Maharashtra is considering tighter curbs on social media speech, with the state government exploring an amendment to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) that could make online defamation a criminal offence. A high-level committee led by the Maharashtra DGP is examining ways to tackle unverified, defamatory and potentially harmful digital posts, reviving debate over free speech and criminal liability online.


Maharashtra weighs tougher Social Media regulations under BNS

Law enforcement and cyber safety watchdogs are sounding urgent alarms over a disturbing surge in online exploitation rings—such as violent extremist and extortion networks—that are actively targeting both adults and children to generate and distribute illegal content. Operating across mainstream gaming platforms, social media, and encrypted messaging apps, cybercriminals use grooming, fake personas, and financial manipulation to trap victims.


Cybercriminals target adults and children for inmate content

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday (Aug 12) warned the Indian youth against social media trends and the shortcut culture of reels. Instead, he urged them to read autobiographies that offer lessons that can shape both character and an understanding of history. Speaking at the launch of former President Ram Nath Kovind’s autobiography, ‘Triumph of the Indian Republic: My Life, My Struggles’, Modi said the book could serve as an inspiration for future generations.“I once again wish him the best for his autobiography and especially request the young generation: it’s the age of reels, social media influencers take you away, but in this age of shortcuts, we must remember one thing written on railway stations: ‘Shortcuts will cut you short.’ If you want to take a shortcut, I tell the youth, whoever’s autobiography you like, please read it,” the Prime Minister said.Modi praised Kovind for continuing public work after leaving Rashtrapati Bhavan, particularly his efforts to build support for the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal.“Kovind ji has also elaborated on his experiences with Morarji Bhai Desai... Even after stepping down from the highest office of President, he has not paused to rest; he continues to work on significant issues such as 'One Nation, One Election,' striving to awaken the nation to their importance. Finding a solution to this issue could herald a new chapter for the country's democracy,” he said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">PM Modi’s message to youngsters: &#39;&#39;Shortcuts will cut you short.&#39;&#39; He urges youngsters to read, saying, &#39;&#39;I would particularly like to urge the younger generation-we live in the age of ‘Reels’ and social media influencers. Even in this era of shortcuts, let us remember… <a href="https://t.co/CNzgOVvjc2">pic.twitter.com/CNzgOVvjc2</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://x.com/WIONews/status/2087407868551237954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Prime Minister also spoke at length about Kovind’s humility, recalling how the former President would personally walk him to the car despite protocol. He cited Kovind’s visit to his native village, where he touched the feet of his teachers and paid tribute to the soil of his village.“After becoming President, when he visited his village, Paraunkh, he bowed to touch the feet of his teachers in reverence. He paid homage to the soil of the village and expressed his gratitude to the ordinary villagers. The entire nation witnessed that moving scene. His conduct presented an image of India's cultural values to the world--an image that fills every Indian with pride,” the prime minister said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-logs-wettest-first-week-of-august-in-15-years-imd-issues-yellow-alert-1786162317140">Delhi logs wettest first week of August in 15 years; IMD issues yellow alert</a>Modi also reflected on a deeply personal episode from Kovind’s childhood — the loss of his mother in a house fire – describing it as a tragedy that revealed the resilience behind the former President’s life journey and public service.“Just imagine – experiencing such a tragedy at a tender age, losing one’s mother in this manner... how agonising that must have been,” he said.PM Modi said, “I have been fortunate; my mother lived for over a hundred years and continued to bless me. Yet, even today, I deeply feel the void left by her absence.”“His struggles are personal, but the victories that emerged from those struggles belong to India's Republic and its democracy. We often see that people take credit for their successes but blame society for the difficulties in their lives. But when a person has a generous heart and is guided by Indian values, they focus on the positive aspects of society and consider society an equal partner in their success. Kovind ji's autobiography and its title are examples of this,” he added.

PM Modi urged young people to avoid shortcuts and social media distractions, saying “shortcuts will cut you short.” He encouraged them to read autobiographies, calling them a source of inspiration and history.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday (Aug 12) warned the Indian youth against social media trends and the shortcut culture of reels. Instead, he urged them to read autobiographies that offer lessons that can shape both character and an understanding of history. Speaking at the launch of former President Ram Nath Kovind’s autobiography, ‘Triumph of the Indian Republic: My Life, My Struggles’, Modi said the book could serve as an inspiration for future generations. “I once again wish him the best for his autobiography and especially request the young generation: it’s the age of reels, social media influencers take you away, but in this age of shortcuts, we must remember one thing written on railway stations: ‘Shortcuts will cut you short.’ If you want to take a shortcut, I tell the youth, whoever’s autobiography you like, please read it,” the Prime Minister said. Modi praised Kovind for continuing public work after leaving Rashtrapati Bhavan, particularly his efforts to build support for the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal. “Kovind ji has also elaborated on his experiences with Morarji Bhai Desai... Even after stepping down from the highest office of President, he has not paused to rest; he continues to work on significant issues such as 'One Nation, One Election,' striving to awaken the nation to their importance. Finding a solution to this issue could herald a new chapter for the country's democracy,” he said.

PM Modi urged young people to avoid shortcuts and social media distractions, saying “shortcuts will cut you short.” He encouraged them to read autobiographies, calling them a source of inspiration and history.

‘Shortcuts will cut you short’: PM Modi urges youth to look beyond social media reels and read autobiographies

A U.S. federal appeals court rejected an early bid by Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat, allowing over 3,000 lawsuits over youth social media addiction to proceed. The court ruled that the tech companies' defense under Section 230 was premature, paving the way for massive consolidated trials regarding children's mental health harms.


US Court opens doors to thousands of lawsuits against META

A New Mexico court has ordered Meta to pay $567 million into a teen mental health fund, ruling that Facebook and Instagram contributed to harming young users and created a public nuisance.

The court also directed Meta to implement stronger youth safety measures, including limits on teen usage, stricter controls on adult interactions with minors, notification restrictions, and safeguards against inappropriate AI chatbot interactions.

The landmark ruling could influence similar lawsuits across the United States, where dozens of states and more than 1,300 school districts are pursuing legal action against social media companies over alleged harm to children.

Meta Hit With $567 Million Penalty Over Teen Mental Health | Facebook & Instagram Under Fire

A new social media trend known as the August Dating Theory is going viral, claiming that August is the ultimate make-or-break month for relationships.

According to the trend, carefree summer romances either become serious commitments or quietly come to an end as people return to their everyday routines. The theory also suggests that ex-partners often reappear during this period, seeking familiarity and emotional comfort before autumn begins.

Following the viral June Dating Theory, which predicted unexpected romantic twists, the August theory shifts the focus to reality checks, emotional stability, and long-term relationship decisions.

August Dating Theory Goes Viral | Why Relationships Face a Make-or-Break Moment

A new controversy is brewing around Donald Trump's social media platform.

