Venezuela’s interim leader Delcy Rodriguez on Saturday (Aug 29) sought to calm growing public concern over a sweeping oil agreement with the United States, insisting that Caracas will retain sovereignty over the country’s vast petroleum reserves despite Washington gaining major access to them.The deal gives the United States majority control over 65 billion barrels of Venezuela’s proven reserves, with President Donald Trump hailing it as “the biggest oil deal in world history.”“One thing must be absolutely clear: Venezuela retains ownership and sovereignty over its resources,” Rodriguez said in a televised address on Saturday (Aug 29).She said the agreement was intended to turn “cold, inert” resources lying underground into “a source of social and economic well-being for the people of Venezuela.”Caracas has said the arrangement could attract $100 billion in private investment to revive an oil industry crippled by years of economic turmoil, sanctions and chronic underinvestment. But details of the agreement remain limited, fuelling concerns about what Venezuela may be giving up in return.The unease extends beyond government opponents. “We don’t know who this will benefit – whether it’s Venezuela or (the United States),” security guard Jesus Salazar said. “I have my doubts, but we’ll have to wait and see what happens.”<h2>Can Venezuela’s oil industry recover?</h2>Rodriguez has moved to open Venezuela’s tightly controlled mining and oil sectors to greater private and foreign investment, while Washington has eased restrictions on the country’s oil industry.Production rose nearly 30 per cent between January and July, reaching 1.2 million barrels per day. However, that remains far below the roughly three million barrels Venezuela produced a quarter-century ago.Analysts warn any dramatic recovery will take years.“The increase in production won’t be seen for at least three or four years,” said Oswaldo Felizzola, an engineer and professor at IESA in Caracas, as quoted by AFP.For a country still struggling with widespread poverty and soaring prices, the stakes are high. Rodriguez has promised more than $204 billion in tax revenue, though details remain unclear.Supporters of the deal argue foreign investment could revive an industry that Venezuela can no longer rebuild alone. “It’s undoubtedly better than before,” analyst Elias Ferrer said. “Before, this oil wasn’t being extracted; if no one extracts it, no one pays royalties, and no one profits from it.”

Delcy Rodriguez says Venezuela will retain sovereignty over its oil despite a major US deal, as public doubts grow over who will benefit from $100 billion in planned investment.

Venezuela’s interim leader Delcy Rodriguez on Saturday (Aug 29) sought to calm growing public concern over a sweeping oil agreement with the United States, insisting that Caracas will retain sovereignty over the country’s vast petroleum reserves despite Washington gaining major access to them. The deal gives the United States majority control over 65 billion barrels of Venezuela’s proven reserves, with President Donald Trump hailing it as “the biggest oil deal in world history.” “One thing must be absolutely clear: Venezuela retains ownership and sovereignty over its resources,” Rodriguez said in a televised address on Saturday (Aug 29). She said the agreement was intended to turn “cold, inert” resources lying underground into “a source of social and economic well-being for the people of Venezuela.” Caracas has said the arrangement could attract $100 billion in private investment to revive an oil industry crippled by years of economic turmoil, sanctions and chronic underinvestment. But details of the agreement remain limited, fuelling concerns about what Venezuela may be giving up in return. The unease extends beyond government opponents. “We don’t know who this will benefit – whether it’s Venezuela or (the United States),” security guard Jesus Salazar said. “I have my doubts, but we’ll have to wait and see what happens.” Can Venezuela’s oil industry recover? Rodriguez has moved to open Venezuela’s tightly controlled mining and oil sectors to greater private and foreign investment, while Washington has eased restrictions on the country’s oil industry. Production rose nearly 30 per cent between January and July, reaching 1.2 million barrels per day. However, that remains far below the roughly three million barrels Venezuela produced a quarter-century ago. Analysts warn any dramatic recovery will take years. “The increase in production won’t be seen for at least three or four years,” said Oswaldo Felizzola, an engineer and professor at IESA in Caracas, as quoted by AFP. For a country still struggling with widespread poverty and soaring prices, the stakes are high. Rodriguez has promised more than $204 billion in tax revenue, though details remain unclear. Supporters of the deal argue foreign investment could revive an industry that Venezuela can no longer rebuild alone. “It’s undoubtedly better than before,” analyst Elias Ferrer said. “Before, this oil wasn’t being extracted; if no one extracts it, no one pays royalties, and no one profits from it.”

Delcy Rodriguez says Venezuela will retain sovereignty over its oil despite a major US deal, as public doubts grow over who will benefit from $100 billion in planned investment.

‘Venezuela retains sovereignty’: Delcy Rodriguez defends sweeping US oil deal

US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 22) was disrupted during his rally in New York. “Take him home to mummy,” Trump said. “You know what he doesn’t say is his mum’s watching on television right now and she’s loving it.” &nbsp;Trump held a rally in Suffern, New York, on Friday as he sought to energise Republicans ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. Speaking at Rockland Community College, Trump focused largely on economic issues and Republican victories but repeatedly drifted into attacks on Democrats, voter policies, and social issues. The president mocked a recent report released by the Democratic National Committee analysing the party’s 2024 election defeat.&nbsp;&nbsp;Referring to Democrats as ‘Dumocrats’, Trump claimed the report cost $10 million. Trump also highlighted several recent Republican victories, including races in Louisiana, Kentucky, and Georgia involving candidates aligned with his political movement. Celebrating one of the outcomes, Trump told supporters: “We knocked out somebody in Georgia, Raffensperger. We knocked him out.” At least three protesters were removed by police during the rally.<h2>Trump pushes economic message</h2>Although the event was promoted as an economy-focused speech, Trump frequently moved between topics, including voter identification laws, crime in American cities, transgender athletes, and criticism of former President Joe Biden. At one point, Trump complained about toiletries being locked behind security cases in pharmacies and also joked with the audience about what nickname he should use for Biden. Eventually returning to economic policy, Trump defended Republican tax cuts and accused Democrats of opposing them. “I cut your taxes, cut the taxes on workers, families, small businesses, who are the soul of this state,” Trump said. Listing provisions from the tax law, he added, “These are all Republican tax cuts. The Democrats voted against every one of these tax cuts.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/chinese-military-officer-posed-as-waitress-to-spy-on-us-delegation-during-beijing-visit-here-s-what-we-know-1779482488019">Chinese military officer posed as waitress to spy on US delegation during Beijing visit? Here's what we know</a><h2>Watch the video here</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump to a protester: Go home to mom. <a href="https://t.co/noGe5jvVes">pic.twitter.com/noGe5jvVes</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://twitter.com/clashreport/status/2057916800369615356?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Trump revisits Cognitive Test claims</h2>During the speech, Trump once again spoke about taking the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a commonly used screening tool designed to identify early signs of cognitive decline. Trump incorrectly described the assessment as an intelligence test and repeated his claim that he had ‘aced’ it. As he has done at previous events, Trump described what he said was a difficult math-related question from the test. “Toward the end, like they had a question like: ‘Pick a number, sir, any number’. ‘Okay, 203 times nine, divide by two. Add on 1,324. Subtract 1292. Sir. Multiply it out one more time. By 19. What is the answer, sir?’ And I got it right.” He also claimed: “One doctor said, ‘I’ve been doing this test for 20 years. I’ve never seen anybody ace it’.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-s-rustam-nabiev-summits-mount-everest-using-just-his-arms-1779478250107/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-s-rustam-nabiev-summits-mount-everest-using-just-his-arms-1779478250107/embed</a><h2>Familiar stories and campaign attacks</h2>Trump also revisited several stories and talking points he has repeated at past rallies, including criticism of transgender athletes, comments about global leaders, and discussions about prescription drug prices. At one point, he shared an anecdote about a friend discussing the cost of GLP-1 weight-loss medication. “A friend of mine who’s very fat called me,” Trump said.&nbsp;“He’s begging me not to tell his name because he’s actually become quite famous. I tell the story often, so he calls me up … He said, ‘President, I’m in London. I just paid $87 for the fat drug. He said, " It’s the fat shot …I said, ‘It’s not working on you, Charles. Not working at all’… But he knows the price. He goes, ‘I paid $87, and in New York two weeks ago, I bought the same damn thing for $1,300’, and it really made an impression.” The rally marked another effort by Trump to solidify support in battleground districts while shaping the Republican message ahead of the midterm election season.

Donald Trump held a rally in New York ahead of the midterms, attacking Democrats, defending tax cuts and repeating claims about his cognitive test

US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 22) was disrupted during his rally in New York. “Take him home to mummy,” Trump said. “You know what he doesn’t say is his mum’s watching on television right now and she’s loving it.” Trump held a rally in Suffern, New York, on Friday as he sought to energise Republicans ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. Speaking at Rockland Community College, Trump focused largely on economic issues and Republican victories but repeatedly drifted into attacks on Democrats, voter policies, and social issues. The president mocked a recent report released by the Democratic National Committee analysing the party’s 2024 election defeat. Referring to Democrats as ‘Dumocrats’, Trump claimed the report cost $10 million. Trump also highlighted several recent Republican victories, including races in Louisiana, Kentucky, and Georgia involving candidates aligned with his political movement. Celebrating one of the outcomes, Trump told supporters: “We knocked out somebody in Georgia, Raffensperger. We knocked him out.” At least three protesters were removed by police during the rally. Trump pushes economic message Although the event was promoted as an economy-focused speech, Trump frequently moved between topics, including voter identification laws, crime in American cities, transgender athletes, and criticism of former President Joe Biden. At one point, Trump complained about toiletries being locked behind security cases in pharmacies and also joked with the audience about what nickname he should use for Biden. Eventually returning to economic policy, Trump defended Republican tax cuts and accused Democrats of opposing them. “I cut your taxes, cut the taxes on workers, families, small businesses, who are the soul of this state,” Trump said. Listing provisions from the tax law, he added, “These are all Republican tax cuts. The Democrats voted against every one of these tax cuts.” Also Read: Chinese military officer posed as waitress to spy on US delegation during Beijing visit? Here's what we know Watch the video here

Donald Trump mocked Democrats, defended tax cuts, and revisited cognitive test claims during a rally in New York on Friday

'Go home to mom. Take him to mommy', says Trump to protestor during NYC event | WATCH

The United States on Wednesday (April 1) lifted sanctions on Delcy Rodriguez, who assumed leadership after Washington removed her predecessor, Nicolas Maduro, in a January military operation. Her name was removed from the US Treasury’s sanctions list, signaling a major shift in Washington’s approach and recognition of her authority.Rodríguez welcomed the move, describing it as part of improving ties between the two nations.&nbsp;"We trust that this progress will allow for the lifting of the sanctions currently in force against our country, and make it possible to build and guarantee an effective binational cooperation agenda for the benefit of our peoples," she added.Relations between Washington and Caracas have improved since Maduro’s ouster, with Rodríguez working closely with Donald Trump’s administration, including opening Venezuela’s energy sector to US investment.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pentagon-doubles-a-10-attack-planes-in-middle-east-as-us-intensifies-operations-report-1775077839387">Pentagon doubles A-10 attack planes in Middle East as US intensifies operations: Report</a>&nbsp;Rodriguez, who previously served as vice president under Maduro, had been sanctioned along with several key officials, including Vladimir Padrino López and Diosdado Cabello, for their roles in the former government. She dismissed Padrino Lopez in mid-March but continues to balance pressure from Washington with expectations from domestic allies. Cabello, who remains in office, is considered one of her main supporters.&nbsp;In a sign of improving diplomatic ties, the US Embassy in Caracas resumed operations earlier this week after a seven-year closure. The shift follows a US military operation on January 3 that captured Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in Caracas. They were taken to New York to face drug trafficking charges, which they deny. According to Venezuelan authorities, the operation resulted in around 100 deaths.&nbsp;The United States closed its embassy in Caracas in March 2019, shortly after it, along with several Western and Latin American allies, declared Nicolás Maduro illegitimate following an election widely criticized for serious irregularities.

US lifts sanctions on Venezuela’s interim leader Delcy Rodriguez

The United States on Wednesday (April 1) lifted sanctions on Delcy Rodriguez, who assumed leadership after Washington removed her predecessor, Nicolas Maduro, in a January military operation. Her name was removed from the US Treasury’s sanctions list, signaling a major shift in Washington’s approach and recognition of her authority. Rodríguez welcomed the move, describing it as part of improving ties between the two nations. "We trust that this progress will allow for the lifting of the sanctions currently in force against our country, and make it possible to build and guarantee an effective binational cooperation agenda for the benefit of our peoples," she added. Relations between Washington and Caracas have improved since Maduro’s ouster, with Rodríguez working closely with Donald Trump’s administration, including opening Venezuela’s energy sector to US investment. Also Read: Pentagon doubles A-10 attack planes in Middle East as US intensifies operations: Report Rodriguez, who previously served as vice president under Maduro, had been sanctioned along with several key officials, including Vladimir Padrino López and Diosdado Cabello, for their roles in the former government. She dismissed Padrino Lopez in mid-March but continues to balance pressure from Washington with expectations from domestic allies. Cabello, who remains in office, is considered one of her main supporters. In a sign of improving diplomatic ties, the US Embassy in Caracas resumed operations earlier this week after a seven-year closure. The shift follows a US military operation on January 3 that captured Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in Caracas. They were taken to New York to face drug trafficking charges, which they deny. According to Venezuelan authorities, the operation resulted in around 100 deaths. The United States closed its embassy in Caracas in March 2019, shortly after it, along with several Western and Latin American allies, declared Nicolás Maduro illegitimate following an election widely criticized for serious irregularities.

US lifts sanctions on Venezuela’s interim leader Delcy Rodriguez, signaling warmer ties after Nicolas Maduro’s ouster and renewed diplomatic engagement

United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday (January 28), projecting a tough, unapologetic posture on Venezuela, his first public testimony since Nicolas Maduro was captured and flown to the United States. The secretary of state framed the moment as a necessary turning point, warning lawmakers that Venezuela posed a serious strategic danger to US security.&nbsp;Rubio described the Maduro government as deeply entangled with international narcotics networks, arguing that the threat was especially alarming because it existed within the Western Hemisphere. Allowing such activity to continue, he said, was no longer viable. He went on to explain how the US is handling Venezuelan oil reserves that remain under sanctions. While the oil is being allowed into global markets, the revenue is being placed into accounts overseen by the United States. Rubio said the funds are intended for public use in Venezuela, particularly as the country faces diminishing oil storage capacity.&nbsp;According to Rubio, the US does not require Venezuelan oil, but is seeking to help transition the country toward a functional, transparent energy sector free from corruption and political favoritism. He claimed rapid progress has already been made, including the early release of political prisoners, noting that developments have moved faster than anticipated in less than a month. When questioned by Senator Jim Risch about negotiations surrounding Maduro’s removal, Rubio said extensive preparation was necessary to neutralize threats to US personnel. He added that multiple efforts were made to convince Maduro to leave voluntarily, but those efforts failed due to Maduro’s repeated breaches of trust.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/newly-elected-seychelles-president-patrick-herminie-to-make-first-official-visit-to-india-next-month-1769617556811">Newly elected Seychelles President Patrick Herminie to make first official visit to India next month</a>&nbsp;Rubio said this marks the first time in two decades that the US has engaged in serious counter-narcotics discussions with Venezuelan authorities. He also emphasised efforts to roll back Iranian, Russian, and Chinese influence in the country. Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen asked whether interim leader Delcy Rodriguez was involved in drug trafficking. Rubio responded that Rodriguez has not been formally indicted, unlike Maduro and his wife, but characterised Venezuela’s governing structure as inherently corrupt rather than institutional.&nbsp;&nbsp;Shaheen also questioned how the administration would prevent US-controlled funds from flowing to criminal organizations. Rubio acknowledged the risk, saying cooperation with current authorities is unavoidable during the stabilization phase. Republican Senator Pete Ricketts pressed Rubio on the legality and impact of Maduro’s arrest. Rubio confirmed the existence of a US bounty and said the country is safer with Maduro in custody. He added that Congress may eventually assist with Venezuela’s transition through licensing and economic activity, but stressed that Venezuela’s wealth means US financial support will not be required.&nbsp;Rubio said no US taxpayer money is currently being spent in Venezuela, arguing that the country’s collapse stemmed from widespread theft rather than a lack of resources. The administration’s objective, he said, is a stable, democratic Venezuela that can manage its own prosperity. Democratic Senator Chris Coons challenged the administration’s failure to consult Congress in advance, noting lawmakers were told military action was not imminent. Rubio replied that the plan only became feasible late in the process and that secrecy was essential due to leak risks. He later acknowledged that a contractor had internally disclosed elements of the plan.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/moscow-issues-orange-weather-alert-as-heavy-snow-paralyses-city-1769607337514/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/moscow-issues-orange-weather-alert-as-heavy-snow-paralyses-city-1769607337514/embed</a>&nbsp;Further questioning focused on preventing hostile foreign influence. Rubio argued that alignment with the US is in Venezuela’s long-term interest and warned that partnerships with Iran and other adversarial states have fueled instability. Senator Chris Murphy criticised the oil oversight strategy and questioned whether prolonged interim leadership would indicate failure. Rubio declined to set deadlines but said meaningful progress must be evident within six months. He also said that while the president keeps all options available, no further military action is expected.&nbsp;Senator Rand Paul raised constitutional concerns, asking whether seizing a foreign leader would constitute an act of war if done to the US. Rubio rejected the comparison, describing the mission as a brief, targeted law enforcement action and reiterating that the US does not recognize Maduro as Venezuela’s legitimate head of state.

