Rising tensions around the Strait of Hormuz and surging oil prices are pushing countries to rethink their energy future, fast-tracking the global shift to electric vehicles. With Brent crude crossing $100, governments and consumers alike are accelerating the move away from fuel dependency. Affordable EVs, especially from Chinese manufacturers, are gaining ground worldwide, while the number of countries adopting EVs has expanded rapidly.


Hormuz Risk Could Fast Track EV Adoption

Oil prices have skyrocketed amid the Iran war and the alleged blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Taking cognisance of the dire situation, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released an emergency energy playbook, which hasn't kicked in yet, but could if things do not improve. Recommendations include remote work, reducing air travel, and moving to public transportation, among seven other things that countries could implement. While the world is waiting for things to improve in the Middle East, the guidebook has become a cause of panic among commoners. Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz, which created an oil crisis and pushed up fuel prices. Even though Tehran has now claimed that the Strait is open for "non-hostile" operators, the backlog created by the blockade could create prolonged shortages.&nbsp;IEA's guidelines have been made keeping this in mind. The list includes moving to remote work wherever possible to cut down on travel, stressing that three work-from-home days per week could reduce national oil consumption from passenger vehicles by two to six per cent. Travel is the main focus here, so the other guideline asks to reduce flights and air travel to ease the burden on global supplies. IEA also calls to reduce highway speed limits, claiming that reducing speed limits on highways by six miles per hour could lower fuel consumption for each person by five to ten per cent.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-claims-us-israel-targeted-bushehr-nuclear-power-plant-iaea-urges-maximum-restraint-1774384216290">Iran claims US, Israel targeted Bushehr nuclear power plant; IAEA urges ‘maximum restraint’</a>&nbsp;It urges people to halt the use of private cars and shift to public transportation. People have been encouraged to move to carpooling and adopt fuel-efficient driving practices. Maintaining proper tyre pressure, cutting down on air conditioning use and avoiding aggressive acceleration can also help save fuel. &nbsp;Governments have also been advised to divert fuel from vehicles and preserve it for essential usage.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-sends-15-point-plan-peace-plan-tehran-opens-hormuz-for-non-hostile-oil-vessels-no-nuclear-weapon-to-end-of-sanctions-1774403435419">Trump sends 15-point plan peace plan; Tehran opens Hormuz for 'non-hostile' oil vessels</a><h2>Delhi's odd-even scheme for private vehicles</h2>One of the guidelines mirrors what the Delhi government in India adopted a few years ago to fight pollution. It calls for allowing vehicles on roads on alternating days based on license plates. This was a solution that the former Arvind Kejriwal government came up with to cut down on the smog that shrouds the Indian capital every winter. The odd-even scheme permitted a vehicle with an even-numbered license plate on certain days, and those with odd numbers on others.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-secret-talks-hold-balance-between-horrific-war-nervous-peace-1774373411422/embed<h2>Angry netizens compare the suggestions to the lockdown</h2>The IEA stated that the guidelines are meant to help countries stretch fuel supplies and prevent complete deprivation in homes. However, the 10 measures have left netizens infuriated, who are comparing the restrictions to the COVID-19 lockdown. "We're not doing this again," a user wrote. Another took a shot at America for striking Iran, saying, "What about giving up attacking a sovereign country for not submitting to the Epstein Gang's greedy ambitions? Why not solve the supply problem fundamentally, instead of asking ordinary people -who have no responsibility for this crisis- for bulls**t austerity rules to cut demand?"

The oil crisis caused by the Iran war has prompted the IEA to issue 10 guidelines that countries could follow to save fuel. One of them is pretty similar to India's odd-even scheme. Meanwhile, netizens are not happy and think it is just the same as the COVID-19 lockdowns. 

Oil prices have skyrocketed amid the Iran war and the alleged blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Taking cognisance of the dire situation, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released an emergency energy playbook, which hasn't kicked in yet, but could if things do not improve. Recommendations include remote work, reducing air travel, and moving to public transportation, among seven other things that countries could implement. While the world is waiting for things to improve in the Middle East, the guidebook has become a cause of panic among commoners. Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz, which created an oil crisis and pushed up fuel prices. Even though Tehran has now claimed that the Strait is open for "non-hostile" operators, the backlog created by the blockade could create prolonged shortages. IEA's guidelines have been made keeping this in mind. The list includes moving to remote work wherever possible to cut down on travel, stressing that three work-from-home days per week could reduce national oil consumption from passenger vehicles by two to six per cent. Travel is the main focus here, so the other guideline asks to reduce flights and air travel to ease the burden on global supplies. IEA also calls to reduce highway speed limits, claiming that reducing speed limits on highways by six miles per hour could lower fuel consumption for each person by five to ten per cent. Also Read: Iran claims US, Israel targeted Bushehr nuclear power plant; IAEA urges ‘maximum restraint’ It urges people to halt the use of private cars and shift to public transportation. People have been encouraged to move to carpooling and adopt fuel-efficient driving practices. Maintaining proper tyre pressure, cutting down on air conditioning use and avoiding aggressive acceleration can also help save fuel. Governments have also been advised to divert fuel from vehicles and preserve it for essential usage. Also Read: Trump sends 15-point plan peace plan; Tehran opens Hormuz for 'non-hostile' oil vessels Delhi's odd-even scheme for private vehicles One of the guidelines mirrors what the Delhi government in India adopted a few years ago to fight pollution. It calls for allowing vehicles on roads on alternating days based on license plates. This was a solution that the former Arvind Kejriwal government came up with to cut down on the smog that shrouds the Indian capital every winter. The odd-even scheme permitted a vehicle with an even-numbered license plate on certain days, and those with odd numbers on others. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-secret-talks-hold-balance-between-horrific-war-nervous-peace-1774373411422/embed Angry netizens compare the suggestions to the lockdown The IEA stated that the guidelines are meant to help countries stretch fuel supplies and prevent complete deprivation in homes. However, the 10 measures have left netizens infuriated, who are comparing the restrictions to the COVID-19 lockdown. "We're not doing this again," a user wrote. Another took a shot at America for striking Iran, saying, "What about giving up attacking a sovereign country for not submitting to the Epstein Gang's greedy ambitions? Why not solve the supply problem fundamentally, instead of asking ordinary people -who have no responsibility for this crisis- for bulls**t austerity rules to cut demand?"

The oil crisis caused by the Iran war has prompted the IEA to issue 10 guidelines that countries could follow to save fuel. One of them is pretty similar to India's odd-even scheme. Meanwhile, netizens are not happy and think it is just the same as the COVID-19 lockdowns.&nbsp;

Iran War: India's odd-even scheme to fight pollution part of IEA's playbook to save fuel amid oil crisis

As the Iran war enters its fourth week, Tehran, as per reports, has signalled it will no longer engage with President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff or his son-in-law Jared Kushner. According to reports from The Guardian, Tehran is refusing to engage further with Witkoff or Kushner, claiming earlier back-channel talks were a "deception" used to mask preparations for US strikes under Operation Epic Fury. Instead, Tehran has now demanded that another US official lead the talks. Who? US Vice President JD Vance. This demand comes as Pakistan and Oman scramble to host a summit between Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, even as the Trump administration continues its military campaign against Iranian assets.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-patriot-missiles-down-3-american-f-15-jets-over-kuwait-trump-accidentally-reveals-little-mishap-1774396550862">Patriot missiles downed American F-15 jets over Kuwait? Trump reveals 'mishap'</a><h2>Iras says “zero trust” in current US channel</h2>Iranian sources cited in the report said the country had “zero trust” in Washington following the breakdown of earlier talks and the subsequent US strikes, which began more than three weeks ago.Negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme had still been ongoing when the US and Israel launched military action on February 28. Iranian officials now view those discussions as misleading, believing they were used to create a false sense of diplomacy while preparations for strikes were underway."With the previous negotiating team, there’s no chance," one diplomatic source told the publication. "The Iranian side regards the request for negotiations as another round of deception for the US-Israeli regime to find out a loophole to aggravate the strikes again," they added.The same source added that any future engagement would require a change in personnel. "If the negotiations are going to have any outcome, JD Vance should join." they insisted that "With Witkoff and Kushner, nothing will come out of it. We have seen that in the past".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/435-000-barrels-of-oil-at-risk-as-iran-war-drives-up-oil-prices-fire-rages-at-one-of-us-largest-refineries-after-massive-port-arthur-blast-watch-1774325959958">Massive blast rocks Valero’s Port Arthur refinery amid Iran blockade of Strait of Hormuz—is the US energy hub under attack?</a><h2>When will US-Iran talks happen?</h2>There is no clear confirmation from Iran that formal talks are imminent. Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who has been mentioned as a potential lead negotiator on Tehran’s side, has dismissed reports of planned discussions as "fake news." However, as per reports, indirect communication channels remain open.Iran has confirmed that "certain friendly states" have been conveying messages from the US regarding negotiations.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran shuts the door on Trump’s top negotiators: Reports say Tehran now has “zero trust” in the current US channel and is refusing to engage with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.

So, who does Iran want instead to lead talks? Scroll down to find out.

