How does a GPU actually work? The technology behind modern graphics and AI

Macron’s awkward embrace with Iceland PM Kristrún Frostadóttir goes viral – What happened?

Aliens near US military base? Woman captures bizarre jellyfish-like UFO in Alaska | WATCH

'Miracle on the Mississippi': Cruise boat capsizes after colliding with tanker in New Orleans, all 180 passengers aboard safe

Why are modern GPUs so expensive? 7 things that drive graphics card prices

Why do graphics cards have thousands of small processing cores?

'Don’t f–k around!' Travis Barker opens up on quitting smoking after precancer diagnosis

CPU vs GPU vs NPU: Which processor does your computer actually need?

After Venezuela and Iran, Trump sets sights on another military intervention before leaving office

'Forbidden' light proposed 40 years ago detected for first time in the universe

Avril Lavigne welcomes first child, keeps baby's name and partner's identity private

Why did the FAA suddenly ground flights across the US? Officials reveal what went wrong

Reply 1988 star Ko Kyung Pyo under police investigation after drunk-driving collision in Seoul

Shape-shifting UFO sighting in Oregon leaves mother-daughter sick: 'Fell like a dead bird'

Vaaste singer Dhvani Bhanushali announces engagement to esports entrepreneur Yash Bhanushali; see pics

From chipmakers to cloud giants: How is Nvidia's stock crash shaking the AI industry?

Crystal-clear Ganga water in Haridwar? Viral video creates buzz online | WATCH

Move over Ram and Ravan, Kunal Kapoor's Lord Indra in Ramayana is stealing hearts in Thailand

Eisenkot accuses Netanyahu of fuelling ‘racist’ campaign against Arab Israelis

Nvidia scandal exposes cracks in Trump admin as Bessent blames Lutnick over Megaspeed blacklist delay

Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky's Australian home targeted by burglars;  3 cars stolen

Trump, Putin and Xi to hold historic trilateral meeting at APEC Summit in China

'Don't hike rates': US Treasury Secretary Bessent warns Fed against rate increase amid Iran war

Jensen Huang seen with wife Lori in Paris in photos shared by daughter Madison

A$AP Rocky's New York event disrupted by on-camera brawl, NYPD steps in

24 hours and counting: Microsoft says 'sorry' for global outage

CM Suvendhu Adhikari turns Bengal's Chhath ghats into launchpad for UP campaign

Mohamed Salah becomes Egypt’s all-time top scorer with brace against Malawi

Video captures horrifying moment Brooklyn apartment building collapses, killing eight people

Colombia 'false positives' scandal: 5 retired army men sentenced over killing of 35 civilians

'It exploded in his mouth': Man dies after friend gives him bomb disguised as rasgulla on Diwali in Madhya Pradesh's Dindori

Why do powerful graphics cards need so much electricity?

Indian student sentenced to 30 years in UK for online grooming of over 70 children

Polling in Poonch and Palandri districts of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) will not take place on August 10 as scheduled, with the region's election commission citing security concerns.&nbsp;The third phase of the elections covers seven of the 11 seats. The decision to postpone voting in the two districts came after the first two phases, held on July 27 and August 2, were marred by violent protests.&nbsp;"A new date and revised schedule will be announced after reviewing the situation," the election commission said.&nbsp;The postponement comes amid continuing unrest over demands to scrap 12 seats in the local legislature reserved for people who migrated from the Indian-administered portion of Kashmir.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/we-are-ready-to-talk-jharkhand-cm-hemant-soren-reaches-out-to-protesting-students-1786108876131">‘We are ready to talk’: Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren reaches out to protesting students</a><h3>India rejects PoK polls</h3>India maintained that Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh are integral and inalienable parts of the country and rejected the electoral exercise in PoK. New Delhi said Pakistan is in "illegal and forcible occupation" of parts of these Union Territories.&nbsp;MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said the polls were an attempt to legitimise Pakistan's occupation of the region and conceal the ongoing human rights violations.&nbsp;"The current cosmetic electoral exercise is nothing but an attempt by Pakistan to camouflage its illegal occupation and hide its grave human rights violations in the region. As we have stated earlier, the ongoing mass protest in PoJK, of which you are aware, is the direct consequence of economic exploitation, its denial of fundamental rights to the people and its administrative operations," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said.&nbsp;The Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC) has led the protest movement. The Pakistan government later banned the group under anti-terrorism laws.&nbsp;Pakistan's government also directed international media organisations to seek permission before reporting from areas outside major cities. The move followed coverage of protests and elections in Pakistan-administered Kashmir by foreign news organisations.<h3>JAAC claims hundreds killed</h3>The JAAC claimed that more than 40 people were killed during the first phase of polling on July 27. It further claimed that around 400 protesters had been killed since the first week of June.&nbsp;The first phase of voting resulted in a victory for the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), which won nine of the 13 seats in PoK, according to preliminary results released by the region's Election Commission on Tuesday.&nbsp;The JAAC also claimed that at least 14 of its activists were killed and more than two dozen injured in clashes with law enforcement personnel during the first phase of polling.

Pakistan has postponed the third phase of PoK elections in Poonch and Palandri over security concerns as continuing unrest and violent protests disrupt the contested electoral process.

Polling in Poonch and Palandri districts of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) will not take place on August 10 as scheduled, with the region's election commission citing security concerns. The third phase of the elections covers seven of the 11 seats. The decision to postpone voting in the two districts came after the first two phases, held on July 27 and August 2, were marred by violent protests. "A new date and revised schedule will be announced after reviewing the situation," the election commission said. The postponement comes amid continuing unrest over demands to scrap 12 seats in the local legislature reserved for people who migrated from the Indian-administered portion of Kashmir. Also Read: ‘We are ready to talk’: Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren reaches out to protesting students India rejects PoK polls India maintained that Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh are integral and inalienable parts of the country and rejected the electoral exercise in PoK. New Delhi said Pakistan is in "illegal and forcible occupation" of parts of these Union Territories. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said the polls were an attempt to legitimise Pakistan's occupation of the region and conceal the ongoing human rights violations. "The current cosmetic electoral exercise is nothing but an attempt by Pakistan to camouflage its illegal occupation and hide its grave human rights violations in the region. As we have stated earlier, the ongoing mass protest in PoJK, of which you are aware, is the direct consequence of economic exploitation, its denial of fundamental rights to the people and its administrative operations," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. The Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC) has led the protest movement. The Pakistan government later banned the group under anti-terrorism laws. Pakistan's government also directed international media organisations to seek permission before reporting from areas outside major cities. The move followed coverage of protests and elections in Pakistan-administered Kashmir by foreign news organisations. JAAC claims hundreds killed The JAAC claimed that more than 40 people were killed during the first phase of polling on July 27. It further claimed that around 400 protesters had been killed since the first week of June. The first phase of voting resulted in a victory for the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), which won nine of the 13 seats in PoK, according to preliminary results released by the region's Election Commission on Tuesday. The JAAC also claimed that at least 14 of its activists were killed and more than two dozen injured in clashes with law enforcement personnel during the first phase of polling.

Pakistan has postponed the third phase of PoK elections in Poonch and Palandri over security concerns as continuing unrest and violent protests disrupt the contested electoral process.

PoK polls: Pakistan postpones third phase voting amid ongoing unrest

Panic swept through Debsirin School in Nonthaburi on Friday morning as students fled classrooms after a 14-year-old student allegedly opened fire inside the campus. According to police, the teenager killed five teachers and injured more than 30 people, including students, before turning the gun on himself. Authorities also said he had earlier fatally shot his grandparents before arriving at the school.&nbsp;One seventh-grade student described the terrifying moments inside the school. "I was standing in front of the teacher when she was shot," a shaken seventh grader told the BBC, near the gates of Debsirin School in Nonthaburi. “She was talking to me when [the gunman] showed up.” The student recalled that the gunman moved through classrooms while students desperately searched for ways to escape. "I had to climb over the school fence to escape with other friends," the girl, who the BBC is not naming, continues. Her mother said the ordeal left her daughter believing she would not survive. "[She said] 'I thought I'd never see you again'."&nbsp;Another student initially mistook the sounds for fireworks. "I didn't think it was a gun at first," he said. “There were many shots: bang bang bang. Then it went quiet. Then it started again.” Emergency crews rushed to the campus, transporting the injured to nearby hospitals as distressed families gathered outside the school. Rescue worker Kiatikhun Verapongpradith described the injuries he witnessed. "I saw students who had been shot, some in the arm, some in the back, some in the chest. So I rushed to help get them to the hospital first."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/21-losses-and-counting-trump-administration-s-voter-roll-strategy-faces-fresh-defeat-ahead-of-midterms-1786109077708">21 losses and counting: Trump administration's voter roll strategy faces fresh defeat ahead of midterms</a>&nbsp;Teachers were also among those mourning colleagues lost in the attack. “She was my age. We went to this school together as students. Then we both became teachers at this school.” Police have not announced a motive. Investigators believe the teenager used a 9mm handgun belonging to his grandfather. Forensic investigators reportedly found that many of the shots struck vital areas of the victims' bodies.&nbsp;School staff described the suspect as a high-performing student with good grades and no history of aggressive behaviour. Education officials also said he was an avid gamer. Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said investigators were examining whether academic pressure and personal stress may have contributed to the tragedy. "We learned that his grandmother was a teacher and she might have been strict with him. From what the police gathered from his close friend, they knew he was quite stressed about it."&nbsp;The attack is Thailand's deadliest mass shooting in several years and the second school shooting reported in the country this year. The incident has renewed calls for stronger gun control laws. Thailand has one of Southeast Asia's highest rates of civilian gun ownership, with millions of firearms in circulation, including many that are unlicensed.&nbsp;Opposition leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut urged authorities to strengthen firearm regulations, stating that violence inside schools should prompt a comprehensive review of the country's gun control policies. Investigators continue examining the circumstances surrounding the attack while the nation mourns one of its deadliest school tragedies.

A 14-year-old allegedly carried out a deadly shooting at Debsirin School in Nonthaburi, killing five teachers and injuring over 30 people before taking his own life. The tragedy has reignited debate over Thailand's gun laws and school safety

Panic swept through Debsirin School in Nonthaburi on Friday morning as students fled classrooms after a 14-year-old student allegedly opened fire inside the campus. According to police, the teenager killed five teachers and injured more than 30 people, including students, before turning the gun on himself. Authorities also said he had earlier fatally shot his grandparents before arriving at the school. One seventh-grade student described the terrifying moments inside the school. "I was standing in front of the teacher when she was shot," a shaken seventh grader told the BBC, near the gates of Debsirin School in Nonthaburi. “She was talking to me when [the gunman] showed up.” The student recalled that the gunman moved through classrooms while students desperately searched for ways to escape. "I had to climb over the school fence to escape with other friends," the girl, who the BBC is not naming, continues. Her mother said the ordeal left her daughter believing she would not survive. "[She said] 'I thought I'd never see you again'." Another student initially mistook the sounds for fireworks. "I didn't think it was a gun at first," he said. “There were many shots: bang bang bang. Then it went quiet. Then it started again.” Emergency crews rushed to the campus, transporting the injured to nearby hospitals as distressed families gathered outside the school. Rescue worker Kiatikhun Verapongpradith described the injuries he witnessed. "I saw students who had been shot, some in the arm, some in the back, some in the chest. So I rushed to help get them to the hospital first." Also Read: 21 losses and counting: Trump administration's voter roll strategy faces fresh defeat ahead of midterms Teachers were also among those mourning colleagues lost in the attack. “She was my age. We went to this school together as students. Then we both became teachers at this school.” Police have not announced a motive. Investigators believe the teenager used a 9mm handgun belonging to his grandfather. Forensic investigators reportedly found that many of the shots struck vital areas of the victims' bodies. School staff described the suspect as a high-performing student with good grades and no history of aggressive behaviour. Education officials also said he was an avid gamer. Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said investigators were examining whether academic pressure and personal stress may have contributed to the tragedy. "We learned that his grandmother was a teacher and she might have been strict with him. From what the police gathered from his close friend, they knew he was quite stressed about it." The attack is Thailand's deadliest mass shooting in several years and the second school shooting reported in the country this year. The incident has renewed calls for stronger gun control laws. Thailand has one of Southeast Asia's highest rates of civilian gun ownership, with millions of firearms in circulation, including many that are unlicensed. Opposition leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut urged authorities to strengthen firearm regulations, stating that violence inside schools should prompt a comprehensive review of the country's gun control policies. Investigators continue examining the circumstances surrounding the attack while the nation mourns one of its deadliest school tragedies.

A 14-year-old student opened fire at Debsirin School in Nonthaburi, killing five teachers and injuring more than 30 people before taking his own life, prompting renewed gun control debate

'I was standing in front of the teacher when she was shot': Student recalls Thailand school shooting horror

The Trump administration has suffered its 21st courtroom setback this year in its effort to compel states to hand over voter registration records, with a federal judge ruling that states are not legally required to provide the requested voter rolls to the federal government. As Republicans defend narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, the administration has intensified efforts to increase federal oversight of election administration.&nbsp;President Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that widespread noncitizen voting benefits the Democratic Party. However, multiple state audits and independent studies have consistently concluded that noncitizen voting remains extremely rare. A Reuters investigation found that only 129 people have been prosecuted for noncitizen voting since it became a federal crime in 1996. According to the report, most cases resulted from voter confusion or communication errors with election officials rather than organized voter fraud.&nbsp;Federal courts have repeatedly ruled that the US Constitution grants states primary authority over administering federal elections and that existing federal voting laws do not require states to provide unredacted voter registration records to the Justice Department. "If the Department disagrees with Congress’s judgment ​as to the records necessary to carry out its enforcement duties ... it needs to lodge that objection with Congress," US District Judge Randolph Moss, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, wrote on Thursday ​in dismissing a Justice Department bid to obtain unredacted voter rolls from Washington, DC.&nbsp;The Justice Department has filed lawsuits against more than two dozen states that declined requests to provide voter rolls containing personal information, including dates of birth and partial Social Security numbers. Alongside its legal efforts, the administration has warned states that certain federal disaster funds could be withheld if they do not use the federal SAVE database to verify voter citizenship. It has also pursued policies aimed at limiting eligibility for mail-in voting. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon said in a statement on Monday: "Ensuring that only eligible citizens vote is a core function of government, and ​states have an obligation to maintain accurate voter rolls."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-taiwan-s-president-lai-ching-te-was-taken-to-a-secret-command-centre-during-war-drills-1786102083729">Why Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te was taken to a secret command centre during war drills</a><h2>Justice Department appeals court losses</h2>Since January, federal judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents have ruled against the Justice Department in 21 cases involving voter roll requests. Those rulings include decisions from states led by both parties, such as California and West Virginia. Nine similar lawsuits remain pending, leaving open the possibility of future victories for the administration. The Justice Department has appealed 16 of its losses. One appeal has already been rejected after the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the department's lawsuit against Michigan on June 24. The department has requested a full review by the court's active judges.&nbsp;The administration could also seek review from the US Supreme Court, where conservative justices hold a 6-3 majority, although there is no guarantee the court would agree to hear the cases. In July, Harmeet Dhillon sent letters to election officials in all 50 states warning that they could face criminal charges if they knowingly allowed non-US citizens to remain on voter registration lists. The Department of Homeland Security also announced that certain disaster relief funds could be withheld from states that fail to use the SAVE immigration database to verify voter eligibility.&nbsp;Separately, the Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to allow enforcement of an executive order directing DHS to compile lists of US citizens eligible to vote in each state while restricting mail ballots to voters appearing on those lists. A federal judge blocked the order in several states, ruling that federal agencies currently lack the capability to accurately create such voter lists. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled.<h2>Judge calls effort a 'fishing expedition'</h2>Justice Department attorneys have argued that comparing state voter rolls with the federal SAVE database would help identify non-US citizens who may be registered to vote. Democrats and voting rights organizations have questioned the reliability of SAVE data for determining citizenship status. In a June 27 ruling involving Pennsylvania, US District Judge Cathy Bissoon criticised the federal government's request.&nbsp;In a June 27 order denying the ​administration's bid to obtain Pennsylvania's voter list, Pittsburgh-based US District Judge Cathy Bissoon, an Obama appointee, said the federal government was on a "fishing expedition" to “advance unsubstantiated claims ​of non-citizen voting.” The Justice Department has appealed that ruling before the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which has not yet scheduled arguments.&nbsp;A ​Justice Department spokesperson cited a July 17 Department of Homeland Security finding that more than 250,000 potential noncitizens were registered to vote ​in four states, as well as New Jersey's disclosure that 400 noncitizens cast ballots after being mistakenly registered between 2023 and 2024. The Department of Homeland Security did not specify how many of the 250,000 individuals were confirmed noncitizens, how many actually voted or how the estimate was calculated. New Jersey officials also said there was no evidence the mistakenly cast ballots affected the outcome of any election.

