US President Donald Trump on Monday (Oct 13) praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his role in ending the two-year Gaza war, but couldn’t resist including a few jabs in his speech to the Israeli Parliament, Knesset. Trump hailed the agreement as “a historic dawn of a new Middle East” while speaking to Israeli lawmakers after the groundbreaking announcement of a ceasefire and hostage exchange deal between Israel and Hamas, after two years of war.<h2>Trump roasts Netanyahu</h2>Trump, in his usual style, spent most of his speech reading prepared remarks, but couldn't resist going off script and ended up trolling Netanyahu. &nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/ex-journalist-pete-hegseth-mocks-press-as-us-media-revolts-against-pentagon-s-gag-order-press-no-longer-roams-free-1760402303105">Ex-journalist Pete Hegseth mocks press as US media revolts against Pentagon’s gag order: ‘Press no longer roams free’</a>“I want to express my gratitude to a man of exceptional courage and patriotism, whose partnership did so much to make this momentous day possible,” Trump said. “You know who I’m talking about, there’s only one, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” he said, urging the leader popularly known as Bibi to stand and accept applause.But then the US president quickly went off-script. “And he is not easy,” Trump joked, adding, “I want to tell you, he’s not the easiest guy to deal with.”“But that’s what makes him great,” added Trump almost in hindsight, before quipping that Netanyahu could “be a little nicer because you’re not at war anymore.”The comments appeared to reflect frustrations reportedly growing inside the White House over Netanyahu’s conduct during the Gaza war — including a surprise Israeli strike on Qatar, a key US ally.In one of the more striking moments, Trump told the Knesset: “Bibi, you’re going to be remembered for this far more than if you kept this thing going, going, going, kill, kill, kill.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mi5-issues-chilling-warning-to-uk-mps-china-russia-iran-spies-trying-to-erode-the-foundations-of-our-sovereignty-1760406481007">MI5 issues chilling warning to UK MPs: China, Russia, Iran spies trying to 'erode the foundations of our sovereignty'</a>He also poked fun at Netanyahu’s lengthy speech before him, saying he had been kept “quite late” by the prime minister’s “brilliant but very long remarks.”“I thought I was going to run up here, make a speech, and then head to Egypt,” Trump said, referring to the Gaza peace summit in Sharm el-Sheikh, attended by more than 20 world leaders.<h2>Trump demands a pardon for close ally Bibi</h2>However, not all of Trump's comments were digs. He also called on Israeli President Isaac Herzog to pardon Netanyahu over his ongoing corruption and bribery cases.“Hey, I have an idea, Mr President, why don’t you give him a pardon? Give him a pardon, come on” Trump said. “This has been one of the greatest wartime presidents, and cigars and champagne, who the hell cares about that?”. Netanyahu faces a criminal case that involves allegations that he accepted gifts, including expensive cigars and champagne, in exchange for political favours.

Trump praised Netanyahu for ending the Gaza war during his Knesset speech, but couldn’t resist roasting him. He joked Bibi “isn’t easy” and could “be a little nicer now,” while also urging Israel’s president to pardon Netanyahu over corruption cases.

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Oct 13) praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his role in ending the two-year Gaza war, but couldn’t resist including a few jabs in his speech to the Israeli Parliament, Knesset. Trump hailed the agreement as “a historic dawn of a new Middle East” while speaking to Israeli lawmakers after the groundbreaking announcement of a ceasefire and hostage exchange deal between Israel and Hamas, after two years of war. Trump roasts Netanyahu Trump, in his usual style, spent most of his speech reading prepared remarks, but couldn't resist going off script and ended up trolling Netanyahu. Also read | Ex-journalist Pete Hegseth mocks press as US media revolts against Pentagon’s gag order: ‘Press no longer roams free’ “I want to express my gratitude to a man of exceptional courage and patriotism, whose partnership did so much to make this momentous day possible,” Trump said. “You know who I’m talking about, there’s only one, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” he said, urging the leader popularly known as Bibi to stand and accept applause. But then the US president quickly went off-script. “And he is not easy,” Trump joked, adding, “I want to tell you, he’s not the easiest guy to deal with.” “But that’s what makes him great,” added Trump almost in hindsight, before quipping that Netanyahu could “be a little nicer because you’re not at war anymore.” The comments appeared to reflect frustrations reportedly growing inside the White House over Netanyahu’s conduct during the Gaza war — including a surprise Israeli strike on Qatar, a key US ally. In one of the more striking moments, Trump told the Knesset: “Bibi, you’re going to be remembered for this far more than if you kept this thing going, going, going, kill, kill, kill.” Also read | MI5 issues chilling warning to UK MPs: China, Russia, Iran spies trying to 'erode the foundations of our sovereignty' He also poked fun at Netanyahu’s lengthy speech before him, saying he had been kept “quite late” by the prime minister’s “brilliant but very long remarks.” “I thought I was going to run up here, make a speech, and then head to Egypt,” Trump said, referring to the Gaza peace summit in Sharm el-Sheikh, attended by more than 20 world leaders. Trump demands a pardon for close ally Bibi However, not all of Trump's comments were digs. He also called on Israeli President Isaac Herzog to pardon Netanyahu over his ongoing corruption and bribery cases. “Hey, I have an idea, Mr President, why don’t you give him a pardon? Give him a pardon, come on” Trump said. “This has been one of the greatest wartime presidents, and cigars and champagne, who the hell cares about that?”. Netanyahu faces a criminal case that involves allegations that he accepted gifts, including expensive cigars and champagne, in exchange for political favours.

Trump praised Netanyahu for ending the Gaza war during his Knesset speech, but couldn’t resist roasting him. He joked Bibi “isn’t easy” and could “be a little nicer now,” while also urging Israel’s president to pardon Netanyahu over corruption cases.

Could 'be a little nicer': Trump hails Netanyahu as ‘hero’ of Gaza ceasefire — then roasts him about…

Donald Trump calls for a new era of harmony in West Asia following the landmark Gaza peace deal. He emphasizes the opportunity for rebuilding and lasting peace between Israel and Hamas.


Donald Trump Calls for New Era of Harmony in West Asia; Says Gaza Deal Opens Door to 'Rebuilding' 

Several major US news organisations have refused to sign a new Pentagon policy that limits journalists’ access to defense facilities and requires them to pledge not to obtain “unauthorised” information - aka not pursue investigative journalism. The Defense Department, led by Secretary Pete Hegseth, has given reporters until Tuesday (Oct 14) 5pm to sign the pledge or turn in their press credentials within 24 hours. The policy also bars journalists from entering certain areas without official escorts.<h2>US media refuses to bow down</h2>The Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, the Atlantic, the Guardian, and Breaking Defense said Monday they would not comply. The outlets called the move unconstitutional and an attack on press freedom.Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray, in a statement, said the policy “undercuts First Amendment protections by placing unnecessary constraints on gathering and publishing information. We will continue to vigorously and fairly report on the policies and positions of the Pentagon and officials across the government.”The Atlantic said it “fundamentally” opposes the restrictions. The New York Times added that the public “has a right to know how the government and military are operating,” noting that the US military is "funded by nearly $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars annually".<h2>Pete Hegseth mocks press</h2>Hegseth, a former Fox News host, responded on X with a hand waving goodbye emoji and a post mocking critics with a list of what he called “Press Credentialing FOR DUMMIES,” and saying that "Press no longer roams free; Press must wear visible badge; Credentialed press no longer permitted to solicit criminal acts".&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Pentagon access is a privilege, not a right. So, here is <a href="https://twitter.com/DeptofWar?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DeptofWar</a> press credentialing FOR DUMMIES: ✅ Press no longer roams free ✅ Press must wear visible badge ✅ Credentialed press no longer permitted to solicit criminal acts DONE. Pentagon now has same rules as every…&mdash; Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) <a href="https://twitter.com/PeteHegseth/status/1977828217315549301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 13, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He later reposted a cartoon showing the Atlantic as a crying baby.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Yes <a href="https://t.co/HCQSGscUua">https://t.co/HCQSGscUua</a>&mdash; Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) <a href="https://twitter.com/PeteHegseth/status/1977813700393513464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 13, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Even some right-leaning outlets balked at the prospect of signing the letter. Newsmax told the Times it “has no plans to sign the letter,” calling the rules “unnecessary and onerous.” But One America News, a staunchly pro-Trump network, accepted the terms. Host and former congressman Matt Gaetz said the outlet was “happy to follow these reasonable conditions.”<h2>Just journalists having a meltdown?</h2>Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said the backlash was exaggerated, claiming the policy only requires journalists to acknowledge its terms, not agree to them. He accused reporters of having a “full-blown meltdown” and insisted the rules are “what’s best for our troops and the national security of this country.”The Pentagon Press Association, which represents defense reporters, slamming the policy said it appears to be “designed to stifle a free press and potentially expose us to prosecution for simply doing our jobs”. It sends an unprecedented message of intimidation,” the group said, “unprecedented message of intimidation to everyone within the DoD, warning against any unapproved interactions with the press and even suggesting it’s criminal to speak without express permission – which plainly, it is not”.

Pentagon’s new media policy sparks newsroom revolt: Major US news organisations have refused to sign a new Pentagon policy restricting reporters’ access. To this, Pete Hegseth, a former journalist, has responded with mockery. All you need to know.

Several major US news organisations have refused to sign a new Pentagon policy that limits journalists’ access to defense facilities and requires them to pledge not to obtain “unauthorised” information - aka not pursue investigative journalism. The Defense Department, led by Secretary Pete Hegseth, has given reporters until Tuesday (Oct 14) 5pm to sign the pledge or turn in their press credentials within 24 hours. The policy also bars journalists from entering certain areas without official escorts. US media refuses to bow down The Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, the Atlantic, the Guardian, and Breaking Defense said Monday they would not comply. The outlets called the move unconstitutional and an attack on press freedom. Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray, in a statement, said the policy “undercuts First Amendment protections by placing unnecessary constraints on gathering and publishing information. We will continue to vigorously and fairly report on the policies and positions of the Pentagon and officials across the government.” The Atlantic said it “fundamentally” opposes the restrictions. The New York Times added that the public “has a right to know how the government and military are operating,” noting that the US military is "funded by nearly $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars annually". Pete Hegseth mocks press Hegseth, a former Fox News host, responded on X with a hand waving goodbye emoji and a post mocking critics with a list of what he called “Press Credentialing FOR DUMMIES,” and saying that "Press no longer roams free; Press must wear visible badge; Credentialed press no longer permitted to solicit criminal acts".

Pentagon’s new media policy sparks newsroom revolt: Major US news organisations have refused to sign a new Pentagon policy restricting reporters’ access. To this, Pete Hegseth, a former journalist, has responded with mockery. All you need to know.

Ex-journalist Pete Hegseth mocks press as US media revolts against Pentagon’s gag order: ‘Press no longer roams free’

Two leaders were removed from the Israeli parliament house for interrupting President Donald Trump’s speech to the Knesset on Monday. The lawmakers, identified as Ayman Odeh and Ofer Cassif, displayed a poster reading ‘recognise Palestine’ amid the speech. Reports suggest that signs reading ‘genocide’ were also displayed during the speech.&nbsp;In response to the brief interruption, US President Donald Trump said, "That was efficient." The incident unfolded while Donald Trump was in Israel addressing the parliament house amid the release of Israeli hostages by Palestinian militant outfit Hamas, and a breakthrough came with the two-year-long Gaza war coming to a halt.<h3>Who is Ayman Odeh?</h3>Born in 1975 in Haifa’s Kababir neighbourhood, Israel, Ayman Odeh comes from a modest background, and his father was a construction worker. Though his family largely followed the Ahmadiyya faith, his Sunni Muslim parents enrolled him in a Christian school, where he excelled academically. Over time, Odeh described himself as an atheist, saying he had “transcended the confines of religion and ethnicity.”&nbsp;He pursued law at the University of Craiova in Romania between 1993 and 1997, where he actively participated in pro-Palestinian movements and developed a deep interest in political thought. After earning his Bachelor of Laws degree, he qualified to practise law in Israel in 2001. Odeh met his wife, gynaecologist Nardine Aseli, in 2000, and they married five years later. The couple has three children.&nbsp;Political journey of Ayman Odeh&nbsp;Odeh began his political journey with the Hadash party, serving on the Haifa City Council from 1998 to 2005 and later becoming the party’s secretary-general. After Hadash leader Mohammed Barakeh stepped down, Odeh took over leadership in 2015. That year, he played a key role in forming the Joint List, an alliance of major Arab parties, and led it to significant success in the Knesset elections. Analysts praised his pragmatic and inclusive approach, which helped reshape Arab political representation in Israel.&nbsp;Odeh has championed social reforms, focusing on women’s employment, infrastructure development, and reducing violence in Arab communities. He supports Jewish self-determination while advocating the same right for Palestinians. Known for his calm, cooperative tone, he often cites Martin Luther King Jr. as an influence.&nbsp;In recent years, Odeh faced political backlash for comments following the 2023 Gaza war ceasefire, including a statement that “Gaza has won.” Though a petition was filed to expel him from the Knesset in 2025, it ultimately failed to meet the required vote threshold.<h3>Who is Ofer Cassif?</h3>Ofer Cassif, a left-wing Israeli politician from the Arab-majority Hadash-Ta’al party, has long been known for his outrageous and dissenting views. Born in Rishon LeZion near Tel Aviv on December 25, 1964, Cassif earned a doctorate in political philosophy from the London School of Economics and later served as an academic at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.&nbsp;&nbsp;He has been a member of the Israeli Knesset for nearly five years, representing Hadash, the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality. Cassif’s defiance of mainstream Israeli politics dates back decades. In the late 1980s, he served jail time for refusing to perform military service in the occupied Palestinian territories, reflecting his pro-Palestinian and communist stance. In 2021, he alleged that police assaulted him during a protest against an illegal Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem.&nbsp;Before entering parliament, Cassif made headlines for his fierce criticism of Israeli leaders—once calling then-Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked “neo-Nazi scum.” Though the Central Elections Committee initially barred him from running in the 2019 elections, the Supreme Court overturned the decision, allowing his election to the Knesset as Hadash-Ta’al secured around 4.5 per cent of the vote and six seats.&nbsp;Cassif has continued to challenge Israeli government policies, particularly regarding the occupation of Palestinian territories. Following the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, he described the Israeli government as “fascist” and accused it of ethnic cleansing and pogroms against Palestinians. These remarks led to a 45-day suspension from the Knesset, which he condemned as a blow to political freedom.&nbsp;In 2024, Cassif faced another six-month suspension for signing a petition urging the International Court of Justice to indict Israel and for labelling Palestinians fighting Israeli forces as “freedom fighters.” In July 2025, he was again suspended for two months, marking yet another clash between his political activism and parliamentary discipline. &nbsp;

The incident unfolded while Donald Trump was in Israel addressing the parliament house amid the release of Israeli hostages by Palestinian militant outfit Hamas, and a breakthrough came with the two-year-long Gaza war coming to a halt.

Two leaders were removed from the Israeli parliament house for interrupting President Donald Trump’s speech to the Knesset on Monday. The lawmakers, identified as Ayman Odeh and Ofer Cassif, displayed a poster reading ‘recognise Palestine’ amid the speech. Reports suggest that signs reading ‘genocide’ were also displayed during the speech. In response to the brief interruption, US President Donald Trump said, "That was efficient." The incident unfolded while Donald Trump was in Israel addressing the parliament house amid the release of Israeli hostages by Palestinian militant outfit Hamas, and a breakthrough came with the two-year-long Gaza war coming to a halt. Who is Ayman Odeh? Born in 1975 in Haifa’s Kababir neighbourhood, Israel, Ayman Odeh comes from a modest background, and his father was a construction worker. Though his family largely followed the Ahmadiyya faith, his Sunni Muslim parents enrolled him in a Christian school, where he excelled academically. Over time, Odeh described himself as an atheist, saying he had “transcended the confines of religion and ethnicity.” He pursued law at the University of Craiova in Romania between 1993 and 1997, where he actively participated in pro-Palestinian movements and developed a deep interest in political thought. After earning his Bachelor of Laws degree, he qualified to practise law in Israel in 2001. Odeh met his wife, gynaecologist Nardine Aseli, in 2000, and they married five years later. The couple has three children. Political journey of Ayman Odeh Odeh began his political journey with the Hadash party, serving on the Haifa City Council from 1998 to 2005 and later becoming the party’s secretary-general. After Hadash leader Mohammed Barakeh stepped down, Odeh took over leadership in 2015. That year, he played a key role in forming the Joint List, an alliance of major Arab parties, and led it to significant success in the Knesset elections. Analysts praised his pragmatic and inclusive approach, which helped reshape Arab political representation in Israel. Odeh has championed social reforms, focusing on women’s employment, infrastructure development, and reducing violence in Arab communities. He supports Jewish self-determination while advocating the same right for Palestinians. Known for his calm, cooperative tone, he often cites Martin Luther King Jr. as an influence. In recent years, Odeh faced political backlash for comments following the 2023 Gaza war ceasefire, including a statement that “Gaza has won.” Though a petition was filed to expel him from the Knesset in 2025, it ultimately failed to meet the required vote threshold. Who is Ofer Cassif? Ofer Cassif, a left-wing Israeli politician from the Arab-majority Hadash-Ta’al party, has long been known for his outrageous and dissenting views. Born in Rishon LeZion near Tel Aviv on December 25, 1964, Cassif earned a doctorate in political philosophy from the London School of Economics and later served as an academic at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He has been a member of the Israeli Knesset for nearly five years, representing Hadash, the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality. Cassif’s defiance of mainstream Israeli politics dates back decades. In the late 1980s, he served jail time for refusing to perform military service in the occupied Palestinian territories, reflecting his pro-Palestinian and communist stance. In 2021, he alleged that police assaulted him during a protest against an illegal Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem. Before entering parliament, Cassif made headlines for his fierce criticism of Israeli leaders—once calling then-Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked “neo-Nazi scum.” Though the Central Elections Committee initially barred him from running in the 2019 elections, the Supreme Court overturned the decision, allowing his election to the Knesset as Hadash-Ta’al secured around 4.5 per cent of the vote and six seats. Cassif has continued to challenge Israeli government policies, particularly regarding the occupation of Palestinian territories. Following the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, he described the Israeli government as “fascist” and accused it of ethnic cleansing and pogroms against Palestinians. These remarks led to a 45-day suspension from the Knesset, which he condemned as a blow to political freedom. In 2024, Cassif faced another six-month suspension for signing a petition urging the International Court of Justice to indict Israel and for labelling Palestinians fighting Israeli forces as “freedom fighters.” In July 2025, he was again suspended for two months, marking yet another clash between his political activism and parliamentary discipline.

