National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

Vivek Ramaswamy, the Indian-origin US politician, has become one of the richest people in America as his net worth has increased to $1.8 billion. It's an 80 per cent increase in just nine months. This comes amid his bid for Ohio governor, which he announced in February.&nbsp;In 2024, Ramaswamy ran for US presidency but withdrew his bid and supported Donald Trump. In March, Forbes estimated his net worth at just about $1 billion, barely making the World Billionaires List.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/japan-scrambles-aircraft-after-chinese-drone-detected-off-island-near-taiwan-amid-diplomatic-tensions-details-here-1764070760725">Japan ‘scrambles aircraft’ after ‘Chinese’ drone detected off island near Taiwan amid diplomatic tensions. Details here</a>&nbsp;Is the money from politics?&nbsp;It's quick to assume that the reason behind this jump in wealth might be because of his rising political career. But as per a Forbes report, it's because of his old pharmaceutical company, Roivant Sciences.&nbsp;The 39-year-old Republican launched the company in 2014, the year he made Forbes' 30 Under 30 list. A spokesperson from his team confirmed that the Forbes numbers as "broadly correct".&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zelensky-thanks-13-world-leaders-on-internet-after-trump-accused-him-of-showing-zero-gratitude-for-efforts-to-end-war-with-russia-1764014092322">Zelensky thanks 13 world leaders on internet after Trump accused him of showing ‘zero gratitude’ for efforts to end war with Russia</a>&nbsp;Bloomberg reported in April that the company raised $75 million in Series D funding at a $1.5 billion valuation, and a person familiar with the company says Ramaswamy's stake is worth about $100 million, or 6.7 per cent.&nbsp;&nbsp;Ramaswamy became the chairman of Roivant in 2021, and the company went public soon after. In early 2023, he left the board to focus on his presidential run. But he still was the owner of tens of millions of shares.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-pakistan-borders-may-change-defence-minister-rajnath-singh-says-sindh-may-return-to-india-after-1947-s-partition-details-here-1763906027937">India-Pakistan borders 'may change': Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says 'Sindh may return to India' after 1947's partition. Details here</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;

In 2024, Ramaswamy ran for US presidency but withdrew his bid and supported Donald Trump. In March, Forbes estimated his net worth at just about $1 billion, barely making the World Billionaires List.



Vivek Ramaswamy, the Indian-origin US politician, has become one of the richest people in America as his net worth has increased to $1.8 billion. It's an 80 per cent increase in just nine months. This comes amid his bid for Ohio governor, which he announced in February. In 2024, Ramaswamy ran for US presidency but withdrew his bid and supported Donald Trump. In March, Forbes estimated his net worth at just about $1 billion, barely making the World Billionaires List. Also read: Japan ‘scrambles aircraft’ after ‘Chinese’ drone detected off island near Taiwan amid diplomatic tensions. Details here Is the money from politics? It's quick to assume that the reason behind this jump in wealth might be because of his rising political career. But as per a Forbes report, it's because of his old pharmaceutical company, Roivant Sciences. The 39-year-old Republican launched the company in 2014, the year he made Forbes' 30 Under 30 list. A spokesperson from his team confirmed that the Forbes numbers as "broadly correct". Also read: Zelensky thanks 13 world leaders on internet after Trump accused him of showing ‘zero gratitude’ for efforts to end war with Russia Bloomberg reported in April that the company raised $75 million in Series D funding at a $1.5 billion valuation, and a person familiar with the company says Ramaswamy's stake is worth about $100 million, or 6.7 per cent. Ramaswamy became the chairman of Roivant in 2021, and the company went public soon after. In early 2023, he left the board to focus on his presidential run. But he still was the owner of tens of millions of shares. Also read: India-Pakistan borders 'may change': Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says 'Sindh may return to India' after 1947's partition. Details here

In 2024, Ramaswamy ran for US presidency but withdrew his bid and supported Donald Trump. In March, Forbes estimated his net worth at just about $1 billion, barely making the World Billionaires List.&nbsp;

Vivek Ramaswamy’s wealth doubles in 9 months, reaching $1.8bn. Here’s how. Hint: It’s not from politics

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that she has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) while serving under President Donald Trump. She has said that the cause of this situation is the demanding schedule that has led her to spend extended periods away from her family, as she explained to The Daily Mail.&nbsp;“Honestly, I have PTSD about making plans, so I just don't,” the 28-year-old told the publication regarding the challenges of coordinating time off with her husband, 60-year-old real estate developer Nicholas Riccio. “It's very difficult to make plans in this job," she added.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/japan-scrambles-aircraft-after-chinese-drone-detected-off-island-near-taiwan-amid-diplomatic-tensions-details-here-1764070760725">Japan ‘scrambles aircraft’ after ‘Chinese’ drone detected off island near Taiwan amid diplomatic tensions. Details here</a>&nbsp;She also said that she has made “three different mini weekend getaway vacations” with her husband, but all her plans were cancelled due to foreign policy events. “We just roll with it. If there's a night where I happen to become free, then we take full advantage of that as a family,” Leavitt said.&nbsp;“I mean, being press secretary, especially for President Trump, is a 24/7 job,” she said.&nbsp;“My priority is to always make it home for my kid's bedtime,” she said with a smile only a mother could muster.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zelensky-thanks-13-world-leaders-on-internet-after-trump-accused-him-of-showing-zero-gratitude-for-efforts-to-end-war-with-russia-1764014092322">Zelensky thanks 13 world leaders on internet after Trump accused him of showing ‘zero gratitude’ for efforts to end war with Russia</a>&nbsp;“I leave at a more reasonable hour than people may think, because that's sort of the line I've drawn to get home and cook dinner and go through the bedtime routine and be a mom," she added. “On briefing days. I come straight to the gym here ... Usually, on briefing days, the first one in the West Wing,” she said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-pakistan-borders-may-change-defence-minister-rajnath-singh-says-sindh-may-return-to-india-after-1947-s-partition-details-here-1763906027937">India-Pakistan borders 'may change': Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says 'Sindh may return to India' after 1947's partition. Details here</a>

She has said that the cause of this situation is the demanding schedule that has led her to spend extended periods away from her family, as she explained to The Daily Mail.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that she has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) while serving under President Donald Trump. She has said that the cause of this situation is the demanding schedule that has led her to spend extended periods away from her family, as she explained to The Daily Mail. “Honestly, I have PTSD about making plans, so I just don't,” the 28-year-old told the publication regarding the challenges of coordinating time off with her husband, 60-year-old real estate developer Nicholas Riccio. “It's very difficult to make plans in this job," she added. Also read: Japan ‘scrambles aircraft’ after ‘Chinese’ drone detected off island near Taiwan amid diplomatic tensions. Details here She also said that she has made “three different mini weekend getaway vacations” with her husband, but all her plans were cancelled due to foreign policy events. “We just roll with it. If there's a night where I happen to become free, then we take full advantage of that as a family,” Leavitt said. “I mean, being press secretary, especially for President Trump, is a 24/7 job,” she said. “My priority is to always make it home for my kid's bedtime,” she said with a smile only a mother could muster. Also read: Zelensky thanks 13 world leaders on internet after Trump accused him of showing ‘zero gratitude’ for efforts to end war with Russia “I leave at a more reasonable hour than people may think, because that's sort of the line I've drawn to get home and cook dinner and go through the bedtime routine and be a mom," she added. “On briefing days. I come straight to the gym here ... Usually, on briefing days, the first one in the West Wing,” she said. Also read: India-Pakistan borders 'may change': Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says 'Sindh may return to India' after 1947's partition. Details here

She has said that the cause of this situation is the demanding schedule that has led her to spend extended periods away from her family, as she explained to The Daily Mail.

Karoline Leavitt suffering from PTSD? Trump’s Press Secretary says working under him is ‘24/7 job’

After Kabul vowed to retaliate on Tuesday (Nov 25), Pakistan denied any role in the air strikes launched in Afghanistan in which at least nine kids and a woman were killed. Islamabad's claim came after the Taliban accused it of launching the strikes and vowed to "respond appropriately". The strikes were reportedly launched in Khost province. The Taliban government accused Pakistan of targeting a civilian house, with spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid posting on X that the strikes were carried out by Pakistani forces.&nbsp;Pakistani military spokesperson, Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, said, &nbsp;“Pakistan has not attacked Afghanistan. Whenever we conduct a strike, it is announced openly and properly. Pakistan never attacks civilian populations. The allegations of the interim Afghan government are baseless.&nbsp;“Last night, around 12 o'clock, Pakistani invading forces carried out a bombing on the home of a local resident… in the Mughalgay area of Gerbaz district in Khost province,” spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid posted on X earlier. In the attack, nine children, five boys and four girls, and one woman were killed in Khost province.&nbsp;A day earlier, an explosion rocked the bordering province of Peshawar in Pakistan after a suicide bomber attack at the headquarters of the Federal Constabulary (FC). At least three people were killed, and many others were injured in the attack, said police. The civilian paramilitary force, renamed to Federal Constabulary (FC) by the government in July, is located in a crowded area, close to a military cantonment.&nbsp;So far, no group has claimed responsibility for the Monday attack, but Islamabad has blamed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which it accuses of operating from Afghan soil. Earlier this month, another suicide blast in Islamabad killed 12 people. The attack was claimed by a faction of the Pakistan Taliban, which shares the same ideology as the Afghan Taliban.&nbsp;The relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan have deteriorated since the Taliban returned to power in 2021. In October, deadly border clashes between the two neighbours killed around 70 people on both sides. Although a ceasefire was brokered by Qatar and Turkey, negotiations in Istanbul failed to provide a lasting peace deal as both nations level accusations of attacks and sheltering militants.

The Taliban government accused Pakistan of targeting a civilian house, with spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid posting on X that the strikes were carried out by Pakistani forces.

After Kabul vowed to retaliate on Tuesday (Nov 25), Pakistan denied any role in the air strikes launched in Afghanistan in which at least nine kids and a woman were killed. Islamabad's claim came after the Taliban accused it of launching the strikes and vowed to "respond appropriately". The strikes were reportedly launched in Khost province. The Taliban government accused Pakistan of targeting a civilian house, with spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid posting on X that the strikes were carried out by Pakistani forces. Pakistani military spokesperson, Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, said, “Pakistan has not attacked Afghanistan. Whenever we conduct a strike, it is announced openly and properly. Pakistan never attacks civilian populations. The allegations of the interim Afghan government are baseless. “Last night, around 12 o'clock, Pakistani invading forces carried out a bombing on the home of a local resident… in the Mughalgay area of Gerbaz district in Khost province,” spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid posted on X earlier. In the attack, nine children, five boys and four girls, and one woman were killed in Khost province. A day earlier, an explosion rocked the bordering province of Peshawar in Pakistan after a suicide bomber attack at the headquarters of the Federal Constabulary (FC). At least three people were killed, and many others were injured in the attack, said police. The civilian paramilitary force, renamed to Federal Constabulary (FC) by the government in July, is located in a crowded area, close to a military cantonment. So far, no group has claimed responsibility for the Monday attack, but Islamabad has blamed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which it accuses of operating from Afghan soil. Earlier this month, another suicide blast in Islamabad killed 12 people. The attack was claimed by a faction of the Pakistan Taliban, which shares the same ideology as the Afghan Taliban. The relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan have deteriorated since the Taliban returned to power in 2021. In October, deadly border clashes between the two neighbours killed around 70 people on both sides. Although a ceasefire was brokered by Qatar and Turkey, negotiations in Istanbul failed to provide a lasting peace deal as both nations level accusations of attacks and sheltering militants.

The Taliban government accused Pakistan of targeting a civilian house, with spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid posting on X that the strikes were carried out by Pakistani forces.

After Taliban vows ‘appropriate response’, Pakistan denies role in strikes on Afghanistan. All about the fresh tensions

Taiwanese chipmaking titan TSMC said on Tuesday it has filed a lawsuit against former executive Lo Wei-jen, alleging the "high probability" he has leaked trade secrets to his new employer Intel.Lo retired in July as senior vice president of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world's biggest chipmaker, and joined rival Intel as "executive vice president", TSMC said in a statement.TSMC said the case lodged in the Intellectual Property and Commercial Court was based on the terms of Lo's employment contract, non-compete agreement and regulations such as the Trade Secrets Act."There is a high probability that Lo uses, leaks, discloses, delivers, or transfers TSMC's trade secrets and confidential information to Intel," TSMC said.Lo was transferred to TSMC's Corporate Strategy Department in March 2024 but allegedly continued to meet with staff from Research and Development departments "to provide information for him to understand the advanced technologies currently, and planned to be, under development by TSMC", the company said.Lo had signed non-disclosure and non-compete agreements with TSMC, it said, and had told TSMC's lawyer in his exit interview that he planned to join an "academic institution".Intel did not respond immediately to AFP's request for comment.Taiwan's Ministry for Economic Affairs said it would "closely monitor any impact on the industry" and work with prosecutors and investigators to determine if the case involves "violations of the National Security Act".TSMC has been a massive beneficiary of the frenzy in artificial intelligence investment. Its clients Nvidia and Apple are among firms pouring many billions of dollars into chips, servers and data centres.Nvidia has said it would invest $5 billion in Intel, which has been struggling, in response to US President Donald Trump's desire to bring more manufacturing of semiconductors back to the United States.

TSMC said the case lodged in the Intellectual Property and Commercial Court was based on the terms of Lo employment contract, non-compete agreement and regulations such as the Trade Secrets Act.

Taiwanese chipmaking titan TSMC said on Tuesday it has filed a lawsuit against former executive Lo Wei-jen, alleging the "high probability" he has leaked trade secrets to his new employer Intel. Lo retired in July as senior vice president of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world's biggest chipmaker, and joined rival Intel as "executive vice president", TSMC said in a statement. TSMC said the case lodged in the Intellectual Property and Commercial Court was based on the terms of Lo's employment contract, non-compete agreement and regulations such as the Trade Secrets Act. "There is a high probability that Lo uses, leaks, discloses, delivers, or transfers TSMC's trade secrets and confidential information to Intel," TSMC said. Lo was transferred to TSMC's Corporate Strategy Department in March 2024 but allegedly continued to meet with staff from Research and Development departments "to provide information for him to understand the advanced technologies currently, and planned to be, under development by TSMC", the company said. Lo had signed non-disclosure and non-compete agreements with TSMC, it said, and had told TSMC's lawyer in his exit interview that he planned to join an "academic institution". Intel did not respond immediately to AFP's request for comment. Taiwan's Ministry for Economic Affairs said it would "closely monitor any impact on the industry" and work with prosecutors and investigators to determine if the case involves "violations of the National Security Act". TSMC has been a massive beneficiary of the frenzy in artificial intelligence investment. Its clients Nvidia and Apple are among firms pouring many billions of dollars into chips, servers and data centres. Nvidia has said it would invest $5 billion in Intel, which has been struggling, in response to US President Donald Trump's desire to bring more manufacturing of semiconductors back to the United States.

TSMC said the case lodged in the Intellectual Property and Commercial Court was based on the terms of Lo's employment contract, non-compete agreement and regulations such as the Trade Secrets Act.

