SpaceX’s newly combined artificial intelligence unit, known as SpaceXAI, is witnessing a wave of employee exits following its recent merger with xAI. The company, linked to Elon Musk, has reportedly lost more than 50 researchers and engineers since February, according to reports.The development comes at a time when competition for AI talent is increasing across the industry, with several rival companies hiring from SpaceXAI.&nbsp;<h2>Senior engineers and researchers among those leaving</h2>Reports suggest that the exits include key figures working on coding, world models and voice technologies linked to Grok, the company’s AI system.Several employees have joined competitors, including Meta and Thinking Machines Lab, a firm founded by former OpenAI executive Mira Murati. At least 11 employees are said to have joined Meta, while seven have moved to Thinking Machines Lab.Earlier reports had also indicated that multiple employees, including two co-founders, left soon after the merger.<h2>Impact on core AI teams</h2>One of the main concerns is the shrinking size of SpaceXAI’s pre-training team. This team is responsible for building the initial stages of AI models, making it a critical part of the development process. The exit of team lead Juntang Zhuang and several other members has reduced the team to a small group, raising questions about the company’s ability to build new large-scale AI models.Experts note that pre-training is a foundational step in AI development, and any disruption at this stage can affect long-term progress.<h2>Reasons behind the departures</h2>Reports suggest that multiple factors may have contributed to the exits. Some employees have pointed to a demanding work culture, with tight deadlines and high expectations. Similar concerns have been raised by workers at other companies led by Musk, including Tesla. There are also indications that some employees chose to leave for financial reasons. SpaceX is known to offer share sale opportunities, allowing staff to monetise their equity. With expectations of a future public listing, some employees may have opted to exit after securing financial gains.<h2>Rising competition for AI talent</h2>The movement of employees highlights the increasing competition for skilled AI professionals. Companies such as Meta and newer AI startups are actively hiring engineers and researchers to strengthen their capabilities. This competition is shaping the industry, as firms try to attract talent with better working conditions, research opportunities and long-term incentives.<h2>What this means for SpaceXAI</h2>The recent exits raise questions about SpaceXAI’s future direction in artificial intelligence. While the merger was expected to strengthen its capabilities, the loss of key talent could affect its ability to compete with other AI companies. At the same time, the company has introduced new leadership and may look to rebuild its teams in the coming months.<h2>What happens next</h2>The situation at SpaceXAI reflects broader changes in the AI industry, where talent movement plays a key role in shaping innovation.As companies continue to invest in artificial intelligence, retaining skilled employees is becoming as important as developing new technology. The coming months will show whether SpaceXAI can stabilise its workforce and continue its AI development plans.&nbsp;

SpaceX’s newly combined artificial intelligence unit, known as SpaceXAI, is witnessing a wave of employee exits following its recent merger with xAI. The company, linked to Elon Musk, has reportedly lost more than 50 researchers and engineers since February, according to reports.

SpaceX’s newly combined artificial intelligence unit, known as SpaceXAI, is witnessing a wave of employee exits following its recent merger with xAI. The company, linked to Elon Musk, has reportedly lost more than 50 researchers and engineers since February, according to reports. The development comes at a time when competition for AI talent is increasing across the industry, with several rival companies hiring from SpaceXAI. Senior engineers and researchers among those leaving Reports suggest that the exits include key figures working on coding, world models and voice technologies linked to Grok, the company’s AI system. Several employees have joined competitors, including Meta and Thinking Machines Lab, a firm founded by former OpenAI executive Mira Murati. At least 11 employees are said to have joined Meta, while seven have moved to Thinking Machines Lab. Earlier reports had also indicated that multiple employees, including two co-founders, left soon after the merger. Impact on core AI teams One of the main concerns is the shrinking size of SpaceXAI’s pre-training team. This team is responsible for building the initial stages of AI models, making it a critical part of the development process. The exit of team lead Juntang Zhuang and several other members has reduced the team to a small group, raising questions about the company’s ability to build new large-scale AI models. Experts note that pre-training is a foundational step in AI development, and any disruption at this stage can affect long-term progress. Reasons behind the departures Reports suggest that multiple factors may have contributed to the exits. Some employees have pointed to a demanding work culture, with tight deadlines and high expectations. Similar concerns have been raised by workers at other companies led by Musk, including Tesla. There are also indications that some employees chose to leave for financial reasons. SpaceX is known to offer share sale opportunities, allowing staff to monetise their equity. With expectations of a future public listing, some employees may have opted to exit after securing financial gains. Rising competition for AI talent The movement of employees highlights the increasing competition for skilled AI professionals. Companies such as Meta and newer AI startups are actively hiring engineers and researchers to strengthen their capabilities. This competition is shaping the industry, as firms try to attract talent with better working conditions, research opportunities and long-term incentives. What this means for SpaceXAI The recent exits raise questions about SpaceXAI’s future direction in artificial intelligence. While the merger was expected to strengthen its capabilities, the loss of key talent could affect its ability to compete with other AI companies. At the same time, the company has introduced new leadership and may look to rebuild its teams in the coming months. What happens next The situation at SpaceXAI reflects broader changes in the AI industry, where talent movement plays a key role in shaping innovation. As companies continue to invest in artificial intelligence, retaining skilled employees is becoming as important as developing new technology. The coming months will show whether SpaceXAI can stabilise its workforce and continue its AI development plans.

SpaceX’s newly combined artificial intelligence unit, known as SpaceXAI, is witnessing a wave of employee exits following its recent merger with xAI. The company, linked to Elon Musk, has reportedly lost more than 50 researchers and engineers since February, according to reports.

Elon Musk’s SpaceXAI sees talent exits after merger: Why AI engineers are leaving SpaceXAI

The legal battle between Elon Musk and Sam Altman intensified in a U.S. courtroom as Musk’s lawyers accused OpenAI of abandoning its original mission of developing AI for humanity’s benefit. During the proceedings, Musk’s legal team questioned Altman’s credibility, while OpenAI strongly rejected the allegations. The high-profile case has become a major flashpoint in the global debate over artificial intelligence, corporate control, and the future direction of advanced AI systems.


Musk Vs OpenAI: Musk's Lawyer Calls Altman Untrustworthy In Court

Elon Musk shared a selfie moment with his electric car rival, Lei Jun, the CEO of Xiaomi, at the state banquet for US President Donald Trump hosted by China's President Xi Jinping. Xiaomi has become a leading name in the field of automobiles and is a major competitor to Tesla and Porsche in the Chinese market. Tesla also has a massive presence in China, and the country is one of the company's largest markets and primary manufacturing hubs. Musk shared a video of himself sitting at a table at the banquet as several people came up to him one after the other for a photo. Meanwhile, Marco Rubio and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang can be seen chatting with other leaders. After some time, Lei goes to Musk and takes a selfie, appearing to be a little charmed and happy to see the Tesla CEO. Meanwhile, Musk looks a little bored at the event, as pointed out by several users.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://t.co/QMgqquoGkS">pic.twitter.com/QMgqquoGkS</a>&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/2055155949242114463?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;<h2>Xiaomi and Tesla are rivals in China's car market</h2>The moment between Musk and Lei has become one of the highlights of the banquet since they are both rivals in China's car market. Tesla opened its first wholly overseas vehicle assembly plant in Shanghai in 2019, where it produces the Model 3 and Model Y. It also has showrooms and service centres across major cities in mainland China. Meanwhile, Xiaomi entered the automotive market with the launch of the Xiaomi SU7 (Speed Ultra), a high-performance electric sedan. The car is known for its sleek design and deep integration with Xiaomi’s existing tech ecosystem. It also has the "MX11" SUV in the pipeline, as industry leaks have confirmed that Xiaomi is currently testing its second vehicle. It is a battery-electric SUV, and its design is being compared to the Ferrari Purosangue.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-xi-meet-marred-by-day-of-altercations-us-media-and-chinese-security-officers-clash-at-temple-of-heaven-video-1778817000789">Trump-Xi meet marred by day of altercations: US media and Chinese security officers clash at Temple of Heaven - VIDEO</a><h2>Musk took his son X to China</h2>Apple CEO Tim Cook was also present at the banquet and was the next person to take a photo with Musk. The billionaire earlier went viral for acting like a tourist, shooting videos while other leaders in the delegation stood waiting for Trump and Xi. He also took his son X with him to China. Some netizens pointed out how Musk was posting from China even though the social media platform does not operate in the country. "My GOAT using VPN to access his app coz it's banned in China," a user wrote.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun took a photo with each other during the state banquet in Beijing after the latter approached him. They are both rivals in the country's market. Xiaomi's SU7 starts at $30,000, while the Tesla Model 3 starts at $37,000 and goes up to $55,000.

Elon Musk shared a selfie moment with his electric car rival, Lei Jun, the CEO of Xiaomi, at the state banquet for US President Donald Trump hosted by China's President Xi Jinping. Xiaomi has become a leading name in the field of automobiles and is a major competitor to Tesla and Porsche in the Chinese market. Tesla also has a massive presence in China, and the country is one of the company's largest markets and primary manufacturing hubs. Musk shared a video of himself sitting at a table at the banquet as several people came up to him one after the other for a photo. Meanwhile, Marco Rubio and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang can be seen chatting with other leaders. After some time, Lei goes to Musk and takes a selfie, appearing to be a little charmed and happy to see the Tesla CEO. Meanwhile, Musk looks a little bored at the event, as pointed out by several users.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun took a photo with each other during the state banquet in Beijing after the latter approached him. They are both rivals in the country's market. Xiaomi's SU7 starts at $30,000, while the Tesla Model 3 starts at $37,000 and goes up to $55,000.

Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun looks smitten as he takes a selfie with his rival Elon Musk - Watch

Elon Musk went viral after being spotted spinning around and filming like a tourist during a high-profile diplomatic state visit to Beijing, China. Both nations continue to engage in diplomatic posture, while the richest man on the planet, who is part of Trump's entourage, can be seen standing among officials and business leaders before Trump’s formal event with Xi Jinping begins. Musk held up his phone and slowly spun in circles to record the 360-degree video of the venue.&nbsp;The moment quickly went viral on social media because of how relaxed he looked in a high-stakes diplomatic event. Many compared him to a child excitedly recording everything around him. One user commented, “I imagine the intelligence services of both sides hacking each other’s communications," a user wrote. Another joked, “he is scanning the Chinese… what a legend!" “Hahahahaha, it’s a little kid with a phone filming everything," wrote another.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-trump-brought-top-us-ceos-to-beijing-china-visit-1778744738917">From NVIDIA to Goldman Sachs: Why America’s top CEOs are with Trump in China</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Uno que esta disfrutando el viaje a china es el elon musk (Míralo al pibe bessnet ahi al lado) <a href="https://t.co/34l1El9qdx">pic.twitter.com/34l1El9qdx</a>&mdash; ElBuni (@therealbuni) <a href="https://twitter.com/therealbuni/status/2054753252126720051?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 14, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">JUST IN: Elon Musk &amp; Apple <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24AAPL&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">$AAPL</a> CEO Tim Cook at China&#39;s state dinner. <a href="https://t.co/GI8T0bVaMy">pic.twitter.com/GI8T0bVaMy</a>&mdash; Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) <a href="https://twitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/2054892303030821231?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 14, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Another moment of unfiltered Musk</h2>Musk once again went viral but for a completely unrelated reason. Images of Musk and Apple CEO Tim Cook smiling and reacting mid-photo together quickly trended across social media platforms. On one side was Tim Cook, and on the other side was a hostess who was serving him. Musk could be seen making eye gestures and animated facial expressions next to a Chinese hostess, which appeared as if he was leering. Some loved his gestures and expressions, while others commented that it was amusing to know that the richest man in the world could also be so non-serious.

Elon Musk went viral after filming a 360-degree video and making animated expressions during a high-profile diplomatic event in Beijing attended by Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and top business leaders.

Elon Musk went viral after being spotted spinning around and filming like a tourist during a high-profile diplomatic state visit to Beijing, China. Both nations continue to engage in diplomatic posture, while the richest man on the planet, who is part of Trump's entourage, can be seen standing among officials and business leaders before Trump’s formal event with Xi Jinping begins. Musk held up his phone and slowly spun in circles to record the 360-degree video of the venue. The moment quickly went viral on social media because of how relaxed he looked in a high-stakes diplomatic event. Many compared him to a child excitedly recording everything around him. One user commented, “I imagine the intelligence services of both sides hacking each other’s communications," a user wrote. Another joked, “he is scanning the Chinese… what a legend!" “Hahahahaha, it’s a little kid with a phone filming everything," wrote another. Also Read: From NVIDIA to Goldman Sachs: Why America’s top CEOs are with Trump in China

Elon Musk went viral after filming a 360-degree video and making animated expressions during a high-profile diplomatic event in Beijing attended by Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and top business leaders.

Elon Musk goes viral for spinning and filming like a tourist during Trump’s China visit

The long-running feud between Elon Musk and Sam Altman has intensified inside the courtroom, with Altman rejecting Musk’s accusations that OpenAI abandoned its original nonprofit mission. Altman reportedly argued that Musk had earlier sought greater control over the company during its formative years. The legal battle is now shining a spotlight on the future of AI development, corporate power and the growing rivalry between two of tech’s most influential figures.


Musk vs OpenAI: Altman Fires Back At Musk In OpenAI Trial Over Control And Mission Claims

Streaming platform Netflix is facing a privacy lawsuit in Texas over allegations linked to user tracking and surveillance practices.
The lawsuit claims the company engaged in invasive data collection methods that may have violated consumer privacy protections.


Netflix Faces Texas Privacy Lawsuit Over Alleged Spying Claims

French authorities have launched a major investigation into Elon Musk and the social media platform X over concerns linked to AI-generated content. The probe reportedly focuses on child abuse imagery, deepfakes, misinformation, and the spread of harmful digital material. The move highlights growing global pressure on tech platforms to control AI-generated content as governments tighten regulations around online safety and disinformation.


France Expands Probe Into Elon Musk's X Over AI Content 

Elon Musk's SpaceX has announced that it has signed a deal with Anthropic to facilitate access to XAI's massive hardware to increase the computing capability for its Claude AI models. The announcement was made when Anthropic held a developer day in San Francisco, where it unveiled its new feature “dreaming”, which is meant to help AI systems work between sessions, spot patterns, update files that store user preferences and other context.&nbsp;<h2>What is the deal?</h2>As part of the deal, Anthropic gains exclusive access to the full capacity of the Colossus 1 supercomputer in Memphis, Tennessee. It is home to more than 220,000 Nvidia processors and will give the Claude chatbot maker 300 megawatts of new capacity within a month. The Colossus edge is currently the largest supercomputer in the world and will help Anthropic run Claude at a higher "compute density" than they could on standard cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud. It also “expressed interest” in working with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of compute capacity in space.Anthorpic will essentially pay $3–$4 bn annually. At the same time, this puts XAI at par with other computing giants like Google, Microsoft or AWS, and having a revenue stream from its computing service, it makes XAI more valuable to Wall Street investors. Musk further gets “the kill switch” as a political and ethical leverage over one of its biggest competitors, which can monitor, gatekeep, the operational scale, load, and efficiency of an AI giant.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-strait-of-hormuz-authority-transit-rules-us-tensions-1778224318936">Iran creates new Persian Gulf Strait Authority to formalise control of Hormuz</a><h2>Why is this a frenemy deal?</h2>Musk has always criticised Anthropic; he said that it was “doomed to become the opposite of its name,” which would be misanthropic. He called the company “hypocritical”, and now, to some extent proving his point. In February 2026, Musk said that Anthropic “hates Western Civilisation”. But on Wednesday, he shifted his rhetoric; he said that he was “impressed” after meeting the team.&nbsp;In a social media post, Musk wrote, “Everyone I met was highly competent and cared a great deal about doing the right thing. No one set off my evil detector." He added, “So long as they engage in critical self-examination, Claude will probably be good.”The two AI model positioned themself as polar opposite to each other. Anthropic's Claude AI thumps its chest over Constitutional AI (a written "bill of rights" for the AI), which Musk dismissed as “enforced diversity”. The Anthropic has hypocritically put itself into the same orbit as Elon Musk’s "anti-woke" and "maximalist" philosophy for xAI. Anthropic claims that it's just renting the engine while hands steering the wheel remain with itself. Whereas Musk have appointed himself as the arbitrator and reserves the right to reclaim the compute if the AI engages in actions he deems “harmful to humanity.” While analysts suggest both of them are in bed together and continue their performative rivalry and consolidate power by controlling the air that AI models need to breathe.

After years of attacking Anthropic, Elon Musk’s xAI has signed a massive compute deal to power Claude AI using the Colossus supercomputer, reshaping the AI power struggle.

Elon Musk's SpaceX has announced that it has signed a deal with Anthropic to facilitate access to XAI's massive hardware to increase the computing capability for its Claude AI models. The announcement was made when Anthropic held a developer day in San Francisco, where it unveiled its new feature “dreaming”, which is meant to help AI systems work between sessions, spot patterns, update files that store user preferences and other context. What is the deal? As part of the deal, Anthropic gains exclusive access to the full capacity of the Colossus 1 supercomputer in Memphis, Tennessee. It is home to more than 220,000 Nvidia processors and will give the Claude chatbot maker 300 megawatts of new capacity within a month. The Colossus edge is currently the largest supercomputer in the world and will help Anthropic run Claude at a higher "compute density" than they could on standard cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud. It also “expressed interest” in working with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of compute capacity in space. Anthorpic will essentially pay $3–$4 bn annually. At the same time, this puts XAI at par with other computing giants like Google, Microsoft or AWS, and having a revenue stream from its computing service, it makes XAI more valuable to Wall Street investors. Musk further gets “the kill switch” as a political and ethical leverage over one of its biggest competitors, which can monitor, gatekeep, the operational scale, load, and efficiency of an AI giant. Also Read: Iran creates new Persian Gulf Strait Authority to formalise control of Hormuz Why is this a frenemy deal? Musk has always criticised Anthropic; he said that it was “doomed to become the opposite of its name,” which would be misanthropic. He called the company “hypocritical”, and now, to some extent proving his point. In February 2026, Musk said that Anthropic “hates Western Civilisation”. But on Wednesday, he shifted his rhetoric; he said that he was “impressed” after meeting the team. In a social media post, Musk wrote, “Everyone I met was highly competent and cared a great deal about doing the right thing. No one set off my evil detector." He added, “So long as they engage in critical self-examination, Claude will probably be good.” The two AI model positioned themself as polar opposite to each other. Anthropic's Claude AI thumps its chest over Constitutional AI (a written "bill of rights" for the AI), which Musk dismissed as “enforced diversity”. The Anthropic has hypocritically put itself into the same orbit as Elon Musk’s "anti-woke" and "maximalist" philosophy for xAI. Anthropic claims that it's just renting the engine while hands steering the wheel remain with itself. Whereas Musk have appointed himself as the arbitrator and reserves the right to reclaim the compute if the AI engages in actions he deems “harmful to humanity.” While analysts suggest both of them are in bed together and continue their performative rivalry and consolidate power by controlling the air that AI models need to breathe.

