National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

Bangladesh has resumed full visa and consular services at its missions in India, including in New Delhi, Agartala, and Siliguri, as ties take a positive turn. Services had been suspended since late December 2025 amid security concerns and protests near diplomatic premises. The suspension began on 22 December, when the Bangladesh High Commission in Delhi and the Assistant High Commission in Agartala halted consular operations indefinitely, citing "unavoidable circumstances". The visa application centre in Siliguri followed suit shortly after.The resumption comes just days after a major political shift in Dhaka. Tarique Rahman, leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), was sworn in as Prime Minister following his party's decisive victory in recent elections, ending the Yunus-led interim period that had seen relations with India deteriorate sharply.Resumption of visas is an early signal from the new government of its intent to reset ties with New Delhi. Under the previous interim setup, anti-India sentiment had risen, with incidents including threats to Indian missions and restrictions on visa processing.The thaw has been underscored at the leadership level. Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with his Bangladeshi counterpart shortly after the oath-taking and extended a formal invitation for Rahman to visit India at the earliest convenience, along with his family. The invitation was conveyed in a personal letter handed over by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla during his attendance at the swearing-in ceremony in Dhaka.PM Modi congratulated Rahman on the BNP's electoral success, describing it as a reflection of public trust in his leadership, and expressed eagerness to collaborate on connectivity, trade, energy, and regional cooperation.The developments are seen as positive elements in India-Bangladesh relations, which have historically been close but faced challenges under the Yunus interim government. The swift restoration of visa services is expected to ease people-to-people contacts and boost economic exchanges between the neighbours.

Under the previous interim setup, anti-India sentiment had risen, with incidents including threats to Indian missions and restrictions on visa processing.

Bangladesh has resumed full visa and consular services at its missions in India, including in New Delhi, Agartala, and Siliguri, as ties take a positive turn. Services had been suspended since late December 2025 amid security concerns and protests near diplomatic premises. The suspension began on 22 December, when the Bangladesh High Commission in Delhi and the Assistant High Commission in Agartala halted consular operations indefinitely, citing "unavoidable circumstances". The visa application centre in Siliguri followed suit shortly after. The resumption comes just days after a major political shift in Dhaka. Tarique Rahman, leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), was sworn in as Prime Minister following his party's decisive victory in recent elections, ending the Yunus-led interim period that had seen relations with India deteriorate sharply. Resumption of visas is an early signal from the new government of its intent to reset ties with New Delhi. Under the previous interim setup, anti-India sentiment had risen, with incidents including threats to Indian missions and restrictions on visa processing. The thaw has been underscored at the leadership level. Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with his Bangladeshi counterpart shortly after the oath-taking and extended a formal invitation for Rahman to visit India at the earliest convenience, along with his family. The invitation was conveyed in a personal letter handed over by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla during his attendance at the swearing-in ceremony in Dhaka. PM Modi congratulated Rahman on the BNP's electoral success, describing it as a reflection of public trust in his leadership, and expressed eagerness to collaborate on connectivity, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. The developments are seen as positive elements in India-Bangladesh relations, which have historically been close but faced challenges under the Yunus interim government. The swift restoration of visa services is expected to ease people-to-people contacts and boost economic exchanges between the neighbours.

Under the previous interim setup, anti-India sentiment had risen, with incidents including threats to Indian missions and restrictions on visa processing.

Bangladesh resumes visa services in India amid thaw in ties with new PM Tarique Rahman

After US President Donald Trump announced a 10 per cent global tariff following the US Supreme Court ruling that struck down many of his sweeping trade duties, a White House official clarified that tariff rates for India fall from 18 per cent to 10 per cent. This comes after a ruling by the United States’ top court, which stated that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) “does not authorise the President to impose tariffs.”When asked whether India will be paying 10 per cent tariffs and if they would replace earlier tariffs imposed by Trump under the IEEPA, a White House official told ANI, “Yes, 10 per cent until another authority is invoked.” The official also advised US trade partners to abide by the trade deals.After suffering a major legal blow from the US Supreme Court, Trump announced a 10 per cent global tariff “effective immediately” under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The temporary duty is applicable for a period of 150 days and is set to take effect from February 24.“It is my Great Honor to have just signed, from the Oval Office, a Global 10% Tariff on all Countries, which will be effective almost immediately,” Trump announced on his Truth Social platform.<h2>What did US Supreme Court rule?</h2>The US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) ruled 6-3 in the judgment, saying that Trump’s tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful.The court noted that “had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs” with IEEPA, “it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes.”<h2>Trump says ‘nothing changes’</h2>Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, Trump said India will continue to face 18 per cent tariffs.“Nothing changes. They’ll be paying tariffs, and we will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what used to be,” Trump said, calling it a “fair deal”. He also described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a great gentleman a great man” and said the agreement marked a reversal of past trade terms.“In terms of the US, He was ripping us off. So we made a deal with India. A fair deal now. We are not paying tariffs to them, and they are. We did a little flip,” said Trump.

After the US Supreme Court struck down Trump’s IEEPA tariffs, he imposed a temporary 10% global tariff under the Trade Act of 1974. India’s rate drops to 10%, though Trump says “nothing changes.”

After US President Donald Trump announced a 10 per cent global tariff following the US Supreme Court ruling that struck down many of his sweeping trade duties, a White House official clarified that tariff rates for India fall from 18 per cent to 10 per cent. This comes after a ruling by the United States’ top court, which stated that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) “does not authorise the President to impose tariffs.” When asked whether India will be paying 10 per cent tariffs and if they would replace earlier tariffs imposed by Trump under the IEEPA, a White House official told ANI, “Yes, 10 per cent until another authority is invoked.” The official also advised US trade partners to abide by the trade deals. After suffering a major legal blow from the US Supreme Court, Trump announced a 10 per cent global tariff “effective immediately” under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The temporary duty is applicable for a period of 150 days and is set to take effect from February 24. “It is my Great Honor to have just signed, from the Oval Office, a Global 10% Tariff on all Countries, which will be effective almost immediately,” Trump announced on his Truth Social platform. What did US Supreme Court rule? The US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) ruled 6-3 in the judgment, saying that Trump’s tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. The court noted that “had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs” with IEEPA, “it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes.” Trump says ‘nothing changes’ Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, Trump said India will continue to face 18 per cent tariffs. “Nothing changes. They’ll be paying tariffs, and we will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what used to be,” Trump said, calling it a “fair deal”. He also described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a great gentleman a great man” and said the agreement marked a reversal of past trade terms. “In terms of the US, He was ripping us off. So we made a deal with India. A fair deal now. We are not paying tariffs to them, and they are. We did a little flip,” said Trump.

After the US Supreme Court struck down Trump’s IEEPA tariffs, he imposed a temporary 10% global tariff under the Trade Act of 1974. India’s rate drops to 10%, though Trump says “nothing changes.”

Will India pay 10% or 18% tariffs after SCOTUS rules Trump’s duties illegal? White House says…

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Feb 20) said India will continue to face 18 per cent tariffs, even after the Supreme Court struck down sweeping reciprocal tariffs. The remarks came days after the court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that Trump's sweeping duties on imports from nearly all trading partners violated federal law. The judges held that he lacked the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose such wide-ranging tariffs.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-neal-katyal-all-about-the-indian-origin-lawyer-who-led-legal-challenge-against-trump-tariffs-at-scotus-1771641242108">Who is Neal Katyal? Indian-origin lawyer behind SCOTUS ruling on Trump tariffs</a><h2>What happens to 18% India tariffs?</h2>Trump was blunt when asked about the impact on the India deal. "Nothing changes," he said in response to ANI. The trade arrangement, he added, remains intact and is expected to be signed by the end of March.Under the interim US-India trade deal framework announced earlier this month, Washington reduced proposed tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from an earlier 50 per cent. In return, New Delhi agreed to eliminate tariffs on US goods."Nothing changes. They'll be paying tariffs, and we will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what used to be," Trump said, calling it a "fair deal". He also described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as "a great gentleman a great man" and said the agreement marked a reversal of past trade terms."In terms of the US, He was ripping us off. So we made a deal with India. A fair deal now. We are not paying tariffs to them, and they are. We did a little flip," said Trump.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/donald-trump-suffers-first-major-blow-to-his-economic-and-diplomatic-policy-opinion-1771637528141">Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy</a><h2>What the US-India trade deal covers</h2>India has agreed to cut or remove duties on US industrial goods and a range of farm products. These include dried distillers’ grains, red sorghum, tree nuts, fruits, soybean oil, wine and spirits.The US, on its part, will apply the 18 per cent tariff to Indian exports such as textiles, leather goods, footwear, chemicals, plastics, home decor and certain machinery.Notably, while the two nations announced the framework, the deal is yet to be signed. Officials from both countries are set to meet in the US on February 23 for three days to finalise the legal text. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently said the agreement is likely to take effect in April.&nbsp;

Will India still face 18 per cent US tariffs even after the Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping reciprocal duties? President Trump says “nothing changes” under the interim trade deal.

Scroll down to find out what happens next.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Feb 20) said India will continue to face 18 per cent tariffs, even after the Supreme Court struck down sweeping reciprocal tariffs. The remarks came days after the court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that Trump's sweeping duties on imports from nearly all trading partners violated federal law. The judges held that he lacked the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose such wide-ranging tariffs. Also read | Who is Neal Katyal? Indian-origin lawyer behind SCOTUS ruling on Trump tariffs What happens to 18% India tariffs? Trump was blunt when asked about the impact on the India deal. "Nothing changes," he said in response to ANI. The trade arrangement, he added, remains intact and is expected to be signed by the end of March. Under the interim US-India trade deal framework announced earlier this month, Washington reduced proposed tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from an earlier 50 per cent. In return, New Delhi agreed to eliminate tariffs on US goods. "Nothing changes. They'll be paying tariffs, and we will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what used to be," Trump said, calling it a "fair deal". He also described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as "a great gentleman a great man" and said the agreement marked a reversal of past trade terms. "In terms of the US, He was ripping us off. So we made a deal with India. A fair deal now. We are not paying tariffs to them, and they are. We did a little flip," said Trump. Also read | Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy What the US-India trade deal covers India has agreed to cut or remove duties on US industrial goods and a range of farm products. These include dried distillers’ grains, red sorghum, tree nuts, fruits, soybean oil, wine and spirits. The US, on its part, will apply the 18 per cent tariff to Indian exports such as textiles, leather goods, footwear, chemicals, plastics, home decor and certain machinery. Notably, while the two nations announced the framework, the deal is yet to be signed. Officials from both countries are set to meet in the US on February 23 for three days to finalise the legal text. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently said the agreement is likely to take effect in April.

Will India still face 18 per cent US tariffs even after the Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping reciprocal duties? President Trump says “nothing changes” under the interim trade deal.Scroll down to find out what happens next.

Will India still pay 18% tariffs after SCOTUS scraps Trump reciprocal duties? Here’s what the POTUS said

The US military on Friday (Feb 20) launched another strike against an alleged drug boat in the Eastern Pacific, killing three people. In a post on X, the US Southern Command said that the vessel was operated by “Designated Terrorist Organizations”. The strikes come as US President Donald Trump continues his campaign in the Caribbean and Pacific waters as part of a crackdown against alleged drug smuggling boats. The latest strike marks the second one this week.“On Feb. 20, at the direction of #SOUTHCOM commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations. Three male narco-terrorists were killed during this action. No U.S. military forces were harmed,” US Southern Command wrote on X.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">On Feb. 20, at the direction of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SOUTHCOM?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SOUTHCOM</a> commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known… <a href="https://t.co/PzWQFfNgHm">pic.twitter.com/PzWQFfNgHm</a>&mdash; U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) <a href="https://twitter.com/Southcom/status/2025006036776878463?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 21, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Earlier on Monday (Feb 16), the US military struck three alleged drug boars in the eastern Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea, killing 11 people.&nbsp;US President Donald Trump’s administration began striking alleged drug smuggling vessels in early September, claiming that it is effectively at war with “narco-terrorists” operating out of Venezuela. Since then, nearly 150 people have been killed while dozens of vessels have been targeted.Despite mounting criticism over the legality of the US military action in the Caribbean and Pacific, the Trump administration has provided no evidence that the vessels are involved in drug trafficking.Earlier in January, American forces seized Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, who has been accused by Trump of smuggling drugs into the United States.On January 3, the US military launched Operation Absolute Resolve, in which they entered Venezuela, bombed Caracas and captured Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their presidential palace. While no US casualties in the operation, Havana authorities said that 32 Cubans were killed during the US attack on Caracas that resulted in the capture of Maduro. One Colombian was also killed. Trump has also warned Mexico, Colombia, and Cuba of a possible US military action.