Taiwan's TSMC to sue former executive, Lo Wei-jen, over trade secrets. Details here

Editor's note: Global Tea is a series of light-hearted and informative articles on international affairs, explaining complex issues in a simple format while staying factual and accurate, aimed at our young readers.&nbsp;If countries in the world had relationship status, China and Taiwan would be stuck on "It's complicated". &nbsp;It has been that way for over 70 years. The China-Taiwan issue is not merely a diplomatic tension. It's actually the ultimate geopolitical situationship filled with history, pride, obsession, mixed signals and the constant threat of a messy breakup.&nbsp;So get ready, cos we're about to spill the tea.&nbsp;The breakup that started it all&nbsp;Before all the drama, China and Taiwan were married and part of one giant family - the Republic of China (ROC). This family stayed till 1949. The family tensions did not start suddenly. There were fights, accusations, and strained relationships that started in 1945 - just after World War II ended. In 1949, the Chinese Civil War ended. There were two major sides: the Communists led by Mao Zedong, and the Nationalists led by Chiang Kai-shek.&nbsp;At the end of the war in December 1949, the Communists won, took over the mainland, and formed the People's Republic of China (PRC). The Nationalists, who lost, ran away to the island of Taiwan with the old government of China and formed the Republic of China (ROC).&nbsp;There started the drama. Mainland China said, "I'm the real China". But Taiwan said, "Are you kidding? I am".&nbsp;For the longest time, most of the rest of the world, like the mutual friends of a splitting couple, chose not to pick a side. These nations started recognising the “One China Policy”, with Beijing and not Taipei as the centre of China. But many of these countries still kept unofficial ties with Taiwan. It's like keeping your ex's number saved as "Pizza delivery", so no one knows.&nbsp;China felt victorious, but was still not fully satisfied.&nbsp;Over the years, Taiwan has had a major glow-up.&nbsp;Taiwan's glow up&nbsp;While China was going through famine, revolution, cultural breakdown, and Communism chaos, Taiwan was in its "focusing on myself" phase. Taiwan became everything China could only dream of: a democracy, a tech powerhouse, a global queen of semiconductor manufacturing, and a place with LGBTQ+ rights.&nbsp;Now, mainland China saw this glow up and became an obsessed ex.&nbsp;Why can't China just let go?&nbsp;This is not only about emotions. China's obsession is strategic, historical, and deeply political.&nbsp;These are the reasons China just can't move on:&nbsp;1. National prideFor Beijing, Taiwan is more than just a geographical territory. It's the identity. The entire existence of the Communist Party of China is based on one promise from the people of mainland China - to restore China's "lost glory". For this mission, the party wants Taiwan back, the last remaining piece of what China believes should be part of the mainland, even if by force.&nbsp;For President Xi Jinping, getting Taiwan back is not optional - it's an absolute necessity.&nbsp;If he makes it possible, he would become the leader who completed China’s "unfinished mission".&nbsp;2. Geographical importanceJust one look at the map, and you will understand why China is so anxious. Taiwan is right at China's southeast coast - the entrance to the strategically important South China Sea. It blocks China from accessing the deeper waters of the Pacific.&nbsp;And even more importantly, Taiwan is inside the US-led First Island Chain. This chain comprises Japan → Taiwan → Philippines → Borneo.&nbsp;3. SemiconductorsIn this aspect, Taiwan is basically the Silicon Beyoncé of the world. The island nation, via its top companies like TSMC, accounts for 60 per cent of the global semiconductor production, or over 90 per cent of the world's advanced chips.&nbsp;And keep in mind, these are not random chips. These chips run: iPhones, Teslas, AI systems, fighter jets, cloud servers and satellites, among other things. The modern world just can't function without Taiwan's chip industry.&nbsp;Hence, for China, having control over Taiwan is like controlling the beating heart of global tech.&nbsp;&nbsp;Now it's not like China had not tried its hand in the industry. Beijing has invested billions in domestic chip production. Still, it is 5-10 years behind Taiwan.&nbsp;Why Taiwan isn't interested&nbsp;Taiwan is living its best life. Taiwan has everything China doesn't:&nbsp;1. Complete democracy:&nbsp;Taiwan has free elections, multiple political parties, protests, LGBTQ rights, press freedom - the whole package. China? Absolutely opposite.&nbsp;2. ProgressiveTaiwan was the first ever country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage.&nbsp;3. Tech-richFrom TSMC to its EV sector to its innovation ecosystem, Taiwan punches way above its weight on the global stage. It’s the cool kid in the tech school.&nbsp;4. Allergic to authoritarianismAfter living for decades in a democracy, the youth in Taiwan identify as “Taiwanese,” not Chinese.” As per polls, less than 3 per cent of young Taiwanese want a reunion with China.&nbsp;So, for Taiwan, China is not the "lost motherland". It's the ex who just can't stop texting.&nbsp;US - the nosy friend&nbsp;Think of Asia as a giant neighbourhood — and Taiwan is the house located right at the entrance of the street. If China takes that house, the whole balance of the neighbourhood shifts.&nbsp;Here's why the US is interested in the whole drama:&nbsp;America and its allies - Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia - are part of the First Island Chain. It's a natural barrier that covers Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines and Borneo.&nbsp;This chain limits China’s navy and air force movement, protects US allies, and provides US strategic depth in the Pacific. In this chain, Taiwan sits RIGHT in the middle. Therefore, if the US were not alert, China might take over Taiwan, break the whole chain, and get a straight path into the Pacific.&nbsp;If China gets Taiwan, the Chinese military will reach the Second Island Chain as well. This will help China project power deeper toward Guam, a major US military base. It can threaten supply routes linking the US to Asia, pressure Japan and the Philippines, and dominate the South China Sea.&nbsp;If China gets control of Taiwan, the US would no longer have access to Taiwanese chips, and it might lose access to the world’s most advanced semiconductor technology.&nbsp;For the US, it’s like handing your arch-rival the master key.&nbsp;Moreover, the US knows that its allies are watching. Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Philippines - all depend on US protection.&nbsp;If America fails to protect Taiwan, these allies will no longer trust the US. This simply means: more countries may drift toward China, American influence would shrink, and China could become the uncontested power in Asia.&nbsp;What's Japan's role?&nbsp;Imagine Japan as the quiet friend with popcorn, but also a samurai sword.Japan’s southern islands, especially Okinawa and the Ryukyu chain, sit right next to Taiwan. This means that if China takes over Taiwan, Japan simply will become the frontline territory.&nbsp;Interesting side note: The US and Japan have a security alliance. Under the deal, Japan hosts 50,000+ US troops, multiple bases, and key naval assets. This also means that the US would use Japanese bases in a China-Taiwan conflict, and Japan would likely support US forces with logistics, intelligence, missile defence, and protection of bases.&nbsp;China knows this. Taiwan knows this. The whole world knows this.&nbsp;So, when you zoom out, the whole China–Taiwan saga basically feels like the geopolitical version of a “will-they-won’t-they” couple that desperately needs therapy. Every week, we wake up to a new stunt, fighter jets, fiery speeches, and flexing with airspace and maritime territory violations.&nbsp;And honestly, it’s giving season finale vibes, with no promise of renewal or cancellation.

For Beijing, Taiwan is more than just a geographical territory. It is the identity. The entire existence of the Communist Party of China is based on one promise from the people of mainland China - to restore China lost glory. 

Editor's note: Global Tea is a series of light-hearted and informative articles on international affairs, explaining complex issues in a simple format while staying factual and accurate, aimed at our young readers. If countries in the world had relationship status, China and Taiwan would be stuck on "It's complicated". It has been that way for over 70 years. The China-Taiwan issue is not merely a diplomatic tension. It's actually the ultimate geopolitical situationship filled with history, pride, obsession, mixed signals and the constant threat of a messy breakup. So get ready, cos we're about to spill the tea. The breakup that started it all Before all the drama, China and Taiwan were married and part of one giant family - the Republic of China (ROC). This family stayed till 1949. The family tensions did not start suddenly. There were fights, accusations, and strained relationships that started in 1945 - just after World War II ended. In 1949, the Chinese Civil War ended. There were two major sides: the Communists led by Mao Zedong, and the Nationalists led by Chiang Kai-shek. At the end of the war in December 1949, the Communists won, took over the mainland, and formed the People's Republic of China (PRC). The Nationalists, who lost, ran away to the island of Taiwan with the old government of China and formed the Republic of China (ROC). There started the drama. Mainland China said, "I'm the real China". But Taiwan said, "Are you kidding? I am". For the longest time, most of the rest of the world, like the mutual friends of a splitting couple, chose not to pick a side. These nations started recognising the “One China Policy”, with Beijing and not Taipei as the centre of China. But many of these countries still kept unofficial ties with Taiwan. It's like keeping your ex's number saved as "Pizza delivery", so no one knows. China felt victorious, but was still not fully satisfied. Over the years, Taiwan has had a major glow-up. Taiwan's glow up While China was going through famine, revolution, cultural breakdown, and Communism chaos, Taiwan was in its "focusing on myself" phase. Taiwan became everything China could only dream of: a democracy, a tech powerhouse, a global queen of semiconductor manufacturing, and a place with LGBTQ+ rights. Now, mainland China saw this glow up and became an obsessed ex. Why can't China just let go? This is not only about emotions. China's obsession is strategic, historical, and deeply political. These are the reasons China just can't move on: 1. National pride For Beijing, Taiwan is more than just a geographical territory. It's the identity. The entire existence of the Communist Party of China is based on one promise from the people of mainland China - to restore China's "lost glory". For this mission, the party wants Taiwan back, the last remaining piece of what China believes should be part of the mainland, even if by force. For President Xi Jinping, getting Taiwan back is not optional - it's an absolute necessity. If he makes it possible, he would become the leader who completed China’s "unfinished mission". 2. Geographical importance Just one look at the map, and you will understand why China is so anxious. Taiwan is right at China's southeast coast - the entrance to the strategically important South China Sea. It blocks China from accessing the deeper waters of the Pacific. And even more importantly, Taiwan is inside the US-led First Island Chain. This chain comprises Japan → Taiwan → Philippines → Borneo. 3. Semiconductors In this aspect, Taiwan is basically the Silicon Beyoncé of the world. The island nation, via its top companies like TSMC, accounts for 60 per cent of the global semiconductor production, or over 90 per cent of the world's advanced chips. And keep in mind, these are not random chips. These chips run: iPhones, Teslas, AI systems, fighter jets, cloud servers and satellites, among other things. The modern world just can't function without Taiwan's chip industry. Hence, for China, having control over Taiwan is like controlling the beating heart of global tech. Now it's not like China had not tried its hand in the industry. Beijing has invested billions in domestic chip production. Still, it is 5-10 years behind Taiwan. Why Taiwan isn't interested Taiwan is living its best life. Taiwan has everything China doesn't: 1. Complete democracy: Taiwan has free elections, multiple political parties, protests, LGBTQ rights, press freedom - the whole package. China? Absolutely opposite. 2. Progressive Taiwan was the first ever country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage. 3. Tech-rich From TSMC to its EV sector to its innovation ecosystem, Taiwan punches way above its weight on the global stage. It’s the cool kid in the tech school. 4. Allergic to authoritarianism After living for decades in a democracy, the youth in Taiwan identify as “Taiwanese,” not Chinese.” As per polls, less than 3 per cent of young Taiwanese want a reunion with China. So, for Taiwan, China is not the "lost motherland". It's the ex who just can't stop texting. US - the nosy friend Think of Asia as a giant neighbourhood — and Taiwan is the house located right at the entrance of the street. If China takes that house, the whole balance of the neighbourhood shifts. Here's why the US is interested in the whole drama: America and its allies - Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia - are part of the First Island Chain. It's a natural barrier that covers Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines and Borneo. This chain limits China’s navy and air force movement, protects US allies, and provides US strategic depth in the Pacific. In this chain, Taiwan sits RIGHT in the middle. Therefore, if the US were not alert, China might take over Taiwan, break the whole chain, and get a straight path into the Pacific. If China gets Taiwan, the Chinese military will reach the Second Island Chain as well. This will help China project power deeper toward Guam, a major US military base. It can threaten supply routes linking the US to Asia, pressure Japan and the Philippines, and dominate the South China Sea. If China gets control of Taiwan, the US would no longer have access to Taiwanese chips, and it might lose access to the world’s most advanced semiconductor technology. For the US, it’s like handing your arch-rival the master key. Moreover, the US knows that its allies are watching. Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Philippines - all depend on US protection. If America fails to protect Taiwan, these allies will no longer trust the US. This simply means: more countries may drift toward China, American influence would shrink, and China could become the uncontested power in Asia. What's Japan's role? Imagine Japan as the quiet friend with popcorn, but also a samurai sword. Japan’s southern islands, especially Okinawa and the Ryukyu chain, sit right next to Taiwan. This means that if China takes over Taiwan, Japan simply will become the frontline territory. Interesting side note: The US and Japan have a security alliance. Under the deal, Japan hosts 50,000+ US troops, multiple bases, and key naval assets. This also means that the US would use Japanese bases in a China-Taiwan conflict, and Japan would likely support US forces with logistics, intelligence, missile defence, and protection of bases. China knows this. Taiwan knows this. The whole world knows this. So, when you zoom out, the whole China–Taiwan saga basically feels like the geopolitical version of a “will-they-won’t-they” couple that desperately needs therapy. Every week, we wake up to a new stunt, fighter jets, fiery speeches, and flexing with airspace and maritime territory violations. And honestly, it’s giving season finale vibes, with no promise of renewal or cancellation.

For Beijing, Taiwan is more than just a geographical territory. It's the identity. The entire existence of the Communist Party of China is based on one promise from the people of mainland China - to restore China's "lost glory".

GLOBAL TEA | China and Taiwan: World's most complicated situationship

The recent photo shoot of Michelle Obama with renowned photographer Annie Leibovitz, shared on social media, has generated a wave of online discussion, with speculation of using weight loss drugs such as Ozempic. In behind-the-scenes clips, the former first lady can be seen in jeans, a grey T-shirt, and brown suede boots, showing off a toned stomach and arms.&nbsp;Michelle Obama, 61, has been opening up about her personal style and self-expression while promoting her November fashion memoir, The Look. Her outfits have drawn widespread praise, though some social media users have speculated about the possible use of weight-loss medication as she appears slimmer.&nbsp;In the video, she strikes a confident pose wearing a dark grey collared V-neck tee and distressed blue jeans. A wide brown leather belt and matching brown suede boots completed the outfit, while a wind machine sent her hair sweeping dramatically behind her.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Even though I’m very thin, like all women I deal with the topic of weight on a daily basis… 😅 Do any of you have any idea how Michelle Obama suddenly lost all this weight at 61, which is also a difficult age for a woman to slim down?<a href="https://t.co/XoO0Gz4JCV">pic.twitter.com/XoO0Gz4JCV</a>&mdash; Mambo Italiano (@mamboitaliano__) <a href="https://twitter.com/mamboitaliano__/status/1992280513189458417?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h3>Netizens react to Michelle Obama’s video on X</h3>As the video of the former first lady surfaced with her relaxed and confident look, netizens rushed to X to discuss her slimmed-down look. One of the users said," It’s one of the GLP-1 meds. I think. They’ve certainly helped me when nothing else really did. It’s interesting people are “showing off” the results without crediting the method. Taking the medication isn’t cheating. Not telling people with your struggle what you did is unfair."&nbsp;The next said, "She’s always been fit and perhaps it’s diet or she’s indulging in injections. I’m 61 and lost over 40 lbs. She’s a person like the rest of us. To be honest, it’s really none of our business. Just say she looks good and keep moving."&nbsp;"Ozempic - just like everyone on The View who suddenly decided to “get healthy”. I’m not knocking it - but for Christ’s sake- be honest about it!" another said.&nbsp;The next also said," Hi!! Nurse here!! Although I can’t be totally sure, the face looks a bit gaunt due to fat stores being lost… this is super common with GLP 1 medications like Ozempic,etc."

Michelle Obama has been opening up about her personal style and self-expression while promoting her November fashion memoir, The Look. Her outfits have drawn widespread praise, though some social media users have speculated about the possible use of the Ozempic drug.

The recent photo shoot of Michelle Obama with renowned photographer Annie Leibovitz, shared on social media, has generated a wave of online discussion, with speculation of using weight loss drugs such as Ozempic. In behind-the-scenes clips, the former first lady can be seen in jeans, a grey T-shirt, and brown suede boots, showing off a toned stomach and arms. Michelle Obama, 61, has been opening up about her personal style and self-expression while promoting her November fashion memoir, The Look. Her outfits have drawn widespread praise, though some social media users have speculated about the possible use of weight-loss medication as she appears slimmer. In the video, she strikes a confident pose wearing a dark grey collared V-neck tee and distressed blue jeans. A wide brown leather belt and matching brown suede boots completed the outfit, while a wind machine sent her hair sweeping dramatically behind her.

Michelle Obama has been opening up about her personal style and self-expression while promoting her November fashion memoir, The Look. Her outfits have drawn widespread praise, though some social media users have speculated about the possible use of the Ozempic drug.

‘Is it Ozempic?’ Michelle Obama’s latest photoshoot sneak peek goes viral, netizens speculate weight-loss meds

A couple in New York City was brutally attacked by a mob when they tried to stop them from descending onto their area during an out-of-control car meet-up. Multiple vehicles were set on fire during the incident. Vickie Paladino, a member of the New York City Council, posted a video, which went viral, showing a bunch of reckless drivers speeding over lawns and doing doughnuts shortly after midnight on Sunday (Nov 23) in Malba, a wealthy Queens neighbourhood. The video shows members of the mob watching as cars speed around the blazing vehicle.&nbsp;Blake Ferrer and his spouse were assaulted after attempting to remove the unruly group from their premises. “When I came out, I said, ‘Bro, you gotta get the f*** off my property,’ and that’s when it all started,” Ferrer told The New York Post. Around 12 people kicked and punched the couple which leaving them with a broken nose and ribs.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">So <a href="https://twitter.com/ZohranKMamdani?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ZohranKMamdani</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/NYPDPC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NYPDPC</a> have no comment on the lack of response to this in Malba, Queens, NYC? <a href="https://t.co/Iqe1B7LzW8">pic.twitter.com/Iqe1B7LzW8</a>&mdash; Chewy Yorkie (@ChewyYorkie) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChewyYorkie/status/1992785835553665421?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Last night in Malba, a large group of individuals from outside my district conducted an illegal &#39;takeover&#39; of a quiet residential street at approximately 12:30am. This is not the first time it&#39;s happened. A private security guard attempted to calm the situation -- he was… <a href="https://t.co/sSL7aWuufC">pic.twitter.com/sSL7aWuufC</a>&mdash; Councilwoman Vickie Paladino (@VickieforNYC) <a href="https://twitter.com/VickieforNYC/status/1992660738465517676?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Vickie Paladino, a member of the New York City Council, posted a video, which went viral, showing a bunch of reckless drivers speeding over lawns and doing doughnuts shortly after midnight on Sunday in Malba, a wealthy Queens neighbourhood. 

