The Iran war has led to more casualties of the US troops than previously claimed by the Pentagon publicly. A report in the Washington Post that cites six US officials familiar with the Defense Department’s internal casualty accounting data, has put the number at 22, four ​more than were listed in the data available on the Pentagon's public database.&nbsp;However, another official said that not all of the undisclosed fatalities were directly linked to the fighting but happened during the military personnel deputation to the Middle East during the conflict.&nbsp;The official added that three US contractors in the region have also been killed since the start of the war.&nbsp;Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ​has denied the report and called it "a complete LIE."Taking to X Hegseth wrote, “This is DISGUSTING and FAKE. A complete LIE."&nbsp;He further criticised the newspaper saying, “Shame on the Washington Post — they’re worse than Iranian state media.”&nbsp;The report did not provide more details into how and when the deaths happened. It also did not reveal the identities of those "killed".&nbsp;<h2>Shortfall of munitions</h2>&nbsp;Other than human casualties, the US is also facing munition shortfall. On Spetember 14, the inspector general of the Defense Department of the United States in its report had said that the conflict with Iran has led to a shortfall of US munitions and “bottlenecks” in supply chains and that Washington is working to replenish weaponry.&nbsp;“Pentagon is working to streamline procurement processes and production lead times, and to stockpile critical materials, components, and selected munitions to respond rapidly to a contingency,” said the report.&nbsp;According to experts, it is going to take US three years to replenish advanced missiles and defensive missile interceptors to prewar levels, say experts, reported Reuters. &nbsp;

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ​has denied the report saying, “This is DISGUSTING and FAKE. A complete LIE."

The Iran war has led to more casualties of the US troops than previously claimed by the Pentagon publicly. A report in the Washington Post that cites six US officials familiar with the Defense Department’s internal casualty accounting data, has put the number at 22, four more than were listed in the data available on the Pentagon's public database. However, another official said that not all of the undisclosed fatalities were directly linked to the fighting but happened during the military personnel deputation to the Middle East during the conflict. The official added that three US contractors in the region have also been killed since the start of the war. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has denied the report and called it "a complete LIE." Taking to X Hegseth wrote, “This is DISGUSTING and FAKE. A complete LIE." He further criticised the newspaper saying, “Shame on the Washington Post — they’re worse than Iranian state media.” The report did not provide more details into how and when the deaths happened. It also did not reveal the identities of those "killed". Shortfall of munitions Other than human casualties, the US is also facing munition shortfall. On Spetember 14, the inspector general of the Defense Department of the United States in its report had said that the conflict with Iran has led to a shortfall of US munitions and “bottlenecks” in supply chains and that Washington is working to replenish weaponry. “Pentagon is working to streamline procurement processes and production lead times, and to stockpile critical materials, components, and selected munitions to respond rapidly to a contingency,” said the report. According to experts, it is going to take US three years to replenish advanced missiles and defensive missile interceptors to prewar levels, say experts, reported Reuters.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ​has denied the report saying, “This is DISGUSTING and FAKE. A complete LIE."

US hiding troop deaths in Iran war? Toll higher than Pentagon count, claims report

The Pentagon is bringing back mandatory testing for testosterone deficiency among US service members aged 30 and above, reviving a programme that medical experts have criticised as unnecessary and potentially harmful.&nbsp;The new clinical guidance applies only to male service members and sets common procedures for screening and treating testosterone deficiency. The Pentagon said it will issue separate guidance for female service members at a later stage.&nbsp;The new rules require testosterone tests during periodic health assessments and annual physical examinations. Service members below the age of 30 can also undergo testing if they request it or if doctors believe it is medically necessary.&nbsp;“Effective immediately, this guidance addresses male testosterone deficiency, establishing uniform screening and treatment pathways,” Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement.<h3>Hegseth first announced testing plan</h3>US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth first announced the mandatory screening plan in July as he promoted testosterone use as a way to improve military readiness.&nbsp;Under the earlier guidance, women were also expected to undergo screening through a questionnaire, after which they could potentially receive treatment for conditions linked to hormonal imbalances.&nbsp;The latest guidance, however, makes clear that the mandatory testing programme currently covers only male service members. Hegseth’s July memo had called for testosterone deficiency screening for all troops, but the clinical guidance issued on Thursday specifically refers to “testosterone deficiency in the male service member”.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/drone-strikes-cooling-tower-at-russia-s-kursk-nuclear-plant-iaea-confirms-1789755853264">Drone strikes cooling tower at Russia's Kursk Nuclear Plant, IAEA confirms</a><h3>Growing interest in testosterone</h3>The Pentagon’s move comes as interest in testosterone has increased, particularly among men’s health influencers and podcasters who often promote the hormone as a way to increase energy, build muscle and make people feel younger.&nbsp;Medical experts, however, have questioned some of these wider claims, saying they are not supported by scientific evidence. Hegseth’s public messaging on testosterone has also combined established scientific information with broader claims that have less evidence behind them.&nbsp;The new guidance therefore establishes a specific screening and treatment process for male service members while leaving separate rules for female troops to be issued later.

The Pentagon has reinstated mandatory testosterone deficiency testing for male US service members aged 30 and above, with separate screening guidelines for female troops to be issued later.

The Pentagon is bringing back mandatory testing for testosterone deficiency among US service members aged 30 and above, reviving a programme that medical experts have criticised as unnecessary and potentially harmful. The new clinical guidance applies only to male service members and sets common procedures for screening and treating testosterone deficiency. The Pentagon said it will issue separate guidance for female service members at a later stage. The new rules require testosterone tests during periodic health assessments and annual physical examinations. Service members below the age of 30 can also undergo testing if they request it or if doctors believe it is medically necessary. “Effective immediately, this guidance addresses male testosterone deficiency, establishing uniform screening and treatment pathways,” Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement. Hegseth first announced testing plan US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth first announced the mandatory screening plan in July as he promoted testosterone use as a way to improve military readiness. Under the earlier guidance, women were also expected to undergo screening through a questionnaire, after which they could potentially receive treatment for conditions linked to hormonal imbalances. The latest guidance, however, makes clear that the mandatory testing programme currently covers only male service members. Hegseth’s July memo had called for testosterone deficiency screening for all troops, but the clinical guidance issued on Thursday specifically refers to “testosterone deficiency in the male service member”. Also Read: Drone strikes cooling tower at Russia's Kursk Nuclear Plant, IAEA confirms Growing interest in testosterone The Pentagon’s move comes as interest in testosterone has increased, particularly among men’s health influencers and podcasters who often promote the hormone as a way to increase energy, build muscle and make people feel younger. Medical experts, however, have questioned some of these wider claims, saying they are not supported by scientific evidence. Hegseth’s public messaging on testosterone has also combined established scientific information with broader claims that have less evidence behind them. The new guidance therefore establishes a specific screening and treatment process for male service members while leaving separate rules for female troops to be issued later.

The Pentagon has reinstated mandatory testosterone deficiency testing for male US service members aged 30 and above, with separate screening guidelines for female troops to be issued later.

Pentagon revives mandatory testosterone testing for male troops aged 30 and above

In a dramatic move on Capitol Hill, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie has introduced articles of impeachment against U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Massie accuses Hegseth of violating the War Powers Resolution by continuing military operations in Iran without congressional authorization. The effort is considered a long shot, but it highlights growing divisions within Republican ranks over U.S. military actions and executive war powers. The Pentagon has defended Hegseth's leadership and rejected the allegations.


Republican Congressman Thomas Massie moves to remove US war secretary Pete Hegseth 

The Pentagon is asking military commanders to nominate servicemembers to attend Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “State of the Force” address on September 30, with candidates required to meet specific physical and grooming standards. According to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, nominees must meet the Army’s waist-to-height requirements, pass fitness tests and maintain “impeccable” grooming and uniform standards.&nbsp;Selected servicemembers will also have an opportunity to work out with Hegseth. Candidates will be chosen based on “demonstrated leadership quality and professional character,” according to the messages sent to military commanders. The planned event comes about a year after Hegseth ordered the nation’s senior generals and admirals to gather at Marine Corps Base Quantico for an address in which he declared “no more beardos” or “fat generals.”&nbsp;Since taking over as Pentagon chief last year, Hegseth has placed a strong emphasis on physical fitness and appearance across the armed forces. He has argued that maintaining rigorous physical standards is essential to ensuring the military can effectively fight wars. Critics have questioned the emphasis, arguing that Hegseth’s focus is too narrow and warning that military personnel should not be used to advance the administration’s political priorities.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-threatens-to-keep-kennedy-center-closed-after-judge-blocks-his-name-from-iconic-memorial-s-facade-1789538127990">Trump threatens to keep Kennedy Center closed after judge blocks his name from iconic memorial's facade</a><h2>Lower-ranking troops to attend</h2>Unlike last year’s gathering, which brought together senior military leadership, this year’s audience is expected to include lower-ranking officers and enlisted servicemembers, officials said. The Wall Street Journal previously reported that Hegseth was considering holding the event again. An email dated Tuesday and sent to Army commanders said the Pentagon was seeking servicemembers who meet specific “physical standards.” Candidates must pass the Army’s waist-to-height ratio requirements and fitness tests while maintaining “impeccable grooming and uniform standards (no exception).”&nbsp;The selection criteria also require nominees to be “consistently rated as top performers within their formations,” have a “clear record of integrity, discipline and selfless service,” “demonstrate strong presence, clear communication and sound judgment under pressure,” and “serve as role models for their peers and subordinates.” Officials said other military commands received similar versions of the message. A Pentagon official declined to comment.<h2>Hegseth's focus on the ‘warrior ethos’</h2>Hegseth’s decision last fall to convene the country’s generals and admirals at Quantico surprised some senior military officers. According to the report, officers only later learned that the meeting would focus on enforcing the “warrior ethos.” During the event, Hegseth outlined his priorities, including rejecting policies from the previous administration that he has described as “woke” and placing a renewed emphasis on “warfighting” as the Pentagon’s primary mission.&nbsp;“For too long, we have simply not done that. The military has been forced by foolish and reckless politicians to focus on the wrong things,” Hegseth said. “In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden.”The upcoming September 30 address is expected to continue Hegseth’s emphasis on military readiness, physical standards and professional conduct across the armed forces.

Pentagon seeks troops for Pete Hegseth’s September 30 'State of the Force' speech, requiring fitness tests, waist-to-height standards and strict grooming

The Pentagon is asking military commanders to nominate servicemembers to attend Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “State of the Force” address on September 30, with candidates required to meet specific physical and grooming standards. According to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, nominees must meet the Army’s waist-to-height requirements, pass fitness tests and maintain “impeccable” grooming and uniform standards. Selected servicemembers will also have an opportunity to work out with Hegseth. Candidates will be chosen based on “demonstrated leadership quality and professional character,” according to the messages sent to military commanders. The planned event comes about a year after Hegseth ordered the nation’s senior generals and admirals to gather at Marine Corps Base Quantico for an address in which he declared “no more beardos” or “fat generals.” Since taking over as Pentagon chief last year, Hegseth has placed a strong emphasis on physical fitness and appearance across the armed forces. He has argued that maintaining rigorous physical standards is essential to ensuring the military can effectively fight wars. Critics have questioned the emphasis, arguing that Hegseth’s focus is too narrow and warning that military personnel should not be used to advance the administration’s political priorities. Also Read: Trump threatens to keep Kennedy Center closed after judge blocks his name from iconic memorial's facade Lower-ranking troops to attend Unlike last year’s gathering, which brought together senior military leadership, this year’s audience is expected to include lower-ranking officers and enlisted servicemembers, officials said. The Wall Street Journal previously reported that Hegseth was considering holding the event again. An email dated Tuesday and sent to Army commanders said the Pentagon was seeking servicemembers who meet specific “physical standards.” Candidates must pass the Army’s waist-to-height ratio requirements and fitness tests while maintaining “impeccable grooming and uniform standards (no exception).” The selection criteria also require nominees to be “consistently rated as top performers within their formations,” have a “clear record of integrity, discipline and selfless service,” “demonstrate strong presence, clear communication and sound judgment under pressure,” and “serve as role models for their peers and subordinates.” Officials said other military commands received similar versions of the message. A Pentagon official declined to comment. Hegseth's focus on the ‘warrior ethos’ Hegseth’s decision last fall to convene the country’s generals and admirals at Quantico surprised some senior military officers. According to the report, officers only later learned that the meeting would focus on enforcing the “warrior ethos.” During the event, Hegseth outlined his priorities, including rejecting policies from the previous administration that he has described as “woke” and placing a renewed emphasis on “warfighting” as the Pentagon’s primary mission. “For too long, we have simply not done that. The military has been forced by foolish and reckless politicians to focus on the wrong things,” Hegseth said. “In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden.” The upcoming September 30 address is expected to continue Hegseth’s emphasis on military readiness, physical standards and professional conduct across the armed forces.

