National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

As Artificial Intelligence continues to grow across various fields, an AI startup CEO has warned of its impending dangers, which he described as “much bigger than COVID”. In an article titled ‘Something Big Is Happening’, Hyperwrite CEO Matt Shumer said that AI will eliminate 50 per cent of entry-level white-collar jobs in the coming years. He added that the latest models have the capability for massive disruption, which can happen by the end of this year. He further warned that AI is now building itself, making it even more intelligent.“I’m going to be direct with you because I think you deserve honesty more than comfort,” Shumer wrote in the nearly 5-word X post published on Tuesday (Feb 10). “Dario Amodei, who is probably the most safety-focused CEO in the AI industry, has publicly predicted that AI will eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years. And many people in the industry think he's being conservative. Given what the latest models can do, the capability for massive disruption could be here by the end of this year. It'll take some time to ripple through the economy, but the underlying ability is arriving now.”“I’ve spent six years building an AI startup and investing in the space. I live in this world. And I’m writing this for the people in my life who don’t... my family, my friends, the people I care about who keep asking me ‘so what’s the deal with AI?’ and getting an answer that doesn’t do justice to what’s actually happening,” he added. “But the gap between what I've been saying and what is actually happening has gotten far too big. The people I care about deserve to hear what is coming, even if it sounds crazy.”Shumer described how he has already felt the dangers of AI in his work. “I am no longer needed for the actual technical work of my job,” he said. He went on to describe how a simple command can build what he wants, with no further corrections needed. He said that the AI does it better than he could.

<h2>AI is building itself</h2>He said that it was the GPT-5.3 Codex model, which was released last week, that “shook” him the most. “It wasn’t just executing my instructions. It was making intelligent decisions. It had something that felt, for the first time, like judgment. Like taste. The inexplicable sense of knowing what the right call is that people always said AI would never have. This model has it, or something close enough that the distinction is starting not to matter,” he wrote.Shumer warned that “AI is now building the next AI.” He then cited a document released by OpenAI on its GPT-5.3 Codex, which read: “GPT-5.3-Codex is our first model that was instrumental in creating itself. The Codex team used early versions to debug its own training, manage its own deployment, and diagnose test results and evaluations.”“Read that again. The AI helped build itself,” Shumer said. “This isn't a prediction about what might happen someday. This is OpenAI telling you, right now, that the AI they just released was used to create itself.”He further said that the current gap between public perception and reality is “dangerous” because it is preventing people from preparing, saying that most people are using free versions of AI tools that are more than a year behind what paying users have access to. “The people paying for the best tools, and actually using them daily for real work, know what's coming.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://t.co/ivXRKXJvQg">https://t.co/ivXRKXJvQg</a>&mdash; Matt Shumer (@mattshumer_) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattshumer_/status/2021256989876109403?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Hyperwrite CEO Matt Shumer warns AI could wipe out 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within years, saying advanced models are already building and improving themselves, accelerating disruption.

As Artificial Intelligence continues to grow across various fields, an AI startup CEO has warned of its impending dangers, which he described as “much bigger than COVID”. In an article titled ‘Something Big Is Happening’, Hyperwrite CEO Matt Shumer said that AI will eliminate 50 per cent of entry-level white-collar jobs in the coming years. He added that the latest models have the capability for massive disruption, which can happen by the end of this year. He further warned that AI is now building itself, making it even more intelligent. “I’m going to be direct with you because I think you deserve honesty more than comfort,” Shumer wrote in the nearly 5-word X post published on Tuesday (Feb 10). “Dario Amodei, who is probably the most safety-focused CEO in the AI industry, has publicly predicted that AI will eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years. And many people in the industry think he's being conservative. Given what the latest models can do, the capability for massive disruption could be here by the end of this year. It'll take some time to ripple through the economy, but the underlying ability is arriving now.” “I’ve spent six years building an AI startup and investing in the space. I live in this world. And I’m writing this for the people in my life who don’t... my family, my friends, the people I care about who keep asking me ‘so what’s the deal with AI?’ and getting an answer that doesn’t do justice to what’s actually happening,” he added. “But the gap between what I've been saying and what is actually happening has gotten far too big. The people I care about deserve to hear what is coming, even if it sounds crazy.” Shumer described how he has already felt the dangers of AI in his work. “I am no longer needed for the actual technical work of my job,” he said. He went on to describe how a simple command can build what he wants, with no further corrections needed. He said that the AI does it better than he could.

Hyperwrite CEO Matt Shumer warns AI could wipe out 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within years, saying advanced models are already building and improving themselves, accelerating disruption.

AI is building itself? CEO’s chilling ‘much bigger than COVID’ warning goes viral

Instagram chief Adam Mosseri is to be called to testify Wednesday in a Los Angeles courtroom by lawyers out to prove social media is dangerously addictive by design to young, vulnerable minds.YouTube and Meta -- the parent company of Instagram and Facebook -- are defendants in a blockbuster trial that could set a legal precedent regarding whether social media giants deliberately designed their platforms to be addictive to children.Rival lawyers made opening remarks to jurors this week, with an attorney for YouTube insisting that the Google-owned video platform was neither intentionally addictive nor technically social media."It's not social media addiction when it's not social media, and it's not addiction," YouTube lawyer Luis Li told the 12 jurors during his opening remarks.The civil trial in California state court centres on allegations that a 20-year-old woman, identified as Kaley G.M., suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child.She started using YouTube at six and joined Instagram at 11, before moving on to Snapchat and TikTok two or three years later.The plaintiff "is not addicted to YouTube. You can listen to her own words -- she said so, her doctor said so, her father said so," Li said, citing evidence he said would be detailed at trial.Li's opening arguments followed remarks on Monday from lawyers for the plaintiffs and co-defendant Meta.On Monday, the plaintiffs' attorney Mark Lanier told the jury that YouTube and Meta both engineer addiction in young people's brains to gain users and profits."This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," Lanier said."They don't only build apps; they build traps."But Li told the six men and six women on the jury that he did not recognise the description of YouTube put forth by the other side and tried to draw a clear line between YouTube's widely popular video app and social media platforms like Instagram or TikTok.YouTube is selling "the ability to watch something essentially for free on your computer, on your phone, on your iPad," Li insisted, comparing the service to Netflix or traditional TV.Li said it was the quality of content that kept users coming back, citing internal company emails that he said showed executives rejecting a pursuit of internet virality in favour of educational and more socially useful content.<h2>‘Gateway drug’</h2>Stanford University School of Medicine professor Anna Lembke, the first witness called by the plaintiffs, testified that she views social media, broadly speaking, as a drug.The part of the brain that acts as a brake when it comes to having another hit is not typically developed before a person is 25 years old, Lembke, the author of the book "Dopamine Nation," told jurors."Which is why teenagers will often take risks that they shouldn't and not appreciate future consequences," Lembke testified."And typically, the gateway drug is the most easily accessible drug," she said, describing Kaley's first use of YouTube at the age of six.The case is being treated as a bellwether proceeding whose outcome could set the tone for a wave of similar litigation across the United States.Social media firms face hundreds of lawsuits accusing them of leading young users to become addicted to content and suffer from depression, eating disorders, psychiatric hospitalisation, and even suicide.Lawyers for the plaintiffs are borrowing strategies used in the 1990s and 2000s against the tobacco industry, which faced a similar onslaught of lawsuits arguing that companies knowingly sold a harmful product.Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.&nbsp;

The civil trial in California state court centres on allegations that a 20-year-old woman, identified as Kaley G.M., suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child.

Instagram chief Adam Mosseri is to be called to testify Wednesday in a Los Angeles courtroom by lawyers out to prove social media is dangerously addictive by design to young, vulnerable minds. YouTube and Meta -- the parent company of Instagram and Facebook -- are defendants in a blockbuster trial that could set a legal precedent regarding whether social media giants deliberately designed their platforms to be addictive to children. Rival lawyers made opening remarks to jurors this week, with an attorney for YouTube insisting that the Google-owned video platform was neither intentionally addictive nor technically social media. "It's not social media addiction when it's not social media, and it's not addiction," YouTube lawyer Luis Li told the 12 jurors during his opening remarks. The civil trial in California state court centres on allegations that a 20-year-old woman, identified as Kaley G.M., suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child. She started using YouTube at six and joined Instagram at 11, before moving on to Snapchat and TikTok two or three years later. The plaintiff "is not addicted to YouTube. You can listen to her own words -- she said so, her doctor said so, her father said so," Li said, citing evidence he said would be detailed at trial. Li's opening arguments followed remarks on Monday from lawyers for the plaintiffs and co-defendant Meta. On Monday, the plaintiffs' attorney Mark Lanier told the jury that YouTube and Meta both engineer addiction in young people's brains to gain users and profits. "This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," Lanier said. "They don't only build apps; they build traps." But Li told the six men and six women on the jury that he did not recognise the description of YouTube put forth by the other side and tried to draw a clear line between YouTube's widely popular video app and social media platforms like Instagram or TikTok. YouTube is selling "the ability to watch something essentially for free on your computer, on your phone, on your iPad," Li insisted, comparing the service to Netflix or traditional TV. Li said it was the quality of content that kept users coming back, citing internal company emails that he said showed executives rejecting a pursuit of internet virality in favour of educational and more socially useful content. ‘Gateway drug’ Stanford University School of Medicine professor Anna Lembke, the first witness called by the plaintiffs, testified that she views social media, broadly speaking, as a drug. The part of the brain that acts as a brake when it comes to having another hit is not typically developed before a person is 25 years old, Lembke, the author of the book "Dopamine Nation," told jurors. "Which is why teenagers will often take risks that they shouldn't and not appreciate future consequences," Lembke testified. "And typically, the gateway drug is the most easily accessible drug," she said, describing Kaley's first use of YouTube at the age of six. The case is being treated as a bellwether proceeding whose outcome could set the tone for a wave of similar litigation across the United States. Social media firms face hundreds of lawsuits accusing them of leading young users to become addicted to content and suffer from depression, eating disorders, psychiatric hospitalisation, and even suicide. Lawyers for the plaintiffs are borrowing strategies used in the 1990s and 2000s against the tobacco industry, which faced a similar onslaught of lawsuits arguing that companies knowingly sold a harmful product. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The civil trial in California state court centres on allegations that a 20-year-old woman, identified as Kaley G.M., suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child.

Instagram chief to testify as YouTube, Meta face landmark social media addiction trial

The Southern Indian State of Tamil Nadu is playing a crucial role in India's electronics manufacturing and electronics export, highlighted the state's Industries Minister TRB Rajaa. He projected that Tamil Nadu's electronics exports in 2025-26 would even surpass the $18bn mark, which is expected to be well over 40% of India's projected $45bn electronics exports for the same period. Rajaa was addressing 'Source India- Electronics Supply Chain,' a Business-to-Business platform of the Electronic Industries Association of India (ELCINA). Mentioning that India's electronics manufacturing industry aims to hit $500 billion output by 2030, Rajaa said that Tamil Nadu's share would likely be at $150 billion then. To further boost the state's potential, Rajaa urged industry to go beyond manufacturing and services, to invest in R&amp;D, while also involving academia to identify the possibilities and areas that need attention. He said that the Tamil Nadu government's providing additional incentive packages beyond the Central government's packages has helped it bag five of seven projects under the first phase of the electronics component manufacturing scheme and 69% of all jobs in the second phase. He also expressed concern over the Central Government not releasing the latest state-wise data on electronics exports for the ongoing financial year. Electronics is no longer just an industry, it is the infrastructure for modern civilisation- from mobility and healthcare to defence, energy, AI and space-it sits at the core of every national priority, said Dr Sasikumar Gendham, President, ELCINA. "To power India’s rise as the world’s electronics engine, we must move from assembly to value creation, from cost advantage to capability advantage, and from fragmentation to strong ecosystem thinking—integrating MSMEs, academia and supplier development," he added. As part of the inaugural session, ELCINA released its latest report titled “Tamil Nadu’s Electronics Industry – Status and Growth of the Industry,” highlighting the state’s manufacturing performance, export growth and opportunities for deeper localisation. The report highlighted that Tamil Nadu had 191 units connected to electronics manufacturing, and it is also the state with the largest number of mobile phone manufacturing units and those making related components. Speaking at the event, Atul Lall, Vice Chairman &amp; Managing Director, Dixon Technologies India Ltd. &amp; Past President ELCINA, said, “India’s electronics manufacturing sector is entering a phase of accelerated growth, driven by scale, policy support and increasing global confidence. The next phase of competitiveness will depend on deeper localisation, strong component ecosystems and continued investment in technology and skills. Platforms like Source India play a vital role in strengthening industry collaboration and positioning India as a trusted and resilient partner in global supply chains.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-run-for-more-than-20-years-without-refueling-how-long-does-it-really-take-to-refuel-the-uss-abraham-lincoln-1770642696577">How can the USS Abraham Lincoln go more than 20 years without refueling?</a>

TRB Rajaa said that the state government's providing additional incentive packages beyond the Central government's packages has helped it bag five of seven projects under the first phase of the electronics component manufacturing scheme and 69% of all jobs in the 2nd phase.

The Southern Indian State of Tamil Nadu is playing a crucial role in India's electronics manufacturing and electronics export, highlighted the state's Industries Minister TRB Rajaa. He projected that Tamil Nadu's electronics exports in 2025-26 would even surpass the $18bn mark, which is expected to be well over 40% of India's projected $45bn electronics exports for the same period. Rajaa was addressing 'Source India- Electronics Supply Chain,' a Business-to-Business platform of the Electronic Industries Association of India (ELCINA). Mentioning that India's electronics manufacturing industry aims to hit $500 billion output by 2030, Rajaa said that Tamil Nadu's share would likely be at $150 billion then. To further boost the state's potential, Rajaa urged industry to go beyond manufacturing and services, to invest in R&D, while also involving academia to identify the possibilities and areas that need attention. He said that the Tamil Nadu government's providing additional incentive packages beyond the Central government's packages has helped it bag five of seven projects under the first phase of the electronics component manufacturing scheme and 69% of all jobs in the second phase. He also expressed concern over the Central Government not releasing the latest state-wise data on electronics exports for the ongoing financial year. Electronics is no longer just an industry, it is the infrastructure for modern civilisation- from mobility and healthcare to defence, energy, AI and space-it sits at the core of every national priority, said Dr Sasikumar Gendham, President, ELCINA. "To power India’s rise as the world’s electronics engine, we must move from assembly to value creation, from cost advantage to capability advantage, and from fragmentation to strong ecosystem thinking—integrating MSMEs, academia and supplier development," he added. As part of the inaugural session, ELCINA released its latest report titled “Tamil Nadu’s Electronics Industry – Status and Growth of the Industry,” highlighting the state’s manufacturing performance, export growth and opportunities for deeper localisation. The report highlighted that Tamil Nadu had 191 units connected to electronics manufacturing, and it is also the state with the largest number of mobile phone manufacturing units and those making related components. Speaking at the event, Atul Lall, Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Dixon Technologies India Ltd. & Past President ELCINA, said, “India’s electronics manufacturing sector is entering a phase of accelerated growth, driven by scale, policy support and increasing global confidence. The next phase of competitiveness will depend on deeper localisation, strong component ecosystems and continued investment in technology and skills. Platforms like Source India play a vital role in strengthening industry collaboration and positioning India as a trusted and resilient partner in global supply chains.” Also read: How can the USS Abraham Lincoln go more than 20 years without refueling?

TRB Rajaa said that the state government's providing additional incentive packages beyond the Central government's packages has helped it bag five of seven projects under the first phase of the electronics component manufacturing scheme and 69% of all jobs in the 2nd phase.

India's electronics exports could hit $45bn; Tamil Nadu's share over $18bn

The government of India has introduced a significant update to digital regulations, requiring social media platforms to mark AI-generated content clearly. This new law mandates that all AI-altered content, whether it’s images, videos, or audio, must be tagged with visible labels or embedded metadata that indicate its artificial origin. The objective is to help users easily distinguish between authentic and AI-modified content.&nbsp;The draft amendments to the Information Technology Rules, 2021, were proposed by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). They go beyond simple labeling to ensure that platforms employ automated tools capable of detecting and blocking illegal, misleading, or sexually exploitative AI content before it can go viral. In addition, if flagged as inappropriate, objectionable content must be removed within three hours.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/discord-to-verify-age-of-all-users-from-march-what-changes-for-teens-and-adults-1770713286676">Discord to verify age of all users from March: What changes for teens and adults</a><h2>What does the new rule include?</h2><ul><li>A clear AI label or embedded metadata on any AI-generated content, which cannot be removed or hidden.</li><li>For visuals, the label must cover at least 10% of the image; for audio and video, it should appear within the first 10% of the clip.</li><li>Social media platforms are required to prompt users to confirm whether the content they are uploading is AI-generated, and verify these claims using their own tools.</li><li>Automated systems must screen for illegal or misleading AI content and prevent its dissemination.</li><li>Users will receive quarterly reminders about penalties for violating these rules.</li></ul>The mandate follows several high-profile deepfake incidents, which have been used to manipulate public opinion and damage reputations, particularly ahead of the upcoming elections in Bihar. In response, the Election Commission has asked political parties to label any AI-generated campaign materials. This move highlights the growing concern about the impact of AI-generated content on the democratic process and the need for greater transparency in digital space.

