US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has dismissed calls for his impeachment, describing the move as a 'sham'. His remarks come amid mounting political pressure and criticism from lawmakers. The impeachment push has added to tensions surrounding the Trump administration as Hegseth faces scrutiny over his role as Pentagon chief.

US War Secretary Pete Hegseth slams move to impeach him

At a time when European governments are increasingly worried about Russia’s actions, an unexpected message has reportedly come from Washington. The Trump administration wants some of its closest NATO allies to be more restrained in how they speak about Moscow, even as concerns grow over the threat Russia poses to the continent.According to Reuters, citing people familiar with the discussions, Pentagon officials have privately urged Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to tone down their public statements about Russia, arguing that some remarks by European leaders could undermine regional security.<h2>US warns against provoking Moscow</h2>One official told Reuters that Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby had recently advised a Baltic official against “poking” Russia. He reportedly cited public remarks suggesting that Russia was “cornered like a rat” as an example of rhetoric Washington considered unhelpful.Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal had used the phrase “rat in a corner” to describe Russian President Vladimir Putin in late September, linking Moscow’s alleged sabotage activities in Europe to its difficulties in Ukraine.Another European official described the Pentagon’s recent message by saying: “We are helping you. The Americans are there. Just don’t be loud. Don’t make noise.”A Pentagon spokesperson declined to address the reported exchanges, saying: “Private conversations among allies are just that, so we will not comment on these allegations.”<h2>Growing unease over European security</h2>The requests come as the Trump administration renews efforts to negotiate an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine. Washington has reportedly considered incentives for Moscow, including sanctions relief, while pressing Kyiv to halt attacks on Russian energy infrastructure.The discussions have exposed differing views within NATO. Some officials believe highlighting Russia’s threat could fuel fear and weaken public support for Ukraine. Others argue that governments must be open about the risks to justify increased defence spending.Meanwhile, European capitals remain concerned about alleged Russian sabotage operations. German prosecutors said two Belarusian nationals were arrested on Wednesday over an alleged plan to set fire to a building or critical infrastructure facility in the Nuremberg area. Moscow has denied pursuing a campaign of sabotage against Western countries.The Pentagon is also reviewing its military posture in Europe, a process that could result in a sharp reduction in US troop numbers on the continent. Washington has repeatedly called on European NATO members to assume greater responsibility for their own defence.

The Pentagon has privately urged Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to tone down their rhetoric on Russia, warning that public remarks could undermine European security amid US-led Ukraine peace efforts.

At a time when European governments are increasingly worried about Russia’s actions, an unexpected message has reportedly come from Washington. The Trump administration wants some of its closest NATO allies to be more restrained in how they speak about Moscow, even as concerns grow over the threat Russia poses to the continent. According to Reuters, citing people familiar with the discussions, Pentagon officials have privately urged Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to tone down their public statements about Russia, arguing that some remarks by European leaders could undermine regional security. US warns against provoking Moscow One official told Reuters that Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby had recently advised a Baltic official against “poking” Russia. He reportedly cited public remarks suggesting that Russia was “cornered like a rat” as an example of rhetoric Washington considered unhelpful. Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal had used the phrase “rat in a corner” to describe Russian President Vladimir Putin in late September, linking Moscow’s alleged sabotage activities in Europe to its difficulties in Ukraine. Another European official described the Pentagon’s recent message by saying: “We are helping you. The Americans are there. Just don’t be loud. Don’t make noise.” A Pentagon spokesperson declined to address the reported exchanges, saying: “Private conversations among allies are just that, so we will not comment on these allegations.” Growing unease over European security The requests come as the Trump administration renews efforts to negotiate an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine. Washington has reportedly considered incentives for Moscow, including sanctions relief, while pressing Kyiv to halt attacks on Russian energy infrastructure. The discussions have exposed differing views within NATO. Some officials believe highlighting Russia’s threat could fuel fear and weaken public support for Ukraine. Others argue that governments must be open about the risks to justify increased defence spending. Meanwhile, European capitals remain concerned about alleged Russian sabotage operations. German prosecutors said two Belarusian nationals were arrested on Wednesday over an alleged plan to set fire to a building or critical infrastructure facility in the Nuremberg area. Moscow has denied pursuing a campaign of sabotage against Western countries. The Pentagon is also reviewing its military posture in Europe, a process that could result in a sharp reduction in US troop numbers on the continent. Washington has repeatedly called on European NATO members to assume greater responsibility for their own defence.

The Pentagon has privately urged Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to tone down their rhetoric on Russia, warning that public remarks could undermine European security amid US-led Ukraine peace efforts.

Is Pentagon quietly telling European allies to ease up on Russia? What we know

At a time when U.S. is hinting at fresh strikes on Iran, U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth sacked yet another top general. According to reports, at least 26 generals and admirals have resigned or been pushed out since Hegseth started his tenure less than two years ago.


American military crisis explodes, berserk Hegseth fires yet another top general 

The United States is set to get 850 fifth-generation F-35 stealth fighter jets under a 10-year agreement announced by the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin on Thursday. The deal aims to expand aircraft production and strengthen the US defence industrial base, although its financial value has not been disclosed.&nbsp;The agreement, which requires congressional approval and funding, is part of the Pentagon's effort to boost weapons production through long-term contracts.&nbsp;The deal "cements (the plane's) role as the free world's key frontline fighter for years ahead," Lockheed Martin Chairman, President and CEO Jim Taiclet said.<h3>Lockheed to invest $7 billion in F-35 programme</h3>Under the agreement, Lockheed Martin will invest $7 billion in projects supporting the F-35 programme and produce 156 aircraft annually. The deal also covers initial spare parts, 10 years of modification kits and maintenance support, as well as international customer orders.&nbsp;Pentagon acquisition official Michael Duffey said the agreement would help strengthen the US defence industry.&nbsp;"We have fundamentally changed how we stabilise the American defence industrial base to produce at speed and scale," Duffey said.&nbsp;He added, "By aligning financial incentives with actual performance, we are ensuring our warfighters are equipped with the lethal capabilities they need to fight and win."&nbsp;Lockheed said the agreement could deliver billions of dollars in savings through long-term pricing and bulk discounts.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/netanyahu-dials-pm-modi-invites-him-and-capt-smit-machchhar-to-light-torch-on-israel-s-independence-day-1792677210739">Netanyahu dials PM Modi, invites him and Capt Smit Machchhar to light torch on Israel’s Independence Day</a><h3>F-35 fighter jet: Features and global demand</h3>The F-35 is a fifth-generation combat aircraft developed by the United States and several allied countries. It comes in three variants, each of which can cost more than $100 million. According to Lockheed Martin, more than 1,375 F-35s are based around the world.&nbsp;US forces have used the aircraft in combat during the US-Israeli war against Iran.&nbsp;The United States recently announced approval of a $24.3 billion sale of 48 F-35 jets to Saudi Arabia, reflecting international interest in the aircraft.&nbsp;Turkey, which was expelled from the programme in 2019 after purchasing a Russian air defence system, has expressed confidence that it could regain access to the jets. Israel strongly opposes the move.&nbsp;Lockheed Martin said the F-35 programme would support more than 315,000 jobs and generate nearly $80 billion in economic activity over the next decade.&nbsp;"With the greater certainty that comes from the US government's transformative approach to F-35 production and sustainment, we can make the upfront investments needed to expand capacity, improve efficiency, and build a more resilient supply chain," Taiclet said.&nbsp;"That's good for the taxpayer, good for our suppliers and, most importantly, good for the United States and its allies," he added.

The Pentagon and Lockheed Martin have announced a 10-year framework agreement to produce 850 F-35 stealth fighter jets, with a $7 billion investment from the company to support the programme.

The United States is set to get 850 fifth-generation F-35 stealth fighter jets under a 10-year agreement announced by the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin on Thursday. The deal aims to expand aircraft production and strengthen the US defence industrial base, although its financial value has not been disclosed. The agreement, which requires congressional approval and funding, is part of the Pentagon's effort to boost weapons production through long-term contracts. The deal "cements (the plane's) role as the free world's key frontline fighter for years ahead," Lockheed Martin Chairman, President and CEO Jim Taiclet said. Lockheed to invest $7 billion in F-35 programme Under the agreement, Lockheed Martin will invest $7 billion in projects supporting the F-35 programme and produce 156 aircraft annually. The deal also covers initial spare parts, 10 years of modification kits and maintenance support, as well as international customer orders. Pentagon acquisition official Michael Duffey said the agreement would help strengthen the US defence industry. "We have fundamentally changed how we stabilise the American defence industrial base to produce at speed and scale," Duffey said. He added, "By aligning financial incentives with actual performance, we are ensuring our warfighters are equipped with the lethal capabilities they need to fight and win." Lockheed said the agreement could deliver billions of dollars in savings through long-term pricing and bulk discounts. Also Read: Netanyahu dials PM Modi, invites him and Capt Smit Machchhar to light torch on Israel’s Independence Day F-35 fighter jet: Features and global demand The F-35 is a fifth-generation combat aircraft developed by the United States and several allied countries. It comes in three variants, each of which can cost more than $100 million. According to Lockheed Martin, more than 1,375 F-35s are based around the world. US forces have used the aircraft in combat during the US-Israeli war against Iran. The United States recently announced approval of a $24.3 billion sale of 48 F-35 jets to Saudi Arabia, reflecting international interest in the aircraft. Turkey, which was expelled from the programme in 2019 after purchasing a Russian air defence system, has expressed confidence that it could regain access to the jets. Israel strongly opposes the move. Lockheed Martin said the F-35 programme would support more than 315,000 jobs and generate nearly $80 billion in economic activity over the next decade. "With the greater certainty that comes from the US government's transformative approach to F-35 production and sustainment, we can make the upfront investments needed to expand capacity, improve efficiency, and build a more resilient supply chain," Taiclet said. "That's good for the taxpayer, good for our suppliers and, most importantly, good for the United States and its allies," he added.

