Navratri 2026: 9 days, 9 forms of Goddess Durga and 9 colours- Check the complete list

Russian woman and Bihar boy's love story goes viral after she reaches India to marry him

Arijit Singh 9-city India stadium tour to start from January: Check venue and ticket prices

F1 set to return to Africa for first time since 1993 

'Don't ever mess with nature!': Trump’s tiger attack post triggers social media backlash as victim's family issues heartbreaking tribute

US judge blocks Trump administration sanctions on human rights groups supporting Gaza war crimes investigation

Washington calls for 'de-escalation' as Ethiopia-Eritrea tensions fuel war fears

Which jobs are safest from humanoid robots?

US midterms: Trump rallies behind Husted as Brown mounts challenge in crucial Ohio race

US police foil alleged mass shooting plot targeting Illinois Hindu temple during Navratri; 19-year-old’s manifesto called Indians ‘subhumans’

‘Rise up, young patriots!’: American singer Mary Millben says US donors funding CJP, backs Modi govt

Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay calls on US to 'get back to' being defender of human rights

Iran war: Will Trump, Netanyahu escalate conflict ahead of crucial elections? | Race to Power

Who is Abu Dhabi royal Mahrah Al Nahyan, found unconscious on London street with toddler after cocaine use

Iranian woman, 23, handed death sentence for ‘blasphemy’ in social media post; appeals for help

'Turn approver, resign, we'll forgive you': Rahul Gandhi claims receiving messages from CEC Gyanesh Kumar

'Leakers should be shot': Trump rages over leak of US military plans to attack Iran, slams media

Somaliland celebrates after Trump calls it 'a totally different country', raise hopes of US recognition

Bangladesh man killed after mob storms hospital, drags him away over blasphemy allegations

‘My president, I mean my husband’: Trump's new press secretary Katie Zacharia's first briefing goes off the rails in 14 minutes

Mars is not for man: Human heart is too weak to survive the trip, study shows

Sheikh Hasina warns of 'deep sense of insecurity' among Bangladesh's minorities in Durga Puja message

FBI refutes media report claiming Kash Patel is in Russia for talks, says he is in Virginia

'Ouch!!! That must hurt': Kangana Ranaut hails Kamal Haasan's sharp reply to Elon Musk over Starlink row

Girl 'dead' for 8 hours wakes up at her own funeral, dad insists she wasn't breathing

New OTT releases this week (October 12-18, 2026): Sacrifice, Koffee with Karan S9, Roadies Rebirth- 6 titles coming on Netflix, JioHotstar and more

Did the US withhold missile warnings? Ukraine questions Washington's 'bad weather' explanation after Russian strikes kill six, cut power to 600,000

US Singer Mary Millben alleges foreign funding for CJP, warns against anti-Modi forces: All you need to know

Global energy crisis hits Indian economy 

Hidden video recording device found on Australian Navy ship amid claims of secret filming

'White supremacist' terror plot against Illinois Hindu temple foiled by jammed gun: Who is Alexandros Paporakis?

Zelensky feels betrayed by Trump, urges Musk to restore Starlink in Ukraine; Musk responds

'Girls are uncomfortable': Salman Khan calls out paparazzi for bad angles, speaks on PR on Koffee With Karan

After flydubai co-pilot attack, Air France bans Pakistani, Muslim-majority crew on Israel flights

US midterms 2026: Trump under election watch? Democrats deploy 100 observers across nine states

Chinese electric vehicle (EV) giant BYD has overtaken Tesla in battery-electric vehicle (BEV) sales in Europe for the first time, marking a key turning point in the region’s EV landscape, according to market researcher JATO Dynamics.&nbsp;In April 2025, BYD registered 7,231 BEVs across 28 European countries, registering an increase of 169 per cent from the same month last year. Tesla, once the dominant EV force in Europe, registered 7,165 units, a steep decline of 49 per cent year-on-year. Though the margin between the two is narrow, analysts say the implications are far-reaching.&nbsp;The development comes amid broader growth in Europe’s EV sector, with BEV registrations rising 28 per cent in April. Volkswagen led that surge with a 61 per cent jump in EV sales, while its Skoda brand more than tripled EV registrations. BMW, Renault, Audi, and Kia also posted gains. In contrast, aside from Tesla, Volvo and Mercedes recorded declining numbers.&nbsp;BYD expands despite tariffs&nbsp;BYD’s rapid rise in Europe has been bolstered by a strategic pivot toward plug-in hybrids in response to new European Union (EU) tariffs on China-made BEVs. Including plug-in hybrids, BYD's total registrations soared 359 per cent in April, positioning it ahead of legacy automakers like Fiat and Seat in markets such as France.&nbsp;The tariffs—17 per cent for BYD compared to just 7.8 per cent for Tesla’s made-in-China cars—were intended to curb the influence of Chinese EV brands amid accusations of unfair trade practices. However, BYD has managed to offset the impact by diversifying its product lineup and offering competitive pricing. Hybrid vehicles, not subject to the same tariffs, have also proven key to this growth.&nbsp;Despite these trade hurdles, Chinese EV brands collectively saw a 59 per cent increase in European registrations in April. Tesla, on the other hand, continued its downward trend. In the first quarter of 2025, Tesla posted a 71 per cent drop in net income, and its sales have slumped each month this year—down 36 per cent in March, 47 per cent in February, and 50 per cent in January.&nbsp;Observers cite multiple factors for Tesla’s struggles, including limited model updates and CEO Elon Musk’s controversial political affiliations. His close ties to the Trump administration and public controversies have drawn protests in Europe and alienated consumers in a region known for its progressive policies.&nbsp;The road ahead&nbsp;BYD’s momentum is expected to continue as it prepares to open a manufacturing plant in Hungary, its first in Europe. Meanwhile, Tesla is working to expand its Berlin gigafactory in a bid to recapture market share.&nbsp;JATO Dynamics noted that although Tesla remains a significant global EV player, BYD’s expansion and local manufacturing plans put it in a strong position to challenge for dominance in key international markets.&nbsp;With the European EV market heating up, industry watchers say this rivalry is only just beginning—and it’s no longer guaranteed that Tesla will lead the charge.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

Tesla, once the dominant EV force in Europe, registered a steep decline of 49 per cent year-on-year. Though the margin between the two is narrow, analysts say the implications are far-reaching.

Chinese electric vehicle (EV) giant BYD has overtaken Tesla in battery-electric vehicle (BEV) sales in Europe for the first time, marking a key turning point in the region’s EV landscape, according to market researcher JATO Dynamics. In April 2025, BYD registered 7,231 BEVs across 28 European countries, registering an increase of 169 per cent from the same month last year. Tesla, once the dominant EV force in Europe, registered 7,165 units, a steep decline of 49 per cent year-on-year. Though the margin between the two is narrow, analysts say the implications are far-reaching. The development comes amid broader growth in Europe’s EV sector, with BEV registrations rising 28 per cent in April. Volkswagen led that surge with a 61 per cent jump in EV sales, while its Skoda brand more than tripled EV registrations. BMW, Renault, Audi, and Kia also posted gains. In contrast, aside from Tesla, Volvo and Mercedes recorded declining numbers. BYD expands despite tariffs BYD’s rapid rise in Europe has been bolstered by a strategic pivot toward plug-in hybrids in response to new European Union (EU) tariffs on China-made BEVs. Including plug-in hybrids, BYD's total registrations soared 359 per cent in April, positioning it ahead of legacy automakers like Fiat and Seat in markets such as France. The tariffs—17 per cent for BYD compared to just 7.8 per cent for Tesla’s made-in-China cars—were intended to curb the influence of Chinese EV brands amid accusations of unfair trade practices. However, BYD has managed to offset the impact by diversifying its product lineup and offering competitive pricing. Hybrid vehicles, not subject to the same tariffs, have also proven key to this growth. Despite these trade hurdles, Chinese EV brands collectively saw a 59 per cent increase in European registrations in April. Tesla, on the other hand, continued its downward trend. In the first quarter of 2025, Tesla posted a 71 per cent drop in net income, and its sales have slumped each month this year—down 36 per cent in March, 47 per cent in February, and 50 per cent in January. Observers cite multiple factors for Tesla’s struggles, including limited model updates and CEO Elon Musk’s controversial political affiliations. His close ties to the Trump administration and public controversies have drawn protests in Europe and alienated consumers in a region known for its progressive policies. The road ahead BYD’s momentum is expected to continue as it prepares to open a manufacturing plant in Hungary, its first in Europe. Meanwhile, Tesla is working to expand its Berlin gigafactory in a bid to recapture market share. JATO Dynamics noted that although Tesla remains a significant global EV player, BYD’s expansion and local manufacturing plans put it in a strong position to challenge for dominance in key international markets. With the European EV market heating up, industry watchers say this rivalry is only just beginning—and it’s no longer guaranteed that Tesla will lead the charge. (With inputs from agencies)

Tesla, once the dominant EV force in Europe, registered a steep decline of 49 per cent year-on-year. Though the margin between the two is narrow, analysts say the implications are far-reaching.

BYD overtakes Tesla in Europe EV sales for the first time

India is set to surpass China as the primary driver of global oil demand growth over the next decade, according to a new report by Moody’s Ratings. The shift comes as China approaches peak crude consumption, driven by slower economic growth and accelerated adoption of new energy vehicles (NEVs), while India continues to experience robust energy demand growth supported by economic expansion and infrastructure development.Moody’s projects India’s crude oil consumption to grow annually at 3-5 per cent over the next 3-5 years, compared to China’s marginal growth during the same period. China’s oil demand is expected to peak at around 800 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) by 2030, while India’s demand trajectory remains upward, underscoring a significant transformation in global energy dynamics.&nbsp;What is fuelling India’s demand?&nbsp;India, currently the world’s third-largest oil consumer behind the United States and China, is planning a major expansion of its refining capacity to meet rising domestic fuel demand. Refining capacity is projected to increase by 20 per cent to 309.5 mtpa by 2030 from 256.8 mtpa as of April 2024, driven by investments from state-owned oil marketing companies such as Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.Rising industrialisation, rapid urbanisation, and massive government-led infrastructure investments are expected to boost transportation fuel demand, particularly for petrol and diesel. At the same time, demand for petrochemical products will also rise in tandem with broader economic development.In contrast, China’s refining capacity is nearing a state-imposed cap of 1 billion tonnes, curbing further growth potential. With the country’s pivot toward cleaner energy sources, including solar, wind, and electric vehicles, consumption of traditional fuels like gasoline and diesel is set to decline, although demand for jet fuel and naphtha may still grow due to rising air travel and chemical production.&nbsp;India’s import dependence to rise&nbsp;Despite its growing consumption, India’s domestic oil and gas production remains a weak link. Moody’s warns that if India cannot reverse its declining output from ageing oil fields and limited exploration investment, its reliance on imports will rise further. Currently, India imports nearly 90 per cent of its crude oil and around 50 per cent of its natural gas requirements, raising concerns about long-term energy security.In contrast, China, which imports over 70 per cent of its crude and 35–40 per cent of its gas needs, is actively working to reduce import dependency through heavy investment in domestic shale gas and offshore exploration projects. As a result, Chinese national oil companies (NOCs) are expected to outperform their Indian peers in production growth over the next 3-5 years.Chinese NOCs also benefit from greater vertical integration, which Moody’s says reduces earnings volatility, along with stronger financial metrics such as lower leverage and higher interest coverage. In India, weaker integration, ageing infrastructure, and policy-related earnings swings have made national firms more vulnerable.&nbsp;Green energy transition&nbsp;Moody’s report highlights a significant policy divergence between the two Asian giants. China’s energy policies are more market-oriented and focused on enhancing self-sufficiency, while India’s regulatory framework still heavily influences fuel prices, often leading to volatile earnings for Indian NOCs.Additionally, India relies more on taxes and dividends from its petroleum sector to fund its fiscal deficit, increasing political sensitivity around fuel prices.Environmental policies are also advancing at different speeds. Chinese NOCs are under greater regulatory pressure to transition to greener practices, while India’s carbon regulations are still evolving. This means Indian firms currently face less immediate pressure to invest in low-carbon technologies, though such pressures are likely to grow in the coming years as global climate commitments intensify.Meanwhile, India is pushing to increase the share of natural gas in its energy mix from 6 to 15 per cent by 2030. Gas is seen as a critical transition fuel, particularly for sectors like fertilisers and petrochemicals, and for urban energy use via piped and compressed natural gas.Gas demand in India is expected to grow by 4-7 per cent annually through the decade, outpacing China’s gas demand growth rate. However, challenges remain in improving domestic gas infrastructure and maintaining affordability, especially against the backdrop of rapidly falling renewable energy prices.As China transitions toward a lower-carbon, more self-sufficient energy economy, India’s growing appetite for oil and gas places it at the centre of global energy markets. However, India’s growing dependence on imports and lag in domestic production pose risks to its energy security and economic stability.While India is set to be the engine of global oil demand growth, its long-term sustainability will depend on policy reforms, infrastructure development, and investments in domestic exploration and green energy.According to Moody’s, the ability of Indian NOCs to execute production plans and manage volatility will be crucial in determining the country’s success in navigating the next decade of energy transition.

The shift comes as China approaches peak crude consumption, driven by slower economic growth and accelerated adoption of new energy vehicles, while India continues to experience robust energy demand growth supported by economic expansion and infrastructure development.

India is set to surpass China as the primary driver of global oil demand growth over the next decade, according to a new report by Moody’s Ratings. The shift comes as China approaches peak crude consumption, driven by slower economic growth and accelerated adoption of new energy vehicles (NEVs), while India continues to experience robust energy demand growth supported by economic expansion and infrastructure development. Moody’s projects India’s crude oil consumption to grow annually at 3-5 per cent over the next 3-5 years, compared to China’s marginal growth during the same period. China’s oil demand is expected to peak at around 800 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) by 2030, while India’s demand trajectory remains upward, underscoring a significant transformation in global energy dynamics. What is fuelling India’s demand? India, currently the world’s third-largest oil consumer behind the United States and China, is planning a major expansion of its refining capacity to meet rising domestic fuel demand. Refining capacity is projected to increase by 20 per cent to 309.5 mtpa by 2030 from 256.8 mtpa as of April 2024, driven by investments from state-owned oil marketing companies such as Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Rising industrialisation, rapid urbanisation, and massive government-led infrastructure investments are expected to boost transportation fuel demand, particularly for petrol and diesel. At the same time, demand for petrochemical products will also rise in tandem with broader economic development. In contrast, China’s refining capacity is nearing a state-imposed cap of 1 billion tonnes, curbing further growth potential. With the country’s pivot toward cleaner energy sources, including solar, wind, and electric vehicles, consumption of traditional fuels like gasoline and diesel is set to decline, although demand for jet fuel and naphtha may still grow due to rising air travel and chemical production. India’s import dependence to rise Despite its growing consumption, India’s domestic oil and gas production remains a weak link. Moody’s warns that if India cannot reverse its declining output from ageing oil fields and limited exploration investment, its reliance on imports will rise further. Currently, India imports nearly 90 per cent of its crude oil and around 50 per cent of its natural gas requirements, raising concerns about long-term energy security. In contrast, China, which imports over 70 per cent of its crude and 35–40 per cent of its gas needs, is actively working to reduce import dependency through heavy investment in domestic shale gas and offshore exploration projects. As a result, Chinese national oil companies (NOCs) are expected to outperform their Indian peers in production growth over the next 3-5 years. Chinese NOCs also benefit from greater vertical integration, which Moody’s says reduces earnings volatility, along with stronger financial metrics such as lower leverage and higher interest coverage. In India, weaker integration, ageing infrastructure, and policy-related earnings swings have made national firms more vulnerable. Green energy transition Moody’s report highlights a significant policy divergence between the two Asian giants. China’s energy policies are more market-oriented and focused on enhancing self-sufficiency, while India’s regulatory framework still heavily influences fuel prices, often leading to volatile earnings for Indian NOCs. Additionally, India relies more on taxes and dividends from its petroleum sector to fund its fiscal deficit, increasing political sensitivity around fuel prices. Environmental policies are also advancing at different speeds. Chinese NOCs are under greater regulatory pressure to transition to greener practices, while India’s carbon regulations are still evolving. This means Indian firms currently face less immediate pressure to invest in low-carbon technologies, though such pressures are likely to grow in the coming years as global climate commitments intensify. Meanwhile, India is pushing to increase the share of natural gas in its energy mix from 6 to 15 per cent by 2030. Gas is seen as a critical transition fuel, particularly for sectors like fertilisers and petrochemicals, and for urban energy use via piped and compressed natural gas. Gas demand in India is expected to grow by 4-7 per cent annually through the decade, outpacing China’s gas demand growth rate. However, challenges remain in improving domestic gas infrastructure and maintaining affordability, especially against the backdrop of rapidly falling renewable energy prices. As China transitions toward a lower-carbon, more self-sufficient energy economy, India’s growing appetite for oil and gas places it at the centre of global energy markets. However, India’s growing dependence on imports and lag in domestic production pose risks to its energy security and economic stability. While India is set to be the engine of global oil demand growth, its long-term sustainability will depend on policy reforms, infrastructure development, and investments in domestic exploration and green energy. According to Moody’s, the ability of Indian NOCs to execute production plans and manage volatility will be crucial in determining the country’s success in navigating the next decade of energy transition.

The shift comes as China approaches peak crude consumption, driven by slower economic growth and accelerated adoption of new energy vehicles, while India continues to experience robust energy demand growth supported by economic expansion and infrastructure development.

India to drive global oil demand growth as China nears peak: Moody’s

Japan’s core inflation accelerated to 3.5 per cent year-on-year in April, the fastest pace in over two years, propelled by a dramatic rise in food prices, particularly rice, and sustained energy costs, according to the official data released on May 23.The figure, which excludes volatile fresh food prices but includes energy, surpassed market expectations of a 3.4 per cent gain and intensified speculation that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) could raise interest rates again before year-end.The sharp price increase highlights the ongoing challenge for the BOJ in balancing inflation control with economic growth, especially amid mounting trade uncertainties tied to US President Donald Trump’s tariff measures.Japan’s central bank has held its main rate steady at 0.5 per cent since ending its decade-long ultra-loose monetary policy in January, but signs of persistent inflation are strengthening calls for further tightening.&nbsp;Rice prices trigger political fallout&nbsp;Driving much of April’s inflation was an eye-popping 98.4 per cent year-on-year spike in rice prices—the steepest since records began in 1971—contributing to overall food inflation of 6.5 per cent. The rise has stirred public discontent and added pressure on Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s administration, which is already facing sagging approval ratings and a looming election test in July.The crisis deepened earlier this week when Agriculture Minister Taku Eto resigned following a controversial remark that he never bought rice due to frequent donations from supporters. The gaffe sparked widespread backlash, leading Ishiba to publicly apologise and pledge to reduce rice prices to below ¥4,000 ($28) per 5-kilogram. As of mid-May, prices had soared to ¥4,268 on average in major supermarkets.The government is now drawing from emergency rice reserves and considering stimulus measures, including a potential return of subsidies on electricity and gas bills phased out in March. Energy prices jumped 9.3 per cent in April, compounding the inflationary burden on households.&nbsp;Rate hike in sight&nbsp;The acceleration in core inflation—above the BOJ’s 2 per cent target for over three years—has renewed pressure on the central bank to act. Another gauge that excludes both fresh food and energy and is closely watched as an indicator of demand-driven inflation rose to 3 per cent in April from 2.9 per cent in March.The BOJ remains cautious. In its early May meeting, it kept rates unchanged and flagged heightened global uncertainty from Trump’s tariff regime. Japan faces a looming July deadline to respond to a new 24 per cent reciprocal tariff, in addition to a baseline 10 per cent duty and an ongoing 25 per cent levy on cars and metals. Trade talks in Washington continue, but negotiations remain deadlocked.Economists warn that while inflation is rising, Japan’s economic foundation remains fragile. The economy contracted in Q1 due to weak consumer spending and lacklustre exports, and real wages have declined for three consecutive months despite wage increases.With inflation eating into household purchasing power and political tensions rising, policymakers must navigate a delicate path.The BOJ’s next policy meeting is scheduled for June 16–17, where markets will watch closely for any shift in tone as Japan attempts to manage its highest inflation in over two years amidst a volatile global backdrop.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

The sharp price increase highlights the ongoing challenge for the BOJ in balancing inflation control with economic growth, especially amid mounting trade uncertainties tied to US President Donald Trump’s tariff measures.

Japan’s core inflation accelerated to 3.5 per cent year-on-year in April, the fastest pace in over two years, propelled by a dramatic rise in food prices, particularly rice, and sustained energy costs, according to the official data released on May 23. The figure, which excludes volatile fresh food prices but includes energy, surpassed market expectations of a 3.4 per cent gain and intensified speculation that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) could raise interest rates again before year-end. The sharp price increase highlights the ongoing challenge for the BOJ in balancing inflation control with economic growth, especially amid mounting trade uncertainties tied to US President Donald Trump’s tariff measures. Japan’s central bank has held its main rate steady at 0.5 per cent since ending its decade-long ultra-loose monetary policy in January, but signs of persistent inflation are strengthening calls for further tightening. Rice prices trigger political fallout Driving much of April’s inflation was an eye-popping 98.4 per cent year-on-year spike in rice prices—the steepest since records began in 1971—contributing to overall food inflation of 6.5 per cent. The rise has stirred public discontent and added pressure on Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s administration, which is already facing sagging approval ratings and a looming election test in July. The crisis deepened earlier this week when Agriculture Minister Taku Eto resigned following a controversial remark that he never bought rice due to frequent donations from supporters. The gaffe sparked widespread backlash, leading Ishiba to publicly apologise and pledge to reduce rice prices to below ¥4,000 ($28) per 5-kilogram. As of mid-May, prices had soared to ¥4,268 on average in major supermarkets. The government is now drawing from emergency rice reserves and considering stimulus measures, including a potential return of subsidies on electricity and gas bills phased out in March. Energy prices jumped 9.3 per cent in April, compounding the inflationary burden on households. Rate hike in sight The acceleration in core inflation—above the BOJ’s 2 per cent target for over three years—has renewed pressure on the central bank to act. Another gauge that excludes both fresh food and energy and is closely watched as an indicator of demand-driven inflation rose to 3 per cent in April from 2.9 per cent in March. The BOJ remains cautious. In its early May meeting, it kept rates unchanged and flagged heightened global uncertainty from Trump’s tariff regime. Japan faces a looming July deadline to respond to a new 24 per cent reciprocal tariff, in addition to a baseline 10 per cent duty and an ongoing 25 per cent levy on cars and metals. Trade talks in Washington continue, but negotiations remain deadlocked. Economists warn that while inflation is rising, Japan’s economic foundation remains fragile. The economy contracted in Q1 due to weak consumer spending and lacklustre exports, and real wages have declined for three consecutive months despite wage increases. With inflation eating into household purchasing power and political tensions rising, policymakers must navigate a delicate path. The BOJ’s next policy meeting is scheduled for June 16–17, where markets will watch closely for any shift in tone as Japan attempts to manage its highest inflation in over two years amidst a volatile global backdrop. (With inputs from agencies)

The sharp price increase highlights the ongoing challenge for the BOJ in balancing inflation control with economic growth, especially amid mounting trade uncertainties tied to US President Donald Trump’s tariff measures.

