The Supreme Court has deferred the hearing of the pleas against CEC Gyanesh Kumar by 10 days. &nbsp;The time has been given to petitioners, including Rahul Gandhi, to file responses to the ECI affidavit submitted on Monday (Oct 26). The petitions challenges the ECI’s decision-making process and seek to invalidate the SIR exercise and related actions. Singh’s plea also sought the suspension of the CEC over allegations of unilateral decision-making. &nbsp;A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant granted petitioner Rakesh Kumar Singh 10 days to file a rejoinder to the EC’s counter-affidavit. The matter is likely to be listed on November 17, after the Diwali vacation and completion of the 10-day period.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/exempt-from-rti-says-eci-on-query-seeking-sir-software-name-version-1792901830758">‘Exempt from RTI’, Says ECI on query seeking SIR software name, version</a>&nbsp;A day ago, the Election Commission (ECI) submitted counter-affidavit in the SC. In the counter affidavit, the ECI defended its functioning and the conduct of the SIR exercise, rejecting allegations of irregularities and questioning the basis of the petition. It said that the affidavit was unanimously approved by Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The ECI said all three SIR orders issued in June 2025, October 2025 and May 2026 were unanimous decisions of the Commission.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ram-ne-sharma-ko-maara-ec-orders-scrutiny-of-up-voter-list-after-bizarre-entries-1792989775345">'Ram ne Sharma ko maara': EC orders scrutiny of UP voter list after bizarre entries</a>&nbsp;On allegations concerning changes to voter enrolment forms, the ECI said Form 6 had not been amended and that only the Centre could make such changes. However, it acknowledged that the online display could be interpreted as an amendment and said that, from October 21, the online application would be split into Form 6 and a separate SIR declaration, in line with the physical form. The Commission also said voters whose records could not be mapped during the SIR need not attend hearings as a rule, with booth-level officers (BLOs) collecting documents from their homes.

The Supreme Court has deferred pleas against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar by 10 days, allowing petitioners, including Rahul Gandhi, to respond to the Election Commission’s affidavit defending its decisions and the Special Intensive Revision exercise. 

The Supreme Court has deferred the hearing of the pleas against CEC Gyanesh Kumar by 10 days. The time has been given to petitioners, including Rahul Gandhi, to file responses to the ECI affidavit submitted on Monday (Oct 26). The petitions challenges the ECI’s decision-making process and seek to invalidate the SIR exercise and related actions. Singh’s plea also sought the suspension of the CEC over allegations of unilateral decision-making. A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant granted petitioner Rakesh Kumar Singh 10 days to file a rejoinder to the EC’s counter-affidavit. The matter is likely to be listed on November 17, after the Diwali vacation and completion of the 10-day period. Also Read: ‘Exempt from RTI’, Says ECI on query seeking SIR software name, version A day ago, the Election Commission (ECI) submitted counter-affidavit in the SC. In the counter affidavit, the ECI defended its functioning and the conduct of the SIR exercise, rejecting allegations of irregularities and questioning the basis of the petition. It said that the affidavit was unanimously approved by Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The ECI said all three SIR orders issued in June 2025, October 2025 and May 2026 were unanimous decisions of the Commission. Also Read: 'Ram ne Sharma ko maara': EC orders scrutiny of UP voter list after bizarre entries On allegations concerning changes to voter enrolment forms, the ECI said Form 6 had not been amended and that only the Centre could make such changes. However, it acknowledged that the online display could be interpreted as an amendment and said that, from October 21, the online application would be split into Form 6 and a separate SIR declaration, in line with the physical form. The Commission also said voters whose records could not be mapped during the SIR need not attend hearings as a rule, with booth-level officers (BLOs) collecting documents from their homes.

The Supreme Court has deferred pleas against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar by 10 days, allowing petitioners, including Rahul Gandhi, to respond to the Election Commission’s affidavit defending its decisions and the Special Intensive Revision exercise.&nbsp;

SC defers pleas against CEC Gyanesh Kumar by 10 days, petitioners get time to respond to ECI

A Right To Information (RTI) has revealed that two Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had written to Cabinet Secretary TV Somanathan on July 9, 2024 about the alleged misconduct of senior deputy election commissioner (DEC) Maneesh Garg and sought action. The secretariat acknowledged both the complaints and sent a copy to Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar for his “information”.&nbsp;However, the Cabinet Secretary noted that the letters by the election commissioners were written in their individual capacities and though the complaint needed to be taken seriously, it could not be taken as a formal communication from the Election Commission of India as a whole.&nbsp;The Cabinet Secretary further noted that since the complaints were written in their individual capacities, any action taken in this regard would amount to "interference".&nbsp;The two Commissioners in their letters had alleged that revising the allocation of work among senior officers by Senior Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg, an IAS officer posted to the poll body by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) in September 2024, was without prior discussion with the Commission or the officers concerned.&nbsp;<h2>What was the complaint?</h2>&nbsp;In his letter to the Cabinet Secretary seeking action against Garg, Sandhu wrote, "This has happened in spite of repeated and explicit oral and written instructions to all concerned officers by the undersigned against taking such actions without prior discussion/approval of the Commission."&nbsp;He alleged violation of Sections 18(1) and 18(2) of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, and sought "appropriate action".&nbsp;Joshi too made a similar complaint but also alleged that he was denied the access to the relevant file when he sought it from the Administration Division.&nbsp;The RTI response on the complaint raised by Sandhu and Joshi read, "Both the ECs have stated that Shri Garg, after assuming the charge as link officer of DEC (Admn), has issued an order regarding work allocation of equivalent and senior officers to him without discussing the revised work allocation with the Commission or the officers concerned. Further, the aforementioned ECs have stated that this has happened despite repeated oral and written instructions to all concerned officers against taking such actions without prior discussion/approval of the Commission,"&nbsp;

The Cabinet Secretary noted that since the complaints were written in their individual capacities, any action taken in this regard would have amounted to "interference".

A Right To Information (RTI) has revealed that two Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had written to Cabinet Secretary TV Somanathan on July 9, 2024 about the alleged misconduct of senior deputy election commissioner (DEC) Maneesh Garg and sought action. The secretariat acknowledged both the complaints and sent a copy to Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar for his “information”. However, the Cabinet Secretary noted that the letters by the election commissioners were written in their individual capacities and though the complaint needed to be taken seriously, it could not be taken as a formal communication from the Election Commission of India as a whole. The Cabinet Secretary further noted that since the complaints were written in their individual capacities, any action taken in this regard would amount to "interference". The two Commissioners in their letters had alleged that revising the allocation of work among senior officers by Senior Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg, an IAS officer posted to the poll body by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) in September 2024, was without prior discussion with the Commission or the officers concerned. What was the complaint? In his letter to the Cabinet Secretary seeking action against Garg, Sandhu wrote, "This has happened in spite of repeated and explicit oral and written instructions to all concerned officers by the undersigned against taking such actions without prior discussion/approval of the Commission." He alleged violation of Sections 18(1) and 18(2) of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, and sought "appropriate action". Joshi too made a similar complaint but also alleged that he was denied the access to the relevant file when he sought it from the Administration Division. The RTI response on the complaint raised by Sandhu and Joshi read, "Both the ECs have stated that Shri Garg, after assuming the charge as link officer of DEC (Admn), has issued an order regarding work allocation of equivalent and senior officers to him without discussing the revised work allocation with the Commission or the officers concerned. Further, the aforementioned ECs have stated that this has happened despite repeated oral and written instructions to all concerned officers against taking such actions without prior discussion/approval of the Commission,"

The Cabinet Secretary noted that since the complaints were written in their individual capacities, any action taken in this regard would have amounted to "interference".

Election Commissioners raised complaint against senior panel officer, cabinet declined action, reveals RTI

Mumbai: The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) is holding a Tricolour protest at Mumbai’s Azad Maidan on Friday, bringing its continuing agitation to a designated protest site after a series of demonstrations across the city in recent weeks.Titled ‘Lehra Do Tiranga’, the rally is intended to express solidarity with CJP leaders Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das, who were sent to judicial custody following their arrest in connection with a protest at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar. The party has called on supporters to gather with the national flag.The demonstration has been scheduled between 10 am and 5 pm. Mumbai Police granted permission for the gathering at Azad Maidan, where public meetings and protests are permitted under specified conditions.The rally comes amid escalating tensions between the party and the authorities over the right to protest, following a series of confrontations in Mumbai and Delhi.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/supreme-court-seeks-centre-delhi-police-response-on-jantar-mantar-s-de-notification-as-protest-site-after-oct-10-anti-gyanesh-kumar-demonstration-1792050142201">Supreme Court seeks Centre, Delhi Police response on Jantar Mantar's de-notification as protest site</a><h2>Another protest in a series of demonstrations across Mumbai</h2>Friday’s gathering is the latest in a series of CJP-linked protests in Mumbai over the past two weeks.On October 2, CJP supporters assembled at Shivaji Park despite police denying permission for the proposed demonstration against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The agitation was linked to concerns over the Election Commission and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.On October 10, another gathering was planned at August Kranti Maidan in support of the party’s agitation in Delhi. Police detained around 600 people, including Mahatma Gandhi’s great-grandson Tushar Gandhi, actor Imran Khan and Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Varun Sardesai, as authorities prevented the gathering from proceeding as planned.On October 12, a protest involving the CJP, Shiv Sena (UBT) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) took place at Shivaji Park, initially conceived as a silent demonstration against the Chief Election Commissioner before turning vocal.The repeated demonstrations have kept Mumbai at the centre of the wider agitation, with protest organisers seeking to draw attention to their demands while police have cited permission requirements and public-order considerations in dealing with the gatherings.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-eci-on-voter-roll-revision-sir-row-on-rahul-gandhi-s-plea-hears-october-10-delhi-protest-pleas-1792049056350">Supreme Court issues notice to ECI, CEC Gyanesh Kumar on Rahul Gandhi, INDIA bloc plea; seeks answers on voter roll revision, SIR row</a><h2>Why is CJP protesting?</h2>The party’s agitation has centred on demands for Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and concerns about electoral processes, including the SIR exercise.The latest rally, however, is specifically focused on expressing solidarity with Ranka and Das after their arrest in Delhi.According to the party’s account, its leaders and supporters have sought to raise their concerns through demonstrations and the display of the national flag. The arrests have since become a separate focus of the agitation, with the CJP calling for supporters to mobilise in Mumbai and other cities.

CJP’s ‘Lehra Do Tiranga’ campaign has reached Mumbai after two of its leaders were sent to judicial custody in Delhi. With police permission granted for an Azad Maidan protest, the party is taking its ongoing agitation to a designated protest site.

Mumbai: The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) is holding a Tricolour protest at Mumbai’s Azad Maidan on Friday, bringing its continuing agitation to a designated protest site after a series of demonstrations across the city in recent weeks. Titled ‘Lehra Do Tiranga’, the rally is intended to express solidarity with CJP leaders Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das, who were sent to judicial custody following their arrest in connection with a protest at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar. The party has called on supporters to gather with the national flag. The demonstration has been scheduled between 10 am and 5 pm. Mumbai Police granted permission for the gathering at Azad Maidan, where public meetings and protests are permitted under specified conditions. The rally comes amid escalating tensions between the party and the authorities over the right to protest, following a series of confrontations in Mumbai and Delhi. Also read | Supreme Court seeks Centre, Delhi Police response on Jantar Mantar's de-notification as protest site Another protest in a series of demonstrations across Mumbai Friday’s gathering is the latest in a series of CJP-linked protests in Mumbai over the past two weeks. On October 2, CJP supporters assembled at Shivaji Park despite police denying permission for the proposed demonstration against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The agitation was linked to concerns over the Election Commission and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. On October 10, another gathering was planned at August Kranti Maidan in support of the party’s agitation in Delhi. Police detained around 600 people, including Mahatma Gandhi’s great-grandson Tushar Gandhi, actor Imran Khan and Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Varun Sardesai, as authorities prevented the gathering from proceeding as planned. On October 12, a protest involving the CJP, Shiv Sena (UBT) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) took place at Shivaji Park, initially conceived as a silent demonstration against the Chief Election Commissioner before turning vocal. The repeated demonstrations have kept Mumbai at the centre of the wider agitation, with protest organisers seeking to draw attention to their demands while police have cited permission requirements and public-order considerations in dealing with the gatherings. Also read | Supreme Court issues notice to ECI, CEC Gyanesh Kumar on Rahul Gandhi, INDIA bloc plea; seeks answers on voter roll revision, SIR row Why is CJP protesting? The party’s agitation has centred on demands for Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and concerns about electoral processes, including the SIR exercise. The latest rally, however, is specifically focused on expressing solidarity with Ranka and Das after their arrest in Delhi. According to the party’s account, its leaders and supporters have sought to raise their concerns through demonstrations and the display of the national flag. The arrests have since become a separate focus of the agitation, with the CJP calling for supporters to mobilise in Mumbai and other cities.

CJP’s ‘Lehra Do Tiranga’ campaign has reached Mumbai after two of its leaders were sent to judicial custody in Delhi. With police permission granted for an Azad Maidan protest, the party is taking its ongoing agitation to a designated protest site.

Mumbai: CJP brings Tricolour protest to Azad Maidan after weeks of demonstrations

The Supreme Court on Thursday (Oct 15) issued notice to the Election Commission of India (ECI) and senior poll officials on a plea led by Rahul Gandhi challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and alleged voter deletions. This comes as the top court commenced hearing petitions related to the October 10 protests in Delhi, including allegations of unlawful detention and harassment of peaceful demonstrators, lawyers and journalists.<h2>Top court issues notice to Gyanesh Kumar and other election commissioners</h2>A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notice to the Election Commission of India, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The notice follows a petition filed by Opposition leaders led by Rahul Gandhi and the INDIA bloc challenging the poll panel's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and alleging voter deletions.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/near-the-seat-of-power-far-from-free-protest-jantar-mantar-to-tiananmen-5-iconic-protest-sites-where-protests-are-no-longer-allowed-1791879318970">Near the seat of power, far from free protest? Jantar Mantar to Tiananmen: 5 iconic protest sites where protests are no longer allowed</a>"We are issuing notice and tagging it with the matters already pending. Somebody will accept notice on behalf of the Election Commission of India. Otherwise, serve them," the Court ordered.<h2>Supreme Court seeks responses in Delhi protest cases</h2>A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant commenced hearing a batch of petitions connected to the October 10 protests in the national capital. The pleas include challenges to alleged detentions and harassment of peaceful protesters, including lawyers and journalists.The Centre and other authorities have submitted responses to petitions on which the court had previously sought explanations. The bench had earlier identified four sets of matters directly or indirectly connected with the protests.The court had also sought the personal presence of a senior Delhi Police officer to explain allegations that women journalists were harassed and manhandled during the demonstrations. The bench had said it was aware of the allegations and had asked police officers present in court to look into the matter.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/supreme-court-seeks-centre-delhi-police-response-on-jantar-mantar-s-de-notification-as-protest-site-after-oct-10-anti-gyanesh-kumar-demonstration-1792050142201">Supreme Court seeks Centre, Delhi Police response on Jantar Mantar's de-notification as protest site</a>

The Supreme Court is hearing pleas over alleged police excesses during Delhi's October 10 protests and has sought responses from the Election Commission on Rahul Gandhi-led challenges to electoral roll revision and alleged voter deletions.

