More than a year after an Air India Boeing 787 crashed in Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025, killing 260 people shortly after takeoff, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has told the Supreme Court that it expects to complete the investigation and submit a draft final report by October this year.&nbsp;The AAIB also informed the court that there is no need for a court monitored inquiry, stating that the investigation is being conducted in line with India's obligations under international aviation treaties.&nbsp;In its counter affidavit, the AAIB said the law governing aircraft accident investigations gives it exclusive authority to probe such incidents and does not allow the disclosure of protected investigation material.&nbsp;Citing Rule 17 of the 2025 Rules, the agency said witness statements, communications between people involved in operating the aircraft, medical and private information, cockpit voice recordings and transcripts, air traffic control recordings, cockpit image recordings and investigators' opinions cannot be made public unless the Central Government decides that disclosure is necessary despite its impact on the ongoing investigation or future inquiries.&nbsp;The bureau also opposed the petitioners' request to provide cockpit voice recordings to an external committee.&nbsp;"The Rules, 2025, contain crucial and mandatory safeguards relating to the confidentiality and integrity of investigative material. Rule 17(5) specifically and separately provides that the audio content of cockpit voice recordings shall not be disclosed to the public. This is an absolute statutory prohibition", the affidavit said.&nbsp;The AAIB said these safeguards are essential to ensure witnesses cooperate freely and investigators can carry out an independent safety probe. It also submitted that only the Central Government has the authority to decide whether protected material should be disclosed, and no such decision has been taken in the present case.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-launches-fresh-strikes-after-reinstating-naval-blockade-as-battle-for-hormuz-intensifies-1784114578777">US launches fresh strikes after reinstating naval blockade of Iran as battle for Hormuz intensifies</a>&nbsp;"These protections serve a critical purpose: they preserve the candour of witnesses, the independence of investigators, the integrity of the no-blame investigation process. If witnesses know that their statements may be disclosed. They will become guarded or unwilling to cooperate, thereby defeating the very purpose of the safety investigation", the response added.&nbsp;The affidavit was filed in response to three writ petitions, including one filed by Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, father of Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, who was one of the pilots of the flight.&nbsp;The AAIB also referred to previous investigations to support its projected timeline. It said the Ahmedabad crash, which claimed 241 lives on board and involved victims from multiple countries, is significantly more complex than earlier accidents. The bureau cited investigations into Japan Airlines Flight 516, Jeju Air Flight 2216, the Potomac River mid-air collision and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 to argue that major international aircraft accident investigations routinely take one year or more to complete.

The AAIB has told the Supreme Court it expects to submit the draft final report on the Air India Flight AI-171 crash in Ahmedabad by October while opposing the release of cockpit voice recordings, citing statutory confidentiality provisions.

More than a year after an Air India Boeing 787 crashed in Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025, killing 260 people shortly after takeoff, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has told the Supreme Court that it expects to complete the investigation and submit a draft final report by October this year. The AAIB also informed the court that there is no need for a court monitored inquiry, stating that the investigation is being conducted in line with India's obligations under international aviation treaties. In its counter affidavit, the AAIB said the law governing aircraft accident investigations gives it exclusive authority to probe such incidents and does not allow the disclosure of protected investigation material. Citing Rule 17 of the 2025 Rules, the agency said witness statements, communications between people involved in operating the aircraft, medical and private information, cockpit voice recordings and transcripts, air traffic control recordings, cockpit image recordings and investigators' opinions cannot be made public unless the Central Government decides that disclosure is necessary despite its impact on the ongoing investigation or future inquiries. The bureau also opposed the petitioners' request to provide cockpit voice recordings to an external committee. "The Rules, 2025, contain crucial and mandatory safeguards relating to the confidentiality and integrity of investigative material. Rule 17(5) specifically and separately provides that the audio content of cockpit voice recordings shall not be disclosed to the public. This is an absolute statutory prohibition", the affidavit said. The AAIB said these safeguards are essential to ensure witnesses cooperate freely and investigators can carry out an independent safety probe. It also submitted that only the Central Government has the authority to decide whether protected material should be disclosed, and no such decision has been taken in the present case. Also Read: US launches fresh strikes after reinstating naval blockade of Iran as battle for Hormuz intensifies "These protections serve a critical purpose: they preserve the candour of witnesses, the independence of investigators, the integrity of the no-blame investigation process. If witnesses know that their statements may be disclosed. They will become guarded or unwilling to cooperate, thereby defeating the very purpose of the safety investigation", the response added. The affidavit was filed in response to three writ petitions, including one filed by Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, father of Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, who was one of the pilots of the flight. The AAIB also referred to previous investigations to support its projected timeline. It said the Ahmedabad crash, which claimed 241 lives on board and involved victims from multiple countries, is significantly more complex than earlier accidents. The bureau cited investigations into Japan Airlines Flight 516, Jeju Air Flight 2216, the Potomac River mid-air collision and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 to argue that major international aircraft accident investigations routinely take one year or more to complete.

The AAIB has told the Supreme Court it expects to submit the draft final report on the Air India Flight AI-171 crash in Ahmedabad by October while opposing the release of cockpit voice recordings, citing statutory confidentiality provisions.

Ahmedabad Air India crash probe draft report likely by October, AAIB opposes release of cockpit recordings

The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has written to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), flagging discrepancies in the preliminary report on the Air India Flight AI171 crash. Highlighting that the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) may not be linked to the fuel interruption and raising doubts on the timeline, the FIP has called for fresh simulator tests to verify the sequence of events. The issue has drawn attention to a little-known aircraft safety system, which may provide investigators with clues on what led to the deadly crash that claimed the lives of 260 people onboard and on the ground, leaving just one surviving passenger.<h2>What is a Ram Air Turbine (RAT)?</h2>A Ram Air Turbine (RAT) is an emergency backup power system installed on several commercial aircraft, including the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which was involved in the crash in Ahmedabad last year. The RAT, which is a small wind-driven turbine, is connected to a hydraulic pump or an electric generator. It is deployed automatically if a plane experiences a major loss of electrical power, hydraulic power, or engine-generated power.Once deployed, the RAT can provide enough power to operate critical flight controls, instruments, communication systems and other essential functions needed for pilots to maintain control of the aircraft and attempt a landing.<h2>When is RAT deployed?</h2>RAT can be deployed automatically if both engines of an aircraft suffer a failure. It can also be deployed in case of a complete loss of power or if severe hydraulic failures are detected. The RAT can also be deployed manually by the pilots in case of an emergency.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pilots-body-flags-gaps-in-air-india-crash-report-calls-for-fresh-probe-to-verify-timeline-rat-deployment-1781497145925">Pilots’ body flags gaps in Air India crash report, calls for fresh probe to verify timeline, RAT deployment</a>As RAT is linked to major failures of an aircraft, its deployment on flight AI171 may give investigators crucial clues on the sequence of events that led to the deadly crash.<h2>What are the doubts raised by pilots’ bodies?</h2>The pilots’ body raised concerns about whether Boeing 787 simulator results align with the timeline outlined in the AAIB’s preliminary findings, which stated that the aircraft’s emergency RAT was deployed after the fuel control switch movement. The FIB suggested that the RAT deployment may have occurred due to an electrical fault or other existing issue, adding that it may have deployed before the fuel switch movement.The FIP also cited flight simulator data indicating that the RAT typically begins generating power roughly 18 seconds after a fuel interruption. On this basis, it argued that the RAT deployment might not be directly linked to fuel switch movement.“While the report indicates RAT power generation approximately 4-5 seconds after fuel interruption, simulator testing reportedly indicates approximately 18 seconds. The letter therefore suggests that RAT deployment may have occurred before fuel control switch movement and may indicate an earlier system or electrical fault requiring further investigation,” the letter read.Referring to CCTV footage from Ahmedabad airport, the letter noted that the RAT appeared to already be deployed while the aircraft was still on the runway before rotation. This, it said, further strengthens the possibility of an earlier system anomaly rather than a fuel-control-triggered event.The letter additionally highlighted a series of events leading up to the crash, including a loud explosion-like sound, a noticeable dimming of cabin lights, and multiple ACARS maintenance messages sent before takeoff. It suggested that these elements, along with damage patterns seen in the aft flight recorder imagery, should be analysed together to reconstruct a clear and consistent timeline and to assess whether an electrical failure played a role.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/air-india-crash-investigation-ongoing-several-aspects-being-examined-says-aaib-1781271827693">Air India plane crash investigation ongoing, several aspects being examined, says AAIB</a>The association urged the investigating agency to independently verify the acceleration data in the preliminary report and to closely examine the relationship between RAT deployment, hydraulic power generation, and fuel control switch movement. The FIP recommended that these aspects be fully addressed in the final investigation report.<h2>Ahmedabad plane crash</h2>On June 12, Air India flight Boeing Dreamliner 787-8, carrying 242 people onboard, crashed moments after taking off from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad in the afternoon. The deadly incident resulted in the death of 241 people on board, leaving only one survivor. Other casualties were also reported on the ground at the site of the crash, bringing the total death toll from the incident to 260.WATCH | IAF Jet Crash: IAF Orders A Court Of Inquiry To Ascertain Cause Of Crash <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaf-jet-crash-iaf-orders-a-court-of-inquiry-to-ascertain-cause-of-crash-1781367113826/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaf-jet-crash-iaf-orders-a-court-of-inquiry-to-ascertain-cause-of-crash-1781367113826/embed</a>&nbsp;

The pilots’ body has questioned the AI171 crash report’s RAT timeline, suggesting a possible earlier technical fault. The emergency system’s deployment is now central to the investigation.

The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has written to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), flagging discrepancies in the preliminary report on the Air India Flight AI171 crash. Highlighting that the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) may not be linked to the fuel interruption and raising doubts on the timeline, the FIP has called for fresh simulator tests to verify the sequence of events. The issue has drawn attention to a little-known aircraft safety system, which may provide investigators with clues on what led to the deadly crash that claimed the lives of 260 people onboard and on the ground, leaving just one surviving passenger. What is a Ram Air Turbine (RAT)? A Ram Air Turbine (RAT) is an emergency backup power system installed on several commercial aircraft, including the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which was involved in the crash in Ahmedabad last year. The RAT, which is a small wind-driven turbine, is connected to a hydraulic pump or an electric generator. It is deployed automatically if a plane experiences a major loss of electrical power, hydraulic power, or engine-generated power. Once deployed, the RAT can provide enough power to operate critical flight controls, instruments, communication systems and other essential functions needed for pilots to maintain control of the aircraft and attempt a landing. When is RAT deployed? RAT can be deployed automatically if both engines of an aircraft suffer a failure. It can also be deployed in case of a complete loss of power or if severe hydraulic failures are detected. The RAT can also be deployed manually by the pilots in case of an emergency. Also read | Pilots’ body flags gaps in Air India crash report, calls for fresh probe to verify timeline, RAT deployment As RAT is linked to major failures of an aircraft, its deployment on flight AI171 may give investigators crucial clues on the sequence of events that led to the deadly crash. What are the doubts raised by pilots’ bodies? The pilots’ body raised concerns about whether Boeing 787 simulator results align with the timeline outlined in the AAIB’s preliminary findings, which stated that the aircraft’s emergency RAT was deployed after the fuel control switch movement. The FIB suggested that the RAT deployment may have occurred due to an electrical fault or other existing issue, adding that it may have deployed before the fuel switch movement. The FIP also cited flight simulator data indicating that the RAT typically begins generating power roughly 18 seconds after a fuel interruption. On this basis, it argued that the RAT deployment might not be directly linked to fuel switch movement. “While the report indicates RAT power generation approximately 4-5 seconds after fuel interruption, simulator testing reportedly indicates approximately 18 seconds. The letter therefore suggests that RAT deployment may have occurred before fuel control switch movement and may indicate an earlier system or electrical fault requiring further investigation,” the letter read. Referring to CCTV footage from Ahmedabad airport, the letter noted that the RAT appeared to already be deployed while the aircraft was still on the runway before rotation. This, it said, further strengthens the possibility of an earlier system anomaly rather than a fuel-control-triggered event. The letter additionally highlighted a series of events leading up to the crash, including a loud explosion-like sound, a noticeable dimming of cabin lights, and multiple ACARS maintenance messages sent before takeoff. It suggested that these elements, along with damage patterns seen in the aft flight recorder imagery, should be analysed together to reconstruct a clear and consistent timeline and to assess whether an electrical failure played a role. Also read | Air India plane crash investigation ongoing, several aspects being examined, says AAIB The association urged the investigating agency to independently verify the acceleration data in the preliminary report and to closely examine the relationship between RAT deployment, hydraulic power generation, and fuel control switch movement. The FIP recommended that these aspects be fully addressed in the final investigation report. Ahmedabad plane crash On June 12, Air India flight Boeing Dreamliner 787-8, carrying 242 people onboard, crashed moments after taking off from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad in the afternoon. The deadly incident resulted in the death of 241 people on board, leaving only one survivor. Other casualties were also reported on the ground at the site of the crash, bringing the total death toll from the incident to 260. WATCH | IAF Jet Crash: IAF Orders A Court Of Inquiry To Ascertain Cause Of Crash https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaf-jet-crash-iaf-orders-a-court-of-inquiry-to-ascertain-cause-of-crash-1781367113826/embed

The pilots’ body has questioned the AI171 crash report’s RAT timeline, suggesting a possible earlier technical fault. The emergency system’s deployment is now central to the investigation.

What is RAT and how does it work? The emergency system at the centre of Air India crash probe | WION Decodes

The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has written to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), flagging discrepancies in the preliminary report on the Air India Flight AI171 crash. Highlighting that the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) may not be linked to the fuel interruption and raising doubts on the timeline, the FIP has called for fresh simulator tests to verify the sequence of events. This comes as the AAIB on Friday (Jun 12) released an interim report on one of the deadliest aviation disasters in the country, marking its one-year anniversary. The crash claimed the lives of 260 people on board and on the ground, leaving just one surviving passenger.<h2>What did the FIP say?</h2>The pilots’ body raised concerns about whether Boeing 787 simulator results align with the timeline outlined in the AAIB’s preliminary findings, which stated that the aircraft’s emergency RAT was deployed after the fuel control switch movement. The FIB suggested that the RAT deployment may have occurred due to an electrical fault or other existing issue, adding that it may have deployed before the fuel switch movement.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/what-is-rat-and-how-does-it-work-the-emergency-system-at-the-centre-air-india-crash-probe-wion-decodes-1781515875010">What is RAT and how does it work? The emergency system at the centre Air India crash probe | WION Decodes</a>The FIP also cited flight simulator data indicating that the RAT typically begins generating power roughly 18 seconds after a fuel interruption. On this basis, it argued that the RAT deployment might not be directly linked to fuel switch movement.“While the report indicates RAT power generation approximately 4-5 seconds after fuel interruption, simulator testing reportedly indicates approximately 18 seconds. The letter therefore suggests that RAT deployment may have occurred before fuel control switch movement and may indicate an earlier system or electrical fault requiring further investigation,” the letter read.Referring to CCTV footage from Ahmedabad airport, the letter noted that the RAT appeared to already be deployed while the aircraft was still on the runway before rotation. This, it said, further strengthens the possibility of an earlier system anomaly rather than a fuel-control-triggered event.The letter additionally highlighted a series of events leading up to the crash, including a loud explosion-like sound, a noticeable dimming of cabin lights, and multiple ACARS maintenance messages sent before takeoff. It suggested that these elements, along with damage patterns seen in the aft flight recorder imagery, should be analysed together to reconstruct a clear and consistent timeline and to assess whether an electrical failure played a role.The association urged the investigating agency to independently verify the acceleration data in the preliminary report and to closely examine the relationship between RAT deployment, hydraulic power generation, and fuel control switch movement. The FIP recommended that these aspects be fully addressed in the final investigation report.WATCH | IAF Jet Crash: IAF Orders A Court Of Inquiry To Ascertain Cause Of Crash <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaf-jet-crash-iaf-orders-a-court-of-inquiry-to-ascertain-cause-of-crash-1781367113826/embed/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaf-jet-crash-iaf-orders-a-court-of-inquiry-to-ascertain-cause-of-crash-1781367113826/embed/embed</a>&nbsp;

FIP has flagged inconsistencies in the Air India AI171 crash report, questioning RAT activation timing and fuel-switch link, citing simulator data, CCTV footage, and urging a deeper AAIB investigation.

