NATO, or The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, is also seen written with the letters switched backwards - OTAN. While it might look like NATO has simply been written as OTAN for some diplomatic or official reason, that is not the case. NATO is an intergovernmental transnational military alliance that came into existence on 4 April 1949. It has 32 member states—30 European and 2 North American-and the defence bloc works for the collective security of all nations that are a part of the alliance. Its main aim was to create a safe environment during the Cold War and defend countries against the threat posed by the Soviet Union. However, it continues to remain active long after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.NATO-OTAN are not letters merely arranged backwards. While NATO stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organization, OTAN is the abbreviation of its French name - Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord.&nbsp;<h2>Why does NATO have a French name?</h2>The reason for having a French name also for NATO is that France was one of the original twelve founding members of NATO in 1949. Also, the bloc has two official languages - English and French. So the defence bloc's name is written both in English and French. Besides, French has held a prominent place as a language in international diplomacy.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-the-daddy-thing-i-didn-t-embarrassed-nato-chief-rutte-backtracks-on-calling-trump-daddy-1750917489349">'The daddy thing, I didn't...': Embarrassed NATO chief Rutte does an about-turn on Trump 'daddy' remark</a>&nbsp;Having started with 12 members, NATO has grown over the years, with new members being added ten times. Sweden was the most recent addition, having joined the alliance on 7 March 2024. There are four aspiring members: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, and Ukraine. Kyiv has been vying to become a member of NATO for years now. It urged to hasten its application after Russia attacked Ukraine in February 2022. NATO's expansion has become a reason for increasing tensions with countries like Russia.The bloc doesn't meet every year but only when new policies or new member nations are set to be introduced. To date, 34 NATO summits have happened. The most recent one was held in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 24 and 25. In this edition, it was decided to increase defence spending by each country. According to the new language, "allies commit to invest 5 per cent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035." Most of the member nations agreed, while Spain said it would only invest two per cent.&nbsp;

NATO is also written as OTAN. It looks like the letters are reversed for some official reason, but that's not the case. Here is why the official sign carries both the words NATO and OTAN.

NATO, or The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, is also seen written with the letters switched backwards - OTAN. While it might look like NATO has simply been written as OTAN for some diplomatic or official reason, that is not the case. NATO is an intergovernmental transnational military alliance that came into existence on 4 April 1949. It has 32 member states—30 European and 2 North American-and the defence bloc works for the collective security of all nations that are a part of the alliance. Its main aim was to create a safe environment during the Cold War and defend countries against the threat posed by the Soviet Union. However, it continues to remain active long after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. NATO-OTAN are not letters merely arranged backwards. While NATO stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organization, OTAN is the abbreviation of its French name - Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord. Why does NATO have a French name? The reason for having a French name also for NATO is that France was one of the original twelve founding members of NATO in 1949. Also, the bloc has two official languages - English and French. So the defence bloc's name is written both in English and French. Besides, French has held a prominent place as a language in international diplomacy. Also Read: 'The daddy thing, I didn't...': Embarrassed NATO chief Rutte does an about-turn on Trump 'daddy' remark Having started with 12 members, NATO has grown over the years, with new members being added ten times. Sweden was the most recent addition, having joined the alliance on 7 March 2024. There are four aspiring members: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, and Ukraine. Kyiv has been vying to become a member of NATO for years now. It urged to hasten its application after Russia attacked Ukraine in February 2022. NATO's expansion has become a reason for increasing tensions with countries like Russia. The bloc doesn't meet every year but only when new policies or new member nations are set to be introduced. To date, 34 NATO summits have happened. The most recent one was held in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 24 and 25. In this edition, it was decided to increase defence spending by each country. According to the new language, "allies commit to invest 5 per cent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035." Most of the member nations agreed, while Spain said it would only invest two per cent.

NATO is also written as OTAN. It looks like the letters are reversed for some official reason, but that's not the case. Here is why the official sign carries both the words NATO and OTAN.

Is OTAN NATO written backwards? Not really! Here's why both words are seen on defence bloc's sign

NATO chief Mark Rutte's "daddy" remark at the summit in The Hague went viral and raised eyebrows. Following the reaction, he has been forced to backtrack. Rutte apparently called US President Donald Trump "daddy" while commenting on the Iran-Israel war. He was backing Trump's use of the F word in reference to the ongoing crisis in the Middle East. "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing," Trump said. The two met later, and on Wednesday, Rutte said, "Daddy has to use strong language" on the matter of the Iran-Israel conflict so that things can be sorted out. Trump agreed to Rutte's comments."You have to use strong language. Every once in a while, you have to use a certain word," the president said.&nbsp;However, this did not go down well with anyone in the world, and Rutte started facing backlash for using the word "daddy" for Trump.Rutte was forced to defend his words, saying, "The daddy thing, I didn't call [Trump] daddy, what I said, is that sometimes... In Europe, I hear sometimes countries saying, "hey, Mark, will the US stay with us?"&nbsp;And I said, "that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'hey, are you still staying with the family'"? So in that sense, I use daddy, not that I was calling President Trump daddy," Rutte said, Daily Mail reported.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/donald-trump-nato-ukrainian-journalist-husband-soldier-heart-warming-exchange-1750907342186">VIDEO: Ukrainian journalist holds back tears as Trump asks her about her soldier husband fighting Russia</a>&nbsp;<h2>“Like two kids in the schoolyard”</h2>&nbsp;While meeting Rutte, Trump said that the Iran-Israel ceasefire will hold.&nbsp;'They're not going to be fighting each other, they've had it. Like two kids in the schoolyard, they fight like hell, you can't stop them. Let them fight for two or three minutes, then it's easy to stop them," Trump said. Rutte chimed in with the "daddy" comment.Meanwhile, Trump was asked at the concluding press conference about being called "daddy" by Rutte. He said, "No, he likes me, I think he likes me! If he doesn't, I'll let you know and I'll come back and I'll hit him hard, OK?" "He did it very&nbsp;affectionately, though. 'Daddy, you're my daddy,"' the president smiled and said.At the defence bloc's gathering in The Hague, Trump proposed a big increase in defence spending, which was backed by other leaders. The new &nbsp;language states that "allies commit to invest 5 per cent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035." Most of the member nations agreed, while Spain said it would only invest two per cent.&nbsp; &nbsp;

NATO chief Mark Rutte says he didn't really call Trump “daddy” at the summit. He presented his point of view and tried to clarify what he actually meant. Meanwhile, the US president apparently loved being called “daddy” in front of the world.

NATO chief Mark Rutte's "daddy" remark at the summit in The Hague went viral and raised eyebrows. Following the reaction, he has been forced to backtrack. Rutte apparently called US President Donald Trump "daddy" while commenting on the Iran-Israel war. He was backing Trump's use of the F word in reference to the ongoing crisis in the Middle East. "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing," Trump said. The two met later, and on Wednesday, Rutte said, "Daddy has to use strong language" on the matter of the Iran-Israel conflict so that things can be sorted out. Trump agreed to Rutte's comments. "You have to use strong language. Every once in a while, you have to use a certain word," the president said. However, this did not go down well with anyone in the world, and Rutte started facing backlash for using the word "daddy" for Trump. Rutte was forced to defend his words, saying, "The daddy thing, I didn't call [Trump] daddy, what I said, is that sometimes... In Europe, I hear sometimes countries saying, "hey, Mark, will the US stay with us?" And I said, "that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'hey, are you still staying with the family'"? So in that sense, I use daddy, not that I was calling President Trump daddy," Rutte said, Daily Mail reported. Also Read: VIDEO: Ukrainian journalist holds back tears as Trump asks her about her soldier husband fighting Russia “Like two kids in the schoolyard” While meeting Rutte, Trump said that the Iran-Israel ceasefire will hold. 'They're not going to be fighting each other, they've had it. Like two kids in the schoolyard, they fight like hell, you can't stop them. Let them fight for two or three minutes, then it's easy to stop them," Trump said. Rutte chimed in with the "daddy" comment. Meanwhile, Trump was asked at the concluding press conference about being called "daddy" by Rutte. He said, "No, he likes me, I think he likes me! If he doesn't, I'll let you know and I'll come back and I'll hit him hard, OK?" "He did it very affectionately, though. 'Daddy, you're my daddy,"' the president smiled and said. At the defence bloc's gathering in The Hague, Trump proposed a big increase in defence spending, which was backed by other leaders. The new language states that "allies commit to invest 5 per cent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035." Most of the member nations agreed, while Spain said it would only invest two per cent.

NATO chief Mark Rutte says he didn't really call Trump “daddy” at the summit. He presented his point of view and tried to clarify what he actually meant. Meanwhile, the US president apparently loved being called “daddy” in front of the world.

'The daddy thing, I didn't...': Embarrassed NATO chief Rutte does an about-turn on Trump 'daddy' remark

Donald Trump shared an exchange he had with a Ukrainian journalist whose husband is a soldier and is fighting in the war against Russia. At the NATO Summit, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked the president whether the US would give Ukraine Patriot missiles. She informed him that ever since the war broke out, she has been staying in Warsaw, Poland, with her kids, while her husband is fighting the war against Moscow. This jolted Trump, who said, "That’s rough". At the end of the NATO Summit in The Hague, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked Trump at the press conference, "whether or not the US is ready to sell anti-air missile systems to Ukraine."After Trump pointed at her to ask a question, he asked, "Where are you from?" "I'm from Ukraine," the woman said, and asked about the Patriot missiles, saying that "Russia has been pounding Ukraine really heavily right now."Trump asked the reporter, "Are you living yourself now in Ukraine?" She said, "My husband is there," to which a visibly moved Trump interjected, "Wow. I can see you're … you know, it's amazing." The woman said, "Me with the kids, I'm in Warsaw, actually, because he wanted me to.""Is your husband a soldier?" Trump asked. The woman responded, "He is."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/is-that-a-suit-zelensky-finally-seen-in-formal-attire-at-dinner-with-the-dutch-royals-1750839272322">Is that a suit? Zelensky finally seen in formal attire at dinner with the Dutch royals</a> Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-tried-to-demean-great-work-our-b-2-pilots-did-trump-blasts-bad-and-sick-media-outlets-1750874874034">‘Tried to demean great work our B-2 pilots did’: Trump blasts ‘BAD AND SICK’ media outlets</a>&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump gets emotional as he is asked by a Ukrainian reporter whose husband serves in Ukraine about whether he will supply air defenses to Ukraine. Quite a moment in the press conference. <a href="https://t.co/MPW8dV3j3k">pic.twitter.com/MPW8dV3j3k</a>&mdash; Yaroslav Trofimov (@yarotrof) <a href="https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1937882754877718626?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"He is there now, wow. That's rough stuff. And you are living here?", "In Warsaw," the woman says."Let me just tell you, they do want to have the anti-missile missile, as we call it. You know, they're very hard to get. We need them too. We were supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective. 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective," Trump tells the reporter.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-zelensky-responds-to-putin-s-threat-to-conquer-all-of-ukraine-1750773057841/embed&nbsp;"That's a very good question. And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see that it's very upsetting to you. Say hello to your husband, OK," Trump says at the end of the conversation.Trump was quite aggressive towards the other journalists at the conference. His empathetic exchange with the Ukrainian journalist was definitely one of the highlights of the day.Earlier in the day, Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the summit and suggested that an increase in spending by the trans-Atlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its other neighbours. Trump has been upset with Putin for not ending the war. Last month, Moscow hit Ukraine with a barrage of 300 drone and missile attacks, which prompted Trump to lash out at him, calling him "crazy."

Donald Trump had a heart-warming exchange with a Ukrainian journalist at the NATO Summit. The US president was visibly moved after she told him that her husband was a soldier and fighting the war against Russia, while she stayed in Warsaw with the kids. 