The Pentagon seeks troops for Pet Hegseth’s September 30 speech, requiring fitness, waist-to-height compliance, leadership records and strict grooming standards

Fit and impeccable? Pentagon sets standards for Hegseth's 'State of the Force' speech attendees

It is midterm election season in the US, and President Donald Trump has't got much to show for victory in Iran war. Reports, including in Wall Street Journal, suggest that he is weighing whether to declare the Iran war over. Trump administration has meanwhile officially asked for ending the usage of the term ‘Operation Epic Fury’, which started the war on February 28. Trump's Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is planning US troops extension in the Middle East into 2027, and the Pentagon appears to be readying for a prolonged US military presence in the Gulf. Is there a gap between the thinking of the president and Hegseth on the course of the war?<h2>Operation Fury naming officially ends</h2>The Pentagon has said months ago that Operation Epic Fury officially ended on May 5. &nbsp;An August 7 Air Force email obtained by CBS News instructed military leaders to stop using the name in Iran operations, which still continued with occasional strikes from the US Central Command targeting Iranian assets. The letter told the services to use the term "overseas operations in the US Central Command Area of Responsibility." This guidance from Hegseth's public affairs office was disseminated across the Defence Department, according to officials cited by CBS News.Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said on May 5 itself that Operation Epic Fury is over.&nbsp;"The president notified Congress…we're done with that stage of it. We're now on to this Project Freedom," he had said at the time.Hegseth separately described Project Freedom as a defensive maritime mission protecting commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-targets-us-bases-in-jordan-bahrain-kuwait-erbil-1788372289618/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-targets-us-bases-in-jordan-bahrain-kuwait-erbil-1788372289618/embed</a><h2>What's in a name? The broader conflict has not ended and Pentagon is preparing for longer war</h2>Whatever name the US gives it, the reality is that the conflict is far from over. Trump notified Congress on July 7 that "military action" against Iran had restarted after talks collapsed and the April ceasefire ended. Since then, US and Iranian forces have continued exchanging fire up to this week.The WSJ report said that Hegseth is extending troop deployments into 2027. The Pentagon is maintaining about 50,000 troops and 19 warships in the region. This includes two aircraft carriers and 13 guided-missile destroyers.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/rubio-on-modi-pezeshkian-meeting-no-country-should-help-iran-evade-sanctions-1788406366516">Rubio on Modi-Pezeshkian meeting: 'No country should help Iran evade sanctions'</a>&nbsp;These military assets are engaged in intercepting Iranian missiles, protecting commercial shipping across Hormuz, and blockading Iranian ports. US forces remain ready for larger strikes.Army air-defence deployments reportedly shifted from nine to 12 months.The USS Gerald R Ford spent 11 months at sea before returning in May, while the USS Theodore Roosevelt is preparing for a longer-than-normal deployment.&nbsp;The WSJ reported that elements of the Army's 82nd Airborne Division could remain in the Middle East well into 2027. It quoted Bryan Clark, a former senior Navy official, as saying: "They're setting it up to be sustained over the long haul, meaning well into next year."<h2>As midterms loom, Trump has an Iran war exit dilemma</h2>US officials told the WSJ that Trump is privately discussing with aides whether to declare the war over. Trump favours economic pressure on Iran, which he beilives can force the Islamic Republic to dismantle its nuclear programme."I like our position now much better, with almost total control of the Hormuz Strait, and their economy totally collapsing. They are just playing out the inevitable. When are the Iranian people going to rise up and fight?," Trump recently wrote on Truth Social.Some of his aides &nbsp;warned that further escalation could damage Republican prospects in the November midterm elections. Trump maintains he doesn't care about the midterms, and that the poll prospects are not influencing his decisions. The strain is already visible, even as he inisists that the US forces remain ready to strike "any time we want".Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-launches-retaliatory-strikes-with-missiles-and-drones-iranian-media-1788294861231">Iran launches retaliatory strikes with missiles and drones; Trump warns of ‘much harder’ attack</a>&nbsp;According to Tom Karako of the Center for Strategic and International Studies , a further extension of air-defence deployments could wea out troops, delay maintenance and hamper longer-term modernisation.&nbsp;But a recent military letter to families of servicemen said "a longer tour weighs heavily on every household, including our own."What are these mixed signals telling us? Trump may be looking for a political and diplomatic exit from the Iran war. But Hegseth's Pentagon is positioning US forces for a conflict that could last well into 2027. At this time, both are looking for a fig leaf, a headline that they can take to Americans and the world, to claim victory against Iran.

A report claimed that Trump is weighing to end the Iran war. A military letter has asked for not using the term ‘Operation Epic Fury’ for US operations in the Gulf. But US troop deployments are being extended into 2027. Midterm concerns, economic pressure, or mixed signals?

It is midterm election season in the US, and President Donald Trump has't got much to show for victory in Iran war. Reports, including in Wall Street Journal, suggest that he is weighing whether to declare the Iran war over. Trump administration has meanwhile officially asked for ending the usage of the term ‘Operation Epic Fury’, which started the war on February 28. Trump's Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is planning US troops extension in the Middle East into 2027, and the Pentagon appears to be readying for a prolonged US military presence in the Gulf. Is there a gap between the thinking of the president and Hegseth on the course of the war? Operation Fury naming officially ends The Pentagon has said months ago that Operation Epic Fury officially ended on May 5. An August 7 Air Force email obtained by CBS News instructed military leaders to stop using the name in Iran operations, which still continued with occasional strikes from the US Central Command targeting Iranian assets. The letter told the services to use the term "overseas operations in the US Central Command Area of Responsibility." This guidance from Hegseth's public affairs office was disseminated across the Defence Department, according to officials cited by CBS News. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said on May 5 itself that Operation Epic Fury is over. "The president notified Congress…we're done with that stage of it. We're now on to this Project Freedom," he had said at the time. Hegseth separately described Project Freedom as a defensive maritime mission protecting commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-targets-us-bases-in-jordan-bahrain-kuwait-erbil-1788372289618/embed What's in a name? The broader conflict has not ended and Pentagon is preparing for longer war Whatever name the US gives it, the reality is that the conflict is far from over. Trump notified Congress on July 7 that "military action" against Iran had restarted after talks collapsed and the April ceasefire ended. Since then, US and Iranian forces have continued exchanging fire up to this week. The WSJ report said that Hegseth is extending troop deployments into 2027. The Pentagon is maintaining about 50,000 troops and 19 warships in the region. This includes two aircraft carriers and 13 guided-missile destroyers. Also read: Rubio on Modi-Pezeshkian meeting: 'No country should help Iran evade sanctions' These military assets are engaged in intercepting Iranian missiles, protecting commercial shipping across Hormuz, and blockading Iranian ports. US forces remain ready for larger strikes. Army air-defence deployments reportedly shifted from nine to 12 months. The USS Gerald R Ford spent 11 months at sea before returning in May, while the USS Theodore Roosevelt is preparing for a longer-than-normal deployment. The WSJ reported that elements of the Army's 82nd Airborne Division could remain in the Middle East well into 2027. It quoted Bryan Clark, a former senior Navy official, as saying: "They're setting it up to be sustained over the long haul, meaning well into next year." As midterms loom, Trump has an Iran war exit dilemma US officials told the WSJ that Trump is privately discussing with aides whether to declare the war over. Trump favours economic pressure on Iran, which he beilives can force the Islamic Republic to dismantle its nuclear programme. "I like our position now much better, with almost total control of the Hormuz Strait, and their economy totally collapsing. They are just playing out the inevitable. When are the Iranian people going to rise up and fight?," Trump recently wrote on Truth Social. Some of his aides warned that further escalation could damage Republican prospects in the November midterm elections. Trump maintains he doesn't care about the midterms, and that the poll prospects are not influencing his decisions. The strain is already visible, even as he inisists that the US forces remain ready to strike "any time we want". Also read: Iran launches retaliatory strikes with missiles and drones; Trump warns of ‘much harder’ attack According to Tom Karako of the Center for Strategic and International Studies , a further extension of air-defence deployments could wea out troops, delay maintenance and hamper longer-term modernisation. But a recent military letter to families of servicemen said "a longer tour weighs heavily on every household, including our own." What are these mixed signals telling us? Trump may be looking for a political and diplomatic exit from the Iran war. But Hegseth's Pentagon is positioning US forces for a conflict that could last well into 2027. At this time, both are looking for a fig leaf, a headline that they can take to Americans and the world, to claim victory against Iran.

A report hinted that Trump is weighing to end the Iran war. A military letter has asked for not using the term ‘Operation Epic Fury’ for US operations in the Gulf. But US troop deployments are being extended into 2027. Midterm concerns, economic pressure, or mixed signals?

Is Trump ending Iran war? 'Operation Fury' naming ends, Hegseth extends troop plan to 2027 as prez appears tired ahead of midterms

Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a former member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, is urging President Trump to remove Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, sharply criticising his leadership of the Pentagon. Tillis intensified his criticism following Army Secretary Dan Driscoll’s resignation, which came after repeated disagreements with Hegseth over the removal of senior military officials, including Gen. Randy George, the former Army chief of staff.&nbsp;Tillis praised Driscoll’s tenure, describing him as “the right man at the right moment to lead our Soldiers and Army civilians,” while expressing frustration over what he sees as Hegseth’s mishandling of the Defense Department. “I have never witnessed more inept management of the brave men and women who serve our country. He is intimidated by competence and retreats to ginning up culture wars instead of soberly attending to the vital work of our national defense and the health and well-being of our fighting force,” Tillis posted on social platform X.&nbsp;Tillis’ criticism is particularly notable because he cast a pivotal vote last year in support of Hegseth’s confirmation as defense secretary. He is now asking Trump to select a new Pentagon chief. “I urge the president to find a new leader at the Pentagon who will retain and empower our military talent rather than diminish it,” Tillis said. The North Carolina Republican also accused Hegseth of weakening the military’s senior leadership by removing or pushing out a series of high-ranking officials.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/rubio-on-modi-pezeshkian-meeting-no-country-should-help-iran-evade-sanctions-1788406366516">Rubio on Modi-Pezeshkian meeting: 'No country should help Iran evade sanctions'</a>&nbsp;Among those officials are Gen. Chris Donahue, the top U.S. Army commander in Europe; former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. CQ Brown Jr.; Adm. Lisa Franchetti, the Navy’s top officer; Gen. David Allvin, Air Force chief of staff; and Gen. James Mingus, Army vice chief of staff. Tillis also highlighted Driscoll’s work with George on the Army Transformation Initiative, which aimed to accelerate the deployment and integration of unmanned aircraft systems into Army operations.&nbsp;“Our understanding and assumptions of warfare are being challenged in places like Ukraine and Iran, and Dan understands the old way of doing business no longer applies. He and General George began a transformative period of innovation in how we array our forces and equip our Soldiers. He challenged our legacy approach to manning and procurement,” Tillis wrote. “Most of all, he cared deeply about the men and women in our Army formations and quickly earned their respect,” the North Carolina senator added of Driscoll.

Sen. Thom Tillis urges President Trump to fire Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, criticizing his Pentagon leadership after Dan Driscoll’s resignation

Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a former member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, is urging President Trump to remove Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, sharply criticising his leadership of the Pentagon. Tillis intensified his criticism following Army Secretary Dan Driscoll’s resignation, which came after repeated disagreements with Hegseth over the removal of senior military officials, including Gen. Randy George, the former Army chief of staff. Tillis praised Driscoll’s tenure, describing him as “the right man at the right moment to lead our Soldiers and Army civilians,” while expressing frustration over what he sees as Hegseth’s mishandling of the Defense Department. “I have never witnessed more inept management of the brave men and women who serve our country. He is intimidated by competence and retreats to ginning up culture wars instead of soberly attending to the vital work of our national defense and the health and well-being of our fighting force,” Tillis posted on social platform X. Tillis’ criticism is particularly notable because he cast a pivotal vote last year in support of Hegseth’s confirmation as defense secretary. He is now asking Trump to select a new Pentagon chief. “I urge the president to find a new leader at the Pentagon who will retain and empower our military talent rather than diminish it,” Tillis said. The North Carolina Republican also accused Hegseth of weakening the military’s senior leadership by removing or pushing out a series of high-ranking officials. Also Read: Rubio on Modi-Pezeshkian meeting: 'No country should help Iran evade sanctions' Among those officials are Gen. Chris Donahue, the top U.S. Army commander in Europe; former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. CQ Brown Jr.; Adm. Lisa Franchetti, the Navy’s top officer; Gen. David Allvin, Air Force chief of staff; and Gen. James Mingus, Army vice chief of staff. Tillis also highlighted Driscoll’s work with George on the Army Transformation Initiative, which aimed to accelerate the deployment and integration of unmanned aircraft systems into Army operations. “Our understanding and assumptions of warfare are being challenged in places like Ukraine and Iran, and Dan understands the old way of doing business no longer applies. He and General George began a transformative period of innovation in how we array our forces and equip our Soldiers. He challenged our legacy approach to manning and procurement,” Tillis wrote. “Most of all, he cared deeply about the men and women in our Army formations and quickly earned their respect,” the North Carolina senator added of Driscoll.

