US President Donald Trump has escalated tensions by demanding that Iran pay billions in war reparations and compensation for damages caused over the past 50 years. Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump asserted that the US Navy maintains "100 percent control" and an infallible blockade over the strategic Strait of Hormuz.


US-Iran war: Trump says Iran should pay for damages it’s done over 50 years

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order calling for a rethink of the country's childhood vaccination policies, including school vaccine requirements and the use of the combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) shot.The order, signed Monday (Aug 10), directs the US Health and Human Services Department to explore making the MMR vaccine available as three separate shots rather than primarily as a combination vaccine. It also asks states and territories to review federal recommendations on vaccination requirements for school enrollment and attendance.The move has drawn sharp criticism from medical experts, who say there is no scientific basis for splitting the MMR vaccine and warn that changing established vaccination guidance could increase vaccine hesitancy.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/baba-vanga-s-2026-prophecy-2-predictions-already-came-true-3-terrifying-ones-remain-first-human-alien-contact-world-war-3-and-putin-s-exit-1786169922573">Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside</a><h2>Trump pushes separate MMR shots</h2>Under the order, HHS will create a task force to work with the private sector and other countries to make individual measles, mumps and rubella vaccines available, while continuing to ensure access to combination vaccines.Trump has repeatedly questioned the combined MMR shot. His latest move comes as the US faces its worst measles outbreak in 35 years.Medical organisations, however, say decades of evidence support the safety and effectiveness of the combined vaccine. Andrew Racine, president of the American Academy of Paediatrics, said developing and approving separate vaccines in the US could take more than a decade.Aaron M. Milstone, a member of the AAP's Committee on Infectious Diseases, urged parents to continue using vaccines with decades of safety data.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-sanctions-iran-s-crypto-network-after-strait-of-hormuz-attacks-offers-15m-bounty-for-intel-on-irgc-finance-1786150050092">US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance</a><h2>States retain control over school mandates</h2>The executive order also calls on states and territories to reconsider the administration's immunisation recommendations for settings such as schools. But the federal government cannot simply impose nationwide school vaccination requirements because states have authority over school enrollment and attendance rules.New York City Health Commissioner Alister Martin criticised the move, saying vaccination policy should not be dictated by politics. "Fortunately, vaccination recommendations are not set by the president, nor should they be," Martin said.<h2>Kennedy's vaccine agenda under scrutiny</h2>The order is closely aligned with the priorities of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine sceptic who has promoted claims linking vaccines to autism despite those claims being repeatedly debunked by scientific research.Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician who played a decisive role in Kennedy's confirmation, also opposed Trump's latest move. "This executive order is wrong," Cassidy said, arguing that it could increase vaccine hesitancy and make children less safe.The latest order comes just weeks before children return to school across the US, at a time when measles cases have surged. &nbsp;

Donald Trump has ordered a major rethink of childhood vaccination policy in the US, including the widely used MMR shot and school vaccine requirements. The move comes as measles cases surge across the country and has already triggered a sharp backlash from doctors.

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order calling for a rethink of the country's childhood vaccination policies, including school vaccine requirements and the use of the combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) shot. The order, signed Monday (Aug 10), directs the US Health and Human Services Department to explore making the MMR vaccine available as three separate shots rather than primarily as a combination vaccine. It also asks states and territories to review federal recommendations on vaccination requirements for school enrollment and attendance. The move has drawn sharp criticism from medical experts, who say there is no scientific basis for splitting the MMR vaccine and warn that changing established vaccination guidance could increase vaccine hesitancy. Also read | Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside Trump pushes separate MMR shots Under the order, HHS will create a task force to work with the private sector and other countries to make individual measles, mumps and rubella vaccines available, while continuing to ensure access to combination vaccines. Trump has repeatedly questioned the combined MMR shot. His latest move comes as the US faces its worst measles outbreak in 35 years. Medical organisations, however, say decades of evidence support the safety and effectiveness of the combined vaccine. Andrew Racine, president of the American Academy of Paediatrics, said developing and approving separate vaccines in the US could take more than a decade. Aaron M. Milstone, a member of the AAP's Committee on Infectious Diseases, urged parents to continue using vaccines with decades of safety data. Also read | US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance States retain control over school mandates The executive order also calls on states and territories to reconsider the administration's immunisation recommendations for settings such as schools. But the federal government cannot simply impose nationwide school vaccination requirements because states have authority over school enrollment and attendance rules. New York City Health Commissioner Alister Martin criticised the move, saying vaccination policy should not be dictated by politics. "Fortunately, vaccination recommendations are not set by the president, nor should they be," Martin said. Kennedy's vaccine agenda under scrutiny The order is closely aligned with the priorities of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine sceptic who has promoted claims linking vaccines to autism despite those claims being repeatedly debunked by scientific research. Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician who played a decisive role in Kennedy's confirmation, also opposed Trump's latest move. "This executive order is wrong," Cassidy said, arguing that it could increase vaccine hesitancy and make children less safe. The latest order comes just weeks before children return to school across the US, at a time when measles cases have surged.

Donald Trump has ordered a major rethink of childhood vaccination policy in the US, including the widely used MMR shot and school vaccine requirements. The move comes as measles cases surge across the country and has already triggered a sharp backlash from doctors.

MMR vaccine under fire: Trump orders review as US battles worst measles outbreak in 35 years

US President Donald Trump reacted to Iran’s demand of compensation for damage caused during the five-month military conflict saying that Tehran should instead pay reparations for “all of the people that they have killed and ⁠gravely wounded” during the five-month military conflict and the Iranian citizens killed over the last 50 years.&nbsp;In a post on Truth Social, Trump said Iranian representatives were seeking compensation for damage caused during the conflict, which he said began because Iran would not have a nuclear weapon.&nbsp;&nbsp;The US president added that the issue had not been raised during previous negotiations or meetings.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/powerful-quake-of-7-4-magnitude-strikes-colombia-tremors-felt-in-bogota-other-regions-1786367644490">47 killed as powerful quake of 7.4 magnitude jolts Colombia; several buildings collapse</a>&nbsp;“I see that Representatives of the Islamic Republic of Iran are asking for compensation for the damage done to them during the last five month Military Conflict (started because, THEY WILL NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON), even though it was never mentioned in any of our negotiations or meetings!” he wrote.&nbsp;Trump then called it an “interesting idea” and turned around the compensation demand back on Iran saying the American demand would cover people killed and seriously wounded in conflicts involving Iran, including the families of those killed in the USS Cole attack and others killed in combat.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/bangladesh-pm-restates-request-for-hasina-extradition-in-talks-with-indian-envoy-1786373569990">Bangladesh PM restates request for Hasina extradition in talks with Indian envoy</a>&nbsp;“But it is an interesting idea because now I am likewise demanding compensation from Iran, for all of the people that they have killed and gravely wounded with their roadside bombs and many conflicts, for which they are famous, as led initially by General Soleimani, including the families of those killed on the USS Cole, and thousands of others killed in combat,” he said.&nbsp;The US President then raised the demand of compensation to the kin of the hundreds and thousands of innocent Iranians killed over the past 50 years for protesting against the regime. He also claimed that 52,000 people had been killed in the last five months.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/jharkhand-protesters-enter-assembly-premises-brave-lathicharge-tear-gas-cid-arrests-ex-jpsc-chief-1786365290272">Jharkhand protesters enter assembly premises, brave lathicharge, tear gas; CID arrests ex-JPSC chief</a>&nbsp;“Additionally, compensation should be paid to the families of the hundreds of thousands of innocent protestors that Iran has killed over the last 50 years, not to mention the 52,000 that have been killed in the last five months. I have instructed my representatives to put this firmly into any, and all, future negotiations,” Trump said.&nbsp;Trump later said in a fresh post, “Also, with respect to the Iran negotiations, Iran should be responsible for the damages and death caused to the people of Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza!”&nbsp;Trump’s reaction came soon after Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei made six new appointments to ⁠the ⁠Revolutionary Guards and armed forces. Mojtaba appointed Major General Pilot Ali Abdollahi ⁠as chief of staff of the ⁠armed forces and Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi as commander-in-chief of the IRGC.

President Trump called it an “interesting idea” and turned around the compensation demand back on Iran saying the US demand would cover people killed and seriously wounded in conflicts involving Iran, including the families of those killed in the USS Cole attack and others killed in combat.

US President Donald Trump reacted to Iran’s demand of compensation for damage caused during the five-month military conflict saying that Tehran should instead pay reparations for “all of the people that they have killed and ⁠gravely wounded” during the five-month military conflict and the Iranian citizens killed over the last 50 years. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said Iranian representatives were seeking compensation for damage caused during the conflict, which he said began because Iran would not have a nuclear weapon. The US president added that the issue had not been raised during previous negotiations or meetings. Also Read: 47 killed as powerful quake of 7.4 magnitude jolts Colombia; several buildings collapse “I see that Representatives of the Islamic Republic of Iran are asking for compensation for the damage done to them during the last five month Military Conflict (started because, THEY WILL NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON), even though it was never mentioned in any of our negotiations or meetings!” he wrote. Trump then called it an “interesting idea” and turned around the compensation demand back on Iran saying the American demand would cover people killed and seriously wounded in conflicts involving Iran, including the families of those killed in the USS Cole attack and others killed in combat.

President Trump called it an “interesting idea” and turned around the compensation demand back on Iran saying the US demand would cover people killed and seriously wounded in conflicts involving Iran, including the families of those killed in the USS Cole attack and others killed in combat.

Trump turns around Iran’s demand for compensation back on it, says Tehran must pay for those killed, wounded

US President Donald Trump admitted that the reflecting pool had “some contractor error” during the rennovation, to meet the deadline for a July 4 reopening, however he continued to accuse the former Olympian David Hearn of vandalising the landmark, despite charges against him being dropped.&nbsp;“There was substantial damage to the Reflecting Pool, also but, unfortunately, there is no video or proof, other than the damage, itself,” he wrote on Truth Social. “We are working on the Pool, and it will reopen shortly. As with many jobs, there was also some contractor error done by rushing the job for a July 4th opening, but it was a very small area of this massive Pool, and was relatively inconsequential.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/hong-kong-temperature-record-39-8c-typhoon-dolphin-extreme-heat-1786371488659">Hong Kong breaks all-time temperature record with 39.8°C as Typhoon Dolphin drives extreme heat</a>Trump in his post claimed that there was “a highly credible witness” who saw the Olympian vandalise the pool “in broad daylight” by “ ‘violently’ ripping and tugging at the Pool’s somewhat delicate coating.” He also added that the National Park Service employee has testified, and shared a screenshot of the text. He added that this employee’s testimony was provided to Jeanine Pirro, the US attorney for the District of Columbia.Trump has been pushing Pirro to backtrack on its move to drop the charges against people accused of vandalising the pool.The Olympian David Hearn was arrested on June 19, and later indicted on one charge of destruction of property of $1,000 or more on July 2 and pleaded not guilty a week later, according to D.C. Superior Court.&nbsp;Trump’s post came a day after he posted two photos of alleged vandalism to the pool area on Truth Social. The images appear to show graffiti and peeling of the pool’s coating.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Donald Trump acknowledged contractor errors during the White House Reflecting Pool renovation while continuing to accuse Olympian David Hearn of vandalism.