The US military struck an alleged drug-smuggling boat in the Eastern Pacific, killing three. Southern Command said it was run by designated terrorist groups, marking the second strike this week.

The US military on Friday (Feb 20) launched another strike against an alleged drug boat in the Eastern Pacific, killing three people. In a post on X, the US Southern Command said that the vessel was operated by “Designated Terrorist Organizations”. The strikes come as US President Donald Trump continues his campaign in the Caribbean and Pacific waters as part of a crackdown against alleged drug smuggling boats. The latest strike marks the second one this week. “On Feb. 20, at the direction of #SOUTHCOM commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations. Three male narco-terrorists were killed during this action. No U.S. military forces were harmed,” US Southern Command wrote on X.

The US military struck an alleged drug-smuggling boat in the Eastern Pacific, killing three. Southern Command said it was run by designated terrorist groups, marking the second strike this week.

US strike on alleged drug boat in Eastern Pacific kills three in second attack this week

Neal Katyal, the son of Indian immigrants, who once served as a top advocate of America's top courtroom, has emerged as the face of the landmark Supreme Court judgement that struck down US President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs. The SCOTUS's Friday (Feb 20) decision represented a major blow to Trump in his second term. It stripped away a powerful tool he had aggressively utilised to reshape American trade pacts, collect substantial sums from US companies importing foreign goods, and intervene in the domestic matters of countries whose leaders did not comply with his directives. Who is Neal Katyal? All you need to know.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/donald-trump-suffers-first-major-blow-to-his-economic-and-diplomatic-policy-opinion-1771637528141">Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy</a><h2>Son of immigrants able to say ‘president is acting illegally’</h2>Katyal, a former Acting Solicitor General of the United States, argued against Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose what he described as "unjust, unconstitutional taxes"."The US Supreme Court gave us everything we asked for in our legal case. Everything," said Katyal after the ruling. "This case has always been about the presidency, not any one president. It has always been about the separation of powers, and not the politics of the moment," he added.“I was able to go to court -- the son of immigrants -- and say on behalf of American small businesses, 'Hey, this president is acting illegally.' I was able to present my case, have them ask really hard questions, and at the end of it, they voted and we won. That is something extraordinary about this country,” Neal Katyal told MS Now.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Neal Katyal: &quot;I was able to go to court -- the son of immigrants -- and say on behalf of American small businesses, &#39;Hey, this president is acting illegally.&#39; I was able to present my case, have them ask really hard questions, and at the end of it they voted and we won. That is… <a href="https://t.co/FhCtgOgyMx">pic.twitter.com/FhCtgOgyMx</a>&mdash; Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/2024955825916162140?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The administration had framed the tariffs as necessary to address trade deficits and the fentanyl crisis, calling them matters of national emergency. Katyal countered that the move amounted to unlawful taxation without congressional approval. "Presidents are powerful, but our Constitution is more powerful still," Katyal said after the ruling. "In America, only Congress can impose taxes on the American people."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/royal-shock-uk-weighs-removing-andrew-mountbatten-windsor-from-line-of-succession-for-british-throne-over-epstein-links-1771637027122">UK weighs removing Andrew from British throne line of succession over Epstein links</a><h2>Who is Neal Katyal?</h2>Born in Chicago to Indian immigrant parents, a doctor and an engineer, Katyal has spent much of his career at the centre of major constitutional disputes. He graduated from Dartmouth College and Yale Law School and clerked for Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.In 2010, President Barack Obama appointed him Acting Solicitor General, making him the federal government’s top courtroom advocate. Over the years, Katyal has argued more than 50 cases before the Supreme Court, earning recognition as one of the most prominent appellate lawyers in the country.He is currently a partner at Milbank LLP and a professor at Georgetown University Law Center. His past work includes defending the Voting Rights Act, challenging Trump’s 2017 travel ban, and serving as a special prosecutor in Minnesota in the George Floyd case.

Who is Neal Katyal? The Indian origin former US Acting Solicitor General led the Supreme Court challenge that struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Here's all you need to know about him.

Neal Katyal, the son of Indian immigrants, who once served as a top advocate of America's top courtroom, has emerged as the face of the landmark Supreme Court judgement that struck down US President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs. The SCOTUS's Friday (Feb 20) decision represented a major blow to Trump in his second term. It stripped away a powerful tool he had aggressively utilised to reshape American trade pacts, collect substantial sums from US companies importing foreign goods, and intervene in the domestic matters of countries whose leaders did not comply with his directives. Who is Neal Katyal? All you need to know. Also read | Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy Son of immigrants able to say ‘president is acting illegally’ Katyal, a former Acting Solicitor General of the United States, argued against Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose what he described as "unjust, unconstitutional taxes". "The US Supreme Court gave us everything we asked for in our legal case. Everything," said Katyal after the ruling. "This case has always been about the presidency, not any one president. It has always been about the separation of powers, and not the politics of the moment," he added. “I was able to go to court -- the son of immigrants -- and say on behalf of American small businesses, 'Hey, this president is acting illegally.' I was able to present my case, have them ask really hard questions, and at the end of it, they voted and we won. That is something extraordinary about this country,” Neal Katyal told MS Now.

Who is Neal Katyal? The Indian origin former US Acting Solicitor General led the Supreme Court challenge that struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Here's all you need to know about him.

Who is Neal Katyal? All about the Indian-origin lawyer who led legal challenge against Trump tariffs at SCOTUS

The US Supreme Court on Friday struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 decision that translates to a clear message: your executive powers have limits.The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his second term. It removes a tool he has aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will.The most glaring example of tariffs as a political punishment came in July when Trump slapped a 50 percent on most Brazilian goods in response to what he called a “witch hunt” against former president Jair Bolsonaro, who was on trial for an attempted coup.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-neal-katyal-all-about-the-indian-origin-lawyer-who-led-legal-challenge-against-trump-tariffs-at-scotus-1771641242108">Who is Neal Katyal? All about the Indian-origin lawyer who led legal challenge against Trump tariffs at SCOTUS</a>The Brazilian government ignored the apparent attempt to stop the trial and Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years in prison.India was another example of Trump tariffs as a geopolitical weapon. Last August, tariffs on goods from India were doubled to 50 per cent as punishment for continued purchases of discounted Russian oil. &nbsp;The row was settled in February with an agreement to roll back tariffs from 50 to 18 per cent in exchange forthe &nbsp;Indian agreement to eliminate tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods with the stated goal to bring all barriers to zero. &nbsp;In an angry press conference denouncing the Supreme Court judges, Trump singled out Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a great man” and stressed that under the US.-Indian trade agreement, the US is no longer paying tariffs to India.The court on Friday rued that Trump had overstepped his legal authority by imposing broad tariffs on countries around the world without clear approval from Congress. &nbsp;Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, saying that if the Trump administration was allowed to pursue its tax agenda, “it would replace the long-standing executive-legislative collaboration over trade policy with unchecked Presidential policy-making. Accordingly, the President must point to clear congressional authorisation to justify his extraordinary assertion of the power to impose tariffs. He cannot,”The ruling applies to tariffs Trump announced on what he called “Liberation Day” on April 2, when he invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to address trade imbalances. Ostensibly, part of the “emergency” was rooted in the flow of drugs from Mexico and Canada.Friday’s ruling could be something of a turning point in Trump’s relentless pursuit of more executive power, which has stirred mass protests on several occasions by demonstrators lofting signs saying “No Kings.”The Supreme Court’s 6-3 majority has blessed Trump’s expansive exertion of presidential powers in a series of other rulings issued on an emergency basis. Friday’s decision enraged Trump in particular because two of the six judges who ruled against him were appointed by him in his first term.What was left unclear was whether the estimated $175 billion collected since “liberation day” would be returned to the importers who paid them. Much of the money was passed on to consumers and essentially amounted to taxes. That stood in contrast to Trump's campaign pledges that he would reduce taxes.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-absolutely-ashamed-of-certain-members-of-court-trump-lashes-out-at-supreme-court-over-tariff-decision-1771612420264">Trump announces 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court</a>Importers have already filed more than 1,000 lawsuits in the Court of International Trade, and a flood of new cases is likely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the logistics of refunds could drag on for “weeks, months, years.”Opposition to the reciprocal tariffs the Supreme Court ruled on had come from both sides of America’s division, even from Trump’s Vice President during his first term, Mike Pence, founder of Advancing American Freedom, a group that has lobbied against the levies.“American families and American businesses pay American tariffs – not foreign countries. With this decision, American families can sigh a breath of relief,” he said.Perhaps. Trump has already made clear that he will re-impose tariffs using other laws on presidential authority. He has not spelt out details but announced a new global tariff of 10 per cent.Even for a White House which excels in creating alternative realities, it will be difficult to portray the Supreme Court ruling as anything but an embarrassing defeat. Democrats will no doubt use it in the campaign for mid-term elections in November, a contest for the House of Representatives Republicans are predicted to lose. &nbsp;That would turn Donald Trump into a very lame duck and change the Washington political scene. &nbsp;

The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his 2nd term. It removes a tool he aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will.

The US Supreme Court on Friday struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 decision that translates to a clear message: your executive powers have limits. The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his second term. It removes a tool he has aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will. The most glaring example of tariffs as a political punishment came in July when Trump slapped a 50 percent on most Brazilian goods in response to what he called a “witch hunt” against former president Jair Bolsonaro, who was on trial for an attempted coup. Also read | Who is Neal Katyal? All about the Indian-origin lawyer who led legal challenge against Trump tariffs at SCOTUS The Brazilian government ignored the apparent attempt to stop the trial and Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years in prison. India was another example of Trump tariffs as a geopolitical weapon. Last August, tariffs on goods from India were doubled to 50 per cent as punishment for continued purchases of discounted Russian oil. The row was settled in February with an agreement to roll back tariffs from 50 to 18 per cent in exchange forthe Indian agreement to eliminate tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods with the stated goal to bring all barriers to zero. In an angry press conference denouncing the Supreme Court judges, Trump singled out Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a great man” and stressed that under the US.-Indian trade agreement, the US is no longer paying tariffs to India. The court on Friday rued that Trump had overstepped his legal authority by imposing broad tariffs on countries around the world without clear approval from Congress. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, saying that if the Trump administration was allowed to pursue its tax agenda, “it would replace the long-standing executive-legislative collaboration over trade policy with unchecked Presidential policy-making. Accordingly, the President must point to clear congressional authorisation to justify his extraordinary assertion of the power to impose tariffs. He cannot,” The ruling applies to tariffs Trump announced on what he called “Liberation Day” on April 2, when he invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to address trade imbalances. Ostensibly, part of the “emergency” was rooted in the flow of drugs from Mexico and Canada. Friday’s ruling could be something of a turning point in Trump’s relentless pursuit of more executive power, which has stirred mass protests on several occasions by demonstrators lofting signs saying “No Kings.” The Supreme Court’s 6-3 majority has blessed Trump’s expansive exertion of presidential powers in a series of other rulings issued on an emergency basis. Friday’s decision enraged Trump in particular because two of the six judges who ruled against him were appointed by him in his first term. What was left unclear was whether the estimated $175 billion collected since “liberation day” would be returned to the importers who paid them. Much of the money was passed on to consumers and essentially amounted to taxes. That stood in contrast to Trump's campaign pledges that he would reduce taxes. Also read | Trump announces 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court Importers have already filed more than 1,000 lawsuits in the Court of International Trade, and a flood of new cases is likely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the logistics of refunds could drag on for “weeks, months, years.” Opposition to the reciprocal tariffs the Supreme Court ruled on had come from both sides of America’s division, even from Trump’s Vice President during his first term, Mike Pence, founder of Advancing American Freedom, a group that has lobbied against the levies. “American families and American businesses pay American tariffs – not foreign countries. With this decision, American families can sigh a breath of relief,” he said. Perhaps. Trump has already made clear that he will re-impose tariffs using other laws on presidential authority. He has not spelt out details but announced a new global tariff of 10 per cent. Even for a White House which excels in creating alternative realities, it will be difficult to portray the Supreme Court ruling as anything but an embarrassing defeat. Democrats will no doubt use it in the campaign for mid-term elections in November, a contest for the House of Representatives Republicans are predicted to lose. That would turn Donald Trump into a very lame duck and change the Washington political scene.

