A Texas Republican leader has sparked a controversy over his remarks on a 90-foot statue of lord Hanuman, known as the 'Statue of Union', in the US city. Alexander Duncan, a Republican from Texas, criticised that America is a Christian nation and should not permit 'a false statue of a false Hindu God.'&nbsp;"Why are we allowing a false statue of a false Hindu God to be here in Texas? We are a CHRISTIAN nation," Alexander Duncan wrote on X. The post was written while posting the video of the statue located at Shri Ashtalakshmi Temple in the town of Sugar Land, Texas.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Why are we allowing a false statue of a false Hindu God to be here in Texas? We are a CHRISTIAN nation!<a href="https://t.co/uAPJegLie0">pic.twitter.com/uAPJegLie0</a>&mdash; Alexander Duncan (@AlexDuncanTX) <a href="https://twitter.com/AlexDuncanTX/status/1969442156264689949?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 20, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h3>Netizens hit out at the post</h3>Soon after Duncan's post came on X, several social media users lashed out at him along with the Hindu American Foundation (HAF), calling the statement "anti-Hindu and inflammatory." Reacting to it, the Hindu group formally reported the incident to the Republican Party in Texas and urged it to address the matter.&nbsp;"Hello @TexasGOP, will you be disciplining your senate candidate from your party who openly contravenes your own guidelines against discrimination-displaying some pretty sordid anti-Hindu hate-not to mention disrespect for the 1st Amendment's Establishment Clause?" the Hindu American Foundation posted.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Hello <a href="https://twitter.com/TexasGOP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TexasGOP</a>, will you be disciplining your senate candidate from your party who openly contravenes your own guidelines against discrimination—displaying some pretty sordid anti-Hindu hate—not to mention disrespect for the 1st Amendment’s Establishment Clause? <a href="https://t.co/5LItlu7Zu2">https://t.co/5LItlu7Zu2</a> <a href="https://t.co/oqZkZozUBR">pic.twitter.com/oqZkZozUBR</a>&mdash; Hindu American Foundation (@HinduAmerican) <a href="https://twitter.com/HinduAmerican/status/1970133747543740422?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In response to his remarks, several netizens criticised on social media. An X user wrote, " Hindus aren't promoting j*had. Focus on the actual problem of violent foreign nationals who h8 us. Hindu gods depict facets of the ultimate god consciousness. They are all connected and promote the development of virtue. Read up a bit. This is not the problem."&nbsp;Another X user said, "Just because you’re not Hindu, doesn’t make it false. The Vedas were written almost 2000 years before Jesus walked the earth and are extraordinary texts. And there’s obvious influences on Christianity…so it would be wise to honor and research the ‘religion’ that predates and influences yours."&nbsp;"India has always been a Hindu civilisation. Yet today it houses over 500,000 mosques &amp; nearly 100,000 churches/ chapels, with the Catholic Church standing as the second-largest landowner after the Indian government (not some Indic faith). Despite deep theological differences, no Indian politician would dare call these churches an “abomination” or dismiss them as shrines to “fake gods.” Yet you bigots spit such venom freely and walk away unscathed. Perhaps you do deserve the fate hurtling your way where you will be swallowed by the toxic cocktail of Wokeism and Pan-Islamism," another user said.

Alexander Duncan, a Republican from Texas, criticised that America is a Christian nation and should not permit 'a false statue of a false Hindu God.' Reacting to it, the Hindu group formally reported the incident to the Republican Party in Texas and urged it to address the matter.

A Texas Republican leader has sparked a controversy over his remarks on a 90-foot statue of lord Hanuman, known as the 'Statue of Union', in the US city. Alexander Duncan, a Republican from Texas, criticised that America is a Christian nation and should not permit 'a false statue of a false Hindu God.' "Why are we allowing a false statue of a false Hindu God to be here in Texas? We are a CHRISTIAN nation," Alexander Duncan wrote on X. The post was written while posting the video of the statue located at Shri Ashtalakshmi Temple in the town of Sugar Land, Texas.

Alexander Duncan, a Republican from Texas, criticised that America is a Christian nation and should not permit 'a false statue of a false Hindu God.' Reacting to it, the Hindu group formally reported the incident to the Republican Party in Texas and urged it to address the matter.

'False statue of a false Hindu God': Alexander Duncan's remark on Hanuman idol in Texas triggers backlash

An earthquake of 4.3 magnitude hit the San Francisco region of the US in the early hours of Monday. Tremors were felt across the Bay Area, where several people were reportedly shaken. The earthquake jolted at a depth of 7.8 kilometres around 2:56 am, centred in Berkeley, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS).&nbsp;Initial reports suggested that a minor earthquake of 2.4 magnitude also struck near Petrolia, California, at around 12:50 a.m. However, no injuries or major damage have been reported so far from these quakes.&nbsp;Meanwhile, residents across the region said they felt the tremors, with many posting on social media about their homes shaking. Several also received alerts from the US Geological Survey’s (USGS) shake notification system as the quake hit.

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) confirmed that tremors were felt across the Bay Area, where several people were reportedly shaken. The earthquake jolted at a depth of 7.8 kilometers around 2:56 am, centred in Berkeley.

An earthquake of 4.3 magnitude hit the San Francisco region of the US in the early hours of Monday. Tremors were felt across the Bay Area, where several people were reportedly shaken. The earthquake jolted at a depth of 7.8 kilometres around 2:56 am, centred in Berkeley, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS). Initial reports suggested that a minor earthquake of 2.4 magnitude also struck near Petrolia, California, at around 12:50 a.m. However, no injuries or major damage have been reported so far from these quakes. Meanwhile, residents across the region said they felt the tremors, with many posting on social media about their homes shaking. Several also received alerts from the US Geological Survey’s (USGS) shake notification system as the quake hit.

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) confirmed that tremors were felt across the Bay Area, where several people were reportedly shaken. The earthquake jolted at a depth of 7.8 kilometres around 2:56 am, centred in Berkeley.

An earthquake of 4.3 magnitude centered in Berkeley jolts US Bay Area

Robinson walked into the Washington County Sheriff’s office with his parents the day after the killing. Sheriff Nate Brooksby said he appeared quiet and sombre during the surrender.

Tyler Robinson, 22, accused of assassinating conservative activist Charlie Kirk, was reportedly “fearful” of being killed by police before turning himself in.

Charlie Kirk's shooter Tyler Robinson 'feared' being shot by police before surrender

US President Donald Trump has listed India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Burma and China among 23 nations identified as "major drug transit or major illicit drug producing" countries. In a Presidential Determination submitted to Congress, Trump warned that these countries, by producing or enabling the movement of illegal narcotics and precursor chemicals, posed a threat to the safety of the US and its citizens.&nbsp;The list of all 23 countries includes Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Burma, China, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, India, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru and Venezuela.&nbsp;The White House explained that the "Major’s List" flags those countries that serve as key sources or transit points for drugs entering the US. The State Department noted that the designation applies not only to producers but also to nations used as trafficking routes.&nbsp;Five countries, Afghanistan, Bolivia, Burma, Colombia and Venezuela, were further criticised for "failing demonstrably" to make significant efforts to combat narcotics production and trafficking, according to a report in Indian Today.<h3>Geographic and economic conditions make drug production possible</h3>The US State Department pointed out that geographic and economic conditions make drug production or transit possible, and inclusion on the list does not necessarily represent a lack of cooperation by governments. "The listing is based on the combination of geographic, commercial, and economic factors that allow drugs or precursor chemicals to be transited or produced, even if a government has engaged in robust and diligent narcotics control and law enforcement measures," the statement said.&nbsp;Donald Trump hit out at China, labelling it the "world’s largest source" of precursor chemicals used in fentanyl production. "The country’s role as the world's largest source of precursor chemicals fuelling illicit fentanyl production has been well documented," Trump said in a statement.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The list of all 23 countries includes Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Burma, China, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, India, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru and Venezuela.

US President Donald Trump has listed India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Burma and China among 23 nations identified as "major drug transit or major illicit drug producing" countries. In a Presidential Determination submitted to Congress, Trump warned that these countries, by producing or enabling the movement of illegal narcotics and precursor chemicals, posed a threat to the safety of the US and its citizens. The list of all 23 countries includes Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Burma, China, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, India, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru and Venezuela. The White House explained that the "Major’s List" flags those countries that serve as key sources or transit points for drugs entering the US. The State Department noted that the designation applies not only to producers but also to nations used as trafficking routes. Five countries, Afghanistan, Bolivia, Burma, Colombia and Venezuela, were further criticised for "failing demonstrably" to make significant efforts to combat narcotics production and trafficking, according to a report in Indian Today. Geographic and economic conditions make drug production possible The US State Department pointed out that geographic and economic conditions make drug production or transit possible, and inclusion on the list does not necessarily represent a lack of cooperation by governments. "The listing is based on the combination of geographic, commercial, and economic factors that allow drugs or precursor chemicals to be transited or produced, even if a government has engaged in robust and diligent narcotics control and law enforcement measures," the statement said. Donald Trump hit out at China, labelling it the "world’s largest source" of precursor chemicals used in fentanyl production. "The country’s role as the world's largest source of precursor chemicals fuelling illicit fentanyl production has been well documented," Trump said in a statement.

The list of all 23 countries includes Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Burma, China, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, India, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru and Venezuela.

Is India fueling 'global drug' trade? Trump lists India, Pakistan among 23 ‘major drug-producing' nations

The US Federal Reserve decided to reduce interest rates for the first time in 2025 on Wednesday (September 17), responding to signs of a cooling job market and potential risks to employment. The rate cut, set at 25 basis points, brings the benchmark lending rate to a range between 4.0% and 4.25%, with the central bank signaling two additional cuts before the end of the year.&nbsp;The vote was split, with the only dissent coming from newly appointed Fed Governor Stephen Miran. Miran, who previously served as an economic adviser to President Donald Trump, pushed for a larger reduction of 50 basis points. The other members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted in favor of the smaller cut. This meeting marked Miran’s first decision as a voting member, following his swift Senate confirmation earlier in the week. His appointment was notable, as he was named to replace another official who retired early, with many observers highlighting the political implications of his role.&nbsp;The Fed's decision reflects the difficult balancing act policymakers face: supporting the labor market while managing inflation risks. Although inflation remains above the central bank's 2% target, the economic indicators point to a deceleration in job growth, prompting the Fed to prioritize employment concerns.&nbsp;In its statement, the Fed acknowledged that risks to the labor market had increased, noting a slowdown in job creation and a slight uptick in the unemployment rate, though it still remains low. Despite inflationary pressures, the central bank emphasized the importance of boosting the economy and providing more support for the workforce.&nbsp;Additionally, the Fed raised its 2025 economic growth projection from 1.4% to 1.6%, but made no revisions to its inflation or unemployment forecasts. The move comes amid continuing political pressure, particularly from President Trump, who has consistently urged the Fed to cut rates further to stimulate the economy. The political influence on the Fed has drawn criticism, especially with Miran’s proximity to the Trump administration. Miran’s appointment, along with the ongoing legal dispute surrounding the ousting of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, has raised concerns among some economists about the Fed’s independence.&nbsp;EY’s chief economist, Gregory Daco, warned that the growing political attention on the Fed could have negative consequences. Historical precedents suggest that central banks under political influence can lead to suboptimal economic outcomes, including higher inflation, slower growth, and greater market volatility. Looking ahead, the Fed’s upcoming decisions will likely be closely scrutinized, as will Miran’s future votes and statements. The central bank faces an increasingly complex economic environment, with the full effects of Trump’s tariffs still unfolding.

US Fed announces first rate cut in nine months amid slower job growth and economic uncertainty 

The US Federal Reserve decided to reduce interest rates for the first time in 2025 on Wednesday (September 17), responding to signs of a cooling job market and potential risks to employment. The rate cut, set at 25 basis points, brings the benchmark lending rate to a range between 4.0% and 4.25%, with the central bank signaling two additional cuts before the end of the year. The vote was split, with the only dissent coming from newly appointed Fed Governor Stephen Miran. Miran, who previously served as an economic adviser to President Donald Trump, pushed for a larger reduction of 50 basis points. The other members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted in favor of the smaller cut. This meeting marked Miran’s first decision as a voting member, following his swift Senate confirmation earlier in the week. His appointment was notable, as he was named to replace another official who retired early, with many observers highlighting the political implications of his role. The Fed's decision reflects the difficult balancing act policymakers face: supporting the labor market while managing inflation risks. Although inflation remains above the central bank's 2% target, the economic indicators point to a deceleration in job growth, prompting the Fed to prioritize employment concerns. In its statement, the Fed acknowledged that risks to the labor market had increased, noting a slowdown in job creation and a slight uptick in the unemployment rate, though it still remains low. Despite inflationary pressures, the central bank emphasized the importance of boosting the economy and providing more support for the workforce. Additionally, the Fed raised its 2025 economic growth projection from 1.4% to 1.6%, but made no revisions to its inflation or unemployment forecasts. The move comes amid continuing political pressure, particularly from President Trump, who has consistently urged the Fed to cut rates further to stimulate the economy. The political influence on the Fed has drawn criticism, especially with Miran’s proximity to the Trump administration. Miran’s appointment, along with the ongoing legal dispute surrounding the ousting of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, has raised concerns among some economists about the Fed’s independence. EY’s chief economist, Gregory Daco, warned that the growing political attention on the Fed could have negative consequences. Historical precedents suggest that central banks under political influence can lead to suboptimal economic outcomes, including higher inflation, slower growth, and greater market volatility. Looking ahead, the Fed’s upcoming decisions will likely be closely scrutinized, as will Miran’s future votes and statements. The central bank faces an increasingly complex economic environment, with the full effects of Trump’s tariffs still unfolding.

The Fed cut interest rates by 25 basis points, citing slower job growth and employment risks. New Governor Stephen Miran dissented, pushing for a larger cut

US Fed announces first rate cut in nine months amid slower job growth and economic uncertainty

Hurricane Erin, of Category 2 with winds of 105 mph, is nearing its closest point to the United States after spending 10 days swirling across the Atlantic. Its massive cloud system now extends a distance of more than 1,000 miles from the Bahamas to southern New England, according to a report in The Washington Post.&nbsp;On Wednesday, a state emergency and evacuations were ordered in Outer Banks, North Carolina, before the Hurricane slated to make landfall on the East Coast. The island is likely to be hit with a storm of 20 feet or more, and New York City, with other nearby areas, are also under threat, according to a report by Associated Press.&nbsp;Previous updates highlighted that the outer bands of Hurricane Erin began to move toward the North Carolina coast. In response, Governor Josh Stein said that around 200 National Guard troops and rescue teams have been stationed to tackle the aftermath of the hurricane.&nbsp;The hurricane is likely to impact the Outer Banks and other areas on Thursday, but direct landfall will not be on the US mainland. Following the updates, officials on Thursday issued a warning against the storm, which could bring coastal flooding, especially along the Outer Banks. Due to this storm, tides are likely to cut off villages and vacation homes.&nbsp;Swimming at the beaches of New York City was also shut down through Thursday, and restrictions were enforced in several places which including New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland. Meanwhile, forecasters predicted that Nantucket Island may face 10-foot waves later this week, but a serious threat hovers in North Carolina.<h3>What is the category of the tropical storm?</h3>As per National Hurricane Center (NHC) in Miami, Erin was classified as a Category 2 hurricane as of Wednesday with maximum sustained winds of 110 mph. The storm’s center was located about 215 miles south-southeast of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, and 485 miles west of Bermuda, moving north at 16 mph.&nbsp;Ahead of the impact, North Carolina Governor Josh Stein announced a state of emergency. “When there is flooding, there is a great risk of death, and what we don't want is for people to die,” Stein said during a briefing.&nbsp;Hurricane Erin exploded to a Category 5 hurricane last Saturday, before losing strength. By Wednesday, it had weakened to Category 2—just below the threshold for a major hurricane, which is Category 3 with sustained winds of 111 mph or more.