Japan's inflation surges to 3.5% in April amid soaring rice prices and trade tensions

Urban India isn’t cooking, it’s ordering. Whether it’s stacked burgers or millet bowls, city dwellers are increasingly trading in their chapati dinners for convenience cuisine.&nbsp; &nbsp;According to a new Deloitte-FICCI report, nearly 50 per cent of urban consumers’ food budgets now go toward prepared foods, dining out, and deliveries, a striking reflection of how deeply lifestyle, income, and convenience are reshaping the nation’s foodscape.<h2>What the Deloitte-FICCI report highlights</h2>The report doesn’t just capture a passing trend; it paints a picture of a profound economic shift. With rising incomes and accelerating urbanisation, the average Indian consumer regardless of income bracket and is choosing more varied, processed, and protein-rich diets over traditional staples.&nbsp;“Consumers across income groups are moving beyond traditional staples toward more varied, protein-rich, processed diets,” the report states, signalling a future were convenience trumps custom. &nbsp;One of the most notable shifts is the emergence of premiumisation. Higher-income groups are no longer settling for basics they’re actively seeking better quality, indulgent, and health-conscious foods, even if that means shelling out more for it. But this appetite for innovation isn’t restricted to metros.&nbsp;Rural India, too, is undergoing a quiet food revolution. Since the early 2000s, rural spending on core staples like cereals, vegetables, and pulses has seen a steady decline.&nbsp;&nbsp;For the first time, expenditure on beverages and processed foods in rural households has overtaken that on cereals. This pivot is largely fuelled by smaller, affordable SKUs and better market penetration by food companies.&nbsp;“As rural prosperity increases, consumer behaviours are converging,” said Anand Ramanathan, Partner and Consumer Industry Leader, Deloitte South Asia. “Tier 2, Tier 3 cities and beyond are emerging as key growth powerhouses.”&nbsp;The report points to a massive, untapped opportunity for India’s food processing sector, noting that with 52 per cent of India’s land area suitable for agriculture, the sector is poised for a boom.&nbsp;<h2>Health is the new hunger</h2>&nbsp;Wellness is no longer a niche, it’s mainstream. According to the Deloitte-FICCI report, urban consumers are actively seeking high-protein, low-sugar, gut-friendly, and organic food options.&nbsp; Traditional Indian superfoods like millets and makhana have made a comeback, celebrated for their nutritional punch and cultural resonance. “The urban youth population is increasingly becoming health-conscious and shifting towards millet consumption,” the report notes. This trend has sparked the rise of start-ups focused on millet-based snacks, breakfast options, and beverages, and it’s not slowing down anytime soon. Clean eating is becoming a priority for the urban Indian. The survey found that over 90 per cent of consumers consider clean labels — products made with minimal, natural, and recognisable ingredients — important while making food purchases. Nearly 31 per cent of these consumers are even willing to pay over 10 per cent more for items that carry organic or natural claims. This has given rise to functional foods, with growing adoption of products enriched with probiotics, prebiotics, and other nutritional fortifications. From gut-friendly yoghurts to fortified juices and superfood bars, the market is expanding rapidly. Start-ups and global brands are reformulating traditional products for Indian palates while enhancing their health benefits.&nbsp;“As India moves towards a $5 trillion GDP by FY28 and aims to become a developed country by 2047, a larger and more affluent consumer base will demand better, safer and more convenient food options,” the report adds.<h2>Dining out surge post-pandemic &nbsp;</h2>India’s restaurant sector may have taken a hit during the pandemic, but it’s bouncing back with force. The India Food Services Report 2024 by the National Restaurant Association of India (NRAI) shows just how robust this rebound is.&nbsp;The sector is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.1 per cent, reaching ₹7.76 trillion by FY28. The organised food services segment, which includes dine-in restaurants, cloud kitchens, and QSRs is projected to grow even faster at 13.2 per cent CAGR, capturing over 52.9 per cent of the total market share by the same period.&nbsp;&nbsp;As of now, the food services industry employs around 8.5 million people, a number forecast to surpass 10.3 million by FY28.&nbsp;The reasons behind this boom are multifaceted. The rise of quick-commerce platforms delivering everything from restaurant meals to gourmet snacks in under 30 minutes has reportedly made dining out (or in) easier than ever. Additionally, a young, aspirational population is increasingly dining out not just for sustenance but for social capital and lifestyle.&nbsp;&nbsp;This demand is not limited to metros; tier 2 and 3 cities are emerging as hotbeds of dining culture, driven by better infrastructure, rising incomes, and a desire to emulate urban habits.

The report doesn’t just capture a passing trend; it paints a picture of a profound economic shift. With rising incomes and accelerating urbanisation, the average Indian consumer regardless of income bracket and is choosing more varied, processed, and protein-rich diets over traditional staples.

Urban India isn’t cooking, it’s ordering. Whether it’s stacked burgers or millet bowls, city dwellers are increasingly trading in their chapati dinners for convenience cuisine. According to a new Deloitte-FICCI report, nearly 50 per cent of urban consumers’ food budgets now go toward prepared foods, dining out, and deliveries, a striking reflection of how deeply lifestyle, income, and convenience are reshaping the nation’s foodscape. What the Deloitte-FICCI report highlights The report doesn’t just capture a passing trend; it paints a picture of a profound economic shift. With rising incomes and accelerating urbanisation, the average Indian consumer regardless of income bracket and is choosing more varied, processed, and protein-rich diets over traditional staples. “Consumers across income groups are moving beyond traditional staples toward more varied, protein-rich, processed diets,” the report states, signalling a future were convenience trumps custom. One of the most notable shifts is the emergence of premiumisation. Higher-income groups are no longer settling for basics they’re actively seeking better quality, indulgent, and health-conscious foods, even if that means shelling out more for it. But this appetite for innovation isn’t restricted to metros. Rural India, too, is undergoing a quiet food revolution. Since the early 2000s, rural spending on core staples like cereals, vegetables, and pulses has seen a steady decline. For the first time, expenditure on beverages and processed foods in rural households has overtaken that on cereals. This pivot is largely fuelled by smaller, affordable SKUs and better market penetration by food companies. “As rural prosperity increases, consumer behaviours are converging,” said Anand Ramanathan, Partner and Consumer Industry Leader, Deloitte South Asia. “Tier 2, Tier 3 cities and beyond are emerging as key growth powerhouses.” The report points to a massive, untapped opportunity for India’s food processing sector, noting that with 52 per cent of India’s land area suitable for agriculture, the sector is poised for a boom. Health is the new hunger Wellness is no longer a niche, it’s mainstream. According to the Deloitte-FICCI report, urban consumers are actively seeking high-protein, low-sugar, gut-friendly, and organic food options. Traditional Indian superfoods like millets and makhana have made a comeback, celebrated for their nutritional punch and cultural resonance. “The urban youth population is increasingly becoming health-conscious and shifting towards millet consumption,” the report notes. This trend has sparked the rise of start-ups focused on millet-based snacks, breakfast options, and beverages, and it’s not slowing down anytime soon. Clean eating is becoming a priority for the urban Indian. The survey found that over 90 per cent of consumers consider clean labels — products made with minimal, natural, and recognisable ingredients — important while making food purchases. Nearly 31 per cent of these consumers are even willing to pay over 10 per cent more for items that carry organic or natural claims. This has given rise to functional foods, with growing adoption of products enriched with probiotics, prebiotics, and other nutritional fortifications. From gut-friendly yoghurts to fortified juices and superfood bars, the market is expanding rapidly. Start-ups and global brands are reformulating traditional products for Indian palates while enhancing their health benefits. “As India moves towards a $5 trillion GDP by FY28 and aims to become a developed country by 2047, a larger and more affluent consumer base will demand better, safer and more convenient food options,” the report adds. Dining out surge post-pandemic India’s restaurant sector may have taken a hit during the pandemic, but it’s bouncing back with force. The India Food Services Report 2024 by the National Restaurant Association of India (NRAI) shows just how robust this rebound is. The sector is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.1 per cent, reaching ₹7.76 trillion by FY28. The organised food services segment, which includes dine-in restaurants, cloud kitchens, and QSRs is projected to grow even faster at 13.2 per cent CAGR, capturing over 52.9 per cent of the total market share by the same period. As of now, the food services industry employs around 8.5 million people, a number forecast to surpass 10.3 million by FY28. The reasons behind this boom are multifaceted. The rise of quick-commerce platforms delivering everything from restaurant meals to gourmet snacks in under 30 minutes has reportedly made dining out (or in) easier than ever. Additionally, a young, aspirational population is increasingly dining out not just for sustenance but for social capital and lifestyle. This demand is not limited to metros; tier 2 and 3 cities are emerging as hotbeds of dining culture, driven by better infrastructure, rising incomes, and a desire to emulate urban habits.

Deloitte-FICCI report reveals shocking details about Urban Indians choices. The report reveals nearly 50 per cent of urban consumers’ food budgets now go toward prepared foods, dining out, and deliveries.&nbsp;

Urban Indians now spend half their food budget outside the home highlights Deloitte FICCI report

In a major move to expand its footprint in the global premium motorcycle segment, Bajaj Auto Ltd announced plans on May 22 to acquire a controlling stake in Austrian motorcycle maker KTM AG. The deal, subject to regulatory clearances, will see Bajaj shift from a dormant minority stakeholder to the majority owner of KTM through its Netherlands-based subsidiary, Bajaj Auto International Holdings BV (BAIHBV).Bajaj, one of India's leading two-wheeler makers, has outlined a comprehensive €800 million ($903.75 million) funding package to support KTM’s financial restructuring and revival. The funding includes €600 million ($677.82 million) in fresh capital being deployed now, in addition to €200 million ($225.91 million) already infused earlier to address KTM’s urgent liquidity needs.&nbsp;Rescuing a storied brand&nbsp;KTM AG, known for high-performance motorcycle brands such as KTM, Husqvarna, and GASGAS, filed for judicial restructuring in November 2024 due to spiralling debt and operational bottlenecks.On February 25, 2025, its creditors approved a restructuring plan that proposed a one-time payout of 30 per cent of their claims by May 23. Bajaj’s financial support is crucial for meeting this deadline and reviving the company’s stalled operations.The €800 million ($903.75 million) package includes a €450 million ($508.30 million) secured term loan to KTM and €150 million ($169.41 million) in convertible bonds issued by Pierer Bajaj AG (PBAG)—a joint venture between Bajaj and Austrian entrepreneur Stefan Pierer.Bajaj’s BAIHBV currently holds a 49.9 per cent stake in PBAG, which owns 75 per cent of KTM’s listed parent entity, Pierer Mobility AG (PMAG). The deal will enable Bajaj to acquire full control of PBAG, thereby gaining indirect control over KTM.Additionally, BAIHBV has assumed a commitment worth €80 million from Dabepo Holding GmbH to prevent loan foreclosure that could jeopardise KTM’s revival plans.&nbsp;Strategic shift for Bajaj Auto&nbsp;“This twin move of taking ownership (subject to approvals) and paring down debt by providing liquidity at a crucial stage positions Bajaj Auto as a driving force in shaping the future of one of the world’s most admired high-performance motorcycle companies,” the company said in a statement.Bajaj’s involvement with KTM dates back to 2007. Over the years, the partnership has expanded to include joint development, manufacturing, and export of KTM motorcycles from India to over 80 countries. Bajaj Auto currently holds an effective 37.5 per cent stake in KTM via PMAG.Post-deal, Bajaj aims to resume production at KTM’s Austrian facilities after months of stoppage and enhance operations through its established India-based development programmes. Long-time KTM CEO Stefan Pierer is expected to step down as part of the transition.The deal not only marks a significant governance shift but also positions Bajaj Auto to leverage KTM’s global brand equity for wider opportunities in technology innovation and international market expansion.The court is expected to confirm KTM’s restructuring plan by mid-June, following which the creditor payments will be released and legal proceedings concluded. In parallel, Bajaj is seeking approvals from Austria’s Takeover Commission, Foreign Investment Control, and Merger Control Authorities.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

The deal, subject to regulatory clearances, will see Bajaj Auto shift from a dormant minority stakeholder to the majority owner of KTM through its Netherlands-based subsidiary, Bajaj Auto International Holdings BV.

In a major move to expand its footprint in the global premium motorcycle segment, Bajaj Auto Ltd announced plans on May 22 to acquire a controlling stake in Austrian motorcycle maker KTM AG. The deal, subject to regulatory clearances, will see Bajaj shift from a dormant minority stakeholder to the majority owner of KTM through its Netherlands-based subsidiary, Bajaj Auto International Holdings BV (BAIHBV). Bajaj, one of India's leading two-wheeler makers, has outlined a comprehensive €800 million ($903.75 million) funding package to support KTM’s financial restructuring and revival. The funding includes €600 million ($677.82 million) in fresh capital being deployed now, in addition to €200 million ($225.91 million) already infused earlier to address KTM’s urgent liquidity needs. Rescuing a storied brand KTM AG, known for high-performance motorcycle brands such as KTM, Husqvarna, and GASGAS, filed for judicial restructuring in November 2024 due to spiralling debt and operational bottlenecks. On February 25, 2025, its creditors approved a restructuring plan that proposed a one-time payout of 30 per cent of their claims by May 23. Bajaj’s financial support is crucial for meeting this deadline and reviving the company’s stalled operations. The €800 million ($903.75 million) package includes a €450 million ($508.30 million) secured term loan to KTM and €150 million ($169.41 million) in convertible bonds issued by Pierer Bajaj AG (PBAG)—a joint venture between Bajaj and Austrian entrepreneur Stefan Pierer. Bajaj’s BAIHBV currently holds a 49.9 per cent stake in PBAG, which owns 75 per cent of KTM’s listed parent entity, Pierer Mobility AG (PMAG). The deal will enable Bajaj to acquire full control of PBAG, thereby gaining indirect control over KTM. Additionally, BAIHBV has assumed a commitment worth €80 million from Dabepo Holding GmbH to prevent loan foreclosure that could jeopardise KTM’s revival plans. Strategic shift for Bajaj Auto “This twin move of taking ownership (subject to approvals) and paring down debt by providing liquidity at a crucial stage positions Bajaj Auto as a driving force in shaping the future of one of the world’s most admired high-performance motorcycle companies,” the company said in a statement. Bajaj’s involvement with KTM dates back to 2007. Over the years, the partnership has expanded to include joint development, manufacturing, and export of KTM motorcycles from India to over 80 countries. Bajaj Auto currently holds an effective 37.5 per cent stake in KTM via PMAG. Post-deal, Bajaj aims to resume production at KTM’s Austrian facilities after months of stoppage and enhance operations through its established India-based development programmes. Long-time KTM CEO Stefan Pierer is expected to step down as part of the transition. The deal not only marks a significant governance shift but also positions Bajaj Auto to leverage KTM’s global brand equity for wider opportunities in technology innovation and international market expansion. The court is expected to confirm KTM’s restructuring plan by mid-June, following which the creditor payments will be released and legal proceedings concluded. In parallel, Bajaj is seeking approvals from Austria’s Takeover Commission, Foreign Investment Control, and Merger Control Authorities. (With inputs from agencies)

The deal, subject to regulatory clearances, will see Bajaj Auto shift from a dormant minority stakeholder to the majority owner of KTM through its Netherlands-based subsidiary, Bajaj Auto International Holdings BV.

Bajaj Auto to acquire majority stake in KTM with €800 million revival package

In a move that signals a shift in the tech industry’s race to redefine hardware for the artificial intelligence (AI) age, OpenAI has acquired the design-focused hardware startup&nbsp;io, co-founded by former Apple designer Sir Jony Ive, in a deal valued at nearly $6.5 billion.&nbsp;&nbsp;The all-equity acquisition is OpenAI’s largest deal to date and marks the company’s formal entry into consumer hardware, as it seeks to build the next generation of devices purpose-built for an AI-native future.&nbsp;The acquisition, announced on May 22, follows nearly two years of quiet collaboration between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Ive, whose design work at Apple shaped the modern consumer technology landscape through products like the iPhone, iPod, and MacBook. Their shared ambition to reimagine how humans interact with computers has culminated in the creation of&nbsp;io, a startup that aimed to build a “family of products for the AGI (artificial general intelligence) era”—referencing AGI, a theoretical form of AI with human-level capabilities.&nbsp;As part of the deal, OpenAI will absorb io’s 55-person team of engineers, scientists, and manufacturing experts. Ive himself will not become an OpenAI employee but will assume “deep design and creative responsibilities” across both OpenAI and io via his design firm, LoveFrom, which will remain independent.&nbsp;&nbsp;LoveFrom will now become a long-term creative partner for OpenAI, overseeing the design direction of its hardware, apps, and future versions of ChatGPT.&nbsp;Reimagining human-computer interaction&nbsp;“This is an extraordinary moment,” Ive and Altman wrote in a joint statement. “Computers are now seeing, thinking, and understanding. Yet our experience with them remains shaped by traditional products and interfaces. We are on the brink of a new generation of technology.”&nbsp;While exact details about the upcoming hardware remain limited, both Ive and Altman emphasised that the devices under development are intended to break free from the screen-based computing paradigm. Early concepts reportedly include wearable devices like AI-powered glasses or headphones with contextual awareness.&nbsp;&nbsp;Altman said the project aims to “completely reimagine what it means to use a computer,” adding that the leap in AI capabilities now demands new form factors. “AI is such a big leap forward in terms of what people can do that it needs a new kind of computing experience to get the maximum potential out of it,” he stated.&nbsp;The move marks a return to consumer technology for Ive, who left Apple in 2019 after nearly three decades, during which he designed many of the company’s most iconic products in collaboration with Steve Jobs. He later founded LoveFrom, which has worked with Ferrari, Airbnb, and Moncler, and in 2023 launched io, formed under the LoveFrom umbrella, with fellow Apple alumni Scott Cannon, Evans Hankey, and Tang Tan.&nbsp;“I have a growing sense that everything I’ve learned over the last 30 years has led me to this place and to this moment,” Ive said. “It’s a relationship and a way of working together that I think is going to yield products and products and products.”&nbsp;The OpenAI deal also reunites Ive with Hankey, Apple’s former VP of industrial design, and Tan, who led iPhone and Apple Watch hardware engineering until 2024. Both will join OpenAI as part of the io integration.&nbsp;Implications for the tech industry&nbsp;OpenAI’s bold foray into hardware comes at a time when traditional tech giants like Apple, Meta, and Google are all vying to define the next era of AI-infused devices. Apple, once a leader in consumer hardware innovation, has faced criticism for its slower pace in AI integration.&nbsp;&nbsp;By bringing Ive onboard, OpenAI not only gains a world-class design team but also signals its intent to go beyond software and reshape how people physically engage with AI. Industry analysts believe the move could upend long-standing assumptions about hardware design.&nbsp;The first devices from the OpenAI-io collaboration are expected to debut in 2026. Until then, the companies will continue operating out of their respective offices in San Francisco, including io’s Jackson Square studio.&nbsp;As the industry looks beyond smartphones, the partnership between Altman and Ive could usher in a new chapter for consumer technology. “We’re just getting started,” said Altman. “It’s a crazy, ambitious thing to make—and it’ll be worth the wait.”

As part of the deal, OpenAI will absorb io’s 55-person team of engineers, scientists, and manufacturing experts. Ive himself will not become an OpenAI employee but will assume “deep design and creative responsibilities” across both OpenAI and io. 

In a move that signals a shift in the tech industry’s race to redefine hardware for the artificial intelligence (AI) age, OpenAI has acquired the design-focused hardware startup io, co-founded by former Apple designer Sir Jony Ive, in a deal valued at nearly $6.5 billion. The all-equity acquisition is OpenAI’s largest deal to date and marks the company’s formal entry into consumer hardware, as it seeks to build the next generation of devices purpose-built for an AI-native future. The acquisition, announced on May 22, follows nearly two years of quiet collaboration between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Ive, whose design work at Apple shaped the modern consumer technology landscape through products like the iPhone, iPod, and MacBook. Their shared ambition to reimagine how humans interact with computers has culminated in the creation of io, a startup that aimed to build a “family of products for the AGI (artificial general intelligence) era”—referencing AGI, a theoretical form of AI with human-level capabilities. As part of the deal, OpenAI will absorb io’s 55-person team of engineers, scientists, and manufacturing experts. Ive himself will not become an OpenAI employee but will assume “deep design and creative responsibilities” across both OpenAI and io via his design firm, LoveFrom, which will remain independent. LoveFrom will now become a long-term creative partner for OpenAI, overseeing the design direction of its hardware, apps, and future versions of ChatGPT. Reimagining human-computer interaction “This is an extraordinary moment,” Ive and Altman wrote in a joint statement. “Computers are now seeing, thinking, and understanding. Yet our experience with them remains shaped by traditional products and interfaces. We are on the brink of a new generation of technology.” While exact details about the upcoming hardware remain limited, both Ive and Altman emphasised that the devices under development are intended to break free from the screen-based computing paradigm. Early concepts reportedly include wearable devices like AI-powered glasses or headphones with contextual awareness. Altman said the project aims to “completely reimagine what it means to use a computer,” adding that the leap in AI capabilities now demands new form factors. “AI is such a big leap forward in terms of what people can do that it needs a new kind of computing experience to get the maximum potential out of it,” he stated. The move marks a return to consumer technology for Ive, who left Apple in 2019 after nearly three decades, during which he designed many of the company’s most iconic products in collaboration with Steve Jobs. He later founded LoveFrom, which has worked with Ferrari, Airbnb, and Moncler, and in 2023 launched io, formed under the LoveFrom umbrella, with fellow Apple alumni Scott Cannon, Evans Hankey, and Tang Tan. “I have a growing sense that everything I’ve learned over the last 30 years has led me to this place and to this moment,” Ive said. “It’s a relationship and a way of working together that I think is going to yield products and products and products.” The OpenAI deal also reunites Ive with Hankey, Apple’s former VP of industrial design, and Tan, who led iPhone and Apple Watch hardware engineering until 2024. Both will join OpenAI as part of the io integration. Implications for the tech industry OpenAI’s bold foray into hardware comes at a time when traditional tech giants like Apple, Meta, and Google are all vying to define the next era of AI-infused devices. Apple, once a leader in consumer hardware innovation, has faced criticism for its slower pace in AI integration. By bringing Ive onboard, OpenAI not only gains a world-class design team but also signals its intent to go beyond software and reshape how people physically engage with AI. Industry analysts believe the move could upend long-standing assumptions about hardware design. The first devices from the OpenAI-io collaboration are expected to debut in 2026. Until then, the companies will continue operating out of their respective offices in San Francisco, including io’s Jackson Square studio. As the industry looks beyond smartphones, the partnership between Altman and Ive could usher in a new chapter for consumer technology. “We’re just getting started,” said Altman. “It’s a crazy, ambitious thing to make—and it’ll be worth the wait.”

