Tensions in the US–Iran conflict continue to escalate as President Donald Trump highlights the profitability of seized Iranian oil cargo under the ongoing naval blockade. Speaking on recent operations, Trump described the interception of Iranian vessels and oil shipments as a “very profitable business,” amid growing geopolitical and maritime tensions in the Strait of Hormuz

US-Iran War | Trump on Seizing Iranian Oil Cargo: Its a Very Profitable Business 

Tensions in the US-Iran conflict continue to escalate as Washington issues a fresh warning to global shipping companies. US President Donald Trump has cautioned that vessels paying tolls or fees to Iran for passage through the Strait of Hormuz could face strict consequences, including sanctions. The move comes amid rising instability in the vital shipping route and growing fears of wider economic disruption in global energy markets.


US-Iran War: Trump Warns Shipping Companies Against Paying Tolls to Iran

The question over whether the US–Iran war has truly been “terminated” is now at the center of political and legal debate in Washington. The White House has claimed that hostilities have ended following a ceasefire and no exchange of fire, but critics argue that ongoing military presence and operations in the region suggest the conflict is not fully over. With interpretations of the War Powers Resolution also in dispute, uncertainty remains over the real status of the war.


US-Iran War: Has The US War Against Iran Really Been 'Terminated'? 

The War Powers Resolution has come under renewed focus amid escalating US–Iran tensions, as it limits the President’s ability to use military force without congressional approval. The law requires notification to Congress within 48 hours of military action and restricts prolonged engagements without authorization. As debates continue over executive versus legislative authority, concerns are rising about unchecked military escalation in sensitive regions like the Middle East.


US-Iran War: War Powers Act Limits The Use of Force Without Congress Approval

The US State Department on Friday approved military sales worth over $8.6 billion to key Middle East allies, Israel, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, invoking an emergency provision to bypass the usual congressional review process.&nbsp;The clearance from the Trump administration comes as tensions in the region remain high, with the ongoing conflict involving Iran entering its ninth week. While a fragile truce is in place, no formal agreement has yet been reached to end hostilities.&nbsp;The approved packages include a range of advanced military systems, from precision-guided munitions to sophisticated air defence interceptors. Officials said the expedited approval was necessary to address urgent security concerns and reinforce allied defence capabilities in the region.&nbsp;For Israel, the US cleared the sale of 10,000 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System-II (APKWS-II) All Up Rounds and related equipment, valued at $992.4 million. The systems will be manufactured by BAE Systems.&nbsp;Qatar also received approval for a similar $992.4 million deal involving 10,000 APKWS-II systems. In addition, Doha secured a much larger package worth $4.01 billion, including 200 Patriot Advanced Capability-2 (PAC-2) GEM-T interceptors and 300 PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement interceptors. The principal contractors for these systems include Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation.&nbsp;The United Arab Emirates was authorised to purchase 1,500 APKWS-II guidance sections for air-to-air applications at a cost of $147.6 million.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/west-bengal-protests-erupt-in-falta-as-residents-allege-intimidation-before-may-4-counting-1777724375375">West Bengal: Protests erupt in Falta as residents allege TMC intimidation ahead of May 4 counting</a>&nbsp;Meanwhile, Kuwait’s package, valued at $2.5 billion, includes Integrated Battle Command Systems and associated equipment. The deal involves major defence contractors such as Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation.&nbsp;US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the decision, stating that an “emergency exists that requires the immediate sale” of these weapons. Typically, such arms deals undergo a congressional review period, with final quantities and pricing determined through negotiations between buyers and suppliers.&nbsp;However, the State Department said the accelerated approval aligns with US national security interests, particularly in light of escalating regional threats.&nbsp;The West Asia crisis began on February 28, when the US and Israel launched military strikes targeting Iran. Tehran responded with retaliatory actions against US-aligned nations in the region, including the UAE, Qatar and Kuwait. Despite the ongoing truce, tensions remain elevated, prompting Washington to strengthen the defensive capabilities of its allies.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the decision, stating that an “emergency exists that requires the immediate sale” of these weapons. 

The US State Department on Friday approved military sales worth over $8.6 billion to key Middle East allies, Israel, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, invoking an emergency provision to bypass the usual congressional review process. The clearance from the Trump administration comes as tensions in the region remain high, with the ongoing conflict involving Iran entering its ninth week. While a fragile truce is in place, no formal agreement has yet been reached to end hostilities. The approved packages include a range of advanced military systems, from precision-guided munitions to sophisticated air defence interceptors. Officials said the expedited approval was necessary to address urgent security concerns and reinforce allied defence capabilities in the region. For Israel, the US cleared the sale of 10,000 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System-II (APKWS-II) All Up Rounds and related equipment, valued at $992.4 million. The systems will be manufactured by BAE Systems. Qatar also received approval for a similar $992.4 million deal involving 10,000 APKWS-II systems. In addition, Doha secured a much larger package worth $4.01 billion, including 200 Patriot Advanced Capability-2 (PAC-2) GEM-T interceptors and 300 PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement interceptors. The principal contractors for these systems include Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation. The United Arab Emirates was authorised to purchase 1,500 APKWS-II guidance sections for air-to-air applications at a cost of $147.6 million. Also Read: West Bengal: Protests erupt in Falta as residents allege TMC intimidation ahead of May 4 counting Meanwhile, Kuwait’s package, valued at $2.5 billion, includes Integrated Battle Command Systems and associated equipment. The deal involves major defence contractors such as Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the decision, stating that an “emergency exists that requires the immediate sale” of these weapons. Typically, such arms deals undergo a congressional review period, with final quantities and pricing determined through negotiations between buyers and suppliers. However, the State Department said the accelerated approval aligns with US national security interests, particularly in light of escalating regional threats. The West Asia crisis began on February 28, when the US and Israel launched military strikes targeting Iran. Tehran responded with retaliatory actions against US-aligned nations in the region, including the UAE, Qatar and Kuwait. Despite the ongoing truce, tensions remain elevated, prompting Washington to strengthen the defensive capabilities of its allies.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the decision, stating that an “emergency exists that requires the immediate sale” of these weapons.&nbsp;

Trump administration clears $8.6 bn arms sales to Israel, Qatar, UAE and Kuwait amid Iran tensions

The ongoing US-Iran conflict has severely disrupted the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global energy supplies. With shipping traffic reduced and tanker movement restricted, key fuel routes supplying oil and gas to Asia, Europe, and beyond are under strain. Nearly 20% of the world’s oil flows through this narrow passage, making any disruption a major global concern.


US-Iran War: Hormuz Disruption Hits Key Global Fuel Supply Routes 

Tensions between the United States and Iran are escalating rapidly after the U.S. Navy seized an Iranian-linked cargo vessel near the Strait of Hormuz. The ship was reportedly intercepted after ignoring warnings and attempting to breach a U.S.-imposed naval blockade.


US-Iran War: US Seizes Iranian Ships Amid Rising Tensions

An Iranian military official on Saturday (May 2) warned of a renewed conflict with the United States as peace talks continue to stall amid tensions. This comes after US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 1) said that he was “not satisfied” with what the Iranians have offered in their new proposal. He also warned Tehran to make a deal with him, threatening to “blast them to hell” if it fails to strike a deal with Washington.&nbsp;“A renewed conflict between Iran and the United States is likely, and evidence has shown that the United States is not committed to any promises or agreements,” Mohammad Jafar Asadi of the military’s central command centre, Khatam al-Anbiya, was quoted as saying by Iran's Fars news agency.<h2>Trump unhappy with Iran proposal</h2>The Iranian state media reported that Tehran had delivered a new proposal to Pakistan on Thursday evening. Following the report, Trump told reporters that he was “not satisfied” with what the Iranians were offering at the moment.Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, “At this moment I’m not satisfied with what they’re offering.”When asked why was he unsatisfied with the Iranian proposal, Trump responded, “They’re asking for things that I can’t agree.” The US president did not give details on what things the Iranians were asking.Trump also said that Iran had “made strides” in the discussions, but added that there was “tremendous discord” in the Islamic Republic’s leadership. He said, “I’m not sure if they ever get there.”When asked what he would do if Iran fails to strike a deal, Trump said, “Do we want to go and just blast the hell out of them and finish them forever – or do we want to try and make a deal? I mean, those are the options.”The Republican president added that he would “prefer not” to launch a huge offensive against Tehran, but warned, “That’s the option: do we want to go in there heavy and just blast them away or do we want to do something?”<h2>Trump briefed on ‘final blow’?</h2>According to an Axios report, Trump was briefed by CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper on new plans for a potential military action against Iran on Thursday (Apr 30). It added that the US president was “seriously considering” resuming major combat operations in Iran amid stalled talks or to deliver a “final blow” before ending the war.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

An Iranian official warned of possible renewed conflict with the US as stalled talks raise tensions. This follows Donald Trump’s threat to act militarily if Tehran fails to reach a deal.

An Iranian military official on Saturday (May 2) warned of a renewed conflict with the United States as peace talks continue to stall amid tensions. This comes after US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 1) said that he was “not satisfied” with what the Iranians have offered in their new proposal. He also warned Tehran to make a deal with him, threatening to “blast them to hell” if it fails to strike a deal with Washington. “A renewed conflict between Iran and the United States is likely, and evidence has shown that the United States is not committed to any promises or agreements,” Mohammad Jafar Asadi of the military’s central command centre, Khatam al-Anbiya, was quoted as saying by Iran's Fars news agency. Trump unhappy with Iran proposal The Iranian state media reported that Tehran had delivered a new proposal to Pakistan on Thursday evening. Following the report, Trump told reporters that he was “not satisfied” with what the Iranians were offering at the moment. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, “At this moment I’m not satisfied with what they’re offering.” When asked why was he unsatisfied with the Iranian proposal, Trump responded, “They’re asking for things that I can’t agree.” The US president did not give details on what things the Iranians were asking. Trump also said that Iran had “made strides” in the discussions, but added that there was “tremendous discord” in the Islamic Republic’s leadership. He said, “I’m not sure if they ever get there.” When asked what he would do if Iran fails to strike a deal, Trump said, “Do we want to go and just blast the hell out of them and finish them forever – or do we want to try and make a deal? I mean, those are the options.” The Republican president added that he would “prefer not” to launch a huge offensive against Tehran, but warned, “That’s the option: do we want to go in there heavy and just blast them away or do we want to do something?” Trump briefed on ‘final blow’? According to an Axios report, Trump was briefed by CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper on new plans for a potential military action against Iran on Thursday (Apr 30). It added that the US president was “seriously considering” resuming major combat operations in Iran amid stalled talks or to deliver a “final blow” before ending the war. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

An Iranian official warned of possible renewed conflict with the US as stalled talks raise tensions. This follows Donald Trump’s threat to act militarily if Tehran fails to reach a deal.

‘Renewed war’ between US and Iran likely? Iranian official’s BIG warning as talks stall

The US Defense Department estimates that Iran has lost nearly $5 billion in oil revenue due to a US blockade in the Gulf of Oman, intensifying economic pressure on Tehran. Officials say the blockade is President Donald Trump’s most powerful tool to push negotiations aimed at ending the war with Iran, even as diplomatic talks continue to stall and restart. Since the operation started on April 13, the US military has redirected more than 40 vessels attempting to move oil and other contraband through the region, according to Pentagon officials.&nbsp;In total, 31 tankers carrying approximately 53 million barrels of Iranian crude are now ‘stuck in the Gulf’, valued at around $4.8 billion. Two vessels have already been seized by US forces. With storage capacity on land reaching its limits, Iran has reportedly started using older tankers as floating storage units. Some shipments are now taking longer, more expensive routes to reach buyers in China, partly to avoid US interception. Shipping analysts note that Iranian tankers have adapted by hugging coastlines near Pakistan and India, using safer maritime corridors toward the Strait of Malacca, where oil is often transferred between vessels bound for China.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-withdraw-5-000-troops-from-germany-as-trump-s-feud-with-merz-intensifies-1777673755555">US to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany as Trump's feud with Merz intensifies</a>&nbsp;Samir Madani, co-founder of TankerTrackers.com, said one Iranian tanker, nicknamed “HUGE,” demonstrated how ships attempt to evade interception. He said vessels are increasingly relying on stealth routing through regional waters. Madani also warned that Iran may eventually attempt a large-scale breakout. “I think the Iranians will wait for an opportunity to launch an overnight 'Great Escape' once they have built up even further storage near the border with Pakistan,” he told Axios.&nbsp;The situation reflects a broader economic confrontation, with both Iran and the United States using maritime pressure tactics. Iran has previously restricted movement through the Strait of Hormuz, while the US has increased pressure at the Gulf of Oman entry point. Analysts say the strategy is aimed at forcing Iran’s storage capacity to collapse, potentially shutting down oil production. Gregory Brew of Eurasia Group said, “They're probably several weeks, or perhaps as much as a month, away from running out of storage,” he told Axios.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/top-idf-general-warns-jewish-terrorism-in-west-bank-could-trigger-palestinian-uprising-1777666063459/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/top-idf-general-warns-jewish-terrorism-in-west-bank-could-trigger-palestinian-uprising-1777666063459/embed</a>&nbsp;Pentagon spokesperson Joel Valdez said the blockade is fully active. “We are inflicting a devastating blow to the Iranian regime's ability to fund terrorism and regional destabilization,” he said. “Our armed forces in the region will continue to maintain this unrelenting pressure.”&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US blockade in Gulf of Oman blocks Iran oil shipments, trapping billions in crude and escalating pressure on Tehran amid ongoing geopolitical conflict

