US President Donald Trump on Monday nominated his former personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, to serve as attorney general on a permanent basis, setting the stage for what could be a contentious confirmation process in the Senate.&nbsp;Blanche, 51, has been serving as acting attorney general since Pam Bondi left the position in April. During his tenure, he has overseen several indictments targeting individuals viewed as political opponents of Trump.&nbsp;The White House confirmed on Monday that Blanche's nomination had been formally sent to the Senate. The move follows Trump's remarks at a White House Rose Garden dinner last week, where he informed guests of his intention to nominate Blanche for the role.<h2>Senate approval remains uncertain</h2>Despite the nomination, it remains unclear whether Blanche can secure enough support in the Senate, which must approve senior administration appointments, including the attorney general.&nbsp;His nomination comes at a politically sensitive time for the Trump administration. Republicans have recently faced a series of setbacks as Trump's approval ratings have come under pressure over economic concerns and the Iran war, with midterm elections approaching in five months.&nbsp;Lawmakers have also raised concerns over Blanche's support for a proposed $1.8 billion fund that was intended to compensate Trump allies who faced prosecution during former President Joe Biden's administration. The administration later abandoned the proposal.&nbsp;The initiative drew criticism from both Republicans and Democrats. Among the most vocal critics was Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bibi-you-will-be-on-your-own-trump-s-stern-warning-to-netanyahu-against-renewed-iran-conflict-1780954671256">'Bibi, you will be on your own': Trump's stern warning to Netanyahu against renewed Iran conflict</a>&nbsp;"Donald Trump has been engaged in the most corrupt enterprise in the history of the Presidency. Todd Blanche apparently has not noticed," Durbin said.&nbsp;Before joining the administration, Blanche was a member of Trump's legal team during the New York criminal trial involving allegations of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.&nbsp;He also represented Trump in two federal cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith involving allegations related to classified documents and efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.&nbsp;Blanche's nomination comes months after Trump removed former attorney general Pam Bondi following tensions over her handling of Justice Department files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Blanche's nomination follows the departure of former attorney general Pam Bondi, whom Trump removed after disagreements over her handling of Justice Department records linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

US President Donald Trump on Monday nominated his former personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, to serve as attorney general on a permanent basis, setting the stage for what could be a contentious confirmation process in the Senate. Blanche, 51, has been serving as acting attorney general since Pam Bondi left the position in April. During his tenure, he has overseen several indictments targeting individuals viewed as political opponents of Trump. The White House confirmed on Monday that Blanche's nomination had been formally sent to the Senate. The move follows Trump's remarks at a White House Rose Garden dinner last week, where he informed guests of his intention to nominate Blanche for the role. Senate approval remains uncertain Despite the nomination, it remains unclear whether Blanche can secure enough support in the Senate, which must approve senior administration appointments, including the attorney general. His nomination comes at a politically sensitive time for the Trump administration. Republicans have recently faced a series of setbacks as Trump's approval ratings have come under pressure over economic concerns and the Iran war, with midterm elections approaching in five months. Lawmakers have also raised concerns over Blanche's support for a proposed $1.8 billion fund that was intended to compensate Trump allies who faced prosecution during former President Joe Biden's administration. The administration later abandoned the proposal. The initiative drew criticism from both Republicans and Democrats. Among the most vocal critics was Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Also Read: 'Bibi, you will be on your own': Trump's stern warning to Netanyahu against renewed Iran conflict "Donald Trump has been engaged in the most corrupt enterprise in the history of the Presidency. Todd Blanche apparently has not noticed," Durbin said. Before joining the administration, Blanche was a member of Trump's legal team during the New York criminal trial involving allegations of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. He also represented Trump in two federal cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith involving allegations related to classified documents and efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Blanche's nomination comes months after Trump removed former attorney general Pam Bondi following tensions over her handling of Justice Department files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Blanche's nomination follows the departure of former attorney general Pam Bondi, whom Trump removed after disagreements over her handling of Justice Department records linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump nominates his former lawyer Todd Blanche as US attorney general, Senate fight looms

Former US Attorney General Pam Bondi has said that Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Justice Department, was the official responsible for overseeing the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, according to newly released congressional testimony. The remarks were made during a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee last month, transcripts of which were made public on Thursday (Jun 4).<h2>What did Bondi say?</h2>During the questioning, Bondi repeatedly sought to distance herself from the Justice Department's handling of the highly sensitive Epstein records, a matter that has generated controversy throughout Trump's second term.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-strikes-again-attacks-another-journalist-with-bizarre-comment-hatred-in-her-eyes-1780554898613">Trump strikes again, attacks another journalist with bizarre comment: 'Hatred in her eyes'</a>"He was in charge of the process and the entire release of the Epstein files," Bondi told lawmakers when asked about the department's compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. According to her testimony, the Justice Department has already released roughly three million documents, while another three million records remain under review or unreleased.Her comments place Blanche at the centre of one of the Trump administration's most politically charged controversies just as he prepares for what is expected to be a difficult Senate confirmation process. Democrats have already pointed to Bondi's testimony as evidence that Blanche should personally explain his role in the handling of the Epstein records.<h2>Is DoJ withholding Epstein files?</h2>Bondi insisted the department was not withholding material, arguing that the remaining files largely consist of duplicates or documents protected by legal privilege.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/whose-cocaine-was-it-hunter-biden-sarcastic-response-to-white-house-narcotics-accusation-goes-viral-i-d-never-forget-my-drugs-joe-biden-west-wing-1780562403574">Whose cocaine was it? Hunter Biden sarcastic response to White House narcotics accusation goes viral: 'I'd never forget my drugs'</a>Bondi also addressed criticism over her widely discussed 2025 television interview, in which she claimed the alleged Epstein "client list" was sitting on her desk. The statement fuelled speculation that explosive new disclosures were imminent. However, she later clarified that she had been referring to the broader Epstein case file and not to any specific client list. During her testimony, Bondi again insisted her comments had been misunderstood.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi told lawmakers that Todd Blanche oversaw the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, placing Trump's DOJ nominee at the centre of a growing controversy. Here's all you need to know.

Former US Attorney General Pam Bondi has said that Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Justice Department, was the official responsible for overseeing the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, according to newly released congressional testimony. The remarks were made during a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee last month, transcripts of which were made public on Thursday (Jun 4). What did Bondi say? During the questioning, Bondi repeatedly sought to distance herself from the Justice Department's handling of the highly sensitive Epstein records, a matter that has generated controversy throughout Trump's second term. Also read | Trump strikes again, attacks another journalist with bizarre comment: 'Hatred in her eyes' "He was in charge of the process and the entire release of the Epstein files," Bondi told lawmakers when asked about the department's compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. According to her testimony, the Justice Department has already released roughly three million documents, while another three million records remain under review or unreleased. Her comments place Blanche at the centre of one of the Trump administration's most politically charged controversies just as he prepares for what is expected to be a difficult Senate confirmation process. Democrats have already pointed to Bondi's testimony as evidence that Blanche should personally explain his role in the handling of the Epstein records. Is DoJ withholding Epstein files? Bondi insisted the department was not withholding material, arguing that the remaining files largely consist of duplicates or documents protected by legal privilege. Also read | Whose cocaine was it? Hunter Biden sarcastic response to White House narcotics accusation goes viral: 'I'd never forget my drugs' Bondi also addressed criticism over her widely discussed 2025 television interview, in which she claimed the alleged Epstein "client list" was sitting on her desk. The statement fuelled speculation that explosive new disclosures were imminent. However, she later clarified that she had been referring to the broader Epstein case file and not to any specific client list. During her testimony, Bondi again insisted her comments had been misunderstood.

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi told lawmakers that Todd Blanche oversaw the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, placing Trump's DOJ nominee at the centre of a growing controversy. Here's all you need to know.

'He was in charge': Pam Bondi REVEALS who was really behind the botched Epstein files release

A tense exchange unfolded as Pam Bondi faced tough questions over the handling and release of the Epstein files. Defending the Trump administration's actions, Bondi insisted that full transparency was maintained throughout the process and pointed to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's oversight. However, she declined to comment on Donald Trump's specific role, drawing further scrutiny. 

Epstein Files: Pam Bondi Defends Transparency, Declines Questions on Trump's Involvement

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi defended her oversight of the Jeffrey Epstein document release during a closed-door congressional interview on Friday. Bondi, who was dismissed by President Donald Trump in early April, maintained that the Justice Department acted with transparency while noting that she delegated the specific review process to her then-deputy, Todd Blanche.


Epstein Files: Bondi Says Full Transparency Was Maintained During Files' Release

Former US Attorney General Pam Bondi while testifying Friday before the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein files said that the Justice Department made “redaction errors” in its release of records related to Epstein.&nbsp;“To the best of my knowledge, the Department produced everything required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act,” Bondi said in a statement released just ahead of her closed-door interview.&nbsp;DOJ “demonstrated an unprecedented commitment to transparency” in its release of the case documents, she further said.<h2>&nbsp;“Failed to personally oversee the process”</h2>&nbsp;As reported by various US media houses, the ex-AG while defending the department said the agency released all files required to release under the law but she failed to personally oversee the process herself and delegated oversight of the process to then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.&nbsp;She said that the Justice Department made “redaction errors” in its release of records related to Jeffrey Epstein, reported NBC.&nbsp;“There were redaction errors,” her opening remarks said. “But since day one of this process, this Department has been committed to accountability and transparency. Our stance has always been that the Department stands ready to review any potential evidence of criminal activity related to Epstein and his associates and would pursue appropriate investigative or prosecutorial action wherever the facts and law warrant,' Bondi was quoted as saying by NBC.&nbsp;Bondi's interview will take place behind closed doors and will be transcribed. It is also expected to be released to the public but will not be recorded and will not be under oath, said the committee.Only after the full transcript of the interview is released publicly will one get to know what exactly &nbsp;Bondi told lawmakers.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The ex-AG Pam Bondi while defending the department said the agency released all files required to release under the law but she failed to personally oversee the process and delegated oversight of the process.

Former US Attorney General Pam Bondi while testifying Friday before the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein files said that the Justice Department made “redaction errors” in its release of records related to Epstein. “To the best of my knowledge, the Department produced everything required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act,” Bondi said in a statement released just ahead of her closed-door interview. DOJ “demonstrated an unprecedented commitment to transparency” in its release of the case documents, she further said. “Failed to personally oversee the process” As reported by various US media houses, the ex-AG while defending the department said the agency released all files required to release under the law but she failed to personally oversee the process herself and delegated oversight of the process to then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. She said that the Justice Department made “redaction errors” in its release of records related to Jeffrey Epstein, reported NBC. “There were redaction errors,” her opening remarks said. “But since day one of this process, this Department has been committed to accountability and transparency. Our stance has always been that the Department stands ready to review any potential evidence of criminal activity related to Epstein and his associates and would pursue appropriate investigative or prosecutorial action wherever the facts and law warrant,' Bondi was quoted as saying by NBC. Bondi's interview will take place behind closed doors and will be transcribed. It is also expected to be released to the public but will not be recorded and will not be under oath, said the committee. Only after the full transcript of the interview is released publicly will one get to know what exactly Bondi told lawmakers.

