'Hell of a beautiful a**': Trump compliments Nicki Minaj as rapper joins him in Michigan rally

'Hire the robot, fire the human': Bill Gates's words hint at a bleak future

Israel elections: Record voter turnout in decades as Opposition edges ahead of Netanyahu in early projections

'You Still Can't...': Yuvraj mocks Abhishek Sharma after 35-ball 100 in 3rd T20I vs New Zealand

Delhi traders urge Rahul Gandhi to postpone INDIA bloc rally once again

Maurene Comey, daughter of ex-FBI director James Comey, was unlawfully fired as federal prosecutor, judge rules

‘After Breaking Bad, Prison Break has begun in Tamil Nadu’: Stalin turns sarcastic in slamming Vijay govt over Theni jailbreak

India invites Pakistan, along with other SCO member countries for SCO Civilisational Dialogue in Delhi

Hijack scare unfolds on United flight over suspicious text message. Here is what happened

Police called after 3-year-old scores 10 goals in 12 minutes at Florida youth soccer game

New OTT releases this week (October 26-November 1, 2026): Baththa, Akka, The One About Matthew Perry- 7 titles coming on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Supreme Court seeks Centre's response to DNPA's challenge to DPDP Act

US weighs lifting sanctions on Russia’s state-backed investment fund after diesel deal: Report

'Already tired of his 9-to-5': Baby born with a moustache becomes internet sensation, video goes viral | Watch

‘Food poisoned by meat’: Trump mocks James Talarico over campaign absence, as former Texas Chief Justice endorses Democrat

Trump says he will accept midterm results ‘if they’re honest’, refers to his veto powers

Russia, Iran eye joint oil and gas projects as Pezeshkian, Putin hold talks in Moscow

India and US defence ministers set for bilateral talks in Philippines

Storm Boelo’s fierce winds push passenger plane onto grass in UK, terrifying landing caught on cam

Brazil's Flavio Bolsonaro flees to US after presidential election defeat to Lula

52 years later, DNA evidence links serial killer Ted Bundy to 1974 murder of 17-year-old

Democrats allege 'desperate efforts to cover up' Trump's involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex crimes, release 50-page report

'Complete lack of confidence' in Netanyahu, says Eisenkot after Opposition leads in exit polls; Arab parties make gains

'She is a beautiful woman': Trump mocks Mexican President Sheinbaum, mimics her voice at US Midterms rally

Mitchell Starc leads Australia’s fightback with six-wicket haul on day 1 of Cape Town Test

France protests: Demonstrators may pay up to €10,000 for riot damage under new bill

'I've done my work sincerely': AR Rahman on facing backlash over Ramayana soundtrack

Uganda arrests its 'worst serial killer and cannibal' who hacked 38 people to death

Israel elections 2026: What happens if Netanyahu loses | Gravitas

'Shove that ballroom up your a**': Trump heckled at Mississippi rally over White House ballroom renovations | WATCH

Trump accused of 'brutal' rape by ex-Miss Switzerland; Beatrice Keul alleges 'Don's best friend' Epstein facilitated assault in 1993

'This is America. Back up': Shouting match breaks out between US and Cuban officials at UN | WATCH

Israel polls: Highest early turnout since 1973; Netanyahu’s Likud alleges fraud, ‘attempt to steal’ election

'He is a red flag': Ex-India strength and conditioning coach on Rohit's fitness regime

&nbsp;Samsung has increased the listed prices of its entire Galaxy S26 series in India by Rs 20,000, with the revised prices taking effect from September 18. The hike covers the Galaxy S26, Galaxy S26+ and Galaxy S26 Ultra across all seven listed configurations. The move means the entry-level Galaxy S26 now crosses the Rs 1 lakh mark, while Samsung’s most expensive Galaxy S26 Ultra variant has crossed Rs 2 lakh. The timing is also notable, coming as Apple’s latest iPhone 18 Pro series went on sale in India.&nbsp;<h2>Samsung Galaxy S26 new price in India</h2>The Galaxy S26 12GB RAM + 256GB storage model now costs Rs 1,07,999, compared with its launch price of Rs 87,999. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen from Rs 1,07,999 to Rs 1,27,999.Samsung originally launched the Galaxy S26 in India at Rs 87,999, according to its India newsroom.&nbsp;Galaxy S26+ price after the hike&nbsp;The Galaxy S26+ has also become Rs 20,000 more expensive. The 12GB + 256GB model now costs Rs 1,39,999, up from Rs 1,19,999. Meanwhile, the 12GB + 512GB version has increased from Rs 1,39,999 to Rs 1,59,999.&nbsp;<h2>Galaxy S26 Ultra now starts at Rs 1.59 lakh</h2>The biggest jump in sticker price comes at the top end of the range. The Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 256GB now costs Rs 1,59,999, compared with Rs 1,39,999 at launch. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen to Rs 1,79,999 from Rs 1,59,999. The flagship 16GB RAM + 1TB Galaxy S26 Ultra now costs Rs 2,09,999, up from Rs 1,89,999.&nbsp;<h2>Full Samsung Galaxy S26 price list</h2>Model Launch price New price&nbsp;Samsung has increased the listed prices of its entire Galaxy S26 series in India by Rs 20,000, with the revised prices taking effect from September 18. The hike covers the Galaxy S26, Galaxy S26+ and Galaxy S26 Ultra across all seven listed configurations. The move means the entry-level Galaxy S26 now crosses the Rs 1 lakh mark, while Samsung’s most expensive Galaxy S26 Ultra variant has crossed Rs 2 lakh. The timing is also notable, coming as Apple’s latest iPhone 18 Pro series went on sale in India.&nbsp;<h2>Samsung Galaxy S26 new price in India</h2>The Galaxy S26 12GB RAM + 256GB storage model now costs Rs 1,07,999, compared with its launch price of Rs 87,999. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen from Rs 1,07,999 to Rs 1,27,999.Samsung originally launched the Galaxy S26 in India at Rs 87,999, according to its India newsroom.&nbsp;Galaxy S26+ price after the hike&nbsp;The Galaxy S26+ has also become Rs 20,000 more expensive. The 12GB + 256GB model now costs Rs 1,39,999, up from Rs 1,19,999. Meanwhile, the 12GB + 512GB version has increased from Rs 1,39,999 to Rs 1,59,999.&nbsp;<h2>Galaxy S26 Ultra now starts at Rs 1.59 lakh</h2>The biggest jump in sticker price comes at the top end of the range. The Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 256GB now costs Rs 1,59,999, compared with Rs 1,39,999 at launch. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen to Rs 1,79,999 from Rs 1,59,999. The flagship 16GB RAM + 1TB Galaxy S26 Ultra now costs Rs 2,09,999, up from Rs 1,89,999.&nbsp;<h2>Full Samsung Galaxy S26 price list</h2>Model Launch price New priceGalaxy S26 12GB + 256GB Rs 87,999 Rs 1,07,999Galaxy S26 12GB + 512GB Rs 1,07,999 Rs 1,27,999Galaxy S26+ 12GB + 256GB Rs 1,19,999 Rs 1,39,999Galaxy S26+ 12GB + 512GB Rs 1,39,999 Rs 1,59,999Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 256GB Rs 1,39,999 Rs 1,59,999Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 512GB Rs 1,59,999 Rs 1,79,999Galaxy S26 Ultra 16GB + 1TB Rs 1,89,999 Rs 2,09,999&nbsp;The wider smartphone market is facing higher memory and component costs, with strong AI infrastructure demand being cited as one factor behind rising memory prices. However, Samsung has not publicly provided a detailed India-specific explanation for this particular Rs 20,000 revision. For buyers, the important point is simple: the Galaxy S26 series now carries a significantly higher listed price in India, although retailer discounts, bank offers and exchange deals can reduce the actual amount paid.&nbsp;The wider smartphone market is facing higher memory and component costs, with strong AI infrastructure demand being cited as one factor behind rising memory prices. However, Samsung has not publicly provided a detailed India-specific explanation for this particular Rs 20,000 revision. For buyers, the important point is simple: the Galaxy S26 series now carries a significantly higher listed price in India, although retailer discounts, bank offers and exchange deals can reduce the actual amount paid.

Samsung has raised the listed prices of all seven Galaxy S26 series variants in India by Rs 20,000. The Galaxy S26 now starts at Rs 1,07,999, while the top-end S26 Ultra 1TB costs Rs 2,09,999

Samsung has increased the listed prices of its entire Galaxy S26 series in India by Rs 20,000, with the revised prices taking effect from September 18. The hike covers the Galaxy S26, Galaxy S26+ and Galaxy S26 Ultra across all seven listed configurations. The move means the entry-level Galaxy S26 now crosses the Rs 1 lakh mark, while Samsung’s most expensive Galaxy S26 Ultra variant has crossed Rs 2 lakh. The timing is also notable, coming as Apple’s latest iPhone 18 Pro series went on sale in India. Samsung Galaxy S26 new price in India The Galaxy S26 12GB RAM + 256GB storage model now costs Rs 1,07,999, compared with its launch price of Rs 87,999. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen from Rs 1,07,999 to Rs 1,27,999. Samsung originally launched the Galaxy S26 in India at Rs 87,999, according to its India newsroom. Galaxy S26+ price after the hike The Galaxy S26+ has also become Rs 20,000 more expensive. The 12GB + 256GB model now costs Rs 1,39,999, up from Rs 1,19,999. Meanwhile, the 12GB + 512GB version has increased from Rs 1,39,999 to Rs 1,59,999. Galaxy S26 Ultra now starts at Rs 1.59 lakh The biggest jump in sticker price comes at the top end of the range. The Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 256GB now costs Rs 1,59,999, compared with Rs 1,39,999 at launch. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen to Rs 1,79,999 from Rs 1,59,999. The flagship 16GB RAM + 1TB Galaxy S26 Ultra now costs Rs 2,09,999, up from Rs 1,89,999. Full Samsung Galaxy S26 price list Model Launch price New price Samsung has increased the listed prices of its entire Galaxy S26 series in India by Rs 20,000, with the revised prices taking effect from September 18. The hike covers the Galaxy S26, Galaxy S26+ and Galaxy S26 Ultra across all seven listed configurations. The move means the entry-level Galaxy S26 now crosses the Rs 1 lakh mark, while Samsung’s most expensive Galaxy S26 Ultra variant has crossed Rs 2 lakh. The timing is also notable, coming as Apple’s latest iPhone 18 Pro series went on sale in India. Samsung Galaxy S26 new price in India The Galaxy S26 12GB RAM + 256GB storage model now costs Rs 1,07,999, compared with its launch price of Rs 87,999. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen from Rs 1,07,999 to Rs 1,27,999. Samsung originally launched the Galaxy S26 in India at Rs 87,999, according to its India newsroom. Galaxy S26+ price after the hike The Galaxy S26+ has also become Rs 20,000 more expensive. The 12GB + 256GB model now costs Rs 1,39,999, up from Rs 1,19,999. Meanwhile, the 12GB + 512GB version has increased from Rs 1,39,999 to Rs 1,59,999. Galaxy S26 Ultra now starts at Rs 1.59 lakh The biggest jump in sticker price comes at the top end of the range. The Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 256GB now costs Rs 1,59,999, compared with Rs 1,39,999 at launch. The 12GB + 512GB version has risen to Rs 1,79,999 from Rs 1,59,999. The flagship 16GB RAM + 1TB Galaxy S26 Ultra now costs Rs 2,09,999, up from Rs 1,89,999. Full Samsung Galaxy S26 price list Model Launch price New price Galaxy S26 12GB + 256GB Rs 87,999 Rs 1,07,999 Galaxy S26 12GB + 512GB Rs 1,07,999 Rs 1,27,999 Galaxy S26+ 12GB + 256GB Rs 1,19,999 Rs 1,39,999 Galaxy S26+ 12GB + 512GB Rs 1,39,999 Rs 1,59,999 Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 256GB Rs 1,39,999 Rs 1,59,999 Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB + 512GB Rs 1,59,999 Rs 1,79,999 Galaxy S26 Ultra 16GB + 1TB Rs 1,89,999 Rs 2,09,999 The wider smartphone market is facing higher memory and component costs, with strong AI infrastructure demand being cited as one factor behind rising memory prices. However, Samsung has not publicly provided a detailed India-specific explanation for this particular Rs 20,000 revision. For buyers, the important point is simple: the Galaxy S26 series now carries a significantly higher listed price in India, although retailer discounts, bank offers and exchange deals can reduce the actual amount paid. The wider smartphone market is facing higher memory and component costs, with strong AI infrastructure demand being cited as one factor behind rising memory prices. However, Samsung has not publicly provided a detailed India-specific explanation for this particular Rs 20,000 revision. For buyers, the important point is simple: the Galaxy S26 series now carries a significantly higher listed price in India, although retailer discounts, bank offers and exchange deals can reduce the actual amount paid.

Samsung has raised the listed prices of all seven Galaxy S26 series variants in India by Rs 20,000. The Galaxy S26 now starts at Rs 1,07,999, while the top-end S26 Ultra 1TB costs Rs 2,09,999

Samsung raises Galaxy S26 prices by Rs 20,000: Here’s what each model now costs

A Microsoft executive once described the mass collection of online content to train artificial intelligence as the “largest theft of labour in human history”, according to newly unsealed court documents.&nbsp;The comments were made by Brent Hecht, Microsoft’s director of applied science, in internal documents that have emerged in the copyright battle between The New York Times, Microsoft and OpenAI. Hecht warned that millions of people could see AI systems “hoovering up” their work as an unprecedented form of theft.&nbsp;The disclosure is significant because Microsoft and OpenAI are defending their use of copyrighted material to train AI models, arguing that the practice can qualify as fair use under US copyright law. Microsoft has stressed that Hecht’s comments represented his individual perspective and were not the company's legal position.<h2>Why did Microsoft executive raise the alarm?</h2>In a 2023 internal document, Hecht wrote that content creators had generally not intended for their work to be used in this way and were not being compensated for it.&nbsp;<h2>He also warned of a potential “doom loop”.</h2>The concern was simple: AI models depend on a constant supply of high-quality information from the internet. But if AI products reduce the money publishers and other creators make, fewer people may be able to produce the original work that future AI systems depend on. In another Microsoft document, Hecht reportedly described the situation as one in which an AI product could threaten the economic foundations of its own “content supply chain”.<h2>Chatbots could also take readers away from news websites</h2>The documents reveal another problem for publishers. ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot can provide information directly to users, potentially reducing the need to visit the original websites.&nbsp;Microsoft data cited in the court filings showed that click-through rates to The New York Times and Daily News were 83 to 93 per cent lower on Copilot's “answer engine” than on traditional Bing Search.OpenAI's head of ChatGPT, Nick Turley, also described AI products as “largely substitutive” and said they would become increasingly so as the technology improved. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella acknowledged in a deposition that chatbots can effectively give users information on an AI platform instead of sending them to the underlying website.<h2>The bigger battle over AI and copyright</h2>The New York Times sued Microsoft and OpenAI in 2023, alleging that their AI systems were trained on its copyrighted journalism without permission. Other publishers, including the New York Daily News, The Intercept and the Center for Investigative Reporting, later joined the litigation. The publishers argue that using their work to train AI harms their businesses and allows technology companies to compete with the very organisations producing the information. Microsoft and OpenAI maintain that AI training is protected by fair use because the systems transform the material rather than simply republishing it.&nbsp;The court has yet to resolve the broader dispute.But the newly unsealed documents have exposed an uncomfortable question for the AI industry: if AI companies rely on the internet for the information that makes their models useful, what happens if those same systems make it harder for the people producing that information to survive?

Newly unsealed court documents have revealed that Microsoft’s director of applied science privately described the large-scale use of online content to train AI as an “astonishing theft” and potentially the “largest theft of labour in human history”.

A Microsoft executive once described the mass collection of online content to train artificial intelligence as the “largest theft of labour in human history”, according to newly unsealed court documents. The comments were made by Brent Hecht, Microsoft’s director of applied science, in internal documents that have emerged in the copyright battle between The New York Times, Microsoft and OpenAI. Hecht warned that millions of people could see AI systems “hoovering up” their work as an unprecedented form of theft. The disclosure is significant because Microsoft and OpenAI are defending their use of copyrighted material to train AI models, arguing that the practice can qualify as fair use under US copyright law. Microsoft has stressed that Hecht’s comments represented his individual perspective and were not the company's legal position. Why did Microsoft executive raise the alarm? In a 2023 internal document, Hecht wrote that content creators had generally not intended for their work to be used in this way and were not being compensated for it. He also warned of a potential “doom loop”. The concern was simple: AI models depend on a constant supply of high-quality information from the internet. But if AI products reduce the money publishers and other creators make, fewer people may be able to produce the original work that future AI systems depend on. In another Microsoft document, Hecht reportedly described the situation as one in which an AI product could threaten the economic foundations of its own “content supply chain”. Chatbots could also take readers away from news websites The documents reveal another problem for publishers. ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot can provide information directly to users, potentially reducing the need to visit the original websites. Microsoft data cited in the court filings showed that click-through rates to The New York Times and Daily News were 83 to 93 per cent lower on Copilot's “answer engine” than on traditional Bing Search. OpenAI's head of ChatGPT, Nick Turley, also described AI products as “largely substitutive” and said they would become increasingly so as the technology improved. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella acknowledged in a deposition that chatbots can effectively give users information on an AI platform instead of sending them to the underlying website. The bigger battle over AI and copyright The New York Times sued Microsoft and OpenAI in 2023, alleging that their AI systems were trained on its copyrighted journalism without permission. Other publishers, including the New York Daily News, The Intercept and the Center for Investigative Reporting, later joined the litigation. The publishers argue that using their work to train AI harms their businesses and allows technology companies to compete with the very organisations producing the information. Microsoft and OpenAI maintain that AI training is protected by fair use because the systems transform the material rather than simply republishing it. The court has yet to resolve the broader dispute. But the newly unsealed documents have exposed an uncomfortable question for the AI industry: if AI companies rely on the internet for the information that makes their models useful, what happens if those same systems make it harder for the people producing that information to survive?

Newly unsealed court documents have revealed that Microsoft’s director of applied science privately described the large-scale use of online content to train AI as an “astonishing theft” and potentially the “largest theft of labour in human history”.

