The central claim behind the Iran conflict is now under serious scrutiny. Top US intelligence testimony suggests Tehran posed no active nuclear threat even as war rhetoric intensified. With insiders silenced and contradictions emerging, is this a case of shifting goalposts? Or a deeper strategic play? Tonight, we ask the tough questions.


US-Iran War: Gabbard's Revelation Undercuts Trump & Bibi's War Objective

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu hinted that a ground operation would be needed in Iran to overthrow the Masoud Pezeshkian-led government. This has sparked speculation about a possible move by U.S. and Israel to deploy troops in Iran to secure enriched uranium as well as seize the strategic Kharg island.


US-Iran War: Will U.S. & Israel Deploy Troops in Iran? 

The United States has launched a major military blitz to secure and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, deploying over 8,000 service members amid escalating tensions in the US-Iran war. The strategic waterway, a critical artery for global oil shipments, has faced repeated disruptions due to missile threats, drone attacks, and naval confrontations.


US Launches Blitz to Reopen Hormuz Strait |8,000 Service Members Deployed

US President Donald Trump is facing growing strain in relations with key allies as the Iran war widens, with several nations reluctant to join military efforts and instead pushing for de-escalation. Reports indicate frustration in Washington over limited international backing, even as the conflict disrupts global energy markets and security dynamics.


Trump's Iran War Frays Ties With Allies, as Conflict Widens Trump Searches for an Endgame

At the Commander-in-Chief Trophy presentation at the White House, US President Donald Trump on Friday (March 20) said the United States is ‘doing extremely well in Iran’. He claimed Iran has ‘no navy anymore’ and that 58 ships were ‘knocked down’ in just two days, while emphasizing that the US has the ‘greatest navy anywhere in the world’. “We're doing really well,” he said, adding that the US will not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons because 'if they had them, they'd use them'.&nbsp;Trump went on to list Iran’s military assets, including its navy, air force, anti-aircraft systems, radar, and leadership, saying ‘they are all gone’. "Now nobody wants to be a leader over there anymore," he added. “We want to talk to them, but we have nobody to talk to.” "We like it that way," he said. He also asserted that Iran aimed to dominate the Middle East, repeating that ‘if they had a nuclear weapon, they would have used it’. The US had to intervene, he said, and it "should have been done long ago'.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-labels-nato-a-paper-tiger-calls-allies-cowards-over-iran-war-1774017972734">Trump labels NATO a ‘Paper Tiger,’ calls allies ‘Cowards’ over Iran war</a>&nbsp;Donald Trump was presenting the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy to the Navy Midshipmen football team during the ceremony at the White House on Friday afternoon. The trophy is awarded each year to the winner of the college football series between the Army, Navy, and Air Force academies. In December 2025, the US Navy claimed its second straight title with a narrow 17–16 victory over the Army on December 13, 2025. Trump attended that championship game alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, Navy Secretary John Phelan, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

'Nobody wants to be leader of Iran', says Trump; praises US military strength

At the Commander-in-Chief Trophy presentation at the White House, US President Donald Trump on Friday (March 20) said the United States is ‘doing extremely well in Iran’. He claimed Iran has ‘no navy anymore’ and that 58 ships were ‘knocked down’ in just two days, while emphasizing that the US has the ‘greatest navy anywhere in the world’. “We're doing really well,” he said, adding that the US will not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons because 'if they had them, they'd use them'. Trump went on to list Iran’s military assets, including its navy, air force, anti-aircraft systems, radar, and leadership, saying ‘they are all gone’. "Now nobody wants to be a leader over there anymore," he added. “We want to talk to them, but we have nobody to talk to.” "We like it that way," he said. He also asserted that Iran aimed to dominate the Middle East, repeating that ‘if they had a nuclear weapon, they would have used it’. The US had to intervene, he said, and it "should have been done long ago'. Also Read: Trump labels NATO a ‘Paper Tiger,’ calls allies ‘Cowards’ over Iran war Donald Trump was presenting the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy to the Navy Midshipmen football team during the ceremony at the White House on Friday afternoon. The trophy is awarded each year to the winner of the college football series between the Army, Navy, and Air Force academies. In December 2025, the US Navy claimed its second straight title with a narrow 17–16 victory over the Army on December 13, 2025. Trump attended that championship game alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, Navy Secretary John Phelan, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US President Donald Trump says that America is ‘doing extremely well in Iran’, claims major military losses, and vows Iran won’t get nuclear weapons

US President Donald Trump is facing mounting criticism over his handling of the escalating US-Iran war, with global leaders and analysts questioning both the strategy and its consequences. Key allies have expressed reluctance to fully back Washington’s military campaign, with some NATO members urging de-escalation instead of deeper involvement. 


US-Iran War: Trump's War in West Asia Invites Criticism

As the US‑Iran war continues, President Donald Trump is navigating a fraught strategic balancing act between military pressure on Iran and volatile global oil markets. Trump has directed precision strikes on Iranian military infrastructure while sparing core oil facilities to avoid exacerbating price spikes. 


US-Iran War: Donald Trump Balances War Strategy with Oil Market Risks

Denmark reportedly prepared for a possible attack from the United States in January by sending bags of blood to Greenland and deploying explosives to disable runways in case of a battle with its former closest ally. Amid rising tensions after Donald Trump threatened to take control of Greenland “the hard way,” Danish authorities were alarmed enough to begin contingency planning for a potential invasion, according to Danish public broadcaster DR. When Danish troops were sent to Greenland, they were reportedly equipped with explosives to destroy key airstrips in Nuuk and in Kangerlussuaq, a small town north of the capital, to prevent US aircraft from landing in case of an attack. They also transported blood from Danish blood banks to treat casualties during the war, based on information from multiple government and intelligence sources. At the same time, Copenhagen quietly sought diplomatic backing from European allies through a series of confidential discussions that began shortly after the 2024 US election. Sources indicated that the US attack on Venezuela on 3 January was a crucial turning point. After Trump announced to capture Greenland, adding that the US needed Greenland “very badly”, it renewed fears in Denmark.<h3>What does the US attack mean?</h3>The next day, Mette Frederiksen warned that any attack by the United States on a NATO member would effectively signal the collapse of both the alliance and the post-Second World War security framework. According to Danish broadcaster DR, plans were already in place to deploy Danish and European troops to Greenland later in the year. Still, these were significantly accelerated due to rising tensions. An unnamed top French authority stated that the unprecedented situation had brought Europe closer together. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realised once and for all that we need to be able to take care of our own security,” the source said. While Copenhagen sought to avoid escalating tensions with the United States, it was also unwilling to remain passive in the face of a potential attack. An advance unit comprising Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish troops arrived in Greenland, followed by a larger deployment that included elite forces. Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were also dispatched toward the North Atlantic region. &nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/chinese-scientists-have-supposedly-found-a-flaw-in-the-b-21-raider-bomber-1773925835054">Chinese scientists have supposedly found a flaw in US' B-21 Raider Bomber</a>

When Danish troops were sent to Greenland, they were reportedly equipped with explosives to destroy key airstrips in Nuuk and in Kangerlussuaq, a small town north of the capital, to prevent US aircraft from landing in case of an attack.

Denmark reportedly prepared for a possible attack from the United States in January by sending bags of blood to Greenland and deploying explosives to disable runways in case of a battle with its former closest ally. Amid rising tensions after Donald Trump threatened to take control of Greenland “the hard way,” Danish authorities were alarmed enough to begin contingency planning for a potential invasion, according to Danish public broadcaster DR. When Danish troops were sent to Greenland, they were reportedly equipped with explosives to destroy key airstrips in Nuuk and in Kangerlussuaq, a small town north of the capital, to prevent US aircraft from landing in case of an attack. They also transported blood from Danish blood banks to treat casualties during the war, based on information from multiple government and intelligence sources. At the same time, Copenhagen quietly sought diplomatic backing from European allies through a series of confidential discussions that began shortly after the 2024 US election. Sources indicated that the US attack on Venezuela on 3 January was a crucial turning point. After Trump announced to capture Greenland, adding that the US needed Greenland “very badly”, it renewed fears in Denmark. What does the US attack mean? The next day, Mette Frederiksen warned that any attack by the United States on a NATO member would effectively signal the collapse of both the alliance and the post-Second World War security framework. According to Danish broadcaster DR, plans were already in place to deploy Danish and European troops to Greenland later in the year. Still, these were significantly accelerated due to rising tensions. An unnamed top French authority stated that the unprecedented situation had brought Europe closer together. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realised once and for all that we need to be able to take care of our own security,” the source said. While Copenhagen sought to avoid escalating tensions with the United States, it was also unwilling to remain passive in the face of a potential attack. An advance unit comprising Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish troops arrived in Greenland, followed by a larger deployment that included elite forces. Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were also dispatched toward the North Atlantic region. Also read: Chinese scientists have supposedly found a flaw in US' B-21 Raider Bomber

When Danish troops were sent to Greenland, they were reportedly equipped with explosives to destroy key airstrips in Nuuk and in Kangerlussuaq, a small town north of the capital, to prevent US aircraft from landing in case of an attack.

Blood, bombs & more: Denmark prepared for potential US strike in Greenland-Report

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities are being heavily degraded, even as questions grow over the true scale of damage. He praised close coordination with US President Donald Trump but denied claims that Israel pulled Washington into the conflict. Netanyahu also confirmed Israel acted alone in striking Iran’s South Pars gas field, while acknowledging that Trump urged restraint on further energy strikes.


US-Iran War: Israel Admits Trump Asked to Hold Further Strikes on Gas Fields

US-Israel at war with Iran: US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard told lawmakers that Donald Trump’s focus remains on dismantling Iran’s missile and naval strength, while Israel is prioritising a direct hit on the country’s leadership. The divergence could reshape how the conflict unfolds in the coming days.


