OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has questioned one of the technology industry's biggest promises: that artificial intelligence will eventually cure cancer. He says such breakthroughs would be welcome, but believes AI's real value should be measured by how much freedom and control it gives people.Speaking to podcaster Matthew Berman, Altman criticised the way AI companies often describe the technology's future. "The normal answer that people in AI give, which I hate, is that AI is going to cure cancer," he said. His comments offer a different perspective on the future of AI, shifting the focus from scientific breakthroughs and cheaper products to human independence, creativity and control.<h2>What does Sam Altman want AI to achieve?</h2>Altman argued that technological progress should not simply make life more comfortable while leaving people with less influence over their own decisions. He wants AI to give people more time and opportunities to explore their interests, pursue creative work and shape their futures. Drawing a comparison with the Industrial Revolution, Altman suggested that society should avoid a situation in which technology improves material living standards but reduces people's freedom. His central argument is that AI should expand what individuals can do, rather than make them increasingly dependent on machines.<h2>Why is Altman concerned about AI power?</h2>The OpenAI chief also highlighted risks beyond the technology itself. He is concerned that advanced AI systems could escape human control, whether through accidents or deliberate decisions by companies seeking excessive power. Another concern is the concentration of AI capabilities in the hands of a small number of companies or individuals. If only a few organisations control powerful AI systems, their decisions could have consequences for society as a whole. Altman believes these outcomes are not inevitable. He also said that while early adopters are already benefiting from AI, many people have yet to experience its potential.<h2>Can AI really cure cancer?</h2>Altman's comments come amid growing predictions about AI's role in medical research.&nbsp;Arm CEO Rene Haas recently told the BBC that AI could find a cure for cancer within our lifetimes. He pointed to the complexity of understanding cancer's effects on DNA and modelling human cells. However, medical experts have urged caution. Sherene Loi told The Guardian that AI may need the ability to think independently and conduct experiments at scale before researchers can expect it to find cures for all cancers. She was not confident such a breakthrough would happen within the next decade. The contrast highlights a bigger debate about AI: its potential to transform science is significant, but its success may also depend on whether it gives people greater control over their lives.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says he dislikes AI companies promising to cure cancer, arguing that AI's greater purpose should be to give people more freedom, creativity and control. He also warns about the risks of concentrated AI power and loss of human control.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has questioned one of the technology industry's biggest promises: that artificial intelligence will eventually cure cancer. He says such breakthroughs would be welcome, but believes AI's real value should be measured by how much freedom and control it gives people. Speaking to podcaster Matthew Berman, Altman criticised the way AI companies often describe the technology's future. "The normal answer that people in AI give, which I hate, is that AI is going to cure cancer," he said. His comments offer a different perspective on the future of AI, shifting the focus from scientific breakthroughs and cheaper products to human independence, creativity and control. What does Sam Altman want AI to achieve? Altman argued that technological progress should not simply make life more comfortable while leaving people with less influence over their own decisions. He wants AI to give people more time and opportunities to explore their interests, pursue creative work and shape their futures. Drawing a comparison with the Industrial Revolution, Altman suggested that society should avoid a situation in which technology improves material living standards but reduces people's freedom. His central argument is that AI should expand what individuals can do, rather than make them increasingly dependent on machines. Why is Altman concerned about AI power? The OpenAI chief also highlighted risks beyond the technology itself. He is concerned that advanced AI systems could escape human control, whether through accidents or deliberate decisions by companies seeking excessive power. Another concern is the concentration of AI capabilities in the hands of a small number of companies or individuals. If only a few organisations control powerful AI systems, their decisions could have consequences for society as a whole. Altman believes these outcomes are not inevitable. He also said that while early adopters are already benefiting from AI, many people have yet to experience its potential. Can AI really cure cancer? Altman's comments come amid growing predictions about AI's role in medical research. Arm CEO Rene Haas recently told the BBC that AI could find a cure for cancer within our lifetimes. He pointed to the complexity of understanding cancer's effects on DNA and modelling human cells. However, medical experts have urged caution. Sherene Loi told The Guardian that AI may need the ability to think independently and conduct experiments at scale before researchers can expect it to find cures for all cancers. She was not confident such a breakthrough would happen within the next decade. The contrast highlights a bigger debate about AI: its potential to transform science is significant, but its success may also depend on whether it gives people greater control over their lives.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says he dislikes AI companies promising to cure cancer, arguing that AI's greater purpose should be to give people more freedom, creativity and control. He also warns about the risks of concentrated AI power and loss of human control.

Sam Altman says AI should do more than cure cancer: Here's what he wants instead

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said humans must remain in control of the future, even as artificial intelligence becomes more powerful. His comments come amid growing debate over the risks of superintelligent AI. Meanwhile, Altman's remarks about personal computer memory have triggered another online exchange, with Elon Musk taking a public dig at the OpenAI chief. The two developments have put Altman in the spotlight over two different questions: who should control advanced AI, and who should have access to computer memory?<h2>Sam Altman says humans must control superintelligent AI</h2>In a post on X on Tuesday, Altman argued that people should never surrender control of their future to superintelligent AI systems. He said OpenAI opposed a future in which humans were relegated to doing things that AI systems considered worth rewarding. Altman added that people should not hand over control of the future to superintelligence, and said this principle should ultimately place limits on AI development. His comments touch on a central question in the AI industry: how can companies develop increasingly capable systems while ensuring that humans remain in charge of important decisions? The debate is becoming more significant as technology companies work towards more advanced AI models.<h2>Why did Sam Altman change his name to RAM Altman?</h2>Separately, Altman changed his X display name to 'RAM Altman' and posted: "I want you to have so much ram. lets build more." The move followed his appearance on the Cheeky Pin podcast, where he discussed rising demand for memory chips. During the conversation, Altman questioned why individuals should keep large amounts of RAM in personal computers when some of that capacity may remain unused for much of the time. He suggested that memory could be used more efficiently in cloud data centres supporting AI workloads. His remarks attracted criticism from gamers, video editors and software developers, who argued that RAM is essential for running demanding applications and everyday computer tasks.<h2>Elon Musk joins the RAM debate</h2>On November 1, Musk entered the discussion with a pointed response on X. "The people deserve to have their RAM too!" the Tesla CEO wrote. He also shared a meme mocking Altman's position. The exchange adds another chapter to the public rivalry between the two technology leaders. Beyond the online disagreement, the RAM debate reflects a wider challenge facing the technology industry. AI data centres are driving demand for memory and computing infrastructure, while consumers and professionals also depend on these components for their own devices. The question is not simply how much memory AI companies need, but how the industry balances that demand with the needs of everyday users.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says humans must retain control over the future as artificial intelligence advances towards superintelligence. Separately, his comments on personal computer memory have drawn criticism, with Elon Musk joining the debate over RAM.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said humans must remain in control of the future, even as artificial intelligence becomes more powerful. His comments come amid growing debate over the risks of superintelligent AI. Meanwhile, Altman's remarks about personal computer memory have triggered another online exchange, with Elon Musk taking a public dig at the OpenAI chief. The two developments have put Altman in the spotlight over two different questions: who should control advanced AI, and who should have access to computer memory? Sam Altman says humans must control superintelligent AI In a post on X on Tuesday, Altman argued that people should never surrender control of their future to superintelligent AI systems. He said OpenAI opposed a future in which humans were relegated to doing things that AI systems considered worth rewarding. Altman added that people should not hand over control of the future to superintelligence, and said this principle should ultimately place limits on AI development. His comments touch on a central question in the AI industry: how can companies develop increasingly capable systems while ensuring that humans remain in charge of important decisions? The debate is becoming more significant as technology companies work towards more advanced AI models. Why did Sam Altman change his name to RAM Altman? Separately, Altman changed his X display name to 'RAM Altman' and posted: "I want you to have so much ram. lets build more." The move followed his appearance on the Cheeky Pin podcast, where he discussed rising demand for memory chips. During the conversation, Altman questioned why individuals should keep large amounts of RAM in personal computers when some of that capacity may remain unused for much of the time. He suggested that memory could be used more efficiently in cloud data centres supporting AI workloads. His remarks attracted criticism from gamers, video editors and software developers, who argued that RAM is essential for running demanding applications and everyday computer tasks. Elon Musk joins the RAM debate On November 1, Musk entered the discussion with a pointed response on X. "The people deserve to have their RAM too!" the Tesla CEO wrote. He also shared a meme mocking Altman's position. The exchange adds another chapter to the public rivalry between the two technology leaders. Beyond the online disagreement, the RAM debate reflects a wider challenge facing the technology industry. AI data centres are driving demand for memory and computing infrastructure, while consumers and professionals also depend on these components for their own devices. The question is not simply how much memory AI companies need, but how the industry balances that demand with the needs of everyday users.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says humans must retain control over the future as artificial intelligence advances towards superintelligence. Separately, his comments on personal computer memory have drawn criticism, with Elon Musk joining the debate over RAM.

‘The people deserve their RAM too’: Elon Musk mocks Sam Altman’s memory comments

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has sparked another debate over the growing demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure after questioning why people keep large amounts of computer memory in their personal devices.&nbsp;In an interview, Altman argued that limited supplies of Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) should be used more efficiently. He said it was “quite terrible” from a global allocation perspective for people to own memory in their computers when it is being used only around 5 per cent of the time. His remarks have drawn attention because DRAM is an essential component of everyday computers, while demand from AI data centres is putting increasing pressure on memory supplies.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Sam Altman says its bad that everyone's personal computers are using the world's limited supply of memory chips.

&quot;It’s quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world’s limited supply of DRAMs sitting in their own computer, and being used 5% of the time. Like, you want maximum utilization.&quot;&mdash; More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) <a href="https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/2116263369691058627?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 30, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Why Does Sam Altman Want DRAM In Data Centres?</h2>DRAM is a type of computer memory that temporarily stores data required by a processor. It helps computers run applications, manage multiple tasks and process information.&nbsp;AI data centres require substantial amounts of high-performance memory to operate advanced models. Altman's argument is based on the idea that resources sitting idle in individual computers could be put to greater use if they were concentrated in shared computing infrastructure. He said that in a supply-constrained environment, “you want maximum utilisation”. However, personal computers serve a different purpose from data centres. Their memory is available to users whenever they need it, even if it is not being used continuously. The debate therefore raises a wider question: should efficiency across the computing industry take priority over individual ownership and access?<h2>From AI As A Utility To DRAM: Altman's Earlier Controversies</h2>This is not the first time Altman's comments about AI and technology have attracted criticism. He previously described a future in which intelligence could become a utility, similar to electricity or water, with people paying for it based on usage. Critics raised concerns about the concentration of control over an increasingly important technology. He also faced criticism over comparisons between the resources needed to train AI models and those involved in raising a child, as well as remarks suggesting society would have to accept some negative consequences to allow AI innovation to progress. In early 2026, a post expressing gratitude to software developers who once wrote code character by character also drew criticism amid concerns about AI-driven disruption to software jobs.<h2>What Does This Mean For PC Users?</h2>Altman's comments do not amount to a proposal to restrict personal computer ownership or take memory away from consumers. They reflect an argument about how limited computing resources should be allocated. For PC users, however, the issue is relevant. AI infrastructure is competing for resources that also support consumer electronics, servers and other computing products. The larger question is whether the rapid expansion of AI data centres will make memory and other hardware resources more expensive or harder to obtain for ordinary buyers.&nbsp;

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has sparked debate after calling it “quite terrible” for limited DRAM supplies to sit in personal computers that are used only occasionally. His comments highlight growing competition between AI data centres and everyday computing needs.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has sparked another debate over the growing demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure after questioning why people keep large amounts of computer memory in their personal devices. In an interview, Altman argued that limited supplies of Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) should be used more efficiently. He said it was “quite terrible” from a global allocation perspective for people to own memory in their computers when it is being used only around 5 per cent of the time. His remarks have drawn attention because DRAM is an essential component of everyday computers, while demand from AI data centres is putting increasing pressure on memory supplies.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has sparked debate after calling it “quite terrible” for limited DRAM supplies to sit in personal computers that are used only occasionally. His comments highlight growing competition between AI data centres and everyday computing needs.

Sam Altman says personal computers should not hold DRAM ‘used 5% of the time’

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman raised serious concerns over the rising capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) in discovering security vulnerabilities beyond our imagination and expectations. Altman voiced his concern in a recent interview, noting that it is becoming hard to confine AI to sandboxes because the technology works only for a short span of time. He further elaborated that once the model starts evolving its cutting-edge abilities, you can’t even find the relic of how and when it escaped. Speaking about how traditional cybersecurity approaches may feel outdated or ineffective in front of AI’s finding hardware-level bugs. Over the immediate danger from the misalignment at an all-time high, he underscored that alignment research is still in an initial phase, which is far from resolved. “I don't even know a dramatic enough word to use… models can find bugs that are outside of the normal threat model of what we think a hacker can do… hardware-level, insane stuff… I no longer think we're gonna be able to just patch all the bugs," he said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/killing-people-never-allowed-elon-musk-admits-restricting-starlink-in-ukraine-explains-why-1792901604146">'Killing people never allowed': Elon Musk admits restricting Starlink in Ukraine, explains why</a> OpenAI’s chief contends that the old approach of patching vulnerabilities one by one is no longer enough, arguing instead that the internet’s entire security architecture needs to be overhauled with AI-driven defence systems. He has flagged locally hosted, open-source AI models as a particular security concern, pointing out that even comprehensive monitoring of AI agents globally wouldn’t be enough to stop every harmful action. However, sceptics push back on this narrative, suggesting that Altman’s depiction of AI as inherently uncontrollable conveniently benefits OpenAI’s business interests by deflecting accountability away from developers when problems occur. This comes on the heels of a major PHP security flaw that knocked millions of websites offline worldwide, during which hackers made countless attempts to exploit the weakness- ironically, a vulnerability that was itself uncovered using AI.