Donald Trump shared an exchange he had with a Ukrainian journalist whose husband is a soldier and is fighting in the war against Russia. At the NATO Summit, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked the president whether the US would give Ukraine Patriot missiles. She informed him that ever since the war broke out, she has been staying in Warsaw, Poland, with her kids, while her husband is fighting the war against Moscow. This jolted Trump, who said, "That’s rough". At the end of the NATO Summit in The Hague, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked Trump at the press conference, "whether or not the US is ready to sell anti-air missile systems to Ukraine." After Trump pointed at her to ask a question, he asked, "Where are you from?" "I'm from Ukraine," the woman said, and asked about the Patriot missiles, saying that "Russia has been pounding Ukraine really heavily right now." Trump asked the reporter, "Are you living yourself now in Ukraine?" She said, "My husband is there," to which a visibly moved Trump interjected, "Wow. I can see you're … you know, it's amazing." The woman said, "Me with the kids, I'm in Warsaw, actually, because he wanted me to." "Is your husband a soldier?" Trump asked. The woman responded, "He is." Also Read: Is that a suit? Zelensky finally seen in formal attire at dinner with the Dutch royals Also Read: ‘Tried to demean great work our B-2 pilots did’: Trump blasts ‘BAD AND SICK’ media outlets

Donald Trump had a heart-warming exchange with a Ukrainian journalist at the NATO Summit. The US president was visibly moved after she told him that her husband was a soldier and fighting the war against Russia, while she stayed in Warsaw with the kids.&nbsp;

VIDEO: Ukrainian journalist holds back tears as Trump asks her about her soldier husband fighting Russia

The NATO Summit kicks off in the Netherlands, with discussions focusing on several agendas, including the Israel-Iran war, the Russia-Ukraine war and more.&nbsp;US President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday (Jun 25) on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague.&nbsp;President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States will hold fresh talks with Iran next week, with a possible nuclear agreement on the table.&nbsp;Click on the headlines for more&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/live-updates/world/nato-summit-live-trump-to-meet-zelensky-on-second-day-of-summit-at-the-hague-says-will-discuss-his-difficulties-1750844427117">NATO Summit LIVE: Trump calls PM Modi a 'great friend', again claims credit for ending India-Pakistan war</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750862331244.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="NATO Summit LIVE: Trump calls PM Modi a 'great friend', again claims credit for ending India-Pakistan war"></figure>&nbsp;As the NATO Summit kickstarts in the Netherlands, with discussions focusing on several agendas, including Israel-Iran war, Russia-Ukraine war and more. US President Donald Trump praised the success of recent strikes on Iran's nuclear programme. NATO Chief Mark Rutte urged allies and industries to do more, better and together, stressing on the demand signal NATO is sending to the defence industry.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-putin-is-difficult-trump-says-after-very-nice-meeting-with-zelensky-at-nato-summit-1750863724729">‘Putin is difficult’: Trump says after ‘very nice’ meeting with Zelensky at NATO summit</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750863805648.jpg?rect=(0,2,1196,897)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="‘Putin is difficult’: Trump says after ‘very nice’ meeting with Zelensky at NATO summit"></figure>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday (Jun 25) on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague. Following the meeting, which lasted 50 minutes, Trump said, “I wanted to know how he’s doing,” and said the meeting was “very nice” even though they “had little rough times” in the past.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-nuclear-talks-back-on-table-trump-says-washington-tehran-may-sign-an-agreement-next-week-1750863430026">US-Iran nuclear talks back on table? Trump says Washington, Tehran 'may sign an agreement' next week</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750863774627.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="US-Iran nuclear talks back on table? Trump says Washington, Tehran 'may sign an agreement' next week"></figure>&nbsp;President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States will hold fresh talks with Iran next week, with a possible nuclear agreement on the table.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-badly-damaged-iran-s-first-admission-of-damage-to-its-nuclear-facilities-in-us-strikes-1750856972488">‘Badly damaged’: Iran's first admission of damage to its nuclear facilities in US strikes</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750857516152.jpg?rect=(0,121,1212,907)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="‘Badly damaged’: Iran's first admission of damage to its nuclear facilities in US strikes"></figure>&nbsp;Iran has finally admitted that its nuclear facilities have in fact been “badly damaged” in the US strikes. Esmail Baghaei, the spokesman of Iran’s foreign ministry, told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged.” However, he refused to share any details of the damage or the status of the nuclear facilities.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/gaza-ceasefire-talks-intensified-says-hamas-as-trump-believes-great-progress-being-made-1750849782429">Gaza ceasefire talks ‘intensified,’ says Hamas as Trump believes ‘great progress being made’</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750849795373.jpg?rect=(0,58,908,682)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Gaza ceasefire talks ‘intensified,’ says Hamas as Trump believes ‘great progress being made’"></figure>&nbsp;A senior Hamas official told AFP on Wednesday (Jun 25) that negotiations for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and the Palestinian militant group have “intensified in recent hours” with mediator countries. “Our communications with the brother mediators in Egypt and Qatar have not stopped and have intensified in recent hours,” Taher al-Nunu said.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-daddy-has-to-sometimes-nato-chief-rutte-reacts-to-trump-calling-israel-iran-two-kids-here-s-what-he-said-1750854170837">'Daddy has to sometimes...': NATO Chief Rutte reacts to Trump calling Israel, Iran 'two kids' - Here's what he said</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750854752232.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Daddy has to sometimes...': NATO Chief Rutte reacts to Trump calling Israel, Iran 'two kids' - Here's what he said"></figure>&nbsp;NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Wednesday reacted to US President Donald Trump's statement, where he called Israel and Iran "two kids in a schoolyard." Rutte made a "daddy" remark on the US president's statement on the sidelines of NATO Summit in The Hague.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-the-us-strike-iran-again-trump-says-it-depends-on-this-one-thing-1750854363174">Will the US strike Iran again? Trump says it depends on THIS one thing</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750854622334.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Will the US strike Iran again? Trump says it depends on THIS one&nbsp;thing"></figure>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump has suggested that further American strikes on Iran are possible if the country resumes work on its nuclear programme. His comments came during the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday (June 25).&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/explained-why-does-it-take-28-hours-for-axiom-4-astronauts-reach-space-station-1750865814127">EXPLAINED | Why does it take 28 hours for Axiom-4 astronauts to reach space station?</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750866351520.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="EXPLAINED | Why does it take 28 hours for Axiom-4 astronauts to reach space station?"></figure>&nbsp;Axiom-4 astronauts aboard the Crew Dragon capsule, nestled atop the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, blasted off at 12:01 pm Indian time, 25th June, Wednesday. Barely 13 minutes after liftoff, the SpaceX rocket placed them in orbit around the Earth, and the crew began feeling microgravity-induced weightlessness. However, their journey to the International Space Station would take as much as 28 hours.&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750854101328.png?rect=(0,160,960,720)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Diljit Dosanjh got emotional representing Punjab at Met Gala, says Cartier ‘stole’ Maharaja of Patiala’s diamond necklace"></figure>&nbsp;Diljit Dosanjh is now a global star. The actor-singer made heads turn with his maiden appearance at the Met Gala 2025 earlier this year. Dressed like a Maharaja, Diljit’s look was designed by Prabal Gurung and created quite a stir with Diljit making it to best best-dressed list of several fashion pages. Now, over a month later, Diljit has revealed that he always wanted to dress up as a King on the global stage. Diljit also admitted that he had teared up when he first thought of wearing a cape with a map of Punjab on it.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/-i-am-not-that-happy-with-my-performance-today-says-neeraj-chopra-after-winning-ostrava-golden-spike-win-1750848450372">'I am not that happy with my performance today', says Neeraj Chopra after winning Ostrava Golden Spike win</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250625/image-1750849000587.jpg?rect=(0,63,992,744)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'I am not that happy with my performance today', says Neeraj Chopra after winning Ostrava Golden Spike win"></figure>&nbsp;Neeraj Chopra might have won the Golden Spike title in his first outing at the meet, but the two-time Olympic champion was not pleased with his throw. Chopra's personal best effort of 85.29m was sufficient to win the event in a nine-man field, at the World Athletics Continental Tour Gold meet on Tuesday (June 24).

Stay updated with our top stories from around the world, offering you a comprehensive overview of today's most impactful news and events.

The NATO Summit kicks off in the Netherlands, with discussions focusing on several agendas, including the Israel-Iran war, the Russia-Ukraine war and more. US President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday (Jun 25) on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States will hold fresh talks with Iran next week, with a possible nuclear agreement on the table. Click on the headlines for more NATO Summit LIVE: Trump calls PM Modi a 'great friend', again claims credit for ending India-Pakistan war As the NATO Summit kickstarts in the Netherlands, with discussions focusing on several agendas, including Israel-Iran war, Russia-Ukraine war and more. US President Donald Trump praised the success of recent strikes on Iran's nuclear programme. NATO Chief Mark Rutte urged allies and industries to do more, better and together, stressing on the demand signal NATO is sending to the defence industry. ‘Putin is difficult’: Trump says after ‘very nice’ meeting with Zelensky at NATO summit US President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday (Jun 25) on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague. Following the meeting, which lasted 50 minutes, Trump said, “I wanted to know how he’s doing,” and said the meeting was “very nice” even though they “had little rough times” in the past. US-Iran nuclear talks back on table? Trump says Washington, Tehran 'may sign an agreement' next week President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States will hold fresh talks with Iran next week, with a possible nuclear agreement on the table. ‘Badly damaged’: Iran's first admission of damage to its nuclear facilities in US strikes Iran has finally admitted that its nuclear facilities have in fact been “badly damaged” in the US strikes. Esmail Baghaei, the spokesman of Iran’s foreign ministry, told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged.” However, he refused to share any details of the damage or the status of the nuclear facilities. Gaza ceasefire talks ‘intensified,’ says Hamas as Trump believes ‘great progress being made’ A senior Hamas official told AFP on Wednesday (Jun 25) that negotiations for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and the Palestinian militant group have “intensified in recent hours” with mediator countries. “Our communications with the brother mediators in Egypt and Qatar have not stopped and have intensified in recent hours,” Taher al-Nunu said. 'Daddy has to sometimes...': NATO Chief Rutte reacts to Trump calling Israel, Iran 'two kids' - Here's what he said NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Wednesday reacted to US President Donald Trump's statement, where he called Israel and Iran "two kids in a schoolyard." Rutte made a "daddy" remark on the US president's statement on the sidelines of NATO Summit in The Hague. Will the US strike Iran again? Trump says it depends on THIS one thing US President Donald Trump has suggested that further American strikes on Iran are possible if the country resumes work on its nuclear programme. His comments came during the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday (June 25). EXPLAINED | Why does it take 28 hours for Axiom-4 astronauts to reach space station? Axiom-4 astronauts aboard the Crew Dragon capsule, nestled atop the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, blasted off at 12:01 pm Indian time, 25th June, Wednesday. Barely 13 minutes after liftoff, the SpaceX rocket placed them in orbit around the Earth, and the crew began feeling microgravity-induced weightlessness. However, their journey to the International Space Station would take as much as 28 hours. Diljit Dosanjh is now a global star. The actor-singer made heads turn with his maiden appearance at the Met Gala 2025 earlier this year. Dressed like a Maharaja, Diljit’s look was designed by Prabal Gurung and created quite a stir with Diljit making it to best best-dressed list of several fashion pages. Now, over a month later, Diljit has revealed that he always wanted to dress up as a King on the global stage. Diljit also admitted that he had teared up when he first thought of wearing a cape with a map of Punjab on it. 'I am not that happy with my performance today', says Neeraj Chopra after winning Ostrava Golden Spike win Neeraj Chopra might have won the Golden Spike title in his first outing at the meet, but the two-time Olympic champion was not pleased with his throw. Chopra's personal best effort of 85.29m was sufficient to win the event in a nine-man field, at the World Athletics Continental Tour Gold meet on Tuesday (June 24).

Stay updated with our top stories from around the world, offering you a comprehensive overview of today's most impactful news and events.

Top 10 world news: NATO Summit updates; Trump-Zelensky meet, and more

Britain on Tuesday (Jun 24) announced that it would reintroduce fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons. Calling it the "biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation," Downing Street said that the United Kingdom's Prime Minister Keir Starmer would announce the plan at a NATO summit on Wednesday. The UK PM, meanwhile, in a statement, said that the country will acquire 12 F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons from the United States. The move marks a dramatic shift in Britain’s nuclear doctrine, which for decades has relied solely on submarine-launched ballistic missiles for deterrence.<h2>A new era</h2>Keir Starmer, in a statement, said that the "These F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our Allies". Praising the announcement, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said, "I strongly welcome today's announcement" and praised the move as "yet another robust British contribution to NATO."The F-35A jets, built by Lockheed Martin, differ from the F-35Bs currently used by the UK in one key way: they can be armed with nuclear warheads.Watch | High stakes at NATO summit: 5% defense push, Trump-Zelensky meeting, Iran tensions<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/high-stakes-at-nato-summit-5-defense-push-trump-zelensky-meeting-iran-tensions-1750812878060/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/high-stakes-at-nato-summit-5-defense-push-trump-zelensky-meeting-iran-tensions-1750812878060/embed</a>As per reports, they'll be based at Marham Air Force Base in eastern England and are set to bolster NATO’s nuclear sharing strategy — a Cold War-era mission that has gained new relevance with Russia's continued war in Ukraine.<h2>From under the sea to back in the skies</h2>Since the Cold War's end, the UK's nuclear deterrent has lived beneath the waves — carried aboard Royal Navy submarines. Tactical, air-delivered nukes were largely seen as relics of a bygone era.Talking to AFP, Heloise Fayet, a nuclear expert at France's Institute of International Relations (Ifri) said that at the time, "there was no longer any real interest in tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, because the threat had disappeared".That, she added, has changed. Fayet said that the UK's announcement illustrates "the continued re-nuclearisation of Europe, the renewed need for nuclear weapons, and the strengthening of NATO's deterrence, in the face of an adversary, Russia", which has been at war with Ukraine for three years.&nbsp;

UK PM Keir Starmer, in a statement, said that the country will acquire 12 F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons from the United States. 

Britain on Tuesday (Jun 24) announced that it would reintroduce fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons. Calling it the "biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation," Downing Street said that the United Kingdom's Prime Minister Keir Starmer would announce the plan at a NATO summit on Wednesday. The UK PM, meanwhile, in a statement, said that the country will acquire 12 F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons from the United States. The move marks a dramatic shift in Britain’s nuclear doctrine, which for decades has relied solely on submarine-launched ballistic missiles for deterrence. A new era Keir Starmer, in a statement, said that the "These F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our Allies". Praising the announcement, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said, "I strongly welcome today's announcement" and praised the move as "yet another robust British contribution to NATO." The F-35A jets, built by Lockheed Martin, differ from the F-35Bs currently used by the UK in one key way: they can be armed with nuclear warheads. Watch | High stakes at NATO summit: 5% defense push, Trump-Zelensky meeting, Iran tensions https://www.wionews.com/videos/high-stakes-at-nato-summit-5-defense-push-trump-zelensky-meeting-iran-tensions-1750812878060/embed As per reports, they'll be based at Marham Air Force Base in eastern England and are set to bolster NATO’s nuclear sharing strategy — a Cold War-era mission that has gained new relevance with Russia's continued war in Ukraine. From under the sea to back in the skies Since the Cold War's end, the UK's nuclear deterrent has lived beneath the waves — carried aboard Royal Navy submarines. Tactical, air-delivered nukes were largely seen as relics of a bygone era. Talking to AFP, Heloise Fayet, a nuclear expert at France's Institute of International Relations (Ifri) said that at the time, "there was no longer any real interest in tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, because the threat had disappeared". That, she added, has changed. Fayet said that the UK's announcement illustrates "the continued re-nuclearisation of Europe, the renewed need for nuclear weapons, and the strengthening of NATO's deterrence, in the face of an adversary, Russia", which has been at war with Ukraine for three years.