After years of attacking Anthropic, Elon Musk’s xAI has signed a massive compute deal to power Claude AI using the Colossus supercomputer, reshaping the AI power struggle.

‘No one triggered my evil detector’: Musk’s xAI strikes shocking deal with rival Anthropic

Elon Musk has settled a long-running disclosure dispute with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over his Twitter stake. The deal includes a $1.5 million fine paid through a trust, without any admission of wrongdoing. The settlement brings closure to questions around delayed share disclosures, ending a closely watched legal battle tied to one of the world’s most high-profile tech acquisitions.

Elon Musk Settles SEC Disclosure Case Over Twitter Stake, Agrees To $1.5M Fine 

A high-stakes legal battle is unfolding around OpenAI after failed settlement talks ahead of trial. Greg Brockman has revealed a reported $30 billion stake linked to the company and ties to Sam Altman, raising questions about governance. Elon Musk has alleged potential conflicts of interest, intensifying scrutiny. The case could reshape OpenAI’s structure, leadership, and future direction.


OpenAI Power Struggle: $30 Billion Stake Row Deepens as Musk Questions Independence

Elon Musk has taken the stand in a closely watched California courtroom battle involving OpenAI, the company he once helped establish. The high-stakes case centres on OpenAI’s structure, direction and long-term mission, with Musk arguing that the organisation has moved away from its original vision. The trial is being seen as a defining moment for the artificial intelligence industry, with experts saying the outcome could influence how powerful AI companies are governed in the future.


OpenAI Trial: Courtroom Exchange Raises Strategic Risks For Musk Team 

Elon Musk has another reason to land humans on Mars - his own pay package. According to a Reuters report, the SpaceX Board members have approved a compensation plan that would only kick in if the company successfully achieves its aims linked to the Red Planet. SpaceX recently filed a confidential registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which states that Musk will get $200 million in super-voting restricted shares if the company hits two goals: a market value of $7.5 trillion and a colony of at least 1 million people on Mars. Besides the interplanetary goal, the statement also states that Musk would get additional incentives of $60.4 million in restricted shares if SpaceX is able to operate space-based data centres with at least 100 terawatts of processing power. However, Musk has admitted that colonising Mars will take at least 20 more years. He recently also pushed back on the timeline and even added Moon as the midpoint. So the Board has now attached his appraisal with his achievements in clear terms. Basically, no Mars, no perks.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/hidden-cosmic-route-could-speed-up-mars-travel-a-study-suggests-asteroid-data-may-slash-journey-time-to-153-days-1777448499484">A secret space shortcut to Mars? New study suggests asteroid data could cut travel time to just 153 days</a><h2>Musk and his plan to colonise Mars tied to his pay package</h2>Musk has pushed his plan of sending people to Mars and setting up a human colony for several years now. He has said many times that humanity needs to find a new home and that Mars is the answer. He plans to send one million people to Mars by 2050. The SpaceX CEO put his staff to work, who are reportedly spending hours every day on the interplanetary plan. The company developed Starship to achieve this dream, which has been tested several times and is still undergoing improvements. He never emphasised the role of the Moon in the mission, saying that Starship can directly take humans to Mars. However, earlier this year, Musk said that SpaceX has shifted focus towards building "a self-growing city on the Moon." He argued that this can be done in the next 10 years, while a Mars landing will take at least 20 years.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/mind-blown-see-47-million-galaxies-in-the-largest-3d-map-of-the-universe-each-dot-in-this-photo-is-a-galaxy-1776433522489">MIND BLOWN! See 47 million galaxies in the largest 3D map of the universe. Each dot in this photo is a galaxy</a>&nbsp;The compensation plan for Musk is likely an attempt to keep him committed to SpaceX’s long-term vision. Although the valuation targets lack a strict timeline, Musk would receive zero shares if the company fails to meet the outlined goals. His current worth is an estimated $773.9 billion, according to Forbes. This would multiply manifold if he can not only save humanity but also colonise Mars.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Elon Musk has a new reason to push forward with his plans to send humans to Mars. The SpaceX board has tied his compensation to his success in colonising Mars and sending at least 1 million people to the Red Planet. However, Musk's own timeline for this is 20 years.

Elon Musk has another reason to land humans on Mars - his own pay package. According to a Reuters report, the SpaceX Board members have approved a compensation plan that would only kick in if the company successfully achieves its aims linked to the Red Planet. SpaceX recently filed a confidential registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which states that Musk will get $200 million in super-voting restricted shares if the company hits two goals: a market value of $7.5 trillion and a colony of at least 1 million people on Mars. Besides the interplanetary goal, the statement also states that Musk would get additional incentives of $60.4 million in restricted shares if SpaceX is able to operate space-based data centres with at least 100 terawatts of processing power. However, Musk has admitted that colonising Mars will take at least 20 more years. He recently also pushed back on the timeline and even added Moon as the midpoint. So the Board has now attached his appraisal with his achievements in clear terms. Basically, no Mars, no perks. Also Read: A secret space shortcut to Mars? New study suggests asteroid data could cut travel time to just 153 days Musk and his plan to colonise Mars tied to his pay package Musk has pushed his plan of sending people to Mars and setting up a human colony for several years now. He has said many times that humanity needs to find a new home and that Mars is the answer. He plans to send one million people to Mars by 2050. The SpaceX CEO put his staff to work, who are reportedly spending hours every day on the interplanetary plan. The company developed Starship to achieve this dream, which has been tested several times and is still undergoing improvements. He never emphasised the role of the Moon in the mission, saying that Starship can directly take humans to Mars. However, earlier this year, Musk said that SpaceX has shifted focus towards building "a self-growing city on the Moon." He argued that this can be done in the next 10 years, while a Mars landing will take at least 20 years. Also Read: MIND BLOWN! See 47 million galaxies in the largest 3D map of the universe. Each dot in this photo is a galaxy The compensation plan for Musk is likely an attempt to keep him committed to SpaceX’s long-term vision. Although the valuation targets lack a strict timeline, Musk would receive zero shares if the company fails to meet the outlined goals. His current worth is an estimated $773.9 billion, according to Forbes. This would multiply manifold if he can not only save humanity but also colonise Mars.

You think your work goals are too audacious? They are nothing compared to what Elon Musk has to achieve. The SpaceX board has tied his compensation to colonising Mars and sending at least 1 million people to the Red Planet. However, Musk's own timeline for this is 20 years.

No Mars, no moolah: Musk's appraisal directly tied to settling 1 million people on Red Planet

Musk vs OpenAI: Musk Alleges OpenAI Abandoned Public-Interest Mission

A tense moment unfolded in a California federal court as Elon Musk accused a lawyer representing Sam Altman of trying to mislead him during cross-examination.The exchange took place during an ongoing trial involving OpenAI, where Musk has filed a lawsuit over the company’s shift from a non-profit mission to a for-profit structure.&nbsp;<h2>What happened in the courtroom</h2>During questioning, lawyer William Savitt asked Musk about the tax benefits linked to his $38 million donation to OpenAI. Savitt described his questions as simple, but Musk disagreed.“Your questions are not simple. They are designed to trick me,” Musk told the court, speaking before a nine-member jury.The exchange became increasingly tense, with both sides interrupting each other as they tried to present their arguments.&nbsp;<h2>What is the dispute about?</h2>Musk’s lawsuit focuses on OpenAI’s original mission.He claims that:OpenAI was meant to operate as a non-profit organisationThe company later shifted towards a for-profit model in 2019This change, according to him, benefited its leadershipMusk has also accused the company of breach of trust and unjust enrichment.He is seeking $150 billion in damages, with any compensation intended for OpenAI’s charitable arm.&nbsp;OpenAI’s response to Musk’s claimsOpenAI has rejected Musk’s allegations.The company argues that:Musk supported the idea of a for-profit structure in earlier discussionsHe wanted a larger role in leading the companyHis current actions may be linked to competition with his AI venture, xAIOpenAI has said the shift to a for-profit model was necessary to:Attract investmentBuild computing infrastructureHire skilled researchers<h2>Key evidence presented in court</h2>During the trial, several emails and messages were shown to the jury.These included:A 2015 email where Musk discussed a possible for-profit structureA 2017 email where Musk called himself a “fool” for funding what he believed was a non-profit. Messages exchanged after Microsoft’s investment in OpenAIMusk described the investment move as a “bait and switch” and said an offer to let him invest felt like a “bribe”.&nbsp;From partnership to legal battleMusk, Altman and Greg Brockman were part of the founding team of OpenAI in 2015.Musk later left the company in 2018. Since then, the relationship between the founders has changed significantly.Today, the case reflects a wider disagreement over:&nbsp;The direction of AI developmentThe role of private investmentControl over advanced technologies<h2>Why this case matters</h2>The trial is not just about a dispute between individuals. It raises broader questions about how AI companies should operate.At the centre is a key issue:Should advanced AI be developed as a public good?Or should companies adopt commercial models to scale faster?The outcome of the case could influence how AI organisations are structured in the future.<h2>What happens next?</h2>The trial is ongoing, with more witnesses and arguments expected in the coming days.The court will examine:OpenAI’s structure and funding modelInternal communications between foundersWhether the company followed its original mission For now, Musk’s testimony and the courtroom exchanges highlight how complex and high-stakes the debate around AI governance has become&nbsp;

A tense exchange unfolded in a California federal court as Elon Musk accused a lawyer representing Sam Altman of trying to mislead him during cross-examination. The clash is part of Musk’s high-stakes lawsuit against OpenAI over its shift from a non-profit mission to a for-profit structure.

