<p>Dawood Ibrahim's story, intricately entwined within the fabric of Mumbai's criminal underworld, has frequently found its way onto the screens of movies and television, evolving into a legendary narrative firmly ingrained in the collective consciousness of India. Rensil D'Silva's<em> Bambai Meri Jaan </em>is the latest spin on this saga, yet another journey into the seedy underbelly of Mumbai, based on S Hussain Zaidi's <em>Dongri to Dubai: Six Decades of the Mumbai Mafia.</em> But is it worth it?</p>

<p>At the forefront of the series, Kay Kay Menon takes on the role of an honest police officer, a character navigating the treacherous waters of a morally complex world. He is Ismail Kadri, the father of Dara Kadri, inspired by Dawood.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mkTcLd3b_Us?si=6fIzr8OBMZV4mTe2" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>When it comes to crime dramas, the upright cop grappling with a morally foggy landscape is a trope as old as the Mumbai underworld itself. We have witnessed this internal turmoil, the relentless pursuit of justice, and the never-ending battle against a system steeped in corruption time and time again. Yet, when Menon takes on this archetype, there's an undeniable gravity and nuance that transcends the cliché. Menon's mere presence bestows <em>Bambai Meri Jaan </em>with gravitas and sets the bar high for the rest of the series.</p>

<p>One can see the weight of his decisions in the lines on his face, the weariness in his eyes, and the hesitation in his voice. His portrayal doesn't merely scratch the surface of the character's moral dilemmas; it digs deep, allowing viewers to empathise with the internal struggle of a man trying to do right in a world gone wrong. He is akin to James Gordon in <em>Batman Begins,</em> before Batman, well, begins. He carries the same resignation in his gaze. However, in this Indian Gotham, there's no Caped Crusader coming to the rescue.</p>

<p>Also Read |<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-the-nun-ii-review-a-familiar-haunting-633229">&nbsp;The Nun II review: A familiar haunting</a></strong></p>

<p>Yet, even with the undeniable charm of Menon's performance, <em>Bambai Meri Jaan</em> struggles to break free from the shackles of its own genre. It falls into the common pitfall of recycling themes and storylines that have become all too familiar in the world of Indian crime dramas. While the series is based on Zaidi's authoritative account of Mumbai's underworld, it fails to bring a fresh perspective. It's the same old, same old.</p>

<p>The characters' arcs also seem to adhere closely to tried-and-tested formulas, leaving little room for surprise or originality. For viewers who have consumed their fair share of crime series, there is a pervading sense of déjà vu here that is hard to shake off.</p>

<p>Nonetheless, if your primary goal is to be entertained, <em>Bambai Meri Jaan </em>does deliver on that front. It offers a consistent dose of suspense, action, and drama that can keep you engaged throughout its runtime. The pacing ensures that there's always something happening to hold your attention.</p>

<p>The series pays meticulous attention to its production values. The gritty ambience of Mumbai's streets is expertly recreated through meticulous set design and atmospheric cinematography. The city's mood, characterised by its interplay of light and shadow and a darker color palette, contributes to the show's immersive quality. The Bombay of the '60s and '70s is vividly resurrected before your eyes.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Dawood Ibrahim's story, intricately entwined within the fabric of Mumbai's criminal underworld, has frequently found its way onto the screens of movies and television, evolving into a legendary narrative firmly ingrained in the collective consciousness of India.

Dawood Ibrahim's story, intricately entwined within the fabric of Mumbai's criminal underworld, has frequently found its way onto the screens of movies and television, evolving into a legendary narrative firmly ingrained in the collective consciousness of India. Rensil D'Silva's Bambai Meri Jaan is the latest spin on this saga, yet another journey into the seedy underbelly of Mumbai, based on S Hussain Zaidi's Dongri to Dubai: Six Decades of the Mumbai Mafia. But is it worth it? At the forefront of the series, Kay Kay Menon takes on the role of an honest police officer, a character navigating the treacherous waters of a morally complex world. He is Ismail Kadri, the father of Dara Kadri, inspired by Dawood. When it comes to crime dramas, the upright cop grappling with a morally foggy landscape is a trope as old as the Mumbai underworld itself. We have witnessed this internal turmoil, the relentless pursuit of justice, and the never-ending battle against a system steeped in corruption time and time again. Yet, when Menon takes on this archetype, there's an undeniable gravity and nuance that transcends the cliché. Menon's mere presence bestows Bambai Meri Jaan with gravitas and sets the bar high for the rest of the series. One can see the weight of his decisions in the lines on his face, the weariness in his eyes, and the hesitation in his voice. His portrayal doesn't merely scratch the surface of the character's moral dilemmas; it digs deep, allowing viewers to empathise with the internal struggle of a man trying to do right in a world gone wrong. He is akin to James Gordon in Batman Begins, before Batman, well, begins. He carries the same resignation in his gaze. However, in this Indian Gotham, there's no Caped Crusader coming to the rescue. Also Read | The Nun II review: A familiar haunting Yet, even with the undeniable charm of Menon's performance, Bambai Meri Jaan struggles to break free from the shackles of its own genre. It falls into the common pitfall of recycling themes and storylines that have become all too familiar in the world of Indian crime dramas. While the series is based on Zaidi's authoritative account of Mumbai's underworld, it fails to bring a fresh perspective. It's the same old, same old. The characters' arcs also seem to adhere closely to tried-and-tested formulas, leaving little room for surprise or originality. For viewers who have consumed their fair share of crime series, there is a pervading sense of déjà vu here that is hard to shake off. Nonetheless, if your primary goal is to be entertained, Bambai Meri Jaan does deliver on that front. It offers a consistent dose of suspense, action, and drama that can keep you engaged throughout its runtime. The pacing ensures that there's always something happening to hold your attention. The series pays meticulous attention to its production values. The gritty ambience of Mumbai's streets is expertly recreated through meticulous set design and atmospheric cinematography. The city's mood, characterised by its interplay of light and shadow and a darker color palette, contributes to the show's immersive quality. The Bombay of the '60s and '70s is vividly resurrected before your eyes. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Bambai Meri Jaan review: Kay Kay Menon is stellar in a familiar underworld tale

Top Agatha Christie film and TV adaptations ever made

<p>At the outset of WGA strikes in May,&nbsp;late-night TV show hosts like Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers, and others shut down their shows in solidarity with the strike. But now, a&nbsp;decision made by actress and talk show host Drew Barrymore has ignited a fervent debate that resonates far beyond the confines of Tinseltown. As she resolved to resume taping her talk show amidst the cacophony of strikes reverberating through the industry, a contentious question came to the forefront: Is this a permissible act or a breach of the hallowed rules of the Writers Guild of America (WGA)? This enigmatic situation has thrust the legality and ethical considerations surrounding the continuation of talk shows during a writers' strike into the spotlight.</p>

<p>On Sunday, the Writers Guild of America East (WGA East) declared that The Drew Barrymore Show was "struck," indicating that any writing on the show during the strike would be against the rules. In contrast, SAG-AFTRA issued a statement defending Barrymore, asserting that her show is produced under the Network Television Code, a separate contract, and is not struck. They argued that her role as the host does not violate the current strike rules.</p>

<p>This conflict between WGA East and SAG-AFTRA lays the foundation for the ongoing debate over the continuation of talk shows during a strike.</p>

<p>To understand the nuances of this debate, it is crucial to delve deeper into the various elements at play.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/movies-delayed-due-to-strike-in-hollywood-629082/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>The controversy over writing work</strong></h2>

<p>The core of the debate centres around the involvement of writers in these talk shows. Talk shows do have writers, and these writers typically work under the same WGA agreement as film and TV writers. Consequently, during the strike, talk show and game show writers are also on strike, making any contribution of literary material to these shows a breach of WGA rules.</p>

<p>Critics argue that by returning to the air without her writers, Barrymore is essentially ensuring that someone, whether herself, her non-writing producers, or others, will be performing the writing work that WGA writers typically handle. This raises ethical concerns and ignites the controversy over whether talk shows can truly go on during a Hollywood strike without violating the spirit of the strike itself.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained--controversy-around-friends-a-classic-sitcom-or-a-relic-of-a-less-diverse-era-577770">Explained | Controversy around Friends: A classic sitcom or a relic of a less diverse era?</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Understanding the agreements and restrictions</strong></h2>

<p>To understand this situation better, it's important to know that both Barrymore and other talk show hosts, such as Whoopi Goldberg, are members of SAG-AFTRA. However, they operate under a different agreement called "Netcode," which remains in effect and is not currently under negotiation. Despite this, they are still bound by certain restrictions, such as not discussing their film and TV projects on air.</p>

<p>As for guest appearances on talk shows during the strike, individuals can be guests as long as they are not promoting projects they worked on under a struck guild agreement. This means they can promote non-struck work like music, comedy specials, books, or Broadway roles.</p>

<h2><strong>Historical precedents: Lessons from the past</strong></h2>

<p>The current debate over talk shows during strikes isn't happening in a vacuum. History provides us with some precedents to consider.</p>

<p>In 2007, Ellen DeGeneres kept her talk show running despite the WGA strike. She initially went without an opening monologue but eventually resumed it, claiming it was ad-libbed. The WGA though criticised her decision, arguing that her actions ran contrary to the spirit of the strike. On the other hand, AFTRA, which had not yet merged with the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), defended her, citing contractual obligations.</p>

<p>Similar situations occurred with talk show hosts Conan O'Brien and Jay Leno during the same strike. The WGA issued a reminder that nobody was allowed to perform writing services on the shows.</p>

<p>These historical cases serve as a backdrop to the current debate, highlighting the tensions that can arise when talk show hosts and networks make decisions about whether to continue production during labour disputes.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained--why-netflix-might-survive-hollywood-strikes-of-actors-writers-617032">Explained | Why Netflix might survive Hollywood strikes of actors, writers</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>The complexity of the situation</strong></h2>

<p>The debate also raises ethical questions. Is it ethical for a show to continue production during a strike, potentially involving non-WGA writers or other staff in writing work? This dilemma isn't confined to merely talk show hosts; it extends to producers, staff, and even the guests who appear on these shows.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/barbie-to-get-new-post-credits-scene-628742/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>The balancing act: Labour rights vs production continuity</strong></h2>

<p>In essence, the debate over talk shows during Hollywood strikes represents a delicate balancing act between labour rights and the continuity of production. On one side, labour unions like the WGA seek to protect the rights and interests of their members, which includes ensuring that they are not replaced or undermined during strikes. On the other side, networks, producers, and even some unions argue that contractual obligations and the need for content continuity necessitate the continuation of shows.</p>

<p>The ongoing debate highlights the complexity of labour disputes in the American entertainment industry. It underscores the challenges that arise when contractual agreements, strike rules, and ethical considerations collide. In the end, the resolution to this debate may rest on finding a balance between upholding labour rights and ensuring the viability of the entertainment industry as a whole.</p>

<p>As the situation unfolds, it will continue to be closely watched not only by industry insiders but also by those interested in the intersection of labour rights, entertainment, and ethics in Hollywood. The outcome may set a precedent for how future strikes and labour disputes are handled in the world of talk shows and beyond.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


At the outset of WGA strikes in May, late-night TV show hosts like Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers, and others shut down their shows in solidarity with the strike.

