National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

West Bengal Phase 1 elections highlight a fierce Modi vs Mamata contest, blending welfare politics, identity narratives, temple outreach, and celebrity campaigning. BJP shifts from attacks to welfare promises, while TMC defends its schemes, making Bengal a symbolic ideological battleground.

TMC, BJP make West Bengal Election campaign a 'fishy' affair: Phase 1 ends with a bit of 'jhalmuri', Phase 2 relies on 'revri'

Diplomatic relations between Thailand and Cambodia took a sharp turn on Wednesday (Apr 22) after Thai officials conducted a religious ceremony at ancient temple ruins along the contested border. The event prompted an immediate and sharp rebuke from Phnom Penh, threatening to destabilise an already fragile peace in the region.&nbsp;The ceremony, attended by Thailand’s defence and culture ministers, was organised to commemorate the anniversary of historical border clashes. Adorned with traditional dancers, chanting monks, and water blessings, the event took place at a site currently under Thai control following a series of deadly military skirmishes in 2025. According to a statement from the Thai Defence Ministry, the "merit-making" ritual was dedicated to "brave heroes" who served in the border regions.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/thailand-cambodia-agree-to-immediate-ceasefire-ending-weeks-of-deadly-border-clashes-1766807921165">Thailand, Cambodia agree to ‘immediate’ ceasefire, ending weeks of deadly border clashes</a>&nbsp;The timing and location of the ceremony have touched a raw nerve. The 11th-century Preah Vihear Temple (known as Phra Viharn in Thailand), a UNESCO World Heritage site, remains at the heart of the dispute. While the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled in favour of Cambodian sovereignty over the temple promontory in 1962 and 2013, the surrounding 4.6 square kilometers of scrubland remain a flashpoint for nationalist sentiment on both sides.Cambodia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a scathing response, characterising the ceremony as a "provocative act" that violates its territorial integrity. "The use of cultural and religious platforms to assert unilateral claims over disputed territory is unacceptable," the statement read.&nbsp;The diplomatic spat comes as international experts from the ICC-Preah Vihear recently confirmed severe structural damage to the temple. Preliminary assessments indicate that the 1,000-year-old Hindu-Buddhist complex sustained hits at over 560 points during the 2025 hostilities. UNESCO has since mobilised emergency funds to stabilise the site, but Cambodian archaeologists warn that full restoration could take decades and cost upwards of $70 million.

Thailand's religious ceremony at the disputed Preah Vihear border temple sparks a diplomatic row with Cambodia, as 2026 tensions threaten a fragile ceasefire.

Diplomatic relations between Thailand and Cambodia took a sharp turn on Wednesday (Apr 22) after Thai officials conducted a religious ceremony at ancient temple ruins along the contested border. The event prompted an immediate and sharp rebuke from Phnom Penh, threatening to destabilise an already fragile peace in the region. The ceremony, attended by Thailand’s defence and culture ministers, was organised to commemorate the anniversary of historical border clashes. Adorned with traditional dancers, chanting monks, and water blessings, the event took place at a site currently under Thai control following a series of deadly military skirmishes in 2025. According to a statement from the Thai Defence Ministry, the "merit-making" ritual was dedicated to "brave heroes" who served in the border regions. Also read: Thailand, Cambodia agree to ‘immediate’ ceasefire, ending weeks of deadly border clashes The timing and location of the ceremony have touched a raw nerve. The 11th-century Preah Vihear Temple (known as Phra Viharn in Thailand), a UNESCO World Heritage site, remains at the heart of the dispute. While the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled in favour of Cambodian sovereignty over the temple promontory in 1962 and 2013, the surrounding 4.6 square kilometers of scrubland remain a flashpoint for nationalist sentiment on both sides. Cambodia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a scathing response, characterising the ceremony as a "provocative act" that violates its territorial integrity. "The use of cultural and religious platforms to assert unilateral claims over disputed territory is unacceptable," the statement read. The diplomatic spat comes as international experts from the ICC-Preah Vihear recently confirmed severe structural damage to the temple. Preliminary assessments indicate that the 1,000-year-old Hindu-Buddhist complex sustained hits at over 560 points during the 2025 hostilities. UNESCO has since mobilised emergency funds to stabilise the site, but Cambodian archaeologists warn that full restoration could take decades and cost upwards of $70 million.

Thailand's religious ceremony at the disputed Preah Vihear border temple sparks a diplomatic row with Cambodia, as 2026 tensions threaten a fragile ceasefire.

Tensions reignite as Thailand holds ceremony at disputed temple near Cambodia border

Israel’s observer status at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe could be suspended following the passage of a controversial new law mandating the death penalty for Palestinians convicted of certain offences, the body’s president has warned.&nbsp;Petra Bayr, president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Pace, said that abandoning capital punishment was “really a requirement” for holding observer status at the Strasbourg-based human rights body, which is separate from the European Union.&nbsp;“The Israeli parliament’s observer status might be suspended until there is a decision [against the law] or until it is clear that the law will not go into force,” Bayr said, speaking to the Guardian. “There are red lines … even a non-discriminatory death penalty is a no-go.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-ahmad-vahidi-is-irgc-chief-shaping-iran-s-war-decisions-here-s-what-we-know-1776860766179">Who is Ahmad Vahidi? Is IRGC chief shaping Iran’s war decisions? Here’s what we know</a>&nbsp;Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, recently passed legislation mandating the death penalty for Palestinians convicted of deadly acts of terror in military courts in the occupied Palestinian territories. Palestinians tried in Israeli civilian courts could face either the death penalty or life imprisonment. The law includes a provision that effectively shields Jewish Israelis, applying only to murders committed with the “intent to deny the existence of the state of Israel”.&nbsp;Human rights organisations have already petitioned the Supreme Court of Israel to strike down the legislation.&nbsp;The Knesset has held observer status at Pace since 1957. The assembly brings together parliamentarians from 46 member states to promote democracy and human rights and oversees the European Court of Human Rights. Officials said they could not recall any parliament previously losing observer status.&nbsp;However, precedent exists for punitive action within the wider Council of Europe framework. Russia was stripped of voting rights in 2014 following the annexation of Crimea and was later expelled after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/what-is-barak-8-the-missile-that-saved-delhi-from-pakistani-strike-during-operation-sindoor-a-year-after-pahalgam-attack-1776845399376">What is Barak 8? The missile that saved Delhi from Pakistani strike during Operation Sindoor | A year after Pahalgam attack</a>&nbsp;Israel’s status had already come under scrutiny after a cross-party motion last June urged Israeli authorities to comply with international humanitarian law in Gaza, citing concerns over starvation, limited medical access and lack of safe refuge for civilians. While such motions can take up to two years to translate into binding action, Bayr indicated the process could be accelerated, with a decision potentially brought forward in June.&nbsp;She suggested that concerns over the death penalty law could be incorporated into the same text.&nbsp;The assembly is also expected to debate the issue this month during a vote on capital punishment based on a report by Gala Veldhoen, a Dutch MP. The report urges Israel to maintain its long-standing abolition of the death penalty for ordinary crimes and to refrain from expanding capital punishment “in a discriminatory manner”.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Meirav Ben-Ari, who leads Israel’s delegation to the PACE, criticised the legislation, calling it “entirely contrary to my worldview and that of many Israelis”. She said petitions had already been filed with the Supreme Court and expressed confidence that the judiciary would strike down significant parts of the law, “if not the law entirely”.&nbsp;Ben-Ari also urged the assembly to avoid punitive steps, saying she hoped cooperation with Pace would continue to advance shared democratic values. Israel abolished the death penalty for most crimes in 1954 and has maintained a de facto moratorium for decades. The last execution carried out in the country was that of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in 1962.

The Council of Europe warned that Israel’s observer status may be suspended following a discriminatory new death penalty law, which violates the human rights body’s fundamental requirement for capital punishment abolition.

Israel’s observer status at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe could be suspended following the passage of a controversial new law mandating the death penalty for Palestinians convicted of certain offences, the body’s president has warned. Petra Bayr, president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Pace, said that abandoning capital punishment was “really a requirement” for holding observer status at the Strasbourg-based human rights body, which is separate from the European Union. “The Israeli parliament’s observer status might be suspended until there is a decision [against the law] or until it is clear that the law will not go into force,” Bayr said, speaking to the Guardian. “There are red lines … even a non-discriminatory death penalty is a no-go.” Also read: Who is Ahmad Vahidi? Is IRGC chief shaping Iran’s war decisions? Here’s what we know Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, recently passed legislation mandating the death penalty for Palestinians convicted of deadly acts of terror in military courts in the occupied Palestinian territories. Palestinians tried in Israeli civilian courts could face either the death penalty or life imprisonment. The law includes a provision that effectively shields Jewish Israelis, applying only to murders committed with the “intent to deny the existence of the state of Israel”. Human rights organisations have already petitioned the Supreme Court of Israel to strike down the legislation. The Knesset has held observer status at Pace since 1957. The assembly brings together parliamentarians from 46 member states to promote democracy and human rights and oversees the European Court of Human Rights. Officials said they could not recall any parliament previously losing observer status. However, precedent exists for punitive action within the wider Council of Europe framework. Russia was stripped of voting rights in 2014 following the annexation of Crimea and was later expelled after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Also read: What is Barak 8? The missile that saved Delhi from Pakistani strike during Operation Sindoor | A year after Pahalgam attack Israel’s status had already come under scrutiny after a cross-party motion last June urged Israeli authorities to comply with international humanitarian law in Gaza, citing concerns over starvation, limited medical access and lack of safe refuge for civilians. While such motions can take up to two years to translate into binding action, Bayr indicated the process could be accelerated, with a decision potentially brought forward in June. She suggested that concerns over the death penalty law could be incorporated into the same text. The assembly is also expected to debate the issue this month during a vote on capital punishment based on a report by Gala Veldhoen, a Dutch MP. The report urges Israel to maintain its long-standing abolition of the death penalty for ordinary crimes and to refrain from expanding capital punishment “in a discriminatory manner”. Meanwhile, Meirav Ben-Ari, who leads Israel’s delegation to the PACE, criticised the legislation, calling it “entirely contrary to my worldview and that of many Israelis”. She said petitions had already been filed with the Supreme Court and expressed confidence that the judiciary would strike down significant parts of the law, “if not the law entirely”. Ben-Ari also urged the assembly to avoid punitive steps, saying she hoped cooperation with Pace would continue to advance shared democratic values. Israel abolished the death penalty for most crimes in 1954 and has maintained a de facto moratorium for decades. The last execution carried out in the country was that of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in 1962.

The Council of Europe warned that Israel’s observer status may be suspended following a discriminatory new death penalty law, which violates the human rights body’s fundamental requirement for capital punishment abolition.

Israel faces possible suspension from European rights body over new death penalty law

In late March, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) unveiled its Atlas drone swarm system, a mobile battlefield platform designed to deploy and coordinate large numbers of drones from a single command point. Mounted on vehicles, the system is intended to launch up to 96 drones in a coordinated swarm, with control consolidated under one operator. Chinese state-linked reporting describes it as a mobile ‘mini-battlefield network’, integrating rapid launch capability, mobility, and multi-role drone functions.&nbsp;The system reflects a broader shift in modern warfare towards networked, unmanned operations. Built around a Swarm-2 combat vehicle, a command unit, and a support vehicle, Atlas is designed for reconnaissance, electronic disruption, and coordinated strikes. With launch intervals of under three seconds per drone, it can deploy a full swarm in minutes, underscoring China’s emphasis on high-speed, coordinated unmanned systems in future battlefield concepts..<h3>System architecture and rapid mass launch capability</h3>The Swarm-2 platform can carry and launch up to 48 fixed-wing drones, while a single command vehicle can control up to 96 drones simultaneously in a coordinated swarm.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/50-of-stockpile-depleted-what-are-us-thaad-missiles-what-makes-them-so-rare-and-critical-1776856670084">'50% of stockpile depleted': What are US THAAD missiles, what makes them so rare and critical?</a>&nbsp;The three seconds launch sequencing between drones allows the full deployment of 96 drones within roughly 300 seconds for reconnaissance or attack missions. According to PLA-linked demonstrations, the system enables flexible grouping of drones into different operational formations, including coordinated defensive structures and precision strike patterns.<h3>Operational capability and swarm functions</h3>Each drone within the Atlas system can carry different payloads, conduct electro-optical reconnaissance, and relay communications. The system is designed for swarm-level coordination, where drones can adapt formations and execute tasks collectively while retaining individual autonomy.&nbsp;Comparative references in Chinese defence commentary note that other systems, such as the US DARPA ‘Offset’ programme and the “Perdix” micro-drone swarm, have demonstrated large-scale deployments. China’s own ‘Jiu Tian’ drone mothership concept has also been reported to release 100–150 drones. The Atlas system is distinguished in official descriptions by its emphasis on coordinated control rather than sheer numbers alone.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/with-hormuz-disrupted-what-are-the-alternative-routes-for-middle-east-oil-and-gs-exports-and-are-they-enough-1776856704192">With Hormuz disrupted, what are the alternative routes for Middle East oil and gas exports—and are they enough?</a><h3>Manufacturer and strategic context</h3>The system is manufactured by China Electronic Technology Group Corporation (CETC), a state-owned defence electronics conglomerate working closely with the PLA. CETC has been central to China’s military-electronics development and operates within the country’s broader civil-military integration strategy. Its fields include communications equipment, computers, electronic equipment, software development, research services, investment and asset management for civil and military applications.&nbsp;The Atlas drone swarm system has reportedly undergone multiple advanced trials, including a full public-facing demonstration conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in March. This marked one of the first instances in which the system’s integrated launch and control capabilities were shown in a coordinated format. However, there has been no official confirmation from Beijing regarding operational battlefield deployment or a formal export version.Debate around exportability remains open.&nbsp;&nbsp;Chinese military affairs expert Wang Yunfei told the Global Times the system could greatly expand battlefield use, including saturation attacks on enemy air defenses, precision strikes and deep-strike missions. More broadly, the Atlas system fits into China’s doctrine of'intelligentized warfare', outlined in PLA strategic writings and the 14th Five-Year Plan, which envisions future conflicts as increasingly uncrewed, networked, and AI-driven.&nbsp;

Built around a Swarm-2 combat vehicle, a command unit, and a support vehicle, Atlas is designed for reconnaissance, electronic disruption, and coordinated strikes. 