A tense moment unfolded in a California federal court as Elon Musk accused a lawyer representing Sam Altman of trying to mislead him during cross-examination. The exchange took place during an ongoing trial involving OpenAI, where Musk has filed a lawsuit over the company’s shift from a non-profit mission to a for-profit structure. What happened in the courtroom During questioning, lawyer William Savitt asked Musk about the tax benefits linked to his $38 million donation to OpenAI. Savitt described his questions as simple, but Musk disagreed. “Your questions are not simple. They are designed to trick me,” Musk told the court, speaking before a nine-member jury. The exchange became increasingly tense, with both sides interrupting each other as they tried to present their arguments. What is the dispute about? Musk’s lawsuit focuses on OpenAI’s original mission. He claims that: OpenAI was meant to operate as a non-profit organisation The company later shifted towards a for-profit model in 2019 This change, according to him, benefited its leadership Musk has also accused the company of breach of trust and unjust enrichment. He is seeking $150 billion in damages, with any compensation intended for OpenAI’s charitable arm. OpenAI’s response to Musk’s claims OpenAI has rejected Musk’s allegations. The company argues that: Musk supported the idea of a for-profit structure in earlier discussions He wanted a larger role in leading the company His current actions may be linked to competition with his AI venture, xAI OpenAI has said the shift to a for-profit model was necessary to: Attract investment Build computing infrastructure Hire skilled researchers Key evidence presented in court During the trial, several emails and messages were shown to the jury. These included: A 2015 email where Musk discussed a possible for-profit structure A 2017 email where Musk called himself a “fool” for funding what he believed was a non-profit. Messages exchanged after Microsoft’s investment in OpenAI Musk described the investment move as a “bait and switch” and said an offer to let him invest felt like a “bribe”. From partnership to legal battle Musk, Altman and Greg Brockman were part of the founding team of OpenAI in 2015. Musk later left the company in 2018. Since then, the relationship between the founders has changed significantly. Today, the case reflects a wider disagreement over: The direction of AI development The role of private investment Control over advanced technologies Why this case matters The trial is not just about a dispute between individuals. It raises broader questions about how AI companies should operate. At the centre is a key issue: Should advanced AI be developed as a public good? Or should companies adopt commercial models to scale faster? The outcome of the case could influence how AI organisations are structured in the future. What happens next? The trial is ongoing, with more witnesses and arguments expected in the coming days. The court will examine: OpenAI’s structure and funding model Internal communications between founders Whether the company followed its original mission For now, Musk’s testimony and the courtroom exchanges highlight how complex and high-stakes the debate around AI governance has become

A tense exchange unfolded in a California federal court as Elon Musk accused a lawyer representing Sam Altman of trying to mislead him during cross-examination. The clash is part of Musk’s high-stakes lawsuit against OpenAI over its shift from a non-profit mission to a for-profit structure.

Elon Musk accuses OpenAI lawyer of ‘trying to trick me’ in court

Elon Musk Testifies In Explosive OpenAI Trial That Could Reshape AI Industry

Elon Musk has begun testifying in a major legal case against OpenAI and its leadership, including CEO Sam Altman and president Greg Brockman. The trial, taking place in a California federal court, is one of the most closely watched disputes in the artificial intelligence industry.<h2>What is the case about?</h2>The case centres on claims made by Musk that OpenAI has moved away from its original mission. OpenAI was founded with the aim of building artificial general intelligence (AGI) that benefits humanity. Musk, who was part of the founding team and invested about $38 million, argues that the company has shifted towards a profit-driven model.According to the lawsuit, Musk has raised concerns including:Alleged breach of OpenAI’s founding principlesClaims of unjust enrichmentConcerns over the company’s restructuring into a for-profit modelMusk has asked the court to remove Altman and Brockman from leadership roles and review OpenAI’s current structure.<h2>From partnership to rivalry</h2>Musk, Altman and Brockman were once part of the same founding group at OpenAI. However, differences soon emerged over the company’s direction, including discussions around whether OpenAI should be integrated with Tesla, which Musk leads. Musk later stepped away from OpenAI and went on to launch his own AI company, xAI, positioning it as a competitor in the same space.<h2>Who else could testify?</h2>The trial is expected to feature testimony from several major figures in the tech industry.These may include:Satya Nadella Kevin Scott Mira MuratiMicrosoft is also named in the case due to its partnership and investment in OpenAI.<h2>Why this case matters</h2>This trial goes beyond a personal dispute. It raises wider questions about how AI companies operate. At the centre of the debate is whether organisations developing advanced AI should:Remain focused on public benefitOr adopt commercial models to scale fasterThe outcome of the case could influence how future AI companies are structured and regulated.<h2>What happens next?</h2>The trial is expected to continue with more testimonies and legal arguments in the coming weeks.As both sides present their case, the court will examine:OpenAI’s organisational changes Financial structure Whether its actions align with its original missionFor now, Musk’s testimony marks a key moment in a case that could shape the future direction of the AI industry.

Elon Musk has begun testifying in a major US court case against OpenAI and its leadership. The trial, taking place in a California federal court, focuses on claims that OpenAI has shifted away from its original mission of building AI for public benefit and moved toward a profit-driven model.


Elon Musk has begun testifying in a major legal case against OpenAI and its leadership, including CEO Sam Altman and president Greg Brockman. The trial, taking place in a California federal court, is one of the most closely watched disputes in the artificial intelligence industry. What is the case about? The case centres on claims made by Musk that OpenAI has moved away from its original mission. OpenAI was founded with the aim of building artificial general intelligence (AGI) that benefits humanity. Musk, who was part of the founding team and invested about $38 million, argues that the company has shifted towards a profit-driven model. According to the lawsuit, Musk has raised concerns including: Alleged breach of OpenAI’s founding principles Claims of unjust enrichment Concerns over the company’s restructuring into a for-profit model Musk has asked the court to remove Altman and Brockman from leadership roles and review OpenAI’s current structure. From partnership to rivalry Musk, Altman and Brockman were once part of the same founding group at OpenAI. However, differences soon emerged over the company’s direction, including discussions around whether OpenAI should be integrated with Tesla, which Musk leads. Musk later stepped away from OpenAI and went on to launch his own AI company, xAI, positioning it as a competitor in the same space. Who else could testify? The trial is expected to feature testimony from several major figures in the tech industry. These may include: Satya Nadella Kevin Scott Mira Murati Microsoft is also named in the case due to its partnership and investment in OpenAI. Why this case matters This trial goes beyond a personal dispute. It raises wider questions about how AI companies operate. At the centre of the debate is whether organisations developing advanced AI should: Remain focused on public benefit Or adopt commercial models to scale faster The outcome of the case could influence how future AI companies are structured and regulated. What happens next? The trial is expected to continue with more testimonies and legal arguments in the coming weeks. As both sides present their case, the court will examine: OpenAI’s organisational changes Financial structure Whether its actions align with its original mission For now, Musk’s testimony marks a key moment in a case that could shape the future direction of the AI industry.

Elon Musk has begun testifying in a major US court case against OpenAI and its leadership. The trial, taking place in a California federal court, focuses on claims that OpenAI has shifted away from its original mission of building AI for public benefit and moved toward a profit-driven model.

Elon Musk challenges OpenAI’s shift to a profit model in court: What the case is about

Elon Musk’s legal fight against OpenAI has entered a major new phase after a jury was selected in California. Musk alleges the company abandoned its original mission and shifted away from the principles it was founded on. The closely watched case could have major implications for the future of artificial intelligence, corporate governance, and the battle over control of advanced AI systems.


Musk vs OpenAI: Elon Musk Claims OpenAI Betrayed Founding Mission

Elon Musk’s Legal Battle With OpenAI Intensifies As Jury Selected In California

The legal battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI is set to go to trial in the United States, marking a major moment in the ongoing dispute over the company’s direction and governance. Musk is reportedly seeking billions in financial disgorgement, while the case could also impact OpenAI’s structure and future IPO plans. The outcome may have wide-reaching consequences for the global artificial intelligence industry.


Musk vs OpenAI: Musk Claims He Was Misled Over OpenAI's Original Mission 

Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of Tesla and X, is set to go to trial against Sam Altman and OpenAI in a case that could define the future direction of artificial intelligence development. The lawsuit centres on what Musk calls a “broken promise” by the company he co-founded in 2015.&nbsp;Musk argues that OpenAI has moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. He claims that under Altman’s leadership, the organisation has shifted from a non-profit model to a closed-source, profit-driven structure closely linked to Microsoft.&nbsp;&nbsp;Musk says he invested about 100 million dollars in the early years to ensure that AI would not be controlled by a few large corporations.&nbsp;OpenAI and Altman have rejected the claims, calling the lawsuit a distraction driven by competition. They point out that Musk is now building his own AI venture, xAI, which directly competes with OpenAI. According to them, the legal challenge is an attempt to slow down the growth of tools like ChatGPT.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-weighing-proposal-aimed-at-satisfying-us-demands-trump-claims-ahead-of-second-round-of-talks-in-pakistan-1777059310739">Iran weighing proposal aimed at satisfying US demands, Trump claims ahead of second round of talks in Pakistan</a>&nbsp;The dispute has its roots in OpenAI’s early years, when Musk, Altman and researchers, including Ilya Sutskever, launched the organisation to counter the growing influence of Google in AI. Rising computing costs later put pressure on the model, and in 2019, Musk left the board after disagreements over control. Soon after, OpenAI created a capped profit structure to attract investment.&nbsp;The launch of ChatGPT in 2022 brought global attention and rapid growth, backed by a reported $13 billion investment from Microsoft. The company also saw internal turmoil in 2023 when Altman was briefly removed and then reinstated after employee backlash.&nbsp;The case, expected to be closely watched when it proceeds on April 27, will test Musk’s claim that he was misled into supporting a project that has now shifted towards profit. OpenAI maintains that the case lacks legal merit and reflects Musk’s own business interests as competition in the AI sector intensifies.