As part of the deal, OpenAI will absorb io’s 55-person team of engineers, scientists, and manufacturing experts. Ive himself will not become an OpenAI employee but will assume “deep design and creative responsibilities” across both OpenAI and io.&nbsp;

OpenAI acquires Jony Ive’s startup for $6.5 billion to build AI hardware

The scenic region of Kashmir, once bustling with travellers exploring alpine meadows, houseboats, and snow-capped peaks, now lies silent. Following the 22 April attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 people, fear spread rapidly through the valley.&nbsp;&nbsp;Tens of thousands of tourists rushed to leave, triggering a wave of cancellations and paralysing the region’s fragile tourism economy.&nbsp;Hotels, guesthouses, and Srinagar’s famous houseboats are now deserted. May and June which is traditionally peak months are seeing virtually no new bookings. Yaseen Tuman, a sixth-generation houseboat operator in Srinagar, told Associated Press the current situation is dire. “There is a haunting silence now. This isn’t just a seasonal slump — it’s a crisis,” he said. “If all goes well, we might start seeing tourists again in six months. Until then, it’s survival mode.”<h2>Tourism as Kashmir’s fragile backbone</h2>Tourism accounts for nearly seven per cent of Jammu and Kashmir’s economy, according to the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, J&amp;K Government. In 2024, the region had seen a promising start, with over three million tourists visiting — a steady increase from 2.71 million in 2023. That influx spurred economic activity, encouraging thousands of locals to invest in family-run hotels, transport services, restaurants, and handicraft businesses.&nbsp;But the optimism was short-lived. “Sheer devastation,” said Sheikh Bashir Ahmed, Vice President of the Kashmir Hotel and Restaurant Association, speaking to Associated Press. “We had 12,000 hotel rooms booked till June, all have been cancelled. Tens of thousands of people in the hospitality sector are now jobless.” The disruption goes far beyond hotels. Handicraft sellers in Srinagar’s bustling bazaars say footfall has plummeted. On Dal Lake, once filled with tourists in brightly painted shikaras, boatmen now spend their days anchored and idle. “There used to be long queues for boat rides,” said Fayaz Ahmed, a boatman. “Now there’s nothing but silence.” Taxi drivers are facing similar hardships. Mohammed Irfan, who usually ferries tourists to Gulmarg and the Mughal gardens, told Associated Press that he hasn’t had work in two weeks. “Even a half-day break was a luxury before,” he said. “Now, my vehicle hasn’t moved.” While Kashmir’s tourism sector has long been vulnerable to political and security shocks, it had shown surprising resilience in recent years, even after the revocation of Article 370 in 2019. The Modi government had cited the rising number of tourist arrivals as a key indicator of normalcy returning to the valley.&nbsp;But the latest crisis has shattered that narrative. With tensions escalating and no clear diplomatic thaw in sight, many believe the future of Kashmir’s tourism hinges on long-term geopolitical stability.&nbsp;“This will keep happening unless the core issue between India and Pakistan is resolved,” said Sheikh Bashir Ahmed. “Tourism needs peace. Without it, this cycle of revival and collapse will continue,” he told Associated Press.<h2>India’s five big strikes after Pahalgam</h2>In the aftermath of the 22 April terror attack, India swiftly responded with a combination of diplomatic, economic, and military measures aimed at isolating Pakistan and dismantling terror networks. According to the Associated Press, New Delhi first suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, a 1960 agreement that governs water sharing between the two countries. This move was symbolic and strategic — a direct message that all options were on the table.&nbsp;India then expelled Pakistani military advisers stationed at its New Delhi mission and scaled down its diplomatic staff in Islamabad. In a significant escalation, India revoked all visas issued to Pakistani nationals and suspended the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme, effectively closing its borders to Pakistani travellers. &nbsp;On 1 May, India shut down the Attari–Wagah border crossing, the only overland trade and travel route between the two nations. The most consequential move, however, came in the form of Operation Sindoor, a military strike executed between 6 and 7 May, in which India targeted nine terror infrastructure sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, especially in Poonch, Rajouri and Akhnoor. According to Army officials quoted by the Associated Press, six of those sites were effectively neutralised.<h2>Tanks on the move, missiles in the sky</h2> The situation escalated rapidly. India moved T-72 tanks and BMP-2 armoured vehicles close to the Line of Control (LoC) in a show of force. Pakistan responded with attempted drone and missile strikes on 8, 9 and 10 May, prompting further skirmishes along the LoC. However, after backchannel talks between the two militaries on 10 May, both sides agreed to a ceasefire, putting a temporary lid on hostility. &nbsp; &nbsp;

Business & Economy: Hotels, guesthouses, and Srinagar’s famous houseboats are now deserted. May and June which is traditionally peak months are seeing virtually no new bookings.

The scenic region of Kashmir, once bustling with travellers exploring alpine meadows, houseboats, and snow-capped peaks, now lies silent. Following the 22 April attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 people, fear spread rapidly through the valley. Tens of thousands of tourists rushed to leave, triggering a wave of cancellations and paralysing the region’s fragile tourism economy. Hotels, guesthouses, and Srinagar’s famous houseboats are now deserted. May and June which is traditionally peak months are seeing virtually no new bookings. Yaseen Tuman, a sixth-generation houseboat operator in Srinagar, told Associated Press the current situation is dire. “There is a haunting silence now. This isn’t just a seasonal slump — it’s a crisis,” he said. “If all goes well, we might start seeing tourists again in six months. Until then, it’s survival mode.” Tourism as Kashmir’s fragile backbone Tourism accounts for nearly seven per cent of Jammu and Kashmir’s economy, according to the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, J&K Government. In 2024, the region had seen a promising start, with over three million tourists visiting — a steady increase from 2.71 million in 2023. That influx spurred economic activity, encouraging thousands of locals to invest in family-run hotels, transport services, restaurants, and handicraft businesses. But the optimism was short-lived. “Sheer devastation,” said Sheikh Bashir Ahmed, Vice President of the Kashmir Hotel and Restaurant Association, speaking to Associated Press. “We had 12,000 hotel rooms booked till June, all have been cancelled. Tens of thousands of people in the hospitality sector are now jobless.” The disruption goes far beyond hotels. Handicraft sellers in Srinagar’s bustling bazaars say footfall has plummeted. On Dal Lake, once filled with tourists in brightly painted shikaras, boatmen now spend their days anchored and idle. “There used to be long queues for boat rides,” said Fayaz Ahmed, a boatman. “Now there’s nothing but silence.” Taxi drivers are facing similar hardships. Mohammed Irfan, who usually ferries tourists to Gulmarg and the Mughal gardens, told Associated Press that he hasn’t had work in two weeks. “Even a half-day break was a luxury before,” he said. “Now, my vehicle hasn’t moved.” While Kashmir’s tourism sector has long been vulnerable to political and security shocks, it had shown surprising resilience in recent years, even after the revocation of Article 370 in 2019. The Modi government had cited the rising number of tourist arrivals as a key indicator of normalcy returning to the valley. But the latest crisis has shattered that narrative. With tensions escalating and no clear diplomatic thaw in sight, many believe the future of Kashmir’s tourism hinges on long-term geopolitical stability. “This will keep happening unless the core issue between India and Pakistan is resolved,” said Sheikh Bashir Ahmed. “Tourism needs peace. Without it, this cycle of revival and collapse will continue,” he told Associated Press. India’s five big strikes after Pahalgam In the aftermath of the 22 April terror attack, India swiftly responded with a combination of diplomatic, economic, and military measures aimed at isolating Pakistan and dismantling terror networks. According to the Associated Press, New Delhi first suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, a 1960 agreement that governs water sharing between the two countries. This move was symbolic and strategic — a direct message that all options were on the table. India then expelled Pakistani military advisers stationed at its New Delhi mission and scaled down its diplomatic staff in Islamabad. In a significant escalation, India revoked all visas issued to Pakistani nationals and suspended the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme, effectively closing its borders to Pakistani travellers. On 1 May, India shut down the Attari–Wagah border crossing, the only overland trade and travel route between the two nations. The most consequential move, however, came in the form of Operation Sindoor, a military strike executed between 6 and 7 May, in which India targeted nine terror infrastructure sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, especially in Poonch, Rajouri and Akhnoor. According to Army officials quoted by the Associated Press, six of those sites were effectively neutralised. Tanks on the move, missiles in the sky The situation escalated rapidly. India moved T-72 tanks and BMP-2 armoured vehicles close to the Line of Control (LoC) in a show of force. Pakistan responded with attempted drone and missile strikes on 8, 9 and 10 May, prompting further skirmishes along the LoC. However, after backchannel talks between the two militaries on 10 May, both sides agreed to a ceasefire, putting a temporary lid on hostility.

Following the 22 April attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 people, fear spread rapidly through the Kashmir valley. Tens of thousands of tourists rushed to leave, triggering a wave of cancellations and paralysing the region’s fragile tourism economy.

Kashmir left high and dry as tourism collapses amid India-Pakistan tensions

Bitcoin surged to a new all-time high on May 22, climbing above $111,000 for the first time, as bullish momentum built on the back of institutional investment, favourable macroeconomic trends, and progress on US crypto regulation.&nbsp;The cryptocurrency claimed an intra-day high of $111,746 at 0400 GMT according to CoinMarketCap, surpassing its previous high from January. It has gained more than 18 per cent in May alone, reflecting growing demand from institutional investors and renewed optimism in the broader market.&nbsp;What is boosting Bitcoin?&nbsp;Driving the rally is a wave of fresh capital flowing into US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). eToro Australia analyst Reece Hobson told Decrypt that the net inflows into these ETFs have topped $2.8 billion this month, lifting total ETF holdings to more than $122 billion. Hobson noted that this demand, along with tighter supply following April’s Bitcoin halving event, has been a powerful catalyst.&nbsp;Meanwhile, traditional financial giants are increasingly warming up to crypto. J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, a long-time Bitcoin sceptic, acknowledged this week that the bank is now allowing clients to invest in the digital asset. Separately, Coinbase’s upcoming inclusion in the S&amp;P 500 index is being seen as a landmark moment for the sector, even as the exchange faces a Department of Justice probe related to a recent data breach.&nbsp;In addition to institutional flows, broader macroeconomic factors have supported Bitcoin’s rise. The weakening US dollar has bolstered the cryptocurrency’s appeal as a store of value, while a broader rally in tech stocks—the Nasdaq is up 30 per cent since April—has encouraged risk-on sentiment among investors.&nbsp;Progress on the regulatory front has also been a key driver. A bipartisan push in the US Senate to pass legislation on stablecoins has boosted confidence among investors looking for greater clarity and legitimacy in the crypto space.&nbsp;Although Bitcoin continues to lead the crypto rally, attention is gradually turning to altcoins like Ethereum and Solana, which have yet to catch up. Analysts suggest a broader rally could emerge if Bitcoin’s dominance rises further and liquidity conditions improve.&nbsp;For now, Bitcoin’s upward march reflects not just investor enthusiasm but also growing signs of institutional integration and regulatory maturity in the world of digital assets.

Bitcoin claimed an intra-day high of $111,746 at 0400 GMT according to CoinMarketCap. It has gained more than 18 per cent in May alone, reflecting growing demand from institutional investors and renewed optimism in the broader market.

Bitcoin surged to a new all-time high on May 22, climbing above $111,000 for the first time, as bullish momentum built on the back of institutional investment, favourable macroeconomic trends, and progress on US crypto regulation. The cryptocurrency claimed an intra-day high of $111,746 at 0400 GMT according to CoinMarketCap, surpassing its previous high from January. It has gained more than 18 per cent in May alone, reflecting growing demand from institutional investors and renewed optimism in the broader market. What is boosting Bitcoin? Driving the rally is a wave of fresh capital flowing into US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). eToro Australia analyst Reece Hobson told Decrypt that the net inflows into these ETFs have topped $2.8 billion this month, lifting total ETF holdings to more than $122 billion. Hobson noted that this demand, along with tighter supply following April’s Bitcoin halving event, has been a powerful catalyst. Meanwhile, traditional financial giants are increasingly warming up to crypto. J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, a long-time Bitcoin sceptic, acknowledged this week that the bank is now allowing clients to invest in the digital asset. Separately, Coinbase’s upcoming inclusion in the S&P 500 index is being seen as a landmark moment for the sector, even as the exchange faces a Department of Justice probe related to a recent data breach. In addition to institutional flows, broader macroeconomic factors have supported Bitcoin’s rise. The weakening US dollar has bolstered the cryptocurrency’s appeal as a store of value, while a broader rally in tech stocks—the Nasdaq is up 30 per cent since April—has encouraged risk-on sentiment among investors. Progress on the regulatory front has also been a key driver. A bipartisan push in the US Senate to pass legislation on stablecoins has boosted confidence among investors looking for greater clarity and legitimacy in the crypto space. Although Bitcoin continues to lead the crypto rally, attention is gradually turning to altcoins like Ethereum and Solana, which have yet to catch up. Analysts suggest a broader rally could emerge if Bitcoin’s dominance rises further and liquidity conditions improve. For now, Bitcoin’s upward march reflects not just investor enthusiasm but also growing signs of institutional integration and regulatory maturity in the world of digital assets.

Bitcoin claimed an intra-day high of $111,746 at 0400 GMT according to CoinMarketCap. It has gained more than 18 per cent in May alone, reflecting growing demand from institutional investors and renewed optimism in the broader market.

Bitcoin hits record high amid institutional buying and regulatory optimism

India is poised to weather ongoing global economic turbulence, according to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) latest bulletin, which highlights strong macro fundamentals, easing inflation, and strategic foreign exchange management.&nbsp;&nbsp;At the same time, New Delhi is navigating shifting global trade currents — from a critical tariff truce with the US to the successful conclusion of a landmark free trade agreement with the United Kingdom.&nbsp;“The global economic outlook remains clouded amidst shifting policy landscapes and lingering vulnerabilities,” the RBI said in its May bulletin. “India stands well-positioned to navigate the ongoing global headwinds with confidence, ready to harness emerging opportunities and consolidate its role as a key driver of global growth.”<h2>RBI eases rates, inflation cools</h2>Retail inflation dropped to 3.16 per cent in April, marking the third consecutive month below the RBI’s 4 per cent target and the lowest level since July 2019. With inflationary pressures easing, the central bank adopted an ‘accommodative’ monetary policy stance, cutting rates for the second time in April and signalling further support to spur growth.&nbsp;The bulletin also warned of increasing temperature anomalies affecting vegetable prices, calling for quicker adoption of climate-resilient crops to support long-term price stability.<h2>Forex reserves surge amid rupee rally</h2>In a sign of active intervention, the RBI reported a net purchase of $14.36 billion in the spot foreign exchange market in March, reversing a $1.6 billion net sale in February. This move came as the Indian rupee appreciated over 2 per cent during the month, buoyed by a weaker US dollar and strong foreign inflows.&nbsp;The rupee traded between 85.39 and 87.44 per US dollar in March and stood at 85.6375 on 22 May. Meanwhile, the RBI’s net forward sale contracts stood at $84.35 billion by end-March, indicating continued efforts to manage currency volatility.<h2>IMF outlook: India to remain fastest-growing major economy</h2>The International Monetary Fund (IMF) echoed a similarly positive tone. In its latest World Economic Outlook, the IMF projected India’s economy to grow by 6.8 per cent in 2025, making it the fastest-growing major economy in the world.&nbsp; The Fund credited robust domestic demand, public infrastructure spending, and resilient services exports for India’s growth momentum, even as global growth remains subdued.&nbsp;The IMF also praised India’s efforts in maintaining macroeconomic stability, especially amid tight global financial conditions and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty.<h2>Navigating to global trade tension&nbsp;</h2> The RBI’s optimism comes as India recalibrates its global trade strategy. Following President Donald Trump’s 9 April announcement of a 90-day tariff pause, India is racing to clinch a trade deal with the US to prevent a punitive 26 per cent tariff on Indian exports.&nbsp; The pause provides a narrow window for negotiation, with New Delhi eyeing quicker access for key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, textiles, and IT services. In contrast, India has scored a major breakthrough on the western front. Earlier this month, India and the UK concluded negotiations for a long-awaited free trade agreement (FTA) — a deal in the works since January 2022. The India-UK trade pact aims to double bilateral trade from $60 billion to $120 billion by 2030. It eliminates import duties on 99 per cent of Indian goods entering the UK, granting enhanced access for sectors such as textiles, gems and jewellery, auto parts, and agriculture. In return, British firms will gain broader access to India’s fast-growing market, including in areas like legal services, education, and renewable energy.&nbsp; India has also ensured protection for sensitive sectors, maintaining a balance between liberalisation and domestic interests.&nbsp;

Business & Economy: RBI's bulletin comes at a time when New Delhi is navigating shifting global trade currents — from a critical tariff truce with the US to the successful conclusion of a landmark free trade agreement with the United Kingdom.

India is poised to weather ongoing global economic turbulence, according to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) latest bulletin, which highlights strong macro fundamentals, easing inflation, and strategic foreign exchange management. At the same time, New Delhi is navigating shifting global trade currents — from a critical tariff truce with the US to the successful conclusion of a landmark free trade agreement with the United Kingdom. “The global economic outlook remains clouded amidst shifting policy landscapes and lingering vulnerabilities,” the RBI said in its May bulletin. “India stands well-positioned to navigate the ongoing global headwinds with confidence, ready to harness emerging opportunities and consolidate its role as a key driver of global growth.” RBI eases rates, inflation cools Retail inflation dropped to 3.16 per cent in April, marking the third consecutive month below the RBI’s 4 per cent target and the lowest level since July 2019. With inflationary pressures easing, the central bank adopted an ‘accommodative’ monetary policy stance, cutting rates for the second time in April and signalling further support to spur growth. The bulletin also warned of increasing temperature anomalies affecting vegetable prices, calling for quicker adoption of climate-resilient crops to support long-term price stability. Forex reserves surge amid rupee rally In a sign of active intervention, the RBI reported a net purchase of $14.36 billion in the spot foreign exchange market in March, reversing a $1.6 billion net sale in February. This move came as the Indian rupee appreciated over 2 per cent during the month, buoyed by a weaker US dollar and strong foreign inflows. The rupee traded between 85.39 and 87.44 per US dollar in March and stood at 85.6375 on 22 May. Meanwhile, the RBI’s net forward sale contracts stood at $84.35 billion by end-March, indicating continued efforts to manage currency volatility. IMF outlook: India to remain fastest-growing major economy The International Monetary Fund (IMF) echoed a similarly positive tone. In its latest World Economic Outlook, the IMF projected India’s economy to grow by 6.8 per cent in 2025, making it the fastest-growing major economy in the world. The Fund credited robust domestic demand, public infrastructure spending, and resilient services exports for India’s growth momentum, even as global growth remains subdued. The IMF also praised India’s efforts in maintaining macroeconomic stability, especially amid tight global financial conditions and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty. Navigating to global trade tension The RBI’s optimism comes as India recalibrates its global trade strategy. Following President Donald Trump’s 9 April announcement of a 90-day tariff pause, India is racing to clinch a trade deal with the US to prevent a punitive 26 per cent tariff on Indian exports. The pause provides a narrow window for negotiation, with New Delhi eyeing quicker access for key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, textiles, and IT services. In contrast, India has scored a major breakthrough on the western front. Earlier this month, India and the UK concluded negotiations for a long-awaited free trade agreement (FTA) — a deal in the works since January 2022. The India-UK trade pact aims to double bilateral trade from $60 billion to $120 billion by 2030. It eliminates import duties on 99 per cent of Indian goods entering the UK, granting enhanced access for sectors such as textiles, gems and jewellery, auto parts, and agriculture. In return, British firms will gain broader access to India’s fast-growing market, including in areas like legal services, education, and renewable energy. India has also ensured protection for sensitive sectors, maintaining a balance between liberalisation and domestic interests.

&nbsp;According to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) latest bulletin, India is poised to weather ongoing global economic turbulence, highlighting strong macro fundamentals, easing inflation, and strategic foreign exchange management.&nbsp;

RBI says India remains resilient as global trade landscape shifts

In an interview with The Indian Express, recently appointed Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey addressed the challenges that arose under the previous leadership, particularly with respect to the handling of conflicts of interest.Pandey’s comments come just a few months after the controversial three-year tenure of his predecessor, Madhabi Puri Buch, whose term ended in February.Pandey, who took charge amid lingering questions surrounding Buch’s leadership, acknowledged that the SEBI leadership under Buch had failed to meet even “minimal expectations” in terms of transparency and disclosure.He further pointed to the lack of public disclosures regarding potential conflicts of interest and stressed the need for a systematic approach to address such issues.&nbsp;Call for disclosure framework&nbsp;One of the most significant concerns raised by Pandey was the absence of a robust disclosure framework under the previous SEBI leadership. He noted that when reviewing SEBI’s policies on conflict of interest, particularly those outlined in the 2008 document governing the chairman and the board and the employee regulations, he found “virtually no public disclosures”.“The conflict of interest in SEBI’s case is much wider. It’s a very difficult concept also. Like, how are you? Where is your thing? What is family? Where does it extend? Because virtually the listed companies are everywhere,” Pandey told The Indian Express.&nbsp;He emphasised that conflict of interest is a complex issue at SEBI, as officers may have overlapping relationships with companies that are listed in India and abroad.Pandey’s remarks come in the wake of the controversy surrounding Buch and her husband, Dhaval Buch, who were alleged to have held investments in offshore funds associated with Vinod Adani, the brother of Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani.Although both of them denied the allegations, the issue cast a shadow over SEBI’s credibility, particularly when Hindenburg Research made claims that SEBI had failed to take appropriate action due to potential conflicts of interest involving its chairperson.&nbsp;Pandey vows to tackle the ‘narrative’&nbsp;Pandey acknowledged the “narrative” that had developed around the conflict of interest issue during Buch’s tenure and stressed the need for SEBI to address it directly. He said, “If you have a problem and there are questions, you need to answer in a systematic way.”Pandey also mentioned that SEBI had set up an independent high-level committee to review the conflicts of interest of its board members, including the chairman. The committee, which includes experts from various sectors, is already at work and expected to submit a report within the next three months.Pandey hopes that the committee's findings will provide clarity and help resolve the ongoing concerns about SEBI’s internal processes.“When the framework gets ready, it will really put to rest this narrative that—we have to hide,” Pandey said. The committee’s mandate is to create a clear, transparent framework for handling conflicts of interest and recusal processes within SEBI.The new SEBI chief also stressed the importance of defining recusal procedures more clearly. He questioned whether SEBI officers should recuse themselves from making decisions if they have familial ties to individuals or companies involved in certain cases.“If SEBI officers are working, then where should they recuse, and where should they not recuse?” Pandey asked, emphasising that these processes must be well-defined, documented, and followed strictly.&nbsp;Transparency and accountability&nbsp;Pandey’s commitment to enhancing SEBI’s transparency is evident in his approach to conflict of interest policies. He explained that the committee would not only suggest guidelines for the board but also seek public input and draw on best practices from around the world.“We have suggested that an independent committee, which has got eminent people from different sides, assess and suggest a framework,” Pandey said. “This framework then comes to the board, and our board takes a view, and we will implement that framework.”The SEBI chief also made it clear that the regulator’s internal processes for handling investigations must be conducted transparently and in accordance with the law. “What we have to hide, we should hide in a manner which is actually sort of mandated. It means while you are investigating, you have to be hiding, and you have to reveal only when your investigation is complete,” he said.Pandey stressed that the framework would provide much-needed clarity, not only within SEBI but also for the broader financial markets. By addressing the conflicts of interest and ensuring rigorous disclosure practices, SEBI aims to restore public trust in its ability to effectively regulate India’s stock markets.The committee’s report is expected to address key areas of concern and outline steps for SEBI to implement a more transparent, accountable, and conflict-free framework going forward.