In late March, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) unveiled its Atlas drone swarm system, a mobile battlefield platform designed to deploy and coordinate large numbers of drones from a single command point. Mounted on vehicles, the system is intended to launch up to 96 drones in a coordinated swarm, with control consolidated under one operator. Chinese state-linked reporting describes it as a mobile ‘mini-battlefield network’, integrating rapid launch capability, mobility, and multi-role drone functions. The system reflects a broader shift in modern warfare towards networked, unmanned operations. Built around a Swarm-2 combat vehicle, a command unit, and a support vehicle, Atlas is designed for reconnaissance, electronic disruption, and coordinated strikes. With launch intervals of under three seconds per drone, it can deploy a full swarm in minutes, underscoring China’s emphasis on high-speed, coordinated unmanned systems in future battlefield concepts.. System architecture and rapid mass launch capability The Swarm-2 platform can carry and launch up to 48 fixed-wing drones, while a single command vehicle can control up to 96 drones simultaneously in a coordinated swarm. ALSO READ: '50% of stockpile depleted': What are US THAAD missiles, what makes them so rare and critical? The three seconds launch sequencing between drones allows the full deployment of 96 drones within roughly 300 seconds for reconnaissance or attack missions. According to PLA-linked demonstrations, the system enables flexible grouping of drones into different operational formations, including coordinated defensive structures and precision strike patterns. Operational capability and swarm functions Each drone within the Atlas system can carry different payloads, conduct electro-optical reconnaissance, and relay communications. The system is designed for swarm-level coordination, where drones can adapt formations and execute tasks collectively while retaining individual autonomy. Comparative references in Chinese defence commentary note that other systems, such as the US DARPA ‘Offset’ programme and the “Perdix” micro-drone swarm, have demonstrated large-scale deployments. China’s own ‘Jiu Tian’ drone mothership concept has also been reported to release 100–150 drones. The Atlas system is distinguished in official descriptions by its emphasis on coordinated control rather than sheer numbers alone. ALSO READ: With Hormuz disrupted, what are the alternative routes for Middle East oil and gas exports—and are they enough? Manufacturer and strategic context The system is manufactured by China Electronic Technology Group Corporation (CETC), a state-owned defence electronics conglomerate working closely with the PLA. CETC has been central to China’s military-electronics development and operates within the country’s broader civil-military integration strategy. Its fields include communications equipment, computers, electronic equipment, software development, research services, investment and asset management for civil and military applications. The Atlas drone swarm system has reportedly undergone multiple advanced trials, including a full public-facing demonstration conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in March. This marked one of the first instances in which the system’s integrated launch and control capabilities were shown in a coordinated format. However, there has been no official confirmation from Beijing regarding operational battlefield deployment or a formal export version. Debate around exportability remains open. Chinese military affairs expert Wang Yunfei told the Global Times the system could greatly expand battlefield use, including saturation attacks on enemy air defenses, precision strikes and deep-strike missions. More broadly, the Atlas system fits into China’s doctrine of'intelligentized warfare', outlined in PLA strategic writings and the 14th Five-Year Plan, which envisions future conflicts as increasingly uncrewed, networked, and AI-driven.

Built around a Swarm-2 combat vehicle, a command unit, and a support vehicle, Atlas is designed for reconnaissance, electronic disruption, and coordinated strikes.&nbsp;

What is China’s Atlas Drone Swarm System and is it emerging as a security concern for India and the world?

Nepal’s Home Minister Sudhan Gurung resigned on Wednesday (April 22) after mounting scrutiny over his alleged financial links to a controversial businessman being investigated for money laundering, stating that “ethics is greater than position”. Gurung announced his decision in a Facebook post, saying public trust must take precedence over holding office. He said he stepped down to allow an impartial investigation into allegations surrounding his investments and to avoid any conflict of interest while serving in government.&nbsp;“For me, ethics is greater than position, and there is no greater force than public trust,” Gurung wrote, adding that Nepal’s emerging Gen Z-led movement demanding transparency and accountability had reinforced the need for clean public life and responsible leadership. He said his resignation would ensure that any probes related to him could proceed without influence or interference.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/not-even-a-month-in-office-nepal-s-balen-shah-govt-already-facing-protests-here-s-why-1776857529331">Not even a month in office, Nepal’s Balen Shah govt already facing protests</a><h2>Why Gurung resigned</h2>The controversy stems from Gurung’s reported shareholdings in companies linked to businessman Deepak Bhatta, who is currently under investigation in a money laundering case. Documents made public in recent days showed Gurung held shares in Star Micro Insurance and Liberty Micro Insurance, firms allegedly associated with Bhatta, according to The Kathmandu Post.&nbsp;In his statement, Gurung said he had taken seriously the public debate surrounding his financial disclosures and investments. He maintained that his assets had been declared and that owning shares in a company did not imply involvement with all associated individuals.&nbsp;He also noted that the probe into Bhatta is being handled by the Department of Money Laundering Investigation under the Finance Ministry, not the Home Ministry, rejecting suggestions of any institutional conflict, The Kathmandu Post reported.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-are-going-to-kill-him-us-army-nuke-chief-reveals-sensitive-information-on-iran-war-in-viral-video-1776852819813">US Army nuke chief reveals sensitive information on Iran war in viral video</a>&nbsp;Questions over his asset declaration intensified after reports suggested that investments of around 2.5 million Nepali rupees each in the two insurance firms were not separately disclosed. Gurung said these were included within a broader declaration of more than 27 million Nepali rupees in securities investments. Critics, however, raised concerns after it emerged that the companies were not publicly traded, prompting scrutiny over how the shares were categorised.&nbsp;Gurung had earlier denied wrongdoing and pledged cooperation with investigators. In a Facebook post earlier this week, he dismissed what he described as rumours and urged a distinction between allegations and verified facts.<h2>Political context</h2>The resignation comes at a politically sensitive time for Nepal, with the government led by Prime Minister Balendra Shah, popularly known as Balen Shah, facing protests over customs enforcement at the India-Nepal border and a reported move to delink student unions from political groups.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Nepal’s Home Minister Sudhan Gurung resigned on April 22 following scrutiny over alleged financial ties to a businessman under investigation for money laundering, citing the need to maintain public trust.

Nepal’s Home Minister Sudhan Gurung resigned on Wednesday (April 22) after mounting scrutiny over his alleged financial links to a controversial businessman being investigated for money laundering, stating that “ethics is greater than position”. Gurung announced his decision in a Facebook post, saying public trust must take precedence over holding office. He said he stepped down to allow an impartial investigation into allegations surrounding his investments and to avoid any conflict of interest while serving in government. “For me, ethics is greater than position, and there is no greater force than public trust,” Gurung wrote, adding that Nepal’s emerging Gen Z-led movement demanding transparency and accountability had reinforced the need for clean public life and responsible leadership. He said his resignation would ensure that any probes related to him could proceed without influence or interference. Also read: Not even a month in office, Nepal’s Balen Shah govt already facing protests Why Gurung resigned The controversy stems from Gurung’s reported shareholdings in companies linked to businessman Deepak Bhatta, who is currently under investigation in a money laundering case. Documents made public in recent days showed Gurung held shares in Star Micro Insurance and Liberty Micro Insurance, firms allegedly associated with Bhatta, according to The Kathmandu Post. In his statement, Gurung said he had taken seriously the public debate surrounding his financial disclosures and investments. He maintained that his assets had been declared and that owning shares in a company did not imply involvement with all associated individuals. He also noted that the probe into Bhatta is being handled by the Department of Money Laundering Investigation under the Finance Ministry, not the Home Ministry, rejecting suggestions of any institutional conflict, The Kathmandu Post reported. Also read: US Army nuke chief reveals sensitive information on Iran war in viral video Questions over his asset declaration intensified after reports suggested that investments of around 2.5 million Nepali rupees each in the two insurance firms were not separately disclosed. Gurung said these were included within a broader declaration of more than 27 million Nepali rupees in securities investments. Critics, however, raised concerns after it emerged that the companies were not publicly traded, prompting scrutiny over how the shares were categorised. Gurung had earlier denied wrongdoing and pledged cooperation with investigators. In a Facebook post earlier this week, he dismissed what he described as rumours and urged a distinction between allegations and verified facts. Political context The resignation comes at a politically sensitive time for Nepal, with the government led by Prime Minister Balendra Shah, popularly known as Balen Shah, facing protests over customs enforcement at the India-Nepal border and a reported move to delink student unions from political groups.

Nepal’s Home Minister Sudhan Gurung resigned on April 22 following scrutiny over alleged financial ties to a businessman under investigation for money laundering, citing the need to maintain public trust.

Nepal Home Minister Sudhan Gurung resigns over alleged links to businessman under probe

US President Donald Trump announced an open-ended ceasefire extension of US military strikes against Iran, despite no request for an extension, while maintaining economic and military pressure through a naval blockade. What does the shift intend to achieve?

War reset: Why United States extended Iran ceasefire without request?

US President Donald Trump has claimed that Iran’s government is “seriously fractured” amid the ongoing conflict involving the US and Israel, as he announced an extension of the ceasefire. He said Washington was allowing time for “their leaders and representatives” to reach a unified position, though he did not name specific figures in Tehran. However, developments within Iran suggest not a breakdown but a restructuring of power, with authority increasingly concentrated within a hardline military-security establishment. This shift is also being reflected in Tehran’s hesitation to proceed with a second round of talks.&nbsp;Following initial negotiations in Islamabad, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had said the Strait of Hormuz would remain “completely open” and indicated possible flexibility on issues such as nuclear enrichment and regional alliances.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-bound-ship-among-two-vessels-attacked-in-strait-of-hormuz-seized-by-iran-s-irgc-1776859709438">India-bound ship among two vessels attacked in Strait of Hormuz, seized by Iran's IRGC</a>&nbsp;That position was quickly reversed. The negotiating team was recalled to Tehran, and state-run media criticised Araghchi, saying his remarks had allowed Trump to “declare himself the winner”. Soon after, Iran’s armed forces announced the Strait had been closed again, citing the continued US naval blockade.<h2>Power shifting to security core</h2>This shows a tightly coordinated system centred around the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Supreme National Security Council, and politically connected security figures. At the centre of this structure is IRGC chief Ahmad Vahidi, supported by senior official Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr. Experts argue that Iran’s governance model does not reflect a simple divide between civilian and military leadership. Instead, diplomacy and military strategy are closely intertwined within a unified system dominated by security institutions.&nbsp;The IRGC, formed after Iran’s 1979 revolution, has evolved from a protective force into the country’s most powerful institution. It now operates as a military, intelligence network, and economic actor, with influence across Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen through allied groups.&nbsp;Its Basij force enforces domestic control, while the Quds Force oversees overseas operations. Analysts say years of sanctions and conflict have strengthened the IRGC, enabling it to build parallel structures that rival formal state institutions. As a result, Iran is increasingly described as a system where the military-security apparatus shapes policy, while civilian institutions implement it.<h2>Ahmad Vahidi’s rise</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-are-going-to-kill-him-us-army-nuke-chief-reveals-sensitive-information-on-iran-war-in-viral-video-1776852819813">US Army nuke chief reveals sensitive information on Iran war in viral video</a>&nbsp;At the centre of this shift is Vahidi, a founding member of the IRGC and former Quds Force commander, who has emerged as one of the most influential figures in Iran’s leadership. Elevated after his predecessor was killed early in the conflict, Vahidi is seen by analysts as representing the most hardline faction within the establishment. His influence extends beyond military operations into strategic decision-making, including ceasefire terms and escalation policies.&nbsp;He has played a key role in developing Iran’s network of allied militias across West Asia, which form a central pillar of Tehran’s regional strategy. Vahidi also remains under sanctions from the US, the European Union and Canada over alleged links to terrorism and nuclear activities.

Ahmad Vahidi is the Commander-in-Chief of the IRGC, a hardline veteran and former Quds Force leader who now centralises Iran’s military-security strategy, increasingly overshadowing civilian diplomacy.

US President Donald Trump has claimed that Iran’s government is “seriously fractured” amid the ongoing conflict involving the US and Israel, as he announced an extension of the ceasefire. He said Washington was allowing time for “their leaders and representatives” to reach a unified position, though he did not name specific figures in Tehran. However, developments within Iran suggest not a breakdown but a restructuring of power, with authority increasingly concentrated within a hardline military-security establishment. This shift is also being reflected in Tehran’s hesitation to proceed with a second round of talks. Following initial negotiations in Islamabad, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had said the Strait of Hormuz would remain “completely open” and indicated possible flexibility on issues such as nuclear enrichment and regional alliances. Also read: India-bound ship among two vessels attacked in Strait of Hormuz, seized by Iran's IRGC That position was quickly reversed. The negotiating team was recalled to Tehran, and state-run media criticised Araghchi, saying his remarks had allowed Trump to “declare himself the winner”. Soon after, Iran’s armed forces announced the Strait had been closed again, citing the continued US naval blockade. Power shifting to security core This shows a tightly coordinated system centred around the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Supreme National Security Council, and politically connected security figures. At the centre of this structure is IRGC chief Ahmad Vahidi, supported by senior official Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr. Experts argue that Iran’s governance model does not reflect a simple divide between civilian and military leadership. Instead, diplomacy and military strategy are closely intertwined within a unified system dominated by security institutions. The IRGC, formed after Iran’s 1979 revolution, has evolved from a protective force into the country’s most powerful institution. It now operates as a military, intelligence network, and economic actor, with influence across Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen through allied groups. Its Basij force enforces domestic control, while the Quds Force oversees overseas operations. Analysts say years of sanctions and conflict have strengthened the IRGC, enabling it to build parallel structures that rival formal state institutions. As a result, Iran is increasingly described as a system where the military-security apparatus shapes policy, while civilian institutions implement it. Ahmad Vahidi’s rise Also read: US Army nuke chief reveals sensitive information on Iran war in viral video At the centre of this shift is Vahidi, a founding member of the IRGC and former Quds Force commander, who has emerged as one of the most influential figures in Iran’s leadership. Elevated after his predecessor was killed early in the conflict, Vahidi is seen by analysts as representing the most hardline faction within the establishment. His influence extends beyond military operations into strategic decision-making, including ceasefire terms and escalation policies. He has played a key role in developing Iran’s network of allied militias across West Asia, which form a central pillar of Tehran’s regional strategy. Vahidi also remains under sanctions from the US, the European Union and Canada over alleged links to terrorism and nuclear activities.

Ahmad Vahidi is the Commander-in-Chief of the IRGC, a hardline veteran and former Quds Force leader who now centralises Iran’s military-security strategy, increasingly overshadowing civilian diplomacy.

