National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

In New Zealand, Hakyung Lee, a mother of two, has been found guilty of killing her children and stashing their bodies in suitcases. On Tuesday (Sep 23), the ruling in the high-profile case that came to be known as the ‘New Zealand suitcase murders’ was announced. The gruesome murder drew international attention and shocked many with its horrific details. Lee, "in sound mind, deliberately murdered" her children, eight-year-old Yuna Jo and six-year-old Minu Jo, before stuffing their corpses into suitcases, noted the prosecutor in her summary. What could cause a mother to murder her own children? Horrifying details of the 'Suicide murders' here.<h2>Why did Hakyung Lee kill her children?</h2>The mother of two, as per reports, went into depression after her husband Ian Jo was diagnosed with cancer in 2017. Within five months of the diagnosis, he died, leaving behind Lee and their two children.According to reports, in the lead-up to Jo's death, the mother of two on several occasions had suggested that she and her children would also die if he did. She had allegedly also texted him saying, "if you die I will die along with our two kids". She had even told her friend that she would've been less sad if the children had died instead of her husband Ian Jo.<h2>The horrifying way in which the bodies were discovered</h2>According to a BBC report, on 10 August 2022, two people in New Zealand won an auction for an abandoned storage locker. They purchased the abandoned locker, which was filled with household items including bikes, clothing and two suitcases for $401 New Zealand dollars ($238). Later, they made a horrifying discovery - the bodies of two children tightly wrapped in plastic bags stuffed inside the suitcases.The children were identified as Yuna Jo and Minu Jo, who were eight and six when they were killed, and the storage locker was found to belong to their mother Hakyung Lee.Autopsy of the corpses found no signs of trauma, but traces of Nortriptyline, an antidepressant were found in the chest cavity and liver of both the kids. The drug was prescribed to Lee when she told a doctor that she had trouble sleeping and felt dizzy following her husband's cancer diagnosis.<h2>How was Lee arrested?</h2>Lee was arrested in September 2022 in Ulsan, South Korea, after a global red notice was released against her. Prosecutors at the beginning of her trial alleged that Lee changed her name and relocated to South Korea a month after killing her children.Hakyung Lee's lawyers argued that the death of her husband in 2017 had sent her into a depressive spiral. A forensic psychiatrist testified that she had experienced deep depression, suicidal thoughts, and guilt, and that she believed ending her children’s lives was the morally right action.The prosecution, however, presented a contrasting narrative. They pointed to Lee’s efforts to conceal the bodies, her decision to leave the country, and steps she had taken to distance herself from her previous life — including changing her name and severing ties with New Zealand — as evidence that she knew her actions were wrong.&nbsp;

WION Explains | The gory details of New Zealand’s gruesome suitcase murders, which saw a mother kill her two children and abandon their bodies stuffed in suitcases. All you need to know.

In New Zealand, Hakyung Lee, a mother of two, has been found guilty of killing her children and stashing their bodies in suitcases. On Tuesday (Sep 23), the ruling in the high-profile case that came to be known as the ‘New Zealand suitcase murders’ was announced. The gruesome murder drew international attention and shocked many with its horrific details. Lee, "in sound mind, deliberately murdered" her children, eight-year-old Yuna Jo and six-year-old Minu Jo, before stuffing their corpses into suitcases, noted the prosecutor in her summary. What could cause a mother to murder her own children? Horrifying details of the 'Suicide murders' here. Why did Hakyung Lee kill her children? The mother of two, as per reports, went into depression after her husband Ian Jo was diagnosed with cancer in 2017. Within five months of the diagnosis, he died, leaving behind Lee and their two children. According to reports, in the lead-up to Jo's death, the mother of two on several occasions had suggested that she and her children would also die if he did. She had allegedly also texted him saying, "if you die I will die along with our two kids". She had even told her friend that she would've been less sad if the children had died instead of her husband Ian Jo. The horrifying way in which the bodies were discovered According to a BBC report, on 10 August 2022, two people in New Zealand won an auction for an abandoned storage locker. They purchased the abandoned locker, which was filled with household items including bikes, clothing and two suitcases for $401 New Zealand dollars ($238). Later, they made a horrifying discovery - the bodies of two children tightly wrapped in plastic bags stuffed inside the suitcases. The children were identified as Yuna Jo and Minu Jo, who were eight and six when they were killed, and the storage locker was found to belong to their mother Hakyung Lee. Autopsy of the corpses found no signs of trauma, but traces of Nortriptyline, an antidepressant were found in the chest cavity and liver of both the kids. The drug was prescribed to Lee when she told a doctor that she had trouble sleeping and felt dizzy following her husband's cancer diagnosis. How was Lee arrested? Lee was arrested in September 2022 in Ulsan, South Korea, after a global red notice was released against her. Prosecutors at the beginning of her trial alleged that Lee changed her name and relocated to South Korea a month after killing her children. Hakyung Lee's lawyers argued that the death of her husband in 2017 had sent her into a depressive spiral. A forensic psychiatrist testified that she had experienced deep depression, suicidal thoughts, and guilt, and that she believed ending her children’s lives was the morally right action. The prosecution, however, presented a contrasting narrative. They pointed to Lee’s efforts to conceal the bodies, her decision to leave the country, and steps she had taken to distance herself from her previous life — including changing her name and severing ties with New Zealand — as evidence that she knew her actions were wrong.

WION Explains | The gory details of New Zealand’s gruesome suitcase murders, which saw a mother kill her two children and abandon their bodies stuffed in suitcases. All you need to know.

WION explains New Zealand's suitcase murders: Gory details of the chilling case of a mother, her children, and a dark secret

Donald Trump’s presidency is not a series of random events; it’s an intricate and disturbing strategy. A strategy, yes, but one fueled less by a coherent vision of governance and more by a relentless drive to cement his own power at any cost. In his world, reality bends to his will, and the American public must learn to live with a constant churn of crisis, controversy, and chaos. The events of just one day—a tweet demanding the prosecution of his political foes, a press release undermining decades of public health consensus, and an attack on free speech—illustrate how Trump continues to hold his loyal base in a near-messianic grip.&nbsp;For the vast majority of Americans, Trump’s willingness to flout established norms is deeply troubling. His rhetoric and actions undermine the very institutions that underpin our democracy. On Monday (September 22), for instance, he announced a new government stance linking the use of acetaminophen during pregnancy to a significant increase in autism risk—an assertion that flies in the face of what scientific experts have spent years trying to communicate. His comments, once again, leave a lasting impact on public health policy. But for his supporters, it’s not about scientific integrity; it’s about defying what they see as the expert “elite".&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/h1-b-visa-fee-hike-is-a-trade-barrier-legal-argument-for-india-to-sue-the-us-at-the-wto-in-a-world-first-under-mode-4-of-gats-1758608807223">H1-B visa fee hike is a trade barrier: Legal argument for India to sue the US at the WTO in a world-first under Mode 4 of GATS</a>&nbsp;Trump’s deep disdain for science is no accident. By giving a platform to figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a well-known skeptic of vaccines—he continues to nurture a base that thrives on anti-establishment sentiment. This isn’t just a personal vendetta against experts; it’s a political calculation. The alliance with vaccine skeptics and anti-science activists taps into a vein of distrust and frustration that has only grown since the pandemic. What’s more, it solidifies his position as the figurehead of a movement that seeks to upend the establishment—not by offering a better alternative, but by destabilising everything it touches.&nbsp;For many, these moves might appear reckless, even harmful. It’s easy to see them as the caprices of a president with little regard for the common good. But this chaotic approach is calculated. It resonates deeply with voters who feel left behind by both parties, who view the “elite” as not just out of touch, but actively working against them. Trump’s entire political brand is built on the idea that he is not the one who is broken, but that it’s the system—the courts, the media, the scientific establishment—that needs to be fixed.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-is-tylenol-fda-issues-letter-to-physicians-alerting-about-drug-after-trump-s-warning-against-its-usage-1758612188946">What is Tylenol? FDA issues letter to physicians alerting about drug after Trump's warning against its usage</a>&nbsp;In the warped logic of his politics, every conspiracy theory, every unsubstantiated claim, becomes not just a defense of his presidency, but a validation of his populist message. Nowhere is this more evident than in his attacks on the legal system. The call for Attorney General Pam Bondi to begin prosecuting his political adversaries, despite a glaring lack of evidence, is not just reckless; it’s a dangerous weaponization of the justice system. Trump’s interference in legal matters, including the removal of prosecutors who refuse to charge his political enemies, has the potential to erode the very foundation of American democracy. The impartiality of the law, once thought to be a cornerstone of our system, becomes a casualty in his quest to settle scores.&nbsp;Yet, Trump’s base sees it differently. To them, these actions aren’t signs of tyranny; they are proof that he is unafraid to take on the entrenched interests that have long held power in Washington. The more Trump challenges the norms, the more his followers view him as a fighter—someone who will “drain the swamp” and expose the corruption they believe festers in the halls of power. This dynamic, in which Trump positions himself as the defender of the “little guy” against the Washington elite, is what keeps his support base loyal, even as the rest of the country recoils.&nbsp;This strategy is not only about Trump; it’s about fostering a deep mistrust of anything labeled “official” or “mainstream.” In undermining science, questioning the legitimacy of the legal system, and attacking the media, Trump is shaping a world in which truth becomes malleable, and loyalty to him becomes the only constant. For his supporters, the very chaos he creates is proof of his commitment to confronting the “corrupt elites.” It’s a strategy that keeps his base energised, but one that poses grave risks to the fabric of American governance.

Donald Trump’s dangerous dance: Destabilising democracy to stay in power

Donald Trump’s presidency is not a series of random events; it’s an intricate and disturbing strategy. A strategy, yes, but one fueled less by a coherent vision of governance and more by a relentless drive to cement his own power at any cost. In his world, reality bends to his will, and the American public must learn to live with a constant churn of crisis, controversy, and chaos. The events of just one day—a tweet demanding the prosecution of his political foes, a press release undermining decades of public health consensus, and an attack on free speech—illustrate how Trump continues to hold his loyal base in a near-messianic grip. For the vast majority of Americans, Trump’s willingness to flout established norms is deeply troubling. His rhetoric and actions undermine the very institutions that underpin our democracy. On Monday (September 22), for instance, he announced a new government stance linking the use of acetaminophen during pregnancy to a significant increase in autism risk—an assertion that flies in the face of what scientific experts have spent years trying to communicate. His comments, once again, leave a lasting impact on public health policy. But for his supporters, it’s not about scientific integrity; it’s about defying what they see as the expert “elite". Also Read: H1-B visa fee hike is a trade barrier: Legal argument for India to sue the US at the WTO in a world-first under Mode 4 of GATS Trump’s deep disdain for science is no accident. By giving a platform to figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a well-known skeptic of vaccines—he continues to nurture a base that thrives on anti-establishment sentiment. This isn’t just a personal vendetta against experts; it’s a political calculation. The alliance with vaccine skeptics and anti-science activists taps into a vein of distrust and frustration that has only grown since the pandemic. What’s more, it solidifies his position as the figurehead of a movement that seeks to upend the establishment—not by offering a better alternative, but by destabilising everything it touches. For many, these moves might appear reckless, even harmful. It’s easy to see them as the caprices of a president with little regard for the common good. But this chaotic approach is calculated. It resonates deeply with voters who feel left behind by both parties, who view the “elite” as not just out of touch, but actively working against them. Trump’s entire political brand is built on the idea that he is not the one who is broken, but that it’s the system—the courts, the media, the scientific establishment—that needs to be fixed. Also Read: What is Tylenol? FDA issues letter to physicians alerting about drug after Trump's warning against its usage In the warped logic of his politics, every conspiracy theory, every unsubstantiated claim, becomes not just a defense of his presidency, but a validation of his populist message. Nowhere is this more evident than in his attacks on the legal system. The call for Attorney General Pam Bondi to begin prosecuting his political adversaries, despite a glaring lack of evidence, is not just reckless; it’s a dangerous weaponization of the justice system. Trump’s interference in legal matters, including the removal of prosecutors who refuse to charge his political enemies, has the potential to erode the very foundation of American democracy. The impartiality of the law, once thought to be a cornerstone of our system, becomes a casualty in his quest to settle scores. Yet, Trump’s base sees it differently. To them, these actions aren’t signs of tyranny; they are proof that he is unafraid to take on the entrenched interests that have long held power in Washington. The more Trump challenges the norms, the more his followers view him as a fighter—someone who will “drain the swamp” and expose the corruption they believe festers in the halls of power. This dynamic, in which Trump positions himself as the defender of the “little guy” against the Washington elite, is what keeps his support base loyal, even as the rest of the country recoils. This strategy is not only about Trump; it’s about fostering a deep mistrust of anything labeled “official” or “mainstream.” In undermining science, questioning the legitimacy of the legal system, and attacking the media, Trump is shaping a world in which truth becomes malleable, and loyalty to him becomes the only constant. For his supporters, the very chaos he creates is proof of his commitment to confronting the “corrupt elites.” It’s a strategy that keeps his base energised, but one that poses grave risks to the fabric of American governance.

Donald Trump's strategy destabilises democracy, undermining science, the legal system, and media to solidify his power, fostering chaos to rally his loyal base

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Tuesday (September 23) criticised Donald Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro, after his recent comments targeting India, calling them unnecessary at a time when relations between the two countries were improving. Navarro, a senior White House counsellor, had described India as the “maharaja of tariffs” and a “laundromat of Russia”. He also referred to the Ukraine war as “Modi’s war” and claimed “Brahmins are profiteering at the expense of the Indian people”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-300m-a-plane-what-makes-the-f-47-the-costliest-fighter-jet-yet-how-fast-will-it-be-and-when-will-it-fly-1758611888758">$300m a plane: What makes the F-47 the costliest fighter jet yet? How fast will it be, and when will it fly?</a>Speaking to ANI, Tharoor said the language was “extremely offensive” and had created a backlash across India. “If there’s no particular problem in a relationship of 30 years, which has been getting toward greater closeness, why would you use this kind of language about India? This was not at all appreciated,” he said.<h2>Why have tariffs become a flashpoint?</h2>Tharoor argued that Donald Trump sees tariffs as a tool not only for trade but also for politics. “What went wrong to begin with is that Trump has this idea that tariffs are the magic instruments to solve a number of his problems,” he explained.“He feels that too many things that were manufactured in America are now being imported. He wants to make that more expensive so that the American manufacturer will start doing things more in America and employ American workers, who are his base,” Trump said. US president imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports in August and later added another 25 per cent penalty over India’s purchases of Russian oil.<h2>‘Insults made it worse’</h2>Tharoor said tariffs themselves had already caused resentment in India but Navarro’s remarks deepened the divide. “The unfairness of imposition of tariffs has definitely created a very strong backlash in India, and the accompanying insults, both by Trump’s own language and Navarro’s statements, have gotten a backlash across the country,” he said.<h2>India–US ties under strain</h2>India and the US have grown closer over the last three decades, particularly in defence, technology and trade. Tharoor said that this made the sharp language from Trump’s team especially jarring. “This was not at all appreciated,” he repeated, adding that both the tariffs and the rhetoric had damaged goodwill in New Delhi.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor condemned Donald Trump’s adviser Peter Navarro for calling India the “maharaja of tariffs” and a “laundromat of Russia”, saying the offensive remarks and tariffs have strained India–US relations.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Tuesday (September 23) criticised Donald Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro, after his recent comments targeting India, calling them unnecessary at a time when relations between the two countries were improving. Navarro, a senior White House counsellor, had described India as the “maharaja of tariffs” and a “laundromat of Russia”. He also referred to the Ukraine war as “Modi’s war” and claimed “Brahmins are profiteering at the expense of the Indian people”. Also read: $300m a plane: What makes the F-47 the costliest fighter jet yet? How fast will it be, and when will it fly? Speaking to ANI, Tharoor said the language was “extremely offensive” and had created a backlash across India. “If there’s no particular problem in a relationship of 30 years, which has been getting toward greater closeness, why would you use this kind of language about India? This was not at all appreciated,” he said. Why have tariffs become a flashpoint? Tharoor argued that Donald Trump sees tariffs as a tool not only for trade but also for politics. “What went wrong to begin with is that Trump has this idea that tariffs are the magic instruments to solve a number of his problems,” he explained. “He feels that too many things that were manufactured in America are now being imported. He wants to make that more expensive so that the American manufacturer will start doing things more in America and employ American workers, who are his base,” Trump said. US president imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports in August and later added another 25 per cent penalty over India’s purchases of Russian oil. ‘Insults made it worse’ Tharoor said tariffs themselves had already caused resentment in India but Navarro’s remarks deepened the divide. “The unfairness of imposition of tariffs has definitely created a very strong backlash in India, and the accompanying insults, both by Trump’s own language and Navarro’s statements, have gotten a backlash across the country,” he said. India–US ties under strain India and the US have grown closer over the last three decades, particularly in defence, technology and trade. Tharoor said that this made the sharp language from Trump’s team especially jarring. “This was not at all appreciated,” he repeated, adding that both the tariffs and the rhetoric had damaged goodwill in New Delhi.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor condemned Donald Trump’s adviser Peter Navarro for calling India the “maharaja of tariffs” and a “laundromat of Russia”, saying the offensive remarks and tariffs have strained India–US relations.

