The United Kingdom's Home Secretary Priti Patel said that the preparations for future flights and the next flights have already begun after the government's plan to fly asylum-seekers to Rwanda was blocked dramatically on Tuesday.&nbsp;

The British government is working on its plan of deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda. However, on Tuesday, there was a last-minute intervention by European judges as they had grounded the first plane minutes before it was due to depart.&nbsp;

Despite the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)'s intervention, the government appears to be firm in its decision of deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda. Patel told parliament that the government was committed to the policy. She said, "We will not be put off by the inevitable legal last-minute challenges nor we will allow mobs...to block removals."&nbsp;

"We believe that we are fully compliant with our domestic and international obligations, and preparations for our future flights and the next flights have already begun," the interior minister said, adding that it cost 5 million pounds a day to accommodate the migrants.&nbsp;

The statement has sparked fury among Conservatives. Also, the United Nations' refugee chief has called the policy "catastrophic". On the other hand, the entire leadership of the Church of England labelled it as immoral and shameful.&nbsp;

Importantly, the ECHR is not related to the European Union, which Britain left in January 2020.&nbsp;

London and Rwanda agreed in April that tens of thousands of asylum seekers who arrived illegally in Britain will be sent to the East African country to have their claims processed. Rwanda said it also remained fully committed to the plan.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

The United Kingdom's Home Secretary Priti Patel said that the preparations for future flights and the next flights have already begun after the government's plan to fly asylum-seekers to Rwanda was blocked dramatically on Tuesday.

The United Kingdom's Home Secretary Priti Patel said that the preparations for future flights and the next flights have already begun after the government's plan to fly asylum-seekers to Rwanda was blocked dramatically on Tuesday. The British government is working on its plan of deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda. However, on Tuesday, there was a last-minute intervention by European judges as they had grounded the first plane minutes before it was due to depart. Despite the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)'s intervention, the government appears to be firm in its decision of deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda. Patel told parliament that the government was committed to the policy. She said, "We will not be put off by the inevitable legal last-minute challenges nor we will allow mobs...to block removals." "We believe that we are fully compliant with our domestic and international obligations, and preparations for our future flights and the next flights have already begun," the interior minister said, adding that it cost 5 million pounds a day to accommodate the migrants. The statement has sparked fury among Conservatives. Also, the United Nations' refugee chief has called the policy "catastrophic". On the other hand, the entire leadership of the Church of England labelled it as immoral and shameful. Importantly, the ECHR is not related to the European Union, which Britain left in January 2020. London and Rwanda agreed in April that tens of thousands of asylum seekers who arrived illegally in Britain will be sent to the East African country to have their claims processed. Rwanda said it also remained fully committed to the plan. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Rwanda deportations: Will UK ditch European rights pact? Priti Patel says preparing for the next flight

British news outlet Dail Mail has said the UK Home Secretary Priti Patel's Rwanda asylum plan was 'working'. Patel's controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda has attracted fierce criticism in UK as well as in Rwanda.&nbsp;

Daily Mail said that fearing getting sent to Rwanda, asylum seekers who initially wanted to stay in the UK are withdrawing their applications. The report mentions that 10 such applicants have withdrawn their applications.

‘It’s a positive start,’ an unnamed 'Government source' was quoted in the report as saying.

Meanwhile, officials in Kigali have said that first batch of asylum seekers&nbsp;from UK will arrive in the country &nbsp;"in the next few weeks"

According to the arrangement, the British government will send anyone entering the UK illegally, as well as those who have arrived illegally since January 1, to Rwanda.

According to the Rwandan authorities, the British government will provide up to £120 million ($157 million, 144 million euros) to Kigali and migrants will be "integrated into communities across the country."&nbsp;

The proposals to relocate tens of thousands of people in the coming years, which is set to be challenged in British courts, has been slammed by rights groups as "inhumane".

Campaigners accuse President Paul Kagame's government of crushing dissent and keeping an iron grip on power, but while announcing the asylum deal on April 14, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Rwanda was "one of the safest countries in the world."

(With inputs from agencies)

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

British news outlet Dail Mail has said the UK Home Secretary Priti Patel's Rwanda asylum plan was 'working'. Patel's controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda has attracted fierce criticism in UK as well as in Rwanda.

British news outlet Dail Mail has said the UK Home Secretary Priti Patel's Rwanda asylum plan was 'working'. Patel's controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda has attracted fierce criticism in UK as well as in Rwanda. Daily Mail said that fearing getting sent to Rwanda, asylum seekers who initially wanted to stay in the UK are withdrawing their applications. The report mentions that 10 such applicants have withdrawn their applications. ‘It’s a positive start,’ an unnamed 'Government source' was quoted in the report as saying. Meanwhile, officials in Kigali have said that first batch of asylum seekers from UK will arrive in the country "in the next few weeks" According to the arrangement, the British government will send anyone entering the UK illegally, as well as those who have arrived illegally since January 1, to Rwanda. According to the Rwandan authorities, the British government will provide up to £120 million ($157 million, 144 million euros) to Kigali and migrants will be "integrated into communities across the country." The proposals to relocate tens of thousands of people in the coming years, which is set to be challenged in British courts, has been slammed by rights groups as "inhumane". Campaigners accuse President Paul Kagame's government of crushing dissent and keeping an iron grip on power, but while announcing the asylum deal on April 14, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Rwanda was "one of the safest countries in the world." (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE ×

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel's Rwanda plan is 'working', says report

In the biggest overhaul of its asylum system in decades, the United Kingdom has made the Nationality and Borders Act into law.

As per the Government of UK website this law will “deter illegal entry into the UK, breaking the business model of people-smuggling networks, and speed up the removal of those with no right to be in the UK.”

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/boris-johnsons-distraction-plan-forget-partygate-lets-take-back-control-of-uk-borders-471150">Boris Johnson's distraction plan: Forget partygate, let's 'take back control' of UK borders</a>

Despite widespread outrage and charges that it violates international law, Britain praised what it called a "world-leading" overhaul of its asylum system.

Home Secretary Priti Patel, who herself comes from a family of asylum seekers and whose parents escaped Idi Amin's Uganda, has dubbed the controversial act's passage a "landmark" that brought about changes suited for the 21st century.

The bill, which was passed late Wednesday by parliament, includes maximum life penalties for human traffickers who are accused of assisting unauthorised migration.

However, it also imposes harsher prison sentences for anyone who enters the country illegally, raising concerns that it could be used against asylum seekers.

Watch |&nbsp;Gravitas: Outrage over UK-Rwanda migrant deal

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-outrage-over-uk-rwanda-migrant-deal-471325/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

The act gives agencies more authority to expedite the expulsion of failed asylum seekers and "dangerous foreign criminals," as well as brings an end to "meritless" judicial battles to prevent deportation, as described by Patel.

Quite notably one of its provisions, dubs,&nbsp;people who have claimed asylum in another “safe” country “inadmissible’ to the UK asylum system.

Human rights organisations and charities that help refugees and migrants have lambasted the idea, and some have threatened to sue the government.

The new legislation, according to UN Refugee Chief Filippo Grandi, may violate both the letter and the spirit of global refugee accords to which Britain is a signatory.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/for-alleged-inspection-by-britains-interior-minister-rwanda-genocide-survivors-moved-out-of-hostel-report-473506">Rwanda genocide survivors moved out so Patel could inspect UK asylum facility</a>

He expressed disappointment that the country was considering closing its doors to asylum seekers and giving refugees a lower status, with the possibility of deportation looming.

According to Oxfam's head of government relations, Sam Nadel, it is "heinous" and "a devastating blow for families fleeing conflict and persecution."

"The government should be protecting, not punishing, refugees," he remarked.

Among the key reforms are:

<ul>
	<li>Tougher penalties for smugglers.</li>
	<li>Up to four years in prison for illegally entering the country or overstaying a visa.</li>
	<li>Measures to end “the merry-go-round of legal challenges which can be used to frustrate removal of those with no right to be in the UK”.</li>
	<li>A “US-style Electronic Travel Authorisation scheme”.</li>
</ul>

Watch WION LIVE HERE:

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

(With inputs from agencies)

In the biggest overhaul of its asylum system in decades, the United Kingdom has made the Nationality and Borders Act into law. As per the Government of UK website this law will “deter illegal entry into the UK, breaking the business model of people-smuggling networks, and speed up the removal of those with no right to be in the UK.