At the outset of WGA strikes in May, late-night TV show hosts like Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers, and others shut down their shows in solidarity with the strike. But now, a decision made by actress and talk show host Drew Barrymore has ignited a fervent debate that resonates far beyond the confines of Tinseltown. As she resolved to resume taping her talk show amidst the cacophony of strikes reverberating through the industry, a contentious question came to the forefront: Is this a permissible act or a breach of the hallowed rules of the Writers Guild of America (WGA)? This enigmatic situation has thrust the legality and ethical considerations surrounding the continuation of talk shows during a writers' strike into the spotlight. On Sunday, the Writers Guild of America East (WGA East) declared that The Drew Barrymore Show was "struck," indicating that any writing on the show during the strike would be against the rules. In contrast, SAG-AFTRA issued a statement defending Barrymore, asserting that her show is produced under the Network Television Code, a separate contract, and is not struck. They argued that her role as the host does not violate the current strike rules. This conflict between WGA East and SAG-AFTRA lays the foundation for the ongoing debate over the continuation of talk shows during a strike. To understand the nuances of this debate, it is crucial to delve deeper into the various elements at play. The controversy over writing work The core of the debate centres around the involvement of writers in these talk shows. Talk shows do have writers, and these writers typically work under the same WGA agreement as film and TV writers. Consequently, during the strike, talk show and game show writers are also on strike, making any contribution of literary material to these shows a breach of WGA rules. Critics argue that by returning to the air without her writers, Barrymore is essentially ensuring that someone, whether herself, her non-writing producers, or others, will be performing the writing work that WGA writers typically handle. This raises ethical concerns and ignites the controversy over whether talk shows can truly go on during a Hollywood strike without violating the spirit of the strike itself. Also Read | Explained | Controversy around Friends: A classic sitcom or a relic of a less diverse era? Understanding the agreements and restrictions To understand this situation better, it's important to know that both Barrymore and other talk show hosts, such as Whoopi Goldberg, are members of SAG-AFTRA. However, they operate under a different agreement called "Netcode," which remains in effect and is not currently under negotiation. Despite this, they are still bound by certain restrictions, such as not discussing their film and TV projects on air. As for guest appearances on talk shows during the strike, individuals can be guests as long as they are not promoting projects they worked on under a struck guild agreement. This means they can promote non-struck work like music, comedy specials, books, or Broadway roles. Historical precedents: Lessons from the past The current debate over talk shows during strikes isn't happening in a vacuum. History provides us with some precedents to consider. In 2007, Ellen DeGeneres kept her talk show running despite the WGA strike. She initially went without an opening monologue but eventually resumed it, claiming it was ad-libbed. The WGA though criticised her decision, arguing that her actions ran contrary to the spirit of the strike. On the other hand, AFTRA, which had not yet merged with the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), defended her, citing contractual obligations. Similar situations occurred with talk show hosts Conan O'Brien and Jay Leno during the same strike. The WGA issued a reminder that nobody was allowed to perform writing services on the shows. These historical cases serve as a backdrop to the current debate, highlighting the tensions that can arise when talk show hosts and networks make decisions about whether to continue production during labour disputes. Also Read | Explained | Why Netflix might survive Hollywood strikes of actors, writers The complexity of the situation The debate also raises ethical questions. Is it ethical for a show to continue production during a strike, potentially involving non-WGA writers or other staff in writing work? This dilemma isn't confined to merely talk show hosts; it extends to producers, staff, and even the guests who appear on these shows. The balancing act: Labour rights vs production continuity In essence, the debate over talk shows during Hollywood strikes represents a delicate balancing act between labour rights and the continuity of production. On one side, labour unions like the WGA seek to protect the rights and interests of their members, which includes ensuring that they are not replaced or undermined during strikes. On the other side, networks, producers, and even some unions argue that contractual obligations and the need for content continuity necessitate the continuation of shows. The ongoing debate highlights the complexity of labour disputes in the American entertainment industry. It underscores the challenges that arise when contractual agreements, strike rules, and ethical considerations collide. In the end, the resolution to this debate may rest on finding a balance between upholding labour rights and ensuring the viability of the entertainment industry as a whole. As the situation unfolds, it will continue to be closely watched not only by industry insiders but also by those interested in the intersection of labour rights, entertainment, and ethics in Hollywood. The outcome may set a precedent for how future strikes and labour disputes are handled in the world of talk shows and beyond. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Explained: Is it possible for talk shows to go on amid strikes in Hollywood? The ethical and legal dilemmas

<p>Oscar-winning actress Kate Winslet can currently be seen in <em>Lee</em>, a British biographical drama film directed by debutante Ellen Kuras. It is about Lee Miller. While the film does not have a release date yet, either streaming or theatrical, it got its world premiere at the ongoing 2023 Toronto International Film Festival on September 10 in the Official Selection category. Miller lived a fascinating life, so much so that it makes one glad that there is finally a film about her, and starring an actress of Winslet's calibre. The film explores the complex and multifaceted life of this remarkable woman, and early reviews are positive.</p>

<p>So who was Lee Miller? She was an American photographer, model, and artist. She is best known for her contributions to the field of photography, particularly her work as a war correspondent and fashion photographer during World War II. Here is her life story in brief.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/LEE?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#LEE</a> starring Kate Winslet as war correspondent Lee Miller is the best performance of her career. <a href="https://t.co/tF8JdPreWw">pic.twitter.com/tF8JdPreWw</a></p>
— Baz Bamigboye @Deadline (@BazBam) <a href="https://twitter.com/BazBam/status/1700662581344575636?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>Early Life and modelling career</strong></h2>

<p>Lee Miller was born on April 23, 1907, in Poughkeepsie, New York, USA. She began her career as a model and muse in the 1920s, working with renowned photographers such as Edward Steichen and Man Ray. She was known for her striking beauty and distinctive style, and her image graced the covers of fashion magazines like Vogue.</p>

<h2><strong>Photography career</strong></h2>

<p>However, Miller's talents extended far beyond modelling. She had a keen interest in photography and became an apprentice to Man Ray in Paris. Under his guidance, she developed her skills as a photographer and started creating her own works, which often blended Surrealism and avant-garde styles. Some of her notable works include experimental and surrealist photographs that pushed the boundaries of conventional photography.</p>

<p>Miller became a war correspondent for Vogue magazine, a highly unusual role for a woman at the time. She was assigned to cover various aspects of the war, from the frontlines to the homefront. Her photographs during this period provided a unique and often unfiltered perspective on the conflict.</p>

<p>Miller's lens captured the daily lives of soldiers on both the Allied and Axis sides. Her photographs not only showed the heroism and camaraderie of soldiers but also the fatigue, fear, and vulnerability they experienced during the war. She had a remarkable ability to capture candid moments that revealed the humanity of those involved in the conflict.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Kate Winslet as Lee Miller recreating the iconic picture in Hitler's bathtub. <a href="https://t.co/zNCNwBrt6i">pic.twitter.com/zNCNwBrt6i</a></p>
— Kate Winslet Updates (@UpdatesWinslet) <a href="https://twitter.com/UpdatesWinslet/status/1701211357079552332?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>One of the most powerful and haunting aspects of Miller's work during World War II was her documentation of the Holocaust and the liberation of concentration camps. She was among the first photographers to enter and document the horrors of the Dachau and Buchenwald concentration camps. Her photographs from these camps are searing images of the suffering endured by the survivors and the evidence of the atrocities committed by the Nazis. These images played a crucial role in bearing witness to the Holocaust and ensuring that the world did not forget the horrors that had occurred.</p>

<h2>Iconic bathtub photograph</h2>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Vogue model, war correspondent and combat photographer: Elizabeth "Lee" Miller in Hitler's bathtub, 1945.<br />
<br />
“On the floor are her boots, covered with the filth of Dachau, which she has trodden all over Hitler’s bathroom floor. She is saying she is the victor”, her son said. <a href="https://t.co/HWi9yKncD6">pic.twitter.com/HWi9yKncD6</a></p>
— Marina Amaral (@marinamaral2) <a href="https://twitter.com/marinamaral2/status/1341852796749045761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 23, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Perhaps one of Miller's most famous and iconic photographs was taken in the immediate aftermath of World War II. In April 1945, shortly after the liberation of Munich, Germany, Miller entered Adolf Hitler's apartment, and she was famously photographed taking a bath in his bathtub. This photograph, often referred to as the "Hitler's Bathtub" or "Lee Miller in Hitler's Bathtub," is a striking symbol of the defeat of the Nazi regime. It represents a bold and defiant statement against the atrocities committed by Hitler and the Third Reich. This image remains a powerful and evocative representation of the triumph over tyranny.</p>

<h2>Post-World War II and later life</h2>

<p>After the war, Lee Miller continued her photography career and covered various subjects, including fashion and travel. She also married British surrealist artist Roland Penrose. Miller's work has been celebrated for its artistic and documentary value. Her photographs are in the collections of major art institutions, and her legacy continues to influence photographers and artists to this day.</p>

<p>She passed away on July 21, 1977, but her work continues to be remembered and admired.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Oscar-winning actress Kate Winslet can currently be seen in Lee, a British biographical drama film directed by debutante Ellen Kuras. It is about Lee Miller. While the film does not have a release date yet, either streaming or theatrical, it got its world premiere at the ongoing 2023 Toronto International Film Festival on September 10 in the Official Selection category.

