How fast can the Sukhoi Su-30 fighter jet really fly?

Did China ask its people 'not to respond to aliens'? Origin of bizarre claim on social media

MS Dhoni-CSK Fallout? Report claims failed stake sale talks triggered rift

Scientists reveal the SAFEST COUNTRY when catastrophe strikes the planet

Serial killer on the loose in South Korea's Jeju Island? Fourth body found in three days as more than a dozen people go missing

2/3rd of glacier detached, collapsed: ISRO satellite images reveal what triggered Nepal floods

Trump once again claims without him there would be ‘no Israel right now’

Foreign espionage attacks against German companies surge to 37%, Bitkom report reveals

Blake Lively wins partial legal fee from Justin Baldoni after $8M request

Why is Pakistan deploying Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones near India border?

'OH MY GOD! We've found other agents!': Investigators discover not one or two, almost 700 OpenAI AI agents went rogue, hacked Hugging Face

Lunar eclipse 2026: India timings, places to see and more. August Blood moon factsheet

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat on global outreach tour 

Both pilots killed as training aircraft crashes in Lucknow – What we know

16-year-old charged with preparing terror attack on kindergarten in Norway

How the S-400 protects itself from enemy attacks

Nepal floods: Over 165 dead, 400 missing; US, India, China, World Bank mobilise aid

India's multi-layered watch: The new surveillance war

5 doomsday planes spotted in US skies hours after CIA director's secret trip to Russia

9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to finally face trial in 2028, nearly 27 years after horrific attacks

Islamabad hospital fire: What we know about one of the biggest facility that housed Imran Khan

Workers run for life while filming Nepal flash flood: Scary new visuals emerge from Rasuwa

Russian military planes enter South Korean air defence zone amid rising tensions with North Korea: What's happening

Ron Weasley Is Back! Rupert Grint set to return to Harry Potter universe on Broadway

400-year-old 'vampire' grave in Poland reveals non-existent genetic lineage

Dolly Parton, global icon and queen of country music, dies at 80

Nepal flash floods: Kailash Mansarovar yatra affected, close to 400 pilgrims out of contact

'If he is dead, they're putting on a pretty good show': Trump casts fresh doubt over Mojtaba Khamenei's fate

Man arrested near US Capitol with guillotine in pickup truck: What happened?

Why the Su-30MKI cockpit is painted bright turquoise green

Iran has warned that the United States has expanded the list of legitimate targets by striking Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend and accused US President Donald Trump of inflaming tensions by backing Israel’s military campaign. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” said Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya military command, in a video statement delivered in English on Monday.Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-18-hour-flight-mid-air-refuellings-how-us-fooled-iran-with-decoy-b-2-bombers-and-hit-three-nuclear-facilities-1750682313639">'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities</a><h2>Trump calls airstrike a ‘Bullseye’, hints at regime change</h2>President Trump praised the strikes on social media, calling them a “Bullseye!!!” and claiming that “monumental damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran,” especially “far below ground level.”Although the White House has stated the goal is only to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Trump appeared to go further on Sunday, suggesting that regime change might be a natural consequence.“It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!” he posted.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-iran-s-secret-cyber-war-how-tehran-tel-aviv-are-waging-war-online-and-why-us-is-in-the-crossfire-1750610574082">Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?</a><h2>Nuclear facility may be destroyed, says satellite analysis</h2>Commercial satellite images analysed by experts suggest that the US strikes caused serious damage to Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility, which is built deep within a mountain. The site may have been destroyed along with the centrifuges used to enrich uranium, although this has yet to be independently confirmed.Fordow was one of three key targets struck by US bunker-busting bombs in what has become the largest coordinated strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure to date.Iran claims that over 400 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Israeli attacks. In response, Iran launched missile strikes that killed 24 Israeli civilians and injured hundreds more, marking the first time Iranian missiles have pierced Israeli defences in such large numbers.<h2>Strait of Hormuz under threat as oil prices fluctuate</h2>Iran’s parliament has approved a proposal to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital channel through which 20% of the world’s oil flows, although final approval lies with the Supreme National Security Council. Any attempt to close the strait could trigger a global oil crisis and a direct military clash with the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which is based in nearby Bahrain.Oil prices spiked briefly on Monday, hitting their highest point since January, before settling. Brent crude futures fell 0.5% to $76.64 a barrel by 8:30 am GMT, after climbing above $80 at market open.US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned, “It’s economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that.”

Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats.

Iran has warned that the United States has expanded the list of legitimate targets by striking Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend and accused US President Donald Trump of inflaming tensions by backing Israel’s military campaign. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” said Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya military command, in a video statement delivered in English on Monday. Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats. Also read: '18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities Trump calls airstrike a ‘Bullseye’, hints at regime change President Trump praised the strikes on social media, calling them a “Bullseye!!!” and claiming that “monumental damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran,” especially “far below ground level.” Although the White House has stated the goal is only to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Trump appeared to go further on Sunday, suggesting that regime change might be a natural consequence. “It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!” he posted. Also read: Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire? Nuclear facility may be destroyed, says satellite analysis Commercial satellite images analysed by experts suggest that the US strikes caused serious damage to Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility, which is built deep within a mountain. The site may have been destroyed along with the centrifuges used to enrich uranium, although this has yet to be independently confirmed. Fordow was one of three key targets struck by US bunker-busting bombs in what has become the largest coordinated strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure to date. Iran claims that over 400 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Israeli attacks. In response, Iran launched missile strikes that killed 24 Israeli civilians and injured hundreds more, marking the first time Iranian missiles have pierced Israeli defences in such large numbers. Strait of Hormuz under threat as oil prices fluctuate Iran’s parliament has approved a proposal to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital channel through which 20% of the world’s oil flows, although final approval lies with the Supreme National Security Council. Any attempt to close the strait could trigger a global oil crisis and a direct military clash with the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which is based in nearby Bahrain. Oil prices spiked briefly on Monday, hitting their highest point since January, before settling. Brent crude futures fell 0.5% to $76.64 a barrel by 8:30 am GMT, after climbing above $80 at market open. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned, “It’s economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that.”

Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats.

'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after Trump’s ‘bullseye’ strike on nuclear sites; says 'we will end' this war

Amid fears of Iran closing down the Strait of Hormuz and severely impacting oil supplies, US President Donald Trump issued a warning to global oil producers and urged them to resist any move that could increase costs. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important oil routes in the world, and about one-fifth of the global oil supply passes through it daily. “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING! YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday morning in all caps and using exclamation marks, as he mostly does.&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;Trump also issued an appeal to increase America’s domestic oil and gas supply, “To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!”&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;The Iranian lawmakers had threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key commercial shipping channel for the world’s oil supply, in retaliation for the US strikes.&nbsp;&nbsp;Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers that may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.It would also negatively impact his efforts to boost the US economy by increasing business costs that would in turn deter investment and job growth.&nbsp;&nbsp;So far, oil prices have been subdued after jumping 4 per cent after trading began on Sunday night but pared back soon.On Monday morning, the price of a barrel of US oil was marginally up by 0.4 per cent at $74.16 after briefly dipping, while Brent crude, the international standard, edged up by 0.2 per cent to $77.17 per barrel. Both are still higher than before strikes began on Iran over a week ago.&nbsp;The subdued market reaction shows investors believe Iran is unlikely to block the Strait of Hormuz, as it is itself a major oil producer and would suffer from a closure. Analysts also suspect if Iran would close the waterway, since it itself uses it to move its own crude, mostly to China, and needs the revenue.&nbsp;US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday that any attempt by Iran to block the strait would be “economic suicide” and would draw a response from Washington.

Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers, which may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.

Amid fears of Iran closing down the Strait of Hormuz and severely impacting oil supplies, US President Donald Trump issued a warning to global oil producers and urged them to resist any move that could increase costs. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important oil routes in the world, and about one-fifth of the global oil supply passes through it daily. “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING! YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday morning in all caps and using exclamation marks, as he mostly does.

Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers, which may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.

‘Keep oil prices down. I’m watching’: Trump issues warning after Iran strikes

US President Donald Trump has said he is still open to diplomacy with Iran but questioned why the Iranian people shouldn’t remove their government if it refuses to negotiate. His comments came after American B-2 bombers struck three of Iran’s key nuclear sites over the weekend.Speaking on Fox News, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn’t the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-18-hour-flight-mid-air-refuellings-how-us-fooled-iran-with-decoy-b-2-bombers-and-hit-three-nuclear-facilities-1750682313639">'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities</a><h2>Trump contradicts officials with ‘regime change’ post</h2>Although senior US officials have consistently said that regime change is not the aim of American policy, Trump posted on social media Sunday, “Why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???”The strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities marked a major escalation in US involvement in the conflict, with Washington now backing Israel’s campaign to shut down Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-iran-s-secret-cyber-war-how-tehran-tel-aviv-are-waging-war-online-and-why-us-is-in-the-crossfire-1750610574082">Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?</a><h2>White House confident Iran’s nuclear sites are destroyed</h2>Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night.”She added, “We have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran’s enriched uranium was stored.” Leavitt insisted the president would not have approved the strikes unless he believed they would be effective.<h2>IAEA chief says Iran’s uranium stockpile unaccounted for</h2>Rafael Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the agency cannot confirm where Iran’s near-weapons-grade nuclear material is currently located. He has called for inspectors to be allowed back into Iran to examine the impact of the strikes and assess the situation on the ground. Speaking to CNN, Grossi noted that Iran has roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, close to the 90% required to make a nuclear bomb.General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Monday it was still “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been entirely eliminated. He said assessments were ongoing and that further analysis would be needed in the&nbsp;coming&nbsp;days.

Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated.”

US President Donald Trump has said he is still open to diplomacy with Iran but questioned why the Iranian people shouldn’t remove their government if it refuses to negotiate. His comments came after American B-2 bombers struck three of Iran’s key nuclear sites over the weekend. Speaking on Fox News, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn’t the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?” Also read: '18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities Trump contradicts officials with ‘regime change’ post Although senior US officials have consistently said that regime change is not the aim of American policy, Trump posted on social media Sunday, “Why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???” The strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities marked a major escalation in US involvement in the conflict, with Washington now backing Israel’s campaign to shut down Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Also read: Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire? White House confident Iran’s nuclear sites are destroyed Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night.” She added, “We have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran’s enriched uranium was stored.” Leavitt insisted the president would not have approved the strikes unless he believed they would be effective. IAEA chief says Iran’s uranium stockpile unaccounted for Rafael Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the agency cannot confirm where Iran’s near-weapons-grade nuclear material is currently located. He has called for inspectors to be allowed back into Iran to examine the impact of the strikes and assess the situation on the ground. Speaking to CNN, Grossi noted that Iran has roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, close to the 90% required to make a nuclear bomb. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Monday it was still “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been entirely eliminated. He said assessments were ongoing and that further analysis would be needed in the coming days.

Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated.”

'Take away power of this regime': Trump 'still interested' in Iran diplomacy but asks why Iranians don’t overthrow 'violent' regime

After the Iranian armed forces on Sunday (June 22) carried out another wave of massive missile-drone attacks on Israeli military targets that include Ben Gurion Airport and biological research centres, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) deployed the Kheibar Shekan, Iran's latest long-range solid-fuel ballistic missile.&nbsp;The IRGC also confirmed the use of the Kheibar Shekan missile in the attack calling it a broader “strategic response to Israeli aggression."&nbsp;The Kheibar Shekan missile and its capabilities&nbsp;<ul><li>The Kheibar Shekan is Iran's latest long-range solid-fuel ballistic missile that derives its name its name from Arabic, meaning "Breaker of Khyber", a reference to the historical battle of Khyber between Muslims and Jews in Arabia.</li><li>The missile belongs to the fourth generation of the Khorramshahr family of ballistic missiles, according to IRGC, reported euro news.</li><li>Considered as a vital technical development in the Iranian missile system, Kheibar Shekan has a range of 1,450 kilometres.</li><li>The missile is equipped with a satellite guidance system, giving it a higher degree of accuracy.</li><li>The missile is four metres long and weighs about 1,500 kilograms.</li><li>While the speed of the missile is more than 19,500 km/h outside the atmosphere and nearly 9,800 km/h inside it. This makes it difficult for even the advanced defence systems to intercept it.</li></ul>Missile's development&nbsp;The first version of the missile came in 2017, as Tehran unveiled the Khorramshahr-1. The missile which was 13 metres long and 1.5 metres in diameter was unveiled at a military parade on the occasion of "Holy Defence Week".&nbsp;While the second version of the missile came almost two years later in 2019 followed by the fourth generation "Khorramshahr-4" in May 2023.&nbsp;However, the third generation "Khorramshahr-3" was not been revealed by Iran but military sources confirmed that it exists and has advanced capabilities, reported euronews.&nbsp;Notably Kheibar Shekan belongs to the fourth generation of the Khorramshahr family of ballistic missiles. &nbsp;

The Kheibar Shekan is Irans latest long-range solid fuel ballistic missile that derives its name its name from Arabic, meaning Breaker of Khyber.

After the Iranian armed forces on Sunday (June 22) carried out another wave of massive missile-drone attacks on Israeli military targets that include Ben Gurion Airport and biological research centres, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) deployed the Kheibar Shekan, Iran's latest long-range solid-fuel ballistic missile. The IRGC also confirmed the use of the Kheibar Shekan missile in the attack calling it a broader “strategic response to Israeli aggression." The Kheibar Shekan missile and its capabilities The Kheibar Shekan is Iran's latest long-range solid-fuel ballistic missile that derives its name its name from Arabic, meaning "Breaker of Khyber", a reference to the historical battle of Khyber between Muslims and Jews in Arabia. The missile belongs to the fourth generation of the Khorramshahr family of ballistic missiles, according to IRGC, reported euro news. Considered as a vital technical development in the Iranian missile system, Kheibar Shekan has a range of 1,450 kilometres. The missile is equipped with a satellite guidance system, giving it a higher degree of accuracy. The missile is four metres long and weighs about 1,500 kilograms. While the speed of the missile is more than 19,500 km/h outside the atmosphere and nearly 9,800 km/h inside it. This makes it difficult for even the advanced defence systems to intercept it. Missile's development The first version of the missile came in 2017, as Tehran unveiled the Khorramshahr-1. The missile which was 13 metres long and 1.5 metres in diameter was unveiled at a military parade on the occasion of "Holy Defence Week". While the second version of the missile came almost two years later in 2019 followed by the fourth generation "Khorramshahr-4" in May 2023. However, the third generation "Khorramshahr-3" was not been revealed by Iran but military sources confirmed that it exists and has advanced capabilities, reported euronews. Notably Kheibar Shekan belongs to the fourth generation of the Khorramshahr family of ballistic missiles.

The Kheibar Shekan is Iran's latest long-range solid-fuel ballistic missile that derives its name its name from Arabic, meaning "Breaker of Khyber".

What is Iran's 'invisible' Kheibar Shekan missile that pierced Israel's Iron Dome?

An 18-hour flight each way, multiple mid-air refuellings, and clever diversions, this is what the US did to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. The mission, known as Operation Midnight Hammer, relied on misdirection and stealth to ensure maximum impact with minimum detection.<h2>A false trail: B-2s seen heading towards the Pacific</h2>On Saturday, a formation of B-2 stealth bombers took off from their base in Missouri. Observers spotted them flying toward Guam, a US territory in the Pacific. It appeared the US was signalling a strike was coming, just not immediately. But this flight was a decoy, meant to draw attention away from the real mission.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-iran-s-secret-cyber-war-how-tehran-tel-aviv-are-waging-war-online-and-why-us-is-in-the-crossfire-1750610574082">Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?</a>While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected. US fighter jets also played a role in the deception, flying ahead of the stealth bombers to draw out enemy defences.As the bombers approached Iranian airspace, a US submarine fired over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles to disable critical air defences. Within minutes, the B-2s dropped 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 30,000 pounds, on Iran’s key nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-s-fordow-still-not-completely-obliterated-after-being-hit-by-us-bunker-busters-here-s-what-israeli-and-us-intelligence-reveal-1750613456192">Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal</a><h2>Largest-ever B-2 mission went undetected</h2>The operation marked the largest-ever coordinated B-2 strike and the second-longest B-2 flight in history, second only to post-9/11 missions. The Pentagon confirmed that more than 125 aircraft supported the effort. General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Iran did not detect the bombers. “Iran’s fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran’s surface-to-air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission. We retained the element of surprise,” he said.<h2>Trump posted about mission before officials were briefed</h2>The operation’s secrecy was so tight that even top officials in Washington weren’t informed in advance. “Very few people knew the timing or nature of the plan,” Caine told reporters, adding that many only learnt of the mission after President Donald Trump announced it on social media late Saturday night. The US airstrikes followed an earlier barrage of missiles fired by Israel under Operation Rising Lion.Commercial satellite images shared by Reuters showed signs of major destruction at Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear facility. Experts said the deeply buried site and the equipment used for uranium enrichment may have been seriously damaged, though the extent is still unclear.Initial assessments suggested that all three nuclear sites targeted by the US had sustained significant damage. However, General Caine declined to say whether Iran’s nuclear programme had been fully dismantled.Following the US attack, Iran launched a missile assault on Israel. The strikes injured dozens and caused widespread destruction in Tel Aviv, leaving several buildings in ruins. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.

