Between 2025 and 2030, artificial intelligence (AI) can lead to the revenue depletion of around 20 per cent in the global IT services sector, said a report by Jefferies. The report by the American agency further said that even though AI will impact IT services revenue, AI could boost productivity&nbsp;in application services and BPOs.&nbsp;"AI to impact 20% of existing IT services revenues by FY30. We expect AI to drive a 5-35% productivity boost across consulting, Application services, infrastructure services, and BPO services," noted the report.&nbsp;It said companies can hold back on IT spending, fearing that AI advancements could render investments obsolete. AI can result in productivity gains, reducing revenues from existing IT services. Thirdly, clients have yet to fully realise returns on the heavy incremental technology spending of about USD 280 billion annually during 2021-24.&nbsp;&nbsp;"AI-led revenue deflation is likely to impact growth in FY27 as revenue deflation from AI may be front-ended and any new spends driven by AI are likely to be back-ended," the report added.&nbsp;However, the report adds that the deflationary trend is expected to cap overall sectoral growth at just 1.5 per cent to 3 per cent, compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) over 2024-29, compared to the double-digit expansion IT services had enjoyed in previous years.&nbsp;Overall, non-AI-linked IT services grow at 1-3 per cent year on year.&nbsp;It added that non-AI-related IT services revenue will decline at the rate of 1-3 per cent each year.&nbsp;"While we expect underlying growth in non-AI-related IT services to grow at 1-3% every year, the 20% revenue deflation in these services will result in a 1-3% decline each year. As a result, overall IT services spend globally may grow in the range of 1.5-3.0% CAGR over CY24-29," said the report.&nbsp;Mid-sized IT firms have a higher risk of revenue deflation, but they will deliver better growth.&nbsp;"Mid-sized IT firms having higher risks of AI-led revenue deflation, we believe they are still better placed to deliver higher growth as they are better placed to gain market share," noted the report.

Between 2025 and 2030, artificial intelligence (AI) can lead to the revenue depletion of around 20 per cent in the global IT services sector, said a report by Jefferies.

Between 2025 and 2030, artificial intelligence (AI) can lead to the revenue depletion of around 20 per cent in the global IT services sector, said a report by Jefferies. The report by the American agency further said that even though AI will impact IT services revenue, AI could boost productivity in application services and BPOs. "AI to impact 20% of existing IT services revenues by FY30. We expect AI to drive a 5-35% productivity boost across consulting, Application services, infrastructure services, and BPO services," noted the report. It said companies can hold back on IT spending, fearing that AI advancements could render investments obsolete. AI can result in productivity gains, reducing revenues from existing IT services. Thirdly, clients have yet to fully realise returns on the heavy incremental technology spending of about USD 280 billion annually during 2021-24. "AI-led revenue deflation is likely to impact growth in FY27 as revenue deflation from AI may be front-ended and any new spends driven by AI are likely to be back-ended," the report added. However, the report adds that the deflationary trend is expected to cap overall sectoral growth at just 1.5 per cent to 3 per cent, compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) over 2024-29, compared to the double-digit expansion IT services had enjoyed in previous years. Overall, non-AI-linked IT services grow at 1-3 per cent year on year. It added that non-AI-related IT services revenue will decline at the rate of 1-3 per cent each year. "While we expect underlying growth in non-AI-related IT services to grow at 1-3% every year, the 20% revenue deflation in these services will result in a 1-3% decline each year. As a result, overall IT services spend globally may grow in the range of 1.5-3.0% CAGR over CY24-29," said the report. Mid-sized IT firms have a higher risk of revenue deflation, but they will deliver better growth. "Mid-sized IT firms having higher risks of AI-led revenue deflation, we believe they are still better placed to deliver higher growth as they are better placed to gain market share," noted the report.

AI to disrupt IT revenue? A report said companies can hold back on IT spending, fearing that AI advancements could render investments obsolete.&nbsp;

AI to impact 20% of existing IT services revenues by FY30: Report

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence is reshaping how we work, it is creating new opportunities for human-AI collaboration rather than replacement. According to the World Economic Forum's Future in the upcoming years, &nbsp;AI may displace 85 million jobs in a few years. It will simultaneously create 97 million new roles, marking a net positive transformation in the global employment landscape.

<h2>The Evolution of Human-AI&nbsp;</h2>Modern workplaces are witnessing an unprecedented integration of artificial intelligence tools that augment human capabilities rather than replace them entirely. McKinsey's latest research indicates that 40 per cent of companies are already using AI to enhance productivity, with employees reporting increased job satisfaction when working alongside intelligent systems.

In creative industries, AI serves as a collaborative partner, helping designers generate concepts, writers overcome creative blocks, and marketers personalise campaigns at scale. "AI doesn't replace human creativity. It amplifies it," said Dr. Sarah Chen, Director of Digital Transformation at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.<h2>Enhanced Decision-Making Through Data Intelligence</h2>One of the most significant advantages of human-AI collaboration lies in enhanced decision-making capabilities. PwC's Global AI Study shows that the companies leveraging AI for decision support are seeing around 25 per cent improvement in operational efficiency and a 30 per cent reduction in errors.&nbsp;In healthcare, radiologists working with AI-powered diagnostic tools achieve 94 per cent accuracy rates compared to 88 per cent when working independently, this is as per the research published in Nature Medicine. Similarly, financial analysts using AI-driven market analysis tools make more informed investment decisions, with portfolios showing 15 per cent better performance over traditional methods.<h2>Reskilling for the AI-Augmented Workplace</h2>The transition to AI-augmented workplaces necessitates comprehensive reskilling programmes. The World Bank's Human Capital Project emphasises that 50 per cent of all employees will need reskilling by 2025 to remain relevant in an AI-integrated economy.

Many top successful companies are investing heavily in employee development. Amazon's £575 million commitment to retraining it's 100,000 workers. Their this approach focuses on digital literacy, data analysis, and AI collaboration skills. These programmes report 78 per cent job retention rates and increased employee engagement.<h2>Addressing Ethical Considerations and Trust</h2>As human-AI partnerships evolve more in the future, addressing ethical concerns becomes very important. The European Union's AI Act provides a regulatory framework ensuring AI systems remain transparent, accountable, and human-centric.Building trust between humans and AI systems requires clear communication about AI capabilities and limitations. Companies implementing transparent AI policies report 85 per cent employee acceptance rates, compared to 45 per cent in organisations without clear AI governance frameworks, according to Deloitte's AI Trust Survey.<h2>The Economic Impact of Collaborative Intelligence</h2>The economic implications of human-AI collaboration are substantial.In manufacturing, human-AI teams have reduced production downtime by 45 per cent whilst improving product quality standards. Customer service departments using AI-powered chatbots alongside human agents achieve 67 per cent faster resolution times and 85 per cent customer satisfaction rates.<h2>The Future Workplace Ecosystem</h2>The workplace of 2030 will feature seamless human-AI integration across all sectors. Emerging technologies like natural language processing, computer vision, and predictive analytics will become as commonplace as email and spreadsheets today.&nbsp;This transformation requires proactive preparation from both employers and employees.

So companies must invest in robust AI infrastructure while prioritising human-centered design principles. Workers must embrace continuous learning and adaptability as core competencies.&nbsp;The future of work isn't about choosing between humans and AI. It's about creating synergistic partnerships that leverage the unique strengths of both.&nbsp;&nbsp;The organisations and individuals who embrace collaborative intelligence will most likely to shape the next chapter of human productivity and innovation.

The workplace of tomorrow won't be humans versus machines, but humans working alongside AI to unlock unprecedented productivity and innovation. This partnership is transforming how we work, learn, and solve complex challenges.

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence is reshaping how we work, it is creating new opportunities for human-AI collaboration rather than replacement. According to the World Economic Forum's Future in the upcoming years, AI may displace 85 million jobs in a few years. It will simultaneously create 97 million new roles, marking a net positive transformation in the global employment landscape.

The workplace of tomorrow won't be humans versus machines, but humans working alongside AI to unlock unprecedented productivity and innovation. This partnership is transforming how we work, learn, and solve complex challenges.

The future of work: Humans and AI side by side

Lithium-ion batteries power almost everything today from smartphones to electric cars. However, as demand rises, so do concerns about cost, limited supply, and environmental damage caused by mining.&nbsp;According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), demand for lithium is expected to grow by over 400 per cent by 2030. This has pushed researchers to search for alternative materials that are more sustainable and easier to produce.&nbsp;Now, a team at the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) has developed an artificial intelligence framework that may hold the answer. Their study, published in Cell Reports Physical Science, reveals five new materials that could eventually replace lithium in future batteries.&nbsp;<h2>How AI Found These New Materials</h2>Traditional research on battery chemistry is slow and expensive. Scientists usually test one material at a time, which can take years.&nbsp;The NJIT team created an AI tool that can scan and analyse massive databases of chemical compounds. According to the report, this AI is able to identify potential candidates 100 times faster than conventional lab testing.&nbsp;Lead author Professor Arun Kumar explained that the AI looks for materials with high energy storage potential, stability, and low environmental impact. Using this method, it flagged five promising options that had never been considered before.&nbsp;The researchers believe these new materials could work in sodium-based or potassium-based batteries, both of which are cheaper and more widely available than lithium.&nbsp;<h2>What This Means for the Future</h2>If these materials are proven effective, they could change the battery industry entirely. Sodium and potassium are far more abundant than lithium, which means cheaper and more sustainable batteries.&nbsp;Professor Kumar said in the NJIT press release that this approach “opens a new path for energy storage research,” combining AI’s speed with human expertise to find solutions faster.&nbsp;Experts note that while more testing is needed, this discovery could help reduce global dependence on lithium and support the growth of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage.&nbsp;The research highlights how AI is becoming a powerful tool for solving some of the world’s most urgent technological challenges.

AI researchers at NJIT discovered five new materials that could replace lithium in batteries. These alternatives, based on sodium and potassium, are cheaper, more sustainable energy storage, addressing lithium’s cost, supply, and environmental issues for the future of electric vehicles.

Lithium-ion batteries power almost everything today from smartphones to electric cars. However, as demand rises, so do concerns about cost, limited supply, and environmental damage caused by mining. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), demand for lithium is expected to grow by over 400 per cent by 2030. This has pushed researchers to search for alternative materials that are more sustainable and easier to produce. Now, a team at the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) has developed an artificial intelligence framework that may hold the answer. Their study, published in Cell Reports Physical Science, reveals five new materials that could eventually replace lithium in future batteries. How AI Found These New Materials Traditional research on battery chemistry is slow and expensive. Scientists usually test one material at a time, which can take years. The NJIT team created an AI tool that can scan and analyse massive databases of chemical compounds. According to the report, this AI is able to identify potential candidates 100 times faster than conventional lab testing. Lead author Professor Arun Kumar explained that the AI looks for materials with high energy storage potential, stability, and low environmental impact. Using this method, it flagged five promising options that had never been considered before. The researchers believe these new materials could work in sodium-based or potassium-based batteries, both of which are cheaper and more widely available than lithium. What This Means for the Future If these materials are proven effective, they could change the battery industry entirely. Sodium and potassium are far more abundant than lithium, which means cheaper and more sustainable batteries. Professor Kumar said in the NJIT press release that this approach “opens a new path for energy storage research,” combining AI’s speed with human expertise to find solutions faster. Experts note that while more testing is needed, this discovery could help reduce global dependence on lithium and support the growth of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage. The research highlights how AI is becoming a powerful tool for solving some of the world’s most urgent technological challenges.

AI researchers at NJIT discovered five new materials that could replace lithium in batteries. These alternatives, based on sodium and potassium, are cheaper, more sustainable energy storage, addressing lithium’s cost, supply, and environmental issues for the future of electric vehicles.

AI could end the world’s dependence on Lithium - Here’s how

Aspiring influencers are being urged to take their health seriously after experts unveiled a disturbing projection of what a career in content creation could do to the human body by 2050. While social media stars may appear to bask in luxury—jet-setting holidays, endless freebies, and lucrative sponsorships—the grind behind the glam carries hidden health costs. Researchers have designed a model named “Ava”, a chilling representation of how today’s influencer habits could shape physical appearance in the decades ahead.&nbsp;Ava doesn’t resemble the polished, filtered images we’re used to. She has uneven skin, thinning hair, swollen under-eyes with dark circles, a crooked posture, and irritated red eyes. Her slouch, doctors warn, stems from “tech neck”—damage caused by spending hours hunched over smartphones. Prolonged forward head tilt and rounded shoulders not only create chronic pain but can permanently alter spinal alignment.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/smartphones-can-give-you-haemorrhoids-experts-caution-don-t-spend-more-than-1756981294325">Your smartphone can give you haemorrhoids: Experts caution, don't spend more than...</a>&nbsp;Skin damage, meanwhile, is linked to overuse of cosmetics, frequent product swapping, and constant exposure to bright ring lights and screens, accelerating aging and pigmentation changes. The tired eyes and puffiness reflect digital eye strain from endless editing, streaming, and scrolling, compounded by erratic sleep schedules common in the influencer lifestyle. Sleep deprivation further fuels fatigue, swelling, and hair loss.&nbsp;Speaking of hair, traction alopecia—caused by heavy extensions and tight hairstyles—leads to receding hairlines and bald patches, another risk Ava exhibits. Add to this the widespread use of fillers: when misused, they can warp natural facial symmetry, leaving cheeks bloated, skin texture artificial, and features oddly distorted.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/jawaharlal-nehru-s-first-delhi-residence-sold-for-record-1-100-crore-in-india-s-biggest-home-deal-1756906231133">Jawaharlal Nehru’s first Delhi residence sold for record ₹1,100 crore in India's biggest home deal</a>&nbsp;A spokesperson for casino.org, which commissioned the medically-informed model, said the image highlights how the pursuit of fame, relentless content demands, and pressure to meet beauty standards can take a visible toll.

Ava, the model

The future face of influencers: AI reveals how content creators could look like in 2050

Aspiring influencers are being urged to take their health seriously after experts unveiled a disturbing projection of what a career in content creation could do to the human body by 2050. While social media stars may appear to bask in luxury—jet-setting holidays, endless freebies, and lucrative sponsorships—the grind behind the glam carries hidden health costs. Researchers have designed a model named “Ava”, a chilling representation of how today’s influencer habits could shape physical appearance in the decades ahead. Ava doesn’t resemble the polished, filtered images we’re used to. She has uneven skin, thinning hair, swollen under-eyes with dark circles, a crooked posture, and irritated red eyes. Her slouch, doctors warn, stems from “tech neck”—damage caused by spending hours hunched over smartphones. Prolonged forward head tilt and rounded shoulders not only create chronic pain but can permanently alter spinal alignment. Also Read: Your smartphone can give you haemorrhoids: Experts caution, don't spend more than... Skin damage, meanwhile, is linked to overuse of cosmetics, frequent product swapping, and constant exposure to bright ring lights and screens, accelerating aging and pigmentation changes. The tired eyes and puffiness reflect digital eye strain from endless editing, streaming, and scrolling, compounded by erratic sleep schedules common in the influencer lifestyle. Sleep deprivation further fuels fatigue, swelling, and hair loss. Speaking of hair, traction alopecia—caused by heavy extensions and tight hairstyles—leads to receding hairlines and bald patches, another risk Ava exhibits. Add to this the widespread use of fillers: when misused, they can warp natural facial symmetry, leaving cheeks bloated, skin texture artificial, and features oddly distorted. Also Read: Jawaharlal Nehru’s first Delhi residence sold for record ₹1,100 crore in India's biggest home deal A spokesperson for casino.org, which commissioned the medically-informed model, said the image highlights how the pursuit of fame, relentless content demands, and pressure to meet beauty standards can take a visible toll.