The ex-AG Pam Bondi while defending the department said the agency released all files required to release under the law but she failed to personally oversee the process and delegated oversight of the process.

Pam Bondi defends Epstein files release but accepts ‘redaction errors’ were made

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi will appear before the House Oversight Committee almost four months after releasing millions of files related to Jeffrey Epstein. She will be questioned behind closed doors by bipartisan lawmakers and professional investigative staff from the House Oversight Committee. As Bondi arrived at Capitol Hill on Friday morning, she made no comments to reporters while gathering, Epstein survivors yelled, "tell the truth". The development comes as Pam Bondi disclosed that she was suffering from thyroid cancer.The key aspects of the appearance is the its not a formal deposition but a transcribed interview, an arrangement criticised by the democrats who argue it violates the spirit of the subpoena. Oversight Chairman James Comer downgraded the terms after Bondi resigned as Attorney General in April 2026.&nbsp;Attorney General Pam Bondi had been under fire for her handling of the release of the Epstein files, and members of Congress of both parties have said that under her tenure, the DOJ failed to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. About 3 million pages of heavily redacted documents were published without any clarification, which is less than half of the available documents.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-refiles-wsj-defamation-lawsuit-jeffrey-epstein-1779968984852">Trump revives explosive $10 billion lawsuit against WSJ over Epstein story</a>“She violated a congressional subpoena demanding the files, and she repeatedly, over her entire term of service as the AG, engaged in manufactured lies to the American people over the Epstein case. In addition to that, based on what I’ve seen in the unredacted files, there are dozens of potentially prosecutable crimes and cases in the Epstein files, and they have not pursued a single investigation,” said Rep Melanie Stansbury.&nbsp;Bondi and Attorney General Todd Blanche met the House Oversight Committee in March, but Democrats walked out, accusing Pam Bondi of sidestepping her responsibility. Bondi was to be deposed as per the subpoena, but she resigned, following which the DOJ said that she no longer needed to testify.&nbsp;But now, as the format is changed, this setup allows Bondi to refuse to answer certain questions without a formal legal justification. She will be accompanied by Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Guynn during the testimony to "to assist the Committee in understanding the Department's role in implementing and complying with the Epstein Files Transparency Act during her tenure."&nbsp;&nbsp;

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Oversight Committee for closed-door questioning over her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and alleged failures to comply with transparency demands.

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi will appear before the House Oversight Committee almost four months after releasing millions of files related to Jeffrey Epstein. She will be questioned behind closed doors by bipartisan lawmakers and professional investigative staff from the House Oversight Committee. As Bondi arrived at Capitol Hill on Friday morning, she made no comments to reporters while gathering, Epstein survivors yelled, "tell the truth". The development comes as Pam Bondi disclosed that she was suffering from thyroid cancer. The key aspects of the appearance is the its not a formal deposition but a transcribed interview, an arrangement criticised by the democrats who argue it violates the spirit of the subpoena. Oversight Chairman James Comer downgraded the terms after Bondi resigned as Attorney General in April 2026. Attorney General Pam Bondi had been under fire for her handling of the release of the Epstein files, and members of Congress of both parties have said that under her tenure, the DOJ failed to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. About 3 million pages of heavily redacted documents were published without any clarification, which is less than half of the available documents. Also Read: Trump revives explosive $10 billion lawsuit against WSJ over Epstein story “She violated a congressional subpoena demanding the files, and she repeatedly, over her entire term of service as the AG, engaged in manufactured lies to the American people over the Epstein case. In addition to that, based on what I’ve seen in the unredacted files, there are dozens of potentially prosecutable crimes and cases in the Epstein files, and they have not pursued a single investigation,” said Rep Melanie Stansbury. Bondi and Attorney General Todd Blanche met the House Oversight Committee in March, but Democrats walked out, accusing Pam Bondi of sidestepping her responsibility. Bondi was to be deposed as per the subpoena, but she resigned, following which the DOJ said that she no longer needed to testify. But now, as the format is changed, this setup allows Bondi to refuse to answer certain questions without a formal legal justification. She will be accompanied by Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Guynn during the testimony to "to assist the Committee in understanding the Department's role in implementing and complying with the Epstein Files Transparency Act during her tenure."

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Oversight Committee for closed-door questioning over her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and alleged failures to comply with transparency demands.

House Oversight Committee questions Pam Bondi over Epstein document release

In a fresh political shake-up in Washington, the U.S. Labour Secretary has stepped down following reports of alleged misconduct involving inappropriate personal texts sent to female staff. The controversy has sparked serious questions about workplace conduct at the highest levels of government. This marks yet another high-profile resignation in recent weeks, adding to mounting pressure on the administration. The Deputy Labour Secretary is now expected to take over as acting chief.


US Labour Secretary Resigns: Another Resignation After Kristi Noem And Pam Bondi 

Pam Bondi, the former attorney general dismissed by President Trump last week, will not appear next week for a scheduled deposition with the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a statement on Wednesday, the committee said it would coordinate with Bondi to arrange a new date for her testimony, which is required under a subpoena issued last month. The subpoena was pushed forward by a bipartisan group, compelling the panel’s Republican chairman, Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, to act.&nbsp;Comer had directed Bondi to testify on April 14 regarding the Justice Department’s investigation into Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in 2019 while facing sex trafficking charges, and the department’s handling of related investigative materials. However, a committee spokeswoman said the Justice Department indicated that Bondi would not appear because she is no longer serving as attorney general. Her missteps in handling the Epstein investigation reportedly played a key role in President Trump’s decision to remove her from the position. The Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-s-parliament-speaker-ghalibaf-accuses-us-of-violating-ceasefire-araghchi-warns-world-is-watching-1775685001924">Iran's parliament speaker Ghalibaf accuses US of violating ceasefire; Araghchi warns 'world is watching'</a>&nbsp;The committee is now expected to discuss next steps, including rescheduling, with Bondi’s personal legal team. Representative Robert Garcia of California, the panel’s top Democrat, emphasized that the subpoena remains valid despite her dismissal. “Now that Pam Bondi has been fired, she’s trying to get out of her legal obligation to testify,” Mr. Garcia said in a statement. He added that “if she defies the subpoena, we will begin contempt charges in the Congress.”Even before her removal, lawmakers were concerned that &nbsp;Bondi might attempt to avoid the deposition. In a rare move, five Republicans joined Democrats to force the subpoena over Comer’s objections, marking a significant rebuke from members of the president’s own party.&nbsp;While Comer publicly stated he would honor the subpoena and Bondi claimed she intended to “follow the law,” she never firmly committed to appearing on April 14. Reports suggest she and Comer had been quietly working to avoid the deposition. Following her dismissal, Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who introduced the motion to subpoena Bondi, said the legal obligation still stands.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-ceasefire-trump-threatened-civilisational-destruction-iran-stood-firm-1775676592138/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-ceasefire-trump-threatened-civilisational-destruction-iran-stood-firm-1775676592138/embed</a>&nbsp;“Pam Bondi cannot escape accountability simply because she no longer holds the office of attorney general,” Mace said in a statement. “Our motion to subpoena Pam Bondi, which was passed by the Oversight Committee, was for Bondi by name, not by title.” Annie and Maria Farmer, among the earliest known accusers of Epstein, criticized the delay in securing testimony. “Survivors have waited nearly three decades for answers,” they said in a statement. “How much longer must we wait?”&nbsp;The committee’s investigation began last year with a subpoena for Justice Department files and has since expanded to include materials from Epstein’s estate, as well as interviews and depositions from individuals connected to him.Previously, Comer also subpoenaed Bill and Hillary Clinton, leading to a prolonged standoff before both agreed to testify after the committee moved toward contempt proceedings.&nbsp;Looking ahead, several closed-door interviews are scheduled. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is expected to appear voluntarily on May 6, while Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is slated to testify on June 10, according to sources familiar with the plans.

Epstein Files: Ousted AG Pam Bondi will not testify before House Oversight committee

Pam Bondi, the former attorney general dismissed by President Trump last week, will not appear next week for a scheduled deposition with the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a statement on Wednesday, the committee said it would coordinate with Bondi to arrange a new date for her testimony, which is required under a subpoena issued last month. The subpoena was pushed forward by a bipartisan group, compelling the panel’s Republican chairman, Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, to act. Comer had directed Bondi to testify on April 14 regarding the Justice Department’s investigation into Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in 2019 while facing sex trafficking charges, and the department’s handling of related investigative materials. However, a committee spokeswoman said the Justice Department indicated that Bondi would not appear because she is no longer serving as attorney general. Her missteps in handling the Epstein investigation reportedly played a key role in President Trump’s decision to remove her from the position. The Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment. Also Read: Iran's parliament speaker Ghalibaf accuses US of violating ceasefire; Araghchi warns 'world is watching' The committee is now expected to discuss next steps, including rescheduling, with Bondi’s personal legal team. Representative Robert Garcia of California, the panel’s top Democrat, emphasized that the subpoena remains valid despite her dismissal. “Now that Pam Bondi has been fired, she’s trying to get out of her legal obligation to testify,” Mr. Garcia said in a statement. He added that “if she defies the subpoena, we will begin contempt charges in the Congress.” Even before her removal, lawmakers were concerned that Bondi might attempt to avoid the deposition. In a rare move, five Republicans joined Democrats to force the subpoena over Comer’s objections, marking a significant rebuke from members of the president’s own party. While Comer publicly stated he would honor the subpoena and Bondi claimed she intended to “follow the law,” she never firmly committed to appearing on April 14. Reports suggest she and Comer had been quietly working to avoid the deposition. Following her dismissal, Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who introduced the motion to subpoena Bondi, said the legal obligation still stands. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-ceasefire-trump-threatened-civilisational-destruction-iran-stood-firm-1775676592138/embed “Pam Bondi cannot escape accountability simply because she no longer holds the office of attorney general,” Mace said in a statement. “Our motion to subpoena Pam Bondi, which was passed by the Oversight Committee, was for Bondi by name, not by title.” Annie and Maria Farmer, among the earliest known accusers of Epstein, criticized the delay in securing testimony. “Survivors have waited nearly three decades for answers,” they said in a statement. “How much longer must we wait?” The committee’s investigation began last year with a subpoena for Justice Department files and has since expanded to include materials from Epstein’s estate, as well as interviews and depositions from individuals connected to him. Previously, Comer also subpoenaed Bill and Hillary Clinton, leading to a prolonged standoff before both agreed to testify after the committee moved toward contempt proceedings. Looking ahead, several closed-door interviews are scheduled. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is expected to appear voluntarily on May 6, while Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is slated to testify on June 10, according to sources familiar with the plans.

