Navratri 2026: 9 days, 9 forms of Goddess Durga and 9 colours- Check the complete list

Russian woman and Bihar boy's love story goes viral after she reaches India to marry him

Arijit Singh 9-city India stadium tour to start from January: Check venue and ticket prices

F1 set to return to Africa for first time since 1993 

'Don't ever mess with nature!': Trump’s tiger attack post triggers social media backlash as victim's family issues heartbreaking tribute

US judge blocks Trump administration sanctions on human rights groups supporting Gaza war crimes investigation

Washington calls for 'de-escalation' as Ethiopia-Eritrea tensions fuel war fears

Which jobs are safest from humanoid robots?

US midterms: Trump rallies behind Husted as Brown mounts challenge in crucial Ohio race

US police foil alleged mass shooting plot targeting Illinois Hindu temple during Navratri; 19-year-old’s manifesto called Indians ‘subhumans’

‘Rise up, young patriots!’: American singer Mary Millben says US donors funding CJP, backs Modi govt

Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay calls on US to 'get back to' being defender of human rights

Iran war: Will Trump, Netanyahu escalate conflict ahead of crucial elections? | Race to Power

Who is Abu Dhabi royal Mahrah Al Nahyan, found unconscious on London street with toddler after cocaine use

Iranian woman, 23, handed death sentence for ‘blasphemy’ in social media post; appeals for help

'Turn approver, resign, we'll forgive you': Rahul Gandhi claims receiving messages from CEC Gyanesh Kumar

'Leakers should be shot': Trump rages over leak of US military plans to attack Iran, slams media

Somaliland celebrates after Trump calls it 'a totally different country', raise hopes of US recognition

Bangladesh man killed after mob storms hospital, drags him away over blasphemy allegations

‘My president, I mean my husband’: Trump's new press secretary Katie Zacharia's first briefing goes off the rails in 14 minutes

Mars is not for man: Human heart is too weak to survive the trip, study shows

Sheikh Hasina warns of 'deep sense of insecurity' among Bangladesh's minorities in Durga Puja message

FBI refutes media report claiming Kash Patel is in Russia for talks, says he is in Virginia

'Ouch!!! That must hurt': Kangana Ranaut hails Kamal Haasan's sharp reply to Elon Musk over Starlink row

Girl 'dead' for 8 hours wakes up at her own funeral, dad insists she wasn't breathing

New OTT releases this week (October 12-18, 2026): Sacrifice, Koffee with Karan S9, Roadies Rebirth- 6 titles coming on Netflix, JioHotstar and more

Did the US withhold missile warnings? Ukraine questions Washington's 'bad weather' explanation after Russian strikes kill six, cut power to 600,000

US Singer Mary Millben alleges foreign funding for CJP, warns against anti-Modi forces: All you need to know

Global energy crisis hits Indian economy 

Hidden video recording device found on Australian Navy ship amid claims of secret filming

'White supremacist' terror plot against Illinois Hindu temple foiled by jammed gun: Who is Alexandros Paporakis?

Zelensky feels betrayed by Trump, urges Musk to restore Starlink in Ukraine; Musk responds

'Girls are uncomfortable': Salman Khan calls out paparazzi for bad angles, speaks on PR on Koffee With Karan

After flydubai co-pilot attack, Air France bans Pakistani, Muslim-majority crew on Israel flights

US midterms 2026: Trump under election watch? Democrats deploy 100 observers across nine states

<p>The United Kingdom is moving ahead with legislation to regulate the fast-growing Buy-Now, Pay-Later (BNPL) sector, targeting lenders like Klarna, Clearpay, PayPal, and Zilch.&nbsp;</p><p><br>According to Bloomberg, the Treasury will present the new rules to Parliament on Monday, aiming to align BNPL offerings with traditional credit products.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This legislative shift follows growing concerns over unchecked consumer debt and limited protections for borrowers, with the government now pushing for stronger oversight after years of consultation.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>What’s changing?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Under the proposed rules, affordability checks will become mandatory, requiring lenders to assess whether a customer can realistically afford a BNPL loan before approving it. Borrower rights will also be strengthened, giving consumers quicker access to refunds and the right to file complaints with the Financial Ombudsman Service—something previously unavailable under BNPL schemes.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The new framework also seeks to improve transparency and accountability, ending the era of interest-free loans that often carried hidden risks. “These new rules will protect shoppers from debt traps,” said Emma Reynolds, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, in a statement cited by Bloomberg.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Why now?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The BNPL model has surged in popularity, especially among younger consumers looking for flexible payment options. However, critics argue that the lack of regulation has encouraged impulsive borrowing and pushed many into cycles of unaffordable debt.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The government’s move signals a more cautious approach to consumer credit in an increasingly digital retail landscape.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>BNPL’s economic footprint in the UK</strong></p><p><br>The BNPL sector has grown into a major part of the UK’s consumer credit ecosystem. According to data from Statista and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the total value of BNPL transactions in the UK reached approximately 14 billion pounds in 2023.&nbsp;</p><p><br>A report by Fitch Ratings noted that BNPL usage now accounts for roughly 6 to 7 percent of all UK online retail sales. Meanwhile, as per the Financial Times, more than 10 million people in the UK have used BNPL services—a number that continues to rise amid ongoing cost-of-living pressures.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>What happens next?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The legislation will be formally introduced in Parliament and is expected to take effect next year. That timeline gives BNPL providers a window to implement necessary compliance measures and for consumers to better understand the terms and risks of these services.</p>

This legislative shift follows growing concerns over unchecked consumer debt and limited protections for borrowers, with the government now pushing for stronger oversight after years of consultation.

The United Kingdom is moving ahead with legislation to regulate the fast-growing Buy-Now, Pay-Later (BNPL) sector, targeting lenders like Klarna, Clearpay, PayPal, and Zilch. According to Bloomberg, the Treasury will present the new rules to Parliament on Monday, aiming to align BNPL offerings with traditional credit products. This legislative shift follows growing concerns over unchecked consumer debt and limited protections for borrowers, with the government now pushing for stronger oversight after years of consultation. What’s changing? Under the proposed rules, affordability checks will become mandatory, requiring lenders to assess whether a customer can realistically afford a BNPL loan before approving it. Borrower rights will also be strengthened, giving consumers quicker access to refunds and the right to file complaints with the Financial Ombudsman Service—something previously unavailable under BNPL schemes. The new framework also seeks to improve transparency and accountability, ending the era of interest-free loans that often carried hidden risks. “These new rules will protect shoppers from debt traps,” said Emma Reynolds, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, in a statement cited by Bloomberg. Why now? The BNPL model has surged in popularity, especially among younger consumers looking for flexible payment options. However, critics argue that the lack of regulation has encouraged impulsive borrowing and pushed many into cycles of unaffordable debt. The government’s move signals a more cautious approach to consumer credit in an increasingly digital retail landscape. BNPL’s economic footprint in the UK The BNPL sector has grown into a major part of the UK’s consumer credit ecosystem. According to data from Statista and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the total value of BNPL transactions in the UK reached approximately 14 billion pounds in 2023. A report by Fitch Ratings noted that BNPL usage now accounts for roughly 6 to 7 percent of all UK online retail sales. Meanwhile, as per the Financial Times, more than 10 million people in the UK have used BNPL services—a number that continues to rise amid ongoing cost-of-living pressures. What happens next? The legislation will be formally introduced in Parliament and is expected to take effect next year. That timeline gives BNPL providers a window to implement necessary compliance measures and for consumers to better understand the terms and risks of these services.

<p>According to Bloomberg, the UK is moving ahead with legislation to regulate the fast-growing Buy-Now, Pay-Later (BNPL) sector, aiming to align BNPL offerings with traditional credit products.</p>

UK cracks down on Buy-Now, Pay-Later firms: What shoppers need to know

<p>Pakistan’s path to economic recovery just got rockier. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its latest report, has laid out stricter conditions for any future lending to the crisis-hit nation — conditions that go beyond traditional fiscal metrics and delve into politically sensitive reforms. And if that wasn’t enough, rising tensions with India are casting a long shadow over Islamabad’s ability to stabilise its fragile economy.</p><p><br>According to <i>Bloomberg</i>, the IMF has demanded sweeping structural reforms as a prerequisite for unlocking more funding. These include securing parliamentary approval for the upcoming federal budget by June, implementing agricultural income tax across all provinces, and rolling out a phased withdrawal of industrial incentives by year-end.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Additionally, Pakistan must adjust electricity and gas tariffs in a timely manner, and legislate to restructure debt in the energy sector, aiming to reduce the financial burden on state-owned power firms.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The IMF’s insistence on reforms reflects deeper concerns. Pakistan narrowly averted default in 2023, but with more than $100 billion in external financing needed through 2029, the margin for error is razor-thin. Complicating matters are geopolitical risks, especially those stemming from Pakistan’s worsening relationship with its eastern neighbour.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>India-Pakistan tensions</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The latest escalation began with the terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir on April 22, which claimed 26 lives. India blamed Pakistan-backed militants for orchestrating the assault and retaliated swiftly with Operation Sindoor, targeting terror camps across the Line of Control. But this was only the beginning. What followed was an aggressive economic retaliation campaign — one that’s proving to be just as damaging as military action.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On May 2, India banned all imports from Pakistan, including those routed via third countries like the UAE. While trade between the two has been minimal since 2019 — accounting for just 0.06 per cent of India’s overall trade — the move sends a strong political message. It also hits Pakistan where it hurts.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Islamabad relies heavily on Indian raw materials, especially in the pharmaceutical sector, where more than 90 per cent of ingredients are imported. With supply chains severed, Pakistan’s medicine, chemical, and processed food industries are already feeling the squeeze.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>India’s response extended beyond trade. It closed its airspace to Pakistani carriers, forcing Pakistan International Airlines to reroute flights through longer, costlier paths via Iran and Central Asia. International carriers like Lufthansa and British Airways have also suspended flights over Pakistan due to security risks, cutting into the country’s overflight revenue estimated between $30–50 million annually.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Maritime trade hasn’t been spared either. With ports closed to Pakistani-flagged vessels, exporters are forced to rely on more expensive third-party routes. This not only delays shipments but also jeopardizes Pakistan’s export earnings from textiles, rice, and sports goods, worsening its current account deficit.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>And perhaps the most severe blow came when India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty — a World Bank-brokered agreement that has governed river water sharing since 1960. Given that 90 per cent of Pakistan’s agriculture depends on these rivers, any interruption could cripple farming in provinces like Punjab and Sindh. Already, protests have erupted over water shortages and the threat of massive crop failures looms large.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>India hasn’t just flexed its economic muscle domestically — it has taken the fight global. New Delhi formally objected to the IMF’s recent $1 billion disbursement to Pakistan, arguing that the funds could be misused in ways that undermine regional security. Bloomberg reports that India lobbied the IMF and World Bank to reconsider aid and credit lines to Islamabad, especially in light of continued terror threats emanating from its soil.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The IMF responded cautiously, warning that persistent hostilities between the two nuclear-armed neighbours could derail reform efforts in Pakistan. It also cited reputational risks if the fund is perceived as turning a blind eye to geopolitical tensions or the potential misuse of disbursed funds.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Amid the brewing economic cold war, India and Pakistan’s economic trajectories are sharply diverging. According to the IMF, India’s GDP growth is expected to moderate from 8.2 per cent in 2023 to 7 per cent in 2024 and 6.5 per cent in 2025 — still robust by global standards. Pakistan, on the other hand, faces an uphill climb. The IMF has revised its 2025 growth forecast for Pakistan down to 3 per cent from 3.2 per cent, reflecting the economic strain from domestic instability, international isolation, and surging import costs.</p><p><br>&nbsp;</p><p><br>&nbsp;</p>

IMF's conditions go beyond traditional fiscal metrics and delve into politically sensitive reforms. This comes amid rising tensions with India are casting a long shadow over Islamabad’s ability to stabilise its fragile economy.

Pakistan’s path to economic recovery just got rockier. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its latest report, has laid out stricter conditions for any future lending to the crisis-hit nation — conditions that go beyond traditional fiscal metrics and delve into politically sensitive reforms. And if that wasn’t enough, rising tensions with India are casting a long shadow over Islamabad’s ability to stabilise its fragile economy. According to Bloomberg, the IMF has demanded sweeping structural reforms as a prerequisite for unlocking more funding. These include securing parliamentary approval for the upcoming federal budget by June, implementing agricultural income tax across all provinces, and rolling out a phased withdrawal of industrial incentives by year-end. Additionally, Pakistan must adjust electricity and gas tariffs in a timely manner, and legislate to restructure debt in the energy sector, aiming to reduce the financial burden on state-owned power firms. The IMF’s insistence on reforms reflects deeper concerns. Pakistan narrowly averted default in 2023, but with more than $100 billion in external financing needed through 2029, the margin for error is razor-thin. Complicating matters are geopolitical risks, especially those stemming from Pakistan’s worsening relationship with its eastern neighbour. India-Pakistan tensions The latest escalation began with the terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir on April 22, which claimed 26 lives. India blamed Pakistan-backed militants for orchestrating the assault and retaliated swiftly with Operation Sindoor, targeting terror camps across the Line of Control. But this was only the beginning. What followed was an aggressive economic retaliation campaign — one that’s proving to be just as damaging as military action. On May 2, India banned all imports from Pakistan, including those routed via third countries like the UAE. While trade between the two has been minimal since 2019 — accounting for just 0.06 per cent of India’s overall trade — the move sends a strong political message. It also hits Pakistan where it hurts. Islamabad relies heavily on Indian raw materials, especially in the pharmaceutical sector, where more than 90 per cent of ingredients are imported. With supply chains severed, Pakistan’s medicine, chemical, and processed food industries are already feeling the squeeze. India’s response extended beyond trade. It closed its airspace to Pakistani carriers, forcing Pakistan International Airlines to reroute flights through longer, costlier paths via Iran and Central Asia. International carriers like Lufthansa and British Airways have also suspended flights over Pakistan due to security risks, cutting into the country’s overflight revenue estimated between $30–50 million annually. Maritime trade hasn’t been spared either. With ports closed to Pakistani-flagged vessels, exporters are forced to rely on more expensive third-party routes. This not only delays shipments but also jeopardizes Pakistan’s export earnings from textiles, rice, and sports goods, worsening its current account deficit. And perhaps the most severe blow came when India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty — a World Bank-brokered agreement that has governed river water sharing since 1960. Given that 90 per cent of Pakistan’s agriculture depends on these rivers, any interruption could cripple farming in provinces like Punjab and Sindh. Already, protests have erupted over water shortages and the threat of massive crop failures looms large. India hasn’t just flexed its economic muscle domestically — it has taken the fight global. New Delhi formally objected to the IMF’s recent $1 billion disbursement to Pakistan, arguing that the funds could be misused in ways that undermine regional security. Bloomberg reports that India lobbied the IMF and World Bank to reconsider aid and credit lines to Islamabad, especially in light of continued terror threats emanating from its soil. The IMF responded cautiously, warning that persistent hostilities between the two nuclear-armed neighbours could derail reform efforts in Pakistan. It also cited reputational risks if the fund is perceived as turning a blind eye to geopolitical tensions or the potential misuse of disbursed funds. Amid the brewing economic cold war, India and Pakistan’s economic trajectories are sharply diverging. According to the IMF, India’s GDP growth is expected to moderate from 8.2 per cent in 2023 to 7 per cent in 2024 and 6.5 per cent in 2025 — still robust by global standards. Pakistan, on the other hand, faces an uphill climb. The IMF has revised its 2025 growth forecast for Pakistan down to 3 per cent from 3.2 per cent, reflecting the economic strain from domestic instability, international isolation, and surging import costs.

<p>The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has laid out stricter conditions for any future lending to the crisis-hit nation, Pakistan.&nbsp;</p>

IMF tightens conditions for Pakistan to get fresh loans amid mounting tensions with India

<p>India has officially launched biometric e-passports in select cities, marking a significant advancement in travel document security and efficiency. This initiative, part of the Passport Seva Programme 2.0, aims to enhance international travel safety and streamline immigration processes for Indian citizens.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>What Is an E-Passport?</strong></p><p>An e-passport is a traditional passport booklet embedded with a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip and antenna. This chip securely stores the holder’s personal and biometric information, including their photograph, fingerprints, passport number, and date of birth.&nbsp;</p><p>The data is encrypted and protected by international security standards such as Basic Access Control (BAC) and Extended Access Control (EAC), making it difficult to forge or tamper with.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Where Are E-Passports Being Issued?</strong></p><p>As of now, e-passports are being issued in the following 13 cities:&nbsp;</p><p>• Nagpur</p><p>• Bhubaneswar</p><p>• Jammu</p><p>• Goa</p><p>• Shimla</p><p>• Raipur</p><p>• Amritsar</p><p>• Jaipur</p><p>• Chennai</p><p>• Hyderabad</p><p>• Surat</p><p>• Ranchi</p><p>• Delhi&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p><p><br>The Ministry of External Affairs plans to expand the issuance of e-passports to all Passport Seva Kendras across India by mid-2025.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Key Benefits for Travellers</strong></p><p>Enhanced Security: The encrypted chip makes it significantly harder to forge or duplicate passports, thereby reducing identity fraud.&nbsp;</p><p>Faster Immigration Processing: E-passports facilitate quicker verification at immigration checkpoints, especially in countries equipped with automated e-gates that recognize ICAO-compliant documents.&nbsp;</p><p>Global Recognition: India joins over 120 countries that have adopted e-passport technology, aligning with international travel standards.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>How to Apply for an E-Passport</strong></p><p>The application process for an e-passport remains the same as that for a traditional passport:&nbsp;</p><p>1.&nbsp;Online Application: Register and apply through the&nbsp;<a href="https://portal2.passportindia.gov.in/">Passport Seva Portal</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>2.&nbsp;Appointment Booking: Schedule an appointment at your nearest Passport Seva Kendra.&nbsp;</p><p>3.&nbsp;Biometric Data Submission: Visit the selected center to submit your biometric data and complete the necessary formalities.</p><p>If your Regional Passport Office is equipped to issue e-passports, you will automatically receive one upon application or renewal.&nbsp;</p><p><br><strong>What Happens to Existing Passports?</strong></p><p>Existing traditional passports will remain valid until their expiry date. There is no immediate requirement to switch to an e-passport. The transition to e-passports will be gradual, ensuring a smooth changeover for all citizens.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>The introduction of e-passports represents a significant step forward in enhancing security and efficiency of international travel. As the rollout continues, travellers can look forward to a more streamlined and secure travel experience.&nbsp;</p>

The Ministry of External Affairs plans to expand the issuance of e-passports to all Passport Seva Kendras across India by mid-2025.  

India has officially launched biometric e-passports in select cities, marking a significant advancement in travel document security and efficiency. This initiative, part of the Passport Seva Programme 2.0, aims to enhance international travel safety and streamline immigration processes for Indian citizens. What Is an E-Passport? An e-passport is a traditional passport booklet embedded with a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip and antenna. This chip securely stores the holder’s personal and biometric information, including their photograph, fingerprints, passport number, and date of birth. The data is encrypted and protected by international security standards such as Basic Access Control (BAC) and Extended Access Control (EAC), making it difficult to forge or tamper with. Where Are E-Passports Being Issued? As of now, e-passports are being issued in the following 13 cities: • Nagpur • Bhubaneswar • Jammu • Goa • Shimla • Raipur • Amritsar • Jaipur • Chennai • Hyderabad • Surat • Ranchi • Delhi The Ministry of External Affairs plans to expand the issuance of e-passports to all Passport Seva Kendras across India by mid-2025. Key Benefits for Travellers Enhanced Security: The encrypted chip makes it significantly harder to forge or duplicate passports, thereby reducing identity fraud. Faster Immigration Processing: E-passports facilitate quicker verification at immigration checkpoints, especially in countries equipped with automated e-gates that recognize ICAO-compliant documents. Global Recognition: India joins over 120 countries that have adopted e-passport technology, aligning with international travel standards. How to Apply for an E-Passport The application process for an e-passport remains the same as that for a traditional passport: 1. Online Application: Register and apply through the Passport Seva Portal. 2. Appointment Booking: Schedule an appointment at your nearest Passport Seva Kendra. 3. Biometric Data Submission: Visit the selected center to submit your biometric data and complete the necessary formalities. If your Regional Passport Office is equipped to issue e-passports, you will automatically receive one upon application or renewal. What Happens to Existing Passports? Existing traditional passports will remain valid until their expiry date. There is no immediate requirement to switch to an e-passport. The transition to e-passports will be gradual, ensuring a smooth changeover for all citizens. The introduction of e-passports represents a significant step forward in enhancing security and efficiency of international travel. As the rollout continues, travellers can look forward to a more streamlined and secure travel experience.

