The Trump administration is facing growing scrutiny over the handling of US military casualty records linked to the Iran war. A reported discrepancy on the Pentagon’s casualty website has triggered criticism from lawmakers, military analysts, and opponents who accuse officials of changing classifications to reduce the visible impact of American losses. According to reports, four recent US military deaths temporarily disappeared from the Defense Department’s casualty reporting website. When they returned, they were listed under a different category called “Overseas Operations” instead of Operation Epic Fury.

Pentagon Faces Backlash Over US Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Under Fire

The Trump administration is facing mounting criticism over how US military casualties from the Iran conflict are being reported. A controversy erupted after four American service members who died during the conflict temporarily disappeared from the Pentagon's casualty reporting website before reappearing under a different category.

Critics argue the reclassification could obscure the true human cost of the conflict and influence legal and political debates surrounding the war. Democratic lawmakers have demanded greater transparency, while questions continue over whether the administration's reporting complies with the War Powers Act and provides the public with a complete picture of US military losses.

Pentagon Under Fire Over Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Faces Backlash

The Pentagon has confirmed that Elon Musk's Grok AI was used as part of military systems supporting Operation Epic Fury against Iran. According to court filings and Pentagon disclosures, Grok was integrated into Project Maven's smart systems, helping process vast amounts of data during strike operations. The revelation marks one of the clearest examples yet of advanced artificial intelligence being used to support modern military missions, raising new questions about the future of AI in warfare.


Pentagon Confirms Grok Helped Support Operation Epic Fury Against Iran

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers during the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Wednesday that the US military’s Iran war operation has ended, and hence, forces are not conducting sustained strikes inside Iran anymore, as Operation Epic Fury had achieved its objectives.Responding to questions from Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., Rubio said, “Epic Fury has concluded.”“We’re no longer conducting sustained strikes inside of Iran to degrade their military because Epic Fury is over,” Rubio said while asserting a US victory.&nbsp;“We define victory as destroying their defence industrial base, significantly reducing the number of missile launchers that they possess, significantly reducing their stockpile of drones,” Rubio said.&nbsp;“And we achieved all those, in addition to destroying what they had left of an air force and wiping out their entire conventional navy,” he added.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">VIDEO | Washington: &quot;We defined victory by destroying Iran’s defense industrial base, significantly reducing number of missile launchers, their stockpile of drones,&quot; said US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. (Source: Third Party) <a href="https://t.co/TuqzwEkkzd">pic.twitter.com/TuqzwEkkzd</a>&mdash; Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) <a href="https://x.com/PTI_News/status/2062217381586559143?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 3, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-respects-me-and-i-respect-him-says-netanyahu-after-f-ing-crazy-phone-call-rebuke-1780502823440">Trump ‘respects’ me, and I ‘respect’ him, says Netanyahu after ‘f***ing crazy’ phone call rebuke</a><h2>‘Strikes near Strait of Hormuz defensive moves’</h2>&nbsp;Rubio’s remarks came hours after Iranian and US military forces exchanged strikes near the Strait of Hormuz, but which he labelled “defensive” moves.&nbsp;“What you’re seeing reports of, including last night, is the following: A ship will go through the route, particularly both the northern and southern route of Hormuz,” Rubio said. Those ships come under attack and then the US responds to that attack by shooting down the drones that are trying to sink a commercial civilian vessel illegally and unlawfully, he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-s-central-bank-says-inflation-at-world-war-ii-levels-eco-pain-deepening-for-iranians-1780432873791">Iran’s central bank says inflation at World War II levels; eco pain deepening for Iranians</a>&nbsp;Rubio further said that the Iranians then target some facility in the region.“In order to protect our own forces, we don’t just strike the drones, we strike the people who launch those drones. These are completely defensive in nature, but they are happening in response to an Iranian action; if they don’t shoot at those ships, we don’t shoot, but we have to respond,” the secretary said.&nbsp;<h2>Enriched uranium key issue in Iran talks; no deal yet: Rubio</h2>&nbsp;Rubio also said that the fate of Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpiles is at the centre of talks with Washington, and Tehran has not yet agreed to a peace deal.Washington wants Iran to turn over its near-weapons-grade enriched uranium, agree to curb its nuclear activities and reopen the Strait of Hormuz for any peace agreement to take hold.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mosque-built-illegally-by-pakistanis-in-japan-inaugurated-by-envoy-faces-demolition-1780425871272">Mosque built illegally by Pakistanis in Japan, inaugurated by envoy, faces demolition</a>&nbsp;“I think now, in some of the papers that have been exchanged back and forth, it’s clearly addressed, but we … still don’t have final sign-off from their system as of this morning,” Rubio told the House Foreign Affairs Committee.&nbsp;In the latest escalation, Iranian drones struck Kuwait International Airport, damaging a passenger terminal, killing an Indian national and injuring over 60 others. The attack renewed concerns about the vulnerability of Gulf states that had previously considered themselves insulated from the conflict.

In the latest escalation, Iranian drones struck Kuwait International Airport, damaging a passenger terminal, killing an Indian national and injuring over 60 others. The attack renewed concerns about the vulnerability of Gulf states that had considered themselves insulated.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers during the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Wednesday that the US military’s Iran war operation has ended, and hence, forces are not conducting sustained strikes inside Iran anymore, as Operation Epic Fury had achieved its objectives. Responding to questions from Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., Rubio said, “Epic Fury has concluded.” “We’re no longer conducting sustained strikes inside of Iran to degrade their military because Epic Fury is over,” Rubio said while asserting a US victory. “We define victory as destroying their defence industrial base, significantly reducing the number of missile launchers that they possess, significantly reducing their stockpile of drones,” Rubio said. “And we achieved all those, in addition to destroying what they had left of an air force and wiping out their entire conventional navy,” he added.

In the latest escalation, Iranian drones struck Kuwait International Airport, damaging a passenger terminal, killing an Indian national and injuring over 60 others. The attack renewed concerns about the vulnerability of Gulf states that had considered themselves insulated.

‘No longer conducting sustained strikes in Iran, because Epic Fury is over’: Rubio

A new report claims that nearly 50% of the United States’ THAAD missile defense stockpile was used during “Operation Epic Fury,” raising concerns about overall missile defense readiness and inventory levels. The deployment reportedly played a major role in intercepting incoming aerial threats during the operation, but has also sparked debate over sustainability and replenishment capacity.


Report: 50% US Thaad Stockpile Used in Operation Epic Fury

At a high-stakes Pentagon briefing, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and General Dan Caine accused Iran of repeated aggression, including attacks on ships and forces. While tensions remain high in the Strait of Hormuz, officials said actions are still “below the threshold” of full war. The U.S. stressed defensive operations but warned Iran against further escalation.


Pentagon Briefing On Iran War: US Calls Iran Aggressor Amid Rising War Tensions

Concern over US munitions stockpiles has intensified after heavy use of Tomahawk, Patriot and other missiles in the Iran war. With a fragile ceasefire in place, a clearer picture has emerged: the United States has not run out of missiles, but has come close to testing the limits of its arsenal. Analysis of seven key munitions, conducted by the Centre of Strategic and International Studies, shows sufficient capacity to sustain this war under any plausible scenario. The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.&nbsp;<h2>&nbsp;A War Fought at Unsustainable Intensity</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>In just 39 days of air and missile operations over Iran, the United States expended enormous volumes of high-end munitions. For four of the seven critical munitions analysed, the US may have used more than 50 per cent of its pre-war inventory. This is not marginal depletion, but it is a structural drawdown of core capabilities that underpin modern warfare. CSIS notes: Rebuilding to prewar levels for the seven munitions will take from one to four years as missiles in the pipeline are delivered.&nbsp;Reduced inventories are also likely to constrain US supplies of Patriot, THAAD, and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) to Ukraine and other allies that depend on them. As stockpiles tighten, Washington will increasingly compete with partner nations seeking to rebuild their own arsenals, adding pressure to already stretched production lines. The challenge is further compounded by shifting dynamics among allies, with Japan recently opening the door to expanded arms exports, signalling a more active role in the global defence supply chain and probably intensifying competition for critical munitions and systems.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/f-35-b-21-advanced-drones-trump-s-1-5-trillion-defence-budget-prioritises-750-billion-for-ships-jets-golden-dome-1776786954360">F-35, B-21 &amp; advanced drones: Trump’s $1.5 trillion defence budget prioritises $750 billion for ships, jets and Golden Dome</a>&nbsp;<h2>High-Tempo Strikes Strain High-End Munitions</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>During the conflict, US forces struck over 13,000 targets in just 39 days, reflecting an exceptionally high operational tempo. As Iranian air defences were degraded, operations gradually shifted towards shorter-range, more readily available munitions. However, this transition was only partial. The United States continued to rely on long-range precision missiles for targets beyond reach or heavily defended, sustaining pressure on high-end inventories right up to the ceasefire.&nbsp;Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM)Tomahawk missiles, in service since the 1980s, have seen sustained operational use, but the Iran conflict marked an intense surge. CSIS says, US naval forces fired over 850 TLAMs in the first month, with totals likely exceeding 950 before the ceasefire. The strain is already visible: Japan’s planned delivery of 400 Tomahawks may be delayed, signalling pressure on both US inventories and allied commitments.&nbsp;Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM)More than 1,000 JASSMs were expended in the first month of operations, with an additional ~180 likely used before the ceasefire. Sustained sorties by B-52 bombers from UK bases kept demand high until the end. The scale of use highlights the missile’s central role in long-range strike operations—and the growing stress on high-end precision strike inventories.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-too-old-too-slow-too-expensive-us-air-force-is-keeping-a-10-warthog-until-2030-despite-retirement-calls-why-1776768344552">‘Too old, too slow, too expensive’: US Air Force is keeping A-10 Warthog until 2030 despite retirement calls. Why?</a>&nbsp;Precision Strike Missile (PrSM)The PrSM, still in early deployment, was used extensively against diverse targets, including reportedly maritime assets. One US Army official suggested the “entire inventory” may have been expended, though this remains contested. Even so, the scale of use has sharply reduced availability, likely halting near-term deliveries and exposing the vulnerability of low-volume, next-generation systems.&nbsp;Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)THAAD interceptors, already limited in number, faced intense demand, with over 150 fired during the conflict. The US operates just eight batteries, several redeployed to the Middle East, stretching global coverage. According to the analysis, the production gaps are acute, no new interceptors delivered since August 2023, with supply only expected to resume by April 2027. THAAD relies on scarce AN/TPY-2 radars, with only 13 delivered to date. Their potential loss or damage creates a critical capability gap, making THAAD the most constrained and strategically sensitive system.&nbsp;Patriot (PAC-3 MSE)Patriot systems remain in high global demand, with 18 countries operating them and Ukraine a major user. Around half of annual production is allocated to allies, tightening availability for US needs. While Lockheed Martin plans to raise PAC-3 MSE output to 2,000 annually by 2030 (from 600), near-term supply constraints will force difficult decisions over allocation and prioritisation.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-golden-grip-on-hormuz-why-gulf-fears-us-iran-talks-in-pakistan-risk-handing-tehran-control-of-middle-east-energy-lifeline-1776760786907">‘Golden grip on Hormuz?’ Why gulf fears US–Iran talks in Pakistan risk handing Tehran control of Middle East energy lifeline</a>&nbsp;<h2>The scale of usage</h2>&nbsp;The scale of US munitions use in the Iran conflict is stark against pre-war inventories. According to CSIS analysis, of roughly 3,100 Tomahawks, over 850 were used, while more than 1,000 JASSMs were expended from a stock of 4,400. Limited systems saw sharper strain: 40–70 PrSMs were used from just 90 available. Air defence was heavily taxed, with SM-3 usage (130–250) exceeding its 90-unit inventory, and SM-6 seeing 190–370 used from 410. Defensive systems bore the brunt, with THAAD (190–290 of 360) and Patriot (1,060–1,430 of 2,330) significantly depleted, highlighting the intensity and scale of consumption.&nbsp;