The US Defense Department estimates that Iran has lost nearly $5 billion in oil revenue due to a US blockade in the Gulf of Oman, intensifying economic pressure on Tehran. Officials say the blockade is President Donald Trump’s most powerful tool to push negotiations aimed at ending the war with Iran, even as diplomatic talks continue to stall and restart. Since the operation started on April 13, the US military has redirected more than 40 vessels attempting to move oil and other contraband through the region, according to Pentagon officials. In total, 31 tankers carrying approximately 53 million barrels of Iranian crude are now ‘stuck in the Gulf’, valued at around $4.8 billion. Two vessels have already been seized by US forces. With storage capacity on land reaching its limits, Iran has reportedly started using older tankers as floating storage units. Some shipments are now taking longer, more expensive routes to reach buyers in China, partly to avoid US interception. Shipping analysts note that Iranian tankers have adapted by hugging coastlines near Pakistan and India, using safer maritime corridors toward the Strait of Malacca, where oil is often transferred between vessels bound for China. Also Read: US to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany as Trump's feud with Merz intensifies Samir Madani, co-founder of TankerTrackers.com, said one Iranian tanker, nicknamed “HUGE,” demonstrated how ships attempt to evade interception. He said vessels are increasingly relying on stealth routing through regional waters. Madani also warned that Iran may eventually attempt a large-scale breakout. “I think the Iranians will wait for an opportunity to launch an overnight 'Great Escape' once they have built up even further storage near the border with Pakistan,” he told Axios. The situation reflects a broader economic confrontation, with both Iran and the United States using maritime pressure tactics. Iran has previously restricted movement through the Strait of Hormuz, while the US has increased pressure at the Gulf of Oman entry point. Analysts say the strategy is aimed at forcing Iran’s storage capacity to collapse, potentially shutting down oil production. Gregory Brew of Eurasia Group said, “They're probably several weeks, or perhaps as much as a month, away from running out of storage,” he told Axios. https://www.wionews.com/videos/top-idf-general-warns-jewish-terrorism-in-west-bank-could-trigger-palestinian-uprising-1777666063459/embed Pentagon spokesperson Joel Valdez said the blockade is fully active. “We are inflicting a devastating blow to the Iranian regime's ability to fund terrorism and regional destabilization,” he said. “Our armed forces in the region will continue to maintain this unrelenting pressure.” Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

The US blockade in the Gulf of Oman blocks Iran's oil exports, trapping billions in cargo and intensifying economic pressure during the ongoing conflict

Pentagon says US blockade has cost Iran $4.8 billion in oil losses

The United States on Friday (May 1) imposed sanctions on a Chinese oil terminal as part of a broader set of new measures targeting Iran, while warning of consequences for vessels paying ‘tolls’ demanded by Tehran. The move comes amid stalled diplomacy following President Donald Trump’s decision to halt US-Israeli attacks on Iran. The announcement also arrives just two weeks before Trump is scheduled to visit China, a major buyer of Iranian oil. Since Trump’s first term, the United States has unilaterally sought to prevent other countries from purchasing oil from Iran, whose leadership remains strongly opposed to both the US and Israel.&nbsp;The State Department confirmed sanctions on Qingdao Haiye Oil Terminal Co., Ltd., alleging it imported ‘tens of millions of barrels’ of Iranian crude, generating billions in revenue for Tehran. "So long as Iran attempts to generate oil revenues to fund its destabilizing activities, the United States will hold both Iran and all its sanctions-evading partners accountable," the State Department said. The sanctions effectively criminalize transactions involving the United States through the terminal operator, which is part of the major port hub in Qingdao along the Yellow Sea.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-hostilities-have-terminated-trump-tells-congress-ahead-of-war-powers-deadline-1777662508121">'Hostilities have terminated': Trump tells Congress ahead of War Powers deadline</a>&nbsp;Previously, the US imposed similar restrictions on Qingdao Port Haiye Dongjiakou Oil Products Co. in the same region. Global oil prices have surged following US-Israeli strikes, after Iran responded by nearly blocking the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global energy shipments. Iran has demanded the lifting of US sanctions and a naval blockade, and has pledged to enforce "tolls" on ships passing through the Strait, drawing strong objections from Trump.&nbsp;The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued a warning about the risks of making payments to Iran for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Additionally, sanctions were imposed on three Iranian currency exchange firms accused of converting oil revenues into usable foreign currencies. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that authorities would "relentlessly target the regime's ability to generate, move, and repatriate funds, and pursue anyone enabling Tehran's attempts to evade sanctions."&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/earth-being-observed-by-aliens-claims-ex-us-admiral-1777658407870/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/earth-being-observed-by-aliens-claims-ex-us-admiral-1777658407870/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US sanctions Chinese oil terminal tied to Iran, warns ships over Hormuz tolls, escalating tensions and targeting Tehran’s oil revenue network

The United States on Friday (May 1) imposed sanctions on a Chinese oil terminal as part of a broader set of new measures targeting Iran, while warning of consequences for vessels paying ‘tolls’ demanded by Tehran. The move comes amid stalled diplomacy following President Donald Trump’s decision to halt US-Israeli attacks on Iran. The announcement also arrives just two weeks before Trump is scheduled to visit China, a major buyer of Iranian oil. Since Trump’s first term, the United States has unilaterally sought to prevent other countries from purchasing oil from Iran, whose leadership remains strongly opposed to both the US and Israel. The State Department confirmed sanctions on Qingdao Haiye Oil Terminal Co., Ltd., alleging it imported ‘tens of millions of barrels’ of Iranian crude, generating billions in revenue for Tehran. "So long as Iran attempts to generate oil revenues to fund its destabilizing activities, the United States will hold both Iran and all its sanctions-evading partners accountable," the State Department said. The sanctions effectively criminalize transactions involving the United States through the terminal operator, which is part of the major port hub in Qingdao along the Yellow Sea. Also Read: 'Hostilities have terminated': Trump tells Congress ahead of War Powers deadline Previously, the US imposed similar restrictions on Qingdao Port Haiye Dongjiakou Oil Products Co. in the same region. Global oil prices have surged following US-Israeli strikes, after Iran responded by nearly blocking the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global energy shipments. Iran has demanded the lifting of US sanctions and a naval blockade, and has pledged to enforce "tolls" on ships passing through the Strait, drawing strong objections from Trump. The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued a warning about the risks of making payments to Iran for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Additionally, sanctions were imposed on three Iranian currency exchange firms accused of converting oil revenues into usable foreign currencies. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that authorities would "relentlessly target the regime's ability to generate, move, and repatriate funds, and pursue anyone enabling Tehran's attempts to evade sanctions." https://www.wionews.com/videos/earth-being-observed-by-aliens-claims-ex-us-admiral-1777658407870/embed Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US sanctions Chinese oil terminal over Iran trade, warns ships over Hormuz ‘tolls’, escalating pressure amid stalled diplomacy and rising tensions

US sanctions Chinese oil terminal over Iran trade, warns on Hormuz 'tolls'

US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 1) informed congressional leaders that ‘hostilities’ with Iran have officially ‘terminated’, addressing a key 60-day deadline under a law designed to limit unauthorised military action. "There has been no exchange of fire between the United States Forces and Iran since April 7, 2026," Trump wrote in nearly identical letters to House Speaker Mike Johnson and GOP Senator Chuck Grassley, the president pro tempore of the Senate. "The hostilities that began on February 28, 2026, have terminated."&nbsp;The issue revives a long-standing constitutional debate. The framers of the US Constitution granted Congress the authority to declare war, and nearly 250 years later, that power is once again under scrutiny. At the center of the matter is the War Powers Resolution, enacted after the Vietnam War to limit presidential war-making powers and ensure congressional oversight of extended military engagements. As the conflict with Iran reached a critical juncture, the law’s scope and ambiguities have been tested in real time.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-expands-us-sanctions-on-cuban-government-targets-key-sectors-and-foreign-banks-1777660801491">Trump announces US sanctions on Cuban government; targets key sectors and foreign banks</a>&nbsp;The conflict started on February 28, when US forces, alongside Israel, launched large-scale strikes on Iranian targets, triggering a broader regional escalation. In response, Iran retaliated, global energy markets faced disruption, and the Republican-controlled Congress showed reluctance to assert its constitutional authority. Under the War Powers Resolution, a president can initiate military action without prior approval but must notify Congress within 48 hours and end hostilities within 60 days unless lawmakers grant an extension.&nbsp;&nbsp;That 60-day deadline, triggered by Trump’s March 2 notification, expired on Friday, intensifying political tensions in Washington. An increasing number of Republican lawmakers have called on the administration to scale back operations against Iran. Others are reportedly working on legislation that would formally authorise the use of military force, effectively sidestepping the debate over the War Powers Resolution.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/west-bengal-election-repolling-at-15-booths-on-may-2-1777654405754/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/west-bengal-election-repolling-at-15-booths-on-may-2-1777654405754/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Trump declares Iran hostilities “terminated” as War Powers deadline hits, raising constitutional debate over Congress’s role in US military action

US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 1) informed congressional leaders that ‘hostilities’ with Iran have officially ‘terminated’, addressing a key 60-day deadline under a law designed to limit unauthorised military action. "There has been no exchange of fire between the United States Forces and Iran since April 7, 2026," Trump wrote in nearly identical letters to House Speaker Mike Johnson and GOP Senator Chuck Grassley, the president pro tempore of the Senate. "The hostilities that began on February 28, 2026, have terminated." The issue revives a long-standing constitutional debate. The framers of the US Constitution granted Congress the authority to declare war, and nearly 250 years later, that power is once again under scrutiny. At the center of the matter is the War Powers Resolution, enacted after the Vietnam War to limit presidential war-making powers and ensure congressional oversight of extended military engagements. As the conflict with Iran reached a critical juncture, the law’s scope and ambiguities have been tested in real time. Also Read: Trump announces US sanctions on Cuban government; targets key sectors and foreign banks The conflict started on February 28, when US forces, alongside Israel, launched large-scale strikes on Iranian targets, triggering a broader regional escalation. In response, Iran retaliated, global energy markets faced disruption, and the Republican-controlled Congress showed reluctance to assert its constitutional authority. Under the War Powers Resolution, a president can initiate military action without prior approval but must notify Congress within 48 hours and end hostilities within 60 days unless lawmakers grant an extension. That 60-day deadline, triggered by Trump’s March 2 notification, expired on Friday, intensifying political tensions in Washington. An increasing number of Republican lawmakers have called on the administration to scale back operations against Iran. Others are reportedly working on legislation that would formally authorise the use of military force, effectively sidestepping the debate over the War Powers Resolution. https://www.wionews.com/videos/west-bengal-election-repolling-at-15-booths-on-may-2-1777654405754/embed Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US President Donald Trump says Iran ‘hostilities’ have ‘terminated’ as the 60-day War Powers deadline passes, sparking debate over Congress’s authority on military action

'Hostilities have terminated': Trump tells Congress ahead of War Powers deadline

US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 1) suggested that he was unhappy with the new proposal from Iran amid stalled peace talks. He also threatened to “blast them to hell” if Tehran fails to strike a deal with Washington. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said that he was “not satisfied” with what the Iranians were offering at the moment. This comes after Iranian state media reported that Tehran had delivered a new proposal to Pakistan on Thursday evening.“At this moment I’m not satisfied with what they’re offering,” Trump said. When asked why was he unsatisfied with the Iranian proposal, Trump responded, “They’re asking for things that I can’t agree.” The US president did not give details on what things the Iranians were asking.Trump also said that Iran had “made strides” in the discussions, but added that there was “tremendous discord” in the Islamic Republic’s leadership. He said, “I’m not sure if they ever get there.”When asked what he would do if Iran fails to strike a deal, Trump said, “Do we want to go and just blast the hell out of them and finish them forever – or do we want to try and make a deal? I mean, those are the options.”The Republican president added that he would “prefer not” to launch a huge offensive against Tehran, but warned, “That’s the option: do we want to go in there heavy and just blast them away or do we want to do something?”Trump was also questioned about exceeding the 60-day deadline under the War Powers Act to secure congressional approval for the war, but he argued that requiring such approval was “totally unconstitutional.”“Also, we had a ceasefire so that gives you additional time, but no other country has done it,” he said. "We’re in the midst of a big victory. This is a victory like we haven’t had since Venezuela.” He was referring to the US ouster of Nicolas Maduro in January. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump said he’s unhappy with Iran’s latest proposal and warned of severe military action if no deal is reached, citing unacceptable demands from Tehran amid stalled negotiations.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 1) suggested that he was unhappy with the new proposal from Iran amid stalled peace talks. He also threatened to “blast them to hell” if Tehran fails to strike a deal with Washington. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said that he was “not satisfied” with what the Iranians were offering at the moment. This comes after Iranian state media reported that Tehran had delivered a new proposal to Pakistan on Thursday evening. “At this moment I’m not satisfied with what they’re offering,” Trump said. When asked why was he unsatisfied with the Iranian proposal, Trump responded, “They’re asking for things that I can’t agree.” The US president did not give details on what things the Iranians were asking. Trump also said that Iran had “made strides” in the discussions, but added that there was “tremendous discord” in the Islamic Republic’s leadership. He said, “I’m not sure if they ever get there.” When asked what he would do if Iran fails to strike a deal, Trump said, “Do we want to go and just blast the hell out of them and finish them forever – or do we want to try and make a deal? I mean, those are the options.” The Republican president added that he would “prefer not” to launch a huge offensive against Tehran, but warned, “That’s the option: do we want to go in there heavy and just blast them away or do we want to do something?” Trump was also questioned about exceeding the 60-day deadline under the War Powers Act to secure congressional approval for the war, but he argued that requiring such approval was “totally unconstitutional.” “Also, we had a ceasefire so that gives you additional time, but no other country has done it,” he said. "We’re in the midst of a big victory. This is a victory like we haven’t had since Venezuela.” He was referring to the US ouster of Nicolas Maduro in January. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

US President Donald Trump said he’s unhappy with Iran’s latest proposal and warned of severe military action if no deal is reached, citing unacceptable demands from Tehran amid stalled negotiations.

‘Blast them to hell’: Trump threatens Iran to strike a deal, says ‘not satisfied’ with new proposal

US President Donald Trump has intensified pressure on Iran, declaring that Washington will obtain Tehran’s enriched uranium “one way or the other.” Trump also left the door open to restarting military action if negotiations collapse, escalating fears of a renewed regional conflict. The remarks come amid a prolonged standoff over Iran’s nuclear programme, rising tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, and growing uncertainty in global energy markets.