<p>India has officially launched biometric e-passports in selected cities. This initiative, part of the Passport Seva Programme 2.0, aims to enhance international travel safety and streamline immigration processes for Indian citizens.&nbsp;</p>

E-Passport era begins in India: Key cities, benefits & how to apply

<p>Apple’s push to integrate artificial intelligence into iPhones in China is reportedly facing resistance from the Trump administration and US lawmakers. The tech giant’s partnership with Chinese firm Alibaba has triggered national security concerns, reigniting fears over data privacy, censorship, and China’s military edge.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>What’s the deal about?</strong></p><p><br>Apple is quietly pursuing a partnership with Alibaba to bring the Chinese company’s AI capabilities to iPhones sold in China. According to <i>The New York Times</i>, Alibaba Chairman Joe Tsai publicly confirmed the deal in February, although Apple has not made any formal announcement.</p><p><br>With Chinese brands like Huawei and Xiaomi rapidly introducing AI-driven features, Apple views this collaboration as essential for staying competitive in a market that reportedly contributes nearly 20 per cent of its global revenue.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>However, as per <i>The New York Times</i>, this move has drawn sharp scrutiny in Washington. White House officials and the House Select Committee on China have questioned Apple executives about what user data might be shared with Alibaba, and whether the company is entering into binding agreements with Chinese regulators.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Why is the US concerned?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>AI is no longer seen as just a commercial tool — it’s a strategic asset. According to <i>The New York Times</i>, US officials believe AI will play a pivotal role in future military conflicts. They are concerned the Apple-Alibaba deal could help China advance its own AI models, particularly through access to real-world user data.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Lawmakers are also alarmed that working with Alibaba could expose Apple to China’s censorship laws, allowing Beijing to expand the influence of AI chatbots embedded with content controls.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The issue reached a boiling point during a closed-door meeting in March 2025, when Apple executives reportedly failed to adequately answer lawmakers’ questions about the specifics of the deal, <i>The New York Times</i>&nbsp;reported.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Trump tariffs and trade tensions</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Apple’s AI plans unfolded alongside rising trade tensions between the US and China. In April 2025, President Donald Trump announced a steep 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, aiming to slow China’s tech advancement and protect domestic industries. China responded with a 125 per cent retaliatory tariff on US goods, escalating fears of another full-scale trade war.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Amid global economic unease, officials from both countries met in Geneva on May 12 and agreed to a 90-day tariff pause. As part of the truce, the US lowered tariffs to 30 per cent, while China reduced its duties to 10 per cent, according to <i>Reuters</i>. While this temporary deal eased short-term pressure, it did little to resolve deeper structural tensions — especially those tied to emerging technologies like AI.</p><p><br>According to <i>The New York Times</i>, Apple is feeling the squeeze. With its supply chain deeply tied to China, the company is facing higher costs, political heat, and increasing difficulty in navigating two divergent regulatory systems. If Apple is forced to walk away from the Alibaba deal, it may lose vital ground to domestic Chinese rivals rapidly scaling their own AI capabilities.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Apple deal fallout risk and industry impact</strong></p><p><br>Analyst Richard Kramer of Arete Research told <i>The New York Times</i>&nbsp;that if the Alibaba partnership collapses, Apple could face commercial fallout beyond AI. Alibaba is also a key e-commerce partner, crucial for marketing and selling iPhones across China’s hyper-competitive smartphone market.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Pulling out of the deal could leave Apple both technologically and commercially vulnerable in one of its most important regions.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>There’s also a broader implication: US firms enabling Chinese AI companies to access large user bases may inadvertently help China refine its own AI systems. <i>The New York Times</i>&nbsp;notes that these systems could later support China’s military, surveillance, or strategic capabilities.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Companies like Baidu, ByteDance, and Alibaba stand to benefit from such indirect AI development, further fueling Washington’s concerns about unchecked tech transfer and the global race for AI dominance.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Apple’s AI ambitions in China have placed it squarely in the middle of an intensifying tech cold war. What’s at stake is not just the company’s future in China, but also US national security and the international balance of power in the age of artificial intelligence.</p><p><br>&nbsp;</p>

Business & Economy: Apple partnership with Chinese firm Alibaba has triggered national security concerns, reigniting fears over data privacy, censorship, and China military edge.

Apple’s push to integrate artificial intelligence into iPhones in China is reportedly facing resistance from the Trump administration and US lawmakers. The tech giant’s partnership with Chinese firm Alibaba has triggered national security concerns, reigniting fears over data privacy, censorship, and China’s military edge. What’s the deal about? Apple is quietly pursuing a partnership with Alibaba to bring the Chinese company’s AI capabilities to iPhones sold in China. According to The New York Times, Alibaba Chairman Joe Tsai publicly confirmed the deal in February, although Apple has not made any formal announcement. With Chinese brands like Huawei and Xiaomi rapidly introducing AI-driven features, Apple views this collaboration as essential for staying competitive in a market that reportedly contributes nearly 20 per cent of its global revenue. However, as per The New York Times, this move has drawn sharp scrutiny in Washington. White House officials and the House Select Committee on China have questioned Apple executives about what user data might be shared with Alibaba, and whether the company is entering into binding agreements with Chinese regulators. Why is the US concerned? AI is no longer seen as just a commercial tool — it’s a strategic asset. According to The New York Times, US officials believe AI will play a pivotal role in future military conflicts. They are concerned the Apple-Alibaba deal could help China advance its own AI models, particularly through access to real-world user data. Lawmakers are also alarmed that working with Alibaba could expose Apple to China’s censorship laws, allowing Beijing to expand the influence of AI chatbots embedded with content controls. The issue reached a boiling point during a closed-door meeting in March 2025, when Apple executives reportedly failed to adequately answer lawmakers’ questions about the specifics of the deal, The New York Times reported. Trump tariffs and trade tensions Apple’s AI plans unfolded alongside rising trade tensions between the US and China. In April 2025, President Donald Trump announced a steep 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, aiming to slow China’s tech advancement and protect domestic industries. China responded with a 125 per cent retaliatory tariff on US goods, escalating fears of another full-scale trade war. Amid global economic unease, officials from both countries met in Geneva on May 12 and agreed to a 90-day tariff pause. As part of the truce, the US lowered tariffs to 30 per cent, while China reduced its duties to 10 per cent, according to Reuters. While this temporary deal eased short-term pressure, it did little to resolve deeper structural tensions — especially those tied to emerging technologies like AI. According to The New York Times, Apple is feeling the squeeze. With its supply chain deeply tied to China, the company is facing higher costs, political heat, and increasing difficulty in navigating two divergent regulatory systems. If Apple is forced to walk away from the Alibaba deal, it may lose vital ground to domestic Chinese rivals rapidly scaling their own AI capabilities. Apple deal fallout risk and industry impact Analyst Richard Kramer of Arete Research told The New York Times that if the Alibaba partnership collapses, Apple could face commercial fallout beyond AI. Alibaba is also a key e-commerce partner, crucial for marketing and selling iPhones across China’s hyper-competitive smartphone market. Pulling out of the deal could leave Apple both technologically and commercially vulnerable in one of its most important regions. There’s also a broader implication: US firms enabling Chinese AI companies to access large user bases may inadvertently help China refine its own AI systems. The New York Times notes that these systems could later support China’s military, surveillance, or strategic capabilities. Companies like Baidu, ByteDance, and Alibaba stand to benefit from such indirect AI development, further fueling Washington’s concerns about unchecked tech transfer and the global race for AI dominance. Apple’s AI ambitions in China have placed it squarely in the middle of an intensifying tech cold war. What’s at stake is not just the company’s future in China, but also US national security and the international balance of power in the age of artificial intelligence.

<p>Amid US-China trade tension, Apple’s push to integrate artificial intelligence into iPhones in Beijing is reportedly facing resistance from the Trump administration and US lawmakers.&nbsp;</p>

Apple-Alibaba AI deal sparks US backlash: How China ties could derail iPhone AI rollout

<p>India has imposed sweeping new restrictions on imports from Bangladesh, targeting goods worth $770 million, which accounts for 42 per cent of total bilateral imports, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through a directive by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) issued on Saturday, announced immediate port restrictions on several categories of Bangladeshi imports. The decision now bars most affected goods from entering India via land routes, restricting them to select sea ports.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>What does the ban cover?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Among the key sectors hit by this move are garments, processed foods, and plastic items. Of these, garments alone constitute $618 million worth of annual imports. These can now only be brought in through two designated sea ports, cutting off traditional land trade routes that had previously served as the backbone of cross-border commerce.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>According to the GTRI, this change “severely impacts Bangladesh’s most lucrative export channel to India,” especially since the majority of their ready-made garment (RMG) consignments moved via land.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Why India took this step?&nbsp;</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The move is being widely interpreted as retaliatory. Trade experts believe the restrictions reflect India’s response to a series of recent economic and diplomatic developments initiated by Dhaka.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>According to the GTRI, “The restrictions look like India’s response to Dhaka restricting imports from India on a large number of items and its diplomatic pivot towards China.” Over the past year, Bangladesh has gradually imposed several curbs on Indian exports. In April 2025, it banned Indian yarn imports through five key land ports.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>It has also tightened regulations on rice shipments and enforced import bans on a range of Indian goods including paper, tobacco, fish, and powdered milk.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In addition, Dhaka has introduced a new transit fee of 1.8 taka per tonne per kilometre on Indian goods moving through Bangladeshi territory, adding to the operational burden faced by Indian exporters.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Such measures have led to operational delays and mounting frustration among Indian businesses, prompting calls for a calibrated policy response from New Delhi.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Rising Bangladesh-China ties add tension</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>India’s decision also comes amid worsening diplomatic ties and growing China-Bangladesh alignment. The recent change in political leadership in Dhaka—from Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s pro-India government to an interim administration under Muhammad Yunus—has drastically altered regional dynamics.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In March 2025, Yunus visited China and secured USD 2.1 billion in investments across infrastructure and economic cooperation. His controversial remarks in Beijing, calling India’s northeastern states “a landlocked region with no access to the ocean,” have drawn sharp criticism in New Delhi.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Indian officials reportedly viewed these comments as undermining India’s sovereignty and regional connectivity goals, especially in light of ongoing projects like India’s Act East Policy and BIMSTEC corridor plans.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>India-Bangladesh trade ties</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Despite the current friction, India and Bangladesh share a deeply interwoven trade relationship. In FY24, bilateral trade stood at $15.9 billion, with India exporting goods worth $12.5 billion and importing around $3.4 billion, according to data from the Indian Ministry of Commerce and Industry.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>However, India’s textile industry has long expressed concern over what they term “unfair advantages” granted to Bangladeshi exporters.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>These include duty-free imports of Chinese fabrics and generous Bangladeshi government export subsidies, which reportedly provide a 10 to 15 per cent price advantage to Dhaka’s garment producers in the Indian market, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>With these new curbs, India appears to be sending a strong message, not only protecting domestic industries but also signalling disapproval of Dhaka’s shifting geopolitical stance.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

Business & Economy: The decision now bars most affected goods from entering India via land routes, restricting them to select sea ports.

India has imposed sweeping new restrictions on imports from Bangladesh, targeting goods worth $770 million, which accounts for 42 per cent of total bilateral imports, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI). The Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through a directive by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) issued on Saturday, announced immediate port restrictions on several categories of Bangladeshi imports. The decision now bars most affected goods from entering India via land routes, restricting them to select sea ports. What does the ban cover? Among the key sectors hit by this move are garments, processed foods, and plastic items. Of these, garments alone constitute $618 million worth of annual imports. These can now only be brought in through two designated sea ports, cutting off traditional land trade routes that had previously served as the backbone of cross-border commerce. According to the GTRI, this change “severely impacts Bangladesh’s most lucrative export channel to India,” especially since the majority of their ready-made garment (RMG) consignments moved via land. Why India took this step? The move is being widely interpreted as retaliatory. Trade experts believe the restrictions reflect India’s response to a series of recent economic and diplomatic developments initiated by Dhaka. According to the GTRI, “The restrictions look like India’s response to Dhaka restricting imports from India on a large number of items and its diplomatic pivot towards China.” Over the past year, Bangladesh has gradually imposed several curbs on Indian exports. In April 2025, it banned Indian yarn imports through five key land ports. It has also tightened regulations on rice shipments and enforced import bans on a range of Indian goods including paper, tobacco, fish, and powdered milk. In addition, Dhaka has introduced a new transit fee of 1.8 taka per tonne per kilometre on Indian goods moving through Bangladeshi territory, adding to the operational burden faced by Indian exporters. Such measures have led to operational delays and mounting frustration among Indian businesses, prompting calls for a calibrated policy response from New Delhi. Rising Bangladesh-China ties add tension India’s decision also comes amid worsening diplomatic ties and growing China-Bangladesh alignment. The recent change in political leadership in Dhaka—from Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s pro-India government to an interim administration under Muhammad Yunus—has drastically altered regional dynamics. In March 2025, Yunus visited China and secured USD 2.1 billion in investments across infrastructure and economic cooperation. His controversial remarks in Beijing, calling India’s northeastern states “a landlocked region with no access to the ocean,” have drawn sharp criticism in New Delhi. Indian officials reportedly viewed these comments as undermining India’s sovereignty and regional connectivity goals, especially in light of ongoing projects like India’s Act East Policy and BIMSTEC corridor plans. India-Bangladesh trade ties Despite the current friction, India and Bangladesh share a deeply interwoven trade relationship. In FY24, bilateral trade stood at $15.9 billion, with India exporting goods worth $12.5 billion and importing around $3.4 billion, according to data from the Indian Ministry of Commerce and Industry. However, India’s textile industry has long expressed concern over what they term “unfair advantages” granted to Bangladeshi exporters. These include duty-free imports of Chinese fabrics and generous Bangladeshi government export subsidies, which reportedly provide a 10 to 15 per cent price advantage to Dhaka’s garment producers in the Indian market, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI). With these new curbs, India appears to be sending a strong message, not only protecting domestic industries but also signalling disapproval of Dhaka’s shifting geopolitical stance.

<p>India has imposed sweeping new restrictions on imports from Bangladesh, the Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through a DGFT issued on Saturday, announced immediate port restrictions on several categories of Bangladeshi imports.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;</p>

India tightens trade with Bangladesh: $770 million imports now restricted

<p>US President Donald Trump has taken aim at Walmart, urging the retail giant to absorb the cost of tariffs instead of passing them on to consumers. In a sharp rebuke posted on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused the company of hiding behind his trade policies while raking in massive profits.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>“Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain,” Trump wrote. “Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China,&nbsp;they should, as is said, ‘EAT THE TARIFFS’, and not charge valued customers ANYTHING.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>His comments follow Walmart’s announcement earlier this week that it would begin raising prices due to increased import duties. The company, a key player in American retail, cited high tariffs on Chinese goods as the primary driver of the looming price hike.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Walmart retail price hike ultimatum&nbsp;</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>According to Reuters, Walmart CEO Doug McMillon stated on Thursday that the company could not absorb all the tariff costs because of narrow retail margins. However, he assured that Walmart was committed to shielding customers from rising costs as much as possible — especially on essentials like food.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>“We will do our best to keep our prices as low as possible,” McMillon told Reuters. “But we won’t be able to absorb all the pressure imposed by the tariffs.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Following Trump’s remarks, Walmart reiterated its stance in a statement to Reuters: “We have always worked to keep our prices as low as possible and we won’t stop,” said company spokesperson Molly Blakeman. “We’ll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can given the reality of small retail margins.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The retailer, which saw over 3 per cent sales growth to $112 billion in the most recent quarter, has not issued a profit projection for the current quarter, citing the ongoing uncertainty around tariffs.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Trump tariff saga&nbsp;</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>President Trump’s latest confrontation with Walmart is part of a broader and aggressive trade strategy that has seen the US impose tariffs on a range of foreign goods and trading partners.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The latest salvo came on April 2, 2025, when Trump unveiled a new wave of sweeping import duties during his “Liberation Day” announcement, including a staggering 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In retaliation, Beijing responded with reciprocal tariffs of 125 per cent on American goods. The tit-for-tat escalations disrupted global supply chains, drove up costs for consumers, and rattled financial markets.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Although a temporary 90-day tariff pause was agreed , a 10 per cent base tariff on Chinese goods remained in place. The Geneva trade talks held earlier this week were also viewed as a potential turning point.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>According to a joint statement, both sides have agreed to reduce tariffs: the US has brought down its duties from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, while China has cut its retaliatory tariffs from 125 per cent to 10 per cent.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Tariffs have also been raised on goods from Mexico, Vietnam, and South Korea, particularly in industries seen as vital to US national interests.</p><p>Simultaneously, the US-UK trade deal has entered its final negotiation phase, with both nations agreeing to remove certain non-tariff barriers and consider lowering duties on automotive parts and pharmaceuticals. The deal is expected to be signed later this year, aiming to bolster transatlantic trade post-Brexit.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Despite these diplomatic developments, Trump has remained firm on maintaining pressure on countries he views as taking advantage of the American market. Retailers like Walmart, which source about one-third of their products from overseas, primarily China and Mexico are reportedly caught in the middle, forced to balance profit margins against political rhetoric.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>With more than 4,000 stores across the US and 90 per cent of the population living within 10 miles of one, Walmart’s decision to increase prices may have broader implications for American consumers and for Trump’s own inflation-fighting narrative ahead of the 2024 elections.</p>

Business & Economy: Trump comments came after Walmart announced price increases due to high tariffs on Chinese imports, identifying them as the main factor for the price hike.

US President Donald Trump has taken aim at Walmart, urging the retail giant to absorb the cost of tariffs instead of passing them on to consumers. In a sharp rebuke posted on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused the company of hiding behind his trade policies while raking in massive profits. “Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain,” Trump wrote. “Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China, they should, as is said, ‘EAT THE TARIFFS’, and not charge valued customers ANYTHING.” His comments follow Walmart’s announcement earlier this week that it would begin raising prices due to increased import duties. The company, a key player in American retail, cited high tariffs on Chinese goods as the primary driver of the looming price hike. Walmart retail price hike ultimatum According to Reuters, Walmart CEO Doug McMillon stated on Thursday that the company could not absorb all the tariff costs because of narrow retail margins. However, he assured that Walmart was committed to shielding customers from rising costs as much as possible — especially on essentials like food. “We will do our best to keep our prices as low as possible,” McMillon told Reuters. “But we won’t be able to absorb all the pressure imposed by the tariffs.” Following Trump’s remarks, Walmart reiterated its stance in a statement to Reuters: “We have always worked to keep our prices as low as possible and we won’t stop,” said company spokesperson Molly Blakeman. “We’ll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can given the reality of small retail margins.” The retailer, which saw over 3 per cent sales growth to $112 billion in the most recent quarter, has not issued a profit projection for the current quarter, citing the ongoing uncertainty around tariffs. Trump tariff saga President Trump’s latest confrontation with Walmart is part of a broader and aggressive trade strategy that has seen the US impose tariffs on a range of foreign goods and trading partners. The latest salvo came on April 2, 2025, when Trump unveiled a new wave of sweeping import duties during his “Liberation Day” announcement, including a staggering 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods. In retaliation, Beijing responded with reciprocal tariffs of 125 per cent on American goods. The tit-for-tat escalations disrupted global supply chains, drove up costs for consumers, and rattled financial markets. Although a temporary 90-day tariff pause was agreed , a 10 per cent base tariff on Chinese goods remained in place. The Geneva trade talks held earlier this week were also viewed as a potential turning point. According to a joint statement, both sides have agreed to reduce tariffs: the US has brought down its duties from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, while China has cut its retaliatory tariffs from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. Tariffs have also been raised on goods from Mexico, Vietnam, and South Korea, particularly in industries seen as vital to US national interests. Simultaneously, the US-UK trade deal has entered its final negotiation phase, with both nations agreeing to remove certain non-tariff barriers and consider lowering duties on automotive parts and pharmaceuticals. The deal is expected to be signed later this year, aiming to bolster transatlantic trade post-Brexit. Despite these diplomatic developments, Trump has remained firm on maintaining pressure on countries he views as taking advantage of the American market. Retailers like Walmart, which source about one-third of their products from overseas, primarily China and Mexico are reportedly caught in the middle, forced to balance profit margins against political rhetoric. With more than 4,000 stores across the US and 90 per cent of the population living within 10 miles of one, Walmart’s decision to increase prices may have broader implications for American consumers and for Trump’s own inflation-fighting narrative ahead of the 2024 elections.