Who is Ahmad Vahidi? Is IRGC chief shaping Iran’s war decisions? Here’s what we know

Iran's Revolutionary Guards attacked and seized two vessels, including a Gujarat-bound cargo ship, on Wednesday, hours after US President Donald Trump extended the two-week fragile ceasefire. The two ships, Panama-flagged MSC Francesca and Liberia-flagged Epaminodes, are now in IRGC custody and have been taken to Iran, reported Iranian state television. A third vessel, Greek-owned Euphoria, was also targeted and is now stranded along Iran’s shores.&nbsp;The incident is likely to spike tensions between Iran and India after two India-flagged ships were attacked last week in the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Maritime traffic data shows that Epaminondas was headed towards Mundra port in Gujarat and was coming from Dubai.&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Vessels did not have ‘required authorisation, manipulated navigation systems’: Iranian navy</h2>&nbsp;The Iranian navy claimed that the vessels did not have “required authorisation” and “manipulated navigation systems”, thereby endangering maritime safety.&nbsp;Earlier, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said three merchant ships came under fire in the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, and one of the ships suffered damage to its bridge (the central command centre) after being hit by gunfire and rocket-propelled grenades.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Iranian gunboat did not warn before firing at ship: UKMTO&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;UKMTO said that Iran’s IRGC attacked the first container ship around 7.55 am, damaging the vessel. It said the Iranian gunboat did not warn the ship before it started firing at it.&nbsp;“The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps naval force this morning identified and stopped in the Strait of Hormuz two violating ships,” the IRGC said, adding that MSC Francesca belonged to the “Zionist regime” and Epaminodes was “tampering with navigation systems and jeopardising maritime security”.&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>‘Disrupting order and safety in Strait of Hormuz is red line for Iran’</h2>&nbsp;The IRGC Navy said that disrupting order and safety in the Strait of Hormuz is a red line for Iran.&nbsp;Iran’s new offensive in Hormuz is being seen as a reaction to the seizure of two Iranian-flagged cargo ships near the Gulf of Oman by the US as part of its naval blockade.The US blockade of ships and Iranian ports has irked Tehran, which is now insisting on blockade removal before any peace talks. However, Trump made it clear that the naval blockade would continue. It is designed to strangle Iran’s oil revenues and collapse its economy.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said three merchant ships came under fire in the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, and one of the ships suffered damage to its bridge (the central command centre) after being hit by gunfire and rocket-propelled grenades.

Iran's Revolutionary Guards attacked and seized two vessels, including a Gujarat-bound cargo ship, on Wednesday, hours after US President Donald Trump extended the two-week fragile ceasefire. The two ships, Panama-flagged MSC Francesca and Liberia-flagged Epaminodes, are now in IRGC custody and have been taken to Iran, reported Iranian state television. A third vessel, Greek-owned Euphoria, was also targeted and is now stranded along Iran’s shores. The incident is likely to spike tensions between Iran and India after two India-flagged ships were attacked last week in the Strait of Hormuz. Maritime traffic data shows that Epaminondas was headed towards Mundra port in Gujarat and was coming from Dubai. Vessels did not have ‘required authorisation, manipulated navigation systems’: Iranian navy The Iranian navy claimed that the vessels did not have “required authorisation” and “manipulated navigation systems”, thereby endangering maritime safety. Earlier, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said three merchant ships came under fire in the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, and one of the ships suffered damage to its bridge (the central command centre) after being hit by gunfire and rocket-propelled grenades. Iranian gunboat did not warn before firing at ship: UKMTO UKMTO said that Iran’s IRGC attacked the first container ship around 7.55 am, damaging the vessel. It said the Iranian gunboat did not warn the ship before it started firing at it. “The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps naval force this morning identified and stopped in the Strait of Hormuz two violating ships,” the IRGC said, adding that MSC Francesca belonged to the “Zionist regime” and Epaminodes was “tampering with navigation systems and jeopardising maritime security”. ‘Disrupting order and safety in Strait of Hormuz is red line for Iran’ The IRGC Navy said that disrupting order and safety in the Strait of Hormuz is a red line for Iran. Iran’s new offensive in Hormuz is being seen as a reaction to the seizure of two Iranian-flagged cargo ships near the Gulf of Oman by the US as part of its naval blockade. The US blockade of ships and Iranian ports has irked Tehran, which is now insisting on blockade removal before any peace talks. However, Trump made it clear that the naval blockade would continue. It is designed to strangle Iran’s oil revenues and collapse its economy.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said three merchant ships came under fire in the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, and one of the ships suffered damage to its bridge (the central command centre) after being hit by gunfire and rocket-propelled grenades.

India-bound ship among two vessels attacked in Strait of Hormuz, seized by Iran's IRGC

The diplomatic corridors of Pakistan’s capital are thick with anticipation and growing unease today, as the second round of high-stakes peace talks between the United States and Iran remains in a precarious limbo. With a critical ceasefire set to expire at 4:50 AM PST on Wednesday (Apr 22), Islamabad finds itself racing against a ticking clock to prevent a return to active hostilities. The city, which has undergone a "dazzling reinvention" as a neutral mediator in the 2026 conflict, is fully prepared to host the delegations. However, the planned arrival of US Vice President JD Vance was abruptly put on hold by the White House late Tuesday (Apr 21). This move followed a series of maritime escalations, including the US seizure of the Iranian-flagged cargo ship Touska in the Sea of Oman, an act Tehran has branded as "piracy" and a flagrant breach of the existing truce.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-irgc-hit-three-ships-in-strait-of-hormuz-after-ceasefire-extended-1776857377193/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-irgc-hit-three-ships-in-strait-of-hormuz-after-ceasefire-extended-1776857377193/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;While US President Donald Trump announced an indefinite extension of the ceasefire on Tuesday (Apr 21), the gesture has been met with deep scepticism in Tehran. Iranian officials, including advisors to top negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, have dismissed the extension as a "ploy to buy time" for a surprise military strike. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi further complicated the diplomatic path, stating that Iran would not negotiate "under the shadow of threats" while its ports remain under a US naval blockade.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/irgc-gunboat-fires-on-container-ship-near-oman-heavy-damage-reported-amid-strait-of-hormuz-standoff-1776845119527">IRGC gunboat fires on container ship near Oman: Heavy damage reported</a>&nbsp;For Pakistan, the stakes could not be higher. As a nation sharing a 900-kilometre border with Iran and grappling with a severe domestic energy crisis exacerbated by the Strait of Hormuz blockade, stability is a mechanical necessity. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has engaged in relentless shuttle diplomacy, framing Islamabad as the only bridge capable of housing both Washington’s demands and Tehran’s "strategic familiarity".&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-uae-bailout-currency-swap-iran-missiles-dollar-impact-1776836558371">Donald Trump considers UAE bailout says he is shocked 'they are really rich'</a>&nbsp;Information Minister Attaullah Tarar confirmed that while Pakistan remains in constant contact with Iranian leadership, a formal confirmation of their participation in the Islamabad round is "still awaited". The atmosphere in the "Red Zone" remains sombre. If the talks collapse, the region faces the grim prospect of what IRGC commanders have termed "new cards on the battlefield", including threats to the broader West Asia oil infrastructure. For now, Islamabad remains a stage set for a play that may never begin, holding its breath as the sun sets on the final hours of a fragile peace.

Islamabad's diplomatic balancing act: Pakistan awaits a breakthrough in US-Iran peace talks as the 2026 ceasefire deadline looms and maritime tensions in the Sea of Oman escalate.

The diplomatic corridors of Pakistan’s capital are thick with anticipation and growing unease today, as the second round of high-stakes peace talks between the United States and Iran remains in a precarious limbo. With a critical ceasefire set to expire at 4:50 AM PST on Wednesday (Apr 22), Islamabad finds itself racing against a ticking clock to prevent a return to active hostilities. The city, which has undergone a "dazzling reinvention" as a neutral mediator in the 2026 conflict, is fully prepared to host the delegations. However, the planned arrival of US Vice President JD Vance was abruptly put on hold by the White House late Tuesday (Apr 21). This move followed a series of maritime escalations, including the US seizure of the Iranian-flagged cargo ship Touska in the Sea of Oman, an act Tehran has branded as "piracy" and a flagrant breach of the existing truce. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-irgc-hit-three-ships-in-strait-of-hormuz-after-ceasefire-extended-1776857377193/embed While US President Donald Trump announced an indefinite extension of the ceasefire on Tuesday (Apr 21), the gesture has been met with deep scepticism in Tehran. Iranian officials, including advisors to top negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, have dismissed the extension as a "ploy to buy time" for a surprise military strike. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi further complicated the diplomatic path, stating that Iran would not negotiate "under the shadow of threats" while its ports remain under a US naval blockade. Also read: IRGC gunboat fires on container ship near Oman: Heavy damage reported For Pakistan, the stakes could not be higher. As a nation sharing a 900-kilometre border with Iran and grappling with a severe domestic energy crisis exacerbated by the Strait of Hormuz blockade, stability is a mechanical necessity. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has engaged in relentless shuttle diplomacy, framing Islamabad as the only bridge capable of housing both Washington’s demands and Tehran’s "strategic familiarity". Also read: Donald Trump considers UAE bailout says he is shocked 'they are really rich' Information Minister Attaullah Tarar confirmed that while Pakistan remains in constant contact with Iranian leadership, a formal confirmation of their participation in the Islamabad round is "still awaited". The atmosphere in the "Red Zone" remains sombre. If the talks collapse, the region faces the grim prospect of what IRGC commanders have termed "new cards on the battlefield", including threats to the broader West Asia oil infrastructure. For now, Islamabad remains a stage set for a play that may never begin, holding its breath as the sun sets on the final hours of a fragile peace.

Islamabad's diplomatic balancing act: Pakistan awaits a breakthrough in US-Iran peace talks as the 2026 ceasefire deadline looms and maritime tensions in the Sea of Oman escalate.

Islamabad in limbo: Mediation efforts stutter as US-Iran ceasefire deadline looms

The disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has exposed the structural limits of global energy routing from the Middle East. As the world’s most critical oil chokepoint, any interruption immediately reverberates through supply chains. The International Energy Agency (IEA) described the current situation as “the largest supply disruption on record,” exceeding the combined impact of the 1970s oil shocks and post-Ukraine gas losses. The Strait’s instability, linked to the US–Israeli war with Iran, has revived scrutiny of alternative export corridors that remain fragmented and incomplete.&nbsp;<h2>Geopolitical pressure and conflicting claims</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>The crisis has unfolded alongside heightened political exchanges. US President Donald Trump claimed on Truth Social that “Iran doesn’t want the Strait of Hormuz closed, they want it open so they can make $500 Million Dollars a day,” adding that “they merely want to ‘save face’.” He also stated, “People approached me four days ago… saying, ‘Sir, Iran wants to open up the Strait, immediately.’” These remarks underline how energy flows remain tightly bound to diplomatic signalling.&nbsp;ALSO READ:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-nearly-8-000-dead-or-missing-un-data-exposes-scale-of-migrant-deaths-in-2025-europe-s-sea-routes-most-deadly-1776854608029"> ‘Nearly 8,000 dead or missing’: UN data exposes scale of migrant deaths in 2025, Europe’s sea routes most deadly</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Existing bypass infrastructure</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>East-West Pipeline (Saudi Arabia)Saudi Arabia’s East–West pipeline is the region’s largest alternative, stretching 1,200 kilometres to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. It can move up to 7 million barrels per day, though effective exports are closer to 4.5 million bpd. From Yanbu, cargoes move via the Suez Canal or the Bab el-Mandeb strait, where Houthi attacks have raised persistent risk.&nbsp;Habshan-Fujairah Pipeline (UAE) The UAE’s Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline links Habshan to Fujairah in the Gulf of Oman, with capacity of 1.5–1.8 million bpd. However, 'oil loadings at Fujairah… have been affected by drone attacks since the Iran war started at the end of February,' according to Reuters.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-stockpiles-running-dry-heavy-use-in-iran-war-pushes-thaad-patriot-and-tomahawk-reserves-to-the-brink-1776845964670">US Stockpiles running dry? Heavy use in Iran war pushes THAAD, Patriot and Tomahawk reserves to the brink</a>&nbsp;<h2> Partial and emerging routes</h2>&nbsp;&nbsp;Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline (Iraq-Turkey) Iraq’s Kirkuk–Ceyhan pipeline has resumed flows after a 2½-year halt, reaching 170,000 bpd with plans for 250,000 bpd.&nbsp;Goreh-Jask pipelineIran’s Goreh–Jask pipeline, designed for 1 million bpd, offers limited bypass potential, though the IEA notes the Jask terminal remains incomplete despite a 2024 test loading.&nbsp;<h2>Long-term proposals and constraints</h2>&nbsp;Proposed alternatives, including the Iraq–Oman pipeline to Duqm and the Iraq–Jordan pipeline to Aqaba, remain largely stalled despite being first conceived in the 1980s and approved in principle in 2022. Both continue to face major obstacles, including high costs, security concerns, and political uncertainty. Separately, plans for a Gulf–Sea of Oman canal bypassing the Strait of Hormuz remain purely theoretical, with estimates running into hundreds of billions of dollars and significant engineering difficulties, including the need to cut through the Hajar Mountains toward Fujairah.&nbsp;Despite multiple corridors, no single alternative replicates Hormuz’s scale, leaving global energy security structurally exposed.

The Strait’s instability, linked to the US–Israeli war with Iran, has revived scrutiny of alternative export corridors that remain fragmented and incomplete.

The disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has exposed the structural limits of global energy routing from the Middle East. As the world’s most critical oil chokepoint, any interruption immediately reverberates through supply chains. The International Energy Agency (IEA) described the current situation as “the largest supply disruption on record,” exceeding the combined impact of the 1970s oil shocks and post-Ukraine gas losses. The Strait’s instability, linked to the US–Israeli war with Iran, has revived scrutiny of alternative export corridors that remain fragmented and incomplete. Geopolitical pressure and conflicting claims The crisis has unfolded alongside heightened political exchanges. US President Donald Trump claimed on Truth Social that “Iran doesn’t want the Strait of Hormuz closed, they want it open so they can make $500 Million Dollars a day,” adding that “they merely want to ‘save face’.” He also stated, “People approached me four days ago… saying, ‘Sir, Iran wants to open up the Strait, immediately.’” These remarks underline how energy flows remain tightly bound to diplomatic signalling. ALSO READ: ‘Nearly 8,000 dead or missing’: UN data exposes scale of migrant deaths in 2025, Europe’s sea routes most deadly Existing bypass infrastructure East-West Pipeline (Saudi Arabia) Saudi Arabia’s East–West pipeline is the region’s largest alternative, stretching 1,200 kilometres to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. It can move up to 7 million barrels per day, though effective exports are closer to 4.5 million bpd. From Yanbu, cargoes move via the Suez Canal or the Bab el-Mandeb strait, where Houthi attacks have raised persistent risk. Habshan-Fujairah Pipeline (UAE) The UAE’s Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline links Habshan to Fujairah in the Gulf of Oman, with capacity of 1.5–1.8 million bpd. However, 'oil loadings at Fujairah… have been affected by drone attacks since the Iran war started at the end of February,' according to Reuters. ALSO READ: US Stockpiles running dry? Heavy use in Iran war pushes THAAD, Patriot and Tomahawk reserves to the brink Partial and emerging routes Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline (Iraq-Turkey) Iraq’s Kirkuk–Ceyhan pipeline has resumed flows after a 2½-year halt, reaching 170,000 bpd with plans for 250,000 bpd. Goreh-Jask pipeline Iran’s Goreh–Jask pipeline, designed for 1 million bpd, offers limited bypass potential, though the IEA notes the Jask terminal remains incomplete despite a 2024 test loading. Long-term proposals and constraints Proposed alternatives, including the Iraq–Oman pipeline to Duqm and the Iraq–Jordan pipeline to Aqaba, remain largely stalled despite being first conceived in the 1980s and approved in principle in 2022. Both continue to face major obstacles, including high costs, security concerns, and political uncertainty. Separately, plans for a Gulf–Sea of Oman canal bypassing the Strait of Hormuz remain purely theoretical, with estimates running into hundreds of billions of dollars and significant engineering difficulties, including the need to cut through the Hajar Mountains toward Fujairah. Despite multiple corridors, no single alternative replicates Hormuz’s scale, leaving global energy security structurally exposed.