The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has written to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), flagging discrepancies in the preliminary report on the Air India Flight AI171 crash. Highlighting that the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) may not be linked to the fuel interruption and raising doubts on the timeline, the FIP has called for fresh simulator tests to verify the sequence of events. This comes as the AAIB on Friday (Jun 12) released an interim report on one of the deadliest aviation disasters in the country, marking its one-year anniversary. The crash claimed the lives of 260 people on board and on the ground, leaving just one surviving passenger. What did the FIP say? The pilots’ body raised concerns about whether Boeing 787 simulator results align with the timeline outlined in the AAIB’s preliminary findings, which stated that the aircraft’s emergency RAT was deployed after the fuel control switch movement. The FIB suggested that the RAT deployment may have occurred due to an electrical fault or other existing issue, adding that it may have deployed before the fuel switch movement. Also read | What is RAT and how does it work? The emergency system at the centre Air India crash probe | WION Decodes The FIP also cited flight simulator data indicating that the RAT typically begins generating power roughly 18 seconds after a fuel interruption. On this basis, it argued that the RAT deployment might not be directly linked to fuel switch movement. “While the report indicates RAT power generation approximately 4-5 seconds after fuel interruption, simulator testing reportedly indicates approximately 18 seconds. The letter therefore suggests that RAT deployment may have occurred before fuel control switch movement and may indicate an earlier system or electrical fault requiring further investigation,” the letter read. Referring to CCTV footage from Ahmedabad airport, the letter noted that the RAT appeared to already be deployed while the aircraft was still on the runway before rotation. This, it said, further strengthens the possibility of an earlier system anomaly rather than a fuel-control-triggered event. The letter additionally highlighted a series of events leading up to the crash, including a loud explosion-like sound, a noticeable dimming of cabin lights, and multiple ACARS maintenance messages sent before takeoff. It suggested that these elements, along with damage patterns seen in the aft flight recorder imagery, should be analysed together to reconstruct a clear and consistent timeline and to assess whether an electrical failure played a role. The association urged the investigating agency to independently verify the acceleration data in the preliminary report and to closely examine the relationship between RAT deployment, hydraulic power generation, and fuel control switch movement. The FIP recommended that these aspects be fully addressed in the final investigation report. WATCH | IAF Jet Crash: IAF Orders A Court Of Inquiry To Ascertain Cause Of Crash https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaf-jet-crash-iaf-orders-a-court-of-inquiry-to-ascertain-cause-of-crash-1781367113826/embed/embed

FIP has flagged inconsistencies in the Air India AI171 crash report, questioning RAT activation timing and fuel-switch link, citing simulator data, CCTV footage, and urging a deeper AAIB investigation.

Pilots’ body flags gaps in Air India crash report, calls for fresh probe to verify timeline, RAT deployment

The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday (February 12) rejected media reports suggesting that the probe into the Air India Flight AI-171 crash had been completed, calling such claims “incorrect and speculative.” In a statement, the aviation investigation authority, which functions under the Ministry of Civil Aviation, stressed that inquiries into the June 2025 tragedy remain ongoing. It stressed that no definitive findings have been issued so far.&nbsp;The clarification follows a report by Italian daily Corriere della Sera, which claimed that investigators had ruled out any technical malfunction involving the aircraft’s fuel switches. The publication, citing sources from Western aviation agencies, suggested that the crash may have resulted from an “intentional act,” alleging that one of the pilots switched off both fuel controls before the aircraft went down. Refuting these assertions, the AAIB reiterated that the investigation has not reached any final stage and warned against drawing premature conclusions.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/dac-approves-114-rafale-jets-from-france-for-iaf-90-to-be-manufactured-in-india-1770899769494">DAC approves 114 Rafale jets from France for IAF; 90 to be manufactured in India</a>&nbsp;Air India Flight 171, operated by a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, crashed near Ahmedabad airport on June 12, 2025, moments after takeoff. The aircraft lost power in both engines and descended within 32 seconds, striking a medical students’ hostel. Of the 242 people on board, 241 lost their lives. Several individuals on the ground were also killed, taking the total death toll to 260.&nbsp;In the aftermath of the disaster, Air India has started returning personal belongings recovered from the wreckage to the families of victims. The airline confirmed that thousands of items, including clothing, jewellery, travel papers, electronic gadgets, and other valuables, were retrieved during search operations at the crash site.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/bangladesh-votes-first-time-since-hasina-s-ouster-as-bnp-faces-jamaat-challenge-1770900267156/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/bangladesh-votes-first-time-since-hasina-s-ouster-as-bnp-faces-jamaat-challenge-1770900267156/embed</a>&nbsp;According to the airline, each recovered item was catalogued and preserved before efforts were made to identify and match them with the rightful families. The handover process is being conducted in coordination with local authorities and consular representatives, especially in cases involving relatives living abroad. Families are being approached individually and provided with details about how and when the belongings will be returned. While the initiative aims to offer some measure of closure, it has also drawn scrutiny and raised concerns among affected families.

'Incorrect and speculative': AAIB denies report claiming investigation in Air India AI-171 crash is complete

The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday (February 12) rejected media reports suggesting that the probe into the Air India Flight AI-171 crash had been completed, calling such claims “incorrect and speculative.” In a statement, the aviation investigation authority, which functions under the Ministry of Civil Aviation, stressed that inquiries into the June 2025 tragedy remain ongoing. It stressed that no definitive findings have been issued so far. The clarification follows a report by Italian daily Corriere della Sera, which claimed that investigators had ruled out any technical malfunction involving the aircraft’s fuel switches. The publication, citing sources from Western aviation agencies, suggested that the crash may have resulted from an “intentional act,” alleging that one of the pilots switched off both fuel controls before the aircraft went down. Refuting these assertions, the AAIB reiterated that the investigation has not reached any final stage and warned against drawing premature conclusions. Also Read: DAC approves 114 Rafale jets from France for IAF; 90 to be manufactured in India Air India Flight 171, operated by a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, crashed near Ahmedabad airport on June 12, 2025, moments after takeoff. The aircraft lost power in both engines and descended within 32 seconds, striking a medical students’ hostel. Of the 242 people on board, 241 lost their lives. Several individuals on the ground were also killed, taking the total death toll to 260. In the aftermath of the disaster, Air India has started returning personal belongings recovered from the wreckage to the families of victims. The airline confirmed that thousands of items, including clothing, jewellery, travel papers, electronic gadgets, and other valuables, were retrieved during search operations at the crash site. https://www.wionews.com/videos/bangladesh-votes-first-time-since-hasina-s-ouster-as-bnp-faces-jamaat-challenge-1770900267156/embed According to the airline, each recovered item was catalogued and preserved before efforts were made to identify and match them with the rightful families. The handover process is being conducted in coordination with local authorities and consular representatives, especially in cases involving relatives living abroad. Families are being approached individually and provided with details about how and when the belongings will be returned. While the initiative aims to offer some measure of closure, it has also drawn scrutiny and raised concerns among affected families.

AAIB rejects claims that the Air India AI-171 crash investigation is complete, saying the probe remains ongoing with no final findings yet

&nbsp;Air India has started the process of returning personal belongings recovered from the wreckage of its Ahmedabad plane crash to the families of victims, months after one of India’s deadliest aviation disasters in recent history. 

The move comes as investigations and legal proceedings related to the crash continue in India and abroad.

The crash occurred in June 2025, when an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner operating a scheduled flight from Ahmedabad to London crashed shortly after take-off.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The aircraft was carrying 242 people, including passengers and crew. All but one person on board were killed, along with several people on the ground, making it one of the most catastrophic air accidents involving an Indian carrier in decades.

According to the airline, thousands of personal items were recovered from the crash site during extensive search and recovery operations. These include clothing, jewellery, travel documents, electronic devices and other personal effects belonging to passengers and crew members.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Air India said each item was carefully catalogued, documented and preserved before being matched, where possible, with the rightful families.

The airline has said that the return of belongings is being carried out through a structured and sensitive process, in coordination with local authorities and consular officials, particularly for families based overseas. Families are being contacted individually and provided guidance on how the belongings will be handed over.

However, the process has not been without controversy.&nbsp;&nbsp;Some families, especially those living in the United Kingdom, have voiced distress over the manner in which certain communications were handled. In a few cases, relatives reported receiving images or descriptions of recovered items that they found deeply upsetting, prompting criticism of the airline’s approach and calls for greater sensitivity.

Beyond the return of personal effects, Air India continues to face scrutiny over broader issues linked to the crash. Investigations into the cause of the accident are ongoing, with aviation authorities examining technical data, maintenance records and cockpit voice recordings.&nbsp;&nbsp;Separately, several families have initiated legal action, particularly in the UK, seeking compensation and accountability.

In response, Air India has said it remains committed to supporting victims’ families and acknowledged the profound grief they continue to experience. The airline has reiterated its intention to cooperate fully with investigators and legal authorities while improving communication with affected relatives

Ahmedabad plane crash: Air India starts returning victims’ belongings to families of victims

Air India has started the process of returning personal belongings recovered from the wreckage of its Ahmedabad plane crash to the families of victims, months after one of India’s deadliest aviation disasters in recent history. The move comes as investigations and legal proceedings related to the crash continue in India and abroad. The crash occurred in June 2025, when an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner operating a scheduled flight from Ahmedabad to London crashed shortly after take-off. The aircraft was carrying 242 people, including passengers and crew. All but one person on board were killed, along with several people on the ground, making it one of the most catastrophic air accidents involving an Indian carrier in decades. According to the airline, thousands of personal items were recovered from the crash site during extensive search and recovery operations. These include clothing, jewellery, travel documents, electronic devices and other personal effects belonging to passengers and crew members. Air India said each item was carefully catalogued, documented and preserved before being matched, where possible, with the rightful families. The airline has said that the return of belongings is being carried out through a structured and sensitive process, in coordination with local authorities and consular officials, particularly for families based overseas. Families are being contacted individually and provided guidance on how the belongings will be handed over. However, the process has not been without controversy. Some families, especially those living in the United Kingdom, have voiced distress over the manner in which certain communications were handled. In a few cases, relatives reported receiving images or descriptions of recovered items that they found deeply upsetting, prompting criticism of the airline’s approach and calls for greater sensitivity. Beyond the return of personal effects, Air India continues to face scrutiny over broader issues linked to the crash. Investigations into the cause of the accident are ongoing, with aviation authorities examining technical data, maintenance records and cockpit voice recordings. Separately, several families have initiated legal action, particularly in the UK, seeking compensation and accountability. In response, Air India has said it remains committed to supporting victims’ families and acknowledged the profound grief they continue to experience. The airline has reiterated its intention to cooperate fully with investigators and legal authorities while improving communication with affected relatives

Air India said each item was carefully catalogued, documented and preserved before being matched, where possible, with the rightful families

In 2025, multiple aviation disasters involving jets, helicopters, military aircraft and leisure flights killed hundreds worldwide. From deadly mid-air collisions to crashes after takeoff, the tragedies sparked investigations and renewed global safety concerns.

From Potomac River mid-air collision to Air India crash: Biggest aviation disasters of 2025

From deadly stampedes and terror attacks to plane crashes, floods and industrial disasters, 2025 saw hundreds of deaths across India. Here are the major tragedies that shook India to the core this year.

Pahalgam attack, Air India crash, Delhi blast: Tragedies that shook India in 2025

India will reportedly send investigators to the US next week to review data gathered on the deadly Air India Flight 171 crash in Ahmedabad with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). One of the worst aviation disasters in India, 260 people on board and on the ground were killed in the tragic accident. Only one person survived the devastating crash. India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has been leading the probe into the ill-fated Boeing 787 Dreamliner.Bloomberg reported, citing a person familiar with the matter, that Indian investigators plan to share their findings, including any information gleaned from the plane’s cockpit voice and flight data recorders.The report added that the meeting will be held at the NTSB’s headquarters in Washington. The representatives from other parties related to the investigation, including Boeing, will also be present. The NTSB or AAIB has not made any official statement regarding the meeting.On June 12, 2025, Air India flight AI171, travelling from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed shortly after taking off. The preliminary report suggested that the aircraft’s fuel-control switches were turned off immediately after the plane took off from Ahmedabad’s Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, which resulted in the plane losing power. Despite the move being reversed about 10 seconds later, the plane crashed into the hostel block of B. J. Medical College.Last month, the Indian Supreme Court issued an order stating that no one can blame the pilot for the crash after a plea made by his father for a judicial inquiry into the incident.“It’s extremely unfortunate, this crash, but you should not carry this burden that your son is being blamed. Nobody can blame him for anything,” Justice Surya Kant said.Justice Joymalya Bagchi added, “One pilot asked whether the fuel was cut off by the other; the other said no. There's no suggestion of fault in that report.”&nbsp;&nbsp;

The meeting will be held at the NTSB’s headquarters in Washington. The representatives from other parties related to the investigation, including Boeing, will also be present.

India will reportedly send investigators to the US next week to review data gathered on the deadly Air India Flight 171 crash in Ahmedabad with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). One of the worst aviation disasters in India, 260 people on board and on the ground were killed in the tragic accident. Only one person survived the devastating crash. India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has been leading the probe into the ill-fated Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Bloomberg reported, citing a person familiar with the matter, that Indian investigators plan to share their findings, including any information gleaned from the plane’s cockpit voice and flight data recorders. The report added that the meeting will be held at the NTSB’s headquarters in Washington. The representatives from other parties related to the investigation, including Boeing, will also be present. The NTSB or AAIB has not made any official statement regarding the meeting. On June 12, 2025, Air India flight AI171, travelling from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed shortly after taking off. The preliminary report suggested that the aircraft’s fuel-control switches were turned off immediately after the plane took off from Ahmedabad’s Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, which resulted in the plane losing power. Despite the move being reversed about 10 seconds later, the plane crashed into the hostel block of B. J. Medical College. Last month, the Indian Supreme Court issued an order stating that no one can blame the pilot for the crash after a plea made by his father for a judicial inquiry into the incident. “It’s extremely unfortunate, this crash, but you should not carry this burden that your son is being blamed. Nobody can blame him for anything,” Justice Surya Kant said. Justice Joymalya Bagchi added, “One pilot asked whether the fuel was cut off by the other; the other said no. There's no suggestion of fault in that report.”

The meeting will be held at the NTSB’s headquarters in Washington. The representatives from other parties related to the investigation, including Boeing, will also be present.

Air India crash probe: Indian, US officials to meet in Washington? Report claims as investigation continues

A shocking revelation has come to the fore as the mortal remains of victims of the Air India 171 are being investigated. Coroner Professor Fiona Wilcox, in her report, mentioned "dangerously high" levels of toxins had been used to preserve the bodies of the deceased, which, when opened, were exposed to all workers in the mortuary. She states, “Hazard presented to all mortuary users from the method in which bodies of deceased persons being repatriated to&nbsp;the UK were preserved and returned.”&nbsp;As evidence, the report notes, “Following the incident a number of deceased persons were repatriated to Westminster Public Mortuary. The remains of these&nbsp;deceased persons were wrapped and saturated in high concentrations of formalin (apparently 40%) as a preservative and returned in lined coffins. On opening the coffins, it was apparent that&nbsp;there was a significant chemical hazard from the formalin to all users of the mortuary.”&nbsp;The expert advice summarised the danger of formalin to be that formalin contains&nbsp;formaldehyde.&nbsp;“This substance can cause severe respiratory irritation. It is a volatile substance which means that it disperses into the atmosphere.&nbsp;It is carcinogenic and is known to cause acute myeloid leukaemia.&nbsp;It has toxic effects including metabolic acidosis, bronchospasm, pulmonary&nbsp; oedema and death.” &nbsp;

<h2>June 12 crash in Ahmedabad</h2>&nbsp;India witnessed a horrific aviation disaster on June 12 as Air India flight AI-171 crashed minutes after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The plane burst into flames after piercing through a medical college mess, where young doctors were having their meals. The Police have now confirmed that 265 bodies have been recovered from the crash site, which includes 5 MBBS students.&nbsp;The crash that took place in Ahmedabad only saw one miracle survivor, Vishwaskumar Ramesh, who came out of the aircraft moments before it burst into flames. Speaking to state media Doordarshan, he said, “The side where I was sitting wasn't on the hostel side, it was the ground floor of the hostel. I don't know about others, but the place I was sitting that portion landed on the ground floor, and there was some space. As soon as my door broke, I saw that there was some space, and then I tried to get out, and I got out. There was a building wall on the opposite side, and the plane had crashed completely on that side, so probably that is why nobody could get out from that side. There was space only where I was. I don't know how I survived.”&nbsp;A high-level government committee was formed to investigate the crash, and a thorough report on the incident will be recorded and to be submitted in 3 months. As of this date, the preliminary reports suggest that the fuel to the engine was cut off. From the recording retrieved from the cockpit, it appears that a conversation took place between the two pilots, and both responded negatively. This clarified that neither of them had turned off the fuel.

