The Jeffrey Epstein files saga took an interesting turn on Tuesday (Nov 18) with the GOP-led Freedom Caucus trying to censure Democratic Rep Stacey Plaskett over her links, past interactions with the disgraced financier. The motion failed by a single vote, 213 to 214, but it landed only hours after the House voted unanimously to force the full release of the long-withheld Epstein records. So, who is Stacey Plaskett, and how is she linked to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein? Here's all you need to know.<h2>Who is Stacey Plaskett?</h2>Plaskett represents the US Virgin Islands as a non-voting delegate. That territory includes Little St James, the private island Epstein owned and used for years before his 2019 arrest. Because of that, she dealt with Epstein’s presence in the territory long before his crimes became global news.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/gavin-newson-flips-quiet-piggy-insult-on-trump-trolls-potus-with-humiliating-pictures-check-them-out-here-1763526258448">Gavin Newson flips 'quiet, piggy' insult on Trump, trolls POTUS with humiliating pictures. Check them out HERE</a><h2>Why did the GOP try to censure her?</h2>Republicans, as per reports, seized on newly released emails that appeared to show Plaskett exchanging messages with Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing. The Washington Post reported that the timing of the texts and their content matched what was happening in the hearing room that day. Plaskett’s office did not deny the exchange. Instead, her spokesperson said she was just responding to "partisan vitriol". They said that Plaskett received a flood of messages from staff, constituents, and members of the public while she questioned witnesses, and Epstein's messages were just part of that mix.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-insults-woman-journalist-calls-her-piggy-as-epstein-questions-hit-nerve-watch-viral-video-1763519933553">Trump insults woman journalist, calls her 'piggy' as Epstein questions hit nerve. Watch viral video</a>"During the hearing, Congresswoman Plaskett received texts from staff, constituents and the public at large offering advice, support and in some cases partisan vitriol, including from Epstein," her spokesperson told CNN. They added that as a former prosecutor, she welcomes information that "helps her get at the truth and took on the GOP that was trying to bury the truth".The emails released by the House Oversight Committee show what look like multiple back-and-forth exchanges between Epstein and a contact identified as Plaskett.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark" data-dnt="true" align="center">Plaskett met privately with Epstein at his New York apartment to solicit campaign donations, after he was already a convicted s*x offender. Where is the Democrat outrage?! <a href="https://t.co/EsUFHliwiK">pic.twitter.com/EsUFHliwiK</a>&mdash; Spitfire (@DogRightGirl) <a href="https://twitter.com/DogRightGirl/status/1990840827065540716?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Washington Post reported that the messages were consistent with the corresponding Congressional hearing in 2019. Some of the emails also suggest she visited Epstein’s residence more than once while seeking campaign donations, though those claims remain unverified in the official record.Despite Tuesday’s failed vote, Republicans say they will bring the censure motion back to the floor later this week.

GOP hardliners tried to censure Rep Stacey Plaskett over emails tying her to Jeffrey Epstein, but the motion failed 213 to 214. Who is Stacey Plaskett, and how is she connected to the paedophile?

The Jeffrey Epstein files saga took an interesting turn on Tuesday (Nov 18) with the GOP-led Freedom Caucus trying to censure Democratic Rep Stacey Plaskett over her links, past interactions with the disgraced financier. The motion failed by a single vote, 213 to 214, but it landed only hours after the House voted unanimously to force the full release of the long-withheld Epstein records. So, who is Stacey Plaskett, and how is she linked to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein? Here's all you need to know. Who is Stacey Plaskett? Plaskett represents the US Virgin Islands as a non-voting delegate. That territory includes Little St James, the private island Epstein owned and used for years before his 2019 arrest. Because of that, she dealt with Epstein’s presence in the territory long before his crimes became global news. Also read | Gavin Newson flips 'quiet, piggy' insult on Trump, trolls POTUS with humiliating pictures. Check them out HERE Why did the GOP try to censure her? Republicans, as per reports, seized on newly released emails that appeared to show Plaskett exchanging messages with Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing. The Washington Post reported that the timing of the texts and their content matched what was happening in the hearing room that day. Plaskett’s office did not deny the exchange. Instead, her spokesperson said she was just responding to "partisan vitriol". They said that Plaskett received a flood of messages from staff, constituents, and members of the public while she questioned witnesses, and Epstein's messages were just part of that mix. Also read | Trump insults woman journalist, calls her 'piggy' as Epstein questions hit nerve. Watch viral video "During the hearing, Congresswoman Plaskett received texts from staff, constituents and the public at large offering advice, support and in some cases partisan vitriol, including from Epstein," her spokesperson told CNN. They added that as a former prosecutor, she welcomes information that "helps her get at the truth and took on the GOP that was trying to bury the truth". The emails released by the House Oversight Committee show what look like multiple back-and-forth exchanges between Epstein and a contact identified as Plaskett.