A couple in New York City was brutally attacked by a mob when they tried to stop them from descending onto their area during an out-of-control car meet-up. Multiple vehicles were set on fire during the incident. Vickie Paladino, a member of the New York City Council, posted a video, which went viral, showing a bunch of reckless drivers speeding over lawns and doing doughnuts shortly after midnight on Sunday (Nov 23) in Malba, a wealthy Queens neighbourhood. The video shows members of the mob watching as cars speed around the blazing vehicle. Blake Ferrer and his spouse were assaulted after attempting to remove the unruly group from their premises. “When I came out, I said, ‘Bro, you gotta get the f*** off my property,’ and that’s when it all started,” Ferrer told The New York Post. Around 12 people kicked and punched the couple which leaving them with a broken nose and ribs.

Vickie Paladino, a member of the New York City Council, posted a video, which went viral, showing a bunch of reckless drivers speeding over lawns and doing doughnuts shortly after midnight on Sunday in Malba, a wealthy Queens neighbourhood.&nbsp;

WATCH: New York couple brutally assaulted by mob, gets nose and ribs broken

Amid the diplomatic tensions with China over Taiwan, Japan said on Tuesday (Nov 25) that it has "s "scrambled aircraft" after detecting a suspected Chinese drone off an island near Taiwan. The suspected drone was spotted off Japan's Yonaguni, an island where Tokyo is planning to deploy missiles in a move that has angered Beijing. "We confirmed that an unmanned aerial vehicle believed to be Chinese passed between Yonaguni Island and Taiwan on Monday," Japan's defence ministry said on X.&nbsp;This came a day after the Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the Taiwan issue with the US President Donald Trump over a call. He told the American president that Taiwan's "return to China" is a key part of the post-war international order. "China and the United States once fought side by side against fascism and militarism, and should now work together to safeguard the outcomes of World War Two," Xi was quoted as saying by Xinhua. Beijing says Takaichi’s ‘Taiwan’ remark ‘crossed a red line’&nbsp;The Foreign Minister of Beijing, Wang Yi, launched a verbal attack on Tokyo. The minister said the remarks of the new Japanese Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, "crossed a line". He also said that China must “resolutely respond” to the comments to safeguard the country’s sovereignty and defend its post-war achievements.&nbsp;“It is shocking that Japan’s current leader has publicly sent the wrong signal of attempting military intervention in the Taiwan issue, said things that shouldn’t have been said, and crossed a red line that should not have been touched,” Wang said in a statement released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Sunday.&nbsp;“This is not only to safeguard China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also to defend the post-war achievements won with blood and lives, and to uphold international justice and human conscience," the minister added.&nbsp;‘Japan not qualified to become permanent UNSC member’&nbsp;Meanwhile, China claimed on Wednesday (Nov 19) that Japan was not "qualified" to become a permanent member of the UNSC. The Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said, Japan is “incapable of shouldering the responsibility of safeguarding international peace and security." This was amid the tensions over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan. Mao said Japan “is not qualified to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council".&nbsp;At present, the UNSC has five permanent members: China, the US, the UK, France, and Russia. Countries like India have called for reforms to the UN Security Council so that it reflects the current multipolar order. “Japan has not fully reflected on its wartime responsibilities and Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has recently made erroneous remarks about Taiwan, challenging the post-war international order," Ning said.

This came a day after the Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the Taiwan issue with the US President Donald Trump over a call. He told the American president that Taiwan return to China is a key part of the post-war international order.

Amid the diplomatic tensions with China over Taiwan, Japan said on Tuesday (Nov 25) that it has "s "scrambled aircraft" after detecting a suspected Chinese drone off an island near Taiwan. The suspected drone was spotted off Japan's Yonaguni, an island where Tokyo is planning to deploy missiles in a move that has angered Beijing. "We confirmed that an unmanned aerial vehicle believed to be Chinese passed between Yonaguni Island and Taiwan on Monday," Japan's defence ministry said on X. This came a day after the Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the Taiwan issue with the US President Donald Trump over a call. He told the American president that Taiwan's "return to China" is a key part of the post-war international order. "China and the United States once fought side by side against fascism and militarism, and should now work together to safeguard the outcomes of World War Two," Xi was quoted as saying by Xinhua. Beijing says Takaichi’s ‘Taiwan’ remark ‘crossed a red line’ The Foreign Minister of Beijing, Wang Yi, launched a verbal attack on Tokyo. The minister said the remarks of the new Japanese Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, "crossed a line". He also said that China must “resolutely respond” to the comments to safeguard the country’s sovereignty and defend its post-war achievements. “It is shocking that Japan’s current leader has publicly sent the wrong signal of attempting military intervention in the Taiwan issue, said things that shouldn’t have been said, and crossed a red line that should not have been touched,” Wang said in a statement released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Sunday. “This is not only to safeguard China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also to defend the post-war achievements won with blood and lives, and to uphold international justice and human conscience," the minister added. ‘Japan not qualified to become permanent UNSC member’ Meanwhile, China claimed on Wednesday (Nov 19) that Japan was not "qualified" to become a permanent member of the UNSC. The Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said, Japan is “incapable of shouldering the responsibility of safeguarding international peace and security." This was amid the tensions over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan. Mao said Japan “is not qualified to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council". At present, the UNSC has five permanent members: China, the US, the UK, France, and Russia. Countries like India have called for reforms to the UN Security Council so that it reflects the current multipolar order. “Japan has not fully reflected on its wartime responsibilities and Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has recently made erroneous remarks about Taiwan, challenging the post-war international order," Ning said.

This came a day after the Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the Taiwan issue with the US President Donald Trump over a call. He told the American president that Taiwan's "return to China" is a key part of the post-war international order.

Japan ‘scrambles aircraft’ after ‘Chinese’ drone detected off island near Taiwan amid diplomatic tensions. Details here

&nbsp;The United Kingdom is set to roll out Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) from February 2026, marking a significant change in British immigration procedures in recent years. The scheme will require foreign travellers to seek advance digital clearance before entering the country. This mandates visitors from 85 nations, who currently don’t need a visa, to have an ETA to be able to travel to the UK from February 25, next year.<h2>What is ETA?</h2>The ETA is a digital permit that allows individuals to stay in the UK for up to six months to visit family or for tourism purposes. It is not a visa or tax, and is applicable to those who don’t already need a visa, like people from the EU, the US and Canada. Travellers would be required to obtain the permit before boarding a flight.The first phase of the scheme was launched in October 2023 for some nationalities. According to the UK government, more than 13.3 million ETAs have been issued since the initial rollout.<h2>Will India be affected?</h2>Indians will not be affected by ETA as they already require UK visas. All visitors to the UK now must either have an ETA or an eVisa before travelling.<h2>Which countries are affected? Full list</h2>People from the following countries will now require an ETA before travelling to the UK:<ul><li>Andorra</li><li>Antigua and Barbuda</li><li>Argentina</li><li>Australia</li><li>Austria</li><li>The Bahamas</li><li>Bahrain</li><li>Barbados</li><li>Belgium</li><li>Belize</li><li>Brazil</li><li>Brunei</li><li>Bulgaria</li><li>Canada</li><li>Chile</li><li>Costa Rica</li><li>Croatia</li><li>Cyprus</li><li>Czechia</li><li>Denmark</li><li>Estonia</li><li>Finland</li><li>France</li><li>Germany</li><li>Greece</li><li>Grenada</li><li>Guatemala</li><li>Guyana</li><li>Hong Kong Special Administrative Region</li><li>Hungary</li><li>Iceland</li><li>Italy</li><li>Israel</li><li>Japan</li><li>Kiribati</li><li>Kuwait</li><li>Latvia</li><li>Liechtenstein</li><li>Lithuania</li><li>Luxembourg</li><li>Macao Special Administrative Region</li><li>Malaysia</li><li>Maldives</li><li>Malta</li><li>Marshall Islands</li><li>Mauritius</li><li>Mexico</li><li>Federated States of Micronesia</li><li>Monaco</li><li>Nauru</li><li>Netherlands</li><li>New Zealand</li><li>Nicaragua</li><li>Norway</li><li>Oman</li><li>Palau</li><li>Panama</li><li>Papua New Guinea</li><li>Paraguay</li><li>Peru</li><li>Poland</li><li>Portugal</li><li>Qatar</li><li>Romania</li><li>Samoa</li><li>San Marino</li><li>Saudi Arabia</li><li>Seychelles</li><li>Singapore</li><li>Solomon Islands</li><li>South Korea</li><li>Slovakia</li><li>Slovenia</li><li>Spain</li><li>St Kitts and Nevis</li><li>St Lucia</li><li>St Vincent and the Grenadines</li><li>Sweden</li><li>Switzerland</li><li>Tonga</li><li>Tuvalu</li><li>United Arab Emirates</li><li>United States</li><li>Uruguay</li><li>Vatican City</li></ul>

The first phase of the scheme was launched in October 2023 for some nationalities. According to the UK government, more than 13.3 million ETAs have been issued since the initial rollout.

The United Kingdom is set to roll out Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) from February 2026, marking a significant change in British immigration procedures in recent years. The scheme will require foreign travellers to seek advance digital clearance before entering the country. This mandates visitors from 85 nations, who currently don’t need a visa, to have an ETA to be able to travel to the UK from February 25, next year. What is ETA? The ETA is a digital permit that allows individuals to stay in the UK for up to six months to visit family or for tourism purposes. It is not a visa or tax, and is applicable to those who don’t already need a visa, like people from the EU, the US and Canada. Travellers would be required to obtain the permit before boarding a flight. The first phase of the scheme was launched in October 2023 for some nationalities. According to the UK government, more than 13.3 million ETAs have been issued since the initial rollout. Will India be affected? Indians will not be affected by ETA as they already require UK visas. All visitors to the UK now must either have an ETA or an eVisa before travelling. Which countries are affected? Full list People from the following countries will now require an ETA before travelling to the UK: Andorra Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Australia Austria The Bahamas Bahrain Barbados Belgium Belize Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Canada Chile Costa Rica Croatia Cyprus Czechia Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Hungary Iceland Italy Israel Japan Kiribati Kuwait Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Special Administrative Region Malaysia Maldives Malta Marshall Islands Mauritius Mexico Federated States of Micronesia Monaco Nauru Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Norway Oman Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Samoa San Marino Saudi Arabia Seychelles Singapore Solomon Islands South Korea Slovakia Slovenia Spain St Kitts and Nevis St Lucia St Vincent and the Grenadines Sweden Switzerland Tonga Tuvalu United Arab Emirates United States Uruguay Vatican City

The first phase of the scheme was launched in October 2023 for some nationalities. According to the UK government, more than 13.3 million ETAs have been issued since the initial rollout.

UK set to roll out new ETA rule for foreign travellers – Which countries are affected? Is India on the list?

An Australian senator, Pauline Hanson, who wore a burqa in the parliament in her bid to ban the Islamic dress, has been suspended for a week. &nbsp;Hanson, a far-right Australian politician, in a bid to ban the burqa, wore the Islamic dress in the Parliament on Monday (Nov 24). The political stunt has sparked accusations of racism from Muslim senators in the country. After she was denied to introduce a bill that would outlaw burqas and other full-face coverings in public places in Australia, the politician wore one in the parliament.&nbsp;It was the second time Hanson had used the head garment, worn by some Muslim women, in parliament in an effort to ban the public wearing of burqas.&nbsp;"This is a racist senator, displaying blatant racism," said Muslim Mehreen Faruqi, a Greens senator from the state of New South Wales. Muslim Fatima Payman, an independent senator from the state of Western Australia, called the act "disgraceful". In a statement later posted on Facebook, Hanson said her actions were in protest at the Senate's rejection of her proposed bill.&nbsp;"So if the Parliament won't ban it, I will display this oppressive, radical, non-religious head garb that risk our national security and the ill-treatment of women on the floor of our parliament so that every Australian knows what's at stake," Hanson said in the statement. "If they don't want me wearing it - ban the burqa," she said.&nbsp;Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who also serves as leader of the government in the Senate, condemned it as "disrespectful".&nbsp;&nbsp;"All of us in this place have a great privilege in coming into this chamber," Wong said.&nbsp;"We represent in our states, people of every faith, of every faith, of all backgrounds. And we should do so decently."&nbsp;

The political stunt has sparked accusations of racism from Muslim senators in the country. After she was denied to introduce a bill that would outlaw burqas and other full-face coverings in public places in Australia, the politician wore one in the parliament.

An Australian senator, Pauline Hanson, who wore a burqa in the parliament in her bid to ban the Islamic dress, has been suspended for a week. Hanson, a far-right Australian politician, in a bid to ban the burqa, wore the Islamic dress in the Parliament on Monday (Nov 24). The political stunt has sparked accusations of racism from Muslim senators in the country. After she was denied to introduce a bill that would outlaw burqas and other full-face coverings in public places in Australia, the politician wore one in the parliament. It was the second time Hanson had used the head garment, worn by some Muslim women, in parliament in an effort to ban the public wearing of burqas. "This is a racist senator, displaying blatant racism," said Muslim Mehreen Faruqi, a Greens senator from the state of New South Wales. Muslim Fatima Payman, an independent senator from the state of Western Australia, called the act "disgraceful". In a statement later posted on Facebook, Hanson said her actions were in protest at the Senate's rejection of her proposed bill. "So if the Parliament won't ban it, I will display this oppressive, radical, non-religious head garb that risk our national security and the ill-treatment of women on the floor of our parliament so that every Australian knows what's at stake," Hanson said in the statement. "If they don't want me wearing it - ban the burqa," she said. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who also serves as leader of the government in the Senate, condemned it as "disrespectful". "All of us in this place have a great privilege in coming into this chamber," Wong said. "We represent in our states, people of every faith, of every faith, of all backgrounds. And we should do so decently."

The political stunt has sparked accusations of racism from Muslim senators in the country. After she was denied to introduce a bill that would outlaw burqas and other full-face coverings in public places in Australia, the politician wore one in the parliament.

Australia senator, who wore burqa in parl in bid to ban it, suspended. Here's all about it

The China-Japan war-of-words is now playing out in the United Nations (UN). While China took the issue to the UN accusing Tokyo of threatening "an armed intervention" over Taiwan, Japan has rejected the accusations in a letter to the UN chief. Japan has said that China has misrepresented the statement by its Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, Beijing’s letter to the UN was “inconsistent with the facts and unsubstantiated.” Meanwhile, Bloomberg reported that airlines in China have been instructed to scale back flights to Japan.&nbsp;"China’s assertion that Japan would exercise the right of self-defense even in the absence of an armed attack is erroneous," Japanese Ambassador to the UN Kazuyuki Yamazaki wrote in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres dated Nov. 24. Yamazaki said Japan has consistently contributed to the peace and prosperity of the international community since the end of the Second World War. "Japan has always respected and adhered to international law, including the UN Charter, and has actively contributed to maintaining and strengthening a free and open international order underpinned by the rule of law in the global community,” Yamazaki added in his letter.&nbsp;Explaining that Japan’s defence posture remains strictly defensive and passive, Yamazaki criticised China's move to freeze bilateral exchanges and imposing economic pressure, including restrictions on Japanese seafood imports, calling such coercive steps unacceptable. Tokyo said it will continue pursuing “calm diplomacy.”<h2>What was Takaichi's statement?</h2>On Nov 14, Takaichi was asked by an opposition lawmaker in parliament about “survival-threatening situations.” In response, Takaichi gave an example that an attempt to bring Taiwan completely under the control of Beijing using battleships and military force could constitute such a situation. She also added that an attack on US warships sent to break any Chinese blockade on Taiwan could require Tokyo to intervene militarily to defend itself and its ally.<h2>What is the meaning of ‘survival-threatening situations’?</h2>The term ‘survival-threatening situation’ used by Japanese Prime Minister Takaichi refers to a specific legal term in Japanese law that was made under the 2015 security legislation. It describes a situation where an armed attack on a foreign country closely related to Japan poses a threat to Japan's survival and clearly endangers the fundamental rights of the Japanese people. Under the law, the Japan Self-Defense Forces (JSDF) can retaliate alongside the US and other nations based on their right of collective self-defence, even if Japan itself is not under attack. To make the law effective, three conditions must be met: first, an armed attack occurs against a country closely related to Japan; second, there is a clear danger to Japan’s existence; and third, there are no other appropriate means available. When these conditions are met, the government will resort to the “minimum necessary use of force.”