'You couldn’t make a deal with this guy', says Marco Rubio at Senate hearing on Nicolas Maduro’s capture

United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday (January 28), projecting a tough, unapologetic posture on Venezuela, his first public testimony since Nicolas Maduro was captured and flown to the United States. The secretary of state framed the moment as a necessary turning point, warning lawmakers that Venezuela posed a serious strategic danger to US security. Rubio described the Maduro government as deeply entangled with international narcotics networks, arguing that the threat was especially alarming because it existed within the Western Hemisphere. Allowing such activity to continue, he said, was no longer viable. He went on to explain how the US is handling Venezuelan oil reserves that remain under sanctions. While the oil is being allowed into global markets, the revenue is being placed into accounts overseen by the United States. Rubio said the funds are intended for public use in Venezuela, particularly as the country faces diminishing oil storage capacity. According to Rubio, the US does not require Venezuelan oil, but is seeking to help transition the country toward a functional, transparent energy sector free from corruption and political favoritism. He claimed rapid progress has already been made, including the early release of political prisoners, noting that developments have moved faster than anticipated in less than a month. When questioned by Senator Jim Risch about negotiations surrounding Maduro’s removal, Rubio said extensive preparation was necessary to neutralize threats to US personnel. He added that multiple efforts were made to convince Maduro to leave voluntarily, but those efforts failed due to Maduro’s repeated breaches of trust. Also Read: Newly elected Seychelles President Patrick Herminie to make first official visit to India next month Rubio said this marks the first time in two decades that the US has engaged in serious counter-narcotics discussions with Venezuelan authorities. He also emphasised efforts to roll back Iranian, Russian, and Chinese influence in the country. Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen asked whether interim leader Delcy Rodriguez was involved in drug trafficking. Rubio responded that Rodriguez has not been formally indicted, unlike Maduro and his wife, but characterised Venezuela’s governing structure as inherently corrupt rather than institutional. Shaheen also questioned how the administration would prevent US-controlled funds from flowing to criminal organizations. Rubio acknowledged the risk, saying cooperation with current authorities is unavoidable during the stabilization phase. Republican Senator Pete Ricketts pressed Rubio on the legality and impact of Maduro’s arrest. Rubio confirmed the existence of a US bounty and said the country is safer with Maduro in custody. He added that Congress may eventually assist with Venezuela’s transition through licensing and economic activity, but stressed that Venezuela’s wealth means US financial support will not be required. Rubio said no US taxpayer money is currently being spent in Venezuela, arguing that the country’s collapse stemmed from widespread theft rather than a lack of resources. The administration’s objective, he said, is a stable, democratic Venezuela that can manage its own prosperity. Democratic Senator Chris Coons challenged the administration’s failure to consult Congress in advance, noting lawmakers were told military action was not imminent. Rubio replied that the plan only became feasible late in the process and that secrecy was essential due to leak risks. He later acknowledged that a contractor had internally disclosed elements of the plan. https://www.wionews.com/videos/moscow-issues-orange-weather-alert-as-heavy-snow-paralyses-city-1769607337514/embed Further questioning focused on preventing hostile foreign influence. Rubio argued that alignment with the US is in Venezuela’s long-term interest and warned that partnerships with Iran and other adversarial states have fueled instability. Senator Chris Murphy criticised the oil oversight strategy and questioned whether prolonged interim leadership would indicate failure. Rubio declined to set deadlines but said meaningful progress must be evident within six months. He also said that while the president keeps all options available, no further military action is expected. Senator Rand Paul raised constitutional concerns, asking whether seizing a foreign leader would constitute an act of war if done to the US. Rubio rejected the comparison, describing the mission as a brief, targeted law enforcement action and reiterating that the US does not recognize Maduro as Venezuela’s legitimate head of state.

Marco Rubio defends Nicolas Maduro’s capture, US oversight of Venezuelan oil funds, and efforts to curb corruption, narco-trafficking, and foreign influence

Opposition leader Maria Corina Machado said on Friday (January 16) that Venezuela would be freed with backing from Washington and US President Donald Trump, who ordered a raid to capture the country’s authoritarian leader, Nicolas Maduro. "I want to assure the Venezuelan people that Venezuela is going to be free, and that's going to be achieved with the support of the people of the United States and the president, Donald Trump," Machado was quoted as saying during an event in Washington.&nbsp;Machado also said that the country has started a “genuine transition to democracy”. Machado said Venezuela is entering the early stages of democratic change, a shift she said will profoundly affect Venezuelans and have far-reaching consequences for the region and the world. "The result of a stable transition will be a proud Venezuela that will be the best ally the US has ever had in the Americas," she said. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-threatens-to-slap-tariffs-on-nations-opposing-his-greenland-takeover-plan-1768581081251">Trump threatens to slap tariffs on nations opposing his Greenland takeover plan</a>&nbsp;Earlier, Machado said she is still committed to seeking the presidency, despite Washington moving forward without her after Nicolás Maduro’s removal. In an interview on Fox &amp; Friends following meetings in the US capital, Machado said she believes her opportunity has not passed, arguing that she retains the popular mandate to lead Venezuela and would become the country’s first woman president.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/maharani-kamasundari-the-queen-who-gave-away-600-kg-of-gold-1768584042838/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/maharani-kamasundari-the-queen-who-gave-away-600-kg-of-gold-1768584042838/embed</a>&nbsp;Her remarks follow US President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro’s former vice president, as interim leader after a US military operation on January 3 led to Maduro’s capture. Trump has said Machado does not have enough support inside Venezuela and has backed Rodríguez instead, pointing to cooperation on US access to Venezuelan oil. Machado’s movement continues to claim that the 2024 election was rigged by Maduro, an assertion supported by the United States and several international allies.

'Venezuela is going to be free with support from Trump': Maria Corina Machado

Opposition leader Maria Corina Machado said on Friday (January 16) that Venezuela would be freed with backing from Washington and US President Donald Trump, who ordered a raid to capture the country’s authoritarian leader, Nicolas Maduro. "I want to assure the Venezuelan people that Venezuela is going to be free, and that's going to be achieved with the support of the people of the United States and the president, Donald Trump," Machado was quoted as saying during an event in Washington. Machado also said that the country has started a “genuine transition to democracy”. Machado said Venezuela is entering the early stages of democratic change, a shift she said will profoundly affect Venezuelans and have far-reaching consequences for the region and the world. "The result of a stable transition will be a proud Venezuela that will be the best ally the US has ever had in the Americas," she said. Also Read: Trump threatens to slap tariffs on nations opposing his Greenland takeover plan Earlier, Machado said she is still committed to seeking the presidency, despite Washington moving forward without her after Nicolás Maduro’s removal. In an interview on Fox & Friends following meetings in the US capital, Machado said she believes her opportunity has not passed, arguing that she retains the popular mandate to lead Venezuela and would become the country’s first woman president. https://www.wionews.com/videos/maharani-kamasundari-the-queen-who-gave-away-600-kg-of-gold-1768584042838/embed Her remarks follow US President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro’s former vice president, as interim leader after a US military operation on January 3 led to Maduro’s capture. Trump has said Machado does not have enough support inside Venezuela and has backed Rodríguez instead, pointing to cooperation on US access to Venezuelan oil. Machado’s movement continues to claim that the 2024 election was rigged by Maduro, an assertion supported by the United States and several international allies.

Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado said backing from the US and Donald Trump will help free Venezuela as it begins a transition to democracy

US authorities have seized another tanker linked to Venezuela, news agency Reuters reported on Thursday (January 15), citing two officials. The move comes just before a meeting between President Donald Trump and Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado. It is the sixth ship recently targeted for transporting Venezuelan oil or having done so previously.&nbsp;Oil exports are crucial to Venezuela’s economy, generating about 95% of its export income, with China standing out as its primary buyer. According to estimates from the research firm Beyond The Horizon, Venezuela has already repaid more than $50 billion in debt through crude oil deliveries, although roughly $12 billion remains outstanding. The withdrawal of vessels follows closely on the heels of a US operation in which American forces intercepted and seized a Russian-flagged tanker, formerly named Bella 1 and later rebranded as Marinera, in international waters. That action heightened diplomatic tensions between Washington and Moscow and highlighted the United States’ strict enforcement of sanctions.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-are-in-touch-hope-it-resumes-soon-pakistan-reacts-after-us-state-department-freezes-immigrant-visas-from-75-countries-1768480362086">'We are in touch. Hope it resumes soon': Pakistan reacts after US State Department freezes visa processing from 75 countries</a>&nbsp;Under the embargo, Venezuelan waters are effectively off-limits to sanctioned vessels, halting both incoming and outgoing oil shipments. At the same time, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control has widened its sanctions regime to target four Chinese firms linked to Venezuela’s energy industry: Corniola Ltd., Aries Global Investment Ltd., Krape Myrtle Co., and Winky International Ltd.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-faces-many-challenges-as-israeli-elections-loom-1768474235350/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-faces-many-challenges-as-israeli-elections-loom-1768474235350/embed</a>&nbsp;Just two days back, on Tuesday (January 13), two Chinese-flagged supertankers en route to Venezuela to load crude under long-standing oil-for-debt agreements suddenly reversed course and are headed back toward Asia, according to shipping data accessed by news agency Reuters. The shift comes after recent US action against a Russian-flagged tanker linked to Venezuela, underscoring increasing pressure on the country’s oil trade.

US seizes sixth Venezuela-linked tanker ahead of Trump's meeting with Maria Corina Machado

US authorities have seized another tanker linked to Venezuela, news agency Reuters reported on Thursday (January 15), citing two officials. The move comes just before a meeting between President Donald Trump and Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado. It is the sixth ship recently targeted for transporting Venezuelan oil or having done so previously. Oil exports are crucial to Venezuela’s economy, generating about 95% of its export income, with China standing out as its primary buyer. According to estimates from the research firm Beyond The Horizon, Venezuela has already repaid more than $50 billion in debt through crude oil deliveries, although roughly $12 billion remains outstanding. The withdrawal of vessels follows closely on the heels of a US operation in which American forces intercepted and seized a Russian-flagged tanker, formerly named Bella 1 and later rebranded as Marinera, in international waters. That action heightened diplomatic tensions between Washington and Moscow and highlighted the United States’ strict enforcement of sanctions. Also Read: 'We are in touch. Hope it resumes soon': Pakistan reacts after US State Department freezes visa processing from 75 countries Under the embargo, Venezuelan waters are effectively off-limits to sanctioned vessels, halting both incoming and outgoing oil shipments. At the same time, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control has widened its sanctions regime to target four Chinese firms linked to Venezuela’s energy industry: Corniola Ltd., Aries Global Investment Ltd., Krape Myrtle Co., and Winky International Ltd. https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-faces-many-challenges-as-israeli-elections-loom-1768474235350/embed Just two days back, on Tuesday (January 13), two Chinese-flagged supertankers en route to Venezuela to load crude under long-standing oil-for-debt agreements suddenly reversed course and are headed back toward Asia, according to shipping data accessed by news agency Reuters. The shift comes after recent US action against a Russian-flagged tanker linked to Venezuela, underscoring increasing pressure on the country’s oil trade.

US seizes sixth Venezuela-linked tanker ahead of Trump–Machado meeting, continuing recent actions against ships tied to Venezuelan oil

In the past few days, there have been reports in a section of the media that American forces used some kind of 'sonic weapon' or ‘directed-energy weapon’ during the January 3 operation in Caracas that led to the capture and extradition of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores. The reports cited a guard on the ground at the presidential residence of Maduro. Now, a lawyer representing the alleged victims of Havana syndrome has spoken out about these claims. Havana syndrome refers to the phenomenon of alleged sonic waves that led to severe headaches and other symptoms in American and other foreign diplomats posted mainly in Cuba. Here is what you should know.<h2>Where are reports of ‘sonic weapon’ use in Venezuela coming from?</h2>Recently, the New York Post reported, citing a guard at the Caracas complex from which Maduro was captured, that those defending the president experienced severe headaches and nosebleeds as soon as the firefight started. The anonymous, unverified eyewitness claimed US forces deployed an “intense sound wave”. This allegedly caused “mass incapacitation” that included severe headaches, nosebleeds, vomiting blood and paralysis among Venezuelan soldiers, and possibly Cuban troops assisting them.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-bleeding-noses-blood-vomiting-mass-paralysis-did-us-deploy-sonic-weapons-in-venezuela-operation-to-extract-maduro-havana-syndrome-lawyer-says-1768296794658">Two China-flagged supertankers bound for Venezuela reverse course as US tightens crackdown: Report</a><h2>No official confirmation that the US used a sonic weapon, but…</h2>This report was picked up by other media outlets, mostly aligned to US &nbsp;President Donald Trump who orderd and monitored the operation. This led to widespread social media chatter. The claim went viral after the New York Post report was shared by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X, without comment. This was interpreted by some as a tacit endorsement of the claim of sonic weapon use.At the time of writing this, there is no official confirmation or evidence to show that the US indeed used a sonic weapon.Fox News and other mostly Trump-supporting media reported further on the claim, framing it as a “mystery” or “advanced” US weapon.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-venezuela-tensions-us-oil-plans-raise-environmental-fears-wion-1768293342766/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-venezuela-tensions-us-oil-plans-raise-environmental-fears-wion-1768293342766/embed</a><h2>How is the sonic weapon reviving memories of Havana Syndrome?</h2>The alleged use of the directed-energy weapon revived discussion on Havana Syndrome, also known as Anomalous Health Incidents, or AHI. These were unexplained symptoms reported by US personnel since 2016 while working in foreign missions, particularly in the Cuban capital of Havana.It has been noted that the symptoms reported in the Venezuela situation, such as immediate bleeding and mass paralysis, are not similar to the known or alleged sonic or microwave weapon effects associated with Havana syndrome. &nbsp;Those symptoms were usually subtler and inconsistent.US intelligence agencies have in the past repeatedly assessed that it is “very unlikely” that most Havana syndrome cases were caused by a foreign adversary.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/venezuela-s-machado-meets-pope-leo-seeks-support-for-release-of-political-prisoners-nicolas-maduro-caracus-1768234943986">Venezuela’s Machado meets Pope Leo, seeks support for release of political prisoners</a><h2>What did the Havana syndrome lawyer say?</h2>National security lawyer Mark Zaid, who represents Havana Syndrome victims, said that the US had “captured and studied devices potentially linked to AHIs”.Zaid said these devices are not connected to the Venezuela raid, calling the viral story baseless.Critics of the story have claimed that it may be more a tactic of intimidation or psychological signalling than credible reporting.

