Despite leading the team ranking chart in the One-Day Internationals, none of the Indian players made it to ICC&rsquo;s ODI Team of the Year 2024. Four Sri Lankan players, including their ODI captain Charith Asalanka, three Pakistanis, two from Afghanistan and one from West Indies, made it to the combined XI of the top ODI players from the past year.
To everyone&rsquo;s surprise, no player from the top-ranked sides, including Australia, India, England, New Zealand and South Africa, made the cut.
Meanwhile, after a super successful 2023, where India won the Asia Cup in Sri Lanka and made it to the final of the home ODI World Cup, the Men in Blue played just three ODIs last year, losing two to Sri Lanka, conceding the bilateral series for the first time in 27 years; as a result, none could find a place.
<h2>Openers and middle order &ndash;</h2>
Rookie Pakistan opener Saim Ayub got rewarded for his impressive year with the bat, wherein he returned 515 runs from nine outings, averaging 64.37 and striking at over 100 (105.53). In 2024, Ayub scored two ODI hundreds and a fifty. Afghanistan opener Rahmanullah Gurbaz accompanies him at the top, having registered almost similar runs (531) from 11 matches, including three centuries and two fifties.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/sam-konstas-on-shoulder-bump-with-kohli-its-good-to-have-a-bit-of-theatre-in-the-game-8649673" rel="dofollow">Konstas on shoulder bump with Kohli: &lsquo;It&rsquo;s good to have a bit of theatre in the game&rsquo;</a>
Three Sri Lankan batters, a West Indian and an all-rounder from Afghanistan, completed the middle and lower orders. Opener Pathum Nissanka (who scored 210* against Afghanistan in an ODI in February last year) bats at number three (on ICC's list), with keeper-batter Kusal Mendis and Asalanka taking the number four and fifth spots respectively.
While Mendis had a fantastic 2024, scoring 742 runs from 17 matches, the left-handed Asalanka averaged over 50 (50.2) playing in the middle overs, besides scoring 605 runs in 16 outings.
However, the breakthrough inclusion is of West Indies batter Sherfane Rutherford, who had a stellar 2024. The left-handed batter scored 425 runs, averaging a whopping 106 and striking at 120.1. Azmatullah Omarzai comes in at number seven for having scored 417 runs and picking 17 wickets across 12 ODIs in the past year.
<h2>The bowlers</h2>
Of the four bowlers, two are from Pakistan and one each from Afghanistan and Sri Lanka.&nbsp;
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/boost-for-australia-as-test-specialist-cleared-for-sri-lanka-tests-matthew-kuhnemann-steve-smith-8649272" rel="dofollow">Boost for Australia as Test specialist cleared of injury for Sri Lanka Tests</a>
The two pacers picked are Shaheen Afridi and Haris Rauf, who picked 15 and 13 wickets, respectively. While Shaheen bagged those at a bowling average of 17.6, Rauf&rsquo;s read 22.4.&nbsp;
The two remaining bowlers are the spinners, Wanindu Hasaranga from Sri Lanka and Allah Ghazanfar from Afghanistan. Hasaranga was perhaps the best bowler of the year, picking 26 wickets from 10 matches, averaging just 15.6, while teenager Ghazanfar had a better bowling average of 13.57, bagging 21 wickets from 11 games.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m6ak3xm6-zox1visa-upxv0io8">
Presenting the ICC Men&rsquo;s ODI Team of the Year 2024 featuring the finest players from around the world 👏 <a href="https://t.co/ic4BSXlXCc">pic.twitter.com/ic4BSXlXCc</a>
&mdash; ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1882692313392251067?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 24, 2025</a></blockquote>
<h2>Here is ICC&rsquo;s ODI Team of the Year 2024 &ndash;</h2>
Saim Ayub, Rahmanullah Gurbaz, Pathum Nissanka, Kusal Mendis, Charith Asalanka (captain), Sherfane Rutherford, Azmatullah Omarzai, Wanindu Hasaranga, Shaheen Afridi, Haris Rauf and Allah Ghazanfar
(With inputs from agencies)

Cricket Sports: To everyone’s surprise, no player from the top-ranked sides, including Australia, India, England, New Zealand and South Africa, made the cut.

Despite leading the team ranking chart in the One-Day Internationals, none of the Indian players made it to ICC’s ODI Team of the Year 2024. Four Sri Lankan players, including their ODI captain Charith Asalanka, three Pakistanis, two from Afghanistan and one from West Indies, made it to the combined XI of the top ODI players from the past year. To everyone’s surprise, no player from the top-ranked sides, including Australia, India, England, New Zealand and South Africa, made the cut. Meanwhile, after a super successful 2023, where India won the Asia Cup in Sri Lanka and made it to the final of the home ODI World Cup, the Men in Blue played just three ODIs last year, losing two to Sri Lanka, conceding the bilateral series for the first time in 27 years; as a result, none could find a place. Openers and middle order – Rookie Pakistan opener Saim Ayub got rewarded for his impressive year with the bat, wherein he returned 515 runs from nine outings, averaging 64.37 and striking at over 100 (105.53). In 2024, Ayub scored two ODI hundreds and a fifty. Afghanistan opener Rahmanullah Gurbaz accompanies him at the top, having registered almost similar runs (531) from 11 matches, including three centuries and two fifties. Also read | Konstas on shoulder bump with Kohli: ‘It’s good to have a bit of theatre in the game’ Three Sri Lankan batters, a West Indian and an all-rounder from Afghanistan, completed the middle and lower orders. Opener Pathum Nissanka (who scored 210* against Afghanistan in an ODI in February last year) bats at number three (on ICC's list), with keeper-batter Kusal Mendis and Asalanka taking the number four and fifth spots respectively. While Mendis had a fantastic 2024, scoring 742 runs from 17 matches, the left-handed Asalanka averaged over 50 (50.2) playing in the middle overs, besides scoring 605 runs in 16 outings. However, the breakthrough inclusion is of West Indies batter Sherfane Rutherford, who had a stellar 2024. The left-handed batter scored 425 runs, averaging a whopping 106 and striking at 120.1. Azmatullah Omarzai comes in at number seven for having scored 417 runs and picking 17 wickets across 12 ODIs in the past year. The bowlers Of the four bowlers, two are from Pakistan and one each from Afghanistan and Sri Lanka. Also read | Boost for Australia as Test specialist cleared of injury for Sri Lanka Tests The two pacers picked are Shaheen Afridi and Haris Rauf, who picked 15 and 13 wickets, respectively. While Shaheen bagged those at a bowling average of 17.6, Rauf’s read 22.4. The two remaining bowlers are the spinners, Wanindu Hasaranga from Sri Lanka and Allah Ghazanfar from Afghanistan. Hasaranga was perhaps the best bowler of the year, picking 26 wickets from 10 matches, averaging just 15.6, while teenager Ghazanfar had a better bowling average of 13.57, bagging 21 wickets from 11 games. Presenting the ICC Men’s ODI Team of the Year 2024 featuring the finest players from around the world 👏 pic.twitter.com/ic4BSXlXCc — ICC (@ICC) January 24, 2025 Here is ICC’s ODI Team of the Year 2024 – Saim Ayub, Rahmanullah Gurbaz, Pathum Nissanka, Kusal Mendis, Charith Asalanka (captain), Sherfane Rutherford, Azmatullah Omarzai, Wanindu Hasaranga, Shaheen Afridi, Haris Rauf and Allah Ghazanfar (With inputs from agencies)

No Indian in ICC’s ODI Team of the Year 2024; 3 Afghanistan players included

The International Criminal Court&rsquo;s (ICC) chief prosecutor Karim Khan said on Thursday (Jan 23) that he is seeking arrest warrants against the top faces of the Taliban for their rulings against Afghan women, saying it's a crime against humanity.&nbsp;
Khan said that there is strong evidence that the Taliban&rsquo;s supreme leader, Haibatullah Akhundzada, and the chief justice, Abdul Hakim Haqqani, &ldquo;bear criminal responsibility for the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds&rdquo;.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/yemens-leather-craftswomen-play-crucial-role-in-preserving-the-countrys-cultural-heritage">Yemen's leather craftswomen play crucial role in preserving the country&rsquo;s cultural heritage</a>
He further added that the women and people from the LGBTQ community in Afghanistan were undergoing &ldquo;an unprecedented, unconscionable, and ongoing persecution by the Taliban," The Guardian reported.&nbsp;
The prosecutor said, &ldquo;Our action signals that the status quo for women and girls in Afghanistan is not acceptable.&rdquo;
Khan's application will now be considered by the ICC judges, and they will decide if arrest warrants will be issued or not. The entire process can take weeks and even months.&nbsp;
Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/economist-yunus-leads-bangladesh-to-economic-collapse">Economist Yunus leads Bangladesh to economic collapse</a>&nbsp;
The ICC chief said that he would further submit more applications for other Taliban officials and added that other kinds of human crimes are also being committed in Afghanistan.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Perceived resistance or opposition to the Taliban was, and is, brutally repressed through the commission of crimes including murder, imprisonment, torture, rape and other forms of sexual violence, enforced disappearance, and other inhumane acts," Khan said in his application.&nbsp;
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/saudi-prince-mohammed-bin-salman-vows-600-billion-trade-to-us-president-donald-trump-8648330">Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman vows $600 billion trade to US Prez Donald Trump</a>
Human Rights Watch said that Khan's actions can put the Taliban's crime against women back on the agenda of the international community.
Since it came back to power in August 2021 in Afghanistan, the Taliban posed tough restrictions on Afghan women that the United Nations has called &ldquo;gender apartheid&rdquo;.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/as-fresh-wildfire-breaks-out-in-california-rare-storm-grips-texas-florida-louisiana">As Fresh Wildfire Breaks Out in California, Rare Storm Grips Texas, Florida, Louisiana</a>
The extremist group has banned women from schools, colleges, and various professions, along with other restrictions. Recently, the Taliban banned window construction in houses, especially in the kitchens, to prevent women from being seen.&nbsp;
(With inputs from agencies)

World | Afghanistan: The ICC judges are set to review Khan's application, a critical step that could lead to the issuance of arrest warrants based on the presented evidence and legal arguments.

The International Criminal Court’s (ICC) chief prosecutor Karim Khan said on Thursday (Jan 23) that he is seeking arrest warrants against the top faces of the Taliban for their rulings against Afghan women, saying it's a crime against humanity. Khan said that there is strong evidence that the Taliban’s supreme leader, Haibatullah Akhundzada, and the chief justice, Abdul Hakim Haqqani, “bear criminal responsibility for the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds”. Also read: Yemen's leather craftswomen play crucial role in preserving the country’s cultural heritage He further added that the women and people from the LGBTQ community in Afghanistan were undergoing “an unprecedented, unconscionable, and ongoing persecution by the Taliban," The Guardian reported. The prosecutor said, “Our action signals that the status quo for women and girls in Afghanistan is not acceptable.” Khan's application will now be considered by the ICC judges, and they will decide if arrest warrants will be issued or not. The entire process can take weeks and even months. Also read: Economist Yunus leads Bangladesh to economic collapse The ICC chief said that he would further submit more applications for other Taliban officials and added that other kinds of human crimes are also being committed in Afghanistan. “Perceived resistance or opposition to the Taliban was, and is, brutally repressed through the commission of crimes including murder, imprisonment, torture, rape and other forms of sexual violence, enforced disappearance, and other inhumane acts," Khan said in his application. Also read: Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman vows $600 billion trade to US Prez Donald Trump Human Rights Watch said that Khan's actions can put the Taliban's crime against women back on the agenda of the international community. Since it came back to power in August 2021 in Afghanistan, the Taliban posed tough restrictions on Afghan women that the United Nations has called “gender apartheid”. Also read: As Fresh Wildfire Breaks Out in California, Rare Storm Grips Texas, Florida, Louisiana The extremist group has banned women from schools, colleges, and various professions, along with other restrictions. Recently, the Taliban banned window construction in houses, especially in the kitchens, to prevent women from being seen. (With inputs from agencies)

ICC seeking arrest warrants against Taliban top leaders over crime against women

Ahead of the grand opening ceremony and the captains&rsquo; event for the upcoming <a href="https://www.wionews.com/tags/champions-trophy">Champions Trophy</a> 2025, there is still no clarity to whether India captain <a href="https://www.wionews.com/tags/rohit-sharma">Rohit Sharma</a> will travel to Pakistan. &nbsp;
The captains&rsquo; event is tentatively scheduled around February 16 or 17 in Karachi, but the Board of Control for Cricket in India (<a href="https://www.wionews.com/search?title=BCCI">BCCI</a>) is yet to get any official communication on it from the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/tags/international-cricket-council">ICC</a>.&nbsp;
&ldquo;It [Rohit travelling to Pakistan] has not yet been discussed. It is not on the agenda yet,&rdquo; ESPNcricinfo quogetd Devjit Saikia, the BCCI's newly appointed secretary, as saying.&nbsp;
It is understood that the PCB has requested the ICC to ensure that, as per standard practice, all teams and captains are available for the Champions Trophy photoshoot, opening ceremony and other pre-tournament engagements.&nbsp;
The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is planning a grand event, tentatively scheduled for February 16 or 17, subject to warm-up match fixtures.&nbsp;
Earlier reports had said that Rohit Sharma will be travelling to Pakistan to attend the opening ceremony of the Champions Trophy. &nbsp;
The eight-team event will feature Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, England, India, New Zealand and South Africa, alongside hosts Pakistan.&nbsp;
<h2>India to play at a neutral venue</h2>
India won't travel to Pakistan to play in the Champions Trophy despite the latter being announced as the hosts by the International Cricket Council. The Board of Control for Cricket in India confirmed that they have not received the required permission from the Indian government to send their team to Pakistan.&nbsp;
Due to India's reluctance, the tournament is set to be played in a hybrid format, with Pakistan hosting most of the matches, but all of India's group games and the first semi-final will be played in Dubai.&nbsp;
The tournament will begin on February 19 when the hosts Pakistan will take in New Zealand in Karachi. The highly anticipated India-Pakistan match will be held on February 23 in Dubai.&nbsp;
The final of the Champions Trophy will be played on March 9.&nbsp;

Sports, Cricket: The captains’ event is tentatively scheduled around February 16 or 17 in Karachi, but the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is yet to get any official communication on it from the ICC

Ahead of the grand opening ceremony and the captains’ event for the upcoming Champions Trophy 2025, there is still no clarity to whether India captain Rohit Sharma will travel to Pakistan. The captains’ event is tentatively scheduled around February 16 or 17 in Karachi, but the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is yet to get any official communication on it from the ICC. “It [Rohit travelling to Pakistan] has not yet been discussed. It is not on the agenda yet,” ESPNcricinfo quogetd Devjit Saikia, the BCCI's newly appointed secretary, as saying. It is understood that the PCB has requested the ICC to ensure that, as per standard practice, all teams and captains are available for the Champions Trophy photoshoot, opening ceremony and other pre-tournament engagements. The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is planning a grand event, tentatively scheduled for February 16 or 17, subject to warm-up match fixtures. Earlier reports had said that Rohit Sharma will be travelling to Pakistan to attend the opening ceremony of the Champions Trophy. The eight-team event will feature Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, England, India, New Zealand and South Africa, alongside hosts Pakistan. India to play at a neutral venue India won't travel to Pakistan to play in the Champions Trophy despite the latter being announced as the hosts by the International Cricket Council. The Board of Control for Cricket in India confirmed that they have not received the required permission from the Indian government to send their team to Pakistan. Due to India's reluctance, the tournament is set to be played in a hybrid format, with Pakistan hosting most of the matches, but all of India's group games and the first semi-final will be played in Dubai. The tournament will begin on February 19 when the hosts Pakistan will take in New Zealand in Karachi. The highly anticipated India-Pakistan match will be held on February 23 in Dubai. The final of the Champions Trophy will be played on March 9.