As the Iran war enters its fourth week, Tehran, as per reports, has signalled it will no longer engage with President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff or his son-in-law Jared Kushner. According to reports from The Guardian, Tehran is refusing to engage further with Witkoff or Kushner, claiming earlier back-channel talks were a "deception" used to mask preparations for US strikes under Operation Epic Fury. Instead, Tehran has now demanded that another US official lead the talks. Who? US Vice President JD Vance. This demand comes as Pakistan and Oman scramble to host a summit between Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, even as the Trump administration continues its military campaign against Iranian assets. Also read | Patriot missiles downed American F-15 jets over Kuwait? Trump reveals 'mishap' Iras says “zero trust” in current US channel Iranian sources cited in the report said the country had “zero trust” in Washington following the breakdown of earlier talks and the subsequent US strikes, which began more than three weeks ago. Negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme had still been ongoing when the US and Israel launched military action on February 28. Iranian officials now view those discussions as misleading, believing they were used to create a false sense of diplomacy while preparations for strikes were underway. "With the previous negotiating team, there’s no chance," one diplomatic source told the publication. "The Iranian side regards the request for negotiations as another round of deception for the US-Israeli regime to find out a loophole to aggravate the strikes again," they added. The same source added that any future engagement would require a change in personnel. "If the negotiations are going to have any outcome, JD Vance should join." they insisted that "With Witkoff and Kushner, nothing will come out of it. We have seen that in the past". Also read | Massive blast rocks Valero’s Port Arthur refinery amid Iran blockade of Strait of Hormuz—is the US energy hub under attack? When will US-Iran talks happen? There is no clear confirmation from Iran that formal talks are imminent. Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who has been mentioned as a potential lead negotiator on Tehran’s side, has dismissed reports of planned discussions as "fake news." However, as per reports, indirect communication channels remain open. Iran has confirmed that "certain friendly states" have been conveying messages from the US regarding negotiations. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran shuts the door on Trump’s top negotiators: Reports say Tehran now has “zero trust” in the current US channel and is refusing to engage with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.So, who does Iran want instead to lead talks? Scroll down to find out.

'Zero trust': Iran dumps Witkoff, Kushner as US negotiators, gives ultimatum to Trump: THIS American must lead peace talks

KUWAIT CITY / WASHINGTON: In a stunning departure from military protocol, President Donald Trump has confirmed that the three American F-15 jets shot down over the skies of Kuwait were targeted by the US' own Patriot missiles. Speaking on Tuesday (Mar 24), Trump revealed that Kuwaiti forces—using US-made Patriot missiles—accidentally shot down three allied aircraft after misidentifying them as enemy threats.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/435-000-barrels-of-oil-at-risk-as-iran-war-drives-up-oil-prices-fire-rages-at-one-of-us-largest-refineries-after-massive-port-arthur-blast-watch-1774325959958">Massive blast rocks Valero’s Port Arthur refinery amid Iran blockade of Strait of Hormuz—is the US energy hub under attack?</a><h2>A little mishap?</h2>Speaking to the press in the Oval Office, the President downplayed the March 2 incident as a "little mishap," and said all three pilots of the U.S. F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jets successfully ejected and are "flying today"."They shot down three planes with our missiles. They happen to be our planes," he said, adding that all pilots survived and were already back in action. "The pilots made it… pretty amazing," Trump said. "They’re flying today."Trump insisted that "the Kuwaitis made a mistake, they fired...They thought they were firing at the enemy. It was, as the expression goes, friendly fire." Watch what he said here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Absolute humiliation for the Pentagon. Trump accidentally reveals that US forces shot down THREE of their own allied planes over Kuwait due to sheer incompetence. They are firing multi million dollar missiles at themselves. Total disaster. <a href="https://t.co/dLjKAS0af5">pic.twitter.com/dLjKAS0af5</a>&mdash; Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) <a href="https://twitter.com/FurkanGozukara/status/2036520142289473957?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What happened over Kuwait?</h2>On March 2, the third day of the Iran war, three US F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jets went down during ongoing military operations in the region. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) later confirmed the crash, calling it an "apparent friendly fire" incident during active combat.According to CENTCOM, the aircraft were mistakenly targeted by Kuwaiti air defences while operating in support of a mission. All six crew members ejected safely and were recovered.Kuwait, in its initial response, acknowledged the incident and said "technical measures" were taken in coordination with US forces. An investigation has been launched, but officials have not publicly detailed what went wrong.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/us-s-oil-gambit-how-trump-is-using-iranian-crude-to-bankrupt-tehran-amid-strait-of-hormuz-blockade-in-pics-1774056598032">US's oil gambit: How Trump is using Iranian crude to bankrupt Tehran amid Strait of Hormuz blockade | In Pics</a><h2>Conflicting versions emerge</h2>The situation has become more complicated with new claims surfacing. An earlier report by The Wall Street Journal, citing US officials, said the jets may not have been hit by ground-based systems as initially believed. Instead, it claimed a Kuwaiti Air Force F/A-18 Hornet mistakenly fired three missiles, each striking a US jet.According to that account, a single Hornet pilot launched all three missiles during a moment of confusion as Iranian drones were reportedly entering Kuwaiti airspace.Iranian media, meanwhile, has offered a different version altogether. Semi-official outlets such as Mehr News and Tasnim claimed Iran was responsible for shooting down the aircraft, though no evidence has been presented to support that assertion. &nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp;

Did US-made Patriot missiles just shoot down American jets over Kuwait on March 2? Trump calls it a “little mishap” after three F-15s were hit in a shocking friendly fire incident. What really happened in the skies? Scroll down.

KUWAIT CITY / WASHINGTON: In a stunning departure from military protocol, President Donald Trump has confirmed that the three American F-15 jets shot down over the skies of Kuwait were targeted by the US' own Patriot missiles. Speaking on Tuesday (Mar 24), Trump revealed that Kuwaiti forces—using US-made Patriot missiles—accidentally shot down three allied aircraft after misidentifying them as enemy threats. Also read | Massive blast rocks Valero’s Port Arthur refinery amid Iran blockade of Strait of Hormuz—is the US energy hub under attack? A little mishap? Speaking to the press in the Oval Office, the President downplayed the March 2 incident as a "little mishap," and said all three pilots of the U.S. F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jets successfully ejected and are "flying today". "They shot down three planes with our missiles. They happen to be our planes," he said, adding that all pilots survived and were already back in action. "The pilots made it… pretty amazing," Trump said. "They’re flying today." Trump insisted that "the Kuwaitis made a mistake, they fired...They thought they were firing at the enemy. It was, as the expression goes, friendly fire." Watch what he said here:

Did US-made Patriot missiles just shoot down American jets over Kuwait on March 2? Trump calls it a “little mishap” after three F-15s were hit in a shocking friendly fire incident. What really happened in the skies? Scroll down.

Did Patriot missiles down 3 American F-15 jets over Kuwait? Trump accidentally reveals 'little mishap' | Watch

India is already feeling the economic heat of the Iran war, with prices rising across sectors—from flight tickets and fuel to cars, appliances, and daily essentials. Surging crude oil costs, supply disruptions, and a weakening rupee are driving inflation. Here’s a detailed breakdown of what’s getting costlier, by how much, and why.

Iran War Impact: What’s Getting Expensive in India & Why Prices Are Rising Fast

As confusion over negotiations between Iran and the United States persists, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to meet G7 counterparts in France on Friday, the State Department announced on Tuesday (March 24). The visit will mark the first by Rubio since the United States and Israel launched a bombing campaign against Iran on February 28.&nbsp;The meeting comes amid uncertainty over a potential deal between Tehran and Washington regarding the ongoing war, with US allies also facing strain due to rising energy prices. On Monday, Donald Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic efforts aimed at reaching a “complete and total resolution” of hostilities in the region.&nbsp;Notably, the US President underlined that instructions to the Department of Defence are contingent upon the continued progress of these detailed and constructive talks, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week.&nbsp;The discussions are expected to focus on the Russia-Ukraine war, the situation in West Asia, and broader threats to global peace and stability, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mohammad-bagher-zolghadr-replaces-slain-ali-larijani-as-iran-s-top-security-chief-all-you-need-to-know-1774353260209">Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr replaces slain Ali Larijani as Iran’s top security chief; all you need to know</a>&nbsp;France currently holds the presidency of the Group of Seven (G7), which includes Britain, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States.&nbsp;While all G7 nations are close US allies, none has unequivocally supported the assault on Iran, reportedly angering Trump and adding strain to ties, including over his Greenland proposal.&nbsp;However, Iran has officially dismissed Trump’s assertion that the two countries are engaged in “very good and productive” conversations to resolve the conflict.&nbsp;G7 foreign ministers on Saturday also urged an “immediate and unconditional” end to Iranian attacks on US allies in West Asia.&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

France currently holds the presidency of the Group of Seven (G7), which includes Britain, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States.

As confusion over negotiations between Iran and the United States persists, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to meet G7 counterparts in France on Friday, the State Department announced on Tuesday (March 24). The visit will mark the first by Rubio since the United States and Israel launched a bombing campaign against Iran on February 28. The meeting comes amid uncertainty over a potential deal between Tehran and Washington regarding the ongoing war, with US allies also facing strain due to rising energy prices. On Monday, Donald Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic efforts aimed at reaching a “complete and total resolution” of hostilities in the region. Notably, the US President underlined that instructions to the Department of Defence are contingent upon the continued progress of these detailed and constructive talks, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week. The discussions are expected to focus on the Russia-Ukraine war, the situation in West Asia, and broader threats to global peace and stability, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said. Also Read: Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr replaces slain Ali Larijani as Iran’s top security chief; all you need to know France currently holds the presidency of the Group of Seven (G7), which includes Britain, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States. While all G7 nations are close US allies, none has unequivocally supported the assault on Iran, reportedly angering Trump and adding strain to ties, including over his Greenland proposal. However, Iran has officially dismissed Trump’s assertion that the two countries are engaged in “very good and productive” conversations to resolve the conflict. G7 foreign ministers on Saturday also urged an “immediate and unconditional” end to Iranian attacks on US allies in West Asia. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

France currently holds the presidency of the Group of Seven (G7), which includes Britain, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States.

US top diplomat Marco Rubio to meet G7 counterparts in France to discuss Iran war

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi holds a call with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov, after US President Donald Trump revealed Washington and Tehran had held “very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities.”

Russia’s Lavrov called for an “immediate cessation of hostilities and a political settlement that takes into account the legitimate interests of all parties involved, above all Iran,” the Russian foreign ministry says in a readout of the call, which it said was initiated by Tehran.

Israel-Iran War: Iranian FM Holds Call With Russia After US-Iran War Talks

Violence continues across West Asia despite US President Donald Trump pausing planned strikes on Iran’s energy grid. The temporary halt follows reported talks, but tensions remain high across the region. Experts warn the situation is still volatile, with risks of escalation impacting global security and oil markets worldwide.