GOP hardliners tried to censure Rep Stacey Plaskett over emails tying her to Jeffrey Epstein, but the motion failed 213 to 214. Who is Stacey Plaskett, and how is she connected to the paedophile?

Who is Stacey Plaskett and why is the GOP trying to censure her over Epstein links?

There’s no confirmed date for the Epstein files’ release, as several hurdles could slow the process. Privacy protections, sensitive law-enforcement details, ongoing investigations, Trump-ordered probes, and potential legal challenges may all delay when — or how much — the public finally sees

There’s no confirmed date for the Epstein files’ release, as several hurdles could slow the process. Privacy protections, sensitive law-enforcement details, ongoing investigations, Trump-ordered probes, and potential legal challenges may all delay when — or how much — the public finally sees

When will Epstein files be released? 5 BIG obstacles that could delay its release

The US Congress has approved the release of Epstein Files. The ball is now in Trump's court. Though the Republican president has hinted that he would sign the bill, he might not. Here's what the US law says about president's power on signing a bill after Congress' approval

The US Congress has approved the release of Epstein Files. The ball is now in Trump's court. Though the Republican president has hinted that he would sign the bill, he might not. Here's what the US law says about president's power on signing a bill after Congress' approval

Can Trump refuse to sign Epstein files bill? Would it still be released without his signature?

Epstein Files: The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act with a bipartisan 427-1 vote, mandating the Justice Department to release over 33,000 pages of files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s prosecution. 

U.S. Congress Votes Overwhelmingly to Release Epstein Files

The US Senate on Tuesday unanimously approved a bipartisan, House-backed bill that would require the Department of Justice to make all “Epstein Files” public, CNN reported. With the Senate’s green light, the measure now heads straight to President Donald Trump, who has already pledged to sign it into law.

US Senate Unanimously Approves Bill To Release All 'Epstein Files' Publicly

In an overwhelming majority, the US Congress voted to force the release of Justice Department files on the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The House of Representatives passed the measure with a vote of 427-1, sending a resolution to the Republican-majority Senate, which swiftly approved it. The bill now heads to Trump's desk for his signature. But the main question remains: When will Trump sign the bill?<h2>When will Trump sign the bill?</h2>Just a day ago, Trump, in a major U-turn, said that &nbsp;he would be willing to sign a bill forcing the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files. The president added that he did not want the focus on Epstein to "detract from the great success" of the Republican party. "I'm all for it," he said as he took reporter questions during an event in the Oval Office. Reuters has quoted an unnamed senior White House official saying that Trump will indeed sign the bill when it reaches his desk. As of now, the White House has not informed the White House Press Pool about the signing event at the Oval Office. This story will be updated when the official announcement from the White House comes.&nbsp;Despite his changed position on the bill, Trump rebuked a reporter as "terrible person" and said the television network the journalist works for should have its license revoked because they keep asking about the Epstein Files. While hosting a visit by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Trump said, "I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert." Reuters reported that the fight over the Epstein papers has taken a toll on Trump's public approval, which fell to its lowest point this year in a poll concluded on Monday<h2>What are the Epstein Files?</h2>The Epstein files are a collection of legal documents, court records, and investigative materials connected to Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier accused of operating a sex trafficking ring involving underage girls. These files have drawn international attention due to Epstein’s links to high-profile figures in politics, business, and entertainment. A major part of the Epstein files comes from court cases, a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most outspoken accusers. In early 2024, hundreds of pages of these court documents were unsealed, revealing names, emails, and testimonies involving powerful individuals, however, large portions remain sealed or redacted. Jeffrey Epstein died under controversial circumstances in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The US Congress overwhelmingly passed a bill forcing the release of unclassified Jeffrey Epstein files, reversing Donald Trump’s earlier opposition. The bill has now headed to Trump's desk. It remains to be seen when will the US president sign it

In an overwhelming majority, the US Congress voted to force the release of Justice Department files on the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The House of Representatives passed the measure with a vote of 427-1, sending a resolution to the Republican-majority Senate, which swiftly approved it. The bill now heads to Trump's desk for his signature. But the main question remains: When will Trump sign the bill? When will Trump sign the bill? Just a day ago, Trump, in a major U-turn, said that he would be willing to sign a bill forcing the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files. The president added that he did not want the focus on Epstein to "detract from the great success" of the Republican party. "I'm all for it," he said as he took reporter questions during an event in the Oval Office. Reuters has quoted an unnamed senior White House official saying that Trump will indeed sign the bill when it reaches his desk. As of now, the White House has not informed the White House Press Pool about the signing event at the Oval Office. This story will be updated when the official announcement from the White House comes. Despite his changed position on the bill, Trump rebuked a reporter as "terrible person" and said the television network the journalist works for should have its license revoked because they keep asking about the Epstein Files. While hosting a visit by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Trump said, "I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert." Reuters reported that the fight over the Epstein papers has taken a toll on Trump's public approval, which fell to its lowest point this year in a poll concluded on Monday What are the Epstein Files? The Epstein files are a collection of legal documents, court records, and investigative materials connected to Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier accused of operating a sex trafficking ring involving underage girls. These files have drawn international attention due to Epstein’s links to high-profile figures in politics, business, and entertainment. A major part of the Epstein files comes from court cases, a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most outspoken accusers. In early 2024, hundreds of pages of these court documents were unsealed, revealing names, emails, and testimonies involving powerful individuals, however, large portions remain sealed or redacted. Jeffrey Epstein died under controversial circumstances in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019.