Champions Trophy 2025: Uncertainty looms over Rohit Sharma’s plan to travel to Pakistan to attend opening ceremony

A day after the conclusion of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2024-25 &ndash; the fourth best-attended Test series Down Under and reportedly the most-watched one of all time - reports said that cricket&rsquo;s Big 3 &ndash; India, Australia and England are in talks with the new ICC chair Jay Shah on formulating a two-tier Test cricket structure.
Shah would meet Cricket Australia (CA) chair Mike Baird and Richard Thompson of the England Cricket Board later this month. Discussion on splitting Tests into two is on the agenda, as per the reports.
The purpose, however, is to ensure India, Australia and England can play each other often &ndash; a push coming from the record crowds and broadcast audiences for the BGT.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-spicy-scg-wicket-impresses-india-coach-gautam-gambhir-says-its-good-for-test-cricket-8594563" rel="dofollow">BGT - 'Spicy' SCG wicket impresses Gambhir, says &lsquo;it&rsquo;s good for Tests&rsquo;</a>
Although nothing is on record, if things go according to plan, a two-division Test cricket structure will get underway after the Future Tours Program (FTP) in 2027, which will also host the 150th Anniversary Test between England and Australia in March of that year.
Several influential cricket personalities like Ravi Shastri have indicated the same earlier, saying that with the rapid growth of franchise-based T20 Leagues worldwide, the &lsquo;best versus the best&rsquo; in Tests can help the oldest format sustain in a packed cricket calendar.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;ve been a firm believer in that if you want Test cricket to survive and be alive and thriving, I think that&rsquo;s the way to go,&rdquo; Shastri said in a chat with SEN during the SCG Test. &ldquo;The top teams play against each other more often, so there is a contest; you want contests.&rdquo;
<h2>More &lsquo;best vs best&rsquo; matches</h2>
Given a significant disparity between the quality, revenue and engagement of top-tier teams and those languishing at the bottom of the current World Test Championship (WTC) table and on Test rankings, the two-division Test structure could be a way forward.
Should India, Australia and England be let go of facing others more often, they would be taking on each other at least twice in three years rather than twice in four years under the current cycle.
The idea of a two-division Test structure was floated around 2016, where the top seven teams will make up the top tier, while five in the second.
The then BCCI head Anurag Thakur snubbed this idea, saying this would cut smaller nations&rsquo; right to enter the exclusive Test cricket club.
&ldquo;The BCCI is against the two-tier Test system because the smaller countries will lose out, and the BCCI wants to take care of them. It is necessary to protect their interests.
&ldquo;In the two-tier system, they will lose out on a lot, including revenue and the opportunity to play against top teams. We don&rsquo;t want that to happen. We want to work in the best interests of world cricket, and that is why our team plays against all the countries,&rdquo; Thakur said in 2016.
Back then, the BCCI, Sri Lanka Cricket, the BCB and Zimbabwe Cricket opposed the proposal, while Australia, England, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan and West Indies supported it.
Eventually, it couldn&rsquo;t come into reality.
(With inputs from agencies)

Sports, cricket: Big 3 of international cricket - India, Australia and England would play more often should the Test structure be divided into two divisions. 

A day after the conclusion of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2024-25 – the fourth best-attended Test series Down Under and reportedly the most-watched one of all time - reports said that cricket’s Big 3 – India, Australia and England are in talks with the new ICC chair Jay Shah on formulating a two-tier Test cricket structure. Shah would meet Cricket Australia (CA) chair Mike Baird and Richard Thompson of the England Cricket Board later this month. Discussion on splitting Tests into two is on the agenda, as per the reports. The purpose, however, is to ensure India, Australia and England can play each other often – a push coming from the record crowds and broadcast audiences for the BGT. Also read | BGT - 'Spicy' SCG wicket impresses Gambhir, says ‘it’s good for Tests’ Although nothing is on record, if things go according to plan, a two-division Test cricket structure will get underway after the Future Tours Program (FTP) in 2027, which will also host the 150th Anniversary Test between England and Australia in March of that year. Several influential cricket personalities like Ravi Shastri have indicated the same earlier, saying that with the rapid growth of franchise-based T20 Leagues worldwide, the ‘best versus the best’ in Tests can help the oldest format sustain in a packed cricket calendar. “I’ve been a firm believer in that if you want Test cricket to survive and be alive and thriving, I think that’s the way to go,” Shastri said in a chat with SEN during the SCG Test. “The top teams play against each other more often, so there is a contest; you want contests.” More ‘best vs best’ matches Given a significant disparity between the quality, revenue and engagement of top-tier teams and those languishing at the bottom of the current World Test Championship (WTC) table and on Test rankings, the two-division Test structure could be a way forward. Should India, Australia and England be let go of facing others more often, they would be taking on each other at least twice in three years rather than twice in four years under the current cycle. The idea of a two-division Test structure was floated around 2016, where the top seven teams will make up the top tier, while five in the second. The then BCCI head Anurag Thakur snubbed this idea, saying this would cut smaller nations’ right to enter the exclusive Test cricket club. “The BCCI is against the two-tier Test system because the smaller countries will lose out, and the BCCI wants to take care of them. It is necessary to protect their interests. “In the two-tier system, they will lose out on a lot, including revenue and the opportunity to play against top teams. We don’t want that to happen. We want to work in the best interests of world cricket, and that is why our team plays against all the countries,” Thakur said in 2016. Back then, the BCCI, Sri Lanka Cricket, the BCB and Zimbabwe Cricket opposed the proposal, while Australia, England, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan and West Indies supported it. Eventually, it couldn’t come into reality. (With inputs from agencies)

Cricket's Big 3 in talks with ICC chair over potential Test structure split - Report

Melbourne: The ICC fined Virat Kohli 20 per cent of his match fees for deliberately shouldering Australian teenager Sam Konstas on day one of the Boxing Day Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, but former Aussie skipper Ricky Ponting feels it was not harsh enough. Calling out the instance from the commentary box, Ponting expressed disappointment ahead of day two with how Kohli got away with a minute punishment, claiming 'it's different for some people'.
"Personally, I do not think it [the punishment] was harsh enough. I know there are precedents [where similar infringements have incurred similar-sized penalties] - they have generally been between a 15 and 25 per cent fine, but let us have a think about the enormity of yesterday,&rdquo; Ponting said while speaking on 7 Cricket ahead of day two.
After Australia elected to bat first at the MCG, Konstas, who had replaced McSweeney and was making his Test debut, smoked Indian ace seamer Jasprit Bumrah for 18 runs in his fourth over, including hitting him a six off a reverse scoop.
His stroke play impressed everyone except Virat, who bumped into Konstas after the end of the 10th over, leading to a confrontation.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m569tq1f-v5emyo6q-9f5kt5d6">
Virat Kohli and Sam Konstas exchanged a heated moment on the MCG. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvIND?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvIND</a> <a href="https://t.co/QL13nZ9IGI">pic.twitter.com/QL13nZ9IGI</a>
&mdash; cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) <a href="https://twitter.com/cricketcomau/status/1872076770788212737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 26, 2024</a></blockquote>
Usman Khawaja and the on-field umpires had to intervene to separate them, with the crowd and social media buzzing over the incident.&nbsp;
Cricket Australia reported first that the ICC would look into the matter following the day&rsquo;s play, and they did, finding Kohli guilty of breaching their code of conduct and punishing him for the same.
ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-mcg-test-australia-all-out-on-474-in-first-innings-after-steve-smiths-record-34th-test-ton-8569119" rel="dofollow">BGT, MCG Test: Australia all out on 474 after Smith&rsquo;s record Test ton</a>
Kohli accepted the fine.
However, Ponting talked about its larger implications.
&ldquo;It is probably the most-watched day of cricket all year all around the world. Imagine if that happens in a grade game on the weekend now, what is going to happen there? I think people are going to think that that is almost acceptable now,&rdquo; Ponting noted.
<h2>'Punishments are different for different people'</h2>
The former Aussie captain, who during his time was also a fierce competitor, didn&rsquo;t mince his words in implying that Kohli perhaps escaped a ban, adding there are different punishments for different people.
"And, unfortunately, for someone like Virat, as we got told as players and as senior players, sometimes it is [the scale of punishment] just different for some people. He is a role model; he is somebody the cricketing world looks up to, so I, personally, do not think that the fine was harsh enough,&rdquo; he noted.
Meanwhile, Australia scored 474 in the first innings, thanks to a brilliant 140 from Steve Smith &ndash; his record 34th Test ton, second of this series, fifth at the MCG and 18th overall in Australia.&nbsp;
In reply, India lost their captain Rohit Sharma (3) and KL Rahul (24) before tea on day two.&nbsp;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m569vxg4-g5hljeip-64kq9nv1">
ABSOLUTE SEED FROM CUMMINS! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvIND?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvIND</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DeliveredWithSpeed?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DeliveredWithSpeed</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/NBN_Australia?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nbn_australia</a> <a href="https://t.co/zvzvkDyAnb">pic.twitter.com/zvzvkDyAnb</a>
&mdash; cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) <a href="https://twitter.com/cricketcomau/status/1872497414206009414?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
(With inputs from agencies)

Calling out the instance from the commentary box earlier, Ponting expressed disappointment with how Kohli got away with a small fine

Melbourne: The ICC fined Virat Kohli 20 per cent of his match fees for deliberately shouldering Australian teenager Sam Konstas on day one of the Boxing Day Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, but former Aussie skipper Ricky Ponting feels it was not harsh enough. Calling out the instance from the commentary box, Ponting expressed disappointment ahead of day two with how Kohli got away with a minute punishment, claiming 'it's different for some people'. "Personally, I do not think it [the punishment] was harsh enough. I know there are precedents [where similar infringements have incurred similar-sized penalties] - they have generally been between a 15 and 25 per cent fine, but let us have a think about the enormity of yesterday,” Ponting said while speaking on 7 Cricket ahead of day two. After Australia elected to bat first at the MCG, Konstas, who had replaced McSweeney and was making his Test debut, smoked Indian ace seamer Jasprit Bumrah for 18 runs in his fourth over, including hitting him a six off a reverse scoop. His stroke play impressed everyone except Virat, who bumped into Konstas after the end of the 10th over, leading to a confrontation. Virat Kohli and Sam Konstas exchanged a heated moment on the MCG. #AUSvIND pic.twitter.com/QL13nZ9IGI — cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) December 26, 2024 Usman Khawaja and the on-field umpires had to intervene to separate them, with the crowd and social media buzzing over the incident. Cricket Australia reported first that the ICC would look into the matter following the day’s play, and they did, finding Kohli guilty of breaching their code of conduct and punishing him for the same. ALSO READ: BGT, MCG Test: Australia all out on 474 after Smith’s record Test ton Kohli accepted the fine. However, Ponting talked about its larger implications. “It is probably the most-watched day of cricket all year all around the world. Imagine if that happens in a grade game on the weekend now, what is going to happen there? I think people are going to think that that is almost acceptable now,” Ponting noted. 'Punishments are different for different people' The former Aussie captain, who during his time was also a fierce competitor, didn’t mince his words in implying that Kohli perhaps escaped a ban, adding there are different punishments for different people. "And, unfortunately, for someone like Virat, as we got told as players and as senior players, sometimes it is [the scale of punishment] just different for some people. He is a role model; he is somebody the cricketing world looks up to, so I, personally, do not think that the fine was harsh enough,” he noted. Meanwhile, Australia scored 474 in the first innings, thanks to a brilliant 140 from Steve Smith – his record 34th Test ton, second of this series, fifth at the MCG and 18th overall in Australia. In reply, India lost their captain Rohit Sharma (3) and KL Rahul (24) before tea on day two. ABSOLUTE SEED FROM CUMMINS! #AUSvIND | #DeliveredWithSpeed | @nbn_australia pic.twitter.com/zvzvkDyAnb — cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) December 27, 2024 (With inputs from agencies)

BGT: Ponting reckons Kohli's fine for shouldering Konstas wasn't 'harsh enough'

Virat Kohli has been fined 20 per cent of his match fee, handed 1 demerit point for altercation with Sam Konstas on Day 1 of the Boxing Day Test between India and Australia, at the MCG, Melbourne on Thursday (Dec 26). The incident took place during the opening session after India asked Australia to bat first, and debutant Konstas came out all guns blazing. He attacked from the word go, including taking on Jasprit Bumrah, and Kohli came towards him -- in between overs -- and shouldered the newcomer, receiving flak from the International Cricket Council (ICC) after end of the day's play.
<section class="cb-nws-dtl-itms" itemprop="articleBody">
Article 2.02 of ICC's Code of Conduct states, "Any form of inappropriate physical contact is prohibited in cricket. Without limitation, players will breach this regulation if they deliberately, recklessly and/or negligently walk or run into or shoulder another player or umpire.
</section>
<div class="cb-nws-dtl-itms">
<div id="native_mid_article" class="cb-ad-unit cb-nws-para ng-isolate-scope" ad-loaded="true"></div>
</div>
<section class="cb-nws-dtl-itms" itemprop="articleBody">
When assessing the seriousness of the breach, the following factors (without limitation) shall be taken into account: (i) the context of the particular situation, including, without limitation, whether the contact was deliberate (i.e. intentional), reckless, negligent, and/or avoidable; (ii) the force of the contact; (iii) any resulting injury to the person with whom contact was made; and (iv) the person with whom contact was made."
Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/border-gavaskar-trophy-2024-25-australia-end-day-1-of-boxing-day-test-at-311-6-debutant-sam-konstas-impresses-with-fiery-60-8566856" rel="dofollow">BGT: Australia end Day 1 of Boxing Day Test at 311-6, debutant Sam Konstas impresses with fiery 60</a>
<section class="cb-nws-dtl-itms" itemprop="articleBody">
Former Australia captain Ricky Ponting also lashed out at Kohli for his action versus Konstas. "Virat walked one whole pitch over to his right and instigated that confrontation. No doubt in my mind whatsoever. I have no doubt that the umpires and the referee will have a good look at that. Fielders should be nowhere near the batsman at that stage. Every fieldsman on the ground knows where the batsmen will congregate and get together. It looked to me that Konstas looked up really late, and wouldn't even know anyone was in front of him. That man on-screen there (Kohli) might have a few questions to answer," Ponting was quoted in Channel Seven as saying by Fox.
</section>
<section class="cb-nws-dtl-itms" itemprop="articleBody">
Even Ravi Shastri, former India coach, slammed Kohli's act and termed it 'unnecessary' post the day's play. "There is a line and you don't want to overstep that line," Shastri stated on air.
Talking about Day 1 of the MCG Test, Australia ended at 311-6 courtesy of fifties from the top four batters. The 2024/25 Border-Gavaskar Trophy (BGT) is currently tied at 1-1 after three Tests.
</section>
</section>

BGT: Virat Kohli has been fined 20 per cent of his match fee and handed a demerit point for altercation with Sam Konstas on Day 1 of the Boxing Day Test at the MCG, Melbourne.

Virat Kohli has been fined 20 per cent of his match fee, handed 1 demerit point for altercation with Sam Konstas on Day 1 of the Boxing Day Test between India and Australia, at the MCG, Melbourne on Thursday (Dec 26). The incident took place during the opening session after India asked Australia to bat first, and debutant Konstas came out all guns blazing. He attacked from the word go, including taking on Jasprit Bumrah, and Kohli came towards him -- in between overs -- and shouldered the newcomer, receiving flak from the International Cricket Council (ICC) after end of the day's play. Article 2.02 of ICC's Code of Conduct states, "Any form of inappropriate physical contact is prohibited in cricket. Without limitation, players will breach this regulation if they deliberately, recklessly and/or negligently walk or run into or shoulder another player or umpire. When assessing the seriousness of the breach, the following factors (without limitation) shall be taken into account: (i) the context of the particular situation, including, without limitation, whether the contact was deliberate (i.e. intentional), reckless, negligent, and/or avoidable; (ii) the force of the contact; (iii) any resulting injury to the person with whom contact was made; and (iv) the person with whom contact was made." Also read: BGT: Australia end Day 1 of Boxing Day Test at 311-6, debutant Sam Konstas impresses with fiery 60 Former Australia captain Ricky Ponting also lashed out at Kohli for his action versus Konstas. "Virat walked one whole pitch over to his right and instigated that confrontation. No doubt in my mind whatsoever. I have no doubt that the umpires and the referee will have a good look at that. Fielders should be nowhere near the batsman at that stage. Every fieldsman on the ground knows where the batsmen will congregate and get together. It looked to me that Konstas looked up really late, and wouldn't even know anyone was in front of him. That man on-screen there (Kohli) might have a few questions to answer," Ponting was quoted in Channel Seven as saying by Fox. Even Ravi Shastri, former India coach, slammed Kohli's act and termed it 'unnecessary' post the day's play. "There is a line and you don't want to overstep that line," Shastri stated on air. Talking about Day 1 of the MCG Test, Australia ended at 311-6 courtesy of fifties from the top four batters. The 2024/25 Border-Gavaskar Trophy (BGT) is currently tied at 1-1 after three Tests.