The Pentagon and Lockheed Martin have announced a 10-year framework agreement to produce 850 F-35 stealth fighter jets, with a $7 billion investment from the company to support the programme.

US to get 850 F-35 stealth fighter jets under 10-year Pentagon-Lockheed deal

The United States is looking to replenish its missile stockpiles while developing new weapons, including hypersonic missiles. Defence expert Mark Cancian says the US will need a three-tier missile arsenal, ranging from low-cost weapons to advanced systems such as Patriot interceptors and hypersonic missiles, which can travel at more than five times the speed of sound and manoeuvre during flight.

US-Iran war: Pentagon pushes hypersonic weapons production

The United States is set to livestream a firing squad execution, drawing attention to the use of capital punishment. The case has renewed debate over execution methods and transparency in the death penalty system. Firing squad executions remain rare in the US. Further details about the planned livestream and the execution are awaited.


Pentagon vows to livestream Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan's execution

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is opening an “Office of Religious Affairs” at the Pentagon, leading to fears that he will use the office to elevate a Christian nationalist agenda and ostracise other faiths. Critics say the move violates First Amendment protections and breaks down the wall separating the church and the state. Hegseth has often said that a “spiritual battle” is being waged between Christianity and America. Hegseth has used religion and faith to defend the war against Iran and often invokes scriptures and Christian prayers while talking about adversaries.<h2>What will "Office of Religious Affairs" do?</h2> According to Pentagon memos and statements from leadership, the office will serve "several core administrative and spiritual objectives." Speaking to troops and officials from Quantico, Virginia, on Wednesday, Hegseth said that the office would serve as "a direct line to the secretary" and give military chaplains "an advocate at the highest levels."&nbsp;The office will promote "spiritual readiness" and oversee religious policy. It will work to fund them and take initiatives meant to evaluate and bolster the "spiritual fitness" and combat readiness of military service members. It places the US Military Chaplain Corps under a direct line of authority to Hegseth. The aim is to shift the focus of the chaplains away from therapeutic "self-help" towards spiritual ministry, religious doctrine, and pastoral support.&nbsp;Office of Religious Affairs also coordinates faith-based mental health and suicide-reduction initiatives and offers faith-based support programs to military families. The office has been formed at a time when the Pentagon has reduced the list of officially recognised military religious affiliations to 31 traditions. Traditional faiths take precedence, while Unitarian Universalists, pagans, Wiccans, and non-religious/atheist support groups have been removed.<h2>Criticism of Office of Religious Affairs</h2>&nbsp;First Amendment advocacy groups, secular organisations, and constitutional scholars have slammed the decision as the office centralises religious oversight within the Pentagon. This blurs the boundary between church and state and favours specific religious doctrines over others.&nbsp;“For more than 250 years, the military and its chaplains have served the diverse religious and spiritual needs of all our service members,” Americans United for Separation of Church and State president Rachel Laser said in a statement. She accused Hegseth of "abusing his government position to impose his beliefs on others", adding that “it puts the needs of America’s service members second to this administration’s Christian Nationalist agenda.”<h2>First Amendment and separating religion from state</h2>The First Amendment clause prohibits the government from establishing a national religion or favouring one over the other. Thomas Jefferson, the third US President, had stressed the need to have a wall between church and the state to avoid religious dominance in governance.&nbsp;Hegseth, a member of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches denomination, promotes Christian influence within the government. Meanwhile, a memo for the office states that "nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to compel religious participation or to diminish the free exercise rights of any service member, civilian employee, or family member of any faith or no faith."

Office of Religious Affairs at the Pentagon will promote "spiritual readiness" and bolster the “spiritual fitness” of military service members. Critics claim the move will promote one religion over others and violate the First Amendment.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is opening an “Office of Religious Affairs” at the Pentagon, leading to fears that he will use the office to elevate a Christian nationalist agenda and ostracise other faiths. Critics say the move violates First Amendment protections and breaks down the wall separating the church and the state. Hegseth has often said that a “spiritual battle” is being waged between Christianity and America. Hegseth has used religion and faith to defend the war against Iran and often invokes scriptures and Christian prayers while talking about adversaries. What will "Office of Religious Affairs" do? According to Pentagon memos and statements from leadership, the office will serve "several core administrative and spiritual objectives." Speaking to troops and officials from Quantico, Virginia, on Wednesday, Hegseth said that the office would serve as "a direct line to the secretary" and give military chaplains "an advocate at the highest levels." The office will promote "spiritual readiness" and oversee religious policy. It will work to fund them and take initiatives meant to evaluate and bolster the "spiritual fitness" and combat readiness of military service members. It places the US Military Chaplain Corps under a direct line of authority to Hegseth. The aim is to shift the focus of the chaplains away from therapeutic "self-help" towards spiritual ministry, religious doctrine, and pastoral support. Office of Religious Affairs also coordinates faith-based mental health and suicide-reduction initiatives and offers faith-based support programs to military families. The office has been formed at a time when the Pentagon has reduced the list of officially recognised military religious affiliations to 31 traditions. Traditional faiths take precedence, while Unitarian Universalists, pagans, Wiccans, and non-religious/atheist support groups have been removed. Criticism of Office of Religious Affairs First Amendment advocacy groups, secular organisations, and constitutional scholars have slammed the decision as the office centralises religious oversight within the Pentagon. This blurs the boundary between church and state and favours specific religious doctrines over others. “For more than 250 years, the military and its chaplains have served the diverse religious and spiritual needs of all our service members,” Americans United for Separation of Church and State president Rachel Laser said in a statement. She accused Hegseth of "abusing his government position to impose his beliefs on others", adding that “it puts the needs of America’s service members second to this administration’s Christian Nationalist agenda.” First Amendment and separating religion from state The First Amendment clause prohibits the government from establishing a national religion or favouring one over the other. Thomas Jefferson, the third US President, had stressed the need to have a wall between church and the state to avoid religious dominance in governance. Hegseth, a member of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches denomination, promotes Christian influence within the government. Meanwhile, a memo for the office states that "nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to compel religious participation or to diminish the free exercise rights of any service member, civilian employee, or family member of any faith or no faith."

Office of Religious Affairs at the Pentagon will promote "spiritual readiness" and bolster the “spiritual fitness” of military service members. Critics claim the move will promote one religion over others and violate the First Amendment.

Spiritual warfare or constitutional breach? Pentagon’s new religious affairs office triggers outrage

The Pentagon has quietly raised the number of U.S. service members wounded in the Iran war to 861, after adding 37 personnel to its public casualty database. The update includes 29 Navy sailors and eight Marines. The Pentagon database does not publicly explain when or how the newly added personnel were injured, while a Navy spokesperson said the 29 sailors have since returned to duty.


Iran war: US officials says actual military death toll may also be higher

The Pentagon's public tally of US troops wounded during the Iran conflict increased by 37 this week, without an explanation from the Defense Department about when or how the injuries occurred. The increase includes 29 Navy sailors and eight Marines, according to a review of the Pentagon's Defense Casualty Analysis System, or DCAS, a public database tracking US military personnel killed and wounded during overseas conflicts and operations.&nbsp;As of Wednesday, DCAS listed 861 US troops as wounded during the Iran conflict. More than half of those cases are categorized in the database under ‘Overseas Operations’ following the start of a July ceasefire between Washington and Tehran that subsequently collapsed. Earlier casualties were recorded under ‘Operation Epic Fury’, the name used by the Trump administration for the Iran conflict.<h2>Pentagon database gives no details on 37 injuries</h2>The DCAS database does not specify when or how the 37 newly listed service members were wounded. A Navy official said all 29 sailors had returned to duty following the unspecified injuries. The Pentagon has previously acknowledged that entries into the DCAS database can be delayed for days or longer. Officials have cited several reasons, including delays in reporting concussions and traumatic brain injuries because symptoms may not appear immediately.&nbsp;The Navy and Marine Corps directed questions to US Central Command, which oversees American military operations in the Middle East. A Central Command spokesman declined to comment. Military officials have not publicly identified recent attacks or other incidents involving US forces that would explain the addition of the 37 wounded personnel.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-backs-trump-administration-s-use-of-save-database-to-check-voter-citizenship-1790372827887">US Supreme Court backs Trump administration's use of SAVE database to check voter citizenship</a><h2>Trump administration disputes war description</h2>The casualty update comes amid continued debate over how the Trump administration describes the conflict with Iran. President Donald Trump and other senior officials have repeatedly argued since the ceasefire that the confrontation should not be characterized as a war. Vice President JD Vance told reporters on September 3, “Right now, there is no active shooting.” The latest DCAS update nevertheless adds to the publicly recorded number of US military personnel who have been wounded in connection with operations involving Iran.<h2>Pentagon casualty reporting under scrutiny</h2>The administration's handling of military casualty figures has faced increased scrutiny since earlier this year. Four US service members who died as a result of the Iran conflict were briefly absent from the Pentagon's official casualty tally. The Washington Post subsequently reported that more American service members had died in the Middle East during the conflict than had been publicly disclosed by the Pentagon.&nbsp;According to officials cited in that report, as many as five military fatalities were not reflected in the DCAS database. The discrepancy has not been resolved publicly. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth rejected the report and called it ‘disgusting’. At the time, DCAS listed 18 US personnel as having died from hostile and nonhostile causes since February 28, when the Trump administration, working with Israel, launched the military campaign against Iran.&nbsp;Not all of the deaths were directly attributed to the Iran conflict. Some involved US personnel stationed in the region while hostilities were underway. The Pentagon's fatality tally increased to 19 this week following the death of an Army officer who experienced a medical emergency on September 18 while traveling to the Middle East.<h2>What the DCAS data includes?</h2>Historically, the Pentagon's casualty database has included both hostile and nonhostile deaths. Nonhostile fatalities can include deaths resulting from accidents, sudden medical emergencies and self-inflicted injuries, including suicides. Such reporting has traditionally been intended to provide the public with a comprehensive record of the human cost borne by US service members and their families during military operations. The latest increase in the wounded tally comes as questions continue over the completeness and timing of the Pentagon's public casualty disclosures.

