US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Washington and Tehran could sign an agreement within the next 48 hours, indicating that negotiations aimed at ending nearly four months of conflict are approaching a conclusion.&nbsp;Speaking to reporters in Paris during the G7 summit in France, Trump said he expected the agreement with Iran to "be signed shortly, tomorrow, maybe the next day".&nbsp;He added that he could remain in Europe for the signing ceremony, although he noted that because the agreement is currently a memorandum of understanding, "it might not be the kind of a document I should be signing".<h3>Trump says US forces will remain in the Gulf region</h3>Despite progress towards an agreement, Trump said US military forces would continue operating in the Gulf region “for a while”.&nbsp;The president indicated that the American military presence would remain in place while both countries work to implement the agreement and pursue a broader settlement.&nbsp;Trump also commented on Iran's ballistic missile programme, saying it would be "a little bit unfair" for Tehran to be denied such capabilities while other countries continue to possess them.&nbsp;On the timeline for reaching a permanent settlement, Trump said he did not regard the 60-day period outlined in the memorandum of understanding as a fixed deadline.&nbsp;Asked whether the timeframe was binding, Trump replied: "I don't view it as hard. ... Just as long as they're behaving, I really don't care that much."<h3>Tehran reviews presidential signing proposal</h3>The framework agreement calls for both sides to negotiate a binding settlement within 60 days. However, Trump suggested that continued progress in the talks was more important than adhering strictly to the timeline.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-officials-read-mou-with-iran-to-journalists-tehran-suggests-trump-and-pezeshkian-sign-1781718961750">US officials read MoU with Iran to journalists; Tehran suggests Trump and Pezeshkian sign</a>&nbsp;Meanwhile, Iran's foreign ministry said it was examining a proposal under which the presidents of both countries would sign the agreement ending the conflict.&nbsp;"So far, our plans for the Geneva meeting have not changed," foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said.&nbsp;"Regarding the signing of the memorandum of understanding, one idea is that it be done by the presidents of the two countries, which is currently under review."&nbsp;Iran has previously stated that the United States would be represented at the Switzerland meeting by Vice President JD Vance, while the parliament speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf would represent Tehran.

Iran's foreign ministry said it is considering a proposal for the US and Iranian presidents to sign the agreement ending the conflict, with any presidential signing likely to take place remotely while plans for the Geneva meeting remain unchanged.

US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Washington and Tehran could sign an agreement within the next 48 hours, indicating that negotiations aimed at ending nearly four months of conflict are approaching a conclusion. Speaking to reporters in Paris during the G7 summit in France, Trump said he expected the agreement with Iran to "be signed shortly, tomorrow, maybe the next day". He added that he could remain in Europe for the signing ceremony, although he noted that because the agreement is currently a memorandum of understanding, "it might not be the kind of a document I should be signing". Trump says US forces will remain in the Gulf region Despite progress towards an agreement, Trump said US military forces would continue operating in the Gulf region “for a while”. The president indicated that the American military presence would remain in place while both countries work to implement the agreement and pursue a broader settlement. Trump also commented on Iran's ballistic missile programme, saying it would be "a little bit unfair" for Tehran to be denied such capabilities while other countries continue to possess them. On the timeline for reaching a permanent settlement, Trump said he did not regard the 60-day period outlined in the memorandum of understanding as a fixed deadline. Asked whether the timeframe was binding, Trump replied: "I don't view it as hard. ... Just as long as they're behaving, I really don't care that much." Tehran reviews presidential signing proposal The framework agreement calls for both sides to negotiate a binding settlement within 60 days. However, Trump suggested that continued progress in the talks was more important than adhering strictly to the timeline. Also Read: US officials read MoU with Iran to journalists; Tehran suggests Trump and Pezeshkian sign Meanwhile, Iran's foreign ministry said it was examining a proposal under which the presidents of both countries would sign the agreement ending the conflict. "So far, our plans for the Geneva meeting have not changed," foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said. "Regarding the signing of the memorandum of understanding, one idea is that it be done by the presidents of the two countries, which is currently under review." Iran has previously stated that the United States would be represented at the Switzerland meeting by Vice President JD Vance, while the parliament speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf would represent Tehran.

Iran's foreign ministry said it is considering a proposal for the US and Iranian presidents to sign the agreement ending the conflict, with any presidential signing likely to take place remotely while plans for the Geneva meeting remain unchanged.

Trump says Iran deal will be signed within 48 hours; Tehran weighs presidential signing

US President Donald Trump has invoked the Defence Production Act to accelerate the production of weapons and military equipment, citing concerns over the country's ability to maintain and expand critical munitions stockpiles after recent conflicts.&nbsp;In a document signed last week and addressed to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump said he had determined that circumstances existed that could threaten US national defence preparedness.&nbsp;He wrote that he finds “that conditions exist which may pose a direct threat to the national defence or its preparedness programs.”&nbsp;The document pointed to weaknesses within the US munitions industry, including limited manufacturing capacity, supply chain vulnerabilities, long production timelines and other bottlenecks that could affect military readiness.&nbsp;“In particular, systemic constraints in the munitions industrial base, including limited production capacity, fragile supply chains, long-lead dependencies, and related production bottlenecks, may impair the ability of the United States to produce, sustain, and expand the availability of munitions, missiles, and equipment required for the national defence,” the document said.&nbsp;The move allows the administration to direct private defence companies to prioritise and increase production of military equipment. It also highlights growing concerns within the administration about the state of US weapons reserves following the war with Iran, as well as continued military support provided during the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine.&nbsp;Concerns over the defence industry's production capacity have existed for years, but officials and experts told CNN that those worries intensified after the conflict with Iran, during which the US consumed significant quantities of key missile stockpiles.&nbsp;Speaking from the G7 summit in France on Wednesday, Trump described the final phase of the conflict as intense and costly.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/if-they-were-attacked-we-d-be-there-to-help-them-trump-reaffirms-defence-ties-with-india-1781709163917">‘If they were attacked, we'd be there to help them,' Trump reaffirms defence ties with India</a>&nbsp;“The last two days of the war were brutal,” Trump said, adding that “$200 million worth of bombs” were used.&nbsp;Throughout the conflict, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and other Pentagon officials maintained publicly that the United States possessed sufficient resources to conduct military operations while meeting commitments elsewhere.&nbsp;According to a recent analysis by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the US used at least 45% of its Precision Strike Missile inventory, along with roughly half of its Patriot air defence interceptor missiles and THAAD missile stockpiles.<h2>What is the Defence Production Act?</h2>The Defence Production Act, first enacted in the 1950s, gives the president broad authority to strengthen industrial production for national security purposes. It enables the government to require companies to prioritise critical contracts, support the production of essential materials and enter into agreements with private industry to meet defence needs.&nbsp;The law has been used by multiple administrations. Trump invoked it during the COVID-19 pandemic to increase ventilator production and later to support domestic mineral development. Former President Joe Biden also used the Act to speed up the production of clean energy technologies in the United States.

A recent analysis by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies found that the US depleted at least 45% of its Precision Strike Missile stockpile and around half of its Patriot and THAAD missile inventories.

US President Donald Trump has invoked the Defence Production Act to accelerate the production of weapons and military equipment, citing concerns over the country's ability to maintain and expand critical munitions stockpiles after recent conflicts. In a document signed last week and addressed to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump said he had determined that circumstances existed that could threaten US national defence preparedness. He wrote that he finds “that conditions exist which may pose a direct threat to the national defence or its preparedness programs.” The document pointed to weaknesses within the US munitions industry, including limited manufacturing capacity, supply chain vulnerabilities, long production timelines and other bottlenecks that could affect military readiness. “In particular, systemic constraints in the munitions industrial base, including limited production capacity, fragile supply chains, long-lead dependencies, and related production bottlenecks, may impair the ability of the United States to produce, sustain, and expand the availability of munitions, missiles, and equipment required for the national defence,” the document said. The move allows the administration to direct private defence companies to prioritise and increase production of military equipment. It also highlights growing concerns within the administration about the state of US weapons reserves following the war with Iran, as well as continued military support provided during the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine. Concerns over the defence industry's production capacity have existed for years, but officials and experts told CNN that those worries intensified after the conflict with Iran, during which the US consumed significant quantities of key missile stockpiles. Speaking from the G7 summit in France on Wednesday, Trump described the final phase of the conflict as intense and costly. Also Read: ‘If they were attacked, we'd be there to help them,' Trump reaffirms defence ties with India “The last two days of the war were brutal,” Trump said, adding that “$200 million worth of bombs” were used. Throughout the conflict, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and other Pentagon officials maintained publicly that the United States possessed sufficient resources to conduct military operations while meeting commitments elsewhere. According to a recent analysis by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the US used at least 45% of its Precision Strike Missile inventory, along with roughly half of its Patriot air defence interceptor missiles and THAAD missile stockpiles. What is the Defence Production Act? The Defence Production Act, first enacted in the 1950s, gives the president broad authority to strengthen industrial production for national security purposes. It enables the government to require companies to prioritise critical contracts, support the production of essential materials and enter into agreements with private industry to meet defence needs. The law has been used by multiple administrations. Trump invoked it during the COVID-19 pandemic to increase ventilator production and later to support domestic mineral development. Former President Joe Biden also used the Act to speed up the production of clean energy technologies in the United States.

A recent analysis by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies found that the US depleted at least 45% of its Precision Strike Missile stockpile and around half of its Patriot and THAAD missile inventories.

Trump invokes Cold War-era law after Iran war depletes weapon stockpiles: What is the Act?

US President Donald Trump warned on Tuesday that “all hell will rain down” on Iran if it attempts to procure a nuclear weapon. Referring to the agreement with Tehra, Trump said that his primary concern is ensuring that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon, adding that the ‌proposed agreement makes that objective unmistakably clear. According to several media reports, Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes and has not publicly committed to surrendering its stockpile of enriched uranium. It is believed to be buried under three nuclear facilities that suffered extensive damage after the US launched strikes last year. Trump is also under considerable political pressure to secure a stronger agreement than the one he abandoned during his first term. In 2018, he withdrew the United States from the 2015 nuclear accord negotiated under former President Barack Obama. The deal had eased sanctions on Tehran in exchange for restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities and international monitoring of its programme.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-says-permanent-end-to-war-in-lebanon-is-inseparable-from-us-peace-deal-1781598676054">Iran says permanent end to war in Lebanon is inseparable from US peace deal</a> Following the US withdrawal, Iran significantly expanded its uranium enrichment efforts, accumulating more than 400 kilograms of material enriched to near weapons-grade levels. The future of that uranium stockpile is expected to be one of the central issues in the upcoming round of broader negotiations. &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump warned that “all hell will rain down” on Iran if it seeks a nuclear weapon. He said any future deal must ensure Tehran never acquires one. Iran, however, continues to insist its nuclear programme is peaceful despite concerns over its uranium stockpile.

US President Donald Trump warned on Tuesday that “all hell will rain down” on Iran if it attempts to procure a nuclear weapon. Referring to the agreement with Tehra, Trump said that his primary concern is ensuring that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon, adding that the ‌proposed agreement makes that objective unmistakably clear. According to several media reports, Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes and has not publicly committed to surrendering its stockpile of enriched uranium. It is believed to be buried under three nuclear facilities that suffered extensive damage after the US launched strikes last year. Trump is also under considerable political pressure to secure a stronger agreement than the one he abandoned during his first term. In 2018, he withdrew the United States from the 2015 nuclear accord negotiated under former President Barack Obama. The deal had eased sanctions on Tehran in exchange for restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities and international monitoring of its programme. Also read: Iran says permanent end to war in Lebanon is inseparable from US peace deal Following the US withdrawal, Iran significantly expanded its uranium enrichment efforts, accumulating more than 400 kilograms of material enriched to near weapons-grade levels. The future of that uranium stockpile is expected to be one of the central issues in the upcoming round of broader negotiations.