Hurricane Erin is likely to impact the Outer Banks and other areas of the state on Thursday, but direct landfall will not be on the US mainland. In addition, officials warned against the storm, which could bring coastal flooding, especially along the Outer Banks.

Hurricane Erin, of Category 2 with winds of 105 mph, is nearing its closest point to the United States after spending 10 days swirling across the Atlantic. Its massive cloud system now extends a distance of more than 1,000 miles from the Bahamas to southern New England, according to a report in The Washington Post. On Wednesday, a state emergency and evacuations were ordered in Outer Banks, North Carolina, before the Hurricane slated to make landfall on the East Coast. The island is likely to be hit with a storm of 20 feet or more, and New York City, with other nearby areas, are also under threat, according to a report by Associated Press. Previous updates highlighted that the outer bands of Hurricane Erin began to move toward the North Carolina coast. In response, Governor Josh Stein said that around 200 National Guard troops and rescue teams have been stationed to tackle the aftermath of the hurricane. The hurricane is likely to impact the Outer Banks and other areas on Thursday, but direct landfall will not be on the US mainland. Following the updates, officials on Thursday issued a warning against the storm, which could bring coastal flooding, especially along the Outer Banks. Due to this storm, tides are likely to cut off villages and vacation homes. Swimming at the beaches of New York City was also shut down through Thursday, and restrictions were enforced in several places which including New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland. Meanwhile, forecasters predicted that Nantucket Island may face 10-foot waves later this week, but a serious threat hovers in North Carolina. What is the category of the tropical storm? As per National Hurricane Center (NHC) in Miami, Erin was classified as a Category 2 hurricane as of Wednesday with maximum sustained winds of 110 mph. The storm’s center was located about 215 miles south-southeast of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, and 485 miles west of Bermuda, moving north at 16 mph. Ahead of the impact, North Carolina Governor Josh Stein announced a state of emergency. “When there is flooding, there is a great risk of death, and what we don't want is for people to die,” Stein said during a briefing. Hurricane Erin exploded to a Category 5 hurricane last Saturday, before losing strength. By Wednesday, it had weakened to Category 2—just below the threshold for a major hurricane, which is Category 3 with sustained winds of 111 mph or more.

Hurricane Erin is likely to impact the Outer Banks and other areas of the state on Thursday, but direct landfall will not be on the US mainland. In addition, officials warned against the storm, which could bring coastal flooding, especially along the Outer Banks.

Where is Hurricane Erin now? Category 2 storm threatens outer banks with coastal flooding in US' Carolina

The US Federal Reserve has announced it will shut down its dedicated program for overseeing banks’ involvement in cryptocurrencies and financial technology, folding the work into its broader supervisory framework. The decision marks a significant shift in how America’s top banking regulator approaches emerging technologies.&nbsp;According to Reuters, the Fed confirmed on Friday that it will end its “novel activities supervision program,” which was set up in 2023 to specifically monitor how banks engage with crypto firms, blockchain projects and other fintech ventures. At the time, regulators were concerned about gaps in oversight as digital assets and new financial platforms moved deeper into the mainstream banking system.<h2>From experiment to integration</h2>The Fed said the program has now served its purpose. Over the past two years, central bank examiners have gained experience in assessing risks tied to digital assets, distributed ledger technologies, and bank partnerships with fintechs. That knowledge will now be absorbed into routine bank supervision, rather than sitting in a standalone unit.&nbsp;“The Federal Reserve has strengthened its understanding of these risks and how banks manage them,” the central bank said in its announcement, as quoted by Reuters. The move reflects growing confidence that crypto and fintech exposures can be handled within the Fed’s existing supervisory framework, rather than requiring a siloed structure.<h2>Regulatory backdrop</h2>The novel activities program was launched at a time of turmoil in crypto markets. The collapse of major firms in 2022 and 2023, including FTX, triggered a wave of scrutiny in Washington and prompted regulators to tighten their guard. Banks were warned repeatedly that their crypto dealings would be subject to higher review.&nbsp;In parallel, other regulators such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) also began highlighting the risks of digital assets to traditional finance. By scrapping the dedicated program, the Fed is signalling that crypto and fintech oversight is maturing into the normal course of supervision, rather than remaining an outlier.<h2>Industry and policy implications</h2>For banks, the decision could streamline compliance, since crypto activities will now be examined alongside their other business lines. For policymakers, it highlights a shift from experimental oversight to mainstream integration, suggesting that digital finance is no longer treated as a novelty, but as part of the broader banking landscape.&nbsp;Still, the move comes at a delicate moment. President Donald Trump’s administration has leaned toward a lighter regulatory stance on crypto, while Democrats in Congress continue to call for stricter guardrails. Analysts told Reuters that how the Fed embeds its crypto expertise into traditional oversight will be closely watched by markets and lawmakers alike.&nbsp;With the program gone, the Fed’s next challenge will be balancing innovation with financial stability, ensuring banks can explore fintech partnerships and blockchain solutions without exposing the wider system to untested risks.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

The program, started in 2023 amid concerns about oversight gaps, has fulfilled its purpose as examiners have gained knowledge on risks associated with digital assets. 

The US Federal Reserve has announced it will shut down its dedicated program for overseeing banks’ involvement in cryptocurrencies and financial technology, folding the work into its broader supervisory framework. The decision marks a significant shift in how America’s top banking regulator approaches emerging technologies. According to Reuters, the Fed confirmed on Friday that it will end its “novel activities supervision program,” which was set up in 2023 to specifically monitor how banks engage with crypto firms, blockchain projects and other fintech ventures. At the time, regulators were concerned about gaps in oversight as digital assets and new financial platforms moved deeper into the mainstream banking system. From experiment to integration The Fed said the program has now served its purpose. Over the past two years, central bank examiners have gained experience in assessing risks tied to digital assets, distributed ledger technologies, and bank partnerships with fintechs. That knowledge will now be absorbed into routine bank supervision, rather than sitting in a standalone unit. “The Federal Reserve has strengthened its understanding of these risks and how banks manage them,” the central bank said in its announcement, as quoted by Reuters. The move reflects growing confidence that crypto and fintech exposures can be handled within the Fed’s existing supervisory framework, rather than requiring a siloed structure. Regulatory backdrop The novel activities program was launched at a time of turmoil in crypto markets. The collapse of major firms in 2022 and 2023, including FTX, triggered a wave of scrutiny in Washington and prompted regulators to tighten their guard. Banks were warned repeatedly that their crypto dealings would be subject to higher review. In parallel, other regulators such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) also began highlighting the risks of digital assets to traditional finance. By scrapping the dedicated program, the Fed is signalling that crypto and fintech oversight is maturing into the normal course of supervision, rather than remaining an outlier. Industry and policy implications For banks, the decision could streamline compliance, since crypto activities will now be examined alongside their other business lines. For policymakers, it highlights a shift from experimental oversight to mainstream integration, suggesting that digital finance is no longer treated as a novelty, but as part of the broader banking landscape. Still, the move comes at a delicate moment. President Donald Trump’s administration has leaned toward a lighter regulatory stance on crypto, while Democrats in Congress continue to call for stricter guardrails. Analysts told Reuters that how the Fed embeds its crypto expertise into traditional oversight will be closely watched by markets and lawmakers alike. With the program gone, the Fed’s next challenge will be balancing innovation with financial stability, ensuring banks can explore fintech partnerships and blockchain solutions without exposing the wider system to untested risks. (With inputs from the agencies)

The US Federal Reserve will end its dedicated program overseeing banks' involvement in cryptocurrencies and fintech, integrating these responsibilities into its broader supervisory framework.

Why did the Fed scrap the dedicated crypto oversight unit?

US manufacturing production stalled in July, underscoring the strain tariffs and higher costs are placing on American factories. Data released by the Federal Reserve on August 15 showed factory output was unchanged from June, when it had risen by an upwardly revised 0.3 per cent. Economists had expected a slight decline of 0.1 per cent. Overall industrial production—which includes manufacturing, mining and utilities—slipped 0.1 per cent in July after a 0.4 per cent gain in June. On a year-over-year (y-o-y) basis, industrial output rose 1.4 per cent.<h2>Manufacturing holds flat, vehicles lag</h2>Manufacturing, which makes up about 10 per cent of the US economy, saw a mixed performance across sectors. Motor vehicle and parts production fell 0.3 per cent in July following a 2.5 per cent decline in June, reflecting both seasonal shutdowns for retooling and the added pressure of tariffs. Excluding autos, factory output edged down 0.1 per cent.While durable goods manufacturing rose 0.3 per cent on gains in aerospace, electrical equipment, appliances and furniture, nondurable output decreased 0.4 per cent, with declines across textiles, apparel and petroleum products. Primary metals and machinery production also contracted. Mining output dropped 0.4 per cent, while utilities slipped 0.2 per cent after a sharp 1.8 per cent surge the previous month.<h2>Tariffs add to headwinds</h2>Economists point to tariffs on imported inputs, including steel, aluminium and motor vehicle parts, as a key drag on production. US President Donald Trump has imposed duties of up to 50 per cent on industrial metals and 25 per cent on autos, moves he argues will restore American industrial strength. But analysts warn the measures are squeezing businesses instead.&nbsp;Goldman Sachs estimates that so far companies have absorbed most of the tariff-related costs, passing on only about 22 per cent to consumers. However, the bank expects firms to shift more of the burden to households in the coming months.<h2>Capacity use declines</h2>The Fed’s report also showed capacity utilisation, a measure of how fully firms are using available resources, eased to 77.5 per cent in July from 77.7 per cent the prior month. Manufacturing utilisation edged down to 76.8 per cent, both below long-run averages.Despite weak factory output, US retail sales rose solidly in July, suggesting resilient consumer demand could offer some support in the months ahead. Still, with manufacturing job losses accumulating since April and key industry surveys signalling contraction, economists caution the outlook for the industrial sector remains fragile.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

Economists point to tariffs on imported inputs, including steel, aluminium and motor vehicle parts, as a key drag on production. Trump has imposed duties of up to 50 per cent on industrial metals and 25 per cent on autos, moves he argues will restore American industrial strength. 

US manufacturing production stalled in July, underscoring the strain tariffs and higher costs are placing on American factories. Data released by the Federal Reserve on August 15 showed factory output was unchanged from June, when it had risen by an upwardly revised 0.3 per cent. Economists had expected a slight decline of 0.1 per cent. Overall industrial production—which includes manufacturing, mining and utilities—slipped 0.1 per cent in July after a 0.4 per cent gain in June. On a year-over-year (y-o-y) basis, industrial output rose 1.4 per cent. Manufacturing holds flat, vehicles lag Manufacturing, which makes up about 10 per cent of the US economy, saw a mixed performance across sectors. Motor vehicle and parts production fell 0.3 per cent in July following a 2.5 per cent decline in June, reflecting both seasonal shutdowns for retooling and the added pressure of tariffs. Excluding autos, factory output edged down 0.1 per cent. While durable goods manufacturing rose 0.3 per cent on gains in aerospace, electrical equipment, appliances and furniture, nondurable output decreased 0.4 per cent, with declines across textiles, apparel and petroleum products. Primary metals and machinery production also contracted. Mining output dropped 0.4 per cent, while utilities slipped 0.2 per cent after a sharp 1.8 per cent surge the previous month. Tariffs add to headwinds Economists point to tariffs on imported inputs, including steel, aluminium and motor vehicle parts, as a key drag on production. US President Donald Trump has imposed duties of up to 50 per cent on industrial metals and 25 per cent on autos, moves he argues will restore American industrial strength. But analysts warn the measures are squeezing businesses instead. Goldman Sachs estimates that so far companies have absorbed most of the tariff-related costs, passing on only about 22 per cent to consumers. However, the bank expects firms to shift more of the burden to households in the coming months. Capacity use declines The Fed’s report also showed capacity utilisation, a measure of how fully firms are using available resources, eased to 77.5 per cent in July from 77.7 per cent the prior month. Manufacturing utilisation edged down to 76.8 per cent, both below long-run averages. Despite weak factory output, US retail sales rose solidly in July, suggesting resilient consumer demand could offer some support in the months ahead. Still, with manufacturing job losses accumulating since April and key industry surveys signalling contraction, economists caution the outlook for the industrial sector remains fragile. (With inputs from agencies)

Economists point to tariffs on imported inputs, including steel, aluminium and motor vehicle parts, as a key drag on production. Trump has imposed duties of up to 50 per cent on industrial metals and 25 per cent on autos, moves he argues will restore American industrial strength.&nbsp;

US factory output stalls in July amid tariff pressures

Before leaving for Alaska to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump on Friday responded to a query on whether his country will provide a security guarantee to Ukraine if Moscow agrees to a peace deal. He sounded non-committal, saying no security will be provided in the form of NATO.&nbsp;"Not in the form of NATO because that's not going to, you know, there are certain things that aren't going to happen," he said.&nbsp;He, however, said that security guarantees are a possibility, with help from Europe. He, however, didn't elaborate further.&nbsp;Donald Trump further said that territorial swaps will also be discussed in the meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. However, he said Ukraine would make a decision in this regard ultimately.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-putin-meet-ukraine-trump-says-there-will-be-no-decisions-on-ukraine-s-territory-without-ukraine-ahead-of-meeting-with-putin-1755264006195">Also read: 'Putin wanted all of Ukraine': Trump says there will be NO decisions on Ukraine's territory without Ukraine ahead of meeting with Putin</a>&nbsp;Donald Trump further said he would not meet with Putin to negotiate on behalf of Ukraine. He Putin would have taken the entire Ukraine if Trump wasn't the President.&nbsp;Putin will arrive in a Western bloc country for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.&nbsp;Trump had said earlier this week that there would be a 25 per cent chance that the meeting wouldn't be successful.&nbsp;Zelensky told Trump and European leaders in a call on Tuesday that they should be prepared to impose sanctions on Moscow if Putin doesn't agree to an immediate ceasefire.&nbsp;Trump said he is meeting Putin to get Russia and Ukraine "at the table".&nbsp;Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, however, said that Moscow wouldn't forecast the outcome of the Trump-Putin meeting.&nbsp;Zelensky had told Trump and the European leaders that Putin isn't interested in peace.

Before leaving for Alaska to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump on Friday responded to a query on whether his country will provide a security guarantee to Ukraine if Moscow agrees to a peace deal. 

Before leaving for Alaska to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump on Friday responded to a query on whether his country will provide a security guarantee to Ukraine if Moscow agrees to a peace deal. He sounded non-committal, saying no security will be provided in the form of NATO. "Not in the form of NATO because that's not going to, you know, there are certain things that aren't going to happen," he said. He, however, said that security guarantees are a possibility, with help from Europe. He, however, didn't elaborate further. Donald Trump further said that territorial swaps will also be discussed in the meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. However, he said Ukraine would make a decision in this regard ultimately. Also read: 'Putin wanted all of Ukraine': Trump says there will be NO decisions on Ukraine's territory without Ukraine ahead of meeting with Putin Donald Trump further said he would not meet with Putin to negotiate on behalf of Ukraine. He Putin would have taken the entire Ukraine if Trump wasn't the President. Putin will arrive in a Western bloc country for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Trump had said earlier this week that there would be a 25 per cent chance that the meeting wouldn't be successful. Zelensky told Trump and European leaders in a call on Tuesday that they should be prepared to impose sanctions on Moscow if Putin doesn't agree to an immediate ceasefire. Trump said he is meeting Putin to get Russia and Ukraine "at the table". Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, however, said that Moscow wouldn't forecast the outcome of the Trump-Putin meeting. Zelensky had told Trump and the European leaders that Putin isn't interested in peace.