<p>President Trump criticised Walmart on social media, urging the company to absorb tariff costs rather than transferring them to consumers, highlighting their profits.</p>

Trump tells Walmart to ‘eat the tariffs’ amid retail price hike alarm

<p>Turkey-based Celebi, which provides airport ground handling services in India, has filed a legal challenge against the Indian government’s abrupt decision to revoke its security clearance. According to Reuters, the revocation, announced on May 16, 2025, comes amid rising tensions between India and Turkey, following Ankara’s vocal criticism of India’s military operation against Pakistan.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Celebi Airport Services India, in its filing to the Delhi High Court seen by Reuters, argued that the cancellation was based on “vague” national security concerns and lacked specific reasoning or procedural fairness. The company stated the move threatens the livelihoods of 3,791 employees and could severely damage investor confidence in India. “Mere rhetoric of national security without elaborating upon in what manner an entity is a threat to national security is unsustainable in law,” the filing said, further noting that Celebi had previously passed all required background checks and security vetting before commencing operations.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In revoking Celebi’s clearance, India’s junior aviation minister Murlidhar Mohol stated on X (formerly Twitter) that the government had received requests from across the country to sever ties with the Turkish firm, citing national interests. “Recognising the seriousness of the issue and the call to protect national interests, we have taken cognizance of these requests,” he said.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In its legal submission, Celebi argued that while its shareholders are Turkish, the controlling stake is held by companies not incorporated in Turkey. The Delhi High Court is expected to hear the matter on May 19.</p><p><br><strong>Backdrop: Operation Sindoor and diplomatic fallout</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>India’s move comes in the wake of heightened diplomatic tensions triggered by the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam terror attack in Kashmir, which claimed 26 civilian lives. In retaliation, India launched “Operation Sindoor” on May 7, targeting nine terror training camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Turkey and Azerbaijan were among the few nations to publicly condemn India’s military response. Ankara described the airstrikes as “provocative,” urging restraint and dialogue, while Baku issued a statement criticising the operation and expressing solidarity with Pakistan. These statements were met with fierce backlash within India, prompting both public outrage and political calls for an economic and diplomatic boycott of the two nations.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>India’s economic pushback</strong></p><p><br>In response to Turkey and Azerbaijan’s stance, India initiated a series of economic and cultural measures aimed at curbing bilateral engagement. According to The Times of India, traders in Rajasthan halted imports of Turkish apples, while marble importers in Udaipur suspended shipments from Turkey, once a dominant player in India’s marble trade, supplying nearly 70 per cent of its imports.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>At the institutional level, universities such as Jamia Millia Islamia cancelled Memorandums of Understanding with Turkish government-linked educational institutions, marking a symbolic decoupling in the academic sphere. This was in tandem with Celebi’s expulsion from Indian airports, which disrupted its operations in Delhi, Kerala, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Goa.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Tourism takes a hit</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>One of the most direct economic impacts for Turkey and Azerbaijan is unfolding in the tourism sector. Major travel platforms such as MakeMyTrip and EaseMyTrip reportedly recorded a 60 per cent decline in bookings to Turkey and Azerbaijan, with cancellations spiking by 250 per cent amid the diplomatic fallout.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In 2024, Indian tourists spent approximately ₹42.9 billion in Turkey and ₹26 billion in Azerbaijan, according to estimates cited by NDTV. This spending was concentrated in Istanbul, Cappadocia, Baku, and Gabala—regions heavily dependent on foreign visitors.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The ongoing boycott has put immense pressure on tour operators, hotels, and airlines in both countries, with industry insiders warning of sharp revenue dips in the summer and festive quarters.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>What Celebi’s exit means for Turkey’s economy</strong>?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Celebi’s ejection from India’s aviation market could have a ripple effect on Turkey’s services exports and diplomatic credibility in South Asia. The company, which had invested significantly in ground handling infrastructure across five Indian airports, now faces reputational damage and potential financial losses from idle equipment, workforce layoffs, and terminated contracts.<br>&nbsp;</p><p>India’s broader trade with Turkey is also under strain. According to Financial Express, imports from Turkey during April–February of FY 2024–25 stood at $2.84 billion, down from $3.78 billion in the previous year. Turkish sectors like marble, machinery, and fresh produce have seen shrinking orders from Indian buyers.<br>&nbsp;</p><p>Meanwhile, Azerbaijan—whose tourism industry benefited from a surge in Indian travellers in 2024, with between 243,000 to 250,000 visitors generating $308 million to $311 million in revenue reported by Financial Express. It is now at risk of losing its fastest-growing inbound market. Travel agents say a prolonged boycott could derail the country’s tourism-dependent recovery post-COVID.</p><p><br>The Celebi lawsuit may be the first legal flashpoint in a broader geopolitical showdown, but it is unlikely to be the last. India’s message is clear: nations that align against its national interests, particularly on matters of sovereignty and security, will face economic consequences.</p><p>As the Delhi High Court hears Celebi’s challenge, the outcome will not only shape the firm’s future in India but it could also redefine how India leverages economic tools to defend its geopolitical red lines.</p><p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p><p><br>&nbsp;</p>

According to Reuters, the revocation, announced on May 16, 2025, comes amid rising tensions between India and Turkey, following Ankara’s vocal criticism of India’s military operation against Pakistan.

Turkey-based Celebi, which provides airport ground handling services in India, has filed a legal challenge against the Indian government’s abrupt decision to revoke its security clearance. According to Reuters, the revocation, announced on May 16, 2025, comes amid rising tensions between India and Turkey, following Ankara’s vocal criticism of India’s military operation against Pakistan. Celebi Airport Services India, in its filing to the Delhi High Court seen by Reuters, argued that the cancellation was based on “vague” national security concerns and lacked specific reasoning or procedural fairness. The company stated the move threatens the livelihoods of 3,791 employees and could severely damage investor confidence in India. “Mere rhetoric of national security without elaborating upon in what manner an entity is a threat to national security is unsustainable in law,” the filing said, further noting that Celebi had previously passed all required background checks and security vetting before commencing operations. In revoking Celebi’s clearance, India’s junior aviation minister Murlidhar Mohol stated on X (formerly Twitter) that the government had received requests from across the country to sever ties with the Turkish firm, citing national interests. “Recognising the seriousness of the issue and the call to protect national interests, we have taken cognizance of these requests,” he said. In its legal submission, Celebi argued that while its shareholders are Turkish, the controlling stake is held by companies not incorporated in Turkey. The Delhi High Court is expected to hear the matter on May 19. Backdrop: Operation Sindoor and diplomatic fallout India’s move comes in the wake of heightened diplomatic tensions triggered by the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam terror attack in Kashmir, which claimed 26 civilian lives. In retaliation, India launched “Operation Sindoor” on May 7, targeting nine terror training camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Turkey and Azerbaijan were among the few nations to publicly condemn India’s military response. Ankara described the airstrikes as “provocative,” urging restraint and dialogue, while Baku issued a statement criticising the operation and expressing solidarity with Pakistan. These statements were met with fierce backlash within India, prompting both public outrage and political calls for an economic and diplomatic boycott of the two nations. India’s economic pushback In response to Turkey and Azerbaijan’s stance, India initiated a series of economic and cultural measures aimed at curbing bilateral engagement. According to The Times of India, traders in Rajasthan halted imports of Turkish apples, while marble importers in Udaipur suspended shipments from Turkey, once a dominant player in India’s marble trade, supplying nearly 70 per cent of its imports. At the institutional level, universities such as Jamia Millia Islamia cancelled Memorandums of Understanding with Turkish government-linked educational institutions, marking a symbolic decoupling in the academic sphere. This was in tandem with Celebi’s expulsion from Indian airports, which disrupted its operations in Delhi, Kerala, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Goa. Tourism takes a hit One of the most direct economic impacts for Turkey and Azerbaijan is unfolding in the tourism sector. Major travel platforms such as MakeMyTrip and EaseMyTrip reportedly recorded a 60 per cent decline in bookings to Turkey and Azerbaijan, with cancellations spiking by 250 per cent amid the diplomatic fallout. In 2024, Indian tourists spent approximately ₹42.9 billion in Turkey and ₹26 billion in Azerbaijan, according to estimates cited by NDTV. This spending was concentrated in Istanbul, Cappadocia, Baku, and Gabala—regions heavily dependent on foreign visitors. The ongoing boycott has put immense pressure on tour operators, hotels, and airlines in both countries, with industry insiders warning of sharp revenue dips in the summer and festive quarters. What Celebi’s exit means for Turkey’s economy? Celebi’s ejection from India’s aviation market could have a ripple effect on Turkey’s services exports and diplomatic credibility in South Asia. The company, which had invested significantly in ground handling infrastructure across five Indian airports, now faces reputational damage and potential financial losses from idle equipment, workforce layoffs, and terminated contracts. India’s broader trade with Turkey is also under strain. According to Financial Express, imports from Turkey during April–February of FY 2024–25 stood at $2.84 billion, down from $3.78 billion in the previous year. Turkish sectors like marble, machinery, and fresh produce have seen shrinking orders from Indian buyers. Meanwhile, Azerbaijan—whose tourism industry benefited from a surge in Indian travellers in 2024, with between 243,000 to 250,000 visitors generating $308 million to $311 million in revenue reported by Financial Express. It is now at risk of losing its fastest-growing inbound market. Travel agents say a prolonged boycott could derail the country’s tourism-dependent recovery post-COVID. The Celebi lawsuit may be the first legal flashpoint in a broader geopolitical showdown, but it is unlikely to be the last. India’s message is clear: nations that align against its national interests, particularly on matters of sovereignty and security, will face economic consequences. As the Delhi High Court hears Celebi’s challenge, the outcome will not only shape the firm’s future in India but it could also redefine how India leverages economic tools to defend its geopolitical red lines.

<p>Turkey-based Celebi has filed a legal challenge against the Indian government’s abrupt decision to revoke its security clearance.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

Turkey's Celebi sues India over ‘vague’ clearance pullback amid Pakistan tension

<p dir="ltr"><span>Moody&rsquo;s Ratings stripped the United States of its last top-tier credit rating on Friday, downgrading its long-term issuer rating from Aaa to Aa1. The move reflects mounting concern about America&rsquo;s ballooning debt and structural fiscal deficits, which the agency warned are on an unsustainable trajectory.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The downgrade places Moody&rsquo;s in line with its two major counterparts&mdash;S&amp;P and Fitch Ratings&mdash;which previously downgraded the US sovereign rating in 2011 and 2023, respectively. With the move, all three top credit rating agencies now assess US government debt below the highest grade.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Although Moody&rsquo;s affirmed that the US retains significant credit strengths&mdash;including its resilient economy, deep capital markets, and the global dominance of the US dollar&mdash;it said these no longer fully offset the weakening of America&rsquo;s fiscal health. The agency simultaneously changed the outlook on the rating to &ldquo;stable&rdquo;, suggesting no further immediate downgrade is expected.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In its statement, Moody&rsquo;s cited the failure of successive US administrations and Congress to agree on meaningful fiscal reforms, describing the trend of persistent annual deficits as a key driver of the downgrade.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>&ldquo;We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration,&rdquo; the agency said.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The rating agency projects that the federal budget deficit will grow from 6.4 per cent of GDP in 2024 to nearly 9 per cent by 2035, driven by rising interest payments, increased entitlement spending, and relatively weak revenue generation.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Without reforms, the federal debt burden is expected to rise to 134 per cent of GDP by 2035&mdash;up from 98 per cent today&mdash;marking a sharp increase that would bring it close to post-World War II highs.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Moody&rsquo;s flagged the possibility that extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a central goal of the Republican-controlled Congress and President Donald Trump, would add about $4 trillion to the federal primary deficit (excluding interest payments) over the next decade. That alone, Moody&rsquo;s said, would materially worsen debt affordability and strain fiscal space further.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The agency noted that mandatory spending&mdash;including social security, medicare, and interest payments&mdash;is projected to account for nearly 78 per cent of total federal spending by 2035, up from 73 per cent today. Interest payments, in particular, are set to consume 30 per cent of all government revenue by 2035, compared to 18 per cent in 2024 and just 9 per cent in 2021.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>What will be the impact?</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Though largely expected, the downgrade had an immediate, if modest, impact on financial markets. Yields on 10-year Treasury bonds rose to around 4.49 per cent in after-hours trading, while ETFs tracking longer-term treasury debt fell roughly 1 per cent. The broader equity market also responded, with the S&amp;P 500 ETF declining 0.4 per cent in post-market trading.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Market analysts said the downgrade could push up borrowing costs at the margin, as investors demand higher yields for holding US government debt. Others suggested the symbolic nature of the downgrade might have a limited effect due to the entrenched role of the US dollar and treasuries in global finance.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Still, the move highlights rising concerns about the sustainability of US debt and the political dysfunction that undermines efforts to address it. The announcement came shortly after the GOP-led House Budget Committee failed to advance a major tax-and-spending bill&mdash;one that aimed to extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts. The failure was due to opposition from hardline Republicans demanding steeper spending cuts.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Moody&rsquo;s downgrade also comes amid a wider debate over whether the US is losing its traditional fiscal discipline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently warned Congress that the country&rsquo;s debt trajectory was &ldquo;unsustainable,&rdquo; adding that a crisis could involve &ldquo;a sudden stop in the economy as credit would disappear.&rdquo;</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>Concerns persist</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Moody&rsquo;s emphasised that US institutions, including the Federal Reserve and the constitutional separation of powers, remain strong and are key stabilising factors. However, the agency noted that recent political dysfunction has hampered the policymaking process and created uncertainty over the government&rsquo;s ability to enact long-term fiscal reforms.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>&ldquo;Successive US administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs,&rdquo; Moody&rsquo;s wrote. It warned that without bipartisan action on spending and revenue, the situation would continue to deteriorate.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Analysts also warned that continued reliance on foreign capital to fund US debt&mdash;combined with declining demand for treasuries and heightened geopolitical tensions&mdash;could eventually erode investor confidence.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Although Moody&rsquo;s still sees the US dollar as the dominant reserve currency for the foreseeable future, any shock that triggers a rapid investor pullback could deepen fiscal risks and accelerate the debt crisis.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>Looking ahead</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Moody&rsquo;s stated that the US still has time and institutional capacity to reverse its fiscal trajectory, particularly if bipartisan reforms can be enacted to increase revenue or curb spending growth. A credible long-term fiscal plan could eventually lead to an upgrade in the rating, the agency said.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>On the other hand, a faster-than-expected deterioration in debt metrics&mdash;or a significant erosion in policy credibility and investor confidence&mdash;could prompt further rating actions in the future. While the current rating outlook is stable, Moody&rsquo;s made clear that risks remain tilted toward fiscal deterioration unless political leaders make difficult decisions soon.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In the absence of such action, the downgrade stands as a stark warning: the world&rsquo;s largest economy can no longer count on its historical fiscal reputation alone to preserve its top credit standing.</span></p>

Business & Economy: Moody's projects the budget deficit will grow to nearly 9 per cent by 2035, driven by interest payments, entitlement spending, weak revenue generation

Moody’s Ratings stripped the United States of its last top-tier credit rating on Friday, downgrading its long-term issuer rating from Aaa to Aa1. The move reflects mounting concern about America’s ballooning debt and structural fiscal deficits, which the agency warned are on an unsustainable trajectory. The downgrade places Moody’s in line with its two major counterparts—S&P and Fitch Ratings—which previously downgraded the US sovereign rating in 2011 and 2023, respectively. With the move, all three top credit rating agencies now assess US government debt below the highest grade. Although Moody’s affirmed that the US retains significant credit strengths—including its resilient economy, deep capital markets, and the global dominance of the US dollar—it said these no longer fully offset the weakening of America’s fiscal health. The agency simultaneously changed the outlook on the rating to “stable”, suggesting no further immediate downgrade is expected. In its statement, Moody’s cited the failure of successive US administrations and Congress to agree on meaningful fiscal reforms, describing the trend of persistent annual deficits as a key driver of the downgrade. “We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration,” the agency said. The rating agency projects that the federal budget deficit will grow from 6.4 per cent of GDP in 2024 to nearly 9 per cent by 2035, driven by rising interest payments, increased entitlement spending, and relatively weak revenue generation. Without reforms, the federal debt burden is expected to rise to 134 per cent of GDP by 2035—up from 98 per cent today—marking a sharp increase that would bring it close to post-World War II highs. Moody’s flagged the possibility that extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a central goal of the Republican-controlled Congress and President Donald Trump, would add about $4 trillion to the federal primary deficit (excluding interest payments) over the next decade. That alone, Moody’s said, would materially worsen debt affordability and strain fiscal space further. The agency noted that mandatory spending—including social security, medicare, and interest payments—is projected to account for nearly 78 per cent of total federal spending by 2035, up from 73 per cent today. Interest payments, in particular, are set to consume 30 per cent of all government revenue by 2035, compared to 18 per cent in 2024 and just 9 per cent in 2021. What will be the impact? Though largely expected, the downgrade had an immediate, if modest, impact on financial markets. Yields on 10-year Treasury bonds rose to around 4.49 per cent in after-hours trading, while ETFs tracking longer-term treasury debt fell roughly 1 per cent. The broader equity market also responded, with the S&P 500 ETF declining 0.4 per cent in post-market trading. Market analysts said the downgrade could push up borrowing costs at the margin, as investors demand higher yields for holding US government debt. Others suggested the symbolic nature of the downgrade might have a limited effect due to the entrenched role of the US dollar and treasuries in global finance. Still, the move highlights rising concerns about the sustainability of US debt and the political dysfunction that undermines efforts to address it. The announcement came shortly after the GOP-led House Budget Committee failed to advance a major tax-and-spending bill—one that aimed to extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts. The failure was due to opposition from hardline Republicans demanding steeper spending cuts. Moody’s downgrade also comes amid a wider debate over whether the US is losing its traditional fiscal discipline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently warned Congress that the country’s debt trajectory was “unsustainable,” adding that a crisis could involve “a sudden stop in the economy as credit would disappear.” Concerns persist Moody’s emphasised that US institutions, including the Federal Reserve and the constitutional separation of powers, remain strong and are key stabilising factors. However, the agency noted that recent political dysfunction has hampered the policymaking process and created uncertainty over the government’s ability to enact long-term fiscal reforms. “Successive US administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs,” Moody’s wrote. It warned that without bipartisan action on spending and revenue, the situation would continue to deteriorate. Analysts also warned that continued reliance on foreign capital to fund US debt—combined with declining demand for treasuries and heightened geopolitical tensions—could eventually erode investor confidence. Although Moody’s still sees the US dollar as the dominant reserve currency for the foreseeable future, any shock that triggers a rapid investor pullback could deepen fiscal risks and accelerate the debt crisis. Looking ahead Moody’s stated that the US still has time and institutional capacity to reverse its fiscal trajectory, particularly if bipartisan reforms can be enacted to increase revenue or curb spending growth. A credible long-term fiscal plan could eventually lead to an upgrade in the rating, the agency said. On the other hand, a faster-than-expected deterioration in debt metrics—or a significant erosion in policy credibility and investor confidence—could prompt further rating actions in the future. While the current rating outlook is stable, Moody’s made clear that risks remain tilted toward fiscal deterioration unless political leaders make difficult decisions soon. In the absence of such action, the downgrade stands as a stark warning: the world’s largest economy can no longer count on its historical fiscal reputation alone to preserve its top credit standing.

