UNSC: NATO Airspace Violations Spark Tensions Between West and Russia at UN

UNSC: NATO nations have accused Russia of breaching the airspace of Estonia, Poland, and Romania, while Moscow denied the allegations, calling the European claims unfounded.


UNSC: NATO Airspace Violations Spark Tensions Between West and Russia at UN 

The United Nations Security Council has voted not to permanently lift economic sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, delivering a major economic blow that Tehran claims is “politically biased”.


BREAKING: UNSC Votes to Reinstate Sanctions on Iran’s Nuclear Program

NATO announced plans to beef up the defence of Europe's eastern flank on Friday, two days after Poland shot down drones that had violated its airspace in the first known action of its kind by a member of the Western alliance during Russia's war in Ukraine.


Poland-Russia tensions: UNSC holds meet to discuss drone incursion into Poland's airspace

Israel-Gaza War: UN Chief Condemns 'Endless Catalogue of Horrors' in Gaza | WION World News


Israel-Gaza War: UN Chief Condemns 'Endless Catalogue of Horrors' in Gaza | WION

UN agencies hold urgent briefing on new IPC report detailing the worsening famine crisis in Gaza. Latest IPC report reveals critical food insecurity in Gaza; UN agencies call for immediate humanitarian action. UN experts warn of escalating famine conditions in Gaza as new IPC data is released. Press briefing highlights dire food shortages in Gaza amid ongoing conflict, according to UN agencies. New IPC findings show Gaza facing severe famine risk; UN agencies urge swift response.


Gaza Famine: Israel Rejects IPC Report, Says 'No Famine in Gaza' | WION 

India slammed Pakistan at the UN Security Council after Islamabad raised sexual violence allegations in Jammu and Kashmir. Citing Pakistan's "shameful record" from 1971 and ongoing abuses against minority women, India called out the hypocrisy and demanded justice for victims.

India slams Pakistan at UNSC over minority conversions 

Attempts to rake Kashmir at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on Monday, under the chairmanship of Pakistan's foreign minister Ishaq Dar, fell flat. The effort met with little traction, as only Türkiye mentioned Kashmir, while major powers and permanent members of the council – the United States, China, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom – refrained from directly referring to it.Pakistan is a non-permanent member of the UNSC for a 2-year term, ending in December of next year, and for the current month is the chair of the council. Under its chairmanship, it is holding two open debates, one of which took place on Monday under the theme “Promoting International Peace and Security through Multilateralism and the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes.” Pakistan is expected to hold another open debate this week.During his opening address, Foreign Minister Dar not only raised Kashmir but also India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty. The treaty was put in "abeyance" by India after the April Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistan-trained terrorists. Dar said, "Jammu and Kashmir remains one of the oldest disputes on the agenda of the UN Security Council....", adding that the Indus water treaty has "withstood periods of trials and tribulations in bilateral relations...".India was quick to dismiss the Pakistani comments. Pointing to India's "zero tolerance for terrorism" India's Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, said, “it ill behoves a member of the Council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community.”India’s position on Kashmir has long rested on the 1972 Simla Agreement and the 1999 Lahore Declaration, both of which mandate bilateral resolution of disputes between the two nations. Pakistan’s repeated attempts to raise Kashmir at the UNSC have historically faltered, as most council members view it as a bilateral matter. Monday’s debate was no exception, with Pakistan’s agenda failing to gain momentum beyond Türkiye’s endorsement.The Turkish diplomat at the meeting said, "In South Asia, the Kashmir issue remains one of the longest-standing unresolved international disputes and obstructs Pakistan-India relations to the extent of triggering military clashes. We firmly support a just and lasting resolution through constructive dialogue between the parties". The Turkish stance comes amid Erdogan's support for Islamabad during the May conflict, including the usage of Turkish drones against India.<h2>India counters US claims at UNSC</h2>"US leadership delivers de-escalations...between India and Pakistan", the US diplomat said at the UNSC meeting, restating Trump's comments. US President Trump has been claiming that he was responsible for the ceasefire understanding between India and Pakistan during the May conflict, something that Delhi has dismissed several times.India's ambassador to the UN dismissed the US claims at UNSC. He said India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK), "which was focused, measured, and non-escalatory in nature" and on "achieving its primary objectives, a cessation of military activities was directly concluded at the request of Pakistan."

Pakistan’s repeated attempts to raise Kashmir at the UNSC have historically faltered, as most council members view it as a bilateral matter. Monday’s debate was no exception, with Pakistan’s agenda failing to gain momentum beyond Türkiye’s endorsement.

Attempts to rake Kashmir at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on Monday, under the chairmanship of Pakistan's foreign minister Ishaq Dar, fell flat. The effort met with little traction, as only Türkiye mentioned Kashmir, while major powers and permanent members of the council – the United States, China, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom – refrained from directly referring to it. Pakistan is a non-permanent member of the UNSC for a 2-year term, ending in December of next year, and for the current month is the chair of the council. Under its chairmanship, it is holding two open debates, one of which took place on Monday under the theme “Promoting International Peace and Security through Multilateralism and the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes.” Pakistan is expected to hold another open debate this week. During his opening address, Foreign Minister Dar not only raised Kashmir but also India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty. The treaty was put in "abeyance" by India after the April Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistan-trained terrorists. Dar said, "Jammu and Kashmir remains one of the oldest disputes on the agenda of the UN Security Council....", adding that the Indus water treaty has "withstood periods of trials and tribulations in bilateral relations...". India was quick to dismiss the Pakistani comments. Pointing to India's "zero tolerance for terrorism" India's Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, said, “it ill behoves a member of the Council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community.” India’s position on Kashmir has long rested on the 1972 Simla Agreement and the 1999 Lahore Declaration, both of which mandate bilateral resolution of disputes between the two nations. Pakistan’s repeated attempts to raise Kashmir at the UNSC have historically faltered, as most council members view it as a bilateral matter. Monday’s debate was no exception, with Pakistan’s agenda failing to gain momentum beyond Türkiye’s endorsement. The Turkish diplomat at the meeting said, "In South Asia, the Kashmir issue remains one of the longest-standing unresolved international disputes and obstructs Pakistan-India relations to the extent of triggering military clashes. We firmly support a just and lasting resolution through constructive dialogue between the parties". The Turkish stance comes amid Erdogan's support for Islamabad during the May conflict, including the usage of Turkish drones against India. India counters US claims at UNSC "US leadership delivers de-escalations...between India and Pakistan", the US diplomat said at the UNSC meeting, restating Trump's comments. US President Trump has been claiming that he was responsible for the ceasefire understanding between India and Pakistan during the May conflict, something that Delhi has dismissed several times. India's ambassador to the UN dismissed the US claims at UNSC. He said India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK), "which was focused, measured, and non-escalatory in nature" and on "achieving its primary objectives, a cessation of military activities was directly concluded at the request of Pakistan."

Pakistan’s repeated attempts to raise Kashmir at the UNSC have historically faltered, as most council members view it as a bilateral matter. Monday’s debate was no exception, with Pakistan’s agenda failing to gain momentum beyond Türkiye’s endorsement.

No takers for Kashmir during Pakistan FM Dar's chairmanship of UNSC

In an address to the United Nations Security Council on Friday (June 20), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief General Rafael Grossi warned that attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities have sharply degraded their safety and posed serious radiological and environmental risks. Grossi confirmed that Israel’s recent strikes have targeted key facilities such as Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan, Arak, and Karaj, prompting global concern.&nbsp;According to Grossi, the Natanz enrichment site suffered extensive damage, including the destruction of electrical infrastructure and serious damage to its underground cascade halls. Though external radiation levels remained normal, Grossi stressed that the internal radiological and chemical contamination, including uranium hexafluoride and uranyl fluoride, posed a significant threat to personnel within the site.&nbsp;Fordow, a critical site for enriching uranium to 60%, has remained undamaged, Grossi stated. Meanwhile, the Esfahan site sustained damage to four facilities. Similar attacks were confirmed at Arak’s Heavy Water Reactor and the Karaj workshop, although no radiological release occurred.&nbsp;Of utmost concern is the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, where a direct hit could result in catastrophic radioactive release, affecting populations across Iran and beyond. Grossi warned that an attack or even a disruption of the plant’s power supply could lead to a core meltdown and long-term environmental consequences.&nbsp;The IAEA Director General called for immediate de-escalation, warning that “armed attacks on nuclear facilities should never occur” and could result in grave consequences within and beyond the state attacked. He urged the Security Council and international community to support the Agency’s role in verifying that Iran’s nuclear materials — including over 400 kg of uranium enriched to 60% — remain accounted for and secure.&nbsp;Reiterating the Agency’s commitment to remain present and operational in Iran despite security constraints, Grossi said, “The IAEA can guarantee, through a watertight inspection regime, that nuclear weapons will not be developed in Iran.” He called for a constructive, professional dialogue with all parties, emphasizing that “nuclear facilities and material must not be shrouded by the fog of war” and reminding the Council that a diplomatic solution is within reach if supported by the necessary political will.&nbsp;The IAEA chief also said that Middle East faces a nuclear disaster if Israel attacks Iran's southern nuclear facility of Bushehr, the UN nuclear watchdog chief warned on Friday.&nbsp;International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director Rafael Grossi informed the UN Security Council that he has not yet seen radiation emanating from Israel's week-long aerial campaign on Iran, including strikes on nuclear facilities. But he added that an attack on Bushehr -- the Middle East's first civilian nuclear reactor, which has so far seemed to have been left intact -- would mean the gravest consequences because it holds thousands of kilograms of nuclear material.&nbsp;"Regional countries have come directly to me in the last few hours to communicate their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and perfectly clear -- a direct hit on the Bushehr nuclear power plant would entail a very high release of radioactivity," Grossi said.&nbsp;Grossi cautioned of just as bad effects even if Israel targets the lines powering electricity to Bushehr, as such disabling of power could lead to a meltdown. A worst case would require evacuations and shelter-in-place orders for zones within a few hundred kilometers of Bushehr, which would encompass cities in Gulf Arab monarchies, a lifeblood of the world economy. The people would have to take iodine and could also experience restrictions on food availability, Grossi explained.&nbsp;Grossi called for a diplomatic outcome and reiterated his offer to travel to strike a bargain."Nuclear weapons will not be made in Iran under a foolproof inspection system that the IAEA can assure," he said.