US President Donald Trump admitted that the reflecting pool had “some contractor error” during the rennovation, to meet the deadline for a July 4 reopening, however he continued to accuse the former Olympian David Hearn of vandalising the landmark, despite charges against him being dropped. “There was substantial damage to the Reflecting Pool, also but, unfortunately, there is no video or proof, other than the damage, itself,” he wrote on Truth Social. “We are working on the Pool, and it will reopen shortly. As with many jobs, there was also some contractor error done by rushing the job for a July 4th opening, but it was a very small area of this massive Pool, and was relatively inconsequential.” Also Read: Hong Kong breaks all-time temperature record with 39.8°C as Typhoon Dolphin drives extreme heat Trump in his post claimed that there was “a highly credible witness” who saw the Olympian vandalise the pool “in broad daylight” by “ ‘violently’ ripping and tugging at the Pool’s somewhat delicate coating.” He also added that the National Park Service employee has testified, and shared a screenshot of the text. He added that this employee’s testimony was provided to Jeanine Pirro, the US attorney for the District of Columbia.Trump has been pushing Pirro to backtrack on its move to drop the charges against people accused of vandalising the pool. The Olympian David Hearn was arrested on June 19, and later indicted on one charge of destruction of property of $1,000 or more on July 2 and pleaded not guilty a week later, according to D.C. Superior Court. Trump’s post came a day after he posted two photos of alleged vandalism to the pool area on Truth Social. The images appear to show graffiti and peeling of the pool’s coating.

Donald Trump acknowledged contractor errors during the White House Reflecting Pool renovation while continuing to accuse Olympian David Hearn of vandalism.

Trump admits ‘contractor error’ damaged Reflecting Pool, still blames Olympian

US President Donald Trump on Sunday told Axios that the US is currently choosing economic pressure over renewed military conflict. He said that the US is currently “low-keying” it. Washington is prioritising economic and diplomatic pressure, claiming that Iran is in “very bad shape” with its poor economy and soaring inflation. On the other hand, oil is down to slightly over $75 a barrel, and US consumers are at relative ease from the pain of the war. He said that they are semi-negotiating with Iran and likened the back and forth with Iran to a “chess game”."We are only semi-negotiating with them. We are just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact they have no money," Trump told Axios. He claimed that Iran has no money to pay its troops and the US naval blockade has exacerbated the Iranian regime's economic crisis. Trump seemed optimistic despite the recent failure to force Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz or to get a favourable deal: "It will work out. It always works out. It's like a chess game." Vice President JD Vance described the strategy as using a combination of diplomatic, economic and military measures to protect US interests.The approach represents a shift from last week. Axios reports that Trump had been close to ordering a return to major combat operations against Iran, but advisers persuaded him to pursue a less confrontational course for now. The US, Iran and Oman are working toward an agreement aimed at managing traffic at the Strait of Hormuz, in which Iran will have partial control.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/typhoon-dolphin-landfall-china-evacuation-flights-cancelled-1786291306578">Typhoon Dolphin makes landfall in China, triggers mass evacuation and flight cancellations</a><h2>Iran presents fresh conditions for reopening of Hormuz</h2>“While an agreement may be reached, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz remains contingent on a series of conditions that have been communicated through intermediaries,” said Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi. He said that there are no direct negotiations going on with the US and it is likely to continue unless the US ceases its violence.US claims that there is growing division within the Iranian leadership. According to Axios, US officials believe that President Masoud Pezeshkian and other pragmatist, pro-negotiation officials have been pushing diplomacy, and worried about an economic collapse. While Hardline elements around Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and the security establishment appear more resistant to concessions. Iranian state media reported that Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has held a meeting with Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei to discuss the country's military and economic affairs.The official Iranian position, however, remains united.&nbsp;On Saturday, the head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, laid out fresh demands for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. &nbsp;“Never threaten nor insult Iran in any language, permanently end the war against Iran and Iran's allies in Lebanon, Gaza, Yemen, and Iraq, and lift the naval blockade and withdraw military forces from the surroundings of Iran." He added a demand for full compensation for war damages, lifting of all sanctions and releasing all Iranian frozen funds. Earlier, these demands were a prerequisite for a nuclear deal, but now these are conditions for opening the Strait of Hormuz&nbsp;&nbsp;

Donald Trump says the US is prioritising economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran as Tehran sets fresh conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday told Axios that the US is currently choosing economic pressure over renewed military conflict. He said that the US is currently “low-keying” it. Washington is prioritising economic and diplomatic pressure, claiming that Iran is in “very bad shape” with its poor economy and soaring inflation. On the other hand, oil is down to slightly over $75 a barrel, and US consumers are at relative ease from the pain of the war. He said that they are semi-negotiating with Iran and likened the back and forth with Iran to a “chess game”. "We are only semi-negotiating with them. We are just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact they have no money," Trump told Axios. He claimed that Iran has no money to pay its troops and the US naval blockade has exacerbated the Iranian regime's economic crisis. Trump seemed optimistic despite the recent failure to force Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz or to get a favourable deal: "It will work out. It always works out. It's like a chess game." Vice President JD Vance described the strategy as using a combination of diplomatic, economic and military measures to protect US interests. The approach represents a shift from last week. Axios reports that Trump had been close to ordering a return to major combat operations against Iran, but advisers persuaded him to pursue a less confrontational course for now. The US, Iran and Oman are working toward an agreement aimed at managing traffic at the Strait of Hormuz, in which Iran will have partial control. Also Read: Typhoon Dolphin makes landfall in China, triggers mass evacuation and flight cancellations Iran presents fresh conditions for reopening of Hormuz “While an agreement may be reached, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz remains contingent on a series of conditions that have been communicated through intermediaries,” said Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi. He said that there are no direct negotiations going on with the US and it is likely to continue unless the US ceases its violence. US claims that there is growing division within the Iranian leadership. According to Axios, US officials believe that President Masoud Pezeshkian and other pragmatist, pro-negotiation officials have been pushing diplomacy, and worried about an economic collapse. While Hardline elements around Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and the security establishment appear more resistant to concessions. Iranian state media reported that Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has held a meeting with Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei to discuss the country's military and economic affairs. The official Iranian position, however, remains united. On Saturday, the head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, laid out fresh demands for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. “Never threaten nor insult Iran in any language, permanently end the war against Iran and Iran's allies in Lebanon, Gaza, Yemen, and Iraq, and lift the naval blockade and withdraw military forces from the surroundings of Iran." He added a demand for full compensation for war damages, lifting of all sanctions and releasing all Iranian frozen funds. Earlier, these demands were a prerequisite for a nuclear deal, but now these are conditions for opening the Strait of Hormuz

Donald Trump says the US is prioritising economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran as Tehran sets fresh conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump calls Iran standoff a 'chess game' claims US is 'low-keying' war

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel has rejected ⁠the 15-point plan extended by US President Donald ⁠Trump’s Board of Peace for Gaza and would not withdraw its forces until Hamas was disarmed.&nbsp;At the start of the weekly cabinet meeting, Netanyahu denied claims that Israel had accepted the US-backed proposal and said, “I want to clarify here. Israel rejects the 15-point document.”&nbsp;“The [army] will not carry out any withdrawal until Hamas is genuinely disarmed.”&nbsp;He said Israel was seeking the group’s real dismantlement, “not fictitious decomposition,” and was discussing the matter with Washington.“Now, we are talking to the Americans about this issue. They have ideas; some of them are acceptable to us, and some are not,” he said.&nbsp;The US-backed Board of Peace is trying to move forward with its roadmap for postwar Gaza, which Hamas has accepted. Israeli officials warn that the terror organization is exploiting the process to prevent renewed Israeli military action.&nbsp;<h2>‘Know how to stand up against…’: Netanyahu</h2>&nbsp;Netanyahu praised President Trump for his partnership against Iran but declared that he knows how to stand up against Israel’s closest allies when he must.&nbsp;“I have great appreciation for President Trump,” Netanyahu said. “He is a great friend of ours in the White House. I greatly appreciate the historic partnership with the United States against Iran’s attempts to acquire nuclear weapons. And I want to emphasize again: With an agreement or without an agreement, as long as I am prime minister, Iran will not have nuclear weapons.”&nbsp;“Unlike all those who preach to us, we are doing what needs to be done for Israel’s security, and we can and know how to stand our ground even against our very best friends when necessary,” he says.&nbsp;Hamas still retains the ability to mount an assault on Israel, he claimed.“It may attack, but why have long weeks gone by without it attacking us? Because it knows what a powerful blow we will inflict on it if it does,” says Netanyahu.&nbsp;<h2>‘Security of Israel’s citizens not up for negotiation’&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Netanyahu said that “the security of all Israel’s citizens is not up for negotiation. We stand firm on these interests.”“We are not doing this in advertising agencies. We are doing it for real, on the ground,” Netanyahu said in an apparent dig at his political rivals, who accuse him of being weak in the face of US pressure.&nbsp;Netanyahu further said that some people are also spreading rumours about Lebanon.&nbsp;&nbsp;“Regarding Lebanon — here too we are hearing all kinds of rumours,” he said.&nbsp;&nbsp;“I want to make it clear: in recent days, Israel has acted forcefully in Lebanon, eliminating terrorists, including in the Ali al-Taher ridge. I cannot elaborate on this. We are engaged in a very important operation. We are acting with sound judgment and wisdom.”

The US-backed Board of Peace is trying to move forward with its roadmap for postwar Gaza, which the Hamas terror group has accepted. Israeli officials warn that the Iran-backed terror organisation is exploiting the process to prevent renewed Israeli military action.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel has rejected ⁠the 15-point plan extended by US President Donald ⁠Trump’s Board of Peace for Gaza and would not withdraw its forces until Hamas was disarmed. At the start of the weekly cabinet meeting, Netanyahu denied claims that Israel had accepted the US-backed proposal and said, “I want to clarify here. Israel rejects the 15-point document.” “The [army] will not carry out any withdrawal until Hamas is genuinely disarmed.” He said Israel was seeking the group’s real dismantlement, “not fictitious decomposition,” and was discussing the matter with Washington. “Now, we are talking to the Americans about this issue. They have ideas; some of them are acceptable to us, and some are not,” he said. The US-backed Board of Peace is trying to move forward with its roadmap for postwar Gaza, which Hamas has accepted. Israeli officials warn that the terror organization is exploiting the process to prevent renewed Israeli military action. ‘Know how to stand up against…’: Netanyahu Netanyahu praised President Trump for his partnership against Iran but declared that he knows how to stand up against Israel’s closest allies when he must. “I have great appreciation for President Trump,” Netanyahu said. “He is a great friend of ours in the White House. I greatly appreciate the historic partnership with the United States against Iran’s attempts to acquire nuclear weapons. And I want to emphasize again: With an agreement or without an agreement, as long as I am prime minister, Iran will not have nuclear weapons.” “Unlike all those who preach to us, we are doing what needs to be done for Israel’s security, and we can and know how to stand our ground even against our very best friends when necessary,” he says. Hamas still retains the ability to mount an assault on Israel, he claimed. “It may attack, but why have long weeks gone by without it attacking us? Because it knows what a powerful blow we will inflict on it if it does,” says Netanyahu. ‘Security of Israel’s citizens not up for negotiation’ Netanyahu said that “the security of all Israel’s citizens is not up for negotiation. We stand firm on these interests.” “We are not doing this in advertising agencies. We are doing it for real, on the ground,” Netanyahu said in an apparent dig at his political rivals, who accuse him of being weak in the face of US pressure. Netanyahu further said that some people are also spreading rumours about Lebanon. “Regarding Lebanon — here too we are hearing all kinds of rumours,” he said. “I want to make it clear: in recent days, Israel has acted forcefully in Lebanon, eliminating terrorists, including in the Ali al-Taher ridge. I cannot elaborate on this. We are engaged in a very important operation. We are acting with sound judgment and wisdom.”

The US-backed Board of Peace is trying to move forward with its roadmap for postwar Gaza, which the Hamas terror group has accepted. Israeli officials warn that the Iran-backed terror organisation is exploiting the process to prevent renewed Israeli military action.