Oscar-winning actress Kate Winslet can currently be seen in Lee, a British biographical drama film directed by debutante Ellen Kuras. It is about Lee Miller. While the film does not have a release date yet, either streaming or theatrical, it got its world premiere at the ongoing 2023 Toronto International Film Festival on September 10 in the Official Selection category. Miller lived a fascinating life, so much so that it makes one glad that there is finally a film about her, and starring an actress of Winslet's calibre. The film explores the complex and multifaceted life of this remarkable woman, and early reviews are positive. So who was Lee Miller? She was an American photographer, model, and artist. She is best known for her contributions to the field of photography, particularly her work as a war correspondent and fashion photographer during World War II. Here is her life story in brief. #LEE starring Kate Winslet as war correspondent Lee Miller is the best performance of her career. pic.twitter.com/tF8JdPreWw — Baz Bamigboye @Deadline (@BazBam) September 10, 2023 × Early Life and modelling career Lee Miller was born on April 23, 1907, in Poughkeepsie, New York, USA. She began her career as a model and muse in the 1920s, working with renowned photographers such as Edward Steichen and Man Ray. She was known for her striking beauty and distinctive style, and her image graced the covers of fashion magazines like Vogue. Photography career However, Miller's talents extended far beyond modelling. She had a keen interest in photography and became an apprentice to Man Ray in Paris. Under his guidance, she developed her skills as a photographer and started creating her own works, which often blended Surrealism and avant-garde styles. Some of her notable works include experimental and surrealist photographs that pushed the boundaries of conventional photography. Miller became a war correspondent for Vogue magazine, a highly unusual role for a woman at the time. She was assigned to cover various aspects of the war, from the frontlines to the homefront. Her photographs during this period provided a unique and often unfiltered perspective on the conflict. Miller's lens captured the daily lives of soldiers on both the Allied and Axis sides. Her photographs not only showed the heroism and camaraderie of soldiers but also the fatigue, fear, and vulnerability they experienced during the war. She had a remarkable ability to capture candid moments that revealed the humanity of those involved in the conflict. Kate Winslet as Lee Miller recreating the iconic picture in Hitler's bathtub. pic.twitter.com/zNCNwBrt6i — Kate Winslet Updates (@UpdatesWinslet) September 11, 2023 × One of the most powerful and haunting aspects of Miller's work during World War II was her documentation of the Holocaust and the liberation of concentration camps. She was among the first photographers to enter and document the horrors of the Dachau and Buchenwald concentration camps. Her photographs from these camps are searing images of the suffering endured by the survivors and the evidence of the atrocities committed by the Nazis. These images played a crucial role in bearing witness to the Holocaust and ensuring that the world did not forget the horrors that had occurred. Iconic bathtub photograph Vogue model, war correspondent and combat photographer: Elizabeth "Lee" Miller in Hitler's bathtub, 1945. “On the floor are her boots, covered with the filth of Dachau, which she has trodden all over Hitler’s bathroom floor. She is saying she is the victor”, her son said. pic.twitter.com/HWi9yKncD6 — Marina Amaral (@marinamaral2) December 23, 2020 × Perhaps one of Miller's most famous and iconic photographs was taken in the immediate aftermath of World War II. In April 1945, shortly after the liberation of Munich, Germany, Miller entered Adolf Hitler's apartment, and she was famously photographed taking a bath in his bathtub. This photograph, often referred to as the "Hitler's Bathtub" or "Lee Miller in Hitler's Bathtub," is a striking symbol of the defeat of the Nazi regime. It represents a bold and defiant statement against the atrocities committed by Hitler and the Third Reich. This image remains a powerful and evocative representation of the triumph over tyranny. Post-World War II and later life After the war, Lee Miller continued her photography career and covered various subjects, including fashion and travel. She also married British surrealist artist Roland Penrose. Miller's work has been celebrated for its artistic and documentary value. Her photographs are in the collections of major art institutions, and her legacy continues to influence photographers and artists to this day. She passed away on July 21, 1977, but her work continues to be remembered and admired. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Mee Lee Miller: The trailblazing photographer portrayed by Kate Winslet in Lee

<p>They say that age is merely a number, and that might or might not be true. Nonetheless, as Hugh Grant marks his 63rd birthday today, it's abundantly evident that the passing years have failed to diminish his brilliance. While the charming Brit is famous for his endearing romantic comedies like<em> Notting Hill</em>, it's his role as Phoenix Buchanan in Paul King's <em>Paddington 2,</em> I believe, that truly highlights the depths of his talent.</p>

<h2><strong>Phoenix Buchanan, an absurdly entertaining villain</strong></h2>

<p>In this delightful family flick, Grant takes on the role of Phoenix Buchanan, a former theatre star turned hammy villain with a penchant for costume changes that would put a Broadway diva to shame. Each transformation, from a nun to a knight, isn't merely a visual change; it's a complete embodiment of a different character, making his journey through the fanciful world of Paddington Bear thoroughly enjoyable.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/reyeX6ajeUw?si=nvG82VNOg8aqVaTa" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>Grant brings a delightful, charismatic quality to his character's villainy. He is not the run-of-the-mill antagonist; he is an egotistical, washed-up actor with a knack for disguises, and he is extremely eager to regain his former glory. The praise must also go to the script by King and Simon Farnaby that lays the perfect foundation for Grant's theatrical antics. The role was clearly written with the actor in mind. No other actor could possibly encapsulate this weirdo.</p>

<p>The portrayal is so amazingly over-the-top that it is like watching a Shakespearean actor moonlighting as a thief in a fancy dressing room. With each sly grin, exaggerated gesture, and theatrical line delivery, Grant reminds us that he is not just an actor; he is a maestro of the absurd. He embraces the utter impossibility of his character with such gusto that you can't help but root for the lovable scoundrel, even when he is up to his nefarious deeds.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-how-chris-pines-hell-or-high-water-performance-seals-his-status-as-the-best-chris-629386">How Chris Pine's Hell or High Water performance seals his status as the best Chris</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>A sense of vulnerability</strong></h2>

<p>But it's not all flash and flair. Grant also infuses Phoenix Buchanan with a dash of vulnerability, revealing the cracks in the facade of this larger-than-life character. It's as if he's saying, "Sure, I may steal rare books and dress up as a nun, but deep down, I'm just a guy looking for a little validation."</p>

<p>The comedic timing is impeccable, adding layers of humour to an already witty film. His interactions with the titular lovable bear, Paddington, provide some of the movie's most memorable moments.</p>

<p>In a film filled with warmth and whimsy, Grant's performance shines as a masterclass in creating a fresh, memorable antagonist. He skilfully balances charm, humour, and cunning, making Phoenix a character you simultaneously adore and despise.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


They say that age is merely a number, and that might or might not be true. Nonetheless, as Hugh Grant marks his 63rd birthday today, it's abundantly evident that the passing years have failed to diminish his brilliance.

They say that age is merely a number, and that might or might not be true. Nonetheless, as Hugh Grant marks his 63rd birthday today, it's abundantly evident that the passing years have failed to diminish his brilliance. While the charming Brit is famous for his endearing romantic comedies like Notting Hill, it's his role as Phoenix Buchanan in Paul King's Paddington 2, I believe, that truly highlights the depths of his talent. Phoenix Buchanan, an absurdly entertaining villain In this delightful family flick, Grant takes on the role of Phoenix Buchanan, a former theatre star turned hammy villain with a penchant for costume changes that would put a Broadway diva to shame. Each transformation, from a nun to a knight, isn't merely a visual change; it's a complete embodiment of a different character, making his journey through the fanciful world of Paddington Bear thoroughly enjoyable. Grant brings a delightful, charismatic quality to his character's villainy. He is not the run-of-the-mill antagonist; he is an egotistical, washed-up actor with a knack for disguises, and he is extremely eager to regain his former glory. The praise must also go to the script by King and Simon Farnaby that lays the perfect foundation for Grant's theatrical antics. The role was clearly written with the actor in mind. No other actor could possibly encapsulate this weirdo. The portrayal is so amazingly over-the-top that it is like watching a Shakespearean actor moonlighting as a thief in a fancy dressing room. With each sly grin, exaggerated gesture, and theatrical line delivery, Grant reminds us that he is not just an actor; he is a maestro of the absurd. He embraces the utter impossibility of his character with such gusto that you can't help but root for the lovable scoundrel, even when he is up to his nefarious deeds. Also Read | How Chris Pine's Hell or High Water performance seals his status as the best Chris A sense of vulnerability But it's not all flash and flair. Grant also infuses Phoenix Buchanan with a dash of vulnerability, revealing the cracks in the facade of this larger-than-life character. It's as if he's saying, "Sure, I may steal rare books and dress up as a nun, but deep down, I'm just a guy looking for a little validation." The comedic timing is impeccable, adding layers of humour to an already witty film. His interactions with the titular lovable bear, Paddington, provide some of the movie's most memorable moments. In a film filled with warmth and whimsy, Grant's performance shines as a masterclass in creating a fresh, memorable antagonist. He skilfully balances charm, humour, and cunning, making Phoenix a character you simultaneously adore and despise. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Hugh Grant in Paddington 2: A maestro of the absurd

<p>Akshay Kumar, the Khiladi of Bollywood, has turned 56. Today, it's inevitable to ponder the intriguing twist his career took after he embraced the wave of nationalism. While acknowledging his versatility as an actor, one can't help but wonder if he should have adhered to his strength — comedy.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Picture this: It's the late '90s and early 2000s, and Akshay is the undisputed king of comedy in Bollywood. Okay, maybe not the king, but one of the kings, anyway. From <em>Hera Pheri</em> to <em>Mujhse Shaadi Karogi</em>, he had us in splits with his impeccable timing and hilarious antics. Unlike other top stars, he was not afraid to look like a fool in his films. For quite some time, he was the go-to guy for those feel-good, light-hearted entertainers coming from directors like Priyadarshan. Everyone loved his goofy charm, and there was no doubt that comedy, and not action as it was previously believed, was his forte.</p>

<h2>When Akshay Kumar rode the nationalism wave</h2>

<p>But then came a twist in the tale. Somewhere around the mid-2010s, Akshay decided to don the mantle of a patriotic Indian. He began starring in films like <em>Baby</em>, <em>Airlift</em>, and <em>Kesari</em>, where he portrayed the valiant Indian hero ready to rescue the nation from every conceivable crisis using whatever means possible. It was as if he had traded in his comic timing for a tricolour superhero cape.</p>

<p>Now, there's nothing wrong with making films about patriotism, but it seemed like Akshay was trying a bit too hard to be the poster boy for all things nationalist. Also, the thing with riding a wave like this is it will only take you so far. These waves die just as quickly as they rise.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Also, it's not that Akshay's patriotic films were bad; in fact, some of them were well-made, and comedy or not, it must be admitted that Akshay is a pretty great actor. Often, he alone made them worth watching. But there was a certain charm and magic in his comedy that was missing in these roles.&nbsp;</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/the-chronicles-of-greta-gerwig-with-netflix-612372/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Are Akshay Kumar's 'nationalistic' films responsible for the decline in his career?</h2>

<p>Several of the last few films of Akshay, in which he had a starring role, have been flops. The decline of Akshay's career, I feel, can be attributed to his overenthusiastic embrace of nationalism in films. He went from making us laugh uncontrollably to making us feel patriotic, which isn't a bad thing, but it's not what we expected from him. His foray into this genre resulted in a certain predictability, a sense that we knew what to expect from his films — lots of flag-waving, chest-beating, and maybe a few goosebump-inducing dialogues.</p>

<p>Perhaps, it's time for him to reconsider his choices. We miss the goofy Akshay.</p>

<p>While Akshay's journey from comedy to nationalism might have been well-intentioned, it left many of us yearning for the days when he made us laugh till our sides hurt. On his birthday, let's hope he rediscovers the joy of comedy and treats us to more rib-tickling performances. After all, in a world where laughter is the best medicine, Akshay is one of Bollywood's best doctors.</p>

<p>Happy Birthday, Khiladi! May your funny bone reign supreme once again.<br />
&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Akshay Kumar, the Khiladi of Bollywood, has turned 56. Today, it's inevitable to ponder the intriguing twist his career took after he embraced the wave of nationalism.