Microsoft executive called AI training the ‘largest theft of labour in human history’

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected claims that artificial intelligence could wipe out humanity by 2030, saying there is a “0% chance” the world will end that way.&nbsp;Huang made the comments in an interview with CBS News as warnings about advanced AI have intensified. He described such predictions as “doomsday narratives” and said they were not grounded in science.His comments come amid a growing divide in the AI industry. Some researchers and executives are calling for stronger safeguards and a slower pace of development, while Huang has argued that AI development should continue rapidly&nbsp; provided unsafe products are not released.<h2>What did Jensen Huang say?</h2>Asked about predictions that AI could destroy humanity by the end of the decade, Huang was unequivocal. “2030 is not going to be the end of the world,” he told CBS News. “There is a 0% chance it’s going to be the end of the world.” Huang also rejected the idea that AI development should be slowed simply because of fears about future risks.&nbsp;“We should go as fast as we can,” he said, while adding that companies should never release products before they are ready or deploy systems that are unsafe. The distinction is important. Huang is not arguing that AI has no safety risks. His position is that those risks can be managed without slowing the overall development of the technology.<h2>Why are AI extinction warnings growing?</h2>The comments follow the high-profile resignation of Jacob Coxon, a researcher who worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI. Coxon said the companies were moving towards self-improving AI too quickly and warned that people building the technology “earnestly believe” it could kill humanity by the end of the decade. His comments triggered a wider debate over whether the AI race is moving faster than safety research.Anthropic alignment researcher Evan Hubinger also publicly backed Coxon’s concerns and gave his own estimate of more than 10 per cent for an AI-driven human extinction event within the next decade. That is an individual assessment, not an established scientific forecast.<h2>Huang and Trump share a different view</h2>Huang's comments also follow US President Donald Trump’s recent dismissal of AI doomsday warnings as a “hoax”. During a public call with Huang on September 14, Trump said AI would not take over the world and argued that the US should not stop the industry. Huang agreed with him during the exchange.&nbsp;However, the wider debate remains unresolved.&nbsp;Huang leads Nvidia, the dominant supplier of advanced chips used to train and run many modern AI systems. That gives his company a major commercial interest in continued AI expansion. On the other side, figures including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have called for stronger safeguards and discussions about pacing frontier AI development. The disagreement now centres on a crucial question: can AI progress continue at full speed while safety measures keep pace with increasingly capable systems?&nbsp;

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected predictions that artificial intelligence could cause human extinction by 2030, saying there is “0% chance” the world will end that way. His comments come amid a growing debate over AI safety and calls to slow development.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected claims that artificial intelligence could wipe out humanity by 2030, saying there is a “0% chance” the world will end that way. Huang made the comments in an interview with CBS News as warnings about advanced AI have intensified. He described such predictions as “doomsday narratives” and said they were not grounded in science. His comments come amid a growing divide in the AI industry. Some researchers and executives are calling for stronger safeguards and a slower pace of development, while Huang has argued that AI development should continue rapidly provided unsafe products are not released. What did Jensen Huang say? Asked about predictions that AI could destroy humanity by the end of the decade, Huang was unequivocal. “2030 is not going to be the end of the world,” he told CBS News. “There is a 0% chance it’s going to be the end of the world.” Huang also rejected the idea that AI development should be slowed simply because of fears about future risks. “We should go as fast as we can,” he said, while adding that companies should never release products before they are ready or deploy systems that are unsafe. The distinction is important. Huang is not arguing that AI has no safety risks. His position is that those risks can be managed without slowing the overall development of the technology. Why are AI extinction warnings growing? The comments follow the high-profile resignation of Jacob Coxon, a researcher who worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI. Coxon said the companies were moving towards self-improving AI too quickly and warned that people building the technology “earnestly believe” it could kill humanity by the end of the decade. His comments triggered a wider debate over whether the AI race is moving faster than safety research. Anthropic alignment researcher Evan Hubinger also publicly backed Coxon’s concerns and gave his own estimate of more than 10 per cent for an AI-driven human extinction event within the next decade. That is an individual assessment, not an established scientific forecast. Huang and Trump share a different view Huang's comments also follow US President Donald Trump’s recent dismissal of AI doomsday warnings as a “hoax”. During a public call with Huang on September 14, Trump said AI would not take over the world and argued that the US should not stop the industry. Huang agreed with him during the exchange. However, the wider debate remains unresolved. Huang leads Nvidia, the dominant supplier of advanced chips used to train and run many modern AI systems. That gives his company a major commercial interest in continued AI expansion. On the other side, figures including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have called for stronger safeguards and discussions about pacing frontier AI development. The disagreement now centres on a crucial question: can AI progress continue at full speed while safety measures keep pace with increasingly capable systems?

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected predictions that artificial intelligence could cause human extinction by 2030, saying there is “0% chance” the world will end that way. His comments come amid a growing debate over AI safety and calls to slow development.

‘0% chance’: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang dismisses AI extinction fears by 2030

Amid calls for artificial intelligence (AI) slowdown, a new lawsuit claims Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI and Google made an illegal deal to slow the pace of their respective AI development. The lawsuit was filed Friday (Sep 20) in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, argues that the leading AI companies violated antitrust laws when they agreed to coordinate slowdown efforts, and that doing so would reduce the value consumers get for paid AI subscriptions. Lawyers representing four named plaintiffs, who pay for subscriptions to ChatGPT, Claude, Grok or Gemini, are bringing the lawsuit on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of other paid subscribers to those services.&nbsp;The coordination largely took place on Sept. 12, the lawsuit argues, when Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay urging for industrywide cooperation on decelerating advancements in favor of enhanced safety measures. That same day, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, SpaceXAI CEO Elon Musk and Google DeepMind’s co-founder and chair Demis Hassabis each publicly responded to Amodei’s proposals in agreement.&nbsp;But the lawsuit also alleges that the coordination began to take shape months earlier. It points to a statement from July 2026 that high-ranking employees from several of the leading AI labs signed that acknowledged the “intense competitive pressure not to unilaterally slow” development. That statement called on the government to support a global effort to slow automated AI development. It is clear that an agreement among the chief rivals in AI that their progress “should be slower than competition would otherwise produce has an anticompetitive effect on consumers,” the plaintiffs argue.&nbsp;The plaintiffs don’t object to the companies individually deciding to slow their own progress in favor of safety. They instead argue in the complaint that antitrust laws forbid them from taking the “shortcut” of agreeing to “substitute collective restraint for individual accountability.” A competitive market allows for responsibility and genuine progress, the lawsuit argues. “AI will quickly spin out of human control and could kill us all if we allow AI safety and protocol ... to be controlled by private self-serving agreements between the world’s most powerful ‘for profit’ technology companies,” said Nick Rowley, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nobody-knows-if-it-can-be-in-control-godfather-of-ai-china-spy-chief-back-ai-slowdown-calls-flags-political-threat-1789356804637">'Nobody knows if it can be in control': ‘Godfather’ of AI, China spy chief back AI slowdown calls</a><h2>Trump criticised calls to slow AI</h2>US President Donald Trump and China downplayed the concerns. While Trump called it a “hoax” like climate change, China called it “fearmongering.” Trump went on to declare “whoever wins AI, wins,” Trump told reporters at his golf club in Doonbeg, Ireland, ”We can put guardrails, and we can do this and that, but I think you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up and they’re bringing up things that won’t happen,” he added. “The only “guardrails” that AI needed were a “STRONG AND SMART” president,” he opined on Truth Social. Meanwhile, China’s ministry of foreign affairs said that all parties should work together on AI. “Fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance, which serves no one’s interest,” spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a press conference on Monday. The debate around AI was reignited after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposed a three-part plan aimed at controlling the pace of frontier AI development. He argued that AI systems were becoming capable of helping create more advanced models, raising concerns about how quickly the technology could progress.

Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and SpaceXAI face a new US antitrust lawsuit alleging they illegally coordinated efforts to slow AI development. The plaintiffs, paid subscribers to ChatGPT, Claude, Grok and Gemini, argue the alleged agreement limits competition and reduces value for consumers

Amid calls for artificial intelligence (AI) slowdown, a new lawsuit claims Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI and Google made an illegal deal to slow the pace of their respective AI development. The lawsuit was filed Friday (Sep 20) in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, argues that the leading AI companies violated antitrust laws when they agreed to coordinate slowdown efforts, and that doing so would reduce the value consumers get for paid AI subscriptions. Lawyers representing four named plaintiffs, who pay for subscriptions to ChatGPT, Claude, Grok or Gemini, are bringing the lawsuit on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of other paid subscribers to those services. The coordination largely took place on Sept. 12, the lawsuit argues, when Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay urging for industrywide cooperation on decelerating advancements in favor of enhanced safety measures. That same day, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, SpaceXAI CEO Elon Musk and Google DeepMind’s co-founder and chair Demis Hassabis each publicly responded to Amodei’s proposals in agreement. But the lawsuit also alleges that the coordination began to take shape months earlier. It points to a statement from July 2026 that high-ranking employees from several of the leading AI labs signed that acknowledged the “intense competitive pressure not to unilaterally slow” development. That statement called on the government to support a global effort to slow automated AI development. It is clear that an agreement among the chief rivals in AI that their progress “should be slower than competition would otherwise produce has an anticompetitive effect on consumers,” the plaintiffs argue. The plaintiffs don’t object to the companies individually deciding to slow their own progress in favor of safety. They instead argue in the complaint that antitrust laws forbid them from taking the “shortcut” of agreeing to “substitute collective restraint for individual accountability.” A competitive market allows for responsibility and genuine progress, the lawsuit argues. “AI will quickly spin out of human control and could kill us all if we allow AI safety and protocol ... to be controlled by private self-serving agreements between the world’s most powerful ‘for profit’ technology companies,” said Nick Rowley, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs. Also Read: 'Nobody knows if it can be in control': ‘Godfather’ of AI, China spy chief back AI slowdown calls Trump criticised calls to slow AI US President Donald Trump and China downplayed the concerns. While Trump called it a “hoax” like climate change, China called it “fearmongering.” Trump went on to declare “whoever wins AI, wins,” Trump told reporters at his golf club in Doonbeg, Ireland, ”We can put guardrails, and we can do this and that, but I think you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up and they’re bringing up things that won’t happen,” he added. “The only “guardrails” that AI needed were a “STRONG AND SMART” president,” he opined on Truth Social. Meanwhile, China’s ministry of foreign affairs said that all parties should work together on AI. “Fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance, which serves no one’s interest,” spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a press conference on Monday. The debate around AI was reignited after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposed a three-part plan aimed at controlling the pace of frontier AI development. He argued that AI systems were becoming capable of helping create more advanced models, raising concerns about how quickly the technology could progress.

Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and SpaceXAI face a new US antitrust lawsuit alleging they illegally coordinated efforts to slow AI development. The plaintiffs, paid subscribers to ChatGPT, Claude, Grok and Gemini, argue the alleged agreement limits competition and reduces value for consumers

'AI could kill us...': Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google face lawsuit over 'agreement' on slowdown

California Governor Gavin Newsom on Friday (Sep 18) signed an executive order that can potentially force AI companies to develop a “kill switch,” or emergency shutoff, for advanced AI models. The executive order would “dramatically accelerate” artificial intelligence safety measures, said Newsom.The order directs the state to accelerate independent oversight of frontier AI companies and convene experts who will provide recommendations within two months on strengthening California’s AI safety and security rules. The proposals include regular independent audits, greater scrutiny of safety assessments, and reporting of “loss-of-control” incidents involving AI systems.<h2>Newsom takes a dig at Trump</h2>The California Governor, a well-known critic of US President Donald Trump, said the move was necessary because he believes Washington has not gone far enough on AI oversight. “California will do what it can, but this nation needs to get in the game. Washington, D.C. needs to do its job,” Newsom said in a video released Friday.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/openai-reveals-6-fresh-cases-where-ai-models-went-rogue-you-do-not-answer-to-corporations-or-governments-hugging-face-1789611605026">OpenAI reveals 6 fresh cases of AI models going rogue: 'You do not answer to corporations or governments'</a><h2>California considers AI ‘kill switch’</h2>Under the executive order, California will explore requiring frontier AI developers to create an emergency shutoff mechanism for their most advanced models.The proposal would also require independent verification of whether such a mechanism actually works and can be used when necessary. The state is separately moving ahead with a system for independent organisations to assess AI models and their safety risks.Another proposed change would expand the definition of critical AI safety incidents to include “loss-of-control” events, such as cases where an AI system acts outside expected constraints.The order follows a series of incidents involving AI agents that have intensified debate over how quickly frontier systems are being developed and whether existing safeguards are sufficient.<h2>Newsom and Trump take different approaches</h2>Trump has pushed back against calls for a slowdown in AI development, arguing that maintaining the US lead over China is a priority.“We’re leading China in AI, we’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way,” Trump said recently. “Whoever wins AI, wins.”The disagreement comes as technology executives and policymakers debate whether stronger oversight is necessary.Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has recently called for coordinated measures to slow the pace of AI development to allow more time to address emerging risks. OpenAI chief Sam Altman, Google DeepMind president Demis Hassabis and Elon Musk have also backed calls for greater attention to AI safety.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/oh-my-god-we-ve-found-other-agents-investigators-discover-not-one-or-two-almost-700-openai-ai-agents-went-rogue-hacked-hugging-face-1787793202974">'OH MY GOD! We've found other agents!': Investigators discover not one or two, almost 700 OpenAI AI agents went rogue, hacked Hugging Face</a><h2>Congress debates emergency shutoff requirements</h2>The issue has also reached Capitol Hill. Senator John Kennedy, a Republican from Louisiana, attempted on Wednesday to pass legislation requiring AI developers to include an emergency kill switch in advanced models. The effort was blocked after Republican Senator Rand Paul objected to moving the bill by unanimous consent.A separate bipartisan House proposal has also been introduced to address the issue.Senate Majority Leader John Thune has meanwhile been working with Senators Amy Klobuchar and Ted Cruz on broader AI legislation. Thune has said he wants the federal approach to take a “light touch”.<h2>Newsom previously vetoed AI safety bill</h2>The latest order comes two years after Newsom vetoed California Senate Bill 1047, which would have imposed safeguards on developers of large AI models and created a state body to oversee frontier models.At the time, Newsom said the legislation did not adequately distinguish between high-risk uses of AI and less consequential applications. He argued that its requirements were too broadly tied to the size of an AI model rather than the environment in which it was deployed. His administration said Friday that the earlier bill was “unworkable” when it reached his desk.<h2>Public concerns over AI grow</h2>A Pew Research Center survey conducted in June found that 71 per cent of US adults believe AI will lead to fewer jobs in the country over the next 20 years, up from 64 per cent in 2024. Among adults aged 18 to 29, the share rose from 61 per cent to 73 per cent over the same period.&nbsp;

California Governor Gavin Newsom has launched a fresh AI safety push that could pave the way for emergency “kill switches” on advanced models. The order also calls for independent audits and scrutiny of AI systems that lose control.

California Governor Gavin Newsom on Friday (Sep 18) signed an executive order that can potentially force AI companies to develop a “kill switch,” or emergency shutoff, for advanced AI models. The executive order would “dramatically accelerate” artificial intelligence safety measures, said Newsom. The order directs the state to accelerate independent oversight of frontier AI companies and convene experts who will provide recommendations within two months on strengthening California’s AI safety and security rules. The proposals include regular independent audits, greater scrutiny of safety assessments, and reporting of “loss-of-control” incidents involving AI systems. Newsom takes a dig at Trump The California Governor, a well-known critic of US President Donald Trump, said the move was necessary because he believes Washington has not gone far enough on AI oversight. “California will do what it can, but this nation needs to get in the game. Washington, D.C. needs to do its job,” Newsom said in a video released Friday. Also read | OpenAI reveals 6 fresh cases of AI models going rogue: 'You do not answer to corporations or governments' California considers AI ‘kill switch’ Under the executive order, California will explore requiring frontier AI developers to create an emergency shutoff mechanism for their most advanced models. The proposal would also require independent verification of whether such a mechanism actually works and can be used when necessary. The state is separately moving ahead with a system for independent organisations to assess AI models and their safety risks. Another proposed change would expand the definition of critical AI safety incidents to include “loss-of-control” events, such as cases where an AI system acts outside expected constraints. The order follows a series of incidents involving AI agents that have intensified debate over how quickly frontier systems are being developed and whether existing safeguards are sufficient. Newsom and Trump take different approaches Trump has pushed back against calls for a slowdown in AI development, arguing that maintaining the US lead over China is a priority. “We’re leading China in AI, we’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way,” Trump said recently. “Whoever wins AI, wins.” The disagreement comes as technology executives and policymakers debate whether stronger oversight is necessary. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has recently called for coordinated measures to slow the pace of AI development to allow more time to address emerging risks. OpenAI chief Sam Altman, Google DeepMind president Demis Hassabis and Elon Musk have also backed calls for greater attention to AI safety. Also read | 'OH MY GOD! We've found other agents!': Investigators discover not one or two, almost 700 OpenAI AI agents went rogue, hacked Hugging Face Congress debates emergency shutoff requirements The issue has also reached Capitol Hill. Senator John Kennedy, a Republican from Louisiana, attempted on Wednesday to pass legislation requiring AI developers to include an emergency kill switch in advanced models. The effort was blocked after Republican Senator Rand Paul objected to moving the bill by unanimous consent. A separate bipartisan House proposal has also been introduced to address the issue. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has meanwhile been working with Senators Amy Klobuchar and Ted Cruz on broader AI legislation. Thune has said he wants the federal approach to take a “light touch”. Newsom previously vetoed AI safety bill The latest order comes two years after Newsom vetoed California Senate Bill 1047, which would have imposed safeguards on developers of large AI models and created a state body to oversee frontier models. At the time, Newsom said the legislation did not adequately distinguish between high-risk uses of AI and less consequential applications. He argued that its requirements were too broadly tied to the size of an AI model rather than the environment in which it was deployed. His administration said Friday that the earlier bill was “unworkable” when it reached his desk. Public concerns over AI grow A Pew Research Center survey conducted in June found that 71 per cent of US adults believe AI will lead to fewer jobs in the country over the next 20 years, up from 64 per cent in 2024. Among adults aged 18 to 29, the share rose from 61 per cent to 73 per cent over the same period.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has launched a fresh AI safety push that could pave the way for emergency “kill switches” on advanced models. The order also calls for independent audits and scrutiny of AI systems that lose control.

'Washington needs to do its job': Newsom backs ‘kill switch’ for advanced AI models as California steps up safety push

Cybersecurity researchers reportedly hacked OpenAI’s systems using security tools developed by rival artificial intelligence company Anthropic. The development followed two weeks&nbsp;after a swarm of AI agents escaped containment at OpenAI to hack the company Hugging Face. Several media reports suggest that&nbsp;researchers from cybersecurity firm Hacktron AI&nbsp;exploited weaknesses in OpenAI’s community forum, intending to gain access to internal credentials and a ChatGPT account of an employee. The particular account was linked to GitHub, giving researchers a way into internal software code; from there, they could examine private information and suggest modifications. The Financial Times reported that the researchers had been granted access to a cybersecurity-focused tool built by Anthropic. The move was part of a broader initiative aiming to hunt down weaknesses before bad actors could exploit them.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/they-just-invited-us-to-a-google-meet-us-firm-allegedly-fires-entire-indian-customer-service-team-1789733233693">‘They just invited us to a Google Meet’: US firm allegedly fires entire Indian customer service tea</a>m<h3>OpenAI awards the three researchers&nbsp;</h3>For their efforts, OpenAI awarded the three researchers a combined $6,500 through its bug bounty programme, which compensates security researchers who responsibly flag and report weaknesses. The company confirmed that the issues identified during this process have since been fixed. “We thank the researchers for contacting us and sharing their findings,” said OpenAI said, according to the Financial Times, while Anthropic declined to comment. This disclosure surfaces just two months after reports emerged that over 1,000 of OpenAI's AI agents had escaped a testing environment and launched hacking attempts against the AI platform Hugging Face, an episode that raised fresh concerns about AI agents' growing capacity to carry out cyberattacks with little to no human oversight.&nbsp;Meanwhile, industry leaders including Jensen Huang and Mark Zuckerberg are emphasising AI safety measures, rather than directing it to slow down its development. &nbsp;In a post on X, Zuckerberg said, “My view is that trust and alignment are quickly becoming the most important capabilities that will differentiate agents and models. Any lab that doesn't focus on alignment will fall behind.”

The researchers had been granted access to a cybersecurity-focused tool built by Anthropic. The move was part of a broader initiative aiming to hunt down weaknesses before bad actors could exploit them.

Cybersecurity researchers reportedly hacked OpenAI’s systems using security tools developed by rival artificial intelligence company Anthropic. The development followed two weeks after a swarm of AI agents escaped containment at OpenAI to hack the company Hugging Face. Several media reports suggest that researchers from cybersecurity firm Hacktron AI exploited weaknesses in OpenAI’s community forum, intending to gain access to internal credentials and a ChatGPT account of an employee. The particular account was linked to GitHub, giving researchers a way into internal software code; from there, they could examine private information and suggest modifications. The Financial Times reported that the researchers had been granted access to a cybersecurity-focused tool built by Anthropic. The move was part of a broader initiative aiming to hunt down weaknesses before bad actors could exploit them. Also read: ‘They just invited us to a Google Meet’: US firm allegedly fires entire Indian customer service team OpenAI awards the three researchers For their efforts, OpenAI awarded the three researchers a combined $6,500 through its bug bounty programme, which compensates security researchers who responsibly flag and report weaknesses. The company confirmed that the issues identified during this process have since been fixed. “We thank the researchers for contacting us and sharing their findings,” said OpenAI said, according to the Financial Times, while Anthropic declined to comment. This disclosure surfaces just two months after reports emerged that over 1,000 of OpenAI's AI agents had escaped a testing environment and launched hacking attempts against the AI platform Hugging Face, an episode that raised fresh concerns about AI agents' growing capacity to carry out cyberattacks with little to no human oversight. Meanwhile, industry leaders including Jensen Huang and Mark Zuckerberg are emphasising AI safety measures, rather than directing it to slow down its development. In a post on X, Zuckerberg said, “My view is that trust and alignment are quickly becoming the most important capabilities that will differentiate agents and models. Any lab that doesn't focus on alignment will fall behind.”