'Extremely offensive, not at all appreciated': Shashi Tharoor says Trump’s tariffs and Navarro’s insults have damaged goodwill in New Delhi

The Chinese city of Shenzhen was preparing Monday to evacuate 400,000 people while residents of the northern Philippines sought shelter from gale-force winds as Super Typhoon Ragasa headed on a collision course with southern China. The typhoon made landfall on the Philippines' Calayan Island, part of the sparsely populated Babuyan chain, at 3:00 pm (0700 GMT), according to the Philippine weather service.&nbsp;As of 8:00 pm (1200 GMT), the storm was generating maximum sustained winds of 215 kilometres per hour (134 mph) near its centre and gusts of up to 265 kph, the national weather service said. "I woke up because of the strong wind. It was hitting the windows, and it sounded like a machine that was switched on," said Tirso Tugagao, a resident of Aparri, a coastal town in northern Cagayan province.&nbsp;On Calayan Island, at the storm's centre, information officer Herbert Singun told AFP that chunks of a school roof had been ripped off and landed on an evacuation centre about 30 metres (yards) away, causing one minor injury.&nbsp;"Can you see those coconut trees swaying in the distance?" he asked during a video chat. “There were eight of them before. Now only four are still standing. That goes to show how strong this typhoon is.” Just over 10,000 Filipinos were evacuated across the country, with schools and government offices closed Monday in the Manila region and across 29 other provinces.&nbsp;<h2>Empty supermarket shelves&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;A much larger operation will take place in China's Shenzhen, where authorities said they planned to move hundreds of thousands of people from coastal and low-lying regions. Shenzhen residents hurried to stock up on supplies ahead of the storm's arrival.In the city's Bao'an district, long checkout queues formed at a bustling supermarket whose shelves were largely empty of fresh meat and vegetables Monday evening, AFP journalists saw.&nbsp;A supermarket employee told AFP that bread had already sold out by midday. "It's not normally like this," he said.Several other cities in Guangdong province announced that classes and work would be cancelled and public transportation suspended because of the typhoon.&nbsp;Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific said it expected to cancel more than 500 flights as Ragasa threatened the financial hub.A spokeswoman for the airline said passenger flights in and out of Hong Kong International Airport would be halted from 6:00 pm Tuesday, "resuming during daytime hours on Thursday".<h2> 'Extremely torrential'&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;In Taiwan, the state weather service predicted "extremely torrential rain" in the country's east."Its storm radius is quite large, about 320 (kilometres). Although the typhoon's centre is still some distance away, its wide, strong wind field and outer circulation are already affecting parts of Taiwan," it said.&nbsp;James Wu, a local fire department officer, told AFP that evacuations were underway in mountainous areas near Pingtung."What worries us more is that the damage could be similar to what happened during Typhoon Koinu two years ago," he added, describing a storm that saw utility poles collapse and sheet-metal roofs sent flying into the air.Philippine government weather specialist John Grender Almario said Sunday that "severe flooding and landslides" could be expected in the northern areas of the main island Luzon.&nbsp;The threat of flooding from Ragasa comes just a day after thousands of Filipinos took to the streets to protest a corruption scandal involving flood control projects that were shabbily constructed or never completed.&nbsp;The Philippines is the first major landmass facing the Pacific cyclone belt, and the archipelago is hit by an average of 20 storms and typhoons each year, putting millions of people in disaster-prone areas in a state of constant poverty.Scientists warn that storms are becoming more powerful as the world warms due to the effects of human-driven climate change.&nbsp;&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

As Super Typhoon Ragasa made landfall on the Philippines' Calayan Island, China prepares to evacuate 400,000  people.

The Chinese city of Shenzhen was preparing Monday to evacuate 400,000 people while residents of the northern Philippines sought shelter from gale-force winds as Super Typhoon Ragasa headed on a collision course with southern China. The typhoon made landfall on the Philippines' Calayan Island, part of the sparsely populated Babuyan chain, at 3:00 pm (0700 GMT), according to the Philippine weather service. As of 8:00 pm (1200 GMT), the storm was generating maximum sustained winds of 215 kilometres per hour (134 mph) near its centre and gusts of up to 265 kph, the national weather service said. "I woke up because of the strong wind. It was hitting the windows, and it sounded like a machine that was switched on," said Tirso Tugagao, a resident of Aparri, a coastal town in northern Cagayan province. On Calayan Island, at the storm's centre, information officer Herbert Singun told AFP that chunks of a school roof had been ripped off and landed on an evacuation centre about 30 metres (yards) away, causing one minor injury. "Can you see those coconut trees swaying in the distance?" he asked during a video chat. “There were eight of them before. Now only four are still standing. That goes to show how strong this typhoon is.” Just over 10,000 Filipinos were evacuated across the country, with schools and government offices closed Monday in the Manila region and across 29 other provinces. Empty supermarket shelves A much larger operation will take place in China's Shenzhen, where authorities said they planned to move hundreds of thousands of people from coastal and low-lying regions. Shenzhen residents hurried to stock up on supplies ahead of the storm's arrival. In the city's Bao'an district, long checkout queues formed at a bustling supermarket whose shelves were largely empty of fresh meat and vegetables Monday evening, AFP journalists saw. A supermarket employee told AFP that bread had already sold out by midday. "It's not normally like this," he said. Several other cities in Guangdong province announced that classes and work would be cancelled and public transportation suspended because of the typhoon. Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific said it expected to cancel more than 500 flights as Ragasa threatened the financial hub. A spokeswoman for the airline said passenger flights in and out of Hong Kong International Airport would be halted from 6:00 pm Tuesday, "resuming during daytime hours on Thursday". 'Extremely torrential' In Taiwan, the state weather service predicted "extremely torrential rain" in the country's east. "Its storm radius is quite large, about 320 (kilometres). Although the typhoon's centre is still some distance away, its wide, strong wind field and outer circulation are already affecting parts of Taiwan," it said. James Wu, a local fire department officer, told AFP that evacuations were underway in mountainous areas near Pingtung. "What worries us more is that the damage could be similar to what happened during Typhoon Koinu two years ago," he added, describing a storm that saw utility poles collapse and sheet-metal roofs sent flying into the air. Philippine government weather specialist John Grender Almario said Sunday that "severe flooding and landslides" could be expected in the northern areas of the main island Luzon. The threat of flooding from Ragasa comes just a day after thousands of Filipinos took to the streets to protest a corruption scandal involving flood control projects that were shabbily constructed or never completed. The Philippines is the first major landmass facing the Pacific cyclone belt, and the archipelago is hit by an average of 20 storms and typhoons each year, putting millions of people in disaster-prone areas in a state of constant poverty. Scientists warn that storms are becoming more powerful as the world warms due to the effects of human-driven climate change. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

As Super Typhoon Ragasa made landfall on the Philippines' Calayan Island, China prepares to evacuate 400,000 &nbsp;people.

China prepares to evacuate 400,000 as Super Typhoon Ragasa makes landfall in Philippines

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addresses a gathering in London, UK, says the country wanted to hold talks with neighbouring India on Kashmir, terrorism and trade and also mentioned water. He is of the belief that without a resolution to the Kashmir matter, bilateral ties between the two nations cannot be established. He said, “I have made this offer so many times in the past. We want to discuss Kashmir, water, trade and terrorism issues, not because of any weakness but on the basis of equal terms."&nbsp;The nuclear-armed neighbours were embroiled in cross-border firing, but it was a fight against terrorism. On April 22, the dastardly Pahalgam attack was orchestrated, and it claimed 26 innocent lives.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-pm-shehbaz-sharif-army-chief-asim-munir-to-meet-trump-next-week-here-s-what-we-know-1758017936366">Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif, army chief Asim Munir to meet Trump next week? Here's what we know</a>&nbsp;That’s also when India, intimated Pakistan on the terrorist groups operating on its soil and this particular attack which numbed not only India but world over was carried out by The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Days after the terror attack in Kashmir Valley, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif while speaking to news outlet Sky News said, “Well, we have been doing this dirty work for United States for 3 decades.” This admission came after the reporter asked, “Pakistan has had a long history of backing and supporting and training and funding these terrorist organisations?”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Sky News (<a href="https://twitter.com/SkyYaldaHakim?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SkyYaldaHakim</a>): “But you do admit, you do admit sir, that Pakistan has had a long history of backing and supporting and training and funding these terrorist organizations?” Pakistan Def. Minister: “Well, we have been doing this dirty work for United States for 3… <a href="https://t.co/sv5TRkCgCZ">pic.twitter.com/sv5TRkCgCZ</a>&mdash; Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/DropSiteNews/status/1915547701644763166?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

And now, the Pakistani Air Force struck its own province killing 30 people, including women and children. And there are videos of the bodies of the deceased being carried out of homes in the Matre Dara village located in the Tirah Valley. The disturbing visuals are of people carrying their loved ones. During the wee hours of September 22, the forces dropped eight LS-6 bombs from JF-17 fighter jets. There has been no statement on the killing by the government or the military; the authorities have remained silent.

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addresses a gathering in London, UK, says the country wanted to hold talks with neighbouring India on Kashmir, terrorism, trade and also mentioned water.

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addresses a gathering in London, UK, says the country wanted to hold talks with neighbouring India on Kashmir, terrorism and trade and also mentioned water. He is of the belief that without a resolution to the Kashmir matter, bilateral ties between the two nations cannot be established. He said, “I have made this offer so many times in the past. We want to discuss Kashmir, water, trade and terrorism issues, not because of any weakness but on the basis of equal terms." The nuclear-armed neighbours were embroiled in cross-border firing, but it was a fight against terrorism. On April 22, the dastardly Pahalgam attack was orchestrated, and it claimed 26 innocent lives. Also read: Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif, army chief Asim Munir to meet Trump next week? Here's what we know That’s also when India, intimated Pakistan on the terrorist groups operating on its soil and this particular attack which numbed not only India but world over was carried out by The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Days after the terror attack in Kashmir Valley, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif while speaking to news outlet Sky News said, “Well, we have been doing this dirty work for United States for 3 decades.” This admission came after the reporter asked, “Pakistan has had a long history of backing and supporting and training and funding these terrorist organisations?”

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addresses a gathering in London, UK, says the country wanted to hold talks with neighbouring India on Kashmir, terrorism, trade and also mentioned water.

Silent on Pak military bombing in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, but PM Shehbaz Sharif wants to discuss terrorism with India

The Trump administration has proposed a hike in H-1B visa fees to $100,000 in a sudden, arbitrary and confusing move that primarily targets Indian high-tech professionals. This constitutes a non-tariff barrier to market access and reflects a form of US trade protectionism. Both the US and India are signatories to the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), a key framework under the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Mode 4 of GATS deals with the ‘movement of natural persons’. India has been a long-standing advocate of Mode 4, which is crucial to its strength in global trade in services. No country has ever legally challenged another under the WTO specifically over Mode 4. If India were to do so against the US, it would be a world first. But will it? What is the legal argument? What are the pros and cons of a potential India–US dispute at the WTO over arbitrary visa regulations? Let's break it down.<h2>Why Mode 4 of WTO on movement of natural persons is important for India</h2>India is one of the largest exporters of services globally, for which it heavily relies on the temporary movement of natural persons. Mode 4 under the WTO’s GATS ensures this cross-border trade in services, especially in IT, consulting, and professional sectors. The US is a key destination for such movement of people, offering visa categories such as H-1B and L-1, which broadly correspond to its Mode 4 commitments under GATS.An arbitrary and disproportionate increase in visa fees, such as the proposed hike to $100,000 for H-1B visas, would in effect restrict access of the Indian IT industry to the US market, severely impacting Indian service providers and other foreign service suppliers.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/do-you-have-h-1b-visa-us-official-says-indians-don-t-need-to-rush-here-s-why-1758387383378">Do you have H-1B visa? US official says Indians DON’T NEED to rush. Here’s why</a><h2>Legal basis under WTO/GATS on the movement of persons as part of trade</h2>Under Article XVI, which deals with market access, and Article XVII, which deals with national treatment, GATS prevents WTO members from imposing measures that nullify or impair the commitments made on trade in services, including those related to Mode 4. The US is committed to allowing temporary entry for specific categories of natural persons. However, the arbitrary rise in visa fees and harsh immigration regulations targeting specific countries would make entry into the US prohibitively expensive or impossible for Indian professionals and other service suppliers. This can be construed as quantitative restrictions or non-tariff barriers that violate WTO provisions.Visa fees are not explicitly regulated by GATS, but they are an essential part of immigration and market access conditions. Excessive or arbitrary fee hikes constitute non-tariff barriers by effectively restricting the entry of service providers, undermining the principles of reasonable, transparent, and non-discriminatory access enshrined in WTO commitments.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-floats-k-visa-amid-trump-s-h1-b-chaos-1758559833186/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-floats-k-visa-amid-trump-s-h1-b-chaos-1758559833186/embed</a><h2>US visa fee hikes as de facto quantitative restrictions on trade</h2>A visa fee hike of an extreme magnitude like the $100,000 for H-1B visas can arguably act as a de facto quantitative limitation, as it deters applicants, effectively capping the number of natural persons who can access the American market. This, in spirit, violates GATS’ emphasis on progressive trade liberalisation. This, along with other immigration restriction measures, can be viewed as actions nullifying or impairing expected benefits under Article XXIII (non-violation complaints) of GATS.Visa fees inherently discriminate against foreign nationals, potentially breaching national treatment principles, particularly if fees are arbitrary or disproportionately high compared to the cost of processing visas for domestic or other categories of workers.<h2>But what are the challenges in pursuing a legal case on visa restrictions and high fees?</h2>Mode 4 annexes and provisions explicitly permit WTO members to regulate the entry and stay of natural persons for public order, security, or administrative reasons. The US is likely to invoke these exceptions under Article XIV, arguing immigration sovereignty and administrative cost recovery. However, in the case of H-1B visa fees, the American rationale is to bring jobs back to US citizens, not because visa holders are a threat to public order or security. In simple terms, it is a matter of economic protectionism.The US’s Mode 4 commitments are limited and selective, covering specific categories such as intra-company transferees and certain professionals. Many sectors remain “unbound.” Therefore, it is quite possible for the US to argue that the visa fee changes fall outside its commitments and may be beyond WTO scrutiny.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-doctors-not-pay-100-000-fee-on-h-1b-visas-report-claims-case-by-case-exemptions-1758561658463">Will doctors not pay $100,000 fee on H-1B visas? Report claims ‘case-by-case exemptions’</a><h2>How it could set a precedent if India sues the US at the WTO under Mode 4</h2>That said, a WTO dispute initiated by India against the US over visa fee hikes could set a precedent. If India proceeds, it would be the first-ever case focusing explicitly on visa fees under Mode 4. It could compel the WTO to clarify its role in regulating the balance between immigration control and trade commitments on services, and address artificial barriers to trade.Such a case, if it materialises, would affirm that negative-effect immigration rules constitute non-tariff barriers. It would prompt a determination as to whether such measures are subject to WTO disciplines, particularly when they impair trade commitments—especially for developing countries like India that are dependent on Mode 4 exports.<h2>Practical considerations of a case against the US by India over immigration restrictions</h2>While the argument that visa fee hikes constitute trade barriers violating GATS commitments is legally sound, it would face significant hurdles. For example, proving that visa fees exceed legitimate immigration control and amount to disguised protectionism would be challenging.WTO members generally enjoy broad flexibilities and exceptions regarding immigration, as it is a politically sensitive subject involving national sovereignty and domestic rule-making. Navigating this political sensitivity in an untested legal space would be a challenge for India.As noted, the US has only limited Mode 4 commitments. The key question is whether a WTO dispute panel would defer to sovereign immigration policy, or adopt an objective view based on how such measures affect agreed trade principles under Mode 4.Also read: <a href="UK to scrap visa fee after Trump’s $100,000 hike for H-1B? Report claims Starmer considering reform">UK to scrap visa fee after Trump’s $100,000 hike for H-1B? Report claims Starmer considering reform</a><h2>India has a strong legal foundation for pursuing a case at the WTO over visa fee hikes, despite the challenges involved</h2>It is legally sound for India to argue that sudden visa fee hikes and immigration reforms affecting Indian professionals amount to restricting market access and discriminating against foreign service providers. A WTO panel ruling in India’s favour would set a landmark precedent, making clear that WTO members cannot use protectionist immigration policies or excessive visa fees to bypass their trade commitments. It could strengthen the enforceability of Mode 4 and advance fairer global trade in services.If pursued, this case would not only address a critical trade barrier impacting India’s service exports, but also clarify the relationship between immigration regulations and international trade law under the WTO framework.&nbsp;But will India bite the bullet on this? That’s a 100,000 dollar question. &nbsp;

In theory at least, it is possible for India to approach the WTO over the arbitrary $100,000 H-1B visa fee hike by the US. Such a case has never happened, but would fall under GATS Mode 4 that deals with transnational movement of people. But will India make such a move?