Pentagon data shows 37 more US troops wounded in the Iran conflict, raising the tally to 861 as questions grow over casualty reporting and disclosures

The Pentagon's public tally of US troops wounded during the Iran conflict increased by 37 this week, without an explanation from the Defense Department about when or how the injuries occurred. The increase includes 29 Navy sailors and eight Marines, according to a review of the Pentagon's Defense Casualty Analysis System, or DCAS, a public database tracking US military personnel killed and wounded during overseas conflicts and operations. As of Wednesday, DCAS listed 861 US troops as wounded during the Iran conflict. More than half of those cases are categorized in the database under ‘Overseas Operations’ following the start of a July ceasefire between Washington and Tehran that subsequently collapsed. Earlier casualties were recorded under ‘Operation Epic Fury’, the name used by the Trump administration for the Iran conflict. Pentagon database gives no details on 37 injuries The DCAS database does not specify when or how the 37 newly listed service members were wounded. A Navy official said all 29 sailors had returned to duty following the unspecified injuries. The Pentagon has previously acknowledged that entries into the DCAS database can be delayed for days or longer. Officials have cited several reasons, including delays in reporting concussions and traumatic brain injuries because symptoms may not appear immediately. The Navy and Marine Corps directed questions to US Central Command, which oversees American military operations in the Middle East. A Central Command spokesman declined to comment. Military officials have not publicly identified recent attacks or other incidents involving US forces that would explain the addition of the 37 wounded personnel. Also Read: US Supreme Court backs Trump administration's use of SAVE database to check voter citizenship Trump administration disputes war description The casualty update comes amid continued debate over how the Trump administration describes the conflict with Iran. President Donald Trump and other senior officials have repeatedly argued since the ceasefire that the confrontation should not be characterized as a war. Vice President JD Vance told reporters on September 3, “Right now, there is no active shooting.” The latest DCAS update nevertheless adds to the publicly recorded number of US military personnel who have been wounded in connection with operations involving Iran. Pentagon casualty reporting under scrutiny The administration's handling of military casualty figures has faced increased scrutiny since earlier this year. Four US service members who died as a result of the Iran conflict were briefly absent from the Pentagon's official casualty tally. The Washington Post subsequently reported that more American service members had died in the Middle East during the conflict than had been publicly disclosed by the Pentagon. According to officials cited in that report, as many as five military fatalities were not reflected in the DCAS database. The discrepancy has not been resolved publicly. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth rejected the report and called it ‘disgusting’. At the time, DCAS listed 18 US personnel as having died from hostile and nonhostile causes since February 28, when the Trump administration, working with Israel, launched the military campaign against Iran. Not all of the deaths were directly attributed to the Iran conflict. Some involved US personnel stationed in the region while hostilities were underway. The Pentagon's fatality tally increased to 19 this week following the death of an Army officer who experienced a medical emergency on September 18 while traveling to the Middle East. What the DCAS data includes? Historically, the Pentagon's casualty database has included both hostile and nonhostile deaths. Nonhostile fatalities can include deaths resulting from accidents, sudden medical emergencies and self-inflicted injuries, including suicides. Such reporting has traditionally been intended to provide the public with a comprehensive record of the human cost borne by US service members and their families during military operations. The latest increase in the wounded tally comes as questions continue over the completeness and timing of the Pentagon's public casualty disclosures.

Pentagon casualty data shows 37 more US troops wounded in the Iran conflict, taking the total to 861, without explaining the new injuries

Pentagon quietly adds 37 wounded troops to Iran war tally without explaining when or how

A shipment of F-35 fighter jet parts, meant to travel from Australia to the US for repair, mysteriously ended up in Hong Kong instead, and nobody knows why or who has them now. Among the missing components: a cockpit canopy containing stealth technology exclusive to the US and its allies. With Hong Kong under Chinese administration, lawmakers fear Beijing could study the part to refine its own radar-detection capabilities. Congress has been briefed, and the Pentagon is now racing to recover the equipment.


Pentagon probes diverted F-35 parts: Stealth cockpit canopy ends up in Hong Kong

The Pentagon has released another batch of UFO files, containing 71 documents dated from 1952 to 2025. The disclosure includes reports from a secretive military programme that studied advanced aerospace concepts such as warp drives and wormholes. The documents were produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program, which explored potential future aerospace threats through 2050.

Pentagon releases sixth batch of UFO files

Pentagon has been accused of hiding the total fatalities in the US war in Iran by at least four. According to a Washington Post report, which cites five anonymous public officials, at least 22 US soldiers have died compared to 18 acknowledged publicly by the Pentagon. &nbsp;These reports have been denied by the US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.&nbsp;Hegseth, in a post on X, called the report, “This is DISGUSTING and FAKE. A complete LIE.”“Shame on the Washington Post — they’re worse than Iranian state media.”Major Sorffly Davius, who served in the 42nd Infantry Division at Camp Buehring, Kuwait, died of “undetermined causes”, and Sergeant Devin Seibel, who was assigned to the Air Ambulance Company, 2nd Battalion, 4th Combat Aviation Brigade, Fort Carson, died on May 31 in Erbil Air Base, Iraq, during a “training-related incident,” were not included in the Pentagon’s Defence Casualty Analysis System, reported Washington Post.Another official reportedly placed the figure at 23. He added that three US contractors who were based in the US CENTCOM region have died since the conflict began.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/sweden-pm-ulf-kristersson-resigns-centre-left-election-win-1789665664898">Sweden PM Kristersson resigns after centre-left bloc narrowly wins election</a>The discrepancy has come under heavy scrutiny alongside reports that at least 820 US service members have been wounded since the conflict began. Some of the family members have reportedly said that they have faced severe bureaucratic hurdles while trying to access survivor benefits due to the classification of the Iran war as “not a war”, "intermittent strikes" or "small potatoes".US Air Force Major John "Alex" Klinner died in a crash in Iraq in March, in an unspecified incident involving another aircraft while his KC-135 Air Force refuelling aircraft was in “friendly” airspace, supporting the war against Iran. His spouse, Libby Klinner, posted on Instagram last week that the Pentagon told her, “we haven't officially declared war”, so she and her kids aren't eligible for Death Gratuity and some other benefits."So, not only was my husband killed in a war he never wanted to participate in, but now the benefits we're left with are being dictated by semantics and public perception," she added.JD Vance, the US vice president, was asked about her case at a White House briefing on Thursday."We want to be as helpful as we can and ensure she gets everything that she is entitled to," he said. “My message to her would be, 'We love you, we're grateful for the sacrifice, and we very much take very seriously our commitment to get you what you need to get.”Beyond fatalities, families of the hundreds of wounded service members have accused the Pentagon of underreporting and downplaying the severity of injuries. Pete Hegseth publicly stated that nearly 90 per cent of wounded personnel suffered only "minor injuries" and returned to duty, though medical records and family testimonies from the Shuaiba attack on March 1, 2026 paint a different picture.57-year-old Chief Warrant Officer Rodney Bearman, who suffered a concussion, hearing and vision loss, and permanent damage to his lungs, was classified as “not seriously injured”. Similarly, Sergeant First Class Cory Hicks, who suffered a complex traumatic brain injury (TBI) and extensive shrapnel wounds that required multiple emergency surgeries and long-term care at Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre, was classified as “minor”.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Washington Post reports that at least 22 US troops have died in the Iran war, four more than the Pentagon’s public tally, a claim denied by Pete Hegseth.

Pentagon has been accused of hiding the total fatalities in the US war in Iran by at least four. According to a Washington Post report, which cites five anonymous public officials, at least 22 US soldiers have died compared to 18 acknowledged publicly by the Pentagon. These reports have been denied by the US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. Hegseth, in a post on X, called the report, “This is DISGUSTING and FAKE. A complete LIE.” “Shame on the Washington Post — they’re worse than Iranian state media.” Major Sorffly Davius, who served in the 42nd Infantry Division at Camp Buehring, Kuwait, died of “undetermined causes”, and Sergeant Devin Seibel, who was assigned to the Air Ambulance Company, 2nd Battalion, 4th Combat Aviation Brigade, Fort Carson, died on May 31 in Erbil Air Base, Iraq, during a “training-related incident,” were not included in the Pentagon’s Defence Casualty Analysis System, reported Washington Post. Another official reportedly placed the figure at 23. He added that three US contractors who were based in the US CENTCOM region have died since the conflict began. Also Read: Sweden PM Kristersson resigns after centre-left bloc narrowly wins election The discrepancy has come under heavy scrutiny alongside reports that at least 820 US service members have been wounded since the conflict began. Some of the family members have reportedly said that they have faced severe bureaucratic hurdles while trying to access survivor benefits due to the classification of the Iran war as “not a war”, "intermittent strikes" or "small potatoes". US Air Force Major John "Alex" Klinner died in a crash in Iraq in March, in an unspecified incident involving another aircraft while his KC-135 Air Force refuelling aircraft was in “friendly” airspace, supporting the war against Iran. His spouse, Libby Klinner, posted on Instagram last week that the Pentagon told her, “we haven't officially declared war”, so she and her kids aren't eligible for Death Gratuity and some other benefits. "So, not only was my husband killed in a war he never wanted to participate in, but now the benefits we're left with are being dictated by semantics and public perception," she added. JD Vance, the US vice president, was asked about her case at a White House briefing on Thursday. "We want to be as helpful as we can and ensure she gets everything that she is entitled to," he said. “My message to her would be, 'We love you, we're grateful for the sacrifice, and we very much take very seriously our commitment to get you what you need to get.” Beyond fatalities, families of the hundreds of wounded service members have accused the Pentagon of underreporting and downplaying the severity of injuries. Pete Hegseth publicly stated that nearly 90 per cent of wounded personnel suffered only "minor injuries" and returned to duty, though medical records and family testimonies from the Shuaiba attack on March 1, 2026 paint a different picture. 57-year-old Chief Warrant Officer Rodney Bearman, who suffered a concussion, hearing and vision loss, and permanent damage to his lungs, was classified as “not seriously injured”. Similarly, Sergeant First Class Cory Hicks, who suffered a complex traumatic brain injury (TBI) and extensive shrapnel wounds that required multiple emergency surgeries and long-term care at Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre, was classified as “minor”.