The incident unfolded while Donald Trump was in Israel addressing the parliament house amid the release of Israeli hostages by Palestinian militant outfit Hamas, and a breakthrough came with the two-year-long Gaza war coming to a halt.

Who are Ayman Odeh and Ofer Cassif? Two Israeli MPs removed from parliament for disrupting Trump’s speech

In a speech to the Israeli Knesset on Monday (October 13), Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lavished praise on US President Donald Trump, calling him ‘the greatest friend that the Israel has ever had in the White House’. “No American president has ever done more for Israel, and as I said in Washington, it isn’t even close,” Netanyahu said, underscoring the significant impact Trump had on Israel’s diplomatic and security landscape.&nbsp;Netanyahu specifically highlighted Trump’s contributions, including his decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital during his first term, a move that was met with widespread praise in Israel but condemned by much of the international community. He also lauded Trump for brokered the Abraham Accords, agreements that led to the normalisation of diplomatic ties between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-gambling-with-war-eu-warns-russian-president-putin-against-airspace-violations-1760351432401">'Gambling with war': EU warns Russian President Putin against airspace violations</a>&nbsp;The Israeli leader further commended Trump for supporting Israel’s rights in the occupied West Bank and for recognising Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, territory captured from Syria during the Six-Day War in 1967 and later annexed — a decision that has not been recognised by much of the global community. Netanyahu also spoke about Trump’s role in advancing peace efforts in the region. He expressed optimism about Trump’s Gaza peace proposal, calling it a significant step toward “historic expansion of peace”. Netanyahu reiterated his commitment to achieving peace with the Palestinians and the wider Middle East, emphasising the importance of collaboration to reach lasting solutions.&nbsp;The prime minister also took a moment to honour the memory of Israeli soldiers who have lost their lives in service to the country. “We owe everything to those who made the ultimate sacrifice,” he said before shifting focus to Trump’s involvement in recent hostage negotiations.<h2>Trump’s role in ceasefire and hostage exchange</h2>In a heartfelt portion of his address, Netanyahu thanked Trump for his crucial role in securing a ceasefire agreement that facilitated the return of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. "Trump’s decisive intervention was instrumental in bringing our hostages home,” Netanyahu said, expressing gratitude on behalf of the entire nation. “We know what your important part has been. It will be engraved in our history — and in the history of humankind.”&nbsp;Netanyahu’s praise for Trump marks the continuation of a close and warm relationship between the two leaders during Trump’s presidency. In recent weeks, as hostilities in Gaza have escalated, Netanyahu has acknowledged Trump’s key role in the negotiations that ultimately led to the exchange. While Netanyahu’s remarks underscored Trump’s deep influence on Israel’s security and diplomatic efforts, the prime minister’s focus on peace and the future highlighted the ongoing challenges Israel faces in its relationship with the Palestinians and the broader Middle East.

Netanyahu: ‘Donald Trump is the greatest friend that Israel has ever had in White House’

In a speech to the Israeli Knesset on Monday (October 13), Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lavished praise on US President Donald Trump, calling him ‘the greatest friend that the Israel has ever had in the White House’. “No American president has ever done more for Israel, and as I said in Washington, it isn’t even close,” Netanyahu said, underscoring the significant impact Trump had on Israel’s diplomatic and security landscape. Netanyahu specifically highlighted Trump’s contributions, including his decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital during his first term, a move that was met with widespread praise in Israel but condemned by much of the international community. He also lauded Trump for brokered the Abraham Accords, agreements that led to the normalisation of diplomatic ties between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco. Also Read: 'Gambling with war': EU warns Russian President Putin against airspace violations The Israeli leader further commended Trump for supporting Israel’s rights in the occupied West Bank and for recognising Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, territory captured from Syria during the Six-Day War in 1967 and later annexed — a decision that has not been recognised by much of the global community. Netanyahu also spoke about Trump’s role in advancing peace efforts in the region. He expressed optimism about Trump’s Gaza peace proposal, calling it a significant step toward “historic expansion of peace”. Netanyahu reiterated his commitment to achieving peace with the Palestinians and the wider Middle East, emphasising the importance of collaboration to reach lasting solutions. The prime minister also took a moment to honour the memory of Israeli soldiers who have lost their lives in service to the country. “We owe everything to those who made the ultimate sacrifice,” he said before shifting focus to Trump’s involvement in recent hostage negotiations. Trump’s role in ceasefire and hostage exchange In a heartfelt portion of his address, Netanyahu thanked Trump for his crucial role in securing a ceasefire agreement that facilitated the return of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. "Trump’s decisive intervention was instrumental in bringing our hostages home,” Netanyahu said, expressing gratitude on behalf of the entire nation. “We know what your important part has been. It will be engraved in our history — and in the history of humankind.” Netanyahu’s praise for Trump marks the continuation of a close and warm relationship between the two leaders during Trump’s presidency. In recent weeks, as hostilities in Gaza have escalated, Netanyahu has acknowledged Trump’s key role in the negotiations that ultimately led to the exchange. While Netanyahu’s remarks underscored Trump’s deep influence on Israel’s security and diplomatic efforts, the prime minister’s focus on peace and the future highlighted the ongoing challenges Israel faces in its relationship with the Palestinians and the broader Middle East.

Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday (October 13) addressed the Israeli Parliament&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Oct 12) declared that the "war is over in Gaza" as he departed for a high-stakes peace mission to Israel and Egypt, calling the trip a "very special visit." Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump brushed off doubts about the ceasefire and hostage-release deal between Israel and Hamas. "The war is over. Okay? You understand that?" he insisted when asked if he was confident the conflict had ended. When pressed on whether the truce would hold, he added, "I think it's going to hold. I think people are tired of it. It's been centuries."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/hamas-to-begin-releasing-israeli-hostages-monday-ahead-of-trump-s-egypt-peace-summit-1760228718161">Hamas to begin releasing Israeli hostages Monday ahead of Trump's Egypt peace summit</a><h2>Trump says Israel-Hamas aren't "going to want to disappoint" him</h2>"Everybody’s very excited about this moment in time. This is a very special event," Trump told reporters earlier as he boarded his plane at Joint Base Andrews near Washington, accompanied by top US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.Trump said he had "verbal guarantees" from both Israel and Hamas to honour the first phase of the deal. "I don’t think they’re going to want to disappoint me," he added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/in-pics-after-almost-two-years-of-war-aid-finally-flows-into-gaza-1760251345599">In Pics: After almost two years of war, aid finally flows into Gaza</a><h2>Trump's Middle East schedule</h2>According to an AFP report, Trump, on his Middle East trip, would first visit Israel to meet the families of hostages seized by Hamas in its October 7, 2023, cross-border assault, before addressing the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem. He will then travel to Egypt to co-host a summit of more than 20 world leaders with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Sharm el-Sheikh.The summit is expected to finalise Trump’s 20-point peace plan for Gaza, which was announced in late September and led to the current ceasefire. He also revealed plans to eventually visit Gaza, saying, "I’d like to put my feet on it at least," while noting that a new governing body for the enclave would be formed “very quickly.”&nbsp;

Trump declares ‘war is over in Gaza’ as he departs for peace mission to Israel, Egypt. He says both sides gave “verbal guarantees” to uphold the ceasefire and that “they won’t want to disappoint me.” Read full story.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Oct 12) declared that the "war is over in Gaza" as he departed for a high-stakes peace mission to Israel and Egypt, calling the trip a "very special visit." Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump brushed off doubts about the ceasefire and hostage-release deal between Israel and Hamas. "The war is over. Okay? You understand that?" he insisted when asked if he was confident the conflict had ended. When pressed on whether the truce would hold, he added, "I think it's going to hold. I think people are tired of it. It's been centuries." Also read | Hamas to begin releasing Israeli hostages Monday ahead of Trump's Egypt peace summit Trump says Israel-Hamas aren't "going to want to disappoint" him "Everybody’s very excited about this moment in time. This is a very special event," Trump told reporters earlier as he boarded his plane at Joint Base Andrews near Washington, accompanied by top US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. Trump said he had "verbal guarantees" from both Israel and Hamas to honour the first phase of the deal. "I don’t think they’re going to want to disappoint me," he added. Also read | In Pics: After almost two years of war, aid finally flows into Gaza Trump's Middle East schedule According to an AFP report, Trump, on his Middle East trip, would first visit Israel to meet the families of hostages seized by Hamas in its October 7, 2023, cross-border assault, before addressing the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem. He will then travel to Egypt to co-host a summit of more than 20 world leaders with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Sharm el-Sheikh. The summit is expected to finalise Trump’s 20-point peace plan for Gaza, which was announced in late September and led to the current ceasefire. He also revealed plans to eventually visit Gaza, saying, "I’d like to put my feet on it at least," while noting that a new governing body for the enclave would be formed “very quickly.”

Trump declares ‘war is over in Gaza’ as he departs for peace mission to Israel, Egypt. He says both sides gave “verbal guarantees” to uphold the ceasefire and that “they won’t want to disappoint me.” Read full story.

Trump declares 'war is over in Gaza' ahead of peace summit in Egypt

US President Donald Trump has once again accused his predecessor, former US president Joe Biden, of secretly planting hundreds of agents in the insurrectionist crowds at the Jan 6, 2021, Capitol riot. On Truth Social, the Republican leader whose incendiary speech is believed to have led to the Capitol riots alleged that "BIDEN FBI PLACED 274 AGENTS INTO THE CROWD ON JANUARY 6". He added that this means that a "lot of very good people will be owed big apologies," while rallying his audience to "DO SOMETHING!!!".<h2>Trump AGAIN claims Biden was behind the Jan 6 violence</h2>In his Truth Social post, Trump wrote, “THE BIDEN FBI PLACED 274 AGENTS INTO THE CROWD ON JANUARY 6. If this is so, which it is, a lot of very good people will be owed big apologies. What a SCAM - DO SOMETHING!!! President DJT.”

This is not the first time Trump has claimed this. Just last month, he made a similar accusation, slammed the Jan 6 Capitol riot as a "hoax" and claimed that the "FBI had secretly placed, against all Rules, Regulations, Protocols, and Standards, 274 FBI Agents into the Crowd just prior to, and during, the January 6th Hoax". He claimed that the FBI agents were "probably acting as Agitators and Insurrectionists, but certainly not as 'Law Enforcement Officials'".Demanding information about the alleged FBI agents turned agitators' information at the time he had, in a similar fashion, claimed that "Many Great American Patriots were made to pay a very big price only for the love of their Country".<h2>Jan 6 riots and Trump indictment</h2>In August 2023, Trump was indicted on felony charges for working to overturn the results of the 2020 elections (which he lost to Biden) in the run-up to the violent riot by his supporters at the US Capitol. However, he escaped conviction as he was elected POTUS for a second term. Earlier this year, former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a much-awaited report published just days before the beginning of the Republican's second term, insisted that the charges levelled against Trump by his team would have ended in conviction had he not returned to the White House. "

Donald Trump has again accused Joe Biden of planting 274 FBI agents in the crowd during the Jan 6 Capitol riots, calling it a “scam” and urging supporters to “do something.” Read full story.

US President Donald Trump has once again accused his predecessor, former US president Joe Biden, of secretly planting hundreds of agents in the insurrectionist crowds at the Jan 6, 2021, Capitol riot. On Truth Social, the Republican leader whose incendiary speech is believed to have led to the Capitol riots alleged that "BIDEN FBI PLACED 274 AGENTS INTO THE CROWD ON JANUARY 6". He added that this means that a "lot of very good people will be owed big apologies," while rallying his audience to "DO SOMETHING!!!". Trump AGAIN claims Biden was behind the Jan 6 violence In his Truth Social post, Trump wrote, “THE BIDEN FBI PLACED 274 AGENTS INTO THE CROWD ON JANUARY 6. If this is so, which it is, a lot of very good people will be owed big apologies. What a SCAM - DO SOMETHING!!! President DJT.”

Donald Trump has again accused Joe Biden of planting 274 FBI agents in the crowd during the Jan 6 Capitol riots, calling it a “scam” and urging supporters to “do something.” Read full story.

‘Do something!!!’: Trump once again accuses Biden of planting 274 FBI agents at Jan 6 Capitol riot

The announcement also came amid speculation that former US President Donald Trump, who had actively campaigned for the award, might have been considered.

Who is María Corina Machado? The Venezuelan leader who snubbed Trump to win the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize

As the world awaits the announcement of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday (October 10), US President Donald J. Trump has once again become a focal point of speculation. Multiple nominations have been filed in his name this year, with proponents citing his administration’s role in brokering high-stakes agreements in the Middle East and the Caucasus. While Trump has long coveted the global recognition the prize confers, the Nobel Committee’s history of cautious selections raises questions about how realistic his chances truly are.<h2>Trump's role in peace deals and ceasefires</h2>Trump’s most cited diplomatic achievement remains the Abraham Accords of 2020, which normalised relations between Israel and several Arab countries— a landmark moment in Middle Eastern diplomacy. But more recent developments under his current term have revived the conversation. Besides this, his administration also helped broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas after weeks of intense fighting in Gaza. The deal, which included a large-scale prisoner exchange and international monitoring, drew praise from European diplomats and global leaders for preventing a prolonged war.&nbsp;Trump also played a behind-the-scenes role in ending the Armenia–Azerbaijan border conflict, with US envoys mediating a peace framework in tandem with the European Union. In both cases, the White House framed these agreements as evidence of Trump’s unconventional but effective diplomacy — the kind of decisive, transactional approach that supporters argue has produced results where prolonged negotiations failed.&nbsp;Several foreign lawmakers and political figures, including Malta’s foreign minister and a Norwegian parliamentarian, publicly announced they had submitted Trump’s name for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. Though the Nobel Committee does not publish its nomination list for 50 years, nominators often go public to build political momentum and shape the narrative around a candidate’s achievements. For Trump, who has repeatedly expressed frustration that he did not win the prize during his previous term, these announcements serve both a symbolic and strategic purpose.<h2>What the Nobel Committee looks for?</h2>Yet nominations are only the first step in a lengthy and highly confidential selection process. The Nobel Peace Prize is guided by Alfred Nobel’s will, which calls for honouring those who have done “the most or the best work for fraternity between countries, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Over the years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has interpreted these criteria with caution, often favouring diplomats, activists, or organisations that have fostered sustained peace or humanitarian progress over time.&nbsp;Trump’s polarising global image and his deeply divisive domestic standing complicate the picture. While his supporters highlight his role in reshaping alliances and reducing direct US military entanglements, critics argue that his diplomatic moves are transactional, short-term, and lacking multilateral backing — elements the Nobel Committee traditionally values. Historically, the Committee has avoided awarding sitting leaders embroiled in intense political controversies, preferring to wait until their legacies can be judged in full.&nbsp;Another hurdle is timing. Nobel nominations must be submitted by January 31 each year. Some of Trump’s recent nominations came after that deadline, which means they might only count for the 2026 prize cycle. Even if his achievements are considered this year, he faces stiff competition. With 338 candidates nominated for the 2025 prize, Trump’s path is narrow. Nonetheless, the possibility cannot be dismissed entirely. If the Nobel Committee chooses to make a bold statement recognising unconventional diplomacy and concrete ceasefire deals, Trump could be a surprise pick. But if past patterns are any indication, the Committee is more likely to favour long-term peace builders over polarising political figures still in office.&nbsp;For now, Trump’s Nobel ambitions remain a blend of diplomatic milestones and political theater. The answer will come from Oslo on Friday (October 10) — but the debate over whether Donald Trump deserves the world’s most symbolic peace prize is already raging far beyond Norway’s borders.&nbsp;Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

From ceasefires to Accords: Can US President Donald Trump really win the Nobel Peace Prize?