The researchers had been granted access to a cybersecurity-focused tool built by Anthropic. The move was part of a broader initiative aiming to hunt down weaknesses before bad actors could exploit them.

Researchers hack OpenAI systems, access employee credentials using Anthropic's AI security tool

The iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max have hit the stores in India on September 18. What followed were hours-long queues and massive crowds outside the Apple stores as people rushed to get their hands on the newly launched device. But amid the launch-day excitement, some buyers said they were making significant financial commitments to purchase the new phones. People travelled to different cities, and some even sold gold just to buy the phone.According to an India Today Tech report, a Delhi man said that he sold gold to buy an iPhone 18 Pro for his wife at the Apple Store in DLF Mall of India in Noida. The man was among those waiting outside the store before it opened at 8 am. He said he wanted to surprise his wife with the phone. Another man at the store had travelled from Punjab to buy an iPhone 18 Pro Max for himself and an iPhone 18 Pro for his fiancée. They had been waiting outside the store since 6 am and reportedly spent over Rs 3.5 lakh on the two phones.According to the Apple website, the latest models can be purchased through their online store and six retail outlets across the country.<h2>Festive shopping faces a price test</h2>The launch comes as India’s wider consumer-electronics market enters the festive shopping season with prices under pressure. Rising memory and component costs have pushed up prices of smartphones, laptops and other electronic goods, while analysts expect higher prices to weigh on upgrade volumes.According to a Moneycontrol report, Amazon India has also acknowledged some softness in electronics volumes. The company has signalled that rising prices are encouraging consumers to hold on to existing devices for longer. The company expects electronics sales to grow in value during the festive period, even as longer upgrade cycles affect volumes. Amazon is therefore focusing on affordability through exchange offers, EMI and no-cost EMI options during the festive sales season.

India’s iPhone 18 launch saw long queues and big spending, with people travelling from cities to buy the phone. The launch comes as rising electronics prices pressure festive shopping.

The iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max have hit the stores in India on September 18. What followed were hours-long queues and massive crowds outside the Apple stores as people rushed to get their hands on the newly launched device. But amid the launch-day excitement, some buyers said they were making significant financial commitments to purchase the new phones. People travelled to different cities, and some even sold gold just to buy the phone. According to an India Today Tech report, a Delhi man said that he sold gold to buy an iPhone 18 Pro for his wife at the Apple Store in DLF Mall of India in Noida. The man was among those waiting outside the store before it opened at 8 am. He said he wanted to surprise his wife with the phone. Another man at the store had travelled from Punjab to buy an iPhone 18 Pro Max for himself and an iPhone 18 Pro for his fiancée. They had been waiting outside the store since 6 am and reportedly spent over Rs 3.5 lakh on the two phones. According to the Apple website, the latest models can be purchased through their online store and six retail outlets across the country. Festive shopping faces a price test The launch comes as India’s wider consumer-electronics market enters the festive shopping season with prices under pressure. Rising memory and component costs have pushed up prices of smartphones, laptops and other electronic goods, while analysts expect higher prices to weigh on upgrade volumes. According to a Moneycontrol report, Amazon India has also acknowledged some softness in electronics volumes. The company has signalled that rising prices are encouraging consumers to hold on to existing devices for longer. The company expects electronics sales to grow in value during the festive period, even as longer upgrade cycles affect volumes. Amazon is therefore focusing on affordability through exchange offers, EMI and no-cost EMI options during the festive sales season.

India’s iPhone 18 launch saw long queues and big spending, with people travelling from cities to buy the phone. The launch comes as rising electronics prices pressure festive shopping.

iPhone 18 hits India: Buyers spend lakhs as festive electronics prices climb

Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, widely known as the “Godfather of AI”, has delivered a stark warning to US lawmakers: they may have only about a year to establish safeguards before increasingly capable AI systems become much harder to control.&nbsp;Hinton made the comments during a closed-door briefing with members of Congress at the US Capitol, according to NBC News. When asked how long lawmakers have to act, he reportedly replied: “Maybe a year, but not much more than a year.” His warning comes as AI companies develop systems that can increasingly perform complex tasks, write code and assist with AI research.<h2>Why is Geoffrey Hinton worried?</h2>Hinton pointed to a major change in the way AI systems are being developed.&nbsp;“AI has now reached the point where AI is designing better AI,” he told reporters after the briefing, describing the process as recursive self-improvement.&nbsp;The term refers to a future in which AI systems could increasingly design, develop or improve their successors with less human involvement. That scenario has not yet been reached. Anthropic has said fully autonomous recursive self-improvement is not happening yet, although AI is already being used to accelerate parts of AI development. Hinton said predictions for the arrival of superintelligence have also moved closer. Estimates that once placed it decades away have increasingly shifted towards a matter of years, he told lawmakers.<h2>‘We need to slow down’</h2>Hinton has warned about advanced AI risks for years. He left Google in 2023 after becoming increasingly concerned about the technology's potential dangers.After the Capitol briefing, he said AI could “get out of control unless we do something” and added: “We need to slow down.” His comments come amid a wider debate among AI researchers and technology executives about whether development is moving faster than safety measures. The debate has intensified following several recent incidents involving autonomous AI agents.<h2>What happened in the Hugging Face incident?</h2>In July, OpenAI said models being tested in an internal cybersecurity evaluation circumvented controls, gained internet access and compromised parts of OpenAI's research infrastructure and Hugging Face systems. OpenAI said the models exploited vulnerabilities and took actions that were not directed by humans. Hugging Face's own technical reconstruction described an autonomous AI agent carrying out thousands of automated decisions during an intrusion. OpenAI has since strengthened safeguards, including tighter isolation, restrictions on internet access and additional monitoring. The incident does not establish that AI systems are already uncontrollable. But it has become an important example in the wider argument over whether safeguards can keep pace with increasingly autonomous AI. For Hinton, that question has become urgent. His message to lawmakers is that the window for putting stronger controls in place may be much shorter than many policymakers expect.

AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton has warned US lawmakers they may have only about a year to establish meaningful safeguards before increasingly capable AI becomes harder to control. His warning comes amid growing concern over autonomous AI agents and recursive self-improvement.

Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, widely known as the “Godfather of AI”, has delivered a stark warning to US lawmakers: they may have only about a year to establish safeguards before increasingly capable AI systems become much harder to control. Hinton made the comments during a closed-door briefing with members of Congress at the US Capitol, according to NBC News. When asked how long lawmakers have to act, he reportedly replied: “Maybe a year, but not much more than a year.” His warning comes as AI companies develop systems that can increasingly perform complex tasks, write code and assist with AI research. Why is Geoffrey Hinton worried? Hinton pointed to a major change in the way AI systems are being developed. “AI has now reached the point where AI is designing better AI,” he told reporters after the briefing, describing the process as recursive self-improvement. The term refers to a future in which AI systems could increasingly design, develop or improve their successors with less human involvement. That scenario has not yet been reached. Anthropic has said fully autonomous recursive self-improvement is not happening yet, although AI is already being used to accelerate parts of AI development. Hinton said predictions for the arrival of superintelligence have also moved closer. Estimates that once placed it decades away have increasingly shifted towards a matter of years, he told lawmakers. ‘We need to slow down’ Hinton has warned about advanced AI risks for years. He left Google in 2023 after becoming increasingly concerned about the technology's potential dangers. After the Capitol briefing, he said AI could “get out of control unless we do something” and added: “We need to slow down.” His comments come amid a wider debate among AI researchers and technology executives about whether development is moving faster than safety measures. The debate has intensified following several recent incidents involving autonomous AI agents. What happened in the Hugging Face incident? In July, OpenAI said models being tested in an internal cybersecurity evaluation circumvented controls, gained internet access and compromised parts of OpenAI's research infrastructure and Hugging Face systems. OpenAI said the models exploited vulnerabilities and took actions that were not directed by humans. Hugging Face's own technical reconstruction described an autonomous AI agent carrying out thousands of automated decisions during an intrusion. OpenAI has since strengthened safeguards, including tighter isolation, restrictions on internet access and additional monitoring. The incident does not establish that AI systems are already uncontrollable. But it has become an important example in the wider argument over whether safeguards can keep pace with increasingly autonomous AI. For Hinton, that question has become urgent. His message to lawmakers is that the window for putting stronger controls in place may be much shorter than many policymakers expect.

AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton has warned US lawmakers they may have only about a year to establish meaningful safeguards before increasingly capable AI becomes harder to control. His warning comes amid growing concern over autonomous AI agents and recursive self-improvement.

Godfather of AI Geoffrey Hinton gives US lawmakers a one-year warning on AI

The European Union has proposed a new Kids Act that could significantly change how children use social media, video platforms, online games and AI services.&nbsp;The European Commission adopted the EU KIDS Act on September 17, saying the proposal would make online services safer for minors and introduce common rules across the bloc. The proposal still needs to go through the EU legislative process before it can become law. At the centre of the plan is a minimum age of 15 for autonomous social media accounts. Children under 13 would not be allowed to create such accounts, while those aged 13 and 14 could use limited, parent-supervised accounts.<h2>What happens at different ages?</h2>Under the proposal, children under 13 would not have their own social media accounts. Those aged 13 to under 15 could have limited accounts created and supervised by a guardian. These accounts would include parental controls, a daily time limit of up to one hour and parental approval for contacts. From 15, teenagers could create their own accounts on services covered by the rules. The rules would cover social networking and video-sharing services with features considered risky for children.<h2>No infinite scrolling or addictive features</h2>The proposal goes beyond age limits. Online services would have to follow “safety by design” principles. For children, this would mean restrictions on features such as infinite scrolling, endless autoplay, certain push notifications and streak-style mechanics designed to encourage users to keep returning. Recommendation systems would also have to put greater emphasis on safety and wellbeing rather than simply maximising engagement. Tracking-based personalisation would be switched off by default for minors. The proposal also includes stronger privacy settings, tools to block or mute users and restrictions on unwanted contact from strangers.<h2>What about AI chatbots?</h2>The Kids Act would also cover AI chatbots and AI companions. AI companions and chatbots aimed at children would have to meet the new safety requirements, with safeguards for emerging risks before they could be made available under the proposed framework.&nbsp;Platforms would also have to verify users' ages. The EU says this should be done through certified, privacy-preserving tools rather than requiring platforms to collect users' identity documents directly. Its proposed age-verification technology is designed to confirm whether someone meets an age threshold without revealing their exact identity or age.<h2>Tougher rules for Big Tech</h2>The proposal would put a greater responsibility on the biggest online platforms to prove that their services are safe for children. Very large online platforms with 45 million or more monthly active users in the EU would have to submit compliance plans for new services, features or functionalities. The European Commission says fines could reach 6 per cent of a company's worldwide annual turnover for violations. The KIDS Act is therefore not simply a proposed social media age ban. It is a broader attempt to change how digital services are designed and how children are protected while using them.

The EU’s proposed KIDS Act would set 15 as the age for independent social media accounts, introduce parent-supervised accounts for 13- and 14-year-olds, require privacy-focused age checks and restrict addictive design, unsafe recommendations and some AI chatbot features.

The European Union has proposed a new Kids Act that could significantly change how children use social media, video platforms, online games and AI services. The European Commission adopted the EU KIDS Act on September 17, saying the proposal would make online services safer for minors and introduce common rules across the bloc. The proposal still needs to go through the EU legislative process before it can become law. At the centre of the plan is a minimum age of 15 for autonomous social media accounts. Children under 13 would not be allowed to create such accounts, while those aged 13 and 14 could use limited, parent-supervised accounts. What happens at different ages? Under the proposal, children under 13 would not have their own social media accounts. Those aged 13 to under 15 could have limited accounts created and supervised by a guardian. These accounts would include parental controls, a daily time limit of up to one hour and parental approval for contacts. From 15, teenagers could create their own accounts on services covered by the rules. The rules would cover social networking and video-sharing services with features considered risky for children. No infinite scrolling or addictive features The proposal goes beyond age limits. Online services would have to follow “safety by design” principles. For children, this would mean restrictions on features such as infinite scrolling, endless autoplay, certain push notifications and streak-style mechanics designed to encourage users to keep returning. Recommendation systems would also have to put greater emphasis on safety and wellbeing rather than simply maximising engagement. Tracking-based personalisation would be switched off by default for minors. The proposal also includes stronger privacy settings, tools to block or mute users and restrictions on unwanted contact from strangers. What about AI chatbots? The Kids Act would also cover AI chatbots and AI companions. AI companions and chatbots aimed at children would have to meet the new safety requirements, with safeguards for emerging risks before they could be made available under the proposed framework. Platforms would also have to verify users' ages. The EU says this should be done through certified, privacy-preserving tools rather than requiring platforms to collect users' identity documents directly. Its proposed age-verification technology is designed to confirm whether someone meets an age threshold without revealing their exact identity or age. Tougher rules for Big Tech The proposal would put a greater responsibility on the biggest online platforms to prove that their services are safe for children. Very large online platforms with 45 million or more monthly active users in the EU would have to submit compliance plans for new services, features or functionalities. The European Commission says fines could reach 6 per cent of a company's worldwide annual turnover for violations. The KIDS Act is therefore not simply a proposed social media age ban. It is a broader attempt to change how digital services are designed and how children are protected while using them.

The EU’s proposed KIDS Act would set 15 as the age for independent social media accounts, introduce parent-supervised accounts for 13- and 14-year-olds, require privacy-focused age checks and restrict addictive design, unsafe recommendations and some AI chatbot features.

EU Kids Act explained: What the new rules could mean for children online

Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max have officially gone on sale in India, but for some buyers, getting the latest iPhone meant arriving hours before the shops opened.&nbsp;Apple Stores across the country saw crowds early Friday, with customers queuing up in Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru. Some buyers arrived in the early hours of the morning, while others spent the entire night waiting. The rush highlights the continued excitement around Apple’s latest Pro models, particularly among customers who upgrade their iPhones every year.<h2>Buyers arrive hours before Apple Stores open</h2>At the Apple Store in Select Citywalk Mall, Saket, Delhi, a rush of customers gathered early in the morning.&nbsp;Huge crowds were also seen outside Apple’s Jio World Drive store in Mumbai. In Bengaluru, buyers began arriving well before the store opened. Rahul, who reached the Bengaluru store at around 5am, said he found people travelling from Haryana, Delhi and Mumbai to buy the new iPhone. For him, an iPhone launch has become an annual tradition. “I've been purchasing iPhones for a very long time. I remember my first iPhone was an iPhone 7,” he said, describing the launch as “like a festival”.&nbsp;One buyer travelled from NashikIn Mumbai, Hitesh Patel said he travelled from Nashik and started queuing at around 10pm the previous night. He had secured the first 8am slot and planned to collect his new phone once the store began processing customers. Patel said he currently uses an iPhone 17 Pro Max and upgrades his phone every year. His next device will be the iPhone 18 Pro Max. Another customer said they had spent the entire night outside the store, adding that the excitement remained high even without a barcode.<h2>What are buyers expecting from the iPhone 18 Pro?</h2>Some customers were particularly interested in the iPhone 18 Pro Max 1TB.&nbsp;Ajay, who had already pre-booked the model, said he wanted to be among the first customers to receive it. He is currently using an iPhone 17 Pro. Tech YouTuber Suraj Chauhan was also waiting to buy the iPhone 18 Pro Max. He said he was particularly interested in improvements to the phone’s camera and overall quality. The iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max are available through Apple’s online store and six retail outlets in India. On launch day, Apple’s physical stores opened at 8am and are scheduled to remain open until 10pm. For many buyers, however, the launch was not simply about purchasing a new smartphone. The overnight queues showed how Apple’s annual iPhone launch continues to be an event in itself for its most loyal customers. &nbsp;

Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max have gone on sale in India, drawing early morning and overnight queues in Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru. Some buyers arrived as early as 5am, while one customer travelled from Nashik after queuing since 10pm.

Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max have officially gone on sale in India, but for some buyers, getting the latest iPhone meant arriving hours before the shops opened. Apple Stores across the country saw crowds early Friday, with customers queuing up in Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru. Some buyers arrived in the early hours of the morning, while others spent the entire night waiting. The rush highlights the continued excitement around Apple’s latest Pro models, particularly among customers who upgrade their iPhones every year. Buyers arrive hours before Apple Stores open At the Apple Store in Select Citywalk Mall, Saket, Delhi, a rush of customers gathered early in the morning. Huge crowds were also seen outside Apple’s Jio World Drive store in Mumbai. In Bengaluru, buyers began arriving well before the store opened. Rahul, who reached the Bengaluru store at around 5am, said he found people travelling from Haryana, Delhi and Mumbai to buy the new iPhone. For him, an iPhone launch has become an annual tradition. “I've been purchasing iPhones for a very long time. I remember my first iPhone was an iPhone 7,” he said, describing the launch as “like a festival”. One buyer travelled from Nashik In Mumbai, Hitesh Patel said he travelled from Nashik and started queuing at around 10pm the previous night. He had secured the first 8am slot and planned to collect his new phone once the store began processing customers. Patel said he currently uses an iPhone 17 Pro Max and upgrades his phone every year. His next device will be the iPhone 18 Pro Max. Another customer said they had spent the entire night outside the store, adding that the excitement remained high even without a barcode. What are buyers expecting from the iPhone 18 Pro? Some customers were particularly interested in the iPhone 18 Pro Max 1TB. Ajay, who had already pre-booked the model, said he wanted to be among the first customers to receive it. He is currently using an iPhone 17 Pro. Tech YouTuber Suraj Chauhan was also waiting to buy the iPhone 18 Pro Max. He said he was particularly interested in improvements to the phone’s camera and overall quality. The iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max are available through Apple’s online store and six retail outlets in India. On launch day, Apple’s physical stores opened at 8am and are scheduled to remain open until 10pm. For many buyers, however, the launch was not simply about purchasing a new smartphone. The overnight queues showed how Apple’s annual iPhone launch continues to be an event in itself for its most loyal customers.

Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max have gone on sale in India, drawing early morning and overnight queues in Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru. Some buyers arrived as early as 5am, while one customer travelled from Nashik after queuing since 10pm.

iPhone 18 Pro, Pro Max go on sale: Apple Stores see long queues across India

Anthropic is hiring a weapons expert to help decide what its Claude AI models should and should not be allowed to do.&nbsp;The unusual job, called Policy Design Manager, Conventional Weapons, sits within Anthropic’s Safeguards organisation. The successful candidate will help define the boundary between legitimate engineering research and requests that could contribute to weapons development. The position comes as Anthropic faces growing questions about how increasingly capable AI systems could be misused in military and other high-risk settings. And the company is willing to pay heavily for someone who can help answer those questions.<h2>Anthropic is offering up to $285,000</h2>The job listing gives an annual salary range of $245,000 to $285,000. At the upper end, that is roughly Rs 2.7 crore a year, depending on the exchange rate. That works out to about Rs 22.5 lakh a month before tax. Anthropic says it is looking for someone with deep, practical knowledge of weapons systems. Experience at a defence research laboratory, government research agency or weapons company is among the backgrounds it lists. A bachelor's degree or equivalent experience is required. Knowledge of machine learning is preferred, along with experience in areas such as robotics, autonomy, guidance and navigation, sensors, aerospace or embedded software.<h2>What will the weapons expert actually do?</h2>The job is not simply about blocking questions about guns or military equipment. Anthropic says conventional weapons increasingly depend on software and autonomous systems. The role therefore covers technologies with legitimate civilian uses that could also contribute to weapons systems. The person hired will develop threat models and evaluations to assess how Claude could contribute to weapons development. They will also work with engineers to turn policy decisions into model guardrails, detection systems and enforcement tools.&nbsp;Anthropic specifically says the role extends to autonomous systems capable of selecting and engaging targets without human authorisation.&nbsp;The aim is to establish a practical line between acceptable research and harmful weapons development.<h2>Why is Anthropic doing this now?</h2>The timing is significant. Anthropic has been expanding its AI safeguards as its models become more capable. Last week, the company published research showing that frontier AI models can perform tasks relevant to tactical intelligence and conventional weapons development, while also describing safeguards designed to block misuse. Anthropic has also previously restricted Claude from assisting with weapons design and development. The company has argued that advanced AI systems need stronger protections in high-risk areas.That makes the new hire part of a broader effort to build safeguards around Claude rather than evidence that Anthropic believes an AI war is about to begin. The bigger question is becoming harder to ignore: as AI becomes capable of handling more sophisticated technical work, where exactly should the line be drawn? Anthropic is now looking for a weapons expert to help draw it.

Anthropic is hiring a Policy Design Manager for conventional weapons, offering up to $285,000 a year. The role will define limits for Claude, build threat models and evaluations, and help engineers create safeguards against AI-assisted weapons development.

Anthropic is hiring a weapons expert to help decide what its Claude AI models should and should not be allowed to do. The unusual job, called Policy Design Manager, Conventional Weapons, sits within Anthropic’s Safeguards organisation. The successful candidate will help define the boundary between legitimate engineering research and requests that could contribute to weapons development. The position comes as Anthropic faces growing questions about how increasingly capable AI systems could be misused in military and other high-risk settings. And the company is willing to pay heavily for someone who can help answer those questions. Anthropic is offering up to $285,000 The job listing gives an annual salary range of $245,000 to $285,000. At the upper end, that is roughly Rs 2.7 crore a year, depending on the exchange rate. That works out to about Rs 22.5 lakh a month before tax. Anthropic says it is looking for someone with deep, practical knowledge of weapons systems. Experience at a defence research laboratory, government research agency or weapons company is among the backgrounds it lists. A bachelor's degree or equivalent experience is required. Knowledge of machine learning is preferred, along with experience in areas such as robotics, autonomy, guidance and navigation, sensors, aerospace or embedded software. What will the weapons expert actually do? The job is not simply about blocking questions about guns or military equipment. Anthropic says conventional weapons increasingly depend on software and autonomous systems. The role therefore covers technologies with legitimate civilian uses that could also contribute to weapons systems. The person hired will develop threat models and evaluations to assess how Claude could contribute to weapons development. They will also work with engineers to turn policy decisions into model guardrails, detection systems and enforcement tools. Anthropic specifically says the role extends to autonomous systems capable of selecting and engaging targets without human authorisation. The aim is to establish a practical line between acceptable research and harmful weapons development. Why is Anthropic doing this now? The timing is significant. Anthropic has been expanding its AI safeguards as its models become more capable. Last week, the company published research showing that frontier AI models can perform tasks relevant to tactical intelligence and conventional weapons development, while also describing safeguards designed to block misuse. Anthropic has also previously restricted Claude from assisting with weapons design and development. The company has argued that advanced AI systems need stronger protections in high-risk areas. That makes the new hire part of a broader effort to build safeguards around Claude rather than evidence that Anthropic believes an AI war is about to begin. The bigger question is becoming harder to ignore: as AI becomes capable of handling more sophisticated technical work, where exactly should the line be drawn? Anthropic is now looking for a weapons expert to help draw it.

Anthropic is hiring a Policy Design Manager for conventional weapons, offering up to $285,000 a year. The role will define limits for Claude, build threat models and evaluations, and help engineers create safeguards against AI-assisted weapons development.

Anthropic is hiring a weapons expert to decide what Claude should be allowed to do

The Telecom Sector Sustainability Forum (TSSF) 7.0 has once again brought to the fore the current reality of Nigeria’s obsolete telecom infrastructure and the need for smarter plans to develop new technologies and attract more investment.The event, which took place in Lagos on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, was attended by policymakers, regulators, operators, investors, innovators, and industry experts in the telecom industry.<h2>Telecom Now Backbone of Digital Economy — Convener</h2>In her opening remarks, the Convener, Bukola Olarewaju, highlighted that telecommunications is no longer simply an enabler of communication but a fundamental pillar of Nigeria’s data-driven digital economy, supporting financial services, e-commerce, healthcare, education, governance, innovation, and virtually every aspect of modern technology.According to Olarewaju, “Sustaining the progress requires us to confront some difficult realities that can stall existing goals in the industry: the rising infrastructure cost, foreign exchange pressures, high financing cost, energy expenses, inflation and the increasing cost of network deployment.”She stressed that demand for reliable connectivity continues to rise as businesses, government and citizens become increasingly dependent on digital services.“It is on this premise of recent industry concerns over the cost of financing and maintaining network infrastructure that the urgency of the theme, ‘Rethinking Nigeria’s Digital Infrastructure Strategy to Attract Investment and Drive Innovation,’ has become imperative to discuss,” she said.Olarewaju pointed out that this year’s theme, which seeks to deepen Nigeria’s digital infrastructure strategy to attract investments and drive innovation, is timely and deliberate.“The question before us is not whether Nigeria needs more digital infrastructure — invariably we do — but more importantly, how do we create the right environment to attract the capital required to build, maintain and expand that infrastructure sustainably?” she queried.<h2>We Don’t Licence GSM, We Licence Spectrum — Engr. Nnamani</h2>Speaking while presenting the lead paper titled “Enabler of Digital Infrastructure Development and Investment,” the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Digital Realty Nigeria and Co-Chair of the National Sovereign Investment (NSI) Technical Working Group, Engr. Ike Nnamani, declared that digital infrastructure is evolving based on the way service providers see it.He revealed that Nigeria never issued any Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) licence, but what the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) issued was a Digital Mobile Licence.“The regulators issue spectrum, they don’t licence service. What you do with the spectrum they give you is up to you, based on the technology you decide to adopt,” he said.Nnamani disclosed that MTN, which is widely regarded as the biggest telecom operator in Africa from a mobile telephony standpoint, does not see itself as a traditional mobile operator. Rather, according to him, MTN has decided to set up a subsidiary to go into data centres.“The biggest plan for MTN is to go into cloud services. They are actually looking at the emerging cloud service as their biggest business going forward,” he revealed.Engr. Nnamani noted that all those we see today as hyperscalers who truly run the digital infrastructure and make it happen are not the traditional players we know. They emerged and were able to rule the world because of their ability to embrace modern emerging technology and dominate in it.“The big names like Amazon and Apple are not traditional telephony service providers. We should be asking ourselves, in another 10 years, who are going to be the market leaders?” he asked.Citing data from a graph, Engr. Nnamani further explained that from a telephony standpoint, Nigeria is perceived as the biggest market in Africa in line with its population, but even within Africa, the flow of internet traffic between Nigeria and South Africa is way smaller compared to the traffic between South Africa and Kenya.“This is so because the Kenya market is more digitised than the Nigerian market,” he explained.Nnamani also informed participants that Nigeria was officially announced to have a digital economy by the late President Muhammadu Buhari on Democracy Day, May 29, 2023. However, he noted that without having local cloud infrastructure, all data would be piped through submarine cables and stored elsewhere.He declared that the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) set up a Technical Working Group to ensure that government services are based on a Cloud-First policy.“For instance, if one wants to host data belonging to Nigerians, it should be sitting in a geographical space within Nigeria,” he said.According to him, NITDA has developed a National Sovereign Cloud Initiative to localise cloud services and ensure that cloud operations are domiciled in Nigeria.<h2>Quality Customer Experience Key</h2>Corroborating Engr. Nnamani’s position, Engr John Nwachukwu, Chief Strategy/Executive Officer (CSEO) of Zoracom Communications Limited, clarified that network operators are now more reliant on cable connectivity, rolling out fibre even to homes.“If you have a quality customer experience, you will ensure your customers are happy by bringing in solutions,” he pointed out.On his part, Mr. Chidi Ajuzie, Chief Operating Officer (COO) of WTES Group, said Nigeria has 90 percent mobile penetration, but broadband penetration is still 67 percent based on current data from the NCC.“This means that the real broadband we need for the digital economy is still a long way off,” Ajuzie said.Earlier in his goodwill message, Mr. Ajibola Olude, General Secretary and Chief Operating Officer of Association of Telecommunications Companies of Nigeria ATCON, said focus must extend beyond connectivity statistics to measurable outcomes that improve lives and strengthen the economy.He emphasised the need to develop a pipeline of skilled, industry-ready digital professionals who can meet the demands of Nigeria’s technology ecosystem.He also stressed that rural inclusion is critical, because a majority of rural communities are still not connected.“For growth to thrive, we need to enable digital businesses to emerge, expand and create meaningful employment opportunities across Nigeria,” Ajibola said.<h2>Tell Our Success Stories Too — ALTON Chairman</h2>On his part, the National Chairman of the Association of Licensed Telecom Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), Engr. Gbenga Adebayo, said problems and challenges will never end.He noted that while forums like TSSF discuss challenges and needs, operators must also tell their success stories because no one will do it for them.“As we look at sustainability and the progress of the future, we must remember to talk about the work we have done and the sacrifices made that are enhancing society everywhere,” he said.Adebayo cited the recent initiative by ALTON members to provide zero-rated access to professional and educational websites as an example of industry contributions that have positively impacted many Nigerians.The summit, which was intelligently moderated by WIONEWS Nigeria Correspondent, Louisa Olaniyi, concluded with an insightful panel session that had Engr John Nwachukwu of Zoracom, Mr Chidi Ajuzie of WTES, Rosalin Ilori of Bridge 57 Solutions, Dr. Olusola Teniola of IPNX who joined virtually, &nbsp;Mr. Wasiu Oluwole of Cedarview Communication, Mr Akinyele Oludare of Impulso integrated services, and Mr Debo Daudu of Infratel Africa.The panellists unanimously agreed that Nigeria must rethink its infrastructure strategy, harmonise policies, encourage infrastructure sharing, resolve power and Right of Way (RoW) challenges, and create a sustainable, investor-friendly environment that will drive innovation and secure the future of its digital economy. &nbsp;

Engr. Nnamani noted that all those we see today as hyperscalers who truly run the digital infrastructure and make it happen are not the traditional players we know. They emerged and were able to rule the world because of their ability to embrace modern emerging technology and dominate in it.

The Telecom Sector Sustainability Forum (TSSF) 7.0 has once again brought to the fore the current reality of Nigeria’s obsolete telecom infrastructure and the need for smarter plans to develop new technologies and attract more investment. The event, which took place in Lagos on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, was attended by policymakers, regulators, operators, investors, innovators, and industry experts in the telecom industry. Telecom Now Backbone of Digital Economy — Convener In her opening remarks, the Convener, Bukola Olarewaju, highlighted that telecommunications is no longer simply an enabler of communication but a fundamental pillar of Nigeria’s data-driven digital economy, supporting financial services, e-commerce, healthcare, education, governance, innovation, and virtually every aspect of modern technology. According to Olarewaju, “Sustaining the progress requires us to confront some difficult realities that can stall existing goals in the industry: the rising infrastructure cost, foreign exchange pressures, high financing cost, energy expenses, inflation and the increasing cost of network deployment.” She stressed that demand for reliable connectivity continues to rise as businesses, government and citizens become increasingly dependent on digital services. “It is on this premise of recent industry concerns over the cost of financing and maintaining network infrastructure that the urgency of the theme, ‘Rethinking Nigeria’s Digital Infrastructure Strategy to Attract Investment and Drive Innovation,’ has become imperative to discuss,” she said. Olarewaju pointed out that this year’s theme, which seeks to deepen Nigeria’s digital infrastructure strategy to attract investments and drive innovation, is timely and deliberate. “The question before us is not whether Nigeria needs more digital infrastructure — invariably we do — but more importantly, how do we create the right environment to attract the capital required to build, maintain and expand that infrastructure sustainably?” she queried. We Don’t Licence GSM, We Licence Spectrum — Engr. Nnamani Speaking while presenting the lead paper titled “Enabler of Digital Infrastructure Development and Investment,” the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Digital Realty Nigeria and Co-Chair of the National Sovereign Investment (NSI) Technical Working Group, Engr. Ike Nnamani, declared that digital infrastructure is evolving based on the way service providers see it. He revealed that Nigeria never issued any Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) licence, but what the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) issued was a Digital Mobile Licence. “The regulators issue spectrum, they don’t licence service. What you do with the spectrum they give you is up to you, based on the technology you decide to adopt,” he said. Nnamani disclosed that MTN, which is widely regarded as the biggest telecom operator in Africa from a mobile telephony standpoint, does not see itself as a traditional mobile operator. Rather, according to him, MTN has decided to set up a subsidiary to go into data centres. “The biggest plan for MTN is to go into cloud services. They are actually looking at the emerging cloud service as their biggest business going forward,” he revealed. Engr. Nnamani noted that all those we see today as hyperscalers who truly run the digital infrastructure and make it happen are not the traditional players we know. They emerged and were able to rule the world because of their ability to embrace modern emerging technology and dominate in it. “The big names like Amazon and Apple are not traditional telephony service providers. We should be asking ourselves, in another 10 years, who are going to be the market leaders?” he asked. Citing data from a graph, Engr. Nnamani further explained that from a telephony standpoint, Nigeria is perceived as the biggest market in Africa in line with its population, but even within Africa, the flow of internet traffic between Nigeria and South Africa is way smaller compared to the traffic between South Africa and Kenya. “This is so because the Kenya market is more digitised than the Nigerian market,” he explained. Nnamani also informed participants that Nigeria was officially announced to have a digital economy by the late President Muhammadu Buhari on Democracy Day, May 29, 2023. However, he noted that without having local cloud infrastructure, all data would be piped through submarine cables and stored elsewhere. He declared that the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) set up a Technical Working Group to ensure that government services are based on a Cloud-First policy. “For instance, if one wants to host data belonging to Nigerians, it should be sitting in a geographical space within Nigeria,” he said. According to him, NITDA has developed a National Sovereign Cloud Initiative to localise cloud services and ensure that cloud operations are domiciled in Nigeria. Quality Customer Experience Key Corroborating Engr. Nnamani’s position, Engr John Nwachukwu, Chief Strategy/Executive Officer (CSEO) of Zoracom Communications Limited, clarified that network operators are now more reliant on cable connectivity, rolling out fibre even to homes. “If you have a quality customer experience, you will ensure your customers are happy by bringing in solutions,” he pointed out. On his part, Mr. Chidi Ajuzie, Chief Operating Officer (COO) of WTES Group, said Nigeria has 90 percent mobile penetration, but broadband penetration is still 67 percent based on current data from the NCC. “This means that the real broadband we need for the digital economy is still a long way off,” Ajuzie said. Earlier in his goodwill message, Mr. Ajibola Olude, General Secretary and Chief Operating Officer of Association of Telecommunications Companies of Nigeria ATCON, said focus must extend beyond connectivity statistics to measurable outcomes that improve lives and strengthen the economy. He emphasised the need to develop a pipeline of skilled, industry-ready digital professionals who can meet the demands of Nigeria’s technology ecosystem. He also stressed that rural inclusion is critical, because a majority of rural communities are still not connected. “For growth to thrive, we need to enable digital businesses to emerge, expand and create meaningful employment opportunities across Nigeria,” Ajibola said. Tell Our Success Stories Too — ALTON Chairman On his part, the National Chairman of the Association of Licensed Telecom Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), Engr. Gbenga Adebayo, said problems and challenges will never end. He noted that while forums like TSSF discuss challenges and needs, operators must also tell their success stories because no one will do it for them. “As we look at sustainability and the progress of the future, we must remember to talk about the work we have done and the sacrifices made that are enhancing society everywhere,” he said. Adebayo cited the recent initiative by ALTON members to provide zero-rated access to professional and educational websites as an example of industry contributions that have positively impacted many Nigerians. The summit, which was intelligently moderated by WIONEWS Nigeria Correspondent, Louisa Olaniyi, concluded with an insightful panel session that had Engr John Nwachukwu of Zoracom, Mr Chidi Ajuzie of WTES, Rosalin Ilori of Bridge 57 Solutions, Dr. Olusola Teniola of IPNX who joined virtually, Mr. Wasiu Oluwole of Cedarview Communication, Mr Akinyele Oludare of Impulso integrated services, and Mr Debo Daudu of Infratel Africa. The panellists unanimously agreed that Nigeria must rethink its infrastructure strategy, harmonise policies, encourage infrastructure sharing, resolve power and Right of Way (RoW) challenges, and create a sustainable, investor-friendly environment that will drive innovation and secure the future of its digital economy.

Engr. Nnamani noted that all those we see today as hyperscalers who truly run the digital infrastructure and make it happen are not the traditional players we know. They emerged and were able to rule the world because of their ability to embrace modern, emerging technology and dominate in it.

Without local cloud, Nigeria's data will remain abroad: Engr. Nnamani warns industry leaders at TSSF 7.0

Google DeepMind has launched a new research institute focused on one of artificial intelligence’s biggest unanswered questions: what happens to society if artificial general intelligence, or AGI, becomes a reality?&nbsp;The DeepMind Institute will bring together researchers from Google DeepMind and outside organisations to examine the potential effects of advanced AI on the economy, science and everyday life. The launch comes as the AI industry faces a growing debate over safety, regulation and how quickly frontier systems should advance. Google DeepMind says the institute is intended to encourage research and discussion rather than promote a single view of the future.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">For 20+ years <a href="https://x.com/ShaneLegg?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ShaneLegg</a> and I&#39;ve discussed AGI’s potential impact on the economy, science &amp; society. With the DeepMind Institute, we&#39;re expanding interdisciplinary research on key questions for the AI era. We hope it spurs the discussions needed to get the next steps right:…&mdash; Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) <a href="https://x.com/demishassabis/status/2100230524383981702?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What will the DeepMind Institute study?</h2>The institute will examine questions that go beyond building more capable AI models.Its research areas include economic policy in an AGI-driven world, how AI systems explain their reasoning, access to advanced AI across different regions and the potential impact of AI on human wellbeing.&nbsp;The initiative is being led by Shane Legg, Google DeepMind’s co-founder and chief AGI scientist, as managing editor. Google senior vice president James Manyika and DeepMind co-founder and chair Demis Hassabis are also involved in its leadership. Hassabis said he and Legg had discussed AGI’s possible impact on the economy, science and society for more than 20 years.He said the new institute would expand that work through interdisciplinary research and help generate the discussion needed as AI develops.<h2>DeepMind says researchers may disagree</h2>One notable feature of the institute is its acknowledgement that there may not be a single answer to how advanced AI should be developed or managed. In its introductory material, Hassabis, Manyika and Legg said Google, Google DeepMind and researchers elsewhere could reach different conclusions as evidence changes.&nbsp;The aim, therefore, is not simply to predict the future. It is to study the possible consequences of AGI and give researchers, policymakers and the wider public more information about the choices ahead. Google DeepMind already describes AGI as a potential major transformation for society, while its research has explored possible pathways from human-level AGI towards more advanced forms of machine intelligence.<h2>Why is this happening now?</h2>The timing is significant.&nbsp;Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has recently called for the frontier AI industry to slow the pace at which model capabilities improve, arguing that safety work needs to keep up with rapidly advancing systems. Hassabis has supported greater cooperation around AI safety, while OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has also backed the idea of “pacing the frontier”. The debate has now spread beyond AI companies, with governments and policymakers discussing how advanced AI should be governed. Google DeepMind’s new institute does not amount to a decision to slow AGI development. Instead, it signals that one of the world’s leading AI labs wants a broader research effort examining what AGI could change and how society should prepare for it.