Truth Social is reportedly offering premium access to Trump's posts through a subscription-based API service costing as much as $100,000 a month. Critics argue that when presidential posts can move markets, faster access could provide a significant advantage to investors and traders.


Who's paying for Trump's market edge?

In contemporary social media ecosystems, attention is heavily commodified, observers and analysts naturally default to quantitative metrics, such as aggregate views, share velocities and algorithmic impressions to evaluate the efficacy of online campaigns. However, when applied to the complex and high-stakes domain of narrative communication, this assumption constitutes a profound analytical fallacy. In the narrative game, sheer numerical volume is rarely the primary objective. While aggregate reach can occasionally function as a blunt instrument, numerical data of likes and views does not serve as the true yardstick of narrative construction. The authentic metrics of success operate on an entirely distinct plane: one that is fundamentally psychological, deeply strategic and overwhelmingly qualitative.&nbsp;<h3>Epistemological Divergence</h3>&nbsp;To accurately assess the efficacy of information proliferation, it is imperative to disentangle the concept of narrative building from the practices of social media based businesses and marketing activities. Because both the systems utilise identical digital infrastructures, they are frequently conflated in public discourse and superficial analyses. Yet, their underlying mechanisms and ultimate objectives are the extreme opposites.&nbsp;Social media marketing is an inherently transactional discipline. It is engineered to guide a specific demographic, progressing from initial awareness to consideration and culminating in a conversion, such as a purchase or subscription.&nbsp;Conversely, narrative building operates within the cognitive, ideological domains and each narrative has specific desired end state. It seeks the systematic alteration of perceived reality. The strategic objective is to strengthen the correct and dismantle wrongly entrenched belief systems. Narrative communication seeks to fundamentally shift a target population’s perception of a geopolitical conflict, the legitimacy of state institutions or the validity of societal norms. Applying the transactional metrics of marketing to the realities of narrative communication results in a misinterpretation of the battlespace. A viral piece of digital media may represent a triumph in marketing, but it fails to permanently alter the underlying ideological convictions of its audience, a structural failure in the narrative building domain.&nbsp;<h3>Theme Builder and the Shifting Paradigms of Evaluation</h3><h3>&nbsp;</h3>Within the architecture of information communication, the yardsticks of success are exclusively aligned with the "theme builder", the strategic architect of the overarching narrative. Because strategic intent varies significantly from one campaign to the next, the criteria for success must vary proportionally. There exists no universal quantitative dashboard for victory; the goalposts are dynamic, shifting strictly according to the Theme Builder’s specific intent.&nbsp;In this arena, success is measured by behavioural modification and psychological impact rather than mere distribution. In the context of cognitive communication, the efficacy of narrative is not measured by the aggregate blast radius of a message, but by the structural damage inflicted upon an opponent's psychological resolve or decision-making capacity.&nbsp;<h3>Cognitive Yardsticks</h3>&nbsp;The theme builder's strategic intent dictates the evaluative yardsticks, the targets of narratives are exceptionally diverse. An examination of these specific target categories demonstrates precisely why reliance on aggregate numerical data is analytically deficient. Depending on the overarching intent, the objectives will shift across several distinct typologies:&nbsp;<ul><li>Geospatial Precision and Penetration: A narrative engineered to cultivate required context in an area relies entirely on specific geographical penetration. In such scenarios, millions of algorithmic impressions generated in a distant, secure metropolis are devoid of strategic value if the narrative fails to take root in the designated zone. The appropriate yardstick in this context is geographic and demographic density, rather than aggregate digital volume.</li><li>Elite Capture and Decision-Makers: Often, the designated target audience is not a mass populace, but a group of influential actors. Narratives are engineered to influence specific policymakers, leadership, cultural elites or economic regulators. Success is evaluated through the lens of asymmetrical influence.</li><li>Maintenance of Domestic Cohesion: A significant portion of narrative building is defensive to sustain national resilience at all times. The evaluative yardsticks in these mechanisms are societal unity, psychological resilience and the active prevention of panic. Success is paradoxically measured by absence: the civil unrest that fails to materialise or the societal fractures that do not expand. Strategic Deterrence of Adversaries: Outward-facing narratives are frequently designed to project strength, unpredictability or technological superiority, with the intent of deterring hostile actions by adversarial states. The primary objective is to cultivate hesitation and cognitive paralysis within the adversary's strategic command. The success of deterrence cannot be quantified via digital engagement analytics; it is strictly measured by the adversary's sustained reluctance to initiate conflict.</li><li>Tactical Reach and Algorithmic Manipulation: It must be acknowledged that high numerical reach can occasionally function as a yardstick, though primarily when the theme builder’s intent involves mass societal support or the algorithmic flooding of an information environment to suppress misinformation. In these specific, tactical deployments, sheer volume becomes a temporary yardstick. However, this represents merely one specialised tactic within a broader strategic arsenal.</li></ul>&nbsp;Information communication and narrative construction transcend the rudimentary mechanics of mass digital distribution. Analysts and observers who attempt to measure the efficacy of a narrative campaign purely through the lens of viral metrics and quantitative analytics fundamentally miscalculate the nature of cognitive threats.&nbsp;Unlike commercial marketing endeavours, narrative building is entirely devoid of seasonality. It is characterised by the relentless, continuous shaping of the cognitive domain, extending in the Time Domain. The yardsticks of the narrative game are entirely subordinated to the theme builder's strategic intent, shifting seamlessly among the psychological conditioning of key elites, hyper-local geospatial penetration, the preservation of domestic cohesion and the active deterrence of adversarial forces. To achieve a rigorous understanding of modern information manifestation, the analytical community must pivot away from aggregate numerical counting and prioritise the evaluation of cognitive yardsticks, as the narrative game is way bigger than that of numbers and maximum hits/ impressions.



Social media marketing is an inherently transactional discipline. It is engineered to guide a specific demographic, progressing from initial awareness to consideration and culminating in a conversion, such as a purchase or subscription.