Netanyahu says Israel rejects Board of Peace plan for Gaza disarmament

US President Donald Trump’s prolonged war with Iran has sharply reduced US weapons stockpiles, forcing the Pentagon to draw supplies from military positions in Europe and Asia and delaying deliveries to American allies, according to senior US and Western officials. The depletion of air-defense interceptors, long-range missiles and other critical munitions is raising concerns within military and intelligence circles that the United States could be less prepared for another major conflict. Analysts warn that Russia and China could interpret the shrinking inventories as an opportunity to test American power.&nbsp;The Iran campaign has consumed thousands of expensive precision-guided missiles, many of which rely on specialised components manufactured through a complex global supply chain. At the same time, US forces have used large numbers of air-defense missiles to counter Iranian attacks. Officials say the resulting shortages have become serious enough for the United States to delay some weapons deliveries to European and Asian partners. The war has also required the Pentagon to move ships, aircraft and air-defense systems from Europe and Asia into the Middle East. That redeployment has created additional pressure on equipment maintenance, military readiness and troop morale, officials said.&nbsp;The cumulative effect is a significant reduction in US firepower in regions where Washington has spent years preparing for possible confrontations with Russia and China. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected concerns about America's ability to conduct military operations, saying the United States has “more than enough firepower to carry out any operation the president orders at any time and place.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nuclear-weapons-are-absolute-evil-nagasaki-warns-world-on-81st-bombing-anniversary-1786267409413">‘Nuclear weapons are absolute evil’: Nagasaki warns world on 81st bombing anniversary</a><h2>Pentagon warned Trump about stockpile risks</h2>Before the Iran campaign began, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned President Trump about the risks of drawing further on already-depleted weapons inventories, according to two officials familiar with the discussions. Trump nevertheless proceeded, expecting the conflict to end quickly. Officials say concerns about dwindling munitions contributed to Trump's decision to abandon a major bombing campaign late last month. More than 1,500 Patriot interceptors have reportedly been used during the Iran war, while the current US inventory is estimated at fewer than 1,700, according to two people briefed on the stockpile.<h2>Trump administration pushes back on shortage reports</h2>Trump has reacted angrily to reports about US weapons shortages and has ordered a broad investigation into suspected government leaks. He has also called for criminal prosecutions of officials responsible for releasing sensitive information. According to people familiar with his private comments, Trump believes public discussion of weapons shortages could signal weakness to American adversaries. In public, he has dismissed concerns about depleted inventories or attributed shortages to the Biden administration.&nbsp;“Our defense companies are making more munitions than ever before, while rapidly expanding their plants and equipment at record levels,” Ms. Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement. “Anyone entrusted with access to classified military information who leaks it to the media is betraying that trust and breaking federal law, and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also rejected reports of shortages, saying the United States has “everything required to strike at the time and place of the president’s choosing.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-escalates-russian-strikes-kill-three-including-child-kyiv-hit-by-fresh-attacks-1786197601922/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-escalates-russian-strikes-kill-three-including-child-kyiv-hit-by-fresh-attacks-1786197601922/embed</a><h2>Russia and China closely watching US inventories</h2>Russian and Chinese military planners are closely monitoring US weapons inventories, according to a US official familiar with defense intelligence. They can estimate American stockpile levels using publicly available information, including congressional budget documents and announcements from defense contractors, while also relying on intelligence gathered through satellites and other surveillance systems.

US weapons stockpiles face pressure after the Iran war as air-defense missiles and long-range munitions run low, raising concerns over Russia, China and Ukraine

US President Donald Trump’s prolonged war with Iran has sharply reduced US weapons stockpiles, forcing the Pentagon to draw supplies from military positions in Europe and Asia and delaying deliveries to American allies, according to senior US and Western officials. The depletion of air-defense interceptors, long-range missiles and other critical munitions is raising concerns within military and intelligence circles that the United States could be less prepared for another major conflict. Analysts warn that Russia and China could interpret the shrinking inventories as an opportunity to test American power. The Iran campaign has consumed thousands of expensive precision-guided missiles, many of which rely on specialised components manufactured through a complex global supply chain. At the same time, US forces have used large numbers of air-defense missiles to counter Iranian attacks. Officials say the resulting shortages have become serious enough for the United States to delay some weapons deliveries to European and Asian partners. The war has also required the Pentagon to move ships, aircraft and air-defense systems from Europe and Asia into the Middle East. That redeployment has created additional pressure on equipment maintenance, military readiness and troop morale, officials said. The cumulative effect is a significant reduction in US firepower in regions where Washington has spent years preparing for possible confrontations with Russia and China. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected concerns about America's ability to conduct military operations, saying the United States has “more than enough firepower to carry out any operation the president orders at any time and place.” Also Read: ‘Nuclear weapons are absolute evil’: Nagasaki warns world on 81st bombing anniversary Pentagon warned Trump about stockpile risks Before the Iran campaign began, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned President Trump about the risks of drawing further on already-depleted weapons inventories, according to two officials familiar with the discussions. Trump nevertheless proceeded, expecting the conflict to end quickly. Officials say concerns about dwindling munitions contributed to Trump's decision to abandon a major bombing campaign late last month. More than 1,500 Patriot interceptors have reportedly been used during the Iran war, while the current US inventory is estimated at fewer than 1,700, according to two people briefed on the stockpile. Trump administration pushes back on shortage reports Trump has reacted angrily to reports about US weapons shortages and has ordered a broad investigation into suspected government leaks. He has also called for criminal prosecutions of officials responsible for releasing sensitive information. According to people familiar with his private comments, Trump believes public discussion of weapons shortages could signal weakness to American adversaries. In public, he has dismissed concerns about depleted inventories or attributed shortages to the Biden administration. “Our defense companies are making more munitions than ever before, while rapidly expanding their plants and equipment at record levels,” Ms. Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement. “Anyone entrusted with access to classified military information who leaks it to the media is betraying that trust and breaking federal law, and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also rejected reports of shortages, saying the United States has “everything required to strike at the time and place of the president’s choosing.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-escalates-russian-strikes-kill-three-including-child-kyiv-hit-by-fresh-attacks-1786197601922/embed Russia and China closely watching US inventories Russian and Chinese military planners are closely monitoring US weapons inventories, according to a US official familiar with defense intelligence. They can estimate American stockpile levels using publicly available information, including congressional budget documents and announcements from defense contractors, while also relying on intelligence gathered through satellites and other surveillance systems.

US weapons stockpiles are shrinking after the Iran war, raising concerns over air defenses, Ukraine aid and America’s ability to deter Russia and China

US is burning through its arsenal in Iran. Russia and China are watching closely

A TikTok video that included Taylor Swift's song "August" posted four days ago to the account for US President Donald Trump's campaign has had the sound removed, according to Variety.<h2>What was the video</h2>The video, posted four days ago by the official @TeamTrump TikTok account, featured Trump and Melania Trump standing on a balcony and watching fireworks. The text over the video read, "Mood because it's August and Donald Trump is your president." Its caption originally read, "I'm sure @Taylor Swift is going to be super excited we used her song! #taylorswift #maga #august."&nbsp;Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/trump-is-your-president-white-house-trolls-taylor-swift-and-travis-kelce-copies-their-wedding-announcement-1783152931968"> 'Trump is your President': White House trolls Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce, copies their wedding announcement</a>&nbsp;Fans noticed that Swift's "August", from her 2020 album Folklore, had been removed from the video. In the US version of TikTok, a message displayed on the post says: "The copyright owner hasn't made this sound available in your country," according to Variety.<h2>Fans reactions to the removal</h2>One of the top comments on the video reacted to the removal, with a user writing: "TAYLOR REMOVING THE AUDIO QUEEEEEEN." The @TeamTrump TikTok account, which has around 14 million followers, was created ahead of the 2024 US presidential election and has continued to post videos regularly since Trump returned to the White House for a second term, as per the outlet.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/taylor-swift-is-richest-female-musician-in-history-but-where-does-she-rank-among-the-world-s-billionaires-1780757509072">Taylor Swift is richest female musician in history</a> This is not the first Trump campaign TikTok featuring Swift's music to lose its audio. A Team Trump video featuring Swift's song "Father Figure", posted on November 6, 2025, has also had its audio removed.&nbsp;However, a Team Trump video posted a day ago featuring a version of Swift's "Red" still had its audio track available as of the time of reporting. A video posted on the official White House TikTok account last November also continues to feature Swift's "The Fate of Ophelia".&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/taylor-swift-breaks-streaming-record-with-new-showgirl-album-1759545935771">Taylor Swift breaks streaming record with new 'Showgirl' album&nbsp;</a><h2>Swift and Trump's previous clashes</h2>Swift and Trump have previously clashed publicly over politics. In September 2024, Trump posted "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!" on social media after the singer announced her support for then-Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, according to Variety.&nbsp;"I'm voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them," Swift had written in an Instagram post.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/taylor-swift-sued-for-trademark-infringement-of-album-the-life-of-a-showgirl-here-s-what-we-know-1774895667628">Taylor Swift sued for trademark infringement of album The Life of a Showgirl; Here's what we know</a>&nbsp;The dispute followed another controversy in August 2024, when Trump shared AI-generated images falsely suggesting that Swift had endorsed him for president. One image depicted Swift as Uncle Sam alongside a message reading, "Taylor wants you to vote for Donald Trump," as per the outlet.&nbsp;At the time, Trump suggested in an interview with Fox Business that he was not concerned about Swift suing him over the fabricated images, saying they "were all made up by other people."&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The viral video posted four days ago by the official US President Donald Trump's TikTok account featured him and Melania Trump standing on a balcony and watching fireworks.

A TikTok video that included Taylor Swift's song "August" posted four days ago to the account for US President Donald Trump's campaign has had the sound removed, according to Variety. What was the video The video, posted four days ago by the official @TeamTrump TikTok account, featured Trump and Melania Trump standing on a balcony and watching fireworks. The text over the video read, "Mood because it's August and Donald Trump is your president." Its caption originally read, "I'm sure @Taylor Swift is going to be super excited we used her song! #taylorswift #maga #august." Also Read: 'Trump is your President': White House trolls Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce, copies their wedding announcement Fans noticed that Swift's "August", from her 2020 album Folklore, had been removed from the video. In the US version of TikTok, a message displayed on the post says: "The copyright owner hasn't made this sound available in your country," according to Variety. Fans reactions to the removal One of the top comments on the video reacted to the removal, with a user writing: "TAYLOR REMOVING THE AUDIO QUEEEEEEN." The @TeamTrump TikTok account, which has around 14 million followers, was created ahead of the 2024 US presidential election and has continued to post videos regularly since Trump returned to the White House for a second term, as per the outlet. Also Read: Taylor Swift is richest female musician in history This is not the first Trump campaign TikTok featuring Swift's music to lose its audio. A Team Trump video featuring Swift's song "Father Figure", posted on November 6, 2025, has also had its audio removed. However, a Team Trump video posted a day ago featuring a version of Swift's "Red" still had its audio track available as of the time of reporting. A video posted on the official White House TikTok account last November also continues to feature Swift's "The Fate of Ophelia". Also Read: Taylor Swift breaks streaming record with new 'Showgirl' album Swift and Trump's previous clashes Swift and Trump have previously clashed publicly over politics. In September 2024, Trump posted "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!" on social media after the singer announced her support for then-Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, according to Variety. "I'm voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them," Swift had written in an Instagram post. Also Read: Taylor Swift sued for trademark infringement of album The Life of a Showgirl; Here's what we know The dispute followed another controversy in August 2024, when Trump shared AI-generated images falsely suggesting that Swift had endorsed him for president. One image depicted Swift as Uncle Sam alongside a message reading, "Taylor wants you to vote for Donald Trump," as per the outlet. At the time, Trump suggested in an interview with Fox Business that he was not concerned about Swift suing him over the fabricated images, saying they "were all made up by other people." Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The viral video posted four days ago by the official US President Donald Trump's TikTok account featured him and Melania Trump standing on a balcony and watching fireworks.