As the world awaits the announcement of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday (October 10), US President Donald J. Trump has once again become a focal point of speculation. Multiple nominations have been filed in his name this year, with proponents citing his administration’s role in brokering high-stakes agreements in the Middle East and the Caucasus. While Trump has long coveted the global recognition the prize confers, the Nobel Committee’s history of cautious selections raises questions about how realistic his chances truly are. Trump's role in peace deals and ceasefires Trump’s most cited diplomatic achievement remains the Abraham Accords of 2020, which normalised relations between Israel and several Arab countries— a landmark moment in Middle Eastern diplomacy. But more recent developments under his current term have revived the conversation. Besides this, his administration also helped broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas after weeks of intense fighting in Gaza. The deal, which included a large-scale prisoner exchange and international monitoring, drew praise from European diplomats and global leaders for preventing a prolonged war. Trump also played a behind-the-scenes role in ending the Armenia–Azerbaijan border conflict, with US envoys mediating a peace framework in tandem with the European Union. In both cases, the White House framed these agreements as evidence of Trump’s unconventional but effective diplomacy — the kind of decisive, transactional approach that supporters argue has produced results where prolonged negotiations failed. Several foreign lawmakers and political figures, including Malta’s foreign minister and a Norwegian parliamentarian, publicly announced they had submitted Trump’s name for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. Though the Nobel Committee does not publish its nomination list for 50 years, nominators often go public to build political momentum and shape the narrative around a candidate’s achievements. For Trump, who has repeatedly expressed frustration that he did not win the prize during his previous term, these announcements serve both a symbolic and strategic purpose. What the Nobel Committee looks for? Yet nominations are only the first step in a lengthy and highly confidential selection process. The Nobel Peace Prize is guided by Alfred Nobel’s will, which calls for honouring those who have done “the most or the best work for fraternity between countries, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Over the years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has interpreted these criteria with caution, often favouring diplomats, activists, or organisations that have fostered sustained peace or humanitarian progress over time. Trump’s polarising global image and his deeply divisive domestic standing complicate the picture. While his supporters highlight his role in reshaping alliances and reducing direct US military entanglements, critics argue that his diplomatic moves are transactional, short-term, and lacking multilateral backing — elements the Nobel Committee traditionally values. Historically, the Committee has avoided awarding sitting leaders embroiled in intense political controversies, preferring to wait until their legacies can be judged in full. Another hurdle is timing. Nobel nominations must be submitted by January 31 each year. Some of Trump’s recent nominations came after that deadline, which means they might only count for the 2026 prize cycle. Even if his achievements are considered this year, he faces stiff competition. With 338 candidates nominated for the 2025 prize, Trump’s path is narrow. Nonetheless, the possibility cannot be dismissed entirely. If the Nobel Committee chooses to make a bold statement recognising unconventional diplomacy and concrete ceasefire deals, Trump could be a surprise pick. But if past patterns are any indication, the Committee is more likely to favour long-term peace builders over polarising political figures still in office. For now, Trump’s Nobel ambitions remain a blend of diplomatic milestones and political theater. The answer will come from Oslo on Friday (October 10) — but the debate over whether Donald Trump deserves the world’s most symbolic peace prize is already raging far beyond Norway’s borders. Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

US President Donald Trump’s diplomatic moves have revived Nobel Peace Prize talk recently, but history and politics may temper expectations

The Trump administration is preparing to introduce new rules that could make it significantly tougher for foreign nationals to qualify for the H-1B visa. The changes are expected to focus on tightening eligibility, scrutinising employers, and enforcing stricter regulations, particularly around third-party placements and working conditions. These adjustments are part of a broader effort to reform the H-1B visa program, ensuring it better serves US workers while maintaining its role in attracting high-skilled foreign talent.&nbsp;The new regulations could further limit the ability of foreign workers to be placed at client sites, an issue that has sparked controversy in the past. The Trump administration aims to enforce policies that align with the original intent of the H-1B program: to fill high-skilled jobs in the US that are not easily filled by American workers. However, the implications of these changes are still being debated, with some arguing that it could make it harder for employers to recruit and retain qualified workers.<h3>Proposed Changes to H-1B Visa Regulations</h3>The Trump administration’s proposed reforms to the H-1B visa program are set to bring significant changes to both employers and foreign nationals seeking long-term employment in the US. Among the key proposals are stricter eligibility criteria for visa recipients, a crackdown on companies that violate existing program rules, and enhanced scrutiny of third-party placements. These reforms aim to prevent abuse of the system and protect US workers’ job opportunities and wages.&nbsp;One major aspect of the reform is the potential restriction on H-1B holders working at customer sites, a controversial issue that was part of the previous administration’s regulatory push. Employers may find it more difficult to place workers at customer locations, which could lead to shorter visa approval periods and tighter restrictions on job roles. This could impact industries such as IT and consulting, where third-party placements are common.<h3>Challenges and Legal Hurdles</h3>While the Trump administration hopes to avoid the legal setbacks that occurred during his first term, the proposed changes could still face challenges in the courts. A similar rule attempted in 2020 was blocked by a judge, who argued that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The Trump government is working to ensure the new rule is legally sound, with an aim to implement it without facing similar opposition. These challenges highlight the ongoing debate over how the H-1B program should be structured to balance the needs of foreign workers, US employers, and American job seekers.&nbsp;As these regulations move forward, companies and foreign workers will need to stay informed about the evolving landscape of US immigration laws. The proposed changes, once finalised, could reshape the H-1B visa process for years to come, making it critical for stakeholders to adapt to the new rules as soon as they are announced.

H-1B visa: Is Trump admin preparing to make it tougher to qualify? Here's what you should know

The Trump administration is preparing to introduce new rules that could make it significantly tougher for foreign nationals to qualify for the H-1B visa. The changes are expected to focus on tightening eligibility, scrutinising employers, and enforcing stricter regulations, particularly around third-party placements and working conditions. These adjustments are part of a broader effort to reform the H-1B visa program, ensuring it better serves US workers while maintaining its role in attracting high-skilled foreign talent. The new regulations could further limit the ability of foreign workers to be placed at client sites, an issue that has sparked controversy in the past. The Trump administration aims to enforce policies that align with the original intent of the H-1B program: to fill high-skilled jobs in the US that are not easily filled by American workers. However, the implications of these changes are still being debated, with some arguing that it could make it harder for employers to recruit and retain qualified workers. Proposed Changes to H-1B Visa Regulations The Trump administration’s proposed reforms to the H-1B visa program are set to bring significant changes to both employers and foreign nationals seeking long-term employment in the US. Among the key proposals are stricter eligibility criteria for visa recipients, a crackdown on companies that violate existing program rules, and enhanced scrutiny of third-party placements. These reforms aim to prevent abuse of the system and protect US workers’ job opportunities and wages. One major aspect of the reform is the potential restriction on H-1B holders working at customer sites, a controversial issue that was part of the previous administration’s regulatory push. Employers may find it more difficult to place workers at customer locations, which could lead to shorter visa approval periods and tighter restrictions on job roles. This could impact industries such as IT and consulting, where third-party placements are common. Challenges and Legal Hurdles While the Trump administration hopes to avoid the legal setbacks that occurred during his first term, the proposed changes could still face challenges in the courts. A similar rule attempted in 2020 was blocked by a judge, who argued that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The Trump government is working to ensure the new rule is legally sound, with an aim to implement it without facing similar opposition. These challenges highlight the ongoing debate over how the H-1B program should be structured to balance the needs of foreign workers, US employers, and American job seekers. As these regulations move forward, companies and foreign workers will need to stay informed about the evolving landscape of US immigration laws. The proposed changes, once finalised, could reshape the H-1B visa process for years to come, making it critical for stakeholders to adapt to the new rules as soon as they are announced.

Trump's administration is seeking to tighten H-1B visa rules, including limiting third-party placements and increasing oversight, potentially making it harder to qualify

The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize is scheduled to be announced on Friday, 10 October at 11 am Oslo time (2:30 pm IST) by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. Prior to the announcement, speculation around potential contenders has intensified. Out of those, the most vocal contender is United States President Donald Trump, who has continuously claimed for the suitable candidate who deserves the prize for supposedly resolving multiple global conflicts, including his oft-repeated claim of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after their four-day clash in May.&nbsp;After the Israel and Hamas agreement to pause the fighting in Gaza and release all hostages, White House dubbed Donald Trump as 'The Peace President' on the social media platform X. However, despite Trump's consistent public campaign and high-profile endorsements, international experts widely agree that Trump will not receive the honour — at least not this year.&nbsp;"No, it will not be Trump this year," said Peter Wallensteen, a Swedish professor and expert on international affairs, in an interview with the news agency AFP news agency. "But perhaps next year? By then, the dust will have settled around his various initiatives, including the Gaza crisis," he added.&nbsp;The director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo, Nina Graeger, indicated that there are several reasons why Trump’s record does not align with Alfred Nobel’s intent. “He has withdrawn the US from the World Health Organisation and from the Paris Accord on climate, he has initiated a trade war on old friends and allies," she said. “That is not exactly what we think about when we think about a peaceful president or someone who really is interested in promoting peace," Graeger added.&nbsp;Dr Samir Puri, director of the Centre for Global Governance and Security at Chatham House, told Sky News that “there’s an absurdity to Trump’s claims, but like many of his claims, within the absurdity there are sometimes grains of truth." However, he underscored that there is a “vast difference between getting fighting to stop in the short-term and resolving the root causes of the conflict." He also added that the efforts of Trump amount to “conflict management" rather than resolution.<h3>Who has nominated Trump for the Nobel?</h3><ul><li>Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir</li><li>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu</li><li>Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet</li><li>US Congressman Buddy Carter</li><li>Lawmakers from Sweden and Norway</li></ul><h3>If not Trump, then who will win the prize?</h3>This year, the Nobel Committee has nominated a total of 338 individuals and organisations for the coveted Nobel Peace Prize, although the list is kept sealed for 50 years. In this list, the eligible nominators include lawmakers, government officials, past laureates, select academics, and members of the Nobel committee.&nbsp;However, there are no clear and fixed frontrunners in 2025, as speculation revolves around a few high-profile contenders. Among the names being discussed are:&nbsp;<ul><li>Sudan’s Emergency Response Rooms, a volunteer network providing aid to civilians amid war and famine.</li><li>Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny.</li><li>The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, known for its election monitoring work.</li><li>United Nations Secretary General António Guterres.</li><li>UNHCR (UN High Commissioner for Refugees).</li><li>UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency) – The Palestinian refugee relief agency.</li><li>The International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ).</li><li>Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders – Both organisations have been highlighted for their commendable work in a year marked by record journalist deaths, particularly in Gaza.</li></ul><h3>Some other names officially include:</h3><ul><li>The Prime Minister of Malaysia, Anwar Ibrahim, was nominated for his “commitment to dialogue, regional harmony, and peace through non-coercive diplomacy." His role also includes mediating the Thailand–Cambodia ceasefire.</li><li>Tesla CEO Elon Musk was nominated by Slovenian EU parliamentarian Branko Grims for defending freedom of speech.</li><li>The former Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan, was nominated by the Pakistan World Alliance and Norwegian party Partiet Sentrum for his “work with human rights and democracy in Pakistan."</li></ul>Some observers believe the Nobel Committee may use this year’s award to reaffirm its support for a global order that faces increasing challenges from leaders like Donald Trump. Possible recipients in this category include UN Secretary-General António Guterres, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR), or UNRWA, the Palestinian relief organisation.&nbsp;Others suggest the prize could focus on global justice or press freedom, which will honour institutions which include the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, or watchdog groups like the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders.

After the Israel and Hamas agreement to pause the fighting in Gaza and release all hostages, White House dubbed Donald Trump as 'The Peace President' on the social media platform X. 

The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize is scheduled to be announced on Friday, 10 October at 11 am Oslo time (2:30 pm IST) by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. Prior to the announcement, speculation around potential contenders has intensified. Out of those, the most vocal contender is United States President Donald Trump, who has continuously claimed for the suitable candidate who deserves the prize for supposedly resolving multiple global conflicts, including his oft-repeated claim of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after their four-day clash in May. After the Israel and Hamas agreement to pause the fighting in Gaza and release all hostages, White House dubbed Donald Trump as 'The Peace President' on the social media platform X. However, despite Trump's consistent public campaign and high-profile endorsements, international experts widely agree that Trump will not receive the honour — at least not this year. "No, it will not be Trump this year," said Peter Wallensteen, a Swedish professor and expert on international affairs, in an interview with the news agency AFP news agency. "But perhaps next year? By then, the dust will have settled around his various initiatives, including the Gaza crisis," he added. The director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo, Nina Graeger, indicated that there are several reasons why Trump’s record does not align with Alfred Nobel’s intent. “He has withdrawn the US from the World Health Organisation and from the Paris Accord on climate, he has initiated a trade war on old friends and allies," she said. “That is not exactly what we think about when we think about a peaceful president or someone who really is interested in promoting peace," Graeger added. Dr Samir Puri, director of the Centre for Global Governance and Security at Chatham House, told Sky News that “there’s an absurdity to Trump’s claims, but like many of his claims, within the absurdity there are sometimes grains of truth." However, he underscored that there is a “vast difference between getting fighting to stop in the short-term and resolving the root causes of the conflict." He also added that the efforts of Trump amount to “conflict management" rather than resolution. Who has nominated Trump for the Nobel? Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet US Congressman Buddy Carter Lawmakers from Sweden and Norway If not Trump, then who will win the prize? This year, the Nobel Committee has nominated a total of 338 individuals and organisations for the coveted Nobel Peace Prize, although the list is kept sealed for 50 years. In this list, the eligible nominators include lawmakers, government officials, past laureates, select academics, and members of the Nobel committee. However, there are no clear and fixed frontrunners in 2025, as speculation revolves around a few high-profile contenders. Among the names being discussed are: Sudan’s Emergency Response Rooms, a volunteer network providing aid to civilians amid war and famine. Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, known for its election monitoring work. United Nations Secretary General António Guterres. UNHCR (UN High Commissioner for Refugees). UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency) – The Palestinian refugee relief agency. The International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders – Both organisations have been highlighted for their commendable work in a year marked by record journalist deaths, particularly in Gaza. Some other names officially include: The Prime Minister of Malaysia, Anwar Ibrahim, was nominated for his “commitment to dialogue, regional harmony, and peace through non-coercive diplomacy." His role also includes mediating the Thailand–Cambodia ceasefire. Tesla CEO Elon Musk was nominated by Slovenian EU parliamentarian Branko Grims for defending freedom of speech. The former Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan, was nominated by the Pakistan World Alliance and Norwegian party Partiet Sentrum for his “work with human rights and democracy in Pakistan." Some observers believe the Nobel Committee may use this year’s award to reaffirm its support for a global order that faces increasing challenges from leaders like Donald Trump. Possible recipients in this category include UN Secretary-General António Guterres, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR), or UNRWA, the Palestinian relief organisation. Others suggest the prize could focus on global justice or press freedom, which will honour institutions which include the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, or watchdog groups like the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders.

After the Israel and Hamas agreement to pause the fighting in Gaza and release all hostages, White House dubbed Donald Trump as 'The Peace President' on the social media platform X.&nbsp;

Will Donald Trump win Nobel Peace Prize or will it go to surprise candidate? Here's what experts suggest

US President Donald Trump has once again made a bold statement regarding his contributions on the global stage. He asserted that he has resolved more international conflicts than any other leader in history, including tensions between nuclear-armed countries and regional disputes. Specifically, Trump referenced his efforts in the India-Pakistan war earlier this year as a prime example of his conflict-resolution success. Speaking to reporters at the White House on Wednesday (October 8), Trump was asked about his chances of winning the Nobel Peace Prize this year. His response was characteristically self-assured, yet laced with a hint of skepticism. "I have no idea... Marco would tell you we settled seven wars. We're close to settling an eighth. I think we'll end up settling the Russia situation," he said, underscoring the scale of what he claims to be his diplomatic triumphs.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-everybody-s-liking-me-now-trump-speaks-to-netanyahu-after-hamas-agrees-for-first-phase-of-gaza-peace-plan-1759974963007">'Everybody's liking me now': Trump speaks to Netanyahu after Hamas agrees for first phase of Gaza peace plan</a>&nbsp;Trump’s remarks, however, are not new. The president has repeatedly said that he helped bring an end to multiple wars and geopolitical tensions during his time in office. His list of resolved conflicts, though, is somewhat vague. Trump has never provided an official or consistent tally of the wars he believes he helped end, but his claims have included high-profile issues such as the military standoff between India and Pakistan, the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute, and even tensions between Israel and Iran.<h2>Watch Donald Trump's reply here</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | On his chances of winning the Nobel Peace Prize, US President Donald Trump says, &quot;I have no idea... Marco would tell you we settled seven wars. We&#39;re close to settling an eighth. I think we&#39;ll end up settling the Russia situation... I don&#39;t think anybody in history has… <a href="https://t.co/xLUw1zwvee">pic.twitter.com/xLUw1zwvee</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1976034488615661614?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"I don’t think anybody in history has settled that many," Trump said confidently. Despite this, he added that he feels the Nobel Peace Prize may not be in his future, alluding to the possibility that the Norwegian Nobel Committee will find a reason to overlook him. "But perhaps they’ll find a reason not to give it to me," he quipped, seemingly acknowledging that, despite his diplomatic record, the prestigious award might elude him.&nbsp;Trump's self-assessment has drawn mixed reactions. Supporters argue that his direct approach to foreign policy, including brokering peace deals and facilitating dialogue between long-time adversaries, has been an underappreciated part of his presidency. Detractors, however, often point out the lack of concrete, long-lasting resolutions in many of the conflicts Trump mentions, questioning whether his interventions have truly led to lasting peace or merely temporary de-escalation.&nbsp;The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the most prestigious and highly scrutinised international honours, awarded annually to individuals or groups who have made significant contributions to peace. As the Nobel Prize announcements continue this week, with awards for medicine, physics, and chemistry already announced, all eyes will be on Friday’s announcement of the Peace Prize. Trump, despite his confident assertions, may find his name missing from the list of honourees—though he seems to expect that very outcome.