US-Iran War: Trump Briefed On 'Special Forces Mission' To Secure Uranium Stockpile 

US President Donald Trump, on Thursday, April 30, indicated that he was open to the “probability” of reducing US troop levels in Italy and Spain, rebuking both countries on their stance on US operations against Iran and their support for opening the Strait of Hormuz. Speaking to the reporters at the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump said, “Yeah, probably, I probably will. Why shouldn’t I?” This comes just after a similar remark made by Trump at another one of the US's traditional NATO allies, Germany.&nbsp;Italy has not been of any help to us, and Spain has been horrible, absolutely horrible,” Trump told reporters. He further added that the US has been helping them with Ukraine, when Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine is primarily a NATO concern.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-condemns-israel-attack-global-sumud-flotilla-crete-2026-1777612677722">Iran condemns Israel’s attack on Global Sumud Flotilla, calls it ‘piracy’ in international waters</a><h2>&nbsp;Strained transatlantic capitalist alliance</h2>The rift between US President Donald Trump and his NATO allies continues to widen as Spain has emerged as the vocal critic of the US-Israel operation in Iran. It denied access to its bases to the US for operations against Iran, enraging the Trump administration. Similarly, Germany, Spain, and the UK all opposed the Israeli death penalty bill for its Palestinian prisoners and also opposed Israel's expansion in the West Bank. The Transatlantic capitalist alliance was further in shambles when Georgia Meloni criticised US President Donald Trump's controversial feud and social media post on Pope Leo XVI.On Wednesday, Trump said that the US is considering a reduction of troops in Germany following German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's dig suggesting that the US is being humiliated in the negotiations with Iran. This is not the first time Trump tried to scale back the US presence in Germany; he made a similar attempt in 2020, which was blocked by Congress. Germany has the largest military presence in the region at around 36,436 American personnel as of 2025. Germany has denied any concerns regarding the withdrawal of US troops, suggesting that the bases are vital to US security.&nbsp;

Donald Trump hints at reducing US troops in Italy and Spain as tensions grow over Iran policy, NATO divisions, and disagreements on Israel-related issues.

US President Donald Trump, on Thursday, April 30, indicated that he was open to the “probability” of reducing US troop levels in Italy and Spain, rebuking both countries on their stance on US operations against Iran and their support for opening the Strait of Hormuz. Speaking to the reporters at the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump said, “Yeah, probably, I probably will. Why shouldn’t I?” This comes just after a similar remark made by Trump at another one of the US's traditional NATO allies, Germany. Italy has not been of any help to us, and Spain has been horrible, absolutely horrible,” Trump told reporters. He further added that the US has been helping them with Ukraine, when Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine is primarily a NATO concern. Also Read: Iran condemns Israel’s attack on Global Sumud Flotilla, calls it ‘piracy’ in international waters Strained transatlantic capitalist alliance The rift between US President Donald Trump and his NATO allies continues to widen as Spain has emerged as the vocal critic of the US-Israel operation in Iran. It denied access to its bases to the US for operations against Iran, enraging the Trump administration. Similarly, Germany, Spain, and the UK all opposed the Israeli death penalty bill for its Palestinian prisoners and also opposed Israel's expansion in the West Bank. The Transatlantic capitalist alliance was further in shambles when Georgia Meloni criticised US President Donald Trump's controversial feud and social media post on Pope Leo XVI. On Wednesday, Trump said that the US is considering a reduction of troops in Germany following German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's dig suggesting that the US is being humiliated in the negotiations with Iran. This is not the first time Trump tried to scale back the US presence in Germany; he made a similar attempt in 2020, which was blocked by Congress. Germany has the largest military presence in the region at around 36,436 American personnel as of 2025. Germany has denied any concerns regarding the withdrawal of US troops, suggesting that the bases are vital to US security.

Donald Trump hints at reducing US troops in Italy and Spain as tensions grow over Iran policy, NATO divisions, and disagreements on Israel-related issues.

Trump signals US troop cuts in Italy, Spain amid rift over Iran operations

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress on Thursday (April 30) that President Donald Trump is not obligated to comply with a law requiring presidents to seek congressional approval to continue a war beyond 60 days, arguing that the cease-fire agreement with Iran has effectively paused the clock. His remarks came just ahead of the 60-day deadline from when Trump formally notified Congress of military action, a key requirement under the War Powers Resolution. The law mandates that presidents must either withdraw forces, secure congressional authorisation, or request a 30-day extension after 60 days of engagement.&nbsp;Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, presidents must notify Congress within 48 hours of initiating military action and withdraw troops within 60 days unless lawmakers authorize continued use of force. Lawmakers had anticipated that this deadline would expire on Friday (May 1). “We are in a ceasefire right now, which our understanding means the 60-day clock pauses, or stops, in a ceasefire,” Hegseth said during testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. When pressed on whether the administration would seek authorization, he declined to provide a direct answer.&nbsp;Hegseth’s interpretation of the law, viewed by some legal experts as unprecedented, came during his second day of testimony on Capitol Hill, where he defended the administration’s handling of the Iran conflict while requesting support for the Pentagon’s nearly $1.45 trillion budget proposal. “The biggest adversary we face at this point is the reckless naysayers and defeatist words of congressional Democrats and some Republicans,” he said, reiterating comments made during a House hearing a day earlier. While the hearing was officially focused on reviewing the record-breaking defense budget, it also marked the first opportunity for senators to publicly question Hegseth since the war started more than eight weeks ago.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-i-own-you-my-little-brown-boy-inside-the-explosive-lawsuit-against-jpmorgan-s-lorna-hajdini-here-s-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-case-1777587887107">‘I own you my little brown boy’: Inside the explosive lawsuit against JPMorgan’s Lorna Hajdini. Here's everything you need to know about the case</a>&nbsp;Lawmakers from both parties have long viewed the 60-day mark as a critical legal threshold for the administration. “It’s going to pose a really important legal question for the administration,” said Senator Tim Kaine. “We have serious constitutional concerns.” Some Republicans, including Senators John Curtis and Thom Tillis, have signaled they would oppose continuing the military campaign without congressional approval after the deadline. Others, however, have advocated for flexibility.&nbsp;Representative Brian Fitzpatrick recently introduced a resolution proposing that days under a cease-fire or active negotiations should not count toward the 60-day limit.Legal scholars across the political spectrum rejected Hegseth’s claim. “It’s a legal stretch to say that hostilities are not ongoing when US warships are blockading the Strait of Hormuz and firing on Iranian vessels,” said John B. Bellinger III. “There continues to be a clear and present danger of armed conflict for US forces.”“There is no pause button in the War Powers Resolution,” added Harold Hongju Koh.&nbsp;Since the early days of the conflict, Democrats have accused the administration of initiating war without an imminent threat and have demanded greater transparency from the Pentagon. The conflict has triggered retaliatory attacks across the region and driven up energy prices in the United States. Hegseth, however, pushed back strongly against criticism, accusing lawmakers of prematurely labeling the effort a failure. “I would remind you and this group that we’re two months into an effort,” he said. “And many congressional Democrats, as I pointed out, want to declare defeat.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-football-chief-denied-entry-to-canada-ahead-of-fifa-event-1777576095399/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-football-chief-denied-entry-to-canada-ahead-of-fifa-event-1777576095399/embed</a>&nbsp;The tone marked a departure from earlier messaging by the administration, which had suggested the conflict would be brief. Senator Elissa Slotkin questioned the administration’s claims of progress, saying, “We can try and tell the American people that it’s going great and we’re killing it. But until the Strait of Hormuz is open, I don’t think we can credibly say that with any seriousness.”&nbsp;Hegseth responded sharply: “It’s defeatist Democrats like you that cloud the mind of the American people and would otherwise fully support preventing Iran from having a nuclear weapon.” At one point, Senator Roger Wicker intervened to urge Hegseth to directly answer lawmakers’ questions. In contrast, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, adopted a more measured tone during the hearing. “I apologize,” General Caine said after briefly interrupting a senator. “I didn’t mean to interrupt you.”&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says Iran ceasefire pauses the war powers clock, drawing sharp legal criticism and raising questions over Trump’s war authority

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress on Thursday (April 30) that President Donald Trump is not obligated to comply with a law requiring presidents to seek congressional approval to continue a war beyond 60 days, arguing that the cease-fire agreement with Iran has effectively paused the clock. His remarks came just ahead of the 60-day deadline from when Trump formally notified Congress of military action, a key requirement under the War Powers Resolution. The law mandates that presidents must either withdraw forces, secure congressional authorisation, or request a 30-day extension after 60 days of engagement. Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, presidents must notify Congress within 48 hours of initiating military action and withdraw troops within 60 days unless lawmakers authorize continued use of force. Lawmakers had anticipated that this deadline would expire on Friday (May 1). “We are in a ceasefire right now, which our understanding means the 60-day clock pauses, or stops, in a ceasefire,” Hegseth said during testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. When pressed on whether the administration would seek authorization, he declined to provide a direct answer. Hegseth’s interpretation of the law, viewed by some legal experts as unprecedented, came during his second day of testimony on Capitol Hill, where he defended the administration’s handling of the Iran conflict while requesting support for the Pentagon’s nearly $1.45 trillion budget proposal. “The biggest adversary we face at this point is the reckless naysayers and defeatist words of congressional Democrats and some Republicans,” he said, reiterating comments made during a House hearing a day earlier. While the hearing was officially focused on reviewing the record-breaking defense budget, it also marked the first opportunity for senators to publicly question Hegseth since the war started more than eight weeks ago. Also Read: ‘I own you my little brown boy’: Inside the explosive lawsuit against JPMorgan’s Lorna Hajdini. Here's everything you need to know about the case Lawmakers from both parties have long viewed the 60-day mark as a critical legal threshold for the administration. “It’s going to pose a really important legal question for the administration,” said Senator Tim Kaine. “We have serious constitutional concerns.” Some Republicans, including Senators John Curtis and Thom Tillis, have signaled they would oppose continuing the military campaign without congressional approval after the deadline. Others, however, have advocated for flexibility. Representative Brian Fitzpatrick recently introduced a resolution proposing that days under a cease-fire or active negotiations should not count toward the 60-day limit. Legal scholars across the political spectrum rejected Hegseth’s claim. “It’s a legal stretch to say that hostilities are not ongoing when US warships are blockading the Strait of Hormuz and firing on Iranian vessels,” said John B. Bellinger III. “There continues to be a clear and present danger of armed conflict for US forces.” “There is no pause button in the War Powers Resolution,” added Harold Hongju Koh. Since the early days of the conflict, Democrats have accused the administration of initiating war without an imminent threat and have demanded greater transparency from the Pentagon. The conflict has triggered retaliatory attacks across the region and driven up energy prices in the United States. Hegseth, however, pushed back strongly against criticism, accusing lawmakers of prematurely labeling the effort a failure. “I would remind you and this group that we’re two months into an effort,” he said. “And many congressional Democrats, as I pointed out, want to declare defeat.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-football-chief-denied-entry-to-canada-ahead-of-fifa-event-1777576095399/embed The tone marked a departure from earlier messaging by the administration, which had suggested the conflict would be brief. Senator Elissa Slotkin questioned the administration’s claims of progress, saying, “We can try and tell the American people that it’s going great and we’re killing it. But until the Strait of Hormuz is open, I don’t think we can credibly say that with any seriousness.” Hegseth responded sharply: “It’s defeatist Democrats like you that cloud the mind of the American people and would otherwise fully support preventing Iran from having a nuclear weapon.” At one point, Senator Roger Wicker intervened to urge Hegseth to directly answer lawmakers’ questions. In contrast, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, adopted a more measured tone during the hearing. “I apologize,” General Caine said after briefly interrupting a senator. “I didn’t mean to interrupt you.” Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Pete Hegseth says Iran ceasefire pauses war powers clock, sparking legal backlash as Congress questions Donald Trump’s authority to continue the conflict

Hegseth says Iran ceasefire 'stops the clock' for Congressional approval as deadline approaches

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed the idea of effectively blockading Iran, highlighting the country’s vast land and maritime borders in a post on X. “If you build two walls, one from NYC to the West Coast and another from LA to the East Coast, the total length will be 7,755 km, which is still about 1,000 km short of Iran’s total borders,” Ghalibaf wrote. “Good luck blockading a country with those borders,” he added. In a postscript aimed at US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, he wrote, “P.S. For Pete Hegseth: 1 km = 0.62 mi.”&nbsp;Earlier, Ghalibaf also emphasised Iran’s strategic position in the Strait of Hormuz, saying that control of the passage would ensure a future without US presence in the region. “Today, by managing the Strait of Hormuz, Iran will provide itself and its neighbors with the precious blessing of a future free from American presence and interference,” Ghalibaf says in a post on X marking ‘Persian Gulf’ day. Meanwhile, during a Senate hearing, US lawmakers raised concerns about disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and their economic impact. Hegseth responded that the blockade means ‘we control the straits’.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-iran-is-dying-to-make-a-deal-they-cannot-be-nuclear-1777576619856">Trump says, ‘Iran is dying to make a deal, they cannot be nuclear’</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">If you build two walls, one from NYC to the West Coast and another from LA to the East Coast, the total length will be 7,755 km, which is still about 1,000 km short of Iran’s total borders. Good luck blockading a country with those borders😁 P.S. For Pete Hegseth: 1 km = 0.62 mi <a href="https://t.co/MKU2z2Sw5c">pic.twitter.com/MKU2z2Sw5c</a>&mdash; محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) <a href="https://twitter.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2049916076780036547?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 30, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Trump administration pushes global coalition to secure Strait of Hormuz</h2>The Trump administration is urging foreign governments to join a new international coalition to ensure freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, as the ongoing conflict continues to disrupt the vital shipping route. The initiative, called the “Maritime Freedom Construct,” seeks to coordinate diplomatic action, align sanctions policies, and improve intelligence sharing to secure safe passage through the strait. The waterway has become a central flashpoint in tensions between the United States and Iran, with both sides maintaining competing security measures.&nbsp;Trump has repeatedly insisted that the United States can manage the situation independently while also criticizing European allies for not contributing enough. At the same time, global fuel prices have surged due to continued instability in the region. A US State Department cable sent to diplomatic posts this week instructs officials to promote the coalition and seek partner participation by Friday. The cable, reviewed by CNN, also directs diplomats not to engage with US adversaries, including Russia, China, Belarus, and Cuba. The Wall Street Journal first reported details of the directive. According to the cable, the coalition will be coordinated by the State Department and the Pentagon through US Central Command. “The MFC will take steps to ensure safe passage, including providing real-time information, safety guidance, and coordination to ensure vessels can transit these waters securely,” the cable said.&nbsp;It added that countries are encouraged to participate at varying levels depending on their capabilities. “Contributions may include diplomatic coordination, information sharing, sanctions enforcement, naval presence, or other forms of support,” the cable said. “We welcome all levels of engagement and do not expect your country to shift naval assets or resources away from existing maritime constructs.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-plans-hormuz-coalition-as-iran-vows-gulf-free-of-america-1777572473035/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-plans-hormuz-coalition-as-iran-vows-gulf-free-of-america-1777572473035/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Iran Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf mocks US blockade claims, highlights Iran’s borders, and asserts control over the Strait of Hormuz amid tensions