Akshay Kumar, the Khiladi of Bollywood, has turned 56. Today, it's inevitable to ponder the intriguing twist his career took after he embraced the wave of nationalism. While acknowledging his versatility as an actor, one can't help but wonder if he should have adhered to his strength — comedy. Picture this: It's the late '90s and early 2000s, and Akshay is the undisputed king of comedy in Bollywood. Okay, maybe not the king, but one of the kings, anyway. From Hera Pheri to Mujhse Shaadi Karogi, he had us in splits with his impeccable timing and hilarious antics. Unlike other top stars, he was not afraid to look like a fool in his films. For quite some time, he was the go-to guy for those feel-good, light-hearted entertainers coming from directors like Priyadarshan. Everyone loved his goofy charm, and there was no doubt that comedy, and not action as it was previously believed, was his forte. When Akshay Kumar rode the nationalism wave But then came a twist in the tale. Somewhere around the mid-2010s, Akshay decided to don the mantle of a patriotic Indian. He began starring in films like Baby, Airlift, and Kesari, where he portrayed the valiant Indian hero ready to rescue the nation from every conceivable crisis using whatever means possible. It was as if he had traded in his comic timing for a tricolour superhero cape. Now, there's nothing wrong with making films about patriotism, but it seemed like Akshay was trying a bit too hard to be the poster boy for all things nationalist. Also, the thing with riding a wave like this is it will only take you so far. These waves die just as quickly as they rise. Also, it's not that Akshay's patriotic films were bad; in fact, some of them were well-made, and comedy or not, it must be admitted that Akshay is a pretty great actor. Often, he alone made them worth watching. But there was a certain charm and magic in his comedy that was missing in these roles. Are Akshay Kumar's 'nationalistic' films responsible for the decline in his career? Several of the last few films of Akshay, in which he had a starring role, have been flops. The decline of Akshay's career, I feel, can be attributed to his overenthusiastic embrace of nationalism in films. He went from making us laugh uncontrollably to making us feel patriotic, which isn't a bad thing, but it's not what we expected from him. His foray into this genre resulted in a certain predictability, a sense that we knew what to expect from his films — lots of flag-waving, chest-beating, and maybe a few goosebump-inducing dialogues. Perhaps, it's time for him to reconsider his choices. We miss the goofy Akshay. While Akshay's journey from comedy to nationalism might have been well-intentioned, it left many of us yearning for the days when he made us laugh till our sides hurt. On his birthday, let's hope he rediscovers the joy of comedy and treats us to more rib-tickling performances. After all, in a world where laughter is the best medicine, Akshay is one of Bollywood's best doctors. Happy Birthday, Khiladi! May your funny bone reign supreme once again. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Happy Birthday, Akshay Kumar: Should he return to making us laugh?

<p>Shah Rukh Khan, Bollywood's reigning monarch, has once again showcased why he's an enduring legend in the Indian film industry with <em>Jawan</em>. In 2021, his son Aryan Khan became embroiled in a high-profile legal battle stemming from his arrest during an alleged rave party on a cruise ship. He had to suffer 25 days of confinement, facing the daunting spectre of serious allegations. However, the narrative took a turn for the better in May 2022 when he was exonerated of all charges, with India's Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) admitting a flawed investigation. All this while, King Khan opted to remain&nbsp;silent, choosing, perhaps, to speak through his work.&nbsp;</p>

<p>It's in this context that a particular line from <em>Jawan </em>resonates: "Bete ko haath lagane se pahle, baap se baat kar." Heh. Clearly, he has had enough. The line was also notably highlighted in the film's trailers.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-jawan-review-shah-rukh-khan-cements-his-position-as-numero-uno-with-this-vigilante-thriller-633248">Jawan review: Shah Rukh Khan cements his position as numero uno with this vigilante thriller</a></strong></p>

<p>Anyhoo: <em>Pathaan</em>, released earlier in the year, heralded Shah Rukh Khan's triumphant return to the silver screen. The film not only garnered effusive critical acclaim but also stormed the box office, underscoring that SRK's magic remained as appealing as ever. As someone who wasn't particularly smitten with a lot of his previous work, this movie was a revelation. It wasn't just a movie; it was the triumphant return of Shah Rukh as a bona fide movie star. Sure, it was also your typical crowd-pleasing Indian masala movie but I have made my peace with those.</p>

<p>It is with <em>Jawan</em>, however, that Shah Rukh Khan truly solidifies his place as the star of the year 2023, I feel. It is bigger, shinier, and more glorious. While it may not be a cinematic masterpiece by traditional standards, it does shine a spotlight on the quintessential movie star that SRK is. As a newfound fan, I find myself eagerly celebrating his remarkable resurgence.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/shah-rukh-khan-is-back-with-a-bang-in-jawan-critically-speaking-633394/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p><strong>Minor spoilers ahead</strong></p>

<h2><strong>What is <em>Jawan </em>all about?</strong></h2>

<p>Directed by Atlee, the film features Khan in a dual role, supported by an exceptional ensemble cast including Nayanthara, Vijay Sethupathi, Priyamani, and Sanya Malhotra. Khan's first character Azad is a jailer who masterminds daring heists executed by a cadre of female inmates, all driven by a higher purpose who have had to face injustice. Azad's gang confronts the government on pressing issues that plague Indians. These are the critical problems that often go unnoticed or unaddressed like farmer suicides, the deplorable state of government hospitals, the intricate web of corruption that often exists between businessmen and politicians, and so on.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Azad's motive is simple. He wants to prove how quickly things for common people can improve when it is the establishment that feels the heat, rather than common people. Hospitals, for instance, are miraculously transformed into modern, well-equipped facilities in a matter of few hours with world-class infrastructure when sordid secrets of those in power are exposed. This is something most of us know, of course, but it's gratifying to witness it unfold in a popular movie of this nature.</p>

<p>Azad is eventually caught and tortured by the brother of one such unscrupulous businessman Kaalie Gaikwad (Vijay Sethupathi, reliably brilliant in this scenery-chewing role). And that is when Vikram Rathore, played by SRK again rescues him and beats his captors to death in the most stylish way possible. I leave you to uncover the nature of Azad and Vikram's relationship.&nbsp;Probably you already know.</p>

<h2><strong>Deepika Padukone, Nayanthara, and Sanya Malhotra</strong></h2>

<p>The film boasts of some serious women's power as well. Deepika delivers a standout performance in a role that falls somewhere between a cameo and a starring role. Deepika being Deepika, though, she makes every moment count. She and SRK are old friends (she made her Hindi film debut opposite him in Om Shanti Om) and her chemistry with him is palpable. Nayanthara's performance is marked by an innate and effortless grace. Sanya Malhotra also gets her moment to shine as a helpless doctor in a heart-wrenching scene in an ill-equipped hospital. &nbsp;</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/jawan-craze-grips-india-srks-latest-films-hits-screens-633404/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>Action is truly spectacular</strong></h2>

<p>The action sequences in <em>Jawan </em>undoubtedly hold their own, elevated by some truly spectacular visual effects. The filmmakers have spared no expense in delivering heart-pounding, larger-than-life action moments that keep you on the edge of your seat. It's the kind of cinematic experience, of course, where you have to temporarily suspend disbelief, fully aware that the hero seems invulnerable while others meet their fate around him. But, as I mentioned earlier, I've come to terms with the phenomenon of Indian masala films.</p>

<p>While the action is undeniably thrilling, there is one aspect that occasionally puts me off — the copious use of slow motion. Too uncomfortably reminscent of Zack Snyder for me. It's a stylistic choice that can sometimes feel excessive and elongate sequences unnecessarily. Nevertheless, it doesn't detract significantly from the overall enjoyment of the film.</p>

<h2><strong>Watch <em>Jawan </em>if you haven't already</strong></h2>

<p>And there you have it. Watching Shah Rukh Khan in his element, whether he's orchestrating cinematic ballets of boundless buoyancy or delivering poignant soliloquies that resonate with the soul, is nothing short of mesmerising. He possesses that rare star power that transcends the screen.</p>

<p>Even after more than three decades in the industry, Shah Rukh Khan remains an indomitable presence, and his charisma retains its magnetic allure.</p>

<p><strong>(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)</strong></p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Shah Rukh Khan, Bollywood's reigning monarch, has once again showcased why he's an enduring legend in the Indian film industry with Jawan. In 2021, his son Aryan Khan became embroiled in a high-profile legal battle stemming from his arrest during an alleged rave party on a cruise ship.