The diplomatic tensions between China and Japan has now reached the UN. Both sides have once again blamed each other. The diplomatic fallout was triggered after Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi spoke about Taiwan 

The China-Japan war-of-words is now playing out in the United Nations (UN). While China took the issue to the UN accusing Tokyo of threatening "an armed intervention" over Taiwan, Japan has rejected the accusations in a letter to the UN chief. Japan has said that China has misrepresented the statement by its Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, Beijing’s letter to the UN was “inconsistent with the facts and unsubstantiated.” Meanwhile, Bloomberg reported that airlines in China have been instructed to scale back flights to Japan. "China’s assertion that Japan would exercise the right of self-defense even in the absence of an armed attack is erroneous," Japanese Ambassador to the UN Kazuyuki Yamazaki wrote in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres dated Nov. 24. Yamazaki said Japan has consistently contributed to the peace and prosperity of the international community since the end of the Second World War. "Japan has always respected and adhered to international law, including the UN Charter, and has actively contributed to maintaining and strengthening a free and open international order underpinned by the rule of law in the global community,” Yamazaki added in his letter. Explaining that Japan’s defence posture remains strictly defensive and passive, Yamazaki criticised China's move to freeze bilateral exchanges and imposing economic pressure, including restrictions on Japanese seafood imports, calling such coercive steps unacceptable. Tokyo said it will continue pursuing “calm diplomacy.” What was Takaichi's statement? On Nov 14, Takaichi was asked by an opposition lawmaker in parliament about “survival-threatening situations.” In response, Takaichi gave an example that an attempt to bring Taiwan completely under the control of Beijing using battleships and military force could constitute such a situation. She also added that an attack on US warships sent to break any Chinese blockade on Taiwan could require Tokyo to intervene militarily to defend itself and its ally. What is the meaning of ‘survival-threatening situations’? The term ‘survival-threatening situation’ used by Japanese Prime Minister Takaichi refers to a specific legal term in Japanese law that was made under the 2015 security legislation. It describes a situation where an armed attack on a foreign country closely related to Japan poses a threat to Japan's survival and clearly endangers the fundamental rights of the Japanese people. Under the law, the Japan Self-Defense Forces (JSDF) can retaliate alongside the US and other nations based on their right of collective self-defence, even if Japan itself is not under attack. To make the law effective, three conditions must be met: first, an armed attack occurs against a country closely related to Japan; second, there is a clear danger to Japan’s existence; and third, there are no other appropriate means available. When these conditions are met, the government will resort to the “minimum necessary use of force.”

The diplomatic tensions between China and Japan has now reached the UN. Both sides have once again blamed each other. The diplomatic fallout was triggered after Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi spoke about Taiwan&nbsp;

China-Japan dispute reaches UN: Tokyo calls Beijing's 'armed intervention in Taiwan' claims 'erroneous'

American and Russian officials are holding secret negotiations in Abu Dhabi on Tuesday (Nov 25) for peace in Ukraine, even as Moscow's deadly overnight strike on Kyiv killed at least six people. The meetings in the UAE come as US President Donald Trump set a Thanksgiving Day deadline for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to accept a peace plan. The Wednesday deadline followed the leak of a US 28‑point peace proposal that has sparked strong criticism. Over the weekend, European leaders put forward an alternative during talks in Geneva, and Zelensky is reportedly making adjustments to the US-drafted plan to better reflect Ukraine’s security priorities. Here is what is known, based on reports.<h2>What is Zelensky doing to the Ukraine peace plan?</h2>President Zelensky and his advisers are reportedly pushing to refine the US proposal in a way that preserves Ukraine’s sovereignty and avoids any sense of capitulation to Moscow. The original US draft would have asked Ukraine to cede some Russian-occupied territories, cap its army at 600,000 troops, and renounce future NATO membership ambitions. That version was strongly criticised in Kyiv and by European governments as favouring Russia. Zelensky is pressing for stronger security guarantees and safeguards, despite pressure from Washington to move fast on the peace effort. The European counter‑proposal, emerging from Geneva, omitted outright pro-Russian concessions and instead envisaged freezing the current front line for future territorial negotiations. It also includes NATO-style security assurances for Ukraine — a formula Kyiv is said to be weighing seriously alongside the US draft.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-ukraine-war-europe-s-peace-plan-leaks-how-similar-or-different-is-it-from-leaked-us-plan-1763978380649">Russia-Ukraine war: Europe's peace plan 'leaks'. How similar or different is it from leaked US plan?</a><h2>Who are attending the UAE crunch talks?</h2>The Abu Dhabi talks are being led on the American side by US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll. Also involved are Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. A Russian delegation is present, though names have not been publicly announced. According to some reports, Ukraine’s military intelligence chief, Kyrylo Budanov, is participating separately, focusing specifically on security guarantees. This marks the first direct US-Russia diplomatic engagement on Ukraine since Trump pushed for a rapid-resolution plan. The US proposal has reportedly been slimmed down from 28 to around 19 points, aiming to concentrate on key issues such as territorial concessions and military limits, while preserving core American demands. Russia has described the plan as a “good basis,” but continues to insist that Ukraine remain politically and militarily subordinate. Meanwhile, Ukraine is demanding enforceable NATO-style protections and refuses to give up land.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-zero-gratitude-from-ukraine-trump-s-rants-about-inherited-russia-ukraine-war-slams-europe-amid-talks-on-peace-plan-1763910698890">'Zero gratitude from Ukraine...': Trump rants about 'inherited' Russia-Ukraine war, slams Europe amid talks on peace plan</a><h2>Will there be peace by Thanksgiving?</h2>Despite Trump's claims of “big progress”, obstacles remain. The issues of territorial disputes, reliable security guarantees, and the looming Thanksgiving deadline are difficult to reconcile. Continuing Russian military advances in contested areas and the drone and missile strikes on Kyiv underscore Moscow’s leverage on the ground. European leaders are following the UAE negotiations closely, engaging virtually and urging a “just and lasting peace” without compromising Ukrainian sovereignty.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-team-secretly-negotiating-ukraine-peace-deal-with-russia-1763541506148/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-team-secretly-negotiating-ukraine-peace-deal-with-russia-1763541506148/embed</a>Analysts suggest that a full, formal agreement by Thanksgiving is unlikely. Yet, to satisfy Trump’s demand and show momentum, some form of interim deal — possibly a ceasefire through to Christmas — could be on the table. It is increasingly likely that Zelensky may need to engage directly again with Trump to negotiate the most sensitive issues, particularly territory, even though there is no public confirmation from the White House about any such meetings.Meanwhile, the war continues. The overnight Russian attack on Kyiv reportedly involved more than 460 drones and 22 missiles and hit infrastructure and energy systems.&nbsp;

American and Russian officials are meeting in Abu Dhabi as Trump's Thanksgiving deadline to end the Russia-Ukraine war looms. Two peace plans are on offer: from US and EU. And Russia is continuing to pound Kyiv. Will there be peace?

American and Russian officials are holding secret negotiations in Abu Dhabi on Tuesday (Nov 25) for peace in Ukraine, even as Moscow's deadly overnight strike on Kyiv killed at least six people. The meetings in the UAE come as US President Donald Trump set a Thanksgiving Day deadline for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to accept a peace plan. The Wednesday deadline followed the leak of a US 28‑point peace proposal that has sparked strong criticism. Over the weekend, European leaders put forward an alternative during talks in Geneva, and Zelensky is reportedly making adjustments to the US-drafted plan to better reflect Ukraine’s security priorities. Here is what is known, based on reports. What is Zelensky doing to the Ukraine peace plan? President Zelensky and his advisers are reportedly pushing to refine the US proposal in a way that preserves Ukraine’s sovereignty and avoids any sense of capitulation to Moscow. The original US draft would have asked Ukraine to cede some Russian-occupied territories, cap its army at 600,000 troops, and renounce future NATO membership ambitions. That version was strongly criticised in Kyiv and by European governments as favouring Russia. Zelensky is pressing for stronger security guarantees and safeguards, despite pressure from Washington to move fast on the peace effort. The European counter‑proposal, emerging from Geneva, omitted outright pro-Russian concessions and instead envisaged freezing the current front line for future territorial negotiations. It also includes NATO-style security assurances for Ukraine — a formula Kyiv is said to be weighing seriously alongside the US draft. Also read: Russia-Ukraine war: Europe's peace plan 'leaks'. How similar or different is it from leaked US plan? Who are attending the UAE crunch talks? The Abu Dhabi talks are being led on the American side by US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll. Also involved are Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. A Russian delegation is present, though names have not been publicly announced. According to some reports, Ukraine’s military intelligence chief, Kyrylo Budanov, is participating separately, focusing specifically on security guarantees. This marks the first direct US-Russia diplomatic engagement on Ukraine since Trump pushed for a rapid-resolution plan. The US proposal has reportedly been slimmed down from 28 to around 19 points, aiming to concentrate on key issues such as territorial concessions and military limits, while preserving core American demands. Russia has described the plan as a “good basis,” but continues to insist that Ukraine remain politically and militarily subordinate. Meanwhile, Ukraine is demanding enforceable NATO-style protections and refuses to give up land. Also read: 'Zero gratitude from Ukraine...': Trump rants about 'inherited' Russia-Ukraine war, slams Europe amid talks on peace plan Will there be peace by Thanksgiving? Despite Trump's claims of “big progress”, obstacles remain. The issues of territorial disputes, reliable security guarantees, and the looming Thanksgiving deadline are difficult to reconcile. Continuing Russian military advances in contested areas and the drone and missile strikes on Kyiv underscore Moscow’s leverage on the ground. European leaders are following the UAE negotiations closely, engaging virtually and urging a “just and lasting peace” without compromising Ukrainian sovereignty. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-team-secretly-negotiating-ukraine-peace-deal-with-russia-1763541506148/embed Analysts suggest that a full, formal agreement by Thanksgiving is unlikely. Yet, to satisfy Trump’s demand and show momentum, some form of interim deal — possibly a ceasefire through to Christmas — could be on the table. It is increasingly likely that Zelensky may need to engage directly again with Trump to negotiate the most sensitive issues, particularly territory, even though there is no public confirmation from the White House about any such meetings. Meanwhile, the war continues. The overnight Russian attack on Kyiv reportedly involved more than 460 drones and 22 missiles and hit infrastructure and energy systems.

American and Russian officials are meeting in Abu Dhabi as Trump's Thanksgiving deadline to end the Russia-Ukraine war looms. Two peace plans are on offer: from US and EU. And Russia is continuing to pound Kyiv. Will there be peace?

Will there be peace in Ukraine? Crunch talks in UAE ahead of Trump’s Thanksgiving deadline as overnight Russian strikes on Kyiv kill 6

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed on Tuesday (Nov 25) that Russia launched 22 missiles and more than 460 drones into Ukraine overnight, in which six people were killed, and 12 were injured. Zelensky said the strikes caused “extensive damage to residential buildings and civilian infrastructure” in Kyiv.&nbsp;“There is also destruction in the Odesa region – the ports, food supplies, and infrastructure were hit, with no military purpose whatsoever," the Ukrainian president wrote on social media.&nbsp;“The primary targets were the energy sector and everything that keeps normal life going," Zelensky added, saying that Russia also struck Dnipro, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, and Cherkasy regions.&nbsp;“What matters most now is that all partners move toward diplomacy together,” he said.Meanwhile, a senior Ukrainian official said that Zelensky could visit the US in the next few days to finalise a peace deal. “We look forward to organizing a visit of Ukraine’s President to the US at the earliest suitable date in November to complete final steps and make a deal with President Trump,” Rustem Umerov, Ukraine’s national security chief, wrote on social media.&nbsp;Where does peace plan stand?&nbsp;Russia's former director at the National Security Council said on Monday (Nov 24) that the peace plan proposed by US President Donald Trump in the Russia-Ukraine war has certain parts that Moscow "certainly would not agree to". He said that Russia has “every incentive” to drag out the negotiation process.&nbsp;“There are elements of this the Russians certainly won’t agree to. There are elements the Ukrainians won’t agree to. But the Russians have every incentive to play this along,” Jeffrey Edmonds, former director for Russia at the National Security Council, told CNN. “There’s no incentive for them to actually agree to this, but there’s every incentive for them to drag it along,” he said.&nbsp;"You have to change the Kremlin’s calculus on whether or not they can achieve their goals in Ukraine … That is the only thing that’s ultimately going to bring them to the table," he said when he was asked what could push Russia toward some form of peace agreement. &nbsp;

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed on Tuesday (Nov 25) that Russia launched 22 missiles and more than 460 drones into Ukraine overnight, in which six people were killed, and 12 were injured. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed on Tuesday (Nov 25) that Russia launched 22 missiles and more than 460 drones into Ukraine overnight, in which six people were killed, and 12 were injured. Zelensky said the strikes caused “extensive damage to residential buildings and civilian infrastructure” in Kyiv. “There is also destruction in the Odesa region – the ports, food supplies, and infrastructure were hit, with no military purpose whatsoever," the Ukrainian president wrote on social media. “The primary targets were the energy sector and everything that keeps normal life going," Zelensky added, saying that Russia also struck Dnipro, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, and Cherkasy regions. “What matters most now is that all partners move toward diplomacy together,” he said. Meanwhile, a senior Ukrainian official said that Zelensky could visit the US in the next few days to finalise a peace deal. “We look forward to organizing a visit of Ukraine’s President to the US at the earliest suitable date in November to complete final steps and make a deal with President Trump,” Rustem Umerov, Ukraine’s national security chief, wrote on social media. Where does peace plan stand? Russia's former director at the National Security Council said on Monday (Nov 24) that the peace plan proposed by US President Donald Trump in the Russia-Ukraine war has certain parts that Moscow "certainly would not agree to". He said that Russia has “every incentive” to drag out the negotiation process. “There are elements of this the Russians certainly won’t agree to. There are elements the Ukrainians won’t agree to. But the Russians have every incentive to play this along,” Jeffrey Edmonds, former director for Russia at the National Security Council, told CNN. “There’s no incentive for them to actually agree to this, but there’s every incentive for them to drag it along,” he said. "You have to change the Kremlin’s calculus on whether or not they can achieve their goals in Ukraine … That is the only thing that’s ultimately going to bring them to the table," he said when he was asked what could push Russia toward some form of peace agreement.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed on Tuesday (Nov 25) that Russia launched 22 missiles and more than 460 drones into Ukraine overnight, in which six people were killed, and 12 were injured.&nbsp;

Russian strikes kill 6, wound 13 in overnight attack, says Zelensky. Details inside

Temple workers in Thailand got the fright of their lives when a woman they believed was dead started moving inside her coffin. The staff at Wat Rat Prakhong Tham, a Buddhist temple in Nonthaburi just outside Bangkok, were preparing for the cremation of an unnamed woman when the supposedly deceased person came back from the dead. Here's what happened.<h2>Back from the dead</h2>According to a SCMP report citing Pairat Soodthoop, the general and financial affairs manager of Wat Rat Prakhong Tham, the temple staff had prepared for a routine cremation when the shocking incident happened. A video on the temple's Facebook page shows a 65-year-old woman who looked pale and still in a plain white coffin. Her family had already said their goodbyes. Nothing seemed unusual. Then the coffin moved.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/home-the-deadliest-place-shocking-un-report-shows-every-10-mins-a-woman-is-murdered-by-family-or-partners-femicide-1764045604135">Home the deadliest place? Shocking UN report shows every 10 mins, a woman is murdered by family or partners</a>Soodthoop, said the first sign was a soft knock from inside the box. At first, he thought he had imagined it. But then it came again. He told the family to open the coffin, just to be sure. “I was a bit surprised, so I asked them to open the coffin, and everyone was startled,” he recalled. “I saw her opening her eyes slightly and knocking on the side of the coffin. She must have been knocking for quite some time.” The moment the lid was lifted, it became clear that she had been trying to get attention for a while, trapped in the darkness and silence.<h2>How did the family assume she was dead?</h2>Her brother, who had driven more than 500 kilometres from Phitsanulok province, explained that she had been bedridden for two years. Her condition had recently worsened until she stopped responding altogether. After she appeared to stop breathing for two days, the family assumed the worst.He had planned to take her body to a hospital in Bangkok, because she once said she wanted to donate her organs. But without a death certificate, the hospital refused to accept her. The brother then turned to the temple, which offers free cremations for those who cannot afford them. Again, he was told that the proper paperwork was needed.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/chinese-man-with-pakistan-travel-history-caught-filming-sensitive-sites-after-sneaking-into-india-from-nepal-1764036527773">Chinese man with Pakistan travel history caught filming sensitive sites after sneaking into India from Nepal</a>While Pairat was explaining the process of getting an official confirmation of death, the knock that changed everything sounded from inside the coffin. Temple staff rushed the woman to a nearby hospital. The abbot later said the temple would cover her medical expenses.