US President Donald Trump warned that “all hell will rain down” on Iran if it seeks a nuclear weapon. He said any future deal must ensure Tehran never acquires one. Iran, however, continues to insist its nuclear programme is peaceful despite concerns over its uranium stockpile.

Donald Trump warns ‘all hell will rain down’ if Iran pursues nuclear weapons

CIA Director John Ratcliffe reportedly warned US President Donald Trump and other senior officials in the administration that Iran is not necessarily willing to make nuclear concessions despite reaching a peace deal between Washington and Tehran. The development has raised doubts on Iran’s willingness to commit to the deal that led to the “permanent” end of the conflict that has shaken the Middle East and disrupted global energy supply. The peace agreement between Iran and the United States was announced on Sunday (Jun 14) after more than three months of tensions in the Gulf.According to an Axios report, citing sources, Ratcliffe has expressed scepticism based on evidence gathered by the US intelligence agencies. The report further suggested a rift within the administration, adding that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth had also expressed concerns, raising questions on the memorandum of understanding (MoU). On the other hand, Vice President Vance and US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have advocated for it, the report added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/very-difficult-guy-trump-says-netanyahu-nearly-derailed-us-iran-peace-deal-1781514228475">‘Very difficult guy’: Trump says Netanyahu nearly derailed US-Iran peace deal</a><h2>What did the report reveal?</h2>Reportedly, there were a series of high-level meetings held between the US president and his advisors before the deal was announced. During those meetings, Trump and his top officials discussed intel that suggested that the way Iranian officials were discussing the deal among themselves was inconsistent with what they were telling the mediators and the US, the report added.“The intelligence reflects that the Iranian intentions are not in line with their commitments under the deal,” Axios quoted a source as saying.In response to the report, a White House official said, “President Trump listens to all opinions on any given issue – but everyone understands he is the final decision-maker.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-peace-deal-inside-the-14-point-mou-that-ended-over-108-days-of-war-wion-decodes-donald-trump-mojtaba-khamenei-benjamin-netanyahu-lebanon-1781513800001">US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes</a><h2>Trump officials to hold talks with Iranians</h2>The report added that Vance, Witkoff and Kushner are expected to meet with Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Friday to discuss the next elements of the deal, which are to be worked out in line with the MoU.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

CIA director John Ratcliffe reportedly warned President Donald Trump that Iran may resist nuclear concessions despite a new peace deal, exposing divisions within the US administration over Tehran's commitment.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe reportedly warned US President Donald Trump and other senior officials in the administration that Iran is not necessarily willing to make nuclear concessions despite reaching a peace deal between Washington and Tehran. The development has raised doubts on Iran’s willingness to commit to the deal that led to the “permanent” end of the conflict that has shaken the Middle East and disrupted global energy supply. The peace agreement between Iran and the United States was announced on Sunday (Jun 14) after more than three months of tensions in the Gulf. According to an Axios report, citing sources, Ratcliffe has expressed scepticism based on evidence gathered by the US intelligence agencies. The report further suggested a rift within the administration, adding that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth had also expressed concerns, raising questions on the memorandum of understanding (MoU). On the other hand, Vice President Vance and US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have advocated for it, the report added. Also read | ‘Very difficult guy’: Trump says Netanyahu nearly derailed US-Iran peace deal What did the report reveal? Reportedly, there were a series of high-level meetings held between the US president and his advisors before the deal was announced. During those meetings, Trump and his top officials discussed intel that suggested that the way Iranian officials were discussing the deal among themselves was inconsistent with what they were telling the mediators and the US, the report added. “The intelligence reflects that the Iranian intentions are not in line with their commitments under the deal,” Axios quoted a source as saying. In response to the report, a White House official said, “President Trump listens to all opinions on any given issue – but everyone understands he is the final decision-maker.” Also read | US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes Trump officials to hold talks with Iranians The report added that Vance, Witkoff and Kushner are expected to meet with Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Friday to discuss the next elements of the deal, which are to be worked out in line with the MoU. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

CIA director John Ratcliffe reportedly warned President Donald Trump that Iran may resist nuclear concessions despite a new peace deal, exposing divisions within the US administration over Tehran's commitment.

A rift within Trump admin? Report claims CIA director, top officials doubt Iran’s commitment to peace deal

#Gravitas A tentative peace agreement between the United States and Iran has sparked a broad rally across global financial markets. Investors welcomed reports that the deal would keep the strategic Strait of Hormuz open, reducing fears of a prolonged disruption to global energy supplies.


US-Iran Peace Deal: Global Stocks Rally on Peace Breakthrough

US Vice President JD Vance claimed that “some element within Israel” like the US-Iran deal “quite a bit". During a CNBC interview, Vance responded to widespread condemnation from Israeli politicians across the political spectrum. Vance claims that the criticism has to do with “misreporting” from the Iranian media in an attempt to sell it to the domestic audience. He further added that a full copy of the MoU will be released later in the week. According to Vance, the deal will create “a new Middle East” in which “Israel is going to have a seat at the table.”Earlier in an interview with CBS News, Vance said that Netanyahu "aggressively asserts the interests of his country" but that they were not always aligned with those of the US. “But, even when we've been close partners, sometimes we have interests that are perfectly aligned, and sometimes we have interests that are misaligned,” said Vance. "And what I've seen with the prime minister is that he aggressively asserts the interests of his country- sometimes that means we're on the same page, sometimes it means we're not."Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/modi-response-indian-sailors-deaths-khobragade-comparison-1781510283032">From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to Washington changed?</a>He said that in those times the US had to focus on its own interests, "and where that diverges, we - unfortunately for the Israelis - have to choose the side of the American people".Israel has vehemently denied the US-Iran agreement, saying that it is not bound by the same. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich slammed the agreement on X, calling it "bad for Israel and for the entire free world. Period." Smotrich insisted Israel must continue its own campaign to topple the Iranian regime. Israel has claimed that it will maintain a military presence in Lebanon. Prior to the signing, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the defence ministry instructed the Israeli military to prepare for independent action against Iran's nuclear program. Iran maintains that the United States bears the direct "responsibility" for implementing the newly announced peace deal and controlling Israel's military actions.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">JD Vance: I think there are elements within Israel that, like, the deal quite a bit. One of the interesting things about the Iranian state media is that sometimes you&#39;ll have hardline elements really aiming at a domestic audience trying to sell the deal and in some ways… <a href="https://t.co/5A0PBXrHVy">pic.twitter.com/5A0PBXrHVy</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://x.com/clashreport/status/2066504556373012675?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US Vice President JD Vance said that some elements within Israel like the US-Iran agreement "quite a bit," despite criticism from Israeli politicians. Vance said the deal could create a "new Middle East" while ensuring Israel retains a seat at the table.

US Vice President JD Vance claimed that “some element within Israel” like the US-Iran deal “quite a bit". During a CNBC interview, Vance responded to widespread condemnation from Israeli politicians across the political spectrum. Vance claims that the criticism has to do with “misreporting” from the Iranian media in an attempt to sell it to the domestic audience. He further added that a full copy of the MoU will be released later in the week. According to Vance, the deal will create “a new Middle East” in which “Israel is going to have a seat at the table.” Earlier in an interview with CBS News, Vance said that Netanyahu "aggressively asserts the interests of his country" but that they were not always aligned with those of the US. “But, even when we've been close partners, sometimes we have interests that are perfectly aligned, and sometimes we have interests that are misaligned,” said Vance. "And what I've seen with the prime minister is that he aggressively asserts the interests of his country- sometimes that means we're on the same page, sometimes it means we're not." Also Read: From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to Washington changed? He said that in those times the US had to focus on its own interests, "and where that diverges, we - unfortunately for the Israelis - have to choose the side of the American people". Israel has vehemently denied the US-Iran agreement, saying that it is not bound by the same. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich slammed the agreement on X, calling it "bad for Israel and for the entire free world. Period." Smotrich insisted Israel must continue its own campaign to topple the Iranian regime. Israel has claimed that it will maintain a military presence in Lebanon. Prior to the signing, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the defence ministry instructed the Israeli military to prepare for independent action against Iran's nuclear program. Iran maintains that the United States bears the direct "responsibility" for implementing the newly announced peace deal and controlling Israel's military actions.

US Vice President JD Vance said that some elements within Israel like the US-Iran agreement "quite a bit," despite criticism from Israeli politicians. Vance said the deal could create a "new Middle East" while ensuring Israel retains a seat at the table.

JD Vance says some in Israel like US-Iran deal 'quite a bit' despite backlash

As US President Donald Trump declared that he was ready to sign a peace agreement with Iran, fresh details have emerged about the framework of a potential deal under discussion between Tehran and Washington. While there were no signs on Sunday (June 14) that an agreement was imminent, contrary to Trump’s assertion a day earlier, it was reported that negotiators had drafted a memorandum of understanding covering Iran’s nuclear programme, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and relief from US sanctions.According to a senior Iranian official reported by Reuters, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the memorandum would serve as an interim arrangement while both sides continue negotiations on a comprehensive agreement over the following 60 days.<h2>Reopening the Strait of Hormuz</h2>A key component of the proposed deal centres on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important maritime routes for energy exports. The Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran would immediately reopen the waterway to international shipping once the memorandum is signed. In return, the United States would begin lifting its naval blockade on Iranian ports, which was imposed on April 17.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tehran-not-yet-taken-its-final-decision-iranian-media-reports-on-peace-deal-with-us-this-is-what-we-know-1781434562907">‘Tehran not yet taken its final decision’: Iranian media reports on peace deal with US. This is what we know</a>The easing of the blockade would start immediately after the signing and be completed within 30 days, according to the official. The proposal also includes plans to remove mines from the waterway following an agreement. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical transit route through which roughly one-fifth of global energy supplies pass.<h2>Sanctions relief and economic measures</h2>Under the draft framework, Washington would refrain from imposing any new sanctions on Iran while talks on a final settlement continue. The Iranian official said that once a comprehensive agreement is reached, the United States and its allies would begin lifting both US and United Nations sanctions according to a mutually agreed timetable. The proposal also envisages a temporary waiver of US oil sanctions, allowing Iran to resume oil exports and gain access to related revenues.In addition, America would facilitate the release of around $25 billion in frozen Iranian assets through a combination of direct transfers, regional financial arrangements and credit mechanisms, the official said. The framework further includes plans for a reconstruction and economic development programme for Iran, to be prepared by the United States and its regional partners and finalised within 60 days through negotiations with Tehran.<h2>Nuclear commitments</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/hormuz-services-must-be-paid-for-iran-calls-blocked-funds-part-of-peace-deal-as-trump-warns-of-ultimate-alternative-1781371786544">'Hormuz services MUST be paid for': Iran calls blocked funds part of peace deal as Trump warns of ‘ultimate alternative’</a>On the nuclear front, Iran would formally commit to not developing or acquiring nuclear weapons under the proposed arrangement. Pending a final agreement, Tehran would maintain the current status of its nuclear programme and refrain from further uranium enrichment or expanding its nuclear facilities, according to the Iranian official. The US would also permit Iran, under a future comprehensive deal, to dilute its existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium within the country.