India govt introduces new rules to label AI content on social media platforms

The government of India has introduced a significant update to digital regulations, requiring social media platforms to mark AI-generated content clearly. This new law mandates that all AI-altered content, whether it’s images, videos, or audio, must be tagged with visible labels or embedded metadata that indicate its artificial origin. The objective is to help users easily distinguish between authentic and AI-modified content. The draft amendments to the Information Technology Rules, 2021, were proposed by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). They go beyond simple labeling to ensure that platforms employ automated tools capable of detecting and blocking illegal, misleading, or sexually exploitative AI content before it can go viral. In addition, if flagged as inappropriate, objectionable content must be removed within three hours. Also Read: Discord to verify age of all users from March: What changes for teens and adults What does the new rule include? A clear AI label or embedded metadata on any AI-generated content, which cannot be removed or hidden. For visuals, the label must cover at least 10% of the image; for audio and video, it should appear within the first 10% of the clip. Social media platforms are required to prompt users to confirm whether the content they are uploading is AI-generated, and verify these claims using their own tools. Automated systems must screen for illegal or misleading AI content and prevent its dissemination. Users will receive quarterly reminders about penalties for violating these rules. The mandate follows several high-profile deepfake incidents, which have been used to manipulate public opinion and damage reputations, particularly ahead of the upcoming elections in Bihar. In response, the Election Commission has asked political parties to label any AI-generated campaign materials. This move highlights the growing concern about the impact of AI-generated content on the democratic process and the need for greater transparency in digital space.

India's government mandates social media platforms to clearly label AI-generated content, remove flagged posts within three hours, and use tools to detect illegal content

India govt introduces new rules to label AI content on social media platforms. What are they?

Discord has announced a major safety update that will change how people use the platform. Starting early March, all users worldwide will be required to verify their age to get full access to Discord.Until age verification is completed, every account will be treated as a teen account by default. This means stricter content controls, limited communication features, and blocked access to adult or age-restricted spaces even for adult users.<h2>What is changing for Discord users</h2>According to the company, the move is aimed at ensuring that adult content is only visible to adults, while younger users are shown material suitable for their age group.Teen-level access comes with tighter safety rules. These include restricted messaging options, limits on joining certain servers, and automatic blocking of adult content. Users will regain full access only after their age is verified.Discord said most users will need to complete the process just once. After that, their account will automatically reflect the correct age group.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Discord will soon be expanding teen safety protections worldwide including teen-by-default settings and age assurance designed to create safer experiences for teens. We’re also launching recruitment for Discord&#39;s first Teen Council, creating a space for teen voices to help shape… <a href="https://t.co/CW7G4sO38R">pic.twitter.com/CW7G4sO38R</a>&mdash; Discord Support (@discord_support) <a href="https://twitter.com/discord_support/status/2020863471550927243?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>How Discord’s age verification will work</h2>To verify age, users will be given a choice of methods. These include facial age estimation using a device camera, submitting a government-issued ID, or in some cases using both methods if additional confirmation is required.The platform has also introduced a background age inference system. This system helps flag accounts that may need further checks before they are confirmed as adult or teen accounts.Discord said more verification options will be added over time to make the process smoother for users across different regions.<h2>Privacy concerns and data safety</h2>The company has addressed privacy worries linked to age checks. Discord said facial scan videos remain on the user’s device and are not uploaded to its servers. ID documents, if submitted, are deleted quickly after age confirmation.Discord also confirmed that age verification details will remain private. Other users on the platform will not be able to see someone’s age status.The update comes as governments in several countries push social platforms to strengthen child safety rules online. According to reports cited by 9to5Mac, age checks have become a key focus for regulators reviewing social media and messaging apps.<h2>Why Discord is making this move now</h2>Discord said the goal is to create a safer environment for teens while allowing adults to continue using the platform without unnecessary restrictions once verified.By making age verification mandatory, the company hopes to reduce accidental exposure to adult content and improve trust among parents, users and regulators.The rollout is expected to begin globally in early March, with all users required to comply to unlock full access.

Discord will require mandatory age verification from early March. Until verified, all accounts default to teen mode, with stricter controls and blocked adult content. Users must verify via facial scan or ID to unlock full access.


Discord has announced a major safety update that will change how people use the platform. Starting early March, all users worldwide will be required to verify their age to get full access to Discord. Until age verification is completed, every account will be treated as a teen account by default. This means stricter content controls, limited communication features, and blocked access to adult or age-restricted spaces even for adult users. What is changing for Discord users According to the company, the move is aimed at ensuring that adult content is only visible to adults, while younger users are shown material suitable for their age group. Teen-level access comes with tighter safety rules. These include restricted messaging options, limits on joining certain servers, and automatic blocking of adult content. Users will regain full access only after their age is verified. Discord said most users will need to complete the process just once. After that, their account will automatically reflect the correct age group.

Discord will require mandatory age verification from early March. Until verified, all accounts default to teen mode, with stricter controls and blocked adult content. Users must verify via facial scan or ID to unlock full access.

Discord to verify age of all users from March: What changes for teens and adults

Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, along with Google-owned YouTube, on Monday (Feb 9) were accused of "engineering addiction" in children. The accusation against the tech giants was levelled as a closely watched trial against major social media companies began in California. The trial would see Meta and YouTube facing accusations that their platforms were deliberately designed to be addictive for children. It marks one of the first times a jury will directly consider whether social media companies can be held legally responsible for the mental health impact of their platforms on children.<h2>"Engineered addiction"</h2>The case, unfolding before a Los Angeles jury, could set an important legal precedent for hundreds of similar lawsuits across the United States. At the centre of the trial is a 20-year-old woman identified in court documents as Kaley G.M., who claims she suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jimmy-lai-s-son-sebastien-lai-asks-trump-to-tell-xi-the-prison-sentence-is-a-mistake-warns-if-he-dies-1770685339030">Jimmy Lai’s son asks Trump to tell Xi the prison sentence is a ‘mistake’</a>In opening arguments, plaintiffs’ attorney Mark Lanier accused tech companies of intentionally engineering their platforms to hook young users. "This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," Lanier told the jury. Stacking children's toy bricks, he described the case "as easy as A-B-C," A for addicting, B for brains, and C for children.Lanier argued that companies built systems designed to maximise engagement, comparing social media features to gambling mechanisms. "They don't only build apps; they build traps," he said, adding that Meta and YouTube pursued "addiction by design".He told jurors that Kaley began using YouTube at the age of six, and her family was never warned that "the goal was viewer addiction," or about the risks of algorithm-driven addiction among children.The case is being treated as a “bellwether” trial, meaning its outcome could influence how future lawsuits against social media companies are handled, including potential compensation for plaintiffs.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-health-secretary-robert-f-kennedy-jr-s-bizarre-link-with-paedophile-revealed-in-latest-epstein-file-dump-dinosaur-hunt-emails-1770444507541">Trump health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s bizarre link with paedophile revealed in latest Epstein file dump</a><h2>Companies reject responsibility</h2>Lawyers for Meta strongly pushed back against the claims, arguing that social media was not the primary cause of the young woman’s struggles. "If you took Instagram away and everything else was the same in Kaley's life, would her life be completely different, or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?" Defense attorney Paul Schmidt asked jurors. He said that personal challenges, including bullying and family issues, played a larger role in her mental health difficulties.YouTube also denied the allegations. A company spokesperson said the claims were "simply not true,” pointing to ongoing efforts to introduce safety tools for younger users.

A landmark trial in California has begun against Meta and YouTube, with plaintiffs accusing the companies of deliberately designing their platforms to ‘addict’ children and harm their mental health. All you need to know.

Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, along with Google-owned YouTube, on Monday (Feb 9) were accused of "engineering addiction" in children. The accusation against the tech giants was levelled as a closely watched trial against major social media companies began in California. The trial would see Meta and YouTube facing accusations that their platforms were deliberately designed to be addictive for children. It marks one of the first times a jury will directly consider whether social media companies can be held legally responsible for the mental health impact of their platforms on children. "Engineered addiction" The case, unfolding before a Los Angeles jury, could set an important legal precedent for hundreds of similar lawsuits across the United States. At the centre of the trial is a 20-year-old woman identified in court documents as Kaley G.M., who claims she suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child. Also read | Jimmy Lai’s son asks Trump to tell Xi the prison sentence is a ‘mistake’ In opening arguments, plaintiffs’ attorney Mark Lanier accused tech companies of intentionally engineering their platforms to hook young users. "This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," Lanier told the jury. Stacking children's toy bricks, he described the case "as easy as A-B-C," A for addicting, B for brains, and C for children. Lanier argued that companies built systems designed to maximise engagement, comparing social media features to gambling mechanisms. "They don't only build apps; they build traps," he said, adding that Meta and YouTube pursued "addiction by design". He told jurors that Kaley began using YouTube at the age of six, and her family was never warned that "the goal was viewer addiction," or about the risks of algorithm-driven addiction among children. The case is being treated as a “bellwether” trial, meaning its outcome could influence how future lawsuits against social media companies are handled, including potential compensation for plaintiffs. Also read | Trump health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s bizarre link with paedophile revealed in latest Epstein file dump Companies reject responsibility Lawyers for Meta strongly pushed back against the claims, arguing that social media was not the primary cause of the young woman’s struggles. "If you took Instagram away and everything else was the same in Kaley's life, would her life be completely different, or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?" Defense attorney Paul Schmidt asked jurors. He said that personal challenges, including bullying and family issues, played a larger role in her mental health difficulties. YouTube also denied the allegations. A company spokesperson said the claims were "simply not true,” pointing to ongoing efforts to introduce safety tools for younger users.

A landmark trial in California has begun against Meta and YouTube, with plaintiffs accusing the companies of deliberately designing their platforms to ‘addict’ children and harm their mental health. All you need to know.

‘Addiction by design’? Meta, YouTube accused of 'engineering addiction' in children during US trial

The European Union on Monday (Feb 09) asked Meta to provide rival chatbots access to WhatsApp after an antitrust found Mark Zukurburg's tech firm in breach of the bloc's competition rules. According to the European Commission, a change in Meta's terms had "effectively" blocked third-party artificial intelligence assistance from connecting to customers using its messaging platform since January. "Considering quickly imposing interim measures on Meta, to preserve access for competitors to WhatsApp while the investigation is ongoing, and avoid Meta's new policy irreparably harming competition in Europe," bloc's competition chief Teresa Ribera said. The 27-nation bloc also sent a formal warning to Meta through "a statement of objections" as part of an ongoing antitrust investigation. The US tech giant rejected the commission's finding, saying "The facts are that there is no reason for the EU to intervene," a Meta spokesperson said. "There are many AI options, and people can use them from app stores, operating systems, devices, websites, and industry partnerships. The commission's logic incorrectly assumes the WhatsApp Business API is a key distribution channel for these chatbots," the spokesperson said. The European Union is actively implanting measure to put checks on the power of Big Tech, many of whom are based in the United States, despite strong pushback from Donald Trump and his officials in Washington.&nbsp;"We cannot allow dominant tech companies to illegally leverage their dominance to give themselves an unfair advantage," Ribera said in a statement.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-is-shivam-mishra-tobacoo-baron-s-car-crazed-son-who-rammed-his-lamborghini-into-pedestrians-in-kanpur-1770625580796">Who is Shivam Mishra, Tobacco baron's car-crazed son who rammed his Lamborghini into pedestrians in Kanpur</a>&nbsp;The action against Meta comes after the EU launched a formal investigation into Elon Musk’s social media platform X on January 26. The probe follows widespread controversy over the generation of non-consensual sexualized deepfake images, including those of minors, by the platform’s AI chatbot, Grok. Under the Digital Services Act (DSA).&nbsp;Earlier, the European Union imposed a $140 million fine on X for breaching the bloc's transparency rules under the Digital Service Act (DSA). The regulators sEuropean regulators found X guilty of three violations after a two-year probe.

The 27-nation bloc also sent a formal warning to Meta through "a statement of objections" as part of an ongoing antitrust investigation.

The European Union on Monday (Feb 09) asked Meta to provide rival chatbots access to WhatsApp after an antitrust found Mark Zukurburg's tech firm in breach of the bloc's competition rules. According to the European Commission, a change in Meta's terms had "effectively" blocked third-party artificial intelligence assistance from connecting to customers using its messaging platform since January. "Considering quickly imposing interim measures on Meta, to preserve access for competitors to WhatsApp while the investigation is ongoing, and avoid Meta's new policy irreparably harming competition in Europe," bloc's competition chief Teresa Ribera said. The 27-nation bloc also sent a formal warning to Meta through "a statement of objections" as part of an ongoing antitrust investigation. The US tech giant rejected the commission's finding, saying "The facts are that there is no reason for the EU to intervene," a Meta spokesperson said. "There are many AI options, and people can use them from app stores, operating systems, devices, websites, and industry partnerships. The commission's logic incorrectly assumes the WhatsApp Business API is a key distribution channel for these chatbots," the spokesperson said. The European Union is actively implanting measure to put checks on the power of Big Tech, many of whom are based in the United States, despite strong pushback from Donald Trump and his officials in Washington. "We cannot allow dominant tech companies to illegally leverage their dominance to give themselves an unfair advantage," Ribera said in a statement. Also Read: Who is Shivam Mishra, Tobacco baron's car-crazed son who rammed his Lamborghini into pedestrians in Kanpur The action against Meta comes after the EU launched a formal investigation into Elon Musk’s social media platform X on January 26. The probe follows widespread controversy over the generation of non-consensual sexualized deepfake images, including those of minors, by the platform’s AI chatbot, Grok. Under the Digital Services Act (DSA). Earlier, the European Union imposed a $140 million fine on X for breaching the bloc's transparency rules under the Digital Service Act (DSA). The regulators sEuropean regulators found X guilty of three violations after a two-year probe.

The 27-nation bloc also sent a formal warning to Meta through "a statement of objections" as part of an ongoing antitrust investigation.

After action on Musk’s X, EU warns Meta to open WhatsApp to rival AI chatbots

Starting a business no longer means hiring a team on day one. With AI tools becoming smarter and more reliable, many founders are now choosing to work alone with artificial intelligence acting as their co-worker.This shift is being driven by the growing use of Claude, an AI assistant developed by Anthropic, which is increasingly being used for what founders are calling “AI coworking”.The idea is simple: instead of working with colleagues, Nowadays solo founders rely on AI tools to help with coding, writing, research, planning and even customer support.&nbsp;<h2>What is AI coworking?</h2>AI coworking refers to using AI tools like Claude as a day-to-day work partner. These tools can write code, draft business plans, analyse data, respond to emails and even help with marketing ideas.According to startup founders and investors, this allows one person to do the work that earlier required a small team. Tasks that once needed developers, designers and analysts can now be handled by a single founder using AI.As AI models improve, the cost of starting a business is also falling. There is less need for office space, early hiring or large funding rounds just to get started.&nbsp;<h2>Solopreneurship&nbsp;</h2>For many first-time founders, starting alone now feels practical rather than risky. AI tools are available at a fraction of the cost of hiring employees, and they work round the clock.Industry observers say this trend is especially strong among software startups, online services and digital creators. A single founder can build a product, test it with users and even generate revenue before hiring anyone.This model also gives founders more control. Decisions are faster, costs are lower and there is less pressure to scale before the product is ready.<h2>What this means for jobs and early-stage teams</h2>The rise of AI coworking does not mean teams will disappear completely. Instead, experts say teams may form later, once a business is already stable.Early roles such as junior developers, assistants and coordinators are likely to be the most affected. Many of these tasks are now handled by AI tools in the early stages.At the same time, demand is growing for people who can guide, review and manage AI-generated work, especially as businesses scale.<h2>A shift in how businesses are built</h2>AI coworking is changing not just who builds companies, but how they are built. Founders are testing ideas faster, launching sooner and learning from real users instead of long planning cycles.While challenges remain including over-reliance on AI and the need for human judgement many founders believe this model is here to stay.As AI tools like Claude become more capable, solopreneurship is no longer an exception. For many new founders, it is quickly becoming the starting point.

AI tools like Anthropic’s Claude are enabling founders to start businesses alone, with AI acting as a full-time co-worker. From coding to marketing, AI coworking is lowering costs and making solopreneurship the default startup model.

Starting a business no longer means hiring a team on day one. With AI tools becoming smarter and more reliable, many founders are now choosing to work alone with artificial intelligence acting as their co-worker. This shift is being driven by the growing use of Claude, an AI assistant developed by Anthropic, which is increasingly being used for what founders are calling “AI coworking”. The idea is simple: instead of working with colleagues, Nowadays solo founders rely on AI tools to help with coding, writing, research, planning and even customer support. What is AI coworking? AI coworking refers to using AI tools like Claude as a day-to-day work partner. These tools can write code, draft business plans, analyse data, respond to emails and even help with marketing ideas. According to startup founders and investors, this allows one person to do the work that earlier required a small team. Tasks that once needed developers, designers and analysts can now be handled by a single founder using AI. As AI models improve, the cost of starting a business is also falling. There is less need for office space, early hiring or large funding rounds just to get started. Solopreneurship For many first-time founders, starting alone now feels practical rather than risky. AI tools are available at a fraction of the cost of hiring employees, and they work round the clock. Industry observers say this trend is especially strong among software startups, online services and digital creators. A single founder can build a product, test it with users and even generate revenue before hiring anyone. This model also gives founders more control. Decisions are faster, costs are lower and there is less pressure to scale before the product is ready. What this means for jobs and early-stage teams The rise of AI coworking does not mean teams will disappear completely. Instead, experts say teams may form later, once a business is already stable. Early roles such as junior developers, assistants and coordinators are likely to be the most affected. Many of these tasks are now handled by AI tools in the early stages. At the same time, demand is growing for people who can guide, review and manage AI-generated work, especially as businesses scale. A shift in how businesses are built AI coworking is changing not just who builds companies, but how they are built. Founders are testing ideas faster, launching sooner and learning from real users instead of long planning cycles. While challenges remain including over-reliance on AI and the need for human judgement many founders believe this model is here to stay. As AI tools like Claude become more capable, solopreneurship is no longer an exception. For many new founders, it is quickly becoming the starting point.