The Trump administration has proposed a hike in H-1B visa fees to $100,000 in a sudden, arbitrary and confusing move that primarily targets Indian high-tech professionals. This constitutes a non-tariff barrier to market access and reflects a form of US trade protectionism. Both the US and India are signatories to the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), a key framework under the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Mode 4 of GATS deals with the ‘movement of natural persons’. India has been a long-standing advocate of Mode 4, which is crucial to its strength in global trade in services. No country has ever legally challenged another under the WTO specifically over Mode 4. If India were to do so against the US, it would be a world first. But will it? What is the legal argument? What are the pros and cons of a potential India–US dispute at the WTO over arbitrary visa regulations? Let's break it down. Why Mode 4 of WTO on movement of natural persons is important for India India is one of the largest exporters of services globally, for which it heavily relies on the temporary movement of natural persons. Mode 4 under the WTO’s GATS ensures this cross-border trade in services, especially in IT, consulting, and professional sectors. The US is a key destination for such movement of people, offering visa categories such as H-1B and L-1, which broadly correspond to its Mode 4 commitments under GATS. An arbitrary and disproportionate increase in visa fees, such as the proposed hike to $100,000 for H-1B visas, would in effect restrict access of the Indian IT industry to the US market, severely impacting Indian service providers and other foreign service suppliers. Also read: Do you have H-1B visa? US official says Indians DON’T NEED to rush. Here’s why Legal basis under WTO/GATS on the movement of persons as part of trade Under Article XVI, which deals with market access, and Article XVII, which deals with national treatment, GATS prevents WTO members from imposing measures that nullify or impair the commitments made on trade in services, including those related to Mode 4. The US is committed to allowing temporary entry for specific categories of natural persons. However, the arbitrary rise in visa fees and harsh immigration regulations targeting specific countries would make entry into the US prohibitively expensive or impossible for Indian professionals and other service suppliers. This can be construed as quantitative restrictions or non-tariff barriers that violate WTO provisions. Visa fees are not explicitly regulated by GATS, but they are an essential part of immigration and market access conditions. Excessive or arbitrary fee hikes constitute non-tariff barriers by effectively restricting the entry of service providers, undermining the principles of reasonable, transparent, and non-discriminatory access enshrined in WTO commitments. https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-floats-k-visa-amid-trump-s-h1-b-chaos-1758559833186/embed US visa fee hikes as de facto quantitative restrictions on trade A visa fee hike of an extreme magnitude like the $100,000 for H-1B visas can arguably act as a de facto quantitative limitation, as it deters applicants, effectively capping the number of natural persons who can access the American market. This, in spirit, violates GATS’ emphasis on progressive trade liberalisation. This, along with other immigration restriction measures, can be viewed as actions nullifying or impairing expected benefits under Article XXIII (non-violation complaints) of GATS. Visa fees inherently discriminate against foreign nationals, potentially breaching national treatment principles, particularly if fees are arbitrary or disproportionately high compared to the cost of processing visas for domestic or other categories of workers. But what are the challenges in pursuing a legal case on visa restrictions and high fees? Mode 4 annexes and provisions explicitly permit WTO members to regulate the entry and stay of natural persons for public order, security, or administrative reasons. The US is likely to invoke these exceptions under Article XIV, arguing immigration sovereignty and administrative cost recovery. However, in the case of H-1B visa fees, the American rationale is to bring jobs back to US citizens, not because visa holders are a threat to public order or security. In simple terms, it is a matter of economic protectionism. The US’s Mode 4 commitments are limited and selective, covering specific categories such as intra-company transferees and certain professionals. Many sectors remain “unbound.” Therefore, it is quite possible for the US to argue that the visa fee changes fall outside its commitments and may be beyond WTO scrutiny. Also read: Will doctors not pay $100,000 fee on H-1B visas? Report claims ‘case-by-case exemptions’ How it could set a precedent if India sues the US at the WTO under Mode 4 That said, a WTO dispute initiated by India against the US over visa fee hikes could set a precedent. If India proceeds, it would be the first-ever case focusing explicitly on visa fees under Mode 4. It could compel the WTO to clarify its role in regulating the balance between immigration control and trade commitments on services, and address artificial barriers to trade. Such a case, if it materialises, would affirm that negative-effect immigration rules constitute non-tariff barriers. It would prompt a determination as to whether such measures are subject to WTO disciplines, particularly when they impair trade commitments—especially for developing countries like India that are dependent on Mode 4 exports. Practical considerations of a case against the US by India over immigration restrictions While the argument that visa fee hikes constitute trade barriers violating GATS commitments is legally sound, it would face significant hurdles. For example, proving that visa fees exceed legitimate immigration control and amount to disguised protectionism would be challenging. WTO members generally enjoy broad flexibilities and exceptions regarding immigration, as it is a politically sensitive subject involving national sovereignty and domestic rule-making. Navigating this political sensitivity in an untested legal space would be a challenge for India. As noted, the US has only limited Mode 4 commitments. The key question is whether a WTO dispute panel would defer to sovereign immigration policy, or adopt an objective view based on how such measures affect agreed trade principles under Mode 4. Also read: UK to scrap visa fee after Trump’s $100,000 hike for H-1B? Report claims Starmer considering reform India has a strong legal foundation for pursuing a case at the WTO over visa fee hikes, despite the challenges involved It is legally sound for India to argue that sudden visa fee hikes and immigration reforms affecting Indian professionals amount to restricting market access and discriminating against foreign service providers. A WTO panel ruling in India’s favour would set a landmark precedent, making clear that WTO members cannot use protectionist immigration policies or excessive visa fees to bypass their trade commitments. It could strengthen the enforceability of Mode 4 and advance fairer global trade in services. If pursued, this case would not only address a critical trade barrier impacting India’s service exports, but also clarify the relationship between immigration regulations and international trade law under the WTO framework. But will India bite the bullet on this? That’s a 100,000 dollar question.

In theory at least, it is possible for India to approach the WTO over the arbitrary $100,000 H-1B visa fee hike by the US. Such a case has never happened, but would fall under GATS Mode 4 that deals with transnational movement of people. But will India make such a move?&nbsp;

H1-B visa fee hike is a trade barrier: Legal argument for India to sue the US at the WTO in a world-first under Mode 4 of GATS

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Sep 22) pushed anti-vaccination sentiments as he urged pregnant women to avoid using Tylenol during pregnancy over purported autism risks. At a White House press conference, Trump tied the painkiller, which is known as paracetamol outside America, to autism — a link not backed by medical consensus — while calling for major changes to the way babies are vaccinated.<h2>Trump's anti-vax rant</h2>Leaning heavily into anti-vaccine talking points, Trump repeated claims long promoted by his health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He argued that newborns should not receive the Hepatitis B vaccine — despite decades of research showing it prevents maternal transmission of the virus — and suggested childhood vaccines were overloaded with “too much liquid.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-tells-pregnant-women-to-tough-it-out-without-paracetamol-claims-amish-have-no-autism-because-they-lack-tylenol-1758589438052">Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out’ without paracetamol, claims Amish have ‘no autism’ because they lack Tylenol</a>Trump, who does not have any medical degrees, said that children should not get vaccinated against Hepatitis B until the age of 12 years. He said that "Hepatitis B is sexually transmitted," and stated that thus "There's no reason to give a baby that's almost just born hepatitis B." While it is true that Hep-B is mostly spread via sexual contact, it can be passed from a mother to her child during pregnancy. &nbsp;“They pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies, it's a disgrace,” Trump said. “It looks like they’re pumping into a horse,” he claimed, but once again said, "I'm not a doctor, but I'm giving my opinion."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/paracetamol-causes-autism-trump-admin-to-reveal-alarming-side-effects-of-tylenol-use-by-pregnant-women-1758529171001">Paracetamol causes autism? Trump admin to reveal alarming side effects of Tylenol use by pregnant women</a><h2>Echoes of "injecting bleach": Trump's latest remarks spark déjà vu</h2>The comments echoed Trump’s pandemic-era riffs about disinfectant injections and “light inside the body,” when he was widely mocked for dispensing medical theories from the podium.For doctors, the concern is more immediate. “Spacing out or delaying vaccines means children will not have immunity against these diseases at times when they are most at risk,” said Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Paediatrics. “Any effort to misrepresent sound science poses a threat to the health of children.”

US President Donald Trump, in a press conference, promoted anti-vaccination theories, suggesting that children's vaccination schedules should be changed, claiming that

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Sep 22) pushed anti-vaccination sentiments as he urged pregnant women to avoid using Tylenol during pregnancy over purported autism risks. At a White House press conference, Trump tied the painkiller, which is known as paracetamol outside America, to autism — a link not backed by medical consensus — while calling for major changes to the way babies are vaccinated. Trump's anti-vax rant Leaning heavily into anti-vaccine talking points, Trump repeated claims long promoted by his health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He argued that newborns should not receive the Hepatitis B vaccine — despite decades of research showing it prevents maternal transmission of the virus — and suggested childhood vaccines were overloaded with “too much liquid.” Also read | Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out’ without paracetamol, claims Amish have ‘no autism’ because they lack Tylenol Trump, who does not have any medical degrees, said that children should not get vaccinated against Hepatitis B until the age of 12 years. He said that "Hepatitis B is sexually transmitted," and stated that thus "There's no reason to give a baby that's almost just born hepatitis B." While it is true that Hep-B is mostly spread via sexual contact, it can be passed from a mother to her child during pregnancy. “They pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies, it's a disgrace,” Trump said. “It looks like they’re pumping into a horse,” he claimed, but once again said, "I'm not a doctor, but I'm giving my opinion." Also read | Paracetamol causes autism? Trump admin to reveal alarming side effects of Tylenol use by pregnant women Echoes of "injecting bleach": Trump's latest remarks spark déjà vu The comments echoed Trump’s pandemic-era riffs about disinfectant injections and “light inside the body,” when he was widely mocked for dispensing medical theories from the podium. For doctors, the concern is more immediate. “Spacing out or delaying vaccines means children will not have immunity against these diseases at times when they are most at risk,” said Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Paediatrics. “Any effort to misrepresent sound science poses a threat to the health of children.”

US President Donald Trump, in a press conference, promoted anti-vaccination theories, suggesting that children's vaccination schedules should be changed, claiming that&nbsp;

‘They pump babies like horses’: Trump slams vaccines, urges parents to delay Hep-B shot until child turns 12

US President Donald Trump is on the quest to 'Make America Great Again' and his Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to 'Make America Healthy Again.' The two addressed a press conference on Monday (Sep 22) and asked the pregnant women to avoid taking a drug called tylenol. Trump and Kennedy Jr. claimed that the drug is the cause of autism. There is, however, no concrete evidence to support the statement from the president. Trump not only wants mothers of newborn babies to avoid giving Tylenol to infants but also expects women to 'tough it out' without it during pregnancy.&nbsp;<h2>What is tylenol and why is Trump asking pregnant women to not take it?</h2>&nbsp;Tylenol is a painkiller which is widely used over-the-counter medicine used to temporarily relieve pain and reduce fever among patients. Trump also said during the press conference that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the country has also issued a letter to the physicians across the nation to alert them and minimize considering the usage of acetaminophen - the active ingredient in Tylenol - especially in pregnant women.&nbsp;The medicine is commonly used for headaches, muscle aches, arthritis, and menstrual cramps as well as to counter fever associated with colds or flu, says Drugs.com description of the medicine. It is available in various forms such as tablets, capsules, liquids, and powders as well. According to FDA, the dosage should not exceed 4000mg in 24 hours in an adult or children 12 years and older.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-to-slam-globalist-institutions-decaying-world-order-in-un-speech-white-house-1758563791794">Trump to slam globalist institutions, decaying world order in UN speech: White House</a><h2>&nbsp;</h2><h2>What is FDA doing about it?</h2>&nbsp;The FDA has issued a press release after Trump's statement and said that it has "initiated the process for a label change for acetaminophen (tylenol and similar products) to reflect evidence suggesting that the use of acetaminophen by pregnant women may be associated with an increased risk of neurological conditions such as autism and ADHD in children.&nbsp;The department, however, maintained that the final "choice belongs to the parents" regarding the usage of the drug. It also added in the release that the usage of acetaminophen remains "reasonable for pregnant women in certain scenarios. The FDA also acknowledged that there are multiple contrary studies available to suggest a casual relationship between the drug and its potential cause in increasing the risk of autism.

Trump and Kennedy Jr. claimed Tylenol is the cause of autism. Here's what FDA had to say

US President Donald Trump is on the quest to 'Make America Great Again' and his Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to 'Make America Healthy Again.' The two addressed a press conference on Monday (Sep 22) and asked the pregnant women to avoid taking a drug called tylenol. Trump and Kennedy Jr. claimed that the drug is the cause of autism. There is, however, no concrete evidence to support the statement from the president. Trump not only wants mothers of newborn babies to avoid giving Tylenol to infants but also expects women to 'tough it out' without it during pregnancy. What is tylenol and why is Trump asking pregnant women to not take it? Tylenol is a painkiller which is widely used over-the-counter medicine used to temporarily relieve pain and reduce fever among patients. Trump also said during the press conference that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the country has also issued a letter to the physicians across the nation to alert them and minimize considering the usage of acetaminophen - the active ingredient in Tylenol - especially in pregnant women. The medicine is commonly used for headaches, muscle aches, arthritis, and menstrual cramps as well as to counter fever associated with colds or flu, says Drugs.com description of the medicine. It is available in various forms such as tablets, capsules, liquids, and powders as well. According to FDA, the dosage should not exceed 4000mg in 24 hours in an adult or children 12 years and older. Also read: Trump to slam globalist institutions, decaying world order in UN speech: White House What is FDA doing about it? The FDA has issued a press release after Trump's statement and said that it has "initiated the process for a label change for acetaminophen (tylenol and similar products) to reflect evidence suggesting that the use of acetaminophen by pregnant women may be associated with an increased risk of neurological conditions such as autism and ADHD in children. The department, however, maintained that the final "choice belongs to the parents" regarding the usage of the drug. It also added in the release that the usage of acetaminophen remains "reasonable for pregnant women in certain scenarios. The FDA also acknowledged that there are multiple contrary studies available to suggest a casual relationship between the drug and its potential cause in increasing the risk of autism.