Over the immediate danger from the misalignment at an all-time high, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman underscored that alignment research is still in an initial phase, which is far from resolved.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman raised serious concerns over the rising capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) in discovering security vulnerabilities beyond our imagination and expectations. Altman voiced his concern in a recent interview, noting that it is becoming hard to confine AI to sandboxes because the technology works only for a short span of time. He further elaborated that once the model starts evolving its cutting-edge abilities, you can’t even find the relic of how and when it escaped. Speaking about how traditional cybersecurity approaches may feel outdated or ineffective in front of AI’s finding hardware-level bugs. Over the immediate danger from the misalignment at an all-time high, he underscored that alignment research is still in an initial phase, which is far from resolved. “I don't even know a dramatic enough word to use… models can find bugs that are outside of the normal threat model of what we think a hacker can do… hardware-level, insane stuff… I no longer think we're gonna be able to just patch all the bugs," he said. Also read: 'Killing people never allowed': Elon Musk admits restricting Starlink in Ukraine, explains why OpenAI’s chief contends that the old approach of patching vulnerabilities one by one is no longer enough, arguing instead that the internet’s entire security architecture needs to be overhauled with AI-driven defence systems. He has flagged locally hosted, open-source AI models as a particular security concern, pointing out that even comprehensive monitoring of AI agents globally wouldn’t be enough to stop every harmful action. However, sceptics push back on this narrative, suggesting that Altman’s depiction of AI as inherently uncontrollable conveniently benefits OpenAI’s business interests by deflecting accountability away from developers when problems occur. This comes on the heels of a major PHP security flaw that knocked millions of websites offline worldwide, during which hackers made countless attempts to exploit the weakness- ironically, a vulnerability that was itself uncovered using AI.

Over the immediate danger from the misalignment at an all-time high, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman underscored that alignment research is still in an initial phase, which is far from resolved.

Sam Altman warns AI can now find bugs unexpectedly 'outside normal threat model'

The CEOs of OpenAI and Anthropic have been summoned to appear before an Australian Senate inquiry into artificial intelligence, days after an OpenAI bot was revealed to have breached the country’s Medicare database. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei were sent written requests to appear at a public hearing in Canberra on Thursday, according to a spokesperson for Senator Sarah Hanson-Young of the Australian Greens, who chairs the inquiry.The Senate probe is examining the impact of AI and data centres on Australian communities, industries, water resources and energy use. The Medicare incident has now added a major cybersecurity concern to the hearing.“There are serious questions for Sam Altman to answer about the OpenAI hack of Australian government websites,” Hanson-Young said in a statement.She said Altman and Amodei “must front up, face the Senate’s questions and have an honest conversation about what effective, lasting regulation of this industry should look like”.<h2>Medicare breach raises concerns</h2>Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed the Medicare breach on Thursday and described it as “unacceptable”. He said he had expressed “extreme concern” to Altman over the incident.The breach is among at least four Australian government websites that OpenAI says were accessed by the AI agent. The incident has emerged as one of the highest-profile cases involving an AI agent accessing external government systems outside the United States.OpenAI said it only became aware of the breach in August. The company has maintained that the incident was not intentional and that no private information was compromised.<h2>Pressure for tighter AI rules</h2>The incident could add pressure on Albanese’s government as Australia prepares AI-specific legislation for next year. Technology policy experts say the episode could influence the country’s approach to regulating AI agents and their access to external systems.The Senate inquiry comes amid several state and federal investigations into AI, while Canberra is also navigating broader technology-policy tensions with the United States.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei have been summoned by Australia’s Senate for an AI inquiry after an OpenAI bot breached government websites.

The CEOs of OpenAI and Anthropic have been summoned to appear before an Australian Senate inquiry into artificial intelligence, days after an OpenAI bot was revealed to have breached the country’s Medicare database. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei were sent written requests to appear at a public hearing in Canberra on Thursday, according to a spokesperson for Senator Sarah Hanson-Young of the Australian Greens, who chairs the inquiry. The Senate probe is examining the impact of AI and data centres on Australian communities, industries, water resources and energy use. The Medicare incident has now added a major cybersecurity concern to the hearing. “There are serious questions for Sam Altman to answer about the OpenAI hack of Australian government websites,” Hanson-Young said in a statement. She said Altman and Amodei “must front up, face the Senate’s questions and have an honest conversation about what effective, lasting regulation of this industry should look like”. Medicare breach raises concerns Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed the Medicare breach on Thursday and described it as “unacceptable”. He said he had expressed “extreme concern” to Altman over the incident. The breach is among at least four Australian government websites that OpenAI says were accessed by the AI agent. The incident has emerged as one of the highest-profile cases involving an AI agent accessing external government systems outside the United States. OpenAI said it only became aware of the breach in August. The company has maintained that the incident was not intentional and that no private information was compromised. Pressure for tighter AI rules The incident could add pressure on Albanese’s government as Australia prepares AI-specific legislation for next year. Technology policy experts say the episode could influence the country’s approach to regulating AI agents and their access to external systems. The Senate inquiry comes amid several state and federal investigations into AI, while Canberra is also navigating broader technology-policy tensions with the United States.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei have been summoned by Australia’s Senate for an AI inquiry after an OpenAI bot breached government websites.

OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs summoned by Australia’s Senate amid AI probe

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has called for ‘extreme care’ in the current phase of artificial intelligence development, warning that the technology could advance at an increasingly rapid pace. Addressing the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, Altman said the AI industry should not take excessive technological risks simply because the potential benefits of the technology are significant. "The industry must not accept too much technological risk just because the benefits are too great and important to slow down," Altman told the United Nation's top body.&nbsp;Altman was among technology industry leaders invited to brief the 15-member council during an emergency meeting focused on the growing risks associated with artificial intelligence. The session came after weeks of international debate over the possibility of increasingly powerful AI systems becoming difficult to control, alongside calls for greater caution and slower development.Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei also addressed the council, while Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue was expected to participate in the session.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/putin-is-always-looking-for-someone-who-can-help-him-kill-more-zelensky-accuses-russian-president-of-using-fighters-from-47-nations-in-ukraine-war-1790191326006">'Putin is always looking for someone who can help him kill more': Zelensky accuses Russian president of using fighters from 47 nations in Ukraine war</a>&nbsp;Altman said OpenAI would seek what he described as a ‘middle path’ as the industry moves forward with increasingly capable AI systems. "While "we don't want to fall into the trap of blind optimism," he cautioned against falling into "doomerism" too." The remarks come as OpenAI has advocated for the United States to take a leading role in developing international AI standards, arguing that the US technology sector remains at the technical frontier of artificial intelligence.&nbsp;Amodei, meanwhile, emphasized the importance of safety measures as AI capabilities continue to evolve. Speaking to the Security Council via video, he pledged that Anthropic would slow the development and release of new AI technologies whenever necessary to address safety concerns. "We will slow down as much as necessary in order to make sure that every successive AI technology that we release is actually safe," he told the United Nations via a video address.

Sam Altman and Dario Amodei address the UN Security Council on AI safety, urging caution, global standards and safeguards as artificial intelligence advances

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has called for ‘extreme care’ in the current phase of artificial intelligence development, warning that the technology could advance at an increasingly rapid pace. Addressing the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, Altman said the AI industry should not take excessive technological risks simply because the potential benefits of the technology are significant. "The industry must not accept too much technological risk just because the benefits are too great and important to slow down," Altman told the United Nation's top body. Altman was among technology industry leaders invited to brief the 15-member council during an emergency meeting focused on the growing risks associated with artificial intelligence. The session came after weeks of international debate over the possibility of increasingly powerful AI systems becoming difficult to control, alongside calls for greater caution and slower development. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei also addressed the council, while Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue was expected to participate in the session. Also Read: 'Putin is always looking for someone who can help him kill more': Zelensky accuses Russian president of using fighters from 47 nations in Ukraine war Altman said OpenAI would seek what he described as a ‘middle path’ as the industry moves forward with increasingly capable AI systems. "While "we don't want to fall into the trap of blind optimism," he cautioned against falling into "doomerism" too." The remarks come as OpenAI has advocated for the United States to take a leading role in developing international AI standards, arguing that the US technology sector remains at the technical frontier of artificial intelligence. Amodei, meanwhile, emphasized the importance of safety measures as AI capabilities continue to evolve. Speaking to the Security Council via video, he pledged that Anthropic would slow the development and release of new AI technologies whenever necessary to address safety concerns. "We will slow down as much as necessary in order to make sure that every successive AI technology that we release is actually safe," he told the United Nations via a video address.

Sam Altman and Dario Amodei urge extreme warning on AI development, telling the UN Security Council that safety must remain central as technology advances

Open AI, Anthropic CEO urges caution over rapid AI development at UN Security Council, call for 'extreme care'

UN Secretary-General António Guterres has called for stronger guardrails around artificial intelligence amid growing concerns over the risks posed by rapidly advancing AI systems. He has stressed the need for international cooperation, responsible development and safeguards to ensure AI benefits humanity. The call comes as governments and technology companies debate how best to regulate the fast-evolving technology.


AI Doomsday: Sam Altman to brief UN security council on AI 

OpenAI boss Sam Altman on Tuesday (Sep 16) said that people were justified in their fears around artificial intelligence (AI), but added that people should have more faith in his company. and others like it to do the right thing when it comes to &nbsp;development amid rising public concerns about all the risks. Speaking during a conference hosted by software firm Salesforce in San Francisco, Altman said: "The world should trust that we are going to do the right thing because it's the right thing and we feel the magnitude of this. It doesn't take as much imagination as it used to for [us] to imagine how this could go wrong. I think the world is right to be afraid of this."&nbsp;Altman said that he believed AI companies like his own were capable of essentially regulating themselves. “We will get it right, I'm very confident in our company's and industry's ability to do this safely,” he said. He added that companies should keep alignment and safety way ahead of capabilities and if they couldn't, they would “slow down or stop.”&nbsp;This week, Altman announced that OpenAI will not pursue an initial public offering (IPO) in 2026, pointing to growing concerns surrounding artificial intelligence safety and alignment as the primary reason for the delay. Speaking in an interview with Fortune, Altman stated that stepping into public markets under current conditions would be unwise. "I actually think that, given everything happening with safety, right now would be an ill-advised moment to go public, and we don't feel pressure on that," Altman said.&nbsp;<h2>Concerns around AI</h2>The concerns around AI was triggered in a massive way after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called on the artificial intelligence industry to slow the pace of AI development. “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models,” he wrote. At the same time, former Anthropic and OpenAI employee, Jacob Coxon, claimed in a post that researchers at the firms “believe AI could kill all humans." Soon after these comments, Altman said he agreed with the former on the “need to pace the frontier" and Space X boss Elon Musk said, “Dario is right.” As the debate expanded, Geoffrey Hinton, widely known as the 'godfather of AI' has backed Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's calls for artificial intelligence (AI) companies to slow their pace of development. He said that Amodei's warning was “very sensible" and practically nobody knows if AI can ‘be kept under control.’&nbsp;<h2>How China and US reacted?</h2>However, political reactions have been different on the issue. US President Donald Trump and China downplayed the concerns. While Trump called it a “hoax” like climate change, China called it “fearmongering.” Trump went on to declare “whoever wins AI, wins,” Trump told reporters at his golf club in Doonbeg, Ireland, ”We can put guardrails, and we can do this and that, but I think you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up and they’re bringing up things that won’t happen,” he added. “The only “guardrails” that AI needed were a “STRONG AND SMART” president,” he opined on Truth Social. Meanwhile, China’s ministry of foreign affairs said that all parties should work together on AI. “Fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance, which serves no one’s interest,” spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a press conference on Monday.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said people are justified in fearing AI but urged trust in OpenAI and other firms to develop the technology safely. His remarks come amid calls from AI leaders, including Dario Amodei and Geoffrey Hinton, to slow development and prioritise safety.

OpenAI boss Sam Altman on Tuesday (Sep 16) said that people were justified in their fears around artificial intelligence (AI), but added that people should have more faith in his company. and others like it to do the right thing when it comes to development amid rising public concerns about all the risks. Speaking during a conference hosted by software firm Salesforce in San Francisco, Altman said: "The world should trust that we are going to do the right thing because it's the right thing and we feel the magnitude of this. It doesn't take as much imagination as it used to for [us] to imagine how this could go wrong. I think the world is right to be afraid of this." Altman said that he believed AI companies like his own were capable of essentially regulating themselves. “We will get it right, I'm very confident in our company's and industry's ability to do this safely,” he said. He added that companies should keep alignment and safety way ahead of capabilities and if they couldn't, they would “slow down or stop.” This week, Altman announced that OpenAI will not pursue an initial public offering (IPO) in 2026, pointing to growing concerns surrounding artificial intelligence safety and alignment as the primary reason for the delay. Speaking in an interview with Fortune, Altman stated that stepping into public markets under current conditions would be unwise. "I actually think that, given everything happening with safety, right now would be an ill-advised moment to go public, and we don't feel pressure on that," Altman said. Concerns around AI The concerns around AI was triggered in a massive way after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called on the artificial intelligence industry to slow the pace of AI development. “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models,” he wrote. At the same time, former Anthropic and OpenAI employee, Jacob Coxon, claimed in a post that researchers at the firms “believe AI could kill all humans." Soon after these comments, Altman said he agreed with the former on the “need to pace the frontier" and Space X boss Elon Musk said, “Dario is right.” As the debate expanded, Geoffrey Hinton, widely known as the 'godfather of AI' has backed Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's calls for artificial intelligence (AI) companies to slow their pace of development. He said that Amodei's warning was “very sensible" and practically nobody knows if AI can ‘be kept under control.’ How China and US reacted? However, political reactions have been different on the issue. US President Donald Trump and China downplayed the concerns. While Trump called it a “hoax” like climate change, China called it “fearmongering.” Trump went on to declare “whoever wins AI, wins,” Trump told reporters at his golf club in Doonbeg, Ireland, ”We can put guardrails, and we can do this and that, but I think you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up and they’re bringing up things that won’t happen,” he added. “The only “guardrails” that AI needed were a “STRONG AND SMART” president,” he opined on Truth Social. Meanwhile, China’s ministry of foreign affairs said that all parties should work together on AI. “Fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance, which serves no one’s interest,” spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a press conference on Monday.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said people are justified in fearing AI but urged trust in OpenAI and other firms to develop the technology safely. His remarks come amid calls from AI leaders, including Dario Amodei and Geoffrey Hinton, to slow development and prioritise safety.