Trump will meet Putin on his plane at a US military base in Alaska.

Will the US give Ukraine security guarantees? Donald Trump's 'NATO' reply

The Trump administration expects to shed roughly 300,000 federal civilian jobs this year, a move that would shrink the workforce by 12.5 per cent since January, according to newly appointed Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director Scott Kupor. Speaking in Washington on August 14, Kupor said the majority of the cuts, about 80 per cent, would come from voluntary departures, while the remaining 20 per cent would be terminations. If realised, the reduction would nearly double the 154,000 employees who accepted buyouts last month, as first reported by Reuters. Kupor’s projection also represents more than a twofold increase over the 5.9 per cent attrition rate recorded in fiscal year 2023, the latest figure compiled by the non-profit Partnership for Public Service.<h2>Push for ‘government efficiency’</h2>US President Donald Trump, who began his second term in January, has made reducing the size of the federal workforce a central priority, arguing that the 2.4 million-member civilian staff is “bloated and inefficient”. Kupor stressed that he cannot compel agency heads to lay off workers but will seek to persuade cabinet secretaries to adopt his vision of streamlining government operations. “I cannot force people to lay people off,” Kupor said, emphasising the need for buy-in from agency leadership to achieve the administration’s efficiency goals. His remarks stand in contrast to the early months of Trump’s second term, when OPM leadership reportedly instructed agencies to dismiss employees who were new to their roles, according to a recent court filing.<h2>More cuts under consideration</h2>While Kupor declined to release agency-by-agency headcount targets, he confirmed that OPM will publish the figures later. In the meantime, federal agencies are preparing proposals for further workforce reductions, which will be submitted to White House Budget Director Russ Vought. These plans will be factored into the president’s upcoming budget request to Congress. Kupor met with budget officials on Wednesday to discuss the process.The scale of the anticipated cuts could have wide-reaching effects on public services and operations, though the administration maintains they are necessary for long-term fiscal sustainability. Trump’s downsizing push has drawn criticism from some employee unions and policy advocates, who warn that the reductions could weaken federal capacity in areas ranging from regulatory oversight to public health. Still, Kupor framed the changes as a strategic reset rather than an indiscriminate slashing of jobs. “We want to build a government that works smarter, not bigger,” he said.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

OPM Director Scott Kupor declined to release agency-by-agency headcount targets, but he confirmed that OPM will publish the figures later. In the meantime, federal agencies are preparing proposals for further workforce reductions, which will be submitted to White House Budget Director.

The Trump administration expects to shed roughly 300,000 federal civilian jobs this year, a move that would shrink the workforce by 12.5 per cent since January, according to newly appointed Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director Scott Kupor. Speaking in Washington on August 14, Kupor said the majority of the cuts, about 80 per cent, would come from voluntary departures, while the remaining 20 per cent would be terminations. If realised, the reduction would nearly double the 154,000 employees who accepted buyouts last month, as first reported by Reuters. Kupor’s projection also represents more than a twofold increase over the 5.9 per cent attrition rate recorded in fiscal year 2023, the latest figure compiled by the non-profit Partnership for Public Service. Push for ‘government efficiency’ US President Donald Trump, who began his second term in January, has made reducing the size of the federal workforce a central priority, arguing that the 2.4 million-member civilian staff is “bloated and inefficient”. Kupor stressed that he cannot compel agency heads to lay off workers but will seek to persuade cabinet secretaries to adopt his vision of streamlining government operations. “I cannot force people to lay people off,” Kupor said, emphasising the need for buy-in from agency leadership to achieve the administration’s efficiency goals. His remarks stand in contrast to the early months of Trump’s second term, when OPM leadership reportedly instructed agencies to dismiss employees who were new to their roles, according to a recent court filing. More cuts under consideration While Kupor declined to release agency-by-agency headcount targets, he confirmed that OPM will publish the figures later. In the meantime, federal agencies are preparing proposals for further workforce reductions, which will be submitted to White House Budget Director Russ Vought. These plans will be factored into the president’s upcoming budget request to Congress. Kupor met with budget officials on Wednesday to discuss the process. The scale of the anticipated cuts could have wide-reaching effects on public services and operations, though the administration maintains they are necessary for long-term fiscal sustainability. Trump’s downsizing push has drawn criticism from some employee unions and policy advocates, who warn that the reductions could weaken federal capacity in areas ranging from regulatory oversight to public health. Still, Kupor framed the changes as a strategic reset rather than an indiscriminate slashing of jobs. “We want to build a government that works smarter, not bigger,” he said. (With inputs from agencies)

OPM Director Scott Kupor declined to release agency-by-agency headcount targets, but he confirmed that OPM will publish the figures later. In the meantime, federal agencies are preparing proposals for further workforce reductions, which will be submitted to White House Budget Director.

Trump administration plans 300,000 federal job cuts in 2025

Iran's Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said on Wednesday that Western governments falsely portray sanctions as a ‘bloodless alternative to war’. He accused the US of committing crimes against humanity. Citing a Lancet study, he said the US sanctions have unilaterally killed 500,000 people every year since 1970. He called the Western sanctions 'inhumane' and called for a collective effort between the sanctioned nations for a unified response.“Western regimes have long claimed that sanctions are a bloodless alternative to war. Reality check: New study by @TheLancet says unilateral sanctions, particularly by the US, may be as lethal as war. 500+k lives claimed annually since 1970s, mostly children and the elderly,” said Seyed Abbas Araghchi.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Western regimes have long claimed that sanctions are a bloodless alternative to war. Reality check: New study by <a href="https://twitter.com/TheLancet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheLancet</a> says unilateral sanctions, particularly by the US, may be as lethal as war. 500+k lives claimed annually since 1970s, mostly children and the elderly.… <a href="https://t.co/02tIQiAFA5">pic.twitter.com/02tIQiAFA5</a>&mdash; Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) <a href="https://twitter.com/araghchi/status/1955485536962957736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 13, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Lancet study, funded by the Centre for Economic and Policy Research, conducted cross-national panel data analysis between age-specific mortality rates and 152 countries sanctioned between 1971 and 2021, applying a wide range of methods such as observational data, entropy balancing, Granger causality, event-study representations, and instrumental variables to form a causal relationship. The findings suggest that sanctions have similar impacts to war. It also suggests rethinking the foreign policy tools, highlighting the importance of exercising restraint in their use and seriously considering efforts to reform their design.Use of Economic sanctions has grown substantially, according to the Global Sanctions Database 25 per cent of all countries are subjected to sanctions either by the US or the EU or the UN between 2010-22, as compared to 8 per cent of 1970. As of August 2025, the US or the EU or the UN have sanctions over Brazil, Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, Russia and its oil buyers such as India and China, as well as Syria and Libya to some extent are under either sanctions or a heavy tariff burden. There are other kinds like the FATF blacklist, Shadow Fleet, Terrorism, and Human rights related sanctions, which encompass a complex web of global sanctions.

Iran slams US sanctions as ‘crimes against humanity’,  citing a Lancet Study Seyed Abbas Araghchi accused Western nations' sanction tactics of claiming countless lives every year since 1970. 

Iran's Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said on Wednesday that Western governments falsely portray sanctions as a ‘bloodless alternative to war’. He accused the US of committing crimes against humanity. Citing a Lancet study, he said the US sanctions have unilaterally killed 500,000 people every year since 1970. He called the Western sanctions 'inhumane' and called for a collective effort between the sanctioned nations for a unified response. “Western regimes have long claimed that sanctions are a bloodless alternative to war. Reality check: New study by @TheLancet says unilateral sanctions, particularly by the US, may be as lethal as war. 500+k lives claimed annually since 1970s, mostly children and the elderly,” said Seyed Abbas Araghchi.

Iran slams US sanctions as ‘crimes against humanity’, &nbsp;citing a Lancet study Seyed Abbas Araghchi accused Western nations' sanction tactics of claiming countless lives every year since 1970.&nbsp;

'As deadly as war’: Iran says US sanctions kill 500,000 people a year, mostly children

The US government’s budget deficit climbed by nearly 20 per cent in July to $291 billion, driven by rising government outlays that outpaced an increase in revenue, despite a surge in tariff collections from US President Donald Trump’s import taxes. According to Treasury Department data released on August 12, the deficit for July was up 19 per cent, or $47 billion, from the same month last year. Receipts totalled $338 billion, marking a modest 2 per cent growth, or an additional $8 billion. However, government outlays rose by a far larger 10 per cent, totalling $630 billion, a record high for July.<h2>Trump’s tariff revenues soar, but not enough to offset spending</h2>A key factor in the government's revenue boost was a dramatic rise in customs duty collections. July’s tariff revenue jumped 273 per cent, or $21 billion, compared to the same period last year, reaching approximately $27.7 billion. The increase is attributed to higher tariffs imposed on imports by President Trump, particularly following his trade policies with China and other countries.Despite the surge in tariff income, US spending continues to grow faster than revenues. Much of the increase in outlays is linked to a rise in interest payments on public debt, as well as higher government healthcare costs and inflation-driven Social Security payments. Over the first 10 months of the fiscal year, the deficit has reached $1.629 trillion, a 7 per cent increase from the previous year. While tariff revenues have helped to offset some of the rising costs, economists note that the overall impact on reducing the deficit remains uncertain.&nbsp;<h2>Trade negotiations and future tariff revenue</h2>The growing tariff income is being closely watched as part of the Trump administration’s broader plan to reduce the deficit. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has stated that the administration remains focused on bringing down the deficit, even as the US gross national debt approaches $37 trillion.In related news, US President Trump extended his trade truce with China for another 90 days, maintaining the 30 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports as a bargaining chip. While negotiations continue, experts speculate that the US could see more tariff revenue as companies deplete their inventories and begin importing more goods, triggering additional duties. However, many are sceptical about the long-term effectiveness of the tariff strategy, with concerns that higher costs for consumers and reduced trade growth could ultimately offset any gains in federal revenue.

A key factor in the government's revenue boost was a dramatic rise in customs duty collections. July’s tariff revenue jumped 273 per cent, or $21 billion, compared to the same period last year, reaching approximately $27.7 billion. 

The US government’s budget deficit climbed by nearly 20 per cent in July to $291 billion, driven by rising government outlays that outpaced an increase in revenue, despite a surge in tariff collections from US President Donald Trump’s import taxes. According to Treasury Department data released on August 12, the deficit for July was up 19 per cent, or $47 billion, from the same month last year. Receipts totalled $338 billion, marking a modest 2 per cent growth, or an additional $8 billion. However, government outlays rose by a far larger 10 per cent, totalling $630 billion, a record high for July. Trump’s tariff revenues soar, but not enough to offset spending A key factor in the government's revenue boost was a dramatic rise in customs duty collections. July’s tariff revenue jumped 273 per cent, or $21 billion, compared to the same period last year, reaching approximately $27.7 billion. The increase is attributed to higher tariffs imposed on imports by President Trump, particularly following his trade policies with China and other countries. Despite the surge in tariff income, US spending continues to grow faster than revenues. Much of the increase in outlays is linked to a rise in interest payments on public debt, as well as higher government healthcare costs and inflation-driven Social Security payments. Over the first 10 months of the fiscal year, the deficit has reached $1.629 trillion, a 7 per cent increase from the previous year. While tariff revenues have helped to offset some of the rising costs, economists note that the overall impact on reducing the deficit remains uncertain. Trade negotiations and future tariff revenue The growing tariff income is being closely watched as part of the Trump administration’s broader plan to reduce the deficit. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has stated that the administration remains focused on bringing down the deficit, even as the US gross national debt approaches $37 trillion. In related news, US President Trump extended his trade truce with China for another 90 days, maintaining the 30 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports as a bargaining chip. While negotiations continue, experts speculate that the US could see more tariff revenue as companies deplete their inventories and begin importing more goods, triggering additional duties. However, many are sceptical about the long-term effectiveness of the tariff strategy, with concerns that higher costs for consumers and reduced trade growth could ultimately offset any gains in federal revenue.

A key factor in the government's revenue boost was a dramatic rise in customs duty collections. July’s tariff revenue jumped 273 per cent, or $21 billion, compared to the same period last year, reaching approximately $27.7 billion.&nbsp;

US budget deficit surges 20% in July despite record tariff revenues

The White House announced on Thursday that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he may use the National Guard to police the streets of the capital, and a White House official said federal law enforcement would build its presence there this week. The move represents the latest step by Trump and his administration toward taking over running the city that serves as the seat of the US government.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;"President Trump has directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement to protect innocent citizens. Starting tonight, there will be no safe harbor for violent criminals in DC," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/another-country-backs-trump-s-nobel-peace-prize-dream-sends-official-letter-what-we-know-1754619412231">Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter – What we know</a>&nbsp;Multiple agencies are contributing to the effort, starting in the early hours of Friday morning. The operation will begin as a 7-day effort that may be extended, a separate White House official said.It will be led by the US Park Police and include officials from the Capitol Police, Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The National Guard was not listed by the official as taking part.

The United States announced on Thursday (August 8) that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight.

The White House announced on Thursday that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he may use the National Guard to police the streets of the capital, and a White House official said federal law enforcement would build its presence there this week. The move represents the latest step by Trump and his administration toward taking over running the city that serves as the seat of the US government. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed "President Trump has directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement to protect innocent citizens. Starting tonight, there will be no safe harbor for violent criminals in DC," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. Also read: Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter – What we know Multiple agencies are contributing to the effort, starting in the early hours of Friday morning. The operation will begin as a 7-day effort that may be extended, a separate White House official said. It will be led by the US Park Police and include officials from the Capitol Police, Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The National Guard was not listed by the official as taking part.

The United States announced on Thursday (August 8) that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight.

White House ups federal law enforcement at tourist hot spots in Washington, DC

US President Donald Trump has said he is ordering a “new and highly accurate CENSUS” that would exclude undocumented immigrants. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote, “People who are in our country illegally will NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS.” He added that the new count would be based on “information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024.” This proposal marks a major departure from the traditional census, which is constitutionally required to count everyone living in the United States, citizen or not, every 10 years.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-50-000-bonuses-loan-forgiveness-us-drops-age-cap-for-ice-hires-in-biggest-recruitment-drive-in-history-teens-to-join-trump-s-deportation-push-1754510586117">'$50,000 bonuses, loan forgiveness': US drops age cap for ICE hires in biggest recruitment drive in history - Teens to join Trump's deportation push?</a><h2>Why is the census important?</h2>Census data is used to determine how many seats each state receives in the House of Representatives, a process known as apportionment. The numbers also help allocate billions in government funding. Trying to exclude undocumented immigrants from the count could change how resources and political representation are distributed. A 2020 Pew Research Center report suggested that such a move could cost states like California and Texas seats in Congress.<h2>Can Trump legally do this?</h2>Experts say any attempt to run a mid-decade census would face serious legal and logistical issues. A full census has never been held outside the usual 10-year cycle, and planning for the 2030 census is already under way.The Supreme Court previously blocked Trump’s effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, saying it did not follow proper procedures. The law also requires census questions to be approved by Congress at least two years in advance. It’s still unclear whether Trump wants to run a new census or simply change how apportionment totals are calculated. Either move would likely face court challenges.<h2>What happened during the last census?</h2>The 2020 census was conducted mostly under Trump’s first term, but was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. It was completed and released in early 2021, after President Biden took office. That delay stopped Trump from removing undocumented immigrants from the apportionment count at the time. The Census Bureau later said it had likely undercounted Black people, Hispanics and Native Americans, while white and Asian people may have been overcounted.<h2>Who supports the idea?</h2>Some Republicans back the move. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has claimed the 2020 count was flawed and urged Trump to push for a new one. Trump has also called for Republican states to redraw their district maps to ensure control of the House, saying his party is “entitled” to the seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have vowed to fight back.<h2>What’s happening at the Census Bureau?</h2>The former Census Bureau Director, Robert Santos stepped down earlier this year. Appointed by Biden, he left midway through his term, citing family reasons. His departure gives Trump a chance to appoint a new leader to the agency. So far, no replacement has been named. Even if Trump waits for the 2030 census, he could still influence how it’s conducted. Under federal law, the questions must be sent to Congress two years in advance, well before the end of Trump’s possible second term in 2029.