Coroner Professor Fiona Wilcox, in her report, mentioned "dangerously high" levels of toxins had been used to preserve the bodies of the deceased, which, when opened, were exposed to all workers in the mortuary.

A shocking revelation has come to the fore as the mortal remains of victims of the Air India 171 are being investigated. Coroner Professor Fiona Wilcox, in her report, mentioned "dangerously high" levels of toxins had been used to preserve the bodies of the deceased, which, when opened, were exposed to all workers in the mortuary. She states, “Hazard presented to all mortuary users from the method in which bodies of deceased persons being repatriated to the UK were preserved and returned.” As evidence, the report notes, “Following the incident a number of deceased persons were repatriated to Westminster Public Mortuary. The remains of these deceased persons were wrapped and saturated in high concentrations of formalin (apparently 40%) as a preservative and returned in lined coffins. On opening the coffins, it was apparent that there was a significant chemical hazard from the formalin to all users of the mortuary.” The expert advice summarised the danger of formalin to be that formalin contains formaldehyde. “This substance can cause severe respiratory irritation. It is a volatile substance which means that it disperses into the atmosphere. It is carcinogenic and is known to cause acute myeloid leukaemia. It has toxic effects including metabolic acidosis, bronchospasm, pulmonary oedema and death.”

Coroner Professor Fiona Wilcox, in her report, mentioned "dangerously high" levels of toxins had been used to preserve the bodies of the deceased, which, when opened, were exposed to all workers in the mortuary.

'Dangerously high' levels of toxins found in bodies of Air India crash victims repatriated to UK, hazardous to mortuary workers

The Supreme Court on Friday (Nov 7) observed that no one can blame the pilot for the crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad earlier in June this year, killing 260 people onboard and on the ground. The court issued a notice to the Centre and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in response to the plea made by the pilot’s father for a judicial inquiry into the plane crash.&nbsp;The A Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was hearing the petition filed by Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, the father of Commander Sumeet Sabharwal, one of the pilots who was flying the tragic Air India plane.&nbsp;“It’s extremely unfortunate, this crash, but you should not carry this burden that your son is being blamed. Nobody can blame him for anything,” Justice Kant told the Senior Advocate.&nbsp;“I am the father of the Commander of the plane... I am 91 years old. This is a non-independent investigation. It should have been independent. It has taken four months,” Sabharwal stated in his plea. He also urged the court to monitor the investigation into the crash under Rule 12 of the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, which mandates impartiality in accident probes. During the hearing, his concerns about his late son being unfairly blamed for the plane crash were also addressed.&nbsp;“One pilot asked whether the fuel was cut off by the other; the other said no. There's no suggestion of fault in that report,” the Justice Bagchi noted.&nbsp;&nbsp;His lawyer, Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, highlighted safety concerns regarding Boeing aircraft globally, adding that the Ahmedabad crash must be seen in a broader context. However, Justice Bagchi observed that if he challenges the investigation itself, he would have to “challenge the statutory provisions of the Act itself.”&nbsp;The top court also snubbed foreign reports, saying that no one in India believes that the crash was the pilot’s fault.&nbsp;&nbsp;“We are not bothered by foreign reports. Your remedy should then be before a foreign court,” Justice Bagchi said. Justice Kant added, “That is nasty reporting. No one in India believes it was the pilot's fault.”

The Supreme Court on Friday (Nov 7) observed that no one can blame the pilot for the crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad earlier in June this year, killing 260 people onboard and on the ground.

The Supreme Court on Friday (Nov 7) observed that no one can blame the pilot for the crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad earlier in June this year, killing 260 people onboard and on the ground. The court issued a notice to the Centre and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in response to the plea made by the pilot’s father for a judicial inquiry into the plane crash. The A Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was hearing the petition filed by Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, the father of Commander Sumeet Sabharwal, one of the pilots who was flying the tragic Air India plane. “It’s extremely unfortunate, this crash, but you should not carry this burden that your son is being blamed. Nobody can blame him for anything,” Justice Kant told the Senior Advocate. “I am the father of the Commander of the plane... I am 91 years old. This is a non-independent investigation. It should have been independent. It has taken four months,” Sabharwal stated in his plea. He also urged the court to monitor the investigation into the crash under Rule 12 of the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, which mandates impartiality in accident probes. During the hearing, his concerns about his late son being unfairly blamed for the plane crash were also addressed. “One pilot asked whether the fuel was cut off by the other; the other said no. There's no suggestion of fault in that report,” the Justice Bagchi noted. His lawyer, Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, highlighted safety concerns regarding Boeing aircraft globally, adding that the Ahmedabad crash must be seen in a broader context. However, Justice Bagchi observed that if he challenges the investigation itself, he would have to “challenge the statutory provisions of the Act itself.” The top court also snubbed foreign reports, saying that no one in India believes that the crash was the pilot’s fault. “We are not bothered by foreign reports. Your remedy should then be before a foreign court,” Justice Bagchi said. Justice Kant added, “That is nasty reporting. No one in India believes it was the pilot's fault.”

The Supreme Court on Friday (Nov 7) observed that no one can blame the pilot for the crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad earlier in June this year, killing 260 people onboard and on the ground.

‘Nobody can blame pilot’: Supreme Court issues notice on Air India crash probe, snubs foreign reports as ‘nasty’

The fatal Air India AI-171 crash in Ahmedabad saw one miracle survivor, Vishwaskumar Ramesh. Minutes after takeoff, the aircraft rammed into a medical college hostel and broke into flames. Months after the accident, Ramesh (40) spoke to news outlet Sky News and spoke of how his life is still, and how he continues to experience pain both mentally and physically. In the same London-bound aircraft, his younger brother also lost his life; Ramesh has still not been able to make peace with his brother’s death.&nbsp;Speaking to the journalist, the 40-year-old said that he lies in bed thinking about his brother. He mentioned that his family is a huge support, and his wife has been helping him with his quotidian chores. But the loss of his younger, who he called his “backbone”, weighs heavily on him.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Viswashkumar Ramesh was the sole surviving passenger when an Air India flight crashed in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, in June. &quot;It is very painful,&quot; Mr Ramesh tells <a href="https://twitter.com/SophyRidgeSky?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SophyRidgeSky</a> on the new <a href="https://twitter.com/RidgeandFrost?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RidgeandFrost</a> <a href="https://t.co/tQ3pdJQaYG">pic.twitter.com/tQ3pdJQaYG</a>&mdash; Sky News (@SkyNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1985225429666668637?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>June 12 crash in Ahmedabad</h2>&nbsp;The crash that took place in Ahmedabad only saw one miracle survivor, Vishwaskumar Ramesh, who came out of the aircraft moments before it burst into flames. Speaking to state media Doordarshan, he said, "The side where I was sitting wasn't on the hostel side, it was the ground floor of the hostel. I don't know about others, but the place I was sitting that portion landed on the ground floor, and there was some space. As soon as my door broke, I saw that there was some space, and then I tried to get out, and I got out. There was a building wall on the opposite side, and the plane had crashed completely on that side, so probably that is why nobody could get out from that side. There was space only where I was. I don't know how I survived."&nbsp;India witnessed a horrific aviation disaster on June 12 as Air India flight AI-171 crashed minutes after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The plane burst into flames after piercing through a medical college mess, where young doctors were having their meals. The Police have now confirmed that 265 bodies have been recovered from the crash site, which includes 5 MBBS students.&nbsp;A high-level government committee was formed to investigate the crash, and a thorough report on the incident will be recorded and to be submitted in 3 months. As of this date, the preliminary reports suggest that the fuel to the engine was cut off. From the recording retrieved from the cockpit, it appears that a conversation took place between the two pilots, and both responded negatively. This clarified that neither of them had turned off the fuel.

Speaking to the journalist, the 40-year-old said that he lies in bed thinking about his brother. He mentioned that his family is a huge support, and his wife has been helping him with his quotidian chores. But the loss of his younger, who he called his “backbone”, weighs heavily on him.

The fatal Air India AI-171 crash in Ahmedabad saw one miracle survivor, Vishwaskumar Ramesh. Minutes after takeoff, the aircraft rammed into a medical college hostel and broke into flames. Months after the accident, Ramesh (40) spoke to news outlet Sky News and spoke of how his life is still, and how he continues to experience pain both mentally and physically. In the same London-bound aircraft, his younger brother also lost his life; Ramesh has still not been able to make peace with his brother’s death. Speaking to the journalist, the 40-year-old said that he lies in bed thinking about his brother. He mentioned that his family is a huge support, and his wife has been helping him with his quotidian chores. But the loss of his younger, who he called his “backbone”, weighs heavily on him.

Speaking to the journalist, the 40-year-old said that he lies in bed thinking about his brother. He mentioned that his family is a huge support, and his wife has been helping him with his quotidian chores. But the loss of his younger, who he called his “backbone”, weighs heavily on him.

'I still lie in bed thinking': Air India crash's sole survivor describes trauma of his brother's death

On Monday (September 22), the Supreme Court directed the Union government and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to submit their responses on how they plan to guarantee an ‘unbiased, impartial, and swift’ investigation into the tragic Air India crash that occurred on June 12 in Gujarat. The court was responding to a petition filed by the Safety Matters Foundation, which has called for a court-monitored investigation conducted by an independent entity.&nbsp;Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotishwar Singh, who were presiding over the case, issued notices to both the government and the DGCA, seeking their replies within two weeks. The petition challenged the premature release of a preliminary report by the DGCA that seemed to suggest pilot error as a key cause, particularly pointing to the movement of the fuel control switches from ‘RUN’ to ‘CUTOFF’ shortly after takeoff, leading to engine failure.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/somalia-bound-cargo-ship-loaded-with-rice-and-sugar-catches-fire-off-gujarat-porbandar-coast-1758524786632">Somalia-bound cargo ship loaded with rice and sugar catches fire off Gujarat coast</a>&nbsp;During the hearing, advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioner, argued that over three months had passed since the crash with no clear answers on what caused the incident, why it occurred, and what measures were being implemented to prevent a recurrence. He also flagged the potential conflict of interest in the investigation panel, which includes three members from the DGCA—an organisation already facing scrutiny for possible negligence.&nbsp;While acknowledging the need for an unbiased probe, the bench raised concerns about releasing sensitive information before the investigation finished. The justices questioned the petitioner's call for the flight data recorder to be made public at this stage, emphasising that the final outcome of the inquiry should be shared once it is complete, to avoid premature leaks that could distort the findings.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/2-held-vehicle-seized-in-connection-with-attack-on-assam-rifles-convoy-in-manipur-that-killed-two-soldiers-1758428487104">2 held, vehicle seized in connection with attack on Assam Rifles Convoy in Manipur that killed two soldiers</a>&nbsp;The court also warned against selectively disclosing information that could harm the dignity of those involved. Referring to the pilots, who tragically lost their lives in the crash, the bench stressed that the public release of incomplete or skewed details could affect their families and reputations. It warned that any attempt to release such details prematurely could lead to misrepresentation.&nbsp;The court made it clear that its focus was on ensuring a thorough, impartial, and prompt investigation, but it refrained from making any decisions regarding the public disclosure of the probe's findings at this stage. The investigation into the crash, is being led by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of India, with international cooperation from the US National Transportation Safety Board, the UK's Air Accidents Investigation Branch, and representatives from Boeing.

The Supreme Court has asked the Union government and DGCA to ensure a fair, impartial, and swift investigation into the June 12 Air India crash in Gujarat

On Monday (September 22), the Supreme Court directed the Union government and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to submit their responses on how they plan to guarantee an ‘unbiased, impartial, and swift’ investigation into the tragic Air India crash that occurred on June 12 in Gujarat. The court was responding to a petition filed by the Safety Matters Foundation, which has called for a court-monitored investigation conducted by an independent entity. Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotishwar Singh, who were presiding over the case, issued notices to both the government and the DGCA, seeking their replies within two weeks. The petition challenged the premature release of a preliminary report by the DGCA that seemed to suggest pilot error as a key cause, particularly pointing to the movement of the fuel control switches from ‘RUN’ to ‘CUTOFF’ shortly after takeoff, leading to engine failure. Also Read: Somalia-bound cargo ship loaded with rice and sugar catches fire off Gujarat coast During the hearing, advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioner, argued that over three months had passed since the crash with no clear answers on what caused the incident, why it occurred, and what measures were being implemented to prevent a recurrence. He also flagged the potential conflict of interest in the investigation panel, which includes three members from the DGCA—an organisation already facing scrutiny for possible negligence. While acknowledging the need for an unbiased probe, the bench raised concerns about releasing sensitive information before the investigation finished. The justices questioned the petitioner's call for the flight data recorder to be made public at this stage, emphasising that the final outcome of the inquiry should be shared once it is complete, to avoid premature leaks that could distort the findings. Also Read: 2 held, vehicle seized in connection with attack on Assam Rifles Convoy in Manipur that killed two soldiers The court also warned against selectively disclosing information that could harm the dignity of those involved. Referring to the pilots, who tragically lost their lives in the crash, the bench stressed that the public release of incomplete or skewed details could affect their families and reputations. It warned that any attempt to release such details prematurely could lead to misrepresentation. The court made it clear that its focus was on ensuring a thorough, impartial, and prompt investigation, but it refrained from making any decisions regarding the public disclosure of the probe's findings at this stage. The investigation into the crash, is being led by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of India, with international cooperation from the US National Transportation Safety Board, the UK's Air Accidents Investigation Branch, and representatives from Boeing.

The Supreme Court has asked the Union government and DGCA to ensure a fair, impartial, and swift investigation into the June 12 Air India crash in Gujarat

Air India Crash: SC demands 'impartial and expeditious' investigation, seeks government response

India’s aviation regulator has found 51 safety violations at Air India over the past year during its annual inspection of all commercial airlines. Although not linked to last month’s fatal Boeing 787 crash that killed 260 people, the audit findings have renewed scrutiny of the national carrier.<h2>What did the audit find?</h2>The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) flagged 263 safety issues across eight Indian airlines. Of these, Air India had the second-highest number of lapses (51), including seven Level 1 findings, the most serious classification, and 44 Level 2 lapses. Under UN aviation standards, Level 1 issues show non-compliance that could “seriously endanger safety”, while Level 2 refers to safety gaps that “could lower or possibly hazard safety”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-trucks-launchpad-for-russian-kamikaze-drones-how-american-pickup-trucks-are-helping-russia-bomb-ukraine-despite-sanctions-1753831024342">US trucks launchpad for Russian Kamikaze drones? How American pickup trucks are helping Russia bomb Ukraine, despite sanctions</a>Such findings can lead to immediate actions, including suspension or revocation of an airline’s operating approvals. Airlines are generally given three months to address the issues. The DGCA said it conducts such audits as part of its Annual Surveillance Plan to identify safety concerns and encourage improvements.<h2>Air India responds to safety violations</h2>An Air India spokesperson said the airline was “fully transparent” during the audit process and added that these checks are routine for all airlines. “We acknowledge receipt of the findings and will submit our response to the regulator within the stipulated time frame, along with the details of the corrective actions taken,” the airline said.The DGCA also clarified that it is normal for large airlines to have more observations due to the size and complexity of their operations. “It should be emphasised that, for airlines with extensive operations and large fleet sizes, a higher number of audit findings is entirely normal,” the regulator noted.<h2>Specific lapses at Air India remain unclear</h2>While the audit report itself has not been released, a government document cited by Reuters pointed to serious issues within Air India’s operations. These included gaps in pilot training, use of unapproved simulators, and poor pilot rostering. The report highlighted “recurrent training gaps” among Boeing 787 and 777 pilots who reportedly missed mandatory monitoring duties.<h2>Previous safety issues and growing scrutiny</h2>Earlier this year, Reuters also reported that Air India’s low-cost arm, Air India Express, was reprimanded by the DGCA for delaying the replacement of a critical engine part on an Airbus A320 and falsifying records to show compliance.Air India Express admitted the fault and told regulators it had taken “remedial action and preventive measures”. DGCA chief Faiz Ahmed Kidwai told the BBC that this information came from the airline itself through “self-reporting”. “I would not condone it [the lapses]. But [at least] we have started getting these reports. India’s skies have always been safe,” Kidwai said.<h2>India’s safety record: Better than global average?</h2>Despite the findings, Mr Kidwai defended India’s aviation safety record, citing UN data that shows India has mostly performed better than the global average for accidents per million flights. “Only twice between 2010 and 2024 did we exceed the global average, both years with major accidents,” he said.India has faced three major crashes in 15 years:• June 2025: An Air India Boeing 787 crash killed 260 people.• August 2020: An Air India Express flight skidded off a wet runway in Kozhikode, killing 21.• May 2010: A Dubai–Mangalore flight overshot the runway, killing 158.Meanwhile, between 2020 and early 2025, Indian carriers reported 2,461 technical snags, including 1,288 by IndiGo, 633 by SpiceJet, and 389 combined by Air India and Air India Express. Kidwai said the rise in reported faults was a good sign. “I wouldn’t say I’m pleased about it. But I do see value in the growing culture of reporting. It’s far better for every snag to be brought to the attention of the authorities than keeping quiet and operating the aircraft.”