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed the idea of effectively blockading Iran, highlighting the country’s vast land and maritime borders in a post on X. “If you build two walls, one from NYC to the West Coast and another from LA to the East Coast, the total length will be 7,755 km, which is still about 1,000 km short of Iran’s total borders,” Ghalibaf wrote. “Good luck blockading a country with those borders,” he added. In a postscript aimed at US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, he wrote, “P.S. For Pete Hegseth: 1 km = 0.62 mi.” Earlier, Ghalibaf also emphasised Iran’s strategic position in the Strait of Hormuz, saying that control of the passage would ensure a future without US presence in the region. “Today, by managing the Strait of Hormuz, Iran will provide itself and its neighbors with the precious blessing of a future free from American presence and interference,” Ghalibaf says in a post on X marking ‘Persian Gulf’ day. Meanwhile, during a Senate hearing, US lawmakers raised concerns about disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and their economic impact. Hegseth responded that the blockade means ‘we control the straits’. Also Read: Trump says, ‘Iran is dying to make a deal, they cannot be nuclear’

Iranian parliament speaker mocks US blockade claims, cites Iran’s vast borders, and asserts control over the Strait of Hormuz amid escalating US-Iran tensions

Ghalibaf mocks US blockade claims, cites vast borders; says 'Good luck blockading Iran'

US President Donald Trump said on Thursday (April 30) that only a small group of officials is aware of the true status of ongoing talks with Iran, suggesting that negotiations may be progressing despite appearing stalled publicly. “Nobody knows what the talks are, except myself and a couple of other people,” Trump said in the Oval Office, while also pointing to uncertainty within Iran’s leadership. “We have a problem because nobody knows for sure who the leaders are. It’s a little bit of a problem,” he said.&nbsp;Trump maintained that Tehran is eager to reach an agreement and credited recent pressure tactics, including actions involving the Strait of Hormuz, for weakening Iran’s position. Insisting Tehran wanted to make a deal ‘badly’, Trump said his blockade of the Strait of Hormuz was working as planned. “Their economy is crashing. The blockade is incredible. The power of the blockade is incredible,” he said. Trump also appeared to downplay the likelihood of escalating military action, signaling uncertainty over whether further steps would be necessary. “I don’t know that we need it. We might need it,” he said. Speaking on the increasing prices of gas, Trump said, “Gas prices will go down as soon as the Iran war is over.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-announces-to-lift-tariffs-on-scotland-kentucky-whiskey-ties-after-royal-visit-1777575193285">Trump announces to lift tariffs on Scotland-Kentucky whiskey ties after royal visit</a><h2>US naval blockade ‘an extension of military action: Pezeshkian&nbsp;</h2>Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Thursday (April 30) strongly criticized the United States over its naval actions in the Strait of Hormuz, saying the measures amount to ongoing military pressure against Iran. In an English-language post on X, Pezeshkian wrote, “What is being done under the guise of a naval blockade is an extension of military operations against a nation paying the price for its resistance and independence.” “Continuation of this oppressive approach is intolerable,” he added. His remarks followed comments from US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said the Trump administration does not require congressional approval to engage in military action against Iran.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-mocks-trump-oil-warning-as-blockade-tensions-push-crude-toward-140-1777571071243/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-mocks-trump-oil-warning-as-blockade-tensions-push-crude-toward-140-1777571071243/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Donald Trump says Iran talks are progressing privately, highlights Strait of Hormuz blockade impact, and signals uncertainty on further military action

US President Donald Trump said on Thursday (April 30) that only a small group of officials is aware of the true status of ongoing talks with Iran, suggesting that negotiations may be progressing despite appearing stalled publicly. “Nobody knows what the talks are, except myself and a couple of other people,” Trump said in the Oval Office, while also pointing to uncertainty within Iran’s leadership. “We have a problem because nobody knows for sure who the leaders are. It’s a little bit of a problem,” he said. Trump maintained that Tehran is eager to reach an agreement and credited recent pressure tactics, including actions involving the Strait of Hormuz, for weakening Iran’s position. Insisting Tehran wanted to make a deal ‘badly’, Trump said his blockade of the Strait of Hormuz was working as planned. “Their economy is crashing. The blockade is incredible. The power of the blockade is incredible,” he said. Trump also appeared to downplay the likelihood of escalating military action, signaling uncertainty over whether further steps would be necessary. “I don’t know that we need it. We might need it,” he said. Speaking on the increasing prices of gas, Trump said, “Gas prices will go down as soon as the Iran war is over.” Also Read: Trump announces to lift tariffs on Scotland-Kentucky whiskey ties after royal visit US naval blockade ‘an extension of military action: Pezeshkian Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Thursday (April 30) strongly criticized the United States over its naval actions in the Strait of Hormuz, saying the measures amount to ongoing military pressure against Iran. In an English-language post on X, Pezeshkian wrote, “What is being done under the guise of a naval blockade is an extension of military operations against a nation paying the price for its resistance and independence.” “Continuation of this oppressive approach is intolerable,” he added. His remarks followed comments from US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said the Trump administration does not require congressional approval to engage in military action against Iran. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-mocks-trump-oil-warning-as-blockade-tensions-push-crude-toward-140-1777571071243/embed Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Donald Trump on Thursday said Iran talks are known only to a few, claims the Hormuz blockade is working, and signals uncertainty over further military action

Trump says, 'Iran is dying to make a deal, they cannot be nuclear'

The US Department of Defence has put the cost of its ongoing war with Iran at $25 billion, but analysts and lawmakers have raised doubts about the accuracy of the figure, suggesting it may significantly underestimate the true expense.&nbsp;Speaking at a congressional hearing on Wednesday, Pentagon officials said the conflict has so far cost $25 billion. However, according to a report by Bloomberg, the estimate has been met with scepticism, with experts arguing that key components of the war’s cost may have been excluded.&nbsp;Based on Pentagon data, Bloomberg calculated that a portion of the expenses covering munitions, damaged equipment and operational costs alone could reach $14 billion. This includes roughly $8 billion for munitions, $5 billion to replace damaged aircraft and equipment, and about $1 billion for operating aircraft carriers and 16 destroyers deployed in the region since the war began on February 28.&nbsp;Crucially, the Pentagon’s $25 billion estimate does not appear to include several major cost factors. These include repairs to US military facilities in West Asia that were damaged during the conflict, operational expenses incurred before February 28, and the ongoing costs of a US naval blockade in the region.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/what-happened-when-pete-hegseth-was-asked-if-trump-is-mentally-stable-enough-to-be-commander-in-chief-in-pics-1777535966899">What happened when Pete Hegseth was asked if Trump is 'mentally stable'?</a>&nbsp;Pentagon acting comptroller Jules Hurst said the figure presented to Congress accounted for used munitions and operational costs, but he did not provide a detailed breakdown during the hearing.<h2>‘Low-ball figure’, say experts</h2>Analysts have described the estimate as incomplete. Stimson Centre senior fellow Kelly Grieco said the figure excludes key elements such as base damage, broader operating costs and rising fuel expenses. “The Pentagon’s $25 billion figure is clearly a narrow accounting of what it cost to fight the war,” Grieco was quoted as saying by Bloomberg.&nbsp;The Centre for Strategic and International Studies has suggested that the cost of munitions alone could reach $25 billion. Meanwhile, Senator Richard Blumenthal said he had previously been given estimates of $2 billion per day for the war, which he described as a “low-ball figure”.<h2>Hegseth faces scrutiny in Congress</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-nato-iran-ukraine-king-charles-us-troops-germany-1777529819426">Trump criticises NATO on Iran, Ukraine support, praises King Charles</a>&nbsp;US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared before Congress for the first time since the war began, during a nearly six-hour hearing of the House Armed Services Committee on April 29. The session, which also focused on the Trump administration’s proposed $1.5 trillion defence budget, saw Hegseth face questions from both Democrats and some Republicans over the cost of the conflict and its impact on US munitions stockpiles.&nbsp;Hegseth declined to specify how long the war could continue or how much more it might cost. He also said that a strike on an elementary school in Minab, where more than 150 children were reported killed, remains under investigation. The defence secretary is scheduled to return for a second day of hearings on Thursday (April 30).

CENTCOM will brief President Trump on military options against Iran, including infrastructure strikes and seizing the Strait of Hormuz, as JD Vance warns of potential intelligence optimism and rising costs.

The US Department of Defence has put the cost of its ongoing war with Iran at $25 billion, but analysts and lawmakers have raised doubts about the accuracy of the figure, suggesting it may significantly underestimate the true expense. Speaking at a congressional hearing on Wednesday, Pentagon officials said the conflict has so far cost $25 billion. However, according to a report by Bloomberg, the estimate has been met with scepticism, with experts arguing that key components of the war’s cost may have been excluded. Based on Pentagon data, Bloomberg calculated that a portion of the expenses covering munitions, damaged equipment and operational costs alone could reach $14 billion. This includes roughly $8 billion for munitions, $5 billion to replace damaged aircraft and equipment, and about $1 billion for operating aircraft carriers and 16 destroyers deployed in the region since the war began on February 28. Crucially, the Pentagon’s $25 billion estimate does not appear to include several major cost factors. These include repairs to US military facilities in West Asia that were damaged during the conflict, operational expenses incurred before February 28, and the ongoing costs of a US naval blockade in the region. Also read: What happened when Pete Hegseth was asked if Trump is 'mentally stable'? Pentagon acting comptroller Jules Hurst said the figure presented to Congress accounted for used munitions and operational costs, but he did not provide a detailed breakdown during the hearing. ‘Low-ball figure’, say experts Analysts have described the estimate as incomplete. Stimson Centre senior fellow Kelly Grieco said the figure excludes key elements such as base damage, broader operating costs and rising fuel expenses. “The Pentagon’s $25 billion figure is clearly a narrow accounting of what it cost to fight the war,” Grieco was quoted as saying by Bloomberg. The Centre for Strategic and International Studies has suggested that the cost of munitions alone could reach $25 billion. Meanwhile, Senator Richard Blumenthal said he had previously been given estimates of $2 billion per day for the war, which he described as a “low-ball figure”. Hegseth faces scrutiny in Congress Also read: Trump criticises NATO on Iran, Ukraine support, praises King Charles US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared before Congress for the first time since the war began, during a nearly six-hour hearing of the House Armed Services Committee on April 29. The session, which also focused on the Trump administration’s proposed $1.5 trillion defence budget, saw Hegseth face questions from both Democrats and some Republicans over the cost of the conflict and its impact on US munitions stockpiles. Hegseth declined to specify how long the war could continue or how much more it might cost. He also said that a strike on an elementary school in Minab, where more than 150 children were reported killed, remains under investigation. The defence secretary is scheduled to return for a second day of hearings on Thursday (April 30).

CENTCOM will brief President Trump on military options against Iran, including infrastructure strikes and seizing the Strait of Hormuz, as JD Vance warns of potential intelligence optimism and rising costs.

How much US has spent on Iran war? Pentagon says $25bn BUT experts call it ‘narrow accounting’

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday claimed that Iran is in a “state of collapse” and has sought American assistance to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said Iran had informed Washington of its internal crisis and was requesting the reopening of the strategic waterway “as soon as possible”.


US-Iran War: Trump Extends Iran Blockade As Hormuz Crisis Deepens, Oil Prices Surge

The US has spent about $25B in its conflict with Iran, but reports suggest the real cost, factoring in damaged bases, weapons, and repairs, could reach $40–50B. Missile use, infrastructure losses, and rising regional tensions are deepening economic and energy crises.

The US has spent about $25B in its conflict with Iran, but reports suggest the real cost, factoring in damaged bases, weapons, and repairs, could reach $40–50B. Missile use, infrastructure losses, and rising regional tensions are deepening economic and energy crises.

$25B, $40B, $50B or more: Is US hiding its real spending on Iran conflict? Here's what we know

US commanders are reportedly set to present US President Donald Trump with a “short and powerful” plan for potential military action against Iran, even as tensions remain high and negotiations remain stalled. The briefing, scheduled for Thursday (April 30) and led by US Central Command chief Brad Cooper, underscores that the White House is still considering military options to break the deadlock or deliver a decisive blow before ending the conflict.&nbsp;Sources familiar with the matter told Axios that the proposal includes a targeted operation focusing on key infrastructure, designed to shift momentum after multiple failed rounds of talks. Among the options to be presented is a plan to seize control of parts of the Strait of Hormuz in order to restore commercial shipping. Such a move could require the deployment of ground forces and significantly escalate the conflict. Another proposal involves a special forces mission to secure Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium.&nbsp;Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine is also expected to attend the high-level briefing, the report said. Military officials are weighing the risk of retaliation, warning that Tehran could target US forces in the region if a blockade or strike is carried out.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jonathon-ross-ice-agent-resumes-duty-renee-good-minneapolis-investigation-stalled-1777535084892">ICE agent Jonathon Ross resumes duty as probe into Renee Good killing stalls</a>&nbsp;The developments come a day after Trump instructed aides to prepare for an extended blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which he views as a central strategy to increase pressure on Iran by restricting its oil exports and commercial shipping. While other options, such as halting the war or resuming large-scale bombing, were considered, sources indicated that the president sees the blockade as carrying a comparatively lower risk. However, he has not ruled out military action if Iran continues to resist.&nbsp;Concerns have also emerged within the administration. Vice President JD Vance is reportedly worried that the Pentagon may be presenting an overly optimistic picture of the conflict. According to a report by The Atlantic, Vance has questioned the accuracy of briefings and expressed concern that Trump is being shown only short summaries that portray US operations as more successful than they may be. He has also raised alarms about the potential depletion of US missile stockpiles if the conflict continues.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/face-to-face-erika-kirk-reveals-aggressive-reason-she-attended-the-whcd-where-allen-cole-tried-to-assassinate-trump-watch-1777529423108">Erika Kirk REVEALS real reason she attended WH Correspondent's Dinner | Watch</a>&nbsp;Meanwhile, the financial cost of the war continues to mount. A senior Pentagon official said the US has spent approximately $25 billion on the conflict so far, with a significant portion allocated to ammunition. The war, now in its 8th week as of Thursday (April 30), remains at a fragile stage, with a tenuous ceasefire in place, heightened tensions over a possible blockade, and no active negotiations underway.