Shah Rukh Khan, Bollywood's reigning monarch, has once again showcased why he's an enduring legend in the Indian film industry with Jawan. In 2021, his son Aryan Khan became embroiled in a high-profile legal battle stemming from his arrest during an alleged rave party on a cruise ship. He had to suffer 25 days of confinement, facing the daunting spectre of serious allegations. However, the narrative took a turn for the better in May 2022 when he was exonerated of all charges, with India's Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) admitting a flawed investigation. All this while, King Khan opted to remain silent, choosing, perhaps, to speak through his work. It's in this context that a particular line from Jawan resonates: "Bete ko haath lagane se pahle, baap se baat kar." Heh. Clearly, he has had enough. The line was also notably highlighted in the film's trailers. Also Read | Jawan review: Shah Rukh Khan cements his position as numero uno with this vigilante thriller Anyhoo: Pathaan, released earlier in the year, heralded Shah Rukh Khan's triumphant return to the silver screen. The film not only garnered effusive critical acclaim but also stormed the box office, underscoring that SRK's magic remained as appealing as ever. As someone who wasn't particularly smitten with a lot of his previous work, this movie was a revelation. It wasn't just a movie; it was the triumphant return of Shah Rukh as a bona fide movie star. Sure, it was also your typical crowd-pleasing Indian masala movie but I have made my peace with those. It is with Jawan, however, that Shah Rukh Khan truly solidifies his place as the star of the year 2023, I feel. It is bigger, shinier, and more glorious. While it may not be a cinematic masterpiece by traditional standards, it does shine a spotlight on the quintessential movie star that SRK is. As a newfound fan, I find myself eagerly celebrating his remarkable resurgence. Minor spoilers ahead What is Jawan all about? Directed by Atlee, the film features Khan in a dual role, supported by an exceptional ensemble cast including Nayanthara, Vijay Sethupathi, Priyamani, and Sanya Malhotra. Khan's first character Azad is a jailer who masterminds daring heists executed by a cadre of female inmates, all driven by a higher purpose who have had to face injustice. Azad's gang confronts the government on pressing issues that plague Indians. These are the critical problems that often go unnoticed or unaddressed like farmer suicides, the deplorable state of government hospitals, the intricate web of corruption that often exists between businessmen and politicians, and so on. Azad's motive is simple. He wants to prove how quickly things for common people can improve when it is the establishment that feels the heat, rather than common people. Hospitals, for instance, are miraculously transformed into modern, well-equipped facilities in a matter of few hours with world-class infrastructure when sordid secrets of those in power are exposed. This is something most of us know, of course, but it's gratifying to witness it unfold in a popular movie of this nature. Azad is eventually caught and tortured by the brother of one such unscrupulous businessman Kaalie Gaikwad (Vijay Sethupathi, reliably brilliant in this scenery-chewing role). And that is when Vikram Rathore, played by SRK again rescues him and beats his captors to death in the most stylish way possible. I leave you to uncover the nature of Azad and Vikram's relationship. Probably you already know. Deepika Padukone, Nayanthara, and Sanya Malhotra The film boasts of some serious women's power as well. Deepika delivers a standout performance in a role that falls somewhere between a cameo and a starring role. Deepika being Deepika, though, she makes every moment count. She and SRK are old friends (she made her Hindi film debut opposite him in Om Shanti Om) and her chemistry with him is palpable. Nayanthara's performance is marked by an innate and effortless grace. Sanya Malhotra also gets her moment to shine as a helpless doctor in a heart-wrenching scene in an ill-equipped hospital. Action is truly spectacular The action sequences in Jawan undoubtedly hold their own, elevated by some truly spectacular visual effects. The filmmakers have spared no expense in delivering heart-pounding, larger-than-life action moments that keep you on the edge of your seat. It's the kind of cinematic experience, of course, where you have to temporarily suspend disbelief, fully aware that the hero seems invulnerable while others meet their fate around him. But, as I mentioned earlier, I've come to terms with the phenomenon of Indian masala films. While the action is undeniably thrilling, there is one aspect that occasionally puts me off — the copious use of slow motion. Too uncomfortably reminscent of Zack Snyder for me. It's a stylistic choice that can sometimes feel excessive and elongate sequences unnecessarily. Nevertheless, it doesn't detract significantly from the overall enjoyment of the film. Watch Jawan if you haven't already And there you have it. Watching Shah Rukh Khan in his element, whether he's orchestrating cinematic ballets of boundless buoyancy or delivering poignant soliloquies that resonate with the soul, is nothing short of mesmerising. He possesses that rare star power that transcends the screen. Even after more than three decades in the industry, Shah Rukh Khan remains an indomitable presence, and his charisma retains its magnetic allure. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.) WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Shah Rukh Khan in Jawan: Bollywood's reigning monarch strikes gold yet again

<p>In the world of late-night television, <em>The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon</em> has long been celebrated for its humour and entertainment value. However, recent revelations from over a dozen current and former employees in a Rolling Stone exposé suggest a stark contrast between the cheerful on-screen persona of host Jimmy Fallon and the harsh reality of the show's behind-the-scenes dynamics. Let's delve into the details of the reported toxic workplace environment at <em>The Tonight Show</em>, shedding light on its origins, effects, and calls for change. What is the whole shebang all about? We explain.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/jimmy-fallon-apologises-to-tonight-show-staff-its-embarrassing-633524">Jimmy Fallon apologises after allegations of difficult work environment: 'It’s embarrassing'</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Who is Jimmy Fallon?</strong></h2>

<p>Born James Thomas Fallon on September 19, 1974, in Brooklyn, New York, he is one of the most beloved entertainers in the industry. His ascent to late-night television stardom began with his standout performances on Saturday Night Live (SNL) in 1998. His impressions and comedic talents made him a fan favorite. After SNL, he ventured into film and TV roles, eventually hosting Late Night with Jimmy Fallon in 2009. His tenure was marked by innovative segments and collaborations, solidifying his reputation as a versatile entertainer. In 2014, he took over as host of <em>The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon</em> where his relatable and energetic style, along with viral digital content, has reshaped late-night TV.&nbsp;</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/the-tonight-show-host-jimmy-fallon-accused-of-creating-toxic-work-environment-633559/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Snippets from a "bad Jimmy day"</h2>

<p>The atmosphere on the set of the show is usually characterised by warmth and congeniality, mirroring the host's amiable on-screen presence. However, as Rolling Stone reports, there are distinct "good Jimmy days" and "bad Jimmy days." One former employee recalls a particularly tense day in 2017 when Fallon's erratic behaviour during production meetings and rehearsal left many concerned about the show's future.</p>

<p>Many reported witnessing Fallon's unpredictability, including snapping at crew members, berating colleagues, and expressing irritation over minor issues. The pervasive fear of his mood swings created a stifling atmosphere, where employees walked on eggshells.</p>

<h2>Toxic environment and its adverse impact</h2>

<p>According to the accounts of two current and 14 former staffers, this toxic work environment has been festering for years. This is said to have influenced the show's ever-changing leadership teams. Nine showrunners in nine years have struggled to manage the challenges posed by Fallon's management style.</p>

<p>Seven former employees revealed that their mental health suffered while working on <em>The Tonight Show</em>. Dark jokes about self-harm were commonplace, and some would seek refuge in what they referred to as "crying rooms." These revelations underline the severe toll that the toxic work environment took on the show's staff.</p>

<p>Rumours about Fallon's relationship with alcohol have circulated for years. While he has denied these allegations, multiple employees claimed to have witnessed him seemingly inebriated at work. Smells of alcohol on his breath were reported on several occasions, causing concern among staff.</p>

<p>Employees expressed disillusionment with the Human Resources department as well, citing incidents where colleagues who approached HR were subsequently fired. HR was often seen as unhelpful, and many felt their concerns were not addressed effectively.</p>

<p>Working on <em>The Tonight Show </em>often took a toll on mental health of staffers. Anxiety attacks, weight loss, hair thinning, and weakened nail beds were common among staff members. Multiple employees sought therapy, and some even experienced suicidal thoughts due to the hostile work environment, as per the Rolling Stone report.</p>

<p>Employees recounted instances of Fallon's questionable conduct, including sending passive-aggressive feedback notes that felt like personal insults rather than constructive criticism. Witnesses also remembered an uncomfortable incident with comedian Jerry Seinfeld, where Fallon scolded a cue-card production member in the middle of a taping.</p>

<h2>Silent witnesses and fear of retaliation</h2>

<p>The fear of retaliation is palpable among those who spoke to Rolling Stone, many of whom requested anonymity. Their positions within the show varied, ranging from production crew members to office staffers and writers. Some left voluntarily due to their deteriorating mental health, while others claim they were fired. Their reluctance to speak out reflects the pervasive culture of fear that has taken root within the show.</p>

<h2>NBC's response&nbsp;</h2>

<p>In response, NBC where the show airs said in a statement, "We are incredibly proud of<em> The Tonight Show</em>, and providing a respectful working environment is a top priority. As in any workplace, we have had employees raise issues; those have been investigated and action has been taken where appropriate. As is always the case, we encourage employees who feel they have experienced or observed behaviour inconsistent with our policies to report their concerns so that we may address them accordingly.”</p>

<h2>Jimmy Fallon's apology</h2>

<p>In a subsequent Rolling Stone article, Fallon expressed his remorse during a Zoom call, admitting that he never intended to cultivate an uncomfortable atmosphere for his colleagues. He extended his apologies to his coworkers and their loved ones. Fallon conveyed his aspiration for The Tonight Show to be an enjoyable and all-encompassing programme, committed to making it the finest show possible.</p>

<p>According to the employees mentioned by Rolling Stone, he conveyed, "It’s embarrassing and I feel so bad. Sorry if I embarrassed you and your family and friends… I feel so bad I can’t even tell you. I want the show to be fun, [it] should be inclusive to everybody. It should be the best show.”</p>

<p>The Ellen way: Will The Tonight Show survive this firestorm?</p>

<p>The fate of the show in the wake of the controversy is currently a subject of speculation. While it's impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can draw some insights by looking at the example of The Ellen DeGeneres Show. It faced a similar situation with allegations of a toxic work environment, and it ultimately led to the show's conclusion after its 19th season. While the decision to end that show was made by the host and production team themselves, the ensuing controversy must have played a role in its demise.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


In the world of late-night television, The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon has long been celebrated for its humour and entertainment value. However, recent revelations from over a dozen current and former employees in a Rolling Stone exposé suggest a stark contrast between the cheerful on-screen persona of host Jimmy Fallon and the harsh reality of the show's behind-the-scenes dynamics.