The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.

Concern over US munitions stockpiles has intensified after heavy use of Tomahawk, Patriot and other missiles in the Iran war. With a fragile ceasefire in place, a clearer picture has emerged: the United States has not run out of missiles, but has come close to testing the limits of its arsenal. Analysis of seven key munitions, conducted by the Centre of Strategic and International Studies, shows sufficient capacity to sustain this war under any plausible scenario. The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness. A War Fought at Unsustainable Intensity In just 39 days of air and missile operations over Iran, the United States expended enormous volumes of high-end munitions. For four of the seven critical munitions analysed, the US may have used more than 50 per cent of its pre-war inventory. This is not marginal depletion, but it is a structural drawdown of core capabilities that underpin modern warfare. CSIS notes: Rebuilding to prewar levels for the seven munitions will take from one to four years as missiles in the pipeline are delivered. Reduced inventories are also likely to constrain US supplies of Patriot, THAAD, and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) to Ukraine and other allies that depend on them. As stockpiles tighten, Washington will increasingly compete with partner nations seeking to rebuild their own arsenals, adding pressure to already stretched production lines. The challenge is further compounded by shifting dynamics among allies, with Japan recently opening the door to expanded arms exports, signalling a more active role in the global defence supply chain and probably intensifying competition for critical munitions and systems. ALSO READ: F-35, B-21 & advanced drones: Trump’s $1.5 trillion defence budget prioritises $750 billion for ships, jets and Golden Dome High-Tempo Strikes Strain High-End Munitions During the conflict, US forces struck over 13,000 targets in just 39 days, reflecting an exceptionally high operational tempo. As Iranian air defences were degraded, operations gradually shifted towards shorter-range, more readily available munitions. However, this transition was only partial. The United States continued to rely on long-range precision missiles for targets beyond reach or heavily defended, sustaining pressure on high-end inventories right up to the ceasefire. Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) Tomahawk missiles, in service since the 1980s, have seen sustained operational use, but the Iran conflict marked an intense surge. CSIS says, US naval forces fired over 850 TLAMs in the first month, with totals likely exceeding 950 before the ceasefire. The strain is already visible: Japan’s planned delivery of 400 Tomahawks may be delayed, signalling pressure on both US inventories and allied commitments. Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) More than 1,000 JASSMs were expended in the first month of operations, with an additional ~180 likely used before the ceasefire. Sustained sorties by B-52 bombers from UK bases kept demand high until the end. The scale of use highlights the missile’s central role in long-range strike operations—and the growing stress on high-end precision strike inventories. ALSO READ: ‘Too old, too slow, too expensive’: US Air Force is keeping A-10 Warthog until 2030 despite retirement calls. Why? Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) The PrSM, still in early deployment, was used extensively against diverse targets, including reportedly maritime assets. One US Army official suggested the “entire inventory” may have been expended, though this remains contested. Even so, the scale of use has sharply reduced availability, likely halting near-term deliveries and exposing the vulnerability of low-volume, next-generation systems. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) THAAD interceptors, already limited in number, faced intense demand, with over 150 fired during the conflict. The US operates just eight batteries, several redeployed to the Middle East, stretching global coverage. According to the analysis, the production gaps are acute, no new interceptors delivered since August 2023, with supply only expected to resume by April 2027. THAAD relies on scarce AN/TPY-2 radars, with only 13 delivered to date. Their potential loss or damage creates a critical capability gap, making THAAD the most constrained and strategically sensitive system. Patriot (PAC-3 MSE) Patriot systems remain in high global demand, with 18 countries operating them and Ukraine a major user. Around half of annual production is allocated to allies, tightening availability for US needs. While Lockheed Martin plans to raise PAC-3 MSE output to 2,000 annually by 2030 (from 600), near-term supply constraints will force difficult decisions over allocation and prioritisation. ALSO READ: ‘Golden grip on Hormuz?’ Why gulf fears US–Iran talks in Pakistan risk handing Tehran control of Middle East energy lifeline The scale of usage The scale of US munitions use in the Iran conflict is stark against pre-war inventories. According to CSIS analysis, of roughly 3,100 Tomahawks, over 850 were used, while more than 1,000 JASSMs were expended from a stock of 4,400. Limited systems saw sharper strain: 40–70 PrSMs were used from just 90 available. Air defence was heavily taxed, with SM-3 usage (130–250) exceeding its 90-unit inventory, and SM-6 seeing 190–370 used from 410. Defensive systems bore the brunt, with THAAD (190–290 of 360) and Patriot (1,060–1,430 of 2,330) significantly depleted, highlighting the intensity and scale of consumption.

The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.

US Stockpiles running dry? Heavy use in Iran war pushes THAAD, Patriot and Tomahawk reserves to the brink

The A-10 Thunderbolt II was developed specifically for close air support missions, providing direct assistance to ground forces.

The A-10 Thunderbolt II was developed specifically for close air support missions, providing direct assistance to ground forces.

Why the A-10 Warthog still matters and its role in modern warfare

The Pentagon has formally added Operation Epic Fury to the Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS), marking the first time verified US military casualty figures from this campaign are publicly accessible in the Department of Defense’s official database. The addition comes more than a month after the operation commenced on February 28, 2026, under direct orders from the US President. DCAS now records 13 US service members killed and 365 wounded, with figures distributed across all service branches: Army (247), Navy (63), Marine Corps (19), and Air Force (36).<h2>What DCAS Is and How It Works</h2>&nbsp;DCAS is maintained by the Defense Manpower Data Center and serves as the Department of Defense’s authoritative repository of verified casualty data. It tracks US military personnel who are killed, wounded, missing, or otherwise injured in wars and named operations. The system aggregates reports from the individual services, ensuring that figures released publicly are confirmed and standardised. The database provides detailed breakdowns by conflict, branch, type of casualty, and year, with definitions and explanatory notes available for reference. Historical operations documented in DCAS include Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Inherent Resolve, as well as the Persian Gulf War, Vietnam War, Korean War, and both World Wars.&nbsp;<h2>Significance of Epic Fury’s Inclusion</h2>&nbsp;Adding Epic Fury to DCAS provides a centralised, publicly accessible record of casualties in real time. Pentagon officials note that the database is updated as new verified reports are received, ensuring accuracy. The move aligns Epic Fury with other named operations in the database, allowing analysts, lawmakers, and families to monitor its human cost within a consistent framework. According to official statements, “DCAS is intended to provide transparency and a reliable reference point for understanding the impact of US military operations,” underscoring the importance of maintaining standardised records across conflicts.&nbsp;The casualty list currently includes 10 males and 3 females. Fatalities are almost evenly split between the Army and the Air Force. The US Army has reported 7 deaths, all classified as Hostile, comprising 6 Reservists and 1 Active Duty member. The Air Force has recorded 6 deaths, all classified as Non-Hostile, including 3 Active Duty personnel and 3 National Guard members. No fatalities have been reported for the Navy, Marine Corps, or Space Force to date. This detailed breakdown highlights the varying circumstances of service member losses across branches. The current DCAS entry reflects verified casualties as of April 3, 2026, with figures submitted by the services and compiled centrally. Updates will continue as additional data is confirmed.<h2>What happened in the last 24 hours?</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, the United States and Israel have expanded strikes on Iranian targets, hitting key infrastructure in and around Tehran. Iran says it downed an F-15E Strike Eagle, a claim confirmed by US officials, with one crew member rescued and another missing. The hunt for a missing American pilot believed to be on the run inside hostile territory. Rescue efforts came under fire, with HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopters hit, while A-10 Warthogs were also struck, one crashing into the Gulf and another returning damaged, signalling a sharp escalation.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

DCAS is maintained by the Defense Manpower Data Center and serves as the Department of Defense’s authoritative repository of verified casualty data. It tracks US military personnel who are killed, wounded, missing, or otherwise injured in wars and named operations.