US President Donald Trump claims to have helped resolve multiple global conflicts, but suggests the Nobel Peace Prize may not be given to him despite his role in ending wars and tensions

US President Donald Trump has once again made a bold statement regarding his contributions on the global stage. He asserted that he has resolved more international conflicts than any other leader in history, including tensions between nuclear-armed countries and regional disputes. Specifically, Trump referenced his efforts in the India-Pakistan war earlier this year as a prime example of his conflict-resolution success. Speaking to reporters at the White House on Wednesday (October 8), Trump was asked about his chances of winning the Nobel Peace Prize this year. His response was characteristically self-assured, yet laced with a hint of skepticism. "I have no idea... Marco would tell you we settled seven wars. We're close to settling an eighth. I think we'll end up settling the Russia situation," he said, underscoring the scale of what he claims to be his diplomatic triumphs. Also Read: 'Everybody's liking me now': Trump speaks to Netanyahu after Hamas agrees for first phase of Gaza peace plan Trump’s remarks, however, are not new. The president has repeatedly said that he helped bring an end to multiple wars and geopolitical tensions during his time in office. His list of resolved conflicts, though, is somewhat vague. Trump has never provided an official or consistent tally of the wars he believes he helped end, but his claims have included high-profile issues such as the military standoff between India and Pakistan, the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute, and even tensions between Israel and Iran. Watch Donald Trump's reply here

US President Donald Trump claims to have helped resolve multiple global conflicts, but suggests the Nobel Peace Prize may not be given to him despite his role in ending wars and tensions

'They will find a reason...', says Donald Trump when asked if he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for resolving global conflicts

The Trump administration has ordered FBI employees in Washington, DC, and New York to search their offices for any records tied to the disappearance of aviator Amelia Earhart, reports citing law enforcement sources suggest. According to CNN, agents have received a high-priority message from leadership on Tuesday (Oct 7) marked “urgent,” directing them to search “any areas where papers or physical media records may be stored, to include both open or closed cases, for records responsive to Amelia Earhart.” The directive supposedly came directly from the Executive Office of the President. Employees have reportedly been given till Wednesday to respond. What's surprising is that this directive comes even as the federal government shutdown entered its seventh day.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-she-looked-dead-rapist-husamettin-dogan-s-appeal-backfires-as-gisele-pelicot-s-ex-husband-exposes-chilling-truth-in-court-1759904740119">‘She looked dead’: Rapist Husamettin Dogan’s appeal backfires as Gisele Pelicot’s ex-husband exposes chilling truth in court</a><h2>The mysterious disappearance of Amelia Earhart</h2>Earhart vanished in 1937 while attempting to become the first woman to fly around the world. She was declared lost at sea after a 16-day search when her plane disappeared somewhere over the Pacific.Last month, President Donald Trump said he was ordering his administration to declassify and release all records related to her disappearance.“Her disappearance, almost 90 years ago, has captivated millions,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “I am ordering my Administration to declassify and release all Government Records related to Amelia Earhart, her final trip, and everything else about her.”Earhart, who became the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean, broke multiple aviation records and remains one of the most iconic figures in flight history.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-sudden-death-syndrome-another-russian-elite-falls-to-death-former-pravda-publisher-vyacheslav-leontyev-latest-in-string-of-mystery-suicides-1759909542532">'Sudden Death Syndrome': Another Russian elite falls to death — former Pravda publisher Vyacheslav Leontyev latest in string of ‘mystery suicides’</a>Theories about what happened to her have persisted for decades, ranging from a crash at sea to claims she was captured by the Japanese during World War II. US officials have long believed Earhart’s plane likely ran out of fuel and went down in the Pacific. Trump has previously pushed to release long-classified files tied to other historic mysteries, including the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr.&nbsp;

The Trump administration has ordered FBI offices in DC and New York to urgently search for any records on Amelia Earhart, amid the federal shutdown. The directive follows Trump’s push to declassify all files on her 1937 disappearance, nearly 90 years after she vanished over the Pacific.

The Trump administration has ordered FBI employees in Washington, DC, and New York to search their offices for any records tied to the disappearance of aviator Amelia Earhart, reports citing law enforcement sources suggest. According to CNN, agents have received a high-priority message from leadership on Tuesday (Oct 7) marked “urgent,” directing them to search “any areas where papers or physical media records may be stored, to include both open or closed cases, for records responsive to Amelia Earhart.” The directive supposedly came directly from the Executive Office of the President. Employees have reportedly been given till Wednesday to respond. What's surprising is that this directive comes even as the federal government shutdown entered its seventh day. Also read | ‘She looked dead’: Rapist Husamettin Dogan’s appeal backfires as Gisele Pelicot’s ex-husband exposes chilling truth in court The mysterious disappearance of Amelia Earhart Earhart vanished in 1937 while attempting to become the first woman to fly around the world. She was declared lost at sea after a 16-day search when her plane disappeared somewhere over the Pacific. Last month, President Donald Trump said he was ordering his administration to declassify and release all records related to her disappearance. “Her disappearance, almost 90 years ago, has captivated millions,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “I am ordering my Administration to declassify and release all Government Records related to Amelia Earhart, her final trip, and everything else about her.” Earhart, who became the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean, broke multiple aviation records and remains one of the most iconic figures in flight history. Also read | 'Sudden Death Syndrome': Another Russian elite falls to death — former Pravda publisher Vyacheslav Leontyev latest in string of ‘mystery suicides’ Theories about what happened to her have persisted for decades, ranging from a crash at sea to claims she was captured by the Japanese during World War II. US officials have long believed Earhart’s plane likely ran out of fuel and went down in the Pacific. Trump has previously pushed to release long-classified files tied to other historic mysteries, including the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr.

The Trump administration has ordered FBI offices in DC and New York to urgently search for any records on Amelia Earhart, amid the federal shutdown. The directive follows Trump’s push to declassify all files on her 1937 disappearance, nearly 90 years after she vanished over the Pacific.

Trump orders FBI to 'urgently' search for Amelia Earhart files amid government shutdown

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker on Tuesday (Oct 7) launched a scathing attack on US President Donald Trump, and claimed that his decision to deploy National Guard troops to the Democratic cities of Chicago and Portland is because of 'dementia'.' He also said that Trump's tactics are straight out of Nazi playbook. The Rapid response team of President Trump slammed the Governor and called him a ‘scumbag’&nbsp;“This is a man who’s suffering dementia,” Pritzker said to multiple US news portals. ”What I know is in the early days of Nazi regime, they started slowly taking away people's right. And what we are seeing now is exactly the same thing. They have gone into cities now. Think about that in your lifetime have you ever seen anything like that? Has any President of US sent troops with weapons into major cities of the US? It is wrong," he added.&nbsp;The White House slammed the Governor and said that he is "fomenting more deranged violence from his Radical Left lunatic supporters." In a post on X, the White House also called Pritkzer “one SICK scumbag.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">.<a href="https://twitter.com/GovPritzker?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@GovPritzker</a> calls President Trump a Nazi — fomenting more deranged violence from his Radical Left lunatic supporters. Pritkzer is one SICK scumbag. <a href="https://t.co/7rjqrd2g08">pic.twitter.com/7rjqrd2g08</a>&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1975720022883639602?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The governor made his remarks as National Guard troops from Texas started gathering at a US Army Reserve training center in Elwood, a suburb in the far southwest of Illinois. At the same time, the Trump administration was proceeding with plans to deploy 300 Illinois National Guard members for a minimum of 60 days.During the interview, Governor Pritzker — a potential Democratic contender for the 2028 presidential race — ruled out armed violence against the Trump administration and said that the legal system would be key in opposing Trump’s actions both in Illinois and across the country.&nbsp;“We’re not going to engage in an armed conflict between Illinois and the federal government,” Pritzker stated. “But we are keeping a close watch on everything they do and will use that information to challenge them in court.”&nbsp;

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker harshly criticized President Trump, accusing him of deploying National Guard troops to Democratic cities due to mental impairment. Pritzker vowed legal action, ruled out violent resistance or "soft secession," and emphasized the importance of court battles

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker on Tuesday (Oct 7) launched a scathing attack on US President Donald Trump, and claimed that his decision to deploy National Guard troops to the Democratic cities of Chicago and Portland is because of 'dementia'.' He also said that Trump's tactics are straight out of Nazi playbook. The Rapid response team of President Trump slammed the Governor and called him a ‘scumbag’ “This is a man who’s suffering dementia,” Pritzker said to multiple US news portals. ”What I know is in the early days of Nazi regime, they started slowly taking away people's right. And what we are seeing now is exactly the same thing. They have gone into cities now. Think about that in your lifetime have you ever seen anything like that? Has any President of US sent troops with weapons into major cities of the US? It is wrong," he added. The White House slammed the Governor and said that he is "fomenting more deranged violence from his Radical Left lunatic supporters." In a post on X, the White House also called Pritkzer “one SICK scumbag.”

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker harshly criticised President Trump, accusing him of deploying National Guard troops to Democratic cities due to mental impairment. Pritzker vowed legal action, ruled out violent resistance&nbsp;

'SICK scumbag': Pritzker claims Trump is suffering from dementia, calls him Nazi; White House hits back

Bad Bunny is set to perform at the halftime show of the 2026 Super Bowl. While fans around the world have enjoyed and danced to his music, US President Donald Trump seems unfamiliar with the artist. In response to the announcement of Bunny as the halftime show headliner, Trump referred to the Latin singer as a "rabbit" while mocking him.<h2>Donald Trump on Bad Bunny Super Bowl Halftime Show: “Never Heard of Him”</h2>During an interview on Newsmax's Greg Kelly Reports, Trump, on Bunny's performance, said that it's ''absolutely ridiculous.''&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ice-turns-arrest-into-meme-mocks-detainee-in-bizarre-ride-of-shame-video-outrage-erupts-as-white-house-reposts-video-watch-1759732361629">ICE turns arrest into meme; mocks detainee in bizarre ‘ride of shame’ video — outrage erupts as White House reposts video. Watch!&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;Speaking about the Grammy-winning singer, Kelly said, “The NFL just chose the Bad Bunny rabbit or whatever his name is. This guy, who hates ICE, he doesn’t like you, he accuses everything he doesn’t like of racism.”&nbsp;Responding to this, Trump said, “I’ve never heard of him. I don’t know who he is… I don’t know why they’re doing it. It’s crazy. And then they blame it on some promoter they hired to pick up entertainment — I think it’s absolutely ridiculous.”<h2>ICE fears at the Super Bowl</h2>&nbsp;Bunny, a record-breaking Latin music star, has won multiple Grammys, Latin Grammys, and several prestigious awards. &nbsp;Soon after Bunny's performance was announced, Trump adviser Corey Lewandowski said the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would be active during the show.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-served-beef-didn-t-provide-medicine-indian-origin-woman-73-recounts-treatment-during-ice-detention-deportation-flight-to-india-1758983340851">‘Served beef, no medicine’: Indian-origin woman, 73, recounts ICE detention</a>&nbsp;''There is nowhere you can provide a haven to people who are in this country illegally. Not the Super Bowl and nowhere else.''Lewandowski said.&nbsp;Notably, the Super Bowl will be Bunny's only US performance in 2026 as he will be performing his highly anticipated Debí Tirar Más Fotos World Tour, which has no dates in the US.&nbsp;Speaking to I-D magazine, Bunny said that due to the fear of an ICE raid, he has chosen not to perform in the US. He has previously slammed ICE over arrests in Puerto Rico.&nbsp;

Donald Trump on Bad Bunny Super Bowl Halftime Show Pick: “Never Heard of Him.'' During an interview on Newsmax's Greg Kelly Reports, Trump, on Bunny's performance, said that it's ''absolutely ridiculous.''

Bad Bunny is set to perform at the halftime show of the 2026 Super Bowl. While fans around the world have enjoyed and danced to his music, US President Donald Trump seems unfamiliar with the artist. In response to the announcement of Bunny as the halftime show headliner, Trump referred to the Latin singer as a "rabbit" while mocking him. Donald Trump on Bad Bunny Super Bowl Halftime Show: “Never Heard of Him” During an interview on Newsmax's Greg Kelly Reports, Trump, on Bunny's performance, said that it's ''absolutely ridiculous.'' Also read: ICE turns arrest into meme; mocks detainee in bizarre ‘ride of shame’ video — outrage erupts as White House reposts video. Watch! Speaking about the Grammy-winning singer, Kelly said, “The NFL just chose the Bad Bunny rabbit or whatever his name is. This guy, who hates ICE, he doesn’t like you, he accuses everything he doesn’t like of racism.” Responding to this, Trump said, “I’ve never heard of him. I don’t know who he is… I don’t know why they’re doing it. It’s crazy. And then they blame it on some promoter they hired to pick up entertainment — I think it’s absolutely ridiculous.” ICE fears at the Super Bowl Bunny, a record-breaking Latin music star, has won multiple Grammys, Latin Grammys, and several prestigious awards. Soon after Bunny's performance was announced, Trump adviser Corey Lewandowski said the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would be active during the show. Also read: ‘Served beef, no medicine’: Indian-origin woman, 73, recounts ICE detention ''There is nowhere you can provide a haven to people who are in this country illegally. Not the Super Bowl and nowhere else.''Lewandowski said. Notably, the Super Bowl will be Bunny's only US performance in 2026 as he will be performing his highly anticipated Debí Tirar Más Fotos World Tour, which has no dates in the US. Speaking to I-D magazine, Bunny said that due to the fear of an ICE raid, he has chosen not to perform in the US. He has previously slammed ICE over arrests in Puerto Rico.

US President Donald Trump is not aware of who Bad Bunny is. Days after the NFL announced Bunny as the Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026 headliner, Trump has shared a controversial comment.&nbsp;

Donald Trump on Bad Bunny performing at the Super Bowl: 'I don’t know who he is’

Questions over US President Donald Trump’s health resurfaced Tuesday (Oct 7) after new photos showed his visibly swollen ankles during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House. The 79-year-old's glum ramblings about "being good" so he could get into heaven didn't help the matter.<h2>Swollen ankles take up space in the spotlight AGAIN!</h2>Images from the Oval Office appeared to show the 79-year-old president’s ankles bulging over the tops of his black dress shoes as he sat alongside Carney and Vice President JD Vance. The two leaders met to discuss trade relations, though the talks ended without a breakthrough.The swelling, which medical experts say is common among older adults, has been visible for several months. In July, the White House confirmed that Trump had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a condition in which weakened veins slow the return of blood to the heart, leading to fluid buildup in the legs.Also read |&nbsp;<h2>'Healthier and stronger', but wrestling with the question of what happens once you die?</h2>On Monday (Oct 6), during a press conference, he once again rambled on about the theological pondering thinkers have battled for ages: How to get into heaven?. In an ominous statement, the POTUS said, "You know, there’s no reason to be good," before adding, "I wanna be good because you wanna prove to God you’re good so you go to that next step, right?". His statement has once again raised questions about the real condition of his health.Trump, the oldest president ever inaugurated, has continued to brush off speculation about his fitness. Speaking to Navy personnel over the weekend, he said doctors had described him as a "healthier and stronger physical specimen" than former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush.Still, observers have noted several public appearances where Trump appeared unsteady or unable to walk in a straight line. Photos have also shown what appeared to be bruising on his right hand, which he unsuccessfully tried to cover up by plastering on mismatched makeup. The White House has attempted to explain this as something caused by "vigorous handshaking" and the regular use of aspirin for cardiovascular prevention. Speculators, however, have questions about Trump's fitness.<h2>White House dismisses reports</h2>According to the Daily Beast, when contacted about the latest photos, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said Trump enjoys "tremendous health," adding that he maintains "the vitality, mental acuity, and energy levels that most young people could not fathom having."Yet, official White House social media posts from Tuesday's meeting appear to avoid showing the president's lower limbs, instead focusing on close-ups and cropped images of the leaders' discussions.&nbsp;

Questions over US President Donald Trump’s health have flared up again after new photos from his Oval Office meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney showed his ankles visibly swollen. And his talk about being “good” to appease God isn't helping. All you need to know.

Questions over US President Donald Trump’s health resurfaced Tuesday (Oct 7) after new photos showed his visibly swollen ankles during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House. The 79-year-old's glum ramblings about "being good" so he could get into heaven didn't help the matter. Swollen ankles take up space in the spotlight AGAIN! Images from the Oval Office appeared to show the 79-year-old president’s ankles bulging over the tops of his black dress shoes as he sat alongside Carney and Vice President JD Vance. The two leaders met to discuss trade relations, though the talks ended without a breakthrough. The swelling, which medical experts say is common among older adults, has been visible for several months. In July, the White House confirmed that Trump had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a condition in which weakened veins slow the return of blood to the heart, leading to fluid buildup in the legs. Also read | 'Healthier and stronger', but wrestling with the question of what happens once you die? On Monday (Oct 6), during a press conference, he once again rambled on about the theological pondering thinkers have battled for ages: How to get into heaven?. In an ominous statement, the POTUS said, "You know, there’s no reason to be good," before adding, "I wanna be good because you wanna prove to God you’re good so you go to that next step, right?". His statement has once again raised questions about the real condition of his health. Trump, the oldest president ever inaugurated, has continued to brush off speculation about his fitness. Speaking to Navy personnel over the weekend, he said doctors had described him as a "healthier and stronger physical specimen" than former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush. Still, observers have noted several public appearances where Trump appeared unsteady or unable to walk in a straight line. Photos have also shown what appeared to be bruising on his right hand, which he unsuccessfully tried to cover up by plastering on mismatched makeup. The White House has attempted to explain this as something caused by "vigorous handshaking" and the regular use of aspirin for cardiovascular prevention. Speculators, however, have questions about Trump's fitness. White House dismisses reports According to the Daily Beast, when contacted about the latest photos, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said Trump enjoys "tremendous health," adding that he maintains "the vitality, mental acuity, and energy levels that most young people could not fathom having." Yet, official White House social media posts from Tuesday's meeting appear to avoid showing the president's lower limbs, instead focusing on close-ups and cropped images of the leaders' discussions.

Questions over US President Donald Trump’s health have flared up again after new photos from his Oval Office meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney showed his ankles visibly swollen. And his talk about being “good” to appease God isn't helping. All you need to know.