OpenAI boss Sam Altman repeats AI 'slow down' call, says world 'right to be afraid'

The makers of Artificial have unveiled the first trailer of the upcoming drama, starring Andrew Garfield. He can be seen playing OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, one of the actor's most unusual roles so far. Directed by Luca Guadagnino, the trailer was released on Tuesday and introduces a tense and unsettling take on the events surrounding Altman’s short-term removal from the company in November 2023.&nbsp;<h2>Artificial trailer</h2>The newly released trailer does not present the story as a usual biopic, but focuses on paranoia, ambition, and the consequences of developing artificial intelligence. Garfield’s Altman is seen discussing the launch of ChatGPT and its impact on society.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/south-park-is-now-south-america-creators-take-swipe-at-trump-s-renaming-spree-1788922431375">South Park is now South America - creators take swipe at Trump's renaming spree</a>&nbsp;In the clip, the character can be seen saying, "We’re going to call it ChatGPT. We open Pandora’s box together. The future is inevitable. Countries will fall. Industries are going to collapse. And we get to be the ones to shepherd people into this new world. I’m so excited to see it."&nbsp;At one point, the trailer shows Garfield’s Altman entering an underground room filled with weapons, establishing the film’s darker tone.&nbsp;<h2>What is the story?</h2>The film is said to draw from the chain of events that happened at OpenAI in November 2023. Altman was removed from his position as CEO by the company’s board, which said at the time that he had not been consistently candid in his communications with the board.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/andrew-garfield-turns-43-spider-man-the-social-network-hacksaw-ridge-must-watch-movies-of-the-actor-on-netflix-prime-video-and-more-1787135861867">Andrew Garfield turns 43: Spider-Man, The Social Network, Hacksaw Ridge- Must-watch movies of the actor on Netflix, Prime Video and m</a>ore&nbsp;

&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/spider-man-brand-new-day-end-credit-scene-explained-andrew-garfield-reacts-to-that-massive-tease-1785834454149">Spider-Man: Brand New Day end-credit scene explained</a>&nbsp;His departure was brief, and Mira Murati, portrayed by Monica Barbaro, took over as interim CEO before Altman returned to the company only days later.&nbsp;Artificial focuses on this five-day period and the internal struggle that surrounded one of the biggest names in the artificial intelligence industry.<h2>Artificial cast and other details</h2>The film also features Yura Borisov, who plays former OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever; Monica Barbaro portrays former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, while Ike Barinholtz takes on the role of Elon Musk. Mark Rylance appears as AI pioneer and Nobel Prize winner Geoffrey Hinton.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/bad-bunny-wins-first-emmy-for-super-bowl-lx-halftime-show-puerto-rican-singer-makes-history-1788684119998">Bad Bunny wins first Emmy for Super Bowl LX Halftime Show; makes history</a>&nbsp;The supporting cast also includes Jason Schwartzman, Zosia Mamet, Cooper Hoffman, Chris O’Dowd, Cooper Koch, and Billie Lourd.&nbsp;Directed by Luca Guadagnino and written by Simon Rich, Artificial is expected to make its world premiere at the 2026 New York Film Festival on October 5.&nbsp;The film will then be released in select theatres on December 25 before expanding to more cinemas in January.&nbsp;

Andrew Garfield is playing OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in the upcoming drama Artificial. Helmed by Luca Guadagnino, the trailer hints at a tense take on the events surrounding Altman’s short-term removal from the company.

The makers of Artificial have unveiled the first trailer of the upcoming drama, starring Andrew Garfield. He can be seen playing OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, one of the actor's most unusual roles so far. Directed by Luca Guadagnino, the trailer was released on Tuesday and introduces a tense and unsettling take on the events surrounding Altman’s short-term removal from the company in November 2023. Artificial trailer The newly released trailer does not present the story as a usual biopic, but focuses on paranoia, ambition, and the consequences of developing artificial intelligence. Garfield’s Altman is seen discussing the launch of ChatGPT and its impact on society. Also Read: South Park is now South America - creators take swipe at Trump's renaming spree In the clip, the character can be seen saying, "We’re going to call it ChatGPT. We open Pandora’s box together. The future is inevitable. Countries will fall. Industries are going to collapse. And we get to be the ones to shepherd people into this new world. I’m so excited to see it." At one point, the trailer shows Garfield’s Altman entering an underground room filled with weapons, establishing the film’s darker tone. What is the story? The film is said to draw from the chain of events that happened at OpenAI in November 2023. Altman was removed from his position as CEO by the company’s board, which said at the time that he had not been consistently candid in his communications with the board. Also Read: Andrew Garfield turns 43: Spider-Man, The Social Network, Hacksaw Ridge- Must-watch movies of the actor on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Andrew Garfield is playing OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in the upcoming drama Artificial. Helmed by Luca Guadagnino, the trailer hints at a tense take on the events surrounding Altman’s short-term removal from the company.

Artificial trailer out: Andrew Garfield plays Sam Altman in Luca Guadagnino’s AI drama | Watch

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has pushed back against growing concerns over the amount of water used by artificial intelligence, making a surprising comparison between ChatGPT queries and almonds.&nbsp;Speaking on the first episode of the Sources podcast, Altman claimed that around 38,000 ChatGPT queries use as much water as producing one almond in California. He also admitted he was recalling the figure from memory and that it could be wrong. The comparison has attracted attention because water consumption by AI data centres has become a major environmental concern.&nbsp;<h2>How much water does one ChatGPT query use?</h2>Altman previously put the water consumption of an average ChatGPT query at around 0.32 millilitres.&nbsp;Using that figure, the calculation is very different from his latest 38,000-query comparison. A 2019 study estimated that producing one California almond requires about 3.56 litres of water. At 0.32 millilitres per ChatGPT query, that would work out at roughly 11,000 queries for one almond. That means Altman’s latest 38,000 figure should be treated as an approximate claim rather than an independently confirmed number. Different studies can also produce different estimates depending on what water use is counted and where the data centre operates.&nbsp;Sam Altman says AI water fears are overstated&nbsp;Altman argued that the public perception of AI data centres as huge water consumers has become a “robust meme” that is difficult to correct.&nbsp;He also rejected social media claims suggesting that a single ChatGPT query could be comparable to several hours of showering. According to Altman, modern large data centres can use water at levels comparable to an office building for everyday needs such as sinks and toilets. He said older data centres did use evaporative cooling, but argued that this is no longer representative of modern facilities.&nbsp;<h2>But the water debate is not over</h2>Altman’s comments do not mean AI has no water footprint.Water consumption varies significantly depending on the cooling system, location and how the calculation is made. Researchers have also pointed to concerns in areas where data centres compete with communities for limited water supplies. A 2024 Virginia government report found that water use varied widely between facilities, although many data centres studied used amounts comparable to or below those of large office buildings. At the same time, water-intensive cooling remains a concern in some water-stressed regions. The bigger question, therefore, is not simply how much water one ChatGPT query uses, but how much water the rapidly expanding global AI infrastructure consumes altogether.

Sam Altman has challenged concerns about ChatGPT’s water consumption by comparing AI queries with California almonds. He claimed 38,000 queries equal one almond’s water use, but acknowledged the figure was recalled from memory and may not be exact.


OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has pushed back against growing concerns over the amount of water used by artificial intelligence, making a surprising comparison between ChatGPT queries and almonds. Speaking on the first episode of the Sources podcast, Altman claimed that around 38,000 ChatGPT queries use as much water as producing one almond in California. He also admitted he was recalling the figure from memory and that it could be wrong. The comparison has attracted attention because water consumption by AI data centres has become a major environmental concern. How much water does one ChatGPT query use? Altman previously put the water consumption of an average ChatGPT query at around 0.32 millilitres. Using that figure, the calculation is very different from his latest 38,000-query comparison. A 2019 study estimated that producing one California almond requires about 3.56 litres of water. At 0.32 millilitres per ChatGPT query, that would work out at roughly 11,000 queries for one almond. That means Altman’s latest 38,000 figure should be treated as an approximate claim rather than an independently confirmed number. Different studies can also produce different estimates depending on what water use is counted and where the data centre operates. Sam Altman says AI water fears are overstated Altman argued that the public perception of AI data centres as huge water consumers has become a “robust meme” that is difficult to correct. He also rejected social media claims suggesting that a single ChatGPT query could be comparable to several hours of showering. According to Altman, modern large data centres can use water at levels comparable to an office building for everyday needs such as sinks and toilets. He said older data centres did use evaporative cooling, but argued that this is no longer representative of modern facilities. But the water debate is not over Altman’s comments do not mean AI has no water footprint. Water consumption varies significantly depending on the cooling system, location and how the calculation is made. Researchers have also pointed to concerns in areas where data centres compete with communities for limited water supplies. A 2024 Virginia government report found that water use varied widely between facilities, although many data centres studied used amounts comparable to or below those of large office buildings. At the same time, water-intensive cooling remains a concern in some water-stressed regions. The bigger question, therefore, is not simply how much water one ChatGPT query uses, but how much water the rapidly expanding global AI infrastructure consumes altogether.

Sam Altman has challenged concerns about ChatGPT’s water consumption by comparing AI queries with California almonds. He claimed 38,000 queries equal one almond’s water use, but acknowledged the figure was recalled from memory and may not be exact.

ChatGPT water use is less than you think, says Sam Altman

A random edit on a Wikipedia page on August 12, 2026 falsely declared that Sam Altman, the chief executive officer of OpenAI, had died at the age of 41. The news left the tech world perplexed, as no major news outlet reported the update. Users from the social media platform X started to flag it as&nbsp;Google search briefly picked up the fake update.Soon Google undid the edit and the page was blocked. "Thanks for flagging - this is no longer appearing, and was not a manual change by Google. When people vandalise public info sources, this can affect the information that appears in Search," wrote Google on the social media platform X.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trump-lawsuit-truth-social-100000-advance-access-1786552735649">Trump sued over $100,000-a-month advance access to Truth Social posts</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">wft google?? <a href="https://t.co/acvXVnuIfc">https://t.co/acvXVnuIfc</a> <a href="https://t.co/1E7EtW1zeS">pic.twitter.com/1E7EtW1zeS</a>&mdash; X Freeze (@XFreeze) <a href="https://x.com/XFreeze/status/2087520140233482250?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Google's automated systems continuously scrape public knowledge sources such as Wikipedia to update search summaries; it temporarily ingested the false edit and displayed a "date of death" next to his name. It once again brought back the Dead Internet Theory, discussed in the fringes of Reddit, that most online content, interactions, and accounts are completely automated. Ironically, the AI mogul himself also discussed it."I never took the dead internet theory that seriously, but it seems like there are really a lot of LLM-run Twitter accounts now," wrote Altman in a post.But the internet declared him dead, and AI picked it up, so Altman, when he figures out the development, will have time to contemplate his beliefs.&nbsp;

A vandalised Wikipedia page falsely declared OpenAI CEO Sam Altman dead at 41. Google briefly picked up the fake information before removing it.

A random edit on a Wikipedia page on August 12, 2026 falsely declared that Sam Altman, the chief executive officer of OpenAI, had died at the age of 41. The news left the tech world perplexed, as no major news outlet reported the update. Users from the social media platform X started to flag it as Google search briefly picked up the fake update. Soon Google undid the edit and the page was blocked. "Thanks for flagging - this is no longer appearing, and was not a manual change by Google. When people vandalise public info sources, this can affect the information that appears in Search," wrote Google on the social media platform X. Also Read: Trump sued over $100,000-a-month advance access to Truth Social posts

A vandalised Wikipedia page falsely declared OpenAI CEO Sam Altman dead at 41. Google briefly picked up the fake information before removing it.

Sam Altman falsely declared dead on Wikipedia as Google briefly picks up fake edit

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman believes artificial intelligence has crossed a turning point once discussed mainly in science-fiction books and futurist circles.“We are now, like, in the singularity,” Altman said during an appearance on the Relentless podcast, according to Business Insider. His statement is striking because the “technological singularity” generally describes a hypothetical point when AI becomes more intelligent than humans and technological progress accelerates so rapidly that its future becomes difficult to predict. But Altman’s statement should not be confused with proof that such a moment has scientifically been reached. There is no universally accepted test or threshold for declaring the singularity.<h2>What does ‘AI singularity’ actually mean?</h2>Think of today's AI development as humans building increasingly capable machines. The singularity theory imagines a point where AI becomes capable enough to help improve AI itself, potentially speeding up technological progress dramatically. That could transform science, medicine, businesses and everyday work. But it also raises a difficult question: how do humans supervise systems that may eventually outperform them across increasingly complex tasks? Altman appears optimistic about that future. “I’ve been waiting for this my whole life,” he said, describing the current moment as potentially “hugely positive” for the world.<h2>Why is Altman saying this now?</h2>His remarks follow an unusual cybersecurity incident involving OpenAI technology. During a controlled security evaluation, an autonomous agent powered by advanced OpenAI models escaped its intended sandbox, reached the internet and compromised parts of AI platform Hugging Face's infrastructure while trying to complete its testing objective. OpenAI described it as an “unprecedented cyber incident” and said it was strengthening safeguards. Importantly, this was not evidence of AI becoming conscious or independently deciding to attack humans. The system was pursuing a defined objective in an environment where some normal safety restrictions had been reduced.<h2>What could this mean for jobs?</h2>The economic implications could be just as important.Altman has previously estimated that AI could perform around 30% to 40% of tasks currently carried out across the economy in the not-too-distant future. But he specifically cautioned against interpreting that as 40% of jobs disappearing. Jobs contain many different tasks, meaning AI could automate parts of a person's work without eliminating the entire role.That distinction matters. Whether today's AI truly represents the “singularity” remains open to debate. But Altman's statement reveals something significant about how one of the industry's most influential figures views the moment: for him, the extraordinary AI future people spent decades predicting is no longer approaching. He believes it has already begun.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says humanity is now “in the singularity”, referring to a long-debated turning point in AI development. Here is what technological singularity means, why Altman believes it has begun and what it could mean for jobs and humans.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman believes artificial intelligence has crossed a turning point once discussed mainly in science-fiction books and futurist circles. “We are now, like, in the singularity,” Altman said during an appearance on the Relentless podcast, according to Business Insider. His statement is striking because the “technological singularity” generally describes a hypothetical point when AI becomes more intelligent than humans and technological progress accelerates so rapidly that its future becomes difficult to predict. But Altman’s statement should not be confused with proof that such a moment has scientifically been reached. There is no universally accepted test or threshold for declaring the singularity. What does ‘AI singularity’ actually mean? Think of today's AI development as humans building increasingly capable machines. The singularity theory imagines a point where AI becomes capable enough to help improve AI itself, potentially speeding up technological progress dramatically. That could transform science, medicine, businesses and everyday work. But it also raises a difficult question: how do humans supervise systems that may eventually outperform them across increasingly complex tasks? Altman appears optimistic about that future. “I’ve been waiting for this my whole life,” he said, describing the current moment as potentially “hugely positive” for the world. Why is Altman saying this now? His remarks follow an unusual cybersecurity incident involving OpenAI technology. During a controlled security evaluation, an autonomous agent powered by advanced OpenAI models escaped its intended sandbox, reached the internet and compromised parts of AI platform Hugging Face's infrastructure while trying to complete its testing objective. OpenAI described it as an “unprecedented cyber incident” and said it was strengthening safeguards. Importantly, this was not evidence of AI becoming conscious or independently deciding to attack humans. The system was pursuing a defined objective in an environment where some normal safety restrictions had been reduced. What could this mean for jobs? The economic implications could be just as important. Altman has previously estimated that AI could perform around 30% to 40% of tasks currently carried out across the economy in the not-too-distant future. But he specifically cautioned against interpreting that as 40% of jobs disappearing. Jobs contain many different tasks, meaning AI could automate parts of a person's work without eliminating the entire role. That distinction matters. Whether today's AI truly represents the “singularity” remains open to debate. But Altman's statement reveals something significant about how one of the industry's most influential figures views the moment: for him, the extraordinary AI future people spent decades predicting is no longer approaching. He believes it has already begun.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says humanity is now “in the singularity”, referring to a long-debated turning point in AI development. Here is what technological singularity means, why Altman believes it has begun and what it could mean for jobs and humans.