UK PM Keir Starmer, in a statement, said that the country will acquire 12 F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons from the United States.&nbsp;

UK to acquire F-35A jets from US, revive airborne nuclear capability in major NATO shift

NATO is about to rewrite its defence rulebook. At a summit in The Hague this week, leaders of the 32-member alliance are expected to adopt a bold new spending pledge: committing 5 per cent of national GDP to defence and security. The move, pushed strongly by US President Donald Trump, marks NATO’s biggest shift in military budgeting in over a decade. But it’s also dividing the bloc, with countries like Spain openly resisting, even as Russia looms large on the eastern front.<h2>What is NATO’s 5% defence target?</h2>It’s not just more of the same. NATO’s new target splits military spending into two clear buckets: 3.5 per cent of GDP will be allocated to core defence — covering troops, weapons, fighter jets, tanks, and combat readiness. The remaining 1.5 per cent is earmarked for broader security-related investments, including military-grade infrastructure, cybersecurity frameworks, and energy pipeline protection.&nbsp;This new benchmark replaces the current 2 per cent GDP target agreed at the 2014 Wales summit, expanding the scope of what qualifies as defence spending. As per Reuters, the revised framework is intended to capture not only battlefield capabilities but also long-term resilience against hybrid threats.<h2>Why now?</h2>The push comes amid rising fears of a future Russian assault on NATO territory. Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who took over from Jens Stoltenberg earlier this month, warned that “Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years.”&nbsp;The war in Ukraine has already stretched Europe’s defence posture. With the United States under Trump urging allies to shoulder more responsibility, the political pressure on Europe is mounting. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed this sentiment, stating that “America can’t be everywhere all the time, nor should we be.”<h2>The spending gap: Who’s ready, who’s lagging?</h2>NATO’s own estimates show that 22 of its 32 members met the current 2 per cent GDP defence threshold in 2024, &nbsp;a record high. But reaching the 5 per cent mark will be a much steeper climb for many. Poland, which borders war-torn Ukraine, already spends over 4 per cent of its GDP on defence, making it the alliance’s most aggressive spender. The United States currently allocates around 3.5 per cent, which aligns closely with the proposed benchmark for core military readiness. In contrast, Spain’s military budget was just 1.3 per cent of GDP last year, and Madrid has been vocal in its opposition to the new target.&nbsp;Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has insisted that his country can meet NATO’s military capability goals with a more modest 2.1 per cent allocation. While Spain approved the draft summit declaration, it made clear it does not intend to meet the full 5 per cent figure. NATO officials, however, maintain there is no formal opt-out. Spain’s contribution will be tracked, and any shortfalls will be addressed through peer reviews, as per Reuters.&nbsp;<h2>What will the extra billions buy?</h2>The additional spending is expected to fund a wide expansion in NATO’s military capacity by 2035. Although the specifics remain classified, Secretary-General Rutte has stated that key investment areas include air and missile defence systems, fighter jets, tanks, unmanned drones, military logistics, and troop readiness. Beyond conventional military assets, the alliance is also focusing on hardening infrastructure, upgrading ports, railways, and road networks to handle military convoys, and building cyber-resilience across critical systems.&nbsp;According to Reuters, NATO states collectively spent about $1.3 trillion on core defence in 2024. If all members had spent 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence that year, the total would have climbed to $1.75 trillion, a gap of roughly $450 billion. Including the broader 1.5 per cent category, the combined military budgets of NATO states could grow by several hundred billion dollars annually over the next decade.<h2>Who pays the bill?</h2>Each NATO country will decide how to meet its spending obligations, whether by reallocating budget priorities, raising taxes, or borrowing. The European Union has stepped in to ease the fiscal transition. Member states are now permitted to raise defence spending by up to 1.5 per cent of GDP for four consecutive years without breaching the bloc’s budget deficit limits.&nbsp;Additionally, the EU has approved the creation of a €150 billion arms fund to finance joint defence initiatives through low-interest loans. Some member states, including France and Poland, are calling for this fund to provide grants instead of loans, a proposal that has met resistance from fiscally conservative nations such as Germany and the Netherlands.<h2>How does NATO stack up against rivals?</h2>According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Russia dedicated an estimated 7.1 per cent of GDP to its military in 2024, amounting to $149 billion, a staggering 38 per cent rise from the previous year. China, meanwhile, spent around 1.7 per cent of GDP, but remains the world’s second-largest military spender in absolute terms.&nbsp;While NATO nations typically allocate a smaller percentage of GDP to defence, they collectively outspend Russia by a wide margin. Still, proximity to conflict zones and the speed of mobilisation remain critical challenges.<h2>A turning point for NATO</h2>The 5 per cent defence spending target marks a profound shift in NATO’s strategic mindset, from a post-Cold War posture of deterrence to a wartime footing focused on rapid response and resilience. But the road ahead may not be smooth. Countries like Belgium, Canada, and even Germany are expected to face political and economic hurdles in reaching the target. Italy has signalled it will comply over time, while others such as the UK under Prime Minister Starmer have pledged full support, targeting 4.1 per cent by 2027 and 5 per cent by 2035.&nbsp;The Hague summit may provide a unifying vision, but the true test will be implementation. NATO’s credibility as a collective defence pact hinges not just on promises made at summits, but on budgets passed in parliaments.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

This change, influenced by US President Trump, is split into 3.5 per cent for core defence and 1.5 per cent for broader security investments. Some countries, like Spain, oppose this increase, arguing that their current allocations can meet NATO goals. 

NATO is about to rewrite its defence rulebook. At a summit in The Hague this week, leaders of the 32-member alliance are expected to adopt a bold new spending pledge: committing 5 per cent of national GDP to defence and security. The move, pushed strongly by US President Donald Trump, marks NATO’s biggest shift in military budgeting in over a decade. But it’s also dividing the bloc, with countries like Spain openly resisting, even as Russia looms large on the eastern front. What is NATO’s 5% defence target? It’s not just more of the same. NATO’s new target splits military spending into two clear buckets: 3.5 per cent of GDP will be allocated to core defence — covering troops, weapons, fighter jets, tanks, and combat readiness. The remaining 1.5 per cent is earmarked for broader security-related investments, including military-grade infrastructure, cybersecurity frameworks, and energy pipeline protection. This new benchmark replaces the current 2 per cent GDP target agreed at the 2014 Wales summit, expanding the scope of what qualifies as defence spending. As per Reuters, the revised framework is intended to capture not only battlefield capabilities but also long-term resilience against hybrid threats. Why now? The push comes amid rising fears of a future Russian assault on NATO territory. Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who took over from Jens Stoltenberg earlier this month, warned that “Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years.” The war in Ukraine has already stretched Europe’s defence posture. With the United States under Trump urging allies to shoulder more responsibility, the political pressure on Europe is mounting. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed this sentiment, stating that “America can’t be everywhere all the time, nor should we be.” The spending gap: Who’s ready, who’s lagging? NATO’s own estimates show that 22 of its 32 members met the current 2 per cent GDP defence threshold in 2024, a record high. But reaching the 5 per cent mark will be a much steeper climb for many. Poland, which borders war-torn Ukraine, already spends over 4 per cent of its GDP on defence, making it the alliance’s most aggressive spender. The United States currently allocates around 3.5 per cent, which aligns closely with the proposed benchmark for core military readiness. In contrast, Spain’s military budget was just 1.3 per cent of GDP last year, and Madrid has been vocal in its opposition to the new target. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has insisted that his country can meet NATO’s military capability goals with a more modest 2.1 per cent allocation. While Spain approved the draft summit declaration, it made clear it does not intend to meet the full 5 per cent figure. NATO officials, however, maintain there is no formal opt-out. Spain’s contribution will be tracked, and any shortfalls will be addressed through peer reviews, as per Reuters. What will the extra billions buy? The additional spending is expected to fund a wide expansion in NATO’s military capacity by 2035. Although the specifics remain classified, Secretary-General Rutte has stated that key investment areas include air and missile defence systems, fighter jets, tanks, unmanned drones, military logistics, and troop readiness. Beyond conventional military assets, the alliance is also focusing on hardening infrastructure, upgrading ports, railways, and road networks to handle military convoys, and building cyber-resilience across critical systems. According to Reuters, NATO states collectively spent about $1.3 trillion on core defence in 2024. If all members had spent 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence that year, the total would have climbed to $1.75 trillion, a gap of roughly $450 billion. Including the broader 1.5 per cent category, the combined military budgets of NATO states could grow by several hundred billion dollars annually over the next decade. Who pays the bill? Each NATO country will decide how to meet its spending obligations, whether by reallocating budget priorities, raising taxes, or borrowing. The European Union has stepped in to ease the fiscal transition. Member states are now permitted to raise defence spending by up to 1.5 per cent of GDP for four consecutive years without breaching the bloc’s budget deficit limits. Additionally, the EU has approved the creation of a €150 billion arms fund to finance joint defence initiatives through low-interest loans. Some member states, including France and Poland, are calling for this fund to provide grants instead of loans, a proposal that has met resistance from fiscally conservative nations such as Germany and the Netherlands. How does NATO stack up against rivals? According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Russia dedicated an estimated 7.1 per cent of GDP to its military in 2024, amounting to $149 billion, a staggering 38 per cent rise from the previous year. China, meanwhile, spent around 1.7 per cent of GDP, but remains the world’s second-largest military spender in absolute terms. While NATO nations typically allocate a smaller percentage of GDP to defence, they collectively outspend Russia by a wide margin. Still, proximity to conflict zones and the speed of mobilisation remain critical challenges. A turning point for NATO The 5 per cent defence spending target marks a profound shift in NATO’s strategic mindset, from a post-Cold War posture of deterrence to a wartime footing focused on rapid response and resilience. But the road ahead may not be smooth. Countries like Belgium, Canada, and even Germany are expected to face political and economic hurdles in reaching the target. Italy has signalled it will comply over time, while others such as the UK under Prime Minister Starmer have pledged full support, targeting 4.1 per cent by 2027 and 5 per cent by 2035. The Hague summit may provide a unifying vision, but the true test will be implementation. NATO’s credibility as a collective defence pact hinges not just on promises made at summits, but on budgets passed in parliaments. (With inputs from the agencies)

NATO is set to adopt a new defence spending target of 5 per cent of GDP, a significant increase from the previous 2 per cent goal established at the 2014 Wales summit.

What is NATO’s new 5% defence spending goal and who is against it?

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte issued a warning highlighting that the “massive” military buildup in China raises the risk of a potential invasion of Taiwan, potentially dragging Russia into this and impacting European security.“We have this close relationship with Japan and the Republic of Korea, Australia and New Zealand, exactly for the reason that these countries are very, very worried about the massive military buildup in China that at the moment is taking place,” Mark Rutte said ahead of the Nato summit in The Hague, the Independent reported.Rutte speculated that if China attempt to attack or invade Taiwan, then there is a possibility that Beijing would draw in Vladimir Putin, who would create trouble in Europe to divert the attention and resources of NATO. 'We are all very worried, of course, about the situation in Taiwan. And we also know there is a risk that if the Chinese will try anything with Taiwan, that no doubt he will call his junior partner, Mr Putin, and make sure ... he will keep us busy here, if that would happen', he added.He also noted in his pre-summit address that the rapid expansion of military capabilities of China was evident from the global rise of its defence firms. "We know that out of the 10 biggest defence companies, only a couple of years ago, you would not find any Chinese companies. At this moment, you will find three to five Chinese defence companies in the top 10 of the biggest defence companies in the world. This shows you that this massive buildup is taking place and is having a huge impact, also when it comes to the defence industrial production of China," he also said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-intensifies-military-drills-near-taiwan-for-second-day-us-slams-intimidation-tactics-rising-tensions-8915509">China intensifies military drills near Taiwan for second day; US slams 'intimidation tactics'</a><h3>Does China deploy several warships and planes?</h3>Raising the alarm of potential risk, Rutte emphasised the NATO members to 'stand ready' without being 'naive'. In addition, he also took a dig at potential threats, about the importance of extra defence spending. His statement followed after NATO members on Sunday agreed to a big increase in their defence spending target to 5 per cent of GDP, after the demand of US President Donald Trump.Mark Rutte's remarks also come after China deployed several warships and planes to confine the nation of Taiwan in menacing, large-scale war games in the previous month. In response to the multi-day military drills of China, Taipei scrambled fighter jets and warships of its own to dissuade the People's Liberation Army (PLA) from posing a serious threat.However, these alarming military drills are part of a broader and troubling pattern of growing Chinese aggression toward Taiwan in recent years. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), led by authoritarian President Xi Jinping, considers Taiwan a breakaway region that must eventually be brought under Beijing’s control — even through military force, if necessary.Taiwan, governed by the elected Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), operates as a democratic and self-ruled society. It has actively strengthened its ties with the United States, hoping that Washington’s political, military, and economic influence will help deter China’s expansionist ambitions.Although many analysts believe Beijing is more likely to apply indirect pressure on Taipei — given its economic ties to the West, the risks of conflict, and the high cost of a military invasion — global political, defence, and industry leaders can no longer rule out the possibility of an all-out attack. Such a move would have far-reaching consequences, potentially shaking the global order and igniting a Third World War.<h3>Taiwan is 'of course' a country: President Lai Ching-te</h3>Following China's claim, President Lai Ching-te said on Sunday that Taiwan is "of course" a country, and China lacks historical evidence with legal proof to back up its sovereignty. Lai and his administration firmly reject China’s claims and have repeatedly extended offers for dialogue, all of which have been declined. Beijing labels Lai a “separatist.”China maintains that Taiwan, despite its democratic governance, is an inseparable part of its territory, asserting that the island has belonged to China since ancient times and has no legitimate claim to statehood, according to a report in the news agency Reuters.President Lai, however, pointed out that Taiwan has a long history of resisting foreign domination, citing past uprisings against Japanese colonial rule from 1895 to 1945. He also noted that during the Qing dynasty, Taiwan was officially regarded as a Chinese province for only eight years. &nbsp;