In the biggest overhaul of its asylum system in decades, the United Kingdom has made the Nationality and Borders Act into law. As per the Government of UK website this law will “deter illegal entry into the UK, breaking the business model of people-smuggling networks, and speed up the removal of those with no right to be in the UK.” Also read | Boris Johnson's distraction plan: Forget partygate, let's 'take back control' of UK borders Despite widespread outrage and charges that it violates international law, Britain praised what it called a "world-leading" overhaul of its asylum system. Home Secretary Priti Patel, who herself comes from a family of asylum seekers and whose parents escaped Idi Amin's Uganda, has dubbed the controversial act's passage a "landmark" that brought about changes suited for the 21st century. The bill, which was passed late Wednesday by parliament, includes maximum life penalties for human traffickers who are accused of assisting unauthorised migration. However, it also imposes harsher prison sentences for anyone who enters the country illegally, raising concerns that it could be used against asylum seekers. Watch | Gravitas: Outrage over UK-Rwanda migrant deal The act gives agencies more authority to expedite the expulsion of failed asylum seekers and "dangerous foreign criminals," as well as brings an end to "meritless" judicial battles to prevent deportation, as described by Patel. Quite notably one of its provisions, dubs, people who have claimed asylum in another “safe” country “inadmissible’ to the UK asylum system. Human rights organisations and charities that help refugees and migrants have lambasted the idea, and some have threatened to sue the government. The new legislation, according to UN Refugee Chief Filippo Grandi, may violate both the letter and the spirit of global refugee accords to which Britain is a signatory. Also read | Rwanda genocide survivors moved out so Patel could inspect UK asylum facility He expressed disappointment that the country was considering closing its doors to asylum seekers and giving refugees a lower status, with the possibility of deportation looming. According to Oxfam's head of government relations, Sam Nadel, it is "heinous" and "a devastating blow for families fleeing conflict and persecution." "The government should be protecting, not punishing, refugees," he remarked. Among the key reforms are: Tougher penalties for smugglers. Up to four years in prison for illegally entering the country or overstaying a visa. Measures to end “the merry-go-round of legal challenges which can be used to frustrate removal of those with no right to be in the UK”. A “US-style Electronic Travel Authorisation scheme”. Watch WION LIVE HERE: (With inputs from agencies)

Human rights groups concerned as UK brings about biggest overhaul to its asylum law

Survivors of the Rwandan genocide were moved out of their accommodation during a visit by Priti Patel, the UK home secretary, British media reported.&nbsp;

Patel signed a new agreement on migration with Rwanda in the Rwandan capital Kigali on April 14. Britain's interior minister described the agreement as a "world-first".&nbsp;

She had noted that it meant migrants who have entered the UK illegally could be sent to Rwanda and have their asylum claims decided there.&nbsp;

However, as per the latest reports, the hostel that will house asylum seekers sent from the UK, as planned, was dispatched on a day trip.&nbsp;

It was apparently done so that Priti Patel's visit won't get disrupted, The Guardian reported citing The Observer.&nbsp;

As per Rwandan officials, the facility which is based in the capital of Kigali, originally housed around 190 young people. However, the officials mentioned that most then have since moved out.&nbsp;

When the agreement was finalised this month, Patel, while speaking alongside Rwanda's Foreign Minister Vincent Biruta at a news conference, said that "the UK will provide funding and expertise to implement this agreement".&nbsp;

"Working together, the United Kingdom and Rwanda will help make the immigration system fairer, ensure that people are safe and enjoy new opportunities to flourish. We have agreed that people who enter the UK illegally will be considered for relocation to Rwanda to have their asylum claims decided," she said.&nbsp;

Survivors of the Rwandan genocide were moved out of their accommodation during a visit by Priti Patel, the UK home secretary, British media reported. Patel signed a new agreement on migration with Rwanda in the Rwandan capital Kigali on April 14.

Survivors of the Rwandan genocide were moved out of their accommodation during a visit by Priti Patel, the UK home secretary, British media reported. Patel signed a new agreement on migration with Rwanda in the Rwandan capital Kigali on April 14. Britain's interior minister described the agreement as a "world-first". She had noted that it meant migrants who have entered the UK illegally could be sent to Rwanda and have their asylum claims decided there. However, as per the latest reports, the hostel that will house asylum seekers sent from the UK, as planned, was dispatched on a day trip. It was apparently done so that Priti Patel's visit won't get disrupted, The Guardian reported citing The Observer. As per Rwandan officials, the facility which is based in the capital of Kigali, originally housed around 190 young people. However, the officials mentioned that most then have since moved out. When the agreement was finalised this month, Patel, while speaking alongside Rwanda's Foreign Minister Vincent Biruta at a news conference, said that "the UK will provide funding and expertise to implement this agreement". "Working together, the United Kingdom and Rwanda will help make the immigration system fairer, ensure that people are safe and enjoy new opportunities to flourish. We have agreed that people who enter the UK illegally will be considered for relocation to Rwanda to have their asylum claims decided," she said.

Rwanda genocide survivors moved out so Patel could inspect UK asylum facility

British Home Secretary Priti Patel has challenged anyone who opposes her plan to transfer migrants to Rwanda to come up with a better alternative.

After religious leaders expressed their worries in a mounting debate over the controversial idea, which has prompted a huge outcry from campaigners and academics, the Home Secretary retaliated.

In a joint column with Rwandan foreign minister Vincent Biruta in The Times, the idea was "bold and innovative," and would help prevent tiny boats from crossing the Channel.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, stated that transporting asylum seekers over 4,000 miles to East Africa was "subcontracting our responsibilities" and went against "God's nature."&nbsp;

She didn't call the Archbishop by his name.The Church of England, however, was the most high-profile "institution" to criticise the idea yesterday, with the Archbishop of York also expressing his displeasure.

It was the latest in a series of spats between the archbishop and prominent conservatives, with some suggesting the church's leader should propose a better alternative.&nbsp;

What is the UK’s controversial Rwanda plan?

The UK has reached an agreement with Rwanda to deport some asylum seekers to the East African country, which Prime Minister Boris Johnson claims will "save countless lives" from human trafficking.The trial scheme's main target will be single guys arriving by boat or lorry.

British Home Secretary Priti Patel has challenged anyone who opposes her plan to transfer migrants to Rwanda to come up with a better alternative. After religious leaders expressed their worries in a mounting debate over the controversial idea, which has prompted a huge outcry from campaigners and academics, the Home Secretary retaliated.

British Home Secretary Priti Patel has challenged anyone who opposes her plan to transfer migrants to Rwanda to come up with a better alternative. After religious leaders expressed their worries in a mounting debate over the controversial idea, which has prompted a huge outcry from campaigners and academics, the Home Secretary retaliated. In a joint column with Rwandan foreign minister Vincent Biruta in The Times, the idea was "bold and innovative," and would help prevent tiny boats from crossing the Channel. The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, stated that transporting asylum seekers over 4,000 miles to East Africa was "subcontracting our responsibilities" and went against "God's nature." She didn't call the Archbishop by his name.The Church of England, however, was the most high-profile "institution" to criticise the idea yesterday, with the Archbishop of York also expressing his displeasure. It was the latest in a series of spats between the archbishop and prominent conservatives, with some suggesting the church's leader should propose a better alternative. What is the UK’s controversial Rwanda plan? The UK has reached an agreement with Rwanda to deport some asylum seekers to the East African country, which Prime Minister Boris Johnson claims will "save countless lives" from human trafficking.The trial scheme's main target will be single guys arriving by boat or lorry.

'Critics have no plan': Priti Patel hits back at Archbishop on Rwanda

Britain is planning to send tens of thousands of asylum seekers to the East African country of Rwanda. United Kingdom’s move is to break people-smuggling networks, thereby stemming the flow of migrants across the English Channel.

Opposition MPs accused Johnson of trying to divert attention away from his fine for violating coronavirus lockdown guidelines, while human rights groups criticised the project as "inhumane."

"People fleeing war, conflict and persecution deserve compassion and empathy. They should not be traded like commodities and transferred abroad for processing," said Gillian Triggs, UNHCR's Assistant High Commissioner for Protection.

Announcing the plan on Thursday UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson during a speech in Kent, said "we must ensure that the only route to asylum in the UK is a safe and legal one."

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-mp-convicted-of-sexual-assault-against-teen-quits-to-focus-on-clearing-his-name-triggers-by-elections-471101" hreflang="en">UK MP convicted of sexual assault against teen quits to focus on clearing his name; triggers by-elections</a>

Johnson, who has been for quite some time has been embattled in the ‘partygate scandal’ has been facing pressure to deliver on his 2016 campaign promise to "take back control" of Britain's borders.

Labour Party’s Yvette Cooper, called the plan, "unworkable and unethical."

Watch |&nbsp;Britain hardens its migration policy, plans to send migrants to Rwanda

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/britain-hardens-its-migration-policy-plans-to-send-migrants-to-rwanda-471106/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Concerns were also expressed about Rwanda's human rights record, which even the British government highlighted last year.

Rwanda, according to Human Rights Watch (HRW), violates some of the most basic human rights.

"Refugees have been abused in Rwanda and the government has, at times, kidnapped Rwandan refugees outside the country to bring them home to face trial and ill-treatment," said HRW's Central Africa director Lewis Mudge.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uks-asylum-seekers-relocation-to-rwanda-policy-attracts-sharp-criticism-471062">UK: Govt move to send asylum seekers to Rwanda leads to sharp criticism </a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;

Under this plan people who have arrived in the UK illegally since January 1&nbsp;can now be relocated to Rwanda.