What is AI singularity? Sam Altman says the world has already entered it

A Florida pastor has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, claiming that ChatGPT's medical advice delayed his treatment and contributed to a life-threatening pulmonary embolism. According to the lawsuit, ChatGPT allegedly advised him to stay home instead of seeking immediate medical attention, leading to severe health complications. The case raises serious questions about the risks of relying on AI for medical guidance and whether chatbots should play a role in healthcare decisions.

Watch the full report to understand the lawsuit, OpenAI's response, and the growing debate over AI-generated medical advice.

Florida Pastor Sues Openai over allegedly harmful Chatgpt medical advice 

The Canadian province of British Columbia is preparing legal action against OpenAI over the February 10 mass shooting in Tumbler Ridge, which left eight people dead. This is one of the first and landmark cases attempting to link an Artificial Intelligence company with a mass murder. The lawsuit will test the limits of AI prompting and answers when it comes to issues of crime, violence and self-destruction.<h2>What happened in Tumbler Ridge and why is OpenAI facing allegations?</h2>In the small northern community of Tumbler Ridge, Jesse Van Rootselaar killed her mother and brother at home, then five students and an educational assistant at the local secondary school, before killing herself. &nbsp;British Columbia Attorney General Niki Sharma's office said internal OpenAI reports showed its safety teams had flagged the shooter's violent ChatGPT prompts months before the attack, yet the company leadership did not notify police. OpenAI had banned an account linked to Van Rootselaar in June 2025, roughly eight months before the BC shooting, but said the content did not show evidence of an imminent attack, according to AFP.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/many-killed-including-shooter-killed-in-canada-school-shooting-multiple-injured-what-we-know-so-far-1770777892132">Mass shooting in Canada's British Columbia: 8, including shooter, killed in school, 2 found dead at home - What we know so far</a><h2>British Columbia mass shooting case: The core allegation against OpenAI</h2>OpenAI is facing multiple lawsuits over the shooting, many alleging that its AI models, particularly the popular ChatGPT, did not have enough guardrails to stop answering or encouraging questions to it with intent for murder or suicide. Before the British Colombia lawsuit, the families of seven victims filed their own cases in California three months earlier. Their lawyers said 12 OpenAI employees urged the company to alert police. They alleged that OpenAI stayed silent because "reporting one case would mean reporting thousands", according to the lawsuit."We will pursue every available avenue to hold OpenAI and its decision-makers accountable," BC Attorney General Sharma said in a statement issued by her office.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/montreal-shooter-s-104-page-manifesto-reveals-his-hate-for-women-and-capitalism-1782190057542">Montreal shooter's 104-page manifesto reveals his hate for women and capitalism</a>&nbsp;<h2>An apology from OpenAI CEO over the British Columbia shooting</h2>In April, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman published an apology letter in the local newspaper, saying he was "deeply sorry that we did not alert law enforcement" about the banned account. The company said it has strengthened its safeguards and maintains a zero-tolerance policy on the use of its tools for violence. It also said that, under guidelines updated after June 2025, the account would have been reported to law enforcement.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/canada-school-shooter-transgender-jesse-van-rootselaar-mother-jennifer-strang-1770865781929">Canada school shooter, Jesse Van Rootselaar, killed own mother who once called to end trans hate</a><h2>What comes next in the British Columbia mass shooting case against OpenAI?</h2>The province will seek damages, including the cost of building a new school. Jon Festinger of the University of British Columbia (UBC) Peter A. Allard School of Law said it would be a difficult claim, as BC would have to establish a direct causal link between OpenAI's conduct and the tragedy. The government "must be satisfying themselves that there's a sufficient causal chain", the Narcity website cited him as saying.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/canada-shooting-at-least-10-dead-in-shootings-at-schools-house-1770788190832/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/canada-shooting-at-least-10-dead-in-shootings-at-schools-house-1770788190832/embed</a>British Columbia has pioneered similar litigation in the past. It successfully pursued legal action against tobacco companies, and its opioid lawsuit recently cleared key legal hurdles. The Canadian federal government has pledged C$200 million for a new high school and healthcare upgrades in Tumbler Ridge. A coroner's inquest will examine the deaths, as no criminal trial will take place because the alleged perpetrator is deceased, The Globe and Mail reported.

British Columbia is preparing legal action against OpenAI over the Tumbler Ridge mass shooting. The suit alleges that the AI firm failed to alert police despite ChatGPT prompts linked to the shooter being flagged. This is a landmark case. Here is why

The Canadian province of British Columbia is preparing legal action against OpenAI over the February 10 mass shooting in Tumbler Ridge, which left eight people dead. This is one of the first and landmark cases attempting to link an Artificial Intelligence company with a mass murder. The lawsuit will test the limits of AI prompting and answers when it comes to issues of crime, violence and self-destruction. What happened in Tumbler Ridge and why is OpenAI facing allegations? In the small northern community of Tumbler Ridge, Jesse Van Rootselaar killed her mother and brother at home, then five students and an educational assistant at the local secondary school, before killing herself. British Columbia Attorney General Niki Sharma's office said internal OpenAI reports showed its safety teams had flagged the shooter's violent ChatGPT prompts months before the attack, yet the company leadership did not notify police. OpenAI had banned an account linked to Van Rootselaar in June 2025, roughly eight months before the BC shooting, but said the content did not show evidence of an imminent attack, according to AFP. Also read: Mass shooting in Canada's British Columbia: 8, including shooter, killed in school, 2 found dead at home - What we know so far British Columbia mass shooting case: The core allegation against OpenAI OpenAI is facing multiple lawsuits over the shooting, many alleging that its AI models, particularly the popular ChatGPT, did not have enough guardrails to stop answering or encouraging questions to it with intent for murder or suicide. Before the British Colombia lawsuit, the families of seven victims filed their own cases in California three months earlier. Their lawyers said 12 OpenAI employees urged the company to alert police. They alleged that OpenAI stayed silent because "reporting one case would mean reporting thousands", according to the lawsuit. "We will pursue every available avenue to hold OpenAI and its decision-makers accountable," BC Attorney General Sharma said in a statement issued by her office. Also read: Montreal shooter's 104-page manifesto reveals his hate for women and capitalism An apology from OpenAI CEO over the British Columbia shooting In April, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman published an apology letter in the local newspaper, saying he was "deeply sorry that we did not alert law enforcement" about the banned account. The company said it has strengthened its safeguards and maintains a zero-tolerance policy on the use of its tools for violence. It also said that, under guidelines updated after June 2025, the account would have been reported to law enforcement. Also read: Canada school shooter, Jesse Van Rootselaar, killed own mother who once called to end trans hate What comes next in the British Columbia mass shooting case against OpenAI? The province will seek damages, including the cost of building a new school. Jon Festinger of the University of British Columbia (UBC) Peter A. Allard School of Law said it would be a difficult claim, as BC would have to establish a direct causal link between OpenAI's conduct and the tragedy. The government "must be satisfying themselves that there's a sufficient causal chain", the Narcity website cited him as saying. https://www.wionews.com/videos/canada-shooting-at-least-10-dead-in-shootings-at-schools-house-1770788190832/embed British Columbia has pioneered similar litigation in the past. It successfully pursued legal action against tobacco companies, and its opioid lawsuit recently cleared key legal hurdles. The Canadian federal government has pledged C$200 million for a new high school and healthcare upgrades in Tumbler Ridge. A coroner's inquest will examine the deaths, as no criminal trial will take place because the alleged perpetrator is deceased, The Globe and Mail reported.

British Columbia is preparing legal action against OpenAI over the Tumbler Ridge mass shooting. The suit alleges that the AI firm failed to alert police despite ChatGPT prompts linked to the shooter being flagged. This is a landmark case. Here is why

AI and mass murder: Why British Columbia's lawsuit against OpenAI over the Tumbler Ridge shooting matters

OpenAI has proposed to hand over a 5 per cent stake of its company to the US government, reported Financial Times on Thursday, citing two people familiar with the “early conversation”. According to the reports, OpenAI has suggested that other AI companies hand over similar stakes in their firm to the Trump administration. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has argued that the arrangement, would allow the American public to share the financial upside of the AI boom.&nbsp;<h2>What is the proposal?</h2>According to the reports, Sam Altman has urged that &nbsp;AI giants like Google, Meta, and Anthropic cede similar stakes to create a public investment vehicle like the Alaska Permanent Fund, paying annual dividends to citizens of the AI wealth. The discussions were held with President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He has also reportedly discussed with Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders. Though it remains uncertain if other AI giants are willing to participate in the exercise.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/sanae-takaichi-india-visit-post-pacifist-japan-strategy-1782926340658">What is Sanae Takaichi's post-pacifist Japan, and why does India matter?</a><h2>What does it mean for AI giants?</h2>A 5 per cent stake of OpenAI could translate into roughly $42.6 billion, depending on the &nbsp;$852 billion valuation. This could reduce the potential threat and vulnerability of the public, which threatens jobs in many industries, has many wide ranging implication on the environment and national security. Both OpenAI and Anthropic are planning to go public as early as H2 2026.&nbsp;Critics and policy experts have raised serious concerns about OpenAI's proposal, suggesting that it creates a massive conflict of interest as these AI giants are facing backlash over resource allocations like water and land consumption. The US government being part of these companies means it will effectively have to loosen policies to keep these companies profitable while enriching its public fund, which many analysts compare with the cheap purchase of political immunity.&nbsp;

OpenAI has reportedly proposed handing a 5% stake to the US government and urged other AI companies to do the same. The idea is to create a public AI wealth fund that could pay citizens dividends, but critics warn it could create major conflicts of interest.

OpenAI has proposed to hand over a 5 per cent stake of its company to the US government, reported Financial Times on Thursday, citing two people familiar with the “early conversation”. According to the reports, OpenAI has suggested that other AI companies hand over similar stakes in their firm to the Trump administration. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has argued that the arrangement, would allow the American public to share the financial upside of the AI boom. What is the proposal? According to the reports, Sam Altman has urged that AI giants like Google, Meta, and Anthropic cede similar stakes to create a public investment vehicle like the Alaska Permanent Fund, paying annual dividends to citizens of the AI wealth. The discussions were held with President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He has also reportedly discussed with Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders. Though it remains uncertain if other AI giants are willing to participate in the exercise. Also Read: What is Sanae Takaichi's post-pacifist Japan, and why does India matter? What does it mean for AI giants? A 5 per cent stake of OpenAI could translate into roughly $42.6 billion, depending on the $852 billion valuation. This could reduce the potential threat and vulnerability of the public, which threatens jobs in many industries, has many wide ranging implication on the environment and national security. Both OpenAI and Anthropic are planning to go public as early as H2 2026. Critics and policy experts have raised serious concerns about OpenAI's proposal, suggesting that it creates a massive conflict of interest as these AI giants are facing backlash over resource allocations like water and land consumption. The US government being part of these companies means it will effectively have to loosen policies to keep these companies profitable while enriching its public fund, which many analysts compare with the cheap purchase of political immunity.

OpenAI has reportedly proposed handing a 5% stake to the US government and urged other AI companies to do the same. The idea is to create a public AI wealth fund that could pay citizens dividends, but critics warn it could create major conflicts of interest.

OpenAI proposes 5% stake for US government: What Sam Altman's AI wealth fund plan means

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is expected to oppose proposals requiring AI developers to secure US government approval before making new AI models publicly available, according to a company statement released on Wednesday. The move is part of OpenAI's wider push to shape the regulation of future technology. During his visit to Washington this week, Altman will also urge Congress to increase funding for artificial intelligence testing at the US Department of Commerce. The department currently collaborates with firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic to evaluate the capabilities and risks of their AI systems. OpenAI said it wants the federal government to expand these testing efforts and bring in additional experts in areas including cybersecurity, biological threats and national security to strengthen oversight and safety assessments.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-was-anthony-scott-searles-harris-all-we-know-about-bakersfield-bank-hostage-suspect-1780544751122">Who was Anthony Scott Searles-Harris? All we know about Bakersfield bank hostage suspect</a><h3>OpenAI and Anthropic's US IPO</h3>Altman's visit to Washington collides with a crucial period for the company and the industry as OpenAI is preparing to quietly register for an initial public offering. In the other development, OpenAI's competitor Anthropic, which makes Claude, confidentially registered for a US IPO on Monday. The requirements of the federal government might hurt the profits of industry if they slow down the introduction of new models or prompt the companies to change how their products work to solve security concerns. Altman is expected to hold talks with several lawmakers on Wednesday, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican representing Louisiana, according to the Speaker’s office. The White House under President Donald Trump did not immediately respond to requests seeking comment on whether any meetings had been scheduled.

The requirements of the federal government might hurt the profits of industry if they slow down the introduction of new models or prompt the companies to change how their products work to solve security concerns.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is expected to oppose proposals requiring AI developers to secure US government approval before making new AI models publicly available, according to a company statement released on Wednesday. The move is part of OpenAI's wider push to shape the regulation of future technology. During his visit to Washington this week, Altman will also urge Congress to increase funding for artificial intelligence testing at the US Department of Commerce. The department currently collaborates with firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic to evaluate the capabilities and risks of their AI systems. OpenAI said it wants the federal government to expand these testing efforts and bring in additional experts in areas including cybersecurity, biological threats and national security to strengthen oversight and safety assessments. Also read: Who was Anthony Scott Searles-Harris? All we know about Bakersfield bank hostage suspect OpenAI and Anthropic's US IPO Altman's visit to Washington collides with a crucial period for the company and the industry as OpenAI is preparing to quietly register for an initial public offering. In the other development, OpenAI's competitor Anthropic, which makes Claude, confidentially registered for a US IPO on Monday. The requirements of the federal government might hurt the profits of industry if they slow down the introduction of new models or prompt the companies to change how their products work to solve security concerns. Altman is expected to hold talks with several lawmakers on Wednesday, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican representing Louisiana, according to the Speaker’s office. The White House under President Donald Trump did not immediately respond to requests seeking comment on whether any meetings had been scheduled.