Where is the speculation that the US used a 'sonic weapon' in Venezuela coming from? While no official confirmation exists, here is what the Havana Syndrome lawyer said about the reports


In the past few days, there have been reports in a section of the media that American forces used some kind of 'sonic weapon' or ‘directed-energy weapon’ during the January 3 operation in Caracas that led to the capture and extradition of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores. The reports cited a guard on the ground at the presidential residence of Maduro. Now, a lawyer representing the alleged victims of Havana syndrome has spoken out about these claims. Havana syndrome refers to the phenomenon of alleged sonic waves that led to severe headaches and other symptoms in American and other foreign diplomats posted mainly in Cuba. Here is what you should know. Where are reports of ‘sonic weapon’ use in Venezuela coming from? Recently, the New York Post reported, citing a guard at the Caracas complex from which Maduro was captured, that those defending the president experienced severe headaches and nosebleeds as soon as the firefight started. The anonymous, unverified eyewitness claimed US forces deployed an “intense sound wave”. This allegedly caused “mass incapacitation” that included severe headaches, nosebleeds, vomiting blood and paralysis among Venezuelan soldiers, and possibly Cuban troops assisting them. Also read: Two China-flagged supertankers bound for Venezuela reverse course as US tightens crackdown: Report No official confirmation that the US used a sonic weapon, but… This report was picked up by other media outlets, mostly aligned to US President Donald Trump who orderd and monitored the operation. This led to widespread social media chatter. The claim went viral after the New York Post report was shared by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X, without comment. This was interpreted by some as a tacit endorsement of the claim of sonic weapon use. At the time of writing this, there is no official confirmation or evidence to show that the US indeed used a sonic weapon. Fox News and other mostly Trump-supporting media reported further on the claim, framing it as a “mystery” or “advanced” US weapon. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-venezuela-tensions-us-oil-plans-raise-environmental-fears-wion-1768293342766/embed How is the sonic weapon reviving memories of Havana Syndrome? The alleged use of the directed-energy weapon revived discussion on Havana Syndrome, also known as Anomalous Health Incidents, or AHI. These were unexplained symptoms reported by US personnel since 2016 while working in foreign missions, particularly in the Cuban capital of Havana. It has been noted that the symptoms reported in the Venezuela situation, such as immediate bleeding and mass paralysis, are not similar to the known or alleged sonic or microwave weapon effects associated with Havana syndrome. Those symptoms were usually subtler and inconsistent. US intelligence agencies have in the past repeatedly assessed that it is “very unlikely” that most Havana syndrome cases were caused by a foreign adversary. Also read: Venezuela’s Machado meets Pope Leo, seeks support for release of political prisoners What did the Havana syndrome lawyer say? National security lawyer Mark Zaid, who represents Havana Syndrome victims, said that the US had “captured and studied devices potentially linked to AHIs”. Zaid said these devices are not connected to the Venezuela raid, calling the viral story baseless. Critics of the story have claimed that it may be more a tactic of intimidation or psychological signalling than credible reporting.

Where is the speculation that the US used a 'sonic weapon' in Venezuela coming from? While no official confirmation exists, here is what the Havana Syndrome lawyer said about the reports &nbsp;

'Bleeding noses, blood vomiting, mass paralysis': Did US deploy 'sonic weapons' in Venezuela operation that extracted Maduro?

Two Chinese-flagged supertankers that were headed to Venezuela to collect crude under long-standing oil-for-debt agreements have abruptly changed direction and are now sailing back toward Asia, according to shipping data referenced by news agency Reuters. The move follows recent US action against a Russian-flagged tanker tied to Venezuela and highlights growing pressure on the country’s oil trade.&nbsp;The very large crude carriers Xingye and Thousand Sunny had been idling in the Atlantic for several weeks, awaiting authorisation to dock at Venezuelan terminals. Their planned cargoes were intended to service loans extended by Beijing to Caracas, which are repaid through oil deliveries rather than cash. Data from LSEG cited by Reuters indicates both ships reversed course amid heightened uncertainty caused by the US embargo on Venezuelan oil and escalating political tensions after Washington seized a tanker linked to Venezuela.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-trump-make-history-stand-with-iranians-protests-ask-us-president-to-intervene-1768241705693">'Trump make history, stand with Iranians': Protests ask US president to intervene</a>&nbsp;Oil exports are central to Venezuela’s economy, accounting for roughly 95% of export revenues, with China representing its most important destination. Research group Beyond The Horizon estimates that Venezuela has already paid back over $50 billion in debt using crude shipments, though around $12 billion remains unpaid. The vessels’ retreat comes shortly after US forces intercepted and confiscated a Russian-flagged tanker, formerly known as Bella 1 and later renamed Marinera, in international waters. The seizure intensified diplomatic strains between the United States and Russia and underscored Washington’s hardline enforcement of sanctions.&nbsp;As part of the embargo, Venezuelan waters are effectively closed to sanctioned tankers, blocking both inbound and outbound oil traffic. In parallel, the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control has expanded its sanctions list to include four Chinese companies connected to Venezuela’s energy sector: Corniola Ltd., Aries Global Investment Ltd., Krape Myrtle Co, and Winky International Ltd.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/winter-armor-vanishes-himalayas-face-bare-peaks-1768242979560/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/winter-armor-vanishes-himalayas-face-bare-peaks-1768242979560/embed</a>&nbsp;Four tankers associated with those firms, Della, Nord Star, Rosalind, and Valiant, have also been blacklisted. While the US has previously sanctioned numerous entities involved in Venezuelan oil exports, the inclusion of Chinese firms is widely viewed as a warning to Beijing to steer clear of the dispute between Washington and Caracas.

Two China-flagged supertankers bound for Venezuela reverse course as US tightens crackdown: Report

Two Chinese-flagged supertankers that were headed to Venezuela to collect crude under long-standing oil-for-debt agreements have abruptly changed direction and are now sailing back toward Asia, according to shipping data referenced by news agency Reuters. The move follows recent US action against a Russian-flagged tanker tied to Venezuela and highlights growing pressure on the country’s oil trade. The very large crude carriers Xingye and Thousand Sunny had been idling in the Atlantic for several weeks, awaiting authorisation to dock at Venezuelan terminals. Their planned cargoes were intended to service loans extended by Beijing to Caracas, which are repaid through oil deliveries rather than cash. Data from LSEG cited by Reuters indicates both ships reversed course amid heightened uncertainty caused by the US embargo on Venezuelan oil and escalating political tensions after Washington seized a tanker linked to Venezuela. Also Read: 'Trump make history, stand with Iranians': Protests ask US president to intervene Oil exports are central to Venezuela’s economy, accounting for roughly 95% of export revenues, with China representing its most important destination. Research group Beyond The Horizon estimates that Venezuela has already paid back over $50 billion in debt using crude shipments, though around $12 billion remains unpaid. The vessels’ retreat comes shortly after US forces intercepted and confiscated a Russian-flagged tanker, formerly known as Bella 1 and later renamed Marinera, in international waters. The seizure intensified diplomatic strains between the United States and Russia and underscored Washington’s hardline enforcement of sanctions. As part of the embargo, Venezuelan waters are effectively closed to sanctioned tankers, blocking both inbound and outbound oil traffic. In parallel, the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control has expanded its sanctions list to include four Chinese companies connected to Venezuela’s energy sector: Corniola Ltd., Aries Global Investment Ltd., Krape Myrtle Co, and Winky International Ltd. https://www.wionews.com/videos/winter-armor-vanishes-himalayas-face-bare-peaks-1768242979560/embed Four tankers associated with those firms, Della, Nord Star, Rosalind, and Valiant, have also been blacklisted. While the US has previously sanctioned numerous entities involved in Venezuelan oil exports, the inclusion of Chinese firms is widely viewed as a warning to Beijing to steer clear of the dispute between Washington and Caracas.

Chinese oil tankers turned back from Venezuela as United States sanctions tighten pressure on the country’s oil exports

Big oil executives met with president trump at the white house on friday to discuss investment plans in venezuela. While some of their investors are more apprehensive, others are enthusiastic about the country's commercial possibilities.

Big Oil Concern on Venezuela: Once Bitten, Twice Shy

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jan 9) met with top American oil executives, urging them to pour money into Venezuela's vast oil reserves, pitching the country as 'open for business' after the dramatic capture of president Nicolas Maduro. However, the response from the industry was cautious at best, with one top executive commenting that Venezuela was "uninvestable".<h2>Was a deal reached?</h2>After the vital meeting, Trump claimed that big oil companies were prepared to invest "at least 100 Billion Dollars" though he offered no details. However, reports suggest otherwise. Despite Trump's assurance that companies will have "total security," his pitch was met with scepticism.&nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-deal-with-us-directly-trump-in-meeting-with-oil-executives-claims-us-not-venezuela-will-make-decisions-on-caracas-vast-reserves-1768010458229">Trump tells oil executives US will make decisions on Venezuela's vast reserves</a>According to AFP, Darren Woods, the chief executive of ExxonMobil, bluntly questioned the premise. "We've had our assets seized there twice," he said. "And so, you can imagine, to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes.""If we look at the legal and commercial constructs and frameworks in place today in Venezuela -- today, it's uninvestable," he added.Trump argued that foreign firms had been exposed and unprotected under Maduro’s rule, but claimed that had now changed. "Now you have total security," he told the room. "It's a whole different Venezuela". He insisted that oil companies would "deal with us directly."<h2>Who was in attendance?</h2>Alongside Trump, in attendance were Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Energy Secretary Chris Wright. They met with executives from Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Halliburton, Shell, Valero, Marathon, Trafigura, Vitol Americas and Repsol, among others.A ConocoPhillips spokesperson said CEO Ryan Lance welcomed discussions about making Venezuela "investment ready," but stopped short of any commitments.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-lost-a-major-trade-deal-because-of-no-call-from-modi-says-trump-aide-lutnick-1767944914723">India lost a major trade deal with US because of ‘no call from Modi’, says Trump aide Lutnick</a>Energy analysts also warned that Venezuela's headline reserves, estimated at around 300 billion barrels, do not translate into quick or profitable production. Years of neglect, crumbling infrastructure, heavy crude that is costly to extract and lingering political risk all pose serious obstacles."There's lots of talk about the size of the reserves -- 300 billion barrels of proved reserves -- but what's often missing from the conversation is how realistic it is for those to be economically extracted," said Rich Collett White of Carbon Tracker.Following the talks, even Trump's Energy Secretary Chris Wright conceded that rebuilding Venezuela's oil sector would "take time," despite earlier saying Washington could control it "indefinitely".

Donald Trump claimed oil giants were ready to invest $100 billion in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture. However, oil executives pushed back, saying the country was “uninvestable” despite US assurances. All you need to know.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jan 9) met with top American oil executives, urging them to pour money into Venezuela's vast oil reserves, pitching the country as 'open for business' after the dramatic capture of president Nicolas Maduro. However, the response from the industry was cautious at best, with one top executive commenting that Venezuela was "uninvestable". Was a deal reached? After the vital meeting, Trump claimed that big oil companies were prepared to invest "at least 100 Billion Dollars" though he offered no details. However, reports suggest otherwise. Despite Trump's assurance that companies will have "total security," his pitch was met with scepticism. Also read | Trump tells oil executives US will make decisions on Venezuela's vast reserves According to AFP, Darren Woods, the chief executive of ExxonMobil, bluntly questioned the premise. "We've had our assets seized there twice," he said. "And so, you can imagine, to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes." "If we look at the legal and commercial constructs and frameworks in place today in Venezuela -- today, it's uninvestable," he added. Trump argued that foreign firms had been exposed and unprotected under Maduro’s rule, but claimed that had now changed. "Now you have total security," he told the room. "It's a whole different Venezuela". He insisted that oil companies would "deal with us directly." Who was in attendance? Alongside Trump, in attendance were Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Energy Secretary Chris Wright. They met with executives from Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Halliburton, Shell, Valero, Marathon, Trafigura, Vitol Americas and Repsol, among others. A ConocoPhillips spokesperson said CEO Ryan Lance welcomed discussions about making Venezuela "investment ready," but stopped short of any commitments. Also read | India lost a major trade deal with US because of ‘no call from Modi’, says Trump aide Lutnick Energy analysts also warned that Venezuela's headline reserves, estimated at around 300 billion barrels, do not translate into quick or profitable production. Years of neglect, crumbling infrastructure, heavy crude that is costly to extract and lingering political risk all pose serious obstacles. "There's lots of talk about the size of the reserves -- 300 billion barrels of proved reserves -- but what's often missing from the conversation is how realistic it is for those to be economically extracted," said Rich Collett White of Carbon Tracker. Following the talks, even Trump's Energy Secretary Chris Wright conceded that rebuilding Venezuela's oil sector would "take time," despite earlier saying Washington could control it "indefinitely".

Donald Trump claimed oil giants were ready to invest $100 billion in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture. However, oil executives pushed back, saying the country was “uninvestable” despite US assurances. All you need to know.

Trump says Venezuela 'open for business,' but big oil isn't convinced; 'Uninvestable' says Exxon

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jan 9) urged top American oil executives to pour money into Venezuela's vast oil reserves, pitching the country as 'open for business' after the dramatic capture of former president Nicolas Maduro. The response from the industry, however, was cautious at best.<h2>'Deal with us directly'</h2>Speaking at the White House, Trump told executives that the United States, not Caracas, would decide which companies are allowed to operate in Venezuela. "We're going to be making the decision as to which oil companies are going to go in," he said. "(We're) going to cut a deal with the companies".In attendance were Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, alongside executives from Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Halliburton, Shell, Valero, Marathon, Trafigura, Vitol Americas and Repsol.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-lost-a-major-trade-deal-because-of-no-call-from-modi-says-trump-aide-lutnick-1767944914723">India lost a major trade deal with US because of ‘no call from Modi’, says Trump aide Lutnick</a>Trump argued that foreign firms had been exposed and unprotected under Maduro’s rule, but claimed that had now changed. "Now you have total security," he told the room. "It's a whole different Venezuela". He insisted that oil companies would "deal with us directly," making it clear that Washington intends to position itself as the gatekeeper to Venezuela's oil wealth, sidelining the oil-rich but cash-starved nation from decisions about exploiting its own resources.<h2>How receptive were the oil executives?</h2>Reports suggest that Trump's pitch was met with scepticism. According to AFP, Darren Woods, the chief executive of ExxonMobil, bluntly questioned the premise. "We've had our assets seized there twice," he said. "And so, you can imagine, to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-are-gonna-start-now-hitting-land-donald-trump-says-us-will-launch-land-strikes-against-drug-cartels-1767929603922">'We are gonna start now hitting land': Donald Trump says US will launch strikes against drug cartels | Watch</a>"If we look at the legal and commercial constructs and frameworks in place today in Venezuela -- today, it's uninvestable," he added.&nbsp;The meeting came less than a week after US forces captured Maduro, an operation Trump has openly linked to control over Venezuela's oil.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Donald Trump urged US oil giants to invest in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture, promising security and saying Washington will decide who drills. Here's what he said.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jan 9) urged top American oil executives to pour money into Venezuela's vast oil reserves, pitching the country as 'open for business' after the dramatic capture of former president Nicolas Maduro. The response from the industry, however, was cautious at best. 'Deal with us directly' Speaking at the White House, Trump told executives that the United States, not Caracas, would decide which companies are allowed to operate in Venezuela. "We're going to be making the decision as to which oil companies are going to go in," he said. "(We're) going to cut a deal with the companies". In attendance were Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, alongside executives from Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Halliburton, Shell, Valero, Marathon, Trafigura, Vitol Americas and Repsol. Also read | India lost a major trade deal with US because of ‘no call from Modi’, says Trump aide Lutnick Trump argued that foreign firms had been exposed and unprotected under Maduro’s rule, but claimed that had now changed. "Now you have total security," he told the room. "It's a whole different Venezuela". He insisted that oil companies would "deal with us directly," making it clear that Washington intends to position itself as the gatekeeper to Venezuela's oil wealth, sidelining the oil-rich but cash-starved nation from decisions about exploiting its own resources. How receptive were the oil executives? Reports suggest that Trump's pitch was met with scepticism. According to AFP, Darren Woods, the chief executive of ExxonMobil, bluntly questioned the premise. "We've had our assets seized there twice," he said. "And so, you can imagine, to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes." Also read | 'We are gonna start now hitting land': Donald Trump says US will launch strikes against drug cartels | Watch "If we look at the legal and commercial constructs and frameworks in place today in Venezuela -- today, it's uninvestable," he added. The meeting came less than a week after US forces captured Maduro, an operation Trump has openly linked to control over Venezuela's oil.

Donald Trump urged US oil giants to invest in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture, promising security and saying Washington will decide who drills. Here's what he said.

