The first country in South Asia to legalise same-sex marriage, Nepal has recently introduced measures ranging from regulatory changes to Pink Tourism.

Nepal's government launches nationwide pink-tourism initiative; to boost its LGBTQ traveler base

Russian court&nbsp;has&nbsp;handed down the first conviction&nbsp;since Moscow&nbsp;banned the “international LGBT movement” late last year. As of Thursday (Feb 1), there were three reported cases concerning the&nbsp;particular ban across multiple Russian cities.&nbsp;

<h2>‘Out of stupidity’</h2>

On Thursday (Feb 1), a court in the southern region of Volgograd found a man guilty of “displaying the symbols of an extremist organisation” after he posted an image of the LGBT flag online, reported Reuters citing the court’s press service.

Artyom P&nbsp;was ordered to pay a fine of $11 (1,000 rubles) after he admitted guilt and repented, saying he had posted the image “out of stupidity,” as per the news agency.&nbsp;

<h2>Woman detained</h2>

Last week, a court in the Russian city of Nizhny Novgorod sentenced a woman to five days in administrative detention based on the recently passed law.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-imposes-ban-on-international-lgbt-movement-claims-it-to-be-extremist-group-664803">Russia imposes ban on 'international LGBT movement', terming it 'extremist group'</a>

A report by The Moscow Times, on Thursday (Feb 1) citing human rights group Egida said that a woman was jailed for wearing rainbow earrings. The woman was identified as Anastasia Yershova in court documents.

According to the report, the police tasked with combating “extremism” detained the woman after a group of “aggressive people” approached Yershova and her friend at a local cafe and filmed them.&nbsp;

The woman was called to the police station after the man who had filmed the incident posted it online.&nbsp;

The video was also shared by ultra-conservative bloggers, according to The Moscow Times and showed the unidentified man threatening to hand them over to the police for wearing a Ukrainian flag pin and rainbow earrings.

As per court documents, Yershova was questioned by police and then brought before a judge who cited the ruling handed down by the Russian Supreme Court in Moscow on November 30.&nbsp;

At the time, the apex court judge ruled that “the international LGBT public movement and its subdivisions” were extremist, and issued a “ban on its activities on the territory of Russia”. The ban took effect immediately.&nbsp;

<h2>'Creative solutions'</h2>

Additionally, a trial against a photographer in Saratov in southwestern will also resume next week after she allegedly posted images of rainbow flags on Instagram, reported independent Russian news outlet Mediazona.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-takes-steps-to-make-foreigners-sign-a-loyalty-agreement-664324">Russia takes steps to make foreigners sign a 'loyalty agreement'</a>

The woman who was reportedly identified as 33-year-old photographer Inna Mosina, went to trial on Tuesday (Jan 30) and denied the charges against her.&nbsp;

According to The Moscow Times, the rainbow flag was posted on her Instagram page a month before the Supreme Court ruling went into force.

On Tuesday, during the hearing, she told the Leninsky District Court that the rainbow flags on her Instagram page are “creative solutions” and do not represent LGBTQ+ symbols, reported Mediazona.

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

Russian court has handed down the first conviction since Moscow banned the “international LGBT movement” late last year. As of Thursday (Feb 1), there were three reported cases concerning the particular ban across multiple Russian cities.

Russian court has handed down the first conviction since Moscow banned the “international LGBT movement” late last year. As of Thursday (Feb 1), there were three reported cases concerning the particular ban across multiple Russian cities. ‘Out of stupidity’ On Thursday (Feb 1), a court in the southern region of Volgograd found a man guilty of “displaying the symbols of an extremist organisation” after he posted an image of the LGBT flag online, reported Reuters citing the court’s press service. Artyom P was ordered to pay a fine of $11 (1,000 rubles) after he admitted guilt and repented, saying he had posted the image “out of stupidity,” as per the news agency. Woman detained Last week, a court in the Russian city of Nizhny Novgorod sentenced a woman to five days in administrative detention based on the recently passed law. ALSO READ | Russia imposes ban on 'international LGBT movement', terming it 'extremist group' A report by The Moscow Times, on Thursday (Feb 1) citing human rights group Egida said that a woman was jailed for wearing rainbow earrings. The woman was identified as Anastasia Yershova in court documents. According to the report, the police tasked with combating “extremism” detained the woman after a group of “aggressive people” approached Yershova and her friend at a local cafe and filmed them. The woman was called to the police station after the man who had filmed the incident posted it online. The video was also shared by ultra-conservative bloggers, according to The Moscow Times and showed the unidentified man threatening to hand them over to the police for wearing a Ukrainian flag pin and rainbow earrings. As per court documents, Yershova was questioned by police and then brought before a judge who cited the ruling handed down by the Russian Supreme Court in Moscow on November 30. At the time, the apex court judge ruled that “the international LGBT public movement and its subdivisions” were extremist, and issued a “ban on its activities on the territory of Russia”. The ban took effect immediately. 'Creative solutions' Additionally, a trial against a photographer in Saratov in southwestern will also resume next week after she allegedly posted images of rainbow flags on Instagram, reported independent Russian news outlet Mediazona. ALSO READ | Russia takes steps to make foreigners sign a 'loyalty agreement' The woman who was reportedly identified as 33-year-old photographer Inna Mosina, went to trial on Tuesday (Jan 30) and denied the charges against her. According to The Moscow Times, the rainbow flag was posted on her Instagram page a month before the Supreme Court ruling went into force. On Tuesday, during the hearing, she told the Leninsky District Court that the rainbow flags on her Instagram page are “creative solutions” and do not represent LGBTQ+ symbols, reported Mediazona. (With inputs from agencies)

Russia makes arrests, convicts several people for ‘LGBT extremism’ since ban

A New York Times op-ed on Taylor Swift has drawn flak from her fans. The op-ed analyses her musical and lyrical choices through a queer lens and hints at her potential queer&nbsp;identity. The article has received mixed reactions. Critics have stated that the article goes too far and indulges in unnecessary speculations about her personal life. This raises questions about what's acceptable when talking about public figures. 
 
The op-ed that ‘extensively analysed’ the gender identity of the singer angered her fan base. 
 
The author of the 5,000-word piece has stated that Taylor Swift has hinted at her gender identity throughout her musical career. The lengthy opinion piece, which was published on Thursday, features several items that the author feels are "evidence" that the singer is a member of the LGBTQIA+ group. 
 
An excerpt of the piece reads, “Those dropped hairpins began to appear in Ms. Swift’s artistry long before queer identity was undeniably marketable to mainstream America. They suggest to queer people that she is one of us.”

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-besties-reunite-taylor-swift-selena-gomez-pose-together-at-the-golden-globes-677614">Besties reunite! Taylor Swift, Selena Gomez pose together at the Golden Globes</a> 
 
Reacting to the op-ed, a fan of the singer wrote on social media, “let alone a figure of immense cultural significance who has previously denied the insinuations. Such pieces are widely considered to be inappropriate." 
 
Another one said, “I find myself hoping her machine punishes those who did this And I suspect she could do it, either overtly or subtly.” 
 
Swift's support for the LGBTQ community 
 
In the past, Taylor Swift has shown support for the LGBTQ community and said her performances are a “safe space" for LGBTQ people. She has also been a support to her Queer fans when anti-gay measures were being taken in the US. However, she has denied being part of the community herself. In a 2019 interview, Swift said, "Rights are being stripped from basically everyone who isn’t a straight white cisgender male.” She further added, “I didn’t realise until recently that I could advocate for a community that I’m not a part of.”

The singer is at present in a relationship with NFL star Travis Kelce. While the duo has not openly confirmed their relationship, they have indulged in PDA during public outings in recent months.&nbsp;

A New York Times op-ed on Taylor Swift has drawn flak from her fans. The op-ed analyses her musical and lyrical choices through a queer lens and hints at her potential queer identity.

A New York Times op-ed on Taylor Swift has drawn flak from her fans. The op-ed analyses her musical and lyrical choices through a queer lens and hints at her potential queer identity. The article has received mixed reactions. Critics have stated that the article goes too far and indulges in unnecessary speculations about her personal life. This raises questions about what's acceptable when talking about public figures. The op-ed that ‘extensively analysed’ the gender identity of the singer angered her fan base. The author of the 5,000-word piece has stated that Taylor Swift has hinted at her gender identity throughout her musical career. The lengthy opinion piece, which was published on Thursday, features several items that the author feels are "evidence" that the singer is a member of the LGBTQIA+ group. An excerpt of the piece reads, “Those dropped hairpins began to appear in Ms. Swift’s artistry long before queer identity was undeniably marketable to mainstream America. They suggest to queer people that she is one of us.” Besties reunite! Taylor Swift, Selena Gomez pose together at the Golden Globes Reacting to the op-ed, a fan of the singer wrote on social media, “let alone a figure of immense cultural significance who has previously denied the insinuations. Such pieces are widely considered to be inappropriate." Another one said, “I find myself hoping her machine punishes those who did this And I suspect she could do it, either overtly or subtly.” Swift's support for the LGBTQ community In the past, Taylor Swift has shown support for the LGBTQ community and said her performances are a “safe space" for LGBTQ people. She has also been a support to her Queer fans when anti-gay measures were being taken in the US. However, she has denied being part of the community herself. In a 2019 interview, Swift said, "Rights are being stripped from basically everyone who isn’t a straight white cisgender male.” She further added, “I didn’t realise until recently that I could advocate for a community that I’m not a part of.” The singer is at present in a relationship with NFL star Travis Kelce. While the duo has not openly confirmed their relationship, they have indulged in PDA during public outings in recent months.

Taylor Swift's fans enraged by an op-ed that hints at the singer's queer identity 

“…I can assure you that my four-year-old and my two-year-old daughters will not change (their clothes) in front of biological men. This is ridiculous,” the US Representative for Texas Wesley Hunt angrily said on July 27, 2023, as he torched the idea of gender-affirming care.