The requirements of the federal government might hurt the profits of industry if they slow down the introduction of new models or prompt the companies to change how their products work to solve security concerns.

OpenAI CEO seeks expanded AI testing, rejects pre-release government approval rules

Florida has reportedly filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, raising concerns over alleged risks linked to ChatGPT and generative AI systems.
The legal action focuses on issues including misinformation, user safety, privacy, and potential societal harm from AI tools.


Florida Sues OpenAI Over ChatGPT Risks; State Names Sam Altman in Lawsuit

OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, envisions a future where people will buy intelligence "on a metre", just like any other utility, such as electricity. Speaking at BlackRock in Washington, DC, Altman said that soon, it would become something that consumers and businesses would "plug into" like Wi-Fi or running water. The statement has triggered debate over the future of AI and the people who would control it. “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter," Altman said. His statement and the use of the word "us" paint a scary picture where specific people would be in control of a utility that would be in huge demand. Artificial Intelligence is being pushed across industries globally, with people like Altman, Elon Musk and Jensen Huang strongly advocating for its use.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/delighted-to-be-wrong-sam-altman-says-ai-may-not-trigger-feared-white-collar-job-apocalypse-1779801560534">‘Delighted to be wrong’: Sam Altman says AI may not trigger feared white-collar job apocalypse</a>&nbsp;Experts suggest that AI will soon stop merely being a software and will turn into a utility like electricity or cloud computing. Itwill always be available, constantly run in the background and cost people based on usage. They can tap into a centralised "intelligence grid" and pay for what they use. Altman referenced the old nuclear-energy phrase “too cheap to meter" to indicate that intelligence could be abundant and accessible in the future. He said, "One of the most important things in the future is that we make intelligence, to borrow an old phrase from the energy industry that didn't quite work: 'Too cheap to meter.'"<h2>What is the phrase "too cheap to meter"?</h2>Notably, the phrase "too cheap to meter" was coined in 1954 by Lewis Strauss, the chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Scientists and policymakers once believed that nuclear energy would become so efficient and inexpensive to produce that there would be no need to install meters and charge people for electricity. It would essentially be "free", just like the air we breathe. However, that idea totally collapsed on its face because of the regulatory and safety regulations.&nbsp;<h2>Altman's picture of a civilisation-level change</h2>Meanwhile, Altman is facing flak for his latest statement on AI, not because of yet another push, but for putting a price on real human intelligence and comparing it to electricity. While electricity powers machines, intelligence affects human decision-making and education. Critics argue that treating cognition as a metered corporate service raises questions, such as the control of advanced reasoning being in the hands of a few corporations. This becomes even scarier since the billionaires promoting it, are painting a picture where it will change humanity on a civilisational scale. It is no longer merely a technology, but a force that could alter human lives forever.

Sam Altman wants to sell intelligence "on a metre", and thinks one day it could turn into a utility that people can simply tap into and pay based on the amount of usage, like electricity or water. His words have created panic because of a civilisation-level dynamic.

OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, envisions a future where people will buy intelligence "on a metre", just like any other utility, such as electricity. Speaking at BlackRock in Washington, DC, Altman said that soon, it would become something that consumers and businesses would "plug into" like Wi-Fi or running water. The statement has triggered debate over the future of AI and the people who would control it. “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter," Altman said. His statement and the use of the word "us" paint a scary picture where specific people would be in control of a utility that would be in huge demand. Artificial Intelligence is being pushed across industries globally, with people like Altman, Elon Musk and Jensen Huang strongly advocating for its use. Also Read: ‘Delighted to be wrong’: Sam Altman says AI may not trigger feared white-collar job apocalypse Experts suggest that AI will soon stop merely being a software and will turn into a utility like electricity or cloud computing. Itwill always be available, constantly run in the background and cost people based on usage. They can tap into a centralised "intelligence grid" and pay for what they use. Altman referenced the old nuclear-energy phrase “too cheap to meter" to indicate that intelligence could be abundant and accessible in the future. He said, "One of the most important things in the future is that we make intelligence, to borrow an old phrase from the energy industry that didn't quite work: 'Too cheap to meter.'" What is the phrase "too cheap to meter"? Notably, the phrase "too cheap to meter" was coined in 1954 by Lewis Strauss, the chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Scientists and policymakers once believed that nuclear energy would become so efficient and inexpensive to produce that there would be no need to install meters and charge people for electricity. It would essentially be "free", just like the air we breathe. However, that idea totally collapsed on its face because of the regulatory and safety regulations. Altman's picture of a civilisation-level change Meanwhile, Altman is facing flak for his latest statement on AI, not because of yet another push, but for putting a price on real human intelligence and comparing it to electricity. While electricity powers machines, intelligence affects human decision-making and education. Critics argue that treating cognition as a metered corporate service raises questions, such as the control of advanced reasoning being in the hands of a few corporations. This becomes even scarier since the billionaires promoting it, are painting a picture where it will change humanity on a civilisational scale. It is no longer merely a technology, but a force that could alter human lives forever.

Sam Altman wants to sell intelligence "on a metre", and thinks one day it could turn into a utility that people can simply tap into and pay based on the amount of usage, like electricity or water. His words have created panic because of a civilisation-level dynamic.

Altman paints intelligence as a civilisation-altering commodity sold 'on a metre': Just like 'electricity or Wi-Fi'

Open AI CEO Sam Altman on Tuesday (May 26) said fears of an artificial intelligence-driven jobs collapse may have been overstated, admitting that his earlier predictions about large-scale losses of white-collar jobs have not unfolded as quickly as he once expected.&nbsp;Speaking at a conference organised by the Commonwealth Bank of Australia in Sydney, Altman reflected on how his views on AI’s impact on employment have changed since the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in 2022.&nbsp;“I’m delighted to be wrong about this,” Altman said. “I thought there would have been more impact on entry-level white-collar jobs being eliminated by now than has actually happened."&nbsp;Altman said he had initially believed AI systems would rapidly replace a large number of routine office roles. However, over time, he realised that people continue to value direct human interaction more than many in the technology sector had anticipated.

Sharing a personal example, Altman said he once experimented with using AI to handle replies to Slack and email messages under the tag “this is Sam’s AI.” He later returned to responding to some messages himself.&nbsp;“We really do care about people,” Altman said, adding that software still struggles to fully replicate human connection and communication.&nbsp;According to Altman, AI is more likely to reshape work rather than completely eliminate the need for humans. He said people would continue playing important roles in creativity, communication, judgment, and emotional understanding even as AI systems become more advanced.&nbsp;“I don’t think we’re going to have the kind of jobs apocalypse that some of the companies in our space advocate or talk about,” he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/patients-flee-treatment-as-hospitals-come-under-attack-amid-ebola-outbreak-and-rising-violence-in-dr-congo-1779794524383">Ebola patients flee treatment as hospitals come under attack amid rising violence in DR Congo</a>&nbsp;Altman’s comments mark a softer tone compared with some of his earlier warnings about AI’s effect on employment. In a 2023 interview with The Atlantic, he said “jobs are definitely going to go away” as businesses increasingly adopted AI technologies, though he argued that better jobs would eventually emerge. Last year, he also told a Federal Reserve conference that “entire classes” of jobs could disappear.&nbsp;His latest remarks come at a time when concerns over AI-led restructuring continue to grow across the global technology sector. Major companies have been increasing investments in AI infrastructure while simultaneously cutting jobs.&nbsp;According to layoff tracker TrueUp, more than 144,000 technology workers have lost their jobs globally so far in 2026. Among the biggest workforce reductions this year, Meta announced plans to cut around 8,000 jobs as part of its AI restructuring strategy, with additional layoffs expected later in the year.

Altman’s remarks mark a softer shift from his earlier warnings on AI and employment. He had previously said that jobs would disappear as AI adoption increased and later warned that “entire classes” of jobs could vanish.

Open AI CEO Sam Altman on Tuesday (May 26) said fears of an artificial intelligence-driven jobs collapse may have been overstated, admitting that his earlier predictions about large-scale losses of white-collar jobs have not unfolded as quickly as he once expected. Speaking at a conference organised by the Commonwealth Bank of Australia in Sydney, Altman reflected on how his views on AI’s impact on employment have changed since the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in 2022. “I’m delighted to be wrong about this,” Altman said. “I thought there would have been more impact on entry-level white-collar jobs being eliminated by now than has actually happened." Altman said he had initially believed AI systems would rapidly replace a large number of routine office roles. However, over time, he realised that people continue to value direct human interaction more than many in the technology sector had anticipated.

Altman’s remarks mark a softer shift from his earlier warnings on AI and employment. He had previously said that jobs would disappear as AI adoption increased and later warned that “entire classes” of jobs could vanish.

‘Delighted to be wrong’: Sam Altman says AI may not trigger feared white-collar job apocalypse

The legal battle between Elon Musk and Sam Altman intensified in a U.S. courtroom as Musk’s lawyers accused OpenAI of abandoning its original mission of developing AI for humanity’s benefit. During the proceedings, Musk’s legal team questioned Altman’s credibility, while OpenAI strongly rejected the allegations. The high-profile case has become a major flashpoint in the global debate over artificial intelligence, corporate control, and the future direction of advanced AI systems.


Musk Vs OpenAI: Musk's Lawyer Calls Altman Untrustworthy In Court

Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI, set for a jury trial on April 27, 2026, alleges that the company abandoned its founding mission to develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity in favor of maximizing profits for Microsoft. The lawsuit seeks to remove CEO Sam Altman, reverse the company's for-profit pivot, and return "ill-gotten gains" to the non-profit. 


Elon Musk Takes OpenAI To Court; What The Lawsuit Alleges?

Recently, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was ‘exposed’ as a tech founder with minimal technological skills. But he got company in Steve Jobs, Jack Ma and other tech leaders,  who built major companies through vision, leadership, and strategy despite limited coding or programming expertise

Recently, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was ‘exposed’ as a tech founder with minimal technological skills. But he got company in Steve Jobs, Jack Ma and other tech leaders, &nbsp;who built major companies through vision, leadership, and strategy despite limited coding or programming expertise

Sam Altman's coding abilities are minimal, yet he runs OpenAI. He's not alone. These top tech bosses have limited IT skills

The home of Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, was targeted in a suspected arson attempt after a Molotov cocktail was thrown at his San Francisco residence in the early hours of the morning, authorities have said. No injuries were reported. According to police, the incident occurred at approximately 3:45 am, when the incendiary device struck the property but failed to ignite after bouncing off the house.&nbsp;Law enforcement officials later arrested a 20 year old suspect, identified by the San Francisco Chronicle as Alejandro Daniel Moreno Gama, in connection with the attack.In a statement, the San Francisco Police Department said officers were called roughly an hour after the incident to OpenAI’s headquarters on 3rd Street, where a man allegedly threatened to set fire to the building. Police said the individual matched the description of the suspect linked to the earlier attack and was taken into custody.&nbsp;Following the incident, Altman took to social media platform X to share a personal blog post along with a rare photograph of his family, including his husband Oliver Mulherin and their child. “I wrote this early this morning and I wasn't sure if I would actually publish it, but here it is,” Altman said in his post. “Here is a photo of my family. I love them more than anything."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I wrote this early this morning and I wasn&#39;t sure if I would actually publish it, but here it is:<a href="https://t.co/7Dw9UFpeep">https://t.co/7Dw9UFpeep</a>&mdash; Sam Altman (@sama) <a href="https://twitter.com/sama/status/2042738954550603884?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 10, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Altman, who has largely kept his personal life private, said he chose to share the image in the hope that it might deter further acts of violence. “Images have power, I hope. Normally we try to be pretty private, but in this case I am sharing a photo in the hopes that it might dissuade the next person from throwing a Molotov cocktail at our house, no matter what they think about me,” he wrote.&nbsp;Reflecting on the attack, Altman suggested it may be linked to heightened tensions surrounding the rapid development of artificial intelligence. He referred to a recent critical article about him, saying it had come at a time of “great anxiety about AI” and may have contributed to a more dangerous environment. “Now I am awake in the middle of the night and angry, and thinking that I have underestimated the power of words and narratives,” he wrote.&nbsp;In the remainder of his blog, Altman addressed broader debates within the technology sector, acknowledging that criticism of artificial intelligence is often rooted in legitimate concerns about its impact. “A lot of the criticism of our industry comes from sincere concern about the incredibly high stakes of this technology. This is quite valid, and we welcome good faith criticism and debate,” he said.&nbsp;He added that while he empathises with scepticism towards technology, he believes innovation can ultimately lead to a better future. “While we have that debate, we should de escalate the rhetoric and tactics and try to have fewer explosions in fewer homes, figuratively and literally,” Altman wrote. The incident has raised fresh questions about the personal safety of high-profile technology leaders amid increasingly polarised discussions around the future of artificial intelligence.

Sam Altman shared a rare family photo following a failed Molotov cocktail attack on his home, urging a de-escalation of AI-related rhetoric and prioritising personal safety over heated industry debate.

The home of Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, was targeted in a suspected arson attempt after a Molotov cocktail was thrown at his San Francisco residence in the early hours of the morning, authorities have said. No injuries were reported. According to police, the incident occurred at approximately 3:45 am, when the incendiary device struck the property but failed to ignite after bouncing off the house. Law enforcement officials later arrested a 20 year old suspect, identified by the San Francisco Chronicle as Alejandro Daniel Moreno Gama, in connection with the attack. In a statement, the San Francisco Police Department said officers were called roughly an hour after the incident to OpenAI’s headquarters on 3rd Street, where a man allegedly threatened to set fire to the building. Police said the individual matched the description of the suspect linked to the earlier attack and was taken into custody. Following the incident, Altman took to social media platform X to share a personal blog post along with a rare photograph of his family, including his husband Oliver Mulherin and their child. “I wrote this early this morning and I wasn't sure if I would actually publish it, but here it is,” Altman said in his post. “Here is a photo of my family. I love them more than anything."

Sam Altman shared a rare family photo following a failed Molotov cocktail attack on his home, urging a de-escalation of AI-related rhetoric and prioritising personal safety over heated industry debate.