Washington Post reports that at least 22 US troops have died in the Iran war, four more than the Pentagon’s public tally, a claim denied by Pete Hegseth.

Pentagon accused of hiding US Iran war deaths as Hegseth denies report

The Pentagon is bringing back mandatory testing for testosterone deficiency among US service members aged 30 and above, reviving a programme that medical experts have criticised as unnecessary and potentially harmful.&nbsp;The new clinical guidance applies only to male service members and sets common procedures for screening and treating testosterone deficiency. The Pentagon said it will issue separate guidance for female service members at a later stage.&nbsp;The new rules require testosterone tests during periodic health assessments and annual physical examinations. Service members below the age of 30 can also undergo testing if they request it or if doctors believe it is medically necessary.&nbsp;“Effective immediately, this guidance addresses male testosterone deficiency, establishing uniform screening and treatment pathways,” Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement.<h3>Hegseth first announced testing plan</h3>US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth first announced the mandatory screening plan in July as he promoted testosterone use as a way to improve military readiness.&nbsp;Under the earlier guidance, women were also expected to undergo screening through a questionnaire, after which they could potentially receive treatment for conditions linked to hormonal imbalances.&nbsp;The latest guidance, however, makes clear that the mandatory testing programme currently covers only male service members. Hegseth’s July memo had called for testosterone deficiency screening for all troops, but the clinical guidance issued on Thursday specifically refers to “testosterone deficiency in the male service member”.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/drone-strikes-cooling-tower-at-russia-s-kursk-nuclear-plant-iaea-confirms-1789755853264">Drone strikes cooling tower at Russia's Kursk Nuclear Plant, IAEA confirms</a><h3>Growing interest in testosterone</h3>The Pentagon’s move comes as interest in testosterone has increased, particularly among men’s health influencers and podcasters who often promote the hormone as a way to increase energy, build muscle and make people feel younger.&nbsp;Medical experts, however, have questioned some of these wider claims, saying they are not supported by scientific evidence. Hegseth’s public messaging on testosterone has also combined established scientific information with broader claims that have less evidence behind them.&nbsp;The new guidance therefore establishes a specific screening and treatment process for male service members while leaving separate rules for female troops to be issued later.

The Pentagon has reinstated mandatory testosterone deficiency testing for male US service members aged 30 and above, with separate screening guidelines for female troops to be issued later.

The Pentagon is bringing back mandatory testing for testosterone deficiency among US service members aged 30 and above, reviving a programme that medical experts have criticised as unnecessary and potentially harmful. The new clinical guidance applies only to male service members and sets common procedures for screening and treating testosterone deficiency. The Pentagon said it will issue separate guidance for female service members at a later stage. The new rules require testosterone tests during periodic health assessments and annual physical examinations. Service members below the age of 30 can also undergo testing if they request it or if doctors believe it is medically necessary. “Effective immediately, this guidance addresses male testosterone deficiency, establishing uniform screening and treatment pathways,” Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement. Hegseth first announced testing plan US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth first announced the mandatory screening plan in July as he promoted testosterone use as a way to improve military readiness. Under the earlier guidance, women were also expected to undergo screening through a questionnaire, after which they could potentially receive treatment for conditions linked to hormonal imbalances. The latest guidance, however, makes clear that the mandatory testing programme currently covers only male service members. Hegseth’s July memo had called for testosterone deficiency screening for all troops, but the clinical guidance issued on Thursday specifically refers to “testosterone deficiency in the male service member”. Also Read: Drone strikes cooling tower at Russia's Kursk Nuclear Plant, IAEA confirms Growing interest in testosterone The Pentagon’s move comes as interest in testosterone has increased, particularly among men’s health influencers and podcasters who often promote the hormone as a way to increase energy, build muscle and make people feel younger. Medical experts, however, have questioned some of these wider claims, saying they are not supported by scientific evidence. Hegseth’s public messaging on testosterone has also combined established scientific information with broader claims that have less evidence behind them. The new guidance therefore establishes a specific screening and treatment process for male service members while leaving separate rules for female troops to be issued later.

The Pentagon has reinstated mandatory testosterone deficiency testing for male US service members aged 30 and above, with separate screening guidelines for female troops to be issued later.

Pentagon revives mandatory testosterone testing for male troops aged 30 and above

The Pentagon is asking military commanders to nominate servicemembers to attend Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “State of the Force” address on September 30, with candidates required to meet specific physical and grooming standards. According to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, nominees must meet the Army’s waist-to-height requirements, pass fitness tests and maintain “impeccable” grooming and uniform standards.&nbsp;Selected servicemembers will also have an opportunity to work out with Hegseth. Candidates will be chosen based on “demonstrated leadership quality and professional character,” according to the messages sent to military commanders. The planned event comes about a year after Hegseth ordered the nation’s senior generals and admirals to gather at Marine Corps Base Quantico for an address in which he declared “no more beardos” or “fat generals.”&nbsp;Since taking over as Pentagon chief last year, Hegseth has placed a strong emphasis on physical fitness and appearance across the armed forces. He has argued that maintaining rigorous physical standards is essential to ensuring the military can effectively fight wars. Critics have questioned the emphasis, arguing that Hegseth’s focus is too narrow and warning that military personnel should not be used to advance the administration’s political priorities.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-threatens-to-keep-kennedy-center-closed-after-judge-blocks-his-name-from-iconic-memorial-s-facade-1789538127990">Trump threatens to keep Kennedy Center closed after judge blocks his name from iconic memorial's facade</a><h2>Lower-ranking troops to attend</h2>Unlike last year’s gathering, which brought together senior military leadership, this year’s audience is expected to include lower-ranking officers and enlisted servicemembers, officials said. The Wall Street Journal previously reported that Hegseth was considering holding the event again. An email dated Tuesday and sent to Army commanders said the Pentagon was seeking servicemembers who meet specific “physical standards.” Candidates must pass the Army’s waist-to-height ratio requirements and fitness tests while maintaining “impeccable grooming and uniform standards (no exception).”&nbsp;The selection criteria also require nominees to be “consistently rated as top performers within their formations,” have a “clear record of integrity, discipline and selfless service,” “demonstrate strong presence, clear communication and sound judgment under pressure,” and “serve as role models for their peers and subordinates.” Officials said other military commands received similar versions of the message. A Pentagon official declined to comment.<h2>Hegseth's focus on the ‘warrior ethos’</h2>Hegseth’s decision last fall to convene the country’s generals and admirals at Quantico surprised some senior military officers. According to the report, officers only later learned that the meeting would focus on enforcing the “warrior ethos.” During the event, Hegseth outlined his priorities, including rejecting policies from the previous administration that he has described as “woke” and placing a renewed emphasis on “warfighting” as the Pentagon’s primary mission.&nbsp;“For too long, we have simply not done that. The military has been forced by foolish and reckless politicians to focus on the wrong things,” Hegseth said. “In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden.”The upcoming September 30 address is expected to continue Hegseth’s emphasis on military readiness, physical standards and professional conduct across the armed forces.

Pentagon seeks troops for Pete Hegseth’s September 30 'State of the Force' speech, requiring fitness tests, waist-to-height standards and strict grooming

The Pentagon is asking military commanders to nominate servicemembers to attend Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “State of the Force” address on September 30, with candidates required to meet specific physical and grooming standards. According to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, nominees must meet the Army’s waist-to-height requirements, pass fitness tests and maintain “impeccable” grooming and uniform standards. Selected servicemembers will also have an opportunity to work out with Hegseth. Candidates will be chosen based on “demonstrated leadership quality and professional character,” according to the messages sent to military commanders. The planned event comes about a year after Hegseth ordered the nation’s senior generals and admirals to gather at Marine Corps Base Quantico for an address in which he declared “no more beardos” or “fat generals.” Since taking over as Pentagon chief last year, Hegseth has placed a strong emphasis on physical fitness and appearance across the armed forces. He has argued that maintaining rigorous physical standards is essential to ensuring the military can effectively fight wars. Critics have questioned the emphasis, arguing that Hegseth’s focus is too narrow and warning that military personnel should not be used to advance the administration’s political priorities. Also Read: Trump threatens to keep Kennedy Center closed after judge blocks his name from iconic memorial's facade Lower-ranking troops to attend Unlike last year’s gathering, which brought together senior military leadership, this year’s audience is expected to include lower-ranking officers and enlisted servicemembers, officials said. The Wall Street Journal previously reported that Hegseth was considering holding the event again. An email dated Tuesday and sent to Army commanders said the Pentagon was seeking servicemembers who meet specific “physical standards.” Candidates must pass the Army’s waist-to-height ratio requirements and fitness tests while maintaining “impeccable grooming and uniform standards (no exception).” The selection criteria also require nominees to be “consistently rated as top performers within their formations,” have a “clear record of integrity, discipline and selfless service,” “demonstrate strong presence, clear communication and sound judgment under pressure,” and “serve as role models for their peers and subordinates.” Officials said other military commands received similar versions of the message. A Pentagon official declined to comment. Hegseth's focus on the ‘warrior ethos’ Hegseth’s decision last fall to convene the country’s generals and admirals at Quantico surprised some senior military officers. According to the report, officers only later learned that the meeting would focus on enforcing the “warrior ethos.” During the event, Hegseth outlined his priorities, including rejecting policies from the previous administration that he has described as “woke” and placing a renewed emphasis on “warfighting” as the Pentagon’s primary mission. “For too long, we have simply not done that. The military has been forced by foolish and reckless politicians to focus on the wrong things,” Hegseth said. “In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden.” The upcoming September 30 address is expected to continue Hegseth’s emphasis on military readiness, physical standards and professional conduct across the armed forces.