The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his 2nd term. It removes a tool he aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will.

Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy

The British government on Friday (Feb 20) weighed whether to introduce legislation that would remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, previously known as Prince Andrew, from the line of succession for the British throne. This comes as the UK police widen their investigation into the disgraced royal's past conduct and his ties to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.Andrew was arrested on Thursday (Feb 19) at his residence on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He was released after 11 hours in custody, but inquiries are continuing.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-it-s-a-shame-very-sad-trump-weighs-in-after-andrew-mountbatten-windsor-s-detention-over-epstein-links-1771553701280">'It’s a shame...very sad': Trump weighs in on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's detention over Epstein links</a><h2>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the British throne</h2>King Charles III has already stripped his younger brother of military affiliations and royal titles and removed him from his Windsor residence. However, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne, behind Princess Lilibet, the daughter of Prince Harry.According to sources cited by AFP, the government could consider bringing forward legislation to alter the line of succession once the police investigation concludes. Such a move would be unprecedented in modern times and legally complex. Any change would require not only an act of the UK Parliament but also the agreement of 14 other Commonwealth realms where King Charles is head of state.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-jesus-im-coming-jeffrey-epstein-s-lewd-email-about-pope-francis-revealed-here-s-what-he-said-1771390161305">'Jesus Im c**ing': Jeffrey Epstein's lewd email about Pope Francis REVEALED. Here's what he said</a><h2>Police expand inquiries</h2>London’s Metropolitan Police confirmed it is seeking information from officers who were assigned to Andrew during his time as a UK trade envoy from 2001 to 2011. Investigators are asking whether they "saw or heard during that period of service that may be relevant to our ongoing reviews".Authorities are also reportedly coordinating with US counterparts to examine allegations tied to flights connected to Jeffrey Epstein. These flights allegedly helped traffic girls and women in and out of London airports. Multiple British police forces are reviewing claims emerging from recently released Epstein-related documents.Police continued searches at Andrew’s former Windsor home, Royal Lodge, into Friday.<h2>Public opinion turns sharply against Andrew</h2>Public sentiment has shifted dramatically. A YouGov poll conducted after the arrest found that 82 per cent of respondents believe Andrew should be removed from the line of succession.Royal commentators say the arrest marks one of the most serious crises for the monarchy in decades. Any formal charges or trial could take considerable time, and legal proceedings to amend the succession would likely be lengthy.Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing. In 2022, he settled a US civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre without admitting liability. As investigations unfold, the monarchy faces renewed scrutiny over accountability and its future standing with the British public. &nbsp;

The British government is weighing whether to introduce legislation that could remove Prince Andrew, now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, from the line of succession as police widen inquiries into his past conduct and links to Jeffrey Epstein.

The British government on Friday (Feb 20) weighed whether to introduce legislation that would remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, previously known as Prince Andrew, from the line of succession for the British throne. This comes as the UK police widen their investigation into the disgraced royal's past conduct and his ties to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew was arrested on Thursday (Feb 19) at his residence on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He was released after 11 hours in custody, but inquiries are continuing. Also read | 'It’s a shame...very sad': Trump weighs in on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's detention over Epstein links Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the British throne King Charles III has already stripped his younger brother of military affiliations and royal titles and removed him from his Windsor residence. However, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne, behind Princess Lilibet, the daughter of Prince Harry. According to sources cited by AFP, the government could consider bringing forward legislation to alter the line of succession once the police investigation concludes. Such a move would be unprecedented in modern times and legally complex. Any change would require not only an act of the UK Parliament but also the agreement of 14 other Commonwealth realms where King Charles is head of state. Also read | 'Jesus Im c**ing': Jeffrey Epstein's lewd email about Pope Francis REVEALED. Here's what he said Police expand inquiries London’s Metropolitan Police confirmed it is seeking information from officers who were assigned to Andrew during his time as a UK trade envoy from 2001 to 2011. Investigators are asking whether they "saw or heard during that period of service that may be relevant to our ongoing reviews". Authorities are also reportedly coordinating with US counterparts to examine allegations tied to flights connected to Jeffrey Epstein. These flights allegedly helped traffic girls and women in and out of London airports. Multiple British police forces are reviewing claims emerging from recently released Epstein-related documents. Police continued searches at Andrew’s former Windsor home, Royal Lodge, into Friday. Public opinion turns sharply against Andrew Public sentiment has shifted dramatically. A YouGov poll conducted after the arrest found that 82 per cent of respondents believe Andrew should be removed from the line of succession. Royal commentators say the arrest marks one of the most serious crises for the monarchy in decades. Any formal charges or trial could take considerable time, and legal proceedings to amend the succession would likely be lengthy. Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing. In 2022, he settled a US civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre without admitting liability. As investigations unfold, the monarchy faces renewed scrutiny over accountability and its future standing with the British public.

The British government is weighing whether to introduce legislation that could remove Prince Andrew, now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, from the line of succession as police widen inquiries into his past conduct and links to Jeffrey Epstein.

Royal shock: UK weighs removing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from British throne line of succession over Epstein links

US President Donald Trump on Friday (February 20) called on Iran’s leadership to enter negotiations for what he described as a “fair deal,” while sharply condemning the government’s human rights record and voicing concern for its citizens. Speaking at the White House, Trump drew a distinction between Iran’s rulers and its population, saying the Iranian people were enduring severe hardship. He referenced what he described as a deadly crackdown, claiming that 32,000 individuals had been killed in a short span of time, the first occasion on which he cited a specific figure.&nbsp;Trump also alleged that Iranian authorities had planned to execute hundreds of detainees, describing public hangings carried out by crane. He said he warned Tehran that any execution would trigger an immediate response from the United States. According to Trump, after his warning, Iran abandoned plans to execute 837 prisoners. “They didn’t hang them,” he said, adding that he had been told no executions ultimately took place.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-absolutely-ashamed-of-certain-members-of-court-trump-lashes-out-at-supreme-court-over-tariff-decision-1771612420264">Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court</a>&nbsp;Earlier in the day, Trump hinted he was weighing the possibility of a limited military strike as leverage to push Iran toward negotiations, though he did not elaborate on what such action might involve. Reiterating his sympathy for ordinary Iranians, Trump said they had been forced to live under extremely harsh conditions.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed</a>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump on Thursday (February 19) warned Iran that it has 10 to 15 days to reach what he described as a “meaningful deal” or face serious repercussions, raising the prospect of military action in the Middle East. In response, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the president of the Security Council warning that any strike on Iran would render US bases, facilities and other assets “legitimate targets.”&nbsp;Amid the escalating war of words, US military deployments in the region have reportedly increased, with American forces said to be prepared for possible action as early as this weekend. The United States has also moved the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group closer to Iranian waters, signaling heightened readiness as tensions intensify.

US President Donald Trump urges Iran to negotiate a “fair deal,” warned against executions, criticised Tehran’s crackdown, and hinted at possible military action

US President Donald Trump on Friday (February 20) called on Iran’s leadership to enter negotiations for what he described as a “fair deal,” while sharply condemning the government’s human rights record and voicing concern for its citizens. Speaking at the White House, Trump drew a distinction between Iran’s rulers and its population, saying the Iranian people were enduring severe hardship. He referenced what he described as a deadly crackdown, claiming that 32,000 individuals had been killed in a short span of time, the first occasion on which he cited a specific figure. Trump also alleged that Iranian authorities had planned to execute hundreds of detainees, describing public hangings carried out by crane. He said he warned Tehran that any execution would trigger an immediate response from the United States. According to Trump, after his warning, Iran abandoned plans to execute 837 prisoners. “They didn’t hang them,” he said, adding that he had been told no executions ultimately took place. Also Read: Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court Earlier in the day, Trump hinted he was weighing the possibility of a limited military strike as leverage to push Iran toward negotiations, though he did not elaborate on what such action might involve. Reiterating his sympathy for ordinary Iranians, Trump said they had been forced to live under extremely harsh conditions. https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed US President Donald Trump on Thursday (February 19) warned Iran that it has 10 to 15 days to reach what he described as a “meaningful deal” or face serious repercussions, raising the prospect of military action in the Middle East. In response, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the president of the Security Council warning that any strike on Iran would render US bases, facilities and other assets “legitimate targets.” Amid the escalating war of words, US military deployments in the region have reportedly increased, with American forces said to be prepared for possible action as early as this weekend. The United States has also moved the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group closer to Iranian waters, signaling heightened readiness as tensions intensify.

US President Donald Trump urges Iran to negotiate a “fair deal,” warned against executions, criticised Tehran’s crackdown, and hinted at possible military action

'32,000 people were killed during crackdown in Iran', says Donald Trump

At least 75 countries are going to sign the 'Delhi Declaration', said to be a non-binding pledge or declaration on goals for AI development, after the AI Summit 2026. Meanwhile, the Indian government on Thursday (Feb 19) announced New Delhi Frontier AI Commitments. Union minister Ashwini Vaishnaw described them as a crucial outcome of the India AI Impact Summit 2026 and a shared voluntary framework adopted by leading global and Indian AI companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-to-attack-iran-soon-from-usss-abraham-lincoln-to-gerald-ford-us-deploys-these-warships-are-heading-towards-middle-east-nuclear-deal-1771605910151">Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East</a>&nbsp;Vaishnaw called it a “significant outcome" of the summit and added that “Today, leading frontier AI companies, along with our own AI companies, have come together to make a set of voluntary commitments a shared commitment for inclusive and shared AI.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;India hosted the grand Artificial Intelligence Summit (India AI Impact Summit 2026) from February 16 to 21 at the Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi. The summit brought heads of state, senior officials and tech executives under one roof. The summit was intended to highlight the increasing global significance of the technology.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-a-claim-to-overshadow-epstein-files-russia-demands-concrete-data-on-alexei-navalny-poisoning-allegation-putin-1771428712351">‘A claim to overshadow Epstein Files’: Russia demands ‘concrete data’ on Alexei Navalny poisoning allegation</a>&nbsp;In another development related to the AI Summit, India on Friday formally joined Pax Silica, the United States' flagship effort on AI (Artificial Intelligence) and supply chain security, advancing a new economic security consensus among allies and trusted partners.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/all-about-strait-of-hormuz-the-only-marine-entryway-into-gulf-and-why-it-s-at-the-centre-of-us-iran-nuke-tensions-1771344725283">All about Strait of Hormuz, the only marine entryway into Gulf and why it's at the centre of US-Iran nuke tensions</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

Seventy-five countries will sign the Delhi Declaration on inclusive AI development after India’s AI Summit 2026, which also unveiled Frontier AI Commitments and saw India join the US-led Pax Silica initiative.

At least 75 countries are going to sign the 'Delhi Declaration', said to be a non-binding pledge or declaration on goals for AI development, after the AI Summit 2026. Meanwhile, the Indian government on Thursday (Feb 19) announced New Delhi Frontier AI Commitments. Union minister Ashwini Vaishnaw described them as a crucial outcome of the India AI Impact Summit 2026 and a shared voluntary framework adopted by leading global and Indian AI companies. Also read: Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East Vaishnaw called it a “significant outcome" of the summit and added that “Today, leading frontier AI companies, along with our own AI companies, have come together to make a set of voluntary commitments a shared commitment for inclusive and shared AI.” Also read: US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options India hosted the grand Artificial Intelligence Summit (India AI Impact Summit 2026) from February 16 to 21 at the Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi. The summit brought heads of state, senior officials and tech executives under one roof. The summit was intended to highlight the increasing global significance of the technology. Also read: ‘A claim to overshadow Epstein Files’: Russia demands ‘concrete data’ on Alexei Navalny poisoning allegation In another development related to the AI Summit, India on Friday formally joined Pax Silica, the United States' flagship effort on AI (Artificial Intelligence) and supply chain security, advancing a new economic security consensus among allies and trusted partners. Also read: All about Strait of Hormuz, the only marine entryway into Gulf and why it's at the centre of US-Iran nuke tensions

Seventy-five countries will sign the Delhi Declaration on inclusive AI development after India’s AI Summit 2026, which also unveiled Frontier AI Commitments and saw India join the US-led Pax Silica initiative.

Delhi AI Summit: 75 countries to sign 'Delhi Declaration' for AI development

Republican leaders, officials, and aides of Donald Trump rallied behind the president after the US Supreme Court struck down his global tariffs on Friday.&nbsp;In one of the first reactions to the verdict from members of the Trump administration, US Chief of Protocol Monica Crowley downplayed the Supreme Court’s ruling in a post on X.“President Trump has plenty of tools in the tariff toolbox,” Crowley said. “Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump,” she added.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">President Trump has plenty of tools in the tariff toolbox. Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump 🇺🇸&mdash; Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) <a href="https://twitter.com/MonicaCrowley/status/2024876710450081992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-victory-for-americans-and-us-economy-democrats-rejoice-over-scotus-ruling-against-trump-s-tariffs-1771608358859">‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs</a>&nbsp;House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., also praised Trump’s tariffs in a post on X. He said the Congress and administration would “determine the best path forward in the coming weeks” in response to the tariffs ruling.Johnson wrote, “Trump’s tariffs have brought in billions of dollars and created immense leverage for America’s trade strategy and for securing strong, reciprocal America-first trade agreements with countries that had been taking advantage of American workers for decades.”&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">No one can deny that the President’s use of tariffs has brought in billions of dollars and created immense leverage for America’s trade strategy and for securing strong, reciprocal America-first trade agreements with countries that had been taking advantage of American workers…&mdash; Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SpeakerJohnson/status/2024892242930884617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Rep. Abe Hamadeh, of Arizona, also backed Trump’s tariffs, saying his policy “has been extraordinary successful.” Hamadeh added that he would “continue to work with the Administration on ensuring President Trump’s tariff policy continues, whether through existing executive action, or through Congress.”&nbsp;However, some House Republicans offered mixed responses to the ruling. Rep. French Hill, of Arkansas, who chairs the Financial Services Committee, said that while “tariffs can be a useful tool when applied in a targeted way,” the Supreme Court decision “underscores the need for Congress to play a role in trade policy.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-diversifying-energy-options-will-buy-venezuela-oil-says-us-ambassador-sergio-gor-1771597691150">India ‘diversifying’ energy options, will buy Venezuela oil, says US ambassador Sergio Gor</a>&nbsp;Republican US Senator from Ohio, Bernie Moreno, called the verdict “outrageous”. In a post on X, Moreno said, “SCOTUS’s outrageous ruling handcuffs our fight against unfair trade that has devastated American workers for decades. These tariffs protected jobs, revived manufacturing, and forced cheaters like China to pay up. Now globalists win, factories investments may reverse, and American workers lose again.”“This betrayal must be reversed and Republicans must get to work immediately on a reconciliation bill to codify the tariffs that had made our country the hottest country on earth!,” he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-absolutely-ashamed-of-certain-members-of-court-trump-lashes-out-at-supreme-court-over-tariff-decision-1771612420264">Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court</a>

House Speaker Mike Johnson also praised President Donald Trump’s tariffs and said the Congress and administration would “determine the best path forward in the coming weeks” in response to the Supreme Court’s tariffs ruling.

Republican leaders, officials, and aides of Donald Trump rallied behind the president after the US Supreme Court struck down his global tariffs on Friday. In one of the first reactions to the verdict from members of the Trump administration, US Chief of Protocol Monica Crowley downplayed the Supreme Court’s ruling in a post on X. “President Trump has plenty of tools in the tariff toolbox,” Crowley said. “Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump,” she added.

House Speaker Mike Johnson also praised President Donald Trump’s tariffs and said the Congress and administration would “determine the best path forward in the coming weeks” in response to the Supreme Court’s tariffs ruling.

‘Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump’: Republicans, aides rally behind president

President Donald Trump lashed out at the US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) after it struck down the tariffs he had imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), saying it "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." The US president said the decision is “deeply disappointing,” and "I am absolutely ashamed of certain members of the court" for not having “the courage to do what is right for our country.” He hailed the dissenting judges as patriots.&nbsp;&nbsp;Calling the judges who ruled against the tariffs ‘very unpatriotic’, Trump said, "In my opinion, the court has been swayed by foreign interest," adding that "Foreign countries are so happy and dancing on the street, and I can assure you - they won't dance longer," &nbsp;Trump said at a press conference after the verdict.&nbsp;Trump said, “This was an important case to me, more as economic security for the country" and threatened, ”I want to be very well. I understand how they are swayed away easily. I want to be a good boy.”&nbsp;

Mounting an attack on the apex court, the US president said, “I won by a million votes by landside despite the cheating “There was a lot of cheating.” Referring to Democrats and people opposed to his policies, he said, "These people are obnoxious, ignorant and loud, and certain justice is afraid of it.”&nbsp;He repeated his rhetoric of being a "president of peace", stating that “I settled eight wars, including India and Pakistan,” even if "you like it or not."<h2>Trump announces new 10 per cent global tariff</h2> Trump vowed to use other methods to reinstate sweeping tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down. “Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected,” adding that these options could also bring in more revenue.&nbsp;The US president announced that he was imposing an extra global tariff of 10 per cent on US trade partners.&nbsp;"The Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear, rather than less," he said.&nbsp;These remarks come after, the Supreme Court earlier in the day ruled, against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda.&nbsp;On April 2, 2025, a date he famously proclaimed as "Liberation Day," President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 to launch the most aggressive trade policy in modern American history. Invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by declaring a national emergency over the US trade deficit, the administration imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on nearly all global imports. This framework also introduced "reciprocal" duties reaching as high as 50% for major trading partners, aiming to counteract foreign trade barriers and revitalise domestic manufacturing.

Trump vowed to use other methods to reinstate sweeping tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down. “Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected,” he said, adding that these options could also bring in more revenue.

President Donald Trump lashed out at the US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) after it struck down the tariffs he had imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), saying it "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." The US president said the decision is “deeply disappointing,” and "I am absolutely ashamed of certain members of the court" for not having “the courage to do what is right for our country.” He hailed the dissenting judges as patriots. Calling the judges who ruled against the tariffs ‘very unpatriotic’, Trump said, "In my opinion, the court has been swayed by foreign interest," adding that "Foreign countries are so happy and dancing on the street, and I can assure you - they won't dance longer," Trump said at a press conference after the verdict. Trump said, “This was an important case to me, more as economic security for the country" and threatened, ”I want to be very well. I understand how they are swayed away easily. I want to be a good boy.”

Trump vowed to use other methods to reinstate sweeping tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down. “Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected,” he said, adding that these options could also bring in more revenue.

Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court

Ahead of the Supreme Court's landmark 6-3 ruling on Friday (Feb 20), Donald Trump told reporters that without tariffs, “the whole country would be bankrupt." The US president and his economic team had voiced their opinion, stating that the apex court should leave the trade policy in place. Also, highlighting the vital role of tariffs in his foreign policy and its importance in revenue generation.&nbsp;Initially, US-prosposed 50% tariff had been levied on India, which came into effect at 9.30 AM on August 27. Left, right and centre, the Trump administration was out there slapping tariffs on countries exporting goods into America. India's oil trade with Russia had not gone down well with the US president. He had warned that an additional 25% tariff would be imposed. Essentially, the 50% would impact $48.2 billion worth of export merchandise. This is likely to impact the exports of garments, jewellery, gems, footwear, furniture and chemicals.&nbsp;In a draft order, the US Department of Homeland Security said, "The duties…are effective with respect to products of India that are entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 am Eastern Daylight Time on August 27."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/donald-trump-s-tariff-what-will-happen-to-apple-s-made-in-india-iphone-supply-to-us-1756204656047">Donald Trump's tariff: What will happen to Apple's Made-in-India iPhone supply to US?</a>&nbsp;The two countries later signed a bilateral trade agreement. Despite the apex court's ruling, Trump stated that "nothing changes" regarding the framework of the India-US deal. February 2, the nations had struck a deal to drop the rate to 18%.&nbsp;On August 25, the US delegation was to be in India, but that has been deferred. When Trump announced tariffs, he was unsparing as even in the world's remotest region – a place ruled by penguins, seals, and birds. Heard and McDonald Islands – the icy archipelago does not have a single human on the land, and the last time people visited is believed to be about a decade ago. &nbsp;

On the eve of a landmark Supreme Court ruling, President Trump warned that the US "would be bankrupt" without tariff revenue. Now that the court has struck them down, what’s next?

Ahead of the Supreme Court's landmark 6-3 ruling on Friday (Feb 20), Donald Trump told reporters that without tariffs, “the whole country would be bankrupt." The US president and his economic team had voiced their opinion, stating that the apex court should leave the trade policy in place. Also, highlighting the vital role of tariffs in his foreign policy and its importance in revenue generation. Initially, US-prosposed 50% tariff had been levied on India, which came into effect at 9.30 AM on August 27. Left, right and centre, the Trump administration was out there slapping tariffs on countries exporting goods into America. India's oil trade with Russia had not gone down well with the US president. He had warned that an additional 25% tariff would be imposed. Essentially, the 50% would impact $48.2 billion worth of export merchandise. This is likely to impact the exports of garments, jewellery, gems, footwear, furniture and chemicals. In a draft order, the US Department of Homeland Security said, "The duties…are effective with respect to products of India that are entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 am Eastern Daylight Time on August 27." Also read: Donald Trump's tariff: What will happen to Apple's Made-in-India iPhone supply to US? The two countries later signed a bilateral trade agreement. Despite the apex court's ruling, Trump stated that "nothing changes" regarding the framework of the India-US deal. February 2, the nations had struck a deal to drop the rate to 18%. On August 25, the US delegation was to be in India, but that has been deferred. When Trump announced tariffs, he was unsparing as even in the world's remotest region – a place ruled by penguins, seals, and birds. Heard and McDonald Islands – the icy archipelago does not have a single human on the land, and the last time people visited is believed to be about a decade ago.

On the eve of a landmark Supreme Court ruling, President Trump warned that the US "would be bankrupt" without tariff revenue. Now that the court has struck them down, what’s next?

Without tariffs US 'would be bankrupt': Trump ahead of Supreme Court ruling

As the Trump administration still grappled with the fallout from the Epstein file release, Friday (Feb 20) appeared particularly tough for the Trump presidency, which dealt a triple blow during the day. The most significant comes from the United States Supreme Court, which ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs."&nbsp;Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda.&nbsp;The second setback came on economic polices, as the government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent.&nbsp;Full-year GDP growth came in at 2.2 per cent in 2025, lower than the 2.8 per cent figure for the prior year.&nbsp;Trump, who often touts himself as the best president in US history in terms of managning economy, blamed Democrats for the faltering growth.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-donald-trump-s-global-tariffs-1771601310479">US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs</a> "The Democrat Shutdown cost the U.S.A. at least two points in GDP," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post, about a half-hour before the official results were published.&nbsp;He also pointed the finger again at the Federal Reserve, bashing outgoing Chairman Jerome Powell and calling for "LOWER INTEREST RATES."&nbsp;The third hit comes in terms of the US president's approval rating, which plummeted to its lowest in his second term after nearly 13 months in the White House.&nbsp;According to Reuters/Ipsos polls, Trump's overall approval rating in the four-day poll is reported to be 38%. The president was previously reported to be at 39% in January, which was a drastic decline from the 50% highpoint shortly after his 2025 inauguration. A new ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll showed that a majority 58% said Trump was going "too far" with deportations of undocumented immigrants, which was an increase from the 50% reported in October. Only 12% of respondents claimed the president was "not going far enough", and 28% said he is “handling it about right.”

The government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent.

As the Trump administration still grappled with the fallout from the Epstein file release, Friday (Feb 20) appeared particularly tough for the Trump presidency, which dealt a triple blow during the day. The most significant comes from the United States Supreme Court, which ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda. The second setback came on economic polices, as the government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent. Full-year GDP growth came in at 2.2 per cent in 2025, lower than the 2.8 per cent figure for the prior year. Trump, who often touts himself as the best president in US history in terms of managning economy, blamed Democrats for the faltering growth. Also Read: US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs "The Democrat Shutdown cost the U.S.A. at least two points in GDP," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post, about a half-hour before the official results were published. He also pointed the finger again at the Federal Reserve, bashing outgoing Chairman Jerome Powell and calling for "LOWER INTEREST RATES." The third hit comes in terms of the US president's approval rating, which plummeted to its lowest in his second term after nearly 13 months in the White House. According to Reuters/Ipsos polls, Trump's overall approval rating in the four-day poll is reported to be 38%. The president was previously reported to be at 39% in January, which was a drastic decline from the 50% highpoint shortly after his 2025 inauguration. A new ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll showed that a majority 58% said Trump was going "too far" with deportations of undocumented immigrants, which was an increase from the 50% reported in October. Only 12% of respondents claimed the president was "not going far enough", and 28% said he is “handling it about right.”