Musk argues that OpenAI has moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.

Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of Tesla and X, is set to go to trial against Sam Altman and OpenAI in a case that could define the future direction of artificial intelligence development. The lawsuit centres on what Musk calls a “broken promise” by the company he co-founded in 2015. Musk argues that OpenAI has moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. He claims that under Altman’s leadership, the organisation has shifted from a non-profit model to a closed-source, profit-driven structure closely linked to Microsoft. Musk says he invested about 100 million dollars in the early years to ensure that AI would not be controlled by a few large corporations. OpenAI and Altman have rejected the claims, calling the lawsuit a distraction driven by competition. They point out that Musk is now building his own AI venture, xAI, which directly competes with OpenAI. According to them, the legal challenge is an attempt to slow down the growth of tools like ChatGPT. Also Read: Iran weighing proposal aimed at satisfying US demands, Trump claims ahead of second round of talks in Pakistan The dispute has its roots in OpenAI’s early years, when Musk, Altman and researchers, including Ilya Sutskever, launched the organisation to counter the growing influence of Google in AI. Rising computing costs later put pressure on the model, and in 2019, Musk left the board after disagreements over control. Soon after, OpenAI created a capped profit structure to attract investment. The launch of ChatGPT in 2022 brought global attention and rapid growth, backed by a reported $13 billion investment from Microsoft. The company also saw internal turmoil in 2023 when Altman was briefly removed and then reinstated after employee backlash. The case, expected to be closely watched when it proceeds on April 27, will test Musk’s claim that he was misled into supporting a project that has now shifted towards profit. OpenAI maintains that the case lacks legal merit and reflects Musk’s own business interests as competition in the AI sector intensifies.

Musk argues that OpenAI has moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.

Musk vs Altman AI clash heads to court on April 27 in OpenAI legal battle

Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI, set for a jury trial on April 27, 2026, alleges that the company abandoned its founding mission to develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity in favor of maximizing profits for Microsoft. The lawsuit seeks to remove CEO Sam Altman, reverse the company's for-profit pivot, and return "ill-gotten gains" to the non-profit. 


Elon Musk Takes OpenAI To Court; What The Lawsuit Alleges?

Elon Musk Versus OpenAI Trial Set To Begin In US 

A shocking study claims that children as young as 13 are being exposed to explicit sexual content on X. Researchers found that even basic searches led to graphic material and the platform’s algorithm continued to push similar content into feeds. With regulators now stepping in, serious questions are being raised about whether social media platforms are doing enough to protect minors online.


Elon Musk's X Exposed In UK? Study Says 13-Year-Olds Are Shown Explicit Content

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has launched a sharp attack on South Africa’s race-based ownership laws, claiming they have prevented his satellite internet service Starlink from operating in the country. In a series of posts on X, Musk described the regulations as “openly racist” and alleged that officials had suggested installing a nominal Black executive to secure approval, an offer he said he refused on principle. “South Africa won’t allow Starlink to be licenced, even though I was born there, simply because I am not Black,” he wrote, adding that such policies were “evil” and should face international sanctions.&nbsp;The dispute centres on South Africa’s Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment policy, introduced after the end of Apartheid in 1994 to address historical inequalities. Under the framework, companies in sectors such as telecommunications are required to ensure significant participation by historically disadvantaged groups, primarily Black South Africans.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-giorgia-meloni-has-halted-italy-s-defence-pact-with-israel-this-is-what-we-know-1776184494116">Why Giorgia Meloni has halted Italy’s defence pact with Israel? This is what we know</a>&nbsp;According to a BBC report, telecom operators must typically meet a threshold of around 30 per cent ownership by such groups to qualify for a licence from the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa. Compliance is assessed across ownership, management control and skills development, and failure to meet the criteria can block market entry.&nbsp;Musk, who was born in Pretoria in 1971, has repeatedly highlighted his South African origins in criticising the policy. He also claimed Starlink had been asked to “bribe” its way into compliance, an allegation not substantiated by authorities.&nbsp;The South African government has pushed back strongly. Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said the country would not alter its regulatory framework to accommodate a single company. “There are currently 193 member states in the United Nations. Surely there is good money to be made out of 192 markets. It is okay to move on,” he was quoted as saying by Business Insider Africa.&nbsp;Clayson Monyela, head of public diplomacy at the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, also rejected Musk’s claims. Quoted by Indy100, he stated that more than 600 US firms operate in South Africa by complying with local laws and insisted that Starlink was welcome, provided it adhered to the rules.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/eric-swalwell-controversy-anna-paulina-luna-video-1776172044244">Anna Paulina alleges jailtime for Eric Swalwell, Brittany Watt maintains silence</a>&nbsp;Despite the standoff, Starlink has not yet formally applied for a licence in South Africa, according to the regulator and reports by Bloomberg and Snopes. Instead, the company has been lobbying for changes to the Black Economic Empowerment framework.&nbsp;In December 2025, Communications Minister Solly Malatsi proposed allowing “equity equivalent investment programmes” as an alternative to the ownership requirement. This would permit foreign firms to invest in local infrastructure and social initiatives rather than transfer equity.&nbsp;Starlink has indicated it would commit around R500 million to connect 5,000 rural schools to high-speed internet if such provisions are implemented. Similar arrangements have previously been used by multinational firms such as Toyota and BMW in South Africa.&nbsp;However, the proposal has divided the coalition government. Leaders within the African National Congress have opposed any dilution of empowerment rules. Parliamentary committee chair Khusela Diko reportedly described the directive as unlawful and questioned whether Starlink would follow through on its commitments.&nbsp;President Cyril Ramaphosa has also defended the policy, stating that calls to scrap Black Economic Empowerment and affirmative action were unrealistic. The row comes amid broader controversy around Musk’s statements on South Africa. He has previously amplified unsubstantiated claims about violence against white citizens, which were echoed by Donald Trump.&nbsp;

Elon Musk accused South Africa of racism, claiming Black ownership laws block Starlink’s license. The government maintains that compliance with post-Apartheid empowerment policies is mandatory for all foreign firms.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has launched a sharp attack on South Africa’s race-based ownership laws, claiming they have prevented his satellite internet service Starlink from operating in the country. In a series of posts on X, Musk described the regulations as “openly racist” and alleged that officials had suggested installing a nominal Black executive to secure approval, an offer he said he refused on principle. “South Africa won’t allow Starlink to be licenced, even though I was born there, simply because I am not Black,” he wrote, adding that such policies were “evil” and should face international sanctions. The dispute centres on South Africa’s Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment policy, introduced after the end of Apartheid in 1994 to address historical inequalities. Under the framework, companies in sectors such as telecommunications are required to ensure significant participation by historically disadvantaged groups, primarily Black South Africans. Also read: Why Giorgia Meloni has halted Italy’s defence pact with Israel? This is what we know According to a BBC report, telecom operators must typically meet a threshold of around 30 per cent ownership by such groups to qualify for a licence from the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa. Compliance is assessed across ownership, management control and skills development, and failure to meet the criteria can block market entry. Musk, who was born in Pretoria in 1971, has repeatedly highlighted his South African origins in criticising the policy. He also claimed Starlink had been asked to “bribe” its way into compliance, an allegation not substantiated by authorities. The South African government has pushed back strongly. Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said the country would not alter its regulatory framework to accommodate a single company. “There are currently 193 member states in the United Nations. Surely there is good money to be made out of 192 markets. It is okay to move on,” he was quoted as saying by Business Insider Africa. Clayson Monyela, head of public diplomacy at the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, also rejected Musk’s claims. Quoted by Indy100, he stated that more than 600 US firms operate in South Africa by complying with local laws and insisted that Starlink was welcome, provided it adhered to the rules. Also read: Anna Paulina alleges jailtime for Eric Swalwell, Brittany Watt maintains silence Despite the standoff, Starlink has not yet formally applied for a licence in South Africa, according to the regulator and reports by Bloomberg and Snopes. Instead, the company has been lobbying for changes to the Black Economic Empowerment framework. In December 2025, Communications Minister Solly Malatsi proposed allowing “equity equivalent investment programmes” as an alternative to the ownership requirement. This would permit foreign firms to invest in local infrastructure and social initiatives rather than transfer equity. Starlink has indicated it would commit around R500 million to connect 5,000 rural schools to high-speed internet if such provisions are implemented. Similar arrangements have previously been used by multinational firms such as Toyota and BMW in South Africa. However, the proposal has divided the coalition government. Leaders within the African National Congress have opposed any dilution of empowerment rules. Parliamentary committee chair Khusela Diko reportedly described the directive as unlawful and questioned whether Starlink would follow through on its commitments. President Cyril Ramaphosa has also defended the policy, stating that calls to scrap Black Economic Empowerment and affirmative action were unrealistic. The row comes amid broader controversy around Musk’s statements on South Africa. He has previously amplified unsubstantiated claims about violence against white citizens, which were echoed by Donald Trump.

Elon Musk accused South Africa of racism, claiming Black ownership laws block Starlink’s license. The government maintains that compliance with post-Apartheid empowerment policies is mandatory for all foreign firms.

Musk calls South Africa racist over Starlink block, alleges it happened because he’s ‘not Black’

Elon Musk criticizes COVID-19 vaccine protocols on X, claiming the second dose "almost sent me to the hospital." He shared his experience with the "Wuhan virus" and his claims that global vaccine dosages were "obviously too high."