The Pentagon seeks troops for Pet Hegseth’s September 30 speech, requiring fitness, waist-to-height compliance, leadership records and strict grooming standards

Fit and impeccable? Pentagon sets standards for Hegseth's 'State of the Force' speech attendees

As Tehran continues to resist US pressure, Pentagon has come in for fresh criticism. It has now been accused of trying to deny benefits to families of US soldiers who have died in the Iran war.This came to light after Libby Klinner, the widow of Major Alex Klinner, voiced her frustration on social media.&nbsp;She was reportedly told by a military officer that she was ineligible for certain combat-related benefits, citing that US is technically not at war.Major Klinner was one of the six crew members of a KC-135 refueling aircraft that crashed in western Iraq in March.&nbsp;After her social media post went viral, US Air Force officials contacted her to initiate a review of her husband’s pay. Subsequently, they clarified that she would be receiving the full pay and benefits her husband was owed, including hazard pay as well as combat-related tax breaks.&nbsp;In wake of this, Libby Klinner urged everyone to ensure that every martyr's family should get clarity on the benefits from the outset.&nbsp;18 US military personnel have been killed and 780 others have been wounded since the beginning of the Iran war.&nbsp;Also, multiple bases across West Asia have suffered damage running into billions of dollars due to Iranian retaliatory strikes.&nbsp;The American leadership has been trying to downplay the Iran war ahead of November's midterm elections.&nbsp;For instance, US Vice President JD Vance rejected using the word 'war' to characterise US operations in Iran, saying that there was no active shooting.&nbsp;US President Donald Trump also backed Vance's stance, adding that the operation against Iran is 'small potatoes' for America.&nbsp;Now, after CENTCOM forces struck three Iranian crude oil carriers over the weekend in response to IRGC's ballistic missile attack on US warships, Tehran issued a stern warning.&nbsp;Iran's parliament speaker and key negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf emphasised that every violation of his country's security and assets will be met with a faster, heavier and more painful response...&nbsp;This is not all.&nbsp;Iran wants to further strengthen its stranglehold over the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;In an interview, Iran's supreme national security council head, Mohsen Rezai, announced that Tehran will soon announce a restricted zone outside Hormuz.&nbsp;Any vessel entering this zone will be placed on Iran's sanctions list.&nbsp;Amid this, Iran also revealed that its negotiations with Oman regarding designating a safe route for passage of ships through Hormuz have reached the final stage...&nbsp;While there has been a temporary lull in attacks between US and Iran, Israel has intensified its attacks on Lebanon. Plumes of smoke were seen after a barrage of artillery fire by Israel.&nbsp;In overnight air strikes by IDF on a village in southern Lebanon, at least eleven people, including two children, were killed. Visuals showed a spate of destruction.&nbsp;Rescuers were seen desperately trying to search for survivors amid the rubble...&nbsp;Now, as depleting weapon stockpiles haunt US and West Asia continues to bear the brunt of Iran's retaliatory strikes, is there a growing rethink on America's role in the region?&nbsp;Qatar, for instance, advocated a focus on self-sufficiency.&nbsp;As US struggles to break the stalemate, former Pentagon chief Leon Panetta issued a warning.&nbsp;He opined that the Iran war risks becoming another 'forever war' in West Asia and is likely to continue for six more months without being resolved...

As many as 18 US military personnel have been killed and 780 others have been wounded since the beginning of the Iran war. Also, multiple bases across West Asia have suffered damage running into billions of dollars due to Iranian retaliatory strikes.

As Tehran continues to resist US pressure, Pentagon has come in for fresh criticism. It has now been accused of trying to deny benefits to families of US soldiers who have died in the Iran war. This came to light after Libby Klinner, the widow of Major Alex Klinner, voiced her frustration on social media. She was reportedly told by a military officer that she was ineligible for certain combat-related benefits, citing that US is technically not at war. Major Klinner was one of the six crew members of a KC-135 refueling aircraft that crashed in western Iraq in March. After her social media post went viral, US Air Force officials contacted her to initiate a review of her husband’s pay. Subsequently, they clarified that she would be receiving the full pay and benefits her husband was owed, including hazard pay as well as combat-related tax breaks. In wake of this, Libby Klinner urged everyone to ensure that every martyr's family should get clarity on the benefits from the outset. 18 US military personnel have been killed and 780 others have been wounded since the beginning of the Iran war. Also, multiple bases across West Asia have suffered damage running into billions of dollars due to Iranian retaliatory strikes. The American leadership has been trying to downplay the Iran war ahead of November's midterm elections. For instance, US Vice President JD Vance rejected using the word 'war' to characterise US operations in Iran, saying that there was no active shooting. US President Donald Trump also backed Vance's stance, adding that the operation against Iran is 'small potatoes' for America. Now, after CENTCOM forces struck three Iranian crude oil carriers over the weekend in response to IRGC's ballistic missile attack on US warships, Tehran issued a stern warning. Iran's parliament speaker and key negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf emphasised that every violation of his country's security and assets will be met with a faster, heavier and more painful response... This is not all. Iran wants to further strengthen its stranglehold over the Strait of Hormuz. In an interview, Iran's supreme national security council head, Mohsen Rezai, announced that Tehran will soon announce a restricted zone outside Hormuz. Any vessel entering this zone will be placed on Iran's sanctions list. Amid this, Iran also revealed that its negotiations with Oman regarding designating a safe route for passage of ships through Hormuz have reached the final stage... While there has been a temporary lull in attacks between US and Iran, Israel has intensified its attacks on Lebanon. Plumes of smoke were seen after a barrage of artillery fire by Israel. In overnight air strikes by IDF on a village in southern Lebanon, at least eleven people, including two children, were killed. Visuals showed a spate of destruction. Rescuers were seen desperately trying to search for survivors amid the rubble... Now, as depleting weapon stockpiles haunt US and West Asia continues to bear the brunt of Iran's retaliatory strikes, is there a growing rethink on America's role in the region? Qatar, for instance, advocated a focus on self-sufficiency. As US struggles to break the stalemate, former Pentagon chief Leon Panetta issued a warning. He opined that the Iran war risks becoming another 'forever war' in West Asia and is likely to continue for six more months without being resolved...

As many as 18 US military personnel have been killed and 780 others have been wounded since the beginning of the Iran war. Also, multiple bases across West Asia have suffered damage running into billions of dollars due to Iranian retaliatory strikes.

Did US refuse payout for soldier killed in Iran War? Pentagon faces fresh scrutiny | Gravitas

Some of the highest-ranking officials in the US military have undergone polygraph tests as part of an investigation into the leak of highly classified information about the country’s weapons stockpiles, CBS reported, citing US officials.&nbsp;The investigation focuses on sensitive details about the supply of advanced weapons and ammunition. US officials became concerned because only a small number of people had access to the information.&nbsp;According to CBS, President Donald Trump was furious over the leaks. Officials also examined whether someone with access to the classified information could be working for a foreign intelligence service.&nbsp;However, the investigation did not include every senior military official. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, for example, did not take a polygraph test, according to the report.&nbsp;The latest action follows reports from July that the United States had started rationing some munitions, particularly missile interceptors, because of concerns over supplies after months of fighting with Iran.&nbsp;The reports prompted a stronger response from the Pentagon. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the Pentagon and the Justice Department had created a joint task force to investigate and prosecute people suspected of leaking sensitive government information to the media.&nbsp;Senior US officials rejected claims that the country faced a serious ammunition shortage.&nbsp;Trump said, “We have a lot of ammunition, different types,” while also acknowledging that “for some of the more sophisticated stuff, we'd certainly like to have more.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/13-years-on-nia-court-convicts-10-in-jhiram-ghati-attack-that-killed-29-including-senior-congress-leaders-1788620941877">13 years on, NIA court convicts 10 in Jhiram Ghati attack that killed 29 including senior Congress leaders</a><h3>Around 50 Joint Staff members tested</h3>The New York Times reported on Friday that around 50 members of the military’s Joint Staff had been ordered to take polygraph tests.&nbsp;The Joint Staff serves as the Pentagon’s main planning and advisory body. Investigators are trying to determine how classified information about US weapons stockpiles reached journalists.&nbsp;Polygraph tests are normally used during background checks and security clearance reviews for government employees who handle highly sensitive information.&nbsp;Using the tests on such a large scale during a leak investigation is highly unusual. Analysts and officials told the media that the move could be rare, if not unprecedented.&nbsp;The investigation comes as the Trump administration intensifies efforts to stop unauthorised disclosures of classified information from within the US government.

Trump administration has expanded a rare investigation into classified weapons leaks by subjecting some senior US military officials and around 50 Joint Staff members to polygraph tests.

Some of the highest-ranking officials in the US military have undergone polygraph tests as part of an investigation into the leak of highly classified information about the country’s weapons stockpiles, CBS reported, citing US officials. The investigation focuses on sensitive details about the supply of advanced weapons and ammunition. US officials became concerned because only a small number of people had access to the information. According to CBS, President Donald Trump was furious over the leaks. Officials also examined whether someone with access to the classified information could be working for a foreign intelligence service. However, the investigation did not include every senior military official. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, for example, did not take a polygraph test, according to the report. The latest action follows reports from July that the United States had started rationing some munitions, particularly missile interceptors, because of concerns over supplies after months of fighting with Iran. The reports prompted a stronger response from the Pentagon. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the Pentagon and the Justice Department had created a joint task force to investigate and prosecute people suspected of leaking sensitive government information to the media. Senior US officials rejected claims that the country faced a serious ammunition shortage. Trump said, “We have a lot of ammunition, different types,” while also acknowledging that “for some of the more sophisticated stuff, we'd certainly like to have more.” Also Read: 13 years on, NIA court convicts 10 in Jhiram Ghati attack that killed 29 including senior Congress leaders Around 50 Joint Staff members tested The New York Times reported on Friday that around 50 members of the military’s Joint Staff had been ordered to take polygraph tests. The Joint Staff serves as the Pentagon’s main planning and advisory body. Investigators are trying to determine how classified information about US weapons stockpiles reached journalists. Polygraph tests are normally used during background checks and security clearance reviews for government employees who handle highly sensitive information. Using the tests on such a large scale during a leak investigation is highly unusual. Analysts and officials told the media that the move could be rare, if not unprecedented. The investigation comes as the Trump administration intensifies efforts to stop unauthorised disclosures of classified information from within the US government.