Donald Trump campaign removes Taylor Swift’s August from TikTok post

The Senate on Saturday overwhelmingly approved a stopgap spending bill aimed at preventing a government shutdown at the end of September, marking a rare bipartisan effort to resolve a looming funding crisis well ahead of the midterm elections. The legislation passed 90-6, with one senator voting present. It would keep the federal government funded at current levels through Dec. 11 while blocking the Trump administration from transferring funds to the Border Patrol, a provision Democrats had demanded. The agreement now faces an uncertain path in the House, where lawmakers are also eager to avoid another shutdown battle ahead of the November elections.&nbsp;The bill includes another controversial provision: a one-month delay in a ban on intoxicating hemp products that is currently scheduled to take effect in November. The provision was added at President Trump’s request and sparked a revolt among some Republicans, briefly putting the entire funding agreement at risk. The Senate's passage came more than a month before the Sept. 30 shutdown deadline, a significant departure from the last-minute funding battles that have become increasingly common in Congress. This time, the political pressure created by the upcoming midterm elections, combined with the fallout from two previous government shutdowns during the fiscal year 2026 cycle, helped senators reach an agreement quickly.&nbsp;“After three unnecessary lapses in funding during the fiscal year 2026 cycle, putting the possibility of yet another harmful shutdown off the table should be a priority for each and every one of us,” said Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine and the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee. Democrats welcomed the provision restricting the administration's ability to redirect money to Border Patrol. The issue had been a central point of contention during the previous government shutdown.&nbsp;“This is an important step forward to prevent a shutdown no one wants and provide the runway we need to negotiate funding bills in the months ahead as we fight to rein in Trump’s corruption and make life more affordable for families back home,” said Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/greenland-raises-strong-warning-over-trump-linked-oil-firm-s-drilling-plans-1786182155726">Greenland raises ‘strong warning’ over Trump-linked oil firm’s drilling plans</a><h2>Senate rejects effort to remove Hemp provision</h2>The Senate also rejected an effort by a group of Republican senators to remove the one-month delay on the intoxicating hemp ban. The delay has drawn particular scrutiny because it would benefit the son-in-law of Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff. He serves as chief executive of companies that distribute and sell intoxicating hemp-derived gummies and vapes, including products marketed under names such as “Trainwreck” and “Blueberry Cookies.”&nbsp;The hemp provision became a major obstacle during Senate negotiations after Republican leaders, at the White House's request, added it to the temporary spending bill. The move angered several Republican senators and threatened to derail the broader funding agreement. Opponents of the delay argued that the ban should take effect as scheduled to address the rapidly expanding market for intoxicating hemp products, including beverages, gummies, cookies and vapes.&nbsp;Such products are widely sold at gas stations, vape shops and convenience stores, where they are not subject to the same regulatory framework as products sold through licensed cannabis dispensaries. “It’s no accident that these products are made to look exactly like something that a kid would want,” Senator Ted Budd, Republican of North Carolina, said in arguing for allowing the ban to take effect as scheduled. He warned that the hemp industry was seeking “to permanently entrench their intoxicating products into the machinery of government.”&nbsp;The Trump administration defended the delay, arguing that the hemp products could provide benefits to veterans and people seeking options for pain management. Senators ultimately voted 61-32 to reject the proposal to remove the delay, allowing the hemp provision to remain in the stopgap spending legislation. With the Senate vote complete, attention now shifts to the House, where lawmakers must decide whether to approve the agreement before the Sept. 30 funding deadline. If enacted, the measure would give Congress additional time to negotiate full-year spending bills while avoiding another potentially disruptive government shutdown.

Senate passes a stopgap spending bill to avert a September government shutdown, restrict Border Patrol fund transfers and delay an intoxicating hemp ban

The Senate on Saturday overwhelmingly approved a stopgap spending bill aimed at preventing a government shutdown at the end of September, marking a rare bipartisan effort to resolve a looming funding crisis well ahead of the midterm elections. The legislation passed 90-6, with one senator voting present. It would keep the federal government funded at current levels through Dec. 11 while blocking the Trump administration from transferring funds to the Border Patrol, a provision Democrats had demanded. The agreement now faces an uncertain path in the House, where lawmakers are also eager to avoid another shutdown battle ahead of the November elections. The bill includes another controversial provision: a one-month delay in a ban on intoxicating hemp products that is currently scheduled to take effect in November. The provision was added at President Trump’s request and sparked a revolt among some Republicans, briefly putting the entire funding agreement at risk. The Senate's passage came more than a month before the Sept. 30 shutdown deadline, a significant departure from the last-minute funding battles that have become increasingly common in Congress. This time, the political pressure created by the upcoming midterm elections, combined with the fallout from two previous government shutdowns during the fiscal year 2026 cycle, helped senators reach an agreement quickly. “After three unnecessary lapses in funding during the fiscal year 2026 cycle, putting the possibility of yet another harmful shutdown off the table should be a priority for each and every one of us,” said Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine and the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee. Democrats welcomed the provision restricting the administration's ability to redirect money to Border Patrol. The issue had been a central point of contention during the previous government shutdown. “This is an important step forward to prevent a shutdown no one wants and provide the runway we need to negotiate funding bills in the months ahead as we fight to rein in Trump’s corruption and make life more affordable for families back home,” said Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. Also Read: Greenland raises ‘strong warning’ over Trump-linked oil firm’s drilling plans Senate rejects effort to remove Hemp provision The Senate also rejected an effort by a group of Republican senators to remove the one-month delay on the intoxicating hemp ban. The delay has drawn particular scrutiny because it would benefit the son-in-law of Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff. He serves as chief executive of companies that distribute and sell intoxicating hemp-derived gummies and vapes, including products marketed under names such as “Trainwreck” and “Blueberry Cookies.” The hemp provision became a major obstacle during Senate negotiations after Republican leaders, at the White House's request, added it to the temporary spending bill. The move angered several Republican senators and threatened to derail the broader funding agreement. Opponents of the delay argued that the ban should take effect as scheduled to address the rapidly expanding market for intoxicating hemp products, including beverages, gummies, cookies and vapes. Such products are widely sold at gas stations, vape shops and convenience stores, where they are not subject to the same regulatory framework as products sold through licensed cannabis dispensaries. “It’s no accident that these products are made to look exactly like something that a kid would want,” Senator Ted Budd, Republican of North Carolina, said in arguing for allowing the ban to take effect as scheduled. He warned that the hemp industry was seeking “to permanently entrench their intoxicating products into the machinery of government.” The Trump administration defended the delay, arguing that the hemp products could provide benefits to veterans and people seeking options for pain management. Senators ultimately voted 61-32 to reject the proposal to remove the delay, allowing the hemp provision to remain in the stopgap spending legislation. With the Senate vote complete, attention now shifts to the House, where lawmakers must decide whether to approve the agreement before the Sept. 30 funding deadline. If enacted, the measure would give Congress additional time to negotiate full-year spending bills while avoiding another potentially disruptive government shutdown.

Senate passes a bipartisan stopgap spending bill to prevent a September government shutdown, while delaying a controversial intoxicating hemp ban

US Senate passes Stopgap Spending Bill to avert September government shutdown

US President Donald Trump has suffered a major legal setback after a federal appeals court upheld an order halting work on his planned White House ballroom.

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled 2–1 against the Trump administration, agreeing that such a major overhaul of the White House requires explicit approval from Congress. The court said the decision over whether to construct a massive ballroom belongs to Congress rather than the executive branch.

The ruling puts Trump's estimated $400 million project on hold. The appeals court has paused its decision for two weeks, giving the Trump administration time to ask the US Supreme Court to intervene.

US Appeals Court Blocks Trump’s $400 Million White House Ballroom Project

US President Donald Trump has renewed his effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, reigniting a major legal and political battle over presidential power and the independence of America's central bank.

The Trump administration is seeking Cook's removal over allegations involving mortgage documents from 2021, before she joined the Federal Reserve in 2022. Trump has accused Cook of mortgage fraud, while Cook denies wrongdoing and her lawyers have called the allegations baseless and politically motivated.

The Supreme Court previously ruled 5–4 that Cook could remain in her position while she challenges her removal, finding that she had not been given the required procedural protections. However, the ruling did not permanently prevent Trump from attempting to remove her again.

Chief Justice John Roberts indicated that the president could pursue removal if Cook received proper notice and an opportunity to respond. Cook's deadline to respond is August 26.

Trump Renews Effort to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook | Battle Over Federal Reserve Independence

A Texas-based oil company with links to Donald Trump is preparing to drill exploratory wells in Greenland despite not yet receiving the required permission from local authorities. The development comes as US President Donald Trump continues to threaten to take control of the strategically important Arctic territory. In recent days, equipment intended for drilling operations was brought ashore along Greenland’s remote eastern coast.&nbsp;The move prompted Greenland’s government to issue a ‘strong warning’ that the company had not been granted permission to land the equipment. “All future logistical matters must be advised and approved by the mineral resources authority, before they are carried out,” the government said in a statement. Just two days later, Trump published another provocative post on Truth Social featuring an image of himself looming over a Greenlandic village, renewing attention on the US president’s ambitions for the territory.<h2>Greenland energy targets oil beneath Jameson Land</h2>Greenland Energy, a Texas company established last year, says as much as $1tn worth of crude oil could be located beneath the Jameson Land region. The company has announced plans to spend approximately $60m drilling two exploratory wells to determine whether commercially viable oil reserves exist beneath the remote landscape.&nbsp;However, Greenland halted the issuing of new oil licenses in 2021, citing environmental concerns. A British company, 80 Mile, had already secured exploration rights in Jameson Land. Corporate filings from Greenland Energy indicate that the Texas company plans to acquire a majority stake in the project in return for financing the exploration programme. The project nevertheless requires approval from Greenland’s authorities before drilling can begin.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-personal-lawyer-todd-blanche-confirmed-as-us-attorney-general-1786178125515">Trump’s ex lawyer Todd Blanche confirmed as US Attorney General</a><h2>Trump connections raise further questions</h2>Greenland Energy has hired Phil McGraw, widely known as Dr Phil, to produce a documentary series about the project. McGraw is a prominent rightwing former television host who previously served on Trump’s religious freedom commission. The company has also appointed a US Navy veteran as a director. The individual is involved with Golden Dome, Trump’s proposed missile defence system, which the president has described as making control of Greenland ‘vital’.&nbsp;Larry Swets, Greenland Energy’s chair and a major shareholder, has rejected suggestions that the company's activities are connected to Washington’s push for greater control over Greenland. He has said the oil project is “not related to American annexation”. The company previously faced criticism after a representative falsely told residents at a Jameson Land community meeting in June that permission had been granted to bring drilling equipment ashore. Swets subsequently acknowledged the confusion, saying: “Our enthusiasm for the project led us to communicate in a way that created confusion.”<h2>Drilling equipment arrives despite warning</h2>The controversy intensified the following month when residents of the sparsely populated area spotted a tugboat towing a barge toward the coast. The vessel unloaded about a dozen containers, according to local reports. “The goal was to get the equipment onshore at Nunap Qeqqa [Jameson Land] in connection with planned oil exploration drilling,” the Greenland government’s statement said.&nbsp;Danish investigative outlet Danwatch reported that the head of the shipping company confirmed the delivery was intended for Greenland Energy. The company has declined to answer questions about the operation. In a letter to shareholders issued on Thursday, Greenland Energy said: “Recent high-level meetings between project leadership and Greenlandic regulatory and oversight authorities have been constructive, and we continue to be encouraged by the progress being made toward the remaining approvals required for drilling.” The company added that, following those discussions, it now intends to drill one well initially rather than two.<h2>Environmental concerns complicate Greenland's decision</h2>Greenland’s elected authorities now face a difficult decision over the proposed drilling operation. The territory is semi-autonomous but remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and decisions concerning Greenland’s natural resources are controlled by its local government. Granting permission for oil exploration could expose the government to criticism because the planned drilling appears to be located within a conservation area protected under the Ramsar Convention on wetlands.&nbsp;On the other hand, rejecting the project could potentially create another point of tension with the Trump administration, with some observers concerned that Washington could use the dispute to further its campaign for greater US influence over Greenland. Despite the absence of final approval, Greenland’s government said it 'would not be proportionate' to require the equipment already delivered to be removed. It added that an application for permission was still being processed.<h2>Drilling might start in October</h2>A Greenland Energy representative has reportedly said that a vessel carrying 300 shipping containers of drilling equipment is scheduled to depart Canada on 12 September. The company plans to begin drilling the wells in October, subject to the remaining regulatory approvals.&nbsp;Jeff Landry, the hard-right governor of Louisiana who has been appointed as Trump’s Greenland envoy, has previously suggested that Greenland could be producing oil as early as next year. The planned exploration therefore places Greenland’s environmental regulations, its control over natural resources and the Trump administration’s ambitions for the Arctic territory under renewed scrutiny.

