
A leading scientist on theWHO's COVID-19 mission toChinasaid on Tuesday that a follow-up trip could be helpful to gather additional research on the origins of the disease, but should be separate from any audit of information provided by Beijing.
The comments from Dutch virologist Marion Koopmans came after the United States called on Tuesday for international experts to be allowed to evaluate the source of the coronavirus and the early days of the outbreak in a second phase of theWHO's investigation into the origins of the coronavirus.
Koopmans was part of theWHO-led team which spent four weeks inChinaearlier this year and in March published a report jointly with Chinese scientists that said the virus had probably been transmitted from bats to humans through another animal.
Also Read |Covid lab origin theory gains traction in United States
"Introduction through a laboratory incident was considered to be an extremely unlikely pathway," its report said.
Discussions about the outbreak gained renewed attention this week as USintelligence agencies examine reports that researchers at a Chinese virology laboratory in Wuhan were seriously ill in 2019 a month before the first cases of COVID-19 were reported.
Also Read |Fauci admits Wuhan lab received 'modest' funds from US amid calls for probe into Covid origins
USgovernment sources have said there is still no proof the disease originated at the lab.
Koopmans said the team would be eager to carry out additional research inChinain a number of areas and was awaiting the outcome ofWHOdiscussions. She stressed the need for a clear mandate to conduct research, not to carry out an audit.
Also Read |Wuhan virus lab leak theory: Why China has blocked access to Yunnan mine
"I think these cannot be combined. So we believe that is a combination that will not work. In that case you say we are going to carry out an inspection, or we are going to do the follow-up research, or both, but through different mechanisms, otherwise you simply will not make any progress," she said.