US-Iran War | Tulsi Gabbard: Israel Focused on Disabling Iran's Laedership

The U.S. Director of National Intelligence has revealed that President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu do not share the same goals in the Iran war. Washington is focused on dismantling Iran’s missile and naval capabilities, while Israel prioritizes targeting Iranian leadership - highlighting a strategic rift between the allies.


US-Iran War: Did Israel Push US Into War With Iran?

The United States and Japan have announced a major energy partnership, agreeing to invest $40 billion in building next-generation nuclear reactors across the American South. The plan was confirmed on Thursday (Mat 19) after talks in Washington between US President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. At the centre of the deal are small modular reactors, or SMRs, to be developed in Tennessee and Alabama. The technology is being pitched as a more flexible, scalable alternative to traditional nuclear plants. This comes as Tokyo last year agreed to invest $550 billion through 2029 under a new trade pact with Washington.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-a-moment-of-silence-for-the-0-07-internet-reacts-as-kim-jong-un-s-perfect-election-marred-by-rare-dissent-north-korea-1773819815156">'A moment of silence for the 0.07%': Internet reacts as Kim Jong Un’s ‘perfect’ election marred by rare dissent</a><h2>What the projects involve</h2>The so-called small modular reactors (SMRs) will be built with support from GE Vernova Hitachi, which has been working on SMR technology for years. In simple terms, these are smaller, factory-built reactors that can be deployed faster and at lower cost. Alongside the nuclear investment, both countries also announced $33 billion for natural gas power facilities in Pennsylvania and Texas.<h2>Next-gen stable power</h2>A joint statement by the two nations said that the SMRs would serve as "a tremendous next-generation stable power source, stabilising electricity prices for the American people and strengthening the Japan-US leadership in global technological competition."These projects are part of a broader investment framework agreed last year, under which Tokyo committed up to $550 billion in investment in the US economy through 2029. The first set of projects under that framework was rolled out earlier this year in February, a $36 billion in commitments in three infrastructure projects. According to Thursday's announcement, the projects would ensure security by "accelerating economic growth of both countries, thereby paving the way for a New Golden Age of the ever-growing Japan-US Alliance."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-divorce-paper-bloodshed-woman-kills-self-after-shooting-husband-at-us-military-base-in-new-mexico-holloman-air-force-base-shoppette-1773802929441">‘Divorce paper’ bloodshed: Woman commits suicide after shooting husband at US' Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico</a><h2>Focus on critical minerals</h2>The two countries also released a separate action plan targeting supply chains for critical minerals, an area where China currently dominates. The plan includes exploring coordinated trade policies and mechanisms, such as border-adjusted price floors, "focusing in the first instance on select critical minerals."

The US and Japan have announced a $40 billion partnership to build next-generation nuclear reactors, specifically small modular reactors (SMRs), in Tennessee and Alabama. The deal was finalised after talks between Donald Trump and Sanae Takaichi

The United States and Japan have announced a major energy partnership, agreeing to invest $40 billion in building next-generation nuclear reactors across the American South. The plan was confirmed on Thursday (Mat 19) after talks in Washington between US President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. At the centre of the deal are small modular reactors, or SMRs, to be developed in Tennessee and Alabama. The technology is being pitched as a more flexible, scalable alternative to traditional nuclear plants. This comes as Tokyo last year agreed to invest $550 billion through 2029 under a new trade pact with Washington. Also read | 'A moment of silence for the 0.07%': Internet reacts as Kim Jong Un’s ‘perfect’ election marred by rare dissent What the projects involve The so-called small modular reactors (SMRs) will be built with support from GE Vernova Hitachi, which has been working on SMR technology for years. In simple terms, these are smaller, factory-built reactors that can be deployed faster and at lower cost. Alongside the nuclear investment, both countries also announced $33 billion for natural gas power facilities in Pennsylvania and Texas. Next-gen stable power A joint statement by the two nations said that the SMRs would serve as "a tremendous next-generation stable power source, stabilising electricity prices for the American people and strengthening the Japan-US leadership in global technological competition." These projects are part of a broader investment framework agreed last year, under which Tokyo committed up to $550 billion in investment in the US economy through 2029. The first set of projects under that framework was rolled out earlier this year in February, a $36 billion in commitments in three infrastructure projects. According to Thursday's announcement, the projects would ensure security by "accelerating economic growth of both countries, thereby paving the way for a New Golden Age of the ever-growing Japan-US Alliance." Also read | ‘Divorce paper’ bloodshed: Woman commits suicide after shooting husband at US' Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico Focus on critical minerals The two countries also released a separate action plan targeting supply chains for critical minerals, an area where China currently dominates. The plan includes exploring coordinated trade policies and mechanisms, such as border-adjusted price floors, "focusing in the first instance on select critical minerals."

The US and Japan have announced a $40 billion partnership to build next-generation nuclear reactors, specifically small modular reactors (SMRs), in Tennessee and Alabama. The deal was finalised after talks between Donald Trump and Sanae Takaichi.

US, Japan unveil nuclear deal, bet $40B on small modular reactors in next gen energy push after Trump-Takaichi meet

US President Donald Trump hosted Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi at the White House’s Oval Office, reaffirming the enduring US–Japan alliance and discussing shared global priorities. The meeting comes amid heightened geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing US–Iran war, and covered cooperation on security, economic ties, and regional stability.


US President Donald Trump Meets Japanese Counterpart Sanae Takaichi at Oval Office 

The US Federal Reserve’s latest dot plot signals just one rate cut ahead, defying calls from Donald Trump for an immediate and aggressive reduction. The cautious stance reflects the Fed’s ongoing concerns over inflation and economic stability, even as political pressure mounts.

Markets reacted to the outlook with mixed signals, as investors recalibrate expectations around interest rates, borrowing costs, and economic growth. The decision underscores the central bank’s commitment to data-driven policy amid uncertainty in the US and global economy.


US Central Banks Dot Plot Unfolds One Cut, Fed Defies Trump's Call for an Immediate Rate Cut Again

The US-Iran war continues to escalate as Donald Trump makes a crucial statement on the unfolding crisis. Trump said Israel will not carry out further strikes on Iran’s South Pars gas field, while warning Tehran against targeting Qatar.


US-Iran War | Trump: Israel Won't Hit South Pars, Iran Must Not Target Qatar

A new document, which was earlier redacted, was unveiled by Democrat Senator Dan Goldman on the House Floor. The document has explicit mentions that directly contradict Trump's claim that he threw out Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for poaching his employees. The document is an October 2009 conversation between Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger and Trump's attorney, Alan Garten. In the unredacted version presented by Democratic Senator Dan Goldman on the House floor, Goldberger wrote that Garten said Epstein was never asked to leave Trump's Florida club, as he was a guest, not a member.&nbsp;Goldman accused Attorney General Pam Bondi of deliberately covering up information; he claimed that if this was covered up and later revealed to Congress, then what else was covered up. Goldman highlighted that the DOJ is refusing to disclose more than 3 million documents.&nbsp;“Now, why is this important? Because if the attorney general is covering up this information that she then reveals to Congress, what else is she covering up about Donald Trump’s involvement in the Epstein files?” said Goldman. This is one of many lies Trump has said related to Epstein; he earlier denied that he ever travelled in Jeffrey Epstein's private plane. But the flight log reveals that Trump travelled on the flight at least 8 times.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/epstein-files-fbi-memo-donald-trump-allegation-1773141245781">FBI memo claims Epstein abused a minor while speaking to Trump on speaker phone</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">WATCH: Today, I went to the House floor and revealed previously redacted files that should have never been redacted. The unredacted portion showed that Donald Trump has repeatedly lied about his knowledge of and involvement in Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. If they are… <a href="https://t.co/50D5WUHOtI">pic.twitter.com/50D5WUHOtI</a>&mdash; Rep. Dan Goldman (@RepDanGoldman) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepDanGoldman/status/2034396183053976017?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

A third batch of files was released in early March, 40,000- 50,000 new files, after the newspaper Wall Street Journal (WSJ) said that they were missing from the second batch. According to the DOJ, it was withheld for further review and redaction following the initial massive release of over 3 million pages in January 2026. This batch had interviews where the victim discussed being abused by Trump when she was a minor.The Trump administration has denied all these claims as "baseless' and called the women mentally disturbed. Attorney General Pam Bondi is already under fire for cover up of the Epstein Files. The Republican-led House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed for a deposition in April.

Dan Goldman reveals an unredacted Epstein document contradicting Trump’s Mar-a-Lago claim, as Pam Bondi faces cover-up allegations.

A new document, which was earlier redacted, was unveiled by Democrat Senator Dan Goldman on the House Floor. The document has explicit mentions that directly contradict Trump's claim that he threw out Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for poaching his employees. The document is an October 2009 conversation between Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger and Trump's attorney, Alan Garten. In the unredacted version presented by Democratic Senator Dan Goldman on the House floor, Goldberger wrote that Garten said Epstein was never asked to leave Trump's Florida club, as he was a guest, not a member. Goldman accused Attorney General Pam Bondi of deliberately covering up information; he claimed that if this was covered up and later revealed to Congress, then what else was covered up. Goldman highlighted that the DOJ is refusing to disclose more than 3 million documents. “Now, why is this important? Because if the attorney general is covering up this information that she then reveals to Congress, what else is she covering up about Donald Trump’s involvement in the Epstein files?” said Goldman. This is one of many lies Trump has said related to Epstein; he earlier denied that he ever travelled in Jeffrey Epstein's private plane. But the flight log reveals that Trump travelled on the flight at least 8 times. Also Read: FBI memo claims Epstein abused a minor while speaking to Trump on speaker phone

Dan Goldman reveals an unredacted Epstein document contradicting Trump’s Mar-a-Lago claim, as Pam Bondi faces cover-up allegations.