The Trump administration faces its 21st courtroom loss over state voter rolls as federal judges rule states are not obligated to share voter records. The Justice Department continues appeals ahead of the midterm elections

The Trump administration has suffered its 21st courtroom setback this year in its effort to compel states to hand over voter registration records, with a federal judge ruling that states are not legally required to provide the requested voter rolls to the federal government. As Republicans defend narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, the administration has intensified efforts to increase federal oversight of election administration. President Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that widespread noncitizen voting benefits the Democratic Party. However, multiple state audits and independent studies have consistently concluded that noncitizen voting remains extremely rare. A Reuters investigation found that only 129 people have been prosecuted for noncitizen voting since it became a federal crime in 1996. According to the report, most cases resulted from voter confusion or communication errors with election officials rather than organized voter fraud. Federal courts have repeatedly ruled that the US Constitution grants states primary authority over administering federal elections and that existing federal voting laws do not require states to provide unredacted voter registration records to the Justice Department. "If the Department disagrees with Congress’s judgment as to the records necessary to carry out its enforcement duties ... it needs to lodge that objection with Congress," US District Judge Randolph Moss, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, wrote on Thursday in dismissing a Justice Department bid to obtain unredacted voter rolls from Washington, DC. The Justice Department has filed lawsuits against more than two dozen states that declined requests to provide voter rolls containing personal information, including dates of birth and partial Social Security numbers. Alongside its legal efforts, the administration has warned states that certain federal disaster funds could be withheld if they do not use the federal SAVE database to verify voter citizenship. It has also pursued policies aimed at limiting eligibility for mail-in voting. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon said in a statement on Monday: "Ensuring that only eligible citizens vote is a core function of government, and states have an obligation to maintain accurate voter rolls." Also Read: Why Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te was taken to a secret command centre during war drills Justice Department appeals court losses Since January, federal judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents have ruled against the Justice Department in 21 cases involving voter roll requests. Those rulings include decisions from states led by both parties, such as California and West Virginia. Nine similar lawsuits remain pending, leaving open the possibility of future victories for the administration. The Justice Department has appealed 16 of its losses. One appeal has already been rejected after the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the department's lawsuit against Michigan on June 24. The department has requested a full review by the court's active judges. The administration could also seek review from the US Supreme Court, where conservative justices hold a 6-3 majority, although there is no guarantee the court would agree to hear the cases. In July, Harmeet Dhillon sent letters to election officials in all 50 states warning that they could face criminal charges if they knowingly allowed non-US citizens to remain on voter registration lists. The Department of Homeland Security also announced that certain disaster relief funds could be withheld from states that fail to use the SAVE immigration database to verify voter eligibility. Separately, the Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to allow enforcement of an executive order directing DHS to compile lists of US citizens eligible to vote in each state while restricting mail ballots to voters appearing on those lists. A federal judge blocked the order in several states, ruling that federal agencies currently lack the capability to accurately create such voter lists. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled. Judge calls effort a 'fishing expedition' Justice Department attorneys have argued that comparing state voter rolls with the federal SAVE database would help identify non-US citizens who may be registered to vote. Democrats and voting rights organizations have questioned the reliability of SAVE data for determining citizenship status. In a June 27 ruling involving Pennsylvania, US District Judge Cathy Bissoon criticised the federal government's request. In a June 27 order denying the administration's bid to obtain Pennsylvania's voter list, Pittsburgh-based US District Judge Cathy Bissoon, an Obama appointee, said the federal government was on a "fishing expedition" to “advance unsubstantiated claims of non-citizen voting.” The Justice Department has appealed that ruling before the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which has not yet scheduled arguments. A Justice Department spokesperson cited a July 17 Department of Homeland Security finding that more than 250,000 potential noncitizens were registered to vote in four states, as well as New Jersey's disclosure that 400 noncitizens cast ballots after being mistakenly registered between 2023 and 2024. The Department of Homeland Security did not specify how many of the 250,000 individuals were confirmed noncitizens, how many actually voted or how the estimate was calculated. New Jersey officials also said there was no evidence the mistakenly cast ballots affected the outcome of any election.

The Trump administration suffered its 21st court defeat in efforts to obtain state voter rolls, as judges ruled states are not required to share election records with the federal government

21 losses and counting: Trump administration's voter roll strategy faces fresh defeat ahead of midterms

Taiwan conducted a high-level security exercise late on Wednesday, simulating a ‘decapitation strike’ aimed at eliminating the island's leadership, as President Lai Ching-te and senior government officials rehearsed emergency wartime procedures. According to Taiwan's presidential office, an armoured personnel carrier transported President Lai and members of his staff from the Presidential Office in Taipei to a fortified command centre near the Ministry of National Defense. The exercise tested the government's ability to maintain command and continue functioning during a potential attack targeting the country's leadership.&nbsp;"The drill was intended to review the command structure, inter-agency coordination, and emergency-response mechanisms, so as to ensure that the government can continue operating effectively and safeguarding national security" during any possible action against the island, presidential spokesperson Karen Kuo said in a statement on Thursday. Official footage released by the government showed the armoured vehicle moving through the streets of Taipei. President Lai was also seen wearing a flak jacket, receiving military briefings and issuing operational instructions throughout the exercise.<h2>'Wan Chun' drill part of Taiwan's largest annual military exercise</h2>The leadership evacuation exercise, known as the ‘Wan Chun’ drill, forms part of the 10-day Han Kuang military exercises, Taiwan's largest annual defence drills, which began on Wednesday. The Wan Chun drill is designed to simulate the evacuation of Taiwan's president to a secure location during war or other national emergencies. Although this is the first known time President Lai has publicly participated in the exercise, former presidents Tsai Ing-wen and Ma Ying-jeou have taken part in similar drills. The exercise dates back to the Cold War era, when then-leader Chiang Kai-shek feared an attempt by the Chinese Communist Party to target Taiwan's leadership.&nbsp;China considers Taiwan part of its territory despite never having governed the island. Chinese President Xi Jinping has repeatedly vowed to bring Taiwan under Beijing's control and has not ruled out the use of force. Over the years, images released from China have shown mock replicas of Taiwan's Presidential Office, government buildings and Taipei's street layouts built in desert training grounds, where Chinese troops conducted assault simulations. Meanwhile, Beijing continues to exert military and diplomatic pressure on Taiwan through regular military exercises and gray-zone tactics, including operations involving non-military agencies around the island.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-s-internal-matter-mea-hits-back-at-us-congressman-over-fcra-amendment-bill-1786099590095">'India's internal matter': MEA hits back at US Congressman over FCRA Amendment Bill</a><h2>Watch the video here</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Taiwan ​President Lai Ching-te made a late-night dash in the back of an armoured personnel carrier to a command centre as part ‌of annual war games designed to show how the government would continue to work in the event of a war. Taiwan kicked off the Han Kuang exercises on… <a href="https://t.co/MA0MqVqSOb">pic.twitter.com/MA0MqVqSOb</a>&mdash; Mintel World (@mintelworld) <a href="https://x.com/mintelworld/status/2085255180337946853?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 6, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Global conflicts add new urgency to Taiwan's preparations</h2>Taiwanese officials say this year's military drills have gained added significance amid growing global security concerns. The US capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro earlier this year, along with the US-Israeli decapitation strikes targeting Tehran's leadership during the early phase of the conflict with Iran, have reinforced the need for preparedness. "Taiwan needs to ready itself for the scenario now unfolding in Iran, and fast," Charles Lyons-Jones, a research fellow at Australia's Lowy Institute's Foreign Policy and Public Opinion Program, wrote in March. Ahead of the drills, a senior Taiwanese defence official told reporters that the exercises are no longer "lab-like exercise in a vacuum."<h2>Taiwan practices defending strategic bridge near Taipei</h2>Late Thursday night, Taiwanese troops conducted another exercise focused on defending the Danjiang Bridge, a strategic crossing that could provide invading forces with a direct route toward Taipei. The nearly one-kilometre-long bridge, which opened earlier this year, spans the Tamsui River and is regarded as a key strategic asset due to its proximity to Taipei Port and nearby beaches that could potentially be used for amphibious landings. To simulate blocking an advancing enemy, soldiers installed multiple defensive barriers and laid extensive barbed wire across the bridge.&nbsp;During the opening days of the Han Kuang exercises, around 20,000 reservists were mobilised to defend critical infrastructure, including ports, power plants and bridges. Patriot and Tien-Kung air defence missile systems were also deployed on the streets of central Taipei as part of the drills. Taiwan is also preparing for modern communication disruptions. Next week, authorities will deliberately reduce mobile internet speeds for the first time to test how citizens communicate if bandwidth becomes limited during emergencies such as natural disasters or a potential Chinese invasion.

Taiwan simulates a decapitation strike during Han Kuang military drills as President Lai Ching-te rehearses wartime evacuation. Troops defend key bridges amid growing China tensions

Taiwan conducted a high-level security exercise late on Wednesday, simulating a ‘decapitation strike’ aimed at eliminating the island's leadership, as President Lai Ching-te and senior government officials rehearsed emergency wartime procedures. According to Taiwan's presidential office, an armoured personnel carrier transported President Lai and members of his staff from the Presidential Office in Taipei to a fortified command centre near the Ministry of National Defense. The exercise tested the government's ability to maintain command and continue functioning during a potential attack targeting the country's leadership. "The drill was intended to review the command structure, inter-agency coordination, and emergency-response mechanisms, so as to ensure that the government can continue operating effectively and safeguarding national security" during any possible action against the island, presidential spokesperson Karen Kuo said in a statement on Thursday. Official footage released by the government showed the armoured vehicle moving through the streets of Taipei. President Lai was also seen wearing a flak jacket, receiving military briefings and issuing operational instructions throughout the exercise. 'Wan Chun' drill part of Taiwan's largest annual military exercise The leadership evacuation exercise, known as the ‘Wan Chun’ drill, forms part of the 10-day Han Kuang military exercises, Taiwan's largest annual defence drills, which began on Wednesday. The Wan Chun drill is designed to simulate the evacuation of Taiwan's president to a secure location during war or other national emergencies. Although this is the first known time President Lai has publicly participated in the exercise, former presidents Tsai Ing-wen and Ma Ying-jeou have taken part in similar drills. The exercise dates back to the Cold War era, when then-leader Chiang Kai-shek feared an attempt by the Chinese Communist Party to target Taiwan's leadership. China considers Taiwan part of its territory despite never having governed the island. Chinese President Xi Jinping has repeatedly vowed to bring Taiwan under Beijing's control and has not ruled out the use of force. Over the years, images released from China have shown mock replicas of Taiwan's Presidential Office, government buildings and Taipei's street layouts built in desert training grounds, where Chinese troops conducted assault simulations. Meanwhile, Beijing continues to exert military and diplomatic pressure on Taiwan through regular military exercises and gray-zone tactics, including operations involving non-military agencies around the island. Also Read: 'India's internal matter': MEA hits back at US Congressman over FCRA Amendment Bill Watch the video here

Taiwan simulated a ‘decapitation strike’ targeting its leadership as President Lai joined Han Kuang military drills. Troops also defended key infrastructure amid rising tensions with China

Why Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te was taken to a secret command centre during war drills

Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a landmark trilateral defence agreement in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, on Friday, August 7. The historic Makkah Joint Defence Agreement was signed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. The defence agreement comes in the backdrop of the US-Iran war and Israeli aggression in the region, which had entangled the entire Gulf region and disrupted the shipping traffic through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;In a statement, Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, "The Agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three States shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defence cooperation among the three States." It claimed that the agreement was founded on the countries' longstanding historical ties, Islamic solidarity, shared strategic interests, and enduring defence cooperation and reflects their shared commitment to strengthening collective security while promoting “peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future.”Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/shakib-al-hasan-house-attacked-after-sheikh-hasina-press-conference-1785951743958"> Shakib Al Hasan's house attacked after joining Sheikh Hasina's virtual press conference</a>&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🔈 PR No. 2️⃣0️⃣4️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣ Makkah Al-Mukarramah Summit for Joint Defence 🔗⬇️ <a href="https://t.co/mIzASADmau">pic.twitter.com/mIzASADmau</a>&mdash; Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) <a href="https://x.com/ForeignOfficePk/status/2085675356862960111?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Why is the defence agreement happening now?</h2>The three nations are unified by similar concerns about the Shia revolutionary ideology of Iran, Israeli Zionist expansionism and failure of the US to contain the regional conflict. This is significant as Turkey has the second largest military in NATO, Saudi Arabia, one of the world's largest oil exporters, is home to two of the holiest sites of Islam, Mecca and Medina, and Pakistan is the only Islamic country armed with nuclear power.The pact follows a year of negotiation as Turkey's Foreign Minister Hakan ​Fidan said that it favoured a broader regional agreement. It is a build-up on the Saudi-Pakistani pact, which treats an attack on either as an attack on both and encompasses “all military means”. Officials emphasise that this new platform is strictly defensive, intended to stabilise the region, and will not alter or undermine the prior international alliance commitments of any participant.

Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan sign the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, pledging collective defence and enhanced military cooperation.

Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a landmark trilateral defence agreement in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, on Friday, August 7. The historic Makkah Joint Defence Agreement was signed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. The defence agreement comes in the backdrop of the US-Iran war and Israeli aggression in the region, which had entangled the entire Gulf region and disrupted the shipping traffic through the strategic Strait of Hormuz. In a statement, Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, "The Agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three States shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defence cooperation among the three States." It claimed that the agreement was founded on the countries' longstanding historical ties, Islamic solidarity, shared strategic interests, and enduring defence cooperation and reflects their shared commitment to strengthening collective security while promoting “peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future.” Also Read: Shakib Al Hasan's house attacked after joining Sheikh Hasina's virtual press conference

Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan sign the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, pledging collective defence and enhanced military cooperation.

Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan seal landmark Makkah Joint Defence Agreement

In a shocking incident, a teen opened fire at a school in Thailand, killing at least seven people and injuring more than 30. The incident happened in Nonthaburi province at the Debsirin Nonthaburi School. A video from the scene has gone viral on social media, showing students taking cover during the shooting. In the clip, shooting can be heard crying as they stay hidden under the desks.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Watch the chilling classroom footage from Thailand, where students are seen hiding under desks as gunfire rings out during a deadly school shooting. Police say the 14-year-old shooter fired at least 26 rounds. . . .<a href="https://x.com/hashtag/ThailandSchoolShooting?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ThailandSchoolShooting</a> <a href="https://t.co/us0Wj8F3ME">pic.twitter.com/us0Wj8F3ME</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://x.com/WIONews/status/2085635907026407800?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

According to the police, the teen first shot dead his grandparents using his grandfather’s handgun. He then went to a secondary school, where he opened fire at students and teachers. Chaos erupted at the school as parents raced to pick up their children and students and staff comforted each other. More than 30 people were injured in the incident, nine of whom were “severely injured”.Emergency responders were rushed to the spot. An investigation is underway into the incident. AFP reported that a dozen mental health workers also arrived at the school.The shooter was identified as a ninth-grade student of the school and also died in the incident. According to a BBC report, the suspect shot himself and died on the way to the hospital. The motive behind his actions has not been determined yet.<h2>Did shooter plan the attack?</h2>Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said that the teen was “under stress” and had “planned” the attack. He added that he still had “more than 30 bullets left” when he turned the gun on himself.“Police interrogated his close friend, who said the suspect had been under stress” related to his schooling, Anutin told reporters. “His actions also suggested that he had clearly planned (the shooting).”Students at the school described the suspect as a “troubled kid” who was interested in the FBI and guns. They also suggested he was bullied by other students at the school.Thailand has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in Southeast Asia, with an estimated 10 million firearms in circulation, roughly one for every seven residents. Despite repeated government pledges to tighten gun control laws, shootings continue to occur.

A chilling video shows Thai students taking cover as a teen gunman opens fire at Debsirin Nonthaburi School, killing eight people and injuring over 30. The shooter had allegedly killed his grandparents earlier.

In a shocking incident, a teen opened fire at a school in Thailand, killing at least seven people and injuring more than 30. The incident happened in Nonthaburi province at the Debsirin Nonthaburi School. A video from the scene has gone viral on social media, showing students taking cover during the shooting. In the clip, shooting can be heard crying as they stay hidden under the desks.

A chilling video shows Thai students taking cover as a teen gunman opens fire at Debsirin Nonthaburi School, killing seven people and injuring over 30. The shooter had allegedly killed his grandparents earlier.