The Strait’s instability, linked to the US–Israeli war with Iran, has revived scrutiny of alternative export corridors that remain fragmented and incomplete.

With Hormuz disrupted, what are the alternative routes for Middle East oil and gas exports—and are they enough?

Public anger is mounting in Nepal against the government led by Balen Shah, less than a month after it assumed office with a two-thirds majority, as protests intensify across the country over a series of contentious decisions. Demonstrations have spread from the streets of Kathmandu to Singha Durbar, the country’s administrative nerve centre, with students, political groups and ordinary citizens joining rallies in growing numbers. Protesters have also gathered in other major cities, signalling widening unrest.&nbsp;One of the key triggers for the protests is the government’s decision to impose a mandatory customs duty on goods worth over ₹100 brought in from India. Residents in Nepal’s border regions have criticised the move, saying it directly affects their daily lives as they depend heavily on cross-border purchases for essential goods. Demonstrators argue that the policy imposes an additional financial burden on ordinary citizens and fails to reflect the realities of border communities.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/global-refinery-fires-sabotage-energy-crisis-oil-supply-1776848760096">From India to Australia: Why are oil refineries across the globe burning simultaneously?</a>&nbsp;The unrest has been further fuelled by a row over student unions, with the government accused of rejecting or sidelining unions affiliated with political parties. Student leaders have alleged that authorities have adopted a repressive approach instead of engaging in dialogue, prompting a strong backlash from the youth.&nbsp;Thousands of students have taken part in protests nationwide, many of them from schools and colleges. Visuals from demonstrations show students in uniform holding placards and raising slogans against government policies, underlining how the agitation has spread beyond political circles into wider society.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/singapore-hormuz-dry-run-us-china-conflict-balakrishnan-1776843695292">Singapore warns Hormuz crisis was a 'dry run' for US-China conflict</a>&nbsp;Calls are also growing for the resignation of Home Minister Sudan Gurung, who is facing allegations of possessing disproportionate assets and engaging in questionable financial dealings. Protesters and opposition groups have accused Gurung of links to suspicious business transactions, including alleged connections to individuals implicated in financial crimes.&nbsp;According to multiple media reports in Nepal, documents point to investments and shareholdings linked to controversial entities, intensifying demands for his resignation on moral grounds. Political parties and civil society groups have continued to stage demonstrations over the issue, making it a central focus of the ongoing protests.

Less than a month in, Balen Shah’s government faces nationwide protests over border customs duties, the sidelining of student unions, and corruption allegations involving Home Minister Sudan Gurung’s assets.

Public anger is mounting in Nepal against the government led by Balen Shah, less than a month after it assumed office with a two-thirds majority, as protests intensify across the country over a series of contentious decisions. Demonstrations have spread from the streets of Kathmandu to Singha Durbar, the country’s administrative nerve centre, with students, political groups and ordinary citizens joining rallies in growing numbers. Protesters have also gathered in other major cities, signalling widening unrest. One of the key triggers for the protests is the government’s decision to impose a mandatory customs duty on goods worth over ₹100 brought in from India. Residents in Nepal’s border regions have criticised the move, saying it directly affects their daily lives as they depend heavily on cross-border purchases for essential goods. Demonstrators argue that the policy imposes an additional financial burden on ordinary citizens and fails to reflect the realities of border communities. Also read: From India to Australia: Why are oil refineries across the globe burning simultaneously? The unrest has been further fuelled by a row over student unions, with the government accused of rejecting or sidelining unions affiliated with political parties. Student leaders have alleged that authorities have adopted a repressive approach instead of engaging in dialogue, prompting a strong backlash from the youth. Thousands of students have taken part in protests nationwide, many of them from schools and colleges. Visuals from demonstrations show students in uniform holding placards and raising slogans against government policies, underlining how the agitation has spread beyond political circles into wider society. Also read: Singapore warns Hormuz crisis was a 'dry run' for US-China conflict Calls are also growing for the resignation of Home Minister Sudan Gurung, who is facing allegations of possessing disproportionate assets and engaging in questionable financial dealings. Protesters and opposition groups have accused Gurung of links to suspicious business transactions, including alleged connections to individuals implicated in financial crimes. According to multiple media reports in Nepal, documents point to investments and shareholdings linked to controversial entities, intensifying demands for his resignation on moral grounds. Political parties and civil society groups have continued to stage demonstrations over the issue, making it a central focus of the ongoing protests.

Less than a month in, Balen Shah’s government faces nationwide protests over border customs duties, the sidelining of student unions, and corruption allegations involving Home Minister Sudan Gurung’s assets.

Not even a month in office, Nepal’s Balen Shah govt already facing protests - Here’s why

Over the span of the last 45 days since the start of the war, around 45+ cases of fire have been reported across the globe in oil refineries or power plants. This is a rough 1800 per cent jump from sporadic 9-10 fires usually reported in a year. 

From India to Australia: Why are oil refineries across the globe burning simultaneously?

A senior US Army official has been placed under investigation after a viral video appeared to show him discussing sensitive military and national security matters in a public setting. The footage, shared by conservative activist James O’Keefe, allegedly captures Andrew Hugg, the US Army’s Chief of Chemical and Nuclear Surety, speaking candidly to a woman in a restaurant. The conversation, reportedly recorded by a hidden camera, has raised concerns over operational security and the handling of classified information.<h2>Here are the details from the video</h2>In the video, Hugg is heard making a series of controversial claims relating to US military operations and capabilities. He allegedly stated that the US still possesses nerve agents and referred to the death of a US Army chemist following exposure to such a substance.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">BREAKING NEWS: Top U.S. Nuclear Chief Caught LEAKING Sensitive National Security Information to Stranger, Reveals Army Chemist Was Exposed to U.S. Chemical Nerve Agent, Confirms U.S. Strike Killed Children in Iran, Discloses U.S. Plans to ‘Kill Iran’s New Supreme Leader’ “If he… <a href="https://t.co/owL1YGUnms">pic.twitter.com/owL1YGUnms</a>&mdash; James O&#39;Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) <a href="https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/2046642621632872461?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 21, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He also spoke about US airstrikes in Iran, claiming that children were killed at a school in Minab, which he described as “collateral damage”. Additionally, Hugg appeared to outline how nuclear launch decisions are made in real time, touching on highly sensitive military procedures.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-nearly-8-000-dead-or-missing-un-data-exposes-scale-of-migrant-deaths-in-2025-europe-s-sea-routes-most-deadly-1776854608029">‘Nearly 8,000 dead or missing’: UN data exposes scale of migrant deaths in 2025, Europe’s sea routes most deadly</a>&nbsp;The video further shows him making remarks about Iran’s leadership. Hugg reportedly suggested that the US could target Mojtaba Khamenei, the new Supreme Leader of Iran, if he “doesn’t change his ways”. “If he doesn’t change his ways, yeah, they’re going to kill him,” Hugg is heard saying in the footage. At the same time, he emphasised that the US did not intend to deploy nuclear weapons, stating, “We’re not going to nuke anybody.”<h2>Concerns over security</h2>The informal setting of the exchange has raised additional alarm. The conversation took place in a public restaurant, where Hugg appeared to believe he was speaking to a private individual. During the interaction, he also made personal remarks and spoke about intelligence-gathering tactics, suggesting that sending a “pretty girl” could be an effective way to obtain information. “The easiest way to get intelligence… send a pretty girl,” he said, adding comments about being “mesmerised”.

US Army official Andrew Hugg is under investigation after a viral undercover video allegedly showed him disclosing classified details regarding nerve agents, Iranian airstrikes, and potential high-level assassinations.

A senior US Army official has been placed under investigation after a viral video appeared to show him discussing sensitive military and national security matters in a public setting. The footage, shared by conservative activist James O’Keefe, allegedly captures Andrew Hugg, the US Army’s Chief of Chemical and Nuclear Surety, speaking candidly to a woman in a restaurant. The conversation, reportedly recorded by a hidden camera, has raised concerns over operational security and the handling of classified information. Here are the details from the video In the video, Hugg is heard making a series of controversial claims relating to US military operations and capabilities. He allegedly stated that the US still possesses nerve agents and referred to the death of a US Army chemist following exposure to such a substance.

US Army official Andrew Hugg is under investigation after a viral undercover video allegedly showed him disclosing classified details regarding nerve agents, Iranian airstrikes, and potential high-level assassinations.

‘They are going to kill him’: US Army nuke chief reveals sensitive information on Iran war in viral video

Nearly 8,000 people died or disappeared while migrating in 2025, according to new data from the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The agency reported 7,904 fatalities and missing persons globally, taking the total since 2014 to more than 82,000. It warned that around 340,000 family members have been directly affected by these losses. The sea routes to ​Europe were most deadly and many victims lost ‌in "invisible shipwrecks", a UN agency said on Tuesday. The IOM described the figures as evidence of “our collective failure to prevent these tragedies,” Maria Moita, head of the organisation’s humanitarian and response department, said at a Geneva press briefing, according to Reuters.&nbsp;<h2>Europe sea routes account for highest share of deaths</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>More than four in every ten recorded deaths or disappearances occurred on sea routes towards Europe. The IOM highlighted the continued danger of so-called ‘invisible shipwrecks’, in which entire boats sink or vanish without trace, leaving no bodies or survivors.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-stockpiles-running-dry-heavy-use-in-iran-war-pushes-thaad-patriot-and-tomahawk-reserves-to-the-brink-1776845964670">US Stockpiles running dry? Heavy use in Iran war pushes THAAD, Patriot and Tomahawk reserves to the brink</a>&nbsp;Although the overall toll was lower than the 9,197 deaths recorded in 2024, the agency said the reduction was partly due to around 1,500 suspected cases that could not be verified because of aid and monitoring gaps. This, it added, means the real figure may be higher.&nbsp;<h2>Shifting routes, persistent risks</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>Data drawn from the IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) and Missing Migrants Project (MMP) shows that migration routes are shifting rather than easing. The DTM tracks movement patterns and changing corridors, while the MMP compiles deaths and disappearances using official records, media reports and field data.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/japan-goes-global-on-arms-is-tokyo-planning-to-become-a-weapons-export-giant-while-us-war-machine-runs-thin-1776766253208">Japan goes global on arms: Is Tokyo planning to become a weapons export giant while US war machine runs thin?</a>&nbsp;The West African route towards the Canary Islands accounted for around 1,200 deaths. In Asia, fatalities reached a record level, including hundreds of Rohingya refugees fleeing violence in Myanmar and precarious conditions in Bangladesh’s camps.&nbsp;According to Reuters, IOM Director General Amy Pope said in a statement: “Routes are shifting in response to conflict, climate pressures and policy changes, but the risks are still very real.” She added, “Behind these numbers are people taking dangerous journeys and families left waiting for news that may never come.”&nbsp;Despite regional variations in arrivals, the report concludes that migration remains highly dangerous, with changing routes often exposing people to even greater risks at sea and across remote land corridors.

Although the overall toll was lower than the 9,197 deaths recorded in 2024, the agency said the reduction was partly due to around 1,500 suspected cases that could not be verified because of aid and monitoring gaps.

Nearly 8,000 people died or disappeared while migrating in 2025, according to new data from the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The agency reported 7,904 fatalities and missing persons globally, taking the total since 2014 to more than 82,000. It warned that around 340,000 family members have been directly affected by these losses. The sea routes to Europe were most deadly and many victims lost ‌in "invisible shipwrecks", a UN agency said on Tuesday. The IOM described the figures as evidence of “our collective failure to prevent these tragedies,” Maria Moita, head of the organisation’s humanitarian and response department, said at a Geneva press briefing, according to Reuters. Europe sea routes account for highest share of deaths More than four in every ten recorded deaths or disappearances occurred on sea routes towards Europe. The IOM highlighted the continued danger of so-called ‘invisible shipwrecks’, in which entire boats sink or vanish without trace, leaving no bodies or survivors. ALSO READ: US Stockpiles running dry? Heavy use in Iran war pushes THAAD, Patriot and Tomahawk reserves to the brink Although the overall toll was lower than the 9,197 deaths recorded in 2024, the agency said the reduction was partly due to around 1,500 suspected cases that could not be verified because of aid and monitoring gaps. This, it added, means the real figure may be higher. Shifting routes, persistent risks Data drawn from the IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) and Missing Migrants Project (MMP) shows that migration routes are shifting rather than easing. The DTM tracks movement patterns and changing corridors, while the MMP compiles deaths and disappearances using official records, media reports and field data. ALSO READ: Japan goes global on arms: Is Tokyo planning to become a weapons export giant while US war machine runs thin? The West African route towards the Canary Islands accounted for around 1,200 deaths. In Asia, fatalities reached a record level, including hundreds of Rohingya refugees fleeing violence in Myanmar and precarious conditions in Bangladesh’s camps. According to Reuters, IOM Director General Amy Pope said in a statement: “Routes are shifting in response to conflict, climate pressures and policy changes, but the risks are still very real.” She added, “Behind these numbers are people taking dangerous journeys and families left waiting for news that may never come.” Despite regional variations in arrivals, the report concludes that migration remains highly dangerous, with changing routes often exposing people to even greater risks at sea and across remote land corridors.

Although the overall toll was lower than the 9,197 deaths recorded in 2024, the agency said the reduction was partly due to around 1,500 suspected cases that could not be verified because of aid and monitoring gaps.