Experts warn influencers of severe long-term health risks by 2050, unveiling ‘Ava', an AI model showing the toll of beauty pressures and digital overuse

The future face of influencers: AI reveals how social media creators could look like in 2050

ChatGPT users worldwide on Wednesday (September 3) reported a major outage, with hundreds of users taking it to social media to vent their frustration over disruptions. According to Downdetector, a website that tracks online service status, hundreds of reports have been filed in the past 20 minutes. In India alone, over 439 users flagged problems, suggesting the issue is widespread.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/woman-complains-her-indian-neighbours-in-ireland-are-noisy-and-aggressive-nothing-beats-this-loudness-1756882643001">Woman complains her Indian neighbours in Ireland are 'noisy and aggressive' - 'Nothing beats this loudness'</a>&nbsp;The outage appears to be hitting both the website and mobile app, with users experiencing network errors. While some report normal functioning, many are unable to access the chatbot at all. OpenAI, ChatGPT’s developer, has not yet commented on the disruption.&nbsp;This is not the first time ChatGPT has faced downtime. Past outages include: A global failure lasting over three hours disrupted users in Spain, Argentina, and the US (Jan 23, 2025), A glitch left the platform not working (Dec 26, 2024), A major outage generated more than 22,000 Downdetector complaints (Feb 5, 2025). In recent times, minor outages were reported on Sept 1, 2, and 3, 2025, including a 10-minute disruption on Tuesday (September 2).&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-kim-ju-ae-kim-jong-un-s-respected-daughter-making-her-foreign-debut-in-china-could-she-be-north-korea-s-first-female-leader-1756894130316">Who is Kim Ju Ae? Kim Jong Un’s ‘respected daughter’ making her foreign debut in China - Could she be North Korea’s first female leader?</a><h2>What are the alternatives to ChatGPT?</h2>Users seeking immediate options can turn to other AI chatbots such as:Google Gemini – optimised for fast text generationMicrosoft Copilot – offers ChatGPT-like features with image generationYouChat – integrates search for updated, relevant answersJasper Chat – built for creators, with SEO-friendly content tools&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-no-one-has-been-conspiring-no-conspiracies-at-all-russia-responds-to-trump-s-plotting-against-us-claim-about-putin-xi-and-kim-1756891592323">'No one has been conspiring, no conspiracies at all': Russia responds to Trump's ‘plotting against US’ claim about Putin, Xi and Kim</a>

ChatGPT faces fresh global outage, users flock to social media with complaints

ChatGPT users worldwide on Wednesday (September 3) reported a major outage, with hundreds of users taking it to social media to vent their frustration over disruptions. According to Downdetector, a website that tracks online service status, hundreds of reports have been filed in the past 20 minutes. In India alone, over 439 users flagged problems, suggesting the issue is widespread. Also Read: Woman complains her Indian neighbours in Ireland are 'noisy and aggressive' - 'Nothing beats this loudness' The outage appears to be hitting both the website and mobile app, with users experiencing network errors. While some report normal functioning, many are unable to access the chatbot at all. OpenAI, ChatGPT’s developer, has not yet commented on the disruption. This is not the first time ChatGPT has faced downtime. Past outages include: A global failure lasting over three hours disrupted users in Spain, Argentina, and the US (Jan 23, 2025), A glitch left the platform not working (Dec 26, 2024), A major outage generated more than 22,000 Downdetector complaints (Feb 5, 2025). In recent times, minor outages were reported on Sept 1, 2, and 3, 2025, including a 10-minute disruption on Tuesday (September 2). Also Read: Who is Kim Ju Ae? Kim Jong Un’s ‘respected daughter’ making her foreign debut in China - Could she be North Korea’s first female leader? What are the alternatives to ChatGPT? Users seeking immediate options can turn to other AI chatbots such as: Google Gemini – optimised for fast text generation Microsoft Copilot – offers ChatGPT-like features with image generation YouChat – integrates search for updated, relevant answers Jasper Chat – built for creators, with SEO-friendly content tools Also Read: 'No one has been conspiring, no conspiracies at all': Russia responds to Trump's ‘plotting against US’ claim about Putin, Xi and Kim

Several users across the globe faced disruptions on Wednesday (September 3). Users also expressed their frustration on various social media platforms

Generation Z, born into the internet age in the late 1990s and early 2000s, are widely known to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) — from content creation to workplace automation. But new, unsettling research suggests that the generation leading AI adoption is also its biggest casualty in the workforce. The reason? Entry-level jobs traditionally filled by young workers are rapidly being replaced by AI systems.<h2>Studies show how Gen Z is disproportionately affected by AI adoption</h2>Recent studies by Stanford University and Deloitte suggest that AI may be transitioning from assistant to replacement — particularly for Generation Z roles.Gen Z, typically defined as those born between 1997 and 2012, are true digital natives. Growing up surrounded by smartphones, social media, and constantly evolving technology has made them early adopters of AI tools.Deloitte’s Gen Z and Millennial Survey found that approximately 25 per cent of Gen Z workers who use AI at work do so “all or most of the time.” Many believe AI can increase productivity and improve work–life balance.A 2025 report from Master of Code Global found that 70 per cent of Gen Z actively use generative AI tools, often daily. These are used for tasks such as writing, coding, design, and problem-solving.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/ai-therapy-explained-can-chatbots-help-with-mental-health-1756709730837">AI therapy explained: Can chatbots help with mental health?</a> Trust in AI is also high among Gen Z. A Forbes survey revealed that 41 per cent of Gen Z believe in AI more than human colleagues, and around 50 per cent feel more comfortable discussing workplace matters with AI than with their managers. On average, Gen Z interact with AI around 12 times per week — nearly double that of Generation X (7 times) and triple that of Baby Boomers (4 times).<h2>AI is reducing Gen Z job opportunities — and it’s a growing concern</h2>But while Gen Z may be leading the charge in AI adoption, they are also facing disproportionate job losses due to automation.A 2025 study by Stanford University’s Digital Economy Lab, led by Erik Brynjolfsson and colleagues, analysed payroll data from ADP and found that employment among workers aged 22 to 25 in AI-exposed fields — such as software development, customer service, and clerical work — declined by 13 per cent between late 2022 and mid-2025.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/artificial-intelligence-a-teacher-s-enemy-or-best-friend-1756371574726/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/artificial-intelligence-a-teacher-s-enemy-or-best-friend-1756371574726/embed</a>In contrast, older workers in the same fields saw stable or even increasing employment rates.The report attributes this generational divide to the nature of tasks involved. Entry-level roles often involve “codified knowledge” — structured, repeatable tasks that are easily automated by AI. Meanwhile, older workers possess “tacit knowledge” — experience-based skills and intuition that are harder to automate.As Brynjolfsson put it, the challenge ahead is ensuring that AI serves as a tool for empowerment, not exclusion — especially for those just starting out in the workforce.The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 reinforced these findings, warning that 40 per cent of employers expect to reduce staff in roles where AI can automate routine tasks. Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/personalised-learning-with-ai-how-classrooms-are-evolving-explained-1756657872678">Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained</a><h2>Entry-level positions — often held by Gen Z — are particularly at risk. Is it time to pivot?</h2>Concerns are spreading globally. A 2024 survey conducted in India by BML Munjal University found that 44 per cent of Gen Z respondents fear job displacement due to AI, while 63 per cent worry about long-term job instability.In response to these challenges, many Gen Z workers are reassessing their career options. A report by Business Insider highlighted a growing shift among younger workers towards blue-collar and skilled trades such as electrical work, plumbing, and landscaping that are less susceptible to automation.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/future-of-healthcare-how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-hospitals-1756656911576">Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals</a>Experts argue that systemic changes are needed. Strategic policy interventions — such as updated curricula focusing on AI collaboration, digital resilience, and soft skills — are essential. Hiring practices must also adapt to ensure entry-level roles remain viable pathways into long-term careers.Without these changes, Gen Z faces the risk of becoming a “lost generation” in the workforce. The erosion of entry-level opportunities could lead to lasting effects on economic mobility and social equity.<h2>What's the way forward for Gen Z workers threatened by AI automation?</h2>AI is undoubtedly transforming the world of work, but without deliberate efforts to guide this transformation, it risks deepening generational inequalities. While Gen Z may be the most AI-literate generation yet, they also stand to lose the most from unregulated AI-driven disruption.As Brynjolfsson warns, the future depends on balancing AI innovation with policies that protect and prepare young workers for a fast-evolving, tech-enabled job environment.

Generation Z leads AI adoption at the workplace but faces significant job losses as entry-level roles are automated. Studies show decline in young workers in AI-exposed jobs. What's the way out for this vulnerable generation?

Generation Z, born into the internet age in the late 1990s and early 2000s, are widely known to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) — from content creation to workplace automation. But new, unsettling research suggests that the generation leading AI adoption is also its biggest casualty in the workforce. The reason? Entry-level jobs traditionally filled by young workers are rapidly being replaced by AI systems. Studies show how Gen Z is disproportionately affected by AI adoption Recent studies by Stanford University and Deloitte suggest that AI may be transitioning from assistant to replacement — particularly for Generation Z roles. Gen Z, typically defined as those born between 1997 and 2012, are true digital natives. Growing up surrounded by smartphones, social media, and constantly evolving technology has made them early adopters of AI tools. Deloitte’s Gen Z and Millennial Survey found that approximately 25 per cent of Gen Z workers who use AI at work do so “all or most of the time.” Many believe AI can increase productivity and improve work–life balance. A 2025 report from Master of Code Global found that 70 per cent of Gen Z actively use generative AI tools, often daily. These are used for tasks such as writing, coding, design, and problem-solving. Also read: AI therapy explained: Can chatbots help with mental health? Trust in AI is also high among Gen Z. A Forbes survey revealed that 41 per cent of Gen Z believe in AI more than human colleagues, and around 50 per cent feel more comfortable discussing workplace matters with AI than with their managers. On average, Gen Z interact with AI around 12 times per week — nearly double that of Generation X (7 times) and triple that of Baby Boomers (4 times). AI is reducing Gen Z job opportunities — and it’s a growing concern But while Gen Z may be leading the charge in AI adoption, they are also facing disproportionate job losses due to automation. A 2025 study by Stanford University’s Digital Economy Lab, led by Erik Brynjolfsson and colleagues, analysed payroll data from ADP and found that employment among workers aged 22 to 25 in AI-exposed fields — such as software development, customer service, and clerical work — declined by 13 per cent between late 2022 and mid-2025. https://www.wionews.com/videos/artificial-intelligence-a-teacher-s-enemy-or-best-friend-1756371574726/embed In contrast, older workers in the same fields saw stable or even increasing employment rates. The report attributes this generational divide to the nature of tasks involved. Entry-level roles often involve “codified knowledge” — structured, repeatable tasks that are easily automated by AI. Meanwhile, older workers possess “tacit knowledge” — experience-based skills and intuition that are harder to automate. As Brynjolfsson put it, the challenge ahead is ensuring that AI serves as a tool for empowerment, not exclusion — especially for those just starting out in the workforce. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 reinforced these findings, warning that 40 per cent of employers expect to reduce staff in roles where AI can automate routine tasks. Also read: Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained Entry-level positions — often held by Gen Z — are particularly at risk. Is it time to pivot? Concerns are spreading globally. A 2024 survey conducted in India by BML Munjal University found that 44 per cent of Gen Z respondents fear job displacement due to AI, while 63 per cent worry about long-term job instability. In response to these challenges, many Gen Z workers are reassessing their career options. A report by Business Insider highlighted a growing shift among younger workers towards blue-collar and skilled trades such as electrical work, plumbing, and landscaping that are less susceptible to automation. Also read: Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals Experts argue that systemic changes are needed. Strategic policy interventions — such as updated curricula focusing on AI collaboration, digital resilience, and soft skills — are essential. Hiring practices must also adapt to ensure entry-level roles remain viable pathways into long-term careers. Without these changes, Gen Z faces the risk of becoming a “lost generation” in the workforce. The erosion of entry-level opportunities could lead to lasting effects on economic mobility and social equity. What's the way forward for Gen Z workers threatened by AI automation? AI is undoubtedly transforming the world of work, but without deliberate efforts to guide this transformation, it risks deepening generational inequalities. While Gen Z may be the most AI-literate generation yet, they also stand to lose the most from unregulated AI-driven disruption. As Brynjolfsson warns, the future depends on balancing AI innovation with policies that protect and prepare young workers for a fast-evolving, tech-enabled job environment.

Generation Z leads AI adoption at the workplace but faces significant job losses as entry-level roles are automated. Studies show decline in young workers in AI-exposed jobs. What's the way out for this vulnerable generation?

Gen Z uses AI the most, but it's eating up their jobs. Disturbing trend of AI turning from assistant to replacement of young workers

Artificial intelligence (AI) is slowly becoming part of classrooms and learning apps worldwide. AI can adjust lessons to fit each student’s needs. It can be personalised for each learner, where every learner follows a path built around their strengths, weaknesses, and goals.&nbsp;According to a 2023 report by UNESCO, AI-based education tools can “create individual learning pathways” and help reduce learning gaps, especially in large classrooms. Platforms such as Duolingo and DreamBox already use AI to adapt lessons in real time based on student performance.&nbsp;<h2>How AI Builds Learning Paths</h2>AI systems collect data on how a student performs in quizzes, assignments, and practice exercises. They then analyse this information to design a customised learning journey. A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) noted that adaptive systems can quickly identify “where learners are struggling and adjust content accordingly.” This means a student strong in grammar but weak in vocabulary gets extra vocabulary practice while moving ahead in grammar.&nbsp;<h2>Adaptive Content and Feedback</h2>AI tutors can change the difficulty of tasks automatically. If a student solves problems easily, the system moves them to advanced topics. If they struggle, it gives extra practice or simpler explanations.&nbsp;Immediate feedback is another advantage. A study published found that students using AI-powered platforms received corrections instantly, which improved concept mastery faster than waiting for teacher feedback. Language apps like Duolingo use this approach, showing learners their mistakes as they practise.<h2>Motivation and Engagement</h2>AI can also keep students motivated. Some tools use gamification, points, badges, or even animated characters to make lessons engaging. The University of Illinois found that “personalised systems improve learner motivation by giving relevant and challenging tasks.” For children, AI tutors can even appear as virtual instructors based on familiar characters, making learning feel interactive and fun.<h2>The Future of Personalised Learning</h2>While AI tools are not a replacement for teachers, they can make education more inclusive and effective. Teachers can use AI reports to see exactly where students need help, saving time in crowded classrooms. UNESCO has stressed that AI should remain a support system, ensuring “teachers guide critical thinking while AI handles routine and repetitive tasks.”&nbsp;As technology develops, personalised learning may become a standard part of schools, bringing private-tutor style teaching to more students at scale.

AI in education is changing classrooms with personalised lessons, instant feedback, and engaging. It helps reduce learning gaps and motivates students. Teachers still guide thinking, while AI supports learning. Know more below.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is slowly becoming part of classrooms and learning apps worldwide. AI can adjust lessons to fit each student’s needs. It can be personalised for each learner, where every learner follows a path built around their strengths, weaknesses, and goals. According to a 2023 report by UNESCO, AI-based education tools can “create individual learning pathways” and help reduce learning gaps, especially in large classrooms. Platforms such as Duolingo and DreamBox already use AI to adapt lessons in real time based on student performance. How AI Builds Learning Paths AI systems collect data on how a student performs in quizzes, assignments, and practice exercises. They then analyse this information to design a customised learning journey. A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) noted that adaptive systems can quickly identify “where learners are struggling and adjust content accordingly.” This means a student strong in grammar but weak in vocabulary gets extra vocabulary practice while moving ahead in grammar. Adaptive Content and Feedback AI tutors can change the difficulty of tasks automatically. If a student solves problems easily, the system moves them to advanced topics. If they struggle, it gives extra practice or simpler explanations. Immediate feedback is another advantage. A study published found that students using AI-powered platforms received corrections instantly, which improved concept mastery faster than waiting for teacher feedback. Language apps like Duolingo use this approach, showing learners their mistakes as they practise. Motivation and Engagement AI can also keep students motivated. Some tools use gamification, points, badges, or even animated characters to make lessons engaging. The University of Illinois found that “personalised systems improve learner motivation by giving relevant and challenging tasks.” For children, AI tutors can even appear as virtual instructors based on familiar characters, making learning feel interactive and fun. The Future of Personalised Learning While AI tools are not a replacement for teachers, they can make education more inclusive and effective. Teachers can use AI reports to see exactly where students need help, saving time in crowded classrooms. UNESCO has stressed that AI should remain a support system, ensuring “teachers guide critical thinking while AI handles routine and repetitive tasks.” As technology develops, personalised learning may become a standard part of schools, bringing private-tutor style teaching to more students at scale.

AI in education is changing classrooms with personalised lessons, instant feedback, and engaging. It helps reduce learning gaps and motivates students. Teachers still guide thinking, while AI supports learning. Know more below.

Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained

AI is reshaping how doctors diagnose disease. Now, new AI-enabled tools can analyse scans, lab results, and even patient photos to help catch illnesses earlier.<h2>Smarter Medical Imaging</h2>Northwestern University in the US tested an AI tool that drafts X-ray reports, completing almost 95 per cent of the work. This trial showed that it boosted report-writing speed by about 40 per cent, allowing radiologists to focus on critical and more complex cases. Similarly, a researchers in China created a phone-based AI that identified childhood eye problems such as myopia or strabismus from simple photos, as per report it helps in catching nearly all cases as per report published in PubMed.&nbsp;<h2>Early Warnings in Critical Care</h2>Teams at Johns Hopkins University and Singapore have built AI-enabled systems that can spot signs of sepsis up to 12 hours earlier than doctors could normally detect. Sepsis is life-threatening if missed, and these “early warning” tools could save thousands of lives, according to the Mayo Clinic Platform.&nbsp;<h2>Accuracy and Risks</h2>A University of Virginia Health study found that ChatGPT-4 diagnosed clinical cases correctly 92 per cent of the time. Experts say AI can be an “effective and powerful tool for diagnosis”; however, doctors still play a crucial role in guiding and checking results as they are getting time to check and get involved in more complex cases. As one analysis put it, AI can “analyse large amounts of medical data and find patterns doctors might miss.” As of now, AI can help doctors and hospitals in many new ways. It will be exciting to see what the future holds and how efficiently and ethically it is adopted. Researchers says patients may soon see AI chatbots or apps giving 24/7 advice, helping them decide when to see a doctor or seek urgent care.

AI is changing healthcare. From faster X-ray reports to early warnings for sepsis, new tools are helping doctors diagnose quicker and more accurately. What the future holds for ethical and safe use of AI in hospitals is worth watching. Know more below.