India’s aviation regulator found 51 safety violations at Air India, including seven serious Level 1 lapses, raising concerns after a fatal crash, though the issues weren’t directly linked.

India’s aviation regulator has found 51 safety violations at Air India over the past year during its annual inspection of all commercial airlines. Although not linked to last month’s fatal Boeing 787 crash that killed 260 people, the audit findings have renewed scrutiny of the national carrier. What did the audit find? The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) flagged 263 safety issues across eight Indian airlines. Of these, Air India had the second-highest number of lapses (51), including seven Level 1 findings, the most serious classification, and 44 Level 2 lapses. Under UN aviation standards, Level 1 issues show non-compliance that could “seriously endanger safety”, while Level 2 refers to safety gaps that “could lower or possibly hazard safety”. Also read: US trucks launchpad for Russian Kamikaze drones? How American pickup trucks are helping Russia bomb Ukraine, despite sanctions Such findings can lead to immediate actions, including suspension or revocation of an airline’s operating approvals. Airlines are generally given three months to address the issues. The DGCA said it conducts such audits as part of its Annual Surveillance Plan to identify safety concerns and encourage improvements. Air India responds to safety violations An Air India spokesperson said the airline was “fully transparent” during the audit process and added that these checks are routine for all airlines. “We acknowledge receipt of the findings and will submit our response to the regulator within the stipulated time frame, along with the details of the corrective actions taken,” the airline said. The DGCA also clarified that it is normal for large airlines to have more observations due to the size and complexity of their operations. “It should be emphasised that, for airlines with extensive operations and large fleet sizes, a higher number of audit findings is entirely normal,” the regulator noted. Specific lapses at Air India remain unclear While the audit report itself has not been released, a government document cited by Reuters pointed to serious issues within Air India’s operations. These included gaps in pilot training, use of unapproved simulators, and poor pilot rostering. The report highlighted “recurrent training gaps” among Boeing 787 and 777 pilots who reportedly missed mandatory monitoring duties. Previous safety issues and growing scrutiny Earlier this year, Reuters also reported that Air India’s low-cost arm, Air India Express, was reprimanded by the DGCA for delaying the replacement of a critical engine part on an Airbus A320 and falsifying records to show compliance. Air India Express admitted the fault and told regulators it had taken “remedial action and preventive measures”. DGCA chief Faiz Ahmed Kidwai told the BBC that this information came from the airline itself through “self-reporting”. “I would not condone it [the lapses]. But [at least] we have started getting these reports. India’s skies have always been safe,” Kidwai said. India’s safety record: Better than global average? Despite the findings, Mr Kidwai defended India’s aviation safety record, citing UN data that shows India has mostly performed better than the global average for accidents per million flights. “Only twice between 2010 and 2024 did we exceed the global average, both years with major accidents,” he said. India has faced three major crashes in 15 years: • June 2025: An Air India Boeing 787 crash killed 260 people. • August 2020: An Air India Express flight skidded off a wet runway in Kozhikode, killing 21. • May 2010: A Dubai–Mangalore flight overshot the runway, killing 158. Meanwhile, between 2020 and early 2025, Indian carriers reported 2,461 technical snags, including 1,288 by IndiGo, 633 by SpiceJet, and 389 combined by Air India and Air India Express. Kidwai said the rise in reported faults was a good sign. “I wouldn’t say I’m pleased about it. But I do see value in the growing culture of reporting. It’s far better for every snag to be brought to the attention of the authorities than keeping quiet and operating the aircraft.”

India’s aviation regulator found 51 safety violations at Air India, including seven serious Level 1 lapses, raising concerns after a fatal crash, though the issues weren’t directly linked.

‘Appalling lapses’: 263 safety faults across Indian airlines; Air India among worst-hit, says DGCA audit

The head of the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on Thursday (July 24) said that the Air India Flight 171 crash on June 12 in which 260 people lost their lives, including 19 on ground, was not due to a mechanical issue or inadvertent movement of the fuel control unit or switches. The statement comes after it came to light that the fuel switches of both engines were moved to the "cutoff" position just before the takeoff.&nbsp;"We can say with a high level of confidence is it doesn't appear to be a mechanical issue with the Boeing fuel control unit," Bryan Bedford, the FAA's administrator, told reporters on the sidelines of an air show in Wisconsin.&nbsp;"We feel very comfortable that this isn't an issue with inadvertent manipulation of fuel control," he added, as reported by news agency Reuters.&nbsp;The investigation into the Air India plane crash is being jointly carried out by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) and NTSB.&nbsp;confusion in cockpit over fuel switches&nbsp;A few days earlier, the &nbsp;Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau released its preliminary investigation report that pointed towards confusion in the cockpit shortly before the June 12 crash. Most importantly the report said that the two fuel control switches aboard the Boeing 787 Dreamliner were moved to the "cutoff" position just before the takeoff, cutting fuel to the engines.&nbsp;The switches were, however, restored about 10 seconds later, but till then the aircraft had lost thrust, leading to the crash.&nbsp;The two pilots involved were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively.&nbsp;According to AAIB's preliminary report, First Officer Clive Kunder is heard asking Captain Sumeet Sabharwal why did he cutoff in the cockpit voice recording. Sabharwal responded by saying he did not do so.&nbsp;After the incident, aviation regulator Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) had asked all airlines operating Boeing 787 and 737 aircraft to examine the fuel switch locking systems. Air India completed the precautionary inspection of the locking mechanism of fuel control switches (FCS) on all the Boeing 787 aircraft in its fleet and found no problems. &nbsp;

The statement by US National Transportation Safety Board comes after it came to light that the fuel switches of both engines of the Air India Flight Boeing 171were moved to the cutoff position just before the takeoff.

The head of the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on Thursday (July 24) said that the Air India Flight 171 crash on June 12 in which 260 people lost their lives, including 19 on ground, was not due to a mechanical issue or inadvertent movement of the fuel control unit or switches. The statement comes after it came to light that the fuel switches of both engines were moved to the "cutoff" position just before the takeoff. "We can say with a high level of confidence is it doesn't appear to be a mechanical issue with the Boeing fuel control unit," Bryan Bedford, the FAA's administrator, told reporters on the sidelines of an air show in Wisconsin. "We feel very comfortable that this isn't an issue with inadvertent manipulation of fuel control," he added, as reported by news agency Reuters. The investigation into the Air India plane crash is being jointly carried out by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) and NTSB. confusion in cockpit over fuel switches A few days earlier, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau released its preliminary investigation report that pointed towards confusion in the cockpit shortly before the June 12 crash. Most importantly the report said that the two fuel control switches aboard the Boeing 787 Dreamliner were moved to the "cutoff" position just before the takeoff, cutting fuel to the engines. The switches were, however, restored about 10 seconds later, but till then the aircraft had lost thrust, leading to the crash. The two pilots involved were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively. According to AAIB's preliminary report, First Officer Clive Kunder is heard asking Captain Sumeet Sabharwal why did he cutoff in the cockpit voice recording. Sabharwal responded by saying he did not do so. After the incident, aviation regulator Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) had asked all airlines operating Boeing 787 and 737 aircraft to examine the fuel switch locking systems. Air India completed the precautionary inspection of the locking mechanism of fuel control switches (FCS) on all the Boeing 787 aircraft in its fleet and found no problems.

The statement by US National Transportation Safety Board comes after it came to light that the fuel switches of both engines of the Air India Flight 171were moved to the "cutoff" position just before the takeoff.

Air India plane crash: US aviation body denies fuel control unit mechanical issue in Boeing plane

Tata Sons on Friday formalised and completed the registration of a public charitable Trust worth Rs 500 crore in Mumbai, dedicated to the victims of the tragic accident of Air India flight AI-171 in Ahmedabad on June 12 that killed 260 people.&nbsp;The Trust will be called 'The AI-171 Memorial and Welfare Trust', the company said in a statement, which would provide both immediate and continuing support to the dependents/next-of-kin of the deceased, to those who were injured, and to all others who are directly or collaterally affected by the accident.&nbsp;“The Trust will also provide aid and assistance for alleviation of any trauma or distress suffered by the first responders, medical and disaster relief professionals, social workers and governmental staff who provided invaluable institutional support and service in the aftermath of the accident,” said the company.&nbsp;Tata Sons and Tata Trusts have together pledged to contribute Rs 500 crore (with both committing Rs 250 crore each) for the Trust's philanthropic objects, which will include ex-gratia payment of Rs. 1 crore for those deceased, medical treatment of those who suffered serious injuries, and support for rebuilding the B.J. Medical College Hostel infrastructure which was damaged in the accident.&nbsp;The Trust will be managed and administered by a 5-member Board of Trustees. The initial two trustees appointed to the Board are S. Padmanabhan, a former Tata veteran and Sidharth Sharma, Tata Sons' General Counsel.&nbsp;“Additional trustees will be appointed shortly. The Trust will be funded and will commence its work in all earnestness after necessary registration with the Tax authorities and other operational formalities, currently underway, are completed,” Tata Sons said.&nbsp;Meanwhile, the Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP), in a letter to the Civil Aviation Ministry, stated that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary report on the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad has failed to sufficiently consider two plausible and previously documented technical scenarios, either of which could have triggered an automated shutdown of both engines of the ill-fated Boeing 787 Dreamliner.&nbsp;The association has urged the Civil Aviation Ministry to include more subject matter experts in the investigation.&nbsp;Pilots' grouping ALPA-India also said that the crew of the crashed AI-171 flight made every possible effort to protect the passengers onboard and they deserve respect, not unfounded character judgements.&nbsp;"The crew of AI-171 made every possible effort – till their very last breath – to protect the passengers on board and minimise harm on the ground. They deserve respect, not unfounded character judgments," ALPA India said in a statement.&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The Trust will be managed and administered by a 5-member Board of Trustees. The initial two trustees appointed to the Board are S. Padmanabhan, a former Tata veteran and Sidharth Sharma, Tata Sons' General Counsel.

Tata Sons on Friday formalised and completed the registration of a public charitable Trust worth Rs 500 crore in Mumbai, dedicated to the victims of the tragic accident of Air India flight AI-171 in Ahmedabad on June 12 that killed 260 people. The Trust will be called 'The AI-171 Memorial and Welfare Trust', the company said in a statement, which would provide both immediate and continuing support to the dependents/next-of-kin of the deceased, to those who were injured, and to all others who are directly or collaterally affected by the accident. “The Trust will also provide aid and assistance for alleviation of any trauma or distress suffered by the first responders, medical and disaster relief professionals, social workers and governmental staff who provided invaluable institutional support and service in the aftermath of the accident,” said the company. Tata Sons and Tata Trusts have together pledged to contribute Rs 500 crore (with both committing Rs 250 crore each) for the Trust's philanthropic objects, which will include ex-gratia payment of Rs. 1 crore for those deceased, medical treatment of those who suffered serious injuries, and support for rebuilding the B.J. Medical College Hostel infrastructure which was damaged in the accident. The Trust will be managed and administered by a 5-member Board of Trustees. The initial two trustees appointed to the Board are S. Padmanabhan, a former Tata veteran and Sidharth Sharma, Tata Sons' General Counsel. “Additional trustees will be appointed shortly. The Trust will be funded and will commence its work in all earnestness after necessary registration with the Tax authorities and other operational formalities, currently underway, are completed,” Tata Sons said. Meanwhile, the Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP), in a letter to the Civil Aviation Ministry, stated that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary report on the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad has failed to sufficiently consider two plausible and previously documented technical scenarios, either of which could have triggered an automated shutdown of both engines of the ill-fated Boeing 787 Dreamliner. The association has urged the Civil Aviation Ministry to include more subject matter experts in the investigation. Pilots' grouping ALPA-India also said that the crew of the crashed AI-171 flight made every possible effort to protect the passengers onboard and they deserve respect, not unfounded character judgements. "The crew of AI-171 made every possible effort – till their very last breath – to protect the passengers on board and minimise harm on the ground. They deserve respect, not unfounded character judgments," ALPA India said in a statement. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The Trust will be managed and administered by a 5-member Board of Trustees. The initial two trustees appointed to the Board are S. Padmanabhan, a former Tata veteran and Sidharth Sharma, Tata Sons' General Counsel.

Air India Ahmedabad crash: Tata Sons creates Rs 500 crore trust for victims

As speculation around the recent Air India crash intensifies in international media, India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday urged all to refrain from drawing conclusions based on “selective and unverified reporting.” The statement comes a day after The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) released a report citing cockpit voice recordings and preliminary conclusions by US authorities, implying that the captain might have accidentally cut fuel to the engines seconds after takeoff.&nbsp;"Necessary to show respect to family members of the dead passengers, crew, and others who lost their lives on the ground as a result of the plane crash," the AAIB said in its statement. The bureau, which operates under India's Ministry of Civil Aviation, also made it clear that any such updates regarding the investigation will be issued only if required.&nbsp;“AAIB will release updates on the Air India plane crash of technical or public interest value as and when needed,” it further read. Rejecting speculation regarding the reason for the crash, the agency said that it was premature to make conclusions and asked for restraint in public statements.It's early to make any firm judgments about the Air India plane crash; the investigation is still pending." "The final investigation report will be released with root causes and recommendations. Avoid spreading early-day narratives."<h2>What the WSJ report said?</h2>The WSJ reports that a cockpit voice recording indicated that the two pilots had a conversation in which First Officer Clive Kunder asked Captain Sumeet Sabharwal as to why he had shut off the fuel flow to the aircraft's engines after liftoff. Sabharwal, according to reports, said that he hadn't. The newspaper quoted individuals who are known to US officials' initial evaluation of the crash, which happened on June 12 in Ahmedabad and resulted in 241 fatalities, including 19 on the ground.

Refrain from premature narratives AAIB refutes US media report on Air India crash urges to respect sensitivity

As speculation around the recent Air India crash intensifies in international media, India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday urged all to refrain from drawing conclusions based on “selective and unverified reporting.” The statement comes a day after The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) released a report citing cockpit voice recordings and preliminary conclusions by US authorities, implying that the captain might have accidentally cut fuel to the engines seconds after takeoff. "Necessary to show respect to family members of the dead passengers, crew, and others who lost their lives on the ground as a result of the plane crash," the AAIB said in its statement. The bureau, which operates under India's Ministry of Civil Aviation, also made it clear that any such updates regarding the investigation will be issued only if required. “AAIB will release updates on the Air India plane crash of technical or public interest value as and when needed,” it further read. Rejecting speculation regarding the reason for the crash, the agency said that it was premature to make conclusions and asked for restraint in public statements. It's early to make any firm judgments about the Air India plane crash; the investigation is still pending." "The final investigation report will be released with root causes and recommendations. Avoid spreading early-day narratives." What the WSJ report said? The WSJ reports that a cockpit voice recording indicated that the two pilots had a conversation in which First Officer Clive Kunder asked Captain Sumeet Sabharwal as to why he had shut off the fuel flow to the aircraft's engines after liftoff. Sabharwal, according to reports, said that he hadn't. The newspaper quoted individuals who are known to US officials' initial evaluation of the crash, which happened on June 12 in Ahmedabad and resulted in 241 fatalities, including 19 on the ground.

