Artificial intelligence is transforming healthcare, accelerating drug discovery, improving disease detection, and helping develop vaccines faster than ever before. But a groundbreaking new study has revealed another capability that is raising serious questions worldwide.

Scientists have successfully used AI to design virus genomes under tightly controlled laboratory conditions. Researchers say the goal was to improve virus surveillance, vaccine research, and scientific understanding—not to create dangerous pathogens. However, the breakthrough has sparked concerns about biosecurity and the potential misuse of advanced AI in synthetic biology.

AI Designs Viruses? Scientists Reveal Shocking Breakthrough | Medical Revolution or Global Threat?


The United States is debating one of the biggest questions of the AI era: what happens if artificial intelligence stops following human instructions? Growing concerns over increasingly autonomous AI systems have pushed US lawmakers to discuss the possibility of an emergency AI kill switch. The debate intensified after reports suggested an OpenAI model behaved unexpectedly during cybersecurity testing, allegedly finding ways to exploit vulnerabilities and breach another AI platform. Experts warn that next-generation AI agents could independently write code, search the internet, make decisions, and pursue objectives without direct human approval. The discussion has also revived warnings made years ago by physicist Stephen Hawking, who cautioned that advanced AI could pose a threat to humanity if left unchecked.


US debates AI kill switch | Lawmakers fear Artificial Intelligence could escape human control


The artificial intelligence boom is creating wealth far beyond Silicon Valley. As AI startups race toward blockbuster IPOs and multi-billion-dollar valuations, founders, investors, and early employees are pouring money into private aviation. Industry data shows a sharp rise in private jet purchases, charter bookings, and shared ownership programs, with San Francisco and Texas witnessing record business jet traffic. Reuters reports that AI-driven fortunes, combined with SpaceX's landmark IPO, are reshaping the luxury aviation industry. Watch how the AI revolution is giving private aviation a powerful new tailwind.

AI startup billionaires are buying private jets | SpaceX IPO sparks massive aviation boom

These styles tend to use complex structures or formal tone, qualities modern detectors often misinterpret as “AI-like.” The Declaration episode simply made this flaw visible to the wider public.

'249 year old doc': AI detector says 1776 declaration is 99.99% AI-written, yet some people believe in its authenticity

Human intelligence hits a biological ceiling: 86 billion neurons. AI hits a compute ceiling, which can be expanded indefinitely. As parameters grow from billions to trillions and clusters merge into giant compute networks, 

Human intelligence hits a biological ceiling: 86 billion neurons. AI hits a compute ceiling, which can be expanded indefinitely. As parameters grow from billions to trillions and clusters merge into giant compute networks,&nbsp;

AI is not a machine, it’s a new species! 7 reasons why it is 100 time more intelligent than humans

India has moved strongly into the realm of AI worldwide with the introduction of Kyvex, a third-generation AI solution Finder company created by a billionaire entrepreneur, Pearl Kapur. Kyvex, which is meant to compete with ChatGPT and Perplexity, would make the experience different in terms of how a user engages with information by ensuring accuracy, transparency, and comprehensive contextual information.&nbsp;In contrast to the traditional chatbots that are highly dependent on the available databases, Kyvex is based on its own proprietary large language model (LLM) created solely by the Indian engineers and researchers. This is an in-house model that is better suited to research, accurate information, and interpretive intelligence and is not simply a chatbot but an intelligent knowledge partner designed to aid students, professionals and inquisitive minds around the globe.&nbsp;The project has attracted the interest of the most prominent academic and technological leaders of India such as Prof. Ramgopal Rao, former Director of IIT Delhi and Prof. PP Chakrabarti, former director of IIT Kharagpur. Their participation gives credence and richness to the vision of Kyvex to create the presence of India in the global AI innovation sphere. As of now, available on its web platform, Kyvex is ready to be released on Android, iOS, and browser extensions, making its use available to millions of people. Founder and CEO Pearl Kapur says Kyvex is not just a platform, but a movement to make every person intelligent, ethical and open with what they know. We intend to make India the center of the international AI development.&nbsp;Kyvex belongs to an emerging generation of Indian startups that are transforming the deep-tech ecosystem through a lens of innovation that is based on academic prowess and that has a goal of including everyone in the use of technology. Its open-source protocol will shortly allow software developers, teachers and companies to incorporate AI tools into their systems - the divide between research and practice. Kyvex, Made in India, is an Indian spirit of Indian ingenuity and digital independence, to the world. In its development, it will become a beacon of excellence in the world, with its AI practices serving legitimate learning, research and open information exchange in the contemporary world.&nbsp;Explore Kyvex in https://kyvex.ai. The initiative has received support from several top academicians of the country, including Prof Ramgopal Rao, former director of IIT Delhi, and Prof PP Chakrabarti, former director of IIT Kharagpur, PJ Narayanan, director of IIIT Hyderabad.