A Thai temple was preparing to cremate a 65-year-old woman believed dead when she suddenly knocked from inside her coffin. Scroll for full story.

Temple workers in Thailand got the fright of their lives when a woman they believed was dead started moving inside her coffin. The staff at Wat Rat Prakhong Tham, a Buddhist temple in Nonthaburi just outside Bangkok, were preparing for the cremation of an unnamed woman when the supposedly deceased person came back from the dead. Here's what happened. Back from the dead According to a SCMP report citing Pairat Soodthoop, the general and financial affairs manager of Wat Rat Prakhong Tham, the temple staff had prepared for a routine cremation when the shocking incident happened. A video on the temple's Facebook page shows a 65-year-old woman who looked pale and still in a plain white coffin. Her family had already said their goodbyes. Nothing seemed unusual. Then the coffin moved. Also read | Home the deadliest place? Shocking UN report shows every 10 mins, a woman is murdered by family or partners Soodthoop, said the first sign was a soft knock from inside the box. At first, he thought he had imagined it. But then it came again. He told the family to open the coffin, just to be sure. “I was a bit surprised, so I asked them to open the coffin, and everyone was startled,” he recalled. “I saw her opening her eyes slightly and knocking on the side of the coffin. She must have been knocking for quite some time.” The moment the lid was lifted, it became clear that she had been trying to get attention for a while, trapped in the darkness and silence. How did the family assume she was dead? Her brother, who had driven more than 500 kilometres from Phitsanulok province, explained that she had been bedridden for two years. Her condition had recently worsened until she stopped responding altogether. After she appeared to stop breathing for two days, the family assumed the worst. He had planned to take her body to a hospital in Bangkok, because she once said she wanted to donate her organs. But without a death certificate, the hospital refused to accept her. The brother then turned to the temple, which offers free cremations for those who cannot afford them. Again, he was told that the proper paperwork was needed. Also read | Chinese man with Pakistan travel history caught filming sensitive sites after sneaking into India from Nepal While Pairat was explaining the process of getting an official confirmation of death, the knock that changed everything sounded from inside the coffin. Temple staff rushed the woman to a nearby hospital. The abbot later said the temple would cover her medical expenses.

A Thai temple was preparing to cremate a 65-year-old woman believed dead when she suddenly knocked from inside her coffin. Scroll for full story.

Back from the dead! Thai woman wakes up knocking inside her coffin on way to cremation

The US military said on Monday it was weighing a court-martial against Democratic senator and former astronaut Mark Kelly for appearing in a video urging troops to refuse unlawful orders. The Pentagon's probe marks an extraordinary escalation in the Trump administration's backlash against six Democrats with military or intelligence service backgrounds who made the viral video.&nbsp;Kelly -- a decorated Navy combat pilot and former astronaut who commanded the Space Shuttle Endeavour's final flight -- fired back that he would not be intimidated or “silenced by bullies.” The Pentagon had threatened to recall the Arizona senator back to active duty in order to face a court-martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.Officials indicated that Kelly may have undermined the "loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces," citing laws barring interference in military cohesion.It is highly unusual for the Pentagon -- long allergic to overt politics until President Donald Trump's return to power this year -- to publicly threaten a sitting member of Congress.The video posted on Friday called on the military to "refuse illegal orders" and featured Kelly alongside Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin and four members of the US House of Representatives.Trump initially accused the group of "seditious behavior, punishable by death."Over the weekend, he wrote in an all-caps social media rant that the "traitors" who told troops to disobey him "should be in jail."&nbsp;&nbsp;The Democrats did not specify which orders they meant, but Trump has ordered the National Guard into multiple US cities -- often against local objections -- to curb what he calls rampant unrest. Overseas, Trump has ordered strikes on alleged drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean that killed more than 80 people and which experts say are illegal.&nbsp;Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth branded the Democrats the "Seditious Six" and called their video “despicable, reckless, and false.” He accused Kelly of bringing "discredit" on the armed forces, saying his remarks were addressed directly at troops while invoking his rank -- giving them an air of authority.But analysts and Kelly's supporters warned the move could backfire by elevating him ahead of a potential 2028 presidential run.Kelly posted a photo of his many military medals, and recapped his Navy and NASA career."If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won't work," he said."I've given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies who care more about their own power than protecting the Constitution."In a blistering, expletive-laced video, fellow Arizona senator Ruben Gallego, an Iraq War veteran, called the Pentagon announcement "insane" and suggested Hegseth and others were "acting like fascists.""Mark Kelly is a patriot. There's no reason why they're going after him," he said. "He was doing his duty and just reminding people about their rights as service members."

The Pentagon is weighing a court-martial against Senator Mark Kelly after he appeared in a video urging troops to reject illegal orders, prompting harsh attacks from President Trump. Kelly called the move intimidation, while critics warn the unprecedented action could politically backfire.

The US military said on Monday it was weighing a court-martial against Democratic senator and former astronaut Mark Kelly for appearing in a video urging troops to refuse unlawful orders. The Pentagon's probe marks an extraordinary escalation in the Trump administration's backlash against six Democrats with military or intelligence service backgrounds who made the viral video. Kelly -- a decorated Navy combat pilot and former astronaut who commanded the Space Shuttle Endeavour's final flight -- fired back that he would not be intimidated or “silenced by bullies.” The Pentagon had threatened to recall the Arizona senator back to active duty in order to face a court-martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Officials indicated that Kelly may have undermined the "loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces," citing laws barring interference in military cohesion. It is highly unusual for the Pentagon -- long allergic to overt politics until President Donald Trump's return to power this year -- to publicly threaten a sitting member of Congress. The video posted on Friday called on the military to "refuse illegal orders" and featured Kelly alongside Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin and four members of the US House of Representatives. Trump initially accused the group of "seditious behavior, punishable by death." Over the weekend, he wrote in an all-caps social media rant that the "traitors" who told troops to disobey him "should be in jail." The Democrats did not specify which orders they meant, but Trump has ordered the National Guard into multiple US cities -- often against local objections -- to curb what he calls rampant unrest. Overseas, Trump has ordered strikes on alleged drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean that killed more than 80 people and which experts say are illegal. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth branded the Democrats the "Seditious Six" and called their video “despicable, reckless, and false.” He accused Kelly of bringing "discredit" on the armed forces, saying his remarks were addressed directly at troops while invoking his rank -- giving them an air of authority. But analysts and Kelly's supporters warned the move could backfire by elevating him ahead of a potential 2028 presidential run. Kelly posted a photo of his many military medals, and recapped his Navy and NASA career. "If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won't work," he said. "I've given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies who care more about their own power than protecting the Constitution." In a blistering, expletive-laced video, fellow Arizona senator Ruben Gallego, an Iraq War veteran, called the Pentagon announcement "insane" and suggested Hegseth and others were "acting like fascists." "Mark Kelly is a patriot. There's no reason why they're going after him," he said. "He was doing his duty and just reminding people about their rights as service members."

The Pentagon is weighing a court-martial against Senator Mark Kelly after he appeared in a video urging troops to reject illegal orders, prompting harsh attacks from President Trump. Kelly called the move intimidation, while critics warn the unprecedented action could politically backfire.

Why is Pentagon investigating Senator Mark Kelly after Trump's call for death punishment

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has finally broken the silence following reports suggesting that the agency had been dissolved eight months before its contract ended. Rejecting the claim, the DOGE called the report “fake news”, saying that it will be back in a few days with its “regularly scheduled Friday update”. This comes after a report surfaced citing a US official saying the department, which carried out a campaign of slashing government spending and firing thousands of federal employees, “doesn’t exist”.Reuters reported, citing Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor, that DOGE was no longer a “centralised entity”. When asked about the agency’s status, Kupor said, “That doesn’t exist.”Slamming the report, DOGE responded on X, “As usual, this is fake news from Reuters.”Defending its existence, the agency further claimed that it terminated 78 “wasteful contracts” last week and saved taxpayers $335 million.“President Trump was given a mandate by the American people to modernize the federal government and reduce waste, fraud and abuse. Just last week, DOGE terminated 78 wasteful contracts and saved taxpayers $335M,” it wrote. “We’ll be back in a few days with our regularly scheduled Friday update.”DOGE was set up in January and was tasked to shrink the federal agencies rapidly, cut their budgets or redirect their work to priorities as per the US President. OPM, the federal government’s human resources office, has taken over many functions of DOGE, as per Kupor and Reuters reports citing documents.The suspicions that DOGE may have been disbanded started to rise when Politico reported in June that staffers had “packed up their clothes and bedding” at the department’s headquarters, where they had been living since February. The report added that they were looking for new homes.The rehousing came shortly after a dramatic feud between Trump and Musk on social media, when many former employees were reportedly worried about criminal repercussions associated with their role in DOGE programs. Moreover, several DOGE staff have taken on other roles across government.

Slamming the report, DOGE responded on X, “As usual, this is fake news from Reuters.”

Defending its existence, the agency further claimed that it terminated 78 “wasteful contracts” last week and saved taxpayers $335 million.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has finally broken the silence following reports suggesting that the agency had been dissolved eight months before its contract ended. Rejecting the claim, the DOGE called the report “fake news”, saying that it will be back in a few days with its “regularly scheduled Friday update”. This comes after a report surfaced citing a US official saying the department, which carried out a campaign of slashing government spending and firing thousands of federal employees, “doesn’t exist”. Reuters reported, citing Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor, that DOGE was no longer a “centralised entity”. When asked about the agency’s status, Kupor said, “That doesn’t exist.” Slamming the report, DOGE responded on X, “As usual, this is fake news from Reuters.” Defending its existence, the agency further claimed that it terminated 78 “wasteful contracts” last week and saved taxpayers $335 million. “President Trump was given a mandate by the American people to modernize the federal government and reduce waste, fraud and abuse. Just last week, DOGE terminated 78 wasteful contracts and saved taxpayers $335M,” it wrote. “We’ll be back in a few days with our regularly scheduled Friday update.” DOGE was set up in January and was tasked to shrink the federal agencies rapidly, cut their budgets or redirect their work to priorities as per the US President. OPM, the federal government’s human resources office, has taken over many functions of DOGE, as per Kupor and Reuters reports citing documents. The suspicions that DOGE may have been disbanded started to rise when Politico reported in June that staffers had “packed up their clothes and bedding” at the department’s headquarters, where they had been living since February. The report added that they were looking for new homes. The rehousing came shortly after a dramatic feud between Trump and Musk on social media, when many former employees were reportedly worried about criminal repercussions associated with their role in DOGE programs. Moreover, several DOGE staff have taken on other roles across government.

Slamming the report, DOGE responded on X, “As usual, this is fake news from Reuters.” Defending its existence, the agency further claimed that it terminated 78 “wasteful contracts” last week and saved taxpayers $335 million.

‘We’ll be back in…’: DOGE finally breaks silence on claims it ‘doesn’t exist’

A report by the Axios website on Monday (Nov 24) implied that Cuba would kill Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro if he flees amid a possible direct military action by the US against the Latin American nation. The report is largely based on unnamed intelligence sources. This could be one of the many attempts by the American media to put pressure on the Venezuelan government as the US attempts a regime change, through ‘Operation Southern Spear’, a massive military buildup cloaked as a counternarcotics operation. But it is important to examine why Cuba would want to kill Maduro if he reaches some kind of understanding with US President Donald Trump and exits the regime or flees Venezuela. The short answer, it appears, is that Venezuela, or more specifically its oil, is the lifeline for Cuba. For a longer answer, read below.<h2>What are the claims made in the Axios article?</h2>The article claimed that Cuba might kill Maduro if he attempts to negotiate with Trump. The report almost entirely cited anonymous US administration officials. This is not confirmed intelligence, but a perceived risk that can complicate the Trump administration’s Venezuela strategy, amid reports that the US leader and Maduro could hold a phone conversation. At the time of writing this, there is no public evidence to suggest that Cuba has threatened Maduro, or planned to act against him.The Axios report, titled Scoop: Trump ready to talk with Maduro over Venezuela drug strikes, is in the context of Trump’s escalating pressure campaign on Maduro, with Operation Southern Spear targeting alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean.According to the officials cited in the report, a possible hindrance to Maduro stepping down voluntarily would be a fear that his Cuban ‘handlers’ might retaliate violently if he attempted to flee or cooperate with the US. The report said: “Part of the challenge of persuading Maduro to leave, US officials say, is that his Cuban handlers might execute him if he yields to American pressure and quits.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/xi-jinping-backs-nicolas-maduro-blasts-us-meddling-as-warships-circle-venezuela-1764051446049">Xi Jinping backs Nicolas Maduro, blasts US meddling as warships circle Venezuela, vows to protect Caracas' sovereignty</a><h2>What could be Cuba’s potential motive to eliminate Maduro if he exits the Venezuelan regime?</h2>The report appeared to suggest that Cuba's motive would stem from its deep economic reliance on the Venezuelan regime. For more than 20 years, Venezuela has supplied subsidised oil to Cuba, which is a crucial economic support for the Communist regime. Cuba reportedly gets 53 million barrels of oil from Venezuela annually at preferential rates, valued at approximately 4 billion US dollars per year. This oil supply has been central to keeping the Cuban economy afloat, particularly during periods of economic crisis. Cuba, in return, has embedded intelligence personnel within Venezuelan institutions, including internal security advisors and even participating in Maduro’s protective personal security detail.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nicolas-maduro-dances-to-try-reduce-us-venezuela-tensions-1764054501742/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/nicolas-maduro-dances-to-try-reduce-us-venezuela-tensions-1764054501742/embed</a>If Maduro defected or pursued a deal with Trump, it could jeopardise Cuba’s economic survival and expose its covert networks inside Venezuela. Cuba might act to prevent Maduro from abandoning the Chavista system.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-no-crazy-war-never-war-venezuelan-president-maduro-dances-to-remix-of-his-own-speech-internet-reacts-watch-1763992347774">'No war, yes peace': Venezuelan President Maduro dances to remix of his own speech – WATCH</a><h2>What is the Chavista system? The socialist bonhomie between Cuba and Venezuela</h2>Since the presidency of late Hugo Chávez in 1999, Cuba and Venezuela have had a close ideological and economic alliance. Chávez established the Chavista system, a socialist governance model inspired by Cuba. The system preferred state control over key industries like oil, and regional cooperation with like-minded nations like Cuba. Part of this is the Alba alliance, by which Venezuela gives oil subsidies to Cuba in exchange for Cuban personnel supporting health, education, and security projects in Venezuela. Since the time of Chávez, Cuban intelligence operatives, security advisers, and even personal guards for Chávez and later Maduro have been embedded in Venezuela. This network helps reinforce both regimes’ political stability. The Chavista system represents both ideological solidarity and tangible economic interdependence between the two nations. The Axios report implies that a threat to this system could make Cuba act against Maduro.

Axios website has reported that US officials fear Cuba could harm Maduro if he negotiates with Trump. The reasons have to do with Venezuela’s oil and the deep security and intelligence ties between Cuba and Venezuela.