The statement comes a day after The Wall Street Journal published a report citing cockpit voice recordings and early assessments by US officials, suggesting the captain may have inadvertently cut fuel supply to the engines seconds after takeoff

'Refrain from premature narratives': AAIB refutes US media report on Air India crash, urges to 'respect sensitivity'

A preliminary investigation report into last month's Air India crash revealed that within seconds of the takeoff, the fuel control switches on the engines were moved from the "RUN" position to the “CUTOFF” position. The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, however, didn't conclude who was at fault for the crash, which killed 260 people, including 241 passengers and crew. One of the two pilots questioned the other why he had turned off the switches. The other replied that he didn't turn off the switch before sounding the Mayday alerts. After the accident, both switches were found in the "run" position, indicating the pilots' last-ditch effort to salvage the situation. Experts, however, have raised some pertinent questions as to the findings of the report.&nbsp;The 15-page report said that once the aircraft achieved its top recorded speed, "the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec". It didn't reveal why there was a gap of one second.&nbsp;"In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," it added. The switches then returned to the "RUN" position, and the engines appeared to be gathering power, but "one of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY'", the report added.&nbsp;Earlier this week, a report, citing sources, said the authorities had narrowed their focus to the movement of the engine fuel switches.&nbsp;The US Federal Aviation Administration had issued an information bulletin in 2018 about "the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature", the Air India crash report pointed out, adding that it was not considered an "unsafe condition".&nbsp;It wasn't clear from the cockpit recording mentioned in the report which pilot said what. The preliminary report also does not say how the switch could have flipped to the cutoff position.<h2>What experts said on the Air India crash report</h2>US aviation safety expert John Cox, however, told Reuters that a pilot can't accidentally move the fuel switches. He said one can't bump the switches and move them. US aviation safety expert Anthony Brickhouse also doubted that the pilots may have accidentally pushed the switches. "If they were moved because of a pilot, why?" he asked.&nbsp;The switches flipped a second apart, the report said, roughly the time it would take to shift one and then the other, US aviation expert John Nance told Reuters.&nbsp;Air India has acknowledged the receipt of the 15-page preliminary report and said it continues to fully cooperate with the authorities.&nbsp;"We continue to mourn the loss and are fully committed to providing support during this difficult time. Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses," Air India stated in a post on X.&nbsp;The crash killed 260 people, including 229 passengers, 12 crew members, and 19 people on the ground.

A preliminary investigation report into last month's Air India crash revealed that within seconds of the takeoff, the fuel control switches on the engines were moved from the "run" to the "cutoff".

A preliminary investigation report into last month's Air India crash revealed that within seconds of the takeoff, the fuel control switches on the engines were moved from the "RUN" position to the “CUTOFF” position. The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, however, didn't conclude who was at fault for the crash, which killed 260 people, including 241 passengers and crew. One of the two pilots questioned the other why he had turned off the switches. The other replied that he didn't turn off the switch before sounding the Mayday alerts. After the accident, both switches were found in the "run" position, indicating the pilots' last-ditch effort to salvage the situation. Experts, however, have raised some pertinent questions as to the findings of the report. The 15-page report said that once the aircraft achieved its top recorded speed, "the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec". It didn't reveal why there was a gap of one second. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," it added. The switches then returned to the "RUN" position, and the engines appeared to be gathering power, but "one of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY'", the report added. Earlier this week, a report, citing sources, said the authorities had narrowed their focus to the movement of the engine fuel switches. The US Federal Aviation Administration had issued an information bulletin in 2018 about "the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature", the Air India crash report pointed out, adding that it was not considered an "unsafe condition". It wasn't clear from the cockpit recording mentioned in the report which pilot said what. The preliminary report also does not say how the switch could have flipped to the cutoff position. What experts said on the Air India crash report US aviation safety expert John Cox, however, told Reuters that a pilot can't accidentally move the fuel switches. He said one can't bump the switches and move them. US aviation safety expert Anthony Brickhouse also doubted that the pilots may have accidentally pushed the switches. "If they were moved because of a pilot, why?" he asked. The switches flipped a second apart, the report said, roughly the time it would take to shift one and then the other, US aviation expert John Nance told Reuters. Air India has acknowledged the receipt of the 15-page preliminary report and said it continues to fully cooperate with the authorities. "We continue to mourn the loss and are fully committed to providing support during this difficult time. Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses," Air India stated in a post on X. The crash killed 260 people, including 229 passengers, 12 crew members, and 19 people on the ground.

Air India has acknowledged the receipt of the 15-page preliminary report and said it continues to fully cooperate with the authorities.

Air India crash: Can pilots accidentally shut engines? 'RUN-CUTOFF' switches, 1 second-gap confound experts

The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) of India's Union Ministry of Civil Aviation released the preliminary report on the probe of the June 12 crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8 aircraft bearing registration VT-ANB in Ahmedabad, revealing that both the engines of the aircraft shut down within seconds of takeoff. The AAIB report, based on preliminary facts and evidence collected during investigation, says that both engines ceased functioning seconds after takeoff as the fuelling mechanisms switched from RUN to CUTOFF sequentially.&nbsp;In the cockpit audio, one voice is heard asking, “Why did you cutoff” and gets an answer of “I didn’t” from the other pilot.Both engines experienced a momentary recovery after an initial loss of thrust but ultimately failed to stabilise.&nbsp;Besides, permanent power loss was indicated by RAT (Ram Air Turbine) deployment, which was also captured on CCTV, the report states.The aircraft had reached a maximum speed of 180 knots indicated airspeed (IAS) at 08:08:42 UTC, just before both Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF, effectively shutting down both engines in-flight.&nbsp;The report adds that both engines were cut off within a second of each other, just after takeoff. The fuel switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after the other, with a gap of just one second, causing the engine N1 and N2 speeds to drop as fuel supply was lost and the aircraft began losing altitude before it could even cross the airport’s perimeter wall.&nbsp;&nbsp;No significant bird activity was noted near the flight path, ruling out bird hit as a possible cause at this stage, the probe report added.It further reveals that there were no reports of bird activity or weather concerns as skies were clear with good visibility and light winds.The aircraft was airborne for a total of 32 seconds before crashing into a hostel.&nbsp;The thrust levers were at ‘idle’ which suggests malfunction or disconnect when black box data indicates takeoff thrust was engaged.The flap setting (5°) and gear (DOWN) were appropriate for the takeoff configuration.&nbsp;No immediate evidence of sabotage was found though an FAA advisory regarding a fuel switch flaw was known, and inspections were not conducted by Air India.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

The fuel switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after the other, with a gap of just one second, causing the engine N1 and N2 speeds to drop as fuel supply was lost and the aircraft began losing altitude before it could even cross the airport’s perimeter wall. 

The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) of India's Union Ministry of Civil Aviation released the preliminary report on the probe of the June 12 crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8 aircraft bearing registration VT-ANB in Ahmedabad, revealing that both the engines of the aircraft shut down within seconds of takeoff. The AAIB report, based on preliminary facts and evidence collected during investigation, says that both engines ceased functioning seconds after takeoff as the fuelling mechanisms switched from RUN to CUTOFF sequentially. In the cockpit audio, one voice is heard asking, “Why did you cutoff” and gets an answer of “I didn’t” from the other pilot. Both engines experienced a momentary recovery after an initial loss of thrust but ultimately failed to stabilise. Besides, permanent power loss was indicated by RAT (Ram Air Turbine) deployment, which was also captured on CCTV, the report states. The aircraft had reached a maximum speed of 180 knots indicated airspeed (IAS) at 08:08:42 UTC, just before both Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF, effectively shutting down both engines in-flight. The report adds that both engines were cut off within a second of each other, just after takeoff. The fuel switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after the other, with a gap of just one second, causing the engine N1 and N2 speeds to drop as fuel supply was lost and the aircraft began losing altitude before it could even cross the airport’s perimeter wall. No significant bird activity was noted near the flight path, ruling out bird hit as a possible cause at this stage, the probe report added. It further reveals that there were no reports of bird activity or weather concerns as skies were clear with good visibility and light winds. The aircraft was airborne for a total of 32 seconds before crashing into a hostel. The thrust levers were at ‘idle’ which suggests malfunction or disconnect when black box data indicates takeoff thrust was engaged. The flap setting (5°) and gear (DOWN) were appropriate for the takeoff configuration. No immediate evidence of sabotage was found though an FAA advisory regarding a fuel switch flaw was known, and inspections were not conducted by Air India.

The fuel switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after the other, with a gap of just one second, causing the engine N1 and N2 speeds to drop as fuel supply was lost and the aircraft began losing altitude before it could even cross the airport’s perimeter wall.&nbsp;

‘Both engines shut down within seconds of takeoff,’ says AAIB report on Air India crash

The Indian government on Thursday (Jul 10) debunked a post circulating on WhatsApp claiming to be the preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on the investigation into the crash of the Air India flight AI-171. In a post on social media, the Press Information Bureau (PIB) posted a fact check, saying the message is fake and urging citizens to only rely on official sources for information. On June 12, a flight carrying 242 people onboard crashed shortly after taking off in Ahmedabad, killing 241 and leaving only one survivor.&nbsp;“A message circulating on #WhatsApp claims to be the preliminary investigation report of the AI-171 crash by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). #PIBFactCheck: This message is #Fake,” PIB posted on X.&nbsp;“This report has not been issued by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. Always rely on official sources for accurate information,” it added.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">A message circulating on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WhatsApp?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WhatsApp</a> claims to be the preliminary investigation report of the AI-171 crash by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PIBFactCheck?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PIBFactCheck</a>: ❌ This message is <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Fake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Fake</a> ✅ This report has not been issued by the Aircraft Accident Investigation… <a href="https://t.co/XkT5tiKQxg">pic.twitter.com/XkT5tiKQxg</a>&mdash; PIB Fact Check (@PIBFactCheck) <a href="https://twitter.com/PIBFactCheck/status/1943219115516473534?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 10, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;<h2>Fake report alleges mechanical error</h2>&nbsp;The fake report claimed that the captain’s seat suddenly slid backwards during takeoff, which caused the thrust levers to be pulled into idle, reducing the engine power. The First Officer was unable to counter the mechanical force to advance the throttles.&nbsp;“According to the AAIB, the captain's seat suddenly slid backward during rotation, a moment when the aircraft was lifting off the runway. This rearward movement was due to the failure of the AFT locking mechanism of the seat track. As the captain's body was thrust rearward, his weight inadvertently pulled the thrust levers into idle, drastically reducing engine power during a critical phase of flight. The First Officer attempted to advance the throttles but was unable to counter the mechanical force and body weight obstructing the levers,” The fake report said.&nbsp;The AAIB has not issued any such report. In addition, no crash involving an Air India flight has occurred as described in the fake report.&nbsp;<h2>AAIB investigation</h2>&nbsp;The investigation into the Ahmedabad plane crash is still underway. The AAIB was given 30 days to submit its preliminary findings to the International Civil Aviation Organisation. However, the public release of the report is not mandatory. On July 8, the AAIB submitted a preliminary report to the Ministry of Civil Aviation. The report filed is based on the initial findings of the probe. The five-page report shares early insights into the sequence of events leading up to the crash, but it does not identify the cause of the accident. The details of the report have not been made public yet.

The investigation into the Ahmedabad plane crash is still underway. The AAIB was given 30 days to submit its preliminary findings to the International Civil Aviation Organisation.

The Indian government on Thursday (Jul 10) debunked a post circulating on WhatsApp claiming to be the preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on the investigation into the crash of the Air India flight AI-171. In a post on social media, the Press Information Bureau (PIB) posted a fact check, saying the message is fake and urging citizens to only rely on official sources for information. On June 12, a flight carrying 242 people onboard crashed shortly after taking off in Ahmedabad, killing 241 and leaving only one survivor. “A message circulating on #WhatsApp claims to be the preliminary investigation report of the AI-171 crash by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). #PIBFactCheck: This message is #Fake,” PIB posted on X. “This report has not been issued by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. Always rely on official sources for accurate information,” it added.

The investigation into the Ahmedabad plane crash is still underway. The AAIB was given 30 days to submit its preliminary findings to the International Civil Aviation Organisation.

‘Preliminary report’ on Ahmedabad plane crash goes viral. PIB fact checks

The crash of the AI-171 flight from Ahmedabad to London on June 12 has befuddled pilots and aviation experts and remains a mystery. Meanwhile, Air India training pilots on the airline’s Boeing 787 fleet in Mumbai tried to recreate the likely scenarios that resulted in the tragedy in which over 260 people were killed. The pilots incorporated various electrical failures that could cause a dual-engine failure and impact the aircraft’s ability to climb after takeoff. The result: They were unsuccessful. The trainer-pilots ensured accuracy in their simulation by replicating the precise trim sheet data of the flight AI-171. A trim sheet is a document used to calculate and record an aircraft’s weight and balance, ensuring the centre of gravity is within safe limits for takeoff, flight, and landing.They also simulated single-engine failure, left the undercarriage down, and retracted the flaps completely.&nbsp;<h2>Single-engine failure unlikely to have caused crash</h2>&nbsp;In spite of using all these scenarios considered unsafe and improper in the simulation, AI-171, with a single operational engine, was able to gain altitude safely.&nbsp;Boeing 787-8’s General Electric GEnx-1B67-K turbo-fans have been uprated to produce a significant 70,000 pounds of thrust each. These are among the most powerful engines developed for civilian aircraft in the class of Boeing 787.&nbsp;Accident investigators, who have already downloaded data from the jetliner’s black boxes (flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders), will also examine the position of the fuel switches on the 787 and corroborate this data with any wreckage of the fuel switches that may have been found. This would be crucial in ascertaining whether any of the engines were accidentally switched off by the pilots during a critical phase of the flight—the takeoff run or shortly after the aircraft lifted off from Ahmedabad.&nbsp;<h2>Dual-engine failure could be catastrophic</h2>&nbsp;However, a dual-engine failure, as widely speculated, would be catastrophic.Pilots on Air India’s Boeing 787 fleet are not trained to deal with a dual-engine failure at an altitude of less than 400 feet, as in the case of AI-171. This would be ‘negative training’, i.e., training for scenarios where the chances of successful recovery are technically not possible.A dual-engine failure at the altitude of AI-171 would have likely resulted in a crash.&nbsp;<h2>AAIB preliminary report likely to help pinpoint reasons</h2>&nbsp;The experts are hoping that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau’s (AAIB) preliminary report, which is likely next week, will help pinpoint the reasons that resulted in a dual-engine failure.&nbsp;The outcome of the investigations will be critical for Air India, which operates 33 Boeing 787 Dreamliners, consisting of 26 Boeing 787-8s and 7 Boeing 787-9s.&nbsp;AI-171 was the first crash of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner since the aircraft entered service in October 2011.&nbsp;The analysis of data from the black boxes is underway at the AAIB’s laboratory in Delhi and will help in ascertaining the sequence of events leading to the crash as also why both engines simultaneously lost power.

The trainer pilots of the Air India team incorporated various electrical failures that could cause a dual-engine failure and impact the aircraft’s ability to climb after takeoff. The result: They were unsuccessful.

The crash of the AI-171 flight from Ahmedabad to London on June 12 has befuddled pilots and aviation experts and remains a mystery. Meanwhile, Air India training pilots on the airline’s Boeing 787 fleet in Mumbai tried to recreate the likely scenarios that resulted in the tragedy in which over 260 people were killed. The pilots incorporated various electrical failures that could cause a dual-engine failure and impact the aircraft’s ability to climb after takeoff. The result: They were unsuccessful. The trainer-pilots ensured accuracy in their simulation by replicating the precise trim sheet data of the flight AI-171. A trim sheet is a document used to calculate and record an aircraft’s weight and balance, ensuring the centre of gravity is within safe limits for takeoff, flight, and landing. They also simulated single-engine failure, left the undercarriage down, and retracted the flaps completely. Single-engine failure unlikely to have caused crash In spite of using all these scenarios considered unsafe and improper in the simulation, AI-171, with a single operational engine, was able to gain altitude safely. Boeing 787-8’s General Electric GEnx-1B67-K turbo-fans have been uprated to produce a significant 70,000 pounds of thrust each. These are among the most powerful engines developed for civilian aircraft in the class of Boeing 787. Accident investigators, who have already downloaded data from the jetliner’s black boxes (flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders), will also examine the position of the fuel switches on the 787 and corroborate this data with any wreckage of the fuel switches that may have been found. This would be crucial in ascertaining whether any of the engines were accidentally switched off by the pilots during a critical phase of the flight—the takeoff run or shortly after the aircraft lifted off from Ahmedabad. Dual-engine failure could be catastrophic However, a dual-engine failure, as widely speculated, would be catastrophic. Pilots on Air India’s Boeing 787 fleet are not trained to deal with a dual-engine failure at an altitude of less than 400 feet, as in the case of AI-171. This would be ‘negative training’, i.e., training for scenarios where the chances of successful recovery are technically not possible. A dual-engine failure at the altitude of AI-171 would have likely resulted in a crash. AAIB preliminary report likely to help pinpoint reasons The experts are hoping that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau’s (AAIB) preliminary report, which is likely next week, will help pinpoint the reasons that resulted in a dual-engine failure. The outcome of the investigations will be critical for Air India, which operates 33 Boeing 787 Dreamliners, consisting of 26 Boeing 787-8s and 7 Boeing 787-9s. AI-171 was the first crash of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner since the aircraft entered service in October 2011. The analysis of data from the black boxes is underway at the AAIB’s laboratory in Delhi and will help in ascertaining the sequence of events leading to the crash as also why both engines simultaneously lost power.