The Pentagon has formally added Operation Epic Fury to the Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS), marking the first time verified US military casualty figures from this campaign are publicly accessible in the Department of Defense’s official database. The addition comes more than a month after the operation commenced on February 28, 2026, under direct orders from the US President. DCAS now records 13 US service members killed and 365 wounded, with figures distributed across all service branches: Army (247), Navy (63), Marine Corps (19), and Air Force (36). What DCAS Is and How It Works DCAS is maintained by the Defense Manpower Data Center and serves as the Department of Defense’s authoritative repository of verified casualty data. It tracks US military personnel who are killed, wounded, missing, or otherwise injured in wars and named operations. The system aggregates reports from the individual services, ensuring that figures released publicly are confirmed and standardised. The database provides detailed breakdowns by conflict, branch, type of casualty, and year, with definitions and explanatory notes available for reference. Historical operations documented in DCAS include Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Inherent Resolve, as well as the Persian Gulf War, Vietnam War, Korean War, and both World Wars. Significance of Epic Fury’s Inclusion Adding Epic Fury to DCAS provides a centralised, publicly accessible record of casualties in real time. Pentagon officials note that the database is updated as new verified reports are received, ensuring accuracy. The move aligns Epic Fury with other named operations in the database, allowing analysts, lawmakers, and families to monitor its human cost within a consistent framework. According to official statements, “DCAS is intended to provide transparency and a reliable reference point for understanding the impact of US military operations,” underscoring the importance of maintaining standardised records across conflicts. The casualty list currently includes 10 males and 3 females. Fatalities are almost evenly split between the Army and the Air Force. The US Army has reported 7 deaths, all classified as Hostile, comprising 6 Reservists and 1 Active Duty member. The Air Force has recorded 6 deaths, all classified as Non-Hostile, including 3 Active Duty personnel and 3 National Guard members. No fatalities have been reported for the Navy, Marine Corps, or Space Force to date. This detailed breakdown highlights the varying circumstances of service member losses across branches. The current DCAS entry reflects verified casualties as of April 3, 2026, with figures submitted by the services and compiled centrally. Updates will continue as additional data is confirmed. What happened in the last 24 hours? Meanwhile, the United States and Israel have expanded strikes on Iranian targets, hitting key infrastructure in and around Tehran. Iran says it downed an F-15E Strike Eagle, a claim confirmed by US officials, with one crew member rescued and another missing. The hunt for a missing American pilot believed to be on the run inside hostile territory. Rescue efforts came under fire, with HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopters hit, while A-10 Warthogs were also struck, one crashing into the Gulf and another returning damaged, signalling a sharp escalation. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

DCAS is maintained by the Defense Manpower Data Center and serves as the Department of Defense’s authoritative repository of verified casualty data. It tracks US military personnel who are killed, wounded, missing, or otherwise injured in wars and named operations.

Pentagon lists Operation Epic Fury losses in casualty database: 13 dead and 365 wounded as Iran war intensifies

Regarded as one of Iran’s tallest structures, the bridge served as a vital transport artery linking Tehran with to the northern regions, carrying both civilian and commercial traffic.

Regarded as one of Iran’s tallest structures, the bridge served as a vital transport artery linking Tehran with to the northern regions, carrying both civilian and commercial traffic.

Tit-for-tat? What are the eight Gulf bridges on Iran’s retaliation list after US blows up Tehran’s largest bridge

The B‑52’s avionics, targeting systems, and weapons bays have been continuously modernised, allowing it to remain compatible with new munitions. 

The B‑52’s avionics, targeting systems, and weapons bays have been continuously modernised, allowing it to remain compatible with new munitions.&nbsp;

'B‑52 bombers fly over Iran': How US’ veteran bomber remains indispensable next to B‑1 and B‑2

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, Joint Chiefs Chairman, declared at a news conference on Tuesday "the upcoming days will be decisive" in the war with Iran. 

"Iran knows that, and there's almost nothing they can militarily do about it," Hegseth claimed. 

Operation Epic Fury: US Secretary of War Briefing on Iran War

Gen. Caine added that US forces have carried out more than 11,000 strikes against targets in Iran, demonstrating the scale of the operation.

Gen. Caine added that US forces have carried out more than 11,000 strikes against targets in Iran, demonstrating the scale of the operation.

'US deploys B‑52 bombers over Iran for first time!' 5 incredible facts that make this 75‑year‑old bomber deadly

The war in Ukraine served as an early warning for Western defence readiness, but the opening 16 days of the Iran conflict have escalated that warning into an urgent alarm about sustainability. The scale at which advanced munitions have been consumed during Operation Epic Fury highlights a serious weakness: the West is operating with a dangerously unfavourable cost-to-effect ratio that its industrial base cannot maintain over time.&nbsp;Although US and Israeli forces have achieved tactical gains by targeting thousands of objectives, they are simultaneously expending extremely costly interceptor missiles to neutralize relatively inexpensive drones and incoming threats. Ukrainian advisors observing the conflict have reportedly been surprised at how freely these high-value defensive systems are being used.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-no-negotiations-have-taken-place-tehran-envoy-to-pakistan-rejects-trump-s-claims-of-us-iran-talks-1774435210631">‘No negotiations have taken place’: Tehran envoy to Pakistan rejects Trump’s claims of US-Iran talks</a>&nbsp;This imbalance is quickly eroding stockpiles of advanced weaponry. Data from the Payne Institute’s tracking tool estimates that coalition forces used over 11,000 munitions in just over two weeks, with a total cost nearing $26 billion.Following an intense initial barrage of more than 5,000 munitions in the first four days, the conflict has transitioned into a prolonged war of attrition. While Iran’s daily attacks have dropped significantly, down 80–90% from peak levels, the ongoing pace remains sufficient to steadily drain coalition resources. Since day five, Iranian forces have averaged roughly 33 missile launches and 94 drone strikes per day.&nbsp;The most pressing concern is not simply the overall volume of munitions used, but the uneven depletion of specific categories. Some supplies remain abundant and replaceable, while others, particularly long-range interceptors and precision-guided weapons, are being exhausted at an alarming rate.&nbsp;This situation reflects longstanding strategic theories. Bertrand Badie’s concept of the “impotence of power” describes how overwhelming military strength does not always translate into political success. Barry Posen’s “Command of the Commons” emphasises US dominance through control of global domains such as air, sea, and space. However, Martin van Creveld warned decades ago that advanced militaries relying on complex, specialized systems are inherently vulnerable when those systems are difficult to replenish.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-iranian-president-praises-erdogan-for-his-stance-on-iran-war-1774441792272/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-iranian-president-praises-erdogan-for-his-stance-on-iran-war-1774441792272/embed</a>&nbsp;These realities point toward a new strategic paradigm: “Command of the Reload.” In modern warfare, where outcomes are shaped by sustained exchanges of missiles and munitions, the decisive advantage belongs to the side that can maintain production, manage resources efficiently, and replenish critical supplies. Operation Epic Fury underscores this shift and serves as an early indicator of what future conflicts may demand.<h3>The Anatomy of Endurance: Supply Constraints and Strategic Strain</h3>The first 16 days of the conflict reveal that the definition of “critical” has evolved into something tangible. A munition becomes critical not because of its size or complexity alone, but because its production depends on limited suppliers, long manufacturing timelines, or scarce components such as rocket motors and advanced electronics. Even small shortages—like specific minerals or battery inputs—can halt production lines, rendering larger stockpiles of raw materials irrelevant.These vulnerabilities are worsened by both policy delays and global disruptions. Despite high-level discussions between government officials and defence contractors, production has not increased due to the absence of firm, funded orders. Companies remain cautious, having previously expanded capacity based on commitments that failed to materialize.The situation is further strained by limited industrial infrastructure. For example, the US relies on a single facility—the Holston Army Ammunition Plant—for high-explosive production, yet no expansion orders have been issued. Meanwhile, geopolitical developments such as the closure of the Strait of Hormuz threaten the supply of key raw materials, compounding the pressure on already fragile production chains.<h2>Munition count for US, Israel, &amp; allies in 2026 Iran War</h2>Courtesy: Royal United Services Institute

