On the first anniversary of Operation Sindoor, the Indian Air Force has released a special commemorative video highlighting the mission, its strategic significance, and the strength of India’s air power. The video showcases key moments, operational readiness, and the armed forces’ capabilities, marking a year since the landmark operation. Stay tuned for more defence updates and exclusive coverage.


Operation Sindoor Anniversary: IAF Shares Special Video On First Anniversary

New Delhi: In February, Indians and Pakistanis met in Doha for Track 2 talks even as, officially, the ties between the two countries remain frosty. The Doha round was not the first in recent months, but it comes at a time when ties remain cold, as India remains concerned over cross-border terrorism supported by Pakistan in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack.&nbsp;For India and Pakistan, the backchannel track 2 has been continuing for decades. At one point, nearly 20 such dialogues ran simultaneously.&nbsp;Inputs from these help make an assessment when ties remain snapped, as they are currently. No breakthrough is expected from such engagement, but it is seen as a channel of informal communication away from public glare. No press releases are issued, no statements are made after these meetings, and above all, no one will confirm or deny them.&nbsp;The Neemrana Dialogue has been, in the past, one of the longest-running dialogues, bringing together voices from both sides.&nbsp;Track 2 is not new. The term, coined in 1981 by American diplomat Joseph Montville, describes informal, non-structured talks between non-officials, often former officials, journalists, business leaders, and civil society voices. The goal is to build trust, test ideas, and create space for understanding, away from the glare of politics and media.&nbsp;Unlike Track 1, formal government-to-government negotiations like the Camp David Accords, Track 2 offers deniability and flexibility. A hybrid version, Track 1.5, mixes serving officials (acting unofficially) with outsiders. This pattern repeats globally when relations sour. For example, the Oslo Accords, the initial phase (1993), when unofficial meetings in Norway between Israeli academics and PLO representatives took place.&nbsp;After the deadly 2020 Galwan Valley clash, India and China froze much official contact. But Track 2 exchanges helped keep lines open. High-level signals of thaw followed: Prime Minister Narendra Modi met President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the SCO summit in Tianjin in 2025. Direct flights resumed in October 2025 after five years. Cross-border trade mechanisms and people-to-people contacts are slowly returning. Xi may even visit India for the BRICS summit later this year.&nbsp;In 2022, when war broke out in Ukraine, India quietly engaged in Track 2 and Track 1.5 forums with Europeans, Russians, and Ukrainians. Civil society groups and former officials explored humanitarian solutions and de-escalation ideas while New Delhi maintained its public stance of strategic autonomy.&nbsp;Even with Canada, when ties were at a low point after accusations over the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, pragmatism prevailed after track 1.5 diplomacy. Meetings between PM Modi and Prime Minister Mark Carney at the G7 in June 2025 and G20 in November helped stabilise ties. High commissioners returned. Carney’s visit to India in early 2026 delivered concrete outcomes: talks on a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) to push bilateral trade towards $50 billion by 2030, plus cooperation in energy, critical minerals, defence and nuclear issues. Political differences were set aside for economic and strategic gains.&nbsp;From Pakistan to China, from Canada to conflicts, Track 2 diplomacy has proved its worth in a fractured world. It does not replace official talks but provides an opportunity to exchange notes and sometimes be part of heated debate, but above all it also provides space for quiet conversations. In some cases, it may provide a channel of communication; in other cases, seeds for future breakthroughs.

After the deadly 2020 Galwan Valley clash, India and China froze much official contact. But Track 2 exchanges helped keep lines open. High-level signals of thaw followed: Prime Minister Narendra Modi met President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the SCO summit in Tianjin in 2025.

New Delhi: In February, Indians and Pakistanis met in Doha for Track 2 talks even as, officially, the ties between the two countries remain frosty. The Doha round was not the first in recent months, but it comes at a time when ties remain cold, as India remains concerned over cross-border terrorism supported by Pakistan in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. For India and Pakistan, the backchannel track 2 has been continuing for decades. At one point, nearly 20 such dialogues ran simultaneously. Inputs from these help make an assessment when ties remain snapped, as they are currently. No breakthrough is expected from such engagement, but it is seen as a channel of informal communication away from public glare. No press releases are issued, no statements are made after these meetings, and above all, no one will confirm or deny them. The Neemrana Dialogue has been, in the past, one of the longest-running dialogues, bringing together voices from both sides. Track 2 is not new. The term, coined in 1981 by American diplomat Joseph Montville, describes informal, non-structured talks between non-officials, often former officials, journalists, business leaders, and civil society voices. The goal is to build trust, test ideas, and create space for understanding, away from the glare of politics and media. Unlike Track 1, formal government-to-government negotiations like the Camp David Accords, Track 2 offers deniability and flexibility. A hybrid version, Track 1.5, mixes serving officials (acting unofficially) with outsiders. This pattern repeats globally when relations sour. For example, the Oslo Accords, the initial phase (1993), when unofficial meetings in Norway between Israeli academics and PLO representatives took place. After the deadly 2020 Galwan Valley clash, India and China froze much official contact. But Track 2 exchanges helped keep lines open. High-level signals of thaw followed: Prime Minister Narendra Modi met President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the SCO summit in Tianjin in 2025. Direct flights resumed in October 2025 after five years. Cross-border trade mechanisms and people-to-people contacts are slowly returning. Xi may even visit India for the BRICS summit later this year. In 2022, when war broke out in Ukraine, India quietly engaged in Track 2 and Track 1.5 forums with Europeans, Russians, and Ukrainians. Civil society groups and former officials explored humanitarian solutions and de-escalation ideas while New Delhi maintained its public stance of strategic autonomy. Even with Canada, when ties were at a low point after accusations over the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, pragmatism prevailed after track 1.5 diplomacy. Meetings between PM Modi and Prime Minister Mark Carney at the G7 in June 2025 and G20 in November helped stabilise ties. High commissioners returned. Carney’s visit to India in early 2026 delivered concrete outcomes: talks on a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) to push bilateral trade towards $50 billion by 2030, plus cooperation in energy, critical minerals, defence and nuclear issues. Political differences were set aside for economic and strategic gains. From Pakistan to China, from Canada to conflicts, Track 2 diplomacy has proved its worth in a fractured world. It does not replace official talks but provides an opportunity to exchange notes and sometimes be part of heated debate, but above all it also provides space for quiet conversations. In some cases, it may provide a channel of communication; in other cases, seeds for future breakthroughs.

After the deadly 2020 Galwan Valley clash, India and China froze much official contact. But Track 2 exchanges helped keep lines open. High-level signals of thaw followed: Prime Minister Narendra Modi met President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the SCO summit in Tianjin in 2025.

Track 2 channels active between India and Pakistan even as official relations remain in freeze

Pakistan's spy agency has launched a sophisticated propaganda drive, according to intelligence sources, ahead of the first anniversary of last year's deadly Pahalgam terror attack.&nbsp;The campaign, orchestrated by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), accuses India of planning a "false flag" operation in the coming days. It claims Indian authorities might stage an attack and blame Pakistan, possibly by using Pakistani nationals held in Indian jails. The narrative has been swiftly picked up by major mainstream Pakistani outlets, and amplified across social media.&nbsp;Intelligence inputs suggest the story was drafted by ISI's Director General-Media, Major General Muhammad Mushtaq Ali. It was then planted in newspapers before the Pakistan Army's X Corps and the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) took over wider dissemination.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-thanks-azerbaijan-for-iran-evacuation-both-agree-to-launch-political-consultations-1775061714836">India thanks Azerbaijan for Iran evacuation; both agree to launch political consultations</a>&nbsp;Lieutenant General Amer Ahsan Nawaz, commander of X Corps, and ISPR's DG-Bravo, Major General Zulfiqar Ali Bhatti, are said to have overseen the push, using coordinated bot networks and affiliated accounts to spread the message rapidly.&nbsp;This timing is no coincidence. It comes just before the anniversary of the April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack, which killed dozens, mostly tourists. Indian officials point out a similar pattern last year, Pakistan floated comparable "false flag" warnings weeks before the terror attack. After the attack, two of the three terrorists neutralised were found carrying Pakistani Computerised National Identity Cards (CNICs), undermining Islamabad's denials.&nbsp;In the 11 months since Pahalgam, Indian security forces have eliminated 34 Pakistani terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir, according to sources. Yet more than 40 others linked to groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed remain active. Agencies are also tracking recent meetings between ISI officers, including Punjab Sector Commander Brigadier Rizwan Sharif, and operatives from these outfits.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/forces-minutes-from-sea-strike-on-pakistan-during-operation-sindoor-indian-navy-chief-admiral-tripathi-1775057204584">Forces minutes from sea strike on Pakistan during Operation Sindoor: Indian Navy Chief Admiral Tripathi</a>&nbsp;What stands out in this latest episode is the highly institutionalised nature of Pakistan's information warfare. Far from ad-hoc responses, the machinery involves the ISI's Analysis Wing working with media and technical directors to craft unified narratives. ISPR's "Bravo Division" executes the plans, while those recruited through a long-running programme, now reportedly running batches of over 8,000, help generate and push content.&nbsp;Regulatory bodies like PEMRA and the PTA help control the domestic information space.&nbsp;Indian security agencies remain on high alert, viewing the campaign as part of a hybrid strategy that blends psychological operations with potential ground threats. They emphasise that such pre-emptive narratives aim to shape global perceptions and provide cover if terror attack happens.Pakistan has long involved in cross border terrorism attacks in India, from 2001 Parliament terror attack to 26/11 Mumbai terror attack to last year' Pahalgam terror attack.

Pakistan’s intelligence agency is alleged to be pushing a coordinated propaganda campaign ahead of the Pahalgam attack anniversary, claiming India may stage a ‘false flag’ operation. 

Pakistan's spy agency has launched a sophisticated propaganda drive, according to intelligence sources, ahead of the first anniversary of last year's deadly Pahalgam terror attack. The campaign, orchestrated by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), accuses India of planning a "false flag" operation in the coming days. It claims Indian authorities might stage an attack and blame Pakistan, possibly by using Pakistani nationals held in Indian jails. The narrative has been swiftly picked up by major mainstream Pakistani outlets, and amplified across social media. Intelligence inputs suggest the story was drafted by ISI's Director General-Media, Major General Muhammad Mushtaq Ali. It was then planted in newspapers before the Pakistan Army's X Corps and the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) took over wider dissemination. ALSO READ: India thanks Azerbaijan for Iran evacuation; both agree to launch political consultations Lieutenant General Amer Ahsan Nawaz, commander of X Corps, and ISPR's DG-Bravo, Major General Zulfiqar Ali Bhatti, are said to have overseen the push, using coordinated bot networks and affiliated accounts to spread the message rapidly. This timing is no coincidence. It comes just before the anniversary of the April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack, which killed dozens, mostly tourists. Indian officials point out a similar pattern last year, Pakistan floated comparable "false flag" warnings weeks before the terror attack. After the attack, two of the three terrorists neutralised were found carrying Pakistani Computerised National Identity Cards (CNICs), undermining Islamabad's denials. In the 11 months since Pahalgam, Indian security forces have eliminated 34 Pakistani terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir, according to sources. Yet more than 40 others linked to groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed remain active. Agencies are also tracking recent meetings between ISI officers, including Punjab Sector Commander Brigadier Rizwan Sharif, and operatives from these outfits. ALSO READ: Forces minutes from sea strike on Pakistan during Operation Sindoor: Indian Navy Chief Admiral Tripathi What stands out in this latest episode is the highly institutionalised nature of Pakistan's information warfare. Far from ad-hoc responses, the machinery involves the ISI's Analysis Wing working with media and technical directors to craft unified narratives. ISPR's "Bravo Division" executes the plans, while those recruited through a long-running programme, now reportedly running batches of over 8,000, help generate and push content. Regulatory bodies like PEMRA and the PTA help control the domestic information space. Indian security agencies remain on high alert, viewing the campaign as part of a hybrid strategy that blends psychological operations with potential ground threats. They emphasise that such pre-emptive narratives aim to shape global perceptions and provide cover if terror attack happens. Pakistan has long involved in cross border terrorism attacks in India, from 2001 Parliament terror attack to 26/11 Mumbai terror attack to last year' Pahalgam terror attack.

Pakistan’s intelligence agency is alleged to be pushing a coordinated propaganda campaign ahead of the Pahalgam attack anniversary, claiming India may stage a ‘false flag’ operation.&nbsp;

Pakistan pushes 'false flag' narrative before Pahalgam terror attack anniversary; Indian Intel on high alert

India on Monday (Mar 16) struck a careful but pointed note at the United Nations, calling for a fight against religious discrimination that is not limited to one faith. Speaking at an event jointly organised by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the United Nations Alliance of Civilisations (UNAOC) on International Day to Combat Islamophobia, Indian Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni took a pointed dig at Pakistan. Without naming the nation, Parvathaneni noted that "India's western neighbour is an excellent example of fabricating imaginative tales of Islamophobia in their neighbourhood".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/nda-sweeps-rajya-sabha-seats-in-bihar-odisha-haryana-sees-close-contest-1773714960284">NDA sweeps Rajya Sabha seats in Bihar, Odisha; Haryana sees close contest</a><h2>International Day to Combat Islamophobia</h2>Speaking at the event, Parvathaneni said New Delhi condemns violence carried out in the name of any religion, not just one. "My delegation strongly condemns violence and hatred in the name of religion, regardless of the religion under question," he said, extending greetings for Ramadan.Highlighting India's religious diversity, the Indian envoy noted that India was a country where multiple religions coexist and that it was the birthplace of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism.Pointing to India's own experience, he noted, "India, more than any other country, is acutely aware of the need for a world free from religious discrimination".The idea of “Sarva Dharma Sambhava” — equal respect for all faiths — was central to the Indian constitution, he added.<h2>Warning against politicising faith</h2>At the same time, Parvathaneni warned that the politicisation of religion. He said that doing so risks deepening divisions rather than resolving grievances. "History bears repeated witness to how the politicisation of religion does not solve and resolve grievances; however well-intentioned, they risk lending legitimacy to precisely this kind of selective, polarising narratives that breed further division," he said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-slams-uscirf-report-as-biased-rejects-allegations-on-religious-freedom-1773691146838">India slams USCIRF report as 'biased', rejects allegations on religious freedom</a><h2>A pointed remark at Pakistan</h2>Without naming Pakistan directly, the envoy criticised what he called “imaginative tales” of Islamophobia emerging from India’s western neighbour. He questioned how issues like the treatment of the Ahmadiyya community or the handling of Afghan refugees would be described in that context."One wonders what would brutal repression of Ahmadiyyas in this country be termed, or the large-scale refoulement of the helpless Afghans or air-bombing campaigns in this Holy Month of Ramadan?" he said.Parvathaneni also pushed back against narratives portraying India as hostile to Muslims. With more than 200 million Muslims, he noted, India is home to one of the largest Muslim populations in the world. "The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, which our western neighbour has systematically attempted to weaponise against India, has repeatedly made false and baseless allegations against my country," he said."Muslims in India, including those in Jammu and Kashmir, elect their own representatives to speak for them," added the Indian ambassador to the UN. "The only 'phobia' evident here appears to be directed against the multicultural and peaceful coexistence that all communities in India enjoy, including Muslim communities," he said. Concluding his address, he reaffirmed India's "commitment to a world free from religious hatred and violence, in all its forms". &nbsp;

In a blistering take-down at the UN, India called out the "imaginative tales" of Islamophobia spun by its western neighbour, Pakistan. Indian Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni exposed the hypocrisy of nations that "weaponise" religious narratives while committing “brutal repression”.