While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected.

An 18-hour flight each way, multiple mid-air refuellings, and clever diversions, this is what the US did to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. The mission, known as Operation Midnight Hammer, relied on misdirection and stealth to ensure maximum impact with minimum detection. A false trail: B-2s seen heading towards the Pacific On Saturday, a formation of B-2 stealth bombers took off from their base in Missouri. Observers spotted them flying toward Guam, a US territory in the Pacific. It appeared the US was signalling a strike was coming, just not immediately. But this flight was a decoy, meant to draw attention away from the real mission. Also read: Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire? While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected. US fighter jets also played a role in the deception, flying ahead of the stealth bombers to draw out enemy defences. As the bombers approached Iranian airspace, a US submarine fired over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles to disable critical air defences. Within minutes, the B-2s dropped 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 30,000 pounds, on Iran’s key nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Also read: Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal Largest-ever B-2 mission went undetected The operation marked the largest-ever coordinated B-2 strike and the second-longest B-2 flight in history, second only to post-9/11 missions. The Pentagon confirmed that more than 125 aircraft supported the effort. General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Iran did not detect the bombers. “Iran’s fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran’s surface-to-air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission. We retained the element of surprise,” he said. Trump posted about mission before officials were briefed The operation’s secrecy was so tight that even top officials in Washington weren’t informed in advance. “Very few people knew the timing or nature of the plan,” Caine told reporters, adding that many only learnt of the mission after President Donald Trump announced it on social media late Saturday night. The US airstrikes followed an earlier barrage of missiles fired by Israel under Operation Rising Lion. Commercial satellite images shared by Reuters showed signs of major destruction at Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear facility. Experts said the deeply buried site and the equipment used for uranium enrichment may have been seriously damaged, though the extent is still unclear. Initial assessments suggested that all three nuclear sites targeted by the US had sustained significant damage. However, General Caine declined to say whether Iran’s nuclear programme had been fully dismantled. Following the US attack, Iran launched a missile assault on Israel. The strikes injured dozens and caused widespread destruction in Tel Aviv, leaving several buildings in ruins. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.

While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected.

'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities

The US embassy in India said in a post on Monday that all applicants seeking F, M, or J non-immigrant visas—including students and exchange visitors—have to ensure that their social media profiles are set to ‘public’ to enable background checks. All available information will be used in the visa screening and vetting “to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security.” The development comes days after the United States announced that all foreign students applying for a visa must unlock their social media accounts for government review.&nbsp;In the post, the US Embassy in India said that “every visa adjudication is a national security decision,” and added that the applicants will have to “adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to ‘public’ to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States.”It further said that the US has been asking visa applicants to provide social media details on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms since 2019, and added that all available information will be used in the visa screening and vetting “to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security.”&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States… <a href="https://t.co/xotcfc3Qdo">pic.twitter.com/xotcfc3Qdo</a>&mdash; U.S. Embassy India (@USAndIndia) <a href="https://twitter.com/USAndIndia/status/1937089816660680824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Last month, the Trump administration had halted the scheduling of new visa interviews for foreign students seeking to study in the US to properly enhance the process of screening their social media activity.&nbsp;The US State Department said in a statement on June 18 that the scheduling of F, M, and J non-immigrant visa applications will resume soon, and applicants should check with the embassy or consulate website for appointment dates.The State Department further added, “The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests, and that all applicants credibly establish their eligibility for the visa sought, including that they intend to engage in activities consistent with the terms for their admission.”&nbsp;The US embassy has reiterated that holding a visa is not a right and that visas can be revoked if a person is found to be in violation of the law, even after arrival.

The United States has been asking visa applicants to provide social media details on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms since 2019, and now all available information will be used in the screening and vetting for visa.

The US embassy in India said in a post on Monday that all applicants seeking F, M, or J non-immigrant visas—including students and exchange visitors—have to ensure that their social media profiles are set to ‘public’ to enable background checks. All available information will be used in the visa screening and vetting “to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security.” The development comes days after the United States announced that all foreign students applying for a visa must unlock their social media accounts for government review. In the post, the US Embassy in India said that “every visa adjudication is a national security decision,” and added that the applicants will have to “adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to ‘public’ to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States.” It further said that the US has been asking visa applicants to provide social media details on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms since 2019, and added that all available information will be used in the visa screening and vetting “to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security.”

The United States has been asking visa applicants to provide social media details on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms since 2019, and now all available information will be used in the screening and vetting for visa.

Want US visa? First unlock your social media accounts for vetting, says embassy in India

Abdul Qadeer Khan, Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb, died of Covid in 2021. At the time of his death, he was a controversial figure, once a national hero of Pakistan who fell into disgrace after it emerged that he led a global proliferation network. That network was among key contributors to Iran's nuclear programme, currently under bombardment by Israel and the US amid an ongoing war. Here's the story of the Khan network.<h2>How AQ Khan proliferation network helped Iran nuclear programme</h2>The AQ Khan network's help to Iran's nuclear programme included helping the Islamic Republic build capabilities that could be used for nuclear weapons. &nbsp;Back in the 1980s and 1990s, the Pakistani metallurgist's clandestine proliferation network supplied Iran with critical nuclear technology as well as expertise.<h2>What did the AQ Khan Network give to Iran?</h2>It is believed that the AQ Khan network provided Iran with centrifuge technology and components. It included designs, components, and technical drawings for gas centrifuges, particularly P-1 and later P-2 models, used for enriching uranium. The designs were reportedly derived from those Khan had stole from from Dutch firm URENCO, when he was working in the Netherlands in the 1970s.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-israel-strikes-iran-idf-targets-irgc-hq-basij-hq-ideological-hq-1750678884219/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-israel-strikes-iran-idf-targets-irgc-hq-basij-hq-ideological-hq-1750678884219/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Iran got more than 2,000 centrifuge components and sub-assemblies, which helped build its secret pilot enrichment workshops in Kalaye Electrical Company, Tehran, among other places, in the 1989-1995 period. The Pakistani technology transfer is corroborated by the fact that centrifuges at Iran’s Natanz nuclear enrichment site looked similar to those at Pakistan’s Kahuta facility.<h2>Khan network gave Iran uranium enrichment technical know-how</h2>Khan’s network also reportedly gave Iran technical know-how, including blueprints and specifications for uranium enrichment. It is thought to have assisted in setting up uranium hexafluoride gas processes for Iran, that are critical for producing highly enriched uranium. HEU is a prerequisite for developing nuclear weapons.<h2>Did Pakistan give initial designs for nuclear weapons to Iran?</h2>According to multiple reports, Iranian scientists were trained in Pakistan on nuclear enrichment technology in 1988. It has been reported also that the Khan network gave Iran some blueprints for a Chinese nuclear warhead design. These reports are, however, inconclusive. But in 2018, when Israeli intel agency Mossad uncovered documents on the Amad Project, the secretive nuclear weapons programme of Iran in 1999–2003, it emerged that Pakistani designs may have been reworked in its warhead development. It is believed that the AQ Khan network provided assistance to Iran for high-explosive tests, detonator development for implosion-type bombs in this period.<h2>How did AQ Khan network operate?</h2>Centrifuge components and other nuclear materials were sent to Iran via intermediaries in countries like Dubai and Malaysia. It had been widely reported that a Sri Lankan, &nbsp;BSA Tahir, helped transfer P-2 centrifuge components to Iran for $3 million. Iran's payments for such transfers, running into millions of dollars, were made through foreign bank accounts.&nbsp;After its 2003 inspections, the UN nuclear agency IAEA reported that Iran’s P-1 model centrifuges were obtained from a 'foreign intermediary', identified as Khan, in 1989.<h2>Khan helped Iran cut time for enrichment capabilities</h2>The aid from the Khan network - both technology and expertise - possibly helped Iran cut its nuclear development timeline by a decade. It gave Iran a headstart in uranium enrichment at scale, in sites like Natanz.&nbsp;The Khan network was exposed in 2003, when Natanz facility - till then undeclared - was revealed. Iran agreed to name its suppliers, leading to global pressure on Pakistan, and the televised confession by AQ Khan in 2004 that led to his house arrest and eventual downfall from national hero to disgrace.<h2>Did Pakistani establishment help Khan in nuclear proliferation?</h2>In his confession and subsequent remarks, Khan said he acted own his own to sell nuclear technology to Iran as well as Libya, North Korea and possibly other countries. But at the time, allegations swirled that Pakistani officials such as Gen Mirza Aslam Beg either had approved, or were aware of, the Khan network's transfers to Iran. In subsequent years, Khan had alleged he faced pressure from the then Pakistani PM Benazir Bhutto's government, though these claims were rejected by officials. Interestingly, Iran's cooperation with IAEA at the time, and revelation of details of Khan's involvement in it, were seen by some in Pakistan as a betrayal of Pakistan's ‘Muslim brotherhood’ gesture. The episode caused a strain in Iran-Pakistan relations at the time.<h2>Could Iran have developed a nuclear programme without Khan network's help?</h2>Quite possibly so, because the Iranian nuclear programme was receiving help from several other countries, most notably Russia and China. But the AQ Khan network gave it much-needed acceleration.&nbsp;

The AQ Khan network helped Iranian nuclear programme by helping the Islamic Republic build capabilities that could possibly be used for nuclear weapons. 

Abdul Qadeer Khan, Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb, died of Covid in 2021. At the time of his death, he was a controversial figure, once a national hero of Pakistan who fell into disgrace after it emerged that he led a global proliferation network. That network was among key contributors to Iran's nuclear programme, currently under bombardment by Israel and the US amid an ongoing war. Here's the story of the Khan network. How AQ Khan proliferation network helped Iran nuclear programme The AQ Khan network's help to Iran's nuclear programme included helping the Islamic Republic build capabilities that could be used for nuclear weapons. Back in the 1980s and 1990s, the Pakistani metallurgist's clandestine proliferation network supplied Iran with critical nuclear technology as well as expertise. What did the AQ Khan Network give to Iran? It is believed that the AQ Khan network provided Iran with centrifuge technology and components. It included designs, components, and technical drawings for gas centrifuges, particularly P-1 and later P-2 models, used for enriching uranium. The designs were reportedly derived from those Khan had stole from from Dutch firm URENCO, when he was working in the Netherlands in the 1970s. https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-israel-strikes-iran-idf-targets-irgc-hq-basij-hq-ideological-hq-1750678884219/embed Iran got more than 2,000 centrifuge components and sub-assemblies, which helped build its secret pilot enrichment workshops in Kalaye Electrical Company, Tehran, among other places, in the 1989-1995 period. The Pakistani technology transfer is corroborated by the fact that centrifuges at Iran’s Natanz nuclear enrichment site looked similar to those at Pakistan’s Kahuta facility. Khan network gave Iran uranium enrichment technical know-how Khan’s network also reportedly gave Iran technical know-how, including blueprints and specifications for uranium enrichment. It is thought to have assisted in setting up uranium hexafluoride gas processes for Iran, that are critical for producing highly enriched uranium. HEU is a prerequisite for developing nuclear weapons. Did Pakistan give initial designs for nuclear weapons to Iran? According to multiple reports, Iranian scientists were trained in Pakistan on nuclear enrichment technology in 1988. It has been reported also that the Khan network gave Iran some blueprints for a Chinese nuclear warhead design. These reports are, however, inconclusive. But in 2018, when Israeli intel agency Mossad uncovered documents on the Amad Project, the secretive nuclear weapons programme of Iran in 1999–2003, it emerged that Pakistani designs may have been reworked in its warhead development. It is believed that the AQ Khan network provided assistance to Iran for high-explosive tests, detonator development for implosion-type bombs in this period. How did AQ Khan network operate? Centrifuge components and other nuclear materials were sent to Iran via intermediaries in countries like Dubai and Malaysia. It had been widely reported that a Sri Lankan, BSA Tahir, helped transfer P-2 centrifuge components to Iran for $3 million. Iran's payments for such transfers, running into millions of dollars, were made through foreign bank accounts. After its 2003 inspections, the UN nuclear agency IAEA reported that Iran’s P-1 model centrifuges were obtained from a 'foreign intermediary', identified as Khan, in 1989. Khan helped Iran cut time for enrichment capabilities The aid from the Khan network - both technology and expertise - possibly helped Iran cut its nuclear development timeline by a decade. It gave Iran a headstart in uranium enrichment at scale, in sites like Natanz. The Khan network was exposed in 2003, when Natanz facility - till then undeclared - was revealed. Iran agreed to name its suppliers, leading to global pressure on Pakistan, and the televised confession by AQ Khan in 2004 that led to his house arrest and eventual downfall from national hero to disgrace. Did Pakistani establishment help Khan in nuclear proliferation? In his confession and subsequent remarks, Khan said he acted own his own to sell nuclear technology to Iran as well as Libya, North Korea and possibly other countries. But at the time, allegations swirled that Pakistani officials such as Gen Mirza Aslam Beg either had approved, or were aware of, the Khan network's transfers to Iran. In subsequent years, Khan had alleged he faced pressure from the then Pakistani PM Benazir Bhutto's government, though these claims were rejected by officials. Interestingly, Iran's cooperation with IAEA at the time, and revelation of details of Khan's involvement in it, were seen by some in Pakistan as a betrayal of Pakistan's ‘Muslim brotherhood’ gesture. The episode caused a strain in Iran-Pakistan relations at the time. Could Iran have developed a nuclear programme without Khan network's help? Quite possibly so, because the Iranian nuclear programme was receiving help from several other countries, most notably Russia and China. But the AQ Khan network gave it much-needed acceleration.

The AQ Khan network's help to Iran's nuclear programme included helping the Islamic Republic build capabilities that could possibly be used for nuclear weapons.&nbsp;

When Pakistani AQ Khan network helped Iran's atomic programme and possibly helped its quest for a nuclear weapon

While missiles and drones dominate headlines in the Israel-Iran conflict, a parallel war is being fought in cyberspace. Behind the scenes, both countries have been launching cyberattacks on each other, and now, officials are warning that the United States could soon be caught in the crossfire. Following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, intelligence and military agencies are bracing for possible retaliatory cyber attacks targeting American infrastructure.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/how-many-times-has-the-us-used-the-b-2-bomber-every-mission-explained-1750676422903">How many times has the US used the B-2 bomber? Every mission&nbsp;explained</a><h2>US warns of cyber threats to critical systems</h2>On Sunday, the National Terrorism Advisory System issued a public warning about Iranian threats. These include potential attacks on “poorly secured US networks and Internet-connected devices.”&nbsp;“Low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely,” the advisory said, adding that actors “affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-iran-anticipate-the-us-strike-satellite-images-hint-tehran-secretly-shifted-enriched-uranium-before-us-bombs-hit-fordow-1750614164833">Did Iran anticipate US strike? Satellite images hint Tehran secretly shifted enriched uranium before US bombs hit Fordow</a>General Dan Caine, Chair of the Joint Chiefs, confirmed that US Cyber Command had been involved in the recent strikes on Iran but did not provide details. Both Cyber Command and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) declined to comment further.Last week, security agencies and infrastructure leaders urged companies to improve their cyber defences. Former CISA Director Jen Easterly said on LinkedIn that organisations must be prepared: “Shields up.”She added that Iran has a proven history of launching cyber attacks on civilian infrastructure, including “water systems, financial institutions, energy pipelines, government networks, and more.”<h2>Iran and Israel’s long-running digital rivalry</h2>Iran and Israel, both known for their cyber capabilities, have been trading blows online since at least 2023, after the Hamas attacks in October of that year. In one 2023 incident, an Iranian group hacked an Israeli hospital and leaked patient data. An Israeli group later retaliated by shutting down large parts of Iran’s fuel network.While both countries are active in cyber warfare, analysts say Israel holds the upper hand. “The Iranians … are good, they are emerging, but I don’t think they’re at the level of the Israelis or Americans,” analyst Alex Vatanka said.Over the past week, pro-Israeli hackers have intensified their attacks. The group known as Predatory Sparrow claimed responsibility for a cyberattack on Iran’s Bank Sepah, which disrupted customer accounts. They also took credit for stealing about $90 million from Nobitex, Iran’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, and posted the exchange’s source code online.Iranian state TV channels were also hit. Footage circulated online showed anti-regime messages being broadcast, reportedly the result of cyber intrusions. In response, the Iranian government cut off access to the internet across much of the country, with the blackout still in place on Sunday. “They suspect that there is maybe an attempt to mobilise public attention,” Vatanka said.<h2>Iranian leaders ditch digital devices</h2>Iranian officials have reportedly been told to stop using internet-connected or telecommunication devices to avoid further surveillance and disruptions. In a related episode last year, thousands of pagers used by Hezbollah exploded across Lebanon, injuring many.On Saturday, Israel’s National Cyber Directorate advised its citizens abroad not to fill out suspicious forms online, citing efforts by Iranian hackers to gather intelligence. At the same time, Israeli officials say Iran is once again trying to hack into internet-connected cameras for espionage purposes.John Hultquist, lead analyst at Google’s Threat Intelligence Group, posted on X that Iran frequently employs cyber tactics to exert psychological pressure. “I’m most concerned about cyber espionage against our leaders and surveillance aided by compromises in travel, hospitality, telecommunications, and other sectors,” he warned.