<figure class="table"><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1">Country&nbsp;</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1">Purpose&nbsp;</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1">Munition Type&nbsp;</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1">Quantity&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Rampage supersonic missile</td><td>244</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Blue Sparrow air-launched ballistic missile</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Delilah cruise/loitering missile</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Popeye Turbo / Crystal Maze II</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Python/Derby derivatives (SEAD)</td><td>200</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Spice-2000/1000 guided bombs</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Israeli JDAM / smart bomb kits</td><td>551</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>BGM-109 Tomahawk TLAM (Blk IV/V)</td><td>535</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>AGM-158 JASSM / JASSM-ER</td><td>912</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>LRASM (AGM-158C) - U.S. Navy</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>AGM-88 HARM / AARGM-ER</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>ATACMS + PrSM</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>GMLRS / GMLRS-ER (HIMARS)</td><td>365</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Low-cost OWA drones (LUCAS/Scorpion)</td><td>520</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>AGM-114 Hellfire (MQ-9 Reaper)</td><td>378</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>GBU-31/32/38 JDAM (various)</td><td>1080</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>Mk48 Torpedo (US Submarine)</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Offensive</td><td>AGM-154 JSOW</td><td>183</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Patriot PAC-3 (Gulf partners)</td><td>1285</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>THAAD (Partner-operated)</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>A2A — Kuwait (AIM-120/AIM-9)</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>A2A — Jordan (AIM-120/AIM-9)</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>A2A — Qatar/Bahrain/UAE (AIM-120/AIM-9)</td><td>57</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Aster (Qatar Navy) interceptors</td><td>53</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>A2A — RAF Typhoon/F-35 (AIM-120/AIM-9X)</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>A2A — MICA (French Rafale – Gulf intercepts)</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Saudi Patriot (PAC-3/PAC-2 mix)</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>Allied</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Saudi SHORAD / point-defense (Skyguard etc.)</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Arrow 2 / Arrow 3</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Defensive</td><td>David's Sling Stunner</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Iron Dome Tamir</td><td>563</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Defensive</td><td>THAAD (Israel operated)</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>Israel</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Air-to-Air (Python-5/Derby)</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Defensive</td><td>SM-2/SM-3/SM-6 (Navy Aegis)</td><td>431</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Patriot PAC-2/PAC-3 (U.S.)</td><td>402</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Defensive</td><td>THAAD (U.S.-operated)</td><td>198</td></tr><tr><td>US</td><td>Defensive</td><td>Air-to-Air (AIM-120/AIM-9X)</td><td>204</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>

Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

War’s new rule: Cheap drones are beating billion-dollar militaries

The war in Ukraine served as an early warning for Western defence readiness, but the opening 16 days of the Iran conflict have escalated that warning into an urgent alarm about sustainability. The scale at which advanced munitions have been consumed during Operation Epic Fury highlights a serious weakness: the West is operating with a dangerously unfavourable cost-to-effect ratio that its industrial base cannot maintain over time. Although US and Israeli forces have achieved tactical gains by targeting thousands of objectives, they are simultaneously expending extremely costly interceptor missiles to neutralize relatively inexpensive drones and incoming threats. Ukrainian advisors observing the conflict have reportedly been surprised at how freely these high-value defensive systems are being used. Also Read: ‘No negotiations have taken place’: Tehran envoy to Pakistan rejects Trump’s claims of US-Iran talks This imbalance is quickly eroding stockpiles of advanced weaponry. Data from the Payne Institute’s tracking tool estimates that coalition forces used over 11,000 munitions in just over two weeks, with a total cost nearing $26 billion. Following an intense initial barrage of more than 5,000 munitions in the first four days, the conflict has transitioned into a prolonged war of attrition. While Iran’s daily attacks have dropped significantly, down 80–90% from peak levels, the ongoing pace remains sufficient to steadily drain coalition resources. Since day five, Iranian forces have averaged roughly 33 missile launches and 94 drone strikes per day. The most pressing concern is not simply the overall volume of munitions used, but the uneven depletion of specific categories. Some supplies remain abundant and replaceable, while others, particularly long-range interceptors and precision-guided weapons, are being exhausted at an alarming rate. This situation reflects longstanding strategic theories. Bertrand Badie’s concept of the “impotence of power” describes how overwhelming military strength does not always translate into political success. Barry Posen’s “Command of the Commons” emphasises US dominance through control of global domains such as air, sea, and space. However, Martin van Creveld warned decades ago that advanced militaries relying on complex, specialized systems are inherently vulnerable when those systems are difficult to replenish. https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-iranian-president-praises-erdogan-for-his-stance-on-iran-war-1774441792272/embed These realities point toward a new strategic paradigm: “Command of the Reload.” In modern warfare, where outcomes are shaped by sustained exchanges of missiles and munitions, the decisive advantage belongs to the side that can maintain production, manage resources efficiently, and replenish critical supplies. Operation Epic Fury underscores this shift and serves as an early indicator of what future conflicts may demand. The Anatomy of Endurance: Supply Constraints and Strategic Strain The first 16 days of the conflict reveal that the definition of “critical” has evolved into something tangible. A munition becomes critical not because of its size or complexity alone, but because its production depends on limited suppliers, long manufacturing timelines, or scarce components such as rocket motors and advanced electronics. Even small shortages—like specific minerals or battery inputs—can halt production lines, rendering larger stockpiles of raw materials irrelevant. These vulnerabilities are worsened by both policy delays and global disruptions. Despite high-level discussions between government officials and defence contractors, production has not increased due to the absence of firm, funded orders. Companies remain cautious, having previously expanded capacity based on commitments that failed to materialize. The situation is further strained by limited industrial infrastructure. For example, the US relies on a single facility—the Holston Army Ammunition Plant—for high-explosive production, yet no expansion orders have been issued. Meanwhile, geopolitical developments such as the closure of the Strait of Hormuz threaten the supply of key raw materials, compounding the pressure on already fragile production chains. Munition count for US, Israel, & allies in 2026 Iran War Courtesy: Royal United Services Institute

Heavy munition use in the Iran conflict exposes Western supply limits, rising costs, and a new strategic reality driven by sustained production capacity

US forces have struck over 8,000 military targets in Iran during Operation Epic Fury. CENTCOM reports that the strikes grounded Iran's tactical fighters, destroyed 130 vessels, and secured the Strait of Hormuz from coastal missile threats.


US forces have struck over 8,000 military targets in Iran during Operation Epic Fury. CENTCOM reports that the strikes grounded Iran's tactical fighters, destroyed 130 vessels, and secured the Strait of Hormuz from coastal missile threats.

‘8,000 targets hit’: How US carrier strike groups have crippled Iran’s tactical airpower

The A‑10 was originally designed for close air support of ground forces, but in this conflict it is being used over water to hunt fast‑attack boats and mine‑laying vessels.

The A‑10 was originally designed for close air support of ground forces, but in this conflict it is being used over water to hunt fast‑attack boats and mine‑laying vessels.

'30 mm Gatling gun, cluster & GPS bombs': What is A‑10 Warthog that the US is using to hunt Iranian vessels in Strait of Hormuz?

In 20 days of Operation Epic Fury, the US conducted 8,000 combat flights to strike 7,800 targets in Iran. The Pentagon confirmed the sinking of 120 naval vessels, aiming to dismantle Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure.

In 20 days of Operation Epic Fury, the US conducted 8,000 combat flights to strike 7,800 targets in Iran. The Pentagon confirmed the sinking of 120 naval vessels, aiming to dismantle Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure.

‘20 days of US strikes on Iran’: US hits 7,800 targets, sinks 120 ships with 8,000 flights

A U.S. military general has announced that 6,000 Iranian targets have been destroyed amid ongoing operations in the Middle East conflict involving Iran. The statement highlights the scale of U.S. strikes and the intensity of military action in the region.

US-Iran War | Pentagon: 6,000 Iranian Targets Destroyed in Operation Epic Fury

A US military aerial refuelling aircraft involved in operations linked to the conflict with Iran crashed in western Iraq on Thursday (Mar 12), according to several US officials. The aircraft, a Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, went down near the town of Turaibil along the Iraqi-Jordanian border. As per reports, another military plane was forced to declare an emergency and land. Even as one plane crashed and another was forced to make an emergency landing, the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) said in a statement that the crash was not caused by hostile fire or friendly fire. Iran, however, claims that its allied forces downed the aircraft, killing all crew aboard. Here's all we know.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-s-huge-mistake-was-the-north-korean-embassy-in-tehran-hit-by-an-israeli-missile-here-s-the-truth-fact-check-1773298739599">Israel's 'huge mistake' amid Iran war: Did Tel Aviv attack North Korea's embassy in Tehran? Here’s the truth | Fact Check</a><h2>Second tanker damaged but lands safely</h2>Officials said a second KC-135 involved in the incident was damaged but landed safely. According to flight tracking service Flightradar24, one tanker declared an emergency before landing in Tel Aviv later on Thursday. The circumstances of the incident remain under investigation.It is unclear whether the crew of the first aircraft survived the crash. Further details awaited. Recovery operations are currently underway at the crash site. Purported videos of the crashed military plane show an inferno. Watch here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">💥 BREAKING: $65 million. 6 crew. Likely all dead. US CENTCOM confirms KC 135 tanker lost as hostile air defence hit in Iraq. The aircraft was refueling bombers hitting Iran. Now it&#39;s wreckage. Operation Epic Fury just claimed more American lives.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Iran?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Iran</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Isra%C3%ABl?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Israël</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IranWar?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IranWar</a>… <a href="https://t.co/poWV42ABUE">pic.twitter.com/poWV42ABUE</a>&mdash; World conflicts Monitoring Center (@worldbestvideoo) <a href="https://twitter.com/worldbestvideoo/status/2032224013146341663?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>CENTCOM rules out hostile attack</h2>Even as one plane crashed and another was forced to make an emergency landing, CENTCOM on X insisted that the crash was "not due to hostile fire or friendly fire".However, the US Central Command confirmed that the two aircraft were involved in the same incident. "The incident occurred in friendly airspace during Operation Epic Fury, and rescue efforts are ongoing," it said, adding, “One of the aircraft went down in western Iraq, and the second landed safely.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">U.S. Central Command is aware of the loss of a U.S. KC-135 refueling aircraft. The incident occurred in friendly airspace during Operation Epic Fury, and rescue efforts are ongoing. Two aircraft were involved in the incident. One of the aircraft went down in western Iraq, and the…&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2032211125882745265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This marks the fourth publicly acknowledged aircraft to crash during US President Donald Trump's war on Iran. Earlier in the week, the US military confirmed that three F-15E Strike Eagle jets were downed in a friendly fire incident involving forces in Kuwait. All six crew members ejected safely in that case.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