'Deal with us directly': Trump tells oil executives US, not Venezuela, will make decisions on Caracas' vast reserves

The US military seized another oil tanker in the Caribbean Sea on Friday (January 9) in a pre-dawn mission, the US Southern Command said. "In a pre-dawn action, Marines and Sailors from Joint Task Force Southern Spear, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security, launched from the USS Gerald R. Ford and apprehended Motor/Tanker Olina in the Caribbean Sea without incident," the US Southern Command wrote in a post on X. "Apprehensions like this are backed by the full power of the U.S. Navy’s Amphibious Ready Group, including the ready and lethal platforms of the USS Iwo Jima, USS San Antonio, and USS Fort Lauderdale," the statement added. “The Department of War’s Operation Southern Spear is unwavering in its mission to defend our homeland by ending illicit activity and restoring security in the Western Hemisphere.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-khamenei-is-looking-to-go-someplace-says-trump-as-protests-intensify-in-iran-1767963290206">‘Khamenei is looking to go someplace,’ says Trump as protests intensify in Iran</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Once again, our joint interagency forces sent a clear message this morning: “there is no safe haven for criminals.” In a pre-dawn action, Marines and Sailors from Joint Task Force Southern Spear, in support of the Department of Homeland Security, launched from the USS Gerald R.… <a href="https://t.co/StHo4ufcdx">pic.twitter.com/StHo4ufcdx</a>&mdash; U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) <a href="https://twitter.com/Southcom/status/2009632097858711656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This comes after the US seized two Venezuela-linked tankers earlier this week, which included a Russian-flagged vessel in the Atlantic Ocean and another tanker in the Caribbean Sea. The White House said this week that President Donald Trump has no intention of backing down from seizing oil tankers linked to sanctions violations, even as critics warn the moves could heighten tensions with Russia and China.&nbsp;“He’s going to enforce policies that are in the best interest of the United States,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Wednesday. “That includes cracking down on dark fleet vessels that are illegally transporting oil.” Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the tanker Olina was suspected of being part of a so-called “ghost fleet” used to move embargoed oil. According to Noem, the tanker was seized after it left Venezuela and attempted to evade US forces.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/drills-focused-on-safety-of-shipping-maritime-economic-activity-draws-criticism-from-us-1767969369919/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/drills-focused-on-safety-of-shipping-maritime-economic-activity-draws-criticism-from-us-1767969369919/embed</a>&nbsp;Maritime risk firm Vanguard Tech said the vessel was trying to break through a US naval blockade in the Caribbean Sea. The Olina is the fifth tanker seized by US authorities in recent weeks. The company added that the ship’s tracking system had been switched off for more than 50 days and was last detected northeast of Curaçao. The seizure, it said, follows an extended effort by US forces to intercept tankers tied to sanctioned Venezuelan oil shipments in the region.

US military seizes another oil tanker in Caribbean Sea as Trump cracks down on Venezuela exports to Russia

The US military seized another oil tanker in the Caribbean Sea on Friday (January 9) in a pre-dawn mission, the US Southern Command said. "In a pre-dawn action, Marines and Sailors from Joint Task Force Southern Spear, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security, launched from the USS Gerald R. Ford and apprehended Motor/Tanker Olina in the Caribbean Sea without incident," the US Southern Command wrote in a post on X. "Apprehensions like this are backed by the full power of the U.S. Navy’s Amphibious Ready Group, including the ready and lethal platforms of the USS Iwo Jima, USS San Antonio, and USS Fort Lauderdale," the statement added. “The Department of War’s Operation Southern Spear is unwavering in its mission to defend our homeland by ending illicit activity and restoring security in the Western Hemisphere.” Also Read: ‘Khamenei is looking to go someplace,’ says Trump as protests intensify in Iran

US military boarded an oil tanker on Friday (January 9) in a pre-dawn operation, the US Southern Command said in a statement

The Senate on Thursday moved to block President Donald Trump from taking military action in Venezuela, just five days after US forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro from Caracas. In a stunning defeat for the president, the upper chamber adopted the “War Powers resolution” by a 52-47 vote to force Trump to end hostilities toward Venezuela, but it still must clear the House. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who had initially proposed the resolution, reintroduced it last month along with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), after Trump amassed military assets in the region and greenlit dozens of strikes against alleged drug boats.&nbsp;“In the Senate, we Democrats are fighting to prevent military adventurism in Venezuela and other countries and endless wars,” Schumer told reporters ahead of the vote.“Donald Trump said last night in his interview with The New York Times. It could take years to solve the problem in Venezuela. That is not what Americans want.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-it-s-the-energy-greed-of-north-venezuela-s-interim-president-slams-us-for-drugs-democracy-falsehoods-1767887211995">‘It’s the energy greed of North’: Venezuela’s interim president slams US for drugs, democracy falsehoods</a>&nbsp;Under the War Powers Act, Congress can adopt a resolution to stop a president from engaging in a military conflict without the consent of the legislative branch.&nbsp;Trump reacted to the development and said Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats on the resolution.&nbsp;&nbsp;In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, “Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats in attempting to take away our Powers to fight and defend the United States of America. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young should never be elected to office again.”&nbsp;&nbsp;

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/reza-pahlavi-urges-iranians-to-continue-protests-warns-tehran-may-cut-internet-1767871076570">Reza Pahlavi urges Iranians to continue protests, warns Tehran may cut internet</a>&nbsp;“This Vote greatly hampers American Self Defense and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief. In any event, and despite their “stupidity,” the War Powers Act is Unconstitutional, totally violating Article II of the Constitution, as all Presidents, and their Departments of Justice, have determined before me. Nevertheless, a more important Senate Vote will be taking place next week on this very subject.”&nbsp;&nbsp;The White House also opposed the measure, arguing that it would undermine the authority of Trump as commander-in-chief.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-us-will-take-all-the-oil-stuck-in-venezuela-and-sell-it-in-market-at-market-rates-marco-rubio-1767806398832">‘US will take all the oil stuck in Venezuela and sell it in market, at market rates’: Marco Rubio</a>&nbsp;“The actions of our Armed Forces have been directed by the President consistent with his inherent responsibility to protect US citizens both at home and abroad,” the White House said in a memo.&nbsp;Last year, Congress repealed the Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) for the Gulf War and the 2003 invasion of Iraq in passing the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act.The Trump administration defended the capture of Maduro as a law enforcement endeavour, pointing to the federal indictment against the Venezuelan leader on drug and weapons charges.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-wants-to-buy-greenland-not-seize-it-marco-rubio-tells-us-lawmakers-1767810822681">‘Trump wants to buy Greenland, not seize it,’ Marco Rubio tells US lawmakers</a>&nbsp;Trump’s team is seeking to leverage its oil quarantine of Venezuela to pressure its current leader, Delcy Rodriguez, into making changes, but questions remain about the longer-term strategy to restore democracy in Venezuela.&nbsp;“We will rebuild it in a very profitable way,” Trump said in an interview on Wednesday. “We’re going to be using oil, and we’re going to be taking oil.”“We’re getting oil prices down, and we’re going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need.”Lawmakers are also eyeing other war powers resolutions to stop Trump from taking military action against Iran or to acquire Greenland.

Under the War Powers Act, Congress can adopt a resolution to stop a president from engaging in a military conflict without the consent of the legislative branch. Trump reacted, saying Republicans should be ashamed of the senators who voted with Democrats on the resolution.

The Senate on Thursday moved to block President Donald Trump from taking military action in Venezuela, just five days after US forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro from Caracas. In a stunning defeat for the president, the upper chamber adopted the “War Powers resolution” by a 52-47 vote to force Trump to end hostilities toward Venezuela, but it still must clear the House. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who had initially proposed the resolution, reintroduced it last month along with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), after Trump amassed military assets in the region and greenlit dozens of strikes against alleged drug boats. “In the Senate, we Democrats are fighting to prevent military adventurism in Venezuela and other countries and endless wars,” Schumer told reporters ahead of the vote. “Donald Trump said last night in his interview with The New York Times. It could take years to solve the problem in Venezuela. That is not what Americans want.” Also Read: ‘It’s the energy greed of North’: Venezuela’s interim president slams US for drugs, democracy falsehoods Under the War Powers Act, Congress can adopt a resolution to stop a president from engaging in a military conflict without the consent of the legislative branch. Trump reacted to the development and said Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats on the resolution. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, “Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats in attempting to take away our Powers to fight and defend the United States of America. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young should never be elected to office again.”

Under the War Powers Act, Congress can adopt a resolution to stop a president from engaging in a military conflict without the consent of the legislative branch. Trump reacted, saying Republicans should be ashamed of the senators who voted with Democrats on the resolution.

Senate clears resolution to restrain Trump from further military action in Venezuela

US President Donald Trump suggested that 'only time will tell' on the topic that how long the United States will take over the governance of Venezuela. Trump said this will speaking exclusively to reporters of the New York Times on Thursday (January 8). When the president was asked on the time duration. He replied by saying, “I would say much longer.” He went on to further say, "We will rebuild it in a very profitable way. We're going to be using oil, and we're going to be taking oil. We're getting oil prices down, and we're going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-will-rebuild-venezuela-in-profitable-way-trump-on-using-oil-reserves-1767874085478">‘Will rebuild Venezuela in profitable way’: Trump on using oil reserves</a>&nbsp;The president went on to further say that he was 'getting along very well' with the current interim president Delcy Rodriguez. On Tuesday (January 6), Trump revealed a plan to refine and sell up to 50 million barrels of oil that had been there in the country under the US blockade. “They’re giving us everything that we feel is necessary,” Trump was quoted as saying, while he was referring to the Venezuelan government.&nbsp;On Wednesday (January 7), White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, in her press briefing said that the US has maximum leverage in the governance of Venezuela. “We're continuing to be in close coordination with the interim authorities, and their decisions are going to continue to be dictated by the United States of America,” Karoline Leavitt was quoted as saying.&nbsp;The White House press secretary also said that there are currently no troops on the ground in Venezuela. On being asked about the safety and security of oil workers in Venezuela, Karoline Leavitt said that the president reserves the right to use the US military if necessary. The president is also going to meet some of the oil executives on Friday (January 9). "The meeting is on Friday, and it's just a meeting to discuss, obviously, the immense opportunity that is before these oil companies right now," White House Press Secretary said reporters.

'Only time will tell', says US President Donald Trump over US governance on Venezuela

US President Donald Trump suggested that 'only time will tell' on the topic that how long the United States will take over the governance of Venezuela. Trump said this will speaking exclusively to reporters of the New York Times on Thursday (January 8). When the president was asked on the time duration. He replied by saying, “I would say much longer.” He went on to further say, "We will rebuild it in a very profitable way. We're going to be using oil, and we're going to be taking oil. We're getting oil prices down, and we're going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need." Also Read: ‘Will rebuild Venezuela in profitable way’: Trump on using oil reserves The president went on to further say that he was 'getting along very well' with the current interim president Delcy Rodriguez. On Tuesday (January 6), Trump revealed a plan to refine and sell up to 50 million barrels of oil that had been there in the country under the US blockade. “They’re giving us everything that we feel is necessary,” Trump was quoted as saying, while he was referring to the Venezuelan government. On Wednesday (January 7), White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, in her press briefing said that the US has maximum leverage in the governance of Venezuela. “We're continuing to be in close coordination with the interim authorities, and their decisions are going to continue to be dictated by the United States of America,” Karoline Leavitt was quoted as saying. The White House press secretary also said that there are currently no troops on the ground in Venezuela. On being asked about the safety and security of oil workers in Venezuela, Karoline Leavitt said that the president reserves the right to use the US military if necessary. The president is also going to meet some of the oil executives on Friday (January 9). "The meeting is on Friday, and it's just a meeting to discuss, obviously, the immense opportunity that is before these oil companies right now," White House Press Secretary said reporters.

In an interview on Thursday (January 8), US President Donald Trump didn't give a definite time period of till when the United States is planning to govern Venezuela&nbsp;

Amid Washington-Caracas tensions, Russia has reportedly sent a submarine to escort an empty rusting oil tanker that was attempting to evade the United States blockade of sanctioned vessels near Venezuela. According to reports, America was trying to intercept the vessel, previously known as Bella 1, now named Marinera. The vessel bound for Russia's Murmansk was scheduled to dock in Venezuela for an oil load but was instead chased into the Atlantic by the United States Coast Guard, according to The Wall Street Journal. Thus, it was empty.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/russia-once-offered-a-bizarre-venezuela-for-ukraine-deal-trump-ex-aide-reveals-watch-1767769345039">Russia once offered a bizarre 'Venezuela for Ukraine' deal, Trump ex-aide reveals. Watch</a><h2>What happened?</h2>Russia reportedly dispatched a submarine to shadow an ageing oil tanker being pursued by the United States near Venezuela. The tanker, which failed to dock in Venezuela to load crude, was instead chased into the Atlantic by the US Coast Guard. Though the ship was empty, US authorities continued tracking it as part of a broader campaign to disrupt fleets moving sanctioned oil, including black market crude linked to Russia.Previously, in December, the tanker's crew reportedly blocked a US attempt to board the vessel and altered course into open waters. As the pursuit continued, the ship's operators took unusual steps. The tanker was renamed Marinera, painted a Russian flag on its hull, and re-registered under Russian ownership.Now, according to US officials cited by the Journal, Moscow asked Washington to stop pursuing the vessel and sent a submarine to escort it. Russia's foreign ministry, as cited by state news agency RIA said it was monitoring the situation "with concern," while state media outlet RT published video footage it claimed showed a US Coast Guard cutter trailing the tanker.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-dictator-trump-just-threaten-us-midterms-potus-on-capitol-riot-anniversary-mulls-cancelling-2026-polls-1767751531955">Did 'dictator' Trump just threaten US midterms? POTUS worried about getting impeached AGAIN</a>Watch here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark" data-dnt="true" align="center">BREAKING WORLD EXCLUSIVE: RT obtains FIRST footage of Russian-flagged civilian Marinera tanker being CHASED by US Coast Guard warship in the North Atlantic <a href="https://t.co/sNbqJkm5O5">https://t.co/sNbqJkm5O5</a> <a href="https://t.co/XtbBML3a6j">pic.twitter.com/XtbBML3a6j</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/2008572288409768011?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>US ready to stand against sanctioned vessels</h2>The US Southern Command, meanwhile, said it stood ready to "stand against sanctioned vessels and actors" travelling through the region. Tracking data cited by WSJ shows the Marinera sailing roughly 300 miles south of Iceland, heading toward the North Sea, with the US Coast Guard still following it.RT also said that the US was trying to intercept the tanker despite its "clear civilian status".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">US Coast Guard attempts INTERCEPTION of Russian-flagged tanker in North Atlantic STORM conditions — source to RT Civilian vessel Marinera, EMPTY &amp; bound for Murmansk, chased by spy planes despite clear civilian status Boarding in adverse weather risks LIVES for political stunt <a href="https://t.co/adAE30vJYd">https://t.co/adAE30vJYd</a> <a href="https://t.co/AwarHFx9UH">pic.twitter.com/AwarHFx9UH</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/2008530462894116880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Russia has reportedly sent a submarine to escort an ageing oil tanker chased by the US near Venezuela, escalating tensions over sanctioned oil. Watch video here.

Amid Washington-Caracas tensions, Russia has reportedly sent a submarine to escort an empty rusting oil tanker that was attempting to evade the United States blockade of sanctioned vessels near Venezuela. According to reports, America was trying to intercept the vessel, previously known as Bella 1, now named Marinera. The vessel bound for Russia's Murmansk was scheduled to dock in Venezuela for an oil load but was instead chased into the Atlantic by the United States Coast Guard, according to The Wall Street Journal. Thus, it was empty. Also read | Russia once offered a bizarre 'Venezuela for Ukraine' deal, Trump ex-aide reveals. Watch What happened? Russia reportedly dispatched a submarine to shadow an ageing oil tanker being pursued by the United States near Venezuela. The tanker, which failed to dock in Venezuela to load crude, was instead chased into the Atlantic by the US Coast Guard. Though the ship was empty, US authorities continued tracking it as part of a broader campaign to disrupt fleets moving sanctioned oil, including black market crude linked to Russia. Previously, in December, the tanker's crew reportedly blocked a US attempt to board the vessel and altered course into open waters. As the pursuit continued, the ship's operators took unusual steps. The tanker was renamed Marinera, painted a Russian flag on its hull, and re-registered under Russian ownership. Now, according to US officials cited by the Journal, Moscow asked Washington to stop pursuing the vessel and sent a submarine to escort it. Russia's foreign ministry, as cited by state news agency RIA said it was monitoring the situation "with concern," while state media outlet RT published video footage it claimed showed a US Coast Guard cutter trailing the tanker. Also read | Did 'dictator' Trump just threaten US midterms? POTUS worried about getting impeached AGAIN Watch here:

Russia has reportedly sent a submarine to escort an ageing oil tanker chased by the US near Venezuela, escalating tensions over sanctioned oil. Watch video here.