India on Monday (Mar 16) struck a careful but pointed note at the United Nations, calling for a fight against religious discrimination that is not limited to one faith. Speaking at an event jointly organised by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the United Nations Alliance of Civilisations (UNAOC) on International Day to Combat Islamophobia, Indian Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni took a pointed dig at Pakistan. Without naming the nation, Parvathaneni noted that "India's western neighbour is an excellent example of fabricating imaginative tales of Islamophobia in their neighbourhood". Also read | NDA sweeps Rajya Sabha seats in Bihar, Odisha; Haryana sees close contest International Day to Combat Islamophobia Speaking at the event, Parvathaneni said New Delhi condemns violence carried out in the name of any religion, not just one. "My delegation strongly condemns violence and hatred in the name of religion, regardless of the religion under question," he said, extending greetings for Ramadan. Highlighting India's religious diversity, the Indian envoy noted that India was a country where multiple religions coexist and that it was the birthplace of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism. Pointing to India's own experience, he noted, "India, more than any other country, is acutely aware of the need for a world free from religious discrimination". The idea of “Sarva Dharma Sambhava” — equal respect for all faiths — was central to the Indian constitution, he added. Warning against politicising faith At the same time, Parvathaneni warned that the politicisation of religion. He said that doing so risks deepening divisions rather than resolving grievances. "History bears repeated witness to how the politicisation of religion does not solve and resolve grievances; however well-intentioned, they risk lending legitimacy to precisely this kind of selective, polarising narratives that breed further division," he said. Also read | India slams USCIRF report as 'biased', rejects allegations on religious freedom A pointed remark at Pakistan Without naming Pakistan directly, the envoy criticised what he called “imaginative tales” of Islamophobia emerging from India’s western neighbour. He questioned how issues like the treatment of the Ahmadiyya community or the handling of Afghan refugees would be described in that context. "One wonders what would brutal repression of Ahmadiyyas in this country be termed, or the large-scale refoulement of the helpless Afghans or air-bombing campaigns in this Holy Month of Ramadan?" he said. Parvathaneni also pushed back against narratives portraying India as hostile to Muslims. With more than 200 million Muslims, he noted, India is home to one of the largest Muslim populations in the world. "The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, which our western neighbour has systematically attempted to weaponise against India, has repeatedly made false and baseless allegations against my country," he said. "Muslims in India, including those in Jammu and Kashmir, elect their own representatives to speak for them," added the Indian ambassador to the UN. "The only 'phobia' evident here appears to be directed against the multicultural and peaceful coexistence that all communities in India enjoy, including Muslim communities," he said. Concluding his address, he reaffirmed India's "commitment to a world free from religious hatred and violence, in all its forms".

In a blistering take-down at the UN, India called out the "imaginative tales" of Islamophobia spun by its western neighbour, Pakistan. Indian Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni exposed the hypocrisy of nations that "weaponise" religious narratives while committing “brutal repression”.

'What about Ahmadiyyas?': India slams Pakistan at UN for 'fabricating imaginative tales of Islamophobia'

India on Wednesday (Feb 25) slammed Pakistan at the 61st Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, with a pointed remark noting that Islamabad must be "hallucinating or living in la la land" if it believes development in Jammu and Kashmir was not real. The comment came during India’s Right to Reply at the session in Geneva, where New Delhi pushed back against allegations raised by Pakistan and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).<h2>India slams Pak's ‘hallucinations’, reiterates Kashmir an ‘integral and inalienable’ part of territory</h2>India's representative Anupama Singh accused Islamabad of recycling propaganda and said the OIC had allowed itself to become an "echo chamber" for one member state. "We categorically reject these allegations," she said, adding that Pakistan’s repeated claims “reek of envy.”Singh also reiterated India's position on Jammu and Kashmir and said that it "was, is, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India." She said the region's accession in 1947 was "completely legal and irrevocable," grounded in the Indian Independence Act and international norms."The only outstanding dispute regarding this region is the illegal occupation of Indian territories by Pakistan," she noted, calling on Islamabad to vacate areas under its control.Watch what India's representative Anupama Singh said here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Pakistan lives in la la land, Indian Diplomat Anupama Singh&#39;s sharp rebuke to Pakistan at UN Human Rights Council Singh also pointed to Jammu and Kashmir&#39;s development budget being bigger than Pakistan&#39;s IMF bailout <a href="https://t.co/dLB6ItcRCX">pic.twitter.com/dLB6ItcRCX</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/2026872553894207682?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Development versus crisis</h2>Singh's sharpest remark came when she pointed to recent infrastructure projects in the region, including the Chenab Rail Bridge, the world's highest railway bridge, inaugurated last year."If the Chenab Rail Bridge, the world's highest bridge, inaugurated in Jammu and Kashmir last year, is fake, then Pakistan must be hallucinating or living in the 'La-la-land'" Singh said.Contrasting what she described as Jammu and Kashmir's expanding development budget with Pakistan’s economic troubles, she then claimed that the Union Territory's development budget was "more than double the recent bailout package", the size of Pakistan’s recent IMF bailout package.Responding to Pakistan's criticism of India’s democratic record in the region, Singh said it was "hard to take lectures on democracy from a country where civilian governments rarely complete their terms." She pointed to voter participation in recent elections as evidence that people in Jammu and Kashmir have "rejected the ideology of terrorism and violence" for development.Singh also accused Pakistan of continuing to back militancy in the region, calling it "relentless state-sponsored terrorism."&nbsp;

India hit back at Pakistan at the UN Human Rights Council, saying Islamabad must be “hallucinating” if it denies development in Jammu and Kashmir. Representative Anupama Singh rejected OIC-backed claims and reaffirmed J&K was an integral part of India.

India on Wednesday (Feb 25) slammed Pakistan at the 61st Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, with a pointed remark noting that Islamabad must be "hallucinating or living in la la land" if it believes development in Jammu and Kashmir was not real. The comment came during India’s Right to Reply at the session in Geneva, where New Delhi pushed back against allegations raised by Pakistan and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). India slams Pak's ‘hallucinations’, reiterates Kashmir an ‘integral and inalienable’ part of territory India's representative Anupama Singh accused Islamabad of recycling propaganda and said the OIC had allowed itself to become an "echo chamber" for one member state. "We categorically reject these allegations," she said, adding that Pakistan’s repeated claims “reek of envy.” Singh also reiterated India's position on Jammu and Kashmir and said that it "was, is, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India." She said the region's accession in 1947 was "completely legal and irrevocable," grounded in the Indian Independence Act and international norms. "The only outstanding dispute regarding this region is the illegal occupation of Indian territories by Pakistan," she noted, calling on Islamabad to vacate areas under its control. Watch what India's representative Anupama Singh said here:

India hit back at Pakistan at the UN Human Rights Council, saying Islamabad must be “hallucinating” if it denies development in Jammu and Kashmir. Representative Anupama Singh rejected OIC-backed claims and reaffirmed J&amp;K was an integral part of India.

India at UNHRC says Pakistan’s claims ‘reek of envy,’ notes Islamabad ‘living in la la land’ | Video

US President Donald Trump has claimed that during last year’s military escalation between India and Pakistan, as many as 11 jets were shot down — a figure he repeated while asserting he helped broker a ceasefire by threatening trade penalties. India has consistently rejected any third‑party mediation in the conflict, saying de‑escalation was agreed directly between the two militaries.


Donald Trump Says 11 Jets Shot Down During India-Pak Hostilities Last Year 

The ICC T20 World Cup is exactly five days away, but the most highly anticipated match of the tournament might not even take place. The Pakistan government says the national team will boycott the clash against India, but the story is far from over, as the ICC has issued a warning to Pakistan.


T20 World Cup: What Pakistan Could Lose If It Boycotts India 

Pakistani security forces on Sunday (Feb 1) claimed they have killed more than 100 “Indian-backed terrorists” in sweeping counterterrorism operations across Balochistan. However, the nation did not share any proof to back the claim that the "terrorists" had Indian links. These counterterrorism operations come a day after a wave of deadly coordinated suicide and gun attacks left dozens of civilians and security personnel dead.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/former-uk-ambassador-to-us-peter-mandelson-quits-labour-party-after-compromising-undies-pic-from-epstein-files-goes-viral-1769998928340">Ex-UK envoy seen in compromising undies pic in Epstein files, quits Labour Party</a><h2>Major operations after deadly attacks</h2>As per reports, the raids began early Saturday (Jan 31) at multiple locations in the southwestern province of Balochistan, a day after coordinated suicide bombings and gun assaults killed 33 people, most of them civilians.According to provincial authorities, at least 18 civilians, including five women and three children, and 15 members of the security forces were killed during the violence over the past 40 hours.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/more-than-200-killed-in-intense-clashes-between-separatists-and-army-in-pakistan-s-balochistan-1769957610746">Over 200 killed as separatists, army clash in Pakistan’s Balochistan</a><h2>Fitna al-Hindustan</h2>Balochistan Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti, as cited by ABC News, told reporters in Quetta that Pakistani troops and police had killed 145 militants belonging to what the government calls “Fitna al-Hindustan”, a term it uses for the allegedly India-backed, banned Baloch Liberation Army (BLA).“The bodies of these 145 killed terrorists are in our custody, and some of them are Afghan nationals,” Bugti said, describing the toll as the highest in decades.He claimed the attackers had planned to take hostages and storm government offices in Quetta’s high-security zone, but were stopped before reaching the city centre. “We were aware of their plans, and our forces were prepared,” he said.<h2>Pakistan's unsubstantiated accusations against India and Afghanistan</h2>Bugti repeatedly accused India and Afghanistan of backing the assailants, alleging that senior BLA leaders were operating from Afghan territory. Both New Delhi and Kabul deny the claims.He said Afghanistan’s Taliban had pledged under the 2020 Doha agreement not to allow Afghan soil to be used for attacks on other countries, but argued that “unfortunately, the Afghan soil was still being used against Pakistan.”

Pakistan claims its forces killed over 100 “Indian-backed terrorists” in major operations across Balochistan after deadly attacks that killed 33 people. Officials accused India and Afghanistan of backing the militants, but offered no evidence. Both countries have denied the allegations.

Pakistani security forces on Sunday (Feb 1) claimed they have killed more than 100 “Indian-backed terrorists” in sweeping counterterrorism operations across Balochistan. However, the nation did not share any proof to back the claim that the "terrorists" had Indian links. These counterterrorism operations come a day after a wave of deadly coordinated suicide and gun attacks left dozens of civilians and security personnel dead. Also read | Ex-UK envoy seen in compromising undies pic in Epstein files, quits Labour Party Major operations after deadly attacks As per reports, the raids began early Saturday (Jan 31) at multiple locations in the southwestern province of Balochistan, a day after coordinated suicide bombings and gun assaults killed 33 people, most of them civilians. According to provincial authorities, at least 18 civilians, including five women and three children, and 15 members of the security forces were killed during the violence over the past 40 hours. Also read | Over 200 killed as separatists, army clash in Pakistan’s Balochistan Fitna al-Hindustan Balochistan Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti, as cited by ABC News, told reporters in Quetta that Pakistani troops and police had killed 145 militants belonging to what the government calls “Fitna al-Hindustan”, a term it uses for the allegedly India-backed, banned Baloch Liberation Army (BLA). “The bodies of these 145 killed terrorists are in our custody, and some of them are Afghan nationals,” Bugti said, describing the toll as the highest in decades. He claimed the attackers had planned to take hostages and storm government offices in Quetta’s high-security zone, but were stopped before reaching the city centre. “We were aware of their plans, and our forces were prepared,” he said. Pakistan's unsubstantiated accusations against India and Afghanistan Bugti repeatedly accused India and Afghanistan of backing the assailants, alleging that senior BLA leaders were operating from Afghan territory. Both New Delhi and Kabul deny the claims. He said Afghanistan’s Taliban had pledged under the 2020 Doha agreement not to allow Afghan soil to be used for attacks on other countries, but argued that “unfortunately, the Afghan soil was still being used against Pakistan.”

Pakistan claims its forces killed over 100 “Indian-backed terrorists” in major operations across Balochistan after deadly attacks that killed 33 people. Officials accused India and Afghanistan of backing the militants, but offered no evidence. Both countries have denied the allegations.

Pakistan claims killed 145 ‘Fitna al-Hindustan’ terrorists, accuses India without offering proof

A newly released report by a Swiss defence think tank says that India’s Operation Sindoor in May 2025 fundamentally changed the air power balance in South Asia, ending with New Delhi securing effective control of the skies and forcing Pakistan to agree to a ceasefire within four days. The study, published by Switzerland’s Centre for Military History and Perspective Studies (CHPM) and written by military historian Adrien Fontanellaz, reconstructs in detail the 88-hour aerial confrontation between India and Pakistan from May 7 to May 10. It stands out as one of the most thorough independent examinations of the conflict to date.&nbsp;According to the report, India ultimately dismantled Pakistan’s air defence posture and strike capability, finishing the conflict on its own strategic terms. Operation Sindoor followed a deadly terror attack on civilians in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which Indian authorities attributed to Pakistan-based terrorist organisations. The report says that India’s political leadership authorised a response designed to be highly visible and forceful, accepting escalation risks to re-establish deterrence.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/uae-pulls-back-from-pakistan-airport-deal-here-s-what-reports-are-saying-1769422628809">UAE pulls back from Pakistan airport deal. Here's what reports are saying</a><h2>When did Operation Sindoor happen?</h2>In the early hours of May 7, the Indian Air Force conducted coordinated precision strikes against major terrorist hubs associated with Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba. Facilities in Bahawalpur and Muridke were hit using long-range weapons, with damage assessments confirming extensive destruction. The Swiss study notes that the scale, depth, and joint planning of these attacks exceeded any previous Indian response. Pakistan reacted, leading to one of the largest aerial confrontations in the region in recent decades. Dozens of aircraft from both sides were involved across multiple fronts. Leveraging Chinese-origin PL-15 missiles, airborne early warning platforms, and networked targeting, the Pakistan Air Force inflicted losses on Indian formations during the first night. This phase, the report says, gave Islamabad an early narrative advantage despite being tactically limited in scope.<h2>Where all did the Indian Air Force hit in Pakistan?</h2>Rather than defining the conflict, that initial exchange prompted a rapid shift in India’s approach. Over the next several days, the IAF executed a focused campaign to suppress and destroy Pakistan’s air defence systems. Using standoff munitions such as SCALP-EG and BrahMos, along with multi-axis strikes, Indian forces degraded radar coverage and surface-to-air missile sites. With Pakistan’s defensive network weakened, India escalated operations against key Pakistani air bases. Precision strikes targeted runways, logistics hubs, and support infrastructure, significantly curtailing the PAF’s ability to generate sorties. The Swiss analysts describe these attacks as unprecedented in both accuracy and persistence during an India–Pakistan crisis.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/uk-plans-british-fbi-to-fight-complex-crime-1769427371034/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/uk-plans-british-fbi-to-fight-complex-crime-1769427371034/embed</a>&nbsp;The report also highlights the effectiveness of India’s integrated air defence and command architecture. Systems such as the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCCS), linked with the Army’s Akashteer network and layered missile defences including Akash, Barak-8, and S-400, successfully neutralised Pakistani retaliatory attempts. By May 10, the study concludes, Pakistan’s ability to contest airspace had been decisively eroded. With air bases under continuous pressure and air defences compromised, Islamabad no longer had viable escalation options. India, having achieved functional air superiority, controlled the pace of operations, prompting Pakistan to seek a ceasefire.