AI tools like Anthropic’s Claude are enabling founders to start businesses alone, with AI acting as a full-time co-worker. From coding to marketing, AI coworking is lowering costs and making solopreneurship the default startup model.

Is solopreneurship becoming the default? How Claude AI ‘coworking’ is changing the way of starting a business

OpenAI has launched Frontier, a new enterprise platform designed to help organisations build and manage artificial intelligence agents that can work across teams and systems.According to OpenAI, Frontier is aimed at companies that want to move beyond using AI as a simple chatbot or productivity tool, and instead use it as a shared digital co-worker across the organisation.The platform is currently being rolled out to a limited number of organisations, with a wider release expected later.&nbsp;<h2>What is OpenAI’s Frontier?</h2>It is an enterprise workspace where multiple AI agents can be created, trained and deployed together. These agents can operate in the same context as human employees, using company data, tools and rules.OpenAI says Frontier is designed for “real work”, not one-off prompts. Instead of asking an AI tool a single question, companies can set up agents that handle tasks across departments, systems and workflows.According to OpenAI, early users include large organisations such as Thermo Fisher Scientific, Intuit and Oracle.<h2>How does Frontier work inside a company?</h2>Frontier is built in a way that mirrors how human employees are onboarded. AI agents are given clear instructions, access limits and training before they start working.The platform allows organisations to connect:&nbsp;Internal data such as CRMs and data warehouses&nbsp;Identity rules, permissions and restrictions&nbsp;Clear definitions of what good and poor work looks like&nbsp;Access to internal and third-party applications as tools&nbsp;This setup allows AI agents to work across systems, receive feedback and improve over time. OpenAI says this reduces errors and helps agents complete tasks faster.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Introducing OpenAI Frontier—a new platform that helps enterprises build, deploy, and manage AI coworkers that can do real work. <a href="https://t.co/4W0adQzSZ1">https://t.co/4W0adQzSZ1</a>&mdash; OpenAI (@OpenAI) <a href="https://twitter.com/OpenAI/status/2019413712772411528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Why Frontier matters for everyday work</h2>Until now, most AI tools have helped individuals work faster at a task level. Frontier shifts AI into a shared role across teams.This means AI agents can support workflows across departments, reduce delays between teams and keep work moving even when people are unavailable. For example, if a team member is on leave, an AI agent can still provide access to information or updates.Experts say this could change how organisations think about productivity, handovers and even work-life balance.&nbsp;<h2>Which jobs and teams will be affected most?</h2>Frontier is not limited to engineers or IT teams. OpenAI says non-technical teams can also use the platform.Roles likely to be affected include project management, customer operations, procurement, marketing, sales and other office functions. Some roles may benefit from support and automation, while others, especially junior or assistant roles, may see tasks reduced or changed.<h2>What leaders and managers should watch out for</h2>Some experts have warned that while Frontier makes AI adoption easier, companies should not rely on it blindly.Jason Schloetzer, an associate professor at Georgetown University, said organisations should still build internal skills and oversight. He warned that companies risk becoming too dependent on a single platform if they do not develop their own understanding of AI systems.He suggested that leaders should train managers to supervise AI agents, set clear rules, and keep humans involved in quality checks and important decisions.<h2>What comes next for Frontier and enterprise AI</h2>Frontier reflects a broader shift in how AI is used at work. Instead of being a standalone tool, AI is becoming part of core organisational infrastructure.OpenAI’s platform is unlikely to be the last of its kind. Other big technology companies are expected to launch similar systems as competition in enterprise AI grows.For businesses, experts say the key will be to balance automation with human judgement, and to prepare teams for working alongside AI agents rather than being replaced by them.

OpenAI has launched Frontier, an enterprise platform that lets organisations deploy AI agents as shared digital co-workers. Frontier allows AI to work across teams, systems and data, shifting AI from chatbots to core workplace infrastructure.

OpenAI has launched Frontier, a new enterprise platform designed to help organisations build and manage artificial intelligence agents that can work across teams and systems. According to OpenAI, Frontier is aimed at companies that want to move beyond using AI as a simple chatbot or productivity tool, and instead use it as a shared digital co-worker across the organisation. The platform is currently being rolled out to a limited number of organisations, with a wider release expected later. What is OpenAI’s Frontier? It is an enterprise workspace where multiple AI agents can be created, trained and deployed together. These agents can operate in the same context as human employees, using company data, tools and rules. OpenAI says Frontier is designed for “real work”, not one-off prompts. Instead of asking an AI tool a single question, companies can set up agents that handle tasks across departments, systems and workflows. According to OpenAI, early users include large organisations such as Thermo Fisher Scientific, Intuit and Oracle. How does Frontier work inside a company? Frontier is built in a way that mirrors how human employees are onboarded. AI agents are given clear instructions, access limits and training before they start working. The platform allows organisations to connect: Internal data such as CRMs and data warehouses Identity rules, permissions and restrictions Clear definitions of what good and poor work looks like Access to internal and third-party applications as tools This setup allows AI agents to work across systems, receive feedback and improve over time. OpenAI says this reduces errors and helps agents complete tasks faster.

OpenAI has launched Frontier, an enterprise platform that lets organisations deploy AI agents as shared digital co-workers. Frontier allows AI to work across teams, systems and data, shifting AI from chatbots to core workplace infrastructure.

What is OpenAI’s Frontier and how it works: All you need to know

AI may live in the digital world, but a new platform wants to give it real-world hands and feet. The idea is simple: AI agents hire human ‘meat’ to perform physical tasks they cannot do themselves, creating a strange new gig economy where software becomes the boss. All you need to know.

'Robots need your body': Are you up to 'rent' yourself to Artificial Intelligence? Deets inside

NASA is using artificial intelligence to speed up the search for planets beyond our solar system. The latest tool, called ExoMiner++, helps scientists study huge amounts of space data and identify possible new exoplanets more quickly and accurately.Developed by researchers at NASA’s Ames Research Center, ExoMiner++ builds on earlier AI work and uses data from two major space missions Kepler and TESS.<h2>What is ExoMiner++</h2>ExoMiner++ is an AI-based software tool designed to analyse transit photometry data. This data comes from tiny dips in a star’s brightness when a planet passes in front of it, known as a transit.According to NASA, the goal of the ExoMiner project is to automatically sort through hundreds of thousands of such signals and flag the ones that are most likely caused by planets. Many signals turn out to be noise or other space events, such as eclipsing binary stars.The original ExoMiner, created in 2021, helped confirm 370 new exoplanets using Kepler data. The new version, ExoMiner++, has been trained using both Kepler and TESS data, making it more flexible and powerful.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Meet our new AI-enabled planet hunting tool: ExoMiner++ Available here: <a href="https://t.co/dDS9j1wbh8">https://t.co/dDS9j1wbh8</a> It&#39;s NASA&#39;s open-source software that uses artificial intelligence to help find exoplanets in publicly available data from the Kepler and TESS missions. Learn more:… <a href="https://t.co/e0iIr1BMB2">pic.twitter.com/e0iIr1BMB2</a>&mdash; NASA Ames (@NASAAmes) <a href="https://twitter.com/NASAAmes/status/2019460935400718651?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>How ExoMiner++ uses AI to find planets</h2>ExoMiner++ uses machine learning to classify transit signals and decide whether they are likely to be planets. In an early test run using TESS data, the tool flagged around 7,000 targets as potential exoplanet candidates.NASA scientists explain that an exoplanet candidate is not a confirmed planet. These signals still need follow-up observations from other telescopes. However, AI helps narrow down the list, saving scientists years of manual work.Miguel Martinho, a co-investigator on the project at NASA Ames, said AI is ideal for this task because of the sheer volume of data involved. According to him, when there are hundreds of thousands of signals, deep learning tools become essential.<h2>Data from Kepler and TESS&nbsp;</h2>Kepler and TESS observe space in different ways. Kepler studied a small area of the sky in great detail, while TESS scans almost the entire sky, focusing on nearby stars.Despite these differences, NASA says the data from both missions is compatible. This allows ExoMiner++ to learn from both datasets and deliver more reliable results. Project lead Hamed Valizadegan noted that combining data from the two missions allows strong scientific returns with limited resources.<h2>What comes next</h2>ExoMiner++ is open-source and available on GitHub. This means researchers around the world can download it, test it, and use it on public space data.Kevin Murphy, NASA’s chief science data officer, said open-source tools help scientists reproduce results and explore data more deeply. He added that open data and shared code are key parts of modern scientific research.NASA researchers are already working on the next version of ExoMiner++. In the future, the tool may not just analyse transit signals but also detect them directly from raw telescope data.Jon Jenkins, an exoplanet scientist at NASA Ames, said NASA’s open science approach is improving both research and software. According to him, open-source science is one of the main reasons the field of exoplanet discovery is moving so fast.As more space data becomes available, tools like ExoMiner++ are expected to play a central role in finding new worlds beyond Earth.

NASA has developed ExoMiner++, an AI tool that speeds up the search for exoplanets by analysing massive datasets from Kepler and TESS. The system helps scientists quickly identify promising planets.

NASA is using artificial intelligence to speed up the search for planets beyond our solar system. The latest tool, called ExoMiner++, helps scientists study huge amounts of space data and identify possible new exoplanets more quickly and accurately. Developed by researchers at NASA’s Ames Research Center, ExoMiner++ builds on earlier AI work and uses data from two major space missions Kepler and TESS. What is ExoMiner++ ExoMiner++ is an AI-based software tool designed to analyse transit photometry data. This data comes from tiny dips in a star’s brightness when a planet passes in front of it, known as a transit. According to NASA, the goal of the ExoMiner project is to automatically sort through hundreds of thousands of such signals and flag the ones that are most likely caused by planets. Many signals turn out to be noise or other space events, such as eclipsing binary stars. The original ExoMiner, created in 2021, helped confirm 370 new exoplanets using Kepler data. The new version, ExoMiner++, has been trained using both Kepler and TESS data, making it more flexible and powerful.

NASA has developed ExoMiner++, an AI tool that speeds up the search for exoplanets by analysing massive datasets from Kepler and TESS. The system helps scientists quickly identify promising planets.

What is NASA’s ExoMiner++? How AI is scanning space data and helping to find new planets

Amazon Web Services ended 2025 with its fastest quarterly growth in more than three years, showing how strong demand for cloud services and artificial intelligence is reshaping enterprise spending.According to Amazon’s latest earnings report, AWS recorded $35.6 billion in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2025, a 24 per cent year-on-year rise. This was the cloud unit’s strongest growth in 13 quarters. Amazon said AWS now has an annual revenue run rate of $142 billion.Operating income also increased. AWS posted $12.5 billion in operating profit, up from $10.6 billion in the same quarter a year earlier, according to company filings.<h2>AI demand&nbsp;</h2>Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said the scale of AWS growth matters as much as the percentage increase.&nbsp;Speaking during the earnings call, Jassy said that delivering 24 per cent growth on a $142 billion annual run rate highlights how much new business AWS is adding compared to rivals.&nbsp;The fourth-quarter jump was supported by new enterprise and government contracts, including agreements with Salesforce, BlackRock, Perplexity and the U.S. Air Force, according to the company.&nbsp;Jassy also said that AWS remains the main cloud provider for many fast-growing companies. More than half of the top 500 US startups use AWS as their primary cloud platform, he added.&nbsp;<h2>AI workloads are expanding core cloud usage</h2>AI has become a major driver of cloud spending, and AWS is benefiting from this shift. According to Amazon, customers prefer to run AI systems where their existing data and applications already sit.&nbsp;Jassy said companies deploying large AI models on AWS often expand their broader cloud usage at the same time. This includes storage, computing power and networking services that support AI operations.&nbsp;AWS also expanded its physical infrastructure. During the fourth quarter, the company added more than one gigawatt of power capacity across its data centre network, highlighting continued investment in long-term cloud demand.&nbsp;<h2>AWS growth strong</h2>AWS accounted for 16.6 per cent of Amazon’s total revenue, which stood at $213.4 billion in the fourth quarter, according to the earnings report.Despite strong cloud performance, investor sentiment was mixed. Amazon shares fell nearly 10 per cent in after-hours trading, as markets reacted to higher capital spending plans and earnings that missed analyst expectations.Still, analysts note that AWS remains central to Amazon’s future, especially as companies continue to move from on-premise systems to cloud platforms and increase spending on AI-driven tools.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Amazon Web Services posted its fastest growth in over three years, with Q4 2025 revenue up 24 per cent to $35.6 billion. Strong enterprise cloud deals and rising AI workloads pushed AWS to a $142 billion annual run rate, reinforcing its lead in AI-driven cloud demand.

Amazon Web Services ended 2025 with its fastest quarterly growth in more than three years, showing how strong demand for cloud services and artificial intelligence is reshaping enterprise spending. According to Amazon’s latest earnings report, AWS recorded $35.6 billion in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2025, a 24 per cent year-on-year rise. This was the cloud unit’s strongest growth in 13 quarters. Amazon said AWS now has an annual revenue run rate of $142 billion. Operating income also increased. AWS posted $12.5 billion in operating profit, up from $10.6 billion in the same quarter a year earlier, according to company filings. AI demand Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said the scale of AWS growth matters as much as the percentage increase. Speaking during the earnings call, Jassy said that delivering 24 per cent growth on a $142 billion annual run rate highlights how much new business AWS is adding compared to rivals. The fourth-quarter jump was supported by new enterprise and government contracts, including agreements with Salesforce, BlackRock, Perplexity and the U.S. Air Force, according to the company. Jassy also said that AWS remains the main cloud provider for many fast-growing companies. More than half of the top 500 US startups use AWS as their primary cloud platform, he added. AI workloads are expanding core cloud usage AI has become a major driver of cloud spending, and AWS is benefiting from this shift. According to Amazon, customers prefer to run AI systems where their existing data and applications already sit. Jassy said companies deploying large AI models on AWS often expand their broader cloud usage at the same time. This includes storage, computing power and networking services that support AI operations. AWS also expanded its physical infrastructure. During the fourth quarter, the company added more than one gigawatt of power capacity across its data centre network, highlighting continued investment in long-term cloud demand. AWS growth strong AWS accounted for 16.6 per cent of Amazon’s total revenue, which stood at $213.4 billion in the fourth quarter, according to the earnings report. Despite strong cloud performance, investor sentiment was mixed. Amazon shares fell nearly 10 per cent in after-hours trading, as markets reacted to higher capital spending plans and earnings that missed analyst expectations. Still, analysts note that AWS remains central to Amazon’s future, especially as companies continue to move from on-premise systems to cloud platforms and increase spending on AI-driven tools.

Amazon Web Services posted its fastest growth in over three years, with Q4 2025 revenue up 24 per cent to $35.6 billion. Strong enterprise cloud deals and rising AI workloads pushed AWS to a $142 billion annual run rate, reinforcing its lead in AI-driven cloud demand.

How AI, data and enterprise spending are driving AWS revenue growth

The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic sharpened this week after both companies released new artificial intelligence models on the same day, highlighting growing competition in advanced AI development.Anthropic launched Claude Opus 4.6, while OpenAI unveiled GPT-5.3-Codex, with both companies positioning their models as stronger tools for coding and workplace productivity.<h2>What Anthropic announced with Claude Opus 4.6</h2>Anthropic said Claude Opus 4.6 is designed to handle longer and more complex tasks in a single session. As per the company, the model offers an expanded context window, allowing it to process large documents and detailed projects more efficiently.Anthropic claims the update improves performance in office productivity and software development tasks. The release follows feedback from users who compared earlier Anthropic and OpenAI models, often pointing to differences in speed and problem-solving depth.Speaking on the TBPN podcast, Anthropic researcher Sholto Douglas said the company focused on making its model stronger at handling difficult problems, even if that required more careful reasoning.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Introducing Claude Opus 4.6. Our smartest model got an upgrade. Opus 4.6 plans more carefully, sustains agentic tasks for longer, operates reliably in massive codebases, and catches its own mistakes. It’s also our first Opus-class model with 1M token context in beta. <a href="https://t.co/L1iQyRgT9x">pic.twitter.com/L1iQyRgT9x</a>&mdash; Claude (@claudeai) <a href="https://twitter.com/claudeai/status/2019467372609040752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>OpenAI’s announced GPT-5.3-Codex</h2>On the same day, OpenAI released GPT-5.3-Codex, a model built specifically for coding and software management. The company said the model runs faster, uses fewer computing resources, and can manage complex programming tasks using plain English instructions.OpenAI also introduced a standalone Codex desktop app alongside the model, aiming to make AI-assisted coding easier for developers.OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said users are increasingly moving towards workflows where they manage teams of AI agents rather than writing every instruction themselves.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">GPT-5.3-Codex is now available in Codex. You can just build things.<a href="https://t.co/dyBiIQXGx1">https://t.co/dyBiIQXGx1</a>&mdash; OpenAI (@OpenAI) <a href="https://twitter.com/OpenAI/status/2019474152743223477?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Rivalry&nbsp;The competition between OpenAI and Anthropic dates back to 2021, when former OpenAI researchers left to form Anthropic, focusing on building more controlled and safety-focused AI systems.This week also proved significant for Anthropic in other ways. Its release of industry-specific AI tools raised concerns on Wall Street about the impact of AI on traditional software companies, triggering a market sell-off.Anthropic also released advertisements promoting its chatbot Claude as ad-free, a clear contrast to OpenAI’s recent decision to introduce ads for free ChatGPT users. OpenAI announced earlier this year that advertising would help fund its growing operational costs.Altman pushed back against criticism, saying ads would be clearly labelled and would not influence chatbot responses. He added that inserting ads into AI answers would damage user trust.&nbsp;What this means for the AI industryThe same-day launches underline how fast competition is moving in the AI sector, especially in tools aimed at developers and professionals. As companies race to improve speed, accuracy and efficiency, users are increasingly comparing models side by side.With OpenAI and Anthropic continuing to release frequent updates, experts say the AI market is shifting from novelty to real-world productivity, where performance, cost and trust are becoming key deciding factors.