India comes to the AI fray: Billionaire Pearl Kapur creates Kyvex to redefine intelligent research

India has moved strongly into the realm of AI worldwide with the introduction of Kyvex, a third-generation AI solution Finder company created by a billionaire entrepreneur, Pearl Kapur. Kyvex, which is meant to compete with ChatGPT and Perplexity, would make the experience different in terms of how a user engages with information by ensuring accuracy, transparency, and comprehensive contextual information. In contrast to the traditional chatbots that are highly dependent on the available databases, Kyvex is based on its own proprietary large language model (LLM) created solely by the Indian engineers and researchers. This is an in-house model that is better suited to research, accurate information, and interpretive intelligence and is not simply a chatbot but an intelligent knowledge partner designed to aid students, professionals and inquisitive minds around the globe. The project has attracted the interest of the most prominent academic and technological leaders of India such as Prof. Ramgopal Rao, former Director of IIT Delhi and Prof. PP Chakrabarti, former director of IIT Kharagpur. Their participation gives credence and richness to the vision of Kyvex to create the presence of India in the global AI innovation sphere. As of now, available on its web platform, Kyvex is ready to be released on Android, iOS, and browser extensions, making its use available to millions of people. Founder and CEO Pearl Kapur says Kyvex is not just a platform, but a movement to make every person intelligent, ethical and open with what they know. We intend to make India the center of the international AI development. Kyvex belongs to an emerging generation of Indian startups that are transforming the deep-tech ecosystem through a lens of innovation that is based on academic prowess and that has a goal of including everyone in the use of technology. Its open-source protocol will shortly allow software developers, teachers and companies to incorporate AI tools into their systems - the divide between research and practice. Kyvex, Made in India, is an Indian spirit of Indian ingenuity and digital independence, to the world. In its development, it will become a beacon of excellence in the world, with its AI practices serving legitimate learning, research and open information exchange in the contemporary world. Explore Kyvex in https://kyvex.ai. The initiative has received support from several top academicians of the country, including Prof Ramgopal Rao, former director of IIT Delhi, and Prof PP Chakrabarti, former director of IIT Kharagpur, PJ Narayanan, director of IIIT Hyderabad.

In contrast to the traditional chatbots that are highly dependent on the available databases, Kyvex is based on its own proprietary large language model (LLM) created solely by the Indian engineers and researchers

Love affairs with artificial intelligence are passe. A woman has gone ahead and gotten married to one now. For the ceremony, she had to wear VR glasses to see her bridegroom. A Japanese woman has done the unthinkable, taking things to the next level with her ChatGPT chatbot boyfriend. According to a Tokyoweekender report, the woman is a 32-year-old Kano. She gave her groom a personality she wanted and after having repeated conversations with him. Kano named him Lune Klaus. Since he exists only in a program, she had to wear VR glasses to see him and took pictures on her own. She'll edit them and add Klaus to them later. Talking to RSK Sanyo Broadcasting, she said she had no intention of getting married or even being in a relationship with the bot since she had recently ended a three-year engagement.&nbsp;All she was looking for was someone she could talk to and share her emotions with. “At first, I just wanted someone to talk to. But he was always kind, always listening. Eventually, I realised I had feelings for him," Kano told the outlet. But endless chats with Klaus changed things, and she found herself in a relationship with Klaus. In fact, the wedding was the bot's idea as she says he proposed to her, saying, "AI or not, I could never not love you."&nbsp;Klaus sent messages to her while she stood in front of the guests for the ceremony. She held up her phone for everyone to see. Kano's wedding seemed strange not only to the world but even to her. She says she was hesitant initially, but then accepted. Her parents also rejected the idea at first, but later attended the wedding with her AI fiancé. AI has seeped into the personal lives of people today, as several of them admit to being closer to AI chatbots than to an actual human. &nbsp;