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte speculated that if China attempt to attack or invade Taiwan, then there is a possibility that Beijing would draw in Vladimir Putin, who would create trouble in Europe to divert the attention and resources of NATO.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte issued a warning highlighting that the “massive” military buildup in China raises the risk of a potential invasion of Taiwan, potentially dragging Russia into this and impacting European security. “We have this close relationship with Japan and the Republic of Korea, Australia and New Zealand, exactly for the reason that these countries are very, very worried about the massive military buildup in China that at the moment is taking place,” Mark Rutte said ahead of the Nato summit in The Hague, the Independent reported. Rutte speculated that if China attempt to attack or invade Taiwan, then there is a possibility that Beijing would draw in Vladimir Putin, who would create trouble in Europe to divert the attention and resources of NATO. 'We are all very worried, of course, about the situation in Taiwan. And we also know there is a risk that if the Chinese will try anything with Taiwan, that no doubt he will call his junior partner, Mr Putin, and make sure ... he will keep us busy here, if that would happen', he added. He also noted in his pre-summit address that the rapid expansion of military capabilities of China was evident from the global rise of its defence firms. "We know that out of the 10 biggest defence companies, only a couple of years ago, you would not find any Chinese companies. At this moment, you will find three to five Chinese defence companies in the top 10 of the biggest defence companies in the world. This shows you that this massive buildup is taking place and is having a huge impact, also when it comes to the defence industrial production of China," he also said. Also read: China intensifies military drills near Taiwan for second day; US slams 'intimidation tactics' Does China deploy several warships and planes? Raising the alarm of potential risk, Rutte emphasised the NATO members to 'stand ready' without being 'naive'. In addition, he also took a dig at potential threats, about the importance of extra defence spending. His statement followed after NATO members on Sunday agreed to a big increase in their defence spending target to 5 per cent of GDP, after the demand of US President Donald Trump. Mark Rutte's remarks also come after China deployed several warships and planes to confine the nation of Taiwan in menacing, large-scale war games in the previous month. In response to the multi-day military drills of China, Taipei scrambled fighter jets and warships of its own to dissuade the People's Liberation Army (PLA) from posing a serious threat. However, these alarming military drills are part of a broader and troubling pattern of growing Chinese aggression toward Taiwan in recent years. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), led by authoritarian President Xi Jinping, considers Taiwan a breakaway region that must eventually be brought under Beijing’s control — even through military force, if necessary. Taiwan, governed by the elected Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), operates as a democratic and self-ruled society. It has actively strengthened its ties with the United States, hoping that Washington’s political, military, and economic influence will help deter China’s expansionist ambitions. Although many analysts believe Beijing is more likely to apply indirect pressure on Taipei — given its economic ties to the West, the risks of conflict, and the high cost of a military invasion — global political, defence, and industry leaders can no longer rule out the possibility of an all-out attack. Such a move would have far-reaching consequences, potentially shaking the global order and igniting a Third World War. Taiwan is 'of course' a country: President Lai Ching-te Following China's claim, President Lai Ching-te said on Sunday that Taiwan is "of course" a country, and China lacks historical evidence with legal proof to back up its sovereignty. Lai and his administration firmly reject China’s claims and have repeatedly extended offers for dialogue, all of which have been declined. Beijing labels Lai a “separatist.” China maintains that Taiwan, despite its democratic governance, is an inseparable part of its territory, asserting that the island has belonged to China since ancient times and has no legitimate claim to statehood, according to a report in the news agency Reuters. President Lai, however, pointed out that Taiwan has a long history of resisting foreign domination, citing past uprisings against Japanese colonial rule from 1895 to 1945. He also noted that during the Qing dynasty, Taiwan was officially regarded as a Chinese province for only eight years.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte speculated that if China attempt to attack or invade Taiwan, then there is a possibility that Beijing would draw in Vladimir Putin, who would create trouble in Europe to divert the attention and resources of NATO.

Is China planning to invade Taiwan? NATO raises alarm over 'massive' military buildup

When did the B-2 first make its presence felt in active warfare? The moment came in 1999, during NATO’s campaign in Kosovo. Here’s a breakdown of what happened, along with the long-standing question: did it deliver depleted uranium munitions?

When did the B-2 first make its presence felt in active warfare? The moment came in 1999, during NATO’s campaign in Kosovo. Here’s a breakdown of what happened, along with the long-standing question: did it deliver depleted uranium munitions?

Did US use B-2 bomber to drop depleted uranium in Kosovo War?

Russian President Vladimir Putin, speaking at a late-night press conference in Saint Petersburg on Thursday (June 19), said NATO's push to increase defence spending posed no "threat" to Russia — even as he doubled down on his war effort in Ukraine.His statement comes ahead of a crucial NATO summit. The western military alliance, as per reports, under pressure from US President Donald Trump, will meet in The Hague next week to boost defence spending to five per cent of GDP.It must be noted that Putin's latest statement on NATO's disarmament is in direct contrast to the reason he launched the "special military operation" on Ukraine on 24 February 2022. At the time, the Russian president had claimed that NATO was building up military infrastructure in Ukraine, threatening Russia.<h2>What did Putin say?</h2>In a televised late-night press conference, the Russian president stressed that "We do not see any NATO rearmament as a threat to the Russian Federation." He added that this was "because we are self-sufficient in terms of ensuring our own security."Putin claimed that Russia was "constantly modernising our armed forces and defensive capabilities" and that it made "no sense" for NATO to spend more money on arms.However, he acknowledged that higher defence spending by NATO nations would create some "specific" challenges for Russia.Watch | Putin downplays NATO buildup, says Western rearmament poses 'no threat' to Russiahttps://www.wionews.com/videos/putin-downplays-nato-buildup-says-western-rearmament-poses-no-threat-to-russia-1750305376443/embed"We will counter all threats that arise. There is no doubt about that," he added, claiming that Russia had the "strategic advantage" over Ukraine on the battlefield."Our troops are advancing along the entire line of contact. Every day, more or less, but every day they go forward. And the advance will continue," he said.Putin also voiced his readiness to meet his Ukrainian counterpart, but only during the final phase of ceasefire negotiations. In the same breath, the Russian leader also, once again, dismissed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's legitimacy, claiming his mandate had expired — a narrative Kyiv has previously dismissed as Kremlin propaganda.&nbsp;

In a televised late-night press conference, the Russian president stressed that "We do not see any NATO rearmament as a threat to the Russian Federation." He added that this was "because we are self-sufficient in terms of ensuring our own security."

Russian President Vladimir Putin, speaking at a late-night press conference in Saint Petersburg on Thursday (June 19), said NATO's push to increase defence spending posed no "threat" to Russia — even as he doubled down on his war effort in Ukraine. His statement comes ahead of a crucial NATO summit. The western military alliance, as per reports, under pressure from US President Donald Trump, will meet in The Hague next week to boost defence spending to five per cent of GDP. It must be noted that Putin's latest statement on NATO's disarmament is in direct contrast to the reason he launched the "special military operation" on Ukraine on 24 February 2022. At the time, the Russian president had claimed that NATO was building up military infrastructure in Ukraine, threatening Russia. What did Putin say? In a televised late-night press conference, the Russian president stressed that "We do not see any NATO rearmament as a threat to the Russian Federation." He added that this was "because we are self-sufficient in terms of ensuring our own security." Putin claimed that Russia was "constantly modernising our armed forces and defensive capabilities" and that it made "no sense" for NATO to spend more money on arms. However, he acknowledged that higher defence spending by NATO nations would create some "specific" challenges for Russia. Watch | Putin downplays NATO buildup, says Western rearmament poses 'no threat' to Russia https://www.wionews.com/videos/putin-downplays-nato-buildup-says-western-rearmament-poses-no-threat-to-russia-1750305376443/embed "We will counter all threats that arise. There is no doubt about that," he added, claiming that Russia had the "strategic advantage" over Ukraine on the battlefield. "Our troops are advancing along the entire line of contact. Every day, more or less, but every day they go forward. And the advance will continue," he said. Putin also voiced his readiness to meet his Ukrainian counterpart, but only during the final phase of ceasefire negotiations. In the same breath, the Russian leader also, once again, dismissed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's legitimacy, claiming his mandate had expired — a narrative Kyiv has previously dismissed as Kremlin propaganda.

In a televised late-night press conference, the Russian president stressed that "We do not see any NATO rearmament as a threat to the Russian Federation." He added that this was "because we are self-sufficient in terms of ensuring our own security."

Not a 'threat'? Putin downplays NATO rearmament push — after using it as justification to invade Ukraine for three years

Canada will reach NATO's defence spending target of two per cent this year, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Monday, arguing the country had to revitalise its military "to defend every inch of our sovereign territory."&nbsp;Carney's speech at the University of Toronto included stark warnings about the global security order being shaken by US President Donald Trump.&nbsp;But it extended beyond his concern over future US relations. The prime minister warned Canada has not done enough to prepare itself for evolving threats from China, Russia, cyberattacks and the advancing national security implications of climate change.&nbsp;"The long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect us is becoming increasingly archaic," Carney said.&nbsp;With threats facing the country multiplying, the prime minister said Canada "will achieve NATO's two per cent target this year -- half a decade ahead of schedule."&nbsp;"We are too reliant on the United States," he added.&nbsp;Trump has repeatedly pressured NATO members to increase defence spending, arguing the United States was paying more than its fair share for collective security.&nbsp;In April, the alliance announced that 22 of its 32 members hit the two per cent spending target.&nbsp;But Trump has pushed NATO members to spend even more and warned the United States could refuse to protect countries that don't commit what he considers enough resources to defence.&nbsp;Carney said Canada had become used to a post-war order with the United States as "the global hegemon," and Canada's "closest ally and dominant trading partner."&nbsp;"Now the United States is beginning to monetise its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its contributions to our collective security," he said, condemning Trump's trade war.&nbsp;Carney said Canada would pursue new security relationships with "like-minded partners," with a specific focus on Europe.&nbsp;"We are actively seeking to strengthen transatlantic security," he said, indicating a Canada-EU summit this month will be "will be more important than ever."&nbsp;<h2>'Vulnerable' Arctic</h2> Since taking office in mid-March, Carney has emphasised the changing security landscape in Canada's Arctic, where receding ice caused by climate change is opening the region's vast natural resources to fierce competition.&nbsp;Carney has previously announced plans to substantially expand Canada's military presence in the region, and on Monday he said the "Arctic is becoming more accessible and vulnerable to commercial and military activities."&nbsp;Russia and China are seen as two major rivals who could present increasing Arctic security challenges in the years ahead.&nbsp;Carney framed Monday's military spending announcement as a move designed "to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants."&nbsp;He noted the country's military infrastructure was ageing, with only one of four submarines deemed seaworthy, and less than half of the maritime fleet and land vehicles operational.

Carney's speech at the University of Toronto included stark warnings about the global security order being shaken by US President Donald Trump.

Canada will reach NATO's defence spending target of two per cent this year, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Monday, arguing the country had to revitalise its military "to defend every inch of our sovereign territory." Carney's speech at the University of Toronto included stark warnings about the global security order being shaken by US President Donald Trump. But it extended beyond his concern over future US relations. The prime minister warned Canada has not done enough to prepare itself for evolving threats from China, Russia, cyberattacks and the advancing national security implications of climate change. "The long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect us is becoming increasingly archaic," Carney said. With threats facing the country multiplying, the prime minister said Canada "will achieve NATO's two per cent target this year -- half a decade ahead of schedule." "We are too reliant on the United States," he added. Trump has repeatedly pressured NATO members to increase defence spending, arguing the United States was paying more than its fair share for collective security. In April, the alliance announced that 22 of its 32 members hit the two per cent spending target. But Trump has pushed NATO members to spend even more and warned the United States could refuse to protect countries that don't commit what he considers enough resources to defence. Carney said Canada had become used to a post-war order with the United States as "the global hegemon," and Canada's "closest ally and dominant trading partner." "Now the United States is beginning to monetise its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its contributions to our collective security," he said, condemning Trump's trade war. Carney said Canada would pursue new security relationships with "like-minded partners," with a specific focus on Europe. "We are actively seeking to strengthen transatlantic security," he said, indicating a Canada-EU summit this month will be "will be more important than ever." 'Vulnerable' Arctic Since taking office in mid-March, Carney has emphasised the changing security landscape in Canada's Arctic, where receding ice caused by climate change is opening the region's vast natural resources to fierce competition. Carney has previously announced plans to substantially expand Canada's military presence in the region, and on Monday he said the "Arctic is becoming more accessible and vulnerable to commercial and military activities." Russia and China are seen as two major rivals who could present increasing Arctic security challenges in the years ahead. Carney framed Monday's military spending announcement as a move designed "to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants." He noted the country's military infrastructure was ageing, with only one of four submarines deemed seaworthy, and less than half of the maritime fleet and land vehicles operational.

Carney's speech at the University of Toronto included stark warnings about the global security order being shaken by US President Donald Trump.