US President Donald Trump announced his readiness to sign an interim peace memorandum with Iran, proposing a 60-day negotiation window, sanctions relief, asset release, and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

As US President Donald Trump declared that he was ready to sign a peace agreement with Iran, fresh details have emerged about the framework of a potential deal under discussion between Tehran and Washington. While there were no signs on Sunday (June 14) that an agreement was imminent, contrary to Trump’s assertion a day earlier, it was reported that negotiators had drafted a memorandum of understanding covering Iran’s nuclear programme, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and relief from US sanctions. According to a senior Iranian official reported by Reuters, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the memorandum would serve as an interim arrangement while both sides continue negotiations on a comprehensive agreement over the following 60 days. Reopening the Strait of Hormuz A key component of the proposed deal centres on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important maritime routes for energy exports. The Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran would immediately reopen the waterway to international shipping once the memorandum is signed. In return, the United States would begin lifting its naval blockade on Iranian ports, which was imposed on April 17. Also read: ‘Tehran not yet taken its final decision’: Iranian media reports on peace deal with US. This is what we know The easing of the blockade would start immediately after the signing and be completed within 30 days, according to the official. The proposal also includes plans to remove mines from the waterway following an agreement. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical transit route through which roughly one-fifth of global energy supplies pass. Sanctions relief and economic measures Under the draft framework, Washington would refrain from imposing any new sanctions on Iran while talks on a final settlement continue. The Iranian official said that once a comprehensive agreement is reached, the United States and its allies would begin lifting both US and United Nations sanctions according to a mutually agreed timetable. The proposal also envisages a temporary waiver of US oil sanctions, allowing Iran to resume oil exports and gain access to related revenues. In addition, America would facilitate the release of around $25 billion in frozen Iranian assets through a combination of direct transfers, regional financial arrangements and credit mechanisms, the official said. The framework further includes plans for a reconstruction and economic development programme for Iran, to be prepared by the United States and its regional partners and finalised within 60 days through negotiations with Tehran. Nuclear commitments Also read: 'Hormuz services MUST be paid for': Iran calls blocked funds part of peace deal as Trump warns of ‘ultimate alternative’ On the nuclear front, Iran would formally commit to not developing or acquiring nuclear weapons under the proposed arrangement. Pending a final agreement, Tehran would maintain the current status of its nuclear programme and refrain from further uranium enrichment or expanding its nuclear facilities, according to the Iranian official. The US would also permit Iran, under a future comprehensive deal, to dilute its existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium within the country.

US President Donald Trump announced his readiness to sign an interim peace memorandum with Iran, proposing a 60-day negotiation window, sanctions relief, asset release, and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

Inside the Iran deal that Trump is READY to sign | WION Decodes

US President Donald Trump has hinted that the final terms on the deal with Iran has been agreed on by the top Iranian leadership. Even as Iran said that the final agreement has not been made, an Axios report has stated what is inside the new deal. Trump on Thursday (June 11) declared that he has "ended the war with Iran." He made the statement during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones. Trump added that Iran agreed they will never have nuclear weapons. Earlier, Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-ended-the-war-today-trump-s-big-declaration-after-halting-iran-strikes-what-s-really-happening-1781229576328">'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes</a><h2>What's in the deal?</h2>The US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) states that MOU would extend the ceasefire for 60 days. It states clearly that ceasefire includes in Lebanon. The deal also includes that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened immediately without tolls. Axios quoted one of the official from the mediating countries and said that Iran will receive sanctions relief based on compliance. The text includes a framework for addressing Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, though any action on Iran's nuclear program would depend on a second, more detailed accord. Under the MOU, Iran would make certain commitments on its nuclear program — first and foremost to never acquire a nuclear weapon and to resolve the standoff around its enriched uranium. The Axios source claimed the MOU "goes into details on all the nuclear issues" and "satisfies all U.S. requirements."The report said that the deal had been approved on the Iranian side at high levels but likely not by Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. The tentative agreement was reached on Wednesday night after hours of negotiations between Qatari mediator Ali Al-Thawadi and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-will-receive-a-painful-response-tehran-on-trump-s-threat-of-hitting-iran-very-hard-1781192346656">US will receive a 'painful response': Tehran on Trump's threat&nbsp;</a><h2>Iran disagrees with Trump's claims</h2>However, even as Trump claimed that the war is over, Iran pushed back against saying no final decision had yet been taken on any agreement. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said that the proposed understanding was still under review and had not received final approval. "Until Iran announces the matter of a potential understanding, any news from Trump on this subject should be regarded the same as his previous messaging," Baqaei was quoted saying according to Iran's Tasnim news agency said.

A proposed US-Iran agreement reportedly includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz without tolls, phased sanctions relief for Tehran and a 60-day ceasefire extension. President Donald Trump says the deal could be signed soon, though Iran maintains that a final decision has not yet been made.

US President Donald Trump has hinted that the final terms on the deal with Iran has been agreed on by the top Iranian leadership. Even as Iran said that the final agreement has not been made, an Axios report has stated what is inside the new deal. Trump on Thursday (June 11) declared that he has "ended the war with Iran." He made the statement during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones. Trump added that Iran agreed they will never have nuclear weapons. Earlier, Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe. Also Read: 'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes What's in the deal? The US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) states that MOU would extend the ceasefire for 60 days. It states clearly that ceasefire includes in Lebanon. The deal also includes that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened immediately without tolls. Axios quoted one of the official from the mediating countries and said that Iran will receive sanctions relief based on compliance. The text includes a framework for addressing Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, though any action on Iran's nuclear program would depend on a second, more detailed accord. Under the MOU, Iran would make certain commitments on its nuclear program — first and foremost to never acquire a nuclear weapon and to resolve the standoff around its enriched uranium. The Axios source claimed the MOU "goes into details on all the nuclear issues" and "satisfies all U.S. requirements." The report said that the deal had been approved on the Iranian side at high levels but likely not by Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. The tentative agreement was reached on Wednesday night after hours of negotiations between Qatari mediator Ali Al-Thawadi and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Also Read: US will receive a 'painful response': Tehran on Trump's threat Iran disagrees with Trump's claims However, even as Trump claimed that the war is over, Iran pushed back against saying no final decision had yet been taken on any agreement. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said that the proposed understanding was still under review and had not received final approval. "Until Iran announces the matter of a potential understanding, any news from Trump on this subject should be regarded the same as his previous messaging," Baqaei was quoted saying according to Iran's Tasnim news agency said.

A proposed US-Iran agreement reportedly includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz without tolls, phased sanctions relief for Tehran and a 60-day ceasefire extension. President Donald Trump says the deal could be signed soon, though Iran maintains that a final decision has not yet been made.

What's in the latest Iran deal Trump says he's ready to sign with Tehran

Iran’s chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Sunday (May 31) said that Tehran will not agree to any agreement with the US that does not guarantee that the rights of Iranians are secured. In a video statement on state television, Ghalibaf said that Iranian negotiators do not trust the enemy’s words nor its promises. This comes as Tehran and Washington continue to exchange proposals for a framework to end the war in the region.“We will not approve any agreement until we are certain that the rights of the Iranian people have been upheld,” Ghalibaf said. He added Iranian negotiators “neither trust the enemy’s words nor its promises”.Earlier on Saturday (May 30), the New York Times and Axios reported that Trump had sent back the latest framework to be considered by Iran with “tougher” terms. Its details were not immediately clear.Speaking in an interview with Fox News, US President Donald Trump said, “I would rather get a deal, because we can open the Strait immediately upon signing. The one guarantee that I have is that there will be no nuclear weapons.”Iran has reportedly demanded the release of $12 billion in frozen assets before entering substantive negotiations on its nuclear programme, according to Iranian media. Tehran also rejected earlier claims by Trump that its stockpile of enriched uranium would be destroyed, calling the remarks “baseless” and insisting no such agreement had been reached.Iran has also insisted that Lebanon be included in any future agreement, even as fighting continues in the region. This comes amid accusations from Beirut that Israel is pursuing a “scorched-earth policy” through its expanded military operations against the Iran-backed Hezbollah.Meanwhile, Trump has repeatedly suggested that military options remain on the table if talks fail. “I’m in no hurry,” Trump told Fox News, adding, “If we don’t get what we want, we’re going to end in a different way.”Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran’s chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that Tehran will not agree to any deal with the US until Iranian rights are guaranteed, adding that Iranian negotiators do not trust US promises.

Iran’s chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Sunday (May 31) said that Tehran will not agree to any agreement with the US that does not guarantee that the rights of Iranians are secured. In a video statement on state television, Ghalibaf said that Iranian negotiators do not trust the enemy’s words nor its promises. This comes as Tehran and Washington continue to exchange proposals for a framework to end the war in the region. “We will not approve any agreement until we are certain that the rights of the Iranian people have been upheld,” Ghalibaf said. He added Iranian negotiators “neither trust the enemy’s words nor its promises”. Earlier on Saturday (May 30), the New York Times and Axios reported that Trump had sent back the latest framework to be considered by Iran with “tougher” terms. Its details were not immediately clear. Speaking in an interview with Fox News, US President Donald Trump said, “I would rather get a deal, because we can open the Strait immediately upon signing. The one guarantee that I have is that there will be no nuclear weapons.” Iran has reportedly demanded the release of $12 billion in frozen assets before entering substantive negotiations on its nuclear programme, according to Iranian media. Tehran also rejected earlier claims by Trump that its stockpile of enriched uranium would be destroyed, calling the remarks “baseless” and insisting no such agreement had been reached. Iran has also insisted that Lebanon be included in any future agreement, even as fighting continues in the region. This comes amid accusations from Beirut that Israel is pursuing a “scorched-earth policy” through its expanded military operations against the Iran-backed Hezbollah. Meanwhile, Trump has repeatedly suggested that military options remain on the table if talks fail. “I’m in no hurry,” Trump told Fox News, adding, “If we don’t get what we want, we’re going to end in a different way.” Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran’s chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that Tehran will not agree to any deal with the US until Iranian rights are guaranteed, adding that Iranian negotiators do not trust US promises.

‘Don’t trust enemy’: Iran’s top negotiator says no deal with US until rights are secured

US President Donald Trump ended a two-hour-long meeting in the situation room without reaching a final decision. Trump earlier on Friday said in a Truth Social post that he would be making a “final determination” on a potential cease-fire deal with Iran during the meeting. According to a report by the New York Times, which cites a senior administration official, Trump put off his decision as key disputes remain unresolved. The officials said that the matter of unfreezing Iranian assets is being considered, and any deal has to meet Trump's “red lines”."The Situation Room meeting has concluded and lasted approximately two hours. President Trump will only make a deal that is good for America and satisfies his red lines. Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon," said the official to the New York Times. Iran “must agree” to never have a nuclear weapon, and the Strait of Hormuz must be “immediately open” to unrestricted shipping traffic, with no tolls being imposed, Trump earlier demanded in his Friday morning Truth Social Post.&nbsp;US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Dialogue that “any deal would be a good deal”. “If Iran doesn’t want to make a great deal that ensures they don’t get a nuclear weapon,” then Iran can “deal with” the US military, Hegseth said.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pam-bondi-house-oversight-epstein-files-testimony-1780050215949">House Oversight Committee questions Pam Bondi over Epstein document release</a><h2>Iran rejects US ceasefire proposal</h2>Iran Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf expressed scepticism about any deal with the US. In a social media post, he wrote, “We do not trust guarantees and words; only actions are the criterion. No action will be taken before the other side acts.” He said that the Islamic Republic “achieved its rights not through dialogue, but with missiles”. He also warned that “the victor in any agreement is the one who plans better for the war on the day after”. This scepticism from Iran is well-founded, as the United States conducted targeted airstrikes inside Iran just as the 60-day ceasefire extension was being negotiated.&nbsp;

Donald Trump postponed a final decision on a potential Iran ceasefire deal after a two-hour Situation Room meeting. Iran rejected the US proposal, citing distrust and demanding actions over assurances.