Pandey, who took charge amid lingering questions surrounding Buch’s leadership, acknowledged that the SEBI leadership under Buch had failed to meet even “minimal expectations” in terms of transparency and disclosure.

In an interview with The Indian Express, recently appointed Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey addressed the challenges that arose under the previous leadership, particularly with respect to the handling of conflicts of interest. Pandey’s comments come just a few months after the controversial three-year tenure of his predecessor, Madhabi Puri Buch, whose term ended in February. Pandey, who took charge amid lingering questions surrounding Buch’s leadership, acknowledged that the SEBI leadership under Buch had failed to meet even “minimal expectations” in terms of transparency and disclosure. He further pointed to the lack of public disclosures regarding potential conflicts of interest and stressed the need for a systematic approach to address such issues. Call for disclosure framework One of the most significant concerns raised by Pandey was the absence of a robust disclosure framework under the previous SEBI leadership. He noted that when reviewing SEBI’s policies on conflict of interest, particularly those outlined in the 2008 document governing the chairman and the board and the employee regulations, he found “virtually no public disclosures”. “The conflict of interest in SEBI’s case is much wider. It’s a very difficult concept also. Like, how are you? Where is your thing? What is family? Where does it extend? Because virtually the listed companies are everywhere,” Pandey told The Indian Express. He emphasised that conflict of interest is a complex issue at SEBI, as officers may have overlapping relationships with companies that are listed in India and abroad. Pandey’s remarks come in the wake of the controversy surrounding Buch and her husband, Dhaval Buch, who were alleged to have held investments in offshore funds associated with Vinod Adani, the brother of Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani. Although both of them denied the allegations, the issue cast a shadow over SEBI’s credibility, particularly when Hindenburg Research made claims that SEBI had failed to take appropriate action due to potential conflicts of interest involving its chairperson. Pandey vows to tackle the ‘narrative’ Pandey acknowledged the “narrative” that had developed around the conflict of interest issue during Buch’s tenure and stressed the need for SEBI to address it directly. He said, “If you have a problem and there are questions, you need to answer in a systematic way.” Pandey also mentioned that SEBI had set up an independent high-level committee to review the conflicts of interest of its board members, including the chairman. The committee, which includes experts from various sectors, is already at work and expected to submit a report within the next three months. Pandey hopes that the committee's findings will provide clarity and help resolve the ongoing concerns about SEBI’s internal processes. “When the framework gets ready, it will really put to rest this narrative that—we have to hide,” Pandey said. The committee’s mandate is to create a clear, transparent framework for handling conflicts of interest and recusal processes within SEBI. The new SEBI chief also stressed the importance of defining recusal procedures more clearly. He questioned whether SEBI officers should recuse themselves from making decisions if they have familial ties to individuals or companies involved in certain cases. “If SEBI officers are working, then where should they recuse, and where should they not recuse?” Pandey asked, emphasising that these processes must be well-defined, documented, and followed strictly. Transparency and accountability Pandey’s commitment to enhancing SEBI’s transparency is evident in his approach to conflict of interest policies. He explained that the committee would not only suggest guidelines for the board but also seek public input and draw on best practices from around the world. “We have suggested that an independent committee, which has got eminent people from different sides, assess and suggest a framework,” Pandey said. “This framework then comes to the board, and our board takes a view, and we will implement that framework.” The SEBI chief also made it clear that the regulator’s internal processes for handling investigations must be conducted transparently and in accordance with the law. “What we have to hide, we should hide in a manner which is actually sort of mandated. It means while you are investigating, you have to be hiding, and you have to reveal only when your investigation is complete,” he said. Pandey stressed that the framework would provide much-needed clarity, not only within SEBI but also for the broader financial markets. By addressing the conflicts of interest and ensuring rigorous disclosure practices, SEBI aims to restore public trust in its ability to effectively regulate India’s stock markets. The committee’s report is expected to address key areas of concern and outline steps for SEBI to implement a more transparent, accountable, and conflict-free framework going forward.

Pandey, who took charge amid lingering questions surrounding Buch’s leadership, acknowledged that the SEBI leadership under Buch had failed to meet even “minimal expectations” in terms of transparency and disclosure.

SEBI chief calls for transparent disclosure framework to address conflict of interest

The Supreme Court of India on May 19 strongly criticised the central government for its prolonged failure to bring a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, stating that the absence of such a framework has created a breeding ground for “misuse”.The apex court reiterated its earlier observation that unregulated Bitcoin trading is “nothing but a more polished form of Hawala”, an illegal informal money transfer system.A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh made these remarks while hearing a bail petition filed by Shailesh Babulal Bhatt, a Gujarat resident accused of multi-state cryptocurrency-related fraud.While the bail plea itself was not directly related to broader policy, the bench expressed grave concerns about the lack of regulation in the crypto sector. They questioned why the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the prosecuting agency, chose to arrest Bhatt after completing its probe when he was not arrested during the ongoing investigation.&nbsp;Call for regulation, not ban&nbsp;The Supreme Court reminded the government that nearly two years ago, it had sought clarity on India’s policy regarding virtual currencies. The bench emphasised that outright banning cryptocurrencies would be unwise, especially as new financial mechanisms are evolving in global trade, but stressed that some form of regulation is absolutely essential. The top court asserted that the government’s failure to regulate this space amounted to turning a “blind eye” to a pressing issue.“Nobody is saying to stop it since you have said earlier that cryptocurrency is not illegal and banning it will not be wise for the economy. Banning may be shutting your eyes to the ground reality. But what about regulating it?” Justice Kant remarked.Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Union, sought time to obtain instructions on the matter. The Court also highlighted the practical and evidentiary challenges law enforcement faces in the absence of a legal definition or framework for crypto assets. “If tomorrow somebody asks, ‘Prove what is this asset, how are we going to prove it?’ We are not experts. Experts will have to examine it, but some steps to regulate it are necessary. We are told crypto trading is very volatile... today a Bitcoin might be worth lakhs, and tomorrow it can mean nothing,” the bench observed.Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Bhatt, argued that Bitcoin trading is not illegal in India, citing the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision that struck down a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular barring banks from facilitating crypto-related transactions. He contended that Bhatt's arrest was unjustified given the absence of a law explicitly banning such activity.ASG Bhati informed the Court that an updated report on the investigation progress and the Centre’s position on cryptocurrency would be submitted by July.Currently, India imposes a flat 30 per cent tax on profits from cryptocurrency transactions and a 1 per cent tax deducted at source on every trade. However, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are neither recognised as legal tender nor banned outright.Manvinder Singh, Partner, JSA Advocates &amp; Solicitors believes that “The Supreme Court’s remark reinforces the importance of striking a balance between innovation and regulatory oversight. It reflects a broader understanding that as the crypto market continues to mature, it’s important for the legal and regulatory system to keep pace and provide a robust, future-ready framework that ensures investor protection, market integrity, and innovation.”The RBI has repeatedly warned of the risks associated with crypto investments, even as it promotes the Digital Rupee, a central bank digital currency. A draft bill to regulate cryptocurrencies was prepared in 2021 but is yet to be tabled in Parliament.This is not the first time the Supreme Court has flagged the issue. In July 2023, another bench had directed the union government to clarify whether it intended to “set up a federal agency to investigate criminal cases involving cryptocurrencies,” lamenting the lack of both a regulatory law and an expert agency to probe such matters.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

SC said Center's prolonged failure to bring a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies has created a breeding ground for misuse

The Supreme Court of India on May 19 strongly criticised the central government for its prolonged failure to bring a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, stating that the absence of such a framework has created a breeding ground for “misuse”. The apex court reiterated its earlier observation that unregulated Bitcoin trading is “nothing but a more polished form of Hawala”, an illegal informal money transfer system. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh made these remarks while hearing a bail petition filed by Shailesh Babulal Bhatt, a Gujarat resident accused of multi-state cryptocurrency-related fraud. While the bail plea itself was not directly related to broader policy, the bench expressed grave concerns about the lack of regulation in the crypto sector. They questioned why the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the prosecuting agency, chose to arrest Bhatt after completing its probe when he was not arrested during the ongoing investigation. Call for regulation, not ban The Supreme Court reminded the government that nearly two years ago, it had sought clarity on India’s policy regarding virtual currencies. The bench emphasised that outright banning cryptocurrencies would be unwise, especially as new financial mechanisms are evolving in global trade, but stressed that some form of regulation is absolutely essential. The top court asserted that the government’s failure to regulate this space amounted to turning a “blind eye” to a pressing issue. “Nobody is saying to stop it since you have said earlier that cryptocurrency is not illegal and banning it will not be wise for the economy. Banning may be shutting your eyes to the ground reality. But what about regulating it?” Justice Kant remarked. Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Union, sought time to obtain instructions on the matter. The Court also highlighted the practical and evidentiary challenges law enforcement faces in the absence of a legal definition or framework for crypto assets. “If tomorrow somebody asks, ‘Prove what is this asset, how are we going to prove it?’ We are not experts. Experts will have to examine it, but some steps to regulate it are necessary. We are told crypto trading is very volatile... today a Bitcoin might be worth lakhs, and tomorrow it can mean nothing,” the bench observed. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Bhatt, argued that Bitcoin trading is not illegal in India, citing the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision that struck down a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular barring banks from facilitating crypto-related transactions. He contended that Bhatt's arrest was unjustified given the absence of a law explicitly banning such activity. ASG Bhati informed the Court that an updated report on the investigation progress and the Centre’s position on cryptocurrency would be submitted by July. Currently, India imposes a flat 30 per cent tax on profits from cryptocurrency transactions and a 1 per cent tax deducted at source on every trade. However, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are neither recognised as legal tender nor banned outright. Manvinder Singh, Partner, JSA Advocates & Solicitors believes that “The Supreme Court’s remark reinforces the importance of striking a balance between innovation and regulatory oversight. It reflects a broader understanding that as the crypto market continues to mature, it’s important for the legal and regulatory system to keep pace and provide a robust, future-ready framework that ensures investor protection, market integrity, and innovation.” The RBI has repeatedly warned of the risks associated with crypto investments, even as it promotes the Digital Rupee, a central bank digital currency. A draft bill to regulate cryptocurrencies was prepared in 2021 but is yet to be tabled in Parliament. This is not the first time the Supreme Court has flagged the issue. In July 2023, another bench had directed the union government to clarify whether it intended to “set up a federal agency to investigate criminal cases involving cryptocurrencies,” lamenting the lack of both a regulatory law and an expert agency to probe such matters. (With inputs from agencies)

SC said Center's prolonged failure to bring a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies has created a breeding ground for “misuse”

Supreme Court slams central government for crypto inaction

Japan's export growth continued to decelerate in April, as the ongoing US tariff measures weighed heavily on its shipments, particularly to the US, its largest trading partner.According to official data released by the Ministry of Finance, Japan's total exports grew by just 2 per cent year-on-year, matching analysts' estimates but marking a significant slowdown from March's 4 per cent increase. The slowdown highlights the growing impact of trade tensions between Japan and the US, as well as a fragile global economy.Exports to the US fell 1.8 per cent in April, marking the first drop since December 2024. The decrease was primarily driven by lower demand for key exports like automobiles, steel, and ships. Exports of motor vehicles to the US saw a sharp 4.8 per cent decline, reflecting the combined effect of a stronger yen and the US tariffs on Japanese cars.These tariffs, which were introduced in early 2025, include a 25 per cent levy on cars and a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most Japanese goods. The automotive sector, which accounts for a significant portion of Japan's exports to the US, has been particularly hard-hit by these measures.&nbsp;Rising tariffs cloud economic outlook&nbsp;Despite some growth in exports to Asia, which rose 6 per cent in April, Japan's overall trade balance swung into a deficit of ¥115.8 billion ($797 million) after recording two consecutive months of surpluses.The export slowdown comes at a precarious moment for Japan, as the country's economy had already contracted in the first quarter of 2025. The 0.7 per cent annualised contraction in GDP was largely driven by weak private consumption and a slowdown in exports.The US tariffs are expected to further strain Japan's economic prospects. While Japan has been in negotiations with the US to ease the tariffs, the chances of a significant breakthrough remain slim.Japan's chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, is set to travel to Washington for a third round of talks, but analysts suggest that resolving the tariff dispute will be difficult without substantial concessions from both sides.Automobile exports, which account for around 28 per cent of Japan's total shipments to the United States, have been particularly vulnerable to tariff hikes. Japan exports about 1.5 million vehicles to the US annually, and the escalating duties have raised concerns among Japanese automakers about the long-term viability of their US market strategy. This uncertainty could also discourage manufacturers from making significant investments, further dampening Japan's economic recovery.&nbsp;Uncertainties lie ahead&nbsp;The broader economic implications of these trade challenges are likely to extend beyond exports. Japanese manufacturers, which are deeply integrated into global supply chains, face heightened risks from fluctuating trade policies and tariff uncertainties.With Japan already grappling with a stagnating domestic economy, any further disruptions to global trade could push the country into a technical recession. The weak export performance has also placed pressure on the Bank of Japan (BOJ), which had hoped to resume its tightening cycle in response to rising inflation and wages. However, the uncertainty surrounding tariffs and their impact on Japan's economy is expected to delay any interest rate hikes.As Japan faces an uncertain economic future, both domestic policymakers and businesses will need to adapt to the shifting global trade landscape. The resolution of tariff disputes with the US will be crucial, but the broader economic environment will continue to play a significant role in shaping Japan's recovery path.(With inputs from agencies)

Japan's total exports grew by just 2 per cent year-on-year. The slowdown highlights the growing impact of trade tensions between Japan and the US, as well as a fragile global economy.

Japan's export growth continued to decelerate in April, as the ongoing US tariff measures weighed heavily on its shipments, particularly to the US, its largest trading partner. According to official data released by the Ministry of Finance, Japan's total exports grew by just 2 per cent year-on-year, matching analysts' estimates but marking a significant slowdown from March's 4 per cent increase. The slowdown highlights the growing impact of trade tensions between Japan and the US, as well as a fragile global economy. Exports to the US fell 1.8 per cent in April, marking the first drop since December 2024. The decrease was primarily driven by lower demand for key exports like automobiles, steel, and ships. Exports of motor vehicles to the US saw a sharp 4.8 per cent decline, reflecting the combined effect of a stronger yen and the US tariffs on Japanese cars. These tariffs, which were introduced in early 2025, include a 25 per cent levy on cars and a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most Japanese goods. The automotive sector, which accounts for a significant portion of Japan's exports to the US, has been particularly hard-hit by these measures. Rising tariffs cloud economic outlook Despite some growth in exports to Asia, which rose 6 per cent in April, Japan's overall trade balance swung into a deficit of ¥115.8 billion ($797 million) after recording two consecutive months of surpluses. The export slowdown comes at a precarious moment for Japan, as the country's economy had already contracted in the first quarter of 2025. The 0.7 per cent annualised contraction in GDP was largely driven by weak private consumption and a slowdown in exports. The US tariffs are expected to further strain Japan's economic prospects. While Japan has been in negotiations with the US to ease the tariffs, the chances of a significant breakthrough remain slim. Japan's chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, is set to travel to Washington for a third round of talks, but analysts suggest that resolving the tariff dispute will be difficult without substantial concessions from both sides. Automobile exports, which account for around 28 per cent of Japan's total shipments to the United States, have been particularly vulnerable to tariff hikes. Japan exports about 1.5 million vehicles to the US annually, and the escalating duties have raised concerns among Japanese automakers about the long-term viability of their US market strategy. This uncertainty could also discourage manufacturers from making significant investments, further dampening Japan's economic recovery. Uncertainties lie ahead The broader economic implications of these trade challenges are likely to extend beyond exports. Japanese manufacturers, which are deeply integrated into global supply chains, face heightened risks from fluctuating trade policies and tariff uncertainties. With Japan already grappling with a stagnating domestic economy, any further disruptions to global trade could push the country into a technical recession. The weak export performance has also placed pressure on the Bank of Japan (BOJ), which had hoped to resume its tightening cycle in response to rising inflation and wages. However, the uncertainty surrounding tariffs and their impact on Japan's economy is expected to delay any interest rate hikes. As Japan faces an uncertain economic future, both domestic policymakers and businesses will need to adapt to the shifting global trade landscape. The resolution of tariff disputes with the US will be crucial, but the broader economic environment will continue to play a significant role in shaping Japan's recovery path. (With inputs from agencies)

Japan's total exports grew by just 2 per cent year-on-year. The slowdown highlights the growing impact of trade tensions between Japan and the US, as well as a fragile global economy.

Japan's export growth slows amid US tariffs and global uncertainty

Britain’s inflation rate unexpectedly surged in April, rising to 3.5 per cent from 2.6 per cent in March, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This marks the highest level since January 2024 and represents the sharpest monthly rise since 2022, when prices were spiralling above 10 per cent.&nbsp;A sharp spike in airfares during the Easter holidays was a key contributor, with ticket prices rising by 27.5 per cent from March, the second-largest monthly jump on record.&nbsp;&nbsp;The timing of Easter, which fell in April this year, intensified seasonal travel demand, amplifying the price surge.&nbsp;As per Reuters, economists had expected consumer price inflation to rise to 3.3 per cent, while the Bank of England (BoE) forecast 3.4 per cent. The stronger-than-expected figure complicates the central bank’s efforts to gradually bring inflation under control.<h2> Services inflation surges, rattling BoE</h2>More concerning for policymakers is the jump in services inflation, a key indicator of domestic price pressures.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to the ONS, services prices rose by 5.4 per cent year-on-year, outpacing both the BoE’s forecast of 5.0 per cent and the Reuters consensus of 4.8 per cent. On a monthly basis, services inflation rose 2.2 per cent, the highest single month increase in over three decades.&nbsp;&nbsp;This suggests that inflationary momentum remains embedded in the economy, especially in sectors like hospitality, transport, and insurance.&nbsp;The data comes amid warnings that persistent wage pressures and strong consumer demand could delay further interest rate cuts.<h2>Government reaction and policy outlook</h2>Finance Minister Rachel Reeves&nbsp;called the inflation figures “disappointing,” telling Reuters. “We are a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous administration, but I’m determined that we go further and faster to put more money in people’s pockets” as qoutes by Reuters.&nbsp; Following the data release, investors slashed the odds of a BoE rate cut in August to 40 per cent, down from 60 per cent. According to Reuters, only 35 basis points of cuts are now expected by the end of 2025.&nbsp;Patrick O’Donnell, Senior Investment Strategist at Omnis Investments, told Reuters, that “This data should call into question whether there is a cut… in August.”&nbsp;BoE Chief Economist Huw Pill also expressed caution and told Reuters that the pace of rate cuts may have been too quick in light of still-strong wage growth and inflationary stickiness. He voted to hold rates steady earlier this month and described the move as a “skip,” not a stop.<h2>Trade tensions escalate</h2>The inflation surge coincides with rising global trade tensions, placing the UK in a delicate position between major partners. US President Donald Trump, now in his second term, reintroduced 25 per cent tariffs on UK steel and aluminium exports in March 2025 — reversing earlier exemptions and reigniting trade war anxieties<a href="https://www.uksteel.org/">.&nbsp;</a> In response, UK-US negotiations were fast-tracked. By 8 May 2025, according to Reuters, the two sides struck a provisional deal: the US agreed to remove the 25 per cent metals tariffs in exchange for a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most UK goods.&nbsp; In return, the UK dropped its 20 per cent retaliatory tariff on US beef and introduced a quota for tariff-free beef imports.&nbsp; Though the deal eased immediate pressure, it underscored the fragility of the long-delayed UK-US free trade agreement, which has repeatedly stalled since Brexit.&nbsp; Trade analysts warn that Trump’s broader protectionist stance, targeting not just the UK, but also the EU and Asian markets and may drive up global import costs and further fuel UK inflation. Five years after the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union, both parties have signed a comprehensive agreement aimed at revitalising their relationship. This deal addresses key sectors such as trade, defence, energy, and fisheries, marking a significant step in UK-EU relations.&nbsp; The agreement comes at a time when global trade dynamics are shifting, notably with the United States imposing new tariffs under President Donald Trump’s administration&nbsp;In May 2025, the UK and EU signed supplementary protocols aimed at smoothing trade flows, reducing border delays, and clarifying rules for Northern Ireland.&nbsp;&nbsp;While not a renegotiation of the core agreement, these developments are seen as an attempt to stabilise cross-Channel commerce after five years of adjustment and uncertainty.<h2>April pain likely to linger</h2>April’s inflation surge took place during what British media had dubbed “Awful April”, a month marked by higher gas, electricity, and water bills, as well as increased employer taxes — all adding to the price burden on households and businesses.&nbsp;The BoE now expects inflation to climb to 3.7 per cent by September, raising concerns that the road to price stability may be longer and bumpier than previously anticipated, as per Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;While some employers are reportedly beginning to scale back wage increases, the data suggest the broader cost-of-living challenge is far from over.&nbsp;&nbsp;With Trump’s tariffs, volatile energy prices, and sticky services inflation all in play, the BoE faces growing pressure to tread carefully in its monetary strategy.

Business & Economy: This marks the highest level since January 2024 and represents the sharpest monthly rise since 2022, when prices were spiralling above 10 per cent.