Nuclear facilities must not be targeted says UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi in statement to UNSC

In an address to the United Nations Security Council on Friday (June 20), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief General Rafael Grossi warned that attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities have sharply degraded their safety and posed serious radiological and environmental risks. Grossi confirmed that Israel’s recent strikes have targeted key facilities such as Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan, Arak, and Karaj, prompting global concern. According to Grossi, the Natanz enrichment site suffered extensive damage, including the destruction of electrical infrastructure and serious damage to its underground cascade halls. Though external radiation levels remained normal, Grossi stressed that the internal radiological and chemical contamination, including uranium hexafluoride and uranyl fluoride, posed a significant threat to personnel within the site. Fordow, a critical site for enriching uranium to 60%, has remained undamaged, Grossi stated. Meanwhile, the Esfahan site sustained damage to four facilities. Similar attacks were confirmed at Arak’s Heavy Water Reactor and the Karaj workshop, although no radiological release occurred. Of utmost concern is the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, where a direct hit could result in catastrophic radioactive release, affecting populations across Iran and beyond. Grossi warned that an attack or even a disruption of the plant’s power supply could lead to a core meltdown and long-term environmental consequences. The IAEA Director General called for immediate de-escalation, warning that “armed attacks on nuclear facilities should never occur” and could result in grave consequences within and beyond the state attacked. He urged the Security Council and international community to support the Agency’s role in verifying that Iran’s nuclear materials — including over 400 kg of uranium enriched to 60% — remain accounted for and secure. Reiterating the Agency’s commitment to remain present and operational in Iran despite security constraints, Grossi said, “The IAEA can guarantee, through a watertight inspection regime, that nuclear weapons will not be developed in Iran.” He called for a constructive, professional dialogue with all parties, emphasizing that “nuclear facilities and material must not be shrouded by the fog of war” and reminding the Council that a diplomatic solution is within reach if supported by the necessary political will. The IAEA chief also said that Middle East faces a nuclear disaster if Israel attacks Iran's southern nuclear facility of Bushehr, the UN nuclear watchdog chief warned on Friday. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director Rafael Grossi informed the UN Security Council that he has not yet seen radiation emanating from Israel's week-long aerial campaign on Iran, including strikes on nuclear facilities. But he added that an attack on Bushehr -- the Middle East's first civilian nuclear reactor, which has so far seemed to have been left intact -- would mean the gravest consequences because it holds thousands of kilograms of nuclear material. "Regional countries have come directly to me in the last few hours to communicate their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and perfectly clear -- a direct hit on the Bushehr nuclear power plant would entail a very high release of radioactivity," Grossi said. Grossi cautioned of just as bad effects even if Israel targets the lines powering electricity to Bushehr, as such disabling of power could lead to a meltdown. A worst case would require evacuations and shelter-in-place orders for zones within a few hundred kilometers of Bushehr, which would encompass cities in Gulf Arab monarchies, a lifeblood of the world economy. The people would have to take iodine and could also experience restrictions on food availability, Grossi explained. Grossi called for a diplomatic outcome and reiterated his offer to travel to strike a bargain. "Nuclear weapons will not be made in Iran under a foolproof inspection system that the IAEA can assure," he said.

Rafael Grossi appealed for a diplomatic solution and repeated his willingness to travel to negotiate a deal

'Nuclear facilities must not be targeted’, says UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi in statement to UNSC

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, slammed the United Nations Security Council on Sunday, accusing it of “indifference” over Israel’s attacks on Iran.During a meeting with foreign diplomats that was aired on state TV, Araghchi said the Israeli attack “is being met with indifference at the Security Council”, adding that Western governments have “condemned Iran instead of Israel despite it being the side that was violated”.Araghchi then said that Iran’s attacks on Israel will end when its “aggression stops”.He also claimed that Tehran had evidence to show US forces supported the intense bombardment that Israel launched against the Islamic republic this week.“We have solid proof of the support of the American forces and American bases in the region for the attacks of the Zionist regime military forces,” Araghchi said.&nbsp;<h2>Iran slams IAEA for being ‘silent’ on Israeli strikes, says ‘will limit cooperation’</h2>&nbsp;Earlier, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi had criticised the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for its silence over Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and said that Iran will limit its cooperation with the UN’s nuclear watchdog.&nbsp;“It makes no sense that these peaceful sites come under attack and that the agency remains silent,” said Gharibabadi.&nbsp;“Iran will no longer cooperate with the agency… as it once did,” he added.&nbsp;<h2>Iran’s above-ground enrichment plant at Natanz destroyed: IAEA chief</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the UN Security Council on Friday that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Iran’s Natanz nuclear site has been destroyed.&nbsp;“At present, the Iranian authorities are informing us of attacks on two other facilities, namely the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan,” Grossi told the 15-member council.“At this moment, we do not have enough information beyond indicating that military activity has taken place around these facilities as well.”&nbsp;IAEA also confirmed that Israel struck Iran’s uranium-conversion facility at Isfahan, near Tehran, and caused grave damage to the site.&nbsp;Iran converts uranium into feedstock essential for centrifuges at Isfahan.&nbsp;However, the attack did not take out the primary underground halls, the site for uranium enrichment.

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, also claimed that Tehran had evidence to show that the US forces supported the intense bombardment that Israel launched against the Islamic republic this week.

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, slammed the United Nations Security Council on Sunday, accusing it of “indifference” over Israel’s attacks on Iran. During a meeting with foreign diplomats that was aired on state TV, Araghchi said the Israeli attack “is being met with indifference at the Security Council”, adding that Western governments have “condemned Iran instead of Israel despite it being the side that was violated”. Araghchi then said that Iran’s attacks on Israel will end when its “aggression stops”. He also claimed that Tehran had evidence to show US forces supported the intense bombardment that Israel launched against the Islamic republic this week. “We have solid proof of the support of the American forces and American bases in the region for the attacks of the Zionist regime military forces,” Araghchi said. Iran slams IAEA for being ‘silent’ on Israeli strikes, says ‘will limit cooperation’ Earlier, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi had criticised the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for its silence over Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and said that Iran will limit its cooperation with the UN’s nuclear watchdog. “It makes no sense that these peaceful sites come under attack and that the agency remains silent,” said Gharibabadi. “Iran will no longer cooperate with the agency… as it once did,” he added. Iran’s above-ground enrichment plant at Natanz destroyed: IAEA chief Meanwhile, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the UN Security Council on Friday that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Iran’s Natanz nuclear site has been destroyed. “At present, the Iranian authorities are informing us of attacks on two other facilities, namely the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan,” Grossi told the 15-member council. “At this moment, we do not have enough information beyond indicating that military activity has taken place around these facilities as well.” IAEA also confirmed that Israel struck Iran’s uranium-conversion facility at Isfahan, near Tehran, and caused grave damage to the site. Iran converts uranium into feedstock essential for centrifuges at Isfahan. However, the attack did not take out the primary underground halls, the site for uranium enrichment.

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, also claimed that Tehran had evidence to show that the US forces supported the intense bombardment that Israel launched against the Islamic republic this week.

After slamming IAEA, Iran accuses UN Security Council of ‘indifference’ over Israel attacks

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor criticised China for supporting Pakistan in removing a key terror reference at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). He called out Beijing’s actions for helping shield the Lashkar-e-Taiba-supported ‘Resistance Front’ from being named in a press statement.Tharoor, who is part of an all-party Indian delegation currently visiting Brazil, expressed his concern during a discussion with Brazilian diplomat Ambassador Celso Amorim. He pointed out that India had repeatedly raised the Resistance Front with the UN Sanctions Committee, but China’s support to Pakistan blocked any reference to the group.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/pakistan/-sudden-decrease-in-river-chenab-pakistan-s-faces-water-crisis-as-indus-waters-treaty-remains-in-abeyance-after-pahalgam-terror-attack-1748886326305">'Sudden decrease in river Chenab': Pakistan faces water crisis as Indus Waters Treaty remains in abeyance after Pahalgam terror attack</a>“We have been reporting about RF to UN Sanctions Committee, time after time and when India encouraged our friends on the Security Council to mention the Resistance Front in the press statement that the Security Council issued,” he said.“Pakistan government, I am sorry to say that with the support of your friend in China, took out the name, so there is not even a reference,” Tharoor added.<h2>A pointed dig at both Pakistan and China</h2>Taking a clear swipe at both Islamabad and Beijing, Tharoor said, “We are not on the Security Council, and neither are you. We have to change that situation. Both of us should be on the Council together.”His comments underline the difficulties India faces in addressing cross-border terrorism, particularly when major powers within the UNSC use their influence to shield certain actors.The Indian MPs’ delegation in Brazil was welcomed at the airport in Brasilia by Sandeep Kumar Kujur, Charge d’Affaires of the Indian Embassy.<h2>Tharoor reacts to Colorado terror attack</h2>In a separate post on X, Shashi Tharoor expressed concern over the recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado. “Members of the Indian MPs’ delegation learnt with concern about the terror attack in Colorado and were relieved that there was no loss of life,” he said.