Israel-Iran War: Trump Halts Strikes on Iran's Energy Grid 

What began as a modest initiative by members of the Shia community in the Kashmir Valley to raise funds for war-affected people in Iran has rapidly transformed into one of the region’s greatest humanitarian efforts in recent memory. The donation drive has now grown into a valley-wide movement, drawing participation from all communities and transcending religious and social boundaries.&nbsp;In an extraordinary display of unity, Sunni Muslims across the valley have joined the campaign in large numbers. The initiative has also received overwhelming support from Hindu and Sikh communities, reflecting a rare collective spirit of compassion and solidarity.&nbsp;Adding momentum to the drive, the Grand Mufti of the Kashmir Valley publicly urged members of the Sunni community to actively participate. He emphasised that the cause rises above sectarian and religious divisions, calling on every section of society to contribute. “This is a humanitarian responsibility that belongs to all of us. This is the time we give as much as we can for the people of Iran ,” he stated.&nbsp;"This campaign was initiated by the Shia community, but the Sunni community, with men, women, and children, has also participated in large numbers, contributing jewellery, cash, and whatever they could. We have also seen participation from Hindus and Sikhs. The brutality of American and Israeli forces, particularly in the killing of Saeed Ali Khamenei, has united people from all communities. Hindus, Sikhs, and others are now standing together against this oppression by Israel," said Syed Ghazanfar, A local.&nbsp;Over the past week, donation camps have been set up across every district in the valley, witnessing massive public turnout. People from all walks of life have stepped forward to contribute in whatever way they can. Women have been seen donating personal jewellery, including gold and silver ornaments, while others have brought copper utensils as offerings.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/23-years-after-kashmir-s-nadimarg-massacre-pandits-return-muslims-join-in-tribute-1774354421306">23 years after Kashmir's Nadimarg massacre, pandits return; Muslims join in tribute</a>&nbsp;In rural areas, some individuals have donated livestock, including cattle, while many others have contributed cash and cheques. Particularly moving scenes have emerged from donation centres where hundreds of children arrived carrying their piggy banks, willingly parting with their savings to support the Iranian People.&nbsp;"I’ve been here for quite some time, observing the people who have come to donate. Just a while ago, four to five women from the Sunni community donated their jewellery and cash. We stand in solidarity with the people of Iran. While none of the neighbouring countries is stepping forward to help, we want to show the world that we support the people as they resist this oppression," &nbsp;said Mohd Shafi, A local.&nbsp;Organisers estimate that nearly ₹500 crore Indian Rupees have already been collected across the Kashmir Valley, with expectations that the figure will rise further in the coming days as the campaign continues to gather momentum.The initiative stands as a powerful testament to Kashmir’s enduring spirit of unity and generosity, showcasing how humanitarian causes can bring together diverse communities in times of global crisis.

Over the past week, donation camps have been set up across every district in the valley, witnessing massive public turnout. People from all walks of life have stepped forward to contribute in whatever way they can.

What began as a modest initiative by members of the Shia community in the Kashmir Valley to raise funds for war-affected people in Iran has rapidly transformed into one of the region’s greatest humanitarian efforts in recent memory. The donation drive has now grown into a valley-wide movement, drawing participation from all communities and transcending religious and social boundaries. In an extraordinary display of unity, Sunni Muslims across the valley have joined the campaign in large numbers. The initiative has also received overwhelming support from Hindu and Sikh communities, reflecting a rare collective spirit of compassion and solidarity. Adding momentum to the drive, the Grand Mufti of the Kashmir Valley publicly urged members of the Sunni community to actively participate. He emphasised that the cause rises above sectarian and religious divisions, calling on every section of society to contribute. “This is a humanitarian responsibility that belongs to all of us. This is the time we give as much as we can for the people of Iran ,” he stated. "This campaign was initiated by the Shia community, but the Sunni community, with men, women, and children, has also participated in large numbers, contributing jewellery, cash, and whatever they could. We have also seen participation from Hindus and Sikhs. The brutality of American and Israeli forces, particularly in the killing of Saeed Ali Khamenei, has united people from all communities. Hindus, Sikhs, and others are now standing together against this oppression by Israel," said Syed Ghazanfar, A local. Over the past week, donation camps have been set up across every district in the valley, witnessing massive public turnout. People from all walks of life have stepped forward to contribute in whatever way they can. Women have been seen donating personal jewellery, including gold and silver ornaments, while others have brought copper utensils as offerings. Also Read: 23 years after Kashmir's Nadimarg massacre, pandits return; Muslims join in tribute In rural areas, some individuals have donated livestock, including cattle, while many others have contributed cash and cheques. Particularly moving scenes have emerged from donation centres where hundreds of children arrived carrying their piggy banks, willingly parting with their savings to support the Iranian People. "I’ve been here for quite some time, observing the people who have come to donate. Just a while ago, four to five women from the Sunni community donated their jewellery and cash. We stand in solidarity with the people of Iran. While none of the neighbouring countries is stepping forward to help, we want to show the world that we support the people as they resist this oppression," said Mohd Shafi, A local. Organisers estimate that nearly ₹500 crore Indian Rupees have already been collected across the Kashmir Valley, with expectations that the figure will rise further in the coming days as the campaign continues to gather momentum. The initiative stands as a powerful testament to Kashmir’s enduring spirit of unity and generosity, showcasing how humanitarian causes can bring together diverse communities in times of global crisis.

Over the past week, donation camps have been set up across every district in the valley, witnessing massive public turnout. People from all walks of life have stepped forward to contribute in whatever way they can.

Shia, Sunni, Hindu, Sikh together: Kashmir’s unprecedented humanitarian effort for Iran

As confusion over a deal between Iran and the United States regarding the ongoing war persists, Revolutionary Guards on Tuesday (March 24) threatened to conduct “heavy” missile and drone attacks on Israel in support of Lebanese and Palestinian civilians.&nbsp;“We warn the regime's criminal army that if its crimes against civilians in Lebanon and Palestine persist, Israeli forces will be the target of heavy missile and drone strikes,” the Guards said in a statement.&nbsp;Israel has been targeting Gaza and Lebanon over Hamas and Hezbollah since the October 7, 2023, attack. It escalated these attacks on Lebanon after the US-Israel coalition started its bombing campaign in Iran targeting Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the top Iranian leadership.&nbsp;These warnings from Iran’s powerful Guards come as many conflicting reports on the status of the ongoing US–Israel–Iran conflict persist, after US President Donald Trump on Monday announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a “complete and total resolution” of hostilities in the region.&nbsp;Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of Defence is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week.However, Iran officially dismissed Donald Trump’s assertion that the two countries are engaged in “very good and productive” conversations to resolve the war.<h2>Iran vows ‘heavy’ missile fire on Israel</h2>Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday that the military will take control of southern Lebanon all the way to the Litani River.&nbsp;“All five bridges over the Litani that were used by Hezbollah for the passage of terrorists and weapons have been blown up, and the IDF (Israeli military) will control the rest of the bridges and the security zone up to the Litani,” Katz said during a visit to a military command centre in Israel.&nbsp;Katz added that the hundreds of thousands of South Lebanon residents who were displaced by the Middle East war this month “will not return south of the Litani River until security is guaranteed for the residents of northern Israel.”&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Israel has been targeting Gaza and Lebanon over Hamas and Hezbollah since the October 7, 2023, attack. It escalated these attacks on Lebanon after the US-Israel coalition started its bombing campaign in Iran.

As confusion over a deal between Iran and the United States regarding the ongoing war persists, Revolutionary Guards on Tuesday (March 24) threatened to conduct “heavy” missile and drone attacks on Israel in support of Lebanese and Palestinian civilians. “We warn the regime's criminal army that if its crimes against civilians in Lebanon and Palestine persist, Israeli forces will be the target of heavy missile and drone strikes,” the Guards said in a statement. Israel has been targeting Gaza and Lebanon over Hamas and Hezbollah since the October 7, 2023, attack. It escalated these attacks on Lebanon after the US-Israel coalition started its bombing campaign in Iran targeting Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the top Iranian leadership. These warnings from Iran’s powerful Guards come as many conflicting reports on the status of the ongoing US–Israel–Iran conflict persist, after US President Donald Trump on Monday announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a “complete and total resolution” of hostilities in the region. Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of Defence is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week. However, Iran officially dismissed Donald Trump’s assertion that the two countries are engaged in “very good and productive” conversations to resolve the war. Iran vows ‘heavy’ missile fire on Israel Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday that the military will take control of southern Lebanon all the way to the Litani River. “All five bridges over the Litani that were used by Hezbollah for the passage of terrorists and weapons have been blown up, and the IDF (Israeli military) will control the rest of the bridges and the security zone up to the Litani,” Katz said during a visit to a military command centre in Israel. Katz added that the hundreds of thousands of South Lebanon residents who were displaced by the Middle East war this month “will not return south of the Litani River until security is guaranteed for the residents of northern Israel.” (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Israel has been targeting Gaza and Lebanon over Hamas and Hezbollah since the October 7, 2023, attack. It escalated these attacks on Lebanon after the US-Israel coalition started its bombing campaign in Iran.

Iran vows missile and drone attacks on Israel to support Lebanese and Palestinians

Ukraine says it has “irrefutable” evidence that Russia is providing intelligence to Iran, potentially prolonging the West Asia conflict and aiding Tehran’s targeting of U.S. and allied forces. Moscow denies these claims while global tensions over missile, regional strategy, and diplomatic fallout intensify amid the wider Middle East crisis.

Russia “Prolonging West Asia War” as Zelensky Claims Irrefutable Intelligence Support To Iran

Reports say Iran fired missiles toward the joint US‑UK base on Diego Garcia, but Tehran denies the attack, calling it a “false flag.” NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Donald Trump warn that Iran’s missile and nuclear programs pose grave global security risks, urging vigilance and coordinated defense measures.