Russia sends submarine to shadow oil tanker chased by US near Venezuela | Watch

Russia, in recent days, has been very vocal about its support for Venezuela, especially since the United States, in a shock military raid, captured the South American nation's leader, Nicolas Maduro. However, as per Fiona Hill, Donald Trump's Former Deputy Assistant, Moscow once offered a “very strange swap arrangement between Venezuela and Ukraine”. Hill made the claim during a 2019 congressional hearing, and it is now once again going viral on social media.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-dictator-trump-just-threaten-us-midterms-potus-on-capitol-riot-anniversary-mulls-cancelling-2026-polls-1767751531955">'Dictator' Trump threatens US midterms, confesses he could get impeached AGAIN</a><h2>What does a Venezuela-Ukraine swap mean?</h2>According to Hill, during Trump's first tenure, the Russians hinted that they would be willing to pull their support for Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela for a price: A free hand in Ukraine.During a Congressional hearing in 2019, she said that Russian officials repeatedly floated the idea of a "very strange swap arrangement between Venezuela and Ukraine".Watch:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark" data-dnt="true" align="center">“Russia once suggested the US &#39;swap&#39; Venezuela for Ukraine.&quot; - Former presidential advisor Fiona Hill <a href="https://t.co/cPLbscuvCX">pic.twitter.com/cPLbscuvCX</a>&mdash; The New Statesman (@NewStatesman) <a href="https://twitter.com/NewStatesman/status/2008584628408332606?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

At the time, she said that Russia pushed the idea using articles in Russian media that referred to the Monroe Doctrine - the 1823 declaration by the fifth US president, James Monroe, asserting dominance in the Western Hemisphere. A core idea behind American foreign policy for centuries, the US foreign policy stated that Europe should stay out of the Americas, and in turn, the US would stay out of Europe. The same doctrine was invoked by Trump to justify the Venezuela operation.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-claims-venezuela-will-hand-over-30-to-50-million-barrels-of-oil-rodriguez-insists-no-foreign-power-running-country-1767750235743">Trump claims Venezuela will give US millions of barrels of oil, Rodriguez says..</a>Hill's comments have resurfaced again and are being widely shared on social media following the US stealth mission against Maduro. Talking to AP, she repeated her claims and said, “Before there was a ‘hint hint, nudge nudge, wink wink, how about doing a deal?’ But nobody (in the US) was interested then.” At the time, as per AP, Hill, who was then Trump's senior adviser on Russia and Europe, told Russian officials “Ukraine and Venezuela are not related to each other.”

A resurfaced claim by Trump’s former Russia adviser suggests Moscow once floated a bizarre deal, ditch support for Venezuela in exchange for a free hand in Ukraine. The claim is going viral again after Maduro’s capture. Watch here

Russia, in recent days, has been very vocal about its support for Venezuela, especially since the United States, in a shock military raid, captured the South American nation's leader, Nicolas Maduro. However, as per Fiona Hill, Donald Trump's Former Deputy Assistant, Moscow once offered a “very strange swap arrangement between Venezuela and Ukraine”. Hill made the claim during a 2019 congressional hearing, and it is now once again going viral on social media. Also read | 'Dictator' Trump threatens US midterms, confesses he could get impeached AGAIN What does a Venezuela-Ukraine swap mean? According to Hill, during Trump's first tenure, the Russians hinted that they would be willing to pull their support for Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela for a price: A free hand in Ukraine. During a Congressional hearing in 2019, she said that Russian officials repeatedly floated the idea of a "very strange swap arrangement between Venezuela and Ukraine". Watch:

A resurfaced claim by Trump’s former Russia adviser suggests Moscow once floated a bizarre deal, ditch support for Venezuela in exchange for a free hand in Ukraine. The claim is going viral again after Maduro’s capture. Watch here

Russia once pushed for a bizarre 'Venezuela for Ukraine' deal, Trump ex-aide reveals. Watch

The United States has long portrayed itself as the global custodian of democracy and international law. Born from a rebellion against arbitrary power, its constitutional framework was deliberately designed to restrain executive impulse, especially in matters of war and foreign intervention. Yet modern American foreign policy increasingly tells a different story, one where power precedes principle and strategic interests quietly shape moral arguments.&nbsp;The unfolding dynamics between the United States, Venezuela, and Guyana expose this contradiction with unusual clarity. What appears on the surface as diplomatic support for a small nation’s sovereignty is, on closer examination, a case study in how energy interests, geopolitical signalling, and executive assertiveness converge under the banner of democracy.<h2>Oil changes everything</h2>Guyana’s geopolitical relevance was marginal for much of its post-colonial history. That changed abruptly in 2015, when ExxonMobil discovered vast offshore oil reserves in the Stabroek Block, one of the largest oil finds of the past decade. With an estimated 11 billion barrels of recoverable oil, Guyana was transformed almost overnight, from one of South America’s poorest countries into a critical node in global energy markets.&nbsp;This discovery did more than reshape Guyana’s economy. It revived and intensified a long-running territorial dispute with neighbouring Venezuela over the Essequibo region, a resource-rich area that makes up nearly two-thirds of Guyana’s landmass. Venezuela has historically claimed the territory, rejecting a 1899 international arbitration ruling that awarded it to British Guiana, now Guyana. For decades, the dispute simmered largely at the diplomatic margins. Oil brought it roaring back to life.&nbsp;ExxonMobil’s offshore operations, backed by American capital and strategic interest, effectively internationalised the dispute. Guyana’s oil was no longer just Guyana’s; it was tied to US energy security, multinational corporate interests, and Washington’s broader influence in the Western Hemisphere.<h2>From diplomacy to deterrence</h2>As tensions escalated, American involvement became more explicit. High-level US officials framed the Guyana–Venezuela dispute not merely as a legal disagreement but as a test of regional stability and international order. This framing reached its most pointed expression with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit to Guyana.&nbsp;Standing alongside Guyanese leaders, Rubio issued a blunt warning: any Venezuelan aggression against Guyana or ExxonMobil’s oil infrastructure would carry serious consequences. The language was unambiguous, invoking US military reach and signalling that Washington viewed Guyana’s oil assets as strategically protected interests.&nbsp;For Guyana, US backing was presented as a security guarantee. For Venezuela, it was perceived as intimidation, further evidence that American power, rather than neutral arbitration, was shaping the dispute’s trajectory. What had once been a bilateral territorial disagreement was now entangled with US deterrence doctrine and corporate energy interests. This was not traditional diplomacy grounded in multilateral consensus or international adjudication. It was power projection through warning, a reminder that American support often comes with an implicit hierarchy.&nbsp;The Guyana episode cannot be separated from Washington’s broader posture toward Venezuela. Under successive US administrations, but especially during the Trump era, Venezuela became a target of aggressive sanctions, criminal indictments, and open regime-change rhetoric. While no invasion took place, the message was clear: Maduro’s legitimacy was negotiable, and leadership change was considered an acceptable outcome of external pressure.&nbsp;This selective respect for sovereignty sits uneasily alongside America’s professed commitment to international law. While the United States insists on territorial integrity when it aligns with strategic interests, it has shown far less restraint when sovereignty obstructs geopolitical or economic objectives. In Guyana’s case, sovereignty is defended vigorously, bolstered by oil, corporate investment, and US alignment. In Venezuela’s case, sovereignty is treated as conditional, weakened by sanctions, delegitimisation, and constant external pressure. The inconsistency is not accidental; it is structural.&nbsp;What emerges from this episode is a familiar but evolving pattern. The United States no longer needs overt military occupation to exert control. Economic leverage, diplomatic isolation, corporate protection, and carefully calibrated threats now achieve similar outcomes with fewer political costs at home.&nbsp;This is an empire without invasion, influence exercised without formal declarations of war, accountability diluted by complexity, and democratic rhetoric deployed to justify strategic outcomes. If democracy is to retain any credibility as a guiding principle of foreign policy, it must be applied consistently, not bent to accommodate oil fields, corporate interests, or strategic convenience. Otherwise, it becomes what critics have long accused it of being: a language of power, not a limit on it.

Guyana–Venezuela oil dispute: How the US entered the picture

The United States has long portrayed itself as the global custodian of democracy and international law. Born from a rebellion against arbitrary power, its constitutional framework was deliberately designed to restrain executive impulse, especially in matters of war and foreign intervention. Yet modern American foreign policy increasingly tells a different story, one where power precedes principle and strategic interests quietly shape moral arguments. The unfolding dynamics between the United States, Venezuela, and Guyana expose this contradiction with unusual clarity. What appears on the surface as diplomatic support for a small nation’s sovereignty is, on closer examination, a case study in how energy interests, geopolitical signalling, and executive assertiveness converge under the banner of democracy. Oil changes everything Guyana’s geopolitical relevance was marginal for much of its post-colonial history. That changed abruptly in 2015, when ExxonMobil discovered vast offshore oil reserves in the Stabroek Block, one of the largest oil finds of the past decade. With an estimated 11 billion barrels of recoverable oil, Guyana was transformed almost overnight, from one of South America’s poorest countries into a critical node in global energy markets. This discovery did more than reshape Guyana’s economy. It revived and intensified a long-running territorial dispute with neighbouring Venezuela over the Essequibo region, a resource-rich area that makes up nearly two-thirds of Guyana’s landmass. Venezuela has historically claimed the territory, rejecting a 1899 international arbitration ruling that awarded it to British Guiana, now Guyana. For decades, the dispute simmered largely at the diplomatic margins. Oil brought it roaring back to life. ExxonMobil’s offshore operations, backed by American capital and strategic interest, effectively internationalised the dispute. Guyana’s oil was no longer just Guyana’s; it was tied to US energy security, multinational corporate interests, and Washington’s broader influence in the Western Hemisphere. From diplomacy to deterrence As tensions escalated, American involvement became more explicit. High-level US officials framed the Guyana–Venezuela dispute not merely as a legal disagreement but as a test of regional stability and international order. This framing reached its most pointed expression with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit to Guyana. Standing alongside Guyanese leaders, Rubio issued a blunt warning: any Venezuelan aggression against Guyana or ExxonMobil’s oil infrastructure would carry serious consequences. The language was unambiguous, invoking US military reach and signalling that Washington viewed Guyana’s oil assets as strategically protected interests. For Guyana, US backing was presented as a security guarantee. For Venezuela, it was perceived as intimidation, further evidence that American power, rather than neutral arbitration, was shaping the dispute’s trajectory. What had once been a bilateral territorial disagreement was now entangled with US deterrence doctrine and corporate energy interests. This was not traditional diplomacy grounded in multilateral consensus or international adjudication. It was power projection through warning, a reminder that American support often comes with an implicit hierarchy. The Guyana episode cannot be separated from Washington’s broader posture toward Venezuela. Under successive US administrations, but especially during the Trump era, Venezuela became a target of aggressive sanctions, criminal indictments, and open regime-change rhetoric. While no invasion took place, the message was clear: Maduro’s legitimacy was negotiable, and leadership change was considered an acceptable outcome of external pressure. This selective respect for sovereignty sits uneasily alongside America’s professed commitment to international law. While the United States insists on territorial integrity when it aligns with strategic interests, it has shown far less restraint when sovereignty obstructs geopolitical or economic objectives. In Guyana’s case, sovereignty is defended vigorously, bolstered by oil, corporate investment, and US alignment. In Venezuela’s case, sovereignty is treated as conditional, weakened by sanctions, delegitimisation, and constant external pressure. The inconsistency is not accidental; it is structural. What emerges from this episode is a familiar but evolving pattern. The United States no longer needs overt military occupation to exert control. Economic leverage, diplomatic isolation, corporate protection, and carefully calibrated threats now achieve similar outcomes with fewer political costs at home. This is an empire without invasion, influence exercised without formal declarations of war, accountability diluted by complexity, and democratic rhetoric deployed to justify strategic outcomes. If democracy is to retain any credibility as a guiding principle of foreign policy, it must be applied consistently, not bent to accommodate oil fields, corporate interests, or strategic convenience. Otherwise, it becomes what critics have long accused it of being: a language of power, not a limit on it.

The Guyana–Venezuela oil conflict shows how American foreign policy prioritises power and resources over consistent democratic norms

Venezuela has evolved into a global cocaine launchpad due to its shared border with Colombia and alleged state complicity. High-ranking officials, known as the 'Cartel of the Suns', reportedly facilitate shipments through maritime routes to the Caribbean and to Central America. 

Venezuela has evolved into a global cocaine launchpad due to its shared border with Colombia and alleged state complicity. High-ranking officials, known as the 'Cartel of the Suns', reportedly facilitate shipments through maritime routes to the Caribbean and to Central America.&nbsp;

Haven for drug traffickers: Why Venezuela is considered a major launchpad for global cocaine shipments

Donald Trump on Saturday (Jan 03) confirmed that the United States conducted large-scale strikes inside Venezuela and captured President Nicholas maduro and his wife Cilia Flores “The United States of America has successfully carried out a large-scale strike against Venezuela and its leader, President Nicolas Maduro, who has been, along with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country. This operation was done in conjunction with U.S. Law Enforcement," Trump wrote on Truth Social.&nbsp;As per the initial reports, an elite unit, Delta Force, was central in capturing Maduro in a daring operation in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas and flew him out of the country. Know the history and previous operations conducted by the Delta Forces.&nbsp; The United States Army’s Delta Force, officially known as the 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment–Delta, was established in 1977 to give the US a specialised counter-terrorism and hostage-rescue capability. Founded by Colonel Charles Beckwith, the unit was created after Washington recognised serious gaps in its ability to respond to international terrorist threats.&nbsp;&nbsp;Operating under the US Army Special Operations Command and tasked by the highest levels of government, Delta Force conducts missions that remain largely classified, with details emerging only years later.<h2>From Iran to Mogadishu: Early Combat Operations</h2>Delta Force first entered the public spotlight during Operation Eagle Claw in 1980, the failed attempt to rescue American hostages in Iran. While the mission ended in tragedy, it prompted major reforms in US special operations planning.&nbsp;&nbsp;In 1989, Delta Force played a crucial role in the US invasion of Panama, assisting in the capture of military ruler Manuel Noriega. The unit again saw intense combat in 1993 during operations in Somalia, where Delta operators conducted raids against militia leaders amid fierce urban fighting in Mogadishu.<h2>Central Role in Post-9/11 Counter-Terror Campaign</h2>Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Delta Force became a key instrument of America’s global counter-terrorism strategy. The unit has since carried out high-risk missions across Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and other regions, focusing on dismantling extremist networks, targeting senior militant leaders and conducting hostage-rescue operations.&nbsp;&nbsp;In 2019, the Delta Force, carried out a secretive operation that resulted in the death of former Islamic State terror group leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.&nbsp;Today, Delta Force remains one of the most secretive arms of the US military, tasked with missions considered too sensitive or dangerous for conventional forces, and continues to shape US counter-terrorism doctrine through precision, speed and intelligence-led operations.

Operating under the US Army Special Operations Command, Delta Force executes missions approved at the highest levels, with operational details often remaining classified for years.

Donald Trump on Saturday (Jan 03) confirmed that the United States conducted large-scale strikes inside Venezuela and captured President Nicholas maduro and his wife Cilia Flores “The United States of America has successfully carried out a large-scale strike against Venezuela and its leader, President Nicolas Maduro, who has been, along with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country. This operation was done in conjunction with U.S. Law Enforcement," Trump wrote on Truth Social. As per the initial reports, an elite unit, Delta Force, was central in capturing Maduro in a daring operation in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas and flew him out of the country. Know the history and previous operations conducted by the Delta Forces. The United States Army’s Delta Force, officially known as the 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment–Delta, was established in 1977 to give the US a specialised counter-terrorism and hostage-rescue capability. Founded by Colonel Charles Beckwith, the unit was created after Washington recognised serious gaps in its ability to respond to international terrorist threats. Operating under the US Army Special Operations Command and tasked by the highest levels of government, Delta Force conducts missions that remain largely classified, with details emerging only years later. From Iran to Mogadishu: Early Combat Operations Delta Force first entered the public spotlight during Operation Eagle Claw in 1980, the failed attempt to rescue American hostages in Iran. While the mission ended in tragedy, it prompted major reforms in US special operations planning. In 1989, Delta Force played a crucial role in the US invasion of Panama, assisting in the capture of military ruler Manuel Noriega. The unit again saw intense combat in 1993 during operations in Somalia, where Delta operators conducted raids against militia leaders amid fierce urban fighting in Mogadishu. Central Role in Post-9/11 Counter-Terror Campaign Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Delta Force became a key instrument of America’s global counter-terrorism strategy. The unit has since carried out high-risk missions across Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and other regions, focusing on dismantling extremist networks, targeting senior militant leaders and conducting hostage-rescue operations. In 2019, the Delta Force, carried out a secretive operation that resulted in the death of former Islamic State terror group leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Today, Delta Force remains one of the most secretive arms of the US military, tasked with missions considered too sensitive or dangerous for conventional forces, and continues to shape US counter-terrorism doctrine through precision, speed and intelligence-led operations.