In contemporary social media ecosystems, attention is heavily commodified, observers and analysts naturally default to quantitative metrics, such as aggregate views, share velocities and algorithmic impressions to evaluate the efficacy of online campaigns. However, when applied to the complex and high-stakes domain of narrative communication, this assumption constitutes a profound analytical fallacy. In the narrative game, sheer numerical volume is rarely the primary objective. While aggregate reach can occasionally function as a blunt instrument, numerical data of likes and views does not serve as the true yardstick of narrative construction. The authentic metrics of success operate on an entirely distinct plane: one that is fundamentally psychological, deeply strategic and overwhelmingly qualitative. Epistemological Divergence To accurately assess the efficacy of information proliferation, it is imperative to disentangle the concept of narrative building from the practices of social media based businesses and marketing activities. Because both the systems utilise identical digital infrastructures, they are frequently conflated in public discourse and superficial analyses. Yet, their underlying mechanisms and ultimate objectives are the extreme opposites. Social media marketing is an inherently transactional discipline. It is engineered to guide a specific demographic, progressing from initial awareness to consideration and culminating in a conversion, such as a purchase or subscription. Conversely, narrative building operates within the cognitive, ideological domains and each narrative has specific desired end state. It seeks the systematic alteration of perceived reality. The strategic objective is to strengthen the correct and dismantle wrongly entrenched belief systems. Narrative communication seeks to fundamentally shift a target population’s perception of a geopolitical conflict, the legitimacy of state institutions or the validity of societal norms. Applying the transactional metrics of marketing to the realities of narrative communication results in a misinterpretation of the battlespace. A viral piece of digital media may represent a triumph in marketing, but it fails to permanently alter the underlying ideological convictions of its audience, a structural failure in the narrative building domain. Theme Builder and the Shifting Paradigms of Evaluation Within the architecture of information communication, the yardsticks of success are exclusively aligned with the "theme builder", the strategic architect of the overarching narrative. Because strategic intent varies significantly from one campaign to the next, the criteria for success must vary proportionally. There exists no universal quantitative dashboard for victory; the goalposts are dynamic, shifting strictly according to the Theme Builder’s specific intent. In this arena, success is measured by behavioural modification and psychological impact rather than mere distribution. In the context of cognitive communication, the efficacy of narrative is not measured by the aggregate blast radius of a message, but by the structural damage inflicted upon an opponent's psychological resolve or decision-making capacity. Cognitive Yardsticks The theme builder's strategic intent dictates the evaluative yardsticks, the targets of narratives are exceptionally diverse. An examination of these specific target categories demonstrates precisely why reliance on aggregate numerical data is analytically deficient. Depending on the overarching intent, the objectives will shift across several distinct typologies: Geospatial Precision and Penetration: A narrative engineered to cultivate required context in an area relies entirely on specific geographical penetration. In such scenarios, millions of algorithmic impressions generated in a distant, secure metropolis are devoid of strategic value if the narrative fails to take root in the designated zone. The appropriate yardstick in this context is geographic and demographic density, rather than aggregate digital volume. Elite Capture and Decision-Makers: Often, the designated target audience is not a mass populace, but a group of influential actors. Narratives are engineered to influence specific policymakers, leadership, cultural elites or economic regulators. Success is evaluated through the lens of asymmetrical influence. Maintenance of Domestic Cohesion: A significant portion of narrative building is defensive to sustain national resilience at all times. The evaluative yardsticks in these mechanisms are societal unity, psychological resilience and the active prevention of panic. Success is paradoxically measured by absence: the civil unrest that fails to materialise or the societal fractures that do not expand. Strategic Deterrence of Adversaries: Outward-facing narratives are frequently designed to project strength, unpredictability or technological superiority, with the intent of deterring hostile actions by adversarial states. The primary objective is to cultivate hesitation and cognitive paralysis within the adversary's strategic command. The success of deterrence cannot be quantified via digital engagement analytics; it is strictly measured by the adversary's sustained reluctance to initiate conflict. Tactical Reach and Algorithmic Manipulation: It must be acknowledged that high numerical reach can occasionally function as a yardstick, though primarily when the theme builder’s intent involves mass societal support or the algorithmic flooding of an information environment to suppress misinformation. In these specific, tactical deployments, sheer volume becomes a temporary yardstick. However, this represents merely one specialised tactic within a broader strategic arsenal. Information communication and narrative construction transcend the rudimentary mechanics of mass digital distribution. Analysts and observers who attempt to measure the efficacy of a narrative campaign purely through the lens of viral metrics and quantitative analytics fundamentally miscalculate the nature of cognitive threats. Unlike commercial marketing endeavours, narrative building is entirely devoid of seasonality. It is characterised by the relentless, continuous shaping of the cognitive domain, extending in the Time Domain. The yardsticks of the narrative game are entirely subordinated to the theme builder's strategic intent, shifting seamlessly among the psychological conditioning of key elites, hyper-local geospatial penetration, the preservation of domestic cohesion and the active deterrence of adversarial forces. To achieve a rigorous understanding of modern information manifestation, the analytical community must pivot away from aggregate numerical counting and prioritise the evaluation of cognitive yardsticks, as the narrative game is way bigger than that of numbers and maximum hits/ impressions.

Social media marketing is an inherently transactional discipline. It is engineered to guide a specific demographic, progressing from initial awareness to consideration and culminating in a conversion, such as a purchase or subscription.

Narrative communication: Beyond social media views and impressions

Trump Media & Technology Group has launched Truth API, a premium licensed data feed that gives banks, financial institutions, and high-frequency trading firms the fastest access to posts from Truth Social's most influential accounts, including U.S. President Donald Trump.

The company says the service is designed for organizations where milliseconds matter, allowing institutional clients to receive market-moving updates faster than regular Truth Social notifications. Truth API also marks Trump Media's first major step into the financial data licensing business, opening a new revenue stream beyond social media.

Trump's Truth Social launches truth api | Wall Street gets fastest access to market-moving posts

Starting spring 2027, UK teens aged 16 and 17 will find their favourite apps switched off by default between midnight and 6am — with infinite scrolling and autoplay disabled too. The catch? They can simply flip the setting back on themselves. Critics call it toothless; the government points to a 300-teen trial that showed real gains in sleep and focus. It follows last month's full social media ban for under-16s, making the UK just the second country after Australia to go this far.


UK plans default social media curfew for 16 & 17-year-olds

Florida-based social media influencer Brianna Johnson, popularly known online as DreamDoll Brii, was shot while she was driving her lime green Lamborghini Urus in Miramar and died. 21-year-old Brianna Johnson, was inside her vehicle when a white sedan pulled up next to the vehicle and opened fire, according to NY Post. Police said the 21-year-old later “succumbed to her injuries” on Sunday.Two other people, both men, travelling in the Lamborghini were also shot. They were taken to the hospital in critical condition.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nato-unveils-billions-in-arms-deals-after-trump-s-pressure-for-higher-defence-spending-1783428507988">NATO unveils billions in arms deals after Trump’s pressure for higher defence spending</a>&nbsp;Miramar Police are still investigating the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Surveillance footage shows a light-coloured car following the Lamborghini before the gunfire. After the shots were fired, the car with the suspects sped away while the Lamborghini rolled into a property nearby.Johnson’s family told local media that she and the two other occupants had attended a large party earlier that night.&nbsp;The group later stopped at a Shell gas station, where a fight reportedly broke out. It is not yet clear whether that incident was connected to the shooting. Police have not confirmed a motive, and the investigation is underway.Following the news, tributes poured in across Instagram and TikTok, where DreamDoll Brii reportedly had a combined following of more than 470,000.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/fugitive-diamantaire-nirav-modi-loses-final-appeal-extradition-becomes-imminent-1783333083018">Fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi loses final appeal before ECHR, extradition becomes immine</a>nt&nbsp;She was best known for her song Bend Ova, which reportedly became a popular audio on TikTok. Fans shared condolence messages and remembered her for the content she regularly posted online.&nbsp;Miramar Police Chief Delrish Moss said investigators believe the attackers were targeting the vehicle. Meanwhile, witnesses told local media that the shooting sounded like a heavy burst of gunfire.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/telangana-cop-arrested-after-raids-find-disproportionate-assets-worth-rs-300-crore-1783435568416">Telangana cop arrested after raids find disproportionate assets worth Rs 300 crore</a>&nbsp;Following news of her death, messages of condolence poured in across Instagram and TikTok from fans and followers.&nbsp;&nbsp;Authorities have asked anyone with information to contact the Miramar Police Department’s Homicide Tip Line or submit an anonymous tip through Broward County Crime Stoppers.