US commanders are reportedly set to present US President Donald Trump with a “short and powerful” plan for potential military action against Iran, even as tensions remain high and negotiations remain stalled. The briefing, scheduled for Thursday (April 30) and led by US Central Command chief Brad Cooper, underscores that the White House is still considering military options to break the deadlock or deliver a decisive blow before ending the conflict. Sources familiar with the matter told Axios that the proposal includes a targeted operation focusing on key infrastructure, designed to shift momentum after multiple failed rounds of talks. Among the options to be presented is a plan to seize control of parts of the Strait of Hormuz in order to restore commercial shipping. Such a move could require the deployment of ground forces and significantly escalate the conflict. Another proposal involves a special forces mission to secure Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine is also expected to attend the high-level briefing, the report said. Military officials are weighing the risk of retaliation, warning that Tehran could target US forces in the region if a blockade or strike is carried out. Also read: ICE agent Jonathon Ross resumes duty as probe into Renee Good killing stalls The developments come a day after Trump instructed aides to prepare for an extended blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which he views as a central strategy to increase pressure on Iran by restricting its oil exports and commercial shipping. While other options, such as halting the war or resuming large-scale bombing, were considered, sources indicated that the president sees the blockade as carrying a comparatively lower risk. However, he has not ruled out military action if Iran continues to resist. Concerns have also emerged within the administration. Vice President JD Vance is reportedly worried that the Pentagon may be presenting an overly optimistic picture of the conflict. According to a report by The Atlantic, Vance has questioned the accuracy of briefings and expressed concern that Trump is being shown only short summaries that portray US operations as more successful than they may be. He has also raised alarms about the potential depletion of US missile stockpiles if the conflict continues. Also read: Erika Kirk REVEALS real reason she attended WH Correspondent's Dinner | Watch Meanwhile, the financial cost of the war continues to mount. A senior Pentagon official said the US has spent approximately $25 billion on the conflict so far, with a significant portion allocated to ammunition. The war, now in its 8th week as of Thursday (April 30), remains at a fragile stage, with a tenuous ceasefire in place, heightened tensions over a possible blockade, and no active negotiations underway.

US-Iran truce soon? US military to present 3 new plans to Trump, says report

The war in West Asia and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz propelled a stinging disruption in supply chains, impairing industrial competitiveness, inflating household expenditures, and destabilising domestic order. Countries in the subcontinent are net importers of hydrocarbons from West Asia, with the Strait of Hormuz serving as a critical conduit. Since the beginning of the war, Sri Lanka has re-launched the National Fuel Authorisation System to ration fuel supplies. In Pakistan, supply chain disruptions have hamstrung fertiliser reserves in the kharif season, impacting agricultural productivity and food security. The subcontinent’s landlocked small states—Bhutan and Nepal—depend on India for hydrocarbon imports and, thereby, are experiencing second-order vulnerability.&nbsp;While the crisis has amplified the subcontinent’s economic and political predicaments, it opened a window for a reset in the bilateral relations of India and Bangladesh. In March, Bangladesh imposed rationing amid stockpiling and panic-buying. Three of its largest sources of hydrocarbon and aluminium imports—Qatar, Iraq, and the UAE—declared force majeure on production, after Iran targeted their energy infrastructure. Last month, amid public anxiety, Bangladesh received 5000 tonnes of diesel via the Indo-Bangladesh Friendship Pipeline. An additional 5000 tonnes arrived on April 10, while the government is expected to import another 17000 tonnes to assuage concerns.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-sheikh-hasina-and-her-awami-league-find-space-in-tarique-rahman-s-new-bangladesh-amid-jamaat-s-rise-1771229273915">Will Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League find space in Tarique Rahman’s ‘new Bangladesh’ amid Jamaat’s rise?</a>&nbsp;Apart from Bangladesh, India has supplied 38000 metric tonnes of oil products to Sri Lanka and has continued uninterrupted deliveries to Bhutan and Nepal. Similar requests from Malé are also being considered. But the uniqueness of the Bangladeshi case is lent primarily by the trajectory of Indo-Bangladesh relations since 2024. For 15 years, the dominant frame circumscribing Dhaka–Delhi bonhomie was personalistic—the Awami League-led regime of Sheikh Hasina. The regime cracked down on separatist elements operating in India’s Northeast from Bangladesh’s soil and evolved enduring institutional arrangements, such as the Ganga Waters Treaty and the land boundary agreement. Connectivity was a major plank of the bilateral relationship: railway lines were restored, and, in 2023, the Friendship Pipeline was inaugurated. With the fall of Hasina, the relations entered a frigid phase. Anti-India sentiment gained traction in Bangladesh, particularly after the assassination of Osman Hadi. Bangladesh imposed restrictions on the import of rice and yarn from India, while the two neighbours exchanged acrimonious terms on the question of Hasina’s extradition.&nbsp;The relations now seem to have entered a phase of cautious but strategic recalibration. India and Bangladesh are future-proofing their bilateral ties by embedding them in structural necessity and pragmatism. The logic of geography—India and Bangladesh share one of the longest land borders in the world—and economic rationalism are expected to lend credence to functional cooperation between the two states, which will sustain stability amid geopolitical and domestic headwinds.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-let-s-keep-working-says-bangladesh-envoy-hamidullah-after-fm-rahman-s-intense-delhi-week-1775993352889">‘Let’s keep working,’ says Bangladesh envoy Hamidullah after FM Rahman’s intense Delhi week</a>&nbsp;Functional cooperation serves four ends. First, by focussing on concrete, specialised shared problems, it denotes responsibility in both actors. It helps devise mechanisms for cooperation that employ best practices and lessons from both countries. Second, as these mechanisms gradually institutionalise, they lower transaction costs and make trade-offs in bilateral negotiations more agreeable and structured, rather than making a relationship a zero-sum game. Third, they create issue-linkages, cultivating interdependencies and constraining the unilateral exercise of power by imposing costs. Lastly, functional dimensions spawn expert, issue-specific networks in civil societies that diffuse norms that inform state behaviour. In the case of Bangladesh and India, river-water sharing, power, and trade can provide these critical linkages.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Ganga Waters Treaty (GWT) recognises transboundary riparian interdependence; its expiry in 2026 provides low-hanging fruit for renewing cooperative mechanisms. The revival of negotiations of the Joint Rivers Commission and the Technical Committee is a welcome development and should be made time-bound and cross-sectional. The treaty will inevitably need to revise its base years for measuring the river’s flow; the process must be backed by a mutually agreed-upon scientific methodology. The Ganges basin has experienced the cascading impact of climate change, which has hampered flows in dry seasons. A forward-looking renewal of the treaty must therefore be climate-responsive and data-driven to address this shared vulnerability.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/sheikh-hasina-s-unfiltered-interview-minorities-live-in-fear-mob-terror-rules-bangladesh-wion-1769484942121/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/sheikh-hasina-s-unfiltered-interview-minorities-live-in-fear-mob-terror-rules-bangladesh-wion-1769484942121/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;But these negotiations have a gestation period. By contrast, the opening of closed land ports and border haats between India and Bangladesh will deliver immediate relief to clogged supply chains and small traders, especially of yarn, garments, and plastic products, reducing the burden on the Benapole–Petrapole crossing. Harmonising regulations can decrease costs and time in the passage of bilateral trade.&nbsp;In addition, the template of power cooperation, largely founded on hydrocarbons, can be replicated to support the neighbours’ green transition goals. The conclusion of a tripartite power-purchase agreement among Nepal, India, and Bangladesh can be expanded in scope to include Bhutan. India and Bangladesh can also explore bilateral interdependencies in hydropower cooperation, with notable hydropower projects coming up in India’s Northeast, cutting costs and time.&nbsp;The crisis in West Asia has forced a reckoning with structural realities and avenues of cooperation. Functional cooperation on issues of river-water sharing, power, and bilateral trade can spill over into trust-building. By prioritising issue-based interdependencies, Dhaka and New Delhi can shield development and connectivity from domestic contestations, imparting resilience and predictability to their relations and the region at large.&nbsp;DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of WION.

West Asia war and the Strait of Hormuz disruption hit South Asia’s fuel supply chains. Amid crisis, India and Bangladesh are rebuilding ties through energy, trade, and water cooperation, boosting regional stability.

The war in West Asia and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz propelled a stinging disruption in supply chains, impairing industrial competitiveness, inflating household expenditures, and destabilising domestic order. Countries in the subcontinent are net importers of hydrocarbons from West Asia, with the Strait of Hormuz serving as a critical conduit. Since the beginning of the war, Sri Lanka has re-launched the National Fuel Authorisation System to ration fuel supplies. In Pakistan, supply chain disruptions have hamstrung fertiliser reserves in the kharif season, impacting agricultural productivity and food security. The subcontinent’s landlocked small states—Bhutan and Nepal—depend on India for hydrocarbon imports and, thereby, are experiencing second-order vulnerability. While the crisis has amplified the subcontinent’s economic and political predicaments, it opened a window for a reset in the bilateral relations of India and Bangladesh. In March, Bangladesh imposed rationing amid stockpiling and panic-buying. Three of its largest sources of hydrocarbon and aluminium imports—Qatar, Iraq, and the UAE—declared force majeure on production, after Iran targeted their energy infrastructure. Last month, amid public anxiety, Bangladesh received 5000 tonnes of diesel via the Indo-Bangladesh Friendship Pipeline. An additional 5000 tonnes arrived on April 10, while the government is expected to import another 17000 tonnes to assuage concerns. Also Read: Will Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League find space in Tarique Rahman’s ‘new Bangladesh’ amid Jamaat’s rise? Apart from Bangladesh, India has supplied 38000 metric tonnes of oil products to Sri Lanka and has continued uninterrupted deliveries to Bhutan and Nepal. Similar requests from Malé are also being considered. But the uniqueness of the Bangladeshi case is lent primarily by the trajectory of Indo-Bangladesh relations since 2024. For 15 years, the dominant frame circumscribing Dhaka–Delhi bonhomie was personalistic—the Awami League-led regime of Sheikh Hasina. The regime cracked down on separatist elements operating in India’s Northeast from Bangladesh’s soil and evolved enduring institutional arrangements, such as the Ganga Waters Treaty and the land boundary agreement. Connectivity was a major plank of the bilateral relationship: railway lines were restored, and, in 2023, the Friendship Pipeline was inaugurated. With the fall of Hasina, the relations entered a frigid phase. Anti-India sentiment gained traction in Bangladesh, particularly after the assassination of Osman Hadi. Bangladesh imposed restrictions on the import of rice and yarn from India, while the two neighbours exchanged acrimonious terms on the question of Hasina’s extradition. The relations now seem to have entered a phase of cautious but strategic recalibration. India and Bangladesh are future-proofing their bilateral ties by embedding them in structural necessity and pragmatism. The logic of geography—India and Bangladesh share one of the longest land borders in the world—and economic rationalism are expected to lend credence to functional cooperation between the two states, which will sustain stability amid geopolitical and domestic headwinds. Also Read: ‘Let’s keep working,’ says Bangladesh envoy Hamidullah after FM Rahman’s intense Delhi week Functional cooperation serves four ends. First, by focussing on concrete, specialised shared problems, it denotes responsibility in both actors. It helps devise mechanisms for cooperation that employ best practices and lessons from both countries. Second, as these mechanisms gradually institutionalise, they lower transaction costs and make trade-offs in bilateral negotiations more agreeable and structured, rather than making a relationship a zero-sum game. Third, they create issue-linkages, cultivating interdependencies and constraining the unilateral exercise of power by imposing costs. Lastly, functional dimensions spawn expert, issue-specific networks in civil societies that diffuse norms that inform state behaviour. In the case of Bangladesh and India, river-water sharing, power, and trade can provide these critical linkages. The Ganga Waters Treaty (GWT) recognises transboundary riparian interdependence; its expiry in 2026 provides low-hanging fruit for renewing cooperative mechanisms. The revival of negotiations of the Joint Rivers Commission and the Technical Committee is a welcome development and should be made time-bound and cross-sectional. The treaty will inevitably need to revise its base years for measuring the river’s flow; the process must be backed by a mutually agreed-upon scientific methodology. The Ganges basin has experienced the cascading impact of climate change, which has hampered flows in dry seasons. A forward-looking renewal of the treaty must therefore be climate-responsive and data-driven to address this shared vulnerability. https://www.wionews.com/videos/sheikh-hasina-s-unfiltered-interview-minorities-live-in-fear-mob-terror-rules-bangladesh-wion-1769484942121/embed But these negotiations have a gestation period. By contrast, the opening of closed land ports and border haats between India and Bangladesh will deliver immediate relief to clogged supply chains and small traders, especially of yarn, garments, and plastic products, reducing the burden on the Benapole–Petrapole crossing. Harmonising regulations can decrease costs and time in the passage of bilateral trade. In addition, the template of power cooperation, largely founded on hydrocarbons, can be replicated to support the neighbours’ green transition goals. The conclusion of a tripartite power-purchase agreement among Nepal, India, and Bangladesh can be expanded in scope to include Bhutan. India and Bangladesh can also explore bilateral interdependencies in hydropower cooperation, with notable hydropower projects coming up in India’s Northeast, cutting costs and time. The crisis in West Asia has forced a reckoning with structural realities and avenues of cooperation. Functional cooperation on issues of river-water sharing, power, and bilateral trade can spill over into trust-building. By prioritising issue-based interdependencies, Dhaka and New Delhi can shield development and connectivity from domestic contestations, imparting resilience and predictability to their relations and the region at large. DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of WION.

West Asia war and the Strait of Hormuz disruption hit South Asia’s fuel supply chains. Amid crisis, India and Bangladesh are rebuilding ties through energy, trade, and water cooperation, boosting regional stability.

Crisis as catalyst: Recalibrating India–Bangladesh ties

As Iran has failed to reach a ceasefire agreement, a cryptic social media post by US President Donald Trump has triggered fresh speculation. For years, the phrase “Winter is coming” from the popular television series Game of Thrones has symbolised an impending threat across a fictional world created by George R.R. Martin. Drawing comparisons to that sense of foreboding, Trump shared an AI-generated image of himself on the social media platform Truth Social, accompanied by the message: “THE STORM IS COMING. NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.”