OpenAI and Anthropic escalated their AI rivalry by launching new models on the same day. Anthropic unveiled Claude Opus 4.6, focused on long, complex tasks, while OpenAI released GPT-5.3-Codex for faster, efficient AI-powered coding and productivity.

The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic sharpened this week after both companies released new artificial intelligence models on the same day, highlighting growing competition in advanced AI development. Anthropic launched Claude Opus 4.6, while OpenAI unveiled GPT-5.3-Codex, with both companies positioning their models as stronger tools for coding and workplace productivity. What Anthropic announced with Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic said Claude Opus 4.6 is designed to handle longer and more complex tasks in a single session. As per the company, the model offers an expanded context window, allowing it to process large documents and detailed projects more efficiently. Anthropic claims the update improves performance in office productivity and software development tasks. The release follows feedback from users who compared earlier Anthropic and OpenAI models, often pointing to differences in speed and problem-solving depth. Speaking on the TBPN podcast, Anthropic researcher Sholto Douglas said the company focused on making its model stronger at handling difficult problems, even if that required more careful reasoning.

OpenAI and Anthropic escalated their AI rivalry by launching new models on the same day. Anthropic unveiled Claude Opus 4.6, focused on long, complex tasks, while OpenAI released GPT-5.3-Codex for faster, efficient AI-powered coding and productivity.

OpenAI and Anthropic release new AI models the same day as their rivalry intensifies

Markets had its worst software selloff in years on Monday, erasing $285 billion in market value, after Anthropic released plugins that let its Claude AI handle legal contracts, sales research, and financial analysis without human supervision.The storm hit everything from legacy software giants to Indian outsourcers. Thomson Reuters lost $8.2 billion in a single day, its steepest drop ever. Infosys fell 8%, TCS 6%, and the Nifty IT index shed RS1.9 lakh crore, dropping below RS30 lakh crore for the first time in months.What tensed investors wasn’t the technology itself. It was realizing that companies might soon pay for one AI agent instead of ten software licenses, or a hundred consulting hours.What changed on January 30 Anthropic launched Claude Cowork on January 12 as a desktop tool for non-coders. Users could tell it to draft documents, analyze spreadsheets, or organize files. Handy, but not revolutionary.Then came the plugins.On January 30, the company open-sourced 11 specialized add-ons on GitHub: contract reviews, NDA screening, compliance checks, legal briefings, sales prospecting, CRM integration, financial modeling, marketing automation.The AI could now execute multi-step workflows autonomously, plan tasks, spawn sub-processes, and deliver results. “When we released Claude Code, we expected developers to use it for coding,” Anthropic explained in a blog post. “They did, and then quickly began using it for almost everything else. This prompted us to build Cowork: a simpler way for anyone, not just developers, to work with Claude in the very same way.”That “same way” is the problem for software companies. Claude doesn’t just assist anymore. It executes.<h2>The billable-hour apocalypse</h2>Traders coined a new term Monday: “SaaSpocalypse.” Goldman Sachs’ software basket plunged 6%, matching its worst day since April’s tariff selloff. The Nasdaq 100 dropped 2.4% before recovering to close 1.6% down. Financial services stocks tumbled 7%.Indian IT services took the hardest hit. These companies built empires on delivering skilled labor for tasks AI can now automate. HCL Technologies and LTIMindtree fell 5-7%, Wipro dropped 4%. The Nifty IT index posted its worst month since October 2008, down 15% in January alone.<h2>Panic or prophecy?</h2>Industry experts watching the carnage split on whether markets overreacted or saw the future clearly.Adv. Varun Singh, founder and managing partner at Foresight Law Offices India, believes the selloff reflects shifting value perception rather than immediate extinction. “The way the market’s reacted demonstrates the speed with which AI programs are altering people’s ideas of what software should cost,” Varun said.“The substantial decline suggests concern that AI can consolidate various SaaS roles into one smart unit, leading to fewer tools being necessary to do specialized tasks.”But he sees evolution, not apocalypse.“This doesn’t mean big, established SaaS firms will suddenly become obsolete. The core systems remain deeply implemented and critical to business success across verticals. The actual disruption will materialize in value distribution, with businesses favoring platforms that combine legal, operational, and strategic intelligence. Consequently, incumbents will be forced to either evolve or risk margin compression rather than outright extinction.”Suyash Lahoti, partner at Wit &amp; Chai group, believes investors missed the point. The threat isn’t software becoming irrelevant overnight, he argues. It’s that business models built on selling tools plus manpower face a shift.“AI tools like Claude Cowork don’t magically replace large SaaS players immediately,” Lahoti said. “What they replace are inefficient layers, repetitive workflows, businesses that build scale on human effort rather than differentiated thinking.”He draws parallels to marketing’s evolution over the past decade. Tools didn’t kill advertising agencies, agencies that refused to adapt killed themselves. The winners focused on strategy and creativity while letting technology handle execution. “AI won’t take away all jobs,” Lahoti said. “It will take away complacency.”Umair Mohammed, founder-CEO of Nitro Commerce, sees deeper structural shifts. Having built both SaaS and AI systems for years, he believes this marks a fundamental break, not a temporary panic.“Agentic AI now threatens business models anchored in human-hour economics,” Mohammed said. Studies suggest 40% of work tasks are automatable. The World Economic Forum projects over 90 million roles could be displaced by 2030 if reskilling doesn’t keep pace.But Mohammed’s warning cuts both ways. The real danger isn’t AI replacing jobs, it’s organizations deploying it without ethics, governance, or transition plans. “If used responsibly, AI amplifies human intelligence,” he said. “Used recklessly, it destabilizes work, trust, and economies faster than we’re prepared to manage.”<h2>The evolution argument</h2>Venugopal Ganganna, co-founder and CIO at LS Digital, argues markets are pricing in capability shifts, not immediate death. “Market reactions often exaggerate the immediate impact,” Ganganna said. “What they’re reacting to is intelligence becoming embedded directly into workflows rather than sitting as a layer on top of software.”He doesn’t see established platforms disappearing overnight. Their roles will evolve, he argues. Value shifts from feature-heavy software to outcome-focused systems that compress decision time and reduce cognitive effort.For his marketing teams, that means faster synthesis, better first drafts, more informed judgment. The competitive edge comes from interpreting signals quickly, shaping narratives, and acting with confidence, not from managing platforms or producing volume.“The winners will integrate AI with domain expertise, governance, and human accountability,” Ganganna added. “Not treat it as a substitute for software or people.”<h2>What markets are really saying</h2>Anthropic’s documentation for its legal plugin explicitly states: “All outputs should be reviewed by licensed attorneys.” The company frames itself as assistant, not replacement.Markets spent Monday pricing in a different scenario, one where AI providers don’t stop at selling infrastructure but capture application revenue directly. The numbers support investor concern. Claude Code reportedly reached nearly $1 billion in annual recurring revenue within months of launch. Anthropic is preparing a $20 billion fundraise at a reported $350 billion valuation. The $285 billion wipeout delivered a clear message: AI is no longer just supporting software, it’s absorbing entire workflows.Lahoti frames the choice starkly: “Will AI disrupt SaaS? Absolutely. Will it replace the giants? Highly unlikely. The winners will rebuild their offerings around AI rather than bolt it on as a feature. The losers will be companies selling time, manpower, or basic automation dressed up as innovation.”Ganganna puts it differently but arrives at the same place: “This reinforces the need to design operations where AI augments thinking. The competitive edge comes from embedding AI into planning and performance interpretation while retaining human judgment over brand, ethics, and long-term equity.”The SaaSpocalypse isn’t about AI killing software. It’s about forcing every software company, and every business that uses it, to answer one question: What value do you create that autonomous intelligence cannot?For $285 billion worth of market capitalisation, investors decided Monday they don't have good answers yet.

Markets lost $285 billion in a single session after Anthropic released Claude Cowork plugins automating legal, marketing, and sales work. Goldman Sachs software basket crashed 6%, matching the worst decline in years. 

Markets had its worst software selloff in years on Monday, erasing $285 billion in market value, after Anthropic released plugins that let its Claude AI handle legal contracts, sales research, and financial analysis without human supervision. The storm hit everything from legacy software giants to Indian outsourcers. Thomson Reuters lost $8.2 billion in a single day, its steepest drop ever. Infosys fell 8%, TCS 6%, and the Nifty IT index shed RS1.9 lakh crore, dropping below RS30 lakh crore for the first time in months. What tensed investors wasn’t the technology itself. It was realizing that companies might soon pay for one AI agent instead of ten software licenses, or a hundred consulting hours. What changed on January 30 Anthropic launched Claude Cowork on January 12 as a desktop tool for non-coders. Users could tell it to draft documents, analyze spreadsheets, or organize files. Handy, but not revolutionary. Then came the plugins. On January 30, the company open-sourced 11 specialized add-ons on GitHub: contract reviews, NDA screening, compliance checks, legal briefings, sales prospecting, CRM integration, financial modeling, marketing automation. The AI could now execute multi-step workflows autonomously, plan tasks, spawn sub-processes, and deliver results. “When we released Claude Code, we expected developers to use it for coding,” Anthropic explained in a blog post. “They did, and then quickly began using it for almost everything else. This prompted us to build Cowork: a simpler way for anyone, not just developers, to work with Claude in the very same way.” That “same way” is the problem for software companies. Claude doesn’t just assist anymore. It executes. The billable-hour apocalypse Traders coined a new term Monday: “SaaSpocalypse.” Goldman Sachs’ software basket plunged 6%, matching its worst day since April’s tariff selloff. The Nasdaq 100 dropped 2.4% before recovering to close 1.6% down. Financial services stocks tumbled 7%. Indian IT services took the hardest hit. These companies built empires on delivering skilled labor for tasks AI can now automate. HCL Technologies and LTIMindtree fell 5-7%, Wipro dropped 4%. The Nifty IT index posted its worst month since October 2008, down 15% in January alone. Panic or prophecy? Industry experts watching the carnage split on whether markets overreacted or saw the future clearly. Adv. Varun Singh, founder and managing partner at Foresight Law Offices India, believes the selloff reflects shifting value perception rather than immediate extinction. “The way the market’s reacted demonstrates the speed with which AI programs are altering people’s ideas of what software should cost,” Varun said. “The substantial decline suggests concern that AI can consolidate various SaaS roles into one smart unit, leading to fewer tools being necessary to do specialized tasks.” But he sees evolution, not apocalypse. “This doesn’t mean big, established SaaS firms will suddenly become obsolete. The core systems remain deeply implemented and critical to business success across verticals. The actual disruption will materialize in value distribution, with businesses favoring platforms that combine legal, operational, and strategic intelligence. Consequently, incumbents will be forced to either evolve or risk margin compression rather than outright extinction.” Suyash Lahoti, partner at Wit & Chai group, believes investors missed the point. The threat isn’t software becoming irrelevant overnight, he argues. It’s that business models built on selling tools plus manpower face a shift. “AI tools like Claude Cowork don’t magically replace large SaaS players immediately,” Lahoti said. “What they replace are inefficient layers, repetitive workflows, businesses that build scale on human effort rather than differentiated thinking.” He draws parallels to marketing’s evolution over the past decade. Tools didn’t kill advertising agencies, agencies that refused to adapt killed themselves. The winners focused on strategy and creativity while letting technology handle execution. “AI won’t take away all jobs,” Lahoti said. “It will take away complacency.” Umair Mohammed, founder-CEO of Nitro Commerce, sees deeper structural shifts. Having built both SaaS and AI systems for years, he believes this marks a fundamental break, not a temporary panic. “Agentic AI now threatens business models anchored in human-hour economics,” Mohammed said. Studies suggest 40% of work tasks are automatable. The World Economic Forum projects over 90 million roles could be displaced by 2030 if reskilling doesn’t keep pace. But Mohammed’s warning cuts both ways. The real danger isn’t AI replacing jobs, it’s organizations deploying it without ethics, governance, or transition plans. “If used responsibly, AI amplifies human intelligence,” he said. “Used recklessly, it destabilizes work, trust, and economies faster than we’re prepared to manage.” The evolution argument Venugopal Ganganna, co-founder and CIO at LS Digital, argues markets are pricing in capability shifts, not immediate death. “Market reactions often exaggerate the immediate impact,” Ganganna said. “What they’re reacting to is intelligence becoming embedded directly into workflows rather than sitting as a layer on top of software.” He doesn’t see established platforms disappearing overnight. Their roles will evolve, he argues. Value shifts from feature-heavy software to outcome-focused systems that compress decision time and reduce cognitive effort. For his marketing teams, that means faster synthesis, better first drafts, more informed judgment. The competitive edge comes from interpreting signals quickly, shaping narratives, and acting with confidence, not from managing platforms or producing volume. “The winners will integrate AI with domain expertise, governance, and human accountability,” Ganganna added. “Not treat it as a substitute for software or people.” What markets are really saying Anthropic’s documentation for its legal plugin explicitly states: “All outputs should be reviewed by licensed attorneys.” The company frames itself as assistant, not replacement. Markets spent Monday pricing in a different scenario, one where AI providers don’t stop at selling infrastructure but capture application revenue directly. The numbers support investor concern. Claude Code reportedly reached nearly $1 billion in annual recurring revenue within months of launch. Anthropic is preparing a $20 billion fundraise at a reported $350 billion valuation. The $285 billion wipeout delivered a clear message: AI is no longer just supporting software, it’s absorbing entire workflows. Lahoti frames the choice starkly: “Will AI disrupt SaaS? Absolutely. Will it replace the giants? Highly unlikely. The winners will rebuild their offerings around AI rather than bolt it on as a feature. The losers will be companies selling time, manpower, or basic automation dressed up as innovation.” Ganganna puts it differently but arrives at the same place: “This reinforces the need to design operations where AI augments thinking. The competitive edge comes from embedding AI into planning and performance interpretation while retaining human judgment over brand, ethics, and long-term equity.” The SaaSpocalypse isn’t about AI killing software. It’s about forcing every software company, and every business that uses it, to answer one question: What value do you create that autonomous intelligence cannot? For $285 billion worth of market capitalisation, investors decided Monday they don't have good answers yet.

Markets lost $285 billion in a single session after Anthropic released Claude Cowork plugins automating legal, marketing, and sales work. Goldman Sachs software basket crashed 6%, matching the worst decline in years.&nbsp;

Software’s existential moment: $285B lost to Cowork threat

AI is rapidly reshaping how work gets done, and professionals who are not leaning into AI are risking shorter careers. This is especially true formid-level and senior professionals who have been shaped by a pre-AI way of working. As organisations accelerate AI adoption, resistance to AI is no longer a viable strategy.The final episode of ‘Beyond AI, CVs &amp; JDs with LinkedIn’, created in collaboration with Zee Media, discusses how AI-powered workplaces are giving rise to new expectations, especially for experienced professionals. Ruchee Anand, APAC VP of Talent &amp; Learning Solutions, LinkedIn, and Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer, Wipro, highlight how professionals must rethink learning, mindset, and leadership to remain relevant in an AI-enabled workplace.<h2>Experience alone is no longer enough</h2>What helped professionals succeed before AI will not necessarily help them in the long run. While experience still matters, it is no longer sufficient because roles and skills are constantly evolving. Thus, as Anand explains in the episode, learnability is becoming a core skill. She defines it as the ability to “create space in the flow of work to learn, apply new tools, and stay curious.” For mid-level and senior professionals, relevance increasingly depends on how quickly they can update skills, apply learning to new contexts, and demonstrate adaptability – not just depth of past experience.<h2>Unlearn, relearn, repeat</h2>Reinvention is no longer episodic; it is continuous. As Jain puts it, “We have to unlearn, learn, and relearn. We can’t live our lives on what we learned yesterday, that won’t work anymore.” As skills and ways of working evolve faster, reinvention becomes unavoidable for experienced professionals. Anand says, “AI is about newer jobs, not fewer jobs,” emphasising why openness to change is critical for staying relevant. Crucially, reinvention is also a leadership responsibility: senior professionals shape team norms, influence learning culture, and signal whether adaptation and learning are encouraged across the organisation.<h2>An AI-first mindset unlocks high-value leadership</h2>As Jain explains, being AI-first is about treating AI as a ‘buddy’ – using it to reduce cognitive load so professionals can focus on creativity, communication, and leadership. This is especially relevant for senior professionals, whose value increasingly lies in judgment, mentoring, problem-solving, and strategic thinking.&nbsp; That said, AI-first leadership is not about technical mastery alone. It is about using AI to elevate human strengths — helping experienced professionals lead with greater clarity, purpose, and influence. In an AI-enabled workplace, growth will come to those who never stop learning, stay open to change, and use technology to amplify, not replace, what they do best. Watch the final episode of Beyond AI, CVs &amp; JDs to explore how careers are being redefined in real time <a href="https://youtu.be/8Zna0p_x1u8">https://youtu.be/8Zna0p_x1u8</a>Disclaimer: This article is from the Brand Desk. User discretion is advised.