Taking a clear swipe at both Islamabad and Beijing, Tharoor said, “We are not on the Security Council, and neither are you. We have to change that situation. Both of us should be on the Council together.”

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor criticised China for supporting Pakistan in removing a key terror reference at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). He called out Beijing’s actions for helping shield the Lashkar-e-Taiba-supported ‘Resistance Front’ from being named in a press statement. Tharoor, who is part of an all-party Indian delegation currently visiting Brazil, expressed his concern during a discussion with Brazilian diplomat Ambassador Celso Amorim. He pointed out that India had repeatedly raised the Resistance Front with the UN Sanctions Committee, but China’s support to Pakistan blocked any reference to the group. Also read: 'Sudden decrease in river Chenab': Pakistan faces water crisis as Indus Waters Treaty remains in abeyance after Pahalgam terror attack “We have been reporting about RF to UN Sanctions Committee, time after time and when India encouraged our friends on the Security Council to mention the Resistance Front in the press statement that the Security Council issued,” he said. “Pakistan government, I am sorry to say that with the support of your friend in China, took out the name, so there is not even a reference,” Tharoor added. A pointed dig at both Pakistan and China Taking a clear swipe at both Islamabad and Beijing, Tharoor said, “We are not on the Security Council, and neither are you. We have to change that situation. Both of us should be on the Council together.” His comments underline the difficulties India faces in addressing cross-border terrorism, particularly when major powers within the UNSC use their influence to shield certain actors. The Indian MPs’ delegation in Brazil was welcomed at the airport in Brasilia by Sandeep Kumar Kujur, Charge d’Affaires of the Indian Embassy. Tharoor reacts to Colorado terror attack In a separate post on X, Shashi Tharoor expressed concern over the recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado. “Members of the Indian MPs’ delegation learnt with concern about the terror attack in Colorado and were relieved that there was no loss of life,” he said.

Taking a clear swipe at both Islamabad and Beijing, Tharoor said, “We are not on the Security Council, and neither are you. We have to change that situation. Both of us should be on the Council together.”

'Support of your friend in China...': Shashi Tharoor slams Pakistan, China for shielding LeT-backed terror group ‘Resistance Front’ at UNSC

India on Friday (May 23) called out Pakistan at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) for its "grossly hypocritical behaviour".Slamming Pakistan for its attacks on civilians during the four-day military confrontation, India noted that Islamabad makes no distinction between terrorists and civilians and thus has zero credentials to speak about protecting civilians.<h2>Decades of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism</h2>During an open debate on "Addressing emerging threats, ensuring safety of civilians, humanitarian and UN personnel, journalists and media professionals and enhancing accountability mechanisms" under the agenda item "Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict", Pakistani Ambassador at the UN Asim Iftikhar Ahmad brought up the Kashmir issue and the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan.In response, India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Parvathaneni Harish, called out Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism that for decades has made civilians a target."India has experienced decades of Pakistani-sponsored terrorist attacks across the border. This ranges from the horrific attack on 26/11 Mumbai attack to the barbaric mass murder of innocent tourists in Pahalgam in April 2025. The victims of Pakistani terrorism have been predominantly civilians since its objective has been to attack our prosperity, progress and our morale," he said.Watch the video here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IndiaAtUN?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IndiaAtUN</a> Statement by PR <a href="https://twitter.com/AmbHarishP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AmbHarishP</a> at the <a href="https://twitter.com/UN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@UN</a> Security Council Open Debate on: Addressing emerging threats, ensuring safety of civilians, humanitarian and UN Personnel, journalists and media professionals and enhancing accountability mechanisms. <a href="https://twitter.com/MEAIndia?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MEAIndia</a> <a href="https://t.co/VOEZ9eMQjU">pic.twitter.com/VOEZ9eMQjU</a>&mdash; India at UN, NY (@IndiaUNNewYork) <a href="https://twitter.com/IndiaUNNewYork/status/1925946183660261760?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Pakistani officials attended terrorist funerals</h2>Ambassador Harish then slammed Pakistani high-ups for attending the funerals of some terrorists killed by India during "Operation Sindoor""We just recently saw senior government, police, and military officials pay respects at the funeral of noted terrorists targeted by Operation Sindoor. A nation that makes no distinction between terrorists and civilians has no credentials to speak about protecting civilians," he said.Slamming Pakistani claims, he added that Islamabad deliberately targeted and shelled border villages in India and killed over 20 and injured over 80 civilians during the conflict and its repeated LoC ceasefire violations. He said that Pakistan targeted schools, medical facilities, gurudwaras and temples."To preach at this body after such behaviour is grossly hypocritical. Let us be clear...Protection of civilians should not serve as an argument for protection of UN-designated terrorists," he noted before urging the international community to "come together on zero tolerance for terrorism and calling out those who sponsor and defend it".

Slamming Pakistan for its attacks on civilians during the four-day military confrontation, India noted that Islamabad makes no distinction between terrorists and civilians and thus has zero credentials to speak about protecting civilians.

India on Friday (May 23) called out Pakistan at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) for its "grossly hypocritical behaviour". Slamming Pakistan for its attacks on civilians during the four-day military confrontation, India noted that Islamabad makes no distinction between terrorists and civilians and thus has zero credentials to speak about protecting civilians. Decades of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism During an open debate on "Addressing emerging threats, ensuring safety of civilians, humanitarian and UN personnel, journalists and media professionals and enhancing accountability mechanisms" under the agenda item "Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict", Pakistani Ambassador at the UN Asim Iftikhar Ahmad brought up the Kashmir issue and the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan. In response, India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Parvathaneni Harish, called out Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism that for decades has made civilians a target. "India has experienced decades of Pakistani-sponsored terrorist attacks across the border. This ranges from the horrific attack on 26/11 Mumbai attack to the barbaric mass murder of innocent tourists in Pahalgam in April 2025. The victims of Pakistani terrorism have been predominantly civilians since its objective has been to attack our prosperity, progress and our morale," he said. Watch the video here:

Slamming Pakistan for its attacks on civilians during the four-day military confrontation, India noted that Islamabad makes no distinction between terrorists and civilians and thus has zero credentials to speak about protecting civilians.

India slams 'grossly hypocritical' Pakistan at UNSC, points out 'army officials attended terrorists' funeral'

India has strongly criticised Pakistan at the United Nations Security Council, pointing to a long history of terror attacks allegedly supported by Islamabad. The comments came from India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, during an open debate on protecting civilians during armed conflicts.Referring to recent and past incidents, Harish said, “India has experienced decades of Pakistani-sponsored terrorist attacks across our borders. This has ranged from the horrific 26/11 attack on the city of Mumbai to the barbaric mass murder of innocent tourists in Pahalgam in April 2025.”<h2>UN platform sees heated India-Pakistan exchange</h2>The Indian envoy was responding to Pakistan’s earlier remarks during the debate, which centred around the safety of civilians, humanitarian workers, and media personnel in conflict zones.“I am constrained to respond to the baseless allegations of the representative of Pakistan on a number of issues,” Harish noted during the session. He went on to say that Pakistan’s participation in discussions about civilian protection was “an affront to the international community”, given its alleged record of supporting violence that targets civilians.<h2>Tensions rose after Pahalgam terror attack</h2>Relations between the two countries worsened significantly following a terror attack in Pahalgam last month, which resulted in the deaths of 26 people, many of whom were tourists.India responded by conducting targeted strikes on what it identified as terror camps located in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. This was followed by Pakistani attempts to attack Indian military bases over the next three days.According to Indian officials, these attempts were met with a firm response. The situation de-escalated after both countries’ military operations directors held discussions and agreed to halt further military action on May 10.

The Indian envoy was responding to Pakistan’s earlier remarks during the debate, which centred around the safety of civilians, humanitarian workers, and media personnel in conflict zones.

India has strongly criticised Pakistan at the United Nations Security Council, pointing to a long history of terror attacks allegedly supported by Islamabad. The comments came from India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, during an open debate on protecting civilians during armed conflicts. Referring to recent and past incidents, Harish said, “India has experienced decades of Pakistani-sponsored terrorist attacks across our borders. This has ranged from the horrific 26/11 attack on the city of Mumbai to the barbaric mass murder of innocent tourists in Pahalgam in April 2025.” UN platform sees heated India-Pakistan exchange The Indian envoy was responding to Pakistan’s earlier remarks during the debate, which centred around the safety of civilians, humanitarian workers, and media personnel in conflict zones. “I am constrained to respond to the baseless allegations of the representative of Pakistan on a number of issues,” Harish noted during the session. He went on to say that Pakistan’s participation in discussions about civilian protection was “an affront to the international community”, given its alleged record of supporting violence that targets civilians. Tensions rose after Pahalgam terror attack Relations between the two countries worsened significantly following a terror attack in Pahalgam last month, which resulted in the deaths of 26 people, many of whom were tourists. India responded by conducting targeted strikes on what it identified as terror camps located in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. This was followed by Pakistani attempts to attack Indian military bases over the next three days. According to Indian officials, these attempts were met with a firm response. The situation de-escalated after both countries’ military operations directors held discussions and agreed to halt further military action on May 10.