“…I can assure you that my four-year-old and my two-year-old daughters will not change (their clothes) in front of biological men. This is ridiculous,” the US Representative for Texas Wesley Hunt angrily said on July 27, 2023, as he torched the idea of gender-affirming care. The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government was hearing testimony from former female college swimmer Paula Scanlan — who was forced to compete alongside a trans-identifying male. Also read: China contributes to global increase in mpox cases as LGBTQ+ stigma affects response “If you think that we are all equal and the same biologically, you’ve literally lost your mind. And when my two daughters work hard in a sport, work hard in their craft to be the best that they can be, amongst other women, they will compete against other women,” Representative Hunt said. Congressman Hunt takes a Flamethrower 🔥🔥🔥 to “gender affirming care.” We MUST do everything we can to protect our children and we owe future generations of young women all the protection they deserve. pic.twitter.com/adUwH2fK78 — Rep. Wesley Hunt Press Office (@RepWPH) July 27, 2023 × He pointed out that when it came to gender dysphoria in children, many in the American medical establishment had “absolutely lost their mind.” The LGBTQ movement is not new and has been around for decades. But over the years, there has been an attempt to impose the movement’s ideologies onto people, especially in the education system. The efforts to appease the community in recent years have caused significant damage, especially to children and parents. Here’s a look at what has happened this year: Parents fume over LGBTQ teaching at school This year, there have been multiple protests by parents against the LGBTQ curriculum in schools in Western countries. In early July, around 100 parents gathered for a protest at Birchfields Primary School in Manchester, United Kingdom (UK), the BBC reported. They held signs which said “Stop sexualising our children,” and “Too much too soon.” The following month, about 150 protesters marched from the City Hall to the Los Angeles Unified School District headquarters on Aug 21, a report by the LA Times said. The protesters included parents whose children were studying at Saticoy Elementary, where fighting broke out between opposing sides during a protest over Gay Pride activity in June. In this case, the two main demands were placed. First - a discussion about the LGBTQ+ community and sex-related education be kept out of schools. Second- school districts notify parents if their children are asked to identify in school in a manner different than the gender assigned to them at birth. In January, American media highlighted a few cases where school students changed their gender identity and their parents were completely unaware. They argued that the school administration should have sought their permission or at least told them. Also read: To marry or not to marry: An analysis of Indian Supreme Court's same-sex marriage judgment In late September, thousands of people in Canada rallied across the country, expressing concerns about how LGBTQ+ issues were handled in schools, CBC Kids News reported. They were opposing how schools were addressing sexual orientation and gender. The protesters pointed out that parents should be responsible for deciding when their children should be exposed to LGBTQ+ teaching. These protests were met with counter-protesters who said such kind of education was essential and schools should be safe places for children to explore gender. Social media, LGBTQ 'propaganda', and the dangers Social media is a dangerous place if not explored carefully. The most potential victims of social media-related crimes are children who explore this part of the internet with little to no supervision from parents at times. A study conducted by the MARA Technological University in Malaysia in 2019 showed that there had been aggressive attempts by the LGBTQ community in the country to push their agenda through Facebook and Instagram. The study further said that Seksualiti Merdeka- an annual sexuality rights festival held in Kuala Lumpur - was organised by organisations deemed illegal in the country. Malaysia opposes LGBTQ advocacy and has criminalised same-sex sexual activity between men and between women. Two years back, campaigners in the UK accused TikTok of helping children to be brainwashed by showing viral social media videos that promoted changing sex as “cool.” A report by the DailyMail said that millions of young people were watching content posted by transgender influencers on the social media app- providing advice on transitioning and accessing hormone therapies. One such video on TikTok said- “Heal with me after top surgery!” – a reference to a reconstructive chest operation. Another video on the platform said- “I used to be a good Christian kid” before showing the person’s transformation as a "trans, gay atheist who loves tattoos and chaos". Speaking to the publication, Kate Harris, of the LGB Alliance, which opposes LGBTQ rights charity Stonewall’s policies on transgender issues, was concerned that millions of children were watching these online transgender influencers. “It’s no coincidence that the growth of TikTok coincides exactly with the exponential growth of children presenting with gender dysphoria,” she said, adding the videos delivered a message that parents should not be involved. “What these videos would lead a generation of children to believe is that it is easy to change sex and that it is the answer to all of your problems.” Now there’s nothing wrong with identifying yourself as different from the gender you were born with or having a different sexual orientation. There is nothing wrong with same-sex marriages. People from the LGBTQ community deserve equal opportunities everywhere be it education, workplace, citizen and human rights, etc. Unfortunately, the community is still fighting for these things, along with the stigma it faces. But does the community have the right to force others to think like them? Should those who oppose and want to stay out of this matter due to personal or religious beliefs be labelled bigot or homophobic? That's some food for thought. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

Rewind 2023: Did the LGBTQ movement cross the line?

The Thai parliament is set to begin deliberating four draft bills on same-sex marriage, moving the country closer towards its legalisation with the first vote on the bills expected later on Thursday.

Thailand edges closer to legalising same-sex marriage

Thailand edges closer to legalising same-sex unions

The third edition of the Rainbow Lit Fest — Queer and Inclusive, owned and sponsored by Dwijen Dinanath Arts Foundation (DDAF), concluded this weekend.

Rainbow Literature Fest 2023: A platform for queer and inclusive expression

Russian security forces raided gay clubs and bars across Moscow on Friday (Dec 1). Citing local media, a report by the news agency Associated Press early Sunday said that police searched venues across Moscow, including a nightclub, a male sauna, and a bar that hosted LGBTQ+ parties, under the pretext of a drug raid.

Russian security forces raided gay clubs and bars across Moscow on Friday (Dec 1). Citing local media, a report by the news agency Associated Press early Sunday said that police searched venues across Moscow, including a nightclub, a male sauna, and a bar that hosted LGBTQ+ parties, under the pretext of a drug raid. According to witnesses, security services checked documents and photographs of the clubgoers. The witnesses said that the managers (of the clubs) were able to warn patrons before police arrived. Photos and videos on social media showed purportedly showing a police van and officers outside one of the clubs. The raid comes less than two days after the Russian Supreme Court banned the global LGBTQ+ movement and called its activists 'extremists'. The Supreme Court's ruling The apex court's ruling is part of a pattern of increasing restrictions in Russia on expressions of sexual orientation and gender identity, including laws outlawing the promotion of "non-traditional" sexual relations and banning legal or medical changes of gender. It is the latest step in a decade-long crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights under Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has emphasised “traditional family values” during his 24 years in power. Also read: Amid economic crisis in Lebanon, politicians unite to go after LGBTQ+ community The Associated Press report said that several LGBTQ+ venues already closed following the ruling, including St. Petersburg’s gay club Central Station which said in a social media post on Friday that the owner would no longer allow the bar to operate with the law in effect. Before the ruling, leading Russian human rights groups filed a document with the court that called the justice ministry lawsuit discriminatory and a violation of the country's constitution. Some LGBTQ+ activists tried to become a party in the case but were rebuffed by the court, the report added. Speaking to the news agency, Max Olenichev, a human rights lawyer who works with the community, LGBTQ+ said, "In practice, it could happen that the Russian authorities, with this court ruling in hand, will enforce (the ruling) against LGBTQ+ initiatives that work in Russia, considering them a part of this civic movement." (With inputs from agencies)

Russia: Security forces raid gay clubs and bars across Moscow

The Supreme Court of Russia decided on Thursday to label LGBT campaigners as extremists, a decision that gay and transgender rights advocates fear may result in arrests and legal action. In court, a Reuters reporter heard it declare that it had granted the justice ministry's plea to label "the international LGBT social movement" as extreme and to outlaw its operations.

Russia's Supreme Court bans LGBTQ movement, asks govt to designate gays as extremists

Russia banned the "international LGBT movement" on Thursday (Nov 30), claiming that it was an extremist group, a step which cements the long crackdown on the LGBTQ community as the country pushes for conservative social values. 
 
In the past decade, President Vladimir Putin has informed Russians to follow the conservative social values which have been promoted by the Orthodox Church. 
 
The ruling was handed down by the Supreme Court in Moscow on Thursday (Nov 30), as reported by AFP. 
 
It did not clarify if certain organisations or individuals will be affected by the ruling. 
 
The judge ruled that "the international LGBT public movement and its subdivisions" were extremist, and issued a "ban on its activities on the territory of Russia”. 
 
He added that the order was placed into effect immediately.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-takes-steps-to-make-foreigners-sign-a-loyalty-agreement-664324">Russia takes steps to make foreigners sign a 'loyalty agreement'</a>

If the law is applied to citizens, the "extremist" label will place gay, lesbian, transgender or queer people who are residents in Russia at risk of facing years of imprisonment. 
 
The court hearing happened behind closed doors and there was no defence present in the case, as reported by Russian media ahead of the verdict. 
 
"One day it will be over but for now we need to try to continue to live and save ourselves," said the Feminist Anti-War Resistance on social media, while responding to the verdict.

<h2>'New low point of insanity'</h2>

Other NGOs, which include transgender rights group "Center T", said that they will publish the safety guidelines for the LGBTQ community's members. 
 
Director of the NGO Yan Dvorkin, who fled from Russia citing security issues, said that the legal proceeding is a "new low point of insanity".

Watch:&nbsp;All eight Finland-Russia border crossing points closed

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/all-eight-finland-russia-border-crossing-points-closed-wion-664692/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Russian administration is said to have taken a steep conservative turn after it deployed troops to Ukraine last year. Dvorkin said that he feels all LGBTQ people are being used by the Russian authorities as scapegoats. 
 
"They're losing the war. This makes people very frustrated and dissatisfied with the government. It's very easy to take that anger out on LGBTQ people,” the director said. 
 
Any kind of administrative procedure and medical intervention which helped in gender reassignment was banned by Russia in July. 
 
At that time, lawmaker Pyotr Tolstoy said that the measure was about “erecting a barrier to the penetration of Western anti-family ideology”.

(With inputs from agencies)

Russia banned the "international LGBT movement" on Thursday (Nov 30), claiming that it was an extremist group, a step which cements the long crackdown on the LGBTQ community as the country pushes for conservative social values.