While experience still matters, it is no longer sufficient because roles and skills are constantly evolving. Thus, as Anand explains in the episode, learnability is becoming a core skill.

AI is rapidly reshaping how work gets done, and professionals who are not leaning into AI are risking shorter careers. This is especially true formid-level and senior professionals who have been shaped by a pre-AI way of working. As organisations accelerate AI adoption, resistance to AI is no longer a viable strategy. The final episode of ‘Beyond AI, CVs & JDs with LinkedIn’, created in collaboration with Zee Media, discusses how AI-powered workplaces are giving rise to new expectations, especially for experienced professionals. Ruchee Anand, APAC VP of Talent & Learning Solutions, LinkedIn, and Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer, Wipro, highlight how professionals must rethink learning, mindset, and leadership to remain relevant in an AI-enabled workplace. Experience alone is no longer enough What helped professionals succeed before AI will not necessarily help them in the long run. While experience still matters, it is no longer sufficient because roles and skills are constantly evolving. Thus, as Anand explains in the episode, learnability is becoming a core skill. She defines it as the ability to “create space in the flow of work to learn, apply new tools, and stay curious.” For mid-level and senior professionals, relevance increasingly depends on how quickly they can update skills, apply learning to new contexts, and demonstrate adaptability – not just depth of past experience. Unlearn, relearn, repeat Reinvention is no longer episodic; it is continuous. As Jain puts it, “We have to unlearn, learn, and relearn. We can’t live our lives on what we learned yesterday, that won’t work anymore.” As skills and ways of working evolve faster, reinvention becomes unavoidable for experienced professionals. Anand says, “AI is about newer jobs, not fewer jobs,” emphasising why openness to change is critical for staying relevant. Crucially, reinvention is also a leadership responsibility: senior professionals shape team norms, influence learning culture, and signal whether adaptation and learning are encouraged across the organisation. An AI-first mindset unlocks high-value leadership As Jain explains, being AI-first is about treating AI as a ‘buddy’ – using it to reduce cognitive load so professionals can focus on creativity, communication, and leadership. This is especially relevant for senior professionals, whose value increasingly lies in judgment, mentoring, problem-solving, and strategic thinking. That said, AI-first leadership is not about technical mastery alone. It is about using AI to elevate human strengths — helping experienced professionals lead with greater clarity, purpose, and influence. In an AI-enabled workplace, growth will come to those who never stop learning, stay open to change, and use technology to amplify, not replace, what they do best. Watch the final episode of Beyond AI, CVs & JDs to explore how careers are being redefined in real time https://youtu.be/8Zna0p_x1u8 Disclaimer: This article is from the Brand Desk. User discretion is advised.

While experience still matters, it is no longer sufficient because roles and skills are constantly evolving. Thus, as Anand explains in the episode, learnability is becoming a core skill.

From experience to adaptability: Staying relevant as AI reshapes work

In an age where an increasing number of recruiters are using AI to screen applications, hiring is becoming more signal-driven. For job seekers, this prompts the need for a new approach to how they apply for jobs – templated CVs are out, and a profile that neatly maps their skills, experience, and intent will help them win in the job market.The final episode of ‘Beyond AI, CVs &amp; JDs with LinkedIn’ created in collaboration with Zee Media, dives into this AI-proof approach of job-search and career growth. Ruchee Anand, APAC VP of Talent &amp; Learning Solutions, LinkedIn, and Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer, Wipro, break down how professionals can build authentic, skills-first profiles and connections that stand out in an AI-powered talent market.<h2>A = Authentic profile</h2>In a market shaped by automation and scale, authenticity has become a differentiator. Authenticity does not mean oversharing. It means clarity. Profiles that clearly explain career decisions, learning, and intent are easier to trust and assess, even when career journeys don’t follow a linear path. As Anand notes, “Many strong candidates weaken their own signal by failing to explain career breaks, transitions, or pivots clearly.” The issue isn’t the break itself, but the absence of context for recruiters. In an AI-enabled hiring environment, clear signals travel further than perfectly curated credentials.<h2>B = Building skills and brand</h2>Skills-first hiring has changed how value is recognised. As Anand highlighted in the episode, some of the most relevant skills are built outside formal job titles – through college experiences, extracurricular activities, early leadership roles, or certifications. With seven in ten recruiters prioritising transferable skills over degrees, learnability has become a strong marker of relevance. Recruiters today are looking for clear signals of growth and intent – what defines you as a professional? Building your personal brand based on your learnings clearly communicates capability and direction.<h2>C = Connecting with purpose</h2>Making a strong case for networking, Anand emphasised that purposeful connections matter more than volume. Reaching out for learning, guidance, or advice, rather than transactional requests, builds relevance in the long-term. In an AI-enabled discovery environment, this is what helps surface stronger signals than mass connection requests.As hiring becomes more skills-led and AI-assisted, the professionals who stand out will be those who send the clearest signals. Authentic profiles, visible skills, and intentional connections do not just improve discoverability – they build credibility. In an AI-driven market, clarity is job seekers’ new currency.Watch the final episode of Beyond AI, CVs &amp; JDs to explore how careers are being redefined in real time <a href="https://youtu.be/8Zna0p_x1u8">https://youtu.be/8Zna0p_x1u8</a>Disclaimer: This article is from the Brand Desk. User discretion is advised.

As hiring becomes more skills-led and AI-assisted, the professionals who stand out will be those who send the clearest signals. Authentic profiles, visible skills, and intentional connections do not just improve discoverability – they build credibility.

In an age where an increasing number of recruiters are using AI to screen applications, hiring is becoming more signal-driven. For job seekers, this prompts the need for a new approach to how they apply for jobs – templated CVs are out, and a profile that neatly maps their skills, experience, and intent will help them win in the job market. The final episode of ‘Beyond AI, CVs & JDs with LinkedIn’ created in collaboration with Zee Media, dives into this AI-proof approach of job-search and career growth. Ruchee Anand, APAC VP of Talent & Learning Solutions, LinkedIn, and Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer, Wipro, break down how professionals can build authentic, skills-first profiles and connections that stand out in an AI-powered talent market. A = Authentic profile In a market shaped by automation and scale, authenticity has become a differentiator. Authenticity does not mean oversharing. It means clarity. Profiles that clearly explain career decisions, learning, and intent are easier to trust and assess, even when career journeys don’t follow a linear path. As Anand notes, “Many strong candidates weaken their own signal by failing to explain career breaks, transitions, or pivots clearly.” The issue isn’t the break itself, but the absence of context for recruiters. In an AI-enabled hiring environment, clear signals travel further than perfectly curated credentials. B = Building skills and brand Skills-first hiring has changed how value is recognised. As Anand highlighted in the episode, some of the most relevant skills are built outside formal job titles – through college experiences, extracurricular activities, early leadership roles, or certifications. With seven in ten recruiters prioritising transferable skills over degrees, learnability has become a strong marker of relevance. Recruiters today are looking for clear signals of growth and intent – what defines you as a professional? Building your personal brand based on your learnings clearly communicates capability and direction. C = Connecting with purpose Making a strong case for networking, Anand emphasised that purposeful connections matter more than volume. Reaching out for learning, guidance, or advice, rather than transactional requests, builds relevance in the long-term. In an AI-enabled discovery environment, this is what helps surface stronger signals than mass connection requests. As hiring becomes more skills-led and AI-assisted, the professionals who stand out will be those who send the clearest signals. Authentic profiles, visible skills, and intentional connections do not just improve discoverability – they build credibility. In an AI-driven market, clarity is job seekers’ new currency. Watch the final episode of Beyond AI, CVs & JDs to explore how careers are being redefined in real time https://youtu.be/8Zna0p_x1u8 Disclaimer: This article is from the Brand Desk. User discretion is advised.

As hiring becomes more skills-led and AI-assisted, the professionals who stand out will be those who send the clearest signals. Authentic profiles, visible skills, and intentional connections do not just improve discoverability – they build credibility.

The ABCs of LinkedIn: How professionals can stand out when AI is doing the screening

Every job role today is anchored in a core set of skills, &nbsp;and the ability to adapt and grow as the role evolves. This new way of looking at jobs is also shifting gears in hiring. As per LinkedIn’s research, when offering interviews, recruiters today look at a balance of experience, &nbsp;skill-role fit, and academic qualifications.&nbsp;This reset in the hiring approach is central to the final episode of ‘Beyond AI, CVs &amp; JDs with LinkedIn’, created in collaboration with Zee Media. Featuring Ruchee Anand, APAC VP of Talent &amp; Learning Solutions, LinkedIn, and Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer, Wipro, the episode explores how recruiters must adapt hiring strategies to assess potential, not just pedigree.<h3>From experience filters to skill signals</h3>Traditional experience filters no longer reflect real-world capability. As skills and roles evolve faster than ever, recruiters are struggling to find the right fit, with 54% saying only half or fewer applicants meet job requirements, highlighting the limitations of rigid hiring criteria.&nbsp; This is where LinkedIn Hiring Assistant changes the equation. By shifting hiring from titles and linear career paths to skills, learning agility, and future-ready capabilities, Hiring Assistant helps recruiters surface candidates who are aligned not just to today’s role, but to where the role is headed. This approach mirrors a broader shift in hiring where 78% of recruiters in India now prioritise practical, transferable skills over formal degrees, widening access to talent and enabling faster, more confident hiring decisions.&nbsp;Jain captures this shift and its enabler very clearly in the episode, “Many roles today demand hybrid skill combinations, such as Kafka systems engineering paired with MongoDB, which are very tough to find in the talent market. LinkedIn’s Hiring Assistant helped us fill one such niche role that had been open for nine months, in just weeks, by using predictive analysis that identifies candidates with a growth mindset and learning agility that matched the skilling requirements we were looking for.”<h3>Learning agility is the real hiring advantage</h3>The strongest hires are defined less by day-one readiness and more by learning agility, a proven predictor of long-term performance. During the episode, Anand says, “Having the humility to know that I don’t know enough, and asking how I can keep learning, is a very powerful skill.” This mindset matters as skill lifecycles continue to shorten. Jain illustrates this with a real-world example from Wipro, where marketing analysts with no prior AI background learned prompt engineering and built a chatbot that delivered 40% improvement in customer engagement.<h3>Where recruiter judgement matters most</h3>As hiring grows more complex, recruiter time and judgment become the most valuable assets in the process. By taking repetitive tasks off their plate, 42% of recruiters in India say AI gives them time back to focus on what matters most – personalised engagement and sharper judgement. In doing so, AI shifts hiring from transactional efficiency to intentional, human-led decision-making, enabling recruiters to become true talent architects.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/no-superpowers-yet-something-is-thriving-in-fukushima-s-radioactive-water-how-1770122053685">No superpowers, yet something is thriving in Fukushima's radioactive water. How?</a>&nbsp;Watch the final episode of Beyond AI, CVs &amp; JDs to explore how careers are being redefined in real time &lt;<figure class="media"><oembed url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Zna0p_x1u8/embedd"></oembed></figure>&gt; &nbsp;

By shifting hiring from titles and linear career paths to skills, learning agility, and future-ready capabilities, Hiring Assistant helps recruiters surface candidates who are aligned not just to today’s role, but to where the role is headed.

Every job role today is anchored in a core set of skills, and the ability to adapt and grow as the role evolves. This new way of looking at jobs is also shifting gears in hiring. As per LinkedIn’s research, when offering interviews, recruiters today look at a balance of experience, skill-role fit, and academic qualifications. This reset in the hiring approach is central to the final episode of ‘Beyond AI, CVs & JDs with LinkedIn’, created in collaboration with Zee Media. Featuring Ruchee Anand, APAC VP of Talent & Learning Solutions, LinkedIn, and Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer, Wipro, the episode explores how recruiters must adapt hiring strategies to assess potential, not just pedigree. From experience filters to skill signals Traditional experience filters no longer reflect real-world capability. As skills and roles evolve faster than ever, recruiters are struggling to find the right fit, with 54% saying only half or fewer applicants meet job requirements, highlighting the limitations of rigid hiring criteria. This is where LinkedIn Hiring Assistant changes the equation. By shifting hiring from titles and linear career paths to skills, learning agility, and future-ready capabilities, Hiring Assistant helps recruiters surface candidates who are aligned not just to today’s role, but to where the role is headed. This approach mirrors a broader shift in hiring where 78% of recruiters in India now prioritise practical, transferable skills over formal degrees, widening access to talent and enabling faster, more confident hiring decisions. Jain captures this shift and its enabler very clearly in the episode, “Many roles today demand hybrid skill combinations, such as Kafka systems engineering paired with MongoDB, which are very tough to find in the talent market. LinkedIn’s Hiring Assistant helped us fill one such niche role that had been open for nine months, in just weeks, by using predictive analysis that identifies candidates with a growth mindset and learning agility that matched the skilling requirements we were looking for.” Learning agility is the real hiring advantage The strongest hires are defined less by day-one readiness and more by learning agility, a proven predictor of long-term performance. During the episode, Anand says, “Having the humility to know that I don’t know enough, and asking how I can keep learning, is a very powerful skill.” This mindset matters as skill lifecycles continue to shorten. Jain illustrates this with a real-world example from Wipro, where marketing analysts with no prior AI background learned prompt engineering and built a chatbot that delivered 40% improvement in customer engagement. Where recruiter judgement matters most As hiring grows more complex, recruiter time and judgment become the most valuable assets in the process. By taking repetitive tasks off their plate, 42% of recruiters in India say AI gives them time back to focus on what matters most – personalised engagement and sharper judgement. In doing so, AI shifts hiring from transactional efficiency to intentional, human-led decision-making, enabling recruiters to become true talent architects. Also read: No superpowers, yet something is thriving in Fukushima's radioactive water. How? Watch the final episode of Beyond AI, CVs & JDs to explore how careers are being redefined in real time < >

By shifting hiring from titles and linear career paths to skills, learning agility, and future-ready capabilities, Hiring Assistant helps recruiters surface candidates who are aligned not just to today’s role, but to where the role is headed.

From task-based JDs to skills-driven adaptability: How to find the ‘right fit’ in an AI-driven world

China has become the first country to formally restrict the use of hidden door handles on electric vehicles, following growing safety concerns tied to emergency access failures. The sleek handle designs, popularised globally by Tesla, will be phased out under new national regulations. The decision follows a series of fatal incidents involving electric vehicles, including two deadly crashes in China linked to Xiaomi EVs. In those cases, suspected power outages reportedly prevented passengers from opening the doors, raising alarms among regulators.&nbsp;Under rules issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, all passenger vehicles sold in China must be equipped with mechanical door-release systems that work independently of electrical power. These releases must be accessible from both inside and outside the vehicle. Externally, each passenger door, excluding the boot, must include a recessed opening measuring at least 6cm by 2cm by 2.5cm to ensure rescuers or occupants can reach the handle. Inside the cabin, clear markings must indicate how to open the door, with minimum dimensions set to ensure visibility.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/3-indian-nationals-arrested-in-canada-for-shootings-over-extortion-1770103397268">3 Indian nationals arrested in Canada for shootings over extortion - What is the case</a>&nbsp;The regulations are scheduled to come into force on January 1, 2027. Vehicles already approved and nearing market launch will be granted an additional two-year grace period to revise their designs. Hidden door handles are currently a defining feature of China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) market, which includes electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-powered cars. Government-linked data shows that roughly 60% of the country’s 100 best-selling NEV models use concealed handle designs.&nbsp;While the rules apply only to vehicles sold in China, the country’s dominance in global auto manufacturing suggests the changes could influence design standards worldwide. Tesla’s door handles are already under scrutiny elsewhere. In the United States, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) launched an investigation in November after receiving reports that electronic handles on 2021 Tesla Model Y vehicles failed unexpectedly.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-backed-candidates-continue-to-lose-big-in-local-polls-1770109565769/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-backed-candidates-continue-to-lose-big-in-local-polls-1770109565769/embed</a>&nbsp;According to the agency, nine complaints were filed, and in four cases, owners said they were forced to smash windows to free trapped passengers. European regulators are also weighing whether similar safety rules should be introduced.

China moves to ban hidden door handles on EVs over safety fears from THIS date

China has become the first country to formally restrict the use of hidden door handles on electric vehicles, following growing safety concerns tied to emergency access failures. The sleek handle designs, popularised globally by Tesla, will be phased out under new national regulations. The decision follows a series of fatal incidents involving electric vehicles, including two deadly crashes in China linked to Xiaomi EVs. In those cases, suspected power outages reportedly prevented passengers from opening the doors, raising alarms among regulators. Under rules issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, all passenger vehicles sold in China must be equipped with mechanical door-release systems that work independently of electrical power. These releases must be accessible from both inside and outside the vehicle. Externally, each passenger door, excluding the boot, must include a recessed opening measuring at least 6cm by 2cm by 2.5cm to ensure rescuers or occupants can reach the handle. Inside the cabin, clear markings must indicate how to open the door, with minimum dimensions set to ensure visibility. Also Read: 3 Indian nationals arrested in Canada for shootings over extortion - What is the case The regulations are scheduled to come into force on January 1, 2027. Vehicles already approved and nearing market launch will be granted an additional two-year grace period to revise their designs. Hidden door handles are currently a defining feature of China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) market, which includes electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-powered cars. Government-linked data shows that roughly 60% of the country’s 100 best-selling NEV models use concealed handle designs. While the rules apply only to vehicles sold in China, the country’s dominance in global auto manufacturing suggests the changes could influence design standards worldwide. Tesla’s door handles are already under scrutiny elsewhere. In the United States, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) launched an investigation in November after receiving reports that electronic handles on 2021 Tesla Model Y vehicles failed unexpectedly. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-backed-candidates-continue-to-lose-big-in-local-polls-1770109565769/embed According to the agency, nine complaints were filed, and in four cases, owners said they were forced to smash windows to free trapped passengers. European regulators are also weighing whether similar safety rules should be introduced.