A report by the Axios website on Monday (Nov 24) implied that Cuba would kill Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro if he flees amid a possible direct military action by the US against the Latin American nation. The report is largely based on unnamed intelligence sources. This could be one of the many attempts by the American media to put pressure on the Venezuelan government as the US attempts a regime change, through ‘Operation Southern Spear’, a massive military buildup cloaked as a counternarcotics operation. But it is important to examine why Cuba would want to kill Maduro if he reaches some kind of understanding with US President Donald Trump and exits the regime or flees Venezuela. The short answer, it appears, is that Venezuela, or more specifically its oil, is the lifeline for Cuba. For a longer answer, read below. What are the claims made in the Axios article? The article claimed that Cuba might kill Maduro if he attempts to negotiate with Trump. The report almost entirely cited anonymous US administration officials. This is not confirmed intelligence, but a perceived risk that can complicate the Trump administration’s Venezuela strategy, amid reports that the US leader and Maduro could hold a phone conversation. At the time of writing this, there is no public evidence to suggest that Cuba has threatened Maduro, or planned to act against him. The Axios report, titled Scoop: Trump ready to talk with Maduro over Venezuela drug strikes, is in the context of Trump’s escalating pressure campaign on Maduro, with Operation Southern Spear targeting alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean. According to the officials cited in the report, a possible hindrance to Maduro stepping down voluntarily would be a fear that his Cuban ‘handlers’ might retaliate violently if he attempted to flee or cooperate with the US. The report said: “Part of the challenge of persuading Maduro to leave, US officials say, is that his Cuban handlers might execute him if he yields to American pressure and quits.” Also read: Xi Jinping backs Nicolas Maduro, blasts US meddling as warships circle Venezuela, vows to protect Caracas' sovereignty What could be Cuba’s potential motive to eliminate Maduro if he exits the Venezuelan regime? The report appeared to suggest that Cuba's motive would stem from its deep economic reliance on the Venezuelan regime. For more than 20 years, Venezuela has supplied subsidised oil to Cuba, which is a crucial economic support for the Communist regime. Cuba reportedly gets 53 million barrels of oil from Venezuela annually at preferential rates, valued at approximately 4 billion US dollars per year. This oil supply has been central to keeping the Cuban economy afloat, particularly during periods of economic crisis. Cuba, in return, has embedded intelligence personnel within Venezuelan institutions, including internal security advisors and even participating in Maduro’s protective personal security detail. https://www.wionews.com/videos/nicolas-maduro-dances-to-try-reduce-us-venezuela-tensions-1764054501742/embed If Maduro defected or pursued a deal with Trump, it could jeopardise Cuba’s economic survival and expose its covert networks inside Venezuela. Cuba might act to prevent Maduro from abandoning the Chavista system. Also read: 'No war, yes peace': Venezuelan President Maduro dances to remix of his own speech – WATCH What is the Chavista system? The socialist bonhomie between Cuba and Venezuela Since the presidency of late Hugo Chávez in 1999, Cuba and Venezuela have had a close ideological and economic alliance. Chávez established the Chavista system, a socialist governance model inspired by Cuba. The system preferred state control over key industries like oil, and regional cooperation with like-minded nations like Cuba. Part of this is the Alba alliance, by which Venezuela gives oil subsidies to Cuba in exchange for Cuban personnel supporting health, education, and security projects in Venezuela. Since the time of Chávez, Cuban intelligence operatives, security advisers, and even personal guards for Chávez and later Maduro have been embedded in Venezuela. This network helps reinforce both regimes’ political stability. The Chavista system represents both ideological solidarity and tangible economic interdependence between the two nations. The Axios report implies that a threat to this system could make Cuba act against Maduro.

Axios website has reported that US officials fear Cuba could harm Maduro if he negotiates with Trump. The reasons possibly have to do with Venezuela’s oil and the deep security and intelligence ties between Cuba and Venezuela. &nbsp;

Why would Cuba want to kill Maduro? A report claims that could happen if...

Bangladesh's High Commissioner to India, Riaz Hamidullah, has used the occasion of Bangladesh Armed Forces Day to pay tribute to the sacrifices made by both countries during the 1971 Liberation War and to underline the enduring strength of bilateral ties. Speaking at a reception at the Bangladesh High Commission in Delhi on Monday evening, envoy Hamidullah marked the day the Bangladesh Army, Navy and Air Force formally came into being. "On this (21st November) day in 1971, Army, Navy and Air Force together formed the armed forces of Bangladesh and launched a well-coordinated attack along with the mass against the occupying Pakistani military," he said. "Their concerted efforts contributed to the final push in the attainment of victory in our war of liberation." India was represented at the celebrations by Director General Military Operations of the Indian Army, Lt General Manish Luthra. Delhi's diplomatic community, war veterans of the Bangladesh liberation war, were also present. The High Commissioner paid respects to Bangladesh's freedom fighters and victims of the war, but also explicitly acknowledged India's role. "I do recall the valued contributions of the 1,668 Indian soldiers who made the supreme sacrifice during the 1971 war," he said. "I acknowledge the surviving war veterans of India. No less should we pay homage to countless ordinary women, men, and families in India, especially in Tripura and West Bengal, who endured so much and shared millions of Bangladesh's agony during the war." Mr Hamidullah described Bangladesh-India relations as "deep and multi-layered", bound by "shared history, shared culture, shared geography". "Our two people are tied just organically," he said. "It's a relationship that's embedded in mutual respect and trust, not to be driven by zero-sum game." He noted that challenges had arisen over the years but stressed Dhaka's preference for dialogue. "Bangladesh has consistently relied on conversation and negotiation, driven by pragmatism and believing in a shared future," he said. "It's not a cliché. It is what I and my colleagues across India believe and engage in practically, to secure peace, stability and prosperity in Bangladesh and India." Eight months into his posting, the envoy highlighted growing military cooperation. "I do note with satisfaction the multifaceted cooperation between the armed forces of Bangladesh and India, in very many forms of interactions and exchanges, at various levels," he said. "These engagements ought to continue and flourish, to the mutual benefit of our people." Mr Hamidullah also praised Bangladesh's peacekeepers, saying 168 had lost their lives in UN operations, and noted that troops were currently assisting civilian authorities ahead of general elections expected in early 2026.

Speaking at a reception at the Bangladesh High Commission in Delhi on Monday evening, envoy Hamidullah marked the day the Bangladesh Army, Navy and Air Force formally came into being.

Bangladesh's High Commissioner to India, Riaz Hamidullah, has used the occasion of Bangladesh Armed Forces Day to pay tribute to the sacrifices made by both countries during the 1971 Liberation War and to underline the enduring strength of bilateral ties. Speaking at a reception at the Bangladesh High Commission in Delhi on Monday evening, envoy Hamidullah marked the day the Bangladesh Army, Navy and Air Force formally came into being. "On this (21st November) day in 1971, Army, Navy and Air Force together formed the armed forces of Bangladesh and launched a well-coordinated attack along with the mass against the occupying Pakistani military," he said. "Their concerted efforts contributed to the final push in the attainment of victory in our war of liberation." India was represented at the celebrations by Director General Military Operations of the Indian Army, Lt General Manish Luthra. Delhi's diplomatic community, war veterans of the Bangladesh liberation war, were also present. The High Commissioner paid respects to Bangladesh's freedom fighters and victims of the war, but also explicitly acknowledged India's role. "I do recall the valued contributions of the 1,668 Indian soldiers who made the supreme sacrifice during the 1971 war," he said. "I acknowledge the surviving war veterans of India. No less should we pay homage to countless ordinary women, men, and families in India, especially in Tripura and West Bengal, who endured so much and shared millions of Bangladesh's agony during the war." Mr Hamidullah described Bangladesh-India relations as "deep and multi-layered", bound by "shared history, shared culture, shared geography". "Our two people are tied just organically," he said. "It's a relationship that's embedded in mutual respect and trust, not to be driven by zero-sum game." He noted that challenges had arisen over the years but stressed Dhaka's preference for dialogue. "Bangladesh has consistently relied on conversation and negotiation, driven by pragmatism and believing in a shared future," he said. "It's not a cliché. It is what I and my colleagues across India believe and engage in practically, to secure peace, stability and prosperity in Bangladesh and India." Eight months into his posting, the envoy highlighted growing military cooperation. "I do note with satisfaction the multifaceted cooperation between the armed forces of Bangladesh and India, in very many forms of interactions and exchanges, at various levels," he said. "These engagements ought to continue and flourish, to the mutual benefit of our people." Mr Hamidullah also praised Bangladesh's peacekeepers, saying 168 had lost their lives in UN operations, and noted that troops were currently assisting civilian authorities ahead of general elections expected in early 2026.

Speaking at a reception at the Bangladesh High Commission in Delhi on Monday evening, envoy Hamidullah marked the day the Bangladesh Army, Navy and Air Force formally came into being.

Bangladesh-India ties: Dhaka envoy praises shared history on Armed Forces Day

A high-altitude cloud of volcanic ash from Ethiopia, which drifted into the Indian region on Monday afternoon, is likely to move completely into China by Tuesday evening. The ash originated on Sunday from a rare eruption of the Hayli Gubbi volcano in the northeastern part of Ethiopia, near the Red Sea coastline. Travelling at altitudes commonly used by long-haul aircraft, the cloud poses risks such as reduced visibility and potential exposure to toxic gases like sulphur dioxide.<h3>What is Hayli Gubbi's volcanic ash cloud?</h3>It is a massive airborne cloud made of fine, sharp particles of rock, minerals and volcanic glass which are formed during a volcanic eruption, resulting from the magma inside shattering into microscopic pieces. Hot gases propel these materials upwards, and winds disperse them similarly to dust from a construction site, but on a large scale and at extremely high altitudes. It results in the ashes remaining suspended for days or even weeks, travelling great distances with atmospheric currents.<h3>How does an ash cloud move?</h3>All the trapped gases in a volcano expand violently after it erupts suddenly and release pressure from the rising magma. The mounting pressure results in an explosion, which breaks the magma into tiny particles and shoots them high into the atmosphere, forming what is known as an 'eruption plume'. Such a plume can reach astonishing heights of 15–20 kilometres above the surface of the Earth. Later, the ash cloud was carried along by powerful winds after reaching the upper layers, which can move across continents and multiple regions.<h3>How Hayli Gubbi's volcanic ash cloud affects the environment</h3>One of the powerful impacts of the ash cloud is that it can pose a major hazard to jet engines, as it can melt and solidify on turbine blades, causing engine failure and disrupting air travel. The next impact is the rise of SO2 levels in the air, affecting higher altitude regions, such as the Himalayas and Nepal, as it can irritate the respiratory system.&nbsp;It also makes the skies appear darker and hazier than usual in regions it passes over. In addition, the interaction between volcanic gases and moisture in the atmosphere could potentially lead to light acidic rainfall in affected regions.

The ash originated on Sunday from a rare eruption of the Hayli Gubbi volcano in the northeastern part of Ethiopia, near the Red Sea coastline, which poses risks such as reduced visibility and potential exposure to toxic gases like sulphur dioxide.

A high-altitude cloud of volcanic ash from Ethiopia, which drifted into the Indian region on Monday afternoon, is likely to move completely into China by Tuesday evening. The ash originated on Sunday from a rare eruption of the Hayli Gubbi volcano in the northeastern part of Ethiopia, near the Red Sea coastline. Travelling at altitudes commonly used by long-haul aircraft, the cloud poses risks such as reduced visibility and potential exposure to toxic gases like sulphur dioxide. What is Hayli Gubbi's volcanic ash cloud? It is a massive airborne cloud made of fine, sharp particles of rock, minerals and volcanic glass which are formed during a volcanic eruption, resulting from the magma inside shattering into microscopic pieces. Hot gases propel these materials upwards, and winds disperse them similarly to dust from a construction site, but on a large scale and at extremely high altitudes. It results in the ashes remaining suspended for days or even weeks, travelling great distances with atmospheric currents. How does an ash cloud move? All the trapped gases in a volcano expand violently after it erupts suddenly and release pressure from the rising magma. The mounting pressure results in an explosion, which breaks the magma into tiny particles and shoots them high into the atmosphere, forming what is known as an 'eruption plume'. Such a plume can reach astonishing heights of 15–20 kilometres above the surface of the Earth. Later, the ash cloud was carried along by powerful winds after reaching the upper layers, which can move across continents and multiple regions. How Hayli Gubbi's volcanic ash cloud affects the environment One of the powerful impacts of the ash cloud is that it can pose a major hazard to jet engines, as it can melt and solidify on turbine blades, causing engine failure and disrupting air travel. The next impact is the rise of SO2 levels in the air, affecting higher altitude regions, such as the Himalayas and Nepal, as it can irritate the respiratory system. It also makes the skies appear darker and hazier than usual in regions it passes over. In addition, the interaction between volcanic gases and moisture in the atmosphere could potentially lead to light acidic rainfall in affected regions.

The ash originated on Sunday from a rare eruption of the Hayli Gubbi volcano in the northeastern part of Ethiopia, near the Red Sea coastline, which poses risks such as reduced visibility and potential exposure to toxic gases like sulphur dioxide.

What is Hayli Gubbi's volcanic ash cloud? Know how it forms, travels and affects the environment

Anti-Indian slogans were chanted during ‘Khalistan Referendum’ organised by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), in Ottawa this Sunday. The Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a group banned in India under the UAPA for extremist activities, had announced the unauthorised referendum. Videos from the referendum day on social media showed several Khalistani supporters chanting anti-India slogans, , including calls to “kill” Indian leaders.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/canada-raises-alarm-over-khalistani-extremist-fundraising-1757136897926">Canada raises alarm over Khalistani extremist fundraising</a>&nbsp;Footage also showed presence of police officers during the event, but no action was taken against those chanting the slogans. Videos also showed these Khalistani supporters desecrating the Indian flag. SFJ claimed that over 53,000 Sikhs from Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec took part in the ‘Khalistan Referendum.’ SFJ’s general counsel Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, designated a terrorist by India, also addressed attendees via a satellite message.&nbsp;Indian High Commissioner to Canada Dinesh Patnaik reacted on the event an called it ‘farcical.’ He said that India does not object to people raising political demands. “You people know what a referendum is. You have done referendums in the past. You know how farcical this is. Referendums have a certain process. This is a referendum by Canadians done in Canada. If you want to do it, do it. The problem that happens is that back home in India they see this as Canadian interference in India as Canadians see anything as Indian interference in Canada. That's something Canada has to think about,” he said in an interview to CBC.<h2>Canada's move against 'Khalistani extremists'</h2>The Referendum took place just a day after Canadian PM Mark Carney met with Indian PM Narendra Modi at the G20 Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa. Earlier in June, Canada termed "Khalistani extremists" a national security threat for the country in a key intelligence report. In its annual report to Parliament, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service or CSIS said, "while there were no Canada-based Khalistani extremists (CBKEs)-related attacks in Canada in 2024, ongoing involvement in violent activities by CBKEs continues to pose a national security threat to Canada and Canadian interests". This was the first time that Canada used the term ‘extremists’ for Khalistanis. India has over the years expressed its concerns over Khalistani extremists getting space in Canada.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-pro-khalistan-jagmeet-singhs-poll-setback-pave-way-for-canada-to-take-action-against-khalistani-terrorism-9018259">Will pro-Khalistan Jagmeet Singh's poll setback pave way for Canada to take action against Khalistani terrorism?</a>&nbsp;In Sep 2025, Canada raised fresh concerns about Khalistani extremist groups operating within its borders, pointing out how they have been raising funds, including through the abuse of charitable organisations, to support violent activities. The warning, outlined in the Canadian Finance Ministry’s 2025 "Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks", highlights the challenge of Khalistani extremism and its implications for both domestic and international security.&nbsp;

Thousands of Canadian Sikhs joined an illegal “Khalistan Referendum” in Ottawa, where violent slogans and alleged flag desecration sparked outrage. SFJ claimed 53,000 participants as tensions rise despite India and Canada recently restarting diplomatic cooperation. 

Anti-Indian slogans were chanted during ‘Khalistan Referendum’ organised by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), in Ottawa this Sunday. The Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a group banned in India under the UAPA for extremist activities, had announced the unauthorised referendum. Videos from the referendum day on social media showed several Khalistani supporters chanting anti-India slogans, , including calls to “kill” Indian leaders. Also read: Canada raises alarm over Khalistani extremist fundraising Footage also showed presence of police officers during the event, but no action was taken against those chanting the slogans. Videos also showed these Khalistani supporters desecrating the Indian flag. SFJ claimed that over 53,000 Sikhs from Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec took part in the ‘Khalistan Referendum.’ SFJ’s general counsel Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, designated a terrorist by India, also addressed attendees via a satellite message. Indian High Commissioner to Canada Dinesh Patnaik reacted on the event an called it ‘farcical.’ He said that India does not object to people raising political demands. “You people know what a referendum is. You have done referendums in the past. You know how farcical this is. Referendums have a certain process. This is a referendum by Canadians done in Canada. If you want to do it, do it. The problem that happens is that back home in India they see this as Canadian interference in India as Canadians see anything as Indian interference in Canada. That's something Canada has to think about,” he said in an interview to CBC. Canada's move against 'Khalistani extremists' The Referendum took place just a day after Canadian PM Mark Carney met with Indian PM Narendra Modi at the G20 Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa. Earlier in June, Canada termed "Khalistani extremists" a national security threat for the country in a key intelligence report. In its annual report to Parliament, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service or CSIS said, "while there were no Canada-based Khalistani extremists (CBKEs)-related attacks in Canada in 2024, ongoing involvement in violent activities by CBKEs continues to pose a national security threat to Canada and Canadian interests". This was the first time that Canada used the term ‘extremists’ for Khalistanis. India has over the years expressed its concerns over Khalistani extremists getting space in Canada. Also read: Will pro-Khalistan Jagmeet Singh's poll setback pave way for Canada to take action against Khalistani terrorism? In Sep 2025, Canada raised fresh concerns about Khalistani extremist groups operating within its borders, pointing out how they have been raising funds, including through the abuse of charitable organisations, to support violent activities. The warning, outlined in the Canadian Finance Ministry’s 2025 "Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks", highlights the challenge of Khalistani extremism and its implications for both domestic and international security.

Thousands of Canadian Sikhs joined an illegal “Khalistan Referendum” in Ottawa, where violent slogans and alleged flag desecration sparked outrage. SFJ claimed 53,000 participants as tensions rise despite India and Canada recently restarting diplomatic cooperation.&nbsp;

'Glorifying suicide bombers...': Anti-India slogans raised in Canada, Tricolour desecrated - What happened in 'Khalistan Referendum' event?