Photos of Trump’s swollen ankles during Carney meet reignite health rumours — and his talk about heaven isn’t helping

US President Donald Trump, while speaking from the White House on Tuesday (October 7), said that his team is in "serious negotiations on Gaza". Marking the two years of Israel-Hamas war in the Strip, the American president said, "Our team is in Egypt now, another team just left too. In serious negotiations on Gaza, there's a possibility we can have peace in the Middle East."&nbsp;"We have some natural conflict. natural business conflict there is nothing wrong. There will be something we will work together," the American president added. This came after Trump expressed his frustration at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for being "so f***ing negative" about the same.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-hamas-war-how-did-2-years-of-conflict-affect-gaza-in-numbers-1759849558528">Israel-Hamas war: How did 2 years of conflict affect Gaza - In numbers</a>&nbsp;“I think there's a possibility that we could have peace in the Middle East. It's something even beyond the Gaza situation. We want a release of the hostages immediately,” Trump said. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Israeli PM said that the war in Gaza will only end when all hostages are returned and Hamas has been disarmed.&nbsp;Also, Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer is likely to join the ceasefire talks at Sharm el-Sheikh on Wednesday (October 8).&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/was-it-trump-us-president-answers-interview-questions-via-text-internet-wonders-what-s-wrong-with-his-health-1759853884623">Was it Trump? US President answers interview questions...via text. Internet wonders what's wrong with his health</a>&nbsp;Dermer is the head of the Israeli negotiation team, but he hasn’t been part of the Israel-Hamas indirect negotiations on Monday or Tuesday, which were handled by a lower-level delegation.&nbsp;Moreover, the American president also talked about the US government shutdown. “There are some people that don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way,” Trump said during an event at the White House.

This came after Trump expressed his frustration at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for being so f***ing negative about the same.

US President Donald Trump, while speaking from the White House on Tuesday (October 7), said that his team is in "serious negotiations on Gaza". Marking the two years of Israel-Hamas war in the Strip, the American president said, "Our team is in Egypt now, another team just left too. In serious negotiations on Gaza, there's a possibility we can have peace in the Middle East." "We have some natural conflict. natural business conflict there is nothing wrong. There will be something we will work together," the American president added. This came after Trump expressed his frustration at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for being "so f***ing negative" about the same. Also read: Israel-Hamas war: How did 2 years of conflict affect Gaza - In numbers “I think there's a possibility that we could have peace in the Middle East. It's something even beyond the Gaza situation. We want a release of the hostages immediately,” Trump said. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Israeli PM said that the war in Gaza will only end when all hostages are returned and Hamas has been disarmed. Also, Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer is likely to join the ceasefire talks at Sharm el-Sheikh on Wednesday (October 8). Also read: Was it Trump? US President answers interview questions...via text. Internet wonders what's wrong with his health Dermer is the head of the Israeli negotiation team, but he hasn’t been part of the Israel-Hamas indirect negotiations on Monday or Tuesday, which were handled by a lower-level delegation. Moreover, the American president also talked about the US government shutdown. “There are some people that don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way,” Trump said during an event at the White House.

This came after Trump expressed his frustration at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for being "so f***ing negative" about the same.

'In serious negotiations on Gaza, possibility of peace in Middle East': Trump

US President Donald Trump is once again in discussion about his health as he was seen answering in a recent interview via text. The 79-year-old delivered State of the Union host Jake Tapper an exclusive interview on CNN, but, strangely, he texted his answers at an unspecified period before the show rather than calling or speaking in person. Moreover, the president's texts were displayed graphically on the screen during the interview.&nbsp;The Republican's health has been at the centre of discussion since he became the oldest president in American history.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/watch-zohran-mamdani-visits-temples-in-nyc-says-proud-of-my-hindu-heritage-1759838827884">WATCH: Zohran Mamdani visits temples in NYC, says ‘proud of my Hindu heritage’</a>&nbsp;In his message, Trump said that he hoped the current Israel conflict would end peacefully and that Hamas would be “completely obliterated” if they did not return the captives.&nbsp;How did the internet react?&nbsp;After the CNN interview went live, netizens blasted the internet with their conspiracy theories regarding the president.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/syria-kurdish-forces-announce-comprehensive-ceasefire-here-s-what-it-means-1759837864188">Syria-Kurdish force announce ‘comprehensive’ ceasefire. Here’s what it means</a>&nbsp;“'Texted'... 'Proof of life'?” one person said.&nbsp;“CNN announces that Jake Tapper has interviewed Trump about the Gaza deal... The show opens and Tapper says the interview was via text message!” another tweeted.&nbsp;“What is wrong with Donald Trump so that he is not able to even do a telephone interview?” a third user commented.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-must-move-quickly-or-trump-warns-hamas-says-will-not-tolerate-any-delay-in-gaza-peace-plan-1759592960348">‘Must move quickly, or....’: Trump warns Hamas, says will ‘not tolerate’ any delay in Gaza peace plan</a>&nbsp;Meanwhile, a fourth user said, “Anyone could have answered those questions for him. How does Tapper even ensure that was Trump? That was pathetic."

In his message, Trump said that he hoped the current Israel conflict would end peacefully and that Hamas would be completely obliterated if they did not return the captives.



US President Donald Trump is once again in discussion about his health as he was seen answering in a recent interview via text. The 79-year-old delivered State of the Union host Jake Tapper an exclusive interview on CNN, but, strangely, he texted his answers at an unspecified period before the show rather than calling or speaking in person. Moreover, the president's texts were displayed graphically on the screen during the interview. The Republican's health has been at the centre of discussion since he became the oldest president in American history. Also read: WATCH: Zohran Mamdani visits temples in NYC, says ‘proud of my Hindu heritage’ In his message, Trump said that he hoped the current Israel conflict would end peacefully and that Hamas would be “completely obliterated” if they did not return the captives. How did the internet react? After the CNN interview went live, netizens blasted the internet with their conspiracy theories regarding the president. Also read: Syria-Kurdish force announce ‘comprehensive’ ceasefire. Here’s what it means “'Texted'... 'Proof of life'?” one person said. “CNN announces that Jake Tapper has interviewed Trump about the Gaza deal... The show opens and Tapper says the interview was via text message!” another tweeted. “What is wrong with Donald Trump so that he is not able to even do a telephone interview?” a third user commented. Also read:‘Must move quickly, or....’: Trump warns Hamas, says will ‘not tolerate’ any delay in Gaza peace plan Meanwhile, a fourth user said, “Anyone could have answered those questions for him. How does Tapper even ensure that was Trump? That was pathetic."

In his message, Trump said that he hoped the current Israel conflict would end peacefully and that Hamas would be “completely obliterated” if they did not return the captives.&nbsp;

Was it Trump? US President answers interview questions...via text. Internet wonders what's wrong with his health

A Netflix documentary shows chimpanzee expert and conservationist Jane Goodall, who recently passed away, talking about which men she would love to send out of Earth and onto another planet, which "he’s sure he’s going to discover." In the documentary series titled Famous Last Words, Goodall revealed the names of these politicians in an interview in March. Goodall says she would love to put billionaire Elon Musk, US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on "one of [Elon] Musk’s spaceships", and ship them off to another planet. At the time, Goodall understood that the interview would only be released after her death. She even named Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping.&nbsp;“There are people I don’t like. And I would like to put them on one of Musk’s spaceships and send them all off to the planet he’s sure he’s going to discover," Goodall told TV writer Brad Falchuk. She then lists the "world leaders" she wants off the planet. “Along with Musk, would be Trump, and some of Trump’s real supporters. And then I would put [Russian President Vladimir] Putin in there, and I would put President Xi [Jinping of China]. I’d certainly put [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu in there and his far-right government,” Goodall said.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-messenger-of-peace-jane-goodall-trailblazing-primatologist-and-conservationist-dies-at-91-1759367920596">'Messenger of Peace': Jane Goodall, trailblazing primatologist, and conservationist, dies at 91</a> &nbsp;<h2>Musk's grand plans to settle humans on Mars</h2>Musk has made Starship, the biggest rocket ever, which he claims can take humans and cargo to Mars. He has envisioned building a society on the Red Planet and plans on doing so within the next decade. Goodall's list stems from the world conflicts that are currently brewing. She was a United Nations Messenger of Peace and spoke on the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war on the International Day of Peace in September 2024. “Let us pray for the end of conflict, especially the genocide of the people of Gaza," Goodall said. She prayed for the safety of "those risking their lives to help the wounded and feed the hungry and care for the animals suffering as a result of human violence, cruelty and war."&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/jane-goodall-primate-expert-and-wildlife-advocate-dies-at-91-1759425669343/embed<h2>Musk, Trump and DOGE</h2>Goodall has, in the past, even compared Trump to chimpanzees she cared for all these years. "In many ways, the performances of Donald Trump remind me of male chimpanzees and their dominance rituals,” Goodall told The Atlantic in 2016. Meanwhile, Musk and Trump shared a close relationship in the build-up to the 2024 elections. After the latter became president, he made Musk the leader of a new group called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) aimed at reducing federal costs.&nbsp;

Chimpanzee expert and conservationist Jane Goodall said in an interview that the world would be a better place without Trump, Netanyahu and Musk. She listed two more world leaders whom she would like to ship off Earth to another planet. 

A Netflix documentary shows chimpanzee expert and conservationist Jane Goodall, who recently passed away, talking about which men she would love to send out of Earth and onto another planet, which "he’s sure he’s going to discover." In the documentary series titled Famous Last Words, Goodall revealed the names of these politicians in an interview in March. Goodall says she would love to put billionaire Elon Musk, US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on "one of [Elon] Musk’s spaceships", and ship them off to another planet. At the time, Goodall understood that the interview would only be released after her death. She even named Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. “There are people I don’t like. And I would like to put them on one of Musk’s spaceships and send them all off to the planet he’s sure he’s going to discover," Goodall told TV writer Brad Falchuk. She then lists the "world leaders" she wants off the planet. “Along with Musk, would be Trump, and some of Trump’s real supporters. And then I would put [Russian President Vladimir] Putin in there, and I would put President Xi [Jinping of China]. I’d certainly put [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu in there and his far-right government,” Goodall said. Also Read: 'Messenger of Peace': Jane Goodall, trailblazing primatologist, and conservationist, dies at 91 Musk's grand plans to settle humans on Mars Musk has made Starship, the biggest rocket ever, which he claims can take humans and cargo to Mars. He has envisioned building a society on the Red Planet and plans on doing so within the next decade. Goodall's list stems from the world conflicts that are currently brewing. She was a United Nations Messenger of Peace and spoke on the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war on the International Day of Peace in September 2024. “Let us pray for the end of conflict, especially the genocide of the people of Gaza," Goodall said. She prayed for the safety of "those risking their lives to help the wounded and feed the hungry and care for the animals suffering as a result of human violence, cruelty and war." https://www.wionews.com/videos/jane-goodall-primate-expert-and-wildlife-advocate-dies-at-91-1759425669343/embed Musk, Trump and DOGE Goodall has, in the past, even compared Trump to chimpanzees she cared for all these years. "In many ways, the performances of Donald Trump remind me of male chimpanzees and their dominance rituals,” Goodall told The Atlantic in 2016. Meanwhile, Musk and Trump shared a close relationship in the build-up to the 2024 elections. After the latter became president, he made Musk the leader of a new group called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) aimed at reducing federal costs.

Chimpanzee expert and conservationist Jane Goodall said in an interview that the world would be a better place without Trump, Netanyahu and Musk. She listed two more world leaders whom she would like to ship off Earth to another planet.&nbsp;

Jane Goodall's 'last words': Ship off Trump, Putin and THESE leaders to another planet 'on one of Musk’s spaceships'

Amid ongoing protests in cities like Portland, Oregon, President Donald Trump has increasingly discussed the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act. This law grants the president authority to deploy federal troops within the United States during times of civil unrest, but its use has sparked significant debate.<h2>What is the Insurrection Act?</h2>The Insurrection Act is a law passed in 1792 that allows the US President to deploy the military within the United States to address civil unrest, insurrection, or rebellion. The law gives the president the power to send federal troops to suppress violent protests or unrest, especially in cases where local authorities are unable to maintain order or enforce federal law. The Insurrection Act operates alongside the Posse Comitatus Act (1878), which generally restricts the use of military forces inside the US against its citizens. However, the Insurrection Act creates an exemption, granting the president special authority in situations that threaten public safety, federal authority, or national security.<h2>Can the president invoke the Insurrection Act?</h2>Yes, the president has the power to invoke the Insurrection Act, but the process can vary depending on the situation. Typically, the act is invoked when a state governor or state legislature requests federal assistance. This was the case in 1992 when California’s Governor Pete Wilson requested federal help to manage the violent Los Angeles riots. President George HW Bush then deployed federal troops to restore order.&nbsp;However, the Insurrection Act also allows the president to bypass state authorities if the situation becomes dire enough. For instance, if there is widespread “unlawful obstruction” or “rebellion” against federal authority, the President may invoke the act to send troops, even if state or local leaders oppose such intervention. In other words, the President has the discretion to deploy military forces without local consent if the law requires it. In recent remarks, Trump has suggested that he could invoke the Insurrection Act in response to ongoing protests in cities like Portland. Trump has described these protests as an “insurrection” and has vowed to restore order, even if that means bypassing local governments.<h2>How does the Insurrection Act work?</h2>The Insurrection Act authorises the president to call on the US military or National Guard to help enforce federal laws, maintain order, or suppress large-scale civil unrest. The law specifically comes into play when it is deemed impossible to enforce federal laws through the normal course of judicial proceedings. In essence, the president is granted emergency powers to use military forces when a crisis overwhelms local law enforcement and threatens public order. The use of troops is meant to restore stability and ensure that federal law is upheld, especially in cases where rebellion or violence undermines the functioning of government institutions.<h2>Has the Insurrection Act been used before?</h2>Yes, the Insurrection Act has been used on a few notable occasions, including during times of civil unrest or resistance to federal authority. One of the most famous instances occurred during the Civil Rights Movement. In 1957, President Dwight D Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to send the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce the desegregation of public schools. This was in response to the state governor’s refusal to allow nine Black students to attend a previously all-white school.&nbsp;&nbsp;Eisenhower’s intervention was pivotal in ensuring the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was enforced.Similarly, President John F Kennedy used the Insurrection Act in 1962 to send federal marshals and troops to the University of Mississippi to enforce the desegregation of the school after violent resistance from local authorities and white supremacist groups. The most recent use of the Insurrection Act occurred in 1992, when President George H.W. Bush deployed federal forces to quell the Los Angeles riots following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King. In this case, California's governor had requested federal help to restore order.<h2>Trump’s consideration to use Insurrection Act amid protests</h2>In 2020 and 2021, Donald Trump frequently referenced the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act to respond to protests and civil unrest, particularly those related to police violence and racial injustice. Protests erupted in cities across the United States following the death of George Floyd, and Trump characterized many of the demonstrations as "violent" or "insurrectionary."Trump has suggested that he could invoke the Insurrection Act to send federal troops into cities like Portland, where protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and police brutality had been ongoing. He described the protests as “violent” and pledged to restore order, claiming the law gave him the authority to deploy federal troops without local consent.<h2>What are the criticisms of using the Insurrection Act?</h2>While the Insurrection Act is a powerful tool that allows the President to restore order during civil unrest, its use is often highly controversial. Critics of Trump’s potential use of the law argue that sending federal troops into cities could exacerbate tensions, escalate violence, and violate the civil liberties of American citizens. There are concerns that invoking the Insurrection Act could infringe upon states’ rights by overriding local authority and using federal military forces to manage issues traditionally handled by state and local law enforcement. Furthermore, opponents argue that the use of federal troops could stoke further unrest, potentially leading to an erosion of public trust in law enforcement and the federal government.<h2>Can the president deploy troops without the Insurrection Act?</h2>In some cases, the president can deploy federal troops without invoking the Insurrection Act, but this typically occurs when the federal government has a direct interest in maintaining control over certain areas, such as protecting federal property or enforcing federal law. However, the Insurrection Act provides a legal framework for the president to take more decisive and broader action in the event of large-scale civil disturbances. It allows the president to call on military resources to address widespread unrest, something that may be deemed necessary when local authorities are overwhelmed or unwilling to cooperate.