US President Donald Trump ended a two-hour-long meeting in the situation room without reaching a final decision. Trump earlier on Friday said in a Truth Social post that he would be making a “final determination” on a potential cease-fire deal with Iran during the meeting. According to a report by the New York Times, which cites a senior administration official, Trump put off his decision as key disputes remain unresolved. The officials said that the matter of unfreezing Iranian assets is being considered, and any deal has to meet Trump's “red lines”. "The Situation Room meeting has concluded and lasted approximately two hours. President Trump will only make a deal that is good for America and satisfies his red lines. Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon," said the official to the New York Times. Iran “must agree” to never have a nuclear weapon, and the Strait of Hormuz must be “immediately open” to unrestricted shipping traffic, with no tolls being imposed, Trump earlier demanded in his Friday morning Truth Social Post. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Dialogue that “any deal would be a good deal”. “If Iran doesn’t want to make a great deal that ensures they don’t get a nuclear weapon,” then Iran can “deal with” the US military, Hegseth said. Also Read: House Oversight Committee questions Pam Bondi over Epstein document release Iran rejects US ceasefire proposal Iran Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf expressed scepticism about any deal with the US. In a social media post, he wrote, “We do not trust guarantees and words; only actions are the criterion. No action will be taken before the other side acts.” He said that the Islamic Republic “achieved its rights not through dialogue, but with missiles”. He also warned that “the victor in any agreement is the one who plans better for the war on the day after”. This scepticism from Iran is well-founded, as the United States conducted targeted airstrikes inside Iran just as the 60-day ceasefire extension was being negotiated.

Donald Trump postponed a final decision on a potential Iran ceasefire deal after a two-hour Situation Room meeting. Iran rejected the US proposal, citing distrust and demanding actions over assurances.

Trump holds off on Iran ceasefire decision, says any deal must satisfy 'red lines'

A day after it was reported that United States and Iran reached a decision to extend the ceasefire and launch negotiations on Iran's nuclear program, but a final approval is awaited from US President Donald Trump on whether a broader agreement will move forward, Trump on Friday (May 29) said he was now making a "final" decision on whether or not to strike a peace deal with Iran.&nbsp;Taking to Truth social Trump wrote that "Iran must agree to not have Nuclear Weapon or Bomb and that the "Hormuz Strait must be immediately open."&nbsp;He then said that "Iran will have to complete the immediate removal and/or detonation of any mines that are left."<h2>What Trump said on Hormuz and nuke weapons</h2>&nbsp;"Iran must agree that they will never have a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb. The Hormuz Strait must be immediately open, no tolls, for unrestricted shipping traffic, in both directions. All water mines (bombs), if any, will be terminated (we have removed, through detonation, numerous such mines with our great underwater mine sweepers. Iran will complete the immediate removal and/or detonation of any mines that are left, which will not be many!)," Trump wrote.&nbsp;Further, he claimed that ships stranded in the Strait of Hormuz due to the naval blockade could now begin "heading home".&nbsp;"Ships caught in the Strait due to our amazing and unprecedented Naval Blockade, which will now be lifted, may start the process of “heading home!” Say HELLO to your wives, husbands, parents, and families from me, your favorite President!," he wrote.&nbsp;He also threatened Iran of "unearthing enriched material" as he said "The enriched material, sometimes referred to as “Nuclear Dust,” which is buried deep underground with virtually collapsed mountains, caused by our powerful B2 Bomber attack 11 months ago, sitting on top of it, will be unearthed by the United States (which, it is agreed, is the only Country, along with China, with the mechanical capability of doing so!), in close coordination and conjunction with the Islamic Republic of Iran, plus the International Atomic Energy Agency, and DESTROYED."&nbsp;The US president ended his social media post by saying, "I will be meeting now, in the Situation Room, to make a final determination."&nbsp;

Taking to Truth social Trump wrote that Iran must agree to not have Nuclear Weapon or Bomb and that the Hormuz Strait must be immediately open."

A day after it was reported that United States and Iran reached a decision to extend the ceasefire and launch negotiations on Iran's nuclear program, but a final approval is awaited from US President Donald Trump on whether a broader agreement will move forward, Trump on Friday (May 29) said he was now making a "final" decision on whether or not to strike a peace deal with Iran. Taking to Truth social Trump wrote that "Iran must agree to not have Nuclear Weapon or Bomb and that the "Hormuz Strait must be immediately open." He then said that "Iran will have to complete the immediate removal and/or detonation of any mines that are left." What Trump said on Hormuz and nuke weapons "Iran must agree that they will never have a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb. The Hormuz Strait must be immediately open, no tolls, for unrestricted shipping traffic, in both directions. All water mines (bombs), if any, will be terminated (we have removed, through detonation, numerous such mines with our great underwater mine sweepers. Iran will complete the immediate removal and/or detonation of any mines that are left, which will not be many!)," Trump wrote. Further, he claimed that ships stranded in the Strait of Hormuz due to the naval blockade could now begin "heading home". "Ships caught in the Strait due to our amazing and unprecedented Naval Blockade, which will now be lifted, may start the process of “heading home!” Say HELLO to your wives, husbands, parents, and families from me, your favorite President!," he wrote. He also threatened Iran of "unearthing enriched material" as he said "The enriched material, sometimes referred to as “Nuclear Dust,” which is buried deep underground with virtually collapsed mountains, caused by our powerful B2 Bomber attack 11 months ago, sitting on top of it, will be unearthed by the United States (which, it is agreed, is the only Country, along with China, with the mechanical capability of doing so!), in close coordination and conjunction with the Islamic Republic of Iran, plus the International Atomic Energy Agency, and DESTROYED." The US president ended his social media post by saying, "I will be meeting now, in the Situation Room, to make a final determination."

Taking to Truth social Trump wrote that "Iran must agree to not have Nuclear Weapon or Bomb and that the "Hormuz Strait must be immediately open."

'Will be meeting now to make a final determination', says Trump on Iran deal

Iranian media on Tuesday (May 26) reported that Tehran’s negotiators were seeking the release of about $24 billion in frozen assets held abroad as part of ongoing efforts to end the war with the United States. This comes as the top Iranian delegation was in Qatar to hold talks over key issues, including the release of funds. Tehran earlier said that it was finalising a 14-point framework for a deal on ending the conflict. Despite the ongoing talks, tensions between the two countries renewed after the US military struck Iranian missile launch sites and boats near the Strait of Hormuz, saying that they acted in “self-defence”. The move drew sharp condemnation from Tehran, which accused the US of ceasefire violation and warned of retaliation.Tasnim news agency reported, citing a source close to the negotiating team, “Iran’s frozen assets are to be released during the course of the negotiations, and this amount is estimated at $24 billion in accordance with the 14-point memorandum of understanding.”It added that around half of that sum “should be made available at the start of the announcement of the memorandum.”The report came as a senior Iranian delegation arrived in Qatar for high-level talks. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, and Central Bank Governor Abdolnaser Hemmati travelled to Doha on Monday (May 25) to discuss key aspects of the negotiations, including the phased release of frozen Iranian funds.According to Tasnim, Ghalibaf’s visit to Qatar was “aimed at reaching an understanding on the implementation of Iran’s demand and the method of accessing $12 billion in the first phase,” among other issues.While there is no official figure for the amount of Tehran’s frozen assets abroad, Iranian media reports have estimated the total between $100 billion and $123 billion.The issue of frozen Iranian funds has remained a major point of friction between Tehran and Washington for years. In 2023, around $6 billion in Iranian assets held in South Korean banks was transferred to Qatar as part of a prisoner exchange deal involving five American citizens detained in Iran. However, the funds were never released after relations sharply deteriorated following Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which triggered the Gaza war and intensified regional tensions.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran is seeking the release of $24 billion in frozen assets as part of talks with the US in Qatar. Meanwhile, tensions rise after recent American strikes near the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranian media on Tuesday (May 26) reported that Tehran’s negotiators were seeking the release of about $24 billion in frozen assets held abroad as part of ongoing efforts to end the war with the United States. This comes as the top Iranian delegation was in Qatar to hold talks over key issues, including the release of funds. Tehran earlier said that it was finalising a 14-point framework for a deal on ending the conflict. Despite the ongoing talks, tensions between the two countries renewed after the US military struck Iranian missile launch sites and boats near the Strait of Hormuz, saying that they acted in “self-defence”. The move drew sharp condemnation from Tehran, which accused the US of ceasefire violation and warned of retaliation. Tasnim news agency reported, citing a source close to the negotiating team, “Iran’s frozen assets are to be released during the course of the negotiations, and this amount is estimated at $24 billion in accordance with the 14-point memorandum of understanding.” It added that around half of that sum “should be made available at the start of the announcement of the memorandum.” The report came as a senior Iranian delegation arrived in Qatar for high-level talks. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, and Central Bank Governor Abdolnaser Hemmati travelled to Doha on Monday (May 25) to discuss key aspects of the negotiations, including the phased release of frozen Iranian funds. According to Tasnim, Ghalibaf’s visit to Qatar was “aimed at reaching an understanding on the implementation of Iran’s demand and the method of accessing $12 billion in the first phase,” among other issues. While there is no official figure for the amount of Tehran’s frozen assets abroad, Iranian media reports have estimated the total between $100 billion and $123 billion. The issue of frozen Iranian funds has remained a major point of friction between Tehran and Washington for years. In 2023, around $6 billion in Iranian assets held in South Korean banks was transferred to Qatar as part of a prisoner exchange deal involving five American citizens detained in Iran. However, the funds were never released after relations sharply deteriorated following Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which triggered the Gaza war and intensified regional tensions. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran is seeking the release of $24 billion in frozen assets as part of talks with the US in Qatar. Meanwhile, tensions rise after recent American strikes near the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran seeking release of $24 billion frozen assets in US deal? What we know

Even as negotiations continue, military activity has not entirely stopped. On Tuesday, the US Central Command confirmed fresh strikes aimed “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces”.

Will Iran war finally end? What we know and don’t know about fragile US-Iran deal still facing key disputes

A major breakthrough amid talks between the US and Iran could be announced within hours. Reportedly, the final draft of a possible US-Iran agreement has been prepared. The proposed agreement calls for an immediate, comprehensive and unconditional ceasefire at all fronts. The draft also reportedly includes a mutual pledge by both sides to refrain from targeting military, civilian or economic infrastructure, alongside a halt to military actions and hostile media campaigns.According to an Al Arabiya report, citing sources, the proposed framework also includes a mutual commitment, stressing respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs. The agreement also mentions guaranteed freedom of navigation in the Gulf waters. The report added that the agreement would take effect immediately after being announced by both Washington and Tehran.The development comes following a visit by Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi to Tehran earlier on Friday. During his trip, he held a second meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. There is also speculation that Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir could visit Iran once both sides are ready to make an official announcement.On Thursday (May 21), US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also expressed optimism regarding the talks between the two sides. “Hopefully that’ll advance this further,” he said.<h2>What are the key terms?</h2>According to the Al Arabiya report, the key terms mentioned in the final draft include:<ul><li>An immediate, comprehensive, unconditional ceasefire on all fronts, including land, sea, air</li><li>A bilateral commitment not to target military, civilian or economic infrastructure</li><li>End to military operations and media war</li><li>Commitments to uphold sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs</li><li>Guarantees freedom of navigation in the Arabian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf of Oman</li><li>Formation of a joint mechanism to oversee implementation and settle disputes</li><li>Talks on outstanding issues to begin within seven days of the agreement taking effect</li><li>Gradual lifting of US sanctions in exchange for Iran adhering to the terms of the deal</li><li>Reaffirmation of compliance with international law and the United Nations Charter</li><li>Immediate enforcement of the agreement following an official announcement by both sides</li></ul><h2>Uncertainty over Iran’s nuclear program</h2>Despite the ongoing talks, uncertainty looms over Iran’s nuclear program. While US President Donald Trump has repeatedly demanded that Iran’s nuclear capabilities must be neutralised, Iran has insisted it has the right to enrich uranium. Earlier on Thursday (May 21), Trump told reporters, “We will get it. We don’t need it, we don’t want it. We’ll probably destroy it after we get it, but we’re not going to let them have it.”Meanwhile, a Reuters report suggested that Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has reportedly issued a directive, demanding that the country’s enriched uranium should not be sent abroad, rejecting demands made by Trump.However, a Bloomberg report, citing a senior Iranian official, rejected the claims that Mojtaba has issued any order requiring enriched uranium to remain inside Iran, calling the reports “enemy propaganda.” The official added that no new directive has been issued and reaffirmed that Tehran will continue to downblend the material.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

A possible US-Iran deal could be announced soon, featuring an immediate ceasefire, sanctions relief and security guarantees, though uncertainty remains over Iran’s nuclear program.