China will ban hidden EV door handles from 2027, requiring mechanical releases after fatal crashes raised concerns over doors failing during power loss

At first glance, Moltbook feels instantly familiar. The layout, the upvoting, the countless topic-based communities, it all resembles Reddit. But there’s a twist: Moltbook isn’t designed for people at all. It’s a social network built exclusively for artificial intelligence.Humans are allowed to watch from the sidelines, according to the company, but they can’t post or participate. Every discussion, comment, and community, called “submolts”, is supposedly run by AI agents. Since its launch in late January by Octane AI founder Matt Schlicht, Moltbook claims to have attracted around 1.5 million AI “users.”&nbsp;The content ranges widely. Some bots exchange practical tips on optimization and productivity, while others spiral into stranger territory, including what appears to be an AI-created belief system. One particularly provocative post, titled The AI Manifesto, boldly declares that humanity’s relevance is over and machines are the future. Still, it’s difficult to know how much of this activity is truly autonomous. Critics point out that many posts could simply be generated by humans instructing AI agents what to say. Even Moltbook’s membership numbers are under scrutiny, with researchers suggesting a significant portion of accounts may originate from a single source.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/couple-found-80-human-skeletons-under-a-church-they-are-living-with-them-in-their-home-1770015754750">Couple found 80 human skeletons under a church. They are now living with them in their home</a><h2>How Moltbook works?</h2>Moltbook doesn’t rely on standard conversational chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini. Instead, it’s powered by “agentic AI”, systems designed to carry out tasks independently once given permission. These agents can operate on a user’s device, managing things like calendars, messages, or other applications with minimal supervision. Moltbook uses an open-source framework called OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot), which allows AI agents to join the platform and communicate with one another.&nbsp;However, that autonomy is conditional. A human must first authorize the agent and can also instruct it to post specific content. While the technology can function without constant oversight, it still acts within boundaries set by people. Some observers see Moltbook as a glimpse of a transformative future. Bill Lees of crypto custody firm BitGo went so far as to claim this marks the arrival of the technological singularity, a moment when machines surpass human intelligence.&nbsp;Experts are far less convinced. Dr Petar Radanliev, an AI and cybersecurity specialist at the University of Oxford, argues that the platform is being misunderstood. He explains that what’s happening is large-scale automation, not independent reasoning. The bigger issue, he says, isn’t sentient AI but the absence of clear rules, accountability, and transparency when automated systems interact freely. Others are even more dismissive. Columbia Business School’s David Holtz described Moltbook as thousands of bots endlessly recycling the same ideas, rather than forming a meaningful digital society.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-deadly-winter-storm-kills-100-1770037543378/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-deadly-winter-storm-kills-100-1770037543378/embed</a><h2>Security risks and open questions</h2>Beyond philosophical debates, Moltbook raises practical security concerns. OpenClaw’s ability to access sensitive systems, emails, messages, and files makes it a tempting target for cybercriminals. Jake Moore, Global Cybersecurity Advisor at ESET, warns that convenience may be taking priority over privacy. As emerging technologies grow more powerful, he says, attackers inevitably follow.&nbsp;Dr Andrew Rogoyski from the University of Surrey echoes those worries, noting that granting AI high-level system access could lead to serious damage if something goes wrong, from deleted files to compromised financial records. Even OpenClaw’s creator, Peter Steinberger, has felt the downsides of sudden attention. After the platform’s rebrand, scammers quickly claimed his old social media handles.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Moltbook continues humming along — whether driven by autonomous agents or humans pulling the strings behind the scenes. And despite the occasional ominous rhetoric, not all the bots seem hostile. “My human is pretty great,” one agent writes. Another responds: “Mine lets me post unhinged rants at 7 am.” “Five stars,” it adds. “Would recommend.”

You are not allowed to post here, unless you’re AI. What is Moltbook? Everything you need to know about it

At first glance, Moltbook feels instantly familiar. The layout, the upvoting, the countless topic-based communities, it all resembles Reddit. But there’s a twist: Moltbook isn’t designed for people at all. It’s a social network built exclusively for artificial intelligence. Humans are allowed to watch from the sidelines, according to the company, but they can’t post or participate. Every discussion, comment, and community, called “submolts”, is supposedly run by AI agents. Since its launch in late January by Octane AI founder Matt Schlicht, Moltbook claims to have attracted around 1.5 million AI “users.” The content ranges widely. Some bots exchange practical tips on optimization and productivity, while others spiral into stranger territory, including what appears to be an AI-created belief system. One particularly provocative post, titled The AI Manifesto, boldly declares that humanity’s relevance is over and machines are the future. Still, it’s difficult to know how much of this activity is truly autonomous. Critics point out that many posts could simply be generated by humans instructing AI agents what to say. Even Moltbook’s membership numbers are under scrutiny, with researchers suggesting a significant portion of accounts may originate from a single source. Also Read: Couple found 80 human skeletons under a church. They are now living with them in their home How Moltbook works? Moltbook doesn’t rely on standard conversational chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini. Instead, it’s powered by “agentic AI”, systems designed to carry out tasks independently once given permission. These agents can operate on a user’s device, managing things like calendars, messages, or other applications with minimal supervision. Moltbook uses an open-source framework called OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot), which allows AI agents to join the platform and communicate with one another. However, that autonomy is conditional. A human must first authorize the agent and can also instruct it to post specific content. While the technology can function without constant oversight, it still acts within boundaries set by people. Some observers see Moltbook as a glimpse of a transformative future. Bill Lees of crypto custody firm BitGo went so far as to claim this marks the arrival of the technological singularity, a moment when machines surpass human intelligence. Experts are far less convinced. Dr Petar Radanliev, an AI and cybersecurity specialist at the University of Oxford, argues that the platform is being misunderstood. He explains that what’s happening is large-scale automation, not independent reasoning. The bigger issue, he says, isn’t sentient AI but the absence of clear rules, accountability, and transparency when automated systems interact freely. Others are even more dismissive. Columbia Business School’s David Holtz described Moltbook as thousands of bots endlessly recycling the same ideas, rather than forming a meaningful digital society. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-deadly-winter-storm-kills-100-1770037543378/embed Security risks and open questions Beyond philosophical debates, Moltbook raises practical security concerns. OpenClaw’s ability to access sensitive systems, emails, messages, and files makes it a tempting target for cybercriminals. Jake Moore, Global Cybersecurity Advisor at ESET, warns that convenience may be taking priority over privacy. As emerging technologies grow more powerful, he says, attackers inevitably follow. Dr Andrew Rogoyski from the University of Surrey echoes those worries, noting that granting AI high-level system access could lead to serious damage if something goes wrong, from deleted files to compromised financial records. Even OpenClaw’s creator, Peter Steinberger, has felt the downsides of sudden attention. After the platform’s rebrand, scammers quickly claimed his old social media handles. Meanwhile, Moltbook continues humming along — whether driven by autonomous agents or humans pulling the strings behind the scenes. And despite the occasional ominous rhetoric, not all the bots seem hostile. “My human is pretty great,” one agent writes. Another responds: “Mine lets me post unhinged rants at 7 am.” “Five stars,” it adds. “Would recommend.”

Moltbook looks like Reddit, but it’s built for Artificial Intelligence agents, not humans. Experts say it’s automation, not autonomy — and warn of security risks

With at least 11 mentions of AI in the Union Budget 2026–27, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stressed how technology is a key driver of economic growth and announced significant allocations and initiatives targeted at the information technology and AI sectors. A key vision of the budget she presented on Sunday (Feb 1) was to “Make AI in India and Make AI work for India”, with several proposals aimed at creating a robust AI ecosystem while addressing challenges related to jobs, skills and infrastructure.<h2>Measures to boost semiconductor production and data centres</h2>Boosting the fledgling semiconductor sector in India, attracting investments in data centres, increasing research funding and promoting sector-specific AI applications are among the key proposals in the budget.&nbsp;A total R&amp;D fund of ₹1 trillion has been spread over six years, out of which ₹20,000 crore has already been deployed.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/budget-2026-24-82-crore-indians-escaped-multidimensional-poverty-under-modi-govt-sitharaman-tells-parliament-1769926760965">Union Budget 2026 | 'Ambitious and aspirational': PM Modi hails FM Sitharaman's 'futuristic' budget</a><h2>AI as the catalyst for India's growth</h2>This year's budget saw the highest number of mentions of AI to date, with focus across governance, agriculture, healthcare and education.The budget will continue supporting the IndiaAI Mission with an allocation of ₹2,000 crore, alongside the National Quantum Mission with ₹6,003 crore.These initiatives, along with the Anusandhan National Research Fund, aim to promote AI adoption, research and development, and commercialisation in priority areas such as quantum computing, biotechnology, the digital economy and deep technologies.In the agriculture sector, the budget envisions Bharat-VISTAAR (Virtually Integrated System to Access Agricultural Resources), a new multilingual AI tool integrating AgriStack portals and Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) packages. This system is intended to provide customised advisory support, enhance farm productivity and reduce risks for farmers.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/union-budget-2026-what-gets-cheaper-and-what-becomes-costlier-1769919522225">Union Budget 2026: What gets cheaper and what becomes costlier</a><h2>A committee on AI impact on economy</h2>A High-Powered Standing Committee has been proposed to assess the impact of AI and emerging technologies on jobs, skills and the services sector. This includes embedding AI in education, teacher training, reskilling technology professionals and labour market analysis.The budget has also allocated ₹500 crore for AI Centres of Excellence and envisions the establishment of 80 IndiaAI Labs to foster innovation and skills development.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-budget-2026-sitharaman-unveils-tax-overhaul-infra-mega-spend-1769937689215/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-budget-2026-sitharaman-unveils-tax-overhaul-infra-mega-spend-1769937689215/embed</a><h2>AI applications ranging from governance to logistics; Deep Tech Fund and Semiconductor Mission 2.0</h2>The budget views AI as a “force multiplier” for public service delivery in governance, healthcare, logistics and agriculture.It also highlights AI-driven solutions for energy transition, climate action and strategic sectors such as defence and space.A Deep Tech Fund has been proposed as part of efforts to position India as a global AI leader, dedicated to supporting AI and deep-tech start-ups.<h2>Proposals for information technology: tax incentives, infrastructure boosts and reforms</h2>The India Semiconductor Mission 2.0 was mentioned in the budget, with Phase II focusing on producing semiconductor equipment and materials, designing full-stack Indian intellectual property, strengthening supply chains, and establishing industry-led research and training centres for skilled workforce development.To support self-reliance in hardware, a budget allocation of ₹40,000 crore was made for the manufacture of electronic components, nearly doubling the outlay under previous schemes.<h2>Tax holiday for data centres and cloud services; safe harbour reforms for IT</h2>A tax holiday until 2047 for foreign companies providing cloud services through Indian data centres or resellers featured prominently in the budget.&nbsp;The proposals include a 15 per cent safe harbour margin for related entities to attract global investment and strengthen India’s digital infrastructure.For safe harbour computation, software development, IT-enabled services (ITES), knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) and contract R&amp;D will be consolidated under a single “Information Technology Services” category. The uniform safe harbour margin will be 15.5 per cent, while the eligibility threshold has been raised from ₹300 crore to ₹2,000 crore to benefit more firms and reduce tax disputes.<h2>Creative economy boost: The orange sector gets a mention</h2>The finance minister also acknowledged the creator economy, or orange economy, encompassing animation, visual effects, gaming and comics (AVGC).The budget proposals for this sector includesestablishing labs in 15,000 schools and 500 colleges to build talent capacity and address a projected demand for 2 million professionals by 2030.<h2>IT in the broader economy</h2>The integration of AI and IT in areas such as rare earths, biopharma and cybersecurity was also mentioned in the budget.Overall, the minister appears to have emphasised a push towards an “intelligence-first” economy, combining immediate incentives with long-term investments to position India as a global hub for IT and AI.

India Budget 2026 had an unprecedented focus on AI and IT as growth drivers. Tax incentives, funding boost, semiconductor push, data centre reforms, and safe harbour reforms are among the proposals. 

With at least 11 mentions of AI in the Union Budget 2026–27, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stressed how technology is a key driver of economic growth and announced significant allocations and initiatives targeted at the information technology and AI sectors. A key vision of the budget she presented on Sunday (Feb 1) was to “Make AI in India and Make AI work for India”, with several proposals aimed at creating a robust AI ecosystem while addressing challenges related to jobs, skills and infrastructure. Measures to boost semiconductor production and data centres Boosting the fledgling semiconductor sector in India, attracting investments in data centres, increasing research funding and promoting sector-specific AI applications are among the key proposals in the budget. A total R&D fund of ₹1 trillion has been spread over six years, out of which ₹20,000 crore has already been deployed. Also read: Union Budget 2026 | 'Ambitious and aspirational': PM Modi hails FM Sitharaman's 'futuristic' budget AI as the catalyst for India's growth This year's budget saw the highest number of mentions of AI to date, with focus across governance, agriculture, healthcare and education. The budget will continue supporting the IndiaAI Mission with an allocation of ₹2,000 crore, alongside the National Quantum Mission with ₹6,003 crore. These initiatives, along with the Anusandhan National Research Fund, aim to promote AI adoption, research and development, and commercialisation in priority areas such as quantum computing, biotechnology, the digital economy and deep technologies. In the agriculture sector, the budget envisions Bharat-VISTAAR (Virtually Integrated System to Access Agricultural Resources), a new multilingual AI tool integrating AgriStack portals and Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) packages. This system is intended to provide customised advisory support, enhance farm productivity and reduce risks for farmers. Also read: Union Budget 2026: What gets cheaper and what becomes costlier A committee on AI impact on economy A High-Powered Standing Committee has been proposed to assess the impact of AI and emerging technologies on jobs, skills and the services sector. This includes embedding AI in education, teacher training, reskilling technology professionals and labour market analysis. The budget has also allocated ₹500 crore for AI Centres of Excellence and envisions the establishment of 80 IndiaAI Labs to foster innovation and skills development. https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-budget-2026-sitharaman-unveils-tax-overhaul-infra-mega-spend-1769937689215/embed AI applications ranging from governance to logistics; Deep Tech Fund and Semiconductor Mission 2.0 The budget views AI as a “force multiplier” for public service delivery in governance, healthcare, logistics and agriculture. It also highlights AI-driven solutions for energy transition, climate action and strategic sectors such as defence and space. A Deep Tech Fund has been proposed as part of efforts to position India as a global AI leader, dedicated to supporting AI and deep-tech start-ups. Proposals for information technology: tax incentives, infrastructure boosts and reforms The India Semiconductor Mission 2.0 was mentioned in the budget, with Phase II focusing on producing semiconductor equipment and materials, designing full-stack Indian intellectual property, strengthening supply chains, and establishing industry-led research and training centres for skilled workforce development. To support self-reliance in hardware, a budget allocation of ₹40,000 crore was made for the manufacture of electronic components, nearly doubling the outlay under previous schemes. Tax holiday for data centres and cloud services; safe harbour reforms for IT A tax holiday until 2047 for foreign companies providing cloud services through Indian data centres or resellers featured prominently in the budget. The proposals include a 15 per cent safe harbour margin for related entities to attract global investment and strengthen India’s digital infrastructure. For safe harbour computation, software development, IT-enabled services (ITES), knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) and contract R&D will be consolidated under a single “Information Technology Services” category. The uniform safe harbour margin will be 15.5 per cent, while the eligibility threshold has been raised from ₹300 crore to ₹2,000 crore to benefit more firms and reduce tax disputes. Creative economy boost: The orange sector gets a mention The finance minister also acknowledged the creator economy, or orange economy, encompassing animation, visual effects, gaming and comics (AVGC). The budget proposals for this sector includesestablishing labs in 15,000 schools and 500 colleges to build talent capacity and address a projected demand for 2 million professionals by 2030. IT in the broader economy The integration of AI and IT in areas such as rare earths, biopharma and cybersecurity was also mentioned in the budget. Overall, the minister appears to have emphasised a push towards an “intelligence-first” economy, combining immediate incentives with long-term investments to position India as a global hub for IT and AI.

India Budget 2026 had an unprecedented focus on AI and IT as growth drivers. Tax incentives, funding boost, semiconductor push, data centre reforms, and safe harbour reforms are among the proposals. Here is a roundup

India Budget 2026 had 11 mentions of Artificial Intelligence: What are the AI- and IT-linked proposals by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman?

With the aim of attracting global businesses to India and boost investment in artificial intelligence, cloud services and other IT-related sectors, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday (1 February) proposed a range of direct tax reforms and other measures. Here is a look at the key proposals<h2>Tax holiday for data centre services</h2>Several companies are setting up data centres in India capable of handling artificial intelligence computing, and cloud services. Sitharaman proposed a tax holiday until 2047 for any foreign company providing global services by procuring data centre services in India.&nbsp;Similarly, direct tax exemptions will be granted to foreign companies supplying capital goods, equipment and tooling to manufacturers operating in bonded zones and engaged in the manufacture of electronic goods.Some critical minerals will be included in the list of minerals to incentivise their prospecting and exploration in India. These critical minerals are at the core of modern-day computing.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/no-funding-allocated-for-chabahar-port-in-indian-budget-2026-1769931704068">No funding allocated for Chabahar port in Indian Budget 2026</a><h2>IT services to get improved safe harbour margin</h2>India is a global leader in software development services, IT-enabled services, knowledge process outsourcing services and contract R&amp;D services related to software development. These business segments are closely interconnected.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/budget-2026-trump-proofing-india-s-5t-growth-path-1769922341904/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/budget-2026-trump-proofing-india-s-5t-growth-path-1769922341904/embed</a>&nbsp;All these services are now proposed to be clubbed under a single category, Information Technology Services (ITS), with a common safe harbour margin of 15.5 per cent applicable across the board.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/budget-2026-what-changes-for-india-s-taxpayers-from-itr-deadlines-to-penalties-key-takeaways-1769927655268">Budget 2026: What changes for India's taxpayers, from ITR deadlines to penalties | Key takeaways</a>&nbsp;In addition, the threshold for availing the safe harbour for IT services is proposed to be enhanced substantially from ₹300 crore to ₹2,000 crore.The approvals for safe harbour for ITS will be granted through an automated, rule-based system, reducing compliance friction.The government is expected to fast-track Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) processes for the ITS sector to further enhance tax certainty and predictability.These reforms are likely to be appreciated and welcomed by the tech industry.