Iran Denies Diego Garcia Attack | Rutte, Trump Warn on Missile and Nuclear Threats

Russia has issued a stern warning to Israel and the United States, cautioning against extending the war into the Caspian region. Officials say any escalation would be viewed extremely negatively. Global security experts are closely monitoring developments, as tensions rise and potential regional conflicts could have far-reaching consequences.

Breaking: Russia Warns Israel, US Against Expanding War to Caspian Region 

The war in West Asia has sparked fears of recession in Europe as business activity in the Eurozone slowed in March following the start of the conflict on February 28, leading to a surge in energy prices and causing significant supply chain disruptions, according to a survey published on Tuesday (March 24).&nbsp;The HCOB Flash Eurozone Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), published by S&amp;P Global, an important gauge of the overall health of the economy, registered a significantly lower figure of 50.5 this month, down from 51.9 in February.&nbsp;A reading above 50 indicates growth, while a figure below 50 shows contraction.&nbsp;Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation against the United States and Israel, through which nearly 20 per cent of global oil transits. Brent crude is oscillating between $101 and $104 per barrel, putting immediate pressure on input costs for European firms and forcing several countries to take emergency measures such as rationing and prioritising gas.&nbsp;The 21-country Eurozone bloc, which includes Germany, France and Austria, has come under a “double shock”, with the West Asia conflict and the protracted war in Ukraine creating a period of stagflationary pressure.&nbsp;On Monday, Donald Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a “complete and total resolution” of hostilities in the region.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-blocking-strait-of-hormuz-is-unacceptable-pm-modi-notes-india-made-pathways-through-dialogue-1774341188579">PM Modi rejects Hormuz blockade; reveals secret diplomatic pathway for Indian ships</a>&nbsp;Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of Defence is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week.&nbsp;However, Iran officially dismissed Donald Trump’s assertion that the two countries are engaged in “very good and productive” conversations to resolve the war.&nbsp;The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US-Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high-ranking military commanders.&nbsp;Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes.

The 21-country Eurozone bloc, which includes Germany, France and Austria, has come under a “double shock”, with the West Asia conflict and the protracted war in Ukraine creating a period of stagflationary pressure.

The war in West Asia has sparked fears of recession in Europe as business activity in the Eurozone slowed in March following the start of the conflict on February 28, leading to a surge in energy prices and causing significant supply chain disruptions, according to a survey published on Tuesday (March 24). The HCOB Flash Eurozone Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), published by S&P Global, an important gauge of the overall health of the economy, registered a significantly lower figure of 50.5 this month, down from 51.9 in February. A reading above 50 indicates growth, while a figure below 50 shows contraction. Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation against the United States and Israel, through which nearly 20 per cent of global oil transits. Brent crude is oscillating between $101 and $104 per barrel, putting immediate pressure on input costs for European firms and forcing several countries to take emergency measures such as rationing and prioritising gas. The 21-country Eurozone bloc, which includes Germany, France and Austria, has come under a “double shock”, with the West Asia conflict and the protracted war in Ukraine creating a period of stagflationary pressure. On Monday, Donald Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a “complete and total resolution” of hostilities in the region. Also Read: PM Modi rejects Hormuz blockade; reveals secret diplomatic pathway for Indian ships Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of Defence is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week. However, Iran officially dismissed Donald Trump’s assertion that the two countries are engaged in “very good and productive” conversations to resolve the war. The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US-Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high-ranking military commanders. Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes.

The 21-country Eurozone bloc, which includes Germany, France and Austria, has come under a “double shock”, with the West Asia conflict and the protracted war in Ukraine creating a period of stagflationary pressure.

Recession fears in Europe as Eurozone business activity slows amid Iran war

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is supporting the government's proposal for a ₹573-billion (approx. $6.2 billion-$6.8 billion) Economic Stabilisation Fund to mitigate supply chain disruptions and unexpected external shocks. Highlighted in the March 2026 bulletin, this fund aims to strengthen India's resilience against global headwinds, including West Asia geopolitical tensions, oil price volatility, and high-frequency economic volatility. 


India: RBI Proposes Stabilisation Fund To Tackle Global Shocks

Amid the chaos around the Iran war, with Hezbollah and Iraqi Shia militias stepping in, and Israel facing relentless missile fire - a little-known Israeli doctrine is back in focus. Often whispered about but rarely discussed openly, the “Samson Option” is believed to be Israel’s ultimate, last-resort nuclear policy, one reserved for the gravest existential threats. The idea itself is stark: if Israel were ever pushed to the brink of destruction, it would not go down alone.&nbsp;The renewed attention on this doctrine comes amid an intensifying, multi-front conflict that traces back to the October 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas. Since then, Israel has found itself engaged across several fronts, with tensions escalating far beyond Gaza.&nbsp;On March 3, Iranian forces claimed they targeted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office using a Kheibar hypersonic missile. While Iranian statements suggested a dramatic strike, Israeli media reported no casualties, highlighting the fog of war and propaganda that surrounds the conflict.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-no-direct-or-indirect-talks-iran-denies-conversation-with-trump-after-us-prez-claims-detailed-constructive-talks-1774268919778">‘No direct or indirect talks’: Iran denies conversation with Trump after US prez claims 'detailed, constructive’ talks</a>&nbsp;What is clearer, however, is the posture of Iran’s powerful military arm, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Security analysts widely believe the IRGC operates with a “fight to the last” doctrine - prepared to exhaust its arsenal rather than concede defeat. Yet Israel, too, is believed to operate under a similar, if far more ominous, philosophy.<h2>Israel’s nuclear ambiguity</h2>Unlike declared nuclear powers, Israel has long maintained a policy of deliberate ambiguity. It neither confirms nor denies possessing nuclear weapons, a stance that has shaped its strategic posture for decades.&nbsp;This ambiguity dates back at least to the Cold War era. A key moment came in 1979, when a US satellite known as Vela 6911 detected a double flash over the Indian Ocean - widely interpreted by intelligence analysts as evidence of a nuclear test, possibly conducted by Israel with support from apartheid-era South Africa. The administration of Jimmy Carter, however, stopped short of officially confirming that conclusion.&nbsp;Since then, Israel’s silence has worked to its advantage. By not acknowledging its nuclear capability, it has avoided the kind of sanctions faced by countries like India after its 1998 nuclear tests - while still benefiting from the deterrence such weapons provide.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-you-re-fired-irgc-mocks-trump-using-his-signature-phrase-after-us-president-s-hit-and-obliterate-warning-over-hormuz-1774249474894">‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz</a>&nbsp;Independent estimates suggest Israel possesses around 90 nuclear warheads, with enough fissile material to produce significantly more. Analysts also believe it has a full “nuclear triad,” the ability to launch weapons from air, land, and sea, along with tactical nuclear options designed for battlefield use.<h2>The ‘Samson Option’ explained</h2>The term “Samson Option” draws from the biblical figure Samson, who, after being captured and blinded, brought down a temple upon himself and his enemies, killing everyone inside. In strategic terms, the doctrine represents a similar idea: if Israel faces imminent destruction, it could resort to nuclear weapons on a massive scale, even if it means catastrophic consequences for itself and the region.&nbsp;Experts say Israel has never formally outlined such a doctrine. But, as noted by analysts like Kelsey Davenport of the Arms Control Association, reading between the lines of official statements and military planning suggests such a contingency exists. The Federation of American Scientists has also described the Samson Option as a key, if implicit, component of Israel’s deterrence strategy.<h2>A message of deterrence</h2>At its core, the Samson Option is less about actual use and more about signalling. It serves as a warning: any attempt to destroy Israel would come at an unbearable cost. In that sense, it mirrors Cold War-era doctrines like Dead Hand - a semi-automated system designed to ensure nuclear retaliation even if a country’s leadership were wiped out.&nbsp;The message is blunt and unmistakable. If Israel is pushed to the edge, it will ensure that its enemies fall with it. In a region already on edge, that possibility, however remote, adds a deeply unsettling dimension to an already volatile war.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Amid escalating Iran war tensions, Israel’s shadowy “Samson Option” resurfaces, an alleged last-resort nuclear doctrine signalling massive retaliation if existence is threatened, reinforcing deterrence through ambiguity and fear of catastrophic consequences.