India's air superiority during Operation Sindoor forced Pakistan for ceasefire: Swiss think tank

A newly released report by a Swiss defence think tank says that India’s Operation Sindoor in May 2025 fundamentally changed the air power balance in South Asia, ending with New Delhi securing effective control of the skies and forcing Pakistan to agree to a ceasefire within four days. The study, published by Switzerland’s Centre for Military History and Perspective Studies (CHPM) and written by military historian Adrien Fontanellaz, reconstructs in detail the 88-hour aerial confrontation between India and Pakistan from May 7 to May 10. It stands out as one of the most thorough independent examinations of the conflict to date. According to the report, India ultimately dismantled Pakistan’s air defence posture and strike capability, finishing the conflict on its own strategic terms. Operation Sindoor followed a deadly terror attack on civilians in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which Indian authorities attributed to Pakistan-based terrorist organisations. The report says that India’s political leadership authorised a response designed to be highly visible and forceful, accepting escalation risks to re-establish deterrence. Also Read: UAE pulls back from Pakistan airport deal. Here's what reports are saying When did Operation Sindoor happen? In the early hours of May 7, the Indian Air Force conducted coordinated precision strikes against major terrorist hubs associated with Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba. Facilities in Bahawalpur and Muridke were hit using long-range weapons, with damage assessments confirming extensive destruction. The Swiss study notes that the scale, depth, and joint planning of these attacks exceeded any previous Indian response. Pakistan reacted, leading to one of the largest aerial confrontations in the region in recent decades. Dozens of aircraft from both sides were involved across multiple fronts. Leveraging Chinese-origin PL-15 missiles, airborne early warning platforms, and networked targeting, the Pakistan Air Force inflicted losses on Indian formations during the first night. This phase, the report says, gave Islamabad an early narrative advantage despite being tactically limited in scope. Where all did the Indian Air Force hit in Pakistan? Rather than defining the conflict, that initial exchange prompted a rapid shift in India’s approach. Over the next several days, the IAF executed a focused campaign to suppress and destroy Pakistan’s air defence systems. Using standoff munitions such as SCALP-EG and BrahMos, along with multi-axis strikes, Indian forces degraded radar coverage and surface-to-air missile sites. With Pakistan’s defensive network weakened, India escalated operations against key Pakistani air bases. Precision strikes targeted runways, logistics hubs, and support infrastructure, significantly curtailing the PAF’s ability to generate sorties. The Swiss analysts describe these attacks as unprecedented in both accuracy and persistence during an India–Pakistan crisis. https://www.wionews.com/videos/uk-plans-british-fbi-to-fight-complex-crime-1769427371034/embed The report also highlights the effectiveness of India’s integrated air defence and command architecture. Systems such as the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCCS), linked with the Army’s Akashteer network and layered missile defences including Akash, Barak-8, and S-400, successfully neutralised Pakistani retaliatory attempts. By May 10, the study concludes, Pakistan’s ability to contest airspace had been decisively eroded. With air bases under continuous pressure and air defences compromised, Islamabad no longer had viable escalation options. India, having achieved functional air superiority, controlled the pace of operations, prompting Pakistan to seek a ceasefire.

Swiss think tank report finds India achieved air superiority during Operation Sindoor, degrading Pakistan’s air defences and forcing a ceasefire after four days

Nikkhil Advani’s latest web series, Freedom At Midnight Season 2, which was released last week, is a must-watch for the times we live in. In an era of war, where bigotry has become an intrinsic part of everyday life, the series urges us to look back in order to understand what truly holds a diverse country like India together.Without sermonising or softening the truth, it highlights the social fabric on which India was founded—one woven with ideals of peace, harmony, and secularism.&nbsp;The show, based on Larry Collins and Dominique Lapierre's expansive novel by the same name, talks of the incidents and decisions that paved the way for India’s independence and the formation of Pakistan. Brilliantly adapted by writer Abhinandan Gupta, the show beautifully highlights the pain and the anguish of not just the people but also our leaders during the partition of India- a decision which was taken by a handful of men but defined the future of millions of people.<h2>Humanising our leaders</h2>&nbsp;Partition has been a subject of interest for many writers and filmmakers over the years. It has been 78 years since India got its freedom, but Partition remains one of the most harrowing incidents in history- scars of that moment have left deep wounds on families for generations.&nbsp;Season 2 begins with Mountbatten ordering Sir Radcliffe to do the needful and draw the lines that would divide the Hindu and Muslim populations into two countries. While Mountbatten seemed nonchalant, it is Sir Radcliffe who seemed reluctant (or so says the show). How to divide people who have lived together in harmony for generations? How to remove people from their origin? A task that seemed monumental and heavy on Radcliffe’s shoulders despite years of experience.&nbsp;While the first season concentrated on the incidents and moments that led to the Independence, season two shows Independent India grappling with a multitude of problems. The partition that has torn apart the country, the accession of princely states into the newly formed union, and the Hindu-Muslim riots that ravaged the streets of Calcutta and Lahore. It is a time when both India and Pakistan are taking the first steps as independent nations. While there are celebrations on the streets, the series shows the leaders in anguish- especially Nehru- conscious of how they have had to lose out on a huge chunk of the population and land to satisfy Jinnah’s wishes and carve out Pakistan.&nbsp;Jinnah, for obvious reasons, is shown as this mad egotistical man, who was adamant to have a Muslim state- the writers also add a human side to the maglanomaniac. A poignant scene shows Jinnah looking lonely at his home in India, one last time as he leaves for Pakistan. No words are spoken, but actor Arif Zakaria, who plays Jinnah in the show, emotes through sheer expressions, delivering how even the toughest of men had a softer side- especially when it came to one’s home and motherland.<h2>Freedom, but at what cost?</h2>&nbsp;Freedom at Midnight, in fact, has some of the most poignant moments, which constantly make you realise that the decision of Partition was not an easy one- and one that never let the leaders rest easy. As Nehru (Sidhant Gupta) delivers the historic ‘At The Stroke of Midnight’ speech at the parliament, celebrations erupt across the nation. Men and women take to the streets to celebrate, and Gandhi(Chirag Vohra) is shown lying in an empty room, facing the wall, unwilling to celebrate the moment that would define Indian history and a moment that he had yearned and strived for decades. The beauty lies in the detailed screenplay, which shows Gandhi tearing up at the stroke of midnight as India makes its tryst with destiny. The emotions are perhaps due to a sense of failure, for he is conscious of how the much yearned-for independence has come at a cost.&nbsp;<h2>The problematic neighbour</h2>&nbsp;Freedom at Midnight was released a month after the country was treated to a blitzkrieg called Dhurandhar. Most of us have watched Aditya Dhar’s detailed, somewhat gory and very long spy thriller. Dhar’s film and Advani’s series both show the complexities that come with having Pakistan as a neighbour. But the treatment is starkly different. Dhar’s film pumps the adrenaline, making you feel aggressively angry towards the neighbour. Freedom of Midnight instead makes you question the divisive politics that the leaders sought in order to get freedom in the first place. A moment in the series has Nehru and Jinnah standing in their respective homes, perhaps reflecting on what has led to the decision of partition, while Gandhi’s voice looms over in the background, foretelling how a decision of a handful of men will cost the future of billions in both countries. The poignant moment makes you think hard. Was the two-nation theory really worth it? For over seven decades, the two countries have been warring, and there have been more losses than gains for both countries. Back then, people lost their homes, their childhood, and their wealth due to partition; now, people lose their lives and homes due to war and cross-border terrorism.&nbsp;&nbsp;It's a choice that one must make- which costs us more, to live peacefully or constantly wanting to be at war.&nbsp;Before anyone jumps in to question whether the show is pro-Pakistan, it must be reiterated that the show is actually pro-peace, pro-secularism, where a PM Nehru is shown constantly pushing for the secular fabric of the newly formed democratic country. Sure, it shies away from naming Nathuram Godse as Gandhi’s murderer instead resorting to a show figure, and instead concentrates on a certain Pahwa- a man anguished at Gandhi’s empathy towards the Muslim brothers in post- partition India, but the show constantly reiterates how the leaders could never fully be free from the burden that Partition bore. It came with a cost, and as Gandhi points out, its impact continues to dominate the politics of the subcontinent, decades later.&nbsp;Freedom at Midnight, Season 1 and 2, are streaming on Sony Liv.

Nikkhil Advani's latest series Freedom at Midnight is a timely reminder of what our country India has always been known for. The series goes back in time to narrate the darkest petriod of Indian history- the partition- and the consequences it bore. 

Nikkhil Advani’s latest web series, Freedom At Midnight Season 2, which was released last week, is a must-watch for the times we live in. In an era of war, where bigotry has become an intrinsic part of everyday life, the series urges us to look back in order to understand what truly holds a diverse country like India together. Without sermonising or softening the truth, it highlights the social fabric on which India was founded—one woven with ideals of peace, harmony, and secularism. The show, based on Larry Collins and Dominique Lapierre's expansive novel by the same name, talks of the incidents and decisions that paved the way for India’s independence and the formation of Pakistan. Brilliantly adapted by writer Abhinandan Gupta, the show beautifully highlights the pain and the anguish of not just the people but also our leaders during the partition of India- a decision which was taken by a handful of men but defined the future of millions of people. Humanising our leaders Partition has been a subject of interest for many writers and filmmakers over the years. It has been 78 years since India got its freedom, but Partition remains one of the most harrowing incidents in history- scars of that moment have left deep wounds on families for generations. Season 2 begins with Mountbatten ordering Sir Radcliffe to do the needful and draw the lines that would divide the Hindu and Muslim populations into two countries. While Mountbatten seemed nonchalant, it is Sir Radcliffe who seemed reluctant (or so says the show). How to divide people who have lived together in harmony for generations? How to remove people from their origin? A task that seemed monumental and heavy on Radcliffe’s shoulders despite years of experience. While the first season concentrated on the incidents and moments that led to the Independence, season two shows Independent India grappling with a multitude of problems. The partition that has torn apart the country, the accession of princely states into the newly formed union, and the Hindu-Muslim riots that ravaged the streets of Calcutta and Lahore. It is a time when both India and Pakistan are taking the first steps as independent nations. While there are celebrations on the streets, the series shows the leaders in anguish- especially Nehru- conscious of how they have had to lose out on a huge chunk of the population and land to satisfy Jinnah’s wishes and carve out Pakistan. Jinnah, for obvious reasons, is shown as this mad egotistical man, who was adamant to have a Muslim state- the writers also add a human side to the maglanomaniac. A poignant scene shows Jinnah looking lonely at his home in India, one last time as he leaves for Pakistan. No words are spoken, but actor Arif Zakaria, who plays Jinnah in the show, emotes through sheer expressions, delivering how even the toughest of men had a softer side- especially when it came to one’s home and motherland. Freedom, but at what cost? Freedom at Midnight, in fact, has some of the most poignant moments, which constantly make you realise that the decision of Partition was not an easy one- and one that never let the leaders rest easy. As Nehru (Sidhant Gupta) delivers the historic ‘At The Stroke of Midnight’ speech at the parliament, celebrations erupt across the nation. Men and women take to the streets to celebrate, and Gandhi(Chirag Vohra) is shown lying in an empty room, facing the wall, unwilling to celebrate the moment that would define Indian history and a moment that he had yearned and strived for decades. The beauty lies in the detailed screenplay, which shows Gandhi tearing up at the stroke of midnight as India makes its tryst with destiny. The emotions are perhaps due to a sense of failure, for he is conscious of how the much yearned-for independence has come at a cost. The problematic neighbour Freedom at Midnight was released a month after the country was treated to a blitzkrieg called Dhurandhar. Most of us have watched Aditya Dhar’s detailed, somewhat gory and very long spy thriller. Dhar’s film and Advani’s series both show the complexities that come with having Pakistan as a neighbour. But the treatment is starkly different. Dhar’s film pumps the adrenaline, making you feel aggressively angry towards the neighbour. Freedom of Midnight instead makes you question the divisive politics that the leaders sought in order to get freedom in the first place. A moment in the series has Nehru and Jinnah standing in their respective homes, perhaps reflecting on what has led to the decision of partition, while Gandhi’s voice looms over in the background, foretelling how a decision of a handful of men will cost the future of billions in both countries. The poignant moment makes you think hard. Was the two-nation theory really worth it? For over seven decades, the two countries have been warring, and there have been more losses than gains for both countries. Back then, people lost their homes, their childhood, and their wealth due to partition; now, people lose their lives and homes due to war and cross-border terrorism. It's a choice that one must make- which costs us more, to live peacefully or constantly wanting to be at war. Before anyone jumps in to question whether the show is pro-Pakistan, it must be reiterated that the show is actually pro-peace, pro-secularism, where a PM Nehru is shown constantly pushing for the secular fabric of the newly formed democratic country. Sure, it shies away from naming Nathuram Godse as Gandhi’s murderer instead resorting to a show figure, and instead concentrates on a certain Pahwa- a man anguished at Gandhi’s empathy towards the Muslim brothers in post- partition India, but the show constantly reiterates how the leaders could never fully be free from the burden that Partition bore. It came with a cost, and as Gandhi points out, its impact continues to dominate the politics of the subcontinent, decades later. Freedom at Midnight, Season 1 and 2, are streaming on Sony Liv.

Nikkhil Advani's latest series Freedom at Midnight is a timely reminder of what our country India has always been known for. The series goes back in time to narrate the darkest petriod of Indian history- the partition- and the consequences it bore.&nbsp;

Freedom At Midnight Season 2 arrives when India needs its secular memory the most

India firmly countered Pakistan at the United Nations after Islamabad once again raised the issue of Jammu and Kashmir during a General Assembly session, accusing Pakistan of exploiting UN forums to promote what New Delhi termed a 'divisive narrative'. The rebuttal followed remarks by Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, who referenced Jammu and Kashmir in his address. India dismissed the comments as inappropriate and disconnected from the realities on the ground.&nbsp;Presenting India’s national statement during the UN General Assembly plenary discussion on the Secretary-General’s annual report, Eldos Mathew Punnoose, Counsellor at India’s Permanent Mission to the UN, said Pakistan has made a habit of politicising multilateral platforms, according to news agency PTI. Punnoose remarked that while the international community is expected to rise above narrow national interests, Pakistan continues to misuse UN mechanisms to advance its agenda. He stressed that Pakistan’s reference to Jammu and Kashmir was unjustified, reiterating that the Union Territory is an inseparable part of India.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/bjp-takes-all-in-maharashtra-local-body-polls-mahayuti-alliance-dethrones-thackeray-from-bmc-devendra-fadanvis-1768561208172">BJP takes all in Maharashtra local body polls; Mahayuti alliance dethrones Thackeray family from BMC</a>&nbsp;India’s response came amid Pakistan’s repeated efforts to internationalise the Kashmir issue at various UN bodies, attempts that New Delhi maintains have consistently failed to attract broader global backing. Addressing the principle of self-determination, Punnoose warned against its distortion to legitimise separatist claims. While acknowledging self-determination as a core UN principle, he emphasised that it should not be weaponised to encourage fragmentation in democratic and pluralistic societies. He added that Pakistan should refrain from making unfounded allegations that misrepresent reality.&nbsp;Beyond bilateral issues, India also drew attention to challenges faced by the Global South. Punnoose said India has actively worked to amplify these concerns across UN platforms and called for concrete follow-up actions to translate collective sentiment into measurable outcomes. He further noted that the United Nations is navigating a pivotal moment, facing mounting expectations across its mandates of peace and security, development, and human rights.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-tests-quantum-cyber-tools-in-frontline-ops-1768558859021/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-tests-quantum-cyber-tools-in-frontline-ops-1768558859021/embed</a>&nbsp;India also expressed concern over the UN’s limited effectiveness in addressing ongoing global conflicts, warning that inaction undermines the organisation’s credibility. With conflicts escalating worldwide, Punnoose said the international community looks to the UN to alleviate human suffering and restore peace.