Russia banned the "international LGBT movement" on Thursday (Nov 30), claiming that it was an extremist group, a step which cements the long crackdown on the LGBTQ community as the country pushes for conservative social values. In the past decade, President Vladimir Putin has informed Russians to follow the conservative social values which have been promoted by the Orthodox Church. The ruling was handed down by the Supreme Court in Moscow on Thursday (Nov 30), as reported by AFP. It did not clarify if certain organisations or individuals will be affected by the ruling. The judge ruled that "the international LGBT public movement and its subdivisions" were extremist, and issued a "ban on its activities on the territory of Russia”. He added that the order was placed into effect immediately. Also read: Russia takes steps to make foreigners sign a 'loyalty agreement' If the law is applied to citizens, the "extremist" label will place gay, lesbian, transgender or queer people who are residents in Russia at risk of facing years of imprisonment. The court hearing happened behind closed doors and there was no defence present in the case, as reported by Russian media ahead of the verdict. "One day it will be over but for now we need to try to continue to live and save ourselves," said the Feminist Anti-War Resistance on social media, while responding to the verdict. 'New low point of insanity' Other NGOs, which include transgender rights group "Center T", said that they will publish the safety guidelines for the LGBTQ community's members. Director of the NGO Yan Dvorkin, who fled from Russia citing security issues, said that the legal proceeding is a "new low point of insanity". Watch: All eight Finland-Russia border crossing points closed Russian administration is said to have taken a steep conservative turn after it deployed troops to Ukraine last year. Dvorkin said that he feels all LGBTQ people are being used by the Russian authorities as scapegoats. "They're losing the war. This makes people very frustrated and dissatisfied with the government. It's very easy to take that anger out on LGBTQ people,” the director said. Any kind of administrative procedure and medical intervention which helped in gender reassignment was banned by Russia in July. At that time, lawmaker Pyotr Tolstoy said that the measure was about “erecting a barrier to the penetration of Western anti-family ideology”. (With inputs from agencies)

Russia imposes ban on 'international LGBT movement', terming it 'extremist group'

Authorities in a village in Nepal registered first same-sex marriage in the Himalayan nation in what is being termed as a 'historic' step in the largely conservative country. The development came after country's Supreme Court passed an interim order that removed obstacles in the path of such marriages.

Thirty-six-year-old Ram Bahadur (Maya) Gurung (36), who was born male but identifies as female got married to Surendra Pandey (26), who was born male and identifies as one. The union was registered formally at Dordi village in Lumjung district which is in the western part of the country.

"We are both very happy. Like us, all others in our community are happy too," said Pandey as quoted by Reuters.

Watch | Nepal government announces election date, polls to fill 19 seats in Upper House

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nepal-government-announces-election-date-polls-to-fill-19-seats-in-upper-house-wion-664334/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Both of them have been in relationship for nine years. They got married in 2016 but did not have marriage registration certificate.

"We have issued the marriage registration certificate to the couple in consideration of the Supreme Court order and instructions from relevant government authorities," said Hem Raj Kafle, chief administrative officer of the Dordi rural municipality.

Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/protests-court-appeals-as-nepals-tiktokers-decry-government-ban-on-app-661937">Protests, court appeals as Nepal's TikTokers decry government ban on app</a>

Nepal's Supreme Court allowed marriage registration of same-sex couples by issuing an interim order pending a final verdict.

<h2>Historic&nbsp;development, says activist</h2>

Sunil Babu Pant, who founded Nepal's prominent gay rights organisation Blue Diamond Society hailed the latest development and said that it was a win for sexual and gender minorities who have been demanding equal right and recognition of their marriages.

"It is historic," said Pant who is a former lawmaker. He said that this was first such marriage registration in South Asia.

"It will open the door for them to jointly open bank accounts, own and transfer property like just any other couples."

Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pro-monarchy-and-anti-govt-supporters-clash-with-each-in-nepal-30-injured-662096">Pro-monarchy and anti-govt demonstrations in Nepal injure 30</a> 
&nbsp; 
In Asia, Taiwan is the only other country that legally recognises same-sex marriages.

Nepal is a Hindu-majority nation. Nepali population has become more progressive since the end of Maoist insurgency in the year 2006.

(With inputs from agencies)

Authorities in a village in Nepal registered first same-sex marriage in the Himalayan nation in what is being termed as a 'historic' step in the largely conservative country.

Authorities in a village in Nepal registered first same-sex marriage in the Himalayan nation in what is being termed as a 'historic' step in the largely conservative country. The development came after country's Supreme Court passed an interim order that removed obstacles in the path of such marriages. Thirty-six-year-old Ram Bahadur (Maya) Gurung (36), who was born male but identifies as female got married to Surendra Pandey (26), who was born male and identifies as one. The union was registered formally at Dordi village in Lumjung district which is in the western part of the country. "We are both very happy. Like us, all others in our community are happy too," said Pandey as quoted by Reuters. Watch | Nepal government announces election date, polls to fill 19 seats in Upper House × Both of them have been in relationship for nine years. They got married in 2016 but did not have marriage registration certificate. "We have issued the marriage registration certificate to the couple in consideration of the Supreme Court order and instructions from relevant government authorities," said Hem Raj Kafle, chief administrative officer of the Dordi rural municipality. Also Read | Protests, court appeals as Nepal's TikTokers decry government ban on app Nepal's Supreme Court allowed marriage registration of same-sex couples by issuing an interim order pending a final verdict. Historic development, says activist Sunil Babu Pant, who founded Nepal's prominent gay rights organisation Blue Diamond Society hailed the latest development and said that it was a win for sexual and gender minorities who have been demanding equal right and recognition of their marriages. "It is historic," said Pant who is a former lawmaker. He said that this was first such marriage registration in South Asia. "It will open the door for them to jointly open bank accounts, own and transfer property like just any other couples." Also Read | Pro-monarchy and anti-govt demonstrations in Nepal injure 30 In Asia, Taiwan is the only other country that legally recognises same-sex marriages. Nepal is a Hindu-majority nation. Nepali population has become more progressive since the end of Maoist insurgency in the year 2006. (With inputs from agencies)

Nepal becomes first South Asian nation to register same-sex marriage

From protest to celebration: 2023 Delhi Queer Pride March spotlights Supreme Court same-sex marriage decision

More than 2,000 people have danced, sang and cheered in a gay pride parade in India's capital, while also raising their concerns over India's restrictive laws. Dancing to drums and music, the participants Sunday carried rainbow flags, multicolored balloons and placards as they walked for more than two hours to the Jantar Mantar area near India's Parliament.

New Delhi: LGBTQIA+ community takes out 14th Delhi Queer Pride parade

Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo, Mexico's first openly non-binary magistrate and prominent LGBTQ+ activist, was discovered dead at home in the central state of Aguascalientes.

Another individual, who was identified as Baena's romantic partner, as per CNN, was also found dead in the residence which was shared by them.

<h2>Cause of death&nbsp;uncertain</h2>

As per Mexico's Security Minister Rosa Icela Rodríguez, the cause of death of the couple remains unknown.&nbsp;

"The investigation is going to be done," said Rodríguez during President Andrés Manuel López Obrador's daily press conference.

Aguascalientes' Attorney General Jesús Figueroa noted that there is no current evidence of foul play.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/one-arrested-on-manslaughter-charges-over-death-of-ice-hockey-player-adam-johnson-658557">One arrested on manslaughter charges over death of ice hockey player Adam Johnson</a>

Preliminary findings, as per the report, indicate no traces of blood outside the crime scene, and no damage to access ways. Authorities have ruled out a third person's involvement. As per the Prosecutor's office, one of the victims was reportedly holding a "cutting instrument".

<h2>Investigation underway</h2>

The prosecutor's office announced that the case would be investigated from a gender perspective due to Baena identifying as a non-binary person.&nbsp;

However, there is no immediate mention of the deaths potentially being linked to a hate crime.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/revolutionary-scientists-have-developed-two-promising-medications-for-bad-cholesterol-658497">'Revolutionary': Scientists have developed two promising medications for 'bad' cholesterol</a>

As per the report, even though Latin America has witnessed progress in marriage equality, LGBTQ+ activists and gender minorities continue to face high levels of violence and discrimination from social and religious conservatives.&nbsp;

CNDH (Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos), or the National Human Rights Commission of Mexico has called for an investigation of the case from the perspective of "Derechos Humanos" or Human Rights.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Lamentamos los fallecimientos no esclarecidos de le magistrade Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo y de Dorian Daniel Nieves Herrera, ocurridos en el estado de <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Aguascalientes?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Aguascalientes</a>, y reclamamos asumir la investigación del caso con perspectiva de <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DerechosHumanos?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DerechosHumanos</a>.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DefendemosAlPueblo?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DefendemosAlPueblo</a> <a href="https://t.co/5OBIA72EnF">pic.twitter.com/5OBIA72EnF</a>
— CNDH en México (@CNDH) <a href="https://twitter.com/CNDH/status/1724462428292055496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 14, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

As the news of Baena&nbsp;broke, thousands of Mexicans took to the streets of Mexico City to demand justice for the Magistrate.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Ésta noche la comunidad LGBT se unió para exigir justicia para el Magistrade Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo. 
 
Aquí imágenes de la Estela de Luz en la CDMX 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ 
 
Uno de los reclamos fue hacia los medios de comunicación tradicional, instrumento de la derecha conservadora. <a href="https://t.co/ZJtALRr13w">pic.twitter.com/ZJtALRr13w</a>
— Gaylor Moon 🏳️‍🌈🌙🎖️💗 (@SoyCriSzis) <a href="https://twitter.com/SoyCriSzis/status/1724257201974321313?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 14, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>Who was Baena?</h2>

Baena served as a member of the Electoral Tribunal in the central Mexican state of Aguascalientes for just over a year.&nbsp;

In October last year, talking to CNN, Baena highlighted that he was the first non-binary magistrate in Latin America.&nbsp;

Emphasising the importance of LGBTQ+ individuals accessing such spaces, he said: "I want to send the message that the LGBTQ population can access these spaces, that there is a possibility, that we have people with enough of a profile that with their own merits can access these spaces where decisions are made".

(With inputs from agencies)

Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo, Mexico's first openly non-binary magistrate and prominent LGBTQ+ activist, was discovered dead at home in the central state of Aguascalientes.

Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo, Mexico's first openly non-binary magistrate and prominent LGBTQ+ activist, was discovered dead at home in the central state of Aguascalientes. Another individual, who was identified as Baena's romantic partner, as per CNN, was also found dead in the residence which was shared by them. Cause of death uncertain As per Mexico's Security Minister Rosa Icela Rodríguez, the cause of death of the couple remains unknown. "The investigation is going to be done," said Rodríguez during President Andrés Manuel López Obrador's daily press conference. Aguascalientes' Attorney General Jesús Figueroa noted that there is no current evidence of foul play. Also read | One arrested on manslaughter charges over death of ice hockey player Adam Johnson Preliminary findings, as per the report, indicate no traces of blood outside the crime scene, and no damage to access ways. Authorities have ruled out a third person's involvement. As per the Prosecutor's office, one of the victims was reportedly holding a "cutting instrument". Investigation underway The prosecutor's office announced that the case would be investigated from a gender perspective due to Baena identifying as a non-binary person. However, there is no immediate mention of the deaths potentially being linked to a hate crime. Also read | 'Revolutionary': Scientists have developed two promising medications for 'bad' cholesterol As per the report, even though Latin America has witnessed progress in marriage equality, LGBTQ+ activists and gender minorities continue to face high levels of violence and discrimination from social and religious conservatives. CNDH (Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos), or the National Human Rights Commission of Mexico has called for an investigation of the case from the perspective of "Derechos Humanos" or Human Rights. Lamentamos los fallecimientos no esclarecidos de le magistrade Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo y de Dorian Daniel Nieves Herrera, ocurridos en el estado de #Aguascalientes, y reclamamos asumir la investigación del caso con perspectiva de #DerechosHumanos.#DefendemosAlPueblo pic.twitter.com/5OBIA72EnF — CNDH en México (@CNDH) November 14, 2023 × As the news of Baena broke, thousands of Mexicans took to the streets of Mexico City to demand justice for the Magistrate. Ésta noche la comunidad LGBT se unió para exigir justicia para el Magistrade Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo. Aquí imágenes de la Estela de Luz en la CDMX 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ Uno de los reclamos fue hacia los medios de comunicación tradicional, instrumento de la derecha conservadora. pic.twitter.com/ZJtALRr13w — Gaylor Moon 🏳️‍🌈🌙🎖️💗 (@SoyCriSzis) November 14, 2023 × Who was Baena? Baena served as a member of the Electoral Tribunal in the central Mexican state of Aguascalientes for just over a year. In October last year, talking to CNN, Baena highlighted that he was the first non-binary magistrate in Latin America. Emphasising the importance of LGBTQ+ individuals accessing such spaces, he said: "I want to send the message that the LGBTQ population can access these spaces, that there is a possibility, that we have people with enough of a profile that with their own merits can access these spaces where decisions are made". (With inputs from agencies)

Mystery surrounds death of Mexico's first non-binary magistrate Jesús Ociel Baena Saucedo

A Florida teacher has lodged a complaint against their former employer, Florida Virtual School, after having shown the door for the use of the gender-neutral honorific "Mx." instead of conventional titles like "Ms." or "Mr." in school communications.&nbsp;

The teacher identifies themselves as AV Vary instead of their legal name.

They also clarified that their selected pronouns and the sex assigned at birth are unrelated but their approach to teaching physics is entirely independent of these personal aspects. "They are so far from related. Getting fired for this, it’s absolute garbage," Vary reportedly said.&nbsp;

They used to teach&nbsp;science virtually at the school until October 24. After being fired from their job, Vary filed a complaint with both the Florida Commission on Human Relations and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israeli-army-says-it-killed-hamas-commander-who-held-1000-gazan-residents-hostage-657628">Israeli army says it killed Hamas commander who held 1,000 Gazan residents hostage</a>

As per reports, they alleged that it was a case of discrimination based on gender identity and a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

However, the school, in a statement to USA Today, mentioned its obligation to adhere to Florida laws and regulations regarding personal titles and pronouns within the public school system.

<h2>Vary's reasoning for using the title&nbsp;</h2>

Giving their reason to use the&nbsp;gender-neutral title "Mx.", Vary said it was done with an intention to convey a welcoming message to students amid a backdrop of legislative actions targeting LGBTQ individuals and topics in schools.&nbsp;

Reportedly, Vary began using the title, which costed them their job, at the beginning of the school year.

It is worth noting that the controversial "Don't Say Gay" law signed by Governor Ron DeSantis in March 2022 prohibited classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in certain grade levels.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-hamas-war-palestinian-health-minister-says-39-babies-at-risk-of-death-in-gazas-al-shifa-hospital-657608">Israel-Hamas war: Palestinian health minister says 39 babies at risk of death in Gaza's Al-Shifa hospital</a>

"When this legislation came out, it was important to me to signal to my marginalised students that I was still a safe place, I was still a safe adult to talk to," Vary reportedly stated.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-says-israel-does-not-want-to-occupy-gaza-657631">Netanyahu says 'Israel does not want to occupy Gaza'</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/netanyahu-says-israel-does-not-want-to-occupy-gaza-657631/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Despite anticipating potential legal issues due to the new law, Vary chose to use "Mx." to affirm their identity as a nonbinary individual and to show solidarity with their students.

The school initially accepted Vary's use of "Mx.," but communication from Principal KJ Anderson in August outlined an expectation for teachers to use traditional courtesy titles like "Mrs.," "Ms.," or "Mr." in communications.&nbsp;Vary was also given the option to not use any title on their announcement page, only their name.

(With inputs from agencies)

&nbsp;

A Florida teacher has lodged a complaint against their former employer, Florida Virtual School, after having shown the door for the use of the gender-neutral honorific "Mx.

A Florida teacher has lodged a complaint against their former employer, Florida Virtual School, after having shown the door for the use of the gender-neutral honorific "Mx." instead of conventional titles like "Ms." or "Mr." in school communications. The teacher identifies themselves as AV Vary instead of their legal name. They also clarified that their selected pronouns and the sex assigned at birth are unrelated but their approach to teaching physics is entirely independent of these personal aspects. "They are so far from related. Getting fired for this, it’s absolute garbage," Vary reportedly said. They used to teach science virtually at the school until October 24. After being fired from their job, Vary filed a complaint with both the Florida Commission on Human Relations and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Also Read | Israeli army says it killed Hamas commander who held 1,000 Gazan residents hostage As per reports, they alleged that it was a case of discrimination based on gender identity and a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, the school, in a statement to USA Today, mentioned its obligation to adhere to Florida laws and regulations regarding personal titles and pronouns within the public school system. Vary's reasoning for using the title Giving their reason to use the gender-neutral title "Mx.", Vary said it was done with an intention to convey a welcoming message to students amid a backdrop of legislative actions targeting LGBTQ individuals and topics in schools. Reportedly, Vary began using the title, which costed them their job, at the beginning of the school year. It is worth noting that the controversial "Don't Say Gay" law signed by Governor Ron DeSantis in March 2022 prohibited classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in certain grade levels. Also Read | Israel-Hamas war: Palestinian health minister says 39 babies at risk of death in Gaza's Al-Shifa hospital "When this legislation came out, it was important to me to signal to my marginalised students that I was still a safe place, I was still a safe adult to talk to," Vary reportedly stated. Watch | Netanyahu says 'Israel does not want to occupy Gaza' × Despite anticipating potential legal issues due to the new law, Vary chose to use "Mx." to affirm their identity as a nonbinary individual and to show solidarity with their students. The school initially accepted Vary's use of "Mx.," but communication from Principal KJ Anderson in August outlined an expectation for teachers to use traditional courtesy titles like "Mrs.," "Ms.," or "Mr." in communications. Vary was also given the option to not use any title on their announcement page, only their name. (With inputs from agencies)

Florida teacher shown the door by school for using gender-neutral honorific 'Mx.'

Ayushmaan, a Delhi-based housing rights lawyer well-known by his drag avatar Lush Monsoon, is advocating for an authentic representation of the LGBTQIA+ community in the Indian entertainment industry.

After the release of the docu-series Rainbow Rishta, which captures&nbsp;the challenges and vibrancy of the LGBTQIA+ community in India, WION caught up with Ayushmaan for a quick chat over a variety of topics.&nbsp;

Rainbow Rishta is a compilation of six stories that show the rawness behind queer love and what it is like to be a part of the LGBTQIA+ community in India. One of these stories is of Ayushmaan's.

Speaking to WION in an exclusive conversation after the release of the series, Ayushmaan said that the queer community "has mostly been portrayed as either caricatures or victims in entertainment in India."&nbsp;

Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/rainbow-rishta-review-tinged-with-gloom-this-docu-series-is-a-candid-exploration-of-queer-emotions-656562">Rainbow Rishta review: Tinged with gloom, this docu-series is a candid exploration of queer emotions</a>

"Growing up, I did not have any queer role models to look up to. All the queer characters were shown as either sad or suffering. I hope that through this series people get to experience our joy, love, and laughter," he added.&nbsp;

He said that even though even queer people "face multiple struggles and challenges due to society’s heteronormative setup" but at the same time they also "manage to find our happiness, allies, and chosen families."&nbsp;

"All the stories on Rainbow Rishta depict that it is possible to find love, and to be queer and thriving. I also hope that the viewers can see that LGBTQI+ people feel the same need for love and companionship as everyone else, and behind all our glamorous façade and stereotypes is the human desire to feel seen and visible," he told WION.&nbsp;

Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/i-dont-expect-court-activist-says-review-petition-over-same-sex-marriage-verdict-to-fail-654356">'I don't expect court...': Activist says review petition on India SC's same-sex marriage verdict will fail</a>

Ayushmaan pointed out that one significant challenge faced by the LGBTQ+ community in the Indian entertainment industry was the lack of opportunities to tell their own stories authentically.&nbsp;

"With queer people behind and in front of the camera, we will be able to bring out the nuances in our life, beyond just the usual tropes."&nbsp;

"Queerness isn’t just one thing and it has several different aspects. I wish people could see the experiences of people across the spectrum. And Rainbow Rishta tries to do that. Moreover, queer people aren’t always accorded the privilege of leading normal lives, so in our urge of assimilating we shouldn’t lose the richness of our lives."

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-approves-worlds-1st-chikungunya-vaccine-657532">US approves world's 1st chikungunya vaccine</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-approves-worlds-1st-chikungunya-vaccine-657532/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Ayushmaan revealed that initially while filming for the drag avatar for Rainbow Rishta docu-series, he faced initial hesitancy in front of the crew, but their genuine curiosity and appreciation for the art form overwhelmed any reservations.&nbsp;

He said the directors and camera crew were familiar with his drag avatar but it was a surprise for the rest of the crew members.

"I felt a slight hesitancy in the beginning getting into makeup in front of everyone, but once they saw me in drag they were completely mesmerised. Some of the crew were from my home state of Jharkhand, and they came to me after the shoot was done to tell me that they appreciated the art form and wanted to know more about it. It was really heartening to see people from different backgrounds be appreciative. I hope that the show will have the same effect&nbsp;on&nbsp;the&nbsp;viewers."&nbsp; 
 
&nbsp;

Ayushmaan, a Delhi-based housing rights lawyer well-known by his drag avatar Lush Monsoon, is advocating for an authentic representation of the LGBTQIA+ community in the Indian entertainment industry.