Pam Bondi to skip a subpoenaed deposition in the Epstein probe, prompting lawmakers to warn of contempt as the Oversight Committee plans next steps

US President Donald Trump had been weighing a broader Cabinet shake‑up following the removal of Attorney General Pam Bondi, as he grew increasingly frustrated with the political fallout from the ongoing war with Iran, five people familiar with internal White House discussions told Reuters. The potential reshuffle comes amid rising gas prices, declining approval ratings, and growing anxiety among Republicans ahead of the November midterm elections. Allies said Trump’s televised address on Wednesday, intended to convey control and confidence over the war, had 'fallen flat', reinforcing calls for changes in messaging or personnel. One White House official told Reuters: “A shake-up to show action is not a bad thing, is it?”&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-gives-iran-48-hour-ultimatum-warns-hell-will-rain-down-if-no-deal-reached-1775312869999">Trump gives Iran 48‑hour ultimatum, warns ‘hell will rain down’ if no deal reached</a><h2>Officials Under Scrutiny</h2> The potential shake-up follows Bondi’s ouster this week and the earlier departure of homeland security secretary Kristi Noem last month. Although no cabinet member was confirmed as certain to be dismissed, multiple officials were reportedly vulnerable. Sources cited Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick as possible targets. Gabbard had clashed with the administration’s military stance, while Lutnick faced renewed scrutiny for his past ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Despite internal discussions, White House spokesman Davis Ingle said Trump maintained ‘total confidence’ in both Gabbard and Lutnick. Ingle highlighted the administration’s policy achievements, including Gabbard’s role in ending the Maduro regime and Lutnick’s contribution to trade deals.&nbsp;<h2>Targeted Churn Likely</h2>ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-massive-war-crime-what-do-iran-s-president-and-us-experts-say-about-trump-s-threat-to-strike-tehran-back-to-the-stone-ages-1775221431536">'Massive WAR CRIME’: What do Iran’s President &amp; US experts say about Trump’s threat to strike Tehran ‘back to the Stone Ages’?</a> According to a Reuters source, Trump preferred a ‘targeted churn’ over a sweeping overhaul, wary of perceptions of instability caused by frequent staff changes during his first term. An Ipsos survey showed that &nbsp;only 36 per cent Americans approve of Trump's ​overall job performance, showing significant public disapproval of the Iran war, the administration faced pressure to demonstrate responsiveness, whether through personnel adjustments or messaging shifts. Additionally, 60 per cent of respondents disapproved of the ​US-Israeli decision to start the conflict.&nbsp;Whether Trump would act remained uncertain. "Let's just say, based on what I have heard, Bondi is not the last one," another White House official was quoted saying. Allies argued that targeted changes could bolster public perception, while excessive reshuffling risked reinforcing narratives of chaos within the White House.

The potential shake-up follows Bondi’s ouster this week and the earlier departure of homeland security secretary Kristi Noem last month. Although no cabinet member was confirmed as certain to be dismissed, multiple officials were reportedly vulnerable.

US President Donald Trump had been weighing a broader Cabinet shake‑up following the removal of Attorney General Pam Bondi, as he grew increasingly frustrated with the political fallout from the ongoing war with Iran, five people familiar with internal White House discussions told Reuters. The potential reshuffle comes amid rising gas prices, declining approval ratings, and growing anxiety among Republicans ahead of the November midterm elections. Allies said Trump’s televised address on Wednesday, intended to convey control and confidence over the war, had 'fallen flat', reinforcing calls for changes in messaging or personnel. One White House official told Reuters: “A shake-up to show action is not a bad thing, is it?” ALSO READ: Trump gives Iran 48‑hour ultimatum, warns ‘hell will rain down’ if no deal reached Officials Under Scrutiny The potential shake-up follows Bondi’s ouster this week and the earlier departure of homeland security secretary Kristi Noem last month. Although no cabinet member was confirmed as certain to be dismissed, multiple officials were reportedly vulnerable. Sources cited Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick as possible targets. Gabbard had clashed with the administration’s military stance, while Lutnick faced renewed scrutiny for his past ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Despite internal discussions, White House spokesman Davis Ingle said Trump maintained ‘total confidence’ in both Gabbard and Lutnick. Ingle highlighted the administration’s policy achievements, including Gabbard’s role in ending the Maduro regime and Lutnick’s contribution to trade deals. Targeted Churn Likely ALSO READ: 'Massive WAR CRIME’: What do Iran’s President & US experts say about Trump’s threat to strike Tehran ‘back to the Stone Ages’? According to a Reuters source, Trump preferred a ‘targeted churn’ over a sweeping overhaul, wary of perceptions of instability caused by frequent staff changes during his first term. An Ipsos survey showed that only 36 per cent Americans approve of Trump's overall job performance, showing significant public disapproval of the Iran war, the administration faced pressure to demonstrate responsiveness, whether through personnel adjustments or messaging shifts. Additionally, 60 per cent of respondents disapproved of the US-Israeli decision to start the conflict. Whether Trump would act remained uncertain. "Let's just say, based on what I have heard, Bondi is not the last one," another White House official was quoted saying. Allies argued that targeted changes could bolster public perception, while excessive reshuffling risked reinforcing narratives of chaos within the White House.

The potential shake-up follows Bondi’s ouster this week and the earlier departure of homeland security secretary Kristi Noem last month. Although no cabinet member was confirmed as certain to be dismissed, multiple officials were reportedly vulnerable.

Bondi out, who’s next? Trump eyes wider Cabinet shake‑up as midterms loom and Iran war backlash deepens: Report

After US President Donald Trump fired US Attorney General Pam Bondi, a claim on social media was widely circulated that stated the official portrait of Bondi was thrown into a rubbish bin at the Department of Justice (DOJ). The claim was swiftly rejected by the department, which described the allegation as “fake news”.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-s-152-million-plan-to-revive-alcatraz-everything-about-the-notorious-prison-1775261046444">Trump’s $152 million plan to revive Alcatraz – Everything about notorious prison</a>&nbsp;The claim originated from a viral image showing a framed portrait of Bondi placed upside down inside a wire trash can, purportedly within a DOJ office in Washington. The photograph was shared extensively online, fuelling speculation that the portrait had been discarded shortly after her exit from office.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-are-in-war-trump-s-first-reaction-after-us-jets-downed-says-won-t-derail-iran-talks-1775255879104">'We are in war': Trump after US jets downed, says 'won't derail Iran talks'</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Fake News vs. Real News <a href="https://t.co/rMBJ9cGf5T">pic.twitter.com/rMBJ9cGf5T</a>&mdash; DOJ Rapid Response (@DOJRR47) <a href="https://twitter.com/DOJRR47/status/2040134476986982781?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 3, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

However, the DOJ pushed back against the narrative. In a post from an official-linked account, the department dismissed the claim as inaccurate.&nbsp;Before the controversy, Bondi’s portrait had been displayed on a wall alongside images of US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance. The image has not been independently verified, and no credible evidence has emerged to substantiate the claim that the portrait was disposed of by the department. Bondi, a long-time ally of Trump, had served as Attorney General amid a tenure that drew scrutiny, including criticism over her handling of Justice Department files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-carry-on-patriots-us-def-secy-hegseth-lifts-suspension-for-army-pilots-after-2-ah-64-apache-helicopters-fly-by-at-kid-rock-s-estate-1775024195671">‘Carry on, patriots’: US Def Secy Hegseth lifts suspension for Army pilots after 2 AH-64 Apache helicopters fly-by at Kid Rock’s estate</a><h2>Trump considering replacing Tulsi Gabbard as intelligence chief?</h2>US President Donald Trump has privately sounded out members of his cabinet in recent weeks on whether to replace Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, according to two people familiar with the matter.The discussions reportedly stem from Trump’s frustration over Gabbard’s handling of a former deputy who had challenged the administration’s justification for a potential conflict with Iran. Sources said the intelligence chief was seen as having shielded the official, deepening tensions within the administration.&nbsp;It remains unclear whether Trump will ultimately move to remove Gabbard. There is no obvious successor at present, and some advisers have cautioned that creating a high-profile vacancy without a replacement could trigger avoidable political complications.&nbsp;

After Donald Trump fired US Attorney General Pam Bondi, the DOJ dismissed a viral claim that her official portrait was dumped in a bin, calling it fake news.

After US President Donald Trump fired US Attorney General Pam Bondi, a claim on social media was widely circulated that stated the official portrait of Bondi was thrown into a rubbish bin at the Department of Justice (DOJ). The claim was swiftly rejected by the department, which described the allegation as “fake news”. Also read: Trump’s $152 million plan to revive Alcatraz – Everything about notorious prison The claim originated from a viral image showing a framed portrait of Bondi placed upside down inside a wire trash can, purportedly within a DOJ office in Washington. The photograph was shared extensively online, fuelling speculation that the portrait had been discarded shortly after her exit from office. Also read: 'We are in war': Trump after US jets downed, says 'won't derail Iran talks'

After Donald Trump fired US Attorney General Pam Bondi, the DOJ dismissed a viral claim that her official portrait was dumped in a bin, calling it fake news.

FACT CHECK: Pam Bondi’s DOJ portrait ‘dumped in bin’? Here’s what department said

Donald Trump’s inner circle is facing a major shake-up. Attorney General Pam Bondi is out, and more exits could follow. From Tulsi Gabbard to Kristi Noem, several key figures are under pressure as tensions rise within the administration. Is this the beginning of a larger purge within Trump’s team?


Trump's Trust Deficit Leading to Power Shift Among Loyalists?

