The United States on Wednesday (Jul 29) launched fresh strikes on Iran. In a post on X, US CENTCOM said that the strikes, which began at 8 pm ET, were a "powerful response to attempted Iranian attacks on U.S. forces based in the Middle East." The strikes come hours after US President Donald Trump vowed to hit back hard at Iran in retaliation for Tehran's attacks on US bases in Jordan. These mark the first attacks on Iranian soil in nearly a week.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">U.S. forces began launching strikes against Iran at 8 p.m. ET today. The strikes are a powerful response to yesterday&#39;s attempted Iranian attacks on U.S. forces based in the Middle East.&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2082623345682518024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 30, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/oil-prices-jump-over-3-brent-tops-86-after-us-says-it-intercepted-iranian-missile-attack-1785285962484">Oil prices jump over 3% after US says it intercepted Iranian missile attack</a><h2>Iran reports attacks near vital sites</h2>Iranian media reported on Thursday, citing regional authorities, that attacks occurred around Iran's Qeshm Island and Abadan city. Notably, both these sites are important to Tehran: Qeshm controls the vital Strait of Hormuz oil shipping lanes as a heavily fortified military base, while Abadan is a historic petroleum and refining powerhouse in the Khuzestan province."At 04:00 am (0030 GMT), a point near Qeshm was attacked by the American enemy military," said Ahmad Nafisi, the deputy governor of the southern Hormozgan Province, according to news agency Mehr."Points around Abadan city were attacked by missiles by the terrorist enemy of America," the Fars news agency reported, citing the deputy governor of Khuzestan.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/very-unimpactful-trump-downplays-russian-support-for-iran-promises-to-ask-putin-about-zelensky-s-claims-1785200335134">'Very unimpactful': Trump downplays Russian support for Iran, promises to 'ask Putin' about Zelensky's claims</a><h2>US completes ‘heavy wave’ of strikes: CENTCOM</h2>In another X post published just hours after its first post, &nbsp;the US Central Command said that the United States military has completed a "heavy wave" of strikes against Iran.CENTCOM said late Wednesday that its forces "successfully completed a heavy wave of strikes against Iran in response to yesterday's attempted missile attacks on U.S. forces," and struck dozens of Islamic Revolutionary Guard targets, including military command centres. “The strikes aimed to further diminish threats posed by Iran and its proxies to American forces, commercial shipping, and neighbouring Gulf countries,” it said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://t.co/kk3XPDc73G">https://t.co/kk3XPDc73G</a>&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2082651747869147214?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 30, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

'Powerful response': US launches revenge strikes on Iran after Trump vow

The United States on Wednesday (Jul 29) launched fresh strikes on Iran. In a post on X, US CENTCOM said that the strikes, which began at 8 pm ET, were a "powerful response to attempted Iranian attacks on U.S. forces based in the Middle East." The strikes come hours after US President Donald Trump vowed to hit back hard at Iran in retaliation for Tehran's attacks on US bases in Jordan. These mark the first attacks on Iranian soil in nearly a week.

'Powerful response': US launches revenge strikes on Iran after Trump vow

'Powerful response': US launches fresh revenge strikes on Iran after Trump vow to 'hit back hard'

US President Donald Trump is considering whether to launch a renewed military campaign against Iran, with the Pentagon preparing plans for an intensive 2-week air operation targeting Tehran’s missile capabilities.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-re-going-to-be-hitting-them-very-hard-trump-vows-heavy-strike-after-us-intercepts-iranian-missile-attack-1785353856416">‘We're going to be hitting them very hard’: Trump vows heavy strike after US intercepts Iranian missile attack</a>&nbsp;According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the discussions, the proposed campaign has been developed by US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Admiral Brad Cooper and is designed to significantly weaken Iran’s missile infrastructure.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/he-wants-me-to-stay-involved-trump-says-netanyahu-publicised-iran-intel-to-keep-us-engaged-1785282887695">'He wants me to stay involved': Trump says Netanyahu publicised Iran intel to keep US engaged</a>&nbsp;The report said the proposal would mark a major escalation from the previous round of US strikes against Iran. However, it added that Trump has not taken a final decision and is also weighing a more limited military response that would preserve the possibility of diplomatic engagement.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/are-you-an-indian-on-an-h-1b-visa-new-us-bill-could-make-getting-green-card-easier-1785353532862">Are you an Indian on an H-1B visa? New US bill could make getting Green Card easier</a>&nbsp;The deliberations come as Washington assesses its next steps following heightened tensions with Tehran, with military planners presenting multiple options to the White House, The Wall Street Journal reported.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pickaxe-mountain-did-not-come-up-israel-denies-nuclear-site-was-discussed-in-trump-netanyahu-meeting-1785267444641">'Pickaxe Mountain did not come up': Israel denies nuclear site was discussed in Trump-Netanyahu meeting</a>&nbsp;Neither the White House nor the Pentagon has publicly commented on the reported plans.The United States and Iran have remained locked in a prolonged confrontation over Tehran’s nuclear programme, regional influence and support for armed groups across West Asia. Tensions have repeatedly flared into direct military exchanges, raising fears of a wider regional conflict.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/islamic-republic-will-never-make-a-deal-with-the-us-iran-deputy-speaker-echoes-araghchi-s-remark-1785197204970">'Islamic Republic will never make a deal with the US': Iran deputy speaker echoes Araghchi’s remark</a>

US President Donald Trump is considering a CENTCOM-developed two-week air strike campaign targeting Iran's missile infrastructure, though he is also weighing more limited military options to preserve potential diplomacy.

US President Donald Trump is considering whether to launch a renewed military campaign against Iran, with the Pentagon preparing plans for an intensive 2-week air operation targeting Tehran’s missile capabilities. Also read: ‘We're going to be hitting them very hard’: Trump vows heavy strike after US intercepts Iranian missile attack According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the discussions, the proposed campaign has been developed by US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Admiral Brad Cooper and is designed to significantly weaken Iran’s missile infrastructure. Also read: 'He wants me to stay involved': Trump says Netanyahu publicised Iran intel to keep US engaged The report said the proposal would mark a major escalation from the previous round of US strikes against Iran. However, it added that Trump has not taken a final decision and is also weighing a more limited military response that would preserve the possibility of diplomatic engagement. Also read: Are you an Indian on an H-1B visa? New US bill could make getting Green Card easier The deliberations come as Washington assesses its next steps following heightened tensions with Tehran, with military planners presenting multiple options to the White House, The Wall Street Journal reported. Also read: 'Pickaxe Mountain did not come up': Israel denies nuclear site was discussed in Trump-Netanyahu meeting Neither the White House nor the Pentagon has publicly commented on the reported plans. The United States and Iran have remained locked in a prolonged confrontation over Tehran’s nuclear programme, regional influence and support for armed groups across West Asia. Tensions have repeatedly flared into direct military exchanges, raising fears of a wider regional conflict. Also read: 'Islamic Republic will never make a deal with the US': Iran deputy speaker echoes Araghchi’s remark

US President Donald Trump is considering a CENTCOM-developed two-week air strike campaign targeting Iran's missile infrastructure, though he is also weighing more limited military options to preserve potential diplomacy.

Pentagon prepares 2-week Iran air plan as Trump weighs next move: Report

The Trump administration is facing growing scrutiny over the handling of US military casualty records linked to the Iran war. A reported discrepancy on the Pentagon’s casualty website has triggered criticism from lawmakers, military analysts, and opponents who accuse officials of changing classifications to reduce the visible impact of American losses. According to reports, four recent US military deaths temporarily disappeared from the Defense Department’s casualty reporting website. When they returned, they were listed under a different category called “Overseas Operations” instead of Operation Epic Fury.

Pentagon Faces Backlash Over US Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Under Fire

Iran on Wednesday rejected a proposal from Oman for regional joint management of the Strait of Hormuz, pushing for more control. A senior Iranian official said that the plan had no chance of succeeding. Iran and Oman should manage Hormuz between them based on their respective area of control, without the involvement of other powers. Meanwhile, the US and Saudi Arabia carried out joint strikes in Iraq in retalliation for drone attacks on Saudi oil targets, a sharp escalation since last weekend when Trump abruptly suspended bombing operations.&nbsp;<h2>Iran rebuffed Oman's proposal for Hormuz management</h2>A framework to end the war has collapsed over the Strait of Hormuz. Oman had earlier this week proposed a plan for the joint management of the Strait of Hormuz that would allow the payment of voluntary service charges. But an Iranian official said that the proposal was unreasonable. Iran doesn't want a 50-50 arrangement with Oman, though it values Oman as a neighbour.&nbsp;“Oman proposed to us the creation of a route in the Strait of Hormuz, with 50 per cent of it located in our territorial waters and 50 per cent in Omani territorial waters. The route for ships to pass through the Strait of Hormuz could involve entering through our waters and exiting through Omani territorial waters,” said Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi to a state TV broadcast on Friday. Iran practically wants complete control of inbound and partial control of outbound traffic, and also wants to charge a toll. The US had been urging ships to take the route in the Omani waterways, which was a violation of the framework agreed between the two sides. This led to an escalation as the US and Iran continued attacking each other for 13 days consecutively, until last Friday.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kremlin-ukraine-iranian-ship-attack-caspian-sea-russia-1785256844141">Russia says Ukrainian attack on Iranian ship should be treated as attack on Iran</a><h2>US and Saudi Arabia jointly attacked Iraq&nbsp;</h2>Washington and Riyadh launched a joint operation in Iraq against Iran-backed armed groups. The US CENTCOM said early Wednesday that it had carried out a joint airstrike at an Iran-backed militia, responsible for attacks on US bases and Saudi oil infrastructure. The Iran-backed militia, Iraq's Popular Mobilisation Forces, is a powerful paramilitary ​group and part of the formal Iraqi security forces. The PMF said that at least 20 members were killed while 32 others were wounded in the US-Saudi strikes. In a statement, the PMF condemned the attacks, calling them a "dangerous escalation". The Islamic Resistance of Iraq has denied the claims of the Kingdom that the paramilitary group targeted petroleum infrastructure in Saudi Arabia and called it “fabrication”, and warned of a harsh response. Iran's foreign ministry on Wednesday condemned US-Saudi strikes in Iraq, calling them a "gross violation" of the UN Charter and international law. Iran accused the US and Israel of expanding the war in the region.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Iran rejects Oman's Strait of Hormuz management proposal as the US and Saudi Arabia launch joint strikes on Iran-backed militias in Iraq, escalating tensions.

Iran on Wednesday rejected a proposal from Oman for regional joint management of the Strait of Hormuz, pushing for more control. A senior Iranian official said that the plan had no chance of succeeding. Iran and Oman should manage Hormuz between them based on their respective area of control, without the involvement of other powers. Meanwhile, the US and Saudi Arabia carried out joint strikes in Iraq in retalliation for drone attacks on Saudi oil targets, a sharp escalation since last weekend when Trump abruptly suspended bombing operations. Iran rebuffed Oman's proposal for Hormuz management A framework to end the war has collapsed over the Strait of Hormuz. Oman had earlier this week proposed a plan for the joint management of the Strait of Hormuz that would allow the payment of voluntary service charges. But an Iranian official said that the proposal was unreasonable. Iran doesn't want a 50-50 arrangement with Oman, though it values Oman as a neighbour. “Oman proposed to us the creation of a route in the Strait of Hormuz, with 50 per cent of it located in our territorial waters and 50 per cent in Omani territorial waters. The route for ships to pass through the Strait of Hormuz could involve entering through our waters and exiting through Omani territorial waters,” said Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi to a state TV broadcast on Friday. Iran practically wants complete control of inbound and partial control of outbound traffic, and also wants to charge a toll. The US had been urging ships to take the route in the Omani waterways, which was a violation of the framework agreed between the two sides. This led to an escalation as the US and Iran continued attacking each other for 13 days consecutively, until last Friday. Also Read: Russia says Ukrainian attack on Iranian ship should be treated as attack on Iran US and Saudi Arabia jointly attacked Iraq Washington and Riyadh launched a joint operation in Iraq against Iran-backed armed groups. The US CENTCOM said early Wednesday that it had carried out a joint airstrike at an Iran-backed militia, responsible for attacks on US bases and Saudi oil infrastructure. The Iran-backed militia, Iraq's Popular Mobilisation Forces, is a powerful paramilitary group and part of the formal Iraqi security forces. The PMF said that at least 20 members were killed while 32 others were wounded in the US-Saudi strikes. In a statement, the PMF condemned the attacks, calling them a "dangerous escalation". The Islamic Resistance of Iraq has denied the claims of the Kingdom that the paramilitary group targeted petroleum infrastructure in Saudi Arabia and called it “fabrication”, and warned of a harsh response. Iran's foreign ministry on Wednesday condemned US-Saudi strikes in Iraq, calling them a "gross violation" of the UN Charter and international law. Iran accused the US and Israel of expanding the war in the region.

Iran rejects Oman's Strait of Hormuz management proposal as the US and Saudi Arabia launch joint strikes on Iran-backed militias in Iraq, escalating tensions.