The Indian envoy was responding to Pakistan’s earlier remarks during the debate, which centred around the safety of civilians, humanitarian workers, and media personnel in conflict zones.

From 'horrific 26/11' to 'barbaric mass murder' in Pahalgam: India blasts Pakistan at UNSC over decades of terror attack

India is moving the UNSC to list TRF as a terror outfit, cracking down on Pakistan's support for the group. A team will be sent to the UNSC with proof of Pakistan's terror links. Watch this for report for more details!

India-Pakistan tensions: India ramps up bid to declare TRF a terror group

India-Pakistan tensions: India to move UNSC 1267 to declare TRF a terror group

UN Security Council members raised tough questions for Pakistan at its informal session today. They refused to accept the “false flag” narrative and asked whether LeT was likely to be involved. There was broad condemnation of the terrorist attack and recognition of the need for accountability. Some members specifically brought up targeting of tourists on the basis of their religious faith. Many members expressed concern that Pakistan’s missile tests and nuclear rhetoric were escalatory factors. Pakistan’s efforts to internationalise the situation also failed. They were advised to sort out the issues bilaterally with India: Sources on the UNSC closed-door session on Kashmir.

Pahalgam attack: UNSC members refuse to accept Pak's 'false flag' narrative: Sources

New Delhi: India&rsquo;s former ambassador to the United Nations, Syed Akbaruddin, has said no significant outcome is expected from the closed-door meeting at the United Nations Security Council requested by Pakistan. Speaking to WION, he said, &ldquo;No significant outcome is likely from such informal closed consultations.&rdquo;
It is important to know that Akbaruddin was the Indian ambassador to the UN when the last such closed-door meeting happened in 2019. The meeting happened at the request of Pakistan back then also, with China taking the initiative. The meeting was requested in the aftermath of the special status for the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Pakistan&rsquo;s initiative is a public diplomacy effort aimed at shaping perceptions rather than advancing negotiations,&rdquo; the former ambassador explained on today&rsquo;s meeting.
Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pakistan-a-failed-state-gen-munirs-remarks-nonsensical-oppn-leader-asaduddin-owaisi-9032050" rel="noopener" target="_blank">&lsquo;Pakistan a failed state, Gen Munir&rsquo;s remarks nonsensical&rsquo;: Oppn leader Asaduddin Owaisi</a>
Pakistan is currently a non-permanent member of the UNSC, a tenure that started from 1st January. The Pakistani foreign ministry, in a statement, said that the country will &ldquo;formally apprise the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) of the latest developments in South Asia&rdquo;, and also raise the issue of the Indus Waters Treaty being put into &ldquo;abeyance&rdquo; by the Indian side.&nbsp;
The closed meeting takes place under the header &ldquo;Threats to international peace and security&rdquo; at 1.30 am IST. Ideally, issues can be raised at the consultative meetings or under &ldquo;Any other business&rdquo;.&nbsp;
Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/what-you-all-desire-will-happen-assures-defence-minister-rajnath-singh-on-pahalgam-retaliation-9032695" rel="noopener" target="_blank">&lsquo;What you all desire will happen,&rsquo; assures defence minister Rajnath Singh on Pahalgam retaliation</a>
In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, India&rsquo;s External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar had spoken to 9 out of 10 non-permanent members of UNSC and 4 of the 5 permanent members of the top UN body, briefing Delhi&rsquo;s position on the issue of terrorism supported by Pakistan. These countries are France, Russia, US, UK, Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Panama, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, and Somalia.&nbsp;
Last week, Greece, which holds the rotational presidency of the UN Security Council for the month of May, condemned the terror attack but said a meeting can happen. &ldquo;If a request comes for meeting..it might happen sooner rather than later,&rdquo; said Greece&rsquo;s UN Envoy Evangelos Sekeris.
&nbsp;

World | India News | Pakistan: In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, India’s External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar had spoken to 9 out of 10 non-permanent members of the UNSC and 4 of the 5 permanent members of the top UN body.

New Delhi: India’s former ambassador to the United Nations, Syed Akbaruddin, has said no significant outcome is expected from the closed-door meeting at the United Nations Security Council requested by Pakistan. Speaking to WION, he said, “No significant outcome is likely from such informal closed consultations.” It is important to know that Akbaruddin was the Indian ambassador to the UN when the last such closed-door meeting happened in 2019. The meeting happened at the request of Pakistan back then also, with China taking the initiative. The meeting was requested in the aftermath of the special status for the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. “Pakistan’s initiative is a public diplomacy effort aimed at shaping perceptions rather than advancing negotiations,” the former ambassador explained on today’s meeting. Also Read | ‘Pakistan a failed state, Gen Munir’s remarks nonsensical’: Oppn leader Asaduddin Owaisi Pakistan is currently a non-permanent member of the UNSC, a tenure that started from 1st January. The Pakistani foreign ministry, in a statement, said that the country will “formally apprise the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) of the latest developments in South Asia”, and also raise the issue of the Indus Waters Treaty being put into “abeyance” by the Indian side. The closed meeting takes place under the header “Threats to international peace and security” at 1.30 am IST. Ideally, issues can be raised at the consultative meetings or under “Any other business”. Also Read | ‘What you all desire will happen,’ assures defence minister Rajnath Singh on Pahalgam retaliation In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, India’s External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar had spoken to 9 out of 10 non-permanent members of UNSC and 4 of the 5 permanent members of the top UN body, briefing Delhi’s position on the issue of terrorism supported by Pakistan. These countries are France, Russia, US, UK, Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Panama, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, and Somalia. Last week, Greece, which holds the rotational presidency of the UN Security Council for the month of May, condemned the terror attack but said a meeting can happen. “If a request comes for meeting..it might happen sooner rather than later,” said Greece’s UN Envoy Evangelos Sekeris.

‘No significant outcome...,’ India’s former envoy to UN Syed Akbaruddin on UNSC closed-door meet

The UN Security Council will be holding close consultations today on the situation between India and Pakistan, this comes after Islamabad, a current non-permanent member, sought an emergency meeting. Meanwhile, Pakistan continues to violate ceasefire, conducting firing across sectors along the Line of Control for the 11th day.

UN Security Council to hold ‘closed consultations’ on India-Pak tension over Pahalgam attack today

The United Nations General Assembly on Monday adopted two resolutions calling for an end to the war while rejecting a US draft that never mentioned Moscow's aggression. Watch this report for more details!

Two UN resolutions adopted on Ukraine crisis, US sides with Russia

Parvathaneni Harish, <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-reiterates-call-for-un-security-council-reform-pushes-for-permanent-seat-slams-non-progressive-status-quo-8734364">India's permanent representative</a> to the United Nations, condemned Pakistan on Tuesday (Feb 18) at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) over terrorism and Islamabad's misinformation campaigns regarding Kashmir.
Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish slammed Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar for raking Kashmir (J&amp;K) at the UNSC and reaffirmed that Jammu and Kashmir, is and will always be, an integral part of India. He also noted that it is Pakistan that is in illegal occupation of parts of J&amp;K.
Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-to-sign-new-executive-orders-as-his-first-joint-interview-with-elon-musk-airs-8733996" rel="noopener" target="_blank">US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's first joint interview to air today - Know all details inside</a>
While speaking during a UN Security Council Open Debate on Practicing Multilateralism, Reforming and Improving Global Governance, Harish said, "Pakistan&rsquo;s campaigns of misinformation and disinformation, of lies and falsehoods, do not change facts on the ground."&nbsp;
Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/about-ukraine-again-and-without-ukraine-zelensky-slams-talks-between-us-russia-in-riyadh-8733491" rel="noopener" target="_blank">&lsquo;Mistakes must be avoided&rsquo;: Zelensky slams US, Russia talks in Riyadh, postpones his Saudi trip</a>
Mentioning the recent Assemble Election in J&amp;K, he said, "The people of Jammu and Kashmir have only last year taken part in a successful election and have voted in large numbers to choose their government. The choice of the people of Jammu &amp; Kashmir was loud and clear. Democracy in Jammu and Kashmir is vibrant and strong, unlike in Pakistan."&nbsp;
Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/no-one-is-being-sidelined-us-says-end-to-ukraine-conflict-must-be-acceptable-to-all-including-kyiv-europe-8733231" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Key takeaways from US-Russia talks in Saudi Arabia as two nations discuss Ukraine war in its absence</a>
<h2>'Pakistan global epicentre of terrorism'</h2>
The ambassador said, "Pakistan is a global epicentre of terrorism harbouring more than 20 UN-listed terrorist entities and providing state support to cross-border terrorism."&nbsp;
He added that it is a "supreme irony" when Pakistan pats itself on the back as being at the forefront of the fight against terrorism.&nbsp;
Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-ukraine-war-live-updates-us-and-russian-high-ranked-officials-meet-in-riyadh-over-ukraine-war-8731772" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Talks conclude in Saudi Arabia HIGHLIGHTS: Russia says there is &lsquo;mutual desire&rsquo; to start Ukraine peace talks</a>&nbsp;
"India has been a victim of acts of terror perpetrated by this country through terror groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed and Harkat Ul Mujahidin, among dozens of others," he added.&nbsp;
(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

India News | During a UNSC debate, Harish criticises Pakistan's misinformation campaigns, emphasising they do not alter the reality of Kashmir being a part of India.