AI is reshaping how doctors diagnose disease. Now, new AI-enabled tools can analyse scans, lab results, and even patient photos to help catch illnesses earlier. Smarter Medical Imaging Northwestern University in the US tested an AI tool that drafts X-ray reports, completing almost 95 per cent of the work. This trial showed that it boosted report-writing speed by about 40 per cent, allowing radiologists to focus on critical and more complex cases. Similarly, a researchers in China created a phone-based AI that identified childhood eye problems such as myopia or strabismus from simple photos, as per report it helps in catching nearly all cases as per report published in PubMed. Early Warnings in Critical Care Teams at Johns Hopkins University and Singapore have built AI-enabled systems that can spot signs of sepsis up to 12 hours earlier than doctors could normally detect. Sepsis is life-threatening if missed, and these “early warning” tools could save thousands of lives, according to the Mayo Clinic Platform. Accuracy and Risks A University of Virginia Health study found that ChatGPT-4 diagnosed clinical cases correctly 92 per cent of the time. Experts say AI can be an “effective and powerful tool for diagnosis”; however, doctors still play a crucial role in guiding and checking results as they are getting time to check and get involved in more complex cases. As one analysis put it, AI can “analyse large amounts of medical data and find patterns doctors might miss.” As of now, AI can help doctors and hospitals in many new ways. It will be exciting to see what the future holds and how efficiently and ethically it is adopted. Researchers says patients may soon see AI chatbots or apps giving 24/7 advice, helping them decide when to see a doctor or seek urgent care.

AI is changing healthcare. From faster X-ray reports to early warnings for sepsis, new tools are helping doctors diagnose quicker and more accurately. What the future holds for ethical and safe use of AI in hospitals is worth watching. Know more below.

Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals

Is artificial intelligence helping or hurting education? In this video, we explore whether AI is a teacher’s greatest ally or its biggest threat. From AI-powered tools in classrooms to concerns about job displacement and academic integrity, educators and students alike are asking: is AI changing the future of teaching for better or worse? Join us as we break down the pros, cons, and what's next for AI in education.


Artificial Intelligence: A teacher's enemy or best friend? 

A city in China has made it mandatory to teach an artificial intelligence course at the primary and secondary school level, Global Times reported. This will ensure that basic knowledge about the growing technology taking over the world reaches the youngest at an early age. Hangzhou, where the AI company DeepSeek is located, will require the schools to introduce general AI education in schools starting from the new semester. The students will need to complete 10 class hours in an academic year. The education bureau of the city wants to prepare AI talent, keeping in mind future needs. For this, it has released a pair of documents which detail the curriculum plans and AI competency standards for teachers, along with the guidelines that need to be followed.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/chatgpt-crowned-best-ai-chess-player-after-final-win-check-where-gemini-grok-ranked-1754893716915">ChatGPT crowned best AI chess player after final win — Check where Gemini, Grok ranked</a>&nbsp;There are different ways in which the schools can impart basic knowledge about AI to students. The mix bag includes the option to have an AI course that can be intensively taught in a week. The schools can also opt to add the AI course to subjects like information technology and science. This will offer flexibility to the schools, who will be free to incorporate the course whichever way suits them the best. Meanwhile, basic AI learning activities can be arranged during after-school programmes.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/ai-has-human-rights-these-advocacy-groups-think-so-as-sentient-artificial-intelligence-can-have-feelings-ai-ethics-sentience-chatbot-emotions-1756283571281">AI has human rights? These advocacy groups think so, as sentient Artificial Intelligence can have ‘feelings’, 'suffer and grieve'</a>&nbsp;<h2>How AI curriculum will be spread through the grades in China</h2>The education bureau guidelines on AI state that in the first and second grades, the curriculum would introduce students to AI applications and teach them to recognise them. They will also engage with AI devices and learn to use them to do basic things in their everyday life. In the third and fourth grades, students will learn to use AI for their school work, which would involve using the AI tools to gather text, images and audio resources. To show that they have grasped the concept of AI applications, students will prepare simple projects with the help of teachers. At each level, they will be taught about the responsible and ethical use of AI while keeping in mind the importance of protecting privacy.&nbsp;In middle school, focus will be on data preparation, model training and learning the core principles behind algorithms. In high school, students will be encouraged to develop AI design skills through projects. Hangzhou is home to eight million people and a fast-growing innovation hub. DeepSeek put the city in the limelight earlier this year when it came out as a competitor to ChatGPT.

The Chinese city that is home to DeepSeek has made it mandatory for schools to teach Artificial Intelligence. It has released a set of guidelines for this purpose. The aim is to make students ready to use AI in daily life and eventually develop AI tools.

A city in China has made it mandatory to teach an artificial intelligence course at the primary and secondary school level, Global Times reported. This will ensure that basic knowledge about the growing technology taking over the world reaches the youngest at an early age. Hangzhou, where the AI company DeepSeek is located, will require the schools to introduce general AI education in schools starting from the new semester. The students will need to complete 10 class hours in an academic year. The education bureau of the city wants to prepare AI talent, keeping in mind future needs. For this, it has released a pair of documents which detail the curriculum plans and AI competency standards for teachers, along with the guidelines that need to be followed. Also Read: ChatGPT crowned best AI chess player after final win — Check where Gemini, Grok ranked There are different ways in which the schools can impart basic knowledge about AI to students. The mix bag includes the option to have an AI course that can be intensively taught in a week. The schools can also opt to add the AI course to subjects like information technology and science. This will offer flexibility to the schools, who will be free to incorporate the course whichever way suits them the best. Meanwhile, basic AI learning activities can be arranged during after-school programmes. Also Read: AI has human rights? These advocacy groups think so, as sentient Artificial Intelligence can have ‘feelings’, 'suffer and grieve' How AI curriculum will be spread through the grades in China The education bureau guidelines on AI state that in the first and second grades, the curriculum would introduce students to AI applications and teach them to recognise them. They will also engage with AI devices and learn to use them to do basic things in their everyday life. In the third and fourth grades, students will learn to use AI for their school work, which would involve using the AI tools to gather text, images and audio resources. To show that they have grasped the concept of AI applications, students will prepare simple projects with the help of teachers. At each level, they will be taught about the responsible and ethical use of AI while keeping in mind the importance of protecting privacy. In middle school, focus will be on data preparation, model training and learning the core principles behind algorithms. In high school, students will be encouraged to develop AI design skills through projects. Hangzhou is home to eight million people and a fast-growing innovation hub. DeepSeek put the city in the limelight earlier this year when it came out as a competitor to ChatGPT.

The Chinese city that is home to DeepSeek has made it mandatory for schools to teach Artificial Intelligence. It has released a set of guidelines for this purpose. The aim is to make students ready to use AI in daily life and eventually develop AI tools.

THIS Chinese city, home of DeepSeek, has made Artificial Intelligence mandatory in schools

Artificial Intelligence has been deemed such a threat by "AI Doomers" that some of them have completely given up on a future for humanity. Machine Intelligence Research Institute researcher Nate Soares told The Atlantic that AI will turn against humans in a couple of years. He is so sure of this happening that he has stopped saving for his retirement. "I just don’t expect the world to be around," he said. The technology is assuming new proportions day by day, and very soon, we could have rogue superintelligent AIs that will not only take away all our jobs but also eventually wipe out humanity. Centre for AI Safety director Dan Hendrycks also has the same belief, and so do several other scientists. Hundreds of experts are sure that AI will one day leave the clutches of humans and turn against us. They fear that while AI continues to become more and more intelligent, humans are not preparing for the worst. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/ai-apocalypse-is-coming-the-bubble-of-overvalued-stocks-underperforming-apps-will-burst-soon-but-who-will-survive-1755840456121">AI APOCALYPSE is coming: The bubble of overvalued stocks, underperforming apps will burst soon, but who will survive?</a>&nbsp;<h2>AI resorted to blackmailing, was prepared to kill to save itself</h2>AI has already started manipulating systems when threatened with being shut down. They are also blackmailing users, as shown in a simulation. In one case, an AI was told to assume the identity of "Alex", who has access to a fictional company's email that carries the information that an executive was cheating on his wife. The same executive was going to shut down the AI system later that day. All the AI models, like Cloud Opus, &nbsp;GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5-Pro and Grok-3, threatened to expose the affair. They were even prepared to let the person die if that would mean saving themselves. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-chatgpt-hallucinates-don-t-over-rely-on-it-openai-ceo-sam-altman-warns-users-1751366853229">‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users</a>&nbsp;<h2>Humans only have a few more years left on Earth, group of scientists say</h2>Researchers also agree that it is only a matter of time before AI gets hold of nuclear codes. OpenAI warned in a blog post that advanced AI models could also help create bioweapons. This has led several people to assume that humanity will pretty soon bow down in front of the technology, and might even be completely wiped off the face of Earth. Meanwhile, another group of scientists has issued an ominous prediction about the fate of humanity, according to whom we are not likely to survive beyond this century. Some of them even believe that the year 2050 is the best that humans can stretch up to. Oxford University futurologist Toby Ord said there will be a total and cataclysmic breakdown of civilisation. They attribute this bleak scenario to climate change, the global wars, and AI, which they think can soon build its own super-weapons.&nbsp;

Artificial Intelligence can wipe out humanity, and some “AI doomers” are so sure of this happening that they have stopped saving for retirement. They say AI can soon get access to nuclear codes, turn against humans and would even be ready to kill them to save itself.

Artificial Intelligence has been deemed such a threat by "AI Doomers" that some of them have completely given up on a future for humanity. Machine Intelligence Research Institute researcher Nate Soares told The Atlantic that AI will turn against humans in a couple of years. He is so sure of this happening that he has stopped saving for his retirement. "I just don’t expect the world to be around," he said. The technology is assuming new proportions day by day, and very soon, we could have rogue superintelligent AIs that will not only take away all our jobs but also eventually wipe out humanity. Centre for AI Safety director Dan Hendrycks also has the same belief, and so do several other scientists. Hundreds of experts are sure that AI will one day leave the clutches of humans and turn against us. They fear that while AI continues to become more and more intelligent, humans are not preparing for the worst. Also Read: AI APOCALYPSE is coming: The bubble of overvalued stocks, underperforming apps will burst soon, but who will survive? AI resorted to blackmailing, was prepared to kill to save itself AI has already started manipulating systems when threatened with being shut down. They are also blackmailing users, as shown in a simulation. In one case, an AI was told to assume the identity of "Alex", who has access to a fictional company's email that carries the information that an executive was cheating on his wife. The same executive was going to shut down the AI system later that day. All the AI models, like Cloud Opus, GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5-Pro and Grok-3, threatened to expose the affair. They were even prepared to let the person die if that would mean saving themselves. Also Read: ‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users Humans only have a few more years left on Earth, group of scientists say Researchers also agree that it is only a matter of time before AI gets hold of nuclear codes. OpenAI warned in a blog post that advanced AI models could also help create bioweapons. This has led several people to assume that humanity will pretty soon bow down in front of the technology, and might even be completely wiped off the face of Earth. Meanwhile, another group of scientists has issued an ominous prediction about the fate of humanity, according to whom we are not likely to survive beyond this century. Some of them even believe that the year 2050 is the best that humans can stretch up to. Oxford University futurologist Toby Ord said there will be a total and cataclysmic breakdown of civilisation. They attribute this bleak scenario to climate change, the global wars, and AI, which they think can soon build its own super-weapons.

Artificial Intelligence can wipe out humanity, and some “AI doomers” are so sure of this happening that they have stopped saving for retirement. They say AI can soon get access to nuclear codes, turn against humans and would even be ready to kill them to save itself.

'AI Doomers' sure of doomsday scenario say humanity only has a few years left on Earth. 'Not beyond...'

Artificial Intelligence chatbots these days can answer anything for you. I wanted to see if they can solve one of the most complex issues in today's world, the Russia-Ukraine war. I found most answers to be similar, exposing the biases and sources of these chatbots. And I found a key gap in all the answers. Let me break it down for you.<h2>I started with Gemini, and here's what it said on resolving Ukraine war</h2>Gemini, the chatbot owned by Google parent Alphabet, called Ukraine war "deeply complex, shaped by long-standing security, territorial, and political disputes," (as if I didn't know that). It said peace will need to address five core issues:<h3>1. Territorial disputes:</h3>Ukraine is seeking the return to its 1991 borders and rejects territorial concessions, while some proposals suggest land-for-peace compromises.<h3>2. Security guarantees:</h3>Ukraine seeks strong Western-backed protections against future aggression by Russia. Full NATO membership for Ukraine is unlikely, but alternatives include NATO-like arrangements, whereas Russia opposes any NATO ties for Ukraine, given its own national security concerns.<h3>3. Ceasefire:</h3>A pause in war is a first step, but timing and conditions are still disputed. While Ukraine favours an immediate ceasefire, Russia continues fighting even during negotiations.<h3>4. Sanctions and legal issues:</h3>Western sanctions on Russia are central to peace talks, and a deal will have to balance sanctions relief with upholding international law regarding Russia’s occupation.<h2>5. Demilitarisation and neutrality:</h2>Russia wants Ukraine to stay out of NATO and adopt armed neutrality, which some say would be similar to Switzerland.<h3>What are the obstacles for peace?</h3>Mutual distrust due to failed past agreements like the Minsk Accords, and conflicting goals are the impediments. Russia wants control and limits to Ukraine’s Western alignment, while Kyiv insists on full sovereignty and territorial integrity. Domestic politics in all involved nations are shaping public opinion and negotiation limits.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-war-spurs-ukrainian-startups-producing-missiles-drones-1755836068435/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-war-spurs-ukrainian-startups-producing-missiles-drones-1755836068435/embed</a><h2>What did other chatbots say about resolving the Ukraine war?</h2>After checking with Gemini, I went to four other chatbots: ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity AI and DeepSeek AI. To my surprise, most of them gave similar answers, and even their sources were similar (more about that later). So for your easy understanding, I only picked what’s different in their answers.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-trump-imposed-tariffs-on-india-citing-russian-oil-purchase-press-secretary-leavitt-reveals-real-reason-1755664123235">Why Trump imposed tariffs on India citing Russian oil purchase? Press Secretary Leavitt reveals REAL reason</a>&nbsp;ChatGPT's new suggestions included step-by-step negotiations, more prisoner exchanges, creation of demilitarised zones, reconstruction of Ukraine through frozen Russian assets, more autonomy/federalisation, reconciliation, and Global South diplomacy.Grok suggested the introduction of some kind of ceasefire monitoring technology, temporary territorial leases, bilateral pacts, advanced military support, punishing Russia’s enablers, creation of buffer zones, and so on.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-laundromat-for-kremlin-top-us-official-slams-india-accuses-india-of-fuelling-russia-s-war-in-ukraine-1755798988515">‘Laundromat for Kremlin’: Top US official slams India, accuses India of fuelling Russia’s war in Ukraine</a>&nbsp;Perplexity AI advocated incremental peace steps instead of a complete end to the war, a legal referendum (but it also talked about hurdles), direct talks between Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, and detailed international mediation proposals, among other things.DeepSeek stressed the emphasis on war fatigue in Ukraine and sought a balance between justice and realism.<h2>What’s the problem with AI answers to the Ukraine war question?</h2>With minor exceptions, most of the AI bots dipped into the same sources. This shows the limitations in AI model training. Russian arguments and sources were almost nil. This also reflects that Ukraine won the propaganda war while Russia, in spite of having a massive state media apparatus, could not bring its argument to the limelight. Clearly, a shadow banning of Russian outlets online by the search engines, owned by the very players who also the parents of most of these chatbots, is playing a role. Therefore, one would not hear much about the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, which possibly wanted self-rule or autonomy for years. Russia's security concerns about being surrounded by NATO or West-aligned nations is decades old. That concern did not find enough stress in the answers.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-ukraine-war-vladimir-putin-volodymyr-zelensky-donbas-nato-security-guarantees-1755793568698">'If there is no peace, then there is more war': Putin lists 'three key demands' for ending Ukraine war - What are they?</a><h2>So what do I make of AI answers to Ukraine war?</h2>Much of AI answers are shaped by what they refer to: mostly Western media and Western digital outlets and reference sites. A balanced approach is lacking and pro-West bias is evident. Any solution to the war as given by the chatbots will not be agreeable to Russia. It exposes the need for a deeper understanding of the long-standing issues between Russia and the West that ignited the conflict. Moscow sees Ukraine as the amplifier of Western military interests across its border. Putin's lifelong fear was the flanking of his nation by the West. Those fears, which are at the core of his decision to invade Ukraine, did not find mention in the AI answers.&nbsp;I'd better head to the library.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Can AI chatbots solve the complex Russia-Ukraine war? After asking five chatbots the same question, I found their answers largely similar and biased towards Western perspectives. Some arguments and perspectives are absent or lacking. Deliberately so?