Moody’s downgrades US credit rating over mounting debt, fiscal gridlock

<p dir="ltr"><span>China&rsquo;s recorded holdings of US Treasuries have dropped below those of the United Kingdom for the first time in over two decades, signalling a shift in global capital dynamics and deepening concerns over geopolitical and economic tensions surrounding US fiscal policy.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>According to the US Treasury Department&rsquo;s latest data, China&rsquo;s holdings fell to $765.4 billion in March, down $18.9 billion from the previous month. Meanwhile, UK investors increased their holdings by nearly $29 billion to $779.3 billion, overtaking China as the second-largest foreign holder of US debt behind Japan. This marks the first time since 2000 that the UK has surpassed China in US Treasury ownership.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The change coincides with a volatile period in financial markets, triggered in part by President Donald Trump&rsquo;s wave of aggressive tariffs against key US trading partners, including China. The escalation&mdash;dubbed &ldquo;Liberation Day&rdquo; by Trump&mdash;sparked a widespread sell-off in treasuries, pushed bond yields higher, and rattled investors globally.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>Foreign demand still strong</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Despite the geopolitical headwinds and concerns over US debt sustainability, overall foreign appetite for US Treasuries remained robust in March. Total foreign holdings rose by $233.1 billion, reaching a record $9.05 trillion, according to the Treasury&rsquo;s International Capital (TIC) report. Net inflows into US long- and short-term securities reached $254.3 billion, largely driven by private foreign investors.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Japan retained its position as the largest foreign holder, increasing its treasury stockpile to $1.1308 trillion. Canada and Belgium also increased their holdings, with Belgium&mdash;often considered a proxy for Chinese custodial accounts&mdash;adding $7.4 billion to reach $402.1 billion. The Cayman Islands, a major centre for hedge fund activity, saw holdings rise $37.5 billion to $455.3 billion.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Still, the rise in foreign holdings masks deeper structural shifts. China&rsquo;s steady, long-term reduction in direct treasury ownership&mdash;from a peak of over $1.3 trillion in 2011&mdash;is widely seen as part of Beijing&rsquo;s strategy to diversify its foreign reserves and reduce dependence on US assets.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Analysts believe a significant portion of Chinese holdings may now be hidden in custodial accounts in Belgium and Luxembourg.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>Bond sell-off raises alarm</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The market chaos in April highlighted a growing unease with US economic management. Yields on the 10-year treasury surged to 4.59 per cent, the highest since February, while the 30-year bond briefly breached 5 per cent, levels not seen since 2023.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>These moves came amid investor concerns that Trump's protectionist policies and erratic fiscal messaging could drive inflation, boost deficits, and erode the appeal of US debt.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The turmoil came days before Moody&rsquo;s downgraded the US credit rating from AAA to Aa1, citing rising deficits and chronic political gridlock. That move followed similar downgrades by Fitch and S&amp;P in previous years.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>While China&rsquo;s recent sales were not sudden, analysts warn that any acceleration in its unwinding of US assets could further destabilise markets. Others argue that Beijing may also be constrained in how far it can go.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Analysts caution that the full picture of China&rsquo;s holdings may remain opaque for months, given the lag in TIC data and China&rsquo;s use of third-party custodians. Meanwhile, hedge funds, European pension funds, and Japanese life insurers have all been named as possible contributors to the recent sell-off.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Trump&rsquo;s tariffs have heightened fears of a prolonged trade conflict, with Chinese officials vowing to &ldquo;fight to the end&rdquo;. As markets brace for further disruptions, the shift in treasury ownership&mdash;while symbolic&mdash;serves as a broader reflection of the fraying economic relationship between the world&rsquo;s two largest economies.</span></p>

Business & Economy: The change coincides with a volatile period in financial markets, triggered in part by Trump’s wave of tariffs against key US trading partners

China’s recorded holdings of US Treasuries have dropped below those of the United Kingdom for the first time in over two decades, signalling a shift in global capital dynamics and deepening concerns over geopolitical and economic tensions surrounding US fiscal policy. According to the US Treasury Department’s latest data, China’s holdings fell to $765.4 billion in March, down $18.9 billion from the previous month. Meanwhile, UK investors increased their holdings by nearly $29 billion to $779.3 billion, overtaking China as the second-largest foreign holder of US debt behind Japan. This marks the first time since 2000 that the UK has surpassed China in US Treasury ownership. The change coincides with a volatile period in financial markets, triggered in part by President Donald Trump’s wave of aggressive tariffs against key US trading partners, including China. The escalation—dubbed “Liberation Day” by Trump—sparked a widespread sell-off in treasuries, pushed bond yields higher, and rattled investors globally. Foreign demand still strong Despite the geopolitical headwinds and concerns over US debt sustainability, overall foreign appetite for US Treasuries remained robust in March. Total foreign holdings rose by $233.1 billion, reaching a record $9.05 trillion, according to the Treasury’s International Capital (TIC) report. Net inflows into US long- and short-term securities reached $254.3 billion, largely driven by private foreign investors. Japan retained its position as the largest foreign holder, increasing its treasury stockpile to $1.1308 trillion. Canada and Belgium also increased their holdings, with Belgium—often considered a proxy for Chinese custodial accounts—adding $7.4 billion to reach $402.1 billion. The Cayman Islands, a major centre for hedge fund activity, saw holdings rise $37.5 billion to $455.3 billion. Still, the rise in foreign holdings masks deeper structural shifts. China’s steady, long-term reduction in direct treasury ownership—from a peak of over $1.3 trillion in 2011—is widely seen as part of Beijing’s strategy to diversify its foreign reserves and reduce dependence on US assets. Analysts believe a significant portion of Chinese holdings may now be hidden in custodial accounts in Belgium and Luxembourg. Bond sell-off raises alarm The market chaos in April highlighted a growing unease with US economic management. Yields on the 10-year treasury surged to 4.59 per cent, the highest since February, while the 30-year bond briefly breached 5 per cent, levels not seen since 2023. These moves came amid investor concerns that Trump's protectionist policies and erratic fiscal messaging could drive inflation, boost deficits, and erode the appeal of US debt. The turmoil came days before Moody’s downgraded the US credit rating from AAA to Aa1, citing rising deficits and chronic political gridlock. That move followed similar downgrades by Fitch and S&P in previous years. While China’s recent sales were not sudden, analysts warn that any acceleration in its unwinding of US assets could further destabilise markets. Others argue that Beijing may also be constrained in how far it can go. Analysts caution that the full picture of China’s holdings may remain opaque for months, given the lag in TIC data and China’s use of third-party custodians. Meanwhile, hedge funds, European pension funds, and Japanese life insurers have all been named as possible contributors to the recent sell-off. Trump’s tariffs have heightened fears of a prolonged trade conflict, with Chinese officials vowing to “fight to the end”. As markets brace for further disruptions, the shift in treasury ownership—while symbolic—serves as a broader reflection of the fraying economic relationship between the world’s two largest economies.

UK overtakes China in US Treasury holdings for first time since 2000

<p dir="ltr"><span>Russia&rsquo;s economy is showing signs of weakening, as official statistics reveal a sharp decline in growth in the first quarter of 2025. According to preliminary data released by the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) on May 16, the country&rsquo;s gross domestic product (GDP) rose by just 1.4 per cent year-on-year. This marks a steep fall from the 4.5 per cent growth reported in the previous quarter and 5.4 per cent in the same period last year.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The slowdown came in below forecasts from both the Russian Economic Development Ministry, which predicted 1.7 per cent, and analysts at Bloomberg, who expected 1.8 per cent. Notably, Rosstat's quarter-on-quarter data showed the economy contracted by 0.4 per cent&mdash;its first quarterly decline since 2022&mdash;signalling growing economic vulnerability.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Experts have attributed the downturn to a combination of factors, including the central bank&rsquo;s high interest rate policy, persistent inflation, supply chain disruptions, and falling revenues from energy exports. From January to April, oil and gas revenues dropped by 10 per cent&mdash;a significant blow to a country that relies heavily on its energy sector.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>Economy in trouble?</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Despite the troubling first quarter, Rosstat recently revised its GDP growth estimate for 2024 upward to 4.3 per cent, citing stronger-than-expected performance in the fourth quarter. However, doubts are growing about the reliability of Russia&rsquo;s economic statistics.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>A report by the Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics (SITE) warned that the Russian economy&rsquo;s resilience is only superficial. It noted deepening structural weaknesses, unsustainable fiscal practices, and an overreliance on military-driven stimulus.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Reuters reported that Torbjorn Becker of SITE pointed to discrepancies in Russia&rsquo;s inflation and monetary policy data as evidence that real GDP growth may be overstated. &ldquo;Russia claims inflation is 9&ndash;10 per cent. Why then is the central bank&rsquo;s key rate set at 21 per cent?&rdquo; he asked, arguing that understated inflation leads to inflated real GDP figures.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The SITE report, presented to European Union finance ministers, further claimed that Russia&rsquo;s budget deficit is likely larger than officially reported due to off-the-books war financing via the banking system. Official figures cite deficits of 2.3 per cent of GDP in 2022, 1.9 per cent in 2023, and 1.7 per cent in 2024&mdash;yet SITE estimates suggest the real fiscal shortfall could be twice as large, raising concerns about looming banking sector risks.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr">War and sanctions compounding economic pressure</h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The long-term impact of sanctions continues to weigh heavily on the Russian economy. The Russian Finance Ministry reportedly acknowledged &ldquo;hundreds of billions of dollars&rdquo; in direct losses to the financial sector, while energy export earnings fell by an estimated $78.5 billion between December 2022 and June 2024, according to the Kyiv School of Economics.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Russia&rsquo;s pivot to a war economy has led to a surge in military spending, but this has come at the cost of consumer sector stability. Civilian businesses are struggling under the burden of soaring interest rates and inflation.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In 2024, inflation reached 9.5 per cent, and bankruptcies rose 26 per cent year-on-year in the first three quarters, totalling 6,392 corporate insolvencies, according to Interfax.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Even as Moscow touts growth figures, Western analysts and institutions like the IMF are sceptical. The IMF estimates that while Russia&rsquo;s economy grew by 3.8 per cent in 2024, growth will slow to 1.4 per cent in 2025 and just 1.2 per cent in 2026.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>Peace talks, but no ceasefire yet</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Adding to the uncertainty are recent developments in the ongoing war in Ukraine. On May 16, Russia and Ukraine held their first direct peace talks since early 2022, agreeing to a large prisoner swap involving 1,000 prisoners each. However, significant gaps remain, especially over the issue of a ceasefire.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Ukrainian officials, backed by Western allies, have insisted on a temporary ceasefire as a first step toward broader peace. Russia has so far resisted this proposal. The two sides exchanged ceasefire proposals and discussed a potential meeting between their presidents, though no agreements were finalised.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Analysts warn that any reduction in military spending following a peace deal could deliver a short-term shock to Russia&rsquo;s already strained economy. Conversely, failure to reach an agreement could trigger a new round of sanctions from the West, compounding existing pressures.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

Business & Economy: According to data released by Rosstat, Russia’s GDP rose by just 1.4 per cent year-on-year, a steep fall from the 4.5 per cent in the last quarter

Russia’s economy is showing signs of weakening, as official statistics reveal a sharp decline in growth in the first quarter of 2025. According to preliminary data released by the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) on May 16, the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) rose by just 1.4 per cent year-on-year. This marks a steep fall from the 4.5 per cent growth reported in the previous quarter and 5.4 per cent in the same period last year. The slowdown came in below forecasts from both the Russian Economic Development Ministry, which predicted 1.7 per cent, and analysts at Bloomberg, who expected 1.8 per cent. Notably, Rosstat's quarter-on-quarter data showed the economy contracted by 0.4 per cent—its first quarterly decline since 2022—signalling growing economic vulnerability. Experts have attributed the downturn to a combination of factors, including the central bank’s high interest rate policy, persistent inflation, supply chain disruptions, and falling revenues from energy exports. From January to April, oil and gas revenues dropped by 10 per cent—a significant blow to a country that relies heavily on its energy sector. Economy in trouble? Despite the troubling first quarter, Rosstat recently revised its GDP growth estimate for 2024 upward to 4.3 per cent, citing stronger-than-expected performance in the fourth quarter. However, doubts are growing about the reliability of Russia’s economic statistics. A report by the Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics (SITE) warned that the Russian economy’s resilience is only superficial. It noted deepening structural weaknesses, unsustainable fiscal practices, and an overreliance on military-driven stimulus. Reuters reported that Torbjorn Becker of SITE pointed to discrepancies in Russia’s inflation and monetary policy data as evidence that real GDP growth may be overstated. “Russia claims inflation is 9–10 per cent. Why then is the central bank’s key rate set at 21 per cent?” he asked, arguing that understated inflation leads to inflated real GDP figures. The SITE report, presented to European Union finance ministers, further claimed that Russia’s budget deficit is likely larger than officially reported due to off-the-books war financing via the banking system. Official figures cite deficits of 2.3 per cent of GDP in 2022, 1.9 per cent in 2023, and 1.7 per cent in 2024—yet SITE estimates suggest the real fiscal shortfall could be twice as large, raising concerns about looming banking sector risks. War and sanctions compounding economic pressure The long-term impact of sanctions continues to weigh heavily on the Russian economy. The Russian Finance Ministry reportedly acknowledged “hundreds of billions of dollars” in direct losses to the financial sector, while energy export earnings fell by an estimated $78.5 billion between December 2022 and June 2024, according to the Kyiv School of Economics. Russia’s pivot to a war economy has led to a surge in military spending, but this has come at the cost of consumer sector stability. Civilian businesses are struggling under the burden of soaring interest rates and inflation. In 2024, inflation reached 9.5 per cent, and bankruptcies rose 26 per cent year-on-year in the first three quarters, totalling 6,392 corporate insolvencies, according to Interfax. Even as Moscow touts growth figures, Western analysts and institutions like the IMF are sceptical. The IMF estimates that while Russia’s economy grew by 3.8 per cent in 2024, growth will slow to 1.4 per cent in 2025 and just 1.2 per cent in 2026. Peace talks, but no ceasefire yet Adding to the uncertainty are recent developments in the ongoing war in Ukraine. On May 16, Russia and Ukraine held their first direct peace talks since early 2022, agreeing to a large prisoner swap involving 1,000 prisoners each. However, significant gaps remain, especially over the issue of a ceasefire. Ukrainian officials, backed by Western allies, have insisted on a temporary ceasefire as a first step toward broader peace. Russia has so far resisted this proposal. The two sides exchanged ceasefire proposals and discussed a potential meeting between their presidents, though no agreements were finalised. Analysts warn that any reduction in military spending following a peace deal could deliver a short-term shock to Russia’s already strained economy. Conversely, failure to reach an agreement could trigger a new round of sanctions from the West, compounding existing pressures.

Are deeper structural risks weighing Russian economy down?

<p><span>Starbucks Corp. is exploring strategic options for its China business, including a possible stake sale, Bloomberg reported.</span></p>
<p><span>The coffee giant, which is facing mounting pressure from local competitors such as Luckin Coffee and Cotti Coffee, has reached out to private equity firms, technology companies, and other potential investors to gauge interest in its operations in the country.</span></p>
<p><span>The move comes as Starbucks grapples with increased competition and macroeconomic challenges in its second-largest market. Despite having more than 7,750 stores in China, the company's revenue in the region has faltered, generating nearly $740 million in the first quarter of 2025. This is well below the $1.2 billion net revenue posted by Luckin Coffee, which has rapidly expanded its footprint in the Chinese coffee market.</span></p>
<p><span>The Bloomberg report suggests the company is considering a transaction that could value its China assets in the billions of dollars. Potential investors are expected to submit initial feedback soon, although it remains unclear whether Starbucks will move forward with a deal.</span></p>
<p><span>During a recent earnings call, Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol reaffirmed the company's long-term commitment to China. Niccol also mentioned that the company has made changes to its product offerings and pricing to improve performance.</span></p>
<p><span>Starbucks' move to explore a potential stake sale follows a similar path taken by other global chains such as McDonald's and Yum! Brands, which both sold stakes in their China operations to private equity firms to better cater to local tastes and tap into growth opportunities.</span></p>
<h2><span><strong>More challenges on the plate</strong></span></h2>
<p><span>In a separate development, Starbucks faces labour unrest in the United States as employees at around 100 unionised locations have walked off the job since Sunday. The strikes are in response to a new dress code policy, which requires baristas to wear solid black tops, replacing the previous policy that allowed employees to wear shirts in any colour. The new policy also introduces stricter guidelines on the bottoms workers can wear.</span></p>
<p><span>Workers United, the union representing baristas at over 570 US Starbucks locations, claims the dress code changes are an attempt by the company to undermine union negotiations. The union filed a complaint with the US National Labor Relations Board, alleging that the changes are unlawful and demonstrate that the company is not negotiating fairly.</span></p>
<p><span>While Starbucks insists that less than 1 per cent of its US workers are participating in the strikes and that most stores have remained open, the labour group maintains that the protests highlight growing dissatisfaction among workers. Starbucks responded by saying that it continues to bargain in good faith and urged the union to return to the negotiating table, emphasising that differences in store policies will be addressed lawfully and fairly.</span></p>
<p><span>As the company faces pressure both from internal labour disputes and external market challenges, the decisions it makes over the next few months will have significant implications for its operations both in the US and abroad.</span></p>

Business & Economy: The coffee giant, which is facing mounting pressure from local competitors has reached out to PE firms, technology firms, and others to gauge interest

Starbucks Corp. is exploring strategic options for its China business, including a possible stake sale, Bloomberg reported. The coffee giant, which is facing mounting pressure from local competitors such as Luckin Coffee and Cotti Coffee, has reached out to private equity firms, technology companies, and other potential investors to gauge interest in its operations in the country. The move comes as Starbucks grapples with increased competition and macroeconomic challenges in its second-largest market. Despite having more than 7,750 stores in China, the company's revenue in the region has faltered, generating nearly $740 million in the first quarter of 2025. This is well below the $1.2 billion net revenue posted by Luckin Coffee, which has rapidly expanded its footprint in the Chinese coffee market. The Bloomberg report suggests the company is considering a transaction that could value its China assets in the billions of dollars. Potential investors are expected to submit initial feedback soon, although it remains unclear whether Starbucks will move forward with a deal. During a recent earnings call, Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol reaffirmed the company's long-term commitment to China. Niccol also mentioned that the company has made changes to its product offerings and pricing to improve performance. Starbucks' move to explore a potential stake sale follows a similar path taken by other global chains such as McDonald's and Yum! Brands, which both sold stakes in their China operations to private equity firms to better cater to local tastes and tap into growth opportunities. More challenges on the plate In a separate development, Starbucks faces labour unrest in the United States as employees at around 100 unionised locations have walked off the job since Sunday. The strikes are in response to a new dress code policy, which requires baristas to wear solid black tops, replacing the previous policy that allowed employees to wear shirts in any colour. The new policy also introduces stricter guidelines on the bottoms workers can wear. Workers United, the union representing baristas at over 570 US Starbucks locations, claims the dress code changes are an attempt by the company to undermine union negotiations. The union filed a complaint with the US National Labor Relations Board, alleging that the changes are unlawful and demonstrate that the company is not negotiating fairly. While Starbucks insists that less than 1 per cent of its US workers are participating in the strikes and that most stores have remained open, the labour group maintains that the protests highlight growing dissatisfaction among workers. Starbucks responded by saying that it continues to bargain in good faith and urged the union to return to the negotiating table, emphasising that differences in store policies will be addressed lawfully and fairly. As the company faces pressure both from internal labour disputes and external market challenges, the decisions it makes over the next few months will have significant implications for its operations both in the US and abroad.