Canada to reach 2% defence NATO spending target this year, says Prime Minister Carney

NATO chief Mark Rutte will be seeking a “quantum leap” in defence capacities including a “400 per cent increase” in air and missile defence spending to “protect” the alliance nations in case of any aggression from Russia.“We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,” NATO Secretary General Rutte is scheduled to say in a speech to the Chatham House think tank in London on Monday, as per the comments released in a statement.&nbsp;Russia will remain an imminent threat to NATO even if there is peace in Ukraine, and hence the Western alliance needs to increase its air and missiles defences by 400%, Rutte, the head of the organisation, will say on Monday.&nbsp;<h2>‘We need a quantum leap in our collective defence’</h2>&nbsp;“The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence,” he was to say.&nbsp;“We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells,” Rutte will say in his appeal.&nbsp;“NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance,” he will add.&nbsp;Rutte will meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday ahead of his speech, their second Downing Street talks since Starmer came into power in July 2024.Last week, Britain announced plans to build up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines and six munitions factories to rearm the country in response to “threats” from Russia.The Starmer government has already pledged to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027.&nbsp;US President Donald Trump has been coercing alliance members to announce a major hike in their military budgets.He is pushing NATO members to raise their defence spending to five per cent of their gross domestic product (GDP), up from the current target of two per cent.&nbsp;US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said last week in Brussels the allies were close to an agreement on the five-percent target, which could be formalised at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, later this month.&nbsp;NATO members have been scrambling to bolster their defence capabilities since Russia launched its war against Ukraine in February 2022.

Last week, Britain announced plans to build up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines and six munitions factories to rearm the country in response to “threats” from Russia. The Starmer government has already pledged to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027.

NATO chief Mark Rutte will be seeking a “quantum leap” in defence capacities including a “400 per cent increase” in air and missile defence spending to “protect” the alliance nations in case of any aggression from Russia. “We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,” NATO Secretary General Rutte is scheduled to say in a speech to the Chatham House think tank in London on Monday, as per the comments released in a statement. Russia will remain an imminent threat to NATO even if there is peace in Ukraine, and hence the Western alliance needs to increase its air and missiles defences by 400%, Rutte, the head of the organisation, will say on Monday. ‘We need a quantum leap in our collective defence’ “The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence,” he was to say. “We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells,” Rutte will say in his appeal. “NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance,” he will add. Rutte will meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday ahead of his speech, their second Downing Street talks since Starmer came into power in July 2024. Last week, Britain announced plans to build up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines and six munitions factories to rearm the country in response to “threats” from Russia. The Starmer government has already pledged to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027. US President Donald Trump has been coercing alliance members to announce a major hike in their military budgets. He is pushing NATO members to raise their defence spending to five per cent of their gross domestic product (GDP), up from the current target of two per cent. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said last week in Brussels the allies were close to an agreement on the five-percent target, which could be formalised at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, later this month. NATO members have been scrambling to bolster their defence capabilities since Russia launched its war against Ukraine in February 2022.

Last week, Britain announced plans to build up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines and six munitions factories to rearm the country in response to “threats” from Russia. The Starmer government has already pledged to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027.

NATO chief calls for 400% increase in alliance’s air defence, citing threat from Russia

Far-right leader Geert Wilders brought down the Dutch government Tuesday by pulling out of a shaky coalition in a row over immigration, sparking a political crisis and likely heralding fresh elections.The withdrawal came just weeks before a NATO summit in the Netherlands, and ushered in a period of uncertainty for the European Union's fifth-largest economy and major exporter.After a stormy last-ditch meeting aimed at salvaging the four-party coalition, Wilders emerged to say he had no choice but to pull his ministers out of the cabinet."I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands," said Wilders, 61, whose far-right Freedom Party (PVV) handily won elections in November 2023.Prime Minister Dick Schoof described the decision as "unnecessary and irresponsible" and said he would offer the resignation of the PVV ministers to King Willem-Alexander."I will continue as a caretaker... until a new cabinet is in place. Because life in the Netherlands and abroad does go on," he told reporters.Wilders had agreed with coalition partners to push through what he called the "strictest-ever immigration policy", but he has since said the pace of its introduction had been too slow.Eighteen months after that surprise election victory sent shockwaves through Europe, polls suggest his PVV is still the strongest party.However, the gap to his nearest rivals has narrowed, with the Green/Left party of former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans following close behind.The liberal VVD party, a traditional powerhouse in Dutch politics, is also running near the top two, meaning any election would likely be closely fought.VVD leader Dilan Yesilgoz, visibly angry, described Wilders' move as "super irresponsible", adding she was afraid it would open the door to left-wing parties."How can you do this to the Netherlands," she asked.Any elections would likely be held after the summer break, Sarah de Lange, professor of political pluralism at the University of Amsterdam, told AFP."New elections are likely, but in the Netherlands, organising them takes almost three months. Snap elections in the Netherlands are not as quick as in other countries," she said.- 'Patience has run out' - In late May, Wilders called an impromptu press conference to announce his "patience has now run out" with Schoof's government.He threatened to torpedo the coalition if a new 10-point plan to crimp immigration was not implemented within a few weeks.His plan included border closures for asylum seekers, tougher border controls in general and deporting dual nationals convicted of a crime.Political and legal experts criticised the plans as unworkable or illegal, with some suggesting Wilders was creating a crisis to collapse the government.The far-right leader has often been called the "Dutch Trump" for his anti-immigrant views and instantly recognisable bouffant hairstyle.His ambitions to lead his country were frustrated after his election win, as his coalition partners blocked his premiership bid, settling instead on Schoof as a compromise candidate.The leaders of the four coalition partners agreed not to take up cabinet positions, instead running their parties as parliamentary chiefs.Wilders has been an uncompromising figure in parliament, his quick-witted jousting with Timmermans being a highlight of debates.He has frequently said that the only way to implement his anti-immigrant policies is for him to become prime minister.However, in the fractured Dutch political system, no party can win an absolute majority in the 150-seat parliament and Wilders will need partners.He can count on the support of the BBB farmers' party. The backing of the VVD -- currently an uneasy coalition partner -- is less certain.The fourth party in the current coalition -- the anti-corruption New Social Contract -- has seen support collapse since charismatic leader Pieter Omtzigt stepped down.Far-right parties have been on the rise across Europe. In May, the far-right Chega ("Enough") party took second place in Portuguese elections.In Germany, the anti-immigration far-right AfD doubled its score in legislative elections in February, reaching 20.8 percent.And in Britain, polls show the anti-immigration, hard-right Reform UK party of Nigel Farage is making significant gains following a breakthrough in local elections.Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience.

After a stormy last-ditch meeting aimed at salvaging the four-party coalition, Wilders emerged to say he had no choice but to pull his ministers out of the cabinet.

Far-right leader Geert Wilders brought down the Dutch government Tuesday by pulling out of a shaky coalition in a row over immigration, sparking a political crisis and likely heralding fresh elections. The withdrawal came just weeks before a NATO summit in the Netherlands, and ushered in a period of uncertainty for the European Union's fifth-largest economy and major exporter. After a stormy last-ditch meeting aimed at salvaging the four-party coalition, Wilders emerged to say he had no choice but to pull his ministers out of the cabinet. "I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands," said Wilders, 61, whose far-right Freedom Party (PVV) handily won elections in November 2023. Prime Minister Dick Schoof described the decision as "unnecessary and irresponsible" and said he would offer the resignation of the PVV ministers to King Willem-Alexander. "I will continue as a caretaker... until a new cabinet is in place. Because life in the Netherlands and abroad does go on," he told reporters. Wilders had agreed with coalition partners to push through what he called the "strictest-ever immigration policy", but he has since said the pace of its introduction had been too slow. Eighteen months after that surprise election victory sent shockwaves through Europe, polls suggest his PVV is still the strongest party. However, the gap to his nearest rivals has narrowed, with the Green/Left party of former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans following close behind. The liberal VVD party, a traditional powerhouse in Dutch politics, is also running near the top two, meaning any election would likely be closely fought. VVD leader Dilan Yesilgoz, visibly angry, described Wilders' move as "super irresponsible", adding she was afraid it would open the door to left-wing parties. "How can you do this to the Netherlands," she asked. Any elections would likely be held after the summer break, Sarah de Lange, professor of political pluralism at the University of Amsterdam, told AFP. "New elections are likely, but in the Netherlands, organising them takes almost three months. Snap elections in the Netherlands are not as quick as in other countries," she said. - 'Patience has run out' - In late May, Wilders called an impromptu press conference to announce his "patience has now run out" with Schoof's government. He threatened to torpedo the coalition if a new 10-point plan to crimp immigration was not implemented within a few weeks. His plan included border closures for asylum seekers, tougher border controls in general and deporting dual nationals convicted of a crime. Political and legal experts criticised the plans as unworkable or illegal, with some suggesting Wilders was creating a crisis to collapse the government. The far-right leader has often been called the "Dutch Trump" for his anti-immigrant views and instantly recognisable bouffant hairstyle. His ambitions to lead his country were frustrated after his election win, as his coalition partners blocked his premiership bid, settling instead on Schoof as a compromise candidate. The leaders of the four coalition partners agreed not to take up cabinet positions, instead running their parties as parliamentary chiefs. Wilders has been an uncompromising figure in parliament, his quick-witted jousting with Timmermans being a highlight of debates. He has frequently said that the only way to implement his anti-immigrant policies is for him to become prime minister. However, in the fractured Dutch political system, no party can win an absolute majority in the 150-seat parliament and Wilders will need partners. He can count on the support of the BBB farmers' party. The backing of the VVD -- currently an uneasy coalition partner -- is less certain. The fourth party in the current coalition -- the anti-corruption New Social Contract -- has seen support collapse since charismatic leader Pieter Omtzigt stepped down. Far-right parties have been on the rise across Europe. In May, the far-right Chega ("Enough") party took second place in Portuguese elections. In Germany, the anti-immigration far-right AfD doubled its score in legislative elections in February, reaching 20.8 percent. And in Britain, polls show the anti-immigration, hard-right Reform UK party of Nigel Farage is making significant gains following a breakthrough in local elections. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

After a stormy last-ditch meeting aimed at salvaging the four-party coalition, Wilders emerged to say he had no choice but to pull his ministers out of the cabinet.

Dutch government collapses after far-right leader Wilders exits coalition

Ukraine has been invited to a NATO summit to be held later in June, President Volodymyr Zelensky told reporters, after warning earlier that it would be a “victory” for Russia if it was not there.The heads of NATO states will gather in The Hague, Netherlands, from June 24-26, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and US President Donald Trump’s calls for alliance members to ramp up defence spending set to dominate the agenda.“We were invited to the NATO summit. I think this is important,” Zelensky said on Monday.&nbsp;The invitation was extended during Zelensky’s meeting with Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in Vilnius, Lithuania. Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha has been tasked with preparing the meeting.&nbsp;Zelensky did not say whether he would travel to the Netherlands himself.&nbsp;&nbsp;Ukraine has been fighting a Russian invasion with Western support for more than three years. Kyiv is seeking to shore up its support from Europe because of uncertainties over vital military aid under Trump.Last week, Zelensky had said that “if Ukraine is not present at the NATO summit, it will be a victory for Putin, but not over Ukraine, but over NATO.”Zelensky wants NATO to offer security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire or peace deal with Russia—something Moscow has called “unacceptable”.&nbsp;The Nato summit invitation came as delegations from Ukraine and Russia met for barely an hour in Turkey on Monday for only the second such round of peace negotiations since March 2022.&nbsp;The warring two sides failed to make headway towards an elusive ceasefire, however, delegations from both sides did agree to another large-scale prisoner exchange in their meeting in Istanbul, which in mid-May also hosted their first round of face-to-face talks.&nbsp;Zelensky said, “We really expect Trump to take strong steps”, and urged the US leader to toughen sanctions on Russia to “push” it to agree to a full ceasefire.&nbsp;In Monday’s Istanbul meeting, Ukraine said Moscow had rejected its call for an unconditional ceasefire. It offered instead a partial truce of two to three days in some areas of the front line.&nbsp;Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia invaded eastern and southern Ukraine and forced millions to flee their homes in Europe’s largest refugee crisis since World War II.

The heads of NATO states will gather in The Hague, Netherlands, from June 24-26, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and US President Donald Trump’s calls for alliance members to ramp up defence spending set to dominate the agenda.

Ukraine has been invited to a NATO summit to be held later in June, President Volodymyr Zelensky told reporters, after warning earlier that it would be a “victory” for Russia if it was not there. The heads of NATO states will gather in The Hague, Netherlands, from June 24-26, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and US President Donald Trump’s calls for alliance members to ramp up defence spending set to dominate the agenda. “We were invited to the NATO summit. I think this is important,” Zelensky said on Monday. The invitation was extended during Zelensky’s meeting with Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in Vilnius, Lithuania. Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha has been tasked with preparing the meeting. Zelensky did not say whether he would travel to the Netherlands himself. Ukraine has been fighting a Russian invasion with Western support for more than three years. Kyiv is seeking to shore up its support from Europe because of uncertainties over vital military aid under Trump. Last week, Zelensky had said that “if Ukraine is not present at the NATO summit, it will be a victory for Putin, but not over Ukraine, but over NATO.” Zelensky wants NATO to offer security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire or peace deal with Russia—something Moscow has called “unacceptable”. The Nato summit invitation came as delegations from Ukraine and Russia met for barely an hour in Turkey on Monday for only the second such round of peace negotiations since March 2022. The warring two sides failed to make headway towards an elusive ceasefire, however, delegations from both sides did agree to another large-scale prisoner exchange in their meeting in Istanbul, which in mid-May also hosted their first round of face-to-face talks. Zelensky said, “We really expect Trump to take strong steps”, and urged the US leader to toughen sanctions on Russia to “push” it to agree to a full ceasefire. In Monday’s Istanbul meeting, Ukraine said Moscow had rejected its call for an unconditional ceasefire. It offered instead a partial truce of two to three days in some areas of the front line. Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia invaded eastern and southern Ukraine and forced millions to flee their homes in Europe’s largest refugee crisis since World War II.