Parvathaneni Harish, India's permanent representative to the United Nations, condemned Pakistan on Tuesday (Feb 18) at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) over terrorism and Islamabad's misinformation campaigns regarding Kashmir. Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish slammed Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar for raking Kashmir (J&K) at the UNSC and reaffirmed that Jammu and Kashmir, is and will always be, an integral part of India. He also noted that it is Pakistan that is in illegal occupation of parts of J&K. Also read: US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's first joint interview to air today - Know all details inside While speaking during a UN Security Council Open Debate on Practicing Multilateralism, Reforming and Improving Global Governance, Harish said, "Pakistan’s campaigns of misinformation and disinformation, of lies and falsehoods, do not change facts on the ground." Also read: ‘Mistakes must be avoided’: Zelensky slams US, Russia talks in Riyadh, postpones his Saudi trip Mentioning the recent Assemble Election in J&K, he said, "The people of Jammu and Kashmir have only last year taken part in a successful election and have voted in large numbers to choose their government. The choice of the people of Jammu & Kashmir was loud and clear. Democracy in Jammu and Kashmir is vibrant and strong, unlike in Pakistan." Also read: Key takeaways from US-Russia talks in Saudi Arabia as two nations discuss Ukraine war in its absence 'Pakistan global epicentre of terrorism' The ambassador said, "Pakistan is a global epicentre of terrorism harbouring more than 20 UN-listed terrorist entities and providing state support to cross-border terrorism." He added that it is a "supreme irony" when Pakistan pats itself on the back as being at the forefront of the fight against terrorism. Also read: Talks conclude in Saudi Arabia HIGHLIGHTS: Russia says there is ‘mutual desire’ to start Ukraine peace talks "India has been a victim of acts of terror perpetrated by this country through terror groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed and Harkat Ul Mujahidin, among dozens of others," he added. (With inputs from agencies)

India at UNSC slams Pakistan's campaigns of 'misinformation' over Kashmir

India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, on Tuesday (Feb 18) reiterated the urgent need for reforms in the UN Security Council.
Emphasising India's claim to a permanent seat at the UNSC, the ambassador said, "Those opposed to expansion of permanent category are status quoists with a narrow focus."
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/north-korea-significantly-benefiting-from-its-troops-fighting-in-russia-war-us-at-unsc-8603767">North Korea 'significantly benefiting' from its troops fighting in Russia war: US at UNSC</a>
<h2>Indian envoy criticises UN's 'non-progressive' approach</h2>
"At a time when the world [is] increasingly expressing concerns about the ability of the United Nations to deliver effectively on pressing global issues, reforms are not a choice any more, but an imperative," said India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations while calling for reforms.
Slamming the UN's "non-progressive" approach, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said, "This can no longer be accepted".
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-defends-21-million-doge-cut-have-lot-of-respect-for-india-but-8734405">Trump defends $21 million DOGE cut; 'Have lot of respect for India, but...'</a>
"India is firmly committed to the cause of reforms," he added.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m7baqgzi-2f9dqcs6-ft2tsbex">
Indian envoy to UN <a href="https://twitter.com/AmbHarishP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AmbHarishP</a> at UNSC "Those opposed to expansion of permanent category are status quoists with a narrow focus. Clearly, their approach is non-progressive in nature. This can no longer be accepted". "India is firmly committed to the cause of reforms" <a href="https://t.co/KdeMrr1OcI">pic.twitter.com/KdeMrr1OcI</a>
&mdash; Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) <a href="https://twitter.com/sidhant/status/1891999328341725271?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 18, 2025</a></blockquote>
Ambassador Harish highlighted "seven specific points" backing India's claim to a permanent seat in the UNSC.
"India has been consistent, categorical and major voice with regard to underscoring the need for reforms," he noted.
The original structures and frameworks of the UN "represent a different period in history," he said adding, "Our world has transformed, and the UN needs to change with the times. It has to be reflective of the current global order rather than 1945."&nbsp;&nbsp;
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-hamas-war-us-vetoes-unsc-resolution-on-ceasefire-777908">Israel-Hamas war: US vetoes UNSC resolution on ceasefire</a>
The Indian envoy also noted that the "historical injustices" wrought upon Africa need to be addressed and voiced India's support towards that end.
Noting Africa's dearth of representation in UNSC permanent membership, he said: "The global south cannot continue to be shortchanged."
"India and major players in other parts of the world deserve their due representation in the structures of the United Nations."
"As regards security council, this translates to permanent category membership," he said.
(With inputs from agencies)

World | India News | India calls for urgent UN Security Council reforms, pushing for a permanent seat, with a focus on addressing the non-progressive stance of the opposition.

India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, on Tuesday (Feb 18) reiterated the urgent need for reforms in the UN Security Council. Emphasising India's claim to a permanent seat at the UNSC, the ambassador said, "Those opposed to expansion of permanent category are status quoists with a narrow focus." Also read | North Korea 'significantly benefiting' from its troops fighting in Russia war: US at UNSC Indian envoy criticises UN's 'non-progressive' approach "At a time when the world [is] increasingly expressing concerns about the ability of the United Nations to deliver effectively on pressing global issues, reforms are not a choice any more, but an imperative," said India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations while calling for reforms. Slamming the UN's "non-progressive" approach, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said, "This can no longer be accepted". Also read | Trump defends $21 million DOGE cut; 'Have lot of respect for India, but...' "India is firmly committed to the cause of reforms," he added. Indian envoy to UN @AmbHarishP at UNSC "Those opposed to expansion of permanent category are status quoists with a narrow focus. Clearly, their approach is non-progressive in nature. This can no longer be accepted". "India is firmly committed to the cause of reforms" pic.twitter.com/KdeMrr1OcI — Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) February 18, 2025 Ambassador Harish highlighted "seven specific points" backing India's claim to a permanent seat in the UNSC. "India has been consistent, categorical and major voice with regard to underscoring the need for reforms," he noted. The original structures and frameworks of the UN "represent a different period in history," he said adding, "Our world has transformed, and the UN needs to change with the times. It has to be reflective of the current global order rather than 1945." Also read | Israel-Hamas war: US vetoes UNSC resolution on ceasefire The Indian envoy also noted that the "historical injustices" wrought upon Africa need to be addressed and voiced India's support towards that end. Noting Africa's dearth of representation in UNSC permanent membership, he said: "The global south cannot continue to be shortchanged." "India and major players in other parts of the world deserve their due representation in the structures of the United Nations." "As regards security council, this translates to permanent category membership," he said. (With inputs from agencies)

India reiterates call for UNSC reform, pushes for permanent seat, slams 'non-progressive' status quo

The United States has vetoed a resolution at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) demanding an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Watch this report for more details!

US Vetoes UN Resolution Demanding Immediate End to Gaza War

A majority of the 15-member UN Security Council on Tuesday called on North Korea to give up its ballistic missile programme and condemned its launch of an intercontinental missile last month.

"This launch, in addition to the more than 100 ballistic missile launches since 2022 to date, is a clear violation of multiple UN Security Council resolutions, jeopardizes international peace and security and threatens to undermine the global nonproliferation regime," the countries said in a joint statement read out by the deputy US ambassador, Robert Wood.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/german-police-arrest-eight-far-right-members-of-paramilitary-group-773614">German police arrest eight far-right members of paramilitary group</a>

Besides the United States, the statement was signed by France, Japan, Ecuador, Malta, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, Switzerland and Britain. They were also joined by Denmark, Greece and Panama, which will become non-permanent members of the council in January.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/former-trump-advisor-john-bolton-on-who-will-win-us-election-kamala-harris-vs-donald-trump-773611/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

According to the statement, in response to the ICBM launch on October 30, the United States asked the council to adopt a text declaring North Korea to be in violation of UN resolutions. This would need to be approved by all 15 members.

"However, two council members refused to join a united denunciation," the statement said.

The text does not name the two countries, but the United States regularly accuses Russia and China of protecting North Korea at the United Nations.

"We call on the DPRK to return to negotiations, comply with its obligations under numerous UN Security Council resolutions and abandon its weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs," the joint statement said.

It made no mention of a salvo of short range ballistic missiles that North Korea fired, according to the South Korean military, just ahead of the US presidential election on Tuesday.

North Korea has been under UN sanctions since 2006 because of its weapons programmes and they were toughened three times in 2017.

But since then, the council has failed to achieve a common position on North Korea.

In May 2022, China and Russia vetoed a draft resolution that would have slapped new sanctions on North Korea.

Disclaimer:&nbsp;This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

A majority of the 15-member UN Security Council on Tuesday called on North Korea to give up its ballistic missile programme and condemned its launch of an intercontinental missile last month.