Ayushmaan, a Delhi-based housing rights lawyer well-known by his drag avatar Lush Monsoon, is advocating for an authentic representation of the LGBTQIA+ community in the Indian entertainment industry. After the release of the docu-series Rainbow Rishta, which captures the challenges and vibrancy of the LGBTQIA+ community in India, WION caught up with Ayushmaan for a quick chat over a variety of topics. Rainbow Rishta is a compilation of six stories that show the rawness behind queer love and what it is like to be a part of the LGBTQIA+ community in India. One of these stories is of Ayushmaan's. Speaking to WION in an exclusive conversation after the release of the series, Ayushmaan said that the queer community "has mostly been portrayed as either caricatures or victims in entertainment in India." Also Read | Rainbow Rishta review: Tinged with gloom, this docu-series is a candid exploration of queer emotions "Growing up, I did not have any queer role models to look up to. All the queer characters were shown as either sad or suffering. I hope that through this series people get to experience our joy, love, and laughter," he added. He said that even though even queer people "face multiple struggles and challenges due to society’s heteronormative setup" but at the same time they also "manage to find our happiness, allies, and chosen families." "All the stories on Rainbow Rishta depict that it is possible to find love, and to be queer and thriving. I also hope that the viewers can see that LGBTQI+ people feel the same need for love and companionship as everyone else, and behind all our glamorous façade and stereotypes is the human desire to feel seen and visible," he told WION. Also Read | 'I don't expect court...': Activist says review petition on India SC's same-sex marriage verdict will fail Ayushmaan pointed out that one significant challenge faced by the LGBTQ+ community in the Indian entertainment industry was the lack of opportunities to tell their own stories authentically. "With queer people behind and in front of the camera, we will be able to bring out the nuances in our life, beyond just the usual tropes." "Queerness isn’t just one thing and it has several different aspects. I wish people could see the experiences of people across the spectrum. And Rainbow Rishta tries to do that. Moreover, queer people aren’t always accorded the privilege of leading normal lives, so in our urge of assimilating we shouldn’t lose the richness of our lives." Watch | US approves world's 1st chikungunya vaccine × Ayushmaan revealed that initially while filming for the drag avatar for Rainbow Rishta docu-series, he faced initial hesitancy in front of the crew, but their genuine curiosity and appreciation for the art form overwhelmed any reservations. He said the directors and camera crew were familiar with his drag avatar but it was a surprise for the rest of the crew members. "I felt a slight hesitancy in the beginning getting into makeup in front of everyone, but once they saw me in drag they were completely mesmerised. Some of the crew were from my home state of Jharkhand, and they came to me after the shoot was done to tell me that they appreciated the art form and wanted to know more about it. It was really heartening to see people from different backgrounds be appreciative. I hope that the show will have the same effect on the viewers."

Lush Monsoon: We need authentic LGBTQIA+ representation in ent industry, ‘nuances beyond usual tropes’

In Hungary, where laws ban the "promotion of homosexuality" to children, the director of the National Museum was dismissed on Monday after he allowed children to visit an image exhibition featuring LGBT people.

The event in question was a World Press Photo exhibition titled 'Home for the Golden Gays' by Hannah Reyes Morales. It featured the inhabitants of a community-run care home for LGBT people in the Philippines capital, Manila.

<h2>How an exhibition became the cause of dismissal</h2>

Laszlo Simon, the now-former director of the National Museum, was dismissed after the nation's far-right Mi Hazank (Our Homeland) party&nbsp;launched a government inquiry.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/health-and-wellness/british-startup-launches-tampon-that-offers-stis-screening-655876">British startup launches tampon that offers STI screening</a>

The party, as per The Guardian, cited a 2021 law which bans the "display and promotion of homosexuality" to under-18s.

On Monday, the nation's Minister for Culture and Innovation Janos Csak announced Simon's dismissal for failing to comply "with the legal obligations of the institution".

<h2>What the museum and its former director said</h2>

Following the government inquiry, the museum stated that it had included a message on its website asking those deemed too young to see the exhibition to skip it. It also said it had no right to ask visitors for ID proof to determine their age.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-ex-prez-donald-trump-fights-with-judge-during-testimony-in-civil-fraud-trial-655906">Ex-US prez Donald Trump fights with judge during testimony in civil fraud trial</a>

Acknowledging his sacking on Facebook, Simon denied that he had deliberately violated any laws and said that the museum had flagged the age restriction on its website "without delay".

<h2>The Hungarian law banning homosexual content</h2>

In 2021, Hungary's parliament passed a law that bans gay people from featuring in school educational material or TV shows that those under 18 years of age could access.

At the time, a spokesperson for Viktor Orbán’s ruling party said: "There are contents which children under a certain age can misunderstand and which may have a detrimental effect on their development at the given age, or which children simply cannot process, and which could therefore confuse their developing moral values or their image of themselves or the world."

(With inputs from agencies)

In Hungary, where laws ban the "promotion of homosexuality" to children, the director of the National Museum was dismissed on Monday after he allowed children to visit an image exhibition featuring LGBT people.

In Hungary, where laws ban the "promotion of homosexuality" to children, the director of the National Museum was dismissed on Monday after he allowed children to visit an image exhibition featuring LGBT people. The event in question was a World Press Photo exhibition titled 'Home for the Golden Gays' by Hannah Reyes Morales. It featured the inhabitants of a community-run care home for LGBT people in the Philippines capital, Manila. How an exhibition became the cause of dismissal Laszlo Simon, the now-former director of the National Museum, was dismissed after the nation's far-right Mi Hazank (Our Homeland) party launched a government inquiry. Also read | British startup launches tampon that offers STI screening The party, as per The Guardian, cited a 2021 law which bans the "display and promotion of homosexuality" to under-18s. On Monday, the nation's Minister for Culture and Innovation Janos Csak announced Simon's dismissal for failing to comply "with the legal obligations of the institution". What the museum and its former director said Following the government inquiry, the museum stated that it had included a message on its website asking those deemed too young to see the exhibition to skip it. It also said it had no right to ask visitors for ID proof to determine their age. Also read | Ex-US prez Donald Trump fights with judge during testimony in civil fraud trial Acknowledging his sacking on Facebook, Simon denied that he had deliberately violated any laws and said that the museum had flagged the age restriction on its website "without delay". The Hungarian law banning homosexual content In 2021, Hungary's parliament passed a law that bans gay people from featuring in school educational material or TV shows that those under 18 years of age could access. At the time, a spokesperson for Viktor Orbán’s ruling party said: "There are contents which children under a certain age can misunderstand and which may have a detrimental effect on their development at the given age, or which children simply cannot process, and which could therefore confuse their developing moral values or their image of themselves or the world." (With inputs from agencies)

Hungary dismisses museum director for exposing children to LGBT content

In Pics | Crowds throng Taipei as Taiwan celebrates east Asia's largest Pride march

On Wednesday, the Lithuanian government decided to repeal a contentious bill that some had nicknamed the "gay propaganda" law. The infamous laws, which were implemented in 2009, prevent youngsters from learning about same-sex marriage and LGBTQI concerns.

Lithuania to ditch controversial Russian-style anti-queer law

The Lithuanian government moved on Wednesday to discard a controversial law dubbed by critics as the "gay propaganda" law.

Lithuania mulls to reform controversial 'anti-gay' law

India's Supreme Court has turned down a plea to legalise same-sex marriage, saying that is the prerogative of the legislature. The apex court has however acknowledged that marriages cannot depend on sexual orientation. It asked the government to form a committee to address the concerns of queer couples.

India's apex court refuses to legalise same-sex marriage

India is considered one of the most culturally diverse nations globally. A big part of this culture since ancient times is its queer community.&nbsp;

From the sculptures of Khajuraho to characters like Shikhandi in Indian mythology, the LGBTQIA+ community has played a huge role in Indian culture. In spite of that, the community has long been constitutionally deprived of basic rights like marriage.&nbsp;

On Tuesday, 17th October 2023, the Indian Supreme court announced a verdict on&nbsp;LGBT rights like marriage and adoption. The top court failed to recognise gay marriage and said that the decision lies with India's legislative.&nbsp;

<h2>Supreme Court verdict and the queer community in India</h2>

The verdict has "quashed the hopes of millions," said Queering in Chandigarh (QiC), an LGBT collective based in Indian Union Territory Chandigarh.

A five-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha, had divided views on the various civil petitions before it.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/same-sex-marriage-verdict-live-india-awaits-historical-judgement-647796">Same-sex marriage verdict | India fails to recognise gay marriage</a>

While the bench concurred that queerness as a concept is a natural phenomenon known for ages and is neither urban nor elite, it said the court can't make law, but only interpret it.&nbsp;

The justices also said that it is for Parliament to change the Special Marriage Act.&nbsp;

Talking to WION, QiC questioned the bench's insistence over separation of power, and said: "It is said that separation of powers is the best safeguard for human liberty in a liberal democracy, but what happens when that separation of powers argument comes to hinder the growth and development of a section of the populace of the democracy?"

As per the queer collective, "CJI D Y Chandrachud, while having positivity in his views on the matter, shielded himself and his bench’s decision of not recognising same-sex marriage in India, behind separation of power principle."

They said that "despite the various arguments that the CJI came up with to show support and solidarity with the community, he failed to bring about a change in the laws of the land."

<h2>'Hope is not lost'</h2>

"In some form or the other (the judgement), quashed the hopes of millions," said Pranav Puri, a core member of QiC. However, he added that "while today is not the day we get our rights, all hope is not lost."

"By recognising that homosexuality is not an urban and elite concept, the five judge bench went in direct contradiction to the stand of the union government, who have been in stern opposition of the case," he added.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/he-said-she-said-outlandish-arguments-groundbreaking-statements-from-indias-same-sex-marriage-hearing-586946">'He said, she said': Outlandish arguments, groundbreaking statements from India's same-sex marriage trial</a>

Simran Chawla, founder of QiC noted that "while everybody in the community hoped that the decision would be positive, there was a hint of negativity that was harboured seeing the environment of our social-polity."

However, Chawla acknowledged the merit of CJI Chandrachud's judgement regarding section 4 of the Special Marriage Act - which deals with polygamy, minimum age of marriage, soundness of mind of the two parties, etc.

"On the aspect of annulment of section 4 of the SMA, I have to stand with the learned CJI, where he said that if we strike down that section, it would send India back to the pre-independence age."