Amid the chaos around the Iran war, with Hezbollah and Iraqi Shia militias stepping in, and Israel facing relentless missile fire - a little-known Israeli doctrine is back in focus. Often whispered about but rarely discussed openly, the “Samson Option” is believed to be Israel’s ultimate, last-resort nuclear policy, one reserved for the gravest existential threats. The idea itself is stark: if Israel were ever pushed to the brink of destruction, it would not go down alone. The renewed attention on this doctrine comes amid an intensifying, multi-front conflict that traces back to the October 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas. Since then, Israel has found itself engaged across several fronts, with tensions escalating far beyond Gaza. On March 3, Iranian forces claimed they targeted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office using a Kheibar hypersonic missile. While Iranian statements suggested a dramatic strike, Israeli media reported no casualties, highlighting the fog of war and propaganda that surrounds the conflict. Also read: ‘No direct or indirect talks’: Iran denies conversation with Trump after US prez claims 'detailed, constructive’ talks What is clearer, however, is the posture of Iran’s powerful military arm, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Security analysts widely believe the IRGC operates with a “fight to the last” doctrine - prepared to exhaust its arsenal rather than concede defeat. Yet Israel, too, is believed to operate under a similar, if far more ominous, philosophy. Israel’s nuclear ambiguity Unlike declared nuclear powers, Israel has long maintained a policy of deliberate ambiguity. It neither confirms nor denies possessing nuclear weapons, a stance that has shaped its strategic posture for decades. This ambiguity dates back at least to the Cold War era. A key moment came in 1979, when a US satellite known as Vela 6911 detected a double flash over the Indian Ocean - widely interpreted by intelligence analysts as evidence of a nuclear test, possibly conducted by Israel with support from apartheid-era South Africa. The administration of Jimmy Carter, however, stopped short of officially confirming that conclusion. Since then, Israel’s silence has worked to its advantage. By not acknowledging its nuclear capability, it has avoided the kind of sanctions faced by countries like India after its 1998 nuclear tests - while still benefiting from the deterrence such weapons provide. Also read: ‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz Independent estimates suggest Israel possesses around 90 nuclear warheads, with enough fissile material to produce significantly more. Analysts also believe it has a full “nuclear triad,” the ability to launch weapons from air, land, and sea, along with tactical nuclear options designed for battlefield use. The ‘Samson Option’ explained The term “Samson Option” draws from the biblical figure Samson, who, after being captured and blinded, brought down a temple upon himself and his enemies, killing everyone inside. In strategic terms, the doctrine represents a similar idea: if Israel faces imminent destruction, it could resort to nuclear weapons on a massive scale, even if it means catastrophic consequences for itself and the region. Experts say Israel has never formally outlined such a doctrine. But, as noted by analysts like Kelsey Davenport of the Arms Control Association, reading between the lines of official statements and military planning suggests such a contingency exists. The Federation of American Scientists has also described the Samson Option as a key, if implicit, component of Israel’s deterrence strategy. A message of deterrence At its core, the Samson Option is less about actual use and more about signalling. It serves as a warning: any attempt to destroy Israel would come at an unbearable cost. In that sense, it mirrors Cold War-era doctrines like Dead Hand - a semi-automated system designed to ensure nuclear retaliation even if a country’s leadership were wiped out. The message is blunt and unmistakable. If Israel is pushed to the edge, it will ensure that its enemies fall with it. In a region already on edge, that possibility, however remote, adds a deeply unsettling dimension to an already volatile war. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Amid escalating Iran war tensions, Israel’s shadowy “Samson Option” resurfaces, an alleged last-resort nuclear doctrine signalling massive retaliation if existence is threatened, reinforcing deterrence through ambiguity and fear of catastrophic consequences.

The ‘Samson Option’: Israel’s SECRET nuclear doctrine back in focus amid Iran war

A Financial Times report states that just minutes before Trump announced a halt to Iran strikes, massive bets were placed in the oil market, amounting to billions of dollars. A sudden flurry of activity was reported in the oil market between 6:49 am and 6:50 am ET.

A Financial Times report states that just minutes before Trump announced a halt to Iran strikes, massive bets were placed in the oil market, amounting to billions of dollars. A sudden flurry of activity was reported in the oil market between 6:49 am and 6:50 am ET.

Rs 5,373 crore in mystery oil bets placed 15 minutes before Trump's Iran talks post: Report

&nbsp;President Trump’s unilateral postponement of strikes on power infrastructure in Iran, a threat/ultimatum he gave for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, citing “Good and Productive Conversation”, which Iran denied. It seems Iranian resilience, counter-threats and counter-strikes like Dimona have brought a TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) moment for him. Is the war heading towards de-escalation, or is Trump buying time for bigger action remains uncertain.Four weeks into the coordinated US-Israeli air campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran, a clear strategic lesson emerges for students of modern warfare: tactical air superiority cannot substitute for a viable political end-state. Operations “Epic Fury” and “Rising Lion” have showcased the coalition’s ability to inflict high-intensity degradation, yet they have not led to the expected systemic collapse in Tehran. The coalition now faces the hard limits of standoff power when used against a state prepared for prolonged "Strategic Endurance" and "Asymmetric Defiance."&nbsp;<h2>A Clash of Strategic Cultures</h2>The ongoing conflict is not a conventional war of attrition but a clash of strategic cultures. Iran uses a "Mosaic Defence" that is intended to use geographic depth, terrain friction, and international economic interdependencies as long-lasting levers of deterrence, while the coalition uses "Shock and Awe" through integrated multi-domain operations and technological superiority.Strategic Miscalculation: Maximalist Goals vs. Realistic ResultsThe US-Israeli campaign is predicated on a strategic miscalculation: the idea that domestic regime change could be sparked by overwhelming military force. This "maximalist" strategy, which calls for the "Unconditional Surrender" of a regional power, ignores past examples like Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, where the capacity to destroy targets did not equate to the capacity to maintain peace.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-sets-these-conditions-to-end-israel-us-war-after-trump-s-5-day-halt-closure-of-us-bases-to-hormuz-control-1774326659739">Iran sets THESE conditions to end war after Trump's 5-day halt: From closure of US bases to Hormuz control - Full list</a>&nbsp;<h2>The Strategic Vacuum of the JCPoA Withdrawal</h2>The roots of this confrontation trace back to the 2018 unilateral withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA). By abandoning a multilateral framework that provided verification and restraint, Washington created a strategic vacuum. The expectation was that "Maximum Pressure" would produce a "better deal" addressing Iran’s ballistic missile programmes and regional proxy networks. However, without a credible diplomatic off-ramp, the progression from economic sanctions to military strikes became inevitable and flawed. It’s true that diplomacy without the credible threat of force is weak, but force without a diplomatic objective is aimless.Also Read: &nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-claims-war-pause-iran-reports-new-strikes-on-isfahan-and-khorramshahr-energy-sites-1774331004518">Trump claims war pause; Iran reports new strikes on Isfahan and Khorramshahr energy sites</a><h2>Domestic Drivers and the "Maduro Fallacy"</h2>In the context of a sequel to military action, it is essential to scrutinise the domestic motivations of the Trump and Netanyahu administrations. Both have sought to use military "victories" to offset internal political volatility, ranging from Epstein files and tariff controversies in the US and legal and political challenges in Israel. There was a clear hope that eliminating top Iranian leaders would galvanise public opinion against the clerical regime. They seem to have fallen into the "Maduro Fallacy"—assuming that tactics used in Venezuela could be replicated in a country with four times the territory of Iraq and a much deeper ideological and military infrastructure.&nbsp;<h2>The Intelligence Gap</h2>The justification for "imminent threat" proved intellectually thin. Key US officials, including Joe Kent and Intelligence Chief Tulsi Gabbard, previously indicated that Iran posed no immediate ICBM threat to the American mainland. This suggests that the strikes are less about immediate defence and more about broader strategic objectives: disrupting Chinese energy lifelines and preserving the dominance of the petrodollar against emerging Eurasian alternatives.&nbsp;<h2>Operational Art: Iran’s "Mosaic Defence" and Strategic Endurance</h2>In analysing Iranian operational art, it is evident that Tehran has avoided conventional "force-on-force" engagements in favour of a decentralised, asymmetric model, central to which is the Mosaic Defence, a strategy which focuses on decentralising power across local commanders and ensuring that forces can continue operating based on broad guidelines, even if top leadership is eliminated. The IRGC had previously assigned some successors to important positions and transferred control down the ranks. Despite the top hierarchy's removal, missile strikes, drone swarms, marine disruption, and proxy operations have persisted.&nbsp;As conventional ammunition stocks dwindle and military capabilities get degraded, Iran may transition to Asymmetric War: shifting to "harassing fire"—rationing drones and missiles to launch sporadic, unpredictable attacks that keep adversaries engaged at a very heavy cost, and disrupt commerce for a prolonged period.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-talks-who-is-mohammad-bagher-ghalibaf-iran-speaker-in-spotlight-amid-trump-claim-1774333790343/embed&nbsp;<h2>Using Terrain Friction as Force Multiplier</h2>Iran's most effective deterrent is its ability to shut the Strait of Hormuz, which is vital to the global energy supply. By threatening 20% of the world's oil supply, Tehran has imposed a "Global Inflationary Tax." This represents a masterclass in hybrid warfare; Iran is not just confronting the US Navy but also the US economy. The resulting volatility in energy prices and shipping insurance feeds directly into the American domestic political landscape, increasing pressure on President Trump through the inflation he promised to control.&nbsp;<h2>Strategic Friction: The Human and Material Calculus</h2>The coalition’s dependence on standoff airpower has reached the point of diminishing returns. While nuclear-related sites and IRGC naval bases have been targeted, breaking the national will has proved elusive.&nbsp;<h2>The Unintended Unifier</h2>Military science teaches us to identify the "Centre of Gravity." The coalition assumed this was the regime, but collateral damage—such as the tragic deaths of schoolgirls in Minab and destruction of energy hubs like the South Pars Gas Field—shifted the centre of gravity to the Iranian people's sense of national sovereignty. A collective resolve to resist external, unjustified, offensive forces has momentarily eclipsed internal disgruntlement against the Khameini regime.&nbsp;<h2>The Obliteration Myth</h2>Iran's tactical defiance is still strong despite severe military and infrastructural degradation. The shooting down of an F-35 and missile strikes reaching Diego Garcia in the fourth week of the war have shattered the coalition’s aura of invincibility. As long as Iran maintains its "missile cities" hidden in mountain tunnels, it cannot be "obliterated" by airpower alone. Achieving a definitive victory would require a costly ground invasion—a "Boots on the Ground" scenario that neither Washington nor Tel Aviv is prepared to pursue.&nbsp;<h2>Resilient Leadership: The Emergence of the "Revenge Doctrine"</h2>The new Supreme Leader, Mustafa Khamenei, represents a shift toward a more radicalised and defiant posture. Having lost his father, wife, and children in enemy strikes, he is viewed as a leader without the "fear of death," which reinforces a doctrine of revenge and regime survival. All new leaders seem more hardened than those killed.&nbsp;<h2>Geopolitical Realignment: The Eurasian Pivot</h2>The battle is accelerating a fundamental shift in the global order, bringing the world closer to a "Multipolar Reality."&nbsp;Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran now engage in strategic coordination in addition to intelligence sharing. Rising oil prices and the diversion of Western resources benefit Russia, which improves its own standing in Ukraine. In the meantime, China watches as the United States, its main adversary, depletes military capacity, munitions and morale in the Middle East, depriving its power projection capability in the Indo-Pacific, losing out in long-term “Big Power Contestation”. &nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>The Indian Strategic Calculations</h2>The uncompromisable energy dependence of India on the Persian Gulf makes this conflict a direct threat to our national interests.Energy Security: Because India depends on Gulf gas and oil, disruptions at Hormuz affect the country's budget deficit and drive up domestic prices. This crisis highlights the accelerating diversification of our sources of gas and oil globally.Diaspora: Since over nine million Indians in the Gulf rely heavily on their remittances to maintain our economy, it is imperative that they be protected.Strategic Autonomy: With events like the strike on Bandar Anjali, connectivity projects like the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and the Chabahar Port—our entry point to Central Asia—face existential uncertainty. India’s exercise of “Strategic Autonomy” and multilateral engagements found itself in a slightly better position than many others in navigating this economic and energy crisis so far, vindicating its long-term diplomatic strategy. &nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Emerging Scenarios</h2>The war was started by the U.S. and Israel, and they retain the initiative to shape future scenarios. Two most likely scenarios seem to be realistic.&nbsp;The "Declared Victory" Exit: President Trump could unilaterally declare that coalition objectives have been achieved and create a scenario of meaningful talks, and find an exit with compromises. His five-day pause on strikes on the power grid could well be a precursor to it. By claiming a "mission accomplished" moment, he may withdraw to stabilise energy markets. However, this would leave a militarily weakened but ideologically hardened Iran, convinced that only a nuclear deterrent guarantees survival, claiming victory over a superpower and putting up unrealistic demands for negotiations.&nbsp;Extended Regional Conflict: President Trump could use the declared pause to build up for limited ground action like limited ground actions on Iranian islands like Kharg or the Strait of Hormuz coastline. This could result in a dangerous escalation of tit-for-tat strikes on nuclear establishments and water salination plants, with catastrophic consequences and an extended regional campaign involving the "Axis of Resistance" (Hezbollah, Houthis, and militias). In this case, oil prices may shoot above $140 per barrel for a long time, which would be disastrous for the world economy. &nbsp;The future trajectory and end state of war, therefore, remain uncertain.&nbsp;<h2>Conclusion: Strategic Lessons &nbsp;</h2>A hard reality is exposed by the Iran-Trump conflict: technological dominance and operational skill cannot take the place of well-defined political objectives. Although the US and Israel have demonstrated their ability to destroy targets at will, they will continue to struggle to achieve their unrealistic aims, such as Iranian surrender, dictating regime selection to a sovereign country, not to enrich uranium, or not to have missiles for its defence. So far, Iran has shown that asymmetric military superiority alone can’t capitulate a determined nation. &nbsp;&nbsp;The use of geographic configurations like the Strait of Hormuz as strategic leverage in a war has been well demonstrated by Iran, with a lesson for India to plan contingencies for the Malacca Strait in our national interest in combat scenarios. &nbsp;&nbsp;The most crucial strategic lesson is that military force must always be employed to achieve a clear, viable political objective. Without an "Exit Strategy" or a "Diplomatic End-State," the alliance could win a tactical battle but lose the strategic fight for regional dominance and ‘Big Power Contestation’.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