Britain’s inflation rate unexpectedly surged in April, rising to 3.5 per cent from 2.6 per cent in March, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This marks the highest level since January 2024 and represents the sharpest monthly rise since 2022, when prices were spiralling above 10 per cent. A sharp spike in airfares during the Easter holidays was a key contributor, with ticket prices rising by 27.5 per cent from March, the second-largest monthly jump on record. The timing of Easter, which fell in April this year, intensified seasonal travel demand, amplifying the price surge. As per Reuters, economists had expected consumer price inflation to rise to 3.3 per cent, while the Bank of England (BoE) forecast 3.4 per cent. The stronger-than-expected figure complicates the central bank’s efforts to gradually bring inflation under control. Services inflation surges, rattling BoE More concerning for policymakers is the jump in services inflation, a key indicator of domestic price pressures. According to the ONS, services prices rose by 5.4 per cent year-on-year, outpacing both the BoE’s forecast of 5.0 per cent and the Reuters consensus of 4.8 per cent. On a monthly basis, services inflation rose 2.2 per cent, the highest single month increase in over three decades. This suggests that inflationary momentum remains embedded in the economy, especially in sectors like hospitality, transport, and insurance. The data comes amid warnings that persistent wage pressures and strong consumer demand could delay further interest rate cuts. Government reaction and policy outlook Finance Minister Rachel Reeves called the inflation figures “disappointing,” telling Reuters. “We are a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous administration, but I’m determined that we go further and faster to put more money in people’s pockets” as qoutes by Reuters. Following the data release, investors slashed the odds of a BoE rate cut in August to 40 per cent, down from 60 per cent. According to Reuters, only 35 basis points of cuts are now expected by the end of 2025. Patrick O’Donnell, Senior Investment Strategist at Omnis Investments, told Reuters, that “This data should call into question whether there is a cut… in August.” BoE Chief Economist Huw Pill also expressed caution and told Reuters that the pace of rate cuts may have been too quick in light of still-strong wage growth and inflationary stickiness. He voted to hold rates steady earlier this month and described the move as a “skip,” not a stop. Trade tensions escalate The inflation surge coincides with rising global trade tensions, placing the UK in a delicate position between major partners. US President Donald Trump, now in his second term, reintroduced 25 per cent tariffs on UK steel and aluminium exports in March 2025 — reversing earlier exemptions and reigniting trade war anxieties. In response, UK-US negotiations were fast-tracked. By 8 May 2025, according to Reuters, the two sides struck a provisional deal: the US agreed to remove the 25 per cent metals tariffs in exchange for a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most UK goods. In return, the UK dropped its 20 per cent retaliatory tariff on US beef and introduced a quota for tariff-free beef imports. Though the deal eased immediate pressure, it underscored the fragility of the long-delayed UK-US free trade agreement, which has repeatedly stalled since Brexit. Trade analysts warn that Trump’s broader protectionist stance, targeting not just the UK, but also the EU and Asian markets and may drive up global import costs and further fuel UK inflation. Five years after the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union, both parties have signed a comprehensive agreement aimed at revitalising their relationship. This deal addresses key sectors such as trade, defence, energy, and fisheries, marking a significant step in UK-EU relations. The agreement comes at a time when global trade dynamics are shifting, notably with the United States imposing new tariffs under President Donald Trump’s administration In May 2025, the UK and EU signed supplementary protocols aimed at smoothing trade flows, reducing border delays, and clarifying rules for Northern Ireland. While not a renegotiation of the core agreement, these developments are seen as an attempt to stabilise cross-Channel commerce after five years of adjustment and uncertainty. April pain likely to linger April’s inflation surge took place during what British media had dubbed “Awful April”, a month marked by higher gas, electricity, and water bills, as well as increased employer taxes — all adding to the price burden on households and businesses. The BoE now expects inflation to climb to 3.7 per cent by September, raising concerns that the road to price stability may be longer and bumpier than previously anticipated, as per Reuters. While some employers are reportedly beginning to scale back wage increases, the data suggest the broader cost-of-living challenge is far from over. With Trump’s tariffs, volatile energy prices, and sticky services inflation all in play, the BoE faces growing pressure to tread carefully in its monetary strategy.

Amid global trade tension, the United Kingdom's inflation rate unexpectedly surged in April, rising to 3.5 per cent from 2.6 per cent in March, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).&nbsp;

UK inflation jumps to 3.5 per cent in April; Trump tariffs and trade tensions add fuel

China’s electric vehicle (EV) industry is facing significant challenges as fierce price competition, declining profit margins, and mounting costs put pressure on manufacturers.&nbsp;According to a recent report by J.P. Morgan Chase, average discounts on vehicles reached a record high of 16.8 per cent in April, nearly double the 8.3 per cent discount seen in 2024 overall. This aggressive price war has slashed profit margins for most EV makers to around 10 per cent this year, a significant decline from about 20 per cent just four years ago.The situation is worsened by the fact that only three out of more than 50 EV manufacturers in China—BYD, Li Auto, and Seres—are currently profitable. These companies, along with a handful of others, are navigating a brutally competitive market that has made it more difficult to balance development and marketing costs while maintaining any semblance of profitability.&nbsp;Small players struggling&nbsp;As the price war intensifies, many smaller EV startups are struggling to survive. With a combination of high development costs, increased marketing spend, and shrinking margins, many smaller manufacturers have yet to post a profit. The situation has led analysts to predict consolidation in the sector, with smaller players likely to be either acquired or forced out of the market altogether.In response to the mounting pressure, several of China’s four major publicly traded premium EV makers—including Nio, Xpeng, Geely’s Zeekr unit, and Stellantis-backed Leapmotor—have announced restructuring plans to stem their losses.Despite these financial challenges, the Chinese government has not been able to rein in the price war. Industry officials and the government in Beijing have called for an end to the price war, but the market has failed to respond. Even with calls for price discipline, the brutal discounts continue, and there has been little sign of a significant surge in demand for EVs.&nbsp;Exports provide a potential lifeline&nbsp;While domestic pressures remain severe, Chinese EV manufacturers have found some relief in export markets. The demand for Chinese-made electric cars abroad has been growing steadily, with EVs accounting for 33 per cent of China’s total vehicle exports in the first four months of 2025. This figure is up from around 25 per cent in the past two years. In April, pure electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles accounted for 38 per cent of the country’s outbound shipments.Analysts believe that exports could help shore up profitability for Chinese EV manufacturers in the face of fierce domestic competition.&nbsp;JPMorgan has forecast that Chinese EVs will comprise 80 per cent of China's car market by 2030, a significant leap from the 43 per cent share they held between January and April of 2025. However, even as exports rise, the path to profitability for domestic EV makers remains a challenge.&nbsp;BYD changing gears quickly&nbsp;Amid these financial pressures, BYD, China’s largest electric vehicle assembler, is attempting to stay ahead of the competition by offering advanced autonomous driving features in many of its models, including those priced as low as $9,555. BYD has rolled out its “God’s Eye” advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) across nearly all its models priced above 100,000 yuan ($13,688), including some of its most affordable vehicles like the Seagull, which starts at just 69,800 yuan.This move, which undercuts competitors such as Tesla, has sparked excitement in the market, as analysts believe it could help BYD differentiate itself and avoid the margins squeeze currently affecting many of its rivals.&nbsp;BYD’s founder, Wang Chuanfu, has even suggested that smart driving features could become as essential as seatbelts or airbags in the future, further cementing the company's position as a leader in the EV sector. However, other manufacturers, including Xpeng, will face tremendous pressure to keep up with these advancements, especially given BYD’s ability to offer such technologies at lower price points.&nbsp;The road ahead for China's EV makers&nbsp;Despite the intense price war and declining margins, there is a clear path forward for Chinese EV makers. Experts believe that exports will be crucial for the future profitability of Chinese manufacturers. Meanwhile, the continued rise of smart driving and technological innovations from companies like BYD could help drive sales in both domestic and international markets.Nevertheless, the short-term outlook for Chinese EV manufacturers remains clouded. With most players in the sector struggling to achieve profitability, the ongoing price war shows little sign of abating, leaving many smaller firms vulnerable. As the market consolidates, it will be interesting to see whether the winners of the EV battle will be those who can offer affordable prices or those who can innovate and bring new technologies to the table.

Average discounts on vehicles in China reached a record high of 16.8 per cent in April, nearly double the 8.3 per cent discount seen in 2024 overall. This aggressive price war has slashed profit margins for most EV makers to around 10 per cent this year.

China’s electric vehicle (EV) industry is facing significant challenges as fierce price competition, declining profit margins, and mounting costs put pressure on manufacturers. According to a recent report by J.P. Morgan Chase, average discounts on vehicles reached a record high of 16.8 per cent in April, nearly double the 8.3 per cent discount seen in 2024 overall. This aggressive price war has slashed profit margins for most EV makers to around 10 per cent this year, a significant decline from about 20 per cent just four years ago. The situation is worsened by the fact that only three out of more than 50 EV manufacturers in China—BYD, Li Auto, and Seres—are currently profitable. These companies, along with a handful of others, are navigating a brutally competitive market that has made it more difficult to balance development and marketing costs while maintaining any semblance of profitability. Small players struggling As the price war intensifies, many smaller EV startups are struggling to survive. With a combination of high development costs, increased marketing spend, and shrinking margins, many smaller manufacturers have yet to post a profit. The situation has led analysts to predict consolidation in the sector, with smaller players likely to be either acquired or forced out of the market altogether. In response to the mounting pressure, several of China’s four major publicly traded premium EV makers—including Nio, Xpeng, Geely’s Zeekr unit, and Stellantis-backed Leapmotor—have announced restructuring plans to stem their losses. Despite these financial challenges, the Chinese government has not been able to rein in the price war. Industry officials and the government in Beijing have called for an end to the price war, but the market has failed to respond. Even with calls for price discipline, the brutal discounts continue, and there has been little sign of a significant surge in demand for EVs. Exports provide a potential lifeline While domestic pressures remain severe, Chinese EV manufacturers have found some relief in export markets. The demand for Chinese-made electric cars abroad has been growing steadily, with EVs accounting for 33 per cent of China’s total vehicle exports in the first four months of 2025. This figure is up from around 25 per cent in the past two years. In April, pure electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles accounted for 38 per cent of the country’s outbound shipments. Analysts believe that exports could help shore up profitability for Chinese EV manufacturers in the face of fierce domestic competition. JPMorgan has forecast that Chinese EVs will comprise 80 per cent of China's car market by 2030, a significant leap from the 43 per cent share they held between January and April of 2025. However, even as exports rise, the path to profitability for domestic EV makers remains a challenge. BYD changing gears quickly Amid these financial pressures, BYD, China’s largest electric vehicle assembler, is attempting to stay ahead of the competition by offering advanced autonomous driving features in many of its models, including those priced as low as $9,555. BYD has rolled out its “God’s Eye” advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) across nearly all its models priced above 100,000 yuan ($13,688), including some of its most affordable vehicles like the Seagull, which starts at just 69,800 yuan. This move, which undercuts competitors such as Tesla, has sparked excitement in the market, as analysts believe it could help BYD differentiate itself and avoid the margins squeeze currently affecting many of its rivals. BYD’s founder, Wang Chuanfu, has even suggested that smart driving features could become as essential as seatbelts or airbags in the future, further cementing the company's position as a leader in the EV sector. However, other manufacturers, including Xpeng, will face tremendous pressure to keep up with these advancements, especially given BYD’s ability to offer such technologies at lower price points. The road ahead for China's EV makers Despite the intense price war and declining margins, there is a clear path forward for Chinese EV makers. Experts believe that exports will be crucial for the future profitability of Chinese manufacturers. Meanwhile, the continued rise of smart driving and technological innovations from companies like BYD could help drive sales in both domestic and international markets. Nevertheless, the short-term outlook for Chinese EV manufacturers remains clouded. With most players in the sector struggling to achieve profitability, the ongoing price war shows little sign of abating, leaving many smaller firms vulnerable. As the market consolidates, it will be interesting to see whether the winners of the EV battle will be those who can offer affordable prices or those who can innovate and bring new technologies to the table.

Average discounts on vehicles in China reached a record high of 16.8 per cent in April, nearly double the 8.3 per cent discount seen in 2024 overall. This aggressive price war has slashed profit margins for most EV makers to around 10 per cent this year.

Price cuts and declining profitability weigh on China's electric vehicle industry

US President Donald Trump’s flagship budget plan, dubbed the “big, beautiful” bill, faces stiff opposition from within his own party as Republicans remain deeply divided over its provisions. &nbsp;Despite Trump’s personal intervention on Capitol Hill on Tuesday to rally support, significant dissent persists ahead of a crucial House vote reportedly expected later this week.<h2>What is the ‘big, beautiful’ bill?</h2>&nbsp;The sprawling 1,116-page legislation aims to extend and expand the 2017 Trump tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, raise the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $30,000 for couples, and introduce new work requirements for Medicaid recipients.&nbsp;&nbsp;It also proposes rescinding green energy subsidies and increasing the child tax credit.&nbsp;The bill includes approximately $4.9 trillion in tax breaks, partially offset by $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, according to Reuters.<h2>Four major sticking points</h2>Despite passing the committee stage, the legislation is caught in a tug-of-war between conservative hardliners demanding steeper cuts and moderates protecting their constituents’ interests. These are the four most contentious areas: &nbsp;1. How deep should the cuts go?&nbsp;A central issue is how much to reduce federal spending. The bill’s $4.9 trillion in tax breaks—partly paid for by cutting healthcare and clean energy incentives. It has also alarmed fiscal conservatives who say the reductions don’t go far enough to tackle the US’s $36 trillion national debt.&nbsp;Texas Republican Chip Roy criticised the proposal, saying, “The bill does not yet meet the moment. We can and must do better before we pass the final product,” Bloomberg reported.&nbsp;2. Medicaid work requirements spark sharp debate&nbsp;The bill proposes significant changes to Medicaid, the federal health programme for low-income Americans.&nbsp;&nbsp;Starting in 2029, able-bodied adults would need to work at least 80 hours per month or engage in community service to remain eligible. &nbsp;Hardline Republicans want these requirements to begin immediately. Congressman Ralph Norman of South Carolina and others have called for stricter enforcement and faster implementation.&nbsp;&nbsp;They also seek to bar undocumented immigrants from receiving any Medicaid benefits.&nbsp;But moderates like Missouri Senator Josh Hawley are pushing back. Writing in The New York Times, he called the cuts “morally wrong and politically suicidal,” warning that millions of constituents could lose access to essential healthcare. &nbsp;Representative Andy Harris, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, also expressed concerns, telling Reuters that “the president, I don’t think, convinced enough people that the bill is adequate the way it is.”&nbsp;President Trump, meanwhile, has warned Republican lawmakers against imposing stricter Medicaid work requirements, stressing the need to cut “waste, fraud, and abuse” rather than benefits, the New York Post reported.&nbsp;3. State and local tax (SALT) deductions divide Republicans&nbsp;The bill raises the cap on state and local tax deductions, commonly known as SALT, from $10,000 to $30,000 for couples. However, lawmakers from high-tax states such as New York, California, and New Jersey say this doesn’t go far enough. &nbsp;In a joint statement, New York Republicans Elise Stefanik, Andrew Garbarino, Nick LaLota, and Mike Lawler called the proposal “insulting.” They are pushing for the cap to be raised to $62,000 for individuals and $124,000 for couples. &nbsp;“While I respect the president, I’m not budging on it,” Lawler told the BBC. “As it stands right now, I do not support the bill.”&nbsp;Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis, also from New York, who was previously sceptical about the SALT provisions, said she is satisfied with the current compromise. “They’re fighting for their districts, and they should be, but when it comes time to vote for the bill, it’s get the best deal possible and vote for the bill,” she told Reuters.&nbsp;House Republican leaders are reportedly seeking a compromise to raise the SALT cap to $40,000 for individuals and $80,000 for joint filers, though this falls short of the $62,000 some lawmakers demand, Bloomberg reported.&nbsp;4. Food assistance reforms raise humanitarian concerns&nbsp;The legislation also seeks major reforms to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP), which currently supports over 42 million Americans.&nbsp; Under the proposal, states would be required to fund 5 per cent of benefit costs and 75 per cent of administrative expenses or costs they currently do not bear. Work requirements for SNAP recipients would also be expanded, applying to individuals without dependents up to age 64 (currently capped at 54). Republicans argue this will reduce fraud and encourage employment, while Democrats claim it will push millions into food insecurity. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin described the proposal as “a slap in the face” to struggling families, according to Bloomberg.<h2>Trump’s push for unity amid party divisions</h2> On Tuesday, Trump left the White House for Capitol Hill in an effort to mend fractured party support, calling the gathering “a meeting of love” with “great unity in that room” after addressing House Republicans, Reuters reported. Despite his assurances, division remains, especially over Medicaid and SALT deductions. Trump reportedly cautioned Congressman Lawler against pushing for a higher SALT cap, warning it could threaten GOP unity, Reuters added. The bill narrowly passed the House Budget Committee on Sunday with a 17-16 vote but still requires full House approval, expected on Wednesday or Thursday.&nbsp; With a narrow Republican majority and no Democratic support, the bill’s fate remains uncertain, Bloomberg reported. If it clears the House, the bill will head to the Senate, where further amendments are anticipated. Several Republican senators have already voiced concern over Medicaid cuts and the SALT deduction cap, Reuters reported.&nbsp;As the May 26 deadline approaches, President Trump is intensifying efforts to unify his party behind the bill, underscoring the need to prevent tax increases and reduce government spending, Reuters added. &nbsp;

Business & Economy: Trump’s $4.9 trillion tax plan faces backlash from Republicans over healthcare and tax deduction reforms as the House prepares for a critical vote.

US President Donald Trump’s flagship budget plan, dubbed the “big, beautiful” bill, faces stiff opposition from within his own party as Republicans remain deeply divided over its provisions. Despite Trump’s personal intervention on Capitol Hill on Tuesday to rally support, significant dissent persists ahead of a crucial House vote reportedly expected later this week. What is the ‘big, beautiful’ bill? The sprawling 1,116-page legislation aims to extend and expand the 2017 Trump tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, raise the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $30,000 for couples, and introduce new work requirements for Medicaid recipients. It also proposes rescinding green energy subsidies and increasing the child tax credit. The bill includes approximately $4.9 trillion in tax breaks, partially offset by $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, according to Reuters. Four major sticking points Despite passing the committee stage, the legislation is caught in a tug-of-war between conservative hardliners demanding steeper cuts and moderates protecting their constituents’ interests. These are the four most contentious areas: 1. How deep should the cuts go? A central issue is how much to reduce federal spending. The bill’s $4.9 trillion in tax breaks—partly paid for by cutting healthcare and clean energy incentives. It has also alarmed fiscal conservatives who say the reductions don’t go far enough to tackle the US’s $36 trillion national debt. Texas Republican Chip Roy criticised the proposal, saying, “The bill does not yet meet the moment. We can and must do better before we pass the final product,” Bloomberg reported. 2. Medicaid work requirements spark sharp debate The bill proposes significant changes to Medicaid, the federal health programme for low-income Americans. Starting in 2029, able-bodied adults would need to work at least 80 hours per month or engage in community service to remain eligible. Hardline Republicans want these requirements to begin immediately. Congressman Ralph Norman of South Carolina and others have called for stricter enforcement and faster implementation. They also seek to bar undocumented immigrants from receiving any Medicaid benefits. But moderates like Missouri Senator Josh Hawley are pushing back. Writing in The New York Times, he called the cuts “morally wrong and politically suicidal,” warning that millions of constituents could lose access to essential healthcare. Representative Andy Harris, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, also expressed concerns, telling Reuters that “the president, I don’t think, convinced enough people that the bill is adequate the way it is.” President Trump, meanwhile, has warned Republican lawmakers against imposing stricter Medicaid work requirements, stressing the need to cut “waste, fraud, and abuse” rather than benefits, the New York Post reported. 3. State and local tax (SALT) deductions divide Republicans The bill raises the cap on state and local tax deductions, commonly known as SALT, from $10,000 to $30,000 for couples. However, lawmakers from high-tax states such as New York, California, and New Jersey say this doesn’t go far enough. In a joint statement, New York Republicans Elise Stefanik, Andrew Garbarino, Nick LaLota, and Mike Lawler called the proposal “insulting.” They are pushing for the cap to be raised to $62,000 for individuals and $124,000 for couples. “While I respect the president, I’m not budging on it,” Lawler told the BBC. “As it stands right now, I do not support the bill.” Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis, also from New York, who was previously sceptical about the SALT provisions, said she is satisfied with the current compromise. “They’re fighting for their districts, and they should be, but when it comes time to vote for the bill, it’s get the best deal possible and vote for the bill,” she told Reuters. House Republican leaders are reportedly seeking a compromise to raise the SALT cap to $40,000 for individuals and $80,000 for joint filers, though this falls short of the $62,000 some lawmakers demand, Bloomberg reported. 4. Food assistance reforms raise humanitarian concerns The legislation also seeks major reforms to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP), which currently supports over 42 million Americans. Under the proposal, states would be required to fund 5 per cent of benefit costs and 75 per cent of administrative expenses or costs they currently do not bear. Work requirements for SNAP recipients would also be expanded, applying to individuals without dependents up to age 64 (currently capped at 54). Republicans argue this will reduce fraud and encourage employment, while Democrats claim it will push millions into food insecurity. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin described the proposal as “a slap in the face” to struggling families, according to Bloomberg. Trump’s push for unity amid party divisions On Tuesday, Trump left the White House for Capitol Hill in an effort to mend fractured party support, calling the gathering “a meeting of love” with “great unity in that room” after addressing House Republicans, Reuters reported. Despite his assurances, division remains, especially over Medicaid and SALT deductions. Trump reportedly cautioned Congressman Lawler against pushing for a higher SALT cap, warning it could threaten GOP unity, Reuters added. The bill narrowly passed the House Budget Committee on Sunday with a 17-16 vote but still requires full House approval, expected on Wednesday or Thursday. With a narrow Republican majority and no Democratic support, the bill’s fate remains uncertain, Bloomberg reported. If it clears the House, the bill will head to the Senate, where further amendments are anticipated. Several Republican senators have already voiced concern over Medicaid cuts and the SALT deduction cap, Reuters reported. As the May 26 deadline approaches, President Trump is intensifying efforts to unify his party behind the bill, underscoring the need to prevent tax increases and reduce government spending, Reuters added.

US President Donald Trump’s massive 1,100-page ‘big beautiful’ bill aims to revive his 2017 tax agenda but has exposed sharp divides within the GOP over Medicaid work rules, SALT caps, and food aid reforms.

What is Trump’s ‘big beautiful’ bill that’s dividing Republicans?

Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, has indicated that he plans to scale back his political donations in the future, marking a significant shift in his previously high-profile role as a financial backer of Republican causes, including President Donald Trump.Speaking during a video interview at the Qatar Economic Forum, Musk announced that he would be doing “a lot less” political spending going forward, citing that he had “done enough” in the political arena.Musk’s comments, made on May 20, come after a year of extensive political donations, where he contributed more than $250 million in support of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, as well as Republican-backed causes.His political influence peaked with his involvement in various election campaigns, including a $25 million donation in a bid to sway the Wisconsin Supreme Court race. However, the political strategy backfired when Musk’s chosen candidate lost, and his growing influence became a liability, leading some Republicans to question the billionaire’s impact.&nbsp;Focus shifts to Tesla&nbsp;Musk’s remarks signal a retreat from the political stage as he turns his attention back to his business interests, particularly Tesla. He emphasised that he was committed to the electric vehicle company for at least another five years, despite ongoing challenges.Tesla’s stock has been under pressure, down 14 per cent this year, and sales have been in decline, particularly in Europe. However, Musk remains optimistic, stating that Tesla’s sales are “doing well” and that he doesn’t anticipate any “meaningful sales shortfall”. His reassurance that “it’s already turned around” comes despite the public concerns over Tesla’s performance in key markets.Musk also downplayed fears that his political activities had damaged Tesla’s brand, particularly among left-leaning consumers. He claimed that while some buyers had turned away from the company due to his political affiliations, Tesla had gained support from other demographics, particularly those on the political right.The CEO made it clear that he was not bothered by any negative media coverage against his companies. He criticised the protesters, calling their actions “evil” and stating that many would face prison time for vandalising Tesla’s property.As Musk navigates the public backlash, his focus on maintaining control over Tesla’s future is evident. He reiterated that his interest in owning more shares of the company was not driven by financial gain but by a desire for greater authority in shaping its direction. “It’s not a money thing. It’s a reasonable control thing,” Musk said.&nbsp;Future plans&nbsp;While Musk’s attention remains on Tesla, his other major business, SpaceX, also continues to perform well. Musk spoke about the possibility of spinning off the Starlink satellite internet business but made it clear that he was in no rush to do so.He acknowledged that going public could raise capital but would come with significant overhead costs and the potential for lawsuits. Musk also touched on his role in government initiatives, particularly the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he has faced both praise and criticism. While Musk defended the department’s efforts, he acknowledged that its influence over federal spending had been limited.Musk's relationship with the political sphere has clearly evolved. Once a key ally to Trump, he now says he plans to spend less on political causes unless a compelling reason arises in the future.“If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it,” Musk stated, although he seemed uninterested in pursuing further political donations at the moment. His pivot away from politics marks a noticeable shift from his earlier zeal for using his wealth and influence to shape the political landscape.&nbsp;Critique of critics&nbsp;During the same interview, Musk took aim at critics such as Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who had questioned Musk’s political spending and the impact of his cost-cutting measures. Musk denied that his spending cuts would harm vulnerable populations, a point raised by Gates in recent interviews. He also lashed out at the media, accusing them of undermining his leadership and distorting his intentions.Despite the controversy surrounding his political and business activities, Musk remains confident in his future leadership role at Tesla and his ability to navigate the challenges ahead. As he continues to manage multiple high-profile ventures, the billionaire appears to be focusing on a balance between his corporate responsibilities and a reduced political footprint.

Musk’s come after a year of extensive political donations, where he contributed more than $250 million in support of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, as well as Republican-backed causes.

Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, has indicated that he plans to scale back his political donations in the future, marking a significant shift in his previously high-profile role as a financial backer of Republican causes, including President Donald Trump. Speaking during a video interview at the Qatar Economic Forum, Musk announced that he would be doing “a lot less” political spending going forward, citing that he had “done enough” in the political arena. Musk’s comments, made on May 20, come after a year of extensive political donations, where he contributed more than $250 million in support of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, as well as Republican-backed causes. His political influence peaked with his involvement in various election campaigns, including a $25 million donation in a bid to sway the Wisconsin Supreme Court race. However, the political strategy backfired when Musk’s chosen candidate lost, and his growing influence became a liability, leading some Republicans to question the billionaire’s impact. Focus shifts to Tesla Musk’s remarks signal a retreat from the political stage as he turns his attention back to his business interests, particularly Tesla. He emphasised that he was committed to the electric vehicle company for at least another five years, despite ongoing challenges. Tesla’s stock has been under pressure, down 14 per cent this year, and sales have been in decline, particularly in Europe. However, Musk remains optimistic, stating that Tesla’s sales are “doing well” and that he doesn’t anticipate any “meaningful sales shortfall”. His reassurance that “it’s already turned around” comes despite the public concerns over Tesla’s performance in key markets. Musk also downplayed fears that his political activities had damaged Tesla’s brand, particularly among left-leaning consumers. He claimed that while some buyers had turned away from the company due to his political affiliations, Tesla had gained support from other demographics, particularly those on the political right. The CEO made it clear that he was not bothered by any negative media coverage against his companies. He criticised the protesters, calling their actions “evil” and stating that many would face prison time for vandalising Tesla’s property. As Musk navigates the public backlash, his focus on maintaining control over Tesla’s future is evident. He reiterated that his interest in owning more shares of the company was not driven by financial gain but by a desire for greater authority in shaping its direction. “It’s not a money thing. It’s a reasonable control thing,” Musk said. Future plans While Musk’s attention remains on Tesla, his other major business, SpaceX, also continues to perform well. Musk spoke about the possibility of spinning off the Starlink satellite internet business but made it clear that he was in no rush to do so. He acknowledged that going public could raise capital but would come with significant overhead costs and the potential for lawsuits. Musk also touched on his role in government initiatives, particularly the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he has faced both praise and criticism. While Musk defended the department’s efforts, he acknowledged that its influence over federal spending had been limited. Musk's relationship with the political sphere has clearly evolved. Once a key ally to Trump, he now says he plans to spend less on political causes unless a compelling reason arises in the future. “If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it,” Musk stated, although he seemed uninterested in pursuing further political donations at the moment. His pivot away from politics marks a noticeable shift from his earlier zeal for using his wealth and influence to shape the political landscape. Critique of critics During the same interview, Musk took aim at critics such as Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who had questioned Musk’s political spending and the impact of his cost-cutting measures. Musk denied that his spending cuts would harm vulnerable populations, a point raised by Gates in recent interviews. He also lashed out at the media, accusing them of undermining his leadership and distorting his intentions. Despite the controversy surrounding his political and business activities, Musk remains confident in his future leadership role at Tesla and his ability to navigate the challenges ahead. As he continues to manage multiple high-profile ventures, the billionaire appears to be focusing on a balance between his corporate responsibilities and a reduced political footprint.

Musk’s come after a year of extensive political donations, where he contributed more than $250 million in support of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, as well as Republican-backed causes.

Elon Musk plans to cut back political spending, shifts focus to Tesla

Beijing has issued a stern warning to companies and individuals who implement recent US restrictions targeting Chinese AI chips, threatening legal consequences as the tech standoff between the two economic superpowers escalates. According to Reuters, China’s Commerce Ministry stated that those enforcing the latest US guidance on chip usage may face “corresponding legal liabilities”. The ministry accused the United States of enacting “discriminatory restrictive measures” against Chinese technology firms.&nbsp;The warning follows new US guidance last week, advising companies against using Ascend AI chips developed by Huawei’s Shenzhen-based unit, citing potential violations of US export control laws. These chips, critical to China’s AI ambitions, are the latest flashpoint in the intensifying tech war between Washington and Beijing. &nbsp;A ministry spokesperson, quoted by Reuters, urged the US to “abide by international economic and trade rules” and to respect other nations’ right to technological progress.&nbsp;US-China chip &amp; AI tensions&nbsp;The legal threat is the latest salvo in a broader power struggle that has seen semiconductors evolve from commercial commodities to national security assets.&nbsp;As reported by the US Department of Commerce, Washington has implemented a series of restrictions aimed at limiting China’s access to advanced chipmaking tools and design software.&nbsp;&nbsp;These steps are part of a national security strategy to contain Beijing’s progress in sensitive areas like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and cyber warfare.&nbsp;In response, Chinese state media including Xinhua have outlined government-led efforts to boost domestic semiconductor production, with billions of dollars being poured into homegrown alternatives.&nbsp; &nbsp;At the heart of this push lies Huawei’s Ascend chip series, which industry analysts at Counterpoint Research say could rival offerings from US firms like NVIDIA in the coming years.&nbsp;According to Huawei’s product data, the Ascend chips power everything from data centers to deep learning algorithms, making them central to China’s ambition to dominate the AI race. For the US, however, that dominance poses a strategic threat.&nbsp;Trump tariff fiasco&nbsp;&nbsp;The chip showdown unfolds against a backdrop of prolonged trade hostilities. President Donald Trump this year reintroduced steep tariffs on Chinese goods, reigniting fears of another full-blown trade war.&nbsp;As reported by Bloomberg, the United States had imposed a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles, citing unfair subsidies and market distortion. In retaliation, China’s Finance Ministry responded with 125 per cent tariffs on key US exports, including agricultural products and microchips.&nbsp;The escalation led to urgent high-level negotiations in Geneva. According to Bloomberg, the two sides have since agreed to a temporary 90-day truce, effective immediately.&nbsp;&nbsp;The US has cut tariffs on Chinese goods from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, while China has lowered its tariffs on US goods from 125 per cent to 10 per cent.&nbsp;&nbsp;These concessions were brokered during talks between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng.&nbsp;The agreement also includes the suspension of certain non-tariff retaliatory measures.&nbsp;&nbsp;However, tariffs tied to sensitive issues, such as those concerning fentanyl components and farm subsidies remain in effect.&nbsp;What lies ahead?&nbsp; &nbsp;Beijing’s threat of legal retaliation over chip restrictions suggests that even with lowered tariffs, tensions are far from resolved. The latest developments indicate that economic interdependence has taken a backseat to strategic competition. &nbsp;As both sides navigate this 90-day window, analysts warn that failure to reach broader consensus could trigger a renewed cycle of retaliatory measures, disrupting global supply chains, spooking markets, and stalling innovation.&nbsp;With global tech firms and investors watching closely, the outcome of these negotiations may well shape the future of international trade, innovation, and digital power structures for years to come.&nbsp;

Beijing legal warning comes amid the growing tech tensions as US and China agree to slash tariffs in a 90-day truce brokered in Geneva, offering temporary relief to global markets.

Beijing has issued a stern warning to companies and individuals who implement recent US restrictions targeting Chinese AI chips, threatening legal consequences as the tech standoff between the two economic superpowers escalates. According to Reuters, China’s Commerce Ministry stated that those enforcing the latest US guidance on chip usage may face “corresponding legal liabilities”. The ministry accused the United States of enacting “discriminatory restrictive measures” against Chinese technology firms. The warning follows new US guidance last week, advising companies against using Ascend AI chips developed by Huawei’s Shenzhen-based unit, citing potential violations of US export control laws. These chips, critical to China’s AI ambitions, are the latest flashpoint in the intensifying tech war between Washington and Beijing. A ministry spokesperson, quoted by Reuters, urged the US to “abide by international economic and trade rules” and to respect other nations’ right to technological progress. US-China chip & AI tensions The legal threat is the latest salvo in a broader power struggle that has seen semiconductors evolve from commercial commodities to national security assets. As reported by the US Department of Commerce, Washington has implemented a series of restrictions aimed at limiting China’s access to advanced chipmaking tools and design software. These steps are part of a national security strategy to contain Beijing’s progress in sensitive areas like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and cyber warfare. In response, Chinese state media including Xinhua have outlined government-led efforts to boost domestic semiconductor production, with billions of dollars being poured into homegrown alternatives. At the heart of this push lies Huawei’s Ascend chip series, which industry analysts at Counterpoint Research say could rival offerings from US firms like NVIDIA in the coming years. According to Huawei’s product data, the Ascend chips power everything from data centers to deep learning algorithms, making them central to China’s ambition to dominate the AI race. For the US, however, that dominance poses a strategic threat. Trump tariff fiasco The chip showdown unfolds against a backdrop of prolonged trade hostilities. President Donald Trump this year reintroduced steep tariffs on Chinese goods, reigniting fears of another full-blown trade war. As reported by Bloomberg, the United States had imposed a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles, citing unfair subsidies and market distortion. In retaliation, China’s Finance Ministry responded with 125 per cent tariffs on key US exports, including agricultural products and microchips. The escalation led to urgent high-level negotiations in Geneva. According to Bloomberg, the two sides have since agreed to a temporary 90-day truce, effective immediately. The US has cut tariffs on Chinese goods from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, while China has lowered its tariffs on US goods from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. These concessions were brokered during talks between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng. The agreement also includes the suspension of certain non-tariff retaliatory measures. However, tariffs tied to sensitive issues, such as those concerning fentanyl components and farm subsidies remain in effect. What lies ahead? Beijing’s threat of legal retaliation over chip restrictions suggests that even with lowered tariffs, tensions are far from resolved. The latest developments indicate that economic interdependence has taken a backseat to strategic competition. As both sides navigate this 90-day window, analysts warn that failure to reach broader consensus could trigger a renewed cycle of retaliatory measures, disrupting global supply chains, spooking markets, and stalling innovation. With global tech firms and investors watching closely, the outcome of these negotiations may well shape the future of international trade, innovation, and digital power structures for years to come.

China has threatened legal retaliation against companies complying with US chip curbs, signalling a fresh flashpoint in the US-China tech conflict.

China threatens legal action over US chip curbs amid 90-day tariff truce

Beijing condemned on Wednesday new US warnings on the use of AI chips made in China, vowing it would take steps against "bullying" efforts to restrict access to high-tech semiconductors and supply chains.Washington has sought in recent years to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China, concerned that they could be used to advance Beijing's military systems and otherwise undermine American dominance in AI.US President Donald Trump's administration last week rescinded some export controls on advanced computing semiconductors, answering calls by countries that said they were being shut out from crucial technology needed to develop artificial intelligence.Some US lawmakers feared the restrictions would have incentivised countries to go to China for AI chips, spurring the superpower's development of state-of-the-art technology.But Washington also unveiled fresh guidelines warning firms that using Chinese-made high-tech AI semiconductors, specifically tech giant Huawei's Ascend chips, would put them at risk of violating US export controls.In a statement Wednesday, Beijing's commerce ministry described the warnings as "typical unilateral bullying and protectionism, which seriously undermine the stability of the global semiconductor industry chain and supply chain".China accused the US of "abusing export controls to suppress and contain China"."These actions seriously harm the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and endanger China's development interests," the commerce ministry said.It also warned that "any organisation or individual that enforces or assists in enforcing such measures" could be in violation of Chinese law.And it vowed to take "firm steps to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests" in response.The United States warned last week about the potential consequences of allowing US AI chips to be used for training Chinese AI models.The commerce department said its policy was aimed at sharing American AI technology "with trusted foreign countries around the world, while keeping the technology out of the hands of our adversaries".Previous US rules divided countries into three tiers, each with its own level of restrictions.Top-tier countries like Japan and South Korea faced no export restrictions, while countries in the second tier, which included Mexico and Portugal, saw a cap on the chips they could receive.Chipmakers including Nvidia and AMD lobbied against the tiered restrictions and saw their share prices rise when the Trump administration indicated it would rethink the rule.

"These actions seriously harm the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and endanger China's development interests," said China's commerce ministry.

Beijing condemned on Wednesday new US warnings on the use of AI chips made in China, vowing it would take steps against "bullying" efforts to restrict access to high-tech semiconductors and supply chains. Washington has sought in recent years to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China, concerned that they could be used to advance Beijing's military systems and otherwise undermine American dominance in AI. US President Donald Trump's administration last week rescinded some export controls on advanced computing semiconductors, answering calls by countries that said they were being shut out from crucial technology needed to develop artificial intelligence. Some US lawmakers feared the restrictions would have incentivised countries to go to China for AI chips, spurring the superpower's development of state-of-the-art technology. But Washington also unveiled fresh guidelines warning firms that using Chinese-made high-tech AI semiconductors, specifically tech giant Huawei's Ascend chips, would put them at risk of violating US export controls. In a statement Wednesday, Beijing's commerce ministry described the warnings as "typical unilateral bullying and protectionism, which seriously undermine the stability of the global semiconductor industry chain and supply chain". China accused the US of "abusing export controls to suppress and contain China". "These actions seriously harm the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and endanger China's development interests," the commerce ministry said. It also warned that "any organisation or individual that enforces or assists in enforcing such measures" could be in violation of Chinese law. And it vowed to take "firm steps to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests" in response. The United States warned last week about the potential consequences of allowing US AI chips to be used for training Chinese AI models. The commerce department said its policy was aimed at sharing American AI technology "with trusted foreign countries around the world, while keeping the technology out of the hands of our adversaries". Previous US rules divided countries into three tiers, each with its own level of restrictions. Top-tier countries like Japan and South Korea faced no export restrictions, while countries in the second tier, which included Mexico and Portugal, saw a cap on the chips they could receive. Chipmakers including Nvidia and AMD lobbied against the tiered restrictions and saw their share prices rise when the Trump administration indicated it would rethink the rule.

"These actions seriously harm the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and endanger China's development interests," said China's commerce ministry.

China slams US over chip warning, claims America 'abusing export controls to suppress and contain' Beijing

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has commenced a fresh review of its $15.5 billion support programme for Ukraine, a country still reeling from over three years of war.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, an IMF delegation arrived in Kyiv on Tuesday to conduct the eighth assessment under its four-year Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement.&nbsp;&nbsp;The discussions will centre on Ukraine’s budgetary challenges, long-term economic reforms, and strategies to ensure debt sustainability.&nbsp;Ukraine’s Central Bank Governor, Andriy Pyshnyi, described the talks as “constructive and substantive”, adding that the IMF programme remains a vital source of economic resilience during the ongoing conflict.&nbsp; According to Reuters, the IMF team will also explore how Kyiv plans to fund its wartime budget, including through international assistance and domestic revenue mobilisation.&nbsp;While Ukraine has secured the financial resources needed to cover its 2025 budget deficit, estimated at nearly $38 billion, questions remain over the availability of global aid beyond this year.&nbsp;&nbsp;Most of the country’s domestic income is being used to fund defence operations, leaving Kyiv heavily dependent on Western partners to finance social and humanitarian spending.&nbsp;In addition to budgetary matters, the IMF will also assess the strength of Ukraine’s financial sector. Pyshnyi noted that talks will include improving regulations governing credit bureaus and enhancing financial market infrastructure measures seen as essential to preserving monetary stability in wartime conditions.&nbsp;Impact of war on Ukraine’s economy&nbsp;&nbsp;The IMF’s latest review comes against the backdrop of a severely weakened economy. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine’s economic output has suffered a dramatic collapse.&nbsp;&nbsp;As reported by Reuters, gross domestic product (GDP) dropped by nearly 30 per cent in the first year of the war.&nbsp;&nbsp;Although modest growth was recorded in 2023 and 2024, Ukraine’s overall economic performance remains far below pre-war levels, according to World Bank&nbsp;estimates.&nbsp;The toll of the war extends far beyond GDP figures. Millions of Ukrainians have been forced to flee their homes, either relocating abroad or becoming internally displaced.&nbsp;&nbsp;The country’s physical infrastructure has also been severely damaged, with cities, industrial areas, transport networks, and energy systems targeted by missile strikes. The Kyiv School of Economics-estimates&nbsp;the total cost of war-inflicted damage to infrastructure and housing has exceeded $150 billion.&nbsp;Once a major agricultural exporter, Ukraine has struggled to maintain its role as a global grain supplier due to damaged ports and disrupted trade routes.&nbsp;&nbsp;These supply chain blockages have fuelled inflation and weakened government revenues.&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, repeated attacks on the power grid have led to frequent electricity shortages, hindering industrial activity and daily life.&nbsp;The war has also placed Ukraine’s banking sector under immense pressure. Challenges such as rising non-performing loans, capital flight, and inflationary instability have further underlined the importance of IMF support and broader international aid.&nbsp;&nbsp;For now, financial assistance from partners remains Ukraine’s primary cushion against economic collapse.&nbsp;With international focus shifting to other geopolitical flashpoints, concerns are growing over whether donors will maintain the same level of commitment to Ukraine in 2026 and beyond.&nbsp;&nbsp;The outcome of this IMF review could play a decisive role in shaping Ukraine’s financial future, determining not only the sustainability of its public finances but also its ability to function as a stable state during wartime.

The IMF review discussion will centre on Ukraine’s budgetary challenges, long-term economic reforms, and strategies to ensure debt sustainability.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has commenced a fresh review of its $15.5 billion support programme for Ukraine, a country still reeling from over three years of war. As per Reuters, an IMF delegation arrived in Kyiv on Tuesday to conduct the eighth assessment under its four-year Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement. The discussions will centre on Ukraine’s budgetary challenges, long-term economic reforms, and strategies to ensure debt sustainability. Ukraine’s Central Bank Governor, Andriy Pyshnyi, described the talks as “constructive and substantive”, adding that the IMF programme remains a vital source of economic resilience during the ongoing conflict. According to Reuters, the IMF team will also explore how Kyiv plans to fund its wartime budget, including through international assistance and domestic revenue mobilisation. While Ukraine has secured the financial resources needed to cover its 2025 budget deficit, estimated at nearly $38 billion, questions remain over the availability of global aid beyond this year. Most of the country’s domestic income is being used to fund defence operations, leaving Kyiv heavily dependent on Western partners to finance social and humanitarian spending. In addition to budgetary matters, the IMF will also assess the strength of Ukraine’s financial sector. Pyshnyi noted that talks will include improving regulations governing credit bureaus and enhancing financial market infrastructure measures seen as essential to preserving monetary stability in wartime conditions. Impact of war on Ukraine’s economy The IMF’s latest review comes against the backdrop of a severely weakened economy. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine’s economic output has suffered a dramatic collapse. As reported by Reuters, gross domestic product (GDP) dropped by nearly 30 per cent in the first year of the war. Although modest growth was recorded in 2023 and 2024, Ukraine’s overall economic performance remains far below pre-war levels, according to World Bank estimates. The toll of the war extends far beyond GDP figures. Millions of Ukrainians have been forced to flee their homes, either relocating abroad or becoming internally displaced. The country’s physical infrastructure has also been severely damaged, with cities, industrial areas, transport networks, and energy systems targeted by missile strikes. The Kyiv School of Economics-estimates the total cost of war-inflicted damage to infrastructure and housing has exceeded $150 billion. Once a major agricultural exporter, Ukraine has struggled to maintain its role as a global grain supplier due to damaged ports and disrupted trade routes. These supply chain blockages have fuelled inflation and weakened government revenues. Meanwhile, repeated attacks on the power grid have led to frequent electricity shortages, hindering industrial activity and daily life. The war has also placed Ukraine’s banking sector under immense pressure. Challenges such as rising non-performing loans, capital flight, and inflationary instability have further underlined the importance of IMF support and broader international aid. For now, financial assistance from partners remains Ukraine’s primary cushion against economic collapse. With international focus shifting to other geopolitical flashpoints, concerns are growing over whether donors will maintain the same level of commitment to Ukraine in 2026 and beyond. The outcome of this IMF review could play a decisive role in shaping Ukraine’s financial future, determining not only the sustainability of its public finances but also its ability to function as a stable state during wartime.