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/indians-now-australia-s-top-migrant-group-surpasses-uk-s-population-more-details-inside-1777533766737">Indians now Australia’s top migrant group, surpasses UK's population: More details inside</a>&nbsp;While there is no confirmation that the post was directly inspired by the series, Trump’s statements on social media are often closely scrutinised for potential political signals. The timing of this message has fuelled speculation about its possible connection to rising tensions involving Iran, particularly as reports suggest no ceasefire deal has been finalised.&nbsp;But, no official link has been established between the post and any specific policy move or military action, and interpretations remain speculative. According to a report by Axios, the US Central Command has prepared plans for a “short and powerful” wave of strikes targeting Iran, potentially including key infrastructure. The report added that Trump is expected to receive a briefing from CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper on Thursday (April 30) regarding possible military options.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-shares-map-showing-hormuz-as-strait-of-trump-hours-after-saying-iran-will-have-to-cry-uncle-to-end-blockade-1777516925867">Trump shares map showing Hormuz as 'Strait of Trump' after 'cry uncle' jibe</a>&nbsp;The development comes amid continued US pressure on Tehran, with Trump reportedly refusing to lift a naval blockade until Iran agrees to terms addressing Washington’s concerns over its nuclear programme. Earlier, the American president had rejected Iran’s proposal that included ending hostilities, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and postponing nuclear deal discussions. Separately, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has instructed national security officials to prepare for a prolonged blockade of Iranian ports in a bid to force concessions on its nuclear ambitions.

Donald Trump’s “The Storm is Coming” post on Truth Social has sparked military speculation as Iran ceasefire talks fail and CENTCOM prepares potential strike plans amid a naval blockade.

As Iran has failed to reach a ceasefire agreement, a cryptic social media post by US President Donald Trump has triggered fresh speculation. For years, the phrase “Winter is coming” from the popular television series Game of Thrones has symbolised an impending threat across a fictional world created by George R.R. Martin. Drawing comparisons to that sense of foreboding, Trump shared an AI-generated image of himself on the social media platform Truth Social, accompanied by the message: “THE STORM IS COMING. NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.”

Donald Trump’s “The Storm is Coming” post on Truth Social has sparked military speculation as Iran ceasefire talks fail and CENTCOM prepares potential strike plans amid a naval blockade.

‘The storm is coming’? Is Trump’s cryptic post for Iran? US prez says 'nothing can stop what is coming'

US President Donald Trump has shared a modified map that renamed the Strait of Hormuz as the "Strait of Trump." This comes after the US president said that negotiations to end the Iran war are now being done remotely, describing ongoing discussions as ‘telephonic’ due to the logistical challenges of long-distance travel. Iran has send a new proposal to the US via Pakistan to end the war. However, it was reported earlier that Trump is unhappy with the proposal and is not likely to accept it. Trump sharing a post naming the Hormuz as “Strait of Trump” is interesting as the US blockade of the key shipping route continues with America claiming that Iran desperately wants it open and Iranian oil infrastructure is collapsing due to the blockade. The president’s comments also resulted in a dramatic surge in energy markets, with Brent oil futures climbing 7.6 per cent to $119.69 per barrel—the highest valuation since the onset of the Ukraine conflict in 2022.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-sends-new-proposal-to-end-war-with-us-trump-to-review-in-situation-room-meeting-what-are-the-conditions-1777262321532">Iran sends new proposal to end war with US; Trump to review it: What are the conditions?</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260430/image-1777518958120.png"></figure>&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/timeline-of-trump-s-shifting-statements-about-how-long-the-iran-war-will-last-four-to-five-weeks-is-now-no-time-frame-1776928107175">Trump finally admits there's no endgame to Iran war: 'Four to five weeks' is now 'no time frame'</a>&nbsp;While the US is focussed on economic pressure on the Islamic Republic, Trump has just on Apr 17 called the strategic oil route "Strait of Iran" in a post thanking the Iranian government for allowing full passage through the route after the ceasefire. Meanwhile, reports suggest the administration has also considered formally renaming the route the "Strait of America" if the US secures long-term control. The Strait of Hormuz is blocked by both Americans and Iranians despite ongoing ceasefire. Trump on Wednesday said that in order to end a blockade he imposed in the Strait of Hormuz, Iran would have to “cry uncle” and “give up.” “The blockade is genius. The blockade is 100 percent foolproof, which shows how good our Navy is,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office when asked how long it would continue. “Now, they have to cry uncle, that’s all they have to do. Just say, ‘We give up,’” he said, adding that their economy is “dead.”<h2>What we know about the status of Iran-US talks?</h2>The talks between Iran and the US to end the war has been stalled all over again. Hopes has revived for peace efforts as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited Islamabad, Pakistan, at least three times in 48 hours. Araghchi forwarded a new proposal to the Trump administration via Pakistan. However, reports indicated that Trump was unhappy with the proposal and is unlikely to accept it. The proposal was reportedly a three stage process. The first stage demanded a total end to the war, specifically hostilities on Hezbollah in Lebanon. The second stage called for lifting the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and restoring maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. The third stage was negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-to-introduce-new-navigation-law-amid-strait-of-hormuz-blockade-what-is-it-1777349468721">Iran to introduce new navigation law amid Strait of Hormuz blockade: What is it?</a> &nbsp;&nbsp;Both sides held first round of peace talks earlier in April after almost 50 days of war. They agreed for a ceasefire but Israel's action on Hezbollah in Lebanon became a contentious issue prompting both sides to block the Strait of Hormuz despite ceasefire. Iran pulled back from the second round of negotiations despite Trump's envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Vice President JD Vance reportedly planning their trip to Pakistan. As Iran said no to talks, Trump scrapped the visit of US representatives, stating that Iran could telephone if it wants to negotiate. Tehran responded saying talks are only possible if obstacles, including its blockade of Iranian ports are removed. &nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump stirred controversy by sharing a map renaming the Strait of Hormuz as “Strait of Trump” amid ongoing tensions with Iran. Peace talks remain stalled despite a new proposal via Pakistan, while the US blockade continues, pushing oil prices sharply higher.

US President Donald Trump has shared a modified map that renamed the Strait of Hormuz as the "Strait of Trump." This comes after the US president said that negotiations to end the Iran war are now being done remotely, describing ongoing discussions as ‘telephonic’ due to the logistical challenges of long-distance travel. Iran has send a new proposal to the US via Pakistan to end the war. However, it was reported earlier that Trump is unhappy with the proposal and is not likely to accept it. Trump sharing a post naming the Hormuz as “Strait of Trump” is interesting as the US blockade of the key shipping route continues with America claiming that Iran desperately wants it open and Iranian oil infrastructure is collapsing due to the blockade. The president’s comments also resulted in a dramatic surge in energy markets, with Brent oil futures climbing 7.6 per cent to $119.69 per barrel—the highest valuation since the onset of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. Also Read: Iran sends new proposal to end war with US; Trump to review it: What are the conditions? Also Read: Trump finally admits there's no endgame to Iran war: 'Four to five weeks' is now 'no time frame' While the US is focussed on economic pressure on the Islamic Republic, Trump has just on Apr 17 called the strategic oil route "Strait of Iran" in a post thanking the Iranian government for allowing full passage through the route after the ceasefire. Meanwhile, reports suggest the administration has also considered formally renaming the route the "Strait of America" if the US secures long-term control. The Strait of Hormuz is blocked by both Americans and Iranians despite ongoing ceasefire. Trump on Wednesday said that in order to end a blockade he imposed in the Strait of Hormuz, Iran would have to “cry uncle” and “give up.” “The blockade is genius. The blockade is 100 percent foolproof, which shows how good our Navy is,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office when asked how long it would continue. “Now, they have to cry uncle, that’s all they have to do. Just say, ‘We give up,’” he said, adding that their economy is “dead.” What we know about the status of Iran-US talks? The talks between Iran and the US to end the war has been stalled all over again. Hopes has revived for peace efforts as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited Islamabad, Pakistan, at least three times in 48 hours. Araghchi forwarded a new proposal to the Trump administration via Pakistan. However, reports indicated that Trump was unhappy with the proposal and is unlikely to accept it. The proposal was reportedly a three stage process. The first stage demanded a total end to the war, specifically hostilities on Hezbollah in Lebanon. The second stage called for lifting the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and restoring maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. The third stage was negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program. Also Read: Iran to introduce new navigation law amid Strait of Hormuz blockade: What is it? Both sides held first round of peace talks earlier in April after almost 50 days of war. They agreed for a ceasefire but Israel's action on Hezbollah in Lebanon became a contentious issue prompting both sides to block the Strait of Hormuz despite ceasefire. Iran pulled back from the second round of negotiations despite Trump's envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Vice President JD Vance reportedly planning their trip to Pakistan. As Iran said no to talks, Trump scrapped the visit of US representatives, stating that Iran could telephone if it wants to negotiate. Tehran responded saying talks are only possible if obstacles, including its blockade of Iranian ports are removed.

Trump stirred controversy by sharing a map renaming the Strait of Hormuz as “Strait of Trump” amid ongoing tensions with Iran. Peace talks remain stalled despite a new proposal via Pakistan, while the US blockade continues, pushing oil prices sharply higher.

Trump shares map showing Hormuz as 'Strait of Trump' hours after saying Iran will have to 'cry uncle' to end blockade

Since eight years ago, when Donald Trump withdrew from a landmark nuclear agreement with Tehran, Iran has built up a stockpile of 22,000 pounds, roughly 11 tons of enriched uranium. Today, however, the whereabouts of that stockpile remain uncertain, even two months after the United States launched military strikes aimed at preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Uranium is a dual-use material. At low enrichment levels, it fuels nuclear reactors and powers cities. At higher concentrations, achieved through a process known as enrichment, it becomes suitable for nuclear weapons. What makes enrichment particularly concerning is how the process accelerates. Moving from natural uranium to 20 per cent enrichment is far more difficult than progressing from 20 per cent to 60 per cent, or even to 90 percent, the level typically used in nuclear weapons.&nbsp;Iran started enriching uranium on an industrial scale in 2006, maintaining that its program was peaceful. Over time, reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency documented a steadily growing stockpile. In 2010, Tehran announced it would enrich uranium to 20 per cent, officially to fuel a research reactor. This level marked a critical threshold, the official dividing line between civilian and military uses. The concern stemmed from the fact that 20 per cent enrichment represents about 80 per cent of the way to bomb-grade fuel.&nbsp;As the stockpile expanded, the administration of Barack Obama entered negotiations to curb Iran’s program. Those talks culminated in the 2015 nuclear deal, which capped uranium enrichment at 3.67 per cent and strictly limited stockpile size for 15 years. Under the agreement, Iran shipped out 25,000 pounds, about 12.5 tons, of enriched uranium and reduced its holdings to under 660 pounds. By 2018, Iran did not possess enough material for even a single nuclear bomb when Trump exited the agreement and reinstated sweeping economic sanctions. In response, Iran gradually escalated its enrichment activities. Initially, it exceeded limits slightly to pressure Western powers. By early 2021, just before Trump left office, enrichment reached 20 per cent again.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/new-photos-show-white-house-correspondents-dinner-shooting-suspect-taking-selfie-with-weapons-before-attack-1777504949203">New photos show White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting suspect taking selfie with weapons before attack</a>&nbsp;Efforts by the administration of Joe Biden to revive the deal ultimately failed. During this period, Iran pushed enrichment to unprecedented levels of up to 60 per cent, dangerously close to weapons-grade. With Trump returning to office in 2025, Iran’s uranium stockpile grew at its fastest pace since monitoring started. That same year, during a 12-day conflict, US forces struck key Iranian nuclear facilities, including enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, as well as uranium storage tunnels near Isfahan. One month later, Iran halted cooperation with the IAEA., effectively ending international oversight of its nuclear program.&nbsp;Without on-site inspections and despite continued satellite surveillance, the location of Iran’s 11-ton uranium stockpile remains unknown. The material itself presents a challenge. Radioactive and chemically hazardous, parts of it may now be hidden or buried beneath rubble from the strikes, making access and verification extremely difficult. Even if Iran were to recover the uranium, experts caution that converting it into a functional nuclear warhead would take months, if not over a year. They also stress that Iran did not pose an immediate nuclear threat at the time the war started.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-warns-of-election-threat-amid-rising-tensions-in-occupied-ukrainian-regions-1777491897975/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-warns-of-election-threat-amid-rising-tensions-in-occupied-ukrainian-regions-1777491897975/embed</a>&nbsp;The Trump administration maintains that US satellites are tracking the buried stockpile and argues that the material is of limited use due to damage inflicted on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and expertise. However, analysts dispute this assessment. Some believe Iran may have established a covert enrichment facility within mountain tunnels near Isfahan, an area also believed to house much of the uranium. If true, this raises the possibility that Iran retains the capability to resume enrichment operations secretly, potentially advancing toward weapons-grade material beyond international scrutiny.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile has gone missing after US airstrikes in 2025. Here’s what we know about its location, risks, and nuclear implications

Since eight years ago, when Donald Trump withdrew from a landmark nuclear agreement with Tehran, Iran has built up a stockpile of 22,000 pounds, roughly 11 tons of enriched uranium. Today, however, the whereabouts of that stockpile remain uncertain, even two months after the United States launched military strikes aimed at preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Uranium is a dual-use material. At low enrichment levels, it fuels nuclear reactors and powers cities. At higher concentrations, achieved through a process known as enrichment, it becomes suitable for nuclear weapons. What makes enrichment particularly concerning is how the process accelerates. Moving from natural uranium to 20 per cent enrichment is far more difficult than progressing from 20 per cent to 60 per cent, or even to 90 percent, the level typically used in nuclear weapons. Iran started enriching uranium on an industrial scale in 2006, maintaining that its program was peaceful. Over time, reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency documented a steadily growing stockpile. In 2010, Tehran announced it would enrich uranium to 20 per cent, officially to fuel a research reactor. This level marked a critical threshold, the official dividing line between civilian and military uses. The concern stemmed from the fact that 20 per cent enrichment represents about 80 per cent of the way to bomb-grade fuel. As the stockpile expanded, the administration of Barack Obama entered negotiations to curb Iran’s program. Those talks culminated in the 2015 nuclear deal, which capped uranium enrichment at 3.67 per cent and strictly limited stockpile size for 15 years. Under the agreement, Iran shipped out 25,000 pounds, about 12.5 tons, of enriched uranium and reduced its holdings to under 660 pounds. By 2018, Iran did not possess enough material for even a single nuclear bomb when Trump exited the agreement and reinstated sweeping economic sanctions. In response, Iran gradually escalated its enrichment activities. Initially, it exceeded limits slightly to pressure Western powers. By early 2021, just before Trump left office, enrichment reached 20 per cent again. Also Read: New photos show White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting suspect taking selfie with weapons before attack Efforts by the administration of Joe Biden to revive the deal ultimately failed. During this period, Iran pushed enrichment to unprecedented levels of up to 60 per cent, dangerously close to weapons-grade. With Trump returning to office in 2025, Iran’s uranium stockpile grew at its fastest pace since monitoring started. That same year, during a 12-day conflict, US forces struck key Iranian nuclear facilities, including enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, as well as uranium storage tunnels near Isfahan. One month later, Iran halted cooperation with the IAEA., effectively ending international oversight of its nuclear program. Without on-site inspections and despite continued satellite surveillance, the location of Iran’s 11-ton uranium stockpile remains unknown. The material itself presents a challenge. Radioactive and chemically hazardous, parts of it may now be hidden or buried beneath rubble from the strikes, making access and verification extremely difficult. Even if Iran were to recover the uranium, experts caution that converting it into a functional nuclear warhead would take months, if not over a year. They also stress that Iran did not pose an immediate nuclear threat at the time the war started. https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-warns-of-election-threat-amid-rising-tensions-in-occupied-ukrainian-regions-1777491897975/embed The Trump administration maintains that US satellites are tracking the buried stockpile and argues that the material is of limited use due to damage inflicted on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and expertise. However, analysts dispute this assessment. Some believe Iran may have established a covert enrichment facility within mountain tunnels near Isfahan, an area also believed to house much of the uranium. If true, this raises the possibility that Iran retains the capability to resume enrichment operations secretly, potentially advancing toward weapons-grade material beyond international scrutiny. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Iran’s 11-ton uranium stockpile remains unaccounted for after US strikes, raising fresh concerns over hidden enrichment and future nuclear risks

Iran’s 11-ton enriched uranium mystery deepens post US strikes. Where is it now?