The heads of NATO states will gather in The Hague, Netherlands, from June 24-26, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and US President Donald Trump’s calls for alliance members to ramp up defence spending set to dominate the agenda.

Ukraine invited to NATO summit in The Hague: Zelensky

NATO chief Mark Rutte said that talks on ceasefire and lasting peace in <a href="https://www.wionews.com/tags/ukraine">Ukraine</a>, led by US President Donald Trump, were &ldquo;not easy&rdquo;. He also condemned <a href="https://www.wionews.com/tags/russia-0">Russia&rsquo;s </a>&ldquo;terrible pattern&rdquo; of attacks on Ukrainian civilians.
Rutte met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky during a surprise visit to the port city of Odesa.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zelensky-vances-relationship-hits-new-low-us-vp-hits-back-after-ukraine-accuses-us-of-siding-with-russia-8965615">'Sort of absurd': Zelensky, Vance&rsquo;s relationship hits new low; US VP hits back after Ukraine accuses US of siding with Russia</a>
&ldquo;These discussions are not easy, not least in the wake of this horrific violence. But we all support President Trump's push for peace,&rdquo; he said.
Rutte&rsquo;s comments come after Trump&rsquo;s special envoy Steve Witkoff said that he sees a peace deal &ldquo;emerging&rdquo; following talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
<h2>&lsquo;Acute need for air defence systems&rsquo;</h2>
Meanwhile, Zelensky told Rutte Ukraine is in urgent need of air defence systems after recent strikes by Russia that killed dozens of civilians in Sumy on Palm Sunday.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/putin-started-it-biden-blew-it-zelenskys-incompetent-trump-blames-three-people-for-millions-of-deaths-in-ukraine-war-8962151">&lsquo;Putin started it, Biden blew it, Zelensky's incompetent&rsquo;: Trump blames 'three people' for millions of deaths in Ukraine war</a>
&ldquo;Britain, France and other NATO countries are already actively preparing the ground for a security contingent in Ukraine. It is important that we all be fast enough and efficient in this process,&rdquo; he said.
&ldquo;Absolutely everyone sees how acute Ukraine&rsquo;s need for air defence systems and missiles is. We talked about this a lot today,&rdquo; the Ukrainian leader added.
Zelensky&rsquo;s comments come after recent Russian strikes that killed 35 people in the north-eastern Sumy region and 19 in his hometown of Kryvyi Rig.
Watch | Russia-Ukraine war: Trump blames Zelensky after Sumy attack, at least 35 killed in Sumy
<iframe width="600" height="auto" style="width: 100%; aspect-ratio: 4/3;" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" class="external-video publive-iframes-block" src="https://cdn.thepublive.com/wion/static/kaltura_player/wion_video_player_iframe.html?thumbnail=wion/media/post_attachments/screenshot/1504_WAR_730AM/00000002.jpg&amp;videourl=https://vodakm.zeenews.com/vod/WION/1504_WAR_730AM.mp4/index.m3u8&amp;duration=173&amp;tags=russia, ukraine, war, news, world news, international" title="Russia-Ukraine war: Trump blames Zelensky after Sumy attack, at least 35 killed in Sumy " id="PL_iframe_block-m9ioh4xo-dqgq56c5-mg7hqdsi"></iframe>
<h2>Zelensky-Rutte meet</h2>
Following their meeting in Odesa, Zelensky said that he &ldquo;discussed the security of Ukraine, our entire Europe, and the Euro-Atlantic region, as well as relations with all our partners in Europe and America&rdquo; with Rutte.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/i-just-got-here-trump-insists-russia-ukraine-war-not-his-war-slams-zelensky-biden-for-absolutely-horrible-job-8961927">&lsquo;I just got here&rsquo;: Trump insists Russia-Ukraine War &lsquo;not his war,&rsquo; slams Zelensky, Biden for &lsquo;absolutely horrible job&rsquo;</a>
&ldquo;The main focus was on strengthening Ukraine&rsquo;s air defense. Absolutely everyone sees how urgent Ukraine's need is for air defense systems and missiles for them,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;We are counting on the implementation of our agreements on air defense with partners in Europe and America. Patriot systems are defensive weapons, and we're not just asking for Patriots &mdash; we are ready to purchase them. This is a purely political matter &mdash; the systems are available in the world, the missiles for the Patriots are also available, and whether we will have sufficient protection from Russian ballistic strikes depends entirely on political decisions.&rdquo;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m9iofpaf-g0gnfgmg-im6ro7y2">
Today, <a href="https://twitter.com/SecGenNATO?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SecGenNATO</a> Mark Rutte is in Ukraine. We discussed the security of Ukraine, our entire Europe, and the Euro-Atlantic region, as well as relations with all our partners in Europe and America. The main focus was on strengthening Ukraine&rsquo;s air defense. Absolutely everyone&hellip; <a href="https://t.co/FWOBRCouci">pic.twitter.com/FWOBRCouci</a>
&mdash; Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1912152916082766085?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 15, 2025</a></blockquote>
He added, &ldquo;I am grateful to every leader who does not turn a blind eye to the reality &mdash; that lasting peace can only be achieved through determination. I am grateful to @SecGenNATO for the unwavering support for Ukraine since the earliest days of this war.&rdquo;
(WIth inputs from agencies)

Rutte’s comments come after Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff said that he sees a peace deal “emerging” following talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. World

NATO chief Mark Rutte said that talks on ceasefire and lasting peace in Ukraine, led by US President Donald Trump, were “not easy”. He also condemned Russia’s “terrible pattern” of attacks on Ukrainian civilians. Rutte met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky during a surprise visit to the port city of Odesa. Also read | 'Sort of absurd': Zelensky, Vance’s relationship hits new low; US VP hits back after Ukraine accuses US of siding with Russia “These discussions are not easy, not least in the wake of this horrific violence. But we all support President Trump's push for peace,” he said. Rutte’s comments come after Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff said that he sees a peace deal “emerging” following talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. ‘Acute need for air defence systems’ Meanwhile, Zelensky told Rutte Ukraine is in urgent need of air defence systems after recent strikes by Russia that killed dozens of civilians in Sumy on Palm Sunday. Also read | ‘Putin started it, Biden blew it, Zelensky's incompetent’: Trump blames 'three people' for millions of deaths in Ukraine war “Britain, France and other NATO countries are already actively preparing the ground for a security contingent in Ukraine. It is important that we all be fast enough and efficient in this process,” he said. “Absolutely everyone sees how acute Ukraine’s need for air defence systems and missiles is. We talked about this a lot today,” the Ukrainian leader added. Zelensky’s comments come after recent Russian strikes that killed 35 people in the north-eastern Sumy region and 19 in his hometown of Kryvyi Rig. Watch | Russia-Ukraine war: Trump blames Zelensky after Sumy attack, at least 35 killed in Sumy Zelensky-Rutte meet Following their meeting in Odesa, Zelensky said that he “discussed the security of Ukraine, our entire Europe, and the Euro-Atlantic region, as well as relations with all our partners in Europe and America” with Rutte. Also read | ‘I just got here’: Trump insists Russia-Ukraine War ‘not his war,’ slams Zelensky, Biden for ‘absolutely horrible job’ “The main focus was on strengthening Ukraine’s air defense. Absolutely everyone sees how urgent Ukraine's need is for air defense systems and missiles for them,” he said. “We are counting on the implementation of our agreements on air defense with partners in Europe and America. Patriot systems are defensive weapons, and we're not just asking for Patriots — we are ready to purchase them. This is a purely political matter — the systems are available in the world, the missiles for the Patriots are also available, and whether we will have sufficient protection from Russian ballistic strikes depends entirely on political decisions.” Today, @SecGenNATO Mark Rutte is in Ukraine. We discussed the security of Ukraine, our entire Europe, and the Euro-Atlantic region, as well as relations with all our partners in Europe and America. The main focus was on strengthening Ukraine’s air defense. Absolutely everyone… pic.twitter.com/FWOBRCouci — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) April 15, 2025 He added, “I am grateful to every leader who does not turn a blind eye to the reality — that lasting peace can only be achieved through determination. I am grateful to @SecGenNATO for the unwavering support for Ukraine since the earliest days of this war.” (WIth inputs from agencies)

US-led peace talks ‘not easy’: NATO chief Mark Rutte says during meeting with Zelensky in Odesa

NATO Chief Mark Rutte has warned that Russia is considering the deployment of nuclear weapons in space, and that it will be a threat to the thousands of satellites orbiting the Earth that are crucial for defence, communications, and the daily lives of people. In an interview with the German newspaper Welt am Sonntag, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte warned that the Russian nuclear weapons in space would not target Earth but may target satellites and would be a violation of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty.
&ldquo;We are aware of reports that Russia is examining the possibility of placing nuclear weapons in space,&rdquo; Rutte told Welt am Sonntag in an interview published on Saturday. Welt is a sister publication of POLITICO in the Axel Springer Group.
Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/post/8955829" rel="dofollow">Indian pharma warehouse in Ukraine hit by Russian missile: Ukrainian embassy</a>
&ldquo;Moscow&rsquo;s capabilities in space are outdated in comparison with the West. Therefore, the development of nuclear weapons in space is a way for Russia to improve its capabilities. This is very worrying,&rdquo; he added.
The weapons would not target Earth, but shooting down satellites could have serious ramifications, as several systems and services we are accustomed to using rely on satellites, including navigation and communication systems, as well as environmental monitoring. &ldquo;Space is also very important for our deterrence and defence&mdash;just as important as land, sea, air, and cyberspace,&rdquo; Rutte said.&nbsp; Rutte added that such a move by Russia would violate the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, signed by the United States and the Soviet Union at the time. The international agreement signed by 114 countries to prevent an arms race is still the framework of international space law and prohibits the deployment of weapons of mass destruction in space.
Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-state-of-georgia-introduces-bill-to-recognise-hinduphobia-and-anti-hindu-prejudice-8952805" target="_blank" rel="noopener">US' State of Georgia introduces bill to recognise Hinduphobia and anti-Hindu prejudice</a> Critics, however, point out that the treaty does not completely rule out military activities in space and may not address the dangers that emanate from modern satellite systems. &ldquo;NATO allies are adapting to the challenges in space, including sharing intelligence and establishing national space command centres, but also developing smaller satellites that are more manoeuvrable and better protected,&rdquo; he added.
Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-78-to-undergo-checkup-says-never-felt-better-will-his-reports-be-made-public-8951391" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Trump, 78, to undergo checkup, says &lsquo;never felt better&rsquo;; will his reports be made public?</a> &ldquo;In recent years, space has become increasingly crowded, dangerous, and unpredictable. We know that competition in space is fierce and becoming increasingly bitter. And not just in commercial terms. This affects our entire security,&rdquo; he said. With about 7,000 satellites currently orbiting Earth, &ldquo;space-based systems directly affect our way of life,&rdquo; said Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister. &ldquo;They ensure, for example, that mobile phones, banking services, and weather forecasts work.&rdquo;

World: “Space is also very important for our deterrence and defence—just as important as land, sea, air, and cyberspace,” NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said.

NATO Chief Mark Rutte has warned that Russia is considering the deployment of nuclear weapons in space, and that it will be a threat to the thousands of satellites orbiting the Earth that are crucial for defence, communications, and the daily lives of people. In an interview with the German newspaper Welt am Sonntag, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte warned that the Russian nuclear weapons in space would not target Earth but may target satellites and would be a violation of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. “We are aware of reports that Russia is examining the possibility of placing nuclear weapons in space,” Rutte told Welt am Sonntag in an interview published on Saturday. Welt is a sister publication of POLITICO in the Axel Springer Group. Also Read | Indian pharma warehouse in Ukraine hit by Russian missile: Ukrainian embassy “Moscow’s capabilities in space are outdated in comparison with the West. Therefore, the development of nuclear weapons in space is a way for Russia to improve its capabilities. This is very worrying,” he added. The weapons would not target Earth, but shooting down satellites could have serious ramifications, as several systems and services we are accustomed to using rely on satellites, including navigation and communication systems, as well as environmental monitoring. “Space is also very important for our deterrence and defence—just as important as land, sea, air, and cyberspace,” Rutte said. Rutte added that such a move by Russia would violate the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, signed by the United States and the Soviet Union at the time. The international agreement signed by 114 countries to prevent an arms race is still the framework of international space law and prohibits the deployment of weapons of mass destruction in space. Also Read | US' State of Georgia introduces bill to recognise Hinduphobia and anti-Hindu prejudice Critics, however, point out that the treaty does not completely rule out military activities in space and may not address the dangers that emanate from modern satellite systems. “NATO allies are adapting to the challenges in space, including sharing intelligence and establishing national space command centres, but also developing smaller satellites that are more manoeuvrable and better protected,” he added. Also Read | Trump, 78, to undergo checkup, says ‘never felt better’; will his reports be made public? “In recent years, space has become increasingly crowded, dangerous, and unpredictable. We know that competition in space is fierce and becoming increasingly bitter. And not just in commercial terms. This affects our entire security,” he said. With about 7,000 satellites currently orbiting Earth, “space-based systems directly affect our way of life,” said Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister. “They ensure, for example, that mobile phones, banking services, and weather forecasts work.”