According to Reuters, The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has delegation arrived in Kyiv on Tuesday to commenced a fresh review of its $15.5 billion support programme for Ukraine.&nbsp;

IMF launches key review of Ukraine’s $15.5 billion loan as war-hit economy faces deepening strain

China’s smartphone exports to the US have plunged to their lowest level since 2011, reflecting a dramatic fallout from escalating trade tensions and renewed tariff threats.&nbsp;&nbsp;As global electronics supply chains recalibrate, India is fast emerging as the new pivot point in the tech manufacturing ecosystem.&nbsp;China’s smartphone exports to US declines&nbsp; In April 2025, China’s mobile phone shipments to the US plummeted 72 per cent year-on-year to $688.5 million, the lowest monthly figure since June 2011, according to China’s General Administration of Customs, as reported by Bloomberg and Trade Data Monitor.&nbsp;&nbsp;This collapse outpaced the 21 per cent overall drop in Chinese exports to the US in the same period, underscoring how high-tech goods are being disproportionately impacted.&nbsp;New data shows that smartphones led the decline in export value in April 2025, with a month-on-month drop of $1.8 billion. Other top tech categories saw steep falls as well:&nbsp;Top 10 Product Export Drops from China to US (April 2025, MoM change):&nbsp;<figure class="table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Product</td><td>Decline ($ Million)</td></tr><tr><td>Smartphones</td><td>-1800.0</td></tr><tr><td>Laptops</td><td>-260.0</td></tr><tr><td>Solid State Disks (SSD)</td><td>-156.9</td></tr><tr><td>Video Game Consoles</td><td>-135.9</td></tr><tr><td>Optical Communication Modules</td><td>-87.0</td></tr><tr><td>Plastic Products</td><td>-86.7</td></tr><tr><td>Toys</td><td>-80.9</td></tr><tr><td>PC Monitors</td><td>-79.9</td></tr><tr><td>Plastic Tableware &amp; Kitchenware</td><td>-73.7</td></tr><tr><td>Wireless Headphones</td><td>-63.6</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>(Source: China’s General Administration of Customs, Trade Data Monitor)&nbsp;US-China trade war saga&nbsp; The Trump administration has imposed tariffs of up to 145 per cent on select Chinese goods, including mobile phones and electronics, aiming to “protect American industry” and correct trade imbalances. However, analysts argue the levies are disrupting global tech supply chains, raising costs for US consumers, and forcing companies to rethink manufacturing strategies. According to Bloomberg, investors fear this new wave of tariffs could reignite a full-blown global trade war, decimating industries, and triggering inflation across key consumer markets. In a tit-for-tat response, China has rolled out its own reciprocal tariffs, targeting US exports like liquid petroleum gas, soybeans, gas turbines, and semiconductor machinery.&nbsp; These items were among the top American goods exported to China last year. Meanwhile, high-level trade negotiations in Geneva have hit a wall, with Beijing accusing Washington of sabotaging progress by announcing fresh sanctions on Huawei Technologies Co.’s AI chip units, just as the talks were underway. Both sides have agreed to a 90-day pause on new tariffs, but the underlying tensions remain unresolved. Analysts say the truce may only be “temporary relief, not a breakthrough.” The stakes are massive. In 2024, US-China bilateral trade totaled $690 billion, with smartphones, laptops, and lithium-ion batteries topping the list of US imports from China, according to Trade Data Monitor. That flow is now under direct threat. Tariff-led uncertainty is causing companies to hedge their bets—and China’s smartphone export data is one of the clearest signs yet. India emerges as the big winner As the US and China clash, India is emerging as a strategic alternative in global electronics manufacturing. Apple Inc. is accelerating its shift of iPhone production to India.&nbsp; According to China’s General Administration of Customs, the value of smartphone component exports from China to India has roughly quadrupled over the past year. India now hosts Apple’s largest iPhone production base outside of China, serving as a key assembly hub. More parts are being shipped from China to India, then exported to global markets including the US to bypass tariff penalties. But Trump has pushed back on this workaround, publicly urging Apple to “bring iPhone manufacturing home.” However, experts point out that iPhones have never been made in the US, and the infrastructure needed for such a shift is still years away. The 14-year low in smartphone exports signals more than just a trade slowdown, it represents a strategic decoupling in tech.&nbsp;&nbsp;With tariffs rising, trust fading, and sanctions increasing, the smartphone war could be just the beginning of a broader economic cold war.&nbsp;

The decline in smartphone export reflects a dramatic fallout from escalating trade tensions and renewed tariff threats. 

China’s smartphone exports to the US have plunged to their lowest level since 2011, reflecting a dramatic fallout from escalating trade tensions and renewed tariff threats. As global electronics supply chains recalibrate, India is fast emerging as the new pivot point in the tech manufacturing ecosystem. China’s smartphone exports to US declines In April 2025, China’s mobile phone shipments to the US plummeted 72 per cent year-on-year to $688.5 million, the lowest monthly figure since June 2011, according to China’s General Administration of Customs, as reported by Bloomberg and Trade Data Monitor. This collapse outpaced the 21 per cent overall drop in Chinese exports to the US in the same period, underscoring how high-tech goods are being disproportionately impacted. New data shows that smartphones led the decline in export value in April 2025, with a month-on-month drop of $1.8 billion. Other top tech categories saw steep falls as well: Top 10 Product Export Drops from China to US (April 2025, MoM change): Product Decline ($ Million) Smartphones -1800.0 Laptops -260.0 Solid State Disks (SSD) -156.9 Video Game Consoles -135.9 Optical Communication Modules -87.0 Plastic Products -86.7 Toys -80.9 PC Monitors -79.9 Plastic Tableware & Kitchenware -73.7 Wireless Headphones -63.6 (Source: China’s General Administration of Customs, Trade Data Monitor) US-China trade war saga The Trump administration has imposed tariffs of up to 145 per cent on select Chinese goods, including mobile phones and electronics, aiming to “protect American industry” and correct trade imbalances. However, analysts argue the levies are disrupting global tech supply chains, raising costs for US consumers, and forcing companies to rethink manufacturing strategies. According to Bloomberg, investors fear this new wave of tariffs could reignite a full-blown global trade war, decimating industries, and triggering inflation across key consumer markets. In a tit-for-tat response, China has rolled out its own reciprocal tariffs, targeting US exports like liquid petroleum gas, soybeans, gas turbines, and semiconductor machinery. These items were among the top American goods exported to China last year. Meanwhile, high-level trade negotiations in Geneva have hit a wall, with Beijing accusing Washington of sabotaging progress by announcing fresh sanctions on Huawei Technologies Co.’s AI chip units, just as the talks were underway. Both sides have agreed to a 90-day pause on new tariffs, but the underlying tensions remain unresolved. Analysts say the truce may only be “temporary relief, not a breakthrough.” The stakes are massive. In 2024, US-China bilateral trade totaled $690 billion, with smartphones, laptops, and lithium-ion batteries topping the list of US imports from China, according to Trade Data Monitor. That flow is now under direct threat. Tariff-led uncertainty is causing companies to hedge their bets—and China’s smartphone export data is one of the clearest signs yet. India emerges as the big winner As the US and China clash, India is emerging as a strategic alternative in global electronics manufacturing. Apple Inc. is accelerating its shift of iPhone production to India. According to China’s General Administration of Customs, the value of smartphone component exports from China to India has roughly quadrupled over the past year. India now hosts Apple’s largest iPhone production base outside of China, serving as a key assembly hub. More parts are being shipped from China to India, then exported to global markets including the US to bypass tariff penalties. But Trump has pushed back on this workaround, publicly urging Apple to “bring iPhone manufacturing home.” However, experts point out that iPhones have never been made in the US, and the infrastructure needed for such a shift is still years away. The 14-year low in smartphone exports signals more than just a trade slowdown, it represents a strategic decoupling in tech. With tariffs rising, trust fading, and sanctions increasing, the smartphone war could be just the beginning of a broader economic cold war.

Amid global trade tension due to Trump tariff, China’s smartphone exports to the US have plunged to their lowest level since 2011.&nbsp;

China’s smartphone exports to US crash to 14-year low amid trade war

Australia’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), on May 20 lowered its main cash rate by 25 basis points to a two-year low of 3.85 per cent.The decision, which marks the second rate cut this year, was driven by the uncertainty in the global economic outlook and cooling inflation, though the RBA maintained a cautious stance on the need for further easing.The move was widely anticipated by markets, given a slowdown in domestic inflation and heightened global uncertainty following recent US tariff announcements. Headline consumer price inflation held at 2.4 per cent in the first quarter of 2025, and a key trimmed mean measure of core inflation slowed to 2.9 per cent, bringing it back into the RBA’s 2 per cent to 3 per cent target band for the first time since late 2021.“Inflation is in the target band, and upside risks appear to have diminished as international developments are expected to weigh on the economy,” the RBA board stated.They assessed that this rate cut would make monetary policy “somewhat less restrictive”, but emphasised continued caution about the outlook, especially given the elevated uncertainty surrounding both aggregate demand and supply.&nbsp;Trade tensions cast a shadow&nbsp;A significant factor influencing the RBA’s decision is the rapidly evolving global trade landscape. Since the RBA’s last meeting in April, US President Donald Trump’s tariffs have continued to roil financial markets and disrupt business plans.While a recent agreement between Washington and Beijing has temporarily slashed some duties for 90 days, considerable uncertainty remains about the final scope of tariffs and the policy responses of other nations.Australia, a major exporter of resources to China, is particularly vulnerable to disruptions in global trade. Tariffs on the world’s second-biggest economy could hinder its growth and, consequently, its demand for commodities like iron ore.The RBA’s quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy indicated that inflation would be lower and unemployment higher due to the cascading effects of global trade tensions. It specifically warned that the drag from Trump’s tariffs would lower global growth and prove disinflationary for Australia in net terms.&nbsp;Mixed domestic picture&nbsp;Domestically, the data flow has been mixed. While the anticipated rebound in consumer spending has been disappointingly low, the labour market has remained strong, with the jobless rate hovering around a low 4.1 per cent for over a year. Wage growth picked up in the first quarter, though this was primarily attributed to government pay rises rather than a damaging wage-price spiral.Despite the rate cut, the RBA remains attentive to domestic economic activity and inflation uncertainties. The RBA’s staff forecasts now project underlying inflation to ease slightly more quickly to be around the mid-point of its 2-3 per cent target range throughout much of the forecast period, while the labour market is seen loosening a tad. These forecasts assume a cumulative 85 basis points of easing by mid-2026.The RBA has adopted a delicate balance in its monetary policy, seeking to hold onto labour market gains while curbing inflation. With core inflation returning to target and unemployment remaining low, this approach appears to be yielding results.However, the Board acknowledged the uncertainties, including the lags in the effect of monetary policy and how firms’ pricing decisions and wages will respond to the demand environment and weak productivity outcomes amidst a tight labour market. The RBA concluded that while the risks to inflation have become more balanced, it will remain data-dependent and vigilant in guiding its future decisions, focusing on its mandate to deliver price stability and full employment.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

RBA lowered its main cash rate by 25 basis points to a two-year low of 3.85 per cent, though it maintained a cautious stance on the need for further easing.

Australia’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), on May 20 lowered its main cash rate by 25 basis points to a two-year low of 3.85 per cent. The decision, which marks the second rate cut this year, was driven by the uncertainty in the global economic outlook and cooling inflation, though the RBA maintained a cautious stance on the need for further easing. The move was widely anticipated by markets, given a slowdown in domestic inflation and heightened global uncertainty following recent US tariff announcements. Headline consumer price inflation held at 2.4 per cent in the first quarter of 2025, and a key trimmed mean measure of core inflation slowed to 2.9 per cent, bringing it back into the RBA’s 2 per cent to 3 per cent target band for the first time since late 2021. “Inflation is in the target band, and upside risks appear to have diminished as international developments are expected to weigh on the economy,” the RBA board stated. They assessed that this rate cut would make monetary policy “somewhat less restrictive”, but emphasised continued caution about the outlook, especially given the elevated uncertainty surrounding both aggregate demand and supply. Trade tensions cast a shadow A significant factor influencing the RBA’s decision is the rapidly evolving global trade landscape. Since the RBA’s last meeting in April, US President Donald Trump’s tariffs have continued to roil financial markets and disrupt business plans. While a recent agreement between Washington and Beijing has temporarily slashed some duties for 90 days, considerable uncertainty remains about the final scope of tariffs and the policy responses of other nations. Australia, a major exporter of resources to China, is particularly vulnerable to disruptions in global trade. Tariffs on the world’s second-biggest economy could hinder its growth and, consequently, its demand for commodities like iron ore. The RBA’s quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy indicated that inflation would be lower and unemployment higher due to the cascading effects of global trade tensions. It specifically warned that the drag from Trump’s tariffs would lower global growth and prove disinflationary for Australia in net terms. Mixed domestic picture Domestically, the data flow has been mixed. While the anticipated rebound in consumer spending has been disappointingly low, the labour market has remained strong, with the jobless rate hovering around a low 4.1 per cent for over a year. Wage growth picked up in the first quarter, though this was primarily attributed to government pay rises rather than a damaging wage-price spiral. Despite the rate cut, the RBA remains attentive to domestic economic activity and inflation uncertainties. The RBA’s staff forecasts now project underlying inflation to ease slightly more quickly to be around the mid-point of its 2-3 per cent target range throughout much of the forecast period, while the labour market is seen loosening a tad. These forecasts assume a cumulative 85 basis points of easing by mid-2026. The RBA has adopted a delicate balance in its monetary policy, seeking to hold onto labour market gains while curbing inflation. With core inflation returning to target and unemployment remaining low, this approach appears to be yielding results. However, the Board acknowledged the uncertainties, including the lags in the effect of monetary policy and how firms’ pricing decisions and wages will respond to the demand environment and weak productivity outcomes amidst a tight labour market. The RBA concluded that while the risks to inflation have become more balanced, it will remain data-dependent and vigilant in guiding its future decisions, focusing on its mandate to deliver price stability and full employment. (With inputs from agencies)

RBA lowered its main cash rate by 25 basis points to a two-year low of 3.85 per cent, though it maintained a cautious stance on the need for further easing.

Australian central bank cuts rate to two-year low amid global headwinds

China’s battery behemoth CATL just pulled off the biggest IPO of the year, but the buzz around its $4.6 billion Hong Kong debut wasn’t just about market performance, it was about who wasn’t&nbsp;allowed to invest. &nbsp;In a striking sign of deepening US-China financial tensions, onshore American investors were reportedly barred from buying shares of CATL, the world’s largest EV battery maker and a key supplier to Tesla, Volkswagen, and Toyota.&nbsp;&nbsp;The move underscored a growing “financial decoupling” between the world’s two largest economies. Economist Stephen Roach, former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, told The New York Times that “we are headed toward full financial decoupling with China” and added that “Congress is driving the process of disengagement.”&nbsp;Why is CATL’s IPO a big deal?&nbsp;Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL) dominates the global electric vehicle battery market, controlling more than one-third of global EV battery sales, according to the BBC. The company is a cornerstone of China’s green tech ambitions and is rapidly expanding overseas, with manufacturing plants in Germany and Hungary, and an upcoming factory in Spain in partnership with Stellantis. &nbsp;Although already listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, CATL raised HK$35.7 billion ($4.55 billion) in its Hong Kong debut — the largest public offering of 2025 so far, according to data provider Dealogic, as reported by The New York Times.&nbsp;&nbsp;Neil Beveridge, head of Asia research at Bernstein, told the BBC that “the performance of the stock was very good in what is going to be a key IPO for Hong Kong given the size of the listing.”&nbsp;Why were US investors barred? &nbsp;The exclusion of onshore US investors from CATL’s Hong Kong listing was a direct result of escalating geopolitical tensions. In January, the US Department of Defense designated CATL as a company allegedly working with China’s military, a move that was reported by both the BBC and The New York Times.&nbsp;&nbsp;Then in April, the chair of the House Select Committee on China wrote to the CEOs of JPMorgan and Bank of America, urging them to withdraw from the IPO, according to the BBC. In addition, The New York Times reported that US lawmakers lobbied Wall Street banks to distance themselves from the deal, citing national security concerns.&nbsp;Facing mounting scrutiny, CATL restructured its IPO as a Regulation S offering, effectively barring onshore US investors and avoiding certain regulatory filings in the United States. In regulatory documents, the company admitted that it faces “risks associated with changes in trade policies or tariff regulations,” as reported by The New York Times.&nbsp;&nbsp;CATL also strongly denied any ties to military operations, stating it “has never engaged in any military-related businesses or activities” and had reached out to the Department of Defense to challenge what it called a false designation.&nbsp;The bigger picture: Financial decoupling CATL’s listing marks a dramatic reversal from the earlier trend of Chinese tech firms pursuing Wall Street debuts. When Alibaba went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2014, it raised $21.8 billion and was celebrated by American investors and bankers.&nbsp;&nbsp;But according to The New York Times, the current climate is very different, with Chinese companies increasingly steering clear of US markets due to both political pressures and policy constraints.&nbsp;Experts believe this may just be the beginning. Victor Shih, a specialist in Chinese finance at the University of California, San Diego, told The New York Times that CATL’s IPO structure represents “a major milestone” and predicted that “this will apply to many Chinese hardware and even some software producers,” effectively shutting out American investors from future high-growth opportunities. He estimated that around 10 per cent of US investors might have participated in the CATL IPO had they not been restricted.&nbsp;Can tariffs hurt CATL?&nbsp;Not as much as one might expect. CATL generates nearly 70 per cent of its revenue from the Chinese market, which has helped buffer the company against the effects of US-imposed tariffs, according to the BBC.&nbsp;&nbsp;Despite trade headwinds, CATL continues to be a global innovation leader. In April, it unveiled a new battery capable of fast-charging up to 323 miles (520 kilometers) in just five minutes, as reported by the BBC.&nbsp;&nbsp;The company also provides lithium iron phosphate batteries to Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory, further cementing its global presence.

CATL $4.6 billion Hong Kong debut wasn’t just about market performance, it was about who wasn’t allowed to invest.

China’s battery behemoth CATL just pulled off the biggest IPO of the year, but the buzz around its $4.6 billion Hong Kong debut wasn’t just about market performance, it was about who wasn’t allowed to invest. In a striking sign of deepening US-China financial tensions, onshore American investors were reportedly barred from buying shares of CATL, the world’s largest EV battery maker and a key supplier to Tesla, Volkswagen, and Toyota. The move underscored a growing “financial decoupling” between the world’s two largest economies. Economist Stephen Roach, former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, told The New York Times that “we are headed toward full financial decoupling with China” and added that “Congress is driving the process of disengagement.” Why is CATL’s IPO a big deal? Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL) dominates the global electric vehicle battery market, controlling more than one-third of global EV battery sales, according to the BBC. The company is a cornerstone of China’s green tech ambitions and is rapidly expanding overseas, with manufacturing plants in Germany and Hungary, and an upcoming factory in Spain in partnership with Stellantis. Although already listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, CATL raised HK$35.7 billion ($4.55 billion) in its Hong Kong debut — the largest public offering of 2025 so far, according to data provider Dealogic, as reported by The New York Times. Neil Beveridge, head of Asia research at Bernstein, told the BBC that “the performance of the stock was very good in what is going to be a key IPO for Hong Kong given the size of the listing.” Why were US investors barred? The exclusion of onshore US investors from CATL’s Hong Kong listing was a direct result of escalating geopolitical tensions. In January, the US Department of Defense designated CATL as a company allegedly working with China’s military, a move that was reported by both the BBC and The New York Times. Then in April, the chair of the House Select Committee on China wrote to the CEOs of JPMorgan and Bank of America, urging them to withdraw from the IPO, according to the BBC. In addition, The New York Times reported that US lawmakers lobbied Wall Street banks to distance themselves from the deal, citing national security concerns. Facing mounting scrutiny, CATL restructured its IPO as a Regulation S offering, effectively barring onshore US investors and avoiding certain regulatory filings in the United States. In regulatory documents, the company admitted that it faces “risks associated with changes in trade policies or tariff regulations,” as reported by The New York Times. CATL also strongly denied any ties to military operations, stating it “has never engaged in any military-related businesses or activities” and had reached out to the Department of Defense to challenge what it called a false designation. The bigger picture: Financial decoupling CATL’s listing marks a dramatic reversal from the earlier trend of Chinese tech firms pursuing Wall Street debuts. When Alibaba went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2014, it raised $21.8 billion and was celebrated by American investors and bankers. But according to The New York Times, the current climate is very different, with Chinese companies increasingly steering clear of US markets due to both political pressures and policy constraints. Experts believe this may just be the beginning. Victor Shih, a specialist in Chinese finance at the University of California, San Diego, told The New York Times that CATL’s IPO structure represents “a major milestone” and predicted that “this will apply to many Chinese hardware and even some software producers,” effectively shutting out American investors from future high-growth opportunities. He estimated that around 10 per cent of US investors might have participated in the CATL IPO had they not been restricted. Can tariffs hurt CATL? Not as much as one might expect. CATL generates nearly 70 per cent of its revenue from the Chinese market, which has helped buffer the company against the effects of US-imposed tariffs, according to the BBC. Despite trade headwinds, CATL continues to be a global innovation leader. In April, it unveiled a new battery capable of fast-charging up to 323 miles (520 kilometers) in just five minutes, as reported by the BBC. The company also provides lithium iron phosphate batteries to Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory, further cementing its global presence.

Amid global trade tension, China’s battery behemoth Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL) just pulled off the biggest IPO of the year.