US KC-135 Stratotanker crashes near Iraq-Jordan border during 'Epic Fury' operations; Rescue mission underway

A US military aerial refuelling aircraft involved in operations linked to the conflict with Iran crashed in western Iraq on Thursday (Mar 12), according to several US officials. The aircraft, a Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, went down near the town of Turaibil along the Iraqi-Jordanian border. As per reports, another military plane was forced to declare an emergency and land. Even as one plane crashed and another was forced to make an emergency landing, the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) said in a statement that the crash was not caused by hostile fire or friendly fire. Iran, however, claims that its allied forces downed the aircraft, killing all crew aboard. Here's all we know. Also read | Israel's 'huge mistake' amid Iran war: Did Tel Aviv attack North Korea's embassy in Tehran? Here’s the truth | Fact Check Second tanker damaged but lands safely Officials said a second KC-135 involved in the incident was damaged but landed safely. According to flight tracking service Flightradar24, one tanker declared an emergency before landing in Tel Aviv later on Thursday. The circumstances of the incident remain under investigation. It is unclear whether the crew of the first aircraft survived the crash. Further details awaited. Recovery operations are currently underway at the crash site. Purported videos of the crashed military plane show an inferno. Watch here:

Why did a US military refuelling aircraft crash in Iraq during the Iran war? A Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker went down near the Iraqi-Jordanian border during Operation Epic Fury, and another was forced to make an emergency landing. What exactly happened? Scroll down to find out.

US KC-135 Stratotanker crashes near Iraq-Jordan border during operation Epic Fury; rescue mission underway

US President Donald Trump’s war on Iran, code-named Operation Epic Fury, has turned into a demonstration of how badly he misjudged Iran’s response. It deserves the code-name Operation Epic Miscalculation. The war began on February 28 with a social media posting by Trump issued at 0230 on a Saturday morning, and based on a lie. “Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime.” The dictionary definition of “imminent” is “about to happen at any moment.” Twelve days into what military experts from both sides of the American political divide consider a war of choice, Trump and his aides have yet to explain the nature of the “imminent” threat. Instead, the Trump administration has provided multiple shifting and frequently contradictory explanations for the need to go to war at a time when negotiations were still in progress, and there was no sign of any impending attacks by the repressive theocracy running Iran. The first American air strikes killed Iran’s 86-year-old Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, as well as senior officials, including the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Mohamamed Pakpour. Also killed: close members of Khamenei’s family, including a daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and a grandchild. Khomein’s son Mojtaba Khomenei was named Supreme Leader to succeed his father. Aged 56 and as hard-line anti-American as his father, the son was injured in the attack and has not been seen in public but Iranian state television on Thursday read a statement it said was from him declaring that Iran would keep closed the Strait of Hormuz, the vital waterway which carries around a fifth of the world’s oil, by firing on tankers using it. That Iran, after days of devastating air strikes, the Defence Department said more than 5,000 targets had been hit, would be able to stop traffic through the Straits, looks like a major miscalculation by Trump aides. But it was not the only one. Iran retaliated to the American attacks, carried out in parallel with Israeli strikes, by launching drone and missile strikes on its Gulf neighbours. Although Iranian spokesmen insisted the targets were US military installations, drones, and missiles also hit hotels and airports. That created massive disruptions of global air traffic, stranding millions of passengers because of at least 37,000 flight cancellations. Dubai International Airport, the world’s busiest airport for international passengers, cancelled more than 4,000 flights shortly after the conflict began. A key miscalculation of the effect of devastating strikes and the killing of the Supreme Leader was that “decapitation”, the killing of many of the top leaders, would result in swift government surrender. Trump has repeatedly cited what happened in Venezuela as the perfect way to bend a country to his will. In a stunning display of military skill, US special operations forces captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and his wife Celia from their heavily fortified compound in Caracas. After the pre-dawn raid on January 3, the two were flown to New York to face criminal charges of drug trafficking. The spectacular abduction did not change the government. His Vice President, Delcy Rodriguez, was named interim president. Under her leadership, the Venezuelan government is just as repressive as it was under Maduro, but Rodriguez has made clear she is willing to accede to Washington's demands to open access to Venezuelan oil to US companies. There is no equally compliant Iranian leader in sight. While the Trump administration’s ideas of what comes next in Iran have zigged and zagged, Trump has ruled out any deal with oil-rich Iran and said there must be “unconditional surrender.” That is an odd demand because the phrase implies that officials of the warring sides sign documents to end hostilities. The last time that happened was on September 2, 1945, when Japanese officials signed an “instrument of surrender” which ended the war in the Pacific. The Trump administration sees the US as the sole arbiter of victory. Press spokesman Karoline Leavitt explained that surrender is achieved when Trump determines that Iran is no longer a threat, whether Tehran admits it or not. Domestically, Trump’s war brings him into conflict with millions of Americans who voted for him because he campaigned against his predecessors’ “endless wars” in Iraq and Afghanistan and their military interference elsewhere. Polls show that the majority of Americans disapprove of the war with Iran and are disappointed that Trump’s promise of a Golden Age of lower costs of living has not been fulfilled. It remains to be seen what effect that will have on November’s mid-term elections for the House of Representatives, now controlled by a slim majority of Republicans. It partly depends on whether Trump comes up with a more convincing explanation of the “imminent threat.”&nbsp; It also depends on how resilient the Iranian regime proves to be despite the loss of most of its navy, air defences, missile launchers, and drone factories. &nbsp;An exclusive report by Reuters on Thursday quotes US intelligence reports saying that Iran’s leadership is not at risk of collapse any time soon and retains control of the Iranian public. That contrasts with Trump’s assertion that he will end the biggest military operation since 2003 “soon.” Like “imminent”, “soon” awaits an explanation.

The war on Iran: Epic fury turns into epic miscalculation

US President Donald Trump’s war on Iran, code-named Operation Epic Fury, has turned into a demonstration of how badly he misjudged Iran’s response. It deserves the code-name Operation Epic Miscalculation. The war began on February 28 with a social media posting by Trump issued at 0230 on a Saturday morning, and based on a lie. “Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime.” The dictionary definition of “imminent” is “about to happen at any moment.” Twelve days into what military experts from both sides of the American political divide consider a war of choice, Trump and his aides have yet to explain the nature of the “imminent” threat. Instead, the Trump administration has provided multiple shifting and frequently contradictory explanations for the need to go to war at a time when negotiations were still in progress, and there was no sign of any impending attacks by the repressive theocracy running Iran. The first American air strikes killed Iran’s 86-year-old Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, as well as senior officials, including the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Mohamamed Pakpour. Also killed: close members of Khamenei’s family, including a daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and a grandchild. Khomein’s son Mojtaba Khomenei was named Supreme Leader to succeed his father. Aged 56 and as hard-line anti-American as his father, the son was injured in the attack and has not been seen in public but Iranian state television on Thursday read a statement it said was from him declaring that Iran would keep closed the Strait of Hormuz, the vital waterway which carries around a fifth of the world’s oil, by firing on tankers using it. That Iran, after days of devastating air strikes, the Defence Department said more than 5,000 targets had been hit, would be able to stop traffic through the Straits, looks like a major miscalculation by Trump aides. But it was not the only one. Iran retaliated to the American attacks, carried out in parallel with Israeli strikes, by launching drone and missile strikes on its Gulf neighbours. Although Iranian spokesmen insisted the targets were US military installations, drones, and missiles also hit hotels and airports. That created massive disruptions of global air traffic, stranding millions of passengers because of at least 37,000 flight cancellations. Dubai International Airport, the world’s busiest airport for international passengers, cancelled more than 4,000 flights shortly after the conflict began. A key miscalculation of the effect of devastating strikes and the killing of the Supreme Leader was that “decapitation”, the killing of many of the top leaders, would result in swift government surrender. Trump has repeatedly cited what happened in Venezuela as the perfect way to bend a country to his will. In a stunning display of military skill, US special operations forces captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and his wife Celia from their heavily fortified compound in Caracas. After the pre-dawn raid on January 3, the two were flown to New York to face criminal charges of drug trafficking. The spectacular abduction did not change the government. His Vice President, Delcy Rodriguez, was named interim president. Under her leadership, the Venezuelan government is just as repressive as it was under Maduro, but Rodriguez has made clear she is willing to accede to Washington's demands to open access to Venezuelan oil to US companies. There is no equally compliant Iranian leader in sight. While the Trump administration’s ideas of what comes next in Iran have zigged and zagged, Trump has ruled out any deal with oil-rich Iran and said there must be “unconditional surrender.” That is an odd demand because the phrase implies that officials of the warring sides sign documents to end hostilities. The last time that happened was on September 2, 1945, when Japanese officials signed an “instrument of surrender” which ended the war in the Pacific. The Trump administration sees the US as the sole arbiter of victory. Press spokesman Karoline Leavitt explained that surrender is achieved when Trump determines that Iran is no longer a threat, whether Tehran admits it or not. Domestically, Trump’s war brings him into conflict with millions of Americans who voted for him because he campaigned against his predecessors’ “endless wars” in Iraq and Afghanistan and their military interference elsewhere. Polls show that the majority of Americans disapprove of the war with Iran and are disappointed that Trump’s promise of a Golden Age of lower costs of living has not been fulfilled. It remains to be seen what effect that will have on November’s mid-term elections for the House of Representatives, now controlled by a slim majority of Republicans. It partly depends on whether Trump comes up with a more convincing explanation of the “imminent threat.” It also depends on how resilient the Iranian regime proves to be despite the loss of most of its navy, air defences, missile launchers, and drone factories. An exclusive report by Reuters on Thursday quotes US intelligence reports saying that Iran’s leadership is not at risk of collapse any time soon and retains control of the Iranian public. That contrasts with Trump’s assertion that he will end the biggest military operation since 2003 “soon.” Like “imminent”, “soon” awaits an explanation.