India slams Pakistan for raising Kashmir issue at United Nations General Assembly, accuses Islamabad of exploiting UN bodies

India firmly countered Pakistan at the United Nations after Islamabad once again raised the issue of Jammu and Kashmir during a General Assembly session, accusing Pakistan of exploiting UN forums to promote what New Delhi termed a 'divisive narrative'. The rebuttal followed remarks by Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, who referenced Jammu and Kashmir in his address. India dismissed the comments as inappropriate and disconnected from the realities on the ground. Presenting India’s national statement during the UN General Assembly plenary discussion on the Secretary-General’s annual report, Eldos Mathew Punnoose, Counsellor at India’s Permanent Mission to the UN, said Pakistan has made a habit of politicising multilateral platforms, according to news agency PTI. Punnoose remarked that while the international community is expected to rise above narrow national interests, Pakistan continues to misuse UN mechanisms to advance its agenda. He stressed that Pakistan’s reference to Jammu and Kashmir was unjustified, reiterating that the Union Territory is an inseparable part of India. Also Read: BJP takes all in Maharashtra local body polls; Mahayuti alliance dethrones Thackeray family from BMC India’s response came amid Pakistan’s repeated efforts to internationalise the Kashmir issue at various UN bodies, attempts that New Delhi maintains have consistently failed to attract broader global backing. Addressing the principle of self-determination, Punnoose warned against its distortion to legitimise separatist claims. While acknowledging self-determination as a core UN principle, he emphasised that it should not be weaponised to encourage fragmentation in democratic and pluralistic societies. He added that Pakistan should refrain from making unfounded allegations that misrepresent reality. Beyond bilateral issues, India also drew attention to challenges faced by the Global South. Punnoose said India has actively worked to amplify these concerns across UN platforms and called for concrete follow-up actions to translate collective sentiment into measurable outcomes. He further noted that the United Nations is navigating a pivotal moment, facing mounting expectations across its mandates of peace and security, development, and human rights. https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-tests-quantum-cyber-tools-in-frontline-ops-1768558859021/embed India also expressed concern over the UN’s limited effectiveness in addressing ongoing global conflicts, warning that inaction undermines the organisation’s credibility. With conflicts escalating worldwide, Punnoose said the international community looks to the UN to alleviate human suffering and restore peace.

India strongly countered Pakistan at the United Nations after Kashmir was raised again, accusing Islamabad of misusing global platforms and reiterating its sovereignty claim

In a stunning public admission that cuts through years of denials and diplomatic doublespeak, the commander of Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Hafiz Abdul Rauf, has acknowledged that India's Operation Sindoor delivered a devastating blow to the terror group's nerve centre in Muridke. 

Op Sindoor: LeT Commander Accepts Damage to Mudrike Hideout 

India has blocked the social media handles of Pakistan's state-backed "Asia One" news outlet, which has been spreading anti-India propaganda. Asia One, launched after the India-Pakistan conflict of May 2025, after the Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistan-trained terrorists, was seen as part of Pakistan's information warfare and was used to spread misinformation. Many of its correspondents have been regularly churning out anti-India misinformation. A recent report by the channel was fact-checked by India's Foreign Ministry.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark" data-dnt="true" align="center">Fake News Alert! Be vigilant against fake news on Social Media! <a href="https://t.co/xMLgz1BovL">pic.twitter.com/xMLgz1BovL</a>&mdash; MEA FactCheck (@MEAFactCheck) <a href="https://twitter.com/MEAFactCheck/status/2008555560648802372?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The channel positions itself as Pakistan's first satellite-based "global" English news network, employing foreign anchors and adopting a polished production style reminiscent of Qatar's Al Jazeera and Turkey's TRT World. Indian security experts and media reports have described the channel as a sophisticated propaganda attempt aligned with Pakistan's military establishment, including the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and its media wing, the ISPR.Since its launch, Asia One has faced accusations in India of distorting coverage of Operation Sindoor, Jammu and Kashmir, cross-border terrorism, and bilateral relations, often amplifying perspectives of the Pakistani military. The Indian block follows earlier measures: in the immediate aftermath of the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, India banned over a dozen major Pakistani YouTube channels and many Pakistani reporters for spreading misinformation. They remained blocked.Asia One channel rarely covered anti-military news, including attacks on minorities in the country, human rights violations in Balochistan, KPK.<h2>Shrinking space for media in Pakistan</h2>Earlier this month, a Pakistani anti-terrorism court in Islamabad sentenced seven individuals, including several well-known journalists and commentators, to double life imprisonment in absentia. The convictions relate to charges of "digital terrorism", inciting violence, and waging war against the state, linked to online activity around the May 2023 riots following the arrest of former Prime Minister Imran Khan.Those sentenced include journalists Sabir Shakir, Shaheen Sehbai, Moeed Pirzada, and Wajahat Saeed Khan, along with YouTuber Adil Raja, commentator Haider Raza Mehdi, and retired army officer Akbar Hussain, all believed to be living abroad. The accused were also fined and face additional prison terms if fines remain unpaid.Rights groups have criticised the ruling as a serious blow to press freedom, amid ongoing concerns over the use of anti-terror laws against dissent in Pakistan. &nbsp;

Indian security experts and media reports have described the channel as a sophisticated propaganda attempt aligned with Pakistan's military establishment, including the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and its media wing, the ISPR.

India has blocked the social media handles of Pakistan's state-backed "Asia One" news outlet, which has been spreading anti-India propaganda. Asia One, launched after the India-Pakistan conflict of May 2025, after the Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistan-trained terrorists, was seen as part of Pakistan's information warfare and was used to spread misinformation. Many of its correspondents have been regularly churning out anti-India misinformation. A recent report by the channel was fact-checked by India's Foreign Ministry.

Indian security experts and media reports have described the channel as a sophisticated propaganda attempt aligned with Pakistan's military establishment, including the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and its media wing, the ISPR.

India blocks Pakistani outlet Asia One channel, known for spreading propaganda

During a White House meeting with US oil industry leaders on Saturday, President Donald Trump reiterated sweeping assertions about his foreign policy record, including his long-repeated claim that he single-handedly prevented a major war between India and Pakistan.


Donald Trump: I Settled India-Pakistan War Without Nuclear Weapons

Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch, in a letter to India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, has warned that China could deploy its military forces in Pakistan's Balochistan region within the next few months. He warned that the move would mark a dangerous escalation of the deepening China-Pakistan alliance.<h2>Baloch leader writes to Jaishankar</h2>In an open letter addressed to Jaishankar and posted on X on New Year's Day, Mir Yar Baloch said Baloch representatives view the deepening China-Pakistan alliance as a direct threat to the region and its people.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-proposes-stricter-drugs-rules-to-restrict-over-the-counter-sale-of-cough-syrups-1767259581543">India proposes Drugs Rules to restrict over the counter sale of cough syrups</a>He argued that Balochistan has endured decades of repression under Pakistani control, accusing the state of systematic violence and widespread human rights abuses. "The people of Balochistan have endured Pakistan's state occupation, state-sponsored terrorism, and egregious human rights atrocities for the past seventy-nine years," he wrote, adding that the moment had come to confront what he described as a long festering crisis. "The time has now arrived to eradicate this festering affliction at its roots, ensuring lasting peace and sovereignty for our nation".<h2>CPEC, Balochistan, and Bharat</h2>A central concern, Mir Yar Baloch raised in the letter, was the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, or CPEC, a flagship project under Chinese President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative that passes through Balochistan. Mir Yar Baloch claimed the project was moving rapidly towards its final stages and warned that it could soon bring Chinese troops onto Baloch soil."Should the capabilities of Balochistan's defense and freedom forces not be further bolstered, and if they continue to be overlooked as per longstanding patterns, it is conceivable that China could deploy its military forces in Balochistan within a few months," the letter stated. Any such move without the consent of the local population, Baloch warned, would have serious consequences not just for Balochistan but also for India, which he referred to as Bharat.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/donald-trump-ends-2025-with-hateful-late-night-truth-social-tirade-tells-rivals-to-rot-in-hell-in-ny26-1767235319298">Trump ends 2025 with hateful Truth Social tirade, tells rivals to 'rot in hell'</a>"The presence of Chinese boots on Balochistani soil without the will of the 60 million Baloch people would pose an unimaginable threat and challenge to the futures of both Bharat and Balochistan."China and Pakistan have consistently rejected claims that CPEC has any military dimension, maintaining that it is purely an economic project. India, however, has opposed CPEC from the start, arguing that it violates its sovereignty because it runs through Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir.In his letter, Mir Yar Baloch also praised India’s Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir following the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people. He described the strikes as a show of "exemplary courage and a steadfast commitment to regional security and justice".

Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has warned India that China could deploy troops in Pakistan’s Balochistan within months, citing CPEC’s final stages. In a letter to S Jaishankar, he called it a grave threat to Baloch people, and Bharat.

Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch, in a letter to India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, has warned that China could deploy its military forces in Pakistan's Balochistan region within the next few months. He warned that the move would mark a dangerous escalation of the deepening China-Pakistan alliance. Baloch leader writes to Jaishankar In an open letter addressed to Jaishankar and posted on X on New Year's Day, Mir Yar Baloch said Baloch representatives view the deepening China-Pakistan alliance as a direct threat to the region and its people. Also read | India proposes Drugs Rules to restrict over the counter sale of cough syrups He argued that Balochistan has endured decades of repression under Pakistani control, accusing the state of systematic violence and widespread human rights abuses. "The people of Balochistan have endured Pakistan's state occupation, state-sponsored terrorism, and egregious human rights atrocities for the past seventy-nine years," he wrote, adding that the moment had come to confront what he described as a long festering crisis. "The time has now arrived to eradicate this festering affliction at its roots, ensuring lasting peace and sovereignty for our nation". CPEC, Balochistan, and Bharat A central concern, Mir Yar Baloch raised in the letter, was the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, or CPEC, a flagship project under Chinese President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative that passes through Balochistan. Mir Yar Baloch claimed the project was moving rapidly towards its final stages and warned that it could soon bring Chinese troops onto Baloch soil. "Should the capabilities of Balochistan's defense and freedom forces not be further bolstered, and if they continue to be overlooked as per longstanding patterns, it is conceivable that China could deploy its military forces in Balochistan within a few months," the letter stated. Any such move without the consent of the local population, Baloch warned, would have serious consequences not just for Balochistan but also for India, which he referred to as Bharat. Also read | Trump ends 2025 with hateful Truth Social tirade, tells rivals to 'rot in hell' "The presence of Chinese boots on Balochistani soil without the will of the 60 million Baloch people would pose an unimaginable threat and challenge to the futures of both Bharat and Balochistan." China and Pakistan have consistently rejected claims that CPEC has any military dimension, maintaining that it is purely an economic project. India, however, has opposed CPEC from the start, arguing that it violates its sovereignty because it runs through Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. In his letter, Mir Yar Baloch also praised India’s Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir following the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people. He described the strikes as a show of "exemplary courage and a steadfast commitment to regional security and justice".

Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has warned India that China could deploy troops in Pakistan’s Balochistan within months, citing CPEC’s final stages. In a letter to S Jaishankar, he called it a grave threat to Baloch people, and Bharat.

'Bharat's future': Baloch leader warns India about 'unimaginable' Pakistan threat flags, China troops in Balochistan

India’s Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal triggered a sharp reaction on Monday (December 8) with a pointed remark about Pakistan’s internal political situation, suggesting that “democracy and Pakistan don’t go together.” His comment came during the ministry’s weekly briefing, when he was asked about the deteriorating democratic climate in Pakistan, particularly regarding former prime minister Imran Khan and the ongoing unrest. Jaiswal said India is closely monitoring developments across the border but chose not to elaborate. “We monitor everything happening in Pakistan. As for democracy, you said it is weakening there. Democracy and Pakistan don't go together, so it’s best not to say more,” he remarked.<h2>On Pakistan–Afghanistan border tensions</h2>Addressing a separate question about recent clashes along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, Jaiswal expressed India’s concern over reports of Afghan civilian deaths. “We have seen reports of border clashes in which several Afghan civilians have been killed. We condemn such attacks on innocent Afghan people. India strongly supports the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence of Afghanistan,” he added. At least five people were killed after heavy gunfire was exchanged between Pakistani and Afghan forces on Friday, news agency Reuters reported, worsening relations following the collapse of peace talks the previous weekend.<h2>Watch the video here</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Delhi: MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal says, &quot;We keep a close eye on every development in Pakistan. But regarding democracy, you&#39;re saying that democracy in Pakistan is becoming weak and its strengths are being weakened. Democracy and Pakistan don&#39;t go together.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/SxTAOHt8qp">pic.twitter.com/SxTAOHt8qp</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1998005140255826149?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Escalating political turmoil in Pakistan</h2>Jaiswal’s comments coincided with escalating political tensions in Pakistan. Earlier in the week, Pakistan’s military issued an unusually blunt criticism of Imran Khan. Military spokesperson Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, without naming him directly, described the imprisoned ex-prime minister as a “mentally ill” narcissist, according to the news agency Associated Press. The military’s statement came a day after Khan posted on X, calling Army Chief Gen. Asim Munir a “mentally unstable individual” whom he blamed for the breakdown of Pakistan’s constitutional order.&nbsp;Khan, 73, has been incarcerated since 2023 following a corruption conviction and continues to face several legal challenges. His party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), has repeatedly demanded consistent access for his family and supporters amid persistent speculation over his health and circulating false rumours of his death. Last week, authorities at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi allowed Khan’s sister, Uzma Khanum, to meet him, according to Dawn. Meanwhile, PTI activists staged protests outside the Islamabad High Court and the jail, decrying restrictions on visitation and demanding greater transparency regarding Khan’s condition.

'Democracy and Pakistan don't go together': India reacts sharply to Pakistan’s deepening political crisis

India’s Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal triggered a sharp reaction on Monday (December 8) with a pointed remark about Pakistan’s internal political situation, suggesting that “democracy and Pakistan don’t go together.” His comment came during the ministry’s weekly briefing, when he was asked about the deteriorating democratic climate in Pakistan, particularly regarding former prime minister Imran Khan and the ongoing unrest. Jaiswal said India is closely monitoring developments across the border but chose not to elaborate. “We monitor everything happening in Pakistan. As for democracy, you said it is weakening there. Democracy and Pakistan don't go together, so it’s best not to say more,” he remarked. On Pakistan–Afghanistan border tensions Addressing a separate question about recent clashes along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, Jaiswal expressed India’s concern over reports of Afghan civilian deaths. “We have seen reports of border clashes in which several Afghan civilians have been killed. We condemn such attacks on innocent Afghan people. India strongly supports the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence of Afghanistan,” he added. At least five people were killed after heavy gunfire was exchanged between Pakistani and Afghan forces on Friday, news agency Reuters reported, worsening relations following the collapse of peace talks the previous weekend. Watch the video here

India’s MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, during a briefing said that democracy and Pakistan “don’t go together” as tensions rise over Imran Khan’s detention and border clashes with Afghanistan

John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer and whistleblower, recently shared an extraordinary story of how he received threats from Pakistan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, following comments he made about the India-Pakistan conflict. In a candid interview on the Julian Dorey Podcast, Kiriakou described how he was sent a threatening letter from PTI officials after he said that Pakistan would lose a conventional war to India. His controversial remark drew sharp criticism and online attacks from Pakistanis, but what struck him most was the formal letter he received from the party.&nbsp;Kiriakou's statement had been made during an October interview with news agency ANI, where he argued that "nothing good will come from a war between India and Pakistan, because Pakistanis will lose." He clarified that his words were focused on conventional warfare, not nuclear conflict. The PTI, under the leadership of Chaudhry Parvez Elahi, quickly reacted, sending Kiriakou a letter that demanded an apology. The letter, written in strong language, called for Kiriakou to apologise to former Prime Minister Imran Khan, PTI members, and the people of Pakistan.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/no-formal-us-peace-offer-received-as-kyiv-reacts-carefully-says-moscow-1763736221658">No formal US peace offer received as Kyiv reacts carefully, says Moscow</a>&nbsp;Despite advice from his lawyer to discard the letter, Kiriakou refused to back down. In a bold move, he sent a response saying, "In regards to your demand for an apology, I wipe my a** with your demands for an apology." Kiriakou’s unapologetic and defiant reply ended the exchange, and he has yet to hear back from PTI officials. Kiriakou, who worked for the CIA for more than 15 years, played a key role in the agency’s anti-terror operations after 9/11 attack. He was also part of the team that captured Abu Zubaydah, a senior member of al-Qaeda, during a high-profile raid &nbsp;back in 2002.