Dan Goldman unveils previously redacted Epstein document contradicting Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago claim

US President Donald Trump is not in a good mood, at least his Truth Social post on Wednesday (Mar 18) hints so. The US president has reacted after Israel carried out a strike on the South Pars Gas Field. Distancing America from the attack, Trump said that the US knew nothing about it. A seemingly angry Trump lashed out at Iran for attacking LNG facilities in Qatar as part of retaliation against South Pars Gas Field strike. While he declared that Israel will not carry out attacks on South Pars Field, he defended Qatar using expressions he has rarely used for any other nation. “The country of Qatar was in no way, shape, or form, involved with it, nor did it have any idea that it was going to happen.” He then issued a stern warning of blowing up the entire South Pars Gas Field if Qatar is attacked by Iran again. He said that he would do so “with or without the help of Israel” and added that he would not want to authorise such level of violent act because of the long term implications. Ahead of Trump's post, an Associated Press report stated that Israel carried out a strike on South Pars gas field in the Pesian Gulf even after Washington backed out of the plan.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-iran-political-structure-strong-araghchi-responds-after-larijani-s-killing-irgc-launches-khorramshahr-kheibar-shekan-missiles-on-israel-1773797546308">'Political structure strong': Araghchi responds after Larijani's killing; IRGC launches Khorramshahr, Kheibar Shekan missiles</a>

“Israel, out of anger for what has taken place in the Middle East, has violently lashed out at a major facility known as South Pars Gas Field in Iran. A relatively small section of the whole has been hit. The United States knew nothing about this particular attack, and the country of Qatar was in no way, shape, or form, involved with it, nor did it have any idea that it was going to happen. NO MORE ATTACKS WILL BE MADE BY ISRAEL pertaining to this extremely important and valuable South Pars Field,” Trump wrote in Truth Social post.&nbsp;Trump's Truth Social post is a hint that he might be frustrated with Israeli offensive in the war that has now entered Day 20. While he has been slamming Iran for attack on neighbouring Gulf nations, specially Qatar and UAE, his statements about Israel is being seen as a warning and also a &nbsp;hint that Benjamin Netanyahu-led country might be at its own now that the war has started.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/from-four-weeks-to-war-is-very-complete-to-not-won-enough-trump-contradicts-himself-about-endgame-of-iran-war-khamenei-dead-netanyahu-israel-1773117026231">From 'four weeks' to 'war is very complete' to 'not won enough': Trump contradicts himself on endgame of Iran war</a>&nbsp;He then lashed out at Iran saying “Unfortunately, Iran did not know this, or any of the pertinent facts pertaining to the South Pars attack, and unjustifiably and unfairly attacked a portion of Qatar’s LNG Gas facility” He then said that US would blow up &nbsp;South Pars Gas Field if “Iran unwisely decides to attack a very innocent, in this case, Qatar - In which instance the United States of America, with or without the help or consent of Israel, will massively blow up the entirety of the South Pars Gas Field at an amount of strength and power that Iran has never seen or witnessed before. I do not want to authorize this level of violence and destruction because of the long term implications that it will have on the future of Iran, but if Qatar’s LNG is again attacked, I will not hesitate to do so.”&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

US President Donald Trump distanced America from Israel’s strike on South Pars Gas Field and criticised Iran for hitting Qatar’s LNG sites. He warned of massive retaliation if Qatar is attacked again, while signalling frustration with Israel’s actions.

US President Donald Trump is not in a good mood, at least his Truth Social post on Wednesday (Mar 18) hints so. The US president has reacted after Israel carried out a strike on the South Pars Gas Field. Distancing America from the attack, Trump said that the US knew nothing about it. A seemingly angry Trump lashed out at Iran for attacking LNG facilities in Qatar as part of retaliation against South Pars Gas Field strike. While he declared that Israel will not carry out attacks on South Pars Field, he defended Qatar using expressions he has rarely used for any other nation. “The country of Qatar was in no way, shape, or form, involved with it, nor did it have any idea that it was going to happen.” He then issued a stern warning of blowing up the entire South Pars Gas Field if Qatar is attacked by Iran again. He said that he would do so “with or without the help of Israel” and added that he would not want to authorise such level of violent act because of the long term implications. Ahead of Trump's post, an Associated Press report stated that Israel carried out a strike on South Pars gas field in the Pesian Gulf even after Washington backed out of the plan. Also Read: 'Political structure strong': Araghchi responds after Larijani's killing; IRGC launches Khorramshahr, Kheibar Shekan missiles

US President Donald Trump distanced America from Israel’s strike on South Pars Gas Field and criticised Iran for hitting Qatar’s LNG sites. He warned of massive retaliation if Qatar is attacked again, while signalling frustration with Israel’s actions.

'NO MORE ATTACKS': Trump distances US from South Pars Gas Field attack by Israel, but warns Iran and defends 'very innocent' Qatar

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday suggested that if the US and Israel "finish off" whatever is left for Israel, and leave the “Straight” as it was, so that countries that operate the Strait of Hormuz will come to the rescue of the vital chokepoint. Trump further alleged that the US was “rapidly putting them out of business.” This post comes as a dig at the traditional European allies who have recently refused to join the US efforts to open the Strait of Hormuz.“I wonder what would happen if we 'finished off' what’s left of the Iranian Terror State, and let the Countries that use it, we don’t, be responsible for the so-called 'Straight?' That would get some of our non-responsive 'Allies' in gear, and fast!!! President DJT” wrote Trump.Donald Trump earlier on Monday lashed out at UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, saying he was "no Churchill" after his refusal to participate in the war. “Because essentially, there's no threat for the aircraft carriers right now. And I said no, no, we want things sent before the war, not after the war is won. So, yeah, I'm disappointed with Keir. I like him. I think he's a nice man, but I'm disappointed.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-us-war-casualties-esmail-khatib-killed-israel-strikes-larijani-1773831062842">Iran-US war: Tehran claims 3,200 US casualties; Israel says intelligence chief Esmail Khatib killed</a>Trump also said that he is looking forward to the visit of King Charles in April for the 250th anniversary of US Independence. He repeatedly suggested that White House was only equipped to host gatherings outside. “And you know the land in Washington was built on a swampy wetland.”“And when it rains, and you have the King of Saudi Arabia ... the King of the UK, I would say King of England, a great guy, he's coming in very soon,” said Trump. On the other hand, UK Labour MPs are advising “King Charles” on delaying his visit to the UK due to worsening relations between the UK and Donald Trump’s administration. King Charles has reportedly played a vital role in easing the relationship between the US and the UK, after Donald Trump's second state visit. Downing Street has not yet confirmed the visit, after there were suggestions from UK MPs that a war with Iran was “illegal” and it was another “diplomatic coup”&nbsp;

Donald Trump hints at escalating Iran conflict, criticises Keir Starmer and European allies over refusal to support US efforts in the Strait of Hormuz.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday suggested that if the US and Israel "finish off" whatever is left for Israel, and leave the “Straight” as it was, so that countries that operate the Strait of Hormuz will come to the rescue of the vital chokepoint. Trump further alleged that the US was “rapidly putting them out of business.” This post comes as a dig at the traditional European allies who have recently refused to join the US efforts to open the Strait of Hormuz. “I wonder what would happen if we 'finished off' what’s left of the Iranian Terror State, and let the Countries that use it, we don’t, be responsible for the so-called 'Straight?' That would get some of our non-responsive 'Allies' in gear, and fast!!! President DJT” wrote Trump. Donald Trump earlier on Monday lashed out at UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, saying he was "no Churchill" after his refusal to participate in the war. “Because essentially, there's no threat for the aircraft carriers right now. And I said no, no, we want things sent before the war, not after the war is won. So, yeah, I'm disappointed with Keir. I like him. I think he's a nice man, but I'm disappointed.” Also Read: Iran-US war: Tehran claims 3,200 US casualties; Israel says intelligence chief Esmail Khatib killed Trump also said that he is looking forward to the visit of King Charles in April for the 250th anniversary of US Independence. He repeatedly suggested that White House was only equipped to host gatherings outside. “And you know the land in Washington was built on a swampy wetland.” “And when it rains, and you have the King of Saudi Arabia ... the King of the UK, I would say King of England, a great guy, he's coming in very soon,” said Trump. On the other hand, UK Labour MPs are advising “King Charles” on delaying his visit to the UK due to worsening relations between the UK and Donald Trump’s administration. King Charles has reportedly played a vital role in easing the relationship between the US and the UK, after Donald Trump's second state visit. Downing Street has not yet confirmed the visit, after there were suggestions from UK MPs that a war with Iran was “illegal” and it was another “diplomatic coup”

Donald Trump hints at escalating Iran conflict, criticises Keir Starmer and European allies over refusal to support US efforts in the Strait of Hormuz.

Donald Trump suggests ‘finishing off' Iran, says Starmer is 'no Churchill'

Vance’s silence is sustainable for now, but it has an expiration date. If "Operation Epic Fury" drags on, if American casualties mount, or if the economic fallout from the Gulf triggers a recession, the anti-war wing of the MAGA movement will demand that Vance speak up.