Operating under the US Army Special Operations Command, Delta Force executes missions approved at the highest levels, with operational details often remaining classified for years.

Inside Delta Force, elite US military unit that captured Venezuela’s president

United States ally Russia, along with China, slammed the nation on Tuesday (Dec 23) for its military and economic pressure campaign on Venezuela. At the UN Security Council, Moscow and Beijing labelled the US campaign against Venezuela "intimidation" and "cowboy behaviour", accusing Washington of going against "all key norms of international law." Venezuela, meanwhile, alleged that Washington was executing "the greatest extortion known in our history." This comes a day after the US President inadvertently confirmed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's claim that the US wants regime change. Speaking to reporters at his Florida residence on Monday, Trump was asked whether the growing US military presence and threats were aimed at forcing Maduro out of office after more than a decade. "That's up to him, what he wants to do," Trump said. "I think it would be smart for him to do that."&nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-it-ll-be-smart-if-maduro-steps-down-accidentally-confirms-venezuela-prez-s-biggest-fear-us-wants-a-regime-change-1766454570582">Trump accidentally confirms Venezuela President Maduro's biggest fear: US wants a regime change</a><h2>What did Russia and China say?</h2>Russian ambassador to the United Nations said that the US blockade was an "act of aggression" and alleged that "the acts by the US side run counter to all key norms of international law"."The responsibility of Washington is also evident for the constant catastrophic consequences of such cowboy-like conduct," he told the council.Meanwhile, Chinese representative, Sun Lei said that his country "opposes all acts of unilateralism and bullying and supports all countries in defending their sovereignty and national dignity".Slamming US, Venezuela ambassador Samuel Moncada told the UN that they "are in the presence of a power that acts outside of international law, demanding that Venezuelans vacate our country and hand it over."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-most-lethal-trump-class-warships-are-here-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-largest-battleship-its-weapon-nuclear-capabilities-explained-in-pics-1766473350248">'Most lethal' Trump-class warships are here! All you need to know about the largest battleship | Explained</a><h2>US defends its pressure campaign</h2>On Tuesday, US Ambassador Mike Waltz, while responding to the Russian and Chinese criticism, insisted that the United States "will do everything in its power to protect our hemisphere, our borders, and the American people."Trump has repeatedly accused Venezuela of using oil, the nation's main resource, to finance "narcoterrorism, human trafficking, murders, and kidnappings." Reiterating the POTUS's accusations, Waltz said, "Nicolás Maduro is a fugitive wanted by American justice and the head of the foreign terrorist organisation the 'Cartel de los Soles.'" However, it must be noted that experts insist that there's no evidence of the existence of an organised group with a defined hierarchy that goes by that name.

Russia and China slammed the US at the UN Security Council for its pressure campaign on Venezuela, calling it intimidation and a violation of international law. THIS is how the US defended its actions.

United States ally Russia, along with China, slammed the nation on Tuesday (Dec 23) for its military and economic pressure campaign on Venezuela. At the UN Security Council, Moscow and Beijing labelled the US campaign against Venezuela "intimidation" and "cowboy behaviour", accusing Washington of going against "all key norms of international law." Venezuela, meanwhile, alleged that Washington was executing "the greatest extortion known in our history." This comes a day after the US President inadvertently confirmed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's claim that the US wants regime change. Speaking to reporters at his Florida residence on Monday, Trump was asked whether the growing US military presence and threats were aimed at forcing Maduro out of office after more than a decade. "That's up to him, what he wants to do," Trump said. "I think it would be smart for him to do that." Also read | Trump accidentally confirms Venezuela President Maduro's biggest fear: US wants a regime change What did Russia and China say? Russian ambassador to the United Nations said that the US blockade was an "act of aggression" and alleged that "the acts by the US side run counter to all key norms of international law". "The responsibility of Washington is also evident for the constant catastrophic consequences of such cowboy-like conduct," he told the council. Meanwhile, Chinese representative, Sun Lei said that his country "opposes all acts of unilateralism and bullying and supports all countries in defending their sovereignty and national dignity". Slamming US, Venezuela ambassador Samuel Moncada told the UN that they "are in the presence of a power that acts outside of international law, demanding that Venezuelans vacate our country and hand it over." Also read | 'Most lethal' Trump-class warships are here! All you need to know about the largest battleship | Explained US defends its pressure campaign On Tuesday, US Ambassador Mike Waltz, while responding to the Russian and Chinese criticism, insisted that the United States "will do everything in its power to protect our hemisphere, our borders, and the American people." Trump has repeatedly accused Venezuela of using oil, the nation's main resource, to finance "narcoterrorism, human trafficking, murders, and kidnappings." Reiterating the POTUS's accusations, Waltz said, "Nicolás Maduro is a fugitive wanted by American justice and the head of the foreign terrorist organisation the 'Cartel de los Soles.'" However, it must be noted that experts insist that there's no evidence of the existence of an organised group with a defined hierarchy that goes by that name.

Russia and China slammed the US at the UN Security Council for its pressure campaign on Venezuela, calling it intimidation and a violation of international law. THIS is how the US defended its actions.

Russia and China blast US's ‘cowboy behaviour’ at UN, back Venezuela's sovereignty

Venezuela on Saturday (Dec 20) slammed the seizure of an oil tanker by the US as “theft and kidnapping”. This comes after the United States forces earlier “apprehended” an oil tanker off Venezuela, as announced by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The incident marks the second in two weeks that US forces have intercepted a tanker in the region. Earlier, US President Donald Trump announced a blockade of “sanctioned oil vessels” heading to and leaving Venezuela.“These acts will not go unpunished,” Vice President Delcy Rodriguez said in a statement published on social media, adding that “those responsible for these serious events will answer to justice and to history for their criminal conduct.”Announcing the military action, Noem posted footage from the operation on social media. She added that the US Coast Guard, along with the support of the Department of War, seized the oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela. She further alleged that the “illicit movement of sanctioned oil” is used to fund narco terrorism in the region.“In a pre-dawn action early this morning on Dec. 20, the US Coast Guard with the support of the Department of War apprehended an oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela,” she wrote. “The United States will continue to pursue the illicit movement of sanctioned oil that is used to fund narco terrorism in the region. We will find you, and we will stop you.”Amid the mounting tensions between the two nations, Trump has said that he does not rule out the possibility of a war with Venezuela. On Thursday (Dec 18), the US president said that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil. His remarks have sparked concerns about the legality of the campaign in international waters. Under the US Constitution, the president serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Congress holds the exclusive authority to formally declare war.

Venezuela condemned the US seizure of an oil tanker as “theft and kidnapping,” warning it would not go unpunished. The move follows Trump’s blockade of sanctioned vessels and rising tensions, with concerns over legality and potential conflict.

Venezuela on Saturday (Dec 20) slammed the seizure of an oil tanker by the US as “theft and kidnapping”. This comes after the United States forces earlier “apprehended” an oil tanker off Venezuela, as announced by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The incident marks the second in two weeks that US forces have intercepted a tanker in the region. Earlier, US President Donald Trump announced a blockade of “sanctioned oil vessels” heading to and leaving Venezuela. “These acts will not go unpunished,” Vice President Delcy Rodriguez said in a statement published on social media, adding that “those responsible for these serious events will answer to justice and to history for their criminal conduct.” Announcing the military action, Noem posted footage from the operation on social media. She added that the US Coast Guard, along with the support of the Department of War, seized the oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela. She further alleged that the “illicit movement of sanctioned oil” is used to fund narco terrorism in the region. “In a pre-dawn action early this morning on Dec. 20, the US Coast Guard with the support of the Department of War apprehended an oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela,” she wrote. “The United States will continue to pursue the illicit movement of sanctioned oil that is used to fund narco terrorism in the region. We will find you, and we will stop you.” Amid the mounting tensions between the two nations, Trump has said that he does not rule out the possibility of a war with Venezuela. On Thursday (Dec 18), the US president said that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil. His remarks have sparked concerns about the legality of the campaign in international waters. Under the US Constitution, the president serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Congress holds the exclusive authority to formally declare war.

Venezuela condemned the US seizure of an oil tanker as “theft and kidnapping,” warning it would not go unpunished. The move follows Trump’s blockade of sanctioned vessels and rising tensions, with concerns over legality and potential conflict.

‘These acts will not go unpunished’: Venezuela warns after US seizes oil tanker over ‘illicit movement’

The United States on Saturday (Dec 20) “apprehended” an oil tanker off Venezuela, said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The move marks the second in two weeks that US forces have intercepted a tanker in the region. This comes after US President Donald Trump announced a blockade of “sanctioned oil vessels” heading to and leaving Venezuela. Meanwhile, Caracas has called the action a “theft and kidnapping,” as tensions rise between the two nations.&nbsp;Announcing the military action, Noem posted footage from the operation on social media. She added that the US Coast Guard, along with the support of the Department of War, seized the oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela. She further alleged that the “illicit movement of sanctioned oil” is used to fund narco terrorism in the region.&nbsp;“In a pre-dawn action early this morning on Dec. 20, the US Coast Guard with the support of the Department of War apprehended an oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela,” she wrote. “The United States will continue to pursue the illicit movement of sanctioned oil that is used to fund narco terrorism in the region. We will find you, and we will stop you.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">In a pre-dawn action early this morning on Dec. 20, the US Coast Guard with the support of the Department of War apprehended an oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela. The United States will continue to pursue the illicit movement of sanctioned oil that is used to fund… <a href="https://t.co/nSZ4mi6axc">pic.twitter.com/nSZ4mi6axc</a>&mdash; Secretary Kristi Noem (@Sec_Noem) <a href="https://twitter.com/Sec_Noem/status/2002481990755627050?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 20, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This comes as the US continues to expand its military presence in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, carrying out strikes on alleged drug boats.&nbsp;Amid the mounting tensions between the two nations, Trump has said that he does not rule out the possibility of a war with Venezuela. On Thursday (Dec 18), the US president said that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil. His remarks have sparked concerns about the legality of the campaign in international waters. Under the US Constitution, the president serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Congress holds the exclusive authority to formally declare war.&nbsp;

This comes after US President Donald Trump announced a blockade of “sanctioned oil vessels” heading to and leaving Venezuela. 

The United States on Saturday (Dec 20) “apprehended” an oil tanker off Venezuela, said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The move marks the second in two weeks that US forces have intercepted a tanker in the region. This comes after US President Donald Trump announced a blockade of “sanctioned oil vessels” heading to and leaving Venezuela. Meanwhile, Caracas has called the action a “theft and kidnapping,” as tensions rise between the two nations. Announcing the military action, Noem posted footage from the operation on social media. She added that the US Coast Guard, along with the support of the Department of War, seized the oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela. She further alleged that the “illicit movement of sanctioned oil” is used to fund narco terrorism in the region. “In a pre-dawn action early this morning on Dec. 20, the US Coast Guard with the support of the Department of War apprehended an oil tanker that was last docked in Venezuela,” she wrote. “The United States will continue to pursue the illicit movement of sanctioned oil that is used to fund narco terrorism in the region. We will find you, and we will stop you.”

This comes after US President Donald Trump announced a blockade of “sanctioned oil vessels” heading to and leaving Venezuela.&nbsp;

WATCH | US intercepts second oil tanker off Venezuela over ‘illicit movement’

US President Donald Trump has said that he does not rule out the possibility of a war with Venezuela. Meanwhile, his top diplomat, Marco Rubio, announced a blockade on sanctioned oil tankers going to and from Venezuela. This comes as the US continues to expand its military presence in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, carrying out strikes on alleged drug boats.When asked about a war with the South American nation, Trump told NBC News in an interview, “I don’t rule it out, no.”Trump did not say whether he wants to oust Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. In an earlier interview, Trump said that the leftist firebrand’s “days are numbered.”“He knows exactly what I want,” Trump said. “He knows better than anybody.”<h2>‘Goal is to change dynamic’</h2>Defending the US military actions, Rubio said, “It is clear that the current status quo with the Venezuelan regime is intolerable for the United States.”“So yes, our goal is to change that dynamic, and that’s why the president is doing what he’s doing,” he said of Trump during a press conference at the State Department. He declined to say whether the US was aiming to overthrow Maduro.Earlier on Thursday (Dec 18), Trump said that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil amid rising tensions with the country. His remarks have sparked concerns about the legality of the campaign in international waters. Under the US Constitution, the president serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Congress holds the exclusive authority to formally declare war.“I’m not going to speculate about things that, you know, haven’t happened and may never happen,” Rubio said. “I can tell you that to this point, nothing has happened that requires us to notify Congress or get congressional approval or cross the threshold in the war.”According to an AFP tally, 104 people have been killed in US strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean since September. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has provided no evidence regarding the matter.

Earlier on Thursday (Dec 18), Trump said that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil amid rising tensions with the country. 

US President Donald Trump has said that he does not rule out the possibility of a war with Venezuela. Meanwhile, his top diplomat, Marco Rubio, announced a blockade on sanctioned oil tankers going to and from Venezuela. This comes as the US continues to expand its military presence in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, carrying out strikes on alleged drug boats. When asked about a war with the South American nation, Trump told NBC News in an interview, “I don’t rule it out, no.” Trump did not say whether he wants to oust Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. In an earlier interview, Trump said that the leftist firebrand’s “days are numbered.” “He knows exactly what I want,” Trump said. “He knows better than anybody.” ‘Goal is to change dynamic’ Defending the US military actions, Rubio said, “It is clear that the current status quo with the Venezuelan regime is intolerable for the United States.” “So yes, our goal is to change that dynamic, and that’s why the president is doing what he’s doing,” he said of Trump during a press conference at the State Department. He declined to say whether the US was aiming to overthrow Maduro. Earlier on Thursday (Dec 18), Trump said that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil amid rising tensions with the country. His remarks have sparked concerns about the legality of the campaign in international waters. Under the US Constitution, the president serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Congress holds the exclusive authority to formally declare war. “I’m not going to speculate about things that, you know, haven’t happened and may never happen,” Rubio said. “I can tell you that to this point, nothing has happened that requires us to notify Congress or get congressional approval or cross the threshold in the war.” According to an AFP tally, 104 people have been killed in US strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean since September. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has provided no evidence regarding the matter.