The government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent.

Tough day for Trump administration as US president dealt triple blow

Democratic lawmakers rejoiced after the US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by imposing steep tariffs on global imports, toppling one of the president’s most aggressive assertions of executive power. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) hailed the Supreme Court’s ruling as a victory for Americans and the US economy.&nbsp;&nbsp;“This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer,” Schumer said in a statement. “Trump’s chaotic and illegal tariff tax made life more expensive and our economy more unstable. Families paid more. Small businesses and farmers got squeezed. Markets swung wildly.”&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-stocks-rise-after-supreme-court-rules-against-trump-s-sweeping-tariffs-1771603853424">US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs</a><h2>‘End this reckless trade war for good’</h2>&nbsp;“We’ve said from day one: a president cannot ignore Congress and unilaterally slap tariffs on Americans. That overreach failed,” he continued. “Now Trump should end this reckless trade war for good and finally give families and small businesses the relief they deserve.”&nbsp;The House Democratic whip, Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, said the verdict was a win for the American people.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;“Trump’s tariffs are an illegal tax on working families—hiking costs on everything from groceries to utility bills,” she wrote on social media. “Democrats will keep fighting to make your life more affordable.”&nbsp;<h2>‘Ruling a step in righting the wrongs’&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. “Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs,” he said, adding that the ruling was “a step in righting these wrongs, but we have so much more to go”.&nbsp;Colorado representative Joe Neguse, whose congressional litigation task force had pursued the challenge from district courts all the way to the Supreme Court and which focuses on curbing Trump’s executive actions, called it a “vindication”.&nbsp;“Our Litigation Task Force fought against President Trump’s unlawful and reckless tariffs every step of the way,” he said. “Today’s ruling is a victory for the American people.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-victory-for-americans-and-us-economy-democrats-rejoice-over-scotus-ruling-against-trump-s-tariffs-1771608358859">‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs</a>&nbsp;Pete Aguilar, the California representative and a senior member of Democratic leadership, said the ruling affirmed what his party had argued for months. “This is a major victory for the American people who have been suffering from sky-high prices,” he said. “Democrats will keep fighting to lower costs and hold Trump accountable.”&nbsp;<h2>Trump critics among Republicans also hail verdict</h2>

The ruling was also hailed by Trump critics among the Republicans. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said the verdict would prevent any future president from using emergency powers to enact sweeping economic policy unilaterally.&nbsp;Representative Henry Cuellar of Texas, whose southern district is dependent on cross-border trade, said the ruling reaffirmed that “Congress has the authority over tariffs and taxation”, and said that strong trade policy did not require “raising costs on everyday goods and materials.”The Nevada representative Susie Lee said the tariffs had taken “a wrecking ball to southern Nevada’s tourism economy”.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-diversifying-energy-options-will-buy-venezuela-oil-says-us-ambassador-sergio-gor-1771597691150">India ‘diversifying’ energy options, will buy Venezuela oil, says US ambassador Sergio Gor</a>&nbsp;Representative Tom Suozzi of New York said the ruling carried a message beyond the immediate economic impact.&nbsp;“It is a clear message that the president cannot act unilaterally and must negotiate and try and find common ground with the co-equal branch of government: the Congress.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/canadian-govt-asks-court-to-block-sensitive-info-in-nijjar-case-as-it-may-harm-international-relations-1771588403457">Canadian govt asks court to block sensitive info in Nijjar case as it may harm international relations</a><h2>Trump calls ruling a ‘disgrace’</h2>&nbsp;Trump, meanwhile, was unrepentant. Speaking during a White House breakfast with governors on Friday morning, the president reportedly called the ruling a “disgrace” and told those gathered that he had a backup plan, though he offered no details.

Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey, who is a progressive Democrat, expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs, he said, adding that the ruling was a step in righting the wrongs,

Democratic lawmakers rejoiced after the US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by imposing steep tariffs on global imports, toppling one of the president’s most aggressive assertions of executive power. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) hailed the Supreme Court’s ruling as a victory for Americans and the US economy. “This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer,” Schumer said in a statement. “Trump’s chaotic and illegal tariff tax made life more expensive and our economy more unstable. Families paid more. Small businesses and farmers got squeezed. Markets swung wildly.” Also Read: US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs ‘End this reckless trade war for good’ “We’ve said from day one: a president cannot ignore Congress and unilaterally slap tariffs on Americans. That overreach failed,” he continued. “Now Trump should end this reckless trade war for good and finally give families and small businesses the relief they deserve.” The House Democratic whip, Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, said the verdict was a win for the American people. Also Read: US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options “Trump’s tariffs are an illegal tax on working families—hiking costs on everything from groceries to utility bills,” she wrote on social media. “Democrats will keep fighting to make your life more affordable.” ‘Ruling a step in righting the wrongs’ Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. “Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs,” he said, adding that the ruling was “a step in righting these wrongs, but we have so much more to go”. Colorado representative Joe Neguse, whose congressional litigation task force had pursued the challenge from district courts all the way to the Supreme Court and which focuses on curbing Trump’s executive actions, called it a “vindication”. “Our Litigation Task Force fought against President Trump’s unlawful and reckless tariffs every step of the way,” he said. “Today’s ruling is a victory for the American people.” Also Read: ‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs Pete Aguilar, the California representative and a senior member of Democratic leadership, said the ruling affirmed what his party had argued for months. “This is a major victory for the American people who have been suffering from sky-high prices,” he said. “Democrats will keep fighting to lower costs and hold Trump accountable.” Trump critics among Republicans also hail verdict

Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey, who is a progressive Democrat, expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs, he said, adding that the ruling was a step in righting the wrongs,

‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs

The second edition of the Indo-Nepal Trade Festival opened in New Delhi on Friday, aiming to deepen economic ties, boost tourism and cultural exchanges between the two close neighbours. Held from 20-22 February at the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry building in Hauz Khas, the event is organised by the Everest Chamber of Commerce and Industries (ECCI), an umbrella body of Nepali entrepreneurs in India, in partnership with the Embassy of Nepal, the Nepal Tourism Board and the Trade and Export Promotion Centre.&nbsp;The festival, under the theme “Connecting People, Enhancing Bilateral Trade”, was inaugurated by Nepal's Ambassador to India, Shankar Prasad&nbsp;Sharma, and Munu Mahawar, Additional Secretary in India's Ministry of External Affairs (North Division).&nbsp;Building on its inaugural edition, this year's gathering features more than ten high-level sessions and policy dialogues involving over 60 experts from both countries.Discussions will cover key areas including hydropower and energy cooperation, cross-border trade and connectivity, tourism integration along the Ramayana and Buddhist Circuits, banking, fintech and digital economy collaboration, media and cultural diplomacy, youth engagement, education, innovation, the startup ecosystem, and a broader “Vision 2030” for Indo-Nepal cooperation.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-donald-trump-s-global-tariffs-1771601310479">US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs</a>

Business networking, B2B, and B2G meetings will bring together policymakers, ministers, diplomats, industrialists, investors and entrepreneurs to explore new opportunities for shared growth and sustainable regional development.&nbsp;Alongside policy and commerce, the festival showcases Nepal's cultural heritage through musical performances, film screenings, including the documentary 'Gurkha Warriors' on day one, traditional arts and authentic Nepali cuisine.&nbsp;Speaking at a press conference at the Press Club of India on Tuesday, ECCI President Yubaraj Baral described the event as a “transformative platform”.&nbsp;“The festival will further support the expansion of investment opportunities, foster meaningful partnerships across various sectors between Nepal and India, and deepen the historic friendship between the two nations,” Mr Baral said. “This landmark bilateral event will further reinforce India-Nepal economic diplomacy and promote long-term regional cooperation.”&nbsp;Organisers say the initiative addresses the need to expand trade and reduce imbalances, while promoting people-to-people contacts rooted in shared history, open borders and cultural affinities. The three-day event is expected to serve as a key platform for advancing bilateral economic diplomacy amid ongoing efforts to strengthen connectivity and mutual prosperity.

Business networking, B2B, and B2G meetings will bring together policymakers, ministers, diplomats, industrialists, investors and entrepreneurs to explore new opportunities for shared growth and sustainable regional development.

The second edition of the Indo-Nepal Trade Festival opened in New Delhi on Friday, aiming to deepen economic ties, boost tourism and cultural exchanges between the two close neighbours. Held from 20-22 February at the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry building in Hauz Khas, the event is organised by the Everest Chamber of Commerce and Industries (ECCI), an umbrella body of Nepali entrepreneurs in India, in partnership with the Embassy of Nepal, the Nepal Tourism Board and the Trade and Export Promotion Centre. The festival, under the theme “Connecting People, Enhancing Bilateral Trade”, was inaugurated by Nepal's Ambassador to India, Shankar Prasad Sharma, and Munu Mahawar, Additional Secretary in India's Ministry of External Affairs (North Division). Building on its inaugural edition, this year's gathering features more than ten high-level sessions and policy dialogues involving over 60 experts from both countries. Discussions will cover key areas including hydropower and energy cooperation, cross-border trade and connectivity, tourism integration along the Ramayana and Buddhist Circuits, banking, fintech and digital economy collaboration, media and cultural diplomacy, youth engagement, education, innovation, the startup ecosystem, and a broader “Vision 2030” for Indo-Nepal cooperation. Also Read: US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs

Business networking, B2B, and B2G meetings will bring together policymakers, ministers, diplomats, industrialists, investors and entrepreneurs to explore new opportunities for shared growth and sustainable regional development.

Delhi hosts Indo-Nepal Trade Festival to boost trade, tourism and cultural links

On Friday (Feb 20), Donald Trump said he is “considering” a limited military strike on Iran if a deal is not reached. This comes after the second round of talks in Geneva, where the deal wasn’t finalised but a technical breakthrough was reached. Iran is not willing to agree to Washington’s demand of zero uranium enrichment; the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, said, "Nuclear energy is our undeniable right.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-trump-s-first-reaction-on-tariff-ruling-calls-supreme-court-s-ruling-a-disgrace-1771605853085/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-trump-s-first-reaction-on-tariff-ruling-calls-supreme-court-s-ruling-a-disgrace-1771605853085/embed</a>&nbsp; In response to a reporter’s question about whether he is considering a limited military strike if Iran doesn't make a deal. To which the US president said, “The most I can say - I am considering it.” &nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Reporter: Are you considering a limited military strike if Iran doesn’t make a deal? Donald Trump: The most I can say - I am considering it <a href="https://t.co/MnkalT9CZf">pic.twitter.com/MnkalT9CZf</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/2024881050389004363?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Post the meeting mediated by Oman, Trump had issued warning to the Iranian regime stating that 10 to 15 days is the “absolute maximum” time for the country to reach an agreement. The comments came as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva that "a new window of opportunity has opened, under which we had the second round of the negotiations with the United States in Geneva". Iran's top diplomat voiced hope, saying "a new window of opportunity" seen in fresh nuclear talks with Washington would lead to a lasting solution to the two countries' standoff.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-you-will-fail-too-khamenei-mocks-trump-for-claims-of-47-years-of-inability-to-eliminate-iran-1771330555834">‘You will fail too’: Khamenei mocks Trump for claims of 47 years of inability to eliminate Iran</a>&nbsp;And as the second round was underway, Supreme leader Ali Khamenei has highlighted America’s rhetoric; he said “The US President keeps saying that they have the strongest military force in the world.” This comment comes after Trump’s threats that Iran will have to face consequences if the deal doesn’t fall through.&nbsp;To which Khamenei responded, “The strongest military force in the world may at times be struck so hard that it cannot get up again. They keep saying we have sent aircraft carriers toward Iran. Very well… an aircraft carrier is indeed a dangerous asset, but more dangerous than the carrier is the weapon that can send this carrier to the bottom of the sea.”

President Trump confirms he is considering a limited military strike on Iran to force a nuclear deal. With a 10-day deadline looming, will Geneva diplomacy succeed?