Trump-linked Texas oil company Greenland Energy plans oil drilling in Jameson Land despite Greenland authorities warning that required approval has not been granted

A Texas-based oil company with links to Donald Trump is preparing to drill exploratory wells in Greenland despite not yet receiving the required permission from local authorities. The development comes as US President Donald Trump continues to threaten to take control of the strategically important Arctic territory. In recent days, equipment intended for drilling operations was brought ashore along Greenland’s remote eastern coast. The move prompted Greenland’s government to issue a ‘strong warning’ that the company had not been granted permission to land the equipment. “All future logistical matters must be advised and approved by the mineral resources authority, before they are carried out,” the government said in a statement. Just two days later, Trump published another provocative post on Truth Social featuring an image of himself looming over a Greenlandic village, renewing attention on the US president’s ambitions for the territory. Greenland energy targets oil beneath Jameson Land Greenland Energy, a Texas company established last year, says as much as $1tn worth of crude oil could be located beneath the Jameson Land region. The company has announced plans to spend approximately $60m drilling two exploratory wells to determine whether commercially viable oil reserves exist beneath the remote landscape. However, Greenland halted the issuing of new oil licenses in 2021, citing environmental concerns. A British company, 80 Mile, had already secured exploration rights in Jameson Land. Corporate filings from Greenland Energy indicate that the Texas company plans to acquire a majority stake in the project in return for financing the exploration programme. The project nevertheless requires approval from Greenland’s authorities before drilling can begin. Also Read: Trump’s ex lawyer Todd Blanche confirmed as US Attorney General Trump connections raise further questions Greenland Energy has hired Phil McGraw, widely known as Dr Phil, to produce a documentary series about the project. McGraw is a prominent rightwing former television host who previously served on Trump’s religious freedom commission. The company has also appointed a US Navy veteran as a director. The individual is involved with Golden Dome, Trump’s proposed missile defence system, which the president has described as making control of Greenland ‘vital’. Larry Swets, Greenland Energy’s chair and a major shareholder, has rejected suggestions that the company's activities are connected to Washington’s push for greater control over Greenland. He has said the oil project is “not related to American annexation”. The company previously faced criticism after a representative falsely told residents at a Jameson Land community meeting in June that permission had been granted to bring drilling equipment ashore. Swets subsequently acknowledged the confusion, saying: “Our enthusiasm for the project led us to communicate in a way that created confusion.” Drilling equipment arrives despite warning The controversy intensified the following month when residents of the sparsely populated area spotted a tugboat towing a barge toward the coast. The vessel unloaded about a dozen containers, according to local reports. “The goal was to get the equipment onshore at Nunap Qeqqa [Jameson Land] in connection with planned oil exploration drilling,” the Greenland government’s statement said. Danish investigative outlet Danwatch reported that the head of the shipping company confirmed the delivery was intended for Greenland Energy. The company has declined to answer questions about the operation. In a letter to shareholders issued on Thursday, Greenland Energy said: “Recent high-level meetings between project leadership and Greenlandic regulatory and oversight authorities have been constructive, and we continue to be encouraged by the progress being made toward the remaining approvals required for drilling.” The company added that, following those discussions, it now intends to drill one well initially rather than two. Environmental concerns complicate Greenland's decision Greenland’s elected authorities now face a difficult decision over the proposed drilling operation. The territory is semi-autonomous but remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and decisions concerning Greenland’s natural resources are controlled by its local government. Granting permission for oil exploration could expose the government to criticism because the planned drilling appears to be located within a conservation area protected under the Ramsar Convention on wetlands. On the other hand, rejecting the project could potentially create another point of tension with the Trump administration, with some observers concerned that Washington could use the dispute to further its campaign for greater US influence over Greenland. Despite the absence of final approval, Greenland’s government said it 'would not be proportionate' to require the equipment already delivered to be removed. It added that an application for permission was still being processed. Drilling might start in October A Greenland Energy representative has reportedly said that a vessel carrying 300 shipping containers of drilling equipment is scheduled to depart Canada on 12 September. The company plans to begin drilling the wells in October, subject to the remaining regulatory approvals. Jeff Landry, the hard-right governor of Louisiana who has been appointed as Trump’s Greenland envoy, has previously suggested that Greenland could be producing oil as early as next year. The planned exploration therefore places Greenland’s environmental regulations, its control over natural resources and the Trump administration’s ambitions for the Arctic territory under renewed scrutiny.

Greenland warns a Trump-linked Texas oil company after drilling equipment arrives without approval, as plans advance to explore Jameson Land for oil

Greenland raises ‘strong warning’ over Trump-linked oil firm’s drilling plans

US President Donald Trump has reacted furiously after a federal appeals court upheld a ruling blocking construction of his planned White House ballroom, calling the decision "horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful" and vowing to take the fight to the Supreme Court.The 2-1 decision on Friday (Aug 7), the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit upheld an order that blocks construction and ruled that the project requires explicit approval from Congress. This sets up another potential battle before the Supreme Court over how far presidential authority extends in making major changes to the White House complex. The appeals court has paused its own ruling for two weeks, giving Trump time to ask the Supreme Court to intervene.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-appeals-court-halts-trump-s-400-million-white-house-ballroom-project-construction-1786120405850">US appeals court halts Trump's $400mn White House Ballroom project construction</a><h2>Trump calls ruling ‘horrendous’</h2>Trump reacted angrily to the decision, describing it as "horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful." The president also said he would immediately challenge the ruling before the Supreme Court. In another post on Truth Social, Trump slammed the judges appointed by his predecessor. Resorting to the nicknames he has given former President Barack Obama and Joe Biden, he slammed the “two Judges, one appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, the other by Sleepy Joe Biden” and called the decision a "National Security Threat at the highest level" and a "National Disgrace."

The split among the judges has also drawn attention. The two judges who backed the ruling were appointed by Democratic presidents, while the dissenting judge was nominated by Trump.<h2>Court says Congress must approve project</h2>The appeals court agreed with a lower court that construction of such a major addition to the White House complex cannot proceed without congressional authorisation.The judges in the majority stressed that their ruling was not about whether the ballroom itself was desirable. "This holding has nothing at all to do with whether the proposed ballroom is desirable, or not, as a matter of policy," they wrote.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-may-force-more-visa-applicants-to-make-social-media-accounts-public-under-trump-s-new-plan-1786065871292">US may force more visa applicants to make social media accounts public under Trump's new plan</a> Instead, they said the issue was whether the administration could proceed with construction while the legal challenge was being heard without first obtaining approval from Congress.Under the lower court's order, work could continue on only a limited number of structures, including underground construction.<h2>Trump demolished the East Wing for the ballroom</h2>Trump had promoted the ballroom as a way to address the White House's lack of space for large events and state dinners. Construction began last year after the historic East Wing of the White House was demolished.Work has since progressed on an underground complex, with photographs showing concrete structures beginning to rise above ground.Trump has also increasingly pointed to security infrastructure, including an underground military bunker, as part of the justification for the project.<h2>Ballroom cost has already soared</h2>Trump has repeatedly said the ballroom would be privately financed. However, media reports have indicated that taxpayer money is also being used.The White House initially put the cost at around $200 million, before raising the estimate to $400 million. Reports in June suggested the final cost could reach as much as $600 million.The ballroom is part of Trump's broader effort to leave a visible mark on Washington before his term ends in 2029. His other proposed projects include changes to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and other parks, as well as plans for a huge arch. Several of those projects have also faced legal challenges. The White House ballroom case, however, could become the first of them to reach the Supreme Court.

Trump's plan for a massive White House ballroom has suffered another legal setback after an appeals court ruled that the project needs explicit congressional approval. Trump called the decision "horrendous" and a "National Security Threat."

US President Donald Trump has reacted furiously after a federal appeals court upheld a ruling blocking construction of his planned White House ballroom, calling the decision "horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful" and vowing to take the fight to the Supreme Court. The 2-1 decision on Friday (Aug 7), the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit upheld an order that blocks construction and ruled that the project requires explicit approval from Congress. This sets up another potential battle before the Supreme Court over how far presidential authority extends in making major changes to the White House complex. The appeals court has paused its own ruling for two weeks, giving Trump time to ask the Supreme Court to intervene. Also read | US appeals court halts Trump's $400mn White House Ballroom project construction Trump calls ruling ‘horrendous’ Trump reacted angrily to the decision, describing it as "horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful." The president also said he would immediately challenge the ruling before the Supreme Court. In another post on Truth Social, Trump slammed the judges appointed by his predecessor. Resorting to the nicknames he has given former President Barack Obama and Joe Biden, he slammed the “two Judges, one appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, the other by Sleepy Joe Biden” and called the decision a "National Security Threat at the highest level" and a "National Disgrace."

Trump's plan for a massive White House ballroom has suffered another legal setback after an appeals court ruled that the project needs explicit congressional approval. Trump called the decision "horrendous" and a "National Security Threat."

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

A US federal appeals court on Friday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to halt construction of a $400 million ballroom on the site of the White House's demolished East Wing, marking a significant legal setback in a case examining the limits of presidential authority. In a 2-1 ruling, the Washington-based US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said a president does not have unilateral authority to fundamentally alter the White House without congressional approval.&nbsp;“Each President is a temporary tenant, not the owner, of the White House” and cannot fundamentally reshape it without congressional approval, the court said. The decision upheld a preliminary injunction secured by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which filed a lawsuit last year after the administration demolished the East Wing and began constructing a 90,000-square-foot (8,360-square-meter) ballroom without first obtaining authorization from Congress.&nbsp;The court's majority emphasised that decisions about major structural changes to the White House belong to Congress. "Whether or not a ​massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help," the panel majority wrote. "Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House, the People’s House, to fit a particular President’s ​desires."&nbsp;The appeals court placed its ruling on hold for 14 days, allowing the Trump administration time to seek review from the US Supreme Court. The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The National Trust for Historic Preservation also did not immediately comment. The appeal followed rulings by US District Judge Richard Leon, appointed by former President George W. Bush, who twice blocked above-ground construction while allowing underground work to continue.&nbsp;The ballroom project has been described by the administration as necessary for hosting large formal events while improving White House security. It is also one of several initiatives by Trump aimed at reshaping prominent government buildings and landmarks in Washington. In a separate legal dispute, another judge recently ruled that Trump's name had been illegally added to the exterior of the Kennedy Center and ordered it removed.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/security-can-t-be-bought-with-pakistan-turkey-deal-iran-tells-saudi-arabia-1786115733935">'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia</a><h2>National security arguments</h2>During oral arguments before the DC Circuit on June 5, Justice Department attorney Yaakov Roth argued that courts should not interfere with the privately funded ballroom project. Roth contended that the National Trust's ‘architectural preference’ should not outweigh national security concerns, asserting that the former East Wing left the president and others inside the White House vulnerable to attack.&nbsp;"They just don't want to go to Congress," responded Thaddeus Heuer, attorney for the preservation group. The majority opinion, written by Democratic-appointed judges Patricia Millett and Brad Garcia, clarified that the ruling does not permanently prohibit construction. Instead, it pauses above-ground work while the lawsuit proceeds and until congressional approval is obtained.&nbsp;“The bold assertion that the Executive can act with utter lawlessness, destroying treasured national landmarks and harming ​the interests of individuals, and that no court can stop it flouts our constitutional order,” the majority wrote. The judges also rejected the administration's national security argument, stating that ‘are not an automatic get-out-of-law-free card’. In dissent, Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, appointed by Trump during his first term, argued that the lower court had exceeded its authority.&nbsp;“The district court seized supervision of construction at the White House, and my colleagues affirm this judicial overreach,” Rao wrote. Trump has continued to defend the ballroom project despite its growing cost, which has doubled from its original estimate. In a Truth Social post in May, Trump said the increased cost reflected the expanded scope of the project, writing that ‘it is approximately twice the size, and a far higher quality, than the original proposal’ and promising ‘it will be magnificent, safe, and secure!’<h2>‘We will be immediately appealing to US Supreme Court’: Trump</h2>US President Donald Trump on Friday criticised an appeals court decision ordering a pause in construction of his White House ballroom, and promised to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. "We will be immediately appealing to the United States Supreme Court," Trump said in a post on Truth Social, describing it as "a horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful ruling" that goes against national security interests.