While the Trump administration’s ideas of what comes next in Iran have zigged and zagged, Trump has ruled out any deal with oil-rich Iran and said there must be 'unconditional surrender'

The Pentagon, in a briefing earlier this week, revealed a shocking estimate of what President Donald Trump's war on Iran is costing the United States. According to reports, America spent at least US $11.3 billion over the first week of the war that started on February 28, with the US and Israel launching "pre-emptive" strikes against Iran under Operation Epic Fury and Operation Lion's Roar, respectively. The latest US war spending figure comes after it was reported that the US had spent $5 billion on munitions alone over the first weekend of the war in West Asia.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/dubai-creek-harbour-strike-drone-hits-luxury-residential-building-sparking-major-fire-and-evacuations-amid-iran-war-watch-1773280236925">Dubai Creek Harbour: High-rise ablaze after drone strike amid Iran war — Video</a><h2>Operation Epic Fury cost: $11.3 billion in one week</h2>The 11.3 billion figure, as per an AP News report citing a person familiar with the situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity, was provided to ​lawmakers&nbsp;during a closed-door briefing. Notably, the figure did not include the entire cost of the war, and was only given as US lawmakers clamoured for more information about the conflict that on Thursday (Mar 12) entered its 13th day. Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-nobel-cannibal-khamenei-s-x-account-posts-ghastly-trump-cartoon-after-potus-floats-twisted-tomahawk-theory-on-minab-school-strike-1773194272348">'Nobel Cannibal': Khamenei’s X account posts ghastly Trump cartoon after POTUS floats Tomahawk theory on Iran school strike</a><h2>White House to ask Congress for additional funds for the Iran war?</h2>Citing congressional aides, Reuters reports that the White House is expected to soon submit a request ​to Congress for additional funding for the war. Senior Trump administration officials had previously indicated that a supplemental funding request could be made soon. Some officials have reportedly said the request ​could be for $50 billion, while others have said that estimate seems low. &nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation, and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

How much is Donald Trump’s war on Iran costing the United States?

A Pentagon briefing suggests the US spent $11.3 billion in just the first week of Operation Epic Fury, including billions on munitions alone. What exactly is driving these staggering war costs? Scroll down to find out.

The Pentagon, in a briefing earlier this week, revealed a shocking estimate of what President Donald Trump's war on Iran is costing the United States. According to reports, America spent at least US $11.3 billion over the first week of the war that started on February 28, with the US and Israel launching "pre-emptive" strikes against Iran under Operation Epic Fury and Operation Lion's Roar, respectively. The latest US war spending figure comes after it was reported that the US had spent $5 billion on munitions alone over the first weekend of the war in West Asia. Also read | Dubai Creek Harbour: High-rise ablaze after drone strike amid Iran war — Video Operation Epic Fury cost: $11.3 billion in one week The 11.3 billion figure, as per an AP News report citing a person familiar with the situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity, was provided to lawmakers during a closed-door briefing. Notably, the figure did not include the entire cost of the war, and was only given as US lawmakers clamoured for more information about the conflict that on Thursday (Mar 12) entered its 13th day. Also read | 'Nobel Cannibal': Khamenei’s X account posts ghastly Trump cartoon after POTUS floats Tomahawk theory on Iran school strike White House to ask Congress for additional funds for the Iran war? Citing congressional aides, Reuters reports that the White House is expected to soon submit a request to Congress for additional funding for the war. Senior Trump administration officials had previously indicated that a supplemental funding request could be made soon. Some officials have reportedly said the request could be for $50 billion, while others have said that estimate seems low. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation, and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

How much is Donald Trump’s war on Iran costing the United States?A Pentagon briefing suggests the US spent $11.3 billion in just the first week of Operation Epic Fury, including billions on munitions alone. What exactly is driving these staggering war costs? Scroll down to find out.

THIS is how much Iran war cost US in first week: Pentagon reveals shocking number

As he was addressing the press on Tuesday (March 10), US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said attacks on Iran will ramp up with the heaviest strikes since Washington launched the war 10 days ago. He said, "Today will be yet again our most intense day of strikes inside Iran," Hegseth told a news conference at the Pentagon. While General Dan Caine said, “Ballistic missile attacks continue to trend downwards, 90% from where they started, and one-way attack drones have decreased 83% since the beginning of the operation.”&nbsp;Hegseth noted that today will be “the most intense day of strikes”, this as Iran fired its lowest number of weapons in the past 24 hours.&nbsp;Hegseth asserted, "It would be wise to heed the words of our president not to pursue nuclear weapons”. Taking about the war he said, “This is not endless, this is not protracted,” Hegseth says. “It’s not for me to posit whether it’s the beginning, middle or the end – that’s up to him (President Trump).”

Pete Hegseth warns of the "most intense day" for Operation Epic Fury as US strikes ramp up, while Iranian missile attacks hit a 24-hour record low. Is the tide turning?

As he was addressing the press on Tuesday (March 10), US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said attacks on Iran will ramp up with the heaviest strikes since Washington launched the war 10 days ago. He said, "Today will be yet again our most intense day of strikes inside Iran," Hegseth told a news conference at the Pentagon. While General Dan Caine said, “Ballistic missile attacks continue to trend downwards, 90% from where they started, and one-way attack drones have decreased 83% since the beginning of the operation.” Hegseth noted that today will be “the most intense day of strikes”, this as Iran fired its lowest number of weapons in the past 24 hours. Hegseth asserted, "It would be wise to heed the words of our president not to pursue nuclear weapons”. Taking about the war he said, “This is not endless, this is not protracted,” Hegseth says. “It’s not for me to posit whether it’s the beginning, middle or the end – that’s up to him (President Trump).”

Pete Hegseth warns of the "most intense day" for Operation Epic Fury as US strikes ramp up, while Iranian missile attacks hit a 24-hour record low. Is the tide turning?

Pete Hegseth calls it 'most intense day of strikes' as Iran records lowest attack in 24 hours

Originally developed to replace the ageing Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), the missile offers significantly greater range and operational flexibility.

Originally developed to replace the ageing Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), the missile offers significantly greater range and operational flexibility.

'400+ km range, deadly, all-domain ops': What is PrSM missile & why did US deploy it for the first time in Iran war?

They are particularly effective against fixed targets such as ballistic missile production facilities, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps headquarters and air-defence installations.

They are particularly effective against fixed targets such as ballistic missile production facilities, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps headquarters and air-defence installations.

The cruise missile behind Iran strikes: What made Tomahawk missiles the US’s first-strike weapon in Iran?

US sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln are writing their names on 2,000-pound bombs headed for Iran. This marks the continuation of an ancient military tradition as the US conducts heavy airstrikes during Operation Epic Fury.

US sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln are writing their names on 2,000-pound bombs headed for Iran. This marks the continuation of an ancient military tradition as the US conducts heavy airstrikes during Operation Epic Fury.

'Names on the bombs': Why USS Abraham Lincoln sailors are writing on weapons headed for Iran

Artificial intelligence has sharply accelerated the US military’s ability to identify and strike targets. Integrated into the Pentagon’s Project Maven, AI systems analyse vast intelligence streams from satellites, drones and surveillance feeds.

Artificial intelligence has sharply accelerated the US military’s ability to identify and strike targets. Integrated into the Pentagon’s Project Maven, AI systems analyse vast intelligence streams from satellites, drones and surveillance feeds.

Iran war: How US is crippling Tehran’s arsenal with satellites, AI and cyberattacks

The U.S. Central Command has released a new video documenting the first “100 Hours” of Operation Epic Fury, the joint U.S-Israel military campaign against Iran that has dominated headlines in the Israel-Iran war. The footage, shared on official military social media, highlights precision air and sea strikes on Iranian military infrastructure, fighter jets in action, naval bombardments, and coordinated attacks aimed at degrading Iran’s strike capabilities.


Israel-Iran War: '100 Hours' of Operation Epic Fury; US Central Command Releases Video 

US President Donald Trump could lose a pivotal "race against time" with Iran if America runs out of interceptors first, warned a former top US military commander, even as he postulated that the US-Israel joint strikes on Iran may be because of the POTUS's hubris. Talking to The Times, James Alexander "Sandy" Winnefeld Jr. the former vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said that the high-risk attacks on Tehran could be a "desperation move" ahead of the US midterm elections. Here's what he said.<h2>Trump saving himself from impeachment?</h2>Winnefeld told The Times that Operation Epic Fury could be Trump's attempt to boost his plummeting public approval ratings ahead of the crucial midterm elections. The former US military commander, who happens to be the most senior figure yet to speak out critically about the war, noted that if Trump loses control of Congress in the midterms, it could potentially lead to the POTUS's early ejection from the White House via impeachment.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-race-against-time-can-us-s-patriot-thaad-missiles-outlast-iran-s-shahed-drone-swarms-top-military-commander-warns-1772691101439">Can US' Patriot interceptors outlast Iran’ Shahed drones? Top Cmdr warns...</a>"This could be a bit of a desperation move in order to try to galvanise the American public behind him," he said. "It is entirely possible that if he loses the midterms, he will be a lame duck president, and he won’t be able to accomplish as much as he wants to on his agenda."Winnefeld stated that it was "also a real threat to him personally". He noted that there was "no question" that "there will be new investigations opened up, potentially a long, drawn-out path towards a third impeachment." This, he said, was the "last thing that Donald Trump wants".Calling the ongoing US-Israel war on Iran a "risk," the former US commander said, Trump was "taking risks with inflation if oil prices maintain a high level. He’s taking a chance with his own political base, who actually elected him on a platform of no foreign wars."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/fact-check-is-united-states-using-indian-naval-bases-to-attack-iran-under-operation-epic-fury-1772684291682">Fact-check: Is United States using Indian naval bases to attack Iran?</a><h2>Trump could end the war, but only if...</h2>The former top US military commander said that the US-Israel-Iran war was bound to end sooner rather than later, with a "some kind of a nuclear deal to save face".According to him, one way that might happen is with mediators coming up with a way for Trump to "declare victory before he runs out of ammunition"."One way you could envision this ending is that Oman and Qatar, both of whom are close to the Iranians, step in and negotiate something where Trump is allowed to declare victory before he runs out of ammunition. Iran agrees to not enrich or export anything that it’s already enriched".