Senator Thom Tillis urges Trump to fire Pete Hegseth, accusing him of inept Pentagon management after Army Secretary Dan Driscoll’s resignation

Republican Senator Thom Tillis calls on Trump to fire Pete Hegseth over his 'inept management' of military

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Aug 2 appeared to mock the appearance of a uniformed woman featured in a Canadian cadet post, sharing her image on X with a Canadian flag and the words: “(this is real).” The image, originally posted by the cadets showed the woman in Canadian military camouflage standing alongside another person in cadet attire. Hegseth did give any explanation of his comment. However, the post was interpreted as a weight-related jibe given his repeated use of the phrase “fit not fat”as Hegseth is known for pushing tougher physical standards in the US military.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/short-videos/why-did-us-army-secretary-quit-from-pete-hegseth-s-team-1788286821361">Why did US army secretary quit from Pete Hegseth's team?</a>&nbsp;At the US Army War College in April 2025, Hegseth told military leaders they needed to be “fit not fat, sharp not shabby” while discussing a force-wide review of fitness, training and physical standards. His language became more pointed at a gathering of senior US military commanders at Quantico in September 2025. “It’s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon,” Hegseth said while laying out stricter fitness and appearance standards. In the same speech, he also complained about seeing “fat troops” in military formations. The Pentagon subsequently issued new guidance on physical fitness and grooming standards. &nbsp;In February, Hegseth praised the US Army on X by writing: “Well done @USArmy. Merit-based &amp; Fit NOT Fat.” At West Point in May, he told graduating cadets: “You're fit, not fat. You are disciplined, not distracted.”&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-admin-hit-by-another-top-level-exit-as-us-army-secretary-dan-driscoll-resigns-1788227779264">Trump admin hit by another top-level exit as US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll</a>&nbsp;This comes amid trade war between Canada and the US. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney urged the Trump administration to take a more serious approach to trade negotiations, telling Washington to ‘stop doing memes, stop throwing shade and stop trying to be tough’ following another round of public attacks against Canada. Carney said trade talks could resume if US President Donald Trump and his administration approach negotiations seriously. However, he warned that some of Washington's demands could leave Canadian industries ‘gradually wound down in Canada and wiped out’. &nbsp;

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth sparked controversy after sharing an image of a Canadian cadet with the words “this is real”, amid his repeated push for tougher military fitness standards. The post comes as US-Canada tensions rise over trade, tariffs and Canadian sovereignty.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Aug 2 appeared to mock the appearance of a uniformed woman featured in a Canadian cadet post, sharing her image on X with a Canadian flag and the words: “(this is real).” The image, originally posted by the cadets showed the woman in Canadian military camouflage standing alongside another person in cadet attire. Hegseth did give any explanation of his comment. However, the post was interpreted as a weight-related jibe given his repeated use of the phrase “fit not fat”as Hegseth is known for pushing tougher physical standards in the US military. Also Read: Why did US army secretary quit from Pete Hegseth's team? At the US Army War College in April 2025, Hegseth told military leaders they needed to be “fit not fat, sharp not shabby” while discussing a force-wide review of fitness, training and physical standards. His language became more pointed at a gathering of senior US military commanders at Quantico in September 2025. “It’s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon,” Hegseth said while laying out stricter fitness and appearance standards. In the same speech, he also complained about seeing “fat troops” in military formations. The Pentagon subsequently issued new guidance on physical fitness and grooming standards. In February, Hegseth praised the US Army on X by writing: “Well done @USArmy. Merit-based & Fit NOT Fat.” At West Point in May, he told graduating cadets: “You're fit, not fat. You are disciplined, not distracted.” Also Read: Trump admin hit by another top-level exit as US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll This comes amid trade war between Canada and the US. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney urged the Trump administration to take a more serious approach to trade negotiations, telling Washington to ‘stop doing memes, stop throwing shade and stop trying to be tough’ following another round of public attacks against Canada. Carney said trade talks could resume if US President Donald Trump and his administration approach negotiations seriously. However, he warned that some of Washington's demands could leave Canadian industries ‘gradually wound down in Canada and wiped out’.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth sparked controversy after sharing an image of a Canadian cadet with the words “this is real”, amid his repeated push for tougher military fitness standards. The post comes as US-Canada tensions rise over trade, tariffs and Canadian sovereignty.

‘This is real’: Hegseth’s post on Canadian military woman sparks controversy

US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll steps down by the end of the year after months of tensions with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

US army secretary Dan Driscoll resigns from White House 

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is considering bringing hundreds of senior military personnel back to Marine Corps Base Quantico later this year for another major address, according to US officials. The potential gathering would come nearly a year after Hegseth ordered the country’s generals and admirals to assemble at Quantico on short notice. The unusual meeting, held last September without an initial explanation, surprised senior military officers and generated concern within the ranks.&nbsp;Hegseth used that event to outline his priorities for the Pentagon, including a rejection of policies from the previous administration that he characterizes as ‘woke’. He also stressed that the military should refocus on what he describes as its central mission: warfighting. “For too long, we have simply not done that. The military has been forced by foolish and reckless politicians to focus on the wrong things,” Hegseth said. “In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden.”&nbsp;Hegseth is expected to use the same venue again to present his priorities, according to the officials. One official said the defense secretary could also announce a new set of directives for the armed forces. The exact date of the proposed gathering has not been determined, and it remains unclear whether every serving general and admiral would be required to attend. “We have nothing to announce at this time,” said Pentagon spokesman Joel Valdez.&nbsp;Since taking over as Pentagon chief last year, Hegseth has sought to reverse diversity and inclusion initiatives associated with the previous administration. He has argued that such policies undermined military standards and has advocated for a culture placing greater emphasis on physical fitness and military readiness rather than what he calls “wokeness.” His approach has drawn criticism from military experts and former officials, who argue that Hegseth is pushing the armed services in an increasingly partisan direction.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/x-uncovers-suspected-chinese-bot-farm-targeting-us-ai-and-data-center-debate-1787986800724">X exposes suspected Chinese influence campaign over AI, energy and data centers</a>&nbsp;The response from military officers at last year’s event was notably restrained. Hegseth and President Trump, who opened the gathering, received a polite but muted reaction, with officers largely remaining stone-faced during the presentations. Strict military regulations prohibit personnel from engaging in or encouraging political activity, a factor that shaped the atmosphere during the event. Trump used his lengthy address to defend the administration’s deployment of military forces to police American cities while also warning that further action could follow.&nbsp;“What they’ve done to San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, they’re very unsafe places, and we’re going to straighten them out one by one,” Trump said. “And this is going to be a major part for some of the people in this room. That’s a war too. It’s a war from within.” It remains uncertain whether Trump will attend a potential second gathering at Quantico. During his address last year, Hegseth placed particular emphasis on military standards, saying service members would be evaluated on their physical fitness and appearance.&nbsp;“The era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Hegseth said. “No more beardos.” At the same time, the Pentagon released 11 memorandums detailing the administration’s priorities for the department. The measures included changes to fitness and grooming requirements. “When it comes to any job that requires physical power to perform in combat, those physical standards must be high and gender-neutral,” Hegseth said. “If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it.”

Pete Hegseth may gather hundreds of senior military leaders at Quantico again to outline Pentagon priorities, new directives, military standards and policies

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is considering bringing hundreds of senior military personnel back to Marine Corps Base Quantico later this year for another major address, according to US officials. The potential gathering would come nearly a year after Hegseth ordered the country’s generals and admirals to assemble at Quantico on short notice. The unusual meeting, held last September without an initial explanation, surprised senior military officers and generated concern within the ranks. Hegseth used that event to outline his priorities for the Pentagon, including a rejection of policies from the previous administration that he characterizes as ‘woke’. He also stressed that the military should refocus on what he describes as its central mission: warfighting. “For too long, we have simply not done that. The military has been forced by foolish and reckless politicians to focus on the wrong things,” Hegseth said. “In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden.” Hegseth is expected to use the same venue again to present his priorities, according to the officials. One official said the defense secretary could also announce a new set of directives for the armed forces. The exact date of the proposed gathering has not been determined, and it remains unclear whether every serving general and admiral would be required to attend. “We have nothing to announce at this time,” said Pentagon spokesman Joel Valdez. Since taking over as Pentagon chief last year, Hegseth has sought to reverse diversity and inclusion initiatives associated with the previous administration. He has argued that such policies undermined military standards and has advocated for a culture placing greater emphasis on physical fitness and military readiness rather than what he calls “wokeness.” His approach has drawn criticism from military experts and former officials, who argue that Hegseth is pushing the armed services in an increasingly partisan direction. Also Read: X exposes suspected Chinese influence campaign over AI, energy and data centers The response from military officers at last year’s event was notably restrained. Hegseth and President Trump, who opened the gathering, received a polite but muted reaction, with officers largely remaining stone-faced during the presentations. Strict military regulations prohibit personnel from engaging in or encouraging political activity, a factor that shaped the atmosphere during the event. Trump used his lengthy address to defend the administration’s deployment of military forces to police American cities while also warning that further action could follow. “What they’ve done to San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, they’re very unsafe places, and we’re going to straighten them out one by one,” Trump said. “And this is going to be a major part for some of the people in this room. That’s a war too. It’s a war from within.” It remains uncertain whether Trump will attend a potential second gathering at Quantico. During his address last year, Hegseth placed particular emphasis on military standards, saying service members would be evaluated on their physical fitness and appearance. “The era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Hegseth said. “No more beardos.” At the same time, the Pentagon released 11 memorandums detailing the administration’s priorities for the department. The measures included changes to fitness and grooming requirements. “When it comes to any job that requires physical power to perform in combat, those physical standards must be high and gender-neutral,” Hegseth said. “If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it.”

As per report, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth may bring hundreds of senior military leaders to Quantico again to outline Pentagon priorities and issue new directives

Pete Hegseth may gather top military leaders again at Quantico? Here’s what report says

US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll is expected to leave his position by the end of the year amid growing tensions with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal. Driscoll's possible departure would create another leadership gap at the top of the US Army, which has already been without a Senate-confirmed chief since Hegseth removed Army Chief of Staff General Randy George in April.&nbsp;Hegseth dismissed George without publicly giving a reason and has not yet nominated a permanent successor. General Christopher LaNeve, the Army's vice chief of staff and a former senior military aide to Hegseth, is currently serving as acting Army chief of staff. According to the report, Driscoll and his family moved out of the official family residence at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall this summer. His family has relocated to North Carolina, while Driscoll is now living in a smaller apartment on the military installation.<h2>Driscoll's relationship with Hegseth strained</h2>A former Army Ranger and long-time friend of Vice President JD Vance, Driscoll reportedly came under Hegseth's scrutiny early in the Trump administration. The tensions emerged after Driscoll attempted to arrange a visit for Vance and President Donald Trump to meet soldiers and discuss proposed reforms to the Army.&nbsp;Despite the strained relationship with Hegseth, Driscoll developed a strong partnership with George during his approximately 18 months as Army secretary. The two pushed the Army to adopt emerging technologies and argued that commercially developed innovations could have a major impact on the future of warfare. Driscoll also travelled to Ukraine alongside George and General Chris Donahue, who was then the Army's senior general in Europe. During the visit, Driscoll met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and discussed peace negotiations.&nbsp;He encouraged the Army to draw lessons from the war in Ukraine, particularly regarding the use of commercially available technology on the battlefield. During Driscoll's tenure, private companies also committed more than $25 billion to projects involving data centres, critical mineral refineries and dining facilities at Army bases across the United States.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tehran-grants-iraqi-oil-tankers-permission-to-pass-through-strait-of-hormuz-iran-state-media-1787418007916">Tehran grants Iraqi oil tankers permission to pass through Strait of Hormuz: Iran state media</a><h2>Partnership with George disrupted</h2>Driscoll's partnership with George was interrupted when Hegseth abruptly removed the Army chief in April. The decision drew criticism from members of Congress, including Republicans who expressed support for George. During a congressional hearing, Driscoll avoided directly criticising Hegseth but made his support for George clear.&nbsp;"I, too, love Gen. George," Driscoll told lawmakers, describing him as “an amazing, transformational leader.” Despite uncertainty over his own future, Driscoll received public praise from Trump at a defence conference in Pennsylvania last month.&nbsp;Trump highlighted Driscoll's presence while portraying the Army secretary as someone whose appearance did not reflect his toughness. "With that beautiful smile, but he's actually a killer. Look at that beautiful, nice face. Everything's so happy. He's a killer. Would you believe it? Those are the best guys, actually," Trump said.