Starbucks explores stake sale for its China business

<p>Japan&rsquo;s economy contracted unexpectedly in the first quarter of 2025, signalling a fragile recovery. The contraction, which marks the first since 2024, has been attributed to a drop in exports, flat consumer spending, and the looming impact of trade tensions with the US, including tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.</p>
<p>According to preliminary data from the Cabinet Office, Japan&rsquo;s real GDP contracted an annualised 0.7 per cent in the January-March period, far worse than the median forecast of a 0.3 per cent drop.</p>
<p>This decline follows a robust 2.4 per cent expansion in the previous quarter, highlighting the vulnerability of the export-heavy economy. With private consumption, which accounts for more than half of the economy, stagnating and net exports contributing negatively to growth, Japan&rsquo;s economic outlook appears increasingly uncertain.</p>
<h2>US tariffs deepen challenges</h2>
<p>The contraction in Japan&rsquo;s economy comes as the country faces mounting challenges from trade tensions with the US, particularly following Trump&rsquo;s sweeping tariff measures. In March, the US imposed a 25 per cent duty on steel and aluminium imports, followed by tariffs on automobiles and other Japanese goods in April. These measures are expected to weigh heavily on Japan&rsquo;s export-driven industries, notably the automotive sector, which is a cornerstone of its economic growth.</p>
<p>Japanese automakers, such as Toyota and Honda, have already signalled that the tariffs are affecting their profitability. Honda recently revised its profit forecast for the fiscal year, and Toyota followed suit. The tariffs could cost Japan&rsquo;s automotive sector an estimated &yen;2 trillion ($13.7 billion) in operating profits for the current financial year, prompting concerns about the broader impact on Japan&rsquo;s economy.</p>
<p>Despite these challenges, Japan has signalled that it is prepared to hold out for a better trade deal with the United States. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has made it a priority to negotiate with the US over tariff exemptions. However, the outcome of these talks remains uncertain as the negotiators have yet to reach a breakthrough, and the pressure is mounting on Japan&rsquo;s leadership to secure a favourable deal.</p>
<p>As Japan&rsquo;s economy faces significant headwinds, much of the focus is now on the negotiations with the US over trade tariffs. Japan&rsquo;s economy minister, Ryosei Akazawa, and finance minister, Katsunobu Kato, have already held several rounds of talks with US officials, but significant hurdles remain.</p>
<p>Japan&rsquo;s starting position is the elimination of all new tariffs, including those on automotive and steel imports, which have been particularly damaging to its largest industries. The question now is whether Japan can win exemptions from these tariffs through continued negotiations or whether it will be forced to accept a deal that could further hamper its economic recovery.</p>
<p>While the US and China have recently negotiated a temporary truce, Japan has not yet made substantial progress in its talks with Washington, leaving the country&rsquo;s economic future hanging in the balance.</p>
<h2>India&rsquo;s rising economic power</h2>
<p>While Japan grapples with economic contraction, India is on a different trajectory. With a large and youthful population, a growing manufacturing base, and increasing digital transformation, India has almost closed the economic gap with Japan.</p>
<p>This shift will soon propel India into the position of the world&rsquo;s fourth-largest economy, as Japan&rsquo;s economic challenges deepen. Experts suggest that, with Japan&rsquo;s economy slowing and India continuing its growth trajectory, India may soon surpass Japan in terms of total GDP.</p>
<p>Although the United Nations has reduced India&rsquo;s 2025 growth forecast to 6.3 per cent, experts still predict that India&rsquo;s economic ascent will continue, potentially shifting the global rankings in the coming years.</p>
<h2>The future of Japan&rsquo;s economy</h2>
<p>Japan&rsquo;s economic vulnerability, coupled with its slowing domestic demand, has raised questions about its ability to withstand the impacts of external trade pressures, particularly in light of India&rsquo;s growing economic influence. While Japan&rsquo;s policymakers face pressure to stimulate growth through fiscal measures or interest rate cuts, they are constrained by political considerations and weak demand.</p>
<p>For Japan, the road ahead is fraught with uncertainty. The ongoing trade challenges, combined with stagnant domestic consumption and global trade disruptions, threaten to undermine the nation&rsquo;s ability to maintain its position as a global economic power. Meanwhile, India&rsquo;s continued rise suggests that Japan may soon face new competition for its spot in the top tier of the world&rsquo;s largest economies.</p>
<p>As Japan grapples with these challenges, the global economic landscape is set to undergo a transformation. The balance of power may soon shift, with countries like India emerging as stronger players in the global economy, while Japan&rsquo;s future hangs in the balance amid ongoing trade tensions and internal stagnation.</p>

Business & Economy: Japan’s real GDP contracted an annualised 0.7 per cent in the January-March period highlighting the vulnerability of the export-heavy economy.

Japan’s economy contracted unexpectedly in the first quarter of 2025, signalling a fragile recovery. The contraction, which marks the first since 2024, has been attributed to a drop in exports, flat consumer spending, and the looming impact of trade tensions with the US, including tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. According to preliminary data from the Cabinet Office, Japan’s real GDP contracted an annualised 0.7 per cent in the January-March period, far worse than the median forecast of a 0.3 per cent drop. This decline follows a robust 2.4 per cent expansion in the previous quarter, highlighting the vulnerability of the export-heavy economy. With private consumption, which accounts for more than half of the economy, stagnating and net exports contributing negatively to growth, Japan’s economic outlook appears increasingly uncertain. US tariffs deepen challenges The contraction in Japan’s economy comes as the country faces mounting challenges from trade tensions with the US, particularly following Trump’s sweeping tariff measures. In March, the US imposed a 25 per cent duty on steel and aluminium imports, followed by tariffs on automobiles and other Japanese goods in April. These measures are expected to weigh heavily on Japan’s export-driven industries, notably the automotive sector, which is a cornerstone of its economic growth. Japanese automakers, such as Toyota and Honda, have already signalled that the tariffs are affecting their profitability. Honda recently revised its profit forecast for the fiscal year, and Toyota followed suit. The tariffs could cost Japan’s automotive sector an estimated ¥2 trillion ($13.7 billion) in operating profits for the current financial year, prompting concerns about the broader impact on Japan’s economy. Despite these challenges, Japan has signalled that it is prepared to hold out for a better trade deal with the United States. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has made it a priority to negotiate with the US over tariff exemptions. However, the outcome of these talks remains uncertain as the negotiators have yet to reach a breakthrough, and the pressure is mounting on Japan’s leadership to secure a favourable deal. As Japan’s economy faces significant headwinds, much of the focus is now on the negotiations with the US over trade tariffs. Japan’s economy minister, Ryosei Akazawa, and finance minister, Katsunobu Kato, have already held several rounds of talks with US officials, but significant hurdles remain. Japan’s starting position is the elimination of all new tariffs, including those on automotive and steel imports, which have been particularly damaging to its largest industries. The question now is whether Japan can win exemptions from these tariffs through continued negotiations or whether it will be forced to accept a deal that could further hamper its economic recovery. While the US and China have recently negotiated a temporary truce, Japan has not yet made substantial progress in its talks with Washington, leaving the country’s economic future hanging in the balance. India’s rising economic power While Japan grapples with economic contraction, India is on a different trajectory. With a large and youthful population, a growing manufacturing base, and increasing digital transformation, India has almost closed the economic gap with Japan. This shift will soon propel India into the position of the world’s fourth-largest economy, as Japan’s economic challenges deepen. Experts suggest that, with Japan’s economy slowing and India continuing its growth trajectory, India may soon surpass Japan in terms of total GDP. Although the United Nations has reduced India’s 2025 growth forecast to 6.3 per cent, experts still predict that India’s economic ascent will continue, potentially shifting the global rankings in the coming years. The future of Japan’s economy Japan’s economic vulnerability, coupled with its slowing domestic demand, has raised questions about its ability to withstand the impacts of external trade pressures, particularly in light of India’s growing economic influence. While Japan’s policymakers face pressure to stimulate growth through fiscal measures or interest rate cuts, they are constrained by political considerations and weak demand. For Japan, the road ahead is fraught with uncertainty. The ongoing trade challenges, combined with stagnant domestic consumption and global trade disruptions, threaten to undermine the nation’s ability to maintain its position as a global economic power. Meanwhile, India’s continued rise suggests that Japan may soon face new competition for its spot in the top tier of the world’s largest economies. As Japan grapples with these challenges, the global economic landscape is set to undergo a transformation. The balance of power may soon shift, with countries like India emerging as stronger players in the global economy, while Japan’s future hangs in the balance amid ongoing trade tensions and internal stagnation.

Japan’s economy contracts amid US tariff strains, India poised to overtake

US President Donald Trump urged Apple CEO Tim Cook to stop expanding manufacturing in India, expressing concern during their recent conversation in Qatar. Watch this report for more details!

Trump wants Apple to stop moving iPhone production to India

<div class="x_elementToProof" data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">In a decisive move to stabilise its economy and shore up domestic demand, China's first reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cut of 2025 came into effect as re0ported by Reuters. The People&rsquo;s Bank of China (PBOC) slashed the RRR by 0.5 percentage points for eligible financial institutions, a step that will inject roughly 1 trillion yuan (about 139 billion US dollars) of long-term liquidity into the banking system.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The RRR cut, which took effect on May 15, is expected to reduce borrowing costs, ease liquidity pressures in the financial sector, and boost lending to businesses and consumers. The central bank also reduced the RRR to zero for auto financing and financial leasing companies, a move aimed at stimulating spending on vehicles and equipment upgrades.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">This is part of a broader package of monetary easing measures announced earlier this month, including a 10-basis point reduction in the 7-day reverse repo rate to 1.40 per cent and increased support through targeted relending facilities.&nbsp;</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The stimulus measures also include expanded equity investment capacity for insurance companies by 60 billion yuan, mortgage rate reductions for certain homebuyers, and new relending tools to support tech bond purchases and elderly care investments.</div>
<h2 class="x_elementToProof"><b>Why Now?</b><b></b></h2>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The RRR cut appears strategically timed, comes just days after high-stakes trade talks between Chinese officials and a US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and chief trade negotiator Jamieson Greer took place in Switzerland.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">Analysts say the liquidity injection is more than just monetary policy, it&rsquo;s a tactical move designed to buffer the domestic economy from the adverse effects of prolonged tariff tensions with the US. China has been under growing pressure as its export-driven industries face rising costs and declining overseas demand.</div>
<h2 class="x_elementToProof"><b>Trump&rsquo;s Tariff War: A Trade Deal Still Hanging</b><b></b></h2>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The fresh policy moves come against the backdrop of former US President Donald Trump&rsquo;s aggressive tariff regime, which has sent shockwaves through the global economy. According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the US under Trump imposed tariffs on over 360 billion US dollars&rsquo; worth of Chinese goods between 2018 and 2020 &mdash; with some levies reaching up to 25 per cent.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The latest salvo came on April 2, 2025, when Trump unveiled a new wave of sweeping import duties during his &ldquo;Liberation Day&rdquo; announcement &mdash; including a staggering 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">In retaliation, Beijing responded with reciprocal tariffs of 125 per cent on American goods. The tit-for-tat escalations disrupted global supply chains, drove up costs for consumers, and rattled financial markets.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">Although a temporary 90-day tariff pause was agreed , a 10 per cent base tariff on Chinese goods remained in place. The Geneva trade talks held earlier this week were also viewed as a potential turning point. According to a joint statement, both sides have agreed to reduce tariffs: the US has brought down its duties from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, while China has cut its retaliatory tariffs from 125 per cent to 10 per cent.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">As the US-China trade saga enters a new chapter, China&rsquo;s monetary policy pivot underscores a shifting global narrative. No longer content to merely defend its position, Beijing is now proactively reshaping its internal economic resilience.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">While trade diplomacy plays out on the world stage, the PBOC&rsquo;s RRR cut and accompanying stimulus measures signal that China is preparing for a long-haul game &mdash; one that blends tactical monetary easing with strategic economic recalibration.</div>

Business & Economy: This strategic move is expected to infuse approximately trillion yuan, equivalent to about billion US dollars, into the banking system, fostering long-term stability.

In a decisive move to stabilise its economy and shore up domestic demand, China's first reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cut of 2025 came into effect as re0ported by Reuters. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) slashed the RRR by 0.5 percentage points for eligible financial institutions, a step that will inject roughly 1 trillion yuan (about 139 billion US dollars) of long-term liquidity into the banking system. The RRR cut, which took effect on May 15, is expected to reduce borrowing costs, ease liquidity pressures in the financial sector, and boost lending to businesses and consumers. The central bank also reduced the RRR to zero for auto financing and financial leasing companies, a move aimed at stimulating spending on vehicles and equipment upgrades. This is part of a broader package of monetary easing measures announced earlier this month, including a 10-basis point reduction in the 7-day reverse repo rate to 1.40 per cent and increased support through targeted relending facilities. The stimulus measures also include expanded equity investment capacity for insurance companies by 60 billion yuan, mortgage rate reductions for certain homebuyers, and new relending tools to support tech bond purchases and elderly care investments. Why Now? The RRR cut appears strategically timed, comes just days after high-stakes trade talks between Chinese officials and a US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and chief trade negotiator Jamieson Greer took place in Switzerland. Analysts say the liquidity injection is more than just monetary policy, it’s a tactical move designed to buffer the domestic economy from the adverse effects of prolonged tariff tensions with the US. China has been under growing pressure as its export-driven industries face rising costs and declining overseas demand. Trump’s Tariff War: A Trade Deal Still Hanging The fresh policy moves come against the backdrop of former US President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff regime, which has sent shockwaves through the global economy. According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the US under Trump imposed tariffs on over 360 billion US dollars’ worth of Chinese goods between 2018 and 2020 — with some levies reaching up to 25 per cent. The latest salvo came on April 2, 2025, when Trump unveiled a new wave of sweeping import duties during his “Liberation Day” announcement — including a staggering 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods. In retaliation, Beijing responded with reciprocal tariffs of 125 per cent on American goods. The tit-for-tat escalations disrupted global supply chains, drove up costs for consumers, and rattled financial markets. Although a temporary 90-day tariff pause was agreed , a 10 per cent base tariff on Chinese goods remained in place. The Geneva trade talks held earlier this week were also viewed as a potential turning point. According to a joint statement, both sides have agreed to reduce tariffs: the US has brought down its duties from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, while China has cut its retaliatory tariffs from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. As the US-China trade saga enters a new chapter, China’s monetary policy pivot underscores a shifting global narrative. No longer content to merely defend its position, Beijing is now proactively reshaping its internal economic resilience. While trade diplomacy plays out on the world stage, the PBOC’s RRR cut and accompanying stimulus measures signal that China is preparing for a long-haul game — one that blends tactical monetary easing with strategic economic recalibration.

China’s first RRR cut for financial institutions in 2025 takes effect amid trump tariff fiasco

<div>As the United States and China intensify their economic rivalry, Europe finds itself increasingly caught in the middle&mdash;vulnerable to becoming a dumping ground for Chinese goods shut out of the American market. Despite the European Union&rsquo;s (EU) efforts to balance relations with both superpowers, China&rsquo;s rapidly growing trade surplus with the EU is triggering alarm across the continent and exposing cracks in Europe&rsquo;s open-market model.</div>
<div>As the United States and China escalate their economic rivalry and with no long-term certain solution in sight, Europe finds itself caught in the crossfire, increasingly vulnerable to becoming a fallback market for Chinese goods squeezed out of the US economy. Despite the European Union&rsquo;s (EU) efforts to maintain balanced relations with both economic giants, China&rsquo;s growing trade surplus with the EU is raising alarm across the continent.</div>
<div>In the first four months of 2025 alone, China&rsquo;s trade surplus with the EU surged to a record $90 billion, underlining the shift in global trade patterns as the US imposed reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries. With American levies on Chinese goods still up to 30 percentage points higher than they were at the start of this year, much of China&rsquo;s excess production is being increasingly redirected toward Europe&mdash;some through Southeast Asia and Latin America.</div>
<div>According to a report by Bloomberg, Maxime Darmet, senior economist at Allianz Trade, said, &ldquo;European and non-US markets are going to see an increase in Chinese shipments.&rdquo;</div>
<div>&ldquo;China will want to keep global market share at a high level, so will try to increase share in other markets,&rdquo; Darmet added.</div>
<h2><span>The new trade battlefield</span></h2>
<div>The shifting trade tides are testing the EU&rsquo;s core principles of economic openness. As Washington embraced a more protectionist stance, Brussels had to recalibrate its trade strategy. The EU has responded with targeted measures&mdash;such as tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs)&mdash;but has so far resisted a full-scale trade war.</div>
<div>At the heart of the trade imbalance lies China&rsquo;s aggressive industrial policy. State subsidies, particularly in the electric vehicle sector, have helped Chinese companies like BYD undercut competitors around the world. In 2024, BYD sold 4.27 million new vehicles globally, a 41 per cent jump from the previous year. Of those, 1.76 million were fully electric, putting BYD just behind Tesla in global EV sales. China&rsquo;s plug-in hybrid sales also soared 72.83 per cent to 2.49 million units.</div>
<div>The European Commission&rsquo;s move to impose duties on these heavily subsidised imports in late 2024 sparked outrage in Beijing. In retaliation, China launched an anti-dumping investigation into European dairy products, including cheese and milk&mdash;an echo of past tit-for-tat trade tensions and a sign that hostilities are broadening beyond vehicles and technology.</div>
<div>Despite these disputes, China remains the EU&rsquo;s largest trading partner, and the EU is China's second-largest. More than half of EU imports from China consist of mechanical appliances and electrical equipment, while vehicles and aircraft account for less than 6 per cent. On the export side, mechanical appliances and electrical equipment also lead, followed by vehicles and pharmaceuticals.</div>
<h2><span>Germany and France at the forefront of the storm</span></h2>
<div>Germany has been particularly impacted by the changing trade dynamics. The bilateral trade relationship with China, once marked by a German surplus, has flipped dramatically. In 2020, China had a trade deficit of over $18 billion with Germany. By 2024, that had reversed to a $12 billion surplus, and if current trends hold, China&rsquo;s surplus with Germany could exceed $25 billion in 2025.</div>
<div>One major factor has been the rapid rise in Chinese car exports, including both EVs and conventional models, while German exports to China, especially cars, have declined. Despite EU tariffs curbing EV imports, Chinese automakers have ramped up deliveries of hybrids and combustion-engine vehicles, maintaining their momentum in the European market.</div>
<div>France, too, is in the spotlight as it prepares for high-level talks with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng. The meeting comes after a temporary 90-day truce between Washington and Beijing, which lowered some tariffs but left many trade barriers firmly in place. European markets welcomed the pause, but economists remain wary, warning that the underlying tensions are far from resolved.</div>
<div>Meanwhile, the EU&rsquo;s trade chief Maros Sefcovic acknowledged the growing concerns last week, stating that the bloc is &ldquo;monitoring possible risks of trade diversion&rdquo;. Initial assessments are expected in mid-May, with the topic likely to dominate the agenda at Thursday&rsquo;s meeting of EU trade ministers in Brussels.</div>
<h2><span>Currency and competitiveness</span></h2>
<div>Further complicating matters is the recent weakening of the Chinese yuan, which in April 2025 hit its lowest level against the euro in more than a decade. This currency slump makes Chinese exports even more attractive to European buyers, increasing competitive pressure on domestic producers already battling deflation and sluggish demand.</div>
<div>As imports from China swell, EU exports to China are faltering. Between January 2023 and December 2024, EU exports to China dropped 12.5 per cent, while imports from China decreased by just 4.9 per cent. This decline in European exports contrasts sharply with a 3 per cent increase in exports to other non-EU countries during the same period.</div>
<div>Monthly trade data reinforces the trend: EU exports to China fell from &euro;19.2 billion ($21.5 billion) in January 2023 to &euro;16.8 billion ($18.8 billion) in December 2024, with the trade deficit peaking at &euro;29 billion ($32.5 million) in August 2024. Though imports from China also declined slightly, the overall deficit remains steep, underscoring Europe&rsquo;s dependence on Chinese goods amid weakening demand for European products in China.</div>
<h2><span>More protectionism likely?</span></h2>
<div>The evolving trade conflict has already altered the strategy of European capitals. Policymakers are increasingly under pressure to safeguard their industries&mdash;not only from Chinese competition but also from the collateral damage of US policies aimed squarely at Beijing.</div>
<div>With the global trade system becoming more fragmented, economists predict that Europe will continue to introduce more non-tariff barriers and subsidies for critical industries. The European Commission is expected to intensify efforts to prevent unfair competition, especially in sectors like automotive, green technology, and advanced manufacturing.</div>
<div>Whether Europe can maintain its identity as a bastion of free trade while protecting its industrial base in this era of geopolitical rivalry remains one of the defining challenges of the post-pandemic global economy.</div>

Business & Economy: In the first four months of 2025, China’s trade surplus with the EU surged to a record $90 billion, underlining the shift in global trade patterns