Following the tragic news, tributes poured in across Instagram and TikTok, where DreamDoll Brii reportedly had a combined following of more than 470,000. She was best known for her song Bend Ova, which reportedly became a popular audio on TikTok.

Florida-based social media influencer Brianna Johnson, popularly known online as DreamDoll Brii, was shot while she was driving her lime green Lamborghini Urus in Miramar and died. 21-year-old Brianna Johnson, was inside her vehicle when a white sedan pulled up next to the vehicle and opened fire, according to NY Post. Police said the 21-year-old later “succumbed to her injuries” on Sunday. Two other people, both men, travelling in the Lamborghini were also shot. They were taken to the hospital in critical condition. Also Read: NATO unveils billions in arms deals after Trump’s pressure for higher defence spending Miramar Police are still investigating the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Surveillance footage shows a light-coloured car following the Lamborghini before the gunfire. After the shots were fired, the car with the suspects sped away while the Lamborghini rolled into a property nearby. Johnson’s family told local media that she and the two other occupants had attended a large party earlier that night. The group later stopped at a Shell gas station, where a fight reportedly broke out. It is not yet clear whether that incident was connected to the shooting. Police have not confirmed a motive, and the investigation is underway. Following the news, tributes poured in across Instagram and TikTok, where DreamDoll Brii reportedly had a combined following of more than 470,000. Also Read: Fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi loses final appeal before ECHR, extradition becomes imminent She was best known for her song Bend Ova, which reportedly became a popular audio on TikTok. Fans shared condolence messages and remembered her for the content she regularly posted online. Miramar Police Chief Delrish Moss said investigators believe the attackers were targeting the vehicle. Meanwhile, witnesses told local media that the shooting sounded like a heavy burst of gunfire. Also Read: Telangana cop arrested after raids find disproportionate assets worth Rs 300 crore Following news of her death, messages of condolence poured in across Instagram and TikTok from fans and followers. Authorities have asked anyone with information to contact the Miramar Police Department’s Homicide Tip Line or submit an anonymous tip through Broward County Crime Stoppers.

Following the tragic news, tributes poured in across Instagram and TikTok, where DreamDoll Brii reportedly had a combined following of more than 470,000. She was best known for her song Bend Ova, which reportedly became a popular audio on TikTok.

Florida: Social media influencer DreamDoll Brii, 21, shot in Lamborghini; dies

An Indonesian couple was publicly caned in Aceh province on Thursday (Jul 2) after a Sharia court found them guilty of violating Islamic law by kissing during a TikTok livestream. The pair, a 22-year-old man and a 25-year-old woman, received 21 lashes each as the crowd gathered watched. Their initial sentence of 25 lashes as punishment was reduced as they had spent four months in prison.The punishment was witnessed by at least 100 people at Bustanussalatin City Park, where public canings are regularly held under Aceh’s Islamic legal system. A group of people wearing robes and hoods carried out the whipping on a stage.The couple was arrested after a livestream on February 27, in which they kissed while sitting in a car in Banda Aceh. The video of the livestream went viral on social media, following which local residents reported the incident to Sharia enforcement authorities. The couple was then arrested in April and later prosecuted. The court had also ordered the destruction of a mobile phone and a USB drive containing the viral video, treating them as evidence in the case.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-military-reshuffle-incoming-seating-at-beijing-event-raises-questions-1783064151720">China’s military reshuffle incoming? Seating order at Beijing event raises questions</a>Aceh is the only Indonesian province permitted to enforce Sharia law, a privilege granted under a 2006 autonomy agreement following the end of a decades-long separatist conflict. Its Islamic criminal code prescribes corporal punishment of up to 100 lashes for offences ranging from gambling, alcohol consumption, adultery, gay sex and certain acts considered violations of public morality. Caning is also allowed to punish women who wear tight clothes or men who skip Friday prayers. In 2015, several provisions were expanded to also cover non-Muslim residents.Apart from the young couple, four other people were also caned on Thursday for gambling and adultery.Human rights organisations have repeatedly condemned Aceh’s public canings. Amnesty International Indonesia said the practice is cruel, inhumane and degrading.“Such behaviour might be considered inappropriate because social media is viewed by people of various age groups, including children. But is it a crime that warrants imprisonment or even caning? That would be excessive,” said Usman Hamid, the executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia, on Thursday (Jul 2).Watch | Jakarta landfill fires continue for 3rd day<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/jakarta-landfill-fires-continue-for-3rd-day-1783062746546/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/jakarta-landfill-fires-continue-for-3rd-day-1783062746546/embed</a>&nbsp;

An Indonesian couple was publicly caned in Aceh after kissing during a TikTok livestream. Rights groups condemned the punishment as cruel and disproportionate.

An Indonesian couple was publicly caned in Aceh province on Thursday (Jul 2) after a Sharia court found them guilty of violating Islamic law by kissing during a TikTok livestream. The pair, a 22-year-old man and a 25-year-old woman, received 21 lashes each as the crowd gathered watched. Their initial sentence of 25 lashes as punishment was reduced as they had spent four months in prison. The punishment was witnessed by at least 100 people at Bustanussalatin City Park, where public canings are regularly held under Aceh’s Islamic legal system. A group of people wearing robes and hoods carried out the whipping on a stage. The couple was arrested after a livestream on February 27, in which they kissed while sitting in a car in Banda Aceh. The video of the livestream went viral on social media, following which local residents reported the incident to Sharia enforcement authorities. The couple was then arrested in April and later prosecuted. The court had also ordered the destruction of a mobile phone and a USB drive containing the viral video, treating them as evidence in the case. Also read | China’s military reshuffle incoming? Seating order at Beijing event raises questions Aceh is the only Indonesian province permitted to enforce Sharia law, a privilege granted under a 2006 autonomy agreement following the end of a decades-long separatist conflict. Its Islamic criminal code prescribes corporal punishment of up to 100 lashes for offences ranging from gambling, alcohol consumption, adultery, gay sex and certain acts considered violations of public morality. Caning is also allowed to punish women who wear tight clothes or men who skip Friday prayers. In 2015, several provisions were expanded to also cover non-Muslim residents. Apart from the young couple, four other people were also caned on Thursday for gambling and adultery. Human rights organisations have repeatedly condemned Aceh’s public canings. Amnesty International Indonesia said the practice is cruel, inhumane and degrading. “Such behaviour might be considered inappropriate because social media is viewed by people of various age groups, including children. But is it a crime that warrants imprisonment or even caning? That would be excessive,” said Usman Hamid, the executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia, on Thursday (Jul 2). Watch | Jakarta landfill fires continue for 3rd day https://www.wionews.com/videos/jakarta-landfill-fires-continue-for-3rd-day-1783062746546/embed

An Indonesian couple was publicly caned in Aceh after kissing during a TikTok livestream. Rights groups condemned the punishment as cruel and disproportionate.