Trump and Kennedy Jr. claimed tylenol is the cause of autism. Here's what FDA had to say

What is tylenol? FDA issues letter to physicians alerting about drug after Trump's warning against its usage

A group of US lawmakers is in Beijing this week to discuss a potential agreement that could see China purchasing hundreds of Boeing jets, as per Representative Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington. At a press conference on Tuesday (September 23), Smith highlighted the significance of the deal, noting its importance to the US president.&nbsp;The deal in question involves Boeing selling up to 500 jets to China, a potential breakthrough for the company, which has faced challenges in securing orders from China due to the strained US-China trade relations. A report from Bloomberg last month revealed Boeing’s efforts to revive sales in China’s massive aviation market, which has largely been stagnant for several years. Smith, who is leading the bipartisan delegation, remarked on the long gap since Boeing aircraft have been sold in China, expressing optimism about the company’s prospects. "We want to see that deal through and support a good product," he was quoted as saying.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-is-inderjit-singh-gosal-key-khalistani-figure-arrested-in-canada-after-violent-attack-at-hindu-temple-1758529624676">Who is Inderjit Singh Gosal? Key Khalistani figure, arrested in Canada after violent attack at Hindu temple</a>&nbsp;David Purdue, the US Ambassador to China, suggested that the negotiations were nearing their final stages and described the deal as a key priority. Purdue also mentioned his recent visit to Boeing’s assembly plant in Tianjin, a city near Beijing, as part of ongoing efforts to strengthen trade ties. The visit by the US delegation is the first of its kind since 2019, following a period of escalating tensions between the two countries, which were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The discussions also align with recent conversations between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, as both countries seek to improve relations beyond the current trade truce.&nbsp;In addition to trade, the delegation has also focused on defense and security issues. During their meetings, lawmakers raised concerns about nuclear weapons and the need for enhanced military dialogue between the two countries. Smith emphasised the importance of managing these issues to avoid inadvertent conflict, given the growing arsenals on both sides. Smith, who chairs the House Armed Services Committee, has long been involved in defense policy and sees the dialogue with China as a crucial element of US national security strategy.&nbsp;&nbsp;Other members of the delegation, including Representative Ro Khanna from Silicon Valley, are particularly focused on the competitive landscape between the US and China in technology and economic spheres, with issues like semiconductor chips, the South China Sea, and the role of companies like TikTok also complicating relations. While the Boeing deal is a central topic, the broader agenda includes improving diplomatic channels and fostering greater understanding between the two global superpowers.

In Beijing, US lawmakers push for Boeing’s return to China market amid high-stakes talks

A group of US lawmakers is in Beijing this week to discuss a potential agreement that could see China purchasing hundreds of Boeing jets, as per Representative Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington. At a press conference on Tuesday (September 23), Smith highlighted the significance of the deal, noting its importance to the US president. The deal in question involves Boeing selling up to 500 jets to China, a potential breakthrough for the company, which has faced challenges in securing orders from China due to the strained US-China trade relations. A report from Bloomberg last month revealed Boeing’s efforts to revive sales in China’s massive aviation market, which has largely been stagnant for several years. Smith, who is leading the bipartisan delegation, remarked on the long gap since Boeing aircraft have been sold in China, expressing optimism about the company’s prospects. "We want to see that deal through and support a good product," he was quoted as saying. Also Read: Who is Inderjit Singh Gosal? Key Khalistani figure, arrested in Canada after violent attack at Hindu temple David Purdue, the US Ambassador to China, suggested that the negotiations were nearing their final stages and described the deal as a key priority. Purdue also mentioned his recent visit to Boeing’s assembly plant in Tianjin, a city near Beijing, as part of ongoing efforts to strengthen trade ties. The visit by the US delegation is the first of its kind since 2019, following a period of escalating tensions between the two countries, which were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The discussions also align with recent conversations between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, as both countries seek to improve relations beyond the current trade truce. In addition to trade, the delegation has also focused on defense and security issues. During their meetings, lawmakers raised concerns about nuclear weapons and the need for enhanced military dialogue between the two countries. Smith emphasised the importance of managing these issues to avoid inadvertent conflict, given the growing arsenals on both sides. Smith, who chairs the House Armed Services Committee, has long been involved in defense policy and sees the dialogue with China as a crucial element of US national security strategy. Other members of the delegation, including Representative Ro Khanna from Silicon Valley, are particularly focused on the competitive landscape between the US and China in technology and economic spheres, with issues like semiconductor chips, the South China Sea, and the role of companies like TikTok also complicating relations. While the Boeing deal is a central topic, the broader agenda includes improving diplomatic channels and fostering greater understanding between the two global superpowers.

A bipartisan US delegation to Beijing is advocating for China to purchase up to 500 Boeing jets. The discussions are part of broader efforts to improve US-China relations, particularly in trade and defense

Boeing has begun production of the F-47, the United States Air Force’s new sixth-generation stealth fighter. The jet is part of the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) programme, which also includes advanced drones, weapons, sensors, and electronic warfare systems. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin confirmed the update at the Air &amp; Space Forces Association’s 2025 conference, saying the first flight is planned for 2028.<h2>Why does it matter?</h2>President Donald Trump announced in March that Boeing had won the competition to build the crewed fighter element of NGAD. Officials say the F-47 will ensure American air superiority well into the future. “All of the rest of the [NGAD] systems, along with the F-47, are going to ensure dominance. We’ve got to go fast … the team is committed to get the first one flying in 2028,” Gen. Allvin said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-could-neither-confirm-nor-deny-drone-scare-shuts-copenhagen-and-oslo-airports-was-russia-behind-it-1758599063198">'Could neither confirm nor deny': Drone scare shuts Copenhagen and Oslo airports - Was Russia behind it?</a><h2>How secret is the design?</h2>So far, only two official renderings of the F-47 exist, and the Air Force has warned they may not fully reflect the real jet. Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink joked that Chinese intelligence analysts are likely studying the images closely but will “find nothing useful”. The jet is expected to feature all-aspect stealth, reduced infrared signature, and next-generation networking to control future drones.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Meet the <a href="https://twitter.com/usairforce?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@USAirForce</a>&#39;s sixth-generation fighter, the F-47, bringing next-gen technologies to ensure air dominance for decades to come.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AFANational?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AFANational</a> <a href="https://t.co/eUEfW2JzD8">pic.twitter.com/eUEfW2JzD8</a>&mdash; Boeing Defense (@BoeingDefense) <a href="https://twitter.com/BoeingDefense/status/1970128682984583293?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What will the F-47 be able to do?</h2>According to the Air Force, the fighter will have:• A combat radius over 1,000 nautical miles, about 25% more than current jets.• Speeds above Mach 2.• Potential supercruise capability, though details remain classified.The F-47 will also plug into the wider NGAD system, with advanced sensors and data links to manage unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft.<h2>How many will be built, and at what cost?</h2>The Air Force plans to buy at least 185 jets, replacing the F-22 Raptor. However, numbers could change, and there may be multiple versions over time. Cost is a major question. Estimates suggest each F-47 could be three times the price of an F-35, more than $300 million per aircraft.Officials say the pace is being driven by competition with China. “The adversary is not taking a knee. We can’t get enamoured with platforms, it’s the systems that link them together that makes it work,” Gen. Allvin warned.

Boeing has begun producing the F-47, America’s sixth-generation stealth fighter under the NGAD programme. First flight is slated for 2028, with at least 185 jets planned to replace the F-22.

Boeing has begun production of the F-47, the United States Air Force’s new sixth-generation stealth fighter. The jet is part of the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) programme, which also includes advanced drones, weapons, sensors, and electronic warfare systems. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin confirmed the update at the Air & Space Forces Association’s 2025 conference, saying the first flight is planned for 2028. Why does it matter? President Donald Trump announced in March that Boeing had won the competition to build the crewed fighter element of NGAD. Officials say the F-47 will ensure American air superiority well into the future. “All of the rest of the [NGAD] systems, along with the F-47, are going to ensure dominance. We’ve got to go fast … the team is committed to get the first one flying in 2028,” Gen. Allvin said. Also read: 'Could neither confirm nor deny': Drone scare shuts Copenhagen and Oslo airports - Was Russia behind it? How secret is the design? So far, only two official renderings of the F-47 exist, and the Air Force has warned they may not fully reflect the real jet. Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink joked that Chinese intelligence analysts are likely studying the images closely but will “find nothing useful”. The jet is expected to feature all-aspect stealth, reduced infrared signature, and next-generation networking to control future drones.

Boeing has begun producing the F-47, America’s sixth-generation stealth fighter under the NGAD programme. First flight is slated for 2028, with at least 185 jets planned to replace the F-22.

$300m a plane: What makes the F-47 the costliest fighter jet yet? How fast will it be, and when will it fly?

Inderjit Singh Gosal, a prominent member of the Khalistani movement and a key organiser for the US-based Sikh separatist group Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), was arrested by Canadian authorities. Gosal, 36, assumed a central role in SFJ's Canadian operations after the death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in June 2023. Nijjar, who had been gunned down in British Columbia, had previously served as the primary organiser for SFJ in Canada.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/paracetamol-causes-autism-trump-admin-to-reveal-alarming-side-effects-of-tylenol-use-by-pregnant-women-1758529171001">Paracetamol causes autism? Trump admin to reveal alarming side effects of Tylenol use by pregnant women</a>&nbsp;In November 2023, Canadian police detained Gosal in connection with a violent altercation at a Hindu temple in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), where he allegedly attacked Hindu-Canadian worshippers. However, he was later granted conditional release by Peel Regional Police (PRP). At that time, it was noted that Gosal was one of the main figures behind the controversial Khalistan referendum in Canada.<h2>Who is Inderjit Singh Gosal?</h2>Regarded as a close associate of Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, the general counsel of SFJ, Gosal is seen as a key lieutenant in the group's operations. Pannun, who is designated a terrorist by India, continues to lead the group's push for an independent Sikh homeland.&nbsp;Gosal was also among the 13 Canadian citizens warned by police as potential targets of criminal violence linked to pro-Khalistan activities. Following the attack on the Hindu temple in Brampton, which was hosting a consular event at the time, SFJ claimed that Gosal had been a victim of this violence. Indian officials, including representatives from the Toronto Consulate, were reportedly present during the protest.&nbsp;In a recent statement, Gosal expressed his unwavering commitment to the Khalistan cause, saying that he would not fear death if it meant achieving an independent Sikh state. “I know what I signed up for,” Gosal was quoted as saying to The Financial Times. "Death doesn't scare me."&nbsp;The Khalistan movement, which has its roots in the independence struggle, gained renewed momentum after the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, which many Sikhs term a ‘genocide’. The resulting violence forced thousands to flee India, with many seeking refuge in Canada. The attack at the Hindu temple in Brampton further aggravated diplomatic tensions between India and Canada. Canadian political leaders, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, condemned the attack.&nbsp;

Who is Inderjit Singh Gosal? Key Khalistani figure, arrested in Canada after violent attack at Hindu temple

Inderjit Singh Gosal, a prominent member of the Khalistani movement and a key organiser for the US-based Sikh separatist group Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), was arrested by Canadian authorities. Gosal, 36, assumed a central role in SFJ's Canadian operations after the death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in June 2023. Nijjar, who had been gunned down in British Columbia, had previously served as the primary organiser for SFJ in Canada. Also Read: Paracetamol causes autism? Trump admin to reveal alarming side effects of Tylenol use by pregnant women In November 2023, Canadian police detained Gosal in connection with a violent altercation at a Hindu temple in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), where he allegedly attacked Hindu-Canadian worshippers. However, he was later granted conditional release by Peel Regional Police (PRP). At that time, it was noted that Gosal was one of the main figures behind the controversial Khalistan referendum in Canada. Who is Inderjit Singh Gosal? Regarded as a close associate of Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, the general counsel of SFJ, Gosal is seen as a key lieutenant in the group's operations. Pannun, who is designated a terrorist by India, continues to lead the group's push for an independent Sikh homeland. Gosal was also among the 13 Canadian citizens warned by police as potential targets of criminal violence linked to pro-Khalistan activities. Following the attack on the Hindu temple in Brampton, which was hosting a consular event at the time, SFJ claimed that Gosal had been a victim of this violence. Indian officials, including representatives from the Toronto Consulate, were reportedly present during the protest. In a recent statement, Gosal expressed his unwavering commitment to the Khalistan cause, saying that he would not fear death if it meant achieving an independent Sikh state. “I know what I signed up for,” Gosal was quoted as saying to The Financial Times. "Death doesn't scare me." The Khalistan movement, which has its roots in the independence struggle, gained renewed momentum after the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, which many Sikhs term a ‘genocide’. The resulting violence forced thousands to flee India, with many seeking refuge in Canada. The attack at the Hindu temple in Brampton further aggravated diplomatic tensions between India and Canada. Canadian political leaders, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, condemned the attack.

Inderjit Singh Gosal, a key Khalistani figure and organiser for Sikhs for Justice in Canada, was arrested after a violent incident at a Hindu temple in Brampton

Former Vice President Kamala Harris was directly asked by the MSNBC reporter, Rachel Maddow, about her opinion on the socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani. Harris responded affirmatively but, according to many observers, was cautious about her support. She voiced her support for Mamdani but quickly followed up, saying that he is not the only ‘star’ in the Democratic Party. Former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris was discussing her new book '107 Days'. This was her first major television interview since losing the 2024 Presidential election.&nbsp;"Look, as far as I’m concerned, he’s the Democratic nominee, and he should be supported," said Harris. When asked specifically if she 'endorses his candidacy'? "I support the Democrat in the race, sure," Harris said.However, she was quick to add, "He is not the only star… I hope we don’t overindex on New York City, that we lose sight of our stars throughout our country." She said that there is Barbara Drummond in Mobile, Alabama, and Helena Moreno in New Orleans; all of them are stars. They should not be overlooked because New Yorkers think they are at the centre of the universe.&nbsp;Mamdani has a huge grassroots support among New Yorkers. According to a report by Newsweek, Mamdani's chances have surged 85 per cent on the prediction market as of last week. Despite calls by the US President Donald Trump to consolidate against Mamdani, he holds a significant lead over his opponents ahead of the November 4 polling.&nbsp;"Governor Kathy Hochul of New York has endorsed the 'Liddle' Communist,' Zohran Mamdani, running for Mayor of New York. This is a rather shocking development, and a very bad one for New York City." Trump said in a post on Truth Social.&nbsp;Five major polls: CBS News/YouGov, Marist survey, Quinnipiac University's poll, The New York Times/Siena poll mark Mamdani as the favourite in the mayoral race of the largest city, New York. Mamdani rose to fame nationwide when he defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic Primary.Mamdani has already received endorsement from Senator Bernie Sanders, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul. But he has faced silence from national democratic leaders of New ork such as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.&nbsp;"The oligarchs are panicking. They will spend as much as it takes to try to defeat Zohran Mamdani. They've got the money. We've got the people," said Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. &nbsp;&nbsp;

Kamala Harris cautiously backs Zohran Mamdani for NYC Mayor, calling him a Democrat “star” but stressing others shouldn’t be overlooked.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris was directly asked by the MSNBC reporter, Rachel Maddow, about her opinion on the socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani. Harris responded affirmatively but, according to many observers, was cautious about her support. She voiced her support for Mamdani but quickly followed up, saying that he is not the only ‘star’ in the Democratic Party. Former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris was discussing her new book '107 Days'. This was her first major television interview since losing the 2024 Presidential election. "Look, as far as I’m concerned, he’s the Democratic nominee, and he should be supported," said Harris. When asked specifically if she 'endorses his candidacy'? "I support the Democrat in the race, sure," Harris said. However, she was quick to add, "He is not the only star… I hope we don’t overindex on New York City, that we lose sight of our stars throughout our country." She said that there is Barbara Drummond in Mobile, Alabama, and Helena Moreno in New Orleans; all of them are stars. They should not be overlooked because New Yorkers think they are at the centre of the universe. Mamdani has a huge grassroots support among New Yorkers. According to a report by Newsweek, Mamdani's chances have surged 85 per cent on the prediction market as of last week. Despite calls by the US President Donald Trump to consolidate against Mamdani, he holds a significant lead over his opponents ahead of the November 4 polling. "Governor Kathy Hochul of New York has endorsed the 'Liddle' Communist,' Zohran Mamdani, running for Mayor of New York. This is a rather shocking development, and a very bad one for New York City." Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Five major polls: CBS News/YouGov, Marist survey, Quinnipiac University's poll, The New York Times/Siena poll mark Mamdani as the favourite in the mayoral race of the largest city, New York. Mamdani rose to fame nationwide when he defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic Primary. Mamdani has already received endorsement from Senator Bernie Sanders, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul. But he has faced silence from national democratic leaders of New ork such as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. "The oligarchs are panicking. They will spend as much as it takes to try to defeat Zohran Mamdani. They've got the money. We've got the people," said Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Kamala Harris cautiously backs Zohran Mamdani for NYC Mayor, calling him a Democrat “star” but stressing others shouldn’t be overlooked.