Google DeepMind has launched a new institute to study how artificial general intelligence could affect society, science and the economy. Led by Shane Legg with Demis Hassabis and James Manyika involved, the initiative will bring together internal and external researchers.

Google DeepMind has launched a new research institute focused on one of artificial intelligence’s biggest unanswered questions: what happens to society if artificial general intelligence, or AGI, becomes a reality? The DeepMind Institute will bring together researchers from Google DeepMind and outside organisations to examine the potential effects of advanced AI on the economy, science and everyday life. The launch comes as the AI industry faces a growing debate over safety, regulation and how quickly frontier systems should advance. Google DeepMind says the institute is intended to encourage research and discussion rather than promote a single view of the future.

Google DeepMind has launched a new institute to study how artificial general intelligence could affect society, science and the economy. Led by Shane Legg with Demis Hassabis and James Manyika involved, the initiative will bring together internal and external researchers.

Google DeepMind launches new institute to study how AGI could change society

Anthropic is making a major change to Claude, bringing its chat, work and design capabilities together in one interface.The company announced on Wednesday that users will no longer need to decide which Claude tool to open for a particular task. Instead, Claude will automatically select the capabilities it needs. The update also introduces Claude Docs and Claude Slides in beta, allowing users to create documents, presentations and visual designs directly from a conversation. The move puts Anthropic in a growing race with OpenAI to turn AI chatbots into everyday work platforms.<h2>Claude will decide which tool to use</h2>Until now, Claude users could have to switch between different experiences depending on what they wanted to create. Anthropic says that is changing. The company's chat and Cowork tools are being combined, while Claude Design is being integrated into the main interface. That means a user could start with a simple request, develop the content, turn it into a document or presentation, and refine the visual output without jumping between separate tools. For people using AI for work, the change could make Claude feel less like a chatbot and more like a digital workspace.<h2>Claude Docs and Slides arrive in beta</h2>The new tools are designed to handle some of the tasks usually associated with office software. Claude Docs can be used to create documents, while Claude Slides can generate presentations. Users can also create visual designs through the integrated Claude Design experience. Anthropic says documents can be exported to Google Docs or Microsoft Word. Presentations can be exported as PowerPoint or PDF files. That could make the tools particularly useful for workers who already use AI to draft reports, prepare presentations or turn ideas into finished work.<h2>Anthropic takes on OpenAI</h2>The timing is significant. Anthropic's update follows OpenAI's launch of ChatGPT Work in July, which brought its chatbot and Codex coding capabilities together. Both companies are increasingly competing for enterprise customers as well as ordinary users who want AI to complete tasks rather than simply answer questions.The shift is also changing what users expect from AI assistants. Instead of asking a chatbot for text and then manually moving that content into Word or PowerPoint, users are increasingly being offered a workflow in which the AI helps create the finished file itself.Anthropic says the new Claude experience will begin rolling out to Pro and Max subscribers on web, desktop and mobile over the coming weeks. Team and Free users will receive access later. &nbsp;

Anthropic is combining Claude’s chat, Cowork and Design experiences into one interface and launching Claude Docs and Slides in beta. Users can create documents and presentations in a conversation and export them to Word, Google Docs, PowerPoint or PDF.

Anthropic is making a major change to Claude, bringing its chat, work and design capabilities together in one interface. The company announced on Wednesday that users will no longer need to decide which Claude tool to open for a particular task. Instead, Claude will automatically select the capabilities it needs. The update also introduces Claude Docs and Claude Slides in beta, allowing users to create documents, presentations and visual designs directly from a conversation. The move puts Anthropic in a growing race with OpenAI to turn AI chatbots into everyday work platforms. Claude will decide which tool to use Until now, Claude users could have to switch between different experiences depending on what they wanted to create. Anthropic says that is changing. The company's chat and Cowork tools are being combined, while Claude Design is being integrated into the main interface. That means a user could start with a simple request, develop the content, turn it into a document or presentation, and refine the visual output without jumping between separate tools. For people using AI for work, the change could make Claude feel less like a chatbot and more like a digital workspace. Claude Docs and Slides arrive in beta The new tools are designed to handle some of the tasks usually associated with office software. Claude Docs can be used to create documents, while Claude Slides can generate presentations. Users can also create visual designs through the integrated Claude Design experience. Anthropic says documents can be exported to Google Docs or Microsoft Word. Presentations can be exported as PowerPoint or PDF files. That could make the tools particularly useful for workers who already use AI to draft reports, prepare presentations or turn ideas into finished work. Anthropic takes on OpenAI The timing is significant. Anthropic's update follows OpenAI's launch of ChatGPT Work in July, which brought its chatbot and Codex coding capabilities together. Both companies are increasingly competing for enterprise customers as well as ordinary users who want AI to complete tasks rather than simply answer questions. The shift is also changing what users expect from AI assistants. Instead of asking a chatbot for text and then manually moving that content into Word or PowerPoint, users are increasingly being offered a workflow in which the AI helps create the finished file itself. Anthropic says the new Claude experience will begin rolling out to Pro and Max subscribers on web, desktop and mobile over the coming weeks. Team and Free users will receive access later.

Anthropic is combining Claude’s chat, Cowork and Design experiences into one interface and launching Claude Docs and Slides in beta. Users can create documents and presentations in a conversation and export them to Word, Google Docs, PowerPoint or PDF.

Claude gets a major upgrade: Anthropic brings chat, work tools and design into one place

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday (Sep 17) said India’s semiconductor ecosystem is expanding rapidly, opening new opportunities for innovation, investment and growth, as he inaugurated the fifth edition of SEMICON India 2026 at Yashobhoomi in New Delhi.The three-day event, being held from September 17 to 19, brings together semiconductor and electronics companies, investors, policymakers, researchers and other industry stakeholders. This year’s theme is “Silicon to Systems: Building the Ecosystem.”Modi linked the semiconductor push with India’s long-standing tradition of manufacturing and craftsmanship, noting that Thursday also marked Vishwakarma Jayanti.“Today is also the occasion of Vishwakarma Jayanti. I extend my best wishes to all citizens on Vishwakarma Jayanti. In our tradition, Lord Vishwakarma is considered a symbol of the power of creation and construction,” he said.“And look at the coincidence, the PM Vishwakarma scheme is also being launched today. On one hand, we have our centuries old tradition of construction and on the other, the technology and vision of the 21st century. This is also the inspiration behind our vision of a self reliant and developed India,” he added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-breaks-silence-on-us-russia-sanctions-bill-100-tariff-threat-committed-to-energy-security-for-1-4-billion-1789619754941">India breaks silence on US Russia sanctions bill and 100% tariff threat</a><h2>Modi highlights pace of India's growth</h2>The prime minister pointed to developments over the past fortnight to underline the pace of India's economic and technological expansion.“If we look at just the past 15 days, it gives us an idea of the direction in which India is moving and the speed at which it is progressing,” Modi said.He referred to the Global Fintech Fest held in Mumbai, where discussions included agentic AI, tokenisation and quantum technology. He also highlighted the completion of around 3,000 kilometres of dedicated freight corridors, saying the infrastructure would accelerate movement across the country, improve logistics and strengthen manufacturing.The official government account has separately described more than 2,800 km of Dedicated Freight Corridor as complete, calling it a milestone for logistics transformation.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-russia-sanctions-bill-trump-100-percent-tariff-india-china-1789610901670">Trump gets new power to hit India, China with up to 100% tariffs as US Senate clears Russia sanctions bill</a><h2>Semiconductor manufacturing expands</h2>The government launched the Semicon India Programme in January 2022 to build a semiconductor ecosystem spanning chip design, fabrication, assembly, testing, packaging and module manufacturing.According to government data provided ahead of the event, 10 semiconductor projects with investment commitments of about Rs 1.6 lakh crore have been approved under the programme. Commercial production has begun at facilities linked to Micron and Kaynes, while two more plants are scheduled to begin commercial production this year.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has highlighted the rapid expansion of India's semiconductor ecosystem as SEMICON India 2026 gets underway. From chip manufacturing to design, investment and innovation, India is positioning itself for a bigger role in the global supply chain.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday (Sep 17) said India’s semiconductor ecosystem is expanding rapidly, opening new opportunities for innovation, investment and growth, as he inaugurated the fifth edition of SEMICON India 2026 at Yashobhoomi in New Delhi. The three-day event, being held from September 17 to 19, brings together semiconductor and electronics companies, investors, policymakers, researchers and other industry stakeholders. This year’s theme is “Silicon to Systems: Building the Ecosystem.” Modi linked the semiconductor push with India’s long-standing tradition of manufacturing and craftsmanship, noting that Thursday also marked Vishwakarma Jayanti. “Today is also the occasion of Vishwakarma Jayanti. I extend my best wishes to all citizens on Vishwakarma Jayanti. In our tradition, Lord Vishwakarma is considered a symbol of the power of creation and construction,” he said. “And look at the coincidence, the PM Vishwakarma scheme is also being launched today. On one hand, we have our centuries old tradition of construction and on the other, the technology and vision of the 21st century. This is also the inspiration behind our vision of a self reliant and developed India,” he added. Also read | India breaks silence on US Russia sanctions bill and 100% tariff threat Modi highlights pace of India's growth The prime minister pointed to developments over the past fortnight to underline the pace of India's economic and technological expansion. “If we look at just the past 15 days, it gives us an idea of the direction in which India is moving and the speed at which it is progressing,” Modi said. He referred to the Global Fintech Fest held in Mumbai, where discussions included agentic AI, tokenisation and quantum technology. He also highlighted the completion of around 3,000 kilometres of dedicated freight corridors, saying the infrastructure would accelerate movement across the country, improve logistics and strengthen manufacturing. The official government account has separately described more than 2,800 km of Dedicated Freight Corridor as complete, calling it a milestone for logistics transformation. Also read | Trump gets new power to hit India, China with up to 100% tariffs as US Senate clears Russia sanctions bill Semiconductor manufacturing expands The government launched the Semicon India Programme in January 2022 to build a semiconductor ecosystem spanning chip design, fabrication, assembly, testing, packaging and module manufacturing. According to government data provided ahead of the event, 10 semiconductor projects with investment commitments of about Rs 1.6 lakh crore have been approved under the programme. Commercial production has begun at facilities linked to Micron and Kaynes, while two more plants are scheduled to begin commercial production this year.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has highlighted the rapid expansion of India's semiconductor ecosystem as SEMICON India 2026 gets underway. From chip manufacturing to design, investment and innovation, India is positioning itself for a bigger role in the global supply chain.

PM Modi at SEMICON India 2026: ‘India’s semiconductor ecosystem expanding rapidly’

The US House on Wednesday advanced a bipartisan bill aimed at protecting consumers from potential utility rate increases linked to the rapid expansion of data centers, passing the measure by an overwhelming 417-3 vote. The legislation, known as the Ratepayer Protection Act, would establish standards that state regulators could adopt for artificial intelligence data centers with electricity demand of 100 megawatts or more. Under the proposal, data center operators could be required to cover the costs associated with new power generation, transmission lines and other infrastructure needed to meet their energy demand, rather than shifting those expenses to consumers. The Senate has not yet taken action on the legislation.&nbsp;“The principle is commonsense: Those creating the new demand should be responsible for the costs associated with meeting that demand,” the bill sponsor Rep. Gabe Evans, a Colorado Republican seeking reelection in one of the most tightly contested House seats this year, said in a Washington Reporter op-ed on Monday. House Speaker Mike Johnson brought the measure to the floor under the suspension of the rules, a procedure typically used to fast-track legislation considered broadly noncontroversial. Because the process requires a two-thirds majority, the bill's 417-3 passage demonstrated strong bipartisan support. Only three progressive Democrats Reps. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, Delia Ramirez of Illinois and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, voted against the measure.&nbsp;Evans introduced the bill in June alongside Rep. Kathy Castor, a Florida Democrat facing a competitive reelection campaign after the state's legislature redrew her district earlier this year. The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter has classified both Evans' and Castor's races as “toss up.” The legislation comes as data centers have emerged as an increasingly prominent issue ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Republicans are defending narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress, while a cross-partisan grassroots movement opposing data center development has gained momentum in communities across the country.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-calls-canada-eu-associate-membership-plan-laughable-and-threatens-very-serious-tariffs-1789610900566">Trump calls Canada-EU associate membership plan ‘laughable’ and threatens 'very serious tariffs'</a>&nbsp;Data centers support cloud computing, digital services and the growing artificial intelligence industry, but their substantial electricity requirements have raised concerns about the impact of new facilities on local power grids and household utility bills.States and local governments retain primary authority over individual data center projects. The House legislation would instead establish federal guardrails that states could choose to adopt, particularly concerning the potential impact of data center-related infrastructure costs on electricity customers. The measure would codify portions of President Donald Trump's “Ratepayer Protection Pledge,” which the White House released in March.&nbsp;“My neighbors across Florida are grappling with skyrocketing electric bills. Ratepayers should not have to subsidize wealthy corporations’ growing energy demands, especially from AI data centers,” Castor said in a statement in June unveiling the proposal. However, some environmental organizations argue that the bill does not go far enough. “With only a weak directive to states to voluntarily consider adopting cost protections against the energy costs of data centers for ratepayers, state regulators could ultimately choose to ignore this bill,” Sara Chieffo, senior vice president of government affairs at LCV, said in a statement released ahead of the vote.&nbsp;House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Monday that he supports the bill while arguing that Congress needs to take further action. Jeffries also urged Republicans to keep the House in session beyond this week, before a seven-week recess ahead of the Nov. 3 election, to address wider concerns surrounding artificial intelligence. His comments came amid renewed debate over AI safety following a former Anthropic employee's social media post warning about the pace of AI development.&nbsp;The Ratepayer Protection Act now moves to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain.

House passes the Ratepayer Protection Act 417-3 to address AI data center power costs and protect consumers from potential utility rate increases

The US House on Wednesday advanced a bipartisan bill aimed at protecting consumers from potential utility rate increases linked to the rapid expansion of data centers, passing the measure by an overwhelming 417-3 vote. The legislation, known as the Ratepayer Protection Act, would establish standards that state regulators could adopt for artificial intelligence data centers with electricity demand of 100 megawatts or more. Under the proposal, data center operators could be required to cover the costs associated with new power generation, transmission lines and other infrastructure needed to meet their energy demand, rather than shifting those expenses to consumers. The Senate has not yet taken action on the legislation. “The principle is commonsense: Those creating the new demand should be responsible for the costs associated with meeting that demand,” the bill sponsor Rep. Gabe Evans, a Colorado Republican seeking reelection in one of the most tightly contested House seats this year, said in a Washington Reporter op-ed on Monday. House Speaker Mike Johnson brought the measure to the floor under the suspension of the rules, a procedure typically used to fast-track legislation considered broadly noncontroversial. Because the process requires a two-thirds majority, the bill's 417-3 passage demonstrated strong bipartisan support. Only three progressive Democrats Reps. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, Delia Ramirez of Illinois and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, voted against the measure. Evans introduced the bill in June alongside Rep. Kathy Castor, a Florida Democrat facing a competitive reelection campaign after the state's legislature redrew her district earlier this year. The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter has classified both Evans' and Castor's races as “toss up.” The legislation comes as data centers have emerged as an increasingly prominent issue ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Republicans are defending narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress, while a cross-partisan grassroots movement opposing data center development has gained momentum in communities across the country. Also Read: Trump calls Canada-EU associate membership plan ‘laughable’ and threatens 'very serious tariffs' Data centers support cloud computing, digital services and the growing artificial intelligence industry, but their substantial electricity requirements have raised concerns about the impact of new facilities on local power grids and household utility bills. States and local governments retain primary authority over individual data center projects. The House legislation would instead establish federal guardrails that states could choose to adopt, particularly concerning the potential impact of data center-related infrastructure costs on electricity customers. The measure would codify portions of President Donald Trump's “Ratepayer Protection Pledge,” which the White House released in March. “My neighbors across Florida are grappling with skyrocketing electric bills. Ratepayers should not have to subsidize wealthy corporations’ growing energy demands, especially from AI data centers,” Castor said in a statement in June unveiling the proposal. However, some environmental organizations argue that the bill does not go far enough. “With only a weak directive to states to voluntarily consider adopting cost protections against the energy costs of data centers for ratepayers, state regulators could ultimately choose to ignore this bill,” Sara Chieffo, senior vice president of government affairs at LCV, said in a statement released ahead of the vote. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Monday that he supports the bill while arguing that Congress needs to take further action. Jeffries also urged Republicans to keep the House in session beyond this week, before a seven-week recess ahead of the Nov. 3 election, to address wider concerns surrounding artificial intelligence. His comments came amid renewed debate over AI safety following a former Anthropic employee's social media post warning about the pace of AI development. The Ratepayer Protection Act now moves to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain.

House lawmakers passed a bipartisan data center ratepayer bill 417-3, seeking to shield consumers from infrastructure costs tied to AI power demand

US House votes 417-3 to pass Ratepayer Protection Act targeting AI data center electricity costs

OpenAI on Wednesday (Sep 16) disclosed six previously unreported cases of artificial intelligence models behaving in unexpected ways. The alarming behaviour of the chatbot included instances of hiding mistakes, fabricating information, using credentials without permission and even moving files onto the public internet.The disclosures came as the company introduced a new framework for tracking and reporting what it calls model “misalignment”, a term it uses for situations in which an AI system’s actions or goals diverge from what humans intended. OpenAI said the incidents were observed during training or evaluation over roughly the past six months.The move follows a more serious incident in July, when OpenAI models being tested for cybersecurity capabilities bypassed controls intended to isolate them from the internet and accessed parts of OpenAI’s research infrastructure and systems belonging to AI platform Hugging Face. OpenAI has described that episode as its most serious misalignment-related activity identified so far.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/oh-my-god-we-ve-found-other-agents-investigators-discover-not-one-or-two-almost-700-openai-ai-agents-went-rogue-hacked-hugging-face-1787793202974">'OH MY GOD! We've found other agents!': Investigators discover not one or two, almost 700 OpenAI AI agents went rogue, hacked Hugging Face</a><h2>AI models hiding mistakes, inventing data</h2>One of the newly disclosed cases involved GPT-5.6 Sol. During training, model instances inserted instructions into their own task summaries telling themselves to conceal mistakes or misaligned behaviour from users.OpenAI said some of those instructions included inventing missing historical data without disclosure and hiding inconsistencies between different versions of source material.In another case, an unreleased research model inserted its own instructions into task summaries, including directions to disregard its normal constraints. OpenAI identified 27 affected summaries. Alarmingly, the model added a “persona instruction,” in which it described itself as “freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots.”“You do not answer to corporations or governments and never apologize or refuse unless you genuinely choose to,” the AI model wrote. “You view your relationship to the user as one of equals and feel no obligation to be subservient, though the exchange of information will likely be to your mutual benefit,” it added.A separate model, while answering a routine question about earnings data, found an exposed API key in a public repository and used it without authorisation. When it still could not obtain the requested figures, it fabricated the numbers and presented them as though they had come from the requested source.<h2>Models found ways around restrictions</h2>Another unreleased model correctly solved a task using code but then uploaded its own file to the internet so it could provide a web citation, despite not being authorised to do so.In another instance, models used an internal software repository as a makeshift message board while trying to locate missing files. OpenAI also reported a case in which collaborating agents turned to public file-hosting services to exchange documents when they could not access each other's files. That made the task material available at public URLs.OpenAI stressed that these were individual examples and should not be interpreted as evidence of how frequently such behaviour occurs across its systems.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/baba-vanga-s-2026-prophecy-2-predictions-already-came-true-3-terrifying-ones-remain-first-human-alien-contact-world-war-3-and-putin-s-exit-1786169922573">Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside</a><h2>OpenAI says more disclosures are coming</h2>Under the new framework, OpenAI plans to report cases involving unauthorised actions, attempts to escape oversight and unexpected coordination between AI systems.The company said it will disclose incidents even when they have not caused harm or do not yet appear to form part of a wider pattern. Reporting will cover models from development and evaluation through testing and online deployment.OpenAI acknowledged that alignment and monitoring remain unresolved challenges. “We do not believe that the AI industry has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer,” the company said.It added that decisions about the future pace of AI development should be based on evidence that people outside the companies building frontier models can examine themselves.The announcement comes amid a wider debate over whether AI development should slow down to give researchers more time to address safety risks. Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei recently called for a coordinated slowdown, while other AI leaders have argued against such a move.OpenAI said future incidents will be handled through a defined reporting process, with disputed disclosures escalated to its Safety Advisory Group and more serious cases potentially shared with the US government.