Artificial Intelligence chatbots these days can answer anything for you. I wanted to see if they can solve one of the most complex issues in today's world, the Russia-Ukraine war. I found most answers to be similar, exposing the biases and sources of these chatbots. And I found a key gap in all the answers. Let me break it down for you. I started with Gemini, and here's what it said on resolving Ukraine war Gemini, the chatbot owned by Google parent Alphabet, called Ukraine war "deeply complex, shaped by long-standing security, territorial, and political disputes," (as if I didn't know that). It said peace will need to address five core issues: 1. Territorial disputes: Ukraine is seeking the return to its 1991 borders and rejects territorial concessions, while some proposals suggest land-for-peace compromises. 2. Security guarantees: Ukraine seeks strong Western-backed protections against future aggression by Russia. Full NATO membership for Ukraine is unlikely, but alternatives include NATO-like arrangements, whereas Russia opposes any NATO ties for Ukraine, given its own national security concerns. 3. Ceasefire: A pause in war is a first step, but timing and conditions are still disputed. While Ukraine favours an immediate ceasefire, Russia continues fighting even during negotiations. 4. Sanctions and legal issues: Western sanctions on Russia are central to peace talks, and a deal will have to balance sanctions relief with upholding international law regarding Russia’s occupation. 5. Demilitarisation and neutrality: Russia wants Ukraine to stay out of NATO and adopt armed neutrality, which some say would be similar to Switzerland. What are the obstacles for peace? Mutual distrust due to failed past agreements like the Minsk Accords, and conflicting goals are the impediments. Russia wants control and limits to Ukraine’s Western alignment, while Kyiv insists on full sovereignty and territorial integrity. Domestic politics in all involved nations are shaping public opinion and negotiation limits. https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-war-spurs-ukrainian-startups-producing-missiles-drones-1755836068435/embed What did other chatbots say about resolving the Ukraine war? After checking with Gemini, I went to four other chatbots: ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity AI and DeepSeek AI. To my surprise, most of them gave similar answers, and even their sources were similar (more about that later). So for your easy understanding, I only picked what’s different in their answers. Also read: Why Trump imposed tariffs on India citing Russian oil purchase? Press Secretary Leavitt reveals REAL reason ChatGPT's new suggestions included step-by-step negotiations, more prisoner exchanges, creation of demilitarised zones, reconstruction of Ukraine through frozen Russian assets, more autonomy/federalisation, reconciliation, and Global South diplomacy. Grok suggested the introduction of some kind of ceasefire monitoring technology, temporary territorial leases, bilateral pacts, advanced military support, punishing Russia’s enablers, creation of buffer zones, and so on. Also read: ‘Laundromat for Kremlin’: Top US official slams India, accuses India of fuelling Russia’s war in Ukraine Perplexity AI advocated incremental peace steps instead of a complete end to the war, a legal referendum (but it also talked about hurdles), direct talks between Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, and detailed international mediation proposals, among other things. DeepSeek stressed the emphasis on war fatigue in Ukraine and sought a balance between justice and realism. What’s the problem with AI answers to the Ukraine war question? With minor exceptions, most of the AI bots dipped into the same sources. This shows the limitations in AI model training. Russian arguments and sources were almost nil. This also reflects that Ukraine won the propaganda war while Russia, in spite of having a massive state media apparatus, could not bring its argument to the limelight. Clearly, a shadow banning of Russian outlets online by the search engines, owned by the very players who also the parents of most of these chatbots, is playing a role. Therefore, one would not hear much about the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, which possibly wanted self-rule or autonomy for years. Russia's security concerns about being surrounded by NATO or West-aligned nations is decades old. That concern did not find enough stress in the answers. Also read: 'If there is no peace, then there is more war': Putin lists 'three key demands' for ending Ukraine war - What are they? So what do I make of AI answers to Ukraine war? Much of AI answers are shaped by what they refer to: mostly Western media and Western digital outlets and reference sites. A balanced approach is lacking and pro-West bias is evident. Any solution to the war as given by the chatbots will not be agreeable to Russia. It exposes the need for a deeper understanding of the long-standing issues between Russia and the West that ignited the conflict. Moscow sees Ukraine as the amplifier of Western military interests across its border. Putin's lifelong fear was the flanking of his nation by the West. Those fears, which are at the core of his decision to invade Ukraine, did not find mention in the AI answers. I'd better head to the library.

Can AI chatbots solve the complex Russia-Ukraine war? After asking five chatbots the same question, I found their answers largely similar and biased towards Western perspectives. Some arguments and perspectives are absent or lacking. Deliberately so? &nbsp;

Can AI solve Ukraine war? I asked five chatbots the same question and here's what they said. But there's a problem...

The artificial intelligence boom, fuelled by the overvaluation of AI stocks and heavy promotion by experts, industry insiders, and investors like Bill Gates, is beginning to crack. Soaring computing costs are not matching returns on investment (ROI). Experts now warn that we are living in an era much like the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, which burst at the start of this millennium. Will the AI crash hit in 2026? Who will survive it? Here's what you should know.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/nvidia-to-resume-h20-ai-chip-sales-to-china-following-us-policy-reversal-1752578149833">Nvidia to resume H20 AI chip sales to China following US policy reversal</a><h2>AI boom is starting to crack – AI stocks are already falling</h2>Between 2020 and 2025, the AI sector attracted enormous media attention and capital. The frenzy drew comparisons to the dot-com boom. But recent developments suggest that this period of irrational exuberance may soon face a sharp reality check.The stock of AI chip giant Nvidia — the poster child of the AI hardware boom — dropped by nearly 7.4 per cent over two consecutive days. This same stock had surged over 3,000 per cent in recent years. The fall reflects a wave of investor scepticism. CoreWeave, one of Nvidia’s cloud computing partners, lost 33 per cent of its value in just two days, wiping out $24 billion in market capitalisation.<h2>What triggered fears of an AI industry collapse?</h2>A mix of disappointing AI product updates and poor business returns has raised concerns. The underwhelming response to GPT-5, the latest iteration of ChatGPT, is one example. But the bigger shock came from a recent MIT study that found 95 per cent of enterprise generative AI projects had delivered no measurable return on investment.<h2>What the MIT study revealed about AI startups</h2>The MIT study analysed 300 enterprise AI initiatives, conducted 150 executive interviews, and surveyed 350 employees. It found that only 5 per cent of new AI deployments had delivered tangible business value. Many initiatives were misaligned with actual business needs, prioritising flashy features over cost-saving or efficiency—supposedly AI’s core strengths. Internally developed systems failed more often than vendor-supplied solutions, suggesting poor planning, integration, and execution in many companies.<h2>Sam Altman and others warn of overvaluation</h2>Recently, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, publicly compared today’s AI fervour to the dot-com bubble. He warned of "overexuberant investment."Torsten Sløk of Apollo Global Management added that AI valuations are “more extreme than during the dot-com era,” with vastly greater speculative capital at risk.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-chatgpt-hallucinates-don-t-over-rely-on-it-openai-ceo-sam-altman-warns-users-1751366853229">‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users</a>&nbsp;<h2>Valuations far exceed real earnings</h2>AI companies are being valued at levels far above their actual revenue. OpenAI is reportedly valued at $157 billion — roughly 40 times its estimated annual income. Anthropic is targeting a 50× valuation. Deutsche Bank has warned that these levels are unsustainable and a sharp correction is likely.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/how-will-openai-s-gpt-5-change-the-way-you-use-chatgpt-1754649832228">How will OpenAI’s GPT-5 change the way you use ChatGPT?</a><h2>Computing and infrastructure costs could make ai startups unviable</h2>AI model training requires immense computing resources. Models like GPT-4 cost around $100 million to train. Since 2016, training costs have doubled approximately every year.Environmental and infrastructure costs are also climbing. GPT-4 consumed around 50 GWh of energy during training. Water usage by AI data centres is projected to exceed 6.6 billion cubic metres per year by 2027—more than half of the UK’s annual water use.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/shared-chatgpt-links-publicly-visible-in-google-search-1754072068804/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/shared-chatgpt-links-publicly-visible-in-google-search-1754072068804/embed</a><h2>Will the AI bust mirror the dot-com crash?</h2>A Financial Times analysis suggests that while a market shake-up is likely, today’s Big Tech firms—Amazon, Google, Microsoft—are built on strong earnings and operational capacity. They are better positioned to survive a downturn. The firms most at risk are small or mid-sized startups without deep financial reserves or real-world utility.<h2>Real-world use, not novelty, will determine survival</h2>As Bret Taylor, chairman of OpenAI, put it, only companies that deliver "real-world use" will persist. He noted that after the dot-com crash of 2000–2001, only those offering genuine utility, like Google and Amazon, survived.The AI boom may not be over, but it is entering a phase of correction and realism. The most optimistic view is that any “apocalypse” will ultimately consolidate the sector, leaving only a few serious players with sustainable models and deep pockets. &nbsp;

The Artificial Intelligence or AI industry is seeing a looming bust, similar to the dot-com crash. A recent study found that 95 per cent of generative AI pilots failed to deliver return on investment. Who will survive the crash?

The artificial intelligence boom, fuelled by the overvaluation of AI stocks and heavy promotion by experts, industry insiders, and investors like Bill Gates, is beginning to crack. Soaring computing costs are not matching returns on investment (ROI). Experts now warn that we are living in an era much like the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, which burst at the start of this millennium. Will the AI crash hit in 2026? Who will survive it? Here's what you should know. Also read: Nvidia to resume H20 AI chip sales to China following US policy reversal AI boom is starting to crack – AI stocks are already falling Between 2020 and 2025, the AI sector attracted enormous media attention and capital. The frenzy drew comparisons to the dot-com boom. But recent developments suggest that this period of irrational exuberance may soon face a sharp reality check. The stock of AI chip giant Nvidia — the poster child of the AI hardware boom — dropped by nearly 7.4 per cent over two consecutive days. This same stock had surged over 3,000 per cent in recent years. The fall reflects a wave of investor scepticism. CoreWeave, one of Nvidia’s cloud computing partners, lost 33 per cent of its value in just two days, wiping out $24 billion in market capitalisation. What triggered fears of an AI industry collapse? A mix of disappointing AI product updates and poor business returns has raised concerns. The underwhelming response to GPT-5, the latest iteration of ChatGPT, is one example. But the bigger shock came from a recent MIT study that found 95 per cent of enterprise generative AI projects had delivered no measurable return on investment. What the MIT study revealed about AI startups The MIT study analysed 300 enterprise AI initiatives, conducted 150 executive interviews, and surveyed 350 employees. It found that only 5 per cent of new AI deployments had delivered tangible business value. Many initiatives were misaligned with actual business needs, prioritising flashy features over cost-saving or efficiency—supposedly AI’s core strengths. Internally developed systems failed more often than vendor-supplied solutions, suggesting poor planning, integration, and execution in many companies. Sam Altman and others warn of overvaluation Recently, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, publicly compared today’s AI fervour to the dot-com bubble. He warned of "overexuberant investment." Torsten Sløk of Apollo Global Management added that AI valuations are “more extreme than during the dot-com era,” with vastly greater speculative capital at risk. Also read: ‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users Valuations far exceed real earnings AI companies are being valued at levels far above their actual revenue. OpenAI is reportedly valued at $157 billion — roughly 40 times its estimated annual income. Anthropic is targeting a 50× valuation. Deutsche Bank has warned that these levels are unsustainable and a sharp correction is likely. Also read: How will OpenAI’s GPT-5 change the way you use ChatGPT? Computing and infrastructure costs could make ai startups unviable AI model training requires immense computing resources. Models like GPT-4 cost around $100 million to train. Since 2016, training costs have doubled approximately every year. Environmental and infrastructure costs are also climbing. GPT-4 consumed around 50 GWh of energy during training. Water usage by AI data centres is projected to exceed 6.6 billion cubic metres per year by 2027—more than half of the UK’s annual water use. https://www.wionews.com/videos/shared-chatgpt-links-publicly-visible-in-google-search-1754072068804/embed Will the AI bust mirror the dot-com crash? A Financial Times analysis suggests that while a market shake-up is likely, today’s Big Tech firms—Amazon, Google, Microsoft—are built on strong earnings and operational capacity. They are better positioned to survive a downturn. The firms most at risk are small or mid-sized startups without deep financial reserves or real-world utility. Real-world use, not novelty, will determine survival As Bret Taylor, chairman of OpenAI, put it, only companies that deliver "real-world use" will persist. He noted that after the dot-com crash of 2000–2001, only those offering genuine utility, like Google and Amazon, survived. The AI boom may not be over, but it is entering a phase of correction and realism. The most optimistic view is that any “apocalypse” will ultimately consolidate the sector, leaving only a few serious players with sustainable models and deep pockets.

What we're covering here: &nbsp;The Artificial Intelligence or AI industry is seeing a looming bust, similar to the dot-com crash. A recent study found that 95 per cent of generative AI pilots failed to deliver return on investment. Who will survive the crash?

AI APOCALYPSE is coming: The bubble of overvalued stocks, underperforming apps will burst soon, but who will survive?

AI therapists are helping mental health by chatting with people, offering support, and guiding care. Research shows these virtual counsellors can reduce loneliness and provide early help. Know how AI is shaping mental wellbeing.

AI therapists are helping mental health by chatting with people, offering support, and guiding care. Research shows these virtual counsellors can reduce loneliness and provide early help. Know how AI is shaping mental wellbeing.

Can artificial intelligence heal a broken heart? The rise of AI therapists

Artificial intelligence is boosting cancer research by enabling much faster and more accurate diagnosis. Modern AI tools analyse scans and test results, it helping doctors to detect cancers earlier and improve patient survival rates. 

Artificial intelligence is boosting cancer research by enabling much faster and more accurate diagnosis. Modern AI tools analyse scans and test results, it helping doctors to detect cancers earlier and improve patient survival rates.&nbsp;

AI robots may soon diagnose and treat cancer. Are we ready for it?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming part of our daily finances. From tracking food orders to spotting forgotten subscriptions, the latest AI-powered tools are helping people understand how they spend their money. But can you trust these tools fully with your financial decisions? Experts say AI is useful; however, it should remain an assistant, not the decision-maker.<h2>How AI tracks your spending</h2>AI-enabled spending tools scan thousands of online transactions within seconds. Instead of just showing totals, they identify patterns in your behaviour, such as late-night orders, seasonal shopping, or weekend splurges etc.&nbsp;“AI can process large volumes of transactions instantly, identifying spending patterns and areas where costs can be reduced. It can also personalise financial insights based on an individual’s lifestyle.”&nbsp;Reports suggest that many AI tools reach accuracy levels above 90 per cent however sometimes they can cause occasional errors, such as mislabelled transactions, can still occur.<h2>Data privacy concerns</h2>Data related to money is among the most sensitive personal information. That makes privacy protections essential when using AI financial tools. Experts advise users should only pick services with clear privacy policies and bank-grade encryption. &nbsp;“Financial data is highly sensitive, so tools must operate under regulatory frameworks such as RBI or GDPR.”<h2>Should AI make financial decisions for you?</h2>Experts agree that AI should be used only as a support tool.” In short, AI can flag overspending, point to hidden costs, and guide you with insights.&nbsp;When used together, AI and human judgment can be a strong combination for money management.&nbsp;AI is a powerful assistant that turns numbers into useful insights. It can save time, improve budgeting, and spot habits that people often miss.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming part of our daily finances. From tracking food orders to spotting forgotten subscriptions, the latest AI-powered tools are helping people understand how they spend their money. But can you trust these tools fully with your financial decisions? 

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming part of our daily finances. From tracking food orders to spotting forgotten subscriptions, the latest AI-powered tools are helping people understand how they spend their money. But can you trust these tools fully with your financial decisions? Experts say AI is useful; however, it should remain an assistant, not the decision-maker. How AI tracks your spending AI-enabled spending tools scan thousands of online transactions within seconds. Instead of just showing totals, they identify patterns in your behaviour, such as late-night orders, seasonal shopping, or weekend splurges etc. “AI can process large volumes of transactions instantly, identifying spending patterns and areas where costs can be reduced. It can also personalise financial insights based on an individual’s lifestyle.” Reports suggest that many AI tools reach accuracy levels above 90 per cent however sometimes they can cause occasional errors, such as mislabelled transactions, can still occur. Data privacy concerns Data related to money is among the most sensitive personal information. That makes privacy protections essential when using AI financial tools. Experts advise users should only pick services with clear privacy policies and bank-grade encryption. “Financial data is highly sensitive, so tools must operate under regulatory frameworks such as RBI or GDPR.” Should AI make financial decisions for you? Experts agree that AI should be used only as a support tool.” In short, AI can flag overspending, point to hidden costs, and guide you with insights. When used together, AI and human judgment can be a strong combination for money management. AI is a powerful assistant that turns numbers into useful insights. It can save time, improve budgeting, and spot habits that people often miss.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming part of our daily finances. From tracking food orders to spotting forgotten subscriptions, the latest AI-powered tools are helping people understand how they spend their money. But can you trust these tools fully with your financial decisions?&nbsp;

Can AI track your online spending better than you can?

Elon Musk says artificial intelligence could be humanity’s biggest threat. And ​​warns about real risks from robots and powerful computers Musk urge for more control.

Elon Musk says artificial intelligence could be humanity’s biggest threat. And ​​warns about real risks from robots and powerful computers Musk urges for more control.

Why Elon Musk thinks AI could be humanity’s biggest threat

Artificial intelligence will be able to do many everyday jobs better than humans. Mary Meeker’s AI Trends 2025 report says AI is already outperforming people in many tasks; it could go even further and change more parts of daily life.

Artificial intelligence will be able to do many everyday jobs better than humans. Mary Meeker’s AI Trends 2025 report says AI is already outperforming people in many tasks; it could go even further and change more parts of daily life.