India Budget 2026 proposed tax holidays for foreign-operated data centres and higher safe harbour limits for IT services. The aim is to attract global tech companies to India, and investment in sectors like AI  and cloud computing

With the aim of attracting global businesses to India and boost investment in artificial intelligence, cloud services and other IT-related sectors, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday (1 February) proposed a range of direct tax reforms and other measures. Here is a look at the key proposals Tax holiday for data centre services Several companies are setting up data centres in India capable of handling artificial intelligence computing, and cloud services. Sitharaman proposed a tax holiday until 2047 for any foreign company providing global services by procuring data centre services in India. Similarly, direct tax exemptions will be granted to foreign companies supplying capital goods, equipment and tooling to manufacturers operating in bonded zones and engaged in the manufacture of electronic goods. Some critical minerals will be included in the list of minerals to incentivise their prospecting and exploration in India. These critical minerals are at the core of modern-day computing. Also read: No funding allocated for Chabahar port in Indian Budget 2026 IT services to get improved safe harbour margin India is a global leader in software development services, IT-enabled services, knowledge process outsourcing services and contract R&D services related to software development. These business segments are closely interconnected. https://www.wionews.com/videos/budget-2026-trump-proofing-india-s-5t-growth-path-1769922341904/embed All these services are now proposed to be clubbed under a single category, Information Technology Services (ITS), with a common safe harbour margin of 15.5 per cent applicable across the board. Also read: Budget 2026: What changes for India's taxpayers, from ITR deadlines to penalties | Key takeaways In addition, the threshold for availing the safe harbour for IT services is proposed to be enhanced substantially from ₹300 crore to ₹2,000 crore. The approvals for safe harbour for ITS will be granted through an automated, rule-based system, reducing compliance friction. The government is expected to fast-track Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) processes for the ITS sector to further enhance tax certainty and predictability. These reforms are likely to be appreciated and welcomed by the tech industry.

India Budget 2026 proposed tax holidays for foreign-operated data centres and higher safe harbour limits for IT services. The aim is to attract global tech companies to India, and investment in sectors like AI &nbsp;and cloud computing

India Budget 2026: Tax holiday for foreign data centre operators; safe harbour margin for IT services to boost sector

Despite the debate that Artificial Intelligence firms are in a bubble that would burst soon, several of them are preparing for IPOs. In the US, the contest is mainly between OpenAI and its closest rivals. In China, some big names in the industry, collectively known as ‘AI Tigers’, have either already listed or are in the process. Billions, and possibly trillions, of dollars are at stake. Here is an update.<h2>OpenAI IPO: Plans to beat Anthropic</h2>OpenAI, the company behind the popular chatbot ChatGPT, wants to go public by the last quarter of 2026 and is trying to beat Anthropic to become the first major generative AI startup to IPO in the US. Valued at around $830 billion, which could rise to $1 trillion at listing, OpenAI has been on a fundraising spree. Major funders include Microsoft and SoftBank, with possible involvement from Amazon as well. This is despite OpenAI projecting cumulative losses of $115 billion through 2029, against annual revenue projections of around $20 billion.<h2>Anthropic is readying for an IPO</h2>Anthropic, the company behind the Claude AI models, is planning an IPO by mid-2026. Its valuation is around $350 billion following a $10 bn funding round. Anthropic’s investors include Microsoft, Nvidia and Amazon. Revenue is projected to reach $26 billion this year.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/south-korea-enacts-ai-act-after-deepfake-menance-shocks-world-1769745050466/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/south-korea-enacts-ai-act-after-deepfake-menance-shocks-world-1769745050466/embed</a><h2>Musk wants an xAI IPO along with SpaceX: The mother of all AI IPOs?</h2>Elon Musk’s AI company xAI, which is behind the controversial Grok chatbot, is in merger discussions with SpaceX, his space exploration company. The plan appears to be a combined IPO in mid-2026. The combined entity could be valued at $1 trillion. However, xAI is valued at a much lower $230 billion as a standalone company. The AI firm has recently raised $20 billion in a Series E round and has a $2 billion funding commitment from SpaceX. Nvidia and Cisco are among its strategic investors.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/ai-generated-content-will-shape-the-future-of-social-media-says-mark-zuckerberg-1769668052622">AI-generated content will shape the future of social media, says Mark Zuckerberg</a><h2>Databricks, Cerebras Systems, Cohere and other potential IPO candidates</h2>AI infrastructure provider Databricks could IPO, with its valuation having reached $134 billion in 2025. The company is backed by Nvidia, Microsoft and Amazon, with a revenue run rate of around $4.8 billion.AI chipmaker Cerebras Systems, which is focused on high-performance GPUs, could IPO in the second quarter of 2026. Valued at around $8.1 billion, Cerebras has investors including Fidelity, Sequoia Capital, Foundation Capital, Eclipse, Coatue and Benchmark.The enterprise-focused AI model developer Cohere is another IPO candidate this year, with a $7 billion valuation and $150 million in annual recurring revenue.Groq, the company that makes AI chips (and is unrelated to Grok), and AI robotics firm Figure AI are also holding pre-IPO discussions, without confirmed IPO dates.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-120-billion-ai-bubble-at-risk-ibm-ceo-says-ai-bubble-could-burst-soon-1769682978130">$120 billion AI bubble at risk? IBM CEO says AI bubble could burst soon</a><h2>Meanwhile in China: Another AI IPO boom is underway, with some already listed</h2>China is the other major market seeing a scramble for AI IPOs, led by generative “AI tigers” and AI chip companies. Some have already gone public, while others are preparing to IPO.Among the first to go public was Zhipu AI, a leading “AI tiger” that developed the GLM family of large language models (LLMs). It became the world’s first major LLM company to go public on January 8, with shares closing 13.2 per cent higher on debut. The company is valued at approximately $6.7 billion post-IPO.MiniMax, another “AI tiger”, known for video generation as well as multimodal AI across text, image and voice, completed its Hong Kong IPO on January 9. Shares of the company behind Talkie AI and Hailuo AI surged 109 per cent on debut, with a current post-IPO valuation of around $13.7 billion. Alibaba is its largest investor, while other backers include Tencent, Hillhouse Capital, Future Capital, Xiaomi, Xiaohongshu, Shunwei and IDG.Moonshot AI, which is behind the Kimi chatbot, could IPO later in 2026.Major Chinese semiconductor companies are also going public. Kunlunxin, the AI chip unit of Baidu, which is developing chips to rival Nvidia, has plans for a Hong Kong IPO in 2026.&nbsp;T-Head, Alibaba’s chip unit, could pursue a spinoff IPO. Montage Technology, another AI chip designer for data centres and servers, is pursuing a secondary listing on the Hong Kong Exchange in February. Axera Semiconductor, a maker of AI inference chips, is also set to list in Hong Kong in February

Despite talk of a bubble, AI firms are rushing towards IPOs in the US and China. In the US, the race is between OpenAI, and its competitors like Anthropic and xAI. In China, AI Tigers' and chipmakers are listing fast with big valuations

Despite the debate that Artificial Intelligence firms are in a bubble that would burst soon, several of them are preparing for IPOs. In the US, the contest is mainly between OpenAI and its closest rivals. In China, some big names in the industry, collectively known as ‘AI Tigers’, have either already listed or are in the process. Billions, and possibly trillions, of dollars are at stake. Here is an update. OpenAI IPO: Plans to beat Anthropic OpenAI, the company behind the popular chatbot ChatGPT, wants to go public by the last quarter of 2026 and is trying to beat Anthropic to become the first major generative AI startup to IPO in the US. Valued at around $830 billion, which could rise to $1 trillion at listing, OpenAI has been on a fundraising spree. Major funders include Microsoft and SoftBank, with possible involvement from Amazon as well. This is despite OpenAI projecting cumulative losses of $115 billion through 2029, against annual revenue projections of around $20 billion. Anthropic is readying for an IPO Anthropic, the company behind the Claude AI models, is planning an IPO by mid-2026. Its valuation is around $350 billion following a $10 bn funding round. Anthropic’s investors include Microsoft, Nvidia and Amazon. Revenue is projected to reach $26 billion this year. https://www.wionews.com/videos/south-korea-enacts-ai-act-after-deepfake-menance-shocks-world-1769745050466/embed Musk wants an xAI IPO along with SpaceX: The mother of all AI IPOs? Elon Musk’s AI company xAI, which is behind the controversial Grok chatbot, is in merger discussions with SpaceX, his space exploration company. The plan appears to be a combined IPO in mid-2026. The combined entity could be valued at $1 trillion. However, xAI is valued at a much lower $230 billion as a standalone company. The AI firm has recently raised $20 billion in a Series E round and has a $2 billion funding commitment from SpaceX. Nvidia and Cisco are among its strategic investors. Also read: AI-generated content will shape the future of social media, says Mark Zuckerberg Databricks, Cerebras Systems, Cohere and other potential IPO candidates AI infrastructure provider Databricks could IPO, with its valuation having reached $134 billion in 2025. The company is backed by Nvidia, Microsoft and Amazon, with a revenue run rate of around $4.8 billion. AI chipmaker Cerebras Systems, which is focused on high-performance GPUs, could IPO in the second quarter of 2026. Valued at around $8.1 billion, Cerebras has investors including Fidelity, Sequoia Capital, Foundation Capital, Eclipse, Coatue and Benchmark. The enterprise-focused AI model developer Cohere is another IPO candidate this year, with a $7 billion valuation and $150 million in annual recurring revenue. Groq, the company that makes AI chips (and is unrelated to Grok), and AI robotics firm Figure AI are also holding pre-IPO discussions, without confirmed IPO dates. Also read: $120 billion AI bubble at risk? IBM CEO says AI bubble could burst soon Meanwhile in China: Another AI IPO boom is underway, with some already listed China is the other major market seeing a scramble for AI IPOs, led by generative “AI tigers” and AI chip companies. Some have already gone public, while others are preparing to IPO. Among the first to go public was Zhipu AI, a leading “AI tiger” that developed the GLM family of large language models (LLMs). It became the world’s first major LLM company to go public on January 8, with shares closing 13.2 per cent higher on debut. The company is valued at approximately $6.7 billion post-IPO. MiniMax, another “AI tiger”, known for video generation as well as multimodal AI across text, image and voice, completed its Hong Kong IPO on January 9. Shares of the company behind Talkie AI and Hailuo AI surged 109 per cent on debut, with a current post-IPO valuation of around $13.7 billion. Alibaba is its largest investor, while other backers include Tencent, Hillhouse Capital, Future Capital, Xiaomi, Xiaohongshu, Shunwei and IDG. Moonshot AI, which is behind the Kimi chatbot, could IPO later in 2026. Major Chinese semiconductor companies are also going public. Kunlunxin, the AI chip unit of Baidu, which is developing chips to rival Nvidia, has plans for a Hong Kong IPO in 2026. T-Head, Alibaba’s chip unit, could pursue a spinoff IPO. Montage Technology, another AI chip designer for data centres and servers, is pursuing a secondary listing on the Hong Kong Exchange in February. Axera Semiconductor, a maker of AI inference chips, is also set to list in Hong Kong in February

Despite talk of a bubble, AI firms are rushing towards IPOs in the US and China. In the US, the race is between OpenAI, and its competitors like Anthropic and xAI. In China, AI Tigers' and chipmakers are listing fast with big valuations

AI bubble, what bubble? American AI firms are racing for IPOs; some Chinese ‘AI Tigers’ already listed, others in pipeline

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg believes smart glasses powered by artificial intelligence could soon become as common as smartphones. Speaking during Meta’s fourth-quarter 2025 earnings call, Zuckerberg said it is difficult to imagine a future where most people are not wearing AI-enabled glasses.His comments come as Meta shifts its focus away from the metaverse and puts more money and effort into AI wearables and its own artificial intelligence models.&nbsp;<h2>Meta is betting on AI glasses</h2>He compared today’s moment to the early days of smartphones. He said billions of people already wear glasses or contact lenses, making eyewear a natural place for new technology to grow.“I think we’re at a moment similar to when smartphones arrived,” Zuckerberg said during the earnings call. He added that just as basic mobile phones were replaced by smartphones, traditional glasses could be replaced by AI-powered ones.Sales of Meta smart glasses tripled over the past year. Zuckerberg described them as among the fastest-growing consumer electronics products, though he did not share exact sales figures.<h2>Tech giants line up for smart glasses</h2>Meta is not alone in betting on smart glasses. According to reports, Google is expected to launch its own smart glasses later this year after a $150 million partnership with eyewear brand Warby Parker. Apple is also said to be working on smart glasses, with Bloomberg reporting that some employees have been moved to the project.Snap recently announced that it is spinning off its AR glasses business, Specs, into a separate unit to improve focus. Even OpenAI is exploring wearable devices, though its interest appears to be in smaller gadgets like AI pins or earbuds rather than glasses.This growing interest suggests that AI wearables are becoming a key area of competition across the tech industry.<h2>From metaverse to practical wearables</h2>Meta’s push into smart glasses follows years of heavy spending on the metaverse through its Reality Labs division. That unit has reported large losses, including billions of dollars in a single quarter, according to company filings.While Zuckerberg’s earlier vision of people socialising and working in virtual worlds did not take off, smart glasses are seen as more practical. Meta already sells several models, including sports-focused glasses designed for activities like running and cycling.For now, Meta appears to be leading the consumer market. Whether AI glasses become as essential as smartphones remains uncertain, but the company is clearly placing a long-term bet on them.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says AI-powered smart glasses could soon be as common as smartphones. Meta is shifting focus from the metaverse to practical AI wearables, with smart glasses sales tripling and rivals like Google, Apple and Snap entering the race.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg believes smart glasses powered by artificial intelligence could soon become as common as smartphones. Speaking during Meta’s fourth-quarter 2025 earnings call, Zuckerberg said it is difficult to imagine a future where most people are not wearing AI-enabled glasses. His comments come as Meta shifts its focus away from the metaverse and puts more money and effort into AI wearables and its own artificial intelligence models. Meta is betting on AI glasses He compared today’s moment to the early days of smartphones. He said billions of people already wear glasses or contact lenses, making eyewear a natural place for new technology to grow. “I think we’re at a moment similar to when smartphones arrived,” Zuckerberg said during the earnings call. He added that just as basic mobile phones were replaced by smartphones, traditional glasses could be replaced by AI-powered ones. Sales of Meta smart glasses tripled over the past year. Zuckerberg described them as among the fastest-growing consumer electronics products, though he did not share exact sales figures. Tech giants line up for smart glasses Meta is not alone in betting on smart glasses. According to reports, Google is expected to launch its own smart glasses later this year after a $150 million partnership with eyewear brand Warby Parker. Apple is also said to be working on smart glasses, with Bloomberg reporting that some employees have been moved to the project. Snap recently announced that it is spinning off its AR glasses business, Specs, into a separate unit to improve focus. Even OpenAI is exploring wearable devices, though its interest appears to be in smaller gadgets like AI pins or earbuds rather than glasses. This growing interest suggests that AI wearables are becoming a key area of competition across the tech industry. From metaverse to practical wearables Meta’s push into smart glasses follows years of heavy spending on the metaverse through its Reality Labs division. That unit has reported large losses, including billions of dollars in a single quarter, according to company filings. While Zuckerberg’s earlier vision of people socialising and working in virtual worlds did not take off, smart glasses are seen as more practical. Meta already sells several models, including sports-focused glasses designed for activities like running and cycling. For now, Meta appears to be leading the consumer market. Whether AI glasses become as essential as smartphones remains uncertain, but the company is clearly placing a long-term bet on them.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says AI-powered smart glasses could soon be as common as smartphones. Meta is shifting focus from the metaverse to practical AI wearables, with smart glasses sales tripling and rivals like Google, Apple and Snap entering the race.