Anti-ICE protests: What is the Insurrection Act, and why is US President Donald Trump talking about it? Know all about it

Amid ongoing protests in cities like Portland, Oregon, President Donald Trump has increasingly discussed the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act. This law grants the president authority to deploy federal troops within the United States during times of civil unrest, but its use has sparked significant debate. What is the Insurrection Act? The Insurrection Act is a law passed in 1792 that allows the US President to deploy the military within the United States to address civil unrest, insurrection, or rebellion. The law gives the president the power to send federal troops to suppress violent protests or unrest, especially in cases where local authorities are unable to maintain order or enforce federal law. The Insurrection Act operates alongside the Posse Comitatus Act (1878), which generally restricts the use of military forces inside the US against its citizens. However, the Insurrection Act creates an exemption, granting the president special authority in situations that threaten public safety, federal authority, or national security. Can the president invoke the Insurrection Act? Yes, the president has the power to invoke the Insurrection Act, but the process can vary depending on the situation. Typically, the act is invoked when a state governor or state legislature requests federal assistance. This was the case in 1992 when California’s Governor Pete Wilson requested federal help to manage the violent Los Angeles riots. President George HW Bush then deployed federal troops to restore order. However, the Insurrection Act also allows the president to bypass state authorities if the situation becomes dire enough. For instance, if there is widespread “unlawful obstruction” or “rebellion” against federal authority, the President may invoke the act to send troops, even if state or local leaders oppose such intervention. In other words, the President has the discretion to deploy military forces without local consent if the law requires it. In recent remarks, Trump has suggested that he could invoke the Insurrection Act in response to ongoing protests in cities like Portland. Trump has described these protests as an “insurrection” and has vowed to restore order, even if that means bypassing local governments. How does the Insurrection Act work? The Insurrection Act authorises the president to call on the US military or National Guard to help enforce federal laws, maintain order, or suppress large-scale civil unrest. The law specifically comes into play when it is deemed impossible to enforce federal laws through the normal course of judicial proceedings. In essence, the president is granted emergency powers to use military forces when a crisis overwhelms local law enforcement and threatens public order. The use of troops is meant to restore stability and ensure that federal law is upheld, especially in cases where rebellion or violence undermines the functioning of government institutions. Has the Insurrection Act been used before? Yes, the Insurrection Act has been used on a few notable occasions, including during times of civil unrest or resistance to federal authority. One of the most famous instances occurred during the Civil Rights Movement. In 1957, President Dwight D Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to send the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce the desegregation of public schools. This was in response to the state governor’s refusal to allow nine Black students to attend a previously all-white school. Eisenhower’s intervention was pivotal in ensuring the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was enforced. Similarly, President John F Kennedy used the Insurrection Act in 1962 to send federal marshals and troops to the University of Mississippi to enforce the desegregation of the school after violent resistance from local authorities and white supremacist groups. The most recent use of the Insurrection Act occurred in 1992, when President George H.W. Bush deployed federal forces to quell the Los Angeles riots following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King. In this case, California's governor had requested federal help to restore order. Trump’s consideration to use Insurrection Act amid protests In 2020 and 2021, Donald Trump frequently referenced the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act to respond to protests and civil unrest, particularly those related to police violence and racial injustice. Protests erupted in cities across the United States following the death of George Floyd, and Trump characterized many of the demonstrations as "violent" or "insurrectionary." Trump has suggested that he could invoke the Insurrection Act to send federal troops into cities like Portland, where protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and police brutality had been ongoing. He described the protests as “violent” and pledged to restore order, claiming the law gave him the authority to deploy federal troops without local consent. What are the criticisms of using the Insurrection Act? While the Insurrection Act is a powerful tool that allows the President to restore order during civil unrest, its use is often highly controversial. Critics of Trump’s potential use of the law argue that sending federal troops into cities could exacerbate tensions, escalate violence, and violate the civil liberties of American citizens. There are concerns that invoking the Insurrection Act could infringe upon states’ rights by overriding local authority and using federal military forces to manage issues traditionally handled by state and local law enforcement. Furthermore, opponents argue that the use of federal troops could stoke further unrest, potentially leading to an erosion of public trust in law enforcement and the federal government. Can the president deploy troops without the Insurrection Act? In some cases, the president can deploy federal troops without invoking the Insurrection Act, but this typically occurs when the federal government has a direct interest in maintaining control over certain areas, such as protecting federal property or enforcing federal law. However, the Insurrection Act provides a legal framework for the president to take more decisive and broader action in the event of large-scale civil disturbances. It allows the president to call on military resources to address widespread unrest, something that may be deemed necessary when local authorities are overwhelmed or unwilling to cooperate.

President Donald Trump explores using the Insurrection Act to send troops to Portland and other cities, asserting federal authority over local protest objections

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Oct 6) denied reports that he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “stop being so f***ing negative” and “take the win” after Hamas partially accepted Washington’s proposal to end the Gaza war. Talking to reporters in the Oval Office, the POTUS, when asked about reports of snapping at Netanyahu, whom he has avoided criticising in public, said “No, it's not true. He's been very positive on the deal”. Axios, citing US officials had earlier claimed Trump had scolded Netanyahu during a tense phone call last week after the Israeli leader dismissed Hamas’s initial response to the US proposal as “nothing to celebrate.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-threatens-to-bomb-iran-again-says-us-won-t-wait-so-long-this-time-watch-1759718545235">Trump threatens to bomb Iran again, says US ‘won’t wait so long this time’. Watch!</a><h2>Trump warns Hamas</h2>According to The Times of Israel, Trump was asked about the impending peace deal and whether he had any red lines for Hamas in the latest round of talks in Egypt. He confirmed that he could back out of a ceasefire unless "certain conditions" are met.“If certain things aren’t met, we’re not going to do it,” he said, adding that “Hamas has been agreeing to things that are very important,” without elaborating.However, he insisted that he was “pretty sure” a ceasefire and hostage release deal would be reached soon, while describing Hamas as having been “fine” recently.“I think we're doing very well. Hamas has been agreeing to things that are very important,” Trump said, adding, "They've been trying to have a deal with Gaza literally for centuries".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-living-nostradamus-warns-of-imminent-crisis-makes-chilling-prophecy-about-trump-s-plans-for-us-military-1759738646707">‘Living Nostradamus’ warns of 'imminent crisis,' makes chilling prophecy about Trump's plans for US military</a><h2>Will Hamas release hostages on the Oct 7 attack anniversary?</h2>Trump was asked whether hostages could be released on Tuesday, the second anniversary of Hamas’s October 7 attack that triggered the ongoing war, but declined to specify a timeline for the deal or the hostage release. &nbsp;He, however, said he has been in touch with families of Israeli hostages, claiming they were “so happy” about the progress. “One said, ‘I can’t breathe,’” he added.“The people of Israel want this to happen,” Trump said, pointing to mass protests in Israel demanding a hostage deal and an end to the war, often in defiance of Netanyahu’s stance.

US President Donald Trump has dismissed reports that he told Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu to “stop being so f***ing negative” over Hamas’s partial acceptance of a US ceasefire plan. He also issued a chilling warning for Hamas. All you need to know.

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Oct 6) denied reports that he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “stop being so f***ing negative” and “take the win” after Hamas partially accepted Washington’s proposal to end the Gaza war. Talking to reporters in the Oval Office, the POTUS, when asked about reports of snapping at Netanyahu, whom he has avoided criticising in public, said “No, it's not true. He's been very positive on the deal”. Axios, citing US officials had earlier claimed Trump had scolded Netanyahu during a tense phone call last week after the Israeli leader dismissed Hamas’s initial response to the US proposal as “nothing to celebrate.” Also read | Trump threatens to bomb Iran again, says US ‘won’t wait so long this time’. Watch! Trump warns Hamas According to The Times of Israel, Trump was asked about the impending peace deal and whether he had any red lines for Hamas in the latest round of talks in Egypt. He confirmed that he could back out of a ceasefire unless "certain conditions" are met. “If certain things aren’t met, we’re not going to do it,” he said, adding that “Hamas has been agreeing to things that are very important,” without elaborating. However, he insisted that he was “pretty sure” a ceasefire and hostage release deal would be reached soon, while describing Hamas as having been “fine” recently. “I think we're doing very well. Hamas has been agreeing to things that are very important,” Trump said, adding, "They've been trying to have a deal with Gaza literally for centuries". Also read | ‘Living Nostradamus’ warns of 'imminent crisis,' makes chilling prophecy about Trump's plans for US military Will Hamas release hostages on the Oct 7 attack anniversary? Trump was asked whether hostages could be released on Tuesday, the second anniversary of Hamas’s October 7 attack that triggered the ongoing war, but declined to specify a timeline for the deal or the hostage release. He, however, said he has been in touch with families of Israeli hostages, claiming they were “so happy” about the progress. “One said, ‘I can’t breathe,’” he added. “The people of Israel want this to happen,” Trump said, pointing to mass protests in Israel demanding a hostage deal and an end to the war, often in defiance of Netanyahu’s stance.

US President Donald Trump has dismissed reports that he told Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu to “stop being so f***ing negative” over Hamas’s partial acceptance of a US ceasefire plan. He also issued a chilling warning to Hamas. All you need to know.

Trump denies telling Netanyahu to stop being so 'f***ing negative' on Gaza deal, warns Hamas 'if...'

US President Donald Trump's tariff treatment has now hit the trucks being imported into the country. Trump announced on Monday (Oct 6) that the medium and heavy-duty trucks will attract extra import duty from November 1. He had announced earlier that the tariff on trucks would start from October 1, but now the policy will come into effect from next month. Ever since Trump began his second term of presidency in January earlier this year, Trump has been bullish on imposing tariffs on the US trade partners as well as commodities imported to the country as his way of restoring balance in the US economy.<h2>What did Trump say about the tariff on trucks?</h2>The US President, on his Truth Social account, wrote: "Beginning November 1st, 2025, all medium and heavy-duty trucks coming into the United States from other countries will be tariffed at the rate of 25%. Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Thank you for your attention to this matter." The US mostly imports trucks from neighbouring Canada and Mexico with which it has a trade agreement in place already.

After countries, Trump tariffs trucks entering US from November 1

<h2>How many trucks does the US buy, and what are they used for?</h2>According to the US Department of Commerce, the country bought 245,764 medium and heavy-duty trucks in the previous year, the majority of which came from Canada and Mexico. The total value of these trucks was $20.1 billion, $4.5 billion from Canada and $15.6 billion from Mexico.In the US automotive market, themedium and heavy-duty trucks only account for five per cent of the total vehicles but the US still accounts for nearly 80 per cent demand of these trucks in North America, as reported by S&amp;P Global.The trucks are defined as medium and heavy as per their gross weight. A medium truck weighs between 14,000-33,000 pounds while any truck above gross weight of 33,000 classifies as a heavy truck. They are largely used for logistics, construction and waste management in the country.

According to the US Department of Commerce, the country bought 245,764 medium and heavy-duty trucks in the previous year, the majority of which came from Canada and Mexico. The total value of these trucks was $20.1 billion, $4.5 billion from Canada and $15.6 billion from Mexico.

US President Donald Trump's tariff treatment has now hit the trucks being imported into the country. Trump announced on Monday (Oct 6) that the medium and heavy-duty trucks will attract extra import duty from November 1. He had announced earlier that the tariff on trucks would start from October 1, but now the policy will come into effect from next month. Ever since Trump began his second term of presidency in January earlier this year, Trump has been bullish on imposing tariffs on the US trade partners as well as commodities imported to the country as his way of restoring balance in the US economy. What did Trump say about the tariff on trucks? The US President, on his Truth Social account, wrote: "Beginning November 1st, 2025, all medium and heavy-duty trucks coming into the United States from other countries will be tariffed at the rate of 25%. Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Thank you for your attention to this matter." The US mostly imports trucks from neighbouring Canada and Mexico with which it has a trade agreement in place already.

According to the US Department of Commerce, the country bought 245,764 medium and heavy-duty trucks in the previous year, the majority of which came from Canada and Mexico. The total value of these trucks was $20.1 billion, $4.5 billion from Canada and $15.6 billion from Mexico.

Trump announces '25% tariff on medium and heavy-duty trucks' entering US from November 1

President Donald Trump has ordered the deployment of US troops to Portland, Oregon, authorising use of "full force" if needed, to suppress protests targeting immigration detention centres.


Protests Erupt in Oregon Against Donald Trump's Immigration Crackdown

The “Living Nostradamus”, a self-proclaimed psychic, has warned of a major geopolitical realignment following what he called an “unprecedented” military gathering in the United States this week. Athos Salomé aka Living Nostradamus, a 39-year-old from Brazil, who has gained notoriety for claiming to predict the pandemic, Queen Elizabeth II’s death, and Microsoft’s global outage, said the high-level meeting of top US generals “revealed an imminent crisis or strategic urgency.” His prediction comes as US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth convened around 800 senior officers at the Quantico military base in Virginia on Tuesday.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-threatens-to-bomb-iran-again-says-us-won-t-wait-so-long-this-time-watch-1759718545235">Trump threatens to bomb Iran again, says US ‘won’t wait so long this time’. Watch!</a><h2>Living Nostradamus predicts…</h2>Speaking to Daily Mail US, Salomé claimed the event “was not a routine meeting but a test of loyalty,” warning that “those who resist may fall.” He predicted a “mass purge” inside the Pentagon involving “forced retirements, silent dismissals, and strategic replacements.”According to him, the shift will push the US toward a “continental fortress” strategy — focusing on domestic defence and the Western Hemisphere instead of global interventions in the Middle East, Europe, and Asia.President Donald Trump was also present at the massive event. Describing his attendance as “a symbolic show of absolute power over the Pentagon,” Salomé called the gathering as “the first public rehearsal of collective submission by the military elite.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ice-turns-arrest-into-meme-mocks-detainee-in-bizarre-ride-of-shame-video-outrage-erupts-as-white-house-reposts-video-watch-1759732361629">ICE turns arrest into meme; mocks detainee in bizarre ‘ride of shame’ video — outrage erupts as White House reposts video. Watch!</a><h2>'Prepare for war': What happened at Hegseth's military generals' meet</h2>At the massive gathering of military generals, Trump's Secretary of War Hegseth reportedly urged America's highest-ranking military officers to “prepare for war”. While taking a dig at Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programmes, he also announced a return to tougher fitness standards, saying there would be “no more DEI, dudes in dresses, or gender delusion.”Hegseth told attendees that military training would again become “scary, tough, and disciplined,” arguing that the armed forces had been weakened by “wokeness.” He insisted that physical standards needed to be gender neutral but said that "If women can make it, excellent, if they cannot, then so be it ... it will also mean that weak men won't qualify. This is combat".The Living Nostradamus has warned that the meeting could deepen internal divides within the armed forces and unsettle US allies abroad. Allies may fear a retreat from international commitments, while rivals could read this as either weakness or hardening, he said.Salomé suggested the coming months could see “discreet purges,” new command structures, and the rollout of a revised National Defense Strategy that consolidates Trump and Hegseth’s control over the military establishment.

Brazilian psychic Athos Salomé, dubbed the “Living Nostradamus,” has made a chilling prophecy about US President Donald Trump and the US military after what he called an “unprecedented” generals’ meet in Virginia.

The “Living Nostradamus”, a self-proclaimed psychic, has warned of a major geopolitical realignment following what he called an “unprecedented” military gathering in the United States this week. Athos Salomé aka Living Nostradamus, a 39-year-old from Brazil, who has gained notoriety for claiming to predict the pandemic, Queen Elizabeth II’s death, and Microsoft’s global outage, said the high-level meeting of top US generals “revealed an imminent crisis or strategic urgency.” His prediction comes as US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth convened around 800 senior officers at the Quantico military base in Virginia on Tuesday. Also read | Trump threatens to bomb Iran again, says US ‘won’t wait so long this time’. Watch! Living Nostradamus predicts… Speaking to Daily Mail US, Salomé claimed the event “was not a routine meeting but a test of loyalty,” warning that “those who resist may fall.” He predicted a “mass purge” inside the Pentagon involving “forced retirements, silent dismissals, and strategic replacements.” According to him, the shift will push the US toward a “continental fortress” strategy — focusing on domestic defence and the Western Hemisphere instead of global interventions in the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. President Donald Trump was also present at the massive event. Describing his attendance as “a symbolic show of absolute power over the Pentagon,” Salomé called the gathering as “the first public rehearsal of collective submission by the military elite.” Also read | ICE turns arrest into meme; mocks detainee in bizarre ‘ride of shame’ video — outrage erupts as White House reposts video. Watch! 'Prepare for war': What happened at Hegseth's military generals' meet At the massive gathering of military generals, Trump's Secretary of War Hegseth reportedly urged America's highest-ranking military officers to “prepare for war”. While taking a dig at Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programmes, he also announced a return to tougher fitness standards, saying there would be “no more DEI, dudes in dresses, or gender delusion.” Hegseth told attendees that military training would again become “scary, tough, and disciplined,” arguing that the armed forces had been weakened by “wokeness.” He insisted that physical standards needed to be gender neutral but said that "If women can make it, excellent, if they cannot, then so be it ... it will also mean that weak men won't qualify. This is combat". The Living Nostradamus has warned that the meeting could deepen internal divides within the armed forces and unsettle US allies abroad. Allies may fear a retreat from international commitments, while rivals could read this as either weakness or hardening, he said. Salomé suggested the coming months could see “discreet purges,” new command structures, and the rollout of a revised National Defense Strategy that consolidates Trump and Hegseth’s control over the military establishment.

Brazilian psychic Athos Salomé, dubbed the “Living Nostradamus,” has made a chilling prophecy about US President Donald Trump and the US military after what he called an “unprecedented” generals’ meet in Virginia.