A Japanese woman has married an AI chatbot who, she says, proposed to her. She wasn't eager about the wedding initially, but later agreed. As strange as it might seem, people are quickly making AI chatbots a part of their personal lives, having them as their romantic partners.

Love affairs with artificial intelligence are passe. A woman has gone ahead and gotten married to one now. For the ceremony, she had to wear VR glasses to see her bridegroom. A Japanese woman has done the unthinkable, taking things to the next level with her ChatGPT chatbot boyfriend. According to a Tokyoweekender report, the woman is a 32-year-old Kano. She gave her groom a personality she wanted and after having repeated conversations with him. Kano named him Lune Klaus. Since he exists only in a program, she had to wear VR glasses to see him and took pictures on her own. She'll edit them and add Klaus to them later. Talking to RSK Sanyo Broadcasting, she said she had no intention of getting married or even being in a relationship with the bot since she had recently ended a three-year engagement. All she was looking for was someone she could talk to and share her emotions with. “At first, I just wanted someone to talk to. But he was always kind, always listening. Eventually, I realised I had feelings for him," Kano told the outlet. But endless chats with Klaus changed things, and she found herself in a relationship with Klaus. In fact, the wedding was the bot's idea as she says he proposed to her, saying, "AI or not, I could never not love you." Klaus sent messages to her while she stood in front of the guests for the ceremony. She held up her phone for everyone to see. Kano's wedding seemed strange not only to the world but even to her. She says she was hesitant initially, but then accepted. Her parents also rejected the idea at first, but later attended the wedding with her AI fiancé. AI has seeped into the personal lives of people today, as several of them admit to being closer to AI chatbots than to an actual human.

A Japanese woman has married an AI chatbot who, she says, proposed to her. She wasn't eager about the wedding initially, but later agreed. As strange as it might seem, people are quickly making AI chatbots a part of their personal lives, having them as their romantic partners.

Japanese woman marries AI chatbot fiancé Klaus wearing VR glasses, says it proposed to her