'Invisible Vice President': Where is JD Vance and why is he missing in action as Marco Rubio leads the Iran War for Trump

US President Donald Trump managed to politicise the World Baseball Final, played between the USA and Venezuela on Tuesday (Mar 17) when he asked followers a question on his social media platform Truth: "STATEHOOD, #51, ANYONE?" Trump's post came after Venezuela had defeated Italy in the semis and now the South American country has beaten the baseball superpower to lift their maiden World Baseball title. Venezuela beat USA 3-2 in the final and Trump posted once again posted, this time more so a statement than a question: "STATEHOOD!!! President DJT." Trump, notably, had authorised the capture of Venezuela president Nicolas Maduro in January in a move that had shocked the world.<h2>Trump bats for Venezuela as US state #51 after USA loses World Baseball title</h2>In a thrilling final, played at Miami's LoanDepot Park, Venezuela's Eugenio Suárez drove in the winning run in the top of ninth against a MLB star-studded USA team. In the bottom of ninth, Daniel Palencia struck out Roman Anthony with 100mph heater and the Venezuelan players ran onto the field of dreams and were absolutely esctatic. With the loss, USA remains trophyless since 2017 in the World Baseball.Also Read - <a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/-senegral-forfeited-final-morocco-new-winner-of-africa-cup-of-nations-decalred-confederation-of-african-football-1773805121074">'Senegral forfeited final': Morocco new winner of Africa Cup of Nations</a>"Nobody believed in Venezuela, but now we win the championship today," an Suarez said afterwards. "What can I say about this? God is good! Jesus, he was with us the whole time. We have to glorify [him], put his name in front of everything."<h2>How did players respond to political messaging before and after the final?</h2>Donald Trump took the credit for Venezuela beating Italy in the semis and reaching the final with his Truth post reading: "Wow! Venezuela defeated Italy tonight, 4-2, in the WBC (Baseball!) Semifinal. They are looking really great. Good things are happening to Venezuela lately! I wonder what this magic is all about?" alluding to his move to capture Maduro.After the win, Venezuela's Ronald Acuna Jr declined to be lured into the the political messaging and said: "We’re here to speak baseball," and so they did by beating a country which has the biggest basbeball league in the world and litreally plays "World Series" every year.

In a thrilling World Baseball Classic final, played at Miami's LoanDepot Park on Tuesday (Mar 17), Venezuela's Eugenio Suárez drove in the winning run in the top of ninth against a MLB star-studded USA team to win the maiden title 3-2.

US President Donald Trump managed to politicise the World Baseball Final, played between the USA and Venezuela on Tuesday (Mar 17) when he asked followers a question on his social media platform Truth: "STATEHOOD, #51, ANYONE?" Trump's post came after Venezuela had defeated Italy in the semis and now the South American country has beaten the baseball superpower to lift their maiden World Baseball title. Venezuela beat USA 3-2 in the final and Trump posted once again posted, this time more so a statement than a question: "STATEHOOD!!! President DJT." Trump, notably, had authorised the capture of Venezuela president Nicolas Maduro in January in a move that had shocked the world. Trump bats for Venezuela as US state #51 after USA loses World Baseball title In a thrilling final, played at Miami's LoanDepot Park, Venezuela's Eugenio Suárez drove in the winning run in the top of ninth against a MLB star-studded USA team. In the bottom of ninth, Daniel Palencia struck out Roman Anthony with 100mph heater and the Venezuelan players ran onto the field of dreams and were absolutely esctatic. With the loss, USA remains trophyless since 2017 in the World Baseball. Also Read - 'Senegral forfeited final': Morocco new winner of Africa Cup of Nations "Nobody believed in Venezuela, but now we win the championship today," an Suarez said afterwards. "What can I say about this? God is good! Jesus, he was with us the whole time. We have to glorify [him], put his name in front of everything." How did players respond to political messaging before and after the final? Donald Trump took the credit for Venezuela beating Italy in the semis and reaching the final with his Truth post reading: "Wow! Venezuela defeated Italy tonight, 4-2, in the WBC (Baseball!) Semifinal. They are looking really great. Good things are happening to Venezuela lately! I wonder what this magic is all about?" alluding to his move to capture Maduro. After the win, Venezuela's Ronald Acuna Jr declined to be lured into the the political messaging and said: "We’re here to speak baseball," and so they did by beating a country which has the biggest basbeball league in the world and litreally plays "World Series" every year.

In a thrilling World Baseball Classic final, played at Miami's LoanDepot Park on Tuesday (Mar 17), Venezuela's Eugenio Suárez drove in the winning run in the top of ninth against a MLB star-studded USA team to win the maiden title 3-2.

'STATEHOOD': Trump bats for Venezuela as US state #51 after USA loses World Baseball title

Donald Trump on Monday signalled a coalition to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, with Marco Rubio set to name participating nations. However, many key allies have snubbed the proposal, firmly ruling out any military involvement or deployment of warships to the region.

Not our war: Here are countries that rejected Trump’s Hormuz naval support demand

Donald Trump criticised several European leaders on Tuesday (March 17) as tensions continue over the US-led war with Iran and the effort to secure the Strait of Hormuz. Trump took a swipe at Emmanuel Macron after France declined to join a multinational task force aimed at reopening the critical oil shipping route. During a French Defense Council meeting, Macron said: “We are not party to the conflict, and therefore France will never participate in operations to open or liberate the Strait of Hormuz in the current context.”&nbsp;Responding to the remarks in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters: “Well, he’ll be out of office very soon. So, we’ll have to see. I don’t know.” France’s next presidential election is scheduled for April 2027. Meanwhile, Trump also criticized Keir Starmer for not providing military support such as minesweepers to help secure the strait. “I’m disappointed,” Trump said, adding that “unfortunately, Keir is not Winston Churchill.” “He’s a very nice man with a beautiful family… but he, he doesn’t produce,” Trump said of Starmer, while also criticizing the UK’s immigration and energy policies.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-if-i-didn-t-terminate-iran-s-nuclear-deal-you-would-have-had-a-holocaust-says-trump-breaks-silence-on-joe-kent-s-resignation-1773763210605">'If I didn't terminate Iran's nuclear deal, you would have had a holocaust', says Trump; breaks silence on Joe Kent's resignation</a><h2>Irish PM defends Starmer from Trump's criticism over Iran war</h2>During the meeting, Micheal Martin stepped in to defend the British prime minister and emphasized the importance of cooperation between Europe and the United States. “Notwithstanding what has happened, the transatlantic relationship between Europe and the US is very, very important on a number of fronts, and I think we’ve had issues over the last year or two, but we settled them,” Martin said.&nbsp;He added that European leaders had worked with Washington to resolve trade disputes and said: “We’ve got a landing zone between Europe and US, and I think we can get a landing zone again.” Martin also praised Starmer’s efforts in improving relations between Ireland and Britain. “Keir Starmer has done a lot to reset the Irish-British relationship. I just want to put that on the record, but I do believe that he’s a very earnest, sound person who I think you have a capacity to get on with – you got on with him before,” the taoiseach added.<h2>Strait of Hormuz will be secure soon: Trump</h2>Despite criticism from allies, Trump expressed confidence that the strategic waterway would soon be secure.“It won’t be, I don’t believe, too long. We’re knocking the hell out of the coast. It’s basically the coast and the water. And it won’t be too long,” Trump told reporters. He did not provide a timeline or details on how the US plans to secure the strait but said regional partners are assisting. “The Middle Eastern states, including Israel, by the way, who has been terrific, the Middle Eastern states have been helping us a lot,” he said.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-trump-hosts-irish-pm-says-don-t-need-help-in-strait-of-hormuz-1773768564220/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-trump-hosts-irish-pm-says-don-t-need-help-in-strait-of-hormuz-1773768564220/embed</a><h2>‘Not afraid of anything’, says Trump in reply to Iran’s warning on US ground troops</h2>Trump also dismissed warnings from Iran that deploying US ground troops could turn into another Vietnam-style conflict. Asked about the possibility, Trump replied: “No, I’m not afraid of, I’m really not afraid of anything.” While saying the US is not ready to end the war yet, the president suggested a withdrawal could happen soon. “We’re not ready to leave yet, but we will be leaving in the near future,” Trump said, adding that he believes the US has inflicted enough damage that Iran could take a decade to rebuild. However, when asked about a “day-after” plan for Iran, Trump declined to provide details, saying only that the country has “been decimated from every standpoint.”&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation, and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

He will be out of office soon': Trump targets Macron after France rejects Hormuz task force

Donald Trump criticised several European leaders on Tuesday (March 17) as tensions continue over the US-led war with Iran and the effort to secure the Strait of Hormuz. Trump took a swipe at Emmanuel Macron after France declined to join a multinational task force aimed at reopening the critical oil shipping route. During a French Defense Council meeting, Macron said: “We are not party to the conflict, and therefore France will never participate in operations to open or liberate the Strait of Hormuz in the current context.” Responding to the remarks in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters: “Well, he’ll be out of office very soon. So, we’ll have to see. I don’t know.” France’s next presidential election is scheduled for April 2027. Meanwhile, Trump also criticized Keir Starmer for not providing military support such as minesweepers to help secure the strait. “I’m disappointed,” Trump said, adding that “unfortunately, Keir is not Winston Churchill.” “He’s a very nice man with a beautiful family… but he, he doesn’t produce,” Trump said of Starmer, while also criticizing the UK’s immigration and energy policies. Also Read: 'If I didn't terminate Iran's nuclear deal, you would have had a holocaust', says Trump; breaks silence on Joe Kent's resignation Irish PM defends Starmer from Trump's criticism over Iran war During the meeting, Micheal Martin stepped in to defend the British prime minister and emphasized the importance of cooperation between Europe and the United States. “Notwithstanding what has happened, the transatlantic relationship between Europe and the US is very, very important on a number of fronts, and I think we’ve had issues over the last year or two, but we settled them,” Martin said. He added that European leaders had worked with Washington to resolve trade disputes and said: “We’ve got a landing zone between Europe and US, and I think we can get a landing zone again.” Martin also praised Starmer’s efforts in improving relations between Ireland and Britain. “Keir Starmer has done a lot to reset the Irish-British relationship. I just want to put that on the record, but I do believe that he’s a very earnest, sound person who I think you have a capacity to get on with – you got on with him before,” the taoiseach added. Strait of Hormuz will be secure soon: Trump Despite criticism from allies, Trump expressed confidence that the strategic waterway would soon be secure. “It won’t be, I don’t believe, too long. We’re knocking the hell out of the coast. It’s basically the coast and the water. And it won’t be too long,” Trump told reporters. He did not provide a timeline or details on how the US plans to secure the strait but said regional partners are assisting. “The Middle Eastern states, including Israel, by the way, who has been terrific, the Middle Eastern states have been helping us a lot,” he said. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-trump-hosts-irish-pm-says-don-t-need-help-in-strait-of-hormuz-1773768564220/embed ‘Not afraid of anything’, says Trump in reply to Iran’s warning on US ground troops Trump also dismissed warnings from Iran that deploying US ground troops could turn into another Vietnam-style conflict. Asked about the possibility, Trump replied: “No, I’m not afraid of, I’m really not afraid of anything.” While saying the US is not ready to end the war yet, the president suggested a withdrawal could happen soon. “We’re not ready to leave yet, but we will be leaving in the near future,” Trump said, adding that he believes the US has inflicted enough damage that Iran could take a decade to rebuild. However, when asked about a “day-after” plan for Iran, Trump declined to provide details, saying only that the country has “been decimated from every standpoint.” Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation, and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Trump criticises Macron and Starmer over Iran conflict and Hormuz security as European leaders push for diplomacy and transatlantic cooperation