Dan Driscoll may leave as US Army secretary by year-end amid tensions with Pete Hegseth, following the removal of Army chief Randy George

US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll is expected to leave his position by the end of the year amid growing tensions with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal. Driscoll's possible departure would create another leadership gap at the top of the US Army, which has already been without a Senate-confirmed chief since Hegseth removed Army Chief of Staff General Randy George in April. Hegseth dismissed George without publicly giving a reason and has not yet nominated a permanent successor. General Christopher LaNeve, the Army's vice chief of staff and a former senior military aide to Hegseth, is currently serving as acting Army chief of staff. According to the report, Driscoll and his family moved out of the official family residence at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall this summer. His family has relocated to North Carolina, while Driscoll is now living in a smaller apartment on the military installation. Driscoll's relationship with Hegseth strained A former Army Ranger and long-time friend of Vice President JD Vance, Driscoll reportedly came under Hegseth's scrutiny early in the Trump administration. The tensions emerged after Driscoll attempted to arrange a visit for Vance and President Donald Trump to meet soldiers and discuss proposed reforms to the Army. Despite the strained relationship with Hegseth, Driscoll developed a strong partnership with George during his approximately 18 months as Army secretary. The two pushed the Army to adopt emerging technologies and argued that commercially developed innovations could have a major impact on the future of warfare. Driscoll also travelled to Ukraine alongside George and General Chris Donahue, who was then the Army's senior general in Europe. During the visit, Driscoll met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and discussed peace negotiations. He encouraged the Army to draw lessons from the war in Ukraine, particularly regarding the use of commercially available technology on the battlefield. During Driscoll's tenure, private companies also committed more than $25 billion to projects involving data centres, critical mineral refineries and dining facilities at Army bases across the United States. Also Read: Tehran grants Iraqi oil tankers permission to pass through Strait of Hormuz: Iran state media Partnership with George disrupted Driscoll's partnership with George was interrupted when Hegseth abruptly removed the Army chief in April. The decision drew criticism from members of Congress, including Republicans who expressed support for George. During a congressional hearing, Driscoll avoided directly criticising Hegseth but made his support for George clear. "I, too, love Gen. George," Driscoll told lawmakers, describing him as “an amazing, transformational leader.” Despite uncertainty over his own future, Driscoll received public praise from Trump at a defence conference in Pennsylvania last month. Trump highlighted Driscoll's presence while portraying the Army secretary as someone whose appearance did not reflect his toughness. "With that beautiful smile, but he's actually a killer. Look at that beautiful, nice face. Everything's so happy. He's a killer. Would you believe it? Those are the best guys, actually," Trump said.

As per report, Dan Driscoll may leave as US Army secretary by year-end amid tensions with Pete Hegseth, adding to uncertainty over Army leadership

Dan Driscoll to leave US Army secretary post amid tension with Hegseth? Here's what report claims

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has faced growing criticism over the prolonged war in Iran, mounting pressure on US troops and depleted weapon stockpiles. Now, scrutiny is also growing over the role of his wife, Jennifer Hegseth, and her reported influence inside the Pentagon.&nbsp;Her role came under scrutiny last year after The Wall Street Journal reported that she attended two meetings where sensitive information was discussed.&nbsp;In February 2025, Jennifer Hegseth was reportedly present at a meeting with NATO defence ministers after the US decided to cut off military intelligence sharing with Ukraine. She was also reportedly present at a March 6 meeting involving then UK Defence Secretary John Healey and Britain's military chief. Her presence drew attention because she is not a formal employee of the US Department of War.&nbsp;Reports also said she was part of a Signal group chat where sensitive military operations were discussed. In one instance, Hegseth reportedly shared specific details about when US forces would strike Houthi targets in Yemen on March 15, 2025.&nbsp;Jennifer Hegseth has also been described in reports as a de facto producer at the Pentagon. She is believed to have attended her husband's meetings with journalists, interviewed potential staff members and helped develop ideas for department videos. Reports further suggested that she played a key role in efforts to restrict reporters' access to the Pentagon.&nbsp;Jennifer Hegseth has around three decades of experience in media and previously developed and ran several shows for Fox News. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump appointed her to lead the President's Military Spouse Commission, which focuses on issues affecting service members and their families.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/cynical-and-despicable-attack-russian-drones-strike-shopping-centre-in-kryvyi-rih-killing-five-and-injuring-multiple-1787327458151">'Cynical and despicable attack': Russian drones strike shopping centre in Kryvyi Rih, killing five and injuring multiple</a>&nbsp;Her reported involvement in Pentagon affairs has drawn criticism from some former officials. Former Pentagon chief spokesperson John Ullyot, who left his position last year, expressed disbelief that Hegseth allegedly involved his wife in sensitive official duties without facing consequences.&nbsp;Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, however, defended her involvement, describing her as a "vital asset" and "force multiplier". He also indicated that the Pentagon intends to involve her more closely in the future.&nbsp;The controversy comes as Hegseth faces separate criticism over the reported condition of US troops. Reports have claimed that sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln were running short of food, toothpaste and soap, with some allegedly attempting to jump overboard. Hegseth has denied those reports.&nbsp;With questions now surrounding both his wartime leadership and his wife's reported Pentagon influence, scrutiny of the US defence secretary is likely to continue.

Pete Hegseth faces growing scrutiny over his leadership of the Iran war and his wife Jennifer Hegseth's reported involvement in sensitive Pentagon affairs.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has faced growing criticism over the prolonged war in Iran, mounting pressure on US troops and depleted weapon stockpiles. Now, scrutiny is also growing over the role of his wife, Jennifer Hegseth, and her reported influence inside the Pentagon. Her role came under scrutiny last year after The Wall Street Journal reported that she attended two meetings where sensitive information was discussed. In February 2025, Jennifer Hegseth was reportedly present at a meeting with NATO defence ministers after the US decided to cut off military intelligence sharing with Ukraine. She was also reportedly present at a March 6 meeting involving then UK Defence Secretary John Healey and Britain's military chief. Her presence drew attention because she is not a formal employee of the US Department of War. Reports also said she was part of a Signal group chat where sensitive military operations were discussed. In one instance, Hegseth reportedly shared specific details about when US forces would strike Houthi targets in Yemen on March 15, 2025. Jennifer Hegseth has also been described in reports as a de facto producer at the Pentagon. She is believed to have attended her husband's meetings with journalists, interviewed potential staff members and helped develop ideas for department videos. Reports further suggested that she played a key role in efforts to restrict reporters' access to the Pentagon. Jennifer Hegseth has around three decades of experience in media and previously developed and ran several shows for Fox News. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump appointed her to lead the President's Military Spouse Commission, which focuses on issues affecting service members and their families. Also Read: 'Cynical and despicable attack': Russian drones strike shopping centre in Kryvyi Rih, killing five and injuring multiple Her reported involvement in Pentagon affairs has drawn criticism from some former officials. Former Pentagon chief spokesperson John Ullyot, who left his position last year, expressed disbelief that Hegseth allegedly involved his wife in sensitive official duties without facing consequences. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, however, defended her involvement, describing her as a "vital asset" and "force multiplier". He also indicated that the Pentagon intends to involve her more closely in the future. The controversy comes as Hegseth faces separate criticism over the reported condition of US troops. Reports have claimed that sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln were running short of food, toothpaste and soap, with some allegedly attempting to jump overboard. Hegseth has denied those reports. With questions now surrounding both his wartime leadership and his wife's reported Pentagon influence, scrutiny of the US defence secretary is likely to continue.

Pete Hegseth faces growing scrutiny over his leadership of the Iran war and his wife Jennifer Hegseth's reported involvement in sensitive Pentagon affairs.

Hegseth under fire as wife's Pentagon role adds to war leadership questions | Gravitas

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s wife attended a sensitive Pentagon meeting involving British officials and discussions about the risks facing UK personnel in Ukraine. Her presence at the high-level gathering has raised questions.&nbsp;Jennifer Rauchet, who had no official role in the Trump administration at the time, attended the meeting only for introductions, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told The Times in response to its report published on Wednesday (Aug 19). British officials reportedly waited for Rauchet to leave before discussing their officers stationed in Ukraine in greater detail, according to the newspaper.&nbsp;The meeting included senior British officials, including the then-head of the UK armed forces. The Wall Street Journal had previously reported on Rauchet’s attendance in March 2025, but The Times reported that the gathering also involved discussions about British personnel operating on the ground in Ukraine amid the war with Russia.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/never-thought-they-were-going-to-betray-me-like-this-ex-cia-informant-who-helped-in-intel-on-osama-bin-laden-faces-deportation-1787211814870">‘Never thought they were going to betray me like this’: Ex-CIA informant who helped in intel on Osama bin Laden faces deportation</a>&nbsp;The episode has drawn criticism from former Pentagon officials. John Ullyot, who previously served as the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, told The Times that it was “bonkers” for a defence secretary to involve his wife in sensitive official duties.&nbsp;Ullyot also argued that US President Donald Trump “deserves better judgment from his national security leaders” and questioned why Hegseth had faced no apparent consequences over Rauchet’s presence at sensitive meetings.&nbsp;He also referred to other controversies involving Hegseth, including the Signal group chat incident last year in which senior Trump administration officials discussed planned US strikes on Yemen in a group that accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-natalie-harp-trump-s-human-printer-is-making-headlines-again-here-s-why-1787024735322">Who is Natalie Harp? Trump’s ‘human printer’ is making headlines again. Here’s why</a>&nbsp;The Pentagon pushed back against Ullyot’s criticism. Acting Pentagon press secretary Joel Valdez accused him of attacking Hegseth after leaving the administration, calling his comments embarrassing. Valdez also shared a post by Donald Trump J., who had previously said Ullyot was “officially exiled from our movement” after he left the Pentagon in April 2025.&nbsp;

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth faces criticism after his wife, Jennifer Rauchet, attended a sensitive Pentagon meeting with British officials regarding UK personnel in Ukraine despite lacking an official role.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s wife attended a sensitive Pentagon meeting involving British officials and discussions about the risks facing UK personnel in Ukraine. Her presence at the high-level gathering has raised questions. Jennifer Rauchet, who had no official role in the Trump administration at the time, attended the meeting only for introductions, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told The Times in response to its report published on Wednesday (Aug 19). British officials reportedly waited for Rauchet to leave before discussing their officers stationed in Ukraine in greater detail, according to the newspaper. The meeting included senior British officials, including the then-head of the UK armed forces. The Wall Street Journal had previously reported on Rauchet’s attendance in March 2025, but The Times reported that the gathering also involved discussions about British personnel operating on the ground in Ukraine amid the war with Russia. Also read: ‘Never thought they were going to betray me like this’: Ex-CIA informant who helped in intel on Osama bin Laden faces deportation The episode has drawn criticism from former Pentagon officials. John Ullyot, who previously served as the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, told The Times that it was “bonkers” for a defence secretary to involve his wife in sensitive official duties. Ullyot also argued that US President Donald Trump “deserves better judgment from his national security leaders” and questioned why Hegseth had faced no apparent consequences over Rauchet’s presence at sensitive meetings. He also referred to other controversies involving Hegseth, including the Signal group chat incident last year in which senior Trump administration officials discussed planned US strikes on Yemen in a group that accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief. Also read: Who is Natalie Harp? Trump’s ‘human printer’ is making headlines again. Here’s why The Pentagon pushed back against Ullyot’s criticism. Acting Pentagon press secretary Joel Valdez accused him of attacking Hegseth after leaving the administration, calling his comments embarrassing. Valdez also shared a post by Donald Trump J., who had previously said Ullyot was “officially exiled from our movement” after he left the Pentagon in April 2025.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth faces criticism after his wife, Jennifer Rauchet, attended a sensitive Pentagon meeting with British officials regarding UK personnel in Ukraine despite lacking an official role.

‘She has no official role’: Questions mount after Hegseth’s wife attended sensitive Pentagon meeting on Ukraine

The United States is expanding its campaign against drug cartels across Latin America as Colombia joins the U.S.-led Americas Counter-Cartel Coalition. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Colombia has authorised joint military operations targeting terrorist organisations and narco-terror networks.