'I wipe my a** with your apology demands': CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou reveals reply to threats from Imran Khan's party

John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer and whistleblower, recently shared an extraordinary story of how he received threats from Pakistan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, following comments he made about the India-Pakistan conflict. In a candid interview on the Julian Dorey Podcast, Kiriakou described how he was sent a threatening letter from PTI officials after he said that Pakistan would lose a conventional war to India. His controversial remark drew sharp criticism and online attacks from Pakistanis, but what struck him most was the formal letter he received from the party. Kiriakou's statement had been made during an October interview with news agency ANI, where he argued that "nothing good will come from a war between India and Pakistan, because Pakistanis will lose." He clarified that his words were focused on conventional warfare, not nuclear conflict. The PTI, under the leadership of Chaudhry Parvez Elahi, quickly reacted, sending Kiriakou a letter that demanded an apology. The letter, written in strong language, called for Kiriakou to apologise to former Prime Minister Imran Khan, PTI members, and the people of Pakistan. Also Read: No formal US peace offer received as Kyiv reacts carefully, says Moscow Despite advice from his lawyer to discard the letter, Kiriakou refused to back down. In a bold move, he sent a response saying, "In regards to your demand for an apology, I wipe my a** with your demands for an apology." Kiriakou’s unapologetic and defiant reply ended the exchange, and he has yet to hear back from PTI officials. Kiriakou, who worked for the CIA for more than 15 years, played a key role in the agency’s anti-terror operations after 9/11 attack. He was also part of the team that captured Abu Zubaydah, a senior member of al-Qaeda, during a high-profile raid back in 2002.

CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou reveals in a podcast how he responded to Imran Khan's party's threat over his remarks on Pakistan losing to India

Pakistan fast bowler Haris Rauf has been suspended for two matches after accumulating four demerit points in the Asia Cup 2025, following multiple breaches of the ICC Code of Conduct.
Rauf’s controversial gestures during India-Pakistan clashes on September 14 and 28 were deemed “conduct that brings the game into disrepute” under Article 2.21.
India captain Suryakumar Yadav was also fined 30 percent of his match fee and given two demerit points for a breach during the tournament.

Pakistan Fast Bowler Haris Rauf Suspended After Asia Cup Code Breaches

Good news for the Indian Air Force, in a major defence boost, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has announced its intention to extend the range of its Astra Mark 2 air-to-air missile to more than 200 kilometres. The move, as per reports, is aimed at strengthening India’s indigenous capabilities in beyond visual range (BVR) air combat and enhancing the striking power of its fighter jets in the aftermath of the recent India-Pakistan war.<h2>India to acquire 700 Mark 2 missiles</h2>Citing defence sources, ANI reports that the Defence Ministry is expected to soon discuss a proposal for the acquisition of around 700 Astra Mark 2 missiles. These will be integrated into the Sukhoi and Light Combat Aircraft fleets, giving Indian pilots the ability to engage adversaries from much longer distances than before.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kerala-s-brain-eating-amoeba-scare-deepens-3-year-old-latest-to-be-infected-death-toll-rises-to-23-1760341544268">Kerala’s ‘brain-eating amoeba’ scare deepens: 3-year-old latest to be infected, death toll rises to 23</a>Earlier plans had targeted a maximum range of roughly 160 kilometres, but the new development pushes that envelope significantly, making India one of the few countries in the region with such extended BVR capabilities.<h2>Astra Mark 2</h2>The Astra Mark 2 builds on the success of its predecessor, the Astra Mark 1, which already boasts a range exceeding 100 kilometres and features an advanced guidance and navigation system. The DRDO has collaborated with over 50 public and private organisations, including Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, to bring the missile from concept to deployment.Developing indigenous long-range air-to-air missiles has become a key priority for India, particularly as regional aerial threats evolve. During Operation Sindoor, for example, India demonstrated its ability to strike Pakistani airbases and terror camps from stand-off ranges, limiting the risk to its own pilots. Pakistani aircraft, including F-16s and Chinese-made fighters, were reportedly destroyed both in the air and on the ground, along with several unmanned aerial vehicles and reconnaissance planes.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/sam-altman-okays-ai-porn-on-chatgpt-says-current-version-less-enjoyable-to-users-with-no-mental-health-problems-1760493777871">Sam Altman okays AI porn on ChatGPT, says OpenAI chatbot's current version 'less enjoyable'</a>The Pakistan Air Force attempted counterattacks using PL-15 missiles, but they failed to impact Indian forces significantly. The experience highlighted the importance of long-range indigenous missile capabilities to ensure air superiority in the region.With the Astra Mark 2’s upgraded range, India aims to maintain a strategic edge in future aerial engagements, allowing pilots to engage threats beyond visual range while keeping Indian fighter jets safely out of reach.&nbsp;

India’s DRDO is set to extend the range of its Astra Mark 2 air-to-air missile to over 200 km, a major boost for the Indian Air Force. Here's all you need to know.

Good news for the Indian Air Force, in a major defence boost, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has announced its intention to extend the range of its Astra Mark 2 air-to-air missile to more than 200 kilometres. The move, as per reports, is aimed at strengthening India’s indigenous capabilities in beyond visual range (BVR) air combat and enhancing the striking power of its fighter jets in the aftermath of the recent India-Pakistan war. India to acquire 700 Mark 2 missiles Citing defence sources, ANI reports that the Defence Ministry is expected to soon discuss a proposal for the acquisition of around 700 Astra Mark 2 missiles. These will be integrated into the Sukhoi and Light Combat Aircraft fleets, giving Indian pilots the ability to engage adversaries from much longer distances than before. Also read | Kerala’s ‘brain-eating amoeba’ scare deepens: 3-year-old latest to be infected, death toll rises to 23 Earlier plans had targeted a maximum range of roughly 160 kilometres, but the new development pushes that envelope significantly, making India one of the few countries in the region with such extended BVR capabilities. Astra Mark 2 The Astra Mark 2 builds on the success of its predecessor, the Astra Mark 1, which already boasts a range exceeding 100 kilometres and features an advanced guidance and navigation system. The DRDO has collaborated with over 50 public and private organisations, including Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, to bring the missile from concept to deployment. Developing indigenous long-range air-to-air missiles has become a key priority for India, particularly as regional aerial threats evolve. During Operation Sindoor, for example, India demonstrated its ability to strike Pakistani airbases and terror camps from stand-off ranges, limiting the risk to its own pilots. Pakistani aircraft, including F-16s and Chinese-made fighters, were reportedly destroyed both in the air and on the ground, along with several unmanned aerial vehicles and reconnaissance planes. Also read | Sam Altman okays AI porn on ChatGPT, says OpenAI chatbot's current version 'less enjoyable' The Pakistan Air Force attempted counterattacks using PL-15 missiles, but they failed to impact Indian forces significantly. The experience highlighted the importance of long-range indigenous missile capabilities to ensure air superiority in the region. With the Astra Mark 2’s upgraded range, India aims to maintain a strategic edge in future aerial engagements, allowing pilots to engage threats beyond visual range while keeping Indian fighter jets safely out of reach.

India’s DRDO is set to extend the range of its Astra Mark 2 air-to-air missile to over 200 km, a major boost for the Indian Air Force. Here's all you need to know.

IAF pilots may soon engage enemies before they even see them — DRDO to extend Astra Mark 2 missile's range to 200 km

New worry for India is emerging with terror groups like Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) are seen working together,&nbsp;an intel dossier indicates. ISKP is being repurposed by Pakistan's intel agency ISI to target Baloch separatists, uncooperative Taliban factions in Afghanistan, with attempts to destabilize&nbsp;J&amp;K, India. Development in a year that saw Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistan trained terrorists.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A new photo reveals ISKP’s Balochistan coordinator, Mir Shafiq Mengal, gifting a pistol to LeT commander Rana Mohammad Ashfaq,&nbsp;confirming their collaboration. Mir Shafiq Mengal has been facilitating ISKP’s operations, managing safe houses, funds, and arms in Mastung and Khuzdar camps while Ashfaq has been overseeing new terror hubs and coordinating with other extremist groups.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/motels-and-patels-once-a-source-of-pride-for-indian-americans-small-hotels-are-now-spots-of-hate-crimes-targeting-them-chandra-mouli-nagamallaiah-1759825209782">Motels and Patels: Once a source of pride for Indian Americans, small hotels are now spots of hate crimes targeting them</a>&nbsp;By 2018, ISKP established bases in Mastung and Khuzdar with ISI support. Mengal led these camps, targeting Baloch rebels and conducting cross-border attacks in Afghanistan. LeT has operated in Balochistan for years, with a training camp in Quetta (2002–2009) where Indian Mujahideen’s Yasin Bhatkal trained in 2006. The current LeT-ISKP partnership mirrors past collaborations, like LeT’s work with Al-Qaeda during the Afghan jihad.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sabarimala-gold-theft-sabarimala-sponsor-sought-leftover-temple-gold-for-girl-s-marriage-court-documents-reveal-1759824121447">Sabarimala gold theft: Sabarimala sponsor sought leftover temple gold for girl’s marriage, court documents reveal</a>&nbsp;New developments are a concern for India as an intel report indicates that ISKP’s propaganda magazine “Yalgaar" shows plans to expand attacks into Kashmir, India. This "emerging coalition of extremist entities not only intensifies the threat to Afghanistan...but also signals Pakistan Army’s intent to reignite militancy in Jammu &amp; Kashmir" thereby "destabilizing regional peace under the guise of plausible deniability", the report said.

Worry for India as ISKP and LeT working together, intel suggests

New worry for India is emerging with terror groups like Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) are seen working together, an intel dossier indicates. ISKP is being repurposed by Pakistan's intel agency ISI to target Baloch separatists, uncooperative Taliban factions in Afghanistan, with attempts to destabilize J&K, India. Development in a year that saw Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistan trained terrorists. A new photo reveals ISKP’s Balochistan coordinator, Mir Shafiq Mengal, gifting a pistol to LeT commander Rana Mohammad Ashfaq, confirming their collaboration. Mir Shafiq Mengal has been facilitating ISKP’s operations, managing safe houses, funds, and arms in Mastung and Khuzdar camps while Ashfaq has been overseeing new terror hubs and coordinating with other extremist groups. Also Read: Motels and Patels: Once a source of pride for Indian Americans, small hotels are now spots of hate crimes targeting them By 2018, ISKP established bases in Mastung and Khuzdar with ISI support. Mengal led these camps, targeting Baloch rebels and conducting cross-border attacks in Afghanistan. LeT has operated in Balochistan for years, with a training camp in Quetta (2002–2009) where Indian Mujahideen’s Yasin Bhatkal trained in 2006. The current LeT-ISKP partnership mirrors past collaborations, like LeT’s work with Al-Qaeda during the Afghan jihad. Also Read: Sabarimala gold theft: Sabarimala sponsor sought leftover temple gold for girl’s marriage, court documents reveal New developments are a concern for India as an intel report indicates that ISKP’s propaganda magazine “Yalgaar" shows plans to expand attacks into Kashmir, India. This "emerging coalition of extremist entities not only intensifies the threat to Afghanistan...but also signals Pakistan Army’s intent to reignite militancy in Jammu & Kashmir" thereby "destabilizing regional peace under the guise of plausible deniability", the report said.

A new photo reveals ISKP’s Balochistan coordinator, Mir Shafiq Mengal, gifting a pistol to LeT commander Rana Mohammad Ashfaq,&nbsp;confirming their collaboration

India has once again taken a firm stance against Pakistan at the United Nations, during a Security Council debate focused on women, peace, and security. In his speech, India’s permanent representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, accused Pakistan of continuing its ‘delusional tirades’ against India, particularly regarding Jammu and Kashmir. Harish remarked that Pakistan’s unrelenting claims over Kashmir were baseless and urged the international community to see through Pakistan’s manipulation.&nbsp;&nbsp;He also condemned Islamabad for its dismal record on women’s rights, highlighting the country's historical violations. "Pakistan’s claims are an exercise in hyperbole, designed to mislead the world,” Harish said. He referred to Pakistan’s 1971 military operation, Operation Searchlight, as an example of Pakistan’s disregard for human rights, citing the systematic genocide and mass rape of over 400,000 women by Pakistani forces during the operation.<h2>Watch the video here</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | At the UNSC Open Debate on Women Peace and Security, Permanent Representative of India to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish says, &quot;Every year, we are unfortunately fated to listen to the delusional tirade of Pakistan against my country, especially on Jammu and Kashmir, the… <a href="https://t.co/KngC3ku98O">pic.twitter.com/KngC3ku98O</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1975353360430866834?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 7, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Indian diplomat’s remarks came in response to a speech by Pakistan’s counsellor at the UN, Saima Saleem, who discussed the suffering of Kashmiri women under Indian rule. Saleem claimed that sexual violence in Kashmir has been used as a weapon of war for decades, and emphasised the role of international organisations such as Human Rights Watch in documenting these alleged violations. Saleem also argued that excluding Kashmiri women from the women, peace, and security agenda undermines the legitimacy of the UN’s work, as the Jammu and Kashmir dispute is a central issue for the Security Council.<h2>What was Operation Searchlight?</h2>Operation Searchlight was a military operation conducted by the Pakistani Army in 1971, aimed at quelling the independence movement in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). The operation resulted in the deaths of between 300,000 to 3,000,000 people, with reports of mass sexual violence and systemic rape affecting up to 400,000 women. The atrocities of Operation Searchlight prompted millions of refugees to flee to neighbouring India, which intervened militarily in support of East Pakistan’s independence, leading to the creation of Bangladesh.<h2>India’s rebuke of Pakistan’s PM at UN</h2>This latest verbal exchange comes after India sharply criticised Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif at the UN General Assembly. Sharif presented wrong facts regarding Operation Sindoor and Pakistan's supposed victory during the May standoff between the two countries.