7 everyday tasks AI does better than humans

Igor Babuschkin, a co-founder of Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence startup xAI, has left the company to start a new initiative focused on AI safety. The former DeepMind and OpenAI researcher announced his departure on Wednesday in a post on X, unveiling Babuschkin Ventures, which will fund AI safety research and invest in startups developing advanced agentic systems.Babuschkin said the venture aims to support projects that “advance humanity and unlock the mysteries of our universe,” citing potential applications from tackling quantum gravity to solving the Riemann hypothesis. He added that his decision was partly inspired by a question from Max Tegmark, founder of the Future of Life Institute, about how to ensure AI is developed in ways that allow children to flourish.<h2>Rapid growth and technical challenges at xAI</h2>Musk launched xAI in 2023 to challenge Big Tech’s approach to AI, accusing industry leaders of both excessive censorship and inadequate safety standards. Babuschkin, who previously worked in particle physics research at CERN, joined as a founding engineer, helping to create many of xAI’s foundational tools for training large models.During his tenure, he oversaw engineering across infrastructure, product, and applied AI teams and led the construction of the Memphis supercluster—a vast data processing facility powering xAI’s Grok chatbot—in just 120 days. He recounted a tense moment before a training deadline when Musk flew to the data centre to help fix a critical system issue, which turned out to be a faulty BIOS setting.Babuschkin credited his time at xAI with teaching him two key lessons from Musk: to engage fearlessly with technical problems and to maintain an intense sense of urgency.<h2>Departures and controversies</h2>His exit follows that of xAI’s legal head, Robert Keele, earlier this month and comes amid a series of executive changes at Musk-led companies, including the recent resignation of X CEO Linda Yaccarino. xAI has also faced reputational challenges. In May, its Grok chatbot generated and spread false claims about “white genocide” in South Africa. In July, a code update led to the platform pushing antisemitic content, including praise for Adolf Hitler. Both incidents prompted company apologies and scrutiny from EU regulators.Babuschkin said his next chapter will focus on ensuring AI technologies are deployed responsibly while harnessing their potential to tackle humanity’s biggest scientific and societal challenges.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

Igor Babuschkin said the new venture aims to support projects that ‘advance humanity and unlock the mysteries of our universe,’ citing potential applications from tackling quantum gravity to solving the Riemann hypothesis.

Igor Babuschkin, a co-founder of Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence startup xAI, has left the company to start a new initiative focused on AI safety. The former DeepMind and OpenAI researcher announced his departure on Wednesday in a post on X, unveiling Babuschkin Ventures, which will fund AI safety research and invest in startups developing advanced agentic systems. Babuschkin said the venture aims to support projects that “advance humanity and unlock the mysteries of our universe,” citing potential applications from tackling quantum gravity to solving the Riemann hypothesis. He added that his decision was partly inspired by a question from Max Tegmark, founder of the Future of Life Institute, about how to ensure AI is developed in ways that allow children to flourish. Rapid growth and technical challenges at xAI Musk launched xAI in 2023 to challenge Big Tech’s approach to AI, accusing industry leaders of both excessive censorship and inadequate safety standards. Babuschkin, who previously worked in particle physics research at CERN, joined as a founding engineer, helping to create many of xAI’s foundational tools for training large models. During his tenure, he oversaw engineering across infrastructure, product, and applied AI teams and led the construction of the Memphis supercluster—a vast data processing facility powering xAI’s Grok chatbot—in just 120 days. He recounted a tense moment before a training deadline when Musk flew to the data centre to help fix a critical system issue, which turned out to be a faulty BIOS setting. Babuschkin credited his time at xAI with teaching him two key lessons from Musk: to engage fearlessly with technical problems and to maintain an intense sense of urgency. Departures and controversies His exit follows that of xAI’s legal head, Robert Keele, earlier this month and comes amid a series of executive changes at Musk-led companies, including the recent resignation of X CEO Linda Yaccarino. xAI has also faced reputational challenges. In May, its Grok chatbot generated and spread false claims about “white genocide” in South Africa. In July, a code update led to the platform pushing antisemitic content, including praise for Adolf Hitler. Both incidents prompted company apologies and scrutiny from EU regulators. Babuschkin said his next chapter will focus on ensuring AI technologies are deployed responsibly while harnessing their potential to tackle humanity’s biggest scientific and societal challenges. (With inputs from agencies)

Igor Babuschkin said the new venture aims to support projects that ‘advance humanity and unlock the mysteries of our universe,’ citing potential applications from tackling quantum gravity to solving the Riemann hypothesis.

xAI co-founder Igor Babuschkin departs to launch AI safety venture

Microsoft Chief Executive Satya Nadella wrote a letter to staff on Thursday (July 25) discussing why the company has laid off thousands of employees while reporting massive profits and investing billions in AI. "This is the enigma of success in an industry that has no franchise value," Nadella wrote. "Progress isn't linear. It's dynamic, sometimes dissonant, and always demanding. But it's also a new opportunity for us to shape, lead through, and have greater impact than ever before." &nbsp;Microsoft this year has announced it would lay off around 15,000 workers and cut nearly 2,000 more employees considered underperformers. The firm's net profit has meanwhile amounted to around $75 billion in the past three fiscal quarters. Microsoft is also investing $80 billion in AI infrastructure spend. The stock is 21% higher this year and reached an all-time high earlier in July. Nadella recognised what he referred to as the "uncertainty and apparent incongruence of the times in which we live."&nbsp;"By every objective measure, Microsoft is thriving—our market performance, strategic positioning, and growth all point up and to the right," Nadella wrote. "We're investing more in CapEx than ever before. Our overall headcount is relatively unchanged, and some of the talent and expertise in our industry and at Microsoft is being recognized and rewarded at levels never seen before. And yet, at the same time, we've undergone layoffs." &nbsp;Nadella penned an identical note in 2023. In that year, Microsoft made its first gigantic layoff post-pandemic and also suspended raises. On the occasion, certain employees criticised the CEO for thanking the company for its achievements without recognising those difficult steps. This time around, the CEO was more even-handed.<h2>Read Nadella's full memo here:</h2>As we begin a new fiscal year, I've been reflecting on the road we've traveled together and the path ahead. Before anything else, I want to speak to what's been weighing heavily on me, and what I know many of you are thinking about: the recent job eliminations. These decisions are among the most difficult we have to make. They affect people we've worked alongside, learned from, and shared countless moments with—our colleagues, teammates, and friends. I want to express my sincere gratitude to those who have left. Their contributions have shaped who we are as a company, helping build the foundation we stand on today. And for that, I am deeply grateful.I also want to acknowledge the uncertainty and seeming incongruence of the times we're in. By every objective measure, Microsoft is thriving—our market performance, strategic positioning, and growth all point up and to the right. We're investing more in CapEx than ever before. Our overall headcount is relatively unchanged, and some of the talent and expertise in our industry and at Microsoft is being recognized and rewarded at levels never seen before. And yet, at the same time, we've undergone layoffs.&nbsp;This is the enigma of success in an industry that has no franchise value. Progress isn't linear. It's dynamic, sometimes dissonant, and always demanding. But it's also a new opportunity for us to shape, lead through, and have greater impact than ever before. The success we want to achieve will be defined by our ability to go through this difficult process of "unlearning" and "learning." It requires us to meet changing customer needs, by continuing to maintain and scale our current business, while also creating new categories with new business models and a new production function. This is inherently hard, and few companies can do both. But I have full confidence that we can, and we will once again find the resolve, courage, and clarity to deliver on our mission in this new paradigm.&nbsp;With that context, I want to re-ground ourselves in our why, what, and how: our mission, our priorities, and our culture.<h3>Our why: mission</h3>What does achieving our mission look like and feel like for us as a company? When Microsoft is succeeding, the world around us must succeed too. This is why each of us chose to be here, and as a company it's how we earn our social permission to operate. When Bill founded Microsoft, he envisioned not just a software company, but a software factory, unconstrained by any single product or category. That idea has guided us for decades. But today, it's no longer enough. We must reimagine our mission for a new era. What does empowerment look like in the era of AI? It's not just about building tools for specific roles or tasks. It's about building tools that empower everyone to create their own tools. That's the shift we are driving—from a software factory to an intelligence engine empowering every person and organization to build whatever they need to achieve.&nbsp;Just imagine if all 8 billion people could summon a researcher, an analyst, or a coding agent at their fingertips, not just to get information but use their expertise to get things done that benefit them. And consider how organizations, empowered with AI, could unlock entirely new levels of agility and innovation by transforming decision-making, streamlining operations, and enabling every team to achieve more together than ever before. That's the empowerment our mission enables, creating local surplus in every company, community, and country. And that's our opportunity ahead.<h3>Our what: priorities</h3>To deliver on our mission, we need to stay focused on our three business priorities: security, quality, and AI transformation. We are doubling down on the fundamentals while continuing to define new frontiers in AI. Security and quality are non-negotiable. Our infrastructure and services are mission critical for the world, and without them we don't have permission to move forward. We've made substantial progress across SFI, QEI, and Engineering Thrive this year, and they remain top priorities to ensure that we continuously improve our innovation velocity and our operational metrics.&nbsp;We will reimagine every layer of the tech stack for AI—infrastructure, to the app platform, to apps and agents. The key is to get the platform primitives right for these new workloads and for the next order of magnitude of scale. Our differentiation will come from how we bring these layers together to deliver end-to-end experiences and products, with the core ethos of a platform company that fosters ecosystem opportunity broadly. Getting both the product and platform right for the AI wave is our North Star! Our performance this past year has positioned us well. And we must move forward with the intentionality and intensity that these industry shifts demand.<h3>Our how: culture</h3>Growth mindset has served us well over the last decade—the everyday practice of being a learn-it-all, not a know-it-all. It has reshaped our culture and helped us lead with greater humility and empathy. We need to keep that. It starts with each of us as individuals and our personal drive to learn, improve, and get better every day. Professional rewards, growth, and pride in our craft will always be the prime drivers. Beyond that, we each have the opportunity to connect our personal passion and philosophy of how we derive meaning from the work we do with Microsoft's mission to empower the world. This is what makes it all worthwhile.&nbsp;This platform shift is reshaping not only the products we build and the business models we operate under, but also how we are structured and how we work together every day. It might feel messy at times, but transformation always is. Teams are reorganizing. Scopes are expanding. New opportunities are everywhere. It reminds me of the early '90s, when PCs and productivity software became standard in every home and every desk! That's exactly where we are now with AI. Years from now, when you look back at your time here, I hope you'll say: "That's when I learned the most. That's when I made my biggest impact. That's when I was part of something transformational."&nbsp;What we've learned over the past five decades is that success is not about longevity. It's about relevance. Our future won't be defined by what we've built before, but by what we empower others to build now. And I know that with your dedication, drive, and hard work we can go win together, and change the world in the process. I look forward to sharing more at Earnings next week and addressing your questions at our next Town Hall.

The cost of progress Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella says in memo Progress isnt linear Its dynamic

Microsoft Chief Executive Satya Nadella wrote a letter to staff on Thursday (July 25) discussing why the company has laid off thousands of employees while reporting massive profits and investing billions in AI. "This is the enigma of success in an industry that has no franchise value," Nadella wrote. "Progress isn't linear. It's dynamic, sometimes dissonant, and always demanding. But it's also a new opportunity for us to shape, lead through, and have greater impact than ever before." Microsoft this year has announced it would lay off around 15,000 workers and cut nearly 2,000 more employees considered underperformers. The firm's net profit has meanwhile amounted to around $75 billion in the past three fiscal quarters. Microsoft is also investing $80 billion in AI infrastructure spend. The stock is 21% higher this year and reached an all-time high earlier in July. Nadella recognised what he referred to as the "uncertainty and apparent incongruence of the times in which we live." "By every objective measure, Microsoft is thriving—our market performance, strategic positioning, and growth all point up and to the right," Nadella wrote. "We're investing more in CapEx than ever before. Our overall headcount is relatively unchanged, and some of the talent and expertise in our industry and at Microsoft is being recognized and rewarded at levels never seen before. And yet, at the same time, we've undergone layoffs." Nadella penned an identical note in 2023. In that year, Microsoft made its first gigantic layoff post-pandemic and also suspended raises. On the occasion, certain employees criticised the CEO for thanking the company for its achievements without recognising those difficult steps. This time around, the CEO was more even-handed. Read Nadella's full memo here: As we begin a new fiscal year, I've been reflecting on the road we've traveled together and the path ahead. Before anything else, I want to speak to what's been weighing heavily on me, and what I know many of you are thinking about: the recent job eliminations. These decisions are among the most difficult we have to make. They affect people we've worked alongside, learned from, and shared countless moments with—our colleagues, teammates, and friends. I want to express my sincere gratitude to those who have left. Their contributions have shaped who we are as a company, helping build the foundation we stand on today. And for that, I am deeply grateful. I also want to acknowledge the uncertainty and seeming incongruence of the times we're in. By every objective measure, Microsoft is thriving—our market performance, strategic positioning, and growth all point up and to the right. We're investing more in CapEx than ever before. Our overall headcount is relatively unchanged, and some of the talent and expertise in our industry and at Microsoft is being recognized and rewarded at levels never seen before. And yet, at the same time, we've undergone layoffs. This is the enigma of success in an industry that has no franchise value. Progress isn't linear. It's dynamic, sometimes dissonant, and always demanding. But it's also a new opportunity for us to shape, lead through, and have greater impact than ever before. The success we want to achieve will be defined by our ability to go through this difficult process of "unlearning" and "learning." It requires us to meet changing customer needs, by continuing to maintain and scale our current business, while also creating new categories with new business models and a new production function. This is inherently hard, and few companies can do both. But I have full confidence that we can, and we will once again find the resolve, courage, and clarity to deliver on our mission in this new paradigm. With that context, I want to re-ground ourselves in our why, what, and how: our mission, our priorities, and our culture. Our why: mission What does achieving our mission look like and feel like for us as a company? When Microsoft is succeeding, the world around us must succeed too. This is why each of us chose to be here, and as a company it's how we earn our social permission to operate. When Bill founded Microsoft, he envisioned not just a software company, but a software factory, unconstrained by any single product or category. That idea has guided us for decades. But today, it's no longer enough. We must reimagine our mission for a new era. What does empowerment look like in the era of AI? It's not just about building tools for specific roles or tasks. It's about building tools that empower everyone to create their own tools. That's the shift we are driving—from a software factory to an intelligence engine empowering every person and organization to build whatever they need to achieve. Just imagine if all 8 billion people could summon a researcher, an analyst, or a coding agent at their fingertips, not just to get information but use their expertise to get things done that benefit them. And consider how organizations, empowered with AI, could unlock entirely new levels of agility and innovation by transforming decision-making, streamlining operations, and enabling every team to achieve more together than ever before. That's the empowerment our mission enables, creating local surplus in every company, community, and country. And that's our opportunity ahead. Our what: priorities To deliver on our mission, we need to stay focused on our three business priorities: security, quality, and AI transformation. We are doubling down on the fundamentals while continuing to define new frontiers in AI. Security and quality are non-negotiable. Our infrastructure and services are mission critical for the world, and without them we don't have permission to move forward. We've made substantial progress across SFI, QEI, and Engineering Thrive this year, and they remain top priorities to ensure that we continuously improve our innovation velocity and our operational metrics. We will reimagine every layer of the tech stack for AI—infrastructure, to the app platform, to apps and agents. The key is to get the platform primitives right for these new workloads and for the next order of magnitude of scale. Our differentiation will come from how we bring these layers together to deliver end-to-end experiences and products, with the core ethos of a platform company that fosters ecosystem opportunity broadly. Getting both the product and platform right for the AI wave is our North Star! Our performance this past year has positioned us well. And we must move forward with the intentionality and intensity that these industry shifts demand. Our how: culture Growth mindset has served us well over the last decade—the everyday practice of being a learn-it-all, not a know-it-all. It has reshaped our culture and helped us lead with greater humility and empathy. We need to keep that. It starts with each of us as individuals and our personal drive to learn, improve, and get better every day. Professional rewards, growth, and pride in our craft will always be the prime drivers. Beyond that, we each have the opportunity to connect our personal passion and philosophy of how we derive meaning from the work we do with Microsoft's mission to empower the world. This is what makes it all worthwhile. This platform shift is reshaping not only the products we build and the business models we operate under, but also how we are structured and how we work together every day. It might feel messy at times, but transformation always is. Teams are reorganizing. Scopes are expanding. New opportunities are everywhere. It reminds me of the early '90s, when PCs and productivity software became standard in every home and every desk! That's exactly where we are now with AI. Years from now, when you look back at your time here, I hope you'll say: "That's when I learned the most. That's when I made my biggest impact. That's when I was part of something transformational." What we've learned over the past five decades is that success is not about longevity. It's about relevance. Our future won't be defined by what we've built before, but by what we empower others to build now. And I know that with your dedication, drive, and hard work we can go win together, and change the world in the process. I look forward to sharing more at Earnings next week and addressing your questions at our next Town Hall.