Indonesian couple punished with public caning for kissing on TikTok livestream

#Gravitas People across the world observe Social Media Day every year on June 30. Social media users account for more than 68% of the global population.


How much of your life is spent on social media?

A Dettol advertisement comparing "toxic men" to germs fell on its face after facing backlash in China, for showing a man seeking a "clean and untouched woman." The company has apologised and withdrawn the advert. The five-minute clip is basically a microdrama and was released on several platforms in May. It starts with a man in a relationship comparing his current partner to his ex. He says he found out that his former girlfriends had lived with another man previously. He starts recalling the times she was forward and open with physical contact. He then breaks up with her, saying it felt like receiving “secondhand service”. He then tells his friend that he wants a “clean and untouched” woman to marry. “I may not be a virgin, but my future wife has to be," the man says.&nbsp;He then bumps into another woman. He says, “Thank goodness I met her. Clean and pure, never contaminated by a man. I've dated over a dozen girls, and I've finally found one who's pure... who hasn't done it before, you know?”<h2>&nbsp;</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Oh, Dettol, you really did this one dirty. Dettol has upset the Chinese internet today over a bizarre ad campaign featuring a man looking for a woman who is &quot;clean&quot; enough to marry. At one point, he says: &quot;It’s okay if I’m not her first, but not when it comes to my future wife.… <a href="https://t.co/DRAs7vpmu6">pic.twitter.com/DRAs7vpmu6</a>&mdash; Manya Koetse (@manyapan) <a href="https://x.com/manyapan/status/2069052432529629254?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Chinese social media users slam Dettol ad</h2>When his girlfriend finds out about his views on women, she starts seeing the misogyny in him. The woman then breaks up with him. The advert ends with the words: "A toxic man is just like these germs – you need Dettol to eliminate them completely to feel at ease." Chinese social media users are furious with the Dettol ad, which the company has now taken down amid calls for a boycott of the brand. "What a trashy advertisement. It's left me speechless," a user wrote on Chinese social media platform Weibo, with another adding, “I will never use Dettol again.”<h2>Dettol responds to criticism of new ad</h2>&nbsp;Responding to the backlash, the company said that the idea behind the ad was to "challenge unequal gender attitudes and promote healthy, confident views on relationships and lifestyles". &nbsp;But the edited videos on social media have muddled up the real message of the advert, it added. The brand said the micro drama was produced by a third party, and it took “responsibility for any negligence in creating and reviewing the content of the advert”. It said: “We are well aware that true protection also lies in safeguarding the dignity of every individual and their right to be treated equally.”&nbsp;

Dettol's new ad in China shows a man seeking a virgin and a “clean” wife. He tells his friend that he might not be a virgin, but his future wife has to be. The ad compares toxic men with germs towards the end. It has been taken down after people criticised the ad. 

A Dettol advertisement comparing "toxic men" to germs fell on its face after facing backlash in China, for showing a man seeking a "clean and untouched woman." The company has apologised and withdrawn the advert. The five-minute clip is basically a microdrama and was released on several platforms in May. It starts with a man in a relationship comparing his current partner to his ex. He says he found out that his former girlfriends had lived with another man previously. He starts recalling the times she was forward and open with physical contact. He then breaks up with her, saying it felt like receiving “secondhand service”. He then tells his friend that he wants a “clean and untouched” woman to marry. “I may not be a virgin, but my future wife has to be," the man says. He then bumps into another woman. He says, “Thank goodness I met her. Clean and pure, never contaminated by a man. I've dated over a dozen girls, and I've finally found one who's pure... who hasn't done it before, you know?”

Dettol's new ad in China shows a man seeking a virgin and a “clean” wife. He tells his friend that he might not be a virgin, but his future wife has to be. The ad compares toxic men with germs towards the end. It has been taken down after people criticised the ad.&nbsp;

Dettol takes down controversial ad about 'toxic men' and gender double standards

The UAE has become the first Arab nation to introduce age restrictions for social media use, marking a significant step in online safety regulation. The move is aimed at protecting children and teenagers from harmful content, cyberbullying, privacy risks and excessive screen time. As governments around the world debate how to make digital platforms safer for younger users, the UAE's decision could become a model for other countries in the region considering similar measures.


UAE Becomes First Arab Nation To Set Social Media Age Limits 

The UK government is considering tougher online safety measures that could restrict access to social media for children under 16. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has backed proposals aimed at protecting young people from harmful online content, excessive screen time and mental health risks. The plans may also extend to gaming and livestreaming platforms, sparking a wider debate over child safety, digital freedom and the role of technology companies in safeguarding young users.