Viola Fletcher was a young Black girl in 1921 when she witnessed the Tulsa race massacre, one of the darkest chapters of America’s racist past. The longest survivor of the massacre, Fletcher died at the age of 111 on Monday (Nov 24). She spent the last years of her life advocating for racial justice and civil rights, often sharing her first-hand experience of racism at Tulsa in the southern state of Oklahoma, which had a past of Black slavery. Her death is a moment for America to recall the atrocities of Tulsa a century later, and do some soul-searching, particularly in the current context of racial tensions involving both Black Americans and immigrant communities, from Latin America to Asia.<h2>Who was Viola Fletcher?</h2>Viola Ford Fletcher was the oldest known survivor of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. She was only seven years old when white mobs destroyed the Greenwood district, then the most prosperous Black community in the US, located in Oklahoma. Born in 1914 in Oklahoma, Fletcher lived with her family in Greenwood. Unlike many other parts of the country, Greenwood at the time was known as Black Wall Street, due to the proliferation of Black-owned businesses, homes and institutions in the area.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/indian-techie-shot-dead-in-california-by-us-police-techie-s-family-alleges-racism-wion-1758279913827/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/indian-techie-shot-dead-in-california-by-us-police-techie-s-family-alleges-racism-wion-1758279913827/embed</a><h2>Fletcher's memories of Tulsa and late-life activism</h2>In her retelling, Fletcher often shared how she woke up to chaos on 31 May 1921, seeing armed white men advancing, buildings burning, and planes overhead dropping explosives. As gun violence spread, Fletcher’s family fled the area even as their home and community were burned down. The family survived, though they never recovered what was lost.For decades, Fletcher lived quietly, working as a welder during World War II and later as a housekeeper. She did not speak much about Tulsa until much later. But since her late 90s, Fletcher became a leading voice for Tulsa survivors. At the age of 107, Fletcher testified before Congress in 2021 on the need for justice and reparations for the massacre. She asked America to remember what happened in Tulsa, and to deliver justice to survivors and descendants. She described the fear, the destruction and the lifelong losses caused by the massacre, seeking acknowledgement of the event as a state-enabled attack on a Black community. She met and engaged with civil rights groups, spoke at commemorations, and challenged leaders to confront the legacy of racial violence.She wrote a memoir titled Don’t Let Them Bury My Story to preserve her story and the memory of Tulsa, and joined a lawsuit seeking reparations. The case was dismissed by the courts, but Fletcher’s advocacy brought national attention to a suppressed chapter of America’s dark history.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-move-back-to-india-racist-attack-on-indian-man-in-toronto-canada-sparks-debate-online-1762338126370">‘Move back to India’: Racist attack on Indian man in Canada sparks debate online</a><h2>What happened in Tulsa?</h2>The trigger event happened on 30 May 1921, when Black teenager Dick Rowland was accused of assaulting a white elevator operator, which was later described as accidental and exaggerated. But the local newspapers, many of them owned by whites, inflamed the issue and even publicly urged a lynching of Blacks. During the hearing of the case, a white mob gathered at the courthouse, while armed Black residents arrived to defend Rowland. A confrontation broke out, and shots were fired.At the end of it, an estimated 300 people were killed, mostly Black residents of Greenwood. Some 1,200 homes and mostly Black businesses were burned down, and nearly 10,000 Black residents were left homeless. Many Black residents were detained and held in makeshift camps.The event shattered the success story and confidence of the Black community in the state.Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/black-lives-matter-mural-removed-washington-dc-trump-news-8843409"> One block from White House, Black Lives Matter Plaza 'dismantled'</a><h2>What were the reasons for Tulsa massacre?</h2>The Tulsa massacre was the culmination of years of deep resentment among whites about Greenwood’s success story and long-standing racial hostility in Oklahoma.When Oklahoma became the 46th state of the US in the year 1907, it had racial segregation laws in place. This led to years of racial conflict and white vigilantism, mostly motivated by resentment at Black prosperity. This charged atmosphere eventually resulted in the Tulsa massacre.The massacre was seen as the extent to which white authorities and mobs would go in order to suppress Black advancement in the US.&nbsp;For many years, there was a state-led suppression of the real incidents, damage and cost of Tulsa.The massacre is an example of historical neglect too, as many governments did not allow for a full report of the atrocities.With Fletcher’s passing, the responsibility to protect that memory now rests entirely with the current and future governments.

Viola Fletcher’s passing closes a living link to the 1921 massacre. In the current American reality of racial tensions, this would be a good time for a new look at violence and justice in the US.



Viola Fletcher was a young Black girl in 1921 when she witnessed the Tulsa race massacre, one of the darkest chapters of America’s racist past. The longest survivor of the massacre, Fletcher died at the age of 111 on Monday (Nov 24). She spent the last years of her life advocating for racial justice and civil rights, often sharing her first-hand experience of racism at Tulsa in the southern state of Oklahoma, which had a past of Black slavery. Her death is a moment for America to recall the atrocities of Tulsa a century later, and do some soul-searching, particularly in the current context of racial tensions involving both Black Americans and immigrant communities, from Latin America to Asia. Who was Viola Fletcher? Viola Ford Fletcher was the oldest known survivor of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. She was only seven years old when white mobs destroyed the Greenwood district, then the most prosperous Black community in the US, located in Oklahoma. Born in 1914 in Oklahoma, Fletcher lived with her family in Greenwood. Unlike many other parts of the country, Greenwood at the time was known as Black Wall Street, due to the proliferation of Black-owned businesses, homes and institutions in the area. https://www.wionews.com/videos/indian-techie-shot-dead-in-california-by-us-police-techie-s-family-alleges-racism-wion-1758279913827/embed Fletcher's memories of Tulsa and late-life activism In her retelling, Fletcher often shared how she woke up to chaos on 31 May 1921, seeing armed white men advancing, buildings burning, and planes overhead dropping explosives. As gun violence spread, Fletcher’s family fled the area even as their home and community were burned down. The family survived, though they never recovered what was lost. For decades, Fletcher lived quietly, working as a welder during World War II and later as a housekeeper. She did not speak much about Tulsa until much later. But since her late 90s, Fletcher became a leading voice for Tulsa survivors. At the age of 107, Fletcher testified before Congress in 2021 on the need for justice and reparations for the massacre. She asked America to remember what happened in Tulsa, and to deliver justice to survivors and descendants. She described the fear, the destruction and the lifelong losses caused by the massacre, seeking acknowledgement of the event as a state-enabled attack on a Black community. She met and engaged with civil rights groups, spoke at commemorations, and challenged leaders to confront the legacy of racial violence. She wrote a memoir titled Don’t Let Them Bury My Story to preserve her story and the memory of Tulsa, and joined a lawsuit seeking reparations. The case was dismissed by the courts, but Fletcher’s advocacy brought national attention to a suppressed chapter of America’s dark history. Also read: ‘Move back to India’: Racist attack on Indian man in Canada sparks debate online What happened in Tulsa? The trigger event happened on 30 May 1921, when Black teenager Dick Rowland was accused of assaulting a white elevator operator, which was later described as accidental and exaggerated. But the local newspapers, many of them owned by whites, inflamed the issue and even publicly urged a lynching of Blacks. During the hearing of the case, a white mob gathered at the courthouse, while armed Black residents arrived to defend Rowland. A confrontation broke out, and shots were fired. At the end of it, an estimated 300 people were killed, mostly Black residents of Greenwood. Some 1,200 homes and mostly Black businesses were burned down, and nearly 10,000 Black residents were left homeless. Many Black residents were detained and held in makeshift camps. The event shattered the success story and confidence of the Black community in the state. Also read: One block from White House, Black Lives Matter Plaza 'dismantled' What were the reasons for Tulsa massacre? The Tulsa massacre was the culmination of years of deep resentment among whites about Greenwood’s success story and long-standing racial hostility in Oklahoma. When Oklahoma became the 46th state of the US in the year 1907, it had racial segregation laws in place. This led to years of racial conflict and white vigilantism, mostly motivated by resentment at Black prosperity. This charged atmosphere eventually resulted in the Tulsa massacre. The massacre was seen as the extent to which white authorities and mobs would go in order to suppress Black advancement in the US. For many years, there was a state-led suppression of the real incidents, damage and cost of Tulsa. The massacre is an example of historical neglect too, as many governments did not allow for a full report of the atrocities. With Fletcher’s passing, the responsibility to protect that memory now rests entirely with the current and future governments.

Viola Fletcher’s passing closes a living link to the 1921 massacre. In the current American reality of racial tensions, this would be a good time for a new look at violence and justice in the US.

Viola Fletcher death: Recalling Tulsa Massacre, a dark chapter of US racist history, as its longest survivor dies at 111

Chinese President Xi Jinping has reaffirmed Beijing's backing for Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, sending a birthday message that pledged continued support for the country's sovereignty at a time of rising tension with the United States. The letter, released by Venezuela's Foreign Ministry, describes China and Venezuela as "intimate friends, dear brothers, and good partners". Xi vowed that Beijing would continue to support Caracas in protecting its national security, stability, and dignity.<h2>China slams the US</h2>The Chinese premier condemned what he called foreign interference in Venezuela's internal affairs, a line seen as a direct response to recent US military moves in the region. He said China would keep supporting Venezuela in "safeguarding its sovereignty and national security, the dignity of the nation, and social stability".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/chinese-man-with-pakistan-travel-history-caught-filming-sensitive-sites-after-sneaking-into-india-from-nepal-1764036527773">Chinese man with Pakistan travel history caught filming sensitive sites after sneaking into India from Nepal</a>His statement comes at a time when Washington has deployed nearly a dozen warships and around 12,000 sailors and Marines to waters off the Venezuelan coast as part of a counter-narcotics and maritime security mission. Venezuela and its allies say the operation is a cover for political pressure on Maduro. "China resolutely opposes the meddling of external forces in Venezuela’s internal affairs under any pretext," Xi wrote, repeating Beijing's longstanding position on non-intervention.Beijing's stance mirrors comments made last week by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, who criticised the US campaign known as Operation Southern Spear. Announced by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, the operation targets what Washington calls narco-terrorist networks and labels the Cartel de los Soles, which American officials allege Maduro leads, as a foreign terrorist organisation. Mao said China supports the "Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace" and urged Washington to take steps that "choose a course of action conducive to peace and stability" rather than escalate tensions.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-he-d-be-proud-if-us-carries-out-strikes-inside-mexico-here-s-why-1763439216625">Trump says he’d be 'proud' if US carries out strikes inside Mexico. Here's why</a><h2>US ally Russia also backs Venezuela</h2>Xi's letter came as Russia also voiced support for Maduro. Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his own message calling Maduro "dear friend" a term he has previously used for US President Donald Trump. He also promised to deepen the "strategic partnership" between Moscow and Caracas. Both letters were shared publicly by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil.

China has thrown full support behind Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, with President Xi Jinping calling Caracas an intimate friend and vowing to defend its sovereignty against US pressure. Scroll for full story.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has reaffirmed Beijing's backing for Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, sending a birthday message that pledged continued support for the country's sovereignty at a time of rising tension with the United States. The letter, released by Venezuela's Foreign Ministry, describes China and Venezuela as "intimate friends, dear brothers, and good partners". Xi vowed that Beijing would continue to support Caracas in protecting its national security, stability, and dignity. China slams the US The Chinese premier condemned what he called foreign interference in Venezuela's internal affairs, a line seen as a direct response to recent US military moves in the region. He said China would keep supporting Venezuela in "safeguarding its sovereignty and national security, the dignity of the nation, and social stability". Also read | Chinese man with Pakistan travel history caught filming sensitive sites after sneaking into India from Nepal His statement comes at a time when Washington has deployed nearly a dozen warships and around 12,000 sailors and Marines to waters off the Venezuelan coast as part of a counter-narcotics and maritime security mission. Venezuela and its allies say the operation is a cover for political pressure on Maduro. "China resolutely opposes the meddling of external forces in Venezuela’s internal affairs under any pretext," Xi wrote, repeating Beijing's longstanding position on non-intervention. Beijing's stance mirrors comments made last week by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, who criticised the US campaign known as Operation Southern Spear. Announced by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, the operation targets what Washington calls narco-terrorist networks and labels the Cartel de los Soles, which American officials allege Maduro leads, as a foreign terrorist organisation. Mao said China supports the "Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace" and urged Washington to take steps that "choose a course of action conducive to peace and stability" rather than escalate tensions. Also read | Trump says he’d be 'proud' if US carries out strikes inside Mexico. Here's why US ally Russia also backs Venezuela Xi's letter came as Russia also voiced support for Maduro. Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his own message calling Maduro "dear friend" a term he has previously used for US President Donald Trump. He also promised to deepen the "strategic partnership" between Moscow and Caracas. Both letters were shared publicly by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil.

China has thrown full support behind Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, with President Xi Jinping calling Caracas an intimate friend and vowing to defend its sovereignty against US pressure. Scroll for full story.

Xi Jinping backs Nicolas Maduro, blasts US meddling as warships circle Venezuela, vows to protect Caracas' sovereignty

A massive volcanic ash cloud reached India from Ethiopia’s Hayli Gubbi volcano, which erupted for the first time in nearly 12,000 years. The rare event has resulted in reduced visibility, forcing several airlines to cancel flights in major cities on Tuesday (Nov 25). The ash cloud swept across the northwest states in the country last night, including Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Delhi-NCR and Punjab. It is headed eastwards across the subcontinent to China.&nbsp;The Directorate General of Civil Aviation on Monday issued an advisory, warning airlines and airports of possible disruptions in flight operations as the authorities track the cloud moving across the region. Major airlines, including IndiGo, Akasa Air, and Dutch carrier KLM, cancelled some flights due to the ash plumes. Several international flights were also cancelled at the Delhi Airport for destinations including Hong Kong, Dubai, Jeddah, Helsinki, Kabul and Frankfurt.&nbsp;A day earlier, IndiGo flight 6E 1433 from Kannur to Abu Dhabi was diverted to Ahmedabad due to the ash plume. IndiGo said that the Airbus plane landed safely, and it will arrange a return flight for passengers to Kannur.<h2>Will the AQI be affected?</h2>The India Meteorological Department (IMD) said the cloud is at an altitude above 10 km. Delhi, which is already facing a severe pollution issue, will not be impacted significantly as the cloud is located way upwards from the ground. The cloud is also moving rapidly eastwards, limiting the time it would affect the air quality in the region. &nbsp;On Sunday (Nov 23), Hayli Gubbi, a long-dormant volcano in northern Ethiopia, erupted, sending ash plumes across the Red Sea toward Yemen and Oman. The cloud then moved toward North India at a speed of 100-120 kmh.&nbsp;The ash cloud is expected to clear from Indian skies by around 7:30 pm on Tuesday as it continues to move eastward to China.

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation on Monday issued an advisory, warning airlines and airports of possible disruptions in flight operations as the authorities track the cloud moving across the region. 

A massive volcanic ash cloud reached India from Ethiopia’s Hayli Gubbi volcano, which erupted for the first time in nearly 12,000 years. The rare event has resulted in reduced visibility, forcing several airlines to cancel flights in major cities on Tuesday (Nov 25). The ash cloud swept across the northwest states in the country last night, including Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Delhi-NCR and Punjab. It is headed eastwards across the subcontinent to China. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation on Monday issued an advisory, warning airlines and airports of possible disruptions in flight operations as the authorities track the cloud moving across the region. Major airlines, including IndiGo, Akasa Air, and Dutch carrier KLM, cancelled some flights due to the ash plumes. Several international flights were also cancelled at the Delhi Airport for destinations including Hong Kong, Dubai, Jeddah, Helsinki, Kabul and Frankfurt. A day earlier, IndiGo flight 6E 1433 from Kannur to Abu Dhabi was diverted to Ahmedabad due to the ash plume. IndiGo said that the Airbus plane landed safely, and it will arrange a return flight for passengers to Kannur. Will the AQI be affected? The India Meteorological Department (IMD) said the cloud is at an altitude above 10 km. Delhi, which is already facing a severe pollution issue, will not be impacted significantly as the cloud is located way upwards from the ground. The cloud is also moving rapidly eastwards, limiting the time it would affect the air quality in the region. On Sunday (Nov 23), Hayli Gubbi, a long-dormant volcano in northern Ethiopia, erupted, sending ash plumes across the Red Sea toward Yemen and Oman. The cloud then moved toward North India at a speed of 100-120 kmh. The ash cloud is expected to clear from Indian skies by around 7:30 pm on Tuesday as it continues to move eastward to China.

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation on Monday issued an advisory, warning airlines and airports of possible disruptions in flight operations as the authorities track the cloud moving across the region.&nbsp;

Volcanic ash cloud from Ethiopia forces flight cancellations in India – Will it worsen Delhi’s AQI?