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Before opening fire at the school in Thailand, where several people were fatally shot, the teenager killed his grandparents at his home on the outskirts of the capital, Bangkok. At least six people, including students and teachers, were killed at the school. The incident happened in Nonthaburi province at the Debsirin Nonthaburi School. Thailand’s Health Ministry confirmed that give teachers were killed at the school.According to the police, the teen first shot dead his grandparents using his grandfather’s handgun. He then went to a secondary school, where he opened fire at students and teachers. Chaos erupted at the school as parents raced to pick up their children and students and staff comforted each other. More than 30 people were injured in the incident, nine of whom were “severely injured”.&nbsp;Emergency responders were rushed to the spot. An investigation is underway into the incident. AFP reported that a dozen mental health workers also arrived at the school.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/at-least-10-students-injured-in-shooting-at-school-near-bangkok-thailand-killed-1786074830390">At least 4 killed, 15 injured in shooting at school near Bangkok</a><h2>What we know about the shooter</h2>The shooter was identified as a ninth-grade student of the school and also died in the incident. According to a BBC report, the suspect shot himself and died on the way to the hospital. The motive behind his actions has not been determined yet.Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said that the teen was “under stress” and had “planned” the attack. He added that he still had “more than 30 bullets left” when he turned the gun on himself.“Police interrogated his close friend who said the suspect had been under stress” related to his schooling, Anutin told reporters. “His actions also suggested that he had clearly planned (the shooting).”&nbsp;The deputy interior minister said that the suspect was an avid gamer, according to the evidence gathered by the police from his residence. The 14-year-old lived with his grandparents. According to the school teachers, the boy was a “good kid with good study records” and was not known to be aggressive.Students at the school described the suspect as a “troubled kid” who was interested in the FBI and guns. They also suggested he was bullied by other students at the school.“He was my junior, but I had a feeling that he was a troubled kid. My group of friends who knew him said he was interested in the FBI and guns, and that he was bullied by many other students,” Purin Khumchoo, 17, told AFP outside his school. He was among the students who were nearly shot by the suspect.“When I saw him aiming the gun at me, I thought he looked very professional, as if he had been trained for a long time.”<h2>Thailand’s gun laws under scrutiny</h2>Thailand has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in Southeast Asia, with an estimated 10 million firearms in circulation, roughly one for every seven residents. Despite repeated government pledges to tighten gun control laws, shootings continue to occur.In February, police shot and arrested a teenage student who opened fire at a school in southern Thailand, killing the principal and injuring two students.The country’s deadliest recent mass shooting occurred in 2022, when a former police officer armed with a gun and a knife attacked a childcare centre in northeastern Thailand, killing 36 people, including 24 children.

A 14-year-old in Thailand allegedly killed his grandparents before opening fire at his school in Nonthaburi, where at least five teachers were killed. The teen later died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Before opening fire at the school in Thailand, where several people were fatally shot, the teenager killed his grandparents at his home on the outskirts of the capital, Bangkok. At least six people, including students and teachers, were killed at the school. The incident happened in Nonthaburi province at the Debsirin Nonthaburi School. Thailand’s Health Ministry confirmed that give teachers were killed at the school. According to the police, the teen first shot dead his grandparents using his grandfather’s handgun. He then went to a secondary school, where he opened fire at students and teachers. Chaos erupted at the school as parents raced to pick up their children and students and staff comforted each other. More than 30 people were injured in the incident, nine of whom were “severely injured”. Emergency responders were rushed to the spot. An investigation is underway into the incident. AFP reported that a dozen mental health workers also arrived at the school. Also read | At least 4 killed, 15 injured in shooting at school near Bangkok What we know about the shooter The shooter was identified as a ninth-grade student of the school and also died in the incident. According to a BBC report, the suspect shot himself and died on the way to the hospital. The motive behind his actions has not been determined yet. Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said that the teen was “under stress” and had “planned” the attack. He added that he still had “more than 30 bullets left” when he turned the gun on himself. “Police interrogated his close friend who said the suspect had been under stress” related to his schooling, Anutin told reporters. “His actions also suggested that he had clearly planned (the shooting).” The deputy interior minister said that the suspect was an avid gamer, according to the evidence gathered by the police from his residence. The 14-year-old lived with his grandparents. According to the school teachers, the boy was a “good kid with good study records” and was not known to be aggressive. Students at the school described the suspect as a “troubled kid” who was interested in the FBI and guns. They also suggested he was bullied by other students at the school. “He was my junior, but I had a feeling that he was a troubled kid. My group of friends who knew him said he was interested in the FBI and guns, and that he was bullied by many other students,” Purin Khumchoo, 17, told AFP outside his school. He was among the students who were nearly shot by the suspect. “When I saw him aiming the gun at me, I thought he looked very professional, as if he had been trained for a long time.” Thailand’s gun laws under scrutiny Thailand has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in Southeast Asia, with an estimated 10 million firearms in circulation, roughly one for every seven residents. Despite repeated government pledges to tighten gun control laws, shootings continue to occur. In February, police shot and arrested a teenage student who opened fire at a school in southern Thailand, killing the principal and injuring two students. The country’s deadliest recent mass shooting occurred in 2022, when a former police officer armed with a gun and a knife attacked a childcare centre in northeastern Thailand, killing 36 people, including 24 children.

A 14-year-old in Thailand allegedly killed his grandparents before opening fire at his school in Nonthaburi, where at least five teachers were killed. The teen later died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Thailand teen killed grandparents before shooting teachers at school – What we know about suspect

A comparison of government expenditure as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), based on data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), has revealed how differently countries allocate public money. The data highlights the contrast between small island economies that rely heavily on external assistance and wealthy nations with large welfare systems that spend a major share of their economic output on public services.According to the data, Kiribati ranks first globally, with government expenditure equal to 98.1 per cent of its GDP. The Pacific island nation stands far ahead of the Marshall Islands, which ranks second with spending at 71.6 per cent of GDP. Third on the list is Ukraine with an expenditure of 71.3 per cent of its GDP, followed by Finland (57.7 per cent), France (57.2 per cent), Micronesia (57.0 per cent), Austria (56 per cent), and Belgium (54.5 per cent).<h2>What does data reveal?</h2>The data raises a question: How are small island nations ranking so high in the list?For island nations like Kiribati and the Marshall Islands, government spending is highly influenced by foreign aid and international grants. With relatively small domestic economies, external funding supports a significant share of public services and development projects. This pushes government expenditure close to the size of their annual economic output when measured as a percentage of GDP.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-china-reopen-nathu-la-route-reviving-historic-silk-route-trade-corridor-1785651009112">India-China reopen Nathu La route, reviving historic Silk Route trade corridor</a>The data also revealed that rich countries spend more, highlighting a strong presence of European welfare states among the highest spenders. Countries like Finland (57.7 per cent), France (57.2 per cent), Belgium (54.5 per cent), Italy (50.6 per cent) and Germany (49.4 per cent) allocate a significant share of their GDP to government programs. Ageing populations and rising healthcare costs have also raised public spending in many nations.<h2>Where does India stand?</h2>According to the IMF data, India spends 28.4 per cent of its GDP. Government expenditure for other major economies: Japan (39.1 per cent), Australia (38.9 per cent), the United States (37.9 per cent), Russia (36.9 per cent), China (33 per cent), Mexico (30.3 per cent), South Korea (22.5 per cent).Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-records-deadliest-month-of-2026-as-terror-violence-kills-606-in-july-1785656351841">Pakistan records deadliest month of 2026 as terror violence kills 606 in July</a><h2>What does higher spending indicate?</h2>Higher government spending does not necessarily indicate better outcomes. While government expenditure can strengthen public services and support economic growth, its impact depends on how effectively funds are used.The composition of spending matters as much as the total amount. While some countries prioritise healthcare, education and welfare, others focus more on infrastructure, defence or debt payments. As a result, countries with similar spending levels can still have very different economic and social outcomes.Watch | UAE becomes Gulf's top oil exporter through Hormuz during war <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/uae-becomes-gulf-s-top-oil-exporter-through-hormuz-during-war-1786084232949/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/uae-becomes-gulf-s-top-oil-exporter-through-hormuz-during-war-1786084232949/embed</a>&nbsp;

IMF data shows Kiribati tops global government spending as a share of GDP, followed by Marshall Islands and Ukraine. The ranking highlights how island economies and welfare-driven nations allocate public funds differently.

A comparison of government expenditure as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), based on data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), has revealed how differently countries allocate public money. The data highlights the contrast between small island economies that rely heavily on external assistance and wealthy nations with large welfare systems that spend a major share of their economic output on public services. According to the data, Kiribati ranks first globally, with government expenditure equal to 98.1 per cent of its GDP. The Pacific island nation stands far ahead of the Marshall Islands, which ranks second with spending at 71.6 per cent of GDP. Third on the list is Ukraine with an expenditure of 71.3 per cent of its GDP, followed by Finland (57.7 per cent), France (57.2 per cent), Micronesia (57.0 per cent), Austria (56 per cent), and Belgium (54.5 per cent). What does data reveal? The data raises a question: How are small island nations ranking so high in the list? For island nations like Kiribati and the Marshall Islands, government spending is highly influenced by foreign aid and international grants. With relatively small domestic economies, external funding supports a significant share of public services and development projects. This pushes government expenditure close to the size of their annual economic output when measured as a percentage of GDP. Also read | India-China reopen Nathu La route, reviving historic Silk Route trade corridor The data also revealed that rich countries spend more, highlighting a strong presence of European welfare states among the highest spenders. Countries like Finland (57.7 per cent), France (57.2 per cent), Belgium (54.5 per cent), Italy (50.6 per cent) and Germany (49.4 per cent) allocate a significant share of their GDP to government programs. Ageing populations and rising healthcare costs have also raised public spending in many nations. Where does India stand? According to the IMF data, India spends 28.4 per cent of its GDP. Government expenditure for other major economies: Japan (39.1 per cent), Australia (38.9 per cent), the United States (37.9 per cent), Russia (36.9 per cent), China (33 per cent), Mexico (30.3 per cent), South Korea (22.5 per cent). Also read | Pakistan records deadliest month of 2026 as terror violence kills 606 in July What does higher spending indicate? Higher government spending does not necessarily indicate better outcomes. While government expenditure can strengthen public services and support economic growth, its impact depends on how effectively funds are used. The composition of spending matters as much as the total amount. While some countries prioritise healthcare, education and welfare, others focus more on infrastructure, defence or debt payments. As a result, countries with similar spending levels can still have very different economic and social outcomes. Watch | UAE becomes Gulf's top oil exporter through Hormuz during war https://www.wionews.com/videos/uae-becomes-gulf-s-top-oil-exporter-through-hormuz-during-war-1786084232949/embed

IMF data shows Kiribati tops global government spending as a share of GDP, followed by Marshall Islands and Ukraine. The ranking highlights how island economies and welfare-driven nations allocate public funds differently.

From Kiribati to France: Which countries spend the most? Check India’s rank

As India marks the eightieth anniversary of its independence this month, it is worth returning to the opening words of Jawaharlal Nehru’s historic “Tryst with Destiny” speech. Few passages in modern political history speak as directly to India’s present aspirations as they do today.<blockquote>“Long years ago we made a tryst with destiny, and now the time comes when we shall redeem our pledge, not wholly or in full measure, but very substantially.”</blockquote>Those words were not simply a celebration of freedom. They were a reminder that independence was only the beginning of a much larger national enterprise. The pledge had been redeemed only “very substantially.” The greater task still lay ahead.Nearly eight decades later, India’s aspiration of Viksit Bharat 2047, articulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, can be viewed as the latest chapter in fulfilling that original promise. While India’s political landscape has changed dramatically since 1947, the country’s larger national mission has displayed remarkable continuity. Different leaders have pursued different priorities, but each has added to the long project of transforming India into a prosperous, confident and globally influential nation.Seen from neighbouring Sri Lanka, this continuity is perhaps one of the defining characteristics of modern India.Outside observers often focus on elections, ideological debates and changes of government. Yet beneath the robust contestation that characterises the world’s largest democracy lies a deeper national consensus: that India must steadily strengthen its economy, institutions, technological capabilities and global standing.Nehru’s generation secured political freedom, established democratic institutions and laid the foundations of a modern state. Later governments accelerated economic liberalisation, expanded infrastructure and integrated India with the global economy. Today, the emphasis has shifted towards advanced manufacturing, digital public infrastructure, innovation, defence capabilities and the ambition of becoming a fully developed nation by the centenary of independence in 2047.Each phase has reflected the needs of its time. Together, they tell a single story.For Sri Lanka, India’s evolution has never been a matter of distant observation. Geography ensures that India’s successes and setbacks inevitably shape our own prospects.A larger Indian economy means greater opportunities for Sri Lankan exports, tourism, investment and educational exchanges. India’s advances in digital public infrastructure, financial technology, renewable energy and manufacturing are already influencing the wider region. As India grows, neighbouring countries increasingly become participants in an expanding regional economic ecosystem rather than simply trading partners.This makes the success of Viksit Bharat relevant not only to India but to South Asia as a whole.Sri Lanka has experienced this first-hand. India’s support during our recent economic crisis, its humanitarian assistance following natural disasters, and its contributions to regional resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how a stronger India can serve as a source of stability for its neighbours. As India’s capabilities continue to grow, so too does its capacity to contribute to the prosperity and security of the wider region.Nehru’s speech, however, contained another message that deserves equal attention today.Its tone was one of responsibility rather than triumph.Freedom, he reminded his audience, brought “opportunities to the greater triumphs and achievements that await us.” Nation-building was presented as a continuous obligation requiring discipline, innovation and public purpose.That spirit remains equally relevant today.The aspiration of becoming a developed nation extends beyond economic growth. It also encompasses strong institutions, educational excellence, scientific innovation, efficient cities, environmental stewardship and ensuring that the benefits of prosperity are widely shared.The destination matters. So too does the character of the journey.These reflections resonate particularly strongly in Sri Lanka.In 2028, Sri Lanka will celebrate the eightieth anniversary of its own independence. Our national experience has been different from India’s, yet we too face the enduring challenge of translating political freedom into sustained economic and social transformation.Recent years have reminded us that independence is never a finished achievement. Every generation must renew the institutions, policies and national purpose that sustain it.In that sense, India’s present journey offers valuable lessons for the entire region.One lesson is the importance of thinking beyond electoral cycles. The aspiration of Viksit Bharat 2047 asks citizens to look across generations rather than governments. Such long-term national vision is difficult to sustain in any democracy, yet it is often the foundation of lasting transformation.Another lesson is the importance of confidence.When Nehru spoke on that midnight in August 1947, India faced poverty, illiteracy and immense uncertainty. Few would have imagined that within eight decades it would become one of the world’s largest economies, a leader in digital public infrastructure, a major space power and an increasingly influential voice in global affairs.The journey itself demonstrates what sustained national purpose can achieve.As India approaches the centenary of its independence, its greatest strength has been the continuity of its national mission. Successful nations build through continuity as much as through change. The institutions established by one generation, the reforms undertaken by another and the ambitions articulated by today’s leadership together shape the future.For Sri Lanka, this perspective is both reassuring and instructive.Our prosperity will increasingly depend on engaging with an India that is larger, wealthier, more innovative and more globally connected than ever before. Rather than viewing this transformation with anxiety, we should approach it with strategic confidence and imagination.If India fulfils its ambition of becoming a developed nation by 2047, the consequences will extend far beyond its borders. They will reshape South Asia’s economic landscape and create new opportunities for regional cooperation.Perhaps that is why Nehru’s opening words continue to resonate after eighty years. The “tryst with destiny” did not end at the stroke of midnight in 1947. It invited each generation to redeem the nation’s pledge more fully than the last. Seen from Sri Lanka, Viksit Bharat 2047 can be understood as a continuation of the aspirations that have guided India’s national journey since independence.

As India approaches the centenary of its independence, its greatest strength has been the continuity of its national mission. Successful nations build through continuity as much as through change. 