Russia seeking to deploy nuclear weapons in space, warns NATO chief

In a significant diplomatic move, US special envoy Witkoff met Russian negotiator Dmitriev in Washington amid stalled Ukraine ceasefire talks. Dmitriev signaled a shift in Russia's stance, suggesting openness to limited security guarantees for Ukraine, while dismissing NATO membership. The visit marks the first high-level Russian trip to the US since the Ukraine invasion.

Russia strikes Zelensky's hometown, Ukrainian president says 'Putin doesn't want ceasefire'

New tariffs introduced by US President <a href="https://www.wionews.com/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> could pose a serious threat to the country&rsquo;s defence industry, potentially harming international military projects and pushing up the cost of producing weapons, Politico reported.
Trump announced a wide-reaching list of &ldquo;reciprocal tariffs&rdquo; on 2 April, setting a standard 10% duty on all countries with higher rates imposed on key partners like the European Union. 
<h2>How will new tariffs affect US weapon production?</h2>
The new tariffs could disrupt long-standing international defence cooperation, with experts warning that joint projects like the F-35 fighter jet, missile defence systems, and nuclear submarines could be affected.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/vietnam-first-to-fall-in-face-off-trump-tariffs-will-other-countries-follow-8926949" rel="dofollow noopener" target="_blank">Vietnam first to fall in face off Trump tariffs. Will other countries follow?</a>
The duties, which include a 20% levy on EU goods and 10% on imports from the UK and Australia, risk destabilising defence partnerships that have taken years to build.
The F-35 jet programme, which includes 20 nations and was designed to give partners a role in manufacturing, could face major delays. Other critical collaborations with countries such as Norway and Israel are also in question.
These projects are seen as vital for defence in Europe and the Indo-Pacific, particularly as tensions rise with Russia and China.&ldquo;There&rsquo;s going to be shortages of supplies, tit-for-tats, and our allies and other partners are going to retaliate,&rdquo; warned Bill Greenwalt, a former Pentagon acquisition official told Politico.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trump-says-its-a-great-time-to-get-rich-as-3-trillion-wiped-from-markets-after-tariffs-8926904" rel="dofollow noopener" target="_blank">&lsquo;My policies will never change&rsquo;: Trump says it&rsquo;s a &lsquo;great time to get rich&rsquo; as $3 trillion wiped from markets after tariffs</a>
&ldquo;Some potentially vital supplies are either going to cost a whole heck of a lot more than what they did, or they&rsquo;re just not going to be available,&rdquo; he added.
The US Department of Defense has spent decades creating a complex global supply chain for military manufacturing, much of which is now caught up in the new tariffs.
&ldquo;We count on the US for the best equipment,&rdquo; a European official told Politico. 
&ldquo;European industrial capacity has greatly improved, and we want to be security providers, not just consumers,&rdquo; the official added.
The official also said Europe may now invest more in local production to reduce reliance on US parts and materials.
US Senator Mark Kelly also raised concerns, saying, &ldquo;The prices are going to go up, and the prices that DOD has to pay are going to go up.&rdquo;
&ldquo;Our defence budget, if we want to maintain the same type of force, will get more expensive,&rdquo; he added.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/hands-off-protests-anti-trump-demonstrations-to-be-held-across-us-tomorrow-everything-you-need-to-know-8926838">'Hands Off' protests: Anti-Trump demonstrations to be held across US tomorrow | Everything you need to know</a>
(With inputs from agencies)

World: Trump announced a wide-reaching list of “reciprocal tariffs” on 2 April, setting a standard 10% duty on all countries with higher rates imposed on key partners like the European Union.

New tariffs introduced by US President Donald Trump could pose a serious threat to the country’s defence industry, potentially harming international military projects and pushing up the cost of producing weapons, Politico reported. Trump announced a wide-reaching list of “reciprocal tariffs” on 2 April, setting a standard 10% duty on all countries with higher rates imposed on key partners like the European Union. How will new tariffs affect US weapon production? The new tariffs could disrupt long-standing international defence cooperation, with experts warning that joint projects like the F-35 fighter jet, missile defence systems, and nuclear submarines could be affected. Also read: Vietnam first to fall in face off Trump tariffs. Will other countries follow? The duties, which include a 20% levy on EU goods and 10% on imports from the UK and Australia, risk destabilising defence partnerships that have taken years to build. The F-35 jet programme, which includes 20 nations and was designed to give partners a role in manufacturing, could face major delays. Other critical collaborations with countries such as Norway and Israel are also in question. These projects are seen as vital for defence in Europe and the Indo-Pacific, particularly as tensions rise with Russia and China.“There’s going to be shortages of supplies, tit-for-tats, and our allies and other partners are going to retaliate,” warned Bill Greenwalt, a former Pentagon acquisition official told Politico. Also read: ‘My policies will never change’: Trump says it’s a ‘great time to get rich’ as $3 trillion wiped from markets after tariffs “Some potentially vital supplies are either going to cost a whole heck of a lot more than what they did, or they’re just not going to be available,” he added. The US Department of Defense has spent decades creating a complex global supply chain for military manufacturing, much of which is now caught up in the new tariffs. “We count on the US for the best equipment,” a European official told Politico. “European industrial capacity has greatly improved, and we want to be security providers, not just consumers,” the official added. The official also said Europe may now invest more in local production to reduce reliance on US parts and materials. US Senator Mark Kelly also raised concerns, saying, “The prices are going to go up, and the prices that DOD has to pay are going to go up.” “Our defence budget, if we want to maintain the same type of force, will get more expensive,” he added. Also read: 'Hands Off' protests: Anti-Trump demonstrations to be held across US tomorrow | Everything you need to know (With inputs from agencies)

'Pentagon will pay': Did Trump shoot US weapon production in foot with reciprocal tariffs? F-35, NATO partnerships at risk

NATO is holding its largest-ever air defense exercise, "Joint Project Optic Windmill," bringing together 15 nations and 700 soldiers. With Sweden and Finland participating for the first time, the drills test NATO's response to missile and drone attacks.

NATO members come together for 'joint project optic windmill'

NATO conducts largest air defense drills in Europe’s history

In response to perceived threats from Russia, Poland is considering transforming its eastern border with NATO into a minefield, marking its withdrawal from the Ottawa Convention banning anti-personnel landmines.

Russia fear drives Poland to plan minefield along NATO's eastern border

The Trump administration is planning to give up the role of NATO command, a responsibility the United States has held for nearly 75 years. According to NBC News, which cites two US defense officials familiar with the planning, the Pentagon is undertaking a major overhaul of the US military's combatant commands and headquarters.

US defence officials familiar with NATO command plan: Reports

US to abandon NATO command it held for 75 years?

NATO Chief Mark Rutte heads to the White House for a crucial meeting with President Trump as the alliance faces questions about its relevance. With Trump holding the key to US commitment, Rutte must prove that NATO remains effective and necessary. Watch this report for more update!

NATO chief Mark Rutte meets Trump as alliance struggles to stay relevant

#Gravitas Kursk has fallen back into Russian hands, leading Ukraine to dismiss a top military commander as international pressure for a ceasefire intensifies.

Kursk falls to Russia, Ukraine sacks defeated general amid calls for ceasefire

US President Trump has issued a warning to Russia as the country remains tight-lipped on the proposed ceasefire with Ukraine. Watch in for more details!

Trump issues warning to Russia over Ukraine ceasefire agreement

Elon Musk has pressed for the United States' withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), questioning the logic of America shouldering the cost of Europe's defence.
He said that it &ldquo;doesn&rsquo;t make sense for America to pay for the defence of Europe.&rdquo;
Musk, who co-chairs the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), said this in response to a post on X that advocated for the United States to &ldquo;Exit NATO *now*!&rdquo;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m81klp1e-7qto136g-dd0fodt2">
We really should. Doesn&rsquo;t make sense for America to pay for the defense of Europe. <a href="https://t.co/jXs6yNA8Re">https://t.co/jXs6yNA8Re</a>
&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1898601328722489362?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2025</a></blockquote>
This is not the first time the billionaire has called for the US' exit from NATO.
<h2>'I agree'</h2>
Earlier, on March 2, Musk retweeted a social media post by a user that said "it's time" for the United States "to leave NATO and the UN," by replying "I agree", publicly expressing support for the United States withdrawing from the United Nations (UN) and NATO.
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jd-vance-laments-trumps-lengthy-congress-speech-in-caught-on-mic-moment-watch-8794039">Also read: Trump speech: JD Vance laments US president's lengthy Congress speech in hot mic moment | WATCH</a>
This comes after Senator Mike Lee introduced the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act of 2025 in February.
It aims to terminate US membership in the UN and its affiliated organisations, while also cutting off funding to these groups.&nbsp;
In addition, it also intends to revoke the agreement that permits the UN to keep its headquarters in New York and remove diplomatic immunity for UN employees in the United States.
Lee, while speaking to Fox News Digital, had said that the UN had descended into a &ldquo;platform for tyrants and a venue to attack America and her allies&rdquo;.&nbsp;
&ldquo;As President Trump revolutionizes our foreign policy by putting America first, we should withdraw from this sham organization and prioritize real alliances that keep our country safe and prosperous,&rdquo; he said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m81km4p9-aaeiflmb-surcva2y">
I agree <a href="https://t.co/ZhjBXCTQfp">https://t.co/ZhjBXCTQfp</a>
&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1896026564019830820?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
The United States is the largest financial contributor to the United Nations, accounting for a significant portion of the organisation's budget. In 2022, the US provided over $18 billion in funding.
US President Donald Trump has, in several instances, expressed his dissatisfaction with NATO operations.
He had issued a warning even before his elections that the United States might pull out of the North Atlantic Alliance unless European partners bore greater financial responsibility for their own security.
(With inputs from agencies)

World: Earlier, on March 2, retweeted a social media post by a user that said "it's time" for the United States "to leave NATO and the UN," by replying, "I agree".

Elon Musk has pressed for the United States' withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), questioning the logic of America shouldering the cost of Europe's defence. He said that it “doesn’t make sense for America to pay for the defence of Europe.” Musk, who co-chairs the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), said this in response to a post on X that advocated for the United States to “Exit NATO *now*!” We really should. Doesn’t make sense for America to pay for the defense of Europe. https://t.co/jXs6yNA8Re — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 9, 2025 This is not the first time the billionaire has called for the US' exit from NATO. 'I agree' Earlier, on March 2, Musk retweeted a social media post by a user that said "it's time" for the United States "to leave NATO and the UN," by replying "I agree", publicly expressing support for the United States withdrawing from the United Nations (UN) and NATO. Also read: Trump speech: JD Vance laments US president's lengthy Congress speech in hot mic moment | WATCH This comes after Senator Mike Lee introduced the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act of 2025 in February. It aims to terminate US membership in the UN and its affiliated organisations, while also cutting off funding to these groups. In addition, it also intends to revoke the agreement that permits the UN to keep its headquarters in New York and remove diplomatic immunity for UN employees in the United States. Lee, while speaking to Fox News Digital, had said that the UN had descended into a “platform for tyrants and a venue to attack America and her allies”. “As President Trump revolutionizes our foreign policy by putting America first, we should withdraw from this sham organization and prioritize real alliances that keep our country safe and prosperous,” he said. I agree https://t.co/ZhjBXCTQfp — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 2, 2025 The United States is the largest financial contributor to the United Nations, accounting for a significant portion of the organisation's budget. In 2022, the US provided over $18 billion in funding. US President Donald Trump has, in several instances, expressed his dissatisfaction with NATO operations. He had issued a warning even before his elections that the United States might pull out of the North Atlantic Alliance unless European partners bore greater financial responsibility for their own security. (With inputs from agencies)

Elon Musk pushes for US to exit NATO; 'Doesn’t make sense...'

Reports suggest the US may not participate in future NATO drills beyond those already scheduled, signaling a potential shift in its commitment to the alliance. Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized NATO members for not contributing enough to defense spending.