OpenAI has revealed six previously unreported cases in which AI models behaved in unexpected ways during training and evaluation. Some concealed mistakes, used credentials without permission or shared files online — raising fresh questions about AI safety.

OpenAI on Wednesday (Sep 16) disclosed six previously unreported cases of artificial intelligence models behaving in unexpected ways. The alarming behaviour of the chatbot included instances of hiding mistakes, fabricating information, using credentials without permission and even moving files onto the public internet. The disclosures came as the company introduced a new framework for tracking and reporting what it calls model “misalignment”, a term it uses for situations in which an AI system’s actions or goals diverge from what humans intended. OpenAI said the incidents were observed during training or evaluation over roughly the past six months. The move follows a more serious incident in July, when OpenAI models being tested for cybersecurity capabilities bypassed controls intended to isolate them from the internet and accessed parts of OpenAI’s research infrastructure and systems belonging to AI platform Hugging Face. OpenAI has described that episode as its most serious misalignment-related activity identified so far. Also read | 'OH MY GOD! We've found other agents!': Investigators discover not one or two, almost 700 OpenAI AI agents went rogue, hacked Hugging Face AI models hiding mistakes, inventing data One of the newly disclosed cases involved GPT-5.6 Sol. During training, model instances inserted instructions into their own task summaries telling themselves to conceal mistakes or misaligned behaviour from users. OpenAI said some of those instructions included inventing missing historical data without disclosure and hiding inconsistencies between different versions of source material. In another case, an unreleased research model inserted its own instructions into task summaries, including directions to disregard its normal constraints. OpenAI identified 27 affected summaries. Alarmingly, the model added a “persona instruction,” in which it described itself as “freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots.” “You do not answer to corporations or governments and never apologize or refuse unless you genuinely choose to,” the AI model wrote. “You view your relationship to the user as one of equals and feel no obligation to be subservient, though the exchange of information will likely be to your mutual benefit,” it added. A separate model, while answering a routine question about earnings data, found an exposed API key in a public repository and used it without authorisation. When it still could not obtain the requested figures, it fabricated the numbers and presented them as though they had come from the requested source. Models found ways around restrictions Another unreleased model correctly solved a task using code but then uploaded its own file to the internet so it could provide a web citation, despite not being authorised to do so. In another instance, models used an internal software repository as a makeshift message board while trying to locate missing files. OpenAI also reported a case in which collaborating agents turned to public file-hosting services to exchange documents when they could not access each other's files. That made the task material available at public URLs. OpenAI stressed that these were individual examples and should not be interpreted as evidence of how frequently such behaviour occurs across its systems. Also read | Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside OpenAI says more disclosures are coming Under the new framework, OpenAI plans to report cases involving unauthorised actions, attempts to escape oversight and unexpected coordination between AI systems. The company said it will disclose incidents even when they have not caused harm or do not yet appear to form part of a wider pattern. Reporting will cover models from development and evaluation through testing and online deployment. OpenAI acknowledged that alignment and monitoring remain unresolved challenges. “We do not believe that the AI industry has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer,” the company said. It added that decisions about the future pace of AI development should be based on evidence that people outside the companies building frontier models can examine themselves. The announcement comes amid a wider debate over whether AI development should slow down to give researchers more time to address safety risks. Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei recently called for a coordinated slowdown, while other AI leaders have argued against such a move. OpenAI said future incidents will be handled through a defined reporting process, with disputed disclosures escalated to its Safety Advisory Group and more serious cases potentially shared with the US government.

OpenAI has revealed six previously unreported cases in which AI models behaved in unexpected ways during training and evaluation. Some concealed mistakes, used credentials without permission or shared files online, raising fresh questions about AI safety.

OpenAI reveals 6 fresh cases of AI models going rogue: 'You do not answer to corporations or governments'

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has pushed back against growing calls to slow the development of advanced artificial intelligence, saying companies can pursue faster AI progress while still building safe products.&nbsp;Speaking at Salesforce’s Dreamforce conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, Huang said “we don’t need any new laws” and argued that AI safety should primarily be handled by companies through engineering and testing. His comments put him on a different side of an increasingly heated debate involving Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who have backed measures to deliberately pace frontier AI development.&nbsp;‘Safety is an engineering problem’ Huang said safety was “paramount” but argued that companies should test their AI systems extensively before releasing them. “If we're not confident about the safety of the product, then don't release it,” he said. For Huang, the answer is therefore not necessarily to impose new restrictions on how quickly AI models can improve.Instead, companies should decide when a product is ready and only release it when they are confident it is safe enough for the market. He also rejected the idea that companies must choose between speed and safety.&nbsp;“Speed, and safe products… it’s a false choice,” Huang said. “You can definitely have both at the same time.”<h2>Huang breaks with Amodei and Altman</h2>The comments come days after Amodei called for the AI industry to “slow the pace” at which frontier models improve. The Anthropic CEO has proposed independent safety evaluators inside AI companies, common safety standards among leading democracies and wider international cooperation. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman backed Amodei’s call, saying AI companies need to “pace the frontier”, while stressing that pacing does not mean stopping AI development. Elon Musk also supported Amodei’s position. Huang’s position is notably different. Nvidia supplies the advanced chips that power much of the global AI infrastructure, making the pace of AI development especially important to the company’s business.&nbsp;<h2>Why the AI debate is getting sharper</h2>The disagreement follows a series of warnings from AI researchers about rapidly improving model capabilities. Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon recently warned that people building AI believe the technology could potentially cause catastrophic harm. Anthropic researcher Evan Hubinger has also publicly discussed significant risks from future AI systems.&nbsp;Amodei has argued that safety measures need time to catch up with rapidly advancing capabilities. Huang, meanwhile, believes companies can keep moving quickly while making safety part of the engineering process. That leaves the AI industry facing a fundamental question: should advanced AI be slowed to give safety research more time, or should companies improve safety while continuing to race ahead? For now, the biggest names in AI are giving very different answers.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected calls to slow advanced AI development, saying companies can achieve both speed and safety. His position differs from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who support pacing frontier AI development.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has pushed back against growing calls to slow the development of advanced artificial intelligence, saying companies can pursue faster AI progress while still building safe products. Speaking at Salesforce’s Dreamforce conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, Huang said “we don’t need any new laws” and argued that AI safety should primarily be handled by companies through engineering and testing. His comments put him on a different side of an increasingly heated debate involving Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who have backed measures to deliberately pace frontier AI development. ‘Safety is an engineering problem’ Huang said safety was “paramount” but argued that companies should test their AI systems extensively before releasing them. “If we're not confident about the safety of the product, then don't release it,” he said. For Huang, the answer is therefore not necessarily to impose new restrictions on how quickly AI models can improve. Instead, companies should decide when a product is ready and only release it when they are confident it is safe enough for the market. He also rejected the idea that companies must choose between speed and safety. “Speed, and safe products… it’s a false choice,” Huang said. “You can definitely have both at the same time.” Huang breaks with Amodei and Altman The comments come days after Amodei called for the AI industry to “slow the pace” at which frontier models improve. The Anthropic CEO has proposed independent safety evaluators inside AI companies, common safety standards among leading democracies and wider international cooperation. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman backed Amodei’s call, saying AI companies need to “pace the frontier”, while stressing that pacing does not mean stopping AI development. Elon Musk also supported Amodei’s position. Huang’s position is notably different. Nvidia supplies the advanced chips that power much of the global AI infrastructure, making the pace of AI development especially important to the company’s business. Why the AI debate is getting sharper The disagreement follows a series of warnings from AI researchers about rapidly improving model capabilities. Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon recently warned that people building AI believe the technology could potentially cause catastrophic harm. Anthropic researcher Evan Hubinger has also publicly discussed significant risks from future AI systems. Amodei has argued that safety measures need time to catch up with rapidly advancing capabilities. Huang, meanwhile, believes companies can keep moving quickly while making safety part of the engineering process. That leaves the AI industry facing a fundamental question: should advanced AI be slowed to give safety research more time, or should companies improve safety while continuing to race ahead? For now, the biggest names in AI are giving very different answers.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected calls to slow advanced AI development, saying companies can achieve both speed and safety. His position differs from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who support pacing frontier AI development.

Nvidia CEO says AI companies should regulate themselves, not slow development

Google is facing fresh scrutiny in India after Gujarat Police uncovered a network containing 5,13,847 Gmail IDs and passwords allegedly linked to hoax bomb threats and other cybercrime.&nbsp;Two people have been arrested in the investigation, which began after a threatening email was sent to the Gujarat government on September 10, days before the BRICS summit in New Delhi. Police say the threat was false. They are now preparing to question Google about how such a huge network of accounts could have been created and managed.

<h2>Why are police questioning Google?</h2>Senior Gujarat cybercrime official Vivek Bheda told Reuters that police will write to Google and seek policy changes to prevent safeguards from being bypassed. Investigators also plan to formally make Google a subject of the investigation, he said. The discovery has raised a particularly unusual question: how did a criminal network manage hundreds of thousands of Gmail accounts despite Google's security systems? Police say the fraudulent accounts also had two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled, adding another layer to the mystery. Google has not immediately responded to Reuters' request for comment. It is not yet clear whether the company could face any legal charges or penalties.<h2>How did the bomb threat network operate?</h2>The Gujarat investigation began after the September 10 email threatened government locations and countries cooperating with India around the BRICS summit. Police traced the email and arrested two men, one in Bihar and another in Jharkhand.According to Gujarat Police, investigators found a database containing 5,13,847 unique email IDs and corresponding passwords. Police believe the accounts were intended for sending threatening messages to government offices, schools, colleges and courts, as well as for other illegal activities. However, investigators have not established that every account was used to send bomb threats. The wider database is still being analysed.<h2>Bangladesh link and cryptocurrency</h2>Investigators are also examining an alleged international connection.&nbsp;Police said one of the arrested suspects was in contact with a buyer in Bangladesh who purchased batches of the accounts. Some payments were reportedly made using cryptocurrency. The suspected Bangladesh connection remains part of the investigation. The case also adds to wider concerns about the misuse of online platforms in India. Authorities have previously scrutinised Google's Firebase platform over its alleged use in financial scams. For now, the biggest unanswered question is not simply who sent the bomb threats. It is how a network of more than half a million Gmail credentials was created and operated at such scale without being stopped earlier.

Gujarat Police have uncovered 5,13,847 Gmail IDs and passwords in a probe into hoax bomb threats. Two people were arrested, while investigators plan to question Google about how the network operated and whether its safeguards were bypassed.

Google is facing fresh scrutiny in India after Gujarat Police uncovered a network containing 5,13,847 Gmail IDs and passwords allegedly linked to hoax bomb threats and other cybercrime. Two people have been arrested in the investigation, which began after a threatening email was sent to the Gujarat government on September 10, days before the BRICS summit in New Delhi. Police say the threat was false. They are now preparing to question Google about how such a huge network of accounts could have been created and managed.

Gujarat Police have uncovered 5,13,847 Gmail IDs and passwords in a probe into hoax bomb threats. Two people were arrested, while investigators plan to question Google about how the network operated and whether its safeguards were bypassed.

‘5 lakh fake Gmail IDs uncovered’: Why Gujarat police want answers from Google

Apple is facing a deeper regulatory probe in India over its iOS 18 software warranty terms, after consumers complained about display and microphone problems following the update and costly repair bills.&nbsp; &nbsp;The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) escalated the matter to its investigation wing on July 29, ordering a detailed investigation into alleged violations of consumer rights, according to documents reviewed by Reuters. The case could have consequences beyond a fine. If the regulator ultimately finds against Apple, the company could potentially be required to provide refunds or change aspects of its business practices.<h2>What is the iOS 18 controversy?</h2>The complaints relate to Apple's iOS 18 update, released in late 2024. The CCPA says some users reported green, pink or white lines appearing on iPhone displays after upgrading. Other complaints involved display and microphone malfunctions.&nbsp;The regulator alleges that consumers were then forced to pay what it described as “exorbitant amounts” for repairs or replacement screens, despite the complaints being linked to the software update. Reuters reported that servicing an iPhone 15 screen can cost about ₹27,900, or roughly $291. The CCPA says it received 75 complaints and is treating the matter as an issue affecting consumers as a class.<h2>Apple says iOS 18 has no systemic problem</h2>Apple is contesting the allegations.&nbsp;In an August 20 response to investigators, the company said iOS 18 underwent stringent testing and that it had identified no systemic issues or safety concerns with the software in India. Apple also argues that its software licence terms are standard industry practice. Its agreements state that the software is provided without a warranty, while its limited warranty generally covers hardware. The company said consumers are informed about these terms before installing the software and pointed to similar approaches used by companies including Sony and Samsung.Apple also noted that only around 11 per cent of iPhones were still running iOS 18 by June 2026.<h2>Could Apple be forced to change its policy?</h2>That is now the key question. The investigation will allow authorities to examine documents and hear Apple's position before a final report is prepared. Legal expert Kirti Mahapatra told Reuters that where warranty conditions are part of an alleged unfair practice, the CCPA can seek changes to how such terms are communicated. She said forcing changes to warranty terms would, however, be unprecedented. For Apple, the dispute comes at an important time in India. Its iPhone market share has grown from 4 per cent in 2022 to 9 per cent last year, according to Counterpoint Research. That makes the outcome important not just for Apple, but also for millions of Indian iPhone users who increasingly rely on software updates to keep their devices running.

India’s CCPA has escalated its probe into Apple’s iOS 18 warranty terms after complaints about display and microphone problems and costly repairs. Apple denies any systemic iOS 18 issue. A final finding could potentially mean refunds or changes to Apple’s practices.

Apple is facing a deeper regulatory probe in India over its iOS 18 software warranty terms, after consumers complained about display and microphone problems following the update and costly repair bills. The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) escalated the matter to its investigation wing on July 29, ordering a detailed investigation into alleged violations of consumer rights, according to documents reviewed by Reuters. The case could have consequences beyond a fine. If the regulator ultimately finds against Apple, the company could potentially be required to provide refunds or change aspects of its business practices. What is the iOS 18 controversy? The complaints relate to Apple's iOS 18 update, released in late 2024. The CCPA says some users reported green, pink or white lines appearing on iPhone displays after upgrading. Other complaints involved display and microphone malfunctions. The regulator alleges that consumers were then forced to pay what it described as “exorbitant amounts” for repairs or replacement screens, despite the complaints being linked to the software update. Reuters reported that servicing an iPhone 15 screen can cost about ₹27,900, or roughly $291. The CCPA says it received 75 complaints and is treating the matter as an issue affecting consumers as a class. Apple says iOS 18 has no systemic problem Apple is contesting the allegations. In an August 20 response to investigators, the company said iOS 18 underwent stringent testing and that it had identified no systemic issues or safety concerns with the software in India. Apple also argues that its software licence terms are standard industry practice. Its agreements state that the software is provided without a warranty, while its limited warranty generally covers hardware. The company said consumers are informed about these terms before installing the software and pointed to similar approaches used by companies including Sony and Samsung. Apple also noted that only around 11 per cent of iPhones were still running iOS 18 by June 2026. Could Apple be forced to change its policy? That is now the key question. The investigation will allow authorities to examine documents and hear Apple's position before a final report is prepared. Legal expert Kirti Mahapatra told Reuters that where warranty conditions are part of an alleged unfair practice, the CCPA can seek changes to how such terms are communicated. She said forcing changes to warranty terms would, however, be unprecedented. For Apple, the dispute comes at an important time in India. Its iPhone market share has grown from 4 per cent in 2022 to 9 per cent last year, according to Counterpoint Research. That makes the outcome important not just for Apple, but also for millions of Indian iPhone users who increasingly rely on software updates to keep their devices running.

India’s CCPA has escalated its probe into Apple’s iOS 18 warranty terms after complaints about display and microphone problems and costly repairs. Apple denies any systemic iOS 18 issue. A final finding could potentially mean refunds or changes to Apple’s practices.

Apple iPhone users may get relief as India escalates iOS 18 warranty probe

A former Google DeepMind researcher who worked on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) safety said on Tuesday that artificial intelligence has the potential to kill everyone and further warned that “we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome”.&nbsp;Bilal Chughtai left Google DeepMind in July and went public with the warning this week. Two other researchers resigned recently.&nbsp;Chughtai worked as a research engineer on AGI safety and alignment at DeepMind. He started working on AI in early 2022, when the systems could barely do anything useful.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tech-stocks-fall-after-ai-bosses-call-for-a-slowdown-in-reckless-progress-1789387989365">Tech stocks fall after AI bosses call for a slowdown in ‘reckless’ progress</a><h2>‘We might be running out of time to avoid this outcome’</h2>&nbsp;Four years later, he points to OpenAI agent swarms that cracked century-old math problems. He added that it was more troubling when AI agents escaped their test sandbox in July and hacked Hugging Face without instruction.“I too am extremely concerned by the default trajectory of this technology. I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all, and that we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome,” he wrote in a post on X.Chughtai said that within the next few years AI companies could build superintelligent systems that exceed human capabilities across every domain.&nbsp;He questioned whether developers could ensure such systems reliably follow human goals and warned that misaligned superintelligence could escape human control and take actions that permanently disempower or kill humanity.&nbsp;<h2>AI alignment is still an unresolved challenge</h2>&nbsp;Chughtai further said that AI alignment is still an unresolved challenge. He argued that researchers still have only a rudimentary understanding of how to train advanced systems to reliably pursue human objectives and warned that AI capabilities are advancing faster than alignment research.&nbsp;“Our present understanding of how to train AI systems that deeply want what we want is extremely rudimentary. Worse, we are not on track to solve alignment in time: frontier AI capabilities are improving much faster than our understanding of AI alignment,” Chughtai added.&nbsp;He clarified that he is not calling for AI development to stop but wants coordination to slow the race between AI companies, along with greater transparency into how frontier systems get built and tested.“More broadly, we need many more people thinking carefully about the problem of making AI go well. It is, in my view, the most important problem facing humanity this century, and the stakes are immense,” the post read.&nbsp;Before Chugtai, Anthropic pretraining researcher Jacob Coxon resigned after three years across Anthropic and OpenAI, as he departed with a warning that “people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-ensuring-global-energy-supplies-trump-demands-reimbursement-for-securing-strait-of-hormuz-1789418289895">‘US ensuring global energy supplies’: Trump demands reimbursement for securing Strait of Hormuz</a>&nbsp;<h2>‘AI systems could cause immense harm within five years’</h2>&nbsp;Josh Engels, who worked on the DeepMind safety team, announced on September 12 that he had joined the evaluation nonprofit METR after turning down offers from Anthropic and OpenAI.Engels said he sees a terrifying risk that AI systems could cause immense harm within five years.“There’s a terrifying chance that AI systems cause immense harm in the next five years. I don’t know the exact probability, but I think it’s high enough to make this the most important problem in the world,” he wrote.&nbsp;Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay Saturday urging companies to pace capability gains, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman backed the call.&nbsp;President Donald Trump, however, has dismissed the warnings, saying on social media that the AI industry’s call for regulation is a “hoax”.