As India marks the eightieth anniversary of its independence this month, it is worth returning to the opening words of Jawaharlal Nehru’s historic “Tryst with Destiny” speech. Few passages in modern political history speak as directly to India’s present aspirations as they do today. “Long years ago we made a tryst with destiny, and now the time comes when we shall redeem our pledge, not wholly or in full measure, but very substantially.” Those words were not simply a celebration of freedom. They were a reminder that independence was only the beginning of a much larger national enterprise. The pledge had been redeemed only “very substantially.” The greater task still lay ahead. Nearly eight decades later, India’s aspiration of Viksit Bharat 2047, articulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, can be viewed as the latest chapter in fulfilling that original promise. While India’s political landscape has changed dramatically since 1947, the country’s larger national mission has displayed remarkable continuity. Different leaders have pursued different priorities, but each has added to the long project of transforming India into a prosperous, confident and globally influential nation. Seen from neighbouring Sri Lanka, this continuity is perhaps one of the defining characteristics of modern India. Outside observers often focus on elections, ideological debates and changes of government. Yet beneath the robust contestation that characterises the world’s largest democracy lies a deeper national consensus: that India must steadily strengthen its economy, institutions, technological capabilities and global standing. Nehru’s generation secured political freedom, established democratic institutions and laid the foundations of a modern state. Later governments accelerated economic liberalisation, expanded infrastructure and integrated India with the global economy. Today, the emphasis has shifted towards advanced manufacturing, digital public infrastructure, innovation, defence capabilities and the ambition of becoming a fully developed nation by the centenary of independence in 2047. Each phase has reflected the needs of its time. Together, they tell a single story. For Sri Lanka, India’s evolution has never been a matter of distant observation. Geography ensures that India’s successes and setbacks inevitably shape our own prospects. A larger Indian economy means greater opportunities for Sri Lankan exports, tourism, investment and educational exchanges. India’s advances in digital public infrastructure, financial technology, renewable energy and manufacturing are already influencing the wider region. As India grows, neighbouring countries increasingly become participants in an expanding regional economic ecosystem rather than simply trading partners. This makes the success of Viksit Bharat relevant not only to India but to South Asia as a whole. Sri Lanka has experienced this first-hand. India’s support during our recent economic crisis, its humanitarian assistance following natural disasters, and its contributions to regional resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how a stronger India can serve as a source of stability for its neighbours. As India’s capabilities continue to grow, so too does its capacity to contribute to the prosperity and security of the wider region. Nehru’s speech, however, contained another message that deserves equal attention today. Its tone was one of responsibility rather than triumph. Freedom, he reminded his audience, brought “opportunities to the greater triumphs and achievements that await us.” Nation-building was presented as a continuous obligation requiring discipline, innovation and public purpose. That spirit remains equally relevant today. The aspiration of becoming a developed nation extends beyond economic growth. It also encompasses strong institutions, educational excellence, scientific innovation, efficient cities, environmental stewardship and ensuring that the benefits of prosperity are widely shared. The destination matters. So too does the character of the journey. These reflections resonate particularly strongly in Sri Lanka. In 2028, Sri Lanka will celebrate the eightieth anniversary of its own independence. Our national experience has been different from India’s, yet we too face the enduring challenge of translating political freedom into sustained economic and social transformation. Recent years have reminded us that independence is never a finished achievement. Every generation must renew the institutions, policies and national purpose that sustain it. In that sense, India’s present journey offers valuable lessons for the entire region. One lesson is the importance of thinking beyond electoral cycles. The aspiration of Viksit Bharat 2047 asks citizens to look across generations rather than governments. Such long-term national vision is difficult to sustain in any democracy, yet it is often the foundation of lasting transformation. Another lesson is the importance of confidence. When Nehru spoke on that midnight in August 1947, India faced poverty, illiteracy and immense uncertainty. Few would have imagined that within eight decades it would become one of the world’s largest economies, a leader in digital public infrastructure, a major space power and an increasingly influential voice in global affairs. The journey itself demonstrates what sustained national purpose can achieve. As India approaches the centenary of its independence, its greatest strength has been the continuity of its national mission. Successful nations build through continuity as much as through change. The institutions established by one generation, the reforms undertaken by another and the ambitions articulated by today’s leadership together shape the future. For Sri Lanka, this perspective is both reassuring and instructive. Our prosperity will increasingly depend on engaging with an India that is larger, wealthier, more innovative and more globally connected than ever before. Rather than viewing this transformation with anxiety, we should approach it with strategic confidence and imagination. If India fulfils its ambition of becoming a developed nation by 2047, the consequences will extend far beyond its borders. They will reshape South Asia’s economic landscape and create new opportunities for regional cooperation. Perhaps that is why Nehru’s opening words continue to resonate after eighty years. The “tryst with destiny” did not end at the stroke of midnight in 1947. It invited each generation to redeem the nation’s pledge more fully than the last. Seen from Sri Lanka, Viksit Bharat 2047 can be understood as a continuation of the aspirations that have guided India’s national journey since independence.

As India approaches the centenary of its independence, its greatest strength has been the continuity of its national mission. Successful nations build through continuity as much as through change.&nbsp;

India at 80: From Nehru’s ‘Tryst with Destiny’ to Viksit Bharat 2047—A view from Sri Lanka

At least four people were killed, including two students and two teachers, and 15 others were wounded in a shooting incident at a high school in Thailand on Friday (Aug 7), Deputy Interior Minister Polapee Suwunchwee said. The incident happened in the Bang Kruai ‌district ⁠of Nonthaburi province, north of Bangkok. The minister added that those injured in the incident were not wounded because of the gunfire but as they were trying to flee the scene.“A shooting has occurred at a well-known high school in Bang Kruai district, Nonthaburi province. Initial reports indicate 10-15 people have been injured,” local broadcaster Thai PBS said. Reportedly, the shooter, identified as a teenager, has been killed.Thailand has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in Southeast Asia, with an estimated 10 million firearms in circulation, roughly one for every seven residents. Despite repeated government pledges to tighten gun control laws, shootings continue to occur.In February, police shot and arrested a teenage student who opened fire at a school in southern Thailand, killing the principal and injuring two students.The country’s deadliest recent mass shooting occurred in 2022, when a former police officer armed with a gun and a knife attacked a childcare centre in northeastern Thailand, killing 36 people, including 24 children.<h2>Who was the shooter?</h2>The shooter has been identified as a ninth grade student, according to BBC report citing Dechrapee Kongdee, chief of the Nonthaburi provincial police

A school shooting in Thailand’s Nonthaburi province injured 10–15 students on Friday. Police identified the suspected shooter as a student.

At least four people were killed, including two students and two teachers, and 15 others were wounded in a shooting incident at a high school in Thailand on Friday (Aug 7), Deputy Interior Minister Polapee Suwunchwee said. The incident happened in the Bang Kruai ‌district ⁠of Nonthaburi province, north of Bangkok. The minister added that those injured in the incident were not wounded because of the gunfire but as they were trying to flee the scene. “A shooting has occurred at a well-known high school in Bang Kruai district, Nonthaburi province. Initial reports indicate 10-15 people have been injured,” local broadcaster Thai PBS said. Reportedly, the shooter, identified as a teenager, has been killed. Thailand has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in Southeast Asia, with an estimated 10 million firearms in circulation, roughly one for every seven residents. Despite repeated government pledges to tighten gun control laws, shootings continue to occur. In February, police shot and arrested a teenage student who opened fire at a school in southern Thailand, killing the principal and injuring two students. The country’s deadliest recent mass shooting occurred in 2022, when a former police officer armed with a gun and a knife attacked a childcare centre in northeastern Thailand, killing 36 people, including 24 children. Who was the shooter? The shooter has been identified as a ninth grade student, according to BBC report citing Dechrapee Kongdee, chief of the Nonthaburi provincial police

A school shooting in Thailand’s Nonthaburi province killed four people and injured 15 on Friday. Police identified the suspected shooter as a student.

At least 4 killed 15 injured in shooting at school near Bangkok

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) said that he believes that the war with Iran, which has been going on for over 5 months, will be over “pretty soon”. Trump also admitted that some munitions were experiencing a “little bit tighter” supply. His remarks come amid reports suggesting that the American forces were running out of supplies of some weapons.“I think it’s going to end pretty soon. I don’t think they can go much longer,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office in a reference to Iran.<h2>Is US running out of munitions?</h2>Earlier on Tuesday (Aug 4), Reuters reported that the US Army had used up “virtually all” of its global stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during the conflict in the Middle East. It added that much of the US Army’s surface-to-surface weapons, Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), had been used up.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iranian-hackers-behind-cyberattack-on-minnesota-water-systems-what-we-know-1785484942363">Iranian hackers behind cyberattack on Minnesota water systems? What we know</a>When asked about the supply of munitions stockpiles, Trump said that the United States had an “unlimited supply” of certain weapons. However, the US president admitted that other inventories were limited.“We have certain types of munitions that are very powerful, that we have unlimited, virtual unlimited supply. We have others where it’s a little bit tighter,” Trump said.He added that US defence firms were setting up more production plants, including facilities for Patriot and Tomahawk missiles.ATACMS and PrSM are long-range munitions that cost more than $1 million each and are an integral part of the US military’s arsenal. The US-supplied ATACMS have also been used by Ukraine to strike targets inside Russia during the war.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Trump said the Iran war could end soon and admitted some US munitions supplies were “a little bit tighter.” His remarks followed reports that stocks of key long-range missiles had been heavily depleted.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) said that he believes that the war with Iran, which has been going on for over 5 months, will be over “pretty soon”. Trump also admitted that some munitions were experiencing a “little bit tighter” supply. His remarks come amid reports suggesting that the American forces were running out of supplies of some weapons. “I think it’s going to end pretty soon. I don’t think they can go much longer,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office in a reference to Iran. Is US running out of munitions? Earlier on Tuesday (Aug 4), Reuters reported that the US Army had used up “virtually all” of its global stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during the conflict in the Middle East. It added that much of the US Army’s surface-to-surface weapons, Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), had been used up. Also read | Iranian hackers behind cyberattack on Minnesota water systems? What we know When asked about the supply of munitions stockpiles, Trump said that the United States had an “unlimited supply” of certain weapons. However, the US president admitted that other inventories were limited. “We have certain types of munitions that are very powerful, that we have unlimited, virtual unlimited supply. We have others where it’s a little bit tighter,” Trump said. He added that US defence firms were setting up more production plants, including facilities for Patriot and Tomahawk missiles. ATACMS and PrSM are long-range munitions that cost more than $1 million each and are an integral part of the US military’s arsenal. The US-supplied ATACMS have also been used by Ukraine to strike targets inside Russia during the war. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Trump said the Iran war could end soon and admitted some US munitions supplies were “a little bit tighter.” His remarks followed reports that stocks of key long-range missiles had been heavily depleted.

‘Certain munitions are unlimited, others...’: Did Trump admit some US weapons supplies were limited?

Iran's Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Thursday (Aug 6) accused the United States of engaging in "theatre diplomacy," dismissing Washington's negotiating tactics as ineffective amid escalating tensions over the Strait of Hormuz.His remarks come after US President Donald Trump claimed the two sides were making progress in talks over reopening the strategic waterway, an assertion that Tehran has firmly denied.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/born-in-the-usa-trump-targets-birth-tourism-with-new-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-made-a-joke-out-of-it-1786060006452">Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order</a><h2>Ghalibaf: 'We don't need more theatre'</h2>In a post on X on Thursday, Ghalibaf took a direct swipe at Washington's approach, accusing it of alternating between military threats and calls for negotiations. "Massive attack coming... wait, never mind, they want to negotiate. That's theatre diplomacy on loop," he wrote.“Using bullying + broken promises + fake news as leverage is a failed strategy. Acknowledge the facts and fulfil your commitments. We don't need more theatre.”<h2>Iran says military is ready for any threat</h2>The rhetoric was echoed by Iran's Acting Defence Minister Brigadier General Majid Ebn-e-Reza, who said the country's armed forces were fully prepared to respond to any external challenge.According to Iran's state news agency IRNA, Ebn-e-Reza said Iran's military strength was built on its domestic defence industry rather than foreign weapons. "Every day, the signs of the enemy's erosion of power become more evident; however, our Armed Forces, relying on the country's defence industry, are fully equipped to respond to any threat," he said.He also claimed that countries dependent on imported military equipment would eventually realise that Iran's indigenous defence capabilities had surpassed those of regional rivals.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-says-strait-of-hormuz-remains-open-despite-unwarranted-iranian-aggression-as-report-suggest-deal-to-reopen-vital-waterway-close-1785897369267">US says Strait of Hormuz remains open despite ‘unwarranted Iranian aggression,’ as report suggest deal to reopen vital waterway close</a><h2>Trump says talks are progressing</h2>The exchange follows fresh remarks by Trump, who warned that Iran would be "hit very hard" if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened "very soon." The US president also said Washington was engaged in "very good discussions" with Iranian officials and suggested Tehran had reached out to negotiate.The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most strategically important shipping lanes, carrying a significant share of global oil and liquefied natural gas exports.<h2>Tehran rejects negotiations</h2>Iran quickly rejected Trump's claims. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei said Tehran was "not holding any negotiations with the United States at present," adding that Iran's diplomatic team remained in Tehran, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi away on a pilgrimage to Iraq.Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance acknowledged that talks, if they occur, would likely be difficult. In an interview with Fox News, Vance described Iran's leadership as divided and said negotiations would be "messy" and "take some time." He added that Washington would continue using military, economic and diplomatic pressure while maintaining that Iran would never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon.`

Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has accused the United States of engaging in "theatre diplomacy", rejecting President Donald Trump's claims that talks over reopening the Strait of Hormuz are progressing. Tehran insists no negotiations are taking place.

Iran's Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Thursday (Aug 6) accused the United States of engaging in "theatre diplomacy," dismissing Washington's negotiating tactics as ineffective amid escalating tensions over the Strait of Hormuz. His remarks come after US President Donald Trump claimed the two sides were making progress in talks over reopening the strategic waterway, an assertion that Tehran has firmly denied. Also read | Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order Ghalibaf: 'We don't need more theatre' In a post on X on Thursday, Ghalibaf took a direct swipe at Washington's approach, accusing it of alternating between military threats and calls for negotiations. "Massive attack coming... wait, never mind, they want to negotiate. That's theatre diplomacy on loop," he wrote. “Using bullying + broken promises + fake news as leverage is a failed strategy. Acknowledge the facts and fulfil your commitments. We don't need more theatre.” Iran says military is ready for any threat The rhetoric was echoed by Iran's Acting Defence Minister Brigadier General Majid Ebn-e-Reza, who said the country's armed forces were fully prepared to respond to any external challenge. According to Iran's state news agency IRNA, Ebn-e-Reza said Iran's military strength was built on its domestic defence industry rather than foreign weapons. "Every day, the signs of the enemy's erosion of power become more evident; however, our Armed Forces, relying on the country's defence industry, are fully equipped to respond to any threat," he said. He also claimed that countries dependent on imported military equipment would eventually realise that Iran's indigenous defence capabilities had surpassed those of regional rivals. Also read | US says Strait of Hormuz remains open despite ‘unwarranted Iranian aggression,’ as report suggest deal to reopen vital waterway close Trump says talks are progressing The exchange follows fresh remarks by Trump, who warned that Iran would be "hit very hard" if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened "very soon." The US president also said Washington was engaged in "very good discussions" with Iranian officials and suggested Tehran had reached out to negotiate. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most strategically important shipping lanes, carrying a significant share of global oil and liquefied natural gas exports. Tehran rejects negotiations Iran quickly rejected Trump's claims. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei said Tehran was "not holding any negotiations with the United States at present," adding that Iran's diplomatic team remained in Tehran, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi away on a pilgrimage to Iraq. Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance acknowledged that talks, if they occur, would likely be difficult. In an interview with Fox News, Vance described Iran's leadership as divided and said negotiations would be "messy" and "take some time." He added that Washington would continue using military, economic and diplomatic pressure while maintaining that Iran would never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon.`

Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has accused the United States of engaging in "theatre diplomacy", rejecting President Donald Trump's claims that talks over reopening the Strait of Hormuz are progressing. Tehran insists no negotiations are taking place.

'Massive attack coming... wait, never mind': Iran mocks US 'theatre diplomacy,' rejects Trump's claim of Hormuz progress

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to expand social media vetting for more categories of US visa applicants, including foreign journalists, as part of a broader tightening of immigration screening.According to a report by The Daily Signal, which was reposted by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X, the US State Department is considering new requirements that would require certain visa applicants to make their social media profiles public to facilitate government scrutiny during the visa process.<h2>What is changing?</h2>The report, which cites an internal State Department memo, says applicants covered under the expanded policy would be required to change the privacy settings of their social media accounts to "public" or "open." The expanded vetting is expected to apply to foreign media representatives and some visa applicants from Canada and Mexico.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/born-in-the-usa-trump-targets-birth-tourism-with-new-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-made-a-joke-out-of-it-1786060006452">Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order</a>Notably, the United States already requires applicants for several visa categories, including student visas, to make their social media accounts publicly accessible as part of the screening process.<h2>State Department responds</h2>Without confirming the reported changes, the State Department said it regularly reviews its visa screening procedures to safeguard US national security. "The department is constantly reviewing and evaluating screening and vetting procedures worldwide to ensure that our visa process upholds the highest standards for US national security and public safety," a State Department spokesperson told AFP.The spokesperson added that online screening helps determine whether applicants qualify for visas under US law and whether they pose any security risks. "Online presence vetting is about applicants demonstrating their eligibility to receive a visa under US law and ensuring that no individual poses a risk to the safety and security of the United States," the spokesperson said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/planning-to-study-or-work-in-the-us-one-missing-document-could-now-cost-indians-their-us-visa-or-green-card-1785996613542">Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card</a><h2>Part of Trump's tougher immigration policy</h2>The reported move comes as President Donald Trump continues to tighten immigration rules after returning to office. The administration has pursued stricter border controls, stepped up deportations of undocumented migrants and imposed new restrictions on legal immigration.Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly defended the tougher approach, saying, "A visa is a privilege, not a right."<h2>New limits on students and journalists</h2>The reported expansion of social media checks follows another recent immigration policy change affecting temporary visa holders.Last month, the Trump administration finalised rules imposing stricter limits on how long foreign students and journalists can remain in the United States.Under the new framework, international students will generally be admitted for the duration of their academic programme, up to a maximum of four years. Foreign journalists, meanwhile, will be limited to stays of 240 days, or roughly eight months, although they will be able to apply for extensions of a similar duration.