Iran rejects Oman's Strait of Hormuz plan as US-Saudi strikes hit Iraq

The United States and Saudi Arabia carried out strikes against Iraq, killing at least 10 members of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), a former paramilitary alliance now integrated into the country’s security forces. The attack came after Riyadh claimed that its forces had intercepted drones targeting oil facilities in eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia blamed Iran-backed groups operating in Iraq for the alleged attacks, while the groups rejected the accusations as “fabrications”.According to AFP, the PMF confirmed that several personnel were killed and others injured, while multiple buildings and properties were damaged in the attacks.Also read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-bomb-destroy-trump-s-latest-iran-warning-sends-oil-prices-soaring-1784776955794"> ‘Will bomb and destroy...’: Trump’s latest Iran warning sends oil prices soaring</a>“These attacks resulted in the martyrdom of a number of personnel and injuries to others, as well as material damage to several buildings and properties,” PMF said in a statement.In a statement, the PMF, also known as Hashed al-Shaabi, said that at least 20 memebers “were martyred and another 32 wounded according to a preliminary toll.”The PMF condemned the strikes as a “dangerous escalation” and accused Washington and Riyadh of violating Iraq’s sovereignty by targeting what it described as official security institutions.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-iran-secretly-ship-70-million-barrels-of-oil-to-china-report-claims-6-billion-crude-exported-before-blockade-restored-1784435146287">Did Iran secretly ship 70 million barrels of oil to China? Report claims $6 billion crude exported before blockade restored</a>The alliance was formed in 2014 to fight jihadists and was later integrated into Iraq’s armed forces. However, several Iran-backed factions within the PMF have continued to operate independently and have been accused of carrying out attacks against US interests in the region.The strikes come amid rising tensions in the Middle East, where Iraq has often found itself caught between its two major allies – Washington and Tehran. Iran-backed armed groups have previously claimed hundreds of attacks on US bases in Iraq and across the region.Iraq’s Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, who assumed office this year with US support, has pledged to bring pro-Iran armed factions under greater state control and push for weapons to be handed over. However, the move has faced resistance from powerful groups within the country.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

US-Saudi strikes on Iraq killed at least 20 PMF members after Riyadh blamed Iran-backed groups for drone attacks on oil facilities. The deadly assault comes amid escalating tensions in the Middle East.

The United States and Saudi Arabia carried out strikes against Iraq, killing at least 10 members of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), a former paramilitary alliance now integrated into the country’s security forces. The attack came after Riyadh claimed that its forces had intercepted drones targeting oil facilities in eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia blamed Iran-backed groups operating in Iraq for the alleged attacks, while the groups rejected the accusations as “fabrications”. According to AFP, the PMF confirmed that several personnel were killed and others injured, while multiple buildings and properties were damaged in the attacks. Also read | ‘Will bomb and destroy...’: Trump’s latest Iran warning sends oil prices soaring “These attacks resulted in the martyrdom of a number of personnel and injuries to others, as well as material damage to several buildings and properties,” PMF said in a statement. In a statement, the PMF, also known as Hashed al-Shaabi, said that at least 20 memebers “were martyred and another 32 wounded according to a preliminary toll.” The PMF condemned the strikes as a “dangerous escalation” and accused Washington and Riyadh of violating Iraq’s sovereignty by targeting what it described as official security institutions. Also read | Did Iran secretly ship 70 million barrels of oil to China? Report claims $6 billion crude exported before blockade restored The alliance was formed in 2014 to fight jihadists and was later integrated into Iraq’s armed forces. However, several Iran-backed factions within the PMF have continued to operate independently and have been accused of carrying out attacks against US interests in the region. The strikes come amid rising tensions in the Middle East, where Iraq has often found itself caught between its two major allies – Washington and Tehran. Iran-backed armed groups have previously claimed hundreds of attacks on US bases in Iraq and across the region. Iraq’s Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, who assumed office this year with US support, has pledged to bring pro-Iran armed factions under greater state control and push for weapons to be handed over. However, the move has faced resistance from powerful groups within the country. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

US-Saudi strikes on Iraq killed at least 20 PMF members after Riyadh blamed Iran-backed groups for drone attacks on oil facilities. The deadly assault escalated tensions in the Middle East.

‘Dangerous escalation’: US, Saudi strike Iran-backed group in Iraq; at least 20 killed

Oil prices surged more than 3 per cent in early Asian trading on Wednesday (Jul 29) after the United States military said it had intercepted multiple ballistic missiles launched by Iran. At around 0015 GMT, US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) rose 3.67 per cent to $82.17 a barrel, while Brent crude climbed 3.39 per cent to $86.94 a barrel.The sharp gains came after US Central Command (CENTCOM) said Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) had launched multiple ballistic missiles targeting US forces in the Middle East.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-avoids-higher-us-tariff-secures-lower-10-rate-here-s-how-1784854529326">India avoids higher US tariff, secures lower 10% rate. Here's how</a><h2>US intercepts Iranian missiles</h2>"At 5:45 pm ET today, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces launched multiple ballistic missiles from Iran in an attempted surprise attack on US forces based in the Middle East," CENTCOM said in a post on X.It added that all of the missiles were successfully intercepted, without disclosing the locations that were targeted.The latest exchange shattered a days-long pause in direct attacks between Washington and Tehran. The two sides had largely held fire over the weekend after nearly two weeks of nightly US strikes on Iran and repeated Iranian missile and drone attacks targeting American allies across the Gulf.The current escalation began in mid-July after Iran attacked several ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil shipping route.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-iran-has-evil-intentions-vows-it-will-never-get-nuclear-weapons-rubio-warns-iran-will-continue-to-pay-a-very-heavy-price-1784857820016">Trump warns Iran has 'evil intentions', vows it will 'never' get nuclear weapons</a><h2>Fears of wider regional conflict resurface</h2>Oil prices had fallen sharply during the weekend lull as markets grew hopeful that tensions were easing. Investor sentiment was further supported after US President Donald Trump said there was a "good chance" of progress in negotiations aimed at ending the conflict.However, Tuesday's missile launch reignited fears of a wider regional conflict that could disrupt crude supplies from the Middle East, prompting traders to push oil prices sharply higher.

Global oil prices rose more than 3% after the US military said it intercepted multiple ballistic missiles launched by Iran at American forces in the Middle East, reigniting fears of a wider regional conflict and potential disruptions to crude supplies.

Oil prices surged more than 3 per cent in early Asian trading on Wednesday (Jul 29) after the United States military said it had intercepted multiple ballistic missiles launched by Iran. At around 0015 GMT, US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) rose 3.67 per cent to $82.17 a barrel, while Brent crude climbed 3.39 per cent to $86.94 a barrel. The sharp gains came after US Central Command (CENTCOM) said Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) had launched multiple ballistic missiles targeting US forces in the Middle East. Also read | India avoids higher US tariff, secures lower 10% rate. Here's how US intercepts Iranian missiles "At 5:45 pm ET today, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces launched multiple ballistic missiles from Iran in an attempted surprise attack on US forces based in the Middle East," CENTCOM said in a post on X. It added that all of the missiles were successfully intercepted, without disclosing the locations that were targeted. The latest exchange shattered a days-long pause in direct attacks between Washington and Tehran. The two sides had largely held fire over the weekend after nearly two weeks of nightly US strikes on Iran and repeated Iranian missile and drone attacks targeting American allies across the Gulf. The current escalation began in mid-July after Iran attacked several ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil shipping route. Also read | Trump warns Iran has 'evil intentions', vows it will 'never' get nuclear weapons Fears of wider regional conflict resurface Oil prices had fallen sharply during the weekend lull as markets grew hopeful that tensions were easing. Investor sentiment was further supported after US President Donald Trump said there was a "good chance" of progress in negotiations aimed at ending the conflict. However, Tuesday's missile launch reignited fears of a wider regional conflict that could disrupt crude supplies from the Middle East, prompting traders to push oil prices sharply higher.

Global oil prices rose more than 3% after the US military said it intercepted multiple ballistic missiles launched by Iran at American forces in the Middle East, reigniting fears of a wider regional conflict and potential disruptions to crude supplies.

Oil prices jump over 3% after US says it intercepted Iranian missile attack

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched multiple ballistic missiles at US forces in West Asia on Tuesday (July 28) in the first reported attack since US President Donald Trump halted strikes against Iran. According to the US Central Command (CENTCOM), the missiles were fired in what it described as an attempted surprise attack. The military said all of the incoming missiles were successfully intercepted and that no immediate damage or casualties had been reported.&nbsp;“At 5:45 p.m. ET today, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces launched multiple ballistic missiles from Iran in an attempted surprise attack on US forces based in the Middle East. All Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted. US forces remain vigilant and at a high state of readiness,” CENTCOM said in a post on X.&nbsp;The missile launch marks a fresh escalation in tensions between Tehran and Washington, coming after Trump ordered a halt to US strikes on Iran. US officials have not yet announced any immediate military response to the attack.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard fired multiple ballistic missiles at US forces in the Middle East, but CENTCOM confirmed all incoming missiles were successfully intercepted without casualties or damage.  

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched multiple ballistic missiles at US forces in West Asia on Tuesday (July 28) in the first reported attack since US President Donald Trump halted strikes against Iran. According to the US Central Command (CENTCOM), the missiles were fired in what it described as an attempted surprise attack. The military said all of the incoming missiles were successfully intercepted and that no immediate damage or casualties had been reported. “At 5:45 p.m. ET today, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces launched multiple ballistic missiles from Iran in an attempted surprise attack on US forces based in the Middle East. All Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted. US forces remain vigilant and at a high state of readiness,” CENTCOM said in a post on X. The missile launch marks a fresh escalation in tensions between Tehran and Washington, coming after Trump ordered a halt to US strikes on Iran. US officials have not yet announced any immediate military response to the attack.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard fired multiple ballistic missiles at US forces in the Middle East, but CENTCOM confirmed all incoming missiles were successfully intercepted without casualties or damage. &nbsp;

Iran launches first attack on US forces since Trump halted strikes, missiles intercepted

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Jul 27) dismissed suggestions that Russia has played a significant role in supporting Iran during its conflict with the United States, saying any assistance Moscow may have provided has been "very unimpactful."&nbsp;Trump's remarks came after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of supplying satellite intelligence to Iran to help it target US military bases and Gulf state infrastructure. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he would seek clarification directly from Russian President Vladimir Putin."We'll find out if that's true. I'll ask Putin about it. We'll find out," Trump said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zelensky-sacks-ukraine-army-chief-oleksandr-syrskyi-offers-new-role-to-sacked-defence-minister-in-major-military-shake-up-1784685434535">Zelensky sacks Ukraine army chief Oleksandr Syrskyi, offers new role to sacked defence minister in major military shake-up</a><h2>'We've knocked the hell out of Iran'</h2>The US president argued that any Russian support had failed to alter the course of the conflict, asserting that American military operations had severely weakened Iran."It hasn't had much impact because we've knocked the hell out of it (Iran)," Trump said."They may be providing support, but if they are, it hasn't worked out because they (Iran) have no army, they have no air force, they have no navy, they have nothing," he added.Trump also cited Venezuela as an example to argue that Russian military equipment had not proven particularly effective. "They (Russia) gave Venezuela a lot of equipment. Venezuela had all Russian equipment. How did that work? Not too good," he said.While expressing scepticism over Zelensky's claims, Trump added that even if Moscow had provided assistance, it had made little difference. "I don't think they've been doing it, certainly not at a high level. And if they have, it has been very unimpactful," he said.<h2>Zelensky alleges Russian satellite support</h2>Trump's comments came after Zelensky made one of his strongest accusations yet against Moscow, claiming Ukrainian intelligence had tracked Russian satellite surveillance of US military installations and Gulf state infrastructure before Iranian strikes.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-avoids-higher-us-tariff-secures-lower-10-rate-here-s-how-1784854529326">India avoids higher US tariff, secures lower 10% rate. Here's how</a>In a post on X, the Ukrainian president said he would share the intelligence with Kyiv's international partners. "I will instruct our intelligence to share with our partners the information we have regarding Russia's new assistance to the Iranian regime," Zelensky wrote.He alleged that since the beginning of July, Ukrainian intelligence had observed active Russian satellite monitoring of Gulf states and US military facilities, with the imagery later appearing in Iran.<h2>Claims of surveillance before strikes</h2>According to Zelensky, there was a "clear correlation" between Russian satellite imagery and subsequent Iranian attacks. "There is a clear correlation between Russia's satellite imagery of these sites and Iranian strikes - both before the attacks, in preparation for them, and afterward (s), to assess the damage inflicted," he said.The Ukrainian leader further claimed that on July 19 and 20, Russian satellites focused on four regional air bases — two in Bahrain, one in Jordan and one in Kuwait — before the alleged intelligence was passed on to Tehran.

US President Donald Trump says any Russian assistance has been "very unimpactful" as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accuses Moscow of providing satellite intelligence to Tehran. All you need to know.