Hegseth also signalled a more aggressive approach to cartel networks, comparing the planned campaign with tactics used against ISIS and al-Qaeda. The latest move could significantly deepen military and intelligence cooperation between Washington and Bogotá.

U.S. Leads New Anti-Cartel Bloc, as Hegseth Vows 'ISIS-Style' Ops Against Cartels

Reports claim U.S. President Donald Trump clashed with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over concerns about shrinking U.S. munitions stockpiles amid ongoing military operations. According to reports, Trump sought answers over missile shortages and the Pentagon's preparedness, while the White House has disputed accounts of a major confrontation and insists the United States has sufficient weapons supplies.

Donald Trump Reportedly Clashed with Pete Hegseth Over the Shortage of Munitions 

The Trump administration is facing mounting criticism over how US military casualties from the Iran conflict are being reported. A controversy erupted after four American service members who died during the conflict temporarily disappeared from the Pentagon's casualty reporting website before reappearing under a different category.

Critics argue the reclassification could obscure the true human cost of the conflict and influence legal and political debates surrounding the war. Democratic lawmakers have demanded greater transparency, while questions continue over whether the administration's reporting complies with the War Powers Act and provides the public with a complete picture of US military losses.

Pentagon Under Fire Over Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Faces Backlash

The Pentagon announced a mandatory annual testosterone screening program for U.S. military personnel aged 30 and older. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated the policy aims to identify and treat hormone deficiencies to optimize troop readiness and operational performance, with any resulting Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT) being entirely voluntary.


Can testosterone levels measure military readiness?

The U.S. military has introduced annual testosterone deficiency screenings for service members aged 30 and above as part of its routine health evaluations. Announcing the initiative, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the program is intended to ensure troops maintain healthy testosterone levels so they can perform at their best. According to the Pentagon, service members found to have low testosterone will be offered voluntary hormone replacement therapy, with officials emphasizing that the initiative is focused on restoring natural hormone levels rather than providing artificial performance enhancement.

U.S. Military introduces testosterone testing for troops over 30 | Pentagon's new health policy

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Wednesday (Jul 16) announced that all US troops, including women, will now have to get a screening for “testosterone deficiency”. He said that the move was necessary to allow them to operate at their “absolute best”. The screening program will be conducted annually as part of the required medical screenings for service members aged 30 and older. Hegseth said soldiers with low testosterone can receive a hormone treatment voluntarily. He did not specify whether female troops will be included in the screening process.“Our most decisive tactical advantage will always be the individual warfighter,” Hegseth said in a video message on X. “We have a sacred duty to maintain that advantage.”Hegseth said that the goal behind the screening program was a “High-T Department of War” – his preferred name for the Department of Defence.Under the program, troops under 30 can also volunteer to be screened. Anyone with low testosterone levels can opt to receive testosterone replacement therapy, or TRT.“It’s about restoring and optimising your natural capability,” Hegseth said.&nbsp;Also read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/i-have-something-unique-to-offer-indian-origin-democrat-ro-khanna-eyes-2028-us-presidential-race-1783845781244"> Ro Khanna eyeing 2028 US presidential race? Indian-origin Democrat says, ‘I have something unique to offer...’</a><h2>Pentagon’s ‘double standards’</h2>Hegseth’s latest announcement comes after US President Donald Trump last year banned transgender troops from serving in the US military. Pentagon had backed the ban, saying that transgender troops may not be able to access hormone therapy during wars. The policy is facing a legal challenge in federal courts.“The Armed Forces must adhere to high mental and physical health standards to ensure our military can deploy, fight, and win, including in austere conditions and without the benefit of routine medical treatment or special provisions,” the Trump administration said at the time of announcing the transgender ban.Shannon Minter, the legal director for the National Centre for LGBTQ Rights, questioned the “double standards” of the Trump administration over its contradictory reasoning.“Hegseth’s recommendation that male service members take testosterone makes crystal clear that the policy banning transgender troops for taking the same medication is pure bias,” said Minter. “This is a blatant double standard and underscores the irrationality of the ban.” Watch | U.S.-Iran war intensifies | Fresh American strikes hit Iran as Trump issues new warning to Tehran<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-iran-war-intensifies-fresh-american-strikes-hit-iran-as-trump-issues-new-warning-to-tehran-1784171541103/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-iran-war-intensifies-fresh-american-strikes-hit-iran-as-trump-issues-new-warning-to-tehran-1784171541103/embed</a>&nbsp;

US troops aged 30 and above will undergo annual testosterone deficiency screening, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth announced. Those with low levels can voluntarily receive hormone replacement therapy.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Wednesday (Jul 16) announced that all US troops, including women, will now have to get a screening for “testosterone deficiency”. He said that the move was necessary to allow them to operate at their “absolute best”. The screening program will be conducted annually as part of the required medical screenings for service members aged 30 and older. Hegseth said soldiers with low testosterone can receive a hormone treatment voluntarily. He did not specify whether female troops will be included in the screening process. “Our most decisive tactical advantage will always be the individual warfighter,” Hegseth said in a video message on X. “We have a sacred duty to maintain that advantage.” Hegseth said that the goal behind the screening program was a “High-T Department of War” – his preferred name for the Department of Defence. Under the program, troops under 30 can also volunteer to be screened. Anyone with low testosterone levels can opt to receive testosterone replacement therapy, or TRT. “It’s about restoring and optimising your natural capability,” Hegseth said. Also read | Ro Khanna eyeing 2028 US presidential race? Indian-origin Democrat says, ‘I have something unique to offer...’ Pentagon’s ‘double standards’ Hegseth’s latest announcement comes after US President Donald Trump last year banned transgender troops from serving in the US military. Pentagon had backed the ban, saying that transgender troops may not be able to access hormone therapy during wars. The policy is facing a legal challenge in federal courts. “The Armed Forces must adhere to high mental and physical health standards to ensure our military can deploy, fight, and win, including in austere conditions and without the benefit of routine medical treatment or special provisions,” the Trump administration said at the time of announcing the transgender ban. Shannon Minter, the legal director for the National Centre for LGBTQ Rights, questioned the “double standards” of the Trump administration over its contradictory reasoning. “Hegseth’s recommendation that male service members take testosterone makes crystal clear that the policy banning transgender troops for taking the same medication is pure bias,” said Minter. “This is a blatant double standard and underscores the irrationality of the ban.” Watch | U.S.-Iran war intensifies | Fresh American strikes hit Iran as Trump issues new warning to Tehran https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-iran-war-intensifies-fresh-american-strikes-hit-iran-as-trump-issues-new-warning-to-tehran-1784171541103/embed

US troops aged 30 and above will undergo annual testosterone deficiency screening, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth announced. Those with low levels can voluntarily receive hormone replacement therapy.

‘High-T Department of War’: Hegseth mandates testosterone screening for US troops

Tensions in the Middle East have escalated as US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (Jul 8) that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is "over", following renewed strikes and alleged violations by both sides. Trump's remarks at the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, sparked rise in oil prices and stock market volatility across the world. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancelled a planned trip to Israel, Israeli media reported. Is the war back?<h2>Trump thinks further dealings with Iran are a waste of time</h2>Making some harsh remarks in which he described Iranian leaders as "scum", the US president said further dealings with them were a waste of time. He allowed negotiators to continue talks if they wished, but said the MoU was "over". Just hours earlier, US and Iranian forces had traded strikes, including military actions around the Strait of Hormuz.<h2>Iran accuses the US of violating the MoU, strikes sites in Kuwait, Bahrain</h2>Iran accused the US of violating the MoU, which was signed in mid-June 2026 at the Palace of Versailles and aimed at ending the active hostilities that began in late February. The MoU was intended to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restore freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, reduce military tensions in the Gulf, and lay the groundwork for broader diplomatic talks.Reports said that Iran targeted military interests in Kuwait and Bahrain. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said one of its fighters was killed in an ‘enemy drone strike’, according to Iranian state media. A senior IRGC commander warned that any location supporting US attacks would be considered a legitimate target, Iranian state media reported.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-strikes-on-iran-4-5-times-bigger-than-previous-wave-officials-1783469488428">US strikes on Iran '4-5 times bigger' than previous wave: Officials</a><h2>Oil markets react immediately to war talk</h2>Oil prices are rising - by up to 6 per cent in some cases- at the time of writing this, amid fears that hostilities would resume. Brent crude prices jumped towards $79 per barrel as traders reacted to the risk of disruption to roughly 20 per cent of global oil flows that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Earlier in the conflict, prices had surged dramatically to more than US$120 per barrel at their peak before easing following the truce.&nbsp;The latest volatility echoes previous price spikes linked to attacks on shipping and energy infrastructure in the region.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-there-ll-either-be-deal-or-us-will-finish-job-says-trump-1783402027929/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-there-ll-either-be-deal-or-us-will-finish-job-says-trump-1783402027929/embed</a><h2>US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancels Israel trip</h2>The Jerusalem Post reported citing sources that Hegseth cancelled a planned visit to Israel on Wednesday, during which he was due to meet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz. Hegseth, who is in Ankara with Trump for the NATO summit, was expected to make a brief visit in the wake of the overnight US strikes against Iran, which Washington said were in response to Iranian attacks targeting three commercial tankers in the waters off Oman, near the Strait of Hormuz, the report said.(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.) &nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump said the peace MoU is "over" after renewed tit-for-tat strikes. Oil prices are surging again. Pete Hegseth cancelled his Israel trip. Is Iran war back? 

Tensions in the Middle East have escalated as US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (Jul 8) that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is "over", following renewed strikes and alleged violations by both sides. Trump's remarks at the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, sparked rise in oil prices and stock market volatility across the world. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancelled a planned trip to Israel, Israeli media reported. Is the war back? Trump thinks further dealings with Iran are a waste of time Making some harsh remarks in which he described Iranian leaders as "scum", the US president said further dealings with them were a waste of time. He allowed negotiators to continue talks if they wished, but said the MoU was "over". Just hours earlier, US and Iranian forces had traded strikes, including military actions around the Strait of Hormuz. Iran accuses the US of violating the MoU, strikes sites in Kuwait, Bahrain Iran accused the US of violating the MoU, which was signed in mid-June 2026 at the Palace of Versailles and aimed at ending the active hostilities that began in late February. The MoU was intended to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restore freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, reduce military tensions in the Gulf, and lay the groundwork for broader diplomatic talks. Reports said that Iran targeted military interests in Kuwait and Bahrain. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said one of its fighters was killed in an ‘enemy drone strike’, according to Iranian state media. A senior IRGC commander warned that any location supporting US attacks would be considered a legitimate target, Iranian state media reported. Also read: US strikes on Iran '4-5 times bigger' than previous wave: Officials Oil markets react immediately to war talk Oil prices are rising - by up to 6 per cent in some cases- at the time of writing this, amid fears that hostilities would resume. Brent crude prices jumped towards $79 per barrel as traders reacted to the risk of disruption to roughly 20 per cent of global oil flows that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Earlier in the conflict, prices had surged dramatically to more than US$120 per barrel at their peak before easing following the truce. The latest volatility echoes previous price spikes linked to attacks on shipping and energy infrastructure in the region. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-there-ll-either-be-deal-or-us-will-finish-job-says-trump-1783402027929/embed US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancels Israel trip The Jerusalem Post reported citing sources that Hegseth cancelled a planned visit to Israel on Wednesday, during which he was due to meet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz. Hegseth, who is in Ankara with Trump for the NATO summit, was expected to make a brief visit in the wake of the overnight US strikes against Iran, which Washington said were in response to Iranian attacks targeting three commercial tankers in the waters off Oman, near the Strait of Hormuz, the report said. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Trump said the peace MoU is "over" after renewed tit-for-tat strikes. Oil prices are surging again. Pete Hegseth cancelled his Israel trip. Is Iran war back?&nbsp;

War clouds loom over Iran once again? Hegseth cancels Israel trip, oil prices rise as Trump says peace deal is ‘over’

General Chris Donahue, known as the last American soldier to leave Afghanistan during the US withdrawal in 2021, will step down from his role as commander of US Army forces in Europe and Africa next month.&nbsp;Army spokeswoman Cynthia Smith said Donahue "will relinquish command on July 2, 2026," but did not provide a reason for his departure after serving just 18 months in the position.&nbsp;His deputy will take over responsibilities until a replacement is named. Smith said, "The Army thanks Gen. Donahue for his leadership of US Army Europe and Africa."&nbsp;A graduate of West Point, Donahue was commissioned as an Army officer in 1992. He became widely known as the final US service member to board the last evacuation flight from Kabul as the United States ended its two-decade military presence in Afghanistan in 2021.&nbsp;During his military career, he led the 82nd Airborne Division and later commanded the XVIII Airborne Corps before assuming his current post in December 2024.&nbsp;According to ABC News, another US official said Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had been preparing to reduce Donahue's command from a four-star position to a three-star role, lowering its authority and responsibilities.&nbsp;Before this development, Donahue had been viewed as a strong candidate for future senior positions, including Army chief of staff and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, because of his extensive operational experience.&nbsp;The Washington Post described the move as the "latest apparent casualty in Hegseth’s purge of senior military leaders" involving officers considered insufficiently loyal to the Trump administration or criticised as "woke" because of previous support for diversity initiatives.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/rubio-announces-next-round-of-iran-talks-vows-to-protect-gulf-allies-interests-1782334553087">Rubio announces next round of Iran talks, vows to protect Gulf allies' interests</a><h2>Donahue's exit comes amid Pentagon leadership shakeup</h2>Donahue's departure comes amid a broader shakeup of senior military leadership under President Donald Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has overseen the removal or departure of several senior officers.&nbsp;Among them was General Charles "CQ" Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was dismissed in February 2025 without a public explanation.&nbsp;Other high-ranking officers who have left their positions include the heads of the Army, Navy and Coast Guard, the leader of the National Security Agency, the vice chief of staff of the Air Force, a Navy admiral assigned to NATO and three senior military lawyers.&nbsp;Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has maintained that the administration is selecting the military leaders it wants. However, Democratic lawmakers have expressed concern that the traditionally nonpartisan military could become increasingly politicised.&nbsp;Last year, Hegseth ordered a reduction of at least 20 per cent in active duty four-star generals and admirals, along with a 10 per cent cut in the overall number of general and flag officers across the armed forces.