The trainer pilots of the Air India team incorporated various electrical failures that could cause a dual-engine failure and impact the aircraft’s ability to climb after takeoff. The result: They were unsuccessful.

Air India pilots recreate AI-171’s final moments on simulator. Did they find the flaw?

Indian security agencies are conducting a comprehensive investigation into the Air India AI 171 crash in Ahmedabad, examining all possible causes, including potential sabotage, according to a report and other media sources. The probe follows a "prevention through elimination" approach, systematically checking all scenarios that could have caused the accident intentionally.The investigation was triggered by the highly unusual dual engine failure - described by aviation experts as extremely rare. While no concrete evidence of sabotage has emerged, the scale of casualties (260 lives) and international significance have prompted authorities to examine all angles carefully.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/beyond-the-12-day-war-what-s-next-for-iran-s-nuclear-ambitions-and-mideast-peace-1750749618173">Beyond the 12-Day War: What's Next for Iran's Nuclear Ambitions and Mideast Peace?</a><h2>Government Confirms Multi-Agency Probe</h2>Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol confirmed that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is leading the investigation into the June 12, 2025, crash. Speaking to NDTV at the Pune Emerging Business Conclave, he outlined the comprehensive probe."The AAIB has launched a thorough investigation examining every possibility - sabotage is one of them. CCTV footage is being reviewed, and multiple agencies are working together," Mohol stated to NDTV, emphasising the unprecedented nature of simultaneous dual engine failure.<h2>Black Box Analysis Key</h2>The investigation will intensify once experts decode the recovered black box recordings. The flight data recorder contains critical information and cockpit voice recordings from the aircraft's final moments.Mohol explained that the Cockpit Voice Recorder captured the pilots' final conversation. "Everything will be made clear once the investigation report is complete, which should take about three months," he said, clarifying that all analysis will be conducted domestically without sending the black box abroad.<h2>Technical Investigation</h2>The probe will determine whether the cause was technical - engine malfunction or fuel supply problems. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed 30 seconds after takeoff from Ahmedabad Airport, bound for London Gatwick, with 242 people aboard.This marked the first fatal Boeing 787 accident since 2011 commercial service began, and Air India's first fatal crash since 1985.<h2>Broader Aviation Issues</h2>Minister Mohol also addressed sector challenges, noting 419 technical vacancies at the Directorate General of Civil Aviation that need filling, concerns about airlines overworking pilots, and efforts to make air travel more affordable.<h2>Potential Sabotage Angles Under Investigation</h2>As part of their comprehensive probe, security agencies are examining several potential sabotage scenarios to rule out foul play. These investigation angles include:<h2>1. Fuel Supply Security Under Scrutiny</h2>Intelligence officials have revealed to CNN News18 that investigators are conducting detailed examinations of the aircraft's fuel supply chain to determine if contamination played a role in the crash. This comprehensive review covers every stage of the fuel handling process.The investigation focuses on three critical areas of fuel management. First, authorities are examining fuel sourcing - tracking where the aviation fuel originated and whether it met required quality standards before reaching the airport. Second, they're analysing fuel storage systems at Ahmedabad airport, checking storage tanks and facilities for any signs of contamination or unauthorised access that could have compromised fuel quality.Third, investigators are scrutinising the hydrant fuel system - the network of underground pipes and equipment used to deliver fuel directly from storage tanks to aircraft. Any breach in this system could potentially allow contaminants to enter the fuel supply.The probe extends beyond technical systems to human factors. Security agencies are conducting thorough background checks on all ground staff involved in fuel operations, including fuel truck operators, quality control personnel, and maintenance workers. Additionally, investigators are reviewing contracts with fuel suppliers and service providers to identify any potential security vulnerabilities or suspicious activities.This angle of investigation stems from the understanding that contaminated or adulterated fuel could cause catastrophic engine failure. Aviation fuel must meet extremely strict quality standards, and even minor contamination with water, dirt, or chemicals could lead to engine malfunction or complete failure - potentially explaining the rare dual-engine shutdown that occurred during the AI 171 flight.The forensic review involves laboratory analysis of fuel samples, examination of fuel handling equipment, and verification of fuel quality documentation to ensure no tampering occurred in the supply chain.<h2>2. Aircraft Maintenance and Insider Threats</h2>Investigation teams are closely examining the maintenance history of the crashed Boeing 787 Dreamliner, as these advanced aircraft require complex and frequent servicing to operate safely. Officials are particularly concerned about the possibility of deliberate sabotage by someone with inside access to the aircraft.a.Complex Maintenance RequirementsThe Boeing 787 Dreamliner is a sophisticated aircraft with advanced electronic systems, composite materials, and cutting-edge technology. This complexity means the plane needs regular, detailed maintenance checks by highly trained technicians. Investigators are reviewing whether all required maintenance was properly completed before the flight.b. Insider Sabotage ConcernsSecurity agencies are investigating whether someone with authorized access to the aircraft - such as maintenance workers, ground crew, or airport personnel - may have intentionally caused damage. This type of threat is particularly dangerous because insiders have legitimate access to restricted areas and aircraft systems.c.Key Areas Under InvestigationInvestigators are examining several critical aspects of aircraft maintenance:Overlooked Problems:&nbsp;Teams are checking whether any mechanical faults or warning signs were missed or ignored during routine inspections. Sometimes small issues can escalate into major failures if not addressed properly.Unauthorised Changes:&nbsp;Officials are verifying that only approved, certified aircraft parts were used and that no unauthorised modifications or component replacements occurred. Using incorrect or substandard parts could lead to system failures.Maintenance Records:&nbsp;All maintenance logs and service records are being scrutinised to ensure work was completed according to aviation safety standards and that nothing was falsified or omitted.Tool and Equipment Tracking:&nbsp; Investigators are checking systems that track maintenance tools and equipment to ensure nothing was left inside the aircraft that could cause problems, and that all tools were accounted for after maintenance work.Personnel Background Checks:&nbsp;The backgrounds, credentials, and recent activities of all maintenance technicians and support staff who worked on the aircraft are being thoroughly investigated to identify any potential security risks or suspicious behaviour.This comprehensive approach helps determine whether human error, negligence, or intentional sabotage in the maintenance process contributed to the tragic accident.<h2>3. Digital Attack on Aircraft Systems</h2>Senior intelligence officials are investigating whether the crash could have been caused by a cyber attack - essentially hackers targeting the aircraft's computer systems. Modern planes like the Boeing 787 rely heavily on digital technology, making them potentially vulnerable to sophisticated cyber threats.a. How Aircraft Can Be HackedToday's commercial aircraft are essentially flying computers with complex software controlling everything from engines to navigation. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses advanced computer systems to manage flight operations, which creates potential entry points for cybercriminals or hostile actors to interfere with the plane's normal functioning.b.Types of Digital Interference Being InvestigatedMalicious Software (Malware): Investigators are checking whether harmful computer programs were secretly installed on the aircraft's systems. This malware could have been designed to disrupt engine operations or other critical functions at a specific time, such as during takeoff.Software Tampering:&nbsp;Experts are examining whether the aircraft's original software was altered or corrupted in ways that could cause system failures. Even small changes to flight control software could have catastrophic consequences.Systems Under Digital Investigation: Cybersecurity experts are conducting detailed digital forensic examinations of several key aircraft systems:Engine Control Units:&nbsp;These are the computers that manage engine performance, fuel flow, and power output. If compromised, they could cause engines to malfunction or shut down unexpectedly.Flight Management Systems: These computer systems handle navigation, flight planning, and autopilot functions. Any interference could affect the aircraft's ability to maintain stable flight.Ground Maintenance Computers: Investigators are also checking computer terminals used for aircraft maintenance and pre-flight checks, as these systems could be entry points for introducing malicious code into the aircraft's systems.Command Spoofing: This involves sending false instructions to aircraft systems, essentially tricking the plane's computers into thinking they're receiving legitimate commands when they're actually being manipulated by an outside source.This type of investigation represents a new frontier in aviation security, as planes become increasingly computerised and potentially vulnerable to the same types of cyber attacks that target other digital infrastructure.<h2>4. Airport Security Breaches Under Investigation</h2>Security officials are examining whether unauthorised individuals gained access to restricted airport areas or if trusted airport personnel may have been compromised. This investigation focuses on determining if someone without proper clearance reached the aircraft or if legitimate staff members acted inappropriately.a.What Investigators Are CheckingUnauthorised Entry:&nbsp;Authorities are investigating whether people without proper security clearance somehow entered secure zones of the airport where they could access the aircraft. Airports have multiple security layers, and investigators want to ensure no one bypassed these protections.Compromised Staff:&nbsp;Officials are also looking into whether airport employees, airline staff, or security personnel may have been bribed, threatened, or otherwise influenced to help carry out sabotage. This could include anyone from baggage handlers to maintenance crews to security guards.b.Digital Evidence Being ReviewedAccess Control Records: Investigators are examining electronic logs that track who used keycards, badges, or other access devices to enter restricted areas. These digital records show exactly when and where each person entered secure zones.Fingerprint and Biometric Data: Modern airports use fingerprint scanners, facial recognition, and other biometric systems to verify identity. Officials are reviewing all this biological identification data to confirm that only authorized personnel accessed sensitive areas.Security Camera Footage: Teams are carefully studying hours of CCTV recordings from cameras throughout the airport, paying special attention to footage from the hours and days before the flight. This includes cameras monitoring aircraft parking areas, maintenance zones, fuel operations, and other critical locations.Pre-Flight Period Focus:&nbsp;Investigators are particularly interested in activities during the time leading up to departure, when the aircraft was being prepared, fueled, loaded with baggage, and undergo final safety checks. Any suspicious activity during this vulnerable period could be significant.This comprehensive security review helps determine whether the tragic accident resulted from a failure in airport security measures or involved individuals who exploited their trusted positions to cause harm.<h2>5. Investigating Specific Targets on Board</h2>Intelligence officials are examining whether the aircraft was deliberately targeted because of specific passengers or the cargo it was carrying. This line of investigation explores whether someone wanted to harm particular individuals or destroy certain items being transported on the flight.a. Why This Aircraft May Have Been ChosenAccording to CNN News18 sources, investigators are considering whether the AI 171 flight was selected as a target for specific reasons rather than being a random attack on aviation. The aircraft could have been chosen because it carried something or someone that made it a valuable target for those with malicious intent.b. Passenger Background InvestigationsSecurity agencies are conducting thorough background checks on all passengers aboard the flight, looking for individuals who might have been specifically targeted:Political Figures: Investigators are checking if any passengers were politicians, government officials, or individuals involved in sensitive political activities who might have had enemies.Intelligence Connections: Officials are examining whether any passengers had connections to intelligence agencies, either as operatives or sources, making them potential targets for foreign adversaries.Legal Sensitivities:&nbsp;The probe includes reviewing if any passengers were involved in high-profile legal cases, such as witnesses in important trials, whistleblowers, or individuals facing legal proceedings who might have been targeted.<h2>6. Cargo Manifest Review</h2>Beyond passengers, investigators are also examining the aircraft's cargo manifest - the official list of all items being transported in the plane's cargo hold. This review aims to determine if valuable, sensitive, or strategically important cargo was being shipped that could have made the flight a target.a. Strategic and Symbolic SignificanceIntelligence sources suggest the investigation is considering whether destroying this particular flight served a broader strategic purpose or a symbolic goal. For example, the crash could have been intended to send a political message, disrupt specific operations, or eliminate multiple targets simultaneously.This comprehensive approach helps investigators understand whether the tragedy was a random act of terrorism or a carefully planned operation targeting specific individuals or cargo on board the aircraft.<h2>6. Foreign Involvement and Electronic Interference</h2>a.International Threats Under InvestigationSecurity agencies are examining whether foreign countries or international terrorist groups may have been involved in the crash. Officials are treating this as a potential act of retaliation or a demonstration of hostile capabilities against India.b.Foreign Government Involvement:Investigators are checking if enemy nations or countries with strained relations with India orchestrated the attack as part of broader geopolitical conflicts.Non-State Actors: Officials are also looking into whether international terrorist organisations or criminal groups with no official government backing carried out the sabotage to make a statement or seek revenge for previous actions.<h2>7. Air Traffic Control System Attacks</h2>Another major area of investigation involves potential interference with the airport's air traffic control and navigation systems. Modern aircraft rely heavily on electronic signals and communications that can be disrupted by sophisticated attackers.GPS Signal Manipulation: Investigators are checking whether someone used technology to send false GPS signals to the aircraft, potentially causing it to receive incorrect location information that could lead to navigation errors.Communication Jamming:&nbsp;Officials are examining if radio signals between the aircraft and air traffic control were blocked or disrupted, preventing pilots from receiving crucial instructions or emergency guidance.False Control Tower Instructions: The probe includes checking whether attackers impersonated air traffic controllers and sent dangerous or misleading commands to the pilots, potentially causing them to make fatal decisions.This multi-faceted investigation underscores the authorities' unwavering commitment to leaving no stone unturned in determining the true cause of the AI 171 tragedy. By meticulously examining every possibility, from intricate technical failures to sophisticated sabotage, India aims not only to provide closure for the victims' families but also to fortify its aviation security protocols against any future threats, ensuring the highest standards of safety in the skies.

Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol confirmed that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is leading the investigation into the June 12, 2025 crash. 