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Jul 27) dismissed suggestions that Russia has played a significant role in supporting Iran during its conflict with the United States, saying any assistance Moscow may have provided has been "very unimpactful." Trump's remarks came after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of supplying satellite intelligence to Iran to help it target US military bases and Gulf state infrastructure. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he would seek clarification directly from Russian President Vladimir Putin. "We'll find out if that's true. I'll ask Putin about it. We'll find out," Trump said. Also read | Zelensky sacks Ukraine army chief Oleksandr Syrskyi, offers new role to sacked defence minister in major military shake-up 'We've knocked the hell out of Iran' The US president argued that any Russian support had failed to alter the course of the conflict, asserting that American military operations had severely weakened Iran. "It hasn't had much impact because we've knocked the hell out of it (Iran)," Trump said. "They may be providing support, but if they are, it hasn't worked out because they (Iran) have no army, they have no air force, they have no navy, they have nothing," he added. Trump also cited Venezuela as an example to argue that Russian military equipment had not proven particularly effective. "They (Russia) gave Venezuela a lot of equipment. Venezuela had all Russian equipment. How did that work? Not too good," he said. While expressing scepticism over Zelensky's claims, Trump added that even if Moscow had provided assistance, it had made little difference. "I don't think they've been doing it, certainly not at a high level. And if they have, it has been very unimpactful," he said. Zelensky alleges Russian satellite support Trump's comments came after Zelensky made one of his strongest accusations yet against Moscow, claiming Ukrainian intelligence had tracked Russian satellite surveillance of US military installations and Gulf state infrastructure before Iranian strikes. Also read | India avoids higher US tariff, secures lower 10% rate. Here's how In a post on X, the Ukrainian president said he would share the intelligence with Kyiv's international partners. "I will instruct our intelligence to share with our partners the information we have regarding Russia's new assistance to the Iranian regime," Zelensky wrote. He alleged that since the beginning of July, Ukrainian intelligence had observed active Russian satellite monitoring of Gulf states and US military facilities, with the imagery later appearing in Iran. Claims of surveillance before strikes According to Zelensky, there was a "clear correlation" between Russian satellite imagery and subsequent Iranian attacks. "There is a clear correlation between Russia's satellite imagery of these sites and Iranian strikes - both before the attacks, in preparation for them, and afterward (s), to assess the damage inflicted," he said. The Ukrainian leader further claimed that on July 19 and 20, Russian satellites focused on four regional air bases — two in Bahrain, one in Jordan and one in Kuwait — before the alleged intelligence was passed on to Tehran.

US President Donald Trump says any Russian assistance has been "very unimpactful" as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accuses Moscow of providing satellite intelligence to Tehran. All you need to know.

'Very unimpactful': Trump downplays Russian support for Iran, promises to 'ask Putin' about Zelensky's claims

United States President Donald Trump on ‌Monday (July 27) said that he was in "very ​deep talks ​with Iran" but also prepared to restart &nbsp;"strong military action" against Tehran if diplomacy failed. Trump said that the planned US military strikes were delayed to allow diplomacy another opportunity.&nbsp;"We are in very deep talks with Iran. If they don't work out, we will go back to very strong military action," Trump said in an interview to Axios.&nbsp;Asked how long Washington is willing to give diplomacy, Trump said "Not much time. Either it goes fast or not at all."&nbsp;Trump said that he allowed temporary halt in strikes against Iran because mediating countries as well as other countries in the region asked him to give negotiations another chance, reported Axios.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/won-t-go-unanswered-will-the-ukrainian-attacks-on-caspian-sea-vessels-lead-to-the-convergence-of-the-iran-war-and-the-russia-ukraine-war-1785150065123">'Won't go unanswered': Will the Ukrainian attacks on Caspian Sea vessels lead to the convergence of the Iran war and the Russia-Ukraine war?</a>&nbsp;Trump further said that he agreed to the demands of the negotiators as there was "Nothing gained, nothing lost". He pointed towards drop in oil prices and stock market recovering after halting the attacks.&nbsp;Almost after two weeks Trump put a pause on military strikes against Iranian targets around the southern coast of Iran and in the Strait of Hormuz area.&nbsp;The decision came after consultation with top advisers and military officials who presented him with a new strike plan for the day, reported Axios.&nbsp;<h2>What is the negotiation focused on?</h2>&nbsp;Trump's remarks comes ahead of his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday. The two countries launched a joint strike on Iran in February, eliminating Iran's supreme leader Ayahtollah Ali Khemenei and several top leadership of the country. They launched the attack citing threats and Tehran's nuclear program.&nbsp;Iran and Oman are the main negotiators of peace talks between US and Iran, but Qatar, Pakistan, Egypt and Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, are actively involved.The current negotiations focuses on a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and relaunch talks on a comprehensive nuclear deal.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump said that he allowed temporary halt in strikes against Iran because mediating countries in the region asked him to give negotiations another chance.

United States President Donald Trump on ‌Monday (July 27) said that he was in "very deep talks with Iran" but also prepared to restart "strong military action" against Tehran if diplomacy failed. Trump said that the planned US military strikes were delayed to allow diplomacy another opportunity. "We are in very deep talks with Iran. If they don't work out, we will go back to very strong military action," Trump said in an interview to Axios. Asked how long Washington is willing to give diplomacy, Trump said "Not much time. Either it goes fast or not at all." Trump said that he allowed temporary halt in strikes against Iran because mediating countries as well as other countries in the region asked him to give negotiations another chance, reported Axios. ALSO READ: 'Won't go unanswered': Will the Ukrainian attacks on Caspian Sea vessels lead to the convergence of the Iran war and the Russia-Ukraine war? Trump further said that he agreed to the demands of the negotiators as there was "Nothing gained, nothing lost". He pointed towards drop in oil prices and stock market recovering after halting the attacks. Almost after two weeks Trump put a pause on military strikes against Iranian targets around the southern coast of Iran and in the Strait of Hormuz area. The decision came after consultation with top advisers and military officials who presented him with a new strike plan for the day, reported Axios. What is the negotiation focused on? Trump's remarks comes ahead of his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday. The two countries launched a joint strike on Iran in February, eliminating Iran's supreme leader Ayahtollah Ali Khemenei and several top leadership of the country. They launched the attack citing threats and Tehran's nuclear program. Iran and Oman are the main negotiators of peace talks between US and Iran, but Qatar, Pakistan, Egypt and Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, are actively involved. The current negotiations focuses on a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and relaunch talks on a comprehensive nuclear deal.

Trump said that he allowed temporary halt in strikes against Iran because mediating countries in the region asked him to give negotiations another chance.

Ready for 'strong military action' against Iran if talks fail, warns Trump

The United States has said President Donald Trump is pausing further strikes on Iran to create space for diplomacy and potential negotiations. The move comes amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran, with global leaders watching for signs of de-escalation and a possible diplomatic breakthrough.

US-Iran War: US says Trump pausing strikes to give space to diplomacy

US people are neither considering the prediction of President Donald Trump about the Iran war that is about to end, nor do they believe that Iran has lost the will or the means to keep fighting. UN Ambassador Mike Waltz speculated that he would not commit to the war ending before the end of 2026. "I'm not going to put some kind of timeline on it,” said Waltz. Waltz's statement followed after Trump denied the idea of further negotiations with Iran, allowing the war to resume at full strength after a 60-day extension of the ceasefire between both the nations dissolved earlier this month. In addition, a tanker struck a mine in the Strait of Hormuz and exploded this weekend because the biggest trade route has become increasingly unsafe for global shipping traffic.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/video-grain-vessel-struck-by-russian-cruise-missiles-sinks-7-days-after-the-attack-that-killed-10-1785125364075">Video: Grain vessel struck by Russian cruise missiles sinks 7 days after the attack that killed 10</a><h3>War Powers resolutions</h3>These developments point to mounting uncertainty inside the administration itself, with very few officials willing to accept the fact that the war is conclusively over, even as criticism mounts from Congress. While senators have so far blocked War Powers resolutions aiming to curb the president’s power, the Senate GOP caucus is growing opposed to the war and several senators have publicly stated about their beliefs that the war was misguided from the beginning. Separately, a new poll released Sunday showed that public trust in the Trump administration's assessments of Iran has eroded significantly. According to CBS News polling, only a small fraction of Americans still believe the White House's claim that the war will conclude within days or weeks. The majority instead expect the conflict to drag on for months, or possibly years, as it nears its five-month mark with senior officials seemingly unable to advance negotiations that have effectively stalled following renewed fighting. Meanwhile, this week, the president attended a dignified transfer ceremony for four American service members killed in an Iranian strike earlier this month, later asserting without evidence that the fallen troops had "said very strongly" that Iran must be prevented from acquiring nuclear weapons.

The majority instead expect the conflict to drag on for months, or possibly years, as it nears its five-month mark with senior officials seemingly unable to advance negotiations that have effectively stalled following renewed fighting.

US people are neither considering the prediction of President Donald Trump about the Iran war that is about to end, nor do they believe that Iran has lost the will or the means to keep fighting. UN Ambassador Mike Waltz speculated that he would not commit to the war ending before the end of 2026. "I'm not going to put some kind of timeline on it,” said Waltz. Waltz's statement followed after Trump denied the idea of further negotiations with Iran, allowing the war to resume at full strength after a 60-day extension of the ceasefire between both the nations dissolved earlier this month. In addition, a tanker struck a mine in the Strait of Hormuz and exploded this weekend because the biggest trade route has become increasingly unsafe for global shipping traffic. Also read: Video: Grain vessel struck by Russian cruise missiles sinks 7 days after the attack that killed 10 War Powers resolutions These developments point to mounting uncertainty inside the administration itself, with very few officials willing to accept the fact that the war is conclusively over, even as criticism mounts from Congress. While senators have so far blocked War Powers resolutions aiming to curb the president’s power, the Senate GOP caucus is growing opposed to the war and several senators have publicly stated about their beliefs that the war was misguided from the beginning. Separately, a new poll released Sunday showed that public trust in the Trump administration's assessments of Iran has eroded significantly. According to CBS News polling, only a small fraction of Americans still believe the White House's claim that the war will conclude within days or weeks. The majority instead expect the conflict to drag on for months, or possibly years, as it nears its five-month mark with senior officials seemingly unable to advance negotiations that have effectively stalled following renewed fighting. Meanwhile, this week, the president attended a dignified transfer ceremony for four American service members killed in an Iranian strike earlier this month, later asserting without evidence that the fallen troops had "said very strongly" that Iran must be prevented from acquiring nuclear weapons.

The majority instead expect the conflict to drag on for months, or possibly years, as it nears its five-month mark with senior officials seemingly unable to advance negotiations that have effectively stalled following renewed fighting.

Will Iran war last months or even years? Here's what new poll shows about what most Americans think

Responding to a proposal put forward by Pakistan to Iran and US on resuming talks between the countries, Tehran said it has not withdrawn from negotiations but has suspended them, reported Al Arabiya and Al Hadath on Sunday.&nbsp;Iran also told Pakistani officials that it has rejected the creation of a new corridor in the Strait of Hormuz, the source said.&nbsp;This comes after US stopped attacks on Iran after nearly two weeks of sustained military operations. Since the last two days there has been no US military strikes on Iran.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/houthis-strike-saudi-oil-facilities-shoot-down-drone-in-escalating-tensions-video-1785062656272">Houthis strike Saudi oil facilities, shoot down drone in escalating tensions: VIDEO</a>&nbsp;For 13 days, U.S. President Donald Trump approved military strike plans presented by officials each afternoon, with the attacks typically being carried out within hours, reported Axios.&nbsp;After US stopped attacks on Iran, Trump speaking to reporters in the White House said he retains the option of continuing or escalating the attacks, but a more feasible option would be to reach an agreement with Iran.&nbsp;“We're talking to [the Iranians] right now. I think they're getting more and more serious as the days go by. We're locked and loaded and ready to go, but we're talking to them,” Trump said.&nbsp;Early today an oil tanker exploded in the Strait of Hormuz after colliding with a naval mine outside a navigation route designated by Iran said Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency reports. No immediate official statement has been released by the Iranian authorities about the incident so far.

This comes after US stopped attacks on Iran after nearly two weeks of sustained military operations. Since the last two days there has been no US military strikes on Iran.

Responding to a proposal put forward by Pakistan to Iran and US on resuming talks between the countries, Tehran said it has not withdrawn from negotiations but has suspended them, reported Al Arabiya and Al Hadath on Sunday. Iran also told Pakistani officials that it has rejected the creation of a new corridor in the Strait of Hormuz, the source said. This comes after US stopped attacks on Iran after nearly two weeks of sustained military operations. Since the last two days there has been no US military strikes on Iran. ALSO READ: Houthis strike Saudi oil facilities, shoot down drone in escalating tensions: VIDEO For 13 days, U.S. President Donald Trump approved military strike plans presented by officials each afternoon, with the attacks typically being carried out within hours, reported Axios. After US stopped attacks on Iran, Trump speaking to reporters in the White House said he retains the option of continuing or escalating the attacks, but a more feasible option would be to reach an agreement with Iran. “We're talking to [the Iranians] right now. I think they're getting more and more serious as the days go by. We're locked and loaded and ready to go, but we're talking to them,” Trump said. Early today an oil tanker exploded in the Strait of Hormuz after colliding with a naval mine outside a navigation route designated by Iran said Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency reports. No immediate official statement has been released by the Iranian authorities about the incident so far.