‘Living Nostradamus’ warns of 'imminent crisis,' makes chilling prophecy about Trump's plans for US military

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has ignited controversy after posting a video showing agents hauling away a detainee in Portland while blasting a song mocking the detainee. The clip, posted Sunday on X, shows a handcuffed person lying face down on a flatbed cart as officers roll them away. ICE captioned it, “PORTLAND — Refuse to walk? We’ll give you a ride,” as Chamillionaire’s 2000s hit Ridin' plays. The video quickly went viral, drawing cheers from Trump loyalists and backlash from critics who accused the agency of dehumanising detainees.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-threatens-to-bomb-iran-again-says-us-won-t-wait-so-long-this-time-watch-1759718545235">Trump threatens to bomb Iran again, says US ‘won’t wait so long this time’. Watch!</a><h2>What happened?</h2>In downtown Portland, an ICE facility has been the site of nightly confrontations between federal agents and protesters since President Donald Trump announced troop deployments to what he called the “war-ravaged” city. The move was halted on Saturday by Trump-appointed Judge Karin Immergut. Blocking the deployment, she ruled that “this is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law.” However, the court order didn’t stop MAGA influencers from celebrating ICE’s stunt.Watch the video here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">PORTLAND — Refuse to walk? We’ll give you a ride. <a href="https://t.co/RibmhrTLSa">pic.twitter.com/RibmhrTLSa</a>&mdash; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (@ICEgov) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICEgov/status/1974865365252321479?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Lauding ICE's now-viral video, far-right activist Laura Loomer wrote, “I love this account.” Conservative personality Gunther Eagleman added, “LOL! I voted for this.” Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier even quipped, “Florida will never become Portland, but this new technique is noted.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I love this account. <a href="https://t.co/bz56sYxg9U">https://t.co/bz56sYxg9U</a>— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) <a href="https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1974888134170296820?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Others egged on the barrage of comments with suggestions, including transporting those detained in a 'Silence of the Lambs' way.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">It's a good start, but you gotta up your game. <a href="https://t.co/8AjZI6wrxt">pic.twitter.com/8AjZI6wrxt</a>— Jasconius (@JasconiusGames) <a href="https://twitter.com/JasconiusGames/status/1974883323291033829?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/pope-blesses-chunk-of-ice-on-camera-sparks-ridicule-but-this-is-why-he-did-it-1759382204019">Video: Pope blesses chunk of ice on camera, sparks ridicule — but why did he do it?</a><h2>ICE video outrage</h2>The ICE video was later reposted by the official White House account on X — further fueling outrage.Liberal commentators called the video “propaganda.” Journalist Marcy Wheeler wrote, “Why is ICE still making propaganda during a government shutdown?” Advocacy group Debt Collective demanded the agency be “completely uprooted.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">We have to completely uproot and abolish this agency.<a href="https://t.co/KEoxDjeSC7">https://t.co/KEoxDjeSC7</a>— The Debt Collective 🟥 (@StrikeDebt) <a href="https://twitter.com/StrikeDebt/status/1966618693674181076?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 12, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"Let them post their sick videos, all evidence of human rights violations," posted another.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Let them post their sick videos, all evidence of human rights violations.— Sugar & Spite (@KittnHasClaws) <a href="https://twitter.com/KittnHasClaws/status/1974876334028722485?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Former Democratic campaign staffer Timothy Bellman said, “It’s a choice to do this, and film it, and post it with music. That’s what makes it worse.” Calling the video "repulsive", one user remarked, "And we wonder why the United States has been placed on the CIVICUS Monitor Watchlist".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">This is repulsive. And we wonder why the United States has been placed on the CIVICUS Monitor Watchlist. The move comes amid President Donald Trump’s “assault on democratic norms and global cooperation,” said CIVICUS—a global alliance and network of civil society groups,…— Dianne Callahan (@DianneCallaha16) <a href="https://twitter.com/DianneCallaha16/status/1974904722906599436?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Meanwhile, netizens pointed out that the person transported unceremoniously by ICE was "an American citizen with rights? No?".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I’m sorry. I believe that’s an American citizen with rights? No?— Girl from Mars (@GirlFromMars_OG) <a href="https://twitter.com/GirlFromMars_OG/status/1974872008564609283?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ICE and its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), have come under repeated fire for using memes and pop culture in posts about immigration raids. Last month, DHS was forced to pull a Pokémon-themed video after the company said it hadn’t given permission.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is under fire after posting a video showing agents rolling away a detainee in Portland while blasting Chamillionaire’s “Ridin’.” The clip, captioned “Refuse to walk? We’ll give you a ride,” sparked outrage. All you need to know.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has ignited controversy after posting a video showing agents hauling away a detainee in Portland while blasting a song mocking the detainee. The clip, posted Sunday on X, shows a handcuffed person lying face down on a flatbed cart as officers roll them away. ICE captioned it, “PORTLAND — Refuse to walk? We’ll give you a ride,” as Chamillionaire’s 2000s hit Ridin' plays. The video quickly went viral, drawing cheers from Trump loyalists and backlash from critics who accused the agency of dehumanising detainees. Also read | Trump threatens to bomb Iran again, says US ‘won’t wait so long this time’. Watch! What happened? In downtown Portland, an ICE facility has been the site of nightly confrontations between federal agents and protesters since President Donald Trump announced troop deployments to what he called the “war-ravaged” city. The move was halted on Saturday by Trump-appointed Judge Karin Immergut. Blocking the deployment, she ruled that “this is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law.” However, the court order didn’t stop MAGA influencers from celebrating ICE’s stunt. Watch the video here:

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is under fire after posting a video showing agents rolling away a detainee in Portland while blasting Chamillionaire’s “Ridin’.” The clip, captioned “Refuse to walk? We’ll give you a ride,” sparked outrage. All you need to know.

ICE turns arrest into meme; mocks detainee in bizarre ‘ride of shame’ video — outrage erupts as White House reposts video. Watch!

A federal judge on Sunday (October 5) issued a temporary order blocking the Trump administration from sending any National Guard troops to Oregon, halting plans to deploy forces from California as well. The states of California and Oregon had jointly sought the restraining order after the president authorised the movement of California Guard personnel to Oregon earlier in the day. A day before, the same judge had paused the administration’s attempt to send Oregon’s own Guard members to Portland.&nbsp;According to the Pentagon, around 200 federalised troops from the California National Guard—previously stationed in the Los Angeles area—were being redirected to Portland. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek said roughly half of them had already arrived by Saturday, with the remainder expected on Sunday. She added that the state received no formal communication from federal authorities regarding the move.&nbsp;Initially, the states’ legal request focused solely on preventing California troops from being transferred. However, after a memo from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revealed plans to mobilize as many as 400 Texas National Guard members for deployment to Oregon, Illinois, and possibly other locations, the states expanded their appeal to cover all Guard units. Texas Governor Greg Abbott confirmed on X that he had approved the deployment, saying the federal government must either fully protect its personnel or “get out of the way and let Texas Guard do it.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-are-you-alright-indian-origin-motel-manager-shot-dead-in-pittsburgh-after-confrontation-in-parking-lot-1759723569074">'Are you alright?': Indian-origin motel manager shot dead in Pittsburgh after confrontation in parking lot</a>&nbsp;The White House on Sunday acknowledged that troops from the California National Guard had been sent to Oregon. “President Trump acted within his legal powers to safeguard federal property and personnel in Portland after a series of violent disturbances and assaults on law enforcement,” said White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson. Taking a swipe at California Governor Gavin Newsom, she added, “It’s time he stood with law-abiding Americans instead of siding with criminals tearing down Portland and other cities.”&nbsp;Oregon Governor Tina Kotek, a Democrat, confirmed that 101 federalised California National Guard members had landed in the state the previous night and that additional personnel were expected to arrive later in the day. She sharply criticised the deployment, calling it an attempt to sidestep a federal judge’s earlier ruling blocking such action. “The circumstances remain unchanged — there is no justification for a military presence in Oregon,” Kotek said. “There is no insurrection in Portland, no national security threat. Oregon is our home, not a battlefield. People here have the right to peacefully protest the Trump Administration’s unlawful actions.”

Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from sending National Guards troops to Oregon

A federal judge on Sunday (October 5) issued a temporary order blocking the Trump administration from sending any National Guard troops to Oregon, halting plans to deploy forces from California as well. The states of California and Oregon had jointly sought the restraining order after the president authorised the movement of California Guard personnel to Oregon earlier in the day. A day before, the same judge had paused the administration’s attempt to send Oregon’s own Guard members to Portland. According to the Pentagon, around 200 federalised troops from the California National Guard—previously stationed in the Los Angeles area—were being redirected to Portland. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek said roughly half of them had already arrived by Saturday, with the remainder expected on Sunday. She added that the state received no formal communication from federal authorities regarding the move. Initially, the states’ legal request focused solely on preventing California troops from being transferred. However, after a memo from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revealed plans to mobilize as many as 400 Texas National Guard members for deployment to Oregon, Illinois, and possibly other locations, the states expanded their appeal to cover all Guard units. Texas Governor Greg Abbott confirmed on X that he had approved the deployment, saying the federal government must either fully protect its personnel or “get out of the way and let Texas Guard do it.” Also Read: 'Are you alright?': Indian-origin motel manager shot dead in Pittsburgh after confrontation in parking lot The White House on Sunday acknowledged that troops from the California National Guard had been sent to Oregon. “President Trump acted within his legal powers to safeguard federal property and personnel in Portland after a series of violent disturbances and assaults on law enforcement,” said White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson. Taking a swipe at California Governor Gavin Newsom, she added, “It’s time he stood with law-abiding Americans instead of siding with criminals tearing down Portland and other cities.” Oregon Governor Tina Kotek, a Democrat, confirmed that 101 federalised California National Guard members had landed in the state the previous night and that additional personnel were expected to arrive later in the day. She sharply criticised the deployment, calling it an attempt to sidestep a federal judge’s earlier ruling blocking such action. “The circumstances remain unchanged — there is no justification for a military presence in Oregon,” Kotek said. “There is no insurrection in Portland, no national security threat. Oregon is our home, not a battlefield. People here have the right to peacefully protest the Trump Administration’s unlawful actions.”

A federal judge has blocked Trump admin from sending National Guards to Oregon; California troops already partly deployed despite legal pushback from states

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Oct 5) warned that he would bomb Iran again if the country restarts its nuclear programme, saying the United States “won’t wait so long this time.” Speaking at a Navy Day event at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia, Trump referenced the June 22 US airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, calling them “perfectly executed.” Trump alleged that Iran was just a month away from having a nuclear weapon when the US struck its nuclear facilities, and vowed that he would order another strike if Tehran attempts to restart its nuclear programme.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-israel-agreed-to-withdrawal-line-ceasefire-to-follow-once-hamas-confirms-1759631344689">Trump says Israel agreed to ‘withdrawal line,’ ceasefire to follow once Hamas confirms</a><h2>Trump hails US attack on Iran</h2>Talking about the June 22 'Operation Midnight Hammer' in which the US used "bunker buster" bombs to strike three Iranian nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Those strikes followed Israel's air campaign that began on June 13, targeting a dozen Iranian military and nuclear-related sites.“The B2s, what they did. Those beautiful flying wings, what they did, they hit every single target. And just in case, we shot 30 Tomahawks out of a submarine,” Trump told sailors at Naval Station Norfolk at a celebration of the US Navy’s 250th birthday.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">‘We’re NOT going to wait so long’ to hit Iran again B2 pilots had been training for 22 YEARS for ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’, Trump adds <a href="https://t.co/0gaXwqvQ0l">https://t.co/0gaXwqvQ0l</a> <a href="https://t.co/tJO0QadFxY">pic.twitter.com/tJO0QadFxY</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1974941710552908053?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The president claimed that back in June, Iran was going to have a nuclear weapon “within a month,” despite US intelligence assessments at the time determining that indicating Tehran was not pursuing a bomb.“They were going to have a nuclear weapon within a month,” Trump said. “And now they can start the operation all over again, but I hope they don’t because we’ll have to take care of that too if they do, I let them know that. You want to do that, it’s fine, but we’re going to take care of that and we’re not going to wait so long.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/pope-blesses-chunk-of-ice-on-camera-sparks-ridicule-but-this-is-why-he-did-it-1759382204019">Video: Pope blesses chunk of ice on camera, sparks ridicule — but why did he do it?</a><h2>Operation Midnight Hammer: 22 years in making</h2>Trump also claimed B-2 pilots told him that US planners had been preparing for such an operation for 22 years, but that no president before him had the guts to do it.In a September interview, he previously told the Daily Caller that he ordered the June strikes on behalf of Israel, boasting that “nobody has done more for Israel than I have, including the recent attacks with Iran, wiping that thing out.”The remarks come amid growing signs of another confrontation with Tehran. The Trump administration has been pressing Iran to abandon its uranium enrichment and curb its ballistic missile program — demands Tehran has rejected outright. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei recently reiterated his prohibition on the development of nuclear weapons but vowed not to give up the country’s civilian nuclear program, calling it a matter of national dignity.

US President Trump warned Sunday he would bomb Iran again if it restarts its nuclear program, citing the June 22 US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites as “perfectly executed.” He claimed Iran was a month from a bomb back then, and vowed not to wait so long next time.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Oct 5) warned that he would bomb Iran again if the country restarts its nuclear programme, saying the United States “won’t wait so long this time.” Speaking at a Navy Day event at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia, Trump referenced the June 22 US airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, calling them “perfectly executed.” Trump alleged that Iran was just a month away from having a nuclear weapon when the US struck its nuclear facilities, and vowed that he would order another strike if Tehran attempts to restart its nuclear programme. Also read | Trump says Israel agreed to ‘withdrawal line,’ ceasefire to follow once Hamas confirms Trump hails US attack on Iran Talking about the June 22 'Operation Midnight Hammer' in which the US used "bunker buster" bombs to strike three Iranian nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Those strikes followed Israel's air campaign that began on June 13, targeting a dozen Iranian military and nuclear-related sites. “The B2s, what they did. Those beautiful flying wings, what they did, they hit every single target. And just in case, we shot 30 Tomahawks out of a submarine,” Trump told sailors at Naval Station Norfolk at a celebration of the US Navy’s 250th birthday.

US President Trump warned Sunday he would bomb Iran again if it restarts its nuclear program, citing the June 22 US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites as “perfectly executed.” He claimed Iran was a month from a bomb back then, and vowed not to wait so long next time.

Trump threatens to bomb Iran again, says US ‘won’t wait so long this time’. Watch!

US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Oct 4) said that Israel has agreed to an initial "withdrawal line" as part of his plan to end the Gaza war, adding that a ceasefire will come into effect once Hamas confirms the arrangement. Taking to Truth Social, Trump wrote, "After negotiations, Israel has agreed to the initial withdrawal line, which we have shown to and shared with Hamas." He added that once Hamas confirms, the ceasefire will go into force "IMMEDIATELY". The POTUS also said that with this the world was getting closer to the "end of this 3,000 YEAR CATASTROPHE".<h2>Hostage-prisoner exchange soon</h2>“When Hamas confirms, the Ceasefire will be IMMEDIATELY effective, the Hostages and Prisoner Exchange will begin, and we will create the conditions for the next phase of withdrawal, which will bring us close to the end of this 3,000 YEAR CATASTROPHE,” said Trump in his Truth Social post signing off in his signature style, “Thank you for your attention to this matter and, STAY TUNED!”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-federal-agent-shoots-motorist-in-chicago-hours-after-court-blocks-trump-s-troop-order-1759627460851">US federal agent shoots woman in Chicago hours after court blocks Trump’s troop order</a>&nbsp;Earlier in the day, White House Press Secretary Sarah Matthews reposted a video of Trump thanking regional partners for supporting his peace plan.&nbsp;I want to thank the countries that helped me put this together. Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and so many others. So many people fought so hard. This is a big day. We'll see how it all turns out,” Trump said in the video. “We have to get the final word down in concrete. Very importantly, I look forward to having the hostages come home to their parents and having some of the hostages, unfortunately, you know the condition they're in, come home likewise to their parents because their parents wanted them just as much as though that young man or young woman were alive.”&nbsp;Calling the development “unprecedented,” Trump praised what he described as rare unity among Middle Eastern nations. “Everybody was unified in wanting this war to end and seeing peace in the Middle East. And we're very close to achieving that. Thank you all, and everybody will be treated fairly,” he said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/pope-blesses-chunk-of-ice-on-camera-sparks-ridicule-but-this-is-why-he-did-it-1759382204019">Video: Pope blesses chunk of ice on camera, sparks ridicule — but why did he do it?</a><h2>When will the Gaza ceasefire plan be put into motion?</h2>According to The Times of Israel, a senior Israeli delegation will travel to Cairo on Monday for negotiations on the implementation of Trump’s ceasefire plan. The delegation will include Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, hostage affairs coordinator Gal Hirsch, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s foreign policy adviser Ophir Falk, and senior officials from the Shin Bet and Mossad intelligence agencies.&nbsp;Negotiations in Egypt are expected to focus on the full release of hostages held by Hamas and other groups in Gaza, along with the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israel — a key element of Trump’s proposal to end the conflict.

Trump says Israel has agreed to an initial Gaza withdrawal line as part of his ceasefire plan, calling it a step toward ending a “3,000-year catastrophe.” Hamas’ confirmation would lead to an immediate truce and hostage-prisoner exchange, with talks set to continue in Cairo on Monday.

US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Oct 4) said that Israel has agreed to an initial "withdrawal line" as part of his plan to end the Gaza war, adding that a ceasefire will come into effect once Hamas confirms the arrangement. Taking to Truth Social, Trump wrote, "After negotiations, Israel has agreed to the initial withdrawal line, which we have shown to and shared with Hamas." He added that once Hamas confirms, the ceasefire will go into force "IMMEDIATELY". The POTUS also said that with this the world was getting closer to the "end of this 3,000 YEAR CATASTROPHE". Hostage-prisoner exchange soon “When Hamas confirms, the Ceasefire will be IMMEDIATELY effective, the Hostages and Prisoner Exchange will begin, and we will create the conditions for the next phase of withdrawal, which will bring us close to the end of this 3,000 YEAR CATASTROPHE,” said Trump in his Truth Social post signing off in his signature style, “Thank you for your attention to this matter and, STAY TUNED!” Also read | US federal agent shoots woman in Chicago hours after court blocks Trump’s troop order Earlier in the day, White House Press Secretary Sarah Matthews reposted a video of Trump thanking regional partners for supporting his peace plan. I want to thank the countries that helped me put this together. Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and so many others. So many people fought so hard. This is a big day. We'll see how it all turns out,” Trump said in the video. “We have to get the final word down in concrete. Very importantly, I look forward to having the hostages come home to their parents and having some of the hostages, unfortunately, you know the condition they're in, come home likewise to their parents because their parents wanted them just as much as though that young man or young woman were alive.” Calling the development “unprecedented,” Trump praised what he described as rare unity among Middle Eastern nations. “Everybody was unified in wanting this war to end and seeing peace in the Middle East. And we're very close to achieving that. Thank you all, and everybody will be treated fairly,” he said. Also read | Video: Pope blesses chunk of ice on camera, sparks ridicule — but why did he do it? When will the Gaza ceasefire plan be put into motion? According to The Times of Israel, a senior Israeli delegation will travel to Cairo on Monday for negotiations on the implementation of Trump’s ceasefire plan. The delegation will include Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, hostage affairs coordinator Gal Hirsch, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s foreign policy adviser Ophir Falk, and senior officials from the Shin Bet and Mossad intelligence agencies. Negotiations in Egypt are expected to focus on the full release of hostages held by Hamas and other groups in Gaza, along with the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israel — a key element of Trump’s proposal to end the conflict.