Pam Bondi has been removed as US Attorney General by President Donald Trump, but she is still legally bound to testify before Congress later this month on the Epstein files investigation. A subpoena requiring her appearance on April 14 remains active. Unless something dramatic happens, she will have to face questions from Congress over the Department of Justice’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case when she was AG. Bondi’s testimony about her time leading the Justice Department would be central to the investigation into cases involving late financier Jefffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring.&nbsp;<h2>Subpoena issued in person’s name, not post: Why Pam Bondi will need to testify</h2>Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has taken over as acting AG after Bondi was fired by Trump on Thursday (Apr 2). But congressional subpoena was issued to Bondi by name. This means it was a subpoena to the person, not to the office of the attorney general. Legal and congressional procedure allows committees to compel former officials to testify about actions taken during their tenure.The subpoena issued to Bondi on March 17 by the House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer remains in full force.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-fires-attorney-general-pam-bondi-after-criticism-over-epstein-files-releases-1775150955840">Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi after criticism over Epstein files releases</a><h2>No cancellation of Bondi deposition before Congress panel</h2>At the time of writing this, there has been no cancellation or rescheduling of the April 14 deposition for Bondi. At the closed-door deposition before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Bondi will most likely be grilled on the release and redactions of the Epstein files.The focus is likely to be on Bondi’s official actions in exposing the sex trafficking network of Epstein, his former associate Ghislaine Maxwell, and other aides.Congress is investigating the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein case, related proceedings involving Maxwell, the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death, and DOJ compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.Decisions taken under Bondi on the Epstein file release could also come up for questioning, including redactions and internal reviews. She might face questions on broader failures or gaps in combating sex-trafficking networks, and potential ethical violations involving public officials.The committee said Bondi was directly responsible for overseeing how Epstein-related files were collected, reviewed, and released under federal law.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-kash-patel-could-be-fired-today-former-fbi-agent-s-big-claim-after-trump-fires-pam-bondi-1775178603074">'Kash Patel could be fired today': Former FBI agent's BIG claim after Trump fires Pam Bondi</a><h2>Bipartisan agreement that Bondi must comply</h2>Representative Robert Garcia, the committee’s top Democrat, said Bondi remains legally obligated to appear under oath. Representative Nancy Mace, a Republican who backed the subpoena, said it still stands because it was issued to Bondi by name. Other lawmakers including Ro Khanna and Dave Min have seconded that position.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/-trump-removes-pam-bondi-as-attorney-general-1775184294402/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/-trump-removes-pam-bondi-as-attorney-general-1775184294402/embed</a><h2>What if Bondi refuses to appear before Congress?</h2>If Bondi fails to comply with the subpoena, the committee could move to enforce it through contempt of Congress proceedings.Committee chairman Comer has said that it will evaluate next steps if necessary, but has not indicated any change to the 14 April schedule.Bipartisan pressure is mounting on her. It would be fair to say that the ghost of Epstein is haunting her. &nbsp;

Though she was fired US Attorney General, Pam Bondi will most likely have to testify on April 14 before Congress on DOJ handling of Epstein files. She will face questions on the compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and actions on sex-trafficking rings including that of Epstein.

Pam Bondi has been removed as US Attorney General by President Donald Trump, but she is still legally bound to testify before Congress later this month on the Epstein files investigation. A subpoena requiring her appearance on April 14 remains active. Unless something dramatic happens, she will have to face questions from Congress over the Department of Justice’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case when she was AG. Bondi’s testimony about her time leading the Justice Department would be central to the investigation into cases involving late financier Jefffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. Subpoena issued in person’s name, not post: Why Pam Bondi will need to testify Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has taken over as acting AG after Bondi was fired by Trump on Thursday (Apr 2). But congressional subpoena was issued to Bondi by name. This means it was a subpoena to the person, not to the office of the attorney general. Legal and congressional procedure allows committees to compel former officials to testify about actions taken during their tenure. The subpoena issued to Bondi on March 17 by the House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer remains in full force. Also read: Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi after criticism over Epstein files releases No cancellation of Bondi deposition before Congress panel At the time of writing this, there has been no cancellation or rescheduling of the April 14 deposition for Bondi. At the closed-door deposition before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Bondi will most likely be grilled on the release and redactions of the Epstein files. The focus is likely to be on Bondi’s official actions in exposing the sex trafficking network of Epstein, his former associate Ghislaine Maxwell, and other aides. Congress is investigating the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein case, related proceedings involving Maxwell, the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death, and DOJ compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Decisions taken under Bondi on the Epstein file release could also come up for questioning, including redactions and internal reviews. She might face questions on broader failures or gaps in combating sex-trafficking networks, and potential ethical violations involving public officials. The committee said Bondi was directly responsible for overseeing how Epstein-related files were collected, reviewed, and released under federal law. Also read: 'Kash Patel could be fired today': Former FBI agent's BIG claim after Trump fires Pam Bondi Bipartisan agreement that Bondi must comply Representative Robert Garcia, the committee’s top Democrat, said Bondi remains legally obligated to appear under oath. Representative Nancy Mace, a Republican who backed the subpoena, said it still stands because it was issued to Bondi by name. Other lawmakers including Ro Khanna and Dave Min have seconded that position. https://www.wionews.com/videos/-trump-removes-pam-bondi-as-attorney-general-1775184294402/embed What if Bondi refuses to appear before Congress? If Bondi fails to comply with the subpoena, the committee could move to enforce it through contempt of Congress proceedings. Committee chairman Comer has said that it will evaluate next steps if necessary, but has not indicated any change to the 14 April schedule. Bipartisan pressure is mounting on her. It would be fair to say that the ghost of Epstein is haunting her.

Though she was fired US Attorney General, Pam Bondi will most likely have to testify on April 14 before Congress on DOJ handling of Epstein files. She will face questions on the compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and actions on sex-trafficking rings including that of Epstein.

It’s not over for Pam Bondi? Fired AG still faces 14 April congressional grilling over Epstein files

After President Donald Trump fired Pam Bondi as Attorney General, reports surfaced that Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel could be next. Former FBI agent Kyle Seraphin told far-right host Alex Jones, citing sources, that “There is a decent possibility that Kash Patel is fired today, and there is a total reshuffle. The question is why, and I guess that Trump wants to make it look like it's his idea and not while he is under pressure.”<h2>Kash Patel under pressure?</h2>Three former FBI agents have filed a class-action lawsuit this week, seeking to be reinstated after claiming they were illegally punished for their role in investigating Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The lawsuit adds to a growing list of legal challenges linked to a personnel purge led by Kash Patel, which over the past year has resulted in the dismissal of dozens of agents. Many were removed either for their involvement in Trump-related investigations or because they were deemed insufficiently loyal to the Republican president’s agenda.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-trump-considering-replacing-tulsi-gabbard-as-intelligence-chief-here-s-what-we-know-1775174686524">Is Trump considering replacing Tulsi Gabbard as intelligence chief? Here's what we know</a>&nbsp;The three agents, Michelle Ball, Jamie Garman, and Blaire Toleman, were fired last October and November in what they describe as a ‘retribution campaign’ targeting them for their investigative work on Trump. Each had between eight and 14 years of 'exemplary and unblemished' service and had expected to spend the remainder of their careers at the FBI, but were abruptly dismissed without cause or the opportunity to respond, according to the lawsuit.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/republicans-move-to-end-longest-partial-shutdown-with-special-measure-in-congress-1775146505441/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/republicans-move-to-end-longest-partial-shutdown-with-special-measure-in-congress-1775146505441/embed</a>&nbsp;Several media reports also suggest that the US President Donald Trump has considered United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin as a potential replacement for Pam Bondi and has also discussed firing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

'Kash Patel could be fired today': Former FBI agent's BIG claim after Trump fires Pam Bondi

After President Donald Trump fired Pam Bondi as Attorney General, reports surfaced that Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel could be next. Former FBI agent Kyle Seraphin told far-right host Alex Jones, citing sources, that “There is a decent possibility that Kash Patel is fired today, and there is a total reshuffle. The question is why, and I guess that Trump wants to make it look like it's his idea and not while he is under pressure.” Kash Patel under pressure? Three former FBI agents have filed a class-action lawsuit this week, seeking to be reinstated after claiming they were illegally punished for their role in investigating Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The lawsuit adds to a growing list of legal challenges linked to a personnel purge led by Kash Patel, which over the past year has resulted in the dismissal of dozens of agents. Many were removed either for their involvement in Trump-related investigations or because they were deemed insufficiently loyal to the Republican president’s agenda. Also Read: Is Trump considering replacing Tulsi Gabbard as intelligence chief? Here's what we know The three agents, Michelle Ball, Jamie Garman, and Blaire Toleman, were fired last October and November in what they describe as a ‘retribution campaign’ targeting them for their investigative work on Trump. Each had between eight and 14 years of 'exemplary and unblemished' service and had expected to spend the remainder of their careers at the FBI, but were abruptly dismissed without cause or the opportunity to respond, according to the lawsuit. https://www.wionews.com/videos/republicans-move-to-end-longest-partial-shutdown-with-special-measure-in-congress-1775146505441/embed Several media reports also suggest that the US President Donald Trump has considered United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin as a potential replacement for Pam Bondi and has also discussed firing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

Trump fires Pam Bondi; Kash Patel may be next. Ex-FBI agent claims “total reshuffle.” Fired agents sue over alleged retaliation and political purge

President Donald Trump has removed Attorney General Pam Bondi from her position, citing growing dissatisfaction with her performance, including her handling of investigative files tied to late financier Jeffrey Epstein. In a social media statement, Trump described Bondi as a "Great American Patriot and a loyal friend" and said she would transition to the private sector. “Pam Bondi is a Great American Patriot and a loyal friend, who faithfully served as my Attorney General over the past year. Pam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown in Crime across our Country, with Murders plummeting to their lowest level since 1900,” Trump wrote.&nbsp;He announced that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche would temporarily lead the Justice Department. According to Fox News, Bondi was informed of her dismissal in the Oval Office shortly before Trump’s April 1 address. Blanche later responded on X, thanking Bondi for her service and pledging to continue “doing everything in our power to keep America safe.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-fires-attorney-general-pam-bondi-after-criticism-over-epstein-files-releases-1775150955840">Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi after criticism over Epstein files releases</a><h2>Who is Todd Blanche?</h2>Todd Blanche is a senior legal figure and longtime Trump ally. After Trump’s 2024 election win, Blanche was nominated as Deputy Attorney General under Bondi and confirmed by the Senate in March 2025 with a 52–46 vote. A former federal prosecutor, Blanche has worked at major law firms such as WilmerHale and Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/-date-my-mate-nights-go-viral-as-singles-use-powerpoint-to-find-love-1775151886715/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/-date-my-mate-nights-go-viral-as-singles-use-powerpoint-to-find-love-1775151886715/embed</a>&nbsp;He also spent over eight years at the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, serving as co-chief of its White Plains division. In 2019, Blanche led the defense for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in a New York fraud case involving alleged bank fraud exceeding $1 million. While those charges were dismissed, Manafort was later sentenced to 7.5 years in prison in separate federal cases.

Who is Todd Blanche? Interim DOJ head after Trump fires Pam Bondi amid Epstein files scrutiny

President Donald Trump has removed Attorney General Pam Bondi from her position, citing growing dissatisfaction with her performance, including her handling of investigative files tied to late financier Jeffrey Epstein. In a social media statement, Trump described Bondi as a "Great American Patriot and a loyal friend" and said she would transition to the private sector. “Pam Bondi is a Great American Patriot and a loyal friend, who faithfully served as my Attorney General over the past year. Pam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown in Crime across our Country, with Murders plummeting to their lowest level since 1900,” Trump wrote. He announced that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche would temporarily lead the Justice Department. According to Fox News, Bondi was informed of her dismissal in the Oval Office shortly before Trump’s April 1 address. Blanche later responded on X, thanking Bondi for her service and pledging to continue “doing everything in our power to keep America safe.” Also Read: Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi after criticism over Epstein files releases Who is Todd Blanche? Todd Blanche is a senior legal figure and longtime Trump ally. After Trump’s 2024 election win, Blanche was nominated as Deputy Attorney General under Bondi and confirmed by the Senate in March 2025 with a 52–46 vote. A former federal prosecutor, Blanche has worked at major law firms such as WilmerHale and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. https://www.wionews.com/videos/-date-my-mate-nights-go-viral-as-singles-use-powerpoint-to-find-love-1775151886715/embed He also spent over eight years at the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, serving as co-chief of its White Plains division. In 2019, Blanche led the defense for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in a New York fraud case involving alleged bank fraud exceeding $1 million. While those charges were dismissed, Manafort was later sentenced to 7.5 years in prison in separate federal cases.