Donahue's exit comes as the Trump administration continues a wider reshuffle of senior military leadership under Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Since returning to the office last year, Trump has seen a number of top military officers leave their posts or be removed.

General Chris Donahue, known as the last American soldier to leave Afghanistan during the US withdrawal in 2021, will step down from his role as commander of US Army forces in Europe and Africa next month. Army spokeswoman Cynthia Smith said Donahue "will relinquish command on July 2, 2026," but did not provide a reason for his departure after serving just 18 months in the position. His deputy will take over responsibilities until a replacement is named. Smith said, "The Army thanks Gen. Donahue for his leadership of US Army Europe and Africa." A graduate of West Point, Donahue was commissioned as an Army officer in 1992. He became widely known as the final US service member to board the last evacuation flight from Kabul as the United States ended its two-decade military presence in Afghanistan in 2021. During his military career, he led the 82nd Airborne Division and later commanded the XVIII Airborne Corps before assuming his current post in December 2024. According to ABC News, another US official said Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had been preparing to reduce Donahue's command from a four-star position to a three-star role, lowering its authority and responsibilities. Before this development, Donahue had been viewed as a strong candidate for future senior positions, including Army chief of staff and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, because of his extensive operational experience. The Washington Post described the move as the "latest apparent casualty in Hegseth’s purge of senior military leaders" involving officers considered insufficiently loyal to the Trump administration or criticised as "woke" because of previous support for diversity initiatives. Also Read: Rubio announces next round of Iran talks, vows to protect Gulf allies' interests Donahue's exit comes amid Pentagon leadership shakeup Donahue's departure comes amid a broader shakeup of senior military leadership under President Donald Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has overseen the removal or departure of several senior officers. Among them was General Charles "CQ" Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was dismissed in February 2025 without a public explanation. Other high-ranking officers who have left their positions include the heads of the Army, Navy and Coast Guard, the leader of the National Security Agency, the vice chief of staff of the Air Force, a Navy admiral assigned to NATO and three senior military lawyers. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has maintained that the administration is selecting the military leaders it wants. However, Democratic lawmakers have expressed concern that the traditionally nonpartisan military could become increasingly politicised. Last year, Hegseth ordered a reduction of at least 20 per cent in active duty four-star generals and admirals, along with a 10 per cent cut in the overall number of general and flag officers across the armed forces.

Donahue's exit comes as the Trump administration continues a wider reshuffle of senior military leadership under Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Since returning to the office last year, Trump has seen a number of top military officers leave their posts or be removed.

Famed 'last soldier out of Afghanistan', top US Army general resigns amid Hegseth's Pentagon purge

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday (June 18) said NATO has to go back to its core format of a "hardline" military alliance. Speaking at the ​NATO ⁠headquarters, he also said that the United States will openly speak about countries ‌that need to do more ‌to meet their commitments.&nbsp;"(There are) some that still need ⁠to do more, and we will ​be candid about that, both in ⁠private and in public. I ⁠think ​that's important, friends being honest with friends," Hegseth said ⁠at the meeting of ⁠defense ⁠ministers in Brussels.&nbsp;Hegseth called to revamp the 32-nation organization to turn it into a “NATO 3.0” - having the potential of deterring any threat.&nbsp;“NATO 3.0 is post-Cold War recognition that (NATO) needs to go back to a real hard-line military alliance that has real military capabilities capable of deterring right here on the continent and taking the lead for the conventional defense of Europe,” Hegseth said.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/unfair-for-them-not-to-have-some-trump-says-iran-can-have-ballistic-missiles-as-peace-deal-takes-effect-1781755731618">‘Unfair for them not to have some’: Trump says Iran can have ballistic missiles as peace deal takes effect</a><h2>'Think strongly in terms of defence'</h2>&nbsp;Speaking to reporters he also highlighted that the United States would be investing $1.5 trillion in its own defense in 2027, and called it &nbsp;an “arsenal of freedom.”&nbsp;"This arsenal first and foremost protects America and American interests but also backstops the strength of NATO and our allies," said Hegseth.&nbsp;He urged US allies (NATO countries) to think strongly in terms of defence of their own continent.&nbsp;The statement comes after US signaled on June 3 that it would no longer supply an aircraft carrier and support ships, aerial refueling planes and dozens of fighter jets, among other military assets to its European allies in terms of crisis.&nbsp;The Trump administration argues that it needs more military resources at hand in the scenario of a conflict with China in the Indo-Pacific region.&nbsp;

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called to revamp the 32-nation organization to turn it into a “NATO 3.0” - having the potential of deterring any threat.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday (June 18) said NATO has to go back to its core format of a "hardline" military alliance. Speaking at the NATO ⁠headquarters, he also said that the United States will openly speak about countries ‌that need to do more ‌to meet their commitments. "(There are) some that still need ⁠to do more, and we will be candid about that, both in ⁠private and in public. I ⁠think that's important, friends being honest with friends," Hegseth said ⁠at the meeting of ⁠defense ⁠ministers in Brussels. Hegseth called to revamp the 32-nation organization to turn it into a “NATO 3.0” - having the potential of deterring any threat. “NATO 3.0 is post-Cold War recognition that (NATO) needs to go back to a real hard-line military alliance that has real military capabilities capable of deterring right here on the continent and taking the lead for the conventional defense of Europe,” Hegseth said. ALSO READ: ‘Unfair for them not to have some’: Trump says Iran can have ballistic missiles as peace deal takes effect 'Think strongly in terms of defence' Speaking to reporters he also highlighted that the United States would be investing $1.5 trillion in its own defense in 2027, and called it an “arsenal of freedom.” "This arsenal first and foremost protects America and American interests but also backstops the strength of NATO and our allies," said Hegseth. He urged US allies (NATO countries) to think strongly in terms of defence of their own continent. The statement comes after US signaled on June 3 that it would no longer supply an aircraft carrier and support ships, aerial refueling planes and dozens of fighter jets, among other military assets to its European allies in terms of crisis. The Trump administration argues that it needs more military resources at hand in the scenario of a conflict with China in the Indo-Pacific region.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called to revamp the 32-nation organization to turn it into a “NATO 3.0” - having the potential of deterring any threat.

NATO needs to revamp, do more to meet commitments, says Hegseth in Brussels

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth gives doorstep interview during NATO defence ministers' meetings at alliance headquarters ahead of the Ankara leaders' summit. Watch the full video to know more on this!

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Makes Important Announcement In Brussels 

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth used the 82nd anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy to urge European nations to take stronger action against migration and increase their contribution to the continent’s defence.&nbsp;Speaking on Saturday at the American military cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer, France, Hegseth drew a parallel between the challenges Europe faced during World War II and what he described as present-day threats stemming from migration.&nbsp;"Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies," Hegseth said.&nbsp;Referring to migrant arrivals along Europe's southern coastline, he added: "On beaches in Spain and Italy and Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive."&nbsp;"When will European capitals do something about that invasion? Or is it too late?"His remarks reflect the position frequently advanced by US President Donald Trump's administration, which argues that large-scale migration poses a threat to European civilisation and security.&nbsp;The US Defence Secretary also called on European allies to play a larger role in ensuring their own security and defence capabilities. "May we learn from this past," Hegseth said while commemorating the Allied landings that helped liberate Nazi-occupied France during World War II.&nbsp;Addressing attendees gathered among the 9,387 white crosses marking American soldiers killed during the Battle of Normandy, he praised the commitment shown by Allied nations during the war.&nbsp;"The men buried here fought in a war-fighting alliance where every partner... brought its full measure of industry, courage and sacrifice," he said&nbsp;His comments come as the Trump administration continues to press NATO allies to increase defence spending and assume a greater share of responsibility for European security.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/wonderful-world-a-once-in-a-century-celestial-event-the-6-minute-solar-eclipse-that-will-turn-day-into-night-1780776951200">Wonderful World | A once-in-a-century celestial event: The 6-minute solar eclipse that will turn day into night</a>&nbsp;Hegseth reiterated that while the United States remains committed to leadership, allies must be prepared to contribute equally when required.&nbsp;"America will lead," he said, but added that its "capable allies must be right there with us, shoulder-to-shoulder in the breach when it matters".&nbsp;The administration has repeatedly criticised European nations for relying heavily on US military support and has at times questioned Washington's long-term commitment to the NATO alliance.&nbsp;The D-Day landings of June 6, 1944, remain the largest seaborne military operation in history, involving tens of thousands of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada landing on five beaches along the Normandy coast in a decisive operation against Nazi Germany.

Marking the 82nd anniversary of the D-Day landings of June 6, 1944, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth drew parallels between the Allied fight against Nazi aggression and what he described as Europe's current migration challenge.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth used the 82nd anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy to urge European nations to take stronger action against migration and increase their contribution to the continent’s defence. Speaking on Saturday at the American military cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer, France, Hegseth drew a parallel between the challenges Europe faced during World War II and what he described as present-day threats stemming from migration. "Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies," Hegseth said. Referring to migrant arrivals along Europe's southern coastline, he added: "On beaches in Spain and Italy and Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive." "When will European capitals do something about that invasion? Or is it too late?" His remarks reflect the position frequently advanced by US President Donald Trump's administration, which argues that large-scale migration poses a threat to European civilisation and security. The US Defence Secretary also called on European allies to play a larger role in ensuring their own security and defence capabilities. "May we learn from this past," Hegseth said while commemorating the Allied landings that helped liberate Nazi-occupied France during World War II. Addressing attendees gathered among the 9,387 white crosses marking American soldiers killed during the Battle of Normandy, he praised the commitment shown by Allied nations during the war. "The men buried here fought in a war-fighting alliance where every partner... brought its full measure of industry, courage and sacrifice," he said His comments come as the Trump administration continues to press NATO allies to increase defence spending and assume a greater share of responsibility for European security. Also Read: Wonderful World | A once-in-a-century celestial event: The 6-minute solar eclipse that will turn day into night Hegseth reiterated that while the United States remains committed to leadership, allies must be prepared to contribute equally when required. "America will lead," he said, but added that its "capable allies must be right there with us, shoulder-to-shoulder in the breach when it matters". The administration has repeatedly criticised European nations for relying heavily on US military support and has at times questioned Washington's long-term commitment to the NATO alliance. The D-Day landings of June 6, 1944, remain the largest seaborne military operation in history, involving tens of thousands of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada landing on five beaches along the Normandy coast in a decisive operation against Nazi Germany.

Marking the 82nd anniversary of the D-Day landings of June 6, 1944, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth drew parallels between the Allied fight against Nazi aggression and what he described as Europe's current migration challenge.

‘When will Europe do something about the invasion?’: Hegseth urges action against migration in D-Day speech

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth renewed calls for America’s allies in Asia to increase military spending to boost deterrence against China, in a speech marked by a shift away from a confrontational stance toward Beijing.

“The era of the U.S. subsidizing the defense of wealthy nations is over. We need partners, not protectorates,” Hegseth said in a Saturday speech, while offering assurances that the Trump administration wouldn’t reduce the U.S. security presence in Asia as it seeks calmer ties with China.