She said, "while we want our rights to be added to the pre-existing jurisprudence of the country, any action that gives me my right, but infringes upon the right of the other (which is already in place) should not be done so."

Hemakshi (he/him), who is part of India's queer community and an active&nbsp;member&nbsp;of QiC emphasised that the journey ahead would be challenging but affirmed the ongoing commitment to the "fight."

"We appreciate the efforts of the queer activists, lawyers and visionaries who have paved the way for us to reach here. We're grateful for them, and we'll continue to join them&nbsp;in&nbsp;this&nbsp;fight," he said.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

India is considered one of the most culturally diverse nations globally. A big part of this culture since ancient times is its queer community. From the sculptures of Khajuraho to characters like Shikhandi in Indian mythology, the LGBTQIA+ community has played a huge role in Indian culture.

India is considered one of the most culturally diverse nations globally. A big part of this culture since ancient times is its queer community. From the sculptures of Khajuraho to characters like Shikhandi in Indian mythology, the LGBTQIA+ community has played a huge role in Indian culture. In spite of that, the community has long been constitutionally deprived of basic rights like marriage. On Tuesday, 17th October 2023, the Indian Supreme court announced a verdict on LGBT rights like marriage and adoption. The top court failed to recognise gay marriage and said that the decision lies with India's legislative. Supreme Court verdict and the queer community in India The verdict has "quashed the hopes of millions," said Queering in Chandigarh (QiC), an LGBT collective based in Indian Union Territory Chandigarh. A five-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha, had divided views on the various civil petitions before it. Also read | Same-sex marriage verdict | India fails to recognise gay marriage While the bench concurred that queerness as a concept is a natural phenomenon known for ages and is neither urban nor elite, it said the court can't make law, but only interpret it. The justices also said that it is for Parliament to change the Special Marriage Act. Talking to WION, QiC questioned the bench's insistence over separation of power, and said: "It is said that separation of powers is the best safeguard for human liberty in a liberal democracy, but what happens when that separation of powers argument comes to hinder the growth and development of a section of the populace of the democracy?" As per the queer collective, "CJI D Y Chandrachud, while having positivity in his views on the matter, shielded himself and his bench’s decision of not recognising same-sex marriage in India, behind separation of power principle." They said that "despite the various arguments that the CJI came up with to show support and solidarity with the community, he failed to bring about a change in the laws of the land." 'Hope is not lost' "In some form or the other (the judgement), quashed the hopes of millions," said Pranav Puri, a core member of QiC. However, he added that "while today is not the day we get our rights, all hope is not lost." "By recognising that homosexuality is not an urban and elite concept, the five judge bench went in direct contradiction to the stand of the union government, who have been in stern opposition of the case," he added. Also read | 'He said, she said': Outlandish arguments, groundbreaking statements from India's same-sex marriage trial Simran Chawla, founder of QiC noted that "while everybody in the community hoped that the decision would be positive, there was a hint of negativity that was harboured seeing the environment of our social-polity." However, Chawla acknowledged the merit of CJI Chandrachud's judgement regarding section 4 of the Special Marriage Act - which deals with polygamy, minimum age of marriage, soundness of mind of the two parties, etc. "On the aspect of annulment of section 4 of the SMA, I have to stand with the learned CJI, where he said that if we strike down that section, it would send India back to the pre-independence age." She said, "while we want our rights to be added to the pre-existing jurisprudence of the country, any action that gives me my right, but infringes upon the right of the other (which is already in place) should not be done so." Hemakshi (he/him), who is part of India's queer community and an active member of QiC emphasised that the journey ahead would be challenging but affirmed the ongoing commitment to the "fight." "We appreciate the efforts of the queer activists, lawyers and visionaries who have paved the way for us to reach here. We're grateful for them, and we'll continue to join them in this fight," he said. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Exclusive | Supreme Court's verdict 'quashed the hopes of millions', say LGBT rights activists

The Supreme Court is likely to pronounce its verdict on the legal recognition of same-sex marriage today ie. on 17 October. The apex court had reserved its judgment on 11 May on a batch of pleas seeking legal validation for same-sex marriage.

India’s supreme court to hand down verdict on same-sex marriage

India’s Supreme Court finished&nbsp;hearing a clutch of petitions urging the court to validate same-sex marriage in the country, back in May 2023.&nbsp;A five-judge constitutional bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha heard the arguments, and will soon pass their judgement on&nbsp;pleas seeking recognition of same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act, Foreign Marriage Act and the Hindu Marriage Act.&nbsp;

Though the apex court decriminalised homosexuality in 2018, same-sex marriages remain illegal and unrecognised by Indian laws. &nbsp;

The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has repeatedly opposed any recognition of same-sex marriages, even though Indian society,&nbsp;has begun to gradually accept&nbsp;the LGBTQ+ community. &nbsp;

When did the case reach the apex court?&nbsp;

On November 25 last year, two gay couples approached the top court seeking recognition of same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act, following which the court issued notices on the plea.&nbsp;

They wanted the court to make provisions so that the Special Marriage Act be made gender-neutral by striking out gender-or sexuality-based discrimination.&nbsp;

The apex court had noted that a similar case was taken by the Kerala High Court, in which the Union Government made a statement through the Deputy Solicitor General that the ministry was taking steps to get all the writ petitions, including the writ petition before the High Court of Delhi, transferred to the SC.&nbsp;

Then, a two-judge bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud issued a notice and sought a response from the central government, and the Attorney General for India.&nbsp;

Later on January 6, 2023, the apex court ordered the transfer of all petitions seeking legal recognition for same-sex marriages pending before different high courts.&nbsp;

What is the government's opinion?&nbsp;

The Narendra Modi-led Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government has opposed in the Supreme Court a batch of pleas seeking legal validation of same-sex marriage, saying it would cause complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws and accepted societal values.&nbsp;

In an affidavit filed before the apex court, the government submitted that despite the decriminalisation of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners cannot claim a fundamental right for same-sex marriage to be recognised under the laws of the country.&nbsp;

Calling the petitions seeking the right to same-sex marriage an “urban elitist concept far removed from social ethos of the country”, the submission filed by the government stated that recognition of marriage is essentially a legislative function and that the courts should refrain from deciding.

“A decision by the court in recognising the right of same-sex marriage would mean a virtual judicial rewriting of an entire branch of law. The court must refrain from passing such omnibus orders. Proper authority for the same is appropriate legislature...Given the fundamental social origin of these laws, any change in order to be legitimate would have to come from the bottom up and through legislation...a change cannot be compelled by judicial fiat and the best judge of the pace of change is the legislature itself,” stated the application.

Which way are the courts leaning?

According to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, "no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” This fundamental right is available to every person, citizens and foreigners alike.

The courts have time and again cited this article while ruling in favour of contentious issues like inter-faith and inter-caste marriages, and ordered the police and other rights organisations to give them protection whenever they feel or are threatened by parents or society, noting that “all adults have the right to marry a person of their choice.”

In 2018, when the court decriminalised homosexuality, it noted, “Members of the LGBTQ+ community are entitled to the benefit of an equal citizenship, without discrimination, and to the equal protection of the law."

“The choice of whom to partner, the ability to find fulfilment in sexual intimacies and the right not to be subjected to discriminatory behaviour are intrinsic to the constitutional protection of sexual orientation.”

Why do the petitioners want legal validation?

Even though India has accepted people of the LGBTQ+ community, and they have been allowed to live together, they still cannot marry each other, as there is no legal provision that gives them the right to do so.

The problem for LGBTQ+ couples arises when they want to adopt a child or have a kid through surrogacy.

As per the Indian surrogacy laws, which was amended in 2016, single parents, homosexuals, live-in couples, and foreign single individuals are prohibited from having children through surrogate mothers.

The same rule kicks in when trying to adopt children in India.

Apart from that, same-sex couples are not entitled to rights to inheritance, maintenance and tax benefits. After a partner passes away, they cannot avail benefits like pension or compensation.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

India’s Supreme Court finished hearing a clutch of petitions urging the court to validate same-sex marriage in the country, back in May 2023. A five-judge constitutional bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha heard the arguments, and will soon pass their judgement on pleas seeking recognition of same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act, Foreign Marriage Act and the Hindu Marriage Act.

India’s Supreme Court finished hearing a clutch of petitions urging the court to validate same-sex marriage in the country, back in May 2023. A five-judge constitutional bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha heard the arguments, and will soon pass their judgement on pleas seeking recognition of same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act, Foreign Marriage Act and the Hindu Marriage Act. Though the apex court decriminalised homosexuality in 2018, same-sex marriages remain illegal and unrecognised by Indian laws. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has repeatedly opposed any recognition of same-sex marriages, even though Indian society, has begun to gradually accept the LGBTQ+ community. When did the case reach the apex court? On November 25 last year, two gay couples approached the top court seeking recognition of same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act, following which the court issued notices on the plea. They wanted the court to make provisions so that the Special Marriage Act be made gender-neutral by striking out gender-or sexuality-based discrimination. The apex court had noted that a similar case was taken by the Kerala High Court, in which the Union Government made a statement through the Deputy Solicitor General that the ministry was taking steps to get all the writ petitions, including the writ petition before the High Court of Delhi, transferred to the SC. Then, a two-judge bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud issued a notice and sought a response from the central government, and the Attorney General for India. Later on January 6, 2023, the apex court ordered the transfer of all petitions seeking legal recognition for same-sex marriages pending before different high courts. What is the government's opinion? The Narendra Modi-led Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government has opposed in the Supreme Court a batch of pleas seeking legal validation of same-sex marriage, saying it would cause complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws and accepted societal values. In an affidavit filed before the apex court, the government submitted that despite the decriminalisation of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners cannot claim a fundamental right for same-sex marriage to be recognised under the laws of the country. Calling the petitions seeking the right to same-sex marriage an “urban elitist concept far removed from social ethos of the country”, the submission filed by the government stated that recognition of marriage is essentially a legislative function and that the courts should refrain from deciding. “A decision by the court in recognising the right of same-sex marriage would mean a virtual judicial rewriting of an entire branch of law. The court must refrain from passing such omnibus orders. Proper authority for the same is appropriate legislature...Given the fundamental social origin of these laws, any change in order to be legitimate would have to come from the bottom up and through legislation...a change cannot be compelled by judicial fiat and the best judge of the pace of change is the legislature itself,” stated the application. Which way are the courts leaning? According to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, "no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” This fundamental right is available to every person, citizens and foreigners alike. The courts have time and again cited this article while ruling in favour of contentious issues like inter-faith and inter-caste marriages, and ordered the police and other rights organisations to give them protection whenever they feel or are threatened by parents or society, noting that “all adults have the right to marry a person of their choice.” In 2018, when the court decriminalised homosexuality, it noted, “Members of the LGBTQ+ community are entitled to the benefit of an equal citizenship, without discrimination, and to the equal protection of the law." “The choice of whom to partner, the ability to find fulfilment in sexual intimacies and the right not to be subjected to discriminatory behaviour are intrinsic to the constitutional protection of sexual orientation.” Why do the petitioners want legal validation? Even though India has accepted people of the LGBTQ+ community, and they have been allowed to live together, they still cannot marry each other, as there is no legal provision that gives them the right to do so. The problem for LGBTQ+ couples arises when they want to adopt a child or have a kid through surrogacy. As per the Indian surrogacy laws, which was amended in 2016, single parents, homosexuals, live-in couples, and foreign single individuals are prohibited from having children through surrogate mothers. The same rule kicks in when trying to adopt children in India. Apart from that, same-sex couples are not entitled to rights to inheritance, maintenance and tax benefits. After a partner passes away, they cannot avail benefits like pension or compensation. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Explained: Why same-sex couples in India are seeking conjugal rights when homosexuality is decriminalised

The Supreme Court pronounced its verdict on the legal recognition of same-sex marriage. Though the court refused to legalise same-sex marriage but granted equal rights to LGBTQ Community.