The Trump admin is reportedly considering expanding social media vetting to more US visa applicants, including foreign journalists. Under the proposal, affected applicants may have to make their social media accounts public to allow government scrutiny as part of the visa screening process.

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to expand social media vetting for more categories of US visa applicants, including foreign journalists, as part of a broader tightening of immigration screening. According to a report by The Daily Signal, which was reposted by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X, the US State Department is considering new requirements that would require certain visa applicants to make their social media profiles public to facilitate government scrutiny during the visa process. What is changing? The report, which cites an internal State Department memo, says applicants covered under the expanded policy would be required to change the privacy settings of their social media accounts to "public" or "open." The expanded vetting is expected to apply to foreign media representatives and some visa applicants from Canada and Mexico. Also read | Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order Notably, the United States already requires applicants for several visa categories, including student visas, to make their social media accounts publicly accessible as part of the screening process. State Department responds Without confirming the reported changes, the State Department said it regularly reviews its visa screening procedures to safeguard US national security. "The department is constantly reviewing and evaluating screening and vetting procedures worldwide to ensure that our visa process upholds the highest standards for US national security and public safety," a State Department spokesperson told AFP. The spokesperson added that online screening helps determine whether applicants qualify for visas under US law and whether they pose any security risks. "Online presence vetting is about applicants demonstrating their eligibility to receive a visa under US law and ensuring that no individual poses a risk to the safety and security of the United States," the spokesperson said. Also read | Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card Part of Trump's tougher immigration policy The reported move comes as President Donald Trump continues to tighten immigration rules after returning to office. The administration has pursued stricter border controls, stepped up deportations of undocumented migrants and imposed new restrictions on legal immigration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly defended the tougher approach, saying, "A visa is a privilege, not a right." New limits on students and journalists The reported expansion of social media checks follows another recent immigration policy change affecting temporary visa holders. Last month, the Trump administration finalised rules imposing stricter limits on how long foreign students and journalists can remain in the United States. Under the new framework, international students will generally be admitted for the duration of their academic programme, up to a maximum of four years. Foreign journalists, meanwhile, will be limited to stays of 240 days, or roughly eight months, although they will be able to apply for extensions of a similar duration.

The Trump admin is reportedly considering expanding social media vetting to more US visa applicants, including foreign journalists. Under the proposal, affected applicants may have to make their social media accounts public to allow government scrutiny as part of the visa screening process.

US may force more visa applicants to make social media accounts public under Trump's new plan

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) signed a fresh executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, targeting what his administration describes as "birth tourism" and other categories of foreign nationals whose children could automatically acquire US citizenship.The move marks Trump's latest attempt to narrow the scope of the constitutional right, weeks after the US Supreme Court blocked an earlier effort to end automatic citizenship for children born to undocumented migrants and temporary visa holders.<h2>What is Trump's new order?</h2>Speaking at the White House on Thursday, Trump accused people of exploiting birthright citizenship by entering the United States on tourist visas solely to give birth. "They've taken birthright citizenship, and they've made a joke out of it," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "We're making adjustments because it's very unfair," he added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/planning-to-study-or-work-in-the-us-one-missing-document-could-now-cost-indians-their-us-visa-or-green-card-1785996613542">Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card</a>According to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the executive order is intended to prevent citizenship benefits from being extended to children born to individuals who travel to the US primarily to give birth.Miller also said the order would cover children of members of "foreign terrorist organizations" and "large categories of people who lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments."He said the measure "ensures that large numbers of people who wrongly (would) be getting birthright citizenship will no longer be eligible for those benefits."<h2>Why is birthright citizenship controversial?</h2>Birthright citizenship is guaranteed under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, which states that "all persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."There are already limited exceptions. Children born to foreign diplomats, for example, do not automatically receive US citizenship because their parents are not considered subject to US jurisdiction.US immigration law also already allows consular officers to deny visas if they believe an applicant's primary purpose for travelling is to give birth in the country.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-trump-s-helicopter-nearly-collide-with-a-passenger-jet-us-launches-probe-1785981732847">Did Trump's helicopter nearly collide with a passenger jet? US launches probe</a><h2>Supreme Court blocked Trump's earlier attempt</h2>Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born to parents who were in the US illegally or on temporary visas.Lower courts halted the policy, and in late June the US Supreme Court ruled against the administration, reaffirming constitutional protections for birthright citizenship. Trump called that decision "very unfortunate."His administration had argued that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors.

US President Donald Trump has signed a new executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship by targeting so called “birth tourism”. The move comes weeks after the Supreme Court blocked his earlier attempt to limit automatic US citizenship for children born on American soil.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) signed a fresh executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, targeting what his administration describes as "birth tourism" and other categories of foreign nationals whose children could automatically acquire US citizenship. The move marks Trump's latest attempt to narrow the scope of the constitutional right, weeks after the US Supreme Court blocked an earlier effort to end automatic citizenship for children born to undocumented migrants and temporary visa holders. What is Trump's new order? Speaking at the White House on Thursday, Trump accused people of exploiting birthright citizenship by entering the United States on tourist visas solely to give birth. "They've taken birthright citizenship, and they've made a joke out of it," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "We're making adjustments because it's very unfair," he added. Also read | Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card According to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the executive order is intended to prevent citizenship benefits from being extended to children born to individuals who travel to the US primarily to give birth. Miller also said the order would cover children of members of "foreign terrorist organizations" and "large categories of people who lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments." He said the measure "ensures that large numbers of people who wrongly (would) be getting birthright citizenship will no longer be eligible for those benefits." Why is birthright citizenship controversial? Birthright citizenship is guaranteed under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, which states that "all persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." There are already limited exceptions. Children born to foreign diplomats, for example, do not automatically receive US citizenship because their parents are not considered subject to US jurisdiction. US immigration law also already allows consular officers to deny visas if they believe an applicant's primary purpose for travelling is to give birth in the country. Also read | Did Trump's helicopter nearly collide with a passenger jet? US launches probe Supreme Court blocked Trump's earlier attempt Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born to parents who were in the US illegally or on temporary visas. Lower courts halted the policy, and in late June the US Supreme Court ruled against the administration, reaffirming constitutional protections for birthright citizenship. Trump called that decision "very unfortunate." His administration had argued that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors.

US President Donald Trump has signed a new executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship by targeting so called “birth tourism”. The move comes weeks after the Supreme Court blocked his earlier attempt to limit automatic US citizenship for children born on American soil.

Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order

France has submitted a detailed technical and commercial proposal to India for the proposed government-to-government purchase of 114 Rafale multirole fighter aircraft, marking a key milestone in one of the country’s biggest military procurement programmes. A key highlight of the proposal is the plan for large-scale local manufacturing and production of the multi-role combat aircraft in India.&nbsp;The proposal, submitted in response to India’s Letter of Request (LoR) issued in May, is being examined by the Defence Ministry’s Acquisition Wing and the Indian Air Force, reported news agency ANI, citing defence sources.&nbsp;The deal envisages massive local manufacturing, with 94 of the 114 jets to be produced in India in partnership with domestic industry as per New Delhi’s demand for integrating Indian weapons like the variants of the Astra air-to-air missiles and indigenous content in the aircraft.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/squadron-leader-bhawana-kanth-scripts-history-as-indian-air-force-gets-its-first-woman-top-gun-pilot-1786033737342">Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot</a><h2>94 Rafale multi-role combat jets to be manufactured in India</h2>&nbsp;As per the proposal, the French side will be required to manufacture 94 of the 114 Rafale aircraft in India in partnership with a local industry partner.&nbsp;For the local production of aircraft, major French defence companies like aerospace major Dassault Aviation, missile manufacturer MBDA, engine maker Safran, and defence electronics company Thales will work with an Indian industry partner to execute the deal.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/at-least-30-yemeni-government-troops-killed-in-houthi-missile-and-drone-attacks-toll-may-go-up-1786029767352">At least 30 Yemeni troops killed in Houthi missile and drone attacks; toll may go up</a>&nbsp;The Indian side will scrutinise the French offer, including the proposed plans for integrating indigenous systems like the variants of Astra beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile and increasing domestic content in the aircraft, the sources said.&nbsp;&nbsp;If approved, the deal is likely to generate business opportunities worth around Rs 1.6 lakh crore for Indian companies like Tata Group, Larsen &amp; Toubro and other defence manufacturers, while significantly boosting the country’s aerospace manufacturing ecosystem.&nbsp;The Rafale jets are expected to become one of the key components of the Indian Air Force’s future fleet. The aircraft was selected by the Defence Ministry in 2012 after a long and competitive global evaluation process.&nbsp;<h2>No. of Rafale jets in India's inventory may go over 200&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;The acquisition of the Rafale aircraft is considered crucial for addressing the Indian Air Force’s operational requirements, as its squadron strength has been declining due to the retirement of ageing aircraft, including Russian-origin MiG fighter jet variants, and delays in the induction of indigenous platforms such as the LCA Mark 1A and LCA Mark 2.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/jharkhand-students-on-hunger-strike-demand-cm-hemant-soren-s-resignation-plan-state-assembly-gherao-1786025129251">Jharkhand students on hunger strike demand CM Hemant Soren’s resignation, plan state assembly gherao</a>&nbsp;The Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy have previously placed orders for 62 Rafale aircraft. With the proposed acquisition of 114 Rafale aircraft, the total number of Rafales in India’s inventory could rise to 176.&nbsp;Besides, the Indian Navy has also expressed its intent to induct 31 more of these jets to tackle maritime threats, and that may take the number of Rafales in the country to over 200.&nbsp;The Defence Ministry conducted a detailed capability assessment under Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh soon after he assumed office in 2024 to address the Indian Air Force's requirements and has been working on strengthening the force’s capabilities.&nbsp;The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) had approved the Indian Air Force’s proposal to acquire 114 Rafale fighter jets around five months ago.

If approved, the deal is likely to generate business opportunities worth around Rs 1.6 lakh crore for Indian companies like Tata Group, Larsen & Toubro, and other defence manufacturers, while significantly boosting the country’s aerospace manufacturing ecosystem.

France has submitted a detailed technical and commercial proposal to India for the proposed government-to-government purchase of 114 Rafale multirole fighter aircraft, marking a key milestone in one of the country’s biggest military procurement programmes. A key highlight of the proposal is the plan for large-scale local manufacturing and production of the multi-role combat aircraft in India. The proposal, submitted in response to India’s Letter of Request (LoR) issued in May, is being examined by the Defence Ministry’s Acquisition Wing and the Indian Air Force, reported news agency ANI, citing defence sources. The deal envisages massive local manufacturing, with 94 of the 114 jets to be produced in India in partnership with domestic industry as per New Delhi’s demand for integrating Indian weapons like the variants of the Astra air-to-air missiles and indigenous content in the aircraft. Also Read: Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot 94 Rafale multi-role combat jets to be manufactured in India As per the proposal, the French side will be required to manufacture 94 of the 114 Rafale aircraft in India in partnership with a local industry partner. For the local production of aircraft, major French defence companies like aerospace major Dassault Aviation, missile manufacturer MBDA, engine maker Safran, and defence electronics company Thales will work with an Indian industry partner to execute the deal. Also Read: At least 30 Yemeni troops killed in Houthi missile and drone attacks; toll may go up The Indian side will scrutinise the French offer, including the proposed plans for integrating indigenous systems like the variants of Astra beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile and increasing domestic content in the aircraft, the sources said. If approved, the deal is likely to generate business opportunities worth around Rs 1.6 lakh crore for Indian companies like Tata Group, Larsen & Toubro and other defence manufacturers, while significantly boosting the country’s aerospace manufacturing ecosystem. The Rafale jets are expected to become one of the key components of the Indian Air Force’s future fleet. The aircraft was selected by the Defence Ministry in 2012 after a long and competitive global evaluation process. No. of Rafale jets in India's inventory may go over 200 The acquisition of the Rafale aircraft is considered crucial for addressing the Indian Air Force’s operational requirements, as its squadron strength has been declining due to the retirement of ageing aircraft, including Russian-origin MiG fighter jet variants, and delays in the induction of indigenous platforms such as the LCA Mark 1A and LCA Mark 2. Also Read: Jharkhand students on hunger strike demand CM Hemant Soren’s resignation, plan state assembly gherao The Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy have previously placed orders for 62 Rafale aircraft. With the proposed acquisition of 114 Rafale aircraft, the total number of Rafales in India’s inventory could rise to 176. Besides, the Indian Navy has also expressed its intent to induct 31 more of these jets to tackle maritime threats, and that may take the number of Rafales in the country to over 200. The Defence Ministry conducted a detailed capability assessment under Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh soon after he assumed office in 2024 to address the Indian Air Force's requirements and has been working on strengthening the force’s capabilities. The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) had approved the Indian Air Force’s proposal to acquire 114 Rafale fighter jets around five months ago.

If approved, the deal is likely to generate business opportunities worth around Rs 1.6 lakh crore for Indian companies like Tata Group, Larsen &amp; Toubro, and other defence manufacturers, while significantly boosting the country’s aerospace manufacturing ecosystem.

France offers deal for 114 Rafale fighter jets, with 94 to be made in India

Since the last two weeks, the Bab al-Mandab Strait has emerged as the new flashpoint in West Asia, with Houthis declaring a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia. Amid this, Pakistan is trying to get a foothold in this strategic region by signing a defence agreement with Somalia.&nbsp;The deal was signed during Somalian defence minister Ahmed Fiqi's visit to Pakistan, where he not only met his counterpart Khawaja Asif but also held separate meetings with the chiefs of the Pakistani army and navy.&nbsp;Now, let's look at what the agreement looks like.&nbsp;According to Somalia's defence ministry, it entails strengthening cooperation in security and military capability development.&nbsp;The MOU also focuses on exchange of military knowledge and training between both sides.&nbsp;Given the threat of terror outfit Al-Shabaab, the agreement's emphasis on fostering collaboration in counter-terrorism is also interesting.&nbsp;However, neither side has thrown clarity on whether military purchases are part of the deal.&nbsp;This assumes significance, as reports had earlier suggested that Somalia was in talks with Pakistan to purchase up to 24 JF-17 fighter jets in a defence deal worth around 900 million US Dollars.&nbsp;Additionally, no timeline has been specified as well.&nbsp;But, why is this deal garnering traction?&nbsp;&nbsp;

Somalia is a key player in maritime trade and shipping, as it is adjacent to the Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, Bab al-Mandab and Indian Ocean. Thus, even without military presence per se, an agreement could help Pakistan enhance its diplomatic prowess in wake of the ongoing Houthi threat. The timing of this MOU is also key. It comes days after Somalia and Pakistan joined a Saudi Arabia-led maritime defence alliance. This group of fourteen countries have come together to secure navigation around Bab al-Mandab, which caters to nearly 7% of global crude oil trade. The new military partnerships in the region come at a time when Houthis have intensified their attacks on vessels travelling to and from Saudi Arabian ports. A day earlier, it attacked a Saudi oil tanker with ballistic missiles. Earlier this week, an Indian-flagged commercial vessel sank in the Red Sea after coming under attack from this Iran-backed group. This also marks Pakistan's growing defence footprint in Africa. In December last year, Islamabad's ambitions came to the fore when it reached a deal worth four billion US Dollars to sell military equipment such as JF-17 fighter jets to the Libyan national army. However, it reportedly put a 1.5 billion US Dollar deal to supply weapons and jets to Sudan on hold after Saudi Arabia's intervention. Pakistan's latest move is also seen as a part of its larger bid to showcase its military prowess globally. Last year, it inked a strategic mutual defence agreement with Saudi Arabia. The two countries pledged that any attack on either nation would be treated as an act of aggression against both. Pakistani army chief Asim Munir has deployed thousands of troops, fighter jets and air defence systems to Saudi Arabia. In July, Kuwait ratified a defence agreement signed with Pakistan three years ago. As per reports, the pact established a framework for cooperation between Pakistani and Kuwaiti armed forces in areas such as training, intelligence sharing, logistics and military manufacturing. With Saudi Arabia reportedly planning a land operation against Houthis and strengthening of military ties on the other side, speculation is rife yet again as to whether Pakistan will intervene militarily in West Asia.