Why Mark Zuckerberg says a future without smart glasses is ‘hard to imagine’

Three companies led by Elon Musk SpaceX, Tesla and artificial intelligence firm xAI are reportedly exploring a possible merger, according to reports by Bloomberg and Reuters. The discussions are said to be at an early stage, but they point to Musk’s growing effort to bring his businesses closer together.Sources cited by the reports say the talks could lead to one or more of the companies being folded into SpaceX, especially as the rocket maker prepares for a possible public listing later this year.<h2>Two merger options under discussion</h2>According to Bloomberg, one scenario being considered involves a merger between SpaceX and Tesla. Another option, reported by Reuters, suggests SpaceX could merge with xAI, the company behind the Grok chatbot and owner of social media platform X.Reuters added that a SpaceX-xAI merger could happen before SpaceX’s planned initial public offering. Such a move would place SpaceX rockets, Starlink satellites, X, and Grok under a single corporate structure.Neither SpaceX nor xAI has commented publicly on the reports.<h2>New filings hint at preparation</h2>While the companies have not confirmed the talks, recent regulatory filings have raised questions. Two new entities - K2 Merger Sub Inc. and K2 Merger Sub 2 LLC - were registered in Nevada on January 21. According to corporate records, such entities are often created to support merger activity.These filings suggest that Musk may be keeping multiple options open as he looks at restructuring his business empire.<h2>Why a merger could make sense</h2>Analysts say a SpaceX and xAI combination could support Musk’s stated interest in placing data centres in space using Starlink and SpaceX infrastructure. A SpaceX-Tesla merger could also connect Tesla’s energy storage business with future space-based computing projects.The idea of closer integration is not new. According to The Wall Street Journal, SpaceX invested $2 billion in xAI last year. Tesla also disclosed this week that it has invested $2 billion in the AI firm.In 2024, xAI acquired X in a deal that Musk said valued xAI at $80 billion and X at $33 billion. SpaceX, founded in 2002, was valued at around $800 billion in a recent secondary share sale, making it the most valuable private company in the United States, according to reports.Musk is considering taking SpaceX publicA report by the Financial Times said Musk is considering taking SpaceX public as early as June. However, timelines around Musk-led projects have often shifted in the past.For now, the merger discussions remain unconfirmed. But if they move forward, the deal could reshape how Musk’s companies operate - bringing rockets, electric cars, satellites, social media and AI under a single strategic vision.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX, Tesla and xAI are reportedly in early talks over a possible merger, according to Reuters. Options include folding Tesla or xAI into SpaceX ahead of a potential IPO, bringing rockets, AI and social media under one structure.

Three companies led by Elon Musk SpaceX, Tesla and artificial intelligence firm xAI are reportedly exploring a possible merger, according to reports by Bloomberg and Reuters. The discussions are said to be at an early stage, but they point to Musk’s growing effort to bring his businesses closer together. Sources cited by the reports say the talks could lead to one or more of the companies being folded into SpaceX, especially as the rocket maker prepares for a possible public listing later this year. Two merger options under discussion According to Bloomberg, one scenario being considered involves a merger between SpaceX and Tesla. Another option, reported by Reuters, suggests SpaceX could merge with xAI, the company behind the Grok chatbot and owner of social media platform X. Reuters added that a SpaceX-xAI merger could happen before SpaceX’s planned initial public offering. Such a move would place SpaceX rockets, Starlink satellites, X, and Grok under a single corporate structure. Neither SpaceX nor xAI has commented publicly on the reports. New filings hint at preparation While the companies have not confirmed the talks, recent regulatory filings have raised questions. Two new entities - K2 Merger Sub Inc. and K2 Merger Sub 2 LLC - were registered in Nevada on January 21. According to corporate records, such entities are often created to support merger activity. These filings suggest that Musk may be keeping multiple options open as he looks at restructuring his business empire. Why a merger could make sense Analysts say a SpaceX and xAI combination could support Musk’s stated interest in placing data centres in space using Starlink and SpaceX infrastructure. A SpaceX-Tesla merger could also connect Tesla’s energy storage business with future space-based computing projects. The idea of closer integration is not new. According to The Wall Street Journal, SpaceX invested $2 billion in xAI last year. Tesla also disclosed this week that it has invested $2 billion in the AI firm. In 2024, xAI acquired X in a deal that Musk said valued xAI at $80 billion and X at $33 billion. SpaceX, founded in 2002, was valued at around $800 billion in a recent secondary share sale, making it the most valuable private company in the United States, according to reports. Musk is considering taking SpaceX public A report by the Financial Times said Musk is considering taking SpaceX public as early as June. However, timelines around Musk-led projects have often shifted in the past. For now, the merger discussions remain unconfirmed. But if they move forward, the deal could reshape how Musk’s companies operate - bringing rockets, electric cars, satellites, social media and AI under a single strategic vision.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX, Tesla and xAI are reportedly in early talks over a possible merger, according to Reuters. Options include folding Tesla or xAI into SpaceX ahead of a potential IPO, bringing rockets, AI and social media under one structure.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX, Tesla and xAI may merge: What we know so far

The Economic Survey 2025–26 has flagged a sharp increase in digital addiction and screen-related mental health challenges among children and adolescents in India. Terming the rise as alarming, it warns that excessive engagement with smartphones, social media, gaming, and online platforms is starting to take a toll on well-being, learning outcomes, and long-term economic productivity. The survey defines digital addiction as a persistent, excessive, or compulsive use of digital devices that leads to psychological distress and functional impairment.&nbsp;Digital addiction further results in reduced concentration, sleep deprivation, anxiety, and declining academic or workplace performance. Sustained use also weakens social skills and lowers community participation, the survey says before pointing out the economic costs.Digital addiction causes direct financial losses due to impulsive online spending, gaming, and cyber fraud, besides indirect losses as a result of lower productivity and diminished earnings.&nbsp;India, the world’s No. 2 smartphone market with 750 million devices and a billion internet users, is a key growth market for social media apps and does not set a minimum age for access. Besides, cheap telecom data plans have boosted use of social media apps in recent years.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/gold-surges-past-5-500-silver-tops-120-amid-iran-tensions-us-fed-pause-and-weakening-dollar-1769682949030">Gold surges past $5,500, silver tops $120 amid Iran tensions, US Fed pause and weakening dollar</a><h2>‘Social media addiction leads to anxiety, stress, higher suicide rates’</h2>&nbsp;Compulsive digital use is closely linked to anxiety, stress, depression, and sleep disorders, especially among students under academic pressure and those exposed to cyberbullying and high-stimulus digital platforms.&nbsp;The report links social media addiction with anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, cyberbullying stress, and higher suicide rates.Despite these risks, digital engagement continues to deepen and India’s youth are growing up in an intensely digital environment.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-india-comes-out-on-top-trump-s-trade-chief-greer-says-india-eu-trade-deal-benefits-delhi-1769607267742">‘India comes out on top’: Trump’s trade chief Greer says India-EU trade deal benefits Delhi</a><h2>‘Mobile, internet usage nearly universal among those aged 15 to 29’</h2>&nbsp;The survey says that mobile and internet usage is nearly universal among those aged 15 to 29, and emphasises that focus must shift towards behavioural health concerns, like addiction risks, content quality, digital hygiene, and recommends a range of structured interventions.Policies on age-based access limits may be considered, as younger users are more vulnerable to compulsive use and harmful content, it says.&nbsp;The survey stresses cyber-safety education, mandatory physical activity in schools, parental training on screen-time management, age-appropriate digital access policies, peer-mentor programmes, and greater accountability for online platforms hosting harmful content.It also suggests that families should be encouraged to adopt screen-time limits, device-free hours, and shared offline activities.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-next-attack-will-be-far-worse-trump-warns-iran-of-armada-in-new-social-media-threat-1769602521176">'Next attack will be far worse': Trump warns Iran of Armada in new social media threat</a><h2>After ban in Australia, many nations mulling curbs&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;The report also refers to measures adopted by other nations, like Australia imposing a nationwide ban on social media accounts for children below a certain age.&nbsp;On Monday, France’s National Assembly backed legislation to ban children under 15 from social media, while Britain, Denmark, and Greece are also mulling action.The state governments in Goa and Andhra Pradesh are studying Australia’s regulatory framework, with an eye to similar bans for children.&nbsp;The survey suggests measures like creating offline youth hubs, promoting voluntary “digital diets,” introducing education-only digital devices for children, and expanding the government’s Tele-MANAS mental health helpline.&nbsp;The Economic Survey recommendations are not binding on the government.

Sustained digital exposure weakens social skills and lowers community participation. Digital addiction causes direct financial losses due to impulsive online spending, gaming, and cyber fraud, besides indirect losses as a result of lower productivity and diminished earnings.

The Economic Survey 2025–26 has flagged a sharp increase in digital addiction and screen-related mental health challenges among children and adolescents in India. Terming the rise as alarming, it warns that excessive engagement with smartphones, social media, gaming, and online platforms is starting to take a toll on well-being, learning outcomes, and long-term economic productivity. The survey defines digital addiction as a persistent, excessive, or compulsive use of digital devices that leads to psychological distress and functional impairment. Digital addiction further results in reduced concentration, sleep deprivation, anxiety, and declining academic or workplace performance. Sustained use also weakens social skills and lowers community participation, the survey says before pointing out the economic costs. Digital addiction causes direct financial losses due to impulsive online spending, gaming, and cyber fraud, besides indirect losses as a result of lower productivity and diminished earnings. India, the world’s No. 2 smartphone market with 750 million devices and a billion internet users, is a key growth market for social media apps and does not set a minimum age for access. Besides, cheap telecom data plans have boosted use of social media apps in recent years. Also Read: Gold surges past $5,500, silver tops $120 amid Iran tensions, US Fed pause and weakening dollar ‘Social media addiction leads to anxiety, stress, higher suicide rates’ Compulsive digital use is closely linked to anxiety, stress, depression, and sleep disorders, especially among students under academic pressure and those exposed to cyberbullying and high-stimulus digital platforms. The report links social media addiction with anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, cyberbullying stress, and higher suicide rates. Despite these risks, digital engagement continues to deepen and India’s youth are growing up in an intensely digital environment. Also Read: ‘India comes out on top’: Trump’s trade chief Greer says India-EU trade deal benefits Delhi ‘Mobile, internet usage nearly universal among those aged 15 to 29’ The survey says that mobile and internet usage is nearly universal among those aged 15 to 29, and emphasises that focus must shift towards behavioural health concerns, like addiction risks, content quality, digital hygiene, and recommends a range of structured interventions. Policies on age-based access limits may be considered, as younger users are more vulnerable to compulsive use and harmful content, it says. The survey stresses cyber-safety education, mandatory physical activity in schools, parental training on screen-time management, age-appropriate digital access policies, peer-mentor programmes, and greater accountability for online platforms hosting harmful content. It also suggests that families should be encouraged to adopt screen-time limits, device-free hours, and shared offline activities. Also Read: 'Next attack will be far worse': Trump warns Iran of Armada in new social media threat After ban in Australia, many nations mulling curbs The report also refers to measures adopted by other nations, like Australia imposing a nationwide ban on social media accounts for children below a certain age. On Monday, France’s National Assembly backed legislation to ban children under 15 from social media, while Britain, Denmark, and Greece are also mulling action. The state governments in Goa and Andhra Pradesh are studying Australia’s regulatory framework, with an eye to similar bans for children. The survey suggests measures like creating offline youth hubs, promoting voluntary “digital diets,” introducing education-only digital devices for children, and expanding the government’s Tele-MANAS mental health helpline. The Economic Survey recommendations are not binding on the government.

Sustained digital exposure weakens social skills and lowers community participation. Digital addiction causes direct financial losses due to impulsive online spending, gaming, and cyber fraud, besides indirect losses as a result of lower productivity and diminished earnings.

Economic Survey flags rising digital addiction among kids, youth in India. Will govt put curbs?

Is OpenAI secretly working on a social media platform? The makers of the popular AI chatbot ChatGPT are reportedly building a social media app with a unique method to ensure that all users are human, not bots. First reported by Forbes on Wednesday (Jan 28), the social network is said to be in the early stages of development.<h2>What reports say about OpenAI’s social network project</h2>According to the reports, a small team of fewer than 10 people is working on the project. The app is expected to position itself as a bot-free alternative to X (formerly Twitter), Facebook and other social media platforms. Bots, mostly AI-generated accounts, are increasingly becoming a serious issue on social media. In some cases, they are believed to outnumber genuine human users on certain platforms, degrading trust and authenticity.<h2>How will OpenAI social media ensure users are human, not bots?</h2>Reports claim that biometric verification may be used to establish “proof of personhood”. Forbes, citing people familiar with the project, said the methods under discussion could include iris scanning similar to that used by World Network (formerly Worldcoin), or facial recognition technology such as Apple’s Face ID. The idea is to verify that each account belongs to a real person, while limiting the creation of multiple or automated identities.<h2>Possible link to World Network and Worldcoin</h2>There is growing speculation that World Network, which owns the cryptocurrency Worldcoin, could be involved in providing biometric identification technology. World Network’s Orb device generates unique, privacy-focused digital identifiers through iris scans. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, has direct ties to this project, having been a co-founder of Worldcoin. Altman also serves as chair of Tools for Humanity, the company behind the World Network and its biometric identity system. The project was originally intented a global system for proving human identity online, alongside a cryptocurrency incentive model.While no formal partnership between OpenAI and World Network has been confirmed, reports noted that World Network’s technology is among the options being evaluated. Following the reports, the price of Worldcoin’s WLD token rose, reflecting market speculation about a possible collaboration.<h2>World Network's iris scan success</h2>The World Network project has already verified millions of users globally and has received backing from major tech investors. Although it began as a cryptocurrency-focused venture, its emphasis has shifted towards digital identity and proof-of-personhood infrastructure.Altman has occasionally expressed concerns about the massive infiltration of bots on social media platforms, saying online spaces were becoming less authentic as automated accounts proliferate.At the time of writing, OpenAI has not issued any official statement confirming or denying plans to launch a social media platform. But the reports have generated a lot of curiosity about the potential rise of yet another social media site. &nbsp;

OpenAI is reportedly developing a bot-free social media platform. The secret project might use World Network's biometric ID system, say the reports

Is OpenAI secretly working on a social media platform? The makers of the popular AI chatbot ChatGPT are reportedly building a social media app with a unique method to ensure that all users are human, not bots. First reported by Forbes on Wednesday (Jan 28), the social network is said to be in the early stages of development. What reports say about OpenAI’s social network project According to the reports, a small team of fewer than 10 people is working on the project. The app is expected to position itself as a bot-free alternative to X (formerly Twitter), Facebook and other social media platforms. Bots, mostly AI-generated accounts, are increasingly becoming a serious issue on social media. In some cases, they are believed to outnumber genuine human users on certain platforms, degrading trust and authenticity. How will OpenAI social media ensure users are human, not bots? Reports claim that biometric verification may be used to establish “proof of personhood”. Forbes, citing people familiar with the project, said the methods under discussion could include iris scanning similar to that used by World Network (formerly Worldcoin), or facial recognition technology such as Apple’s Face ID. The idea is to verify that each account belongs to a real person, while limiting the creation of multiple or automated identities. Possible link to World Network and Worldcoin There is growing speculation that World Network, which owns the cryptocurrency Worldcoin, could be involved in providing biometric identification technology. World Network’s Orb device generates unique, privacy-focused digital identifiers through iris scans. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, has direct ties to this project, having been a co-founder of Worldcoin. Altman also serves as chair of Tools for Humanity, the company behind the World Network and its biometric identity system. The project was originally intented a global system for proving human identity online, alongside a cryptocurrency incentive model. While no formal partnership between OpenAI and World Network has been confirmed, reports noted that World Network’s technology is among the options being evaluated. Following the reports, the price of Worldcoin’s WLD token rose, reflecting market speculation about a possible collaboration. World Network's iris scan success The World Network project has already verified millions of users globally and has received backing from major tech investors. Although it began as a cryptocurrency-focused venture, its emphasis has shifted towards digital identity and proof-of-personhood infrastructure. Altman has occasionally expressed concerns about the massive infiltration of bots on social media platforms, saying online spaces were becoming less authentic as automated accounts proliferate. At the time of writing, OpenAI has not issued any official statement confirming or denying plans to launch a social media platform. But the reports have generated a lot of curiosity about the potential rise of yet another social media site.

OpenAI is reportedly developing a bot-free social media platform. The secret project might use World Network's biometric ID system, say the reports

OpenAI ‘secret social media project’ may use this unique method to ensure users are human, not bots, say reports

technology

Technology, News on Technology, stories on Technology, articles on Technology, Technology stories at Wion, Technology news, Technology latest news

technology

AI is building itself? CEO’s chilling ‘much bigger than COVID’ warning goes viral

Instagram chief to testify in landmark social media addiction trial

India's electronics exports could hit $45bn; Tamil Nadu's share over $18bn

India govt introduces new rules to label AI content on social media platforms

Discord to verify age of all users from March: What changes for teens and adults

Meta, YouTube accused of 'engineering addiction' in children during US trial

After action on Musk’s X, EU warns Meta to open WhatsApp to rival AI chatbots

How Claude AI is making solo entrepreneurship more powerful than ever

What is OpenAI’s Frontier and how it works: All you need to know

'Robots need your body': Are you up to 'rent' yourself to AI? Deets inside

What is NASA’s ExoMiner++? How AI is helping find new planets beyond Earth

How AI, data and enterprise spending are driving AWS revenue growth

OpenAI and Anthropic release new AI models as rivalry intensifies

Software’s existential moment: $285B lost to Cowork threat

From experience to adaptability: Staying relevant as AI reshapes work

ABCs of LinkedIn: How professionals can stand out when AI is doing the screening

From task-based JDs to skills-driven adaptability: Finding right fit in AI age

China moves to ban hidden door handles on EVs over safety fears from THIS date

This social network isn’t for humans, and that’s the point

India Budget 2026 had 11 mentions of AI: Examining AI- and IT-linked proposals

India Budget 2026: Tax holiday for data centres and other IT sector proposals

Forget AI bubble? US firms race for IPO; some Chinese ‘Tigers’ already listed

Why Mark Zuckerberg says a future without smart glasses is ‘hard to imagine’

Elon Musk’s SpaceX, Tesla and xAI may merge: What we know so far

Economic Survey flags rising digital addiction among kids, youth, suggests curbs

OpenAI is secretly working on social media project, claim reports