UK To Ban Social Media For Under-16s: Proposes Sweeping Online Safety Curbs

It happens to many of us. Ten minutes turns to 30, then 30 turns to an hour, and suddenly it is two hours since you have been doomscrolling on social media. Whether it is cute cat videos, funny memes, or news content, scrolling social media for hours has become a part of the daily routine for many people, with some even becoming addicted to social media. Amid rising concerns over social media, governments have also started taking action, banning it for teenagers across several nations.Scientists are increasingly studying what makes people hooked on social media and how it affects attention, mood and behaviour. While experts caution against claims that smartphones are “destroying” the brain, evidence suggests that digital platforms can reinforce habits that shape how we consume information.<h2>Why your brain loves endless scrolling</h2>Our social media feeds are endless, which makes it difficult to stop scrolling. While a book has a final page, or a TV show has an ending, our Instagram or Facebook feeds just don’t end. This creates a curiosity: What will be the next post? Our brain, which gets addicted to the dopamine it gets every time your favourite content pops up on the feed, seeks more rewards. As a result, many people continue scrolling for way longer than they intended to get their next rewarding experience.<h2>The dopamine myth and the power of variable rewards</h2>Dopamine is not simply a “feel-good” chemical. It also plays a key role in motivation and reward-seeking behaviour. Psychologists often compare social media feeds to slot machines because both rely on unpredictable rewards. A user might find a funny video, an exciting update or a message from a friend after several swipes. The timing is never certain.Experts call this a variable reward schedule. Because rewards arrive unpredictably, users remain motivated to continue searching. In many cases, the anticipation of a reward becomes just as powerful as the reward itself. This may explain why some people continue to scroll even when they are no longer enjoying the content.Also read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/wion-decodes-why-does-coffee-calm-some-people-instead-of-waking-them-up-here-s-what-science-says-1780995139137"> WION Decodes | Why does coffee calm some people instead of waking them up? Here’s what science says</a><h2>A need for novelty</h2>Our brain pays attention to novelty. New information could give us an opportunity, a resource, or a threat. Humans are naturally attracted to unknown experiences – and social media never fails to provide us with fresh content. With every new post, users encounter a new image, video, opinion or headline. This feeds our brains the constant stimulation it desires.Over time, this pattern can encourage rapid switching between different pieces of information. Researchers suggest that constant exposure to highly stimulating content may make slower activities such as reading, studying or deep work feel less engaging by comparison.<h2>Mental health feedback loop</h2>Scrolling becomes even more compelling when content triggers strong emotions. According to researchers, anxiety and information consumption often reinforce one another. People who feel worried may seek more information to reduce uncertainty. But the repeated exposure to content may also increase stress rather than helping them feel better.This creates a feedback loop in which anxiety fuels more scrolling, and more scrolling fuels anxiety. Studies have linked excessive doomscrolling to higher levels of stress, pessimism and emotional exhaustion.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/wion-decodes-what-is-godzilla-el-ni-o-and-how-can-it-impact-the-indian-monsoon-1780917581717">WION Decodes | What is 'Godzilla' El Niño and how can it impact the Indian monsoon?</a><h2>Is scrolling really rewiring the brain?</h2>While scientists refrain from making dramatic claims such as social media is damaging the brain, neuroplasticity may explain how your digital habits can impact behaviour.Scientists generally avoid dramatic claims that social media is damaging the brain. However, the concept of neuroplasticity helps explain how digital habits can shape behaviour.Neuroplasticity is the brain’s ability to adapt through repeated experiences. The neural pathways that are used frequently become stronger over time. Habits based on novelty, rapid rewards and constant task-switching can become increasingly automatic over time.Social media itself is not harmful and can help educate, entertain and content people. However, it becomes a problem when the endless feeds start replacing focused work, meaningful interactions and time away from screens. Understanding the science behind scrolling reveals that the struggle to stop is not simply about willpower. It is also about these platforms designed to keep attention engaged for as long as possible. WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed</a> &nbsp;

What turns a quick social media check into an hour-long scroll? Here’s what neuroscience and psychology say about the habit and its impact on the brain.

It happens to many of us. Ten minutes turns to 30, then 30 turns to an hour, and suddenly it is two hours since you have been doomscrolling on social media. Whether it is cute cat videos, funny memes, or news content, scrolling social media for hours has become a part of the daily routine for many people, with some even becoming addicted to social media. Amid rising concerns over social media, governments have also started taking action, banning it for teenagers across several nations. Scientists are increasingly studying what makes people hooked on social media and how it affects attention, mood and behaviour. While experts caution against claims that smartphones are “destroying” the brain, evidence suggests that digital platforms can reinforce habits that shape how we consume information. Why your brain loves endless scrolling Our social media feeds are endless, which makes it difficult to stop scrolling. While a book has a final page, or a TV show has an ending, our Instagram or Facebook feeds just don’t end. This creates a curiosity: What will be the next post? Our brain, which gets addicted to the dopamine it gets every time your favourite content pops up on the feed, seeks more rewards. As a result, many people continue scrolling for way longer than they intended to get their next rewarding experience. The dopamine myth and the power of variable rewards Dopamine is not simply a “feel-good” chemical. It also plays a key role in motivation and reward-seeking behaviour. Psychologists often compare social media feeds to slot machines because both rely on unpredictable rewards. A user might find a funny video, an exciting update or a message from a friend after several swipes. The timing is never certain. Experts call this a variable reward schedule. Because rewards arrive unpredictably, users remain motivated to continue searching. In many cases, the anticipation of a reward becomes just as powerful as the reward itself. This may explain why some people continue to scroll even when they are no longer enjoying the content. Also read | WION Decodes | Why does coffee calm some people instead of waking them up? Here’s what science says A need for novelty Our brain pays attention to novelty. New information could give us an opportunity, a resource, or a threat. Humans are naturally attracted to unknown experiences – and social media never fails to provide us with fresh content. With every new post, users encounter a new image, video, opinion or headline. This feeds our brains the constant stimulation it desires. Over time, this pattern can encourage rapid switching between different pieces of information. Researchers suggest that constant exposure to highly stimulating content may make slower activities such as reading, studying or deep work feel less engaging by comparison. Mental health feedback loop Scrolling becomes even more compelling when content triggers strong emotions. According to researchers, anxiety and information consumption often reinforce one another. People who feel worried may seek more information to reduce uncertainty. But the repeated exposure to content may also increase stress rather than helping them feel better. This creates a feedback loop in which anxiety fuels more scrolling, and more scrolling fuels anxiety. Studies have linked excessive doomscrolling to higher levels of stress, pessimism and emotional exhaustion. Also read | WION Decodes | What is 'Godzilla' El Niño and how can it impact the Indian monsoon? Is scrolling really rewiring the brain? While scientists refrain from making dramatic claims such as social media is damaging the brain, neuroplasticity may explain how your digital habits can impact behaviour. Scientists generally avoid dramatic claims that social media is damaging the brain. However, the concept of neuroplasticity helps explain how digital habits can shape behaviour. Neuroplasticity is the brain’s ability to adapt through repeated experiences. The neural pathways that are used frequently become stronger over time. Habits based on novelty, rapid rewards and constant task-switching can become increasingly automatic over time. Social media itself is not harmful and can help educate, entertain and content people. However, it becomes a problem when the endless feeds start replacing focused work, meaningful interactions and time away from screens. Understanding the science behind scrolling reveals that the struggle to stop is not simply about willpower. It is also about these platforms designed to keep attention engaged for as long as possible. WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed

From dopamine-driven rewards to doomscrolling, here's what science says about why people keep scrolling and how the habit can shape the brain.

The science behind why you keep scrolling – and how it rewires your brain

A growing number of young people are choosing screen time over face-to-face social interactions, as smartphones, social media, gaming, and streaming platforms increasingly shape modern lifestyles. Experts warn that excessive digital dependence could impact mental health, communication skills, and real-world relationships among teenagers and young adults.

From scrolling endlessly on social media to spending hours online, screens are becoming the primary source of entertainment, connection, and comfort for many. While technology offers convenience and global connectivity, psychologists say balancing digital life with real-world socialising is becoming more important than ever.