Trump administration has expanded a rare investigation into classified weapons leaks by subjecting some senior US military officials and around 50 Joint Staff members to polygraph tests.

US military officials face lie detector tests over depleting weapons stockpile leak amid Iran war

The US Army secretary's exit has been the latest on a long list of high-profile departures in trump's america. What's happening behind the scenes? Decoding the developments behind the scenes.


Great Pentagon rebellion: 80 Generals, Admirals defy Trump, Hegseth, get sacked 

U.S. President Donald Trump claims Iran is a failed nation...But look closer...And you see how cracks within the Pentagon are widening.With the resignation of U.S. Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, the extent of damage by Iran continues to startle America...Iranian state media released these visuals of ballistic missiles being fired at the U.S. bases of King Hussein and Muwaffaq Salti in Jordan. This was a retaliation for America's strike on two launchers in Larak Island, which resulted in multiple civilian and military casualties.Although Jordan's army claimed to have averted any damage by destroying eight Iranian missiles that breached its airspace, satellite imagery depicts a different story.Take a look at these images.According to Iranian state media, they confirm a direct impact and extensive damage to an aircraft hangar at the Muwaffaq Salti air base.While trying to repel Iran's strikes, a report claimed that U.S. forces fired over 80 Patriot interceptor missiles, which could account for around ten per cent of the remaining U.S. stockpile of these missiles. It added that up to four interceptors were fired at each Iranian missile.Now, this assumes significance, as three U.S. military personnel were killed in the last Iranian ballistic and drone attack on this Jordan air base on July 17.Frustrated by Iran's resistance, Trump lost his cool when asked about the possibility of using nuclear weapons on Iran.Ironically, Trump's bravado comes at a time when key military leaders advised U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth against extending operations against Iran. They reportedly warned him that prolonging the war is unsustainable and risks weakening the U.S. military's ability to confront threats elsewhere.Amid this, Daniel Driscoll, who oversaw operations, modernisation and resource allocation for nearly one million active and reserve soldiers, quit after months of friction with Hegseth.Now, let's take a brief look at his background.Driscoll was commissioned into the U.S. Army in 2007, after which he was deployed to Iraq. He has received multiple military awards, including the Army Recommendation Medal and Combat Action Badge.After retiring from the Army, he held leadership positions in investment banking, private equity and business operations, such as the COO of a 200 million U.S. dollar venture capital fund.In February 2025, he became the youngest-ever U.S. Secretary of the Army. He is said to be close to U.S. Vice President JD Vance.He came into the spotlight last year, after Trump chose him to take part in talks with Moscow and Kyiv to end the war in Ukraine.But what was the trigger for his exit?According to Reuters, he reportedly raised concerns about Hegseth blocking his efforts to modernise the Army. He was reportedly miffed at the U.S. Secretary of War firing generals who were leading these efforts.Driscoll was believed to be pushing the Army to acquire cheaper weapons.The report claimed that while Hegseth long wanted to remove Driscoll, his ties to Vance made it tough for him to do so.U.S. Army Chief Randy George's ouster in April reportedly caught Driscoll off guard and led to his increased frustration with Trump.Hegseth has been under scrutiny for blocking the promotion of senior Army officials and his leadership during the ongoing Iran war.This is not all.According to the report, Deputy Under-Secretary of Army Dave FitzGerald, who has been focusing on innovation, is also likely to quit soon.While it is unclear whether Driscoll's resignation has been accepted, White House lauded his outstanding leadership role in advancing Trump's agenda to make America strong again and restore an emphasis on readiness and lethality.At a time when the U.S. is dealing with depleted weapon stockpiles and exhausted personnel, its Army's top civilian and uniformed leadership positions are vacant now...However, is the U.S. contemplating a return to hostilities in West Asia?According to Axios, Trump and his senior aides have been considering waging limited strikes in the Strait of Hormuz. This is aimed at preventing Iran from reconstituting its radar and missile capabilities to attack ships.While the U.S. President sparked speculation in this regard by posting an AI-generated video of an attack on Iran's oil lifeline of Kharg Island, Vance construed it as a message to the Iranians.Speaking at the SCO summit in Bishkek, Pezeshkian made a key intervention. He accused the U.S. of making excessive demands and breaching its commitments less than two weeks after signing the memorandum of understanding with Iran.At the same time, he made it clear that Iran will reciprocate if the U.S. honours the MOU.Pezeshkian's stance is vital, as Iranians have been bearing the brunt of the U.S. naval blockade as well as the enhanced economic sanctions.With the Iranian president extending an olive branch, will America now reciprocate?All eyes will be on the next few days to determine Trump's future course of action.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-unleashes-fury-on-us-base-in-jordan-frustrated-trump-erupts-over-nuke-question-1788286787276/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-unleashes-fury-on-us-base-in-jordan-frustrated-trump-erupts-over-nuke-question-1788286787276/embed</a>&nbsp;

Donald Trump faces growing Pentagon tensions as Iran strikes US bases, Daniel Driscoll resigns and Washington weighs possible renewed strikes.

U.S. President Donald Trump claims Iran is a failed nation... But look closer... And you see how cracks within the Pentagon are widening. With the resignation of U.S. Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, the extent of damage by Iran continues to startle America... Iranian state media released these visuals of ballistic missiles being fired at the U.S. bases of King Hussein and Muwaffaq Salti in Jordan. This was a retaliation for America's strike on two launchers in Larak Island, which resulted in multiple civilian and military casualties. Although Jordan's army claimed to have averted any damage by destroying eight Iranian missiles that breached its airspace, satellite imagery depicts a different story. Take a look at these images. According to Iranian state media, they confirm a direct impact and extensive damage to an aircraft hangar at the Muwaffaq Salti air base. While trying to repel Iran's strikes, a report claimed that U.S. forces fired over 80 Patriot interceptor missiles, which could account for around ten per cent of the remaining U.S. stockpile of these missiles. It added that up to four interceptors were fired at each Iranian missile. Now, this assumes significance, as three U.S. military personnel were killed in the last Iranian ballistic and drone attack on this Jordan air base on July 17. Frustrated by Iran's resistance, Trump lost his cool when asked about the possibility of using nuclear weapons on Iran. Ironically, Trump's bravado comes at a time when key military leaders advised U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth against extending operations against Iran. They reportedly warned him that prolonging the war is unsustainable and risks weakening the U.S. military's ability to confront threats elsewhere. Amid this, Daniel Driscoll, who oversaw operations, modernisation and resource allocation for nearly one million active and reserve soldiers, quit after months of friction with Hegseth. Now, let's take a brief look at his background. Driscoll was commissioned into the U.S. Army in 2007, after which he was deployed to Iraq. He has received multiple military awards, including the Army Recommendation Medal and Combat Action Badge. After retiring from the Army, he held leadership positions in investment banking, private equity and business operations, such as the COO of a 200 million U.S. dollar venture capital fund. In February 2025, he became the youngest-ever U.S. Secretary of the Army. He is said to be close to U.S. Vice President JD Vance. He came into the spotlight last year, after Trump chose him to take part in talks with Moscow and Kyiv to end the war in Ukraine. But what was the trigger for his exit? According to Reuters, he reportedly raised concerns about Hegseth blocking his efforts to modernise the Army. He was reportedly miffed at the U.S. Secretary of War firing generals who were leading these efforts. Driscoll was believed to be pushing the Army to acquire cheaper weapons. The report claimed that while Hegseth long wanted to remove Driscoll, his ties to Vance made it tough for him to do so. U.S. Army Chief Randy George's ouster in April reportedly caught Driscoll off guard and led to his increased frustration with Trump. Hegseth has been under scrutiny for blocking the promotion of senior Army officials and his leadership during the ongoing Iran war. This is not all. According to the report, Deputy Under-Secretary of Army Dave FitzGerald, who has been focusing on innovation, is also likely to quit soon. While it is unclear whether Driscoll's resignation has been accepted, White House lauded his outstanding leadership role in advancing Trump's agenda to make America strong again and restore an emphasis on readiness and lethality. At a time when the U.S. is dealing with depleted weapon stockpiles and exhausted personnel, its Army's top civilian and uniformed leadership positions are vacant now... However, is the U.S. contemplating a return to hostilities in West Asia? According to Axios, Trump and his senior aides have been considering waging limited strikes in the Strait of Hormuz. This is aimed at preventing Iran from reconstituting its radar and missile capabilities to attack ships. While the U.S. President sparked speculation in this regard by posting an AI-generated video of an attack on Iran's oil lifeline of Kharg Island, Vance construed it as a message to the Iranians. Speaking at the SCO summit in Bishkek, Pezeshkian made a key intervention. He accused the U.S. of making excessive demands and breaching its commitments less than two weeks after signing the memorandum of understanding with Iran. At the same time, he made it clear that Iran will reciprocate if the U.S. honours the MOU. Pezeshkian's stance is vital, as Iranians have been bearing the brunt of the U.S. naval blockade as well as the enhanced economic sanctions. With the Iranian president extending an olive branch, will America now reciprocate? All eyes will be on the next few days to determine Trump's future course of action. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-unleashes-fury-on-us-base-in-jordan-frustrated-trump-erupts-over-nuke-question-1788286787276/embed

Donald Trump faces growing Pentagon tensions as Iran strikes US bases, Daniel Driscoll resigns and Washington weighs possible renewed strikes.