Kamala Harris offers backing for Zohran Mamdani, stops short of full-throated NYC Mayor endorsement

A series of technical breakdowns at the United Nations left world leaders struggling to be heard as they addressed the General Assembly on Gaza and Palestinian statehood. Microphone failures interrupted speeches by Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, and Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto. UN staff later said the glitches were due to equipment faults in the General Assembly hall, stressing there was “no indication” of deliberate interference.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mass-funeral-in-pakistan-after-military-bombs-khyber-pakhtunkhwa-village-killing-30-1758606948105">Mass funeral in Pakistan after military bombs Khyber Pakhtunkhwa village killing 30</a><h2>What happened to Indonesia’s president mid-speech?</h2>On Tuesday, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto was outlining plans to send peacekeepers to Gaza when his microphone suddenly went silent. The interpreter was left unable to continue until the feed returned seconds later.<h2>Erdogan’s warning on Gaza cut short</h2>Hours earlier, Turkish President Erdogan was denouncing what he called Israel’s “genocide in Gaza” and urging immediate recognition of Palestine when his audio failed. Delegates briefly heard the interpreter say, “Cannot hear the President, his voice is gone.” The sound came back soon after, but not before confusion spread through the hall.<h2>Canada’s Palestine recognition met with cheers, then silence</h2>The most dramatic disruption came when Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney formally recognised the State of Palestine. His declaration, “In this context, Canada recognises the state of Palestine,” drew applause from delegates. Moments later, his microphone cut out completely, raising questions about the timing of the glitch. One delegate later remarked, “The recognition was heard loud and clear, even if the microphone was not.”<h2>Why is Palestinian statehood dominating the UN session?</h2>This year’s General Assembly has been dominated by calls for Palestinian recognition and urgent action on Gaza. France, Belgium, Malta, Luxembourg and Canada have joined the growing list of countries extending recognition, with President Emmanuel Macron declaring, “Today, France recognises the state of Palestine.”Israel has rejected the move, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisting, “A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River.” The US also opposed the announcements, with the White House warning recognition would be seen as a “reward to Hamas.”Despite the audio problems, momentum for Palestinian statehood has gathered pace, with around 150 countries now backing recognition. Britain, France, Canada and others have shifted their positions in recent months, while Japan has hinted its own decision is imminent.

Technical glitches at the UN cut off speeches by Erdogan, Carney and Prabowo on Gaza and Palestinian statehood. Despite interruptions, momentum for Palestine’s recognition grew, with over 150 nations backing it.

A series of technical breakdowns at the United Nations left world leaders struggling to be heard as they addressed the General Assembly on Gaza and Palestinian statehood. Microphone failures interrupted speeches by Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, and Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto. UN staff later said the glitches were due to equipment faults in the General Assembly hall, stressing there was “no indication” of deliberate interference. Also read: Mass funeral in Pakistan after military bombs Khyber Pakhtunkhwa village killing 30 What happened to Indonesia’s president mid-speech? On Tuesday, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto was outlining plans to send peacekeepers to Gaza when his microphone suddenly went silent. The interpreter was left unable to continue until the feed returned seconds later. Erdogan’s warning on Gaza cut short Hours earlier, Turkish President Erdogan was denouncing what he called Israel’s “genocide in Gaza” and urging immediate recognition of Palestine when his audio failed. Delegates briefly heard the interpreter say, “Cannot hear the President, his voice is gone.” The sound came back soon after, but not before confusion spread through the hall. Canada’s Palestine recognition met with cheers, then silence The most dramatic disruption came when Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney formally recognised the State of Palestine. His declaration, “In this context, Canada recognises the state of Palestine,” drew applause from delegates. Moments later, his microphone cut out completely, raising questions about the timing of the glitch. One delegate later remarked, “The recognition was heard loud and clear, even if the microphone was not.” Why is Palestinian statehood dominating the UN session? This year’s General Assembly has been dominated by calls for Palestinian recognition and urgent action on Gaza. France, Belgium, Malta, Luxembourg and Canada have joined the growing list of countries extending recognition, with President Emmanuel Macron declaring, “Today, France recognises the state of Palestine.” Israel has rejected the move, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisting, “A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River.” The US also opposed the announcements, with the White House warning recognition would be seen as a “reward to Hamas.” Despite the audio problems, momentum for Palestinian statehood has gathered pace, with around 150 countries now backing recognition. Britain, France, Canada and others have shifted their positions in recent months, while Japan has hinted its own decision is imminent.

Technical glitches at the UN cut off speeches by Erdogan, Carney and Prabowo on Gaza and Palestinian statehood. Despite interruptions, momentum for Palestine’s recognition grew, with over 150 nations backing it.

Glitches or sabotage? From Turkey's Erdogan to Canada's Carney world leaders face microphone failures while raising Palestine, Gaza issue at UN

The Pakistani Air Force struck its own province killing 30 people, including women and children. And there are videos of the bodies of the deceased being carried out of homes in the Matre Dara village located in the Tirah Valley. The disturbing visuals are of people carrying their loved ones. During the wee hours of September 22, the forces dropped eight LS-6 bombs from JF-17 fighter jets. There has been no statement on the killing by the government or the military; the authorities have remained silent.&nbsp;&nbsp;Moeed Pirzada, a Pakistani TV anchor based in the US, shared a video, and he wrote, “This is not Gaza, it’s Pakistan.. If you get a break from Israel’s war, think a little about here too.” The village only had bodies being carried by men, which looked like a huge funeral procession and also highlighted the grim reality of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. &nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">یہ غازہ نہیں، پاکستان ہے..اسرائیل کی جنگ سے فرصت ملے تو، پاکستانیوں کچھ یہاں کا بھی سوچنا… <a href="https://t.co/O6pGB240PG">pic.twitter.com/O6pGB240PG</a>&mdash; Moeed Pirzada (@MoeedNj) <a href="https://twitter.com/MoeedNj/status/1970297120562278456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Pakistani Air Force struck its own province killing 30 people, including women and children. And there are videos of the bodies of the deceased being carried out of homes in the Matre Dara village located in the Tirah Valley. T

The Pakistani Air Force struck its own province killing 30 people, including women and children. And there are videos of the bodies of the deceased being carried out of homes in the Matre Dara village located in the Tirah Valley. The disturbing visuals are of people carrying their loved ones. During the wee hours of September 22, the forces dropped eight LS-6 bombs from JF-17 fighter jets. There has been no statement on the killing by the government or the military; the authorities have remained silent. Moeed Pirzada, a Pakistani TV anchor based in the US, shared a video, and he wrote, “This is not Gaza, it’s Pakistan.. If you get a break from Israel’s war, think a little about here too.” The village only had bodies being carried by men, which looked like a huge funeral procession and also highlighted the grim reality of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The Pakistani Air Force struck its own province killing 30 people, including women and children. And there are videos of the bodies of the deceased being carried out of homes in the Matre Dara village located in the Tirah Valley. T

Mass funeral in Pakistan after military bombs Khyber Pakhtunkhwa village killing 30

In New Zealand, a mother of two was found guilty on Tuesday (Sep 23) of killing her children and stashing their bodies in suitcases. Announcing the ruling in the high-profile case that came to be known as the ‘New Zealand suitcase murders’ and drew international attention, the prosecutor in her summary noted that the woman Hakyung Lee, "in sound mind, deliberately murdered" her children, eight-year-old Yuna Jo and six-year-old Minu Jo, before stuffing their corpses into suitcases.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-tells-pregnant-women-to-tough-it-out-without-paracetamol-claims-amish-have-no-autism-because-they-lack-tylenol-1758589438052">Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out’ without paracetamol, claims Amish have ‘no autism’ because they lack Tylenol</a><h2>The chilling murders</h2>Hakyung Lee, 45, a New Zealand citizen originally from South Korea, was extradited from Seoul in 2022 after the remains of her children, Yuna and Minu Jo, were discovered in a storage unit in South Auckland. The children, aged eight and six at the time of their deaths, had been dead for at least three to four years before the discovery.Lee had confessed to killing her children, so the trial focused not on whether she committed the murders, but on her mental state at the time. Under New Zealand law, defendants are presumed sane unless proven otherwise, meaning it was up to the defence to establish that Lee was not criminally responsible due to insanity.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-militarist-anarchist-enterprise-trump-signs-order-branding-antifa-a-terrorist-organisation-1758594113007">‘Militarist, anarchist enterprise’: Trump signs order branding Antifa a terrorist organisation</a><h2>Mental insanity or planned murders</h2>Hakyung Lee's lawyers argued that the death of her husband in 2017 had sent her into a depressive spiral. A forensic psychiatrist testified that she had experienced deep depression, suicidal thoughts, and guilt, and that she believed ending her children’s lives was the morally right action.The prosecution, however, presented a contrasting narrative. They pointed to Lee’s efforts to conceal the bodies, her decision to leave the country, and steps she had taken to distance herself from her previous life — including changing her name and severing ties with New Zealand — as evidence that she knew her actions were wrong. “Ms Lee deliberately, and in sound mind, deliberately murdered Minu and Yuna,” prosecutor Natalie Walker said in her closing statement, calling for a verdict of guilty.After just two hours of deliberation, the jury at Auckland High Court returned guilty verdicts. Justice Geoffrey Venning acknowledged the natural sympathy jurors might feel for the children and, separately, for Lee herself, but emphasised the importance of basing the verdict on evidence.Lee now faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, with a minimum non-parole period of 10 years. Before being sent to prison, she may be detained in a mental health facility under a compulsory treatment order. Sentencing is scheduled for November.Throughout the three-week trial, Lee remained largely silent, sitting with her head bowed and hair obscuring her face. Although she technically represented herself, she did not participate in or ask questions during the proceedings. &nbsp;

In a high-profile case known as the "New Zealand suitcase murders," a jury on Tuesday found Hakyung Lee, a mother of two, guilty of the murders of her children. 

In New Zealand, a mother of two was found guilty on Tuesday (Sep 23) of killing her children and stashing their bodies in suitcases. Announcing the ruling in the high-profile case that came to be known as the ‘New Zealand suitcase murders’ and drew international attention, the prosecutor in her summary noted that the woman Hakyung Lee, "in sound mind, deliberately murdered" her children, eight-year-old Yuna Jo and six-year-old Minu Jo, before stuffing their corpses into suitcases. Also read | Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out’ without paracetamol, claims Amish have ‘no autism’ because they lack Tylenol The chilling murders Hakyung Lee, 45, a New Zealand citizen originally from South Korea, was extradited from Seoul in 2022 after the remains of her children, Yuna and Minu Jo, were discovered in a storage unit in South Auckland. The children, aged eight and six at the time of their deaths, had been dead for at least three to four years before the discovery. Lee had confessed to killing her children, so the trial focused not on whether she committed the murders, but on her mental state at the time. Under New Zealand law, defendants are presumed sane unless proven otherwise, meaning it was up to the defence to establish that Lee was not criminally responsible due to insanity. Also read | ‘Militarist, anarchist enterprise’: Trump signs order branding Antifa a terrorist organisation Mental insanity or planned murders Hakyung Lee's lawyers argued that the death of her husband in 2017 had sent her into a depressive spiral. A forensic psychiatrist testified that she had experienced deep depression, suicidal thoughts, and guilt, and that she believed ending her children’s lives was the morally right action. The prosecution, however, presented a contrasting narrative. They pointed to Lee’s efforts to conceal the bodies, her decision to leave the country, and steps she had taken to distance herself from her previous life — including changing her name and severing ties with New Zealand — as evidence that she knew her actions were wrong. “Ms Lee deliberately, and in sound mind, deliberately murdered Minu and Yuna,” prosecutor Natalie Walker said in her closing statement, calling for a verdict of guilty. After just two hours of deliberation, the jury at Auckland High Court returned guilty verdicts. Justice Geoffrey Venning acknowledged the natural sympathy jurors might feel for the children and, separately, for Lee herself, but emphasised the importance of basing the verdict on evidence. Lee now faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, with a minimum non-parole period of 10 years. Before being sent to prison, she may be detained in a mental health facility under a compulsory treatment order. Sentencing is scheduled for November. Throughout the three-week trial, Lee remained largely silent, sitting with her head bowed and hair obscuring her face. Although she technically represented herself, she did not participate in or ask questions during the proceedings.

In a high-profile case known as the "New Zealand suitcase murders," a jury on Tuesday found Hakyung Lee, a mother of two, guilty of the murders of her children.

Mother of two found guilty of killing children in New Zealand’s chilling ‘suitcase murders’ case

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Monday (Sep 22) urged the United Nations to admit Palestine as a full member state, stepping up his calls for recognition at a French-led summit in New York. Calling the summit, which Israel and its chief backer, the United States, did not attend, "only the beginning", Sanchez insisted that the process of Palestine joining the United Nations must be completed soon.<h2>The process needs to be completed soon: Sanchez</h2>“This conference marks a milestone, but it’s not the end of the road. It’s only the beginning,” Sanchez told the UN General Assembly. “The State of Palestine must be a full member of the United Nations," he insisted.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/america-us-labels-recognition-of-palestinian-state-by-uk-australia-canada-and-other-allies-performative-israel-gaza-war-1758504199285">US State Department labels recognition of Palestinian state by UK and other allies 'performative': Report</a>The Spanish PM told the landmark UK summit that the process of Palestine's state joining the UN as a full member state "must be completed as soon as possible, on an equal footing with other states.”Sanchez, one of Europe’s fiercest critics of Israel’s war in Gaza, also called for “immediate measures to stop the barbarism and make peace possible.” Spain, along with Ireland and Norway, formally recognised Palestine in May, prompting sharp pushback from Israel.Palestinian Authority president Mahmud Abbas, who was not allowed to attend in person by Washington, addressed the summit virtually and urged Hamas to surrender its weapons to his administration. “We also condemn the killing and detention of civilians, including Hamas actions on October 7, 2023,” he said.<h2>Netanyahu stands firm against Palestinian statehood</h2>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to block Palestinian statehood, while far-right ministers in his coalition openly advocate annexing the West Bank. “It will not happen. No Palestinian state will be established west of the Jordan River,” Netanyahu said in a televised address, denouncing the recognition push as “absurd” and a danger to Israel’s survival. He vowed instead to expand Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, which Israel has controlled since 1967 in defiance of international law.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-to-recognise-palestine-today-despite-israel-slamming-move-as-rewarding-terrorism-was-the-move-delayed-by-trump-visit-1758428851590">UK to recognise Palestine today despite Israel slamming move as 'rewarding terrorism'. Was it delayed by Trump's visit?</a>The Biden administration has also opposed the latest push, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying President Trump views recognition as “a reward to Hamas.” On Sunday (Sep 21), a US State Department spokesperson, while addressing the recent recognition of a Palestinian state by Britain, Australia, Canada, and Portugal, said that America's "focus remains on serious diplomacy, not performative gestures."&nbsp;

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has called for the admission of Palestine as a full member state. He stated that the process “must be completed as soon as possible, on an equal footing with other states.”