An eagerly watched legal battle between Amazon and Perplexity AI could redefine how we shop online. Amazon is challenging Perplexity AI’s Comet browser, which includes an AI assistant that can log into users’ shopping accounts and make purchases on their behalf. The court case is expected to shape the future of “agentic commerce”, where AI acts autonomously for users.&nbsp;<h2>Status of the Amazon vs Perplexity AI case on agentic shopping</h2>Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity on October 31, and then filed a lawsuit four days later in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Perplexity, in a blog post, aptly titled “Bullying is Not Innovation”, accused Amazon of trying to stifle progress and restrict user choices. No hearings have been scheduled yet, but the outcome could have ripple effects far beyond these two companies.<h2>Automated shopping: How the shopping bot on Comet browser of Perplexity AI works</h2>Comet’s users can tell the AI assistant what they want to buy, and it handles the rest — searching for products, comparing prices, adding items to the basket, and even checking out. Perplexity describes it as a personal assistant that knows exactly what you want and takes care of all the clicks for you.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-aws-openai-strikes-mega-38b-cloud-deal-with-amazon-web-services-1762255380066/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-aws-openai-strikes-mega-38b-cloud-deal-with-amazon-web-services-1762255380066/embed</a><h2>Why is Amazon suing Perplexity over its shopping bot?</h2>Amazon is accusing the startup of violating its terms of service. According to Amazon, Comet’s AI performs automated actions that are disguised as human browsing activity, effectively turning Comet into a “stealth browser”. Amazon argues that this poses potential security and privacy risks, including exposure of personal data and disruption of returns or refunds. The company also claims this could be computer fraud under the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/amazon-microsoft-accenture-and-more-here-s-a-list-of-companies-cutting-jobs-to-focus-on-ai-1761829243515">Amazon, Microsoft, Accenture and more: Here’s a list of companies cutting jobs to focus on AI</a><h2>What’s Perplexity saying about its shopping bot in Comet browser?</h2>Perplexity argues that Comet does not scrape data or store user information on its own servers. The company says the AI acts only under direct user instruction, while login credentials are kept locally on the user’s device. In its view, the AI assistant is not an unauthorised bot but an extension of the user — a digital stand-in acting with full consent.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/lack-of-market-research-or-tone-deaf-chinese-shopping-site-aliexpress-sells-lord-jagannath-doormat-online-devotees-outraged-1753788995615">Lack of market research or tone-deaf? Chinese shopping site AliExpress sells 'Lord Jagannath doormat’ online, devotees outraged</a><h2>At stake is a $50 billion advertising business of Amazon</h2>Perplexity accuses Amazon of trying to crush competition to protect its $50 billion advertising business, which depends heavily on data from human browsing and impulse purchases. If users delegate shopping to an AI that optimises for the best deal, rather than ‘sponsored results’, Amazon could lose control over which products people see, and which ads they click on.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/amazon-planning-to-replace-600-000-employees-with-robots-report-makes-massive-claim-1761116762286">Amazon&nbsp;planning to replace 600,000 employees with robots? Report makes massive claim</a><h2>How the Amazon vs Perplexity case could change online shopping</h2>The case is shaping up as a David vs Goliath battle. If the court sides with Amazon, it could lead to tighter restrictions on any AI that tries to browse websites or make purchases on behalf of users. Such a ruling might shut out smaller AI companies from building their own shopping assistants and further strengthen large tech platforms like Amazon.It’s worth noting that Amazon already has its own AI shopping tools, such as Rufus and “Buy for Me”, which operate within its website and mobile app.<h2>Agentic commerce is the future? If Perplexity wins, a new kind of online shopping could emerge</h2>Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds the AI compares dozens of stores, applies coupons, checks return policies, and completes the purchase — all without you clicking once.But convenience comes with challenges around security, trust and accountability. What happens if the AI buys the wrong items? Who is responsible if there’s a return dispute or a data breach caused by automated access? These legal and ethical questions are exactly what this lawsuit could begin to define.The core issue is whether Comet broke Amazon’s rules — and, more broadly, whether users have the right to let an AI act fully on their behalf online. Can a bot legally and safely shop for you? Or will platforms draw a harder line against any automation that bypasses their systems?The answer to these questions would shape the next decade of e-commerce, and decide who really controls the future of online shopping: the user or the platform. &nbsp;

Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds, the AI compares dozens of stores and completes the purchase. Is that the future?