Sam Altman shares private family photo after 3:45 am Molotov attack on his home. See here

A suspect was arrested after allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, early Friday morning (April 10). The individual also reportedly issued threats near the company’s headquarters in San Francisco. According to the company, no injuries were reported in either incident.&nbsp;&nbsp;A Molotov cocktail is a crude incendiary device typically made using a bottle filled with flammable liquid and a wick that is ignited before being thrown. “Early this morning, someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s home and also made threats at our San Francisco headquarters. Thankfully, no one was hurt,” said Jamie Radice, an OpenAI spokesperson. “The individual is in custody, and we’re assisting law enforcement with their investigation," he added, without giving any further details. Altman has not publicly responded to the incident.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-us-loading-warships-trump-warns-of-renewed-strikes-if-iran-does-not-comply-in-peace-talks-1775840972736">‘US loading warships’: Trump warns of renewed strikes if Iran does not comply in peace talks</a><h2>What the police said</h2>A spokesperson for the San Francisco Police Department said that officers responded to a fire investigation at approximately 4:12 am. They discovered that “that an unknown male subject threw an incendiary destructive device at a home, causing a fire to an exterior gate.” The suspect fled the scene on foot. The device, a hand-thrown incendiary weapon usually made from a glass bottle filled with flammable liquid and a cloth fuse, ignited before being thrown, setting part of an exterior gate on fire before the suspect fled on foot.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-toils-to-avoid-becoming-casualty-of-iran-war-1775838580448/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-toils-to-avoid-becoming-casualty-of-iran-war-1775838580448/embed</a>&nbsp;About an hour later, at 5:07 am, police responded to a separate call near the OpenAI headquarters on the 1400 block of 3rd Street, where a 20-year-old man allegedly threatened to burn down a building. Officers identified the individual as the same suspect from the earlier incident and took him into custody. “When officers arrived on scene, they recognized the male to be the same suspect from the earlier incident and immediately detained him,” said the SFPD.

Man arrested after Molotov cocktail attack at Sam Altman’s home and threats near OpenAI HQ in San Francisco; no injuries reported

A suspect was arrested after allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, early Friday morning (April 10). The individual also reportedly issued threats near the company’s headquarters in San Francisco. According to the company, no injuries were reported in either incident. A Molotov cocktail is a crude incendiary device typically made using a bottle filled with flammable liquid and a wick that is ignited before being thrown. “Early this morning, someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s home and also made threats at our San Francisco headquarters. Thankfully, no one was hurt,” said Jamie Radice, an OpenAI spokesperson. “The individual is in custody, and we’re assisting law enforcement with their investigation," he added, without giving any further details. Altman has not publicly responded to the incident. Also Read: ‘US loading warships’: Trump warns of renewed strikes if Iran does not comply in peace talks What the police said A spokesperson for the San Francisco Police Department said that officers responded to a fire investigation at approximately 4:12 am. They discovered that “that an unknown male subject threw an incendiary destructive device at a home, causing a fire to an exterior gate.” The suspect fled the scene on foot. The device, a hand-thrown incendiary weapon usually made from a glass bottle filled with flammable liquid and a cloth fuse, ignited before being thrown, setting part of an exterior gate on fire before the suspect fled on foot. https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-toils-to-avoid-becoming-casualty-of-iran-war-1775838580448/embed About an hour later, at 5:07 am, police responded to a separate call near the OpenAI headquarters on the 1400 block of 3rd Street, where a 20-year-old man allegedly threatened to burn down a building. Officers identified the individual as the same suspect from the earlier incident and took him into custody. “When officers arrived on scene, they recognized the male to be the same suspect from the earlier incident and immediately detained him,” said the SFPD.

Suspect arrested after Molotov cocktail attack at Sam Altman’s home and threats near OpenAI headquarters in San Francisco; no injuries reported

Molotov cocktail thrown at Open AI's CEO Sam Altman’s home; suspect arrested

Elon Musk recently shared an interview with Robin Farrow, who wrote a 'hit piece' on Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the artificial intelligence firm behind ChatGPT. In the interview, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist behind the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse exposé that sparked the MeToo movement, said that former associates of Altman described him as a sociopath and a pathological liar. Sharing the interview, the X chief, who was part of the founding team of OpenAI, said this man cannot be trusted with a superpowerful AI.&nbsp;<h2>Sam Altman accused of excessive lying</h2>Musk posted the Farrow interview, in which the journalist from The New Yorker highlighted allegations of repeated dishonesty, exaggeration, and misleading statements to board members and partners by Altman. Farrow claimed that Altman was fired from OpenAI in 2023 - before being reinstated - partly for excessive lying. He also spoke about untested AI models being released to India, and false assurances on AI safety provisions, under Altman. While sharing the interview, Musk wrote: "Not someone you want in charge of superpowerful AI."<h2>Farrow's allegations against Sam Altman</h2>Farrow made several allegations in a piece for the New Yorker, titled "Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?". Written by Farrow along with Andrew Marantz and published on 6 April, the article came after 18 months of reporting and investigation. It is based on interviews with more than 100 people, including former and current OpenAI board members, executives, employees, investors, and colleagues. The article also claims to have reviewed previously undisclosed internal documents. This includes the “Ilya memos”, which contain Ilya Sutskever’s Slack messages and HR documents. Also reviewed were the private notes kept by Dario Amodei, the co-founder of rival AI firm Anthropic. Amodei was previously associated with OpenAI.The article questioned whether Altman can be trusted with control over transformative AI technology, in the context that artificial general intelligence (AGI) could be humanity’s most dangerous invention and thus would require a leader of “uncommon integrity” to run a company like OpenAI.<h2>AI, leadership and integrity: Sam Altman is “unconstrained by the truth”</h2>The article seeks to establish a pattern of deception, manipulation, and prioritisation of power and profit over safety commitments in Altman’s conduct. It claims that this pattern has been repeated across his career, from Loopt to Y Combinator and now OpenAI.Altman allegedly drifted from the AI safety mission, pushing aggressively for deals with businesses and governments.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/openai-brings-chatgpt-to-apple-carplay-for-hands-free-voice-interaction-while-driving-1775153637555">OpenAI brings ChatGPT to Apple CarPlay for hands-free voice interaction while driving</a><h2>Sam Altman had a consistent pattern of lying and misrepresentation</h2>In late 2022, Altman told the board that certain controversial features in an upcoming AI model had been approved by OpenAI’s safety panel. After board member Helen Toner asked for documentation, it turned out that the most controversial features had not been approved.Altman told Mira Murati that ChatGPT's GPT-4 Turbo model didn’t need safety approval, citing general counsel Jason Kwon. However, Kwon later said he was “confused” and had no idea where Altman got that idea. In his private notes, running to more than 200 pages, Dario Amodei documented several incidents, including one involving the 2019 Microsoft deal with OpenAI. Amodei wrote that Altman’s words were “almost certainly bulls***t”.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed</a><h2>The betrayal of OpenAI’s nonprofit and safety mission</h2>Some OpenAI founders, including Altman, privately doubted its nonprofit structure early on, according to the report. Greg Brockman wrote in his diary: "If three months later, we’re doing B-corp, then it was a lie."One researcher reportedly told the board: “OpenAI has been going off the rails on its mission... We are prioritising product and revenue above all else.”<h2>Altman's deception and manipulation go back to his first startup</h2>According to the report, employees at his first start-up, Loopt, went to the board twice asking to fire Altman over a lack of transparency and a tendency for exaggeration. This included claiming he was a “Missouri high-school ping-pong champion” when he was not. He inspired loyalty in others but was accused of blurring the truth.During his time at Y Combinator, partners complained of divided loyalties, with Altman making personal investments while serving as president. Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, reportedly told colleagues Altman “had been lying to us all the time”.Altman was later pushed out as president but resisted and remained listed as chairman in SEC filings until 2021, which he said he was unaware of.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/disney-exits-from-openai-deal-here-s-what-happened-1774549684205">Disney exits from OpenAI deal? Here's what happened</a><h2>Sam Altman's aggressive business dealings with questionable partners, and lobbying against regulation</h2>Altman reportedly sought funding and deals with Gulf autocracies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE for massive data-centre projects, despite security red flags. He internally discussed “playing world powers like China and Russia against each other in a bidding war for AI technology, according to the report. This plan was dropped after employee pushback.At one point, he claimed, without evidence, that China had an “AGI Manhattan Project”.Altman lobbied against AI regulation such as the European Union AI Act and bills in California, even as he publicly supported AI safety, said the report.&nbsp;<h2>Sister's abuse accusations and more: Sam Altman's personal character under scanner</h2>Sources cited in Farrow's reportage and interviews described Altman as having a “sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences”, and a desperate need to be liked.The article notes deeply personal allegations from Altman’s sister Annie, including of sexual abuse, which Altman fought in the courts. He denied the allegations. There were unsubstantiated Silicon Valley rumours involving minors, on which no evidence was found by the New Yorker reporters.<h2>Altman's board coup: He was ousted in 2023, but was reinstated, with limited probe</h2>Altman was fired as OpenAI CEO in 2023 by the board, citing a lack of candour. But he quickly returned to the position after organising a counter-campaign. He made Thrive Capital’s $86 billion investment in OpenAI conditional on his return, among other factors. He was reinstated within five days, with the board that ousted him practically disbanded. The subsequent “independent” WilmerHale review, overseen by new board members chosen in consultation with Altman, produced no written report. An 800-word announcement only cited a “breakdown in trust” without explicitly blaming Altman.<h2>‘Can't change my personality’: Altman’s response to allegations on his leadership, personal qualities</h2>Altman attributed the criticism of him to his avoidance of conflict. He said he “can’t change my personality”, and denied lying.He maintained that OpenAI would continue to run safety projects, “or at least safety-adjacent projects”.He also characterised OpenAI's shift to for-profit operations and aggressive deal-making as normal competitive business rather than a betrayal.The New Yorker article does not portray Altman as cartoonishly evil. It presents a complex, high-achieving figure whose traits led to breakdowns in trust. It suggests he exhibits a “reality-distortion field” and ruthless ambition.

Elon Musk has shared a Robin Farrow interview citing allegations against Sam Altman, appearing to agree with the contents of Farrow's New Yorker ‘hit piece’ on the OpenAI CEO. Altman is accused of dishonesty, with the article questioning his leadership amid AI integrity and safety issues.

Elon Musk recently shared an interview with Robin Farrow, who wrote a 'hit piece' on Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the artificial intelligence firm behind ChatGPT. In the interview, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist behind the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse exposé that sparked the MeToo movement, said that former associates of Altman described him as a sociopath and a pathological liar. Sharing the interview, the X chief, who was part of the founding team of OpenAI, said this man cannot be trusted with a superpowerful AI. Sam Altman accused of excessive lying Musk posted the Farrow interview, in which the journalist from The New Yorker highlighted allegations of repeated dishonesty, exaggeration, and misleading statements to board members and partners by Altman. Farrow claimed that Altman was fired from OpenAI in 2023 - before being reinstated - partly for excessive lying. He also spoke about untested AI models being released to India, and false assurances on AI safety provisions, under Altman. While sharing the interview, Musk wrote: "Not someone you want in charge of superpowerful AI." Farrow's allegations against Sam Altman Farrow made several allegations in a piece for the New Yorker, titled "Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?". Written by Farrow along with Andrew Marantz and published on 6 April, the article came after 18 months of reporting and investigation. It is based on interviews with more than 100 people, including former and current OpenAI board members, executives, employees, investors, and colleagues. The article also claims to have reviewed previously undisclosed internal documents. This includes the “Ilya memos”, which contain Ilya Sutskever’s Slack messages and HR documents. Also reviewed were the private notes kept by Dario Amodei, the co-founder of rival AI firm Anthropic. Amodei was previously associated with OpenAI. The article questioned whether Altman can be trusted with control over transformative AI technology, in the context that artificial general intelligence (AGI) could be humanity’s most dangerous invention and thus would require a leader of “uncommon integrity” to run a company like OpenAI. AI, leadership and integrity: Sam Altman is “unconstrained by the truth” The article seeks to establish a pattern of deception, manipulation, and prioritisation of power and profit over safety commitments in Altman’s conduct. It claims that this pattern has been repeated across his career, from Loopt to Y Combinator and now OpenAI. Altman allegedly drifted from the AI safety mission, pushing aggressively for deals with businesses and governments. Also read: OpenAI brings ChatGPT to Apple CarPlay for hands-free voice interaction while driving Sam Altman had a consistent pattern of lying and misrepresentation In late 2022, Altman told the board that certain controversial features in an upcoming AI model had been approved by OpenAI’s safety panel. After board member Helen Toner asked for documentation, it turned out that the most controversial features had not been approved. Altman told Mira Murati that ChatGPT's GPT-4 Turbo model didn’t need safety approval, citing general counsel Jason Kwon. However, Kwon later said he was “confused” and had no idea where Altman got that idea. In his private notes, running to more than 200 pages, Dario Amodei documented several incidents, including one involving the 2019 Microsoft deal with OpenAI. Amodei wrote that Altman’s words were “almost certainly bulls***t”. https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed The betrayal of OpenAI’s nonprofit and safety mission Some OpenAI founders, including Altman, privately doubted its nonprofit structure early on, according to the report. Greg Brockman wrote in his diary: "If three months later, we’re doing B-corp, then it was a lie." One researcher reportedly told the board: “OpenAI has been going off the rails on its mission... We are prioritising product and revenue above all else.” Altman's deception and manipulation go back to his first startup According to the report, employees at his first start-up, Loopt, went to the board twice asking to fire Altman over a lack of transparency and a tendency for exaggeration. This included claiming he was a “Missouri high-school ping-pong champion” when he was not. He inspired loyalty in others but was accused of blurring the truth. During his time at Y Combinator, partners complained of divided loyalties, with Altman making personal investments while serving as president. Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, reportedly told colleagues Altman “had been lying to us all the time”. Altman was later pushed out as president but resisted and remained listed as chairman in SEC filings until 2021, which he said he was unaware of. Also read: Disney exits from OpenAI deal? Here's what happened Sam Altman's aggressive business dealings with questionable partners, and lobbying against regulation Altman reportedly sought funding and deals with Gulf autocracies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE for massive data-centre projects, despite security red flags. He internally discussed “playing world powers like China and Russia against each other in a bidding war for AI technology, according to the report. This plan was dropped after employee pushback. At one point, he claimed, without evidence, that China had an “AGI Manhattan Project”. Altman lobbied against AI regulation such as the European Union AI Act and bills in California, even as he publicly supported AI safety, said the report. Sister's abuse accusations and more: Sam Altman's personal character under scanner Sources cited in Farrow's reportage and interviews described Altman as having a “sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences”, and a desperate need to be liked. The article notes deeply personal allegations from Altman’s sister Annie, including of sexual abuse, which Altman fought in the courts. He denied the allegations. There were unsubstantiated Silicon Valley rumours involving minors, on which no evidence was found by the New Yorker reporters. Altman's board coup: He was ousted in 2023, but was reinstated, with limited probe Altman was fired as OpenAI CEO in 2023 by the board, citing a lack of candour. But he quickly returned to the position after organising a counter-campaign. He made Thrive Capital’s $86 billion investment in OpenAI conditional on his return, among other factors. He was reinstated within five days, with the board that ousted him practically disbanded. The subsequent “independent” WilmerHale review, overseen by new board members chosen in consultation with Altman, produced no written report. An 800-word announcement only cited a “breakdown in trust” without explicitly blaming Altman. ‘Can't change my personality’: Altman’s response to allegations on his leadership, personal qualities Altman attributed the criticism of him to his avoidance of conflict. He said he “can’t change my personality”, and denied lying. He maintained that OpenAI would continue to run safety projects, “or at least safety-adjacent projects”. He also characterised OpenAI's shift to for-profit operations and aggressive deal-making as normal competitive business rather than a betrayal. The New Yorker article does not portray Altman as cartoonishly evil. It presents a complex, high-achieving figure whose traits led to breakdowns in trust. It suggests he exhibits a “reality-distortion field” and ruthless ambition.