"Those who try to jump the queue or abuse our systems will find no automatic path to set them up in our country, but rather be swiftly and humanely removed to a safe third country or their country of origin," said Johnson.

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel signed the collaboration agreement in Kigali and on Thursday presented it at a joint news conference with Rwandan Foreign Minister Vincent Biruta.

The strategy will face legal hurdles, according to Johnson, but the alliance is "fully compliant" with international legal requirements.&nbsp;The British government would make a 120 million pound ($158 million) initial contribution.

(With inputs from agencies)

Britain is planning to send tens of thousands of asylum seekers to the East African country of Rwanda. United Kingdom’s move is to break people-smuggling networks, thereby stemming the flow of migrants across the English Channel.

Britain is planning to send tens of thousands of asylum seekers to the East African country of Rwanda. United Kingdom’s move is to break people-smuggling networks, thereby stemming the flow of migrants across the English Channel. Opposition MPs accused Johnson of trying to divert attention away from his fine for violating coronavirus lockdown guidelines, while human rights groups criticised the project as "inhumane." "People fleeing war, conflict and persecution deserve compassion and empathy. They should not be traded like commodities and transferred abroad for processing," said Gillian Triggs, UNHCR's Assistant High Commissioner for Protection. Announcing the plan on Thursday UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson during a speech in Kent, said "we must ensure that the only route to asylum in the UK is a safe and legal one." Also read | UK MP convicted of sexual assault against teen quits to focus on clearing his name; triggers by-elections Johnson, who has been for quite some time has been embattled in the ‘partygate scandal’ has been facing pressure to deliver on his 2016 campaign promise to "take back control" of Britain's borders. Labour Party’s Yvette Cooper, called the plan, "unworkable and unethical." Watch | Britain hardens its migration policy, plans to send migrants to Rwanda Concerns were also expressed about Rwanda's human rights record, which even the British government highlighted last year. Rwanda, according to Human Rights Watch (HRW), violates some of the most basic human rights. "Refugees have been abused in Rwanda and the government has, at times, kidnapped Rwandan refugees outside the country to bring them home to face trial and ill-treatment," said HRW's Central Africa director Lewis Mudge. Also read | UK: Govt move to send asylum seekers to Rwanda leads to sharp criticism Under this plan people who have arrived in the UK illegally since January 1 can now be relocated to Rwanda. "Those who try to jump the queue or abuse our systems will find no automatic path to set them up in our country, but rather be swiftly and humanely removed to a safe third country or their country of origin," said Johnson. UK Home Secretary Priti Patel signed the collaboration agreement in Kigali and on Thursday presented it at a joint news conference with Rwandan Foreign Minister Vincent Biruta. The strategy will face legal hurdles, according to Johnson, but the alliance is "fully compliant" with international legal requirements. The British government would make a 120 million pound ($158 million) initial contribution. (With inputs from agencies)

Boris Johnson's distraction plan: Forget partygate, let's 'take back control' of UK borders

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel has said that the borders bill will end appalling, blatant abuse of the immigration and the asylum system.

She took to microblogging platform Twitter and said, ''We're changing UK laws to introduce new scientific methods for assessing the age of asylum seekers to stop these appalling abuses.''

In the latest crackdown against migrants, adults who pose as child asylum seekers could face X-ray age checks on borders.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-announces-harsher-sentences-for-channel-migrants-395743">Also read |&nbsp;UK announces harsher sentences for Channel migrants</a>

"The practice of single grown adult men, masquerading as children claiming asylum is an appalling abuse of our system which we will end," Patel said in a statement.

A new committee will look at a range of scientific methods for determining age and assess their accuracy and reliability as well as considering medical and ethical issues.

The UK government's Nationality and Borders Bill is currently before parliament, promising tougher action against people smugglers and, controversially, migrants themselves.

If passed, the bill, opposed by rights groups, will allow the return of asylum seekers who have passed through so-called "safe third countries".

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/macron-tells-uk-to-get-serious-over-english-channel-migrant-issue-432185">Also read |&nbsp;Macron tells UK to 'get serious' over English Channel migrant issue</a>

According to analysis of Home Office data, last year, record numbers of more than 28,000 migrants who paid thousands of pounds to people traffickers arrived in the UK in often flimsy boats.

This was more than triple the numbers seen in 2020, with the higher numbers attributed to the smugglers' use of bigger boats to navigate one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.&nbsp;

Tragically, 27 migrants drowned off France on November 24 after they attempted to cross in a boat likened by French officials to a children's inflatable pool.

The high number of migrants crossing to Britain from mainland Europe has become a political headache for British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

The flow of migrants has also soured Britain's relations with France, prompting an unseemly blame game even as both sides try to disrupt the people trafficking networks.&nbsp;

 
(With inputs from agencies)

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel has said that the borders bill will end appalling, blatant abuse of the immigration and the asylum system. She took to microblogging platform Twitter and said, ''We're changing UK laws to introduce new scientific methods for assessing the age of asylum seekers to stop these appalling abuses.

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel has said that the borders bill will end appalling, blatant abuse of the immigration and the asylum system. She took to microblogging platform Twitter and said, ''We're changing UK laws to introduce new scientific methods for assessing the age of asylum seekers to stop these appalling abuses.'' In the latest crackdown against migrants, adults who pose as child asylum seekers could face X-ray age checks on borders. Also read | UK announces harsher sentences for Channel migrants "The practice of single grown adult men, masquerading as children claiming asylum is an appalling abuse of our system which we will end," Patel said in a statement. A new committee will look at a range of scientific methods for determining age and assess their accuracy and reliability as well as considering medical and ethical issues. The UK government's Nationality and Borders Bill is currently before parliament, promising tougher action against people smugglers and, controversially, migrants themselves. If passed, the bill, opposed by rights groups, will allow the return of asylum seekers who have passed through so-called "safe third countries". Also read | Macron tells UK to 'get serious' over English Channel migrant issue According to analysis of Home Office data, last year, record numbers of more than 28,000 migrants who paid thousands of pounds to people traffickers arrived in the UK in often flimsy boats. This was more than triple the numbers seen in 2020, with the higher numbers attributed to the smugglers' use of bigger boats to navigate one of the world's busiest shipping lanes. Tragically, 27 migrants drowned off France on November 24 after they attempted to cross in a boat likened by French officials to a children's inflatable pool. The high number of migrants crossing to Britain from mainland Europe has become a political headache for British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. The flow of migrants has also soured Britain's relations with France, prompting an unseemly blame game even as both sides try to disrupt the people trafficking networks. (With inputs from agencies)

Priti Patel says borders bill will end appalling abuse of immigration

Regulations governing crossbows in Britain are receiving renewed attention after a man was apprehended with one on the grounds of Windsor Castle, where members of the royal family had gathered for the Christmas holiday.

“We are considering options to strengthen controls on crossbows,” a spokesman for Britain’s Home Office said in a statement Tuesday, as part of a continuing review of rules on lethal weapons ordered this year by Priti Patel, the home secretary.

The renewed scrutiny comes days after an intruder breached the castle grounds on Christmas morning. A 19-year-old man was arrested “on suspicion of breach or trespass of a protected site and possession of an offensive weapon,” according to police, while Queen Elizabeth II was on the premises with other members of the royal family.

The British monarch had celebrated the holiday at Windsor Castle instead of at her estate in Sandringham, Norfolk, as is her usual practice. Buckingham Palace said the decision was a “precautionary approach” because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The man arrested, whom police declined to identify, did not enter any buildings or endanger the royal family. But police officers said they found a crossbow after searching him, adding that he was in the care of medical professionals receiving treatment for mental health issues.

Under existing legislation, crossbows can be purchased over the counter or on the internet by those older than 18. Owners do not need a license or certificate to operate the weapons and, unlike shotguns and firearms, police do not have an official record of who owns them and how many are in circulation.

Detectives said they were reviewing a video as part of the investigation, the Metropolitan Police said in a statement Monday, but declined to give further details.

Controls on weapons such as crossbows drew particular concern in 2018 after a British man broke into a neighbor’s home in East Yorkshire, shooting and killing him with a crossbow and injuring his pregnant partner. In a 2021 report investigating the death of the man, a coroner for the county asked top policing officials, including Patel, to review legislation regulating the purchase and possession of crossbows.

“Evidence was heard about the power and lethal capabilities of these weapons, as well as the fact that they are essentially silent,” the coroner, professor Paul Marks, said in the report.

“In my opinion,” he added, “there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.”

The Home Office said work reviewing the legislation was continuing after the episode in East Yorkshire, adding that it was already an offense to possess arrows, or possess offensive weapons in public spaces “without good reason or lawful authority.”