This comes after US stopped attacks on Iran after nearly two weeks of sustained military operations. Since the last two days there has been no US military strikes on Iran.

Iran tells Pakistan it has not withdrawn from negotiations but suspended them: Report

The Middle East conflict is entering a dangerous new phase as Yemen's Houthi rebels intensify attacks on Saudi-linked shipping in the Red Sea. After announcing a naval blockade targeting Saudi Arabia, the Houthis claim they have struck Saudi oil tankers, raising fears of a wider regional war and renewed disruption to global energy supplies.
The escalation comes as shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains heavily disrupted, placing immense pressure on another vital maritime chokepoint—the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Saudi Arabia, which has relied on Red Sea ports to bypass Hormuz, now faces fresh threats to its oil exports.


Houthis Target Saudi Oil Tankers | Red Sea Blockade Escalates | US Faces New Middle East Crisis

India's energy priorities are undergoing a fundamental shift amid the ongoing West Asia war, which has triggered a global energy crisis, hitting the economy after key maritime routes such as the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb have been disrupted. This route marks the world's busiest oil shipping channels, providing passage for about 20 per cent of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG). However, the Indian government has opted for second and eco-friendly options to meet energy needs for different sectors in order to reduce dependency. For several years, India's focus has always remained on securing adequate fuel supplies, including coal, oil and natural gas, to power its growing economy. Today, that development has moved decisively toward the grid and other renewable sources of energy to generate electricity, which scales up faster than the infrastructure needed to carry it. In the recent past, India's rapid renewable energy expansion has begun to outpace its transmission and evacuation infrastructure, with the government estimating a need for more than 61,000 circuit kilometres of additional inter-state transmission capacity by 2029-30. Industry analysts note that around 50 GW of renewable energy capacity remains stranded across India due to transmission bottlenecks, leading to cost overruns and delayed returns. Against this backdrop, energy sector leaders are increasingly emphasising that generation and grid infrastructure must be planned together rather than in isolation.&nbsp;Narayan Kumar, CEO, Kshema Power India, said, "For decades, India's energy security was defined by one question: Do we have enough fuel to power the nation's growth? Coal, oil, and natural gas dominated the conversation, with energy security focused on ensuring reliable fuel supplies and reducing dependence on imports. Today, India's energy transition has entered a new phase. As renewable energy becomes the backbone of the country's power mix, the focus is shifting from securing fuel to securing the grid. The challenge is no longer just generating clean energy but ensuring it is transmitted efficiently, integrated seamlessly, and delivered reliably to consumers." He added that India has achieved a remarkable journey in expanding wind and solar capacity. However, renewable sources of energy are fundamentally different from conventional power generation. Kumar noted that Wind and solar projects are always situated in resource-rich regions, quite distant from industrial hubs and urban demand centres. Even the most efficient renewable projects cannot work at their complete potential, without strong networks for transmission, substations, and power evacuation infrastructure.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/explained-why-crude-oil-shocks-hit-india-harder-than-other-major-economies-and-how-can-it-change-1784647644139">EXPLAINED: Why crude oil shocks hit India harder than other major economies — And how can it change?</a> "This is where grid security becomes central to India's clean energy future. A resilient grid is not merely a network of transmission lines; it is an intelligent system capable of managing variable renewable generation, maintaining grid stability, and delivering uninterrupted power. Investments in transmission corridors, modern substations, digital monitoring, and smart grid technologies are no longer supporting initiatives—they are strategic national priorities," he added. "At Kshema Power, we have witnessed this transformation firsthand. Through the execution of more than 5.2 GW of renewable energy infrastructure globally, including over 4.5 GW of wind EPC projects, 2,000 kilometres of power transmission lines, and 2,400 MVA of substation capacity, one lesson has become increasingly clear: renewable energy generation and transmission cannot be planned in isolation. They must evolve together. Every transmission line commissioned enables renewable power to reach the grid. Every substation strengthens network reliability. Every integrated EPC project helps accelerate India's clean energy transition. As project scales continue to grow, timely execution, engineering excellence, and coordinated infrastructure planning will determine how quickly renewable energy can be integrated into the national grid," Narayan Kumar added. Narayan Kumar went on to note that success in India's energy transition going forward won't simply be judged by the volume of renewable megawatts added, but by how robust, resilient, and smart the infrastructure connecting that power to end users truly is. While fuel security once formed the bedrock of India's economic development, he said grid security will now determine the country's path toward a sustainable future. He stressed that balanced investment in both renewable generation and transmission capacity is key to building a power system that's dependable, forward-looking, and equipped to meet the nation's long-term energy goals, adding that the real measure of progress isn't just generating more clean energy, but making sure it reliably and efficiently reaches its destination at scale.<h3>Fuel supplies to securing the electricity grid</h3>Highlighting a decades-long objective, Pawan Kumar Garg, Founder &amp; Joint Managing Director, Fujiyama Power Systems, stated that India's energy strategy was driven by fuel security, as providing reliable access to coal, oil and natural gas was essential to power economic growth. He noted that India's energy transition has entered a new phase. As renewable energy capacity accelerates, the focus is shifting from securing fuel supplies to securing the electricity grid itself. "India has already crossed a major milestone, with nearly half of its installed power capacity coming from non-fossil fuel sources. The target of 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030 is now within reach. But adding renewable generation alone will not guarantee energy security. The real challenge lies in integrating intermittent solar and wind power while maintaining a stable, resilient and affordable grid," he said. "The government has seen this. Take action. They have started something called Viability Gap Funding to help with the cost of storing energy in batteries. This makes it easier for people to start projects that use power and store energy because it used to be very expensive. Now, when the government asks people to build power projects, they also want them to include a way to store energy in batteries. This means that people are planning how to make energy and store it at the time," he added. Pawan Kumar Garg, meanwhile, pointed to the growing adoption of rooftop solar panels as a shift already reshaping how power is accessed. He explained that generating electricity at home cuts down on the energy typically lost during long-distance transmission and eases pressure on the grid during peak demand periods. According to Garg, households with solar panels are gaining greater control over their own energy needs rather than relying entirely on external supply, a trend turning more homes into power producers in their own right. He emphasised that grid security isn't about a single investment area but requires a systems-level approach, encompassing storage, transmission, digital forecasting, and decentralised generation working in tandem. "India is changing the way it uses energy. We are not just replacing fuels with clean energy. We are building a new power system. This system needs to be able to support a big economy, one that is worth $10 trillion. At the same time, it needs to make sure that industries, businesses and households always have electricity. Grid security is the key to India being independent when it comes to energy. Grid security is what will really make this happen. Grid security is the foundation of India's energy independence," he further said.

India's rapid renewable energy expansion has begun to outpace its transmission and evacuation infrastructure, with the government estimating a need for more than 61,000 circuit kilometres of additional inter-state transmission capacity by 2029-30.

India's energy priorities are undergoing a fundamental shift amid the ongoing West Asia war, which has triggered a global energy crisis, hitting the economy after key maritime routes such as the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb have been disrupted. This route marks the world's busiest oil shipping channels, providing passage for about 20 per cent of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG). However, the Indian government has opted for second and eco-friendly options to meet energy needs for different sectors in order to reduce dependency. For several years, India's focus has always remained on securing adequate fuel supplies, including coal, oil and natural gas, to power its growing economy. Today, that development has moved decisively toward the grid and other renewable sources of energy to generate electricity, which scales up faster than the infrastructure needed to carry it. In the recent past, India's rapid renewable energy expansion has begun to outpace its transmission and evacuation infrastructure, with the government estimating a need for more than 61,000 circuit kilometres of additional inter-state transmission capacity by 2029-30. Industry analysts note that around 50 GW of renewable energy capacity remains stranded across India due to transmission bottlenecks, leading to cost overruns and delayed returns. Against this backdrop, energy sector leaders are increasingly emphasising that generation and grid infrastructure must be planned together rather than in isolation. Narayan Kumar, CEO, Kshema Power India, said, "For decades, India's energy security was defined by one question: Do we have enough fuel to power the nation's growth? Coal, oil, and natural gas dominated the conversation, with energy security focused on ensuring reliable fuel supplies and reducing dependence on imports. Today, India's energy transition has entered a new phase. As renewable energy becomes the backbone of the country's power mix, the focus is shifting from securing fuel to securing the grid. The challenge is no longer just generating clean energy but ensuring it is transmitted efficiently, integrated seamlessly, and delivered reliably to consumers." He added that India has achieved a remarkable journey in expanding wind and solar capacity. However, renewable sources of energy are fundamentally different from conventional power generation. Kumar noted that Wind and solar projects are always situated in resource-rich regions, quite distant from industrial hubs and urban demand centres. Even the most efficient renewable projects cannot work at their complete potential, without strong networks for transmission, substations, and power evacuation infrastructure. Also read: EXPLAINED: Why crude oil shocks hit India harder than other major economies — And how can it change? "This is where grid security becomes central to India's clean energy future. A resilient grid is not merely a network of transmission lines; it is an intelligent system capable of managing variable renewable generation, maintaining grid stability, and delivering uninterrupted power. Investments in transmission corridors, modern substations, digital monitoring, and smart grid technologies are no longer supporting initiatives—they are strategic national priorities," he added. "At Kshema Power, we have witnessed this transformation firsthand. Through the execution of more than 5.2 GW of renewable energy infrastructure globally, including over 4.5 GW of wind EPC projects, 2,000 kilometres of power transmission lines, and 2,400 MVA of substation capacity, one lesson has become increasingly clear: renewable energy generation and transmission cannot be planned in isolation. They must evolve together. Every transmission line commissioned enables renewable power to reach the grid. Every substation strengthens network reliability. Every integrated EPC project helps accelerate India's clean energy transition. As project scales continue to grow, timely execution, engineering excellence, and coordinated infrastructure planning will determine how quickly renewable energy can be integrated into the national grid," Narayan Kumar added. Narayan Kumar went on to note that success in India's energy transition going forward won't simply be judged by the volume of renewable megawatts added, but by how robust, resilient, and smart the infrastructure connecting that power to end users truly is. While fuel security once formed the bedrock of India's economic development, he said grid security will now determine the country's path toward a sustainable future. He stressed that balanced investment in both renewable generation and transmission capacity is key to building a power system that's dependable, forward-looking, and equipped to meet the nation's long-term energy goals, adding that the real measure of progress isn't just generating more clean energy, but making sure it reliably and efficiently reaches its destination at scale. Fuel supplies to securing the electricity grid Highlighting a decades-long objective, Pawan Kumar Garg, Founder & Joint Managing Director, Fujiyama Power Systems, stated that India's energy strategy was driven by fuel security, as providing reliable access to coal, oil and natural gas was essential to power economic growth. He noted that India's energy transition has entered a new phase. As renewable energy capacity accelerates, the focus is shifting from securing fuel supplies to securing the electricity grid itself. "India has already crossed a major milestone, with nearly half of its installed power capacity coming from non-fossil fuel sources. The target of 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030 is now within reach. But adding renewable generation alone will not guarantee energy security. The real challenge lies in integrating intermittent solar and wind power while maintaining a stable, resilient and affordable grid," he said. "The government has seen this. Take action. They have started something called Viability Gap Funding to help with the cost of storing energy in batteries. This makes it easier for people to start projects that use power and store energy because it used to be very expensive. Now, when the government asks people to build power projects, they also want them to include a way to store energy in batteries. This means that people are planning how to make energy and store it at the time," he added. Pawan Kumar Garg, meanwhile, pointed to the growing adoption of rooftop solar panels as a shift already reshaping how power is accessed. He explained that generating electricity at home cuts down on the energy typically lost during long-distance transmission and eases pressure on the grid during peak demand periods. According to Garg, households with solar panels are gaining greater control over their own energy needs rather than relying entirely on external supply, a trend turning more homes into power producers in their own right. He emphasised that grid security isn't about a single investment area but requires a systems-level approach, encompassing storage, transmission, digital forecasting, and decentralised generation working in tandem. "India is changing the way it uses energy. We are not just replacing fuels with clean energy. We are building a new power system. This system needs to be able to support a big economy, one that is worth $10 trillion. At the same time, it needs to make sure that industries, businesses and households always have electricity. Grid security is the key to India being independent when it comes to energy. Grid security is what will really make this happen. Grid security is the foundation of India's energy independence," he further said.

India's rapid renewable energy expansion has begun to outpace its transmission and evacuation infrastructure, with the government estimating a need for more than 61,000 circuit kilometres of additional inter-state transmission capacity by 2029-30.

From fuel security to grid security: The next chapter of India's energy transition

US President Donald Trump delivers a major foreign policy update, asserting that Tehran is approaching diplomatic negotiations with newfound seriousness amid escalating tensions. As intense back-channel diplomacy unfolds alongside ongoing military posturing in the Persian Gulf, global leaders are closely watching whether these high-stakes talks can de-escalate the standoff or if the threat of conflict remains imminent.