The Supreme Court on Thursday (Oct 15) issued notice to the Election Commission of India (ECI) and senior poll officials on a plea led by Rahul Gandhi challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and alleged voter deletions. This comes as the top court commenced hearing petitions related to the October 10 protests in Delhi, including allegations of unlawful detention and harassment of peaceful demonstrators, lawyers and journalists. Top court issues notice to Gyanesh Kumar and other election commissioners A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notice to the Election Commission of India, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The notice follows a petition filed by Opposition leaders led by Rahul Gandhi and the INDIA bloc challenging the poll panel's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and alleging voter deletions. Also read | Near the seat of power, far from free protest? Jantar Mantar to Tiananmen: 5 iconic protest sites where protests are no longer allowed "We are issuing notice and tagging it with the matters already pending. Somebody will accept notice on behalf of the Election Commission of India. Otherwise, serve them," the Court ordered. Supreme Court seeks responses in Delhi protest cases A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant commenced hearing a batch of petitions connected to the October 10 protests in the national capital. The pleas include challenges to alleged detentions and harassment of peaceful protesters, including lawyers and journalists. The Centre and other authorities have submitted responses to petitions on which the court had previously sought explanations. The bench had earlier identified four sets of matters directly or indirectly connected with the protests. The court had also sought the personal presence of a senior Delhi Police officer to explain allegations that women journalists were harassed and manhandled during the demonstrations. The bench had said it was aware of the allegations and had asked police officers present in court to look into the matter. Also read | Supreme Court seeks Centre, Delhi Police response on Jantar Mantar's de-notification as protest site

The Supreme Court is hearing pleas over alleged police excesses during Delhi's October 10 protests and has sought responses from the Election Commission on Rahul Gandhi-led challenges to electoral roll revision and alleged voter deletions.

Supreme Court issues notice to ECI, CEC Gyanesh Kumar on Rahul Gandhi, INDIA bloc plea; seeks answers on voter roll revision, SIR row

A petition filed by Lok Sabha Leader of the Opposition, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and 10 other INDIA bloc leaders challenging alleged electoral irregularities and the functioning of the Election Commission of India (ECI) will not be heard by the Supreme Court on Tuesday (Oct 13) after the registry flagged 14 defects in the filing. The defects include a ₹220 shortfall in court fees, an illegible photocopy of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's identity card and missing vakalatnamas for nine petitioners. The petitioners' legal team has requested that the matter be listed on Wednesday (Oct 14) after the objections are addressed.&nbsp;The delay comes as the Opposition leaders seek an independent, time-bound inquiry into decisions allegedly taken unilaterally by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. They have also sought a stay on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls until the inquiry is completed. The plea was expected to be considered alongside other pending petitions linked to protests in Delhi demanding Kumar’s resignation.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/modi-is-a-dictator-abhijeet-dipke-claims-govt-scared-of-youth-slams-stringent-measures-ahead-of-cjp-jantar-mantar-protest-1791601819295">'Modi is a dictator': Abhijeet Dipke claims govt 'scared' of youth, slams stringent measures</a><h2>Missing vakalatnamas</h2>Nine of the 11 petitioners are yet to submit their vakalatnamas, the documents authorising lawyers to represent them in court. Those named among the petitioners whose documents are missing include Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav, NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) MP Supriya Sule, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut and Trinamool Congress MP Saugata Roy.The registry has also questioned the inclusion of “private parties” as respondents in a writ petition framed as a public interest litigation. The objection relates to the decision to name all three election commissioners as respondents, alongside the ECI.The petition names Kumar, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.&nbsp;<h2>Plea follows Opposition march and CJI meeting request</h2>The filing came a day after Chief Justice of India Surya Kant declined a meeting with Gandhi and Kharge, the Leaders of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, respectively. He indicated that their concerns could be raised through judicial proceedings and assured an expeditious hearing if they approached the court.Gandhi personally appeared at the Supreme Court on Monday evening to file the petition, accompanied by Kharge and nine other Opposition leaders. Their joint move signalled a coordinated challenge to the electoral roll revision exercise and what they alleged was unilateral decision-making within the poll panel.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/right-to-protest-must-be-protected-but-delhi-police-reveals-why-it-denied-cjp-permission-for-october-10-jantar-mantar-protest-1791597649145">‘Right to protest must be protected, but...’: Delhi Police reveals why it denied CJP permission for October 10 Jantar Mantar protest</a><h2>What the Opposition wants the court to examine</h2>Filed through advocate S Prasanna, the petition seeks an independent investigation into decisions allegedly taken unilaterally by Kumar, including the June 2025 decision to conduct the SIR.The petitioners said they had approached the Supreme Court to “protect the constitutional guarantee of universal adult suffrage” and ensure that elections remain free, fair, transparent and accountable. They clarified that they were not asking the court to reconsider the validity of the SIR itself. Instead, they want it to examine whether established safeguards were followed and whether the ECI acted collectively while taking decisions on the exercise.<h2>Petition seeks records of alleged disagreements within ECI</h2>The plea cites an Indian Express report that election commissioners Sandhu and Joshi had objected to unilateral decision-making by Kumar on 14 occasions over a period of 10 months. On that basis, the petition asks the Supreme Court to call for complete records of the disputed decisions, including files, agendas, minutes, internal notings and objections recorded by the two commissioners. These records, the petition says, should include material relating to the June 2025 decision to conduct the SIR.“The reported exercise of collective powers by a single member, if established, would raise a substantial question concerning compliance with Article 324 of the Constitution and Section 18 of the 2023 Act,” the petition states. It argues that the issue goes beyond internal administrative procedure and concerns the lawful exercise of constitutional authority by the body responsible for safeguarding the integrity of elections.

Rahul Gandhi and 10 other INDIA bloc leaders' plea against alleged unilateral decisions by the Election Commission will not be heard on Tuesday after the Supreme Court registry flagged 14 filing defects, including missing vakalatnamas and a court-fee shortfall.


A petition filed by Lok Sabha Leader of the Opposition, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and 10 other INDIA bloc leaders challenging alleged electoral irregularities and the functioning of the Election Commission of India (ECI) will not be heard by the Supreme Court on Tuesday (Oct 13) after the registry flagged 14 defects in the filing. The defects include a ₹220 shortfall in court fees, an illegible photocopy of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's identity card and missing vakalatnamas for nine petitioners. The petitioners' legal team has requested that the matter be listed on Wednesday (Oct 14) after the objections are addressed. The delay comes as the Opposition leaders seek an independent, time-bound inquiry into decisions allegedly taken unilaterally by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. They have also sought a stay on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls until the inquiry is completed. The plea was expected to be considered alongside other pending petitions linked to protests in Delhi demanding Kumar’s resignation. Also read | 'Modi is a dictator': Abhijeet Dipke claims govt 'scared' of youth, slams stringent measures Missing vakalatnamas Nine of the 11 petitioners are yet to submit their vakalatnamas, the documents authorising lawyers to represent them in court. Those named among the petitioners whose documents are missing include Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav, NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) MP Supriya Sule, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut and Trinamool Congress MP Saugata Roy. The registry has also questioned the inclusion of “private parties” as respondents in a writ petition framed as a public interest litigation. The objection relates to the decision to name all three election commissioners as respondents, alongside the ECI. The petition names Kumar, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. Plea follows Opposition march and CJI meeting request The filing came a day after Chief Justice of India Surya Kant declined a meeting with Gandhi and Kharge, the Leaders of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, respectively. He indicated that their concerns could be raised through judicial proceedings and assured an expeditious hearing if they approached the court. Gandhi personally appeared at the Supreme Court on Monday evening to file the petition, accompanied by Kharge and nine other Opposition leaders. Their joint move signalled a coordinated challenge to the electoral roll revision exercise and what they alleged was unilateral decision-making within the poll panel. Also read | ‘Right to protest must be protected, but...’: Delhi Police reveals why it denied CJP permission for October 10 Jantar Mantar protest What the Opposition wants the court to examine Filed through advocate S Prasanna, the petition seeks an independent investigation into decisions allegedly taken unilaterally by Kumar, including the June 2025 decision to conduct the SIR. The petitioners said they had approached the Supreme Court to “protect the constitutional guarantee of universal adult suffrage” and ensure that elections remain free, fair, transparent and accountable. They clarified that they were not asking the court to reconsider the validity of the SIR itself. Instead, they want it to examine whether established safeguards were followed and whether the ECI acted collectively while taking decisions on the exercise. Petition seeks records of alleged disagreements within ECI The plea cites an Indian Express report that election commissioners Sandhu and Joshi had objected to unilateral decision-making by Kumar on 14 occasions over a period of 10 months. On that basis, the petition asks the Supreme Court to call for complete records of the disputed decisions, including files, agendas, minutes, internal notings and objections recorded by the two commissioners. These records, the petition says, should include material relating to the June 2025 decision to conduct the SIR. “The reported exercise of collective powers by a single member, if established, would raise a substantial question concerning compliance with Article 324 of the Constitution and Section 18 of the 2023 Act,” the petition states. It argues that the issue goes beyond internal administrative procedure and concerns the lawful exercise of constitutional authority by the body responsible for safeguarding the integrity of elections.

Rahul Gandhi and 10 other INDIA bloc leaders' plea against alleged unilateral decisions by the Election Commission will not be heard on Tuesday after the Supreme Court registry flagged 14 filing defects, including missing vakalatnamas and a court-fee shortfall.

Rahul Gandhi's plea against Election Commission delayed as Supreme Court registry flags 14 ‘defects’

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi made a series of sensational claims at a press conference in New Delhi, where he demanded the resignation of CEC Gyanesh Kumar. From claiming that 200 govt officials were in touch with the Opposition to a signal at Cockroach Janta Party-led protesters, the Congress MP sharpened his attack on the Centre.

High-voltage political drama in New Delhi as opposition leaders march to apex court

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi made a series of sensational claims at a press conference in New Delhi, where he demanded the resignation of CEC Gyanesh Kumar. From claiming that 200 govt officials were in touch with the Opposition to a signal at Cockroach Janta Party-led protesters, the Congress MP sharpened his attack on the Centre.


Delhi protests: LoP Rahul Gandhi demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation

A day after Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Surya Kant declined the request of INDIA bloc leaders for a meeting to submit a representation over alleged electoral irregularities, CJI Kant on Monday (Oct 12) said the Supreme Court should not be dragged into political activity.&nbsp;While hearing petitions regarding the detention of lawyers during the protests called by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) against Gyanesh Kumar, CJI Kant agreed to take them up on Tuesday and &nbsp;said, “All these democratic activities should take place, but at least in Supreme Court functioning…”.&nbsp;“The Court should not be dragged into any kind of political activity. There should not be any incitement or obstruction in the functioning of the court, the movement of lawyers, court staff or litigants. They should be allowed to work," he added.&nbsp;<h2>Rahul Gandhi to move Supreme Court</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi said on Monday that the INDIA bloc leaders would jointly file a petition in the Supreme Court against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. He said protesters were forcibly detained on the first day of their protest and sought a dedicated protest site on the second day. Rahul said the bloc was now approaching the Supreme Court after the Chief Justice of India responded and advised them to pursue the legal course. He also questioned why Gyanesh Kumar was not resigning and alleged corruption against the CEC.&nbsp;Congress described Monday’s protest as “Chalo Delhi—March for Democracy” and asked participants to gather at the Connaught Place–Barakhamba Road junction at 1.30 pm.&nbsp;In a video post on X, Gandhi said youths, opposition parties, and civil society groups would join the march.&nbsp;A bench led by CJI Surya Kant had, in May 2026, upheld the validity of the power of the Election Commission of India to conduct the SIR. The CJI's bench is also seized of petitions challenging the various decisions of the CEC, which are alleged to have been taken without the concurrence of the other Election Commissioners.

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi said on Monday that the INDIA bloc leaders would jointly file a petition in the Supreme Court against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

A day after Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Surya Kant declined the request of INDIA bloc leaders for a meeting to submit a representation over alleged electoral irregularities, CJI Kant on Monday (Oct 12) said the Supreme Court should not be dragged into political activity. While hearing petitions regarding the detention of lawyers during the protests called by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) against Gyanesh Kumar, CJI Kant agreed to take them up on Tuesday and said, “All these democratic activities should take place, but at least in Supreme Court functioning…”. “The Court should not be dragged into any kind of political activity. There should not be any incitement or obstruction in the functioning of the court, the movement of lawyers, court staff or litigants. They should be allowed to work," he added. Rahul Gandhi to move Supreme Court Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi said on Monday that the INDIA bloc leaders would jointly file a petition in the Supreme Court against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. He said protesters were forcibly detained on the first day of their protest and sought a dedicated protest site on the second day. Rahul said the bloc was now approaching the Supreme Court after the Chief Justice of India responded and advised them to pursue the legal course. He also questioned why Gyanesh Kumar was not resigning and alleged corruption against the CEC. Congress described Monday’s protest as “Chalo Delhi—March for Democracy” and asked participants to gather at the Connaught Place–Barakhamba Road junction at 1.30 pm. In a video post on X, Gandhi said youths, opposition parties, and civil society groups would join the march. A bench led by CJI Surya Kant had, in May 2026, upheld the validity of the power of the Election Commission of India to conduct the SIR. The CJI's bench is also seized of petitions challenging the various decisions of the CEC, which are alleged to have been taken without the concurrence of the other Election Commissioners.

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi said on Monday that the INDIA bloc leaders would jointly file a petition in the Supreme Court against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Delhi protests: 'Court should not be dragged into political activity', says CJI Surya Kant

Opposition leaders are set to assemble at India Gate on Monday (October 12) and move to the Supreme Court to meet Chief Justice of India Surya Kant after 4 pm. They have also urged people to join their next round of protests. The move comes after security forces clamped down on thousands of protesters to stop a Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led movement seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav is also set to join the INDIA bloc’s march tomorrow. Congress general secretary K C Venugopal said, “We appeal to every Indian concerned about the survival of Indian democracy to join us in a massive protest march in Delhi on Monday - against the nationwide Vote Chori orchestrated by the Modi-Shah regime.” He added, “INDIA MPs, leaders, workers and all concerned citizens will be holding a huge protest march against Gyanesh &amp; Co, and a delegation of our senior leaders will submit a memorandum to the Hon’ble CJI for his intervention in this crisis.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/cjp-leaders-claim-their-phones-may-be-hacked-or-cloned-after-24-hour-detention-1791726709135">CJP leaders claim their phones may be ‘hacked or cloned’ after 24-hour detention</a><h3>Rahul Gandhi announces march towards SC</h3>In a post on social media platform X, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi announced that the Opposition leaders would march to the Supreme Court and submit a memorandum to the CJI, demanding an end to “vote chori”, a halt to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. “We will march to the Supreme Court as Indians, united beyond party, gender, caste, community and state. Youth, all opposition parties, civil society groups, all those who believe in democracy and stand by the Constitution of India, will walk with us,” he said on X. “Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, Ajit Doval and Mohan Bhagwat cannot silence India's voice. These cowards cannot intimidate us. They will have to step aside. We will march together, with love, brotherhood and patriotism," he also said. “Daro mat. Tomorrow, all of India will march to the Supreme Court,” he added.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Yesterday, the nation's young came out in Delhi to peacefully protest. They came with love in their hearts, not hatred or anger. They were beaten, both by cops and BJP goons. 