More Young People Prefer Screens Over Socialising

In an increasingly digital world, Japan is witnessing a resurgence of zines: self-published, independently created magazines that celebrate creativity, personal expression and community. From artists and writers to hobbyists and activists, more people are turning to DIY publishing as a way to share ideas beyond the algorithms of social media.

The growing zine movement reflects a broader desire for tangible, personal and authentic forms of communication in the digital age.

Japan Embraces Zine Trend: A Quiet DIY Revolution In The Digital Age

Malaysia has introduced strict new rules requiring social media platforms to verify the age of their users through identity checks and other approved methods. Authorities say the move is aimed at improving online safety and protecting minors from harmful content. Companies that fail to comply could face penalties of up to $2.5 million.


Malaysia Cracks Down on Social Media, Makes Age Verification Mandatory 

Amid rising use of social media across the world, a report highlighted that urban Indian young adults are spending more than 120 minutes on social media each day. According to a joint report by VTION and the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), urban Indian youth, aged between 18 and 24 years, are using social media significantly more than the overall social media average of 97.9 minutes daily.The report studied digital consumption patterns in urban India, which vary sharply across age groups and genders. It added that while social media is largely dominated by the younger users, the entertainment category is led by consumers aged 35 and above. The older demographic spends an average of 77.2 minutes per day on entertainment platforms, making it one of the highest-engagement digital categories.The report also revealed that female users spend more time in e-commerce and quick commerce platforms compared to males. Among users aged 18-24, female engagement is 47 per cent higher than that of their male counterparts.“Audience share measures the first. Time spent measures the second. In Urban India's highest time-spent categories, those two numbers point in different directions - and the direction of deeper engagement consistently belongs to female users,” the report read.According to the data, females consistently demonstrate higher levels of interaction across key digital categories, 42 per cent higher than males. Women aged 25-34 living in megacities spend an average of 35.2 minutes per day on e-commerce and quick commerce applications, compared to 24.8 minutes for men in the same age group.The gender-based engagement advantage is also reflected in platform-specific data. Quick commerce platform Blinkit has a female audience share of 57 per cent, while e-commerce platforms Meesho and Myntra report female user shares of 61 per cent and 54 per cent, respectively.&nbsp;“Any brief that targets ‘e-commerce shoppers’ without female-first planning is mis-aimed,” the report said. Meanwhile, messaging platforms continue to be a major part of daily digital life, with users spending an average of 58.6 minutes per day. The report also highlights the rapid growth of emerging categories. Loan and credit applications recorded a 30 per cent increase in monthly active users, while artificial intelligence applications registered growth exceeding 100 per cent, underlining the expanding influence of AI-powered tools in India’s digital ecosystem.

Urban Indians aged 18-24 spend over 120 minutes daily on social media, while women show significantly higher engagement in e-commerce and quick commerce, spending up to 47 per cent more time than men.

Amid rising use of social media across the world, a report highlighted that urban Indian young adults are spending more than 120 minutes on social media each day. According to a joint report by VTION and the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), urban Indian youth, aged between 18 and 24 years, are using social media significantly more than the overall social media average of 97.9 minutes daily. The report studied digital consumption patterns in urban India, which vary sharply across age groups and genders. It added that while social media is largely dominated by the younger users, the entertainment category is led by consumers aged 35 and above. The older demographic spends an average of 77.2 minutes per day on entertainment platforms, making it one of the highest-engagement digital categories. The report also revealed that female users spend more time in e-commerce and quick commerce platforms compared to males. Among users aged 18-24, female engagement is 47 per cent higher than that of their male counterparts. “Audience share measures the first. Time spent measures the second. In Urban India's highest time-spent categories, those two numbers point in different directions - and the direction of deeper engagement consistently belongs to female users,” the report read. According to the data, females consistently demonstrate higher levels of interaction across key digital categories, 42 per cent higher than males. Women aged 25-34 living in megacities spend an average of 35.2 minutes per day on e-commerce and quick commerce applications, compared to 24.8 minutes for men in the same age group. The gender-based engagement advantage is also reflected in platform-specific data. Quick commerce platform Blinkit has a female audience share of 57 per cent, while e-commerce platforms Meesho and Myntra report female user shares of 61 per cent and 54 per cent, respectively. “Any brief that targets ‘e-commerce shoppers’ without female-first planning is mis-aimed,” the report said. Meanwhile, messaging platforms continue to be a major part of daily digital life, with users spending an average of 58.6 minutes per day. The report also highlights the rapid growth of emerging categories. Loan and credit applications recorded a 30 per cent increase in monthly active users, while artificial intelligence applications registered growth exceeding 100 per cent, underlining the expanding influence of AI-powered tools in India’s digital ecosystem.

Urban Indians aged 18-24 spend over 120 minutes daily on social media, while women show significantly higher engagement in e-commerce and quick commerce, spending up to 47 per cent more time than men.

Youth spend over 120 minutes daily on social media; women dominate shopping apps: Inside India’s digital landscape

Governments across the world are stepping up efforts to regulate social media platforms amid rising concerns over child safety, online addiction, misinformation and data privacy. New laws and tougher digital rules are putting pressure on major tech companies to change how their platforms operate.

Countries Tighten Rules on Social Media Platforms 

Families in Italy are increasingly raising concerns over the impact of social media on minors, prompting calls for stricter limits and stronger digital safety measures. The debate focuses on screen addiction, online safety, mental health, and age-appropriate access to platforms as policymakers and parents push for greater regulation. The issue reflects a wider global conversation around children’s online exposure and social media responsibility.


Italy Social Media Risks: Families Seek to Limit Minors' Platform Use 

Roblox has announced new age-based accounts and expanded parental controls aimed at improving safety for users under 16. The changes are expected to roll out globally in June 2026. 


Roblox Introduces Age-Based Accounts in Indonesia

A shocking study claims that children as young as 13 are being exposed to explicit sexual content on X. Researchers found that even basic searches led to graphic material and the platform’s algorithm continued to push similar content into feeds. With regulators now stepping in, serious questions are being raised about whether social media platforms are doing enough to protect minors online.


Elon Musk's X Exposed In UK? Study Says 13-Year-Olds Are Shown Explicit Content

The Andhra Pradesh government set up a Social Media Monitoring Unit under the state police last year to scrutinise derogatory or offensive social media posts, and since then, more than 1,300 arrests have been made in connection with such cases, Director General of Police Harish Kumar Gupta said on Tuesday.


Andhra Pradesh: Social Media Monitoring Unit Scrutinises Online Content; Over 1300 Arrested

The UK government is considering a ban on social media access for children under 16 as part of a new initiative to protect young users from online risks. To test the policy, a six-week pilot program will involve 300 teenagers, monitoring how age restrictions could affect social media use, mental health, and online safety.