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Monday (Sep 22) urged the United Nations to admit Palestine as a full member state, stepping up his calls for recognition at a French-led summit in New York. Calling the summit, which Israel and its chief backer, the United States, did not attend, "only the beginning", Sanchez insisted that the process of Palestine joining the United Nations must be completed soon. The process needs to be completed soon: Sanchez “This conference marks a milestone, but it’s not the end of the road. It’s only the beginning,” Sanchez told the UN General Assembly. “The State of Palestine must be a full member of the United Nations," he insisted. Also read | US State Department labels recognition of Palestinian state by UK and other allies 'performative': Report The Spanish PM told the landmark UK summit that the process of Palestine's state joining the UN as a full member state "must be completed as soon as possible, on an equal footing with other states.” Sanchez, one of Europe’s fiercest critics of Israel’s war in Gaza, also called for “immediate measures to stop the barbarism and make peace possible.” Spain, along with Ireland and Norway, formally recognised Palestine in May, prompting sharp pushback from Israel. Palestinian Authority president Mahmud Abbas, who was not allowed to attend in person by Washington, addressed the summit virtually and urged Hamas to surrender its weapons to his administration. “We also condemn the killing and detention of civilians, including Hamas actions on October 7, 2023,” he said. Netanyahu stands firm against Palestinian statehood Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to block Palestinian statehood, while far-right ministers in his coalition openly advocate annexing the West Bank. “It will not happen. No Palestinian state will be established west of the Jordan River,” Netanyahu said in a televised address, denouncing the recognition push as “absurd” and a danger to Israel’s survival. He vowed instead to expand Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, which Israel has controlled since 1967 in defiance of international law. Also read | UK to recognise Palestine today despite Israel slamming move as 'rewarding terrorism'. Was it delayed by Trump's visit? The Biden administration has also opposed the latest push, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying President Trump views recognition as “a reward to Hamas.” On Sunday (Sep 21), a US State Department spokesperson, while addressing the recent recognition of a Palestinian state by Britain, Australia, Canada, and Portugal, said that America's "focus remains on serious diplomacy, not performative gestures."

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has called for the admission of Palestine as a full member state. He stated that the process “must be completed as soon as possible, on an equal footing with other states.”

Spain's Sanchez demands UN membership for Palestine, slams ‘barbarism’ in Gaza

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Sep 22) signed an executive order branding Antifa as a domestic terrorist organisation, a sweeping move that civil liberties advocates warn could be used to target political dissent. The White House said the order was triggered by the September 10 assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, a close Trump ally.<h2>What is Antifa?</h2>Antifa is short for "anti-fascist" and is a broad term used to describe far-left groups. Ever since Trump first mooted the organisation last week, there have been questions on how to define it.In the text of the order, Trump described Antifa as a “militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government,” accusing the diffuse left-wing movement of using “violence and terrorism” to silence free speech.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-tells-pregnant-women-to-tough-it-out-without-paracetamol-claims-amish-have-no-autism-because-they-lack-tylenol-1758589438052">Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out’ without paracetamol, claims Amish have ‘no autism’ because they lack Tylenol</a>“Because of the aforementioned pattern of political violence designed to suppress lawful political activity and obstruct the rule of law, I hereby designate Antifa as a 'domestic terrorist organisation',” Trump declared.The order goes further than previous threats, authorising federal authorities to act against “any person claiming to act on behalf of Antifa, or for which Antifa or any person claiming to act on behalf of Antifa provided material support.”The decision comes as the US grapples with a sharp rise in political violence. Prosecutors say Kirk’s suspected killer, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, cited the conservative figure’s “hatred” as his motive, but investigators have found no evidence connecting him to Antifa or other organised groups.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-i-should-get-a-nobel-prize-for-each-one-trump-demands-seven-nobels-for-solving-7-wars-once-again-takes-credit-for-india-pak-war-1758442668041">'I should get a Nobel Prize for each one': Trump demands seven Nobels for 'solving' 7 wars</a><h2>Critics slam move as attempt to stifle opposition</h2>Critics have warned that Trump's move risks criminalising political opposition and could be used to quash dissent. Antifa, shorthand for “anti-fascist,” traces its roots to socialist groups in 1930s Germany that resisted Hitler. In the US, it has become known for black-clad activists who confront far-right demonstrators, sometimes violently, while citing self-defence against fascism and racism. Trump, as per AFP, has long sought to pin episodes of unrest on Antifa, including the 2017 Charlottesville clashes and even the January 6 Capitol riot.&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order designating Antifa as a "domestic terrorist organisation." This has been announced in the wake of the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Sep 22) signed an executive order branding Antifa as a domestic terrorist organisation, a sweeping move that civil liberties advocates warn could be used to target political dissent. The White House said the order was triggered by the September 10 assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, a close Trump ally. What is Antifa? Antifa is short for "anti-fascist" and is a broad term used to describe far-left groups. Ever since Trump first mooted the organisation last week, there have been questions on how to define it. In the text of the order, Trump described Antifa as a “militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government,” accusing the diffuse left-wing movement of using “violence and terrorism” to silence free speech. Also read | Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out’ without paracetamol, claims Amish have ‘no autism’ because they lack Tylenol “Because of the aforementioned pattern of political violence designed to suppress lawful political activity and obstruct the rule of law, I hereby designate Antifa as a 'domestic terrorist organisation',” Trump declared. The order goes further than previous threats, authorising federal authorities to act against “any person claiming to act on behalf of Antifa, or for which Antifa or any person claiming to act on behalf of Antifa provided material support.” The decision comes as the US grapples with a sharp rise in political violence. Prosecutors say Kirk’s suspected killer, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, cited the conservative figure’s “hatred” as his motive, but investigators have found no evidence connecting him to Antifa or other organised groups. Also read | 'I should get a Nobel Prize for each one': Trump demands seven Nobels for 'solving' 7 wars Critics slam move as attempt to stifle opposition Critics have warned that Trump's move risks criminalising political opposition and could be used to quash dissent. Antifa, shorthand for “anti-fascist,” traces its roots to socialist groups in 1930s Germany that resisted Hitler. In the US, it has become known for black-clad activists who confront far-right demonstrators, sometimes violently, while citing self-defence against fascism and racism. Trump, as per AFP, has long sought to pin episodes of unrest on Antifa, including the 2017 Charlottesville clashes and even the January 6 Capitol riot.

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order designating Antifa as a "domestic terrorist organisation." This has been announced in the wake of the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk

‘Militarist, anarchist enterprise’: Trump signs order branding Antifa a terrorist organisation

President Donald Trump on Monday (Sep 22) told pregnant women in the United States to avoid Tylenol and “tough it out,” even as doctors warned his sweeping advice was dangerous and unscientific. Speaking at a White House press conference, Trump tied the painkiller, which is known as paracetamol outside America, to autism — a link not backed by medical consensus — and called for major changes to the way babies are vaccinated. At one point, he claimed that Cuba “has virtually no autism” because it lacks Tylenol and pointed to the Amish as another group “with essentially no autism.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/paracetamol-causes-autism-trump-admin-to-reveal-alarming-side-effects-of-tylenol-use-by-pregnant-women-1758529171001">Paracetamol causes autism? Trump admin to reveal alarming side effects of Tylenol use by pregnant women</a><h2>'Fight like hell,' but don't take FDA-approved medicine?</h2>In a speech that was reminiscent of his anti-vaccination push, Donald Trump repeatedly said, “Don’t take it (Tylenol),” adding that pregnant women should only consider acetaminophen, the main ingredient in Tylenol, if battling an “extremely high fever.” He then told them to “fight like hell not to take it.”The US president claimed that, “There's a rumour—and I don't know if it's so or not—that Cuba, they don't have Tylenol because they don't have the money for Tylenol. And they have virtually no autism.” He also contended that the Amish, traditionalist people known for their horse-drawn carts and rejection of modern technology, "have essentially no autism".However, he admitted that all his theories were just theories. "This is based on what I feel," he said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-shocks-crowd-at-charlie-kirk-s-memorial-says-i-hate-my-opponents-even-as-slain-influencer-s-widow-preaches-love-watch-video-1758520418898">Trump shocks crowd at Charlie Kirk’s memorial, says ‘I hate my opponents’ even as slain influencer’s widow preaches love. Watch!</a><h2>Doctors raise an alarm</h2>Health experts immediately pushed back. This is "dangerous" and "full of misinformation,” said Arthur Caplan, head of medical ethics at NYU. “I worry that pregnant women are going to feel guilty if they took Tylenol. They're going to feel they let down their babies. They're going to feel that they were unethical in terms of trying to treat fever. That's just not fair, and it's not anything that anybody should be feeling.”The Food and Drug Administration was far more cautious, saying "a causal relationship (between acetaminophen and autism) has not been established", and debate in the scientific community is ongoing.&nbsp;

During a White House press conference on Monday, President Donald Trump told pregnant women to avoid taking Tylenol, insisting that he believes the painkiller is linked to autism. He encouraged women to "fight like hell" not to take the drug, commonly known as paracetamol.

President Donald Trump on Monday (Sep 22) told pregnant women in the United States to avoid Tylenol and “tough it out,” even as doctors warned his sweeping advice was dangerous and unscientific. Speaking at a White House press conference, Trump tied the painkiller, which is known as paracetamol outside America, to autism — a link not backed by medical consensus — and called for major changes to the way babies are vaccinated. At one point, he claimed that Cuba “has virtually no autism” because it lacks Tylenol and pointed to the Amish as another group “with essentially no autism.” Also read | Paracetamol causes autism? Trump admin to reveal alarming side effects of Tylenol use by pregnant women 'Fight like hell,' but don't take FDA-approved medicine? In a speech that was reminiscent of his anti-vaccination push, Donald Trump repeatedly said, “Don’t take it (Tylenol),” adding that pregnant women should only consider acetaminophen, the main ingredient in Tylenol, if battling an “extremely high fever.” He then told them to “fight like hell not to take it.” The US president claimed that, “There's a rumour—and I don't know if it's so or not—that Cuba, they don't have Tylenol because they don't have the money for Tylenol. And they have virtually no autism.” He also contended that the Amish, traditionalist people known for their horse-drawn carts and rejection of modern technology, "have essentially no autism". However, he admitted that all his theories were just theories. "This is based on what I feel," he said. Also read | Trump shocks crowd at Charlie Kirk’s memorial, says ‘I hate my opponents’ even as slain influencer’s widow preaches love. Watch! Doctors raise an alarm Health experts immediately pushed back. This is "dangerous" and "full of misinformation,” said Arthur Caplan, head of medical ethics at NYU. “I worry that pregnant women are going to feel guilty if they took Tylenol. They're going to feel they let down their babies. They're going to feel that they were unethical in terms of trying to treat fever. That's just not fair, and it's not anything that anybody should be feeling.” The Food and Drug Administration was far more cautious, saying "a causal relationship (between acetaminophen and autism) has not been established", and debate in the scientific community is ongoing.

During a White House press conference on Monday, President Donald Trump told pregnant women to avoid taking Tylenol, insisting that he believes the painkiller is linked to autism. He encouraged women to "fight like hell" not to take the drug, commonly known as paracetamol.

Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out’ without paracetamol, claims Amish have ‘no autism’ because they lack Tylenol

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said on Monday that the terrorist group Hamas must have “no role” in governing Gaza in the future and called on the militant group to hand over its weapons. “Hamas and other factions must surrender their weapons to the Palestinian Authority,” Abbas said via video link at a summit on a two-state solution at the United Nations, where France announced its recognition of the Palestinian state.“What we want is one unified state without weapons, a state with one law and one legitimate security forces,” Abbas said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-to-slam-globalist-institutions-decaying-world-order-in-un-speech-white-house-1758563791794">Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech: White House</a>&nbsp;Abbas also underscored his commitment to hold presidential and parliamentary elections after the end of the war. “We will draft an interim constitution within three months to ensure the transfer of power from the authority to the state,” he added.The leader also called for more nations to recognise a Palestinian state.“We commend the positions of those countries that recognised the state of Palestine, we call on those who have not yet done so to follow suit. We call for your support so that Palestine becomes a fully-fledged member of the United Nations,” he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-likely-to-hit-entire-international-criminal-court-with-sanctions-this-week-report-1758569925784">US likely to hit entire International Criminal Court with sanctions this week: Report</a>&nbsp;<h2>Expanding settlements in West Bank ‘eroding prospects’ for a solution: UNGA president</h2>&nbsp;United Nations General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock exphasised the importance of a two-state solution and condemned the expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank.&nbsp;&nbsp;She said the settlement expansions and demolition in the occupied West Bank are “eroding any prospects for a political solution.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/murdochs-dell-ellison-to-have-a-role-in-tiktok-after-deal-says-trump-1758476539209">Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump</a>&nbsp;Israel has approved a controversial plan to build thousands of new housing units in the West Bank that would cut the territory in two, with far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich previously saying, “The Palestinian state is being erased from the table not with slogans, but with actions.”&nbsp;“The horrors of Gaza make equally clear that we cannot allow such devastation to happen again,” Baerbock said.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas also underscored his commitment to hold presidential and parliamentary elections after the end of the war and said an interim constitution will be drafted within three months to ensure the transfer of power from the authority to the state.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said on Monday that the terrorist group Hamas must have “no role” in governing Gaza in the future and called on the militant group to hand over its weapons. “Hamas and other factions must surrender their weapons to the Palestinian Authority,” Abbas said via video link at a summit on a two-state solution at the United Nations, where France announced its recognition of the Palestinian state. “What we want is one unified state without weapons, a state with one law and one legitimate security forces,” Abbas said. Also Read: Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech: White House Abbas also underscored his commitment to hold presidential and parliamentary elections after the end of the war. “We will draft an interim constitution within three months to ensure the transfer of power from the authority to the state,” he added. The leader also called for more nations to recognise a Palestinian state. “We commend the positions of those countries that recognised the state of Palestine, we call on those who have not yet done so to follow suit. We call for your support so that Palestine becomes a fully-fledged member of the United Nations,” he said. Also Read: US likely to hit entire International Criminal Court with sanctions this week: Report Expanding settlements in West Bank ‘eroding prospects’ for a solution: UNGA president United Nations General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock exphasised the importance of a two-state solution and condemned the expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank. She said the settlement expansions and demolition in the occupied West Bank are “eroding any prospects for a political solution.” Also Read: Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump Israel has approved a controversial plan to build thousands of new housing units in the West Bank that would cut the territory in two, with far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich previously saying, “The Palestinian state is being erased from the table not with slogans, but with actions.” “The horrors of Gaza make equally clear that we cannot allow such devastation to happen again,” Baerbock said.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas also underscored his commitment to hold presidential and parliamentary elections after the end of the war and said an interim constitution will be drafted within three months to ensure the transfer of power from the authority to the state.