Multiple NATO allies snubbed U.S. President Donald Trump's request for helping secure the Strait of Hormuz. He specifically targeted Japan, South Korea and Germany for not reciprocating even though U.S. hosts thousands of troops in these countries. However, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz stressed that his country won't intervene unless the war ends.


Iran War: Trump Hosts Irish PM; Says Don't Need Help in Strait of Hormuz

U.S. President Donald Trump said Sunday (March 15, 2026) that NATO faces a "very bad" future if U.S. allies fail to help open the Strait of Hormuz, the critical oil transport conduit effectively shut by Iran in the West Asia war.


Iran War: NATO Allies Push Back as Trump Seeks Hormuz Support

Donald Trump said on Tuesday (March 17) that it was a ‘good thing’ that senior intelligence official Joe Kent resigned, criticizing him as ‘very weak on security’ over his stance on Iran. “When somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people,” Trump said from the Oval Office. “They’re not smart people, or they’re not savvy people.” His comments came just hours after Kent stepped down from his position as director of the National Counterterrorism Center. In his resignation letter, Kent wrote that “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war with Iran.”&nbsp;Kent further argued that Iran posed “no imminent threat” to the United States and accused Israel of influencing the Trump administration toward conflict. Trump, who originally appointed Kent, described him as someone he “always thought… was a nice guy,” but doubled down on his position that Iran remained a serious threat, adding that “it’s a good thing that he’s out.” “Iran was a threat,” Trump said. “Every country realized what a threat Iran was.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-nobody-thought-they-were-going-to-hit-trump-on-iran-s-strikes-on-gulf-nations-but-experts-clearly-warned-him-beforehand-1773757268350">‘Nobody thought they were going to hit’: Trump on Iran’s strikes on Gulf nations. But experts clearly warned him beforehand</a><h2>We do not need the help of anyone: Trump lashes out on NATO allies</h2>In a separate development, Trump posted on Truth Social that “most” allies in NATO were unwilling to participate in the US military operation against Iran. He said he was “not surprised by their action” and reiterated his long-standing criticism that NATO is “a one-way street.” “Because of the fact that we have had such Military Success, we no longer 'need,' or desire, the NATO Countries’ assistance — WE NEVER DID! Likewise, Japan, Australia, or South Korea."In fact, speaking as President of the United States of America, by far the Most Powerful Country Anywhere in the World, WE DO NOT NEED THE HELP OF ANYONE!"&nbsp;The statement followed reports that Trump had earlier asked NATO allies to assist in reopening the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, though he did not mention it directly in his post. Speaking to reporters about securing oil tanker routes through the strait, Trump said: "Well we don't need any help," while noting that NATO countries had supported US actions against Iran, which he described as targeting a nuclear threat.&nbsp;He added that the US had acted decisively, claiming it had dismantled Iran’s military capabilities, including its navy and air force. On NATO, Trump remarked that they were making “a foolish mistake.” “We don't need them but they should've been there.” When asked about comments from Emmanuel Macron that France would not join a Hormuz task force until hostilities ended, Trump responded that he would be out of office soon.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation, and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

'If I didn't terminate Iran's nuclear deal, you would have had a holocaust', says Trump; breaks silence on Joe Kent's resignation

Donald Trump said on Tuesday (March 17) that it was a ‘good thing’ that senior intelligence official Joe Kent resigned, criticizing him as ‘very weak on security’ over his stance on Iran. “When somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people,” Trump said from the Oval Office. “They’re not smart people, or they’re not savvy people.” His comments came just hours after Kent stepped down from his position as director of the National Counterterrorism Center. In his resignation letter, Kent wrote that “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war with Iran.” Kent further argued that Iran posed “no imminent threat” to the United States and accused Israel of influencing the Trump administration toward conflict. Trump, who originally appointed Kent, described him as someone he “always thought… was a nice guy,” but doubled down on his position that Iran remained a serious threat, adding that “it’s a good thing that he’s out.” “Iran was a threat,” Trump said. “Every country realized what a threat Iran was.” Also Read: ‘Nobody thought they were going to hit’: Trump on Iran’s strikes on Gulf nations. But experts clearly warned him beforehand We do not need the help of anyone: Trump lashes out on NATO allies In a separate development, Trump posted on Truth Social that “most” allies in NATO were unwilling to participate in the US military operation against Iran. He said he was “not surprised by their action” and reiterated his long-standing criticism that NATO is “a one-way street.” “Because of the fact that we have had such Military Success, we no longer 'need,' or desire, the NATO Countries’ assistance — WE NEVER DID! Likewise, Japan, Australia, or South Korea. "In fact, speaking as President of the United States of America, by far the Most Powerful Country Anywhere in the World, WE DO NOT NEED THE HELP OF ANYONE!" The statement followed reports that Trump had earlier asked NATO allies to assist in reopening the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, though he did not mention it directly in his post. Speaking to reporters about securing oil tanker routes through the strait, Trump said: "Well we don't need any help," while noting that NATO countries had supported US actions against Iran, which he described as targeting a nuclear threat. He added that the US had acted decisively, claiming it had dismantled Iran’s military capabilities, including its navy and air force. On NATO, Trump remarked that they were making “a foolish mistake.” “We don't need them but they should've been there.” When asked about comments from Emmanuel Macron that France would not join a Hormuz task force until hostilities ended, Trump responded that he would be out of office soon. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation, and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (March 17) said that that if he didn't terminate the Iran's nuclear deal, the world would have had a holocaust

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has sharply criticised U.S. President Donald Trump, accusing Washington of undermining diplomacy amid the ongoing conflict.

Araghchi said Iran sees “no reason” to negotiate with the United States, adding that talks were ongoing when Washington launched attacks, effectively ending diplomatic efforts.

He also dismissed reports of recent contact with U.S. officials, stating that his last communication with Washington came before the outbreak of the current war.

Meanwhile, President Trump has claimed that Iran “badly wants a deal” with the United States, though he has indicated he is not ready to negotiate under current terms.

The conflicting statements highlight deep divisions between both sides, as military escalation continues and diplomatic channels remain uncertain.

US-Iran War: Trump Claims Iran Badly Wants a Deal With US

US-Iran War: EU Leaders Rule Out Sending Warships To Strait of Hormuz

Donald Trump might be fighting a war with Iran, but he is also apparently busy planning the next innovation he would like to bring to the White House. According to Rodney Mims Cook Jr, the head of the Commission of Fine Arts, the columns outside the presidential home might soon go away. He told the Washington Post that the Ionic columns at the main entrance of the White House will be replaced with those in the Corinthian style. These columns are more ornate, and the president loves them, Cook told the outlet. Corinthian columns also adorn two other most recognisable buildings in Washington - The Capitol and the Supreme Court. The columns belong to Greek architecture and are considered its most luxurious offering. In fact, several of Trump's own buildings also have the Corinthian columns. &nbsp;The current columns along the White House’s North Portico have been standing tall since 1830. The White House has not officially said anything about replacing the columns.&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump appointed Cook as the head of the Commission of Fine Arts in October 2025. The department is responsible for advising the president on design, style and aesthetics. "Corinthian is the highest order [of column], and that’s what our other two branches of government have," Cook said. He even expressed shock at the original decision of not having them in the first place. "Why the White House didn’t originally use them, at least on the north front, which is considered the front door, is beyond me," he said. But experts don't think the Corinthian is appropriate for a structure like the White House. Steven Semes, a professor emeritus of architecture at the University of Notre Dame and an expert in classical architecture, told WaPo, "The Corinthian would be inappropriate for the Executive Residence."Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ballroom-construction-is-critical-for-security-concerns-white-house-tells-court-1765905834001">Ballroom construction is critical for security concerns: White House tells court</a><h2>Trump is building a grand ballroom at the White House</h2>He added that Ionic columns represent "the character of dignity, grace and a kind of intimacy or domesticity," and suit White House well since it is considered the "People's House". On the other hand, Corinthians are "used to express the height of formality and monumentality". Cook and others were appointed to the commission after all six previous members were fired. The White House said the new team was better suited to Trump's taste. The building is already undergoing major renovations as Trump is building a 90,000-square-foot ballroom. While the president said in July after signing an order that the addition would not affect the existing building, the entire two-story East Wing of the White House, built in 1902, has vanished.&nbsp;The National Trust for Historic Preservation has sued Trump over the ballroom, saying the required permissions and authorisations were not taken from Congress. Trump also has plans to build a 250-foot arch and revamp ​the Kennedy Centre.&nbsp; &nbsp;

The columns at the White House could soon become a thing of the past as the head of the Commission of Fine Arts plans to replace them with something more intricate. He recently told the Washington Post that Trump likes more ornate columns, and so they might soon have Corinthian-styled ones.