In the world of late-night television, The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon has long been celebrated for its humour and entertainment value. However, recent revelations from over a dozen current and former employees in a Rolling Stone exposé suggest a stark contrast between the cheerful on-screen persona of host Jimmy Fallon and the harsh reality of the show's behind-the-scenes dynamics. Let's delve into the details of the reported toxic workplace environment at The Tonight Show, shedding light on its origins, effects, and calls for change. What is the whole shebang all about? We explain. Also Read | Jimmy Fallon apologises after allegations of difficult work environment: 'It’s embarrassing' Who is Jimmy Fallon? Born James Thomas Fallon on September 19, 1974, in Brooklyn, New York, he is one of the most beloved entertainers in the industry. His ascent to late-night television stardom began with his standout performances on Saturday Night Live (SNL) in 1998. His impressions and comedic talents made him a fan favorite. After SNL, he ventured into film and TV roles, eventually hosting Late Night with Jimmy Fallon in 2009. His tenure was marked by innovative segments and collaborations, solidifying his reputation as a versatile entertainer. In 2014, he took over as host of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon where his relatable and energetic style, along with viral digital content, has reshaped late-night TV. Snippets from a "bad Jimmy day" The atmosphere on the set of the show is usually characterised by warmth and congeniality, mirroring the host's amiable on-screen presence. However, as Rolling Stone reports, there are distinct "good Jimmy days" and "bad Jimmy days." One former employee recalls a particularly tense day in 2017 when Fallon's erratic behaviour during production meetings and rehearsal left many concerned about the show's future. Many reported witnessing Fallon's unpredictability, including snapping at crew members, berating colleagues, and expressing irritation over minor issues. The pervasive fear of his mood swings created a stifling atmosphere, where employees walked on eggshells. Toxic environment and its adverse impact According to the accounts of two current and 14 former staffers, this toxic work environment has been festering for years. This is said to have influenced the show's ever-changing leadership teams. Nine showrunners in nine years have struggled to manage the challenges posed by Fallon's management style. Seven former employees revealed that their mental health suffered while working on The Tonight Show. Dark jokes about self-harm were commonplace, and some would seek refuge in what they referred to as "crying rooms." These revelations underline the severe toll that the toxic work environment took on the show's staff. Rumours about Fallon's relationship with alcohol have circulated for years. While he has denied these allegations, multiple employees claimed to have witnessed him seemingly inebriated at work. Smells of alcohol on his breath were reported on several occasions, causing concern among staff. Employees expressed disillusionment with the Human Resources department as well, citing incidents where colleagues who approached HR were subsequently fired. HR was often seen as unhelpful, and many felt their concerns were not addressed effectively. Working on The Tonight Show often took a toll on mental health of staffers. Anxiety attacks, weight loss, hair thinning, and weakened nail beds were common among staff members. Multiple employees sought therapy, and some even experienced suicidal thoughts due to the hostile work environment, as per the Rolling Stone report. Employees recounted instances of Fallon's questionable conduct, including sending passive-aggressive feedback notes that felt like personal insults rather than constructive criticism. Witnesses also remembered an uncomfortable incident with comedian Jerry Seinfeld, where Fallon scolded a cue-card production member in the middle of a taping. Silent witnesses and fear of retaliation The fear of retaliation is palpable among those who spoke to Rolling Stone, many of whom requested anonymity. Their positions within the show varied, ranging from production crew members to office staffers and writers. Some left voluntarily due to their deteriorating mental health, while others claim they were fired. Their reluctance to speak out reflects the pervasive culture of fear that has taken root within the show. NBC's response In response, NBC where the show airs said in a statement, "We are incredibly proud of The Tonight Show, and providing a respectful working environment is a top priority. As in any workplace, we have had employees raise issues; those have been investigated and action has been taken where appropriate. As is always the case, we encourage employees who feel they have experienced or observed behaviour inconsistent with our policies to report their concerns so that we may address them accordingly.” Jimmy Fallon's apology In a subsequent Rolling Stone article, Fallon expressed his remorse during a Zoom call, admitting that he never intended to cultivate an uncomfortable atmosphere for his colleagues. He extended his apologies to his coworkers and their loved ones. Fallon conveyed his aspiration for The Tonight Show to be an enjoyable and all-encompassing programme, committed to making it the finest show possible. According to the employees mentioned by Rolling Stone, he conveyed, "It’s embarrassing and I feel so bad. Sorry if I embarrassed you and your family and friends… I feel so bad I can’t even tell you. I want the show to be fun, [it] should be inclusive to everybody. It should be the best show.” The Ellen way: Will The Tonight Show survive this firestorm? The fate of the show in the wake of the controversy is currently a subject of speculation. While it's impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can draw some insights by looking at the example of The Ellen DeGeneres Show. It faced a similar situation with allegations of a toxic work environment, and it ultimately led to the show's conclusion after its 19th season. While the decision to end that show was made by the host and production team themselves, the ensuing controversy must have played a role in its demise. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Explained | Toxic workplace, 'crying rooms' at Jimmy Fallon's The Tonight Show. How deep is the rot?

<p>The case involving Johnny Kitagawa and allegations of sexual abuse is a complex and disturbing series of events that have unfolded over the years. The initial claims date back to 1988 when Koji Kita, a former member of the Four Leaves, published diaries alleging that Kitagawa had made unwanted sexual advances towards young boys under his agency's contracts. These allegations were further supported by Junya Hiramoto, a former member of another band managed by Kitagawa, who claimed to have witnessed Kitagawa forcing a boy into a sexual encounter in one of the talent agency's dormitories.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/japan-boyband-agency-admits-founder-johnny-kitagawas-sexual-abuse-633384">Japan boyband agency admits founder Johnny Kitagawa's sexual abuse</a></strong></p>

<h2>When did allegations against Johnny Kitagawa first come to light?</h2>

<p>In 1999, the magazine Shukan Bunshun published a series of articles that detailed numerous allegations of sexual improprieties. These accusations came from a dozen teenage boys who had been recruited into Johnny &amp; Associates. The accusers chose to speak anonymously, fearing the consequences of coming forward. Additionally, the series accused Kitagawa of allowing minors in his employ to consume alcohol and tobacco, adding another layer to the scandal.</p>

<p>These allegations gained significant attention and led to a hearing in April 2000 conducted by Yoshihide Sakaue, a member of Parliament. While the National Police Agency acknowledged investigating Kitagawa's agency, they did not find sufficient evidence to confirm sexual harassment had occurred. Instead, they warned the agency about permitting minors to use alcohol and tobacco.</p>

<h2>Johnny Kitagawa denies any wrongdoing</h2>

<p>Throughout this period, Kitagawa vehemently denied any wrongdoing, and his attorney portrayed the claims as the grievances of disgruntled former employees. In response to the allegations, Kitagawa sued Shukan Bunshun for libel.</p>

<p>One notable aspect of this case was the lack of coverage by major Japanese media outlets. The New York Times attributed this absence of coverage to Kitagawa's significant influence over popular media in Japan. Johnny &amp; Associates also denied access to its performers to Shukan Bunshun and other media owned by its parent organisation.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/watch-radhika-madan-goes-gaming-with-wion-625418/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Legal battles and Johnny Kitagawa's death</h2>

<p>Years of legal battles ensued. In 2002, the Tokyo District Court awarded Kitagawa a judgement against Shukan Bunshun for defamation, though this decision was partially reversed by the Tokyo High Court in 2003. The Supreme Court ultimately rejected Kitagawa's appeal in 2004.</p>

<p>The case resurfaced after Johnny Kitagawa's death in July 2019, with new allegations emerging. Former Johnny's Jr. members made claims suggesting inappropriate relations between Kitagawa and young talents. In March 2023, a BBC documentary titled Predator: The Secret Scandal of J-Pop shed light on the sexual harassment allegations against Kitagawa, further bringing the issue to international attention.</p>

<p>In April 2023, singer Kauan Okamoto held a press conference alleging sexual abuse by Kitagawa and called on the company's management to acknowledge the misconduct. Johnny &amp; Associates released a statement in response, vowing to strengthen its governance and compliance measures.</p>

<h2>Johnny Kitagawa finally gets his comeuppance&nbsp;— after death</h2>

<p>The situation took a significant turn in August 2023 when an independent probe commissioned by Johnny &amp; Associates confirmed that Kitagawa had repeatedly committed sexual abuse from the early 1970s until the mid-2010s. Recommendations included the resignation of Julie Keiko Fujishima, the company's president and Kitagawa's niece, and making amends for the abuse.</p>

<p>Finally, on September 7, 2023, Johnny &amp; Associates formally acknowledged Kitagawa's abuse. Fujishima resigned from her post, and former Johnny's member Noriyuki Higashiyama assumed the role of CEO.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


The case involving Johnny Kitagawa and allegations of sexual abuse is a complex and disturbing series of events that have unfolded over the years. The initial claims date back to 1988 when Koji Kita, a former member of the Four Leaves, published diaries alleging that Kitagawa had made unwanted sexual advances towards young boys under his agency's contracts.

The case involving Johnny Kitagawa and allegations of sexual abuse is a complex and disturbing series of events that have unfolded over the years. The initial claims date back to 1988 when Koji Kita, a former member of the Four Leaves, published diaries alleging that Kitagawa had made unwanted sexual advances towards young boys under his agency's contracts. These allegations were further supported by Junya Hiramoto, a former member of another band managed by Kitagawa, who claimed to have witnessed Kitagawa forcing a boy into a sexual encounter in one of the talent agency's dormitories. Also Read | Japan boyband agency admits founder Johnny Kitagawa's sexual abuse When did allegations against Johnny Kitagawa first come to light? In 1999, the magazine Shukan Bunshun published a series of articles that detailed numerous allegations of sexual improprieties. These accusations came from a dozen teenage boys who had been recruited into Johnny & Associates. The accusers chose to speak anonymously, fearing the consequences of coming forward. Additionally, the series accused Kitagawa of allowing minors in his employ to consume alcohol and tobacco, adding another layer to the scandal. These allegations gained significant attention and led to a hearing in April 2000 conducted by Yoshihide Sakaue, a member of Parliament. While the National Police Agency acknowledged investigating Kitagawa's agency, they did not find sufficient evidence to confirm sexual harassment had occurred. Instead, they warned the agency about permitting minors to use alcohol and tobacco. Johnny Kitagawa denies any wrongdoing Throughout this period, Kitagawa vehemently denied any wrongdoing, and his attorney portrayed the claims as the grievances of disgruntled former employees. In response to the allegations, Kitagawa sued Shukan Bunshun for libel. One notable aspect of this case was the lack of coverage by major Japanese media outlets. The New York Times attributed this absence of coverage to Kitagawa's significant influence over popular media in Japan. Johnny & Associates also denied access to its performers to Shukan Bunshun and other media owned by its parent organisation. Legal battles and Johnny Kitagawa's death Years of legal battles ensued. In 2002, the Tokyo District Court awarded Kitagawa a judgement against Shukan Bunshun for defamation, though this decision was partially reversed by the Tokyo High Court in 2003. The Supreme Court ultimately rejected Kitagawa's appeal in 2004. The case resurfaced after Johnny Kitagawa's death in July 2019, with new allegations emerging. Former Johnny's Jr. members made claims suggesting inappropriate relations between Kitagawa and young talents. In March 2023, a BBC documentary titled Predator: The Secret Scandal of J-Pop shed light on the sexual harassment allegations against Kitagawa, further bringing the issue to international attention. In April 2023, singer Kauan Okamoto held a press conference alleging sexual abuse by Kitagawa and called on the company's management to acknowledge the misconduct. Johnny & Associates released a statement in response, vowing to strengthen its governance and compliance measures. Johnny Kitagawa finally gets his comeuppance — after death The situation took a significant turn in August 2023 when an independent probe commissioned by Johnny & Associates confirmed that Kitagawa had repeatedly committed sexual abuse from the early 1970s until the mid-2010s. Recommendations included the resignation of Julie Keiko Fujishima, the company's president and Kitagawa's niece, and making amends for the abuse. Finally, on September 7, 2023, Johnny & Associates formally acknowledged Kitagawa's abuse. Fujishima resigned from her post, and former Johnny's member Noriyuki Higashiyama assumed the role of CEO. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Johnny Kitagawa sexual abuse scandal: Everything to know