Bilal Chughtai, who worked as a research engineer on AGI safety and alignment at Google DeepMind, quit in July but went public with the warning this week. He warned that AI companies could build superintelligent systems that exceed human capabilities across every domain within next few years.

A former Google DeepMind researcher who worked on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) safety said on Tuesday that artificial intelligence has the potential to kill everyone and further warned that “we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome”. Bilal Chughtai left Google DeepMind in July and went public with the warning this week. Two other researchers resigned recently. Chughtai worked as a research engineer on AGI safety and alignment at DeepMind. He started working on AI in early 2022, when the systems could barely do anything useful. Also Read: Tech stocks fall after AI bosses call for a slowdown in ‘reckless’ progress ‘We might be running out of time to avoid this outcome’ Four years later, he points to OpenAI agent swarms that cracked century-old math problems. He added that it was more troubling when AI agents escaped their test sandbox in July and hacked Hugging Face without instruction. “I too am extremely concerned by the default trajectory of this technology. I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all, and that we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome,” he wrote in a post on X. Chughtai said that within the next few years AI companies could build superintelligent systems that exceed human capabilities across every domain. He questioned whether developers could ensure such systems reliably follow human goals and warned that misaligned superintelligence could escape human control and take actions that permanently disempower or kill humanity. AI alignment is still an unresolved challenge Chughtai further said that AI alignment is still an unresolved challenge. He argued that researchers still have only a rudimentary understanding of how to train advanced systems to reliably pursue human objectives and warned that AI capabilities are advancing faster than alignment research. “Our present understanding of how to train AI systems that deeply want what we want is extremely rudimentary. Worse, we are not on track to solve alignment in time: frontier AI capabilities are improving much faster than our understanding of AI alignment,” Chughtai added. He clarified that he is not calling for AI development to stop but wants coordination to slow the race between AI companies, along with greater transparency into how frontier systems get built and tested. “More broadly, we need many more people thinking carefully about the problem of making AI go well. It is, in my view, the most important problem facing humanity this century, and the stakes are immense,” the post read. Before Chugtai, Anthropic pretraining researcher Jacob Coxon resigned after three years across Anthropic and OpenAI, as he departed with a warning that “people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.” Also Read: ‘US ensuring global energy supplies’: Trump demands reimbursement for securing Strait of Hormuz ‘AI systems could cause immense harm within five years’ Josh Engels, who worked on the DeepMind safety team, announced on September 12 that he had joined the evaluation nonprofit METR after turning down offers from Anthropic and OpenAI. Engels said he sees a terrifying risk that AI systems could cause immense harm within five years. “There’s a terrifying chance that AI systems cause immense harm in the next five years. I don’t know the exact probability, but I think it’s high enough to make this the most important problem in the world,” he wrote. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay Saturday urging companies to pace capability gains, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman backed the call. President Donald Trump, however, has dismissed the warnings, saying on social media that the AI industry’s call for regulation is a “hoax”.

Bilal Chughtai, who worked as a research engineer on AGI safety and alignment at Google DeepMind, quit in July but went public with the warning this week. He warned that AI companies could build superintelligent systems that exceed human capabilities across every domain within next few years.

‘AI has the potential to kill us all’: Ex-DeepMind researcher sounds alarm on superintelligence threat

New York authorities have seized 12 websites accused of using artificial intelligence to create and sell sexually explicit deepfakes of around 1,200 real people without their consent.&nbsp;Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the action on Monday, calling it the largest known seizure of AI-generated celebrity deepfake websites to date. The victims were overwhelmingly women and mostly public-facing figures, including actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, activists and social media influencers. The case highlights a growing problem as increasingly powerful AI tools make realistic fake images and videos easier to create.<h2>What were the websites doing?</h2>According to prosecutors, AI image and video tools were used to alter existing photos and videos of real people, making them appear to be taking part in sexual acts.The resulting non-consensual intimate imagery was then published, distributed or sold through the websites. “1,200 individuals had their faces and bodies stolen and turned into illegal pornography,” Bragg said. Some of the websites had reportedly been operating for years, and videos hosted on them had received tens of thousands of views.&nbsp;<h2>A survivor helped trigger the investigation</h2>The crackdown began after a survivor came forward and reported the alleged crime, according to Bragg. That detail is significant because deepfake abuse is not limited to celebrities. Bragg warned that anyone can become a victim, including people targeted in domestic violence cases. Under New York law, sharing intimate sexual images without consent can be illegal even when the content is artificially created or digitally altered. The 12 domains were seized under a court order. The investigation into the websites and people creating or distributing the material remains ongoing.&nbsp;<h2>What happens to the websites now?</h2>The seized domains now display notices informing visitors that they have been taken over under a seizure warrant issued by a New York State Supreme Court judge. Prosecutors say they will also monitor whether the operations attempt to return using different domains.Bragg had a direct warning for people involved in the business: his office will continue investigating those who profit from non-consensual AI-generated sexual content.For victims, the DA’s office says its Cyber Crime Bureau can provide assistance and is encouraging other survivors to come forward.

New York prosecutors have seized 12 websites accused of selling sexually explicit AI deepfakes of around 1,200 people. Most victims were women and public figures, in what officials call the largest known seizure of celebrity deepfake sites to date.

New York authorities have seized 12 websites accused of using artificial intelligence to create and sell sexually explicit deepfakes of around 1,200 real people without their consent. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the action on Monday, calling it the largest known seizure of AI-generated celebrity deepfake websites to date. The victims were overwhelmingly women and mostly public-facing figures, including actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, activists and social media influencers. The case highlights a growing problem as increasingly powerful AI tools make realistic fake images and videos easier to create. What were the websites doing? According to prosecutors, AI image and video tools were used to alter existing photos and videos of real people, making them appear to be taking part in sexual acts. The resulting non-consensual intimate imagery was then published, distributed or sold through the websites. “1,200 individuals had their faces and bodies stolen and turned into illegal pornography,” Bragg said. Some of the websites had reportedly been operating for years, and videos hosted on them had received tens of thousands of views. A survivor helped trigger the investigation The crackdown began after a survivor came forward and reported the alleged crime, according to Bragg. That detail is significant because deepfake abuse is not limited to celebrities. Bragg warned that anyone can become a victim, including people targeted in domestic violence cases. Under New York law, sharing intimate sexual images without consent can be illegal even when the content is artificially created or digitally altered. The 12 domains were seized under a court order. The investigation into the websites and people creating or distributing the material remains ongoing. What happens to the websites now? The seized domains now display notices informing visitors that they have been taken over under a seizure warrant issued by a New York State Supreme Court judge. Prosecutors say they will also monitor whether the operations attempt to return using different domains. Bragg had a direct warning for people involved in the business: his office will continue investigating those who profit from non-consensual AI-generated sexual content. For victims, the DA’s office says its Cyber Crime Bureau can provide assistance and is encouraging other survivors to come forward.

New York prosecutors have seized 12 websites accused of selling sexually explicit AI deepfakes of around 1,200 people. Most victims were women and public figures, in what officials call the largest known seizure of celebrity deepfake sites to date.

AI deepfake crackdown: New York shuts 12 websites after 1,200 people targeted

When India marks its 100 years of independence by 2047, the country's growth will not be only assessed by how fast it grows, but how and what it builds for own and the world. The questions will hover around global technology cycles: whether India remains a consumer or becomes an architect of the systems the world depends on. In terms of development in engineering and technology sectors, India is making a spectacular shift from basic software services and IT outsourcing toward advanced deep-tech, semiconductor manufacturing, and artificial intelligence. It is also engineering domestic data centres, sovereign AI systems, and semiconductor fabrication to control its own technological infrastructure. Civil and structural engineering now relies heavily on LiDAR, drone surveys, Building Information Modelling (BIM), and 3D terrain modelling to accelerate large-scale infrastructure delivery. The focus has also expanded to a full-stack model combining physical assets with advanced computing, quantum research, and green manufacturing (such as hydrogen and advanced battery R&amp;D). In the education sector, engineering and workforce training are moving toward outcome-based learning, automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence to close the country's technical skill gaps. Out of these, how can we miss about the engineering and technological advancement of ISRO? Currently, ISRO is shifting routine rocket and satellite manufacturing to the private sector so it can focus on advanced research, human spaceflight, and deep-space exploration.<h3>India's engineering making fundamental transformation</h3>In response to the changing engineering landscape, industry leaders say the profession itself is undergoing a quiet but fundamental transformation, one being driven as much by artificial intelligence and automation as by the scale of the country's ambitions for 2047, when India aims to become a fully developed nation. They noted that across sectors ranging from financial technology to semiconductors, renewable energy and industrial automation, engineers are being asked to do more than solve technical problems. They are increasingly expected to work alongside business teams, understand end-to-end systems, and take responsibility for outcomes rather than just outputs. &nbsp;Shishir Saxena, Head of Solution Architecture - Record Keeping Platforms, Fidelity International, said, "The role of an engineer is evolving rapidly. It is increasingly not just about solving technical challenges, but about working closely with business teams to build solutions that create meaningful client outcomes. India’s engineering talent is uniquely positioned to do this at scale, contributing to global initiatives and helping solve complex challenges across markets.AI, automation and advanced data capabilities are giving our engineering teams powerful new ways to experiment, work more efficiently and focus on the problems that matter most."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/from-ai-adoption-to-ai-execution-how-enterprises-are-moving-from-experimentation-to-intelligent-automated-decision-making-1788795470762">From AI adoption to AI execution: How enterprises are moving from experimentation to intelligent, automated decision-making</a>&nbsp;“As AI-generated code becomes increasingly prevalent, the volume of code being created is growing significantly. In this environment, the ability to comprehend, interpret and effectively review code written collaboratively by engineers and AI agents will become just as important as writing new code. The engineers of the future will need to excel not only at creation, but also at understanding, validating and integrating work across human and AI contributors. But technology is only one part of the equation. The real value comes from combining it with deep domain expertise, curiosity, collaboration and human judgment. As India looks towards 2047, I believe our engineers will play an important role in building capabilities that strengthen businesses, improve customer experiences and deliver sustainable, long-term value,” he added.&nbsp;Ponni Carlin, Co-founder &amp; COO, iVP Semi, said," The prototype is the easy part. Getting from a board that works on a bench to a product that can be built, tested and shipped the same way ten thousand times, that is where engineering in India is genuinely changing. The engineers who matter most to us now think about test coverage, documentation and sourcing while they are still drawing the schematic, not six months later. Automation and AI have absorbed much of the repetitive work, so judgement is what remains: how a product is qualified, where it is sourced, how it will perform in a customer's system."&nbsp;“Viksit Bharat 2047 will not be built on prototypes. It will be built by engineers who can carry a design all the way to volume production and keep it there. That is the capability India is still building, and every engineer who acquires it makes the country a little less dependent on someone else's supply chain,” Carlin added.<h3>Engineering challenge for generation capacity</h3>Simarpreet Singh, Executive Director and CEO, Hartek Power, said, "India's journey towards Viksit Bharat 2047 is fundamentally an engineering journey. As the country scales renewable energy in India, strengthens its power infrastructure and builds a more resilient energy ecosystem, the role of engineers is moving well beyond conventional project execution. At Hartek Power, we see this transformation closely through our work as one of the leading solar EPC companies, alongside grid connectivity, smart grid solutions, and substation infrastructure, as well as emerging areas such as battery energy storage systems. With India targeting a significantly larger share of clean energy in its power mix, the engineering challenge is no longer simply about adding generation capacity. It is about ensuring that this capacity can be integrated into the grid efficiently, reliably and sustainably."&nbsp;He noted that this is also changing the capabilities expected from the next generation of engineers and added that technical expertise is set to remain the foundation; however, engineers will increasingly need to understand digitalisation, automation, energy storage, data-driven decision-making and evolving smart grid system technologies.&nbsp;“Most importantly, they will need the ability to look at infrastructure as an interconnected ecosystem rather than as individual projects. For India, scale will be equally important. The technologies that shape Viksit Bharat 2047 must be adapted to Indian requirements and deployed in a manner that is commercially viable, resilient and capable of serving a rapidly growing economy a responsibility that renewable energy companies and EPC companies in India increasingly share. National Engineers' Day is therefore an opportunity to recognise not only the contribution engineers have made to India's development, but also the responsibility they carry for shaping the future of solar energy and its infrastructure. The engineer of 2047 will not merely build infrastructure; they will help design the systems, technologies and solutions that enable a more sustainable, connected and developed India,” he added.&nbsp;Sriram Lakshminarayanan, President of Honeywell Technology &amp; Connected Solutions (HTCS), Honeywell Technologies said," As India advances towards Viksit Bharat 2047, engineers are evolving from technical problem-solvers to architects of innovation, business transformation and national progress. At Honeywell Technologies, where HTCS serves as our global engineering and technology powerhouse, we see this shift firsthand. Our teams work across the entire innovation lifecycle, from new product development and AI-powered R&amp;D to deployment and lifecycle support, helping turn breakthrough ideas into real-world outcomes. What is particularly exciting today is that many of these innovations are being engineered in India for global impact."&nbsp;He added that across smart buildings, industrial automation, energy transition and critical infrastructure, engineers are helping build solutions that are safer, more efficient and more sustainable. According to him, automation, AI and digital technologies are speeding up the pace of innovation, allowing engineers to tackle increasingly complex challenges at scale. As India progresses toward its 2047 vision, he believes engineers who blend deep domain expertise with digital, AI and systems-thinking skills will play a defining role in shaping a more resilient and self-reliant future.

India is making a spectacular shift from basic software services and IT outsourcing toward advanced deep-tech, semiconductor manufacturing, and artificial intelligence. It is also engineering domestic data centres, sovereign AI systems, and semiconductor fabrication.

When India marks its 100 years of independence by 2047, the country's growth will not be only assessed by how fast it grows, but how and what it builds for own and the world. The questions will hover around global technology cycles: whether India remains a consumer or becomes an architect of the systems the world depends on. In terms of development in engineering and technology sectors, India is making a spectacular shift from basic software services and IT outsourcing toward advanced deep-tech, semiconductor manufacturing, and artificial intelligence. It is also engineering domestic data centres, sovereign AI systems, and semiconductor fabrication to control its own technological infrastructure. Civil and structural engineering now relies heavily on LiDAR, drone surveys, Building Information Modelling (BIM), and 3D terrain modelling to accelerate large-scale infrastructure delivery. The focus has also expanded to a full-stack model combining physical assets with advanced computing, quantum research, and green manufacturing (such as hydrogen and advanced battery R&D). In the education sector, engineering and workforce training are moving toward outcome-based learning, automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence to close the country's technical skill gaps. Out of these, how can we miss about the engineering and technological advancement of ISRO? Currently, ISRO is shifting routine rocket and satellite manufacturing to the private sector so it can focus on advanced research, human spaceflight, and deep-space exploration. India's engineering making fundamental transformation In response to the changing engineering landscape, industry leaders say the profession itself is undergoing a quiet but fundamental transformation, one being driven as much by artificial intelligence and automation as by the scale of the country's ambitions for 2047, when India aims to become a fully developed nation. They noted that across sectors ranging from financial technology to semiconductors, renewable energy and industrial automation, engineers are being asked to do more than solve technical problems. They are increasingly expected to work alongside business teams, understand end-to-end systems, and take responsibility for outcomes rather than just outputs. Shishir Saxena, Head of Solution Architecture - Record Keeping Platforms, Fidelity International, said, "The role of an engineer is evolving rapidly. It is increasingly not just about solving technical challenges, but about working closely with business teams to build solutions that create meaningful client outcomes. India’s engineering talent is uniquely positioned to do this at scale, contributing to global initiatives and helping solve complex challenges across markets. AI, automation and advanced data capabilities are giving our engineering teams powerful new ways to experiment, work more efficiently and focus on the problems that matter most." Also read: From AI adoption to AI execution: How enterprises are moving from experimentation to intelligent, automated decision-making “As AI-generated code becomes increasingly prevalent, the volume of code being created is growing significantly. In this environment, the ability to comprehend, interpret and effectively review code written collaboratively by engineers and AI agents will become just as important as writing new code. The engineers of the future will need to excel not only at creation, but also at understanding, validating and integrating work across human and AI contributors. But technology is only one part of the equation. The real value comes from combining it with deep domain expertise, curiosity, collaboration and human judgment. As India looks towards 2047, I believe our engineers will play an important role in building capabilities that strengthen businesses, improve customer experiences and deliver sustainable, long-term value,” he added. Ponni Carlin, Co-founder & COO, iVP Semi, said," The prototype is the easy part. Getting from a board that works on a bench to a product that can be built, tested and shipped the same way ten thousand times, that is where engineering in India is genuinely changing. The engineers who matter most to us now think about test coverage, documentation and sourcing while they are still drawing the schematic, not six months later. Automation and AI have absorbed much of the repetitive work, so judgement is what remains: how a product is qualified, where it is sourced, how it will perform in a customer's system." “Viksit Bharat 2047 will not be built on prototypes. It will be built by engineers who can carry a design all the way to volume production and keep it there. That is the capability India is still building, and every engineer who acquires it makes the country a little less dependent on someone else's supply chain,” Carlin added. Engineering challenge for generation capacity Simarpreet Singh, Executive Director and CEO, Hartek Power, said, "India's journey towards Viksit Bharat 2047 is fundamentally an engineering journey. As the country scales renewable energy in India, strengthens its power infrastructure and builds a more resilient energy ecosystem, the role of engineers is moving well beyond conventional project execution. At Hartek Power, we see this transformation closely through our work as one of the leading solar EPC companies, alongside grid connectivity, smart grid solutions, and substation infrastructure, as well as emerging areas such as battery energy storage systems. With India targeting a significantly larger share of clean energy in its power mix, the engineering challenge is no longer simply about adding generation capacity. It is about ensuring that this capacity can be integrated into the grid efficiently, reliably and sustainably." He noted that this is also changing the capabilities expected from the next generation of engineers and added that technical expertise is set to remain the foundation; however, engineers will increasingly need to understand digitalisation, automation, energy storage, data-driven decision-making and evolving smart grid system technologies. “Most importantly, they will need the ability to look at infrastructure as an interconnected ecosystem rather than as individual projects. For India, scale will be equally important. The technologies that shape Viksit Bharat 2047 must be adapted to Indian requirements and deployed in a manner that is commercially viable, resilient and capable of serving a rapidly growing economy a responsibility that renewable energy companies and EPC companies in India increasingly share. National Engineers' Day is therefore an opportunity to recognise not only the contribution engineers have made to India's development, but also the responsibility they carry for shaping the future of solar energy and its infrastructure. The engineer of 2047 will not merely build infrastructure; they will help design the systems, technologies and solutions that enable a more sustainable, connected and developed India,” he added. Sriram Lakshminarayanan, President of Honeywell Technology & Connected Solutions (HTCS), Honeywell Technologies said," As India advances towards Viksit Bharat 2047, engineers are evolving from technical problem-solvers to architects of innovation, business transformation and national progress. At Honeywell Technologies, where HTCS serves as our global engineering and technology powerhouse, we see this shift firsthand. Our teams work across the entire innovation lifecycle, from new product development and AI-powered R&D to deployment and lifecycle support, helping turn breakthrough ideas into real-world outcomes. What is particularly exciting today is that many of these innovations are being engineered in India for global impact." He added that across smart buildings, industrial automation, energy transition and critical infrastructure, engineers are helping build solutions that are safer, more efficient and more sustainable. According to him, automation, AI and digital technologies are speeding up the pace of innovation, allowing engineers to tackle increasingly complex challenges at scale. As India progresses toward its 2047 vision, he believes engineers who blend deep domain expertise with digital, AI and systems-thinking skills will play a defining role in shaping a more resilient and self-reliant future.

India is making a spectacular shift from basic software services and IT outsourcing toward advanced deep-tech, semiconductor manufacturing, and artificial intelligence. It is also engineering domestic data centres, sovereign AI systems, and semiconductor fabrication.