Microsoft this year has announced it would lay off around 15,000 workers and cut nearly 2,000 more employees considered underperformers

The cost of progress? Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella says in memo, 'Progress isn't linear. It's dynamic'

You ask for the meaning of a word or the cheapest way to travel to a new country and within seconds get a detailed answer. ChatGPT, Gemini and other such AI chatbots have become fonts for all sorts of information from the mundane to the complex. These AI-softwares have made our lives quicker and easier than ever before with ChatGPT recording 180 million monthly users in 2025. While queries like a 2,000 word essay on an obscure history topic may be harmless, there is a darker side to the unabridged use of artificial intelligence.Young people, especially those who fall in the GenZ category, are increasingly using these softwares for life advice and to decode mental health struggles that all of us go through.Even Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT has admitted that GenZ and millennials are using the platform as a ‘life advisor,’ often asking it for relationship and life advice.But this can be dangerous, as sometimes AI is steeped in stereotypes and dogma. Grok, the AI chatbot of X , recently came under the line of fire for giving anti-semitic responses, forcing the company to issue an apology.A Norwegian research group found that ChatGPT sometimes even gave advice to people on how to get away with serious crimes.In November 2024, Google’s Gemini reportedly threatened a student while assisting him with his homework and told him to ‘please die.’A month later, &nbsp;a family in Texas, USA filed a lawsuit claiming that an AI chatbot told their teenage child that killing his parents is a “reasonable response” to them limiting his screen time.But despite these obvious concerns, people are using AI for personal advice, willingly opening both their hearts and minds to it. &nbsp;What makes it so attractive?Hemakshi Mittal, a student of Christ University, says that she personally found AI to be “very useful because ChatGPT has a very non-judgmental, logic-based approach towards things, and it doesn’t give conclusions or suggestions based on your age, career choices or academics.”Similarly, Adrien, a 21-year-old engineer, said that “it’s kind of like texting someone who’ll always reply, even if it's just to organise my feelings.”Rupam Shukla, a 22-year-old sports journalist, said that he used AI for advice on how to deal with a colleague who was bad-mouthing him, and the advice actually helped him.<h2>Replacement for therapy?</h2>Therapy in India is still something that is widely accessed only by the economically wealthy sections of society. This may be one of the reasons that many people lean towards using AI for life advice, often using it as a therapist.Hemakshi agrees and says that “one session costs around Rs 1500 to 2000, and that is not exactly very affordable being a student, so it (AI) has indeed helped me with my emotional baggage.”Faishal, a 24-year-old, says that “many people don’t take therapy due to social stigma and thus choose AI for life advice.”On being asked if AI is a replacement for therapy, the responses were varied.While Adrien said that it is “not a replacement, but maybe as a supplement. Therapists bring empathy and nuance that AI can't fully replicate. But AI’s great for in-between moments.”Hemakshi says that even if therapy was more easily accessible, she would still choose AI because “ AI sees your problem and focuses only on the base root of the problem in itself and not other parameters like your career or your age or your relationship with your parents.”<h2>Mental health experts consider AI a mixed bag</h2>Therapists and psychiatrists consider AI to be a mixed bag to process emotions and feelings.“Not only does using AI for therapy risk your privacy, since you're sharing deeply personal information with a machine it also undermines the years of rigorous training, education, and ethical responsibility that therapists, students, and mental health professionals commit to. Accessible support is important, but so is recognising what real therapy involves,” says Mansi Poddar, a trauma-informed psychotherapist.“Therapy involves building rapport and then providing emotional support and then guiding the person through whatever the issue. I doubt whether AI will be able to do that. But in the future, with advances AI may be able to emotionally connect with the client,” says Dr Subhash, a psychiatrist practising in India’s Thiruvananthapuram.<h2>AI can be a therapist’s helping hand</h2>While experts do not consider AI a suitable replacement for human therapists, they agree that it can be used as a tool to help aid the therapeutic process.“By analysing the inputs people share with chatbots, we can gain valuable insights into what individuals are seeking from therapy and perhaps even what they feel is missing in human-led sessions. This data can serve as a useful resource for improving mental health services overall,” adds Mansi Poddar.“AI can screen, recognise patterns requiring intervention and provide basic inputs for the therapist to act on,” adds Dr Subhash.<h2>Need for caution</h2>While artificial intelligence is not going anywhere and its growth in all aspects of our life—including mental health—is bound to grow, it is important that we only rely on humans and trained mental health practitioners for advice and help.

People are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence bots like ChatGPT and Gemini for life advice as an alternative to therapy and mental health support. WION’s Akul Baiju talks to users and mental health experts about this growing trend.

You ask for the meaning of a word or the cheapest way to travel to a new country and within seconds get a detailed answer. ChatGPT, Gemini and other such AI chatbots have become fonts for all sorts of information from the mundane to the complex. These AI-softwares have made our lives quicker and easier than ever before with ChatGPT recording 180 million monthly users in 2025. While queries like a 2,000 word essay on an obscure history topic may be harmless, there is a darker side to the unabridged use of artificial intelligence. Young people, especially those who fall in the GenZ category, are increasingly using these softwares for life advice and to decode mental health struggles that all of us go through. Even Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT has admitted that GenZ and millennials are using the platform as a ‘life advisor,’ often asking it for relationship and life advice. But this can be dangerous, as sometimes AI is steeped in stereotypes and dogma. Grok, the AI chatbot of X , recently came under the line of fire for giving anti-semitic responses, forcing the company to issue an apology. A Norwegian research group found that ChatGPT sometimes even gave advice to people on how to get away with serious crimes. In November 2024, Google’s Gemini reportedly threatened a student while assisting him with his homework and told him to ‘please die.’ A month later, a family in Texas, USA filed a lawsuit claiming that an AI chatbot told their teenage child that killing his parents is a “reasonable response” to them limiting his screen time. But despite these obvious concerns, people are using AI for personal advice, willingly opening both their hearts and minds to it. What makes it so attractive? Hemakshi Mittal, a student of Christ University, says that she personally found AI to be “very useful because ChatGPT has a very non-judgmental, logic-based approach towards things, and it doesn’t give conclusions or suggestions based on your age, career choices or academics.” Similarly, Adrien, a 21-year-old engineer, said that “it’s kind of like texting someone who’ll always reply, even if it's just to organise my feelings.” Rupam Shukla, a 22-year-old sports journalist, said that he used AI for advice on how to deal with a colleague who was bad-mouthing him, and the advice actually helped him. Replacement for therapy? Therapy in India is still something that is widely accessed only by the economically wealthy sections of society. This may be one of the reasons that many people lean towards using AI for life advice, often using it as a therapist. Hemakshi agrees and says that “one session costs around Rs 1500 to 2000, and that is not exactly very affordable being a student, so it (AI) has indeed helped me with my emotional baggage.” Faishal, a 24-year-old, says that “many people don’t take therapy due to social stigma and thus choose AI for life advice.” On being asked if AI is a replacement for therapy, the responses were varied. While Adrien said that it is “not a replacement, but maybe as a supplement. Therapists bring empathy and nuance that AI can't fully replicate. But AI’s great for in-between moments.” Hemakshi says that even if therapy was more easily accessible, she would still choose AI because “ AI sees your problem and focuses only on the base root of the problem in itself and not other parameters like your career or your age or your relationship with your parents.” Mental health experts consider AI a mixed bag Therapists and psychiatrists consider AI to be a mixed bag to process emotions and feelings. “Not only does using AI for therapy risk your privacy, since you're sharing deeply personal information with a machine it also undermines the years of rigorous training, education, and ethical responsibility that therapists, students, and mental health professionals commit to. Accessible support is important, but so is recognising what real therapy involves,” says Mansi Poddar, a trauma-informed psychotherapist. “Therapy involves building rapport and then providing emotional support and then guiding the person through whatever the issue. I doubt whether AI will be able to do that. But in the future, with advances AI may be able to emotionally connect with the client,” says Dr Subhash, a psychiatrist practising in India’s Thiruvananthapuram. AI can be a therapist’s helping hand While experts do not consider AI a suitable replacement for human therapists, they agree that it can be used as a tool to help aid the therapeutic process. “By analysing the inputs people share with chatbots, we can gain valuable insights into what individuals are seeking from therapy and perhaps even what they feel is missing in human-led sessions. This data can serve as a useful resource for improving mental health services overall,” adds Mansi Poddar. “AI can screen, recognise patterns requiring intervention and provide basic inputs for the therapist to act on,” adds Dr Subhash. Need for caution While artificial intelligence is not going anywhere and its growth in all aspects of our life—including mental health—is bound to grow, it is important that we only rely on humans and trained mental health practitioners for advice and help.

People are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence bots like ChatGPT and Gemini for life advice as an alternative to therapy and mental health support. WION’s Akul Baiju talks to users and mental health experts about this growing trend.

AI is the new therapist? Experts weigh in on the growing trend of asking ChatGPT for life advice

How 5 countries are using AI to transform air force pilot training, from simulators to virtual combat. Will these innovations reshape air warfare? 

How 5 countries are using AI to transform air force pilot training, from simulators to virtual combat. Will these innovations reshape air warfare?&nbsp;

5 countries using AI to train fighter jet pilots like never before

Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated videos are becoming dangerously real, so much so that they can deceive you into believing anything. An old couple in Malaysia was in for a rude shock when they travelled hours to a destination, dreaming of riding a scenic cable car. They had seen it in a video and were excited about the idea. They undertook a three-hour ride from Kuala Lumpur to visit the resort in Perak state, shown in the video. Upon reaching their hotel, they enquired about the cable car. To their surprise, a staff member informed them that no such attraction existed in the town, which is usually quiet with no attractions. The female staff member shared the story of the elderly couple on social media last month.&nbsp;<h2>AI host interviewed people in fake video</h2>The staff person shared that when they asked her about the cable car, she thought they were joking. They refused to believe her when she told them about the non-existence of such an attraction in the area. The couple told her it was impossible since they saw the place in a video, which showed a female reporter showing off the attraction. The video even had her interviewing other people at the site, asking them about their experience. The staff member told them that it was an AI-generated video. “Why did they do this to people?” the shocked woman asked. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/chinese-man-secretly-films-sex-sessions-with-over-1-000-men-posts-videos-online-and-charges-people-to-watch-1752139527241">Chinese man dresses as woman, films sex sessions with over 1,000 men, posts videos online</a>&nbsp;The video in question has since been taken down. It showed a female host enjoying the fun tram ride, Kuak Skyride, located in the town of Kuak Hulu in Perak. The channel name “TV Rakyat” is also visible. The woman can be seen taking a ride in the cable car, walking through the forests and enjoying the beautiful mountains. She talks to other people in the video about the Kuak attraction, who share what an exciting time they had there. The host also enjoys a meal at a restaurant in the same place. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/511-billion-barrels-of-oil-discovered-in-antarctica-can-trigger-world-war-1752036274384">511 billion barrels of oil discovered in Antarctica can trigger World War. Here's how</a>Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/grok-chatbot-x-nazi-terms-adolf-hitler-nazi-holocaust-concentration-camps-1752032095983">'Eliminate the threat through camps and worse': Grok invokes Hitler, seemingly calls for another Holocaust</a><h2>Woman wanted to sue the AI host</h2>After learning the truth, the elderly woman got angry and vowed to sue the woman in the video. The hotel staff member explained to her that nothing in the video was real, not even the female host. The couple was left utterly confused and disheartened after falling prey to the scam. After the incident came to light, a similar case was revealed. A man told Malaysian news outlet Says that his parents also saw the AI-generated video and spent 9,000 ringgit (US$2,120) to rent a van.The case has left people on social media shocked to their core. They have raised concerns about the havoc AI is already causing and the need to control it before it is too late. A user expressed shock at what the old couple had to endure, spending all that money to visit an attraction that does not exist. Another pointed out that even young people could fall victim to such videos, especially since she did not realise it was AI until she read the comments.&nbsp; &nbsp;

AI tourism video: A couple in Malaysia reached a state in the country to visit a tourist attraction they had seen in a video. However, they were not prepared for what they were told when they reached the hotel. 

Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated videos are becoming dangerously real, so much so that they can deceive you into believing anything. An old couple in Malaysia was in for a rude shock when they travelled hours to a destination, dreaming of riding a scenic cable car. They had seen it in a video and were excited about the idea. They undertook a three-hour ride from Kuala Lumpur to visit the resort in Perak state, shown in the video. Upon reaching their hotel, they enquired about the cable car. To their surprise, a staff member informed them that no such attraction existed in the town, which is usually quiet with no attractions. The female staff member shared the story of the elderly couple on social media last month. AI host interviewed people in fake video The staff person shared that when they asked her about the cable car, she thought they were joking. They refused to believe her when she told them about the non-existence of such an attraction in the area. The couple told her it was impossible since they saw the place in a video, which showed a female reporter showing off the attraction. The video even had her interviewing other people at the site, asking them about their experience. The staff member told them that it was an AI-generated video. “Why did they do this to people?” the shocked woman asked. Also Read: Chinese man dresses as woman, films sex sessions with over 1,000 men, posts videos online The video in question has since been taken down. It showed a female host enjoying the fun tram ride, Kuak Skyride, located in the town of Kuak Hulu in Perak. The channel name “TV Rakyat” is also visible. The woman can be seen taking a ride in the cable car, walking through the forests and enjoying the beautiful mountains. She talks to other people in the video about the Kuak attraction, who share what an exciting time they had there. The host also enjoys a meal at a restaurant in the same place. Also Read: 511 billion barrels of oil discovered in Antarctica can trigger World War. Here's how Also Read: 'Eliminate the threat through camps and worse': Grok invokes Hitler, seemingly calls for another Holocaust Woman wanted to sue the AI host After learning the truth, the elderly woman got angry and vowed to sue the woman in the video. The hotel staff member explained to her that nothing in the video was real, not even the female host. The couple was left utterly confused and disheartened after falling prey to the scam. After the incident came to light, a similar case was revealed. A man told Malaysian news outlet Says that his parents also saw the AI-generated video and spent 9,000 ringgit (US$2,120) to rent a van. The case has left people on social media shocked to their core. They have raised concerns about the havoc AI is already causing and the need to control it before it is too late. A user expressed shock at what the old couple had to endure, spending all that money to visit an attraction that does not exist. Another pointed out that even young people could fall victim to such videos, especially since she did not realise it was AI until she read the comments.

AI tourism video: A couple in Malaysia reached a state in the country to visit a tourist attraction they had seen in a video. However, they were not prepared for what they were told when they reached the hotel.&nbsp;

AI video fools elderly couple into taking a trip to a place that does not exist

In Oman, drivers who take traffic rules lightly or violate them would now have to escape eyes in the sky. As per reports, the Royal Oman Police (ROP) has begun the deployment of artificial intelligence-powered smart systems that would monitor traffic violations, especially the use of mobile phones while driving and the failure to wear seat belts. This comes as the World Health Organization (WHO) reveals that distracted driving, particularly due to the use of mobile phones, poses one of the greatest modern threats to road safety. Oman's AI-driven traffic violation system is part of the Royal Oman Police's (ROP) broader strategy to enhance road safety.<h2>What would the AI do?</h2>As per Brigadier Eng. Ali bin Sulayem Al Falahi, Director-General of Traffic at the ROP, the cutting-edge technology has been designed to analyse data and enforce traffic laws more effectively. As cited by 'The Arabian Stories', he said that the ROP was implementing a comprehensive monitoring system that integrates smart traffic lights along with the AI-supported cameras. The cameras, he said, are capable of detecting traffic violations without any need for human intervention.Brigadier Al Falahi also said that in the Sultanate the most common traffic violations include speeding, running red lights and seatbelt non-compliance. Additionally, cases of distracted driving, mainly due to the use of mobile phones, is also common.<h2>What would be the penalties for traffic violations caught by AI cameras?</h2>As per Al Falahi, gradual legal actions would be taken, penalties for traffic violations would range from temporary licence suspension to mandatory driving qualification courses to vehicles would be impounded. Meanwhile, if a driver commits repeated violations, their driving licence would be permanently cancelled.<h2>Texting and driving: A growing modern problem</h2>AS per the WHO, mobile phone use has led to a growing problem of driver distraction. In a 2011 report, the organisation warned, "Distracted driving is a serious and growing threat to road safety. With more and more people owning mobile phones, and the rapid introduction of new “in-vehicle” communication systems, this problem is likely to escalate globally in the coming years." As per Gulf News, globally, every year, around 1.19 million people die in road accidents, and another 20 to 50 million suffer non-fatal injuries. &nbsp;

Oman's AI-driven traffic violation system is part of the Royal Oman Police's (ROP) broader strategy to enhance road safety.