The Speaker of the Iranian Parliament has directly pushed back against recent comments made by Donald Trump, rejecting claims that Iran’s oil infrastructure was at risk of imminent explosions. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed the remarks as inaccurate and politically motivated, insisting that conditions on the ground contradict the warnings. “Three days have passed, and no oil well has exploded. We can extend this period to 30 days and even broadcast live footage of the wells.”He further criticised the economic reasoning behind US policy guidance, arguing that sanctions-based strategies have backfired.&nbsp;“These kinds of recommendations come from individuals who promote ideas like economic blockades—approaches that have only driven oil prices higher, even toward $140.” Ghalibaf added a broader critique of decision-making in Washington: “The issue is not just flawed ideas, but a flawed mindset.” The exchange comes amid a broader dispute over the US handling of Iranian oil exports. Washington recently moved to temporarily lift sanctions on an estimated 140 million barrels of Iranian crude already stored on tankers at sea.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/starmer-vows-action-after-london-terrorist-incident-stabbing-of-two-jewish-men-suspect-arrested-1777496331791">Starmer vows action after London 'terrorist incident' stabbing of two Jewish men; suspect identified as British national</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">3 days in, no well exploded.We could extend to 30 and livestream the well here. That was the kind of junk advice the US admin gets from people like Bessent who also push the blockade theory and cranked oil up to $120+. Next stop:140. The issue isn&#39;t the theory, it&#39;s the mindset.&mdash; محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) <a href="https://twitter.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2049592312997535754?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 29, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US officials framed the move as a strategic tool. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the administration intended to use the Iranian barrels against the Iranians to keep the price down, while limiting authorization strictly to existing shipments and not allowing new production or purchases. Three days earlier, Trump claimed in a Fox News interview that Iran’s oil infrastructure was nearing failure due to storage pressures and blockade-related constraints. That timeframe has now passed without any reported incidents. Iranian oil officials, however, had already stated that both land and sea storage capacity remained sufficient, allowing continued management of exports and production despite sanctions pressure.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-plans-strikes-to-break-deadlock-in-talks-with-iran-1777489191933/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-plans-strikes-to-break-deadlock-in-talks-with-iran-1777489191933/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Iran’s Parliament Speaker rejects Donald Trump’s claims about imminent oil infrastructure explosions, escalating a dispute over sanctions, oil markets, and global energy policy.

The Speaker of the Iranian Parliament has directly pushed back against recent comments made by Donald Trump, rejecting claims that Iran’s oil infrastructure was at risk of imminent explosions. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed the remarks as inaccurate and politically motivated, insisting that conditions on the ground contradict the warnings. “Three days have passed, and no oil well has exploded. We can extend this period to 30 days and even broadcast live footage of the wells.” He further criticised the economic reasoning behind US policy guidance, arguing that sanctions-based strategies have backfired. “These kinds of recommendations come from individuals who promote ideas like economic blockades—approaches that have only driven oil prices higher, even toward $140.” Ghalibaf added a broader critique of decision-making in Washington: “The issue is not just flawed ideas, but a flawed mindset.” The exchange comes amid a broader dispute over the US handling of Iranian oil exports. Washington recently moved to temporarily lift sanctions on an estimated 140 million barrels of Iranian crude already stored on tankers at sea. Also Read: Starmer vows action after London 'terrorist incident' stabbing of two Jewish men; suspect identified as British national

Iranian parliament speaker Ghalibaf criticises US pressure tactics on Iran, warns that sanctions and blockades could push global oil prices toward $140

'Next stop $140': Ghalibaf fires back at Trump’s oil 'explosion' claims, says 'no oil well has exploded'

Donald Trump said on Wednesday (April 29) that negotiations to end the Iran conflict are now being done remotely, describing ongoing discussions as ‘telephonic’ due to the logistical challenges of long-distance travel. Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump pointed to the difficulty of sending delegations for in-person talks, particularly to Islamabad, as a reason for shifting to phone-based diplomacy. “We have talks, we’re having talks with them now, and we’re not flying anymore with 18-hour flights every time we want to see a piece of paper,” the president said.&nbsp;“We’re doing it telephonically, and it’s very nice. I make a call, or I have my people make a call, and you know the answer in 15. I always like face-to-face, you know, I consider it better,” he continued. “But when you have to fly 18 hours every time you want to have a meeting, and you know what the meeting is all about, and you know they’re going to give you a piece of paper that you don’t like before you even leave, it’s ridiculous, and they’ve come a long way.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/watch-rep-ro-khanna-grills-pete-hegseth-over-iran-war-costs-gas-prices-and-more-1777488943352">WATCH | Rep. Ro Khanna grills Pete Hegseth over Iran war costs, gas prices and more</a>&nbsp;Sources suggest that Pakistan may receive a revised peace proposal from Iran by Friday, suggesting potential movement despite the current stalemate. Amid the slow progress, Trump has taken a harder stance, warning that Iran “better get smart soon.” He also shared a controversial edited image on his Truth Social platform showing himself holding a firearm. “The question is whether or not they’re going to go far enough, so at this moment, there will never be a deal unless they agree that there will be no nuclear weapons,” Trump added.<h2>Trump hosts NASA Artemis II astronauts at White House</h2>US President Donald Trump welcomed the Artemis II astronaut crew to the Oval Office at the White House in a high-profile event highlighting NASA’s upcoming lunar mission. The meeting emphasised the administration’s commitment to advancing human space exploration. The crew, NASA Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, Mission Specialist Christina Koch, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen, was joined by NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman during the media interaction. They are scheduled to take part in NASA’s first crewed mission around the Moon in decades. US President Donald Trump said he believes NASA has a good shot at returning astronauts to the Moon’s surface before he leaves the White House. When asked whether he thought the US space agency would achieve the goal before his second term ends in early 2029, Trump said, “We don't like to say definitely,” but “I think we have a good shot.” “We have some people that have captivated the attention of the whole world... it takes people like this to make our country great.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-plans-strikes-to-break-deadlock-in-talks-with-iran-1777489191933/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-plans-strikes-to-break-deadlock-in-talks-with-iran-1777489191933/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Donald Trump says Iran peace talks are now “telephonic” as negotiations stall, warning no deal unless Tehran agrees to no nuclear weapons

Donald Trump said on Wednesday (April 29) that negotiations to end the Iran conflict are now being done remotely, describing ongoing discussions as ‘telephonic’ due to the logistical challenges of long-distance travel. Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump pointed to the difficulty of sending delegations for in-person talks, particularly to Islamabad, as a reason for shifting to phone-based diplomacy. “We have talks, we’re having talks with them now, and we’re not flying anymore with 18-hour flights every time we want to see a piece of paper,” the president said. “We’re doing it telephonically, and it’s very nice. I make a call, or I have my people make a call, and you know the answer in 15. I always like face-to-face, you know, I consider it better,” he continued. “But when you have to fly 18 hours every time you want to have a meeting, and you know what the meeting is all about, and you know they’re going to give you a piece of paper that you don’t like before you even leave, it’s ridiculous, and they’ve come a long way.” Also Read: WATCH | Rep. Ro Khanna grills Pete Hegseth over Iran war costs, gas prices and more Sources suggest that Pakistan may receive a revised peace proposal from Iran by Friday, suggesting potential movement despite the current stalemate. Amid the slow progress, Trump has taken a harder stance, warning that Iran “better get smart soon.” He also shared a controversial edited image on his Truth Social platform showing himself holding a firearm. “The question is whether or not they’re going to go far enough, so at this moment, there will never be a deal unless they agree that there will be no nuclear weapons,” Trump added. Trump hosts NASA Artemis II astronauts at White House US President Donald Trump welcomed the Artemis II astronaut crew to the Oval Office at the White House in a high-profile event highlighting NASA’s upcoming lunar mission. The meeting emphasised the administration’s commitment to advancing human space exploration. The crew, NASA Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, Mission Specialist Christina Koch, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen, was joined by NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman during the media interaction. They are scheduled to take part in NASA’s first crewed mission around the Moon in decades. US President Donald Trump said he believes NASA has a good shot at returning astronauts to the Moon’s surface before he leaves the White House. When asked whether he thought the US space agency would achieve the goal before his second term ends in early 2029, Trump said, “We don't like to say definitely,” but “I think we have a good shot.” “We have some people that have captivated the attention of the whole world... it takes people like this to make our country great.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-plans-strikes-to-break-deadlock-in-talks-with-iran-1777489191933/embed Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US President Donald Trump says Iran talks are now ‘telephonic’ amid travel hurdles, as peace efforts stall, and he demands a no-nuclear weapons deal

Trump says Iran talks now 'telephonic' amid stalled peace talks; warns no deal if Tehran's nuclear weapons pursuit continues

US Marines boarded a commercial vessel in the Arabian Sea on Tuesday (Apr 28) after suspecting it was attempting to reach an Iranian port in violation of Washington's blockade. The vessel, M/V Blue Star III, is a container ship sailing under the flag of Comoros. On X, CENTCOM posted, "Earlier today in the Arabian Sea, U.S. Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit boarded M/V Blue Star III, a commercial ship suspected of attempting to transit to Iran in violation of the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports." Curiously, soon after marines rappelled down to the ship from helicopters, the vessel was released. Here's why.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-gps-guided-mines-pentagon-in-secret-briefing-warns-congress-reopening-strait-of-hormuz-is-a-6-month-nightmare-leaked-here-s-why-1776917945302">'GPS-guided mines?': Pentagon, in secret briefing, warns Congress reopening Strait of Hormuz is a 6-month nightmare - Here's why</a><h2>Why was the vessel released?</h2>According to reports, the vessel may have been boarded prematurely. The Comoros-flagged ship M/V Blue Star was released after a search confirmed it was not headed there. Marine traffic monitoring data revealed that the M/V Blue Star was not headed to Iran and was actually bound for the port of Sohar in Oman.<h2>But why was it boarded in the first place?</h2>US Central Command said Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit conducted the boarding after the ship raised suspicions about its intended destination. However, after completing a search and confirming the ship's voyage would not include an Iranian port call, forces released the vessel. Watch Marines forcefully board the M/V Blue Star III here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Earlier today in the Arabian Sea, U.S. Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit boarded M/V Blue Star III, a commercial ship suspected of attempting to transit to Iran in violation of the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports. U.S. forces released the vessel after conducting a… <a href="https://t.co/UFx329OsHj">pic.twitter.com/UFx329OsHj</a>&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2049171777926877463?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This comes as the US blockade of Iranian ports continues and as the Iran conflict reaches the two-month point. According to CENTCOM, 39 ships have now been redirected to ensure compliance with the blockade since it came into force.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/irgc-gunboat-fires-on-container-ship-near-oman-heavy-damage-reported-amid-strait-of-hormuz-standoff-1776845119527">IRGC gunboat fires on container ship near Oman: Heavy damage reported amid Strait of Hormuz standoff</a>The cumulative effect on shipping patterns in the region is visible in the data CENTCOM provided alongside the announcement. Before the blockade, an average of five ships were moored or anchored on any given day at Iran's Chah Bahar port. That number has now risen to more than 20, as vessels pile up with nowhere to go while US forces cut off commercial traffic in and out of Iranian ports.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Why did US Marines storm a commercial ship M/V Blue Star III in the Arabian Sea, only to let it go shortly after?

What triggered the operation, and why was the vessel released? Scroll down to find out.

US Marines boarded a commercial vessel in the Arabian Sea on Tuesday (Apr 28) after suspecting it was attempting to reach an Iranian port in violation of Washington's blockade. The vessel, M/V Blue Star III, is a container ship sailing under the flag of Comoros. On X, CENTCOM posted, "Earlier today in the Arabian Sea, U.S. Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit boarded M/V Blue Star III, a commercial ship suspected of attempting to transit to Iran in violation of the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports." Curiously, soon after marines rappelled down to the ship from helicopters, the vessel was released. Here's why. Also read | 'GPS-guided mines?': Pentagon, in secret briefing, warns Congress reopening Strait of Hormuz is a 6-month nightmare - Here's why Why was the vessel released? According to reports, the vessel may have been boarded prematurely. The Comoros-flagged ship M/V Blue Star was released after a search confirmed it was not headed there. Marine traffic monitoring data revealed that the M/V Blue Star was not headed to Iran and was actually bound for the port of Sohar in Oman. But why was it boarded in the first place? US Central Command said Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit conducted the boarding after the ship raised suspicions about its intended destination. However, after completing a search and confirming the ship's voyage would not include an Iranian port call, forces released the vessel. Watch Marines forcefully board the M/V Blue Star III here:

Why did US Marines storm a commercial ship M/V Blue Star III in the Arabian Sea, only to let it go shortly after?What triggered the operation, and why was the vessel released? Scroll down to find out.