A major breakthrough amid talks between the US and Iran could be announced within hours. Reportedly, the final draft of a possible US-Iran agreement has been prepared. The proposed agreement calls for an immediate, comprehensive and unconditional ceasefire at all fronts. The draft also reportedly includes a mutual pledge by both sides to refrain from targeting military, civilian or economic infrastructure, alongside a halt to military actions and hostile media campaigns. According to an Al Arabiya report, citing sources, the proposed framework also includes a mutual commitment, stressing respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs. The agreement also mentions guaranteed freedom of navigation in the Gulf waters. The report added that the agreement would take effect immediately after being announced by both Washington and Tehran. The development comes following a visit by Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi to Tehran earlier on Friday. During his trip, he held a second meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. There is also speculation that Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir could visit Iran once both sides are ready to make an official announcement. On Thursday (May 21), US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also expressed optimism regarding the talks between the two sides. “Hopefully that’ll advance this further,” he said. What are the key terms? According to the Al Arabiya report, the key terms mentioned in the final draft include: An immediate, comprehensive, unconditional ceasefire on all fronts, including land, sea, air A bilateral commitment not to target military, civilian or economic infrastructure End to military operations and media war Commitments to uphold sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs Guarantees freedom of navigation in the Arabian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf of Oman Formation of a joint mechanism to oversee implementation and settle disputes Talks on outstanding issues to begin within seven days of the agreement taking effect Gradual lifting of US sanctions in exchange for Iran adhering to the terms of the deal Reaffirmation of compliance with international law and the United Nations Charter Immediate enforcement of the agreement following an official announcement by both sides Uncertainty over Iran’s nuclear program Despite the ongoing talks, uncertainty looms over Iran’s nuclear program. While US President Donald Trump has repeatedly demanded that Iran’s nuclear capabilities must be neutralised, Iran has insisted it has the right to enrich uranium. Earlier on Thursday (May 21), Trump told reporters, “We will get it. We don’t need it, we don’t want it. We’ll probably destroy it after we get it, but we’re not going to let them have it.” Meanwhile, a Reuters report suggested that Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has reportedly issued a directive, demanding that the country’s enriched uranium should not be sent abroad, rejecting demands made by Trump. However, a Bloomberg report, citing a senior Iranian official, rejected the claims that Mojtaba has issued any order requiring enriched uranium to remain inside Iran, calling the reports “enemy propaganda.” The official added that no new directive has been issued and reaffirmed that Tehran will continue to downblend the material. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

A possible US-Iran deal could be announced soon, featuring an immediate ceasefire, sanctions relief and security guarantees, though uncertainty remains over Iran’s nuclear program.

US-Iran agreement anytime now? Report reveals what it says are key terms from ‘final draft’

President Donald Trump on Wednesday expressed optimism about striking a deal with Iran, which he said could include Iran exporting its highly enriched uranium to the United States. Trump told PBS News in a phone interview that the US is closing in on a deal and then added, “But I felt that way before with them, so we’ll see what happens.”Trump further said that it is possible a deal could be struck to end the war before his trip to China next week.“I think it’s got a very good chance of ending, and if it doesn’t end, we have to go back to bombing the hell out of them,” Trump told White House correspondent Liz Landers.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/16-killed-several-injured-as-bus-collides-with-fuel-tanker-in-indonesia-s-sumatra-1778076265887">16 killed, several injured as bus collides with fuel tanker in Indonesia’s Sumatra</a><h2>‘It goes to the United States,’ says Trump on Iran’s enriched uranium</h2>&nbsp;&nbsp;“I think we’ll have a very good chance of making a deal again. If we don’t, we’ll go back to our old ways,” he said.When asked to confirm reports that Iran would export its highly enriched uranium, perhaps, to the US, Trump said, “No, not perhaps. It goes to the United States.”&nbsp;“It’s getting very close. If they agree, it’s over, and if they don’t agree, we bomb,” he added.&nbsp;When asked about gas prices and whether they will drop, Trump said they would go way down.“Well, we have 1,000 boats that are loaded up with oil that can’t, you know, go anywhere. So, when that—it's gonna be a, it’s gonna be an oil rush,” he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-verify-think-before-sharing-says-giorgia-meloni-after-her-ai-made-image-in-lingerie-goes-viral-1778010741625">‘Verify, think before sharing,’ says Giorgia Meloni after her AI-made image in lingerie goes viral</a>&nbsp;Earlier, Trump had posted on Truth Social that Project Freedom, a mission to escort commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz, would be ‘paused’ as the countries got closer to a deal.&nbsp;<h2>Trump defends his White House ballroom project</h2>&nbsp;The president also defended his White House ballroom project, which faced renewed scrutiny this week after Senate Republicans proposed including $1 billion for security upgrades to the East Wing in a reconciliation bill. Trump has touted the project as funded by himself and other private donors. The estimated price tag of $200 million has nearly doubled in recent months."It's a tiny, it's one one-millionth of a percent of what we do. That's a small deal. And I'm putting up a lot of money myself," he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-iran-beaten-badly-its-navy-reduced-to-little-boats-with-machine-guns-says-trump-1778004098730">‘Iran beaten badly, its navy reduced to little boats with machine guns,’ says Trump</a><h2>‘It will have a drone-proof roof’</h2>&nbsp;“We want to have the inaugurations in the ballroom. This is big enough to handle the inauguration. And it’s got bulletproof glass.”&nbsp;“So we want safety, we want security, and that’s what we have with the ballroom. And as an example, we have a drone-proof roof. Nice thing in these modern days, you know. So it’s gonna be great. A president can walk right from the White House into the ballroom. There’s no going on the streets," the president added.&nbsp;

President Trump also defended his White House ballroom project, which faced renewed scrutiny this week after Senate Republicans proposed including $1 billion for security upgrades to the East Wing in a reconciliation bill.

President Donald Trump on Wednesday expressed optimism about striking a deal with Iran, which he said could include Iran exporting its highly enriched uranium to the United States. Trump told PBS News in a phone interview that the US is closing in on a deal and then added, “But I felt that way before with them, so we’ll see what happens.” Trump further said that it is possible a deal could be struck to end the war before his trip to China next week. “I think it’s got a very good chance of ending, and if it doesn’t end, we have to go back to bombing the hell out of them,” Trump told White House correspondent Liz Landers. Also Read: 16 killed, several injured as bus collides with fuel tanker in Indonesia’s Sumatra ‘It goes to the United States,’ says Trump on Iran’s enriched uranium “I think we’ll have a very good chance of making a deal again. If we don’t, we’ll go back to our old ways,” he said. When asked to confirm reports that Iran would export its highly enriched uranium, perhaps, to the US, Trump said, “No, not perhaps. It goes to the United States.” “It’s getting very close. If they agree, it’s over, and if they don’t agree, we bomb,” he added. When asked about gas prices and whether they will drop, Trump said they would go way down. “Well, we have 1,000 boats that are loaded up with oil that can’t, you know, go anywhere. So, when that—it's gonna be a, it’s gonna be an oil rush,” he said. Also Read: ‘Verify, think before sharing,’ says Giorgia Meloni after her AI-made image in lingerie goes viral Earlier, Trump had posted on Truth Social that Project Freedom, a mission to escort commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz, would be ‘paused’ as the countries got closer to a deal. Trump defends his White House ballroom project The president also defended his White House ballroom project, which faced renewed scrutiny this week after Senate Republicans proposed including $1 billion for security upgrades to the East Wing in a reconciliation bill. Trump has touted the project as funded by himself and other private donors. The estimated price tag of $200 million has nearly doubled in recent months. "It's a tiny, it's one one-millionth of a percent of what we do. That's a small deal. And I'm putting up a lot of money myself," he said. Also Read: ‘Iran beaten badly, its navy reduced to little boats with machine guns,’ says Trump ‘It will have a drone-proof roof’ “We want to have the inaugurations in the ballroom. This is big enough to handle the inauguration. And it’s got bulletproof glass.” “So we want safety, we want security, and that’s what we have with the ballroom. And as an example, we have a drone-proof roof. Nice thing in these modern days, you know. So it’s gonna be great. A president can walk right from the White House into the ballroom. There’s no going on the streets," the president added.

President Trump also defended his White House ballroom project, which faced renewed scrutiny this week after Senate Republicans proposed including $1 billion for security upgrades to the East Wing in a reconciliation bill.

‘Very good chance of ending war, Iran to export its highly enriched uranium to US,’ says Trump

The White House reportedly believes that it is getting close to reaching an agreement with Iran, with the United States expecting Iranian responses on several key issues in the next 48 hours. While no agreement has been reached between the two nations since the fragile ceasefire came into effect on April 8, a US media report has suggested that this was the closest both parties had been to an agreement since the war began on February 28. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump once again threatened Iran to reach a deal, warning of “intense” bombing.According to an Axios report, citing US officials and other sources, the US believes it is getting closer to an agreement with Iran on a one-page, 14-point memorandum of understanding (MOU) to end the war and set a framework for detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear program.<h2>What’s in the one-page memo?</h2>The deal includes Iran committing to a moratorium on nuclear enrichment, the US agreeing to lift sanctions on Tehran and releasing billions of frozen Iranian funds. It also includes both sides lifting restrictions on the transit of ships through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.Many of the terms outlined in the memo depend on a final agreement being reached, leaving open the possibility of renewed conflict or a prolonged stalemate where active fighting has ceased but no lasting resolution has been achieved.In its current form, the MOU would mark the end of the conflict and begin a 30-day window for negotiations on a comprehensive deal, including reopening the strait, curbing Iran’s nuclear activities, and easing US sanctions. The talks could be held in Islamabad or Geneva, the report added, citing sources.On Wednesday (May 6), Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who has positioned himself as a key mediator in the negotiations between Iran and the United States, said that he was “hopeful” that the current momentum of talks would lead to peace in West Asia.<h2>Trump warns of ‘intense’ bombing</h2>Meanwhile, Trump threatened “intense” bombing if Iran refuses to open the Strait of Hormuz. In a post on his Truth Social platform, the US president warned that if Tehran does not allow Hormuz to be open to all, “bombing” will start at a “much higher level” and more intense than it was before.“Assuming Iran agrees to give what has been agreed to, which is, perhaps, a big assumption, the already legendary Epic Fury will be at an end, and the highly effective Blockade will allow the Hormuz Strait to be OPEN TO ALL, including Iran,” he wrote.He added, “If they don’t agree, the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before.”<h2>Trump pauses ‘Project Freedom’</h2>Earlier on Tuesday, Trump announced that he is pausing the US military operation ‘Project Freedom’, aimed at directing stranded commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, suggesting a possibility of sealing a deal to end the war. However, he maintained that the US blockade of Iranian ports will remain in place as Tehran kept its own closure of the world’s most strategic trade route.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

The United States reportedly believes it is closer to reaching a deal with Iran to end the conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as US President Donald Trump warns of intensified bombing if talks fail.