India strongly criticised Pakistan at the UN, slamming its hypocrisy on women’s rights and reiterating Kashmir’s status as Indian territory during a UNSC debate

India has once again taken a firm stance against Pakistan at the United Nations, during a Security Council debate focused on women, peace, and security. In his speech, India’s permanent representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, accused Pakistan of continuing its ‘delusional tirades’ against India, particularly regarding Jammu and Kashmir. Harish remarked that Pakistan’s unrelenting claims over Kashmir were baseless and urged the international community to see through Pakistan’s manipulation. He also condemned Islamabad for its dismal record on women’s rights, highlighting the country's historical violations. "Pakistan’s claims are an exercise in hyperbole, designed to mislead the world,” Harish said. He referred to Pakistan’s 1971 military operation, Operation Searchlight, as an example of Pakistan’s disregard for human rights, citing the systematic genocide and mass rape of over 400,000 women by Pakistani forces during the operation. Watch the video here

India strongly criticised Pakistan at the UN, slamming its hypocrisy on women’s rights and reiterating Kashmir’s status as Indian territory during a UNSC debate

'Every year, the same tired...': India fires back at Pakistan at United Nations over remarks on Kashmir and women's rights

India on Friday (Sep 26) slammed Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's speech at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), accusing Islamabad of glorifying terrorism and peddling falsehoods. Exercising India’s right of reply, Petal Gahlot, first secretary at India’s Permanent Mission to the UN, delivered a sharp rebuttal. Calling Shehbaz's speech "absurd theatrics", the Indian representative pointed out that Pakistan sheltered al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden for a decade before the United States neutralised him at a walled compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, for masterminding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/pakistan/shehbaz-sharif-misuses-unga-speech-to-peddle-kashmir-propaganda-cry-foul-over-indus-waters-treaty-suspension-stays-silent-on-pakistan-terror-links-1758935127154">Pak PM misuses UNGA speech to spin Kashmir lies, slam India’s Indus Treaty move</a><h2>Pakistan's ‘absurd theatrics’</h2>“This assembly witnessed absurd theatrics in the morning from the Prime Minister of Pakistan, who once again glorified terrorism that is so central to their foreign policy. However, no degree of drama and no level of lies can conceal the facts,” said Indian diplomat Petal Gahlot.Watch what India said here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | New York | Exercising the right of reply of India on Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif&#39;s speech, Indian diplomat Petal Gahlot says, &quot;Mr President, this assembly witnessed absurd theatrics in the morning from the Prime Minister of Pakistan, who once again glorified terrorism… <a href="https://t.co/ALR2AnDoA9">pic.twitter.com/ALR2AnDoA9</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1971747078024946070?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

She cited India’s Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror complexes in Bahawalpur and Muridke. “A picture speaks a thousand words, and we saw many pictures of terrorists slain in Bahawalpur and Muridke terror complexes by Indian forces during Operation Sindoor. When senior Pakistani military and civilian officials publicly glorify and pay homage to such notorious terrorists, can there be any doubt about the proclivities of this regime?” she asked.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/melania-trump-snubs-olena-zelenska-at-unga-ignores-ukrainian-first-lady-s-plea-for-abducted-children-1758701214520">Melania Trump snubs Olena Zelenska at UNGA; ignores Ukrainian first lady’s plea for abducted children</a>On Sharif’s account of the recent conflict with India, Gahlot countered: “The Prime Minister of Pakistan also advanced a bizarre account of the recent conflict with India. The record on this matter is clear. Till 9th May, Pakistan was threatening more attacks on India. But on 10th May, the military pleaded with us directly for a cessation to the fighting.”<h2>Pakistan sheltered Bin Laden for a decade</h2>The Indian diplomat then pointed out how Pakistan glorifies terrorism and even sheltered 9/11 attack mastermind Osama bin Laden for a decade. Calling Pakistan a country “steeped in the tradition of deploying and exporting terrorism,” she said that Islamabad “has no shame in advancing the most ludicrous narratives to that end”.She called out Pakistan for sheltering “Osama bin Laden for a decade, even while pretending to partner in the war against terrorism” and pointed out that its ministers recently admitted to running terror camps for decades. “It should come as no surprise that once again this duplicity continues, this time at the level of its Prime Minister,” said the Indian representative.

India has called Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif for his ‘absurd theatrics’ at the UNGA. Accusing Pakistan of using the global platform to promote falsehoods and glorify terrorism, India pointed out that Pakistan sheltered al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden for a decade.

India on Friday (Sep 26) slammed Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's speech at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), accusing Islamabad of glorifying terrorism and peddling falsehoods. Exercising India’s right of reply, Petal Gahlot, first secretary at India’s Permanent Mission to the UN, delivered a sharp rebuttal. Calling Shehbaz's speech "absurd theatrics", the Indian representative pointed out that Pakistan sheltered al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden for a decade before the United States neutralised him at a walled compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, for masterminding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Also read | Pak PM misuses UNGA speech to spin Kashmir lies, slam India’s Indus Treaty move Pakistan's ‘absurd theatrics’ “This assembly witnessed absurd theatrics in the morning from the Prime Minister of Pakistan, who once again glorified terrorism that is so central to their foreign policy. However, no degree of drama and no level of lies can conceal the facts,” said Indian diplomat Petal Gahlot. Watch what India said here:

India has called Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif for his ‘absurd theatrics’ at the UNGA. Accusing Pakistan of using the global platform to promote falsehoods and glorify terrorism, India pointed out that Pakistan sheltered al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden for a decade.

'No shame': India tears into Shehbaz Sharif at UNGA, calls speech 'absurd theatrics,' points out Pakistan glorifies terror, sheltered Bin Laden

India on Wednesday (September 10) asked key Shanghai cooperation organisation or SCO anti terror body to "hold accountable the sponsors, organisers and financiers" of the Pahalgam terror attack. Speaking at the 44th&nbsp;meeting of Council of Regional Anti Terrorist Structure (RATS) in Cholpon Ata, Kyrgyz Republic, India's deputy National security advisor TV Ravichandran asked member countries to shun double standards and fight terrorism in all its "all forms and manifestations".&nbsp;The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) is a permanent organ of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), established to coordinate efforts among member states to combat terrorism, separatism, and extremism, often referred to as the "Three Evils." Headquartered in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, RATS was formalized during a 2002 SCO meeting in Saint Petersburg and became operational in 2004. Its primary role is to enhance collective security through intelligence sharing, counterterrorism coordination, and joint initiatives.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-offers-help-to-switzerland-on-racism-rejects-claims-on-minorities-1757517026511">India offers help to Switzerland on racism; rejects claims on minorities</a>&nbsp;The RATS meeting earlier on Wednesday, strongly condemning the Pahalgam terror attack. The body also&nbsp; endorsed the statement on the condemnation of Pahalgam Terror Attack in the Tianjin Declaration signed earlier this month during the SCO Summit in China. SCO is the latest global grouping to condemn the terror attack, after groupings like BRICS, Quad condemned it.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The Pahalgam terror attack was the deadliest attack on civilians in India since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, resulting in the deaths of 26 people, mostly tourists (25 Indians and one Nepali), with many others injured. The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), claimed responsibility for the attack. Terror groups based out of Pakistan, and territories under its occupation have multiple times conducted terror attacks in India in the past. India responded to the Pahalgam terror attack by Operation Sindoor that saw strikes on major terror headquarters in the country.

India asks SCO anti-terror body to hold Pahalgam attack organisers accountable

India on Wednesday (September 10) asked key Shanghai cooperation organisation or SCO anti terror body to "hold accountable the sponsors, organisers and financiers" of the Pahalgam terror attack. Speaking at the 44th meeting of Council of Regional Anti Terrorist Structure (RATS) in Cholpon Ata, Kyrgyz Republic, India's deputy National security advisor TV Ravichandran asked member countries to shun double standards and fight terrorism in all its "all forms and manifestations". The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) is a permanent organ of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), established to coordinate efforts among member states to combat terrorism, separatism, and extremism, often referred to as the "Three Evils." Headquartered in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, RATS was formalized during a 2002 SCO meeting in Saint Petersburg and became operational in 2004. Its primary role is to enhance collective security through intelligence sharing, counterterrorism coordination, and joint initiatives. Also Read: India offers help to Switzerland on racism; rejects claims on minorities The RATS meeting earlier on Wednesday, strongly condemning the Pahalgam terror attack. The body also endorsed the statement on the condemnation of Pahalgam Terror Attack in the Tianjin Declaration signed earlier this month during the SCO Summit in China. SCO is the latest global grouping to condemn the terror attack, after groupings like BRICS, Quad condemned it. The Pahalgam terror attack was the deadliest attack on civilians in India since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, resulting in the deaths of 26 people, mostly tourists (25 Indians and one Nepali), with many others injured. The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), claimed responsibility for the attack. Terror groups based out of Pakistan, and territories under its occupation have multiple times conducted terror attacks in India in the past. India responded to the Pahalgam terror attack by Operation Sindoor that saw strikes on major terror headquarters in the country.

The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) is a permanent organ of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), established to coordinate efforts among member states to combat terrorism, separatism, and extremism, often referred to as the 'Three Evils'

Jyoti Malhotra, the YouTuber from Hisar, has been named in a charge sheet by Haryana Police. Malhotra, a 33-year-old YouTuber, was arrested in May for allegedly spying for Pakistan. Haryana Police filed the charge sheet after completing its investigation into the alleged espionage case involving suspected links to Pakistani intelligence agencies, officials said Saturday (Aug 16). The court has fixed the next hearing for August 18. Malhotra, who runs the travel vlog channel 'Travel with Jo' with over 480 videos, including from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Thailand, was arrested in May this year after central agencies flagged her alleged contacts with Pakistani officials.<h2>Jyoti Malhotra to be taken to protection remand?</h2>Investigations revealed she had travelled to Pakistan multiple times and was in touch with personnel from the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi, including an official later expelled by India. According to officials, she allegedly met a Pakistani officer, Ahsan-ur-Rahim, in Delhi and shared sensitive information.Her lawyer, Advocate Kumar Mukesh, confirmed that the chargesheet has been filed and said they will review whether it contains evidence before moving a bail application. "The investigation against Jyoti has been completed, and a chargesheet has been filed in court. Now, the court has scheduled the next appearance for 18 August. Possibly, Jyoti will be taken to protection remand, and as per the rule process, the chargesheet copy will be provided to Jyoti..." he told ANI."We will review the chargesheet to determine if it contains any evidence, and based on that, we will prepare for the date application. As of now, the police do not disclose any information regarding her connection with ISI..." he added.<h2>Ahsan-ur-Rahim: Jyoti Malhotra's handler?</h2>Malhotra was one of the 12 people arrested across Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh in a coordinated crackdown on a suspected spy ring that sought to recruit Indian social media influencers.During the investigation, Malhotra, as per reports, revealed that in 2023, she visited the Delhi High Commission, where she met a man named Ahsan-ur-Rahim, alias Danish. The exact nature of communication between Malhotra and Ahsan-ur-Rahim is yet to be released. Hisar SP Shashank Kumar Sawan earlier said Malhotra had visited Pakistan multiple times and China once, and her travel records were inconsistent with her income. "Modern warfare is not only fought on the border. The PIOs are trying to recruit some social media influencers, and they use that to push their narrative. We received inputs from the central agencies, and we arrested Jyoti Malhotra," he said at the time. &nbsp;

Haryana Police filed a charge sheet against Hisar YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, accused of spying for Pakistan. Arrested in May, she allegedly met Pakistani officers and shared sensitive info. Court hearing is set for Aug 18.

Jyoti Malhotra, the YouTuber from Hisar, has been named in a charge sheet by Haryana Police. Malhotra, a 33-year-old YouTuber, was arrested in May for allegedly spying for Pakistan. Haryana Police filed the charge sheet after completing its investigation into the alleged espionage case involving suspected links to Pakistani intelligence agencies, officials said Saturday (Aug 16). The court has fixed the next hearing for August 18. Malhotra, who runs the travel vlog channel 'Travel with Jo' with over 480 videos, including from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Thailand, was arrested in May this year after central agencies flagged her alleged contacts with Pakistani officials. Jyoti Malhotra to be taken to protection remand? Investigations revealed she had travelled to Pakistan multiple times and was in touch with personnel from the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi, including an official later expelled by India. According to officials, she allegedly met a Pakistani officer, Ahsan-ur-Rahim, in Delhi and shared sensitive information. Her lawyer, Advocate Kumar Mukesh, confirmed that the chargesheet has been filed and said they will review whether it contains evidence before moving a bail application. "The investigation against Jyoti has been completed, and a chargesheet has been filed in court. Now, the court has scheduled the next appearance for 18 August. Possibly, Jyoti will be taken to protection remand, and as per the rule process, the chargesheet copy will be provided to Jyoti..." he told ANI. "We will review the chargesheet to determine if it contains any evidence, and based on that, we will prepare for the date application. As of now, the police do not disclose any information regarding her connection with ISI..." he added. Ahsan-ur-Rahim: Jyoti Malhotra's handler? Malhotra was one of the 12 people arrested across Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh in a coordinated crackdown on a suspected spy ring that sought to recruit Indian social media influencers. During the investigation, Malhotra, as per reports, revealed that in 2023, she visited the Delhi High Commission, where she met a man named Ahsan-ur-Rahim, alias Danish. The exact nature of communication between Malhotra and Ahsan-ur-Rahim is yet to be released. Hisar SP Shashank Kumar Sawan earlier said Malhotra had visited Pakistan multiple times and China once, and her travel records were inconsistent with her income. "Modern warfare is not only fought on the border. The PIOs are trying to recruit some social media influencers, and they use that to push their narrative. We received inputs from the central agencies, and we arrested Jyoti Malhotra," he said at the time.

Haryana Police filed a charge sheet against Hisar YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, accused of spying for Pakistan. Arrested in May, she allegedly met Pakistani officers and shared sensitive info. Court hearing is set for Aug 18.

‘Travel with Jo’ YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra charge-sheeted for allegedly spying for Pakistan

Pakistan on Monday (August 11) has rejected India's statement on Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir's "nuclear blackmail" during his US visit, calling it "misleading" and "self-serving construct". Pakistan's Foreign Affairs Ministry in a statement vowed a "matching response" to India's aggression.&nbsp;Responding to media queries regarding the statement made by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs, Pakistan's Foreign Affairs Ministry called India's remarks “immature and misleading”.&nbsp;This comes after Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, on Sunday made a nuclear threat against India and the world. During his visit to the US, he warned that if his country were ever pushed to the brink in a conflict with India, it would "take half the world down" with it.In a sharp response to Munir, India's Ministry of External Affairs said that “nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade.” The MEA said that the international community can draw its own conclusions over the irresponsible remark made by Asim Munir during his visit to the United States.Further, India stressed that Munir's statement raises doubts about the integrity of nuclear weapons and their control and stated that “the military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups” in Pakistan.&nbsp;Vowing to take immediate action, Pakistan today stressed, "Any act of Indian aggression or violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity will be met with an immediate and matching response. The onus of any ensuing escalation will rest squarely with the Indian leadership."As opposed to Munir's remark, Pakistan added that they are a "responsible nuclear weapon state" with an elaborate command and control structure under full civilian control.Further responding to India's remarks, the Pakistan foreign ministry stated, “The Indian MEA's spurious insinuations are irresponsible and without a shred of evidence. We also note with concern a pointless reference to the third countries, in a bid to exert pressure on Pakistan.”

Pakistan's Foreign Affairs Ministry called India's remarks "immature", saying that it is "another demonstration of their chronic tendency to distort facts and twist statements out of context."

Pakistan on Monday (August 11) has rejected India's statement on Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir's "nuclear blackmail" during his US visit, calling it "misleading" and "self-serving construct". Pakistan's Foreign Affairs Ministry in a statement vowed a "matching response" to India's aggression. Responding to media queries regarding the statement made by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs, Pakistan's Foreign Affairs Ministry called India's remarks “immature and misleading”. This comes after Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, on Sunday made a nuclear threat against India and the world. During his visit to the US, he warned that if his country were ever pushed to the brink in a conflict with India, it would "take half the world down" with it. In a sharp response to Munir, India's Ministry of External Affairs said that “nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade.” The MEA said that the international community can draw its own conclusions over the irresponsible remark made by Asim Munir during his visit to the United States. Further, India stressed that Munir's statement raises doubts about the integrity of nuclear weapons and their control and stated that “the military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups” in Pakistan. Vowing to take immediate action, Pakistan today stressed, "Any act of Indian aggression or violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity will be met with an immediate and matching response. The onus of any ensuing escalation will rest squarely with the Indian leadership." As opposed to Munir's remark, Pakistan added that they are a "responsible nuclear weapon state" with an elaborate command and control structure under full civilian control. Further responding to India's remarks, the Pakistan foreign ministry stated, “The Indian MEA's spurious insinuations are irresponsible and without a shred of evidence. We also note with concern a pointless reference to the third countries, in a bid to exert pressure on Pakistan.”

&nbsp;Pakistan's Foreign Affairs Ministry called India's remarks "immature", saying that it is "another demonstration of their chronic tendency to distort facts and twist statements out of context."