How the US-China trade war shaped CATL’s blockbuster Hong Kong debut

Foxconn, the key assembler of Apple’s iPhones, has pledged a significant investment of $1.5 billion into its Indian operations, signalling an ongoing shift in Apple’s global supply chain strategy.The move reflects the company’s efforts to ramp up production outside of China, as it looks to mitigate risks posed by ongoing trade tensions, tariffs, and geopolitical uncertainty. This latest funding, made via Foxconn’s Singapore-based subsidiary, comes as the company expands its manufacturing capacity in southern India, positioning the country as a crucial hub for Apple’s iPhone production.&nbsp;iPhone production diversification&nbsp;Foxconn’s investment is the latest step in Apple’s broader push to diversify its manufacturing, which has been concentrated in China for years. As global political tensions, particularly the US-China trade war, have escalated, Apple has sought to reduce its heavy reliance on Chinese factories and shift more production to other countries.India has emerged as a critical destination for this production shift, with Foxconn’s factories in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Telangana now playing a central role in assembling iPhones for both domestic and export markets.In the 12 months leading up to March 2025, Apple’s production of iPhones in India surged to $22 billion, a nearly 60 per cent increase compared to the previous year. A significant portion of this production is handled by Foxconn’s factory in India, which is rapidly expanding.Tata Group, which recently acquired Wistron’s Indian operations and took over Pegatron’s local business, has also played a key role in Apple’s manufacturing strategy in India. These efforts align with Apple’s broader goal to produce a substantial portion of the iPhones sold in the United States from India by the end of next year.Minister for Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw recently celebrated a major milestone in India’s role in Apple’s supply chain. He announced that Apple had exported iPhones worth over $17.4 billion during the fiscal year ending in March 2025, underscoring the significant growth in India’s smartphone manufacturing sector. This is a part of a larger trend in India’s growing role in global electronics manufacturing, as total smartphone exports from the country crossed $23.4 billion, a 54 per cent increase over the previous year.&nbsp;A strategic shift&nbsp;Apple’s push to move a significant portion of its production out of China was driven by several factors, including disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, which exposed the risks of over-reliance on a single manufacturing location. Apple’s factories in China faced severe production delays during the pandemic, highlighting the vulnerability of having a large portion of its supply chain concentrated in one country.This disruption prompted Apple to accelerate its efforts to diversify its supply chain, turning to India, Southeast Asia, and other regions as alternative manufacturing hubs.However, despite this pivot, Apple is unlikely to fully exit China in the near future. Experts believe that while India and Southeast Asia will become increasingly central to Apple’s production strategy, China will remain a key player in the firm's supply chain due to its well-established infrastructure and workforce.The geopolitical climate, particularly the tense relationship between the US and China, has further driven Apple’s efforts to reduce its exposure to potential tariffs. Apple and other global companies are diversifying their production locations to mitigate the risks associated with unpredictable trade policies. As part of this strategy, Apple has also increased its investments in the US.The company has pledged to invest $500 billion domestically over the next four years and create more American jobs, although Apple currently does not produce smartphones in the US.Despite these investments, US President Donald Trump has criticised Apple’s growing manufacturing footprint in India. Trump has publicly urged Apple CEO Tim Cook to stop building factories in India and instead focus on increasing US-based production.Trump’s comments reflect broader concerns about the outsourcing of American manufacturing jobs and the potential impact of such shifts on the US economy. However, Apple has maintained that its strategy to diversify production is necessary to safeguard its long-term growth and ensure its supply chain is resilient to geopolitical and economic disruptions.&nbsp;Local economic impact&nbsp;Foxconn’s $1.5 billion investment in India is a significant vote of confidence in the country’s manufacturing capabilities and its growing role in global supply chains. Karnataka’s Minister M. B. Patil recently announced in a post on X that Foxconn’s Devanahalli ITIR (Information Technology Investment Region) near Bengaluru is on track to begin exporting iPhones to the US as early as June. This development marks a major milestone for Karnataka, positioning it as a key player in the global electronics manufacturing sector.Patil highlighted the positive impact of this investment on the local economy, noting that the expansion of Foxconn’s operations in the state is not only strengthening its position on the international production map but also driving foreign investment and creating jobs.(With inputs from agencies)

The move reflects the company’s efforts to ramp up production outside of China, as it looks to mitigate risks posed by ongoing trade tensions, tariffs, and geopolitical uncertainty.

Foxconn, the key assembler of Apple’s iPhones, has pledged a significant investment of $1.5 billion into its Indian operations, signalling an ongoing shift in Apple’s global supply chain strategy. The move reflects the company’s efforts to ramp up production outside of China, as it looks to mitigate risks posed by ongoing trade tensions, tariffs, and geopolitical uncertainty. This latest funding, made via Foxconn’s Singapore-based subsidiary, comes as the company expands its manufacturing capacity in southern India, positioning the country as a crucial hub for Apple’s iPhone production. iPhone production diversification Foxconn’s investment is the latest step in Apple’s broader push to diversify its manufacturing, which has been concentrated in China for years. As global political tensions, particularly the US-China trade war, have escalated, Apple has sought to reduce its heavy reliance on Chinese factories and shift more production to other countries. India has emerged as a critical destination for this production shift, with Foxconn’s factories in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Telangana now playing a central role in assembling iPhones for both domestic and export markets. In the 12 months leading up to March 2025, Apple’s production of iPhones in India surged to $22 billion, a nearly 60 per cent increase compared to the previous year. A significant portion of this production is handled by Foxconn’s factory in India, which is rapidly expanding. Tata Group, which recently acquired Wistron’s Indian operations and took over Pegatron’s local business, has also played a key role in Apple’s manufacturing strategy in India. These efforts align with Apple’s broader goal to produce a substantial portion of the iPhones sold in the United States from India by the end of next year. Minister for Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw recently celebrated a major milestone in India’s role in Apple’s supply chain. He announced that Apple had exported iPhones worth over $17.4 billion during the fiscal year ending in March 2025, underscoring the significant growth in India’s smartphone manufacturing sector. This is a part of a larger trend in India’s growing role in global electronics manufacturing, as total smartphone exports from the country crossed $23.4 billion, a 54 per cent increase over the previous year. A strategic shift Apple’s push to move a significant portion of its production out of China was driven by several factors, including disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, which exposed the risks of over-reliance on a single manufacturing location. Apple’s factories in China faced severe production delays during the pandemic, highlighting the vulnerability of having a large portion of its supply chain concentrated in one country. This disruption prompted Apple to accelerate its efforts to diversify its supply chain, turning to India, Southeast Asia, and other regions as alternative manufacturing hubs. However, despite this pivot, Apple is unlikely to fully exit China in the near future. Experts believe that while India and Southeast Asia will become increasingly central to Apple’s production strategy, China will remain a key player in the firm's supply chain due to its well-established infrastructure and workforce. The geopolitical climate, particularly the tense relationship between the US and China, has further driven Apple’s efforts to reduce its exposure to potential tariffs. Apple and other global companies are diversifying their production locations to mitigate the risks associated with unpredictable trade policies. As part of this strategy, Apple has also increased its investments in the US. The company has pledged to invest $500 billion domestically over the next four years and create more American jobs, although Apple currently does not produce smartphones in the US. Despite these investments, US President Donald Trump has criticised Apple’s growing manufacturing footprint in India. Trump has publicly urged Apple CEO Tim Cook to stop building factories in India and instead focus on increasing US-based production. Trump’s comments reflect broader concerns about the outsourcing of American manufacturing jobs and the potential impact of such shifts on the US economy. However, Apple has maintained that its strategy to diversify production is necessary to safeguard its long-term growth and ensure its supply chain is resilient to geopolitical and economic disruptions. Local economic impact Foxconn’s $1.5 billion investment in India is a significant vote of confidence in the country’s manufacturing capabilities and its growing role in global supply chains. Karnataka’s Minister M. B. Patil recently announced in a post on X that Foxconn’s Devanahalli ITIR (Information Technology Investment Region) near Bengaluru is on track to begin exporting iPhones to the US as early as June. This development marks a major milestone for Karnataka, positioning it as a key player in the global electronics manufacturing sector. Patil highlighted the positive impact of this investment on the local economy, noting that the expansion of Foxconn’s operations in the state is not only strengthening its position on the international production map but also driving foreign investment and creating jobs. (With inputs from agencies)

The move reflects the company’s efforts to ramp up production outside of China, as it looks to mitigate risks posed by ongoing trade tensions, tariffs, and geopolitical uncertainty.

Foxconn commits $1.5 billion to expand iPhone production in India

India's markets regulator has warned two Mauritius-based funds with ties to Adani group. According to documents reviewed by Reuters, the funds in question could face penalties and cancellation of licences for not sharing shareholder details despite multiple requests.The Adani group and its offshore investors have been under the regulatory radar since a report in 2023 alleged improper use of tax havens and other malpractices. The group has repeatedly denied any wrongdoings.&nbsp;What does SEBI say?&nbsp;Indian regulations require at least 25 per cent of the shares be held by public shareholders. This was put to test as the Group was accused of breaching these rules with its offshore funds.The two Mauritius-based funds were asked to provide 'granular disclosures' of all their shareholders since they had 'concentrated positions' in the Adani Group. This is based on a document reviewed by Reuters dated March 28.'To date, this has not been provided by these FPIs (Foreign portfolio investors) to SEBI...they have also not provided any reasons,' Reuters said quoting the document.The two funds have reportedly applied to SEBI, requesting a monetary fine instead of disclosing documents. This is according to Reuters. At least two other offshore investors in Adani stocks are yet to supply information on Adani holdings.The US authorities had earlier indicted group chairman Gautam Adani and some other executives, alleging they paid bribes to secure Indian contracts and misled investors. Adani denied any wrongdoing, saying the allegations are baseless. later, the act based on which the case was filed, was dismissed when Trump came to power.Adani group is yet to respond to WION’s request for comments on this.

Two Mauritius-based funds were asked to provide 'granular disclosures' of all their shareholders since they had 'concentrated positions' in the Adani Group.

India's markets regulator has warned two Mauritius-based funds with ties to Adani group. According to documents reviewed by Reuters, the funds in question could face penalties and cancellation of licences for not sharing shareholder details despite multiple requests. The Adani group and its offshore investors have been under the regulatory radar since a report in 2023 alleged improper use of tax havens and other malpractices. The group has repeatedly denied any wrongdoings. What does SEBI say? Indian regulations require at least 25 per cent of the shares be held by public shareholders. This was put to test as the Group was accused of breaching these rules with its offshore funds. The two Mauritius-based funds were asked to provide 'granular disclosures' of all their shareholders since they had 'concentrated positions' in the Adani Group. This is based on a document reviewed by Reuters dated March 28. 'To date, this has not been provided by these FPIs (Foreign portfolio investors) to SEBI...they have also not provided any reasons,' Reuters said quoting the document. The two funds have reportedly applied to SEBI, requesting a monetary fine instead of disclosing documents. This is according to Reuters. At least two other offshore investors in Adani stocks are yet to supply information on Adani holdings. The US authorities had earlier indicted group chairman Gautam Adani and some other executives, alleging they paid bribes to secure Indian contracts and misled investors. Adani denied any wrongdoing, saying the allegations are baseless. later, the act based on which the case was filed, was dismissed when Trump came to power. Adani group is yet to respond to WION’s request for comments on this.

Two Mauritius-based funds were asked to provide 'granular disclosures' of all their shareholders since they had 'concentrated positions' in the Adani Group.

SEBI warns 2 offshore funds holding Adani shares with penalties

China's central bank, the People's Bank of China (PBOC), lowered its key lending rates for the first time since October as part of a broader effort to stabilise the country’s economy amid ongoing trade tensions with the United States.&nbsp;On May 20, the PBOC cut the one-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 10 basis points to 3.0 per cent from 3.1 per cent and the five-year LPR by a similar margin to 3.5 per cent from 3.6 per cent. These cuts aim to stimulate consumption, encourage borrowing, and ultimately help offset economic challenges such as weak domestic demand and deflationary pressures.&nbsp;Economic impact&nbsp;The decision to reduce the LPR follows a series of monetary easing measures that the PBOC has been implementing in response to slowing economic growth. The LPR serves as a benchmark for the interest rates charged on loans, including mortgages, and influences both corporate and household borrowing. The one-year LPR, in particular, is vital for short-term loans, while the five-year rate directly impacts mortgage lending, making this decision significant for the housing market.&nbsp;The rate cuts were widely anticipated by analysts, with many forecasting a 10-basis-point reduction. This move comes after a period of escalating trade tensions between the US and China, which had put substantial strain on both economies.&nbsp;However, the recent easing of tensions, following a temporary tariff reduction agreement between the two countries, has provided some breathing room for China to implement its monetary policy. The US and China agreed to roll back tariffs for 90 days, which has raised hopes of a more lasting resolution to the trade war.&nbsp;While the rate cuts are seen as a step in the right direction, economists warn that modest interest rate reductions alone may not be enough to generate substantial economic growth.&nbsp;Strategic policy adjustments&nbsp;In addition to the rate cuts, Chinese authorities have also implemented measures to ease liquidity conditions by lowering the reserve requirement ratio for banks. This move aims to free up more funds for lending and investment, further supporting economic activity.&nbsp;These steps come in the wake of weakening economic indicators, including a sharp decline in new loans, which plummeted by 61 per cent year-over-year in April, signalling diminished confidence in borrowing due to tariff concerns.&nbsp;Morgan Stanley economists told CNBC that stimulus measures are likely to be "lighter and delayed" due to the reduced likelihood of further escalations in the trade war. However, the firm also cautioned that despite the tariff reduction, the US trade-weighted tariff rate on China remains high, which could continue to dampen external demand for Chinese exports and exacerbate domestic overcapacity issues.&nbsp;The decision to cut rates comes as part of a broader economic strategy that includes both monetary and fiscal easing, aimed at navigating the challenges posed by deflation and sluggish domestic consumption. Wholesale prices in China fell sharply in April, marking the steepest drop in six months, and consumer prices have been in decline for three consecutive months, underscoring persistent deflationary pressure.&nbsp;Despite the favourable impact of the trade de-escalation on the yuan, which has strengthened by over 2.8 per cent against the US dollar since reaching a record low last month, the overall economic outlook remains uncertain.&nbsp;As China pushes forward with its stimulus measures, the government's goal of achieving a growth target of around 5 per cent for the year seems increasingly dependent on the success of these policies.&nbsp;The combination of lower interest rates, fiscal stimulus, and trade negotiations presents a delicate balancing act for Beijing, which must navigate deflation, sluggish demand, and trade risks to achieve its growth objectives for 2025. &nbsp;

These cuts aim to stimulate consumption, encourage borrowing, and ultimately help offset economic challenges such as weak domestic demand and deflationary pressures.

China's central bank, the People's Bank of China (PBOC), lowered its key lending rates for the first time since October as part of a broader effort to stabilise the country’s economy amid ongoing trade tensions with the United States. On May 20, the PBOC cut the one-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 10 basis points to 3.0 per cent from 3.1 per cent and the five-year LPR by a similar margin to 3.5 per cent from 3.6 per cent. These cuts aim to stimulate consumption, encourage borrowing, and ultimately help offset economic challenges such as weak domestic demand and deflationary pressures. Economic impact The decision to reduce the LPR follows a series of monetary easing measures that the PBOC has been implementing in response to slowing economic growth. The LPR serves as a benchmark for the interest rates charged on loans, including mortgages, and influences both corporate and household borrowing. The one-year LPR, in particular, is vital for short-term loans, while the five-year rate directly impacts mortgage lending, making this decision significant for the housing market. The rate cuts were widely anticipated by analysts, with many forecasting a 10-basis-point reduction. This move comes after a period of escalating trade tensions between the US and China, which had put substantial strain on both economies. However, the recent easing of tensions, following a temporary tariff reduction agreement between the two countries, has provided some breathing room for China to implement its monetary policy. The US and China agreed to roll back tariffs for 90 days, which has raised hopes of a more lasting resolution to the trade war. While the rate cuts are seen as a step in the right direction, economists warn that modest interest rate reductions alone may not be enough to generate substantial economic growth. Strategic policy adjustments In addition to the rate cuts, Chinese authorities have also implemented measures to ease liquidity conditions by lowering the reserve requirement ratio for banks. This move aims to free up more funds for lending and investment, further supporting economic activity. These steps come in the wake of weakening economic indicators, including a sharp decline in new loans, which plummeted by 61 per cent year-over-year in April, signalling diminished confidence in borrowing due to tariff concerns. Morgan Stanley economists told CNBC that stimulus measures are likely to be "lighter and delayed" due to the reduced likelihood of further escalations in the trade war. However, the firm also cautioned that despite the tariff reduction, the US trade-weighted tariff rate on China remains high, which could continue to dampen external demand for Chinese exports and exacerbate domestic overcapacity issues. The decision to cut rates comes as part of a broader economic strategy that includes both monetary and fiscal easing, aimed at navigating the challenges posed by deflation and sluggish domestic consumption. Wholesale prices in China fell sharply in April, marking the steepest drop in six months, and consumer prices have been in decline for three consecutive months, underscoring persistent deflationary pressure. Despite the favourable impact of the trade de-escalation on the yuan, which has strengthened by over 2.8 per cent against the US dollar since reaching a record low last month, the overall economic outlook remains uncertain. As China pushes forward with its stimulus measures, the government's goal of achieving a growth target of around 5 per cent for the year seems increasingly dependent on the success of these policies. The combination of lower interest rates, fiscal stimulus, and trade negotiations presents a delicate balancing act for Beijing, which must navigate deflation, sluggish demand, and trade risks to achieve its growth objectives for 2025.

On May 20, the Central bank of China cut the one-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 10 basis points to 3.0 per cent from 3.1 per cent and the five-year LPR by a similar margin to 3.5 per cent from 3.6 per cent.&nbsp;

China cuts key lending rates to boost economic recovery amid trade war concerns

Five years after the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union, both parties have signed a comprehensive agreement aimed at revitalising their relationship. This deal addresses key sectors such as trade, defence, energy, and fisheries, marking a significant step in UK-EU relations.&nbsp;&nbsp;The agreement comes at a time when global trade dynamics are shifting, notably with the United States imposing new tariffs under President Donald Trump’s administration.&nbsp;Key components of the 'reset' deal&nbsp;1. Trade and food exports &nbsp;A central element of the agreement is the easing of trade frictions, particularly concerning food and agricultural products. The UK and EU have agreed on a veterinary deal that reduces red tape and checks on animal and plant products.&nbsp; &nbsp;This move is expected to benefit UK food exporters, who have faced significant challenges since Brexit. According to the BBC, UK food exports to the EU have fallen by 34 per cent compared to 2019, largely due to increased paperwork and regulatory barriers. The new agreement aims to reverse this trend by simplifying export procedures.&nbsp;2. Fisheries access In a notable concession, the UK has granted EU fishing vessels continued access to British waters for an additional 12 years, extending the existing arrangements until 2038. This extension is part of the broader trade-off to facilitate smoother trade relations and reduce barriers for UK exporters.&nbsp;&nbsp;While this move has been welcomed by EU member states, it has drawn criticism from UK fishing communities who view it as a compromise on national sovereignty. The BBC reports that the fishing rights extension was a key component in reaching the overall agreement.&nbsp;3. Defence and security cooperation The agreement also encompasses enhanced cooperation in defence and security. Both parties have committed to regular strategic dialogues and joint initiatives to address shared security challenges.&nbsp; This renewed collaboration signifies a mutual recognition of the importance of collective security in an increasingly complex global landscape.&nbsp;4. Energy collaboration Energy cooperation forms another pillar of the deal. The UK and EU have agreed to work closely on energy matters, including the integration of energy markets and joint efforts to achieve climate goals.&nbsp; This collaboration is expected to lead to more efficient energy distribution and support the transition to renewable energy sources.&nbsp;Economic implications The UK government projects that the agreement could yield economic benefits of up to £9 billion annually by 2040, with a modest boost of 0.3 per cent to the UK’s GDP. However, analysts caution that while the deal represents progress, it only partially mitigates the economic impact of Brexit. The Financial Times notes that the agreement recoups only a fraction of the economic losses incurred since the UK’s departure from the EU.&nbsp;Political reactions Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has hailed the deal as a pragmatic step forward, emphasising the need to move beyond past political disputes. “It’s time to look forward,” he stated at the summit, highlighting the importance of practical solutions to improve the lives of British citizens.&nbsp; European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen echoed this sentiment, describing the summit as a “historic moment” and a “new chapter” in UK-EU relations.&nbsp; However, the agreement has faced criticism from some UK political figures. Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch labelled the deal a “surrender,” expressing concerns over concessions made, particularly in the fisheries sector. The UK-EU reset deal marks a significant development in post-Brexit relations, addressing critical sectors and aiming to foster a more collaborative partnership.&nbsp;&nbsp;While the agreement does not resolve all outstanding issues, it represents a concerted effort to rebuild trust and cooperation between the UK and the EU in an evolving global context. &nbsp;

Business & Economy: This deal addresses key sectors such as trade, defence, energy, and fisheries, marking a significant step in UK-EU relations. 

Five years after the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union, both parties have signed a comprehensive agreement aimed at revitalising their relationship. This deal addresses key sectors such as trade, defence, energy, and fisheries, marking a significant step in UK-EU relations. The agreement comes at a time when global trade dynamics are shifting, notably with the United States imposing new tariffs under President Donald Trump’s administration. Key components of the 'reset' deal 1. Trade and food exports A central element of the agreement is the easing of trade frictions, particularly concerning food and agricultural products. The UK and EU have agreed on a veterinary deal that reduces red tape and checks on animal and plant products. This move is expected to benefit UK food exporters, who have faced significant challenges since Brexit. According to the BBC, UK food exports to the EU have fallen by 34 per cent compared to 2019, largely due to increased paperwork and regulatory barriers. The new agreement aims to reverse this trend by simplifying export procedures. 2. Fisheries access In a notable concession, the UK has granted EU fishing vessels continued access to British waters for an additional 12 years, extending the existing arrangements until 2038. This extension is part of the broader trade-off to facilitate smoother trade relations and reduce barriers for UK exporters. While this move has been welcomed by EU member states, it has drawn criticism from UK fishing communities who view it as a compromise on national sovereignty. The BBC reports that the fishing rights extension was a key component in reaching the overall agreement. 3. Defence and security cooperation The agreement also encompasses enhanced cooperation in defence and security. Both parties have committed to regular strategic dialogues and joint initiatives to address shared security challenges. This renewed collaboration signifies a mutual recognition of the importance of collective security in an increasingly complex global landscape. 4. Energy collaboration Energy cooperation forms another pillar of the deal. The UK and EU have agreed to work closely on energy matters, including the integration of energy markets and joint efforts to achieve climate goals. This collaboration is expected to lead to more efficient energy distribution and support the transition to renewable energy sources. Economic implications The UK government projects that the agreement could yield economic benefits of up to £9 billion annually by 2040, with a modest boost of 0.3 per cent to the UK’s GDP. However, analysts caution that while the deal represents progress, it only partially mitigates the economic impact of Brexit. The Financial Times notes that the agreement recoups only a fraction of the economic losses incurred since the UK’s departure from the EU. Political reactions Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has hailed the deal as a pragmatic step forward, emphasising the need to move beyond past political disputes. “It’s time to look forward,” he stated at the summit, highlighting the importance of practical solutions to improve the lives of British citizens. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen echoed this sentiment, describing the summit as a “historic moment” and a “new chapter” in UK-EU relations. However, the agreement has faced criticism from some UK political figures. Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch labelled the deal a “surrender,” expressing concerns over concessions made, particularly in the fisheries sector. The UK-EU reset deal marks a significant development in post-Brexit relations, addressing critical sectors and aiming to foster a more collaborative partnership. While the agreement does not resolve all outstanding issues, it represents a concerted effort to rebuild trust and cooperation between the UK and the EU in an evolving global context.

UK and US sign agreement to revitalise their relationship five years after Britain's EU exit. This comes amid shifting global trade dynamics and US tariffs under Donald Trump.

UK and EU forge landmark post-Brexit deal amid global trade tensions