‘Nearly 8,000 dead or missing’: UN data exposes scale of migrant deaths in 2025, Europe’s sea routes most deadly

Tamil Nadu will go to polls on April 23 in a single-phase election to decide the next government for its 234-seat Assembly, with results set to be declared on May 4. The state is currently governed by MK Stalin-led Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), which holds a dominant majority. The contest is expected to be triangular, with Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) trying to expand its footprint and actor-turned-politician Vijay entering the fray with his party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-will-win-assam-elections-will-bjp-s-himanta-biswa-sarma-become-cm-again-here-s-what-pre-poll-surveys-predict-1775550087343">Who will win Assam Elections? Will BJP’s Himanta Biswa Sarma become CM again? Here's what pre-poll surveys predict</a><h2>Key Seats in Tamil Nadu</h2><h3>Edappadi</h3>The Edappadi seat remains a traditional bastion of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and is currently represented by party leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami. This constituency is crucial for AIADMK’s hopes of staging a political comeback in the state.<h3>Tiruchirappalli East</h3>In Tiruchirappalli East, Vijay is making his electoral debut, taking on sitting DMK MLA Inigo Irudayaraj, while AIADMK’s K. Rajasekaran is also in the contest. With Vijay also contesting from Perambur, this seat has emerged as one of the most closely watched battles.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/west-bengal-elections-2026-from-suvendu-adhikari-to-humayun-kabir-a-look-at-key-faces-and-seats-in-phase-1-1776668622628">West Bengal Elections 2026: From Suvendu Adhikari to Humayun Kabir - A look at key faces and seats in Phase 1</a><h3>Kolathur</h3>Chief Minister M. K. Stalin is seeking re-election from Kolathur, a seat he has held since 2011. A DMK stronghold, Kolathur is seen as a safe seat but remains symbolically significant for the party’s leadership.<h3>Dr. Radhakrishnan Nagar</h3>Once represented by former Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa, Dr Radhakrishnan Nagar has seen shifting political dynamics. Currently held by DMK’s J John Ebenezer, the seat gained prominence after TTV Dhinakaran won it as an independent in a high-profile bypoll.<h3>Coimbatore South</h3>Coimbatore South is set for a direct contest between DMK’s V Senthilbalaji and AIADMK’s Amman K Arjunan. The constituency is considered a key battleground in western Tamil Nadu.<h2>Seeman</h2>Seeman, the chief coordinator of Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK), has fielded candidates in all 234 constituencies across Tamil Nadu and will contest from the Karaikudi seat. Known for maintaining an independent political stance, Seeman has steadily strengthened his party’s presence with each election, choosing not to form alliances with other parties.<h2>Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni</h2>Udhayanidhi Stalin, representing the next generation of leadership in the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, is contesting from Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni. A prominent campaigner, he has positioned himself as a youth-centric leader who combines political outreach with cultural engagement, making his performance crucial for the party’s future leadership narrative.<h2>Mylapore</h2>Senior BJP leader Tamilisai Soundararajan is contesting from Mylapore. A former governor, her candidature highlights the BJP’s strategy to strengthen its presence in urban constituencies by fielding well-known leaders and projecting itself as a governance-driven alternative to the DMK.<h2>Coimbatore&nbsp;</h2>Vanathi Srinivasan continues to be one of the BJP’s key figures in the Coimbatore region. With a strong organisational background and prior electoral success, she is expected to play a significant role both as a candidate and as a strategist in expanding the party’s base in western Tamil Nadu.<h2>Avinashi</h2>Union Minister L Murugan is contesting from Avinashi. As a prominent Dalit face of the BJP, his candidature reflects the party’s efforts to broaden its social outreach and build support among marginalised communities beyond its traditional urban strongholds.<h3>Other key constituencies to watch</h3>Several prominent leaders are expected to retain their seats, including SP Velumani from Thondamuthur and P. Thangamani from Kumarapalayam. On the DMK side, heavyweights such as Thangam Thenarasu (Tiruchuli), KN Nehru (Tiruchy-West), EV Velu (Tiruvannamalai), Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi (Tiruverumbur), and S Muthusamy (Erode-West) are also in focus as the state heads into a crucial electoral battle.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-this-time-elections-in-wb-would-surely-be-ec-issues-stern-warning-to-tmc-ahead-of-bengal-polls-1775649104049">'This time, elections in WB would surely be...': EC issues stern warning to TMC ahead of Bengal polls</a><h2>Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections</h2>Tamil Nadu will hold its Assembly elections on its 234 seats in a single phase on April 23, with the counting of votes scheduled for May 4. The current 16th Legislative Assembly is set to complete its five-year term on May 10, 2026. As per the election schedule, candidates can submit their nominations until April 6, after which scrutiny will take place on April 7. The deadline for withdrawal of nominations is April 9. The state has an electorate of over 5.67 crore voters, comprising a large number of young voters as well as persons with disabilities and senior citizens. The Secular Progressive Alliance (SPA), led by the DMK, won the election, ending a decade-long rule by the AIADMK in last elections.

Tamil Nadu heads to Assembly elections on April 23 with results on May 4. The DMK faces a triangular contest from BJP and Vijay’s TVK. Key seats include Kolathur, Coimbatore South, and Tiruchirappalli East, making the election crucial for the state’s political future.

Tamil Nadu will go to polls on April 23 in a single-phase election to decide the next government for its 234-seat Assembly, with results set to be declared on May 4. The state is currently governed by MK Stalin-led Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), which holds a dominant majority. The contest is expected to be triangular, with Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) trying to expand its footprint and actor-turned-politician Vijay entering the fray with his party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam. Also Read: Who will win Assam Elections? Will BJP’s Himanta Biswa Sarma become CM again? Here's what pre-poll surveys predict Key Seats in Tamil Nadu Edappadi The Edappadi seat remains a traditional bastion of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and is currently represented by party leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami. This constituency is crucial for AIADMK’s hopes of staging a political comeback in the state. Tiruchirappalli East In Tiruchirappalli East, Vijay is making his electoral debut, taking on sitting DMK MLA Inigo Irudayaraj, while AIADMK’s K. Rajasekaran is also in the contest. With Vijay also contesting from Perambur, this seat has emerged as one of the most closely watched battles. Also Read: West Bengal Elections 2026: From Suvendu Adhikari to Humayun Kabir - A look at key faces and seats in Phase 1 Kolathur Chief Minister M. K. Stalin is seeking re-election from Kolathur, a seat he has held since 2011. A DMK stronghold, Kolathur is seen as a safe seat but remains symbolically significant for the party’s leadership. Dr. Radhakrishnan Nagar Once represented by former Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa, Dr Radhakrishnan Nagar has seen shifting political dynamics. Currently held by DMK’s J John Ebenezer, the seat gained prominence after TTV Dhinakaran won it as an independent in a high-profile bypoll. Coimbatore South Coimbatore South is set for a direct contest between DMK’s V Senthilbalaji and AIADMK’s Amman K Arjunan. The constituency is considered a key battleground in western Tamil Nadu. Seeman Seeman, the chief coordinator of Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK), has fielded candidates in all 234 constituencies across Tamil Nadu and will contest from the Karaikudi seat. Known for maintaining an independent political stance, Seeman has steadily strengthened his party’s presence with each election, choosing not to form alliances with other parties. Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni Udhayanidhi Stalin, representing the next generation of leadership in the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, is contesting from Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni. A prominent campaigner, he has positioned himself as a youth-centric leader who combines political outreach with cultural engagement, making his performance crucial for the party’s future leadership narrative. Mylapore Senior BJP leader Tamilisai Soundararajan is contesting from Mylapore. A former governor, her candidature highlights the BJP’s strategy to strengthen its presence in urban constituencies by fielding well-known leaders and projecting itself as a governance-driven alternative to the DMK. Coimbatore Vanathi Srinivasan continues to be one of the BJP’s key figures in the Coimbatore region. With a strong organisational background and prior electoral success, she is expected to play a significant role both as a candidate and as a strategist in expanding the party’s base in western Tamil Nadu. Avinashi Union Minister L Murugan is contesting from Avinashi. As a prominent Dalit face of the BJP, his candidature reflects the party’s efforts to broaden its social outreach and build support among marginalised communities beyond its traditional urban strongholds. Other key constituencies to watch Several prominent leaders are expected to retain their seats, including SP Velumani from Thondamuthur and P. Thangamani from Kumarapalayam. On the DMK side, heavyweights such as Thangam Thenarasu (Tiruchuli), KN Nehru (Tiruchy-West), EV Velu (Tiruvannamalai), Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi (Tiruverumbur), and S Muthusamy (Erode-West) are also in focus as the state heads into a crucial electoral battle. Also Read: 'This time, elections in WB would surely be...': EC issues stern warning to TMC ahead of Bengal polls Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections Tamil Nadu will hold its Assembly elections on its 234 seats in a single phase on April 23, with the counting of votes scheduled for May 4. The current 16th Legislative Assembly is set to complete its five-year term on May 10, 2026. As per the election schedule, candidates can submit their nominations until April 6, after which scrutiny will take place on April 7. The deadline for withdrawal of nominations is April 9. The state has an electorate of over 5.67 crore voters, comprising a large number of young voters as well as persons with disabilities and senior citizens. The Secular Progressive Alliance (SPA), led by the DMK, won the election, ending a decade-long rule by the AIADMK in last elections.

Tamil Nadu heads to Assembly elections on April 23 with results on May 4. The DMK faces a triangular contest from BJP and Vijay’s TVK. Key seats include Kolathur, Coimbatore South, and Tiruchirappalli East, making the election crucial for the state’s political future.

From Stalin to Vijay: A look at key faces and seats in Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections

Concern over US munitions stockpiles has intensified after heavy use of Tomahawk, Patriot and other missiles in the Iran war. With a fragile ceasefire in place, a clearer picture has emerged: the United States has not run out of missiles, but has come close to testing the limits of its arsenal. Analysis of seven key munitions, conducted by the Centre of Strategic and International Studies, shows sufficient capacity to sustain this war under any plausible scenario. The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.&nbsp;<h2>&nbsp;A War Fought at Unsustainable Intensity</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>In just 39 days of air and missile operations over Iran, the United States expended enormous volumes of high-end munitions. For four of the seven critical munitions analysed, the US may have used more than 50 per cent of its pre-war inventory. This is not marginal depletion, but it is a structural drawdown of core capabilities that underpin modern warfare. CSIS notes: Rebuilding to prewar levels for the seven munitions will take from one to four years as missiles in the pipeline are delivered.&nbsp;Reduced inventories are also likely to constrain US supplies of Patriot, THAAD, and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) to Ukraine and other allies that depend on them. As stockpiles tighten, Washington will increasingly compete with partner nations seeking to rebuild their own arsenals, adding pressure to already stretched production lines. The challenge is further compounded by shifting dynamics among allies, with Japan recently opening the door to expanded arms exports, signalling a more active role in the global defence supply chain and probably intensifying competition for critical munitions and systems.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/f-35-b-21-advanced-drones-trump-s-1-5-trillion-defence-budget-prioritises-750-billion-for-ships-jets-golden-dome-1776786954360">F-35, B-21 &amp; advanced drones: Trump’s $1.5 trillion defence budget prioritises $750 billion for ships, jets and Golden Dome</a>&nbsp;<h2>High-Tempo Strikes Strain High-End Munitions</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>During the conflict, US forces struck over 13,000 targets in just 39 days, reflecting an exceptionally high operational tempo. As Iranian air defences were degraded, operations gradually shifted towards shorter-range, more readily available munitions. However, this transition was only partial. The United States continued to rely on long-range precision missiles for targets beyond reach or heavily defended, sustaining pressure on high-end inventories right up to the ceasefire.&nbsp;Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM)Tomahawk missiles, in service since the 1980s, have seen sustained operational use, but the Iran conflict marked an intense surge. CSIS says, US naval forces fired over 850 TLAMs in the first month, with totals likely exceeding 950 before the ceasefire. The strain is already visible: Japan’s planned delivery of 400 Tomahawks may be delayed, signalling pressure on both US inventories and allied commitments.&nbsp;Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM)More than 1,000 JASSMs were expended in the first month of operations, with an additional ~180 likely used before the ceasefire. Sustained sorties by B-52 bombers from UK bases kept demand high until the end. The scale of use highlights the missile’s central role in long-range strike operations—and the growing stress on high-end precision strike inventories.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-too-old-too-slow-too-expensive-us-air-force-is-keeping-a-10-warthog-until-2030-despite-retirement-calls-why-1776768344552">‘Too old, too slow, too expensive’: US Air Force is keeping A-10 Warthog until 2030 despite retirement calls. Why?</a>&nbsp;Precision Strike Missile (PrSM)The PrSM, still in early deployment, was used extensively against diverse targets, including reportedly maritime assets. One US Army official suggested the “entire inventory” may have been expended, though this remains contested. Even so, the scale of use has sharply reduced availability, likely halting near-term deliveries and exposing the vulnerability of low-volume, next-generation systems.&nbsp;Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)THAAD interceptors, already limited in number, faced intense demand, with over 150 fired during the conflict. The US operates just eight batteries, several redeployed to the Middle East, stretching global coverage. According to the analysis, the production gaps are acute, no new interceptors delivered since August 2023, with supply only expected to resume by April 2027. THAAD relies on scarce AN/TPY-2 radars, with only 13 delivered to date. Their potential loss or damage creates a critical capability gap, making THAAD the most constrained and strategically sensitive system.&nbsp;Patriot (PAC-3 MSE)Patriot systems remain in high global demand, with 18 countries operating them and Ukraine a major user. Around half of annual production is allocated to allies, tightening availability for US needs. While Lockheed Martin plans to raise PAC-3 MSE output to 2,000 annually by 2030 (from 600), near-term supply constraints will force difficult decisions over allocation and prioritisation.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-golden-grip-on-hormuz-why-gulf-fears-us-iran-talks-in-pakistan-risk-handing-tehran-control-of-middle-east-energy-lifeline-1776760786907">‘Golden grip on Hormuz?’ Why gulf fears US–Iran talks in Pakistan risk handing Tehran control of Middle East energy lifeline</a>&nbsp;<h2>The scale of usage</h2>&nbsp;The scale of US munitions use in the Iran conflict is stark against pre-war inventories. According to CSIS analysis, of roughly 3,100 Tomahawks, over 850 were used, while more than 1,000 JASSMs were expended from a stock of 4,400. Limited systems saw sharper strain: 40–70 PrSMs were used from just 90 available. Air defence was heavily taxed, with SM-3 usage (130–250) exceeding its 90-unit inventory, and SM-6 seeing 190–370 used from 410. Defensive systems bore the brunt, with THAAD (190–290 of 360) and Patriot (1,060–1,430 of 2,330) significantly depleted, highlighting the intensity and scale of consumption.&nbsp;

The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.