On Friday (Feb 20), Donald Trump said he is “considering” a limited military strike on Iran if a deal is not reached. This comes after the second round of talks in Geneva, where the deal wasn’t finalised but a technical breakthrough was reached. Iran is not willing to agree to Washington’s demand of zero uranium enrichment; the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, said, "Nuclear energy is our undeniable right.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-trump-s-first-reaction-on-tariff-ruling-calls-supreme-court-s-ruling-a-disgrace-1771605853085/embed In response to a reporter’s question about whether he is considering a limited military strike if Iran doesn't make a deal. To which the US president said, “The most I can say - I am considering it.”

President Trump confirms he is considering a limited military strike on Iran to force a nuclear deal. With a 10-day deadline looming, will Geneva diplomacy succeed?

Donald Trump 'considers' limited military strike if Iran doesn’t make a nuclear deal

Trump said he is considering a limited strike on Iran as USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Gerald R. Ford, along with destroyers and advanced aircraft, move toward the Middle East.

Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East

US stocks mostly rose on Friday, as Wall Street’s main stock indexes jumped after the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. The top court has voided Trump’s ⁠global ⁠tariffs since they were enacted under a federal law meant for national emergencies. The Supreme Court said Trump exceeded his powers by imposing duties without a clear Congressional authorisation.&nbsp;The six-three decision by the court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies like Nike and Abercrombie &amp; Fitch. The dollar slipped, and Treasury yields edged higher, said a WSJ report.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-donald-trump-s-global-tariffs-1771601310479">US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs</a>&nbsp;Soon after the news trickled in, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 207.03 points, or 0.42%, to 49,602.19, the S&amp;P 500 gained 33.44 points, or 0.52%, to 6,895.33 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 153.93 points, or 0.68%, to 22,836.66.&nbsp;European auto shares and US-listed shares of stock markets from South Korea to India rallied.&nbsp;The yields on US Treasury bonds also jumped across maturities. Yields on the 10-year bond, which mortgage rates often track closely, rose to 4.096%, while the 30-year Treasury yield rose to 4.74%.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;The U.S. dollar jumped against other currencies, such as the British pound, Euro, and Japan's yen, a signal that investors are taking the court decision favourably.&nbsp;Trump imposed the levies in February 2005 under the 1977 economic sanctions law meant to be used only during national emergencies. His April 2 “Liberation Day” tariffs included a ⁠baseline duty of 10% on all imports to the US and specific additional tariffs ⁠of 15% to 50% on most countries, many of which were later renegotiated and lowered.&nbsp;Thousands of companies around the world have filed lawsuits challenging the sweeping tariffs and sought refunds on duties they have paid.

The six-three decision by the US Supreme Court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies. The dollar slipped, while Treasury yields edged higher.

US stocks mostly rose on Friday, as Wall Street’s main stock indexes jumped after the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. The top court has voided Trump’s ⁠global ⁠tariffs since they were enacted under a federal law meant for national emergencies. The Supreme Court said Trump exceeded his powers by imposing duties without a clear Congressional authorisation. The six-three decision by the court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies like Nike and Abercrombie & Fitch. The dollar slipped, and Treasury yields edged higher, said a WSJ report. Also Read: US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs Soon after the news trickled in, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 207.03 points, or 0.42%, to 49,602.19, the S&P 500 gained 33.44 points, or 0.52%, to 6,895.33 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 153.93 points, or 0.68%, to 22,836.66. European auto shares and US-listed shares of stock markets from South Korea to India rallied. The yields on US Treasury bonds also jumped across maturities. Yields on the 10-year bond, which mortgage rates often track closely, rose to 4.096%, while the 30-year Treasury yield rose to 4.74%. Also Read: US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options The U.S. dollar jumped against other currencies, such as the British pound, Euro, and Japan's yen, a signal that investors are taking the court decision favourably. Trump imposed the levies in February 2005 under the 1977 economic sanctions law meant to be used only during national emergencies. His April 2 “Liberation Day” tariffs included a ⁠baseline duty of 10% on all imports to the US and specific additional tariffs ⁠of 15% to 50% on most countries, many of which were later renegotiated and lowered. Thousands of companies around the world have filed lawsuits challenging the sweeping tariffs and sought refunds on duties they have paid.

The six-three decision by the US Supreme Court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies. The dollar slipped, while Treasury yields edged higher.

US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs

Austria's State Secretary for Digitalisation and e-Governance, Alexander Pröll, has expressed strong optimism about deepening ties with India, following his attendance at the AI Impact Summit hosted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi.&nbsp;&nbsp;Speaking to the media in Delhi, Mr Pröll highlighted the productive discussions on leveraging artificial intelligence for public services. "I visited the AI impact summit hosted by Prime Minister Modi, and we had very good conversations on how we can use AI in public service for the people," he said. "And I think we are on a good way to cooperate. And what's most important for me is a good bilateral relationship between India and Austria."&nbsp;Mr Pröll, who was sworn in as State Secretary at the Austrian Federal Chancellery on 3 March 2025, leads efforts in digital transformation, technological innovation, and public sector modernisation. His responsibilities include coordinating national digital initiatives, advancing digital identity frameworks, and promoting responsible use of emerging technologies.&nbsp;The Austrian official also praised Prime Minister Modi personally. "PM Modi is a visionary. He's a very good guy, and we love him so much in Austria, and it was amazing to see him, to visit him at the AI Impact Summit," he added. Mr Pröll extended an invitation to Indian talent, emphasising educational collaboration. "We're inviting all skilled students from India to come to Austria, to Vienna, to visit our perfect technical universities. And we want to work together with academia, with businesses and with the Government of India," he stated.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-donald-trump-s-global-tariffs-1771601310479">US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs</a>&nbsp;On the economic front, he welcomed the recent landmark free trade agreement between the European Union and India, concluded in January 2026 after nearly two decades of negotiations. Describing it as a major milestone, he said: "The free trade agreement concluded between the European Union and Austria, and, of course, India. It's the mother of all deals. What we see is that it's a win-win situation between India and the European Union. We are working closely together, and I think that's the right way to go. About 25% of the GDP is working with the free trade agreement, and what we see is a win-win situation. Economic growth is happening."&nbsp;The agreement, often called the "mother of all deals," is projected to boost trade significantly, covering a combined population of around two billion people and nearly a quarter of global GDP, with tariff reductions on the vast majority of goods.&nbsp;&nbsp;Mr Pröll's comments come amid Austria's active role in European digital policy. In 2025, he spearheaded a continent-wide initiative resulting in all 27 EU Member States signing a declaration on digital sovereignty at a Berlin summit in November. The non-binding declaration commits to reducing strategic dependencies, enhancing technological capabilities, and fostering an open yet resilient digital ecosystem.

The agreement, often called the "mother of all deals," is projected to boost trade significantly, covering a combined population of around two billion people and nearly a quarter of global GDP, with tariff reductions on the vast majority of goods. 

Austria's State Secretary for Digitalisation and e-Governance, Alexander Pröll, has expressed strong optimism about deepening ties with India, following his attendance at the AI Impact Summit hosted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi. Speaking to the media in Delhi, Mr Pröll highlighted the productive discussions on leveraging artificial intelligence for public services. "I visited the AI impact summit hosted by Prime Minister Modi, and we had very good conversations on how we can use AI in public service for the people," he said. "And I think we are on a good way to cooperate. And what's most important for me is a good bilateral relationship between India and Austria." Mr Pröll, who was sworn in as State Secretary at the Austrian Federal Chancellery on 3 March 2025, leads efforts in digital transformation, technological innovation, and public sector modernisation. His responsibilities include coordinating national digital initiatives, advancing digital identity frameworks, and promoting responsible use of emerging technologies. The Austrian official also praised Prime Minister Modi personally. "PM Modi is a visionary. He's a very good guy, and we love him so much in Austria, and it was amazing to see him, to visit him at the AI Impact Summit," he added. Mr Pröll extended an invitation to Indian talent, emphasising educational collaboration. "We're inviting all skilled students from India to come to Austria, to Vienna, to visit our perfect technical universities. And we want to work together with academia, with businesses and with the Government of India," he stated. Also Read: US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs On the economic front, he welcomed the recent landmark free trade agreement between the European Union and India, concluded in January 2026 after nearly two decades of negotiations. Describing it as a major milestone, he said: "The free trade agreement concluded between the European Union and Austria, and, of course, India. It's the mother of all deals. What we see is that it's a win-win situation between India and the European Union. We are working closely together, and I think that's the right way to go. About 25% of the GDP is working with the free trade agreement, and what we see is a win-win situation. Economic growth is happening." The agreement, often called the "mother of all deals," is projected to boost trade significantly, covering a combined population of around two billion people and nearly a quarter of global GDP, with tariff reductions on the vast majority of goods. Mr Pröll's comments come amid Austria's active role in European digital policy. In 2025, he spearheaded a continent-wide initiative resulting in all 27 EU Member States signing a declaration on digital sovereignty at a Berlin summit in November. The non-binding declaration commits to reducing strategic dependencies, enhancing technological capabilities, and fostering an open yet resilient digital ecosystem.

The agreement, often called the "mother of all deals," is projected to boost trade significantly, covering a combined population of around two billion people and nearly a quarter of global GDP, with tariff reductions on the vast majority of goods.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Austria hails 'mother of all deals' as EU-India trade pact boosts economic ties

The US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda.&nbsp;Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs."&nbsp;Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.&nbsp;“The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope," Roberts wrote. However, the Trump administration “points to no statute" in which Congress has previously said that the language in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) could apply to tariffs, he said&nbsp;“In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it," the Chief Justice remarked. He noted that any “extraordinary assertion" of such power requires “clear congressional authorisation", which Trump did not have.&nbsp;The court also pointed out that "had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs" with IEEPA, "it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes."&nbsp;Notably, the ruling does not apply to sector-specific levies that Donald Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods under different legal authorities. Trump has long used tariffs as a primary means of exercising power and achieving political goals, often describing them as “beautiful” and hailing duties as a way to solve major national problems, such as the widening trade deficit and rising debt.&nbsp;The US President even went to great lengths to use these levies as leverage, threatening long-standing partners Canada and Mexico with additional duties over policy disagreements. India has also been on the receiving end of Trump’s tariff wars; for months, New Delhi faced 50 per cent duties, among the highest in the world, before the two countries recently moved toward a new trade deal.&nbsp;On April 2, 2025, a date he famously proclaimed as "Liberation Day," President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 to launch the most aggressive trade policy in modern American history.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-us-to-start-interim-trade-talks-feb-23-in-us-likely-to-operationalise-by-april-1771597322925">India, US to hold talks from Feb 23 on sealing trade deal, signing soon after</a>&nbsp;Invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by declaring a national emergency over the US trade deficit, the administration imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on nearly all global imports. This framework also introduced "reciprocal" duties reaching as high as 50% for major trading partners, aiming to counteract foreign trade barriers and revitalise domestic manufacturing.

The ruling does not impact sector-specific duties that Trump has separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods.

The US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda. Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. “The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope," Roberts wrote. However, the Trump administration “points to no statute" in which Congress has previously said that the language in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) could apply to tariffs, he said “In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it," the Chief Justice remarked. He noted that any “extraordinary assertion" of such power requires “clear congressional authorisation", which Trump did not have. The court also pointed out that "had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs" with IEEPA, "it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes." Notably, the ruling does not apply to sector-specific levies that Donald Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods under different legal authorities. Trump has long used tariffs as a primary means of exercising power and achieving political goals, often describing them as “beautiful” and hailing duties as a way to solve major national problems, such as the widening trade deficit and rising debt. The US President even went to great lengths to use these levies as leverage, threatening long-standing partners Canada and Mexico with additional duties over policy disagreements. India has also been on the receiving end of Trump’s tariff wars; for months, New Delhi faced 50 per cent duties, among the highest in the world, before the two countries recently moved toward a new trade deal. On April 2, 2025, a date he famously proclaimed as "Liberation Day," President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 to launch the most aggressive trade policy in modern American history. Also Read: India, US to hold talks from Feb 23 on sealing trade deal, signing soon after Invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by declaring a national emergency over the US trade deficit, the administration imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on nearly all global imports. This framework also introduced "reciprocal" duties reaching as high as 50% for major trading partners, aiming to counteract foreign trade barriers and revitalise domestic manufacturing.

The ruling does not impact sector-specific duties that Trump has separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods.