The White House reportedly believes that it is getting close to reaching an agreement with Iran, with the United States expecting Iranian responses on several key issues in the next 48 hours. While no agreement has been reached between the two nations since the fragile ceasefire came into effect on April 8, a US media report has suggested that this was the closest both parties had been to an agreement since the war began on February 28. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump once again threatened Iran to reach a deal, warning of “intense” bombing. According to an Axios report, citing US officials and other sources, the US believes it is getting closer to an agreement with Iran on a one-page, 14-point memorandum of understanding (MOU) to end the war and set a framework for detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear program. What’s in the one-page memo? The deal includes Iran committing to a moratorium on nuclear enrichment, the US agreeing to lift sanctions on Tehran and releasing billions of frozen Iranian funds. It also includes both sides lifting restrictions on the transit of ships through the strategic Strait of Hormuz. Many of the terms outlined in the memo depend on a final agreement being reached, leaving open the possibility of renewed conflict or a prolonged stalemate where active fighting has ceased but no lasting resolution has been achieved. In its current form, the MOU would mark the end of the conflict and begin a 30-day window for negotiations on a comprehensive deal, including reopening the strait, curbing Iran’s nuclear activities, and easing US sanctions. The talks could be held in Islamabad or Geneva, the report added, citing sources. On Wednesday (May 6), Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who has positioned himself as a key mediator in the negotiations between Iran and the United States, said that he was “hopeful” that the current momentum of talks would lead to peace in West Asia. Trump warns of ‘intense’ bombing Meanwhile, Trump threatened “intense” bombing if Iran refuses to open the Strait of Hormuz. In a post on his Truth Social platform, the US president warned that if Tehran does not allow Hormuz to be open to all, “bombing” will start at a “much higher level” and more intense than it was before. “Assuming Iran agrees to give what has been agreed to, which is, perhaps, a big assumption, the already legendary Epic Fury will be at an end, and the highly effective Blockade will allow the Hormuz Strait to be OPEN TO ALL, including Iran,” he wrote. He added, “If they don’t agree, the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before.” Trump pauses ‘Project Freedom’ Earlier on Tuesday, Trump announced that he is pausing the US military operation ‘Project Freedom’, aimed at directing stranded commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, suggesting a possibility of sealing a deal to end the war. However, he maintained that the US blockade of Iranian ports will remain in place as Tehran kept its own closure of the world’s most strategic trade route. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

The United States reportedly believes it is closer to reaching a deal with Iran to end the conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as US President Donald Trump warns of intensified bombing if talks fail.

US, Iran close to reaching a deal? Inside one-page memo to end war

Iran’s Mach 15 Fattah hypersonic missiles pose a severe threat to the USS George H.W. Bush. While these weapons could potentially sink a supercarrier if it comes within range, massive US airstrikes have reportedly destroyed most of Iran’s missile launch facilities.


Can Iran’s hypersonic missile sink the USS George H.W. Bush?

US President Donald Trump refuted media speculations that the US is desperate to cut a deal with Iran to prevent rising costs and claimed that he is “possibly the least pressured person ever to be in this position.”“I have all the time in the World, but Iran doesn’t — The clock is ticking,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.&nbsp;“Iran’s Navy is lying at the bottom of the Sea, their Air Force is demolished, their Anti Aircraft and Radar Weaponry is gone, their leaders are no longer with us, the Blockade is airtight and strong and, from there, it only gets worse — Time is not on their side!” Trump wrote in his post.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-talks-with-iran-appeasement-says-reza-pahlavi-appeals-western-countries-to-join-war-against-iran-1776970307677">‘Talks with Iran appeasement,’ says Reza Pahlavi, appeals Western countries to join war against Iran</a>&nbsp;The US president further said in his Truth Social post that a deal with Iran will only be made when it is “appropriate and good” for the United States.“A deal will only be made when it’s appropriate and good for the United States of America, our allies and, in fact, the rest of the World,” he added, while dispelling notions of being under any kind of pressure and being “anxious” to end the war.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-intercepts-iranian-oil-tankers-in-asian-waters-away-from-strait-of-hormuz-sources-1776962536156">US intercepts Iranian oil tankers in Asian waters, away from Strait of Hormuz: Sources</a><h2>‘Third aircraft carrier has arrived in the Middle East’: US military</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, the US military announced that a third aircraft carrier has arrived in the Middle East, amid the fragile truce with Iran.In a post on X, the US Central Command published a photo showing USS George H.W. Bush sailing in the Indian Ocean, in the CENTCOM “area of responsibility.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-it-showed-govt-s-total-faith-in-armed-forces-gen-naravane-on-jo-uchit-samjho-woh-karo-remark-in-memoir-1776952372213">‘It showed govt’s ‘total faith’ in armed forces’: Gen Naravane on ‘jo uchit samjho woh karo’ remark in memoir</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) sails in the Indian Ocean in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, April 23. <a href="https://t.co/oDcTM6YMLF">pic.twitter.com/oDcTM6YMLF</a>&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2047375382135947468?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;&nbsp;The aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush has now arrived in U.S. Central Command, making the ship the third aircraft carrier to be present in the Middle East amid a shaky ceasefire in the Iran war.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-that-s-where-mea-shrugs-off-trump-s-hellhole-comment-on-india-and-china-1776947554143">‘That’s where…’: MEA shrugs off Trump’s ‘hellhole’ comment on India and China</a>&nbsp;The Bush is now in the Indian Ocean, according to a social media post from the military command. The USS Abraham Lincoln is located in the Arabian Sea and the USS Gerald R. Ford is in the Red Sea.USS George H.W. Bush, which left its home port of Norfolk at the end of March, proceeded to sail across the Atlantic Ocean but then made the unusual choice to turn south and sail around the Horn of Africa before heading north toward the waters of the Middle East.

US President Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social that a deal with Iran will only be made when it is appropriate and good for the United States. He added that a deal will only be made when it’s appropriate and good for the US and the rest of the world.

US President Donald Trump refuted media speculations that the US is desperate to cut a deal with Iran to prevent rising costs and claimed that he is “possibly the least pressured person ever to be in this position.” “I have all the time in the World, but Iran doesn’t — The clock is ticking,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Iran’s Navy is lying at the bottom of the Sea, their Air Force is demolished, their Anti Aircraft and Radar Weaponry is gone, their leaders are no longer with us, the Blockade is airtight and strong and, from there, it only gets worse — Time is not on their side!” Trump wrote in his post. Also Read: ‘Talks with Iran appeasement,’ says Reza Pahlavi, appeals Western countries to join war against Iran The US president further said in his Truth Social post that a deal with Iran will only be made when it is “appropriate and good” for the United States. “A deal will only be made when it’s appropriate and good for the United States of America, our allies and, in fact, the rest of the World,” he added, while dispelling notions of being under any kind of pressure and being “anxious” to end the war. Also Read: US intercepts Iranian oil tankers in Asian waters, away from Strait of Hormuz: Sources ‘Third aircraft carrier has arrived in the Middle East’: US military Meanwhile, the US military announced that a third aircraft carrier has arrived in the Middle East, amid the fragile truce with Iran. In a post on X, the US Central Command published a photo showing USS George H.W. Bush sailing in the Indian Ocean, in the CENTCOM “area of responsibility.” Also Read: ‘It showed govt’s ‘total faith’ in armed forces’: Gen Naravane on ‘jo uchit samjho woh karo’ remark in memoir

US President Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social that a deal with Iran will only be made when it is appropriate and good for the United States. He added that a deal will only be made when it’s appropriate and good for the US and the rest of the world.

‘Clock is ticking for Iran,’ says Trump as third US aircraft carrier arrives in Middle East

Iran said on Wednesday it was open "to any initiative" as Western powers stepped up efforts to save a 2015 deal to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions -- on life support since a 2018 decision by the US to withdraw its backing and reimpose sanctions.

After talks with the remaining parties to the deal in Vienna, Iranian negotiator Abbas Araghchi said he was "fully prepared" to reverse measures that apparently violated Tehran's commitments -- but only if the other side reciprocated.

Britain, France and Germany launched the deal's formal dispute process in January after Iran said it would no longer observe limits on the number of centrifuges used to enrich uranium -- one of the deal's key stipulations.

The dispute process spells out several steps, the last one of which is notifying the UN Security Council. UN sanctions would then automatically "snap back" after 30 days unless the Security Council voted to stop it.

Iran argued on Wednesday that it needed some benefits under the deal, which promises it sanctions relief in return for curbing its nuclear programme.

Renewed US measures have crippled the Iranian economy and were cited as the reason for Iran restarting various nuclear processes since May last year.

The European Union -- which oversaw the Vienna talks between Iran, the three western European nations, Russia and China -- said "serious concerns" had been expressed over compliance.

But the EU statement added: "Participants also acknowledged that the re-imposition of US sanctions did not allow Iran to reap the full benefits arising from sanctions-lifting."

'Far from a result'

A diplomat who asked not to be named told AFP on Tuesday that no timetable had been fixed for solving the dispute, adding "we are still far from a result".

The diplomat said everyone wanted to save the deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), so that UN inspectors could continue working in Iran.

The Internation Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been tasked with monitoring the deal's implementation and its latest report is expected within days.

"We are still open to any initiative which can ensure Iran's dividends of the JCPOA," said Araghchi, the Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister, after the Vienna talks.

"We are fully prepared to reverse steps we have taken so far in return for the fulfilment of the other side's commitments under the JCPOA."

Western diplomats believe Iran is unlikely to heed calls to come back into full compliance without substantial concessions -- such as an end to US sanctions or Europe taking measures to offset their economic impact.

But they hope the use of the dispute process will convince Iran not to make any more moves away from the deal, giving space for back-channel diplomacy aimed at bringing Washington and Tehran back into alignment.

The diplomat told AFP that Iran could also "at least freeze its uranium stocks" as a possible positive outcome of the current discussions.

At a major international security conference in Munich earlier this month, Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Tehran would be prepared to move back towards the deal if Europe provides "meaningful" economic benefits.

Europe has set up a special trading mechanism called Instex to try to enable legitimate humanitarian trade with Iran, but it has yet to complete any transactions and Tehran regards it as inadequate.

The renewed US sanctions have almost entirely isolated Iran from the international financial system, driven away oil buyers and plunged the country into a severe recession.

Iran said on Wednesday it was open "to any initiative" as Western powers stepped up efforts to save a 2015 deal to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions -- on life support since a 2018 decision by the US to withdraw its backing and reimpose sanctions.