US-Iran war | Trump: Iran is taking negotiations more seriously than before

US President Donald Trump on Friday (July 24) warned that Iran possessing a nuclear weapon could have wiped out the Middle East, as he confirmed that Washington is engaged in talks with Tehran while keeping the option of further military action on the table. Speaking to reporters, Trump defended his administration's hardline approach towards Iran, saying the country's leadership had already destabilised the region through its actions.&nbsp;"You saw that when they (Iran leaders) shockingly started shooting at everybody all over the Middle East. If they had a nuclear weapon, there wouldn't be a spot... there might not be a Middle East today," Trump said. His remarks came as tensions remain high between Washington and Tehran following recent military confrontations and renewed diplomatic efforts.Trump said the United States had not yet decided whether to launch major new strikes against Iran, stressing that negotiations were ongoing.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-us-in-talks-with-iran-no-decision-yet-on-major-strikes-here-s-what-it-means-1784928687382">Trump says US in talks with Iran, no decision yet on major strikes. Here’s what it means</a>&nbsp;"We're talking to them right now," he said when asked whether Americans should expect significant military action. “While we're talking, we'll see what comes in.” The US president said Washington retained the option of continuing strikes against Iran "piece by piece" or intensifying the campaign "in a more rapid fashion". However, he argued that a negotiated settlement would be the preferred outcome.&nbsp;Trump said Iran appeared to be taking the talks more seriously, although he cautioned that the negotiations could still collapse. He reiterated that any agreement must ensure Tehran does not acquire a nuclear weapon. When asked who was involved in the discussions, Trump replied, "Sort of everybody," adding that Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were among the officials participating in the negotiations.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/all-damages-done-to-ships-will-be-paid-for-by-iranian-money-trump-over-strikes-in-gulf-1784851841686">‘All damages done to ships will be paid for by Iranian money’: Trump over strikes in Gulf</a>&nbsp;Trump did not disclose further details about the progress of the talks or indicate when a decision on possible military action might be taken. His comments underscored the administration's twin-track approach of pursuing diplomacy while maintaining the threat of force if negotiations fail.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Donald Trump warned Iran possessing nuclear weapons could destroy West Asia, confirming ongoing negotiations with Tehran while keeping military action on the table to prevent nuclear capability.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (July 24) warned that Iran possessing a nuclear weapon could have wiped out the Middle East, as he confirmed that Washington is engaged in talks with Tehran while keeping the option of further military action on the table. Speaking to reporters, Trump defended his administration's hardline approach towards Iran, saying the country's leadership had already destabilised the region through its actions. "You saw that when they (Iran leaders) shockingly started shooting at everybody all over the Middle East. If they had a nuclear weapon, there wouldn't be a spot... there might not be a Middle East today," Trump said. His remarks came as tensions remain high between Washington and Tehran following recent military confrontations and renewed diplomatic efforts. Trump said the United States had not yet decided whether to launch major new strikes against Iran, stressing that negotiations were ongoing. Also read: Trump says US in talks with Iran, no decision yet on major strikes. Here’s what it means "We're talking to them right now," he said when asked whether Americans should expect significant military action. “While we're talking, we'll see what comes in.” The US president said Washington retained the option of continuing strikes against Iran "piece by piece" or intensifying the campaign "in a more rapid fashion". However, he argued that a negotiated settlement would be the preferred outcome. Trump said Iran appeared to be taking the talks more seriously, although he cautioned that the negotiations could still collapse. He reiterated that any agreement must ensure Tehran does not acquire a nuclear weapon. When asked who was involved in the discussions, Trump replied, "Sort of everybody," adding that Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were among the officials participating in the negotiations. Also read: ‘All damages done to ships will be paid for by Iranian money’: Trump over strikes in Gulf Trump did not disclose further details about the progress of the talks or indicate when a decision on possible military action might be taken. His comments underscored the administration's twin-track approach of pursuing diplomacy while maintaining the threat of force if negotiations fail.

Donald Trump warned Iran possessing nuclear weapons could destroy West Asia, confirming ongoing negotiations with Tehran while keeping military action on the table to prevent nuclear capability.

‘If they had nuclear weapon, there might not be a Middle East today’: Trump’s fresh jibe at Iran

The United States has issued new sanctions against Babak Zanjani, an infamous Iranian billionaire who is now allegedly helping Iran avoid previous sanctions and fund the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.&nbsp;“Today’s action targets four individuals and nine entities tied to Zanjani’s operations,” said Tommy Pigott, a spokesperson for the US State Department, in a press release.&nbsp;&nbsp;“Zanjani’s re-emergence as a regime-linked financier — despite previously receiving a death sentence in Iran for embezzlement — demonstrates the lengths to which Iranian state-affiliated elites will go to preserve access to the international financial system so that they can enrich themselves, even as they mismanage the Iranian economy,” Pigott added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-flew-irgc-men-advisers-and-military-gear-to-yemen-to-bolster-houthis-for-red-sea-blockade-sources-1784820749435">Iran flew IRGC men, advisers and military gear to Yemen, bolstered Houthis for Red Sea blockade: Sources</a>&nbsp;According to the US Treasury Department, Zanjani was sentenced to death for allegedly embezzling millions from the National Iranian Oil Company, but his sentence was commuted in 2024, and then last year, he emerged as a major backer of the regime.&nbsp;“The Iranian regime continues to pay a steep economic price for its reckless behaviour, with the Rial plunging to another record low and inflation up massively,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement.&nbsp;&nbsp;Under President Trump’s leadership, the US Treasury will continue cutting off economic access for corrupt Iranian regime elites, along with their financiers and facilitators, he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-he-s-mulling-a-massive-bigger-than-ever-before-attack-on-iran-1784828958067">Trump says he’s mulling ‘a massive, bigger than ever before’ attack on Iran</a>&nbsp;The sanctions target Zanjani’s Dot One conglomerate, which the US asserts is involved in everything from telecommunications and transportation to airlines and digital assets, like cryptocurrency.&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>EU sanctions Iranian judges, hacker heading cyber group</h2>&nbsp;The European Union on Friday announced sanctions on five Iranian judges, as well as a leading cyber group figure, for human rights offenses.The European Union’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said that though the world’s focus is on the Middle East conflict, Iran’s repression against its own people cannot be overlooked.&nbsp;“While the world’s attention is on the war in the Middle East, we can’t lose sight of Iran’s repression against its own people,” Kallas said in a post on X.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/terror-attack-on-khyber-pakhtunkhwa-checkpost-kills-15-including-12-pakistani-soldiers-1784902212890">Terror attack on Khyber Pakhtunkhwa checkpost kills 15, including 12 Pakistani soldiers</a>&nbsp;The European Council said in a statement that it was including five judges of Iran’s regional Revolutionary courts who have presided over trials targeting religious minorities and political dissidents on the basis of vaguely defined national security and religious charges.&nbsp;&nbsp;“They have imposed death sentences and long prison sentences, flogging, fines or supplementary punishments on political dissidents and human rights activists,” the statement added.&nbsp;The council further said that it was also targeting an Iranian hacker and computer engineer named Nima Salehi, who is the founder and a leading figure within the ‘Ashiyane’ cyber group, which cooperates closely with the EU-listed Cyber Police (FATA) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and is responsible for intensive cyber-attacks on both domestic opponents and reformists and foreign institutions, thereby assisting the regime’s crackdown against the opposition.

According to the US Treasury Department, Iranian billionaire Babak Zanjani was sentenced to death for allegedly embezzling millions from the National Iranian Oil Company, but his sentence was commuted in 2024, and then last year, he emerged as a major backer of the regime.

The United States has issued new sanctions against Babak Zanjani, an infamous Iranian billionaire who is now allegedly helping Iran avoid previous sanctions and fund the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. “Today’s action targets four individuals and nine entities tied to Zanjani’s operations,” said Tommy Pigott, a spokesperson for the US State Department, in a press release. “Zanjani’s re-emergence as a regime-linked financier — despite previously receiving a death sentence in Iran for embezzlement — demonstrates the lengths to which Iranian state-affiliated elites will go to preserve access to the international financial system so that they can enrich themselves, even as they mismanage the Iranian economy,” Pigott added. Also Read: Iran flew IRGC men, advisers and military gear to Yemen, bolstered Houthis for Red Sea blockade: Sources According to the US Treasury Department, Zanjani was sentenced to death for allegedly embezzling millions from the National Iranian Oil Company, but his sentence was commuted in 2024, and then last year, he emerged as a major backer of the regime. “The Iranian regime continues to pay a steep economic price for its reckless behaviour, with the Rial plunging to another record low and inflation up massively,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. Under President Trump’s leadership, the US Treasury will continue cutting off economic access for corrupt Iranian regime elites, along with their financiers and facilitators, he added. Also Read: Trump says he’s mulling ‘a massive, bigger than ever before’ attack on Iran The sanctions target Zanjani’s Dot One conglomerate, which the US asserts is involved in everything from telecommunications and transportation to airlines and digital assets, like cryptocurrency. EU sanctions Iranian judges, hacker heading cyber group The European Union on Friday announced sanctions on five Iranian judges, as well as a leading cyber group figure, for human rights offenses. The European Union’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said that though the world’s focus is on the Middle East conflict, Iran’s repression against its own people cannot be overlooked. “While the world’s attention is on the war in the Middle East, we can’t lose sight of Iran’s repression against its own people,” Kallas said in a post on X. Also Read: Terror attack on Khyber Pakhtunkhwa checkpost kills 15, including 12 Pakistani soldiers The European Council said in a statement that it was including five judges of Iran’s regional Revolutionary courts who have presided over trials targeting religious minorities and political dissidents on the basis of vaguely defined national security and religious charges. “They have imposed death sentences and long prison sentences, flogging, fines or supplementary punishments on political dissidents and human rights activists,” the statement added. The council further said that it was also targeting an Iranian hacker and computer engineer named Nima Salehi, who is the founder and a leading figure within the ‘Ashiyane’ cyber group, which cooperates closely with the EU-listed Cyber Police (FATA) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and is responsible for intensive cyber-attacks on both domestic opponents and reformists and foreign institutions, thereby assisting the regime’s crackdown against the opposition.

According to the US Treasury Department, Iranian billionaire Babak Zanjani was sentenced to death for allegedly embezzling millions from the National Iranian Oil Company, but his sentence was commuted in 2024, and then last year, he emerged as a major backer of the regime.

US imposes new sanctions against Iranian billionaire Babak Zanjani for enabling regime

US President Donald Trump warned China and Russia on Friday against selling weapons to Iran. In his social media post, Trump said that during his visit to China the Chinese President Xi Jinping had assured him that Beijing would not be selling Weapons to the Islamic Republic of Iran under any circumstances and that he takes his word on the commitment.&nbsp;"President Xi, at our recent meeting in Beijing, China, told me that he would not, under any circumstances, give or sell Weapons to the Islamic Republic of Iran — And that statement included Chinese Companies. Considering our relationship, I take him at his word and, besides, l am doing him very big favors, also," said Trump on Truth Social.&nbsp;He also said that a similar promise was made by the Russian President Vladimir Putin, who "understands that I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries."&nbsp;"Likewise, President Putin, despite the horrible War going on in Ukraine (The relationship remains, as it does with President Zelenskyy), told me that he would not sell Weapons to Iran. He understands that I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries. They pay full price, and how those Weapons are distributed, I have no idea. Therefore, two major Countries that people speak of often in terms of Iran are, in my opinion, not participating," he said.&nbsp;Trump ended his post by threatening message that read, “If they did, it would be very bad for them — Certainly not in their best interests. Thank you for your attention to this matter!.”

He also said that a similar promise was made by the Russian President Vladimir Putin, who "understands that I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries."

US President Donald Trump warned China and Russia on Friday against selling weapons to Iran. In his social media post, Trump said that during his visit to China the Chinese President Xi Jinping had assured him that Beijing would not be selling Weapons to the Islamic Republic of Iran under any circumstances and that he takes his word on the commitment. "President Xi, at our recent meeting in Beijing, China, told me that he would not, under any circumstances, give or sell Weapons to the Islamic Republic of Iran — And that statement included Chinese Companies. Considering our relationship, I take him at his word and, besides, l am doing him very big favors, also," said Trump on Truth Social. He also said that a similar promise was made by the Russian President Vladimir Putin, who "understands that I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries." "Likewise, President Putin, despite the horrible War going on in Ukraine (The relationship remains, as it does with President Zelenskyy), told me that he would not sell Weapons to Iran. He understands that I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries. They pay full price, and how those Weapons are distributed, I have no idea. Therefore, two major Countries that people speak of often in terms of Iran are, in my opinion, not participating," he said. Trump ended his post by threatening message that read, “If they did, it would be very bad for them — Certainly not in their best interests. Thank you for your attention to this matter!.”

He also said that a similar promise was made by the Russian President Vladimir Putin, who "understands that I do not sell Weapons to Ukraine, but to NATO Countries."

'It would be very bad for them': Trump warns China, Russia against selling weapons to Iran

US President Donald Trump has revealed that he is close to deciding on a massive new attack against Iran, signaling a major escalation in the ongoing conflict. The United States has now carried out strikes on Iranian military targets for the 13th consecutive night, while Iran continues retaliatory attacks across the Gulf region.