Elon Musk criticizes COVID-19 vaccine protocols on X, claiming the second dose "almost sent me to the hospital." He shared his experience with the "Wuhan virus" and his claims that global vaccine dosages were "obviously too high."

Musk re-ignites COVID-19 vaccine debate; calls dosages ‘too high’ following personal health scare

Elon Musk recently shared an interview with Robin Farrow, who wrote a 'hit piece' on Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the artificial intelligence firm behind ChatGPT. In the interview, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist behind the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse exposé that sparked the MeToo movement, said that former associates of Altman described him as a sociopath and a pathological liar. Sharing the interview, the X chief, who was part of the founding team of OpenAI, said this man cannot be trusted with a superpowerful AI.&nbsp;<h2>Sam Altman accused of excessive lying</h2>Musk posted the Farrow interview, in which the journalist from The New Yorker highlighted allegations of repeated dishonesty, exaggeration, and misleading statements to board members and partners by Altman. Farrow claimed that Altman was fired from OpenAI in 2023 - before being reinstated - partly for excessive lying. He also spoke about untested AI models being released to India, and false assurances on AI safety provisions, under Altman. While sharing the interview, Musk wrote: "Not someone you want in charge of superpowerful AI."<h2>Farrow's allegations against Sam Altman</h2>Farrow made several allegations in a piece for the New Yorker, titled "Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?". Written by Farrow along with Andrew Marantz and published on 6 April, the article came after 18 months of reporting and investigation. It is based on interviews with more than 100 people, including former and current OpenAI board members, executives, employees, investors, and colleagues. The article also claims to have reviewed previously undisclosed internal documents. This includes the “Ilya memos”, which contain Ilya Sutskever’s Slack messages and HR documents. Also reviewed were the private notes kept by Dario Amodei, the co-founder of rival AI firm Anthropic. Amodei was previously associated with OpenAI.The article questioned whether Altman can be trusted with control over transformative AI technology, in the context that artificial general intelligence (AGI) could be humanity’s most dangerous invention and thus would require a leader of “uncommon integrity” to run a company like OpenAI.<h2>AI, leadership and integrity: Sam Altman is “unconstrained by the truth”</h2>The article seeks to establish a pattern of deception, manipulation, and prioritisation of power and profit over safety commitments in Altman’s conduct. It claims that this pattern has been repeated across his career, from Loopt to Y Combinator and now OpenAI.Altman allegedly drifted from the AI safety mission, pushing aggressively for deals with businesses and governments.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/openai-brings-chatgpt-to-apple-carplay-for-hands-free-voice-interaction-while-driving-1775153637555">OpenAI brings ChatGPT to Apple CarPlay for hands-free voice interaction while driving</a><h2>Sam Altman had a consistent pattern of lying and misrepresentation</h2>In late 2022, Altman told the board that certain controversial features in an upcoming AI model had been approved by OpenAI’s safety panel. After board member Helen Toner asked for documentation, it turned out that the most controversial features had not been approved.Altman told Mira Murati that ChatGPT's GPT-4 Turbo model didn’t need safety approval, citing general counsel Jason Kwon. However, Kwon later said he was “confused” and had no idea where Altman got that idea. In his private notes, running to more than 200 pages, Dario Amodei documented several incidents, including one involving the 2019 Microsoft deal with OpenAI. Amodei wrote that Altman’s words were “almost certainly bulls***t”.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed</a><h2>The betrayal of OpenAI’s nonprofit and safety mission</h2>Some OpenAI founders, including Altman, privately doubted its nonprofit structure early on, according to the report. Greg Brockman wrote in his diary: "If three months later, we’re doing B-corp, then it was a lie."One researcher reportedly told the board: “OpenAI has been going off the rails on its mission... We are prioritising product and revenue above all else.”<h2>Altman's deception and manipulation go back to his first startup</h2>According to the report, employees at his first start-up, Loopt, went to the board twice asking to fire Altman over a lack of transparency and a tendency for exaggeration. This included claiming he was a “Missouri high-school ping-pong champion” when he was not. He inspired loyalty in others but was accused of blurring the truth.During his time at Y Combinator, partners complained of divided loyalties, with Altman making personal investments while serving as president. Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, reportedly told colleagues Altman “had been lying to us all the time”.Altman was later pushed out as president but resisted and remained listed as chairman in SEC filings until 2021, which he said he was unaware of.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/disney-exits-from-openai-deal-here-s-what-happened-1774549684205">Disney exits from OpenAI deal? Here's what happened</a><h2>Sam Altman's aggressive business dealings with questionable partners, and lobbying against regulation</h2>Altman reportedly sought funding and deals with Gulf autocracies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE for massive data-centre projects, despite security red flags. He internally discussed “playing world powers like China and Russia against each other in a bidding war for AI technology, according to the report. This plan was dropped after employee pushback.At one point, he claimed, without evidence, that China had an “AGI Manhattan Project”.Altman lobbied against AI regulation such as the European Union AI Act and bills in California, even as he publicly supported AI safety, said the report.&nbsp;<h2>Sister's abuse accusations and more: Sam Altman's personal character under scanner</h2>Sources cited in Farrow's reportage and interviews described Altman as having a “sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences”, and a desperate need to be liked.The article notes deeply personal allegations from Altman’s sister Annie, including of sexual abuse, which Altman fought in the courts. He denied the allegations. There were unsubstantiated Silicon Valley rumours involving minors, on which no evidence was found by the New Yorker reporters.<h2>Altman's board coup: He was ousted in 2023, but was reinstated, with limited probe</h2>Altman was fired as OpenAI CEO in 2023 by the board, citing a lack of candour. But he quickly returned to the position after organising a counter-campaign. He made Thrive Capital’s $86 billion investment in OpenAI conditional on his return, among other factors. He was reinstated within five days, with the board that ousted him practically disbanded. The subsequent “independent” WilmerHale review, overseen by new board members chosen in consultation with Altman, produced no written report. An 800-word announcement only cited a “breakdown in trust” without explicitly blaming Altman.<h2>‘Can't change my personality’: Altman’s response to allegations on his leadership, personal qualities</h2>Altman attributed the criticism of him to his avoidance of conflict. He said he “can’t change my personality”, and denied lying.He maintained that OpenAI would continue to run safety projects, “or at least safety-adjacent projects”.He also characterised OpenAI's shift to for-profit operations and aggressive deal-making as normal competitive business rather than a betrayal.The New Yorker article does not portray Altman as cartoonishly evil. It presents a complex, high-achieving figure whose traits led to breakdowns in trust. It suggests he exhibits a “reality-distortion field” and ruthless ambition.

Elon Musk has shared a Robin Farrow interview citing allegations against Sam Altman, appearing to agree with the contents of Farrow's New Yorker ‘hit piece’ on the OpenAI CEO. Altman is accused of dishonesty, with the article questioning his leadership amid AI integrity and safety issues.