Pakistan reacts to India's statement on Asim Munir's 'nuclear blackmail'; vows matching response to 'aggression'

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Saturday credited India's political will for the success of Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, saying no restrictions were put on the military. Speaking in Bengaluru, the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief further said that the military got full freedom to respond to Pakistan's attack on civilian areas and military installations.&nbsp;"A key reason for success was the presence of political will. There were very clear directions given to us. No restrictions were put on us... If there were any constraints, they were self-made...We decided how much to escalate...We had full freedom to plan and execute. Our attacks were calibrated because we wanted to be mature about it...There was a synchronisation between the three forces...The post of CDS made a real difference. He was there to get us together...NSA also played a big role in getting all the agencies," he said.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/how-many-pakistani-jets-did-india-shoot-down-and-how-iaf-chief-reveals-1754726147198">Also read: How many Pakistani jets did India shoot down during Operation Sindoor and how? IAF chief reveals</a>&nbsp;He said that the Indian&nbsp;forces downed at least six Pakistani planes.&nbsp;He also revealed the rationale behind not escalating the conflict further.&nbsp;"People got down to their egos in the war...Once we achieved our objective, we should have looked for all windows of opportunity to stop...Some people very close to me said, 'Aur maarna tha'. But can we continue to be at war?... The nation has taken a good decision," said the officer.&nbsp;Reminiscing about the Balakot strike, ACM AP Singh said that this time, the Indian forces had intelligence about the damage they wreaked in Pakistan.&nbsp;“In Balakot, we could not get anything from inside, and it became a big issue trying to tell our people, unfortunately, as to what we have been able to achieve. We had intelligence of what had gone on inside, had a human kind of intelligence where we had a very clear picture of inside in terms of there had been huge damage. There have been so many terrorists who have been neutralised, but we could not convince our people that, look, we have achieved that...So I'm very happy that this time we were able to take care of that ghost of Balakot that we were able&nbsp;to tell the world what we have achieved."&nbsp;He said the Indian forces sent out the message to Pakistan that if they continued the conflict, they would sustain more damage.&nbsp;"It was a high-tech war. In 80 to 90 hours of war, we were able to achieve so much damage that it was clear to them that if they continue, they are going to pay for it more and more. So they came forward and sent a message to our DGMO that they wanted to talk. This was accepted on our side," he added.

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Saturday credited India's political will for the success of Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, saying no restrictions were put on the military.

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Saturday credited India's political will for the success of Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, saying no restrictions were put on the military. Speaking in Bengaluru, the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief further said that the military got full freedom to respond to Pakistan's attack on civilian areas and military installations. "A key reason for success was the presence of political will. There were very clear directions given to us. No restrictions were put on us... If there were any constraints, they were self-made...We decided how much to escalate...We had full freedom to plan and execute. Our attacks were calibrated because we wanted to be mature about it...There was a synchronisation between the three forces...The post of CDS made a real difference. He was there to get us together...NSA also played a big role in getting all the agencies," he said. Also read: How many Pakistani jets did India shoot down during Operation Sindoor and how? IAF chief reveals He said that the Indian forces downed at least six Pakistani planes. He also revealed the rationale behind not escalating the conflict further. "People got down to their egos in the war...Once we achieved our objective, we should have looked for all windows of opportunity to stop...Some people very close to me said, 'Aur maarna tha'. But can we continue to be at war?... The nation has taken a good decision," said the officer. Reminiscing about the Balakot strike, ACM AP Singh said that this time, the Indian forces had intelligence about the damage they wreaked in Pakistan. “In Balakot, we could not get anything from inside, and it became a big issue trying to tell our people, unfortunately, as to what we have been able to achieve. We had intelligence of what had gone on inside, had a human kind of intelligence where we had a very clear picture of inside in terms of there had been huge damage. There have been so many terrorists who have been neutralised, but we could not convince our people that, look, we have achieved that...So I'm very happy that this time we were able to take care of that ghost of Balakot that we were able to tell the world what we have achieved." He said the Indian forces sent out the message to Pakistan that if they continued the conflict, they would sustain more damage. "It was a high-tech war. In 80 to 90 hours of war, we were able to achieve so much damage that it was clear to them that if they continue, they are going to pay for it more and more. So they came forward and sent a message to our DGMO that they wanted to talk. This was accepted on our side," he added.

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh said the Indian forces downed at least 6 Pakistani aircraft during Operation Sindoor.

'We had full freedom': IAF chief lauds 'political will' during Operation Sindoor

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Saturday revealed the extent of damage the Indian military wreaked on the Pakistan&nbsp;Air Force during Operation Sindoor in May. He said the Indian forces downed at least five Pakistani fighter jets and another large aircraft during the four-day-long conflict. While six aircraft were shot down in the air, at least two were destroyed on the ground.&nbsp;Among the likely Pakistani casualties was an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS), which was crucial for Pakistan's air strength.&nbsp;"We have at least five fighters' confirmed kills and one large aircraft, which could be either an ELINT aircraft or an AEW &amp;C aircraft, which was taken on at a distance of about 300 kilometres. This is the largest ever recorded surface-to-air kill that we can talk about," he said.&nbsp;Air Chief Marshal Singh, speaking at the annual 16th Air Chief Marshal LM Katre Lecture in Bengaluru, said the Russia-made S-400 air defence system shot down the Pakistani aircraft.&nbsp;"Our air defence systems have done a wonderful job. The S-400 system, which we recently bought, has been a game-changer. The range of that system has kept their aircraft away from their weapons like those long-range glide bombs that they have; they have not been able to use any one of those because they have not been able to penetrate the system," he added.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">IAF Chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh, speaking on Operation Sindoor, revealed that India shot down at least five Pakistani fighter jets and one large surveillance aircraft, possibly an ELINT or AEW&amp;C, at a range of 300 km — marking the longest recorded surface-to-air kill in… <a href="https://t.co/WOpfasxdJl">pic.twitter.com/WOpfasxdJl</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1954097038041211102?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;In May, India destroyed nine terrorist bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Islamabad reacted with attacks on Indian civilian areas and military installations. The Indian military thwarted most of these attacks and later attacked air bases deep inside Pakistan.&nbsp;After four days of intense conflict, Pakistan's DGMO was forced to call his Indian counterpart, urging a cessation of hostilities.&nbsp;ACM AP Singh said none of the Pakistani aircraft could come close to the Indian borders because of India's robust air defence.&nbsp;"None of their aircraft could come anywhere near the boundaries of Akash and even MRSAM. All their aircraft were taken on by LRSAM because they were trying to stay away, but still, they were within our range at times, and that is the opportunity targets that we got. As far as our offence was concerned, that night we didn't have any hold bar and we decided that we would go attack at Pan Front, we would stretch resources. The idea was once again not to attack one particular airfield and decimate that airfield. The idea was to give him that feeling or give him that indication that look, we can attack you deep inside, at will, wherever we want to...Bholari, an AEW&amp;C hangar, was attacked," he added.

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Saturday revealed the extent of damage the Indian military wreaked on the Pakistan Air Force during Operation Sindoor in May.

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Saturday revealed the extent of damage the Indian military wreaked on the Pakistan Air Force during Operation Sindoor in May. He said the Indian forces downed at least five Pakistani fighter jets and another large aircraft during the four-day-long conflict. While six aircraft were shot down in the air, at least two were destroyed on the ground. Among the likely Pakistani casualties was an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS), which was crucial for Pakistan's air strength. "We have at least five fighters' confirmed kills and one large aircraft, which could be either an ELINT aircraft or an AEW &C aircraft, which was taken on at a distance of about 300 kilometres. This is the largest ever recorded surface-to-air kill that we can talk about," he said. Air Chief Marshal Singh, speaking at the annual 16th Air Chief Marshal LM Katre Lecture in Bengaluru, said the Russia-made S-400 air defence system shot down the Pakistani aircraft. "Our air defence systems have done a wonderful job. The S-400 system, which we recently bought, has been a game-changer. The range of that system has kept their aircraft away from their weapons like those long-range glide bombs that they have; they have not been able to use any one of those because they have not been able to penetrate the system," he added.

Air Chief Marshal AP Singh said that among the likely Pakistani casualties was an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS).

How many Pakistani jets did India shoot down during Operation Sindoor and how? IAF chief reveals

In the age of hyper-connectivity, truth moves swiftly — but lies move swifter. A tweet, a doctored photo, or even a single misleading statement can cascade on social media, stir emotions, and create narratives ahead of the facts catching up. Geopolitical crises and wars have never not been information wars, but now, with Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, and TikTok, speed, reach, and impact of disinformation have never been higher.&nbsp;We are an age where a tweet can either destroy or make a career. The stakes are enormous — not only for public individuals, but for regular folks whose lives can be irreparably altered by a viral lie. And the conflicts of our times — India–Pakistan tensions, the Iran–Israel conflict, the Russia–Ukraine war — have demonstrated just how perilous this online wildfire can be.<h2>Why social media is a misinformation machine?</h2>The design of social media itself is based on virality, not verification. Instant reach, no vetting: Anybody can share anything, and it could be seen by millions in minutes — without being checked. Algorithms amplify outrage: Material that evokes high emotions gets promoted to the top of a feed. Sadly, false or misleading information tends to be more emotive than accurate news. Echo chambers make the belief stronger: Individuals often follow those who share their view, and this makes misinformation "common knowledge" in those circles.&nbsp;This is fatal during times of war or crisis, when emotions are already high and people are eager to get updates.<h2>Case Studies: Misinformation in contemporary conflicts</h2>India–Pakistan: At the time of high-tension Indian–Pakistani military confrontations, manipulated videos and Photoshopped images have consistently gone viral. In 2019, during the Balakot airstrikes incident, random footage of old military operations was shared as "breaking news." Memes, fabricated quotes, and attributed statements fueled public opinion on both sides and added to the hostilities.&nbsp;Iran–Israel: When the tensions between Iran and Israel escalated, social media overflowed with mistranslations, doctored photographs, and even AI-composed "battlefield" pictures. Some of them were tweeted by popular handles and even caught by minor news websites before being corrected. When the misinformation propagated, the retractions hardly reached a quarter of the initial crowd.&nbsp;Russia–Ukraine: Few, if any, wars in the modern era have witnessed the weaponisation of disinformation as extensively as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Political figures were duped with deepfake videos, footage of past combat being recycled as "current" incidents, and made-up casualty figures were circulated extensively. These were intentionally designed by state or state-sponsored actors to manipulate narratives and shape global opinion.<h2>The reputation impact</h2>It's not only governments and militaries that are impacted. One post here can ruin a reputation in a night. Reporters have been trolled, threatened, and discredited from out-of-context screenshots or doctored quotes. Celebrities and public figures have been hammered for comments they never made — simply because someone uploaded a realistic fake. Average citizens have been "doxxed" or hassled after being mistakenly identified in viral war videos. In such a weather, silence is sometimes more secure than voice — but even silence may be seen as taking sides.<h2>The bottom line</h2>Social media is not evil by nature — but it is by nature susceptible to being manipulated. In times of war, the truth tends to get destroyed first, and algorithms that prioritise speed over accuracy only make that poorer. The world we now inhabit requires a new type of literacy: the capacity to filter fact from fiction at the pace of a scroll. Whether you are a reporter, an elected official, or simply a regular user, one post can destroy or solidify your credibility. Caveat emptor — because in this digital space, the ill-advised line at the wrong time can alter everything.&nbsp;Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

The dangerous virality: How social media fuels misinformation in times of war

In the age of hyper-connectivity, truth moves swiftly — but lies move swifter. A tweet, a doctored photo, or even a single misleading statement can cascade on social media, stir emotions, and create narratives ahead of the facts catching up. Geopolitical crises and wars have never not been information wars, but now, with Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, and TikTok, speed, reach, and impact of disinformation have never been higher. We are an age where a tweet can either destroy or make a career. The stakes are enormous — not only for public individuals, but for regular folks whose lives can be irreparably altered by a viral lie. And the conflicts of our times — India–Pakistan tensions, the Iran–Israel conflict, the Russia–Ukraine war — have demonstrated just how perilous this online wildfire can be. Why social media is a misinformation machine? The design of social media itself is based on virality, not verification. Instant reach, no vetting: Anybody can share anything, and it could be seen by millions in minutes — without being checked. Algorithms amplify outrage: Material that evokes high emotions gets promoted to the top of a feed. Sadly, false or misleading information tends to be more emotive than accurate news. Echo chambers make the belief stronger: Individuals often follow those who share their view, and this makes misinformation "common knowledge" in those circles. This is fatal during times of war or crisis, when emotions are already high and people are eager to get updates. Case Studies: Misinformation in contemporary conflicts India–Pakistan: At the time of high-tension Indian–Pakistani military confrontations, manipulated videos and Photoshopped images have consistently gone viral. In 2019, during the Balakot airstrikes incident, random footage of old military operations was shared as "breaking news." Memes, fabricated quotes, and attributed statements fueled public opinion on both sides and added to the hostilities. Iran–Israel: When the tensions between Iran and Israel escalated, social media overflowed with mistranslations, doctored photographs, and even AI-composed "battlefield" pictures. Some of them were tweeted by popular handles and even caught by minor news websites before being corrected. When the misinformation propagated, the retractions hardly reached a quarter of the initial crowd. Russia–Ukraine: Few, if any, wars in the modern era have witnessed the weaponisation of disinformation as extensively as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Political figures were duped with deepfake videos, footage of past combat being recycled as "current" incidents, and made-up casualty figures were circulated extensively. These were intentionally designed by state or state-sponsored actors to manipulate narratives and shape global opinion. The reputation impact It's not only governments and militaries that are impacted. One post here can ruin a reputation in a night. Reporters have been trolled, threatened, and discredited from out-of-context screenshots or doctored quotes. Celebrities and public figures have been hammered for comments they never made — simply because someone uploaded a realistic fake. Average citizens have been "doxxed" or hassled after being mistakenly identified in viral war videos. In such a weather, silence is sometimes more secure than voice — but even silence may be seen as taking sides. The bottom line Social media is not evil by nature — but it is by nature susceptible to being manipulated. In times of war, the truth tends to get destroyed first, and algorithms that prioritise speed over accuracy only make that poorer. The world we now inhabit requires a new type of literacy: the capacity to filter fact from fiction at the pace of a scroll. Whether you are a reporter, an elected official, or simply a regular user, one post can destroy or solidify your credibility. Caveat emptor — because in this digital space, the ill-advised line at the wrong time can alter everything. Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

The design of social media itself is based on virality, not verification. Instant reach, no vetting: Anybody can share anything, and it could be seen by millions in minutes — without being checked

The monsoon session of the Indian Parliament kicks off on Monday (Jul 21). As per reports the Indian Parliament is set for a stormy monsoon session, as the opposition INDIA bloc prepares to grill the Narendra Modi government on contentious issues like national security lapses and US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of brokering a "ceasefire" between India and Pakistan during the recent tensions, to voter rights and Jammu &amp; Kashmir's statehood. Amid demands for an all-party meeting, the Centre has reportedly indicated its readiness to discuss issues of "great importance to the nation," saying it would "never shy away from a discussion".<h2>Opposition mounting an attack on the Modi government?</h2>Reports suggest that the opposition INDIA bloc, from which the Aam Aadmi Party recently exited, is gearing up to confront the government on a raft of issues it claims are being mishandled or suppressed. At the heart of the opposition's agenda is the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and the Indian military's subsequent response—Operation Sindoor. The INDIA alliance is demanding answers from Prime Minister Narendra Modi on both the operation and what it calls a glaring intelligence failure that led to the death of 26 civilians.In an online strategy meeting on Saturday, 24 opposition parties have agreed to a joint plan to target the government over at least eight key concerns. These include Trump's controversial claim of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar and the delayed restoration of full statehood to Jammu &amp; Kashmir.Congress MP and Rajya Sabha deputy leader Pramod Tiwari said the Opposition would insist that PM Modi address these matters in the House. "Parliament is more important than travelling abroad," said Tiwari in a conversation with PTI. "All leaders have expressed concern that all the terrorists behind the attack are free and no action has been taken against them despite so many days having passed since April 22. Now, a confession has also come that it was an intelligence failure. So this will be raised," he noted.Slamming the Modi government for what he said was an "undeclared emergency", the Congress MP said, "There is a threat to the voting rights of people under the ‘undeclared emergency’ that is prevalent in the country...The manner in which vote-bandi is taking place in Bihar, after note-bandi, is against democracy".<h2>Govt open to discussion—will PM Modi address the opposition's concerns?</h2>Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government was ready to discuss all issues of national interest, including Operation Sindoor and Trump’s statements. "The government will never shy away from a discussion...will respond appropriately in Parliament" Rijiju told reporters but said whether the PM himself responds or another minister speaks will be decided later. "When we start discussing the matter, we will make a statement. Whether it is the US President or anyone, I can’t give any reply now. When there is a discussion, a reply will be given," he said.According to a PTI report, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is expected to make a detailed statement on Operation Sindoor. Singh chaired two high-level meetings last Friday—one with military chiefs and another with key ministers—where the security situation and follow-up strategy were discussed.

Reports suggest that the opposition INDIA bloc, from which the Aam Aadmi Party recently exited, is gearing up to confront the government on a raft of issues it claims are being mishandled or suppressed. 

The monsoon session of the Indian Parliament kicks off on Monday (Jul 21). As per reports the Indian Parliament is set for a stormy monsoon session, as the opposition INDIA bloc prepares to grill the Narendra Modi government on contentious issues like national security lapses and US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of brokering a "ceasefire" between India and Pakistan during the recent tensions, to voter rights and Jammu & Kashmir's statehood. Amid demands for an all-party meeting, the Centre has reportedly indicated its readiness to discuss issues of "great importance to the nation," saying it would "never shy away from a discussion". Opposition mounting an attack on the Modi government? Reports suggest that the opposition INDIA bloc, from which the Aam Aadmi Party recently exited, is gearing up to confront the government on a raft of issues it claims are being mishandled or suppressed. At the heart of the opposition's agenda is the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and the Indian military's subsequent response—Operation Sindoor. The INDIA alliance is demanding answers from Prime Minister Narendra Modi on both the operation and what it calls a glaring intelligence failure that led to the death of 26 civilians. In an online strategy meeting on Saturday, 24 opposition parties have agreed to a joint plan to target the government over at least eight key concerns. These include Trump's controversial claim of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar and the delayed restoration of full statehood to Jammu & Kashmir. Congress MP and Rajya Sabha deputy leader Pramod Tiwari said the Opposition would insist that PM Modi address these matters in the House. "Parliament is more important than travelling abroad," said Tiwari in a conversation with PTI. "All leaders have expressed concern that all the terrorists behind the attack are free and no action has been taken against them despite so many days having passed since April 22. Now, a confession has also come that it was an intelligence failure. So this will be raised," he noted. Slamming the Modi government for what he said was an "undeclared emergency", the Congress MP said, "There is a threat to the voting rights of people under the ‘undeclared emergency’ that is prevalent in the country...The manner in which vote-bandi is taking place in Bihar, after note-bandi, is against democracy". Govt open to discussion—will PM Modi address the opposition's concerns? Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government was ready to discuss all issues of national interest, including Operation Sindoor and Trump’s statements. "The government will never shy away from a discussion...will respond appropriately in Parliament" Rijiju told reporters but said whether the PM himself responds or another minister speaks will be decided later. "When we start discussing the matter, we will make a statement. Whether it is the US President or anyone, I can’t give any reply now. When there is a discussion, a reply will be given," he said. According to a PTI report, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is expected to make a detailed statement on Operation Sindoor. Singh chaired two high-level meetings last Friday—one with military chiefs and another with key ministers—where the security situation and follow-up strategy were discussed.

Reports suggest that the opposition INDIA bloc, from which the Aam Aadmi Party recently exited, is gearing up to confront the government on a raft of issues it claims are being mishandled or suppressed.&nbsp;

'Vote bandi': Opposition to grill Modi government on Pahalgam, Trump,  and more during Parliament Monsoon session

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Saturday (Jul 12) ruled out the possibility of nuclear escalation during the recent cross-border conflict with India, stating that Islamabad's nuclear arsenal was solely for "peaceful purposes and self-defence". Speaking to a group of students in Islamabad, Sharif said Pakistan responded to Indian military strikes with "full might" during the four-day confrontation, which followed the deadly April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, India, that killed 26 civilians. The Pakistani PM also revealed the number of casualties Pakistan suffered in the conflict with India.<h2>'Not for aggression'</h2>The Pakistani prime minister said that Islamabad's nuclear programme was "solely for peaceful purposes and national defence, not for aggression." Looking back at the four-day military confrontation with neighbour India, he claimed that 55 Pakistanis were killed during Indian military strikes under Operation Sindoor — a coordinated offensive targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The strikes on May 7 targeted nine terror hubs, including in Bahawalpur, a known stronghold of the banned Jaish-e-Mohammad group. The operation was New Delhi's response to what it called "state-enabled terrorism" following the Pahalgam terror attack.His statement comes as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier said that India will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail.<h2>Modi: "India will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail"</h2>In May, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it clear that India "will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail" while responding to terrorism emanating from across the border. He said that India has set a "new normal" in responding to terror attacks by hitting back in a way that terrorists understand. “Talks and terror cannot go together, terror and trade cannot go together, and water and blood cannot go together,” he had said during the televised address. Meanwhile, Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has posed the idea that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal should be under the surveillance of the UN's atomic energy agency: "I wanted to raise this question for the world: are nuclear weapons safe in the hands of a rogue and irresponsible nation?" he said, adding "I believe that Pakistan's atomic weapons should be brought under the surveillance of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)".&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;

Speaking to a group of students in Islamabad, Sharif said Pakistan responded to Indian military strikes with "full might" during the four-day confrontation. He insisted that Islamabad's nuclear programme was "solely for peaceful purposes and national defence, not for aggression." 

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Saturday (Jul 12) ruled out the possibility of nuclear escalation during the recent cross-border conflict with India, stating that Islamabad's nuclear arsenal was solely for "peaceful purposes and self-defence". Speaking to a group of students in Islamabad, Sharif said Pakistan responded to Indian military strikes with "full might" during the four-day confrontation, which followed the deadly April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, India, that killed 26 civilians. The Pakistani PM also revealed the number of casualties Pakistan suffered in the conflict with India. 'Not for aggression' The Pakistani prime minister said that Islamabad's nuclear programme was "solely for peaceful purposes and national defence, not for aggression." Looking back at the four-day military confrontation with neighbour India, he claimed that 55 Pakistanis were killed during Indian military strikes under Operation Sindoor — a coordinated offensive targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The strikes on May 7 targeted nine terror hubs, including in Bahawalpur, a known stronghold of the banned Jaish-e-Mohammad group. The operation was New Delhi's response to what it called "state-enabled terrorism" following the Pahalgam terror attack. His statement comes as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier said that India will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail. Modi: "India will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail" In May, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it clear that India "will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail" while responding to terrorism emanating from across the border. He said that India has set a "new normal" in responding to terror attacks by hitting back in a way that terrorists understand. “Talks and terror cannot go together, terror and trade cannot go together, and water and blood cannot go together,” he had said during the televised address. Meanwhile, Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has posed the idea that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal should be under the surveillance of the UN's atomic energy agency: "I wanted to raise this question for the world: are nuclear weapons safe in the hands of a rogue and irresponsible nation?" he said, adding "I believe that Pakistan's atomic weapons should be brought under the surveillance of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)".

Speaking to a group of students in Islamabad, Sharif said Pakistan responded to Indian military strikes with "full might" during the four-day confrontation. He insisted that Islamabad's nuclear programme was "solely for peaceful purposes and national defence, not for aggression."&nbsp;

'Nukes for peace, not aggression': Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif rules out nuclear escalation with India, admits 55 killed in Operation Sindoor

Pakistan’s former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has hinted that Pakistan would not have any issues with the extradition of 'individuals of concern if India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements.' Soon after his statement, it was pointed out that there is no extradition treaty between India and Pakistan. However, there are two ways in which Islamabad can still extradite terrorists to India: India proposed an extradition treaty with Pakistan in 2004, which Islamabad has not yet responded. India also made a formal extradition request for terrorists living in Pakistan in 2023, but Islamabad acknowledged it but has not responded positively. In fact, in both cases, it has highlighted that there is an absence of a formal extradition treaty between the two countries. However, as per international law of double criminality, individuals can be extradited even if there is no agreement on extradition agreement between the two countries. Though the process is lengthy, political will can at least start the process - something that seems highly unlikely in the current political situation in Pakistan.<h2>Bilawal Bhutto's remark about the extradition of terrorists to India</h2>Speaking to Al Jazeera, Bilawal, who also heads the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), said that such a move could be part of a “comprehensive dialogue” between the two countries, where terrorism is discussed as a key issue. "India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements that require that conviction to take place," Bilawal alleged, pointing to the need for Indian witnesses to testify in Pakistani courts. "If India is willing to be cooperative in that process, I am sure there will be no hurdle in extraditing any individual of concern", he added. "As part of a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where terrorism is one of the issues that we discuss, I am sure Pakistan would not be opposed to any of these things," he said.&nbsp;On being asked to disclose the whereabouts of Saeed and Azhar, the PPP chief said, “It is factually not correct that Hafiz Saeed is a free man; he is in the custody of the Pakistani state,” adding that Islamabad has been unable to arrest Azhar. “It is our belief that he is in Afghanistan," Bilawal said. “If and when the Indian government shares information that he is on Pakistani soil, we will be more than happy to arrest him," he added.<h2>Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar</h2>Hafiz Saeed - the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack mastermind, and Masood Azhar are among India's most wanted terrorists. Saeed is currently serving a 33-year sentence for terror financing and has reportedly been lodged in Lahore's Kot Lakhpat Jail since 2019. However, reports suggest that his jail term is a show-off by the Pakistani administration to avoid FATF blockage, while in reality, he enjoys free hand. Azhar is the mastermind of several terror attacks in India, including the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2016 Pathankot airbase strike, and the 2019 Pulwama terror attack. India released Azhar from its custody in 1999 as part of a hostage swap deal during the Flight 814 Kandahar hijack. Both LeT and JeM have been banned by Pakistan, according to the National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA). Azhar is also a UN-designated global terrorist and has been proscribed by NACTA and living in an undisclosed place for the last many years.

Bilawal Bhutto’s extradition offer has raised the same old question about extradition treaty between India and Pakistan. However, there are ways to extradite terrorists despite no extradition treaty: Find out how

Pakistan’s former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has hinted that Pakistan would not have any issues with the extradition of 'individuals of concern if India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements.' Soon after his statement, it was pointed out that there is no extradition treaty between India and Pakistan. However, there are two ways in which Islamabad can still extradite terrorists to India: India proposed an extradition treaty with Pakistan in 2004, which Islamabad has not yet responded. India also made a formal extradition request for terrorists living in Pakistan in 2023, but Islamabad acknowledged it but has not responded positively. In fact, in both cases, it has highlighted that there is an absence of a formal extradition treaty between the two countries. However, as per international law of double criminality, individuals can be extradited even if there is no agreement on extradition agreement between the two countries. Though the process is lengthy, political will can at least start the process - something that seems highly unlikely in the current political situation in Pakistan. Bilawal Bhutto's remark about the extradition of terrorists to India Speaking to Al Jazeera, Bilawal, who also heads the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), said that such a move could be part of a “comprehensive dialogue” between the two countries, where terrorism is discussed as a key issue. "India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements that require that conviction to take place," Bilawal alleged, pointing to the need for Indian witnesses to testify in Pakistani courts. "If India is willing to be cooperative in that process, I am sure there will be no hurdle in extraditing any individual of concern", he added. "As part of a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where terrorism is one of the issues that we discuss, I am sure Pakistan would not be opposed to any of these things," he said. On being asked to disclose the whereabouts of Saeed and Azhar, the PPP chief said, “It is factually not correct that Hafiz Saeed is a free man; he is in the custody of the Pakistani state,” adding that Islamabad has been unable to arrest Azhar. “It is our belief that he is in Afghanistan," Bilawal said. “If and when the Indian government shares information that he is on Pakistani soil, we will be more than happy to arrest him," he added. Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar Hafiz Saeed - the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack mastermind, and Masood Azhar are among India's most wanted terrorists. Saeed is currently serving a 33-year sentence for terror financing and has reportedly been lodged in Lahore's Kot Lakhpat Jail since 2019. However, reports suggest that his jail term is a show-off by the Pakistani administration to avoid FATF blockage, while in reality, he enjoys free hand. Azhar is the mastermind of several terror attacks in India, including the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2016 Pathankot airbase strike, and the 2019 Pulwama terror attack. India released Azhar from its custody in 1999 as part of a hostage swap deal during the Flight 814 Kandahar hijack. Both LeT and JeM have been banned by Pakistan, according to the National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA). Azhar is also a UN-designated global terrorist and has been proscribed by NACTA and living in an undisclosed place for the last many years.

<h2>Bilawal Bhutto’s extradition offer has raised the same old question about extradition treaty between India and Pakistan. However, there are ways to extradite terrorists despite no extradition treaty: Find out how</h2>

Pakistan can extradite Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar to India despite no extradition treaty: HERE'S HOW

india-pakistan

India Pakistan, News on India Pakistan, stories on India Pakistan, articles on India Pakistan, India Pakistan stories at Wion, India Pakistan news, India Pakistan latest news

india pakistan

Operation Sindoor Anniversary: IAF Shares Special Video On First Anniversary

Track 2 channels active between India and Pakistan even as ties remain in freeze

Pakistan pushes 'false flag' narrative before Pahalgam terror attack anniversary

India slams Pakistan at UN for 'fabricating imaginative tales of Islamophobia'

India slams Pakistan at UNHRC, says Islamabad living in ‘la la land’

Donald Trump Says 11 Jets Shot Down During India-Pak Hostilities Last Year

T20 World Cup: What Pakistan Could Lose If It Boycotts India

Pakistan claims killed 145 ‘Indian-backed terrorists,’ but offers no proof

India's air superiority in Op Sindoor forced Pak for ceasefire: Swiss think tank

Freedom At Midnight S2 arrives when India needs its secular memory the most

India slams Pakistan for raising Kashmir issue at UN General Assembly

Op Sindoor: LeT Commander Accepts Damage to Mudrike Hideout

India blocks Pakistani outlet Asia One channel, known for spreading propaganda

Donald Trump: I Settled India-Pakistan War Without Nuclear Weapons

Baloch leader says India faces unimaginable Pak threat, flags China involvement

'Democracy and Pakistan don't...': India reacts to Pakistan’s political crisis

John Kiriakou fires back at Imran Khan's party: 'I wipe my a** with your...'

Pakistan Fast Bowler Haris Rauf Suspended After Asia Cup Code Breaches

Indian skies just got deadlier: Astra Mark 2 missiles to hit targets 200 km away

Worry for India as ISKP and LeT working together, intel suggests

'Every year, the same tired...': India fires back at Pakistan at United Nations

India to Pakistan at UNGA: Stop peddling lies, remember you hid Osama bin Laden

India asks SCO anti-terror body to hold Pahalgam attack organisers accountable

YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra charge-sheeted for allegedly spying for Pakistan

Pakistan reacts to India's statement on Asim Munir's 'nuclear blackmail'

'We had full freedom': IAF chief lauds 'political will' during Operation Sindoor