Trump fires Pam Bondi as Attorney General, appoints loyal deputy Todd Blanche as interim DOJ head amid rising concerns over her performance

In a dramatic move, Donald Trump has removed Attorney General Pam Bondi following growing dissatisfaction over her handling of sensitive cases, including files linked to Jeffrey Epstein. Criticism from allies and lawmakers intensified pressure, turning the issue into a major political flashpoint and raising fresh questions about accountability and justice.


BREAKING: Deputy AG Todd Blanche To Take Over As Interim Attorney General 

President Donald Trump fired Attorney General Pam Bondi after her handling of files related to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein came under criticism, and several investigations of his perceived enemies were thwarted, reported CNN and Fox News. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche will be acting attorney general, and Bondi is expected to be offered a different post in the administration, sources said.&nbsp;Bondi’s firing is Trump’s second removal of a Cabinet official in his second term. He fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in March and replaced her with Markwayne Mullin, a former senator from Oklahoma.White House officials have discussed several names for attorney general, but Lee Zeldin, the Senate-confirmed administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, is the likely replacement, sources said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-world-on-edge-of-wider-war-people-are-already-struggling-says-un-chief-antonio-guterres-1775149940522">‘World on edge of wider war, people are already struggling,’ says UN chief Antonio Guterres</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump confirmed Bondi’s removal and said in a post on Truth Social, “Pam Bondi is a Great American Patriot and a loyal friend, who faithfully served as my Attorney General over the past year. Pam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown in Crime across our Country, with Murders plummeting to their lowest level since 1900. We love Pam, and she will be transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector, to be announced at a date in the near future, and our Deputy Attorney General, and a very talented and respected Legal Mind, Todd Blanche, will step in to serve as Acting Attorney General.”&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-to-join-coalition-of-nations-exploring-ways-to-reopen-strait-of-hormuz-1775136809016">India to join coalition of nations exploring ways to reopen Strait of Hormuz</a><h2>Lawmakers accused Bondi of botching release of Epstein files</h2>&nbsp;&nbsp;Lawmakers of both parties accused Bondi of botching the release of Epstein files. The department of justice released about 3 million pages of documents but left another 2.5 million sealed, saying the remaining records either named women who accused Epstein of abuse, could hurt potential prosecutions, or were protected under legal privileges.Bondi’s critics argued much more should be released.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-foreign-secretary-yvette-cooper-condemns-iran-s-recklessness-says-urgent-need-to-reopen-strait-of-hormuz-1775133637067">UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper condemns Iran’s ‘recklessness’, says ‘urgent need’ to reopen Strait of Hormuz</a>&nbsp;“This is bigger than Watergate,” Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, told Bondi at a February hearing. “This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of it.”When questioned about not prosecuting Epstein's accomplices, Bondi said lawmakers should appreciate that that stock markets were rising under Trump.The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoenaed her to testify on April 14 about the Epstein files.&nbsp;<h2>DoJ was sluggish in investigating Trump’s perceived enemies</h2>&nbsp;The Justice Department was also sluggish in investigating Trump’s perceived enemies. Trump felt frustrated there haven’t been more indictments and arrests of his political adversaries.&nbsp;Trump pressured Bondi on social media to take legal action against New York Attorney General Letitia James, former FBI Director James Comey and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California.James secured a half-billion dollar civil fraud judgment against Trump last year, though the penalty was later thrown out by an appeals court.Schiff led the first House impeachment against Trump over his dealings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.“We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social addressed to Bondi. “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-no-one-told-me-says-bengal-cm-mamata-banerjee-after-sc-rap-on-sir-officers-being-held-hostage-in-malda-1775141683773">‘No one told me,’ says Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee after SC rap on SIR officers being held hostage in Malda</a>&nbsp;But judges dismissed indictments against James and Comey and grand juries refused to pursue new charges. Schiff hasn’t been charged.Grand juries have also refused to indict suspects in investigations from Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney in the District of Columbia. One probe targeted six Democratic lawmakers for encouraging troops to disobey illegal orders.&nbsp;Efforts to investigate Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and six congressional Democrats who posted a video urging military members to defy unlawful orders have also faltered, with a federal judge quashing the subpoenas into Powell and a grand jury unanimously rejecting criminal charges against the lawmakers.

Lawmakers of both parties accused Attorney General Pam Bondi of botching the release of Epstein files. The Department of Justice released about 3 million pages of documents but left another 2.5 million sealed. Bondi’s critics argued much more should be released.

President Donald Trump fired Attorney General Pam Bondi after her handling of files related to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein came under criticism, and several investigations of his perceived enemies were thwarted, reported CNN and Fox News. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche will be acting attorney general, and Bondi is expected to be offered a different post in the administration, sources said. Bondi’s firing is Trump’s second removal of a Cabinet official in his second term. He fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in March and replaced her with Markwayne Mullin, a former senator from Oklahoma. White House officials have discussed several names for attorney general, but Lee Zeldin, the Senate-confirmed administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, is the likely replacement, sources said. Also Read: ‘World on edge of wider war, people are already struggling,’ says UN chief Antonio Guterres Trump confirmed Bondi’s removal and said in a post on Truth Social, “Pam Bondi is a Great American Patriot and a loyal friend, who faithfully served as my Attorney General over the past year. Pam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown in Crime across our Country, with Murders plummeting to their lowest level since 1900. We love Pam, and she will be transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector, to be announced at a date in the near future, and our Deputy Attorney General, and a very talented and respected Legal Mind, Todd Blanche, will step in to serve as Acting Attorney General.”

Lawmakers of both parties accused Attorney General Pam Bondi of botching the release of Epstein files. The Department of Justice released about 3 million pages of documents but left another 2.5 million sealed. Bondi’s critics argued much more should be released.

Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi after criticism over Epstein files releases

BREAKING: Trump Removes Pam Bondi As Attorney General 

In a stunning "red-on-red" political escalation, the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday (Mar 17) formally subpoenaed Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify under oath about the Justice Department’s haphazard release of the notorious Jeffrey Epstein files. Led by a vocal faction of Republicans including Nancy Mace, the committee is demanding answers for what they describe as a "White House cover-up" involving missing video evidence and "haphazard" redactions that exposed victims while protecting powerful associates. As Republicans rejoice over the April 14 deposition date, Bondi, who in February taunted lawmakers over "pizzagate" and other conspiracy theories, now faces a bipartisan firing squad determined to unearth why 3 million pages of the sex trafficker's network remain buried.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pam-bondi-subpoenaed-house-oversight-committee-forces-trump-s-ag-to-testify-on-doj-s-alleged-epstein-files-cover-up-bipartisan-vote-1772688470568">Pam Bondi subpoenaed: House oversight committee to force Trump's AG to testify on DOJ's alleged Epstein files 'cover-up'</a><h2>Why did Republicans Subpoena AG Pam Bondi Over Epstein Files?</h2>The House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed Pam Bondi, the Trump administration's top law enforcement official, to investigate what they describe as a possible mismanagement of the federal probe into paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. She will appear for a closed-door deposition on April 14. This<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pam-bondi-subpoenaed-house-oversight-committee-forces-trump-s-ag-to-testify-on-doj-s-alleged-epstein-files-cover-up-bipartisan-vote-1772688470568"> follows a committee vote earlier this month</a> to compel Bondi's testimony. At the time, several Republicans joined Democrats in backing the summons.In a letter to Trump's AG Bondi, James Comer, the Republican chairman of the committee, said that they were examining the Justice Department's compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. He raised concerns about how material in the so-called Epstein Files had been reviewed and disclosed."As attorney general, you are directly responsible for overseeing the department's collection, review and determinations regarding the release of files pursuant to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and the committee therefore believes that you possess valuable insight into these efforts," Comer said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-hearing-turns-tense-as-pam-bondi-refuses-to-apologise-to-survivors-says-she-won-t-get-in-the-gutter-1770873842476">Epstein hearing turns tense as Pam Bondi refuses to apologise to survivors, says she won’t 'get in the gutter'. Watch!</a><h2>What is the Epstein Files Transparency Act?</h2>The Epstein Files Transparency Act is a federal law signed by US President Donald Trump on November 19, 2025. It mandates the public release of all DoJ records related to the investigation and prosecution of Epstein and his primary accomplice, socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.Lawmakers from both Republican and Democratic parties have condemned the department’s handling of the file release, saying that a significant share of the material is either still undisclosed or so heavily redacted that it is effectively inaccessible.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-files-debacle-doj-exposes-nude-victims-in-catastrophic-file-dump-but-remembers-to-redact-trump-s-face-1770021222053">Shocking Epstein Files debacle: DOJ exposes nude victims in catastrophic file dump, but remembers to redact Trump's face</a><h2>Did the DOJ Withhold Evidence of Epstein's 'Client List'?</h2>Based on assessments by Congress and multiple media outlets, the Justice Department has made public only about half of the six million pages it holds. The withheld documents, believed to number tens of thousands of documents, include those with explicit content or information that could reveal victims’ identities.Lauding the Bondi subpoena, Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, who introduced the motion, said, “Every victim deserves justice. Every crime deserves prosecution. But the reality is the rich and powerful rarely face consequences. This is exactly why the Epstein victims must be louder than ever.”“We will not let this go away. We will keep pushing and demanding answers until the truth can no longer be ignored,” she posted on social media.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🚨JUST IN🚨 The Oversight Committee has officially subpoenaed Attorney General Pam Bondi, after the committee passed our motion to subpoena her earlier this month. She will appear for a deposition on the Department of Justice&#39;s handling of the Epstein investigation and… <a href="https://t.co/3Y793j2Lpe">pic.twitter.com/3Y793j2Lpe</a>&mdash; Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepNancyMace/status/2034021701084733533?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 17, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Disclaimer: WION is only reporting the names that have been mentioned in the Epstein files and is not accusing anyone of any wrongdoing. Readers are advised to use their discretion on this article.

The House Oversight Committee formally subpoenaed AG Pam Bondi for an April 14 deposition. This comes as Republicans & Democrats accuse DOJ of withholding 3 million pages of Epstein files. Lauding the move, Rep. Nancy Mace warned: “No more dodging.” Why are Republicans turning on Bondi?