Iran and Israel, both known for their cyber capabilities, have been trading blows online since at least 2023, after the Hamas attacks in October of that year. In one 2023 incident, an Iranian group hacked an Israeli hospital and leaked patient data.

While missiles and drones dominate headlines in the Israel-Iran conflict, a parallel war is being fought in cyberspace. Behind the scenes, both countries have been launching cyberattacks on each other, and now, officials are warning that the United States could soon be caught in the crossfire. Following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, intelligence and military agencies are bracing for possible retaliatory cyber attacks targeting American infrastructure. Also read: How many times has the US used the B-2 bomber? Every mission explained US warns of cyber threats to critical systems On Sunday, the National Terrorism Advisory System issued a public warning about Iranian threats. These include potential attacks on “poorly secured US networks and Internet-connected devices.” “Low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely,” the advisory said, adding that actors “affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks.” Also read: Did Iran anticipate US strike? Satellite images hint Tehran secretly shifted enriched uranium before US bombs hit Fordow General Dan Caine, Chair of the Joint Chiefs, confirmed that US Cyber Command had been involved in the recent strikes on Iran but did not provide details. Both Cyber Command and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) declined to comment further. Last week, security agencies and infrastructure leaders urged companies to improve their cyber defences. Former CISA Director Jen Easterly said on LinkedIn that organisations must be prepared: “Shields up.” She added that Iran has a proven history of launching cyber attacks on civilian infrastructure, including “water systems, financial institutions, energy pipelines, government networks, and more.” Iran and Israel’s long-running digital rivalry Iran and Israel, both known for their cyber capabilities, have been trading blows online since at least 2023, after the Hamas attacks in October of that year. In one 2023 incident, an Iranian group hacked an Israeli hospital and leaked patient data. An Israeli group later retaliated by shutting down large parts of Iran’s fuel network. While both countries are active in cyber warfare, analysts say Israel holds the upper hand. “The Iranians … are good, they are emerging, but I don’t think they’re at the level of the Israelis or Americans,” analyst Alex Vatanka said. Over the past week, pro-Israeli hackers have intensified their attacks. The group known as Predatory Sparrow claimed responsibility for a cyberattack on Iran’s Bank Sepah, which disrupted customer accounts. They also took credit for stealing about $90 million from Nobitex, Iran’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, and posted the exchange’s source code online. Iranian state TV channels were also hit. Footage circulated online showed anti-regime messages being broadcast, reportedly the result of cyber intrusions. In response, the Iranian government cut off access to the internet across much of the country, with the blackout still in place on Sunday. “They suspect that there is maybe an attempt to mobilise public attention,” Vatanka said. Iranian leaders ditch digital devices Iranian officials have reportedly been told to stop using internet-connected or telecommunication devices to avoid further surveillance and disruptions. In a related episode last year, thousands of pagers used by Hezbollah exploded across Lebanon, injuring many. On Saturday, Israel’s National Cyber Directorate advised its citizens abroad not to fill out suspicious forms online, citing efforts by Iranian hackers to gather intelligence. At the same time, Israeli officials say Iran is once again trying to hack into internet-connected cameras for espionage purposes. John Hultquist, lead analyst at Google’s Threat Intelligence Group, posted on X that Iran frequently employs cyber tactics to exert psychological pressure. “I’m most concerned about cyber espionage against our leaders and surveillance aided by compromises in travel, hospitality, telecommunications, and other sectors,” he warned.

Iran and Israel, both known for their cyber capabilities, have been trading blows online since at least 2023, after the Hamas attacks in October of that year. In one 2023 incident, an Iranian group hacked an Israeli hospital and leaked patient data.

Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?

As the United States deploys its most advanced B-2 Spirit stealth bombers in support of Israel amid growing tensions with Iran, few realise that this cutting-edge aircraft owes part of its existence to the Third Reich’s secret war files. The sleek flying wing design of the B-2, capable of evading radar and penetrating deep into enemy airspace, was inspired by a top-secret Nazi project known as the Horten Ho 229, a revolutionary jet developed in the final years of Adolf Hitler’s Germany. This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers. Their expertise, once devoted to Hitler’s war machine, soon powered America’s own military ambitions from space travel to stealth technology.&nbsp;During the Second World War, the Horten brothers, Reimar and Walter, were pioneers of aviation design, working under the Luftwaffe’s command. Their masterpiece was the Ho 229, the world’s first jet-powered flying wing, a radical aircraft without tail or fuselage. Its shape, designed for aerodynamic efficiency, had the added effect of reducing its visibility to radar, a principle we now call “stealth”.&nbsp;The Ho 229 never flew in combat, as the war ended before the aircraft could be fully developed. However, in April 1945, American forces overran the German base where the prototype was stored. Recognising its potential, the Allies seized not only the airframe but also an entire trove of scientific documents — blueprints, notes, and aerodynamic data.&nbsp;These materials became part of the haul brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip. The controversial programme secretly transported more than 1,600 German scientists, many of whom had worked for the Nazi regime, to help the US counter Soviet advances in military and space technology. Among the recruits were experts in rocketry, aerodynamics, and aircraft design.In the decades that followed, American engineers continued exploring the flying wing concept, heavily informed by the Horten brothers’ work. This research culminated in the creation of the B-2 Spirit, first flown in 1989 and now the most advanced stealth bomber in the world.&nbsp;With its elegant curved wings, composite materials and radar-absorbing skin, the B-2 can evade even the most sophisticated air defences. Its ability to deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads at intercontinental range has made it one of the most formidable aircraft ever built.Ironically, as the B-2 now flies missions over the Middle East to assist Israel, a nation founded in the shadow of the Holocaust, its design is rooted in Nazi aviation experiments once meant to serve Hitler’s ambitions. The historical twist is stark, technology born in a bid to win a fascist war is now employed to defend a democratic state threatened by modern adversaries.&nbsp;Operation Paperclip remains one of the more controversial chapters of post-war history. While it undeniably advanced US scientific leadership and Northrop Gunnman's innovation but it also involved moral compromises, as Nazi officials and collaborators were quietly granted asylum and employment in exchange for their technical expertise.&nbsp;Today, the B-2’s legacy is inseparable from this complex history. As these stealth bombers continue to patrol skies in support of Israel, they carry with them a hidden lineage — one that began in the dark heart of Nazi Germany, was reshaped by American ingenuity, and now plays a key role in global power projection.

This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers.

As the United States deploys its most advanced B-2 Spirit stealth bombers in support of Israel amid growing tensions with Iran, few realise that this cutting-edge aircraft owes part of its existence to the Third Reich’s secret war files. The sleek flying wing design of the B-2, capable of evading radar and penetrating deep into enemy airspace, was inspired by a top-secret Nazi project known as the Horten Ho 229, a revolutionary jet developed in the final years of Adolf Hitler’s Germany. This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers. Their expertise, once devoted to Hitler’s war machine, soon powered America’s own military ambitions from space travel to stealth technology. During the Second World War, the Horten brothers, Reimar and Walter, were pioneers of aviation design, working under the Luftwaffe’s command. Their masterpiece was the Ho 229, the world’s first jet-powered flying wing, a radical aircraft without tail or fuselage. Its shape, designed for aerodynamic efficiency, had the added effect of reducing its visibility to radar, a principle we now call “stealth”. The Ho 229 never flew in combat, as the war ended before the aircraft could be fully developed. However, in April 1945, American forces overran the German base where the prototype was stored. Recognising its potential, the Allies seized not only the airframe but also an entire trove of scientific documents — blueprints, notes, and aerodynamic data. These materials became part of the haul brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip. The controversial programme secretly transported more than 1,600 German scientists, many of whom had worked for the Nazi regime, to help the US counter Soviet advances in military and space technology. Among the recruits were experts in rocketry, aerodynamics, and aircraft design. In the decades that followed, American engineers continued exploring the flying wing concept, heavily informed by the Horten brothers’ work. This research culminated in the creation of the B-2 Spirit, first flown in 1989 and now the most advanced stealth bomber in the world. With its elegant curved wings, composite materials and radar-absorbing skin, the B-2 can evade even the most sophisticated air defences. Its ability to deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads at intercontinental range has made it one of the most formidable aircraft ever built. Ironically, as the B-2 now flies missions over the Middle East to assist Israel, a nation founded in the shadow of the Holocaust, its design is rooted in Nazi aviation experiments once meant to serve Hitler’s ambitions. The historical twist is stark, technology born in a bid to win a fascist war is now employed to defend a democratic state threatened by modern adversaries. Operation Paperclip remains one of the more controversial chapters of post-war history. While it undeniably advanced US scientific leadership and Northrop Gunnman's innovation but it also involved moral compromises, as Nazi officials and collaborators were quietly granted asylum and employment in exchange for their technical expertise. Today, the B-2’s legacy is inseparable from this complex history. As these stealth bombers continue to patrol skies in support of Israel, they carry with them a hidden lineage — one that began in the dark heart of Nazi Germany, was reshaped by American ingenuity, and now plays a key role in global power projection.

This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers.

B-2 Bomber helped Israel, but its origins lie in Hitler’s secret Nazi war files

After second attack on Fordow nuclear plant in Iran by the United states, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi on Monday (June 23) said that the strikes likely have caused 'Significant damage' to the nuke plant. &nbsp;However, he did say that no one is in a a position to have fully assessed the underground damage.&nbsp;"At this time, no one, including the IAEA, is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow. Given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred," said Grossi.Speaking further he said that Iran has confirmed there is "no increase in off-site radiation levels at all three sites," and that IAEA will continue to monitor the situation.&nbsp;"Iran has informed the IAEA that there was no increase in off-site radiation levels at all three sites. The situation at the other sites remains as I have described in my past updates, and the IAEA is not aware of any further attacks on Iran's nuclear sites since those on Sunday morning. We continue to monitor the situation and encourage the Iranian regulator to maintain its contact with the IAEA's incident and emergency centre," he said.&nbsp;Meanwhile, the IAEA appealed to allow its inspectors to go back to Iran's nuke plants to asses the situation and stock of the uranium stockpiles.&nbsp;"Allow IAEA inspectors, the guardians on our on behalf of the NPT to go back to Iran’s nuclear sites and account for the stockpiles of uranium” including the “400 kilograms enriched to 60 percent”, Grossi told an emergency meeting of the organisation’s headquarters in Vienna.

IAEA also appealed to allow its inspectors to go back to Irans nuke plants to asses the situation and stock of the uranium stockpiles.

After second attack on Fordow nuclear plant in Iran by the United states, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi on Monday (June 23) said that the strikes likely have caused 'Significant damage' to the nuke plant. However, he did say that no one is in a a position to have fully assessed the underground damage. "At this time, no one, including the IAEA, is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow. Given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred," said Grossi. Speaking further he said that Iran has confirmed there is "no increase in off-site radiation levels at all three sites," and that IAEA will continue to monitor the situation. "Iran has informed the IAEA that there was no increase in off-site radiation levels at all three sites. The situation at the other sites remains as I have described in my past updates, and the IAEA is not aware of any further attacks on Iran's nuclear sites since those on Sunday morning. We continue to monitor the situation and encourage the Iranian regulator to maintain its contact with the IAEA's incident and emergency centre," he said. Meanwhile, the IAEA appealed to allow its inspectors to go back to Iran's nuke plants to asses the situation and stock of the uranium stockpiles. "Allow IAEA inspectors, the guardians on our on behalf of the NPT to go back to Iran’s nuclear sites and account for the stockpiles of uranium” including the “400 kilograms enriched to 60 percent”, Grossi told an emergency meeting of the organisation’s headquarters in Vienna.

IAEA also appealed to allow its inspectors to go back to Iran's nuke plants to asses the situation and stock of the uranium stockpiles.

Given explosive payload utilised, 'significant damage' expected to Fordow nuclear plant: IAEA

When President Donald Trump abruptly left the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, a full day ahead of schedule, the official explanation was swift and stern: the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran required his immediate presence in Washington. But among diplomats and intelligence officials, a more unsettling theory quickly began to spread— one that linked Trump’s exit not just to the Middle East, but to threats much closer to home. Specifically, there were reports that Iran had activated or threatened to activate sleeper cells within the United States. Could this be the real reason behind the sudden leaving of the American president from the G7 stage?&nbsp;According to senior intelligence sources, chatter picked up in the days leading up to the summit suggested that Tehran, reeling from the devastation inflicted was preparing asymmetric retaliation. One threat loomed particularly large: attacks on American targets through covert operatives embedded in the West. The CIA reportedly flagged multiple signals indicating potential “active positioning” of these sleeper units.&nbsp;Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron, in a pointed remark to the press, claimed Trump was leaving “to play a role in de-escalation” between Israel and Iran, hinting at US backchannel talks. But Trump fired back while still in the air, using Truth Social to accuse Macron of being “publicity-seeking” and “getting it wrong.” He added ominously: “Much bigger than that. Stay tuned.” Those five words — “much bigger than that” — have since become the focus of intense speculation. Was Trump referring to the evolving war in the Middle East? Or was he alluding to a more imminent threat — a plot that could potentially unfold within US borders? While the White House has continued to cite the Iran war as the central reason for his return, officials have notably avoided denying reports of heightened domestic threat alerts issued to major cities.&nbsp;What are sleeper cells?Sleeper cells are the term used to refer to covert operatives that are embedded in a target country with no immediate mission until activated or called to action by their operatives.These operatives often live quiet, unassuming lives, fully assimilated—working regular jobs, holding down routine roles—until they suddenly "wake up" to execute a mission. Sleeper cells are arguably the most insidious and unpredictable threat, because these operatives hide in plain sight, often invisible until it's too late.&nbsp;The US Department of Homeland Security has once again sounded the alarm on Iran's global threat posture, warning that the Islamic Republic is expected to continue sponsoring terrorism and plotting attacks against individuals, including current and former American officials. The latest assessment echoes a similar report issued by DHS under the Biden administration in 2024.&nbsp;Mike Nelson, a retired Special Forces lieutenant colonel with CENTCOM experience, told News Nation that Hezbollah has had sleeper cells in the western hemisphere for some time, including coming through Venezuela. He said that Iranians and Hezbollah have used these cells in the past, including during the Jewish Community Centre bombing in Buenos Aires in 1994.&nbsp;"It seems likely (Hezbollah and Iran) would try to activate sleeper cells in the United States as retaliation if the U.S. joins in the strikes, so it would be prudent for the FBI to be monitoring," said Nelson. According to Nelson, Iran’s regime views its survival as the endgame. "The Iranian regime wants this to end with them in power, and their primary concern is survival," he said.