<p>My sincerest apologies for what may be an abundance of puns in this review.</p>

<p><em>The Nun II</em> arrives in theatres like a solemn procession, its dark, foreboding presence promising to send shivers down your spine. Yet, as the gates of fear swing wide open, it's hard not to feel a sense of déjà vu. This sequel to 2018's <em>The Nun</em> plunges us back into the sinister world of Valak, but rather than evolving, it feels like a visit to a familiar haunted house — eerie, but ultimately predictable. Directed by Michael Chaves this time and featuring a returning cast led by Taissa Farmiga, Jonas Bloquet, and Bonnie Aarons, this installment is steeped in the gothic supernatural horror that's become a hallmark of<em> The Conjuring</em> Universe.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But does it rise above its predecessor, or is it just another hymn in the same old sinister songbook? Let's dive deeper.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/top-10-greatest-horror-movies-of-all-time-529631">Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time</a></strong></p>

<h2>What is <em>The Nun II</em> about?</h2>

<p>The film picks up four years after the events of its predecessor, with Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) once again battling the titular Nun's unholy shenanigans at a boarding school in France. The premise certainly had potential, and promised to explore&nbsp;the backstory of Valak and the mysteries surrounding the cursed abbey. However, any hope for something truly substantial&nbsp;is quickly quashed as the film&nbsp;traverses a well-trodden path of horror tropes.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/is-priyanka-chopras-citadel-worth-the-hype-critically-speaking-587036/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Jump scares galore</h2>

<p>Jump scares, a staple of modern horror cinema, are in abundant supply here, and it's clear that they were meticulously scheduled into the script. Jump scares, as a rule of thumb, do not make for an immersive horror experience. Here,&nbsp;they lack even the element of surprise that can make them terrifying. Instead, they arrive predictably, much like the chiming of a church bell, robbing the film of any genuine suspense.</p>

<p>The atmosphere, at least initially, manages to create an aura of dread. The school's eerie corridors and dimly lit chambers terrify with a hint of the unknown lurking around every corner.&nbsp;The visuals do&nbsp;provide an unsettling backdrop for the unfolding horrors. The use of light, or its clever absence, is also good. Technically, it has all the makings of a well-made horror movie.</p>

<p>Yet, as the film progresses, Valak's antics and the film's various attempts to craft scares begin to feel less menacing and more like a rehearsed routine. The sense of foreboding gradually dissipates as the film gets increasingly, er, nun-scary.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-talk-to-me-review-a-psychological-horror-film-that-will-chill-you-to-the-bone-622402">Talk to Me review: A psychological horror film that will chill you to the bone</a></strong></p>

<h2>The ending falls flat</h2>

<p>Despite what I said above, the story has a certain depth that was missing in the original film. However, the film's ending, arguably its most crucial moment, is a rushed affair that leaves much to be desired. It's as though the director was hurrying to finish his confession before the church bells rang. The revelations and confrontations lack the emotional weight and depth needed to make them truly impactful, resulting in a hastily put together denouement.</p>

<h2>The acting is good, but little else</h2>

<p>On the acting front, the cast delivers commendable performances. Farmiga, in particular, brings a sense of determination and vulnerability to Sister Irene that resonates. (Also, in a few shots she looks like a spitting image of her mother, Vera Farmiga, who essays&nbsp;Lorraine Warren in The Conjuring movies.)</p>

<p>However, the actors' efforts are hindered by a script that fails to provide them with the material needed to shine. The cast's efforts can't save a story that feels like it's been exhumed from the cinematic graveyard of horror clichés.</p>

<p><em>The Nun II</em> ultimately feels like a confessional gone wrong. It's a missed opportunity in a genre that could use some fresh, original voices.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


My sincerest apologies for what may be an abundance of puns in this review. The Nun II arrives in theatres like a solemn procession, its dark, foreboding presence promising to send shivers down your spine.

My sincerest apologies for what may be an abundance of puns in this review. The Nun II arrives in theatres like a solemn procession, its dark, foreboding presence promising to send shivers down your spine. Yet, as the gates of fear swing wide open, it's hard not to feel a sense of déjà vu. This sequel to 2018's The Nun plunges us back into the sinister world of Valak, but rather than evolving, it feels like a visit to a familiar haunted house — eerie, but ultimately predictable. Directed by Michael Chaves this time and featuring a returning cast led by Taissa Farmiga, Jonas Bloquet, and Bonnie Aarons, this installment is steeped in the gothic supernatural horror that's become a hallmark of The Conjuring Universe. But does it rise above its predecessor, or is it just another hymn in the same old sinister songbook? Let's dive deeper. Also Read | Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time What is The Nun II about? The film picks up four years after the events of its predecessor, with Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) once again battling the titular Nun's unholy shenanigans at a boarding school in France. The premise certainly had potential, and promised to explore the backstory of Valak and the mysteries surrounding the cursed abbey. However, any hope for something truly substantial is quickly quashed as the film traverses a well-trodden path of horror tropes. Jump scares galore Jump scares, a staple of modern horror cinema, are in abundant supply here, and it's clear that they were meticulously scheduled into the script. Jump scares, as a rule of thumb, do not make for an immersive horror experience. Here, they lack even the element of surprise that can make them terrifying. Instead, they arrive predictably, much like the chiming of a church bell, robbing the film of any genuine suspense. The atmosphere, at least initially, manages to create an aura of dread. The school's eerie corridors and dimly lit chambers terrify with a hint of the unknown lurking around every corner. The visuals do provide an unsettling backdrop for the unfolding horrors. The use of light, or its clever absence, is also good. Technically, it has all the makings of a well-made horror movie. Yet, as the film progresses, Valak's antics and the film's various attempts to craft scares begin to feel less menacing and more like a rehearsed routine. The sense of foreboding gradually dissipates as the film gets increasingly, er, nun-scary. Also Read | Talk to Me review: A psychological horror film that will chill you to the bone The ending falls flat Despite what I said above, the story has a certain depth that was missing in the original film. However, the film's ending, arguably its most crucial moment, is a rushed affair that leaves much to be desired. It's as though the director was hurrying to finish his confession before the church bells rang. The revelations and confrontations lack the emotional weight and depth needed to make them truly impactful, resulting in a hastily put together denouement. The acting is good, but little else On the acting front, the cast delivers commendable performances. Farmiga, in particular, brings a sense of determination and vulnerability to Sister Irene that resonates. (Also, in a few shots she looks like a spitting image of her mother, Vera Farmiga, who essays Lorraine Warren in The Conjuring movies.) However, the actors' efforts are hindered by a script that fails to provide them with the material needed to shine. The cast's efforts can't save a story that feels like it's been exhumed from the cinematic graveyard of horror clichés. The Nun II ultimately feels like a confessional gone wrong. It's a missed opportunity in a genre that could use some fresh, original voices. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

The Nun II review: A familiar haunting

<p>No other author has had as enduring an impact on the mystery genre as Agatha Christie, who is frequently celebrated as the ‘Queen of Mystery’. Her extensive body of work, with estimated sales ranging from 2 to 4 billion copies, firmly establishes her among the most widely read authors, a distinction she shares with William Shakespeare. Her stories have also been a wellspring of inspiration for the world of entertainment for decades. From the silver screen to the theater stage, Agatha Christie's whodunits and crime fiction novels have been brought to life in countless adaptations.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Also Read</strong> |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-watch--a-haunting-in-venice-trailer-kenneth-branaghs-hercule-poirot-in-a-supernatural-mystery-617885">WATCH: A Haunting in Venice trailer: Kenneth Branagh's Hercule Poirot in a supernatural mystery</a></strong></p>

<p>The upcoming supernatural mystery film<em> A Haunting in Venice,</em> co-produced and directed by Kenneth Branagh, is another addition to the legacy of Christie. It derives its inspiration from Agatha Christie's 1969 novel, “Hallowe'en Party”. The film, penned by screenwriter Michael Green, serves as a follow-up to the 2022 film <em>Death on the Nile</em> and marks Branagh's third portrayal of the Belgian detective Hercule Poirot.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Before the movie comes out, though, let's explore Christie's adaptations in India. While her British and American adaptations are widely recognised, her Indian adaptations (mostly uncredited) have garnered comparatively less attention.&nbsp;</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yEddsSwweyE?si=Ob5DYaUL7rzOK3tn" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><em>Chupi Chupi Aashey</em> (1960)</h2>

<p>One notable early example is the 1960 Bengali murder mystery film,<em> Chupi Chupi Aashey</em>, which took its cues from Christie's stage play <em>The Mousetrap</em>. In this adaptation, the murder of a woman in a hotel sets the stage for a gripping mystery as guests with false identities become stranded due to sudden floods.</p>

<h2><em>Gumnaam</em> (1965)</h2>

<p>Following suit, Gumnaam in 1965 became the first Hindi film to draw from Christie's <em>And Then There Were None</em>, albeit without acknowledging its source. Starring acclaimed actors like Manoj Kumar, Nanda, Pran, Helen, and Mehmood, the adaptation featured seven guests instead of the original ten and introduced song and dance routines to cater to Indian audiences.</p>

<h2><strong><em>Nadu Iravil </em>(1970)</strong></h2>

<p><em>Nadu Iravil</em> continued this trend with an adaptation of <em>And Then There Were None</em>, opting for a big house setting. However, for those familiar with Christie's original story, the film failed to make a remarkable impact.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/100-years-on-agatha-christie-still-as-popular-332971/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong><em>Dhund </em>(1973)</strong></h2>

<p><em>Dhund</em>, directed by BR Chopra, emerged as a standout Indian adaptation, drawing inspiration from Christie's 1958 play <em>The Unexpected Guest</em>. With a star-studded cast that included Sanjay Khan, Zeenat Aman, Danny Denzongpa, and others, the film revolved around a man's discovery of a dead husband and a woman claiming to have killed him in self-defence, leading to a tense and thrilling narrative.</p>

<h2><em>Shubho Mahurat (2003)</em></h2>

<p>The renowned Bengali filmmaker Rituparno Ghosh brought Christie to Indian screens with <em>Shubho Mahurat,</em> based on <em>The Mirror Crack'd from Side to Side</em>. This adaptation, featuring Sharmila Tagore, Nandita Das, and Rakhi, expertly captured the essence of the original work in a lovingly shot and acted film.</p>

<h2><em>Aduthathu </em>(2011) and <em>Aatagaram </em>(2015)</h2>

<p>In the Tamil and Kannada film industries, Aduthathu and Aatagaram respectively, both adapted <em>And Then There Were None</em>. These films underscored the enduring appeal of Christie's narratives, with <em>Aatagaram</em> even sparking debates over alleged plot similarities.</p>

<h2><em>Grandmaster </em>(2012)</h2>

<p>Mohanlal starred in the 012 Malayalam film, a loose adaptation of Christie's <em>The A.B.C. Murders. </em>The film retained the alphabetical order killings but shifted focus towards Mohanlal's star power, occasionally sidelining the mystery-solving aspect.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Kh9ieUeCSAQ?si=PbTZ7qyEE6VNkW42" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><em>Charlie Chopra &amp; The Mystery Of Solang Valley</em> (2023)</h2>

<p>The latest Christie adaptation the Indian audiences have been treated to is <em>Charlie Chopra &amp; The Mystery Of Solang Valley, </em>which is not, in fact, a movie. It is a Hindi-language mystery thriller TV series available on SonyLIV. Directed by Vishal Bhardwaj, the series adapted Christie's <em>The Sittaford Mystery</em> for the Indian context. Boasting a stellar ensemble cast, including Wamiqa Gabbi, Priyanshu Painyuli, Naseeruddin Shah, and others, the show's pilot episode premiered in June, with subsequent episodes slated for release starting on September 27.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


No other author has had as enduring an impact on the mystery genre as Agatha Christie, who is frequently celebrated as the ‘Queen of Mystery’. Her extensive body of work, with estimated sales ranging from 2 to 4 billion copies, firmly establishes her among the most widely read authors, a distinction she shares with William Shakespeare.