Trump proposes a new census excluding undocumented immigrants, diverging from constitutional norms. This could impact House seat apportionment and federal funding, potentially reducing representation for states like California and Texas.

US President Donald Trump has said he is ordering a “new and highly accurate CENSUS” that would exclude undocumented immigrants. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote, “People who are in our country illegally will NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS.” He added that the new count would be based on “information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024.” This proposal marks a major departure from the traditional census, which is constitutionally required to count everyone living in the United States, citizen or not, every 10 years. Also read: '$50,000 bonuses, loan forgiveness': US drops age cap for ICE hires in biggest recruitment drive in history - Teens to join Trump's deportation push? Why is the census important? Census data is used to determine how many seats each state receives in the House of Representatives, a process known as apportionment. The numbers also help allocate billions in government funding. Trying to exclude undocumented immigrants from the count could change how resources and political representation are distributed. A 2020 Pew Research Center report suggested that such a move could cost states like California and Texas seats in Congress. Can Trump legally do this? Experts say any attempt to run a mid-decade census would face serious legal and logistical issues. A full census has never been held outside the usual 10-year cycle, and planning for the 2030 census is already under way. The Supreme Court previously blocked Trump’s effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, saying it did not follow proper procedures. The law also requires census questions to be approved by Congress at least two years in advance. It’s still unclear whether Trump wants to run a new census or simply change how apportionment totals are calculated. Either move would likely face court challenges. What happened during the last census? The 2020 census was conducted mostly under Trump’s first term, but was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. It was completed and released in early 2021, after President Biden took office. That delay stopped Trump from removing undocumented immigrants from the apportionment count at the time. The Census Bureau later said it had likely undercounted Black people, Hispanics and Native Americans, while white and Asian people may have been overcounted. Who supports the idea? Some Republicans back the move. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has claimed the 2020 count was flawed and urged Trump to push for a new one. Trump has also called for Republican states to redraw their district maps to ensure control of the House, saying his party is “entitled” to the seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have vowed to fight back. What’s happening at the Census Bureau? The former Census Bureau Director, Robert Santos stepped down earlier this year. Appointed by Biden, he left midway through his term, citing family reasons. His departure gives Trump a chance to appoint a new leader to the agency. So far, no replacement has been named. Even if Trump waits for the 2030 census, he could still influence how it’s conducted. Under federal law, the questions must be sent to Congress two years in advance, well before the end of Trump’s possible second term in 2029.

Trump proposes a new census excluding undocumented immigrants, diverging from constitutional norms. This could impact House seat apportionment and federal funding, potentially reducing representation for states like California and Texas.

Can Trump order a new census? US president pushes to leave out ‘illegal' undocumented immigrants

The Trump administration is aiming to simplify the use of drones for commercial purposes, ranging from delivering coffee to inspecting infrastructure and supporting agricultural activities. A new proposal was announced on Tuesday by the Transportation Secretary, Sean Duffy, outlining how businesses could gain approval to operate drones in US airspace and the regulations they would have to follow.&nbsp;Previously, companies seeking to fly drones beyond the operator's visual line of sight had to apply for a waiver or exemption, which was awarded on a case-by-case basis, Duffy said. "And because of that complication, I don't think we saw the innovation that we should have in America," he added.&nbsp;This move follows an executive order signed by President Trump two months ago, intended to speed up the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by businesses in the United States. The announcement of Duffy was welcomed by drone industry stakeholders, saying that advancements in drone technology have surpassed the ability of the government to regulate the aircraft.&nbsp;"Drone operators must navigate a labyrinth of ill-suited regulations designed for crude aircraft, placing an artificial ceiling on innovation and hampering progress," CEO of the Commercial Drone Alliance, Lisa Ellman, said. "In the meantime, we've seen our global peers and adversaries surge ahead in the deployment of commercial drone technology," she added, NPR reported.<h3>Complex and restrictive processes vs growth</h3>Earlier, businesses had to request individual waivers or exemptions for those who were seeking to fly drones beyond the operator’s visual line of sight. In response, Duffy noted that complex and restrictive processes were hampering innovation in the country.&nbsp;In an emailed statement, the Air Line Pilots Association told NPR that in order to ensure that emerging technologies and drone operations do not compromise aviation safety, it is committed to working with the Department of Transportation.&nbsp;The group added that "recent tragic events have underscored the critical importance of maintaining rigorous safety standards in our increasingly complex airspace, and we will continue advocating for policies that require all airspace users to operate with adequate surveillance, communication, and collision avoidance capabilities."

After Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced the order, drone industry stakeholders welcomed this move, saying that advancements in drone technology have surpassed the ability of the government to regulate the aircraft.

The Trump administration is aiming to simplify the use of drones for commercial purposes, ranging from delivering coffee to inspecting infrastructure and supporting agricultural activities. A new proposal was announced on Tuesday by the Transportation Secretary, Sean Duffy, outlining how businesses could gain approval to operate drones in US airspace and the regulations they would have to follow. Previously, companies seeking to fly drones beyond the operator's visual line of sight had to apply for a waiver or exemption, which was awarded on a case-by-case basis, Duffy said. "And because of that complication, I don't think we saw the innovation that we should have in America," he added. This move follows an executive order signed by President Trump two months ago, intended to speed up the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by businesses in the United States. The announcement of Duffy was welcomed by drone industry stakeholders, saying that advancements in drone technology have surpassed the ability of the government to regulate the aircraft. "Drone operators must navigate a labyrinth of ill-suited regulations designed for crude aircraft, placing an artificial ceiling on innovation and hampering progress," CEO of the Commercial Drone Alliance, Lisa Ellman, said. "In the meantime, we've seen our global peers and adversaries surge ahead in the deployment of commercial drone technology," she added, NPR reported. Complex and restrictive processes vs growth Earlier, businesses had to request individual waivers or exemptions for those who were seeking to fly drones beyond the operator’s visual line of sight. In response, Duffy noted that complex and restrictive processes were hampering innovation in the country. In an emailed statement, the Air Line Pilots Association told NPR that in order to ensure that emerging technologies and drone operations do not compromise aviation safety, it is committed to working with the Department of Transportation. The group added that "recent tragic events have underscored the critical importance of maintaining rigorous safety standards in our increasingly complex airspace, and we will continue advocating for policies that require all airspace users to operate with adequate surveillance, communication, and collision avoidance capabilities."

After Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced the order, drone industry stakeholders welcomed this move, saying that advancements in drone technology have surpassed the ability of the government to regulate the aircraft.

Drones to deliver your coffee? Trump administration pushes for wider use of UAVs in business

The deadly midair collision between a US Army helicopter and a commercial passenger jet that killed 67 people in January may have been caused by faulty altitude readings aboard the military aircraft. This was revealed at an investigative hearing into the crash. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the US agency tasked with looking into the fatal aircraft crash, held hearings this week, from Wednesday to Friday. It revealed that the Sikorsky Black Hawk helicopter involved in the crash may have been flying lower than its instruments showed at the time of impact—potentially contributing to the tragedy.<h2>‘Concerning’ faulty altimeter readings the cause?</h2>The crash occurred on January 29 just outside Washington, DC, as a Bombardier CRJ700 passenger jet was making its final approach to Reagan National Airport. The jet, operated by a regional subsidiary of American Airlines, had departed from Wichita, Kansas. The Black Hawk, meanwhile, was on a training flight. All 67 people aboard both aircraft were killed. There were no survivors.The NTSB's investigative hearing, held over three days this week, brought together experts, air traffic controllers, and federal regulators for intense questioning. One shocking detail that emerged from the hearings: a mismatch between two of the helicopter's key instruments—the radar altimeter and the barometric altimeter.Under the investigation, tests were conducted on three similar Black Hawk Lima models from the same Army battalion. The findings revealed this week showed a significant difference between the altitude indicated by the radar altimeter and the barometric altimeter on the aircraft.Marie Moler, a lead investigator, explained that tests "showed an 80- to 130-foot (24- to 40-meter) difference in flight". In test environments without full rotor lift, the margin narrowed to 20 to 55 feet."Once the helicopter rotors were turning and producing lift and thrust, the altimeter readings lowered significantly and stayed lower throughout the flights," Moler said.NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said the finding is troubling. "A 100-foot difference is significant,” she noted, especially in the airspace where the crash occurred—just over the Potomac River, where helicopters are required to fly below 200 feet (60.96 metres)."I am concerned. There is a possibility that what the crew saw was very different than what the true altitude was," Homendy added.The NTSB first flagged the issue in a preliminary report back in February, but the latest findings suggest the altimeter discrepancy wasn't a one-off error. It could be systemic.Despite no current evidence linking staffing decisions to the crash, President Donald Trump had sought to blame diversity hiring policies in aviation for the tragic midair collision.

An NTSB investigation revealed that the Sikorsky Black Hawk helicopter involved in the crash may have been flying lower than its instruments showed at the time of impact—potentially contributing to the tragedy.

The deadly midair collision between a US Army helicopter and a commercial passenger jet that killed 67 people in January may have been caused by faulty altitude readings aboard the military aircraft. This was revealed at an investigative hearing into the crash. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the US agency tasked with looking into the fatal aircraft crash, held hearings this week, from Wednesday to Friday. It revealed that the Sikorsky Black Hawk helicopter involved in the crash may have been flying lower than its instruments showed at the time of impact—potentially contributing to the tragedy. ‘Concerning’ faulty altimeter readings the cause? The crash occurred on January 29 just outside Washington, DC, as a Bombardier CRJ700 passenger jet was making its final approach to Reagan National Airport. The jet, operated by a regional subsidiary of American Airlines, had departed from Wichita, Kansas. The Black Hawk, meanwhile, was on a training flight. All 67 people aboard both aircraft were killed. There were no survivors. The NTSB's investigative hearing, held over three days this week, brought together experts, air traffic controllers, and federal regulators for intense questioning. One shocking detail that emerged from the hearings: a mismatch between two of the helicopter's key instruments—the radar altimeter and the barometric altimeter. Under the investigation, tests were conducted on three similar Black Hawk Lima models from the same Army battalion. The findings revealed this week showed a significant difference between the altitude indicated by the radar altimeter and the barometric altimeter on the aircraft. Marie Moler, a lead investigator, explained that tests "showed an 80- to 130-foot (24- to 40-meter) difference in flight". In test environments without full rotor lift, the margin narrowed to 20 to 55 feet. "Once the helicopter rotors were turning and producing lift and thrust, the altimeter readings lowered significantly and stayed lower throughout the flights," Moler said. NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said the finding is troubling. "A 100-foot difference is significant,” she noted, especially in the airspace where the crash occurred—just over the Potomac River, where helicopters are required to fly below 200 feet (60.96 metres). "I am concerned. There is a possibility that what the crew saw was very different than what the true altitude was," Homendy added. The NTSB first flagged the issue in a preliminary report back in February, but the latest findings suggest the altimeter discrepancy wasn't a one-off error. It could be systemic. Despite no current evidence linking staffing decisions to the crash, President Donald Trump had sought to blame diversity hiring policies in aviation for the tragic midair collision.

An NTSB investigation revealed that the Sikorsky Black Hawk helicopter involved in the crash may have been flying lower than its instruments showed at the time of impact—potentially contributing to the tragedy.

Washington plane collision: 'Concerning' 100-foot altimeter error led to deadly US Army Black Hawk helicopter-jet crash, reveals NTSB investigation

US inflation accelerated in June as import tariffs drove up the cost of consumer goods such as furniture, appliances, and recreational products, reinforcing expectations that the Federal Reserve will delay interest rate cuts until at least October. The Commerce Department reported on July 31 that the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, rose 0.3 per cent in June after an upwardly revised 0.2 per cent gain in May. On a year-on-year basis, inflation hit 2.6 per cent, up from 2.4 per cent in May and above the central bank’s 2 per cent target.Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also rose 0.3 per cent on the month and remained at 2.8 per cent annually. Economists noted this sustained upward pressure is being driven by higher goods prices, especially in tariff-sensitive sectors. Furniture prices climbed 1.3 per cent, appliances jumped 1.9 per cent, and computers rose 1.4 per cent, some of the largest monthly increases in years.<h2>Fed holds steady amid persistent inflation</h2>The Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged this week at 4.25-4.50 per cent, citing ongoing inflation risks. Fed Chair Jerome Powell emphasised the need for more data to determine whether recent inflationary trends are temporary or indicative of sustained pressure due to import duties imposed during President Donald Trump’s administration. While Powell refrained from offering a clear timeline for policy easing, financial markets, which had previously priced in a potential September cut, have now pushed back expectations.Inflation-adjusted wages and incomes have also begun to feel the strain. Real disposable income was flat in June, despite a 0.3 per cent nominal income gain. The saving rate held at 4.5 per cent, indicating growing consumer caution.<h2>Consumer spending holds, but outlook weakens</h2>Despite rising prices, consumer spending edged up 0.3 per cent in June after being flat in May. Adjusted for inflation, spending rose a modest 0.1 per cent. Overall, the economy grew at a 3.0 per cent annual rate in the second quarter, boosted largely by a sharp drop in imports. However, underlying consumer demand remains tepid. Second-quarter spending grew at just a 1.4 per cent annualised pace, up from 0.5 per cent in Q1, suggesting households are becoming more cautious in the face of rising costs and a cooling labour market.Initial jobless claims ticked up slightly last week, and economists expect the July employment report to show a higher unemployment rate of 4.2 per cent, up from 4.1 per cent in June. With core inflation remaining stubbornly above target and price pressures broadening, the Fed appears likely to keep rates higher for longer, weighing on economic momentum into the fall.

Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also rose 0.3 per cent on the month and remained at 2.8 per cent annually. Economists noted this sustained upward pressure is being driven by higher goods prices, especially in tariff-sensitive sectors.

US inflation accelerated in June as import tariffs drove up the cost of consumer goods such as furniture, appliances, and recreational products, reinforcing expectations that the Federal Reserve will delay interest rate cuts until at least October. The Commerce Department reported on July 31 that the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, rose 0.3 per cent in June after an upwardly revised 0.2 per cent gain in May. On a year-on-year basis, inflation hit 2.6 per cent, up from 2.4 per cent in May and above the central bank’s 2 per cent target. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also rose 0.3 per cent on the month and remained at 2.8 per cent annually. Economists noted this sustained upward pressure is being driven by higher goods prices, especially in tariff-sensitive sectors. Furniture prices climbed 1.3 per cent, appliances jumped 1.9 per cent, and computers rose 1.4 per cent, some of the largest monthly increases in years. Fed holds steady amid persistent inflation The Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged this week at 4.25-4.50 per cent, citing ongoing inflation risks. Fed Chair Jerome Powell emphasised the need for more data to determine whether recent inflationary trends are temporary or indicative of sustained pressure due to import duties imposed during President Donald Trump’s administration. While Powell refrained from offering a clear timeline for policy easing, financial markets, which had previously priced in a potential September cut, have now pushed back expectations. Inflation-adjusted wages and incomes have also begun to feel the strain. Real disposable income was flat in June, despite a 0.3 per cent nominal income gain. The saving rate held at 4.5 per cent, indicating growing consumer caution. Consumer spending holds, but outlook weakens Despite rising prices, consumer spending edged up 0.3 per cent in June after being flat in May. Adjusted for inflation, spending rose a modest 0.1 per cent. Overall, the economy grew at a 3.0 per cent annual rate in the second quarter, boosted largely by a sharp drop in imports. However, underlying consumer demand remains tepid. Second-quarter spending grew at just a 1.4 per cent annualised pace, up from 0.5 per cent in Q1, suggesting households are becoming more cautious in the face of rising costs and a cooling labour market. Initial jobless claims ticked up slightly last week, and economists expect the July employment report to show a higher unemployment rate of 4.2 per cent, up from 4.1 per cent in June. With core inflation remaining stubbornly above target and price pressures broadening, the Fed appears likely to keep rates higher for longer, weighing on economic momentum into the fall.

Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also rose 0.3 per cent on the month and remained at 2.8 per cent annually. Economists noted this sustained upward pressure is being driven by higher goods prices, especially in tariff-sensitive sectors.

US inflation rises in June as tariffs fuel price increases

A Colorado dentist, James Craig, was given a life term without the possibility of parole on Wednesday in the US for killing his wife by lacing her protein shakes with poison before mixing a dose of cyanide while she was admitted to a hospital bed. After delivering the verdicts in the courtroom, a tearful testimony followed where Angela Craig’s relatives mourned her death, and one of the couple’s six children labelled her father a ‘villain.’&nbsp;Miriam ‘Mira’ Meservy, the daughter of the couple, said, “I was supposed to be able to trust my dad; he was supposed to be my hero, and instead he’ll forever be the villain in my book."&nbsp;Son Toliver Craig also broke down in tears and stated that after his mother’s death, he used to set a daily alarm for 10 pm that just says ‘Mom.’ “I’m sad there’s not more time with her,” he added. Meanwhile, James Craig refused to make any remarks before he was taken outside the courtroom, news agency AP reported.&nbsp;After murdering his wife, James Craig claimed that he had helped her commit suicide after he told her that he needed a divorce. After multiple extramarital affairs, he was looking to get out of the marriage but didn’t want a divorce in order to protect his money and social image, James further claimed.<h3>Life imprisonment without ‘parole’</h3>The district judge sentenced him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the mandatory punishment for first-degree murder in Colorado. Craig was also convicted of trying to stage the death as a suicide, asking others to help fabricate evidence.&nbsp;Prosecutors stated that Craig attempted to poison his wife over 10 days in March 2023 by lacing her protein shakes, but when the conspiracy failed, he gave her cyanide while she was hospitalised with symptoms.&nbsp;Tests later confirmed that Angela Craig, 43, died from poisoning caused by cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, a substance found in eye drops.&nbsp;Angela Craig’s older sister, Toni Kofoed, said: “You have taken away our opportunity to grow old together… Angela had a love and a passion for life. She loved her children, and, unfortunately, she loved you.”

Craig was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, along with the mandatory punishment for first-degree murder in the US state of Colorado. He was also convicted of trying to portray murder as a suicide, asking others to help fabricate evidence.



A Colorado dentist, James Craig, was given a life term without the possibility of parole on Wednesday in the US for killing his wife by lacing her protein shakes with poison before mixing a dose of cyanide while she was admitted to a hospital bed. After delivering the verdicts in the courtroom, a tearful testimony followed where Angela Craig’s relatives mourned her death, and one of the couple’s six children labelled her father a ‘villain.’ Miriam ‘Mira’ Meservy, the daughter of the couple, said, “I was supposed to be able to trust my dad; he was supposed to be my hero, and instead he’ll forever be the villain in my book." Son Toliver Craig also broke down in tears and stated that after his mother’s death, he used to set a daily alarm for 10 pm that just says ‘Mom.’ “I’m sad there’s not more time with her,” he added. Meanwhile, James Craig refused to make any remarks before he was taken outside the courtroom, news agency AP reported. After murdering his wife, James Craig claimed that he had helped her commit suicide after he told her that he needed a divorce. After multiple extramarital affairs, he was looking to get out of the marriage but didn’t want a divorce in order to protect his money and social image, James further claimed. Life imprisonment without ‘parole’ The district judge sentenced him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the mandatory punishment for first-degree murder in Colorado. Craig was also convicted of trying to stage the death as a suicide, asking others to help fabricate evidence. Prosecutors stated that Craig attempted to poison his wife over 10 days in March 2023 by lacing her protein shakes, but when the conspiracy failed, he gave her cyanide while she was hospitalised with symptoms. Tests later confirmed that Angela Craig, 43, died from poisoning caused by cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, a substance found in eye drops. Angela Craig’s older sister, Toni Kofoed, said: “You have taken away our opportunity to grow old together… Angela had a love and a passion for life. She loved her children, and, unfortunately, she loved you.”

Craig was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, along with the mandatory punishment for first-degree murder in the US state of Colorado. He was also convicted of trying to portray murder as a suicide, asking others to help fabricate evidence.&nbsp;

'Dad will always be villain': Daughter mourns as US dentist sentenced to life for wife’s murder in 2023

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Monday, in a post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), warned US President Donald Trump not to play the 'ultimatum game' and not to go down the ‘Sleepy Joe road’! Every threat of ultimatum is considered from Russia's side as a step towards war.&nbsp;“Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don't go down the Sleepy Joe road!” wrote Medvedev.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Trump&#39;s playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10… He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn&#39;t Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don&#39;t go down the Sleepy Joe road!&mdash; Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) <a href="https://twitter.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1949870764938711343?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Dmitry Medvedev, who is known for his evocative comments, has drawn a reaction from US Senator Lindsey Graham. He was quick to defend US President Donald Trump's position to end the war.In a reply to Medvedev's post, he wrote, “You and your customers will soon be sadly mistaken. You will also soon see that Joe Biden is no longer president. Get to the peace table.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">To those in Russia who believe that President Trump is not serious about ending the bloodbath between Russia and Ukraine: You and your customers will soon be sadly mistaken. You will also soon see that Joe Biden is no longer president. Get to the peace table. <a href="https://t.co/IRWk9I0Ljf">https://t.co/IRWk9I0Ljf</a>&mdash; Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1949938809095016804?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US President Donald had earlier in the month given a 50-day ultimatum to Russia to end hostilities with Ukraine. But Trump was growing impatient at Russia's reluctance to negotiate a peace. On Monday, he reduced the time frame from 50 days to a 10-12-day period.&nbsp;"I've spoken to President Putin a lot, I've gotten along with him very well," he said, adding that Putin “goes out and starts launching rockets into some city, like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever, you have bodies lying all over the street.”The US had threatened to impose a 100 per cent tariff on Russia and its trading partners unless an agreement on resolving the Ukraine conflict was achieved within 50 days. The US had also continued to send weapons to Kyiv as long as the EU vows to pay for it.&nbsp;

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has hit out at US President Donald Trump, saying Russia is neither Israel nor Iran, and it is not afraid of any ultimatum from anyone.

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Monday, in a post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), warned US President Donald Trump not to play the 'ultimatum game' and not to go down the ‘Sleepy Joe road’! Every threat of ultimatum is considered from Russia's side as a step towards war. “Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don't go down the Sleepy Joe road!” wrote Medvedev.

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has hit back at US President Donald Trump, saying Russia is neither Israel nor Iran, and it is not afraid of any ultimatum from anyone.

Russia unfazed by Trump's ultimatum – 'Every threat is a step towards war'

Nearly one in five NASA employees have applied to leave the premier space research agency in a development that is sending ripples through the organisation's structure. About 3,870 employees, more than 20 per cent, have applied to leave NASA through the Trump administration's deferred resignation programme. At the centre of this is the sweeping reform initiated by Elon Musk's brainchild, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).These resignations will shrink the workforce of NASA from 18000 to nearly 14,000, including the 500 left by normal attrition.&nbsp;<h2>DOGE’s Role: Central &amp; Controversial</h2>The deferred resignation programme was a buyout programme launched by the White House's Department of Government Efficiency. Established in January 2025 under the oversight of a billionaire and a close confidant of the US President Donald Trump to slash federal waste, modernise bureaucracy, and eliminate redundancies.In mid-February, DOGE audited NASA, its contracts and budgeting system. As a result, about 900 employees left the organisation in the first round, and 3000 more followed second round under the deferred resignation programme. A budget proposal issued in May by the White House saw NASA's funding cut by 25 per cent from $24 billion to $18 billion for the FY 25-26.&nbsp;Notably among the departing are 2,000 senior-level employees, including scientists, engineers, and managers, many essential to the ongoing missions. One Caltech research scientist, Dr. Jessie Christiansen, warned about “deep knowledge and expertise holes across all NASA centres,”“Safety remains a top priority for our agency as we balance the need to become a more streamlined and more efficient organisation and work to ensure we remain fully capable of pursuing a Golden Era of exploration and innovation, including to the Moon and Mars,” said NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner.There is a crisis with NASA's top leadership; earlier, it was supposed to be the billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, a friend of Elon Musk. But his nomination was cancelled just ahead of the Senate confirmation, and public fallout followed between Elon Musk and Trump. Now, Sean Duffy, the Transportation Secretary, is temporarily leading the premier research agency.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Nearly 3870 employees, including scientists, engineers, and managers, decided to leave the premier space research agency under the deferred resignation programme as part of the reform initiated by Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Nearly one in five NASA employees have applied to leave the premier space research agency in a development that is sending ripples through the organisation's structure. About 3,870 employees, more than 20 per cent, have applied to leave NASA through the Trump administration's deferred resignation programme. At the centre of this is the sweeping reform initiated by Elon Musk's brainchild, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). These resignations will shrink the workforce of NASA from 18000 to nearly 14,000, including the 500 left by normal attrition. DOGE’s Role: Central & Controversial The deferred resignation programme was a buyout programme launched by the White House's Department of Government Efficiency. Established in January 2025 under the oversight of a billionaire and a close confidant of the US President Donald Trump to slash federal waste, modernise bureaucracy, and eliminate redundancies. In mid-February, DOGE audited NASA, its contracts and budgeting system. As a result, about 900 employees left the organisation in the first round, and 3000 more followed second round under the deferred resignation programme. A budget proposal issued in May by the White House saw NASA's funding cut by 25 per cent from $24 billion to $18 billion for the FY 25-26. Notably among the departing are 2,000 senior-level employees, including scientists, engineers, and managers, many essential to the ongoing missions. One Caltech research scientist, Dr. Jessie Christiansen, warned about “deep knowledge and expertise holes across all NASA centres,” “Safety remains a top priority for our agency as we balance the need to become a more streamlined and more efficient organisation and work to ensure we remain fully capable of pursuing a Golden Era of exploration and innovation, including to the Moon and Mars,” said NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner. There is a crisis with NASA's top leadership; earlier, it was supposed to be the billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, a friend of Elon Musk. But his nomination was cancelled just ahead of the Senate confirmation, and public fallout followed between Elon Musk and Trump. Now, Sean Duffy, the Transportation Secretary, is temporarily leading the premier research agency.

Nearly 3870 employees, including scientists, engineers, and managers, decided to leave the premier space research agency under the deferred resignation programme as part of the reform initiated by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Devastating legacy of Musk led DOGE: More than 20% NASA employees quit

The White House on Friday in a statement confirmed that it “remains open to engaging” &nbsp;with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to achieve a “fully denuclearised North Korea”. This development comes a day after the Trump administration's crackdown on illicit funding loops of North Korea. The statement is coherent with the objectives of the first term, where Trump held three high-level summits with North Korea to pursue denuclearisation, though these talks failed without any concrete progress.&nbsp;"President Trump in his first term held three historic summits with North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un that stabilised the Korean Peninsula and achieved the first-ever leader-level agreement on denuclearisation," said a White House official to Yonhap News Agency. The three meetings happened in Singapore in 2018, Hanoi in February 2019, and Panmunjom in June 2019, respectively.Notably, on July 24, the US Department of the Treasury sanctioned the Korea Sobaeksu Trading Company and three individuals, Kim Se Un, Jo Kyong Hun, and Myong Chol Min, allegedly linking them with illicit funding of Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile programs.&nbsp;In June, Trump seemed optimistic to get "the conflict solved" with North Korea, if there is one, hinting at the possibility of a dialogue. The administration seems to be taking a dual approach, on the one hand remaining open to diplomacy and on the other hand pressuring it through sanctions and enforcement actions.<h2>How did North Korea respond?</h2>North Korea did not respond positively to Trump's overtures. Late in June, North Korean diplomats refused a letter from Trump displaying a strong pushback against any renewed communication. Meanwhile, Kim Jong Un has repeatedly denounced the US, South Korea and Japan military partnership. It vowed to modernise its missiles and increase its nuclear arsenal. Analysts suggest that North Korea is less interested in US engagement, with strong diplomatic relations with Russia and China.

The White House on Friday said that it wants a fully denuclearised North Korea and remains open to talks with Kim Jong Un for that purpose. Historically, North Korea opposed US dominance in the Korean Peninsula and the US, South Korea and Japan military partnership.

The White House on Friday in a statement confirmed that it “remains open to engaging” with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to achieve a “fully denuclearised North Korea”. This development comes a day after the Trump administration's crackdown on illicit funding loops of North Korea. The statement is coherent with the objectives of the first term, where Trump held three high-level summits with North Korea to pursue denuclearisation, though these talks failed without any concrete progress. "President Trump in his first term held three historic summits with North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un that stabilised the Korean Peninsula and achieved the first-ever leader-level agreement on denuclearisation," said a White House official to Yonhap News Agency. The three meetings happened in Singapore in 2018, Hanoi in February 2019, and Panmunjom in June 2019, respectively. Notably, on July 24, the US Department of the Treasury sanctioned the Korea Sobaeksu Trading Company and three individuals, Kim Se Un, Jo Kyong Hun, and Myong Chol Min, allegedly linking them with illicit funding of Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile programs. In June, Trump seemed optimistic to get "the conflict solved" with North Korea, if there is one, hinting at the possibility of a dialogue. The administration seems to be taking a dual approach, on the one hand remaining open to diplomacy and on the other hand pressuring it through sanctions and enforcement actions. How did North Korea respond? North Korea did not respond positively to Trump's overtures. Late in June, North Korean diplomats refused a letter from Trump displaying a strong pushback against any renewed communication. Meanwhile, Kim Jong Un has repeatedly denounced the US, South Korea and Japan military partnership. It vowed to modernise its missiles and increase its nuclear arsenal. Analysts suggest that North Korea is less interested in US engagement, with strong diplomatic relations with Russia and China.

The White House on Friday said that it wants a fully denuclearised North Korea and remains open to talks with Kim Jong Un for that purpose. Historically, North Korea opposed US dominance in the Korean Peninsula and the US, South Korea and Japan military partnership.