US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs

In a landmark judgment on Friday (Feb 20), the US Supreme Court ruled that the President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing a swath of tariffs that upended global trade. The court said in the verdict that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act “does not authorise the President to impose tariffs.”&nbsp;“The United States, after all, is not at war with every nation in the world,” the US Chief Justice said while addressing the scope of executive powers in the case. After this, Trump said he has a “backup plan” for tariffs. Let's explore the possible options the American president may consider now.&nbsp;Section 232: National Security Tariffs&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-to-attack-iran-soon-from-usss-abraham-lincoln-to-gerald-ford-us-deploys-these-warships-are-heading-towards-middle-east-nuclear-deal-1771605910151">Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East</a>&nbsp;Section 232 of the US Constitution allows tariffs if imports threaten national security. This was previously used for steel and aluminium duties. However, it requires industry-specific investigations. Hence, this section cannot justify sweeping global tariffs.&nbsp;Section 301: Unfair Trade Practices&nbsp;Under Section 301, the US can impose tariffs in response to discriminatory or unfair trade behaviour by other countries. This tool was heavily used during earlier trade disputes, especially involving China.&nbsp;Section 201: Safeguard Measures&nbsp;This section allows temporary protection for domestic industries harmed by sudden import surges. These tariffs are time-limited and must meet strict injury standards.&nbsp;Section 122: Balance-of-Payments Authority&nbsp;Section 122 of the Constitution permits temporary surcharges (usually capped at 15 per cent) to address serious balance-of-payments problems. It is narrower and more constrained than the emergency powers Trump attempted to use.<h2>What did the court say?</h2>Chief Justice John Roberts said, "The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it.”&nbsp;

The US Supreme Court ruled Trump exceeded authority in imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers, forcing reliance on narrower trade laws like Sections 232, 301, 201, or 122.

In a landmark judgment on Friday (Feb 20), the US Supreme Court ruled that the President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing a swath of tariffs that upended global trade. The court said in the verdict that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act “does not authorise the President to impose tariffs.” “The United States, after all, is not at war with every nation in the world,” the US Chief Justice said while addressing the scope of executive powers in the case. After this, Trump said he has a “backup plan” for tariffs. Let's explore the possible options the American president may consider now. Section 232: National Security Tariffs Also read: Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East Section 232 of the US Constitution allows tariffs if imports threaten national security. This was previously used for steel and aluminium duties. However, it requires industry-specific investigations. Hence, this section cannot justify sweeping global tariffs. Section 301: Unfair Trade Practices Under Section 301, the US can impose tariffs in response to discriminatory or unfair trade behaviour by other countries. This tool was heavily used during earlier trade disputes, especially involving China. Section 201: Safeguard Measures This section allows temporary protection for domestic industries harmed by sudden import surges. These tariffs are time-limited and must meet strict injury standards. Section 122: Balance-of-Payments Authority Section 122 of the Constitution permits temporary surcharges (usually capped at 15 per cent) to address serious balance-of-payments problems. It is narrower and more constrained than the emergency powers Trump attempted to use. What did the court say? Chief Justice John Roberts said, "The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it.”

The US Supreme Court ruled Trump exceeded authority in imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers, forcing reliance on narrower trade laws like Sections 232, 301, 201, or 122.

US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options

Russia has developed a new class of photocatalysts which is capable of purifying water using visible sunlight. The method was created by scientists working at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT), marking a breakthrough that could significantly advance sustainable water treatment, according to the official website of the institute.&nbsp;The study, done by experts from MIPT's Centre for Photonics and Two-Dimensional Materials in collaboration with international scientists, identified an optimal material structure for high photocatalytic efficiency under visible light, as reported by TV BRICS.&nbsp;Photocatalysis is considered a promising method for removing organic pollutants such as dyes, pharmaceutical residues, pesticides and oil traces from water. Most existing photocatalysts, however, rely mainly on ultraviolet light, which makes up nearly 5 per cent of the solar spectrum. By contrast, visible light accounts for nearly half of solar radiation, making its use crucial for scalable and sustainable purification technologies, &nbsp;according to TV BRICS.<h3>What others method scientists use?</h3>To address this limitation, scientists used femtosecond laser ablation in liquids, a method that involves ultra-short, high-energy laser pulses to vaporise a material's surfaces. The resulting vapour condenses into nanoparticles with tailored electronic characteristics. Crucially, this technique produces stable, water-based colloidal solutions without the need for surfactants, making the process both clean and environmentally friendly.&nbsp;The scientists studied two niobium-based materials: niobium pentoxide (Nb₂O₅) and lithium niobate (LiNbO₃). Laser treatment affected them in distinct ways. Nb₂O₅ lost its crystalline order and became fully amorphous, whereas the more thermodynamically stable LiNbO₃ retained its crystal structure while developing controlled point defects.&nbsp;Amorphous materials typically cause rapid recombination of light-generated charge carriers, limiting efficiency. In contrast, engineered defects within crystalline materials improve visible-light absorption and prolong charge-carrier lifetimes, allowing the formation of reactive species that more effectively degrade pollutants.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/nasa-boeing-starliner-mishap-challenger-columbia-sunita-williams-1771557827933">NASA admits capsule that took Sunita Williams to space avoided major tragedy: Lethality risk similar to Columbia</a>

The study, done by experts from MIPT's Centre for Photonics and Two-Dimensional Materials in collaboration with international scientists, identified an optimal material structure for high photocatalytic efficiency under visible light.

Russia has developed a new class of photocatalysts which is capable of purifying water using visible sunlight. The method was created by scientists working at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT), marking a breakthrough that could significantly advance sustainable water treatment, according to the official website of the institute. The study, done by experts from MIPT's Centre for Photonics and Two-Dimensional Materials in collaboration with international scientists, identified an optimal material structure for high photocatalytic efficiency under visible light, as reported by TV BRICS. Photocatalysis is considered a promising method for removing organic pollutants such as dyes, pharmaceutical residues, pesticides and oil traces from water. Most existing photocatalysts, however, rely mainly on ultraviolet light, which makes up nearly 5 per cent of the solar spectrum. By contrast, visible light accounts for nearly half of solar radiation, making its use crucial for scalable and sustainable purification technologies, according to TV BRICS. What others method scientists use? To address this limitation, scientists used femtosecond laser ablation in liquids, a method that involves ultra-short, high-energy laser pulses to vaporise a material's surfaces. The resulting vapour condenses into nanoparticles with tailored electronic characteristics. Crucially, this technique produces stable, water-based colloidal solutions without the need for surfactants, making the process both clean and environmentally friendly. The scientists studied two niobium-based materials: niobium pentoxide (Nb₂O₅) and lithium niobate (LiNbO₃). Laser treatment affected them in distinct ways. Nb₂O₅ lost its crystalline order and became fully amorphous, whereas the more thermodynamically stable LiNbO₃ retained its crystal structure while developing controlled point defects. Amorphous materials typically cause rapid recombination of light-generated charge carriers, limiting efficiency. In contrast, engineered defects within crystalline materials improve visible-light absorption and prolong charge-carrier lifetimes, allowing the formation of reactive species that more effectively degrade pollutants. Also read: NASA admits capsule that took Sunita Williams to space avoided major tragedy: Lethality risk similar to Columbia

The study, done by experts from MIPT's Centre for Photonics and Two-Dimensional Materials in collaboration with international scientists, identified an optimal material structure for high photocatalytic efficiency under visible light.

Russian scientists develop high-efficiency solar catalysts that clean water using sunlight

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein detail years of alleged sexual abuse, coercion and manipulation, saying promises of mentorship masked exploitation and his death denied many victims their chance for justice.

‘I was trapped’: Epstein survivors recall horrific details of his years of abuse, manipulation

India and the United States will convene a three-day meeting in the US on February 23 to conclude the legal text for their proposed trade deal. This comes after both sides adopted a framework on the same earlier this month, following months of diplomatic deadlock over the trade deal and the US president's punitive tariffs against New Delhi.&nbsp;According to a PTI report citing an official, the joint statement signed by the two countries had outlined the contours of the deal. The focus now shifts to translating the agreed-upon framework into a formal legal agreement. The pact is expected to be signed in March. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on Friday said that the deal with the United States is likely to come into effect in April this year. The Free Trade Agreement (FTAs) with Uk and Oman are also expected to be operational in the same month, he added.&nbsp;Earlier today, in a press conference on the sidelines of the Global AI Impact Summit, US Ambassador Sergio Gor said the signing of the deal will happen sonner then later.&nbsp; "The signing will happen very soon. In fact, even this week, both teams are talking to each other and actively getting to a place where both will be able to sign. We're not dealing with a small country; this is one of the biggest economies. And so we're thrilled that the interim deal is done. You have a few tweaking points that are left to do, but it's done. So the signing will happen sooner than later, " Gor said.&nbsp;Moreover, the Ministry of External Affairs Randhir Jaiswal on Friday confirmed that both countries are moving ahead in line with the joint statement adopted on February 7.&nbsp;"We have adopted the joint statement between India and the US recently. As per the joint statement, both sides are working to finalize mutually beneficial trade agreement. A team from our side lead by the chief negotiator, is expected to head to the US next week," Jaiswal said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ukraine-to-boycott-paralympic-opening-ceremony-over-russian-flag-return-1771591292946">Ukraine to boycott Paralympic opening ceremony over Russian flag return</a>&nbsp;In a landmark development on February 7, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump announced finalisation of a framework for an interim trade agreement, slashing the tariffs on Indian goods from punitive 50 per cent to a reciprocal 18 per cent tariffs.&nbsp;Following the announcement, Goyal said that the day will be etched in history with golden letters as "A $30 trillion economy is now open to our exporters. This joint statement gives every Indian citizen an opportunity for new hope, enthusiasm, and new resolutions. The 50 per cent tariff that Indian exporters faced will now be only 18 per cent. We will have the lowest tariffs compared to our neighbouring countries. Exporters of gems and pharmaceuticals will face zero duty in the US," he said.

Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on Friday said that the deal with the United States is likely to come into effect in April this year.

India and the United States will convene a three-day meeting in the US on February 23 to conclude the legal text for their proposed trade deal. This comes after both sides adopted a framework on the same earlier this month, following months of diplomatic deadlock over the trade deal and the US president's punitive tariffs against New Delhi. According to a PTI report citing an official, the joint statement signed by the two countries had outlined the contours of the deal. The focus now shifts to translating the agreed-upon framework into a formal legal agreement. The pact is expected to be signed in March. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on Friday said that the deal with the United States is likely to come into effect in April this year. The Free Trade Agreement (FTAs) with Uk and Oman are also expected to be operational in the same month, he added. Earlier today, in a press conference on the sidelines of the Global AI Impact Summit, US Ambassador Sergio Gor said the signing of the deal will happen sonner then later. "The signing will happen very soon. In fact, even this week, both teams are talking to each other and actively getting to a place where both will be able to sign. We're not dealing with a small country; this is one of the biggest economies. And so we're thrilled that the interim deal is done. You have a few tweaking points that are left to do, but it's done. So the signing will happen sooner than later, " Gor said. Moreover, the Ministry of External Affairs Randhir Jaiswal on Friday confirmed that both countries are moving ahead in line with the joint statement adopted on February 7. "We have adopted the joint statement between India and the US recently. As per the joint statement, both sides are working to finalize mutually beneficial trade agreement. A team from our side lead by the chief negotiator, is expected to head to the US next week," Jaiswal said. Also Read: Ukraine to boycott Paralympic opening ceremony over Russian flag return In a landmark development on February 7, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump announced finalisation of a framework for an interim trade agreement, slashing the tariffs on Indian goods from punitive 50 per cent to a reciprocal 18 per cent tariffs. Following the announcement, Goyal said that the day will be etched in history with golden letters as "A $30 trillion economy is now open to our exporters. This joint statement gives every Indian citizen an opportunity for new hope, enthusiasm, and new resolutions. The 50 per cent tariff that Indian exporters faced will now be only 18 per cent. We will have the lowest tariffs compared to our neighbouring countries. Exporters of gems and pharmaceuticals will face zero duty in the US," he said.

Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on Friday said that the deal with the United States is likely to come into effect in April this year.