As the United States and China intensify their economic rivalry, Europe finds itself increasingly caught in the middle—vulnerable to becoming a dumping ground for Chinese goods shut out of the American market. Despite the European Union’s (EU) efforts to balance relations with both superpowers, China’s rapidly growing trade surplus with the EU is triggering alarm across the continent and exposing cracks in Europe’s open-market model. As the United States and China escalate their economic rivalry and with no long-term certain solution in sight, Europe finds itself caught in the crossfire, increasingly vulnerable to becoming a fallback market for Chinese goods squeezed out of the US economy. Despite the European Union’s (EU) efforts to maintain balanced relations with both economic giants, China’s growing trade surplus with the EU is raising alarm across the continent. In the first four months of 2025 alone, China’s trade surplus with the EU surged to a record $90 billion, underlining the shift in global trade patterns as the US imposed reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries. With American levies on Chinese goods still up to 30 percentage points higher than they were at the start of this year, much of China’s excess production is being increasingly redirected toward Europe—some through Southeast Asia and Latin America. According to a report by Bloomberg, Maxime Darmet, senior economist at Allianz Trade, said, “European and non-US markets are going to see an increase in Chinese shipments.” “China will want to keep global market share at a high level, so will try to increase share in other markets,” Darmet added. The new trade battlefield The shifting trade tides are testing the EU’s core principles of economic openness. As Washington embraced a more protectionist stance, Brussels had to recalibrate its trade strategy. The EU has responded with targeted measures—such as tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs)—but has so far resisted a full-scale trade war. At the heart of the trade imbalance lies China’s aggressive industrial policy. State subsidies, particularly in the electric vehicle sector, have helped Chinese companies like BYD undercut competitors around the world. In 2024, BYD sold 4.27 million new vehicles globally, a 41 per cent jump from the previous year. Of those, 1.76 million were fully electric, putting BYD just behind Tesla in global EV sales. China’s plug-in hybrid sales also soared 72.83 per cent to 2.49 million units. The European Commission’s move to impose duties on these heavily subsidised imports in late 2024 sparked outrage in Beijing. In retaliation, China launched an anti-dumping investigation into European dairy products, including cheese and milk—an echo of past tit-for-tat trade tensions and a sign that hostilities are broadening beyond vehicles and technology. Despite these disputes, China remains the EU’s largest trading partner, and the EU is China's second-largest. More than half of EU imports from China consist of mechanical appliances and electrical equipment, while vehicles and aircraft account for less than 6 per cent. On the export side, mechanical appliances and electrical equipment also lead, followed by vehicles and pharmaceuticals. Germany and France at the forefront of the storm Germany has been particularly impacted by the changing trade dynamics. The bilateral trade relationship with China, once marked by a German surplus, has flipped dramatically. In 2020, China had a trade deficit of over $18 billion with Germany. By 2024, that had reversed to a $12 billion surplus, and if current trends hold, China’s surplus with Germany could exceed $25 billion in 2025. One major factor has been the rapid rise in Chinese car exports, including both EVs and conventional models, while German exports to China, especially cars, have declined. Despite EU tariffs curbing EV imports, Chinese automakers have ramped up deliveries of hybrids and combustion-engine vehicles, maintaining their momentum in the European market. France, too, is in the spotlight as it prepares for high-level talks with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng. The meeting comes after a temporary 90-day truce between Washington and Beijing, which lowered some tariffs but left many trade barriers firmly in place. European markets welcomed the pause, but economists remain wary, warning that the underlying tensions are far from resolved. Meanwhile, the EU’s trade chief Maros Sefcovic acknowledged the growing concerns last week, stating that the bloc is “monitoring possible risks of trade diversion”. Initial assessments are expected in mid-May, with the topic likely to dominate the agenda at Thursday’s meeting of EU trade ministers in Brussels. Currency and competitiveness Further complicating matters is the recent weakening of the Chinese yuan, which in April 2025 hit its lowest level against the euro in more than a decade. This currency slump makes Chinese exports even more attractive to European buyers, increasing competitive pressure on domestic producers already battling deflation and sluggish demand. As imports from China swell, EU exports to China are faltering. Between January 2023 and December 2024, EU exports to China dropped 12.5 per cent, while imports from China decreased by just 4.9 per cent. This decline in European exports contrasts sharply with a 3 per cent increase in exports to other non-EU countries during the same period. Monthly trade data reinforces the trend: EU exports to China fell from €19.2 billion ($21.5 billion) in January 2023 to €16.8 billion ($18.8 billion) in December 2024, with the trade deficit peaking at €29 billion ($32.5 million) in August 2024. Though imports from China also declined slightly, the overall deficit remains steep, underscoring Europe’s dependence on Chinese goods amid weakening demand for European products in China. More protectionism likely? The evolving trade conflict has already altered the strategy of European capitals. Policymakers are increasingly under pressure to safeguard their industries—not only from Chinese competition but also from the collateral damage of US policies aimed squarely at Beijing. With the global trade system becoming more fragmented, economists predict that Europe will continue to introduce more non-tariff barriers and subsidies for critical industries. The European Commission is expected to intensify efforts to prevent unfair competition, especially in sectors like automotive, green technology, and advanced manufacturing. Whether Europe can maintain its identity as a bastion of free trade while protecting its industrial base in this era of geopolitical rivalry remains one of the defining challenges of the post-pandemic global economy.

US-China trade rift may turn Europe into a dumping ground for Chinese goods

<div class="x_elementToProof" data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">Trade ministers from 21 Asia-Pacific nations kicked off a crucial summit on Thursday, only to be greeted by a sobering economic outlook. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum warned that regional exports will see near-stagnant growth in 2025, a direct consequence of the sweeping tariffs reimposed under former US President Donald Trump&rsquo;s trade policy revival.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">According to APEC&rsquo;s latest regional trends analysis, exports among member economies are projected to rise by just 0.4 per cent this year, a steep decline from the 5.7 per cent growth recorded in 2024. Regional GDP is also forecast to grow at a sluggish 2.6 per cent, revised down from the previous estimate of 3.3 per cent, as reported by Reuters.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">&ldquo;Trade growth is set to decline sharply across APEC due to lower external demand, particularly in manufacturing and consumer goods, while rising uncertainty over goods-related measures weighs on services trade,&rdquo; APEC said in an official statement, as quoted by Reuters.</div>
<h2 class="x_elementToProof"><b>The Trump tariff effect</b><b></b></h2>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The downturn in trade coincides with the revival of tariff policies by the Trump administration, which has targeted more than half of APEC&rsquo;s member nations. Since the forum&rsquo;s inception in 1989, regional average tariff rates had dropped from 17 per cent to 5.3 per cent by 2021, contributing to a more than nine-fold increase in merchandise trade. However, Trump&rsquo;s recent tariff reinstatements threaten to reverse decades of economic integration.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">&ldquo;We&rsquo;re moving as quickly as we possibly can with folks who want to be ambitious,&rdquo; US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC before departing for Jeju, declining further comment on his bilateral meeting schedule, Reuters reported.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The tariff measures have already triggered visible shifts in trade flows and investor sentiment. Economists warn that if the US continues its protectionist stance, sectors such as manufacturing, electronics, and consumer goods could face long-term disruptions.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">Meanwhile, China&rsquo;s Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also attended the gathering. Although Reuters reports that no formal meeting with Greer has been confirmed, both sides had agreed to reduce steep tariffs during their initial face-to-face talks in Geneva on 10&ndash;11 May.</div>
<h2 class="x_elementToProof"><b>WTO reform &amp; bilateral deals</b><b></b></h2>
<div class="x_elementToProof">The Jeju summit is also being viewed as a staging ground for broader discussions on World Trade Organization (WTO) reforms, a hot-button issue after Washington recently moved to pause US funding to the institution. The Trump administration has long accused the WTO of enabling China&rsquo;s rise through what it terms &ldquo;unfair export advantages.&rdquo;</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">Trade representatives are holding bilateral discussions on the sidelines of the summit, which forms part of the lead-up to the APEC leaders&rsquo; summit later this year in Gyeongju, South Korea.</div>
<div class="x_elementToProof"></div>
<div class="x_elementToProof">APEC, which accounts for 60 per cent of global GDP and half of global trade, remains a key pillar of global economic stability. But with tariff battles heating up and multilateralism on the defensive, the forum faces one of its most pivotal chapters yet.</div>

Business & Economy: APEC's latest report highlights exports among member economies are projected to rise by just 0.4 per cent this year, a steep decline from the 5.7 per cent growth recorded in 2024.

Trade ministers from 21 Asia-Pacific nations kicked off a crucial summit on Thursday, only to be greeted by a sobering economic outlook. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum warned that regional exports will see near-stagnant growth in 2025, a direct consequence of the sweeping tariffs reimposed under former US President Donald Trump’s trade policy revival. According to APEC’s latest regional trends analysis, exports among member economies are projected to rise by just 0.4 per cent this year, a steep decline from the 5.7 per cent growth recorded in 2024. Regional GDP is also forecast to grow at a sluggish 2.6 per cent, revised down from the previous estimate of 3.3 per cent, as reported by Reuters. “Trade growth is set to decline sharply across APEC due to lower external demand, particularly in manufacturing and consumer goods, while rising uncertainty over goods-related measures weighs on services trade,” APEC said in an official statement, as quoted by Reuters. The Trump tariff effect The downturn in trade coincides with the revival of tariff policies by the Trump administration, which has targeted more than half of APEC’s member nations. Since the forum’s inception in 1989, regional average tariff rates had dropped from 17 per cent to 5.3 per cent by 2021, contributing to a more than nine-fold increase in merchandise trade. However, Trump’s recent tariff reinstatements threaten to reverse decades of economic integration. “We’re moving as quickly as we possibly can with folks who want to be ambitious,” US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC before departing for Jeju, declining further comment on his bilateral meeting schedule, Reuters reported. The tariff measures have already triggered visible shifts in trade flows and investor sentiment. Economists warn that if the US continues its protectionist stance, sectors such as manufacturing, electronics, and consumer goods could face long-term disruptions. Meanwhile, China’s Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also attended the gathering. Although Reuters reports that no formal meeting with Greer has been confirmed, both sides had agreed to reduce steep tariffs during their initial face-to-face talks in Geneva on 10–11 May. WTO reform & bilateral deals The Jeju summit is also being viewed as a staging ground for broader discussions on World Trade Organization (WTO) reforms, a hot-button issue after Washington recently moved to pause US funding to the institution. The Trump administration has long accused the WTO of enabling China’s rise through what it terms “unfair export advantages.” Trade representatives are holding bilateral discussions on the sidelines of the summit, which forms part of the lead-up to the APEC leaders’ summit later this year in Gyeongju, South Korea. APEC, which accounts for 60 per cent of global GDP and half of global trade, remains a key pillar of global economic stability. But with tariff battles heating up and multilateralism on the defensive, the forum faces one of its most pivotal chapters yet.

APEC sounds alarm on sluggish trade growth amid escalating US tariff pressure

<div>US President Donald Trump has announced a series of landmark economic and defence deals with Qatar, with total agreements worth approximately $243.5 billion and setting the foundation for a broader $1.2 trillion economic commitment.</div>
<div>The deals were signed during Trump&rsquo;s visit to Qatar&rsquo;s capital city, Doha&mdash;the second leg of his ongoing West Asia trip&mdash;and span aviation, energy, defence, quantum technology, and infrastructure, and are expected to generate over 1 million US jobs in the coming years.</div>
<div>The centrepiece of the agreements is a $96 billion deal between Boeing, GE Aerospace, and Qatar Airways for the purchase of up to 210 widebody aircraft, marking Boeing&rsquo;s largest-ever order for both the 787 Dreamliner and the 777X.</div>
<div>The White House hailed the deal as a catalyst for &ldquo;a new Golden Age&rdquo; of American manufacturing and innovation, underlining Trump's signature "America First" economic diplomacy.</div>
<h2><b>Boeing&rsquo;s record deal with Qatar Airways</b></h2>
<div>The aviation sector was at the forefront of Trump&rsquo;s announcement, with Boeing and GE Aerospace finalising a $96 billion agreement with Qatar Airways to supply up to 210 aircraft&mdash;an unprecedented deal in both scale and significance.</div>
<div>Qatar Airways CEO Badr Mohammed al-Meer called the deal &ldquo;historic&rdquo;, stating that the investment supports the airline&rsquo;s mission to build the &ldquo;cleanest, youngest, and most efficient fleet in global aviation.&rdquo; The aircraft will be powered exclusively by GE Aerospace engines, adding to the strategic impact for US manufacturing.</div>
<div>According to the White House, the agreement is projected to support 154,000 US jobs annually, amounting to over 1 million American jobs across the production and delivery lifecycle.</div>
<div>While the US administration touted Qatar's orders as a record for Boeing jets, the firm's ability to deliver has come into question. Boeing is currently struggling to keep up with deliveries of the previous order.</div>
<div>The firm fell into a deep crisis following a near-catastrophic accident in January 2024, that incident exposed hair-raising sloppiness at its factories and a key supplier.</div>
<div>Boeing's CEO Kelly Ortberg came out of retirement last year to help turn around the plane maker. But since taking over, Otberg has faced a debilitating strike by workers.</div>
<div>He has repaired the company's battered balance sheet with a fresh round of financing, but can Boeing overcome those issues at hand and deliver the record order from Qatar Air?</div>
<div>Boeing said the aircraft ordered by Qatar will be built into the next decade.</div>
<div>This deal is a major boost for Boeing amid the turbulence it has recently faced. Trump's involvement in sealing the agreement was widely seen as a symbolic endorsement of the company&rsquo;s return to dominance in the global aerospace sector.&nbsp;</div>
<h2><b>Defence, energy, and innovation drive deeper ties</b></h2>
<div>In addition to aviation, the visit saw major defence procurement agreements. A statement released by the White House stated that Raytheon, a subsidiary of RTX, secured a $1 billion deal to provide Qatar with its Fixed Site &ndash; Low, Slow, Small Unmanned Aerial System Integrated Defeat System (FS-LIDS), a cutting-edge counter-drone technology. This deal marks Qatar as the first international customer for the advanced system.</div>
<div>General Atomics also finalised a nearly $2 billion agreement to supply the MQ-9B remotely piloted aircraft system to the Qatari Armed Forces. These deals, signed at the government-to-government level, are aimed at enhancing regional deterrence and strengthening the US-Qatar partnership.</div>
<div>Qatar also committed to investing $1 billion into quantum technologies through a joint venture with Quantinuum and Al Rabban Capital. The initiative is expected to advance state-of-the-art computing and workforce development in both nations.</div>
<div>Meanwhile, McDermott and QatarEnergy are advancing $8.5 billion worth of energy infrastructure projects. Parsons Corp. secured 30 high-value projects in Qatar valued at up to $97 billion, further deepening the commercial relationship between the two nations.</div>
<div>Qatar has also pledged continued support for the US defence industrial base, including a statement of intent to invest $38 billion in security partnerships, infrastructure at Al Udeid Air Base, and additional capabilities in maritime and air defence.</div>
<h2><b>Diplomatic dimensions&nbsp;</b></h2>
<div>Trump&rsquo;s trip to Qatar was not without controversy. Domestically, critics raised alarms over reports that the US Department of Defense may accept a $400 million luxury Boeing jet from Qatar&mdash;dubbed a &ldquo;palace in the sky&rdquo;&mdash;for presidential use. Detractors, mainly Democrats, cited the US Constitution&rsquo;s Emoluments Clause, which bars federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval.</div>
<div>Trump defended the gesture online, calling the aircraft a &ldquo;gift, free of charge&rdquo; and asserting the transaction was &ldquo;public and transparent&rdquo;. Nonetheless, the issue has reignited debates over presidential ethics and foreign influence.</div>
<div>At a state dinner hosted by Qatar&rsquo;s Emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Trump appealed to Qatar to use its diplomatic leverage with Iran to advance nuclear negotiations. Citing Iran&rsquo;s enrichment of uranium up to 60 per cent&mdash;just below weapons-grade&mdash;Trump stressed the urgency of containing Tehran&rsquo;s nuclear ambitions and halting its support for proxy groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.</div>
<div>Al Thani responded in a televised interview, affirming Qatar&rsquo;s support for a nuclear-free Middle East while acknowledging Iran&rsquo;s right to pursue civilian nuclear power, provided it does not pose a regional threat.</div>
<h2><b>Broader economic strategy</b></h2>
<div>The Qatar visit is part of Trump&rsquo;s broader West Asia economic diplomacy tour, which began in Saudi Arabia. There, he announced $600 billion in investment commitments.&nbsp;</div>
<div>&ldquo;President Trump is securing billions in investments to revitalise American manufacturing,&rdquo; the White House said, pointing to the Qatar deals as evidence of his successful deal-making strategy.</div>
<div>Qatar&rsquo;s US investments reflect long-term bilateral cooperation, spanning sectors such as tourism, energy, information technology, healthcare, and financial services. The Gulf state invested $3.3 billion in the US in 2023 alone, with projects in advanced manufacturing and hospitality.</div>
<div>Trade between the two countries totalled $5.64 billion in 2024, with the US enjoying a $2 billion surplus. The US has had a positive trade balance with Qatar since 2003, and Qatar remains a top foreign military sales partner with active cases valued at over $26 billion.</div>
<div>The agreements are aligned with Qatar&rsquo;s Vision 2030, which aims to diversify the nation&rsquo;s economy and embrace advanced technologies. The deals also align with Trump&rsquo;s commitment to &lsquo;Made in America&rsquo;, bolstering the US industrial base and supporting high-paying jobs at home.</div>
<div>As Trump continues his West Asia tour, the impact of these historic deals will likely reverberate across sectors, from aerospace to defence and emerging tech&mdash;solidifying America&rsquo;s economic and strategic footprint in the Gulf for years to come.</div>
<div></div>

Business & Economy: The deals were signed during Trump’s visit to Qatar’s capital city, Doha, and are expected to generate over 1 million US jobs in the coming years.

US President Donald Trump has announced a series of landmark economic and defence deals with Qatar, with total agreements worth approximately $243.5 billion and setting the foundation for a broader $1.2 trillion economic commitment. The deals were signed during Trump’s visit to Qatar’s capital city, Doha—the second leg of his ongoing West Asia trip—and span aviation, energy, defence, quantum technology, and infrastructure, and are expected to generate over 1 million US jobs in the coming years. The centrepiece of the agreements is a $96 billion deal between Boeing, GE Aerospace, and Qatar Airways for the purchase of up to 210 widebody aircraft, marking Boeing’s largest-ever order for both the 787 Dreamliner and the 777X. The White House hailed the deal as a catalyst for “a new Golden Age” of American manufacturing and innovation, underlining Trump's signature "America First" economic diplomacy. Boeing’s record deal with Qatar Airways The aviation sector was at the forefront of Trump’s announcement, with Boeing and GE Aerospace finalising a $96 billion agreement with Qatar Airways to supply up to 210 aircraft—an unprecedented deal in both scale and significance. Qatar Airways CEO Badr Mohammed al-Meer called the deal “historic”, stating that the investment supports the airline’s mission to build the “cleanest, youngest, and most efficient fleet in global aviation.” The aircraft will be powered exclusively by GE Aerospace engines, adding to the strategic impact for US manufacturing. According to the White House, the agreement is projected to support 154,000 US jobs annually, amounting to over 1 million American jobs across the production and delivery lifecycle. While the US administration touted Qatar's orders as a record for Boeing jets, the firm's ability to deliver has come into question. Boeing is currently struggling to keep up with deliveries of the previous order. The firm fell into a deep crisis following a near-catastrophic accident in January 2024, that incident exposed hair-raising sloppiness at its factories and a key supplier. Boeing's CEO Kelly Ortberg came out of retirement last year to help turn around the plane maker. But since taking over, Otberg has faced a debilitating strike by workers. He has repaired the company's battered balance sheet with a fresh round of financing, but can Boeing overcome those issues at hand and deliver the record order from Qatar Air? Boeing said the aircraft ordered by Qatar will be built into the next decade. This deal is a major boost for Boeing amid the turbulence it has recently faced. Trump's involvement in sealing the agreement was widely seen as a symbolic endorsement of the company’s return to dominance in the global aerospace sector. Defence, energy, and innovation drive deeper ties In addition to aviation, the visit saw major defence procurement agreements. A statement released by the White House stated that Raytheon, a subsidiary of RTX, secured a $1 billion deal to provide Qatar with its Fixed Site – Low, Slow, Small Unmanned Aerial System Integrated Defeat System (FS-LIDS), a cutting-edge counter-drone technology. This deal marks Qatar as the first international customer for the advanced system. General Atomics also finalised a nearly $2 billion agreement to supply the MQ-9B remotely piloted aircraft system to the Qatari Armed Forces. These deals, signed at the government-to-government level, are aimed at enhancing regional deterrence and strengthening the US-Qatar partnership. Qatar also committed to investing $1 billion into quantum technologies through a joint venture with Quantinuum and Al Rabban Capital. The initiative is expected to advance state-of-the-art computing and workforce development in both nations. Meanwhile, McDermott and QatarEnergy are advancing $8.5 billion worth of energy infrastructure projects. Parsons Corp. secured 30 high-value projects in Qatar valued at up to $97 billion, further deepening the commercial relationship between the two nations. Qatar has also pledged continued support for the US defence industrial base, including a statement of intent to invest $38 billion in security partnerships, infrastructure at Al Udeid Air Base, and additional capabilities in maritime and air defence. Diplomatic dimensions Trump’s trip to Qatar was not without controversy. Domestically, critics raised alarms over reports that the US Department of Defense may accept a $400 million luxury Boeing jet from Qatar—dubbed a “palace in the sky”—for presidential use. Detractors, mainly Democrats, cited the US Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which bars federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval. Trump defended the gesture online, calling the aircraft a “gift, free of charge” and asserting the transaction was “public and transparent”. Nonetheless, the issue has reignited debates over presidential ethics and foreign influence. At a state dinner hosted by Qatar’s Emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Trump appealed to Qatar to use its diplomatic leverage with Iran to advance nuclear negotiations. Citing Iran’s enrichment of uranium up to 60 per cent—just below weapons-grade—Trump stressed the urgency of containing Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and halting its support for proxy groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. Al Thani responded in a televised interview, affirming Qatar’s support for a nuclear-free Middle East while acknowledging Iran’s right to pursue civilian nuclear power, provided it does not pose a regional threat. Broader economic strategy The Qatar visit is part of Trump’s broader West Asia economic diplomacy tour, which began in Saudi Arabia. There, he announced $600 billion in investment commitments. “President Trump is securing billions in investments to revitalise American manufacturing,” the White House said, pointing to the Qatar deals as evidence of his successful deal-making strategy. Qatar’s US investments reflect long-term bilateral cooperation, spanning sectors such as tourism, energy, information technology, healthcare, and financial services. The Gulf state invested $3.3 billion in the US in 2023 alone, with projects in advanced manufacturing and hospitality. Trade between the two countries totalled $5.64 billion in 2024, with the US enjoying a $2 billion surplus. The US has had a positive trade balance with Qatar since 2003, and Qatar remains a top foreign military sales partner with active cases valued at over $26 billion. The agreements are aligned with Qatar’s Vision 2030, which aims to diversify the nation’s economy and embrace advanced technologies. The deals also align with Trump’s commitment to ‘Made in America’, bolstering the US industrial base and supporting high-paying jobs at home. As Trump continues his West Asia tour, the impact of these historic deals will likely reverberate across sectors, from aerospace to defence and emerging tech—solidifying America’s economic and strategic footprint in the Gulf for years to come.