Was Trump’s sudden G7 exit linked to Iranian sleeper cell threat? Report claims

When President Donald Trump abruptly left the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, a full day ahead of schedule, the official explanation was swift and stern: the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran required his immediate presence in Washington. But among diplomats and intelligence officials, a more unsettling theory quickly began to spread— one that linked Trump’s exit not just to the Middle East, but to threats much closer to home. Specifically, there were reports that Iran had activated or threatened to activate sleeper cells within the United States. Could this be the real reason behind the sudden leaving of the American president from the G7 stage? According to senior intelligence sources, chatter picked up in the days leading up to the summit suggested that Tehran, reeling from the devastation inflicted was preparing asymmetric retaliation. One threat loomed particularly large: attacks on American targets through covert operatives embedded in the West. The CIA reportedly flagged multiple signals indicating potential “active positioning” of these sleeper units. Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron, in a pointed remark to the press, claimed Trump was leaving “to play a role in de-escalation” between Israel and Iran, hinting at US backchannel talks. But Trump fired back while still in the air, using Truth Social to accuse Macron of being “publicity-seeking” and “getting it wrong.” He added ominously: “Much bigger than that. Stay tuned.” Those five words — “much bigger than that” — have since become the focus of intense speculation. Was Trump referring to the evolving war in the Middle East? Or was he alluding to a more imminent threat — a plot that could potentially unfold within US borders? While the White House has continued to cite the Iran war as the central reason for his return, officials have notably avoided denying reports of heightened domestic threat alerts issued to major cities. What are sleeper cells? Sleeper cells are the term used to refer to covert operatives that are embedded in a target country with no immediate mission until activated or called to action by their operatives. These operatives often live quiet, unassuming lives, fully assimilated—working regular jobs, holding down routine roles—until they suddenly "wake up" to execute a mission. Sleeper cells are arguably the most insidious and unpredictable threat, because these operatives hide in plain sight, often invisible until it's too late. The US Department of Homeland Security has once again sounded the alarm on Iran's global threat posture, warning that the Islamic Republic is expected to continue sponsoring terrorism and plotting attacks against individuals, including current and former American officials. The latest assessment echoes a similar report issued by DHS under the Biden administration in 2024. Mike Nelson, a retired Special Forces lieutenant colonel with CENTCOM experience, told News Nation that Hezbollah has had sleeper cells in the western hemisphere for some time, including coming through Venezuela. He said that Iranians and Hezbollah have used these cells in the past, including during the Jewish Community Centre bombing in Buenos Aires in 1994. "It seems likely (Hezbollah and Iran) would try to activate sleeper cells in the United States as retaliation if the U.S. joins in the strikes, so it would be prudent for the FBI to be monitoring," said Nelson. According to Nelson, Iran’s regime views its survival as the endgame. "The Iranian regime wants this to end with them in power, and their primary concern is survival," he said.

Sleeper cells are the term used to refer to covert operatives that are embedded in a target country with no immediate mission until activated

Israeli airstrikes on Monday (June 23) hit the entrance of Iran's notorious Evin Prison, allowing some prisoners to escape, according to multiple reports. Iranian state media aired footage of what appeared to be black-and-white CCTV footage of a strike. The strike was carried out by an Israeli drone, according to some reports. Evin holds dozens of prisoners, including dual nationals and Westerners. They are used by Iran as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West that often end in prisoner swaps.<h2>Evin prison attacked? What we know</h2>Israel has not immediately acknowledged the strike, but reports said family members of political prisoners and some local residents tried to reach the prison in the wake of the attack. The expat media outlet Iran International reported that the strike hit the entrance gate to the prison with the aim of allowing prisoners to escape.&nbsp;Citing the Judiciary Media Center, Tasnim news agency said the situation in the prison is under control. All resources are being utilised to manage the prison complex, it added.It acknowledged that ‘projectiles’ from Israel damaged parts of the prison.<h2>What is Evin prison, ‘the Bastille of Iran’?</h2>Often referred to as 'Iran’s Bastille' in comparison to the historic French prison, Evin is a large and heavily fortified prison complex in Tehran. It holds some of the most high-profile political prisoners, anti-regime activists, journalists and academics. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/operation-midnight-hammer-did-us-strikes-on-iran-achieve-their-objective-1750673466803/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/operation-midnight-hammer-did-us-strikes-on-iran-achieve-their-objective-1750673466803/embed</a>&nbsp;There are special units for political prisoners and those with Western ties.Established in 1972, it is currently run by the IRGC or Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps.After the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Evin became the Iranian regime's most notorious detention facility and a symbol of its repression of dissent. The US and European Union have in the past issued sanctions against the prison.<h2>Evin prison has a history of abuse</h2>Over the years, Evin Prison has been criticised for human rights abuses, documented in various reports.The torture methods used in the prison include electric shocks, mock executions, beatings, sexual abuse, forced confessions, and sleep deprivation. There are cells for solitary confinement.&nbsp;High-profile cases in recent years include the mistreatment of scholar Mahvash Seydal and &nbsp;Italian reporter Cecilia Sala. Seydal was denied medical care deliberately. Those in the jail include minority community members like the Baháʼís and Christian converts. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing developments in the Israel-Iran conflict. In this context, claims and counterclaims are being made online and offline. However, we cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, photos, and videos.

Evin holds dozens of prisoners, including dual nationals and Westerners. They are used by Iran as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West that often end in prisoner swaps.

Israeli airstrikes on Monday (June 23) hit the entrance of Iran's notorious Evin Prison, allowing some prisoners to escape, according to multiple reports. Iranian state media aired footage of what appeared to be black-and-white CCTV footage of a strike. The strike was carried out by an Israeli drone, according to some reports. Evin holds dozens of prisoners, including dual nationals and Westerners. They are used by Iran as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West that often end in prisoner swaps. Evin prison attacked? What we know Israel has not immediately acknowledged the strike, but reports said family members of political prisoners and some local residents tried to reach the prison in the wake of the attack. The expat media outlet Iran International reported that the strike hit the entrance gate to the prison with the aim of allowing prisoners to escape. Citing the Judiciary Media Center, Tasnim news agency said the situation in the prison is under control. All resources are being utilised to manage the prison complex, it added. It acknowledged that ‘projectiles’ from Israel damaged parts of the prison. What is Evin prison, ‘the Bastille of Iran’? Often referred to as 'Iran’s Bastille' in comparison to the historic French prison, Evin is a large and heavily fortified prison complex in Tehran. It holds some of the most high-profile political prisoners, anti-regime activists, journalists and academics. https://www.wionews.com/videos/operation-midnight-hammer-did-us-strikes-on-iran-achieve-their-objective-1750673466803/embed There are special units for political prisoners and those with Western ties. Established in 1972, it is currently run by the IRGC or Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps. After the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Evin became the Iranian regime's most notorious detention facility and a symbol of its repression of dissent. The US and European Union have in the past issued sanctions against the prison. Evin prison has a history of abuse Over the years, Evin Prison has been criticised for human rights abuses, documented in various reports. The torture methods used in the prison include electric shocks, mock executions, beatings, sexual abuse, forced confessions, and sleep deprivation. There are cells for solitary confinement. High-profile cases in recent years include the mistreatment of scholar Mahvash Seydal and Italian reporter Cecilia Sala. Seydal was denied medical care deliberately. Those in the jail include minority community members like the Baháʼís and Christian converts. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing developments in the Israel-Iran conflict. In this context, claims and counterclaims are being made online and offline. However, we cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, photos, and videos.

Known for inhumane conditions, Evin holds dozens of prisoners, including dual nationals and Westerners. They are used by Iran as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West that often end in prisoner swaps.

Israeli airstrike hits entrance to Iran's notorious Evin Prison, prisoners escape, say reports. Why it matters

President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 22) claimed that US air raids had “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s enrichment facilities. Yet, experts and officials remain cautious about the actual ground impact and the long-term damage to Iran’s nuclear programme.<h2>Does Iran still have its enriched uranium?</h2>An adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Shamkhani, insisted that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is intact, despite the strikes. In a post on X, he said, “Even if nuclear sites are destroyed, the game isn’t over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, and politics will remain. … Surprises will continue!”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-s-fordow-still-not-completely-obliterated-after-being-hit-by-us-bunker-busters-here-s-what-israeli-and-us-intelligence-reveal-1750613456192">Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal</a>Similarly, Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation, said, “They should know that this industry has roots in our country and the roots of this national industry cannot be destroyed. Of course, we have suffered damage, but this is not the first time that the industry has suffered damage.”<h2>Is there evidence they moved uranium before the strike?</h2>Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment. The Open Source Centre in London also analyses such unusual activity as preparation for an imminent attack. Hassan Abedini, deputy political head of Iran’s state media, said all enriched uranium had been cleared from Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, meaning there were no radioactive materials left to be struck.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/in-pics-how-much-damage-did-us-strikes-cause-to-iran-s-fordow-nuclear-site-here-s-what-satellite-images-reveal-1750610564427">In Pics: How much damage did US strikes cause to Iran’s Fordow nuclear site? Here's what satellite images reveal</a><h2>Does Iran have other hidden enrichment sites?</h2>Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation a few days ago said that they have another “secure and invulnerable location” housing centrifuges.

Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment.

President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 22) claimed that US air raids had “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s enrichment facilities. Yet, experts and officials remain cautious about the actual ground impact and the long-term damage to Iran’s nuclear programme. Does Iran still have its enriched uranium? An adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Shamkhani, insisted that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is intact, despite the strikes. In a post on X, he said, “Even if nuclear sites are destroyed, the game isn’t over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, and politics will remain. … Surprises will continue!” Also read: Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal Similarly, Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation, said, “They should know that this industry has roots in our country and the roots of this national industry cannot be destroyed. Of course, we have suffered damage, but this is not the first time that the industry has suffered damage.” Is there evidence they moved uranium before the strike? Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment. The Open Source Centre in London also analyses such unusual activity as preparation for an imminent attack. Hassan Abedini, deputy political head of Iran’s state media, said all enriched uranium had been cleared from Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, meaning there were no radioactive materials left to be struck. Also read: In Pics: How much damage did US strikes cause to Iran’s Fordow nuclear site? Here's what satellite images reveal Does Iran have other hidden enrichment sites? Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation a few days ago said that they have another “secure and invulnerable location” housing centrifuges.

Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment.

Did Iran anticipate US strike? Satellite images hint Tehran secretly shifted enriched uranium before US bombs hit Fordow

President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 22) declared the overnight US airstrikes on Iran a “success,” claiming that Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely and totally obliterated.” However, new satellite imagery and early intelligence assessments paint a more cautious picture.Among the primary targets of the US strikes was Fordow, Iran’s most fortified nuclear site. The Pentagon confirmed that 30,000-pound bunker-busting bombs were used in the operation, targeting three nuclear facilities, including Fordow.<h2>Israeli intelligence sees serious damage, but not total destruction</h2>According to two Israeli officials quoted by The New York Times, the Fordow site sustained serious damage but has not been fully destroyed. Their early analysis is based on Israeli satellite images and aerial surveillance, which suggest Iran may have moved uranium and sensitive equipment out of the facility shortly before the strikes. The officials said the presence of 16 cargo trucks near the site before the attack indicates Iran was likely preparing for a possible hit. It’s still unclear what was removed.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/in-pics-how-much-damage-did-us-strikes-cause-to-iran-s-fordow-nuclear-site-here-s-what-satellite-images-reveal-1750610564427">In Pics: How much damage did US strikes cause to Iran’s Fordow nuclear site? Here's what satellite images reveal</a><h2>What do US officials say?</h2>A senior US official also confirmed that Fordow was not wiped out, but said it had been “severely damaged” and taken off the table. While some initial reports suggested that even 12 bunker-buster bombs might not be enough to destroy Fordow due to its deep underground structure, the Pentagon is still assessing the extent of the impact.Speaking at a press briefing, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed the President’s optimism but said it was “too soon to say whether Iran retained some nuclear capability.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-b-2-bombers-tomahawk-missiles-and-125-jets-what-weapons-did-us-use-to-bomb-iran-s-fordow-natanz-and-esfahan-nuclear-sites-1750597370320">'B-2 Bombers, Tomahawk missiles': What weapons did US use to 'completely obliterate' Iran’s key nuclear sites?</a><h2>Satellite images show signs of impact</h2>Imagery released by Planet Labs taken soon after the US strikes shows changes to the ground around the Fordow site, including visible strike points and displaced dust, suggesting impact locations. Additional images from Maxar Technologies show a large number of trucks parked at one of the entrances in the days before the attack.Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, speaking at a press conference, said that the country is “calculating the damages” from the US strikes. No official casualty numbers or detailed damage reports have yet been released by Tehran.

While some initial reports suggested that even 12 bunker-buster bombs might not be enough to destroy Fordow due to its deep underground structure, the Pentagon is still assessing the extent of the impact.

President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 22) declared the overnight US airstrikes on Iran a “success,” claiming that Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely and totally obliterated.” However, new satellite imagery and early intelligence assessments paint a more cautious picture. Among the primary targets of the US strikes was Fordow, Iran’s most fortified nuclear site. The Pentagon confirmed that 30,000-pound bunker-busting bombs were used in the operation, targeting three nuclear facilities, including Fordow. Israeli intelligence sees serious damage, but not total destruction According to two Israeli officials quoted by The New York Times, the Fordow site sustained serious damage but has not been fully destroyed. Their early analysis is based on Israeli satellite images and aerial surveillance, which suggest Iran may have moved uranium and sensitive equipment out of the facility shortly before the strikes. The officials said the presence of 16 cargo trucks near the site before the attack indicates Iran was likely preparing for a possible hit. It’s still unclear what was removed. Also read: In Pics: How much damage did US strikes cause to Iran’s Fordow nuclear site? Here's what satellite images reveal What do US officials say? A senior US official also confirmed that Fordow was not wiped out, but said it had been “severely damaged” and taken off the table. While some initial reports suggested that even 12 bunker-buster bombs might not be enough to destroy Fordow due to its deep underground structure, the Pentagon is still assessing the extent of the impact. Speaking at a press briefing, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed the President’s optimism but said it was “too soon to say whether Iran retained some nuclear capability.” Also read: 'B-2 Bombers, Tomahawk missiles': What weapons did US use to 'completely obliterate' Iran’s key nuclear sites? Satellite images show signs of impact Imagery released by Planet Labs taken soon after the US strikes shows changes to the ground around the Fordow site, including visible strike points and displaced dust, suggesting impact locations. Additional images from Maxar Technologies show a large number of trucks parked at one of the entrances in the days before the attack. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, speaking at a press conference, said that the country is “calculating the damages” from the US strikes. No official casualty numbers or detailed damage reports have yet been released by Tehran.

While some initial reports suggested that even 12 bunker-buster bombs might not be enough to destroy Fordow due to its deep underground structure, the Pentagon is still assessing the extent of the impact.

Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal

The United States on Sunday (June 22) struck Iran's three nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, amid ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran. US President Donald Trump confirmed the attack, adding that B-2 stealth bombers were involved in the attack. This is not the first time the US has deployed B-2 bombers in combat. Here’s every known time the B-2 has flown into battle.<h2>What is the B-2 bomber?</h2>The B-2 Spirit is a long-range stealth bomber developed by Northrop Grumman. Built to avoid radar detection, it can fly over 11,000km without refueling and carry a mix of conventional and nuclear weapons.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-us-joined-after-witnessing-israel-s-impotence-iran-s-president-breaks-silence-after-us-strike-on-nuclear-sites-what-he-said-1750602966123">'US joined after witnessing Israel’s impotence': Iran's President breaks silence after US strike on nuclear sites - What he said</a><h2>First use: Kosovo War (1999)</h2>The B-2 made its combat debut during NATO’s Operation Allied Force in the former Yugoslavia. Flying directly from Missouri in the United States to Serbia and back, the bombers conducted precision strikes on key Serbian targets such as airfields and command centres. The missions lasted over 30 hours and marked the bomber’s first real-world test.<h2>Afghanistan (2001–2002)</h2>During the early stages of the war in Afghanistan, B-2 bombers hit Taliban bunkers, training camps, and cave complexes. The missions began in the US and involved mid-air refuelling, proving the B-2’s global reach and endurance.<h2>Iraq (2003)</h2>In March 2003, B-2s were used in the opening strikes of the Iraq War. They dropped bunker-buster bombs on Saddam Hussein’s suspected command bunkers and missile facilities, playing a key role in disabling leadership and air defences early in the campaign.<h2>Libya (2011)</h2>As part of NATO’s Operation Odyssey Dawn, the US sent three B-2 bombers from the continental US to bomb airfields and hardened aircraft shelters in Libya. This surprise attack helped enforce a no-fly zone and crippled Libya’s air power within hours.<h2>Syria (2017)</h2>Although not officially confirmed, multiple reports suggest that B-2 bombers were used in strikes against ISIS in eastern Syria. These missions allegedly involved the use of GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, which are designed to hit deep, fortified targets.<h2>Yemen (2024)</h2>In October 2024, the US used B-2 bombers to strike Iran-backed Houthi rebel facilities in Yemen. The Pentagon described the move as a “unique demonstration” of the B-2’s ability to hit deeply buried and hardened sites, with then-Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin highlighting its strategic significance.<h2>Iran (2025)</h2>In the most recent and perhaps most significant deployment, the US used B-2 bombers in June 2025 to strike three major Iranian nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. President Donald Trump called the operation a “spectacular military success”, claiming the sites had been “completely and fully obliterated.”