A majority of the 15-member UN Security Council on Tuesday called on North Korea to give up its ballistic missile programme and condemned its launch of an intercontinental missile last month. "This launch, in addition to the more than 100 ballistic missile launches since 2022 to date, is a clear violation of multiple UN Security Council resolutions, jeopardizes international peace and security and threatens to undermine the global nonproliferation regime," the countries said in a joint statement read out by the deputy US ambassador, Robert Wood. Also Read: German police arrest eight far-right members of paramilitary group Besides the United States, the statement was signed by France, Japan, Ecuador, Malta, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, Switzerland and Britain. They were also joined by Denmark, Greece and Panama, which will become non-permanent members of the council in January. × According to the statement, in response to the ICBM launch on October 30, the United States asked the council to adopt a text declaring North Korea to be in violation of UN resolutions. This would need to be approved by all 15 members. "However, two council members refused to join a united denunciation," the statement said. The text does not name the two countries, but the United States regularly accuses Russia and China of protecting North Korea at the United Nations. "We call on the DPRK to return to negotiations, comply with its obligations under numerous UN Security Council resolutions and abandon its weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs," the joint statement said. It made no mention of a salvo of short range ballistic missiles that North Korea fired, according to the South Korean military, just ahead of the US presidential election on Tuesday. North Korea has been under UN sanctions since 2006 because of its weapons programmes and they were toughened three times in 2017. But since then, the council has failed to achieve a common position on North Korea. In May 2022, China and Russia vetoed a draft resolution that would have slapped new sanctions on North Korea. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

United Nations Security Council asks North Korea to give up missiles and other weapons

UN chief Antonio Guterres called Wednesday for an end to the "sickening cycle of escalation" in the Middle East, while specifically condemning Iran over its latest missile attack after facing harsh criticism from Israel.

The secretary-general was speaking at an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, called after Iran on Tuesday launched a massive missile barrage at Israel, which has ramped up its offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

"It is high time to stop the sickening cycle of escalation after escalation that is leading the people of the Middle East straight over the cliff," the UN chief said.&nbsp;

"This deadly cycle of tit-for-tat violence must stop."

Israel's pledge to respond to the Iranian missile attack has raised fears of a spiralling region-wide war, sending diplomats scrambling for options to de-escalate the situation.

Iran in turn said it would launch an even bigger attack if Israel makes good on its pledge.

Israel shifted its focus last month from the war in Gaza, which was sparked by the October 7 attacks by Iran-backed Hamas, to securing its northern border with Lebanon.

As the Security Council met, Israeli forces were battling Hezbollah militants in Lebanon, following "targeted ground raids" across the border by Israel on Tuesday.

More than 1,000 people have died since last week, in fighting that has included Israeli strikes on Beirut and its southern suburbs.

Earlier Wednesday, Israel had declared Guterres "persona non grata" for failing to specifically condemn Iran's missile attack when he condemned on Tuesday the "broadening conflict in the Middle East."

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwif_rufp_CIAxUmbfUHHehuOtoQxfQBKAB6BAgHEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/west-asia-crisis-shahab-3-fattah-2-missiles-that-iran-fired-at-israel-in-oct-1-attacks-763892" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/world/west-asia-crisis-shahab-3-fattah-2-missiles-that-iran-fired-at-israel-in-oct-1-attacks-763892&amp;ved=2ahUKEwif_rufp_CIAxUmbfUHHehuOtoQxfQBKAB6BAgHEAE">West Asia crisis: Shahab-3, Fattah-2 among missiles that Iran fired at Israel in Oct 1 attacks</a>

"Anyone who cannot unequivocally condemn Iran's heinous attack on Israel does not deserve to step foot on Israeli soil," said Foreign Minister Israel Katz in a statement.

Guterres addressed the diplomatic dust-up at the Security Council, saying "as should have been obvious yesterday in the context of the condemnation I expressed, I again strongly condemn yesterday's massive missile attack by Iran on Israel."

The UN chief also reiterated his call for a ceasefire.

"Since last October, Israel has conducted in Gaza the most deadly and destructive military campaign in my years as secretary-general," he said.&nbsp;

"Simultaneously armed Palestinian groups have also used violence. Hamas has continued to launch rockets," he said, adding Iran's missile attack did "nothing to support the cause of the Palestinian people or reduce their suffering."

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience. 
&nbsp;

UN chief Antonio Guterres called Wednesday for an end to the "sickening cycle of escalation" in the Middle East, while specifically condemning Iran over its latest missile attack after facing harsh criticism from Israel.

UN chief Antonio Guterres called Wednesday for an end to the "sickening cycle of escalation" in the Middle East, while specifically condemning Iran over its latest missile attack after facing harsh criticism from Israel. The secretary-general was speaking at an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, called after Iran on Tuesday launched a massive missile barrage at Israel, which has ramped up its offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon. "It is high time to stop the sickening cycle of escalation after escalation that is leading the people of the Middle East straight over the cliff," the UN chief said. "This deadly cycle of tit-for-tat violence must stop." Israel's pledge to respond to the Iranian missile attack has raised fears of a spiralling region-wide war, sending diplomats scrambling for options to de-escalate the situation. Iran in turn said it would launch an even bigger attack if Israel makes good on its pledge. Israel shifted its focus last month from the war in Gaza, which was sparked by the October 7 attacks by Iran-backed Hamas, to securing its northern border with Lebanon. As the Security Council met, Israeli forces were battling Hezbollah militants in Lebanon, following "targeted ground raids" across the border by Israel on Tuesday. More than 1,000 people have died since last week, in fighting that has included Israeli strikes on Beirut and its southern suburbs. Earlier Wednesday, Israel had declared Guterres "persona non grata" for failing to specifically condemn Iran's missile attack when he condemned on Tuesday the "broadening conflict in the Middle East." Also read: West Asia crisis: Shahab-3, Fattah-2 among missiles that Iran fired at Israel in Oct 1 attacks "Anyone who cannot unequivocally condemn Iran's heinous attack on Israel does not deserve to step foot on Israeli soil," said Foreign Minister Israel Katz in a statement. Guterres addressed the diplomatic dust-up at the Security Council, saying "as should have been obvious yesterday in the context of the condemnation I expressed, I again strongly condemn yesterday's massive missile attack by Iran on Israel." The UN chief also reiterated his call for a ceasefire. "Since last October, Israel has conducted in Gaza the most deadly and destructive military campaign in my years as secretary-general," he said. "Simultaneously armed Palestinian groups have also used violence. Hamas has continued to launch rockets," he said, adding Iran's missile attack did "nothing to support the cause of the Palestinian people or reduce their suffering." Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

'Deadly cycle of violence must stop': UNSC convenes emergency meeting over West Asia crisis

The United Kingdom’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer reaffirmed its support for a permanent seat for India at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Watch in for more details!

UK, France Reaffirm Support for India's Bid for Permanent Seat at UNSC

The United Nations Security Council in 2006 passed Resolution 1701 to end a month-long war between Israel and Hezbollah and to improve security along the Israel-Lebanon border. WION explains all you need to know about the resolution in this report.

What Is the 2006 UN Resolution That Could Help Resolve The Israel-Hezbollah Conflict?

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war. Starmer emphasized the urgent need to halt the violence and address the humanitarian crisis in the region.

UK PM Keir Starmer calls for expansion of United Nation Security Council

Requested by France, the UN Security Council on Wednesday convened an emergency meeting on Lebanon, the second meeting on the country's deteriorating situation in less than a week, with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres saying that "hell is breaking loose in Lebanon."

<meta charset="utf-8" />

In his remarks, Guterres urged the Security Council "to work in lock-step" to end the escalating violence between Israeli forces and Hezbollah militants across the Blue Line, a buffer zone in southern Lebanon.

Hezbollah and Israel must pull back from the brink of a potentially catastrophic regional war, he insisted, adding that there was now massive civilian displacement from southern and eastern Lebanon towards the Lebanese capital of Beirut, while the Israelis have endured repeated attacks from Hezbollah with more than 8,300 rockets, drones, and increasingly high-caliber missile attacks on military targets and residential areas.

With an appeal for both sides to respect Lebanese sovereignty, Guterres said that Lebanon "must have full control of its weapons" throughout the country. "We support all efforts to strengthen the Lebanese Armed Forces," he added.

"We say it very clearly and honestly: what we have been witnessing over the past year in Gaza and what we are witnessing now in Lebanon is likely to expand to other areas in the region if the international community does not shoulder its responsibility to put an end to the machine of death and destruction," Badr Ahmed Mohamed Abdelatty, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Emigration and Egyptian Expatriates of Egypt, told the meeting.

"They are spreading terror and fear among Lebanese citizens ... We cannot bear to lose another generation because of the war," said Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati.

"The ongoing aggression against Lebanon is fuelled by the failure of the international community, and in particular by the UN Security Council, to hold Israel accountable for war crimes and genocide in Gaza," said Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, Iranian foreign minister, Xinhua news agency reported.

France on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for a 21-day ceasefire in Lebanon in UN diplomacy with the United States as the death toll mounted in deadly strikes by Israel. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said that the two Western powers were proposing a "temporary ceasefire" of 21 days "to allow for negotiations."

The Arab League Council has at the level of foreign ministers warned of the repercussions of escalating "the Israeli aggression" against Lebanon in light of recent developments, which could lead to the outbreak of a large-scale regional war and threaten the security and stability of the entire region.

Israel said on Wednesday it was readying troops for a potential ground incursion into Lebanon, telling soldiers to prepare to "enter enemy territory" as it called up more reservists and sent world leaders scrambling to prevent a full-scale war with Hezbollah militants. "We are preparing the process of a manoeuvre," Israeli Military Chief Herzi Halevi told troops at an exercise along the northern border.

Israeli warplanes resumed intensive airstrikes on eastern and southern Lebanon on Wednesday evening, carrying out about 70 raids on the areas of Baalbek, Hermel, and Western Bekaa in eastern Lebanon.

On Monday and Tuesday, Israel conducted its most extensive attacks on Lebanon since 2006, resulting in more than 550 deaths and over 1,800 injuries across the country. Lebanese Environment Minister Nasser Yassin said Israel's bombardment has displaced over 150,000 residents over the past 72 hours.

The sharp escalation has raised concerns about a potential full-scale conflict between Israel and Lebanon, with fears that other regional powers could also be sucked in.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for&nbsp;WION&nbsp;audience.

Requested by France, the UN Security Council on Wednesday convened an emergency meeting on Lebanon, the second meeting on the country's deteriorating situation in less than a week, with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres saying that "hell is breaking loose in Lebanon.

Requested by France, the UN Security Council on Wednesday convened an emergency meeting on Lebanon, the second meeting on the country's deteriorating situation in less than a week, with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres saying that "hell is breaking loose in Lebanon." In his remarks, Guterres urged the Security Council "to work in lock-step" to end the escalating violence between Israeli forces and Hezbollah militants across the Blue Line, a buffer zone in southern Lebanon. Hezbollah and Israel must pull back from the brink of a potentially catastrophic regional war, he insisted, adding that there was now massive civilian displacement from southern and eastern Lebanon towards the Lebanese capital of Beirut, while the Israelis have endured repeated attacks from Hezbollah with more than 8,300 rockets, drones, and increasingly high-caliber missile attacks on military targets and residential areas. With an appeal for both sides to respect Lebanese sovereignty, Guterres said that Lebanon "must have full control of its weapons" throughout the country. "We support all efforts to strengthen the Lebanese Armed Forces," he added. "We say it very clearly and honestly: what we have been witnessing over the past year in Gaza and what we are witnessing now in Lebanon is likely to expand to other areas in the region if the international community does not shoulder its responsibility to put an end to the machine of death and destruction," Badr Ahmed Mohamed Abdelatty, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Emigration and Egyptian Expatriates of Egypt, told the meeting. "They are spreading terror and fear among Lebanese citizens ... We cannot bear to lose another generation because of the war," said Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati. "The ongoing aggression against Lebanon is fuelled by the failure of the international community, and in particular by the UN Security Council, to hold Israel accountable for war crimes and genocide in Gaza," said Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, Iranian foreign minister, Xinhua news agency reported. France on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for a 21-day ceasefire in Lebanon in UN diplomacy with the United States as the death toll mounted in deadly strikes by Israel. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said that the two Western powers were proposing a "temporary ceasefire" of 21 days "to allow for negotiations." The Arab League Council has at the level of foreign ministers warned of the repercussions of escalating "the Israeli aggression" against Lebanon in light of recent developments, which could lead to the outbreak of a large-scale regional war and threaten the security and stability of the entire region. Israel said on Wednesday it was readying troops for a potential ground incursion into Lebanon, telling soldiers to prepare to "enter enemy territory" as it called up more reservists and sent world leaders scrambling to prevent a full-scale war with Hezbollah militants. "We are preparing the process of a manoeuvre," Israeli Military Chief Herzi Halevi told troops at an exercise along the northern border. Israeli warplanes resumed intensive airstrikes on eastern and southern Lebanon on Wednesday evening, carrying out about 70 raids on the areas of Baalbek, Hermel, and Western Bekaa in eastern Lebanon. On Monday and Tuesday, Israel conducted its most extensive attacks on Lebanon since 2006, resulting in more than 550 deaths and over 1,800 injuries across the country. Lebanese Environment Minister Nasser Yassin said Israel's bombardment has displaced over 150,000 residents over the past 72 hours. The sharp escalation has raised concerns about a potential full-scale conflict between Israel and Lebanon, with fears that other regional powers could also be sucked in. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Amid Israel-Hezbollah conflict, UN Security Council holds emergency meeting on Lebanon

Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations urges world leaders to back his proposed “Pact for the Future,” which aims to establish a new system of global governance capable of addressing future crises.

Mexico, South Africa, Germany Back UNSC Reforms

UN Chief Antonio Guterres Says 'UNSC Should Be Made Reflective of Today's World'

The United States has extended its support to India's call for a permanent seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), after which the Quad leaders (US, India, Japan and Australia) also emphasised the need for comprehensive reform of the UN body in their joint statement.&nbsp;

The support was extended after bilateral talks&nbsp;were held between US President Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the sidelines of the Quad summit in Wilmington, Delaware, on Saturday (Sep 21).

"President&nbsp;Biden&nbsp;shared with Prime Minister Modi that the United States supports initiatives to reform global institutions to reflect India's important voice, including permanent membership for India in a reformed&nbsp;UN Security Council," said the White House, in a statement.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/quad-leaders-summit-biden-caught-on-hot-mic-saying-china-testing-us-760806">Quad Leaders' Summit: Biden caught on hot mic saying 'China testing us'</a>

For the past several years, India has been eyeing a permanent seat in the UNSC while underlining the country's global influence, its contributions to peacekeeping missions and its path to being the largest democracy in the world.

<h2>Quad issues joint statement underlying need for reform in UNSC</h2>

Quad members - India, Australia, Japan, and the United States - signed the 'Wilmington Declaration,' in which they underscored the need to reform&nbsp;the UN Security Council (UNSC) to make it more representative, inclusive, transparent, efficient, effective, democratic, and accountable.

The members underlined the need to expand the UNSC and ensure more representation from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean.

"Together, with our global and regional partners, we continue to support international institutions and initiatives that underpin global peace, prosperity and sustainable development. We reiterate our unwavering support for the UN Charter and the three pillars of the UN system," read the joint declaration.

Watch:&nbsp;Quad Summit: Modi attends Quad Leaders' Summit in Delaware

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/quad-summit-modi-attends-quad-leaders-summit-in-delaware-760818/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

"We will reform the UN Security Council, recognizing the urgent need to make it more representative, inclusive, transparent, efficient, effective, democratic and accountable through expansion in permanent and non-permanent categories of membership of the UN Security Council. This expansion of permanent seats should include representation for Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean in a reformed Security Council," it stated.

Biden had extended support to India's call for permanent membership in the UN Security Council in September last year during their bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Delhi.

Biden and Modi had issued a joint statement in which the former welcomed India's candidature of a non-permanent seat in UNSC in 2028-29.

(With inputs from agencies)

The United States has extended its support to India's call for a permanent seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), after which the Quad leaders (US, India, Japan and Australia) also emphasised the need for comprehensive reform of the UN body in their joint statement.

The United States has extended its support to India's call for a permanent seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), after which the Quad leaders (US, India, Japan and Australia) also emphasised the need for comprehensive reform of the UN body in their joint statement. The support was extended after bilateral talks were held between US President Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the sidelines of the Quad summit in Wilmington, Delaware, on Saturday (Sep 21). "President Biden shared with Prime Minister Modi that the United States supports initiatives to reform global institutions to reflect India's important voice, including permanent membership for India in a reformed UN Security Council," said the White House, in a statement. Also Read: Quad Leaders' Summit: Biden caught on hot mic saying 'China testing us' For the past several years, India has been eyeing a permanent seat in the UNSC while underlining the country's global influence, its contributions to peacekeeping missions and its path to being the largest democracy in the world. Quad issues joint statement underlying need for reform in UNSC Quad members - India, Australia, Japan, and the United States - signed the 'Wilmington Declaration,' in which they underscored the need to reform the UN Security Council (UNSC) to make it more representative, inclusive, transparent, efficient, effective, democratic, and accountable. The members underlined the need to expand the UNSC and ensure more representation from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean. "Together, with our global and regional partners, we continue to support international institutions and initiatives that underpin global peace, prosperity and sustainable development. We reiterate our unwavering support for the UN Charter and the three pillars of the UN system," read the joint declaration. Watch: Quad Summit: Modi attends Quad Leaders' Summit in Delaware "We will reform the UN Security Council, recognizing the urgent need to make it more representative, inclusive, transparent, efficient, effective, democratic and accountable through expansion in permanent and non-permanent categories of membership of the UN Security Council. This expansion of permanent seats should include representation for Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean in a reformed Security Council," it stated. Biden had extended support to India's call for permanent membership in the UN Security Council in September last year during their bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Delhi. Biden and Modi had issued a joint statement in which the former welcomed India's candidature of a non-permanent seat in UNSC in 2028-29. (With inputs from agencies)

US backs India for permanent UNSC seat, Quad leaders echo similar sentiment

A reform of the UN&nbsp;Security Council that does not address the lack of representation, particularly in the permanent category, would only “exacerbate” the current imbalances in its composition and render it “ill-equipped” to address current global challenges, India has said on behalf of the G4 countries.

“Recent global geopolitical events have clearly shown that the U.N. Security Council is unable to deliver on its primary responsibilities to safeguard international peace and security when the world needs it the most,” Chargé d’Affaires and Deputy Permanent Representative of India to the UN&nbsp;Ambassador R. Ravindra said on Monday (August 12, 2024).

He was delivering a statement on behalf of the G4 countries – Brazil, Germany, Japan and India – at the UNSC High-Level Debate on ‘Maintenance of International Peace and Security: Addressing the Historical Injustice and enhancing Africa’s effective representation in the UNSC’.

The realities of 1945, when the Council was established, have long been superseded by current geopolitical realities, with the need for change being felt across the board, Ravindra said ahead of next month’s annual high-level UN&nbsp;General Assembly session which world leaders will attend.