Hegseth's Softer Tone on China Part of Broader Shift in US Policy?

Speaking at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth expressed a desire for "stable equilibrium" and "respectful" engagement with Beijing. While noting that U.S.-China relations have improved recently, Hegseth cautioned against China’s "historic military build-up" and the expansion of its military activities throughout the Indo-Pacific region. He emphasized that the U.S. seeks to maintain a durable balance of power to prevent any single state from imposing hegemony.  


Hegseth: US Seeks Stable, Respectful Relations With China; Flags China's Military Expansion

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Saturday (May 30) described India as a key pillar of stability in the Indo-Pacific, praising its military modernisation drive and growing defence-industrial capabilities as Washington seeks to strengthen partnerships across the region. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Hegseth said India plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of power in Asia and is increasingly taking on a larger security role, particularly in the Indian Ocean. "In South Asia, India is a critical anchor to hold the line," Hegseth said during his address.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-more-than-capable-of-restarting-war-with-iran-hegseth-amid-reports-of-depleted-missile-stockpiles-shangri-la-dialogue-security-summit-singapore-1780106328135">US 'more than capable' of restarting war with Iran, says Hegseth amid reports of depleted missile stockpiles</a><h2>How India helps maintain a balance of power</h2>"A powerful India acting in its own self-interest advances our shared goal of maintaining a balance of power across the region," said Hegseth. The remarks come amid growing strategic cooperation between New Delhi and Washington, as both countries seek closer alignment on regional security, defence manufacturing and maritime operations.Hegseth highlighted India's ongoing military modernisation efforts, saying the country is building the capabilities needed to support high-end military operations and contribute more significantly to regional security. "India is modernising its military to carry its share of the security burden, particularly in the Indian Ocean," he said.He also pointed to India's expanding defence manufacturing sector, describing it as an important component of broader US efforts to strengthen military readiness among partners and allies.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-s-military-build-up-causing-alarm-across-asia-says-hegseth-as-us-pushes-regional-balance-1780106901397">Hegseth at Shangri-La Dialogue warns China's military build-up causing 'alarm' across Asia, says US seeking 'stable equilibrium'</a><h2>Hegseth reveals why India's military expansion matters to the US</h2>According to Hegseth, India is developing the industrial and logistical infrastructure needed to support advanced military platforms, including maintenance and repair capabilities for US Navy vessels operating in the region. "This kind of industrial muscle isn't just a long-term goal, it's an immediate operational imperative," Hegseth said.The Pentagon chief also revealed that Washington and New Delhi are moving ahead with defence co-production initiatives, including efforts related to Javelin anti-tank guided missile systems."We've committed to pursuing co-production with India to advance capabilities like Javelin anti-tank guided munitions. These are real, tangible steps to improve the collective readiness of our forces," he said.Hegseth framed India's growing defence capabilities within the context of a broader US military expansion. He said the Trump administration plans a major increase in defence spending and manufacturing output."America is undergoing a historic national manufacturing mobilisation of our defence industrial base," he said, adding that President Donald Trump intends to make a "generational investment" in military capabilities.At the same time, Hegseth urged US allies and partners to increase their defence commitments, arguing that countries willing to shoulder greater responsibility would receive greater strategic cooperation from Washington. "Those nations that are most capable, clear-eyed, and ready to defend their national interests. For those nations, we are moving them to the front of the line," he said.

US calls India a "critical anchor" in the Indo-Pacific: At Asia's top security summit, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth praised India's military modernisation and growing defence industry, arguing that a stronger India helps maintain the regional balance of power.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Saturday (May 30) described India as a key pillar of stability in the Indo-Pacific, praising its military modernisation drive and growing defence-industrial capabilities as Washington seeks to strengthen partnerships across the region. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Hegseth said India plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of power in Asia and is increasingly taking on a larger security role, particularly in the Indian Ocean. "In South Asia, India is a critical anchor to hold the line," Hegseth said during his address. Also read | US 'more than capable' of restarting war with Iran, says Hegseth amid reports of depleted missile stockpiles How India helps maintain a balance of power "A powerful India acting in its own self-interest advances our shared goal of maintaining a balance of power across the region," said Hegseth. The remarks come amid growing strategic cooperation between New Delhi and Washington, as both countries seek closer alignment on regional security, defence manufacturing and maritime operations. Hegseth highlighted India's ongoing military modernisation efforts, saying the country is building the capabilities needed to support high-end military operations and contribute more significantly to regional security. "India is modernising its military to carry its share of the security burden, particularly in the Indian Ocean," he said. He also pointed to India's expanding defence manufacturing sector, describing it as an important component of broader US efforts to strengthen military readiness among partners and allies. Also read | Hegseth at Shangri-La Dialogue warns China's military build-up causing 'alarm' across Asia, says US seeking 'stable equilibrium' Hegseth reveals why India's military expansion matters to the US According to Hegseth, India is developing the industrial and logistical infrastructure needed to support advanced military platforms, including maintenance and repair capabilities for US Navy vessels operating in the region. "This kind of industrial muscle isn't just a long-term goal, it's an immediate operational imperative," Hegseth said. The Pentagon chief also revealed that Washington and New Delhi are moving ahead with defence co-production initiatives, including efforts related to Javelin anti-tank guided missile systems. "We've committed to pursuing co-production with India to advance capabilities like Javelin anti-tank guided munitions. These are real, tangible steps to improve the collective readiness of our forces," he said. Hegseth framed India's growing defence capabilities within the context of a broader US military expansion. He said the Trump administration plans a major increase in defence spending and manufacturing output. "America is undergoing a historic national manufacturing mobilisation of our defence industrial base," he said, adding that President Donald Trump intends to make a "generational investment" in military capabilities. At the same time, Hegseth urged US allies and partners to increase their defence commitments, arguing that countries willing to shoulder greater responsibility would receive greater strategic cooperation from Washington. "Those nations that are most capable, clear-eyed, and ready to defend their national interests. For those nations, we are moving them to the front of the line," he said.

US calls India a "critical anchor" in the Indo-Pacific: At Asia's top security summit, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth praised India's military modernisation and growing defence industry, arguing that a stronger India helps maintain the regional balance of power.

'Critical anchor': Hegseth at Shangri-La Dialogue lauds India, calls New Delhi a pillar of regional stability

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday (May 30) warned that China's rapidly expanding military capabilities are generating a "rightful alarm" across the Indo-Pacific, as Washington renewed its commitment to maintaining a balance of power in the region where no state has unchecked power.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-more-than-capable-of-restarting-war-with-iran-hegseth-amid-reports-of-depleted-missile-stockpiles-shangri-la-dialogue-security-summit-singapore-1780106328135">US 'more than capable' of restarting war with Iran, says Hegseth amid reports of depleted missile stockpiles</a><h2>Indo-Pacific nations 'alarmed' over China's rise</h2>Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's premier security forum, Hegseth said countries across the region were increasingly worried about Beijing's military expansion and its growing strategic footprint."When we look across the region today, there is rightful alarm regarding China's historic military build-up and the expansion of its military activities in the region and beyond," Hegseth said during his keynote address.His remarks come at a time of heightened tensions between Washington and Beijing over Taiwan, maritime disputes in the South China Sea and competition for influence across the Indo-Pacific.Despite the sharp criticism, Hegseth insisted the United States was not seeking confrontation with China. US does not seek "needless confrontation in the region," he told delegates, which included defence ministers, military officials and security experts from around 45 countries.Instead, the Pentagon chief said the US objective was to preserve stability by ensuring that no single country dominates the region.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/watch-blue-origin-s-new-glenn-rocket-explodes-on-launch-pad-during-hotfire-test-what-happened-video-1780021155966">Watch: Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket explodes in massive fireball during launch pad 'hotfire test'</a><h2>If not confrontation, what does the US want?</h2>According to Hegseth, Washington is working towards what he described as a "genuinely stable equilibrium" that benefits both the United States and its allies.He said this means maintaining "a favourable but durable balance of power in which no state, including China, can impose its hegemony and hold the security or prosperity of our nation and our allies in question."The comments reflect growing concern in Washington over China's military modernisation programme, which has seen Beijing rapidly expand its naval fleet, missile arsenal and air power over the past decade.

US warned that countries across the Indo-Pacific are increasingly alarmed by China. At Asia's biggest security forum, Pete Hegseth said Beijing's military expansion is causing growing concern across the region. Yet he insisted US is not seeking confrontation. So what does the US want?

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday (May 30) warned that China's rapidly expanding military capabilities are generating a "rightful alarm" across the Indo-Pacific, as Washington renewed its commitment to maintaining a balance of power in the region where no state has unchecked power. Also read | US 'more than capable' of restarting war with Iran, says Hegseth amid reports of depleted missile stockpiles Indo-Pacific nations 'alarmed' over China's rise Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's premier security forum, Hegseth said countries across the region were increasingly worried about Beijing's military expansion and its growing strategic footprint. "When we look across the region today, there is rightful alarm regarding China's historic military build-up and the expansion of its military activities in the region and beyond," Hegseth said during his keynote address. His remarks come at a time of heightened tensions between Washington and Beijing over Taiwan, maritime disputes in the South China Sea and competition for influence across the Indo-Pacific. Despite the sharp criticism, Hegseth insisted the United States was not seeking confrontation with China. US does not seek "needless confrontation in the region," he told delegates, which included defence ministers, military officials and security experts from around 45 countries. Instead, the Pentagon chief said the US objective was to preserve stability by ensuring that no single country dominates the region. Also read | Watch: Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket explodes in massive fireball during launch pad 'hotfire test' If not confrontation, what does the US want? According to Hegseth, Washington is working towards what he described as a "genuinely stable equilibrium" that benefits both the United States and its allies. He said this means maintaining "a favourable but durable balance of power in which no state, including China, can impose its hegemony and hold the security or prosperity of our nation and our allies in question." The comments reflect growing concern in Washington over China's military modernisation programme, which has seen Beijing rapidly expand its naval fleet, missile arsenal and air power over the past decade.

US warned that countries across the Indo-Pacific are increasingly alarmed by China. At Asia's biggest security forum, Pete Hegseth said Beijing's military expansion is causing growing concern across the region. Yet he insisted US is not seeking confrontation. So what does the US want?

Hegseth at Shangri-La Dialogue warns China's military build-up causing 'alarm' across Asia, says US seeking 'stable equilibrium'

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Saturday (May 30) dismissed concerns about America's military readiness, insisting the United States remains fully capable of launching fresh operations against Iran if necessary, even as a new report warns that key missile inventories could take years to replenish.Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue security summit in Singapore, Hegseth said the US military remains prepared for any future confrontation. "The United States is more than capable" of restarting military action against Iran if required, he said during the annual gathering of defence ministers, military officials and security experts from around 45 countries.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-s-military-build-up-causing-alarm-across-asia-says-hegseth-as-us-pushes-regional-balance-1780106901397">Hegseth at Shangri-La Dialogue warns China's military build-up causing 'alarm' across Asia</a><h2>US munition stockpiles depleted?</h2>Hegseth's remarks come as questions grow over the impact of the recent Iran conflict on US weapons stockpiles. A new analysis by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) found that three of America's most important missile systems, which were used extensively during the Iran war, could take at least three years to replenish.The report focuses on Tomahawk cruise missiles, Patriot air defence interceptors and THAAD missile defence systems, all of which play a critical role in modern US military operations.According to the analysis, the United States currently possesses enough munitions to handle any likely scenario involving Iran. However, researchers warned that "depleted inventories have created a window of vulnerability for a potential Western Pacific conflict".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-reveals-secret-3-month-head-start-on-exquisite-class-weapon-production-to-fuel-operation-epic-fury-against-iran-bae-lockheed-and-raytheon-1772844959324">Trump reveals US had secret 3-month head start on 'exquisite class' weapon production before Iran war</a> The think tank noted that rebuilding stockpiles is no longer primarily a funding issue. Instead, the challenge lies in manufacturing capacity and production timelines. "The problem today isn’t money; it’s time" the report said."It takes time to expand production capacity and build these complex systems," the report said, warning that vulnerabilities could persist for several years before inventories return to desired levels.The findings come despite the Trump administration's proposed $1.5 trillion defence budget for 2027, which includes a major increase in spending on advanced weapons systems.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Is the US really ready for another war with Iran? US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in Singapore insisted that America is "more than capable" of restarting the conflict. But a new analysis suggests key missile stockpiles used in the Iran war could take years to replenish. All you need to know