Indian security agencies are conducting a comprehensive investigation into the Air India AI 171 crash in Ahmedabad, examining all possible causes, including potential sabotage, according to a report and other media sources. The probe follows a "prevention through elimination" approach, systematically checking all scenarios that could have caused the accident intentionally. The investigation was triggered by the highly unusual dual engine failure - described by aviation experts as extremely rare. While no concrete evidence of sabotage has emerged, the scale of casualties (260 lives) and international significance have prompted authorities to examine all angles carefully. Also read: Beyond the 12-Day War: What's Next for Iran's Nuclear Ambitions and Mideast Peace? Government Confirms Multi-Agency Probe Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol confirmed that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is leading the investigation into the June 12, 2025, crash. Speaking to NDTV at the Pune Emerging Business Conclave, he outlined the comprehensive probe. "The AAIB has launched a thorough investigation examining every possibility - sabotage is one of them. CCTV footage is being reviewed, and multiple agencies are working together," Mohol stated to NDTV, emphasising the unprecedented nature of simultaneous dual engine failure. Black Box Analysis Key The investigation will intensify once experts decode the recovered black box recordings. The flight data recorder contains critical information and cockpit voice recordings from the aircraft's final moments. Mohol explained that the Cockpit Voice Recorder captured the pilots' final conversation. "Everything will be made clear once the investigation report is complete, which should take about three months," he said, clarifying that all analysis will be conducted domestically without sending the black box abroad. Technical Investigation The probe will determine whether the cause was technical - engine malfunction or fuel supply problems. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed 30 seconds after takeoff from Ahmedabad Airport, bound for London Gatwick, with 242 people aboard. This marked the first fatal Boeing 787 accident since 2011 commercial service began, and Air India's first fatal crash since 1985. Broader Aviation Issues Minister Mohol also addressed sector challenges, noting 419 technical vacancies at the Directorate General of Civil Aviation that need filling, concerns about airlines overworking pilots, and efforts to make air travel more affordable. Potential Sabotage Angles Under Investigation As part of their comprehensive probe, security agencies are examining several potential sabotage scenarios to rule out foul play. These investigation angles include: 1. Fuel Supply Security Under Scrutiny Intelligence officials have revealed to CNN News18 that investigators are conducting detailed examinations of the aircraft's fuel supply chain to determine if contamination played a role in the crash. This comprehensive review covers every stage of the fuel handling process. The investigation focuses on three critical areas of fuel management. First, authorities are examining fuel sourcing - tracking where the aviation fuel originated and whether it met required quality standards before reaching the airport. Second, they're analysing fuel storage systems at Ahmedabad airport, checking storage tanks and facilities for any signs of contamination or unauthorised access that could have compromised fuel quality. Third, investigators are scrutinising the hydrant fuel system - the network of underground pipes and equipment used to deliver fuel directly from storage tanks to aircraft. Any breach in this system could potentially allow contaminants to enter the fuel supply. The probe extends beyond technical systems to human factors. Security agencies are conducting thorough background checks on all ground staff involved in fuel operations, including fuel truck operators, quality control personnel, and maintenance workers. Additionally, investigators are reviewing contracts with fuel suppliers and service providers to identify any potential security vulnerabilities or suspicious activities. This angle of investigation stems from the understanding that contaminated or adulterated fuel could cause catastrophic engine failure. Aviation fuel must meet extremely strict quality standards, and even minor contamination with water, dirt, or chemicals could lead to engine malfunction or complete failure - potentially explaining the rare dual-engine shutdown that occurred during the AI 171 flight. The forensic review involves laboratory analysis of fuel samples, examination of fuel handling equipment, and verification of fuel quality documentation to ensure no tampering occurred in the supply chain. 2. Aircraft Maintenance and Insider Threats Investigation teams are closely examining the maintenance history of the crashed Boeing 787 Dreamliner, as these advanced aircraft require complex and frequent servicing to operate safely. Officials are particularly concerned about the possibility of deliberate sabotage by someone with inside access to the aircraft. a.Complex Maintenance Requirements The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is a sophisticated aircraft with advanced electronic systems, composite materials, and cutting-edge technology. This complexity means the plane needs regular, detailed maintenance checks by highly trained technicians. Investigators are reviewing whether all required maintenance was properly completed before the flight. b. Insider Sabotage Concerns Security agencies are investigating whether someone with authorized access to the aircraft - such as maintenance workers, ground crew, or airport personnel - may have intentionally caused damage. This type of threat is particularly dangerous because insiders have legitimate access to restricted areas and aircraft systems. c.Key Areas Under Investigation Investigators are examining several critical aspects of aircraft maintenance: Overlooked Problems: Teams are checking whether any mechanical faults or warning signs were missed or ignored during routine inspections. Sometimes small issues can escalate into major failures if not addressed properly. Unauthorised Changes: Officials are verifying that only approved, certified aircraft parts were used and that no unauthorised modifications or component replacements occurred. Using incorrect or substandard parts could lead to system failures. Maintenance Records: All maintenance logs and service records are being scrutinised to ensure work was completed according to aviation safety standards and that nothing was falsified or omitted. Tool and Equipment Tracking: Investigators are checking systems that track maintenance tools and equipment to ensure nothing was left inside the aircraft that could cause problems, and that all tools were accounted for after maintenance work. Personnel Background Checks: The backgrounds, credentials, and recent activities of all maintenance technicians and support staff who worked on the aircraft are being thoroughly investigated to identify any potential security risks or suspicious behaviour. This comprehensive approach helps determine whether human error, negligence, or intentional sabotage in the maintenance process contributed to the tragic accident. 3. Digital Attack on Aircraft Systems Senior intelligence officials are investigating whether the crash could have been caused by a cyber attack - essentially hackers targeting the aircraft's computer systems. Modern planes like the Boeing 787 rely heavily on digital technology, making them potentially vulnerable to sophisticated cyber threats. a. How Aircraft Can Be Hacked Today's commercial aircraft are essentially flying computers with complex software controlling everything from engines to navigation. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses advanced computer systems to manage flight operations, which creates potential entry points for cybercriminals or hostile actors to interfere with the plane's normal functioning. b.Types of Digital Interference Being Investigated Malicious Software (Malware): Investigators are checking whether harmful computer programs were secretly installed on the aircraft's systems. This malware could have been designed to disrupt engine operations or other critical functions at a specific time, such as during takeoff. Software Tampering: Experts are examining whether the aircraft's original software was altered or corrupted in ways that could cause system failures. Even small changes to flight control software could have catastrophic consequences. Systems Under Digital Investigation: Cybersecurity experts are conducting detailed digital forensic examinations of several key aircraft systems: Engine Control Units: These are the computers that manage engine performance, fuel flow, and power output. If compromised, they could cause engines to malfunction or shut down unexpectedly. Flight Management Systems: These computer systems handle navigation, flight planning, and autopilot functions. Any interference could affect the aircraft's ability to maintain stable flight. Ground Maintenance Computers: Investigators are also checking computer terminals used for aircraft maintenance and pre-flight checks, as these systems could be entry points for introducing malicious code into the aircraft's systems. Command Spoofing: This involves sending false instructions to aircraft systems, essentially tricking the plane's computers into thinking they're receiving legitimate commands when they're actually being manipulated by an outside source. This type of investigation represents a new frontier in aviation security, as planes become increasingly computerised and potentially vulnerable to the same types of cyber attacks that target other digital infrastructure. 4. Airport Security Breaches Under Investigation Security officials are examining whether unauthorised individuals gained access to restricted airport areas or if trusted airport personnel may have been compromised. This investigation focuses on determining if someone without proper clearance reached the aircraft or if legitimate staff members acted inappropriately. a.What Investigators Are Checking Unauthorised Entry: Authorities are investigating whether people without proper security clearance somehow entered secure zones of the airport where they could access the aircraft. Airports have multiple security layers, and investigators want to ensure no one bypassed these protections. Compromised Staff: Officials are also looking into whether airport employees, airline staff, or security personnel may have been bribed, threatened, or otherwise influenced to help carry out sabotage. This could include anyone from baggage handlers to maintenance crews to security guards. b.Digital Evidence Being Reviewed Access Control Records: Investigators are examining electronic logs that track who used keycards, badges, or other access devices to enter restricted areas. These digital records show exactly when and where each person entered secure zones. Fingerprint and Biometric Data: Modern airports use fingerprint scanners, facial recognition, and other biometric systems to verify identity. Officials are reviewing all this biological identification data to confirm that only authorized personnel accessed sensitive areas. Security Camera Footage: Teams are carefully studying hours of CCTV recordings from cameras throughout the airport, paying special attention to footage from the hours and days before the flight. This includes cameras monitoring aircraft parking areas, maintenance zones, fuel operations, and other critical locations. Pre-Flight Period Focus: Investigators are particularly interested in activities during the time leading up to departure, when the aircraft was being prepared, fueled, loaded with baggage, and undergo final safety checks. Any suspicious activity during this vulnerable period could be significant. This comprehensive security review helps determine whether the tragic accident resulted from a failure in airport security measures or involved individuals who exploited their trusted positions to cause harm. 5. Investigating Specific Targets on Board Intelligence officials are examining whether the aircraft was deliberately targeted because of specific passengers or the cargo it was carrying. This line of investigation explores whether someone wanted to harm particular individuals or destroy certain items being transported on the flight. a. Why This Aircraft May Have Been Chosen According to CNN News18 sources, investigators are considering whether the AI 171 flight was selected as a target for specific reasons rather than being a random attack on aviation. The aircraft could have been chosen because it carried something or someone that made it a valuable target for those with malicious intent. b. Passenger Background Investigations Security agencies are conducting thorough background checks on all passengers aboard the flight, looking for individuals who might have been specifically targeted: Political Figures: Investigators are checking if any passengers were politicians, government officials, or individuals involved in sensitive political activities who might have had enemies. Intelligence Connections: Officials are examining whether any passengers had connections to intelligence agencies, either as operatives or sources, making them potential targets for foreign adversaries. Legal Sensitivities: The probe includes reviewing if any passengers were involved in high-profile legal cases, such as witnesses in important trials, whistleblowers, or individuals facing legal proceedings who might have been targeted. 6. Cargo Manifest Review Beyond passengers, investigators are also examining the aircraft's cargo manifest - the official list of all items being transported in the plane's cargo hold. This review aims to determine if valuable, sensitive, or strategically important cargo was being shipped that could have made the flight a target. a. Strategic and Symbolic Significance Intelligence sources suggest the investigation is considering whether destroying this particular flight served a broader strategic purpose or a symbolic goal. For example, the crash could have been intended to send a political message, disrupt specific operations, or eliminate multiple targets simultaneously. This comprehensive approach helps investigators understand whether the tragedy was a random act of terrorism or a carefully planned operation targeting specific individuals or cargo on board the aircraft. 6. Foreign Involvement and Electronic Interference a.International Threats Under Investigation Security agencies are examining whether foreign countries or international terrorist groups may have been involved in the crash. Officials are treating this as a potential act of retaliation or a demonstration of hostile capabilities against India. b.Foreign Government Involvement: Investigators are checking if enemy nations or countries with strained relations with India orchestrated the attack as part of broader geopolitical conflicts. Non-State Actors: Officials are also looking into whether international terrorist organisations or criminal groups with no official government backing carried out the sabotage to make a statement or seek revenge for previous actions. 7. Air Traffic Control System Attacks Another major area of investigation involves potential interference with the airport's air traffic control and navigation systems. Modern aircraft rely heavily on electronic signals and communications that can be disrupted by sophisticated attackers. GPS Signal Manipulation: Investigators are checking whether someone used technology to send false GPS signals to the aircraft, potentially causing it to receive incorrect location information that could lead to navigation errors. Communication Jamming: Officials are examining if radio signals between the aircraft and air traffic control were blocked or disrupted, preventing pilots from receiving crucial instructions or emergency guidance. False Control Tower Instructions: The probe includes checking whether attackers impersonated air traffic controllers and sent dangerous or misleading commands to the pilots, potentially causing them to make fatal decisions. This multi-faceted investigation underscores the authorities' unwavering commitment to leaving no stone unturned in determining the true cause of the AI 171 tragedy. By meticulously examining every possibility, from intricate technical failures to sophisticated sabotage, India aims not only to provide closure for the victims' families but also to fortify its aviation security protocols against any future threats, ensuring the highest standards of safety in the skies.

Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol confirmed that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is leading the investigation into the June 12, 2025 crash.&nbsp;

When engines fail: The sabotage shadow over Air India 171

A passenger plane carrying 190 passengers had crashed at the Calicut airport in the southern Indian state of Kerala last year. Now, an investigation has concluded that the crash might have happened due to 'human error'.<o:p></o:p>

The Air India Express was bringing 190 passengers from Dubai to India as part of repatriation flights in times of the Covid pandemic. <o:p></o:p>

During landing, the Boeing 737 skidded off the runway in rain and crashed landed by breaking in two parts. The crash ended up taking lives of 21 people, including both the pilots and injured nearly 75 passengers.

The extensive probe report cited several factors that led to the tragedy. Here are the main points:

<o:p>Bad weather</o:p>

The aircraft was attempting to land repeatedly in bad weather. First attempt was aborted as the pilots did not find the appropriate conditions to land the plane. However, in their final attempt, the investigators claim, the pilots ended up making several violations.

In such bad weather, a miss on the runway can lead to a disastrous outcome, like the one observed during the Calicut crash.

<o:p>Inadequate briefing</o:p>

The report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau claims that the pilots did not carry out "adequate briefing" for landing with tailwinds in the poor weather. The experts believe that a failure to "quickly calculate accurate landing data in adverse weather conditions" led to the deadly crash.

<o:p>In addition, the pilots also failed to "make the mandatory announcement for the cabin crew to be seated on the first approach for landing... This is a very serious omission and compromises cabin crew".</o:p>

The pilot also failed to follow the proper protocol and instead of aborting the landing mission, he continued to descend the plane in unstabilised conditions.&nbsp;

"The probable cause of the accident was the non-adherence to standard operating procedures by the pilot flying, wherein, he continued an unstabilised approach and landed beyond the touchdown zone, halfway down the runway, in spite of a go around call by the pilot monitoring, which warranted a mandatory go around and the failure of the pilot monitoring to take over controls and execute a go around," the report said.

Faulty parts

The windshield wiper of the aircraft was also not functioning properly, the report claims. Experts have concluded that windshield wiper on the PIC side stopped functioning. The pilot in command (PIC) was also recorded giving an unusual detailed briefing to&nbsp;flight officer (FO), which raises doubts that the crew was already familiar with the unreliable windshield but had failed to raise the issue.

<o:p>Landing in heavy rain with a faulty wiper was not an ideal approach and should have been avoided or delayed, the experts believe.</o:p>

Compromise on safety

The pilots and the crew members were seasoned experts who were aware of the Indian monsoon. Even then, the PIC continued for second approach of the&nbsp;Kozhikode runway without assessing the risk involved, the report claims. The FO, too, ignored the violation of the SOP.

In addition to this, the Pilot Monitoring failed to make the mandatory announcement for the cabin crew to be seated during the first approach to the&nbsp;Kozhikode runway, which results in another omission of SOP and puts the lives of cabin crew in danger.

The pilot, experts believe, should have assessed the risk involved due to the Indian monsoon and decided to not to divert even after the 'missed approach'. This decision was taken by the pilots&nbsp;even though alternate airfields were available and the aircraft had enough fuel to redirect.

Unprescribed medicines, cognitive deficits

The report has also hinted that there might be a possibility that the PIC was taking some unprescribed medicines that may have "caused subtle cognitive deficits".

Experts said the PIC was taking anti-diabetic drugs which were not prescribed to him by any doctor and those may have caused&nbsp;mild hypoglycaemia.

This&nbsp;"probably contributed to errors in complex decision making as well as susceptibility to perceptual errors. The possibility of visual illusions causing errors in distance and depth perception cannot be ruled out due to degraded visual cues of orientation due to low visibility and sub optimal performance of the PIC's windshield wiper in rain," the report claims.

Human errors and system failures have contributed to the crash of the aircraft, as per experts. "These usually occur due to prevailing safety culture that give rise to errors, mistakes and violation of routine tasks performed by people operating within the system," the report says.<o:p></o:p>

A passenger plane carrying 190 passengers had crashed at the Calicut airport in the southern Indian state of Kerala last year. Now, an investigation has concluded that the crash might have happened due to 'human error'.

A passenger plane carrying 190 passengers had crashed at the Calicut airport in the southern Indian state of Kerala last year. Now, an investigation has concluded that the crash might have happened due to 'human error'. The Air India Express was bringing 190 passengers from Dubai to India as part of repatriation flights in times of the Covid pandemic. During landing, the Boeing 737 skidded off the runway in rain and crashed landed by breaking in two parts. The crash ended up taking lives of 21 people, including both the pilots and injured nearly 75 passengers. The extensive probe report cited several factors that led to the tragedy. Here are the main points: Bad weather The aircraft was attempting to land repeatedly in bad weather. First attempt was aborted as the pilots did not find the appropriate conditions to land the plane. However, in their final attempt, the investigators claim, the pilots ended up making several violations. In such bad weather, a miss on the runway can lead to a disastrous outcome, like the one observed during the Calicut crash. Inadequate briefing The report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau claims that the pilots did not carry out "adequate briefing" for landing with tailwinds in the poor weather. The experts believe that a failure to "quickly calculate accurate landing data in adverse weather conditions" led to the deadly crash. In addition, the pilots also failed to "make the mandatory announcement for the cabin crew to be seated on the first approach for landing... This is a very serious omission and compromises cabin crew". The pilot also failed to follow the proper protocol and instead of aborting the landing mission, he continued to descend the plane in unstabilised conditions. "The probable cause of the accident was the non-adherence to standard operating procedures by the pilot flying, wherein, he continued an unstabilised approach and landed beyond the touchdown zone, halfway down the runway, in spite of a go around call by the pilot monitoring, which warranted a mandatory go around and the failure of the pilot monitoring to take over controls and execute a go around," the report said. Faulty parts The windshield wiper of the aircraft was also not functioning properly, the report claims. Experts have concluded that windshield wiper on the PIC side stopped functioning. The pilot in command (PIC) was also recorded giving an unusual detailed briefing to flight officer (FO), which raises doubts that the crew was already familiar with the unreliable windshield but had failed to raise the issue. Landing in heavy rain with a faulty wiper was not an ideal approach and should have been avoided or delayed, the experts believe. Compromise on safety The pilots and the crew members were seasoned experts who were aware of the Indian monsoon. Even then, the PIC continued for second approach of the Kozhikode runway without assessing the risk involved, the report claims. The FO, too, ignored the violation of the SOP. In addition to this, the Pilot Monitoring failed to make the mandatory announcement for the cabin crew to be seated during the first approach to the Kozhikode runway, which results in another omission of SOP and puts the lives of cabin crew in danger. The pilot, experts believe, should have assessed the risk involved due to the Indian monsoon and decided to not to divert even after the 'missed approach'. This decision was taken by the pilots even though alternate airfields were available and the aircraft had enough fuel to redirect. Unprescribed medicines, cognitive deficits The report has also hinted that there might be a possibility that the PIC was taking some unprescribed medicines that may have "caused subtle cognitive deficits". Experts said the PIC was taking anti-diabetic drugs which were not prescribed to him by any doctor and those may have caused mild hypoglycaemia. This "probably contributed to errors in complex decision making as well as susceptibility to perceptual errors. The possibility of visual illusions causing errors in distance and depth perception cannot be ruled out due to degraded visual cues of orientation due to low visibility and sub optimal performance of the PIC's windshield wiper in rain," the report claims. Human errors and system failures have contributed to the crash of the aircraft, as per experts. "These usually occur due to prevailing safety culture that give rise to errors, mistakes and violation of routine tasks performed by people operating within the system," the report says.