Trump says Israel has agreed to an initial Gaza withdrawal line as part of his ceasefire plan, calling it a step toward ending a “3,000-year catastrophe.” Hamas’ confirmation would lead to an immediate truce and hostage-prisoner exchange, with talks set to continue in Cairo on Monday.

Trump says Israel agreed to ‘withdrawal line,’ ceasefire to follow once Hamas confirms

A federal agent shot a motorist in Chicago on Saturday, just hours after a judge blocked President Donald Trump’s attempt to deploy military troops in Portland, Oregon. This happened amid an increasingly tense stand-off between Washington and Democratic-run cities. Both incidents come amid the Trump administration’s hardline law-and-order push, marked by mass deportation raids and heavily armed operations in cities such as Los Angeles and Washington. The White House insists these measures are necessary to combat rising crime. Critics, however, say they’re politically driven displays of force.<h2>US federal agent shoots motorist: What happened?</h2>On Saturday (Oct 4) morning, a motorist was shot after agents were "boxed in by 10 cars," said the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The driver allegedly rammed her vehicle into the law enforcement vehicle, forcing agents to exit their car. DHS official Tricia McLaughlin said the driver, armed with a semi-automatic weapon, was shot as “Law enforcement was forced to deploy their weapons and fire defensive shots at an armed US citizen.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-israel-agreed-to-withdrawal-line-ceasefire-to-follow-once-hamas-confirms-1759631344689">Trump says Israel agreed to ‘withdrawal line,’ ceasefire to follow once Hamas confirms</a>The unidentified motorist reportedly "drove herself to the hospital to get care for wounds." DHS accused Chicago police of "leaving the shooting scene," with officers refusing "to assist us in securing the area." Chicago police, however, told Fox 32 they had responded but were not involved in the federal operation or its investigation. "Federal authorities are investigating this shooting."<h2>Judge blocks Trump’s Portland troop order</h2>In her ruling, US District Judge Karin Immergut rejected Trump’s claim that the situation in Portland amounted to a “rebellion,” requiring federal troops. “Defendants presented evidence of sporadic violence against federal officers and property damage to a federal building,” she wrote, adding that they failed to demonstrate that “those episodes of violence were part of an organised attempt to overthrow the government as a whole.”Immergut said regular law enforcement was capable of handling unrest in the city, calling the administration’s justification “untethered to the facts.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/pope-blesses-chunk-of-ice-on-camera-sparks-ridicule-but-this-is-why-he-did-it-1759382204019">Video: Pope blesses chunk of ice on camera, sparks ridicule — but why did he do it?</a>Oregon Senator Ron Wyden praised the decision, saying it confirmed what residents already believed: “We don't need or want Donald Trump to provoke violence by deploying federal troops in our state.”In Illinois, tensions escalated further after Governor JB Pritzker accused Washington of trying to override his authority. “The Trump administration's Department of War gave me an ultimatum: call up your troops, or we will,” Pritzker said on X. “It is absolutely outrageous and un-American to demand a Governor send military troops within our own borders and against our will.” &nbsp;

A federal agent shot a motorist in Chicago just hours after a judge blocked Trump’s bid to deploy troops in Portland. Here's what happened.

A federal agent shot a motorist in Chicago on Saturday, just hours after a judge blocked President Donald Trump’s attempt to deploy military troops in Portland, Oregon. This happened amid an increasingly tense stand-off between Washington and Democratic-run cities. Both incidents come amid the Trump administration’s hardline law-and-order push, marked by mass deportation raids and heavily armed operations in cities such as Los Angeles and Washington. The White House insists these measures are necessary to combat rising crime. Critics, however, say they’re politically driven displays of force. US federal agent shoots motorist: What happened? On Saturday (Oct 4) morning, a motorist was shot after agents were "boxed in by 10 cars," said the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The driver allegedly rammed her vehicle into the law enforcement vehicle, forcing agents to exit their car. DHS official Tricia McLaughlin said the driver, armed with a semi-automatic weapon, was shot as “Law enforcement was forced to deploy their weapons and fire defensive shots at an armed US citizen.” Also read | Trump says Israel agreed to ‘withdrawal line,’ ceasefire to follow once Hamas confirms The unidentified motorist reportedly "drove herself to the hospital to get care for wounds." DHS accused Chicago police of "leaving the shooting scene," with officers refusing "to assist us in securing the area." Chicago police, however, told Fox 32 they had responded but were not involved in the federal operation or its investigation. "Federal authorities are investigating this shooting." Judge blocks Trump’s Portland troop order In her ruling, US District Judge Karin Immergut rejected Trump’s claim that the situation in Portland amounted to a “rebellion,” requiring federal troops. “Defendants presented evidence of sporadic violence against federal officers and property damage to a federal building,” she wrote, adding that they failed to demonstrate that “those episodes of violence were part of an organised attempt to overthrow the government as a whole.” Immergut said regular law enforcement was capable of handling unrest in the city, calling the administration’s justification “untethered to the facts.” Also read | Video: Pope blesses chunk of ice on camera, sparks ridicule — but why did he do it? Oregon Senator Ron Wyden praised the decision, saying it confirmed what residents already believed: “We don't need or want Donald Trump to provoke violence by deploying federal troops in our state.” In Illinois, tensions escalated further after Governor JB Pritzker accused Washington of trying to override his authority. “The Trump administration's Department of War gave me an ultimatum: call up your troops, or we will,” Pritzker said on X. “It is absolutely outrageous and un-American to demand a Governor send military troops within our own borders and against our will.”

A federal agent shot a motorist in Chicago just hours after a judge blocked Trump’s bid to deploy troops in Portland. Here's what happened.

US federal agent shoots woman in Chicago hours after court blocks Trump’s troop order

White House Secretary Karoline Leavitt was visibly triggered on Wednesday when a NYT reporter questioned Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner's involvement in the Middle East deals. New York Times reporter McCreesh asked Leavitt, “How did the White House decide that it is appropriate for Jared Kushner to be working on matters that involve Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, three countries that combined have given him more than $2.5 billion for his investment firm?”This angered Karoline Leavitt; she snapped, “I think it’s frankly despicable that you’re trying to suggest that it’s inappropriate for Jared Kushner." She framed that Jared is ‘widely respected around the world.’ She, for a minute, heaped praises on him, for devoting his time and energy to achieving peace in the Middle East.&nbsp;<h2>Who is Jared Kushner?</h2>Jared Kushner, a real estate developer, investor, and former senior White House advisor, is married to US President Donald Trump's daughter, Ivanka Trump. Their relationship, which Ivanka described as the ‘best deal we ever made’. Jared Kushner was born in an orthodox Jewish family to Charles Kushner, and received his education in a Jewish school and always presented Palestinians as a security threat. Many critics termed Kushner to be ‘in bed’ with Benjamin Netanyahu. His family has a longstanding relationship with Netanyahu. His father, Charles, is a substantial donor to institutions and settlements in the occupied West Bank, such as Beit El. Netanyahu himself publicly admitted that he had known Jared since he was a boy. Kushner married Ivanka even before Donald Trump became the US President. Ivanka converted to Judaism so that Jared and his family would accept her. A decision that Ivanka described as 'a great life decision' that provided a ‘blueprint for family connectivity’.Charles Kushner was a registered donor to Trump's political campaigns; in return, Trump pardoned Charles Kushner's prison term in 2020 for tax evasion, witness tampering and illegal donations. Jared Kushner was the link between Donald Trump and AIPAC. He organised speeches and acted as a key advisor for Trump during his speeches.<h2>Why is Kushner in controversy?</h2>Kushner had made a series of controversial statements about the Israel-Palestine conflict. In 2024, Kushner suggested that Palestinians in Gaza could be relocated, and the 'waterfront property' could be used to develop a 'Riviera of the Middle East' by a so-called ‘GREAT Trust’ (Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration, and Transformation Trust). The idea was floated by Kushner and proposed by Donald Trump with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair in August 2025. The oldest trick in the US Imperialism playbook, one that has caused irreparable damage to countries like Indonesia, which is still raging in protest.Critics argue that Kushner's firm, Affinity Partners, has benefited financially from the connections he cultivated during his term in office. Kushner was a key architect of the Abraham Accords to achieve peace between Israel and Arab states, while the West claims that it is a step towards progress, but critics claim that it is a way to extend the settler footprint and manage the Palestinian conflict, either by bombing them or starving them. In September 2025, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich publicly described the devastated Gaza Strip as a "real estate bonanza" and suggested a profit-sharing arrangement with the United States.&nbsp;

Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law, faces renewed scrutiny over his Middle East investments. White House Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended him after a NYT reporter raised questions about his $2.5 billion Gulf ties.

White House Secretary Karoline Leavitt was visibly triggered on Wednesday when a NYT reporter questioned Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner's involvement in the Middle East deals. New York Times reporter McCreesh asked Leavitt, “How did the White House decide that it is appropriate for Jared Kushner to be working on matters that involve Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, three countries that combined have given him more than $2.5 billion for his investment firm?” This angered Karoline Leavitt; she snapped, “I think it’s frankly despicable that you’re trying to suggest that it’s inappropriate for Jared Kushner." She framed that Jared is ‘widely respected around the world.’ She, for a minute, heaped praises on him, for devoting his time and energy to achieving peace in the Middle East. Who is Jared Kushner? Jared Kushner, a real estate developer, investor, and former senior White House advisor, is married to US President Donald Trump's daughter, Ivanka Trump. Their relationship, which Ivanka described as the ‘best deal we ever made’. Jared Kushner was born in an orthodox Jewish family to Charles Kushner, and received his education in a Jewish school and always presented Palestinians as a security threat. Many critics termed Kushner to be ‘in bed’ with Benjamin Netanyahu. His family has a longstanding relationship with Netanyahu. His father, Charles, is a substantial donor to institutions and settlements in the occupied West Bank, such as Beit El. Netanyahu himself publicly admitted that he had known Jared since he was a boy. Kushner married Ivanka even before Donald Trump became the US President. Ivanka converted to Judaism so that Jared and his family would accept her. A decision that Ivanka described as 'a great life decision' that provided a ‘blueprint for family connectivity’. Charles Kushner was a registered donor to Trump's political campaigns; in return, Trump pardoned Charles Kushner's prison term in 2020 for tax evasion, witness tampering and illegal donations. Jared Kushner was the link between Donald Trump and AIPAC. He organised speeches and acted as a key advisor for Trump during his speeches. Why is Kushner in controversy? Kushner had made a series of controversial statements about the Israel-Palestine conflict. In 2024, Kushner suggested that Palestinians in Gaza could be relocated, and the 'waterfront property' could be used to develop a 'Riviera of the Middle East' by a so-called ‘GREAT Trust’ (Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration, and Transformation Trust). The idea was floated by Kushner and proposed by Donald Trump with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair in August 2025. The oldest trick in the US Imperialism playbook, one that has caused irreparable damage to countries like Indonesia, which is still raging in protest. Critics argue that Kushner's firm, Affinity Partners, has benefited financially from the connections he cultivated during his term in office. Kushner was a key architect of the Abraham Accords to achieve peace between Israel and Arab states, while the West claims that it is a step towards progress, but critics claim that it is a way to extend the settler footprint and manage the Palestinian conflict, either by bombing them or starving them. In September 2025, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich publicly described the devastated Gaza Strip as a "real estate bonanza" and suggested a profit-sharing arrangement with the United States.

Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law, faces renewed scrutiny over his Middle East investments. White House Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended him after a NYT reporter raised questions about his $2.5 billion Gulf ties.

Who is Jared Kushner? Karoline Leavitt snaps at NYT reporter over Jared Kushner's Middle East deals controversy

United States President Donald Trump's geographical gaffe became a topic of discussion and laughter at the European Political Community meeting in Copenhagen. Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, in the presence of French President Emmanuel Macron and Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev referred to Trump's past confusion between several Eastern European countries. While taking credit for solving wars across the world, Trump had recently referred to Armenia as Azerbaijan and boasted that he solved the war between these two countries. However, in reality, the conflict is between Armenia and Albania. Trump is known for his repeated geographical mix-ups. He once claimed to have solved the imaginary conflict between Cambodia and Armenia.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-tariffs-against-india-will-fail-may-end-up-hurting-us-economy-russian-president-vladimir-putin-1759428762707">US tariffs against India will fail, may end up hurting US economy: Russian President Vladimir Putin</a><h2>Trump becomes subject of joke</h2>During a light-hearted exchange at the European Political Community summit, Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama jokingly told French President Emmanuel Macron that he should apologise for not congratulating Albania on the peace deal that US President Donald Trump claimed to have brokered between Albania and Azerbaijan. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev was seen laughing in response. Macron, playing along with the joke, responded by apologising for the oversight.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russian-president-vladimir-putin-says-charlie-kirk-s-assassination-exposes-deep-rift-in-american-society-1759454073909">Putin says Charlie Kirk's assassination exposes 'deep rift' in American society</a><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-mocked-by-european-leaders-over-armenia-albania-mix-up-1759461752671/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-mocked-by-european-leaders-over-armenia-albania-mix-up-1759461752671/embed</a>&nbsp;“You should make an apology ... to us because you didn’t congratulate us on the peace deal that President Trump made between Albania and Azerbaijan,” Rama told Macron, as Aliyev was seen laughing. The French president replied: “I am sorry for that.”Trump has exaggerated his record of solving wars, and his administration has promoted his claims. The White House says that Trump, in his first eight months of taking office in the second term, solved seven wars - including the India-Pakistan conflict of May 2025. Trump says that he used trade to solve the war - a claim that India has categorically denied.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/does-putin-feel-like-alexander-russian-president-says-he-was-elected-but-1759427219820">Does Putin feel like Alexander? Russian president says he was elected but …</a>

Albanian PM Edi Rama joked about US President Donald Trump's geography errors at the European Political Community meeting, referencing Trump’s repeated mix-ups of Albania with Armenia. The light-hearted remark drew laughter from Macron

United States President Donald Trump's geographical gaffe became a topic of discussion and laughter at the European Political Community meeting in Copenhagen. Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, in the presence of French President Emmanuel Macron and Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev referred to Trump's past confusion between several Eastern European countries. While taking credit for solving wars across the world, Trump had recently referred to Armenia as Azerbaijan and boasted that he solved the war between these two countries. However, in reality, the conflict is between Armenia and Albania. Trump is known for his repeated geographical mix-ups. He once claimed to have solved the imaginary conflict between Cambodia and Armenia. Read More | US tariffs against India will fail, may end up hurting US economy: Russian President Vladimir Putin Trump becomes subject of joke During a light-hearted exchange at the European Political Community summit, Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama jokingly told French President Emmanuel Macron that he should apologise for not congratulating Albania on the peace deal that US President Donald Trump claimed to have brokered between Albania and Azerbaijan. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev was seen laughing in response. Macron, playing along with the joke, responded by apologising for the oversight. Read More | Putin says Charlie Kirk's assassination exposes 'deep rift' in American society https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-mocked-by-european-leaders-over-armenia-albania-mix-up-1759461752671/embed “You should make an apology ... to us because you didn’t congratulate us on the peace deal that President Trump made between Albania and Azerbaijan,” Rama told Macron, as Aliyev was seen laughing. The French president replied: “I am sorry for that.” Trump has exaggerated his record of solving wars, and his administration has promoted his claims. The White House says that Trump, in his first eight months of taking office in the second term, solved seven wars - including the India-Pakistan conflict of May 2025. Trump says that he used trade to solve the war - a claim that India has categorically denied. Read More | Does Putin feel like Alexander? Russian president says he was elected but …

Albanian PM Edi Rama joked about US President Donald Trump's geography errors at the European Political Community meeting, referencing Trump’s repeated mix-ups of Albania with Armenia. The light-hearted remark drew laughter from Macron

Trump becomes subject of joke! Albania PM mocks US president's geography errors - WATCH Macron's reaction

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

Could 'be a little nicer': Trump hails Netanyahu as ‘hero’ of Gaza ceasefire — then roasts him about…

Donald Trump Calls for New Era of Harmony in West Asia; Says Gaza Deal Opens Door to 'Rebuilding'

‘Press no longer roams free’: US media revolts against Pentagon’s gag order

Who are Ayman Odeh and Ofer? Israeli MPs ousted for disrupting Trump’s speech

Netanyahu: Trump is the greatest friend that Israel has ever had in White House

Trump declares 'war is over in Gaza' ahead of peace summit in Egypt

Trump once again accuses Biden of planting 274 FBI agents at Jan 6 Capitol riot

Who is María Corina Machado? The Nobel Peace Prize winner over Trump

From ceasefires to Accords: Can Donald Trump really win the Nobel Peace Prize?

H-1B visa: Is Trump admin preparing to make it tougher to qualify?

Will Trump win Nobel Peace Prize or surprise candidate? Here's what experts say

'They will find a reason...': Trump on whether he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize

Trump orders FBI to search for Amelia Earhart files amid government shutdown

'SICK scumbag': Pritzker claims Trump is suffering from dementia, calls him Nazi; White House hits back

Donald Trump on Bad Bunny performing at the Super Bowl: 'I don’t know who he is’

Trump’s swollen ankles reignite health rumours — talk about heaven isn’t helping

'In serious negotiations on Gaza, possibility of peace in Middle East': Trump

Was it Trump? US President answers interview questions...via text

Jane Goodall's 'last words': Ship off Trump, Putin and THESE leaders to space

What is the Insurrection Act, and why is Donald Trump talking about it?

Trump says didn't ask Netanyahu to not be 'f***ing negative,' warns Hamas 'if..'

After countries, Trump tariffs trucks entering US from November 1

Protests Erupt in Oregon Against Donald Trump's Immigration Crackdown

Living Nostradamus warns of 'imminent crisis,' makes scary prophecy about Trump

ICE turns arrest into meme; mocks detainee in bizarre ‘ride of shame’ vid. Watch

Judge blocks Trump admin’s temporary National Guard deployment to Oregon