Trump open to talks with Kim — but only after ‘FULL DENUCLEARISATION'

US Senator Lindsey Graham has warned to impose steep tariffs on India, China, and Brazil if they don't stop buying oil from Russia, as it is fueling Russia to wage a war against Ukraine. He added that the Trump administration was planning to impose a 100 per cent tariff on oil-related imports.Speaking on Fox News, Graham said, "I would tell China, India &amp; Brazil. If you keep buying cheap Russian oil, to allow this war to continue, we will tariff the hell out of you. And we’re going to crush your economy, because what you are doing is blood money. He's (Putin) not going to stop until somebody makes him stop."His warning came in response to launching tougher action to cut off Russia’s revenue amid the ongoing war in Ukraine, claiming that these three nations account for around 80 per cent of Russia's crude exports, prompting Putin's war machine to continue.In a direct warning to Russia, Graham said, "The game has changed when it comes to you, President Putin. You have played President Trump at your own peril. You made a major league mistake, and your economy is going to continue to be crushed."Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-achievements-in-6-months-includes-india-pakistan-ceasefire-here-s-what-white-house-said-1753169619717">Trump's achievements in 6 months includes India-Pakistan ceasefire, here's what White House said</a>Graham claimed that Putin was attempting to recreate the former Soviet Union by "invading countries that do not belong to him." "Putin wants to take countries that are not his. In the mid-90s, Ukraine gave up 1,700 nuclear weapons with a promise that its sovereignty would be respected by Russia. Putin broke that promise," the Republican added.The US senator's response came amid intensifying US rhetoric against the country perceived to be financially backing Russia during its war against Ukraine. His stand reflected a broader push from Republican leaders urging America's allies and trade partners to economically isolate Moscow.Echoing his tough stance, US President Donald Trump, speaking alongside NATO general secretary Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, warned thatthe &nbsp;US would impose 100 percent "secondary tariffs" on any nation that continues buying oil and gas from Russia, unless President Vladimir Putin agrees to a peace settlement within the next 50 days.Frustrated with Putin, the US president said, "My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night." He emphasised that these tariffs means to bring Putin to the negotiating table. "He's fooled a lot of people," Trump said of Putin, whom he labeled a "tough guy.""He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden - he didn't fool me," Trump said, adding that "We're going to be doing secondary tariffs."<h3>What is India's reaction?</h3>India reacted to the remarks of NATO chief Rutte on possible sanctions over the trade of India with Russia and cautioned against "double standards". In response, the Foreign Ministry last week stated, "We have seen reports on the subject and are closely following the developments. Let me reiterate that securing the energy needs of our people is understandably an overriding priority for us."Warning of double standards regarding the matter, the Foreign Ministry said "In this endeavour, we are guided by what is on offer in the markets and by prevailing global circumstances. We would particularly caution against any double standards on the matter." &nbsp;

The US senator's response came amid intensifying US rhetoric against the country perceived to be financially backing Russia during its war against Ukraine. His stand reflected a broader push from Republican leaders urging America's allies and trade partners to economically isolate Moscow.

US Senator Lindsey Graham has warned to impose steep tariffs on India, China, and Brazil if they don't stop buying oil from Russia, as it is fueling Russia to wage a war against Ukraine. He added that the Trump administration was planning to impose a 100 per cent tariff on oil-related imports. Speaking on Fox News, Graham said, "I would tell China, India & Brazil. If you keep buying cheap Russian oil, to allow this war to continue, we will tariff the hell out of you. And we’re going to crush your economy, because what you are doing is blood money. He's (Putin) not going to stop until somebody makes him stop." His warning came in response to launching tougher action to cut off Russia’s revenue amid the ongoing war in Ukraine, claiming that these three nations account for around 80 per cent of Russia's crude exports, prompting Putin's war machine to continue. In a direct warning to Russia, Graham said, "The game has changed when it comes to you, President Putin. You have played President Trump at your own peril. You made a major league mistake, and your economy is going to continue to be crushed." Also read: Trump's achievements in 6 months includes India-Pakistan ceasefire, here's what White House said Graham claimed that Putin was attempting to recreate the former Soviet Union by "invading countries that do not belong to him." "Putin wants to take countries that are not his. In the mid-90s, Ukraine gave up 1,700 nuclear weapons with a promise that its sovereignty would be respected by Russia. Putin broke that promise," the Republican added. The US senator's response came amid intensifying US rhetoric against the country perceived to be financially backing Russia during its war against Ukraine. His stand reflected a broader push from Republican leaders urging America's allies and trade partners to economically isolate Moscow. Echoing his tough stance, US President Donald Trump, speaking alongside NATO general secretary Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, warned thatthe US would impose 100 percent "secondary tariffs" on any nation that continues buying oil and gas from Russia, unless President Vladimir Putin agrees to a peace settlement within the next 50 days. Frustrated with Putin, the US president said, "My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night." He emphasised that these tariffs means to bring Putin to the negotiating table. "He's fooled a lot of people," Trump said of Putin, whom he labeled a "tough guy." "He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden - he didn't fool me," Trump said, adding that "We're going to be doing secondary tariffs." What is India's reaction? India reacted to the remarks of NATO chief Rutte on possible sanctions over the trade of India with Russia and cautioned against "double standards". In response, the Foreign Ministry last week stated, "We have seen reports on the subject and are closely following the developments. Let me reiterate that securing the energy needs of our people is understandably an overriding priority for us." Warning of double standards regarding the matter, the Foreign Ministry said "In this endeavour, we are guided by what is on offer in the markets and by prevailing global circumstances. We would particularly caution against any double standards on the matter."

The US senator's response came amid intensifying US rhetoric against the country perceived to be financially backing Russia during its war against Ukraine. His stand reflected a broader push from Republican leaders urging America's allies and trade partners to economically isolate Moscow.

‘We’ll crush your economy if...’: US Senator Lindsey Graham warns India, China and Brazil against buying Russian oil

US retail sales rose 0.6 per cent in June, defying expectations and signalling a modest rebound in consumer spending. The Commerce Department’s report on July 17 highlighted that retail sales, which had been in decline for two consecutive months, reversed course and exceeded forecasts. Economists had predicted only a 0.1 per cent increase for the month. This growth marks a significant improvement after a 0.9 per cent drop in May and a 0.1 per cent dip in April. Year-on-year, June retail sales surged 3.9 per cent, surpassing the 3.6 per cent anticipated by economists, suggesting a continued but cautious consumer appetite.&nbsp;The positive figures provide a glimmer of optimism for an economy that has been caught in the throes of tariff-induced price hikes and trade uncertainty. The strong June report, especially in the face of the ongoing trade war and its inflationary effects, suggests that consumer spending, a key pillar of the US economy, remains resilient.<h2>Auto sales and necessities drive growth</h2>A major contributor to the uptick in retail sales was a 1.2 per cent jump in auto and auto parts sales, a rebound from the previous month’s 3.8 per cent drop. Consumers rushed to make purchases ahead of anticipated tariff-driven price hikes on imported vehicles. However, the growth in auto sales was likely driven by higher prices rather than an increase in volume.Other areas of spending showed mixed results. Sales in clothing and accessories increased by 0.9 per cent, while health and personal care items rose 0.5 per cent. Online retailers also saw a moderate uptick of 0.4 per cent. Yet, spending in electronics, appliances, and furniture stores dipped, reflecting the strain of higher costs tied to the ongoing tariffs. In particular, items heavily reliant on imports, such as electronics, showed signs of weakening demand, as price hikes outpaced consumer demand. Despite these hurdles, there are signs that Americans are prioritising essentials, with sales of household goods, groceries, and personal care products continuing to perform well.&nbsp;<h2>Mixed economic signals raise questions</h2>While the retail sales data is encouraging, it comes amid growing concerns about inflation. The US inflation rate rose 2.7 per cent in June, its highest level since February, as tariffs have driven up the costs of everyday goods. President Donald Trump has called on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, but the recent inflation data makes it less likely that the Fed will take such a step in the immediate future.Economists are also keeping a close eye on the job market, which continues to show resilience. Initial claims for unemployment benefits fell to a three-month low in the week ending July 12, reflecting steady job growth. However, fears about trade policy uncertainty and the risk of rising prices could still lead to a pullback in consumer spending later in the year.As the retail landscape braces for the upcoming back-to-school shopping season, which is expected to see a 3.3 per cent increase in spending, the full impact of tariffs and economic uncertainty will likely continue to shape US consumer behaviour in the months ahead. Retailers will have to navigate these shifting dynamics, balancing supply chain challenges and changing demand as they head into the busy autumn shopping period.

The positive US retail sales figures provide a glimmer of optimism for an economy that has been caught in the throes of tariff-induced price hikes and trade uncertainty.

US retail sales rose 0.6 per cent in June, defying expectations and signalling a modest rebound in consumer spending. The Commerce Department’s report on July 17 highlighted that retail sales, which had been in decline for two consecutive months, reversed course and exceeded forecasts. Economists had predicted only a 0.1 per cent increase for the month. This growth marks a significant improvement after a 0.9 per cent drop in May and a 0.1 per cent dip in April. Year-on-year, June retail sales surged 3.9 per cent, surpassing the 3.6 per cent anticipated by economists, suggesting a continued but cautious consumer appetite. The positive figures provide a glimmer of optimism for an economy that has been caught in the throes of tariff-induced price hikes and trade uncertainty. The strong June report, especially in the face of the ongoing trade war and its inflationary effects, suggests that consumer spending, a key pillar of the US economy, remains resilient. Auto sales and necessities drive growth A major contributor to the uptick in retail sales was a 1.2 per cent jump in auto and auto parts sales, a rebound from the previous month’s 3.8 per cent drop. Consumers rushed to make purchases ahead of anticipated tariff-driven price hikes on imported vehicles. However, the growth in auto sales was likely driven by higher prices rather than an increase in volume. Other areas of spending showed mixed results. Sales in clothing and accessories increased by 0.9 per cent, while health and personal care items rose 0.5 per cent. Online retailers also saw a moderate uptick of 0.4 per cent. Yet, spending in electronics, appliances, and furniture stores dipped, reflecting the strain of higher costs tied to the ongoing tariffs. In particular, items heavily reliant on imports, such as electronics, showed signs of weakening demand, as price hikes outpaced consumer demand. Despite these hurdles, there are signs that Americans are prioritising essentials, with sales of household goods, groceries, and personal care products continuing to perform well. Mixed economic signals raise questions While the retail sales data is encouraging, it comes amid growing concerns about inflation. The US inflation rate rose 2.7 per cent in June, its highest level since February, as tariffs have driven up the costs of everyday goods. President Donald Trump has called on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, but the recent inflation data makes it less likely that the Fed will take such a step in the immediate future. Economists are also keeping a close eye on the job market, which continues to show resilience. Initial claims for unemployment benefits fell to a three-month low in the week ending July 12, reflecting steady job growth. However, fears about trade policy uncertainty and the risk of rising prices could still lead to a pullback in consumer spending later in the year. As the retail landscape braces for the upcoming back-to-school shopping season, which is expected to see a 3.3 per cent increase in spending, the full impact of tariffs and economic uncertainty will likely continue to shape US consumer behaviour in the months ahead. Retailers will have to navigate these shifting dynamics, balancing supply chain challenges and changing demand as they head into the busy autumn shopping period.

The positive US retail sales figures provide a glimmer of optimism for an economy that has been caught in the throes of tariff-induced price hikes and trade uncertainty.

US retail sales rebound in June, buoyed by consumer spending resilience

US purchase prices remained unchanged in June, offering a surprise respite for consumers and businesses alike, despite ongoing concerns over the inflationary impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs. The Producer Price Index (PPI), which tracks the prices producers receive for their goods, showed no change from May, while the annual PPI climbed by 2.3 per cent. This marks a slight slowdown from May’s 2.7 per cent increase and suggests that the immediate impact of tariff hikes may not be as pronounced as initially feared.Despite the flat reading on wholesale prices, the ripple effects of tariffs continue to show up in consumer costs. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for June rose 2.7 per cent from a year ago, driven by higher prices for goods such as groceries, household appliances, and vehicles—sectors most directly affected by the trade policies. The discrepancy between the flat PPI and the rising CPI highlights the complex nature of tariffs, with price pressures often taking different forms before reaching consumers.Economists view the PPI as a bellwether for future consumer inflation. The report showed that the stagnation in wholesale prices was largely attributed to a decline in service costs. Notably, wholesale prices for hotel rooms dropped 4.1 per cent, and airline fares fell 2.7 per cent. These drops were offset, however, by rising costs in goods, including a 1.0 per cent surge in household furniture prices and a 0.8 per cent increase in communication equipment, both of which reflect the ongoing tariff-induced price pressures.While the flat PPI offers some relief, it also complicates the Federal Reserve’s next move. The central bank has been under pressure to reduce interest rates to stimulate economic growth, but with tariffs continuing to push up prices in certain sectors, the Fed remains cautious. The latest data on factory production, showing only a slight 0.1 per cent increase in June, suggests that uncertainty in the manufacturing sector is holding back broader economic expansion, particularly as companies remain wary of the trade climate.Looking ahead, economists are forecasting that the PPI may remain relatively stable in the near term, though the potential for higher tariffs starting August 1 could further escalate costs. These concerns are compounded by President Trump’s continued calls for the Fed to cut interest rates, despite the risks that tariff-induced inflation poses to the broader economy.The core measure of producer prices, excluding volatile food and energy costs, also showed no change in June, rising 2.6 per cent year-on-year. This reflects that while tariffs are driving up prices in certain sectors, the broader economy has yet to experience widespread inflationary pressure. Still, with the possibility of additional tariffs looming, the Fed’s decision at its July 29-30 meeting will be closely watched for signs of whether the central bank will take action to counter these emerging price pressures. As tariffs remain a key focus, the outlook for both inflation and economic growth will likely depend on how businesses and consumers adjust to the shifting price landscape in the months ahead.

Economists view the PPI as a bellwether for future consumer inflation. The report showed that the stagnation in wholesale prices was largely attributed to a decline in service costs.

US purchase prices remained unchanged in June, offering a surprise respite for consumers and businesses alike, despite ongoing concerns over the inflationary impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs. The Producer Price Index (PPI), which tracks the prices producers receive for their goods, showed no change from May, while the annual PPI climbed by 2.3 per cent. This marks a slight slowdown from May’s 2.7 per cent increase and suggests that the immediate impact of tariff hikes may not be as pronounced as initially feared. Despite the flat reading on wholesale prices, the ripple effects of tariffs continue to show up in consumer costs. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for June rose 2.7 per cent from a year ago, driven by higher prices for goods such as groceries, household appliances, and vehicles—sectors most directly affected by the trade policies. The discrepancy between the flat PPI and the rising CPI highlights the complex nature of tariffs, with price pressures often taking different forms before reaching consumers. Economists view the PPI as a bellwether for future consumer inflation. The report showed that the stagnation in wholesale prices was largely attributed to a decline in service costs. Notably, wholesale prices for hotel rooms dropped 4.1 per cent, and airline fares fell 2.7 per cent. These drops were offset, however, by rising costs in goods, including a 1.0 per cent surge in household furniture prices and a 0.8 per cent increase in communication equipment, both of which reflect the ongoing tariff-induced price pressures. While the flat PPI offers some relief, it also complicates the Federal Reserve’s next move. The central bank has been under pressure to reduce interest rates to stimulate economic growth, but with tariffs continuing to push up prices in certain sectors, the Fed remains cautious. The latest data on factory production, showing only a slight 0.1 per cent increase in June, suggests that uncertainty in the manufacturing sector is holding back broader economic expansion, particularly as companies remain wary of the trade climate. Looking ahead, economists are forecasting that the PPI may remain relatively stable in the near term, though the potential for higher tariffs starting August 1 could further escalate costs. These concerns are compounded by President Trump’s continued calls for the Fed to cut interest rates, despite the risks that tariff-induced inflation poses to the broader economy. The core measure of producer prices, excluding volatile food and energy costs, also showed no change in June, rising 2.6 per cent year-on-year. This reflects that while tariffs are driving up prices in certain sectors, the broader economy has yet to experience widespread inflationary pressure. Still, with the possibility of additional tariffs looming, the Fed’s decision at its July 29-30 meeting will be closely watched for signs of whether the central bank will take action to counter these emerging price pressures. As tariffs remain a key focus, the outlook for both inflation and economic growth will likely depend on how businesses and consumers adjust to the shifting price landscape in the months ahead.