Regulations governing crossbows in Britain are receiving renewed attention after a man was apprehended with one on the grounds of Windsor Castle, where members of the royal family had gathered for the Christmas holiday.

Regulations governing crossbows in Britain are receiving renewed attention after a man was apprehended with one on the grounds of Windsor Castle, where members of the royal family had gathered for the Christmas holiday. “We are considering options to strengthen controls on crossbows,” a spokesman for Britain’s Home Office said in a statement Tuesday, as part of a continuing review of rules on lethal weapons ordered this year by Priti Patel, the home secretary. The renewed scrutiny comes days after an intruder breached the castle grounds on Christmas morning. A 19-year-old man was arrested “on suspicion of breach or trespass of a protected site and possession of an offensive weapon,” according to police, while Queen Elizabeth II was on the premises with other members of the royal family. The British monarch had celebrated the holiday at Windsor Castle instead of at her estate in Sandringham, Norfolk, as is her usual practice. Buckingham Palace said the decision was a “precautionary approach” because of the coronavirus pandemic. The man arrested, whom police declined to identify, did not enter any buildings or endanger the royal family. But police officers said they found a crossbow after searching him, adding that he was in the care of medical professionals receiving treatment for mental health issues. Under existing legislation, crossbows can be purchased over the counter or on the internet by those older than 18. Owners do not need a license or certificate to operate the weapons and, unlike shotguns and firearms, police do not have an official record of who owns them and how many are in circulation. Detectives said they were reviewing a video as part of the investigation, the Metropolitan Police said in a statement Monday, but declined to give further details. Controls on weapons such as crossbows drew particular concern in 2018 after a British man broke into a neighbor’s home in East Yorkshire, shooting and killing him with a crossbow and injuring his pregnant partner. In a 2021 report investigating the death of the man, a coroner for the county asked top policing officials, including Patel, to review legislation regulating the purchase and possession of crossbows. “Evidence was heard about the power and lethal capabilities of these weapons, as well as the fact that they are essentially silent,” the coroner, professor Paul Marks, said in the report. “In my opinion,” he added, “there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.” The Home Office said work reviewing the legislation was continuing after the episode in East Yorkshire, adding that it was already an offense to possess arrows, or possess offensive weapons in public spaces “without good reason or lawful authority.”

Britain’s crossbow rules in the crosshairs after Windsor Castle breach

People found guilty of online racist abuse against footballers will be banned from attending games for up to 10 years under new laws, Britain's Home Secretary Priti Patel said.

Football Banning Orders, imposed to prevent violence or disorder at regulated matches, bar individuals from attending games for a minimum of three and a maximum of 10 years.

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/covid-outbreak-at-aston-villa-made-one-player-reluctant-to-get-out-of-his-car-reveals-boss-steven-gerrard-439331">Covid outbreak at Aston Villa made one player reluctant to get out of his car, reveals boss Steven Gerrard</a>

The existing legislation will be extended to cover online hate offences after Prime Minister Boris Johnson vowed to toughen measures in July in the wake of racist abuse aimed at England's Black players following defeat in the Euro 2020 final.

"This summer we saw the beautiful game marred by disgraceful racism from online trolls, who hid behind their keyboards and abused our footballers," Patel was quoted as saying by British media.

"Those responsible for appalling racist abuse online must be punished. The changes to the law I am announcing will make sure they are banned from attending football matches."

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/premier-league-liverpool-v-leeds-wolves-v-watford-games-postponed-amid-rise-in-covid-19-cases-439343">Premier League: Liverpool v Leeds, Wolves v Watford games postponed amid rise in COVID-19 cases</a>

The new law will be brought forward early in the new year, British media reported, in the form of an amendment to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.

According to government statistics, there were 1,359 football banning orders in force across England and Wales as of Aug. 1.

People found guilty of online racist abuse against footballers will be banned from attending games for up to 10 years under new laws, Britain's Home Secretary Priti Patel said.

People found guilty of online racist abuse against footballers will be banned from attending games for up to 10 years under new laws, Britain's Home Secretary Priti Patel said. Football Banning Orders, imposed to prevent violence or disorder at regulated matches, bar individuals from attending games for a minimum of three and a maximum of 10 years. ALSO READ: Covid outbreak at Aston Villa made one player reluctant to get out of his car, reveals boss Steven Gerrard The existing legislation will be extended to cover online hate offences after Prime Minister Boris Johnson vowed to toughen measures in July in the wake of racist abuse aimed at England's Black players following defeat in the Euro 2020 final. "This summer we saw the beautiful game marred by disgraceful racism from online trolls, who hid behind their keyboards and abused our footballers," Patel was quoted as saying by British media. "Those responsible for appalling racist abuse online must be punished. The changes to the law I am announcing will make sure they are banned from attending football matches." ALSO READ: Premier League: Liverpool v Leeds, Wolves v Watford games postponed amid rise in COVID-19 cases The new law will be brought forward early in the new year, British media reported, in the form of an amendment to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. According to government statistics, there were 1,359 football banning orders in force across England and Wales as of Aug. 1.

Online racist abuse offenders to be banned from football matches: UK Home Secretary Priti Patel

France has withdrawn an invitation to UK home secretary Priti Patel to join talks on the migrant crisis following a public letter from Prime Minister Boris Johnson to President Emmanuel Macron.

France cancels UK invitation to migrant crisis talks after Boris Johnson's letter

David Fuller has admitted to scores of sex attacks on corpses in mortuaries in the worst case of necrophilia in the legal history of the UK.

The 67-year-old electrician pleaded guilty to murdering then sexually assaulting two women in 1987.

He stangled&nbsp;25-year-old Wendy Knell and Caroline Pierce, 20, in two separate attacks months apart in Kent, southeast England.

The ''prowler'' was caught following a DNA breakthrough by the police during the investigation.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/u-turn-british-government-votes-to-protect-sleazy-mp-owen-paterson-from-suspension-426800" hreflang="en">British government votes to protect 'sleazy' MP Owen Paterson from suspension</a>

During a thorough search of his house, they had found he had filmed himself carrying out the attacks at the two mortuaries.

Between 2008 and 2020, his victims included three children under the age of 18 and others older than 85.

According to the Crown Prosecution Service, Fuller admitted 51 other offences, including 44 charges relating to 78 identified victims in mortuaries.

''I have never come across anything like it, the numbers, the nature of offending, and I don't know anybody who has, be they police or other prosecutors,'' said senior CPS prosecutor Libby Clark.

"This was a man with a very, very dark secret."

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/monster-in-uniform-uk-cop-admits-to-killing-sarah-everard-who-was-just-walking-home-in-the-night-396970">Also read |&nbsp;Monster in uniform: UK cop admits to killing Sarah Everard who was just walking home in the night</a>

Health Secretary Sajid Javid said he had asked the health sector to review mortuary and post-mortem access in light of the findings.

Meanwhile, Home Secretary Priti Patel called&nbsp;the case "shocking" and said expressed her&nbsp;heartfelt sympathies for the families of the victims.

"The sickening nature of the crimes committed will understandably cause public revulsion and concern," she added.

Over 150 specialist family liaison officers have been tasked with visiting the victims' families. They will be given $2.0 million or £1.5 million as pay for bespoke support.

(With inputs from agencies)

David Fuller has admitted to scores of sex attacks on corpses in mortuaries in the worst case of necrophilia in the legal history of the UK. The 67-year-old electrician pleaded guilty to murdering then sexually assaulting two women in 1987.

David Fuller has admitted to scores of sex attacks on corpses in mortuaries in the worst case of necrophilia in the legal history of the UK. The 67-year-old electrician pleaded guilty to murdering then sexually assaulting two women in 1987. He stangled 25-year-old Wendy Knell and Caroline Pierce, 20, in two separate attacks months apart in Kent, southeast England. The ''prowler'' was caught following a DNA breakthrough by the police during the investigation. Also read | British government votes to protect 'sleazy' MP Owen Paterson from suspension During a thorough search of his house, they had found he had filmed himself carrying out the attacks at the two mortuaries. Between 2008 and 2020, his victims included three children under the age of 18 and others older than 85. According to the Crown Prosecution Service, Fuller admitted 51 other offences, including 44 charges relating to 78 identified victims in mortuaries. ''I have never come across anything like it, the numbers, the nature of offending, and I don't know anybody who has, be they police or other prosecutors,'' said senior CPS prosecutor Libby Clark. "This was a man with a very, very dark secret." Also read | Monster in uniform: UK cop admits to killing Sarah Everard who was just walking home in the night Health Secretary Sajid Javid said he had asked the health sector to review mortuary and post-mortem access in light of the findings. Meanwhile, Home Secretary Priti Patel called the case "shocking" and said expressed her heartfelt sympathies for the families of the victims. "The sickening nature of the crimes committed will understandably cause public revulsion and concern," she added. Over 150 specialist family liaison officers have been tasked with visiting the victims' families. They will be given $2.0 million or £1.5 million as pay for bespoke support. (With inputs from agencies)

'Prowler' David Fuller admits scores of sex attacks on corpses in mortuaries

Ali Harbi Ali, affiliated with the Islamic State, has been charged with the murder of British MP David Amess.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said he "has a terrorist connection, namely that it had both religious and ideological motivations".

The 25-year-old suspect was the son of an ex-media advisor to a former prime minister of Somalia.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-british-lawmaker-david-amess-stabbed-to-death-421126/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

According to prosecutor James Cable, he had been planning to kill a member of parliament for years.

The killing of Amess had raised safety concerns about the safety of elected politicians and has prompted for better protection of lawmakers.

They are especially vulnerable when they hold "surgeries", or one-to-one meetings with voters in their constituencies, a tradition considered a bedrock of democracy.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-says-will-beef-up-mps-security-after-mp-killed-421531">Also read |&nbsp;UK says will beef up MPs' security after MP killed</a>

Intelligence officers had upgraded the threat level for politicians to "substantial" as per Home Secretary Priti Patel. She called the killing "an attack on our democracy".&nbsp;

Amess was stabbed to death in the Belfairs Methodist Church in Leigh-on-Sea, northeast of London. He was a member of Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Conservative Party.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/police-declare-fatal-stabbing-of-uk-conservative-mp-as-terrorist-incident-421148">Also read |&nbsp;Police declare fatal stabbing of UK Conservative MP as 'terrorist incident'</a>

His family has urged the public to "Set aside hatred and work together towards togetherness. Whatever one's race, religious or political beliefs, be tolerant and try to understand."

Matt Jukes, assistant commissioner for specialist operations at the Met said "I understand the huge level of public interest in this case. But now a charge has been brought, it is vitally important that everyone exercises restraint when commenting on it publicly, to ensure future court proceedings are not prejudiced in any way."

In 2016, Labour MP Jo Cox was killed as she met constituents near Leeds, northern England, in the febrile run-up to the Brexit referendum. 
&nbsp;

Ali Harbi Ali, affiliated with the Islamic State, has been charged with the murder of British MP David Amess. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said he "has a terrorist connection, namely that it had both religious and ideological motivations".

Ali Harbi Ali, affiliated with the Islamic State, has been charged with the murder of British MP David Amess. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said he "has a terrorist connection, namely that it had both religious and ideological motivations". The 25-year-old suspect was the son of an ex-media advisor to a former prime minister of Somalia. According to prosecutor James Cable, he had been planning to kill a member of parliament for years. The killing of Amess had raised safety concerns about the safety of elected politicians and has prompted for better protection of lawmakers. They are especially vulnerable when they hold "surgeries", or one-to-one meetings with voters in their constituencies, a tradition considered a bedrock of democracy. Also read | UK says will beef up MPs' security after MP killed Intelligence officers had upgraded the threat level for politicians to "substantial" as per Home Secretary Priti Patel. She called the killing "an attack on our democracy". Amess was stabbed to death in the Belfairs Methodist Church in Leigh-on-Sea, northeast of London. He was a member of Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Conservative Party. Also read | Police declare fatal stabbing of UK Conservative MP as 'terrorist incident' His family has urged the public to "Set aside hatred and work together towards togetherness. Whatever one's race, religious or political beliefs, be tolerant and try to understand." Matt Jukes, assistant commissioner for specialist operations at the Met said "I understand the huge level of public interest in this case. But now a charge has been brought, it is vitally important that everyone exercises restraint when commenting on it publicly, to ensure future court proceedings are not prejudiced in any way." In 2016, Labour MP Jo Cox was killed as she met constituents near Leeds, northern England, in the febrile run-up to the Brexit referendum.

Islamic State supporter charged in murder of UK lawmaker David Amess

Boris Johnson recently infuriated UK Home Secretary Priti Patel by overruling attempts to make public sexual harassment a crime. This has further led to concerns at the Home Office that the Prime Minister views the issue as mere “wolf-whistling”, rather than the aggressive targeting of women and girls.

After he blocked plans to make public sexual harassment a specific offence, there have been reports of tensions between Johnson and Priti Patel.&nbsp;

Last week, Johnson announced that he did not support any new law on tackling violence against women as he claimed that there is “abundant” existing legislation.&nbsp;

The sources believe the prime minister has completely misjudged the public mood as Patel's consultation on tackling violence against women and girls, drew feedback from 180,000 contributors. The majority were sent after the murder of Sarah Everard in March.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/to-safeguard-lone-women-uk-looks-for-walk-me-home-phone-tracker-419503">Also read |&nbsp;To safeguard lone women, UK looks for 'walk me home' phone-tracker</a>

Also, many respondents complained of being hassled daily.

A senior Home Office source, who requested anonymity, was quoted by The Guardian as saying, "Trying to bring it down to wolf-whistling is massively problematic. But we’re going to make this happen. People are prepared to put their political capital behind this, and the home secretary is among those very much behind it.”

Another source said the prime minister seemed not to understand the issue.

“Make no mistake, Boris Johnson is the person blocking and holding this back. He seems to be stuck in the past on this issue," the source was quoted by The Guardian.

Boris Johnson recently infuriated UK Home Secretary Priti Patel by overruling attempts to make public sexual harassment a crime. This has further led to concerns at the Home Office that the Prime Minister views the issue as mere “wolf-whistling”, rather than the aggressive targeting of women and girls.

Boris Johnson recently infuriated UK Home Secretary Priti Patel by overruling attempts to make public sexual harassment a crime. This has further led to concerns at the Home Office that the Prime Minister views the issue as mere “wolf-whistling”, rather than the aggressive targeting of women and girls. After he blocked plans to make public sexual harassment a specific offence, there have been reports of tensions between Johnson and Priti Patel. Last week, Johnson announced that he did not support any new law on tackling violence against women as he claimed that there is “abundant” existing legislation. The sources believe the prime minister has completely misjudged the public mood as Patel's consultation on tackling violence against women and girls, drew feedback from 180,000 contributors. The majority were sent after the murder of Sarah Everard in March. Also read | To safeguard lone women, UK looks for 'walk me home' phone-tracker Also, many respondents complained of being hassled daily. A senior Home Office source, who requested anonymity, was quoted by The Guardian as saying, "Trying to bring it down to wolf-whistling is massively problematic. But we’re going to make this happen. People are prepared to put their political capital behind this, and the home secretary is among those very much behind it.” Another source said the prime minister seemed not to understand the issue. “Make no mistake, Boris Johnson is the person blocking and holding this back. He seems to be stuck in the past on this issue," the source was quoted by The Guardian.

Priti Patel furious as Boris Johnson blocks public sexual harassment law

One of the most popular drugs among the young people of the UK is about to be criminalised in the country, Priti Patel said.<o:p></o:p>

As per a report, one on ten (more than half a million) young people between the age of 16 and 24, have been inhaling nitrous oxide in the UK.<o:p></o:p>

Home Secretary Priti Patel said she is ready to "take tough action"&nbsp;on the widespread usage of this laughing gas in the UK. As per reports, Patel is planning to criminalise possession of this drug.

<o:p>Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/cats-experiencing-life-threatening-stress-due-to-extra-attention-from-owners-410387">Cats experiencing 'life threatening' stress due to extra attention from owners</a></o:p>

Patel has directed the independent Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD)&nbsp;to review the harms of nitrous oxide, in order to help the government take a concrete decision on its legal status.<o:p></o:p>

Laughing gas "can cause serious long-term effects such as vitamin B12 deficiency and anaemia. It is also commonly used at antisocial gatherings and leads to widespread littering in public places, bringing misery to communities,"&nbsp;Patel said. "Misusing drugs can have a devastating impact on lives and communities. We are determined to do all we can to address this issue and protect the futures of our children and young people."<o:p></o:p>

The drug is widely available in small cylinders which is then usually transferred to a balloon, from which young people inhale it in form of a gas. Commonly known as the laughing gas, it is a common sight in clubs and parties.

<o:p>Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/climate-change-us-extreme-weather-conditions-associated-to-arctic-warming-410374">Climate change: US extreme weather conditions associated to Arctic warming</a></o:p>

Nitrous oxide is also easily available online, however, majority of the suppliers attach a warning against using this drug for psychoactive properties.<o:p></o:p>

While Patel believes this is an important step to control drug usage in the country, some experts have opposed this move and warned against a possible spread of hesitancy in young people.<o:p></o:p>

"The government’s insistence on criminalisation and incarceration for minor drug offences worsens problems linked to illicit drug use, including social inequality and violence,"&nbsp;said Burcu Borysik, head of policy at the Royal Society for Public Health. "The heavy-handed enforcement approach to drugs does nothing but spread fear among young people, prevents them from seeking the support they need, and unnecessarily drags them into the criminal justice system."<o:p></o:p>

One of the most popular drugs among the young people of the UK is about to be criminalised in the country, Priti Patel said. As per a report, one on ten (more than half a million) young people between the age of 16 and 24, have been inhaling nitrous oxide in the UK.

One of the most popular drugs among the young people of the UK is about to be criminalised in the country, Priti Patel said. As per a report, one on ten (more than half a million) young people between the age of 16 and 24, have been inhaling nitrous oxide in the UK. Home Secretary Priti Patel said she is ready to "take tough action" on the widespread usage of this laughing gas in the UK. As per reports, Patel is planning to criminalise possession of this drug. Also read | Cats experiencing 'life threatening' stress due to extra attention from owners Patel has directed the independent Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) to review the harms of nitrous oxide, in order to help the government take a concrete decision on its legal status. Laughing gas "can cause serious long-term effects such as vitamin B12 deficiency and anaemia. It is also commonly used at antisocial gatherings and leads to widespread littering in public places, bringing misery to communities," Patel said. "Misusing drugs can have a devastating impact on lives and communities. We are determined to do all we can to address this issue and protect the futures of our children and young people." The drug is widely available in small cylinders which is then usually transferred to a balloon, from which young people inhale it in form of a gas. Commonly known as the laughing gas, it is a common sight in clubs and parties. Also read | Climate change: US extreme weather conditions associated to Arctic warming Nitrous oxide is also easily available online, however, majority of the suppliers attach a warning against using this drug for psychoactive properties. While Patel believes this is an important step to control drug usage in the country, some experts have opposed this move and warned against a possible spread of hesitancy in young people. "The government’s insistence on criminalisation and incarceration for minor drug offences worsens problems linked to illicit drug use, including social inequality and violence," said Burcu Borysik, head of policy at the Royal Society for Public Health. "The heavy-handed enforcement approach to drugs does nothing but spread fear among young people, prevents them from seeking the support they need, and unnecessarily drags them into the criminal justice system."

No more laughing gas: UK set to ban Nitrous Oxide soon

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel met with a group of Afghan refugees who arrived at London Heathrow Airport on Thursday. These evacuees were among the last to escape before two explosions struck near Kabul Airport.

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel meets with Afghan evacuees arriving at Heathrow

Two men who were accused of racially targeting UK Minister Priti Patel were summonsed to court on May 29 and charged with sending a grossly offensive message by a public communication network, which comes with a custodial sentence or fine or both.

2 men held for racially abusing UK minister Priti Patel on social media

Two men who were charged with sending a grossly offensive message and accused of inciting "racial hatred" with a social media video targeting UK Home Secretary Priti Patel admitted to the charge in court on Tuesday.

Jake Henderson, 28, posted a video using a racially abusive word to describe Patel after a Covid-19 pandemic in January this year and co-accused Robert Cumming, 26, who was among those who widely shared it online.

Both men admitted sending a grossly offensive message by a public communication network and will next appear at Mansfield

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/inaugurating-embassy-in-uae-israel-tells-region-were-here-to-stay-394875">Also Read | Inaugurating embassy in UAE, Israel tells region: 'We're here to stay'</a>

Magistrates' Court in Nottinghamshire, East Midlands region of England, on August 12 for sentencing. The duo remains on bail until the sentencing hearing.

The 50-second video was played in court, where Henderson can be heard saying: "As a white man, I won't be listening to people of colour."

Cumming then shared it along with the caption: "Haters gonna be hating" and four laughing emojis.

Prosecutor Daniel Church, appearing on behalf of the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), said the video was "motivated by hostility towards members of racial groups".

The court heard how members of the public were distressed by the comments linked with the video and feared its contents could incite racial hatred.

The duo was summonsed to court on May 29 and charged with sending a grossly offensive message by a public communication network, which comes with a custodial sentence or fine or both.

"Following complaints in relation to a video targeted at Home Secretary Priti Patel and posted on social media in January 2021, the CPS has authorised Nottinghamshire Police to charge Jake Henderson and Robert Cumming with sending a grossly offensive message by a public communication network,” Janine Smith, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East Midlands, said earlier this month.

"The function of the CPS is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges to a court to consider,” Smith said.

Two men who were charged with sending a grossly offensive message and accused of inciting "racial hatred" with a social media video targeting UK Home Secretary Priti Patel admitted to the charge in court on Tuesday.

Two men who were charged with sending a grossly offensive message and accused of inciting "racial hatred" with a social media video targeting UK Home Secretary Priti Patel admitted to the charge in court on Tuesday. Jake Henderson, 28, posted a video using a racially abusive word to describe Patel after a Covid-19 pandemic in January this year and co-accused Robert Cumming, 26, who was among those who widely shared it online. Both men admitted sending a grossly offensive message by a public communication network and will next appear at Mansfield Also Read | Inaugurating embassy in UAE, Israel tells region: 'We're here to stay' Magistrates' Court in Nottinghamshire, East Midlands region of England, on August 12 for sentencing. The duo remains on bail until the sentencing hearing. The 50-second video was played in court, where Henderson can be heard saying: "As a white man, I won't be listening to people of colour." Cumming then shared it along with the caption: "Haters gonna be hating" and four laughing emojis. Prosecutor Daniel Church, appearing on behalf of the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), said the video was "motivated by hostility towards members of racial groups". The court heard how members of the public were distressed by the comments linked with the video and feared its contents could incite racial hatred. The duo was summonsed to court on May 29 and charged with sending a grossly offensive message by a public communication network, which comes with a custodial sentence or fine or both. "Following complaints in relation to a video targeted at Home Secretary Priti Patel and posted on social media in January 2021, the CPS has authorised Nottinghamshire Police to charge Jake Henderson and Robert Cumming with sending a grossly offensive message by a public communication network,” Janine Smith, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East Midlands, said earlier this month. "The function of the CPS is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges to a court to consider,” Smith said.

Men who racially abused UK minister Priti Patel on social media now held

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel unveiled the government's new immigration policy, announcing sweeping reforms to streamline the way in which people enter into the United Kingdom.

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel announces 'wholesale' immigration reforms

UK's home secretary <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/unprecedented-india-uk-mobility-pact-overcomes-past-barriers-priti-patel-384327">Priti Patel </a>on Monday unveiled the government's new immigration policy while announcing "wholescale reforms".

The plan involves a digital visa regime with Patel asserting that the system should be "logical and fair."

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
🔴 WATCH LIVE: My keynote speech at <a href="https://twitter.com/WeAreBrightBlue?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@WeAreBrightBlue</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/britishfuture?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BritishFuture</a>'s <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ImmigrationWhatNext?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ImmigrationWhatNext</a> conference 👇🏽<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NewPlanForImmigration?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NewPlanForImmigration</a>🇬🇧 <a href="https://t.co/DznXbdiRFj">https://t.co/DznXbdiRFj</a>
— Priti Patel (@pritipatel) <a href="https://twitter.com/pritipatel/status/1396769833971245063?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 24, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"We are introducing a fully digital border system to make Great Britain&nbsp;safer," Priti Patel said.

Britain had withdrawn support to be governed by the EU in 2016 with Brexit which came into effect on January 1, 2021.

"It is a sheer fantasy that we can give homes to anyone who comes here, British nationality law has not changed since 1983 and is now filled with anomalies," the minister said.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
We’re introducing a fully digital border system to make 🇬🇧 safer: 
 
✅ Making it easier to ban serious &amp; dangerous foreign criminals with a US-style ETA. 
 
✅ Making the system easier to navigate for businesses. 
 
✅ Allowing us to count people in &amp; out of the UK for the 1st time. <a href="https://t.co/CZhVAk680G">pic.twitter.com/CZhVAk680G</a>
— Priti Patel (@pritipatel) <a href="https://twitter.com/pritipatel/status/1396776319275438080?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 24, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Priti Patel said her government was trying to make the system easier to navigate for businesses.&nbsp;

"The government is taking back control of immigration because there is such a thing as too much immigration," the minister said, adding, "I'm proud as a Briton and I'm proud of my parents and my British-Indian background."

The UK home secretary said that the new system will allow the government to ban serious and dangerous foreign <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/priti-patel-comes-under-fire-after-uk-loses-data-of-150000-criminals-356930">criminals</a> with a US-style ETA.

"In 2016, people withdrew their support from the broken immigration system, she said, asserting that the government is not anti-immigration."

According to the plan, the home secretary will be able to grant citizenship in "compelling" and "exceptional" circumstances where somebody has suffered historic unfairness out of their control.

"Our next plan is speeding of removal who have no legal right to live in the UK," Patel said.

Patel also mentioned BNO visas to be issued by the government to help Hong Kong.

"I have a message for those who seeking to disrupt our enforcement officers, we will not allow such disruption," the minister said.

UK's home secretary Priti Patel on Monday unveiled the government's new immigration policy while announcing "wholescale reforms". The plan involves a digital visa regime with Patel asserting that the system should be "logical and fair.

UK's home secretary Priti Patel on Monday unveiled the government's new immigration policy while announcing "wholescale reforms". The plan involves a digital visa regime with Patel asserting that the system should be "logical and fair." 🔴 WATCH LIVE: My keynote speech at @WeAreBrightBlue and @BritishFuture's #ImmigrationWhatNext conference 👇🏽#NewPlanForImmigration🇬🇧 https://t.co/DznXbdiRFj — Priti Patel (@pritipatel) May 24, 2021 × "We are introducing a fully digital border system to make Great Britain safer," Priti Patel said. Britain had withdrawn support to be governed by the EU in 2016 with Brexit which came into effect on January 1, 2021. "It is a sheer fantasy that we can give homes to anyone who comes here, British nationality law has not changed since 1983 and is now filled with anomalies," the minister said. We’re introducing a fully digital border system to make 🇬🇧 safer: ✅ Making it easier to ban serious & dangerous foreign criminals with a US-style ETA. ✅ Making the system easier to navigate for businesses. ✅ Allowing us to count people in & out of the UK for the 1st time. pic.twitter.com/CZhVAk680G — Priti Patel (@pritipatel) May 24, 2021 × Priti Patel said her government was trying to make the system easier to navigate for businesses. "The government is taking back control of immigration because there is such a thing as too much immigration," the minister said, adding, "I'm proud as a Briton and I'm proud of my parents and my British-Indian background." The UK home secretary said that the new system will allow the government to ban serious and dangerous foreign criminals with a US-style ETA. "In 2016, people withdrew their support from the broken immigration system, she said, asserting that the government is not anti-immigration." According to the plan, the home secretary will be able to grant citizenship in "compelling" and "exceptional" circumstances where somebody has suffered historic unfairness out of their control. "Our next plan is speeding of removal who have no legal right to live in the UK," Patel said. Patel also mentioned BNO visas to be issued by the government to help Hong Kong. "I have a message for those who seeking to disrupt our enforcement officers, we will not allow such disruption," the minister said.

'Government taking back control': UK home secretary Priti Patel unveils new immigration policy

The UK has adopted digital visa system from the US to keep a check on the actual number of people entering and leaving the country for the first time.

Digital visa&nbsp;has been unveiled for the people who will be entering the UK without a visa or immigration status. The visitors will now have to apply for an electronic travel authorisation (ETA). This will help determine the eligibility of the visitors, UK’s Home Secretary Priti Patel explained.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/unprecedented-india-uk-mobility-pact-overcomes-past-barriers-priti-patel-384327">Unprecedented India-UK mobility pact overcomes past barriers: Priti Patel</a>

"Our new fully digital border will provide the ability to count people in and out of the country, giving us control over who comes to the UK," Patel said.

This digital visa has been initiated after the Boris Johnson-led government was criticised for miscalculating the number of European citizens staying in the UK. The Home Office had estimated that nearly three million people from the EU lived in the UK and will be applying to the EU settlement scheme.

However, by April end, more than 5.4 million people had already applied for visa under the scheme and nearly 4.9 million had already been given the nod.

The government estimates nearly 144.7 million passengers arrived in the UK till June 2019, of which nearly 40 million had migrated from the European economic area and Switzerland.

The UK has adopted digital visa system from the US to keep a check on the actual number of people entering and leaving the country for the first time. Digital visa has been unveiled for the people who will be entering the UK without a visa or immigration status.

The UK has adopted digital visa system from the US to keep a check on the actual number of people entering and leaving the country for the first time. Digital visa has been unveiled for the people who will be entering the UK without a visa or immigration status. The visitors will now have to apply for an electronic travel authorisation (ETA). This will help determine the eligibility of the visitors, UK’s Home Secretary Priti Patel explained. Also read | Unprecedented India-UK mobility pact overcomes past barriers: Priti Patel "Our new fully digital border will provide the ability to count people in and out of the country, giving us control over who comes to the UK," Patel said. This digital visa has been initiated after the Boris Johnson-led government was criticised for miscalculating the number of European citizens staying in the UK. The Home Office had estimated that nearly three million people from the EU lived in the UK and will be applying to the EU settlement scheme. However, by April end, more than 5.4 million people had already applied for visa under the scheme and nearly 4.9 million had already been given the nod. The government estimates nearly 144.7 million passengers arrived in the UK till June 2019, of which nearly 40 million had migrated from the European economic area and Switzerland.

UK set to introduce 'digital visa' for travellers arriving in country

A new Migration and Mobility Partnership (MMP) signed between India and the UK recently is an "unprecedented" reciprocal agreement that will overcome the barriers around mobility and migration of the past, British Home Secretary Priti Patel has said.

The senior Indian-origin Cabinet minister, who signed the partnership's memorandum of understanding (MoU) with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in London last week, said the plan to have 3,000 young students and professionals a year access new work experience benefits in either country under the new pact will be up and running “within months”.

She highlighted that the move, which includes a new “bespoke” plan for 18 to 30-year-olds to apply for a 24-month stay in either country puts youth mobility at the heart of the bilateral relationship.

"This is a very significant unprecedented scheme that will provide additional benefits to both countries. It is highly symbolic," Patel told PTI in an interview on Monday.

"It shows how our two countries have really developed and advanced our relationship, in a purposeful and transformative way; which to be very candid, we did not have previously. Putting mobility at the heart of this relationship is a real change, a real pivot. We have spent too much time in the past speaking about mobility barriers,” she said.

Under the MMP, both sides have agreed to work towards an April 2022 timeline to bring in new systems in place, with work already underway with the High Commission in London and the Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi.

"We have worked at pace for this and we are in the process of finalising the timetable around this. We are not hanging around. We are literally now just putting dates on this," the minister said.

Dubbed as a first-of-its-kind agreement between the two countries, both governments agreed enhanced mobility provisions for young professional Indian and British citizens and swifter and more efficient returns of illegal migrants by accelerating timescales for removals, by committing appropriate resources to facilitate returns.

"We also signed an agreement linked to illegal migration, which is a huge benefit for India as well because obviously there are certain individuals that come in that India wants returned," said Patel, in reference to extradition cases.

The new youth mobility route adds to previous announcements under Britain's post-Brexit points-based immigration system, which the minister said was already “benefitting Indians hugely” as the new rules came in force from earlier this year with the UK no longer bound by European Union laws.

“The whole purpose of the points-based system was to do away with the discrimination that India were at a the disadvantage under previous systems. I have squared that circle in less than 12 months. In less than two years since becoming Home Secretary, I have really moved the needle on creating a new bespoke and reciprocal route for young professionals from the UK and in India to really become part of that professional experience and exchange,” said Patel.

She credited the leadership of the two Prime Ministers – Boris Johnson and Narendra Modi – as well as her counterpart, Home Minister Amit Shah, for driving the mobility agenda forward.

"Through the leadership of the Prime Minister of the UK and Prime Minister of India we have been able to have a Home Secretary and a Home Minister in India in Amit Bhai, driving this agenda forward. It is big, it is significant and it's a landmark agreement that will provide new opportunities to thousands of young people in the UK and in India seeking to live, work and really benefit from each other's cultures but also professional opportunities that both our countries have to offer,” said the Gujarati-origin minister.

"It's significant because over decades Britain has been enriched with the diaspora community and the links we have with India but at the same time, the Migration and Mobility Partnership builds upon the new benefits of the points-based immigration system will give to India through the exchanges of skilled migration,” she added.&nbsp;

A new Migration and Mobility Partnership (MMP) signed between India and the UK recently is an "unprecedented" reciprocal agreement that will overcome the barriers around mobility and migration of the past, British Home Secretary Priti Patel has said.

A new Migration and Mobility Partnership (MMP) signed between India and the UK recently is an "unprecedented" reciprocal agreement that will overcome the barriers around mobility and migration of the past, British Home Secretary Priti Patel has said. The senior Indian-origin Cabinet minister, who signed the partnership's memorandum of understanding (MoU) with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in London last week, said the plan to have 3,000 young students and professionals a year access new work experience benefits in either country under the new pact will be up and running “within months”. She highlighted that the move, which includes a new “bespoke” plan for 18 to 30-year-olds to apply for a 24-month stay in either country puts youth mobility at the heart of the bilateral relationship. "This is a very significant unprecedented scheme that will provide additional benefits to both countries. It is highly symbolic," Patel told PTI in an interview on Monday. "It shows how our two countries have really developed and advanced our relationship, in a purposeful and transformative way; which to be very candid, we did not have previously. Putting mobility at the heart of this relationship is a real change, a real pivot. We have spent too much time in the past speaking about mobility barriers,” she said. Under the MMP, both sides have agreed to work towards an April 2022 timeline to bring in new systems in place, with work already underway with the High Commission in London and the Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi. "We have worked at pace for this and we are in the process of finalising the timetable around this. We are not hanging around. We are literally now just putting dates on this," the minister said. Dubbed as a first-of-its-kind agreement between the two countries, both governments agreed enhanced mobility provisions for young professional Indian and British citizens and swifter and more efficient returns of illegal migrants by accelerating timescales for removals, by committing appropriate resources to facilitate returns. "We also signed an agreement linked to illegal migration, which is a huge benefit for India as well because obviously there are certain individuals that come in that India wants returned," said Patel, in reference to extradition cases. The new youth mobility route adds to previous announcements under Britain's post-Brexit points-based immigration system, which the minister said was already “benefitting Indians hugely” as the new rules came in force from earlier this year with the UK no longer bound by European Union laws. “The whole purpose of the points-based system was to do away with the discrimination that India were at a the disadvantage under previous systems. I have squared that circle in less than 12 months. In less than two years since becoming Home Secretary, I have really moved the needle on creating a new bespoke and reciprocal route for young professionals from the UK and in India to really become part of that professional experience and exchange,” said Patel. She credited the leadership of the two Prime Ministers – Boris Johnson and Narendra Modi – as well as her counterpart, Home Minister Amit Shah, for driving the mobility agenda forward. "Through the leadership of the Prime Minister of the UK and Prime Minister of India we have been able to have a Home Secretary and a Home Minister in India in Amit Bhai, driving this agenda forward. It is big, it is significant and it's a landmark agreement that will provide new opportunities to thousands of young people in the UK and in India seeking to live, work and really benefit from each other's cultures but also professional opportunities that both our countries have to offer,” said the Gujarati-origin minister. "It's significant because over decades Britain has been enriched with the diaspora community and the links we have with India but at the same time, the Migration and Mobility Partnership builds upon the new benefits of the points-based immigration system will give to India through the exchanges of skilled migration,” she added.

Unprecedented India-UK mobility pact overcomes past barriers: Priti Patel

Indian Foreign Affairs Minister Jaishankar met UK Home Secretary Priti Patel on Tuesday and signed the migration and mobility partnership agreement to facilitate legal travel and encourage talent flows.

Indian FM Jaishankar meets UK Home Secy Priti Patel, signs migration & mobility agreement

More than 60 British lawmakers have written to interior minister Priti Patel calling for protests to be allowed in England during lockdown.&nbsp;

Under England's coronavirus rules, it is unlawful for groups to gather for protests and police warned people on Saturday not to head to central London for planned demonstrations, including by anti-lockdown campaigners.&nbsp;

Police were criticised for using heavy-handed tactics on March 13 to break up an outdoor vigil for 33-year-old Sarah Everard. A police officer has been charged with her kidnap and murder.&nbsp;

Further protests followed, fuelled by anger over government plans to tighten the law on demonstrations.&nbsp;

The group of lawmakers, including Conservative Member of Parliament Steve Baker, and Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, said that protest should not be a criminal offence.&nbsp;

"We call on you to expressly exempt protests from restrictions on gatherings," they said in the letter, which was organised by campaign groups, Liberty and Big Brother Watch.&nbsp;

The interior ministry, known as the Home Office, said in response that the Covid-19 stay at home order remains in place until March 29, and once it ends, protests can resume subject to agreed social-distancing measures.&nbsp;

"While we are still in a pandemic, we continue to urge people to avoid mass gatherings, in line with wider coronavirus restrictions," a spokeswoman said.&nbsp;

Police said that a significant operation will be in place in London to engage with people breaching Covid-19 regulations, adding that any protesters will be encouraged to return home or could face fines or arrest.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

More than 60 British lawmakers have written to interior minister Priti Patel calling for protests to be allowed in England during lockdown. Under England's coronavirus rules, it is unlawful for groups to gather for protests and police warned people on Saturday not to head to central London for planned demonstrations, including by anti-lockdown campaigners.

More than 60 British lawmakers have written to interior minister Priti Patel calling for protests to be allowed in England during lockdown. Under England's coronavirus rules, it is unlawful for groups to gather for protests and police warned people on Saturday not to head to central London for planned demonstrations, including by anti-lockdown campaigners. Police were criticised for using heavy-handed tactics on March 13 to break up an outdoor vigil for 33-year-old Sarah Everard. A police officer has been charged with her kidnap and murder. Further protests followed, fuelled by anger over government plans to tighten the law on demonstrations. The group of lawmakers, including Conservative Member of Parliament Steve Baker, and Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, said that protest should not be a criminal offence. "We call on you to expressly exempt protests from restrictions on gatherings," they said in the letter, which was organised by campaign groups, Liberty and Big Brother Watch. The interior ministry, known as the Home Office, said in response that the Covid-19 stay at home order remains in place until March 29, and once it ends, protests can resume subject to agreed social-distancing measures. "While we are still in a pandemic, we continue to urge people to avoid mass gatherings, in line with wider coronavirus restrictions," a spokeswoman said. Police said that a significant operation will be in place in London to engage with people breaching Covid-19 regulations, adding that any protesters will be encouraged to return home or could face fines or arrest. (With inputs from agencies)

Over 60 lawmakers call for protests to be allowed in England during lockdown 

The governments of Gibraltar and Isle of Man have said that they will not house asylum seekers on behalf of the United Kingdom.

British Home Secretary&nbsp;Priti&nbsp;Patel is&nbsp;mulling plans to send people to processing centres abroad to overhaul the immigration system, according to the Daily Mail and the Times.

She is expected to publish details next week of the scheme in which people arriving via illegal methods, such as crossing the English Channel in small boats would be removed to a third country to have any claim dealt with.

Gibraltar Chief Minister&nbsp;Fabian&nbsp;Picardo&nbsp;said Thursday he did not have any discussion with the United Kingdom and had written to Patel that the reports were ''groundless'' and had ''no foundation.''

“Immigration is an area of my responsibility as chief minister under the Gibraltar constitution and I can confirm that this issue has not been raised with me at any level. I would have made clear this is not an area on which we believe we can assist the UK,” he added.

Meanwhile, the Isle of Man issued a statement that it is ''self-governing,'' and&nbsp;the UK government would not be able to open any sort of processing centre on the island without consent. The UK government has not contacted the Isle of Man government about any such proposal.”

Earlier, The Guardian quoted a UK Home Office source saying,&nbsp;“Whilst people are dying making perilous journeys we would be irresponsible if we didn’t consider every avenue.”

The latest proposals have been criticised by immigration experts who called them ''ineffective'' and ''inhumane.''

According to the chief executive of the British Red Cross, Mike Adamson&nbsp;“Offshoring the UK’s asylum system will do nothing to address the reasons people take dangerous journeys in the first place and will almost certainly have grave humanitarian consequences.”

“From the children rescued by the Kindertransport to those displaced by the decade-long conflict in Syria, providing sanctuary in the heart of our communities is what’s needed for people fleeing conflict and persecution and should be a key feature of global Britain as a force for good. Being housed in facilities offshore is the opposite of that.”

The governments of Gibraltar and Isle of Man have said that they will not house asylum seekers on behalf of the United Kingdom. British Home Secretary Priti Patel is mulling plans to send people to processing centres abroad to overhaul the immigration system, according to the Daily Mail and the Times.

The governments of Gibraltar and Isle of Man have said that they will not house asylum seekers on behalf of the United Kingdom. British Home Secretary Priti Patel is mulling plans to send people to processing centres abroad to overhaul the immigration system, according to the Daily Mail and the Times. She is expected to publish details next week of the scheme in which people arriving via illegal methods, such as crossing the English Channel in small boats would be removed to a third country to have any claim dealt with. Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said Thursday he did not have any discussion with the United Kingdom and had written to Patel that the reports were ''groundless'' and had ''no foundation.'' “Immigration is an area of my responsibility as chief minister under the Gibraltar constitution and I can confirm that this issue has not been raised with me at any level. I would have made clear this is not an area on which we believe we can assist the UK,” he added. Meanwhile, the Isle of Man issued a statement that it is ''self-governing,'' and the UK government would not be able to open any sort of processing centre on the island without consent. The UK government has not contacted the Isle of Man government about any such proposal.” Earlier, The Guardian quoted a UK Home Office source saying, “Whilst people are dying making perilous journeys we would be irresponsible if we didn’t consider every avenue.” The latest proposals have been criticised by immigration experts who called them ''ineffective'' and ''inhumane.'' According to the chief executive of the British Red Cross, Mike Adamson “Offshoring the UK’s asylum system will do nothing to address the reasons people take dangerous journeys in the first place and will almost certainly have grave humanitarian consequences.” “From the children rescued by the Kindertransport to those displaced by the decade-long conflict in Syria, providing sanctuary in the heart of our communities is what’s needed for people fleeing conflict and persecution and should be a key feature of global Britain as a force for good. Being housed in facilities offshore is the opposite of that.”

Gibraltar, Isle of Man rule out housing asylum seekers for Britain

priti-patel

Priti Patel, News on Priti Patel, stories on Priti Patel, articles on Priti Patel, Priti Patel stories at Wion, Priti Patel news, Priti Patel latest news

priti patel