‘Surrender weapons’, Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas tells Hamas

France recognised the Palestinian state on Monday, joining several Western countries, ahead of the annual UN General Assembly meeting in New York. President Emmanuel Macron of France announced his nation’s recognition of the state of Palestine at the United Nations, drawing applause and a standing ovation from some of the attendees. Macron began his speech by denouncing the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023, and demanding that the remaining hostages be freed and antisemitism be smothered. Macron said he has worked repeatedly to try to convince Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel that France’s recognition of a Palestinian state is not a reward to Hamas or meant to inflame antisemitism in France.&nbsp;Macron said that the recognition of a Palestinian state is the “only solution that will allow for Israel to live in peace,” calling the move a “defeat for Hamas.” Speaking at a summit on a two-state solution in New York, Macron said, “We must do everything within our power to preserve the very possibility of a two-state solution, Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security.”&nbsp;The recognition of the rights of the Palestinian people “takes nothing away from the rights of the people of Israel, who France supported from day one,” he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-to-slam-globalist-institutions-decaying-world-order-in-un-speech-white-house-1758563791794">Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech: White House</a>&nbsp;Palestinian statehood was the focus of the conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia at the United Nations on Monday, as world leaders converge on New York for the annual gathering of the UN General Assembly.&nbsp;About 10 countries have either recognised Palestine formally as a state, including France and Belgium, which will join 147 other 193 UN member states that already consider Palestine a sovereign nation. Australia, Britain, Canada and Portugal confirmed on Sunday that they now formally recognise Palestinian statehood.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-likely-to-hit-entire-international-criminal-court-with-sanctions-this-week-report-1758569925784">US likely to hit entire International Criminal Court with sanctions this week: Report</a>&nbsp;The recognition of Palestinian state by Australia, Britain, Canada and Portugal on Sunday piled pressure on Israel which has been intensifying its war in Gaza, which has killed more than 65,000 Palestinians, and turned the Palestinian enclave to ruins.The United States, Israel’s closest ally, has criticised the recognition by Western governments, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the move will “embolden [Hamas]” and make it harder to end the war.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/murdochs-dell-ellison-to-have-a-role-in-tiktok-after-deal-says-trump-1758476539209">Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump</a>&nbsp;Palestine is expected to top the agenda of the UNGA, to be attended by more than 140 world leaders. But Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas won’t be able to attend, as the US denied him a visa.

Palestinian statehood was the focus of the conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia at the United Nations on Monday, as world leaders converge on New York for the annual gathering of the UN General Assembly.

France recognised the Palestinian state on Monday, joining several Western countries, ahead of the annual UN General Assembly meeting in New York. President Emmanuel Macron of France announced his nation’s recognition of the state of Palestine at the United Nations, drawing applause and a standing ovation from some of the attendees. Macron began his speech by denouncing the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023, and demanding that the remaining hostages be freed and antisemitism be smothered. Macron said he has worked repeatedly to try to convince Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel that France’s recognition of a Palestinian state is not a reward to Hamas or meant to inflame antisemitism in France. Macron said that the recognition of a Palestinian state is the “only solution that will allow for Israel to live in peace,” calling the move a “defeat for Hamas.” Speaking at a summit on a two-state solution in New York, Macron said, “We must do everything within our power to preserve the very possibility of a two-state solution, Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security.” The recognition of the rights of the Palestinian people “takes nothing away from the rights of the people of Israel, who France supported from day one,” he added. Also Read: Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech: White House Palestinian statehood was the focus of the conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia at the United Nations on Monday, as world leaders converge on New York for the annual gathering of the UN General Assembly. About 10 countries have either recognised Palestine formally as a state, including France and Belgium, which will join 147 other 193 UN member states that already consider Palestine a sovereign nation. Australia, Britain, Canada and Portugal confirmed on Sunday that they now formally recognise Palestinian statehood. Also Read: US likely to hit entire International Criminal Court with sanctions this week: Report The recognition of Palestinian state by Australia, Britain, Canada and Portugal on Sunday piled pressure on Israel which has been intensifying its war in Gaza, which has killed more than 65,000 Palestinians, and turned the Palestinian enclave to ruins. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, has criticised the recognition by Western governments, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the move will “embolden [Hamas]” and make it harder to end the war. Also Read: Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump Palestine is expected to top the agenda of the UNGA, to be attended by more than 140 world leaders. But Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas won’t be able to attend, as the US denied him a visa.

Palestinian statehood was the focus of the conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia at the United Nations on Monday, as world leaders converge on New York for the annual gathering of the UN General Assembly.

France recognises Palestinian state ahead of UNGA meeting, Macron says it’s not a reward to Hamas

The United States is considering imposing sanctions against the entire International Criminal Court this week in retaliation for investigations of suspected Israeli war crimes. The sanctions could put the court’s day-to-day operations in jeopardy. Washington has already imposed targeted sanctions on several prosecutors and judges at the court and naming the court itself in the sanctions list would be a major escalation.Israel and the United States are not ICC members. However, the court considers the state of Palestine as a member and has ruled that this gives it jurisdiction over actions on Palestinian territory. Israel and the United States reject this notion. The White House imposed sanctions in February on the court’s lead prosecutor, Karim Khan, who had requested the warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/murdochs-dell-ellison-to-have-a-role-in-tiktok-after-deal-says-trump-1758476539209">Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump</a>&nbsp;As per an exclusive Reuters report, six sources, all speaking on condition of anonymity, said a decision on such “entity sanctions” was expected soon.A source said the court officials had already held emergency meetings to discuss the impact of the probable blanket sanctions.A US State Department spokesperson accused the court of asserting what it said was its “purported jurisdiction” over US and Israeli personnel and said that Washington was going to take further steps.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-afraid-of-our-talent-says-piyush-goyal-after-us-h-1b-visa-fee-hike-urges-indians-to-return-innovate-in-india-1758458036830">‘Afraid of our talent,’ says Piyush Goyal after US H-1B visa fee hike, urges Indians to return, innovate in India</a>&nbsp;“It (the ICC) has the opportunity to change course by making critical and appropriate structural changes. The US will take additional steps to protect our brave service members and others as long as the ICC continues to present a threat to our national interests,” the spokesperson said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-to-slam-globalist-institutions-decaying-world-order-in-un-speech-white-house-1758563791794">Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech: White House</a><h2>What is the International Criminal Court?</h2>&nbsp;The ICC was established in 2002 to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression when member states are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. It can prosecute crimes committed by nationals of member states or on the territory of member states by other actors.The court has 125 member states and its budget for 2025 is about 195 million euros ($202 million).&nbsp;The ICC says there are 32 cases before it, with some having more than one suspect. ICC judges have issued at least 60 arrest warrants.

Israel and the United States are not ICC members. However, the court considers the state of Palestine as a member and has ruled that this gives it jurisdiction over actions on Palestinian territory. Israel and the United States reject this notion. 

The United States is considering imposing sanctions against the entire International Criminal Court this week in retaliation for investigations of suspected Israeli war crimes. The sanctions could put the court’s day-to-day operations in jeopardy. Washington has already imposed targeted sanctions on several prosecutors and judges at the court and naming the court itself in the sanctions list would be a major escalation. Israel and the United States are not ICC members. However, the court considers the state of Palestine as a member and has ruled that this gives it jurisdiction over actions on Palestinian territory. Israel and the United States reject this notion. The White House imposed sanctions in February on the court’s lead prosecutor, Karim Khan, who had requested the warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant. Also Read: Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump As per an exclusive Reuters report, six sources, all speaking on condition of anonymity, said a decision on such “entity sanctions” was expected soon. A source said the court officials had already held emergency meetings to discuss the impact of the probable blanket sanctions. A US State Department spokesperson accused the court of asserting what it said was its “purported jurisdiction” over US and Israeli personnel and said that Washington was going to take further steps. Also Read: ‘Afraid of our talent,’ says Piyush Goyal after US H-1B visa fee hike, urges Indians to return, innovate in India “It (the ICC) has the opportunity to change course by making critical and appropriate structural changes. The US will take additional steps to protect our brave service members and others as long as the ICC continues to present a threat to our national interests,” the spokesperson said. Also Read: Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech: White House What is the International Criminal Court? The ICC was established in 2002 to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression when member states are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. It can prosecute crimes committed by nationals of member states or on the territory of member states by other actors. The court has 125 member states and its budget for 2025 is about 195 million euros ($202 million). The ICC says there are 32 cases before it, with some having more than one suspect. ICC judges have issued at least 60 arrest warrants.

Israel and the United States are not ICC members. However, the court considers the state of Palestine as a member and has ruled that this gives it jurisdiction over actions on Palestinian territory. Israel and the United States reject this notion.&nbsp;

US likely to hit entire International Criminal Court with sanctions this week: Report

Hours after Russia denied that its aircraft entered Estonia's airspace, the NATO nations slammed the country at the United Nations, calling it a ‘threat to world peace’. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said that the Russian incursion into Estonia was 'deliberate provocation' which ‘could have ended with devastating results.’ Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that it will shoot down any objects that violate Polish airspace. Estonia called Russia as 'real threat to global peace and security' at UN Security Council meeting. US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz also echoed the same sentiments and said America will defend every inch of NATO territory.&nbsp;Indirectly targeting Moscow during the session, Kallas said that ‘there's a country in this room' that constantly violates the norms of the UN. She also mocked Russian claims that its repeated violations of Nato airspace were accidental. Estonian foreign minister Margus Tsahkna showed closeup pictures of the Russian jets, stressing they all “carried missiles and were combat ready.” “We remember the occupation of Georgia in 2008, 2014 Crimea, 2022 aggression against Ukraine… So please don’t lie again. Hard evidence is here,” he added. “The United States and our allies will defend every inch of Nato territory. Russia must urgently stop such dangerous behaviour," Waltz said.<h2>‘If another missile enters our airspace...’</h2>European allies have vowed to shoot down any Russian aircraft if they are found violating their airspace. “If another missile or aircraft enters our space without permission, deliberately or by mistake, and gets shot down and the wreckage falls on Nato territory, please don’t come here to whine about it,” Poland’s foreign minister, Radosław Sikorski, told an emergency meeting of the UN security council in New York.<h2>Russia's reaction&nbsp;</h2>Russia on Monday (Sep 22) responded to the accusations made by NATO member state Estonia, claiming that they do not have any evidence to back their claims. Russia said that Estonia is falsely claiming that Russian military jets had violated its airspace last week. It also said that the accusations were made by the NATO member to ratchet up East-West tensions. Estonia had on Friday claimed that three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets had entered Estonian airspace without permission and stayed for a total of 12 minutes before they were forced to withdraw. The said incursion by Russia came over a week after more than 20 Russian drones entered Polish airspace, prompting NATO jets to shoot some of them down. &nbsp;

Leaders at the UN Security Council, including Washington's new envoy to the United Nations, condemn Russia during an emergency meeting over an incursion by Russian fighter jets into NATO-member Estonia's airspace. Russia had earlier denied the allegations and called it baseless

Hours after Russia denied that its aircraft entered Estonia's airspace, the NATO nations slammed the country at the United Nations, calling it a ‘threat to world peace’. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said that the Russian incursion into Estonia was 'deliberate provocation' which ‘could have ended with devastating results.’ Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that it will shoot down any objects that violate Polish airspace. Estonia called Russia as 'real threat to global peace and security' at UN Security Council meeting. US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz also echoed the same sentiments and said America will defend every inch of NATO territory. Indirectly targeting Moscow during the session, Kallas said that ‘there's a country in this room' that constantly violates the norms of the UN. She also mocked Russian claims that its repeated violations of Nato airspace were accidental. Estonian foreign minister Margus Tsahkna showed closeup pictures of the Russian jets, stressing they all “carried missiles and were combat ready.” “We remember the occupation of Georgia in 2008, 2014 Crimea, 2022 aggression against Ukraine… So please don’t lie again. Hard evidence is here,” he added. “The United States and our allies will defend every inch of Nato territory. Russia must urgently stop such dangerous behaviour," Waltz said. ‘If another missile enters our airspace...’ European allies have vowed to shoot down any Russian aircraft if they are found violating their airspace. “If another missile or aircraft enters our space without permission, deliberately or by mistake, and gets shot down and the wreckage falls on Nato territory, please don’t come here to whine about it,” Poland’s foreign minister, Radosław Sikorski, told an emergency meeting of the UN security council in New York. Russia's reaction Russia on Monday (Sep 22) responded to the accusations made by NATO member state Estonia, claiming that they do not have any evidence to back their claims. Russia said that Estonia is falsely claiming that Russian military jets had violated its airspace last week. It also said that the accusations were made by the NATO member to ratchet up East-West tensions. Estonia had on Friday claimed that three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets had entered Estonian airspace without permission and stayed for a total of 12 minutes before they were forced to withdraw. The said incursion by Russia came over a week after more than 20 Russian drones entered Polish airspace, prompting NATO jets to shoot some of them down.

Leaders at the UN Security Council, including Washington's new envoy to the United Nations, condemn Russia during an emergency meeting over an incursion by Russian fighter jets into NATO-member Estonia's airspace. Russia had earlier denied the allegations and called it baseless

‘If another missile enters our airspace...’: NATO nations in UN issue BIG warning to Russia, call it 'real threat to global peace'

Nvidia said Monday it will invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI, building infrastructure for next-generation artificial intelligence.The strategic partnership aimed at deploying massive data center capacity unites generative AI star OpenAI with the leading maker of chips powering the technology."Compute infrastructure will be the basis for the economy of the future," OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said in a joint release."We will utilize what we're building with NVIDIA to both create new AI breakthroughs and empower people and businesses with them at scale."The partnership will enable San Francisco-based OpenAI to build and deploy AI data centers with Nvidia systems, representing millions of sophisticated graphics processing units (GPUs), according to the companies.The first Nvidia systems are expected to be operating in the second half of next year.OpenAI and Nvidia added that they will work together to optimize how the companies' hardware and software complement each other.No financial details were provided beyond the possible magnitude of Nvidia's investment in OpenAI.Tech industry rivals Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and Elon Musk's xAI have been pouring billions of dollars into artificial intelligence since the blockbuster launch of the first version of ChatGPT in late 2022.Nvidia has become a coveted source of high-performance GPUS tailored for generative AI.Chinese startup DeepSeek shook up the AI sector early this year with a model that delivers high performance using less costly chips.Silicon Valley-based Nvidia last week announced it would invest $5 billion in struggling chip rival Intel.The investment represents a significant commitment to Intel's turnaround efforts. Nvidia joined Japanese investment giant SoftBank and the US government in backing the once-dominant chipmaker, which has fallen behind in recent years after missing key technology shifts.Nvidia's GPUs, originally designed for gaming systems, have become the essential building blocks of artificial intelligence applications, with tech giants scrambling to secure them for their data centers and AI projects.OpenAI released a keenly awaited new generation of its hallmark ChatGPT last month, touting significant advancements in artificial intelligence capabilities as a global race over the technology accelerates.ChatGPT-5 was made available free to the more than 700 million who use the AI tool weekly, according to OpenAI.Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.&nbsp;

The partnership will enable San Francisco-based OpenAI to build and deploy AI data centers with Nvidia systems, representing millions of sophisticated graphics processing units (GPUs), according to the companies.

Nvidia said Monday it will invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI, building infrastructure for next-generation artificial intelligence. The strategic partnership aimed at deploying massive data center capacity unites generative AI star OpenAI with the leading maker of chips powering the technology. "Compute infrastructure will be the basis for the economy of the future," OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said in a joint release. "We will utilize what we're building with NVIDIA to both create new AI breakthroughs and empower people and businesses with them at scale." The partnership will enable San Francisco-based OpenAI to build and deploy AI data centers with Nvidia systems, representing millions of sophisticated graphics processing units (GPUs), according to the companies. The first Nvidia systems are expected to be operating in the second half of next year. OpenAI and Nvidia added that they will work together to optimize how the companies' hardware and software complement each other. No financial details were provided beyond the possible magnitude of Nvidia's investment in OpenAI. Tech industry rivals Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and Elon Musk's xAI have been pouring billions of dollars into artificial intelligence since the blockbuster launch of the first version of ChatGPT in late 2022. Nvidia has become a coveted source of high-performance GPUS tailored for generative AI. Chinese startup DeepSeek shook up the AI sector early this year with a model that delivers high performance using less costly chips. Silicon Valley-based Nvidia last week announced it would invest $5 billion in struggling chip rival Intel. The investment represents a significant commitment to Intel's turnaround efforts. Nvidia joined Japanese investment giant SoftBank and the US government in backing the once-dominant chipmaker, which has fallen behind in recent years after missing key technology shifts. Nvidia's GPUs, originally designed for gaming systems, have become the essential building blocks of artificial intelligence applications, with tech giants scrambling to secure them for their data centers and AI projects. OpenAI released a keenly awaited new generation of its hallmark ChatGPT last month, touting significant advancements in artificial intelligence capabilities as a global race over the technology accelerates. ChatGPT-5 was made available free to the more than 700 million who use the AI tool weekly, according to OpenAI. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The partnership will enable San Francisco-based OpenAI to build and deploy AI data centers with Nvidia systems, representing millions of sophisticated graphics processing units (GPUs), according to the companies.

Nvidia announces investment of up to $100 bn in OpenAI data centers

US President Donald Trump will hit out at the “globalist institutions” in a speech on Tuesday to the UN General Assembly, the White House shared on Monday. At the media briefing on Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump will “touch upon how globalist institutions have significantly decayed the world order, and he will articulate his straightforward and constructive vision for the world.” Leavitt also shared details of the meetings Trump plans to hold on Tuesday as world leaders head to the US for the United Nations General Assembly.Leavitt said the president would hold bilateral meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Argentinian President Javier Milei, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/murdochs-dell-ellison-to-have-a-role-in-tiktok-after-deal-says-trump-1758476539209">Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">.<a href="https://twitter.com/PressSec?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PressSec</a> says <a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a> will attend the 80th session of the UN General Assembly tomorrow, where he will speak, in part, about how &quot;globalist institutions have significantly decayed the world order&quot; and &quot;articulate his straightforward and constructive vision for the world.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/gJWAnVuSnr">pic.twitter.com/gJWAnVuSnr</a>&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1970175784242311401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;<h2>Trump to meet leaders of key Muslim nations</h2>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump will meet leaders of key Muslim countries while attending the UN General Assembly, amid heavy focus at the forum on Israel’s war in Gaza, the White House said.&nbsp;Trump will hold a "multilateral meeting" with Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan, Leavitt said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-afraid-of-our-talent-says-piyush-goyal-after-us-h-1b-visa-fee-hike-urges-indians-to-return-innovate-in-india-1758458036830">‘Afraid of our talent,’ says Piyush Goyal after US H-1B visa fee hike, urges Indians to return, innovate in India</a>&nbsp;Trump will also deliver a “major speech touting the renewal of American strength around the world” Tuesday morning and attend a reception with world leaders in the evening, she said.&nbsp;Trump will also meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Argentinian President Javier Milei at the United Nations General Assembly.The details of Trump’s expected meeting with Zelensky are still being worked out. Zelensky is urging Ukraine’s allies to take tough actions against Russia for its continued attacks on the country.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-do-not-live-in-fear-make-the-bold-move-zoho-founder-urges-indians-on-h1b-visas-to-return-home-1758464534936">‘Do not live in fear. Make the bold move’: Zoho founder urges Indians on H1B visas to return home</a>&nbsp;Trump’s meeting with Milei will take place in Manhattan, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a post on X.“Argentina is a systemically important U.S. ally in Latin America, and the @USTreasury stands ready to do what is needed within its mandate to support Argentina,” Bessent said. “All options for stabilisation are on the table.”&nbsp;<h2>White House rejects letter from Venezuela's Maduro</h2> The White House has dismissed a letter from Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro seeking dialogue with President Donald Trump, saying that it was full of “lies”. “There were a lot of lies that were repeated by Maduro in that letter, and the administration’s position on Venezuela has not changed,” said Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.&nbsp;&nbsp;“We view the Maduro regime as illegitimate, and the president has clearly shown that he’s willing to use any and all means necessary to stop the illegal trafficking of deadly drugs from the Venezuelan regime into the United States of America,” Leavitt added.&nbsp;<h2>Trump to sign TikTok deal later this week; Oracle to play key role</h2> White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirms Oracle will receive a copy of TikTok's algorithm to operate for U.S. users. The decision addresses US national security concerns over the China-based social media platform. The deal will bring the popular Chinese short-form video app TikTok under US control.Leavitt said that under the terms of the deal, “TikTok will be owned by a majority of American investors and controlled by a board of directors with extensive national security and cybersecurity credentials.”&nbsp;

Trump will meet leaders of key Muslim countries attending the UN General Assembly, amid heavy focus at the forum on Israel’s war in Gaza, the White House said. Trump will hold a "multilateral meeting" with Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, the UAE, and Jordan.

US President Donald Trump will hit out at the “globalist institutions” in a speech on Tuesday to the UN General Assembly, the White House shared on Monday. At the media briefing on Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump will “touch upon how globalist institutions have significantly decayed the world order, and he will articulate his straightforward and constructive vision for the world.” Leavitt also shared details of the meetings Trump plans to hold on Tuesday as world leaders head to the US for the United Nations General Assembly. Leavitt said the president would hold bilateral meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Argentinian President Javier Milei, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Also Read: Murdochs, Dell, Ellison to have a role in TikTok after deal, says Trump

Trump will meet leaders of key Muslim countries attending the UN General Assembly, amid heavy focus at the forum on Israel’s war in Gaza, the White House said. Trump will hold a "multilateral meeting" with Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, the UAE, and Jordan.

Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech: White House

The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, told AFP Monday that diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute over Iran's nuclear program were at a "difficult juncture" but dialogue would continue.The UN Security Council voted on Friday to reimpose UN sanctions that had been frozen, after three European governments activated the "snapback" mechanism in a decade-old nuclear agreement, accusing Iran of non-compliance."It's obviously quite a difficult juncture. It's a very difficult situation we are facing right now," the International Atomic Energy Agency chief said, adding that talks between involved parties were planned in New York for Monday."What's important is the communications are continuing. We are planning to see each other if possible today, Monday, here in New York, and perhaps more meetings during the week."Friday's vote means that the sanctions, which were suspended in return for curbs on Iran's nuclear activities set out in the 2015 deal, will take effect again on September 28 unless Iran can persuade the council to relent in the next week.Tehran said the action by the European powers -- Britain, France and Germany -- undermined months of engagement with the IAEA aimed at resuming monitoring and ensuring compliance with international rules.Grossi praised the active diplomacy of French President Emmanuel Macron to salvage a deal, and said that there were still lines of communication between Tehran and Washington.<h2>‘Avoid prolonged confrontation’</h2>"Emmanuel Macron is very present, has been historically, and I respect him enormously," Grossi said."I think the Special Envoy, Ambassador (Steve) Witkoff, has also been involved and actively exploring different channels and presenting a number of ideas," Grossi said.Grossi said his dialog with Witkoff had enabled him to understand Washington's position and red lines."And the IAEA is not a party to the agreement -- but it's indispensable in every scenario. So we continue the work with Ambassador Witkoff," Grossi said.Earlier this month, Iran and the IAEA reached an agreement in Cairo that would have allowed inspections of Iranian nuclear sites to resume.Iran had suspended them after Israel and the United States attacked its nuclear facilities in June.Western governments have long accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapons capability, an ambition Tehran denies.Tehran has also criticised the IAEA for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes.Paris, London, and Berlin have stressed their demands that the Islamic Republic grant IAEA inspectors full access to nuclear sites, including those damaged by Israeli and American attacks last June.They also call for a resumption of negotiations, particularly with the US side.Tehran says it is resisting political pressure and accuses the Europeans of not taking up a "balanced" proposal, the details of which have not been disclosed."We are not at a point where people are not talking to each other, and you have to convince them to come together," Grossi said."So does that mean that I am optimistic? Well, neither optimistic nor pessimistic," he said adding that he remained hopeful that "we can still have an agreement.""If we don't have it, I think we have to try to (right) the boat as soon as possible to avoid prolonged confrontation and perhaps more attacks."Grossi also said he would seek to succeed Antonio Guterres as Secretary-General of the UN when his term ends in December 2026.Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Paris, London, and Berlin have stressed their demands that the Islamic Republic grant IAEA inspectors full access to nuclear sites, including those damaged by Israeli and American attacks last June.

The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, told AFP Monday that diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute over Iran's nuclear program were at a "difficult juncture" but dialogue would continue. The UN Security Council voted on Friday to reimpose UN sanctions that had been frozen, after three European governments activated the "snapback" mechanism in a decade-old nuclear agreement, accusing Iran of non-compliance. "It's obviously quite a difficult juncture. It's a very difficult situation we are facing right now," the International Atomic Energy Agency chief said, adding that talks between involved parties were planned in New York for Monday. "What's important is the communications are continuing. We are planning to see each other if possible today, Monday, here in New York, and perhaps more meetings during the week." Friday's vote means that the sanctions, which were suspended in return for curbs on Iran's nuclear activities set out in the 2015 deal, will take effect again on September 28 unless Iran can persuade the council to relent in the next week. Tehran said the action by the European powers -- Britain, France and Germany -- undermined months of engagement with the IAEA aimed at resuming monitoring and ensuring compliance with international rules. Grossi praised the active diplomacy of French President Emmanuel Macron to salvage a deal, and said that there were still lines of communication between Tehran and Washington. ‘Avoid prolonged confrontation’ "Emmanuel Macron is very present, has been historically, and I respect him enormously," Grossi said. "I think the Special Envoy, Ambassador (Steve) Witkoff, has also been involved and actively exploring different channels and presenting a number of ideas," Grossi said. Grossi said his dialog with Witkoff had enabled him to understand Washington's position and red lines. "And the IAEA is not a party to the agreement -- but it's indispensable in every scenario. So we continue the work with Ambassador Witkoff," Grossi said. Earlier this month, Iran and the IAEA reached an agreement in Cairo that would have allowed inspections of Iranian nuclear sites to resume. Iran had suspended them after Israel and the United States attacked its nuclear facilities in June. Western governments have long accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapons capability, an ambition Tehran denies. Tehran has also criticised the IAEA for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes. Paris, London, and Berlin have stressed their demands that the Islamic Republic grant IAEA inspectors full access to nuclear sites, including those damaged by Israeli and American attacks last June. They also call for a resumption of negotiations, particularly with the US side. Tehran says it is resisting political pressure and accuses the Europeans of not taking up a "balanced" proposal, the details of which have not been disclosed. "We are not at a point where people are not talking to each other, and you have to convince them to come together," Grossi said. "So does that mean that I am optimistic? Well, neither optimistic nor pessimistic," he said adding that he remained hopeful that "we can still have an agreement." "If we don't have it, I think we have to try to (right) the boat as soon as possible to avoid prolonged confrontation and perhaps more attacks." Grossi also said he would seek to succeed Antonio Guterres as Secretary-General of the UN when his term ends in December 2026. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Paris, London, and Berlin have stressed their demands that the Islamic Republic grant IAEA inspectors full access to nuclear sites, including those damaged by Israeli and American attacks last June.

UN's nuclear watchdog says efforts to resolve issue on Iran's nuclear at a 'difficult juncture'

As the US decision to impose a $100,000 fee on high-skilled visa applications takes effect, reports suggest that the new rule announced by President Donald Trump may not apply to all stakeholders. Doctors may be exempted from the new H-1B visa fee hike, which has rattled the tech companies and workers in the country. The move has sparked fears among Indians, who are recipients of about three-quarters of visa applications in the US every year.According to Bloomberg, White House has said that the new $100,000 annual fee for H-1B visas will have “case-by-case exemptions if in the national interest.”“The Proclamation allows for potential exemptions, which can include physicians and medical residents,” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Bloomberg in a statement via email.The development comes amid concerns that the unprecedented fee could severely impact high-skilled professionals in the US technology and medical industry.After Trump announced imposing a $100,000 fee on the H-1B visas, the move was criticised by tech entrepreneurs in the US, including billionaire Elon Musk, who warned that the US does not have enough talent in the country to fill vacancies for important jobs in the tech sector. Major tech firms rely on Indian workers for such jobs.The Indian Ministry of External Affairs said that the full implications of the US decision were being studied, warning of humanitarian consequences. “This measure is likely to have humanitarian consequences by way of the disruption caused to families. Government hopes that these disruptions can be addressed suitably by the US authorities,” the MEA said in a statement.The H-1B visas allow companies to sponsor workers from abroad with specialised skills, including scientists, engineers, and computer programmers, to work in the United States. The visa permits workers to be in the US for three years initially, although it can be extended to six.About 85,000 individuals are awarded H-1B visas every year based on a lottery system, with Indians accounting for about three-quarters of the recipients.

The development comes amid concerns that the unprecedented fee could severely impact high-skilled professionals in the US technology and medical industry.

As the US decision to impose a $100,000 fee on high-skilled visa applications takes effect, reports suggest that the new rule announced by President Donald Trump may not apply to all stakeholders. Doctors may be exempted from the new H-1B visa fee hike, which has rattled the tech companies and workers in the country. The move has sparked fears among Indians, who are recipients of about three-quarters of visa applications in the US every year. According to Bloomberg, White House has said that the new $100,000 annual fee for H-1B visas will have “case-by-case exemptions if in the national interest.” “The Proclamation allows for potential exemptions, which can include physicians and medical residents,” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Bloomberg in a statement via email. The development comes amid concerns that the unprecedented fee could severely impact high-skilled professionals in the US technology and medical industry. After Trump announced imposing a $100,000 fee on the H-1B visas, the move was criticised by tech entrepreneurs in the US, including billionaire Elon Musk, who warned that the US does not have enough talent in the country to fill vacancies for important jobs in the tech sector. Major tech firms rely on Indian workers for such jobs. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs said that the full implications of the US decision were being studied, warning of humanitarian consequences. “This measure is likely to have humanitarian consequences by way of the disruption caused to families. Government hopes that these disruptions can be addressed suitably by the US authorities,” the MEA said in a statement. The H-1B visas allow companies to sponsor workers from abroad with specialised skills, including scientists, engineers, and computer programmers, to work in the United States. The visa permits workers to be in the US for three years initially, although it can be extended to six. About 85,000 individuals are awarded H-1B visas every year based on a lottery system, with Indians accounting for about three-quarters of the recipients.

The development comes amid concerns that the unprecedented fee could severely impact high-skilled professionals in the US technology and medical industry.

Will doctors not pay $100,000 fee on H-1B visas? Report claims ‘case-by-case exemptions’

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

WION explains New Zealand's suitcase murders: Gory details of the chilling case of a mother, her children, and a dark secret

Donald Trump’s dangerous dance: Destabilising democracy to stay in power

Shashi Tharoor says Navarro’s insults have damaged Washington's ties with Delhi

China preps to evacuate 400,000 as super typhoon makes landfall in Philippines

Pak PM Shehbaz Sharif wants to discuss terrorism with India

H1-B visa fee hike: India can sue the US at the WTO in a world-first. Will it?

Trump says 'they pump babies like horses,' asks parents to go anti-vax until...

What is tylenol? FDA issues letter to physicians drug after Trump's warning

US lawmakers push for Boeing’s return to China market amid high-stakes talks

What makes the F-47 the costliest fighter jet yet? How fast will it be?

Who is Inderjit Singh Gosal? Key Khalistani figure, arrested in Canada

Kamala Harris offers endorsement for Zohran Mamdani for NYC Mayor

Sabotage? World leaders face microphone failures while raising Gaza issue at UN

Mass funeral in Pakistan after military bombs Khyber Pakhtunkhwa village killing 30

Mother of two found guilty in New Zealand’s chilling ‘suitcase murders’ case

Spain's Sanchez demands UN membership for Palestine, slams ‘barbarism’ in Gaza

Trump signs order branding 'anarchist’ Antifa a terrorist organisation

Trump tells pregnant women to ‘tough it out,’ insists Tylenol causes autism

‘Surrender weapons’, Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas tells Hamas

France recognises Palestinian state ahead of the UN General Assembly meeting

US likely to hit entire International Criminal Court with sanctions soon: Report

‘If another missile enters our airspace...’: NATO nations in UN warn Russia

Nvidia announces investment of up to $100 bn in OpenAI data centers

Trump to slam ‘globalist institutions, decaying world order’ in UN speech

IAEA says efforts to resolve issue on Iran's nuclear at a 'difficult juncture'

Will doctors not pay $100,000 fee on H-1B visas? Report claims ‘exemptions’