“Without a "Exit Strategy" or a "Diplomatic End-State," the alliance could win a tactical battle but lose the strategic fight for regional dominance in ‘Big Power Contestation”.

President Trump’s unilateral postponement of strikes on power infrastructure in Iran, a threat/ultimatum he gave for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, citing “Good and Productive Conversation”, which Iran denied. It seems Iranian resilience, counter-threats and counter-strikes like Dimona have brought a TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) moment for him. Is the war heading towards de-escalation, or is Trump buying time for bigger action remains uncertain. Four weeks into the coordinated US-Israeli air campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran, a clear strategic lesson emerges for students of modern warfare: tactical air superiority cannot substitute for a viable political end-state. Operations “Epic Fury” and “Rising Lion” have showcased the coalition’s ability to inflict high-intensity degradation, yet they have not led to the expected systemic collapse in Tehran. The coalition now faces the hard limits of standoff power when used against a state prepared for prolonged "Strategic Endurance" and "Asymmetric Defiance." A Clash of Strategic Cultures The ongoing conflict is not a conventional war of attrition but a clash of strategic cultures. Iran uses a "Mosaic Defence" that is intended to use geographic depth, terrain friction, and international economic interdependencies as long-lasting levers of deterrence, while the coalition uses "Shock and Awe" through integrated multi-domain operations and technological superiority. Strategic Miscalculation: Maximalist Goals vs. Realistic Results The US-Israeli campaign is predicated on a strategic miscalculation: the idea that domestic regime change could be sparked by overwhelming military force. This "maximalist" strategy, which calls for the "Unconditional Surrender" of a regional power, ignores past examples like Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, where the capacity to destroy targets did not equate to the capacity to maintain peace. Also Read: Iran sets THESE conditions to end war after Trump's 5-day halt: From closure of US bases to Hormuz control - Full list The Strategic Vacuum of the JCPoA Withdrawal The roots of this confrontation trace back to the 2018 unilateral withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA). By abandoning a multilateral framework that provided verification and restraint, Washington created a strategic vacuum. The expectation was that "Maximum Pressure" would produce a "better deal" addressing Iran’s ballistic missile programmes and regional proxy networks. However, without a credible diplomatic off-ramp, the progression from economic sanctions to military strikes became inevitable and flawed. It’s true that diplomacy without the credible threat of force is weak, but force without a diplomatic objective is aimless. Also Read: Trump claims war pause; Iran reports new strikes on Isfahan and Khorramshahr energy sites Domestic Drivers and the "Maduro Fallacy" In the context of a sequel to military action, it is essential to scrutinise the domestic motivations of the Trump and Netanyahu administrations. Both have sought to use military "victories" to offset internal political volatility, ranging from Epstein files and tariff controversies in the US and legal and political challenges in Israel. There was a clear hope that eliminating top Iranian leaders would galvanise public opinion against the clerical regime. They seem to have fallen into the "Maduro Fallacy"—assuming that tactics used in Venezuela could be replicated in a country with four times the territory of Iraq and a much deeper ideological and military infrastructure. The Intelligence Gap The justification for "imminent threat" proved intellectually thin. Key US officials, including Joe Kent and Intelligence Chief Tulsi Gabbard, previously indicated that Iran posed no immediate ICBM threat to the American mainland. This suggests that the strikes are less about immediate defence and more about broader strategic objectives: disrupting Chinese energy lifelines and preserving the dominance of the petrodollar against emerging Eurasian alternatives. Operational Art: Iran’s "Mosaic Defence" and Strategic Endurance In analysing Iranian operational art, it is evident that Tehran has avoided conventional "force-on-force" engagements in favour of a decentralised, asymmetric model, central to which is the Mosaic Defence, a strategy which focuses on decentralising power across local commanders and ensuring that forces can continue operating based on broad guidelines, even if top leadership is eliminated. The IRGC had previously assigned some successors to important positions and transferred control down the ranks. Despite the top hierarchy's removal, missile strikes, drone swarms, marine disruption, and proxy operations have persisted. As conventional ammunition stocks dwindle and military capabilities get degraded, Iran may transition to Asymmetric War: shifting to "harassing fire"—rationing drones and missiles to launch sporadic, unpredictable attacks that keep adversaries engaged at a very heavy cost, and disrupt commerce for a prolonged period. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-talks-who-is-mohammad-bagher-ghalibaf-iran-speaker-in-spotlight-amid-trump-claim-1774333790343/embed Using Terrain Friction as Force Multiplier Iran's most effective deterrent is its ability to shut the Strait of Hormuz, which is vital to the global energy supply. By threatening 20% of the world's oil supply, Tehran has imposed a "Global Inflationary Tax." This represents a masterclass in hybrid warfare; Iran is not just confronting the US Navy but also the US economy. The resulting volatility in energy prices and shipping insurance feeds directly into the American domestic political landscape, increasing pressure on President Trump through the inflation he promised to control. Strategic Friction: The Human and Material Calculus The coalition’s dependence on standoff airpower has reached the point of diminishing returns. While nuclear-related sites and IRGC naval bases have been targeted, breaking the national will has proved elusive. The Unintended Unifier Military science teaches us to identify the "Centre of Gravity." The coalition assumed this was the regime, but collateral damage—such as the tragic deaths of schoolgirls in Minab and destruction of energy hubs like the South Pars Gas Field—shifted the centre of gravity to the Iranian people's sense of national sovereignty. A collective resolve to resist external, unjustified, offensive forces has momentarily eclipsed internal disgruntlement against the Khameini regime. The Obliteration Myth Iran's tactical defiance is still strong despite severe military and infrastructural degradation. The shooting down of an F-35 and missile strikes reaching Diego Garcia in the fourth week of the war have shattered the coalition’s aura of invincibility. As long as Iran maintains its "missile cities" hidden in mountain tunnels, it cannot be "obliterated" by airpower alone. Achieving a definitive victory would require a costly ground invasion—a "Boots on the Ground" scenario that neither Washington nor Tel Aviv is prepared to pursue. Resilient Leadership: The Emergence of the "Revenge Doctrine" The new Supreme Leader, Mustafa Khamenei, represents a shift toward a more radicalised and defiant posture. Having lost his father, wife, and children in enemy strikes, he is viewed as a leader without the "fear of death," which reinforces a doctrine of revenge and regime survival. All new leaders seem more hardened than those killed. Geopolitical Realignment: The Eurasian Pivot The battle is accelerating a fundamental shift in the global order, bringing the world closer to a "Multipolar Reality." Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran now engage in strategic coordination in addition to intelligence sharing. Rising oil prices and the diversion of Western resources benefit Russia, which improves its own standing in Ukraine. In the meantime, China watches as the United States, its main adversary, depletes military capacity, munitions and morale in the Middle East, depriving its power projection capability in the Indo-Pacific, losing out in long-term “Big Power Contestation”. The Indian Strategic Calculations The uncompromisable energy dependence of India on the Persian Gulf makes this conflict a direct threat to our national interests. Energy Security: Because India depends on Gulf gas and oil, disruptions at Hormuz affect the country's budget deficit and drive up domestic prices. This crisis highlights the accelerating diversification of our sources of gas and oil globally. Diaspora: Since over nine million Indians in the Gulf rely heavily on their remittances to maintain our economy, it is imperative that they be protected. Strategic Autonomy: With events like the strike on Bandar Anjali, connectivity projects like the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and the Chabahar Port—our entry point to Central Asia—face existential uncertainty. India’s exercise of “Strategic Autonomy” and multilateral engagements found itself in a slightly better position than many others in navigating this economic and energy crisis so far, vindicating its long-term diplomatic strategy. Emerging Scenarios The war was started by the U.S. and Israel, and they retain the initiative to shape future scenarios. Two most likely scenarios seem to be realistic. The "Declared Victory" Exit: President Trump could unilaterally declare that coalition objectives have been achieved and create a scenario of meaningful talks, and find an exit with compromises. His five-day pause on strikes on the power grid could well be a precursor to it. By claiming a "mission accomplished" moment, he may withdraw to stabilise energy markets. However, this would leave a militarily weakened but ideologically hardened Iran, convinced that only a nuclear deterrent guarantees survival, claiming victory over a superpower and putting up unrealistic demands for negotiations. Extended Regional Conflict: President Trump could use the declared pause to build up for limited ground action like limited ground actions on Iranian islands like Kharg or the Strait of Hormuz coastline. This could result in a dangerous escalation of tit-for-tat strikes on nuclear establishments and water salination plants, with catastrophic consequences and an extended regional campaign involving the "Axis of Resistance" (Hezbollah, Houthis, and militias). In this case, oil prices may shoot above $140 per barrel for a long time, which would be disastrous for the world economy. The future trajectory and end state of war, therefore, remain uncertain. Conclusion: Strategic Lessons A hard reality is exposed by the Iran-Trump conflict: technological dominance and operational skill cannot take the place of well-defined political objectives. Although the US and Israel have demonstrated their ability to destroy targets at will, they will continue to struggle to achieve their unrealistic aims, such as Iranian surrender, dictating regime selection to a sovereign country, not to enrich uranium, or not to have missiles for its defence. So far, Iran has shown that asymmetric military superiority alone can’t capitulate a determined nation. The use of geographic configurations like the Strait of Hormuz as strategic leverage in a war has been well demonstrated by Iran, with a lesson for India to plan contingencies for the Malacca Strait in our national interest in combat scenarios. The most crucial strategic lesson is that military force must always be employed to achieve a clear, viable political objective. Without an "Exit Strategy" or a "Diplomatic End-State," the alliance could win a tactical battle but lose the strategic fight for regional dominance and ‘Big Power Contestation’. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