Same-Sex Marriage Verdict: India's Supreme Court issues historic verdict

Pope Francis has signaled the winds to change up, until now the Catholic Church had managed to keep its conservative values on the LGBTQ plus community intact but now it can change. Watch the video to know more.

Future of catholic church: LGBTQ couples could be blessed in Vatican

Hundreds came out on the streets in Asuncion, Paraguay to demand equal rights for the LGBTQ-plus Community people of all ages.

On Agenda: Equal rights for the LGBTQ Community, STD awareness

The Texas Supreme Court has greenlit a new law banning gender-affirming care for minors. The law will take effect on Friday (September 1st) and will make Texas the most populous US state to impose such restrictions on transgender children.

Activists and legal advocates have labelled the new law and the court's decision 'cruel',&nbsp;however, conservative groups have welcomed it and say 'kids are safer today'.

<h2>What the law bans</h2>

As per a report by news agency AP, the Texas law would prevent transgender minors from accessing treatments such as hormone therapies, puberty blockers, and transition surgeries.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/canada-issues-travel-advisory-to-lgbtqi-citizens-visiting-us-630619">Canada issues travel advisory to LGBTQI+ citizens visiting US, cites new laws, policies</a>

The report states that medical experts have long said that such surgical procedures are rarely performed on children.&nbsp;

It also stipulates that children who were already undergoing the prohibited medications and treatments are required to be weaned off "the prescription drug over a period of time and in a manner that is safe and medically appropriate."

<h2>'Cruel' decision or not</h2>

Advocacy groups fighting for gender-affirming care in the state on Thursday called the court's decision and the law "cruel" and said that "the fight is far from over."

"Transgender youth and their families are forced to confront the start of the school year, fearful of what awaits them. But let us be clear: The fight is far from over," they said in a joint statement.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/progressive-or-regressive-was-2022-a-good-year-for-the-lgbtqia-community-heres-the-year-in-review-546768">Progressive or regressive: Was 2022 a good year for the LGBTQIA+ community? Here's the year in review</a>

On the other hand, Jonathan Covey, policy director of Texas Values, a conservative group that supported the law, hailed the decision and said: "Texas kids are safer today because of the Supreme Court ruling."

"Protecting children from harmful and dangerous gender transition surgeries and puberty blockers is in the best interests of the child and something we all agree on," added Covey.

<h2>From June, till now</h2>

The ban was signed into law by Texas Governor Greg Abbott on 2 June&nbsp;2023. The law which bans medical professionals from prescribing hormone blockers or performing gender-transitioning surgeries on anyone under 18 years old was set to come into effect on September 1.

However, legal advocates of gender-affirming care, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, had filed a lawsuit opposing the ban.

Last week, a state district judge ruled that the pending law infringes upon the rights of transgender minors and their families to access appropriate medical care.&nbsp;

The judge also noted that the law violated doctors' ability to follow "well-established, evidence-based" medical guidelines without risking the loss of their medical licences.

Subsequently, the judge issued a temporary injunction to halt the law's implementation, prompting state officials to&nbsp;appeal the decision to the state's highest court.

<h2>Texas Supreme Court ruling</h2>

The Texas Supreme Court, which, as per AP, is composed entirely of Republican judges, lifted the injunction and allowed the law to take effect as scheduled. They did this without providing an explanation for the decision.&nbsp;

However, their action did not address the lower court's assertion of the law's unconstitutionality, and a full hearing on the matter is expected.

(With inputs from agencies) 
 
&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

The Texas Supreme Court has greenlit a new law banning gender-affirming care for minors. The law will take effect on Friday (September 1st) and will make Texas the most populous US state to impose such restrictions on transgender children.

The Texas Supreme Court has greenlit a new law banning gender-affirming care for minors. The law will take effect on Friday (September 1st) and will make Texas the most populous US state to impose such restrictions on transgender children. Activists and legal advocates have labelled the new law and the court's decision 'cruel', however, conservative groups have welcomed it and say 'kids are safer today'. What the law bans As per a report by news agency AP, the Texas law would prevent transgender minors from accessing treatments such as hormone therapies, puberty blockers, and transition surgeries. Also read | Canada issues travel advisory to LGBTQI+ citizens visiting US, cites new laws, policies The report states that medical experts have long said that such surgical procedures are rarely performed on children. It also stipulates that children who were already undergoing the prohibited medications and treatments are required to be weaned off "the prescription drug over a period of time and in a manner that is safe and medically appropriate." 'Cruel' decision or not Advocacy groups fighting for gender-affirming care in the state on Thursday called the court's decision and the law "cruel" and said that "the fight is far from over." "Transgender youth and their families are forced to confront the start of the school year, fearful of what awaits them. But let us be clear: The fight is far from over," they said in a joint statement. Also read | Progressive or regressive: Was 2022 a good year for the LGBTQIA+ community? Here's the year in review On the other hand, Jonathan Covey, policy director of Texas Values, a conservative group that supported the law, hailed the decision and said: "Texas kids are safer today because of the Supreme Court ruling." "Protecting children from harmful and dangerous gender transition surgeries and puberty blockers is in the best interests of the child and something we all agree on," added Covey. From June, till now The ban was signed into law by Texas Governor Greg Abbott on 2 June 2023. The law which bans medical professionals from prescribing hormone blockers or performing gender-transitioning surgeries on anyone under 18 years old was set to come into effect on September 1. However, legal advocates of gender-affirming care, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, had filed a lawsuit opposing the ban. Last week, a state district judge ruled that the pending law infringes upon the rights of transgender minors and their families to access appropriate medical care. The judge also noted that the law violated doctors' ability to follow "well-established, evidence-based" medical guidelines without risking the loss of their medical licences. Subsequently, the judge issued a temporary injunction to halt the law's implementation, prompting state officials to appeal the decision to the state's highest court. Texas Supreme Court ruling The Texas Supreme Court, which, as per AP, is composed entirely of Republican judges, lifted the injunction and allowed the law to take effect as scheduled. They did this without providing an explanation for the decision. However, their action did not address the lower court's assertion of the law's unconstitutionality, and a full hearing on the matter is expected. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Texas SC greenlights law banning gender-affirming healthcare for trans minors

Canada has issued a travel advisory to its LGBTQI+ community citizens who are planning to visit the United States.&nbsp;

The advisory was reportedly issued due to the rising number of anti-LGBT protests and legal measures that restrict LGBT rights in the country.&nbsp;

<h2>Advisory</h2>

On its website, Global Affairs Canada has issued a specific warning for "2SLGBTQI+".

Here, "2SLGBTQI+" is used to refer to&nbsp;people who identify as two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, or intersex.&nbsp;

Canada's US travel advice page warns that, "Some states have enacted laws and policies that may affect 2SLGBTQI+ persons. Check relevant state and local laws."&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/progressive-or-regressive-was-2022-a-good-year-for-the-lgbtqia-community-heres-the-year-in-review-546768">Progressive or regressive: Was 2022 a good year for the LGBTQIA+ community? Here's the year in review</a>

Such travel advisories as per the BBC are typically reserved for countries like Uganda, Russia, or Egypt.&nbsp;

Talking to CBS news, a spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada pointed to the many laws enacted by US states targeting the transgender community.

"Since the beginning of 2023, certain states in the US have passed laws banning drag shows and restricting the transgender community from access to gender-affirming care and from participation in sporting events," said the spokesperson.

Addressing the government's decision to issue the advisory, Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland emphasised the importance of protecting "particular groups of Canadians".

She said that the government employed experts "to look carefully around the world and to monitor whether there are particular dangers to particular groups of Canadians".

However, as per BBC, she did not comment on whether discussions were held with the US government before implementing the advisory.

<h2>Anti-trans laws and the USA</h2>

In the US, many states have passed hundreds of regulations imposing restrictions on transgender individuals.&nbsp;

In March, Tennessee governor Bill Lee signed laws banning drag performances in front of children and restricting medical treatment for transgender youth.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/in-landmark-decision-brazil-sc-rules-homophobia-punishable-by-prison-628231">In landmark decision, Brazil SC rules homophobia punishable by prison</a>

Just two months later, in May, Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed a similar bill that banned children from undergoing gender-conforming medical treatments. It also restricted the use of pronoun use in classrooms and stopped children from attending drag shows.

Similarly, the previous year (2022) saw conservative states like Texas, Utah, pass regulations limiting the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community.

These measures have drawn concern and criticism from activists and advocacy groups like Human Rights Campaign, who argue that the LGBT community in America was facing a state of emergency as states continue targeting them with legislation.

Canada has issued a travel advisory to its LGBTQI+ community citizens who are planning to visit the United States. The advisory was reportedly issued due to the rising number of anti-LGBT protests and legal measures that restrict LGBT rights in the country.