In a stunning "red-on-red" political escalation, the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday (Mar 17) formally subpoenaed Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify under oath about the Justice Department’s haphazard release of the notorious Jeffrey Epstein files. Led by a vocal faction of Republicans including Nancy Mace, the committee is demanding answers for what they describe as a "White House cover-up" involving missing video evidence and "haphazard" redactions that exposed victims while protecting powerful associates. As Republicans rejoice over the April 14 deposition date, Bondi, who in February taunted lawmakers over "pizzagate" and other conspiracy theories, now faces a bipartisan firing squad determined to unearth why 3 million pages of the sex trafficker's network remain buried. Also read | Pam Bondi subpoenaed: House oversight committee to force Trump's AG to testify on DOJ's alleged Epstein files 'cover-up' Why did Republicans Subpoena AG Pam Bondi Over Epstein Files? The House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed Pam Bondi, the Trump administration's top law enforcement official, to investigate what they describe as a possible mismanagement of the federal probe into paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. She will appear for a closed-door deposition on April 14. This follows a committee vote earlier this month to compel Bondi's testimony. At the time, several Republicans joined Democrats in backing the summons. In a letter to Trump's AG Bondi, James Comer, the Republican chairman of the committee, said that they were examining the Justice Department's compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. He raised concerns about how material in the so-called Epstein Files had been reviewed and disclosed. "As attorney general, you are directly responsible for overseeing the department's collection, review and determinations regarding the release of files pursuant to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and the committee therefore believes that you possess valuable insight into these efforts," Comer said. Also read | Epstein hearing turns tense as Pam Bondi refuses to apologise to survivors, says she won’t 'get in the gutter'. Watch! What is the Epstein Files Transparency Act? The Epstein Files Transparency Act is a federal law signed by US President Donald Trump on November 19, 2025. It mandates the public release of all DoJ records related to the investigation and prosecution of Epstein and his primary accomplice, socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. Lawmakers from both Republican and Democratic parties have condemned the department’s handling of the file release, saying that a significant share of the material is either still undisclosed or so heavily redacted that it is effectively inaccessible. Also read | Shocking Epstein Files debacle: DOJ exposes nude victims in catastrophic file dump, but remembers to redact Trump's face Did the DOJ Withhold Evidence of Epstein's 'Client List'? Based on assessments by Congress and multiple media outlets, the Justice Department has made public only about half of the six million pages it holds. The withheld documents, believed to number tens of thousands of documents, include those with explicit content or information that could reveal victims’ identities. Lauding the Bondi subpoena, Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, who introduced the motion, said, “Every victim deserves justice. Every crime deserves prosecution. But the reality is the rich and powerful rarely face consequences. This is exactly why the Epstein victims must be louder than ever.” “We will not let this go away. We will keep pushing and demanding answers until the truth can no longer be ignored,” she posted on social media.

The House Oversight Committee formally subpoenaed AG Pam Bondi for an April 14 deposition. This comes as Republicans &amp; Democrats accuse DOJ of withholding 3 million pages of Epstein files. Lauding the move, Rep. Nancy Mace warned: “No more dodging.” Why are Republicans turning on Bondi?

'Rich & powerful rarely face consequences': Why are Republicans rejoicing as House subpoenas Pam Bondi in Epstein files probe?

US Attorney General Pam Bondi is being compelled to testify in the ongoing US investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The House Oversight committee on Wednesday (Mar 4) voted 24-19 to approve a motion to subpoena US President Donald Trump's AG. Notably, the motion introduced by Republican representative Nancy Mace received the backing of five Republicans. The motion comes amid growing criticism across party lines over the Bondi-led Department of Justice's failures regarding the notorious Epstein Files. This, incidentally, includes the DoJ accidentally releasing the names and nudes of survivors, while identifying information of powerful figures like Trump was duly redacted.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-files-debacle-doj-exposes-nude-victims-in-catastrophic-file-dump-but-remembers-to-redact-trump-s-face-1770021222053">Shocking Epstein Files debacle: DOJ exposes nude victims in catastrophic file dump, but remembers to redact Trump's face</a><h2>Americans want answers</h2>Announcing the subpoena against Pam Bondi, Mace on X wrote, "The American people want answers on the Epstein files, and so do we".Meanwhile, Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat member of the House Committee, wrote in a post, "we can hold the Epstein class accountable if we are willing to cross the aisle and build a coalition of accountability".<h2>Bondi's controversial congressional testimony</h2>Previously, on February 11, Bondi refused to apologise to survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's nefarious underage sex racket, even after being pressed to do so at a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Bondi rebuffed Representative Pramilla Jayapal's request to turn around and address the victims of the convicted sex offender, and instead triggered a shouting match, accusing the Democrat lawmaker of "theatrics".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-hearing-turns-tense-as-pam-bondi-refuses-to-apologise-to-survivors-says-she-won-t-get-in-the-gutter-1770873842476">Epstein hearing turns tense as Pam Bondi refuses to apologise to survivors, says she won’t 'get in the gutter'. Watch!</a>At the hearing, Bondi also faced accusations of lying under oath to protect US President Donald Trump. &nbsp;The volatile congressional hearing also saw California Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu shame Bondi for failing to hold the paedophile's co-conspirators accountable. “Shame on you. If you had any decency, you would resign right after this hearing," he said.Lieu had questioned Bondi over Trump's tie to the deceased sex trafficker Epstein. He said that there was evidence that, like the disgraced British Royal Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Trump too attended parties with Epstein. "I want to know, were there any underage girls at that party or any party that Trump attended with Jeffrey Epstein?" he asked. However, Bondi was quick to dismiss his question as ridiculous and insisted it was merely an attempt to "deflect" from the great things Trump claims to have achieved. "There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime. Everyone knows this," a visibly exasperated Bondi said.&nbsp;

Why is the US Attorney General being forced to testify in the Epstein investigation? Lawmakers have voted to subpoena Pam Bondi as scrutiny grows over how the Jeffrey Epstein files were handled.

What triggered the move and what could Bondi be questioned about? Scroll down to read more.

US Attorney General Pam Bondi is being compelled to testify in the ongoing US investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The House Oversight committee on Wednesday (Mar 4) voted 24-19 to approve a motion to subpoena US President Donald Trump's AG. Notably, the motion introduced by Republican representative Nancy Mace received the backing of five Republicans. The motion comes amid growing criticism across party lines over the Bondi-led Department of Justice's failures regarding the notorious Epstein Files. This, incidentally, includes the DoJ accidentally releasing the names and nudes of survivors, while identifying information of powerful figures like Trump was duly redacted. Also read | Shocking Epstein Files debacle: DOJ exposes nude victims in catastrophic file dump, but remembers to redact Trump's face Americans want answers Announcing the subpoena against Pam Bondi, Mace on X wrote, "The American people want answers on the Epstein files, and so do we". Meanwhile, Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat member of the House Committee, wrote in a post, "we can hold the Epstein class accountable if we are willing to cross the aisle and build a coalition of accountability". Bondi's controversial congressional testimony Previously, on February 11, Bondi refused to apologise to survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's nefarious underage sex racket, even after being pressed to do so at a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Bondi rebuffed Representative Pramilla Jayapal's request to turn around and address the victims of the convicted sex offender, and instead triggered a shouting match, accusing the Democrat lawmaker of "theatrics". Also read | Epstein hearing turns tense as Pam Bondi refuses to apologise to survivors, says she won’t 'get in the gutter'. Watch! At the hearing, Bondi also faced accusations of lying under oath to protect US President Donald Trump. The volatile congressional hearing also saw California Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu shame Bondi for failing to hold the paedophile's co-conspirators accountable. “Shame on you. If you had any decency, you would resign right after this hearing," he said. Lieu had questioned Bondi over Trump's tie to the deceased sex trafficker Epstein. He said that there was evidence that, like the disgraced British Royal Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Trump too attended parties with Epstein. "I want to know, were there any underage girls at that party or any party that Trump attended with Jeffrey Epstein?" he asked. However, Bondi was quick to dismiss his question as ridiculous and insisted it was merely an attempt to "deflect" from the great things Trump claims to have achieved. "There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime. Everyone knows this," a visibly exasperated Bondi said.

Why is the US Attorney General being forced to testify in the Epstein investigation? Lawmakers have voted to subpoena Pam Bondi as scrutiny grows over how the Jeffrey Epstein files were handled.What triggered the move and what could Bondi be questioned about? Scroll down to read more.

Pam Bondi subpoenaed: House oversight committee forces Trump's AG to testify on DOJ's alleged Epstein files 'cover-up'

Jeffrey Epstein stashed computers and photographs in storage units scattered across the United States, according to reports. Financial records show the convicted sex offender rented at least six lock-ups over the years, paying monthly fees that continued until 2019, the year he died in custody. What are they hiding? Disturbing images of his young victims or incriminating blackmail material against powerful men? Here's what we know.<h2>At least six secret storage units still hide murky Epstein secrets</h2>According to documents reviewed by The Telegraph, Jeffrey Epstein's financial records, released as part of Department of Justice disclosures, show that the paedophile was renting at least six lock-ups when he died in 2019. Despite multiple mentions of the storage units, federal authorities never searched them, show search warrants examined by the newspaper.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-i-loved-the-torture-video-recipient-of-horrifying-epstein-email-finally-identified-doj-epstein-files-release-1770782784202">‘I loved the torture video’: Recipient of horrifying Epstein email FINALLY identified</a>If that is the case, the lockers could still contain material linked to Epstein and powerful figures in his orbit, including US President Donald Trump, disgraced UK royal Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (previously known as Prince Andrew) and Lord Mandelson. What, if anything, remains in those units is unknown.<figure class="image"><img src="https://assets.getkino.com/photos/EFTA00000471-0.png"><figcaption>Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures</figcaption></figure><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260224/image-1771896602035.png"><figcaption>Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures</figcaption></figure><h2>Epstein was tipped off about a raid on his Palm Beach residence?</h2>Emails and invoices indicate Epstein hired private detectives to remove computers from his Palm Beach home in the mid-2000s, around the time local police were preparing to execute a search warrant. In an August 2009 message, a private investigator told Epstein and his lawyers that computers and paperwork taken before a warrant had been secured were "locked in storage." The email also referred to copying, or "cloning," hard drives. It remains unclear what became of those copies.This tracks, former Palm Beach police chief Michael Reiter, after the search said the house appeared "cleaned up: before officers searched it in 2005. The newly unearthed correspondence suggests that it may not have been accidental.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explosive-epstein-files-accuse-trump-of-raping-13-year-old-murdering-a-new-born-white-house-says-this-about-allegations-1769823565436">Explosive Epstein files accuse Trump of raping 13-year-old, murdering a newborn; White House says THIS about allegations</a><h2>Payments that ran for years</h2>Credit card statements show regular payments to a Florida facility known as Uncle Bob’s beginning in 2003. Charges continued for years, with other storage units rented in Royal Palm Beach and Manhattan.<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260224/image-1771895649512.png"><figcaption>Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures</figcaption></figure><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260224/image-1771895893373.png"><figcaption>Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures</figcaption></figure>One New York unit, rented for roughly $500 a month, was reportedly opened on Epstein’s behalf by private investigators. In Florida, several of the lock-ups were located near his 14,000 square foot mansion on El Brillo Way, the property central to the sex trafficking investigation.Photographs believed to be from one unit show boxes, projectors, and what appears to be computer equipment stacked inside. The FBI declined to say whether any of the facilities were ever searched. Storage companies have also cited confidentiality rules.&nbsp;