Watch | Marines rappel, then retreat: CENTCOM shares video of bizarre ‘false alarm’ boarding of M/V Blue Star III. What happened?

US President Donald Trump sharply criticized German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Tuesday (April 28) following remarks about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, claiming that Merz appeared to accept the idea of Iran possessing nuclear weapons. Trump wrote on social media that if Iran were to obtain nuclear weapons, it would effectively place the entire world under threat. He also said that his administration is taking steps on Iran that previous leaders and countries failed to pursue. The president further aimed at Germany’s economic condition. "No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both economically and otherwise," Trump wrote on Truth Social.&nbsp;Merz, speaking a day earlier, criticised Iran’s leadership, arguing that it had embarrassed the United States diplomatically. During remarks to students in Marsberg, he said US officials had traveled to Islamabad without achieving meaningful outcomes. According to Merz, Iranian negotiators have become adept at avoiding concrete agreements, allowing American delegations to leave without progress. He added that the Iranian leadership, particularly the Revolutionary Guards, was humiliating the United States on the global stage.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/energy-shock-us-gas-prices-hit-4-year-high-as-iran-tensions-push-oil-above-100-1777400410938">Energy shock: US gas prices hit 4-year high as Iran tensions push oil above $100</a>

Merz also questioned Washington’s broader strategy in dealing with Iran, saying it was unclear what long-term plan the US was pursuing in the conflict. His comments underscored growing tensions between the United States and its European NATO allies, adding to existing disagreements over issues such as Ukraine and broader foreign policy priorities.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/idf-becomes-vulnerable-to-hezbollah-drones-1777396992636/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/idf-becomes-vulnerable-to-hezbollah-drones-1777396992636/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Donald Trump slams German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over Iran nuclear comments, exposing growing tensions between the U.S. and European allies

US President Donald Trump sharply criticized German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Tuesday (April 28) following remarks about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, claiming that Merz appeared to accept the idea of Iran possessing nuclear weapons. Trump wrote on social media that if Iran were to obtain nuclear weapons, it would effectively place the entire world under threat. He also said that his administration is taking steps on Iran that previous leaders and countries failed to pursue. The president further aimed at Germany’s economic condition. "No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both economically and otherwise," Trump wrote on Truth Social. Merz, speaking a day earlier, criticised Iran’s leadership, arguing that it had embarrassed the United States diplomatically. During remarks to students in Marsberg, he said US officials had traveled to Islamabad without achieving meaningful outcomes. According to Merz, Iranian negotiators have become adept at avoiding concrete agreements, allowing American delegations to leave without progress. He added that the Iranian leadership, particularly the Revolutionary Guards, was humiliating the United States on the global stage. Also Read: Energy shock: US gas prices hit 4-year high as Iran tensions push oil above $100

Trump criticizes Germany’s Merz on Truth Social over Iran remarks, warning of nuclear risks and highlighting rising tensions between the US and European allies

'He doesn't know what he is talking about': Trump slams Merz over Iran nuclear stance

Gasoline prices across the United States climbed to a four-year high on Tuesday (April 28) as negotiations between the US and Iran showed little progress. According to AAA, the national average price for a gallon of regular gasoline reached $4.18. This is the highest level since April 2022, shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine. Prices rose 1.6 per cent on Tuesday alone, marking the sharpest daily increase in over a month. Crude oil prices continued their upward trend as talks remained stalled over reopening the Strait of Hormuz and limiting Iran’s nuclear activities.&nbsp;Over the past week, oil prices have surged steadily. Brent crude, the global benchmark, has increased in six of the last seven sessions and is now more than 40 per cent higher than before the initial U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February. Despite rising energy costs, stock markets remain near record highs, supported by strong corporate earnings. Investors are closely watching upcoming reports from major technology firms investing heavily in artificial intelligence. Oil prices saw further gains on Tuesday. Brent crude rose 4 per cent to above $105 per barrel for July delivery before easing to $104 after the United Arab Emirates announced plans to exit OPEC next month. Over the past week, Brent has climbed roughly $10 per barrel, while June delivery prices briefly exceeded $110.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/athens-shootings-89-year-old-gunman-arrested-after-office-court-attacks-1777391579416">Athens shootings: 89-year-old gunman arrested after office, court attacks</a>&nbsp;Meanwhile, West Texas Intermediate crude increased 5 percent to about $101 per barrel for June delivery. Market participants are closely monitoring disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route between Iran and Oman that typically handles about one-fifth of global oil supply. Stock markets showed some weakness ahead of key economic events. The S&amp;P 500 dropped 0.6 percent on Tuesday after a slight gain the previous day, as investors awaited tech earnings and the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision. Asian markets were mixed. South Korea’s Kospi rose 0.4 percent, while Taiwan’s Sensex fell 0.4 percent. Japan’s Nikkei 225 declined 1 per cent after the Bank of Japan kept rates unchanged, though some policymakers signaled concern about inflation linked to the Iran conflict.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/mexico-captures-drug-kingpin-el-mencho-s-possible-successor-el-jardinero-1777396967753/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/mexico-captures-drug-kingpin-el-mencho-s-possible-successor-el-jardinero-1777396967753/embed</a>&nbsp;In Europe, the Stoxx 600 index slipped 0.5 per cent. Gasoline prices continued to edge higher, with the national average reaching $4.18 per gallon, up about 40 per cent since the conflict began. Diesel prices have risen even faster, reaching $5.46 per gallon, a 45 per cent increase. Gas prices typically lag behind changes in crude oil, rather than moving in direct sync.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

U.S. gas prices surge to a four-year high amid Iran tensions, rising oil prices, and Strait of Hormuz disruptions impacting global markets

Gasoline prices across the United States climbed to a four-year high on Tuesday (April 28) as negotiations between the US and Iran showed little progress. According to AAA, the national average price for a gallon of regular gasoline reached $4.18. This is the highest level since April 2022, shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine. Prices rose 1.6 per cent on Tuesday alone, marking the sharpest daily increase in over a month. Crude oil prices continued their upward trend as talks remained stalled over reopening the Strait of Hormuz and limiting Iran’s nuclear activities. Over the past week, oil prices have surged steadily. Brent crude, the global benchmark, has increased in six of the last seven sessions and is now more than 40 per cent higher than before the initial U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February. Despite rising energy costs, stock markets remain near record highs, supported by strong corporate earnings. Investors are closely watching upcoming reports from major technology firms investing heavily in artificial intelligence. Oil prices saw further gains on Tuesday. Brent crude rose 4 per cent to above $105 per barrel for July delivery before easing to $104 after the United Arab Emirates announced plans to exit OPEC next month. Over the past week, Brent has climbed roughly $10 per barrel, while June delivery prices briefly exceeded $110. Also Read: Athens shootings: 89-year-old gunman arrested after office, court attacks Meanwhile, West Texas Intermediate crude increased 5 percent to about $101 per barrel for June delivery. Market participants are closely monitoring disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route between Iran and Oman that typically handles about one-fifth of global oil supply. Stock markets showed some weakness ahead of key economic events. The S&P 500 dropped 0.6 percent on Tuesday after a slight gain the previous day, as investors awaited tech earnings and the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision. Asian markets were mixed. South Korea’s Kospi rose 0.4 percent, while Taiwan’s Sensex fell 0.4 percent. Japan’s Nikkei 225 declined 1 per cent after the Bank of Japan kept rates unchanged, though some policymakers signaled concern about inflation linked to the Iran conflict. https://www.wionews.com/videos/mexico-captures-drug-kingpin-el-mencho-s-possible-successor-el-jardinero-1777396967753/embed In Europe, the Stoxx 600 index slipped 0.5 per cent. Gasoline prices continued to edge higher, with the national average reaching $4.18 per gallon, up about 40 per cent since the conflict began. Diesel prices have risen even faster, reaching $5.46 per gallon, a 45 per cent increase. Gas prices typically lag behind changes in crude oil, rather than moving in direct sync. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US gas prices hit $4.18, a 4-year high, as ongoing Iran tensions disrupt oil supply and push crude prices above $100 per barrel globally

Energy shock: US gas prices hit 4-year high as Iran tensions push oil above $100

A diplomatic clash marked the 11th Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference. The dispute centred on Iran's nomination as one of 34 vice presidents of the month-long conference. The conference chair, Vietnam's UN ambassador Do Hung Viet, said that Iran was nominated "the group of non-aligned and other states" as the Vice President of the conference. The Non-Aligned Movement is the largest grouping of states outside the UN, and was formed during the US and the USSR Cold War era. They decided to stay outside the binary of the Capitalist and Communist war.<h2>How did the members react to Iran's nomination?</h2>The US representative to the NPT objected to Iran's nomination, calling it an “affront to the NPT itself.” “We are deeply shocked that this body has chosen to allow Iran to assume any position of leadership at this review conference,” said the US representative. Iran called it a double standard, arguing that Iran has consistently adhered to the NPT, whereas the US's huge nuclear arsenal and its actions “undermine disarmament efforts” and violate the treaty. Iran's representative pointed out the US-Israeli Operation Midnight Hammer, Operation Epic Fury and Operation Roaring Lion, on “peaceful nuclear facilities, facilities that are under the safeguard of the International Atomic Energy Agency,” as “a direct assault on the integrity of the global non-proliferation.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-iran-war-proposal-nuclear-delay-blockade-hormuz-1777352583017">Trump unhappy with Iran's proposal over nuclear postponement clause</a>The E3 states (the United Kingdom, France and Germany), backed by Australia and the UAE, expressed concern about the elevation of Iran to a leadership position, which sends a dangerous message. Highlighting its actions since February 28, against its neighbours were destabilising, &nbsp;"brutal" and "unlawful."&nbsp;“If a state party can disregard its obligations, undermine verification, destabilise its region, threaten international waterways, and still be elevated to a leadership position in this process, then we must ask what message this conference is sending," said the UAE representative. Russia backed Iran, and accused the E3, Australia and the UAE of “political attacks.”&nbsp;

A major diplomatic rift erupts at the nuclear NPT Review Conference as Iran’s nomination to a leadership role draws sharp opposition from the US and its allies.

A diplomatic clash marked the 11th Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference. The dispute centred on Iran's nomination as one of 34 vice presidents of the month-long conference. The conference chair, Vietnam's UN ambassador Do Hung Viet, said that Iran was nominated "the group of non-aligned and other states" as the Vice President of the conference. The Non-Aligned Movement is the largest grouping of states outside the UN, and was formed during the US and the USSR Cold War era. They decided to stay outside the binary of the Capitalist and Communist war. How did the members react to Iran's nomination? The US representative to the NPT objected to Iran's nomination, calling it an “affront to the NPT itself.” “We are deeply shocked that this body has chosen to allow Iran to assume any position of leadership at this review conference,” said the US representative. Iran called it a double standard, arguing that Iran has consistently adhered to the NPT, whereas the US's huge nuclear arsenal and its actions “undermine disarmament efforts” and violate the treaty. Iran's representative pointed out the US-Israeli Operation Midnight Hammer, Operation Epic Fury and Operation Roaring Lion, on “peaceful nuclear facilities, facilities that are under the safeguard of the International Atomic Energy Agency,” as “a direct assault on the integrity of the global non-proliferation.” Also Read: Trump unhappy with Iran's proposal over nuclear postponement clause The E3 states (the United Kingdom, France and Germany), backed by Australia and the UAE, expressed concern about the elevation of Iran to a leadership position, which sends a dangerous message. Highlighting its actions since February 28, against its neighbours were destabilising, "brutal" and "unlawful." “If a state party can disregard its obligations, undermine verification, destabilise its region, threaten international waterways, and still be elevated to a leadership position in this process, then we must ask what message this conference is sending," said the UAE representative. Russia backed Iran, and accused the E3, Australia and the UAE of “political attacks.”

A major diplomatic rift erupts at the nuclear NPT Review Conference as Iran’s nomination to a leadership role draws sharp opposition from the US and its allies.

Iran's nomination as Vice President of Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty conference sparks row

us-iran-war

Us Iran War, News on Us Iran War, stories on Us Iran War, articles on Us Iran War, Us Iran War stories at Wion, Us Iran War news, Us Iran War latest news

us iran-war

US-Iran War | Trump on Seizing Iranian Oil Cargo: Its a Very Profitable Business

US-Iran War: Trump Warns Shipping Companies Against Paying Tolls to Iran

US-Iran War: Has The US War Against Iran Really Been 'Terminated'?

US-Iran War: War Powers Act Limits The Use of Force Without Congress Approval

US clears $8.6 bn arms sales to Israel, Qatar, UAE and Kuwait amid Iran tensions

US-Iran War: Hormuz Disruption Hits Key Global Fuel Supply Routes

US-Iran War: US Seizes Iranian Ships Amid Rising Tensions

‘Renewed war’ between US and Iran likely? Iranian official’s BIG warning

Pentagon says US blockade has cost Iran $4.8 billion in oil losses

US sanctions Chinese oil terminal over Iran trade, warns on Hormuz 'tolls'

'Hostilities have terminated': Trump tells Congress ahead of War Powers deadline

Trump threatens Iran to strike a deal, says ‘not satisfied’ with new proposal

US-Iran War: Trump Briefed On 'Special Forces Mission' To Secure Uranium Stockpile

Trump signals US troop cuts in Italy, Spain amid rift over Iran operations

Pete Hegseth says Iran ceasefire 'stops the clock' for Congressional approval

Ghalibaf mocks US blockade claims, says 'Good luck blockading Iran with vast...'

Trump says, 'Iran is dying to make a deal, they cannot be nuclear'

How much US has spent on Iran war? Here's what we know

US-Iran War: Trump Extends Iran Blockade As Hormuz Crisis Deepens, Oil Prices Surge

$25B, $40B, $50B or more: Is US hiding its real spending on Iran conflict?

US-Iran truce soon? US military to present 3 new plans to Trump, says report

Crisis as catalyst: Recalibrating India–Bangladesh ties

‘The storm is coming’? Is Trump’s cryptic post for Iran?

Trump shares map showing Hormuz as 'Strait of Trump' after 'cry uncle' jibe

Iran’s 11-ton enriched uranium mystery deepens post US strikes. Where is it now?

Ghalibaf responds to Trump: 'No oil well has exploded' amid sanctions dispute