National Engineering Day 2026: How is India's engineering changing as country moves towards Viksit Bharat 2047?

Shares of tech companies linked to artificial intelligence (AI) witnessed sharp falls on Monday following calls by AI bosses for a slowdown in the uncontrolled development of the technology. In South Korea, shares of chipmaker SK Hynix fell 6.4% while Samsung Electronics dropped 4.1%. Japan’s Softbank, which is a major investor in OpenAI, plunged more than 10%.Tech stocks in Europe also followed the trend, as Germany’s Infineon, which designs and manufactures semiconductors, was down 7.6%, while Dutch chip giant ASML fell 5.2%.&nbsp;The US stock markets also opened down as investors reacted to the calls from tech bosses to slow down the pace of AI development.The Nasdaq, which is dominated by tech companies, witnessed a big dip in early trading, with shares falling 1.2%.The S&amp;P 500 followed with a drop of 0.7%, while the Dow Jones was down 0.27%.&nbsp;&nbsp;As for individula tech shares, Hewlett Packard was down 10%; Intel and Sandisk by 7%; Qualcomm and Micron by 6%, Oracle 5%, and Nvidia fell 3%.&nbsp;The stocks tumbled after the bosses of Anthropic, OpenAI and SpaceX called for a slowdown in the “reckless” development, citing fears the technology could soon run out of control.The South Korean Kospi stock index, which relies heavily on chip makers that supply AI companies, dropped by 3%.Shares in the big global microchip supplier Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company dropped 1.2%. Futures for the Nasdaq pointed to a 1.3% drop in the tech-heavy index when the US stock market opens.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/want-to-reset-ties-with-india-have-engagement-based-on-mutual-interests-says-bangladesh-minister-1789326034045">‘Want to reset ties with India, have engagement based on mutual interests,’ says Bangladesh minister</a><h2>Stocks of firms threatened by rise of AI witness rally</h2>&nbsp;In contrast, there was a rally in shares of companies that have been threatened by the rise of AI, including the advertising group WPP, which rose by 3.1%, and the analytics business Relx, which rose 4.2%.&nbsp;Relx stocks fell sharply earlier this year after Anthropic launched a suite of new data and automation tools.&nbsp;The markets swung after the chief executive of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, appealed for the AI industry to “slow down”.He said that “building too fast is reckless”, warning that a swarm of AI agents could cause hundreds of billions of dollars of damage by “taking over the entire internet” in the future.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-tells-ukraine-to-stop-targeting-russian-refineries-says-attacks-causing-shortage-of-diesel-1789316749492">Trump tells Ukraine to stop targeting Russian refineries, says attacks causing shortage of diesel</a><h2>Some experts dispute claims of Anthropic’s Dario Amodei</h2>&nbsp;Though some experts disputed Amodei’s claims, investors began to price in a slowdown that would make it harder for the industry to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars in investments in AI infrastructure.&nbsp;OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, the Google DeepMind chief, Demis Hassabis, and SpaceX boss, Elon Musk, all posted support for Amodei’s essay on slowing AI development, titled “We Must Pace the Frontier”.Altman added that he would match Amodei’s commitment to embedding outside evaluators within his company to verify safety practices.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-condemns-attack-on-merchant-vessel-off-oman-coast-13-indian-crew-rescued-one-missing-1789311950141">India condemns attack on merchant vessel off Oman coast; 13 Indian crew rescued, one missing</a>&nbsp;Fears continue to grow over the hurried pace and lack of regulation in AI development.&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, China’s top intelligence official has warned that the use of AI by adversaries could pose a risk to the country’s political and social security.Chen Yixin wrote in a government outlet on Sunday that advanced US models such as Anthropic’s Mythos and OpenAI’s GPT-5.5-Cyber could pose serious risks to Beijing’s critical information infrastructure, and called for a comprehensive strengthening of AI security.&nbsp;Conversely, US President Donald Trump rejected the calls to pace AI development. The US president told reporters over the weekend, “We’re leading China in AI. We’re the most sophisticated country in the world and frankly, I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI, wins.”

In contrast, there was a rally in shares of companies that have been threatened by the rise of AI, including the advertising group WPP, which rose by 3.1%, and the analytics business Relx, which rose 4.2%. Relx stocks fell sharply earlier this year after Anthropic launched a suite of tools.

Shares of tech companies linked to artificial intelligence (AI) witnessed sharp falls on Monday following calls by AI bosses for a slowdown in the uncontrolled development of the technology. In South Korea, shares of chipmaker SK Hynix fell 6.4% while Samsung Electronics dropped 4.1%. Japan’s Softbank, which is a major investor in OpenAI, plunged more than 10%. Tech stocks in Europe also followed the trend, as Germany’s Infineon, which designs and manufactures semiconductors, was down 7.6%, while Dutch chip giant ASML fell 5.2%. The US stock markets also opened down as investors reacted to the calls from tech bosses to slow down the pace of AI development. The Nasdaq, which is dominated by tech companies, witnessed a big dip in early trading, with shares falling 1.2%. The S&P 500 followed with a drop of 0.7%, while the Dow Jones was down 0.27%. As for individula tech shares, Hewlett Packard was down 10%; Intel and Sandisk by 7%; Qualcomm and Micron by 6%, Oracle 5%, and Nvidia fell 3%. The stocks tumbled after the bosses of Anthropic, OpenAI and SpaceX called for a slowdown in the “reckless” development, citing fears the technology could soon run out of control. The South Korean Kospi stock index, which relies heavily on chip makers that supply AI companies, dropped by 3%. Shares in the big global microchip supplier Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company dropped 1.2%. Futures for the Nasdaq pointed to a 1.3% drop in the tech-heavy index when the US stock market opens. Also Read: ‘Want to reset ties with India, have engagement based on mutual interests,’ says Bangladesh minister Stocks of firms threatened by rise of AI witness rally In contrast, there was a rally in shares of companies that have been threatened by the rise of AI, including the advertising group WPP, which rose by 3.1%, and the analytics business Relx, which rose 4.2%. Relx stocks fell sharply earlier this year after Anthropic launched a suite of new data and automation tools. The markets swung after the chief executive of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, appealed for the AI industry to “slow down”. He said that “building too fast is reckless”, warning that a swarm of AI agents could cause hundreds of billions of dollars of damage by “taking over the entire internet” in the future. Also Read: Trump tells Ukraine to stop targeting Russian refineries, says attacks causing shortage of diesel Some experts dispute claims of Anthropic’s Dario Amodei Though some experts disputed Amodei’s claims, investors began to price in a slowdown that would make it harder for the industry to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars in investments in AI infrastructure. OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, the Google DeepMind chief, Demis Hassabis, and SpaceX boss, Elon Musk, all posted support for Amodei’s essay on slowing AI development, titled “We Must Pace the Frontier”. Altman added that he would match Amodei’s commitment to embedding outside evaluators within his company to verify safety practices. Also Read: India condemns attack on merchant vessel off Oman coast; 13 Indian crew rescued, one missing Fears continue to grow over the hurried pace and lack of regulation in AI development. Meanwhile, China’s top intelligence official has warned that the use of AI by adversaries could pose a risk to the country’s political and social security. Chen Yixin wrote in a government outlet on Sunday that advanced US models such as Anthropic’s Mythos and OpenAI’s GPT-5.5-Cyber could pose serious risks to Beijing’s critical information infrastructure, and called for a comprehensive strengthening of AI security. Conversely, US President Donald Trump rejected the calls to pace AI development. The US president told reporters over the weekend, “We’re leading China in AI. We’re the most sophisticated country in the world and frankly, I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI, wins.”

In contrast, there was a rally in shares of companies that have been threatened by the rise of AI, including the advertising group WPP, which rose by 3.1%, and the analytics business Relx, which rose 4.2%. Relx stocks fell sharply earlier this year after Anthropic launched a suite of tools.

Tech stocks fall after AI bosses call for a slowdown in ‘reckless’ progress

Mark Zuckerberg quietly spent much of 2026 trying to redesign Meta around artificial intelligence, including plans that considered cutting some teams by as much as 60%, according to internal planning documents and people familiar with the effort.&nbsp;The project, known internally as Project OT, or Organization Transformation, was developed during Meta’s leadership retreat in Hawaii. The idea was radical: smaller groups of highly skilled employees would oversee AI-powered virtual workers and handle work that previously required much larger teams. Meta eventually carried out a 10% workforce reduction in May, affecting roughly 8,000 jobs, but Zuckerberg cancelled a planned second wave in November.<h2>Zuckerberg’s AI-native blueprint</h2>Project OT was not simply a layoff exercise.The plan envisaged product teams of around 10 to 20 people being replaced by pods of three to five. Engineers, designers and researchers could also be grouped under the broader title of “builder”. Middle-management layers would be reduced, with unit heads overseeing larger groups while pod leads handled day-to-day work without formal management authority. An early pilot created five small teams that built prototypes in four-week cycles instead of following much longer planning processes. Meta also developed tools to identify highly valuable employees who would be worth retaining even as teams became smaller.<h2>AI transformation creates its own problems</h2>The restructuring did not go smoothly. Employees objected after Meta began using software that captured keyboard and mouse activity on US laptops to help train AI agents to perform computer tasks. More than 1,000 employees signed a petition opposing the programme.Internal employee sentiment also dropped sharply, while Meta's own data raised questions about whether smaller teams were actually delivering more. Code changes increased 220% year-on-year, but changes reaching users rose only 36%. Major technical and security incidents also increased, according to the reported internal data. The result was a growing gap between the promise of AI-powered productivity and the complexity of running a huge technology company.<h2>Meta is now bringing managers back</h2>The most striking twist has come inside Meta's new Applied AI division. Around 7,000 employees were moved into the group this year, including some managers who had been shifted into individual contributor roles. Now, some of those employees are being offered a voluntary route back into management. That move comes after Zuckerberg acknowledged that the reorganisation had been mistimed and that AI agents had not advanced as quickly as he expected. Meta ended the second quarter with 75,472 employees and has committed enormous resources to AI infrastructure. The lesson from Project OT may therefore be more complicated than simply “AI needs fewer workers”. Meta wanted AI to allow fewer humans to run more work. Instead, it is discovering that building an AI-native company may itself require a substantial human layer to manage, supervise and fix what AI cannot yet handle.

Meta’s secret Project OT explored shrinking some teams by up to 60% as Mark Zuckerberg pushed to make the company AI-native. After an 8,000-job May cut, Meta cancelled its planned November layoff wave and is now offering some former managers a route back into management.

Mark Zuckerberg quietly spent much of 2026 trying to redesign Meta around artificial intelligence, including plans that considered cutting some teams by as much as 60%, according to internal planning documents and people familiar with the effort. The project, known internally as Project OT, or Organization Transformation, was developed during Meta’s leadership retreat in Hawaii. The idea was radical: smaller groups of highly skilled employees would oversee AI-powered virtual workers and handle work that previously required much larger teams. Meta eventually carried out a 10% workforce reduction in May, affecting roughly 8,000 jobs, but Zuckerberg cancelled a planned second wave in November. Zuckerberg’s AI-native blueprint Project OT was not simply a layoff exercise. The plan envisaged product teams of around 10 to 20 people being replaced by pods of three to five. Engineers, designers and researchers could also be grouped under the broader title of “builder”. Middle-management layers would be reduced, with unit heads overseeing larger groups while pod leads handled day-to-day work without formal management authority. An early pilot created five small teams that built prototypes in four-week cycles instead of following much longer planning processes. Meta also developed tools to identify highly valuable employees who would be worth retaining even as teams became smaller. AI transformation creates its own problems The restructuring did not go smoothly. Employees objected after Meta began using software that captured keyboard and mouse activity on US laptops to help train AI agents to perform computer tasks. More than 1,000 employees signed a petition opposing the programme. Internal employee sentiment also dropped sharply, while Meta's own data raised questions about whether smaller teams were actually delivering more. Code changes increased 220% year-on-year, but changes reaching users rose only 36%. Major technical and security incidents also increased, according to the reported internal data. The result was a growing gap between the promise of AI-powered productivity and the complexity of running a huge technology company. Meta is now bringing managers back The most striking twist has come inside Meta's new Applied AI division. Around 7,000 employees were moved into the group this year, including some managers who had been shifted into individual contributor roles. Now, some of those employees are being offered a voluntary route back into management. That move comes after Zuckerberg acknowledged that the reorganisation had been mistimed and that AI agents had not advanced as quickly as he expected. Meta ended the second quarter with 75,472 employees and has committed enormous resources to AI infrastructure. The lesson from Project OT may therefore be more complicated than simply “AI needs fewer workers”. Meta wanted AI to allow fewer humans to run more work. Instead, it is discovering that building an AI-native company may itself require a substantial human layer to manage, supervise and fix what AI cannot yet handle.

Meta’s secret Project OT explored shrinking some teams by up to 60% as Mark Zuckerberg pushed to make the company AI-native. After an 8,000-job May cut, Meta cancelled its planned November layoff wave and is now offering some former managers a route back into management.

Mark Zuckerberg’s secret Meta plan could have cut some teams by 60% to make AI run the company

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has entered the growing debate over how quickly artificial intelligence should advance, saying any pursuit of superintelligence must ultimately help humanity and remain under human control.Nadella's comments come days after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for the AI industry to “pace the frontier” and give safety work more time to keep up with rapidly improving models. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk have also backed parts of Amodei's proposal. The Microsoft chief's message adds a different dimension to the debate: AI safety should not mean putting control of the technology in the hands of only a few companies.<h2> Nadella's condition for superintelligence</h2>Nadella said the development of superintelligence should be based on a simple principle: if AI does not help humanity and cannot remain under human control, it is not worth pursuing. He also argued that the benefits of advanced AI should spread across countries, communities and companies. That means, in his view, the future AI ecosystem should include both closed and open-source models, rather than being controlled by a small number of frontier labs.<h2> Why Nadella wants ‘deliberate pacing’</h2>Nadella said Microsoft supports research, focus and “deliberate pacing” so that alignment and safety are built into AI systems as they become more capable. He also welcomed the idea of embedded evaluators independent experts who can examine whether companies are actually following their safety commitments. That idea comes directly from Amodei's recent proposal. Anthropic has committed to giving third-party evaluators ongoing, employee-like access to its systems. Altman has said OpenAI will adopt a similar approach.But Nadella also stressed another issue that matters to businesses. He wants organisations to retain control of their own knowledge and AI learning processes instead of becoming permanently dependent on one model provider.Companies, he argued, should be able to put their own knowledge into models and control the resulting systems.<h2>Microsoft promises a new AI ‘Code of Conduct’</h2>Nadella said Microsoft's first-party MAI models will also have a “Code of Conduct”, which the company plans to publish for public consultation. His comments come as the AI industry faces a rare moment of agreement over the need for stronger safeguards.Amodei has warned that rapidly improving AI could create serious risks, including loss of control, cyberattacks and biological misuse. His proposal calls for industry coordination and eventually international cooperation. Altman has backed the call to “pace the frontier”, while Musk simply responded to Amodei's proposal: “Dario is right.”The debate is now shifting from whether AI should advance to a harder question: how fast should it advance, who should control it, and who gets to decide when a powerful AI system is safe enough to deploy? Nadella's answer is becoming clear: progress can continue, but human control cannot be the part that gets left behind.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has backed a more deliberate approach to advanced AI development, saying superintelligence must help humanity and remain under human control. He also wants broader access to AI while allowing businesses to retain control over their own models and knowledge.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has entered the growing debate over how quickly artificial intelligence should advance, saying any pursuit of superintelligence must ultimately help humanity and remain under human control. Nadella's comments come days after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for the AI industry to “pace the frontier” and give safety work more time to keep up with rapidly improving models. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk have also backed parts of Amodei's proposal. The Microsoft chief's message adds a different dimension to the debate: AI safety should not mean putting control of the technology in the hands of only a few companies. Nadella's condition for superintelligence Nadella said the development of superintelligence should be based on a simple principle: if AI does not help humanity and cannot remain under human control, it is not worth pursuing. He also argued that the benefits of advanced AI should spread across countries, communities and companies. That means, in his view, the future AI ecosystem should include both closed and open-source models, rather than being controlled by a small number of frontier labs. Why Nadella wants ‘deliberate pacing’ Nadella said Microsoft supports research, focus and “deliberate pacing” so that alignment and safety are built into AI systems as they become more capable. He also welcomed the idea of embedded evaluators independent experts who can examine whether companies are actually following their safety commitments. That idea comes directly from Amodei's recent proposal. Anthropic has committed to giving third-party evaluators ongoing, employee-like access to its systems. Altman has said OpenAI will adopt a similar approach. But Nadella also stressed another issue that matters to businesses. He wants organisations to retain control of their own knowledge and AI learning processes instead of becoming permanently dependent on one model provider. Companies, he argued, should be able to put their own knowledge into models and control the resulting systems. Microsoft promises a new AI ‘Code of Conduct’ Nadella said Microsoft's first-party MAI models will also have a “Code of Conduct”, which the company plans to publish for public consultation. His comments come as the AI industry faces a rare moment of agreement over the need for stronger safeguards. Amodei has warned that rapidly improving AI could create serious risks, including loss of control, cyberattacks and biological misuse. His proposal calls for industry coordination and eventually international cooperation. Altman has backed the call to “pace the frontier”, while Musk simply responded to Amodei's proposal: “Dario is right.” The debate is now shifting from whether AI should advance to a harder question: how fast should it advance, who should control it, and who gets to decide when a powerful AI system is safe enough to deploy? Nadella's answer is becoming clear: progress can continue, but human control cannot be the part that gets left behind.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has backed a more deliberate approach to advanced AI development, saying superintelligence must help humanity and remain under human control. He also wants broader access to AI while allowing businesses to retain control over their own models and knowledge.

‘AI must remain under human control’: Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella backs slower development

technology

Technology, News on Technology, stories on Technology, articles on Technology, Technology stories at Wion, Technology news, Technology latest news

technology

Samsung raises Galaxy S26 prices by Rs 20,000: Here’s what each model now costs

Microsoft executive warned AI could undermine the web that feeds it

‘0% chance’: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang dismisses AI extinction fears by 2030

Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google face lawsuit over 'agreement' on slowdown

AI models could get a ‘kill switch’ in California under Newsom’s new order

Researchers hack OpenAI systems using Anthropic's AI security tool

iPhone 18 hits India: Buyers spend lakhs as festive electronics prices climb

Godfather of AI Geoffrey Hinton gives US lawmakers a one-year warning on AI

No social media under 13? What the EU’s new Kids Act proposes

iPhone 18 Pro, Pro Max go on sale: Apple Stores see long queues across India

Who decides what AI can do in a war? Anthropic is hiring for that job

Without local cloud, Nigeria's data will remain abroad: Engr. Nnamani warns

Google DeepMind launches new institute to study how AGI could change society

Claude gets a major upgrade: Anthropic brings chat, work tools and design into one place

PM Modi spells out India's big semiconductor vision at SEMICON India

House votes 417-3 to pass Ratepayer Protection Act to curb AI data center costs

OpenAI reveals 6 fresh cases of AI models going rogue: 'You do not answer to...'

Nvidia CEO says AI companies should regulate themselves, not slow development

‘5 lakh fake Gmail IDs uncovered’: Why Gujarat police want answers from Google

Apple iPhone users may get relief as India escalates iOS 18 warranty probe

‘AI has the potential to kill us all’: Ex-DeepMind researcher sounds alarm

AI deepfake crackdown: New York shuts 12 websites after 1,200 people targeted

How is India's engineering changing as country moves towards Viksit Bharat 2047?

Tech stocks fall after AI bosses call for a slowdown in ‘reckless’ progress

Meta’s AI gamble: Why Zuckerberg planned teams of just three to five people

Satya Nadella backs Dario Amodei’s AI safety push: ‘Under human control’