In Oman, drivers who take traffic rules lightly or violate them would now have to escape eyes in the sky. As per reports, the Royal Oman Police (ROP) has begun the deployment of artificial intelligence-powered smart systems that would monitor traffic violations, especially the use of mobile phones while driving and the failure to wear seat belts. This comes as the World Health Organization (WHO) reveals that distracted driving, particularly due to the use of mobile phones, poses one of the greatest modern threats to road safety. Oman's AI-driven traffic violation system is part of the Royal Oman Police's (ROP) broader strategy to enhance road safety. What would the AI do? As per Brigadier Eng. Ali bin Sulayem Al Falahi, Director-General of Traffic at the ROP, the cutting-edge technology has been designed to analyse data and enforce traffic laws more effectively. As cited by 'The Arabian Stories', he said that the ROP was implementing a comprehensive monitoring system that integrates smart traffic lights along with the AI-supported cameras. The cameras, he said, are capable of detecting traffic violations without any need for human intervention. Brigadier Al Falahi also said that in the Sultanate the most common traffic violations include speeding, running red lights and seatbelt non-compliance. Additionally, cases of distracted driving, mainly due to the use of mobile phones, is also common. What would be the penalties for traffic violations caught by AI cameras? As per Al Falahi, gradual legal actions would be taken, penalties for traffic violations would range from temporary licence suspension to mandatory driving qualification courses to vehicles would be impounded. Meanwhile, if a driver commits repeated violations, their driving licence would be permanently cancelled. Texting and driving: A growing modern problem AS per the WHO, mobile phone use has led to a growing problem of driver distraction. In a 2011 report, the organisation warned, "Distracted driving is a serious and growing threat to road safety. With more and more people owning mobile phones, and the rapid introduction of new “in-vehicle” communication systems, this problem is likely to escalate globally in the coming years." As per Gulf News, globally, every year, around 1.19 million people die in road accidents, and another 20 to 50 million suffer non-fatal injuries.

Oman's AI-driven traffic violation system is part of the Royal Oman Police's (ROP) broader strategy to enhance road safety.

AI cameras to catch distracted drivers in Oman — texting at the wheel could cost your licence

In a bizarre incident, an unknown imposter pretending to be US State Secretary Marco Rubio contacted foreign ministers, a US governor, and a member of Congress by sending them voice and text messages. The fraudster used artificial intelligence to impersonate Marco Rubio as he contacted at least five senior officials, according to a state department cable seen by The Washington Post.The imposter used voice and writing style using AI-powered software, according to a senior US official and the State Department cable.The cable, which was dated July 3, stated that the imposter "left voicemails on Signal for at least two targeted individuals” and sent text messages inviting others to communicate on the platform.However, it is not clear who is behind this, but the cable reported that the goal had been "gaining access to information or accounts" of key government officials.The man used both text messaging and the encrypted messaging app Signal and contacted "at least five non-Department individuals, including three foreign ministers, a U.S. governor, and a U.S. member of Congress."Signal is used widely by the Trump administration for official purposes.All this began in mid-June when the imposter created a Signal account using the display name "Marco.Rubio@state.gov”, as he contacted foreign and domestic diplomats and politicians.“The actor left voicemails on Signal for at least two targeted individuals and in one instance, sent a text message inviting the individual to communicate on Signal,” according to the cable.The State Department stressed that it would carry out a thorough investigation and continue to implement safeguards to prevent this from happening in the future.After the incident, the man who served as senior advisor to Barack Obama, said that the AI scam using Rubio was "only a matter of time”, urging that urgent action needs to be taken to defend against such attacks in the future.“A Marco Rubio impostor is using AI voice to call high-level officials,” David Axelrod said in a post on X. “This is the new world in which we live and we’d better figure out how to defend against it because of its implications for our democracy and the world.”&nbsp;

The imposter used voice and writing style using AI-powered software, according to a senior US official and the State Department cable.

In a bizarre incident, an unknown imposter pretending to be US State Secretary Marco Rubio contacted foreign ministers, a US governor, and a member of Congress by sending them voice and text messages. The fraudster used artificial intelligence to impersonate Marco Rubio as he contacted at least five senior officials, according to a state department cable seen by The Washington Post. The imposter used voice and writing style using AI-powered software, according to a senior US official and the State Department cable. The cable, which was dated July 3, stated that the imposter "left voicemails on Signal for at least two targeted individuals” and sent text messages inviting others to communicate on the platform. However, it is not clear who is behind this, but the cable reported that the goal had been "gaining access to information or accounts" of key government officials. The man used both text messaging and the encrypted messaging app Signal and contacted "at least five non-Department individuals, including three foreign ministers, a U.S. governor, and a U.S. member of Congress." Signal is used widely by the Trump administration for official purposes. All this began in mid-June when the imposter created a Signal account using the display name "Marco.Rubio@state.gov”, as he contacted foreign and domestic diplomats and politicians. “The actor left voicemails on Signal for at least two targeted individuals and in one instance, sent a text message inviting the individual to communicate on Signal,” according to the cable. The State Department stressed that it would carry out a thorough investigation and continue to implement safeguards to prevent this from happening in the future. After the incident, the man who served as senior advisor to Barack Obama, said that the AI scam using Rubio was "only a matter of time”, urging that urgent action needs to be taken to defend against such attacks in the future. “A Marco Rubio impostor is using AI voice to call high-level officials,” David Axelrod said in a post on X. “This is the new world in which we live and we’d better figure out how to defend against it because of its implications for our democracy and the world.”

The imposter used voice and writing style using AI-powered software, according to a senior US official and the State Department cable.

Fraudster trying to scam US officials? Marco Rubio imposter uses AI to contact senior officials on Signal - All you need to know

Artificial Intelligence has helped a couple welcome a baby after 18 years of trying to conceive naturally and through IVF. They visited several IVF clinics and underwent treatment, but nothing helped. Artificial fertilisation involves extracting the egg from the woman and sperm from the man and combining the two in the lab. However, in this case, the man was suffering from a condition that did not let his wife get pregnant. Azoospermia happens when there is no measurable sperm present in semen. It is found in about 1 per cent of infertile men. A typical semen sample contains several million sperm. But, in this man's case, doctors could not find even a single sperm. This became a problem in IVF as there was no semen to mix with the egg. After waiting for 18 years, they decided to give a shot to a new method of fertilisation. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-chatgpt-hallucinates-don-t-over-rely-on-it-openai-ceo-sam-altman-warns-users-1751366853229">‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users</a>&nbsp;<h2>The man's semen sample had only three sperm</h2>The Columbia University Fertility Center had come up with the STAR method, or Sperm Track and Recovery. It uses AI to detect sperm in the semen. The couple, which has remained anonymous, went in with little hope after facing several disappointments. However, it was a success. The method was able to find only three sperm in the sample of semen submitted by the man. The woman is not pregnant and is expecting to deliver in December. She still cannot believe that after years of waiting, they are finally welcoming a baby, she told CNN. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-jennifer-aniston-told-a-man-she-loved-him-and-asked-for-apple-gift-cards-it-was-an-elaborate-scam-1751450807026">'Jennifer Aniston' told a man she 'loved him' and asked for Apple gift cards. It was an elaborate scam</a>&nbsp;The STAR method is a breakthrough in the field of male infertility. In the US, medical facilities are now using AI to scan for sperm and detect healthy embryos and viable eggs for IVF. Dr. Zev Williams, director of the Columbia University Fertility Center, is behind the AI tech that can change the game for male infertility. Williams and his team took five years to develop the technology. He says they were amazed to see the initial results. He said a technician scanned a semen sample for two days to look for sperm, but couldn't find any. But when STAR analysed it, 44 sperm were detected in an hour.&nbsp;The STAR method uses a fluidic chip to scan semen for sperm. It connects to the microscope through a high-speed camera and high-powered imaging technology. Once it identifies the sperm, it isolates the sperm cell which can then be used for IVF or frozen for future use, Williams told TIME. He added that a typical semen sample contains 200 to 300 million sperm. But in some men, there are only two or three. The use of AI in STAR helps detect them to fertilise an egg and help couples have babies.&nbsp;

Artificial Intelligence helped a couple conceive after 18 years of trying. A new technology uses AI to detect sperm in semen. The sample only had three sperm, and humans could not have ever detected them. It is being seen as a breakthrough in male infertility.  

Artificial Intelligence has helped a couple welcome a baby after 18 years of trying to conceive naturally and through IVF. They visited several IVF clinics and underwent treatment, but nothing helped. Artificial fertilisation involves extracting the egg from the woman and sperm from the man and combining the two in the lab. However, in this case, the man was suffering from a condition that did not let his wife get pregnant. Azoospermia happens when there is no measurable sperm present in semen. It is found in about 1 per cent of infertile men. A typical semen sample contains several million sperm. But, in this man's case, doctors could not find even a single sperm. This became a problem in IVF as there was no semen to mix with the egg. After waiting for 18 years, they decided to give a shot to a new method of fertilisation. Also Read: ‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users The man's semen sample had only three sperm The Columbia University Fertility Center had come up with the STAR method, or Sperm Track and Recovery. It uses AI to detect sperm in the semen. The couple, which has remained anonymous, went in with little hope after facing several disappointments. However, it was a success. The method was able to find only three sperm in the sample of semen submitted by the man. The woman is not pregnant and is expecting to deliver in December. She still cannot believe that after years of waiting, they are finally welcoming a baby, she told CNN. Also Read: 'Jennifer Aniston' told a man she 'loved him' and asked for Apple gift cards. It was an elaborate scam The STAR method is a breakthrough in the field of male infertility. In the US, medical facilities are now using AI to scan for sperm and detect healthy embryos and viable eggs for IVF. Dr. Zev Williams, director of the Columbia University Fertility Center, is behind the AI tech that can change the game for male infertility. Williams and his team took five years to develop the technology. He says they were amazed to see the initial results. He said a technician scanned a semen sample for two days to look for sperm, but couldn't find any. But when STAR analysed it, 44 sperm were detected in an hour. The STAR method uses a fluidic chip to scan semen for sperm. It connects to the microscope through a high-speed camera and high-powered imaging technology. Once it identifies the sperm, it isolates the sperm cell which can then be used for IVF or frozen for future use, Williams told TIME. He added that a typical semen sample contains 200 to 300 million sperm. But in some men, there are only two or three. The use of AI in STAR helps detect them to fertilise an egg and help couples have babies.

Artificial Intelligence helped a couple conceive after 18 years of trying. A new technology uses AI to detect sperm in semen. The sample only had three sperm, and humans could not have ever detected them. It is being seen as a breakthrough in male infertility. &nbsp;

AI fulfills couple's wish of a baby after 18 years by detecting 3 lone sperm in man's semen

A man in the UK was duped of hundreds of pounds by a scammer who posed as Jennifer Aniston, even providing IDs to prove that they indeed were the FRIENDS star. Paul Davis was befriended by fraudsters on Facebook who referred to him as "my love" to hit where it really mattered. They used flirty emojis and sent doctored "selfies" of Aniston. Paul was asked to send non-refundable Apple gift cards to the person posing as Aniston, who told Paul that she "loved him", making him fully believe that he was talking to the actor. However, it all turned out to be a scam.Paul says that there have been bigger instances of fraudsters posing as famous people, trying to fully convince them that they were talking to a celebrity. He states that he has often been targeted by cheaters who prey on the vulnerable. They send AI-generated videos of celebrities which look extremely real. He says he has seen videos of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg as well. &nbsp;"It’s been going on for five months," he says.&nbsp;<h2>Fraudsters offer “special prize”, make videos look “so real”&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;In one of the videos, Paul was told that he had won a "special prize", which could either be cash or even a Range Rover. In another instance, Facebook founder Zuckerberg appeared on the screen and showed an ID card. He insisted that this was not a scam and that he was a real person. Paul says they make it look "so real." However, when the fraudsters posed as Aniston to lure Paul, they used the romantic route. They told him, as Aniston, that "she loved him". They asked him to send Apple gift cards because her "subscription was about to expire". To fully nail him down, they sent him a photo of Aniston's driving licence.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-chatgpt-hallucinates-don-t-over-rely-on-it-openai-ceo-sam-altman-warns-users-1751366853229">‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users</a>&nbsp;"I believed it - and I paid," Paul said. He raised serious concerns over such scammers who seem to be having a laugh at the expense of someone else. "Someone I know’s lost over a grand in Apple gift cards to these scams," he said. However, despite having seen fake videos of celebrities, he fell for it when they posed as Jennifer Aniston. “I got bitten. Once bitten, twice shy.” Such scams are becoming increasingly common as advancements are made in AI. A woman in France was scammed out of £700,000 by a person who posed as Brad Pitt, and asked for money for "cancer treatment". Scamsters are also using AI to generate voices to resemble loved ones of unsuspecting victims and defraud them of cash, claiming that the person is in danger.

Fraudsters posing as FRIENDS star Jennifer Aniston told a man she loved him, sent romantic emojis and tugged at his heartstrings. He was duped out of a lot of money as it was an AI-generated scam.

A man in the UK was duped of hundreds of pounds by a scammer who posed as Jennifer Aniston, even providing IDs to prove that they indeed were the FRIENDS star. Paul Davis was befriended by fraudsters on Facebook who referred to him as "my love" to hit where it really mattered. They used flirty emojis and sent doctored "selfies" of Aniston. Paul was asked to send non-refundable Apple gift cards to the person posing as Aniston, who told Paul that she "loved him", making him fully believe that he was talking to the actor. However, it all turned out to be a scam. Paul says that there have been bigger instances of fraudsters posing as famous people, trying to fully convince them that they were talking to a celebrity. He states that he has often been targeted by cheaters who prey on the vulnerable. They send AI-generated videos of celebrities which look extremely real. He says he has seen videos of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg as well. "It’s been going on for five months," he says. Fraudsters offer “special prize”, make videos look “so real” In one of the videos, Paul was told that he had won a "special prize", which could either be cash or even a Range Rover. In another instance, Facebook founder Zuckerberg appeared on the screen and showed an ID card. He insisted that this was not a scam and that he was a real person. Paul says they make it look "so real." However, when the fraudsters posed as Aniston to lure Paul, they used the romantic route. They told him, as Aniston, that "she loved him". They asked him to send Apple gift cards because her "subscription was about to expire". To fully nail him down, they sent him a photo of Aniston's driving licence. Also Read: ‘ChatGPT ‘hallucinates’, don’t overrely on it,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users "I believed it - and I paid," Paul said. He raised serious concerns over such scammers who seem to be having a laugh at the expense of someone else. "Someone I know’s lost over a grand in Apple gift cards to these scams," he said. However, despite having seen fake videos of celebrities, he fell for it when they posed as Jennifer Aniston. “I got bitten. Once bitten, twice shy.” Such scams are becoming increasingly common as advancements are made in AI. A woman in France was scammed out of £700,000 by a person who posed as Brad Pitt, and asked for money for "cancer treatment". Scamsters are also using AI to generate voices to resemble loved ones of unsuspecting victims and defraud them of cash, claiming that the person is in danger.

Fraudsters posing as FRIENDS star Jennifer Aniston told a man she loved him, sent romantic emojis and tugged at his heartstrings. He was duped out of a lot of money as it was an AI-generated scam.

'Jennifer Aniston' told a man she 'loved him' and asked for Apple gift cards. It was an elaborate scam

As companies invest billions in artificial intelligence, employees are being asked to prove they’re using it.<h2>AI adoption at work&nbsp;</h2>Despite quick AI growth, most employees aren't using it daily yet. A <a href="https://www.gallup.com/workplace/691643/work-nearly-doubled-two-years.aspx">Gallup study</a> found that only 8 per cent of workers in the United States use AI tools daily, up from 4 per cent a year ago. Even when companies claim they have adopted AI, usage by employees remains limited as of now.&nbsp;<a href="https://kpmg.com/us/en/articles/2025/trust-attitudes-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence.html?utm_source=other&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=701dV000009wQLiQAM&amp;cid=701dV000009wQLiQAM">KPMG surveyed</a> over 48,000 workers worldwide and found that 27 per cent said they never intentionally used AI at work, while only 17 per cent said they used it daily. This slow adoption is raising concerns for companies that have spent large sums on AI integration.<h2>Microsoft links AI usage to performance reviews</h2>Many companies are now making AI usage mandatory. <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-internal-memo-using-ai-no-longer-optional-github-copilot-2025-6">Microsoft</a> has told managers to include AI tool adoption as part of employee performance evaluations. “AI is now a fundamental part of how we work,” Microsoft’s internal communication reportedly said.&nbsp;Julia Liuson, president of Microsoft’s developer division, stated that like collaboration and communication, using AI is now a basic expectation across roles. The company is also exploring formal tracking of AI tool usage.&nbsp;<h2>Moderna takes a different approach</h2>While Microsoft uses mandates, pharmaceutical company Moderna has chosen a training-based model. In just six months, nearly all digital employees at <a href="https://openai.com/index/moderna/">Moderna began using ChatGPT</a> Enterprise. The company created 750 custom GPTs and merged its HR and tech teams to support adoption.&nbsp;Moderna focused on solving real business problems using AI. For example, legal teams created AI assistants for reviewing contracts, and clinical teams developed tools to analyse trial data. As a result, the company reports over 120 AI chats per user each week.<h2>What works best: training, not pressure</h2>Studies show that when employees understand how AI helps their work, they are more likely to use it. Gallup found that when leaders clearly communicate their AI strategy, employees are three times more likely to feel ready to work with AI. Those with experience using AI also report higher confidence in its benefits.&nbsp;Companies with volunteer pilot programmes, targeted training, and specific use cases see the most success. Firms that focus on solving real problems, rather than simply pushing usage, have better results.

More companies are pushing employees to use AI at work. While adoption remains low, firms like Microsoft and Moderna are linking AI use to job reviews or offering training. Clear goals, support, and solving real problems help boost usage and confidence in AI.