Trump’s Qatar visit: US inks deals worth more than $240 billion with Qatar, Boeing lands record deal

<div data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">In a dramatic shift in Middle Eastern geopolitics, US President Donald Trump has announced the lifting of economic sanctions on Syria following his unexpected meeting with the country&rsquo;s new interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former militant leader with links to al-Qaeda.</div>
<div data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody"></div>
<div data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">The decision marks a major turning point in the US-Syria relationship, which could have far-reaching consequences across the region.</div>
<h2><b>What happened in Syria?</b></h2>
<div>After over a decade of civil war and the near-total collapse of governance, President Bashar al-Assad&rsquo;s regime was toppled in December by Islamist militia Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). The group, once affiliated with al-Qaeda, staged a surprise advance into Damascus, forcing Assad and his family to flee to Russia.</div>
<div></div>
<div>HTS, now rebranded as a political movement, formed an interim government led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has attempted to present a moderate image and initiate the rebuilding of Syria. Street debates about democracy, governance, and civil liberties have emerged after decades of state repression.</div>
<div>However, Sharaa&rsquo;s administration is viewed with scepticism by many Syrians and global powers, due to the group&rsquo;s violent past. According to Human Rights Watch, HTS (previously the Nusra Front) was reportedly responsible for massacres of minority communities, including Alawites and Druze, during the conflict.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Sharaa now insists he is committed to safeguarding Syria&rsquo;s religious and ethnic diversity. &ldquo;There must be a legal framework that protects and ensures the rights of all,&rdquo; he told CNN.</div>
<h2><b>Why did Trump lift Syria sanctions?</b></h2>
<div>As per the Bloomberg report, Trump&rsquo;s decision came after weeks of lobbying from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, two of Sharaa&rsquo;s key regional backers. Meeting with Sharaa in Riyadh, Trump described him as a &ldquo;tough guy&rdquo; with &ldquo;potential&rdquo; and framed the move as giving Syria &ldquo;a chance at greatness.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Speaking at a major US-Saudi investment forum, Trump called the existing sanctions &ldquo;crippling&rdquo; and outdated. According to the White House summary, Trump urged Sharaa to normalise&nbsp;ties with Israel and &ldquo;expel all foreign terrorists&rdquo; from Syria.</div>
<div>Trump also criticised previous US administrations, claiming they were more interested in punishing leaders than negotiating change. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re not here to look into souls,&rdquo; he remarked. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re here to make deals.&rdquo;</div>
<h2><b>What were the US sanctions on Syria?</b></h2>
<div>US sanctions on Syria date back to 1979, when the country was designated a state sponsor of terrorism. The restrictions intensified after Syria&rsquo;s interference in Lebanon and support for Hezbollah.</div>
<div></div>
<div>In 2004, under President George W. Bush, the US further tightened sanctions, ending most exports to Syria. After Syria&rsquo;s brutal crackdown on Arab Spring protests in 2011, more sanctions followed under the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act, targeting Syrian government officials, businesses, and sectors linked to Assad&rsquo;s military campaign and human rights abuses.</div>
<div></div>
<div>According to the US Department of the Treasury, these sanctions froze assets, blocked US investments, and barred financial transactions, effectively cutting Syria off from the international banking system.</div>
<h2><b>How did sanctions affect the Syrian economy?</b></h2>
<div>Syria&rsquo;s economy was already bleeding from years of war. The World Bank downgraded it to low-income status in 2018. The country&rsquo;s GDP collapsed by over 50 per cent between 2010 and 2020, according to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP).</div>
<div></div>
<div>By 2023, over 90 per cent of Syrians lived in poverty, reports the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Access to fuel, medicine, electricity, and food was critically low. Public institutions barely functioned, and foreign investment dried up. Meanwhile, Syria&rsquo;s once-thriving agriculture sector&mdash;famed for olives and pistachios&mdash;was decimated.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Sanctions also indirectly boosted Syria&rsquo;s illicit economy. With trade routes blocked, the country turned into a regional hub for Captagon, a powerful, amphetamine-type drug, according to Europol and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).</div>
<div></div>
<div>By cutting Syria off from global financial institutions, sanctions hampered reconstruction and even aid operations. Humanitarian agencies complained of delays and operational costs rising due to restrictions on banking transactions, despite technical exemptions.</div>
<h2><b>What&rsquo;s next for US-Syria relations?</b></h2>
<div>Trump&rsquo;s face-to-face with Sharaa was the first US-Syria leader-level meeting in 25 years. It signals a dramatic shift in US policy, especially given Sharaa&rsquo;s militant past.</div>
<div></div>
<div>But it&rsquo;s also fraught with risks. HTS remains on the US Foreign Terrorist Organization list, and Sharaa&rsquo;s past includes links to al-Qaeda in Iraq and Syria. As recently as 2016, the US offered $10 million for his capture.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Critics fear Trump&rsquo;s engagement could legitimise extremist actors. But supporters argue this is a pragmatic step to stabilise the region, curb Iranian influence, and enable regional powers to shoulder Syria&rsquo;s reconstruction.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Whether lifting sanctions will bring lasting peace or empower a controversial leader remains uncertain. For now, Syrians are celebrating what many call their &ldquo;Liberation Day&rdquo; &mdash; hoping that relief from sanctions will translate into jobs, infrastructure, and dignity.</div>
<div></div>
<div>As the world watches, the road to Syria&rsquo;s recovery remains long, fragile, and deeply contested.</div>

Business & Economy: The move followed a landmark meeting with Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa during Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia.

In a dramatic shift in Middle Eastern geopolitics, US President Donald Trump has announced the lifting of economic sanctions on Syria following his unexpected meeting with the country’s new interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former militant leader with links to al-Qaeda. The decision marks a major turning point in the US-Syria relationship, which could have far-reaching consequences across the region. What happened in Syria? After over a decade of civil war and the near-total collapse of governance, President Bashar al-Assad’s regime was toppled in December by Islamist militia Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). The group, once affiliated with al-Qaeda, staged a surprise advance into Damascus, forcing Assad and his family to flee to Russia. HTS, now rebranded as a political movement, formed an interim government led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has attempted to present a moderate image and initiate the rebuilding of Syria. Street debates about democracy, governance, and civil liberties have emerged after decades of state repression. However, Sharaa’s administration is viewed with scepticism by many Syrians and global powers, due to the group’s violent past. According to Human Rights Watch, HTS (previously the Nusra Front) was reportedly responsible for massacres of minority communities, including Alawites and Druze, during the conflict. Sharaa now insists he is committed to safeguarding Syria’s religious and ethnic diversity. “There must be a legal framework that protects and ensures the rights of all,” he told CNN. Why did Trump lift Syria sanctions? As per the Bloomberg report, Trump’s decision came after weeks of lobbying from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, two of Sharaa’s key regional backers. Meeting with Sharaa in Riyadh, Trump described him as a “tough guy” with “potential” and framed the move as giving Syria “a chance at greatness.” Speaking at a major US-Saudi investment forum, Trump called the existing sanctions “crippling” and outdated. According to the White House summary, Trump urged Sharaa to normalise ties with Israel and “expel all foreign terrorists” from Syria. Trump also criticised previous US administrations, claiming they were more interested in punishing leaders than negotiating change. “We’re not here to look into souls,” he remarked. “We’re here to make deals.” What were the US sanctions on Syria? US sanctions on Syria date back to 1979, when the country was designated a state sponsor of terrorism. The restrictions intensified after Syria’s interference in Lebanon and support for Hezbollah. In 2004, under President George W. Bush, the US further tightened sanctions, ending most exports to Syria. After Syria’s brutal crackdown on Arab Spring protests in 2011, more sanctions followed under the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act, targeting Syrian government officials, businesses, and sectors linked to Assad’s military campaign and human rights abuses. According to the US Department of the Treasury, these sanctions froze assets, blocked US investments, and barred financial transactions, effectively cutting Syria off from the international banking system. How did sanctions affect the Syrian economy? Syria’s economy was already bleeding from years of war. The World Bank downgraded it to low-income status in 2018. The country’s GDP collapsed by over 50 per cent between 2010 and 2020, according to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). By 2023, over 90 per cent of Syrians lived in poverty, reports the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Access to fuel, medicine, electricity, and food was critically low. Public institutions barely functioned, and foreign investment dried up. Meanwhile, Syria’s once-thriving agriculture sector—famed for olives and pistachios—was decimated. Sanctions also indirectly boosted Syria’s illicit economy. With trade routes blocked, the country turned into a regional hub for Captagon, a powerful, amphetamine-type drug, according to Europol and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). By cutting Syria off from global financial institutions, sanctions hampered reconstruction and even aid operations. Humanitarian agencies complained of delays and operational costs rising due to restrictions on banking transactions, despite technical exemptions. What’s next for US-Syria relations? Trump’s face-to-face with Sharaa was the first US-Syria leader-level meeting in 25 years. It signals a dramatic shift in US policy, especially given Sharaa’s militant past. But it’s also fraught with risks. HTS remains on the US Foreign Terrorist Organization list, and Sharaa’s past includes links to al-Qaeda in Iraq and Syria. As recently as 2016, the US offered $10 million for his capture. Critics fear Trump’s engagement could legitimise extremist actors. But supporters argue this is a pragmatic step to stabilise the region, curb Iranian influence, and enable regional powers to shoulder Syria’s reconstruction. Whether lifting sanctions will bring lasting peace or empower a controversial leader remains uncertain. For now, Syrians are celebrating what many call their “Liberation Day” — hoping that relief from sanctions will translate into jobs, infrastructure, and dignity. As the world watches, the road to Syria’s recovery remains long, fragile, and deeply contested.

Trump lifts sanctions on Syria: What happened and what it means for the war-torn nation

The United States has officially scrapped the controversial AI diffusion rule that had previously limited the export of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips. Watch to know more!

Trump administration reverses Biden's AI export controls

<p><span>Indian authorities have uncovered a sophisticated luxury car smuggling racket involving the undervaluation of high-end vehicles to evade customs duties, leading to losses exceeding ₹25 crore ($2.9 million).</span></p>
<p><span>The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) revealed that over 30 luxury vehicles were imported into India by misdeclaring their value using falsified documents.</span></p>
<p><span>According to the finance ministry, the imported vehicles included premium models such as the Rolls-Royce, Hummer EV, Cadillac Escalade, Lexus, Toyota Land Cruiser, and Lincoln Navigator.</span></p>
<p><span>These cars were initially shipped from the United States and Japan to intermediary locations like Dubai and Sri Lanka, where they underwent conversions from left-hand drive to right-hand drive&mdash;a requirement for Indian roads.</span></p>
<p><span>Once modified, the cars were imported into India at significantly undervalued prices, sometimes by as much as 50%, enabling importers to evade substantial customs duties. Investigators found that fabricated invoices and other documents were used to support the false declarations at Indian ports.</span></p>
<h2><span><strong>Nationwide operation and investigation</strong></span></h2>
<p><span>The DRI has already arrested a Hyderabad-based importer, identified as one of the key players in the scam. He is accused of importing at least eight such vehicles, resulting in an estimated ₹7 crore ($820,616) in customs duty evasion. He has been remanded to judicial custody by the Chief Judicial Magistrate&rsquo;s Court in Ahmedabad.</span></p>
<p><span>The smuggling ring is believed to involve importers operating across major Indian cities, including Mumbai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Bangalore, and Delhi. Several other importers and individuals who were the end-users of these luxury vehicles are currently under the DRI&rsquo;s scanner.</span></p>
<p><span>It is speculated that the operation exploited regulatory loopholes in India&rsquo;s high-duty import structure by using third-country routing and sophisticated documentation fraud. Authorities are intensifying scrutiny of similar vehicle imports to detect any further evasion.</span></p>
<p><span>The crackdown comes as the Indian government continues efforts to strengthen customs enforcement and close gaps in import regulations. The DRI is expected to pursue further legal action against those involved and recover the evaded duties.</span></p>
<p><span>This case highlights the increasing sophistication of customs fraud in high-value segments and the critical role of inter-agency intelligence in disrupting such operations.</span></p>
<p><span>(<em>With inputs from agencies</em>)</span></p>

Business & Economy: The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) revealed that over 30 luxury vehicles were imported into India by misdeclaring their value.

Indian authorities have uncovered a sophisticated luxury car smuggling racket involving the undervaluation of high-end vehicles to evade customs duties, leading to losses exceeding ₹25 crore ($2.9 million). The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) revealed that over 30 luxury vehicles were imported into India by misdeclaring their value using falsified documents. According to the finance ministry, the imported vehicles included premium models such as the Rolls-Royce, Hummer EV, Cadillac Escalade, Lexus, Toyota Land Cruiser, and Lincoln Navigator. These cars were initially shipped from the United States and Japan to intermediary locations like Dubai and Sri Lanka, where they underwent conversions from left-hand drive to right-hand drive—a requirement for Indian roads. Once modified, the cars were imported into India at significantly undervalued prices, sometimes by as much as 50%, enabling importers to evade substantial customs duties. Investigators found that fabricated invoices and other documents were used to support the false declarations at Indian ports. Nationwide operation and investigation The DRI has already arrested a Hyderabad-based importer, identified as one of the key players in the scam. He is accused of importing at least eight such vehicles, resulting in an estimated ₹7 crore ($820,616) in customs duty evasion. He has been remanded to judicial custody by the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court in Ahmedabad. The smuggling ring is believed to involve importers operating across major Indian cities, including Mumbai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Bangalore, and Delhi. Several other importers and individuals who were the end-users of these luxury vehicles are currently under the DRI’s scanner. It is speculated that the operation exploited regulatory loopholes in India’s high-duty import structure by using third-country routing and sophisticated documentation fraud. Authorities are intensifying scrutiny of similar vehicle imports to detect any further evasion. The crackdown comes as the Indian government continues efforts to strengthen customs enforcement and close gaps in import regulations. The DRI is expected to pursue further legal action against those involved and recover the evaded duties. This case highlights the increasing sophistication of customs fraud in high-value segments and the critical role of inter-agency intelligence in disrupting such operations. (With inputs from agencies)

Indian officials busts luxury car import scam; Rs 25 crore tax evasion uncovered

<p>Day after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave a bold message to Pakistan, defining "Laxman Rekha' against terrorism, the shares of Dassault Aviation, maker of Rafale jets that India reportedly used in <a href="https://www.wionews.com/tags/operation-sindoor">Operation Sindoor</a>, extended a substantial uprise for a second straight session on Wednesday (May 14).&nbsp;</p>
<p>The shares of Dassault Aviation, a French Aircraft business company, rallied up to 1.47 per cent to hit an intraday high of EUR 304.40 % on the Paris Stock Exchange, edging closer to its record high of EUR 332.20.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The shares jumped after the Indian Air Force launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, a precision strike aimed at terrorist infrastructures in Pakistan, after the deadly Pahalgam terror attack, that claimed the lives of 26 people.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/operation-sindoor-this-tech-firm-is-powering-the-pinpoint-precision-of-rafale-fighter-jets-all-about-thales-9061652">Operation Sindoor: This tech firm is powering the pinpoint precision of Rafale fighter jets! All about Thales</a></strong></p>
<p>According to reports, Rafale fighter jets, equipped with SCALP cruise missiles and HAMMER munities, carried out the strikes with precision.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The shares dropped 7 per cent on Monday, but rebounded by more than 3 per cent on Tuesday.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Dassault Aviation reported &euro;6.24 billion in annual revenue and a net profit of &euro;924 million, while the broader French Aerospace &amp; Defence sector grew 17.7% over the past year.</p>
<p><strong>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/operation-sindoor-top-5-sensors-behind-rafale-jets-cutting-edge-performance-9060955">Operation Sindoor: Top 5 sensors behind Rafale jet&rsquo;s cutting-edge performance</a></strong></p>
<p>The stocks further rebounded after PM Modi sent a bold message to Pakistan, with an S-400 missile defence system in the background, from Adampur Airbase.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Modi lauded the Indian Armed Forces as he travelled to the Adampur Airbase in Punjab and interacted with Air Force personnel. PM Modi stressed that the Indian Armed Forces attacked the terrorists from the front and killed them.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The speech by PM Modi has another big significance as he addressed the IAF jawans at the Adampur base, which is located merely 100 km from the Pakistani border, which Pakistan claimed to have destroyed. PM Modi rubbished the lie made by Pakistan as he shared images from his visit.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/operation-sindoor-how-the-mirage-2000s-flaws-helped-dassault-build-the-rafale-fighter-jet-9060812">Operation Sindoor: How the Mirage 2000&rsquo;s flaws helped Dassault build the Rafale fighter jet</a></strong></p>

The shares jumped after the Indian Air Force launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, a precision strike aimed at terrorist infrastructures in Pakistan. India news pakistan

Day after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave a bold message to Pakistan, defining "Laxman Rekha' against terrorism, the shares of Dassault Aviation, maker of Rafale jets that India reportedly used in Operation Sindoor, extended a substantial uprise for a second straight session on Wednesday (May 14). The shares of Dassault Aviation, a French Aircraft business company, rallied up to 1.47 per cent to hit an intraday high of EUR 304.40 % on the Paris Stock Exchange, edging closer to its record high of EUR 332.20. The shares jumped after the Indian Air Force launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, a precision strike aimed at terrorist infrastructures in Pakistan, after the deadly Pahalgam terror attack, that claimed the lives of 26 people. Also read: Operation Sindoor: This tech firm is powering the pinpoint precision of Rafale fighter jets! All about Thales According to reports, Rafale fighter jets, equipped with SCALP cruise missiles and HAMMER munities, carried out the strikes with precision. The shares dropped 7 per cent on Monday, but rebounded by more than 3 per cent on Tuesday. Dassault Aviation reported €6.24 billion in annual revenue and a net profit of €924 million, while the broader French Aerospace & Defence sector grew 17.7% over the past year. Also read: Operation Sindoor: Top 5 sensors behind Rafale jet’s cutting-edge performance The stocks further rebounded after PM Modi sent a bold message to Pakistan, with an S-400 missile defence system in the background, from Adampur Airbase. Modi lauded the Indian Armed Forces as he travelled to the Adampur Airbase in Punjab and interacted with Air Force personnel. PM Modi stressed that the Indian Armed Forces attacked the terrorists from the front and killed them. The speech by PM Modi has another big significance as he addressed the IAF jawans at the Adampur base, which is located merely 100 km from the Pakistani border, which Pakistan claimed to have destroyed. PM Modi rubbished the lie made by Pakistan as he shared images from his visit. Also read: Operation Sindoor: How the Mirage 2000’s flaws helped Dassault build the Rafale fighter jet

Rafale maker Dassault Aviation stock upswings after PM Modi's stern message to Pakistan with S-400 in backdrop