The B-2 Spirit is a long-range stealth bomber developed by Northrop Grumman. Built to avoid radar detection, it can fly over 11,000km without refueling and carry a mix of conventional and nuclear weapons.

The United States on Sunday (June 22) struck Iran's three nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, amid ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran. US President Donald Trump confirmed the attack, adding that B-2 stealth bombers were involved in the attack. This is not the first time the US has deployed B-2 bombers in combat. Here’s every known time the B-2 has flown into battle. What is the B-2 bomber? The B-2 Spirit is a long-range stealth bomber developed by Northrop Grumman. Built to avoid radar detection, it can fly over 11,000km without refueling and carry a mix of conventional and nuclear weapons. Also read: 'US joined after witnessing Israel’s impotence': Iran's President breaks silence after US strike on nuclear sites - What he said First use: Kosovo War (1999) The B-2 made its combat debut during NATO’s Operation Allied Force in the former Yugoslavia. Flying directly from Missouri in the United States to Serbia and back, the bombers conducted precision strikes on key Serbian targets such as airfields and command centres. The missions lasted over 30 hours and marked the bomber’s first real-world test. Afghanistan (2001–2002) During the early stages of the war in Afghanistan, B-2 bombers hit Taliban bunkers, training camps, and cave complexes. The missions began in the US and involved mid-air refuelling, proving the B-2’s global reach and endurance. Iraq (2003) In March 2003, B-2s were used in the opening strikes of the Iraq War. They dropped bunker-buster bombs on Saddam Hussein’s suspected command bunkers and missile facilities, playing a key role in disabling leadership and air defences early in the campaign. Libya (2011) As part of NATO’s Operation Odyssey Dawn, the US sent three B-2 bombers from the continental US to bomb airfields and hardened aircraft shelters in Libya. This surprise attack helped enforce a no-fly zone and crippled Libya’s air power within hours. Syria (2017) Although not officially confirmed, multiple reports suggest that B-2 bombers were used in strikes against ISIS in eastern Syria. These missions allegedly involved the use of GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, which are designed to hit deep, fortified targets. Yemen (2024) In October 2024, the US used B-2 bombers to strike Iran-backed Houthi rebel facilities in Yemen. The Pentagon described the move as a “unique demonstration” of the B-2’s ability to hit deeply buried and hardened sites, with then-Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin highlighting its strategic significance. Iran (2025) In the most recent and perhaps most significant deployment, the US used B-2 bombers in June 2025 to strike three major Iranian nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. President Donald Trump called the operation a “spectacular military success”, claiming the sites had been “completely and fully obliterated.”

The B-2 Spirit is a long-range stealth bomber developed by Northrop Grumman. Built to avoid radar detection, it can fly over 11,000km without refueling and carry a mix of conventional and nuclear weapons.

'Iran not the first time': How many times has US used B-2 bomber in combat?

In a major military operation, the United States bombed three of Iran’s key nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, claiming they were “totally and completely obliterated”. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth dubbed the attack 'Operation Hammer'. After the attack, President Donald Trump took to Truth Social saying that Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely destroyed”. He warned that if Iran retaliated, the US would respond with “force far greater than what was witnessed tonight”. Iran has promised “everlasting consequences” in response to the strikes. The situation remains tense, with US forces in the region on high alert.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-iran-war-every-american-now-a-target-us-citizens-at-risk-of-hostage-taking-after-trump-strikes-iran-s-nuclear-sites-1750594714096">'Every American now a target': US citizens at risk of 'hostage-taking' after Trump strikes Iran’s nuclear sites</a>Here are all the weapons Washington used to hit Iran's fortified and deeply buried nuclear sites<h2>What aircraft carried out the strike?</h2>The main force behind the operation was the US Air Force’s B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, the only aircraft capable of delivering bombs powerful enough to penetrate Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. According to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, these bombers went into Iranian airspace and came back undetected. He described the operation as the longest B-2 mission since 2001, and the largest B-2 strike in history.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-iran-war-us-bomb-iran-israel-iran-war-missiles-proxies-or-strait-of-hormuz-how-iran-might-hit-back-at-the-us-after-nuclear-site-bombings-1750591176138">Israel-Iran war: Missiles, proxies or Strait of Hormuz? How Iran might hit back at the US after nuclear site bombings</a><h2>What kind of bombs were used?</h2>To break through Iran’s fortified sites, the US used Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs). These are 30,000lb bunker-busting bombs designed to destroy underground targets. General Dan Caine, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, confirmed that 14 MOPs were dropped on two of the three nuclear sites, Fordow and Natanz. This marked the first time these massive bombs were ever used in combat.<h2>Did the US use missiles too?</h2>As the B-2 bombers targeted Fordow and Natanz, a US submarine-launched more than 24 Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles at the Esfahan nuclear site. The Tomahawk missiles were the last weapons to hit and helped complete the operation without triggering any known Iranian defences.<h2>How many aircraft were involved in the operation?</h2>General Caine said that more than 125 US aircraft took part in the attack. These included seven B-2 bombers that flew east from continental United States and completed an 18-hour round trip. To avoid detection, the US military used deception manoeuvres early in the mission. Some jets were flown ahead of the bombers to confuse radar systems and clear a path for the main strike team.<h2>When did the strikes happen?</h2>The bombing of all three sites took place between 18:40 and 19:05 Eastern Time. The timing was calculated to maximise surprise, and according to General Caine, Iran’s surface-to-air missile systems did not react. He said the US detected no missile launches or resistance during or after the operation.

The main force behind the operation was the US Air Force’s B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, the only aircraft capable of delivering bombs powerful enough to penetrate Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. 

In a major military operation, the United States bombed three of Iran’s key nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, claiming they were “totally and completely obliterated”. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth dubbed the attack 'Operation Hammer'. After the attack, President Donald Trump took to Truth Social saying that Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely destroyed”. He warned that if Iran retaliated, the US would respond with “force far greater than what was witnessed tonight”. Iran has promised “everlasting consequences” in response to the strikes. The situation remains tense, with US forces in the region on high alert. Also read: 'Every American now a target': US citizens at risk of 'hostage-taking' after Trump strikes Iran’s nuclear sites Here are all the weapons Washington used to hit Iran's fortified and deeply buried nuclear sites What aircraft carried out the strike? The main force behind the operation was the US Air Force’s B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, the only aircraft capable of delivering bombs powerful enough to penetrate Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. According to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, these bombers went into Iranian airspace and came back undetected. He described the operation as the longest B-2 mission since 2001, and the largest B-2 strike in history. Also read: Israel-Iran war: Missiles, proxies or Strait of Hormuz? How Iran might hit back at the US after nuclear site bombings What kind of bombs were used? To break through Iran’s fortified sites, the US used Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs). These are 30,000lb bunker-busting bombs designed to destroy underground targets. General Dan Caine, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, confirmed that 14 MOPs were dropped on two of the three nuclear sites, Fordow and Natanz. This marked the first time these massive bombs were ever used in combat. Did the US use missiles too? As the B-2 bombers targeted Fordow and Natanz, a US submarine-launched more than 24 Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles at the Esfahan nuclear site. The Tomahawk missiles were the last weapons to hit and helped complete the operation without triggering any known Iranian defences. How many aircraft were involved in the operation? General Caine said that more than 125 US aircraft took part in the attack. These included seven B-2 bombers that flew east from continental United States and completed an 18-hour round trip. To avoid detection, the US military used deception manoeuvres early in the mission. Some jets were flown ahead of the bombers to confuse radar systems and clear a path for the main strike team. When did the strikes happen? The bombing of all three sites took place between 18:40 and 19:05 Eastern Time. The timing was calculated to maximise surprise, and according to General Caine, Iran’s surface-to-air missile systems did not react. He said the US detected no missile launches or resistance during or after the operation.

The main force behind the operation was the US Air Force’s B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, the only aircraft capable of delivering bombs powerful enough to penetrate Iran’s underground nuclear facilities.&nbsp;

B-2 Bombers, Bunker busters, Tomahawk missiles: What weapons did US use to 'completely obliterate' Iran’s key nuclear sites?

The Israeli military said that it had conducted airstrikes on at least six airports in western, eastern, and central Iran on Monday and destroyed a refueling plane, and F-14, F-5, and AH-1 aircraft. The Israeli military further said that it had also attacked surface-to-surface missile storage facilities in central Iran, as fighting between the two enemies continued for the 11th day. The army issued a statement saying that over 15 warplanes had targeted the Kermanshah region in northwestern Iran, "neutralising a number of surface-to-surface missile launch and storage sites directed towards Israeli territory".&nbsp;"The IDF continues its efforts to degrade the Iranian Regime's military capabilities and achieve aerial superiority over Iranian airspace in order to protect the State of Israel," the Iranian Defence Forces (IDF) said in a statement on Telegram. In a statement posted on X, the IDF said its precision strikes "damaged runways, underground bunkers, a refuelling plane, and F-14, F-5, and AH-1 aircraft belonging to the Iranian regime." &nbsp;The Israeli army said that the Iranian planes destroyed were meant to be used against Israel. IDF also included a photo with the post listing the airports at Tehran's Mehrabad, Mashhad, and Dezful as among those hit. "The Air Force interrupted the ability to depart from these airports and the functioning of the Iranian army's air force from them," the post said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Israel-Iran war escalates: IDF targets six airports across Iran IDF claims 15 fighter jets and helicopters destroyed<a href="https://twitter.com/BislaDiksha?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BislaDiksha</a> reports <a href="https://t.co/lTV3ikq0n3">pic.twitter.com/lTV3ikq0n3</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1937064099470541097?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Israel struck Iran on June 13 with massive attacks against its missile and nuclear facilities, as well as military commanders and security forces. Air raids flared between the two arch-enemies in the early hours of Monday, while Tehran threatened to retaliate against the American warplanes' weekend bombing of three nuclear facilities with bunker-buster bombs. US President Donald Trump claimed the strike had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program, but other officials indicated it was too early to say how much Tehran's nuclear program had been affected.

WATCH-Israel attacks Iran airfields, destroys F-14 jet, missile storage sites

The Israeli military said that it had conducted airstrikes on at least six airports in western, eastern, and central Iran on Monday and destroyed a refueling plane, and F-14, F-5, and AH-1 aircraft. The Israeli military further said that it had also attacked surface-to-surface missile storage facilities in central Iran, as fighting between the two enemies continued for the 11th day. The army issued a statement saying that over 15 warplanes had targeted the Kermanshah region in northwestern Iran, "neutralising a number of surface-to-surface missile launch and storage sites directed towards Israeli territory". "The IDF continues its efforts to degrade the Iranian Regime's military capabilities and achieve aerial superiority over Iranian airspace in order to protect the State of Israel," the Iranian Defence Forces (IDF) said in a statement on Telegram. In a statement posted on X, the IDF said its precision strikes "damaged runways, underground bunkers, a refuelling plane, and F-14, F-5, and AH-1 aircraft belonging to the Iranian regime." The Israeli army said that the Iranian planes destroyed were meant to be used against Israel. IDF also included a photo with the post listing the airports at Tehran's Mehrabad, Mashhad, and Dezful as among those hit. "The Air Force interrupted the ability to depart from these airports and the functioning of the Iranian army's air force from them," the post said.

The Israeli military said it carried out airstrikes on at least six airports in western, eastern and central Iran on Monday (June 23)

Did you know that China was actively involved in the Iranian nuclear programme, which has faced bombardment by Israel and the US in recent days? China had been helping Iran build its vast nuclear programme for decades. It provided the Islamic Republic with technical, and economic aid to help develop its nuclear capabilities.<h2>The China link to Iran's nuclear programme goes back to 1980s</h2>Since the formation of the Islamic Republic after the revolution of 1979, China has been helping Iran with its nuclear efforts. The help was given in building a research nuclear reactor and supplying at least four additional research reactors. China aided Iran in building a uranium hexafluoride enrichment plant near Isfahan. In theory, this could help Iran produce material for nuclear weapons.<h2>Chinese nuclear technology transfers to Iran</h2>China had given nuclear technology transfers to Iran as recently as 2000s. Note that this was around the time that the Amad Project, the alleged secretive nuclear weapons programme of Iran, was exposed and officially halted. The Amad project started in 1989 and ended in 2003, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/strait-of-hormuz-handles-20-25-of-global-oil-trade-asian-markets-dip-as-gulf-tensions-escalate-1750665399251/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/strait-of-hormuz-handles-20-25-of-global-oil-trade-asian-markets-dip-as-gulf-tensions-escalate-1750665399251/embed</a>&nbsp;Under the Amad Plan, Iran allegedly acquired several foreign weapon designs and refined them to develop its own, according to a report in the Iran Watch website.&nbsp;Iran "conducted conventional explosives testing; carried out casting and machining experiments with surrogate materials; and studied how to integrate the warhead with a Shahab-3 missile," the website claimed in an article. Did these nuclear weapon blueprints have any Chinese links? We will probably never know.Nevertheless, it is fair to say that China's backing in the early days of the Islamic Republic helped it build its nuclear infrastructure.<h2>China and Iran have deep strategic ties</h2>China and Iran have a long-standing strategic relationship, cemented through a 25-year comprehensive cooperation agreement signed in 2021. It should be noted that China is a critical economic lifeline for Iran, as it buys nearly 90 per cent of Iranian oil exports.&nbsp; Many of these exports are carried out through shadow fleets to evade American and Western sanctions on Iran. That trade, according to reports, accounts for some 20 per cent of Iran’s economy. It is fair to assume that this also indirectly finances the Iranian nuclear programme. Note here that China has also supplied missile fuel components and other armaments, enhancing Iran’s military capabilities and helping its ballistic missile development.&nbsp; &nbsp;

China had given nuclear technology transfers to Iran as recently as 2000s. Note that this was around the time that the Amad Project, the alleged secretive nuclear weapons programme of Iran, was exposed and officially halted. 

Did you know that China was actively involved in the Iranian nuclear programme, which has faced bombardment by Israel and the US in recent days? China had been helping Iran build its vast nuclear programme for decades. It provided the Islamic Republic with technical, and economic aid to help develop its nuclear capabilities. The China link to Iran's nuclear programme goes back to 1980s Since the formation of the Islamic Republic after the revolution of 1979, China has been helping Iran with its nuclear efforts. The help was given in building a research nuclear reactor and supplying at least four additional research reactors. China aided Iran in building a uranium hexafluoride enrichment plant near Isfahan. In theory, this could help Iran produce material for nuclear weapons. Chinese nuclear technology transfers to Iran China had given nuclear technology transfers to Iran as recently as 2000s. Note that this was around the time that the Amad Project, the alleged secretive nuclear weapons programme of Iran, was exposed and officially halted. The Amad project started in 1989 and ended in 2003, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. https://www.wionews.com/videos/strait-of-hormuz-handles-20-25-of-global-oil-trade-asian-markets-dip-as-gulf-tensions-escalate-1750665399251/embed Under the Amad Plan, Iran allegedly acquired several foreign weapon designs and refined them to develop its own, according to a report in the Iran Watch website. Iran "conducted conventional explosives testing; carried out casting and machining experiments with surrogate materials; and studied how to integrate the warhead with a Shahab-3 missile," the website claimed in an article. Did these nuclear weapon blueprints have any Chinese links? We will probably never know. Nevertheless, it is fair to say that China's backing in the early days of the Islamic Republic helped it build its nuclear infrastructure. China and Iran have deep strategic ties China and Iran have a long-standing strategic relationship, cemented through a 25-year comprehensive cooperation agreement signed in 2021. It should be noted that China is a critical economic lifeline for Iran, as it buys nearly 90 per cent of Iranian oil exports. Many of these exports are carried out through shadow fleets to evade American and Western sanctions on Iran. That trade, according to reports, accounts for some 20 per cent of Iran’s economy. It is fair to assume that this also indirectly finances the Iranian nuclear programme. Note here that China has also supplied missile fuel components and other armaments, enhancing Iran’s military capabilities and helping its ballistic missile development.

China helped Iran build its vast nuclear programme, all the way up to early 2000s. It provided technical knowhow and economic aid to help the Islamic Republic develop nuclear capabilities.

China hand: Did you know Chinese cooperation in Iranian nuclear programme goes back decades?