Is Donald Trump risking a wider war with Iran to save his political future?

Former US commander Sandy Winnefeld suggests the Iran strikes could be a “desperation move” before midterm elections, warning the US may face a race against time. Scroll down to read more.

US President Donald Trump could lose a pivotal "race against time" with Iran if America runs out of interceptors first, warned a former top US military commander, even as he postulated that the US-Israel joint strikes on Iran may be because of the POTUS's hubris. Talking to The Times, James Alexander "Sandy" Winnefeld Jr. the former vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said that the high-risk attacks on Tehran could be a "desperation move" ahead of the US midterm elections. Here's what he said. Trump saving himself from impeachment? Winnefeld told The Times that Operation Epic Fury could be Trump's attempt to boost his plummeting public approval ratings ahead of the crucial midterm elections. The former US military commander, who happens to be the most senior figure yet to speak out critically about the war, noted that if Trump loses control of Congress in the midterms, it could potentially lead to the POTUS's early ejection from the White House via impeachment. Also read | Can US' Patriot interceptors outlast Iran’ Shahed drones? Top Cmdr warns... "This could be a bit of a desperation move in order to try to galvanise the American public behind him," he said. "It is entirely possible that if he loses the midterms, he will be a lame duck president, and he won’t be able to accomplish as much as he wants to on his agenda." Winnefeld stated that it was "also a real threat to him personally". He noted that there was "no question" that "there will be new investigations opened up, potentially a long, drawn-out path towards a third impeachment." This, he said, was the "last thing that Donald Trump wants". Calling the ongoing US-Israel war on Iran a "risk," the former US commander said, Trump was "taking risks with inflation if oil prices maintain a high level. He’s taking a chance with his own political base, who actually elected him on a platform of no foreign wars." Also read | Fact-check: Is United States using Indian naval bases to attack Iran? Trump could end the war, but only if... The former top US military commander said that the US-Israel-Iran war was bound to end sooner rather than later, with a "some kind of a nuclear deal to save face". According to him, one way that might happen is with mediators coming up with a way for Trump to "declare victory before he runs out of ammunition". "One way you could envision this ending is that Oman and Qatar, both of whom are close to the Iranians, step in and negotiate something where Trump is allowed to declare victory before he runs out of ammunition. Iran agrees to not enrich or export anything that it’s already enriched".

Is Donald Trump risking a wider war with Iran to save his political future?Former US commander Sandy Winnefeld suggests the Iran strikes could be a “desperation move” before midterm elections, warning the US may face a race against time. Scroll down to read more.

Is Operation Epic Fury a 'desperation move' by Trump to win the US midterms? Ex US commander says...

The United States forces marked the 100 hours of Operation Epic Fury against Iran on Thursday (Mar 5), sharing dramatic visuals from the military strikes. Since the operation began on Saturday (Feb 28), the military conflict has spread across the Middle East region. As the fighting continued on the 5th day, Iran launched a fresh wave of missiles at Israel on Thursday, triggering alerts in several areas, including Tel Aviv. Following this, explosions were heard in Tehran as the US and Israeli forces continue their operation against the Islamic regime.Sharing the video, the US Central Command wrote in caption, “‘100 Hours’ of Operation Epic Fury.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">&quot;100 Hours&quot; of Operation Epic Fury. <a href="https://t.co/XW5ZnRAJJL">pic.twitter.com/XW5ZnRAJJL</a>&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2029345177819574525?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The effort to eliminate the Iranian regime&#39;s mobile missile launch capabilities continues. We are finding and destroying these threats with lethal precision. <a href="https://t.co/AkGRYOjnOz">pic.twitter.com/AkGRYOjnOz</a>&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2029412335916376164?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In another post, CENTCOM said that US forces have sunk more than 20 vessels of the Iranian regime vessels with overwhelming firepower from air, land, and sea. It added that US forces have reduced Iranian drone launches by 73 per cent and ballistic missile launches by 86 per cent.CENTCOM also claimed, “While the Iranian regime indiscriminately targets civilians with missiles and drones, US forces continue to aggressively hunt and destroy Iranian missile launchers with precision.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">While the Iranian regime indiscriminately targets civilians with missiles and drones, U.S. forces continue to aggressively hunt and destroy Iranian missile launchers with precision. <a href="https://t.co/1RIhMcg0Jm">pic.twitter.com/1RIhMcg0Jm</a>&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2029240947666551179?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This comes after the US and Israeli military launched strikes on Iran on Saturday (Feb 28), killing Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei and several other top Iranian officials. The operation was named ‘Epic Fury’ by the US and ‘Lion’s Roar’ by Israel. The attacks came amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran and ongoing talks over Iran’s nuclear program. In retaliation, Iran launched attacks on Israel and US military bases in the region, including in Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan.Khamenei’s death was confirmed on March 1, with Iran vowing strong revenge over the killing of its supreme leader and warning that US bases in the region would be treated as American territory. Gulf states have cautioned against further escalation, even as Washington and Tel Aviv signal that operations could continue for weeks.As the conflict escalates, Iran-aligned groups have joined the fight. International leaders have called for de-escalation as some condemned the US-led action, while most NATO allies voiced support for Washington.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

The US marked 100 hours of Operation Epic Fury against Iran, releasing strike visuals as fighting spread across the Middle East. Iran launched missiles at Israel while US-Israeli forces continued attacks on Iranian targets.

The United States forces marked the 100 hours of Operation Epic Fury against Iran on Thursday (Mar 5), sharing dramatic visuals from the military strikes. Since the operation began on Saturday (Feb 28), the military conflict has spread across the Middle East region. As the fighting continued on the 5th day, Iran launched a fresh wave of missiles at Israel on Thursday, triggering alerts in several areas, including Tel Aviv. Following this, explosions were heard in Tehran as the US and Israeli forces continue their operation against the Islamic regime. Sharing the video, the US Central Command wrote in caption, “‘100 Hours’ of Operation Epic Fury.”

The US marked 100 hours of Operation Epic Fury against Iran, releasing strike visuals as fighting spread across the Middle East. Iran launched missiles at Israel while US-Israeli forces continued attacks on Iranian targets.

100 hours of Operation Epic Fury: CENTCOM shares dramatic footage of strikes against Iran – WATCH

As the war in West Asia rages on, US media reports claimed that India has allowed the United States permission to use its naval bases to attack Iran amidst the ongoing Iran-US conflict. Rubbishing the claims, India's Ministry of External Affairs on Wednesday (Mar 4) said that the reports were "baseless and fabricated". Here's all you need to know.<h2>What did the US reports claim?</h2>During an interview with a US-based channel, One America News Network, former US Army Colonel Douglas MacGregor claimed that the US was using Indian ports to launch its attack against Iran under Operation Epic Fury.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-denies-mojtaba-khamenei-named-supreme-leader-tehran-slams-fake-reports-on-succession-1772615770404">Iran denies Mojtaba Khamenei named supreme leader: Tehran slams 'fake' reports on succession</a>"All of our bases have been destroyed. Our harbour installations are destroyed. We are actually having to fall back on India and Indian ports, which is less than ideal; that is what the navy says," Macgregor told One America News Network.However, the MEA in a post on X said that claims about the US using Indian ports were "fake and false". The ministry further cautioned against "such baseless and fabricated comments". Also posting the fact check on the PIBFactCheck page, India reiterated that "This claim is #FAKE".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Fake News Alert! Claims being made on OAN, a US based channel that Indian ports are being used by the US Navy are fake and false. We caution you against such baseless and fabricated comments. <a href="https://t.co/xiFWnkoXBk">pic.twitter.com/xiFWnkoXBk</a>&mdash; MEA FactCheck (@MEAFactCheck) <a href="https://twitter.com/MEAFactCheck/status/2029233689570492805?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Claim: On a US-based channel, One America News Network (<a href="https://twitter.com/OANN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@OANN</a>), former U.S. Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor made a statement suggesting that the United States is using Indian naval bases to attack Iran, amidst the ongoing Iran-US conflict.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PIBFactCheck?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PIBFactCheck</a>: ❌This claim is <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FAKE?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FAKE</a>… <a href="https://t.co/nzcXCi7yT9">pic.twitter.com/nzcXCi7yT9</a>&mdash; PIB Fact Check (@PIBFactCheck) <a href="https://twitter.com/PIBFactCheck/status/2029253516385239101?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-weighs-arming-militias-to-overthrow-iran-regime-wants-somebody-from-within-report-1772599622355">Trump’s 'Operation Epic Fury' targets Tehran: Is a US-backed militia the key to ending the Iran war?</a><h2>US-Israel-Iran war</h2>Thursday (Mar 5) marks the sixth day of the war between the US, Israel, and Iran. The ongoing conflict in West Asia began on February 28 after the US and Israel launched coordinated airstrikes on Iran. On March 1, US President Donald Trump confirmed that the joint operation referred to as Operation Lion’s Roar by Israel, and Operation Epic Fury by Washington, had assassinated Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.India has meanwhile expressed "deep concern" at the conflict in the Middle East, urging all sides to "exercise restraint, avoid escalation, and prioritise the safety of civilians".&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Did India allow the US to use its naval bases to strike Iran? A viral claim by former US colonel Douglas MacGregor suggested American forces were using Indian ports during the Iran conflict. Is there any truth to the claim? Scroll down to read more.