Somalia is a key player in maritime trade and shipping, as it is adjacent to the Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, Bab al-Mandab, and Indian Ocean. Thus, even without military presence per se, an agreement could help Pakistan enhance its diplomatic prowess in the wake of the ongoing Houthi threat.

Since the last two weeks, the Bab al-Mandab Strait has emerged as the new flashpoint in West Asia, with Houthis declaring a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia. Amid this, Pakistan is trying to get a foothold in this strategic region by signing a defence agreement with Somalia. The deal was signed during Somalian defence minister Ahmed Fiqi's visit to Pakistan, where he not only met his counterpart Khawaja Asif but also held separate meetings with the chiefs of the Pakistani army and navy. Now, let's look at what the agreement looks like. According to Somalia's defence ministry, it entails strengthening cooperation in security and military capability development. The MOU also focuses on exchange of military knowledge and training between both sides. Given the threat of terror outfit Al-Shabaab, the agreement's emphasis on fostering collaboration in counter-terrorism is also interesting. However, neither side has thrown clarity on whether military purchases are part of the deal. This assumes significance, as reports had earlier suggested that Somalia was in talks with Pakistan to purchase up to 24 JF-17 fighter jets in a defence deal worth around 900 million US Dollars. Additionally, no timeline has been specified as well. But, why is this deal garnering traction?

Somalia is a key player in maritime trade and shipping, as it is adjacent to the Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, Bab al-Mandab, and Indian Ocean. Thus, even without military presence per se, an agreement could help Pakistan enhance its diplomatic prowess in the wake of the ongoing Houthi threat.

Pakistan inks defence pact with Somalia amid Houthi threat in Bab al-Mandab | Gravitas

While Iran and Oman are close to seal a deal on the Strait of Hormuz, peace in West Asia remains elusive. At a time when even US is hopeful of a deal with Iran, Israel triggered tensions yet again with strikes on Lebanon.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Iran has warned of hitting Gulf nations hard if they don’t convince Trump to end US aggression.&nbsp;Smoke was seen billowing in Southern Lebanon's Mansouri village, which is home to nearly fifteen hundred people. IDF attacked this area after issuing an evacuation order in response to Hezbollah's alleged violation of the ceasefire.&nbsp;This was the first such order issued by Israel since its ceasefire with Lebanon on June 19.&nbsp;Eight people were wounded in another IDF attack on the village of Burj al-Shemali.&nbsp;Visuals showed the extent of devastation.&nbsp;A large crater was formed following the Israeli strikes, and debris was seen everywhere.&nbsp;IDF also revealed that two of its soldiers were killed in southern Lebanon.&nbsp;A few hours earlier, people held a funeral for one of these soldiers in Jerusalem.&nbsp;Visuals also showed four Israelis being rushed to a hospital in Haifa for further treatment after being wounded in southern Lebanon.&nbsp;Ironically, Israel’s aggression comes at a time when it is holding talks with Lebanon in Rome which are being facilitated by the US.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Iran is also upping the ante on the diplomatic front. According to reports, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi conveyed to Gulf nations that his country will hit their oil, power and water plants unless they convince Trump to end US strikes on Iran. According to this warning, energy facilities, oil fields, refineries, electricity grids, water infrastructure, and transport networks would be on target. Subsequently, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reportedly spoke to Trump, urging him to delay military action on Iran and pursue a diplomatic settlement. Now, US has also flagged divisions within Iran as a key reason for the deadlock in talks. Meanwhile, Iran continues to deny holding any talks with US. Instead, it is negotiating with Oman to finalise an agreement of safe passage of vessels through Hormuz. While Iran and US agreed for reopening Hormuz to vessel traffic for 60 days, the two sides disagreed over which routes ships should take. Iran attacked several ships that had reportedly taken an Oman-approved route backed by the US. According to reports, the proposed deal may give Tehran control over ships entering Hormuz, as well as visibility over outbound traffic. It also remains to be seen when America's naval blockade will be lifted. Amid this, US has once again vented its frustration over the deadlock in talks with Iran. Since the beginning of the war, one question has been repeatedly raised—Who is actually calling the shots in Iran? Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian reignited this debate after admitting that it was very difficult to get in touch with the country's new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei. Injured in the strikes that assassinated his father on February 28, Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen in public since then. While Hezbollah is yet to break its silence on Israel's strikes, the next few hours will be crucial to determine whether tit-for-tat attacks will resume in the region yet again.

Smoke was seen billowing in Southern Lebanon's Mansouri village, which is home to nearly fifteen hundred people. IDF attacked this area after issuing an evacuation order in response to Hezbollah's alleged violation of the ceasefire.

While Iran and Oman are close to seal a deal on the Strait of Hormuz, peace in West Asia remains elusive. At a time when even US is hopeful of a deal with Iran, Israel triggered tensions yet again with strikes on Lebanon. Meanwhile, Iran has warned of hitting Gulf nations hard if they don’t convince Trump to end US aggression. Smoke was seen billowing in Southern Lebanon's Mansouri village, which is home to nearly fifteen hundred people. IDF attacked this area after issuing an evacuation order in response to Hezbollah's alleged violation of the ceasefire. This was the first such order issued by Israel since its ceasefire with Lebanon on June 19. Eight people were wounded in another IDF attack on the village of Burj al-Shemali. Visuals showed the extent of devastation. A large crater was formed following the Israeli strikes, and debris was seen everywhere. IDF also revealed that two of its soldiers were killed in southern Lebanon. A few hours earlier, people held a funeral for one of these soldiers in Jerusalem. Visuals also showed four Israelis being rushed to a hospital in Haifa for further treatment after being wounded in southern Lebanon. Ironically, Israel’s aggression comes at a time when it is holding talks with Lebanon in Rome which are being facilitated by the US.

Smoke was seen billowing in Southern Lebanon's Mansouri village, which is home to nearly fifteen hundred people. IDF attacked this area after issuing an evacuation order in response to Hezbollah's alleged violation of the ceasefire.&nbsp;

Netanyahu reignites tensions with Lebanon strikes, Iran threatens to hit Gulf states | Gravitas

A routine medical flight. A sudden loss of navigation. And now, major questions arise over whether a US military GPS-jamming exercise played a role in a deadly air ambulance crash back in May.A preliminary US government report has put the spotlight on secret electronic warfare testing and its possible impact on civilian aviation.&nbsp;&nbsp;The US National Transportation Safety Board says a C-90 air ambulance crashed into the Capitan mountains in New Mexico shortly after midnight on May 14.&nbsp;The aircraft was flying to pick up a patient when it went down, killing two pilots and two flight nurses.&nbsp;The crash also sparked a wildfire that burned thousands of acres before firefighters contained it.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to the preliminary report, the pilots contacted air traffic control soon after takeoff and reported that they had lost GPS navigation capability.&nbsp;&nbsp;The report says the controller asked military officials at the nearby White Sands Missile Range to temporarily stop GPS-jamming operations so the crew could be guided safely.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Other commercial and private pilots in the area also reported severe GPS interference that night. The military exercise had allegedly been announced in advance through aviation advisories warning of possible GPS disruptions within a 240-nautical-mile radius of White Sands Missile Range. Investigators also found major differences between the aircraft’s recorded GPS altitude and its actual flight path. The report says air traffic control later cleared the crew for a visual approach after the pilot reported losing GPS capability and needing heading guidance. The military then resumed the jamming exercise. And just minutes later, allegedly the aircraft crashed into mountainous terrain around 22 kilometres northeast of the airport. The US National Transportation Safety Board said that this is only a preliminary report and does not identify the final cause of the crash. Investigators are examining cockpit records radar data, and the possible impact of electronic warfare testing on civilian aviation.

The C-90 air ambulance crashed into the Capitan mountains in New Mexico shortly after midnight on May 14. It was flying to pick up a patient when it went down, killing two pilots and two flight nurses. The crash sparked a wildfire that burned thousands of acres.

A routine medical flight. A sudden loss of navigation. And now, major questions arise over whether a US military GPS-jamming exercise played a role in a deadly air ambulance crash back in May. A preliminary US government report has put the spotlight on secret electronic warfare testing and its possible impact on civilian aviation. The US National Transportation Safety Board says a C-90 air ambulance crashed into the Capitan mountains in New Mexico shortly after midnight on May 14. The aircraft was flying to pick up a patient when it went down, killing two pilots and two flight nurses. The crash also sparked a wildfire that burned thousands of acres before firefighters contained it. According to the preliminary report, the pilots contacted air traffic control soon after takeoff and reported that they had lost GPS navigation capability. The report says the controller asked military officials at the nearby White Sands Missile Range to temporarily stop GPS-jamming operations so the crew could be guided safely.

The C-90 air ambulance crashed into the Capitan mountains in New Mexico shortly after midnight on May 14. It was flying to pick up a patient when it went down, killing two pilots and two flight nurses. The crash sparked a wildfire that burned thousands of acres.&nbsp;

Secret weapon test blamed for US plane crash that killed four | Gravitas

The United States Navy is widely regarded as one of the world's most powerful and technologically advanced maritime forces. In December, US President Donald Trump announced plans for a new class of warships, called the "Trump Class", describing them as "some of the most lethal surface warfare ships" and the largest battleships in US history. The proposed fleet was projected to cost around $275 billion and was intended to mark the country's biggest battleship programme since World War II.&nbsp;Nearly nine months later, the ambitious plan has run into major obstacles. A report by the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) raised concerns over the project's soaring costs, construction challenges and overall feasibility. The report questioned whether American shipyards have the capacity to build such massive nuclear-powered vessels.&nbsp;According to the US Navy's 2027 Shipbuilding Plan, released in May, the Navy aims to acquire 15 battleships, each weighing around 35,000 tonnes, between 2028 and 2056. The CBO estimates the first ship would cost about $23.4 billion, while each of the remaining vessels would cost around $18 billion, significantly higher than earlier estimates based on conventional propulsion. The revised design now calls for nuclear power, driving up the projected cost.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-opens-up-on-jharkhand-student-protest-for-first-time-says-every-govt-must-1786030596513">Watch: Rahul Gandhi opens up on Jharkhand student protest for first time, says 'every govt must...'</a>&nbsp;The report also warned that the programme would place enormous pressure on the US shipbuilding industry. It said the Navy's plan would require shipbuilders to more than double production of large surface combatants by 2035, creating a major industrial challenge.&nbsp;The CBO noted that the industry is already struggling with delays and budget overruns. Last year, then US Navy Secretary John Phelan told Congress that the Navy's best-performing shipbuilding programme was six months behind schedule and 57 per cent over budget. It also highlighted that the two main builders of US surface combatants continue to face production issues, with Arleigh Burke class destroyers being delivered about five years late on average. Neither of the shipyards currently has the capability to build nuclear-powered surface warships.&nbsp;The report further said that every new class of warship comes with a steep learning curve, and first-of-their-kind vessels typically take longer to build and cost more than initially expected.&nbsp;Even if these industrial challenges are overcome, defence analysts continue to question whether investing hundreds of billions of dollars in giant battleships is the right strategy. They argue that modern conflicts in West Asia and the Russia-Ukraine war have shown that low-cost drones are increasingly shaping naval warfare.

Donald Trump's proposed $275 billion "Trump Class" battleship programme has come under scrutiny after a US Congressional Budget Office report raised concerns over rising costs, shipbuilding capacity and the project's overall feasibility.

The United States Navy is widely regarded as one of the world's most powerful and technologically advanced maritime forces. In December, US President Donald Trump announced plans for a new class of warships, called the "Trump Class", describing them as "some of the most lethal surface warfare ships" and the largest battleships in US history. The proposed fleet was projected to cost around $275 billion and was intended to mark the country's biggest battleship programme since World War II. Nearly nine months later, the ambitious plan has run into major obstacles. A report by the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) raised concerns over the project's soaring costs, construction challenges and overall feasibility. The report questioned whether American shipyards have the capacity to build such massive nuclear-powered vessels. According to the US Navy's 2027 Shipbuilding Plan, released in May, the Navy aims to acquire 15 battleships, each weighing around 35,000 tonnes, between 2028 and 2056. The CBO estimates the first ship would cost about $23.4 billion, while each of the remaining vessels would cost around $18 billion, significantly higher than earlier estimates based on conventional propulsion. The revised design now calls for nuclear power, driving up the projected cost. Also Read: Watch: Rahul Gandhi opens up on Jharkhand student protest for first time, says 'every govt must...' The report also warned that the programme would place enormous pressure on the US shipbuilding industry. It said the Navy's plan would require shipbuilders to more than double production of large surface combatants by 2035, creating a major industrial challenge. The CBO noted that the industry is already struggling with delays and budget overruns. Last year, then US Navy Secretary John Phelan told Congress that the Navy's best-performing shipbuilding programme was six months behind schedule and 57 per cent over budget. It also highlighted that the two main builders of US surface combatants continue to face production issues, with Arleigh Burke class destroyers being delivered about five years late on average. Neither of the shipyards currently has the capability to build nuclear-powered surface warships. The report further said that every new class of warship comes with a steep learning curve, and first-of-their-kind vessels typically take longer to build and cost more than initially expected. Even if these industrial challenges are overcome, defence analysts continue to question whether investing hundreds of billions of dollars in giant battleships is the right strategy. They argue that modern conflicts in West Asia and the Russia-Ukraine war have shown that low-cost drones are increasingly shaping naval warfare.

Donald Trump's proposed $275 billion "Trump Class" battleship programme has come under scrutiny after a US Congressional Budget Office report raised concerns over rising costs, shipbuilding capacity and the project's overall feasibility.

Trump's battleship fantasy gets a $275 billion reality check

Bangladesh Election Commission (EC) on Thursday announced the date for presidential election in the country. The announcement to hold elections on August 20 comes two weeks after President Mohammed Shahabuddin resigned on health grounds before completing his five-year term.&nbsp;"Chief Election Commissioner AMM Nasir Uddin has finalised the dates in consultation with (acting parliamentary) Speaker Kayser Kamal," the Election Commission's senior secretary Akhtar Ahmed told reporters.&nbsp;Election Commission Secretariat Senior Secretary Akhtar Ahmed, while announcing the election date said voting will be held from 2:00 pm to 5:00 pm at the Jatiya Sangsad (National Parliament) session hall. Chief Election Commissioner AMM Nasir Uddin would serve as the election officer, Ahmed said further.&nbsp;The deadline for filing nomination papers is Aug. 13, while scrutiny of the nominations will take place Aug. 16, Ahmed said. The last date for withdrawal of candidature is August 18.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/gen-z-gen-alpha-more-honest-than-current-generation-says-rss-chief-bhagwat-in-interaction-with-students-1786023696900">Gen Z, Gen Alpha not 'anti nationals', they are more honest' than current generation, says RSS chief Bhagwat</a>&nbsp;Traditionally, the sole candidate nominated by the ruling party wins the presidential election unopposed and there is no need for any vote but if there is more than one candidate then voting will be held in parliament on Aug 20.&nbsp;Since the introduction of parliamentary democracy in 1991, voting has taken place only once because more than one candidate contested the presidential election.&nbsp;Shahabuddin, a close ally of ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was a 1971 Liberation War veteran and former lower judiciary judge. He had taken the oath in April 2023 for a five-year term but resigned on health grounds before completing his tenure.&nbsp;

Traditionally, the sole candidate nominated by the ruling party wins the presidential election unopposed and there is no need for any vote but if there is more than one candidate then voting will be held in parliament.

Bangladesh Election Commission (EC) on Thursday announced the date for presidential election in the country. The announcement to hold elections on August 20 comes two weeks after President Mohammed Shahabuddin resigned on health grounds before completing his five-year term. "Chief Election Commissioner AMM Nasir Uddin has finalised the dates in consultation with (acting parliamentary) Speaker Kayser Kamal," the Election Commission's senior secretary Akhtar Ahmed told reporters. Election Commission Secretariat Senior Secretary Akhtar Ahmed, while announcing the election date said voting will be held from 2:00 pm to 5:00 pm at the Jatiya Sangsad (National Parliament) session hall. Chief Election Commissioner AMM Nasir Uddin would serve as the election officer, Ahmed said further. The deadline for filing nomination papers is Aug. 13, while scrutiny of the nominations will take place Aug. 16, Ahmed said. The last date for withdrawal of candidature is August 18. ALSO READ: Gen Z, Gen Alpha not 'anti nationals', they are more honest' than current generation, says RSS chief Bhagwat Traditionally, the sole candidate nominated by the ruling party wins the presidential election unopposed and there is no need for any vote but if there is more than one candidate then voting will be held in parliament on Aug 20. Since the introduction of parliamentary democracy in 1991, voting has taken place only once because more than one candidate contested the presidential election. Shahabuddin, a close ally of ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was a 1971 Liberation War veteran and former lower judiciary judge. He had taken the oath in April 2023 for a five-year term but resigned on health grounds before completing his tenure.