Operation Midnight Hammer spared Bushehr: Why didn't the US target the Bushehr plant during its Operation Midnight Hammer on Sunday, targeting Iranian nuclear installations? The first answer would be that the plant is linked to Iran's peaceful nuclear programme, and was possibly not a site worth attacking. But there's something deeper. An attack on the site would have resulted in a Chernobyl-like nuclear disaster. But more significant could be the presence of Russians working in the facility. Here is what you should know about the Bushehr nuclear power plant and its Russian connection.&nbsp;<h2>Warnings of Chernobyl-like disaster</h2>Both global experts and Russian officials had warned of a possibly catastrophic radiological event if Bushehr, built with Russian assistance in the 1970s, was attacked by the US or Israel. They compared the aftermath of a potential strike on Bushehr to the Chernobyl disaster of April 1986. The erstwhile Soviet Union city had to be closed entirely, after fuel leaked from its nuclear facility, leading to explosions, deaths that are still not fully counted, and radiation that continues to this day. Severe environmental and geopolitical consequences would have followed if Bushehr was attacked.<h2>The Russian hand in the Bushehr plant</h2>The Bushehr power plant is a civilian nuclear facility, located on the Gulf Coast of Iran. &nbsp;Over the years, the Russians have been helping Iran build and operate Bushehr.&nbsp;Additional reactors are in the process of being built with Russian assistance, as mentioned by Alexey Likhachev, the head of Russian atomic energy agency Rosatom.<h2>Russia is monitoring Iran nuclear situation</h2>Russia has said in recent days that it was prepared to evacuate Russian personnel if Iranian nuclear facilities are attacked. Bushehr is one such facility, where at least 300 personnel were involved or are/were present.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-strikes-iran-fordow-natanz-and-isfahan-majorly-damaged-after-us-strikes-1750664460572/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-strikes-iran-fordow-natanz-and-isfahan-majorly-damaged-after-us-strikes-1750664460572/embed</a> Amid the ongoing strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, which started with Israel bombings on June 13, and Sunday's US bombings, both countries assured Russia that their workers would not be harmed. Such a harm would be a diplomatic catastrophe, forcing Russia to act, and even possibly intervene, in the current war.<h2>Bushehr nuclear plant was started by the Germans, not Russians</h2>In fact, it is not Russia, but erstwhile West Germany, mainly its company Siemens, which started building the Bushehr nuclear power plant in 1975, during the Pahlavi Shah dynasty era of Iran. But after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the Germans pulled out of the project, and Russia entered the scene, building and operating the plant.&nbsp; Rosatom completed the construction of Bushehr in 2011, with a 1,000-MW reactor.Russia has got contracts for building eight additional reactors for Iran, four of which are at Bushehr.Russia also supplies nuclear fuel to Iran. Once used, the spent fuel is returned to Russia, to prevent proliferation, by Iran.&nbsp;

An attack on Bushehr would have resulted in a Chernobyl-like nuclear disaster. But more significant could be the presence of Russians 

Operation Midnight Hammer spared Bushehr: Why didn't the US target the Bushehr plant during its Operation Midnight Hammer on Sunday, targeting Iranian nuclear installations? The first answer would be that the plant is linked to Iran's peaceful nuclear programme, and was possibly not a site worth attacking. But there's something deeper. An attack on the site would have resulted in a Chernobyl-like nuclear disaster. But more significant could be the presence of Russians working in the facility. Here is what you should know about the Bushehr nuclear power plant and its Russian connection. Warnings of Chernobyl-like disaster Both global experts and Russian officials had warned of a possibly catastrophic radiological event if Bushehr, built with Russian assistance in the 1970s, was attacked by the US or Israel. They compared the aftermath of a potential strike on Bushehr to the Chernobyl disaster of April 1986. The erstwhile Soviet Union city had to be closed entirely, after fuel leaked from its nuclear facility, leading to explosions, deaths that are still not fully counted, and radiation that continues to this day. Severe environmental and geopolitical consequences would have followed if Bushehr was attacked. The Russian hand in the Bushehr plant The Bushehr power plant is a civilian nuclear facility, located on the Gulf Coast of Iran. Over the years, the Russians have been helping Iran build and operate Bushehr. Additional reactors are in the process of being built with Russian assistance, as mentioned by Alexey Likhachev, the head of Russian atomic energy agency Rosatom. Russia is monitoring Iran nuclear situation Russia has said in recent days that it was prepared to evacuate Russian personnel if Iranian nuclear facilities are attacked. Bushehr is one such facility, where at least 300 personnel were involved or are/were present. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-strikes-iran-fordow-natanz-and-isfahan-majorly-damaged-after-us-strikes-1750664460572/embed Amid the ongoing strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, which started with Israel bombings on June 13, and Sunday's US bombings, both countries assured Russia that their workers would not be harmed. Such a harm would be a diplomatic catastrophe, forcing Russia to act, and even possibly intervene, in the current war. Bushehr nuclear plant was started by the Germans, not Russians In fact, it is not Russia, but erstwhile West Germany, mainly its company Siemens, which started building the Bushehr nuclear power plant in 1975, during the Pahlavi Shah dynasty era of Iran. But after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the Germans pulled out of the project, and Russia entered the scene, building and operating the plant. Rosatom completed the construction of Bushehr in 2011, with a 1,000-MW reactor. Russia has got contracts for building eight additional reactors for Iran, four of which are at Bushehr. Russia also supplies nuclear fuel to Iran. Once used, the spent fuel is returned to Russia, to prevent proliferation, by Iran.

An attack on the site would have resulted in a Chernobyl-like nuclear disaster. But more significant could be the presence of Russians working in the civilian facility.&nbsp;

‘Chernobyl disaster’ fears, or presence of Russians? Why didn't the US attack Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant in Operation Midnight Hammer?

France police have detained 12 suspects after 145 people were targeted in "syringe attacks". On Saturday (Jun 21), millions of people took to the streets in the evening to participate in this year's 'Fête de la Musique,' with authorities reporting "unprecedented crowds" in Paris. However, this year's beloved annual street music festival turned unsettling after dozens of festival goers reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public spaces. This has prompted a nationwide investigation and a wave of arrests. Here's what we know so far about the "syringe attacks".<h2>What happened?</h2>According to French authorities, 145 people across the country said they were stabbed or pricked with needles during Saturday night's festivities.The Fête de la Musique draws millions into the streets each June to celebrate live music. This year, officials reported a sharp spike in disturbing reports from attendees.The victims of these "syringe attacks" included both men and women. In Paris, at least 13 cases were recorded, including a 15-year-old girl and an 18-year-old man who reported feeling unwell after being stabbed in separate incidents.<h2>Were drugs involved?</h2>At this stage, officials haven’t confirmed whether the syringe attacks involved date drugs or substances like GHB or Rohypnol — used by predators to incapacitate and rape victims.Some individuals were taken to the hospital for toxicology tests, said the interior ministry, but no public toxicology results had been released at the time this report was published.As per AFP, ahead of the festival, social media posts had circulated calling for women to be targeted, which hints at the possibility that at least some attacks may have been premeditated.<h2>Who was arrested?</h2>So far, twelve people have been arrested across France in connection with the attacks. Among them, four suspects in Angoulême — a city in the southwest — are believed to have targeted around 50 victims, reports AFP citing police sources.Outside of the syringe-related cases, more than 370 people were arrested nationwide during the festival for various offences, including nearly 90 people in Paris.<h2>Was anyone seriously hurt?</h2>None of the victims of the "syringe attacks" are being reported as being seriously hurt. &nbsp;However, outside of that, 14 people were seriously injured during the night's celebrations.&nbsp; One of the most concerning cases involved a 17-year-old who was found on the street with stab wounds to the lower abdomen and was hospitalised.Thirteen police officers were also injured during crowd control and other incidents. Still, despite the disturbing reports, the Paris police prefect Laurent Nunez said that "no major incident has been reported". &nbsp;

In France, this year's beloved annual street music festival turned unsettling after dozens of festival goers reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public spaces. Here's what we know so far about the "syringe attacks".

France police have detained 12 suspects after 145 people were targeted in "syringe attacks". On Saturday (Jun 21), millions of people took to the streets in the evening to participate in this year's 'Fête de la Musique,' with authorities reporting "unprecedented crowds" in Paris. However, this year's beloved annual street music festival turned unsettling after dozens of festival goers reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public spaces. This has prompted a nationwide investigation and a wave of arrests. Here's what we know so far about the "syringe attacks". What happened? According to French authorities, 145 people across the country said they were stabbed or pricked with needles during Saturday night's festivities. The Fête de la Musique draws millions into the streets each June to celebrate live music. This year, officials reported a sharp spike in disturbing reports from attendees. The victims of these "syringe attacks" included both men and women. In Paris, at least 13 cases were recorded, including a 15-year-old girl and an 18-year-old man who reported feeling unwell after being stabbed in separate incidents. Were drugs involved? At this stage, officials haven’t confirmed whether the syringe attacks involved date drugs or substances like GHB or Rohypnol — used by predators to incapacitate and rape victims. Some individuals were taken to the hospital for toxicology tests, said the interior ministry, but no public toxicology results had been released at the time this report was published. As per AFP, ahead of the festival, social media posts had circulated calling for women to be targeted, which hints at the possibility that at least some attacks may have been premeditated. Who was arrested? So far, twelve people have been arrested across France in connection with the attacks. Among them, four suspects in Angoulême — a city in the southwest — are believed to have targeted around 50 victims, reports AFP citing police sources. Outside of the syringe-related cases, more than 370 people were arrested nationwide during the festival for various offences, including nearly 90 people in Paris. Was anyone seriously hurt? None of the victims of the "syringe attacks" are being reported as being seriously hurt. However, outside of that, 14 people were seriously injured during the night's celebrations. One of the most concerning cases involved a 17-year-old who was found on the street with stab wounds to the lower abdomen and was hospitalised. Thirteen police officers were also injured during crowd control and other incidents. Still, despite the disturbing reports, the Paris police prefect Laurent Nunez said that "no major incident has been reported".

In France, this year's beloved annual street music festival turned unsettling after dozens of festival goers reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public spaces. Here's what we know so far about the "syringe attacks".

Explained: What's with the 'syringe attacks' on public in France?

Iran on Sunday (June 23) threatened US military bases for launching attacks against the nation's nuclear facilities, saying such bases would be legitimate targets. US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The US has thousands of troops stationed on bases throughout the Middle East. Let's take a look at nations with significant deployments of US troops in the Middle East, which come under the US military's Central Command (CENTCOM).<h2>Bahrain</h2>The small Gulf state is home to a facility called Naval Support Activity Bahrain, where the US Navy's Fifth Fleet and headquarters of US Naval Forces Central Command are stationed. The country's deepwater port is capable of hosting the largest US warships, including aircraft carriers, and the base has been used by the US Navy since 1948, when the facility was run by Britain's Royal Navy.&nbsp;There are various US vessels that use Bahrain as their home port, such as four mine countermeasures and two logistics support ships. The US Coast Guard also has some vessels present in the country, consisting of six fast response cutters.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-bases-on-alert-as-iran-backed-militias-prepare-for-potential-retaliation-report-1750654417149">US bases in Iraq on alert as intel hints at potential retaliation by Iran-backed militias: Report</a><h2>Iraq</h2>The United States has troops stationed at several installations in Iraq, such as the Al-Asad and Arbil air bases. Baghdad is an ally of Iran, but also a strategic ally of Tehran's bitter rival the United States. As per reports, there are approximately 2,500 American soldiers in Iraq as part of the global coalition fighting the Islamic State jihadist organisation. Baghdad and Washington have agreed to schedule the phasing out of the forces of the coalition from Iraq.&nbsp;US troops in Syria and Iraq were targeted repeatedly by pro-Iran extremists after the Gaza war broke out in October 2023, but retaliated with punishing attacks on Tehran-aligned targets, and the attacks mostly ceased.<h2>Kuwait</h2>Kuwait has multiple US bases, such as Camp Arifjan, where the forward headquarters for the US Army element of CENTCOM is located. The US Army also prepositions materiel in the country. Ali al-Salem Air Base is home to the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military terms as the "primary airlift hub and gateway for delivering combat power to joint and coalition forces" in the theater. Furthermore, the United States operates drones such as MQ-9 Reapers in Kuwait.<h2>Qatar</h2>Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar features the forward elements of CENTCOM, as well as of its airmen and special ops men in the area. It also accommodates rotating combat aircraft, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military claims consists of "airlift, aerial refueling intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and aeromedical evacuation assets."<h2>Syria</h2>The United States has had troop presences for years at a chain of bases in Syria as part of the international campaign against the Islamic State group, which emerged from Syria's civil war to capture vast swaths of Syria and neighboring Iraq. The Pentagon revealed in April that it would cut approximately in half its troops in the nation to under 1,000 in the next few months as part of a "consolidation" of US forces in the nation.<h2>United Arab Emirates</h2>The US 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, a force that consists of 10 aircraft squadrons and also has UAVs like MQ-9 Reapers, is headquartered at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE. Fighting aircraft have cycled through Al Dhafra, which also has the Gulf Air Warfare Center for air and missile defense training.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Arab governments sounded alarm on Sunday following the US attacks on three Iranian nuclear facilities overnight, and they called for immediate de-escalation amid concerns of being battlegrounds in an rising confrontation.&nbsp;Persian Gulf nations like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, who may have previously hailed the destruction of Iran's nuclear program by military means, instead condemned the American interference. Saudi Arabia condemned the infringement of Iran's sovereignty, and the UAE voiced “deep concern.” Governments from the area requested increased efforts at brokering an end to the fighting before the region becomes lost in "the horrors and dangers of war," Bahrain warned. And Oman, a seasoned diplomatic middleman between Iran and the United States, said, "The measures taken by the United States risk broadening the conflict's scope and involve a grave breach of international law."

Are these US bases sitting ducks for Iran? Military assets on high alert after Trump strike

Iran on Sunday (June 23) threatened US military bases for launching attacks against the nation's nuclear facilities, saying such bases would be legitimate targets. US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The US has thousands of troops stationed on bases throughout the Middle East. Let's take a look at nations with significant deployments of US troops in the Middle East, which come under the US military's Central Command (CENTCOM). Bahrain The small Gulf state is home to a facility called Naval Support Activity Bahrain, where the US Navy's Fifth Fleet and headquarters of US Naval Forces Central Command are stationed. The country's deepwater port is capable of hosting the largest US warships, including aircraft carriers, and the base has been used by the US Navy since 1948, when the facility was run by Britain's Royal Navy. There are various US vessels that use Bahrain as their home port, such as four mine countermeasures and two logistics support ships. The US Coast Guard also has some vessels present in the country, consisting of six fast response cutters. Also Read: US bases in Iraq on alert as intel hints at potential retaliation by Iran-backed militias: Report Iraq The United States has troops stationed at several installations in Iraq, such as the Al-Asad and Arbil air bases. Baghdad is an ally of Iran, but also a strategic ally of Tehran's bitter rival the United States. As per reports, there are approximately 2,500 American soldiers in Iraq as part of the global coalition fighting the Islamic State jihadist organisation. Baghdad and Washington have agreed to schedule the phasing out of the forces of the coalition from Iraq. US troops in Syria and Iraq were targeted repeatedly by pro-Iran extremists after the Gaza war broke out in October 2023, but retaliated with punishing attacks on Tehran-aligned targets, and the attacks mostly ceased. Kuwait Kuwait has multiple US bases, such as Camp Arifjan, where the forward headquarters for the US Army element of CENTCOM is located. The US Army also prepositions materiel in the country. Ali al-Salem Air Base is home to the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military terms as the "primary airlift hub and gateway for delivering combat power to joint and coalition forces" in the theater. Furthermore, the United States operates drones such as MQ-9 Reapers in Kuwait. Qatar Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar features the forward elements of CENTCOM, as well as of its airmen and special ops men in the area. It also accommodates rotating combat aircraft, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military claims consists of "airlift, aerial refueling intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and aeromedical evacuation assets." Syria The United States has had troop presences for years at a chain of bases in Syria as part of the international campaign against the Islamic State group, which emerged from Syria's civil war to capture vast swaths of Syria and neighboring Iraq. The Pentagon revealed in April that it would cut approximately in half its troops in the nation to under 1,000 in the next few months as part of a "consolidation" of US forces in the nation. United Arab Emirates The US 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, a force that consists of 10 aircraft squadrons and also has UAVs like MQ-9 Reapers, is headquartered at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE. Fighting aircraft have cycled through Al Dhafra, which also has the Gulf Air Warfare Center for air and missile defense training. Meanwhile, Arab governments sounded alarm on Sunday following the US attacks on three Iranian nuclear facilities overnight, and they called for immediate de-escalation amid concerns of being battlegrounds in an rising confrontation. Persian Gulf nations like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, who may have previously hailed the destruction of Iran's nuclear program by military means, instead condemned the American interference. Saudi Arabia condemned the infringement of Iran's sovereignty, and the UAE voiced “deep concern.” Governments from the area requested increased efforts at brokering an end to the fighting before the region becomes lost in "the horrors and dangers of war," Bahrain warned. And Oman, a seasoned diplomatic middleman between Iran and the United States, said, "The measures taken by the United States risk broadening the conflict's scope and involve a grave breach of international law."