UK Considers Under-16 Social Media Ban; 300 Teens to Join Six-Week Pilot 

Social media platforms are built to capture attention, using powerful algorithms to keep users scrolling longer. Experts warn this “attention economy” model may be contributing to rising mental health concerns, including anxiety and low self-esteem. Studies suggest the constant need for engagement can make it harder to disconnect, raising fresh questions about how digital platforms shape behaviour and well-being.


How Social Media Algorithms Fuel Addiction And Impact Mental Health

France has taken a major step toward regulating online access for minors, as the upper house of parliament has cleared a social media ban law for teenagers with certain conditions. The move reflects growing concern over the impact of social media on young users.

Lawmakers say the restrictions aim to protect children from harmful content and excessive screen time, while also placing greater responsibility on tech platforms to enforce age limits. However, the conditional nature of the law suggests ongoing debate over how far such regulations should go.

French Parliament's Upper House Clears Social Media Ban Law for Teens With Conditions 

Nearly 70 per cent of Australian under-16s who had social media accounts before a landmark law banned it are still accessing them. The government is probing Meta, TikTok, Google, Snap and other tech firms over alleged failures to enforce the ban. The probe covers platforms like Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube.<h2>Australia's stringent law banning social media for teens</h2>The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act, in force since December, designates Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit and several other platforms as “age-restricted”, requiring them to prevent under-16s from holding accounts. Penalties of up to A$49.5 million, or US$33.9 million, could be imposed on companies for non-compliance.Under the law, the entire onus is on the platforms, as there is no penalty for children or parents if under-16s try to access social media using circumventions such as VPNs.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/in-a-global-first-australia-s-under-16-social-media-ban-takes-effect-1765286627973">In a global first, Australia’s under-16 social media ban takes effect</a><h2>Law enforcement is lax, reveals survey</h2>However, the new eSafety Compliance Report and Survey, based on compulsory information from platforms and interviews with nearly 900 parents, found that implementation is far from perfect.In the survey, 31 per cent of parents said their children still had at least one social media account after the ban. Among children who previously used Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok, about 70 per cent retained access. Platform-specific data showed similar trends, with 63.6 per cent of children keeping Facebook accounts, 69.1 per cent on Instagram, 69.4 per cent on Snapchat, 69.3 per cent on TikTok, and 48.5 per cent on YouTube.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-bans-under-16-social-media-accounts-millions-removed-within-days-1768537233396/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-bans-under-16-social-media-accounts-millions-removed-within-days-1768537233396/embed</a><h2>Tech firms doing bare minimum, says minister</h2>Australia’s communications minister, Anika Wells, said the companies were doing “the absolute bare minimum”, adding that “none of this is even difficult for big tech, who are innovative billion-dollar companies”.Calling the update unacceptable, she said firms must comply: “If these companies want to do business in Australia, they must obey Australian laws.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/australia-bans-under-16s-from-social-media-but-youtube-warns-it-could-make-them-less-safe-wion-explains-1764746581502">Australia bans under-16s from social media, but YouTube warns it could make them less safe. Here's how</a><h2>Australia's eSafety Commission blames weak enforcement</h2>The eSafety Commission of Australia said overall account ownership declined, but a substantial proportion of children under 16 retained social media accounts, attributing this partly to weak enforcement systems. “The most common reason children still had their social media accounts was that they had not yet been asked by the platform to verify their age,” it said.Some platforms allow repeated age-verification attempts and encourage underage users to try verification despite declaring an age below 16.<h2>‘Deliberate resistance’</h2>Technologies such as facial age estimation were deemed unreliable, especially near the age threshold, with concerns that some 14- and 15-year-olds could be classified as over 16.Wells argued such shortcomings reflected deliberate resistance, with companies attempting to “throw doubt on any regulation”.<h2>Meta says age verification is tough</h2>For its part, Meta said age verification is an industry-wide challenge, citing “natural error margins” at the 16-year limit. It instead advocated stronger controls at the level of app stores and operating systems, including parental approvals.According to the government, 4.7 million social media accounts were removed or restricted shortly after the ban. However, ongoing access by minors has raised doubts about the policy’s effectiveness.

Australia is probing Meta, TikTok, Google and others as most under-16s retain social media access despite a ban. Weak enforcement and ineffective age verification systems threaten to defeat implementation of the landmark law, in effect since December

Nearly 70 per cent of Australian under-16s who had social media accounts before a landmark law banned it are still accessing them. The government is probing Meta, TikTok, Google, Snap and other tech firms over alleged failures to enforce the ban. The probe covers platforms like Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube. Australia's stringent law banning social media for teens The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act, in force since December, designates Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit and several other platforms as “age-restricted”, requiring them to prevent under-16s from holding accounts. Penalties of up to A$49.5 million, or US$33.9 million, could be imposed on companies for non-compliance. Under the law, the entire onus is on the platforms, as there is no penalty for children or parents if under-16s try to access social media using circumventions such as VPNs. Also read: In a global first, Australia’s under-16 social media ban takes effect Law enforcement is lax, reveals survey However, the new eSafety Compliance Report and Survey, based on compulsory information from platforms and interviews with nearly 900 parents, found that implementation is far from perfect. In the survey, 31 per cent of parents said their children still had at least one social media account after the ban. Among children who previously used Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok, about 70 per cent retained access. Platform-specific data showed similar trends, with 63.6 per cent of children keeping Facebook accounts, 69.1 per cent on Instagram, 69.4 per cent on Snapchat, 69.3 per cent on TikTok, and 48.5 per cent on YouTube. https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-bans-under-16-social-media-accounts-millions-removed-within-days-1768537233396/embed Tech firms doing bare minimum, says minister Australia’s communications minister, Anika Wells, said the companies were doing “the absolute bare minimum”, adding that “none of this is even difficult for big tech, who are innovative billion-dollar companies”. Calling the update unacceptable, she said firms must comply: “If these companies want to do business in Australia, they must obey Australian laws.” Also read: Australia bans under-16s from social media, but YouTube warns it could make them less safe. Here's how Australia's eSafety Commission blames weak enforcement The eSafety Commission of Australia said overall account ownership declined, but a substantial proportion of children under 16 retained social media accounts, attributing this partly to weak enforcement systems. “The most common reason children still had their social media accounts was that they had not yet been asked by the platform to verify their age,” it said. Some platforms allow repeated age-verification attempts and encourage underage users to try verification despite declaring an age below 16. ‘Deliberate resistance’ Technologies such as facial age estimation were deemed unreliable, especially near the age threshold, with concerns that some 14- and 15-year-olds could be classified as over 16. Wells argued such shortcomings reflected deliberate resistance, with companies attempting to “throw doubt on any regulation”. Meta says age verification is tough For its part, Meta said age verification is an industry-wide challenge, citing “natural error margins” at the 16-year limit. It instead advocated stronger controls at the level of app stores and operating systems, including parental approvals. According to the government, 4.7 million social media accounts were removed or restricted shortly after the ban. However, ongoing access by minors has raised doubts about the policy’s effectiveness.