No other author has had as enduring an impact on the mystery genre as Agatha Christie, who is frequently celebrated as the ‘Queen of Mystery’. Her extensive body of work, with estimated sales ranging from 2 to 4 billion copies, firmly establishes her among the most widely read authors, a distinction she shares with William Shakespeare. Her stories have also been a wellspring of inspiration for the world of entertainment for decades. From the silver screen to the theater stage, Agatha Christie's whodunits and crime fiction novels have been brought to life in countless adaptations. Also Read | WATCH: A Haunting in Venice trailer: Kenneth Branagh's Hercule Poirot in a supernatural mystery The upcoming supernatural mystery film A Haunting in Venice, co-produced and directed by Kenneth Branagh, is another addition to the legacy of Christie. It derives its inspiration from Agatha Christie's 1969 novel, “Hallowe'en Party”. The film, penned by screenwriter Michael Green, serves as a follow-up to the 2022 film Death on the Nile and marks Branagh's third portrayal of the Belgian detective Hercule Poirot. Before the movie comes out, though, let's explore Christie's adaptations in India. While her British and American adaptations are widely recognised, her Indian adaptations (mostly uncredited) have garnered comparatively less attention. Chupi Chupi Aashey (1960) One notable early example is the 1960 Bengali murder mystery film, Chupi Chupi Aashey, which took its cues from Christie's stage play The Mousetrap. In this adaptation, the murder of a woman in a hotel sets the stage for a gripping mystery as guests with false identities become stranded due to sudden floods. Gumnaam (1965) Following suit, Gumnaam in 1965 became the first Hindi film to draw from Christie's And Then There Were None, albeit without acknowledging its source. Starring acclaimed actors like Manoj Kumar, Nanda, Pran, Helen, and Mehmood, the adaptation featured seven guests instead of the original ten and introduced song and dance routines to cater to Indian audiences. Nadu Iravil (1970) Nadu Iravil continued this trend with an adaptation of And Then There Were None, opting for a big house setting. However, for those familiar with Christie's original story, the film failed to make a remarkable impact. Dhund (1973) Dhund, directed by BR Chopra, emerged as a standout Indian adaptation, drawing inspiration from Christie's 1958 play The Unexpected Guest. With a star-studded cast that included Sanjay Khan, Zeenat Aman, Danny Denzongpa, and others, the film revolved around a man's discovery of a dead husband and a woman claiming to have killed him in self-defence, leading to a tense and thrilling narrative. Shubho Mahurat (2003) The renowned Bengali filmmaker Rituparno Ghosh brought Christie to Indian screens with Shubho Mahurat, based on The Mirror Crack'd from Side to Side. This adaptation, featuring Sharmila Tagore, Nandita Das, and Rakhi, expertly captured the essence of the original work in a lovingly shot and acted film. Aduthathu (2011) and Aatagaram (2015) In the Tamil and Kannada film industries, Aduthathu and Aatagaram respectively, both adapted And Then There Were None. These films underscored the enduring appeal of Christie's narratives, with Aatagaram even sparking debates over alleged plot similarities. Grandmaster (2012) Mohanlal starred in the 012 Malayalam film, a loose adaptation of Christie's The A.B.C. Murders. The film retained the alphabetical order killings but shifted focus towards Mohanlal's star power, occasionally sidelining the mystery-solving aspect. Charlie Chopra & The Mystery Of Solang Valley (2023) The latest Christie adaptation the Indian audiences have been treated to is Charlie Chopra & The Mystery Of Solang Valley, which is not, in fact, a movie. It is a Hindi-language mystery thriller TV series available on SonyLIV. Directed by Vishal Bhardwaj, the series adapted Christie's The Sittaford Mystery for the Indian context. Boasting a stellar ensemble cast, including Wamiqa Gabbi, Priyanshu Painyuli, Naseeruddin Shah, and others, the show's pilot episode premiered in June, with subsequent episodes slated for release starting on September 27. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Indian cinema's hidden affair with Agatha Christie: From Gumnaam to Charlie Chopra

<p>Mammootty, the veteran actor of unmatched acclaim who is best known for his work in Malayalam cinema, turns 72 today. This is a milestone in a career that has been a canvas for myriad characters. On this special occasion, it is only fitting to shed light on one of his most remarkable performances, one that transcends the realms of ordinary acting and enters the realm of artistry — his portrayal of Bhaskara Patelar in the cinematic gem, Vidheyan. While Mammootty has given numerous great performances, his portrayal in this Adoor Gopalakrishnan directorial lingers in the recesses of our minds like a haunting melody.</p>

<h2>Mammootty becomes Bhaskara Patelar in Vidheyan</h2>

<p>In Vidheyan, Mammootty's portrayal of Bhaskara Patelar is a tour de force of the human condition. It is a character study that unfurls with raw intensity, offering a glimpse into the enigmatic world of power, oppression, and the profound transformation of a man torn between his tyrannical persona and his inner demons.&nbsp;</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xKRI7TMroXs?si=e2Ynuwvjb9Jv8gOM" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>What makes this performance truly exceptional is its restraint. It doesn't rely on grand theatrics or melodrama. Much like the film's arid landscape, Mammootty's performance is devoid of ostentation; instead, it thrives on the subtlety of his expressions and the depth of his character's evolution. It quietly seeps into your consciousness, leaving a lasting impact. The nuances in his portrayal reveal the depths of his understanding of the character and the story's thematic layers.</p>

<p>As Bhaskara Patelar, Mammootty's eyes, windows to the soul, narrate a story of their own. They portray a spectrum of emotions, from the malevolence that marks his oppressive rule to the vulnerability that lurks beneath the facade. It is through these eyes that Mammootty artfully dissects the complexity of his character, making us not only despise but also empathise with this deeply flawed figure.</p>

<p>One instance from the film that encapsulates Mammootty's brilliance is a scene where Patelar confronts his own demons. In a moment of quiet introspection, he peels away the layers of his brutality, revealing a man haunted by his own choices. It is a scene devoid of grandiloquence, yet is nothing short of extraordinary.&nbsp;</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/disney-explores-ai-applications-across-entertainment-conglomerate-623631/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Vidheyan&nbsp;— more than a film?</h2>

<p>Vidheyan isn't merely a film; it is a profound exploration of the human condition, brought to life by Mammootty's unparalleled talent. His portrayal of Bhaskara Patelar is a masterclass in restrained yet impactful acting, an illustration of the actor's dedication to his craft. As Mammootty celebrates his 72nd birthday, we not only applaud his enduring presence in cinema but also honour his legacy as a performer who, through roles like Bhaskara Patelar, continues to provoke thought, stir emotions, and challenge our perceptions of good and evil. His Vidheyan performance is a timeless ode to the brilliance that defines his illustrious career.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Mammootty, the veteran actor of unmatched acclaim who is best known for his work in Malayalam cinema, turns 72 today. This is a milestone in a career that has been a canvas for myriad characters.

Mammootty, the veteran actor of unmatched acclaim who is best known for his work in Malayalam cinema, turns 72 today. This is a milestone in a career that has been a canvas for myriad characters. On this special occasion, it is only fitting to shed light on one of his most remarkable performances, one that transcends the realms of ordinary acting and enters the realm of artistry — his portrayal of Bhaskara Patelar in the cinematic gem, Vidheyan. While Mammootty has given numerous great performances, his portrayal in this Adoor Gopalakrishnan directorial lingers in the recesses of our minds like a haunting melody. Mammootty becomes Bhaskara Patelar in Vidheyan In Vidheyan, Mammootty's portrayal of Bhaskara Patelar is a tour de force of the human condition. It is a character study that unfurls with raw intensity, offering a glimpse into the enigmatic world of power, oppression, and the profound transformation of a man torn between his tyrannical persona and his inner demons. What makes this performance truly exceptional is its restraint. It doesn't rely on grand theatrics or melodrama. Much like the film's arid landscape, Mammootty's performance is devoid of ostentation; instead, it thrives on the subtlety of his expressions and the depth of his character's evolution. It quietly seeps into your consciousness, leaving a lasting impact. The nuances in his portrayal reveal the depths of his understanding of the character and the story's thematic layers. As Bhaskara Patelar, Mammootty's eyes, windows to the soul, narrate a story of their own. They portray a spectrum of emotions, from the malevolence that marks his oppressive rule to the vulnerability that lurks beneath the facade. It is through these eyes that Mammootty artfully dissects the complexity of his character, making us not only despise but also empathise with this deeply flawed figure. One instance from the film that encapsulates Mammootty's brilliance is a scene where Patelar confronts his own demons. In a moment of quiet introspection, he peels away the layers of his brutality, revealing a man haunted by his own choices. It is a scene devoid of grandiloquence, yet is nothing short of extraordinary. Vidheyan — more than a film? Vidheyan isn't merely a film; it is a profound exploration of the human condition, brought to life by Mammootty's unparalleled talent. His portrayal of Bhaskara Patelar is a masterclass in restrained yet impactful acting, an illustration of the actor's dedication to his craft. As Mammootty celebrates his 72nd birthday, we not only applaud his enduring presence in cinema but also honour his legacy as a performer who, through roles like Bhaskara Patelar, continues to provoke thought, stir emotions, and challenge our perceptions of good and evil. His Vidheyan performance is a timeless ode to the brilliance that defines his illustrious career. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Mammootty at 72: Reflecting on his timeless, brilliant performance in Vidheyan

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Kshitij Mohan Rawat

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.