The US Congress overwhelmingly passed a bill forcing the release of unclassified Jeffrey Epstein files, reversing Donald Trump’s earlier opposition. The bill has now headed to Trump's desk. It remains to be seen when will the US president sign it

When will Trump sign the bill to release Epstein files? Here's what we know

President Donald Trump has expressed full support for the new bill that aims to release the Epstein files. This development comes amid renewed public scrutiny over the Jeffrey Epstein case and calls for accountability. We break down what the bill entails, its potential impact, and the reactions from survivors and the public."

Trump Says He Fully Supports Bill Releasing Epstein Files

The US House voted on Tuesday (Nov 18) to require the Justice Department to release files linked to Jeffrey Epstein, passing the measure with broad bipartisan support. The US House of Representatives has voted 427-1 to compel the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein.&nbsp;“I rise today to acknowledge the survivors, family members and advocates who are here today and have never given up the legislation in front of us, at its core is about something very simple: The survivors deserve justice. The American people deserve the truth,” said Democratic congresswoman Adelita Grijlava.&nbsp;“Protecting women and children from pedophiles should not be a Democratic issue. Should not be a Republican issue. It should be a human rights issue and a matter of justice. I urge my colleagues to vote yes," she added.&nbsp;In a statement after Tuesday’s vote, Congressman Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the House oversight committee, demanded that the Senate majority leader, John Thune, take up the bill “immediately”.&nbsp;“Donald Trump is panicking and trying to stop our investigation. We need to know what he’s hiding, and what powerful men are responsible for the rape and abuse of children and women,” Garcia said. “And let’s be clear – Donald Trump has the power to release the files today. But he chooses to delay and deflect.”&nbsp;He added, “No more lies. No more secrets. We will get justice for the survivors. Release the files, NOW.”&nbsp;This came just hours after US President Donald Trump, during a press conference with Saudi Crown Prince MBS on Tuesday (Nov 18), got furious over questions on the Epstein files. A reporter of ABC News asked the American president why he does not release Jeffrey Epstein's sex offence file rather than waiting for Congress to do it. Trump, in response, called ABC News a fake news organisation and said its licence should be revoked.&nbsp;"I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein," he added.

The US House voted on Tuesday (Nov 18) to require the Justice Department to release files linked to Jeffrey Epstein, passing the measure with broad bipartisan support.


 

The US House voted on Tuesday (Nov 18) to require the Justice Department to release files linked to Jeffrey Epstein, passing the measure with broad bipartisan support. The US House of Representatives has voted 427-1 to compel the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. “I rise today to acknowledge the survivors, family members and advocates who are here today and have never given up the legislation in front of us, at its core is about something very simple: The survivors deserve justice. The American people deserve the truth,” said Democratic congresswoman Adelita Grijlava. “Protecting women and children from pedophiles should not be a Democratic issue. Should not be a Republican issue. It should be a human rights issue and a matter of justice. I urge my colleagues to vote yes," she added. In a statement after Tuesday’s vote, Congressman Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the House oversight committee, demanded that the Senate majority leader, John Thune, take up the bill “immediately”. “Donald Trump is panicking and trying to stop our investigation. We need to know what he’s hiding, and what powerful men are responsible for the rape and abuse of children and women,” Garcia said. “And let’s be clear – Donald Trump has the power to release the files today. But he chooses to delay and deflect.” He added, “No more lies. No more secrets. We will get justice for the survivors. Release the files, NOW.” This came just hours after US President Donald Trump, during a press conference with Saudi Crown Prince MBS on Tuesday (Nov 18), got furious over questions on the Epstein files. A reporter of ABC News asked the American president why he does not release Jeffrey Epstein's sex offence file rather than waiting for Congress to do it. Trump, in response, called ABC News a fake news organisation and said its licence should be revoked. "I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein," he added.

The US House voted on Tuesday (Nov 18) to require the Justice Department to release files linked to Jeffrey Epstein, passing the measure with broad bipartisan support. &nbsp;

‘Donald Trump is panicking’: US House votes to make Epstein files public. Details inside

Donald Trump reverses course on the Jeffrey Epstein files, urging Republicans to support full release while calling Epstein issues a “distraction” from GOP achievements. What’s driving this sudden shift, and what does it mean for Trump and the Republican Party? Watch for a full breakdown.