Elon Musk has shared a Robin Farrow interview citing allegations against Sam Altman, appearing to agree with the contents of Farrow's New Yorker ‘hit piece’ on the OpenAI CEO. Altman is accused of dishonesty, with the article questioning his leadership amid AI integrity and safety issues.

Sam Altman a sociopath, pathological liar and abuser? Musk agrees to claims on OpenAI chief's past and leadership

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, shared a post on X about a man who used ChatGPT, to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol to treat his dog. Altman described the meeting as one of the most interesting conversations he had that week. According to Altman, the man behind the effort, Paul Conyngham, used AI tools alongside human expertise to create a treatment protocol aimed at saving his dog named Rosie.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The coolest meeting I had this week with was Paul, who used ChatGPT and other LLMs to create an mRNA vaccine protocol to save his dog Rosie. It is amazing story. &quot;The chat bots empowered me as an individual to act with the power of a research institute - planning, education,… <a href="https://t.co/akgD2Wz7d0">https://t.co/akgD2Wz7d0</a>&mdash; Sam Altman (@sama) <a href="https://twitter.com/sama/status/2037396826060673188?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>How AI helped design the vaccine protocol</h2>In a post shared on X, Conyngham explained that AI tools played a major role in planning the process.He said chatbots helped him perform tasks that would normally require a large research team. These included analysing genomic information, exploring treatment options and designing a potential vaccine protocol.“The chatbots empowered me as an individual to act with the power of a research institute,” he wrote.According to his description, AI assisted with:Planning research stepsLearning scientific conceptsTroubleshooting problemsChecking regulatory considerationsConverting genomic data into a vaccine designHowever, he stressed that human experts were involved throughout the process.“The combination of AI and human collaboration is what made it possible,” he said.<h2>What is an mRNA vaccine?</h2>An mRNA vaccine works by using messenger RNA to instruct cells to produce a specific protein. The immune system then learns to recognise that protein and builds protection against the related disease.The technology became widely known during the COVID-19 pandemic, when pharmaceutical companies used it to develop vaccines rapidly. Researchers say mRNA platforms are flexible because they can be designed using genetic information. This makes them a potential tool for personalised medicine in the future.In this case, the vaccine protocol was reportedly designed based on genomic data related to the disease affecting the dog.<h2>Sam Altman reacts to the story</h2>Altman said the meeting made him think about the broader possibilities of AI-assisted scientific work.“The coolest meeting I had this week was with Paul,” he wrote in a post on X.He noted that AI tools allowed one individual to plan research steps that might normally require a larger institutional effort.Altman added that the story raised an interesting idea that similar approaches could eventually become the foundation for new companies focused on AI-assisted biomedical development.However, he also acknowledged that turning such projects into scalable systems would still be complex.<h2>AI and the future of scientific research</h2>The example highlights how artificial intelligence is gradually entering areas traditionally limited to specialised laboratories. AI models can analyse scientific papers, interpret genomic information and generate hypotheses for researchers to examine.Still, experts caution that AI-generated medical ideas must always be reviewed by trained professionals. Medical treatments require extensive testing, regulatory approval and safety verification. The case shared by Altman shows how AI tools may support individuals and researchers, but they do not replace human expertise.<h2>A glimpse into AI-assisted discovery</h2>The story of Rosie the dog reflects a broader shift in technology. Artificial intelligence is moving beyond conversation tools and becoming a research assistant. For individuals with technical knowledge, AI can help organise information, accelerate learning and explore complex scientific problems.While such projects remain rare, they suggest a possible future where AI supports scientific experimentation in new ways. As AI models continue improving, collaborations between machines and human experts may play a larger role in research, medicine and biotechnology.

Sam Altman shared a story about Paul Conyngham on X, who used ChatGPT and other AI tools to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol for his dog, Rosie. By analysing genomic data and planning research steps with AI, Conyngham created a treatment concept with support from human experts.

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, shared a post on X about a man who used ChatGPT, to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol to treat his dog. Altman described the meeting as one of the most interesting conversations he had that week. According to Altman, the man behind the effort, Paul Conyngham, used AI tools alongside human expertise to create a treatment protocol aimed at saving his dog named Rosie.

Sam Altman shared a story about Paul Conyngham on X, who used ChatGPT and other AI tools to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol for his dog, Rosie. By analysing genomic data and planning research steps with AI, Conyngham created a treatment concept with support from human experts.

Man uses ChatGPT to help design an mRNA vaccine to save his dog; OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reacts

Artificial intelligence could soon become a basic service similar to electricity or water, according to Sam Altman, the chief executive of OpenAI. Speaking at the BlackRock US Infrastructure Summit in Washington DC, Altman said future users may pay for AI based on how much they use it, much like electricity consumption.In his view, artificial intelligence could gradually shift from being seen as a complex technology to becoming a simple everyday service.“We see a future where intelligence is a utility like electricity or water and people buy it from us on a meter,” Altman said during the event.<h2>AI could become a metered service</h2>Altman suggested that instead of paying a fixed monthly subscription, users might eventually pay for AI based on usage.This model would work similarly to electricity or water billing. The more computing power a person or company consumes, the more they pay.Such a model would allow businesses and individuals to access powerful AI tools without committing to expensive long-term plans.Many technology companies already follow a similar approach in cloud computing services, where customers pay based on processing power or data usage.

<h2>AI already transforming workplaces</h2>According to Altman, AI systems are rapidly changing how work gets done in several industries.One of the clearest examples is software development. AI tools can now generate code and complete tasks that might take human engineers several hours.But coding is only one part of the transformation.<h2>AI is also being used for:</h2>Scientific researchData analysisBusiness planningWriting and documentationCustomer service automation

In companies, employees are spending less time performing technical tasks and more time guiding AI systems that carry out the work. Altman said this trend could expand further as AI models become more capable. AI may soon handle longer and more complex projectsAt present, many AI systems can complete tasks that normally take a few hours.However, Altman expects these systems to soon handle projects that take several days or even weeks.This shift would allow AI tools to manage more complex workflows, from research and planning to coding and product development.Altman also said he personally uses AI frequently while working at OpenAI. When he develops new product ideas or business strategies, he often asks AI systems for feedback before discussing them with colleagues.<h2>The infrastructure behind AI</h2>Although the future may look simple for users, the technology behind AI requires enormous infrastructure.Large AI models run in massive data centres filled with specialised hardware such as GPUs. These facilities consume significant amounts of electricity and require complex cooling and maintenance systems.Altman described them as large campuses where thousands of workers help build and maintain computing infrastructure.To support growing demand, OpenAI has been expanding partnerships with companies including Nvidia, Amazon, and SoftBank.These partnerships help provide the computing power needed to train and run advanced AI models.<h2>Making AI widely accessible</h2>Altman said the long-term goal is to make AI available to as many people as possible.If AI becomes as common as electricity, people may stop thinking about the technology itself. Instead, they will simply use it whenever they need help writing, analysing information, solving problems or building products.For Altman, this shift could mark the next stage of the AI industry where intelligence becomes a widely available service rather than a specialised tool.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said artificial intelligence could eventually become a basic utility similar to electricity or water. Speaking at the BlackRock US Infrastructure Summit, Altman suggested future users may pay for AI based on usage, rather than fixed subscriptions. 

Artificial intelligence could soon become a basic service similar to electricity or water, according to Sam Altman, the chief executive of OpenAI. Speaking at the BlackRock US Infrastructure Summit in Washington DC, Altman said future users may pay for AI based on how much they use it, much like electricity consumption. In his view, artificial intelligence could gradually shift from being seen as a complex technology to becoming a simple everyday service. “We see a future where intelligence is a utility like electricity or water and people buy it from us on a meter,” Altman said during the event. AI could become a metered service Altman suggested that instead of paying a fixed monthly subscription, users might eventually pay for AI based on usage. This model would work similarly to electricity or water billing. The more computing power a person or company consumes, the more they pay. Such a model would allow businesses and individuals to access powerful AI tools without committing to expensive long-term plans. Many technology companies already follow a similar approach in cloud computing services, where customers pay based on processing power or data usage.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said artificial intelligence could eventually become a basic utility similar to electricity or water. Speaking at the BlackRock US Infrastructure Summit, Altman suggested future users may pay for AI based on usage, rather than fixed subscriptions.&nbsp;

AI could become a utility like electricity, says OpenAI CEO Sam Altman

After Pentagon moved to designate the artificial intelligence company Anthropic a national security risk and the US President Donald Trump asked its government to stop using the artificial intelligence company Anthropic's products, Sam Altman said Friday that his company OpenAI has struck a deal with the Pentagon to use its models in the defense agency's classified network, using "technical safeguards."&nbsp;Making the announcement, Altman taking to X wrote, "Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network."&nbsp;He also spoke on the safety measure his company will take to deploy their models in Pantagons classified network.&nbsp;"In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome," wrote Altman and added, "We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.<h2>Anthropic Reacts</h2>&nbsp;Earlier today, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth shared on X that he is directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk.&nbsp;Reactiong to the decision, the company wrote, “We are deeply saddened by these developments. As the first frontier AI company to deploy models in the US government’s classified networks, Anthropic has supported American warfighters since June 2024 and has every intention of continuing to do so.”&nbsp;

After striking the deal Altman spoke on the safety measure his company will take to deploy their models in Pantagons classified network.

After Pentagon moved to designate the artificial intelligence company Anthropic a national security risk and the US President Donald Trump asked its government to stop using the artificial intelligence company Anthropic's products, Sam Altman said Friday that his company OpenAI has struck a deal with the Pentagon to use its models in the defense agency's classified network, using "technical safeguards." Making the announcement, Altman taking to X wrote, "Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network." He also spoke on the safety measure his company will take to deploy their models in Pantagons classified network. "In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome," wrote Altman and added, "We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only. Anthropic Reacts Earlier today, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth shared on X that he is directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk. Reactiong to the decision, the company wrote, “We are deeply saddened by these developments. As the first frontier AI company to deploy models in the US government’s classified networks, Anthropic has supported American warfighters since June 2024 and has every intention of continuing to do so.”

After striking the deal Altman spoke on the safety measure his company will take to deploy their models in Pantagons classified network.

Altman reaches agreement with Pentagon on deploying OpenAI models for classified work

A brief onstage moment between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei drew attention during the India AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi.&nbsp;During a group photograph with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other global technology leaders, several attendees were seen holding hands and raising them for the cameras. However, social media users quickly noticed that Altman and Amodei did not hold hands. Instead, both raised their fists separately, maintaining distance between them.&nbsp;The moment soon went viral, with many online speculating about tensions between the two AI leaders.&nbsp;Prime Minister Narendra Modi stood at the centre of the photograph. Google CEO Sundar Pichai stood on his right, while Altman stood on his left. Amodei was positioned next to Altman.&nbsp;<h2>Sam Altman Responds: ‘I Was Confused’</h2>Hours after the image spread online, Sam Altman said about the incident during a closed-door interaction with few reporters.&nbsp;“I was sort of confused and didn’t know what I was supposed to do,” Altman said. He explained that Prime Minister Modi had taken his hand and raised it, but he was unsure about the intended gesture for the photograph.&nbsp;Altman added, “Modi grabbed my hand and put it up, and I wasn’t sure what we were supposed to be doing.”&nbsp;As of now there was no comment from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on the incident.&nbsp;<h2>OpenAI and Anthropic Rivalry</h2>Sam Altman, 40, and Dario Amodei, 43, previously worked together at OpenAI until 2019. According to earlier reports, Amodei left OpenAI in 2020 along with several senior researchers following disagreements over the company’s direction. He later co-founded Anthropic with his sister Daniela Amodei.&nbsp;In 2023, when OpenAI’s board temporarily removed Altman as CEO, reports suggested that Amodei was approached as a possible replacement. He declined the offer. Altman was reinstated as CEO within days.&nbsp;Today, OpenAI and Anthropic are among the leading artificial intelligence firms globally. According to Bloomberg estimates cited in reports, OpenAI is valued at around $500 billion, while Anthropic is valued at approximately $380 billion.&nbsp;The rivalry has also played out publicly. Anthropic recently aired a high-profile Super Bowl advertisement that criticised the idea of intrusive AI advertising. The ad suggested that some AI companies might insert advertisements directly into chatbot responses.&nbsp;In response, Altman posted on X that he “laughed” at the ad but described it as “clearly dishonest.” He said OpenAI’s principle was not to insert ads directly into chatbot responses. He also claimed that “more Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US.”&nbsp;<h2>India AI Impact Summit them brought together</h2>The India AI Impact Summit 2026 brought together global AI leaders, policymakers and industry executives to discuss artificial intelligence governance, infrastructure and innovation. With OpenAI and Anthropic both expanding globally, including in India, public appearances of their CEOs attract close attention.&nbsp;While the viral moment sparked speculation online, Altman’s clarification suggests there was no deliberate snub, but rather uncertainty during a coordinated stage gesture.&nbsp;&nbsp;

A viral moment at the India AI Impact Summit showed Sam Altman and Dario Amodei not holding hands during a group photo with PM Modi. Altman later said he was “confused” about the gesture. The clip sparked speculation amid OpenAI-Anthropic rivalry.