Economists view the PPI as a bellwether for future consumer inflation. The report showed that the stagnation in wholesale prices was largely attributed to a decline in service costs.

Purchase prices hold steady as tariff concerns persist

An earthquake of magnitude 7.3 jolted the coast of the US state of Alaska on Wednesday. It took place at approximately 12:37 local time (2037 GMT), and the epicenter was found to be 54 miles (87 kilometers) south of the island town of Sand Point. The epicenter of the quake was at a relatively shallow depth of 12.5 miles, the US Geological Survey said.A terrifying video from installed CCTV in the house of a resident in Sand Point, approximately 50 miles from the epicenter, has surfaced on social media, showing the house and parked car shaking violently.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">We got this incredible footage of today&#39;s earthquake from a resident in Sand Point, about 50 miles from the epicenter. We are grateful to those who shared their experiences -- it allows others to understand what an earthquake is like, and be better prepared. We are also grateful… <a href="https://t.co/5tkqcbgp9Y">pic.twitter.com/5tkqcbgp9Y</a>&mdash; Alaska Earthquake Center (@AKearthquake) <a href="https://twitter.com/AKearthquake/status/1945645927726825682?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 17, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Following the earthquake, officials initially issued a tsunami warning for South Alaska and the Alaska Peninsula but later revoked the tsunami advisory and then completely withdrew it. "The Tsunami Advisory is cancelled for the coastal areas of South Alaska and the Alaska Peninsula," the National Tsunami Warning Center (NTWC) said in a message issued about two hours after the earthquake, AFP reported.The US Geological Survey confirmed that the initial quake was followed by a cluster of over a dozen aftershocks, the largest measuring 5.2 in magnitude. Meanwhile, the National Tsunami Warning Center (NTWC) clarified that the tsunami warning and advisory were issued only for areas along the Alaskan coast, with areas further afield unaffected.NTWC added that a tsunami with a maximum height of 0.2 feet (6.1 centimeters) was witnessed at Sand Point. In response, the center directed residents in the affected zone to remain conscious of hazards. "Do not re-occupy hazard zones until local emergency officials indicate it is safe to do so," the NTWC said.The US state of Alaska is located along the seismically active Pacific Ring of Fire. In March 1964, the remote US state was hit by a 9.2-magnitude earthquake, the strongest ever recorded in North America, which devastated the city of Anchorage and slammed the Gulf of Alaska, the US west coast, and Hawaii, killing scores and damaging infrastructure.&nbsp;

The US state of Alaska was hit by an earthquake of magnitude 7.3 with its epicenter located about 54 miles (87 kilometers) south of the island town of Sand Point. The shallow depth of the epicenter was 12.5 miles.

An earthquake of magnitude 7.3 jolted the coast of the US state of Alaska on Wednesday. It took place at approximately 12:37 local time (2037 GMT), and the epicenter was found to be 54 miles (87 kilometers) south of the island town of Sand Point. The epicenter of the quake was at a relatively shallow depth of 12.5 miles, the US Geological Survey said. A terrifying video from installed CCTV in the house of a resident in Sand Point, approximately 50 miles from the epicenter, has surfaced on social media, showing the house and parked car shaking violently.

The US state of Alaska was hit by an earthquake of magnitude 7.3 with its epicenter located about 54 miles (87 kilometers) south of the island town of Sand Point. The shallow depth of the epicenter was 12.5 miles.

Powerful 7.3 magnitude earthquake hits US' Alaska: Video shows house, cars shaking violently - Watch

After flash flood warnings and a state of emergency were declared in New York City and New Jersey on Monday due to heavy rainfall, as announced by the New Jersey governor, several videos and photos emerged on social media showing severe street flooding. As visuals of submerged homes and cars being swept away by floodwaters began circulating online, internet users started mocking the situation by drawing comparisons of New York City with Gurugram.&nbsp;One of the users in a post on social media platform X said, “THIS IS NOT #Gurugram, THIS IS NEW-JERSEY., The Administration’s response planning and standards would not be the same as Gurgaon. Heavy flooding due to torrential rainfall in NJ, USA (14.07.2025) Nature is a big force; temporary flooding can happen in the best-planned city, too. #GurugramRains Not taking away the fact that our administration has not performed up to mark.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">THIS IS NOT <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Gurugram?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Gurugram</a>, THIS IS NEW-JERSEY., The Administration&#39;s response planning and standards would not be the same as Gurgaon. Heavy flooding due to torrential rainfall in NJ, USA 🇺🇸 (14.07.2025) Nature is a big force; temporary flooding can happen in the best-planned… <a href="https://t.co/OA5y19RTHs">pic.twitter.com/OA5y19RTHs</a>&mdash; Raman Malik🇮🇳 (मोदी का परिवार) (@ramanmalik) <a href="https://twitter.com/ramanmalik/status/1944984278757970356?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 15, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In a post on X, the Paytm founder also uploaded a video of the NYC flood with a caption, "Not Gurugram but NYC."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Not Gurugram but NYC. <a href="https://t.co/SJDO5P5yFD">pic.twitter.com/SJDO5P5yFD</a>&mdash; Vijay Shekhar Sharma (@vijayshekhar) <a href="https://twitter.com/vijayshekhar/status/1945042651243536651?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 15, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Commenting on the post of the Paytm founder, a user said, “1: NYC apparently had more than 200mm of rain 2: Gurugram had about 133mm of rain From what I’ve read, the severity of flooding in Gurugram is generally worse for lesser rainfall. Great city, except when it rains! Though both cities face flooding frequently.”&nbsp; &nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">True. However: 1: NYC apparently had more than 200mm of rain 2: Gurugram had about 133mm of rain From what I&#39;ve read, the severity of flooding in Gurugram is generally worse for lesser rainfall. Great city, except when it rains! Though both cities face flooding frequently. 🤷‍♂️ <a href="https://t.co/FLZF0EDHJd">https://t.co/FLZF0EDHJd</a>&mdash; Nikhil Shahane (@Bingeljell) <a href="https://twitter.com/Bingeljell/status/1945075690195259496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 15, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;“Water rushing into a posh Gurgaon Apartment. Such is the state of drainage. Oh wait it’s New York,” another user said.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Water rushing into a posh Gurgaon Apartment. Such is the state of drainage. Oh wait it&#39;s New York <a href="https://t.co/rNG0jlAxYm">pic.twitter.com/rNG0jlAxYm</a>&mdash; Gabbar (@GabbbarSingh) <a href="https://twitter.com/GabbbarSingh/status/1433305743248089088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 2, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The next user added, “We always make fun of Bharat in various cities like Mumbai , Delhi during rainy seasons when it floods.. Now see what happens in USA a Developed Nation New York City emergency officials have issued a travel advisory as heavy rain and flooding happens."&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">We always make fun of Bharat in various cities like Mumbai , Delhi during rainy seasons when it floods.. Now see what happens in USA a Developed Nation New York City emergency officials have issued a travel advisory as heavy rain and flooding happens<a href="https://t.co/93j7szns0V">https://t.co/93j7szns0V</a> <a href="https://t.co/gC4VO1Bb9b">pic.twitter.com/gC4VO1Bb9b</a>&mdash; AstroCounselKK 🇮🇳 (@AstroCounselKK) <a href="https://twitter.com/AstroCounselKK/status/1707778202180149579?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 29, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Meanwhile, officials reported on Tuesday that two people in New Jersey were killed after their vehicle was consumed in floodwaters during a storm that moved across the U.S. Northeast overnight. &nbsp;

Several social media users mocked the posted footage of the flooded streets of New Jersey, drawing comparisons with Gurugram. The clip showed the submerged homes and cars being swept away by floodwaters.

After flash flood warnings and a state of emergency were declared in New York City and New Jersey on Monday due to heavy rainfall, as announced by the New Jersey governor, several videos and photos emerged on social media showing severe street flooding. As visuals of submerged homes and cars being swept away by floodwaters began circulating online, internet users started mocking the situation by drawing comparisons of New York City with Gurugram. One of the users in a post on social media platform X said, “THIS IS NOT #Gurugram, THIS IS NEW-JERSEY., The Administration’s response planning and standards would not be the same as Gurgaon. Heavy flooding due to torrential rainfall in NJ, USA (14.07.2025) Nature is a big force; temporary flooding can happen in the best-planned city, too. #GurugramRains Not taking away the fact that our administration has not performed up to mark.”

Several social media users mocked the posted footage of the flooded streets of New Jersey, drawing comparisons with Gurugram. The clip showed the submerged homes and cars being swept away by floodwaters.

‘This is not Gurugram, this is New Jersey!’: Netizens troll flooded streets of US

The New Jersey has announced a state emergency after heavy rain lashed multiple areas of US Northeast on Monday, which has triggered flash flood warnings across New York City. After the heavy rain, water raised in the city resulting in the disruption of roads, airports, and public transport, according to NBC News. Meanwhile, the National Weather Service (NWS) issued flash flood warnings for across the New York City. And, several videos of the flood in the New Jersey surfaced showing flooding on streets along with floating of cars.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/six-died-and-nearly-80-000-displaced-in-severe-flood-in-china-1751013484231">Six died and nearly 80,000 displaced in severe flood as China braces for second tropical cyclone in two weeks</a>The state emergency in the New Jersey was announced by governor Phil Murphy following flash flooding and high levels of rainfall in parts of the state. He requested the residents to stay indoors and avoid unnecessary travel. In a short notice the basement apartment, residents were asked to prepare to evacuate in the New York.“If you live in a basement apartment, stay alert. Flash flooding can happen with little warning, including overnight,” New York City emergency management said in a post on X. “Keep a phone, flashlight, and Go Bag nearby. Be ready to move to higher ground.”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Here&#39;s what radar looks like currently. Flooding is New York City’s top public health threat, and it strikes fast. Flash floods can turn streets into rivers and fill basements within minutes. These floods often come with little or no warning and can be deadly. Basement… <a href="https://t.co/A5bvdyVWR3">pic.twitter.com/A5bvdyVWR3</a>&mdash; NYC Emergency Management (@nycemergencymgt) <a href="https://twitter.com/nycemergencymgt/status/1944868294995202198?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 14, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h3>Airport, rail, and roads services disrupted</h3>Staten Island, a county in the New York has reached nearly 1.7 inches after heavy rain and Manhattan’s Chelsea neighbourhood by 7:30 pm reached 1.5 inches. Following this, the NWS warned that rain could up to the rate of 2 to 3 inches per hour, which can go upto 6 inches in total. As a result, several mode of transportation were disrupted, like LaGuardia and Newark Liberty airports reported delays and disruptions, while John F. Kennedy Airport warned of potential issues. Similarly, substantial flooding disrupted a section of major roads in the state.In addition, flooding also hit subway stations in New York's Queens county, and train lines were severely disrupted, as well as the Staten Island Railway suspended service in both directions in the southern part of the borough.According to a report in New York Times, the cause of heavy rainfall in the part of the state was a slow-moving storm system combined with unusually humid and hot air. Joseph Wegman from the weather department underscored that “one storm will follow another, after another,” and most of the areas are unable to absorb sudden inflow of much water in a short period. &nbsp;

After flash flooding and high levels of rainfall hit US's New Jersey, governor Phil Murphy announced state emergency. Following the emergency he requested the residents to stay indoors and avoid unnecessary travel. 

The New Jersey has announced a state emergency after heavy rain lashed multiple areas of US Northeast on Monday, which has triggered flash flood warnings across New York City. After the heavy rain, water raised in the city resulting in the disruption of roads, airports, and public transport, according to NBC News. Meanwhile, the National Weather Service (NWS) issued flash flood warnings for across the New York City. And, several videos of the flood in the New Jersey surfaced showing flooding on streets along with floating of cars. Also read: Six died and nearly 80,000 displaced in severe flood as China braces for second tropical cyclone in two weeks The state emergency in the New Jersey was announced by governor Phil Murphy following flash flooding and high levels of rainfall in parts of the state. He requested the residents to stay indoors and avoid unnecessary travel. In a short notice the basement apartment, residents were asked to prepare to evacuate in the New York. “If you live in a basement apartment, stay alert. Flash flooding can happen with little warning, including overnight,” New York City emergency management said in a post on X. “Keep a phone, flashlight, and Go Bag nearby. Be ready to move to higher ground.”

After flash flooding and high levels of rainfall hit US's New Jersey, governor Phil Murphy announced state emergency. Following the emergency he requested the residents to stay indoors and avoid unnecessary travel.&nbsp;

New Jersey declares state emergency after flash floods lash US Northeast—Details here

Four people were injured in a gun firing during a class reunion in Chattanooga, Tennessee, US on Saturday. The gunfire erupted at the centre just after 3:00 PM local time on Saturday. Following the incident, the Chattanooga Police Department (CPD) responded at 6900 Ty Hi Drive, and officials are yet to issue a statement, according to a report in Local 3 News.&nbsp;All those injured were rushed to an area hospital for treatment of non-life-threatening injuries, according to multiple reports. In the meantime, police are on the hunt for the shooter and have yet to release any details of the suspect. They also assured that no threat to the public exists, reported the Chattanooga Times Free Press.&nbsp;“Everybody was just having a good time.” “Then, all the sudden, shots just started going everywhere. Little kids and babies and everything were on the ground. It was bad, real bad.”, eyewitness Jeoff Herman told Local News 3 in Chattanooga. Reunion attendees reported rushing away from the scene as chaos ensued, and others dropped to the ground to take cover.&nbsp;The police have also not released any statement on the motive behind the violence. The incident occurred at the Tyner Community Centre, a red-brick facility surrounded by trees, which acts as a hub for community rentals, events, and programs.&nbsp;Chattanooga has struggled with recurring incidents of gun violence in recent years. A mass shooting in 2022 on McCallie Avenue resulted in three deaths and 14 injuries. In 2024, another shooting occurred near ChattTown Skate Park. In March 2025, a 44-year-old man was fatally shot on Youngstown Road, followed by a homicide in June 2025 on Lindsay Avenue, which led to an arrest.<h3>Shooting at Jackson, Tennessee</h3>On the night of May 25, 2025, a shooting at Kate Campbell Park in northeast Jackson, Tennessee, left seven individuals, including minors, injured, according to the Jackson Police Department, ABC News reported.&nbsp;One victim was critically wounded and hospitalised, two others remained in stable condition, while the remaining four received medical attention and were released. Authorities are continuing their investigation to identify those responsible.

The incident occurred at the Tyner Community Centre, a red-brick facility surrounded by trees, which acts as a hub for community rentals, events, and programs. The motive behind the massive shooting is still unknown.

Four people were injured in a gun firing during a class reunion in Chattanooga, Tennessee, US on Saturday. The gunfire erupted at the centre just after 3:00 PM local time on Saturday. Following the incident, the Chattanooga Police Department (CPD) responded at 6900 Ty Hi Drive, and officials are yet to issue a statement, according to a report in Local 3 News. All those injured were rushed to an area hospital for treatment of non-life-threatening injuries, according to multiple reports. In the meantime, police are on the hunt for the shooter and have yet to release any details of the suspect. They also assured that no threat to the public exists, reported the Chattanooga Times Free Press. “Everybody was just having a good time.” “Then, all the sudden, shots just started going everywhere. Little kids and babies and everything were on the ground. It was bad, real bad.”, eyewitness Jeoff Herman told Local News 3 in Chattanooga. Reunion attendees reported rushing away from the scene as chaos ensued, and others dropped to the ground to take cover. The police have also not released any statement on the motive behind the violence. The incident occurred at the Tyner Community Centre, a red-brick facility surrounded by trees, which acts as a hub for community rentals, events, and programs. Chattanooga has struggled with recurring incidents of gun violence in recent years. A mass shooting in 2022 on McCallie Avenue resulted in three deaths and 14 injuries. In 2024, another shooting occurred near ChattTown Skate Park. In March 2025, a 44-year-old man was fatally shot on Youngstown Road, followed by a homicide in June 2025 on Lindsay Avenue, which led to an arrest. Shooting at Jackson, Tennessee On the night of May 25, 2025, a shooting at Kate Campbell Park in northeast Jackson, Tennessee, left seven individuals, including minors, injured, according to the Jackson Police Department, ABC News reported. One victim was critically wounded and hospitalised, two others remained in stable condition, while the remaining four received medical attention and were released. Authorities are continuing their investigation to identify those responsible.