Traditionally, the sole candidate nominated by the ruling party wins the presidential election unopposed and there is no need for any vote but if there is more than one candidate then voting will be held in parliament.

Bangladesh announces date for presidential election after Shahabuddin's resignation

At least 30 Yemeni government troops are reported to have been killed and 15 others injured in Houthi rebel attacks on military camps in central Yemen’s Marib and Hadramawt provinces on Thursday.Yemen government sources said missiles and drones struck several camps run by the Emergency Forces in the al-Ruwaik area of Marib and al-Abr area of Hadramawt provinces.Health Minister Qasim Bahibah condemned the “treacherous” attack, saying it was intended to destabilise security and stability.&nbsp;&nbsp;Yemeni military sources said that the Houthis fired eight missiles from al-Jawf governorate, north of Marib, targeting al-Thiniya and al-Abr in Hadramout and al-Rouk in Marib.The sources added that the casualty numbers were expected to rise.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/squadron-leader-bhawana-kanth-scripts-history-as-indian-air-force-gets-its-first-woman-top-gun-pilot-1786033737342">Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot</a>&nbsp;A military spokesman for the Iran-backed Houthis, who control much of north-west Yemen, said they had targeted “large Saudi military build-ups” at the camps. A Saudi-led coalition supported the government in Yemen’s civil war.&nbsp;Thursday’s attacks on military camps, including some run by Yemen’s Emergency Forces, are the deadliest in the country’s war in years, and continue an uptick in violence in recent weeks.&nbsp;Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree claimed that the attacks carried out using missiles and drones had led to “hundreds” of casualties.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rajya-sabha-chairman-tells-rijiju-to-convey-sentiments-of-opposition-demanding-amit-shah-s-presence-1786020492879">Rajya Sabha chairman tells Rijiju to ‘convey sentiments’ of opposition demanding Amit Shah’s presence</a>&nbsp;Meanwhile, the US embassy in Yemen has described Houthi attacks in Hadramout and Marib as “cowardly”.In a post on X, the US mission paid condolences to the families of “brave Yemeni soldiers killed today”.&nbsp;The attacks “represent yet another example of terrorrism against Yemeni people,” it said.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">بشأن هجمات اليوم في حضرموت ومأرب. <a href="https://t.co/IirMLRRTNq">pic.twitter.com/IirMLRRTNq</a>&mdash; U.S. Embassy Yemen السفارة الأمريكية لدى اليمن (@USEmbassyYemen) <a href="https://x.com/USEmbassyYemen/status/2085368897994166305?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 6, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Houthis warn fighters to leave Emergency Forces camps</h2>&nbsp;A Houthi military spokesman has warned fighters in camps controlled by the Emergency Forces of Yemen’s internationally recognised government to flee.“We advise those misled and deceived among our people to leave the Saudi enemy camps and return to their homes before it is too late,” Yahya Saree said in a statement on X. “We assure our dear Yemeni people in all governorates that the armed forces are fully prepared to confront any escalation.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/jharkhand-students-on-hunger-strike-demand-cm-hemant-soren-s-resignation-plan-state-assembly-gherao-1786025129251">Jharkhand students on hunger strike demand CM Hemant Soren’s resignation, plan state assembly gherao</a>&nbsp;Saree said the group carried out attacks “using a large number of ballistic missiles and drones” and claimed the attacks resulted in the destruction of a large number of camps, troop concentrations, depots, and weapons in eastern Yemen. Local media reports said that dozens of people have been killed.&nbsp;Fighting in Yemen between the pro-Iranian Houthis and Saudi-backed government forces has intensified in recent weeks, after four years of relative calm.The Houthis have also announced a maritime blockade on Saudi Arabia, and have attacked ships linked to Yemen’s northern neighbour.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Yemeni military sources said that the Houthis fired eight missiles from al-Jawf governorate, north of Marib, targeting al-Thiniya and al-Abr in Hadramout and al-Rouk in Marib. Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree claimed that the attacks led to hundreds of casualties.

At least 30 Yemeni government troops are reported to have been killed and 15 others injured in Houthi rebel attacks on military camps in central Yemen’s Marib and Hadramawt provinces on Thursday. Yemen government sources said missiles and drones struck several camps run by the Emergency Forces in the al-Ruwaik area of Marib and al-Abr area of Hadramawt provinces. Health Minister Qasim Bahibah condemned the “treacherous” attack, saying it was intended to destabilise security and stability. Yemeni military sources said that the Houthis fired eight missiles from al-Jawf governorate, north of Marib, targeting al-Thiniya and al-Abr in Hadramout and al-Rouk in Marib. The sources added that the casualty numbers were expected to rise. Also Read: Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot A military spokesman for the Iran-backed Houthis, who control much of north-west Yemen, said they had targeted “large Saudi military build-ups” at the camps. A Saudi-led coalition supported the government in Yemen’s civil war. Thursday’s attacks on military camps, including some run by Yemen’s Emergency Forces, are the deadliest in the country’s war in years, and continue an uptick in violence in recent weeks. Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree claimed that the attacks carried out using missiles and drones had led to “hundreds” of casualties. Also Read: Rajya Sabha chairman tells Rijiju to ‘convey sentiments’ of opposition demanding Amit Shah’s presence Meanwhile, the US embassy in Yemen has described Houthi attacks in Hadramout and Marib as “cowardly”. In a post on X, the US mission paid condolences to the families of “brave Yemeni soldiers killed today”. The attacks “represent yet another example of terrorrism against Yemeni people,” it said.

Yemeni military sources said that the Houthis fired eight missiles from al-Jawf governorate, north of Marib, targeting al-Thiniya and al-Abr in Hadramout and al-Rouk in Marib. Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree claimed that the attacks led to hundreds of casualties.

At least 30 Yemeni troops killed in Houthi missile and drone attacks; toll may go up

New Delhi: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a telephone call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday, with the two leaders reviewing the progress of their countries’ special strategic partnership and exchanging views on the recent developments in West Asia.&nbsp;According to a statement from India’s PMO, the conversation focused on the sustained progress in bilateral ties. “The two leaders reviewed sustained progress in India-Israel Special Strategic Partnership and reaffirmed their commitment to further strengthening the bilateral cooperation across various sectors for the mutual benefit of the two countries,” the Prime Minister’s Office said in the statement.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/squadron-leader-bhawana-kanth-scripts-history-as-indian-air-force-gets-its-first-woman-top-gun-pilot-1786033737342">Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot</a>&nbsp;The leaders also discussed the situation in West Asia. “PM Netanyahu and PM Modi exchanged views on the recent developments in West Asia,” the release noted. No further details of those discussions were provided.&nbsp;Earlier this year, PM Modi was on a two-day state visit to Israel. This was the 2nd visit of the Indian PM to the country since 2017. The two leaders had signed multiple agreements covering critical and emerging technologies, cybersecurity, agriculture, innovation, space and economic cooperation. Discussions advanced on a free trade agreement, which is expected to be finalised soon, and a new Critical and Emerging Technologies Partnership.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/jharkhand-students-on-hunger-strike-demand-cm-hemant-soren-s-resignation-plan-state-assembly-gherao-1786025129251">Jharkhand students on hunger strike demand CM Hemant Soren’s resignation, plan state assembly gherao</a>&nbsp;India and Israel formalised their diplomatic relationship in 1992 and have since expanded cooperation in defence, agriculture, technology, water management and trade. High-level contacts, including telephone calls and in-person meetings, have been a regular feature of the relationship in recent years.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rajya-sabha-chairman-tells-rijiju-to-convey-sentiments-of-opposition-demanding-amit-shah-s-presence-1786020492879">Rajya Sabha chairman tells Rijiju to ‘convey sentiments’ of opposition demanding Amit Shah’s presence</a>

Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a telephone call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the two leaders reviewed sustained progress in India-Israel Special Strategic Partnership besides discussing the emerging situation in West Asia.

New Delhi: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a telephone call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday, with the two leaders reviewing the progress of their countries’ special strategic partnership and exchanging views on the recent developments in West Asia. According to a statement from India’s PMO, the conversation focused on the sustained progress in bilateral ties. “The two leaders reviewed sustained progress in India-Israel Special Strategic Partnership and reaffirmed their commitment to further strengthening the bilateral cooperation across various sectors for the mutual benefit of the two countries,” the Prime Minister’s Office said in the statement. Also Read: Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot The leaders also discussed the situation in West Asia. “PM Netanyahu and PM Modi exchanged views on the recent developments in West Asia,” the release noted. No further details of those discussions were provided. Earlier this year, PM Modi was on a two-day state visit to Israel. This was the 2nd visit of the Indian PM to the country since 2017. The two leaders had signed multiple agreements covering critical and emerging technologies, cybersecurity, agriculture, innovation, space and economic cooperation. Discussions advanced on a free trade agreement, which is expected to be finalised soon, and a new Critical and Emerging Technologies Partnership. Also Read: Jharkhand students on hunger strike demand CM Hemant Soren’s resignation, plan state assembly gherao India and Israel formalised their diplomatic relationship in 1992 and have since expanded cooperation in defence, agriculture, technology, water management and trade. High-level contacts, including telephone calls and in-person meetings, have been a regular feature of the relationship in recent years. Also Read: Rajya Sabha chairman tells Rijiju to ‘convey sentiments’ of opposition demanding Amit Shah’s presence

Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a telephone call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the two leaders reviewed sustained progress in India-Israel Special Strategic Partnership besides discussing the emerging situation in West Asia.

Indian, Israeli PMs discuss strategic partnership, West Asia situation

A Republican-led US Senate committee on Thursday (August 06) approved a motion to hold former top infectious diseases expert Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he refused to answer questions during a hearing on the Covid-19 pandemic.&nbsp;Fauci, 85, invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during his appearance before the Senate Homeland Security Committee last week. His lawyers advised him not to respond to questions from Republican lawmakers.&nbsp;The committee questioned Fauci over allegations that information related to the origins of the Covid 19 pandemic had been concealed. Fauci declined to answer, citing his constitutional rights.&nbsp;Ahead of the hearing, committee chairman Senator Rand Paul released thousands of pages from Fauci's personal diary.&nbsp;Fauci later said his legal team believed the questioning was designed to draw him into statements that could expose him to perjury charges. Based on that advice, he chose to remain silent throughout the hearing.<h2>Contempt recommendation heads to Justice Department</h2>The contempt recommendation was approved along party lines following an initiative led by Rand Paul, who had earlier subpoenaed Fauci to testify. Paul said he plans to forward the committee's recommendation directly to the Justice Department, which will decide whether to take further action.&nbsp;The move departs from the usual process, under which contempt resolutions are generally considered by the full Senate before being referred further. The decision could raise legal and political questions for President Donald Trump's administration.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pm-modi-s-foreign-visits-cost-74-59-crore-in-2026-till-july-2025-recorded-highest-spending-1786014940930">PM Modi's foreign visits cost ₹74.59 crore in 2026 till July; 2025 recorded highest spending</a><h2>Democrats slam committee's decision</h2>Democratic lawmakers on the panel opposed the contempt vote and questioned the way the investigation had been conducted.&nbsp;Senator Gary Peters described it as a "rushed investigation."&nbsp;He said the vote could “harm our ability to conduct future investigations and disregards constitutional protections long recognised by the US Senate, all without making a reliable case that there is a legal basis for holding Dr Fauci in contempt.”&nbsp;The hearing marked another chapter in the long-running dispute between Fauci and Rand Paul over the origins of Covid-19. Paul has repeatedly alleged, without substantiated evidence, that the pandemic originated in a laboratory and that its origins were concealed.

A Republican led US Senate committee voted to recommend contempt proceedings against former infectious diseases expert Anthony Fauci after he invoked his Fifth Amendment right during a hearing on the origins of the Covid 19 pandemic.

A Republican-led US Senate committee on Thursday (August 06) approved a motion to hold former top infectious diseases expert Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he refused to answer questions during a hearing on the Covid-19 pandemic. Fauci, 85, invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during his appearance before the Senate Homeland Security Committee last week. His lawyers advised him not to respond to questions from Republican lawmakers. The committee questioned Fauci over allegations that information related to the origins of the Covid 19 pandemic had been concealed. Fauci declined to answer, citing his constitutional rights. Ahead of the hearing, committee chairman Senator Rand Paul released thousands of pages from Fauci's personal diary. Fauci later said his legal team believed the questioning was designed to draw him into statements that could expose him to perjury charges. Based on that advice, he chose to remain silent throughout the hearing. Contempt recommendation heads to Justice Department The contempt recommendation was approved along party lines following an initiative led by Rand Paul, who had earlier subpoenaed Fauci to testify. Paul said he plans to forward the committee's recommendation directly to the Justice Department, which will decide whether to take further action. The move departs from the usual process, under which contempt resolutions are generally considered by the full Senate before being referred further. The decision could raise legal and political questions for President Donald Trump's administration. Also Read: PM Modi's foreign visits cost ₹74.59 crore in 2026 till July; 2025 recorded highest spending Democrats slam committee's decision Democratic lawmakers on the panel opposed the contempt vote and questioned the way the investigation had been conducted. Senator Gary Peters described it as a "rushed investigation." He said the vote could “harm our ability to conduct future investigations and disregards constitutional protections long recognised by the US Senate, all without making a reliable case that there is a legal basis for holding Dr Fauci in contempt.” The hearing marked another chapter in the long-running dispute between Fauci and Rand Paul over the origins of Covid-19. Paul has repeatedly alleged, without substantiated evidence, that the pandemic originated in a laboratory and that its origins were concealed.

A Republican-led US Senate committee voted to recommend contempt proceedings against former infectious diseases expert Anthony Fauci after he invoked his Fifth Amendment right during a hearing on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.

US Senate panel recommends contempt action against Anthony Fauci over Covid hearing

United Nations rights experts on Thursday (August 06) urged the international community to act quickly, warning that expanding US sanctions could push Cuba into a "full-blown crisis" and worsen the humanitarian situation on the island.&nbsp;Cuba has been under a US trade embargo since 1962. However, the experts said pressure has intensified in recent months after President Donald Trump expanded economic measures, including restrictions affecting the country's fuel supplies.&nbsp;The experts said the latest sanctions announced on July 23 targeted Cuba's energy sector, making fuel procurement even more difficult, including for humanitarian purposes. The measures came as the country faces acute fuel shortages and recently experienced its third major nationwide blackout.&nbsp;"The humanitarian consequences are already unfolding into a full-blown crisis, threatening the health rights, to life, to food and to development," the experts said. They also pointed to reports of uncollected waste in parts of Havana, warning that it has increased the risk of disease outbreaks.<h2>Trump's Cuba policy under scrutiny</h2>The experts said the US has expanded unilateral sanctions targeting key sectors of Cuba's economy since June 2026.&nbsp;Under Trump's second administration, an Executive Order signed in January 2026 declared a national emergency regarding Cuba and authorised US tariffs on countries supplying crude oil to the island.&nbsp;Another signed in May imposed secondary sanctions on non-US entities and foreign financial institutions that conduct business with Cuban state institutions or the military-run conglomerate GAESA.&nbsp;Experts said living conditions have worsened since the energy restrictions began in January. Millions of Cubans now struggle to access water, food and transport, while shortages of medicines and other essential supplies continue to grow.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pm-modi-s-foreign-visits-cost-74-59-crore-in-2026-till-july-2025-recorded-highest-spending-1786014940930">PM Modi's foreign visits cost ₹74.59 crore in 2026 till July; 2025 recorded highest spending</a><h2>UN calls for immediate global response</h2>The experts said UN agencies working in Cuba have already warned of rising food insecurity and shortages of medicines and basic necessities.&nbsp;"Food must never be used as an instrument of political pressure. Measures that knowingly deprive a population of the means to survive strike at the most basic guarantees of the rights to life and diminish the core of human dignity," they said.&nbsp;"The US government must cease all threats and hostile acts against Cuba's sovereignty and revoke all measures it has imposed on the country that stand contrary to international law."&nbsp;The experts urged the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly to take up the issue urgently as a matter of international peace and security. The statement was issued by UN special rapporteurs, who serve independently under mandates from the Human Rights Council and do not speak on behalf of the United Nations.

US sanctions push Cuba into full blown crisis, UN experts urge UN actionUN rights experts warned that expanding US sanctions are pushing Cuba into a full blown humanitarian crisis and urged the international community to take urgent action to prevent the situation from worsening.