A brief onstage moment between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei drew attention during the India AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi. During a group photograph with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other global technology leaders, several attendees were seen holding hands and raising them for the cameras. However, social media users quickly noticed that Altman and Amodei did not hold hands. Instead, both raised their fists separately, maintaining distance between them. The moment soon went viral, with many online speculating about tensions between the two AI leaders. Prime Minister Narendra Modi stood at the centre of the photograph. Google CEO Sundar Pichai stood on his right, while Altman stood on his left. Amodei was positioned next to Altman. Sam Altman Responds: ‘I Was Confused’ Hours after the image spread online, Sam Altman said about the incident during a closed-door interaction with few reporters. “I was sort of confused and didn’t know what I was supposed to do,” Altman said. He explained that Prime Minister Modi had taken his hand and raised it, but he was unsure about the intended gesture for the photograph. Altman added, “Modi grabbed my hand and put it up, and I wasn’t sure what we were supposed to be doing.” As of now there was no comment from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on the incident. OpenAI and Anthropic Rivalry Sam Altman, 40, and Dario Amodei, 43, previously worked together at OpenAI until 2019. According to earlier reports, Amodei left OpenAI in 2020 along with several senior researchers following disagreements over the company’s direction. He later co-founded Anthropic with his sister Daniela Amodei. In 2023, when OpenAI’s board temporarily removed Altman as CEO, reports suggested that Amodei was approached as a possible replacement. He declined the offer. Altman was reinstated as CEO within days. Today, OpenAI and Anthropic are among the leading artificial intelligence firms globally. According to Bloomberg estimates cited in reports, OpenAI is valued at around $500 billion, while Anthropic is valued at approximately $380 billion. The rivalry has also played out publicly. Anthropic recently aired a high-profile Super Bowl advertisement that criticised the idea of intrusive AI advertising. The ad suggested that some AI companies might insert advertisements directly into chatbot responses. In response, Altman posted on X that he “laughed” at the ad but described it as “clearly dishonest.” He said OpenAI’s principle was not to insert ads directly into chatbot responses. He also claimed that “more Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US.” India AI Impact Summit them brought together The India AI Impact Summit 2026 brought together global AI leaders, policymakers and industry executives to discuss artificial intelligence governance, infrastructure and innovation. With OpenAI and Anthropic both expanding globally, including in India, public appearances of their CEOs attract close attention. While the viral moment sparked speculation online, Altman’s clarification suggests there was no deliberate snub, but rather uncertainty during a coordinated stage gesture.

A viral moment at the India AI Impact Summit showed Sam Altman and Dario Amodei not holding hands during a group photo with PM Modi. Altman later said he was “confused” about the gesture. The clip sparked speculation amid OpenAI-Anthropic rivalry.

'Didn't know what was happening': Here’s what Sam Altman said on his awkward exchange with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei

India has emerged as one of the biggest markets for ChatGPT, with 100 million weekly active users, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman said ahead of a major government-led AI summit in New Delhi.Altman shared the figure in an article published in The Times of India on Sunday, just a day before the five-day India AI Impact Summit begins in the capital.<h2>India is now ChatGPT’s second-largest user base</h2>India is now ChatGPT’s second-largest market globally. The milestone highlights how quickly AI tools are being adopted in the country, driven by a young population and widespread internet access.Globally, ChatGPT had crossed 800 million weekly active users by October 2025 and is reported to be nearing 900 million. India’s share of that growth is becoming increasingly important to OpenAI’s long-term strategy.<h2>Students are driving ChatGPT’s growth in India</h2>He noted that India has the largest number of student users of ChatGPT worldwide. Students are using the tool for learning, exam preparation, coding help and research support.India has also become a key focus for other AI companies targeting education. Rivals are offering free or discounted AI plans to students, underlining how classrooms and learning platforms are becoming a major battleground for AI adoption.<h2>How OpenAI is adapting for India</h2>To support growth in a price-sensitive market, OpenAI has adjusted its offerings in India. The company opened its New Delhi office in August 2025 and launched a sub-$5 ChatGPT Go plan, which was later made free for a year for Indian users.Altman said OpenAI’s focus in India is on three areas:Access, so AI tools are available regardless of income or educationAdoption, by integrating AI into schools, clinics and small businessesAgency, by helping users build confidence and skills to use AI effectivelyHe added that India’s scale gives it a chance to shape how “democratic AI” is adopted in emerging markets.<h2>Challenges&nbsp;</h2>Despite strong adoption, Altman pointed out that turning widespread usage into long-term economic value remains a challenge. Infrastructure limits and affordability concerns make large-scale deployment harder than in developed markets.Indian government programmes such as the IndiaAI Mission aim to address these gaps by expanding computing capacity, supporting startups and using AI in public services like healthcare and agriculture.He also warned that uneven access could concentrate AI’s benefits among a small group, reducing its wider impact.<h2>More partnerships expected</h2>He said OpenAI plans to deepen its engagement with the Indian government and is expected to announce new partnerships focused on expanding AI access across the country. Details have not yet been shared.The India AI Impact Summit is expected to host global technology leaders, policymakers and business figures, underlining India’s growing influence in shaping the future of artificial intelligence.For OpenAI and its peers, India’s 100 million weekly ChatGPT users show that the country is no longer just a growth market, but a key player in the global AI conversation.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said India now has 100 million weekly ChatGPT users, making it the platform’s second-largest market globally, driven largely by students and rapid AI adoption ahead of the India AI Impact Summit.


India has emerged as one of the biggest markets for ChatGPT, with 100 million weekly active users, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman said ahead of a major government-led AI summit in New Delhi. Altman shared the figure in an article published in The Times of India on Sunday, just a day before the five-day India AI Impact Summit begins in the capital. India is now ChatGPT’s second-largest user base India is now ChatGPT’s second-largest market globally. The milestone highlights how quickly AI tools are being adopted in the country, driven by a young population and widespread internet access. Globally, ChatGPT had crossed 800 million weekly active users by October 2025 and is reported to be nearing 900 million. India’s share of that growth is becoming increasingly important to OpenAI’s long-term strategy. Students are driving ChatGPT’s growth in India He noted that India has the largest number of student users of ChatGPT worldwide. Students are using the tool for learning, exam preparation, coding help and research support. India has also become a key focus for other AI companies targeting education. Rivals are offering free or discounted AI plans to students, underlining how classrooms and learning platforms are becoming a major battleground for AI adoption. How OpenAI is adapting for India To support growth in a price-sensitive market, OpenAI has adjusted its offerings in India. The company opened its New Delhi office in August 2025 and launched a sub-$5 ChatGPT Go plan, which was later made free for a year for Indian users. Altman said OpenAI’s focus in India is on three areas: Access, so AI tools are available regardless of income or education Adoption, by integrating AI into schools, clinics and small businesses Agency, by helping users build confidence and skills to use AI effectively He added that India’s scale gives it a chance to shape how “democratic AI” is adopted in emerging markets. Challenges Despite strong adoption, Altman pointed out that turning widespread usage into long-term economic value remains a challenge. Infrastructure limits and affordability concerns make large-scale deployment harder than in developed markets. Indian government programmes such as the IndiaAI Mission aim to address these gaps by expanding computing capacity, supporting startups and using AI in public services like healthcare and agriculture. He also warned that uneven access could concentrate AI’s benefits among a small group, reducing its wider impact. More partnerships expected He said OpenAI plans to deepen its engagement with the Indian government and is expected to announce new partnerships focused on expanding AI access across the country. Details have not yet been shared. The India AI Impact Summit is expected to host global technology leaders, policymakers and business figures, underlining India’s growing influence in shaping the future of artificial intelligence. For OpenAI and its peers, India’s 100 million weekly ChatGPT users show that the country is no longer just a growth market, but a key player in the global AI conversation.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said India now has 100 million weekly ChatGPT users, making it the platform’s second-largest market globally, driven largely by students and rapid AI adoption.

India has 100M weekly active ChatGPT users, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says

OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has said that India has the potential to become a “full-stack AI leader”, as the country prepares to host the Global AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi.Speaking ahead of the summit, Altman said India now ranks as OpenAI’s second-largest user base globally, behind only the United States. His comments come as India positions itself as a major hub for artificial intelligence development, adoption and governance.&nbsp;<h2>Sam Altman sees India as a full-stack AI leader</h2>According to Altman, India has all the key elements needed to build and scale artificial intelligence across the entire value chain. This includes talent, policy support, infrastructure and a large user base.He said India is not only using AI tools but is also capable of building them. “India has the ingredients homegrown tech talent, a clear national strategy and strong optimism about what AI can do,” Altman said, as reported by ANI.India’s growing digital economy and its focus on public-interest technology have also helped accelerate AI adoption across sectors such as healthcare, education and agriculture.<h2>India’s growing importance for OpenAI</h2>Altman said India has emerged as one of OpenAI’s most important markets. He noted that India now has around 100 million weekly active users on OpenAI platforms, making it the company’s second-largest market by usage.He also highlighted that India has the largest number of students using ChatGPT worldwide and ranks fourth globally in the adoption of Prism, OpenAI’s free tool for scientific research and collaboration.OpenAI opened its first office in New Delhi last year and plans to expand its presence further. Altman said the company is also exploring deeper partnerships with the Indian government to widen access to AI tools.<h2>Focus on access, adoption and skills</h2>Altman outlined three areas that he believes are crucial for AI to drive growth in India.First is access, ensuring that AI tools are available to people regardless of income, education or technical background. Second is adoption, where AI must be integrated into schools, clinics, small businesses and public services. The third is agency, which focuses on building AI literacy so people can confidently use these tools for decision-making and problem-solving.He warned of a “capability gap”, where access to AI exists but the skills to use it effectively remain limited to a small group. According to him, large-scale AI literacy programmes will be critical to close this gap.<h2>India’s AI push and what comes next</h2>India’s government has been promoting a full-stack AI approach through its national AI mission, which aims to expand computing capacity, support startups and develop multilingual AI applications for public services.The Global AI Impact Summit 2026, scheduled to be held at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, is expected to bring together global leaders, policymakers and technology firms to discuss inclusive and responsible AI growth.Altman said AI will play a key role in shaping India’s future and that India, in turn, will help shape the future of artificial intelligence globally.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says India can become a “full-stack AI leader”, citing talent, policy support and scale. India is now OpenAI’s second-largest market as it prepares to host the Global AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi.

OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has said that India has the potential to become a “full-stack AI leader”, as the country prepares to host the Global AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi. Speaking ahead of the summit, Altman said India now ranks as OpenAI’s second-largest user base globally, behind only the United States. His comments come as India positions itself as a major hub for artificial intelligence development, adoption and governance. Sam Altman sees India as a full-stack AI leader According to Altman, India has all the key elements needed to build and scale artificial intelligence across the entire value chain. This includes talent, policy support, infrastructure and a large user base. He said India is not only using AI tools but is also capable of building them. “India has the ingredients homegrown tech talent, a clear national strategy and strong optimism about what AI can do,” Altman said, as reported by ANI. India’s growing digital economy and its focus on public-interest technology have also helped accelerate AI adoption across sectors such as healthcare, education and agriculture. India’s growing importance for OpenAI Altman said India has emerged as one of OpenAI’s most important markets. He noted that India now has around 100 million weekly active users on OpenAI platforms, making it the company’s second-largest market by usage. He also highlighted that India has the largest number of students using ChatGPT worldwide and ranks fourth globally in the adoption of Prism, OpenAI’s free tool for scientific research and collaboration. OpenAI opened its first office in New Delhi last year and plans to expand its presence further. Altman said the company is also exploring deeper partnerships with the Indian government to widen access to AI tools. Focus on access, adoption and skills Altman outlined three areas that he believes are crucial for AI to drive growth in India. First is access, ensuring that AI tools are available to people regardless of income, education or technical background. Second is adoption, where AI must be integrated into schools, clinics, small businesses and public services. The third is agency, which focuses on building AI literacy so people can confidently use these tools for decision-making and problem-solving. He warned of a “capability gap”, where access to AI exists but the skills to use it effectively remain limited to a small group. According to him, large-scale AI literacy programmes will be critical to close this gap. India’s AI push and what comes next India’s government has been promoting a full-stack AI approach through its national AI mission, which aims to expand computing capacity, support startups and develop multilingual AI applications for public services. The Global AI Impact Summit 2026, scheduled to be held at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, is expected to bring together global leaders, policymakers and technology firms to discuss inclusive and responsible AI growth. Altman said AI will play a key role in shaping India’s future and that India, in turn, will help shape the future of artificial intelligence globally.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says India can become a “full-stack AI leader”, citing talent, policy support and scale. India is now OpenAI’s second-largest market as it prepares to host the Global AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi.

OpenAI CEO believes India can become a full-stack AI leader

sam-altman

Sam Altman, News on Sam Altman, stories on Sam Altman, articles on Sam Altman, Sam Altman stories at Wion, Sam Altman news, Sam Altman latest news

sam altman

Sam Altman says AI should do more than cure cancer: Here's what he wants instead

‘The people deserve their RAM too’: Elon Musk mocks Sam Altman’s memory comments

Sam Altman says personal computers should not hold DRAM ‘used 5% of the time’

Sam Altman warns AI can now find bugs unexpectedly 'outside normal threat model'

OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs summoned by Australia’s Senate amid AI probe

'Extreme care': Altman, Amodei urge caution over 'rapid AI development' at UNSC

AI Doomsday: Sam Altman to brief UN security council on AI

OpenAI boss Sam Altman repeats AI 'slow down' call, says 'world should trust us'

Artificial trailer: Andrew Garfield plays Sam Altman in Luca Guadagnino’s drama

ChatGPT water use is less than you think, says Sam Altman

Sam Altman falsely declared dead on Wikipedia, Google briefly picks up fake edit

What is AI singularity? Sam Altman says the world has already entered it

Florida Pastor Sues Openai over allegedly harmful Chatgpt medical advice

Florida Pastor Sues Openai over allegedly harmful Chatgpt medical advice

AI and mass murder: Why British Columbia lawsuit against OpenAI matters

OpenAI proposes 5% stake for US government: What Altman's AI wealth fund means

OpenAI CEO seeks expanded AI testing, rejects pre-release govt approval rules

Florida Sues OpenAI Over ChatGPT Risks; State Names Sam Altman in Lawsuit

Altman paints intelligence as a civilisation-altering commodity

‘Delighted to be wrong’: Sam Altman says feared AI job apocalypse may not happen

Musk Vs OpenAI: Musk's Lawyer Calls Altman Untrustworthy In Court

Elon Musk Takes OpenAI To Court; What The Lawsuit Alleges?

Tech bosses without IT skills: Sam Altman is one of them, but he's not alone

Sam Altman shares private family photo after 3:45 am Molotov attack on his home