Canada has issued a travel advisory to its LGBTQI+ community citizens who are planning to visit the United States. The advisory was reportedly issued due to the rising number of anti-LGBT protests and legal measures that restrict LGBT rights in the country. Advisory On its website, Global Affairs Canada has issued a specific warning for "2SLGBTQI+". Here, "2SLGBTQI+" is used to refer to people who identify as two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, or intersex. Canada's US travel advice page warns that, "Some states have enacted laws and policies that may affect 2SLGBTQI+ persons. Check relevant state and local laws." Also read | Progressive or regressive: Was 2022 a good year for the LGBTQIA+ community? Here's the year in review Such travel advisories as per the BBC are typically reserved for countries like Uganda, Russia, or Egypt. Talking to CBS news, a spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada pointed to the many laws enacted by US states targeting the transgender community. "Since the beginning of 2023, certain states in the US have passed laws banning drag shows and restricting the transgender community from access to gender-affirming care and from participation in sporting events," said the spokesperson. Addressing the government's decision to issue the advisory, Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland emphasised the importance of protecting "particular groups of Canadians". She said that the government employed experts "to look carefully around the world and to monitor whether there are particular dangers to particular groups of Canadians". However, as per BBC, she did not comment on whether discussions were held with the US government before implementing the advisory. Anti-trans laws and the USA In the US, many states have passed hundreds of regulations imposing restrictions on transgender individuals. In March, Tennessee governor Bill Lee signed laws banning drag performances in front of children and restricting medical treatment for transgender youth. Also read | In landmark decision, Brazil SC rules homophobia punishable by prison Just two months later, in May, Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed a similar bill that banned children from undergoing gender-conforming medical treatments. It also restricted the use of pronoun use in classrooms and stopped children from attending drag shows. Similarly, the previous year (2022) saw conservative states like Texas, Utah, pass regulations limiting the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community. These measures have drawn concern and criticism from activists and advocacy groups like Human Rights Campaign, who argue that the LGBT community in America was facing a state of emergency as states continue targeting them with legislation.

Canada issues travel advisory to LGBTQI+ citizens visiting US, cites new laws, policies

Democratic Party ruled California is suing a school district for making a rule under which it is required to inform parents if a student asks to change their name or pronoun.

According to the policy adopted by Chino Valley Unified School District, parents must be immediately informed if a student uses facilities or participates in a programme not aligned with the gender assigned to them on paper.

Now, California has sued the school for allegedly violating the state’s constitution and children’s human rights.

<h2>What does the lawsuit say?</h2>

As per the lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, passing over information to parents without obtaining permission from the students for the same amounts to a violation of civil rights laws.

According to a statement issued by Bonta, “Every student has the right to learn and thrive in a school environment that promotes safety, privacy, and inclusivity – regardless of their gender identity.”&nbsp;

“The forced outing policy wrongfully endangers the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of non-conforming students,” he added.

<h2>School district’s arguments</h2>

Chino Valley Unified School District maintains that it protects transgender students under its policies, contrary to allegations levelled by Bonta.&nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;California: Four including shooter dead, six injured in mass shooting incident

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/california-four-including-shooter-dead-six-injured-in-mass-shooting-incident-628675/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

In an emailed statement seen by Bloomberg, the school said, “School district staff are required to notify law enforcement if students believe they’re in danger or have been abused, injured or neglected due to their parent or guardian knowing of their preferred gender identity.”

It added that in such circumstances, it doesn’t notify parents or guardians; instead, it first waits for the investigation by officials to conclude.

<h2>Other similar court cases</h2>

The lawsuit represents the most recent addition to a series of legal cases emerging in courts. Just this month, a federal appeals court situated in Richmond, Virginia, dismissed a challenge from parents who contested the guidelines endorsed by the school board in Montgomery County, Maryland. These guidelines permitted students to formulate gender transition and support plans without involving their parents.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/california-mass-shooting-multiple-people-shot-at-a-bar-at-least-three-dead-628587">Also read:&nbsp;California mass shooting: At least five dead, several injured in bar</a>

Similarly, in May, a court in New Jersey ruled a similar judgement to the one Bonta is seeking in California. It temporarily halted the implementation of a policy by the board of education in Hanover Township, New Jersey. This policy would have required schools to inform parents about the gender identity and sexual orientation of LGBTQ students.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

Democratic Party ruled California is suing a school district for making a rule under which it is required to inform parents if a student asks to change their name or pronoun.

Democratic Party ruled California is suing a school district for making a rule under which it is required to inform parents if a student asks to change their name or pronoun. According to the policy adopted by Chino Valley Unified School District, parents must be immediately informed if a student uses facilities or participates in a programme not aligned with the gender assigned to them on paper. Now, California has sued the school for allegedly violating the state’s constitution and children’s human rights. What does the lawsuit say? As per the lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, passing over information to parents without obtaining permission from the students for the same amounts to a violation of civil rights laws. According to a statement issued by Bonta, “Every student has the right to learn and thrive in a school environment that promotes safety, privacy, and inclusivity – regardless of their gender identity.” “The forced outing policy wrongfully endangers the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of non-conforming students,” he added. School district’s arguments Chino Valley Unified School District maintains that it protects transgender students under its policies, contrary to allegations levelled by Bonta. Watch: California: Four including shooter dead, six injured in mass shooting incident × In an emailed statement seen by Bloomberg, the school said, “School district staff are required to notify law enforcement if students believe they’re in danger or have been abused, injured or neglected due to their parent or guardian knowing of their preferred gender identity.” It added that in such circumstances, it doesn’t notify parents or guardians; instead, it first waits for the investigation by officials to conclude. Other similar court cases The lawsuit represents the most recent addition to a series of legal cases emerging in courts. Just this month, a federal appeals court situated in Richmond, Virginia, dismissed a challenge from parents who contested the guidelines endorsed by the school board in Montgomery County, Maryland. These guidelines permitted students to formulate gender transition and support plans without involving their parents. Also read: California mass shooting: At least five dead, several injured in bar Similarly, in May, a court in New Jersey ruled a similar judgement to the one Bonta is seeking in California. It temporarily halted the implementation of a policy by the board of education in Hanover Township, New Jersey. This policy would have required schools to inform parents about the gender identity and sexual orientation of LGBTQ students. WATCH WION LIVE HERE ×

US: California sues school for informing parents about pronoun changes by students

A California store owner was shot dead Friday after a dispute emerged over displaying of an LGBTQ+ Pride flag at her shop.

The killer reportedly attempted to flee the scene on foot after shooting the 66-year-old victim but was later killed by authorities in an encounter.

San Bernardino County sheriff's deputies responded to Mag.Pi clothing store in Cedar Glen at 5 PM local time. The officials pronounced Laura Ann Carleton dead at the scene. Before shooting the woman, the attacker made "several disparaging remarks about the rainbow flag," said San Bernardino Sheriff's Department.

About Laura Ann Carleton

Carleton, known as "Lauri," was a mother of nine and had a husband, as mentioned on the clothing store's website. She established and managed the Mag.Pi clothing store, commencing her career in the fashion industry from a young age.

Having undergone education at the Art Center School of Design, Carleton held a lengthy fashion career, notably serving for 15 years as an executive at Kenneth Cole, according to the website.

Tributes were offered on social media to honour the shop owner after the tragic shooting incident.

Watch:&nbsp;California coastal communities brace for storm Hilary

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/california-coastal-communities-brace-for-storm-hilary-627519/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"Lauri was a pillar in our community, an immovable force in her values for equality, love, and justice," said a post by Mountain Provisions Cooperative, a local food co-op.

"If you knew Lauri you know she loved hard, laughed often, and nurtured and protected those she cared about," the post added.

<h2>Statement by LGBTQ group</h2>

While a nearby LGBTQ group in Lake Arrowhead clarified that Carleton didn't personally identify as LGBTQ+, they emphasised her dedication to helping and supporting all individuals.

On the night of the shooting, she was defending Pride flags displayed in front of her store.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tropical-storm-hilary-batters-california-flash-floods-and-tornado-warnings-in-place-627375">Also read:&nbsp;Tropical Storm Hilary batters California: Flash-floods and tornado warnings in place</a>

On social media, many people used rainbow flag emojis to honour the store owner.

Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies in various states have been investigating the defacement of rainbow Pride flags as possible hate crimes in recent times.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

A California store owner was shot dead Friday after a dispute emerged over displaying of an LGBTQ+ Pride flag at her shop. The killer reportedly attempted to flee the scene on foot after shooting the 66-year-old victim but was later killed by authorities in an encounter.

A California store owner was shot dead Friday after a dispute emerged over displaying of an LGBTQ+ Pride flag at her shop. The killer reportedly attempted to flee the scene on foot after shooting the 66-year-old victim but was later killed by authorities in an encounter. San Bernardino County sheriff's deputies responded to Mag.Pi clothing store in Cedar Glen at 5 PM local time. The officials pronounced Laura Ann Carleton dead at the scene. Before shooting the woman, the attacker made "several disparaging remarks about the rainbow flag," said San Bernardino Sheriff's Department. About Laura Ann Carleton Carleton, known as "Lauri," was a mother of nine and had a husband, as mentioned on the clothing store's website. She established and managed the Mag.Pi clothing store, commencing her career in the fashion industry from a young age. Having undergone education at the Art Center School of Design, Carleton held a lengthy fashion career, notably serving for 15 years as an executive at Kenneth Cole, according to the website. Tributes were offered on social media to honour the shop owner after the tragic shooting incident. Watch: California coastal communities brace for storm Hilary × "Lauri was a pillar in our community, an immovable force in her values for equality, love, and justice," said a post by Mountain Provisions Cooperative, a local food co-op. "If you knew Lauri you know she loved hard, laughed often, and nurtured and protected those she cared about," the post added. Statement by LGBTQ group While a nearby LGBTQ group in Lake Arrowhead clarified that Carleton didn't personally identify as LGBTQ+, they emphasised her dedication to helping and supporting all individuals. On the night of the shooting, she was defending Pride flags displayed in front of her store. Also read: Tropical Storm Hilary batters California: Flash-floods and tornado warnings in place On social media, many people used rainbow flag emojis to honour the store owner. Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies in various states have been investigating the defacement of rainbow Pride flags as possible hate crimes in recent times. WATCH WION LIVE HERE ×

California woman shot dead for displaying LGBTQ+ Pride flag at her shop

lgbtq

Lgbtq, News on Lgbtq, stories on Lgbtq, articles on Lgbtq, Lgbtq stories at Wion, Lgbtq news, Lgbtq latest news