Iran unleashes fury on US base in Jordan, frustrated Trump erupts over nuke question | Gravitas

The Pentagon is weighing a possible reduction or repositioning of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf after months of war with Iran exposed vulnerabilities at American bases and pushed the conflict’s estimated cost to $37.5 billion. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also sought billions in additional funding to replenish weapons and sustain military readiness. The debate could reshape America’s long-standing military footprint in West Asia.


$37.5 billion Iran war cost adds pressure to US decisions

Pentagon announced on Monday that it had awarded Raytheon, an RTX business, a $22.9 billion US Navy contract aimed at rapidly expanding production of Tomahawk cruise missiles. This comes amid concerns about inventories of air defence and precision-guided ​weapons amid the war in Iran."The Department called upon industry to expand munitions production, and RTX has answered that call,” said Michael P Duffey, the under secretary of defence for acquisition and sustainment. “This Tomahawk award increases our ability to equip the Joint Force, ensuring our Warfighters never face a fair fight.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/andy-burnham-susie-wiles-impersonator-security-breach-1786974370048">UK PM Andy Burnham duped by Trump's aide Susie Wiles impersonator in security breach</a>Think-tank analyses, including reports from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), noted that active conflicts have heavily drained US stockpiles of long-range precision weapons and air-defence interceptors. The deal is meant to accelerate manufacturing capacity to build more than 1,000 Tomahawk missiles per year. It is a seven-year, multi-year procurement contract for &nbsp;RTX Corporation, which currently makes just 60 a year. Tomahawk is a long-range cruise missile used by the US Navy for its precision strike ​capability.“Guaranteeing our naval and joint forces have the lethal firepower they need to deter aggression and protect the homeland is paramount,” said Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao. “This landmark $22.9 billion investment will accelerate Tomahawk missile delivery to our warfighters at unprecedented speed.”&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

The Pentagon has awarded Raytheon a $22.9 billion US Navy contract to rapidly expand Tomahawk missile production amid concerns over depleted US weapons stockpiles.

Pentagon announced on Monday that it had awarded Raytheon, an RTX business, a $22.9 billion US Navy contract aimed at rapidly expanding production of Tomahawk cruise missiles. This comes amid concerns about inventories of air defence and precision-guided weapons amid the war in Iran. "The Department called upon industry to expand munitions production, and RTX has answered that call,” said Michael P Duffey, the under secretary of defence for acquisition and sustainment. “This Tomahawk award increases our ability to equip the Joint Force, ensuring our Warfighters never face a fair fight.” Also Read: UK PM Andy Burnham duped by Trump's aide Susie Wiles impersonator in security breach Think-tank analyses, including reports from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), noted that active conflicts have heavily drained US stockpiles of long-range precision weapons and air-defence interceptors. The deal is meant to accelerate manufacturing capacity to build more than 1,000 Tomahawk missiles per year. It is a seven-year, multi-year procurement contract for RTX Corporation, which currently makes just 60 a year. Tomahawk is a long-range cruise missile used by the US Navy for its precision strike capability. “Guaranteeing our naval and joint forces have the lethal firepower they need to deter aggression and protect the homeland is paramount,” said Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao. “This landmark $22.9 billion investment will accelerate Tomahawk missile delivery to our warfighters at unprecedented speed.”

The Pentagon has awarded Raytheon a $22.9 billion US Navy contract to rapidly expand Tomahawk missile production amid concerns over depleted US weapons stockpiles.

Pentagon awards Raytheon $22.9 billion contract to ramp up Tomahawk missile production

President Donald Trump has ordered a major overhaul of U.S. Navy shipbuilding, including a return to traditional steam-powered aircraft catapults on future aircraft carriers.

The decision targets the electromagnetic aircraft launch system used on the Gerald R. Ford-class carriers. Trump has criticised the technology as expensive and complex, while supporters argue that electromagnetic systems offer important advantages in aircraft operations and maintenance.

The order also opens the door for foreign shipbuilders to participate more directly in U.S. military shipbuilding, under conditions requiring investment in American shipyards, workforce expansion, technology transfer and U.S.-based supply chains.

The move comes as Washington faces growing concerns over China's rapidly expanding naval shipbuilding capacity. China currently operates three aircraft carriers, while its latest carrier, Fujian, also uses electromagnetic launch technology

Trump Orders U.S. Navy To Bring Back Steam Catapults | Foreign Shipbuilders Get Historic Access

The prolonged Iran war is putting growing pressure on the US military’s weapons stockpile, with reports indicating significant losses of drones and the rapid use of key munitions.

According to the report cited in the segment, the US military has lost 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones, roughly a quarter of its fleet. The losses come alongside heavy expenditure of Tomahawk cruise missiles, Patriot interceptors and other long-range weapons.

The depletion is raising questions over US military readiness, future operations and Washington’s ability to sustain a prolonged conflict. Analysts are also warning that replenishing some advanced weapons could take considerable time.

Meanwhile, reports surrounding conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln have added another layer of pressure, although US military officials have disputed claims of deaths aboard the carrier.

As weapons stocks decline and public concerns grow, the Iran war is becoming an increasingly difficult test for the Trump administration.

 Gorkhas Rise Up in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army

Gorkhas Rise in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army  | GRAVITAS 

The prolonged Iran war is putting growing pressure on the US military’s weapons stockpile, with reports indicating significant losses of drones and the rapid use of key munitions.

According to the report cited in the segment, the US military has lost 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones, roughly a quarter of its fleet. The losses come alongside heavy expenditure of Tomahawk cruise missiles, Patriot interceptors and other long-range weapons.

The depletion is raising questions over US military readiness, future operations and Washington’s ability to sustain a prolonged conflict. Analysts are also warning that replenishing some advanced weapons could take considerable time.

Meanwhile, reports surrounding conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln have added another layer of pressure, although US military officials have disputed claims of deaths aboard the carrier.

Iran War Drains US Weapons Stockpile | Trump Faces Growing Military Pressure | GRAVITAS

The Pentagon on Friday (August 14) announced framework agreements with Boeing and RTX to increase the production of components for SM-3 Block IIA and SM-3 Block IB munitions.&nbsp;The agreements will help strengthen the production of critical ship-fired surface-to-air interceptors used by the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defence System, the Pentagon said in a statement.&nbsp;The move comes amid reports that the United States has utilised most of its interceptors, including nearly 80% of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) missile interceptors during the war with Iran. A recent report, citing multiple sources familiar with the matter, also said that around half of the US stockpile of Patriot missile interceptors had been used.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/lebanon-ends-death-penalty-becomes-first-in-middle-east-where-does-region-stand-1786455615136">Lebanon ends death penalty, becomes first in Middle East; where does region stand?</a><h2>Reports raise concerns over US missile defence stockpiles</h2>CNN reported that senior US military commanders had warned that the Pentagon's stockpile of key missile defence systems had fallen to "dangerously low" levels following operations linked to the Iran conflict.&nbsp;The report said concerns over the depletion of interceptors were among the factors that influenced US President Donald Trump to delay a planned large-scale strike against Iran over the weekend.&nbsp;The White House rejected that claim, saying Trump's decision followed pressure from Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, rather than concerns about missile inventories.&nbsp;US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth also dismissed the CNN report as inaccurate. In a post on X on Tuesday, Hegseth wrote: "That banner is NOT TRUE, @CNN. Shame on you. We don't hate the Fake News media enough."&nbsp;The Pentagon has not publicly disclosed figures on its current stockpiles of THAAD or Patriot interceptors.&nbsp;Earlier, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimated that the US had used about 65% of its Patriot interceptors between February and July. The think tank also estimated that the number of THAAD interceptors in US stockpiles was at least 38% lower than at the start of the conflict.

The Pentagon has signed framework agreements with Boeing and RTX to ramp up SM-3 missile interceptor production amid concerns over US missile defence stockpiles following the Iran war.

The Pentagon on Friday (August 14) announced framework agreements with Boeing and RTX to increase the production of components for SM-3 Block IIA and SM-3 Block IB munitions. The agreements will help strengthen the production of critical ship-fired surface-to-air interceptors used by the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defence System, the Pentagon said in a statement. The move comes amid reports that the United States has utilised most of its interceptors, including nearly 80% of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) missile interceptors during the war with Iran. A recent report, citing multiple sources familiar with the matter, also said that around half of the US stockpile of Patriot missile interceptors had been used. Also Read: Lebanon ends death penalty, becomes first in Middle East; where does region stand? Reports raise concerns over US missile defence stockpiles CNN reported that senior US military commanders had warned that the Pentagon's stockpile of key missile defence systems had fallen to "dangerously low" levels following operations linked to the Iran conflict. The report said concerns over the depletion of interceptors were among the factors that influenced US President Donald Trump to delay a planned large-scale strike against Iran over the weekend. The White House rejected that claim, saying Trump's decision followed pressure from Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, rather than concerns about missile inventories. US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth also dismissed the CNN report as inaccurate. In a post on X on Tuesday, Hegseth wrote: "That banner is NOT TRUE, @CNN. Shame on you. We don't hate the Fake News media enough." The Pentagon has not publicly disclosed figures on its current stockpiles of THAAD or Patriot interceptors. Earlier, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimated that the US had used about 65% of its Patriot interceptors between February and July. The think tank also estimated that the number of THAAD interceptors in US stockpiles was at least 38% lower than at the start of the conflict.

The Pentagon has signed framework agreements with Boeing and RTX to ramp up SM-3 missile interceptor production amid concerns over US missile defence stockpiles following the Iran war.

Pentagon signs Boeing, RTX deals to boost missile interceptor production amid Iran war stockpile concerns

The U.S. Department of war is reportedly drafting a revised classified nuclear strategy led by defence planners to give the Commander-in-Chief new options in regional conflicts. The policy focuses on integrating lower-yield tactical nuclear weapons to defend allies from attacks by Russia or China. We break down what tactical nukes are, and what this strategy means for NATO allies.