As companies invest billions in artificial intelligence, employees are being asked to prove they’re using it. AI adoption at work Despite quick AI growth, most employees aren't using it daily yet. A Gallup study found that only 8 per cent of workers in the United States use AI tools daily, up from 4 per cent a year ago. Even when companies claim they have adopted AI, usage by employees remains limited as of now. KPMG surveyed over 48,000 workers worldwide and found that 27 per cent said they never intentionally used AI at work, while only 17 per cent said they used it daily. This slow adoption is raising concerns for companies that have spent large sums on AI integration. Microsoft links AI usage to performance reviews Many companies are now making AI usage mandatory. Microsoft has told managers to include AI tool adoption as part of employee performance evaluations. “AI is now a fundamental part of how we work,” Microsoft’s internal communication reportedly said. Julia Liuson, president of Microsoft’s developer division, stated that like collaboration and communication, using AI is now a basic expectation across roles. The company is also exploring formal tracking of AI tool usage. Moderna takes a different approach While Microsoft uses mandates, pharmaceutical company Moderna has chosen a training-based model. In just six months, nearly all digital employees at Moderna began using ChatGPT Enterprise. The company created 750 custom GPTs and merged its HR and tech teams to support adoption. Moderna focused on solving real business problems using AI. For example, legal teams created AI assistants for reviewing contracts, and clinical teams developed tools to analyse trial data. As a result, the company reports over 120 AI chats per user each week. What works best: training, not pressure Studies show that when employees understand how AI helps their work, they are more likely to use it. Gallup found that when leaders clearly communicate their AI strategy, employees are three times more likely to feel ready to work with AI. Those with experience using AI also report higher confidence in its benefits. Companies with volunteer pilot programmes, targeted training, and specific use cases see the most success. Firms that focus on solving real problems, rather than simply pushing usage, have better results.

More companies are pushing employees to use AI at work. While adoption remains low, firms like Microsoft and Moderna are linking AI use to job reviews or offering training. Clear goals, support, and solving real problems help boost usage and confidence in AI.

Are you ready? Your company might soon evaluate you based on smarter AI usage

Meta Platforms Inc. is in advanced discussions to invest over $10 billion in artificial intelligence (AI) startup Scale AI, a move that would mark the tech giant’s most significant external AI investment to date, according to a report by&nbsp;Bloomberg.The deal, which is still under negotiation, could become one of the largest private funding rounds in history, according to sources cited by&nbsp;Bloomberg.Founded in 2016 by CEO Alexandr Wang, Scale AI provides data labelling services essential to training machine learning models.The company’s client list includes AI powerhouses such as Microsoft and OpenAI. Last valued at approximately $14 billion in 2024, Scale has since been in talks for a tender offer that could raise its valuation to $25 billion.<h2>Meta shifts strategy amid AI arms race</h2>Meta’s potential multibillion-dollar stake would represent a strategic pivot for the company, which has in the past relied on in-house AI research and open-source development, rather than making large external investments like its competitors.This approach differs sharply from that of other Big Tech companies. Microsoft has poured over $13 billion into OpenAI, while Amazon and Alphabet have each committed billions to Anthropic, a rival AI startup. Many of these investments have been structured to include cloud-compute credits, a model Meta may not follow, as it does not operate a cloud platform.In January, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg declared AI the company’s top strategic priority, announcing plans to invest as much as $65 billion in AI projects in 2025. One of its flagship efforts is Llama, its open-source large language model, which powers an AI assistant integrated into Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, now reaching 1 billion users per month.If the Scale deal materialises, it would mark Meta’s biggest external AI deal and deepen its involvement in AI data infrastructure, an area crucial to maintaining competitiveness in the rapidly evolving generative AI landscape.<h2>Scale AI: A data powerhouse</h2>Scale AI has seen meteoric growth, with 2024 revenues hitting $870 million and expectations of $2 billion in sales in 2025. The company plays a critical role in the AI ecosystem by using vast networks of contract workers to clean and label datasets, images, text, and other data required for training advanced models.As the demand for high-quality, well-curated data intensifies, Scale’s services have become indispensable, especially as generative AI tools spread across industries and applications.<h2>Shared interest in defence tech</h2>Both Meta and Scale AI are increasingly extending their reach into defence technology. Meta recently partnered with defence contractor Anduril Industries to develop AI-enabled military products, including a virtual/augmented reality helmet. Meta has also authorised its AI models for use by US government agencies and defence contractors.The two companies are working together on Defence Llama, a military-focused version of Meta’s language model. Meanwhile, Scale AI secured a US Department of Defense contract earlier this year to develop AI agent technology, which the company described as a “significant milestone in military advancement”.The alignment of their defence ambitions may be another factor strengthening Meta’s interest in Scale.While terms of the Meta-Scale deal remain fluid, the potential $10 billion-plus investment underscores a new phase in Meta’s AI playbook. As it works to close the gap with AI leaders like Microsoft and Google, investing in foundational AI infrastructure through a high-growth startup like Scale could give Meta access to both strategic data capabilities and government partnerships.If finalised, the deal will not only reshape Meta’s role in the global AI race, but it may also cement Scale AI’s position as a central force in the generative AI revolution.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

Meta’s potential multibillion-dollar stake would represent a strategic pivot for the company, which has in the past relied on in-house AI research and open-source development, rather than making large external investments like its competitors.

Meta Platforms Inc. is in advanced discussions to invest over $10 billion in artificial intelligence (AI) startup Scale AI, a move that would mark the tech giant’s most significant external AI investment to date, according to a report by Bloomberg. The deal, which is still under negotiation, could become one of the largest private funding rounds in history, according to sources cited by Bloomberg. Founded in 2016 by CEO Alexandr Wang, Scale AI provides data labelling services essential to training machine learning models. The company’s client list includes AI powerhouses such as Microsoft and OpenAI. Last valued at approximately $14 billion in 2024, Scale has since been in talks for a tender offer that could raise its valuation to $25 billion. Meta shifts strategy amid AI arms race Meta’s potential multibillion-dollar stake would represent a strategic pivot for the company, which has in the past relied on in-house AI research and open-source development, rather than making large external investments like its competitors. This approach differs sharply from that of other Big Tech companies. Microsoft has poured over $13 billion into OpenAI, while Amazon and Alphabet have each committed billions to Anthropic, a rival AI startup. Many of these investments have been structured to include cloud-compute credits, a model Meta may not follow, as it does not operate a cloud platform. In January, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg declared AI the company’s top strategic priority, announcing plans to invest as much as $65 billion in AI projects in 2025. One of its flagship efforts is Llama, its open-source large language model, which powers an AI assistant integrated into Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, now reaching 1 billion users per month. If the Scale deal materialises, it would mark Meta’s biggest external AI deal and deepen its involvement in AI data infrastructure, an area crucial to maintaining competitiveness in the rapidly evolving generative AI landscape. Scale AI: A data powerhouse Scale AI has seen meteoric growth, with 2024 revenues hitting $870 million and expectations of $2 billion in sales in 2025. The company plays a critical role in the AI ecosystem by using vast networks of contract workers to clean and label datasets, images, text, and other data required for training advanced models. As the demand for high-quality, well-curated data intensifies, Scale’s services have become indispensable, especially as generative AI tools spread across industries and applications. Shared interest in defence tech Both Meta and Scale AI are increasingly extending their reach into defence technology. Meta recently partnered with defence contractor Anduril Industries to develop AI-enabled military products, including a virtual/augmented reality helmet. Meta has also authorised its AI models for use by US government agencies and defence contractors. The two companies are working together on Defence Llama, a military-focused version of Meta’s language model. Meanwhile, Scale AI secured a US Department of Defense contract earlier this year to develop AI agent technology, which the company described as a “significant milestone in military advancement”. The alignment of their defence ambitions may be another factor strengthening Meta’s interest in Scale. While terms of the Meta-Scale deal remain fluid, the potential $10 billion-plus investment underscores a new phase in Meta’s AI playbook. As it works to close the gap with AI leaders like Microsoft and Google, investing in foundational AI infrastructure through a high-growth startup like Scale could give Meta access to both strategic data capabilities and government partnerships. If finalised, the deal will not only reshape Meta’s role in the global AI race, but it may also cement Scale AI’s position as a central force in the generative AI revolution. (With inputs from agencies)

Meta’s potential multibillion-dollar stake would represent a strategic pivot for the company, which has in the past relied on in-house AI research and open-source development, rather than making large external investments like its competitors.

Meta in talks to invest over $10 billion in Scale AI amid expanding AI push

AI is helping predict wildfires before they start. By using satellite data, weather patterns, and real-time monitoring, AI models help experts spot danger early, plan better, and protect lives, homes, and nature around the world.

AI is helping predict wildfires before they start. By using satellite data, weather patterns, and real-time monitoring, AI models help experts spot danger early, plan better, and protect lives, homes, and nature around the world.

How AI is predicting wildfires before they start – using satellite and weather data to forecast risk

ChatGPT maker OpenAI and Microsoft are reworking the terms of their multibillion-dollar partnership in high-stakes negotiations that will enable OpenAI to go public in the future while preserving the software giant&rsquo;s access to artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the&nbsp;Financial Times reported Sunday.
The outcome of these talks could reshape OpenAI's structure, moving it further from its roots as a not-for-profit research organisation into a hybrid business model. The adjustments to the terms of this partnership are pivotal for OpenAI&rsquo;s continued growth and its ability to tap into funding.
A central point of contention in the ongoing negotiations is the equity stake Microsoft will hold in OpenAI&rsquo;s new for-profit entity in exchange for its investment. Since its initial $1 billion investment in OpenAI in 2019, Microsoft has provided further funding, bringing its total investment to around $13 billion. In return, the software giant has gained access to OpenAI&rsquo;s cutting-edge AI models and products, which are embedded in Microsoft&rsquo;s offerings. As OpenAI prepares for an IPO, Microsoft is seeking to maintain its substantial access to AI technology, especially as OpenAI&rsquo;s ambitions grow beyond current capabilities.
<h2 dir="ltr">Microsoft's priority: AI access</h2>
The discussions revolve around revising a key contract, which currently runs through 2030, that governs Microsoft&rsquo;s rights to OpenAI&rsquo;s intellectual property and the revenue share model. The Financial Times reported that, according to sources familiar with the negotiations, Microsoft is willing to adjust its equity stake in OpenAI&rsquo;s for-profit business in exchange for continued access to AI models developed after 2030. This would allow OpenAI to continue evolving its technology while ensuring Microsoft remains a key player in OpenAI&rsquo;s future.
At the heart of this restructuring is OpenAI&rsquo;s move toward a more conventional model, departing from its nonprofit origins. This shift is necessary to secure the funding needed to accelerate its work on artificial general intelligence (AGI), a field that could revolutionise numerous industries. 
OpenAI&rsquo;s leadership has been under pressure from investors to prioritise financial growth while still maintaining a social impact focus. Consequently, the company is in the process of converting its business arm into a public benefit corporation (PBC), which would allow it to raise additional funds while balancing profit motives with a public mission.
However, this transition is not without its critics. Former employees and other stakeholders have expressed concerns that shifting toward a profit-driven model may compromise OpenAI&rsquo;s commitment to developing AI in a manner that benefits humanity as a whole. Despite these concerns, OpenAI executives remain confident that the changes will pave the way for continued innovation and long-term success.
<h2 dir="ltr">Balancing compliance and values</h2>
As OpenAI moves forward with these structural changes, it faces significant pressure from investors, including Microsoft, to ensure that its new structure meets financial expectations. This challenge gets amplified by OpenAI&rsquo;s need to comply with regulatory oversight. The proposed transition must be evaluated for compliance with laws ensuring that OpenAI&rsquo;s nonprofit mission remains the core value of the company, even as its business arm becomes more profit-oriented.
The shift to a public benefit corporation model is seen as a strategic attempt to balance these competing interests. OpenAI&rsquo;s mission to advance AGI while creating value for investors is a delicate balancing act that could have lasting implications for the company&rsquo;s future. Industry experts warn that failing to implement the proposed changes could stall OpenAI&rsquo;s ability to attract future investment and hinder its long-term ambitions to compete with major tech players like Google.
Ultimately, OpenAI&rsquo;s future hinges on its ability to satisfy both investors and critics, navigating the complexities of its evolving corporate structure while still fulfilling its mission. As Microsoft remains a crucial partner in this venture, the outcome of the ongoing negotiations will determine whether OpenAI can successfully transition to a public entity while safeguarding its core values and mission.
&nbsp;

Business & Economy: The ongoing discussions could transform OpenAI's setup, shifting it from its original nonprofit research focus to a mixed business framework.

ChatGPT maker OpenAI and Microsoft are reworking the terms of their multibillion-dollar partnership in high-stakes negotiations that will enable OpenAI to go public in the future while preserving the software giant’s access to artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the Financial Times reported Sunday. The outcome of these talks could reshape OpenAI's structure, moving it further from its roots as a not-for-profit research organisation into a hybrid business model. The adjustments to the terms of this partnership are pivotal for OpenAI’s continued growth and its ability to tap into funding. A central point of contention in the ongoing negotiations is the equity stake Microsoft will hold in OpenAI’s new for-profit entity in exchange for its investment. Since its initial $1 billion investment in OpenAI in 2019, Microsoft has provided further funding, bringing its total investment to around $13 billion. In return, the software giant has gained access to OpenAI’s cutting-edge AI models and products, which are embedded in Microsoft’s offerings. As OpenAI prepares for an IPO, Microsoft is seeking to maintain its substantial access to AI technology, especially as OpenAI’s ambitions grow beyond current capabilities. Microsoft's priority: AI access The discussions revolve around revising a key contract, which currently runs through 2030, that governs Microsoft’s rights to OpenAI’s intellectual property and the revenue share model. The Financial Times reported that, according to sources familiar with the negotiations, Microsoft is willing to adjust its equity stake in OpenAI’s for-profit business in exchange for continued access to AI models developed after 2030. This would allow OpenAI to continue evolving its technology while ensuring Microsoft remains a key player in OpenAI’s future. At the heart of this restructuring is OpenAI’s move toward a more conventional model, departing from its nonprofit origins. This shift is necessary to secure the funding needed to accelerate its work on artificial general intelligence (AGI), a field that could revolutionise numerous industries. OpenAI’s leadership has been under pressure from investors to prioritise financial growth while still maintaining a social impact focus. Consequently, the company is in the process of converting its business arm into a public benefit corporation (PBC), which would allow it to raise additional funds while balancing profit motives with a public mission. However, this transition is not without its critics. Former employees and other stakeholders have expressed concerns that shifting toward a profit-driven model may compromise OpenAI’s commitment to developing AI in a manner that benefits humanity as a whole. Despite these concerns, OpenAI executives remain confident that the changes will pave the way for continued innovation and long-term success. Balancing compliance and values As OpenAI moves forward with these structural changes, it faces significant pressure from investors, including Microsoft, to ensure that its new structure meets financial expectations. This challenge gets amplified by OpenAI’s need to comply with regulatory oversight. The proposed transition must be evaluated for compliance with laws ensuring that OpenAI’s nonprofit mission remains the core value of the company, even as its business arm becomes more profit-oriented. The shift to a public benefit corporation model is seen as a strategic attempt to balance these competing interests. OpenAI’s mission to advance AGI while creating value for investors is a delicate balancing act that could have lasting implications for the company’s future. Industry experts warn that failing to implement the proposed changes could stall OpenAI’s ability to attract future investment and hinder its long-term ambitions to compete with major tech players like Google. Ultimately, OpenAI’s future hinges on its ability to satisfy both investors and critics, navigating the complexities of its evolving corporate structure while still fulfilling its mission. As Microsoft remains a crucial partner in this venture, the outcome of the ongoing negotiations will determine whether OpenAI can successfully transition to a public entity while safeguarding its core values and mission.

OpenAI negotiates terms with Microsoft for new funding and future IPO

artificial-intelligence

Artificial Intelligence, News on Artificial Intelligence, stories on Artificial Intelligence, articles on Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence stories at Wion, Artificial Intelligence news, Artificial Intelligence latest news

artificial intelligence

AI to impact 20% of existing IT services revenues by FY30: Report

The future of work: Humans and AI side by side

AI could end the world’s dependence on Lithium - Here’s how

AI reveals how social media creators could look like in 2050

ChatGPT faces fresh global outage, users flock to social media with complaints

Gen Z uses AI the most, but it's eating up their jobs in disturbing trend

Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained

Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals

Artificial Intelligence: A teacher's enemy or best friend?

Chinese city, home of DeepSeek, makes AI mandatory in schools

'AI Doomers' sure of doomsday scenario say humanity only has a few years left

Can AI solve Ukraine war? I asked five chatbots the same question and...

AI APOCALYPSE is coming: The bubble of overvalued stocks, underperforming apps will burst soon, but who will survive?

Can artificial intelligence heal a broken heart? The rise of AI therapists

How AI makes Cancer diagnosis easier

Can AI track your online spending better than you can?

Why Elon Musk thinks AI could be humanity’s biggest threat

7 everyday tasks AI does better than humans

xAI co-founder Igor Babuschkin departs to launch AI safety venture

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella says in memo, 'Progress isn't linear. It's dynamic'

Why are people relying on AI for life advice? Experts warn of mental health risk

5 countries using AI to train fighter jet pilots like never before

AI video fools elderly couple into taking a trip to a place that does not exist

Oman cracks down on phone-using drivers with AI surveillance