He noted that for the G4, the primary reason for the underperformance of the critical UN&nbsp;Security Council remains the non-representation of Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the under-representation of Asia Pacific in the permanent category.

“It is the G4’s firm belief, shared we believe by Africa and other groups, that any reform of the Council that does not address the lack of representation, particularly in the permanent category, would only exacerbate the current imbalances in the Council’s composition and render it ill-equipped to address Monday‘s (August 12, 2024) international challenges,” he said.

The 15-nation UNSC comprises five permanent, veto-wielding members – China, France, Russia, the UK&nbsp;and the US&nbsp;– and 10 non-permanent members, without veto powers, who are elected for two-year terms.

Underlining that the G4 has “walked the talk” when it comes to correcting historical injustices done to Africa, Ravindra said the group’s model of UNSC reforms has clearly proposed that the Security Council membership increase from the current 15 to 25-26 by adding six permanent and four or five non-permanent members.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/how-chinas-smokescreen-tricks-the-world-against-reforms-at-un-security-council-635950">How China’s ‘smokescreen’ tricks the world against reforms at UN Security Council</a>

Among the six new permanent members, two each are proposed to be from African States and Asia Pacific states, one from Latin American and Caribbean states, and one from West European and Other States.

“On rights and privileges associated with permanent memberships, such as the veto, we also support the Common African Position that as long as it exists, it should be available to all permanent members, both new and old alike,” he&nbsp;said.

Ravindra added that the G4 is convinced that African representation in permanent and non-permanent categories will be an indispensable part of UNSC reform for a more representative and effective Council.

The group believes it is “inconceivable” that Africa, which constitutes over 70 per cent of the UNSC’s agenda items under discussion, does not get a permanent voice at the horse-shoe table.

Also watch |&nbsp;UN recognises need for reform within security council; UN facing a crisis of credibility, says India

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/un-recognises-need-for-reform-within-security-council-un-facing-a-crisis-of-credibility-says-india-669488/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

“We as G4 continue to support fully these legitimate demands and aspirations from the people of Africa,” he said, adding that the group’s relationship with Africa is anchored in trust and mutual respect, and is focused on ensuring that Africa finds its “rightful” place in a new age of reformed multilateralism.

Making a few remarks in his national capacity and not on behalf of the G4, Mr Ravindra said that references to the Common African Position and majority support to expansion in the permanent category should be added in the Pact for the Future as it befits endorsement by global leaders.

With world leaders convening in New York later next month for the annual high-level UN&nbsp;General Assembly session, they will also participate in the ambitious Summit of the Future convened by UN&nbsp;Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

The summit will produce an inter-governmentally negotiated, action-oriented ‘Pact for the Future’ with chapters on sustainable development and financing for development, international peace and security, among other things.

“The draft Pact under negotiation has the potential to promote a multilateral system that reflects the realities of Monday’s (August 12, 2024), and that delivers for everyone everywhere,” the UN&nbsp;has said.

Ravindra further stressed that text-based negotiations in the Inter-Governmental Negotiations on UNSC reform should be expedited. “Consensus is an output of negotiations… It is important that we do not keep delaying reforms, waiting for a consensus to emerge as consensus can only be arrived at through text-based negotiations,” he said, adding that for this, the 80th anniversary of the UN&nbsp;next year could be a befitting milestone.

“The other scenario is of status quo where reforms and representation are only elusive. That should not be our path,” he said.

India emphasised the need to push for reforms, heeding the voice of the young and future generations, including from Africa, where the demand to correct the historical injustices grows&nbsp;ever stronger.

“Otherwise, we simply risk sending the Council down the path of oblivion and irrelevance,” he said.

The G4 asserted that representation in key multilateral bodies is still not a reality for Africa and many other regions of the world, and it is “imminent on us to correct this historical injustice. Not only from a historical point of view but also from the perspective of future generations, this holds true.” Ravindra noted that Africa is a continent with the youngest demography, vast natural resources, expanding capabilities, growing markets, and rising ambitions.

The G4 cited the example of “much younger bodies” like the G20, which inducted the African Union as a full member during the New Delhi Summit held in September last year under India’s presidency of the grouping.

Bodies like the G20 “have shown themselves more willing to accommodate the legitimate needs and aspirations of the African people,” Ravindra said.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience.

A reform of the UN Security Council that does not address the lack of representation, particularly in the permanent category, would only “exacerbate” the current imbalances in its composition and render it “ill-equipped” to address current global challenges, India has said on behalf of the G4 countries.

A reform of the UN Security Council that does not address the lack of representation, particularly in the permanent category, would only “exacerbate” the current imbalances in its composition and render it “ill-equipped” to address current global challenges, India has said on behalf of the G4 countries. “Recent global geopolitical events have clearly shown that the U.N. Security Council is unable to deliver on its primary responsibilities to safeguard international peace and security when the world needs it the most,” Chargé d’Affaires and Deputy Permanent Representative of India to the UN Ambassador R. Ravindra said on Monday (August 12, 2024). He was delivering a statement on behalf of the G4 countries – Brazil, Germany, Japan and India – at the UNSC High-Level Debate on ‘Maintenance of International Peace and Security: Addressing the Historical Injustice and enhancing Africa’s effective representation in the UNSC’. The realities of 1945, when the Council was established, have long been superseded by current geopolitical realities, with the need for change being felt across the board, Ravindra said ahead of next month’s annual high-level UN General Assembly session which world leaders will attend. He noted that for the G4, the primary reason for the underperformance of the critical UN Security Council remains the non-representation of Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the under-representation of Asia Pacific in the permanent category. “It is the G4’s firm belief, shared we believe by Africa and other groups, that any reform of the Council that does not address the lack of representation, particularly in the permanent category, would only exacerbate the current imbalances in the Council’s composition and render it ill-equipped to address Monday‘s (August 12, 2024) international challenges,” he said. The 15-nation UNSC comprises five permanent, veto-wielding members – China, France, Russia, the UK and the US – and 10 non-permanent members, without veto powers, who are elected for two-year terms. Underlining that the G4 has “walked the talk” when it comes to correcting historical injustices done to Africa, Ravindra said the group’s model of UNSC reforms has clearly proposed that the Security Council membership increase from the current 15 to 25-26 by adding six permanent and four or five non-permanent members. Also read | How China’s ‘smokescreen’ tricks the world against reforms at UN Security Council Among the six new permanent members, two each are proposed to be from African States and Asia Pacific states, one from Latin American and Caribbean states, and one from West European and Other States. “On rights and privileges associated with permanent memberships, such as the veto, we also support the Common African Position that as long as it exists, it should be available to all permanent members, both new and old alike,” he said. Ravindra added that the G4 is convinced that African representation in permanent and non-permanent categories will be an indispensable part of UNSC reform for a more representative and effective Council. The group believes it is “inconceivable” that Africa, which constitutes over 70 per cent of the UNSC’s agenda items under discussion, does not get a permanent voice at the horse-shoe table. Also watch | UN recognises need for reform within security council; UN facing a crisis of credibility, says India × “We as G4 continue to support fully these legitimate demands and aspirations from the people of Africa,” he said, adding that the group’s relationship with Africa is anchored in trust and mutual respect, and is focused on ensuring that Africa finds its “rightful” place in a new age of reformed multilateralism. Making a few remarks in his national capacity and not on behalf of the G4, Mr Ravindra said that references to the Common African Position and majority support to expansion in the permanent category should be added in the Pact for the Future as it befits endorsement by global leaders. With world leaders convening in New York later next month for the annual high-level UN General Assembly session, they will also participate in the ambitious Summit of the Future convened by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. The summit will produce an inter-governmentally negotiated, action-oriented ‘Pact for the Future’ with chapters on sustainable development and financing for development, international peace and security, among other things. “The draft Pact under negotiation has the potential to promote a multilateral system that reflects the realities of Monday’s (August 12, 2024), and that delivers for everyone everywhere,” the UN has said. Ravindra further stressed that text-based negotiations in the Inter-Governmental Negotiations on UNSC reform should be expedited. “Consensus is an output of negotiations… It is important that we do not keep delaying reforms, waiting for a consensus to emerge as consensus can only be arrived at through text-based negotiations,” he said, adding that for this, the 80th anniversary of the UN next year could be a befitting milestone. “The other scenario is of status quo where reforms and representation are only elusive. That should not be our path,” he said. India emphasised the need to push for reforms, heeding the voice of the young and future generations, including from Africa, where the demand to correct the historical injustices grows ever stronger. “Otherwise, we simply risk sending the Council down the path of oblivion and irrelevance,” he said. The G4 asserted that representation in key multilateral bodies is still not a reality for Africa and many other regions of the world, and it is “imminent on us to correct this historical injustice. Not only from a historical point of view but also from the perspective of future generations, this holds true.” Ravindra noted that Africa is a continent with the youngest demography, vast natural resources, expanding capabilities, growing markets, and rising ambitions. The G4 cited the example of “much younger bodies” like the G20, which inducted the African Union as a full member during the New Delhi Summit held in September last year under India’s presidency of the grouping. Bodies like the G20 “have shown themselves more willing to accommodate the legitimate needs and aspirations of the African people,” Ravindra said. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

India says without reforms UNSC 'ill equipped' to address global challenges

unsc

Unsc, News on Unsc, stories on Unsc, articles on Unsc, Unsc stories at Wion, Unsc news, Unsc latest news