The incident occurred at the Tyner Community Centre, a red-brick facility surrounded by trees, which acts as a hub for community rentals, events, and programs. The motive behind the massive shooting is still unknown.

Mass gunfire erupts during class reunion in US's Tennessee, 4 injured — Details here

The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits unexpectedly fell last week, hitting a seven-week low and suggesting that employers are still reluctant to let go of workers even as broader signs point to a cooling labour market. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 5,000 to a seasonally adjusted 227,000 for the week ending July 5, the Labor Department reported on July 10. The figure surprised economists, who had forecast 235,000 claims, and marked the fourth consecutive weekly decline. The data was impacted by the July 4th holiday, which tends to cause fluctuations in reporting.Non-seasonally adjusted claims rose by over 10,000, largely due to expected auto industry retooling shutdowns in states like Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. However, the increase was smaller than anticipated, suggesting that temporary layoffs were less severe than usual for this time of year. Labor Department seasonal models had forecast a spike of nearly 15,000 claims. Although jobless claims remain one of the timeliest indicators of labour market health, economists warn that the broader picture reflects a fragile balance between low layoffs and weak hiring.&nbsp;<h2>Hiring slows as tariff uncertainty looms</h2>While layoffs remain low, the hiring trend continues to soften. June’s jobs report showed the unemployment rate edged down to 4.1 per cent, but primarily due to a shrinking labour force participation rate, which hit a 2.5-year low. Although 147,000 jobs were added, gains were concentrated in a few sectors, underscoring limited opportunities for job seekers.The median duration of unemployment rose to 10.1 weeks in June from 9.5 weeks in May, reflecting growing difficulty for the unemployed to find new positions. Continuing claims, a proxy for hiring activity, rose by 10,000 to 1.965 million—the highest level since November 2021.Economists also point to US President Donald Trump’s newly announced tariff increases as a growing source of business uncertainty, which could suppress hiring further. More than 20 trade partners have been notified of new duties, including a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports, and further levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals are expected.While the Federal Reserve held rates steady last month, markets are pricing in potential rate cuts beginning in September, especially if the impact of tariffs weighs on inflation and economic growth.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 5,000 to a seasonally adjusted 227,000 for the week ending July 5, the Labor Department reported on July 10.

The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits unexpectedly fell last week, hitting a seven-week low and suggesting that employers are still reluctant to let go of workers even as broader signs point to a cooling labour market. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 5,000 to a seasonally adjusted 227,000 for the week ending July 5, the Labor Department reported on July 10. The figure surprised economists, who had forecast 235,000 claims, and marked the fourth consecutive weekly decline. The data was impacted by the July 4th holiday, which tends to cause fluctuations in reporting. Non-seasonally adjusted claims rose by over 10,000, largely due to expected auto industry retooling shutdowns in states like Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. However, the increase was smaller than anticipated, suggesting that temporary layoffs were less severe than usual for this time of year. Labor Department seasonal models had forecast a spike of nearly 15,000 claims. Although jobless claims remain one of the timeliest indicators of labour market health, economists warn that the broader picture reflects a fragile balance between low layoffs and weak hiring. Hiring slows as tariff uncertainty looms While layoffs remain low, the hiring trend continues to soften. June’s jobs report showed the unemployment rate edged down to 4.1 per cent, but primarily due to a shrinking labour force participation rate, which hit a 2.5-year low. Although 147,000 jobs were added, gains were concentrated in a few sectors, underscoring limited opportunities for job seekers. The median duration of unemployment rose to 10.1 weeks in June from 9.5 weeks in May, reflecting growing difficulty for the unemployed to find new positions. Continuing claims, a proxy for hiring activity, rose by 10,000 to 1.965 million—the highest level since November 2021. Economists also point to US President Donald Trump’s newly announced tariff increases as a growing source of business uncertainty, which could suppress hiring further. More than 20 trade partners have been notified of new duties, including a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports, and further levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals are expected. While the Federal Reserve held rates steady last month, markets are pricing in potential rate cuts beginning in September, especially if the impact of tariffs weighs on inflation and economic growth.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 5,000 to a seasonally adjusted 227,000 for the week ending July 5, the Labor Department reported on July 10.

US jobless claims fall to seven-week low despite slowing labour market

Thirty-one workers were rescued after the collapse of one industrial tunnel in Wilmington, Los Angeles, United States, on Wednesday, said the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD). The collapse occurred deep within the Los Angeles Effluent Outfall Tunnel, the $630.5 million Clearwater project, which is currently under construction. The collapse of the tunnel was reported just before 8 pm near the intersection of South Figueroa Street and Q Street.According to a report in the New York Times, Fire Department personnel were sent to the accident site, including specially trained search and rescue teams, equipped to handle confined-space tunnel rescues. The incident occurred in the Clearwater Project, which is designed to carry treated, clean wastewater from the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant to the ocean.L.A. County Supervisor Janice Hahn confirmed that all 31 workers were safely rescued, with no visible injuries reported. To escape the collapsing section of the tunnel, the workers had to climb over a 12- to 15-foot-high mound of soil.<h3>What went wrong in Tunnel?</h3>Before the structure partially collapsed, workers were operating a tunnel boring machine, which is used to excavate tunnels. Fire officials stated that when the loose dirt fell, it was more than 15 feet high, according to a report by NBC Los Angeles."It was determined that a structure failure of the tunnel line occurred approximately 5 to 6 miles in..." said LAFD chief Villanueva. "The workers had to climb through debris. They had to make themselves out through, and then rescuers actually came to them to assist them out."Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass hailed the effort of LAFD in a post on X, stating that over 100 LAFD responders have been deployed, including Urban Search and Rescue teams and acted immediately to respond to this emergency.“I just spoke with many of the workers who were trapped,” Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass shared in a post on X (formerly known as Twitter). “Thank you to all of our brave first responders who acted immediately. You are L.A.'s true heroes.”“The City of Los Angeles has mobilised resources to the tunnel collapse in Wilmington. More than 100 LAFD responders have been deployed, including Urban Search and Rescue teams. Thank you to all of those who are acting immediately to respond to this emergency,” Bass said in another post.The incident occurred nearly 6 miles inside the tunnel, making the rescue operation extremely challenging. The collapse happened at a location deep underground, about 450 feet below the surface, with only one access point located miles away, as per the HT report.The tunnel, being constructed by Flatiron Dragados, spans 7 miles in length and 18 feet in diameter. It's part of L.A. County’s Clearwater Project, aimed at upgrading the ageing wastewater infrastructure, which dates back to 1937 and 1958.&nbsp;

The incident occurred in the Clearwater Project, which is designed to carry treated, clean wastewater from the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant to the ocean. And, the collapse of the tunnel was reported just before 8 pm near the intersection of South Figueroa Street and Q Street.

Thirty-one workers were rescued after the collapse of one industrial tunnel in Wilmington, Los Angeles, United States, on Wednesday, said the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD). The collapse occurred deep within the Los Angeles Effluent Outfall Tunnel, the $630.5 million Clearwater project, which is currently under construction. The collapse of the tunnel was reported just before 8 pm near the intersection of South Figueroa Street and Q Street. According to a report in the New York Times, Fire Department personnel were sent to the accident site, including specially trained search and rescue teams, equipped to handle confined-space tunnel rescues. The incident occurred in the Clearwater Project, which is designed to carry treated, clean wastewater from the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant to the ocean. L.A. County Supervisor Janice Hahn confirmed that all 31 workers were safely rescued, with no visible injuries reported. To escape the collapsing section of the tunnel, the workers had to climb over a 12- to 15-foot-high mound of soil. What went wrong in Tunnel? Before the structure partially collapsed, workers were operating a tunnel boring machine, which is used to excavate tunnels. Fire officials stated that when the loose dirt fell, it was more than 15 feet high, according to a report by NBC Los Angeles. "It was determined that a structure failure of the tunnel line occurred approximately 5 to 6 miles in..." said LAFD chief Villanueva. "The workers had to climb through debris. They had to make themselves out through, and then rescuers actually came to them to assist them out." Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass hailed the effort of LAFD in a post on X, stating that over 100 LAFD responders have been deployed, including Urban Search and Rescue teams and acted immediately to respond to this emergency. “I just spoke with many of the workers who were trapped,” Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass shared in a post on X (formerly known as Twitter). “Thank you to all of our brave first responders who acted immediately. You are L.A.'s true heroes.” “The City of Los Angeles has mobilised resources to the tunnel collapse in Wilmington. More than 100 LAFD responders have been deployed, including Urban Search and Rescue teams. Thank you to all of those who are acting immediately to respond to this emergency,” Bass said in another post. The incident occurred nearly 6 miles inside the tunnel, making the rescue operation extremely challenging. The collapse happened at a location deep underground, about 450 feet below the surface, with only one access point located miles away, as per the HT report. The tunnel, being constructed by Flatiron Dragados, spans 7 miles in length and 18 feet in diameter. It's part of L.A. County’s Clearwater Project, aimed at upgrading the ageing wastewater infrastructure, which dates back to 1937 and 1958.

The incident occurred in the Clearwater Project, which is designed to carry treated, clean wastewater from the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant to the ocean. And, the collapse of the tunnel was reported just before 8 pm near the intersection of South Figueroa Street and Q Street.

Wilmington tunnel with 31 workers collapses in Los Angeles — Here’s what happened next

A heated confrontation broke out at a Popeyes restaurant in Kansas, United States, after a customer grew angry over a staff member reportedly gave a compliment to his wife by calling her "beautiful." The incident escalated quickly when the man angrily told the employee, "This is not India, you're in the States." The incident captured on the phone surfaced on social media with mixed reactions from the netizens.In the viral video, the heated argument shows the man took offence at the compliment made by the employee, demanding to know why he made such a comment. When the staff member admitted to it and apologised, the customer snapped, “This is not India or something, dude. You're in the States.”Meanwhile in the background of the video people are heard easing the tense. However, the man continues to argue, adding that speaking about a woman's appearance, especially without knowing her, is completely disrespectful. "It's never okay to speak to a woman you don't know and talk about her looks," he insisted."There's a difference in respect but not difference in generational," he added. He further added, "Don't call my wife beautiful, this is completely insane. Don't call anyone like this."In response, another employee in orange uniforms was seen attempting to defuse the situation, saying, "You’ve made your point, man. They’ve learned their lesson,” one said. Another employee added, “We apologise. We’re saying sorry, what else can I say?” attempting to defuse the confrontation.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Customer goes off on Popeyes employees for calling his wife beautiful. <a href="https://t.co/nxsABk3I5d">pic.twitter.com/nxsABk3I5d</a>&mdash; The Art Of Dialogue (@ArtOfDialogue_) <a href="https://twitter.com/ArtOfDialogue_/status/1942022384006918283?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 7, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h3>Netizens react to viral video</h3>After the video surfaced on the internet, social media users shared their mixed opinions. One of the netizens said, "Wokeness normalises everything. Why do employees need to comment on someone's look ? Unknown people complimenting me on my gold chain or watch is creepy as hell. Here its someone's partner. Commenting or complimenting on a customers appearances is not professional. Most Women feed on attention so they enjoy it. But these subtle infringements in long term disturb the harmony of a couple."The next said, "He was simply protecting his wife. He wanted to let the guy know that he shouldn’t be disrespecting his wife when his wife is trying to get a sandwich, even though he was taking it a bit further than necessary."Another mocked, "It’s a fucking compliment! Maybe she is ugly and now the poor husband has to deal with her new attitude.""I will never understand people like that. Someone calling his wife beautiful is a HUGE compliment," another also said.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The heated argument in the viral video shows the man took offence at the compliment made by the employee, demanding to know why he made such a comment. When the staff member admitted to it and apologised, the customer snapped, “This is not India or something, dude. You're in the States.”

A heated confrontation broke out at a Popeyes restaurant in Kansas, United States, after a customer grew angry over a staff member reportedly gave a compliment to his wife by calling her "beautiful." The incident escalated quickly when the man angrily told the employee, "This is not India, you're in the States." The incident captured on the phone surfaced on social media with mixed reactions from the netizens. In the viral video, the heated argument shows the man took offence at the compliment made by the employee, demanding to know why he made such a comment. When the staff member admitted to it and apologised, the customer snapped, “This is not India or something, dude. You're in the States.” Meanwhile in the background of the video people are heard easing the tense. However, the man continues to argue, adding that speaking about a woman's appearance, especially without knowing her, is completely disrespectful. "It's never okay to speak to a woman you don't know and talk about her looks," he insisted. "There's a difference in respect but not difference in generational," he added. He further added, "Don't call my wife beautiful, this is completely insane. Don't call anyone like this." In response, another employee in orange uniforms was seen attempting to defuse the situation, saying, "You’ve made your point, man. They’ve learned their lesson,” one said. Another employee added, “We apologise. We’re saying sorry, what else can I say?” attempting to defuse the confrontation.

The heated argument in the viral video shows the man took offence at the compliment made by the employee, demanding to know why he made such a comment. When the staff member admitted to it and apologised, the customer snapped, “This is not India or something, dude. You're in the States.”

‘This Is Not F****** India, Dude’: US man gives racist outburst to restaurant employee for calling his wife ‘beautiful’

us-news

Us News, News on Us News, stories on Us News, articles on Us News, Us News stories at Wion, Us News news, Us News latest news

us news

'False statue of a false Hindu God': Alexander Duncan's remark on Hanuman idol in Texas triggers backlash

An earthquake of 4.3 magnitude centered in Berkeley jolts US Bay Area

Charlie Kirk's shooter Tyler Robinson 'feared' being shot by police

Donald Trump lists India, Pakistan among 23 ‘major drug-producing' nations

US Fed announces first rate cut in nine months

Where is Hurricane Erin now? Storm threatens with flooding in US' Carolina

Why did the Fed scrap the dedicated crypto oversight unit?

US factory output stalls in July amid tariff pressures

Will the US give Ukraine security guarantees? Donald Trump's 'NATO' reply

Trump administration plans 300,000 federal job cuts in 2025

'As deadly as war’: Iran says US sanctions kill 500,000 people a year

US budget deficit surges 20% in July despite record tariff revenues

White House ups federal law enforcement at tourist hot spots in Washington, DC

Can Trump order a new census? US president pushes to leave out ‘illegal' undocumented immigrants

Drones to deliver your coffee? Trump administration pushes for wider use of UAVs

Washington plane collision: Altimeter error led to helicopter-jet crash

US inflation rises in June as tariffs fuel price increases

'Dad will always be villain': Daughter mourns as father gets life term in US

Russia unfazed by Trump's ultimatum – 'Every threat is a step towards war'

Devastating legacy of Musk led DOGE: More than 20% NASA employees quit

Trump open to talks with Kim — but only after ‘FULL DENUCLEARISATION'

US Senator Lindsey warns India, China and Brazil against buying Russian oil

US retail sales rebound in June, buoyed by consumer spending resilience

Purchase prices hold steady as tariff concerns persist

7.3 magnitude earthquake hits US' Alaska: Video shows house, cars shaking—Watch

‘This isn't Gurugram, this is New Jersey!’: Netizens troll flooded streets of US