Donald Trump might be fighting a war with Iran, but he is also apparently busy planning the next innovation he would like to bring to the White House. According to Rodney Mims Cook Jr, the head of the Commission of Fine Arts, the columns outside the presidential home might soon go away. He told the Washington Post that the Ionic columns at the main entrance of the White House will be replaced with those in the Corinthian style. These columns are more ornate, and the president loves them, Cook told the outlet. Corinthian columns also adorn two other most recognisable buildings in Washington - The Capitol and the Supreme Court. The columns belong to Greek architecture and are considered its most luxurious offering. In fact, several of Trump's own buildings also have the Corinthian columns. The current columns along the White House’s North Portico have been standing tall since 1830. The White House has not officially said anything about replacing the columns. Trump appointed Cook as the head of the Commission of Fine Arts in October 2025. The department is responsible for advising the president on design, style and aesthetics. "Corinthian is the highest order [of column], and that’s what our other two branches of government have," Cook said. He even expressed shock at the original decision of not having them in the first place. "Why the White House didn’t originally use them, at least on the north front, which is considered the front door, is beyond me," he said. But experts don't think the Corinthian is appropriate for a structure like the White House. Steven Semes, a professor emeritus of architecture at the University of Notre Dame and an expert in classical architecture, told WaPo, "The Corinthian would be inappropriate for the Executive Residence." Also Read: Ballroom construction is critical for security concerns: White House tells court Trump is building a grand ballroom at the White House He added that Ionic columns represent "the character of dignity, grace and a kind of intimacy or domesticity," and suit White House well since it is considered the "People's House". On the other hand, Corinthians are "used to express the height of formality and monumentality". Cook and others were appointed to the commission after all six previous members were fired. The White House said the new team was better suited to Trump's taste. The building is already undergoing major renovations as Trump is building a 90,000-square-foot ballroom. While the president said in July after signing an order that the addition would not affect the existing building, the entire two-story East Wing of the White House, built in 1902, has vanished. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has sued Trump over the ballroom, saying the required permissions and authorisations were not taken from Congress. Trump also has plans to build a 250-foot arch and revamp the Kennedy Centre.

The columns at the White House could soon become a thing of the past as the head of the Commission of Fine Arts plans to replace them with something more intricate. He recently told the Washington Post that Trump likes more ornate columns, and so they might soon have Corinthian-styled ones.

White House columns to go? Nearly 200-year-old structures could soon be chucked

Don Quixote, a great literary character, is a cautionary tale of a self-proclaimed hero acting on flawed perceptions, often influenced by misleading advice. Actions similar to his— going into battle with perceived enemies like windmills — are called ‘quixotic’. With no immediate end in sight, the Iran war is slowly proving that President Donald Trump and his administration may have made a series of quixotic mistakes. These include not understanding Iran’s resilience, misjudging the speed of victory, not anticipating that Tehran would expand the war into the Gulf region, failing to secure allies' support, and not taking into account the global consequences of a war in which the world economy itself became a weapon. Here are 20 reasons why Trump is proving to be a new-age Don Quixote:<h2>1. Bad advice and overconfidence</h2>Trump and his team, led by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, appear to have relied on overly optimistic assessments that downplayed the risks of war. Shortly before the war escalated, Energy Secretary Chris Wright dismissed fears of oil market disruption. Advisers reportedly ignored warnings of sustained Iranian economic retaliation. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is said to have portrayed Iran’s regime as a fragile “house of cards” likely to collapse quickly under sustained bombardment. Some military officials’ cautions about Iran’s unwillingness to yield quickly were sidelined.<h2>2. Lack of domestic or allied nations' support</h2>The US struggled to secure backing from key allies, including those in Europe and members of the NATO military alliance. Trump’s requests for naval support to secure the Strait of Hormuz—including minesweepers and warships—were either declined or limited by partners such as the UK and Japan. Trump publicly criticised allies for a lack of reciprocity after decades of US security commitments. As he faces a midterm elections, both the Democrats and much of the American media are not enthused about the war, either.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-don-t-need-oil-on-day-18-of-war-trump-says-he-attacked-iran-to-save-other-countries-1773713367047">'We don't need oil': On Day 18 of war, Trump says he attacked Iran to...</a><h2>3. Iran regime change assumptions fail in the face of reality</h2>The US-Israeli strategy assumed that decapitation strikes—targeting top leadership and killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—would lead to sudden regime collapse or capitulation. Instead, Iran replaced its leadership with a younger, more hardline figure, Mojtaba Khamenei. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continued operating effectively, often appearing independent of any central command structure. The regime suppressed internal unrest. Weeks into the conflict, there was no meaningful shift in control or regime change.<h2>4. Operational strains and military incidents</h2>Reports surfaced of a refuelling aircraft crashing in Iraq, the warship USS Abraham Lincoln suffering technical issues, and USS Gerald R Ford experiencing a fire while deployed in the Red Sea. Though not combat-related, these incidents exposed US operational strain during wartime deployment.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/is-iran-being-framed-abbas-araghchi-claims-trump-is-using-lucas-drones-that-match-shahed-perfectly-to-attack-arab-nations-1773580911417">Is Iran being framed? Abbas Araghchi claims US is using 'LUCAS' drones that match Shahed 'perfectly' to attack Arab nations</a><h2>5. Iran’s economic warfare via the Strait of Hormuz</h2>US planners underestimated Iran’s ability to retaliate asymmetrically using its control of the Strait of Hormuz as leverage. Iran threatened tankers, laid mines, and launched selective drone strikes on oil infrastructure in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Targets included the Shah gas field near Abu Dhabi, the Fujairah Oil Industry Zone, Fujairah oil terminal, and Saudi Aramco facilities. Iran also warned civilians to evacuate ports and forced a halt in Gulf shipping, leading to a surge in oil prices of over 40 per cent. US gasoline costs rose, while global energy, food, fertiliser markets, and freight transport were disrupted.<h2>6. Too much time spent on build-up gave Iran time to prepare</h2>For weeks, the US carried out a military build-up before striking Iran on February 28, even as talks were ongoing for what Trump described as a ‘deal’, primarily centred on Iran giving up nuclear weapons ambitions. The prolonged build-up allowed Iran to harden defences, hide or reposition military assets, and prepare asymmetric responses such as drone attacks.&nbsp;<h2>7. Underestimating Iran’s resilience and pain tolerance</h2>Iran, which has prepared for decades for such a conflict, demonstrated a high tolerance for sustained war. Its multi-layered governance and defence systems allowed continuity despite leadership losses. Treating the war as existential, Iran used sustained missile and drone attacks to deplete US, Israeli, and allied air defence systems.<h2>8. Misjudging war duration and costs involved</h2>The US has already spent tens of billions of dollars on the war effort, with costs continuing to rise. Officials initially estimated the war would end within four to five weeks, but it has already entered the third week. Trump is alternating between claims of victory and appeals for international assistance.&nbsp;<h2>9. Iran’s quick regional escalation was unexpected</h2>Trump indicated he had not been advised that Iran would attack neighbouring US allies in the Gulf. Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait were targeted, along with attempted drone attacks on the US embassy in Baghdad. Iran also disrupted regional infrastructure, including airports and urban centres.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/saudi-arabia-s-mbs-speaks-with-trump-regularly-urges-harsh-actions-against-iran-report-1773651226374">Saudi Arabia’s MBS speaks with Trump regularly, urges harsh actions against Iran: Report</a><h2>10. A global war already</h2>The conflict quickly had global consequences. Economic fallout affected US and international markets, and Washington was forced to ease restrictions on Russian oil exports to stabilise global supply.&nbsp;<h2>11. Iran's proxies keep the war simmering</h2>Hezbollah is engaging Israeli forces in Lebanon, while the Houthis in Yemen have threatened to disrupt shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait at the Red Sea chokepoint. With no boots on the ground in Iran from either the US or Israel, decisive battlefield victory remains elusive. The war has become multi-front rather than single-theatre.<h2>12. Iranian power structures are more entrenched than anticipated</h2>The war has further consolidated the Islamic Republic’s internal power. Public displays of support, including large turnouts during Quds Day rallies, highlight internal cohesion. This reduces the likelihood that external military pressure alone can produce decisive outcomes.<h2>13. Mismatch between military success and real outcomes</h2>Trump frequently claimed that Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities have been largely destroyed. However, continued US attacks—including on strategic locations such as Kharg Island—suggest otherwise. Iran’s missile-launching capability may be degraded, but it continues to launch attacks, indicating the presence of hidden or dispersed assets.<h2>14. Nuclear disarmament or military degradation — unclear objective</h2>The US and Israel entered the war with the stated aim of eliminating Iran’s nuclear weapons capability and missile arsenal. Neither objective has been fully achieved. Iran continues to insist on retaining its civilian nuclear programme, complicating negotiations and prolonging the conflict.<h2>15. Iran turned US military presence in Gulf into a vulnerability</h2>Iran’s attacks on US military bases in Gulf countries—often using low-cost drones—have exposed vulnerabilities in these high-value installations. This has made the US presence a liability for host nations, many of which have remained defensive rather than actively joining the conflict.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-trump-slams-allies-over-hormuz-mission-cites-no-enthusiasm-wion-1773733486200/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-trump-slams-allies-over-hormuz-mission-cites-no-enthusiasm-wion-1773733486200/embed</a><h2>16. The trap of the escalation ladder</h2>Both sides appear locked in an escalation cycle, unwilling to de-escalate, yet unable to deliver a decisive blow. Iran has steadily increased the cost of war, while US-Israeli strikes have not achieved a breakthrough, creating a prolonged stalemate.<h2>17. Global supply chain strain as a weapon</h2>From the Strait of Hormuz to regional airports, Iran’s calculated targeting has created logistical disruptions. Missile and drone attacks have affected global supply chains, impacting everything from energy shipments to manufactured goods and food distribution.<h2>18. Cyberwar and non-traditional warfare opened new fronts</h2>Iran-linked groups have conducted cyberattacks on infrastructure and institutions, adding a significant cyber warfare dimension. Information warfare has also intensified, including control over domestic internet systems. These multiple fronts complicate the definition of victory.<h2>19. Economic interdependence limits decisive action</h2>Global oil market volatility, inflation risks, and energy supply disruptions have put pressure on all sides to avoid extreme escalation. As a result, neither side is pursuing total war, contributing to a prolonged stalemate.<h2>20. Iran’s ability to strike Israel over long distances</h2>Iran has demonstrated the capability to strike Israel from thousands of kilometres away. Some missile and drone attacks have penetrated Israeli air defence systems and landed within Israeli territory, exposing vulnerabilities despite the geographical distance.Don Quixote had an adviser, Sancho Panza, who often protected him—even by giving misleading information to prevent reckless actions. The question remains whether Trump received sound advice. Did his aides, including son-in-law Jared Kushner, mislead him on the Iran war? Whatever the case, Trump may ultimately need to rely on his dealmaking approach to end the conflict through negotiations rather than prolonged warfare.