“Without a "Exit Strategy" or a "Diplomatic End-State," the alliance could win a tactical battle but lose the strategic fight for regional dominance in ‘Big Power Contestation”.

Has Iran created a TACO moment for Trump? Decoding strategies and limits of military power

The Strait of Hormuz isn’t just an oil route: it’s a lifeline for the global economy. A shutdown could disrupt up to $2–2.3 billion worth of oil every single day, sending shockwaves through supply chains worldwide. From aviation and shipping to plastics, chemicals and even fertilisers, the ripple effects would hit multiple industries. With nearly 30% of global fertiliser trade also passing through this narrow corridor, the fallout could stretch far beyond energy markets.


Iran War: When Hormuz Stops, World Pays the Price 

U.S. Special Envoy Vance reportedly spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss a potential peace deal amid ongoing regional tensions. The conversation signals diplomatic efforts to de-escalate conflicts in the Middle East and explores steps toward negotiation and resolution between the parties.

Netanyahu, JD Vance Discuss Potential Iran Deal

A massive explosion at the Valero Port Arthur Refinery sent shockwaves through the US energy sector on Monday (Mar 23). As the nation grapples with an oil spike due to the West Asia war, one of America's largest fuel hubs—capable of processing 435,000 barrels per day—is now under emergency lockdown. Local authorities have ordered residents in the surrounding area to stay indoors as thick black smoke billows over East Texas. The blast threatens to knock 435,000 barrels of refining capacity offline at a moment when US President Donald Trump is attempting to negotiate with Tehran amid the Iran war. It comes as Brent crude went up 3.7 per cent to $103.60 per barrel as the Strait of Hormuz remains under an effective 90 per cent blockade by the IRGC—wiping out 8 million barrels of daily global supply.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/us-s-oil-gambit-how-trump-is-using-iranian-crude-to-bankrupt-tehran-amid-strait-of-hormuz-blockade-in-pics-1774056598032">US's oil gambit: How Trump is using Iranian crude to bankrupt Tehran amid Strait of Hormuz blockade | In Pics</a><h2>Shelter-in-place alert issued</h2>The explosion occurred at Valero’s Port Arthur Refinery, located roughly 90 miles east of Houston. Local emergency management officials issued a shelter-in-place alert shortly after the blast, urging people in nearby areas to remain inside as a precaution."To ensure the safety of all residents in the vicinity and in light of the recent explosion at the Valero refinery, an immediate shelter in place is ordered," officials said in a public alert. The advisory covered a wide area around the refinery. Visuals from the scene show tall flames and a plume of black smoke rising from the refinery. Watch here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨 BREAKING: Massive explosion at Valero’s Port Arthur refinery. One of the largest in the U.S. (335,000+ barrels/day). Black smoke. Active fire. Cause unknown. All happening as global oil supply is already under pressure from the Iran war — with major disruptions hitting… <a href="https://t.co/NU7VmLci6t">pic.twitter.com/NU7VmLci6t</a>&mdash; Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) <a href="https://twitter.com/allenanalysis/status/2036244596900909227?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Valero confirmed that a fire had broken out in one of the refinery’s processing units. "Currently, there is a fire in a unit at Valero's Port Arthur, Texas refinery. All personnel have been accounted for," the company said in a statement, adding that worker safety remains its top priority.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mission-accomplished-trump-reveals-5-iran-war-goals-announces-surprise-exit-strategy-as-us-nears-victory-what-are-they-and-is-the-war-ending-soon-1774045708559">Trump announces surprise exit strategy, reveals 5 Iran war goals US 'very close to meeting' — what are they, and is the war ending soon?</a><h2>Death toll of Texas oil refinery explosion</h2>At the time of this report's publication, there were no official statements on any deaths or injuries. Local media footage showed large flames rising from the site, accompanied by thick black smoke billowing into the sky. Residents in nearby neighbourhoods reported hearing a loud explosion that shook windows and buildings.The cause of the blast has not yet been determined, and authorities have not said how long the shelter-in-place order will remain in effect.<h2>How important is the Port Arthur refinery?</h2>The Texas-based Port Arthur refinery is one of the largest in the United States. According to Valero, the facility processes "heavy sour crude oil and other feedstocks into gasoline, diesel and jet fuel". It has a capacity of about 435,000 barrels per day and employs nearly 800 workers.

Explosion rocks one of America’s largest oil refineries - Valero Port Arthur Refinery, as global prices surge amid the Iran war. With 435,000 barrels at risk and black smoke over Texas, fears of a supply shock grow. What does this mean for energy markets? Scroll down.

A massive explosion at the Valero Port Arthur Refinery sent shockwaves through the US energy sector on Monday (Mar 23). As the nation grapples with an oil spike due to the West Asia war, one of America's largest fuel hubs—capable of processing 435,000 barrels per day—is now under emergency lockdown. Local authorities have ordered residents in the surrounding area to stay indoors as thick black smoke billows over East Texas. The blast threatens to knock 435,000 barrels of refining capacity offline at a moment when US President Donald Trump is attempting to negotiate with Tehran amid the Iran war. It comes as Brent crude went up 3.7 per cent to $103.60 per barrel as the Strait of Hormuz remains under an effective 90 per cent blockade by the IRGC—wiping out 8 million barrels of daily global supply. Also read | US's oil gambit: How Trump is using Iranian crude to bankrupt Tehran amid Strait of Hormuz blockade | In Pics Shelter-in-place alert issued The explosion occurred at Valero’s Port Arthur Refinery, located roughly 90 miles east of Houston. Local emergency management officials issued a shelter-in-place alert shortly after the blast, urging people in nearby areas to remain inside as a precaution. "To ensure the safety of all residents in the vicinity and in light of the recent explosion at the Valero refinery, an immediate shelter in place is ordered," officials said in a public alert. The advisory covered a wide area around the refinery. Visuals from the scene show tall flames and a plume of black smoke rising from the refinery. Watch here:

Explosion rocks one of America’s largest oil refineries - Valero Port Arthur Refinery, as global prices surge amid the Iran war. With 435,000 barrels at risk and black smoke over Texas, fears of a supply shock grow. What does this mean for energy markets? Scroll down.

Massive blast rocks Valero’s Port Arthur refinery amid Iran blockade of Strait of Hormuz—is the US energy hub under attack?