Trump Backs Epstein File Release, Survivors Demand Justice

Trump Reverses on Epstein Files: GOP Achievements vs Controversy

In a stunning reversal, U.S. President Donald Trump has urged House Republicans to vote in favor of releasing Jeffrey Epstein files, saying “we have nothing to hide.” He also signaled he would sign the bill if it reaches his desk.


US President Trump fully supports bill releasing Epstein files

House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, US President Donald Trump has said in a reversal of earlier stance on the matter.

Trump Pushes House Republicans To Back Epstein Transparency Bill

House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, US President Donald Trump has said in a reversal of earlier stance on the matter.


Trump takes a dig at Democrats, 'its time to move on from hoax'

US President Donald Trump said on Sunday (Nov 16) that House Republicans should vote to release the files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, despite opposing the measure previously. In a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform, the president also slammed Democrats for pushing the “hoax”. This comes after recently released emails written by the disgraced financier suggested that Trump “knew about the girls”, an allegation the Republican denied.Trump wrote on Truth Social, “House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party, including our recent Victory on the Democrat ‘Shutdown’”.The 79-year-old president added that the Department of Justice has already started going through tens of thousands of pages and is looking at “various Democrat operatives”, including Bill Clinton, Reid Hoffman, and Larry Summers, and their relationship with Epstein.“Nobody cared about Jeffrey Epstein when he was alive and, if the Democrats had anything, they would have released it before our Landslide Election Victory,” Trump said.Trump further claimed that all he cares about is that Republicans get “back on point”, focusing on the economy, affordability for Americans, rebuilding the military, securing borders, deporting illegal immigrants, and “stopping transgender for everyone”.“Let’s start talking about the Republican Party’s Record Setting Achievements, and not fall into the Epstein ‘TRAP,’ which is actually a curse on the Democrats, not us. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” he said.In another post, Trump claimed that Democrats “had the sleazy relationships with Epstein, and should be prosecuted!!!”“It’s a Democrat Hoax for purposes of deflection, just like the Russia, Russia, Russia Scam!!!” he said, sharing a post by David Schoen, attorney representing Trump in his second impeachment trial. “If Jeffrey Epstein had any dirt on Donald Trump, he would have had great leverage in the criminal case against him at the time he died. The fact that he unequivocally said he had none ought to shut down the false claims otherwise; but facts are no obstacle to political attacks,” Schoen said, defending Trump.&nbsp;

The 79-year-old president added that the Department of Justice has already started going through tens of thousands of pages and is looking at “various Democrat operatives” and their relationship with Epstein.

US President Donald Trump said on Sunday (Nov 16) that House Republicans should vote to release the files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, despite opposing the measure previously. In a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform, the president also slammed Democrats for pushing the “hoax”. This comes after recently released emails written by the disgraced financier suggested that Trump “knew about the girls”, an allegation the Republican denied. Trump wrote on Truth Social, “House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party, including our recent Victory on the Democrat ‘Shutdown’”. The 79-year-old president added that the Department of Justice has already started going through tens of thousands of pages and is looking at “various Democrat operatives”, including Bill Clinton, Reid Hoffman, and Larry Summers, and their relationship with Epstein. “Nobody cared about Jeffrey Epstein when he was alive and, if the Democrats had anything, they would have released it before our Landslide Election Victory,” Trump said. Trump further claimed that all he cares about is that Republicans get “back on point”, focusing on the economy, affordability for Americans, rebuilding the military, securing borders, deporting illegal immigrants, and “stopping transgender for everyone”. “Let’s start talking about the Republican Party’s Record Setting Achievements, and not fall into the Epstein ‘TRAP,’ which is actually a curse on the Democrats, not us. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” he said. In another post, Trump claimed that Democrats “had the sleazy relationships with Epstein, and should be prosecuted!!!” “It’s a Democrat Hoax for purposes of deflection, just like the Russia, Russia, Russia Scam!!!” he said, sharing a post by David Schoen, attorney representing Trump in his second impeachment trial. “If Jeffrey Epstein had any dirt on Donald Trump, he would have had great leverage in the criminal case against him at the time he died. The fact that he unequivocally said he had none ought to shut down the false claims otherwise; but facts are no obstacle to political attacks,” Schoen said, defending Trump.

The 79-year-old president added that the Department of Justice has already started going through tens of thousands of pages and is looking at “various Democrat operatives” and their relationship with Epstein.

‘We have nothing to hide’: Trump takes a U-turn, backs release of Epstein files

President Donald Trump announced Friday he is officially rescinding his endorsement of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and attacked her in personal terms, while the congresswoman countered that Trump was trying to make an example of her to prevent the release of files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.