Federal appeals court halts Trump's $400 million White House ballroom project, ruling Congress must approve major White House changes. Read the latest court decision, legal arguments, and what comes next

A US federal appeals court on Friday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to halt construction of a $400 million ballroom on the site of the White House's demolished East Wing, marking a significant legal setback in a case examining the limits of presidential authority. In a 2-1 ruling, the Washington-based US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said a president does not have unilateral authority to fundamentally alter the White House without congressional approval. “Each President is a temporary tenant, not the owner, of the White House” and cannot fundamentally reshape it without congressional approval, the court said. The decision upheld a preliminary injunction secured by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which filed a lawsuit last year after the administration demolished the East Wing and began constructing a 90,000-square-foot (8,360-square-meter) ballroom without first obtaining authorization from Congress. The court's majority emphasised that decisions about major structural changes to the White House belong to Congress. "Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help," the panel majority wrote. "Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House, the People’s House, to fit a particular President’s desires." The appeals court placed its ruling on hold for 14 days, allowing the Trump administration time to seek review from the US Supreme Court. The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The National Trust for Historic Preservation also did not immediately comment. The appeal followed rulings by US District Judge Richard Leon, appointed by former President George W. Bush, who twice blocked above-ground construction while allowing underground work to continue. The ballroom project has been described by the administration as necessary for hosting large formal events while improving White House security. It is also one of several initiatives by Trump aimed at reshaping prominent government buildings and landmarks in Washington. In a separate legal dispute, another judge recently ruled that Trump's name had been illegally added to the exterior of the Kennedy Center and ordered it removed. Also Read: 'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia National security arguments During oral arguments before the DC Circuit on June 5, Justice Department attorney Yaakov Roth argued that courts should not interfere with the privately funded ballroom project. Roth contended that the National Trust's ‘architectural preference’ should not outweigh national security concerns, asserting that the former East Wing left the president and others inside the White House vulnerable to attack. "They just don't want to go to Congress," responded Thaddeus Heuer, attorney for the preservation group. The majority opinion, written by Democratic-appointed judges Patricia Millett and Brad Garcia, clarified that the ruling does not permanently prohibit construction. Instead, it pauses above-ground work while the lawsuit proceeds and until congressional approval is obtained. “The bold assertion that the Executive can act with utter lawlessness, destroying treasured national landmarks and harming the interests of individuals, and that no court can stop it flouts our constitutional order,” the majority wrote. The judges also rejected the administration's national security argument, stating that ‘are not an automatic get-out-of-law-free card’. In dissent, Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, appointed by Trump during his first term, argued that the lower court had exceeded its authority. “The district court seized supervision of construction at the White House, and my colleagues affirm this judicial overreach,” Rao wrote. Trump has continued to defend the ballroom project despite its growing cost, which has doubled from its original estimate. In a Truth Social post in May, Trump said the increased cost reflected the expanded scope of the project, writing that ‘it is approximately twice the size, and a far higher quality, than the original proposal’ and promising ‘it will be magnificent, safe, and secure!’ ‘We will be immediately appealing to US Supreme Court’: Trump US President Donald Trump on Friday criticised an appeals court decision ordering a pause in construction of his White House ballroom, and promised to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. "We will be immediately appealing to the United States Supreme Court," Trump said in a post on Truth Social, describing it as "a horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful ruling" that goes against national security interests.

President Trump's $400 million White House ballroom project has been halted by a federal appeals court, which ruled Congress must approve major White House redesigns before construction proceeds

US appeals court halts Trump's $400 million White House Ballroom project construction; Trump says, 'Will be appealing to US Supreme Court'

The Trump administration has suffered its 21st courtroom setback this year in its effort to compel states to hand over voter registration records, with a federal judge ruling that states are not legally required to provide the requested voter rolls to the federal government. As Republicans defend narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, the administration has intensified efforts to increase federal oversight of election administration.&nbsp;President Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that widespread noncitizen voting benefits the Democratic Party. However, multiple state audits and independent studies have consistently concluded that noncitizen voting remains extremely rare. A Reuters investigation found that only 129 people have been prosecuted for noncitizen voting since it became a federal crime in 1996. According to the report, most cases resulted from voter confusion or communication errors with election officials rather than organized voter fraud.&nbsp;Federal courts have repeatedly ruled that the US Constitution grants states primary authority over administering federal elections and that existing federal voting laws do not require states to provide unredacted voter registration records to the Justice Department. "If the Department disagrees with Congress’s judgment ​as to the records necessary to carry out its enforcement duties ... it needs to lodge that objection with Congress," US District Judge Randolph Moss, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, wrote on Thursday ​in dismissing a Justice Department bid to obtain unredacted voter rolls from Washington, DC.&nbsp;The Justice Department has filed lawsuits against more than two dozen states that declined requests to provide voter rolls containing personal information, including dates of birth and partial Social Security numbers. Alongside its legal efforts, the administration has warned states that certain federal disaster funds could be withheld if they do not use the federal SAVE database to verify voter citizenship. It has also pursued policies aimed at limiting eligibility for mail-in voting. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon said in a statement on Monday: "Ensuring that only eligible citizens vote is a core function of government, and ​states have an obligation to maintain accurate voter rolls."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-taiwan-s-president-lai-ching-te-was-taken-to-a-secret-command-centre-during-war-drills-1786102083729">Why Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te was taken to a secret command centre during war drills</a><h2>Justice Department appeals court losses</h2>Since January, federal judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents have ruled against the Justice Department in 21 cases involving voter roll requests. Those rulings include decisions from states led by both parties, such as California and West Virginia. Nine similar lawsuits remain pending, leaving open the possibility of future victories for the administration. The Justice Department has appealed 16 of its losses. One appeal has already been rejected after the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the department's lawsuit against Michigan on June 24. The department has requested a full review by the court's active judges.&nbsp;The administration could also seek review from the US Supreme Court, where conservative justices hold a 6-3 majority, although there is no guarantee the court would agree to hear the cases. In July, Harmeet Dhillon sent letters to election officials in all 50 states warning that they could face criminal charges if they knowingly allowed non-US citizens to remain on voter registration lists. The Department of Homeland Security also announced that certain disaster relief funds could be withheld from states that fail to use the SAVE immigration database to verify voter eligibility.&nbsp;Separately, the Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to allow enforcement of an executive order directing DHS to compile lists of US citizens eligible to vote in each state while restricting mail ballots to voters appearing on those lists. A federal judge blocked the order in several states, ruling that federal agencies currently lack the capability to accurately create such voter lists. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled.<h2>Judge calls effort a 'fishing expedition'</h2>Justice Department attorneys have argued that comparing state voter rolls with the federal SAVE database would help identify non-US citizens who may be registered to vote. Democrats and voting rights organizations have questioned the reliability of SAVE data for determining citizenship status. In a June 27 ruling involving Pennsylvania, US District Judge Cathy Bissoon criticised the federal government's request.&nbsp;In a June 27 order denying the ​administration's bid to obtain Pennsylvania's voter list, Pittsburgh-based US District Judge Cathy Bissoon, an Obama appointee, said the federal government was on a "fishing expedition" to “advance unsubstantiated claims ​of non-citizen voting.” The Justice Department has appealed that ruling before the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which has not yet scheduled arguments.&nbsp;A ​Justice Department spokesperson cited a July 17 Department of Homeland Security finding that more than 250,000 potential noncitizens were registered to vote ​in four states, as well as New Jersey's disclosure that 400 noncitizens cast ballots after being mistakenly registered between 2023 and 2024. The Department of Homeland Security did not specify how many of the 250,000 individuals were confirmed noncitizens, how many actually voted or how the estimate was calculated. New Jersey officials also said there was no evidence the mistakenly cast ballots affected the outcome of any election.

The Trump administration faces its 21st courtroom loss over state voter rolls as federal judges rule states are not obligated to share voter records. The Justice Department continues appeals ahead of the midterm elections

The Trump administration has suffered its 21st courtroom setback this year in its effort to compel states to hand over voter registration records, with a federal judge ruling that states are not legally required to provide the requested voter rolls to the federal government. As Republicans defend narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, the administration has intensified efforts to increase federal oversight of election administration. President Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that widespread noncitizen voting benefits the Democratic Party. However, multiple state audits and independent studies have consistently concluded that noncitizen voting remains extremely rare. A Reuters investigation found that only 129 people have been prosecuted for noncitizen voting since it became a federal crime in 1996. According to the report, most cases resulted from voter confusion or communication errors with election officials rather than organized voter fraud. Federal courts have repeatedly ruled that the US Constitution grants states primary authority over administering federal elections and that existing federal voting laws do not require states to provide unredacted voter registration records to the Justice Department. "If the Department disagrees with Congress’s judgment as to the records necessary to carry out its enforcement duties ... it needs to lodge that objection with Congress," US District Judge Randolph Moss, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, wrote on Thursday in dismissing a Justice Department bid to obtain unredacted voter rolls from Washington, DC. The Justice Department has filed lawsuits against more than two dozen states that declined requests to provide voter rolls containing personal information, including dates of birth and partial Social Security numbers. Alongside its legal efforts, the administration has warned states that certain federal disaster funds could be withheld if they do not use the federal SAVE database to verify voter citizenship. It has also pursued policies aimed at limiting eligibility for mail-in voting. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon said in a statement on Monday: "Ensuring that only eligible citizens vote is a core function of government, and states have an obligation to maintain accurate voter rolls." Also Read: Why Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te was taken to a secret command centre during war drills Justice Department appeals court losses Since January, federal judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents have ruled against the Justice Department in 21 cases involving voter roll requests. Those rulings include decisions from states led by both parties, such as California and West Virginia. Nine similar lawsuits remain pending, leaving open the possibility of future victories for the administration. The Justice Department has appealed 16 of its losses. One appeal has already been rejected after the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the department's lawsuit against Michigan on June 24. The department has requested a full review by the court's active judges. The administration could also seek review from the US Supreme Court, where conservative justices hold a 6-3 majority, although there is no guarantee the court would agree to hear the cases. In July, Harmeet Dhillon sent letters to election officials in all 50 states warning that they could face criminal charges if they knowingly allowed non-US citizens to remain on voter registration lists. The Department of Homeland Security also announced that certain disaster relief funds could be withheld from states that fail to use the SAVE immigration database to verify voter eligibility. Separately, the Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to allow enforcement of an executive order directing DHS to compile lists of US citizens eligible to vote in each state while restricting mail ballots to voters appearing on those lists. A federal judge blocked the order in several states, ruling that federal agencies currently lack the capability to accurately create such voter lists. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled. Judge calls effort a 'fishing expedition' Justice Department attorneys have argued that comparing state voter rolls with the federal SAVE database would help identify non-US citizens who may be registered to vote. Democrats and voting rights organizations have questioned the reliability of SAVE data for determining citizenship status. In a June 27 ruling involving Pennsylvania, US District Judge Cathy Bissoon criticised the federal government's request. In a June 27 order denying the administration's bid to obtain Pennsylvania's voter list, Pittsburgh-based US District Judge Cathy Bissoon, an Obama appointee, said the federal government was on a "fishing expedition" to “advance unsubstantiated claims of non-citizen voting.” The Justice Department has appealed that ruling before the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which has not yet scheduled arguments. A Justice Department spokesperson cited a July 17 Department of Homeland Security finding that more than 250,000 potential noncitizens were registered to vote in four states, as well as New Jersey's disclosure that 400 noncitizens cast ballots after being mistakenly registered between 2023 and 2024. The Department of Homeland Security did not specify how many of the 250,000 individuals were confirmed noncitizens, how many actually voted or how the estimate was calculated. New Jersey officials also said there was no evidence the mistakenly cast ballots affected the outcome of any election.