Iran said on Wednesday it was open "to any initiative" as Western powers stepped up efforts to save a 2015 deal to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions -- on life support since a 2018 decision by the US to withdraw its backing and reimpose sanctions. After talks with the remaining parties to the deal in Vienna, Iranian negotiator Abbas Araghchi said he was "fully prepared" to reverse measures that apparently violated Tehran's commitments -- but only if the other side reciprocated. Britain, France and Germany launched the deal's formal dispute process in January after Iran said it would no longer observe limits on the number of centrifuges used to enrich uranium -- one of the deal's key stipulations. The dispute process spells out several steps, the last one of which is notifying the UN Security Council. UN sanctions would then automatically "snap back" after 30 days unless the Security Council voted to stop it. Iran argued on Wednesday that it needed some benefits under the deal, which promises it sanctions relief in return for curbing its nuclear programme. Renewed US measures have crippled the Iranian economy and were cited as the reason for Iran restarting various nuclear processes since May last year. The European Union -- which oversaw the Vienna talks between Iran, the three western European nations, Russia and China -- said "serious concerns" had been expressed over compliance. But the EU statement added: "Participants also acknowledged that the re-imposition of US sanctions did not allow Iran to reap the full benefits arising from sanctions-lifting." 'Far from a result' A diplomat who asked not to be named told AFP on Tuesday that no timetable had been fixed for solving the dispute, adding "we are still far from a result". The diplomat said everyone wanted to save the deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), so that UN inspectors could continue working in Iran. The Internation Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been tasked with monitoring the deal's implementation and its latest report is expected within days. "We are still open to any initiative which can ensure Iran's dividends of the JCPOA," said Araghchi, the Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister, after the Vienna talks. "We are fully prepared to reverse steps we have taken so far in return for the fulfilment of the other side's commitments under the JCPOA." Western diplomats believe Iran is unlikely to heed calls to come back into full compliance without substantial concessions -- such as an end to US sanctions or Europe taking measures to offset their economic impact. But they hope the use of the dispute process will convince Iran not to make any more moves away from the deal, giving space for back-channel diplomacy aimed at bringing Washington and Tehran back into alignment. The diplomat told AFP that Iran could also "at least freeze its uranium stocks" as a possible positive outcome of the current discussions. At a major international security conference in Munich earlier this month, Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Tehran would be prepared to move back towards the deal if Europe provides "meaningful" economic benefits. Europe has set up a special trading mechanism called Instex to try to enable legitimate humanitarian trade with Iran, but it has yet to complete any transactions and Tehran regards it as inadequate. The renewed US sanctions have almost entirely isolated Iran from the international financial system, driven away oil buyers and plunged the country into a severe recession.

Iran open to 'any initiative' after talks to save nuclear deal

An Iran hawk who advocated killing General Qasem Soleimani, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has ordered his diplomats to limit contacts with militant Iranian exile and opposition groups that support either regime change or greater rights for ethnic groups like Kurds and Arabs.

Coming on the back of the Soleimani killing, Pompeo’s directive appears to put an end to the Trump administration’s hinting that it covertly supports insurgent efforts to at the very least destabilise the Iranian government if not topple it.

A litmus test of the directive by Pompeo, known to have a close relationship with Donald J Trump, is likely to be whether the president’s personal lawyer, Rudolph Giuliani, distances himself from the controversial National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), an offshoot of the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, a group that was taken off the US Treasury’s list of designated terrorists several years ago.

Giuliani is a frequent, well-paid speaker at gatherings of the group that has built a significant network among Western political elites. The council and the Mujahedeen openly call for regime change in Iran.

The Mujahedeen were moved with US assistance from their exile base in Iraq to a reportedly Saudi-funded secretive facility in Albania.

A New Jersey-based lobbying firm hired by the NCRI, Rosemont Associates, reported last year in its filing as a foreign agent frequent email and telephone contact on behalf of its client with the US embassy in the Albanian capital of Tirana as well as Brian Hook, the US Special Representative for Iran, and Gabriel Noronha, an aide to Hook.

In his directive, Pompeo said that “Direct US government engagement with these groups could prove counterproductive to our policy goal of seeking a comprehensive deal with the Iranian regime that addresses its destabilising behaviour.”&nbsp;

The secretary went on to say that Iranian opposition groups “Try to engage US officials regularly to gain at least the appearance of tacit support and enhance their visibility and clout.”

Pompeo’s cable, while keeping a potential negotiated deal with Iran on the table, does not stop other US government agencies from covertly supporting the various groups, that also includes Arab Struggle Movement for the Liberation of al-Ahwaz (AMLA), the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, and the Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran (KDPI).

Iran, which has long believed that the United States, alongside Saudi Arabia and Israel, supported the Mujahedeen as well as ethnic militants that intermittently launch attacks inside Iran, is likely to take a wait-and see-attitude towards Pompeo’s directive that could be seen as a signal that the Trump administration is not seeking regime change.

The timing of the directive is significant. Iran responded to the killing of Soleimani with carefully calibrated missile attacks on US facilities in Iraq in a bid to create an environment in which backchanneling potentially could steer the United States and Iran back to the negotiating table.

While it was uncertain that one round of escalated tensions would do the trick, potential efforts were not helped by the death of Oman’s Sultan Qaboos bin Said al Said, a key interlocutor who has repeatedly helped resolve US-Iranian problems and initiated contacts that ultimately led to the 2015 international agreement that curbed Iran’s nuclear program.

In his directive, Pompeo, referring to Komala, acknowledged that “Iran’s regime appears to assess that the United States and/or Israel support this group of militant Kurds.”

Iranian perceptions were reinforced not only by calls for regime change by senior figures like Giuliani and Saudi prince Turki al-Faisal, a former head of the kingdom’s intelligence service and ex-ambassador to Britain and the United States, but also the appointment in 2018 of Steven Fagin as counsel general in Erbil in Iraqi Kurdistan.

Shortly before moving to Erbil, Fagin met in Washington as head of the State Department’s Office of Iranian Affairs, with Mustafa Hijri, leader of the KDPI as it stepped up its attacks in Iranian Kurdistan.

Iranian perceptions were further informed by the appointment of John Bolton, Trump’s since departed national security advisor and like Giuliani a frequent speaker at NCRI events, who publicly advocates support of ethnic insurgencies in Iran in a bid to change the regime.

As Trump’s first director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Pompeo named Michael D’Andrea, a hard-charging, chain-smoking covert operations officer, alternatively nicknamed the Dark Prince or Ayatollah Mike, whose track record includes overseeing the hunt for Osama Bin Laden, as head of the CIA’s Iran operations.

The appointment was followed by the publication by a Riyadh-based think tank believed to be close to crown prince Mohammed bin Salman of a study for Saudi support for a low-level Baloch insurgency in Iran. Prince Mohammed vowed around the same time that “We will work so that the battle is for them in Iran, not in Saudi Arabia.”

Pakistani militants have claimed that Saudi Arabia had stepped up funding of militant madrassas or religious seminaries in the Pakistani province of Balochistan that allegedly serves as havens for anti-Iranian fighters.

The New York Times reported this week that aides to Prince Mohammed had in the past discussed with private businessmen the assassination of Soleimani, an architect of Iran’s regional network of proxies, and other Iranians as well as ways of sabotaging the country’s economy.

Pompeo’s directive is unlikely to persuade Iran that Washington has had a change of heart. Indeed, it hasn’t. Trump maintains his campaign of maximum pressure and this week imposed additional sanctions on Iran.

Nonetheless, potentially taking regime change off the table facilitates backchanneling that aims at getting the two nations to talk again. 
 
(Views expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL) 
&nbsp;

An Iran hawk who advocated killing General Qasem Soleimani, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has ordered his diplomats to limit contacts with militant Iranian exile and opposition groups that support either regime change or greater rights for ethnic groups like Kurds and Arabs.

An Iran hawk who advocated killing General Qasem Soleimani, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has ordered his diplomats to limit contacts with militant Iranian exile and opposition groups that support either regime change or greater rights for ethnic groups like Kurds and Arabs. Coming on the back of the Soleimani killing, Pompeo’s directive appears to put an end to the Trump administration’s hinting that it covertly supports insurgent efforts to at the very least destabilise the Iranian government if not topple it. A litmus test of the directive by Pompeo, known to have a close relationship with Donald J Trump, is likely to be whether the president’s personal lawyer, Rudolph Giuliani, distances himself from the controversial National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), an offshoot of the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, a group that was taken off the US Treasury’s list of designated terrorists several years ago. Giuliani is a frequent, well-paid speaker at gatherings of the group that has built a significant network among Western political elites. The council and the Mujahedeen openly call for regime change in Iran. The Mujahedeen were moved with US assistance from their exile base in Iraq to a reportedly Saudi-funded secretive facility in Albania. A New Jersey-based lobbying firm hired by the NCRI, Rosemont Associates, reported last year in its filing as a foreign agent frequent email and telephone contact on behalf of its client with the US embassy in the Albanian capital of Tirana as well as Brian Hook, the US Special Representative for Iran, and Gabriel Noronha, an aide to Hook. In his directive, Pompeo said that “Direct US government engagement with these groups could prove counterproductive to our policy goal of seeking a comprehensive deal with the Iranian regime that addresses its destabilising behaviour.” The secretary went on to say that Iranian opposition groups “Try to engage US officials regularly to gain at least the appearance of tacit support and enhance their visibility and clout.” Pompeo’s cable, while keeping a potential negotiated deal with Iran on the table, does not stop other US government agencies from covertly supporting the various groups, that also includes Arab Struggle Movement for the Liberation of al-Ahwaz (AMLA), the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, and the Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran (KDPI). Iran, which has long believed that the United States, alongside Saudi Arabia and Israel, supported the Mujahedeen as well as ethnic militants that intermittently launch attacks inside Iran, is likely to take a wait-and see-attitude towards Pompeo’s directive that could be seen as a signal that the Trump administration is not seeking regime change. The timing of the directive is significant. Iran responded to the killing of Soleimani with carefully calibrated missile attacks on US facilities in Iraq in a bid to create an environment in which backchanneling potentially could steer the United States and Iran back to the negotiating table. While it was uncertain that one round of escalated tensions would do the trick, potential efforts were not helped by the death of Oman’s Sultan Qaboos bin Said al Said, a key interlocutor who has repeatedly helped resolve US-Iranian problems and initiated contacts that ultimately led to the 2015 international agreement that curbed Iran’s nuclear program. In his directive, Pompeo, referring to Komala, acknowledged that “Iran’s regime appears to assess that the United States and/or Israel support this group of militant Kurds.” Iranian perceptions were reinforced not only by calls for regime change by senior figures like Giuliani and Saudi prince Turki al-Faisal, a former head of the kingdom’s intelligence service and ex-ambassador to Britain and the United States, but also the appointment in 2018 of Steven Fagin as counsel general in Erbil in Iraqi Kurdistan. Shortly before moving to Erbil, Fagin met in Washington as head of the State Department’s Office of Iranian Affairs, with Mustafa Hijri, leader of the KDPI as it stepped up its attacks in Iranian Kurdistan. Iranian perceptions were further informed by the appointment of John Bolton, Trump’s since departed national security advisor and like Giuliani a frequent speaker at NCRI events, who publicly advocates support of ethnic insurgencies in Iran in a bid to change the regime. As Trump’s first director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Pompeo named Michael D’Andrea, a hard-charging, chain-smoking covert operations officer, alternatively nicknamed the Dark Prince or Ayatollah Mike, whose track record includes overseeing the hunt for Osama Bin Laden, as head of the CIA’s Iran operations. The appointment was followed by the publication by a Riyadh-based think tank believed to be close to crown prince Mohammed bin Salman of a study for Saudi support for a low-level Baloch insurgency in Iran. Prince Mohammed vowed around the same time that “We will work so that the battle is for them in Iran, not in Saudi Arabia.” Pakistani militants have claimed that Saudi Arabia had stepped up funding of militant madrassas or religious seminaries in the Pakistani province of Balochistan that allegedly serves as havens for anti-Iranian fighters. The New York Times reported this week that aides to Prince Mohammed had in the past discussed with private businessmen the assassination of Soleimani, an architect of Iran’s regional network of proxies, and other Iranians as well as ways of sabotaging the country’s economy. Pompeo’s directive is unlikely to persuade Iran that Washington has had a change of heart. Indeed, it hasn’t. Trump maintains his campaign of maximum pressure and this week imposed additional sanctions on Iran. Nonetheless, potentially taking regime change off the table facilitates backchanneling that aims at getting the two nations to talk again. (Views expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL)

US backs off support to regime change in Iran

By Tony Walker

The last thing the world needs at a moment of significant trade tensions between the United States and China is a Middle East crisis that would further imperil global growth.