Trump calls Greene 'wacky' & a 'traitor'

Trump withdraws support for Marjorie Taylor Greene

Amid fresh waves of speculation after Jaffery Epstein's old emails claimed that the US President Donald Trump was aware of the sexual offences happening, US VP JD Vance's old internet post is being circulated online. Vince's old post is resurfacing in which he said , “What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein’s clients secret? Oh…” The post was made in December 2021.&nbsp;He added, “If you’re a journalist and you’re not asking questions about this case you should be ashamed of yourself. What purpose do you even serve? I’m sure there’s a middle class teenager somewhere who could use some harassing right now but maybe try to do your job once in a while.”&nbsp;Sharing Vance’s old post, Rep. Ro Khanna wrote on November 13, “We’re about to find out.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/military-rule-2-0-pakistan-enacts-27th-amendment-army-chief-gains-lifelong-immunity-and-expanded-powers-shahbaz-sharif-nawaz-sharif-asim-munir-1762955753702">Military Rule 2.0: Pak Army Chief gains lifelong immunity and expanded powers</a>&nbsp;The alleged sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, claimed in several private emails that US President Donald Trump was aware of his act and "Spent hours" at his house. Epstein claimed that the then-friend of his "knew about the girls". The emails released by the House Democrats on Wednesday (Nov 12) showed that the alleged sex offender claimed Trump spent time with one of his victims. Trump has always denied any involvement in the case, saying he and Epstein were once on friendly terms but later parted ways. However, the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee said the emails, selected from thousands of pages of documents received by their panel, told a different story.&nbsp;“These latest emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the president,” Representative Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said in a statement.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Epstein claimed that the then-friend of his knew about the girls. The emails released by the House Democrats on Wednesday (Nov 12) showed that the alleged sex offender claimed Trump spent time with one of his victims.

Amid fresh waves of speculation after Jaffery Epstein's old emails claimed that the US President Donald Trump was aware of the sexual offences happening, US VP JD Vance's old internet post is being circulated online. Vince's old post is resurfacing in which he said , “What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein’s clients secret? Oh…” The post was made in December 2021. He added, “If you’re a journalist and you’re not asking questions about this case you should be ashamed of yourself. What purpose do you even serve? I’m sure there’s a middle class teenager somewhere who could use some harassing right now but maybe try to do your job once in a while.” Sharing Vance’s old post, Rep. Ro Khanna wrote on November 13, “We’re about to find out.” Also read: Military Rule 2.0: Pak Army Chief gains lifelong immunity and expanded powers The alleged sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, claimed in several private emails that US President Donald Trump was aware of his act and "Spent hours" at his house. Epstein claimed that the then-friend of his "knew about the girls". The emails released by the House Democrats on Wednesday (Nov 12) showed that the alleged sex offender claimed Trump spent time with one of his victims. Trump has always denied any involvement in the case, saying he and Epstein were once on friendly terms but later parted ways. However, the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee said the emails, selected from thousands of pages of documents received by their panel, told a different story. “These latest emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the president,” Representative Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said in a statement.

&nbsp;Epstein claimed that the then-friend of his "knew about the girls". The emails released by the House Democrats on Wednesday (Nov 12) showed that the alleged sex offender claimed Trump spent time with one of his victims.

Epstein Files: As Epstein’s old emails, mentioning Trump, escalate controversy, JD Vance’s old post resurfaces

Newly surfaced Epstein files have placed Imran Khan under fresh scrutiny over his past association with Ghislaine Maxwell. Investigators are reviewing old interactions and photographs now linked to the convicted sex offender’s network.

Epstein's Hostile Reaction To Imran Khan's Election, Calls Him 'Really Bad News'

Newly surfaced Epstein files have placed Imran Khan under fresh scrutiny over his past association with Ghislaine Maxwell. Investigators are reviewing old interactions and photographs now linked to the convicted sex offender’s network.


Epstein files: Epstein calls Imran Khan greater than Erdogan, Putin, Xi

Epstein files: Imran Khan's association with Ghislaine Maxwell under scanner 

Thousands of pages of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails have now been released by the US House Oversight Committee, offering the clearest glimpse yet into his wide circle of correspondents.

Thousands of pages of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails have now been released by the US House Oversight Committee, offering the clearest glimpse yet into his wide circle of correspondents.

From Tom Barrack and David Blaine to Michael Wolff: 8 key names in the new Epstein email release

Epstein Emails: House Democrats have released thousands of pages of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails, including messages where Epstein wrote that President Trump “spent hours” with one of Epstein’s victims. These newly disclosed communications suggest that Epstein believed Trump knew more about the abuse allegations than he has publicly acknowledged. 

New Epstein Emails Spark Trump Counter-Attack, Trump Seeks Probe Into Bill Clinton

US President Donald Trump has withdrawn his endorsement and support from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and launched a personal attack on her, labelling her a 'ranting lunatic'. While Greene maintains that she has been a scapegoat for demanding justice for Epstein victims and demanding the release of files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.&nbsp;“She has told many people that she is upset that I don’t return her phone calls anymore, but with 219 Congressmen/women, 53 U.S. Senators, 24 Cabinet Members, almost 200 Countries, and an otherwise normal life to lead, I can’t take a ranting Lunatic’s call every day,” wrote Trump in a Truth Social Post.Marjorie had been cornering Trump for some time over various issues, and since last week, Trump has decided to respond. This marks a remarkable rift within the Republicans, where two former allies are at loggerheads.&nbsp;

Marjorie denied calling Trump and said that it's the Epstein files that have sent Trump over the edge. In a post on social platform X, Greene expressed her anguish about how far Trump is going to stop the release of the Epstein files. She also had been critical of Trump's overemphasis on foreign policies, and attacked Trump on domestic policies like health insurance premiums and problems that are hurting the vulnerable section of the population.Greene said that she stood by Donald Trump when everyone was against him and spent her own money and energy. But she will speak up when Trump is wrong, because “I don’t worship or serve Donald Trump”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">President Trump just attacked me and lied about me. I haven’t called him at all, but I did send these text messages today. Apparently this is what sent him over the edge. The Epstein files. And of course he’s coming after me hard to make an example to scare all the other… <a href="https://t.co/EcUzaohZZs">pic.twitter.com/EcUzaohZZs</a>&mdash; Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1989518703507963940?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 15, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

During the visit of Syrian President Ahmad al-Shara to the White House, &nbsp;Trump said, “I don’t know what happened to Marjorie, nice woman. She’s lost her way, I think.” Trump accused her of drifting off to the “other side”. He defended his global focus as necessary, saying he must "view the presidency as a worldwide situation, not locally," because “we could have a world that’s on fire, where wars come to our shores very easily, if you had a bad president.”&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump withdraws support from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, calling her a “ranting lunatic” over Epstein files demands. Greene responds, defending her stance on justice for Epstein victims and criticising Trump’s domestic policies.

US President Donald Trump has withdrawn his endorsement and support from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and launched a personal attack on her, labelling her a 'ranting lunatic'. While Greene maintains that she has been a scapegoat for demanding justice for Epstein victims and demanding the release of files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. “She has told many people that she is upset that I don’t return her phone calls anymore, but with 219 Congressmen/women, 53 U.S. Senators, 24 Cabinet Members, almost 200 Countries, and an otherwise normal life to lead, I can’t take a ranting Lunatic’s call every day,” wrote Trump in a Truth Social Post. Marjorie had been cornering Trump for some time over various issues, and since last week, Trump has decided to respond. This marks a remarkable rift within the Republicans, where two former allies are at loggerheads.

US President Donald Trump withdraws support from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, calling her a “ranting lunatic” over Epstein files demands. Greene responds, defending her stance on justice for Epstein victims and criticising Trump’s domestic policies.

'Ranting lunatic': Trump withdraws support from Marjorie Taylor Greene as Republican rift widens

Epstein Emails: House Democrats have released thousands of pages of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails, including messages where Epstein wrote that President Trump “spent hours” with one of Epstein’s victims. These newly disclosed communications suggest that Epstein believed Trump knew more about the abuse allegations than he has publicly acknowledged. 


Epstein files: Epstein claimed Trump 'knew of the girls' in one email 

House Democrats have released new emails from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein that mention former President Donald Trump. The emails raise renewed questions about Trump’s past interactions with Epstein, though the White House has called the release a “political smear.” The documents are part of an ongoing debate over transparency and the public’s right to information regarding high-profile figures linked to Epstein.


New Epstein Emails that Mention Trump Released by House Democrats 

US President Donald Trump said Sunday he felt "badly" for the UK royal family after King Charles III revoked his brother Andrew's title of prince over his scandalous ties to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. "I feel very badly. I mean, it's a terrible thing that's happened to the family," Trump said when asked by an AFP reporter aboard Air Force One about the recent saga. “That's been a tragic situation, and it's too bad. I mean, I feel badly for the family.”&nbsp;Trump, 79, has faced his own political woes in recent months over his own alleged relationship with Epstein, the New York financier and who died in prison in 2019.Trump's comments came&nbsp;as the British government said it would move to strip the former prince, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, of his honorary title of vice-admiral, his last remaining military rank.&nbsp;The US president has frequently expressed admiration for Britain's royal family, most recently when Charles hosted him for a lavish state visit in September.Trump received a full state dinner at Windsor Castle, military parades and a flyover during the visit.But the so-called Epstein files have been the focal point of a controversy engulfing the second presidency of Trump, who was a longtime friend of Epstein.In July, the Trump administration announced that it had discovered no new evidence justifying the release of additional documents or the opening of a new investigation into the matter. Epstein died while awaiting trial for alleged sex trafficking of underage girls recruited to provide him with sexual massages.&nbsp;Authorities ruled his death a suicide, but it has fueled countless conspiracy theories among Trump's voter base that he was murdered to prevent him from implicating high-profile figures. Republican Trump has repeatedly denied any involvement with the Epstein affair, dismissing it as a "hoax" by rival Democrats. Former prince Andrew's ties to Epstein have sparked growing anger in Britain.&nbsp;Charles on Thursday removed all his younger brother's remaining royal titles and honours and ousted him from his long-term residence on the Windsor estate.Defence minister John Healey told the BBC on Sunday that "guided again by the king, we are working now to remove that last remaining title of vice-admiral that he has."Andrew was stripped of his other honorary military titles by his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, in 2022 after he was sued by Virginia Giuffre, Epstein's main accuser.The king's younger brother was once feted for his role as a Royal Navy helicopter pilot in the 1982 Falklands War. He retired in 2001 after 22 years of service. Andrew has always denied that he sexually abused Giuffre, who said in her posthumous memoir published in October that she was trafficked to have sex with him on three occasions, twice when she was just 17.

US President Donald Trump said Sunday he felt "badly" for the UK royal family after King Charles III revoked his brother Andrew's title of prince over his scandalous ties to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 

US President Donald Trump said Sunday he felt "badly" for the UK royal family after King Charles III revoked his brother Andrew's title of prince over his scandalous ties to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. "I feel very badly. I mean, it's a terrible thing that's happened to the family," Trump said when asked by an AFP reporter aboard Air Force One about the recent saga. “That's been a tragic situation, and it's too bad. I mean, I feel badly for the family.” Trump, 79, has faced his own political woes in recent months over his own alleged relationship with Epstein, the New York financier and who died in prison in 2019. Trump's comments came as the British government said it would move to strip the former prince, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, of his honorary title of vice-admiral, his last remaining military rank. The US president has frequently expressed admiration for Britain's royal family, most recently when Charles hosted him for a lavish state visit in September. Trump received a full state dinner at Windsor Castle, military parades and a flyover during the visit. But the so-called Epstein files have been the focal point of a controversy engulfing the second presidency of Trump, who was a longtime friend of Epstein. In July, the Trump administration announced that it had discovered no new evidence justifying the release of additional documents or the opening of a new investigation into the matter. Epstein died while awaiting trial for alleged sex trafficking of underage girls recruited to provide him with sexual massages. Authorities ruled his death a suicide, but it has fueled countless conspiracy theories among Trump's voter base that he was murdered to prevent him from implicating high-profile figures. Republican Trump has repeatedly denied any involvement with the Epstein affair, dismissing it as a "hoax" by rival Democrats. Former prince Andrew's ties to Epstein have sparked growing anger in Britain. Charles on Thursday removed all his younger brother's remaining royal titles and honours and ousted him from his long-term residence on the Windsor estate. Defence minister John Healey told the BBC on Sunday that "guided again by the king, we are working now to remove that last remaining title of vice-admiral that he has." Andrew was stripped of his other honorary military titles by his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, in 2022 after he was sued by Virginia Giuffre, Epstein's main accuser. The king's younger brother was once feted for his role as a Royal Navy helicopter pilot in the 1982 Falklands War. He retired in 2001 after 22 years of service. Andrew has always denied that he sexually abused Giuffre, who said in her posthumous memoir published in October that she was trafficked to have sex with him on three occasions, twice when she was just 17.

US President Donald Trump said Sunday he felt "badly" for the UK royal family after King Charles III revoked his brother Andrew's title of prince over his scandalous ties to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.&nbsp;

'I feel very badly': Trump says UK royals suffered 'terrible thing' after Andrew stripped of titles over Epstein scandal

Epstein Files: Continuing his tirade against media outlets suggesting that he visited convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's private island in 2014, Elon Musk tweeted, "Anyone pushing this false narrative deserves complete contempt."


Epstein files: New files say itinerary suggests Musk's trip to Epstein's Virgin Island in 2014

The newly released documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate suggest that the convicted sex offender was also in contact with influential figures, including Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Steve Bannon. The documents provided by Jeffrey Epstein’s estate to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and partially released by its Democratic members, include daily schedules, flight logs, financial ledgers, and phone message records spanning nearly three decades. The latest batch contains 8,544 documents in total. The House Committee is investigating the convicted sex offender and his ties to a wide network of powerful political figures.


Epstein files: Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Steve Bannon among names in new documents

Prince Andrew could be "destroyed" by more than 100 secret emails contained in the so-called Epstein Files, The Mail on Sunday has reported. According to the report, the cache of emails includes "incriminating" correspondence between the Duke of York and paedophile, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The documents are among hundreds of thousands being reviewed by the US Congress before their expected release. Citing a source, the publication reports that the emails were “embarrassing and incriminating, and he (Prince Andrew) could be destroyed.” Here's all we know about the Prince Andrew-Jeffrey Epstein emails.<h2>Forget Peter Mandelson, Andrew would face worse</h2>Speaking to the publication, one person in the know predicted that Prince Andrew would face a worse fallout than Peter Mandelson. Lord Mandelson was forced to step down as Britain's ambassador to Washington last week after emails between him and Epstein surfaced, including one in which Mandelson urged the disgraced financier to fight back against his conviction. "If you think what happened to Peter Mandelson is bad, you have no idea what will happen when the Andrew emails are released," the source told the paper.<h2>Prince Andrew could face criminal charges</h2>David Boies, the lawyer who represented Andrew's accuser Virginia Giuffre, said he believes there was enough evidence to warrant a criminal investigation into the prince. Andrew has consistently denied Giuffre's claims that she was trafficked to him by Epstein. In 2022, he settled a civil case with her for a reported £12 million, without admitting liability.Emails already in the public domain have shed light on Andrew's contact with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. In 2011, one email — widely attributed to the prince — told Epstein: "Keep in close touch and we'll play some more soon!!" In 2015, Andrew emailed Maxwell asking for information about Giuffre, to which she replied, "Have some info. Call me when you have a moment."The Mail on Sunday says at least 100 more emails exist, including from a Pipex account linked to Andrew and listed in Epstein's notorious "black book" alongside several phone numbers for the duke. Sources claim these messages include exchanges with both Epstein and Maxwell about social meetings and logistics.US lawmakers are now considering whether to invite Andrew and Mandelson to testify before the House Oversight Committee. While British citizens cannot be subpoenaed, declining such an invitation would be politically damaging, one source said.

A bombshell trove of Epstein emails — some allegedly involving Prince Andrew — is being reviewed in Washington, with insiders warning the Duke of York could be “destroyed.” Here's all you need to know.

Prince Andrew could be "destroyed" by more than 100 secret emails contained in the so-called Epstein Files, The Mail on Sunday has reported. According to the report, the cache of emails includes "incriminating" correspondence between the Duke of York and paedophile, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The documents are among hundreds of thousands being reviewed by the US Congress before their expected release. Citing a source, the publication reports that the emails were “embarrassing and incriminating, and he (Prince Andrew) could be destroyed.” Here's all we know about the Prince Andrew-Jeffrey Epstein emails. Forget Peter Mandelson, Andrew would face worse Speaking to the publication, one person in the know predicted that Prince Andrew would face a worse fallout than Peter Mandelson. Lord Mandelson was forced to step down as Britain's ambassador to Washington last week after emails between him and Epstein surfaced, including one in which Mandelson urged the disgraced financier to fight back against his conviction. "If you think what happened to Peter Mandelson is bad, you have no idea what will happen when the Andrew emails are released," the source told the paper. Prince Andrew could face criminal charges David Boies, the lawyer who represented Andrew's accuser Virginia Giuffre, said he believes there was enough evidence to warrant a criminal investigation into the prince. Andrew has consistently denied Giuffre's claims that she was trafficked to him by Epstein. In 2022, he settled a civil case with her for a reported £12 million, without admitting liability. Emails already in the public domain have shed light on Andrew's contact with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. In 2011, one email — widely attributed to the prince — told Epstein: "Keep in close touch and we'll play some more soon!!" In 2015, Andrew emailed Maxwell asking for information about Giuffre, to which she replied, "Have some info. Call me when you have a moment." The Mail on Sunday says at least 100 more emails exist, including from a Pipex account linked to Andrew and listed in Epstein's notorious "black book" alongside several phone numbers for the duke. Sources claim these messages include exchanges with both Epstein and Maxwell about social meetings and logistics. US lawmakers are now considering whether to invite Andrew and Mandelson to testify before the House Oversight Committee. While British citizens cannot be subpoenaed, declining such an invitation would be politically damaging, one source said.

A bombshell trove of Epstein emails — some allegedly involving Prince Andrew — is being reviewed in Washington, with insiders warning the Duke of York could be “destroyed.”

Bombshell! New 'embarrassing and incriminating' Epstein emails could 'destroy' Prince Andrew: Report

Britain's ambassador to the U.S., Peter Mandelson, has said he deeply regrets ever meeting Jeffrey Epstein and that he had carried on that association "for far longer than I should have done".


UK envoy Peter Mandelson's 50th birthday message to Epstein goes public

Victims of Jeffrey Epstein gathered outside the U.S. Congress, demanding justice and transparency. They’ve issued a strong warning — release the full client list, or they will. The pressure is mounting on lawmakers and institutions tied to the case.

Epstein victims demand justice from Congress 

epstein-files

Epstein Files, News on Epstein Files, stories on Epstein Files, articles on Epstein Files, Epstein Files stories at Wion, Epstein Files news, Epstein Files latest news

epstein files