BGT: Virat Kohli fined 20 per cent of match fee, handed 1 demerit point for Sam Konstas altercation

Dubai, UAE
The International Cricket Council (ICC) has announced the official schedule of the upcoming Champions Trophy 2025 which begins on February 19. The eight-team tournament will be played under hybrid model with India's matches scheduled to be played in Dubai, UAE. India will also play its semi-final and the final in Dubai if thy make it that far. The apex body also has given a reserve day for each of the semi-final and the final as well.
The groups for Champions Trophy 2025 are as follows:
Group A: Pakistan, India, New Zealand, Bangladesh
Group B: South Africa, Australia, Afghanistan, England
Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-2024-25-ricky-ponting-shares-advice-for-shubman-gill-to-score-runs-in-australia-786487">Ricky Ponting shares advice for Shubman Gill to score runs in Australia</a>
<h2>Check the full schedule below:</h2>
19 February, Pakistan v New Zealand, Karachi, Pakistan
20 February, Bangladesh v India, Dubai (UAE)
21 February, Afghanistan v South Africa, Karachi, Pakistan
22 February, Australia v England, Lahore, Pakistan
23 February, Pakistan v India, Dubai (UAE)
24 February, Bangladesh v New Zealand, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
25 February, Australia v South Africa, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
26 February, Afghanistan v England, Lahore, Pakistan
27 February, Pakistan v Bangladesh, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
28 February, Afghanistan v Australia, Lahore, Pakistan
1 March, South Africa v England, Karachi, Pakistan
2 March, New Zealand v India, Dubai (UAE)
4 March, Semi-final 1, Dubai (UAE)
5 March, Semi-final 2, Lahore, Pakistan
9 March, Final, Lahore (unless India qualify, when it will be played in Dubai)
India and Pakistan were in deadlock after the Board on Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) refused to send the Indian team to Pakistan due to security concerns. The impasse lasted weeks as Pakistan was firm in its demand to host the entire tournament and rejected the hybrid model.
The tussle was settled after both boards agreed to not travel to each other's country for the ICC tournaments till 2027. The drama ended with the UAE being selected as the neutral venue for India to play its matches, including the semi-final and the final if they make it that far.

The eight-team tournament will be played under hybrid model with India's matches scheduled to be played in Dubai, UAE.



Dubai, UAE The International Cricket Council (ICC) has announced the official schedule of the upcoming Champions Trophy 2025 which begins on February 19. The eight-team tournament will be played under hybrid model with India's matches scheduled to be played in Dubai, UAE. India will also play its semi-final and the final in Dubai if thy make it that far. The apex body also has given a reserve day for each of the semi-final and the final as well. The groups for Champions Trophy 2025 are as follows: Group A: Pakistan, India, New Zealand, Bangladesh Group B: South Africa, Australia, Afghanistan, England Also Read: Ricky Ponting shares advice for Shubman Gill to score runs in Australia Check the full schedule below: 19 February, Pakistan v New Zealand, Karachi, Pakistan 20 February, Bangladesh v India, Dubai (UAE) 21 February, Afghanistan v South Africa, Karachi, Pakistan 22 February, Australia v England, Lahore, Pakistan 23 February, Pakistan v India, Dubai (UAE) 24 February, Bangladesh v New Zealand, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 25 February, Australia v South Africa, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 26 February, Afghanistan v England, Lahore, Pakistan 27 February, Pakistan v Bangladesh, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 28 February, Afghanistan v Australia, Lahore, Pakistan 1 March, South Africa v England, Karachi, Pakistan 2 March, New Zealand v India, Dubai (UAE) 4 March, Semi-final 1, Dubai (UAE) 5 March, Semi-final 2, Lahore, Pakistan 9 March, Final, Lahore (unless India qualify, when it will be played in Dubai) India and Pakistan were in deadlock after the Board on Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) refused to send the Indian team to Pakistan due to security concerns. The impasse lasted weeks as Pakistan was firm in its demand to host the entire tournament and rejected the hybrid model. The tussle was settled after both boards agreed to not travel to each other's country for the ICC tournaments till 2027. The drama ended with the UAE being selected as the neutral venue for India to play its matches, including the semi-final and the final if they make it that far.

Champions Trophy 2025: ICC releases full schedule of tournament - check details inside

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has announced the official schedule of the upcoming Champions Trophy 2025 which begins on February 19. The eight-team tournament will be played under hybrid model with India's matches scheduled to be played in Dubai, UAE. India&nbsp;will also play its semi-final and the final in Dubai if thy make it that far. The apex body also has given a reserve day for each of the semi-final and the final as well.

The groups for Champions Trophy 2025 are as follows:

Group A:&nbsp;Pakistan, India, New Zealand, Bangladesh

Group B:&nbsp;South Africa, Australia, Afghanistan, England

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-2024-25-ricky-ponting-shares-advice-for-shubman-gill-to-score-runs-in-australia-786487">Ricky Ponting shares advice for Shubman Gill to score runs in Australia</a>

<h2>Check the full schedule below:</h2>

19 February, Pakistan v New Zealand, Karachi, Pakistan

20 February, Bangladesh v India, Dubai (UAE)

21 February, Afghanistan v South Africa, Karachi, Pakistan

22 February, Australia v England, Lahore, Pakistan

23 February, Pakistan v India, Dubai&nbsp;(UAE)

24 February, Bangladesh v New Zealand, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

25 February, Australia v South Africa, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

26 February, Afghanistan v England, Lahore, Pakistan

27 February, Pakistan v Bangladesh, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

28 February, Afghanistan v Australia, Lahore, Pakistan

1 March, South Africa v England, Karachi, Pakistan

2 March, New Zealand v India, Dubai&nbsp;(UAE)

4 March, Semi-final 1, Dubai&nbsp;(UAE)

5 March, Semi-final 2, Lahore, Pakistan

9 March, Final, Lahore (unless India qualify, when it will be played in Dubai)

India and Pakistan were in deadlock after the Board on Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) refused to send the Indian team to Pakistan due to security concerns. The impasse lasted weeks as Pakistan was firm in its&nbsp;demand to host the entire tournament and rejected the hybrid model.

The tussle was settled after both boards agreed to not travel to each other's country for the ICC tournaments till 2027. The drama ended with the UAE being selected as the neutral venue for India to play its matches, including the semi-final and the final if they make it that far.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has announced the official schedule of the upcoming Champions Trophy 2025 which begins on February 19. The eight-team tournament will be played under hybrid model with India's matches scheduled to be played in Dubai, UAE.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has announced the official schedule of the upcoming Champions Trophy 2025 which begins on February 19. The eight-team tournament will be played under hybrid model with India's matches scheduled to be played in Dubai, UAE. India will also play its semi-final and the final in Dubai if thy make it that far. The apex body also has given a reserve day for each of the semi-final and the final as well. The groups for Champions Trophy 2025 are as follows: Group A: Pakistan, India, New Zealand, Bangladesh Group B: South Africa, Australia, Afghanistan, England Also Read: Ricky Ponting shares advice for Shubman Gill to score runs in Australia Check the full schedule below: 19 February, Pakistan v New Zealand, Karachi, Pakistan 20 February, Bangladesh v India, Dubai (UAE) 21 February, Afghanistan v South Africa, Karachi, Pakistan 22 February, Australia v England, Lahore, Pakistan 23 February, Pakistan v India, Dubai (UAE) 24 February, Bangladesh v New Zealand, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 25 February, Australia v South Africa, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 26 February, Afghanistan v England, Lahore, Pakistan 27 February, Pakistan v Bangladesh, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 28 February, Afghanistan v Australia, Lahore, Pakistan 1 March, South Africa v England, Karachi, Pakistan 2 March, New Zealand v India, Dubai (UAE) 4 March, Semi-final 1, Dubai (UAE) 5 March, Semi-final 2, Lahore, Pakistan 9 March, Final, Lahore (unless India qualify, when it will be played in Dubai) India and Pakistan were in deadlock after the Board on Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) refused to send the Indian team to Pakistan due to security concerns. The impasse lasted weeks as Pakistan was firm in its demand to host the entire tournament and rejected the hybrid model. The tussle was settled after both boards agreed to not travel to each other's country for the ICC tournaments till 2027. The drama ended with the UAE being selected as the neutral venue for India to play its matches, including the semi-final and the final if they make it that far.

New Delhi, India
A final decision on the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy was made on Monday after weeks of deliberation. Pakistan will host the tournament in February and March next year, but India's matches will be played at a neutral venue. An agreement has been made not just for the 2025 Champions Trophy, but for the entire 2024-27 ICC cycle. India-Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the period will be played at a neutral venue. The decision marks a major development in cricketing ties between both countries, which have been affected due to the strained political relations over the last two decades.
<h2>What led to the breakdown?</h2>
India and Pakistan's cricketing ties have always been complex. There was no cricket played between the two countries between 1962 and 1977 due to two major wars in 1965 and 1971. Subsequently, there was regular cricket between the two nations till 1999, when there was another suspension due to the Kargil war.
However, a peace process was initiated by Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in 2004 which led to India touring Pakistan for the first time in 14 years. That launched arguably the most successful period of cricket diplomacy between India and Pakistan. Pakistan also toured India in 2007, but things took a turn for the worse the very next year.
The Indian cricket team has not travelled to Pakistan since the 2008 Asia Cup, which took place a few months before the 26/11 Mumbai attack. Pakistani terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba killed at least 166 people after which both cricketing and political ties have been tense.
The 2009 terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore further put a question mark on Pakistan's ability to provide security to traveling teams. The incident led to a decade-long suspension of Test matches in the country and cost Pakistan its co-hosting rights for the 2011 Cricket World Cup- which was hosted and won by India.
There was a brief attempt at revival with a bilateral series held in India in 2012/13, but subsequent attempts have been blocked. For any series to take place between India and Pakistan, the BCCI now requires clearance from the Indian Government. Test cricket has returned to Pakistan in 2019 with the series against Sri Lanka. Heavyweights Australia, England and New Zealand have all toured Pakistan since, but a bilateral series with India remains off the table.
<h2>Which cricket board has been more affected by the hiatus?</h2>
The fortunes of the two cricket boards over the last 15 years have been contrasting, to say the least. The BCCI has grown from strength to strength and established itself as undoubtedly the most powerful and richest cricket board in the world.
The BCCI has not been hurt by the absence of regular matches against their old rivals. The biggest success story for the Indian cricket board in the last decade has been the inception of the IPL, which is the second most valuable franchise league in the world. The IPL is the biggest money-spinner for the BCCI and it has exponentially grown the financial might of Indian cricket.
A recent ICC report revealed that India’s economy got a massive boost of $1.39 billion for organising last year’s ODI World Cup. India received a lion’s share from the ICC income to the tune of 38.5 percent, in contrast, Pakistan’s share is just 5.75 per cent. According to a BCCI document, the board's cash and bank balance for FY2024 is ₹20,686 crore (approx. $2.4 billion). Cricket Australia is next on the list with a revenue of ₹658 crore. The Pakistan Cricket Board's net worth as of September 2024 is ₹458 crore (approx. $55 million), which is approximately 1/50th of the revenue of the BCCI.
<h2>How much money do Ind-Pak Matches generate?</h2>
The fact that India &amp; Pakistan only meet each other in ICC &amp; multi-team events, it makes the clashes all the more special. It remains the most-awaited match of any ICC tournament. Demographically, 1.639 billion probable viewership comes from only India &amp; Pakistan which is almost 40 per cent of the world’s total cricket viewers. India-Pakistan match is of significant importance for the broadcasters &amp; the sponsors.
According to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), the estimated revenue generated by India-Pakistan matches in the past 20 years is approximately ₹10,000 crore or $1.3 billion. Here are some staggering stats from some notable recent India-Pak matches:
<h3>2023 ODI World Cup</h3>
Venue: Ahmedabad
Viewership: 398 Million (digital + broadcast)
<h3>2022 T20 World Cup</h3>
Venue: Melbourne
Viewership: 256 million viewing hours in India
<h3>2019 ODI World Cup</h3>
Venue: Manchester
Viewership: 321 million (digital + broadcast)
ALSO READ | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/not-like-anyone-is-irreplaceable-ravindra-jadeja-terms-ravi-ashwins-retirement-as-golden-opportunity-785763">'Not like anyone is irreplaceable,' Ravindra Jadeja terms Ravi Ashwin's retirement as 'golden opportunity'</a>
<h2>What does the future hold?</h2>
The adoption of the hybrid model for the 2024-27 cycle will come as a major relief for all cricket fans. However, the fact that all India-Pakistan matches in the next few years will take place on neutral ground will take away some of the energy from the high-octane clashes. Some reports have suggested a triangular series could be possible involving India and Pakistan.
Such an arrangement would have to be approved by the ICC. However, the BCCI's reluctance, a packed cricket calendar and logistical challenges make it unlikely in the 2024-27 cycle. Purist cricket fans will be disappointed as the decision doesn't raise hope of a test match happening between the two nations. The last red ball India-Pakistan match was held in Bengaluru in 2007.
While India has not crossed the border in 16 years, Pakistan did so twice- for the 2016 T20 World Cup and the 2023 ODI World Cup. The latest decision marks a significant shift in the PCB's earlier stance and the board claims the move is an 'equitable arrangement' for the future. The decision certainly gives clarity for the next few years, but it won't put an end to the politicisation of cricket between the two countries.

An agreement has been made not just for the 2025 Champions Trophy, but for the entire 2024-27 ICC cycle. India-Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the period will be played at a neutral venue. The decision marks a major development in cricketing ties between both countries, which have been affected due to the strained political relations over the last two decades.



New Delhi, India A final decision on the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy was made on Monday after weeks of deliberation. Pakistan will host the tournament in February and March next year, but India's matches will be played at a neutral venue. An agreement has been made not just for the 2025 Champions Trophy, but for the entire 2024-27 ICC cycle. India-Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the period will be played at a neutral venue. The decision marks a major development in cricketing ties between both countries, which have been affected due to the strained political relations over the last two decades. What led to the breakdown? India and Pakistan's cricketing ties have always been complex. There was no cricket played between the two countries between 1962 and 1977 due to two major wars in 1965 and 1971. Subsequently, there was regular cricket between the two nations till 1999, when there was another suspension due to the Kargil war. However, a peace process was initiated by Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in 2004 which led to India touring Pakistan for the first time in 14 years. That launched arguably the most successful period of cricket diplomacy between India and Pakistan. Pakistan also toured India in 2007, but things took a turn for the worse the very next year. The Indian cricket team has not travelled to Pakistan since the 2008 Asia Cup, which took place a few months before the 26/11 Mumbai attack. Pakistani terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba killed at least 166 people after which both cricketing and political ties have been tense. The 2009 terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore further put a question mark on Pakistan's ability to provide security to traveling teams. The incident led to a decade-long suspension of Test matches in the country and cost Pakistan its co-hosting rights for the 2011 Cricket World Cup- which was hosted and won by India. There was a brief attempt at revival with a bilateral series held in India in 2012/13, but subsequent attempts have been blocked. For any series to take place between India and Pakistan, the BCCI now requires clearance from the Indian Government. Test cricket has returned to Pakistan in 2019 with the series against Sri Lanka. Heavyweights Australia, England and New Zealand have all toured Pakistan since, but a bilateral series with India remains off the table. Which cricket board has been more affected by the hiatus? The fortunes of the two cricket boards over the last 15 years have been contrasting, to say the least. The BCCI has grown from strength to strength and established itself as undoubtedly the most powerful and richest cricket board in the world. The BCCI has not been hurt by the absence of regular matches against their old rivals. The biggest success story for the Indian cricket board in the last decade has been the inception of the IPL, which is the second most valuable franchise league in the world. The IPL is the biggest money-spinner for the BCCI and it has exponentially grown the financial might of Indian cricket. A recent ICC report revealed that India’s economy got a massive boost of $1.39 billion for organising last year’s ODI World Cup. India received a lion’s share from the ICC income to the tune of 38.5 percent, in contrast, Pakistan’s share is just 5.75 per cent. According to a BCCI document, the board's cash and bank balance for FY2024 is ₹20,686 crore (approx. $2.4 billion). Cricket Australia is next on the list with a revenue of ₹658 crore. The Pakistan Cricket Board's net worth as of September 2024 is ₹458 crore (approx. $55 million), which is approximately 1/50th of the revenue of the BCCI. How much money do Ind-Pak Matches generate? The fact that India & Pakistan only meet each other in ICC & multi-team events, it makes the clashes all the more special. It remains the most-awaited match of any ICC tournament. Demographically, 1.639 billion probable viewership comes from only India & Pakistan which is almost 40 per cent of the world’s total cricket viewers. India-Pakistan match is of significant importance for the broadcasters & the sponsors. According to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), the estimated revenue generated by India-Pakistan matches in the past 20 years is approximately ₹10,000 crore or $1.3 billion. Here are some staggering stats from some notable recent India-Pak matches: 2023 ODI World Cup Venue: Ahmedabad Viewership: 398 Million (digital + broadcast) 2022 T20 World Cup Venue: Melbourne Viewership: 256 million viewing hours in India 2019 ODI World Cup Venue: Manchester Viewership: 321 million (digital + broadcast) ALSO READ | 'Not like anyone is irreplaceable,' Ravindra Jadeja terms Ravi Ashwin's retirement as 'golden opportunity' What does the future hold? The adoption of the hybrid model for the 2024-27 cycle will come as a major relief for all cricket fans. However, the fact that all India-Pakistan matches in the next few years will take place on neutral ground will take away some of the energy from the high-octane clashes. Some reports have suggested a triangular series could be possible involving India and Pakistan. Such an arrangement would have to be approved by the ICC. However, the BCCI's reluctance, a packed cricket calendar and logistical challenges make it unlikely in the 2024-27 cycle. Purist cricket fans will be disappointed as the decision doesn't raise hope of a test match happening between the two nations. The last red ball India-Pakistan match was held in Bengaluru in 2007. While India has not crossed the border in 16 years, Pakistan did so twice- for the 2016 T20 World Cup and the 2023 ODI World Cup. The latest decision marks a significant shift in the PCB's earlier stance and the board claims the move is an 'equitable arrangement' for the future. The decision certainly gives clarity for the next few years, but it won't put an end to the politicisation of cricket between the two countries.

Explained: The complex and strained cricketing ties between India and Pakistan

A final decision on the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy was made on Monday after weeks of deliberation. Pakistan will host the tournament in February and March next year, but India's matches will be played at a neutral venue. An agreement has been made not just for the 2025 Champions Trophy, but for the entire 2024-27 ICC cycle. India-Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the period will be played at a neutral venue. The decision marks a major development in cricketing ties between both countries, which have been affected due to the strained political relations over the last two decades.

<h2>What led to the breakdown?</h2>

India and Pakistan's cricketing ties have always been complex. There was no cricket played between the two countries between 1962 and 1977 due to two major wars in 1965 and 1971. Subsequently, there was regular cricket between the two nations till 1999, when there was another suspension due to the Kargil war.

However, a peace process was initiated by Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in 2004 which led to India touring Pakistan for the first time in 14 years. That launched arguably the most successful period of cricket diplomacy between India and Pakistan. Pakistan also toured India in 2007, but things took a turn for the worse the very next year.

The Indian cricket team has not travelled to Pakistan since the 2008 Asia Cup, which took place a few months before the 26/11 Mumbai attack.&nbsp;Pakistani terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba killed at least 166 people after which&nbsp;both cricketing and political ties have been tense.

The 2009 terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore further put a question mark on Pakistan's ability to provide security to traveling teams. The incident led to a decade-long suspension of Test matches in the country and cost Pakistan its co-hosting rights for the 2011 Cricket World Cup- which was hosted and won by India.

There was a brief attempt at revival with a bilateral series held in India in 2012/13, but subsequent attempts have been blocked. For any series to take place between India and Pakistan, the BCCI now requires clearance from the Indian Government. Test cricket has returned to Pakistan in 2019 with the series against Sri Lanka. Heavyweights Australia, England and New Zealand have all toured Pakistan since, but a bilateral series with India remains off the table.

<h2>Which cricket board has been more affected by the hiatus?</h2>

The fortunes of the two cricket boards over the last 15 years have been contrasting, to say the least. The BCCI has grown from strength to strength and established itself as undoubtedly the most powerful and richest cricket board in the world.

The BCCI has not been hurt by the absence of regular matches against their old rivals. The biggest success story for the Indian cricket board in the last decade has been the inception of the IPL, which is the second most valuable franchise league in the world. The IPL is the biggest money-spinner for the BCCI and it has exponentially grown the financial might of Indian cricket.

A recent ICC report revealed that India’s economy got a massive boost of $1.39 billion for organising last year’s ODI World Cup. India received a lion’s share from the ICC income to the tune of 38.5 percent, in contrast, Pakistan’s share is just 5.75 per cent. According to a BCCI document, the board's cash and bank balance for FY2024 is ₹20,686 crore (approx. $2.4 billion). Cricket Australia is next on the list with a revenue of ₹658 crore. The Pakistan Cricket Board's net worth as of September 2024 is ₹458 crore (approx. $55 million), which is approximately 1/50th of the revenue of the BCCI.

<h2>How much money do Ind-Pak Matches generate?</h2>

The fact that India &amp; Pakistan only meet each other in ICC &amp; multi-team events, it makes the clashes all the more special. It remains the most-awaited match of any ICC tournament. Demographically, 1.639 billion probable viewership comes from only India &amp; Pakistan which is almost 40 per cent of the world’s total cricket viewers. India-Pakistan match is of significant importance for the broadcasters &amp; the sponsors.

According to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), the estimated revenue generated by India-Pakistan matches in the past 20 years is approximately ₹10,000 crore or $1.3 billion. Here are some staggering stats from some notable recent India-Pak matches:

<h3>2023 ODI World Cup</h3>

Venue: Ahmedabad

Viewership: 398 Million (digital + broadcast)

<h3>2022 T20 World Cup</h3>

Venue: Melbourne

Viewership: 256 million viewing hours in India

<h3>2019 ODI World Cup</h3>

Venue: Manchester

Viewership: 321 million (digital + broadcast)

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/not-like-anyone-is-irreplaceable-ravindra-jadeja-terms-ravi-ashwins-retirement-as-golden-opportunity-785763">'Not like anyone is irreplaceable,' Ravindra Jadeja terms Ravi Ashwin's retirement as 'golden opportunity'</a>

<h2>What does the future hold?</h2>

The adoption of the hybrid model for the 2024-27 cycle will come as a major relief for all cricket fans. However, the fact that all India-Pakistan matches in the next few years will take place on neutral ground will take away some of the energy from the high-octane clashes. Some reports have suggested a triangular series could be possible involving India and Pakistan.

Such an arrangement would have to be approved by the ICC. However, the BCCI's reluctance, a packed cricket calendar and logistical challenges make it unlikely in the 2024-27 cycle. Purist cricket fans will be disappointed as the decision doesn't raise hope of a test match happening between the two nations. The last red ball India-Pakistan match was held in Bengaluru in 2007.

While India has not crossed the border in 16 years, Pakistan did so twice- for the 2016 T20 World Cup and the 2023 ODI World Cup. The latest decision marks a significant shift in the PCB's earlier stance and the board claims the move is an 'equitable arrangement' for the future. The decision certainly gives clarity for the next few years, but it won't put an end to the politicisation of cricket between the two countries.

A final decision on the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy was made on Monday after weeks of deliberation. Pakistan will host the tournament in February and March next year, but India's matches will be played at a neutral venue.

A final decision on the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy was made on Monday after weeks of deliberation. Pakistan will host the tournament in February and March next year, but India's matches will be played at a neutral venue. An agreement has been made not just for the 2025 Champions Trophy, but for the entire 2024-27 ICC cycle. India-Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the period will be played at a neutral venue. The decision marks a major development in cricketing ties between both countries, which have been affected due to the strained political relations over the last two decades. What led to the breakdown? India and Pakistan's cricketing ties have always been complex. There was no cricket played between the two countries between 1962 and 1977 due to two major wars in 1965 and 1971. Subsequently, there was regular cricket between the two nations till 1999, when there was another suspension due to the Kargil war. However, a peace process was initiated by Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in 2004 which led to India touring Pakistan for the first time in 14 years. That launched arguably the most successful period of cricket diplomacy between India and Pakistan. Pakistan also toured India in 2007, but things took a turn for the worse the very next year. The Indian cricket team has not travelled to Pakistan since the 2008 Asia Cup, which took place a few months before the 26/11 Mumbai attack. Pakistani terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba killed at least 166 people after which both cricketing and political ties have been tense. The 2009 terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore further put a question mark on Pakistan's ability to provide security to traveling teams. The incident led to a decade-long suspension of Test matches in the country and cost Pakistan its co-hosting rights for the 2011 Cricket World Cup- which was hosted and won by India. There was a brief attempt at revival with a bilateral series held in India in 2012/13, but subsequent attempts have been blocked. For any series to take place between India and Pakistan, the BCCI now requires clearance from the Indian Government. Test cricket has returned to Pakistan in 2019 with the series against Sri Lanka. Heavyweights Australia, England and New Zealand have all toured Pakistan since, but a bilateral series with India remains off the table. Which cricket board has been more affected by the hiatus? The fortunes of the two cricket boards over the last 15 years have been contrasting, to say the least. The BCCI has grown from strength to strength and established itself as undoubtedly the most powerful and richest cricket board in the world. The BCCI has not been hurt by the absence of regular matches against their old rivals. The biggest success story for the Indian cricket board in the last decade has been the inception of the IPL, which is the second most valuable franchise league in the world. The IPL is the biggest money-spinner for the BCCI and it has exponentially grown the financial might of Indian cricket. A recent ICC report revealed that India’s economy got a massive boost of $1.39 billion for organising last year’s ODI World Cup. India received a lion’s share from the ICC income to the tune of 38.5 percent, in contrast, Pakistan’s share is just 5.75 per cent. According to a BCCI document, the board's cash and bank balance for FY2024 is ₹20,686 crore (approx. $2.4 billion). Cricket Australia is next on the list with a revenue of ₹658 crore. The Pakistan Cricket Board's net worth as of September 2024 is ₹458 crore (approx. $55 million), which is approximately 1/50th of the revenue of the BCCI. How much money do Ind-Pak Matches generate? The fact that India & Pakistan only meet each other in ICC & multi-team events, it makes the clashes all the more special. It remains the most-awaited match of any ICC tournament. Demographically, 1.639 billion probable viewership comes from only India & Pakistan which is almost 40 per cent of the world’s total cricket viewers. India-Pakistan match is of significant importance for the broadcasters & the sponsors. According to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), the estimated revenue generated by India-Pakistan matches in the past 20 years is approximately ₹10,000 crore or $1.3 billion. Here are some staggering stats from some notable recent India-Pak matches: 2023 ODI World Cup Venue: Ahmedabad Viewership: 398 Million (digital + broadcast) 2022 T20 World Cup Venue: Melbourne Viewership: 256 million viewing hours in India 2019 ODI World Cup Venue: Manchester Viewership: 321 million (digital + broadcast) ALSO READ | 'Not like anyone is irreplaceable,' Ravindra Jadeja terms Ravi Ashwin's retirement as 'golden opportunity' What does the future hold? The adoption of the hybrid model for the 2024-27 cycle will come as a major relief for all cricket fans. However, the fact that all India-Pakistan matches in the next few years will take place on neutral ground will take away some of the energy from the high-octane clashes. Some reports have suggested a triangular series could be possible involving India and Pakistan. Such an arrangement would have to be approved by the ICC. However, the BCCI's reluctance, a packed cricket calendar and logistical challenges make it unlikely in the 2024-27 cycle. Purist cricket fans will be disappointed as the decision doesn't raise hope of a test match happening between the two nations. The last red ball India-Pakistan match was held in Bengaluru in 2007. While India has not crossed the border in 16 years, Pakistan did so twice- for the 2016 T20 World Cup and the 2023 ODI World Cup. The latest decision marks a significant shift in the PCB's earlier stance and the board claims the move is an 'equitable arrangement' for the future. The decision certainly gives clarity for the next few years, but it won't put an end to the politicisation of cricket between the two countries.

Dubai
Cricket’s apex body, the ICC, announced a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025, scheduled originally in Pakistan during the February-March window next year. However, with the BCCI’s refusal to send its team to Pakistan for the eight-team tournament due to security concerns, the ICC adopted this model, which they earlier went ahead with during the 2023 Asia Cup.
<h2>So, what is a hybrid model and how does it work?</h2>
India and Pakistan will be part of all ICC tournaments scheduled till 2028, per the governing body’s latest statement. 
So, how would this be possible if India denies travelling across the border and playing their arch-rivals in their country? The ICC has cracked the code, indicating the sign of things to come in the current Future Tours Programme (FTP).
ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-ashwin-shrugs-off-fathers-humiliation-remark-over-shock-retirement-says-he-isnt-media-trained-785340">BGT - Ashwin shrugs off father's ‘humiliation’ remark over shock retirement, says ‘he isn’t media trained’</a>
In a hybrid model, a neutral venue outside the designated hosting venue is added to the schedule, adjusting one team’s request to play all its matches (at that venue).
Though it has its challenges, the ICC and the host country would pick the neutral venue, considering security, logistics and other parameters. This approach ensures the participation of all teams regardless of their political situations while maintaining ICC events’ competitive integrity.
Meanwhile, in the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 case, India will play all its matches, including against host Pakistan and the knockouts, should they qualify, at a neutral venue, preferably Dubai, with Pakistan playing its games at home.
“The ICC Board has approved that all matches between India and Pakistan played at ICC Events during the current rights cycle from 2024 to 2027 (which are to be hosted in India or Pakistan) will be played at a neutral venue proposed by the tournament host,” an ICC statement read. 
The hybrid model will be adopted for the Champions Trophy 2025 (in Pakistan), 2025 Women’s World Cup (in India) and 2026 T20 World Cup (in India and Sri Lanka). While India will play its matches at a neutral venue every time Pakistan gets to host an ICC event, the Men in Green will also not travel to India for any tournament. Though with Sri Lanka co-hosting the next T20 World Cup, it becomes easier to choose that country as the venue for all Pakistan matches, it remains to be seen which neutral venue India and ICC pick for Pakistan regarding the 2025 Women’s WC. 
Moreover, with the much-debated Champions Trophy venue discussion now settled, the ICC is working on finalising the tournament's schedule, an announcement that is just around the corner. 
(With inputs from agencies)

India and Pakistan will be part of all ICC tournaments scheduled till 2028, per the governing body’s latest statement. 



Dubai Cricket’s apex body, the ICC, announced a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025, scheduled originally in Pakistan during the February-March window next year. However, with the BCCI’s refusal to send its team to Pakistan for the eight-team tournament due to security concerns, the ICC adopted this model, which they earlier went ahead with during the 2023 Asia Cup. So, what is a hybrid model and how does it work? India and Pakistan will be part of all ICC tournaments scheduled till 2028, per the governing body’s latest statement. So, how would this be possible if India denies travelling across the border and playing their arch-rivals in their country? The ICC has cracked the code, indicating the sign of things to come in the current Future Tours Programme (FTP). ALSO READ: BGT - Ashwin shrugs off father's ‘humiliation’ remark over shock retirement, says ‘he isn’t media trained’ In a hybrid model, a neutral venue outside the designated hosting venue is added to the schedule, adjusting one team’s request to play all its matches (at that venue). Though it has its challenges, the ICC and the host country would pick the neutral venue, considering security, logistics and other parameters. This approach ensures the participation of all teams regardless of their political situations while maintaining ICC events’ competitive integrity. Meanwhile, in the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 case, India will play all its matches, including against host Pakistan and the knockouts, should they qualify, at a neutral venue, preferably Dubai, with Pakistan playing its games at home. “The ICC Board has approved that all matches between India and Pakistan played at ICC Events during the current rights cycle from 2024 to 2027 (which are to be hosted in India or Pakistan) will be played at a neutral venue proposed by the tournament host,” an ICC statement read. The hybrid model will be adopted for the Champions Trophy 2025 (in Pakistan), 2025 Women’s World Cup (in India) and 2026 T20 World Cup (in India and Sri Lanka). While India will play its matches at a neutral venue every time Pakistan gets to host an ICC event, the Men in Green will also not travel to India for any tournament. Though with Sri Lanka co-hosting the next T20 World Cup, it becomes easier to choose that country as the venue for all Pakistan matches, it remains to be seen which neutral venue India and ICC pick for Pakistan regarding the 2025 Women’s WC. Moreover, with the much-debated Champions Trophy venue discussion now settled, the ICC is working on finalising the tournament's schedule, an announcement that is just around the corner. (With inputs from agencies)

Hybrid Model explained as ICC seals Champions Trophy 2025 fate

New Delhi, India 
On Dec 19 (Thursday), the International Cricket Council (ICC) approved of a hybrid model for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 edition, which will be held in Pakistan -- the original hosts -- and a neutral venue (which will host the India games). In a statement released by the ICC, it also confirmed, "India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the 2024-2027 rights cycle will be played at a neutral venue."
This means that Pakistan will also not travel to India for their games during the 2025 Women's ODI World Cup and 2026 T20 World Cup (co-hosted by India and Sri Lanka). This has been done to solve the tussle between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) as the two cricketing boards have been at loggerheads with regard to the Champions Trophy venue. After India denied travelling to Pakistan, hybrid model has been selected and will continue until the 2028 cycle.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/i-have-zero-regrets-want-to-play-for-csk-as-long-as-possible-says-r-ashwin-post-his-international-retirement-785224">I have zero regrets, want to play for CSK as long as possible, says R Ashwin post his international retirement</a>
<h2>'India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC events will be played at a neutral venue'</h2>
In this regard, the ICC further reiterated in its statement, "This (the hybrid model) applies to the upcoming ICC Men's Champions Trophy 2025 (hosted by Pakistan), set to be played in February and March 2025, as well as the ICC Women's Cricket World Cup 2025 (hosted by India) and the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026 (hosted by India and Sri Lanka)."
The ICC has also confirmed that the 2028 Women's T20 World Cup will be held in Pakistan, where the hybrid model will be considered.
Talking about the Champions Trophy, the eight-nation mega event is set to kick off on Feb 19 next year. The final schedule will be out in the coming weeks.

ICC Champions Trophy 2025 will be held in Pakistan and a neutral venue whereas the ICC has approved of a hybrid model until 2028.



New Delhi, India On Dec 19 (Thursday), the International Cricket Council (ICC) approved of a hybrid model for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 edition, which will be held in Pakistan -- the original hosts -- and a neutral venue (which will host the India games). In a statement released by the ICC, it also confirmed, "India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the 2024-2027 rights cycle will be played at a neutral venue." This means that Pakistan will also not travel to India for their games during the 2025 Women's ODI World Cup and 2026 T20 World Cup (co-hosted by India and Sri Lanka). This has been done to solve the tussle between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) as the two cricketing boards have been at loggerheads with regard to the Champions Trophy venue. After India denied travelling to Pakistan, hybrid model has been selected and will continue until the 2028 cycle. Also read: I have zero regrets, want to play for CSK as long as possible, says R Ashwin post his international retirement 'India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC events will be played at a neutral venue' In this regard, the ICC further reiterated in its statement, "This (the hybrid model) applies to the upcoming ICC Men's Champions Trophy 2025 (hosted by Pakistan), set to be played in February and March 2025, as well as the ICC Women's Cricket World Cup 2025 (hosted by India) and the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026 (hosted by India and Sri Lanka)." The ICC has also confirmed that the 2028 Women's T20 World Cup will be held in Pakistan, where the hybrid model will be considered. Talking about the Champions Trophy, the eight-nation mega event is set to kick off on Feb 19 next year. The final schedule will be out in the coming weeks.

Champions Trophy 2025 to take place in Pakistan and neutral venue, ICC approves of hybrid model until 2028

Cricket’s apex body, the ICC, announced a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025, scheduled originally in Pakistan during the February-March window next year. However, with the BCCI’s refusal to send its team to Pakistan for the eight-team tournament due to security concerns, the ICC adopted this model, which they earlier went ahead with during the 2023 Asia Cup.

<h2>So, what is a hybrid model and how does it work?</h2>

India and Pakistan will be part of all ICC tournaments scheduled till 2028, per the governing body’s latest statement.&nbsp;

So, how would this be possible if India denies travelling across the border and playing their arch-rivals in their country? The ICC has cracked the code, indicating the sign of things to come in the current Future Tours Programme (FTP).

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-ashwin-shrugs-off-fathers-humiliation-remark-over-shock-retirement-says-he-isnt-media-trained-785340">BGT - Ashwin shrugs off father's ‘humiliation’ remark over shock retirement, says ‘he isn’t media trained’</a>

In a hybrid model, a neutral venue outside the designated hosting venue is added to the schedule, adjusting one team’s request to play all its matches (at that venue).

Though it has its challenges, the ICC and the host country would pick the neutral venue, considering security, logistics and other parameters.&nbsp;This approach ensures the participation of all teams regardless of their political situations while maintaining ICC events’ competitive integrity.

Meanwhile, in the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 case, India will play all its matches, including against host Pakistan and the knockouts, should they qualify, at a neutral venue, preferably Dubai, with Pakistan playing its games at home.

“The ICC Board has approved that all matches between India and Pakistan played at ICC Events during the current rights cycle from 2024 to 2027 (which are to be hosted in India or Pakistan) will be played at a neutral venue proposed by the tournament host,” an ICC statement read.&nbsp;

The hybrid model will be adopted for the Champions Trophy 2025 (in Pakistan), 2025 Women’s World Cup (in India) and 2026 T20 World Cup (in India and Sri Lanka). While India will play its matches at a neutral venue every time Pakistan gets to host an ICC event, the Men in Green will also not travel to India for any tournament. Though with Sri Lanka co-hosting the next T20 World Cup, it becomes easier to choose that country as the venue for all Pakistan matches, it remains to be seen which neutral venue India and ICC pick for Pakistan regarding the 2025 Women’s WC.&nbsp;

Moreover, with the much-debated Champions Trophy venue discussion now settled, the ICC is working on finalising the tournament's schedule, an announcement that is just around the corner.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Cricket’s apex body, the ICC, announced a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025, scheduled originally in Pakistan during the February-March window next year.

Cricket’s apex body, the ICC, announced a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025, scheduled originally in Pakistan during the February-March window next year. However, with the BCCI’s refusal to send its team to Pakistan for the eight-team tournament due to security concerns, the ICC adopted this model, which they earlier went ahead with during the 2023 Asia Cup. So, what is a hybrid model and how does it work? India and Pakistan will be part of all ICC tournaments scheduled till 2028, per the governing body’s latest statement. So, how would this be possible if India denies travelling across the border and playing their arch-rivals in their country? The ICC has cracked the code, indicating the sign of things to come in the current Future Tours Programme (FTP). ALSO READ: BGT - Ashwin shrugs off father's ‘humiliation’ remark over shock retirement, says ‘he isn’t media trained’ In a hybrid model, a neutral venue outside the designated hosting venue is added to the schedule, adjusting one team’s request to play all its matches (at that venue). Though it has its challenges, the ICC and the host country would pick the neutral venue, considering security, logistics and other parameters. This approach ensures the participation of all teams regardless of their political situations while maintaining ICC events’ competitive integrity. Meanwhile, in the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 case, India will play all its matches, including against host Pakistan and the knockouts, should they qualify, at a neutral venue, preferably Dubai, with Pakistan playing its games at home. “The ICC Board has approved that all matches between India and Pakistan played at ICC Events during the current rights cycle from 2024 to 2027 (which are to be hosted in India or Pakistan) will be played at a neutral venue proposed by the tournament host,” an ICC statement read. The hybrid model will be adopted for the Champions Trophy 2025 (in Pakistan), 2025 Women’s World Cup (in India) and 2026 T20 World Cup (in India and Sri Lanka). While India will play its matches at a neutral venue every time Pakistan gets to host an ICC event, the Men in Green will also not travel to India for any tournament. Though with Sri Lanka co-hosting the next T20 World Cup, it becomes easier to choose that country as the venue for all Pakistan matches, it remains to be seen which neutral venue India and ICC pick for Pakistan regarding the 2025 Women’s WC. Moreover, with the much-debated Champions Trophy venue discussion now settled, the ICC is working on finalising the tournament's schedule, an announcement that is just around the corner. (With inputs from agencies)

On Dec 19 (Thursday), the International Cricket Council (ICC) approved of a hybrid model for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 edition, which will be held in Pakistan -- the original hosts -- and a neutral venue (which will host the India games). In a statement released by the ICC, it also confirmed, "India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the 2024-2027 rights cycle will be played at a neutral venue."

This means that Pakistan will also not travel to India for their games during the 2025 Women's ODI World Cup and 2026 T20 World Cup (co-hosted by India and Sri Lanka). This has been done to solve the tussle between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) as the two cricketing boards have been at loggerheads with regard to the Champions Trophy venue. After India denied travelling to Pakistan, hybrid model has been selected and will continue until the 2028 cycle.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/i-have-zero-regrets-want-to-play-for-csk-as-long-as-possible-says-r-ashwin-post-his-international-retirement-785224">I have zero regrets, want to play for CSK as long as possible, says R Ashwin post his international retirement</a>

<h2>'India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC events will be played at a neutral venue'</h2>

In this regard, the ICC further reiterated in its statement, "This (the hybrid model) applies to the upcoming ICC Men's Champions Trophy 2025 (hosted by Pakistan), set to be played in February and March 2025, as well as the ICC Women's Cricket World Cup 2025 (hosted by India) and the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026 (hosted by India and Sri Lanka)."

The ICC has also confirmed that the 2028 Women's T20 World Cup will be held in Pakistan, where the hybrid model will be considered.

Talking about the Champions Trophy, the eight-nation mega event is set to kick off&nbsp;on Feb 19 next year. The final schedule will be out in the coming weeks.

On Dec 19 (Thursday), the International Cricket Council (ICC) approved of a hybrid model for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 edition, which will be held in Pakistan -- the original hosts -- and a neutral venue (which will host the India games).

On Dec 19 (Thursday), the International Cricket Council (ICC) approved of a hybrid model for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 edition, which will be held in Pakistan -- the original hosts -- and a neutral venue (which will host the India games). In a statement released by the ICC, it also confirmed, "India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC Events during the 2024-2027 rights cycle will be played at a neutral venue." This means that Pakistan will also not travel to India for their games during the 2025 Women's ODI World Cup and 2026 T20 World Cup (co-hosted by India and Sri Lanka). This has been done to solve the tussle between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) as the two cricketing boards have been at loggerheads with regard to the Champions Trophy venue. After India denied travelling to Pakistan, hybrid model has been selected and will continue until the 2028 cycle. Also read: I have zero regrets, want to play for CSK as long as possible, says R Ashwin post his international retirement 'India and Pakistan matches hosted by either country at ICC events will be played at a neutral venue' In this regard, the ICC further reiterated in its statement, "This (the hybrid model) applies to the upcoming ICC Men's Champions Trophy 2025 (hosted by Pakistan), set to be played in February and March 2025, as well as the ICC Women's Cricket World Cup 2025 (hosted by India) and the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026 (hosted by India and Sri Lanka)." The ICC has also confirmed that the 2028 Women's T20 World Cup will be held in Pakistan, where the hybrid model will be considered. Talking about the Champions Trophy, the eight-nation mega event is set to kick off on Feb 19 next year. The final schedule will be out in the coming weeks.

The saga surrounding the Champions Trophy 2025 is over as the International Cricket Council (ICC) has approved the hybrid mode, meaning India will not travel to Pakistan for the coveted tournament. The decision came on Friday (Dec 13) evening through prominent sources as the tournament is finally set to get a green light. On the other hand, the deal also means Pakistan will not travel to India for the 2026 T20 World Cup.

<h2>Champions Trophy to be held in hybrid model</h2>

After a series of meetings in Dubai last week, a deal was struck between the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the ICC, meaning neither India nor Pakistan will play in the backyard of their arch-rivals. As part of the deal, PCB is reported to get an added share in revenue. While the venue and the structure of matches remain in limbo, it is reported that one semifinal and the final will be staged in Dubai alongside India’s matches.

However, if India fail&nbsp;to make the knockout stage of the tournament, the entire knockout stage will be hosted by Pakistan.

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-gabba-test-preview-redemption-or-repetition-india-australia-gear-up-for-blockbuster-clash-783727">BGT, Gabba Test Preview: Redemption or repetition? India-Australia gear up for blockbuster clash</a>

<h2>How will the format work?</h2>

With two groups of four teams each, India’s three group stage matches will be hosted in UAE’s Dubai International Stadium according to early reports. The venue will also serve as host for at least one semifinal and the final if India reach the knockout stage. Teams getting drawn with India will have logistical issues to face as they will have to travel between Pakistan and UAE during the tournament.

Apart from Dubai, three other venues for the tournament include Pakistan’s Lahore, Rawalpindi and Karachi.

If everything goes according to plan, the Champions Trophy is set to start on scheduled dates of February 19 with the final taking place on March 8 in Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium.

The saga surrounding the Champions Trophy 2025 is over as the International Cricket Council (ICC) has approved the hybrid mode, meaning India will not travel to Pakistan for the coveted tournament.

The saga surrounding the Champions Trophy 2025 is over as the International Cricket Council (ICC) has approved the hybrid mode, meaning India will not travel to Pakistan for the coveted tournament. The decision came on Friday (Dec 13) evening through prominent sources as the tournament is finally set to get a green light. On the other hand, the deal also means Pakistan will not travel to India for the 2026 T20 World Cup. Champions Trophy to be held in hybrid model After a series of meetings in Dubai last week, a deal was struck between the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the ICC, meaning neither India nor Pakistan will play in the backyard of their arch-rivals. As part of the deal, PCB is reported to get an added share in revenue. While the venue and the structure of matches remain in limbo, it is reported that one semifinal and the final will be staged in Dubai alongside India’s matches. However, if India fail to make the knockout stage of the tournament, the entire knockout stage will be hosted by Pakistan. ALSO READ | BGT, Gabba Test Preview: Redemption or repetition? India-Australia gear up for blockbuster clash How will the format work? With two groups of four teams each, India’s three group stage matches will be hosted in UAE’s Dubai International Stadium according to early reports. The venue will also serve as host for at least one semifinal and the final if India reach the knockout stage. Teams getting drawn with India will have logistical issues to face as they will have to travel between Pakistan and UAE during the tournament. Apart from Dubai, three other venues for the tournament include Pakistan’s Lahore, Rawalpindi and Karachi. If everything goes according to plan, the Champions Trophy is set to start on scheduled dates of February 19 with the final taking place on March 8 in Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium.

Champions Trophy 2025: ICC approves hybrid model after long saga, India to play in Dubai - Report

Indian seamer Mohammed Siraj and Adelaide’s Player of the Match Travis Head from Australia may face ICC’s disciplinary hearing for their verbal brawl in the second BGT Test, which the hosts won by 10 wickets. Both players are on ICC’s radar as milder repercussions loom, according to reports.

Siraj and Head might face a disciplinary hearing for their on-field antics that made headlines worldwide, reported&nbsp;The Daily Telegraph.

The incident happened during the 82nd over in Australia’s first innings, when, after dismissing Head of a searing Yorker, Siraj gave him a fiery yet ugly sendoff, gesturing aggressively towards the dressing room.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
A century, a send-off, Travis Head reflects on a day full of action <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvIND?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvIND</a> <a href="https://t.co/cNRZ5lxnSz">pic.twitter.com/cNRZ5lxnSz</a>
— cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) <a href="https://twitter.com/cricketcomau/status/1865544823689953504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 7, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

That, however, led to the Adelaide crowd coming hard on Siraj every time he fielded near the boundary or even when he came on to bat in the second innings by booing him, expressing displeasure at his conduct.&nbsp;

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/sherfane-rutherfords-maiden-hundred-guides-west-indies-home-against-bangladesh-in-1st-odi-782555">Sherfane Rutherford’s maiden hundred guides West Indies home against Bangladesh in 1st ODI</a>

Though both let it slide under the mat afterwards, Siraj and Head would not get away with this without warning.

The ICC might not punish them by slapping suspensions as such incidents mostly garner milder penalties.

<h2>Who said what?</h2>

Head hit a brilliant 140 off 141 balls against India in the second innings, steering Australia to a massive 157-run lead. Given how he took the attack to the Indian seamers, having sent Siraj for a six just one ball before he got out, Siraj’s over-the-top reaction was always coming.

&nbsp;

The left-handed batter went on record claiming that he said ‘well-bowled’ to Siraj, but how he reacted to that disappointed Head. Though he expressed regrets over his reaction to his dismissal, Head defended his decision to stand his ground.&nbsp;

“It probably (went) a little bit far; that’s why I’m disappointed in the reaction I gave back, but I’m also going to stand up for myself. Like to think in our team, we wouldn’t do that. [It’s] not the way I’d like to play the game and feel like my teammates are the same. If I see that, I probably call it out, which I did,” Head said during the press conference after the second day’s play.

<h3>Head lied, says Siraj</h3>

The Indian seamer broke his silence ahead of the start of the third day’s play in Adelaide, claiming Head never said ‘well-bowled’ to him and that it was something else.&nbsp;

“When you get hit for a six on a good ball, it fires you up differently. And when I got him bowled, I only celebrated, and he abused me, and you saw that on TV, too," Siraj said in a chat with Star Sports.&nbsp;

“I only celebrated at the start; I didn’t say anything to him. What he said in the press conference wasn’t right; it’s a lie that he only said ‘well bowled’ to me. It’s there for everyone to see that that’s not what he said to me. We respect everyone; it’s not like we disrespect other players. I respect everybody because cricket is a gentleman’s game, but what he did wasn’t right. I didn’t like it at all,” he noted.

With the five-match series drawn 1-1, the third Test will get underway at the Gabba in Brisbane on December 14.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Indian seamer Mohammed Siraj and Adelaide’s Player of the Match Travis Head from Australia may face ICC’s disciplinary hearing for their verbal brawl in the second BGT Test, which the hosts won by 10 wickets.

Indian seamer Mohammed Siraj and Adelaide’s Player of the Match Travis Head from Australia may face ICC’s disciplinary hearing for their verbal brawl in the second BGT Test, which the hosts won by 10 wickets. Both players are on ICC’s radar as milder repercussions loom, according to reports. Siraj and Head might face a disciplinary hearing for their on-field antics that made headlines worldwide, reported The Daily Telegraph. The incident happened during the 82nd over in Australia’s first innings, when, after dismissing Head of a searing Yorker, Siraj gave him a fiery yet ugly sendoff, gesturing aggressively towards the dressing room. A century, a send-off, Travis Head reflects on a day full of action #AUSvIND pic.twitter.com/cNRZ5lxnSz — cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) December 7, 2024 × That, however, led to the Adelaide crowd coming hard on Siraj every time he fielded near the boundary or even when he came on to bat in the second innings by booing him, expressing displeasure at his conduct. ALSO READ: Sherfane Rutherford’s maiden hundred guides West Indies home against Bangladesh in 1st ODI Though both let it slide under the mat afterwards, Siraj and Head would not get away with this without warning. The ICC might not punish them by slapping suspensions as such incidents mostly garner milder penalties. Who said what? Head hit a brilliant 140 off 141 balls against India in the second innings, steering Australia to a massive 157-run lead. Given how he took the attack to the Indian seamers, having sent Siraj for a six just one ball before he got out, Siraj’s over-the-top reaction was always coming. The left-handed batter went on record claiming that he said ‘well-bowled’ to Siraj, but how he reacted to that disappointed Head. Though he expressed regrets over his reaction to his dismissal, Head defended his decision to stand his ground. “It probably (went) a little bit far; that’s why I’m disappointed in the reaction I gave back, but I’m also going to stand up for myself. Like to think in our team, we wouldn’t do that. [It’s] not the way I’d like to play the game and feel like my teammates are the same. If I see that, I probably call it out, which I did,” Head said during the press conference after the second day’s play. Head lied, says Siraj The Indian seamer broke his silence ahead of the start of the third day’s play in Adelaide, claiming Head never said ‘well-bowled’ to him and that it was something else. “When you get hit for a six on a good ball, it fires you up differently. And when I got him bowled, I only celebrated, and he abused me, and you saw that on TV, too," Siraj said in a chat with Star Sports. “I only celebrated at the start; I didn’t say anything to him. What he said in the press conference wasn’t right; it’s a lie that he only said ‘well bowled’ to me. It’s there for everyone to see that that’s not what he said to me. We respect everyone; it’s not like we disrespect other players. I respect everybody because cricket is a gentleman’s game, but what he did wasn’t right. I didn’t like it at all,” he noted. With the five-match series drawn 1-1, the third Test will get underway at the Gabba in Brisbane on December 14. (With inputs from agencies)

BGT: Siraj, Head may face repercussions for Adelaide brawl as ICC’s disciplinary hearing looms - Report

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has approached its government for final approval after reports of them accepting the BCCI and ICC’s proposal of a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025 surfaced online. Per the latest developments, the PCB has agreed to share hosting rights of the eight-team tournament with the United Arab Emirates (potentially), with India playing all its matches in Dubai, including the semis and final, should they qualify.&nbsp;

Lahore, one of the three venues for CT 2025, will be kept as a backup should India fail to cruise to the last four or summit clash. A formal announcement will be issued on Saturday (Dec 7) as the ICC board meeting, scheduled for Thursday (Dec 5), got postponed.

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-that-doesnt-happen-in-australia-i-know-it-happens-in-india-ryan-harris-rubbishes-faction-reports-781796">BGT: 'That doesn’t happen in Australia; I know it happens in India’ – Ryan Harris rubbishes faction reports</a>

However, the biggest breaking from the report published in Times of India (TOI) is that the PCB will follow BCCI’s path – meaning just like India will not travel to Pakistan (because of security concerns) for the Champions Trophy 2025, Pakistan will not tour India for any ICC event at least until 2027, when the ongoing media rights cycle ends.&nbsp;

It further leads to India and Pakistan being confined to playing at neutral venues in all ICC tournaments (for men’s and women’s). Despite India hosting the Women’s World Cup and Asia Cup next year and co-hosting the Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 with Sri Lanka, Pakistan will not travel to India as neutral venues to stage their matches.

Moreover, several reports also claim that the PCB will not get any additional compensation for sharing the hosting rights, with the ICC also denying increasing their revenue share.

With all parties concerned coming onto the same page after weeks of discussions and denials, the ICC could be working on the final schedule for the Champions Trophy scheduled for the February-March window next year.

<h2>Jay Shah’s first day as ICC chair</h2>

The former BCCI secretary, Jay Shah, took over as the new chairman of the apex body, attending the broadcaster’s workshop in Dubai (ICC headquarters), and meeting board members, staff and media rights partners.&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
A great start at the <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ICC</a> HQ connecting with my colleagues on the Board and the ICC team. Let the work begin! <a href="https://t.co/QgbDoPDdBK">pic.twitter.com/QgbDoPDdBK</a>
— Jay Shah (@JayShah) <a href="https://twitter.com/JayShah/status/1864679866718617659?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 5, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

He addressed the media and extended his heartfelt thanks.

“I want to extend my heartfelt thanks to the ICC Board members, the ICC team, and everyone who contributed to making my first day at the ICC Headquarters as Chair a truly memorable experience. This visit provided an invaluable opportunity to connect with my colleagues on the ICC Board, where we discussed the initial roadmap and strategies to shape the future of this incredible sport.

“I was equally delighted to meet with the dedicated ICC team working tirelessly behind the scenes to propel cricket forward. Their passion and shared belief in the sport's immense potential are truly inspiring, as is their enthusiasm for the exciting opportunities ahead.&nbsp;

"Today has been both productive and inspiring. While I am encouraged by what I have seen, I recognise that this is just the beginning. The hard work to elevate cricket to unprecedented heights starts now, and I am confident that together, we will deliver on this vision," Shah said as quoted in the ICC media release.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has approached its government for final approval after reports of them accepting the BCCI and ICC’s proposal of a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025 surfaced online.

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has approached its government for final approval after reports of them accepting the BCCI and ICC’s proposal of a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025 surfaced online. Per the latest developments, the PCB has agreed to share hosting rights of the eight-team tournament with the United Arab Emirates (potentially), with India playing all its matches in Dubai, including the semis and final, should they qualify. Lahore, one of the three venues for CT 2025, will be kept as a backup should India fail to cruise to the last four or summit clash. A formal announcement will be issued on Saturday (Dec 7) as the ICC board meeting, scheduled for Thursday (Dec 5), got postponed. ALSO READ: BGT: 'That doesn’t happen in Australia; I know it happens in India’ – Ryan Harris rubbishes faction reports However, the biggest breaking from the report published in Times of India (TOI) is that the PCB will follow BCCI’s path – meaning just like India will not travel to Pakistan (because of security concerns) for the Champions Trophy 2025, Pakistan will not tour India for any ICC event at least until 2027, when the ongoing media rights cycle ends. It further leads to India and Pakistan being confined to playing at neutral venues in all ICC tournaments (for men’s and women’s). Despite India hosting the Women’s World Cup and Asia Cup next year and co-hosting the Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 with Sri Lanka, Pakistan will not travel to India as neutral venues to stage their matches. Moreover, several reports also claim that the PCB will not get any additional compensation for sharing the hosting rights, with the ICC also denying increasing their revenue share. With all parties concerned coming onto the same page after weeks of discussions and denials, the ICC could be working on the final schedule for the Champions Trophy scheduled for the February-March window next year. Jay Shah’s first day as ICC chair The former BCCI secretary, Jay Shah, took over as the new chairman of the apex body, attending the broadcaster’s workshop in Dubai (ICC headquarters), and meeting board members, staff and media rights partners. A great start at the @ICC HQ connecting with my colleagues on the Board and the ICC team. Let the work begin! pic.twitter.com/QgbDoPDdBK — Jay Shah (@JayShah) December 5, 2024 × He addressed the media and extended his heartfelt thanks. “I want to extend my heartfelt thanks to the ICC Board members, the ICC team, and everyone who contributed to making my first day at the ICC Headquarters as Chair a truly memorable experience. This visit provided an invaluable opportunity to connect with my colleagues on the ICC Board, where we discussed the initial roadmap and strategies to shape the future of this incredible sport. “I was equally delighted to meet with the dedicated ICC team working tirelessly behind the scenes to propel cricket forward. Their passion and shared belief in the sport's immense potential are truly inspiring, as is their enthusiasm for the exciting opportunities ahead. "Today has been both productive and inspiring. While I am encouraged by what I have seen, I recognise that this is just the beginning. The hard work to elevate cricket to unprecedented heights starts now, and I am confident that together, we will deliver on this vision," Shah said as quoted in the ICC media release. (With inputs from agencies)

Champions Trophy: 'PCB to follow BCCI’s path after hybrid model approval; official announcement soon'

Cricket Australia on Thursday defended its decision to boycott only some games against Afghanistan after the departing boss of the world governing body accused them of hypocrisy.

Australia have in recent years refused to play bilateral series against Afghanistan, citing discomfort at an ongoing Taliban crackdown on women's sport. But they continue to face Afghanistan in major tournaments such as the World Cup, including a famous loss in the T20 tournament earlier this year.

International Cricket Council chairman Greg Barclay said if Australia wanted to take a stand, they should walk away from World Cup games as well.

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-2024-25-rohit-sharma-confirms-kl-rahul-as-opener-for-adelaide-test-reveals-his-batting-slot-781671">BGT 2024-25: Rohit Sharma confirms KL Rahul as opener for Adelaide Test, reveals his batting slot</a>

"If you want to make a political statement, don't play them in a World Cup," he told the UK's Daily Telegraph newspaper. "Sure, it might cost you a semi-final place, but principles are principles. It's not about having half a principle," added Barclay.

Cricket Australia chairman Mike Baird said he was "very proud of the position we've taken".

"We've taken a position, and we're proudly standing up where we think we should," he said, according to Australian media. "There's all types of lines you can draw. We've drawn a line. We've taken a position, and we're proudly standing up where we think we should."

Australia in March scrapped a T20 men's series against Afghanistan, saying the situation for women in the Taliban-ruled country was deteriorating.

It was the third time since 2021 that Australia refused to play Afghanistan outside of international tournaments.

Before the return of the Taliban, Afghanistan's cricket board was slowly making progress, growing the game among women and contracting a small number of semi-professional players in 2020.

Many of those players eventually fled to Australia.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Cricket Australia on Thursday defended its decision to boycott only some games against Afghanistan after the departing boss of the world governing body accused them of hypocrisy.

Cricket Australia on Thursday defended its decision to boycott only some games against Afghanistan after the departing boss of the world governing body accused them of hypocrisy. Australia have in recent years refused to play bilateral series against Afghanistan, citing discomfort at an ongoing Taliban crackdown on women's sport. But they continue to face Afghanistan in major tournaments such as the World Cup, including a famous loss in the T20 tournament earlier this year. International Cricket Council chairman Greg Barclay said if Australia wanted to take a stand, they should walk away from World Cup games as well. ALSO READ: BGT 2024-25: Rohit Sharma confirms KL Rahul as opener for Adelaide Test, reveals his batting slot "If you want to make a political statement, don't play them in a World Cup," he told the UK's Daily Telegraph newspaper. "Sure, it might cost you a semi-final place, but principles are principles. It's not about having half a principle," added Barclay. Cricket Australia chairman Mike Baird said he was "very proud of the position we've taken". "We've taken a position, and we're proudly standing up where we think we should," he said, according to Australian media. "There's all types of lines you can draw. We've drawn a line. We've taken a position, and we're proudly standing up where we think we should." Australia in March scrapped a T20 men's series against Afghanistan, saying the situation for women in the Taliban-ruled country was deteriorating. It was the third time since 2021 that Australia refused to play Afghanistan outside of international tournaments. Before the return of the Taliban, Afghanistan's cricket board was slowly making progress, growing the game among women and contracting a small number of semi-professional players in 2020. Many of those players eventually fled to Australia. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Cricket Australia defends Afghanistan boycott stance after hypocrisy remarks

India’s Jay Shah is all set to take charge of his first meeting as the chairperson of the International Cricket Council (ICC) on Thursday (Dec 5) as he begins the new term. Shah officially took office on Dec 1 succeeding Greg Barclay and became the latest Indian personality to head the ICC. While his first meeting will be part of officially taking over the office, the suspense surrounding the Champions Trophy could be on the table.

<h2>Shah to host first meeting</h2>

After Barclay pulled out of the race for the top spot in ICC in September, Shah became the chairperson of the ICC board of directors with office officially beginning on Dec 1. Shah will be joined by the 16 directors of the ICC on Thursday as they aim to start the functioning of his reign. However, the main focus could be the Champions Trophy as the schedule is yet to be confirmed despite less than 90 days remaining for the coveted tournament to start.

As things stand, the tournament is set to go ahead in a hybrid model which has been accepted by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). However, their latest demands have not gone well with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and other members of the ICC. PCB has conveyed that they won’t be traveling to India for any ICC events in the future and will play in a hybrid model against their arch-rivals.

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-2024-25-adelaide-the-ground-where-virat-kohli-gave-sneak-peek-into-indias-future-on-tour-of-2014-781541">BGT 2024-25: Adelaide | The ground where Virat Kohli gave sneak peek into India's future on tour of 2014</a>

However, according to the report the demand was denied by all the members present which include 12 full member nations, three associate nations and the ICC Chairman.

If the hybrid model is made official, India is likely to play its matches in UAE or Sri Lanka with Pakistan hosting the rest of the tournament. One of the semifinals and the final of the Champions Trophy will also take place in hybrid model to accommodate India, in case they reach the later stages of the tournament.

India’s Jay Shah is all set to take charge of his first meeting as the chairperson of the International Cricket Council (ICC) on Thursday (Dec 5) as he begins the new term.

India’s Jay Shah is all set to take charge of his first meeting as the chairperson of the International Cricket Council (ICC) on Thursday (Dec 5) as he begins the new term. Shah officially took office on Dec 1 succeeding Greg Barclay and became the latest Indian personality to head the ICC. While his first meeting will be part of officially taking over the office, the suspense surrounding the Champions Trophy could be on the table. Shah to host first meeting After Barclay pulled out of the race for the top spot in ICC in September, Shah became the chairperson of the ICC board of directors with office officially beginning on Dec 1. Shah will be joined by the 16 directors of the ICC on Thursday as they aim to start the functioning of his reign. However, the main focus could be the Champions Trophy as the schedule is yet to be confirmed despite less than 90 days remaining for the coveted tournament to start. As things stand, the tournament is set to go ahead in a hybrid model which has been accepted by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). However, their latest demands have not gone well with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and other members of the ICC. PCB has conveyed that they won’t be traveling to India for any ICC events in the future and will play in a hybrid model against their arch-rivals. ALSO READ | BGT 2024-25: Adelaide | The ground where Virat Kohli gave sneak peek into India's future on tour of 2014 However, according to the report the demand was denied by all the members present which include 12 full member nations, three associate nations and the ICC Chairman. If the hybrid model is made official, India is likely to play its matches in UAE or Sri Lanka with Pakistan hosting the rest of the tournament. One of the semifinals and the final of the Champions Trophy will also take place in hybrid model to accommodate India, in case they reach the later stages of the tournament.

New ICC Chairperson Jay Shah to hold first meeting as Champions Trophy fate hangs in balance

Former Pakistan speedster Shoaib Akhtar has made a staggering claim about Champions Trophy 2025 venue stance. Several reports claim that the PCB accepted the hybrid model, where India will play all its matches in the UAE (alternative venue), including the semis and the final, should India qualify, while Pakistan will play all its matches at home; Akhtar said this deal was perhaps already signed earlier.

Earlier, the BCCI informed the ICC of its stance of not sending the Indian Team across the border for the eight-team tournament due to tense relations between both countries; instead, the ICC and BCCI offered the PCB a hybrid model proposal, similar to what they accepted for the 2023 Asia Cup.&nbsp;

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/ajinkya-rahane-not-venkatesh-iyer-leads-race-to-captain-kkr-in-ipl-2025-report-780769">Ajinkya Rahane, not Venkatesh Iyer, leads race to captain KKR in IPL 2025 – Report</a>

Though the Pakistan Board remained firm on not accepting this at any cost, they lowered their ground after the apex body’s two-day deadline warning. Per some reports, the ICC asked PCB to say yes to this proposal, or else upon refusing, they could lose the hosting rights altogether, with either the UAE or South Africa roped in as alternative hosts.&nbsp;

Fearing losing the hosting rights, the PCB seemed to have agreed to the hybrid model but has placed some conditions. The two main conditions are that Pakistan will adopt the hybrid-for-hybrid model solution while touring India during the current FTP, where India is hosting three men’s ICC tournaments and the women’s T20 World Cup.&nbsp;

The second one is that the ICC should increase Pakistan’s revenue share from six per cent, which the governing body denied outright but vows to pay compensation over and above the hosting fees. The BCCI, however, hasn’t responded to any of the demands, per a report in the Times of India (TOI).

<h2>Akhtar's thoughts on CT venue row</h2>

Meanwhile, Akhtar acknowledged PCB’s call to stand by their stance.

“You are getting paid for hosting rights and revenue, and that's fine—we all understand it. Pakistan's stance is also reasonable. They should have maintained a strong position—why not? Once we are able to host the Champions Trophy in our country and they are unwilling to come, they should share the revenue with us at a higher rate. That’s a good call,” Akhtar said while speaking on Pakistan’s media channel, as quoted by Hindustan Times.

He, however, shared different views on what Pakistan should do should India decide against touring Pakistan.

"In terms of playing in India in the future, we should extend a hand of friendship and go there. My belief has always been: go to India and defeat them there—India mein khelo aur wahi unhe maarke aao (play in India and beat them on their home ground). I understand that the hybrid model had already been signed earlier," Akhtar noted.&nbsp;

The ICC, in accordance with the BCCI and PCB, will come up with a final decision sooner, with the reports suggesting that they are also working on the final schedule.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Former Pakistan speedster Shoaib Akhtar has made a staggering claim about Champions Trophy 2025 venue stance. Several reports claim that the PCB accepted the hybrid model, where India will play all its matches in the UAE (alternative venue), including the semis and the final, should India qualify, while Pakistan will play all its matches at home; Akhtar said this deal was perhaps already signed earlier.

Former Pakistan speedster Shoaib Akhtar has made a staggering claim about Champions Trophy 2025 venue stance. Several reports claim that the PCB accepted the hybrid model, where India will play all its matches in the UAE (alternative venue), including the semis and the final, should India qualify, while Pakistan will play all its matches at home; Akhtar said this deal was perhaps already signed earlier. Earlier, the BCCI informed the ICC of its stance of not sending the Indian Team across the border for the eight-team tournament due to tense relations between both countries; instead, the ICC and BCCI offered the PCB a hybrid model proposal, similar to what they accepted for the 2023 Asia Cup. ALSO READ: Ajinkya Rahane, not Venkatesh Iyer, leads race to captain KKR in IPL 2025 – Report Though the Pakistan Board remained firm on not accepting this at any cost, they lowered their ground after the apex body’s two-day deadline warning. Per some reports, the ICC asked PCB to say yes to this proposal, or else upon refusing, they could lose the hosting rights altogether, with either the UAE or South Africa roped in as alternative hosts. Fearing losing the hosting rights, the PCB seemed to have agreed to the hybrid model but has placed some conditions. The two main conditions are that Pakistan will adopt the hybrid-for-hybrid model solution while touring India during the current FTP, where India is hosting three men’s ICC tournaments and the women’s T20 World Cup. The second one is that the ICC should increase Pakistan’s revenue share from six per cent, which the governing body denied outright but vows to pay compensation over and above the hosting fees. The BCCI, however, hasn’t responded to any of the demands, per a report in the Times of India (TOI). Akhtar's thoughts on CT venue row Meanwhile, Akhtar acknowledged PCB’s call to stand by their stance. “You are getting paid for hosting rights and revenue, and that's fine—we all understand it. Pakistan's stance is also reasonable. They should have maintained a strong position—why not? Once we are able to host the Champions Trophy in our country and they are unwilling to come, they should share the revenue with us at a higher rate. That’s a good call,” Akhtar said while speaking on Pakistan’s media channel, as quoted by Hindustan Times. He, however, shared different views on what Pakistan should do should India decide against touring Pakistan. "In terms of playing in India in the future, we should extend a hand of friendship and go there. My belief has always been: go to India and defeat them there—India mein khelo aur wahi unhe maarke aao (play in India and beat them on their home ground). I understand that the hybrid model had already been signed earlier," Akhtar noted. The ICC, in accordance with the BCCI and PCB, will come up with a final decision sooner, with the reports suggesting that they are also working on the final schedule. (With inputs from agencies)

Shoaib Akhtar makes staggering claim on Champions Trophy 2025 venue row, says ‘hybrid model had already…’

Following a month-long drama on finalising the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 venue, hosts Pakistan has agreed to the hybrid model but has placed a few conditions in its response, latest reports suggest.

While Pakistan has approved ICC's suggestion of India playing its CT 2025 matches in Dubai, including the semis and the final&nbsp;should they qualify, it has set a few demands, including a sizeable chunk of ICC's revenue as compensation.

Pakistan lowered its guard in accepting BCCI and ICC’s offer of co-hosting the eight-team tournament scheduled for February- March next year,&nbsp;The Times of India (TOI) newspaper said in a report.

Due to tense relations between India and Pakistan, none has toured each other for a bilateral series since 2012, with the arch rivals facing off in just ICC events and Asia Cup.&nbsp;

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/bgt-202425-scott-boland-urges-australia-not-to-press-panic-button-after-perth-test-shocker-780594">BGT 2024/25: Scott Boland urges Australia not to press panic button after Perth Test shocker</a>

Even last year, when Pakistan was supposed to host the Asia Cup, the BCCI refused to send its team across the border due to&nbsp;security concerns.

Subsequently, Sri Lanka was roped in as the last-minute co-host and India played all of its matches there, including the final, which they won.

<h2>What are PCB's conditions?</h2>

Pakistan was never going to agree to the hybrid model for nothing. Reports citing&nbsp;sources said the PCB wants a hybrid-for-hybrid solution to subsequent ICC tournaments to be held in India in the current FTP cycle till 2031.&nbsp;

India will host three men’s ICC events and the women’s World Cup during this window. While they co-host the 2026 T20 World Cup with Sri Lanka, Bangladesh will share hosting rights for the 50-over World Cup in 2031. Also, India will host the 2029 ICC Champions Trophy, with the women’s WC scheduled to be held next year.

Besides, the PCB has asked for a sizeable share of ICC revenue as compensation for sharing Champions Trophy 2025 hosting rights. As things stand, the BCCI gets 38 per cent of ICC revenue, while Pakistan pockets a minute chunk of less than six per cent. The reports further suggest that ICC has offered compensation value over and above the hosting fees but is unlikely to agree to increase PCB’s revenue share for accepting the hybrid model.

Meanwhile, the sources also claim that ICC and BCCI stood their ground on hosting the Champions Trophy in the hybrid model, with the PCB fearing losing the hosting rights altogether should they decide against accepting it. Although there is no official announcement yet, the BCCI hasn’t committed to any of the demands either.&nbsp;

It is also expected that the final schedule of the Champions Trophy 2025 will be worked on in the coming week, with its release just around the corner.

<h3>What happens if BCCI accepts PCB’s demands?</h3>

Should BCCI agree to the demands of the PCB, Pakistan will play its 2026 T20 World Cup and 2031 ODI World Cup matches in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, respectively; however, Pakistan will play their knockout matches in India should they qualify.&nbsp;

The final call on their participation in the 2025 women’s T20 World Cup and the 2029 ICC Champions Trophy, two tournaments to be held in India solely, will be taken in due course.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Following a month-long drama on finalising the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 venue, hosts Pakistan has agreed to the hybrid model but has placed a few conditions in its response, latest reports suggest.

Following a month-long drama on finalising the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 venue, hosts Pakistan has agreed to the hybrid model but has placed a few conditions in its response, latest reports suggest. While Pakistan has approved ICC's suggestion of India playing its CT 2025 matches in Dubai, including the semis and the final should they qualify, it has set a few demands, including a sizeable chunk of ICC's revenue as compensation. Pakistan lowered its guard in accepting BCCI and ICC’s offer of co-hosting the eight-team tournament scheduled for February- March next year, The Times of India (TOI) newspaper said in a report. Due to tense relations between India and Pakistan, none has toured each other for a bilateral series since 2012, with the arch rivals facing off in just ICC events and Asia Cup. ALSO READ: BGT 2024/25: Scott Boland urges Australia not to press panic button after Perth Test shocker Even last year, when Pakistan was supposed to host the Asia Cup, the BCCI refused to send its team across the border due to security concerns. Subsequently, Sri Lanka was roped in as the last-minute co-host and India played all of its matches there, including the final, which they won. What are PCB's conditions? Pakistan was never going to agree to the hybrid model for nothing. Reports citing sources said the PCB wants a hybrid-for-hybrid solution to subsequent ICC tournaments to be held in India in the current FTP cycle till 2031. India will host three men’s ICC events and the women’s World Cup during this window. While they co-host the 2026 T20 World Cup with Sri Lanka, Bangladesh will share hosting rights for the 50-over World Cup in 2031. Also, India will host the 2029 ICC Champions Trophy, with the women’s WC scheduled to be held next year. Besides, the PCB has asked for a sizeable share of ICC revenue as compensation for sharing Champions Trophy 2025 hosting rights. As things stand, the BCCI gets 38 per cent of ICC revenue, while Pakistan pockets a minute chunk of less than six per cent. The reports further suggest that ICC has offered compensation value over and above the hosting fees but is unlikely to agree to increase PCB’s revenue share for accepting the hybrid model. Meanwhile, the sources also claim that ICC and BCCI stood their ground on hosting the Champions Trophy in the hybrid model, with the PCB fearing losing the hosting rights altogether should they decide against accepting it. Although there is no official announcement yet, the BCCI hasn’t committed to any of the demands either. It is also expected that the final schedule of the Champions Trophy 2025 will be worked on in the coming week, with its release just around the corner. What happens if BCCI accepts PCB’s demands? Should BCCI agree to the demands of the PCB, Pakistan will play its 2026 T20 World Cup and 2031 ODI World Cup matches in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, respectively; however, Pakistan will play their knockout matches in India should they qualify. The final call on their participation in the 2025 women’s T20 World Cup and the 2029 ICC Champions Trophy, two tournaments to be held in India solely, will be taken in due course. (With inputs from agencies)

Champions Trophy 2025: Pakistan agrees to hybrid model but places few conditions – Report

The BCCI’s refusal to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 has put the apex body in hot waters as they missed the contractual deadline (for schedule announcement), with major financial repercussions looming. With the Indian Cricket Board deciding against sending its team across the border for the eight-team tournament, the ICC is trying to convince the host board (PCB) to accept the hybrid model in the upcoming emergency meet.

Per the Champions Trophy 2025 contractual commitment, the ICC should have released the final dates and schedule of this tournament 90 days before it begins, which is February 19, 2025; since they have missed the deadline, with the final announcement expected anytime next week, the delay seems to have affected the broadcasters, all stakeholders and business partners, piling pressure on ICC.

ALSO READ:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/ct-2025-once-jay-shah-takes-charge-as-icc-chairman-pcb-chief-says-will-do-whats-best-for-pak-cricket-779796">CT 2025: 'Once Jay Shah takes charge as ICC chairman...', PCB chief says 'will do what's best for Pak cricket'</a>

On the other hand, the PCB has also expressed displeasure over ICC taking longer to solve this issue. Per a report in Cricbuzz, a senior PCB official has approached ICC CEO Geoff Allardice seeking answers to what the future holds, with the chances of them staging the tournament in Pakistan hanging by a thin thread.

<h2>Changes troubling ICC</h2>

Meanwhile, the ICC proposed a hybrid model to the PCB, suggesting Pakistan could play its matches in their country, while an alternative venue, not chosen yet, will host all India matches, including the semis or final, should India qualify.&nbsp;

In another scenario, should the PCB decide to accept it but with a condition that India and Pakistan will be placed in separate groups for Pakistan to play all league matches at home, the broadcasters are against this very idea, which affects their numbers and fan engagement, with monetary loss adding salt to the injury.

The ICC is staging an emergency meeting with the BCCI and PCB spokesperson on November 29, trying to bring everyone on the same page.&nbsp;

However, should things fall in place and Pakistan reluctantly accept the new hybrid model, where they will only travel to an alternative venue to face India and play all their remaining group matches and the semis at home, the apex body could announce the final schedule quickly. But if the PCB rejects the hybrid model and boycotts the tournament in response to BCCI’s travel stance, the tournament could be held elsewhere, with another team replacing Pakistan.

In the final case scenario, the unlikeliest of them all, the tournament could get cancelled or postponed indefinitely.&nbsp;

However, there would be severe and inevitable fallouts should any of the mentioned scenarios be adopted. Pakistan could threaten to boycott all ICC events in India in the upcoming FTP, including the 2025 Women's ODI World Cup, 2025 Men's Asia Cup, 2026 Men's T20 World Cup (with Sri Lanka), 2029 Men's Champions Trophy and the 2031 ODI World Cup (with Bangladesh).

Besides, there would be separate repercussions for any team boycotting an ICC event.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

The BCCI’s refusal to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 has put the apex body in hot waters as they missed the contractual deadline (for schedule announcement), with major financial repercussions looming.

The BCCI’s refusal to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 has put the apex body in hot waters as they missed the contractual deadline (for schedule announcement), with major financial repercussions looming. With the Indian Cricket Board deciding against sending its team across the border for the eight-team tournament, the ICC is trying to convince the host board (PCB) to accept the hybrid model in the upcoming emergency meet. Per the Champions Trophy 2025 contractual commitment, the ICC should have released the final dates and schedule of this tournament 90 days before it begins, which is February 19, 2025; since they have missed the deadline, with the final announcement expected anytime next week, the delay seems to have affected the broadcasters, all stakeholders and business partners, piling pressure on ICC. ALSO READ: CT 2025: 'Once Jay Shah takes charge as ICC chairman...', PCB chief says 'will do what's best for Pak cricket' On the other hand, the PCB has also expressed displeasure over ICC taking longer to solve this issue. Per a report in Cricbuzz, a senior PCB official has approached ICC CEO Geoff Allardice seeking answers to what the future holds, with the chances of them staging the tournament in Pakistan hanging by a thin thread. Changes troubling ICC Meanwhile, the ICC proposed a hybrid model to the PCB, suggesting Pakistan could play its matches in their country, while an alternative venue, not chosen yet, will host all India matches, including the semis or final, should India qualify. In another scenario, should the PCB decide to accept it but with a condition that India and Pakistan will be placed in separate groups for Pakistan to play all league matches at home, the broadcasters are against this very idea, which affects their numbers and fan engagement, with monetary loss adding salt to the injury. The ICC is staging an emergency meeting with the BCCI and PCB spokesperson on November 29, trying to bring everyone on the same page. However, should things fall in place and Pakistan reluctantly accept the new hybrid model, where they will only travel to an alternative venue to face India and play all their remaining group matches and the semis at home, the apex body could announce the final schedule quickly. But if the PCB rejects the hybrid model and boycotts the tournament in response to BCCI’s travel stance, the tournament could be held elsewhere, with another team replacing Pakistan. In the final case scenario, the unlikeliest of them all, the tournament could get cancelled or postponed indefinitely. However, there would be severe and inevitable fallouts should any of the mentioned scenarios be adopted. Pakistan could threaten to boycott all ICC events in India in the upcoming FTP, including the 2025 Women's ODI World Cup, 2025 Men's Asia Cup, 2026 Men's T20 World Cup (with Sri Lanka), 2029 Men's Champions Trophy and the 2031 ODI World Cup (with Bangladesh). Besides, there would be separate repercussions for any team boycotting an ICC event. (With inputs from agencies)

Financial repercussions loom as ICC miss Champions Trophy 2025 contractual deadline date

The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has submitted a request for an arrest warrant against Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, Myanmar’s Commander-in-Chief and Acting President. The application accuses him of crimes against humanity, including involvement in the systematic persecution and targeting of the Rohingya population. Watch to know more!

Myanmar: ICC Prosecutor Seeks Arrest Warrant For Myanmar’s Military Leader | World News | WION

The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) recommended judges Wednesday (Nov. 27) to issue an arrest warrant for Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, the head of Myanmar’s military regime.

Hlaing is accused of committing crimes against Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslim minority since he overthrew the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup.

"After an extensive, independent and impartial investigation, my office has concluded that there are reasonable grounds to believe that senior general and acting president Min Aung Hlaing ... bears criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity," the top prosecutor, Karim Khan, said in a statement.

He added that the atrocities against Rohingya community were carried out with the help of armed forces, the Tatmadaw, and national and border police "as well as non-Rohingya citizens".

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwjWpZPgvPyJAxWVr1YBHXpVIQgQxfQBKAB6BAgUEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/thousands-of-rohingyas-enter-bangladesh-amid-fresh-influx-of-refugees-755745" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/thousands-of-rohingyas-enter-bangladesh-amid-fresh-influx-of-refugees-755745&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjWpZPgvPyJAxWVr1YBHXpVIQgQxfQBKAB6BAgUEAE">Thousands of Rohingyas enter Bangladesh amid fresh influx of refugees</a>

The probe into the violence against the Rohingya community was launched in 2019 following the&nbsp;massive displacement of over 750,000 people from the restive Rakhine state in 2016 and 2017. Over a million people now call Bangladesh’s Cox's Bazaar their home, who accuse the Myanmar military of mass killings and rapes.

Karim Khan said he would ask for more warrants for people involved in the actions carried out with "genocidal intent".

"In doing so, we will be demonstrating, together with all of our partners, that the Rohingya have not been forgotten. That they, like all people around the world, are entitled to the protection of the law," he added.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwjWpZPgvPyJAxWVr1YBHXpVIQgQxfQBKAB6BAgXEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/rohingyas-have-no-fundamental-right-to-reside-and-settle-in-india-government-tells-supreme-court-702216" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/rohingyas-have-no-fundamental-right-to-reside-and-settle-in-india-government-tells-supreme-court-702216&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjWpZPgvPyJAxWVr1YBHXpVIQgQxfQBKAB6BAgXEAE">Rohingyas have no fundamental right to reside and settle in India, India&nbsp;tells Supreme Court</a>

Following the recommendation, a panel of three judges will now see if there are “reasonable grounds” for issuing the arrest warrant. The decision is expected within next three months.

It is to be noted that Myanmar is not a member of the ICC treaty, meaning that the country won’t have any legal obligation to act against Hlaing even if an arrest warrant is issued.

(With inputs from agencies)

The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) recommended judges Wednesday (Nov. 27) to issue an arrest warrant for Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, the head of Myanmar’s military regime.

The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) recommended judges Wednesday (Nov. 27) to issue an arrest warrant for Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, the head of Myanmar’s military regime. Hlaing is accused of committing crimes against Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslim minority since he overthrew the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup. "After an extensive, independent and impartial investigation, my office has concluded that there are reasonable grounds to believe that senior general and acting president Min Aung Hlaing ... bears criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity," the top prosecutor, Karim Khan, said in a statement. He added that the atrocities against Rohingya community were carried out with the help of armed forces, the Tatmadaw, and national and border police "as well as non-Rohingya citizens". Also read: Thousands of Rohingyas enter Bangladesh amid fresh influx of refugees The probe into the violence against the Rohingya community was launched in 2019 following the massive displacement of over 750,000 people from the restive Rakhine state in 2016 and 2017. Over a million people now call Bangladesh’s Cox's Bazaar their home, who accuse the Myanmar military of mass killings and rapes. Karim Khan said he would ask for more warrants for people involved in the actions carried out with "genocidal intent". "In doing so, we will be demonstrating, together with all of our partners, that the Rohingya have not been forgotten. That they, like all people around the world, are entitled to the protection of the law," he added. Also read: Rohingyas have no fundamental right to reside and settle in India, India tells Supreme Court Following the recommendation, a panel of three judges will now see if there are “reasonable grounds” for issuing the arrest warrant. The decision is expected within next three months. It is to be noted that Myanmar is not a member of the ICC treaty, meaning that the country won’t have any legal obligation to act against Hlaing even if an arrest warrant is issued. (With inputs from agencies)

Prosecutor seeks ICC arrest warrant for Myanmar junta leader over Rohingya conflict

The United States has rejected the International Criminal Court's decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. Watch this report for more details!

ICC Arrest Warrant Against Netanyahu Divides World

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has officially issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif for allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity. These arrest warrants do not ensure that the individuals will face trial in The Hague, the Dutch city where the ICC is headquartered. Additionally, they do not guarantee that any of the men will actually be apprehended, although some nations have stated their intention to honor the warrants.

Netanyahu Faces Arrest in 124 Countries After ICC Decision; What Next? | GRAVITAS

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has called for an emergency meeting with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) on the future of the Champions Trophy. According to reports, ICC will try to resolve the scheduling issues of the CT with India refusing to travel to Pakistan. The Champions Trophy 2025 is set to be hosted by Pakistan from February 19 to March 9, but clouds of uncertainty linger after BCCI refused to travel to Pakistan.

<h2>ICC to hold meeting with BCCI, PCB</h2>

According to reports from Sports Tak, ICC will meet with representatives of BCCI and PCB on Tuesday (Nov 26) which will focus on convincing either board to stage the Champions Trophy in a smooth manner. ICC will first focus on convincing BCCI to travel to Pakistan, however, if India are reluctant they will look to convince the hosts to move into a hybrid model.

<h2>Champions Trophy to be held in hybrid model?</h2>

As things stand, with less than three months to go for the Champions Trophy to start, Pakistan is not yet confident of hosting the entire tournament with the Indian team reluctant to travel. Pakistan’s proposal to host India’s matches including the final has been rejected by the BCCI, leaving ICC with three options.

Like 2008, the Champions Trophy could be postponed until a solution is met as the ICC could explore the idea. On the other hand, India’s reluctance to travel could force them out of the tournament if they are forfeited. However, that option looks unlikely due to India’s brand value in cricket and Jay Shah set to become the chairperson of the board of directors of ICC.

The hybrid model remains the best option and likely option to host the Champions Trophy with India’s matches to take place outside Pakistan while the rest of the seven teams play in the nation.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has called for an emergency meeting with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) on the future of the Champions Trophy.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has called for an emergency meeting with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) on the future of the Champions Trophy. According to reports, ICC will try to resolve the scheduling issues of the CT with India refusing to travel to Pakistan. The Champions Trophy 2025 is set to be hosted by Pakistan from February 19 to March 9, but clouds of uncertainty linger after BCCI refused to travel to Pakistan. ICC to hold meeting with BCCI, PCB According to reports from Sports Tak, ICC will meet with representatives of BCCI and PCB on Tuesday (Nov 26) which will focus on convincing either board to stage the Champions Trophy in a smooth manner. ICC will first focus on convincing BCCI to travel to Pakistan, however, if India are reluctant they will look to convince the hosts to move into a hybrid model. Champions Trophy to be held in hybrid model? As things stand, with less than three months to go for the Champions Trophy to start, Pakistan is not yet confident of hosting the entire tournament with the Indian team reluctant to travel. Pakistan’s proposal to host India’s matches including the final has been rejected by the BCCI, leaving ICC with three options. Like 2008, the Champions Trophy could be postponed until a solution is met as the ICC could explore the idea. On the other hand, India’s reluctance to travel could force them out of the tournament if they are forfeited. However, that option looks unlikely due to India’s brand value in cricket and Jay Shah set to become the chairperson of the board of directors of ICC. The hybrid model remains the best option and likely option to host the Champions Trophy with India’s matches to take place outside Pakistan while the rest of the seven teams play in the nation.

Champions Trophy 2025: ICC calls for emergency meeting with BCCI, PCB over scheduling issues - Report

World leaders respond to Netanyahu's ICC arrest warrant, following his condemnation of the charges as politically motivated.

Netanyahu's ICC Warrant: World Leaders Take Cognizance Of Bibi's Arrest Warrant

Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant as anti-Semitic, rejecting its legitimacy.

Benjamin Netanyahu Slams ICC Warrant As Anti-Semitic

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on Thursday (Nov. 21), for crimes against humanity and war crimes, as the West Asia crisis continues.&nbsp;

It further classified the arrest warrants as “secret” to safeguard the conduct of the investigations.&nbsp;

“The Chamber issued warrants of arrest for two individuals, Mr Benjamin Netanyahu and Mr Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024, the day the Prosecution filed the applications for warrants of arrest,” the ICC stated in its statement.&nbsp;

The statement read that the chamber found “reasonable grounds” to believe that Netanyahu and Gallant, at the time of the alleged conduct, each bear criminal responsibility for the following crimes as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/icc-to-probe-alleged-war-crimes-in-palestinian-territories-269444">Also read:&nbsp;US Congress invites Israeli PM Netanyahu to speak amid ICC warrant controversy and Gaza crisis</a>

“The Chamber also found reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant each bear criminal responsibility as civilian superiors for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population,” it added.&nbsp;

The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas leader Mohammed Diab Ibrahim Al-Masri (also known as Mohammed Deif).

The court “unanimously” decided to issue an arrest warrant for Hamas’s military commander Mohammed al-Masri “for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes committed on the territory of the State of Israel and the State of Palestine from at least 7 October 2023”.

It further accused him of crims including murder, torture, rape and other forms of sexual violence.&nbsp;

Israel, however, has claimed to have killed Deif in an air raid in southern Gaza in July. But the ICC decided to proceed with the warrant, saying it was “not in a position to determine whether [he] has been killed or remains alive”.

<h2>'Antisemitic decision'</h2>

Following this, the Prime Minister’s office declared in a statement on Thursday that the ICC’s “antisemitic decision” to issue arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant “is equivalent to a modern Dreyfus trial.”

The PMO vowed that the court’s decision would not deter Israel from protecting its citizens, adding that it rejected “with disgust” the court’s “false” and “absurd” charges — and asserted that they stem from Khan’s efforts to “save his skin from the serious charges against him for sexual harassment” as well as the beliefs of “biased judges motivated by antisemitic hatred of Israel.”

“That is why the prosecutor lied when he told American senators that he would not act against Israel before he got here and heard its side. That is why he suddenly canceled his arrival in Israel last May, a few days after suspicions were raised against him for sexual harassment, and announced his intention to issue arrest warrants against the prime minister and former defense minister,” the PMO charged.

Disclaimer: WION takes the utmost care to accurately and responsibly report conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, Syria, Iraq, and non-state actors like the Islamic State, among others. In this context, claims and counterclaims are being made online and offline. WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

(With inputs from agencies)

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on Thursday (Nov.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on Thursday (Nov. 21), for crimes against humanity and war crimes, as the West Asia crisis continues. It further classified the arrest warrants as “secret” to safeguard the conduct of the investigations. “The Chamber issued warrants of arrest for two individuals, Mr Benjamin Netanyahu and Mr Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024, the day the Prosecution filed the applications for warrants of arrest,” the ICC stated in its statement. The statement read that the chamber found “reasonable grounds” to believe that Netanyahu and Gallant, at the time of the alleged conduct, each bear criminal responsibility for the following crimes as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts. Also read: US Congress invites Israeli PM Netanyahu to speak amid ICC warrant controversy and Gaza crisis “The Chamber also found reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant each bear criminal responsibility as civilian superiors for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population,” it added. The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas leader Mohammed Diab Ibrahim Al-Masri (also known as Mohammed Deif). The court “unanimously” decided to issue an arrest warrant for Hamas’s military commander Mohammed al-Masri “for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes committed on the territory of the State of Israel and the State of Palestine from at least 7 October 2023”. It further accused him of crims including murder, torture, rape and other forms of sexual violence. Israel, however, has claimed to have killed Deif in an air raid in southern Gaza in July. But the ICC decided to proceed with the warrant, saying it was “not in a position to determine whether [he] has been killed or remains alive”. 'Antisemitic decision' Following this, the Prime Minister’s office declared in a statement on Thursday that the ICC’s “antisemitic decision” to issue arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant “is equivalent to a modern Dreyfus trial.” The PMO vowed that the court’s decision would not deter Israel from protecting its citizens, adding that it rejected “with disgust” the court’s “false” and “absurd” charges — and asserted that they stem from Khan’s efforts to “save his skin from the serious charges against him for sexual harassment” as well as the beliefs of “biased judges motivated by antisemitic hatred of Israel.” “That is why the prosecutor lied when he told American senators that he would not act against Israel before he got here and heard its side. That is why he suddenly canceled his arrival in Israel last May, a few days after suspicions were raised against him for sexual harassment, and announced his intention to issue arrest warrants against the prime minister and former defense minister,” the PMO charged. Disclaimer: WION takes the utmost care to accurately and responsibly report conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, Syria, Iraq, and non-state actors like the Islamic State, among others. In this context, claims and counterclaims are being made online and offline. WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos. (With inputs from agencies)

ICC issues arrest warrants against Israeli PM Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas leader over war crimes

The United States "fundamentally rejects" a decision by the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, the White House said Thursday.

The United States "fundamentally rejects" a decision by the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, the White House said Thursday. "We remain deeply concerned by the Prosecutor's rush to seek arrest warrants and the troubling process errors that led to this decision. The United States has been clear that the ICC does not have jurisdiction over this matter," a National Security Council spokesperson said. The statement made no mention of an ICC arrest warrant also issued for Mohammed Deif, the military chief of Hamas. Mike Waltz, the incoming national security advisor under US President-elect Donald Trump's administration, defended Israel and promised a "strong response to the antisemitic bias of the ICC & UN come January." Also read: ICC issues arrest warrants against Israeli PM Netanyahu, Gallant and Hamas leader over war crimes "The ICC has no credibility and these allegations have been refuted by the US government," Waltz said on X. His comments reflected a wider outrage among Republicans, with some calling for the US Senate to sanction the ICC, which counts 124 national members who are in theory obliged to arrest individuals subject to warrants. Neither the United States nor Israel is a member of the ICC and both have rejected its jurisdiction. Watch | ICC Issues Arrest Warrant Against Israeli PM Netanyahu and Gallant × The Hague-based court said Thursday that the warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant were issued "for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024." A warrant was also issued for Deif, whom Israel claimed was killed in an air strike in Gaza in July, but Hamas has not confirmed his death. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

US ‘fundamentally rejects’ ICC’s arrest warrant for Netanyahu, says court has no credibility

Icc, News on Icc, stories on Icc, articles on Icc, Icc stories at Wion, Icc news, Icc latest news