<p><span>In a dramatic shift that could redefine global access to artificial intelligence (AI) hardware, the United States has formally scrapped an export control measure known as the &ldquo;AI diffusion rule&rdquo;.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>The decision made by the Trump administration paves the way for allied nations such as India and Saudi Arabia to access cutting-edge American AI chips without facing the quotas and restrictions proposed under the previous administration.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>The move is seen as a strategic recalibration in Washington&rsquo;s approach to AI governance&mdash;one that seeks to bolster partnerships, protect US innovation, and isolate adversaries like China without alienating friendly nations.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span><strong>Policy reversal</strong></span></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>In the AI diffusion rule, issued on January 15, 2025, with compliance requirements that were set to come into effect on May 15, 2022, the Biden administration had proposed a tiered framework for the export of advanced computing semiconductors.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Designed to curb the indirect flow of chips to China through third-party countries, the rule categorised global nations into three tiers. While tier-one allies like Japan and South Korea faced minimal constraints, tier-two countries such as India, Mexico, and Portugal were subject to chip quotas. Nations deemed adversarial faced outright bans.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Though the policy never officially took effect, it had already sparked concern among governments and tech firms globally. Critics warned that the sweeping nature of the rule risked damaging diplomatic relationships, stifling AI development in friendly nations, and pushing them toward rival suppliers, including Chinese chipmakers.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>According to a Reuters report, David Sacks, the newly appointed White House AI and crypto head, confirmed the reversal while addressing the Saudi-US Investment Forum in Riyadh. &ldquo;The Trump administration has just announced that we will be rescinding what&rsquo;s known as the Biden diffusion rule,&rdquo; Sacks said. &ldquo;It literally restricted the diffusion or proliferation of American technology all over the world.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Sacks emphasised that the intention was never to alienate allies like Saudi Arabia or India and that the policy had been widely misunderstood. &ldquo;Diffusion is not a risk with a friend like Saudi Arabia,&rdquo; he added, noting that the administration would now pursue a more inclusive, trust-based export framework.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span><strong>Strengthening alliances</strong></span></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Commerce Under Secretary Jeffrey Kessler echoed Sacks&rsquo; sentiments, characterising the previous rule as "ill-conceived and counterproductive". He outlined the new administration's philosophy: to foster innovation and deepen technology partnerships with like-minded nations.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>&ldquo;We reject the Biden Administration's attempt to impose its own ill-conceived and counterproductive AI policies on the American people,&rdquo; Kessler said. &ldquo;The Trump Administration will pursue a bold, inclusive strategy to share American AI technology with trusted foreign countries around the world while keeping the technology out of the hands of our adversaries.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>The revised approach has already started reshaping the global AI supply chain. In a major development, Nvidia recently signed a deal with Saudi Arabia&rsquo;s AI startup Humain, backed by the country&rsquo;s sovereign wealth fund. As part of the agreement, 18,000 of Nvidia&rsquo;s latest Blackwell GB300 chips will be delivered to Saudi Arabia to power a planned 500-megawatt data centre&mdash;a significant boost to the country's ambitions to become a global AI hub.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>India, another country expected to benefit significantly from the rollback, has been aggressively ramping up its AI infrastructure. While no formal deal has yet been announced, analysts believe the softened stance will unlock new opportunities for technology transfer and chip access, particularly for Indian startups and public initiatives seeking to leapfrog in the AI race.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span><strong>Balancing security and growth</strong></span></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>The Biden-era rule was part of a broader four-year effort to limit China&rsquo;s access to dual-use technologies that could enhance its military capabilities. It aimed to prevent backdoor channels by which American chips could end up in adversarial hands through transshipment or third-party nations.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>While that core objective remains unchanged under the Trump administration, officials say the new framework will rely more on targeted enforcement and less on blanket rules. The Commerce Department reiterated that export restrictions remain in place for China and other countries of concern. It specifically warned against the use of US-origin chips for training Chinese AI models or integrating them with Huawei&rsquo;s advanced Ascend processors.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>This approach seeks to balance the dual imperatives of national security and technological leadership. By allowing trusted nations greater access to US semiconductors, Washington hopes to maintain its dominance in AI development while reducing the incentive for global players to turn to Chinese alternatives.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>As the AI arms race heats up, the Trump administration's decision to scrap the diffusion rule may offer a crucial edge&mdash;enabling US chipmakers to build deeper ties with foreign partners and secure strategic footholds in fast-growing regions.</span></p>

Business & Economy: The decision paves way for allied nations like India and Saudi Arabia to access cutting-edge American AI chips without facing quotas and restrictions

In a dramatic shift that could redefine global access to artificial intelligence (AI) hardware, the United States has formally scrapped an export control measure known as the “AI diffusion rule”. The decision made by the Trump administration paves the way for allied nations such as India and Saudi Arabia to access cutting-edge American AI chips without facing the quotas and restrictions proposed under the previous administration. The move is seen as a strategic recalibration in Washington’s approach to AI governance—one that seeks to bolster partnerships, protect US innovation, and isolate adversaries like China without alienating friendly nations. Policy reversal In the AI diffusion rule, issued on January 15, 2025, with compliance requirements that were set to come into effect on May 15, 2022, the Biden administration had proposed a tiered framework for the export of advanced computing semiconductors. Designed to curb the indirect flow of chips to China through third-party countries, the rule categorised global nations into three tiers. While tier-one allies like Japan and South Korea faced minimal constraints, tier-two countries such as India, Mexico, and Portugal were subject to chip quotas. Nations deemed adversarial faced outright bans. Though the policy never officially took effect, it had already sparked concern among governments and tech firms globally. Critics warned that the sweeping nature of the rule risked damaging diplomatic relationships, stifling AI development in friendly nations, and pushing them toward rival suppliers, including Chinese chipmakers. According to a Reuters report, David Sacks, the newly appointed White House AI and crypto head, confirmed the reversal while addressing the Saudi-US Investment Forum in Riyadh. “The Trump administration has just announced that we will be rescinding what’s known as the Biden diffusion rule,” Sacks said. “It literally restricted the diffusion or proliferation of American technology all over the world.” Sacks emphasised that the intention was never to alienate allies like Saudi Arabia or India and that the policy had been widely misunderstood. “Diffusion is not a risk with a friend like Saudi Arabia,” he added, noting that the administration would now pursue a more inclusive, trust-based export framework. Strengthening alliances Commerce Under Secretary Jeffrey Kessler echoed Sacks’ sentiments, characterising the previous rule as "ill-conceived and counterproductive". He outlined the new administration's philosophy: to foster innovation and deepen technology partnerships with like-minded nations. “We reject the Biden Administration's attempt to impose its own ill-conceived and counterproductive AI policies on the American people,” Kessler said. “The Trump Administration will pursue a bold, inclusive strategy to share American AI technology with trusted foreign countries around the world while keeping the technology out of the hands of our adversaries.” The revised approach has already started reshaping the global AI supply chain. In a major development, Nvidia recently signed a deal with Saudi Arabia’s AI startup Humain, backed by the country’s sovereign wealth fund. As part of the agreement, 18,000 of Nvidia’s latest Blackwell GB300 chips will be delivered to Saudi Arabia to power a planned 500-megawatt data centre—a significant boost to the country's ambitions to become a global AI hub. India, another country expected to benefit significantly from the rollback, has been aggressively ramping up its AI infrastructure. While no formal deal has yet been announced, analysts believe the softened stance will unlock new opportunities for technology transfer and chip access, particularly for Indian startups and public initiatives seeking to leapfrog in the AI race. Balancing security and growth The Biden-era rule was part of a broader four-year effort to limit China’s access to dual-use technologies that could enhance its military capabilities. It aimed to prevent backdoor channels by which American chips could end up in adversarial hands through transshipment or third-party nations. While that core objective remains unchanged under the Trump administration, officials say the new framework will rely more on targeted enforcement and less on blanket rules. The Commerce Department reiterated that export restrictions remain in place for China and other countries of concern. It specifically warned against the use of US-origin chips for training Chinese AI models or integrating them with Huawei’s advanced Ascend processors. This approach seeks to balance the dual imperatives of national security and technological leadership. By allowing trusted nations greater access to US semiconductors, Washington hopes to maintain its dominance in AI development while reducing the incentive for global players to turn to Chinese alternatives. As the AI arms race heats up, the Trump administration's decision to scrap the diffusion rule may offer a crucial edge—enabling US chipmakers to build deeper ties with foreign partners and secure strategic footholds in fast-growing regions.

US rescinds Biden-era AI chip export curbs, opening doors for allies

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN;">Luxury brand Burberry has warned it employees that it may shed 1700 jobs globally by 2027. The move is part of the brand&rsquo;s effort to cost cut in order to turn around the business.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN;">The company, which hired former Coach and Jimmy Choo chief executive Joshua Schulman last July to revive its fortunes, disclosed the plan as part of a push to generate an additional 79 mn USD of savings by 2027.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN;">It came as Burberry reported a 17 per cent fall in revenue to &pound;2.5bn for the 12 months to March 29. It made an operating loss of 49 million USD compared with a 557.2159 USD profit the year before.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="gh-archive-page-post-title"><a class="gh-archive-page-post-title-link" href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/bollywood/why-diljit-dosanjh-wasnt-allowed-to-wear-25-billion-maharaja-of-patiala-necklace-at-met-gala-9041586" aria-label="Why Diljit Dosanjh wasn&rsquo;t allowed to wear $2.5 billion &lsquo;Maharaja of Patiala&rsquo; necklace at Met Gala">Why Diljit Dosanjh wasn&rsquo;t allowed to wear $2.5 billion &lsquo;Maharaja of Patiala&rsquo; necklace at Met Gala</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN;"><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/second-biggest-layoff-by-microsoft-cutting-6000-globally-9066366">Second biggest layoff by Microsoft cutting 6,000 jobs globally</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN;">While the company&rsquo;s cost cutting drive may help the company&rsquo;s business, it will affect the brand&rsquo;s major workforce and reduce it to one fifth. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN;">The company said the &ldquo;organisational changes&rdquo; were meant to ensure Burberry was &ldquo;fit for the future&rdquo;.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN;"><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-london-fashion-week-designer-daniel-lee-gives-burberrys-trench-coat-a-streetwear-edge-759257">London Fashion Week: Designer Daniel Lee gives Burberry's trench coat a streetwear edge</a></span></p>

Luxury brand Burberry has warned it employees that it may shed 1700 jobs globally by 2027. The move is part of the brand’s effort to cost cut in order to turn around the business.  Business & Economy | Lifestyle

Luxury brand Burberry has warned it employees that it may shed 1700 jobs globally by 2027. The move is part of the brand’s effort to cost cut in order to turn around the business. The company, which hired former Coach and Jimmy Choo chief executive Joshua Schulman last July to revive its fortunes, disclosed the plan as part of a push to generate an additional 79 mn USD of savings by 2027. It came as Burberry reported a 17 per cent fall in revenue to £2.5bn for the 12 months to March 29. It made an operating loss of 49 million USD compared with a 557.2159 USD profit the year before. Why Diljit Dosanjh wasn’t allowed to wear $2.5 billion ‘Maharaja of Patiala’ necklace at Met Gala Second biggest layoff by Microsoft cutting 6,000 jobs globally While the company’s cost cutting drive may help the company’s business, it will affect the brand’s major workforce and reduce it to one fifth. The company said the “organisational changes” were meant to ensure Burberry was “fit for the future”. London Fashion Week: Designer Daniel Lee gives Burberry's trench coat a streetwear edge

Too costly to keep up? Luxury brand Burberry may shed 1700 employees in major cost cutting drive

<p dir="ltr"><span>The US Treasury Department on Tuesday imposed sweeping sanctions on more than 20 companies accused of operating within a vast international network that facilitates the shipment of Iranian crude oil worth billions of dollars to China.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The move is part of the Trump administration&rsquo;s ongoing &ldquo;maximum pressure&rdquo; campaign aimed at curbing Iran&rsquo;s oil revenues and deterring its military and nuclear ambitions.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The sanctioned network is allegedly tied to Iran&rsquo;s Armed Forces General Staff (AFGS) and its front company, Sepehr Energy Jahan Nama Pars Company, which the US says uses complex smuggling tactics involving front companies, fake documentation, and shadow fleet tankers to evade sanctions and funnel money into Iran&rsquo;s defence and missile programs, as well as support for terrorist groups across the region.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>Oil revenue linked to weapons development</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>According to the Treasury&rsquo;s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the sanctioned entities operate in multiple jurisdictions, including Hong Kong, Singapore, China, and the Seychelles. The network includes companies such as CCIC Singapore PTE Ltd, Huangdao Inspection and Certification Co. Ltd, and Qingdao Linkrich International Shipping Agency Co. Ltd, all of which played roles in masking the Iranian origin of crude shipments and facilitating their delivery to China&rsquo;s independent &ldquo;teapot&rdquo; refineries.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>OFAC said revenue from these sales directly funds Iran&rsquo;s development of ballistic missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and nuclear proliferation activities, as well as attacks by the Houthi group on commercial vessels in the Red Sea and against US and Israeli interests.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Reuters reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, &ldquo;This action underscores our continued focus on intensifying pressure on every aspect of Iran&rsquo;s oil trade&rdquo;.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>&ldquo;We will continue targeting this primary source of revenue so long as the regime supports terrorism and proliferation of deadly weapons,&rdquo; he added.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>US warns of further measures amid fragile diplomacy</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The sanctions come just days after the conclusion of a fourth round of nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington. While both countries have expressed a preference for a diplomatic resolution to the decades-long nuclear standoff, deep disagreements remain over key issues such as uranium enrichment levels.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>US President Donald Trump, speaking at a US-Saudi investment conference, offered Iran &ldquo;a new and better path&rdquo; but warned that rejection would be met with even harsher measures, including driving Iranian oil exports &ldquo;to zero&rdquo;.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>This latest round of sanctions also targets ships, shadow fleet tankers like BALU and ROC, and financial facilitators involved in laundering proceeds back to the AFGS. US officials have signalled that unless China&rsquo;s state-owned enterprises are brought into the sanctions regime, the measures may have limited long-term impact.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Meanwhile, Beijing has criticised the US for what it calls &ldquo;long-arm jurisdiction&rdquo; that undermines international trade, reaffirming its opposition to unilateral sanctions.</span></p>

Business & Economy: The move is part of the Trump administration’s maximum pressure campaign aimed at curbing Iran’s oil revenues and deterring its military ambitions

The US Treasury Department on Tuesday imposed sweeping sanctions on more than 20 companies accused of operating within a vast international network that facilitates the shipment of Iranian crude oil worth billions of dollars to China. The move is part of the Trump administration’s ongoing “maximum pressure” campaign aimed at curbing Iran’s oil revenues and deterring its military and nuclear ambitions. The sanctioned network is allegedly tied to Iran’s Armed Forces General Staff (AFGS) and its front company, Sepehr Energy Jahan Nama Pars Company, which the US says uses complex smuggling tactics involving front companies, fake documentation, and shadow fleet tankers to evade sanctions and funnel money into Iran’s defence and missile programs, as well as support for terrorist groups across the region. Oil revenue linked to weapons development According to the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the sanctioned entities operate in multiple jurisdictions, including Hong Kong, Singapore, China, and the Seychelles. The network includes companies such as CCIC Singapore PTE Ltd, Huangdao Inspection and Certification Co. Ltd, and Qingdao Linkrich International Shipping Agency Co. Ltd, all of which played roles in masking the Iranian origin of crude shipments and facilitating their delivery to China’s independent “teapot” refineries. OFAC said revenue from these sales directly funds Iran’s development of ballistic missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and nuclear proliferation activities, as well as attacks by the Houthi group on commercial vessels in the Red Sea and against US and Israeli interests. Reuters reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, “This action underscores our continued focus on intensifying pressure on every aspect of Iran’s oil trade”. “We will continue targeting this primary source of revenue so long as the regime supports terrorism and proliferation of deadly weapons,” he added. US warns of further measures amid fragile diplomacy The sanctions come just days after the conclusion of a fourth round of nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington. While both countries have expressed a preference for a diplomatic resolution to the decades-long nuclear standoff, deep disagreements remain over key issues such as uranium enrichment levels. US President Donald Trump, speaking at a US-Saudi investment conference, offered Iran “a new and better path” but warned that rejection would be met with even harsher measures, including driving Iranian oil exports “to zero”. This latest round of sanctions also targets ships, shadow fleet tankers like BALU and ROC, and financial facilitators involved in laundering proceeds back to the AFGS. US officials have signalled that unless China’s state-owned enterprises are brought into the sanctions regime, the measures may have limited long-term impact. Meanwhile, Beijing has criticised the US for what it calls “long-arm jurisdiction” that undermines international trade, reaffirming its opposition to unilateral sanctions.

US sanctions over 20 companies for facilitating Iranian oil shipments to China

<p dir="ltr"><span>India&rsquo;s retail inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), eased to 3.16 per cent in April, from 3.34 per cent in March. It is the lowest year-on-year inflation since July 2019, according to data released by the Ministry of Statistics &amp; Programme Implementation on May 13.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The moderation in inflation was primarily driven by a significant decline in food prices. Food inflation fell sharply to 1.78 per cent in April from 2.69 per cent in March&mdash;a decline of 91 basis points. This is the lowest level of food inflation recorded since October 2021.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The steep decline is attributed to lower inflation in vegetables, pulses, fruits, meat and fish, personal care items, and cereals.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Rural inflation slowed more sharply, falling to 2.92 per cent in April from 3.25 per cent in March. Rural food inflation dropped to 1.85 per cent from 2.82 per cent. In urban areas, inflation dipped to 3.36 per cent from 3.43 per cent, while urban food inflation saw a more pronounced decline to 1.64 per cent from 2.48 per cent in March.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Kerala witnessed the highest inflation at 5.94 per cent year-on-year, followed by Karnataka (4.26 per cent), Jammu &amp; Kashmir (4.25 per cent) and Punjab (4.09 per cent), while Telangana and Delhi saw the lowest inflation at 1.26 per cent and 1.77 per cent, respectively.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Among key components, housing inflation remained stable at 3.00 per cent compared to 3.03 per cent in March, while education inflation ticked up to 4.13 per cent from 3.98 per cent. Health inflation remained flat at 4.25 per cent.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>But notably, fuel and light inflation advanced to 2.92 per cent, from 1.42 per cent the previous month. Transport and communication inflation rose to 3.73 per cent from 3.36 per cent.</span></p>
<h2 dir="ltr"><span>RBI&rsquo;s target holds steady</span></h2>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The Reserve Bank of India, which has been mandated to ensure inflation remains at 4 per cent with a margin of 2 per cent on either side, has cut the key interest rate by 50 basis points in two tranches (February and April) to 6 per cent underpinned by easing inflation.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The central bank has projected the CPI inflation for the financial year 2025-26 at 4 per cent, with Q1 at 3.6 per cent, Q2 at 3.9 per cent, Q3 at 3.8 per cent, and Q4 at 4.4 per cent.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>With inflation trends remaining well within the target range, market expectations for a potential rate cut in the upcoming meeting of RBI&rsquo;s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) in June have strengthened.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

Business & Economy: The moderation in inflation was primarily driven by a decline in food prices. Food inflation fell to 1.78 per cent, the lowest since October 2021.

India’s retail inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), eased to 3.16 per cent in April, from 3.34 per cent in March. It is the lowest year-on-year inflation since July 2019, according to data released by the Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation on May 13. The moderation in inflation was primarily driven by a significant decline in food prices. Food inflation fell sharply to 1.78 per cent in April from 2.69 per cent in March—a decline of 91 basis points. This is the lowest level of food inflation recorded since October 2021. The steep decline is attributed to lower inflation in vegetables, pulses, fruits, meat and fish, personal care items, and cereals. Rural inflation slowed more sharply, falling to 2.92 per cent in April from 3.25 per cent in March. Rural food inflation dropped to 1.85 per cent from 2.82 per cent. In urban areas, inflation dipped to 3.36 per cent from 3.43 per cent, while urban food inflation saw a more pronounced decline to 1.64 per cent from 2.48 per cent in March. Kerala witnessed the highest inflation at 5.94 per cent year-on-year, followed by Karnataka (4.26 per cent), Jammu & Kashmir (4.25 per cent) and Punjab (4.09 per cent), while Telangana and Delhi saw the lowest inflation at 1.26 per cent and 1.77 per cent, respectively. Among key components, housing inflation remained stable at 3.00 per cent compared to 3.03 per cent in March, while education inflation ticked up to 4.13 per cent from 3.98 per cent. Health inflation remained flat at 4.25 per cent. But notably, fuel and light inflation advanced to 2.92 per cent, from 1.42 per cent the previous month. Transport and communication inflation rose to 3.73 per cent from 3.36 per cent. RBI’s target holds steady The Reserve Bank of India, which has been mandated to ensure inflation remains at 4 per cent with a margin of 2 per cent on either side, has cut the key interest rate by 50 basis points in two tranches (February and April) to 6 per cent underpinned by easing inflation. The central bank has projected the CPI inflation for the financial year 2025-26 at 4 per cent, with Q1 at 3.6 per cent, Q2 at 3.9 per cent, Q3 at 3.8 per cent, and Q4 at 4.4 per cent. With inflation trends remaining well within the target range, market expectations for a potential rate cut in the upcoming meeting of RBI’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) in June have strengthened.

India’s retail inflation hits a 6-year low as food prices cool

India's export growth may face a serious challenge after the new US-China tariff deal. As China regains trade favor with the US, India risks losing its short-term trade advantage.

US-China tariff deal threatens India’s recent export gains