Concern over US munitions stockpiles has intensified after heavy use of Tomahawk, Patriot and other missiles in the Iran war. With a fragile ceasefire in place, a clearer picture has emerged: the United States has not run out of missiles, but has come close to testing the limits of its arsenal. Analysis of seven key munitions, conducted by the Centre of Strategic and International Studies, shows sufficient capacity to sustain this war under any plausible scenario. The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness. A War Fought at Unsustainable Intensity In just 39 days of air and missile operations over Iran, the United States expended enormous volumes of high-end munitions. For four of the seven critical munitions analysed, the US may have used more than 50 per cent of its pre-war inventory. This is not marginal depletion, but it is a structural drawdown of core capabilities that underpin modern warfare. CSIS notes: Rebuilding to prewar levels for the seven munitions will take from one to four years as missiles in the pipeline are delivered. Reduced inventories are also likely to constrain US supplies of Patriot, THAAD, and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) to Ukraine and other allies that depend on them. As stockpiles tighten, Washington will increasingly compete with partner nations seeking to rebuild their own arsenals, adding pressure to already stretched production lines. The challenge is further compounded by shifting dynamics among allies, with Japan recently opening the door to expanded arms exports, signalling a more active role in the global defence supply chain and probably intensifying competition for critical munitions and systems. ALSO READ: F-35, B-21 & advanced drones: Trump’s $1.5 trillion defence budget prioritises $750 billion for ships, jets and Golden Dome High-Tempo Strikes Strain High-End Munitions During the conflict, US forces struck over 13,000 targets in just 39 days, reflecting an exceptionally high operational tempo. As Iranian air defences were degraded, operations gradually shifted towards shorter-range, more readily available munitions. However, this transition was only partial. The United States continued to rely on long-range precision missiles for targets beyond reach or heavily defended, sustaining pressure on high-end inventories right up to the ceasefire. Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) Tomahawk missiles, in service since the 1980s, have seen sustained operational use, but the Iran conflict marked an intense surge. CSIS says, US naval forces fired over 850 TLAMs in the first month, with totals likely exceeding 950 before the ceasefire. The strain is already visible: Japan’s planned delivery of 400 Tomahawks may be delayed, signalling pressure on both US inventories and allied commitments. Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) More than 1,000 JASSMs were expended in the first month of operations, with an additional ~180 likely used before the ceasefire. Sustained sorties by B-52 bombers from UK bases kept demand high until the end. The scale of use highlights the missile’s central role in long-range strike operations—and the growing stress on high-end precision strike inventories. ALSO READ: ‘Too old, too slow, too expensive’: US Air Force is keeping A-10 Warthog until 2030 despite retirement calls. Why? Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) The PrSM, still in early deployment, was used extensively against diverse targets, including reportedly maritime assets. One US Army official suggested the “entire inventory” may have been expended, though this remains contested. Even so, the scale of use has sharply reduced availability, likely halting near-term deliveries and exposing the vulnerability of low-volume, next-generation systems. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) THAAD interceptors, already limited in number, faced intense demand, with over 150 fired during the conflict. The US operates just eight batteries, several redeployed to the Middle East, stretching global coverage. According to the analysis, the production gaps are acute, no new interceptors delivered since August 2023, with supply only expected to resume by April 2027. THAAD relies on scarce AN/TPY-2 radars, with only 13 delivered to date. Their potential loss or damage creates a critical capability gap, making THAAD the most constrained and strategically sensitive system. Patriot (PAC-3 MSE) Patriot systems remain in high global demand, with 18 countries operating them and Ukraine a major user. Around half of annual production is allocated to allies, tightening availability for US needs. While Lockheed Martin plans to raise PAC-3 MSE output to 2,000 annually by 2030 (from 600), near-term supply constraints will force difficult decisions over allocation and prioritisation. ALSO READ: ‘Golden grip on Hormuz?’ Why gulf fears US–Iran talks in Pakistan risk handing Tehran control of Middle East energy lifeline The scale of usage The scale of US munitions use in the Iran conflict is stark against pre-war inventories. According to CSIS analysis, of roughly 3,100 Tomahawks, over 850 were used, while more than 1,000 JASSMs were expended from a stock of 4,400. Limited systems saw sharper strain: 40–70 PrSMs were used from just 90 available. Air defence was heavily taxed, with SM-3 usage (130–250) exceeding its 90-unit inventory, and SM-6 seeing 190–370 used from 410. Defensive systems bore the brunt, with THAAD (190–290 of 360) and Patriot (1,060–1,430 of 2,330) significantly depleted, highlighting the intensity and scale of consumption.

The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.

US Stockpiles running dry? Heavy use in Iran war pushes THAAD, Patriot and Tomahawk reserves to the brink

Rafael Grossi, the chief of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), fears more countries could enter the race to develop nuclear weapons, breaching the NPT. The current environment could leave them feeling unsafe, pushing them to arm themselves with the bomb.

Nuclear threat looms as more countries push for nuclear weapons in unsafe world

Singapore's Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warned on April 22 that the current disruption in the Strait of Hormuz is just a “dry run” for a potential conflict between the US and China in the Eastern Pacific that has been in the making for decades now. Speaking at the CNBC’s CONVERGE LIVE event in Singapore, Balakrishnan said that a potential escalation in the Pacific will be far more catastrophic to global stability. Responding to questions about whether Singapore is facing any pressure from either the US or China, he asserted that Singapore will “refuse to choose sides” and act in its “long-term national interest”.&nbsp;&nbsp;“The way we conduct our affairs is we assess what is in Singapore’s long-term national interests, and if I have to say no to Washington or Beijing or anyone else, we don’t flinch from that.” He added, “We are acting in our own long-term national interest. We will be useful, but we will not be made use of.”Singapore shares an equally good relationship with Beijing, and Washington has a unique position to either get stretched between the two or benefit from both. It maintains a goods trade deficit with the US of about $3.6 billion; at the same time, the US is the largest foreign investor in Singapore. At the same time, China is the largest trading partner of Singapore.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-uae-bailout-currency-swap-iran-missiles-dollar-impact-1776836558371">Donald Trump considers UAE bailout, says he is shocked 'they are really rich'</a><h2>Weaponisation of “choke point”</h2>Singapore sits at the southern entrance of the vital choke point, the Singapore Strait, in the Indian Ocean, through the Strait of Malacca, at the junction of the Andaman Sea and the South China Sea, leading to the Pacific Ocean. Balakrishnan pointed out that the US-Israel-Iran war has revealed the importance of trade choke points.&nbsp;If the Strait of Hormuz accounts for 20 per cent of global energy trade, the Strait of Malacca accounts for more than 25 per cent of global energy trade. It has strategic interest to both China, Japan, and India. At its narrowest point its two nautical miles compared to the 21 nautical miles of the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;In March, there were reports that Iran was considering legislation for the extraction of toll, to which many analysts predicted that Singapore must be considering the collection of a similar tax in the Strait of Malacca. The minister told CNBC that the three nations, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia bordering the Strait, have an interest in keeping it open.“The right of transit passage is guaranteed for everyone. We will not participate in any attempts to close or interdict or to impose tolls in our neighbourhood.”&nbsp;However, with the increase in the militarisation of Japan, China is already alarmed, creating new faultlines. Singapore shares major ethnic and cultural relations with China. “Trust is basically a way of lowering transaction costs. Being predictable, being boring, being reliable, being trustworthy has got real value,” said Balakrishnan, hinting at the US unpredictability in Ukraine and tariffs sowed a sense of distrust. Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, in the keynote address, said, “Trust can no longer be assumed; it has to be built and strengthened.”&nbsp;&nbsp;

Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warns that the Hormuz crisis could be just a prelude to a potential US-China conflict in the Pacific Ocean. 

Singapore's Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warned on April 22 that the current disruption in the Strait of Hormuz is just a “dry run” for a potential conflict between the US and China in the Eastern Pacific that has been in the making for decades now. Speaking at the CNBC’s CONVERGE LIVE event in Singapore, Balakrishnan said that a potential escalation in the Pacific will be far more catastrophic to global stability. Responding to questions about whether Singapore is facing any pressure from either the US or China, he asserted that Singapore will “refuse to choose sides” and act in its “long-term national interest”. “The way we conduct our affairs is we assess what is in Singapore’s long-term national interests, and if I have to say no to Washington or Beijing or anyone else, we don’t flinch from that.” He added, “We are acting in our own long-term national interest. We will be useful, but we will not be made use of.” Singapore shares an equally good relationship with Beijing, and Washington has a unique position to either get stretched between the two or benefit from both. It maintains a goods trade deficit with the US of about $3.6 billion; at the same time, the US is the largest foreign investor in Singapore. At the same time, China is the largest trading partner of Singapore. Also Read: Donald Trump considers UAE bailout, says he is shocked 'they are really rich' Weaponisation of “choke point” Singapore sits at the southern entrance of the vital choke point, the Singapore Strait, in the Indian Ocean, through the Strait of Malacca, at the junction of the Andaman Sea and the South China Sea, leading to the Pacific Ocean. Balakrishnan pointed out that the US-Israel-Iran war has revealed the importance of trade choke points. If the Strait of Hormuz accounts for 20 per cent of global energy trade, the Strait of Malacca accounts for more than 25 per cent of global energy trade. It has strategic interest to both China, Japan, and India. At its narrowest point its two nautical miles compared to the 21 nautical miles of the Strait of Hormuz. In March, there were reports that Iran was considering legislation for the extraction of toll, to which many analysts predicted that Singapore must be considering the collection of a similar tax in the Strait of Malacca. The minister told CNBC that the three nations, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia bordering the Strait, have an interest in keeping it open. “The right of transit passage is guaranteed for everyone. We will not participate in any attempts to close or interdict or to impose tolls in our neighbourhood.” However, with the increase in the militarisation of Japan, China is already alarmed, creating new faultlines. Singapore shares major ethnic and cultural relations with China. “Trust is basically a way of lowering transaction costs. Being predictable, being boring, being reliable, being trustworthy has got real value,” said Balakrishnan, hinting at the US unpredictability in Ukraine and tariffs sowed a sense of distrust. Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, in the keynote address, said, “Trust can no longer be assumed; it has to be built and strengthened.”

Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warns that the Hormuz crisis could be just a prelude to a potential US-China conflict in the Pacific Ocean.&nbsp;

Singapore warns Hormuz crisis was a 'dry run' for US-China conflict

Since Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, China has taken a very careful and limited role in openly supporting Iran. On March 2, China’s foreign ministry said that the U.S. and Israeli strikes break international law, showing political support without direct involvement.There are also signs of quiet, indirect help. Ships from China carrying sodium perchlorate, a chemical used in missile fuel, are believed to have reached Iran. U.S. intelligence has warned that China may also be preparing to supply shoulder-fired rockets, which can target helicopters and low-flying aircraft.However, China has not provided major direct support like money or open military help. Instead, its biggest role is coming from an unexpected domain—space.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/irgc-gunboat-fires-on-container-ship-near-oman-heavy-damage-reported-amid-strait-of-hormuz-standoff-1776845119527">IRGC gunboat fires on container ship near Oman: Heavy damage reported amid Strait of Hormuz standoff</a>As highlighted by The Economist, social media is now flooded with satellite images of the Middle East captured by Chinese satellites and shared by Chinese companies. At the same time, American firms have restricted access to their satellite data due to pressure from the Trump administration. This has cut off journalists, researchers, and analysts from getting important open information.This restriction has now become even tighter. Planet Labs, a major U.S. satellite company, moved from a 14-day delay to an indefinite blackout on April 5, 2026. This means users no longer know when or if they will get fresh images. Because of this, the global OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) community is now heavily dependent on Chinese and European satellite data.One major trigger for this shift was the Minab incident on February 28, where a Tomahawk missile strike hit a school in Iran. Chinese satellite images were later used by international journalists to prove U.S. involvement, creating global pressure. This is widely seen as one of the reasons behind the strong American reaction against what some call “space transparency.”Because of these developments, Chinese satellite images are becoming more important than ever. They show how much China has improved its Earth-observation technology, meaning satellites that capture detailed images of Earth. This also shows that the West no longer has full control over high-quality space imagery.For analysts, this creates a mixed situation. Chinese images are useful, but they also raise serious concerns about control and credibility.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-hangs-man-for-corruption-on-earth-mossad-links-what-does-that-mean-1776841879206">Iran hangs man for 'corruption on Earth,' Mossad links - What does that mean?</a>The ongoing war has become a major opportunity for Chinese satellite companies to expand globally. As noted by The Economist, expert Bill Greer says that U.S. restrictions are unintentionally helping competitors like China, because American firms are limiting themselves while others fill the gap.There is also growing evidence of direct links between Chinese satellite companies and Iran. Leaked documents from April 15 revealed that Iran’s Revolutionary Guards acquired a Chinese satellite called TEE-01B, built by Earth Eye Co. This satellite was reportedly used to help target Prince Sultan Air Base on March 14, making it a major “smoking gun” showing real operational support.China’s strength lies in its rapidly expanding satellite network. In 2025 alone, it launched over 120 Earth-observation satellites, taking its total to more than 640 satellites, second only to the United States. These satellites use cameras, radar, and radio signals to monitor Earth.In China, the difference between private companies and the government is very small, meaning many firms are closely linked to the state. For example, the Jilin-1 network, with over 100 satellites, has ties to the military and can capture images of any place on Earth every 10 minutes.In terms of technology, China and the U.S. are now almost equal. China’s Superview Neo-1 satellite can produce images as sharp as top American systems. In some areas, like how frequently satellites revisit the same location, China may even be ahead because it has more satellites.China is also advancing in processing data directly in space, which means analysing images before sending them to Earth. Experts believe this advantage will grow further, as China leads in remote sensing technologies—tools used to study Earth from space.Another key benefit is that Chinese firms are not restricted by Western “shutter control” rules, which limit what satellite images can be shared. A Dubai-based company said Chinese partners provide faster and easier access to data, without delays from strict export rules.However, Chinese companies also have their own limitations, as they operate under government control. A former U.S. intelligence officer said they only act within what the Communist Party allows.In some cases, Chinese satellite images have actually exposed damage to U.S. military equipment and Gulf energy sites, which governments might have preferred to keep hidden. This has increased transparency in certain situations.Companies like MizarVision are using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve satellite images. AI helps sharpen blurry pictures, identify objects like aircraft, and track movements over time. Even if images are unclear, AI helps analysts understand what is happening.At the same time, AI is not always accurate. Some labels may be wrong, but feedback helps improve the system. Experts can correct mistakes, and the AI learns to become more precise.This is not the first time Chinese satellite firms have supported groups opposing the U.S. In the past, CGST shared images with the Wagner Group and Houthi rebels, which could help target military assets. Even after sanctions, Chinese companies like Spacety continue to grow and attract funding.China is also moving ahead in satellite video technology. Networks like Jilin-1 and Zhuhai-1 can record videos from space, while only one American company, Planet, has similar capability. Jilin-1 even uses laser communication to send videos directly to Earth.Still, some experts remain cautious. They worry about military links, and say Chinese firms do not always respond to data requests.Earlier, many believed that more satellites would bring greater global transparency. But today, the situation is different. As more countries build their own systems, most are focused on defence and intelligence use, not public sharing.In simple terms, the world is moving towards a reality where more countries are watching each other, but less information is openly available to everyone.

Ships from China carrying sodium perchlorate, a chemical used in missile fuel, are believed to have reached Iran. US intelligence has warned that China may also be preparing to supply shoulder-fired rockets, which can target helicopters and low-flying aircraft.

Since Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, China has taken a very careful and limited role in openly supporting Iran. On March 2, China’s foreign ministry said that the U.S. and Israeli strikes break international law, showing political support without direct involvement. There are also signs of quiet, indirect help. Ships from China carrying sodium perchlorate, a chemical used in missile fuel, are believed to have reached Iran. U.S. intelligence has warned that China may also be preparing to supply shoulder-fired rockets, which can target helicopters and low-flying aircraft. However, China has not provided major direct support like money or open military help. Instead, its biggest role is coming from an unexpected domain—space. Also read | IRGC gunboat fires on container ship near Oman: Heavy damage reported amid Strait of Hormuz standoff As highlighted by The Economist, social media is now flooded with satellite images of the Middle East captured by Chinese satellites and shared by Chinese companies. At the same time, American firms have restricted access to their satellite data due to pressure from the Trump administration. This has cut off journalists, researchers, and analysts from getting important open information. This restriction has now become even tighter. Planet Labs, a major U.S. satellite company, moved from a 14-day delay to an indefinite blackout on April 5, 2026. This means users no longer know when or if they will get fresh images. Because of this, the global OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) community is now heavily dependent on Chinese and European satellite data. One major trigger for this shift was the Minab incident on February 28, where a Tomahawk missile strike hit a school in Iran. Chinese satellite images were later used by international journalists to prove U.S. involvement, creating global pressure. This is widely seen as one of the reasons behind the strong American reaction against what some call “space transparency.” Because of these developments, Chinese satellite images are becoming more important than ever. They show how much China has improved its Earth-observation technology, meaning satellites that capture detailed images of Earth. This also shows that the West no longer has full control over high-quality space imagery. For analysts, this creates a mixed situation. Chinese images are useful, but they also raise serious concerns about control and credibility. Also read | Iran hangs man for 'corruption on Earth,' Mossad links - What does that mean? The ongoing war has become a major opportunity for Chinese satellite companies to expand globally. As noted by The Economist, expert Bill Greer says that U.S. restrictions are unintentionally helping competitors like China, because American firms are limiting themselves while others fill the gap. There is also growing evidence of direct links between Chinese satellite companies and Iran. Leaked documents from April 15 revealed that Iran’s Revolutionary Guards acquired a Chinese satellite called TEE-01B, built by Earth Eye Co. This satellite was reportedly used to help target Prince Sultan Air Base on March 14, making it a major “smoking gun” showing real operational support. China’s strength lies in its rapidly expanding satellite network. In 2025 alone, it launched over 120 Earth-observation satellites, taking its total to more than 640 satellites, second only to the United States. These satellites use cameras, radar, and radio signals to monitor Earth. In China, the difference between private companies and the government is very small, meaning many firms are closely linked to the state. For example, the Jilin-1 network, with over 100 satellites, has ties to the military and can capture images of any place on Earth every 10 minutes. In terms of technology, China and the U.S. are now almost equal. China’s Superview Neo-1 satellite can produce images as sharp as top American systems. In some areas, like how frequently satellites revisit the same location, China may even be ahead because it has more satellites. China is also advancing in processing data directly in space, which means analysing images before sending them to Earth. Experts believe this advantage will grow further, as China leads in remote sensing technologies—tools used to study Earth from space. Another key benefit is that Chinese firms are not restricted by Western “shutter control” rules, which limit what satellite images can be shared. A Dubai-based company said Chinese partners provide faster and easier access to data, without delays from strict export rules. However, Chinese companies also have their own limitations, as they operate under government control. A former U.S. intelligence officer said they only act within what the Communist Party allows. In some cases, Chinese satellite images have actually exposed damage to U.S. military equipment and Gulf energy sites, which governments might have preferred to keep hidden. This has increased transparency in certain situations. Companies like MizarVision are using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve satellite images. AI helps sharpen blurry pictures, identify objects like aircraft, and track movements over time. Even if images are unclear, AI helps analysts understand what is happening. At the same time, AI is not always accurate. Some labels may be wrong, but feedback helps improve the system. Experts can correct mistakes, and the AI learns to become more precise. This is not the first time Chinese satellite firms have supported groups opposing the U.S. In the past, CGST shared images with the Wagner Group and Houthi rebels, which could help target military assets. Even after sanctions, Chinese companies like Spacety continue to grow and attract funding. China is also moving ahead in satellite video technology. Networks like Jilin-1 and Zhuhai-1 can record videos from space, while only one American company, Planet, has similar capability. Jilin-1 even uses laser communication to send videos directly to Earth. Still, some experts remain cautious. They worry about military links, and say Chinese firms do not always respond to data requests. Earlier, many believed that more satellites would bring greater global transparency. But today, the situation is different. As more countries build their own systems, most are focused on defence and intelligence use, not public sharing. In simple terms, the world is moving towards a reality where more countries are watching each other, but less information is openly available to everyone.

Ships from China carrying sodium perchlorate, a chemical used in missile fuel, are believed to have reached Iran. US intelligence has warned that China may also be preparing to supply shoulder-fired rockets, which can target helicopters and low-flying aircraft.

How Beijing’s satellites are winning the Iran war

One year after the Pahalgam terror attack that took place on 22 April 2025, the aftershocks are still shaping South Asia’s geopolitics and testing the strategic clarity of the United States. The attack, which killed 26 innocent civilians, mostly Hindu tourists, was among the deadliest assaults on non-combatants in Kashmir in recent years. It not only reignited India–Pakistan tensions but also exposed the enduring duality in Washington’s regional approach—deepening ties with India while preserving tactical en&nbsp;Yet, the strategic convergence that might have followed did not fully materialise. Instead, India–US relations entered a phase of friction. A key irritant was President Trump’s claim of a US role in mediating between India and Pakistan—something New Delhi has consistently rejected. The disagreement soon spilled into the economic domain, with sharper rhetoric on trade imbalances, tariffs, and market access. What emerged was a familiar contradiction: the two countries aligned closely on security concerns, particularly terrorism and China’s rise, but diverged on economic nationalism and geopolitical autonomy.&nbsp;Despite these tensions, the relationship did not fracture. It recalibrated. The structural drivers of India–US ties remain strong. China’s growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific continues to push both countries closer, making their partnership strategically indispensable. Economic interdependence also plays a stabilising role, with the United States remaining one of India’s largest trading partners and a critical source of investment and technology. Institutional mechanisms—ranging from defence cooperation to multilateral platforms—provide continuity even when political signals fluctuate. In essence, both sides recognised that short-term disagreements could not override long-term strategic interests.&nbsp;Even as ties stabilised after&nbsp;the February 2026 trade deal, bringing the effective tariff rate down to&nbsp;18 per cent, a new geopolitical variable began to change the equation: rising tensions involving the conflict between the US-Israel and Iran. In this evolving West Asian geopolitical landscape, Pakistan has found renewed relevance. In its newfound role as global peacemaker, Pakistan has worked frantically to water down differences between Iran and the US. Leveraging its geography and historical ties, Islamabad has positioned itself as a potential intermediary in backchannel engagements. For Washington, this is less about preference and more about necessity. Pakistan offers access, influence, and logistical advantages that become valuable during regional crises.&nbsp;This renewed engagement does not imply a strategic shift away from India, but it does highlight a recurring pattern. The United States tends to engage Pakistan tactically when immediate regional challenges demand it, even as it invests in a longer-term partnership with India. For New Delhi, this creates both concern and clarity. The concern lies in the possibility that renewed US–Pakistan engagement could dilute international pressure on terror networks operating from Pakistani soil. The clarity, however, comes from recognising that Washington’s approach is fundamentally interest-driven and issue-specific.&nbsp;At the same time, India’s position has strengthened in certain respects. Its consistent emphasis on counter-terrorism, reinforced after Pahalgam, has bolstered its credibility globally. The country’s growing economic weight and its role in seminal Indo-Pacific dynamics ensure that it remains central to US strategic thinking. Moreover, India’s policy of strategic autonomy allows it to engage multiple global players without being locked into rigid alliances&nbsp;Pahalgam was a stark reminder that acts of terror can recast not only national security responses but also international alignments. For the United States, it reaffirmed the need to manage competing priorities in a volatile region. For India, it underscored the importance of engaging global partners with both realism and resolve. In a world defined by changing equations, stability is no longer assured—it is continuously negotiated.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-sets-condition-for-talks-in-pakistan-after-trump-s-ceasefire-extension-hormuz-kharg-island-islamabad-iran-port-blockade-1776841360874"> If they seek war, we are ready...': Iran sets condition for talks in Pakistan after Trump's ceasefire extension</a>

Trump reinforced this balance publicly, urging restraint and bilateral resolution even as tensions escalated briefly along the Line of Control. Behind the scenes, US diplomacy played a quiet role in encouraging de-escalation, underscoring its preference for stability over confrontation.

One year after the Pahalgam terror attack that took place on 22 April 2025, the aftershocks are still shaping South Asia’s geopolitics and testing the strategic clarity of the United States. The attack, which killed 26 innocent civilians, mostly Hindu tourists, was among the deadliest assaults on non-combatants in Kashmir in recent years. It not only reignited India–Pakistan tensions but also exposed the enduring duality in Washington’s regional approach—deepening ties with India while preserving tactical en Yet, the strategic convergence that might have followed did not fully materialise. Instead, India–US relations entered a phase of friction. A key irritant was President Trump’s claim of a US role in mediating between India and Pakistan—something New Delhi has consistently rejected. The disagreement soon spilled into the economic domain, with sharper rhetoric on trade imbalances, tariffs, and market access. What emerged was a familiar contradiction: the two countries aligned closely on security concerns, particularly terrorism and China’s rise, but diverged on economic nationalism and geopolitical autonomy. Despite these tensions, the relationship did not fracture. It recalibrated. The structural drivers of India–US ties remain strong. China’s growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific continues to push both countries closer, making their partnership strategically indispensable. Economic interdependence also plays a stabilising role, with the United States remaining one of India’s largest trading partners and a critical source of investment and technology. Institutional mechanisms—ranging from defence cooperation to multilateral platforms—provide continuity even when political signals fluctuate. In essence, both sides recognised that short-term disagreements could not override long-term strategic interests. Even as ties stabilised after the February 2026 trade deal, bringing the effective tariff rate down to 18 per cent, a new geopolitical variable began to change the equation: rising tensions involving the conflict between the US-Israel and Iran. In this evolving West Asian geopolitical landscape, Pakistan has found renewed relevance. In its newfound role as global peacemaker, Pakistan has worked frantically to water down differences between Iran and the US. Leveraging its geography and historical ties, Islamabad has positioned itself as a potential intermediary in backchannel engagements. For Washington, this is less about preference and more about necessity. Pakistan offers access, influence, and logistical advantages that become valuable during regional crises. This renewed engagement does not imply a strategic shift away from India, but it does highlight a recurring pattern. The United States tends to engage Pakistan tactically when immediate regional challenges demand it, even as it invests in a longer-term partnership with India. For New Delhi, this creates both concern and clarity. The concern lies in the possibility that renewed US–Pakistan engagement could dilute international pressure on terror networks operating from Pakistani soil. The clarity, however, comes from recognising that Washington’s approach is fundamentally interest-driven and issue-specific. At the same time, India’s position has strengthened in certain respects. Its consistent emphasis on counter-terrorism, reinforced after Pahalgam, has bolstered its credibility globally. The country’s growing economic weight and its role in seminal Indo-Pacific dynamics ensure that it remains central to US strategic thinking. Moreover, India’s policy of strategic autonomy allows it to engage multiple global players without being locked into rigid alliances Pahalgam was a stark reminder that acts of terror can recast not only national security responses but also international alignments. For the United States, it reaffirmed the need to manage competing priorities in a volatile region. For India, it underscored the importance of engaging global partners with both realism and resolve. In a world defined by changing equations, stability is no longer assured—it is continuously negotiated. Also read: If they seek war, we are ready...': Iran sets condition for talks in Pakistan after Trump's ceasefire extension

Trump reinforced this balance publicly, urging restraint and bilateral resolution even as tensions escalated briefly along the Line of Control. Behind the scenes, US diplomacy played a quiet role in encouraging de-escalation, underscoring its preference for stability over confrontation.

Pahalgam, Pakistan and power politics: How the US balances India and Islamabad

An Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps gunboat fired on a container ship off the coast of Oman on Wednesday (Apr 22), causing significant damage to the vessel's bridge — an incident that underscores just how volatile the Strait of Hormuz remains even as ceasefire talks continue.The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre confirmed the attack, saying the vessel's master reported being approached by an IRGC gunboat that "fired upon the vessel, which has caused heavy damage to the bridge." The agency said there were no fires, no environmental impact, and all crew members were safe. The incident took place approximately 15 nautical miles northeast of Oman.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/will-india-send-troops-to-strait-of-hormuz-london-military-meet-to-protect-navigation-in-global-chicken-neck-begins-today-1776825255490">Will India send troops to Strait of Hormuz? London military meet to protect navigation in 'global chicken neck' begins today</a><h2>What happened?</h2>"The master of a container ship reported that the vessel was approached by one IRGC gunboat... that then fired upon the vessel, which has caused heavy damage to the bridge. No fires or environmental impact reported," said the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre.The incident took place 15 nautical miles northeast of Oman, and all the crew escaped the attack safely. The ship, sailing under a Liberian flag, had reportedly been told it had permission to transit the strait. British maritime security firm Vanguard Tech confirmed the vessel "had been informed it had permission to transit the Strait of Hormuz" before the attack occurred. However, according to Iran's Tasnim news agency, the ship had "ignored warnings from Iran's armed forces."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-hangs-man-for-corruption-on-earth-mossad-links-what-does-that-mean-1776841879206">Iran hangs man for 'corruption on Earth,' Mossad links - What does that mean?</a><h2>Strait of Hormuz remains shut</h2>The conflicting versions go to the heart of the problem in the Strait right now. Iran had reopened the waterway to commercial traffic during the two-week ceasefire between Iran and the US. However, soon after Tehran closed the waterway, accusing Washington of breaking a promise by continuing its naval blockade of ships sailing to and from Iran's ports. Iran's central military command later announced that it would resume "strict management" of the Strait of Hormuz.The attack landed on the same day Trump announced he was extending the US-Iran ceasefire beyond its original April 8 expiration, giving negotiators more time to work toward a lasting agreement. The US naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in place throughout the extension, a point Iran has repeatedly called a ceasefire violation.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Did Iran just fire on a commercial ship near the Strait of Hormuz? A container vessel was damaged after an alleged attack by an IRGC gunboat off Oman, even as ceasefire talks continue.

What exactly happened? Scroll down to read more.

An Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps gunboat fired on a container ship off the coast of Oman on Wednesday (Apr 22), causing significant damage to the vessel's bridge — an incident that underscores just how volatile the Strait of Hormuz remains even as ceasefire talks continue. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre confirmed the attack, saying the vessel's master reported being approached by an IRGC gunboat that "fired upon the vessel, which has caused heavy damage to the bridge." The agency said there were no fires, no environmental impact, and all crew members were safe. The incident took place approximately 15 nautical miles northeast of Oman. Also read | Will India send troops to Strait of Hormuz? London military meet to protect navigation in 'global chicken neck' begins today What happened? "The master of a container ship reported that the vessel was approached by one IRGC gunboat... that then fired upon the vessel, which has caused heavy damage to the bridge. No fires or environmental impact reported," said the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre. The incident took place 15 nautical miles northeast of Oman, and all the crew escaped the attack safely. The ship, sailing under a Liberian flag, had reportedly been told it had permission to transit the strait. British maritime security firm Vanguard Tech confirmed the vessel "had been informed it had permission to transit the Strait of Hormuz" before the attack occurred. However, according to Iran's Tasnim news agency, the ship had "ignored warnings from Iran's armed forces." Also read | Iran hangs man for 'corruption on Earth,' Mossad links - What does that mean? Strait of Hormuz remains shut The conflicting versions go to the heart of the problem in the Strait right now. Iran had reopened the waterway to commercial traffic during the two-week ceasefire between Iran and the US. However, soon after Tehran closed the waterway, accusing Washington of breaking a promise by continuing its naval blockade of ships sailing to and from Iran's ports. Iran's central military command later announced that it would resume "strict management" of the Strait of Hormuz. The attack landed on the same day Trump announced he was extending the US-Iran ceasefire beyond its original April 8 expiration, giving negotiators more time to work toward a lasting agreement. The US naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in place throughout the extension, a point Iran has repeatedly called a ceasefire violation. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Did Iran just fire on a commercial ship near the Strait of Hormuz? A container vessel was damaged after an alleged attack by an IRGC gunboat off Oman, even as ceasefire talks continue.What exactly happened? Scroll down to read more.

IRGC gunboat fires on container ship near Oman: Heavy damage reported amid Strait of Hormuz standoff

Iran says it will join talks in Islamabad only if the US ends its naval blockade, calling it a ceasefire violation. As Trump extends the truce, Tehran remains sceptical, citing shifting US demands, while tensions rise and uncertainty surrounds peace negotiations.

If they seek war, we are ready...': Iran sets condition for talks in Pakistan after Trump's ceasefire extension

Iran on Wednesday (Apr 21) hanged a man, accusing him of 'corruption on Earth'. The man, identified as Mehdi Farid by Iran's judiciary's Mizan Online website, was convicted of links to Israel's spy agency, the Mossad. This happens to be the latest execution Tehran has carried out against the backdrop of the war with Israel and the United States."Mehdi Farid... &nbsp;was hanged this morning for extensive cooperation with the terrorist spy service Mossad after the case was examined and the final verdict was approved," said the judiciary's Mizan Online website.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-if-chatgpt-was-a-person-it-d-be-facing-murder-charges-openai-chatbot-behind-florida-university-mass-shooting-criminal-probe-launched-1776835015486">'If ChatGPT was a person, it'd be facing murder charges': OpenAI chatbot behind Florida Uni mass shooting? Criminal probe launched</a><h2>What was Mehdi Farid's crime?</h2>Authorities accused him of working with the "terrorist spy service Mossad". According to AFP, it was not immediately clear what Farid did or when his trial took place. However, the court found him guilty of "intelligence cooperation and espionage for the Zionist regime" under the capital offence "corruption on earth".In recent weeks, Iran has carried out multiple executions of people allegedly linked to mass protests in January, which authorities claim were instigated by Israel, the United States, and opposition groups, including the banned People’s Mujahedin.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/will-india-send-troops-to-strait-of-hormuz-london-military-meet-to-protect-navigation-in-global-chicken-neck-begins-today-1776825255490">Will India send troops to Strait of Hormuz? London military meet to protect navigation in 'global chicken neck' begins today</a><h2>What does corruption on Earth mean?</h2>Corruption on Earth or Mofsed-e-filarz is a severe capital crime under Islamic law, Sharia and carries the death penalty. It is defined as a crime against the state, public security or moral order. According to the Iran Press Watch, in its Quranic usage, the phrase means "corrupt conditions, caused by unbelievers and unjust people, that threaten social and political well-being."However, in his book "Human Rights in Iran: The Abuse of Cultural Relativism," Reza Afshari writes that Iran's slain Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini allegedly transformed the traditional Islamic idea into a tool to be wielded by the Islamic state against its perceived enemies. &nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran executes a man for “corruption on Earth”? Authorities say Mehdi Farid was linked to Israel’s Mossad, but details remain unclear.

What does this charge actually mean?

Scroll down to read more.

Iran on Wednesday (Apr 21) hanged a man, accusing him of 'corruption on Earth'. The man, identified as Mehdi Farid by Iran's judiciary's Mizan Online website, was convicted of links to Israel's spy agency, the Mossad. This happens to be the latest execution Tehran has carried out against the backdrop of the war with Israel and the United States. "Mehdi Farid... was hanged this morning for extensive cooperation with the terrorist spy service Mossad after the case was examined and the final verdict was approved," said the judiciary's Mizan Online website. Also read | 'If ChatGPT was a person, it'd be facing murder charges': OpenAI chatbot behind Florida Uni mass shooting? Criminal probe launched What was Mehdi Farid's crime? Authorities accused him of working with the "terrorist spy service Mossad". According to AFP, it was not immediately clear what Farid did or when his trial took place. However, the court found him guilty of "intelligence cooperation and espionage for the Zionist regime" under the capital offence "corruption on earth". In recent weeks, Iran has carried out multiple executions of people allegedly linked to mass protests in January, which authorities claim were instigated by Israel, the United States, and opposition groups, including the banned People’s Mujahedin. Also read | Will India send troops to Strait of Hormuz? London military meet to protect navigation in 'global chicken neck' begins today What does corruption on Earth mean? Corruption on Earth or Mofsed-e-filarz is a severe capital crime under Islamic law, Sharia and carries the death penalty. It is defined as a crime against the state, public security or moral order. According to the Iran Press Watch, in its Quranic usage, the phrase means "corrupt conditions, caused by unbelievers and unjust people, that threaten social and political well-being." However, in his book "Human Rights in Iran: The Abuse of Cultural Relativism," Reza Afshari writes that Iran's slain Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini allegedly transformed the traditional Islamic idea into a tool to be wielded by the Islamic state against its perceived enemies. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran executes a man for “corruption on Earth”? Authorities say Mehdi Farid was linked to Israel’s Mossad, but details remain unclear.What does this charge actually mean?Scroll down to read more.

Iran hangs man for 'corruption on Earth,' Mossad links - What does that mean?

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said that he is considering a financial request from the UAE. While speaking to the CNBC show Squawk Box, Trump said that “he found it shocking”, but the US might consider a financial bailout with the United Arab Emirates, or some sort of financial arrangement involving a currency swap line. He also added that they were hit “hardest” with around 1400 missiles. He said that Iran was the “bully” of the region that was threatening everyone and added that "it was shocking because we thought that they [Iran] would shoot missiles at Israel but not every other country in the area.”Trump, further responding to the query from the anchor that the UAE is traditionally considered to be rich, said, “Yeah, I mean, I am surprised because they are really rich.” But he said that it is under consideration, he added that US allies in the Gulf are “much better allies than NATO”.&nbsp;Trump said that &nbsp;“the UAE got hit with 1,400 missiles,” and added “fortunately they had great defence, and were able to shoot down most of them, but they did get hit hard. They were hit the hardest of the group, actually. And really led by incredible people.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/palantir-manifesto-ai-militarisation-technofascism-debate-1776774249138">Palantir's manifesto calls for AI militarisation, critics call it dystopian and 'technofascism’</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump says he&#39;ll give some kind of financial bailout to the UAE, because he found it &quot;shocking&quot; they were hit so hard; he thought Iran would only try to strike Israel. (So in other words, there was instant escalation beyond what he anticipated, and now the US will foot the bill) <a href="https://t.co/7DuD7WeW8R">pic.twitter.com/7DuD7WeW8R</a>&mdash; Michael Tracey (@mtracey) <a href="https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/2046614301541122363?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 21, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Trump also mentioned that he got a $1 trillion investment from the UAE last year for an aluminium plant in Oklahoma. “They’re very good to this country, so yeah, if I can help them, I will,”The Wall Street Journal reported that the UAE Central Bank Governor, Khaled Mohamed Balama, initiated talks with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve officials during meetings in Washington the previous week. The report highlighted that the Emirati official suggested that they might be compelled to conduct oil sales and other transactions in Chinese yuan if not provided a dollar lifeline. The officials described that the request was "preliminary and precautionary," however, it is typical for the Federal Reserve to push back against any currency swap, unless there were chances of spillover to affect the US economy.&nbsp;This development is significant as it is a reversal of the script when the White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters President Donald Trump was "quite interested" in a plan of demanding payments from the Gulf to fund the war. Now, if the US is paying for the war to the UAE, along with the daily war cost, it could affect the dollar's position as the global reserve currency.&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump says he is considering financial aid or a currency swap with the UAE after damage from Iranian missile attacks, raising questions about dollar dominance.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said that he is considering a financial request from the UAE. While speaking to the CNBC show Squawk Box, Trump said that “he found it shocking”, but the US might consider a financial bailout with the United Arab Emirates, or some sort of financial arrangement involving a currency swap line. He also added that they were hit “hardest” with around 1400 missiles. He said that Iran was the “bully” of the region that was threatening everyone and added that "it was shocking because we thought that they [Iran] would shoot missiles at Israel but not every other country in the area.” Trump, further responding to the query from the anchor that the UAE is traditionally considered to be rich, said, “Yeah, I mean, I am surprised because they are really rich.” But he said that it is under consideration, he added that US allies in the Gulf are “much better allies than NATO”. Trump said that “the UAE got hit with 1,400 missiles,” and added “fortunately they had great defence, and were able to shoot down most of them, but they did get hit hard. They were hit the hardest of the group, actually. And really led by incredible people.” Also Read: Palantir's manifesto calls for AI militarisation, critics call it dystopian and 'technofascism’

US President Donald Trump says he is considering financial aid or a currency swap with the UAE after damage from Iranian missile attacks, raising questions about dollar dominance.

Donald Trump considers UAE bailout says he is shocked 'they are really rich'

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US Navy will continue blocking Iranian ports, warning Kharg Island storage may soon be full, forcing oil shutdowns and severe revenue losses. The move targets Iran’s key energy lifeline and escalates economic pressure amid rising regional tensions.

'Kharg Island will be...': US reveals masterplan to unleash 'economic fury' on Iran amid Hormuz blockade

Deutsche Lufthansa AG plans to cut 20,000 unprofitable short-haul flights from its European summer schedule to reduce jet fuel costs, which have surged since the start of the war in Iran. In a statement on Tuesday, Europe's largest airline group said the cuts will amount to 1 per cent of available seat-kilometres, saving nearly 40,000 tons of jet fuel This follows last week’s decision to shut down its Cityline regional unit and retire 27 older, fuel-inefficient aircraft. Lufthansa has taken some of the most aggressive measures among global carriers amid the crisis, while also dealing with strikes by pilots and cabin crew.<h3>Industry's capacity</h3>The first 120 flight cancellations took effect on Tuesday and will run until the end of May, with further reductions for the summer schedule expected to be announced by late April or early May. The industry's capacity for May has been reduced globally by almost 3 percentage points, with all but one of the 20 largest airlines slashing flights, according to data compiled by the analytics firm Cirium Ltd. The analytics firm revised its initial prediction, indicating 4 per cent to 6 per cent growth for the year, adding that a decline of as much as 3 per cent is possible under certain conditions. Meanwhile, Deutsche Lufthansa AG is aiming to improve profitability by planning to reduce around 4,000 administrative roles by 2030 and shifting more short-haul operations to lower-cost subsidiaries like City Airlines and Discover Airlines, where crew expenses can be up to 40 per cent lower than at its main carrier.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-if-chatgpt-was-a-person-it-d-be-facing-murder-charges-openai-chatbot-behind-florida-university-mass-shooting-criminal-probe-launched-1776835015486">'If ChatGPT was a person, it'd be facing murder charges': OpenAI chatbot behind Florida Uni mass shooting? Criminal probe launched</a> &nbsp;

The first 120 flight cancellations took effect on Tuesday and will run until the end of May, with further reductions for the summer schedule expected to be announced by late April or early May. 

Deutsche Lufthansa AG plans to cut 20,000 unprofitable short-haul flights from its European summer schedule to reduce jet fuel costs, which have surged since the start of the war in Iran. In a statement on Tuesday, Europe's largest airline group said the cuts will amount to 1 per cent of available seat-kilometres, saving nearly 40,000 tons of jet fuel This follows last week’s decision to shut down its Cityline regional unit and retire 27 older, fuel-inefficient aircraft. Lufthansa has taken some of the most aggressive measures among global carriers amid the crisis, while also dealing with strikes by pilots and cabin crew. Industry's capacity The first 120 flight cancellations took effect on Tuesday and will run until the end of May, with further reductions for the summer schedule expected to be announced by late April or early May. The industry's capacity for May has been reduced globally by almost 3 percentage points, with all but one of the 20 largest airlines slashing flights, according to data compiled by the analytics firm Cirium Ltd. The analytics firm revised its initial prediction, indicating 4 per cent to 6 per cent growth for the year, adding that a decline of as much as 3 per cent is possible under certain conditions. Meanwhile, Deutsche Lufthansa AG is aiming to improve profitability by planning to reduce around 4,000 administrative roles by 2030 and shifting more short-haul operations to lower-cost subsidiaries like City Airlines and Discover Airlines, where crew expenses can be up to 40 per cent lower than at its main carrier. Also read: 'If ChatGPT was a person, it'd be facing murder charges': OpenAI chatbot behind Florida Uni mass shooting? Criminal probe launched

The first 120 flight cancellations took effect on Tuesday and will run until the end of May, with further reductions for the summer schedule expected to be announced by late April or early May.&nbsp;

Lufthansa grounds 20,000 flights as jet fuel prices increase amid West Asia war

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

TMC, BJP make West Bengal Election campaign a 'fishy' affair: Phase 1 ends with a bit of 'jhalmuri', Phase 2 relies on 'revri'

Thailand vs Cambodia: The Border Temple Dispute Reignites

Israel faces possible suspension from European rights body

What is China’s Atlas drone swarm system and why is it a concern for India?

Nepal Home Minister Sudhan Gurung resigns

War reset: Why United States extended Iran ceasefire without request?

Who is Ahmad Vahidi? Is IRGC chief shaping Iran’s war decisions?

India-bound ship among two vessels attacked in Strait of Hormuz, seized by Iran

Islamabad's mediation efforts stutter as US-Iran ceasefire deadline looms

With Hormuz disrupted, what are other routes for Middle East energy exports

Not even a month in office, Nepal’s Balen Shah govt already facing protests

From India to Australia: Why are oil refineries burning simultaneously?

US Army nuke chief reveals sensitive information on Iran war in viral video

‘Nearly 8,000 dead or missing’: UN data exposes scale of migrant deaths in 2025, Europe’s sea routes most deadly

From Stalin to Vijay: A look at key faces and seats in Tamil Nadu Elections

Heavy use in Iran war pushes US THAAD, Patriot & Tomahawk reserves to the brink