After US B-2 stealth bombers hit Iran’s key nuclear sites, Tehran has vowed retaliation

Whereabouts of Iran's 60 per cent enriched uranium: Where is Iran's near-weapons grade uranium, enriched up to 60 per cent, close to the 90 per cent required to build nuclear bombs? This question is lingering a day after the US claimed to have struck key Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday (June 22). Iran is thought to possess up to 400 kg of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent. Conflicting reports are emerging on the status of this material, which could be dangerous, and could help Iran resume its programme when the dust settles. Here is what we know about the current status of Iranian nuclear material.<h2>Did trucks remove Iranian nuclear material?</h2>That would appear to be the case if one goes by some Western media reports. The Newsweek, for instance, reported on satellite images that allegedly showed trucks in motion in the areas attacked by the US, much ahead of the bombings. The report claimed that 16 cargo trucks were spotted near a road to the Fordow nuclear site's tunnel entrance on June 19, way before the US attacks. &nbsp;Citing the satellite imaging company Maxar, it said most of these trucks moved a kilometre northwest of the access road by June 20. The same day, new trucks and bulldozers appeared close to the main entrance. One truck, Maxar said, was very near the main tunnel entrance.<h2>Iran claims nuclear sites were evacuated, Israel has ‘interesting intel’</h2>The truck movement reports came amid Iranian claims that the nuclear material had been moved ahead of the US bombing. The state media reports claimed that the enriched uranium had been moved to a ‘safe location’.&nbsp; Amid continuing speculation, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated that Israel has ‘interesting intel’ on the Iranian nuclear material. Israeli media outlets like the Times of Israel reported, citing Bibi, that Israel knows the ‘whereabouts of Iran’s 400 kg of 60 per cent enriched uranium’. He did not go into details.<h2>But wait, was the nuclear material not in Fordow?</h2>Fordow, the under-mountain site believed to host a uranium enrichment plant, was the main target of the US strike. Satellite images showed some holes after the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs, formally known as Massive Ordnance Penetrators, hit the site.&nbsp;But according to a New York Times report, the 60 per cent enriched uranium was not in Fordow. It was stored somewhere deep in the nuclear site of Isfahan. These are kept in small casks that can fit in trunks of around 10 cars, &nbsp;it said. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/operation-midnight-hammer-pentagon-calls-it-largest-b-2-operational-strike-in-u-s-history-1750659063331/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/operation-midnight-hammer-pentagon-calls-it-largest-b-2-operational-strike-in-u-s-history-1750659063331/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;UN nuclear watchdog IAEAs' chief Rafael Grossi said on CNN on Sunday that “Iran has made no secret that they have protected this material.” And he answered in the affirmative when asked by NYT if the stockpile has been removed.<h2>US officials are still clueless about Iran's enriched uranium stockpile</h2>As per the NYT report, US officials have 'conceded' they do not know where Iran's nuclear stockpile is. The report noted that US Vice President JD Vance and IAEA's Grossi have both acknowledged this.&nbsp;Vance told the news channel ABC that the US, in the coming weeks, will "do something with that fuel. This contravenes US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's claims, amplifying Trump's remarks that the US bunker-busting bombs “completely and totally obliterated” Iranian nuclear programme.<h2>What did US really achieve with the Operation Midnight Hammer strike on Iran?</h2>So, was it ‘mission unaccomplished’ for the US, despite President Donald Trump's claims that the weekend strikes under Operation Midnight Hammer ‘obliterated’ the Iranian nuclear programme? &nbsp; &nbsp;US and Israeli analysis is that the Fordow site was seriously damaged but not completely destroyed. In fact, Hegseth, as well as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, were not as hyperbolic as Trump. In remarks on Sunday, they said "severe damage and destruction" was caused by the US attacks that used B2 bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeting three nuclear sites, possibly in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.<h2>How dangerous is the 60 per cent enriched uranium with Iran?</h2>Technically, 60 per cent uranium is near-bomb grade, and can create up to 10 atomic weapons of some impact. More than that, as noted in the NYT report, this stockpile could become a bargaining chip for Iran in future negotiations on its nuclear programme. Note that Iran has made it very clear that it will not agree to zero uranium enrichment.&nbsp;And, with the threat of Iran exiting the Non-Proliferation Treaty, it might even free the country from obligations not to develop a nuclear weapon.

The truck movement reports came amid Iranian claims that the nuclear material had been moved ahead of the US bombing. The state media reports claimed that the enriched uranium had been moved to a ‘safe location’. 

Whereabouts of Iran's 60 per cent enriched uranium: Where is Iran's near-weapons grade uranium, enriched up to 60 per cent, close to the 90 per cent required to build nuclear bombs? This question is lingering a day after the US claimed to have struck key Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday (June 22). Iran is thought to possess up to 400 kg of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent. Conflicting reports are emerging on the status of this material, which could be dangerous, and could help Iran resume its programme when the dust settles. Here is what we know about the current status of Iranian nuclear material. Did trucks remove Iranian nuclear material? That would appear to be the case if one goes by some Western media reports. The Newsweek, for instance, reported on satellite images that allegedly showed trucks in motion in the areas attacked by the US, much ahead of the bombings. The report claimed that 16 cargo trucks were spotted near a road to the Fordow nuclear site's tunnel entrance on June 19, way before the US attacks. Citing the satellite imaging company Maxar, it said most of these trucks moved a kilometre northwest of the access road by June 20. The same day, new trucks and bulldozers appeared close to the main entrance. One truck, Maxar said, was very near the main tunnel entrance. Iran claims nuclear sites were evacuated, Israel has ‘interesting intel’ The truck movement reports came amid Iranian claims that the nuclear material had been moved ahead of the US bombing. The state media reports claimed that the enriched uranium had been moved to a ‘safe location’. Amid continuing speculation, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated that Israel has ‘interesting intel’ on the Iranian nuclear material. Israeli media outlets like the Times of Israel reported, citing Bibi, that Israel knows the ‘whereabouts of Iran’s 400 kg of 60 per cent enriched uranium’. He did not go into details. But wait, was the nuclear material not in Fordow? Fordow, the under-mountain site believed to host a uranium enrichment plant, was the main target of the US strike. Satellite images showed some holes after the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs, formally known as Massive Ordnance Penetrators, hit the site. But according to a New York Times report, the 60 per cent enriched uranium was not in Fordow. It was stored somewhere deep in the nuclear site of Isfahan. These are kept in small casks that can fit in trunks of around 10 cars, it said. https://www.wionews.com/videos/operation-midnight-hammer-pentagon-calls-it-largest-b-2-operational-strike-in-u-s-history-1750659063331/embed UN nuclear watchdog IAEAs' chief Rafael Grossi said on CNN on Sunday that “Iran has made no secret that they have protected this material.” And he answered in the affirmative when asked by NYT if the stockpile has been removed. US officials are still clueless about Iran's enriched uranium stockpile As per the NYT report, US officials have 'conceded' they do not know where Iran's nuclear stockpile is. The report noted that US Vice President JD Vance and IAEA's Grossi have both acknowledged this. Vance told the news channel ABC that the US, in the coming weeks, will "do something with that fuel. This contravenes US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's claims, amplifying Trump's remarks that the US bunker-busting bombs “completely and totally obliterated” Iranian nuclear programme. What did US really achieve with the Operation Midnight Hammer strike on Iran? So, was it ‘mission unaccomplished’ for the US, despite President Donald Trump's claims that the weekend strikes under Operation Midnight Hammer ‘obliterated’ the Iranian nuclear programme? US and Israeli analysis is that the Fordow site was seriously damaged but not completely destroyed. In fact, Hegseth, as well as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, were not as hyperbolic as Trump. In remarks on Sunday, they said "severe damage and destruction" was caused by the US attacks that used B2 bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeting three nuclear sites, possibly in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. How dangerous is the 60 per cent enriched uranium with Iran? Technically, 60 per cent uranium is near-bomb grade, and can create up to 10 atomic weapons of some impact. More than that, as noted in the NYT report, this stockpile could become a bargaining chip for Iran in future negotiations on its nuclear programme. Note that Iran has made it very clear that it will not agree to zero uranium enrichment. And, with the threat of Iran exiting the Non-Proliferation Treaty, it might even free the country from obligations not to develop a nuclear weapon.

Technically, 60 per cent uranium is near-bomb grade, and can create up to 10 atomic weapons of some impact.

Where is Iran's near-bomb-grade uranium? Tehran says removed, Israel claims has ‘intel’, US clueless after bombing sites

One person was injured and the suspected gunman was shot dead during a shooting at Crosspoint Community Church in Wayne, Michigan, on Sunday (local time), the New York Times reported, citing the city police.&nbsp;According to the Wayne Police Department, the officials responded to reports of gunfire at the church, located roughly 25 miles west of Detroit and upon arrival, they found that a security guard had shot and killed the suspect, the NYT reported. The injured person, who was the security guard at the church, sustained a gunshot wound to the leg, the police confirmed.&nbsp;The church's Senior Pastor Bobby Kelly Jr. stated that a churchgoer hit the shooter with a truck, running him over with the vehicle, allowing the security guard time to shoot the gunman, the NYT reported, citing The Detroit News.&nbsp;Pastor Kelly added that no other congregants were harmed during the incident, which occurred during a vacation Bible school event attended by about 150 people, as reported by the NYT.&nbsp;A livestream of the church service, which was taken down since the attack, showed a lakeside-themed stage and captured a scene where approximately 20 attendees, including numerous children, were present when shouting erupted, prompting people to duck for cover and flee, the NYT reported. People were also seen shielding and carrying children away from the camera's view. More details are awaited.&nbsp;

The church's Senior Pastor Bobby Kelly Jr. stated that a churchgoer hit the shooter with a truck, running him over with the vehicle, allowing the security guard time to shoot the gunman.

One person was injured and the suspected gunman was shot dead during a shooting at Crosspoint Community Church in Wayne, Michigan, on Sunday (local time), the New York Times reported, citing the city police. According to the Wayne Police Department, the officials responded to reports of gunfire at the church, located roughly 25 miles west of Detroit and upon arrival, they found that a security guard had shot and killed the suspect, the NYT reported. The injured person, who was the security guard at the church, sustained a gunshot wound to the leg, the police confirmed. The church's Senior Pastor Bobby Kelly Jr. stated that a churchgoer hit the shooter with a truck, running him over with the vehicle, allowing the security guard time to shoot the gunman, the NYT reported, citing The Detroit News. Pastor Kelly added that no other congregants were harmed during the incident, which occurred during a vacation Bible school event attended by about 150 people, as reported by the NYT. A livestream of the church service, which was taken down since the attack, showed a lakeside-themed stage and captured a scene where approximately 20 attendees, including numerous children, were present when shouting erupted, prompting people to duck for cover and flee, the NYT reported. People were also seen shielding and carrying children away from the camera's view. More details are awaited.

The church's Senior Pastor Bobby Kelly Jr. stated that a churchgoer hit the shooter with a truck, running him over with the vehicle, allowing the security guard time to shoot the gunman.

Michigan church shooting: Attacker killed after firing during Bible school

Pope Leo XIV has issued a stark message about the growing influence of artificial intelligence, especially on the minds of children and young people. On Friday (Jun 20), the newly elected head of the Catholic Church warned that AI could damage young people's grip on reality. In a written message to researchers and policymakers gathered at the Rome Conference on AI, the American-born pontiff, a trained mathematician noted that, "All of us... are concerned for children and young people, and the possible consequences of the use of AI on their intellectual and neurological development."A generation facing information overloadPope Leo voiced concern that AI, with its infinite scroll of pre-packaged answers and simulations, risks damaging young people's ability to perceive reality, to think, to create."No generation has ever had such quick access to the amount of information now available through AI," he said."But again, access to data – however extensive – must not be confused with intelligence," Leo told the annual conference.<h2>'Soulless machines' and synthetic popes</h2>Since becoming pope on May 8, Leo has emerged as one of the world's most vocal critics of AI's unchecked rise — even as deepfake videos of him swirl across TikTok and YouTube, impersonating his voice and image.The pontiff said that attention was needed to protect "healthy, fair and sound lifestyles, especially for the good of younger generations."In another appearance on Saturday (Jun 21) Leo addressed 68 national delegations, including Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. There, he doubled down on his earlier message and stressed that AI must remain a tool for humans — not their replacement.Noting that AI's "static memory" was of no match to the "creative, dynamic" power of human memory," he said "Our personal life has greater value than any algorithm, and social relationships require spaces for development that far transcend the limited patterns that any soulless machine can pre-package."

Pope Leo voiced concern that AI, with its infinite scroll of pre-packaged answers and simulations, risks damaging young people's ability to perceive reality, to think, to create.

Pope Leo XIV has issued a stark message about the growing influence of artificial intelligence, especially on the minds of children and young people. On Friday (Jun 20), the newly elected head of the Catholic Church warned that AI could damage young people's grip on reality. In a written message to researchers and policymakers gathered at the Rome Conference on AI, the American-born pontiff, a trained mathematician noted that, "All of us... are concerned for children and young people, and the possible consequences of the use of AI on their intellectual and neurological development." A generation facing information overload Pope Leo voiced concern that AI, with its infinite scroll of pre-packaged answers and simulations, risks damaging young people's ability to perceive reality, to think, to create. "No generation has ever had such quick access to the amount of information now available through AI," he said. "But again, access to data – however extensive – must not be confused with intelligence," Leo told the annual conference. 'Soulless machines' and synthetic popes Since becoming pope on May 8, Leo has emerged as one of the world's most vocal critics of AI's unchecked rise — even as deepfake videos of him swirl across TikTok and YouTube, impersonating his voice and image. The pontiff said that attention was needed to protect "healthy, fair and sound lifestyles, especially for the good of younger generations." In another appearance on Saturday (Jun 21) Leo addressed 68 national delegations, including Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. There, he doubled down on his earlier message and stressed that AI must remain a tool for humans — not their replacement. Noting that AI's "static memory" was of no match to the "creative, dynamic" power of human memory," he said "Our personal life has greater value than any algorithm, and social relationships require spaces for development that far transcend the limited patterns that any soulless machine can pre-package."

Pope Leo voiced concern that AI, with its infinite scroll of pre-packaged answers and simulations, risks damaging young people's ability to perceive reality, to think, to create.