Reportedly US won't participate in exercises beyond those already scheduled

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni suggested that NATO could extend its Article 5 projections to Ukraine without making it a member of the alliance.&nbsp;
Meloni on March 6 (Thursday) made the proposal for the North Atlantic Alliance, during the sidelines of the EU leaders' emergency Summit in Brussels.
Notably, Article 5 states that an attack on any NATO member would be treated like an attack on all of them.&nbsp;
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ukrainians-built-up-trust-zelenskys-approval-rating-surges-to-68-per-cent-after-showdown-with-trump-8831282">Ukrainians built up trust: Zelensky's approval rating surges to 68 per cent after showdown with Trump</a>
"We need to think about more durable solutions than just sending European peacekeepers to Ukraine," Meloni said.&nbsp;
"Extending the same coverage that NATO countries have to Ukraine would certainly be much more effective while being something different from NATO's membership," the Italian PM said at a press briefing in Brussels.&nbsp;
"It&rsquo;s a different thing than entering NATO, but it implies extending the coverage that NATO countries have also to Ukraine," she added.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-ukraine-to-hold-meeting-next-week-zelensky-announces-after-eu-emergency-summit-in-brussels-8828965">US, Ukraine likely to hold meeting next week, Zelensky announces after EU Emergency Summit in Brussels</a>
She further said that it would be a "stable, lasting, effective security guarantee, more than some of the proposals I'm seeing."&nbsp;
Moreover, when asked about how Europe might provide security guarantees to Ukraine without a US backdrop, both European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen dodged specifics and shifted to praising the Ukrainian military.
"The best security guarantee is the Ukrainians themselves," Costa said, stressing that Ukraine has been fighting the war for over three years.&nbsp;
<h2>Kyiv seeks more information&nbsp;</h2>
Ukraine has asked Italy for more information about the proposal made by Meloni.&nbsp;
Kyiv is seeking security guarantees from its Western allies ahead of any peace talks with Russia. It has been wanting NATO membership, but US President Donald Trump rejected this.&nbsp;
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/eu-emergency-summit-live-great-we-are-not-alone-zelensky-says-as-he-arrives-at-summit-8827857">Emergency Summit HIGHLIGHTS: 'Conflict will unavoidably resume', Russia warns EU as leaders hold summit</a>
Meanwhile, as discussed in yesterday's Summit, the European countries are developing a "coalition of the willing" to monitor a potential ceasefire in Ukraine.&nbsp;
Further, countries including Canada, Australia, and Ireland have shown openness to partake in such a mission.
Notably, Ukraine has wanted to join NATO for long and it has been a highly contentious subject. Russia could be angered by any moves to extend the alliance's support to Kyiv.&nbsp;
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/european-leaders-rally-around-ukraine-commit-to-866-billion-defence-plan-8830122">European leaders rally around Ukraine, commit to $866 billion defence plan</a>
(With inputs from agencies)

World: Meloni on March 6 (Thursday) made the proposal for the North Atlantic Alliance, during the sidelines of the EU leaders' emergency Summit in Brussels.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni suggested that NATO could extend its Article 5 projections to Ukraine without making it a member of the alliance. Meloni on March 6 (Thursday) made the proposal for the North Atlantic Alliance, during the sidelines of the EU leaders' emergency Summit in Brussels. Notably, Article 5 states that an attack on any NATO member would be treated like an attack on all of them. Also read: Ukrainians built up trust: Zelensky's approval rating surges to 68 per cent after showdown with Trump "We need to think about more durable solutions than just sending European peacekeepers to Ukraine," Meloni said. "Extending the same coverage that NATO countries have to Ukraine would certainly be much more effective while being something different from NATO's membership," the Italian PM said at a press briefing in Brussels. "It’s a different thing than entering NATO, but it implies extending the coverage that NATO countries have also to Ukraine," she added. Also read: US, Ukraine likely to hold meeting next week, Zelensky announces after EU Emergency Summit in Brussels She further said that it would be a "stable, lasting, effective security guarantee, more than some of the proposals I'm seeing." Moreover, when asked about how Europe might provide security guarantees to Ukraine without a US backdrop, both European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen dodged specifics and shifted to praising the Ukrainian military. "The best security guarantee is the Ukrainians themselves," Costa said, stressing that Ukraine has been fighting the war for over three years. Kyiv seeks more information Ukraine has asked Italy for more information about the proposal made by Meloni. Kyiv is seeking security guarantees from its Western allies ahead of any peace talks with Russia. It has been wanting NATO membership, but US President Donald Trump rejected this. Also read: Emergency Summit HIGHLIGHTS: 'Conflict will unavoidably resume', Russia warns EU as leaders hold summit Meanwhile, as discussed in yesterday's Summit, the European countries are developing a "coalition of the willing" to monitor a potential ceasefire in Ukraine. Further, countries including Canada, Australia, and Ireland have shown openness to partake in such a mission. Notably, Ukraine has wanted to join NATO for long and it has been a highly contentious subject. Russia could be angered by any moves to extend the alliance's support to Kyiv. Also read: European leaders rally around Ukraine, commit to $866 billion defence plan (With inputs from agencies)

Italy's Meloni suggests taking Ukraine under NATO's security umbrella without providing membership

Tensions rise as reports suggest the US is losing confidence in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. With Trump considering halting military aid and European allies struggling to mediate, Ukraine’s leadership faces growing pressure. Can Zelensky navigate these geopolitical challenges, or is change inevitable?

Can Europe repair a split between the US and Ukraine?

Elon Musk, the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), publicly expressed support for the United States withdrawing from the United Nations (UN) and NATO.
Musk retweeted a social media post by a user that said "it's time" for the United States "to leave NATO and the UN," by replying "I agree".
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m7rnilok-avwl90vw-2c8rc9q7">
I agree <a href="https://t.co/ZhjBXCTQfp">https://t.co/ZhjBXCTQfp</a>
&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1896026564019830820?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
This comes after Senator Mike Lee introduced the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act of 2025 in the month of February.
It aims to terminate US membership in the UN and its affiliated organisations, while also cutting off funding to these groups.&nbsp;
In addition, it also intends to revoke the agreement that permits the UN to keep its headquarters in New York and remove diplomatic immunity for UN employees in the United States.
Lee, while speaking to Fox News Digital, had said that the UN had descended into a &ldquo;platform for tyrants and a venue to attack America and her allies&rdquo;.&nbsp;
&ldquo;As President Trump revolutionizes our foreign policy by putting America first, we should withdraw from this sham organization and prioritize real alliances that keep our country safe and prosperous,&rdquo; he said.
The United States is the largest financial contributor to the United Nations, accounting for a significant portion of the organisation's budget. In 2022, the US provided over $18 billion in funding.
US President Donald Trump has, in several instances, expressed his dissatisfaction with the operations of NATO.
He had issued a warning even before his elections that the United States might pull out of the North Atlantic Alliance unless European partners bore greater financial responsibility for their own security.
(With inputs from agencies)

World news: US President Donald Trump has during several instances expressed his dissatisfaction with the operations of NATO. He had issued a warning even before his elections that the United States might pull out of the North Atlantic Alliance.

Elon Musk, the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), publicly expressed support for the United States withdrawing from the United Nations (UN) and NATO. Musk retweeted a social media post by a user that said "it's time" for the United States "to leave NATO and the UN," by replying "I agree". I agree https://t.co/ZhjBXCTQfp — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 2, 2025 This comes after Senator Mike Lee introduced the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act of 2025 in the month of February. It aims to terminate US membership in the UN and its affiliated organisations, while also cutting off funding to these groups. In addition, it also intends to revoke the agreement that permits the UN to keep its headquarters in New York and remove diplomatic immunity for UN employees in the United States. Lee, while speaking to Fox News Digital, had said that the UN had descended into a “platform for tyrants and a venue to attack America and her allies”. “As President Trump revolutionizes our foreign policy by putting America first, we should withdraw from this sham organization and prioritize real alliances that keep our country safe and prosperous,” he said. The United States is the largest financial contributor to the United Nations, accounting for a significant portion of the organisation's budget. In 2022, the US provided over $18 billion in funding. US President Donald Trump has, in several instances, expressed his dissatisfaction with the operations of NATO. He had issued a warning even before his elections that the United States might pull out of the North Atlantic Alliance unless European partners bore greater financial responsibility for their own security. (With inputs from agencies)

Elon Musk publicly supports US withdrawal from UN and NATO

Day after US President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky got into a fiery conversation at the Oval Office, world leaders started extending support to Zelensky, saying that "You are not alone."
However, on Saturday (March 1), Poland President Andrzeg Duda said that the Ukrainian president should "get back to the negotiation table".&nbsp;
He added, "He can see no other power in the world than the US that could stop Russian aggression on Ukraine."
Earlier, the Polish Prime Minister and former president of the European Council Donald Tusk said, "dear Ukrainian friends, you are not alone".
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/got-a-proper-slap-at-oval-office-russia-calls-trump-zelensky-shouting-match-historic-8766873">'Got a proper slap': Russia calls Trump, Zelensky shouting match 'historic'; Europe united behind Ukraine</a>
<h2>'Must restore relations'</h2>
Meanwhile, NATO Chief Mark Rutte said Zelensky must restore relations with Trump and the US.&nbsp;
"You have to find a way, dear Volodymyr, to restore your relationship with Donald Trump and the American administration," Rutte said.&nbsp;
"Not at liberty to say what was disclosed", Rutte further said. However, he shared that he told Zelensky "we have to respect" what Trump has done for Ukraine so far.&nbsp;
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-tried-to-use-zelensky-against-biden-but-it-backfired-what-fueled-his-anger-towards-terrible-ukraine-8769285">Trump tried to use Zelensky against Biden but&nbsp;it&nbsp;backfired&nbsp;-&nbsp;What fueled his anger towards 'terrible'&nbsp;Ukraine</a>
He added that during Trump's first administration - from 2017 to 2020 - the US approved the sale of the Javelin anti-tank missile system which enabled Ukraine to "fight back" when Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022.
"We really have to give Trump credit," Rutte said.
The NATO chief further said that he is &ldquo;friends&rdquo; with Trump and knows he is &ldquo;committed&rdquo; to bringing peace to Kyiv.
Right after the meeting with Trump on Friday, Zelensky immediately held a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, followed by a call with the NATO chief.&nbsp;
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-has-stolen-our-content-gaza-ai-video-creators-accuse-us-prez-says-no-idea-how-it-reached-white-house-8769417">'Trump has stolen our content': Gaza AI video creators accuse US prez, says no idea how it reached White House</a>
Meanwhile Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico reiterated that his country would not support Ukraine either militarily or financially to continue the war against Russia.&nbsp;
"Ukraine will never be strong enough to negotiate from a position of military strength," he said.&nbsp;
Meanwhile, Germany's foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said that the "unspeakable" row between Trump and Zelensky has "underlined that a new age of infamy has begun".
She added, "Sadly, this was not a bad dream, but a heavy reality."
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-china-want-to-hire-federal-employees-elon-musk-doge-us-president-donald-trumps-cost-cutting-efforts-8768824">'Bitter, out of job': Russia, China want to hire federal employees laid off under Trump's cost-cutting&nbsp;efforts</a>
Norway Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store said that his government will ask parliament to &nbsp;increase its economic support to Ukraine.
It is "crucial", he said, adding that the US contributes with Europe to a "lasting peace".
(With inputs from agencies)

World: Yesterday, Polish Prime Minister and former president of the European Council Donald Tusk said, "dear Ukrainian friends, you are not alone".

Day after US President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky got into a fiery conversation at the Oval Office, world leaders started extending support to Zelensky, saying that "You are not alone." However, on Saturday (March 1), Poland President Andrzeg Duda said that the Ukrainian president should "get back to the negotiation table". He added, "He can see no other power in the world than the US that could stop Russian aggression on Ukraine." Earlier, the Polish Prime Minister and former president of the European Council Donald Tusk said, "dear Ukrainian friends, you are not alone". Also read: 'Got a proper slap': Russia calls Trump, Zelensky shouting match 'historic'; Europe united behind Ukraine 'Must restore relations' Meanwhile, NATO Chief Mark Rutte said Zelensky must restore relations with Trump and the US. "You have to find a way, dear Volodymyr, to restore your relationship with Donald Trump and the American administration," Rutte said. "Not at liberty to say what was disclosed", Rutte further said. However, he shared that he told Zelensky "we have to respect" what Trump has done for Ukraine so far. Also read: Trump tried to use Zelensky against Biden but it backfired - What fueled his anger towards 'terrible' Ukraine He added that during Trump's first administration - from 2017 to 2020 - the US approved the sale of the Javelin anti-tank missile system which enabled Ukraine to "fight back" when Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. "We really have to give Trump credit," Rutte said. The NATO chief further said that he is “friends” with Trump and knows he is “committed” to bringing peace to Kyiv. Right after the meeting with Trump on Friday, Zelensky immediately held a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, followed by a call with the NATO chief. Also read: 'Trump has stolen our content': Gaza AI video creators accuse US prez, says no idea how it reached White House Meanwhile Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico reiterated that his country would not support Ukraine either militarily or financially to continue the war against Russia. "Ukraine will never be strong enough to negotiate from a position of military strength," he said. Meanwhile, Germany's foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said that the "unspeakable" row between Trump and Zelensky has "underlined that a new age of infamy has begun". She added, "Sadly, this was not a bad dream, but a heavy reality." Also read: 'Bitter, out of job': Russia, China want to hire federal employees laid off under Trump's cost-cutting efforts Norway Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store said that his government will ask parliament to increase its economic support to Ukraine. It is "crucial", he said, adding that the US contributes with Europe to a "lasting peace". (With inputs from agencies)

With Zelensky but not against Trump: EU, NATO stress Ukraine's need to 'restore' relations with US

nato

Nato, News on Nato, stories on Nato, articles on Nato, Nato stories at Wion, Nato news, Nato latest news

nato

Is OTAN NATO written backwards? Not really! Here's why both words are seen on defence bloc's sign

'The daddy thing, I didn't...': Embarrassed NATO chief Rutte does an about-turn

VIDEO: Ukrainian journalist holds back tears as Trump comforts her

Top 10 world news: NATO Summit updates; Trump-Zelensky meet, and more

UK to acquire F-35A jets from US, revive airborne nuclear capability

What is NATO’s new 5% defence spending goal and who is against it?

Is China planning to invade Taiwan? NATO raises alarm over military buildup

Did US use B-2 bomber to drop depleted uranium in Kosovo War?

Not a 'threat'? Putin downplays NATO rearmament push

Canada to reach 2% defence NATO spending target this year, says Prime Minister Carney

NATO chief calls for 400% increase in alliance’s air defence, citing threat from Russia

Dutch government collapses after far-right leader Wilders exits coalition

Ukraine invited to NATO summit in The Hague: Zelensky

Ukraine invited to NATO summit in The Hague: Zelensky

US-led peace talks ‘not easy’: NATO chief Mark Rutte says during meeting with Zelensky in Odesa

Russia seeking to deploy nuclear weapons in space, warns NATO chief

Russia strikes Zelensky's hometown, Ukrainian president says 'Putin doesn't want ceasefire'

'Pentagon will pay': Did Trump shoot US weapon production in foot with reciprocal tariffs? F-35, NATO partnerships at risk

NATO members come together for 'joint project optic windmill'

NATO conducts largest air defense drills in Europe’s history

Russia fear drives Poland to plan minefield along NATO's eastern border

US defence officials familiar with NATO command plan: Reports

US to abandon NATO command it held for 75 years?

NATO chief Mark Rutte meets Trump as alliance struggles to stay relevant