Elon Musk recently shared an interview with Robin Farrow, who wrote a 'hit piece' on Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the artificial intelligence firm behind ChatGPT. In the interview, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist behind the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse exposé that sparked the MeToo movement, said that former associates of Altman described him as a sociopath and a pathological liar. Sharing the interview, the X chief, who was part of the founding team of OpenAI, said this man cannot be trusted with a superpowerful AI. Sam Altman accused of excessive lying Musk posted the Farrow interview, in which the journalist from The New Yorker highlighted allegations of repeated dishonesty, exaggeration, and misleading statements to board members and partners by Altman. Farrow claimed that Altman was fired from OpenAI in 2023 - before being reinstated - partly for excessive lying. He also spoke about untested AI models being released to India, and false assurances on AI safety provisions, under Altman. While sharing the interview, Musk wrote: "Not someone you want in charge of superpowerful AI." Farrow's allegations against Sam Altman Farrow made several allegations in a piece for the New Yorker, titled "Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?". Written by Farrow along with Andrew Marantz and published on 6 April, the article came after 18 months of reporting and investigation. It is based on interviews with more than 100 people, including former and current OpenAI board members, executives, employees, investors, and colleagues. The article also claims to have reviewed previously undisclosed internal documents. This includes the “Ilya memos”, which contain Ilya Sutskever’s Slack messages and HR documents. Also reviewed were the private notes kept by Dario Amodei, the co-founder of rival AI firm Anthropic. Amodei was previously associated with OpenAI. The article questioned whether Altman can be trusted with control over transformative AI technology, in the context that artificial general intelligence (AGI) could be humanity’s most dangerous invention and thus would require a leader of “uncommon integrity” to run a company like OpenAI. AI, leadership and integrity: Sam Altman is “unconstrained by the truth” The article seeks to establish a pattern of deception, manipulation, and prioritisation of power and profit over safety commitments in Altman’s conduct. It claims that this pattern has been repeated across his career, from Loopt to Y Combinator and now OpenAI. Altman allegedly drifted from the AI safety mission, pushing aggressively for deals with businesses and governments. Also read: OpenAI brings ChatGPT to Apple CarPlay for hands-free voice interaction while driving Sam Altman had a consistent pattern of lying and misrepresentation In late 2022, Altman told the board that certain controversial features in an upcoming AI model had been approved by OpenAI’s safety panel. After board member Helen Toner asked for documentation, it turned out that the most controversial features had not been approved. Altman told Mira Murati that ChatGPT's GPT-4 Turbo model didn’t need safety approval, citing general counsel Jason Kwon. However, Kwon later said he was “confused” and had no idea where Altman got that idea. In his private notes, running to more than 200 pages, Dario Amodei documented several incidents, including one involving the 2019 Microsoft deal with OpenAI. Amodei wrote that Altman’s words were “almost certainly bulls***t”. https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed The betrayal of OpenAI’s nonprofit and safety mission Some OpenAI founders, including Altman, privately doubted its nonprofit structure early on, according to the report. Greg Brockman wrote in his diary: "If three months later, we’re doing B-corp, then it was a lie." One researcher reportedly told the board: “OpenAI has been going off the rails on its mission... We are prioritising product and revenue above all else.” Altman's deception and manipulation go back to his first startup According to the report, employees at his first start-up, Loopt, went to the board twice asking to fire Altman over a lack of transparency and a tendency for exaggeration. This included claiming he was a “Missouri high-school ping-pong champion” when he was not. He inspired loyalty in others but was accused of blurring the truth. During his time at Y Combinator, partners complained of divided loyalties, with Altman making personal investments while serving as president. Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, reportedly told colleagues Altman “had been lying to us all the time”. Altman was later pushed out as president but resisted and remained listed as chairman in SEC filings until 2021, which he said he was unaware of. Also read: Disney exits from OpenAI deal? Here's what happened Sam Altman's aggressive business dealings with questionable partners, and lobbying against regulation Altman reportedly sought funding and deals with Gulf autocracies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE for massive data-centre projects, despite security red flags. He internally discussed “playing world powers like China and Russia against each other in a bidding war for AI technology, according to the report. This plan was dropped after employee pushback. At one point, he claimed, without evidence, that China had an “AGI Manhattan Project”. Altman lobbied against AI regulation such as the European Union AI Act and bills in California, even as he publicly supported AI safety, said the report. Sister's abuse accusations and more: Sam Altman's personal character under scanner Sources cited in Farrow's reportage and interviews described Altman as having a “sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences”, and a desperate need to be liked. The article notes deeply personal allegations from Altman’s sister Annie, including of sexual abuse, which Altman fought in the courts. He denied the allegations. There were unsubstantiated Silicon Valley rumours involving minors, on which no evidence was found by the New Yorker reporters. Altman's board coup: He was ousted in 2023, but was reinstated, with limited probe Altman was fired as OpenAI CEO in 2023 by the board, citing a lack of candour. But he quickly returned to the position after organising a counter-campaign. He made Thrive Capital’s $86 billion investment in OpenAI conditional on his return, among other factors. He was reinstated within five days, with the board that ousted him practically disbanded. The subsequent “independent” WilmerHale review, overseen by new board members chosen in consultation with Altman, produced no written report. An 800-word announcement only cited a “breakdown in trust” without explicitly blaming Altman. ‘Can't change my personality’: Altman’s response to allegations on his leadership, personal qualities Altman attributed the criticism of him to his avoidance of conflict. He said he “can’t change my personality”, and denied lying. He maintained that OpenAI would continue to run safety projects, “or at least safety-adjacent projects”. He also characterised OpenAI's shift to for-profit operations and aggressive deal-making as normal competitive business rather than a betrayal. The New Yorker article does not portray Altman as cartoonishly evil. It presents a complex, high-achieving figure whose traits led to breakdowns in trust. It suggests he exhibits a “reality-distortion field” and ruthless ambition.

Elon Musk has shared a Robin Farrow interview citing allegations against Sam Altman, appearing to agree with the contents of Farrow's New Yorker ‘hit piece’ on the OpenAI CEO. Altman is accused of dishonesty, with the article questioning his leadership amid AI integrity and safety issues.

Sam Altman a sociopath, pathological liar and abuser? Musk agrees to claims on OpenAI chief's past and leadership

SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, has applied to US regulators for permission to launch up to one million satellites into low-Earth orbit as part of a proposed space-based orbital data-center network. The satellites are expected to support AI computing powered by solar energy in space, dramatically expanding capabilities beyond the existing Starlink system.


Musk's SpaceX Applies to Launch One Million Satellites 

Elon Musk's X platform restricted its AI chatbot Grok amid concerns over misuse, particularly banning its ability to generate or process "undressing" images that simulate removing clothing from photos.


Grok Deepfake Scandal: AI Synthetic Media Raises Trust Fears

SpaceX has confidentially filed for an initial public offering (IPO) that could value the space exploration, satellite internet and AI company led by world's richest person Elon Musk at around $2 trillion. The IPO could raise as much as $75 billion, potentially making it the largest listing in history.&nbsp;<h2>Listing imminent: SpaceX confidential SEC filing</h2>The filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was made on April 1, according to Bloomberg and other reports. The company could go public as early as June, subject to regulatory review and market conditions, said the reports.Reports indicate SpaceX is targeting a valuation above $1.75 trillion, with some estimates approaching $2 trillion. At this level, it would rank among the world’s largest companies, alongside Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and Amazon. It could also surpass Meta and Tesla, the electric vehicle company also led by Musk.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/spacex-crew-12-docks-at-international-space-station-four-new-astronauts-arrive-via-spacex-rocket-1771128001120/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/spacex-crew-12-docks-at-international-space-station-four-new-astronauts-arrive-via-spacex-rocket-1771128001120/embed</a><h2>SpaceX expecting the biggest IPO ever</h2>The IPO could raise between $50 billion and $75 billion, surpassing the previous record set by Saudi Aramco. The Saudi Aramco IPO in 2019 raised about $29.4 billion and valued the company at roughly $1.7 trillion at listing.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/-google-will-win-the-ai-race-in-the-west-china-on-earth-and-spacex-in-space-says-elon-musk-1773990362750">‘Google will win the AI race in the West, China on Earth, and SpaceX in space,’ says Elon Musk</a><h2>Starlink, the real star of SpaceX</h2>SpaceX develops rockets, space exploration systems but Starlink, its satellite internet service, is the primary revenue driver. It generates more than two-thirds of the company’s total revenue by providing internet connectivity via low-Earth orbit satellites. SpaceX is estimated to have generated around $15–16 billion in revenue in 2025, with EBITDA of approximately $7.5 billion. The company recently entered into a $19.6 billion spectrum deal with EchoStar to expand its direct-to-cell capabilities.Reusable rockets such as Falcon 9 underpin SpaceX’s dominance in commercial and government launches. Future growth is expected to depend heavily on the success of Starship, the company’s next-generation rocket designed for Mars missions and large-scale satellite deployment.<h2>xAI deal adds AI angle to SpaceX products and services</h2>SpaceX’s integration with xAI, the artificial intelligence venture behind the popular Grok chatbot, values the combined entity at approximately $1.25 trillion and adds an AI dimension to its broader space and communications strategy.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-is-autonomous-drone-swarming-tech-musk-s-spacex-xai-place-bids-in-secret-pentagon-competition-wion-explains-1771301948635">What is autonomous drone swarming tech? Musk's SpaceX, xAI bid in secret Pentagon competition | WION Explains</a><h2>Analysts think the stock could perform well long term, but risks remain</h2>SpaceX is expected to list at a high valuation, with analysts such as PitchBook and Morningstar suggesting it could trade at more than 90 times revenue. However, they argue that over a five to seven year period, the valuation could be justified if Starship development succeeds and Starlink continues its rapid expansion.Risks include delays in Starship development, regulatory challenges, limited public financial disclosure. The broader market volatility and selling pressure from early investors after the IPO could also hit the stock.SpaceX’s IPO could mark a historic moment, bringing its combined strengths in space launch, satellite internet, and AI-linked infrastructure into public markets, provided it delivers on its ambitious growth expectations.

SpaceX has confidentially filed for IPO that could value the company near $2 trillion and raise up to $75 billion, reports said. The valuation is being driven by Starlink internet growth and long-term space and AI ambitions that includes Mars exploration

SpaceX has confidentially filed for an initial public offering (IPO) that could value the space exploration, satellite internet and AI company led by world's richest person Elon Musk at around $2 trillion. The IPO could raise as much as $75 billion, potentially making it the largest listing in history. Listing imminent: SpaceX confidential SEC filing The filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was made on April 1, according to Bloomberg and other reports. The company could go public as early as June, subject to regulatory review and market conditions, said the reports. Reports indicate SpaceX is targeting a valuation above $1.75 trillion, with some estimates approaching $2 trillion. At this level, it would rank among the world’s largest companies, alongside Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and Amazon. It could also surpass Meta and Tesla, the electric vehicle company also led by Musk. https://www.wionews.com/videos/spacex-crew-12-docks-at-international-space-station-four-new-astronauts-arrive-via-spacex-rocket-1771128001120/embed SpaceX expecting the biggest IPO ever The IPO could raise between $50 billion and $75 billion, surpassing the previous record set by Saudi Aramco. The Saudi Aramco IPO in 2019 raised about $29.4 billion and valued the company at roughly $1.7 trillion at listing. Also read: ‘Google will win the AI race in the West, China on Earth, and SpaceX in space,’ says Elon Musk Starlink, the real star of SpaceX SpaceX develops rockets, space exploration systems but Starlink, its satellite internet service, is the primary revenue driver. It generates more than two-thirds of the company’s total revenue by providing internet connectivity via low-Earth orbit satellites. SpaceX is estimated to have generated around $15–16 billion in revenue in 2025, with EBITDA of approximately $7.5 billion. The company recently entered into a $19.6 billion spectrum deal with EchoStar to expand its direct-to-cell capabilities. Reusable rockets such as Falcon 9 underpin SpaceX’s dominance in commercial and government launches. Future growth is expected to depend heavily on the success of Starship, the company’s next-generation rocket designed for Mars missions and large-scale satellite deployment. xAI deal adds AI angle to SpaceX products and services SpaceX’s integration with xAI, the artificial intelligence venture behind the popular Grok chatbot, values the combined entity at approximately $1.25 trillion and adds an AI dimension to its broader space and communications strategy. Also read: What is autonomous drone swarming tech? Musk's SpaceX, xAI bid in secret Pentagon competition | WION Explains Analysts think the stock could perform well long term, but risks remain SpaceX is expected to list at a high valuation, with analysts such as PitchBook and Morningstar suggesting it could trade at more than 90 times revenue. However, they argue that over a five to seven year period, the valuation could be justified if Starship development succeeds and Starlink continues its rapid expansion. Risks include delays in Starship development, regulatory challenges, limited public financial disclosure. The broader market volatility and selling pressure from early investors after the IPO could also hit the stock. SpaceX’s IPO could mark a historic moment, bringing its combined strengths in space launch, satellite internet, and AI-linked infrastructure into public markets, provided it delivers on its ambitious growth expectations.