Earlier on Thursday (Dec 18), Trump said that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil amid rising tensions with the country.&nbsp;

‘Venezuelan regime is intolerable’: Rubio defends Trump amid war concerns

Venezuela has strongly rejected the notion that its oil exports have been impacted by US sanctions, following US President Donald Trump's announcement of a total blockade. In a statement, state-owned oil company PDVSA insisted that its operations remain unaffected, with crude oil exports and related shipments continuing as usual. "Oil tankers associated with PDVSA are still active," the company confirmed.&nbsp;Trump had declared on Tuesday (December 16) that a comprehensive blockade would be imposed on all oil tankers linked to Venezuela, restricting the flow of oil in and out of the country. He also warned of the "largest Armada ever assembled in South America," referring to the US military's presence in the Caribbean, which includes the world’s largest aircraft carrier. Despite these threats, Venezuela's military, which backs President Nicolas Maduro, vowed not to be intimidated, asserting that the country would not bow to external pressure. PDVSA, for its part, stated that the company’s operations and workforce remain steadfast, unaffected by the ongoing sanctions or military posturing.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-praises-bhutan-s-lingzhi-dzong-project-oblivious-to-india-s-major-financial-support-behind-it-1765979491836">Pakistan praises Bhutan’s Lingzhi Dzong project, oblivious to India’s major financial support behind it</a><h2>Venezuelan military 'not intimidated' by Trump threats: Defence ministry</h2>The Venezuelan military on Wednesday (December 17) said that it was not intimidated by threats from Donald Trump, who has ordered a blockade of sanctioned oil vessels heading to and leaving the South American country. "We say to the US government and its president that we are not intimidated by their crude and arrogant threats," Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez said at an event, surrounded by senior commanders who have repeatedly vowed loyalty to President Nicolas Maduro. "The dignity of this homeland is neither negotiable nor cowed by absolutely anyone," the minister added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-lie-pure-nonsense-putin-slams-nato-chief-s-prepare-for-a-war-remarks-says-russia-is-not-threat-for-europe-1765985005838">‘Lie, pure nonsense’: Putin slams NATO chief’s ‘prepare for a war’ remark, says Russia is not threat for Europe</a>

Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA has said that crude oil exports remain unaffected despite President Donald Trump's announcement of a US blockade against Venezuelan tankers

Venezuela has strongly rejected the notion that its oil exports have been impacted by US sanctions, following US President Donald Trump's announcement of a total blockade. In a statement, state-owned oil company PDVSA insisted that its operations remain unaffected, with crude oil exports and related shipments continuing as usual. "Oil tankers associated with PDVSA are still active," the company confirmed. Trump had declared on Tuesday (December 16) that a comprehensive blockade would be imposed on all oil tankers linked to Venezuela, restricting the flow of oil in and out of the country. He also warned of the "largest Armada ever assembled in South America," referring to the US military's presence in the Caribbean, which includes the world’s largest aircraft carrier. Despite these threats, Venezuela's military, which backs President Nicolas Maduro, vowed not to be intimidated, asserting that the country would not bow to external pressure. PDVSA, for its part, stated that the company’s operations and workforce remain steadfast, unaffected by the ongoing sanctions or military posturing. Also Read: Pakistan praises Bhutan’s Lingzhi Dzong project, oblivious to India’s major financial support behind it Venezuelan military 'not intimidated' by Trump threats: Defence ministry The Venezuelan military on Wednesday (December 17) said that it was not intimidated by threats from Donald Trump, who has ordered a blockade of sanctioned oil vessels heading to and leaving the South American country. "We say to the US government and its president that we are not intimidated by their crude and arrogant threats," Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez said at an event, surrounded by senior commanders who have repeatedly vowed loyalty to President Nicolas Maduro. "The dignity of this homeland is neither negotiable nor cowed by absolutely anyone," the minister added. Also Read: ‘Lie, pure nonsense’: Putin slams NATO chief’s ‘prepare for a war’ remark, says Russia is not threat for Europe

Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA has said that crude oil exports remain unaffected despite President Donald Trump's announcement of a US blockade against Venezuelan tankers

'Export operations for crude and byproducts continue normally', says Venezuela despite Trump 'blockade'

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Dec 16) dramatically escalated his pressure campaign against Venezuela, announcing what he called a "total and complete blockade" of sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving the country. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the United States would move to intercept vessels linked to Venezuela's oil trade, arguing that the revenue was being used to prop up President Nicolás Maduro’s government. This comes as Caracas lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations Security Council over the tanker seized by the US recently. Calling it an act of "state-sponsored piracy".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fentanyl-more-dangerous-than-a-bomb-trump-classifies-drug-as-weapon-of-mass-destruction-1765847533698">Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction'</a><h2>Trump slams 'illegitimate Maduro regime'</h2>In his Truth Social post, Trump said, "Today, I am ordering A TOTAL AND COMPLETE BLOCKADE OF ALL SANCTIONED OIL TANKERS going into, and out of, Venezuela," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform Tuesday evening. Calling the Venezuelan government "illegitimate Maduro regime," he alleged that it was "using Oil from these stolen Oil Fields to finance themselves, Drug Terrorism, Human Trafficking, Murder, and Kidnapping".The announcement marks a sharp expansion of Washington’s pressure campaign against Caracas. For months, the US has been steadily increasing its military presence in the Caribbean, officially framing the deployment as a counter-narcotics operation. That buildup now includes the world's largest aircraft carrier and a growing number of warships and surveillance aircraft operating close to Venezuelan waters.In recent weeks, US forces have carried out strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the region, operations that have killed nearly 90 people. Last week, American forces also seized a large oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast, claiming it was transporting black-market oil in violation of US sanctions. Washington later announced fresh sanctions on additional vessels tied to the trade.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/marijuana-research-material-but-fentanyl-a-weapon-of-mass-destruction-trump-s-explosive-announcement-on-devil-s-lettuce-1765868829719">Trump's cannabis shift: POTUS makes explosive announcement on devil's lettuce</a><h2>US action against Venezuela to "only get bigger"</h2>Trump also warned that the naval presence would "only get bigger" until Venezuela returned "to the United States of America all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us." While the US already enforces sweeping sanctions on Venezuela’s energy sector, a full blockade of oil exports could further cripple the country’s fragile economy.<h2>Venezuela urges UN to condemn US</h2>Maduro in a letter sent to Slovenia's UN ambassador, whose country currently holds the rotating Security Council presidency, accused Washington of illegally using military force against a private vessel and stealing a cargo involved in lawful international trade.The Maduro government also demanded the release of what it described as the tanker’s "kidnapped" crew.

Trump announces a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers to choke Maduro’s regime, vows US naval action will only grow. Scroll down for more.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Dec 16) dramatically escalated his pressure campaign against Venezuela, announcing what he called a "total and complete blockade" of sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving the country. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the United States would move to intercept vessels linked to Venezuela's oil trade, arguing that the revenue was being used to prop up President Nicolás Maduro’s government. This comes as Caracas lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations Security Council over the tanker seized by the US recently. Calling it an act of "state-sponsored piracy". Also read | Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction' Trump slams 'illegitimate Maduro regime' In his Truth Social post, Trump said, "Today, I am ordering A TOTAL AND COMPLETE BLOCKADE OF ALL SANCTIONED OIL TANKERS going into, and out of, Venezuela," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform Tuesday evening. Calling the Venezuelan government "illegitimate Maduro regime," he alleged that it was "using Oil from these stolen Oil Fields to finance themselves, Drug Terrorism, Human Trafficking, Murder, and Kidnapping". The announcement marks a sharp expansion of Washington’s pressure campaign against Caracas. For months, the US has been steadily increasing its military presence in the Caribbean, officially framing the deployment as a counter-narcotics operation. That buildup now includes the world's largest aircraft carrier and a growing number of warships and surveillance aircraft operating close to Venezuelan waters. In recent weeks, US forces have carried out strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the region, operations that have killed nearly 90 people. Last week, American forces also seized a large oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast, claiming it was transporting black-market oil in violation of US sanctions. Washington later announced fresh sanctions on additional vessels tied to the trade. Also read | Trump's cannabis shift: POTUS makes explosive announcement on devil's lettuce US action against Venezuela to "only get bigger" Trump also warned that the naval presence would "only get bigger" until Venezuela returned "to the United States of America all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us." While the US already enforces sweeping sanctions on Venezuela’s energy sector, a full blockade of oil exports could further cripple the country’s fragile economy. Venezuela urges UN to condemn US Maduro in a letter sent to Slovenia's UN ambassador, whose country currently holds the rotating Security Council presidency, accused Washington of illegally using military force against a private vessel and stealing a cargo involved in lawful international trade. The Maduro government also demanded the release of what it described as the tanker’s "kidnapped" crew.

Trump announces a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers to choke Maduro’s regime, vows US naval action will only grow. Scroll down for more.

Trump turns up heat on Venezuela with ‘total and complete blockade’ of oil tankers

The US Southern Command said on Monday (Dec 15) that it carried out strikes on three vessels in international waters, killing eight men. It said that the operation was carried out on narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific. In his war against drug cartels, the United States struck more than 20 vessels in the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea near Venezuela. At least 90 suspected drug smugglers have been killed in the process. Despite criticism, the Trump administration, including the US president, have defended the legality of the strikes. The strikes are also seen as the precursor to US land strikes on Venezuela that Trump has said will soon start.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">On Dec. 15, at the direction of <a href="https://twitter.com/SecWar?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SecWar</a> Pete Hegseth, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted lethal kinetic strikes on three vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations in international waters. Intelligence confirmed that the vessels were transiting along known… <a href="https://t.co/IQfCVvUpau">pic.twitter.com/IQfCVvUpau</a>&mdash; U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) <a href="https://twitter.com/Southcom/status/2000756230252314901?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/from-fake-news-to-fog-of-war-trump-admin-faces-backlash-over-hegseth-s-second-strike-on-drug-boats-1764730320331">Trump faces backlash even as Hegseth backs second strike on drug-boats: Will be testify before Congress?</a>&nbsp;"Intelligence confirmed that the vessels were transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific and were engaged in narco-trafficking," the military said in a post on X. "Our operations in the Southcom region are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in compliance with the Law of Armed Conflict," Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson told reporters earlier this month.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/did-hegseth-order-killing-of-drug-boat-survivors-amid-venezuela-conflict-trump-breaks-silence-1764564406451">Did Hegseth order killing of drug-boat survivors amid Venezuela conflict? Trump breaks silence</a>&nbsp;The Trump administration continues with the boat strikes even as it is dealing with a massive controversy over killing of boat survivors by conducting second strike, earlier in September. Calls have been made for Hegseth to testify under oath about the second strike. While he called initial reports about the second strike “fake”, the White House, later, named Admiral Frank Bradley as the person who authorised the second strike. Legal experts, including Senator Tim Kaine, have suggested that firing on shipwrecked or incapacitated survivors could constitute a war crime. Lawmakers from both parties are demanding the release of unedited video footage of the September 2 attack.

US Southern Command struck three suspected drug-smuggling vessels in international waters, killing eight men. As part of Trump’s anti-cartel campaign, over 90 suspects have died. Despite backlash and war crime concerns, the administration defends the strikes as lawful.

The US Southern Command said on Monday (Dec 15) that it carried out strikes on three vessels in international waters, killing eight men. It said that the operation was carried out on narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific. In his war against drug cartels, the United States struck more than 20 vessels in the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea near Venezuela. At least 90 suspected drug smugglers have been killed in the process. Despite criticism, the Trump administration, including the US president, have defended the legality of the strikes. The strikes are also seen as the precursor to US land strikes on Venezuela that Trump has said will soon start.

US Southern Command struck three suspected drug-smuggling vessels in international waters, killing eight men. As part of Trump’s anti-cartel campaign, over 90 suspects have died. Despite backlash and war crime concerns, the administration defends the strikes as lawful.

US conducts another boat strike in Pacific on Hegseth's order, kills 8 'male narco-terrorists'

The Caribbean nation of Trinidad and Tobago said Monday it had authorised US military aircraft to use its airports, amid growing fears Washington may be preparing an attack on nearby Venezuela.The archipelago of Trinidad and Tobago, situated just a dozen kilometers from Venezuela at its closest point, is a staunch backer of President Donald Trump's campaign of military and economic pressure on Caracas.Trinidad's foreign ministry said it had given the green light for US military aircraft to use its airports "in the coming weeks."The ministry said Washington would use them for "logistical" operations, including "facilitating supply replenishment and routine personnel rotations."Trinidad and Tobago's Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar has thrown open her country to US forces as Washington builds a major military deployment in the Caribbean.US officials say the operation aims to counter "narco-terrorists," but the Trump administration is particularly piling pressure on Venezuela and its leftist strongman Nicolas Maduro, whom Washington does not recognize as the legitimate president.In October, a US guided missile destroyer docked off the island of Trinidad for four days of joint drills, within firing range of Venezuela.Last month, a contingent of US Marines took part in exercises in the archipelago.The United States has also installed radar at a new airport on the island of Tobago, which Persad-Bissessar says is aimed at detecting Venezuelan drug trafficking and sanctions-busting oil deliveries.On Monday, Caracas accused Trinidad and Tobago of participating in the "theft" last week of Venezuelan oil after US forces seized a tanker they said was in breach of US sanctions.Washington said the move was aimed at Maduro's "regime," but Caracas decried it as an act of "international piracy."Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez accused Persad-Bissessar of having a "hostile agenda towards Venezuela" and reiterated Caracas would halt natural gas exploration with its neighbor.Trinidadian Foreign Minister Sean Sobers said the decision was part of a government commitment "to cooperation and collaboration in the pursuit of safety and security for Trinidad and Tobago and the wider region."

The archipelago of Trinidad and Tobago, situated just a dozen kilometres from Venezuela at its closest point, is a staunch backer of President Donald Trump's campaign of military and economic pressure on Caracas.

The Caribbean nation of Trinidad and Tobago said Monday it had authorised US military aircraft to use its airports, amid growing fears Washington may be preparing an attack on nearby Venezuela. The archipelago of Trinidad and Tobago, situated just a dozen kilometers from Venezuela at its closest point, is a staunch backer of President Donald Trump's campaign of military and economic pressure on Caracas. Trinidad's foreign ministry said it had given the green light for US military aircraft to use its airports "in the coming weeks." The ministry said Washington would use them for "logistical" operations, including "facilitating supply replenishment and routine personnel rotations." Trinidad and Tobago's Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar has thrown open her country to US forces as Washington builds a major military deployment in the Caribbean. US officials say the operation aims to counter "narco-terrorists," but the Trump administration is particularly piling pressure on Venezuela and its leftist strongman Nicolas Maduro, whom Washington does not recognize as the legitimate president. In October, a US guided missile destroyer docked off the island of Trinidad for four days of joint drills, within firing range of Venezuela. Last month, a contingent of US Marines took part in exercises in the archipelago. The United States has also installed radar at a new airport on the island of Tobago, which Persad-Bissessar says is aimed at detecting Venezuelan drug trafficking and sanctions-busting oil deliveries. On Monday, Caracas accused Trinidad and Tobago of participating in the "theft" last week of Venezuelan oil after US forces seized a tanker they said was in breach of US sanctions. Washington said the move was aimed at Maduro's "regime," but Caracas decried it as an act of "international piracy." Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez accused Persad-Bissessar of having a "hostile agenda towards Venezuela" and reiterated Caracas would halt natural gas exploration with its neighbor. Trinidadian Foreign Minister Sean Sobers said the decision was part of a government commitment "to cooperation and collaboration in the pursuit of safety and security for Trinidad and Tobago and the wider region."

The archipelago of Trinidad and Tobago, situated just a dozen kilometres from Venezuela at its closest point, is a staunch backer of President Donald Trump's campaign of military and economic pressure on Caracas.

US-Venezuela tensions: Trinidad, Tobago gives permission to US military aircraft to use its airports

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro sharply condemned the US seizure of an oil tanker from his country on Thursday (Dec 11), calling the move an act of "naval piracy" that has pushed tensions with Washington to a dangerous new level. His statement comes as the White House confirmed that the seized tanker is being brought to a US port and said the United States "does intend to seize the oil" on board the Venezuelan vessel. The tanker was intercepted off Venezuela’s coast in a dramatic raid in which American forces rappelled from a helicopter onto the deck.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-seizes-oil-tanker-off-venezuela-trump-warns-other-things-are-happening-watch-video-1765414525829">US seizes oil tanker off Venezuela, Trump warns 'other things are happening'. Watch video</a><h2>Maduro slams Trump's 'naval piracy'</h2>Slamming the US President Donald Trump administration's seizure of the Venezuelan oil tanker, Maduro said, "They kidnapped the crew, stole the ship and have inaugurated a new era, the era of criminal naval piracy in the Caribbean." Speaking during a televised event, he vowed that Venezuela would "secure all ships to guarantee the free trade of its oil around the world."Venezuela's foreign ministry also strongly denounced and condemned what it said was "blatant theft and an act of international piracy."Russia’s Vladimir Putin offered verbal support for Maduro in a phone call Thursday, though Russia’s capacity to assist is limited as its military remains tied down in Ukraine.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-you-re-sick-erika-kirk-calls-out-internet-ghouls-hunting-high-res-video-of-charlie-kirk-assassination-1765434803268">Erika Kirk shames 'sick' ghouls hunting high-res video of Charlie Kirk murder</a><h2>US to seize the oil?</h2>White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told the press that the United States intends to take possession of the oil on board. "The vessel will go to a US port, and the United States does intend to seize the oil," she said.Defending the seizure, she said, "We're not going to stand by and watch sanctioned vessels sail the seas with black-market oil, the proceeds of which will fuel narco-terrorism of rogue and illegitimate regimes around the world." US officials say the tanker was part of an illicit network used to move oil for Venezuela and Iran in violation of sanctions.Meanwhile, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, in a statement, said that the tanker seizure operation was aimed at the Maduro "regime". Earlier, she told a congressional hearing that the tanker operation was "pushing back on a regime that is systematically covering and flooding our country with deadly drugs".The seizure comes amid a major US naval buildup in the Caribbean and a series of lethal US strikes on alleged drug boats that have killed nearly 90 people. Maduro says the United States is laying the groundwork for regime change. &nbsp;

Maduro blasted the US for "naval piracy" after American forces seized a Venezuelan oil tanker in a helicopter raid. He says Washington "kidnapped" the crew and stole the ship, while the White House confirms it will seize the oil.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro sharply condemned the US seizure of an oil tanker from his country on Thursday (Dec 11), calling the move an act of "naval piracy" that has pushed tensions with Washington to a dangerous new level. His statement comes as the White House confirmed that the seized tanker is being brought to a US port and said the United States "does intend to seize the oil" on board the Venezuelan vessel. The tanker was intercepted off Venezuela’s coast in a dramatic raid in which American forces rappelled from a helicopter onto the deck. Also read | US seizes oil tanker off Venezuela, Trump warns 'other things are happening'. Watch video Maduro slams Trump's 'naval piracy' Slamming the US President Donald Trump administration's seizure of the Venezuelan oil tanker, Maduro said, "They kidnapped the crew, stole the ship and have inaugurated a new era, the era of criminal naval piracy in the Caribbean." Speaking during a televised event, he vowed that Venezuela would "secure all ships to guarantee the free trade of its oil around the world." Venezuela's foreign ministry also strongly denounced and condemned what it said was "blatant theft and an act of international piracy." Russia’s Vladimir Putin offered verbal support for Maduro in a phone call Thursday, though Russia’s capacity to assist is limited as its military remains tied down in Ukraine. Also read | Erika Kirk shames 'sick' ghouls hunting high-res video of Charlie Kirk murder US to seize the oil? White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told the press that the United States intends to take possession of the oil on board. "The vessel will go to a US port, and the United States does intend to seize the oil," she said. Defending the seizure, she said, "We're not going to stand by and watch sanctioned vessels sail the seas with black-market oil, the proceeds of which will fuel narco-terrorism of rogue and illegitimate regimes around the world." US officials say the tanker was part of an illicit network used to move oil for Venezuela and Iran in violation of sanctions. Meanwhile, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, in a statement, said that the tanker seizure operation was aimed at the Maduro "regime". Earlier, she told a congressional hearing that the tanker operation was "pushing back on a regime that is systematically covering and flooding our country with deadly drugs". The seizure comes amid a major US naval buildup in the Caribbean and a series of lethal US strikes on alleged drug boats that have killed nearly 90 people. Maduro says the United States is laying the groundwork for regime change.