Jeffrey Epstein stashed computers and photographs in storage units scattered across the United States, according to reports. Financial records show the convicted sex offender rented at least six lock-ups over the years, paying monthly fees that continued until 2019, the year he died in custody. What are they hiding? Disturbing images of his young victims or incriminating blackmail material against powerful men? Here's what we know. At least six secret storage units still hide murky Epstein secrets According to documents reviewed by The Telegraph, Jeffrey Epstein's financial records, released as part of Department of Justice disclosures, show that the paedophile was renting at least six lock-ups when he died in 2019. Despite multiple mentions of the storage units, federal authorities never searched them, show search warrants examined by the newspaper. Also read | ‘I loved the torture video’: Recipient of horrifying Epstein email FINALLY identified If that is the case, the lockers could still contain material linked to Epstein and powerful figures in his orbit, including US President Donald Trump, disgraced UK royal Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (previously known as Prince Andrew) and Lord Mandelson. What, if anything, remains in those units is unknown. Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures Epstein was tipped off about a raid on his Palm Beach residence? Emails and invoices indicate Epstein hired private detectives to remove computers from his Palm Beach home in the mid-2000s, around the time local police were preparing to execute a search warrant. In an August 2009 message, a private investigator told Epstein and his lawyers that computers and paperwork taken before a warrant had been secured were "locked in storage." The email also referred to copying, or "cloning," hard drives. It remains unclear what became of those copies. This tracks, former Palm Beach police chief Michael Reiter, after the search said the house appeared "cleaned up: before officers searched it in 2005. The newly unearthed correspondence suggests that it may not have been accidental. Also read | Explosive Epstein files accuse Trump of raping 13-year-old, murdering a newborn; White House says THIS about allegations Payments that ran for years Credit card statements show regular payments to a Florida facility known as Uncle Bob’s beginning in 2003. Charges continued for years, with other storage units rented in Royal Palm Beach and Manhattan. Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures Image credit: DoJ Jeffrey Epstein disclosures One New York unit, rented for roughly $500 a month, was reportedly opened on Epstein’s behalf by private investigators. In Florida, several of the lock-ups were located near his 14,000 square foot mansion on El Brillo Way, the property central to the sex trafficking investigation. Photographs believed to be from one unit show boxes, projectors, and what appears to be computer equipment stacked inside. The FBI declined to say whether any of the facilities were ever searched. Storage companies have also cited confidentiality rules.

Records show Jeffrey Epstein rented at least six storage units across Florida and New York until his 2019 death, but federal warrants suggest they were never searched. What's hidden in them? Unseen pics of young victims or blackmail material against powerful men. All you need to know.

REVEALED! At least 6 Epstein secret storage units missed by FBI. What are they hiding?

Questions are mounting in Washington after lawmakers accused the Trump administration of tracking their research into the Jeffrey Epstein files, raising concerns about whether the Justice Department is overstepping its authority and shielding sensitive information. The controversy erupted after photographs from the Wednesday (Feb 11) congressional hearing showed US Attorney General Pam Bondi holding a document labelled "Jayapal Pramila Search History," which appeared to list files accessed by Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal during her review of unredacted Epstein records provided to lawmakers.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-hearing-turns-tense-as-pam-bondi-refuses-to-apologise-to-survivors-says-she-won-t-get-in-the-gutter-1770873842476">Bondi equates apologising to Epstein survivors with 'getting in gutter'. Watch!</a><h2>Is the DoJ protecting someone?</h2>Access to the previously undisclosed Epstein materials was granted to members of Congress earlier this week under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. But several lawmakers now say the review process itself may have been designed to track their activity. Jayapal, whose review history Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi was seen with at the congressional hearing, slammed the DoJ, saying that the discovery confirmed her concerns. In a social media post, she wrote that Bondi appeared with a “burn book” containing a “printed search history of exactly what emails I searched”. Calling the practice inappropriate and a violation of the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch, she added, “That is outrageous, and I intend to pursue this and stop this spying on members.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">It is totally inappropriate and against the separations of powers for the DOJ to surveil us as we search the Epstein files. Bondi showed up today with a burn book that held a printed search history of exactly what emails I searched. That is outrageous and I intend to pursue this… <a href="https://t.co/nyZjmHoGUq">https://t.co/nyZjmHoGUq</a>&mdash; Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepJayapal/status/2021725059245609079?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 11, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pam-bondi-lied-under-oath-to-protect-potus-democrats-tell-ag-to-resign-amid-trump-epstein-links-watch-video-1770863293332">Pam Bondi accused of 'lying under oath': Is she trying to protect Trump? Video</a><h2>Justice Department defends logging practice</h2>Talking to The Guardian, the Justice Department acknowledged that it logs searches conducted by lawmakers reviewing the Epstein files. In a statement, a spokesperson said the tracking is intended to prevent the disclosure of victims’ identities and other sensitive information. "As part of that review, DoJ logs all searches made on its systems to protect against the release of victim information."Still, criticism has come from both sides of the political aisle. Republican Representative Nancy Mace described the monitoring as "creepy," while Democratic Representative Suhas Subramanyam said the confirmation explained earlier suspicions that lawmakers’ file access was being recorded.House Speaker Mike Johnson said such monitoring would be “inappropriate” if confirmed, though he initially said he had not reviewed the reports of the surveillance in detail.

Why was the US Attorney General Pam Bondi holding a document labelled with a lawmaker’s Epstein Files search history? Is the Justice Department tracking lawmakers?. Scroll down to read more.

Questions are mounting in Washington after lawmakers accused the Trump administration of tracking their research into the Jeffrey Epstein files, raising concerns about whether the Justice Department is overstepping its authority and shielding sensitive information. The controversy erupted after photographs from the Wednesday (Feb 11) congressional hearing showed US Attorney General Pam Bondi holding a document labelled "Jayapal Pramila Search History," which appeared to list files accessed by Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal during her review of unredacted Epstein records provided to lawmakers. Also read | Bondi equates apologising to Epstein survivors with 'getting in gutter'. Watch! Is the DoJ protecting someone? Access to the previously undisclosed Epstein materials was granted to members of Congress earlier this week under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. But several lawmakers now say the review process itself may have been designed to track their activity. Jayapal, whose review history Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi was seen with at the congressional hearing, slammed the DoJ, saying that the discovery confirmed her concerns. In a social media post, she wrote that Bondi appeared with a “burn book” containing a “printed search history of exactly what emails I searched”. Calling the practice inappropriate and a violation of the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch, she added, “That is outrageous, and I intend to pursue this and stop this spying on members.”

Why was the US Attorney General Pam Bondi holding a document labelled with a lawmaker’s Epstein Files search history? Is the Justice Department tracking lawmakers?. Scroll down to read more.

Trump admin tracking lawmakers’ Epstein files research, Bondi seen with 'Jayapal search history' document: Is the DoJ protecting someone?

The US attorney general Pam Bondi attacked and insulted Democrats during a House judiciary committee hearing on Wednesday as she defended the justice department’s handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.


‘You’re A Washed-Up Loser Lawyer’: Pam Bondi Taunts Democrats Over Epstein 

Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday (Feb 11) refused to apologise to survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's nefarious underage sex racket, even after being pressed to do so at a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Bondi rebuffed Representative Pramilla Jayapal's request to turn around and address the victims of the convicted sex offender, and instead triggered a shouting match, accusing the Democrat lawmaker of "theatrics".This comes days after the Bondi-led Department of Justice (DoJ) released a massive tranche of over 3 million documents from the Epstein files cache, most of which were riddled with redactions. Despite the heavily blacked-out sections, the file release, as per reports, contained nudes and identities of the victims, even as the identities of the offenders were redacted.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-files-debacle-doj-exposes-nude-victims-in-catastrophic-file-dump-but-remembers-to-redact-trump-s-face-1770021222053">Shocking Epstein Files debacle: DOJ exposes nude victims in catastrophic file dump, but remembers to redact Trump's face</a><h2>'Apologise' now</h2>At the heated congressional hearing, Jayapal directly addressed Epstein survivors who were present in the audience to stand up if they had not been able to meet with Donald Trump's justice department. 11 members of the audience stood up, to which the Democrat asked Bondi to "turn to them now and apologise for what your Department of Justice has put them through".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explosive-epstein-files-accuse-trump-of-raping-13-year-old-murdering-a-new-born-white-house-says-this-about-allegations-1769823565436">Explosive Epstein files accuse Trump of raping 13-year-old, murdering a newborn; White House says THIS about allegations</a>However, Trump's attorney general refused to apologise to the survivors and instead fired back, seeking to blame her predecessor, Merrick Garland. She claimed that in his four years as the AG, Garland was never asked about Epstein and also sought to drag former President Joe Biden through the mud. However, her exasperated rant was cut off by Jayapal, who said, "This is not about anybody that came before you."Watch the heated exchange here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">MUST WATCH: Pam Bondi has a public meltdown when Pramila Jayapal asked if she&#39;d apologize to Epstein survivors. Everyone needs to see this. <a href="https://t.co/IJaFKV3I5e">pic.twitter.com/IJaFKV3I5e</a>&mdash; First To Hear It (@firsttohearit) <a href="https://twitter.com/firsttohearit/status/2021613630488215935?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 11, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"It is about you taking responsibility for your Department of Justice and the harm that it has done to the survivors who are standing right behind you and are waiting for you to turn to them and apologise," said the Democrat. However, Bondi indignantly replied she wasn't going "to get in the gutter with these theatrics," before muttering "unprofessional".Also at the hearing, Bondi faced accusations of lying under oath to protect US President Donald Trump, who is known to have been friends with the convicted sex offender for years. Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pam-bondi-lied-under-oath-to-protect-potus-democrats-tell-ag-to-resign-amid-trump-epstein-links-watch-video-1770863293332">Pam Bondi accused of 'lying under oath': Is she trying to protect Trump? Video</a>

Pam Bondi refused to apologise to Epstein survivors during a tense House hearing, sparking a shouting match with Rep. Pramila Jayapal. She instead compared tendering an apology to “getting in the gutter” and “theatrics”. Scroll down to watch the full infuriating exchange.

Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday (Feb 11) refused to apologise to survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's nefarious underage sex racket, even after being pressed to do so at a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Bondi rebuffed Representative Pramilla Jayapal's request to turn around and address the victims of the convicted sex offender, and instead triggered a shouting match, accusing the Democrat lawmaker of "theatrics". This comes days after the Bondi-led Department of Justice (DoJ) released a massive tranche of over 3 million documents from the Epstein files cache, most of which were riddled with redactions. Despite the heavily blacked-out sections, the file release, as per reports, contained nudes and identities of the victims, even as the identities of the offenders were redacted. Also read | Shocking Epstein Files debacle: DOJ exposes nude victims in catastrophic file dump, but remembers to redact Trump's face 'Apologise' now At the heated congressional hearing, Jayapal directly addressed Epstein survivors who were present in the audience to stand up if they had not been able to meet with Donald Trump's justice department. 11 members of the audience stood up, to which the Democrat asked Bondi to "turn to them now and apologise for what your Department of Justice has put them through". Also read | Explosive Epstein files accuse Trump of raping 13-year-old, murdering a newborn; White House says THIS about allegations However, Trump's attorney general refused to apologise to the survivors and instead fired back, seeking to blame her predecessor, Merrick Garland. She claimed that in his four years as the AG, Garland was never asked about Epstein and also sought to drag former President Joe Biden through the mud. However, her exasperated rant was cut off by Jayapal, who said, "This is not about anybody that came before you." Watch the heated exchange here:

Pam Bondi refused to apologise to Epstein survivors during a tense House hearing, sparking a shouting match with Rep. Pramila Jayapal. She instead compared tendering an apology to “getting in the gutter” and “theatrics”. Scroll down to watch the full exchange.

Epstein hearing turns tense as Pam Bondi refuses to apologise to survivors, says she won’t 'get in the gutter'. Watch!

US Attorney General Pam Bondi defended the Justice Department’s handling of files involving the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein before a House of Representatives panel on Wednesday, saying the department painstakingly reviewed reams of documents on a compressed timeline. Bondi’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee came as lawmakers, including some Republicans, expressed frustration with the amount of Epstein material the department has redacted and withheld despite a federal law requiring the release of nearly all files.&nbsp;The Justice Department released what it called a final tranche of more than 3 million pages of documents, drawing renewed attention to wealthy and powerful individuals who maintained ties with Epstein even after his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor.“I have spent my entire career fighting for victims, and I will continue to do so,” Bondi said in her opening statement.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-us-used-pakistan-like-toilet-paper-says-defence-minister-khawaja-asif-1770808649575">‘US used Pakistan like toilet paper,’ says Defence Minister Khawaja Asif</a><h2>‘As attorney general, you’re siding with perpetrators and ignoring the victims’</h2>&nbsp;Lawmakers have complained that redactions in the files appear to go beyond the limited exemptions allowed for in a law Congress passed nearly unanimously in November. The department has also declined to publish a large volume of material, citing legal privileges.&nbsp;Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the committee, introduced several of Epstein’s victims who attended the hearing and accused Bondi of attempting to spare Epstein’s associates from “embarrassment and disgrace”.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-offer-bangladesh-defence-systems-to-counter-chinese-influence-ambassador-in-dhaka-1770804612423">‘US to offer Bangladesh defence systems to counter Chinese influence’: Washington's envoy in Dhaka</a>&nbsp;“As attorney general, you’re siding with the perpetrators and you’re ignoring the victims,” Raskin said.The Epstein files have dogged Bondi throughout her tenure as President Donald Trump’s attorney general.Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.&nbsp;<h2>‘Deeply sorry for what any Epstein victim has been through’</h2>&nbsp;&nbsp;The Justice Department has said it has been transparent in its review of documents, and redactions have been necessary to protect Epstein’s victims, though some victims’ names were made public as part of the release.&nbsp;Attorney General Pam Bondi addressed the Epstein files and defended the administration's handling of the case.She said that when people brought up names of survivors that were inadvertently released, they were then redacted.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bangladesh-general-election-2026-why-bangladesh-polls-matter-for-hindu-minority-s-safety-1770817177549">Bangladesh General Election 2026: Why Bangladesh polls matter for Hindu minority’s safety</a>&nbsp;“I am deeply sorry for what any victim, any victim, has been through, especially as a result of that monster,” she said.&nbsp;She said that the FBI is waiting to hear from people who have information about anyone who hurt them. She said any accusations of criminal wrongdoing would be investigated.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/day-before-bangladesh-polls-jamaat-leader-arrested-at-saidpur-airport-with-tk50-lakh-in-cash-1770813630948">Day before Bangladesh polls, Jamaat leader arrested at Saidpur Airport with Tk50 lakh in cash</a><h2>‘Crime is declining’: US Attorney General&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Bondi began her opening statement by touting a decrease in crime under her leadership at the DOJ.“After years of bloated bureaucracy and political weaponisation, Department of Justice’s core mission is to fight violent crime, protect the American people and defend the rule of law above all else. While our work is never done, we have made tremendous progress to make America safe again,” she said.&nbsp;Bondi said that 2025 had the lowest murder rate in 125 years. “That’s nothing short of historic,” she said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-no-state-neglected-in-budget-fm-nirmala-sitharaman-shreds-opposition-s-claims-1770824133461">‘No state neglected in Budget’: FM Nirmala Sitharaman shreds Opposition’s claims</a>&nbsp;“Crime is declining. President Trump has given us the resources, the support and the leadership to protect the American people. President Trump’s policies have saved lives. I cannot think of a policy outcome more important than protecting the lives of American citizens,” she said.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-files-dp-world-ceo-s-epstein-emails-spark-global-backlash-1770829575997/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-files-dp-world-ceo-s-epstein-emails-spark-global-backlash-1770829575997/embed</a>&nbsp;

Several lawmakers have complained that the redactions in the Epstein files appear to go beyond the limited exemptions allowed for in a law Congress passed in November. The department of justice has also declined to publish a large volume of material, citing legal privileges.

US Attorney General Pam Bondi defended the Justice Department’s handling of files involving the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein before a House of Representatives panel on Wednesday, saying the department painstakingly reviewed reams of documents on a compressed timeline. Bondi’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee came as lawmakers, including some Republicans, expressed frustration with the amount of Epstein material the department has redacted and withheld despite a federal law requiring the release of nearly all files. The Justice Department released what it called a final tranche of more than 3 million pages of documents, drawing renewed attention to wealthy and powerful individuals who maintained ties with Epstein even after his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. “I have spent my entire career fighting for victims, and I will continue to do so,” Bondi said in her opening statement. Also Read: ‘US used Pakistan like toilet paper,’ says Defence Minister Khawaja Asif ‘As attorney general, you’re siding with perpetrators and ignoring the victims’ Lawmakers have complained that redactions in the files appear to go beyond the limited exemptions allowed for in a law Congress passed nearly unanimously in November. The department has also declined to publish a large volume of material, citing legal privileges. Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the committee, introduced several of Epstein’s victims who attended the hearing and accused Bondi of attempting to spare Epstein’s associates from “embarrassment and disgrace”. Also Read: ‘US to offer Bangladesh defence systems to counter Chinese influence’: Washington's envoy in Dhaka “As attorney general, you’re siding with the perpetrators and you’re ignoring the victims,” Raskin said. The Epstein files have dogged Bondi throughout her tenure as President Donald Trump’s attorney general. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. ‘Deeply sorry for what any Epstein victim has been through’ The Justice Department has said it has been transparent in its review of documents, and redactions have been necessary to protect Epstein’s victims, though some victims’ names were made public as part of the release. Attorney General Pam Bondi addressed the Epstein files and defended the administration's handling of the case. She said that when people brought up names of survivors that were inadvertently released, they were then redacted. Also Read: Bangladesh General Election 2026: Why Bangladesh polls matter for Hindu minority’s safety “I am deeply sorry for what any victim, any victim, has been through, especially as a result of that monster,” she said. She said that the FBI is waiting to hear from people who have information about anyone who hurt them. She said any accusations of criminal wrongdoing would be investigated. Also Read: Day before Bangladesh polls, Jamaat leader arrested at Saidpur Airport with Tk50 lakh in cash ‘Crime is declining’: US Attorney General Bondi began her opening statement by touting a decrease in crime under her leadership at the DOJ. “After years of bloated bureaucracy and political weaponisation, Department of Justice’s core mission is to fight violent crime, protect the American people and defend the rule of law above all else. While our work is never done, we have made tremendous progress to make America safe again,” she said. Bondi said that 2025 had the lowest murder rate in 125 years. “That’s nothing short of historic,” she said. Also Read: ‘No state neglected in Budget’: FM Nirmala Sitharaman shreds Opposition’s claims “Crime is declining. President Trump has given us the resources, the support and the leadership to protect the American people. President Trump’s policies have saved lives. I cannot think of a policy outcome more important than protecting the lives of American citizens,” she said. https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-files-dp-world-ceo-s-epstein-emails-spark-global-backlash-1770829575997/embed

Several lawmakers have complained that the redactions in the Epstein files appear to go beyond the limited exemptions allowed for in a law Congress passed in November. The department of justice has also declined to publish a large volume of material, citing legal privileges.

US Attorney General Pam Bondi defends DOJ handling of Epstein files in House testimony

pam-bondi

Pam Bondi, News on Pam Bondi, stories on Pam Bondi, articles on Pam Bondi, Pam Bondi stories at Wion, Pam Bondi news, Pam Bondi latest news

pam bondi

Trump nominates his former lawyer Todd Blanche as US attorney general, Senate fight looms

Pam Bondi REVEALS who was really behind the botched Epstein files release

Epstein Files: Pam Bondi Defends Transparency, Declines Questions on Trump's Involvement

Epstein Files: Bondi Says Full Transparency Was Maintained During Files' Release

Pam Bondi defends Epstein files release but accepts redaction errors were made

House Oversight Committee questions Pam Bondi over Epstein document release

US Labour Secretary Resigns: Another Resignation After Kristi Noem And Pam Bondi

Epstein Files: Pam Bondi will not testify before House Oversight committee

Trump eyes wider Cabinet shake‑up as midterms loom and Iran war backlash deepens

FACT CHECK: Pam Bondi’s DOJ portrait ‘dumped in bin’?

Trump's Trust Deficit Leading to Power Shift Among Loyalists?

It’s not over for Pam Bondi? Fired AG still faces Epstein files grilling

'Kash Patel could be fired...': Ex-FBI agent's BIG claim after Pam Bondi ousted

Who is Todd Blanche? Interim DOJ head after Trump fires Pam Bondi amid Epstein files scrutiny

BREAKING: Deputy AG Todd Blanche To Take Over As Interim Attorney General

Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi after Epstein files release criticism

BREAKING: Trump Removes Pam Bondi As Attorney General

Why are Republicans rejoicing as Pam Bondi subpoena in Epstein files probe?

Pam Bondi subpoenaed, forced to testify on DOJ' alleged Epstein files 'cover-up'

DOJ files reveal 6 Epstein secret storage units FBI never raided. What's inside?

Trump tracking lawmakers’ Epstein files review: Is the DoJ protecting someone?

‘You’re A Washed-Up Loser Lawyer’: Pam Bondi Taunts Democrats Over Epstein

Bondi equates apologising to Epstein survivors with 'getting in gutter'. Watch!

US AG Pam Bondi defends DOJ handling of Epstein files in House testimony