As the war in West Asia rages on, US media reports claimed that India has allowed the United States permission to use its naval bases to attack Iran amidst the ongoing Iran-US conflict. Rubbishing the claims, India's Ministry of External Affairs on Wednesday (Mar 4) said that the reports were "baseless and fabricated". Here's all you need to know. What did the US reports claim? During an interview with a US-based channel, One America News Network, former US Army Colonel Douglas MacGregor claimed that the US was using Indian ports to launch its attack against Iran under Operation Epic Fury. Also read | Iran denies Mojtaba Khamenei named supreme leader: Tehran slams 'fake' reports on succession "All of our bases have been destroyed. Our harbour installations are destroyed. We are actually having to fall back on India and Indian ports, which is less than ideal; that is what the navy says," Macgregor told One America News Network. However, the MEA in a post on X said that claims about the US using Indian ports were "fake and false". The ministry further cautioned against "such baseless and fabricated comments". Also posting the fact check on the PIBFactCheck page, India reiterated that "This claim is #FAKE".

Did India allow the US to use its naval bases to strike Iran? A viral claim by former US colonel Douglas MacGregor suggested American forces were using Indian ports during the Iran conflict. Is there any truth to the claim? Scroll down to read more.

Fact-check: Is United States using Indian naval bases to attack Iran under Operation Epic Fury?

The United States Department of Defense on Wednesday (Mar 4) identified four of the six US Army Reserve soldiers killed in a drone strike in Kuwait earlier this week, as the conflict between Washington, Tel Aviv and Tehran continues to escalate.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-mojtaba-khamenei-iran-elects-new-supreme-leader-to-replace-ayatollah-ali-khamenei-1772587904561">Who is Mojtaba Khamenei? Iran elects new Supreme Leader</a><h2>Who are the four US soldiers killed in Kuwait?</h2>According to a press release by the US Army Reserve, the four fallen soldiers are: Capt. Cody A. Khork, 35, Sgt. 1st Class Noah L. Tietjens, 42, Sgt. 1st Class Nicole M. Amor, 39, and Sgt. Declan J. Coady, 20.The four soldiers were killed on March 1 at a US military site in Port Shuaiba during an unmanned aircraft system attack. "All Soldiers were assigned to the 103rd Sustainment Command, Des Moines, Iowa," reads the statement, adding that the incident remains under investigation.Two other American service members who died during what US officials have called Operation Epic Fury have not yet been publicly identified.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">It is with heavy hearts that we announce the deaths of four U.S. Army Reserve Soldiers supporting Operation Epic Fury on March 1st. “We honor our fallen Heroes, who served fearlessly and selflessly in defense of our nation.” said Lt. Gen. Robert Harter, Chief of Army Reserve. <a href="https://t.co/r4zBm3hfyt">pic.twitter.com/r4zBm3hfyt</a>&mdash; U.S. Army Reserve (@USArmyReserve) <a href="https://twitter.com/USArmyReserve/status/2029010189928603974?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Capt. Cody A. Khork</h2><figure class="image"><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HCh9T_hXwAAPUKb?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" alt="Capt. Cody Khork"></figure>According to the press release, Khork, a resident of Lakeland, Florida had served in uniform for more than a decade. He enlisted in the National Guard in 2009 and was commissioned as a Military Police Officer in the Army Reserve in 2014. He was deployed to Saudia Arabia in 2018, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in 2021, and Poland in 2024.His awards and decorations include the Meritorious Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Joint Service Achievement Medal, Army Superior Unit Award, Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, Armed Forces Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Army Reserve Component Overseas Training Ribbon, Armed Forces Reserve Medal with 10 Year Device and “M” Device, and the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/watch-drone-hits-near-us-consulate-in-dubai-no-injuries-reported-1772571823266">WATCH | Drone hits near US consulate in Dubai, no injuries reported</a><h2>Sgt. 1st Class Noah L. Tietjens</h2><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HCh9yEuXoAEAWED?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" alt="Sgt 1st Class Noah Teitjans"> Noah L. Tietjens, a resident of Bellevue, Nebraska, joined the Army Reserve in 2006 as a wheeled vehicle mechanic. Over the years, he earned several honours, including the Meritorious Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal with Campaign Star, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, and the Armed Forces Reserve Medal With “M” Device.<h2>Sgt. 1st Class Nicole M. Amor</h2><figure class="image"><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HCh9jLzXoAAWQOY?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" alt="Sgt 1st Class Nicole Amor"></figure>Sgt. 1st Class Nicole M. Amor, a resident of White Bear Lake, Minnesota, began her military in 2005 when she enlisted in the National Guard as an automated logistics specialist. A year later she transferred to the Army Reserve. She deployed to Kuwait and Iraq in 2019 and also received the Army Commendation Medal along with several other awards.Over the years, she earned several honours, including the Army Commendation Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Service Medal, NCO Professional Development Ribbon, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, and the Armed Forces Reserve Medal with “M” Device.&nbsp;<h2>Sgt. Declan J. Coady</h2><figure class="image"><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HCh-BAKXwAApkyK?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" alt="Sgt Declan Coady"></figure>Coady was the youngest among the four. He enlisted in the Army Reserve in 2023 as an information technology specialist. After his death, he was posthumously promoted from specialist. His decorations include the Army Service Ribbon, National Defense Service Ribbon and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

Who are the US soldiers killed in the Kuwait drone strike? The Pentagon has identified four Army Reserve troops who died in the attack as tensions with Iran escalate.

Who were they and where were they stationed? Scroll down to read more.

The United States Department of Defense on Wednesday (Mar 4) identified four of the six US Army Reserve soldiers killed in a drone strike in Kuwait earlier this week, as the conflict between Washington, Tel Aviv and Tehran continues to escalate. Also read | Who is Mojtaba Khamenei? Iran elects new Supreme Leader Who are the four US soldiers killed in Kuwait? According to a press release by the US Army Reserve, the four fallen soldiers are: Capt. Cody A. Khork, 35, Sgt. 1st Class Noah L. Tietjens, 42, Sgt. 1st Class Nicole M. Amor, 39, and Sgt. Declan J. Coady, 20. The four soldiers were killed on March 1 at a US military site in Port Shuaiba during an unmanned aircraft system attack. "All Soldiers were assigned to the 103rd Sustainment Command, Des Moines, Iowa," reads the statement, adding that the incident remains under investigation. Two other American service members who died during what US officials have called Operation Epic Fury have not yet been publicly identified.

Who are the US soldiers killed in the Kuwait drone strike? The Pentagon has identified four Army Reserve troops who died in the attack as tensions with Iran escalate.Who were they and where were they stationed? Scroll down to read more.

Pentagon identifies four soldiers killed in Kuwait attack: All we know about them

operation-epic-fury

Operation Epic Fury, News on Operation Epic Fury, stories on Operation Epic Fury, articles on Operation Epic Fury, Operation Epic Fury stories at Wion, Operation Epic Fury news, Operation Epic Fury latest news

operation epic-fury

Pentagon Faces Backlash Over US Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Under Fire

Pentagon Under Fire Over Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Faces Backlash

Pentagon Confirms Grok Helped Support Operation Epic Fury Against Iran

No longer conducting sustained strikes in Iran, because Epic Fury is over: Rubio

Report: 50% US Thaad Stockpile Used in Operation Epic Fury

Pentagon Briefing On Iran War: US Calls Iran Aggressor Amid Rising War Tensions

Heavy use in Iran war pushes US THAAD, Patriot & Tomahawk reserves to the brink

Why the A-10 Warthog still matters and its role in modern warfare

US casualties mount in Iran War: 13 Dead, 365 wounded as Pentagon releases data

What are the 8 Gulf bridges Iran may target after US B1 bridge strike?

'B‑52 bombers fly over Iran': How US’ veteran bomber remains relevant

Operation Epic Fury: US Secretary of War Briefing on Iran War

US deploys B‑52 over Iran for first time: 5 Things to know about these bombers

War’s new rule: Cheap drones are beating billion-dollar militaries

‘Navy no longer sailing’: How the US military has neutralised Iran’s airpower

What is A‑10 Warthog that US is using to hunt Iranian vessels in Hormuz Strait?

‘US vs Iran war’: 8,000 combat flights and 120 ships sunk in 20 days

US-Iran War | Pentagon: 6,000 Iranian Targets Destroyed in Operation Epic Fury

US military plane crashes near Iraq-Jordan border during operation Epic Fury

The war on Iran: Epic fury turns into epic miscalculation

THIS is how much Iran war cost US in 1st week: Pentagon reveals shocking number

'This is not endless...' Pete Hegseth calls it the most intense day of strikes

What is PrSM missile and why did US deploy it for the first time in Iran war?

Why Tomahawk cruise missiles became the US’s first-strike weapon in Iran

Why USS Abraham Lincoln sailors are writing on weapons headed for Iran

How US is crippling Iran’s arsenal with satellites, AI and cyberattacks