Iran War: Hormuz Closure Could Disrupt Billions In Global Trade Daily

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Monday held a detailed telephonic conversation with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, focusing on the ongoing West Asia conflict and its implications for global energy security. In a post on X, Jaishankar said that both leaders also discussed the global economic implications due to the conflict. "Had a detailed telecon this evening with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Our discussions focused on the West Asia conflict and its impact on the international economy. We particularly spoke about energy security concerns. Agreed to remain in touch," the post read.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Had a detailed telecon this evening with US <a href="https://twitter.com/SecRubio?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SecRubio</a>. Our discussions focused on the West Asia conflict and its impact on the international economy. We particularly spoke about energy security concerns. Agreed to remain in touch.&mdash; Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrSJaishankar/status/2036130508833431784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The discussions came after US President Donald Trump, earlier today, announced that he had instructed the US Department of War to delay any military action against Iranian power plants and energy sites for five days, citing ongoing diplomatic engagements with Tehran amid escalating tensions in West Asia. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the United States and Iran had held "very good and productive conversations" over the past two days aimed at resolving hostilities in the region. He added that the decision to pause strikes was based on the "tenor and tone" of the discussions, which he described as "in-depth, detailed, and constructive". Trump further stated that the conversations will continue through the week. "I am please to report that the United States of America, and the country of Iran, have had, over the last two days, very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East," the post read."Based on the tenor and tone of these in depth, detailed, and constructive conversations, witch will continue throughout the week, I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy Infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" it added. The announcement came as the war between Israel, the US, and Iran had entered its fourth week. However, Iran has categorically denied the claim of talks made by Trump. Speaker of Iran's Parliament, MB Ghalibaf, rejected Trump's claims regarding ongoing negotiations between Tehran and Washington, asserting that no such talks have taken place. In a series of posts on X, Ghalibaf rejected the US President's claims, stating that the remarks were made to "manipulate the financial and oil markets", which have seen much disruption amid the conflict. He further stated that the remark was made to get the US and Israel out of the "quagmire", referring to the war against the Islamic Republic. "No negotiations have been held with the US, and fakenews is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped," the speaker stated in his post. "Iranian people demand complete and remorseful punishment of the aggressors. All Iranian officials stand firmly behind their supreme leader and people until this goal is achieved," he added.

India, US discuss Iran war impact as Trump pauses strikes. S Jaishankar and Marco Rubio spoke on energy risks and global economy. In a post on X, Jaishankar said that both leaders also discussed the global economic implications due to the conflict.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Monday held a detailed telephonic conversation with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, focusing on the ongoing West Asia conflict and its implications for global energy security. In a post on X, Jaishankar said that both leaders also discussed the global economic implications due to the conflict. "Had a detailed telecon this evening with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Our discussions focused on the West Asia conflict and its impact on the international economy. We particularly spoke about energy security concerns. Agreed to remain in touch," the post read.

India, US discuss Iran war impact as Trump pauses strikes. S Jaishankar and Marco Rubio spoke on energy risks and global economy. In a post on X, Jaishankar said that both leaders also discussed the global economic implications due to the conflict.

Jaishankar, Rubio discuss energy risks amid Iran war

U.S. President Donald Trump says the U.S. and Iran have had “very good” conversations and that Tehran wants to make a deal — but insists any agreement must include Iran giving up its enriched uranium stockpile. Trump says eliminating that stockpile is essential to ending the conflict and preventing nuclear escalation.


US-Iran War: Trump Speaks on 'Iran Talks', Says This Time Iran Means Business

A massive security crisis is unfolding in Israel after the US-made THAAD system failed to intercept an Iranian missile targeting the Dimona nuclear facility on Saturday. An initial inquiry suggests the interception was missed. We break down the world's most advanced defence system and why it failed when it mattered most.


Iran Hits Israel's 'Nuclear Site'| THAAD Fails at Dimona | Israel Orders Probe

The Enforcement Directorate has sent notices to Indians who used credit cards to buy property in Dubai. These transactions may violate Reserve Bank of India rules. Buyers now face penalties, legal scrutiny and possible losses as the market weakens due to West Asia War.


ED Sends Notice To Indians Buying Properties In Dubai With Credit Cards

U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said there have been talks between the United States and Iran over the past day in ​which the two sides had "major points of agreement," adding that a deal could be done soon ‌to settle the war.
Trump said his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and close aide and son-in-law Jared Kushner talked to the Iranians on Sunday and that discussions would continue on Monday.

US-Iran War: Is Trump Looking For Off-Ramp From Iran War?

US-Iran War: Trump Postpones Strikes on Iran's Power Plants

Trump: US, Iran Talks Have Major Points of Agreement

A fresh layer of confusion has emerged over backchannel diplomacy between the US and Iran after Donald Trump claimed he held talks with Iranian representatives, an assertion that Tehran has categorically denied.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-you-re-fired-irgc-mocks-trump-using-his-signature-phrase-after-us-president-s-hit-and-obliterate-warning-over-hormuz-1774249474894">‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz</a>&nbsp;Speaking to CNBC, Trump said discussions had taken place with “representatives” of Iran and described the situation as tantamount to “regime change,” citing the killing and replacement of several Iranian leaders. However, he stopped short of identifying who exactly the US had engaged with, only adding that the talks involved a “respected” Iranian figure.<h2>Iran rejects claim, raises questions over Trump’s contacts</h2>Iranian authorities have firmly denied any direct or indirect communication with Washington, creating a stark contradiction. The denial has intensified speculation over whether Trump’s claims refer to unofficial intermediaries, dissident figures, or parallel diplomatic channels operating outside Tehran’s control.&nbsp;The ambiguity surrounding Trump’s statement, particularly his refusal or inability to name specific interlocutors, has raised critical questions about the legitimacy and credibility of the alleged talks.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-lawmaker-moves-to-recognise-pakistan-s-1971-atrocities-against-bengali-hindus-as-genocide-details-inside-1774168728838">US lawmaker moves to recognise Pakistan’s 1971 atrocities against Bangladeshi Hindus as ‘Genocide’. Details inside</a>&nbsp;Trump’s reference to a “respected” Iranian leader has further deepened the mystery. Without confirmation from Tehran, it remains unclear whether this individual holds any formal authority within Iran’s power structure or represents an external opposition group. The lack of clarity has also fueled concerns among analysts that the US may be engaging with figures who do not have the mandate to negotiate on behalf of the Iranian state.&nbsp;In another striking remark, Trump said he had not heard from Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, and admitted uncertainty over whether he was still alive. He added that he did not want the Iranian leader to be killed. The statement has added to the overall opacity surrounding the situation, particularly at a time when leadership stability in Iran is under intense global scrutiny.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Donald Trump claims talks with Iranian representatives spark confusion as Iran denies contact, raising questions about intermediaries, legitimacy, and unclear diplomatic channels.

A fresh layer of confusion has emerged over backchannel diplomacy between the US and Iran after Donald Trump claimed he held talks with Iranian representatives, an assertion that Tehran has categorically denied. Also read: ‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz Speaking to CNBC, Trump said discussions had taken place with “representatives” of Iran and described the situation as tantamount to “regime change,” citing the killing and replacement of several Iranian leaders. However, he stopped short of identifying who exactly the US had engaged with, only adding that the talks involved a “respected” Iranian figure. Iran rejects claim, raises questions over Trump’s contacts Iranian authorities have firmly denied any direct or indirect communication with Washington, creating a stark contradiction. The denial has intensified speculation over whether Trump’s claims refer to unofficial intermediaries, dissident figures, or parallel diplomatic channels operating outside Tehran’s control. The ambiguity surrounding Trump’s statement, particularly his refusal or inability to name specific interlocutors, has raised critical questions about the legitimacy and credibility of the alleged talks. Also read: US lawmaker moves to recognise Pakistan’s 1971 atrocities against Bangladeshi Hindus as ‘Genocide’. Details inside Trump’s reference to a “respected” Iranian leader has further deepened the mystery. Without confirmation from Tehran, it remains unclear whether this individual holds any formal authority within Iran’s power structure or represents an external opposition group. The lack of clarity has also fueled concerns among analysts that the US may be engaging with figures who do not have the mandate to negotiate on behalf of the Iranian state. In another striking remark, Trump said he had not heard from Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, and admitted uncertainty over whether he was still alive. He added that he did not want the Iranian leader to be killed. The statement has added to the overall opacity surrounding the situation, particularly at a time when leadership stability in Iran is under intense global scrutiny. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Donald Trump claims talks with Iranian representatives spark confusion as Iran denies contact, raising questions about intermediaries, legitimacy, and unclear diplomatic channels.

Who did Trump have ‘constructive’ talks with? US president says it’s Iran’s 'representative’, but not Mojtaba Khamenei

iran-war

Iran War, News on Iran War, stories on Iran War, articles on Iran War, Iran War stories at Wion, Iran War news, Iran War latest news

iran war

Hormuz Risk Could Fast Track EV Adoption

India's odd-even scheme part of IEA's playbook to save fuel amid oil crisis

Hormuz Risk Could Fast Track EV Adoption

'Zero trust': Iran dumps Witkoff, Kushner; wants THIS official for peace talks

Patriot missiles downed American F-15 jets over Kuwait? Trump reveals 'mishap'

Iran War Impact: What’s Getting Expensive in India & Why Prices Are Rising Fast

Marco Rubio to meet G7 counterparts in France to discuss Iran war

Israel-Iran War: Iranian FM Holds Call With Russia After US-Iran War Talks

Israel-Iran War: Trump Halts Strikes on Iran's Energy Grid

Shia, Sunni, Hindu, Sikh together: Kashmir’s big humanitarian effort for Iran

Iran vows missile, drone attacks on Israel to support Lebanese and Palestinians

Russia “Prolonging West Asia War” as Zelensky Claims Irrefutable Intelligence Support To Iran

Iran Denies Diego Garcia Attack | Rutte, Trump Warn on Missile and Nuclear Threats

Breaking: Russia Warns Israel, US Against Expanding War to Caspian Region

Recession fears in Europe as Eurozone business activity slows amid Iran war

India: RBI Proposes Stabilisation Fund To Tackle Global Shocks

The ‘Samson Option’: Israel’s SECRET nuclear doctrine

Rs 5,373 crore oil bets placed 15 minutes before Trump's Iran talks post: Report

Has Iran created a TACO moment for Trump? Decoding strategies and limits

Iran War: When Hormuz Stops, World Pays the Price

Netanyahu, JD Vance Discuss Potential Iran Deal

Massive blast rocks US' Valero refinery—is the US energy hub under attack? VIDEO

Iran War: Hormuz Closure Could Disrupt Billions In Global Trade Daily

Jaishankar, Rubio discuss energy risks amid Iran war

US-Iran War: Trump Speaks on 'Iran Talks', Says This Time Iran Means Business

Iran Hits Israel's 'Nuclear Site'| THAAD Fails at Dimona | Israel Orders Probe