As tensions rise, oil prices have crossed $100 per barrel, raising fears of a global energy shock. Trump also warned that the US would use frozen Iranian assets to compensate for damage caused to ships and cargo in the Gulf, while directly blaming Iran for Houthi attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea.

Trump preparing massive Iran strike? | Gulf war escalates, oil prices hit new highs | US- Iran War 

Washington DC: US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Jul 23) reiterated that Iran would never be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, saying the United States was doing "extremely well" as tensions with Tehran continued to escalate.Speaking at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters in Washington, DC, while unveiling his Ratepayer Protection Pledge, Trump said Iran was not yet ready for any meaningful engagement and accused it of harbouring "evil intentions."<h2>Trump blames predecessors for Iran's might</h2>"We're doing very well against the Islamic Republic of Iran—we're doing extremely well. They would like to do something, but I say they're not ready yet. They need more of the same. They've got some evil intentions. We cannot let them have a nuclear weapon," Trump said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-house-approves-95-billion-budget-for-trump-s-war-against-iran-here-s-what-it-means-1784763680195">US House approves $95 billion budget for Trump's war against Iran. Where will the money go?</a>He further asserted that Iran should not even be allowed to contemplate acquiring nuclear weapons. "We cannot let them even think about having nuclear weapons, and that is exactly what is happening. They will never have a nuclear weapon. This should've been done by other American Presidents or other countries. It didn't have to be us, but if we don't do it nobody else will. I will, and nobody else has the capability to do it," he said.<h2>Trump takes credit for US military</h2>The US president also praised the strength of the American military, saying it had been built during his first term and was now being deployed more extensively than he had anticipated. "We are using it (the military) a little more than we thought," Trump said, while also referring to Venezuela and oil production, adding that the United States had "paid for that war many times over."<h2>CENTCOM claims naval blockade success</h2>Meanwhile, the US Central Command (CENTCOM) said it had intensified maritime operations against Iran. According to CENTCOM, since resuming its naval blockade against Iran nine days ago, US forces have redirected 12 commercial vessels and disabled one vessel to prevent ships from entering or leaving Iranian ports and coastal areas.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Since resuming the naval blockade against Iran nine days ago, CENTCOM has redirected 12 commercial vessels and disabled 1 to prevent ships from entering or leaving Iranian ports or coastal areas. <a href="https://t.co/zV8zAK0H2X">pic.twitter.com/zV8zAK0H2X</a>&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2080359848793846029?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Iran claims retaliatory strikes</h2>The remarks came after Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Iranian Army claimed to have carried out retaliatory strikes on US military infrastructure in Kuwait and Jordan.According to the Iranian claim, the attacks targeted key air defence systems, logistics depots and drone facilities. The claims could not be independently verified.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-targets-india-s-gateway-to-central-asia-centcom-confirms-surveillance-tower-at-iran-s-chabahar-port-destroyed-1784336537527">US destroying India's gateway to Central Asia? CENTCOM confirms surveillance tower at Iran's Chabahar Port annihilated</a><h2>Rubio warns Iran of further consequences</h2>Also on Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that Tehran would continue to face severe consequences for its actions.Rubio said Iran would continue to "pay a very heavy price" and described President Trump's approach as "a head for an eye." He accused Tehran of repeatedly failing to honour agreements and indicated that Washington would maintain pressure until Iran was prepared to negotiate a deal.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

US President Donald Trump said Iran would "never" be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, accusing Tehran of harbouring "evil intentions", while Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the country would continue to "pay a very heavy price" as tensions escalated.

Washington DC: US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Jul 23) reiterated that Iran would never be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, saying the United States was doing "extremely well" as tensions with Tehran continued to escalate. Speaking at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters in Washington, DC, while unveiling his Ratepayer Protection Pledge, Trump said Iran was not yet ready for any meaningful engagement and accused it of harbouring "evil intentions." Trump blames predecessors for Iran's might "We're doing very well against the Islamic Republic of Iran—we're doing extremely well. They would like to do something, but I say they're not ready yet. They need more of the same. They've got some evil intentions. We cannot let them have a nuclear weapon," Trump said. Also read | US House approves $95 billion budget for Trump's war against Iran. Where will the money go? He further asserted that Iran should not even be allowed to contemplate acquiring nuclear weapons. "We cannot let them even think about having nuclear weapons, and that is exactly what is happening. They will never have a nuclear weapon. This should've been done by other American Presidents or other countries. It didn't have to be us, but if we don't do it nobody else will. I will, and nobody else has the capability to do it," he said. Trump takes credit for US military The US president also praised the strength of the American military, saying it had been built during his first term and was now being deployed more extensively than he had anticipated. "We are using it (the military) a little more than we thought," Trump said, while also referring to Venezuela and oil production, adding that the United States had "paid for that war many times over." CENTCOM claims naval blockade success Meanwhile, the US Central Command (CENTCOM) said it had intensified maritime operations against Iran. According to CENTCOM, since resuming its naval blockade against Iran nine days ago, US forces have redirected 12 commercial vessels and disabled one vessel to prevent ships from entering or leaving Iranian ports and coastal areas.

US President Donald Trump said Iran would "never" be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, accusing Tehran of harbouring "evil intentions", while Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the country would continue to "pay a very heavy price" as tensions escalated.

Trump warns Iran has 'evil intentions', vows it will 'never' get nuclear weapons

Iran's chief negotiator and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has ridiculed the United States' military strategy aimed at weakening Tehran's ability to control the Strait of Hormuz, claiming the approach has backfired by driving up global oil prices.In a sarcastic post on X, Ghalibaf wrote: "They wanted to punish Iran. Punished themselves with triple-digit oil instead. 10/10 strategy."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/the-delusional-us-president-has-khamenei-s-adviser-warns-of-severe-response-to-any-us-strikes-on-bridges-or-power-plants-1784837345063">'The delusional US president has...': Khamenei’s adviser warns of ‘severe’ response to any US strikes on bridges or power plants</a>&nbsp;His remarks came after Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, briefly climbed above $100 a barrel on Thursday following attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels on two Saudi oil tankers.The comments come amid the continuing fallout from the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, which has fuelled concerns over energy supplies and disrupted global markets.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pay-a-big-price-trump-issues-fresh-warning-as-he-receives-us-troops-killed-by-iran-1784760407508">'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran</a>&nbsp;Earlier this month, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lowered its global growth forecast, citing the economic impact of the conflict. The IMF described the outlook as a "modest slowdown", revising its projected global growth rate for the year from 3.1 per cent to 3 per cent.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;The Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime chokepoint through which a significant share of the world's oil passes, remains at the centre of regional tensions, with markets closely monitoring developments over fears of further disruptions to global energy supplies.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/he-s-the-architect-of-the-genocide-against-palestinians-despite-trump-s-remark-mamdani-repeats-netanyahu-will-be-arrested-if-visits-us-1784666149643">‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US</a>Jul 22, 2026

Iranian official Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf mocked US military strategy near the Strait of Hormuz, claiming it backfired by pushing global Brent crude prices past $100 amid regional energy conflict.

Iran's chief negotiator and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has ridiculed the United States' military strategy aimed at weakening Tehran's ability to control the Strait of Hormuz, claiming the approach has backfired by driving up global oil prices. In a sarcastic post on X, Ghalibaf wrote: "They wanted to punish Iran. Punished themselves with triple-digit oil instead. 10/10 strategy." Also read: 'The delusional US president has...': Khamenei’s adviser warns of ‘severe’ response to any US strikes on bridges or power plants His remarks came after Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, briefly climbed above $100 a barrel on Thursday following attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels on two Saudi oil tankers. The comments come amid the continuing fallout from the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, which has fuelled concerns over energy supplies and disrupted global markets. Also read: 'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran Earlier this month, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lowered its global growth forecast, citing the economic impact of the conflict. The IMF described the outlook as a "modest slowdown", revising its projected global growth rate for the year from 3.1 per cent to 3 per cent. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness The Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime chokepoint through which a significant share of the world's oil passes, remains at the centre of regional tensions, with markets closely monitoring developments over fears of further disruptions to global energy supplies. Also read: ‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US Jul 22, 2026

Iranian official Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf mocked US military strategy near the Strait of Hormuz, claiming it backfired by pushing global Brent crude prices past $100 amid regional energy conflict.

‘10/10 strategy’: Iran's Ghalibaf mocks US strategy after oil prices surge past $100

Iran has warned that it will respond with "severe" and escalating action if the United States carries out strikes on its infrastructure, after US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iranian bridges and power plants. Mohsen Rezaei, a senior military adviser to Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, accused Trump of making "fatal mistakes" in his handling of the conflict with Iran.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-he-s-mulling-a-massive-bigger-than-ever-before-attack-on-iran-1784828958067">Trump says he’s mulling ‘a massive, bigger than ever before’ attack on Iran</a>&nbsp;"The delusional US president has, through a series of fatal mistakes, gone from playing the 'madman' to playing the 'desperate man'," Rezaei said in remarks carried by Iranian media.He also referred to what he described as an "attack on pilgrims" in Shalamcheh, an Iranian town on the border with Iraq, and said US threats to target Iranian infrastructure reflected "desperation and helplessness."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-us-will-hold-iran-responsible-for-houthi-attacks-on-ships-in-red-sea-1784813106940">Trump says US will hold Iran responsible for Houthi attacks on ships in Red Sea</a>&nbsp;"An attack on pilgrims in Shalamcheh and threats of infrastructure strikes are nothing but signs of desperation and helplessness," Rezaei said. Warning of retaliation, he added: "Iran's response to attacks on its infrastructure will be severe and escalatory."&nbsp;The remarks came a day after Trump issued a fresh warning to Tehran over attacks on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-saudi-nuclear-deal-opens-door-to-riyadh-s-uranium-enrichment-ambitions-here-s-how-1784766129922">US-Saudi nuclear deal opens door to Riyadh's uranium enrichment ambitions. Here’s how</a>&nbsp;On Wednesday, Trump said the United States would "bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT" every time Iran targets a ship transiting the strategic waterway, signalling a tougher stance amid heightened tensions in the region.&nbsp;The latest exchange of threats underscores the growing confrontation between Washington and Tehran, with both sides adopting increasingly combative rhetoric as concerns mount over the security of one of the world's busiest oil shipping routes.

Iran warned of "severe" retaliation after US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iranian infrastructure for every ship targeted in the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran has warned that it will respond with "severe" and escalating action if the United States carries out strikes on its infrastructure, after US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iranian bridges and power plants. Mohsen Rezaei, a senior military adviser to Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, accused Trump of making "fatal mistakes" in his handling of the conflict with Iran. Also read: Trump says he’s mulling ‘a massive, bigger than ever before’ attack on Iran "The delusional US president has, through a series of fatal mistakes, gone from playing the 'madman' to playing the 'desperate man'," Rezaei said in remarks carried by Iranian media. He also referred to what he described as an "attack on pilgrims" in Shalamcheh, an Iranian town on the border with Iraq, and said US threats to target Iranian infrastructure reflected "desperation and helplessness." Also read: Trump says US will hold Iran responsible for Houthi attacks on ships in Red Sea "An attack on pilgrims in Shalamcheh and threats of infrastructure strikes are nothing but signs of desperation and helplessness," Rezaei said. Warning of retaliation, he added: "Iran's response to attacks on its infrastructure will be severe and escalatory." The remarks came a day after Trump issued a fresh warning to Tehran over attacks on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Also read: US-Saudi nuclear deal opens door to Riyadh's uranium enrichment ambitions. Here’s how On Wednesday, Trump said the United States would "bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT" every time Iran targets a ship transiting the strategic waterway, signalling a tougher stance amid heightened tensions in the region. The latest exchange of threats underscores the growing confrontation between Washington and Tehran, with both sides adopting increasingly combative rhetoric as concerns mount over the security of one of the world's busiest oil shipping routes.

Iran warned of "severe" retaliation after US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iranian infrastructure for every ship targeted in the Strait of Hormuz.