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Saturday (May 30) dismissed concerns about America's military readiness, insisting the United States remains fully capable of launching fresh operations against Iran if necessary, even as a new report warns that key missile inventories could take years to replenish. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue security summit in Singapore, Hegseth said the US military remains prepared for any future confrontation. "The United States is more than capable" of restarting military action against Iran if required, he said during the annual gathering of defence ministers, military officials and security experts from around 45 countries. Also read | Hegseth at Shangri-La Dialogue warns China's military build-up causing 'alarm' across Asia US munition stockpiles depleted? Hegseth's remarks come as questions grow over the impact of the recent Iran conflict on US weapons stockpiles. A new analysis by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) found that three of America's most important missile systems, which were used extensively during the Iran war, could take at least three years to replenish. The report focuses on Tomahawk cruise missiles, Patriot air defence interceptors and THAAD missile defence systems, all of which play a critical role in modern US military operations. According to the analysis, the United States currently possesses enough munitions to handle any likely scenario involving Iran. However, researchers warned that "depleted inventories have created a window of vulnerability for a potential Western Pacific conflict". Also read | Trump reveals US had secret 3-month head start on 'exquisite class' weapon production before Iran war The think tank noted that rebuilding stockpiles is no longer primarily a funding issue. Instead, the challenge lies in manufacturing capacity and production timelines. "The problem today isn’t money; it’s time" the report said. "It takes time to expand production capacity and build these complex systems," the report said, warning that vulnerabilities could persist for several years before inventories return to desired levels. The findings come despite the Trump administration's proposed $1.5 trillion defence budget for 2027, which includes a major increase in spending on advanced weapons systems. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Is the US really ready for another war with Iran? US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in Singapore insisted that America is "more than capable" of restarting the conflict. But a new analysis suggests key missile stockpiles used in the Iran war could take years to replenish. All you need to know

US 'more than capable' of restarting war with Iran, says Hegseth amid reports of depleted missile stockpiles

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth arrived in Singapore ahead of the Shangri-La Dialogue, where he is expected to meet regional leaders and defence counterparts for key security talks. Hegseth is set to hold meetings with Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing, and leaders from several Indo-Pacific nations as the United States looks to reinforce its regional strategy amid rising tensions with China, especially over Taiwan and the South China Sea.


Shangri-La Dialogue: Pete Hegseth Trains US Soldiers Stationed In Singapore

US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said on Wednesday that Washington is prepared to return to military action if negotiations with Iran fail to ensure that the Islamic Republic never acquires a nuclear weapon.Speaking at a White House Cabinet meeting, Hegseth said President Donald Trump had created the conditions to protect Americans and the wider world from what he called a generational threat from Iran.&nbsp;“There’s only one man over the course of both presidencies who has stood up and said they will never get a nuclear weapon,” Hegseth said, referring to Trump.&nbsp;<h2>‘US avoided old approach of Iraq and Afghanistan wars’</h2>&nbsp;Hegseth cited the killing of Qasem Soleimani, withdrawal from the Obama-era nuclear deal, the 12-day war and subsequent US military operations against Iran as part of a broader pressure campaign aimed at stopping Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.He said the US had avoided the “old approach” of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-pull-back-forces-from-iran-s-vicinity-lift-naval-blockade-claims-iran-s-state-media-1779889541135">US to pull back forces from Iran’s vicinity, lift naval blockade, claims Iran’s state media</a>&nbsp;“Instead, you said, we’re going to do this smart. We’re going to do it overwhelming. We’re going to use maximum lethality. And we’re going to bring them to their knees,” Hegseth said, referring to Trump.He said Iran’s navy was “at the bottom of the Persian Gulf” and that its air force, air defences and defence industrial base had been heavily damaged.&nbsp;“They may have missiles, but they can’t build more right now. And they can’t build more drones right now. And they can’t build more ships,” he said.Hegseth said it was those losses that made Tehran come to talks with US envoys, including Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner and Vice President JD Vance.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-push-for-muslim-nations-joining-abraham-accords-puts-pakistan-in-a-fix-1779729876943">Trump’s push for Muslim nations to join Abraham Accords puts Pakistan in a fix</a><h2>‘US imposed a world-class blockade, their economy is hurting big time’</h2>&nbsp;Hegseth further said that the US had imposed a “world-class blockade” on Iranian ports, preventing goods from entering or leaving and badly hurting Iran’s economy.“We know from the intel that their economy is hurting big time because that is their lifeblood,” he said.The US defence secretary added that Washington had expanded pressure on Iran’s shadow tanker fleet.“No Iranian tanker around the globe is safe,” he said, pointing to seizures that he said had further choked off Tehran’s economic lifeline.Hegseth added that the goal remained to ensure Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon, either through negotiations or, if necessary, by returning to military action.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/undeclared-chemical-weapons-from-former-president-assad-era-found-in-syria-1779829277892">Undeclared chemical weapons from former president Assad-era found in Syria</a><h2>‘Iran negotiating on fumes, will blow up Oman if…’</h2>&nbsp;Speaking in the cabinet meeting earlier, Trump said that Iran is “negotiating on fumes” and needs to make a deal.&nbsp;&nbsp;Referring to the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said, “Nobody's going to control it. We're going to watch over it. We'll watch over it. But nobody's going to control it. That's part of the negotiation that we have. They would like to control it. Nobody's going to control it. It's international waters. And Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we'll have to blow them up. They understand that. They'll be fine.”&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>‘Oil will be lower than pre-conflict levels when this ends,’ says Bessent</h2>&nbsp;Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that oil prices will be lower than before the Iran war when the conflict ends.“Oil will be lower than pre-conflict levels when this ends,” he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/skill-chance-irrelevant-if-money-staked-sc-upholds-retrospective-28-gst-levy-on-online-gaming-companies-1779884645944">‘Skill, chance irrelevant if money staked’: SC upholds retrospective 28% GST levy on online gaming companies</a><h2>‘Iran is never going to have a nuclear weapon’: Rubio</h2>&nbsp;US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said President Donald Trump prefers a negotiated diplomatic path with Iran and that talks have made some progress, but warned that Washington has other options if diplomacy fails.“The bottom line is Iran is never going to have a nuclear weapon,” Rubio said, adding that the recent events had reinforced Washington’s view that Tehran should never be allowed to obtain one.“If there’s an agreement to be made, we want that to be made,” Rubio said.He said there has been “some progress and some interest” in the talks, and that Washington would see “over the next few hours and days” whether further progress could be made.Rubio said the United States would give diplomacy “every chance to succeed,” but added that Trump had other options available if negotiations failed.

US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said the US had imposed a world-class blockade on Iranian ports, preventing goods from entering or leaving and badly hurting Iran’s economy. He added that intel reports show that Iran’s economy is hurting big time.

US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said on Wednesday that Washington is prepared to return to military action if negotiations with Iran fail to ensure that the Islamic Republic never acquires a nuclear weapon. Speaking at a White House Cabinet meeting, Hegseth said President Donald Trump had created the conditions to protect Americans and the wider world from what he called a generational threat from Iran. “There’s only one man over the course of both presidencies who has stood up and said they will never get a nuclear weapon,” Hegseth said, referring to Trump. ‘US avoided old approach of Iraq and Afghanistan wars’ Hegseth cited the killing of Qasem Soleimani, withdrawal from the Obama-era nuclear deal, the 12-day war and subsequent US military operations against Iran as part of a broader pressure campaign aimed at stopping Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. He said the US had avoided the “old approach” of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Also Read: US to pull back forces from Iran’s vicinity, lift naval blockade, claims Iran’s state media “Instead, you said, we’re going to do this smart. We’re going to do it overwhelming. We’re going to use maximum lethality. And we’re going to bring them to their knees,” Hegseth said, referring to Trump. He said Iran’s navy was “at the bottom of the Persian Gulf” and that its air force, air defences and defence industrial base had been heavily damaged. “They may have missiles, but they can’t build more right now. And they can’t build more drones right now. And they can’t build more ships,” he said. Hegseth said it was those losses that made Tehran come to talks with US envoys, including Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner and Vice President JD Vance. Also Read: Trump’s push for Muslim nations to join Abraham Accords puts Pakistan in a fix ‘US imposed a world-class blockade, their economy is hurting big time’ Hegseth further said that the US had imposed a “world-class blockade” on Iranian ports, preventing goods from entering or leaving and badly hurting Iran’s economy. “We know from the intel that their economy is hurting big time because that is their lifeblood,” he said. The US defence secretary added that Washington had expanded pressure on Iran’s shadow tanker fleet. “No Iranian tanker around the globe is safe,” he said, pointing to seizures that he said had further choked off Tehran’s economic lifeline. Hegseth added that the goal remained to ensure Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon, either through negotiations or, if necessary, by returning to military action. Also Read: Undeclared chemical weapons from former president Assad-era found in Syria ‘Iran negotiating on fumes, will blow up Oman if…’ Speaking in the cabinet meeting earlier, Trump said that Iran is “negotiating on fumes” and needs to make a deal. Referring to the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said, “Nobody's going to control it. We're going to watch over it. We'll watch over it. But nobody's going to control it. That's part of the negotiation that we have. They would like to control it. Nobody's going to control it. It's international waters. And Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we'll have to blow them up. They understand that. They'll be fine.” ‘Oil will be lower than pre-conflict levels when this ends,’ says Bessent Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that oil prices will be lower than before the Iran war when the conflict ends. “Oil will be lower than pre-conflict levels when this ends,” he said. Also Read: ‘Skill, chance irrelevant if money staked’: SC upholds retrospective 28% GST levy on online gaming companies ‘Iran is never going to have a nuclear weapon’: Rubio US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said President Donald Trump prefers a negotiated diplomatic path with Iran and that talks have made some progress, but warned that Washington has other options if diplomacy fails. “The bottom line is Iran is never going to have a nuclear weapon,” Rubio said, adding that the recent events had reinforced Washington’s view that Tehran should never be allowed to obtain one. “If there’s an agreement to be made, we want that to be made,” Rubio said. He said there has been “some progress and some interest” in the talks, and that Washington would see “over the next few hours and days” whether further progress could be made. Rubio said the United States would give diplomacy “every chance to succeed,” but added that Trump had other options available if negotiations failed.

US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said the US had imposed a world-class blockade on Iranian ports, preventing goods from entering or leaving and badly hurting Iran’s economy. He added that intel reports show that Iran’s economy is hurting big time.

US ready to resume military action if Iran peace negotiations fail, says Pete Hegseth

Pete Hegseth defends a proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget during testimony before Congress, arguing it is necessary to strengthen military readiness, modernization, and global deterrence. Lawmakers debate rising defense spending amid fiscal concerns and geopolitical tensions.

Pete Hegseth Justifies $1.5 Trillion Budget to Congress

pete-hegseth

Pete Hegseth, News on Pete Hegseth, stories on Pete Hegseth, articles on Pete Hegseth, Pete Hegseth stories at Wion, Pete Hegseth news, Pete Hegseth latest news

pete hegseth

US hiding troop deaths in Iran war? Toll higher than Pentagon count, claims report

Pentagon revives mandatory testosterone testing for male troops aged 30+

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie moves to remove US war secretary Pete Hegseth

Fit and impeccable? Pentagon sets standards for Pete Hegseth's speech attendees

Is midterms-bound Trump ending Iran war? Hegseth extends troops plan but…

GOP Senator calls on Trump to fire Hegseth amid military leadership shake-up

‘This is real’: Hegseth’s post on Canadian military woman sparks controversy

US army secretary Dan Driscoll resigns from White House

Hegseth to meet top military leaders again at Quantico? Here’s what report says

Dan Driscoll to leave US Army secretary post amid tension with Hegseth: Report

Hegseth under fire as wife's Pentagon role adds to war leadership questions

‘She has no role’: Why Hegseth’s wife attended Pentagon talks on Ukraine

U.S. Leads New Anti-Cartel Bloc, as Hegseth Vows 'ISIS-Style' Ops Against Cartels

Donald Trump Reportedly Clashed with Pete Hegseth Over the Shortage of Munitions

Pentagon Under Fire Over Iran War Casualty Records | Trump Administration Faces Backlash

Can testosterone levels measure military readiness?

U.S. Military introduces testosterone testing for troops over 30 | Pentagon's new health policy

High-T Department of War: Hegseth mandates testosterone screening for US troops

War clouds loom over Iran once again as Trump says MoU 'over', oil prices rise

'Last soldier out of Afghanistan' latest casualty of Hegseth's Pentagon purge

NATO needs to revamp, do more to meet commitments, says Hegseth in Brussels

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Makes Important Announcement In Brussels

‘When will Europe act?’: Hegseth urges action against migrant ‘invasion’

Hegseth's Softer Tone on China Part of Broader Shift in US Policy?

Hegseth: US Seeks Stable, Respectful Relations With China; Flags China's Military Expansion

'Critical anchor': Hegseth lauds India, calls it a pillar of regional stability