The Iran war is slowly exposing US miscalculations—from overconfidence and weak allied backing to Iran’s resilience, proxy warfare and economic disruption. With no decisive victory in sight, is this turning out to be a quixotic excursion for Trump?

Don Quixote, a great literary character, is a cautionary tale of a self-proclaimed hero acting on flawed perceptions, often influenced by misleading advice. Actions similar to his— going into battle with perceived enemies like windmills — are called ‘quixotic’. With no immediate end in sight, the Iran war is slowly proving that President Donald Trump and his administration may have made a series of quixotic mistakes. These include not understanding Iran’s resilience, misjudging the speed of victory, not anticipating that Tehran would expand the war into the Gulf region, failing to secure allies' support, and not taking into account the global consequences of a war in which the world economy itself became a weapon. Here are 20 reasons why Trump is proving to be a new-age Don Quixote: 1. Bad advice and overconfidence Trump and his team, led by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, appear to have relied on overly optimistic assessments that downplayed the risks of war. Shortly before the war escalated, Energy Secretary Chris Wright dismissed fears of oil market disruption. Advisers reportedly ignored warnings of sustained Iranian economic retaliation. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is said to have portrayed Iran’s regime as a fragile “house of cards” likely to collapse quickly under sustained bombardment. Some military officials’ cautions about Iran’s unwillingness to yield quickly were sidelined. 2. Lack of domestic or allied nations' support The US struggled to secure backing from key allies, including those in Europe and members of the NATO military alliance. Trump’s requests for naval support to secure the Strait of Hormuz—including minesweepers and warships—were either declined or limited by partners such as the UK and Japan. Trump publicly criticised allies for a lack of reciprocity after decades of US security commitments. As he faces a midterm elections, both the Democrats and much of the American media are not enthused about the war, either. Also read: 'We don't need oil': On Day 18 of war, Trump says he attacked Iran to... 3. Iran regime change assumptions fail in the face of reality The US-Israeli strategy assumed that decapitation strikes—targeting top leadership and killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—would lead to sudden regime collapse or capitulation. Instead, Iran replaced its leadership with a younger, more hardline figure, Mojtaba Khamenei. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continued operating effectively, often appearing independent of any central command structure. The regime suppressed internal unrest. Weeks into the conflict, there was no meaningful shift in control or regime change. 4. Operational strains and military incidents Reports surfaced of a refuelling aircraft crashing in Iraq, the warship USS Abraham Lincoln suffering technical issues, and USS Gerald R Ford experiencing a fire while deployed in the Red Sea. Though not combat-related, these incidents exposed US operational strain during wartime deployment. Also read: Is Iran being framed? Abbas Araghchi claims US is using 'LUCAS' drones that match Shahed 'perfectly' to attack Arab nations 5. Iran’s economic warfare via the Strait of Hormuz US planners underestimated Iran’s ability to retaliate asymmetrically using its control of the Strait of Hormuz as leverage. Iran threatened tankers, laid mines, and launched selective drone strikes on oil infrastructure in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Targets included the Shah gas field near Abu Dhabi, the Fujairah Oil Industry Zone, Fujairah oil terminal, and Saudi Aramco facilities. Iran also warned civilians to evacuate ports and forced a halt in Gulf shipping, leading to a surge in oil prices of over 40 per cent. US gasoline costs rose, while global energy, food, fertiliser markets, and freight transport were disrupted. 6. Too much time spent on build-up gave Iran time to prepare For weeks, the US carried out a military build-up before striking Iran on February 28, even as talks were ongoing for what Trump described as a ‘deal’, primarily centred on Iran giving up nuclear weapons ambitions. The prolonged build-up allowed Iran to harden defences, hide or reposition military assets, and prepare asymmetric responses such as drone attacks. 7. Underestimating Iran’s resilience and pain tolerance Iran, which has prepared for decades for such a conflict, demonstrated a high tolerance for sustained war. Its multi-layered governance and defence systems allowed continuity despite leadership losses. Treating the war as existential, Iran used sustained missile and drone attacks to deplete US, Israeli, and allied air defence systems. 8. Misjudging war duration and costs involved The US has already spent tens of billions of dollars on the war effort, with costs continuing to rise. Officials initially estimated the war would end within four to five weeks, but it has already entered the third week. Trump is alternating between claims of victory and appeals for international assistance. 9. Iran’s quick regional escalation was unexpected Trump indicated he had not been advised that Iran would attack neighbouring US allies in the Gulf. Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait were targeted, along with attempted drone attacks on the US embassy in Baghdad. Iran also disrupted regional infrastructure, including airports and urban centres. Also read: Saudi Arabia’s MBS speaks with Trump regularly, urges harsh actions against Iran: Report 10. A global war already The conflict quickly had global consequences. Economic fallout affected US and international markets, and Washington was forced to ease restrictions on Russian oil exports to stabilise global supply. 11. Iran's proxies keep the war simmering Hezbollah is engaging Israeli forces in Lebanon, while the Houthis in Yemen have threatened to disrupt shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait at the Red Sea chokepoint. With no boots on the ground in Iran from either the US or Israel, decisive battlefield victory remains elusive. The war has become multi-front rather than single-theatre. 12. Iranian power structures are more entrenched than anticipated The war has further consolidated the Islamic Republic’s internal power. Public displays of support, including large turnouts during Quds Day rallies, highlight internal cohesion. This reduces the likelihood that external military pressure alone can produce decisive outcomes. 13. Mismatch between military success and real outcomes Trump frequently claimed that Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities have been largely destroyed. However, continued US attacks—including on strategic locations such as Kharg Island—suggest otherwise. Iran’s missile-launching capability may be degraded, but it continues to launch attacks, indicating the presence of hidden or dispersed assets. 14. Nuclear disarmament or military degradation — unclear objective The US and Israel entered the war with the stated aim of eliminating Iran’s nuclear weapons capability and missile arsenal. Neither objective has been fully achieved. Iran continues to insist on retaining its civilian nuclear programme, complicating negotiations and prolonging the conflict. 15. Iran turned US military presence in Gulf into a vulnerability Iran’s attacks on US military bases in Gulf countries—often using low-cost drones—have exposed vulnerabilities in these high-value installations. This has made the US presence a liability for host nations, many of which have remained defensive rather than actively joining the conflict. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-trump-slams-allies-over-hormuz-mission-cites-no-enthusiasm-wion-1773733486200/embed 16. The trap of the escalation ladder Both sides appear locked in an escalation cycle, unwilling to de-escalate, yet unable to deliver a decisive blow. Iran has steadily increased the cost of war, while US-Israeli strikes have not achieved a breakthrough, creating a prolonged stalemate. 17. Global supply chain strain as a weapon From the Strait of Hormuz to regional airports, Iran’s calculated targeting has created logistical disruptions. Missile and drone attacks have affected global supply chains, impacting everything from energy shipments to manufactured goods and food distribution. 18. Cyberwar and non-traditional warfare opened new fronts Iran-linked groups have conducted cyberattacks on infrastructure and institutions, adding a significant cyber warfare dimension. Information warfare has also intensified, including control over domestic internet systems. These multiple fronts complicate the definition of victory. 19. Economic interdependence limits decisive action Global oil market volatility, inflation risks, and energy supply disruptions have put pressure on all sides to avoid extreme escalation. As a result, neither side is pursuing total war, contributing to a prolonged stalemate. 20. Iran’s ability to strike Israel over long distances Iran has demonstrated the capability to strike Israel from thousands of kilometres away. Some missile and drone attacks have penetrated Israeli air defence systems and landed within Israeli territory, exposing vulnerabilities despite the geographical distance. Don Quixote had an adviser, Sancho Panza, who often protected him—even by giving misleading information to prevent reckless actions. The question remains whether Trump received sound advice. Did his aides, including son-in-law Jared Kushner, mislead him on the Iran war? Whatever the case, Trump may ultimately need to rely on his dealmaking approach to end the conflict through negotiations rather than prolonged warfare.