'The delusional US president has...': Khamenei’s adviser warns of ‘severe’ response to any US strikes on bridges or power plants

The United Nations on Thursday (July 23) warned that the situation in the Middle East is going out of control and pushing the region to the "edge of the unimaginable," as the United States and Iran traded powerful strikes in recent days, escalating tensions in the Gulf region and raising concerns that the conflict could spill over across the wider Gulf.&nbsp;"The situation is getting out of control. It is teetering on the edge of the unimaginable. The region is being pulled into an ever-widening circle of confrontation. One crisis feeds another. One escalation triggers the next," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a Security Council meeting.&nbsp;"As this dynamic spreads, the political objectives are becoming increasingly obscured by the confrontation itself."&nbsp;These statements came as the United States conducted its 12th consecutive night of military strikes against targets in Iran over control of the vital Strait of Hormuz. In retaliation, the Islamic Republic launched a barrage of missiles and drones across Gulf countries, including Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan and others.&nbsp;The recent flare-up, which ended the fragile ceasefire reached after the signing of the 14-point Memorandum of Understanding between Tehran and Washington in June, led to the deaths of four US service members in Jordan and Iran. On the other hand, at least 50 civilians have been killed and around 500 wounded in the Islamic Republic, the health ministry said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-flew-irgc-men-advisers-and-military-gear-to-yemen-to-bolster-houthis-for-red-sea-blockade-sources-1784820749435">Iran flew IRGC men, advisers and military gear to Yemen, bolstered Houthis for Red Sea blockade: Sources</a>&nbsp;Further complicating the situation, Yemen's Houthi rebels declared a naval blockade of Saudi Arabia and threatened to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, expanding the regional wartime conflict beyond Hormuz.&nbsp;Donald Trump, meanwhile, warned that the United States treats the Houthis as a direct proxy of Iran. He stated that if the Houthis carry out further attacks, "major military punishment will be inflicted upon Iran and, of course, the Houthis themselves."&nbsp;The escalation led to a significant surge in crude prices, threatening a wider energy crisis across the world. Brent crude crossed $100 a barrel, while WTI crude surged to $91.50 per barrel.&nbsp;UN Chief repeatedly expressed his concern and called for dialogue and diplomacy amid ongoing escalation between the United States and Iran. Secretary-General António Guterres “remains deeply concerned by the continuing and expanding military escalation between Iran and the United States over the past few days,” UN Spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric told journalists in New York on Tuesday.&nbsp;

The United Nations warned that the escalating US-Iran conflict is creating a cycle of confrontation in which each crisis fuels another and every escalation triggers the next, widening instability across the region.

The United Nations on Thursday (July 23) warned that the situation in the Middle East is going out of control and pushing the region to the "edge of the unimaginable," as the United States and Iran traded powerful strikes in recent days, escalating tensions in the Gulf region and raising concerns that the conflict could spill over across the wider Gulf. "The situation is getting out of control. It is teetering on the edge of the unimaginable. The region is being pulled into an ever-widening circle of confrontation. One crisis feeds another. One escalation triggers the next," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a Security Council meeting. "As this dynamic spreads, the political objectives are becoming increasingly obscured by the confrontation itself." These statements came as the United States conducted its 12th consecutive night of military strikes against targets in Iran over control of the vital Strait of Hormuz. In retaliation, the Islamic Republic launched a barrage of missiles and drones across Gulf countries, including Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan and others. The recent flare-up, which ended the fragile ceasefire reached after the signing of the 14-point Memorandum of Understanding between Tehran and Washington in June, led to the deaths of four US service members in Jordan and Iran. On the other hand, at least 50 civilians have been killed and around 500 wounded in the Islamic Republic, the health ministry said. Also Read: Iran flew IRGC men, advisers and military gear to Yemen, bolstered Houthis for Red Sea blockade: Sources Further complicating the situation, Yemen's Houthi rebels declared a naval blockade of Saudi Arabia and threatened to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, expanding the regional wartime conflict beyond Hormuz. Donald Trump, meanwhile, warned that the United States treats the Houthis as a direct proxy of Iran. He stated that if the Houthis carry out further attacks, "major military punishment will be inflicted upon Iran and, of course, the Houthis themselves." The escalation led to a significant surge in crude prices, threatening a wider energy crisis across the world. Brent crude crossed $100 a barrel, while WTI crude surged to $91.50 per barrel. UN Chief repeatedly expressed his concern and called for dialogue and diplomacy amid ongoing escalation between the United States and Iran. Secretary-General António Guterres “remains deeply concerned by the continuing and expanding military escalation between Iran and the United States over the past few days,” UN Spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric told journalists in New York on Tuesday.

The United Nations warned that the escalating US-Iran conflict is creating a cycle of confrontation in which each crisis fuels another and every escalation triggers the next, widening instability across the region.

Middle East on ‘edge of unimaginable’ as US-Iran conflict fuels regional tensions: UN


Global tensions continue to escalate as Iran claims attacks on multiple US military bases in Kuwait and Jordan following American strikes. The UK has temporarily withdrawn diplomatic staff from Iran, while Russia has warned the United States against continuing arms supplies to Ukraine. In India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announces fast-track courts for paper leak cases, promising strict action amid nationwide student protests. South Korean investigators raid the election commission over alleged voter turnout manipulation, while devastating wildfires continue across Italy, France, and Spain. Meanwhile, economists expect the Bank of Japan to delay any interest rate hike until December as global economic uncertainty persists.

Watch the full report for the latest international headlines, geopolitical developments, business updates, and breaking world news.

Iran Attacks US Bases | PM Modi's Fast-Track Courts | Europe Wildfires | Korea Election Raid 

The world's biggest stories in one bulletin! In today's Breaking World News, the US military launched another wave of strikes on Iranian military targets, marking the 12th consecutive night of attacks as tensions in the Middle East continue to rise. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia confirmed a tanker was hit in the Red Sea, while Yemen's Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for attacks on shipping.

In Asia, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, reaffirming Beijing's commitment to strengthening China-India ties and resolving sensitive issues through dialogue.

Back in India, security remains tight at Delhi's Jantar Mantar as the CJP-led protest continues, with 16 Delhi Metro stations closed amid fresh tensions.

This bulletin also covers:

US-Iran conflict latest updates
China-India diplomatic talks
Saudi tanker attack in the Red Sea
Ukraine peace negotiations
Deadly attacks in Nigeria
France wildfire forces mass evacuations
Google parent Alphabet beats earnings expectations with AI-driven growth
Global political, military, business, and climate updates

Stay tuned to Beyond World Is One for the latest international news, geopolitical developments, and breaking headlines from around the globe.

CJP Protest | China-India Talks |  US Strikes Iran | Ukraine Peace Talks | Nigeria Attack | Wildfire

The continued tensions in the Middle East have pushed oil prices to rise more than 1.5 per cent, the highest in more than six weeks, on Thursday (Jul 23). This comes as the United States launched fresh strikes on Iran and Yemen’s Houthis targeting oil tankers in the Red Sea. Brent crude surged about 2 per cent to touch $96 a barrel in early trading, extending gains from the previous session, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose nearly 1.7 per cent to above $88 a barrel.The US military carried out a 12th consecutive strike on Iran overnight. The attack came hours after US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb a bridge or power plant in retaliation for any Iranian attack in the Strait of Hormuz.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-iran-secretly-ship-70-million-barrels-of-oil-to-china-report-claims-6-billion-crude-exported-before-blockade-restored-1784435146287">Did Iran secretly ship 70 million barrels of oil to China? Report claims $6 billion crude exported before blockade restored</a><h2>Trump threatens to bomb Iranian infrastructure</h2>In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said, “From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran.”<h2>Iran stops oil tankers</h2>Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said that they stopped three oil tankers from passing through the Strait of Hormuz. It did not say where the incident happened.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-targets-us-bases-in-bahrain-kuwait-and-jordan-as-conflict-in-middle-east-escalates-1784372546894">Iran targets US bases in Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan as conflict in Middle East escalates</a>“Three oil tankers, provoked and tempted by the child-killing American army, were trying to pass through the mine-laid route south of the Strait of Hormuz, but after one of them exploded and caught fire, the other two quickly turned around and turned back,” the Guards said in a statement.“The powerful IRGC Navy emphasises that the Strait of Hormuz is under our control... and any ship that is deceived by the US and intends to pass without coordination with the Islamic Republic of Iran will suffer the same fate,” it added.&nbsp;

Oil prices climbed to a six-week high as fresh US strikes on Iran, Trump's warning of retaliation, and Iran's tanker restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz raised fears of major supply disruptions.

The continued tensions in the Middle East have pushed oil prices to rise more than 1.5 per cent, the highest in more than six weeks, on Thursday (Jul 23). This comes as the United States launched fresh strikes on Iran and Yemen’s Houthis targeting oil tankers in the Red Sea. Brent crude surged about 2 per cent to touch $96 a barrel in early trading, extending gains from the previous session, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose nearly 1.7 per cent to above $88 a barrel. The US military carried out a 12th consecutive strike on Iran overnight. The attack came hours after US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb a bridge or power plant in retaliation for any Iranian attack in the Strait of Hormuz. Also read | Did Iran secretly ship 70 million barrels of oil to China? Report claims $6 billion crude exported before blockade restored Trump threatens to bomb Iranian infrastructure In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said, “From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran.” Iran stops oil tankers Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said that they stopped three oil tankers from passing through the Strait of Hormuz. It did not say where the incident happened. Also read | Iran targets US bases in Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan as conflict in Middle East escalates “Three oil tankers, provoked and tempted by the child-killing American army, were trying to pass through the mine-laid route south of the Strait of Hormuz, but after one of them exploded and caught fire, the other two quickly turned around and turned back,” the Guards said in a statement. “The powerful IRGC Navy emphasises that the Strait of Hormuz is under our control... and any ship that is deceived by the US and intends to pass without coordination with the Islamic Republic of Iran will suffer the same fate,” it added.

Oil prices climbed to a six-week high as fresh US strikes on Iran, Trump's warning of retaliation, and Iran's tanker restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz raised fears of major supply disruptions.

‘Will bomb and destroy...’: Trump’s latest Iran warning sends oil prices soaring

The Middle East conflict has entered another dangerous phase as the United States launched its 12th consecutive night of strikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure. President Donald Trump declared that Iran is "not ready to make a deal," while insisting Tehran will eventually agree under mounting military pressure.

Meanwhile, Yemen's Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, intensifying fears over global shipping routes and energy security. Kuwait reported intercepting hostile drones, while the US House approved a $95 billion budget package supporting operations linked to the Iran conflict. The United States and Saudi Arabia also signed a landmark civil nuclear cooperation agreement. In South America, mass protests erupted in Argentina against President Javier Milei's austerity measures, while Tesla missed Wall Street expectations despite billion-dollar profits.

US hits Iran for 12th night | Trump says Iran not ready for deal | Houthis strike Saudi tankers

The US House of Representatives on Wednesday (Jul 22) narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework, with the bulk of the funding set aside for the Pentagon as the United States deepens its military campaign against Iran. The measure passed 216-214, and will now head to the Senate.So, what exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next?<h2>What did the House approve?</h2>The House passed a budget framework, not the final legislation. A budget framework establishes overall spending limits and gives lawmakers instructions to draft detailed legislation later.If the Senate also approves the framework, House Republicans can prepare the final spending package, which would later return to Congress for another vote.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/us-supreme-court-makes-it-easier-to-deport-green-card-holders-what-does-it-mean-for-indians-wion-horizons-1782271724642">US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons</a><h2>Where will the money go?</h2>The proposed package allocates $95 billion across several priorities. The biggest share, $73 billion, is earmarked for the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies.According to House Republicans, the funding is intended to support military operations linked to the ongoing war against Iran.Another $12 billion is allocated to farmers affected by President Donald Trump's trade policies.The remaining $10 billion would fund election-related programmes tied to Trump's push for nationwide voting restrictions after his broader SAVE America Act failed to secure enough support to move forward.<h2>Why is this vote politically important?</h2>The legislation, as per AFP, is widely viewed as the Republican Party's last major legislative effort before the November midterm elections. Control of Congress will be at stake in those elections, making the budget vote politically significant for President Donald Trump's second term.Republicans argue the package strengthens national security while advancing their election priorities.House Speaker Mike Johnson said the proposal puts Republicans "on a path to enacting two fundamentally simple and crucial goals: securing American elections and strengthening our homeland."<h2>Why is the Senate crucial?</h2>Despite clearing the House, the proposal still faces uncertainty. The Senate must first approve the budget framework before lawmakers can draft the final spending legislation.Republicans hope to eventually use the budget reconciliation process, which allows certain budget-related bills to pass the Senate with a simple majority instead of the usual 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster. That would reduce the need for Democratic support.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/can-india-withstand-another-west-asia-crisis-how-israel-hezbollah-iran-tensions-could-hit-its-energy-security-wion-decodes-1782374369218">Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes</a><h2>Why are Democrats opposing it?</h2>Democrats have criticised both the military spending and the administration's priorities.Representative Rosa DeLauro argued that Americans are more concerned about inflation and rising living costs than increased military spending. "The American people do not want more open-ended, aimless, expensive, and deadly wars in the Middle East. They want the price of basic necessities like food, housing, healthcare, childcare, and gasoline to go down," she said.<h2>What happens next?</h2>The budget framework now moves to the US Senate. If senators approve it, House Republicans can begin writing the detailed legislation that specifies how the money will be spent. That bill would then require approval from both chambers before becoming law.

The US House of Representatives has narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework that sets the stage for legislation funding Pentagon operations linked to the Iran war. What exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next?