The Trump administration suffered its 21st court defeat in efforts to obtain state voter rolls, as judges ruled states are not required to share election records with the federal government

21 losses and counting: Trump administration's voter roll strategy faces fresh defeat ahead of midterms

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to expand social media vetting for more categories of US visa applicants, including foreign journalists, as part of a broader tightening of immigration screening.According to a report by The Daily Signal, which was reposted by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X, the US State Department is considering new requirements that would require certain visa applicants to make their social media profiles public to facilitate government scrutiny during the visa process.<h2>What is changing?</h2>The report, which cites an internal State Department memo, says applicants covered under the expanded policy would be required to change the privacy settings of their social media accounts to "public" or "open." The expanded vetting is expected to apply to foreign media representatives and some visa applicants from Canada and Mexico.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/born-in-the-usa-trump-targets-birth-tourism-with-new-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-made-a-joke-out-of-it-1786060006452">Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order</a>Notably, the United States already requires applicants for several visa categories, including student visas, to make their social media accounts publicly accessible as part of the screening process.<h2>State Department responds</h2>Without confirming the reported changes, the State Department said it regularly reviews its visa screening procedures to safeguard US national security. "The department is constantly reviewing and evaluating screening and vetting procedures worldwide to ensure that our visa process upholds the highest standards for US national security and public safety," a State Department spokesperson told AFP.The spokesperson added that online screening helps determine whether applicants qualify for visas under US law and whether they pose any security risks. "Online presence vetting is about applicants demonstrating their eligibility to receive a visa under US law and ensuring that no individual poses a risk to the safety and security of the United States," the spokesperson said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/planning-to-study-or-work-in-the-us-one-missing-document-could-now-cost-indians-their-us-visa-or-green-card-1785996613542">Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card</a><h2>Part of Trump's tougher immigration policy</h2>The reported move comes as President Donald Trump continues to tighten immigration rules after returning to office. The administration has pursued stricter border controls, stepped up deportations of undocumented migrants and imposed new restrictions on legal immigration.Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly defended the tougher approach, saying, "A visa is a privilege, not a right."<h2>New limits on students and journalists</h2>The reported expansion of social media checks follows another recent immigration policy change affecting temporary visa holders.Last month, the Trump administration finalised rules imposing stricter limits on how long foreign students and journalists can remain in the United States.Under the new framework, international students will generally be admitted for the duration of their academic programme, up to a maximum of four years. Foreign journalists, meanwhile, will be limited to stays of 240 days, or roughly eight months, although they will be able to apply for extensions of a similar duration.

The Trump admin is reportedly considering expanding social media vetting to more US visa applicants, including foreign journalists. Under the proposal, affected applicants may have to make their social media accounts public to allow government scrutiny as part of the visa screening process.

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to expand social media vetting for more categories of US visa applicants, including foreign journalists, as part of a broader tightening of immigration screening. According to a report by The Daily Signal, which was reposted by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X, the US State Department is considering new requirements that would require certain visa applicants to make their social media profiles public to facilitate government scrutiny during the visa process. What is changing? The report, which cites an internal State Department memo, says applicants covered under the expanded policy would be required to change the privacy settings of their social media accounts to "public" or "open." The expanded vetting is expected to apply to foreign media representatives and some visa applicants from Canada and Mexico. Also read | Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order Notably, the United States already requires applicants for several visa categories, including student visas, to make their social media accounts publicly accessible as part of the screening process. State Department responds Without confirming the reported changes, the State Department said it regularly reviews its visa screening procedures to safeguard US national security. "The department is constantly reviewing and evaluating screening and vetting procedures worldwide to ensure that our visa process upholds the highest standards for US national security and public safety," a State Department spokesperson told AFP. The spokesperson added that online screening helps determine whether applicants qualify for visas under US law and whether they pose any security risks. "Online presence vetting is about applicants demonstrating their eligibility to receive a visa under US law and ensuring that no individual poses a risk to the safety and security of the United States," the spokesperson said. Also read | Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card Part of Trump's tougher immigration policy The reported move comes as President Donald Trump continues to tighten immigration rules after returning to office. The administration has pursued stricter border controls, stepped up deportations of undocumented migrants and imposed new restrictions on legal immigration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly defended the tougher approach, saying, "A visa is a privilege, not a right." New limits on students and journalists The reported expansion of social media checks follows another recent immigration policy change affecting temporary visa holders. Last month, the Trump administration finalised rules imposing stricter limits on how long foreign students and journalists can remain in the United States. Under the new framework, international students will generally be admitted for the duration of their academic programme, up to a maximum of four years. Foreign journalists, meanwhile, will be limited to stays of 240 days, or roughly eight months, although they will be able to apply for extensions of a similar duration.

The Trump admin is reportedly considering expanding social media vetting to more US visa applicants, including foreign journalists. Under the proposal, affected applicants may have to make their social media accounts public to allow government scrutiny as part of the visa screening process.

US may force more visa applicants to make social media accounts public under Trump's new plan

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) signed a fresh executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, targeting what his administration describes as "birth tourism" and other categories of foreign nationals whose children could automatically acquire US citizenship.The move marks Trump's latest attempt to narrow the scope of the constitutional right, weeks after the US Supreme Court blocked an earlier effort to end automatic citizenship for children born to undocumented migrants and temporary visa holders.<h2>What is Trump's new order?</h2>Speaking at the White House on Thursday, Trump accused people of exploiting birthright citizenship by entering the United States on tourist visas solely to give birth. "They've taken birthright citizenship, and they've made a joke out of it," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "We're making adjustments because it's very unfair," he added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/planning-to-study-or-work-in-the-us-one-missing-document-could-now-cost-indians-their-us-visa-or-green-card-1785996613542">Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card</a>According to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the executive order is intended to prevent citizenship benefits from being extended to children born to individuals who travel to the US primarily to give birth.Miller also said the order would cover children of members of "foreign terrorist organizations" and "large categories of people who lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments."He said the measure "ensures that large numbers of people who wrongly (would) be getting birthright citizenship will no longer be eligible for those benefits."<h2>Why is birthright citizenship controversial?</h2>Birthright citizenship is guaranteed under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, which states that "all persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."There are already limited exceptions. Children born to foreign diplomats, for example, do not automatically receive US citizenship because their parents are not considered subject to US jurisdiction.US immigration law also already allows consular officers to deny visas if they believe an applicant's primary purpose for travelling is to give birth in the country.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-trump-s-helicopter-nearly-collide-with-a-passenger-jet-us-launches-probe-1785981732847">Did Trump's helicopter nearly collide with a passenger jet? US launches probe</a><h2>Supreme Court blocked Trump's earlier attempt</h2>Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born to parents who were in the US illegally or on temporary visas.Lower courts halted the policy, and in late June the US Supreme Court ruled against the administration, reaffirming constitutional protections for birthright citizenship. Trump called that decision "very unfortunate."His administration had argued that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors.

US President Donald Trump has signed a new executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship by targeting so called “birth tourism”. The move comes weeks after the Supreme Court blocked his earlier attempt to limit automatic US citizenship for children born on American soil.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) signed a fresh executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, targeting what his administration describes as "birth tourism" and other categories of foreign nationals whose children could automatically acquire US citizenship. The move marks Trump's latest attempt to narrow the scope of the constitutional right, weeks after the US Supreme Court blocked an earlier effort to end automatic citizenship for children born to undocumented migrants and temporary visa holders. What is Trump's new order? Speaking at the White House on Thursday, Trump accused people of exploiting birthright citizenship by entering the United States on tourist visas solely to give birth. "They've taken birthright citizenship, and they've made a joke out of it," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "We're making adjustments because it's very unfair," he added. Also read | Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card According to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the executive order is intended to prevent citizenship benefits from being extended to children born to individuals who travel to the US primarily to give birth. Miller also said the order would cover children of members of "foreign terrorist organizations" and "large categories of people who lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments." He said the measure "ensures that large numbers of people who wrongly (would) be getting birthright citizenship will no longer be eligible for those benefits." Why is birthright citizenship controversial? Birthright citizenship is guaranteed under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, which states that "all persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." There are already limited exceptions. Children born to foreign diplomats, for example, do not automatically receive US citizenship because their parents are not considered subject to US jurisdiction. US immigration law also already allows consular officers to deny visas if they believe an applicant's primary purpose for travelling is to give birth in the country. Also read | Did Trump's helicopter nearly collide with a passenger jet? US launches probe Supreme Court blocked Trump's earlier attempt Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born to parents who were in the US illegally or on temporary visas. Lower courts halted the policy, and in late June the US Supreme Court ruled against the administration, reaffirming constitutional protections for birthright citizenship. Trump called that decision "very unfortunate." His administration had argued that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors.

US President Donald Trump has signed a new executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship by targeting so called “birth tourism”. The move comes weeks after the Supreme Court blocked his earlier attempt to limit automatic US citizenship for children born on American soil.

Born in the USA? Trump targets 'birth tourism' with new birthright citizenship executive order

West Asia remains on edge as Iran and Oman move closer to finalizing a Strait of Hormuz shipping agreement while tensions continue to rise across the region. Israel has launched fresh strikes on southern Lebanon, with the IDF citing Hezbollah ceasefire violations. At the same time, Iran has reportedly warned Gulf nations that their energy infrastructure could become targets if they fail to persuade the United States to halt military action.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has reportedly urged U.S. President Donald Trump to delay military action and prioritize diplomacy. Meanwhile, Washington continues to express frustration over stalled talks with Tehran, even as negotiations over maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz continue through Oman.

Iran Warns Gulf States | Israel Strikes Lebanon as Hormuz Talks Continue | West Asia Crisis

The U.S. Department of war is reportedly drafting a revised classified nuclear strategy led by defence planners to give the Commander-in-Chief new options in regional conflicts. The policy focuses on integrating lower-yield tactical nuclear weapons to defend allies from attacks by Russia or China. We break down what tactical nukes are, and what this strategy means for NATO allies.

Trump Goes Nuclear, Prepares for War with China, Russia | GRAVITAS 

Donald Trump's military strategy is facing renewed scrutiny as concerns grow over U.S. weapons stockpiles and defense production. Questions are mounting over whether Washington can simultaneously support Ukraine, maintain pressure on Iran, deter China, and reassure allies without overstretching its military resources. As debates intensify over Patriot missile supplies, logistics, and industrial capacity, analysts warn that inventory shortages could become a major strategic challenge for the United States.

Trump's War Strategy Under Fire | U.S. Weapons Shortage Raises Questions Over Ukraine, Iran & China

A growing rift has reportedly emerged between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the future of Gaza. Netanyahu has rejected proposals involving an Israeli troop withdrawal and Hamas disarmament, raising fresh doubts over ceasefire negotiations and the prospects for a lasting peace. The disagreement highlights deep divisions over the next phase of the Gaza conflict and regional security.

Benjamin Netanyahu Refuses to Withdraw Troops from Gaza, Rejects Hamas Disarmament Proposal

Reports claim U.S. President Donald Trump clashed with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over concerns about shrinking U.S. munitions stockpiles amid ongoing military operations. According to reports, Trump sought answers over missile shortages and the Pentagon's preparedness, while the White House has disputed accounts of a major confrontation and insists the United States has sufficient weapons supplies.