The Iran war is slowly exposing US miscalculations—from overconfidence and weak allied backing to Iran’s resilience, proxy warfare and economic disruption. With no decisive victory in sight, is this turning out to be a quixotic excursion for Trump?

Donald Quixote? Iran is no windmill- 20 reasons why Trump may have been misled by advisors, allies about winning the war

US President Donald Trump, in a Truth Social post, again floated the idea of Venezuelan statehood for the US. Trump hinted that since his takeover of the country, there had been positive changes in the South American country. He was pointing out the victory of the Venezuelan Baseball team over Italy in the World Baseball Classic (WBC) semifinals on March 16, 2026. Trump then suggested, “STATEHOOD, #51, ANYONE?”"Wow! Venezuela defeated Italy tonight, 4-2, in the WBC (Baseball!) Semifinal," wrote Trump, “Good things are happening to Venezuela lately! I wonder what this magic is all about?”The remark follows the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, after Operation Absolute Resolve, in Venezuela, in the early hours of January 3, 2026. Maduro was then paraded through the city of New York before being placed on trial. The first hearing of the trial was on January 5, 2026, for Nacro terrorism charges. Both Maduro and Flores pleaded “not guilty”. Originally set for March 17, the second hearing was rescheduled to March 26. He is being represented by Barry Pollack, who also represented the journalist and whistleblower Julian Assange.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-iran-war-claims-former-presidents-deny-talks-1773725925327">No talks with Trump on Iran attack, say Clinton, Obama, Bush and Biden</a>

Venezuela will head for a matchup with the US in the final on Tuesday, March 17, at loanDepot Park in Miami. Both the US and Venezuela were among the favourites in the tournament. Venezuela dealt a huge upset in the tournament by defeating the Defending Champion Japan on its way to the final. A victory for Venezuela at the widely considered national sport of the US and favourite pastime of the country will serve as a sweet moment of redemption for the South American nation. &nbsp;&nbsp;

Donald Trump suggested Venezuela could become the 51st US state after its WBC win, amid ongoing US intervention and Nicolas Maduro’s trial.

US President Donald Trump, in a Truth Social post, again floated the idea of Venezuelan statehood for the US. Trump hinted that since his takeover of the country, there had been positive changes in the South American country. He was pointing out the victory of the Venezuelan Baseball team over Italy in the World Baseball Classic (WBC) semifinals on March 16, 2026. Trump then suggested, “STATEHOOD, #51, ANYONE?” "Wow! Venezuela defeated Italy tonight, 4-2, in the WBC (Baseball!) Semifinal," wrote Trump, “Good things are happening to Venezuela lately! I wonder what this magic is all about?” The remark follows the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, after Operation Absolute Resolve, in Venezuela, in the early hours of January 3, 2026. Maduro was then paraded through the city of New York before being placed on trial. The first hearing of the trial was on January 5, 2026, for Nacro terrorism charges. Both Maduro and Flores pleaded “not guilty”. Originally set for March 17, the second hearing was rescheduled to March 26. He is being represented by Barry Pollack, who also represented the journalist and whistleblower Julian Assange. Also Read: No talks with Trump on Iran attack, say Clinton, Obama, Bush and Biden

Donald Trump suggested Venezuela could become the 51st US state after its WBC win, amid ongoing US intervention and Nicolas Maduro’s trial.

‘Statehood #51?’: Trump’s sneaky Venezuela remark after WBC victory

US President Donald Trump claimed twice on Monday that he had spoken to former US presidents about the war in Iran and that an unnamed President supposedly approved his attacks on Iran. Howevere all four living former US Presidents have outrightly denied having any conversation with the US President Donald Trump about the attack, according to reports from various US media outlets.&nbsp;“Every president knew- I’ve spoken to a certain president, who I like actually, a past president, former president, he said, ‘I wish I did it, I wish I did,’ but they didn’t do it. I’m doing it,” said Trump. However, later on Monday at an event at the Oval Office, Trump was being pressed by a Fox News reporter, Peter Doocy, whether he spoke to George W Bush. Trump responded “no”; he also did not want to explicitly mention whether he spoke to Barack Obama or Bill Clinton.&nbsp;“I can’t tell you that. It would be very bad for his career, even though he’s got no career left,” said TrumpIn a fact check by CNN's Jeff Zeleny and Samantha Waldenberg, who reached out to “all four living former presidents.” A spokesperson for Clinton told CNN that no spokesperson for Clinton said that a conversation between Trump and Clinton had not taken place. Similarly, aides close to Bush, Obama and Biden also suggested that no conversation happened with Trump.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-strike-khamenei-aircraft-mehrabad-airport-iran-1773664685159">Israel claims strike on aircraft linked to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei at Tehran’s Mehrabad airport</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump: &quot;I spoke to one of the former presidents who I actually like. I actually speak to some, I do like some people, it&#39;d be shocking. And he said, &#39;I wish I did what you did.&#39; Other presidents, somebody should&#39;ve done it. 47 years this went on.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/OELNsYSt1D">pic.twitter.com/OELNsYSt1D</a>&mdash; Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/2033645461261750612?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 16, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Trump, who had very little domestic support for his Iran war, is desperate as the mid-term elections are fast approaching. His claim that former Presidents come to his aid is far-fetched, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had long been mobilising for a war with Iran, and every other Presidents have somehow managed to dodge a war with Iran, infact Barack Obama in 2015 managed to sign a nuclear deal also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran which limited Iran's stockpile of enriched Uranium, in exchange of sanction relief. But Trump abruptly walked out of the JCPOA in his first term in office.&nbsp;Trump now finds himself in a dilemma, as his stated objective of regime change seems increasingly unlikely "without boots on the ground," and deploying troops in Iran will at least be damaging to Trump's political career, and at most result in a civil war within MAGA and probably within the US. Trump earlier admitted that he was “shocked” by Iranian retaliation, which almost every analyst in the world had predicted. Trump is now calling the war a “very high-level chess game”. “These are really smart people and violent people and vicious people. And some very nice people. And some are very nice but violent; they turned violent."

Donald Trump claimed former US presidents backed his Iran strikes, but Clinton, Obama, Bush and Biden have denied any such conversations, reports say.

US President Donald Trump claimed twice on Monday that he had spoken to former US presidents about the war in Iran and that an unnamed President supposedly approved his attacks on Iran. Howevere all four living former US Presidents have outrightly denied having any conversation with the US President Donald Trump about the attack, according to reports from various US media outlets. “Every president knew- I’ve spoken to a certain president, who I like actually, a past president, former president, he said, ‘I wish I did it, I wish I did,’ but they didn’t do it. I’m doing it,” said Trump. However, later on Monday at an event at the Oval Office, Trump was being pressed by a Fox News reporter, Peter Doocy, whether he spoke to George W Bush. Trump responded “no”; he also did not want to explicitly mention whether he spoke to Barack Obama or Bill Clinton. “I can’t tell you that. It would be very bad for his career, even though he’s got no career left,” said Trump In a fact check by CNN's Jeff Zeleny and Samantha Waldenberg, who reached out to “all four living former presidents.” A spokesperson for Clinton told CNN that no spokesperson for Clinton said that a conversation between Trump and Clinton had not taken place. Similarly, aides close to Bush, Obama and Biden also suggested that no conversation happened with Trump. Also Read: Israel claims strike on aircraft linked to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei at Tehran’s Mehrabad airport

Donald Trump claimed former US presidents backed his Iran strikes, but Clinton, Obama, Bush and Biden have denied any such conversations, reports say.

No talks with Trump on Iran attack, say Clinton, Obama, Bush and Biden

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

US-Iran War: Gabbard's Revelation Undercuts Trump & Bibi's War Objective

US-Iran War: Will U.S. & Israel Deploy Troops in Iran?

US Launches Blitz to Reopen Hormuz Strait |8,000 Service Members Deployed

Trump's Iran War Frays Ties With Allies, as Conflict Widens Trump Searches for an Endgame

'Nobody wants to be leader of Iran', says Trump; praises US military strength

US-Iran War: Trump's War in West Asia Invites Criticism

US-Iran War: Donald Trump Balances War Strategy with Oil Market Risks

Denmark prepared for potential US strike in Greenland-Report

US-Iran War: Israel Admits Trump Asked to Hold Further Strikes on Gas Fields

US-Iran War | Tulsi Gabbard: Israel Focused on Disabling Iran's Laedership

US-Iran War: Did Israel Push US Into War With Iran?

US, Japan unveil nuclear deal, bet $40B on SMR in next gen energy push

US President Donald Trump Meets Japanese Counterpart Sanae Takaichi at Oval Office

US Central Banks Dot Plot Unfolds One Cut, Fed Defies Trump's Call for an Immediate Rate Cut Again

US-Iran War | Trump: Israel Won't Hit South Pars, Iran Must Not Target Qatar

US senator unveils Epstein document contradicting Trump’s Mar-a-Lago claim

Trump warns both Iran, Israel after attack on South Pars Gas Field and Qatar

Donald Trump suggests ‘finishing off' Iran, says Starmer is 'no Churchill'

Where is JD Vance and why is he missing in action as Marco Rubio leads the war

Trump bats for Venezuela as US state #51 after USA loses World Baseball title

Not our war: Here are countries that rejected Trump’s Hormuz coalition demand

He will be out of...: Trump targets French president Macron over Hormuz stance

Iran War: Trump Hosts Irish PM; Says Don't Need Help in Strait of Hormuz

Iran War: NATO Allies Push Back as Trump Seeks Hormuz Support

'If I didn't terminate Iran's nuclear deal, you would have had...', says Trump

US-Iran War: Trump Claims Iran Badly Wants a Deal With US