The US House of Representatives on Wednesday (Jul 22) narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework, with the bulk of the funding set aside for the Pentagon as the United States deepens its military campaign against Iran. The measure passed 216-214, and will now head to the Senate. So, what exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next? What did the House approve? The House passed a budget framework, not the final legislation. A budget framework establishes overall spending limits and gives lawmakers instructions to draft detailed legislation later. If the Senate also approves the framework, House Republicans can prepare the final spending package, which would later return to Congress for another vote. Also read | US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons Where will the money go? The proposed package allocates $95 billion across several priorities. The biggest share, $73 billion, is earmarked for the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies. According to House Republicans, the funding is intended to support military operations linked to the ongoing war against Iran. Another $12 billion is allocated to farmers affected by President Donald Trump's trade policies. The remaining $10 billion would fund election-related programmes tied to Trump's push for nationwide voting restrictions after his broader SAVE America Act failed to secure enough support to move forward. Why is this vote politically important? The legislation, as per AFP, is widely viewed as the Republican Party's last major legislative effort before the November midterm elections. Control of Congress will be at stake in those elections, making the budget vote politically significant for President Donald Trump's second term. Republicans argue the package strengthens national security while advancing their election priorities. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the proposal puts Republicans "on a path to enacting two fundamentally simple and crucial goals: securing American elections and strengthening our homeland." Why is the Senate crucial? Despite clearing the House, the proposal still faces uncertainty. The Senate must first approve the budget framework before lawmakers can draft the final spending legislation. Republicans hope to eventually use the budget reconciliation process, which allows certain budget-related bills to pass the Senate with a simple majority instead of the usual 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster. That would reduce the need for Democratic support. Also read | Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes Why are Democrats opposing it? Democrats have criticised both the military spending and the administration's priorities. Representative Rosa DeLauro argued that Americans are more concerned about inflation and rising living costs than increased military spending. "The American people do not want more open-ended, aimless, expensive, and deadly wars in the Middle East. They want the price of basic necessities like food, housing, healthcare, childcare, and gasoline to go down," she said. What happens next? The budget framework now moves to the US Senate. If senators approve it, House Republicans can begin writing the detailed legislation that specifies how the money will be spent. That bill would then require approval from both chambers before becoming law.

The US House of Representatives has narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework that sets the stage for legislation funding Pentagon operations linked to the Iran war. What exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next?

US House approves $95 billion budget for Trump's war against Iran. Where will the money go?

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has claimed that the United States achieved no “strategic gains” from its military campaign against Iran, while accusing some European countries of endangering regional and global security by supporting Washington’s actions.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-launches-12th-straight-round-of-strikes-on-iranian-military-targets-details-inside-1784761432462">US launches 12th straight round of strikes on Iranian military targets. Details inside</a>&nbsp;In a post on X on Wednesday (July 22), Gharibabadi said he presented Iran’s position on the conflict during a meeting with 25 European ambassadors and chargés d’affaires in Tehran.“I reminded them that in the 40-day war, we imposed a severe defeat on the aggressors. In this new round of military aggression as well, we will resolutely defend our homeland and national interests,” he wrote.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/they-re-getting-hit-so-hard-trump-says-iran-will-be-ready-to-make-deal-very-soon-1784757782967">'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’</a>&nbsp;Gharibabadi argued that the military confrontations had failed to deliver any meaningful outcome for the United States.&nbsp;&nbsp;“These wars have created no strategic gains for America and only endanger regional and global peace and security,” he said. He added that Europe was expected to uphold the United Nations Charter and international law by condemning acts of aggression.&nbsp;The Iranian official said some European countries, including Spain, had adopted what he described as “principled positions” during the conflict. However, he criticised European states that allowed the US to launch attacks on Iran from their territory, describing them as “among the aggressors”.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;Gharibabadi also urged European governments to take a more independent diplomatic role, saying the continent should act as “the driving force of diplomacy, not a follower of the aggressor’s power”.&nbsp;His remarks come amid continued diplomatic tensions following the recent conflict, with Tehran maintaining that it acted in self-defence while accusing the United States and its allies of violating international law.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated the US achieved no strategic gains in recent military aggression, while criticising European nations for supporting Washington and endangering global security.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has claimed that the United States achieved no “strategic gains” from its military campaign against Iran, while accusing some European countries of endangering regional and global security by supporting Washington’s actions. Also read: US launches 12th straight round of strikes on Iranian military targets. Details inside In a post on X on Wednesday (July 22), Gharibabadi said he presented Iran’s position on the conflict during a meeting with 25 European ambassadors and chargés d’affaires in Tehran. “I reminded them that in the 40-day war, we imposed a severe defeat on the aggressors. In this new round of military aggression as well, we will resolutely defend our homeland and national interests,” he wrote. Also read: 'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’ Gharibabadi argued that the military confrontations had failed to deliver any meaningful outcome for the United States. “These wars have created no strategic gains for America and only endanger regional and global peace and security,” he said. He added that Europe was expected to uphold the United Nations Charter and international law by condemning acts of aggression. The Iranian official said some European countries, including Spain, had adopted what he described as “principled positions” during the conflict. However, he criticised European states that allowed the US to launch attacks on Iran from their territory, describing them as “among the aggressors”. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness Gharibabadi also urged European governments to take a more independent diplomatic role, saying the continent should act as “the driving force of diplomacy, not a follower of the aggressor’s power”. His remarks come amid continued diplomatic tensions following the recent conflict, with Tehran maintaining that it acted in self-defence while accusing the United States and its allies of violating international law.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated the US achieved no strategic gains in recent military aggression, while criticising European nations for supporting Washington and endangering global security.

'No strategic gains': Iran says US war backfired, slams Europe's role

US President Donald Trump travelled to Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday (July 22) to receive the remains of four American service members killed in separate Iranian attacks, as he vowed that Tehran would “pay a big price” for the deaths.&nbsp;According to US officials, three of the troops were killed when an Iranian missile struck their barracks in Jordan, while a fourth service member died in Iraq during the controlled detonation of an Iranian attack drone.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/they-re-getting-hit-so-hard-trump-says-iran-will-be-ready-to-make-deal-very-soon-1784757782967">'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’</a>&nbsp;Before departing for Dover, Trump delivered a stern warning to Iran, saying the country would face serious consequences.&nbsp;“They’re going to pay a big price,” Trump told reporters, without elaborating on what action the United States might take. The visit came amid escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran following a series of military exchanges that have raised fears of a broader regional conflict.&nbsp;Despite the hardline warning, Trump struck a more optimistic tone when discussing the possibility of diplomacy. Speaking later at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, he said he believed Iran would eventually return to negotiations.&nbsp;Trump characterised the conflict as a “skirmish” rather than a full-scale war, arguing that Tehran wanted to reach an agreement but had not yet settled on its position. “I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-does-not-control-strait-of-hormuz-centcom-rebuts-irgc-s-bold-claim-1784754761236">'Iran does not control Strait of Hormuz': CENTCOM rebuts IRGC's bold claim</a>&nbsp;He added that Iran was “getting hit so hard” and would be ready to make a deal “very soon”, although he claimed the country’s leadership continued to shift its stance during negotiations.Trump’s remarks reflect the administration’s dual approach of increasing pressure on Tehran while maintaining that a negotiated settlement remains possible, even as military hostilities continue.

President Donald Trump warned Iran it will “pay a big price” after receiving the remains of four US service members killed in Jordan and Iraq, while still expressing hope for negotiations.

US President Donald Trump travelled to Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday (July 22) to receive the remains of four American service members killed in separate Iranian attacks, as he vowed that Tehran would “pay a big price” for the deaths. According to US officials, three of the troops were killed when an Iranian missile struck their barracks in Jordan, while a fourth service member died in Iraq during the controlled detonation of an Iranian attack drone. Also read: 'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’ Before departing for Dover, Trump delivered a stern warning to Iran, saying the country would face serious consequences. “They’re going to pay a big price,” Trump told reporters, without elaborating on what action the United States might take. The visit came amid escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran following a series of military exchanges that have raised fears of a broader regional conflict. Despite the hardline warning, Trump struck a more optimistic tone when discussing the possibility of diplomacy. Speaking later at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, he said he believed Iran would eventually return to negotiations. Trump characterised the conflict as a “skirmish” rather than a full-scale war, arguing that Tehran wanted to reach an agreement but had not yet settled on its position. “I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said. Also read: 'Iran does not control Strait of Hormuz': CENTCOM rebuts IRGC's bold claim He added that Iran was “getting hit so hard” and would be ready to make a deal “very soon”, although he claimed the country’s leadership continued to shift its stance during negotiations. Trump’s remarks reflect the administration’s dual approach of increasing pressure on Tehran while maintaining that a negotiated settlement remains possible, even as military hostilities continue.

President Donald Trump warned Iran it will “pay a big price” after receiving the remains of four US service members killed in Jordan and Iraq, while still expressing hope for negotiations.

'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (July 22) described the ongoing conflict with Iran as a “skirmish”, saying Tehran was eager to negotiate but was not yet prepared to finalise a deal because it continued to change its position.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;Speaking at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, Trump said he believed Iran would eventually return to the negotiating table despite the current hostilities.&nbsp;“I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said while referring to the conflict.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/he-s-the-architect-of-the-genocide-against-palestinians-despite-trump-s-remark-mamdani-repeats-netanyahu-will-be-arrested-if-visits-us-1784666149643">‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump on Iran War: I call it a skirmish. We have a skirmish with the Islamic Republic of Iran. They are getting hit so hard they want to make a deal, but I say they are not ready to make a deal. <a href="https://t.co/jPM8yAlW7n">pic.twitter.com/jPM8yAlW7n</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://x.com/clashreport/status/2080018886083149871?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He claimed Iran was under increasing military pressure and suggested that was pushing Tehran towards negotiations. “They’re getting hit so hard, and they want to make a deal,” Trump said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/intended-to-degrade-iranian-military-capabilities-us-continues-to-strike-iran-on-10th-consecutive-day-1784581451083">‘Intended to degrade Iranian military capabilities’: US continues to strike Iran on 10th consecutive day</a>&nbsp;However, the US president argued that Iran was not yet ready to reach an agreement because it kept altering the terms during negotiations.&nbsp;“But I say they’re not ready to make a deal, because every time they make a deal, they want to change it and everything. They’re not ready. They’ll be ready very soon,” Trump said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/eye-for-an-eye-iran-threatens-regional-energy-network-after-trump-s-strike-warning-1784748454678">'Eye for an eye': Iran threatens regional energy network after Trump's strike warning</a>&nbsp;Trump did not provide further details on the status of any ongoing diplomatic contacts or specify what terms Iran was seeking to change. His remarks come amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran as the conflict continues, with both sides exchanging threats alongside military action.

Donald Trump described the Iran conflict as a “skirmish,” claiming military pressure will push Tehran to negotiate soon, though altering terms has delayed a finalised deal.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (July 22) described the ongoing conflict with Iran as a “skirmish”, saying Tehran was eager to negotiate but was not yet prepared to finalise a deal because it continued to change its position. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness Speaking at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, Trump said he believed Iran would eventually return to the negotiating table despite the current hostilities. “I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said while referring to the conflict. Also read: ‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US

Donald Trump described the Iran conflict as a “skirmish,” claiming military pressure will push Tehran to negotiate soon, though altering terms has delayed a finalised deal.

'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’

us-iran-war

Us Iran War, News on Us Iran War, stories on Us Iran War, articles on Us Iran War, Us Iran War stories at Wion, Us Iran War news, Us Iran War latest news

us iran-war

'Powerful response': US launches fresh revenge strikes on Iran after Trump vow to 'hit back hard'

Pentagon prepares 2-week Iran air plan as Trump weighs next move: Report

Pentagon Faces Backlash Over US Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Under Fire

Iran rejects Oman's Strait of Hormuz plan as US-Saudi strikes hit Iraq

‘Dangerous escalation’: US, Saudi strike Iran-backed group in Iraq

Oil prices jump over 3% after US says it intercepted Iranian missile attack

Iran launches first attack on US forces since Trump halted strikes

Russia helped Iran target US bases in the Gulf? Trump says he'll ask Putin

Ready for 'strong military action' against Iran if talks fail, warns Trump

US-Iran War: US says Trump pausing strikes to give space to diplomacy

Will Iran war last months or even years? Here's what most Americans think

Iran tells Pakistan it has not withdrawn from negotiations but suspended them

Houthis Target Saudi Oil Tankers | Red Sea Blockade Escalates | US Faces New Middle East Crisis

From fuel security to grid security: The next chapter of India's energy transition

US-Iran war | Trump: Iran is taking negotiations more seriously than before

‘If they had nuclear weapon...: Trump’s fresh jibe at Iran

US imposes new sanctions against Iranian billionaire Zanjani for enabling regime

'Not in their interests': Trump warns China, Russia against selling arms to Iran

Trump preparing massive Iran strike? | Gulf war escalates, oil prices hit new highs | US- Iran War

Trump warns Iran has 'evil intentions', vows it will 'never' get nuclear weapons

Iran's Ghalibaf mocks US strategy after oil prices surge past $100

Khamenei’s adviser warns of ‘severe’ response to any US strikes on power plants

Middle East on ‘edge of unimaginable’ as US-Iran war fuels regional tensions: UN

Iran Attacks US Bases | PM Modi's Fast-Track Courts | Europe Wildfires | Korea Election Raid

CJP Protest | China-India Talks | US Strikes Iran | Ukraine Peace Talks | Nigeria Attack | Wildfire

‘Will bomb, destroy...’: Trump’s latest Iran warning sends oil prices soaring