Calicut: Air India Express crashed because of 'human error' of pilots, report claims

As many as 15 people died as Air India Express plane skidded and broke into two during landing at Kozhikode airport in southern Indian state of Kerala.

Kerala DGP confirmed that 15 people died in the tragic accident.&nbsp;&nbsp;

An official said Air India Express flight IX 1344 operated by B737 took off from Dubai and was heading towards Calicut when this incident happened, adding that there were 191 people in the aircraft, including the cabin crew and pilots.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKING</a> | Dubai-Calicut Air India aircraft skids off the runway after landing at Calicut airport. Ambulances have been deployed for rescue operations. <a href="https://twitter.com/palkisu?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@palkisu</a> gets you the first visuals <a href="https://t.co/ig4OXvZ4Jo">pic.twitter.com/ig4OXvZ4Jo</a>
— WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1291762745214300161?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed his condolences to the ones who lost their loved ones in the incident.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Pained by the plane accident in Kozhikode. My thoughts are with those who lost their loved ones. May the injured recover at the earliest. Spoke to Kerala CM <a href="https://twitter.com/vijayanpinarayi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@vijayanpinarayi</a> Ji regarding the situation. Authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected.
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1291775276599263233?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

He also said he talked to Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan, saying authorities have reached the spot and providing the assistance to the affected.&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Distressed to learn about the tragic accident of Air India Express aircraft in Kozhikode, Kerala. 
 
Have instructed NDRF to reach the site at the earliest and assist with the rescue operations.
— Amit Shah (@AmitShah) <a href="https://twitter.com/AmitShah/status/1291762421661667328?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Union Home Minister Amit Shah called the incident "tragic" in a tweet and said NDRF teams have been instructed at the earliest for the rescue operations.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Air India Express flight from Dubai to Calicut, carrying 174 passengers, 10 infants, two pilots and 5 cabin crew, overshoots runway at Kozhikode. 
 
As per the initial reports rescue operations are on and passengers are being taken to hospital: India's ministry of civil aviation <a href="https://t.co/fXz3PGfCUm">pic.twitter.com/fXz3PGfCUm</a>
— WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1291766331394543617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Kerala CM also spoke on the unfortunate incident, saying the officials have been ordered to carry out rescue and relief work on an urgent basis.&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Have instructed Police and Fire Force to take urgent action in the wake of the plane crash at the Kozhikode International airport (CCJ) in Karipur. Have also directed the officials to make necessary arrangements for rescue and medical support.
— Pinarayi Vijayan (@vijayanpinarayi) <a href="https://twitter.com/vijayanpinarayi/status/1291761476835762182?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

MEA has issued helplines numbers and said they are open 24x7. These numbers are: 1800 118 797; &nbsp;+91 11 23012113; +91 11 23014104; +91 11 23017905; Fax: +91 1123018158. The Kerala government has also tweeted out a list of numbers for people seeking information on passengers. These are: Airport Control Room - 0483 2719493, Malappuram Collectorate - 0483 2736320, Kozhikode Collectorate - 0495 2376901, and Kozhikode Control Room- 0495 2376900, 0495 2376901, 0495 2376902.

As many as 15 people died as Air India Express plane skidded and broke into two during landing at Kozhikode airport in southern Indian state of Kerala. Kerala DGP confirmed that 15 people died in the tragic accident.

As many as 15 people died as Air India Express plane skidded and broke into two during landing at Kozhikode airport in southern Indian state of Kerala. Kerala DGP confirmed that 15 people died in the tragic accident. An official said Air India Express flight IX 1344 operated by B737 took off from Dubai and was heading towards Calicut when this incident happened, adding that there were 191 people in the aircraft, including the cabin crew and pilots. #BREAKING | Dubai-Calicut Air India aircraft skids off the runway after landing at Calicut airport. Ambulances have been deployed for rescue operations. @palkisu gets you the first visuals pic.twitter.com/ig4OXvZ4Jo — WION (@WIONews) August 7, 2020 × Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed his condolences to the ones who lost their loved ones in the incident. Pained by the plane accident in Kozhikode. My thoughts are with those who lost their loved ones. May the injured recover at the earliest. Spoke to Kerala CM @vijayanpinarayi Ji regarding the situation. Authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected. — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) August 7, 2020 × He also said he talked to Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan, saying authorities have reached the spot and providing the assistance to the affected. Distressed to learn about the tragic accident of Air India Express aircraft in Kozhikode, Kerala. Have instructed NDRF to reach the site at the earliest and assist with the rescue operations. — Amit Shah (@AmitShah) August 7, 2020 × Union Home Minister Amit Shah called the incident "tragic" in a tweet and said NDRF teams have been instructed at the earliest for the rescue operations. Air India Express flight from Dubai to Calicut, carrying 174 passengers, 10 infants, two pilots and 5 cabin crew, overshoots runway at Kozhikode. As per the initial reports rescue operations are on and passengers are being taken to hospital: India's ministry of civil aviation pic.twitter.com/fXz3PGfCUm — WION (@WIONews) August 7, 2020 × Kerala CM also spoke on the unfortunate incident, saying the officials have been ordered to carry out rescue and relief work on an urgent basis. Have instructed Police and Fire Force to take urgent action in the wake of the plane crash at the Kozhikode International airport (CCJ) in Karipur. Have also directed the officials to make necessary arrangements for rescue and medical support. — Pinarayi Vijayan (@vijayanpinarayi) August 7, 2020 × MEA has issued helplines numbers and said they are open 24x7. These numbers are: 1800 118 797; +91 11 23012113; +91 11 23014104; +91 11 23017905; Fax: +91 1123018158. The Kerala government has also tweeted out a list of numbers for people seeking information on passengers. These are: Airport Control Room - 0483 2719493, Malappuram Collectorate - 0483 2736320, Kozhikode Collectorate - 0495 2376901, and Kozhikode Control Room- 0495 2376900, 0495 2376901, 0495 2376902.

At least 15 dead, including pilot in plane crash at Kerala airport

President Ram Nath Kovind, Vice President Venkaiah Naidu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi along with leaders from across the political spectrum expressed anguish on Friday over the Air India Express aircraft accident in Kozhikode and offered condolences to the families of those killed in the tragedy.

At least 16 people were killed and several others injured when a Dubai-Calicut Air India Express flight with 191 passengers and crew members on board overshot the runway at the airport in Kozhikode and fell into a valley, breaking into two portions, police sources said.

President Kovind said he was deeply distressed to hear about the tragic plane accident and his thoughts and prayers were with the affected passengers, crew members and their families.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Deeply distressed to hear about the tragic plane crash of Air India Express flight at Kozhikode, Kerala. Spoke to <a href="https://twitter.com/KeralaGovernor?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KeralaGovernor</a> Shri Arif Mohammed Khan and inquired about the situation. Thoughts and prayers with affected passengers, crew members and their families.
— President of India (@rashtrapatibhvn) <a href="https://twitter.com/rashtrapatibhvn/status/1291778492774793216?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Kovind said he spoke to Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan and enquired about the situation there.

Vice President Venkaiah Naidu said he was deeply anguished by the loss of lives in the tragic air mishap.

"My heartfelt condolences to the families who lost their dear ones in the crash &amp; prayers for the speedy recovery of the injured," he said.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also expressed anguish at the Air India Express aircraft accident and said authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected.

He also spoke with Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan in this regard.

"Pained by the plane accident in Kozhikode. My thoughts are with those who lost their loved ones. May the injured recover at the earliest," the prime minister tweeted.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Pained by the plane accident in Kozhikode. My thoughts are with those who lost their loved ones. May the injured recover at the earliest. Spoke to Kerala CM <a href="https://twitter.com/vijayanpinarayi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@vijayanpinarayi</a> Ji regarding the situation. Authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected.
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1291775276599263233?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected, Modi said.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said he was "deeply distressed" to hear about the tragedy at Kozhikode.

"Prayers are with the bereaved families and those injured. We are ascertaining further details," Jaishankar said in a tweet.

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh expressed deep anguish over the loss of lives due to an accident.

"In this hour of grief, my thoughts are with the bereaved families. I pray for the speedy recovery of the injured," he said.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi expressed shock at the news of the flight skidding off the tabletop runway and offered condolences to the families of those who died in the accident.

"Shocked at the devastating news of the plane mishap in Kozhikode. Deepest condolences to the friends and family of those who died in this accident. Prayers for the speedy recovery of the injured," he said on Twitter.

"My thoughts are with the crew, the passengers and their families and friends at this time," he said.

Congress general secretary, in-charge organization, KC Venugopal described it as a "shocking incident" and said the governments must take all necessary measures for emergency rescue and help.

"I have already requested the Ministry of Civil Aviation to order an immediate enquiry to find out the exact reasons behind the shocking accident. Emergency medical care and assistance should be ensured for the injured and financial assistance should be declared for the deceased," he said.

Congress general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said, "My heart goes out to the crew and passengers of the Air India plane that has crashed in Calicut and to their families. Our prayers are with you at this tragic and painful moment."

BJP leader and former Union minister Alphons K J said this was the second tragedy of the day in Kerala after the landslide in Rajamalai.

"Air India Express skids off the run way at Kozhikode, front portion splits, pilot dies and lots of passengers injured. All passengers evacuated. Very lucky the aircraft didn't catch fire," he said on Twitter.

The mishap occurred at 1941 hours. No fire was reported at the time of landing, an AIE statement said. 
Police said the dead included the plane's pilot.

There were 174 passengers, 10 infants, two pilots and five cabin crew on board the aircraft, the Civil Aviation Ministry said.&nbsp;

President Ram Nath Kovind, Vice President Venkaiah Naidu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi along with leaders from across the political spectrum expressed anguish on Friday over the Air India Express aircraft accident in Kozhikode and offered condolences to the families of those killed in the tragedy.

President Ram Nath Kovind, Vice President Venkaiah Naidu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi along with leaders from across the political spectrum expressed anguish on Friday over the Air India Express aircraft accident in Kozhikode and offered condolences to the families of those killed in the tragedy. At least 16 people were killed and several others injured when a Dubai-Calicut Air India Express flight with 191 passengers and crew members on board overshot the runway at the airport in Kozhikode and fell into a valley, breaking into two portions, police sources said. President Kovind said he was deeply distressed to hear about the tragic plane accident and his thoughts and prayers were with the affected passengers, crew members and their families. Deeply distressed to hear about the tragic plane crash of Air India Express flight at Kozhikode, Kerala. Spoke to @KeralaGovernor Shri Arif Mohammed Khan and inquired about the situation. Thoughts and prayers with affected passengers, crew members and their families. — President of India (@rashtrapatibhvn) August 7, 2020 × Kovind said he spoke to Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan and enquired about the situation there. Vice President Venkaiah Naidu said he was deeply anguished by the loss of lives in the tragic air mishap. "My heartfelt condolences to the families who lost their dear ones in the crash & prayers for the speedy recovery of the injured," he said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi also expressed anguish at the Air India Express aircraft accident and said authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected. He also spoke with Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan in this regard. "Pained by the plane accident in Kozhikode. My thoughts are with those who lost their loved ones. May the injured recover at the earliest," the prime minister tweeted. Pained by the plane accident in Kozhikode. My thoughts are with those who lost their loved ones. May the injured recover at the earliest. Spoke to Kerala CM @vijayanpinarayi Ji regarding the situation. Authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected. — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) August 7, 2020 × Authorities are at the spot, providing all assistance to the affected, Modi said. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said he was "deeply distressed" to hear about the tragedy at Kozhikode. "Prayers are with the bereaved families and those injured. We are ascertaining further details," Jaishankar said in a tweet. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh expressed deep anguish over the loss of lives due to an accident. "In this hour of grief, my thoughts are with the bereaved families. I pray for the speedy recovery of the injured," he said. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi expressed shock at the news of the flight skidding off the tabletop runway and offered condolences to the families of those who died in the accident. "Shocked at the devastating news of the plane mishap in Kozhikode. Deepest condolences to the friends and family of those who died in this accident. Prayers for the speedy recovery of the injured," he said on Twitter. "My thoughts are with the crew, the passengers and their families and friends at this time," he said. Congress general secretary, in-charge organization, KC Venugopal described it as a "shocking incident" and said the governments must take all necessary measures for emergency rescue and help. "I have already requested the Ministry of Civil Aviation to order an immediate enquiry to find out the exact reasons behind the shocking accident. Emergency medical care and assistance should be ensured for the injured and financial assistance should be declared for the deceased," he said. Congress general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said, "My heart goes out to the crew and passengers of the Air India plane that has crashed in Calicut and to their families. Our prayers are with you at this tragic and painful moment." BJP leader and former Union minister Alphons K J said this was the second tragedy of the day in Kerala after the landslide in Rajamalai. "Air India Express skids off the run way at Kozhikode, front portion splits, pilot dies and lots of passengers injured. All passengers evacuated. Very lucky the aircraft didn't catch fire," he said on Twitter. The mishap occurred at 1941 hours. No fire was reported at the time of landing, an AIE statement said. Police said the dead included the plane's pilot. There were 174 passengers, 10 infants, two pilots and five cabin crew on board the aircraft, the Civil Aviation Ministry said.

Kerala plane tragedy: Prez, VP, PM express sadness, condole loss of lives

air-india-crash

Air India Crash, News on Air India Crash, stories on Air India Crash, articles on Air India Crash, Air India Crash stories at Wion, Air India Crash news, Air India Crash latest news

air india-crash

Ahmedabad Air India crash probe draft report likely by October, AAIB opposes release of cockpit recordings

What is RAT? The emergency system at the centre of Air India crash probe

Pilots’ body flags gaps in Air India crash report, calls for fresh probe

AAIB denies report claiming investigation in Air India AI-171 crash is complete

Ahmedabad plane crash: AI starts returning victims’ belongings to kin of victims

Potomac River collision to Air India crash: Biggest aviation disasters of 2025

Pahalgam attack, Air India crash, Delhi blast: Events that shook India in 2025

Air India crash probe: Indian, US officials to meet in Washington?

'Dangerous' toxins found in bodies of Air India crash victims repatriated to UK

‘Nobody can blame pilot’: Supreme Court issues notice on Air India crash probe

Air India crash's sole survivor describes trauma of his brother's death

Air India Crash: SC demands 'impartial & expeditious' probe, seeks govt response

263 safety faults across Indian airlines; Air India among worst-hit - DGCA audit

Air India plane crash: US aviation body denies fuel control unit mechanical issue in Boeing plane

Air India Ahmedabad crash: Tata Sons creates Rs 500 crore trust for victims

AAIB refutes US media report on Air India crash, warns against early narratives

AI pilots accidentally shut engines? Switch-flip, 1-sec gap confound experts

Both engines shut down within seconds of takeoff: AAIB report on Air India crash

‘Preliminary report’ on Ahmedabad plane crash goes viral. PIB fact checks

Air India pilots simulate AI-171’s final moments to find flaw. Did they succeed?

When engines fail: The sabotage shadow over Air India 171

Calicut: Air India Express crashed because of 'human error' of pilots, report claims

At least 15 dead, including pilot in plane crash at Kerala airport

Kerala plane tragedy: Prez, VP, PM express sadness, condole loss of lives