This is not the India we want.

Tomorrow, we will march to the Supreme Court as Indians, united beyond party, gender, caste, community and state. 

Youth, all opposition parties, civil society groups, all those who believe in democracy and stand by the Constitution of India, will walk with us.

We will submit a memorandum to the Chief Justice on behalf of the nation, demanding an end to vote chori, halting of SIR and the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar.

Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, Ajit Doval and Mohan Bhagwat cannot silence India's voice. These cowards cannot intimidate us. They will have to step aside.

We will march together, with love, brotherhood and patriotism.

Daro mat. 

Tomorrow, all of India will march to the Supreme Court. 

कल दिल्ली में देश का युवा शांतिपूर्ण विरोध के लिए सड़कों पर उतरा। उनके दिलों में नफ़रत या गुस्सा नहीं, मोहब्बत थी। लेकिन उन्हें पुलिस और BJP के गुंडों, दोनों ने पीटा।

ऐसा भारत हम नहीं चाहते।

कल, सोमवार 12 अक्टूबर को, हम भारतीय होने के नाते सुप्रीम कोर्ट तक मार्च करेंगे। पार्टी, महिला-पुरुष, जाति, समुदाय और राज्य की हर दीवार से ऊपर उठकर, हम सब एक साथ चलेंगे।

देश का युवा, तमाम विपक्षी दल, सिविल सोसाइटी और लोकतंत्र में विश्वास रखने वाले, भारत के संविधान के साथ खड़े सभी लोग हमारे साथ चलेंगे।

हम देश की ओर से मुख्य न्यायाधीश को एक ज्ञापन सौंपेंगे। हमारी माँग है - वोट चोरी बंद हो, SIR पर रोक लगे और ज्ञानेश कुमार इस्तीफ़ा दें।

नरेंद्र मोदी, अमित शाह, अजित डोभाल और मोहन भागवत भारत की आवाज़ को दबा नहीं सकते। ये कायर हमें डरा नहीं सकते। इन्हें पीछे हटना ही होगा।
हम सब साथ चलेंगे - मोहब्बत, भाईचारे और देशभक्ति के साथ।

डरो मत।

कल पूरा भारत सुप्रीम कोर्ट तक मार्च करेगा।

#ChaloDilli&mdash; Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) <a href="https://x.com/RahulGandhi/status/2109271519373545893?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Gandhi also condemned the treatment of protesters at Jantar Mantar on Saturday, alleging that they were beaten despite having gathered for a peaceful demonstration. He wrote, “Yesterday, the nation’s young came out in Delhi to peacefully protest. They came with love in their hearts, not hatred or anger. They were beaten, both by cops and BJP goons. This is not the India we want.”

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi announced that the Opposition leaders would march to the Supreme Court and submit a memorandum to the CJI, demanding an end to “vote chori”, a halt to SIR of electoral rolls, and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Opposition leaders are set to assemble at India Gate on Monday (October 12) and move to the Supreme Court to meet Chief Justice of India Surya Kant after 4 pm. They have also urged people to join their next round of protests. The move comes after security forces clamped down on thousands of protesters to stop a Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led movement seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav is also set to join the INDIA bloc’s march tomorrow. Congress general secretary K C Venugopal said, “We appeal to every Indian concerned about the survival of Indian democracy to join us in a massive protest march in Delhi on Monday - against the nationwide Vote Chori orchestrated by the Modi-Shah regime.” He added, “INDIA MPs, leaders, workers and all concerned citizens will be holding a huge protest march against Gyanesh & Co, and a delegation of our senior leaders will submit a memorandum to the Hon’ble CJI for his intervention in this crisis.” Also read: CJP leaders claim their phones may be ‘hacked or cloned’ after 24-hour detention Rahul Gandhi announces march towards SC In a post on social media platform X, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi announced that the Opposition leaders would march to the Supreme Court and submit a memorandum to the CJI, demanding an end to “vote chori”, a halt to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. “We will march to the Supreme Court as Indians, united beyond party, gender, caste, community and state. Youth, all opposition parties, civil society groups, all those who believe in democracy and stand by the Constitution of India, will walk with us,” he said on X. “Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, Ajit Doval and Mohan Bhagwat cannot silence India's voice. These cowards cannot intimidate us. They will have to step aside. We will march together, with love, brotherhood and patriotism," he also said. “Daro mat. Tomorrow, all of India will march to the Supreme Court,” he added.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi announced that the Opposition leaders would march to the Supreme Court and submit a memorandum to the CJI, demanding an end to “vote chori”, a halt to SIR of electoral rolls, and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

After crackdown on CJP, opposition to march to Supreme Court Monday over ‘vote chori', removal of CEC

Delhi has stepped up security ahead of a proposed protest at Jantar Mantar on Saturday, October 10, with restrictions and service disruptions expected to affect commuters, businesses and residents across parts of the national capital.The security measures include a temporary mobile internet suspension in a designated area, restricted access to several Delhi Metro stations, train cancellations, traffic diversions and precautionary advisories for commercial establishments. The demonstration, organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and student groups, is seeking the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The INDIA bloc has also separately protested against the Election Commission of India (ECI), alleging that it has failed to ensure free and fair elections.<h2>Delhi Police denies permission for protest</h2>Delhi Police has denied permission for Saturday's proposed demonstration, citing the late submission of the application and alleged violations during an earlier protest. Authorities have imposed prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), deployed additional personnel and restricted access to several sensitive locations. Security arrangements include barricades around Jantar Mantar, Parliament Street and other important areas, with checks intended to prevent unauthorised gatherings and manage crowds near high-security establishments.<h3>Election Commission headquarters fortified</h3>Security has been strengthened around theElection Commission of India headquarters on Ashoka Road. A bus has been positioned near the Sansad Marg–Ashoka Road roundabout to block access along the road towards the ECI office. Barricades have also been erected outside the headquarters, with security personnel deployed in large numbers.Authorities are monitoring the surrounding areas as preparations continue for the proposed demonstration.<h2>Mobile internet suspended for 24 hours</h2>The Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has approved a 24-hour suspension of mobile internet services within a four-kilometre radius of the Janpath–Kartavya Path area in New Delhi. The suspension began at 10 pm on Friday and is scheduled to remain in force until 10 pm on Saturday. Officials cited public security concerns and invoked the Telecommunications (Temporary Suspension of Services) Rules, 2024. The order applies specifically to mobile internet services within the notified area.<h2>45 Delhi metro stations face entry and exit restrictions</h2>The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) revised its earlier plan to close 57 metro stations after the Supreme Court intervened on Friday. The court directed the Centre and Delhi Police to lift blanket restrictions on metro and railway services ahead of the proposed protest. It emphasised that security arrangements should not completely shut down public transport or cause widespread inconvenience to ordinary commuters.&nbsp;Under the revised advisory, entry and exit gates at 45 designated metro stations are scheduled to remain closed from 9 pm on October 9 until 6 pm on October 10. Security agencies will assess the situation before deciding whether further restrictions are necessary. The affected stations include Janpath, Patel Chowk, Central Secretariat, Lok Kalyan Marg, Rajiv Chowk, New Delhi, Seva Teerth, Mandi House and Barakhamba Road, among others. Interchange facilities will remain operational at the affected stations, except at New Delhi station. Passengers will not be able to enter or exit through the affected stations during the specified period. Commuters have been advised to check the latest DMRC announcements before travelling.<h2>Delhi Traffic police warns of diversions</h2>Delhi Traffic Police has warned of possible traffic disruptions across the capital on Saturday as security arrangements intensify around the planned CJP protest. Depending on the situation, diversions could begin at 6 am and affect Dhaula Kuan, Mandi House, Connaught Place, Jantar Mantar Road, Patel Chowk and Sansad Marg. People travelling to railway stations, bus terminals and the airport have been advised to allow additional travel time and avoid unnecessary journeys. Traffic restrictions may be revised depending on crowd movement and the prevailing security situation.<h2>254 trains cancelled on Saturday</h2>Railway services are also expected to be affected, with 254 trains reportedly cancelled between 4 am and 2 pm on Saturday. The cancellations include 75 Mail and Express trains and 179 local trains. Services connecting Delhi with Ghaziabad, Meerut, Panipat and Kurukshetra are among those affected. According to an earlier Hindustan Times report, the affected services include the Howrah–New Delhi Rajdhani Express, Tejas Rajdhani Express, Magadh Express, Sampoorna Kranti Express and Shaan-e-Bhopal Express. Security arrangements also include checks at Delhi's entry points and restrictions in sensitive areas. Passengers should verify their train's status with the relevant railway authorities before leaving for the station.<h3>Connaught place businesses advised to remain shut</h3>The New Delhi Traders Association (NDTA) has advised shops, offices, restaurants and other commercial establishments in Connaught Place to remain closed on Saturday as a precautionary measure. In a circular issued on Friday, NDTA president Atul Bhargava urged business owners and occupants to remain vigilant and cooperate with the advisory to reduce the risk of property damage and injuries during the anticipated demonstrations. Connaught Place and neighbouring areas could experience heightened security checks and movement restrictions. Jantar Mantar, a prominent protest venue in the capital, is also under increased security surveillance.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-protest-showdown-are-citizens-being-caught-in-the-political-crossfire-1791569066817">Delhi protest showdown: Are citizens being caught in the political crossfire? | The Verdict</a><h2>Liquor shops to remain closed on October 10</h2>Retail liquor outlets across Delhi are scheduled to remain closed on Saturday under a two-day dry-day order issued by the Delhi Excise Department amid the security arrangements. Residents and visitors should check local notifications for details about the closure and any related restrictions.<h2>Section 163 restrictions remain in force</h2>Delhi Police has imposed prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS in designated sensitive areas. The provision empowers authorities to issue urgent orders to address potential threats to public safety and maintain public order. Barricades have been installed and access to roads around Jantar Mantar and Parliament Street has been restricted. The measures are intended to prevent unauthorised gatherings and regulate crowd movement near important government establishments.<h2>Police register 27 FIRs over seven days of protests</h2>According to news agency ANI, law enforcement agencies have registered 27 First Information Reports (FIRs) over a seven-day period of protests targeting Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Police have invoked provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) relating to joint criminal liability, disobedience of public orders, obstruction of public servants and the use of force against officials. Section 3(5) of the BNS, which concerns joint criminal liability when multiple people act with a common intention, was invoked in 22 of the 27 FIRs. Section 223(a), concerning disobedience of an order issued by a public servant, appeared in 18 FIRs.&nbsp;Section 221, which deals with obstructing a public servant in the discharge of public functions, was cited in 17 FIRs. Section 132, covering assault or criminal force intended to deter a public servant from performing official duties, was also invoked in 17 FIRs. Police additionally invoked Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act in nine FIRs. Other provisions cited in individual cases included offences relating to causing hurt, wrongful restraint, wrongful confinement and assault.<h2>What Delhi residents should know</h2>With security arrangements affecting transport, communications and commercial activity, residents and visitors should check official advisories before travelling on Saturday. Key precautions include checking metro and train services in advance, allowing extra time for airport and railway journeys, avoiding restricted roads around Jantar Mantar and Parliament Street, and confirming whether local businesses and services are operating. The scale of the restrictions may change depending on the security assessment and developments surrounding the proposed protest.

Delhi protest today: Security tightened ahead of the Jantar Mantar demonstration, with 45 metro stations affected, 254 train cancellations and mobile internet restrictions

Delhi has stepped up security ahead of a proposed protest at Jantar Mantar on Saturday, October 10, with restrictions and service disruptions expected to affect commuters, businesses and residents across parts of the national capital. The security measures include a temporary mobile internet suspension in a designated area, restricted access to several Delhi Metro stations, train cancellations, traffic diversions and precautionary advisories for commercial establishments. The demonstration, organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and student groups, is seeking the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The INDIA bloc has also separately protested against the Election Commission of India (ECI), alleging that it has failed to ensure free and fair elections. Delhi Police denies permission for protest Delhi Police has denied permission for Saturday's proposed demonstration, citing the late submission of the application and alleged violations during an earlier protest. Authorities have imposed prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), deployed additional personnel and restricted access to several sensitive locations. Security arrangements include barricades around Jantar Mantar, Parliament Street and other important areas, with checks intended to prevent unauthorised gatherings and manage crowds near high-security establishments. Election Commission headquarters fortified Security has been strengthened around theElection Commission of India headquarters on Ashoka Road. A bus has been positioned near the Sansad Marg–Ashoka Road roundabout to block access along the road towards the ECI office. Barricades have also been erected outside the headquarters, with security personnel deployed in large numbers. Authorities are monitoring the surrounding areas as preparations continue for the proposed demonstration. Mobile internet suspended for 24 hours The Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has approved a 24-hour suspension of mobile internet services within a four-kilometre radius of the Janpath–Kartavya Path area in New Delhi. The suspension began at 10 pm on Friday and is scheduled to remain in force until 10 pm on Saturday. Officials cited public security concerns and invoked the Telecommunications (Temporary Suspension of Services) Rules, 2024. The order applies specifically to mobile internet services within the notified area. 45 Delhi metro stations face entry and exit restrictions The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) revised its earlier plan to close 57 metro stations after the Supreme Court intervened on Friday. The court directed the Centre and Delhi Police to lift blanket restrictions on metro and railway services ahead of the proposed protest. It emphasised that security arrangements should not completely shut down public transport or cause widespread inconvenience to ordinary commuters. Under the revised advisory, entry and exit gates at 45 designated metro stations are scheduled to remain closed from 9 pm on October 9 until 6 pm on October 10. Security agencies will assess the situation before deciding whether further restrictions are necessary. The affected stations include Janpath, Patel Chowk, Central Secretariat, Lok Kalyan Marg, Rajiv Chowk, New Delhi, Seva Teerth, Mandi House and Barakhamba Road, among others. Interchange facilities will remain operational at the affected stations, except at New Delhi station. Passengers will not be able to enter or exit through the affected stations during the specified period. Commuters have been advised to check the latest DMRC announcements before travelling. Delhi Traffic police warns of diversions Delhi Traffic Police has warned of possible traffic disruptions across the capital on Saturday as security arrangements intensify around the planned CJP protest. Depending on the situation, diversions could begin at 6 am and affect Dhaula Kuan, Mandi House, Connaught Place, Jantar Mantar Road, Patel Chowk and Sansad Marg. People travelling to railway stations, bus terminals and the airport have been advised to allow additional travel time and avoid unnecessary journeys. Traffic restrictions may be revised depending on crowd movement and the prevailing security situation. 254 trains cancelled on Saturday Railway services are also expected to be affected, with 254 trains reportedly cancelled between 4 am and 2 pm on Saturday. The cancellations include 75 Mail and Express trains and 179 local trains. Services connecting Delhi with Ghaziabad, Meerut, Panipat and Kurukshetra are among those affected. According to an earlier Hindustan Times report, the affected services include the Howrah–New Delhi Rajdhani Express, Tejas Rajdhani Express, Magadh Express, Sampoorna Kranti Express and Shaan-e-Bhopal Express. Security arrangements also include checks at Delhi's entry points and restrictions in sensitive areas. Passengers should verify their train's status with the relevant railway authorities before leaving for the station. Connaught place businesses advised to remain shut The New Delhi Traders Association (NDTA) has advised shops, offices, restaurants and other commercial establishments in Connaught Place to remain closed on Saturday as a precautionary measure. In a circular issued on Friday, NDTA president Atul Bhargava urged business owners and occupants to remain vigilant and cooperate with the advisory to reduce the risk of property damage and injuries during the anticipated demonstrations. Connaught Place and neighbouring areas could experience heightened security checks and movement restrictions. Jantar Mantar, a prominent protest venue in the capital, is also under increased security surveillance. Also Read: Delhi protest showdown: Are citizens being caught in the political crossfire? | The Verdict Liquor shops to remain closed on October 10 Retail liquor outlets across Delhi are scheduled to remain closed on Saturday under a two-day dry-day order issued by the Delhi Excise Department amid the security arrangements. Residents and visitors should check local notifications for details about the closure and any related restrictions. Section 163 restrictions remain in force Delhi Police has imposed prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS in designated sensitive areas. The provision empowers authorities to issue urgent orders to address potential threats to public safety and maintain public order. Barricades have been installed and access to roads around Jantar Mantar and Parliament Street has been restricted. The measures are intended to prevent unauthorised gatherings and regulate crowd movement near important government establishments. Police register 27 FIRs over seven days of protests According to news agency ANI, law enforcement agencies have registered 27 First Information Reports (FIRs) over a seven-day period of protests targeting Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Police have invoked provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) relating to joint criminal liability, disobedience of public orders, obstruction of public servants and the use of force against officials. Section 3(5) of the BNS, which concerns joint criminal liability when multiple people act with a common intention, was invoked in 22 of the 27 FIRs. Section 223(a), concerning disobedience of an order issued by a public servant, appeared in 18 FIRs. Section 221, which deals with obstructing a public servant in the discharge of public functions, was cited in 17 FIRs. Section 132, covering assault or criminal force intended to deter a public servant from performing official duties, was also invoked in 17 FIRs. Police additionally invoked Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act in nine FIRs. Other provisions cited in individual cases included offences relating to causing hurt, wrongful restraint, wrongful confinement and assault. What Delhi residents should know With security arrangements affecting transport, communications and commercial activity, residents and visitors should check official advisories before travelling on Saturday. Key precautions include checking metro and train services in advance, allowing extra time for airport and railway journeys, avoiding restricted roads around Jantar Mantar and Parliament Street, and confirming whether local businesses and services are operating. The scale of the restrictions may change depending on the security assessment and developments surrounding the proposed protest.

Delhi tightens security ahead of the Jantar Mantar protest, with metro restrictions, 254 train cancellations, traffic diversions and internet curbs

Delhi protest: Metro curbs, train cancellations, traffic diversions as protesters seek CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation

The Supreme Court on Monday (October 5) declined to approve an ex parte interim order to suspend Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over allegations related to his role in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. In response, the court said it must first hear the Election Commission and others.&nbsp;A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, issued notices to the Centre, Election Commission of India, CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg and DG (IT) Seema Khanna. “Let's first have authenticated information on that. We can always annul any decision…,” observed the bench. The petition cited a report alleging that 14 significant SIR-related decisions were under the authority of the ECI despite objections recorded by the two other Election Commissioners. Senior advocate Vikas Singh, representing one of the petitioners, Rakesh Kumar Singh, demanded immediate suspension of the CEC, arguing that these one-sided decisions posed a serious threat to the democratic electoral process. Citing Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, Singh argued that decisions made by the ECI must either be unanimous or, in the absence of consensus, determined by majority vote. When Singh pressed for the CEC's suspension, however, the bench raised concerns about whether such a move was practical, noting that it risked disrupting the poll panel's operations altogether. “Who will conduct the elections?” the bench asked. In response, Singh said that the other two Election Commissioners could discharge the responsibilities. The bench noted that it would have to first examine the allegations after receiving responses from the respondents. CJI Kant felt that the statutory framework was necessary and said, “If there is any violation, we will undo.” Justice Bagchi also questioned the possibility of granting such relief without hearing the ECI, noting that if the records ultimately showed that decisions were not unanimous, the court could proclaim them ultra vires. Further, the CJI directed that the court couldn't pass an order based on media reports only.

The petition cited a report alleging that 14 significant SIR-related decisions were under the authority of the ECI despite objections recorded by the two other Election Commissioners. 

The Supreme Court on Monday (October 5) declined to approve an ex parte interim order to suspend Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over allegations related to his role in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. In response, the court said it must first hear the Election Commission and others. A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, issued notices to the Centre, Election Commission of India, CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg and DG (IT) Seema Khanna. “Let's first have authenticated information on that. We can always annul any decision…,” observed the bench. The petition cited a report alleging that 14 significant SIR-related decisions were under the authority of the ECI despite objections recorded by the two other Election Commissioners. Senior advocate Vikas Singh, representing one of the petitioners, Rakesh Kumar Singh, demanded immediate suspension of the CEC, arguing that these one-sided decisions posed a serious threat to the democratic electoral process. Citing Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, Singh argued that decisions made by the ECI must either be unanimous or, in the absence of consensus, determined by majority vote. When Singh pressed for the CEC's suspension, however, the bench raised concerns about whether such a move was practical, noting that it risked disrupting the poll panel's operations altogether. “Who will conduct the elections?” the bench asked. In response, Singh said that the other two Election Commissioners could discharge the responsibilities. The bench noted that it would have to first examine the allegations after receiving responses from the respondents. CJI Kant felt that the statutory framework was necessary and said, “If there is any violation, we will undo.” Justice Bagchi also questioned the possibility of granting such relief without hearing the ECI, noting that if the records ultimately showed that decisions were not unanimous, the court could proclaim them ultra vires. Further, the CJI directed that the court couldn't pass an order based on media reports only.

The petition cited a report alleging that 14 significant SIR-related decisions were under the authority of the ECI despite objections recorded by the two other Election Commissioners.&nbsp;

Supreme Court refuses ex parte order against CEC, seeks response from Election Commission

The Kerala Home Department has directed the state to reopen a Vigilance investigation into alleged corruption in a road-related project from 2006. During that period, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar served as secretary of the state Public Works Department (PWD). The case has been reopened after Kerala's Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala directed a probe following the suicide of a Malaysian engineer, Lee See Been, who was then chief project manager of a major road work undertaken by PATI-BEL, an Indo-Malaysian venture, in the state. After the Malaysian engineer's death, Kumar’s name had reportedly surfaced in the suicide note. Lee See Been alleged that Gyanesh Kumar, while serving as the secretary of the state PWD, demanded a bribe for clearing payment for the work. The road project, named Kerala State Transport Project (KSTR), was funded by the World Bank. Chennithala confirmed on Sunday (October 4) that he had received a complaint that the Vigilance probe conducted in 2006 was compromised after external compulsion. “I have directed the Vigilance to probe into the matter thoroughly. Gyanesh Kumar’s name had figured in the suicide note of the Malaysian engineer. He had clearly mentioned Kumar’s name in his suicide note addressed to his wife as well as the company director.” He said, “Vigilance had examined the matter in 2006. However, the probe did not go ahead, although Kumar was transferred out of the PWD. Now, I have got a complaint from Congress leader Malayankeezhu Gopalakrishan regarding the issue. I had discussed the matter with Chief Minister V D Satheesan and decided to order a comprehensive probe in this regard."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/gurugram-techie-dies-by-suicide-in-noida-amid-debt-and-financial-distress-say-police-1791103708066">Gurugram techie dies by suicide in Noida amid debt and financial distress, say police</a><h3>Gyanesh Kumar transferred to Delhi under UPA-1 administration</h3>Chennithala further claimed that Gyanesh Kumar's transfer to Delhi on central deputation from the PWD was never returned to the state cadre. “The Vigilance will conduct a comprehensive probe and will take all legal steps. The probe held in 2006 was abandoned midway. Based on the fresh complaint, it will be resumed. Vigilance is capable of taking the probe ahead after two decades. When I get a complaint as the minister in charge of the Vigilance, I am duty-bound to order a probe,’’ he added. PATI-BEL had taken on the task of renovating several major road stretches in the state, with the project valued at Rs 216 crore. However, construction on the designated roads fell behind schedule between 2001 and 2006, reportedly due to delays in acquiring the necessary land—placing considerable strain on both PATI-BEL and project engineer Been. Just a month after Been died in November 2006, the then CPI(M) government transferred Kumar out of the PWD. He later served in the Defence Ministry under the UPA-1 administration.

After the Malaysian engineer's death, Kumar’s name had reportedly surfaced in the suicide note. Lee See Been alleged that Gyanesh Kumar, while serving as the secretary of the state PWD, demanded a bribe for clearing payment for the work.

The Kerala Home Department has directed the state to reopen a Vigilance investigation into alleged corruption in a road-related project from 2006. During that period, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar served as secretary of the state Public Works Department (PWD). The case has been reopened after Kerala's Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala directed a probe following the suicide of a Malaysian engineer, Lee See Been, who was then chief project manager of a major road work undertaken by PATI-BEL, an Indo-Malaysian venture, in the state. After the Malaysian engineer's death, Kumar’s name had reportedly surfaced in the suicide note. Lee See Been alleged that Gyanesh Kumar, while serving as the secretary of the state PWD, demanded a bribe for clearing payment for the work. The road project, named Kerala State Transport Project (KSTR), was funded by the World Bank. Chennithala confirmed on Sunday (October 4) that he had received a complaint that the Vigilance probe conducted in 2006 was compromised after external compulsion. “I have directed the Vigilance to probe into the matter thoroughly. Gyanesh Kumar’s name had figured in the suicide note of the Malaysian engineer. He had clearly mentioned Kumar’s name in his suicide note addressed to his wife as well as the company director.” He said, “Vigilance had examined the matter in 2006. However, the probe did not go ahead, although Kumar was transferred out of the PWD. Now, I have got a complaint from Congress leader Malayankeezhu Gopalakrishan regarding the issue. I had discussed the matter with Chief Minister V D Satheesan and decided to order a comprehensive probe in this regard." Also read: Gurugram techie dies by suicide in Noida amid debt and financial distress, say police Gyanesh Kumar transferred to Delhi under UPA-1 administration Chennithala further claimed that Gyanesh Kumar's transfer to Delhi on central deputation from the PWD was never returned to the state cadre. “The Vigilance will conduct a comprehensive probe and will take all legal steps. The probe held in 2006 was abandoned midway. Based on the fresh complaint, it will be resumed. Vigilance is capable of taking the probe ahead after two decades. When I get a complaint as the minister in charge of the Vigilance, I am duty-bound to order a probe,’’ he added. PATI-BEL had taken on the task of renovating several major road stretches in the state, with the project valued at Rs 216 crore. However, construction on the designated roads fell behind schedule between 2001 and 2006, reportedly due to delays in acquiring the necessary land—placing considerable strain on both PATI-BEL and project engineer Been. Just a month after Been died in November 2006, the then CPI(M) government transferred Kumar out of the PWD. He later served in the Defence Ministry under the UPA-1 administration.

After the Malaysian engineer's death, Kumar’s name had reportedly surfaced in the suicide note. Lee See Been alleged that Gyanesh Kumar, while serving as the secretary of the state PWD, demanded a bribe for clearing payment for the work.

Kerala reopens 2006 vigilance probe into engineer's suicide note naming CEC Gyanesh Kumar

The Election Commission on Wednesday night (Sep 29) removed the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) declaration added to Form 6, from its ECINET application portal in states where the revision has concluded. According to Indian Express report, the official confirmation comes four days after the ECI announced that “for non-SIR period, the Forms applicable as per Rules (the Registration of Electors Rules 1960) will be used.” The full Commission had decided on Sep 26 that the requirement would apply only during the exercise. Form 6 is the statutory form used by eligible citizens to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/election-commission-nine-decisions-sir-ecinet-form-6-internal-rift-1790507131449">Election Commission on 'damage control' : What do nine new decisions mean?</a><h2>What this means?</h2>The declaration -- which has been removed now -- requires new applicants to show details linking themselves or their parents or grandparents to electoral rolls prepared during an earlier SIR. While it has been removed for states where SIR has been completed, it remains available on the ECINET portal in states and Union Territories where the SIR is underway. Therefore, in states where SIR has concluded, the new voters seeking enrolment will only have to fill the statutory Form 6 prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 and will not have to furnish details linking themselves to earlier SIR.&nbsp;<h2>The ECI controversy&nbsp;</h2>The ECI found itself in a major political row after an Indian Express report claimed that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had objected to several points in the SIR at least 14 times in 10 months. Exposing the rift between the Commissioners and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, the report alleged that major decisions regarding voter registration, the deletion/restoration of names, and the handling of the electoral roll database were being issued unilaterally by the CEC without their knowledge or consent. Joshi had objected to changes to the form on the grounds that a form prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, could not be modified without amending the rules. Sandhu had concurred with him. They explained that Form 6 cannot be altered or appended without a legal amendment enacted through the Union Law Ministry.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/election-commission-sir-rti-response-an-jali-bhardwaj-june-24-order-1790516431918">SIR row: RTI response raises questions over EC’s claim of unanimous approval</a><h2>What was decided on Sep 26?</h2>The declaration asking new applicants to link themselves, their parents, or their grandparents to previous SIR rolls was the "additional declaration" that triggered internal dissent within the commission. On Sep 26, after the row created major controversy, the commissioners held a meeting. The ECI legally and procedurally decided that this declaration must only apply during active SIR periods and be entirely removed for non-SIR periods. It also decided that for any voter who receives an SIR notice for being "unmapped" or having "logical discrepancies," Booth Level Officers (BLOs) must physically visit their home to collect the required documents. The BLOs are then responsible for uploading them to the ECINet portal. Following the announcement, the technical removal took effect on Sep 29 late night.

The Election Commission has removed the SIR-linked declaration from Form 6 on its ECINET portal in states where the Special Intensive Revision has concluded. The move follows the EC’s September 26 clarification that standard forms would apply outside SIR periods.

The Election Commission on Wednesday night (Sep 29) removed the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) declaration added to Form 6, from its ECINET application portal in states where the revision has concluded. According to Indian Express report, the official confirmation comes four days after the ECI announced that “for non-SIR period, the Forms applicable as per Rules (the Registration of Electors Rules 1960) will be used.” The full Commission had decided on Sep 26 that the requirement would apply only during the exercise. Form 6 is the statutory form used by eligible citizens to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll. Also Read: Election Commission on 'damage control' : What do nine new decisions mean? What this means? The declaration -- which has been removed now -- requires new applicants to show details linking themselves or their parents or grandparents to electoral rolls prepared during an earlier SIR. While it has been removed for states where SIR has been completed, it remains available on the ECINET portal in states and Union Territories where the SIR is underway. Therefore, in states where SIR has concluded, the new voters seeking enrolment will only have to fill the statutory Form 6 prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 and will not have to furnish details linking themselves to earlier SIR. The ECI controversy The ECI found itself in a major political row after an Indian Express report claimed that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had objected to several points in the SIR at least 14 times in 10 months. Exposing the rift between the Commissioners and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, the report alleged that major decisions regarding voter registration, the deletion/restoration of names, and the handling of the electoral roll database were being issued unilaterally by the CEC without their knowledge or consent. Joshi had objected to changes to the form on the grounds that a form prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, could not be modified without amending the rules. Sandhu had concurred with him. They explained that Form 6 cannot be altered or appended without a legal amendment enacted through the Union Law Ministry. Also Read: SIR row: RTI response raises questions over EC’s claim of unanimous approval What was decided on Sep 26? The declaration asking new applicants to link themselves, their parents, or their grandparents to previous SIR rolls was the "additional declaration" that triggered internal dissent within the commission. On Sep 26, after the row created major controversy, the commissioners held a meeting. The ECI legally and procedurally decided that this declaration must only apply during active SIR periods and be entirely removed for non-SIR periods. It also decided that for any voter who receives an SIR notice for being "unmapped" or having "logical discrepancies," Booth Level Officers (BLOs) must physically visit their home to collect the required documents. The BLOs are then responsible for uploading them to the ECINet portal. Following the announcement, the technical removal took effect on Sep 29 late night.

The Election Commission has removed the SIR-linked declaration from Form 6 on its ECINET portal in states where the Special Intensive Revision has concluded. The move follows the EC’s September 26 clarification that standard forms would apply outside SIR periods.

EC rolls back SIR add-on in Form 6 that was objected by two commissioners: What this means

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court demanding the suspension of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, along with a declaration that decisions on matters pending before the Supreme Court cannot be taken unilaterally by the head of the constitutional body. The petition has been filed by Rakesh Kumar Singh under Article 32 of the Constitution. The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. A writ of quo warranto was sought by the petitioner, calling upon the CEC “to show under what authority he has acted, and continues to act, as though entitled individually to exercise the collective decision-making power vested by Article 324 in the Election Commission as a body.”<h3>CEC position cannot be treated as institution</h3>The petition argued that Article 324(1) places the superintendence, direction and control of elections with “a Commission," not with an individual Chief Election Commissioner. Although Article 324(3) names the CEC as Chairman, this constitutional position cannot be treated as the institution itself. It also relied on Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. Under this provision, the Commission can regulate its own procedure by unanimous decision; its business should be conducted unanimously as far as possible, and any differences are settled by majority. One of the examples it cited is the alleged change to Form-6 under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, in July 2026. The revised form reportedly requires applicants to state whether they, their parents or their grandparents "exist" in the electoral roll used in the last Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The petition pointed to notes by Commissioners Joshi (May 16, 2026) and Sandhu (May 19 and August 13, 2026), who objected that the change was unauthorised and illegal because the Rules had not been amended."

The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court demanding the suspension of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, along with a declaration that decisions on matters pending before the Supreme Court cannot be taken unilaterally by the head of the constitutional body. The petition has been filed by Rakesh Kumar Singh under Article 32 of the Constitution. The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. A writ of quo warranto was sought by the petitioner, calling upon the CEC “to show under what authority he has acted, and continues to act, as though entitled individually to exercise the collective decision-making power vested by Article 324 in the Election Commission as a body.” CEC position cannot be treated as institution The petition argued that Article 324(1) places the superintendence, direction and control of elections with “a Commission," not with an individual Chief Election Commissioner. Although Article 324(3) names the CEC as Chairman, this constitutional position cannot be treated as the institution itself. It also relied on Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. Under this provision, the Commission can regulate its own procedure by unanimous decision; its business should be conducted unanimously as far as possible, and any differences are settled by majority. One of the examples it cited is the alleged change to Form-6 under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, in July 2026. The revised form reportedly requires applicants to state whether they, their parents or their grandparents "exist" in the electoral roll used in the last Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The petition pointed to notes by Commissioners Joshi (May 16, 2026) and Sandhu (May 19 and August 13, 2026), who objected that the change was unauthorised and illegal because the Rules had not been amended."

The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.

Petition in SC seeks suspension of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, says Election Commission decisions must be collective

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi met at the Election Commission headquarters in New Delhi on Saturday (Sep 26), amid questions over internal differences within the poll panel and the functioning of its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.The meeting, held at 3 pm, was followed by a detailed press note in which the Election Commission addressed several issues, including reports of dissent, the SIR process, Form 6, ECINET and a letter sent to the Cabinet Secretary.The clarification came after a report by The Indian Express claimed Sandhu and Joshi had objected multiple times to decisions taken by the Commission. The ECI, however, said the SIR order issued on June 24, 2025, covering all states and Union Territories, had the “unanimous approval of the Commission”.The Commission said the schedules for 12 states and UTs issued on October 27, 2025, and for another 19 states and UTs issued on May 14, 2026, were also approved unanimously.<h2>EC explains Cabinet Secretary letter</h2>The poll panel also sought to clarify the controversy surrounding its communication to the Cabinet Secretary. It said the letter was “not related to any policy matter of the Commission or IT division but related to working of an officer on deputation to the ECI”“The work redistribution orders issued by the concerned officer were not actually implemented after the orders of the two Commissioners, and the oversight over the IT division by the DEC was never actually withdrawn,” the ECI added in its press note.<h2>New process for SIR-flagged voters</h2>The Commission said Booth Level Officers will visit voters flagged as “unmapped” or having logical discrepancies to collect documents and upload them on ECINET.Such voters “need not be called for hearing to ERO/AERO office”. Hearings will be held only in exceptional cases and preferably online. An adult family member can also attend on behalf of the elector.The ECI directed officials to organise help desks and special camps for labourers, homeless people, poor citizens and those living in night shelters.<h2>ECINET to undergo review</h2>The Commission has also formed a committee headed by a Senior Deputy Election Commissioner, with an independent IIT or IIIT expert, to review ECINET's compliance with electoral laws.Meanwhile, SIR claims and objections deadlines were extended in Delhi and Maharashtra. Delhi's filing deadline is now October 30, while Maharashtra’s is October 12.The ECI said SIR has been completed in 20 states and UTs, including Bihar and West Bengal. The final elector count will be known after the remaining Phase III states complete the process.

CEC Gyanesh Kumar-led Election Commission meeting addresses SIR dissent reports, clarifies unanimous approvals, eases voter hearings, orders ECINET review and extends claims deadlines.

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi met at the Election Commission headquarters in New Delhi on Saturday (Sep 26), amid questions over internal differences within the poll panel and the functioning of its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. The meeting, held at 3 pm, was followed by a detailed press note in which the Election Commission addressed several issues, including reports of dissent, the SIR process, Form 6, ECINET and a letter sent to the Cabinet Secretary. The clarification came after a report by The Indian Express claimed Sandhu and Joshi had objected multiple times to decisions taken by the Commission. The ECI, however, said the SIR order issued on June 24, 2025, covering all states and Union Territories, had the “unanimous approval of the Commission”. The Commission said the schedules for 12 states and UTs issued on October 27, 2025, and for another 19 states and UTs issued on May 14, 2026, were also approved unanimously. EC explains Cabinet Secretary letter The poll panel also sought to clarify the controversy surrounding its communication to the Cabinet Secretary. It said the letter was “not related to any policy matter of the Commission or IT division but related to working of an officer on deputation to the ECI” “The work redistribution orders issued by the concerned officer were not actually implemented after the orders of the two Commissioners, and the oversight over the IT division by the DEC was never actually withdrawn,” the ECI added in its press note. New process for SIR-flagged voters The Commission said Booth Level Officers will visit voters flagged as “unmapped” or having logical discrepancies to collect documents and upload them on ECINET. Such voters “need not be called for hearing to ERO/AERO office”. Hearings will be held only in exceptional cases and preferably online. An adult family member can also attend on behalf of the elector. The ECI directed officials to organise help desks and special camps for labourers, homeless people, poor citizens and those living in night shelters. ECINET to undergo review The Commission has also formed a committee headed by a Senior Deputy Election Commissioner, with an independent IIT or IIIT expert, to review ECINET's compliance with electoral laws. Meanwhile, SIR claims and objections deadlines were extended in Delhi and Maharashtra. Delhi's filing deadline is now October 30, while Maharashtra’s is October 12. The ECI said SIR has been completed in 20 states and UTs, including Bihar and West Bengal. The final elector count will be known after the remaining Phase III states complete the process.

CEC Gyanesh Kumar-led Election Commission meeting addresses SIR dissent reports, clarifies unanimous approvals, eases voter hearings, orders ECINET review and extends claims deadlines.

SIR row: Gyanesh Kumar-led ECI clarifies dissent claims, says key decisions approved unanimously

Chief Election Commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar, finds himself in the eye of the storm following reports alleging a rift between two other election commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. They have reportedly objected 14 times within 10 months to several key decisions of the ECI, including developing new modules and portals for centralising the electoral database without their prior approval, alteration of Form 6 for new voter registration without any formal government notification and disenfranchisement of voters in Special Intensive Revision.&nbsp;All three Election Commissioners are completely equal in power, status, and decision-making authority. The Chief Election Commissioner is the one amongst equals to head the institution as chairman, but it does not grant him overruling powers. So, once again, the Election Commission in the world's largest democracy is facing serious credibility challenges, and discussion surrounds one man, Gyanesh Kumar Gupta.&nbsp;<h2>Who is Gyanesh Kumar Gupta?</h2>Gyanesh Kumar was born in Agra in 1964, and studied at IIT Kanpur (BTech) and did coursework in environmental economics at Harvard. He was a 1988 batch in the IAS cadre and served in Kerala with both Left and Congress governments. His last role as administrator was under Amit Shah as Cooperation Secretary. He then retired in January 2024 and joined as Election Commissioner within two months and later took the reins of the Indian apex polling body as the 26th Chief Election Commissioner of India on February 19, 2025.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-xi-us-china-mutual-respect-trade-ai-security-state-visit-1790261968733">Trump hails ‘mutual respect’ in US-China ties while welcoming Xi for second state visit</a>The appointment was controversial not only because the Government amended provisions of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023,<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/why-is-the-2023-ec-appointment-law-under-sc-scrutiny-why-was-it-referred-to-cji-1790236566647"> which changed the selection committee</a>, but also because, just before his appointment, Election Commissioner Arun Goel resigned without completing his tenure. He cited “personal reasons” for his resignation. But several reasons fuelled immense turmoil: firstly, he resigned just ahead of the 2024 General Assembly Election. Secondly, out of the three commissioners, another commissioner, Anup Chandra Pandey, had already retired in February 2024, so he would have known that his resignation would lead to a thinning of leadership just ahead of a crunch election. Thirdly, media reports widely pointed to an internal rift between Goel and then CEC Rajiv Kumar. Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu joined on March 14 to fill the empty seats.Another notable mention in Gyanesh Kumar's portfolio is that he was part of the ‘crack team’ tasked with mapping the legal and administrative framework for removing Article 370, according to a <a href="https://www.newslaundry.com/2026/03/14/from-kashmir-to-ayodhya-to-sir-the-making-of-indias-most-divisive-chief-election-commissioner">Newslaundry profile </a>which cites a book published by BlueKraft Digital Foundation, an organisation which has interviews with Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and several bureaucrats, and “offers a largely hagiographical account of the planning.” As Joint Secretary and Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs and Secretary in the Ministry of Cooperation, he was also helping with the formation of Ram Mandir Trust, which became extremely controversial after the recent embezzlement scam.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bishop-robert-barron-communism-comeback-us-fulton-sheen-beatification-1790256985319">Trump's Catholic ally Bishop Barron warns communism is ‘making a comeback’ in US ahead of Sheen beatification</a>Currently, Gyanesh Kumar's daughter, Medha Roopam, District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar, is in the middle of a legal battle for the preventive detention of a 24-year-old Delhi University student and activist, Akriti Chaudhary, under the stringent National Security Act (NSA) following labour protests in Noida. The Allahabad High Court has already ruled against her and slammed her for being “despotic” and turning UP into an Orwellian dystopia. She then immediately appealed to the Supreme Court, which stayed the ₹5 lakh fine to be paid from her salary to the student and the adverse remarks made against her; however, it quashed the NSA against Akriti.Now Gyanesh Kumar is facing calls for resignation, criminal investigation from opposition leaders, with the newly formed satirical Cockroach Janta Party threatening a nationwide protest.

Who is Gyanesh Kumar? Here is a look at the CEC’s career, appointment and the reported ECI rift over voter rolls, Form 6 and SIR.

Chief Election Commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar, finds himself in the eye of the storm following reports alleging a rift between two other election commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. They have reportedly objected 14 times within 10 months to several key decisions of the ECI, including developing new modules and portals for centralising the electoral database without their prior approval, alteration of Form 6 for new voter registration without any formal government notification and disenfranchisement of voters in Special Intensive Revision. All three Election Commissioners are completely equal in power, status, and decision-making authority. The Chief Election Commissioner is the one amongst equals to head the institution as chairman, but it does not grant him overruling powers. So, once again, the Election Commission in the world's largest democracy is facing serious credibility challenges, and discussion surrounds one man, Gyanesh Kumar Gupta. Who is Gyanesh Kumar Gupta? Gyanesh Kumar was born in Agra in 1964, and studied at IIT Kanpur (BTech) and did coursework in environmental economics at Harvard. He was a 1988 batch in the IAS cadre and served in Kerala with both Left and Congress governments. His last role as administrator was under Amit Shah as Cooperation Secretary. He then retired in January 2024 and joined as Election Commissioner within two months and later took the reins of the Indian apex polling body as the 26th Chief Election Commissioner of India on February 19, 2025. Also Read: Trump hails ‘mutual respect’ in US-China ties while welcoming Xi for second state visit The appointment was controversial not only because the Government amended provisions of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which changed the selection committee, but also because, just before his appointment, Election Commissioner Arun Goel resigned without completing his tenure. He cited “personal reasons” for his resignation. But several reasons fuelled immense turmoil: firstly, he resigned just ahead of the 2024 General Assembly Election. Secondly, out of the three commissioners, another commissioner, Anup Chandra Pandey, had already retired in February 2024, so he would have known that his resignation would lead to a thinning of leadership just ahead of a crunch election. Thirdly, media reports widely pointed to an internal rift between Goel and then CEC Rajiv Kumar. Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu joined on March 14 to fill the empty seats. Another notable mention in Gyanesh Kumar's portfolio is that he was part of the ‘crack team’ tasked with mapping the legal and administrative framework for removing Article 370, according to a Newslaundry profile which cites a book published by BlueKraft Digital Foundation, an organisation which has interviews with Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and several bureaucrats, and “offers a largely hagiographical account of the planning.” As Joint Secretary and Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs and Secretary in the Ministry of Cooperation, he was also helping with the formation of Ram Mandir Trust, which became extremely controversial after the recent embezzlement scam. Also Read: Trump's Catholic ally Bishop Barron warns communism is ‘making a comeback’ in US ahead of Sheen beatification Currently, Gyanesh Kumar's daughter, Medha Roopam, District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar, is in the middle of a legal battle for the preventive detention of a 24-year-old Delhi University student and activist, Akriti Chaudhary, under the stringent National Security Act (NSA) following labour protests in Noida. The Allahabad High Court has already ruled against her and slammed her for being “despotic” and turning UP into an Orwellian dystopia. She then immediately appealed to the Supreme Court, which stayed the ₹5 lakh fine to be paid from her salary to the student and the adverse remarks made against her; however, it quashed the NSA against Akriti. Now Gyanesh Kumar is facing calls for resignation, criminal investigation from opposition leaders, with the newly formed satirical Cockroach Janta Party threatening a nationwide protest.

Who is Gyanesh Kumar? Here is a look at the CEC’s career, appointment and the reported ECI rift over voter rolls, Form 6 and SIR.

Gyanesh Kumar: Who is the CEC at centre of ECI rift over voter rolls?

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke on Thursday threatened to launch a nationwide agitation if Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar failed to resign within 48 hours. Dipke claimed that Gyanesh Kumar is the “biggest anti-national in the country”. He said that the government was deciding who gets to vote and who does not since Gyanesh Kumar took over as the Chief Election Commissioner. This comes as a response to the Indian Express investigation, which alleged an internal rift within the top leadership over several key decisions of the apex polling authority of India."If within 48 hours Gyanesh Kumar doesn't resign, the Cockroach Janata Party will start a nationwide agitation. We won't step back till the time Gyanesh Kumar resigns," said CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke in a press conference on Thursday. &nbsp;The Cockroach Janta Party put forward three demands-&nbsp;<ul><li>Resignation of Gyanesh Kumar and initiating criminal proceedings against him.</li><li>Rolling back of the pre-SIR (January 2025) voter list.</li><li>Repealing the 2023 law on appointment of the Election Commissioner</li></ul>“In total, more than 13 crore votes have been deleted. This is not a small number. In the 2024 Lok Sabha election, the margin between the opposition and the ruling party (NDA) was just 2%,” said CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke. He argued that deleting 13 crore voters is roughly equivalent to the deletion of 13-14% of the total votes.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/harvey-weinstein-sentenced-15-years-miriam-haley-sexual-assault-1790182424219">Harvey Weinstein gets 15-year prison sentence over Miriam Haley assault</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://x.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Delhi: Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) Founder Abhijeet Dipke says, &quot;A report concerning the Election Commission that surfaced yesterday proves that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is the country&#39;s biggest traitor. He is the biggest anti-national in this country,… <a href="https://t.co/HfKBMeVpgu">pic.twitter.com/HfKBMeVpgu</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2103049327354822865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

“The BJP failed to secure a majority in the 2024 election. The panic button was pressed when they fell short of that majority... They realised then that the mood of the country was shifting and that regional forces were emerging very strongly, be it Uddhav Thackeray in Maharashtra, the NCP, Stalin, Pinarayi Vijayan, Arvind Kejriwal, or Mamata Banerjee. These chief ministers were targeted and defeated one by one.”“In West Bengal, 50,000 votes were deleted from Mamata Banerjee’s constituency, and she lost by a margin of around 15,000 votes. In MK Stalin’s constituency, 100,000 votes were deleted, and he lost by about 45,000 votes. In Delhi, 40,000 votes were deleted from Arvind Kejriwal’s constituency, and he lost by a margin of 4000-5000 votes," said Dipke.&nbsp;The fallout is a direct reaction to the Indian Express investigative report, which quoted internal communication within the Election Commission to suggest that two election commissioners have repeatedly objected to several key decisions, including developing new modules and portals for centralising the electoral database without their prior approval, alteration of Form 6 for new voter registration without any formal government notification and disenfranchisement of voters in Special Intensive Revision. They in fact tried to raise their concerns and wrote separately to Cabinet Secretary TV Somanathan. The Election Commission tried to shrug off the concerns by saying that differing opinions are normal in any institution, but it did not issue a specific response to the concerns raised in the report.&nbsp;

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijit Dipke has demanded Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and threatened a nationwide agitation over voter-list revisions.

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke on Thursday threatened to launch a nationwide agitation if Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar failed to resign within 48 hours. Dipke claimed that Gyanesh Kumar is the “biggest anti-national in the country”. He said that the government was deciding who gets to vote and who does not since Gyanesh Kumar took over as the Chief Election Commissioner. This comes as a response to the Indian Express investigation, which alleged an internal rift within the top leadership over several key decisions of the apex polling authority of India. "If within 48 hours Gyanesh Kumar doesn't resign, the Cockroach Janata Party will start a nationwide agitation. We won't step back till the time Gyanesh Kumar resigns," said CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke in a press conference on Thursday. The Cockroach Janta Party put forward three demands- Resignation of Gyanesh Kumar and initiating criminal proceedings against him. Rolling back of the pre-SIR (January 2025) voter list. Repealing the 2023 law on appointment of the Election Commissioner “In total, more than 13 crore votes have been deleted. This is not a small number. In the 2024 Lok Sabha election, the margin between the opposition and the ruling party (NDA) was just 2%,” said CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke. He argued that deleting 13 crore voters is roughly equivalent to the deletion of 13-14% of the total votes. Also Read: Harvey Weinstein gets 15-year prison sentence over Miriam Haley assault

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijit Dipke has demanded Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and threatened a nationwide agitation over voter-list revisions.

Cockroach Janta Party gives Gyanesh Kumar 48 hours to resign, threatens nationwide protest

The Election Commission of India's public unity have been put into question by an investigation by the Indian Express, which shows that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally objected 14 times over a period of ten months, four times on a single day, to decisions and processes under CEC Gyanesh Kumar specifically tied to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The exercise has affected roughly 13 crore voters across India.The ECI has attempted to shrug off the controversy, stating that differing opinions among Election Commission members are “a normal part” of the decision-making, while opposition parties have voiced their concern and demanded impeachment of the Chief Election Commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-ukraine-war-kyiv-strikes-zelensky-trump-ufa-refinery-1790159202626">Ukraine hits Ufa oil refinery as Russia strikes Kyiv after Zelensky-Trump talks</a><h2>Centralisation of Electoral Roll</h2>According to the Express Investigation, Election Commissioner Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi were kept in the dark about the decisions of ECI; the two commissioners even wrote to the Cabinet Secretary complaining about the change of work allocation that resulted in reduced oversight of the IT backbone of the electoral rolls. In fact, that was the key point of dispute: centralisation of the voter database. The two commissioners flagged that the Electoral Registration Officer, the statutory authority of each constituency's electoral roll, did not have "proper and complete access" to the database in ECINet. In May 2025, Joshi sought an audit by outside IIT experts to certify that “no one, except the concerned statutory authorities, has credentials to make any change in the (voter) database.”&nbsp;It questioned the only explanation given by the Election Commission for years to deny any allegation of electoral manipulation: that the electoral rolls were decentralised. The investigation claimed that the Election Commission's Director General of IT, Seema Khanna, had “no legal authority to restrict proper and complete access and freedom to operate,” the ECInet to the EROs. These discrepancies had led to the overriding of EROs and the blocking of eligible voters. By April 16, Sandhu was recording concerns that the IT division was developing new modules and portals without bringing them to his knowledge, saying he'd learned of some developments through the media rather than a proper briefing.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/gaza-dominates-unga-81-guterres-lula-erdogan-israel-war-1790096337223">World leaders repeatedly call Gaza crisis ‘genocide’ as Israel’s war dominates opening sessions of UNGA</a><h2>Form 6 dispute</h2>Alongside the IT dispute, another slugfest broke out over the alteration of Form 6 – statutory in nature – which included new questions about first-time voters' parents and grandparents appearing on the “electoral roll of last SIR.” &nbsp;The Form 6 was linked to the forms of the SIR exercise, which are non-statutory and “a one-time measure and exception”. The portal was coded so that applicants could not proceed with or submit their Form 6 application until this SIR mapping section was answered, acting as a technical gatekeeper. Sandhu and Joshi argued the form is embedded in the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, and cannot be altered without formal government notification. Despite the objection, it went live on the portal anyway. Sandhu warned that it risked harassing and disenfranchising first-time voters.&nbsp;<h2>Reactions from ECI and Opposition</h2>ECI sources told journalists that all decisions of the Commission, including SIR, have been unanimous and made with the approval of both Election Commissioners and the CEC; internal differing was part of the decision-making process, directly contradicting the premise of the Express investigation. Despite the attempt, it did not defuse the story; rather triggered the political community, specifically the opposition parties, with repeated calls for the removal of the CEC, Gyanesh Kumar. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra called it a “treason”. Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal argued that most decisions since June 25, 2025, were not taken by majority despite Joshi and Sandhu's objections, and said the CEC acted without reference to the other two members, in violation of the Commission's own rules. Others like Akhilesh Yadav and CPI(M) MP John Brittas renewed demands for Kumar's removal, with Brittas noting that an April 2026 removal notice already has around 70 signatures.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Two Election Commissioners reportedly objected 14 times over SIR-related decisions for 10 months, flagging concerns over voter rolls, ECINet and ‘illegal, unauthorised’ changes to Form 6 

The Election Commission of India's public unity have been put into question by an investigation by the Indian Express, which shows that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally objected 14 times over a period of ten months, four times on a single day, to decisions and processes under CEC Gyanesh Kumar specifically tied to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The exercise has affected roughly 13 crore voters across India. The ECI has attempted to shrug off the controversy, stating that differing opinions among Election Commission members are “a normal part” of the decision-making, while opposition parties have voiced their concern and demanded impeachment of the Chief Election Commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar. Also Read: Ukraine hits Ufa oil refinery as Russia strikes Kyiv after Zelensky-Trump talks Centralisation of Electoral Roll According to the Express Investigation, Election Commissioner Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi were kept in the dark about the decisions of ECI; the two commissioners even wrote to the Cabinet Secretary complaining about the change of work allocation that resulted in reduced oversight of the IT backbone of the electoral rolls. In fact, that was the key point of dispute: centralisation of the voter database. The two commissioners flagged that the Electoral Registration Officer, the statutory authority of each constituency's electoral roll, did not have "proper and complete access" to the database in ECINet. In May 2025, Joshi sought an audit by outside IIT experts to certify that “no one, except the concerned statutory authorities, has credentials to make any change in the (voter) database.” It questioned the only explanation given by the Election Commission for years to deny any allegation of electoral manipulation: that the electoral rolls were decentralised. The investigation claimed that the Election Commission's Director General of IT, Seema Khanna, had “no legal authority to restrict proper and complete access and freedom to operate,” the ECInet to the EROs. These discrepancies had led to the overriding of EROs and the blocking of eligible voters. By April 16, Sandhu was recording concerns that the IT division was developing new modules and portals without bringing them to his knowledge, saying he'd learned of some developments through the media rather than a proper briefing. Also Read: World leaders repeatedly call Gaza crisis ‘genocide’ as Israel’s war dominates opening sessions of UNGA Form 6 dispute Alongside the IT dispute, another slugfest broke out over the alteration of Form 6 – statutory in nature – which included new questions about first-time voters' parents and grandparents appearing on the “electoral roll of last SIR.” The Form 6 was linked to the forms of the SIR exercise, which are non-statutory and “a one-time measure and exception”. The portal was coded so that applicants could not proceed with or submit their Form 6 application until this SIR mapping section was answered, acting as a technical gatekeeper. Sandhu and Joshi argued the form is embedded in the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, and cannot be altered without formal government notification. Despite the objection, it went live on the portal anyway. Sandhu warned that it risked harassing and disenfranchising first-time voters. Reactions from ECI and Opposition ECI sources told journalists that all decisions of the Commission, including SIR, have been unanimous and made with the approval of both Election Commissioners and the CEC; internal differing was part of the decision-making process, directly contradicting the premise of the Express investigation. Despite the attempt, it did not defuse the story; rather triggered the political community, specifically the opposition parties, with repeated calls for the removal of the CEC, Gyanesh Kumar. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra called it a “treason”. Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal argued that most decisions since June 25, 2025, were not taken by majority despite Joshi and Sandhu's objections, and said the CEC acted without reference to the other two members, in violation of the Commission's own rules. Others like Akhilesh Yadav and CPI(M) MP John Brittas renewed demands for Kumar's removal, with Brittas noting that an April 2026 removal notice already has around 70 signatures.

Two Election Commissioners reportedly objected 14 times over SIR-related decisions for 10 months, flagging concerns over voter rolls, ECINet and ‘illegal, unauthorised’ changes to Form 6&nbsp;

ECI rift? Two Election Commissioners quietly fought the CEC Gyanesh Kumar for 10 months

As many as 130 Lok Sabha MPs and 63 Rajya Sabha MPs from the opposition benches in the two Houses have signed a notice seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar from his post, sources said on Thursday. The notice is likely to be submitted in at least one of the two Houses on Friday, though it was not clear in which House it would be brought first, reported PTI, citing sources. An opposition leader said that MPs showed great enthusiasm in signing the notice, with several lawmakers coming forward to sign the notice on Thursday, even as the requisite numbers had already been achieved.&nbsp;According to rules, at least 100 MPs must sign a notice seeking the removal of the CEC in the Lok Sabha, while the required strength in the Rajya Sabha stands at 50.If submitted, this would mark the first time that a notice has been given seeking the removal of a chief election commissioner.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/oil-tanker-with-indian-captain-went-dark-to-cross-high-risk-strait-of-hormuz-reach-mumbai-1773315721972">Oil tanker, with Indian captain, went ‘dark’ to cross high-risk Strait of Hormuz, reach Mumbai</a>&nbsp;The notice has been signed by members of parliament from all the INDIA bloc parties, the source said. Even MPs from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which is no longer officially part of the bloc, have signed the notice in a bid to group up against the government, said another source.&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Seven charges listed in notice against CEC Gyanesh Kumar</h2>&nbsp;The report suggested that seven charges have been listed in the notice against the CEC Gyanesh Kumar, ranging from “partisan and discriminatory conduct in office” to “deliberate obstruction of investigation of electoral fraud” and “mass disenfranchisement.”&nbsp;The Opposition parties have been repeatedly accusing the CEC of aiding the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on several occasions and blamed him after suffering electoral losses.&nbsp;The allegations intensified particularly after the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise was started by the Election Commission in several states where elections are due in the coming days. Opposition leaders claim that SIR was aimed at benefiting the ruling party.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-says-it-struck-taleghan-compound-where-iran-advanced-its-nuclear-programme-1773320992019">Israel says it struck Taleghan compound, where Iran ‘advanced’ its nuclear programme</a>&nbsp;Besides, concerns have also been raised regarding the conduct of the exercise in West Bengal. Trinamool Congress (TMC) supremo and Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has accused the Election Commission of deleting genuine voters during the electoral roll revision exercise. Opposition parties also challenged the exercise in court.&nbsp;Mamata is staging an indefinite protest against the deletion of names during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bengal.&nbsp;<h2>Process for CEC’s removal similar to that for SC or HC judge</h2>&nbsp;The procedure for the CEC’s removal is similar to that for removing a judge of the Supreme Court of India or a high court. The motion for CEC’s removal may be introduced in either House of Parliament and must be passed by a special majority, i.e., a majority of the total membership of the House and a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-passes-controversial-law-for-ethnic-unity-makes-it-must-for-minorities-to-learn-mandarin-1773328454387">China passes controversial law for ethnic unity, makes it must for minorities to learn Mandarin</a>&nbsp;If notices for such a motion are given on the same day in both Houses of Parliament, no committee will be constituted unless the motion has been admitted in both Houses. Once the motion is admitted in both Houses, a committee will be jointly constituted by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

As per rules, at least 100 MPs must sign a notice seeking the removal of the CEC in the Lok Sabha, while the required strength in the Rajya Sabha stands at 50. If submitted, this would mark the first time that a notice has been given seeking the removal of a chief election commissioner.

As many as 130 Lok Sabha MPs and 63 Rajya Sabha MPs from the opposition benches in the two Houses have signed a notice seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar from his post, sources said on Thursday. The notice is likely to be submitted in at least one of the two Houses on Friday, though it was not clear in which House it would be brought first, reported PTI, citing sources. An opposition leader said that MPs showed great enthusiasm in signing the notice, with several lawmakers coming forward to sign the notice on Thursday, even as the requisite numbers had already been achieved. According to rules, at least 100 MPs must sign a notice seeking the removal of the CEC in the Lok Sabha, while the required strength in the Rajya Sabha stands at 50. If submitted, this would mark the first time that a notice has been given seeking the removal of a chief election commissioner. Also Read: Oil tanker, with Indian captain, went ‘dark’ to cross high-risk Strait of Hormuz, reach Mumbai The notice has been signed by members of parliament from all the INDIA bloc parties, the source said. Even MPs from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which is no longer officially part of the bloc, have signed the notice in a bid to group up against the government, said another source. Seven charges listed in notice against CEC Gyanesh Kumar The report suggested that seven charges have been listed in the notice against the CEC Gyanesh Kumar, ranging from “partisan and discriminatory conduct in office” to “deliberate obstruction of investigation of electoral fraud” and “mass disenfranchisement.” The Opposition parties have been repeatedly accusing the CEC of aiding the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on several occasions and blamed him after suffering electoral losses. The allegations intensified particularly after the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise was started by the Election Commission in several states where elections are due in the coming days. Opposition leaders claim that SIR was aimed at benefiting the ruling party. Also Read: Israel says it struck Taleghan compound, where Iran ‘advanced’ its nuclear programme Besides, concerns have also been raised regarding the conduct of the exercise in West Bengal. Trinamool Congress (TMC) supremo and Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has accused the Election Commission of deleting genuine voters during the electoral roll revision exercise. Opposition parties also challenged the exercise in court. Mamata is staging an indefinite protest against the deletion of names during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bengal. Process for CEC’s removal similar to that for SC or HC judge The procedure for the CEC’s removal is similar to that for removing a judge of the Supreme Court of India or a high court. The motion for CEC’s removal may be introduced in either House of Parliament and must be passed by a special majority, i.e., a majority of the total membership of the House and a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. Also Read: China passes controversial law for ethnic unity, makes it must for minorities to learn Mandarin If notices for such a motion are given on the same day in both Houses of Parliament, no committee will be constituted unless the motion has been admitted in both Houses. Once the motion is admitted in both Houses, a committee will be jointly constituted by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

As per rules, at least 100 MPs must sign a notice seeking the removal of the CEC in the Lok Sabha, while the required strength in the Rajya Sabha stands at 50. If submitted, this would mark the first time that a notice has been given seeking the removal of a chief election commissioner.

193 opposition MPs sign notice seeking removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar from post

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar said on Monday that police will use horses for patrolling in 250 polling booths in the Diara region of Bihar. While patrolling, police will also travel by boats to around 197 stations, according to the news agency PTI.&nbsp;Speaking at a press conference while announcing the schedule of the Bihar assembly polls, Gyanesh Kumar stated that ballot papers on the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) will show colour photographs of the candidate.&nbsp;"In Diara region, patrolling will be done by police using horses in at least 250 polling stations. Similarly, polling parties will travel by boat in 197 polling stations," Kumar said.&nbsp;A total of 90,712 polling booths will be established across Bihar for the assembly elections, with more than 7.42 crore people eligible to vote. Since 2015, ballot papers on EVMs have carried black-and-white photographs of candidates, which many voters have reportedly found hard to identify.&nbsp;"The serial number will also be displayed more prominently on the machines," Kumar said. The elections of Bihar's 243 assembly constituencies will take place in two phases on November 6 and 11, with the counting of votes scheduled for November 14.<h3>Gyanesh Kumar says a revision of the voter list is needed</h3>In addition, Gyanesh Kumar said that revision of voter lists is needed before every election, and a review following the polls won't be in accordance with the law, countering the offensive of opposition on the Special Intensive Revision in poll-bound Bihar.&nbsp;He added that the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar resulted in the purification of the voter list of the state after 22 years. "We congratulate the voters of India. Thank you to everyone for the successful SIR process. I appeal to all the voters of Bihar to celebrate this festival of democracy with the same enthusiasm as you celebrate Chhath. Everyone should vote and ensure their participation," he also said.

A total of 90,712 polling booths will be established across Bihar for the assembly elections, with more than 7.42 crore people eligible to vote. Since 2015, ballot papers on EVMs have carried black-and-white photographs of candidates, which many voters have reportedly found hard to identify.

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar said on Monday that police will use horses for patrolling in 250 polling booths in the Diara region of Bihar. While patrolling, police will also travel by boats to around 197 stations, according to the news agency PTI. Speaking at a press conference while announcing the schedule of the Bihar assembly polls, Gyanesh Kumar stated that ballot papers on the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) will show colour photographs of the candidate. "In Diara region, patrolling will be done by police using horses in at least 250 polling stations. Similarly, polling parties will travel by boat in 197 polling stations," Kumar said. A total of 90,712 polling booths will be established across Bihar for the assembly elections, with more than 7.42 crore people eligible to vote. Since 2015, ballot papers on EVMs have carried black-and-white photographs of candidates, which many voters have reportedly found hard to identify. "The serial number will also be displayed more prominently on the machines," Kumar said. The elections of Bihar's 243 assembly constituencies will take place in two phases on November 6 and 11, with the counting of votes scheduled for November 14. Gyanesh Kumar says a revision of the voter list is needed In addition, Gyanesh Kumar said that revision of voter lists is needed before every election, and a review following the polls won't be in accordance with the law, countering the offensive of opposition on the Special Intensive Revision in poll-bound Bihar. He added that the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar resulted in the purification of the voter list of the state after 22 years. "We congratulate the voters of India. Thank you to everyone for the successful SIR process. I appeal to all the voters of Bihar to celebrate this festival of democracy with the same enthusiasm as you celebrate Chhath. Everyone should vote and ensure their participation," he also said.

A total of 90,712 polling booths will be established across Bihar for the assembly elections, with more than 7.42 crore people eligible to vote. Since 2015, ballot papers on EVMs have carried black-and-white photographs of candidates, which many voters have reportedly found hard to identify.

Bihar assembly elections 2025: Police to patrol on horses, boats? Here's what we know

The Election Commission of India on Thursday denied Rahul Gandhi's allegation that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is shielding people who are involved in voter deletion schemes. In response to Rahul Gandhi, the Election Commission asserted, "Allegations made by Shri Rahul Gandhi are incorrect and baseless. No deletion of any vote can be done online by any member of the public, as misconceived by Shri Rahul Gandhi.”&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-75-top-policy-decisions-1758088742745">PM Modi at 75: 10 major policy decisions that defined his decade in power</a>&nbsp;According to a report by The Hindu on the Karnataka CID's probe into a systematic attempt to remove names of 5,994 voters from electoral rolls by forging Form 7 in the Aland Assembly constituency in Kalaburagi district, the Election Commission has delayed the sharing of crucial data required to catch the culprit. As a result, the probe has gone cold. EC admitted that such attempts were made in 2023, but without any success, and ECI itself had reported the matter to the police authority. Rahul Gandhi alleged that the Karnataka CID has written to the ECI 18 times in the last 18 months, but the apex poll body did not share any data on this.Rahul Gandhi had also alleged that the attempt to delete voters from the voter list was systematically carried out across countries using automated software. He used examples from Karnataka's Aland and Maharashtra's Rajouri constituencies. Rahul Gandhi has also claimed that they are receiving insider information from the ECI, and it won't stop.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: &nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/complete-list-prime-minister-modi-s-international-travel-1758020879275">Prime Minister Modi’s international travel: Complete list of Prime Ministerial visits abroad</a>&nbsp;“Gyanesh Kumar ji, do your job, and you have taken an oath…Give the details to the Karnataka CID. We will demonstrate the Hydrogen bomb…I told my team that I won’t go up that stage unless we have 100% proof," warned Mr Gandhi.&nbsp;<h2>Controversial appointment of Gyanesh Kumar</h2>CEC Gyanesh Kumar has a past marred by controversy. His hasty, midnight appointment and removal of the Chief Justice of India from the selection committee by introducing changes in the Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, was widely criticised. The law allowed a Union Minister in the selection committee by giving control to the ruling party. Notably, Gyanesh Kumar, a 1998 batch IAS, had his last role as Secretary, Ministry of Cooperation, under Amit Shah.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-s-vote-chori-claim-voter-roll-irregularities-and-eci-s-data-secrecy-1754754335814">Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ claim strengthened by independent findings of voter roll irregularities, ECI criticised for data secrecy</a>&nbsp;

The Election Commission has dismissed Rahul Gandhi’s charge that CEC Gyanesh Kumar is shielding those behind voter deletion schemes. Rahul cited Karnataka’s Aland case, where the CID sought data on forged voter deletions, but the EC admitted only failed attempts were made in 2023

The Election Commission of India on Thursday denied Rahul Gandhi's allegation that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is shielding people who are involved in voter deletion schemes. In response to Rahul Gandhi, the Election Commission asserted, "Allegations made by Shri Rahul Gandhi are incorrect and baseless. No deletion of any vote can be done online by any member of the public, as misconceived by Shri Rahul Gandhi.” Also Read: PM Modi at 75: 10 major policy decisions that defined his decade in power According to a report by The Hindu on the Karnataka CID's probe into a systematic attempt to remove names of 5,994 voters from electoral rolls by forging Form 7 in the Aland Assembly constituency in Kalaburagi district, the Election Commission has delayed the sharing of crucial data required to catch the culprit. As a result, the probe has gone cold. EC admitted that such attempts were made in 2023, but without any success, and ECI itself had reported the matter to the police authority. Rahul Gandhi alleged that the Karnataka CID has written to the ECI 18 times in the last 18 months, but the apex poll body did not share any data on this. Rahul Gandhi had also alleged that the attempt to delete voters from the voter list was systematically carried out across countries using automated software. He used examples from Karnataka's Aland and Maharashtra's Rajouri constituencies. Rahul Gandhi has also claimed that they are receiving insider information from the ECI, and it won't stop. Also Read: Prime Minister Modi’s international travel: Complete list of Prime Ministerial visits abroad “Gyanesh Kumar ji, do your job, and you have taken an oath…Give the details to the Karnataka CID. We will demonstrate the Hydrogen bomb…I told my team that I won’t go up that stage unless we have 100% proof," warned Mr Gandhi. Controversial appointment of Gyanesh Kumar CEC Gyanesh Kumar has a past marred by controversy. His hasty, midnight appointment and removal of the Chief Justice of India from the selection committee by introducing changes in the Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, was widely criticised. The law allowed a Union Minister in the selection committee by giving control to the ruling party. Notably, Gyanesh Kumar, a 1998 batch IAS, had his last role as Secretary, Ministry of Cooperation, under Amit Shah. Also Read: Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ claim strengthened by independent findings of voter roll irregularities, ECI criticised for data secrecy

The Election Commission has dismissed Rahul Gandhi’s charge that CEC Gyanesh Kumar is shielding those behind voter deletion schemes. Rahul cited Karnataka’s Aland case, where the CID sought data on forged voter deletions, but the EC admitted only failed attempts were made in 2023

EC denies Rahul Gandhi's allegation on CEC Gyanesh Kumar as “incorrect and baseless”

The Election Commission of India (EC) on Sunday pushed back against demands for polling booth CCTV footage, saying sharing it would breach voter privacy. The comments came after Rahul Gandhi accused the Commission of turning a blind eye to what he called “vote chori (theft)”. Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar took a tough stance at a press conference in Delhi, calling the Opposition’s remarks an “insult of the Constitution”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-vote-theft-allegations-insult-of-the-constitution-cec-refutes-oppn-s-charge-of-bias-in-bihar-s-sir-1755423718094">‘Vote theft allegations an insult, few leaders misleading voters:’ CEC refutes Oppn’s charge of bias</a><h2>CEC hits back at Rahul Gandhi’s allegations</h2>Without naming the Congress MP directly, the CEC said, “The ‘chori’ charges are shots being fired at the voters by perching a gun on the EC’s shoulder.” He added, “We want to make it clear, that the EC has fearlessly stood by voters from across sections and religions, and will continue to stand by them like a rock.”<h2>Why machine-readable voter lists were not shared</h2>On the demand for machine-readable voter rolls, the CEC pointed to a 2019 Supreme Court ruling. “The Supreme Court has already held that it could breach a voter’s privacy,” he said. The Commission also cited instances where photos of voters were used in the media without their consent. Kumar warned that such actions put individuals’ rights at risk.<h2>The row over CCTV footage at polling booths</h2>Responding to the push for surveillance footage, Kumar said, “Should the Election Commission share CCTV videos of anyone’s mother, daughter-in-law, sister, or of anyone else?” He argued that with nearly 1.3 crore officials and agents monitoring elections, the process is already transparent. “In such a transparent process, can anyone steal votes?” he asked. The EC said it had seen no proof to back allegations of proxy or duplicate voting.<h2>Rahul Gandhi doubles down in Bihar</h2>Even as the EC briefed the press, Rahul Gandhi addressed a rally in Bihar, accusing the Commission of shielding irregularities during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls. “The entire country knows what the Election Commission is doing,” he told supporters in Sasaram. “Earlier, the country did not know how votes were being stolen. But we made it clear in the press conference how votes are being stolen. Whenever the theft is happening… we will catch the theft and show the people,” he added.The Commission had earlier asked Gandhi to provide proof under oath. At Sunday’s briefing, Kumar declared, “If within seven days I don’t get the oath, it means he is a liar and he blamed my voters as liars.” He also said false accusations “can scare neither the EC nor any voter”.

The Election Commission rejected demands for CCTV footage, citing voter privacy, and called Rahul Gandhi's vote theft claims an insult to the Constitution, defending its impartiality and commitment to voters.

The Election Commission of India (EC) on Sunday pushed back against demands for polling booth CCTV footage, saying sharing it would breach voter privacy. The comments came after Rahul Gandhi accused the Commission of turning a blind eye to what he called “vote chori (theft)”. Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar took a tough stance at a press conference in Delhi, calling the Opposition’s remarks an “insult of the Constitution”. Also read: ‘Vote theft allegations an insult, few leaders misleading voters:’ CEC refutes Oppn’s charge of bias CEC hits back at Rahul Gandhi’s allegations Without naming the Congress MP directly, the CEC said, “The ‘chori’ charges are shots being fired at the voters by perching a gun on the EC’s shoulder.” He added, “We want to make it clear, that the EC has fearlessly stood by voters from across sections and religions, and will continue to stand by them like a rock.” Why machine-readable voter lists were not shared On the demand for machine-readable voter rolls, the CEC pointed to a 2019 Supreme Court ruling. “The Supreme Court has already held that it could breach a voter’s privacy,” he said. The Commission also cited instances where photos of voters were used in the media without their consent. Kumar warned that such actions put individuals’ rights at risk. The row over CCTV footage at polling booths Responding to the push for surveillance footage, Kumar said, “Should the Election Commission share CCTV videos of anyone’s mother, daughter-in-law, sister, or of anyone else?” He argued that with nearly 1.3 crore officials and agents monitoring elections, the process is already transparent. “In such a transparent process, can anyone steal votes?” he asked. The EC said it had seen no proof to back allegations of proxy or duplicate voting. Rahul Gandhi doubles down in Bihar Even as the EC briefed the press, Rahul Gandhi addressed a rally in Bihar, accusing the Commission of shielding irregularities during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls. “The entire country knows what the Election Commission is doing,” he told supporters in Sasaram. “Earlier, the country did not know how votes were being stolen. But we made it clear in the press conference how votes are being stolen. Whenever the theft is happening… we will catch the theft and show the people,” he added. The Commission had earlier asked Gandhi to provide proof under oath. At Sunday’s briefing, Kumar declared, “If within seven days I don’t get the oath, it means he is a liar and he blamed my voters as liars.” He also said false accusations “can scare neither the EC nor any voter”.

The Election Commission rejected demands for CCTV footage, citing voter privacy, and called Rahul Gandhi's vote theft claims an insult to the Constitution, defending its impartiality and commitment to voters.

‘Should we share videos of mothers, sisters?’: Here's why EC is refusing to share CCTV footage amid Rahul Gandhi’s ‘vote chori’ charge

The Election Commission of India holds a live press conference on the Bihar voter list controversy amid heated debates over Aadhaar and citizenship

Voter fraud row: CEC Gyanesh Kumar addresses press conference 

The selection committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi appointed Gyanesh Kumar as the new Chief Election Commissioner of India. Gyanesh Kumar will be replacing incumbent CEC Rajiv Kumar who will be retiring from his services on February 18.

Gyanesh Kumar appointed as India's new chief election commissioner

Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Monday (Feb 17) was appointed as India&rsquo;s new Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). He succeeds CEC Rajiv Kumar, who will be demitting from office on Tuesday (Feb 18).
A notification issued by the Indian Ministry of Law and Justice announced that President Droupadi Murmu was pleased to appoint Gyanesh Kumar, Election Commissioner, as Chief Election Commissioner in the Election Commission of India, with effect from February 19, 2025.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/gyanesh-kumar-appointed-indias-new-chief-election-commissioner-as-rajiv-kumars-tenure-ends-8730551">Gyanesh Kumar appointed India&rsquo;s new Chief Election Commissioner as Rajiv Kumar&rsquo;s tenure ends</a>
He is the first CEC to be appointed under the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, a new law on the appointment of the members of the Election Commission (EC).
<h2>Who is Gyanesh Kumar?</h2>
Incoming CEC Gyanesh Kumar is a retired IAS officer from the 1988-batch Kerala cadre. He will serve as India&rsquo;s Chief Election Commissioner starting Wednesday (Feb 19)
During his tenure as the 26th CEC, he will oversee assembly polls in Bihar later this year. And in 2026, he will oversee assembly elections in Kerala, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/tesla-posts-13-job-openings-in-india-after-ceo-elon-musks-meeting-with-pm-modi-8730853">Tesla posts 13 job openings in India after CEO Elon Musk's meeting with PM Modi</a>
<h2>Education and career</h2>
Gyanesh Kumar studied B. Tech in Civil Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kanpur, Business Finance in ICFAI, India and Environmental Economics at HIID, Harvard University, US.
As per news agency ANI, he has worked in various capacities of the Kerala government. He worked as the assistant collector of Ernakulam, sub-collector of Adoor, managing director of the Kerala State Development Corporation for SC/ST, and municipal commissioner of the Corporation of Cochin, besides holding other posts.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-elections-2024-indian-pm-led-panel-selects-two-poll-commissioners-699987">India polls 2024: Gyanesh Kumar, Sukhbir Sandhu appointed new election commissioners</a>
As a secretary to the government of Kerala, he handled diverse departments, such as finance resources, fast-track projects and the public works department.
In the government of India, he has rich experience working as the joint secretary in the Ministry of Defence. He has also worked as joint secretary and additional secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs, secretary in the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs and secretary in the Ministry of Cooperation. He retired after superannuating on January 31, 2024.

India News | Learn about Gyanesh Kumar's background as a retired IAS officer, his educational achievements from IIT Kanpur and Harvard, and his government service experience.

Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Monday (Feb 17) was appointed as India’s new Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). He succeeds CEC Rajiv Kumar, who will be demitting from office on Tuesday (Feb 18). A notification issued by the Indian Ministry of Law and Justice announced that President Droupadi Murmu was pleased to appoint Gyanesh Kumar, Election Commissioner, as Chief Election Commissioner in the Election Commission of India, with effect from February 19, 2025. Also read | Gyanesh Kumar appointed India’s new Chief Election Commissioner as Rajiv Kumar’s tenure ends He is the first CEC to be appointed under the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, a new law on the appointment of the members of the Election Commission (EC). Who is Gyanesh Kumar? Incoming CEC Gyanesh Kumar is a retired IAS officer from the 1988-batch Kerala cadre. He will serve as India’s Chief Election Commissioner starting Wednesday (Feb 19) During his tenure as the 26th CEC, he will oversee assembly polls in Bihar later this year. And in 2026, he will oversee assembly elections in Kerala, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal. Also read | Tesla posts 13 job openings in India after CEO Elon Musk's meeting with PM Modi Education and career Gyanesh Kumar studied B. Tech in Civil Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kanpur, Business Finance in ICFAI, India and Environmental Economics at HIID, Harvard University, US. As per news agency ANI, he has worked in various capacities of the Kerala government. He worked as the assistant collector of Ernakulam, sub-collector of Adoor, managing director of the Kerala State Development Corporation for SC/ST, and municipal commissioner of the Corporation of Cochin, besides holding other posts. Also read | India polls 2024: Gyanesh Kumar, Sukhbir Sandhu appointed new election commissioners As a secretary to the government of Kerala, he handled diverse departments, such as finance resources, fast-track projects and the public works department. In the government of India, he has rich experience working as the joint secretary in the Ministry of Defence. He has also worked as joint secretary and additional secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs, secretary in the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs and secretary in the Ministry of Cooperation. He retired after superannuating on January 31, 2024.

Who is Gyanesh Kumar, India's newly appointed Chief Election Commissioner?

India: Gyanesh Kumar appointed as Chief Election Commissioner

Retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu on Thursday (Mar 14) were named as the new Election Commissioners by a high-level committee led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.&nbsp;

The two positions in the commission were vacant after the retirement of Anup Chandra Pandey on February 14 and the sudden resignation of Arun Goel on March 8. Goel would have become chief election commissioner (CEC) after incumbent Rajiv Kumar retires&nbsp;in February next year.&nbsp;

In an official statement, the Ministry of Law and Justice said: "In exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023 (Act No. 49 of 2023), the President is pleased to appoint Gyanesh Kumar, IAS (Retd.) and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu, IAS (Retd.), as Election Commissioners in the Election Commission of India, with effect from the date they assume charge of their office."&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-is-sukhbir-singh-sandhu-indias-new-election-commissioner-700174">Who is Sukhbir Singh Sandhu, India's new election commissioner</a>&nbsp;

<h2>Who is Gyanesh Kumar?&nbsp;</h2>

Gyanesh Kumar is an IIT-Kanpur graduate and did&nbsp;BTech in Civil Engineering. He also has a postgraduate degree in economics from Harvard University.&nbsp;

He retired as secretary of the Ministry of Cooperation on January 31, 2024. He also served as the Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs and oversaw the abrogation of Article 370 during his tenure in the home ministry.&nbsp;

He is a 1988-batch IAS officer from the Kerala cadre. As the resident commissioner of Kerala in Delhi, he was deputed by the state government to evacuate 46 nurses stuck in Erbil in war-torn Iraq in 2014.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-elections-2024-indian-pm-led-panel-selects-two-poll-commissioners-699987">Gyanesh Kumar, Sukhbir Sandhu appointed India's new election commissioners</a>&nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;'One Nation, One Election' Explained; What is it and How it will work&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/one-nation-one-election-explained-what-is-it-and-how-it-will-work-700187/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Now he has been appointed as the Election Commissioner. Rajya Sabha on December 12 passed a bill to regulate the appointment and service terms of Chief Election Commissioners and election commissioners. The bill replaces the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991.&nbsp;

The first task before the new election commissioner will be to ensure the successful conduct of the Lok Sabha polls which are slated to be held in April-May this year.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

Retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu on Thursday (Mar 14) were named as the new Election Commissioners by a high-level committee led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu on Thursday (Mar 14) were named as the new Election Commissioners by a high-level committee led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The two positions in the commission were vacant after the retirement of Anup Chandra Pandey on February 14 and the sudden resignation of Arun Goel on March 8. Goel would have become chief election commissioner (CEC) after incumbent Rajiv Kumar retires in February next year. In an official statement, the Ministry of Law and Justice said: "In exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023 (Act No. 49 of 2023), the President is pleased to appoint Gyanesh Kumar, IAS (Retd.) and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu, IAS (Retd.), as Election Commissioners in the Election Commission of India, with effect from the date they assume charge of their office." Also read: Who is Sukhbir Singh Sandhu, India's new election commissioner Who is Gyanesh Kumar? Gyanesh Kumar is an IIT-Kanpur graduate and did BTech in Civil Engineering. He also has a postgraduate degree in economics from Harvard University. He retired as secretary of the Ministry of Cooperation on January 31, 2024. He also served as the Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs and oversaw the abrogation of Article 370 during his tenure in the home ministry. He is a 1988-batch IAS officer from the Kerala cadre. As the resident commissioner of Kerala in Delhi, he was deputed by the state government to evacuate 46 nurses stuck in Erbil in war-torn Iraq in 2014. Also read: Gyanesh Kumar, Sukhbir Sandhu appointed India's new election commissioners Watch: 'One Nation, One Election' Explained; What is it and How it will work × Now he has been appointed as the Election Commissioner. Rajya Sabha on December 12 passed a bill to regulate the appointment and service terms of Chief Election Commissioners and election commissioners. The bill replaces the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991. The first task before the new election commissioner will be to ensure the successful conduct of the Lok Sabha polls which are slated to be held in April-May this year. (With inputs from agencies)

Meet Gyanesh Kumar, the new Election Commissioner of India. He oversaw abrogation of Article 370

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led selection committee has finalized the names of two new election Commissioners weeks ahead of the general elections in the country. Leader of opposition Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury who was part of the three-member committee containing one more cabinet minister has revealed the names of the selected poll officials after the meeting that ended minutes ago. Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury said Sukhbir Sandhu and Gyanesh Kumar have been elected as the new election Commissioners.

New Election Commissioners selected, Gyanesh Kumar & Sukhbir Sandhu to be new ECs

gyanesh-kumar

Gyanesh Kumar, News on Gyanesh Kumar, stories on Gyanesh Kumar, articles on Gyanesh Kumar, Gyanesh Kumar stories at Wion, Gyanesh Kumar news, Gyanesh Kumar latest news

gyanesh kumar

SC defers pleas against CEC Gyanesh Kumar by 10 days, petitioners get time to respond to ECI

Election Commissioners raised complaint against senior officer, reveals RTI

Mumbai: CJP brings Tricolour protest to Azad Maidan

SC issues notice to ECI, CEC Gyanesh Kumar on Rahul Gandhi, INDIA bloc plea

Rahul Gandhi's plea against EC delayed as Supreme Court flags 14 ‘defects’

High-voltage political drama in New Delhi as opposition leaders march to apex court

Delhi protests: LoP Rahul Gandhi demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation

Delhi protest: 'Court should not be dragged into politics', says CJI Surya Kant

Opposition to march to Supreme Court Monday over ‘vote chori', removal of CEC

Delhi on alert: Internet suspended, train cancellations ahead of CJP protest

SC refuses ex parte order against CEC, seeks response from Election Commission

Kerala reopens 2006 vigilance probe into engineer's suicide note naming CEC

EC rolls back SIR add-on in Form 6 that was objected by two commissioners: What this means

Petition in Supreme Court seeks suspension of CEC Gyanesh Kumar

SIR row: ECI clarifies dissent claims, says decisions approved unanimously

Gyanesh Kumar: Who is the CEC at centre of ECI rift over voter rolls?

Cockroach Janta Party gives Gyanesh Kumar 48 hours to resign

ECI rift? Two commissioners quietly fought the CEC Gyanesh Kumar for 10 months

193 opposition MPs sign notice seeking removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar

Bihar assembly poll 2025: Police to patrol on horses, boats? Here's what we know

EC denies Rahul Gandhi's allegation on CEC Gyanesh Kumar as 'incorrect'

Why EC is refusing to share CCTV footage amid Rahul Gandhi’s ‘vote chori’ charge

Voter fraud row: CEC Gyanesh Kumar addresses press conference

Gyanesh Kumar appointed as India's new chief election commissioner