Questions are mounting over Natalie Harp’s role inside the White House and the level of access and influence she has around President Donald Trump.

The scrutiny intensified after reports published private letters Harp allegedly wrote to Trump during or shortly after a 2023 trip to Scotland and Ireland. The letters reportedly expressed strong personal devotion to the president and a desire to maintain his approval.

Harp is described as a special assistant and executive assistant to Trump, and reports have portrayed her as an important gatekeeper within his inner circle. Questions have also been raised about her reported access to Trump’s Truth Social account and her alleged role as a conduit for people seeking to reach the president.

Who Is Natalie Harp? Trump Aide’s Close Access to President Raises National Security Questions

Karoline Leavitt is set to leave her position as White House press secretary at the end of August, and President Donald Trump has begun teasing possible contenders to replace her.

At a rally in South Carolina, Trump praised Leavitt’s performance while joking about her decision to leave the demanding White House role after the birth of her second child. Leavitt became the youngest White House press secretary in U.S. history when she took the position at the age of 28.

Trump said there is no shortage of interest in the position and suggested that the role has become more attractive under Leavitt. Among the names he mentioned are Scott Jennings, a CNN commentator and Trump supporter, and Margo Martin, a longtime Trump communications aide.

Karoline Leavitt Set to Leave White House Press Secretary Post | Trump Reveals Possible Replacements

Questions are growing over Natalie Harp’s role inside the White House, her close access to President Donald Trump and the extent of her reported influence around the president.

The scrutiny follows reports about private letters Harp allegedly wrote to Trump after accompanying him during a 2023 trip to Scotland and Ireland. The reported letters described her deep personal devotion to Trump and her desire to maintain his approval.

Harp, who serves as a special assistant and executive assistant to President Trump, has reportedly been described as an important gatekeeper around the president. Reports have also raised questions about her access to Trump and her role in facilitating contact with him.

Former officials and political commentators have raised concerns about whether her level of access and influence is appropriate, including potential national-security implications. The White House, however, has defended Harp as one of Trump's most loyal and hardworking aides and has rejected criticism of her role.

Natalie Harp’s White House Role Under Scrutiny | Trump Ally’s Access And Influence Questioned

The U.S. State Department has announced a funding opportunity for a research project focused on hateful rhetoric and violence affecting minority communities in South Africa. The proposed programme aims to document incidents, assess access to justice and examine whether minority communities receive equal protection.

Reports say the funding could total around $1 million, with Afrikaners specifically identified among the communities to be studied. The development comes amid growing tensions between Washington and Pretoria over U.S. concerns regarding the treatment of South Africa’s white Afrikaner minority.

 U.S. State Departmentraises Funds for African White Minorities 

A US federal court on Thursday (August 13) dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against Harvard University over allegations of antisemitism during pro-Palestinian protests on campus.&nbsp;District Judge Richard Stearns in Boston ruled that the administration had failed to sufficiently establish that Harvard violated a provision of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits discrimination based on race, nationality and other factors.<h2>Court rejects Trump administration’s case</h2>The administration's complaint largely focused on several incidents allegedly reported in March 2025. Stearns said the incidents were “too isolated and episodic” to establish an ongoing violation of civil rights by Harvard.&nbsp;The ruling comes after President Donald Trump launched a campaign against major American universities during his second term. His administration accused universities of allowing pro-Palestinian movements to operate freely on campuses amid the Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip.&nbsp;The Department of Justice filed its complaint in March, accusing Harvard's faculty and leadership of failing to address antisemitism and discrimination against Jews and Israelis.&nbsp;"Harvard let anti-Israeli demonstrators occupy its libraries. Harvard allowed an anti-Israeli encampment to persist for twenty days in violation of university policy," the department said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/jharkhand-protest-police-book-600-protesters-over-assembly-march-in-ranchi-1786627463383">Jharkhand students protest: Police book 600 protesters over Assembly march in Ranchi</a>&nbsp;<h2>Harvard also challenged funding freeze</h2>The Trump administration had earlier moved to block more than $2.2 billion in federal research grants for Harvard. The administration cited concerns over campus protests and compliance with Title VI rules related to antisemitism.&nbsp;Harvard challenged the funding freeze in federal court, arguing that the move was an unconstitutional attempt to impose political and ideological control over academic freedom and the university's internal governance.&nbsp;US District Judge Allison D. Burroughs later quashed the funding freeze.

A US federal court has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit against Harvard University, ruling that the government failed to prove the university violated civil rights laws over alleged antisemitism during pro-Palestinian campus protests.

A US federal court on Thursday (August 13) dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against Harvard University over allegations of antisemitism during pro-Palestinian protests on campus. District Judge Richard Stearns in Boston ruled that the administration had failed to sufficiently establish that Harvard violated a provision of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits discrimination based on race, nationality and other factors. Court rejects Trump administration’s case The administration's complaint largely focused on several incidents allegedly reported in March 2025. Stearns said the incidents were “too isolated and episodic” to establish an ongoing violation of civil rights by Harvard. The ruling comes after President Donald Trump launched a campaign against major American universities during his second term. His administration accused universities of allowing pro-Palestinian movements to operate freely on campuses amid the Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip. The Department of Justice filed its complaint in March, accusing Harvard's faculty and leadership of failing to address antisemitism and discrimination against Jews and Israelis. "Harvard let anti-Israeli demonstrators occupy its libraries. Harvard allowed an anti-Israeli encampment to persist for twenty days in violation of university policy," the department said. Also Read: Jharkhand students protest: Police book 600 protesters over Assembly march in Ranchi Harvard also challenged funding freeze The Trump administration had earlier moved to block more than $2.2 billion in federal research grants for Harvard. The administration cited concerns over campus protests and compliance with Title VI rules related to antisemitism. Harvard challenged the funding freeze in federal court, arguing that the move was an unconstitutional attempt to impose political and ideological control over academic freedom and the university's internal governance. US District Judge Allison D. Burroughs later quashed the funding freeze.

A US federal court has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit against Harvard University, ruling that the government failed to prove the university violated civil rights laws over alleged antisemitism during pro-Palestinian campus protests.

US court rejects Trump administration case accusing Harvard of antisemitism

Reports say there had been multiple attempts by crew members onboard USS Abraham Lincoln to jump overboard. Pressure is mounting on Trump with despair growing amid the Iran war. Tune into Gravitas at 9 PM to find out more.

US Military Meltdown in Gulf Signals End of Trump Era | GRAVITAS

A fiery exchange unfolded during a White House press briefing involving Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and reporters, with questions focusing on the Trump administration’s claims and media coverage. Leavitt has repeatedly engaged in heated exchanges with journalists during White House briefings, including confrontations over coverage of the Iran conflict.

The latest moments have renewed debate over the relationship between the Trump administration and the White House press corps, with reporters challenging official statements while Leavitt strongly defending the administration’s position.

Watch the full report for the key exchanges, fact-check moments and the latest developments from the White House.


 War of Words, Fact Check Moments on White House Press Secy Leavitt

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (Aug 12) signed a national security presidential memorandum aimed at expanding the government’s ability to use cyber operations against “transnational criminal organisations” operating from abroad. The White House said the directive is intended to help federal law enforcement target foreign-based networks involved in ransomware attacks, financial fraud and other cyber-enabled crimes affecting Americans.According to a White House fact sheet, the memorandum instructs the administration to “leverage the capability and innovation of the private sector to help conduct these cyber operations under the direction, control, and authority of the US Government.”The directive creates a framework for private companies to work with federal, state, local, tribal and territorial agencies, as well as other private entities, to collect threat intelligence and propose cyber operations against designated criminal organisations.A key element of the memorandum assigns the Department of Homeland Security, through the Homeland Security Task Force’s National Coordination Center, to establish a program “to conduct specific cyber operations that disrupt foreign TCOs.” The initiative will be overseen jointly by DHS and the Department of Justice.Under federal supervision, vetted companies will be allowed to conduct “cyber surveillance operations” and “cyber effects operations” against approved targets.“Cyber effects includes the potential ​manipulation, disruption, denial, degradation, ​or destruction of ⁠information systems, networks, physical or virtual infrastructure controlled by information systems, or information resident thereon,” the memo reads.The memorandum defines cyber effects operations as including the “manipulation, disruption, denial, degradation, or destruction of information systems, networks, physical or virtual infrastructure controlled by information systems, or information resident thereon.”Companies participating in the program must maintain a bond or escrow of at least $1 million.The involvement of private firms in offensive cyber activities is not unprecedented, but it has long drawn scrutiny from cybersecurity experts and former officials. Critics have warned that outsourcing cyber operations could increase the risk of escalation, unintended consequences and coordination challenges across government agencies.The White House argues the new framework will strengthen the government’s ability to disrupt criminal organisations that exploit foreign jurisdictions to target Americans.

US President Donald Trump signed a memo allowing vetted private firms to join government-directed cyber operations, including surveillance and disruption, targeting foreign criminal networks.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (Aug 12) signed a national security presidential memorandum aimed at expanding the government’s ability to use cyber operations against “transnational criminal organisations” operating from abroad. The White House said the directive is intended to help federal law enforcement target foreign-based networks involved in ransomware attacks, financial fraud and other cyber-enabled crimes affecting Americans. According to a White House fact sheet, the memorandum instructs the administration to “leverage the capability and innovation of the private sector to help conduct these cyber operations under the direction, control, and authority of the US Government.” The directive creates a framework for private companies to work with federal, state, local, tribal and territorial agencies, as well as other private entities, to collect threat intelligence and propose cyber operations against designated criminal organisations. A key element of the memorandum assigns the Department of Homeland Security, through the Homeland Security Task Force’s National Coordination Center, to establish a program “to conduct specific cyber operations that disrupt foreign TCOs.” The initiative will be overseen jointly by DHS and the Department of Justice. Under federal supervision, vetted companies will be allowed to conduct “cyber surveillance operations” and “cyber effects operations” against approved targets. “Cyber effects includes the potential manipulation, disruption, denial, degradation, or destruction of ⁠information systems, networks, physical or virtual infrastructure controlled by information systems, or information resident thereon,” the memo reads. The memorandum defines cyber effects operations as including the “manipulation, disruption, denial, degradation, or destruction of information systems, networks, physical or virtual infrastructure controlled by information systems, or information resident thereon.” Companies participating in the program must maintain a bond or escrow of at least $1 million. The involvement of private firms in offensive cyber activities is not unprecedented, but it has long drawn scrutiny from cybersecurity experts and former officials. Critics have warned that outsourcing cyber operations could increase the risk of escalation, unintended consequences and coordination challenges across government agencies. The White House argues the new framework will strengthen the government’s ability to disrupt criminal organisations that exploit foreign jurisdictions to target Americans.

US President Donald Trump signed a memo allowing vetted private firms to join government-directed cyber operations, including surveillance and disruption, targeting foreign criminal networks.

Trump admin to use cyber attacks against foreign criminals? Here’s what new memo says

Donald Trump’s foreign policy and economic agenda are facing growing challenges as tariffs, the Iran conflict and stalled Russia-Ukraine peace efforts reshape the global political landscape.

From sweeping tariff policies and their impact on global trade to the escalating Iran conflict, Trump’s approach to international affairs is facing intense scrutiny. At the same time, efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war have struggled to produce a lasting breakthrough, raising questions over Washington’s ability to deliver a negotiated settlement.

The developments come as allies, rivals and financial markets closely watch the Trump administration’s next moves. Tariffs have created uncertainty for businesses and economies, while conflicts in the Middle East and Europe continue to test US diplomatic influence.

Is Trump losing momentum on some of his biggest foreign-policy promises? Or could his administration still turn these challenges into political and diplomatic victories?

Watch the full analysis for a closer look at Trump, tariffs, Iran, the Russia-Ukraine war, peace talks and the wider geopolitical fallout.

Trump's Fall: Tariffs, Iran War, Failed Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks & More...

US President Donald Trump has suffered a major legal setback after a federal appeals court upheld an order halting work on his planned White House ballroom.

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled 2–1 against the Trump administration, agreeing that such a major overhaul of the White House requires explicit approval from Congress. The court said the decision over whether to construct a massive ballroom belongs to Congress rather than the executive branch.

The ruling puts Trump's estimated $400 million project on hold. The appeals court has paused its decision for two weeks, giving the Trump administration time to ask the US Supreme Court to intervene.

US Appeals Court Blocks Trump’s $400 Million White House Ballroom Project

US President Donald Trump has renewed his effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, reigniting a major legal and political battle over presidential power and the independence of America's central bank.

The Trump administration is seeking Cook's removal over allegations involving mortgage documents from 2021, before she joined the Federal Reserve in 2022. Trump has accused Cook of mortgage fraud, while Cook denies wrongdoing and her lawyers have called the allegations baseless and politically motivated.

The Supreme Court previously ruled 5–4 that Cook could remain in her position while she challenges her removal, finding that she had not been given the required procedural protections. However, the ruling did not permanently prevent Trump from attempting to remove her again.

Chief Justice John Roberts indicated that the president could pursue removal if Cook received proper notice and an opportunity to respond. Cook's deadline to respond is August 26.

Trump Renews Effort to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook | Battle Over Federal Reserve Independence

A major controversy has erupted after a map of Africa displayed by the U.S. State Department at the AIDS 2026 Conference in Rio de Janeiro reportedly mislabeled every African country.

The incorrect map quickly drew criticism from delegates and observers after analyses found major geographical errors, including Nigeria being shown as a landlocked country in the Sahara, Mozambique placed in the Horn of Africa, and Ivory Coast located on the wrong side of the continent.

The controversy deepened after reports revealed that the presentation slide contained an AI watermark, indicating it had been created using OpenAI tools. The U.S. State Department accepted responsibility for the mistake, saying a staff member hastily modified the presentation before the event. OpenAI said it was investigating the reports surrounding the incident.

U.S. Govt's Map of Africa Sparks Controversy | Wion 

The Trump administration is facing growing scrutiny over the handling of US military casualty records linked to the Iran war. A reported discrepancy on the Pentagon’s casualty website has triggered criticism from lawmakers, military analysts, and opponents who accuse officials of changing classifications to reduce the visible impact of American losses. According to reports, four recent US military deaths temporarily disappeared from the Defense Department’s casualty reporting website. When they returned, they were listed under a different category called “Overseas Operations” instead of Operation Epic Fury.

Pentagon Faces Backlash Over US Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Under Fire

The Trump administration is facing mounting criticism over how US military casualties from the Iran conflict are being reported. A controversy erupted after four American service members who died during the conflict temporarily disappeared from the Pentagon's casualty reporting website before reappearing under a different category.

Critics argue the reclassification could obscure the true human cost of the conflict and influence legal and political debates surrounding the war. Democratic lawmakers have demanded greater transparency, while questions continue over whether the administration's reporting complies with the War Powers Act and provides the public with a complete picture of US military losses.

Pentagon Under Fire Over Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Faces Backlash

US President Donald Trump returned to the White House Correspondents' Dinner, three months after the original event was cancelled following an assassination attempt. Speaking before journalists, lawmakers, and senior officials, Trump reflected on the attack, joked about running for another term, and once again criticized the media and his political opponents.

During his speech, Trump held up a "Trump 2028" cap, joked about seeking a third and even fourth term despite constitutional limits, and mocked what he described as "Trump Derangement Syndrome." The event was held under heightened security with Secret Service, National Guard, and police presence around the venue.

Trump returns to White House Correspondents' Dinner | Jokes about 2028, mocks media & third term

The Trump administration has ruled out any involvement in the extradition proceedings involving Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate. White House officials, including Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, said the administration will not intervene in the legal process. The development comes as British prosecutors have filed additional charges against the Tate brothers. Andrew Tate now faces 42 allegations, while Tristan Tate faces 17. The charges include rape, sex trafficking, assault, and offenses involving sexual images. The brothers also continue to face separate criminal investigations in Romania related to human trafficking, sexual offenses, and money laundering.

Trump White House refuses to intervene in Andrew & Tristan Tate UK Extradition Case

The US Justice Department has withdrawn subpoenas issued to The New York Times over reports concerning the security features of Air Force One. The newspaper had challenged the government’s requests for phone records and grand jury testimony, arguing that the move could intimidate journalists and violate First Amendment protections for press freedom. During a court hearing, federal prosecutors agreed to withdraw the subpoenas. The dispute began after a New York Times report raised questions about security features on a donated aircraft linked to Air Force One, including concerns over missile defense systems. President Donald Trump dismissed the concerns, saying the aircraft was being sent to a British air base for viewing by US troops and would undergo modifications.

US Justice Department withdraws subpoenas against New York Times over Air Force one Security report

The Trump administration has accused Chinese AI startup Moonshot AI of illegally using Anthropic's proprietary AI technology to develop its latest Kimi K3 model. US officials claim Moonshot AI relied on outputs from Anthropic's Claude model without authorization and even used advanced Nvidia AI chips for training. The allegations have intensified the ongoing US-China technology rivalry, with Washington now considering sanctions and trade restrictions against the company.

China has rejected the accusations, calling them unfounded, while Anthropic has previously alleged that multiple Chinese AI firms violated its terms of service. Watch this report for the latest developments in the escalating global AI race.

Trump Administration accuses Moonshot AI of using Anthropic's AI Technology without authorisation

The United States has designated Mexico’s Juarez Cartel and Los Alegres group as foreign terrorist organizations, marking a major escalation in Washington’s fight against drug cartels. The US State Department said the groups were involved in attacks affecting American citizens and interests, including a 2019 attack that killed nine members of the Mormon community in Mexico.

US designates Mexican cartels as terror groups in major drug war escalation

US President Donald Trump has intensified his criticism of major American media networks after ABC and NBC declined to air his prime-time election security address live. Trump accused the broadcasters of political bias and claimed they were part of a conspiracy against him, even calling for possible revocation of their licenses. The networks defended their decisions, citing editorial judgment, while the controversy has reignited the long-running battle between Trump and mainstream US media.

Trump vs. US media: President Donald Trump escalates fight over election speech coverage 

President Donald Trump's longtime teleprompter operator, Gabriel Perez, is under investigation by federal regulators over alleged bets placed on prediction market platform Kalshi related to Trump's speeches. According to reports, Perez allegedly earned more than $90,000 in profits by predicting words and phrases Trump would mention during scheduled addresses. Kalshi flagged the trades as suspicious, froze most of the alleged profits, and referred the matter for review by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Perez, who has operated Trump's teleprompter since the 2016 presidential campaign, is now at the center of an investigation raising fresh concerns over insider information and prediction market trading

Trump suspends teleprompter operator over Kalshi betting allegations, White house says

The Trump administration has released a new batch of declassified US military files on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), including infrared footage of a mysterious star-shaped object over the Yellow Sea. The Pentagon says the videos are intended to improve transparency but cautions that they do not confirm extraterrestrial activity. Investigators continue examining whether the sightings involve foreign technology, classified programs, sensor effects, or other conventional explanations.

Pentagon releases new UFO files: Mysterious star-shaped object caught on US Military camera

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that states can count mail ballots that are cast by election day but arrive later, rejecting the Trump administration’s push to block the practice. The 5-4 decision upholds a Mississippi law that had permitted the counting of mail-in ballots that were postmarked before election day but arrived up to five days afterwards.&nbsp;The ruling marks a significant political defeat for President Donald Trump, who called the decision a “tremendous loss”. Trump has repeatedly said that mail-in ballots are vulnerable to fraud.&nbsp;The states that allow late-arriving postal ballots are mostly Democratic-leaning, although a few Republican-led ones also allow a grace period.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/yasin-malik-faces-trial-in-sarla-bhat-rape-murder-case-35-years-after-brutal-crime-instilled-fear-in-kashmiri-pandits-triggered-exodus-1782752930044">Yasin Malik faces trial in Sarla Bhat rape-murder case 35 years after brutal crime instilled fear in Kashmiri Pandits</a>&nbsp;The top court’s ruling could affect voting deadlines in more than a dozen states that will be pivotal in deciding which party controls Congress after the midterm elections in November.&nbsp;Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the court’s majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s three liberal justices. In the opinion, Justice Barrett wrote that the ruling does not conflict with existing federal law, which stipulates that the “Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November” is the “day for the election”.&nbsp;“The election-day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose,” she wrote.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-s-ev-policy-no-tax-registration-fees-on-electric-cars-under-rs-30-lakh-no-new-petrol-bikes-from-2028-1782743406485">Delhi’s EV policy: No tax, registration fees on electric cars under Rs 30 lakh, no new petrol bikes from 2028</a> Conservative Justice Samuel Alito said in his written dissent that the acceptance of late-arriving ballots effectively postpones the date on which the electorate’s choice is made, and federal law precludes that postponement.&nbsp;“Today’s decision leaves open opportunities for voter fraud that may further undermine Americans’ faith in the integrity of this country’s election,” he wrote. “Diverse sources have recognised that mail-in ballots increase the potential for fraud.”&nbsp;Trump signed an executive order in March to stop mail-in voting ahead of midterm electionsThe US president has repeatedly criticised mail-in ballots and said that the practice prevented him from winning the 2020 election against Joe Biden.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/supreme-court-refuses-urgent-hearing-of-ram-temple-petitions-saying-heavens-are-not-going-to-fall-1782739148242">Supreme Court refuses urgent hearing of Ram Temple petitions, saying, 'Heavens are not going to fall’</a> Reacting to the Supreme Court ruling, Trump called on lawmakers to pass the Save America Act, which would mandate photo ID and proof of citizenship for voters and also ban mail-in ballots, with exceptions made only in cases of illness, disability, travel or military deployments.&nbsp;“There is no excuse for a politician, or otherwise, to be against the above three requirements,” Trump said of the Save America Act in a post on Truth Social. “There is only one reason to oppose - cheating.”&nbsp;Last week, Trump had cancelled the signing of a bipartisan housing bill, saying he would make it a law only if the Save America Act were passed.&nbsp;Republicans argue that the law requires ballots to be not just postmarked but received by that date.&nbsp;“Election-day receipt promotes election integrity and voter confidence as much today as it did when Congress passed that law,” the Trump administration told the Supreme Court in a legal brief.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/at-least-five-killed-in-mass-shooting-in-northern-germany-s-stade-town-suspect-detained-say-police-1782735568424">At least six killed in mass shooting in northern Germany’s Stade town; suspect detained, say police</a> Republican National Committee chairman Joe Gruters said after the court’s decision on Monday, “Democrats are inviting chaos at the ballot box by allowing elections to drag on for days and weeks after voters cast their ballots.”&nbsp;More than a dozen states allow mail-in ballots to be received after election day, including Alaska, Texas, Nevada, Virginia, and California.&nbsp;“This is a win for voters, plain and simple,” California governor Gavin Newsom said on X. “Today’s ruling helps ensure mailed-in-ballots get counted and people’s voices are heard through the democratic process.”&nbsp;All 50 states require ballots to be marked and submitted by the day of the election. But in 14 states and the District of Columbia, election officials will accept and count mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but received after that day. Twenty-nine states and D.C. allow at least some military and overseas ballots to be received after Election Day.

The top court’s ruling could affect voting deadlines in more than a dozen states that will be pivotal in deciding which party controls Congress after the midterm elections in November. The states that allow late-arriving postal ballots are mostly Democratic-leaning.

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that states can count mail ballots that are cast by election day but arrive later, rejecting the Trump administration’s push to block the practice. The 5-4 decision upholds a Mississippi law that had permitted the counting of mail-in ballots that were postmarked before election day but arrived up to five days afterwards. The ruling marks a significant political defeat for President Donald Trump, who called the decision a “tremendous loss”. Trump has repeatedly said that mail-in ballots are vulnerable to fraud. The states that allow late-arriving postal ballots are mostly Democratic-leaning, although a few Republican-led ones also allow a grace period. Also Read: Yasin Malik faces trial in Sarla Bhat rape-murder case 35 years after brutal crime instilled fear in Kashmiri Pandits The top court’s ruling could affect voting deadlines in more than a dozen states that will be pivotal in deciding which party controls Congress after the midterm elections in November. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the court’s majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s three liberal justices. In the opinion, Justice Barrett wrote that the ruling does not conflict with existing federal law, which stipulates that the “Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November” is the “day for the election”. “The election-day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose,” she wrote. Also Read: Delhi’s EV policy: No tax, registration fees on electric cars under Rs 30 lakh, no new petrol bikes from 2028 Conservative Justice Samuel Alito said in his written dissent that the acceptance of late-arriving ballots effectively postpones the date on which the electorate’s choice is made, and federal law precludes that postponement. “Today’s decision leaves open opportunities for voter fraud that may further undermine Americans’ faith in the integrity of this country’s election,” he wrote. “Diverse sources have recognised that mail-in ballots increase the potential for fraud.” Trump signed an executive order in March to stop mail-in voting ahead of midterm elections The US president has repeatedly criticised mail-in ballots and said that the practice prevented him from winning the 2020 election against Joe Biden. Also Read: Supreme Court refuses urgent hearing of Ram Temple petitions, saying, 'Heavens are not going to fall’ Reacting to the Supreme Court ruling, Trump called on lawmakers to pass the Save America Act, which would mandate photo ID and proof of citizenship for voters and also ban mail-in ballots, with exceptions made only in cases of illness, disability, travel or military deployments. “There is no excuse for a politician, or otherwise, to be against the above three requirements,” Trump said of the Save America Act in a post on Truth Social. “There is only one reason to oppose - cheating.” Last week, Trump had cancelled the signing of a bipartisan housing bill, saying he would make it a law only if the Save America Act were passed. Republicans argue that the law requires ballots to be not just postmarked but received by that date. “Election-day receipt promotes election integrity and voter confidence as much today as it did when Congress passed that law,” the Trump administration told the Supreme Court in a legal brief. Also Read: At least six killed in mass shooting in northern Germany’s Stade town; suspect detained, say police Republican National Committee chairman Joe Gruters said after the court’s decision on Monday, “Democrats are inviting chaos at the ballot box by allowing elections to drag on for days and weeks after voters cast their ballots.” More than a dozen states allow mail-in ballots to be received after election day, including Alaska, Texas, Nevada, Virginia, and California. “This is a win for voters, plain and simple,” California governor Gavin Newsom said on X. “Today’s ruling helps ensure mailed-in-ballots get counted and people’s voices are heard through the democratic process.” All 50 states require ballots to be marked and submitted by the day of the election. But in 14 states and the District of Columbia, election officials will accept and count mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but received after that day. Twenty-nine states and D.C. allow at least some military and overseas ballots to be received after Election Day.

The top court’s ruling could affect voting deadlines in more than a dozen states that will be pivotal in deciding which party controls Congress after the midterm elections in November. The states that allow late-arriving postal ballots are mostly Democratic-leaning.

US Supreme Court allows states to count mail-in ballots that arrive late; Trump calls it ‘tremendous loss’

The Trump administration and Anthropic have been engaged in a long feud since it emerged that Claude was used for Operation Absolute Resolve, the capture of Nicolas Maduro. Here is a timeline of the conflict that refuses to end.

The Trump administration and Anthropic have been engaged in a long feud since it emerged that Claude was used for Operation Absolute Resolve, the capture of Nicolas Maduro. Here is a timeline of the conflict that refuses to end.

Feud between Anthropic and Trump administration explained: What is going on?

A federal judge in California on Tuesday (June 24) has barred the Trump administration from making arrests at immigration courts across the United States. The ruling came after federal agents increasingly began detaining migrants outside immigration courts following their asylum hearings after President Donald Trump returned to office. The practice placed many migrants in a difficult position, as failing to appear for immigration hearings can, in certain cases, be considered an offence and may increase the risk of deportation. As a result, many felt compelled to attend court despite the possibility of being arrested.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/germany-cancels-six-f126-frigates-after-delays-plans-shift-to-smaller-warships-1782292012007">Germany cancels six F126 frigates after delays, plans shift to smaller warships</a> US District Judge P. Casey Pitts found that the policy breached the Administrative Procedure Act, describing it as “arbitrary and capricious.” He said both ICE and the Executive Office for Immigration Review had not offered adequate justification for the policy and noted that the presence of enforcement agents at courthouses created a “chilling effect” on migrants seeking legal relief. Meanwhile, James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime. "A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda," he said on his social media platform X. Trump has pushed the boundaries of executive authority in his efforts to tighten immigration enforcement against undocumented migrants, arguing that the United States is facing an influx of criminals and other individuals he considers undesirable.

James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime.

A federal judge in California on Tuesday (June 24) has barred the Trump administration from making arrests at immigration courts across the United States. The ruling came after federal agents increasingly began detaining migrants outside immigration courts following their asylum hearings after President Donald Trump returned to office. The practice placed many migrants in a difficult position, as failing to appear for immigration hearings can, in certain cases, be considered an offence and may increase the risk of deportation. As a result, many felt compelled to attend court despite the possibility of being arrested. Also read: Germany cancels six F126 frigates after delays, plans shift to smaller warships US District Judge P. Casey Pitts found that the policy breached the Administrative Procedure Act, describing it as “arbitrary and capricious.” He said both ICE and the Executive Office for Immigration Review had not offered adequate justification for the policy and noted that the presence of enforcement agents at courthouses created a “chilling effect” on migrants seeking legal relief. Meanwhile, James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime. "A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda," he said on his social media platform X. Trump has pushed the boundaries of executive authority in his efforts to tighten immigration enforcement against undocumented migrants, arguing that the United States is facing an influx of criminals and other individuals he considers undesirable.

James Percival, general counsel at Homeland Security, condemned the ruling, stating that a noncitizen ordered to be deported by an immigration judge should be considered similar to the act of a defendant convicted of a crime.

US Federal court bars Trump administration from detaining migrants at immigration hearings

The US Department of Defense is reportedly seeking $80 billion to cover costs from the ​Iran war and other expenses. This comes as US President Donald Trump faces backlash over spending billions of taxpayer dollars on the Middle East conflict as oil prices and inflation reached soaring high in the country. This comes after the US and Iran virtually signed a memorandum of understanding to end the war and reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz.According to a Wall Street Journal report, citing people familiar with the matter, Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg made the request to lawmakers seeking the fund. The newspaper added that the Pentagon has expressed concerns over running out of money for operations in the coming months unless a new wartime spending bill is passed by Congress. The situation may lead to the US military needing to make cuts in training and troop deployment along the US-Mexico border as part of a crackdown against illegal aliens.Last month, the Pentagon said that the cost of the Iran war has reached nearly $29 billion. However, Democrats and other critics have suggested that the actual cost, including the damage caused by Iranian attacks, may be much higher.AlMeanwhile, concerns about the shortage of US weapons stockpiles have also surfaced – a claim that the Trump administration has repeatedly denied. Doubts renewed after the US paused arms sales to Taiwan, with acting US Navy Secretary Hung Cao citing the conflict in the Middle East as the reason behind the move.If approved, the proposed $80 billion funding package would be allocated to replenishing munitions, covering military personnel salaries, and supporting naval operations.<h2>Trump admin faces backlash over war</h2>Meanwhile, several lawmakers have warned that they will oppose any additional war funding unless Congress formally authorises the conflict. Democrats have accused Trump of violating the constitutional authorisation by launching military action without congressional approval.Under the War Powers Act, a US president must obtain congressional authorisation within 60 days of committing American forces to hostilities. Democrats argue that the deadline has already passed, putting the administration in violation of the law.

The Pentagon is reportedly seeking $80 billion for Iran war costs and military operations. The request faces opposition from lawmakers, who question rising expenses, stockpile concerns and Trump's legal authority.

The US Department of Defense is reportedly seeking $80 billion to cover costs from the Iran war and other expenses. This comes as US President Donald Trump faces backlash over spending billions of taxpayer dollars on the Middle East conflict as oil prices and inflation reached soaring high in the country. This comes after the US and Iran virtually signed a memorandum of understanding to end the war and reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz. According to a Wall Street Journal report, citing people familiar with the matter, Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg made the request to lawmakers seeking the fund. The newspaper added that the Pentagon has expressed concerns over running out of money for operations in the coming months unless a new wartime spending bill is passed by Congress. The situation may lead to the US military needing to make cuts in training and troop deployment along the US-Mexico border as part of a crackdown against illegal aliens. Last month, the Pentagon said that the cost of the Iran war has reached nearly $29 billion. However, Democrats and other critics have suggested that the actual cost, including the damage caused by Iranian attacks, may be much higher. Al Meanwhile, concerns about the shortage of US weapons stockpiles have also surfaced – a claim that the Trump administration has repeatedly denied. Doubts renewed after the US paused arms sales to Taiwan, with acting US Navy Secretary Hung Cao citing the conflict in the Middle East as the reason behind the move. If approved, the proposed $80 billion funding package would be allocated to replenishing munitions, covering military personnel salaries, and supporting naval operations. Trump admin faces backlash over war Meanwhile, several lawmakers have warned that they will oppose any additional war funding unless Congress formally authorises the conflict. Democrats have accused Trump of violating the constitutional authorisation by launching military action without congressional approval. Under the War Powers Act, a US president must obtain congressional authorisation within 60 days of committing American forces to hostilities. Democrats argue that the deadline has already passed, putting the administration in violation of the law.

The Pentagon is reportedly seeking $80 billion for Iran war costs and military operations. The request faces opposition from lawmakers, who question rising expenses, stockpile concerns and Trump's legal authority.

Pentagon running out of money? Trump admin seeks $80 billion for Iran war costs

The move relates to adjustments under the NATO Force Model, which defines the pool of forces member states can activate in wartime or large-scale emergencies.

The move relates to adjustments under the NATO Force Model, which defines the pool of forces member states can activate in wartime or large-scale emergencies.

Trump administration plans to cut US forces available to NATO during crises, yet retain nuclear shield

The USA, which is co-hosting the upcoming FIFA World Cup 2026 along with Mexico and Canada, has dropped the visa bond requirement for fans of the five African countries which have qualified for the 48-team event. The development came Wednesday (May 12) with less than a month to go for the tournament which is scheduled begin on June 11. Algeria, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal and Tunisia are the five countries fans from which have been exempted from paying the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/football-world-cup-2026-us-entry-to-cost-15-000-for-players-and-fans-of-five-african-nations-1774491019483">bond money to enter the US </a>which ranges between $5,000-$15,000. The money, paid with visa application, is refundable whenever the traveler leaves the US or the visa is denied.<h2>USA makes exceptions for fans for World Cup 2026 duration</h2>Under the Trump administration, the US had implemented rule of vida bond money for the travelers from the countries which tend of overstay the visa among other security concerns. There are about 50 contries under the blanket of visa bond rule but now the five African countries of Algeria, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal and Tunisia have been exempted from the rule in order to help them attend the matches. The requirement from exemption, however, includes holding a valid World Cup ticket for a match in the USA. The players, coaches and other staff have already been exempted from the rule but the relief for fans came on Wednesday (May 13).Also Check - <a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/football-world-cup-2026-watch-team-of-wartime-iran-holds-send-off-for-players-ahead-of-depature-1778729931002">FIFA World Cup 2026 | WATCH - Iran holds send-off for players ahead of depature</a>"The United States is excited to organize the biggest and best Fifa World Cup in history," Mora Namdar, the assistant secretary of state for consular affairs, told the Associated Press (AP) on Wednesday. "We are waiving visa bonds for qualified fans who bought World Cup tickets" and have opted the FIFA Pass system for expedited visa appointments.<h2>US matches FIFA World Cup 2026</h2>The World Cup will see 104 matches being played including the final on July 19. 78 of those 104 matches are scheduled to be played in the USA while Mexico and Canada will host 13 matches each. A total 11 cities in the USA will host the World Cup 2026 matches: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City, Los Angeles, Miami, Philadelphia, the San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle and East Rutherford, New Jersey.

Trump admin has dropped visa bond money requirement for fans from Algeria, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal and Tunisia with valid match tickets to enter the US during World Cup 2026.

The USA, which is co-hosting the upcoming FIFA World Cup 2026 along with Mexico and Canada, has dropped the visa bond requirement for fans of the five African countries which have qualified for the 48-team event. The development came Wednesday (May 12) with less than a month to go for the tournament which is scheduled begin on June 11. Algeria, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal and Tunisia are the five countries fans from which have been exempted from paying the bond money to enter the US which ranges between $5,000-$15,000. The money, paid with visa application, is refundable whenever the traveler leaves the US or the visa is denied. USA makes exceptions for fans for World Cup 2026 duration Under the Trump administration, the US had implemented rule of vida bond money for the travelers from the countries which tend of overstay the visa among other security concerns. There are about 50 contries under the blanket of visa bond rule but now the five African countries of Algeria, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal and Tunisia have been exempted from the rule in order to help them attend the matches. The requirement from exemption, however, includes holding a valid World Cup ticket for a match in the USA. The players, coaches and other staff have already been exempted from the rule but the relief for fans came on Wednesday (May 13). Also Check - FIFA World Cup 2026 | WATCH - Iran holds send-off for players ahead of depature "The United States is excited to organize the biggest and best Fifa World Cup in history," Mora Namdar, the assistant secretary of state for consular affairs, told the Associated Press (AP) on Wednesday. "We are waiving visa bonds for qualified fans who bought World Cup tickets" and have opted the FIFA Pass system for expedited visa appointments. US matches FIFA World Cup 2026 The World Cup will see 104 matches being played including the final on July 19. 78 of those 104 matches are scheduled to be played in the USA while Mexico and Canada will host 13 matches each. A total 11 cities in the USA will host the World Cup 2026 matches: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City, Los Angeles, Miami, Philadelphia, the San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle and East Rutherford, New Jersey.

Trump admin has dropped visa bond money requirement for fans from Algeria, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal and Tunisia with valid match tickets to enter the US during World Cup 2026.

Football World Cup 2026 | US drops $5k-15k visa bond money requirement for fans from five African nations

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (April 5) escalated his rhetoric, vowing to unleash unprecedented attacks on Iranian energy infrastructure, declaring that Tuesday would be "power plant day and bridge day all wrapped in one" in Iran, and warning that there would be "nothing like it."&nbsp;"Open the Fuckin’ strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in hell — just watch! Praise be to Allah," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.&nbsp;In his strongly-worded message to Iran, Trump used foul language and invoked the name of Allah, a highly uncharacteristic and unpresidential departure from the decorum traditionally expected of an American head of state and Commander-in-Chief.&nbsp;

&nbsp;The outburst came as Trump continues to pile pressure on Tehran to open the Strait of Hormuz, the strategically vital waterway through which a significant portion of the world's oil supply flows, and which has emerged as a major flashpoint in the escalating standoff between Washington and Tehran in recent weeks.&nbsp;On Saturday, following a strike near an Iranian nuclear facility and the reported downing of a US aircraft, Trump took to Truth Social to renew his ultimatum. Referencing a previously issued 10-day window for negotiations, he warned that the final deadline was fast approaching.&nbsp;"Remember when I gave Iran ten days to MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT. Time is running out, 48 hours before all hell rains down on them. Glory be to God!, President DONALD J. TRUMP," he wrote.&nbsp;Iran has effectively halted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz since the start of the war on February 28, triggered by a US-Israel bombing campaign against the Islamic Republic aimed at targeting top leadership, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and other senior IRGC officials. However, since late March, Iran has transitioned from a total blockade to a selective “Friendly Nation” transit policy. While the Strait remains strictly closed to US- and Israeli-linked vessels, Tehran has established a controlled corridor for countries it deems non-hostile.&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)&nbsp;

On Saturday, following a strike near an Iranian nuclear facility and the reported downing of a US aircraft, President Trump took to Truth Social to renew his ultimatum. Referencing a previously issued 10-day window for negotiations, he warned that the final deadline was fast approaching.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (April 5) escalated his rhetoric, vowing to unleash unprecedented attacks on Iranian energy infrastructure, declaring that Tuesday would be "power plant day and bridge day all wrapped in one" in Iran, and warning that there would be "nothing like it." "Open the Fuckin’ strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in hell — just watch! Praise be to Allah," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. In his strongly-worded message to Iran, Trump used foul language and invoked the name of Allah, a highly uncharacteristic and unpresidential departure from the decorum traditionally expected of an American head of state and Commander-in-Chief.

On Saturday, following a strike near an Iranian nuclear facility and the reported downing of a US aircraft, President Trump took to Truth Social to renew his ultimatum. Referencing a previously issued 10-day window for negotiations, he warned that the final deadline was fast approaching.

'Open the Fu**ing Strait, you crazy ba***rds': Trump threatens to unleash hell on Iran if Hormuz doesn't open by Tuesday

Trump seeks $152 million to reopen Alcatraz as a high-security prison under the 2027 budget. The plan is aimed at boosting capacity and law enforcement. Here’s what you need to know about the notorious island jail. 

Trump seeks $152 million to reopen Alcatraz as a high-security prison under the 2027 budget. The plan is aimed at boosting capacity and law enforcement. Here’s what you need to know about the notorious island jail.&nbsp;

Trump’s $152 million plan to revive Alcatraz – Everything about the notorious prison

trump-administration

Trump Administration, News on Trump Administration, stories on Trump Administration, articles on Trump Administration, Trump Administration stories at Wion, Trump Administration news, Trump Administration latest news

trump administration

Who Is Natalie Harp? Trump Aide’s Close Access to President Raises National Security Questions

Karoline Leavitt Set to Leave White House Press Secretary Post | Trump Reveals Possible Replacements

Natalie Harp’s White House Role Under Scrutiny | Trump Ally’s Access And Influence Questioned

U.S. State Departmentraises Funds for African White Minorities

US court rejects Trump administration case accusing Harvard of antisemitism

US Military Meltdown in Gulf Signals End of Trump Era | GRAVITAS

War of Words, Fact Check Moments on White House Press Secy Leavitt

Trump admin to use cyber attacks against foreign criminals? What new memo says

Trump's Fall: Tariffs, Iran War, Failed Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks & More...

US Appeals Court Blocks Trump’s $400 Million White House Ballroom Project

Trump Renews Effort to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook | Battle Over Federal Reserve Independence

U.S. Govt's Map of Africa Sparks Controversy | Wion

Pentagon Faces Backlash Over US Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Under Fire

Pentagon Under Fire Over Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Faces Backlash

Trump returns to White House Correspondents' Dinner | Jokes about 2028, mocks media & third term

Trump White House refuses to intervene in Andrew & Tristan Tate UK Extradition Case

US Justice Department withdraws subpoenas against New York Times over Air Force one Security report

Trump Administration accuses Moonshot AI of using Anthropic's AI Technology without authorisation

US designates Mexican cartels as terror groups in major drug war escalation

US designates Mexican cartels as terror groups in major drug war escalation

Trump vs. US media: President Donald Trump escalates fight over election speech coverage

Trump suspends teleprompter operator over Kalshi betting allegations, White house says

Pentagon releases new UFO files: Mysterious star-shaped object caught on US Military camera

Supreme Court allows states to count mail-in ballots that come late; Trump fumes

Feud between Anthropic and Trump administration explained

US court bars Trump administration from detaining migrants at hearings