Sudan's paramilitary Rapid Support Forces on Monday (Nov 24) announced a unilateral three-month ceasefire a day after the army dismissed a US truce proposal from international mediators. The RSF, which has been fighting Sudan's regular army since April 2023, said it was declaring the ceasefire "in response to international efforts, including the initiative of US President Donald Trump and the Quad mediators". The Quad group comprises the United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt.&nbsp;The RSF move came after the UAE lambasted army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan for rejecting the US truce proposal and accusing Washington of echoing Emirati positions on the conflict. The UAE has been widely accused of arming the RSF, but Abu Dhabi has repeatedly denied the charge. On Monday, the RSF announced "a humanitarian truce providing for a cessation of hostilities for three months". The announcement was made in a recorded video message by Burhan's former deputy and now bitter rival, RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Daglo.&nbsp;On Sunday, Burhan called a truce proposal sent by US envoy Massad Boulos on behalf of the Quad group of mediators the "worst yet" and unacceptable to his government, which is based in Port Sudan on the Red Sea. The army chief called the Quad group "biased" as long as the UAE was a member, and accused Boulos of parroting talking points from Abu Dhabi.&nbsp;On Monday, the UAE's minister of state for international cooperation, Reem bint Ebrahim Al Hashimy, lambasted Burhan for demonstrating "consistently obstructive behaviour". "This must be called out," Hashimy said. Rejecting the US plan, Burhan said the proposal "eliminates the armed forces, dissolves security agencies and keeps the militia where they are".&nbsp;&nbsp;On November 6, the RSF announced they had agreed to a proposal for a humanitarian truce put forward by the international mediators. The army-aligned government had rejected an earlier plan in September that would exclude both the military and the RSF from Sudan's post-war political process. That proposal included a three-month humanitarian truce, followed by a permanent ceasefire and a nine-month transition to civilian rule.&nbsp;Last week, Trump said he would move to end the Sudan war, after Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman urged him during a visit to Washington to get involved. Burhan thanked the two leaders for what he called their "honest" initiative, but urged mediators to "come with a positive and proper approach". Among the general's criticisms of the US proposal were claims that it "eliminates the armed forces, dissolves security agencies and keeps the militias where they are" without disarming them. Reiterating that the conflict was "a war for survival", he insisted that any peace agreement must compel the RSF to withdraw fully from captured territory and be confined to designated zones. Burhan also attacked repeated claims by Daglo that the army is controlled by the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood. "Where are these so-called members of the Muslim Brotherhood within the Sudanese army? We do not know them. We only hear such claims in the media," Burhan said.&nbsp;Daglo on Monday said the RSF was open to talks with "all actors except for the terrorist Islamist movement of the Muslim Brotherhood and the National Congress", the now-banned party of former Sudanese leader Omar al-Bashir.Daglo worked for years for Bashir before allying with Burhan to overthrow him in 2019 as part of Sudan's revolution. The pair then snuffed out Sudan's fledgling civilian government. International attention on the conflict has increased since the RSF seized the key Darfur city of El-Fasher last month after a relentless siege that has sparked warnings of crimes against humanity and genocide. Over the past two years, the warring parties in Sudan have violated every ceasefire agreement, with negotiations to halt the war yet to make any breakthroughs.&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Sudan’s RSF declared a three-month unilateral ceasefire after the army rejected a US-backed truce proposal by the Quad mediators. The move deepens tensions between army chief Burhan and RSF leader Daglo, as both trade accusations over bias, militias and foreign involvement.

Sudan's paramilitary Rapid Support Forces on Monday (Nov 24) announced a unilateral three-month ceasefire a day after the army dismissed a US truce proposal from international mediators. The RSF, which has been fighting Sudan's regular army since April 2023, said it was declaring the ceasefire "in response to international efforts, including the initiative of US President Donald Trump and the Quad mediators". The Quad group comprises the United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. The RSF move came after the UAE lambasted army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan for rejecting the US truce proposal and accusing Washington of echoing Emirati positions on the conflict. The UAE has been widely accused of arming the RSF, but Abu Dhabi has repeatedly denied the charge. On Monday, the RSF announced "a humanitarian truce providing for a cessation of hostilities for three months". The announcement was made in a recorded video message by Burhan's former deputy and now bitter rival, RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Daglo. On Sunday, Burhan called a truce proposal sent by US envoy Massad Boulos on behalf of the Quad group of mediators the "worst yet" and unacceptable to his government, which is based in Port Sudan on the Red Sea. The army chief called the Quad group "biased" as long as the UAE was a member, and accused Boulos of parroting talking points from Abu Dhabi. On Monday, the UAE's minister of state for international cooperation, Reem bint Ebrahim Al Hashimy, lambasted Burhan for demonstrating "consistently obstructive behaviour". "This must be called out," Hashimy said. Rejecting the US plan, Burhan said the proposal "eliminates the armed forces, dissolves security agencies and keeps the militia where they are". On November 6, the RSF announced they had agreed to a proposal for a humanitarian truce put forward by the international mediators. The army-aligned government had rejected an earlier plan in September that would exclude both the military and the RSF from Sudan's post-war political process. That proposal included a three-month humanitarian truce, followed by a permanent ceasefire and a nine-month transition to civilian rule. Last week, Trump said he would move to end the Sudan war, after Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman urged him during a visit to Washington to get involved. Burhan thanked the two leaders for what he called their "honest" initiative, but urged mediators to "come with a positive and proper approach". Among the general's criticisms of the US proposal were claims that it "eliminates the armed forces, dissolves security agencies and keeps the militias where they are" without disarming them. Reiterating that the conflict was "a war for survival", he insisted that any peace agreement must compel the RSF to withdraw fully from captured territory and be confined to designated zones. Burhan also attacked repeated claims by Daglo that the army is controlled by the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood. "Where are these so-called members of the Muslim Brotherhood within the Sudanese army? We do not know them. We only hear such claims in the media," Burhan said. Daglo on Monday said the RSF was open to talks with "all actors except for the terrorist Islamist movement of the Muslim Brotherhood and the National Congress", the now-banned party of former Sudanese leader Omar al-Bashir. Daglo worked for years for Bashir before allying with Burhan to overthrow him in 2019 as part of Sudan's revolution. The pair then snuffed out Sudan's fledgling civilian government. International attention on the conflict has increased since the RSF seized the key Darfur city of El-Fasher last month after a relentless siege that has sparked warnings of crimes against humanity and genocide. Over the past two years, the warring parties in Sudan have violated every ceasefire agreement, with negotiations to halt the war yet to make any breakthroughs. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Sudan’s RSF declared a three-month unilateral ceasefire after the army rejected a US-backed truce proposal by the Quad mediators. The move deepens tensions between army chief Burhan and RSF leader Daglo, as both trade accusations over bias, militias and foreign involvement.

Sudan's RSF declares unilateral three-month ceasefire after army rejects US plan

US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy issued a nationwide call for Americans to stop boarding flights in pyjamas and slippers, calling the growing trend a decline in travel etiquette. Stressing the need to 'bring civility back', Duffy stated that airport standards have 'gone too far'.&nbsp;“Let’s not show up at the airport in slippers and pyjamas, it’s time we bring civility back," the US Transportation Secretary said. Speaking on Fox Business, he also said," People dress up like they're going to bed when they fly... We want to push people as we come into a really busy travel season, help people out, be in a good mood, dress up."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Sean Duffy: &quot;People dress up like they&#39;re going to bed when they fly... We want to push people as we come into a really busy travel season, help people out, be in a good mood, dress up.&quot;<a href="https://t.co/YT9ne8ylfh">pic.twitter.com/YT9ne8ylfh</a>&mdash; Molly Ploofkins (@Mollyploofkins) <a href="https://twitter.com/Mollyploofkins/status/1991686820523081848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 21, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h3>Netizens react to the remarks of US Transportation Secretary</h3>Netizens on the social media platform X quickly piled in and began trolling, meme-ing, and mocking the transportation secretary in the surfaced video for blaming travellers instead of addressing the real problems. One of the users supported the Secretary's stand and said,"He’s not telling you to wear a suit or a dress. He’s telling you not to wear your fucking pyjamas. And he’s right."&nbsp;The next said,"I always dress for flying. Makes you feel better. I never understood the pyjama or sweats thing at all. Like you've stopped caring about yourself. It's not about others. It's about self-respect, I figure."&nbsp;"You shouldn't wear your pyjamas. But the airlines went from caring about people's comfort and space to packing people in like sardines and trying to maximise profit by lowering their standards. So people are trying to be more comfortable in an uncomfortable position created by the airline industry, which doesn't care about your travel experience. People's responses reflect that," another said.&nbsp;One of the netizens expressed frustration and said, "People stand in huge lines to get stuffed into narrow seats with no leg room. The bathrooms are insanely tiny. Disembarking from the plane is chaos. The food is barely food. But sure, the problem is wearing comfortable clothing and not dressing up."&nbsp;The next also said,"This administration is so anti-freedom and so anti-liberty, it’s astonishing. I will dress exactly how I wish, and won’t let the government tell me how to dress when I fly."

US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has urged Americans to stop boarding flights in pyjamas and slippers, warning that the trend reflects a decline in travel etiquette and calling for efforts to “bring civility back.”

US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy issued a nationwide call for Americans to stop boarding flights in pyjamas and slippers, calling the growing trend a decline in travel etiquette. Stressing the need to 'bring civility back', Duffy stated that airport standards have 'gone too far'. “Let’s not show up at the airport in slippers and pyjamas, it’s time we bring civility back," the US Transportation Secretary said. Speaking on Fox Business, he also said," People dress up like they're going to bed when they fly... We want to push people as we come into a really busy travel season, help people out, be in a good mood, dress up."

US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has urged Americans to stop boarding flights in pyjamas and slippers, warning that the trend reflects a decline in travel etiquette and calling for efforts to “bring civility back.”

‘Bring civility back’: Will US ban 'pyjamas and slippers' at airports? What transport secy said

Days after the fatal crash of Tejas fighter jet in Dubai airshow, Armenia has suspended negotiations on the purchase of the jet, as per a report. In the fatal accident, the aircraft's pilot, Indian Wing Commander Namansh Syal, was killed. The Jerusalem Post in its report stated that Armenia was at the final stage of a deal with the Indian government and aircraft manufacturer HAL regarding the purchase of 12 aircraft for $1.2 billion. However, the Armenian government has not issued any official statement on the same. The Indian government has also not commented on the matter.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-all-quietly-watched-us-pilot-recounts-horrific-tejas-crash-reveals-his-team-withdrew-from-dubai-airshow-1763891602507">‘We all quietly watched…’: US pilot recounts horrific Tejas crash, reveals his team withdrew from Dubai Airshow</a>&nbsp;Defending its decsion to continue with the show even after the fatal crash, organisers of the Dubai Air Show on their official handle on X, said that they continued the show as a “mark of respect and tribute” to Namansh Syal's dedication. “The Dubai Airshow organising team remains deeply saddened by the loss of Wing Commander Syal during Friday's flying display. In consultation with the team, the decision was made to continue the show as a mark of respect and tribute to his passion for aviation. Wing Commander Syal had been an integral part of this year's Airshow, earning admiration for his skill and dedication. The final displays after the incident were performed in his honour, and a formal service was held on Saturday to celebrate his life and contribution. Our thoughts and heartfelt condolences remain with his family, colleagues, and all those affected,” the statement read.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/tearful-goodbye-gun-salute-and-grief-last-rites-of-wing-commander-namansh-syal-who-died-in-tejas-crash-performed-1763904153157">Tearful goodbye, gun salute and grief: Last rites of Wing Commander Namansh Syal, who died in Tejas crash, performed</a>&nbsp;Earlier on Sunday, the last rites of Wing Commander Namansh Syal was held at his native village, Patialkar, in Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. Wing Commander Afshan, wife of the pilot killed in the crash, bid a tearful farewell to her husband. The Indian Air Force (IAF) honoured the dedicated pilot with full military rites. In a post, it said, “A dedicated fighter pilot and thorough professional, he served the nation with unwavering commitment, exceptional skill and an unyielding sense of duty. His dignified persona earned him immense respect through a life devoted to service, and was visible in the send-off attended by UAE officials, colleagues, friends, and the officials of the Indian Embassy.”

Armenia has paused talks to buy 12 Indian Tejas fighter jets after the Dubai Airshow crash that killed pilot Wing Commander Namansh Syal. The incident has hurt the jet’s image as India begins producing the advanced Tejas A1. 

Days after the fatal crash of Tejas fighter jet in Dubai airshow, Armenia has suspended negotiations on the purchase of the jet, as per a report. In the fatal accident, the aircraft's pilot, Indian Wing Commander Namansh Syal, was killed. The Jerusalem Post in its report stated that Armenia was at the final stage of a deal with the Indian government and aircraft manufacturer HAL regarding the purchase of 12 aircraft for $1.2 billion. However, the Armenian government has not issued any official statement on the same. The Indian government has also not commented on the matter. Also read: ‘We all quietly watched…’: US pilot recounts horrific Tejas crash, reveals his team withdrew from Dubai Airshow Defending its decsion to continue with the show even after the fatal crash, organisers of the Dubai Air Show on their official handle on X, said that they continued the show as a “mark of respect and tribute” to Namansh Syal's dedication. “The Dubai Airshow organising team remains deeply saddened by the loss of Wing Commander Syal during Friday's flying display. In consultation with the team, the decision was made to continue the show as a mark of respect and tribute to his passion for aviation. Wing Commander Syal had been an integral part of this year's Airshow, earning admiration for his skill and dedication. The final displays after the incident were performed in his honour, and a formal service was held on Saturday to celebrate his life and contribution. Our thoughts and heartfelt condolences remain with his family, colleagues, and all those affected,” the statement read. Also read: Tearful goodbye, gun salute and grief: Last rites of Wing Commander Namansh Syal, who died in Tejas crash, performed Earlier on Sunday, the last rites of Wing Commander Namansh Syal was held at his native village, Patialkar, in Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. Wing Commander Afshan, wife of the pilot killed in the crash, bid a tearful farewell to her husband. The Indian Air Force (IAF) honoured the dedicated pilot with full military rites. In a post, it said, “A dedicated fighter pilot and thorough professional, he served the nation with unwavering commitment, exceptional skill and an unyielding sense of duty. His dignified persona earned him immense respect through a life devoted to service, and was visible in the send-off attended by UAE officials, colleagues, friends, and the officials of the Indian Embassy.”

Armenia has paused talks to buy 12 Indian Tejas fighter jets after the Dubai Airshow crash that killed pilot Wing Commander Namansh Syal. The incident has hurt the jet’s image as India begins producing the advanced Tejas A1.&nbsp;

Armenia pauses $1.2 billion Indian Tejas deal after Dubai crash? Here's what we know

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Vivek Ramaswamy’s wealth doubles in 9 months, reaching $1.8bn. Here’s how. Hint: It’s not from politics

Karoline Leavitt suffering from PTSD? Trump’s Press Secretary says...

After Taliban vows ‘response’, Pakistan denies role in strikes on Afghanistan

Taiwan's TSMC to sue former executive, Lo Wei-jen, over trade secrets

GLOBAL TEA | China and Taiwan: World's most complicated situationship

Michelle's latest photoshoot goes viral, netizens speculate weight-loss meds

WATCH: New York couple brutally assaulted by mob, gets nose and ribs broken

Japan ‘scrambles aircraft’ after ‘Chinese’ drone detected near Taiwan

UK set to roll out new ETA rule for foreigners – Which countries are affected?

Australia senator, who wore burqa in parl in bid to ban it, suspended

China-Japan dispute reaches UN: Here's what both sides claimed

Bracing for Ukraine peace: Russian, US officials hold crunch talks in UAE

Russian strikes kill 6, wound 13 in overnight attack, says Zelensky

Back from the dead! Thai woman wakes up knocking inside her coffin on way to cremation

Why is Pentagon investigating Democratic senator Mark Kelly

‘We’ll be back in…’: DOGE finally breaks silence on claims it ‘doesn’t exist’

US vs Venezuela: Why would Cuba want to kill Maduro?

Bangladesh-India ties: Dhaka envoy praises shared history on Armed Forces Day

What is Hayli Gubbi volcanic ash cloud? Know how it forms & affects environment

Anti-India slogans raised in Canada: What happened in 'Khalistan Referendum'?

Viola Fletcher, longest Tulsa Massacre suvivor, dies. What happened in 1921?

Xi Jinping backs Nicolas Maduro, blasts US meddling as warships circle Venezuela

Volcanic ash forces flight cancellations in India – Will it worsen Delhi’s AQI?

Sudan's RSF declares unilateral three-month ceasefire after army rejects US plan

Will US ban 'pyjamas and slippers' at airports? What transport secy said

Armenia pauses $1.2 billion Indian Tejas deal after Dubai crash? What we know