SpaceX has confidentially filed for IPO that could value the company near $2 trillion and raise up to $75 billion, reports said. The valuation is being driven by Starlink internet growth and long-term space and AI ambitions that includes Mars exploration

'$2 trillion valuation': SpaceX blockbuster IPO could raise $75 billion, say reports

Elon Musk’s social media platform X came under fire on April 1 after confusion spread rapidly over several viral posts claiming that the platform had disabled the ability to copy video links. The claims quickly gained attention as users reported that they were unable to share videos via direct links, resulting in a widespread concern among netzines about the possible changes. Several posts, some garnering millions of views, claimed that X had secretly disabled the ability to copy video links, with a few even suggesting the change was deliberate and aimed at certain content, such as political videos. Memes quickly spread across the platform, fueling concerns that a new restriction had been introduced.<h3>Fact or prank?</h3>So what actually happened? Did X, formerly known as Twitter, really remove this feature for millions of users? The truth is that the option to copy and share video links on X remains unchanged. The viral claim that gained massive traction overnight appears to have been nothing more than an April Fool’s Day prank, as users can still access and use the feature as usual.<h3>How does it all begin?</h3>The confusion started with a single post from a user, which rapidly went viral. It seems to have been part of an April Fool’s joke designed to drive engagement, a tactic often used on the platform to attract views and, in some cases, generate revenue. Several accounts on the X, along with some with a premium badge, pranked the netizens on April Fool’s Day to get millions of views. When we verified the information independently, it was discovered that the feature to copy video links is still available on the social media platform X and works just fine.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">You can’t Copy the link of a video anymore on X: <a href="https://t.co/DbPHYXE02l">pic.twitter.com/DbPHYXE02l</a>&mdash; Pintu (@Pintuu0) <a href="https://twitter.com/Pintuu0/status/2039536567610695702?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">You can no longer copy the link of a video anymore on X <a href="https://t.co/gfxCbYsBdr">pic.twitter.com/gfxCbYsBdr</a>&mdash; sachin. (@sachinyadav699) <a href="https://twitter.com/sachinyadav699/status/2039515768648618044?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The episode underscores how rapidly misinformation can spread on social media, especially when it coincides with April Fools’ Day, even when no actual changes have occurred. The claims may have begun as a joke, but the viral post still briefly led many users to believe that an important feature had been removed.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/love-returns-why-iranian-couples-resuming-weddings-after-postponements-amid-war-1774975118484">Love returns: Why Iranian couples resuming weddings after postponements amid war?</a>

Several posts on X garnering millions of views claimed that the platform has secretly disabled the ability to copy video links, with a few even suggesting the change was deliberate and aimed at certain content, such as political videos.

Elon Musk’s social media platform X came under fire on April 1 after confusion spread rapidly over several viral posts claiming that the platform had disabled the ability to copy video links. The claims quickly gained attention as users reported that they were unable to share videos via direct links, resulting in a widespread concern among netzines about the possible changes. Several posts, some garnering millions of views, claimed that X had secretly disabled the ability to copy video links, with a few even suggesting the change was deliberate and aimed at certain content, such as political videos. Memes quickly spread across the platform, fueling concerns that a new restriction had been introduced. Fact or prank? So what actually happened? Did X, formerly known as Twitter, really remove this feature for millions of users? The truth is that the option to copy and share video links on X remains unchanged. The viral claim that gained massive traction overnight appears to have been nothing more than an April Fool’s Day prank, as users can still access and use the feature as usual. How does it all begin? The confusion started with a single post from a user, which rapidly went viral. It seems to have been part of an April Fool’s joke designed to drive engagement, a tactic often used on the platform to attract views and, in some cases, generate revenue. Several accounts on the X, along with some with a premium badge, pranked the netizens on April Fool’s Day to get millions of views. When we verified the information independently, it was discovered that the feature to copy video links is still available on the social media platform X and works just fine.

Several posts on X garnering millions of views claimed that the platform has secretly disabled the ability to copy video links, with a few even suggesting the change was deliberate and aimed at certain content, such as political videos.

Feature update or April Fool’s prank? Viral video rumours baffle X users over link copying issue

The Indian government on Saturday (March 28, 2026) refuted the claim that billionaire Elon Musk was involved in the call between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which took place on March 24 to discuss the war with Iran. This has been four weeks into the US-Israel-Iran war, and still there are no such signs of ending the escalation, even after giving a 15-point ceasefire plan to Tehran by America. "We have seen the story. The telephone conversation on 24 March was between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump only," a spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs said. "As has been stated earlier, it provided the opportunity for exchange of views on the situation in West Asia," the spokesperson added. The denial of India followed after the New York Times quoted unnamed US officials claiming that Musk participated in the phone call between the two leaders. "Elon Musk participated in a phone call on Tuesday with President Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, an unusual appearance by a private citizen on a call between two heads of state during a wartime crisis," the New York Times reported. Donald Trump and Elon Musk reportedly had a fallout last year after the billionaire left his government role, where he had been assigned to reduce the workforce. The report added that it remains unclear why Musk was present on the call or whether he actively participated.<h3>PM Modi describes diplomatic conversation</h3>In a post on X, Prime Minister Narendra Modi described the diplomatic conversation, noting that both sides emphasised the need for a Strait of Hormuz that is “open, secure, and accessible,” while reaffirming India’s position in favour of de-escalation and peace in the region. "Received a call from President Trump and had a useful exchange of views on the situation in West Asia. India supports de-escalation and restoration of peace at the earliest. Ensuring that the Strait of Hormuz remains open, secure and accessible is essential for the whole world. We agreed to stay in touch regarding efforts towards peace and stability," the PM said in his post. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Friday that he expects Iran to engage in talks with Washington soon, expressing hope that discussions could take place within the week. Speaking at a business forum in Miami, he added that the US is awaiting Iran’s response to a 15-point peace proposal, which he believes could potentially resolve the conflict.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/houthis-launch-first-attack-on-israel-since-outbreak-of-iran-war-fire-ballistic-missiles-1774700386350">Houthis launch first attack on Israel since outbreak of Iran war, fire ballistic missiles</a>

India's denial followed after the New York Times quoted unnamed US officials claiming that Elon Musk participated in the phone call between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The Indian government on Saturday (March 28, 2026) refuted the claim that billionaire Elon Musk was involved in the call between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which took place on March 24 to discuss the war with Iran. This has been four weeks into the US-Israel-Iran war, and still there are no such signs of ending the escalation, even after giving a 15-point ceasefire plan to Tehran by America. "We have seen the story. The telephone conversation on 24 March was between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump only," a spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs said. "As has been stated earlier, it provided the opportunity for exchange of views on the situation in West Asia," the spokesperson added. The denial of India followed after the New York Times quoted unnamed US officials claiming that Musk participated in the phone call between the two leaders. "Elon Musk participated in a phone call on Tuesday with President Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, an unusual appearance by a private citizen on a call between two heads of state during a wartime crisis," the New York Times reported. Donald Trump and Elon Musk reportedly had a fallout last year after the billionaire left his government role, where he had been assigned to reduce the workforce. The report added that it remains unclear why Musk was present on the call or whether he actively participated. PM Modi describes diplomatic conversation In a post on X, Prime Minister Narendra Modi described the diplomatic conversation, noting that both sides emphasised the need for a Strait of Hormuz that is “open, secure, and accessible,” while reaffirming India’s position in favour of de-escalation and peace in the region. "Received a call from President Trump and had a useful exchange of views on the situation in West Asia. India supports de-escalation and restoration of peace at the earliest. Ensuring that the Strait of Hormuz remains open, secure and accessible is essential for the whole world. We agreed to stay in touch regarding efforts towards peace and stability," the PM said in his post. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Friday that he expects Iran to engage in talks with Washington soon, expressing hope that discussions could take place within the week. Speaking at a business forum in Miami, he added that the US is awaiting Iran’s response to a 15-point peace proposal, which he believes could potentially resolve the conflict. Also read: Houthis launch first attack on Israel since outbreak of Iran war, fire ballistic missiles

India's denial followed after the New York Times quoted unnamed US officials claiming that Elon Musk participated in the phone call between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

India denies Elon Musk’s role in Modi-Trump phone call on West Asia war

elon-musk

Elon Musk, News on Elon Musk, stories on Elon Musk, articles on Elon Musk, Elon Musk stories at Wion, Elon Musk news, Elon Musk latest news

elon musk

Elon Musk’s SpaceXAI sees talent exits after merger: Why AI engineers are leaving SpaceXAI

Musk Vs OpenAI: Musk's Lawyer Calls Altman Untrustworthy In Court

Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun is smitten as he takes a selfie with his rival Musk - Watch

Elon Musk goes viral for spinning and filming like a tourist in China visit