Maduro blasted the US for "naval piracy" after American forces seized a Venezuelan oil tanker in a helicopter raid. He says Washington "kidnapped" the crew and stole the ship, while the White House confirms it will seize the oil.

Nicolas Maduro slams Trump admin's 'naval piracy' as White House confirms US will 'seize the oil' from Venezuelan tanker

US President Donald Trump said Thursday (Nov 27) that the US "very soon" would step up its efforts to stop the flow of Venezuelan drug trafficking "by land." The move could sharpen tensions with Venezuela, which has long accused Washington of using anti-narcotics operations as a cover to force regime change. Speaking to US troops via video from Mar-a-Lago on Thanksgiving, Trump claimed great success in stopping narco-terrorism via the sea route.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/xi-jinping-backs-nicolas-maduro-blasts-us-meddling-as-warships-circle-venezuela-1764051446049">Xi Jinping backs Nicolas Maduro, blasts US meddling as warships circle Venezuela, vows to protect Caracas' sovereignty</a><h2>What did Trump say about Venezuela?</h2>Speaking during a Thanksgiving video call with American troops, Trump said maritime trafficking from Venezuela had already been largely curbed. "We've almost stopped — it's about 85 per cent stopped by sea," he said. "And we'll be starting to stop them by land also. The land is easier, but that's going to start very soon," he told service members.Washington, in recent days, has sent a large deployment of US military to the region, carrying out a number of airstrikes on alleged "narco-terrorist" boats in the international waters there. Washington so far has announced strikes only in international waters, under an anti-drug campaign named Southern Spear. Public statements show that more than 20 operations have been conducted in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, resulting in at least 83 deaths. The US has not released evidence that those targeted were drug traffickers.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/sarah-beckstrom-one-of-the-national-guards-shot-near-white-house-dies-trump-says-other-soldier-in-very-bad-shape-1764290615212">Sarah Beckstrom, one of the National Guards shot near White House dies; Trump says other soldier ‘fighting for life’</a>Officially, the mission targets transnational crime and narcotics shipments. Venezuelan officials, however, maintain that the operation is a pretext for regime change and the removal of President Nicolás Maduro, whom the US labels a drug trafficker. Maduro rejects the accusation.&nbsp;

Trump said the US will soon boost efforts to block Venezuelan drug trafficking by land, claiming that trafficking via sea routes was already about 85 per cent stopped.

US President Donald Trump said Thursday (Nov 27) that the US "very soon" would step up its efforts to stop the flow of Venezuelan drug trafficking "by land." The move could sharpen tensions with Venezuela, which has long accused Washington of using anti-narcotics operations as a cover to force regime change. Speaking to US troops via video from Mar-a-Lago on Thanksgiving, Trump claimed great success in stopping narco-terrorism via the sea route. Also read | Xi Jinping backs Nicolas Maduro, blasts US meddling as warships circle Venezuela, vows to protect Caracas' sovereignty What did Trump say about Venezuela? Speaking during a Thanksgiving video call with American troops, Trump said maritime trafficking from Venezuela had already been largely curbed. "We've almost stopped — it's about 85 per cent stopped by sea," he said. "And we'll be starting to stop them by land also. The land is easier, but that's going to start very soon," he told service members. Washington, in recent days, has sent a large deployment of US military to the region, carrying out a number of airstrikes on alleged "narco-terrorist" boats in the international waters there. Washington so far has announced strikes only in international waters, under an anti-drug campaign named Southern Spear. Public statements show that more than 20 operations have been conducted in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, resulting in at least 83 deaths. The US has not released evidence that those targeted were drug traffickers. Also read | Sarah Beckstrom, one of the National Guards shot near White House dies; Trump says other soldier ‘fighting for life’ Officially, the mission targets transnational crime and narcotics shipments. Venezuelan officials, however, maintain that the operation is a pretext for regime change and the removal of President Nicolás Maduro, whom the US labels a drug trafficker. Maduro rejects the accusation.

Trump said the US will soon boost efforts to block Venezuelan drug trafficking by land, claiming that trafficking via sea routes was already about 85 per cent stopped.

Trump signals new push to choke off drug flow, says land crackdowns against Venezuela are coming 'very soon'

Chinese President Xi Jinping has reaffirmed Beijing's backing for Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, sending a birthday message that pledged continued support for the country's sovereignty at a time of rising tension with the United States. The letter, released by Venezuela's Foreign Ministry, describes China and Venezuela as "intimate friends, dear brothers, and good partners". Xi vowed that Beijing would continue to support Caracas in protecting its national security, stability, and dignity.<h2>China slams the US</h2>The Chinese premier condemned what he called foreign interference in Venezuela's internal affairs, a line seen as a direct response to recent US military moves in the region. He said China would keep supporting Venezuela in "safeguarding its sovereignty and national security, the dignity of the nation, and social stability".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/chinese-man-with-pakistan-travel-history-caught-filming-sensitive-sites-after-sneaking-into-india-from-nepal-1764036527773">Chinese man with Pakistan travel history caught filming sensitive sites after sneaking into India from Nepal</a>His statement comes at a time when Washington has deployed nearly a dozen warships and around 12,000 sailors and Marines to waters off the Venezuelan coast as part of a counter-narcotics and maritime security mission. Venezuela and its allies say the operation is a cover for political pressure on Maduro. "China resolutely opposes the meddling of external forces in Venezuela’s internal affairs under any pretext," Xi wrote, repeating Beijing's longstanding position on non-intervention.Beijing's stance mirrors comments made last week by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, who criticised the US campaign known as Operation Southern Spear. Announced by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, the operation targets what Washington calls narco-terrorist networks and labels the Cartel de los Soles, which American officials allege Maduro leads, as a foreign terrorist organisation. Mao said China supports the "Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace" and urged Washington to take steps that "choose a course of action conducive to peace and stability" rather than escalate tensions.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-he-d-be-proud-if-us-carries-out-strikes-inside-mexico-here-s-why-1763439216625">Trump says he’d be 'proud' if US carries out strikes inside Mexico. Here's why</a><h2>US ally Russia also backs Venezuela</h2>Xi's letter came as Russia also voiced support for Maduro. Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his own message calling Maduro "dear friend" a term he has previously used for US President Donald Trump. He also promised to deepen the "strategic partnership" between Moscow and Caracas. Both letters were shared publicly by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil.

China has thrown full support behind Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, with President Xi Jinping calling Caracas an intimate friend and vowing to defend its sovereignty against US pressure. Scroll for full story.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has reaffirmed Beijing's backing for Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, sending a birthday message that pledged continued support for the country's sovereignty at a time of rising tension with the United States. The letter, released by Venezuela's Foreign Ministry, describes China and Venezuela as "intimate friends, dear brothers, and good partners". Xi vowed that Beijing would continue to support Caracas in protecting its national security, stability, and dignity. China slams the US The Chinese premier condemned what he called foreign interference in Venezuela's internal affairs, a line seen as a direct response to recent US military moves in the region. He said China would keep supporting Venezuela in "safeguarding its sovereignty and national security, the dignity of the nation, and social stability". Also read | Chinese man with Pakistan travel history caught filming sensitive sites after sneaking into India from Nepal His statement comes at a time when Washington has deployed nearly a dozen warships and around 12,000 sailors and Marines to waters off the Venezuelan coast as part of a counter-narcotics and maritime security mission. Venezuela and its allies say the operation is a cover for political pressure on Maduro. "China resolutely opposes the meddling of external forces in Venezuela’s internal affairs under any pretext," Xi wrote, repeating Beijing's longstanding position on non-intervention. Beijing's stance mirrors comments made last week by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, who criticised the US campaign known as Operation Southern Spear. Announced by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, the operation targets what Washington calls narco-terrorist networks and labels the Cartel de los Soles, which American officials allege Maduro leads, as a foreign terrorist organisation. Mao said China supports the "Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace" and urged Washington to take steps that "choose a course of action conducive to peace and stability" rather than escalate tensions. Also read | Trump says he’d be 'proud' if US carries out strikes inside Mexico. Here's why US ally Russia also backs Venezuela Xi's letter came as Russia also voiced support for Maduro. Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his own message calling Maduro "dear friend" a term he has previously used for US President Donald Trump. He also promised to deepen the "strategic partnership" between Moscow and Caracas. Both letters were shared publicly by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil.

China has thrown full support behind Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, with President Xi Jinping calling Caracas an intimate friend and vowing to defend its sovereignty against US pressure. Scroll for full story.

Xi Jinping backs Nicolas Maduro, blasts US meddling as warships circle Venezuela, vows to protect Caracas' sovereignty

The Pentagon on Sunday (Nov 16) announced that it had carried out the 21st known strike on an alleged drug trafficking boat in international waters. US Southern Command confirmed on Sunday that American forces (on Saturday) carried out a strike on a boat moving along a well-known smuggling route in the eastern Pacific.<h2>American strikes continue; over 80 alleged "narco terrorists" killed</h2>In a post online US Southern Command said that Intelligence showed the vessel was carrying narcotics. "Intelligence confirmed that the vessel was involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, transiting along a known narco-trafficking route, and carrying narcotics". It added that "Three male narcoterrorists aboard the vessel were killed," and that "The vessel was trafficking narcotics in the Eastern Pacific and was struck in international waters."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">On Nov. 15, at the direction of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization. Intelligence confirmed that the vessel was involved in illicit narcotics smuggling,… <a href="https://t.co/iM1PhIsroj">pic.twitter.com/iM1PhIsroj</a>&mdash; U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) <a href="https://twitter.com/Southcom/status/1990147866397221102?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This brings the total number of deaths linked to these "narco-terrorism" operations to 83. Officials say the mission is designed to choke off the drug trade before it reaches US shores, and reports suggest they have used everything from fighter jets to drones to do it. Citing a Defense Department official, CNN reports that the US carried out the twentieth strike just last week.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-open-to-talks-with-maduro-even-as-washington-slaps-terror-tag-on-his-alleged-cartel-1763341987551">Trump says open to talks with Maduro even as Washington slaps terror tag on his alleged cartel</a>The effort has drawn heavy fire. Colombia’s president said last week he would halt intelligence cooperation with Washington until the attacks stop. Legal experts in the US have also warned that the campaign could violate both American and international law. The Justice Department, for its part, has told Congress it does not need approval to continue the strikes.<h2>US moves to designate alleged Maduro-led cartel a terrorist group</h2>Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday announced that Washington plans to formally classify the Cartel de los Soles as a foreign terrorist organisation. The US argues the group, which it says is tied directly to Maduro and other senior officials, works with known outfits like Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel and fuels violence and drug trafficking across the region.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-strike-kills-3-in-caribbean-critics-say-no-justification-under-international-law-1762077521529">US strike kills 3 in Caribbean, critics say ‘no justification under international law’</a>"Cartel de los Soles by and with other designated FTOs, including Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel are responsible for terrorist violence throughout our hemisphere as well as for trafficking drugs into the United States and Europe," he said in a statement. Caracas calls the accusations absurd and claims the growing US military presence in the Caribbean is cover for regime change.Washington maintains that Maduro is an illegitimate leader and a drug trafficker, a charge he rejects. Doubling down, Rubio said, "Neither Maduro nor his cronies represent Venezuela's legitimate government." He insisted that the US will continue to use every tool available to cut off the funding and reach of groups it considers narco terrorists.

The US carried out its 21st strike on a suspected drug boat in the eastern Pacific, killing three men and pushing the total death toll in these operations to 83. 

The Pentagon on Sunday (Nov 16) announced that it had carried out the 21st known strike on an alleged drug trafficking boat in international waters. US Southern Command confirmed on Sunday that American forces (on Saturday) carried out a strike on a boat moving along a well-known smuggling route in the eastern Pacific. American strikes continue; over 80 alleged "narco terrorists" killed In a post online US Southern Command said that Intelligence showed the vessel was carrying narcotics. "Intelligence confirmed that the vessel was involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, transiting along a known narco-trafficking route, and carrying narcotics". It added that "Three male narcoterrorists aboard the vessel were killed," and that "The vessel was trafficking narcotics in the Eastern Pacific and was struck in international waters."

The US carried out its 21st strike on a suspected drug boat in the eastern Pacific, killing three men and pushing the total death toll in these operations to 83.&nbsp;

Pentagon confirms 21st strike on alleged drug boat, kills three in international waters. Watch video

us-venezuela

Us Venezuela, News on Us Venezuela, stories on Us Venezuela, articles on Us Venezuela, Us Venezuela stories at Wion, Us Venezuela news, Us Venezuela latest news

us venezuela

‘Venezuela retains sovereignty’: Delcy Rodriguez defends sweeping US oil deal

'Go home to mom. Take him to mommy': Trump to protestor during NYC event | WATCH

US lifts sanctions on Venezuela’s interim leader Delcy Rodriguez

'You couldn’t make a deal... ', says Rubio at Senate hearing on Maduro’s capture

'Venezuela is going to be free with support from Trump': Maria Corina Machado

US seizes Venezuela-linked tanker as Trump set to meet Maria Corina Machado

US used sonic weapon in Maduro op in Venezuela? Havana Syndrome lawyer says..

Venezuela bound China-flagged supertankers reverses amid US crackdown: Report

Big Oil Concern on Venezuela: Once Bitten, Twice Shy

Trump makes bold Venezuela oil play, but Exxon says 'uninvestable' | Deets here

Trump tells oil executives US will make decisions on Venezuela's vast reserves

US seizes another oil tanker as Trump cracks down on Venezuela exports to Russia

Senate clears resolution to restrain Trump from further action in Venezuela

'Only time will tell', says US President Donald Trump over US governance on Venezuela

Russia sends submarine to shadow oil tanker chased by US near Venezuela | Watch

Trump ex-aide reveals Russia's bizarre 'Venezuela for Ukraine' deal | Watch

Guyana–Venezuela oil dispute: How the US entered the picture

Why Venezuela is considered a major launchpad for global cocaine shipments

Inside Delta Force, elite US military unit that captured Venezuela’s president

Russia, China blast US's ‘cowboy behaviour’ at UN, back Venezuela's sovereignty

‘These acts will not go unpunished’: Venezuela warns after US seizes oil tanker

WATCH | US intercepts second oil tanker off Venezuela over ‘illicit movement’

‘Venezuelan regime is intolerable’: Rubio defends Trump amid war concerns

'Export operations for crude...', says Venezuela despite Trump 'blockade'

Trump targets Venezuela with ‘total and complete blockade’ of oil tankers

US conducts another boat strike in Pacific on Hegseth's order, kills 8