'Soulless machines...not to replace us’: Pope Leo XIV warns AI may harm young minds, blur reality

The United States on Saturday (Jun 21) officially entered the war in the Middle East as it bombed three nuclear sites inside Iran. Taking to his Truth Social profile, US President Donald Trump announced the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. He said that a "full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow". As per reports, this dramatic escalation of the Israel-Iran war was done by Trump without authorisation from the US Congress and the Pentagon. But did he have the authority to do so? Or did Trump overreach his authority as the POTUS?&nbsp;The US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities—ordered by President Donald Trump—have ignited a constitutional firestorm in Washington. The operation, called as 'Midnight Hammer', was executed with surgical precision but has left behind a trail of political and legal fallout. While some Republicans lauded the move as a bold show of strength, many Democrats—and even a few conservatives—are sounding the alarm, calling the strikes “unconstitutional,” “unauthorised,” and potentially “impeachable.”&nbsp;As questions mount over the legality of Trump’s actions, so do concerns over their long-term consequences. Did Trump overstep his constitutional bounds? Was Congress bypassed? And what precedent does this set for future presidents?&nbsp;Here’s a deep dive into the legality, authority, and political reverberations of Trump’s latest move against Iran—and what it means for American democracy and global stability.<h2>Did Trump overstep his authority?</h2>At the heart of the controversy lies a foundational question: who in the US government has the power to declare war?&nbsp;The US Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war (Article I), while the President, as Commander-in-Chief (Article II), can direct military operations. This delicate balance has often been tested—and Trump’s recent Iran strike has pushed it to the brink.&nbsp;As per the US Constitution, the President of the United States, be it Trump or another, must go to Congress before declaring war on any nation. As per Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution, “[The Congress shall have Power …] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water…” However, it must be noted that the US Congress has not declared war in over 80 years – since World War II. Yet, the US has been part of many wars, including the Afghanistan War, officially known as Operation Enduring Freedom, which happens to be the longest war in US history (from 2001 to 2021).&nbsp;Progressive Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Ro Khanna, have accused Trump of violating both the War Powers Resolution and the Constitution by failing to obtain Congressional approval before launching the strikes. “We need to vote on a War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless war,” Khanna said. Ocasio-Cortez went further, calling the move “grounds for impeachment.”&nbsp;Even some Republicans expressed concern. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a known constitutional conservative, declared bluntly: “This is not Constitutional.” Trump’s defenders argue that the President acted within his authority to protect national security. The White House later said it had made “bipartisan courtesy calls” before the operation, but it’s clear no formal consultation or approval from Congress took place before the missiles launched.<h2>Presidential authority &amp; historical precedents</h2>Presidents have long taken military action without prior Congressional approval—often citing urgent threats or previous authorisations. From Clinton’s airstrikes in Kosovo to Obama’s intervention in Libya and Trump’s own 2020 strike on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, there is precedent for limited military actions conducted under executive authority.&nbsp;Trump’s supporters, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, argue that “the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.” Others point out that the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief does allow for defensive measures without a declaration of war.&nbsp;But critics counter that the latest strike was not reactive or time-sensitive in the way previous emergency actions have been. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), a long-time advocate for reining in presidential war powers, labeled the operation “horrible judgment” and vowed to push for a War Powers Resolution to curtail further hostilities.&nbsp;The broader concern is the erosion of Congressional oversight. If presidents continue acting unilaterally, critics warn, the legislative branch may become a mere spectator in matters of war and peace.<h2>Republicans rally, Democrats rebuke</h2>Among Republicans, the response has largely been supportive. Sen. Lindsey Graham called the strike “the right call,” while Rep. Mike Lawler praised it for neutralising the nuclear threat without declaring war. Former Trump officials and conservative think tanks framed the move as necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran.&nbsp;However, the party isn’t monolithic. Isolationist voices like Rep. Massie questioned not just the constitutionality but the strategic wisdom of escalating conflict in the Middle East—especially when Trump's base had long opposed “forever wars.”&nbsp;Meanwhile, Democrats, particularly progressives, have taken a sharply critical stance. Rep. Sean Casten (IL) and Sen. Bernie Sanders both labeled the action “grossly unconstitutional.” Casten even called it “an unambiguous impeachable offense.” DNC Chair Ken Martin added, “Americans overwhelmingly do not want to go to war. This is reckless.”&nbsp;Interestingly, not all Democrats toed the same line. Sen. John Fetterman, known for his centrist pragmatism, said he supported the strike because “Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear capabilities.” This shows how concerns over Iran’s ambitions cross party lines, even if agreement on Trump’s method is lacking.<h2>Global and domestic consequences</h2>The most immediate concern is regional escalation. Iran has vowed to retaliate, calling the strikes “criminal” and warning of “everlasting consequences.” The attack could reignite hostilities across the Middle East, where US forces remain vulnerable, and tensions with Iran-backed militias are already high.&nbsp;Observers fear that a tit-for-tat spiral could destabilise the entire region—from the Strait of Hormuz to the Golan Heights. With Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria already embroiled in conflict, the addition of a direct US-Iran confrontation could prove catastrophic.<h2>Diplomatic fallout</h2>The strikes all but obliterate hopes of a diplomatic thaw with Iran. Trust, already frayed since Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, is now likely beyond repair. Any backchannel or formal negotiations around nuclear containment are off the table for the foreseeable future.&nbsp;Domestically, the strikes could boomerang. Public opinion has shifted against military adventurism, and any US casualties or drawn-out confrontation could sour voters. Already, Congressional Democrats are preparing legal challenges and legislative remedies. Sen. Kaine and Rep. Khanna have introduced measures to curtail Trump’s war-making powers, setting the stage for a renewed debate on the War Powers Resolution.&nbsp;Most crucially, the strikes may set a precedent. If Congress fails to push back, future presidents—regardless of party—may feel emboldened to bypass legislative oversight in matters of war.<h2>A defining moment</h2>Trump’s decision to strike Iran has reawakened a fundamental constitutional question: where does presidential authority end, and Congressional oversight begin?&nbsp;This moment may prove pivotal—not just for Trump, but for American democracy itself. The legal and political battles playing out in Washington will shape how war powers are exercised, contested, and understood for years to come. Whether Trump’s actions are ultimately vindicated or condemned, they have already triggered a reckoning—one that will define the limits of presidential power in an era of high-stakes global conflict.

Trump ordered the shot on Iran but can he really declare war What the law says as Dems and even GOP oppose another stupid war

The United States on Saturday (Jun 21) officially entered the war in the Middle East as it bombed three nuclear sites inside Iran. Taking to his Truth Social profile, US President Donald Trump announced the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. He said that a "full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow". As per reports, this dramatic escalation of the Israel-Iran war was done by Trump without authorisation from the US Congress and the Pentagon. But did he have the authority to do so? Or did Trump overreach his authority as the POTUS? The US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities—ordered by President Donald Trump—have ignited a constitutional firestorm in Washington. The operation, called as 'Midnight Hammer', was executed with surgical precision but has left behind a trail of political and legal fallout. While some Republicans lauded the move as a bold show of strength, many Democrats—and even a few conservatives—are sounding the alarm, calling the strikes “unconstitutional,” “unauthorised,” and potentially “impeachable.” As questions mount over the legality of Trump’s actions, so do concerns over their long-term consequences. Did Trump overstep his constitutional bounds? Was Congress bypassed? And what precedent does this set for future presidents? Here’s a deep dive into the legality, authority, and political reverberations of Trump’s latest move against Iran—and what it means for American democracy and global stability. Did Trump overstep his authority? At the heart of the controversy lies a foundational question: who in the US government has the power to declare war? The US Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war (Article I), while the President, as Commander-in-Chief (Article II), can direct military operations. This delicate balance has often been tested—and Trump’s recent Iran strike has pushed it to the brink. As per the US Constitution, the President of the United States, be it Trump or another, must go to Congress before declaring war on any nation. As per Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution, “[The Congress shall have Power …] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water…” However, it must be noted that the US Congress has not declared war in over 80 years – since World War II. Yet, the US has been part of many wars, including the Afghanistan War, officially known as Operation Enduring Freedom, which happens to be the longest war in US history (from 2001 to 2021). Progressive Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Ro Khanna, have accused Trump of violating both the War Powers Resolution and the Constitution by failing to obtain Congressional approval before launching the strikes. “We need to vote on a War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless war,” Khanna said. Ocasio-Cortez went further, calling the move “grounds for impeachment.” Even some Republicans expressed concern. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a known constitutional conservative, declared bluntly: “This is not Constitutional.” Trump’s defenders argue that the President acted within his authority to protect national security. The White House later said it had made “bipartisan courtesy calls” before the operation, but it’s clear no formal consultation or approval from Congress took place before the missiles launched. Presidential authority & historical precedents Presidents have long taken military action without prior Congressional approval—often citing urgent threats or previous authorisations. From Clinton’s airstrikes in Kosovo to Obama’s intervention in Libya and Trump’s own 2020 strike on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, there is precedent for limited military actions conducted under executive authority. Trump’s supporters, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, argue that “the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.” Others point out that the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief does allow for defensive measures without a declaration of war. But critics counter that the latest strike was not reactive or time-sensitive in the way previous emergency actions have been. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), a long-time advocate for reining in presidential war powers, labeled the operation “horrible judgment” and vowed to push for a War Powers Resolution to curtail further hostilities. The broader concern is the erosion of Congressional oversight. If presidents continue acting unilaterally, critics warn, the legislative branch may become a mere spectator in matters of war and peace. Republicans rally, Democrats rebuke Among Republicans, the response has largely been supportive. Sen. Lindsey Graham called the strike “the right call,” while Rep. Mike Lawler praised it for neutralising the nuclear threat without declaring war. Former Trump officials and conservative think tanks framed the move as necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran. However, the party isn’t monolithic. Isolationist voices like Rep. Massie questioned not just the constitutionality but the strategic wisdom of escalating conflict in the Middle East—especially when Trump's base had long opposed “forever wars.” Meanwhile, Democrats, particularly progressives, have taken a sharply critical stance. Rep. Sean Casten (IL) and Sen. Bernie Sanders both labeled the action “grossly unconstitutional.” Casten even called it “an unambiguous impeachable offense.” DNC Chair Ken Martin added, “Americans overwhelmingly do not want to go to war. This is reckless.” Interestingly, not all Democrats toed the same line. Sen. John Fetterman, known for his centrist pragmatism, said he supported the strike because “Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear capabilities.” This shows how concerns over Iran’s ambitions cross party lines, even if agreement on Trump’s method is lacking. Global and domestic consequences The most immediate concern is regional escalation. Iran has vowed to retaliate, calling the strikes “criminal” and warning of “everlasting consequences.” The attack could reignite hostilities across the Middle East, where US forces remain vulnerable, and tensions with Iran-backed militias are already high. Observers fear that a tit-for-tat spiral could destabilise the entire region—from the Strait of Hormuz to the Golan Heights. With Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria already embroiled in conflict, the addition of a direct US-Iran confrontation could prove catastrophic. Diplomatic fallout The strikes all but obliterate hopes of a diplomatic thaw with Iran. Trust, already frayed since Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, is now likely beyond repair. Any backchannel or formal negotiations around nuclear containment are off the table for the foreseeable future. Domestically, the strikes could boomerang. Public opinion has shifted against military adventurism, and any US casualties or drawn-out confrontation could sour voters. Already, Congressional Democrats are preparing legal challenges and legislative remedies. Sen. Kaine and Rep. Khanna have introduced measures to curtail Trump’s war-making powers, setting the stage for a renewed debate on the War Powers Resolution. Most crucially, the strikes may set a precedent. If Congress fails to push back, future presidents—regardless of party—may feel emboldened to bypass legislative oversight in matters of war. A defining moment Trump’s decision to strike Iran has reawakened a fundamental constitutional question: where does presidential authority end, and Congressional oversight begin? This moment may prove pivotal—not just for Trump, but for American democracy itself. The legal and political battles playing out in Washington will shape how war powers are exercised, contested, and understood for years to come. Whether Trump’s actions are ultimately vindicated or condemned, they have already triggered a reckoning—one that will define the limits of presidential power in an era of high-stakes global conflict.

US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan

Trump ordered the shot on Iran, but can he really declare war? What the law says as Dems and even GOP oppose another 'stupid war'

As per a Washington-based human rights group, Iran's death toll may be far higher than Iran admits. The group ‘Human Rights Activists’ claims that at least 950 people have been killed across Iran as a result of Israel's recent wave of airstrikes — a staggering figure that sharply contrasts Tehran's official count. The group, Human Rights Activists, cross-checks local reports in the Islamic Republic against a network of sources inside the country. The group previously provided casualty figures during the 2022 protests in the aftermath of the death of Mahsa Amini.<h2>What is the toll as per Human Rights Activists?</h2>The group ‘Human Rights Activists’ says that at least 950 people have died across Iran due to Israeli airstrikes. Of the dead, it says it has identified 380 as civilians and 253 to be members of Iran's security forces. Additionally, 3,450 others have been wounded in the ongoing onslaught, said the group.Previously, on Thursday (Jun 19), the group said that 657 people have been killed across Iran, and at least 2,037 have been wounded. Among them, it said it identified 263 civilians and 164 security force personnel.Watch | IAEA chief says underground damage at Fordow unknown at UN Security Council emergency meeting <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaea-chief-says-underground-damage-at-fordow-unknown-at-un-security-council-emergency-meeting-1750662649323/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaea-chief-says-underground-damage-at-fordow-unknown-at-un-security-council-emergency-meeting-1750662649323/embed</a><h2>What is the death toll according to Iran?</h2>The Iranian government, however, continues to downplay the scale of the damage. On Saturday (Jun 21), the country's Health Ministry admitted to just 400 dead and over 3,000 injured, without offering further breakdowns or regular updates.Tehran is yet to share a death toll, if any, from the US strikes on its nuclear bases. In an address to the nation following the bombings, Trump said "A short time ago the US military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan," adding that everyone heard those names for years as Iran built what Trump referred to as a "horribly destructive enterprise."Calling the strikes a 'spectacular military success, ' Trump said that “Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”Labelling Tehran the world's number one state sponsor of terror, Trump said that the US's objective with these strikes was the "destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat" posed by the nation. &nbsp;

The group ‘Human Rights Activists’ says that at least 950 people have died across Iran due to Israeli airstrikes. Of the dead, it says it has identified 380 as civilians and 253 to be members of Iran's security forces.

As per a Washington-based human rights group, Iran's death toll may be far higher than Iran admits. The group ‘Human Rights Activists’ claims that at least 950 people have been killed across Iran as a result of Israel's recent wave of airstrikes — a staggering figure that sharply contrasts Tehran's official count. The group, Human Rights Activists, cross-checks local reports in the Islamic Republic against a network of sources inside the country. The group previously provided casualty figures during the 2022 protests in the aftermath of the death of Mahsa Amini. What is the toll as per Human Rights Activists? The group ‘Human Rights Activists’ says that at least 950 people have died across Iran due to Israeli airstrikes. Of the dead, it says it has identified 380 as civilians and 253 to be members of Iran's security forces. Additionally, 3,450 others have been wounded in the ongoing onslaught, said the group. Previously, on Thursday (Jun 19), the group said that 657 people have been killed across Iran, and at least 2,037 have been wounded. Among them, it said it identified 263 civilians and 164 security force personnel. Watch | IAEA chief says underground damage at Fordow unknown at UN Security Council emergency meeting https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaea-chief-says-underground-damage-at-fordow-unknown-at-un-security-council-emergency-meeting-1750662649323/embed What is the death toll according to Iran? The Iranian government, however, continues to downplay the scale of the damage. On Saturday (Jun 21), the country's Health Ministry admitted to just 400 dead and over 3,000 injured, without offering further breakdowns or regular updates. Tehran is yet to share a death toll, if any, from the US strikes on its nuclear bases. In an address to the nation following the bombings, Trump said "A short time ago the US military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan," adding that everyone heard those names for years as Iran built what Trump referred to as a "horribly destructive enterprise." Calling the strikes a 'spectacular military success, ' Trump said that “Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” Labelling Tehran the world's number one state sponsor of terror, Trump said that the US's objective with these strikes was the "destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat" posed by the nation.

The group ‘Human Rights Activists’ says that at least 950 people have died across Iran due to Israeli airstrikes. Of the dead, it says it has identified 380 as civilians and 253 to be members of Iran's security forces.

Iran says 400 dead—rights group claims over 950 killed, around 3,500 wounded in Israeli strikes

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after Trump’s ‘bullseye’ strike on nuclear sites; says 'we will end' this war

‘Keep oil prices down. I’m watching’: Trump issues warning after Iran strikes

'Take away power of this regime': Trump 'still interested' in Iran diplomacy

What is Iran's 'invisible' Kheibar Shekan missile that pierced the Iron Dome?

How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities

Want US visa? Unlock social media accounts for vetting, embassy tells Indians

AQ Khan network: When Pakistani scientist helped Iran's nuclear programme

How Iran, Israel are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?

B-2 Bomber helped Israel, but its origins lie in Hitler’s secret Nazi war files

Given explosive payload utilised 'significant damage' likely to Fordow: IAEA

Was Trump’s sudden G7 exit linked to Iranian sleeper cell threat? Report claims

Israeli strike hits entrance of Iran's Evin Prison. Why is it notorious?

Did Iran anticipate US strike and shift uranium before bombs hit Fordow?

Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal

'Iran not the first time': How many times has US used B-2 bomber in combat?

What weapons did US use to 'completely obliterate' Iran’s key nuclear sites?

WATCH-Israel attacks Iran airfields, destroys F-14 jet, missile storage sites

Did you know China's links to Iranian nuclear programme goes back many years?

Why didn't the US strike Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant in Midnight Hammer ops?

Explained: What's with the 'syringe attacks' on public in France?

Are these US bases sitting ducks for Iran? Military assets on high alert

Where is Iran's 60 pc enriched uranium? What satellite pics, Israel, US say

Michigan church shooting: Attacker killed after firing during Bible school

'Soulless machines’: Pope Leo XIV warns AI may harm young minds, blur reality

Trump ordered the shot on Iran, but can he really declare war? What the law says

Iran says 400 dead—rights group claims over 950 killed in Israeli strikes