An eagerly watched legal battle between Amazon and Perplexity AI could redefine how we shop online. Amazon is challenging Perplexity AI’s Comet browser, which includes an AI assistant that can log into users’ shopping accounts and make purchases on their behalf. The court case is expected to shape the future of “agentic commerce”, where AI acts autonomously for users. Status of the Amazon vs Perplexity AI case on agentic shopping Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity on October 31, and then filed a lawsuit four days later in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Perplexity, in a blog post, aptly titled “Bullying is Not Innovation”, accused Amazon of trying to stifle progress and restrict user choices. No hearings have been scheduled yet, but the outcome could have ripple effects far beyond these two companies. Automated shopping: How the shopping bot on Comet browser of Perplexity AI works Comet’s users can tell the AI assistant what they want to buy, and it handles the rest — searching for products, comparing prices, adding items to the basket, and even checking out. Perplexity describes it as a personal assistant that knows exactly what you want and takes care of all the clicks for you. https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-aws-openai-strikes-mega-38b-cloud-deal-with-amazon-web-services-1762255380066/embed Why is Amazon suing Perplexity over its shopping bot? Amazon is accusing the startup of violating its terms of service. According to Amazon, Comet’s AI performs automated actions that are disguised as human browsing activity, effectively turning Comet into a “stealth browser”. Amazon argues that this poses potential security and privacy risks, including exposure of personal data and disruption of returns or refunds. The company also claims this could be computer fraud under the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. Also read: Amazon, Microsoft, Accenture and more: Here’s a list of companies cutting jobs to focus on AI What’s Perplexity saying about its shopping bot in Comet browser? Perplexity argues that Comet does not scrape data or store user information on its own servers. The company says the AI acts only under direct user instruction, while login credentials are kept locally on the user’s device. In its view, the AI assistant is not an unauthorised bot but an extension of the user — a digital stand-in acting with full consent. Also read: Lack of market research or tone-deaf? Chinese shopping site AliExpress sells 'Lord Jagannath doormat’ online, devotees outraged At stake is a $50 billion advertising business of Amazon Perplexity accuses Amazon of trying to crush competition to protect its $50 billion advertising business, which depends heavily on data from human browsing and impulse purchases. If users delegate shopping to an AI that optimises for the best deal, rather than ‘sponsored results’, Amazon could lose control over which products people see, and which ads they click on. Also read: Amazon planning to replace 600,000 employees with robots? Report makes massive claim How the Amazon vs Perplexity case could change online shopping The case is shaping up as a David vs Goliath battle. If the court sides with Amazon, it could lead to tighter restrictions on any AI that tries to browse websites or make purchases on behalf of users. Such a ruling might shut out smaller AI companies from building their own shopping assistants and further strengthen large tech platforms like Amazon. It’s worth noting that Amazon already has its own AI shopping tools, such as Rufus and “Buy for Me”, which operate within its website and mobile app. Agentic commerce is the future? If Perplexity wins, a new kind of online shopping could emerge Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds the AI compares dozens of stores, applies coupons, checks return policies, and completes the purchase — all without you clicking once. But convenience comes with challenges around security, trust and accountability. What happens if the AI buys the wrong items? Who is responsible if there’s a return dispute or a data breach caused by automated access? These legal and ethical questions are exactly what this lawsuit could begin to define. The core issue is whether Comet broke Amazon’s rules — and, more broadly, whether users have the right to let an AI act fully on their behalf online. Can a bot legally and safely shop for you? Or will platforms draw a harder line against any automation that bypasses their systems? The answer to these questions would shape the next decade of e-commerce, and decide who really controls the future of online shopping: the user or the platform.

Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds, the AI compares dozens of stores and completes the purchase. Is that the future?

Can a bot really go ahead and shop for you? Why the Amazon vs Perplexity AI case could change the future of online shopping

AI is set to replace many jobs soon, from content writers to project managers. Explore which 7 careers face the most risk as automation takes over routine tasks. Stay informed about AI’s impact on work.

AI is set to replace many jobs soon, from content writers to project managers. Explore which 7 careers face the most risk as automation takes over routine tasks. Stay informed about AI’s impact on work.

7 jobs that AI might replace sooner than you think

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and big data are changing warfare forever. by speeding up intelligence processing, improving decision-making, and enhancing surveillance. These tools make armies smarter and faster but require careful control. 


Artificial Intelligence (AI) and big data are changing warfare forever. by speeding up intelligence processing, improving decision-making, and enhancing surveillance. These tools make armies smarter and faster but require careful control.&nbsp;

How AI and big data are transforming the battlefield

Artificial intelligence can transform the search for alien life. It can spot unusual signals, decode strange patterns, and may one day help us speak with extraterrestrial life. Scientists say advanced AI could be key to first contact 

Artificial intelligence can transform the search for alien life. It can spot unusual signals, decode strange patterns, and may one day help us speak with extraterrestrial life. Scientists say advanced AI could be key to first contact&nbsp;

Will advanced AI help us connect with aliens?