Trump Goes Nuclear, Prepares for War with China, Russia | GRAVITAS 

Donald Trump's military strategy is facing renewed scrutiny as concerns grow over U.S. weapons stockpiles and defense production. Questions are mounting over whether Washington can simultaneously support Ukraine, maintain pressure on Iran, deter China, and reassure allies without overstretching its military resources. As debates intensify over Patriot missile supplies, logistics, and industrial capacity, analysts warn that inventory shortages could become a major strategic challenge for the United States.

Trump's War Strategy Under Fire | U.S. Weapons Shortage Raises Questions Over Ukraine, Iran & China

Reports claim U.S. President Donald Trump clashed with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over concerns about shrinking U.S. munitions stockpiles amid ongoing military operations. According to reports, Trump sought answers over missile shortages and the Pentagon's preparedness, while the White House has disputed accounts of a major confrontation and insists the United States has sufficient weapons supplies.

Donald Trump Reportedly Clashed with Pete Hegseth Over the Shortage of Munitions 

Preparing for a probable long-term strategic shift, the US Department of Defense is drafting a new nuclear strategy that prepares for the potential use of shorter-range tactical weapons in a regional war against China or Russia. The Defense Department policy chief Elbridge Colby is reportedly drafting a nuclear weapons strategy to prepare for a potential conflict with Russia or China, reported NBC News.&nbsp;The strategy will underline the possible use of shorter-range tactical weapons in the event of a territorial dispute.&nbsp;The tactics shared with NBC News by five people familiar with the matter reflect internal planning rather than an adopted policy.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/strait-of-hormuz-deal-with-oman-being-finalised-iran-s-foreign-ministry-1785945741501">Strait of Hormuz deal with Oman being ‘finalised’: Iran’s foreign ministry</a>&nbsp;Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. Sources said the strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict.&nbsp;The new strategy will primarily focus on any probable regional confrontations with Russia and China, which Washington regards as its principal nuclear rivals.&nbsp;The strategizing is being overseen by Elbridge Colby, the deputy secretary of defense for policy, who played a key role in halting US military aid to Ukraine and in reshaping the American military presence in Europe.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-army-discards-whatsapp-over-spying-and-data-breach-fears-switches-to-china-s-wechat-1785933108236">Pakistan Army discards WhatsApp over spying and data breach fears, switches to China’s WeChat</a><h2>New plan to favour larger role for tactical nuclear weapons</h2>&nbsp;Colby is in favour of a larger role for tactical nuclear weapons in a shift from the current approach that relies on long-range strategic systems to destroy an enemy’s nuclear forces.&nbsp;&nbsp;He argues that adversaries already understand that the US is prepared to use such weapons.&nbsp;However, the approach has unsettled some specialists, who are of the view that the tactic could weaken deterrence by making the threat of a large-scale nuclear strike appear less credible. They also warned it might leave US forces less prepared for a full nuclear exchange in certain scenarios.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/munir-protege-mohsin-naqvi-s-claim-of-unearthing-huge-scam-triggers-tremors-in-pakistan-s-power-corridors-1785869067161">Munir-protege Mohsin Naqvi’s claim of unearthing huge scam triggers tremors in Pakistan’s power corridors</a>&nbsp;Colby was due to present his proposals on Wednesday at a closed military event in Nebraska during a visit to US Strategic Command, which oversees the country’s nuclear forces.The strategy also seems to be at odds with President Donald Trump’s stated goal “that we should make our nuclear deterrence system great again,” which implies that he wants more deterrence capabilities, not fewer.&nbsp;<h2>130 bodies on watchlist of US Defense Department</h2>&nbsp;The Defense Department’s watchlist names 130 organisations and institutions across China, Russia, and Iran whose activities it considers a threat to US national security.The reassessment gains urgency since the last strategic arms control treaty between Washington and Moscow lapsed in February 2026.&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump and his administration have earlier signalled that they were weighing the deployment of additional nuclear weapons and some form of nuclear testing.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/organised-groups-turned-students-stir-into-violent-protest-says-sheikh-hasina-1785936691644">‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest,’ says Sheikh Hasina</a><h2>NATO members evince interest in hosting US nuclear weapons</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, several eastern-flank NATO members, including Poland and the Baltic states, have shown interest in hosting US nuclear weapons.Earlier decisions to cancel planned deployments and redirect military assets unsettled some European nations, which fear gaps in the deterrence and have started making autonomous arrangements, like Norway’s move to join France's nuclear umbrella.&nbsp;The Pentagon previously cautioned that the US faces two major nuclear rivals at the same time in China and Russia. Moreover, China is receiving training, intelligence and advanced military technology from Russia as it helps Moscow in the war against Ukraine.

Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. The strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict.

Preparing for a probable long-term strategic shift, the US Department of Defense is drafting a new nuclear strategy that prepares for the potential use of shorter-range tactical weapons in a regional war against China or Russia. The Defense Department policy chief Elbridge Colby is reportedly drafting a nuclear weapons strategy to prepare for a potential conflict with Russia or China, reported NBC News. The strategy will underline the possible use of shorter-range tactical weapons in the event of a territorial dispute. The tactics shared with NBC News by five people familiar with the matter reflect internal planning rather than an adopted policy. Also Read: Strait of Hormuz deal with Oman being ‘finalised’: Iran’s foreign ministry Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. Sources said the strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict. The new strategy will primarily focus on any probable regional confrontations with Russia and China, which Washington regards as its principal nuclear rivals. The strategizing is being overseen by Elbridge Colby, the deputy secretary of defense for policy, who played a key role in halting US military aid to Ukraine and in reshaping the American military presence in Europe. Also Read: Pakistan Army discards WhatsApp over spying and data breach fears, switches to China’s WeChat New plan to favour larger role for tactical nuclear weapons Colby is in favour of a larger role for tactical nuclear weapons in a shift from the current approach that relies on long-range strategic systems to destroy an enemy’s nuclear forces. He argues that adversaries already understand that the US is prepared to use such weapons. However, the approach has unsettled some specialists, who are of the view that the tactic could weaken deterrence by making the threat of a large-scale nuclear strike appear less credible. They also warned it might leave US forces less prepared for a full nuclear exchange in certain scenarios. Also Read: Munir-protege Mohsin Naqvi’s claim of unearthing huge scam triggers tremors in Pakistan’s power corridors Colby was due to present his proposals on Wednesday at a closed military event in Nebraska during a visit to US Strategic Command, which oversees the country’s nuclear forces. The strategy also seems to be at odds with President Donald Trump’s stated goal “that we should make our nuclear deterrence system great again,” which implies that he wants more deterrence capabilities, not fewer. 130 bodies on watchlist of US Defense Department The Defense Department’s watchlist names 130 organisations and institutions across China, Russia, and Iran whose activities it considers a threat to US national security. The reassessment gains urgency since the last strategic arms control treaty between Washington and Moscow lapsed in February 2026. Trump and his administration have earlier signalled that they were weighing the deployment of additional nuclear weapons and some form of nuclear testing. Also Read: ‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest,’ says Sheikh Hasina NATO members evince interest in hosting US nuclear weapons Meanwhile, several eastern-flank NATO members, including Poland and the Baltic states, have shown interest in hosting US nuclear weapons. Earlier decisions to cancel planned deployments and redirect military assets unsettled some European nations, which fear gaps in the deterrence and have started making autonomous arrangements, like Norway’s move to join France's nuclear umbrella. The Pentagon previously cautioned that the US faces two major nuclear rivals at the same time in China and Russia. Moreover, China is receiving training, intelligence and advanced military technology from Russia as it helps Moscow in the war against Ukraine.

Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. The strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict.

Pentagon draws up new nuclear strategy in the event of war with Russia and China

Israel says it has killed several Hezbollah fighters in southern Lebanon despite an existing ceasefire, while reporting that an Israeli soldier was injured during operations. The Israeli military says it will continue targeting what it describes as Hezbollah threats inside a security zone.

The developments come as the United Nations voices concern over Israeli military actions, particularly after large-scale explosions near the UNESCO-listed Beaufort Castle in southern Lebanon. Meanwhile, Hezbollah continues to reject calls for disarmament despite a U.S.-backed framework agreement aimed at reducing hostilities.

U.S. Running Out of Missiles? Israel-Hezbollah Clash Escalates Amid Iran War

pentagon

Pentagon, News on Pentagon, stories on Pentagon, articles on Pentagon, Pentagon stories at Wion, Pentagon news, Pentagon latest news

pentagon

US War Secretary Pete Hegseth slams move to impeach him

Is Pentagon quietly telling European allies to ease up on Russia? What we know

American military crisis explodes, berserk Hegseth fires yet another top general

US to get 850 F-35 stealth fighter jets under 10-year Pentagon-Lockheed deal

US-Iran war: Pentagon pushes hypersonic weapons production

Pentagon vows to livestream Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan's execution

Religious Affairs office at Pentagon triggers outrage, Hegseth slammed for move

Iran war: US officials says actual military death toll may also be higher

Pentagon quietly adds 37 wounded troops to Iran war tally without an explanation

Pentagon probes diverted F-35 parts: Stealth cockpit canopy ends up in Hong Kong

Pentagon releases sixth batch of UFO files

Pentagon accused of hiding US Iran war deaths as Hegseth denies report

Pentagon revives mandatory testosterone testing for male troops aged 30 and above

Fit and impeccable? Pentagon sets standards for Pete Hegseth's speech attendees

Did US refuse payout for soldier killed in Iran War? Pentagon faces scrutiny

Senior US military officials face lie detector tests over weapons stockpile leak

Great Pentagon rebellion: 80 Generals, Admirals defy Trump, Hegseth, get sacked

Trump faces Pentagon turmoil as Iran strikes US bases in Jordan | Gravitas

$37.5 billion Iran war cost adds pressure to US decisions

Pentagon awards Raytheon $22.9 billion contract to ramp up Tomahawk production

Trump Orders U.S. Navy To Bring Back Steam Catapults | Foreign Shipbuilders Get Historic Access

Gorkhas Rise Up in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army

Gorkhas Rise in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army | GRAVITAS

Iran War Drains US Weapons Stockpile | Trump Faces Growing Military Pressure | GRAVITAS