United Nations rights experts on Thursday (August 06) urged the international community to act quickly, warning that expanding US sanctions could push Cuba into a "full-blown crisis" and worsen the humanitarian situation on the island. Cuba has been under a US trade embargo since 1962. However, the experts said pressure has intensified in recent months after President Donald Trump expanded economic measures, including restrictions affecting the country's fuel supplies. The experts said the latest sanctions announced on July 23 targeted Cuba's energy sector, making fuel procurement even more difficult, including for humanitarian purposes. The measures came as the country faces acute fuel shortages and recently experienced its third major nationwide blackout. "The humanitarian consequences are already unfolding into a full-blown crisis, threatening the health rights, to life, to food and to development," the experts said. They also pointed to reports of uncollected waste in parts of Havana, warning that it has increased the risk of disease outbreaks. Trump's Cuba policy under scrutiny The experts said the US has expanded unilateral sanctions targeting key sectors of Cuba's economy since June 2026. Under Trump's second administration, an Executive Order signed in January 2026 declared a national emergency regarding Cuba and authorised US tariffs on countries supplying crude oil to the island. Another signed in May imposed secondary sanctions on non-US entities and foreign financial institutions that conduct business with Cuban state institutions or the military-run conglomerate GAESA. Experts said living conditions have worsened since the energy restrictions began in January. Millions of Cubans now struggle to access water, food and transport, while shortages of medicines and other essential supplies continue to grow. Also Read: PM Modi's foreign visits cost ₹74.59 crore in 2026 till July; 2025 recorded highest spending UN calls for immediate global response The experts said UN agencies working in Cuba have already warned of rising food insecurity and shortages of medicines and basic necessities. "Food must never be used as an instrument of political pressure. Measures that knowingly deprive a population of the means to survive strike at the most basic guarantees of the rights to life and diminish the core of human dignity," they said. "The US government must cease all threats and hostile acts against Cuba's sovereignty and revoke all measures it has imposed on the country that stand contrary to international law." The experts urged the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly to take up the issue urgently as a matter of international peace and security. The statement was issued by UN special rapporteurs, who serve independently under mandates from the Human Rights Council and do not speak on behalf of the United Nations.

US sanctions push Cuba into full blown crisis, UN experts urge UN actionUN rights experts warned that expanding US sanctions are pushing Cuba into a full blown humanitarian crisis and urged the international community to take urgent action to prevent the situation from worsening.

US sanctions pushing Cuba into full blown crisis: UN experts urge Security Council action

Meta AI is being given standing permission to act. The assistant can now be set up once to perform tasks on a schedule, then left alone to carry them out without further instruction.&nbsp;What It Does&nbsp;The new capabilities, powered by Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 model, shift Meta AI from a system that answers when spoken to into one that operates on its own timetable.&nbsp;It can generate a daily briefing drawn from a connected calendar, flagging conflicts such as double bookings and delivering the summary at a set time. Users can configure recurring tasks — a weekly meal plan, an alert when a product is restocked, an afternoon update on topics they follow — and the assistant runs them without being re-prompted.&nbsp;Meta is releasing the features in select markets first, through the Meta AI app and meta.ai, with plans to expand to further regions and platforms including WhatsApp. Reporting on the rollout indicates the agent capabilities extend to calendar and email automation in browser environments.&nbsp;Why Autonomy Is The Industry's Current Direction&nbsp;Meta is not moving alone here. The whole sector is converging on agents — systems that take an objective and execute the steps themselves, rather than returning text for a human to act on. It is where the commercial value is presumed to be: an assistant that answers questions saves a user minutes, while one that completes tasks replaces work.&nbsp;The technical requirement is access. For an assistant to summarise your calendar it must read your calendar. To flag a restock it must monitor a retailer. To automate email it must reach your inbox. Each capability requires permissions that persist between sessions, because the assistant is by design acting while you are not watching.&nbsp;The Question This Raises For Meta Specifically&nbsp;Every company deploying autonomous agents faces the same reliability problem, and it is genuinely hard. What makes Meta's rollout worth examining is the record its automated systems have compiled on the same platforms during the same period.&nbsp;Meta has removed more than 10 million accounts in a crackdown it says targeted bots and fake engagement. A New York Times investigation this month documented business owners whose accounts were disabled under vague categories such as fraud and deception, with no specific violating post identified and appeals rejected within days as final. Meta's own Oversight Board found systemic problems with due process, proportionality and transparency in how the company disables accounts, and recommended Meta disclose what role AI plays in those decisions — a recommendation that exists because it currently does not.&nbsp;Separately, a BBC Eye investigation found Instagram's AI-driven advertisement review approving paid ads promoting child sexual abuse material in India, prompting a summons from India's IT ministry and a warning over Meta's safe harbour protection. Meta's ad review runs primarily on AI, with a human seeing an advertisement only when the system itself is uncertain.&nbsp;In each case the failure mode was the same: an automated system acting confidently, without human review, on a judgement it had got wrong — and the affected user discovering it afterwards, with no meaningful appeal.&nbsp;The Difference Autonomy Makes&nbsp;That history does not mean the new features will fail. Scheduled task execution is a narrower, more constrained problem than open-ended content moderation, and reading a calendar to produce a summary is far more tractable than deciding whether an account is fraudulent.&nbsp;But autonomy changes the shape of any error. A chatbot that answers a question wrongly produces a wrong answer, which the user reads and evaluates immediately. An agent operating on a schedule, with access to a calendar and an inbox, acting while nobody is watching, produces errors that are discovered later — after the action has already been taken.&nbsp;The company asking users for that standing permission is the same one whose Oversight Board says it will not disclose what role its AI plays in decisions that can close a business overnight. Users granting Meta AI access to their calendars and inboxes are extending trust in one direction while Meta declines to extend transparency in the other.

Meta is rolling out autonomous capabilities letting Meta AI run recurring tasks unprompted — daily calendar briefings, meal plans, restock alerts — powered by Muse Spark 1.1. It arrives as Meta's automated systems face scrutiny over wrongful bans and ad-review failures.

Meta AI is being given standing permission to act. The assistant can now be set up once to perform tasks on a schedule, then left alone to carry them out without further instruction. What It Does The new capabilities, powered by Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 model, shift Meta AI from a system that answers when spoken to into one that operates on its own timetable. It can generate a daily briefing drawn from a connected calendar, flagging conflicts such as double bookings and delivering the summary at a set time. Users can configure recurring tasks — a weekly meal plan, an alert when a product is restocked, an afternoon update on topics they follow — and the assistant runs them without being re-prompted. Meta is releasing the features in select markets first, through the Meta AI app and meta.ai, with plans to expand to further regions and platforms including WhatsApp. Reporting on the rollout indicates the agent capabilities extend to calendar and email automation in browser environments. Why Autonomy Is The Industry's Current Direction Meta is not moving alone here. The whole sector is converging on agents — systems that take an objective and execute the steps themselves, rather than returning text for a human to act on. It is where the commercial value is presumed to be: an assistant that answers questions saves a user minutes, while one that completes tasks replaces work. The technical requirement is access. For an assistant to summarise your calendar it must read your calendar. To flag a restock it must monitor a retailer. To automate email it must reach your inbox. Each capability requires permissions that persist between sessions, because the assistant is by design acting while you are not watching. The Question This Raises For Meta Specifically Every company deploying autonomous agents faces the same reliability problem, and it is genuinely hard. What makes Meta's rollout worth examining is the record its automated systems have compiled on the same platforms during the same period. Meta has removed more than 10 million accounts in a crackdown it says targeted bots and fake engagement. A New York Times investigation this month documented business owners whose accounts were disabled under vague categories such as fraud and deception, with no specific violating post identified and appeals rejected within days as final. Meta's own Oversight Board found systemic problems with due process, proportionality and transparency in how the company disables accounts, and recommended Meta disclose what role AI plays in those decisions — a recommendation that exists because it currently does not. Separately, a BBC Eye investigation found Instagram's AI-driven advertisement review approving paid ads promoting child sexual abuse material in India, prompting a summons from India's IT ministry and a warning over Meta's safe harbour protection. Meta's ad review runs primarily on AI, with a human seeing an advertisement only when the system itself is uncertain. In each case the failure mode was the same: an automated system acting confidently, without human review, on a judgement it had got wrong — and the affected user discovering it afterwards, with no meaningful appeal. The Difference Autonomy Makes That history does not mean the new features will fail. Scheduled task execution is a narrower, more constrained problem than open-ended content moderation, and reading a calendar to produce a summary is far more tractable than deciding whether an account is fraudulent. But autonomy changes the shape of any error. A chatbot that answers a question wrongly produces a wrong answer, which the user reads and evaluates immediately. An agent operating on a schedule, with access to a calendar and an inbox, acting while nobody is watching, produces errors that are discovered later — after the action has already been taken. The company asking users for that standing permission is the same one whose Oversight Board says it will not disclose what role its AI plays in decisions that can close a business overnight. Users granting Meta AI access to their calendars and inboxes are extending trust in one direction while Meta declines to extend transparency in the other.

Meta is rolling out autonomous capabilities for Meta AI, letting the assistant carry out recurring tasks on a schedule without being prompted each time — daily briefings pulled from a user's calendar, weekly meal plans, restock alerts and trend updates. Powered by the new Muse Spark 1.1 model, it is launching in select markets, with WhatsApp to follow.

Zuckerberg's Meta gives autonomous power to its AI which is already struggling to take correct decisions

The Union government spent around ₹74.59 crore on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign visits between February and July 2026, according to details shared by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday (August 06).&nbsp;The expenditure covered official visits to countries including Malaysia, Israel, the UAE, Italy, France, Australia, New Zealand and several others.&nbsp;In a written reply, Minister of State for External Affairs Pabitra Margherita said the government has also placed on record the year-wise and visit-wise expenditure incurred on the Prime Minister's overseas visits since 2021.<h2>2026 expenditure at ₹74.59 crore so far</h2>The MEA said the total spending on the Prime Minister's foreign visits in 2026 stood at about ₹74.59 crore till July. The amount includes visits undertaken between February and July this year.&nbsp;Among the major expenditures, the Norway visit cost ₹17.46 crore, followed by Israel at ₹11.92 crore, Seychelles at ₹8.22 crore, Sweden at ₹6.33 crore, Malaysia at ₹5.57 crore and New Zealand at ₹5.44 crore.&nbsp;The government said the expenditure for some visits, including those to France and several countries covered during the May tour, remains provisional and will be finalised after all bills are settled.<h2>2025 recorded the highest annual expenditure</h2>The data showed that 2025 recorded the highest spending on the Prime Minister's foreign visits during the period covered in the reply, with total expenditure of around ₹187.83 crore.&nbsp;During the year, Modi visited France, the US, Mauritius, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Saudi Arabia, Cyprus, Canada, Croatia, Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, Namibia, the UK, Maldives, China, Japan, Bhutan, South Africa, Jordan, Oman and Ethiopia.&nbsp;Among the highest expenditures, the France visit cost ₹25.60 crore, followed by Brazil at ₹17.72 crore, the US at ₹16.55 crore, Saudi Arabia at ₹15.54 crore, China at ₹10.60 crore and the UK at ₹9.92 crore.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-denies-us-missile-stockpile-shortage-warns-leakers-of-prosecution-and-jail-1786013306970">Trump denies US missile stockpile shortage, warns leakers of prosecution and jail</a><h2>2024 foreign visit expenditure crossed ₹109 crore</h2>The government spent about ₹109.51 crore on the Prime Minister's overseas visits in 2024.During the year, Modi travelled to the UAE, Qatar, Bhutan, Italy, Russia, Austria, Poland, Ukraine, Brunei, Singapore, the US, Laos, Nigeria, Brazil, Guyana and Kuwait.&nbsp;The US visit cost ₹15.34 crore, while the Italy visit amounted to ₹14.37 crore. The October visit to Russia cost ₹10.75 crore, followed by Poland at ₹10.10 crore and Singapore at ₹7.75 crore.<h2>Visits aim to foster closer ties&nbsp;</h2>"High-level visits by the Prime Minister are established means of fostering closer relations with foreign countries and promoting India’s engagements at bilateral, regional and global levels. These visits, and the understandings and agreements concluded therein, facilitate the strengthening of partnerships across a wide range of sectors, including technology, innovation, trade &amp; investment, defence and energy cooperation, and resilient supply chains, among others," the MEA said

The Centre spent ₹74.59 crore on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign visits till July 2026, while 2025 recorded the highest annual expenditure, the government informed the Rajya Sabha.

The Union government spent around ₹74.59 crore on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign visits between February and July 2026, according to details shared by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday (August 06). The expenditure covered official visits to countries including Malaysia, Israel, the UAE, Italy, France, Australia, New Zealand and several others. In a written reply, Minister of State for External Affairs Pabitra Margherita said the government has also placed on record the year-wise and visit-wise expenditure incurred on the Prime Minister's overseas visits since 2021. 2026 expenditure at ₹74.59 crore so far The MEA said the total spending on the Prime Minister's foreign visits in 2026 stood at about ₹74.59 crore till July. The amount includes visits undertaken between February and July this year. Among the major expenditures, the Norway visit cost ₹17.46 crore, followed by Israel at ₹11.92 crore, Seychelles at ₹8.22 crore, Sweden at ₹6.33 crore, Malaysia at ₹5.57 crore and New Zealand at ₹5.44 crore. The government said the expenditure for some visits, including those to France and several countries covered during the May tour, remains provisional and will be finalised after all bills are settled. 2025 recorded the highest annual expenditure The data showed that 2025 recorded the highest spending on the Prime Minister's foreign visits during the period covered in the reply, with total expenditure of around ₹187.83 crore. During the year, Modi visited France, the US, Mauritius, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Saudi Arabia, Cyprus, Canada, Croatia, Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, Namibia, the UK, Maldives, China, Japan, Bhutan, South Africa, Jordan, Oman and Ethiopia. Among the highest expenditures, the France visit cost ₹25.60 crore, followed by Brazil at ₹17.72 crore, the US at ₹16.55 crore, Saudi Arabia at ₹15.54 crore, China at ₹10.60 crore and the UK at ₹9.92 crore. Also Read: Trump denies US missile stockpile shortage, warns leakers of prosecution and jail 2024 foreign visit expenditure crossed ₹109 crore The government spent about ₹109.51 crore on the Prime Minister's overseas visits in 2024. During the year, Modi travelled to the UAE, Qatar, Bhutan, Italy, Russia, Austria, Poland, Ukraine, Brunei, Singapore, the US, Laos, Nigeria, Brazil, Guyana and Kuwait. The US visit cost ₹15.34 crore, while the Italy visit amounted to ₹14.37 crore. The October visit to Russia cost ₹10.75 crore, followed by Poland at ₹10.10 crore and Singapore at ₹7.75 crore. Visits aim to foster closer ties "High-level visits by the Prime Minister are established means of fostering closer relations with foreign countries and promoting India’s engagements at bilateral, regional and global levels. These visits, and the understandings and agreements concluded therein, facilitate the strengthening of partnerships across a wide range of sectors, including technology, innovation, trade & investment, defence and energy cooperation, and resilient supply chains, among others," the MEA said

The Centre spent ₹74.59 crore on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign visits till July 2026, while 2025 recorded the highest annual expenditure, the government informed the Rajya Sabha.

PM Modi's foreign visits cost ₹74.59 crore in 2026 till July; 2025 recorded highest spending

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

PoK polls: Pakistan postpones third phase voting amid ongoing unrest

Student's chilling words: 'I was standing in front when the teacher was shot'

21 court losses later, Donald Trump's fight over voter rolls is far from over

Explained: Why Taiwan's president took part in a 'decapitation strike' drill

Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan seal landmark Makkah Joint Defence Agreement

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Thailand teen killed grandparents before shooting teachers at school

From Kiribati to France: Which countries spend the most? Check India’s rank

India at 80: From ‘Tryst with Destiny’ to Viksit Bharat—A view from Sri Lanka

At least 4 killed 15 injured in shooting at school near Bangkok

Did Trump admit some US munitions supplies were limited? What he said

'Massive attack coming... wait, never mind': Iran mocks US 'theatre diplomacy'

US may force more visa applicants to make social media accounts public under Trump's new plan

Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order

France offers deal for 114 Rafale fighter jets, with 94 to be made in India

Pakistan inks defence pact with Somalia amid Houthi threat in Bab al-Mandab

Israel strikes Lebanon, reignites tensions; Iran threatens to hit Gulf states

Secret weapon test blamed for US plane crash that killed four | Gravitas

Trump's battleship fantasy gets a $275 billion reality check

Bangladesh announces presidential election date after Shahabuddin's resignation

At least 30 Yemeni troops killed in Houthi attacks; toll may go up

Indian, Israeli PMs discuss strategic partnership, West Asia situation

US Senate panel votes to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt over Covid hearing

US sanctions pushing Cuba into full blown crisis: UN experts urge global action