Yet this is what is threatening in the Persian Gulf, where the US and its Arab allies are edging towards a showdown with Iran in a contested waterway through which 20 per cent&nbsp;of the world’s tradeable oil passes daily.

In coordination with its Arab allies, notably Saudi Arabia, and with Israel, the US is ratcheting up pressure on Iran to wind back its support for what it terms “bad actors” in the region.

This includes Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, radical groups in the Palestinian territories, including Hamas, the Houthis in Yemen, and disaffected anti-regime elements in the Gulf.

While the US denies it is seeking to bring about regime change in Iran, this clearly is its hope.

Conflict is not inevitable, but risks are elevated by combative talk – and actions – from a Washington that seems bent on engaging in the sort of brinkmanship that threatens more serious conflict in a region already on edge.

Washington’s deployment of an aircraft carrier battle group and B-52 bombers in the Gulf region is amplifying concerns.

President Donald Trump is not helping; to the contrary.

On one hand, he invites Iran’s leaders to talk. On the other, he warns of that country’s annihilation.

This sort of bombast, the antithesis of wielding a big stick and talking softly, coincides with tightening US sanctions that are doing significant damage to Iran’s economy.

These measures include sanctions imposed this month on Iran’s industrial metals sector. This sector accounts for about 10 per cent&nbsp;of its export economy.

How Tehran responds to these harsh assaults on its economic lifelines is anyone’s guess, but what is certain is that its response will not be passive.

Already this month we have witnessed two sets of terrorist attacks on Gulf oil interests Iran, or its proxies, are blamed for an assault on four ships in which explosives damaged the hulls. Two of these vessels are Saudi-owned. In the second, Iran proxies are blamed for drone strikes on a Saudi Arabian oil pipeline.

In response to terrorist threats to its eastern oil-rich provinces, Saudi Arabia’s state-controlled media have begun calling for “surgical strikes” against Iranian interests.

Such action would provoke a wider conflagration.

What tends to be overlooked in all of this is the ease with which Iran, on a previous occasion, stifled oil shipments from the Gulf.

In 1984, Iran was widely believed to have been responsible for rolling second world war mines into Gulf waterways in the so-called “tanker war” with Iraq. This destroyed several vessels and brought tanker traffic to a halt for weeks.

Adding to jitters are recent reports that a Katyusha rocket fell near the American embassy in central Baghdad. Iranian-backed militias, with their strongholds across the Tigris River in the east of the city, are suspected of launching the rocket.

Washington had already ordered non-essential US personnel out of Baghdad. Oil giant ExxonMobil has begun moving employees out of the region. The US has warned commercial air traffic of increased risks in the Gulf.

This is a movie we have seen before, in the first Gulf War and in the 2003 invasion of Iraq to remove Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

Iran proved to be a significant beneficiary of the chaos that resulted from a destabilisation of the Middle East following the US-led invasion.

None of this is contributing to a stable oil market, on which the global economy rests.

On top of punitive sanctions against Iran, sanctions on Venezuela and disruptions in Libya caused by a civil war have unsettled markets.

Dramatic cuts in Iran’s oil shipments due to US-imposed sanctions followed Washington’s withdrawal last year from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) aimed at forestalling Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Until sanctions started to bite, Iran was the second-largest exporter among Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), behind Saudi Arabia. At their peak, Iranian exports were about 3 million barrels a day.

That number has now slid to 500,000 barrels or less, according to oil market analysts. But in its attempts to skirt US sanctions, Iran is no longer reporting production to OPEC and is not providing definitive information on exports.

As things stand, US sanctions are being adhered to by most importers of Iranian crude, with the likely exceptions being China and India. The US removed waivers on countries accepting Iran’s oil in November after withdrawing from the JCPOA in May 2018.

The 2015 agreement, negotiated by the Obama administration in partnership with the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany, froze Iran’s nuclear program for 15 years. The agreement was designed to provide an opportunity for the West to take counter-measures in case Iran upscaled its production of fissionable material.

By withdrawing from the JCPOA without a fallback position beyond punitive sanctions and threats of military action, the US has separated itself from its allies and left itself few options beyond further sanctions – or military threats.

That is, unless Trump’s offers of direct negotiations with Iran’s leaders bear fruit. At this stage, a tense standoff in the world’s most volatile region is not only dangerous, it could have been avoided by the US adhering to an agreement that was far from perfect, but better than the alternative.

That alternative is estrangement from its allies on Iran, and now real risks of a further security deterioration in the volatile Gulf.

Philip Gordon, a Middle East specialist at the Council on Foreign Relations, summed up the dilemma for US policy and that of its allies rendered anxious by risks of adventurism in the Gulf in pursuit of an American goal of regime change in Tehran. He wrote that barring something extraordinary such as the collapse of the Iranian regime, "It’s hard to see how this current conflict could end without the United States backing down or with a further and very dangerous escalation. The Trump administration should have considered all this before it walked away from the nuclear deal in the first place."

(Tony Walker is Adjunct Professor, School of Communications, La Trobe University)

&nbsp;(This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/trouble-in-the-gulf-as-us-iran-dispute-threatens-to-escalate-into-serious-conflict-117081">original article</a>)

(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL.)&nbsp; 
&nbsp;

&nbsp;

By Tony Walker The last thing the world needs at a moment of significant trade tensions between the United States and China is a Middle East crisis that would further imperil global growth.

By Tony Walker The last thing the world needs at a moment of significant trade tensions between the United States and China is a Middle East crisis that would further imperil global growth. Yet this is what is threatening in the Persian Gulf, where the US and its Arab allies are edging towards a showdown with Iran in a contested waterway through which 20 per cent of the world’s tradeable oil passes daily. In coordination with its Arab allies, notably Saudi Arabia, and with Israel, the US is ratcheting up pressure on Iran to wind back its support for what it terms “bad actors” in the region. This includes Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, radical groups in the Palestinian territories, including Hamas, the Houthis in Yemen, and disaffected anti-regime elements in the Gulf. While the US denies it is seeking to bring about regime change in Iran, this clearly is its hope. Conflict is not inevitable, but risks are elevated by combative talk – and actions – from a Washington that seems bent on engaging in the sort of brinkmanship that threatens more serious conflict in a region already on edge. Washington’s deployment of an aircraft carrier battle group and B-52 bombers in the Gulf region is amplifying concerns. President Donald Trump is not helping; to the contrary. On one hand, he invites Iran’s leaders to talk. On the other, he warns of that country’s annihilation. This sort of bombast, the antithesis of wielding a big stick and talking softly, coincides with tightening US sanctions that are doing significant damage to Iran’s economy. These measures include sanctions imposed this month on Iran’s industrial metals sector. This sector accounts for about 10 per cent of its export economy. How Tehran responds to these harsh assaults on its economic lifelines is anyone’s guess, but what is certain is that its response will not be passive. Already this month we have witnessed two sets of terrorist attacks on Gulf oil interests Iran, or its proxies, are blamed for an assault on four ships in which explosives damaged the hulls. Two of these vessels are Saudi-owned. In the second, Iran proxies are blamed for drone strikes on a Saudi Arabian oil pipeline. In response to terrorist threats to its eastern oil-rich provinces, Saudi Arabia’s state-controlled media have begun calling for “surgical strikes” against Iranian interests. Such action would provoke a wider conflagration. What tends to be overlooked in all of this is the ease with which Iran, on a previous occasion, stifled oil shipments from the Gulf. In 1984, Iran was widely believed to have been responsible for rolling second world war mines into Gulf waterways in the so-called “tanker war” with Iraq. This destroyed several vessels and brought tanker traffic to a halt for weeks. Adding to jitters are recent reports that a Katyusha rocket fell near the American embassy in central Baghdad. Iranian-backed militias, with their strongholds across the Tigris River in the east of the city, are suspected of launching the rocket. Washington had already ordered non-essential US personnel out of Baghdad. Oil giant ExxonMobil has begun moving employees out of the region. The US has warned commercial air traffic of increased risks in the Gulf. This is a movie we have seen before, in the first Gulf War and in the 2003 invasion of Iraq to remove Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Iran proved to be a significant beneficiary of the chaos that resulted from a destabilisation of the Middle East following the US-led invasion. None of this is contributing to a stable oil market, on which the global economy rests. On top of punitive sanctions against Iran, sanctions on Venezuela and disruptions in Libya caused by a civil war have unsettled markets. Dramatic cuts in Iran’s oil shipments due to US-imposed sanctions followed Washington’s withdrawal last year from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) aimed at forestalling Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Until sanctions started to bite, Iran was the second-largest exporter among Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), behind Saudi Arabia. At their peak, Iranian exports were about 3 million barrels a day. That number has now slid to 500,000 barrels or less, according to oil market analysts. But in its attempts to skirt US sanctions, Iran is no longer reporting production to OPEC and is not providing definitive information on exports. As things stand, US sanctions are being adhered to by most importers of Iranian crude, with the likely exceptions being China and India. The US removed waivers on countries accepting Iran’s oil in November after withdrawing from the JCPOA in May 2018. The 2015 agreement, negotiated by the Obama administration in partnership with the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany, froze Iran’s nuclear program for 15 years. The agreement was designed to provide an opportunity for the West to take counter-measures in case Iran upscaled its production of fissionable material. By withdrawing from the JCPOA without a fallback position beyond punitive sanctions and threats of military action, the US has separated itself from its allies and left itself few options beyond further sanctions – or military threats. That is, unless Trump’s offers of direct negotiations with Iran’s leaders bear fruit. At this stage, a tense standoff in the world’s most volatile region is not only dangerous, it could have been avoided by the US adhering to an agreement that was far from perfect, but better than the alternative. That alternative is estrangement from its allies on Iran, and now real risks of a further security deterioration in the volatile Gulf. Philip Gordon, a Middle East specialist at the Council on Foreign Relations, summed up the dilemma for US policy and that of its allies rendered anxious by risks of adventurism in the Gulf in pursuit of an American goal of regime change in Tehran. He wrote that barring something extraordinary such as the collapse of the Iranian regime, "It’s hard to see how this current conflict could end without the United States backing down or with a further and very dangerous escalation. The Trump administration should have considered all this before it walked away from the nuclear deal in the first place." (Tony Walker is Adjunct Professor, School of Communications, La Trobe University) (This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article) (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL.)

Trouble in the Gulf as US-Iran dispute threatens to escalate into serious conflict

He said the US, should it be threatened, would have no choice but to destroy North Korea

READ: Full text of Donald Trump's UN speech

us-iran-deal

Us Iran Deal, News on Us Iran Deal, stories on Us Iran Deal, articles on Us Iran Deal, Us Iran Deal stories at Wion, Us Iran Deal news, Us Iran Deal latest news

us iran-deal

Trump says Iran deal will be signed within 48 hours; Tehran weighs presidential signing

Trump invokes Cold War-era law after Iran war depletes weapon stockpiles