Donald Trump Reportedly Clashed with Pete Hegseth Over the Shortage of Munitions 

The United States is reportedly continuing discussions on allowing Ukraine to produce Patriot interceptor missiles, despite President Donald Trump expressing reservations about transferring such advanced defense technology.

According to Reuters, U.S. officials, defense manufacturers, and Ukrainian representatives are exploring several options, including producing selected Patriot missile components for final assembly in Germany, integrating Ukraine into existing European production programs, or manufacturing a lower-cost PAC-3 interceptor variant.

Trump has emphasized the need to protect sensitive U.S. defense technology, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy continues to call for more air defense systems as Russia intensifies missile and drone attacks.

U.S. Continues Patriot Missile Talks With Ukraine Despite Trump's Concerns | Patriot Missile Deal

Iran and Oman are reportedly close to finalizing a new framework governing commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most strategically important maritime chokepoints.

According to reports, the proposed arrangement would route inbound vessels through Iranian territorial waters and outbound traffic through Omani waters, with no tolls during an initial 60-day period. The agreement could significantly increase Iran's role in managing shipping through the strait and reshape regional geopolitics.

The United States has not officially responded to the reports, while Vice President JD Vance has warned that negotiations with Iran remain complex. Analysts say any agreement may only provide a temporary solution as political divisions continue within both Iran and the United States.

Iran-Oman Near Strait of Hormuz Shipping Deal | Will the U.S. Accept the New Framework?

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) are investigating an air safety incident involving U.S. President Donald Trump's military helicopter, Marine One, and a commercial passenger jet near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

According to the FAA's preliminary review, the two aircraft experienced a momentary loss of separation shortly after the passenger plane took off. Officials said both aircraft then continued moving away from each other, and there was no immediate danger.

The White House has maintained that President Trump was never at risk, while aviation authorities continue to examine the circumstances surrounding the incident. The investigation is expected to determine whether additional safety measures are needed around one of the nation's busiest and most tightly controlled airspaces.

FAA Investigates Trump’s Marine One After Close Call With Passenger Jet Near Washington

US authorities have launched an investigation after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came too close to a commercial passenger aircraft while flying over Washington this week, though the White House has insisted that the president "was never in danger."The incident occurred on Tuesday (Aug 4) as Trump was travelling aboard the presidential helicopter to Joint Base Andrews to board Air Force One for a trip to California.According to a report by The New York Times, citing two people familiar with the matter, Marine One came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft after what was described as garbled communication with air traffic controllers.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-administration-refunds-100-billion-in-tariffs-after-supreme-court-ruling-1785977857498">Trump administration refunds $100 billion in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling</a><h2>NTSB confirms investigation</h2>The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed it has opened an investigation into what aviation authorities describe as a "loss of separation" event."The NTSB is investigating a reported loss of separation event between Marine One and a commercial aircraft departing DCA (Washington National Airport) that occurred on August 4," the agency said in a statement.The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also confirmed that air traffic controllers were communicating with both aircraft at the time."The air traffic controller was in contact with both the commercial pilot and Marine One pilot during the loss of separation," the FAA said. The agency added that it is reviewing the incident and will implement any corrective measures if necessary.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bangladesh-says-sheikh-hasina-s-india-media-appearance-hurt-ties-calls-it-an-affront-to-sovereignty-1785977377689">'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference</a><h2>White House: Trump was never at risk</h2>White House spokesperson Kush Desai dismissed suggestions that the president faced any danger during the flight. "Marine One flights are piloted by some of the best aviators in the world, and at no point was the president in harm's way," Desai told AFP.The FAA echoed that assessment, saying, "The President was never in danger."<h2>What happened?</h2>According to The Wall Street Journal, aviation safety protocols typically require aircraft to remain at least 1.5 miles apart horizontally and 500 feet apart vertically in situations like this.The newspaper reported that the incident took place at around 2:30 pm local time, when an American Airlines Embraer E-170 operated by regional carrier Envoy Air departed from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Marine One was en route to Joint Base Andrews at the time.<h2>Comes after heightened safety concerns</h2>The reported near miss comes as aviation safety around Washington National Airport remains under intense scrutiny.The FAA has tightened flight procedures around the airport following the deadly January 2025 collision between a US Army Black Hawk helicopter and a commercial airliner, which killed all 67 people on board.Investigators will now seek to determine what led to the latest loss of separation and whether any procedural changes are needed to prevent similar incidents in the future.

US authorities are investigating after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft over Washington. What happened? Here's what we know.

US authorities have launched an investigation after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came too close to a commercial passenger aircraft while flying over Washington this week, though the White House has insisted that the president "was never in danger." The incident occurred on Tuesday (Aug 4) as Trump was travelling aboard the presidential helicopter to Joint Base Andrews to board Air Force One for a trip to California. According to a report by The New York Times, citing two people familiar with the matter, Marine One came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft after what was described as garbled communication with air traffic controllers. Also read | Trump administration refunds $100 billion in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling NTSB confirms investigation The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed it has opened an investigation into what aviation authorities describe as a "loss of separation" event. "The NTSB is investigating a reported loss of separation event between Marine One and a commercial aircraft departing DCA (Washington National Airport) that occurred on August 4," the agency said in a statement. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also confirmed that air traffic controllers were communicating with both aircraft at the time. "The air traffic controller was in contact with both the commercial pilot and Marine One pilot during the loss of separation," the FAA said. The agency added that it is reviewing the incident and will implement any corrective measures if necessary. Also read | 'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference White House: Trump was never at risk White House spokesperson Kush Desai dismissed suggestions that the president faced any danger during the flight. "Marine One flights are piloted by some of the best aviators in the world, and at no point was the president in harm's way," Desai told AFP. The FAA echoed that assessment, saying, "The President was never in danger." What happened? According to The Wall Street Journal, aviation safety protocols typically require aircraft to remain at least 1.5 miles apart horizontally and 500 feet apart vertically in situations like this. The newspaper reported that the incident took place at around 2:30 pm local time, when an American Airlines Embraer E-170 operated by regional carrier Envoy Air departed from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Marine One was en route to Joint Base Andrews at the time. Comes after heightened safety concerns The reported near miss comes as aviation safety around Washington National Airport remains under intense scrutiny. The FAA has tightened flight procedures around the airport following the deadly January 2025 collision between a US Army Black Hawk helicopter and a commercial airliner, which killed all 67 people on board. Investigators will now seek to determine what led to the latest loss of separation and whether any procedural changes are needed to prevent similar incidents in the future.

US authorities are investigating after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft over Washington. What happened? Here's what we know.

Did Trump's helicopter nearly collide with a passenger jet? US launches probe

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday renewed claims about election integrity during a primetime address, citing the Michigan primary as an example of what he called election-related misconduct. Trump was visibly displeased at the victory of progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed and called him a "communist loser" who hates “Jews and Israel".Trump called the victory of El-Sayed good news for Republicans: “El-Sayed, a Communist loser who hates Jews and Israel, is the projected winner in his race with the Socialist. As usual, the Polls were way off on this one. She was not expected to do nearly as well as she did. Now, the Dumocrats crazy policies will only get worse!”Trump alleged that Michigan-based “Get Out The Voter” organisation attempted to submit fraudulent voter registration forms. Trump said he directed federal authorities to investigate the poll. “Tonight, I’m asking the FBI director to ensure that the matter is fully investigated and to work with the Department of Justice to prosecute those responsible for any crimes,” said Trump.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/sajeeb-wazed-bangladesh-another-pakistan-failed-state-1785944342583">Sajeeb Wazed raises Indian security concerns, calls Bangladesh a 'failed state'</a>He further doubled down on his claims and called Michigan the most corrupt voting area in the United States, “Wayne County (Detroit) in Michigan is one of the most corrupt voting areas in the United States, if not the World. It is strictly Third World! Miracles happen in Wayne County, including more votes being cast than there are voters, by a lot. Therefore, the Communist, who is not liked in Detroit, is potentially in “Vote Counter” trouble," wrote Trump in a Truth Social post.His post came soon before the Associated Press called the race between El-Sayed, who had held a narrow lead over US Rep. Haley Stevens for several hours. El-Sayed had 48.5% of the vote, compared with 47.5% for Stevens.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Donald Trump called Abdul El-Sayed a "communist loser" after the Michigan primary and urged the FBI to investigate alleged voter fraud in the election.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday renewed claims about election integrity during a primetime address, citing the Michigan primary as an example of what he called election-related misconduct. Trump was visibly displeased at the victory of progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed and called him a "communist loser" who hates “Jews and Israel". Trump called the victory of El-Sayed good news for Republicans: “El-Sayed, a Communist loser who hates Jews and Israel, is the projected winner in his race with the Socialist. As usual, the Polls were way off on this one. She was not expected to do nearly as well as she did. Now, the Dumocrats crazy policies will only get worse!” Trump alleged that Michigan-based “Get Out The Voter” organisation attempted to submit fraudulent voter registration forms. Trump said he directed federal authorities to investigate the poll. “Tonight, I’m asking the FBI director to ensure that the matter is fully investigated and to work with the Department of Justice to prosecute those responsible for any crimes,” said Trump. Also Read: Sajeeb Wazed raises Indian security concerns, calls Bangladesh a 'failed state' He further doubled down on his claims and called Michigan the most corrupt voting area in the United States, “Wayne County (Detroit) in Michigan is one of the most corrupt voting areas in the United States, if not the World. It is strictly Third World! Miracles happen in Wayne County, including more votes being cast than there are voters, by a lot. Therefore, the Communist, who is not liked in Detroit, is potentially in “Vote Counter” trouble," wrote Trump in a Truth Social post. His post came soon before the Associated Press called the race between El-Sayed, who had held a narrow lead over US Rep. Haley Stevens for several hours. El-Sayed had 48.5% of the vote, compared with 47.5% for Stevens.

Donald Trump called Abdul El-Sayed a "communist loser" after the Michigan primary and urged the FBI to investigate alleged voter fraud in the election.

Donald Trump calls Abdul El-Sayed a 'communist loser', seeks FBI probe into Michigan primary

President Donald Trump’s promises of an economic "golden age" collide with a more modest reality, as second-quarter 2026 GDP growth registers at a slow 1.5%, stubborn inflation hovers around 3.5%, and high consumer costs challenge the administration's optimistic narrative.


Trump's 'golden economy' claim faces reality check

The United States is not actively preparing or rehearsing for a ground invasion of Cuba, according to statements from senior military leadership like U.S. Southern Command. However, heightened aggressive rhetoric from the White House, a strict oil import blockade, and routine military contingency planning have fueled widespread speculation.


US president increases spies in Cuba; is the US mulling invasion?

President Donald Trump's economic strategy is facing fresh scrutiny as his administration continues using tariffs and sanctions to pressure trading partners and geopolitical rivals.

New tariffs of up to 12.5% on imports from 60 countries are now facing legal challenges, with multiple US states arguing that the administration exceeded its authority. Economists also suggest that American businesses and consumers—not foreign exporters—are paying much of the cost through higher prices.

At the same time, US sanctions on Russia have pushed Moscow to expand alternative payment systems, shadow shipping networks, and trade partnerships with countries such as China and India.

Trump's Tariffs & Sanctions Under Fire | Are US Economic Pressure Tactics Failing?

A US federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration's policy freezing green card applications from 75 countries was unlawful, dealing a significant setback to President Donald Trump's immigration agenda.

The ruling, issued by US District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington, D.C., found that the State Department's "public charge" policy exceeded the authority granted under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Introduced earlier this year by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the policy had largely halted immigrant visa processing for applicants from countries including Nigeria, Colombia, Russia, and Egypt.

The policy mainly affected family-sponsored immigrant visa applicants and some employment-based green card applicants. While the administration argued that the measure was intended to prevent immigrants from relying on public assistance, critics said it effectively blocked applications without proper individual review.

US Judge Blocks Trump Green Card Freeze | Major Setback for Trump's Immigration Policy

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump