Macron’s awkward embrace with Iceland PM Kristrún Frostadóttir goes viral – What happened?

Aliens near US military base? Woman captures bizarre jellyfish-like UFO in Alaska | WATCH

'Miracle on the Mississippi': Cruise boat capsizes after colliding with tanker in New Orleans, all 180 passengers aboard safe

Why are modern GPUs so expensive? 7 things that drive graphics card prices

Why do graphics cards have thousands of small processing cores?

CPU vs GPU vs NPU: Which processor does your computer actually need?

'Forbidden' light proposed 40 years ago detected for first time in the universe

Avril Lavigne welcomes first child, keeps baby's name and partner's identity private

Why did the FAA suddenly ground flights across the US? Officials reveal what went wrong

Reply 1988 star Ko Kyung Pyo under police investigation after drunk-driving collision in Seoul

Shape-shifting UFO sighting in Oregon leaves mother-daughter sick: 'Fell like a dead bird'

Vaaste singer Dhvani Bhanushali announces engagement to esports entrepreneur Yash Bhanushali; see pics

From chipmakers to cloud giants: How is Nvidia's stock crash shaking the AI industry?

Crystal-clear Ganga water in Haridwar? Viral video creates buzz online | WATCH

India backs death penalty at UN, says can't equate it with torture

'I don’t negotiate with terrorists'- US school district faces lawsuit over teacher's remark to student

Move over Ram and Ravan, Kunal Kapoor's Lord Indra in Ramayana is stealing hearts in Thailand

Eisenkot accuses Netanyahu of fuelling ‘racist’ campaign against Arab Israelis

Sheikh Hasina's return to Bangladesh: India seeks two assurances from Dhaka, says report

Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky's Australian home targeted by burglars;  3 cars stolen

Ukraine's NATO membership in exchange for ceding territory to Russia: Zelensky reveals US proposal

'Don't hike rates': US Treasury Secretary Bessent warns Fed against rate increase amid Iran war

Trump, Putin and Xi to hold historic trilateral meeting at APEC Summit in China

Jensen Huang seen with wife Lori in Paris in photos shared by daughter Madison

A$AP Rocky's New York event disrupted by on-camera brawl, NYPD steps in

'No civic sense': Viral video shows family bursting crackers inside highway tunnel, sparks outrage | Watch

CM Suvendhu Adhikari turns Bengal's Chhath ghats into launchpad for UP campaign

Video captures horrifying moment Brooklyn apartment building collapses, killing eight people

Colombia 'false positives' scandal: 5 retired army men sentenced over killing of 35 civilians

Telugu actor Giribabu dies at 83; Chiranjeevi, Chandrababu Naidu pay tribute

'It exploded in his mouth': Man dies after friend gives him bomb disguised as rasgulla on Diwali in Madhya Pradesh's Dindori

'He promised me a green card': Lebanese woman accuses Texas ICE officer of sexually assaulting her in detention

Why do powerful graphics cards need so much electricity?

Indian student sentenced to 30 years in UK for online grooming of over 70 children

A federal judge in California on Tuesday (June 24) has barred the Trump administration from making arrests at immigration courts across the United States. The ruling came after federal agents increasingly began detaining migrants outside immigration courts following their asylum hearings after President Donald Trump returned to office. The practice placed many migrants in a difficult position, as failing to appear for immigration hearings can, in certain cases, be considered an offence and may increase the risk of deportation. As a result, many felt compelled to attend court despite the possibility of being arrested.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/germany-cancels-six-f126-frigates-after-delays-plans-shift-to-smaller-warships-1782292012007">Germany cancels six F126 frigates after delays, plans shift to smaller warships</a> US District Judge P. Casey Pitts found that the policy breached the Administrative Procedure Act, describing it as “arbitrary and capricious.” He said both ICE and the Executive Office for Immigration Review had not offered adequate justification for the policy and noted that the presence of enforcement agents at courthouses created a “chilling effect” on migrants seeking legal relief. Meanwhile, James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime. "A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda," he said on his social media platform X. Trump has pushed the boundaries of executive authority in his efforts to tighten immigration enforcement against undocumented migrants, arguing that the United States is facing an influx of criminals and other individuals he considers undesirable.

James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime.

A federal judge in California on Tuesday (June 24) has barred the Trump administration from making arrests at immigration courts across the United States. The ruling came after federal agents increasingly began detaining migrants outside immigration courts following their asylum hearings after President Donald Trump returned to office. The practice placed many migrants in a difficult position, as failing to appear for immigration hearings can, in certain cases, be considered an offence and may increase the risk of deportation. As a result, many felt compelled to attend court despite the possibility of being arrested. Also read: Germany cancels six F126 frigates after delays, plans shift to smaller warships US District Judge P. Casey Pitts found that the policy breached the Administrative Procedure Act, describing it as “arbitrary and capricious.” He said both ICE and the Executive Office for Immigration Review had not offered adequate justification for the policy and noted that the presence of enforcement agents at courthouses created a “chilling effect” on migrants seeking legal relief. Meanwhile, James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime. "A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda," he said on his social media platform X. Trump has pushed the boundaries of executive authority in his efforts to tighten immigration enforcement against undocumented migrants, arguing that the United States is facing an influx of criminals and other individuals he considers undesirable.

James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime.

US Federal court bars Trump administration from detaining migrants at immigration hearings

Amid the talks in Switzerland, Iran is likely to receive at least $300 billion in post-war reconstruction and economic development funding under the preliminary memorandum of understanding (MoU) reached with America. But despite the headline figure, key questions remain over where the money will come from and who will ultimately finance the ambitious plan. US officials have repeatedly stressed that American taxpayers will not bear the cost of rebuilding Iran. Instead, the financing mechanism is expected to be negotiated during a 60-day implementation period outlined in the agreement.&nbsp;Before the agreement was signed, US President Donald Trump rejected reports suggesting Washington would provide Iran with $300 billion, describing such claims as "fake news". His remarks came amid speculation that the US was preparing a major financial package for Tehran as part of efforts to stabilise the region after the conflict.<h2>What does the MoU say?</h2>According to the MoU, the US is expected to play a facilitating role rather than a financial one. Washington has committed to working with regional partners to develop the reconstruction programme and to provide the licences, sanctions waivers and regulatory permissions necessary for international financial transactions linked to the plan.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/south-korea-kospi-black-tuesday-crash-ai-rally-fears-1782293032201">South Korea's 'Black Tuesday'- Why KOSPI suffered its worst-ever points decline</a>&nbsp;Private investors are also expected to play a significant role. If sanctions relief and regulatory approvals are secured, international companies and investment funds could be encouraged to participate in sectors ranging from energy and transport to housing and industrial development.Speaking to NPR, Sullivan said Tehran expected the $300 billion to be sourced from outside parties, while the United States would help create the conditions necessary to attract and secure those investments.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zohran-mamdani-backed-candidates-defeat-establishment-democrats-primaries-1782286731898">Zohran Mamdani-backed candidates sweep establishment Democrats in key primaries</a>&nbsp;The exact structure of the funding package remains unclear. Negotiators are expected to spend the coming weeks determining how much capital can realistically be raised, which countries or institutions may contribute, and what safeguards will govern the flow of funds.

Under a preliminary MoU, Iran is slated for a $300 billion reconstruction fund. The US will facilitate regulatory and sanctions relief, but international private investors and regional partners will finance it.

Amid the talks in Switzerland, Iran is likely to receive at least $300 billion in post-war reconstruction and economic development funding under the preliminary memorandum of understanding (MoU) reached with America. But despite the headline figure, key questions remain over where the money will come from and who will ultimately finance the ambitious plan. US officials have repeatedly stressed that American taxpayers will not bear the cost of rebuilding Iran. Instead, the financing mechanism is expected to be negotiated during a 60-day implementation period outlined in the agreement. Before the agreement was signed, US President Donald Trump rejected reports suggesting Washington would provide Iran with $300 billion, describing such claims as "fake news". His remarks came amid speculation that the US was preparing a major financial package for Tehran as part of efforts to stabilise the region after the conflict. What does the MoU say? According to the MoU, the US is expected to play a facilitating role rather than a financial one. Washington has committed to working with regional partners to develop the reconstruction programme and to provide the licences, sanctions waivers and regulatory permissions necessary for international financial transactions linked to the plan. Also read: South Korea's 'Black Tuesday'- Why KOSPI suffered its worst-ever points decline Private investors are also expected to play a significant role. If sanctions relief and regulatory approvals are secured, international companies and investment funds could be encouraged to participate in sectors ranging from energy and transport to housing and industrial development. Speaking to NPR, Sullivan said Tehran expected the $300 billion to be sourced from outside parties, while the United States would help create the conditions necessary to attract and secure those investments. Also read: Zohran Mamdani-backed candidates sweep establishment Democrats in key primaries The exact structure of the funding package remains unclear. Negotiators are expected to spend the coming weeks determining how much capital can realistically be raised, which countries or institutions may contribute, and what safeguards will govern the flow of funds.

Under a preliminary MoU, Iran is slated for a $300 billion reconstruction fund. The US will facilitate regulatory and sanctions relief, but international private investors and regional partners will finance it.

Who will pay for Iran’s $300bn reconstruction fund under MoU? This is what we know

South Korea's benchmark KOSPI index fell approximately 9.99 per cent on June 23, as investors executed a major sell-off. This was the fifth-largest single-day percentage decline in history and the largest points shed ever in history at 910.71 pts. The sharp fall also triggered a 20 minute boursed wide trading halt after intraday loss breached the threshold. It was being termed as “Black Tuesday” in South Korea. The sharp sell-off had a ripple effect across nations. Japan's Nikkei closed 3.6 per cent lower, and Softbank tumbled by more than 10 per cent, while other benchmark indexes like the Nasdaq were down by over 2.20 per cent. The CSI 300, &nbsp;Hang Seng, Shanghai, and Taiex also showed a decline. The sharp selloff across Asia and the US triggered concerns about whether it was just a correction or the first crack in the AI rally.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zohran-mamdani-backed-candidates-defeat-establishment-democrats-primaries-1782286731898">Zohran Mamdani-backed candidates sweep establishment Democrats in key primaries</a><h2>From a controversial tax proposal to AI euphoria</h2>The high-flying Kospi fall was driven by Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix, whose shares tumbled by 12.31 and 12.47 per cent respectively. These two account for more than half of the market capitalisation of the index. One section of the market attributes the drop to the controversial tax proposal on the unrealised gains. The drop follows a massive rally in the Asian market, as South Korea and Taiwan overtake the market capitalisation of the Indian stock market. The South Korean ruling Democratic Forum, on June 23, called for comprehensive taxation that would treat unrealised gains on stocks and real estate as taxable income, even before the asset is ever sold. They argued that treating unrealised gain as taxable income will reflect the real-time wealth expansion instead of the arbitrary timing of the sale. It had been the cause of a structural friction, a major double standard, as investors treat those stock market gains as unrealised income to avoid tax, while at the same time they use those unrealised gains as collateral to take out bank loans and secure hard liquidity. They used these loans to buy highly volatile, leveraged single-stock ETFs, doubling down on an already top-heavy market.While another section of the market analysts suggests that the AI rally has gone too fast and too far, without accounting for the uncertainty around the Iran war, it is a classic example of “irrational exuberance”. The market has developed a dangerous immunity to geopolitical headlines. They have started to treat conflict as the new normal, expecting it to be locked in a specific region. They are treating the chipmakers as bulletproof, but ignoring the financial reality of the cyclical nature of the AI infrastructure. This comes despite repeated red flags that the tech giants could not maintain their massive capex spending without seeing any profit. The Kospi recovered on June 24, 3.26 per cent, specifically owing to the massive 90 trillion won ($58.6 billion) share buyback program by Samsung Electronics.&nbsp;&nbsp;

South Korea's KOSPI plunged nearly 10% in its biggest-ever points loss, triggering a trading halt and sparking concerns over AI stock valuations, tax proposals, and global market stability.

South Korea's benchmark KOSPI index fell approximately 9.99 per cent on June 23, as investors executed a major sell-off. This was the fifth-largest single-day percentage decline in history and the largest points shed ever in history at 910.71 pts. The sharp fall also triggered a 20 minute boursed wide trading halt after intraday loss breached the threshold. It was being termed as “Black Tuesday” in South Korea. The sharp sell-off had a ripple effect across nations. Japan's Nikkei closed 3.6 per cent lower, and Softbank tumbled by more than 10 per cent, while other benchmark indexes like the Nasdaq were down by over 2.20 per cent. The CSI 300, Hang Seng, Shanghai, and Taiex also showed a decline. The sharp selloff across Asia and the US triggered concerns about whether it was just a correction or the first crack in the AI rally. Also Read: Zohran Mamdani-backed candidates sweep establishment Democrats in key primaries From a controversial tax proposal to AI euphoria The high-flying Kospi fall was driven by Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix, whose shares tumbled by 12.31 and 12.47 per cent respectively. These two account for more than half of the market capitalisation of the index. One section of the market attributes the drop to the controversial tax proposal on the unrealised gains. The drop follows a massive rally in the Asian market, as South Korea and Taiwan overtake the market capitalisation of the Indian stock market. The South Korean ruling Democratic Forum, on June 23, called for comprehensive taxation that would treat unrealised gains on stocks and real estate as taxable income, even before the asset is ever sold. They argued that treating unrealised gain as taxable income will reflect the real-time wealth expansion instead of the arbitrary timing of the sale. It had been the cause of a structural friction, a major double standard, as investors treat those stock market gains as unrealised income to avoid tax, while at the same time they use those unrealised gains as collateral to take out bank loans and secure hard liquidity. They used these loans to buy highly volatile, leveraged single-stock ETFs, doubling down on an already top-heavy market. While another section of the market analysts suggests that the AI rally has gone too fast and too far, without accounting for the uncertainty around the Iran war, it is a classic example of “irrational exuberance”. The market has developed a dangerous immunity to geopolitical headlines. They have started to treat conflict as the new normal, expecting it to be locked in a specific region. They are treating the chipmakers as bulletproof, but ignoring the financial reality of the cyclical nature of the AI infrastructure. This comes despite repeated red flags that the tech giants could not maintain their massive capex spending without seeing any profit. The Kospi recovered on June 24, 3.26 per cent, specifically owing to the massive 90 trillion won ($58.6 billion) share buyback program by Samsung Electronics.

South Korea's KOSPI plunged nearly 10% in its biggest-ever points loss, triggering a trading halt and sparking concerns over AI stock valuations, tax proposals, and global market stability.

South Korea's 'Black Tuesday'- Why KOSPI suffered its worst-ever points decline

US President Donald Trump once again targeted transgender athletes during a campaign-style speech in Pennsylvania on Tuesday (June 23). He did it despite revealing that the First Lady, Melania Trump, had repeatedly asked him not to make such jokes in public.&nbsp;Speaking at the Mack Trucks Lehigh Valley Operations facility in Macungie, Trump told supporters that his wife had urged him to avoid both dancing on stage and acting out scenarios involving transgender athletes competing in women's sports. Moments later, however, he proceeded to do exactly that.&nbsp;Addressing the crowd, Trump said Melania had told him, "Darling, please, please don't dance. It's not presidential." He added that she had also urged him not to perform his familiar impersonations involving women's sporting events.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/china-claims-supercomputer-crown-what-are-supercomputers-where-india-stands-and-what-it-means-for-the-world-1782291956553">China claims supercomputer crown: What are supercomputers, where India stands and what it means for the world</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨 LMAO! President Trump said First Lady Melania told him not to do the transgender in women&#39;s sports reenactment on stage, then he proceeds to immediately do it There is nobody else like 47 😭😂 <a href="https://t.co/TqdYxwjjJe">pic.twitter.com/TqdYxwjjJe</a>&mdash; Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) <a href="https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2069500993184637318?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

According to Trump, the First Lady had specifically asked him not to recreate his often-used examples involving weightlifting and swimming competitions. "Please, please, the men and women's sports, please don't do the weightlifting thing. And don't do the swimming thing," he recalled her saying.&nbsp;Despite recounting that advice, Trump launched into a lengthy and animated story about a female weightlifter attempting to break a long-standing record. Acting out parts of the scene, he described the athlete struggling with the weight before introducing a fictional transgender competitor who, in his telling, easily surpassed the achievement.&nbsp;The remarks drew laughter from sections of the audience and formed part of Trump's broader criticism of transgender women participating in women's sports, an issue he has frequently raised at rallies and public appearances.&nbsp;Also readTrump has made opposition to transgender participation in women's sports a recurring theme of his political messaging. Supporters argue the issue concerns fairness in competition, while LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and transgender rights campaigners have slammed such rhetoric, saying it unfairly targets a vulnerable minority and misrepresents the realities of transgender participation in sport.

At a Pennsylvania speech, Donald Trump mocked transgender women in sports, acting out weightlifting scenarios despite revealing that First Lady Melania Trump had explicitly asked him not to.

US President Donald Trump once again targeted transgender athletes during a campaign-style speech in Pennsylvania on Tuesday (June 23). He did it despite revealing that the First Lady, Melania Trump, had repeatedly asked him not to make such jokes in public. Speaking at the Mack Trucks Lehigh Valley Operations facility in Macungie, Trump told supporters that his wife had urged him to avoid both dancing on stage and acting out scenarios involving transgender athletes competing in women's sports. Moments later, however, he proceeded to do exactly that. Addressing the crowd, Trump said Melania had told him, "Darling, please, please don't dance. It's not presidential." He added that she had also urged him not to perform his familiar impersonations involving women's sporting events. Also read:China claims supercomputer crown: What are supercomputers, where India stands and what it means for the world

At a Pennsylvania speech, Donald Trump mocked transgender women in sports, acting out weightlifting scenarios despite revealing that First Lady Melania Trump had explicitly asked him not to.

WATCH: Trump mocks transgender athletes, again, despite saying Melania urged him not to

China has reportedly reclaimed the top spot in global supercomputer rankings, intensifying its tech race with the US. These machines pare becoming a key marker of national strength and strategic power for the world to see now.

China has reportedly reclaimed the top spot in global supercomputer rankings, intensifying its tech race with the US. These machines pare becoming a key marker of national strength and strategic power for the world to see now.

China claims supercomputer crown: What are supercomputers, where India stands and what it means for the world

Germany scrapped the order for six F126 frigates on Wednesday (June 24) after the order was delayed, according to the defence ministry. The report also indicated that the country intends to ​buy eight smaller MEKO A-200 frigates instead of ‌rival ⁠warship builder TKMS. Rheinmetall, a leading international systems supplier in the defence industry, was ​expected ⁠to finalise an agreement in the second quarter to take over the F126 frigate programme ​from Dutch shipbuilder Damen, CEO Armin Papperger said last month. The F126 frigates are designed to engage threats above ​and underwater.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/elon-musk-s-spacex-sells-25-bn-in-bond-to-ease-x-and-xai-debt-burden-1782288849891">Elon Musk's SpaceX sells $25 bn in bond to ease X and xAI debt burden</a><h3>What do we know about F126 frigates?</h3>The F126, also known as the Niedersachsen-class frigate (Fregatte 126), a planned German frigate class intended to replace the F123 Brandenburg-class frigates in the German Navy. These vessels are set to become the largest surface combat ships introduced into the German Navy since World War II. The lead ship, Niedersachsen, was initially scheduled to enter service in 2028, followed by Saarland, Bremen and Thüringen. However, delivery timelines have since been pushed back, with the first vessel now expected in 2032. Germany expanded the program on 8 April 2024 by exercising an option to acquire an additional two frigates. A contract for these additional F126 frigates was signed on 19 June 2024. Before 1 January 2021, the project was known as MKS 180 or Multi-Purpose Combat Ship 180 (Mehrzweckkampfschiff 180), with 180 indicating the class’s planned complement. A key feature of the F126 class is its modular design. The ships can be equipped with interchangeable mission modules containing specialised equipment, sensors, weapons and operational spaces tailored to specific tasks. These modules can be maintained independently of the vessel and transferred between ships in the class, providing greater operational flexibility.&nbsp;&nbsp;

These vessels are set to become the largest surface combat ships introduced into the German Navy since World War II. The lead ship, Niedersachsen, was initially scheduled to enter service in 2028, followed by Saarland, Bremen and Thüringen.

Germany scrapped the order for six F126 frigates on Wednesday (June 24) after the order was delayed, according to the defence ministry. The report also indicated that the country intends to buy eight smaller MEKO A-200 frigates instead of ‌rival ⁠warship builder TKMS. Rheinmetall, a leading international systems supplier in the defence industry, was expected ⁠to finalise an agreement in the second quarter to take over the F126 frigate programme from Dutch shipbuilder Damen, CEO Armin Papperger said last month. The F126 frigates are designed to engage threats above and underwater. Also read: Elon Musk's SpaceX sells $25 bn in bond to ease X and xAI debt burden What do we know about F126 frigates? The F126, also known as the Niedersachsen-class frigate (Fregatte 126), a planned German frigate class intended to replace the F123 Brandenburg-class frigates in the German Navy. These vessels are set to become the largest surface combat ships introduced into the German Navy since World War II. The lead ship, Niedersachsen, was initially scheduled to enter service in 2028, followed by Saarland, Bremen and Thüringen. However, delivery timelines have since been pushed back, with the first vessel now expected in 2032. Germany expanded the program on 8 April 2024 by exercising an option to acquire an additional two frigates. A contract for these additional F126 frigates was signed on 19 June 2024. Before 1 January 2021, the project was known as MKS 180 or Multi-Purpose Combat Ship 180 (Mehrzweckkampfschiff 180), with 180 indicating the class’s planned complement. A key feature of the F126 class is its modular design. The ships can be equipped with interchangeable mission modules containing specialised equipment, sensors, weapons and operational spaces tailored to specific tasks. These modules can be maintained independently of the vessel and transferred between ships in the class, providing greater operational flexibility.

These vessels are set to become the largest surface combat ships introduced into the German Navy since World War II. The lead ship, Niedersachsen, was initially scheduled to enter service in 2028, followed by Saarland, Bremen and Thüringen.

Germany cancels six F126 frigates after delays, plans shift to smaller warships

Iran on Wednesday (June 24) said the deal between Iran and the United States to end the West Asia war is "America's declaration of defeat". &nbsp;"The Islamabad understanding was not the result of pressure and coercion, but rather the result of the resistance and authority of the brave Iranian nation," Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the head of the Iranian negotiating team, said at a conference in Azerbaijan broadcast on Iranian television.&nbsp;"That is why the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding became a declaration of America's defeat," he said, and added that the countries of the region must ensure security in the Middle East. Later, he also said that nations in the region should determine the Middle East’s political and security order, emphasising expanded intra-regional cooperation.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-will-pay-for-iran-s-300bn-reconstruction-fund-under-mou-this-is-what-we-know-1782299801226">Who will pay for Iran’s $300bn reconstruction fund under MoU? This is what we know</a><h3>Israel-Lebanon 'pilot' initiative</h3>In another development, negotiations between Israel and Lebanon are reportedly centred on a US-backed proposal under which Israeli forces would transfer control of parts of the territory captured during the conflict with Hezbollah to the Lebanese army, according to officials from both countries. The proposed "pilot" initiative is currently being examined as part of the latest round of discussions between the two sides. Meanwhile, Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities are expected to be inspected by officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), according to the agency's chief, Rafael Mariano Grossi, speaking in Tokyo on Wednesday. His remarks come amid disagreements between Iran and the United States over whether enrichment sites damaged in recent strikes would be subject to inspections. The inspections are considered crucial to the agreement, which requires Iran to dilute its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to lower enrichment levels.&nbsp;International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Mariano Grossi's remark was the firmest yet from the United Nations agency, which is considered significant in determining the status of Iran's nuclear stockpile. &nbsp;

Iran on Wednesday described the agreement with the US to end the West Asia conflict as a "declaration of America's defeat". Iranian official Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the deal reflected Iran's resilience and urged regional nations to take responsibility for Middle East security.

Iran on Wednesday (June 24) said the deal between Iran and the United States to end the West Asia war is "America's declaration of defeat". "The Islamabad understanding was not the result of pressure and coercion, but rather the result of the resistance and authority of the brave Iranian nation," Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the head of the Iranian negotiating team, said at a conference in Azerbaijan broadcast on Iranian television. "That is why the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding became a declaration of America's defeat," he said, and added that the countries of the region must ensure security in the Middle East. Later, he also said that nations in the region should determine the Middle East’s political and security order, emphasising expanded intra-regional cooperation. Also read: Who will pay for Iran’s $300bn reconstruction fund under MoU? This is what we know Israel-Lebanon 'pilot' initiative In another development, negotiations between Israel and Lebanon are reportedly centred on a US-backed proposal under which Israeli forces would transfer control of parts of the territory captured during the conflict with Hezbollah to the Lebanese army, according to officials from both countries. The proposed "pilot" initiative is currently being examined as part of the latest round of discussions between the two sides. Meanwhile, Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities are expected to be inspected by officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), according to the agency's chief, Rafael Mariano Grossi, speaking in Tokyo on Wednesday. His remarks come amid disagreements between Iran and the United States over whether enrichment sites damaged in recent strikes would be subject to inspections. The inspections are considered crucial to the agreement, which requires Iran to dilute its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to lower enrichment levels. International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Mariano Grossi's remark was the firmest yet from the United Nations agency, which is considered significant in determining the status of Iran's nuclear stockpile.

Iran on Wednesday described the agreement with the US to end the West Asia conflict as a "declaration of America's defeat". Iranian official Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the deal reflected Iran's resilience and urged regional nations to take responsibility for Middle East security.

Iran calls agreement with US to end West Asia conflict 'declaration of America's defeat'

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani backed candidates sweeping the Democrats' primary in an election with the primary agenda of the US relationship with Israel, dealing a major blow to the establishment Democrats. Two sitting US representatives were defeated in their deep blue districts. Darializa Avila Chevalier toppled five-term incumbent Adriano Espaillat in NY-13, and former city comptroller Brad Lander routed two-term incumbent Dan Goldman in NY-10; both of them were backed by the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC. In NY-7, state Assemblywoman Claire Valdez defeated Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso. On the other hand, Trump-backed state Attorney General Alan Wilson also scored a win in the &nbsp;South Carolina gubernatorial primary, preserving his good primary record, except for the gubernatorial candidates in&nbsp;Iowa&nbsp;and&nbsp;Georgia, Randy Feenstra and Burt Jones, respectively, who lost their primaries.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/nirav-modi-ordered-pay-100-crore-bank-of-india-uk-court-extradition-1782282619327">Nirav Modi ordered to pay ₹100 crore to Bank of India as UK court rules against fugitive businessman</a><h2>A resurgence of left politics in the Democrats</h2>From New York to Seattle, DC, more cities are picking Democratic Socialist leaders. In November 2025, Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani won the New York City mayoral election, and Katie Wilson, an unknown “organiser”, became Seattle's mayor. Earlier this month, Nithya Raman advanced to the Los Angeles mayoral race, and Janeese Lewis George, a far-left Democratic Socialist, advanced to the Washington, DC mayoral election. Now, Mamdani-backed Democratic candidates toppled the traditional establishment democrats. Mamdani, previously, while endorsing candidates in the primary, ripped the Democratic establishment for being stuck in an old way of thinking.&nbsp;“Frankly, it will lose in South Carolina and New Hampshire,” he said, referencing traditional early presidential primary states. “It will fall short of 270 electoral votes, because the party of the past will not be what leads us into the future.”This is a direct headache for the traditional Democrat Liberals like Kathy Hochul and Hakeem Jeffries, whose endorsed candidates lost the primaries. The primary served as a direct battle for the billionaire and Israeli donors, against the anti-billionaires and anti-Israeli camp, as the Democrat party is increasingly getting polarised into two camps.&nbsp;

Candidates backed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani scored major victories in Democratic primaries, defeating establishment figures and highlighting the growing influence of the Democratic Socialist movement.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani backed candidates sweeping the Democrats' primary in an election with the primary agenda of the US relationship with Israel, dealing a major blow to the establishment Democrats. Two sitting US representatives were defeated in their deep blue districts. Darializa Avila Chevalier toppled five-term incumbent Adriano Espaillat in NY-13, and former city comptroller Brad Lander routed two-term incumbent Dan Goldman in NY-10; both of them were backed by the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC. In NY-7, state Assemblywoman Claire Valdez defeated Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso. On the other hand, Trump-backed state Attorney General Alan Wilson also scored a win in the South Carolina gubernatorial primary, preserving his good primary record, except for the gubernatorial candidates in Iowa and Georgia, Randy Feenstra and Burt Jones, respectively, who lost their primaries. Also Read: Nirav Modi ordered to pay ₹100 crore to Bank of India as UK court rules against fugitive businessman A resurgence of left politics in the Democrats From New York to Seattle, DC, more cities are picking Democratic Socialist leaders. In November 2025, Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani won the New York City mayoral election, and Katie Wilson, an unknown “organiser”, became Seattle's mayor. Earlier this month, Nithya Raman advanced to the Los Angeles mayoral race, and Janeese Lewis George, a far-left Democratic Socialist, advanced to the Washington, DC mayoral election. Now, Mamdani-backed Democratic candidates toppled the traditional establishment democrats. Mamdani, previously, while endorsing candidates in the primary, ripped the Democratic establishment for being stuck in an old way of thinking. “Frankly, it will lose in South Carolina and New Hampshire,” he said, referencing traditional early presidential primary states. “It will fall short of 270 electoral votes, because the party of the past will not be what leads us into the future.” This is a direct headache for the traditional Democrat Liberals like Kathy Hochul and Hakeem Jeffries, whose endorsed candidates lost the primaries. The primary served as a direct battle for the billionaire and Israeli donors, against the anti-billionaires and anti-Israeli camp, as the Democrat party is increasingly getting polarised into two camps.

Candidates backed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani scored major victories in Democratic primaries, defeating establishment figures and highlighting the growing influence of the Democratic Socialist movement.

Zohran Mamdani-backed candidates sweep establishment Democrats in key primaries

SpaceX sold $25 billion of investment-grade bonds on Tuesday to cut the interest burden that had helped finance Elon Musk's 2022 acquisition of X (then known as Twitter), along with the expensive loans and bonds issued by artificial intelligence (AI) lab xAI last year. Had these businesses remained separate, they would have paid an estimated $1.8 billion this year to service a combined debt burden of $17.5 billion. Following their integration into SpaceX, the company is expected to incur around $1.5 billion in annual interest payments on its first-ever $25 billion bond offering. Prior to SpaceX's landmark $75 billion IPO earlier this month, Elon Musk consolidated several of his ventures into a single conglomerate, a move that drew strong investor enthusiasm despite the group not yet being profitable. Musk has effectively used revenue after selling Starlink's satellite internet service and SpaceX's rocket contracts with the US government to assist large spending at xAI, which holds X. "To invest in this, you've essentially got to be a believer," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth. "You have to believe revenues are going to ramp significantly over the coming years." Investors have shown confidence in the demand for SpaceX's debt offering, which received up to $89 billion in orders. The strong appetite prompted the firm to secure lower borrowing costs during the sale process. The demand persisted even as SpaceX shares experienced volatility, losing roughly 25 per cent of their value over three trading sessions before recovering slightly on Tuesday. However, a SpaceX spokesperson didn't quickly respond to the ongoing development.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/heavy-hitter-how-many-missiles-can-a-b-52-bomber-carry-at-once-1782285270342">Heavy hitter: How many missiles can a B-52 bomber carry at once?</a><h3>Competition with AI firms</h3>Securing accessibility of the investment-grade bond market was a significant move in funding xAI's efforts to compete with the AI firms such as Anthropic PBC and OpenAI. Previously, the company's higher-risk credit profile limited it to sell leveraged loans and high-yield or junk bonds, where debt is pricey. However, after SpaceX acquired xAI in February, winning investment-grade ratings from top credit graders, the company has unlocked access to the cheaper US high-grade bond market, providing SpaceX access to deeper pockets. "They are going to need more debt to fund their expansion," said Robert Schiffman, a senior credit analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. "If you're going to have a balance sheet with $80 to $100 billion plus of debt, you can't finance that in the junk market." The global push to build data centres and supporting infrastructure for the artificial intelligence boom is projected to require trillions of dollars in investment. To fund their AI expansion plans, highly profitable companies such as Nvidia and Amazon.com have increasingly tapped the corporate bond market, a trend expected to accelerate in the years ahead. In recent weeks, SpaceX, through xAI, has secured several multi-billion-dollar computing agreements with Anthropic, Google and AI startup Reflection, strengthening its AI-related revenue stream. However, according to public filings, xAI reported revenue of $3.2 billion last year while posting an operating loss of $6.4 billion. The company's annual losses have grown sharply from approximately $1.6 billion recorded in 2024.

The strong appetite prompted the firm to secure lower borrowing costs during the sale process. The demand persisted even as SpaceX shares experienced volatility, losing roughly 25 per cent of their value over three trading sessions before recovering slightly on Tuesday.

SpaceX sold $25 billion of investment-grade bonds on Tuesday to cut the interest burden that had helped finance Elon Musk's 2022 acquisition of X (then known as Twitter), along with the expensive loans and bonds issued by artificial intelligence (AI) lab xAI last year. Had these businesses remained separate, they would have paid an estimated $1.8 billion this year to service a combined debt burden of $17.5 billion. Following their integration into SpaceX, the company is expected to incur around $1.5 billion in annual interest payments on its first-ever $25 billion bond offering. Prior to SpaceX's landmark $75 billion IPO earlier this month, Elon Musk consolidated several of his ventures into a single conglomerate, a move that drew strong investor enthusiasm despite the group not yet being profitable. Musk has effectively used revenue after selling Starlink's satellite internet service and SpaceX's rocket contracts with the US government to assist large spending at xAI, which holds X. "To invest in this, you've essentially got to be a believer," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth. "You have to believe revenues are going to ramp significantly over the coming years." Investors have shown confidence in the demand for SpaceX's debt offering, which received up to $89 billion in orders. The strong appetite prompted the firm to secure lower borrowing costs during the sale process. The demand persisted even as SpaceX shares experienced volatility, losing roughly 25 per cent of their value over three trading sessions before recovering slightly on Tuesday. However, a SpaceX spokesperson didn't quickly respond to the ongoing development. Also read: Heavy hitter: How many missiles can a B-52 bomber carry at once? Competition with AI firms Securing accessibility of the investment-grade bond market was a significant move in funding xAI's efforts to compete with the AI firms such as Anthropic PBC and OpenAI. Previously, the company's higher-risk credit profile limited it to sell leveraged loans and high-yield or junk bonds, where debt is pricey. However, after SpaceX acquired xAI in February, winning investment-grade ratings from top credit graders, the company has unlocked access to the cheaper US high-grade bond market, providing SpaceX access to deeper pockets. "They are going to need more debt to fund their expansion," said Robert Schiffman, a senior credit analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. "If you're going to have a balance sheet with $80 to $100 billion plus of debt, you can't finance that in the junk market." The global push to build data centres and supporting infrastructure for the artificial intelligence boom is projected to require trillions of dollars in investment. To fund their AI expansion plans, highly profitable companies such as Nvidia and Amazon.com have increasingly tapped the corporate bond market, a trend expected to accelerate in the years ahead. In recent weeks, SpaceX, through xAI, has secured several multi-billion-dollar computing agreements with Anthropic, Google and AI startup Reflection, strengthening its AI-related revenue stream. However, according to public filings, xAI reported revenue of $3.2 billion last year while posting an operating loss of $6.4 billion. The company's annual losses have grown sharply from approximately $1.6 billion recorded in 2024.

The strong appetite prompted the firm to secure lower borrowing costs during the sale process. The demand persisted even as SpaceX shares experienced volatility, losing roughly 25 per cent of their value over three trading sessions before recovering slightly on Tuesday.

Elon Musk's SpaceX sells $25 bn in bond to ease X and xAI debt burden

China's secretive Shenlong space plane has once again sparked intrigue among space watchers after reportedly releasing an unidentified object while orbiting Earth. According to commercial space tracking firm LeoLabs, the object was detected on June 22 near Shenlong, which has been in orbit since launching on its fourth mission in February this year.<h2>What did China release in space?</h2>"At 02:30 UTC on 22 June 2026, LeoLabs detected an unknown object in the vicinity of the Chinese Shenlong reusable space plane," LeoLabs said in a post on X. After tracking the object across its global radar network, LeoLabs said it had “assessed with high confidence that it was released from the Chinese spaceplane."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">At 02:30 UTC on 22 June 2026, LeoLabs detected an unknown object in the vicinity of the Chinese Shenlong reusable spaceplane. This object did not correlate to any other object in our catalog. It was first observed by our Tracker radar in New Zealand. <a href="https://t.co/AEf4gbyJPr">pic.twitter.com/AEf4gbyJPr</a>&mdash; LeoLabs (@LeoLabs_Space) <a href="https://x.com/LeoLabs_Space/status/2069091413795414445?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/did-cia-destroy-an-alien-message-newly-released-ufo-files-reveal-bizarre-1958-mystery-1781337303228">'Message from space': Did CIA destroy an alien message? Newly released UFO files reveal bizarre 1958 mystery</a>The newly detected object has since been catalogued by the US Space Force, according to astrophysicist and satellite tracker Jonathan McDowell.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">USSF has cataloged a new object (69673) released from the Chinese spaceplane CSSHQ4 (2026-024A) which has been in orbit since Feb 7. Previous missions of the spaceplane have also released such objects, which may be small subsatellites such as cubesats&mdash; Jonathan McDowell (@planet4589) <a href="https://x.com/planet4589/status/2069412042126098666?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What is Shenlong?</h2>Shenlong, which translates to "Divine Dragon", is China's reusable space plane programme. Much like the US military's X-37B space plane, Shenlong launches atop a rocket but is designed to return and land on a runway like a conventional aircraft.China has released very little information about the vehicle, and most details about it have emerged through satellite tracking and telescope observations conducted by independent researchers.The space plane was launched on February 6 aboard a Long March 2F rocket from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in the Gobi Desert. Beijing did not disclose the mission's objectives.<h2>Not China's first mysterious deployment</h2>According to Space, this is not the first time Shenlong has attracted attention for unusual activity in orbit.In 2024, observers reported that the spacecraft may have deployed a small subsatellite or ejected an unnecessary piece of hardware before returning to Earth. Earlier missions also generated speculation after multiple objects appeared near the spacecraft, though some were later identified as launch-related debris.Astronomers have additionally reported signs that Shenlong may deploy solar arrays while in orbit, suggesting it can remain operational for extended periods.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/scientists-discover-world-s-largest-whale-graveyard-hidden-7km-beneath-the-indian-ocean-1781170611094">Scientists discover world's largest 'whale graveyard' hidden 7km beneath the Indian Ocean</a><h2>Why are experts watching closely?</h2>According to SpaceNews, one possibility is that China is testing rendezvous and proximity operations (RPO), a capability that allows spacecraft to manoeuvre close to other satellites.Wile such technology has legitimate civilian uses, including satellite inspection, servicing and refuelling, it also has military applications including tamper with adversary satellites in orbit.China is not alone in developing such technologies. Russia has conducted similar manoeuvres with so-called inspector satellites, while the United States is also believed to be pursuing advanced orbital servicing and proximity-operation capabilities.&nbsp;

China's secretive Shenlong space plane has reportedly released an unidentified object while orbiting Earth, reigniting speculation about the true purpose of the reusable spacecraft. What mystery object did China release in space?

China's secretive Shenlong space plane has once again sparked intrigue among space watchers after reportedly releasing an unidentified object while orbiting Earth. According to commercial space tracking firm LeoLabs, the object was detected on June 22 near Shenlong, which has been in orbit since launching on its fourth mission in February this year. What did China release in space? "At 02:30 UTC on 22 June 2026, LeoLabs detected an unknown object in the vicinity of the Chinese Shenlong reusable space plane," LeoLabs said in a post on X. After tracking the object across its global radar network, LeoLabs said it had “assessed with high confidence that it was released from the Chinese spaceplane."

China's secretive Shenlong space plane has reportedly released an unidentified object while orbiting Earth, reigniting speculation about the true purpose of the reusable spacecraft. What mystery object did China release in space?

China's secretive Shenlong space plane releases mystery object in orbit. What is Beijing up to?

Amid reports of rift between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump, Israel has now said that they need to be free from military dependence on America. Speaking during a meeting with reserve combat officers in the West Bank’s Gush Etzion, Netanyahu opined that it is times to be “free” the United States and develop its own weapons-production capabilities. He explained that the step is crucial to support the ongoing fight with Iran and its proxies. This comes after Iran and the US signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to end the war while keeping Israel completely excluded from the negotiations. The deal demands an "immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon". However, Israel maintains that its campaign to dismantle Hezbollah is an entirely separate security issue and it has continued its action in Lebanon.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-wants-new-pm-for-israel-us-president-calls-netanyahu-wartime-pm-but-does-not-endorse-him-1781056588263">Trump wants new PM for Israel? US president calls Netanyahu 'wartime PM', but does not endorse him</a>&nbsp;"I greatly appreciate the support we have received — and that I have secured over the years — from our American friends. But today I say: We need our own independent weapons-production system. We must manufacture our own armaments. We are now confronting Iran and its proxies. We have struck them hard. It is not over yet, but it depends on our strength. Where we will be in 30 years depends on our strength. That is why what we are doing now is building even greater strength,” the Israeli premier said. He added that he wants Israel “to have an independent armaments capability.” “We need to free ourselves from dependence, continue building more and more strength, incorporate more and more technology, and train more and more generations of commanders like you — because ultimately that is what will determine our position,” Netanyahu added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/un-claims-israel-deliberately-targeted-gaza-children-during-and-after-war-netanyahu-government-rejects-allegation-1782219343229">UN claims Israel deliberately targeted Gaza children during and after war</a><h2>Netanyahu made similar comments earlier</h2>Speaking at the JNS Summit in Jerusalem, Netanyahu seemingly shed light on the tense relation with the US president. “In the United States, they say that President Trump does everything that I ask him to do. And in Israel, they say that I do everything he wants me to do. Well, neither is true.” He emphasized that both the leaders are “independent” and are proud of their countries. "We stand for our interests. I stand for the interests of Israel and for its security,” he added. The Israeli leader acknowledged that while Trump and he have the same view on most issues, they sometimes have disagreements. Despite this, they respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership, he stressed. “Often we see eye to eye. Sometimes we don’t. But we respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership and commitment to our people,” he said.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-caught-between-trump-and-israel-s-red-lines-1781942218652/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-caught-between-trump-and-israel-s-red-lines-1781942218652/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Earlier this month, Trump said he wasn't sure if Netanyahu wants to be reelected again as he stopped short of endorsing him. He called Netanyahu “wartime prime minister” who already had an “amazing career.” In an interview with ABC, Trump said, “I don’t know, he’s had an amazing career. Does he want to continue? Because, you know he’s a wartime prime minister." This came despite Netanyahu, the longest serving PM of Israel, shared a campaign ad from his Likud party on X.&nbsp;Trump and Netanyahu are going through a rough patch. According to reports, Netanyahu was rebuked by Trump after IDF retaliated to Iran strikes without Washington's nod. In an expletive laden call, Trump reportedly told the Israeli PM that he is “fucking crazy” and that everyone “hates Israel.” The Axios report this morning quotes the US president saying: “I said, 'Bibi, you better be careful, or you will be on your own very soon.”&nbsp;

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel must reduce its military dependence on the US and expand domestic weapons production. Citing ongoing threats from Iran and its proxies, he stressed the need for greater self-reliance 

Amid reports of rift between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump, Israel has now said that they need to be free from military dependence on America. Speaking during a meeting with reserve combat officers in the West Bank’s Gush Etzion, Netanyahu opined that it is times to be “free” the United States and develop its own weapons-production capabilities. He explained that the step is crucial to support the ongoing fight with Iran and its proxies. This comes after Iran and the US signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to end the war while keeping Israel completely excluded from the negotiations. The deal demands an "immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon". However, Israel maintains that its campaign to dismantle Hezbollah is an entirely separate security issue and it has continued its action in Lebanon. Also Read: Trump wants new PM for Israel? US president calls Netanyahu 'wartime PM', but does not endorse him "I greatly appreciate the support we have received — and that I have secured over the years — from our American friends. But today I say: We need our own independent weapons-production system. We must manufacture our own armaments. We are now confronting Iran and its proxies. We have struck them hard. It is not over yet, but it depends on our strength. Where we will be in 30 years depends on our strength. That is why what we are doing now is building even greater strength,” the Israeli premier said. He added that he wants Israel “to have an independent armaments capability.” “We need to free ourselves from dependence, continue building more and more strength, incorporate more and more technology, and train more and more generations of commanders like you — because ultimately that is what will determine our position,” Netanyahu added. Also Read: UN claims Israel deliberately targeted Gaza children during and after war Netanyahu made similar comments earlier Speaking at the JNS Summit in Jerusalem, Netanyahu seemingly shed light on the tense relation with the US president. “In the United States, they say that President Trump does everything that I ask him to do. And in Israel, they say that I do everything he wants me to do. Well, neither is true.” He emphasized that both the leaders are “independent” and are proud of their countries. "We stand for our interests. I stand for the interests of Israel and for its security,” he added. The Israeli leader acknowledged that while Trump and he have the same view on most issues, they sometimes have disagreements. Despite this, they respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership, he stressed. “Often we see eye to eye. Sometimes we don’t. But we respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership and commitment to our people,” he said. https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-caught-between-trump-and-israel-s-red-lines-1781942218652/embed Earlier this month, Trump said he wasn't sure if Netanyahu wants to be reelected again as he stopped short of endorsing him. He called Netanyahu “wartime prime minister” who already had an “amazing career.” In an interview with ABC, Trump said, “I don’t know, he’s had an amazing career. Does he want to continue? Because, you know he’s a wartime prime minister." This came despite Netanyahu, the longest serving PM of Israel, shared a campaign ad from his Likud party on X. Trump and Netanyahu are going through a rough patch. According to reports, Netanyahu was rebuked by Trump after IDF retaliated to Iran strikes without Washington's nod. In an expletive laden call, Trump reportedly told the Israeli PM that he is “fucking crazy” and that everyone “hates Israel.” The Axios report this morning quotes the US president saying: “I said, 'Bibi, you better be careful, or you will be on your own very soon.”

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel must reduce its military dependence on the US and expand domestic weapons production. Citing ongoing threats from Iran and its proxies, he stressed the need for greater self-reliance&nbsp;

'We need our own weapons': Crack between Netanyahu-Trump out in open? Israeli PM thanks America for help but...

Famous fugitive economic offender of India, Nirav Modi, was ordered by a court to pay $10.7 million (₹100 crore) to the Bank of India. The London Circuit Commercial Court deemed him personally liable for providing the debt, as he was the personal guarantor, in relation to a loan granted by the Bank of India to his Dubai-based company, Firestar Diamond FZE, in 2012. &nbsp;“Mr Modi is liable under the personal guarantee to the bank for the principal amount due of $4.1 million (approximately ₹38.9 crore). The interest calculated on the basis set out by the bank is to be added. Mr Modi has not provided any defence to explain why the bank was not entitled to that sum,” said Judge Simon Tinkler.<h2>Nirav Modi vs Bank of India</h2>In February 2018, following the ₹13,000 crore fraud case with Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud, Nirav Modi was declared a fugitive in India. He informed the Bank of India in an email that he would be unable to meet its financial obligations due to his frozen operations. In April 2018, the Bank of India terminated the loan arrangement and asked Modi to enforce the personal guarantee.&nbsp;According to the court records, the financial position of the Firestar Group tanked following the PNB fraud. The bank said that no payment was made despite repeated demands. Modi's legal team argued that the personal guarantee could not be enforced because the bank failed to make a valid demand for repayment of the loan, and claimed that there was insufficient demand for repayment. He also argued that he did not receive notice from the bank in April 2018 and October 2025, as he was not present in India. The court rejected those claims, referring to the email sent by Modi, addressing the financial condition of Modi and the Firestar Group, following negative media coverage and stating that he would not be able to meet the liabilities. His legal representative also received a copy of the April 2018 notice in 2019, and the October 2025 notice was served to his HMP Thameside prison, where he was lodged at that moment. The court ruled in favour of the Bank and ordered him to pay $10.7 million.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/shehbaz-sharif-iran-ballistic-missile-program-not-part-of-us-iran-mou-1782278332353">Shehbaz Sharif rejects Rubio's claim, says Iran ballistic missile program not part of US-Iran MoU</a><h2>Why has Nirav Modi not been extradited to India?</h2>Modi has exhausted almost all his legal appeal capacity in India. He was defeated in the plea against extradition in the UK High Court and the Supreme Court. His mental health and risk of suicide appeal was denied, and the court also rejected his claim that Indian prisons do not match the human rights standards. “We have been in touch with the UK side on the extradition request. We understand that legal proceedings in this particular matter are currently underway,” said MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal. He is now pursuing legal remedies before the European Court of Human Rights in an effort to halt his extradition to India.&nbsp;

A London court has ordered fugitive businessman Nirav Modi to pay ₹100 crore to Bank of India over a personal loan guarantee linked to Firestar Diamond FZE. Here's why his extradition to India remains pending

Famous fugitive economic offender of India, Nirav Modi, was ordered by a court to pay $10.7 million (₹100 crore) to the Bank of India. The London Circuit Commercial Court deemed him personally liable for providing the debt, as he was the personal guarantor, in relation to a loan granted by the Bank of India to his Dubai-based company, Firestar Diamond FZE, in 2012. “Mr Modi is liable under the personal guarantee to the bank for the principal amount due of $4.1 million (approximately ₹38.9 crore). The interest calculated on the basis set out by the bank is to be added. Mr Modi has not provided any defence to explain why the bank was not entitled to that sum,” said Judge Simon Tinkler. Nirav Modi vs Bank of India In February 2018, following the ₹13,000 crore fraud case with Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud, Nirav Modi was declared a fugitive in India. He informed the Bank of India in an email that he would be unable to meet its financial obligations due to his frozen operations. In April 2018, the Bank of India terminated the loan arrangement and asked Modi to enforce the personal guarantee. According to the court records, the financial position of the Firestar Group tanked following the PNB fraud. The bank said that no payment was made despite repeated demands. Modi's legal team argued that the personal guarantee could not be enforced because the bank failed to make a valid demand for repayment of the loan, and claimed that there was insufficient demand for repayment. He also argued that he did not receive notice from the bank in April 2018 and October 2025, as he was not present in India. The court rejected those claims, referring to the email sent by Modi, addressing the financial condition of Modi and the Firestar Group, following negative media coverage and stating that he would not be able to meet the liabilities. His legal representative also received a copy of the April 2018 notice in 2019, and the October 2025 notice was served to his HMP Thameside prison, where he was lodged at that moment. The court ruled in favour of the Bank and ordered him to pay $10.7 million. Also Read: Shehbaz Sharif rejects Rubio's claim, says Iran ballistic missile program not part of US-Iran MoU Why has Nirav Modi not been extradited to India? Modi has exhausted almost all his legal appeal capacity in India. He was defeated in the plea against extradition in the UK High Court and the Supreme Court. His mental health and risk of suicide appeal was denied, and the court also rejected his claim that Indian prisons do not match the human rights standards. “We have been in touch with the UK side on the extradition request. We understand that legal proceedings in this particular matter are currently underway,” said MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal. He is now pursuing legal remedies before the European Court of Human Rights in an effort to halt his extradition to India.

A London court has ordered fugitive businessman Nirav Modi to pay ₹100 crore to Bank of India over a personal loan guarantee linked to Firestar Diamond FZE. Here's why his extradition to India remains pending.

Nirav Modi ordered to pay ₹100 crore to Bank of India as UK court rules against fugitive businessman

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian&nbsp;has formally invited PM Modi to attend multi-day state funeral and burial ceremonies for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, who was killed in a US-Israeli airstrike in February. Following Khamenei’s death on 28 February, India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited the Iranian Embassy in New Delhi to sign the condolence book on behalf of the Indian government.&nbsp;It is not known yet who will represent India at the funeral ceremonies. After the demise of Iran's then President Ebrahim Raisi in May 2024 in a helicopter crash, New Delhi had declared a day of national mourning, lowering flags to half-mast. India had sent the then Indian Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar to lead the Indian delegation in Tehran.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-uae-clash-at-brics-nsas-meet-in-delhi-tehran-accuses-abu-dhabi-of-allowing-attacks-from-its-soil-1782206407443">Iran, UAE clash at BRICS NSAs meet in Delhi</a>&nbsp;The ceremonies, long delayed by the conflict, will begin on 4 July with the body lying in state at Tehran’s Grand Mosalla complex. Public processions are planned in Tehran and Qom, followed by prayers in Iraq’s holy cities of Najaf and Karbala, before the burial on 9 July at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad, Khamenei’s hometown. Authorities anticipate millions of mourners. The events mark the formal farewell to a leader who shaped Iran for nearly four decades.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/11-india-bound-ships-carrying-crude-lpg-fertilisers-crossed-hormuz-since-us-iran-mou-signing-10-still-in-gulf-mea-1782217692758">11 India-bound ships carrying crude, LPG, fertilisers crossed Hormuz since US-Iran MoU signing</a><h2>India-Iran relations</h2>India sees Iran as part of its extended neighbourhood, a country with which it has civilizational ties. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar have engaged in multiple rounds of talks with Iranian counterparts during the 40-day conflict in West Asia.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/brics-nsa-meet-india-welcomes-iran-us-agreement-1782205021282/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/brics-nsa-meet-india-welcomes-iran-us-agreement-1782205021282/embed</a>&nbsp; Amid the fragile ceasefire, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also visited New Delhi to attend the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ meeting, holding bilateral talks with his Indian counterpart S Jaishankar. During the visit, FM Araghchi met PM Modi as well. Senior Iranian officials have made multiple trips to India in recent months, especially to attend BRICS meetings hosted by Delhi. Invitations have been extended to several countries, with a strong emphasis on neighbours. Several countries have confirmed participation or expressed intent to send representatives, according to Iranian state media. Delegations are expected from Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, Russia, China, and several Central Asian states.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has invited PM Narendra Modi to attend the state funeral of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The ceremonies, scheduled from July 4-9 across Iran and Iraq, are expected to draw global delegations

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian has formally invited PM Modi to attend multi-day state funeral and burial ceremonies for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, who was killed in a US-Israeli airstrike in February. Following Khamenei’s death on 28 February, India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited the Iranian Embassy in New Delhi to sign the condolence book on behalf of the Indian government. It is not known yet who will represent India at the funeral ceremonies. After the demise of Iran's then President Ebrahim Raisi in May 2024 in a helicopter crash, New Delhi had declared a day of national mourning, lowering flags to half-mast. India had sent the then Indian Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar to lead the Indian delegation in Tehran. Also Read: Iran, UAE clash at BRICS NSAs meet in Delhi The ceremonies, long delayed by the conflict, will begin on 4 July with the body lying in state at Tehran’s Grand Mosalla complex. Public processions are planned in Tehran and Qom, followed by prayers in Iraq’s holy cities of Najaf and Karbala, before the burial on 9 July at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad, Khamenei’s hometown. Authorities anticipate millions of mourners. The events mark the formal farewell to a leader who shaped Iran for nearly four decades. Also Read: 11 India-bound ships carrying crude, LPG, fertilisers crossed Hormuz since US-Iran MoU signing India-Iran relations India sees Iran as part of its extended neighbourhood, a country with which it has civilizational ties. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar have engaged in multiple rounds of talks with Iranian counterparts during the 40-day conflict in West Asia. https://www.wionews.com/videos/brics-nsa-meet-india-welcomes-iran-us-agreement-1782205021282/embed Amid the fragile ceasefire, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also visited New Delhi to attend the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ meeting, holding bilateral talks with his Indian counterpart S Jaishankar. During the visit, FM Araghchi met PM Modi as well. Senior Iranian officials have made multiple trips to India in recent months, especially to attend BRICS meetings hosted by Delhi. Invitations have been extended to several countries, with a strong emphasis on neighbours. Several countries have confirmed participation or expressed intent to send representatives, according to Iranian state media. Delegations are expected from Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, Russia, China, and several Central Asian states.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has invited PM Narendra Modi to attend the state funeral of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The ceremonies, scheduled from July 4-9 across Iran and Iraq, are expected to draw global delegations

Iran's President Pezeshkian invites PM Modi to attend Supreme Leader Khamenei's state funeral

Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, on Tuesday, said that Iran's ballistic missile programme was not part of any discussion in the recent Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed that it was likely to be discussed in the later stages of the talks in Gulf states. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said that he could firmly confirm "without fear of contradiction that Iran's ballistic missile program was not a subject of discussion between the US and Iran." Sharif was making those statements in a press conference with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, following a delegation-level talks.&nbsp;US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday told the media in Washington trying to ease concerns about Iran's ballistic missile program and proxies, saying that these are likely to be discussed at a later stage of the discussion. “You can’t have the end of hostilities and conflicts in the region as long as Iranian proxies are launching missiles and drones from Iraq and are participating in terrorism like Hamas did and like Hezbollah did,” &nbsp;said Rubio. “So I do think it’s covered by the MOU, and it is an issue that will be gotten to at the appropriate time in these negotiations.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/palestinian-student-killed-gaza-air-strike-exam-centre-raghad-ashour-1782146481162">Israeli strike kills 18-year-old Palestinian girl travelling to exam centre in Gaza</a>“It was not on the table”, said Sharif, suggesting that the preliminary US-Iran agreement made no mention of ballistic missiles."It is not possible that others have missiles and Iran does not have them." Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian added, “If the missiles we have for our defence did not exist, Israel and the United States would have ploughed Iran just like Gaza.” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghei said in an interview last week, “Our missiles do not like at all to be talked about by anyone.”&nbsp;Sharif condemned the “double standards”, suggesting that it was completely normal for sovereign nations like Iran to develop defensive missile capabilities, the same as every other country does globally. Sharif praised the "sagacious" leadership of Pezeshkian and other Iranian leaders and highlighted Pakistan's role as an "honest and sincere mediator" in the peace process. He further suggested that some countries are unhappy with the progress in diplomatic talks and improving relations among regional actors. So they are purposefully spreading misinformation to undermine the developments.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Pakistan’s PM Shehbaz Sharif: Some countries are unhappy and disappointed by this agreement. They are trying to sabotage it by creating confusion, doubt, and uncertainty. But our nations stand united, and we will be like an iron wall against anyone who seeks to undermine… <a href="https://t.co/aS3rWdC7EP">pic.twitter.com/aS3rWdC7EP</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://x.com/clashreport/status/2069527459490415032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🇵🇰🇮🇷 Pakistan’s PM Shehbaz Sharif: &quot;This MOU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda.&quot; These were one of Iran’s biggest weapons in the war. Now Gulf allies are furious, while Pakistan keeps pushing the “peace” narrative.… <a href="https://t.co/m2e9PDKCYh">https://t.co/m2e9PDKCYh</a>&mdash; Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) <a href="https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2069457958879236296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Iran’s ballistic missile programme was never discussed in the recent US-Iran MoU, contradicting US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s remarks on future negotiations.

Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, on Tuesday, said that Iran's ballistic missile programme was not part of any discussion in the recent Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed that it was likely to be discussed in the later stages of the talks in Gulf states. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said that he could firmly confirm "without fear of contradiction that Iran's ballistic missile program was not a subject of discussion between the US and Iran." Sharif was making those statements in a press conference with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, following a delegation-level talks. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday told the media in Washington trying to ease concerns about Iran's ballistic missile program and proxies, saying that these are likely to be discussed at a later stage of the discussion. “You can’t have the end of hostilities and conflicts in the region as long as Iranian proxies are launching missiles and drones from Iraq and are participating in terrorism like Hamas did and like Hezbollah did,” said Rubio. “So I do think it’s covered by the MOU, and it is an issue that will be gotten to at the appropriate time in these negotiations.” Also Read: Israeli strike kills 18-year-old Palestinian girl travelling to exam centre in Gaza “It was not on the table”, said Sharif, suggesting that the preliminary US-Iran agreement made no mention of ballistic missiles."It is not possible that others have missiles and Iran does not have them." Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian added, “If the missiles we have for our defence did not exist, Israel and the United States would have ploughed Iran just like Gaza.” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghei said in an interview last week, “Our missiles do not like at all to be talked about by anyone.” Sharif condemned the “double standards”, suggesting that it was completely normal for sovereign nations like Iran to develop defensive missile capabilities, the same as every other country does globally. Sharif praised the "sagacious" leadership of Pezeshkian and other Iranian leaders and highlighted Pakistan's role as an "honest and sincere mediator" in the peace process. He further suggested that some countries are unhappy with the progress in diplomatic talks and improving relations among regional actors. So they are purposefully spreading misinformation to undermine the developments.

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Iran’s ballistic missile programme was never discussed in the recent US-Iran MoU, contradicting US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s remarks on future negotiations.

Shehbaz Sharif rejects Rubio's claim, says Iran ballistic missile program not part of US-Iran MoU

A severe, record-breaking heatwave in France, marking the hottest since 1947. The extreme weather has forced major Paris tourist attractions to close early. The decision has disrupted vacations for thousands of visitors. More than half of mainland France is currently under the highest weather alert level. Tourists are experiencing widespread disappointment as they cope with suffocating conditions on the streets, in the subway, and in non-air-conditioned rentals. Many have been forced to cancel guided tours, river cruises, and neighbourhood walks, instead using umbrellas, hats, and fans to brave the heat. Some visitors are adjusting by moving to air-conditioned hotels or seeking refuge in cooler museums and churches, while others have had to completely reorganise long-planned family vacations.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/europe-heatwave-claims-dozens-of-lives-shatters-records-1782237395137/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/europe-heatwave-claims-dozens-of-lives-shatters-records-1782237395137/embed</a>&nbsp;<h3>Heatwave has directly impacted key landmarks:</h3><ul><li>The Eiffel Tower: The monument closed early at 4:00 pm on Tuesday and is highly likely to shorten its hours again on Wednesday. It typically stays open past midnight during the peak season.</li><li>The Louvre: The world’s most visited museum announced it will close two hours early at 4:00 pm from Wednesday to Saturday. Management noted that the vast palace is "not sufficiently adapted to climate change." This comes amid other recent challenges for the museum, including a $100-million jewellery heist, a water leak, and maintenance issues.</li><li>Mont Saint-Michel: The popular Normandy island landmark warned tourists to postpone their visits during the red alert.</li></ul>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/mini-version-of-hell-heat-dome-scorches-europe-as-uk-france-shatter-temperature-records-1779754084758">'Mini version of hell': Heat dome scorches Europe as UK, France shatter temperature records</a><h3>What's the reason behind the extreme weather phenomenon?</h3>&nbsp;Data suggests the heat in Paris is driven by a combination of immediate weather patterns and urban conditions.&nbsp;&nbsp;<ul><li>Atmospheric "Omega Block": A strong ridge of high pressure is wedged between two low-pressure systems, creating a jet stream pattern shaped like the Greek letter Ω. This traps a "heat dome" over France, compressing the air and forcing temperatures upward.</li><li>North African Air Plume: The alignment of these pressure systems creates a vacuum, drawing scorching desert air from North Africa across the Mediterranean and straight into France.</li><li>Urban Heat Island Effect: Paris’s dense stone architecture, asphalt, and limited green spaces absorb heat during the day and radiate it back out at night, preventing the city from cooling down.</li><li>Accelerated Continental Warming: On a broader scale, Europe is warming at more than twice the global average, raising the baseline temperature and making standard summer heatwaves significantly more intense.</li></ul>

France is battling its hottest weather since records began in 1947, forcing major Paris tourist attractions like the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre to close early. Over half of the country is under a red heatwave alert, triggering emergency health measures.

A severe, record-breaking heatwave in France, marking the hottest since 1947. The extreme weather has forced major Paris tourist attractions to close early. The decision has disrupted vacations for thousands of visitors. More than half of mainland France is currently under the highest weather alert level. Tourists are experiencing widespread disappointment as they cope with suffocating conditions on the streets, in the subway, and in non-air-conditioned rentals. Many have been forced to cancel guided tours, river cruises, and neighbourhood walks, instead using umbrellas, hats, and fans to brave the heat. Some visitors are adjusting by moving to air-conditioned hotels or seeking refuge in cooler museums and churches, while others have had to completely reorganise long-planned family vacations. https://www.wionews.com/videos/europe-heatwave-claims-dozens-of-lives-shatters-records-1782237395137/embed Heatwave has directly impacted key landmarks: The Eiffel Tower: The monument closed early at 4:00 pm on Tuesday and is highly likely to shorten its hours again on Wednesday. It typically stays open past midnight during the peak season. The Louvre: The world’s most visited museum announced it will close two hours early at 4:00 pm from Wednesday to Saturday. Management noted that the vast palace is "not sufficiently adapted to climate change." This comes amid other recent challenges for the museum, including a $100-million jewellery heist, a water leak, and maintenance issues. Mont Saint-Michel: The popular Normandy island landmark warned tourists to postpone their visits during the red alert. Also read: 'Mini version of hell': Heat dome scorches Europe as UK, France shatter temperature records What's the reason behind the extreme weather phenomenon? Data suggests the heat in Paris is driven by a combination of immediate weather patterns and urban conditions. Atmospheric "Omega Block": A strong ridge of high pressure is wedged between two low-pressure systems, creating a jet stream pattern shaped like the Greek letter Ω. This traps a "heat dome" over France, compressing the air and forcing temperatures upward. North African Air Plume: The alignment of these pressure systems creates a vacuum, drawing scorching desert air from North Africa across the Mediterranean and straight into France. Urban Heat Island Effect: Paris’s dense stone architecture, asphalt, and limited green spaces absorb heat during the day and radiate it back out at night, preventing the city from cooling down. Accelerated Continental Warming: On a broader scale, Europe is warming at more than twice the global average, raising the baseline temperature and making standard summer heatwaves significantly more intense.

France is battling its hottest weather since records began in 1947, forcing major Paris tourist attractions like the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre to close early. Over half of the country is under a red heatwave alert, triggering emergency health measures.

Hottest summer since 1947: How is 2026 France heatwave affecting Paris tourism

US Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Bethany Poulos Morrison on Tuesday (Jun 23) said that Washington was "very, very close" to concluding the historic trade agreement with India. Speaking at an event, Morrison said, "Looking at trade, in February 2026, we announced the intention to finally conclude the historic trade deal. We are very, very close." This comes after months of negotiations.But if a deal is so close, why hasn't it been signed yet? And what exactly are India and the US negotiating? WION Decodes.<h2>What is the deal being discussed between India and the US?</h2>The talks between the two allies revolve around an interim trade agreement that could eventually pave the way for a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Both countries have set a target of reaching $500 billion in bilateral trade by 2030, a goal often referred to as "Mission 500".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/us-supreme-court-makes-it-easier-to-deport-green-card-holders-what-does-it-mean-for-indians-wion-horizons-1782271724642">US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons</a>For Washington, the deal is about gaining greater access to India's vast consumer market. For New Delhi, it is about securing market access, reducing trade frictions and strengthening economic ties with its largest trading partner.Why does the US say the deal is important?According to Morrison, the agreement would open India's market of 1.4 billion people to American goods on what Washington calls "reciprocal and mutually beneficial" terms. "The administration is driving towards the goal of Mission 500, 500 billion in trade by 2030, with a real sense of urgency," she added.<h2>What are the sticking points?</h2>The US has long argued that India maintains high tariffs and regulatory barriers on several imported products, ranging from agricultural goods to manufactured products.Successive American administrations, including the current Donald Trump administration, have pushed for greater market access, but negotiations have often stalled over disagreements on tariffs, digital trade rules and market protections.While neither side has publicly disclosed the final negotiating text, several issues have repeatedly emerged during trade discussions.These include:<ul><li>Tariffs on agricultural and industrial products</li><li>Market access for American goods</li><li>Digital trade and data regulations</li><li>Rules affecting pharmaceutical and medical products</li><li>Investment protections</li><li>Non-tariff barriers affecting exporters</li></ul>India has traditionally sought to protect sensitive sectors such as agriculture, while the US has pushed for broader access for its companies.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/white-house-releases-first-official-fact-sheet-on-us-india-trade-deal-says-it-ll-open-1-4b-strong-market-to-american-goods-1770701855280">White House releases first official fact sheet on US-India trade deal; no mention of New Delhi ending Russian oil purchase</a><h2>Why is there a sense of urgency now?</h2>The timing is significant. The US is trying to diversify supply chains away from China while deepening economic partnerships with trusted partners in the Indo-Pacific.India, meanwhile, is positioning itself as an alternative manufacturing hub and a key destination for global investment.The economic relationship is already expanding rapidly. According to Morrison, 2025 was a "historic year" for India-US trade. "We raised bilateral trade for goods to 149 billion. That's more than a 20 million increase from 2024. US exports to India alone rose by 9.8 per cent," she said.<h2>What happens next?</h2>US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal met in New Delhi on Tuesday to advance discussions on both the interim agreement, which was originally launched by President Trump and Prime Minister Modi, and the larger trade framework.In a statement on X, the official account of the US Embassy in India on X said that it remains focused on securing a fair, reciprocal trade deal that opens markets for American exporters and delivers benefits to both nations."USTradeRep Jamieson Greer and Indian Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal met in New Delhi today to advance negotiations on the Interim Agreement launched by President Trump and Prime Minister Modi. The United States remains focused on securing a fair, reciprocal trade deal that opens markets for American exporters and delivers benefits to both nations," the post read.

The US says it is "very, very close" to finalising a trade agreement with India. But despite months of negotiations, several sensitive issues remain unresolved. Here's what the two countries are negotiating and why the deal is taking time.

US Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Bethany Poulos Morrison on Tuesday (Jun 23) said that Washington was "very, very close" to concluding the historic trade agreement with India. Speaking at an event, Morrison said, "Looking at trade, in February 2026, we announced the intention to finally conclude the historic trade deal. We are very, very close." This comes after months of negotiations. But if a deal is so close, why hasn't it been signed yet? And what exactly are India and the US negotiating? WION Decodes. What is the deal being discussed between India and the US? The talks between the two allies revolve around an interim trade agreement that could eventually pave the way for a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Both countries have set a target of reaching $500 billion in bilateral trade by 2030, a goal often referred to as "Mission 500". Also read | US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons For Washington, the deal is about gaining greater access to India's vast consumer market. For New Delhi, it is about securing market access, reducing trade frictions and strengthening economic ties with its largest trading partner. Why does the US say the deal is important? According to Morrison, the agreement would open India's market of 1.4 billion people to American goods on what Washington calls "reciprocal and mutually beneficial" terms. "The administration is driving towards the goal of Mission 500, 500 billion in trade by 2030, with a real sense of urgency," she added. What are the sticking points? The US has long argued that India maintains high tariffs and regulatory barriers on several imported products, ranging from agricultural goods to manufactured products. Successive American administrations, including the current Donald Trump administration, have pushed for greater market access, but negotiations have often stalled over disagreements on tariffs, digital trade rules and market protections. While neither side has publicly disclosed the final negotiating text, several issues have repeatedly emerged during trade discussions. These include: Tariffs on agricultural and industrial products Market access for American goods Digital trade and data regulations Rules affecting pharmaceutical and medical products Investment protections Non-tariff barriers affecting exporters India has traditionally sought to protect sensitive sectors such as agriculture, while the US has pushed for broader access for its companies. Also read | White House releases first official fact sheet on US-India trade deal; no mention of New Delhi ending Russian oil purchase Why is there a sense of urgency now? The timing is significant. The US is trying to diversify supply chains away from China while deepening economic partnerships with trusted partners in the Indo-Pacific. India, meanwhile, is positioning itself as an alternative manufacturing hub and a key destination for global investment. The economic relationship is already expanding rapidly. According to Morrison, 2025 was a "historic year" for India-US trade. "We raised bilateral trade for goods to 149 billion. That's more than a 20 million increase from 2024. US exports to India alone rose by 9.8 per cent," she said. What happens next? US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal met in New Delhi on Tuesday to advance discussions on both the interim agreement, which was originally launched by President Trump and Prime Minister Modi, and the larger trade framework. In a statement on X, the official account of the US Embassy in India on X said that it remains focused on securing a fair, reciprocal trade deal that opens markets for American exporters and delivers benefits to both nations. "USTradeRep Jamieson Greer and Indian Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal met in New Delhi today to advance negotiations on the Interim Agreement launched by President Trump and Prime Minister Modi. The United States remains focused on securing a fair, reciprocal trade deal that opens markets for American exporters and delivers benefits to both nations," the post read.

The US says it is "very, very close" to finalising a trade agreement with India. But despite months of negotiations, several sensitive issues remain unresolved. Here's what the two countries are negotiating and why the deal is taking time.

US says trade deal with India is 'very, very close'. What's holding it up? | WION Decodes

US President Donald Trump, in a social media post on Wednesday (Jun 24), announced that he has asked big oil companies to drop oil prices. Accusing major oil companies of overcharging consumers by failing to lower gasoline prices in line with the recent decline in crude oil prices, the POTUS said he had directed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the matter.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/us-supreme-court-makes-it-easier-to-deport-green-card-holders-what-does-it-mean-for-indians-wion-horizons-1782271724642">US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons</a><h2>Can Americans expect cheaper gasoline?</h2>In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump claimed that oil prices had fallen sharply, but consumers were not seeing comparable relief at fuel stations. This, he said, meant that American customers were being "gouged" by "big Oil Companies"."The big Oil Companies are not dropping their price at the pump commensurate with the sharply lower prices they are paying for Oil. Those prices are dropping like a rock!" Trump wrote."In other words, customers are being 'gouged.' I have instructed the DOJ to immediately start looking into this. Gasoline prices better start going down a lot faster than what I'm seeing!" he added, signing off with his signature ‘President DJT’.The oil industry has yet to publicly respond to Trump's allegations.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-asks-americans-if-ice-should-become-nice-in-unusual-rebranding-poll-says-media-would-go-totally-crazy-1782014525608">Trump asks Americans if ICE should become 'NICE' in unusual rebranding poll, says media would 'go totally crazy'</a><h2>Oil prices fall to lowest levels since start of Iran war</h2>Trump's remarks come as oil prices extended losses to sit around their lowest levels since the early days of the Middle East crisis. According to an AFP report, at 0230 GMT, Brent crude price fell by 0.7 per cent to $76.56 a barrel.Oil prices continue to fall as optimism persists about an eventual deal to end the war in West Asia.On Monday, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz reached its highest level since the war began on February 28.Global oil markets have experienced increased volatility in recent months amid geopolitical tensions in West Asia, supply disruptions, and concerns over global economic growth.&nbsp;

With oil prices falling to their lowest levels since the start of the Iran conflict, Donald Trump has accused major oil companies of overcharging consumers and ordered the DoJ to investigate whether Americans are being denied the benefits of cheaper crude. Can US citizens expect cheaper fuel?

US President Donald Trump, in a social media post on Wednesday (Jun 24), announced that he has asked big oil companies to drop oil prices. Accusing major oil companies of overcharging consumers by failing to lower gasoline prices in line with the recent decline in crude oil prices, the POTUS said he had directed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the matter. Also read | US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons Can Americans expect cheaper gasoline? In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump claimed that oil prices had fallen sharply, but consumers were not seeing comparable relief at fuel stations. This, he said, meant that American customers were being "gouged" by "big Oil Companies". "The big Oil Companies are not dropping their price at the pump commensurate with the sharply lower prices they are paying for Oil. Those prices are dropping like a rock!" Trump wrote. "In other words, customers are being 'gouged.' I have instructed the DOJ to immediately start looking into this. Gasoline prices better start going down a lot faster than what I'm seeing!" he added, signing off with his signature ‘President DJT’. The oil industry has yet to publicly respond to Trump's allegations. Also read | Trump asks Americans if ICE should become 'NICE' in unusual rebranding poll, says media would 'go totally crazy' Oil prices fall to lowest levels since start of Iran war Trump's remarks come as oil prices extended losses to sit around their lowest levels since the early days of the Middle East crisis. According to an AFP report, at 0230 GMT, Brent crude price fell by 0.7 per cent to $76.56 a barrel. Oil prices continue to fall as optimism persists about an eventual deal to end the war in West Asia. On Monday, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz reached its highest level since the war began on February 28. Global oil markets have experienced increased volatility in recent months amid geopolitical tensions in West Asia, supply disruptions, and concerns over global economic growth.

With oil prices falling to their lowest levels since the start of the Iran conflict, Donald Trump has accused major oil companies of overcharging consumers and ordered the DoJ to investigate whether Americans are being denied the benefits of cheaper crude. Can US citizens expect cheaper fuel?

Trump accuses big oil companies of 'gouging' American customers, says 'gasoline prices better start going down a lot faster'

In a June 14 interview with CBS's Robert Costa, discussing the American VP's upcoming book, 'Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith' they discussed their interfaith marriage and family life. When asked how her own religious faith had evolved alongside her husband and his conversion to Catholicism, Usha said: "I grew up in a Hindu household that was a very stable household.&nbsp;US Vice President JD Vance's wife Usha Vance has revealed why she would not convert of Christianity, despite her husband expressing his desire for her to do so. In an interview earlier this month, Usha Vance said that she grew up in a stable Hindu household and so she did not feel any need to shift to Christianity. This comes as a contrast to the statement given by JD Vance last year. In a Turning Point USA event in October 2025, JD Vance had said that he wished that Usha Vance would eventually convert to Christianity.<h2>What Usha Vance said about conversion?</h2>The couple was discussing the American VP's upcoming book, ‘Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith’. In it, Vance said that church worked for him. When asked how Usha's own religious faith had evolved alongside her husband and his conversion to Catholicism, Usha said: “I grew up in a Hindu household that was a very stable household. I have not felt the same need to seek something different that he (JD Vance) has.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Usha Vance explaining why she’s chosen to continue worshiping demons while her husband, who claims Christianity, allows it in his household. What an absolute mess. <a href="https://t.co/WRRIYAa3o3">pic.twitter.com/WRRIYAa3o3</a>&mdash; DogmaticTheoCarp (@TPageCW) <a href="https://x.com/TPageCW/status/2069408305311568310?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Speaking about his own conversion, Vance shared that Usha once told him that "Therapy didn't work for you; church does." To this Usha replied, “And it's not that therapy doesn't work for other people, but JD just didn't have the right kind of trust in that process,” she continued. “He just didn't feel at home in it, really exploring some of the feelings that he had and trying to figure out how he wanted to be the person that he wanted to be for the rest of his life.”<h2>What had JD Vance said in 2025 about conversion?</h2>"Most Sundays, Usha will come with me to church. Do I hope, eventually, that she is somehow moved by the same thing that I was moved by in church? Yeah, honestly, I do wish that, because I believe in the Christian gospel and I hope eventually my wife comes to see it the same way,” Vance said in Turning Point USA event. Notably, JD was an atheist most of his life but converted to Catholicism in 2019.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/vance-proposed-indian-troops-for-ukraine-trump-replied-indians-won-t-do-that-new-book-claims-1782257556974">Vance proposed Indian troops for Ukraine, Trump replied ‘Indians won’t do that’: New book claims</a><h2>Vance-Usha married life and controversies</h2>JD and Usha were married in 2014 and have three children together. Vance has been targeted several times for his anti-immigration stance with critics pointing out that his wife is an immigrant. Usha Vance is Indian American, born and raised in San Diego, California, to parents who immigrated to the United States from India. Last year, Vance took to social media platform X on Dec 7 and said that mass migration is a "theft of American Dream." In a sharp criticism, netizens said that if Vance is against immigration, he should first send his children and wife to India. Rumours about tensions in JD and Usha's marriage have been floating after his hug with Erika went viral in 2025.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/jd-vance-says-kristi-noem-has-great-opportunity-in-new-shields-of-america-role-wion-1773432891942/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/jd-vance-says-kristi-noem-has-great-opportunity-in-new-shields-of-america-role-wion-1773432891942/embed</a>&nbsp;In what looked like his clarification over tensions in his married life, Vance had said last year: “I think that we kind of get a kick out of it…With anything in life, you take the good with the bad. You accept that there are some sacrifices and there are some very good things that come along with it, too. But our marriage is as strong as it’s ever been, and I think Usha’s really taken to it, and it’s been kind of cool to see how she’s developed and evolved in this new role."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/erika-told-usha-vance-reveals-what-convinced-his-wife-for-fourth-child-1780816827366">'Erika told Usha between sobs...': JD Vance reportedly reveals what convinced his wife for fourth child</a>&nbsp;In his new book, Vance has made new revelations about a lot of things including how Usha Vance was convinced to have a fourth baby. He wrote that it was actually American right-wing political activist and conservative commentator Charlie Kirk's widow Erika Kirk, who convinced Usha for the baby. Narrating an incident, he said that Erika, the crying widow of Charlie, told Usha to have more babies as she regretted having only two kids. Vance adds that Erika's words convinced Usha to have another baby. Vance and Usha are expecting their fourth child, a boy, in late July.&nbsp;

Months after JD Vance said he hoped his wife Usha would one day embrace Christianity, the couple addressed their interfaith marriage in a new interview. Usha, who was raised in a Hindu household, explained why she has not felt compelled to convert

In a June 14 interview with CBS's Robert Costa, discussing the American VP's upcoming book, 'Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith' they discussed their interfaith marriage and family life. When asked how her own religious faith had evolved alongside her husband and his conversion to Catholicism, Usha said: "I grew up in a Hindu household that was a very stable household. US Vice President JD Vance's wife Usha Vance has revealed why she would not convert of Christianity, despite her husband expressing his desire for her to do so. In an interview earlier this month, Usha Vance said that she grew up in a stable Hindu household and so she did not feel any need to shift to Christianity. This comes as a contrast to the statement given by JD Vance last year. In a Turning Point USA event in October 2025, JD Vance had said that he wished that Usha Vance would eventually convert to Christianity. What Usha Vance said about conversion? The couple was discussing the American VP's upcoming book, ‘Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith’. In it, Vance said that church worked for him. When asked how Usha's own religious faith had evolved alongside her husband and his conversion to Catholicism, Usha said: “I grew up in a Hindu household that was a very stable household. I have not felt the same need to seek something different that he (JD Vance) has.”

Months after JD Vance said he hoped his wife Usha would one day embrace Christianity, the couple addressed their interfaith marriage in a new interview. Usha, who was raised in a Hindu household, explained why she has not felt compelled to convert

'I have not felt...': Months after JD Vance's comments, Usha Vance makes BIG statement on conversion to Christianity

US President Donald Trump addressed a rally in Pennsylvania and a moment from the event has gone viral on social media. Addressing the workers present at his rally, Trump asked in his classic style about who did not vote for him. Almost instantly, a person just behind the US president raised his hand. The moment has now gone viral on social media with netizens praising the worker. Some said that he has an aura better than that of the US president, while others criticised him for being present in his rally.&nbsp;&nbsp;The video went viral as the US president went on speaking without knowing what was unfolding just behind him. Even as the hand went up, Trump went on with his self-praise saying: “Young man, he wants to be, he is a young man, he thinks he is cute. As he gets pounded on now, he, he just said, ‘no, I did." WATCH the moment here&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/made-my-job-more-difficult-trump-slams-us-congress-for-passing-resolution-to-end-iran-war-what-this-means-for-the-deal-1782269867160">'Made my job more difficult': Trump slams US Congress for Iran war resolution</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">TRUMP: Who did not vote for Trump? Man behind him RAISES HAND <a href="https://t.co/r2DhXC3LWj">pic.twitter.com/r2DhXC3LWj</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://x.com/RT_com/status/2069506818909315310?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/if-they-re-not-behaving-trump-issues-big-warning-to-iran-amid-disagreements-on-nuclear-inspection-hormuz-1782179991681/amp">'If they’re not behaving...': Trump issues BIG warning to Iran amid disagreements on nuclear inspection, Hormuz</a><h2>What was the rally about and why it matters?</h2>Trump visited a Mack Trucks facility in Pennsylvania, in his first major public event outside Washington since he signed an interim agreement to end the Iran war. Pennsylvania visit is a significant one as it is a swing state and with Trump's approval rating falling constantly due to war, he made sure to use the opportunity as a poll rally speech. "We gotta win the midterms," Trump said, in one of the few references he made to the midterms. Later, however, he suggested it wasn't actually a “political season.” The trip also came amid gasoline price hikes. This is the president's fifth second-term visit to Pennsylvania, a key state whose support in 2016 and 2024 helped him to win the White House. The Macungie, Pennsylvania, facility is in the 7th Congressional District, where incumbent Republican Rep. Ryan Mackenzie faces Democratic challenger Bob Brooks in November. The area is pivotal to Republicans holding narrow control of the House.

A light-hearted moment at a Pennsylvania rally went viral after Trump asked the crowd, “Who did not vote for me?” An unexpected response from an attendee drew laughter and attention online, with the clip quickly spreading across social media and sparking discussion.

US President Donald Trump addressed a rally in Pennsylvania and a moment from the event has gone viral on social media. Addressing the workers present at his rally, Trump asked in his classic style about who did not vote for him. Almost instantly, a person just behind the US president raised his hand. The moment has now gone viral on social media with netizens praising the worker. Some said that he has an aura better than that of the US president, while others criticised him for being present in his rally. The video went viral as the US president went on speaking without knowing what was unfolding just behind him. Even as the hand went up, Trump went on with his self-praise saying: “Young man, he wants to be, he is a young man, he thinks he is cute. As he gets pounded on now, he, he just said, ‘no, I did." WATCH the moment here Also Read: 'Made my job more difficult': Trump slams US Congress for Iran war resolution

A light-hearted moment at a Pennsylvania rally went viral after Trump asked the crowd, “Who did not vote for me?” An unexpected response from an attendee drew laughter and attention online, with the clip quickly spreading across social media and sparking discussion.

'Who did not vote for me?' Trump gets unexpected response in Pennsylvania rally - WATCH

The Trump administration is moving ahead with another immigration policy change that could significantly affect international students in the United States. The White House has cleared a proposed Department of Homeland Security regulation that would replace the long-standing "Duration of Status" system with fixed periods of authorised stay, effectively placing a time limit on student visas.&nbsp;If the proposal takes effect, many foreign students would no longer be allowed to remain in the US automatically for the full length of their academic programmes. Instead, those whose studies extend beyond the authorised period may need to apply for formal extensions, raising concerns about additional paperwork, delays and legal complications.&nbsp;Under the current "Duration of Status" system, students on F 1 visas, J 1 exchange visitors and certain other visa holders can stay in the United States as long as they remain enrolled in approved programmes and continue meeting visa requirements.&nbsp;The existing framework gives students flexibility to extend their studies, transfer between institutions, switch programmes and complete work opportunities such as Optional Practical Training (OPT) and STEM OPT without requiring a new period of admission.&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, the proposed regulation would end this arrangement and introduce a fixed period of authorised stay, reportedly limited to four years for most students. The proposal has already been reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget, one of the final stages before formal publication and implementation.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/despite-iran-s-denial-trump-says-tehran-agreed-to-nuclear-inspections-rubio-rejects-hormuz-tolls-1782260904902">Despite Iran's denial, Trump says Tehran agreed to nuclear inspections; Rubio rejects Hormuz tolls</a><h2>Why Indian students could face a greater impact</h2>The proposed change is particularly important for Indian students, who currently make up the largest international student community in the United States.&nbsp;The Institute of International Education's Open Doors 2024 report shows that more than 331,000 Indian students were enrolled in US higher education during the 2023 to 2024 academic year, representing nearly 30 per cent of all international students in the country.&nbsp;Many Indian students pursue doctoral programmes, research-based master's degrees and professional courses that frequently last longer than four years. Under the proposed system, students whose studies extend beyond the fixed admission period may need approval from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services to remain in the country legally.&nbsp;The process could require additional documentation, biometric verification and closer scrutiny of applications.<h2>Concerns over uncertainty and legal risks</h2>The Association of American Universities, the American Council on Education and NAFSA have warned that fixed stay periods could create "a high degree of uncertainty" for students whose academic schedules often change because of research requirements, thesis work or programme transitions.&nbsp;The organisations also said universities could face a significantly higher administrative burden. Students relying on OPT may encounter additional difficulties if extension approvals are delayed during the transition from education to employment.&nbsp;Another major concern is what happens if a student fails to obtain an extension before the authorised stay expires. Under the proposal, students could begin accumulating unlawful presence immediately after their permitted stay ends.&nbsp;The Department of Homeland Security first advanced the proposal during President Donald Trump's first term, but it was never implemented. The plan was revived in 2025 and has now moved closer to becoming official policy.&nbsp;For now, existing regulations remain in place, and international students can continue staying in the United States under the current duration of status system until the final rule is formally published and takes effect.

Under the proposed rule, international students may need government approval to stay beyond a fixed visa period, potentially leading to more paperwork, delays and legal uncertainty.

The Trump administration is moving ahead with another immigration policy change that could significantly affect international students in the United States. The White House has cleared a proposed Department of Homeland Security regulation that would replace the long-standing "Duration of Status" system with fixed periods of authorised stay, effectively placing a time limit on student visas. If the proposal takes effect, many foreign students would no longer be allowed to remain in the US automatically for the full length of their academic programmes. Instead, those whose studies extend beyond the authorised period may need to apply for formal extensions, raising concerns about additional paperwork, delays and legal complications. Under the current "Duration of Status" system, students on F 1 visas, J 1 exchange visitors and certain other visa holders can stay in the United States as long as they remain enrolled in approved programmes and continue meeting visa requirements. The existing framework gives students flexibility to extend their studies, transfer between institutions, switch programmes and complete work opportunities such as Optional Practical Training (OPT) and STEM OPT without requiring a new period of admission. According to Bloomberg, the proposed regulation would end this arrangement and introduce a fixed period of authorised stay, reportedly limited to four years for most students. The proposal has already been reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget, one of the final stages before formal publication and implementation. Also Read: Despite Iran's denial, Trump says Tehran agreed to nuclear inspections; Rubio rejects Hormuz tolls Why Indian students could face a greater impact The proposed change is particularly important for Indian students, who currently make up the largest international student community in the United States. The Institute of International Education's Open Doors 2024 report shows that more than 331,000 Indian students were enrolled in US higher education during the 2023 to 2024 academic year, representing nearly 30 per cent of all international students in the country. Many Indian students pursue doctoral programmes, research-based master's degrees and professional courses that frequently last longer than four years. Under the proposed system, students whose studies extend beyond the fixed admission period may need approval from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services to remain in the country legally. The process could require additional documentation, biometric verification and closer scrutiny of applications. Concerns over uncertainty and legal risks The Association of American Universities, the American Council on Education and NAFSA have warned that fixed stay periods could create "a high degree of uncertainty" for students whose academic schedules often change because of research requirements, thesis work or programme transitions. The organisations also said universities could face a significantly higher administrative burden. Students relying on OPT may encounter additional difficulties if extension approvals are delayed during the transition from education to employment. Another major concern is what happens if a student fails to obtain an extension before the authorised stay expires. Under the proposal, students could begin accumulating unlawful presence immediately after their permitted stay ends. The Department of Homeland Security first advanced the proposal during President Donald Trump's first term, but it was never implemented. The plan was revived in 2025 and has now moved closer to becoming official policy. For now, existing regulations remain in place, and international students can continue staying in the United States under the current duration of status system until the final rule is formally published and takes effect.

Under the proposed rule, international students may need government approval to stay beyond a fixed visa period, potentially leading to more paperwork, delays and legal uncertainty.

WION Horizons: US student visas may get 4-year cap: What it means for Indian students

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday (Jun 23) handed the federal government broader powers to deny entry and deport green card holders accused of certain crimes. The court ruled that immigration officials do not have to meet a higher standard of proof when deciding whether a returning lawful permanent resident should be treated as someone seeking admission to the country. The ruling could have major implications for lawful permanent residents, including thousands of Indians living in the United States. It could affect about 6.7 million Indians who were in the US as of January 2026.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/green-card-applicants-should-go-home-new-us-citizenship-rule-may-hit-indians-hardest-check-how-you-could-be-affected-1779514161561">Green card applicants should go home? New US citizenship rule may hit Indians hardest; check how you could be affected</a><h2>What did the Supreme Court rule?</h2>In a 6-3 decision in Blanche v. Lau, the court ruled that immigration authorities do not need to conclusively prove, using "clear and convincing evidence" that a returning Green Card holder committed a disqualifying crime before treating them as someone seeking admission into the country. Instead, border officials only need a "reason to believe" that the person may have committed a crime involving what US immigration law calls "moral turpitude"."The Immigration and Nationality Act does not impose that requirement," Thomas wrote in the majority opinion issued following the ruling.The ruling effectively lowers the burden on immigration authorities when deciding whether a returning permanent resident should be allowed back into the country.So what exactly has changed? WION Decodes below.<h2>What is a "crime involving moral turpitude"?</h2>The phrase has long existed in US immigration law but remains broadly defined.According to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), US immigration law uses the term "crime involving moral turpitude" (CIMT) to describe offences considered inherently dishonest, immoral, or harmful. However, notably, there is no single, universally accepted definition.Traditionally, US immigration authorities and courts have treated crimes involving fraud, theft, forgery, serious assault, and offences involving an intent to cause significant bodily harm as CIMTs. Some crimes involving recklessness, malicious conduct, or sexual offences committed with lewd intent can also fall under the category.According to immigration guidance, authorities generally look for factors such as:<ul><li>Intent to defraud another person</li><li>Intent to permanently deprive someone of property</li><li>Intent to cause serious bodily harm</li><li>Certain reckless or malicious actions</li><li>Sexual offences involving lewd intent</li><li>Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/trump-just-made-it-nearly-impossible-for-indians-to-work-in-the-us-here-s-how-us-hikes-h-1b-fee-to-100-000-or-90-lakh-1758336080621">Trump just made it nearly impossible for Indians to work in the US — Here's how</a></li></ul><h2>Blanche v. Lau: What was the case about?</h2>The case involved Muk Choi Lau, a Chinese national and Green Card holder, who was stopped at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport in 2012 while returning from China. At the time, Lau was facing trademark counterfeiting charges in New Jersey. He was eventually allowed to be conditionally readmitted. Lau was later convicted, and immigration authorities sought to deport him.However, Lau continues to argue that the offence did not qualify as a crime involving moral turpitude and challenged the government's actions. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with immigration authorities.<h2>Why does this matter for Indians?</h2>Indians make up one of the largest immigrant communities in the United States.According to India's Ministry of External Affairs, around 6.7 million people of Indian origin and Indian citizens were living in the US as of January 2026. That includes roughly 3.77 million people of Indian origin and 2.31 million Non-Resident Indians (NRIs).Data from the US Office of Homeland Security Statistics shows that 66,800 Indians received Green Cards in 2024, making India one of the largest sources of new lawful permanent residents.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rupee-slide-wars-and-more-indian-students-in-us-battle-currency-crisis-no-one-prepared-them-for-wion-horizons-1780044945428">Rupee slide, wars and more: Indian students in US battle currency crisis no one prepared them for | WION Horizons</a><h2>What are critics saying?</h2>The court's three liberal justices dissented. In a dissent note, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the decision gives the government excessive power and weakens protections traditionally available to Green Card holders."I worry that the court has now handed the government a massive blank check," she wrote.She further noted that "With today's decision, the Court allows the government to return an LPR to the status of 'seeking admission' upon his entry at the border, so long as the government is able to show later that he was eventually convicted. That sequencing undermines the plain terms and basic operation of the law."Critics argue that lawful permanent residents, many of whom have lived and worked in the US for years, could now face greater uncertainty when travelling abroad if they have unresolved criminal allegations or past convictions.<h2>Does this mean Indians and other immigrants can be automatically deported from the US?</h2>No, the ruling does not mean Green Card holders can be deported automatically. However, it does make it easier for immigration authorities to deny entry and to strip lawful permanent resident (LPR) status from people as they arrive at U.S. ports of entry if and when criminal concerns arise.

A new US Supreme Court ruling has made it easier for immigration authorities to deny entry to and deport Green Card holders accused of certain crimes. The move could affect millions of immigrants, including the large Indian diaspora in America. Here's all you need to know.

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday (Jun 23) handed the federal government broader powers to deny entry and deport green card holders accused of certain crimes. The court ruled that immigration officials do not have to meet a higher standard of proof when deciding whether a returning lawful permanent resident should be treated as someone seeking admission to the country. The ruling could have major implications for lawful permanent residents, including thousands of Indians living in the United States. It could affect about 6.7 million Indians who were in the US as of January 2026. Also read | Green card applicants should go home? New US citizenship rule may hit Indians hardest; check how you could be affected What did the Supreme Court rule? In a 6-3 decision in Blanche v. Lau, the court ruled that immigration authorities do not need to conclusively prove, using "clear and convincing evidence" that a returning Green Card holder committed a disqualifying crime before treating them as someone seeking admission into the country. Instead, border officials only need a "reason to believe" that the person may have committed a crime involving what US immigration law calls "moral turpitude". "The Immigration and Nationality Act does not impose that requirement," Thomas wrote in the majority opinion issued following the ruling. The ruling effectively lowers the burden on immigration authorities when deciding whether a returning permanent resident should be allowed back into the country. So what exactly has changed? WION Decodes below. What is a "crime involving moral turpitude"? The phrase has long existed in US immigration law but remains broadly defined. According to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), US immigration law uses the term "crime involving moral turpitude" (CIMT) to describe offences considered inherently dishonest, immoral, or harmful. However, notably, there is no single, universally accepted definition. Traditionally, US immigration authorities and courts have treated crimes involving fraud, theft, forgery, serious assault, and offences involving an intent to cause significant bodily harm as CIMTs. Some crimes involving recklessness, malicious conduct, or sexual offences committed with lewd intent can also fall under the category. According to immigration guidance, authorities generally look for factors such as: Intent to defraud another person Intent to permanently deprive someone of property Intent to cause serious bodily harm Certain reckless or malicious actions Sexual offences involving lewd intent Also read | Trump just made it nearly impossible for Indians to work in the US — Here's how Blanche v. Lau: What was the case about? The case involved Muk Choi Lau, a Chinese national and Green Card holder, who was stopped at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport in 2012 while returning from China. At the time, Lau was facing trademark counterfeiting charges in New Jersey. He was eventually allowed to be conditionally readmitted. Lau was later convicted, and immigration authorities sought to deport him. However, Lau continues to argue that the offence did not qualify as a crime involving moral turpitude and challenged the government's actions. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with immigration authorities. Why does this matter for Indians? Indians make up one of the largest immigrant communities in the United States. According to India's Ministry of External Affairs, around 6.7 million people of Indian origin and Indian citizens were living in the US as of January 2026. That includes roughly 3.77 million people of Indian origin and 2.31 million Non-Resident Indians (NRIs). Data from the US Office of Homeland Security Statistics shows that 66,800 Indians received Green Cards in 2024, making India one of the largest sources of new lawful permanent residents. Also read | Rupee slide, wars and more: Indian students in US battle currency crisis no one prepared them for | WION Horizons What are critics saying? The court's three liberal justices dissented. In a dissent note, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the decision gives the government excessive power and weakens protections traditionally available to Green Card holders. "I worry that the court has now handed the government a massive blank check," she wrote. She further noted that "With today's decision, the Court allows the government to return an LPR to the status of 'seeking admission' upon his entry at the border, so long as the government is able to show later that he was eventually convicted. That sequencing undermines the plain terms and basic operation of the law." Critics argue that lawful permanent residents, many of whom have lived and worked in the US for years, could now face greater uncertainty when travelling abroad if they have unresolved criminal allegations or past convictions. Does this mean Indians and other immigrants can be automatically deported from the US? No, the ruling does not mean Green Card holders can be deported automatically. However, it does make it easier for immigration authorities to deny entry and to strip lawful permanent resident (LPR) status from people as they arrive at U.S. ports of entry if and when criminal concerns arise.

A new US Supreme Court ruling has made it easier for immigration authorities to deny entry to and deport Green Card holders accused of certain crimes. The move could affect millions of immigrants, including the large Indian diaspora in America. Here's all you need to know.

US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 24) came down heavily on Congress for passing a resolution calling for an end to the war with Iran. Trump, in a post on Truth Social said that the resolution was "poorly timed and meaningless." Calling Iran “the number one sponsor of terror”, the US president said that the resolution provides comfort to the enemy by telling them that the US Senate does not respect the US president. He blamed that Senators for “making the job difficult” but added that he will get it done, likely referring to a final deal with Iran.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-signs-orders-on-quantum-computers-and-cryptography-what-do-they-mean-for-your-data-privacy-1782185031522/amp">Trump signs orders on quantum computers and cryptography: What do they mean for your data privacy?</a>&nbsp;He &nbsp;wrote, “So, I have Iran on the 'ropes,' ready to go down for the fall, willing to give us practically anything, and for the first time in decades, respecting the hell out of the United States and its President, ME, and the U.S. Senate decides to have a poorly timed and meaningless War Powers Act Vote, telling the Number One Sponser of Terror in the World that the United States doesn’t like what I am doing to them, and I must stop, and by so doing has provided aid and comfort the Enemy."&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-peace-deal-iran-oman-hold-crucial-talks-as-trump-claims-nuclear-deal-progress-1782238301539/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-peace-deal-iran-oman-hold-crucial-talks-as-trump-claims-nuclear-deal-progress-1782238301539/embed</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260624/image-1782272324514.png"></figure>Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/if-they-re-not-behaving-trump-issues-big-warning-to-iran-amid-disagreements-on-nuclear-inspection-hormuz-1782179991681/amp">'If they’re not behaving...': Trump issues BIG warning to Iran amid disagreements on nuclear inspection, Hormuz</a><h2>Resoultion to end Iran war</h2>On June 23, the US Senate approved a symbolic resolution urging an end to President Donald Trump's military conflict with Iran. Earlier on June 3, the US House of Representatives passed a resolution ordering the withdrawal of American troops from the Iran war. In what was seen as an unprecedented move, four members of Trump's Republicans also joined Democrats in backing the measure. The move marked the first time the Republican-controlled House has attempted to force Trump to end the military operations against Tehran. As the Congress pushed for War Powers Resolution, the Trump administration insisted that the war against Iran is already over, despite ongoing exchanges of fire between the two sides' forces and no peace deal. Democrats argued that Trump violated the US Constitution by launching military operations against Iran without congressional approval. Under the 1973 War Powers Act, presidents must seek authorisation from Congress within 60 days of deploying US forces into hostilities, although successive administrations have disputed how the law should be interpreted.

Trump slammed Congress for supporting measures to restrict US military action against Iran, saying the move weakens America's position during sensitive negotiations. Lawmakers argued that military operations require congressional approval

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 24) came down heavily on Congress for passing a resolution calling for an end to the war with Iran. Trump, in a post on Truth Social said that the resolution was "poorly timed and meaningless." Calling Iran “the number one sponsor of terror”, the US president said that the resolution provides comfort to the enemy by telling them that the US Senate does not respect the US president. He blamed that Senators for “making the job difficult” but added that he will get it done, likely referring to a final deal with Iran. Also Read: Trump signs orders on quantum computers and cryptography: What do they mean for your data privacy? He wrote, “So, I have Iran on the 'ropes,' ready to go down for the fall, willing to give us practically anything, and for the first time in decades, respecting the hell out of the United States and its President, ME, and the U.S. Senate decides to have a poorly timed and meaningless War Powers Act Vote, telling the Number One Sponser of Terror in the World that the United States doesn’t like what I am doing to them, and I must stop, and by so doing has provided aid and comfort the Enemy." https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-peace-deal-iran-oman-hold-crucial-talks-as-trump-claims-nuclear-deal-progress-1782238301539/embed Also Read: 'If they’re not behaving...': Trump issues BIG warning to Iran amid disagreements on nuclear inspection, Hormuz Resoultion to end Iran war On June 23, the US Senate approved a symbolic resolution urging an end to President Donald Trump's military conflict with Iran. Earlier on June 3, the US House of Representatives passed a resolution ordering the withdrawal of American troops from the Iran war. In what was seen as an unprecedented move, four members of Trump's Republicans also joined Democrats in backing the measure. The move marked the first time the Republican-controlled House has attempted to force Trump to end the military operations against Tehran. As the Congress pushed for War Powers Resolution, the Trump administration insisted that the war against Iran is already over, despite ongoing exchanges of fire between the two sides' forces and no peace deal. Democrats argued that Trump violated the US Constitution by launching military operations against Iran without congressional approval. Under the 1973 War Powers Act, presidents must seek authorisation from Congress within 60 days of deploying US forces into hostilities, although successive administrations have disputed how the law should be interpreted.

Trump slammed Congress for supporting measures to restrict US military action against Iran, saying the move weakens America's position during sensitive negotiations. Lawmakers argued that military operations require congressional approval

'Made my job more difficult': Trump slams US Congress for passing resolution to end Iran war - What this means for the deal

Alibaba Group has filed a federal lawsuit in San Jose contesting the US Defense Department's designation of the technology giant as a "Chinese military company." The lawsuit argues that the Pentagon's determination is arbitrary, lacks due process, and has no basis in fact or law. This comes after the Pentagon recently released a blacklist of 80 companies and subsidiaries, including tech giants Alibaba and Baidu, as well as electric vehicle manufacturer BYD, for allegedly aiding the Chinese military. Under this designation, the Pentagon is prohibited from entering into new contracts with the blacklisted companies or their controlled subsidiaries starting June 30.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-rubio-rejects-iran-s-hormuz-toll-proposal-warns-against-maritime-disruption-1782270703772/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-rubio-rejects-iran-s-hormuz-toll-proposal-warns-against-maritime-disruption-1782270703772/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;The designation restricts Alibaba’s ability to retain lobbying firms in the United States. The lawsuit argues that this restriction violates First Amendment rights, noting that long-time advocates have already informed Alibaba that they can no longer represent the company. In its complaint, Alibaba emphasised that it is a publicly traded e-commerce and cloud-services provider. It also highlighted its diverse shareholder base, which is dominated by major American financial institutions such as JPMorgan, Citigroup, and BlackRock. "The effect is already being felt: advocates who have represented Alibaba for years have informed the company that they can no longer do so," the complaint states and as quoted by news agency AFP.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/vance-proposed-indian-troops-for-ukraine-trump-replied-indians-won-t-do-that-new-book-claims-1782257556974">Vance proposed Indian troops for Ukraine, Trump replied ‘Indians won’t do that’: New book claims</a>&nbsp;In response to Washington's blacklist, China imposed export controls on 10 US companies involved in defence and rare earths mining. This ongoing feud tests bilateral relations between the two nations, arriving shortly after US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Beijing to stabilise ties.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meloni-signals-truce-after-extraordinary-public-spat-with-trump-i-don-t-intend-to-keep-fuelling-this-dispute-1782265096024">Meloni signals truce after extraordinary public spat with Trump: 'I don't intend to keep fuelling this dispute'</a>&nbsp;<h3>Here's a breakdown of Alibaba's federal lawsuit against the US Department of Defense:</h3>&nbsp;<ul><li>Arbitrary" Designation: Alibaba claims the Pentagon provided no clear evidence, facts, or legal basis to justify putting them on the list.</li><li>Purely Commercial Focus: The company asserts its e-commerce, cloud, and logistics services are strictly commercial and have zero military application.</li><li>Denied Military Ties: Alibaba denies participating in China's "military-civil fusion" strategy, stating its board and management have no military ties.</li><li>Global Ownership: The suit highlights that Alibaba is publicly traded and heavily owned by Western institutional investors (like BlackRock and Vanguard), not the Chinese state.</li><li>No Due Process: Alibaba claims it spent months submitting evidence to the Pentagon to prove its independence, which the DoD ignored before publishing the blacklist.</li><li>Severe Business Harm: The label ruins Alibaba's reputation, scares off global investors, and blocks them from securing valuable US business partnerships.</li></ul>

Alibaba Group has filed a federal lawsuit against the US Department of Defense, fighting its inclusion on the 1260H military blacklist. Read about the e-commerce giant’s legal arguments against the "arbitrary" designation and what it means for US-China tech relations. 

Alibaba Group has filed a federal lawsuit in San Jose contesting the US Defense Department's designation of the technology giant as a "Chinese military company." The lawsuit argues that the Pentagon's determination is arbitrary, lacks due process, and has no basis in fact or law. This comes after the Pentagon recently released a blacklist of 80 companies and subsidiaries, including tech giants Alibaba and Baidu, as well as electric vehicle manufacturer BYD, for allegedly aiding the Chinese military. Under this designation, the Pentagon is prohibited from entering into new contracts with the blacklisted companies or their controlled subsidiaries starting June 30. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-rubio-rejects-iran-s-hormuz-toll-proposal-warns-against-maritime-disruption-1782270703772/embed The designation restricts Alibaba’s ability to retain lobbying firms in the United States. The lawsuit argues that this restriction violates First Amendment rights, noting that long-time advocates have already informed Alibaba that they can no longer represent the company. In its complaint, Alibaba emphasised that it is a publicly traded e-commerce and cloud-services provider. It also highlighted its diverse shareholder base, which is dominated by major American financial institutions such as JPMorgan, Citigroup, and BlackRock. "The effect is already being felt: advocates who have represented Alibaba for years have informed the company that they can no longer do so," the complaint states and as quoted by news agency AFP. Also read: Vance proposed Indian troops for Ukraine, Trump replied ‘Indians won’t do that’: New book claims In response to Washington's blacklist, China imposed export controls on 10 US companies involved in defence and rare earths mining. This ongoing feud tests bilateral relations between the two nations, arriving shortly after US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Beijing to stabilise ties. Also read: Meloni signals truce after extraordinary public spat with Trump: 'I don't intend to keep fuelling this dispute' Here's a breakdown of Alibaba's federal lawsuit against the US Department of Defense: Arbitrary" Designation: Alibaba claims the Pentagon provided no clear evidence, facts, or legal basis to justify putting them on the list. Purely Commercial Focus: The company asserts its e-commerce, cloud, and logistics services are strictly commercial and have zero military application. Denied Military Ties: Alibaba denies participating in China's "military-civil fusion" strategy, stating its board and management have no military ties. Global Ownership: The suit highlights that Alibaba is publicly traded and heavily owned by Western institutional investors (like BlackRock and Vanguard), not the Chinese state. No Due Process: Alibaba claims it spent months submitting evidence to the Pentagon to prove its independence, which the DoD ignored before publishing the blacklist. Severe Business Harm: The label ruins Alibaba's reputation, scares off global investors, and blocks them from securing valuable US business partnerships.

Alibaba Group has filed a federal lawsuit against the US Department of Defense, fighting its inclusion on the 1260H military blacklist. Read about the e-commerce giant’s legal arguments against the "arbitrary" designation and what it means for US-China tech relations.&nbsp;

Why is Chinese group Alibaba suing US Government over its Pentagon blacklist

Relations between Italy and the United States appeared to ease on Tuesday (Jun 23) after days of public tensions between Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and US President Donald Trump. Speaking at an event in Rome, Meloni signalled that she wanted to move beyond the dispute, saying she had no intention of prolonging the row. "I don't intend to keep fuelling this dispute," the Italian leader said, days after accusing Trump of inventing claims about their interactions during the recent G7 summit in France.The clash marked one of the most visible rifts between Trump and a European leader long regarded as one of his closest political allies on the continent.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meloni-hits-back-at-trump-my-popularity-doesn-t-depend-on-you-1781975262122">Meloni hits back at Trump: ‘My popularity doesn’t depend on you’</a><h2>The Trump-Meloni public spat: What happened?</h2>The dispute began after Trump, while speaking to Italian broadcaster La7, claimed that Meloni had repeatedly sought a photograph with him during the G7 gathering. According to Trump, the Italian prime minister had "begged" for a picture, and he agreed only because he "felt sorry for her."Meloni swiftly rejected the claim, describing it as entirely "made up".However, rather than backing down, Trump escalated the disagreement. In a post on Truth Social, he claimed Meloni had asked "over and over" for photographs throughout the summit and suggested she was attempting to improve ties with Washington for domestic political reasons. "Now, after the United States defeated Iran militarily, she wants to be friends again to get her 'numbers up.' No thanks!!!" Trump wrote.He suggested that Meloni was doing "poorly in Italy" and suggested that the issue was linked to Italy's position during the conflict involving Iran. Trump also slammed her for refusing to let the United States use Italian "landing strips or runways" during the conflict with Iran.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/italy-headed-for-early-elections-after-feud-with-trump-report-claims-meloni-is-fearing-drop-in-her-popularity-1782232560372/amp">Italy headed for early elections? After feud with Trump, report claims Meloni is fearing drop in her popularity</a><h2>Meloni's popularity 'none of your concern'</h2>The comments triggered a sharp reaction in Italy. Meloni accused the US president of launching "constant, unprovoked... senseless" attacks and insisted that her standing with Italian voters had nothing to do with her relationship with Trump."Being your friend certainly has not helped it, nor does it depend on my relationship with you," she wrote, adding In any case, my popularity is none of your concern. I suggest you focus on yours."

From G7 photo claims to accusations over Iran and domestic politics, the Trump-Meloni dispute became one of the most unexpected diplomatic dramas of the year. After days of tensions, Meloni is now calling for an end to the row. All you need to know. 

Relations between Italy and the United States appeared to ease on Tuesday (Jun 23) after days of public tensions between Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and US President Donald Trump. Speaking at an event in Rome, Meloni signalled that she wanted to move beyond the dispute, saying she had no intention of prolonging the row. "I don't intend to keep fuelling this dispute," the Italian leader said, days after accusing Trump of inventing claims about their interactions during the recent G7 summit in France. The clash marked one of the most visible rifts between Trump and a European leader long regarded as one of his closest political allies on the continent. Also read | Meloni hits back at Trump: ‘My popularity doesn’t depend on you’ The Trump-Meloni public spat: What happened? The dispute began after Trump, while speaking to Italian broadcaster La7, claimed that Meloni had repeatedly sought a photograph with him during the G7 gathering. According to Trump, the Italian prime minister had "begged" for a picture, and he agreed only because he "felt sorry for her." Meloni swiftly rejected the claim, describing it as entirely "made up". However, rather than backing down, Trump escalated the disagreement. In a post on Truth Social, he claimed Meloni had asked "over and over" for photographs throughout the summit and suggested she was attempting to improve ties with Washington for domestic political reasons. "Now, after the United States defeated Iran militarily, she wants to be friends again to get her 'numbers up.' No thanks!!!" Trump wrote. He suggested that Meloni was doing "poorly in Italy" and suggested that the issue was linked to Italy's position during the conflict involving Iran. Trump also slammed her for refusing to let the United States use Italian "landing strips or runways" during the conflict with Iran. Also read | Italy headed for early elections? After feud with Trump, report claims Meloni is fearing drop in her popularity Meloni's popularity 'none of your concern' The comments triggered a sharp reaction in Italy. Meloni accused the US president of launching "constant, unprovoked... senseless" attacks and insisted that her standing with Italian voters had nothing to do with her relationship with Trump. "Being your friend certainly has not helped it, nor does it depend on my relationship with you," she wrote, adding In any case, my popularity is none of your concern. I suggest you focus on yours."

From G7 photo claims to accusations over Iran and domestic politics, the Trump-Meloni dispute became one of the most unexpected diplomatic dramas of the year. After days of tensions, Meloni is now calling for an end to the row. All you need to know.&nbsp;

Meloni signals truce after extraordinary public spat with Trump: 'I don't intend to keep fuelling this dispute'

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has unveiled an ambitious plan to transform his country's navy into a nuclear-armed force, declaring that Pyongyang will build larger warships, amid the nation's push to expand its maritime military capabilities in the years ahead. The announcement came during a ceremony commissioning the Choe Hyon, a 5,000-ton destroyer that North Korea has described as one of the most heavily armed vessels ever produced by the country, reported state media on Wednesday.<h2>Plans already in motion</h2>Speaking at the event in the western port city of Nampho, Kim said efforts to equip the navy with nuclear weapons were already moving ahead according to plan. "The programme of equipping the Navy with nuclear weapons is following its planned course unerringly," Kim was quoted as saying by the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA)."This is a strategic course of crucial importance as it will make it possible to keep the nuclear force of our state ready for multifaceted and efficient operation," he said.Notably, North Korea is already under multiple sets of sanctions over its nuclear programme. However, leaders continue insisting that they won't abandon the nuclear programme and argue that it was essential as a deterrent against the United States and South Korea.<h2>North Korea's Choe Hyon</h2>The country had previously said that the Choe Hyon is equipped with the "most powerful weapons". Reports suggest that it is only the beginning. Kim said that another destroyer, named Kang Kon, would soon enter service, followed by a new generation of strategic warships. "Following the Choe Hyon, we will soon commission destroyer Kang Kon for operations. After that we will launch 10,000-ton strategic warships one after another," Kim said in his speech.According to his vision, North Korea should "build every year two surface ships, whose class is higher than the Choe Hyon, including a 10,000-ton cruiser".The announcement comes as tensions remain high on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea has repeatedly accused the United States and South Korea of escalating military pressure through joint exercises and increased defence cooperation. Kim recently warned that the peninsula was being pushed "to the brink of a nuclear war".

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has unveiled plans to transform his country's navy into a nuclear-armed force, declaring that Pyongyang will soon commission additional destroyers and begin building 10,000-ton strategic warships.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has unveiled an ambitious plan to transform his country's navy into a nuclear-armed force, declaring that Pyongyang will build larger warships, amid the nation's push to expand its maritime military capabilities in the years ahead. The announcement came during a ceremony commissioning the Choe Hyon, a 5,000-ton destroyer that North Korea has described as one of the most heavily armed vessels ever produced by the country, reported state media on Wednesday. Plans already in motion Speaking at the event in the western port city of Nampho, Kim said efforts to equip the navy with nuclear weapons were already moving ahead according to plan. "The programme of equipping the Navy with nuclear weapons is following its planned course unerringly," Kim was quoted as saying by the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA). "This is a strategic course of crucial importance as it will make it possible to keep the nuclear force of our state ready for multifaceted and efficient operation," he said. Notably, North Korea is already under multiple sets of sanctions over its nuclear programme. However, leaders continue insisting that they won't abandon the nuclear programme and argue that it was essential as a deterrent against the United States and South Korea. North Korea's Choe Hyon The country had previously said that the Choe Hyon is equipped with the "most powerful weapons". Reports suggest that it is only the beginning. Kim said that another destroyer, named Kang Kon, would soon enter service, followed by a new generation of strategic warships. "Following the Choe Hyon, we will soon commission destroyer Kang Kon for operations. After that we will launch 10,000-ton strategic warships one after another," Kim said in his speech. According to his vision, North Korea should "build every year two surface ships, whose class is higher than the Choe Hyon, including a 10,000-ton cruiser". The announcement comes as tensions remain high on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea has repeatedly accused the United States and South Korea of escalating military pressure through joint exercises and increased defence cooperation. Kim recently warned that the peninsula was being pushed "to the brink of a nuclear war".

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has unveiled plans to transform his country's navy into a nuclear-armed force, declaring that Pyongyang will soon commission additional destroyers and begin building 10,000-ton strategic warships.

Kim Jong Un reveals ambitious plan for nuclear-armed North Korean navy

Who gained or lost more from the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran will remain a topic of debate for years, but one thing is already beyond doubt: the biggest losers are the millions of Iranians who oppose the country’s iron-fisted theocratic rulers.&nbsp;The second paragraph of the 14-point Memorandum of Understanding on a ceasefire in the war makes it clear that Iran’s rulers need not fear American responses to the massive human rights violations that have kept the population in fear and the mullahs in power. &nbsp;&nbsp;It says: “The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.” &nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-peace-deal-inside-the-14-point-mou-that-ended-over-108-days-of-war-wion-decodes-donald-trump-mojtaba-khamenei-benjamin-netanyahu-lebanon-1781513800001">US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes</a>&nbsp;This pledge is a 180-degree reversal of President Donald Trump’s initial stance of urging Iranians to rise up in revolt against their country’s leaders and overthrow them. It is difficult to think of a more radical act of interference in a country’s internal affairs.&nbsp;Oddly, there has been little attention on the non-interference pact despite reports that thousands of Iranians had been detained after the start of the war on February 28. According to a U.N. group of experts, at least 156 people have been executed since late February, with many others tortured and denied access to lawyers.&nbsp;In January, security forces crushed mass demonstrations against the regime in one of the deadliest protest massacres in Middle Eastern history. Estimates of the death toll ranged from 3,117 by the government to 36,500 by human rights activists. Because the government shut down the internet during the crackdown and for weeks after, the precise figure will never be known. &nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-senate-rebukes-trump-with-resolution-seeking-halt-to-iran-war-1782245350784">US Senate passes resolution calling for end to Trump's war with Iran</a>&nbsp;A few days after the massacre, which prompted comparisons with the Chinese Communist Party’s crackdown on anti-government demonstrators at Peking’s Tiananmen Square in 1989, Trump posted on his Truth Social site: “Iranian Patriots. Keep protesting, take over your institutions. HELP IS ON ITS Way.”&nbsp;Nobody was ever held to account for the Tiananmen Square slaughter, and no one will be held to account for the slaughter in Tehran, less so after the American non-interference pledge.&nbsp;In its 2024 report on human rights around the world, the U.S. State Department noted that “the government did not take credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.” &nbsp;&nbsp;Amnesty International’s comment on the memorandum is worth noting: “A framework agreement that temporarily halts fighting but ignores human rights risks becoming a shield behind which impunity and repression continue indefinitely.”&nbsp;At the end of the eight-minute video announcing the war, Trump told the “great, proud people of Iran that the hour of your freedom is at hand.“ &nbsp;&nbsp;That was apparently based on the assumption that the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader and many of his top aides in the first of thousands of air strikes by American and Israeli aircraft and missiles would lead to the collapse of the state. &nbsp;&nbsp;That did not happen. What Washington had dubbed Operation Epic Fury turned into Operation Epic Miscalculation of what America’s awesome military could achieve. The war caused thousands of casualties, widespread destruction of civilian and industrial facilities and long-term degradation of Iranian military capabilities.&nbsp;But enough was left for Iran to strike U.S. bases in allied Gulf States and close the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway which carries around 20 per cent of the world’s global oil supply, and about a quarter of liquefied natural gas. &nbsp;The International Energy Agency called it the largest disruption of oil supply in history. It affected the economies of countries from one end of the world to the other.&nbsp;Weeks of intense indirect mediation by Pakistan and Qatar led to agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) providing for a 60-day ceasefire to allow for negotiations on a final peace agreement ending 47 years of enmity between the two countries.&nbsp;A summit meeting in a luxury resort in Lucerne last weekend brought together leaders of the United States, Iran and the two mediating states, Pakistan and Qatar. The American team was headed by Vice President J.D. Vance who sounded pleased about the outcome and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. &nbsp;&nbsp;American officials now portray the opening of the Straits as an achievement and tend to omit mentioning that it was an international waterway open to traffic for decades – until the war prompted Iran to use it as an immensely powerful economic weapon. &nbsp;&nbsp;A formal communique after the summit in Switzerland noted that “the two sides agreed on a road map aimed at reaching final agreement within 60 days. The timeline is so short that the third paragraph of the memorandum added the words “extendable with mutual consent.”&nbsp;The 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, took 20 months to negotiate. It involved the U.S., &nbsp;Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany and focused on nuclear non-proliferation and restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme in exchange for relief from economic sanctions. &nbsp;&nbsp;Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018, arguing that the Iranians were cheating and the sanctions were not harsh enough. He re-imposed sanctions so stiff that Iran resumed its nuclear programme.&nbsp;Whether the Trump-led deal now being worked out in “technical talks” will be an improvement over the JCPOA remains to be seen. Unlike the memorandum now under discussion, the JCPOA had no clause about interference in internal affairs. &nbsp;

Nobody was ever held to account for the Tiananmen Square slaughter, and no one will be held to account for the slaughter in Tehran, less so after the American non-interference pledge.


Who gained or lost more from the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran will remain a topic of debate for years, but one thing is already beyond doubt: the biggest losers are the millions of Iranians who oppose the country’s iron-fisted theocratic rulers. The second paragraph of the 14-point Memorandum of Understanding on a ceasefire in the war makes it clear that Iran’s rulers need not fear American responses to the massive human rights violations that have kept the population in fear and the mullahs in power. It says: “The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.” Also read | US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes This pledge is a 180-degree reversal of President Donald Trump’s initial stance of urging Iranians to rise up in revolt against their country’s leaders and overthrow them. It is difficult to think of a more radical act of interference in a country’s internal affairs. Oddly, there has been little attention on the non-interference pact despite reports that thousands of Iranians had been detained after the start of the war on February 28. According to a U.N. group of experts, at least 156 people have been executed since late February, with many others tortured and denied access to lawyers. In January, security forces crushed mass demonstrations against the regime in one of the deadliest protest massacres in Middle Eastern history. Estimates of the death toll ranged from 3,117 by the government to 36,500 by human rights activists. Because the government shut down the internet during the crackdown and for weeks after, the precise figure will never be known. Also read | US Senate passes resolution calling for end to Trump's war with Iran A few days after the massacre, which prompted comparisons with the Chinese Communist Party’s crackdown on anti-government demonstrators at Peking’s Tiananmen Square in 1989, Trump posted on his Truth Social site: “Iranian Patriots. Keep protesting, take over your institutions. HELP IS ON ITS Way.” Nobody was ever held to account for the Tiananmen Square slaughter, and no one will be held to account for the slaughter in Tehran, less so after the American non-interference pledge. In its 2024 report on human rights around the world, the U.S. State Department noted that “the government did not take credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.” Amnesty International’s comment on the memorandum is worth noting: “A framework agreement that temporarily halts fighting but ignores human rights risks becoming a shield behind which impunity and repression continue indefinitely.” At the end of the eight-minute video announcing the war, Trump told the “great, proud people of Iran that the hour of your freedom is at hand.“ That was apparently based on the assumption that the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader and many of his top aides in the first of thousands of air strikes by American and Israeli aircraft and missiles would lead to the collapse of the state. That did not happen. What Washington had dubbed Operation Epic Fury turned into Operation Epic Miscalculation of what America’s awesome military could achieve. The war caused thousands of casualties, widespread destruction of civilian and industrial facilities and long-term degradation of Iranian military capabilities. But enough was left for Iran to strike U.S. bases in allied Gulf States and close the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway which carries around 20 per cent of the world’s global oil supply, and about a quarter of liquefied natural gas. The International Energy Agency called it the largest disruption of oil supply in history. It affected the economies of countries from one end of the world to the other. Weeks of intense indirect mediation by Pakistan and Qatar led to agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) providing for a 60-day ceasefire to allow for negotiations on a final peace agreement ending 47 years of enmity between the two countries. A summit meeting in a luxury resort in Lucerne last weekend brought together leaders of the United States, Iran and the two mediating states, Pakistan and Qatar. The American team was headed by Vice President J.D. Vance who sounded pleased about the outcome and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. American officials now portray the opening of the Straits as an achievement and tend to omit mentioning that it was an international waterway open to traffic for decades – until the war prompted Iran to use it as an immensely powerful economic weapon. A formal communique after the summit in Switzerland noted that “the two sides agreed on a road map aimed at reaching final agreement within 60 days. The timeline is so short that the third paragraph of the memorandum added the words “extendable with mutual consent.” The 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, took 20 months to negotiate. It involved the U.S., Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany and focused on nuclear non-proliferation and restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme in exchange for relief from economic sanctions. Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018, arguing that the Iranians were cheating and the sanctions were not harsh enough. He re-imposed sanctions so stiff that Iran resumed its nuclear programme. Whether the Trump-led deal now being worked out in “technical talks” will be an improvement over the JCPOA remains to be seen. Unlike the memorandum now under discussion, the JCPOA had no clause about interference in internal affairs.

Nobody was ever held to account for the Tiananmen Square slaughter, and no one will be held to account for the slaughter in Tehran, less so after the American non-interference pledge.

Trump’s Iran deal betrays dissidents, ensures continued repression

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

US Federal court bars Trump administration from detaining migrants at immigration hearings

Who will pay for Iran’s $300bn reconstruction fund under MoU?

South Korea's 'Black Tuesday'- Why KOSPI suffered its worst-ever points decline

Trump mocks transgender athletes, again, despite saying Melania urged him not to

China tops supercomputer rankings: Where India ranks and why it matters

Germany cancels six F126 frigates after delays, plans shift to smaller warships

Iran calls agreement with US to end conflict 'declaration of America's defeat'

Zohran Mamdani-backed candidates sweep establishment Democrats in key primaries

Elon Musk's SpaceX sells $25 bn in bond to ease X and xAI debt burden

China's space plane releases mystery object in orbit. What's Beijing up to?

Amid differences with Trump, Netanyahu calls for Israel's military self-reliance

UK court orders Nirav Modi to repay ₹100 crore to Bank of India

Iran's President Pezeshkian invites PM Modi to attend Supreme Leader Khamenei's state funeral

Sharif contradicts Rubio, says Iran missile program was never discussed

Here's why Eiffel Tower and Louvre closing early this week

US says trade deal with India 'very close'. What's the hold up? | WION Decodes

Trump accuses big oil firms of 'gouging' Americans, says 'gas prices better...'

Months after JD Vance's comments, Usha breaks silence on Christianity conversion

'Who did not vote for me?' Trump's question gets unexpected response - WATCH

US student visas may get 4-year cap: What it means for Indian students

SCOTUS makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What it means for Indians?

'Made my job more difficult': Trump slams US Congress for Iran war resolution

Why is Chinese group Alibaba suing US Government over its Pentagon blacklist

Meloni signals truce after wild public spat with Trump: 'Don't intend to...'