India, US to hold talks from Feb 23 on sealing trade deal, signing soon after

The Defence Acquisition Council, chaired by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) for capital acquisition proposals worth approximately Rs 3.60 lakh crore to buy 114 Rafale fighter jets from France for the Indian Air Force (IAF). The proposal also includes six P-8I long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft from the United States for the Indian Navy.&nbsp;Out of 114 Rafale fighter jets, 18 will be delivered by Dassault Aviation in fly-away condition from France, while the other 96 jets will be manufactured domestically under the "Make in India" initiative. The deal includes 88 single-seat and 26 twin-seat variants of the advanced Rafale F4 standard of the jets.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Indonesia also signed an order for 42 Rafale jets from France in February 2022, led by its Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto, with the company Dassault Aviation. The deal was divided into three tranches (6 + 18 +18), taking effect sequentially (February 2022, August 2023, January 2024).&nbsp;Interestingly, the Indonesian government signed a deal for 42 Rafale fighter jets worth $8.1 billion, nearly Rs 68,000 crore, putting the cost of each aircraft at roughly Rs 1,747. In comparison, India's agreement for 114 jets is valued at about Rs 3.25 lakh crore, which is nearly Rs 2,850 crore per jet, around 1.5 times more. Following the deal, which shows a sharp differences has fueled questions over India for paying more than Rs 1000 crore extra for each aircraft.&nbsp;WATCH: https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-files-probe-ex-prince-andrew-was-arrested-over-alleged-document-leak-1771594157145/embedd<h3>Why are Rafales costlier for India?</h3>If the Rafales' all components are compared between both countries, then the higher price reflects a much broader package. India’s deal includes advanced Meteor and SCALP missiles, HAMMER precision-guided bombs, full-mission simulators, long-term maintenance, spares, and technology transfer. In effect, India is paying for the aircraft’s entire life-cycle, making the overall deal more economical in the long run.&nbsp;This is also not India’s first Rafale purchase. The country earlier inducted 36 jets and later acquired the naval Rafale-M variant. Currently, the Air Force operates 36 Rafales, while the Navy has deployed 26 aircraft on INS Vikrant.&nbsp;Currently, the IAF has 29 fighter squadrons, but its assessed requirement stands at 42 squadrons with each squadron having 16-18 fighter jets. This new deal of Rafales will help India to close this gap and strengthen readiness across different regions.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/maharashtra-cm-devendra-fadnavis-wife-amruta-quits-bank-job-after-23-years-1771507722730">Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis’ wife Amruta quits bank job after 23 years</a>

Along with India, Indonesia signed an order for 42 Rafale jets from France in February 2022, led by its Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto, with the company Dassault Aviation. The deal was divided into three tranches (6 + 18 +18), taking effect sequentially (Feb 2022, Aug 2023, Jan 2024).

The Defence Acquisition Council, chaired by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) for capital acquisition proposals worth approximately Rs 3.60 lakh crore to buy 114 Rafale fighter jets from France for the Indian Air Force (IAF). The proposal also includes six P-8I long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft from the United States for the Indian Navy. Out of 114 Rafale fighter jets, 18 will be delivered by Dassault Aviation in fly-away condition from France, while the other 96 jets will be manufactured domestically under the "Make in India" initiative. The deal includes 88 single-seat and 26 twin-seat variants of the advanced Rafale F4 standard of the jets. Meanwhile, Indonesia also signed an order for 42 Rafale jets from France in February 2022, led by its Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto, with the company Dassault Aviation. The deal was divided into three tranches (6 + 18 +18), taking effect sequentially (February 2022, August 2023, January 2024). Interestingly, the Indonesian government signed a deal for 42 Rafale fighter jets worth $8.1 billion, nearly Rs 68,000 crore, putting the cost of each aircraft at roughly Rs 1,747. In comparison, India's agreement for 114 jets is valued at about Rs 3.25 lakh crore, which is nearly Rs 2,850 crore per jet, around 1.5 times more. Following the deal, which shows a sharp differences has fueled questions over India for paying more than Rs 1000 crore extra for each aircraft. WATCH: https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-files-probe-ex-prince-andrew-was-arrested-over-alleged-document-leak-1771594157145/embedd Why are Rafales costlier for India? If the Rafales' all components are compared between both countries, then the higher price reflects a much broader package. India’s deal includes advanced Meteor and SCALP missiles, HAMMER precision-guided bombs, full-mission simulators, long-term maintenance, spares, and technology transfer. In effect, India is paying for the aircraft’s entire life-cycle, making the overall deal more economical in the long run. This is also not India’s first Rafale purchase. The country earlier inducted 36 jets and later acquired the naval Rafale-M variant. Currently, the Air Force operates 36 Rafales, while the Navy has deployed 26 aircraft on INS Vikrant. Currently, the IAF has 29 fighter squadrons, but its assessed requirement stands at 42 squadrons with each squadron having 16-18 fighter jets. This new deal of Rafales will help India to close this gap and strengthen readiness across different regions. Also read: Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis’ wife Amruta quits bank job after 23 years

Along with India, Indonesia also signed an order for 42 Rafale jets from France in February 2022, led by its Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto, with the company Dassault Aviation. The deal was divided into three tranches (6 + 18 +18), taking effect sequentially (Feb 2022, Aug 2023, Jan 2024).

'Same jets, different price': Why India pays more for Rafales while Indonesia pays less - Complete breakdown

Peter Mandelson, the disgraced former Labour minister, was the one who pushed heavily for ex-Prince Andrew to be given the role of UK trade envoy, reports suggest. According to Private Eye, King Charles, who was Prince of Wales at that time, was against his appointment as he worried he would use his position to "cultivate friendships with the wealthy, chase women and play golf". Lord Mandelson is also under investigation by the police for his errant actions. In 2001, when Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent, was to be replaced in the position, Mandelson touted Andrew's royal position as an advantage for the country, and called him "well qualified" for the role, the Daily Mail reported. "With a royal association, they can achieve a reach into overseas foreign markets, which is of immense value to the economy of the country. In that context, the Duke of York will have a very important role for which he is well qualified," Mandelson said.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/arrested-on-66th-birthday-king-charles-brother-andrew-to-be-put-in-custody-suite-with-just-a-bed-and-toilet-1771502972260">Arrested on 66th birthday, King Charles’ brother Andrew to be put in custody suite with ‘just a bed and toilet’</a>&nbsp;"This activity on behalf of the nation should not be confused with the commercial activities for personal gain which are associated with certain other members of the Royal family," he added. While Charles was not in favour of Andrew taking up the role, Queen Elizabeth II backed her son's appointment because of the push being given by Mandelson. According to the Guardian, Andrew said at the time, “I am thoroughly looking forward to it. It will be a complete contrast to my role in the Navy, where I am necessarily working behind closed doors. Now I will have to deal with the press.” He served as the UK's Special Representative for International Trade and Investment from 2001 to 2011, and resigned after his expenses and links with controversial people came under scrutiny.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-arrested-on-allegations-of-misconduct-reports-1771495313947">Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested on allegations of misconduct in public office amid Epstein files investigation</a><h2>Mandelson and Andrew knew each other, had mutual friends with Epstein</h2>Notably, several MPs wanted to establish a register of royal interests at the time to keep a check on any wrongful commercial dealings the Royal Family might enter into. However, the proposal did not go through. According to a report in The Telegraph, Mandelson and Andrew were acquainted at the time as they had worked on an NSPCC campaign together. They also had common friends with Jeffrey Epstein, as Mandelson had served as a consultant for Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell. Ghislaine personally knew both Epstein and Andrew. She attended a "hookers and pimps" Halloween party in New York, where she was photographed with Andrew.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-files-probe-ex-prince-andrew-was-arrested-over-alleged-document-leak-1771594157145/embed<h2>Andrew arrested</h2>On Thursday, Andrew was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He became the first senior royal in modern history to be taken into custody. He was there for around 11 hours and released under investigation by Thames Valley Police. The police searched Andrew's home on the Sandringham Estate, while searches continue at Andrew's former residence, Royal Lodge on the Windsor estate. &nbsp;

Peter Mandelson pushed to get Andrew appointed as the UK trade envoy, while Charles, Prince of Wales at the time, did not support the decision. Meanwhile, Queen Elizabeth II backed Andrew's placement, a report suggests. Andrew was arrested on Thursday and released after questioning.

Peter Mandelson, the disgraced former Labour minister, was the one who pushed heavily for ex-Prince Andrew to be given the role of UK trade envoy, reports suggest. According to Private Eye, King Charles, who was Prince of Wales at that time, was against his appointment as he worried he would use his position to "cultivate friendships with the wealthy, chase women and play golf". Lord Mandelson is also under investigation by the police for his errant actions. In 2001, when Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent, was to be replaced in the position, Mandelson touted Andrew's royal position as an advantage for the country, and called him "well qualified" for the role, the Daily Mail reported. "With a royal association, they can achieve a reach into overseas foreign markets, which is of immense value to the economy of the country. In that context, the Duke of York will have a very important role for which he is well qualified," Mandelson said. Also Read: Arrested on 66th birthday, King Charles’ brother Andrew to be put in custody suite with ‘just a bed and toilet’ "This activity on behalf of the nation should not be confused with the commercial activities for personal gain which are associated with certain other members of the Royal family," he added. While Charles was not in favour of Andrew taking up the role, Queen Elizabeth II backed her son's appointment because of the push being given by Mandelson. According to the Guardian, Andrew said at the time, “I am thoroughly looking forward to it. It will be a complete contrast to my role in the Navy, where I am necessarily working behind closed doors. Now I will have to deal with the press.” He served as the UK's Special Representative for International Trade and Investment from 2001 to 2011, and resigned after his expenses and links with controversial people came under scrutiny. Also Read: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested on allegations of misconduct in public office amid Epstein files investigation Mandelson and Andrew knew each other, had mutual friends with Epstein Notably, several MPs wanted to establish a register of royal interests at the time to keep a check on any wrongful commercial dealings the Royal Family might enter into. However, the proposal did not go through. According to a report in The Telegraph, Mandelson and Andrew were acquainted at the time as they had worked on an NSPCC campaign together. They also had common friends with Jeffrey Epstein, as Mandelson had served as a consultant for Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell. Ghislaine personally knew both Epstein and Andrew. She attended a "hookers and pimps" Halloween party in New York, where she was photographed with Andrew. https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-files-probe-ex-prince-andrew-was-arrested-over-alleged-document-leak-1771594157145/embed Andrew arrested On Thursday, Andrew was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He became the first senior royal in modern history to be taken into custody. He was there for around 11 hours and released under investigation by Thames Valley Police. The police searched Andrew's home on the Sandringham Estate, while searches continue at Andrew's former residence, Royal Lodge on the Windsor estate.

Peter Mandelson pushed to get Andrew appointed as the UK trade envoy, while Charles, Prince of Wales at the time, did not support the decision. Meanwhile, Queen Elizabeth II backed Andrew's placement, a report suggests. Andrew was arrested on Thursday and released after questioning.

King Charles feared Andrew would 'chase women and play golf' as trade envoy: Report

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Bangladesh resumes visa services in India amid thaw in ties with new PM Tarique Rahman

What White House said on tariffs on India after SCOTUS ruling

Will India still pay 18% tariffs after SCOTUS verdict? Here's what Trump said

US strike on alleged drug boat in Eastern Pacific kills three

Who is Neal Katyal? Indian-origin lawyer behind SCOTUS ruling on Trump tariffs

Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy

UK weighs removing Andrew from line of succession for throne over Epstein links

'32,000 people were killed during crackdown in Iran', says Donald Trump

Delhi AI Summit: 75 countries to sign 'Delhi Declaration' for AI development

‘Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump’: Republicans, aides rally behind president

Trump announces 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court

Without tariffs US 'would be bankrupt' says Trump ahead of SC ruling

Tough day for Donald Trump as approval dips, GDP misses, tariffs struck down

‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs

Delhi hosts Indo-Nepal Trade Festival to boost trade, tourism and cultural links

Donald Trump 'considers' limited military strike if Iran doesn’t make a deal

Trump to attack Iran soon? These warships are heading towards Middle East

US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs

Austria hails 'mother of all deals' as EU-India trade pact boosts economic ties

US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs

US SC strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president has a ‘backup plan'

Russia develops high-efficiency catalysts that clean water using sunlight

‘I was trapped’: Epstein survivors recall horrific details of his years of abuse

India, US to hold talks from Feb 23 on sealing trade deal, signing soon after

Why India pays more for Rafales while Indonesia pays less - Complete breakdown

King Charles feared Andrew would 'chase women and play golf' as trade envoy