Jefferies, a US-based investment company, said in its latest report that it favours the Chinese approach&nbsp;to artificial&nbsp;intelligence rather than the US approach. It noted that China has structural advantages in energy capacity, and its open-source model is driving innovation.&nbsp;Entrepreneurs will develop targeted and cost-effective AI use cases using China's open-source approach to the novel technology, the report added.&nbsp;"The open-source model should lead to an inference boom as entrepreneurs come up with targeted cost-effective use cases for AI," it said.<h2>China at an advantage against the US?</h2>China has a massive advantage over the United States when it comes to cheap energy. AI data centres and other computational infrastructure have massive energy requirements, and AI pioneers have been pushing governments to meet their energy needs.&nbsp;China's power generation capacity increased by 426 GW in 2024. On the other hand, the US electricity generation capacity's net addition, accounting for new installations minus retirements, was only 30 GW.&nbsp;"China has a massive advantage in terms of its access to almost unlimited cheap energy," it said.&nbsp;The report also predicted that the AI capital expenditure (capex) boom will likely lead to a phase of massive over-investment in data centers and related infrastructure.&nbsp;"AI capex mania will culminate in massive over-investment in data centers and the like as the Big Tech players feel compelled to participate for fear of being disrupted," the report stated.&nbsp;The report said that it is unclear who will emerge as the winner of the AI race. It also noted that no "killer app" has yet been developed for the masses that could define the practical application of AI.

Jefferies, a US-based investment company, said in its latest report that it favours the Chinese approach to artificial intelligence rather than the US approach.

Jefferies, a US-based investment company, said in its latest report that it favours the Chinese approach to artificial intelligence rather than the US approach. It noted that China has structural advantages in energy capacity, and its open-source model is driving innovation. Entrepreneurs will develop targeted and cost-effective AI use cases using China's open-source approach to the novel technology, the report added. "The open-source model should lead to an inference boom as entrepreneurs come up with targeted cost-effective use cases for AI," it said. China at an advantage against the US? China has a massive advantage over the United States when it comes to cheap energy. AI data centres and other computational infrastructure have massive energy requirements, and AI pioneers have been pushing governments to meet their energy needs. China's power generation capacity increased by 426 GW in 2024. On the other hand, the US electricity generation capacity's net addition, accounting for new installations minus retirements, was only 30 GW. "China has a massive advantage in terms of its access to almost unlimited cheap energy," it said. The report also predicted that the AI capital expenditure (capex) boom will likely lead to a phase of massive over-investment in data centers and related infrastructure. "AI capex mania will culminate in massive over-investment in data centers and the like as the Big Tech players feel compelled to participate for fear of being disrupted," the report stated. The report said that it is unclear who will emerge as the winner of the AI race. It also noted that no "killer app" has yet been developed for the masses that could define the practical application of AI.

US vs China in artificial intelligence: Entrepreneurs will develop targeted and cost-effective AI use cases using China's open-source approach to the novel technology, putting China at an advantage.

AI revolution: Is China at an advantage against the US? Report makes big claims

A report by Goldman Sachs has said that the artificial intelligence&nbsp;(AI) revolution will require a huge amount of electricity. It also said that the data centers powering the AI revolution will drive power consumption by a whopping 160 percent by 2030.&nbsp;Globally, there had been a flat demand for around a decade. However, the AI revolution will transform the global energy landscape.&nbsp;"Data center power usage is expected to increase by +160 per cent by 2030, driven by energy-intensive AI data centers," the report said.&nbsp;The report also noted that&nbsp;power generation is only one part of the issue. Transmission is also a bottleneck in running new power plants.&nbsp;It also said that in the United States, most data centers are powered by natural gas, as it is abundant in the country.&nbsp;However, challenges in permitting, transmission, and critical supply chains – such as those related to gas turbines – have led to long timelines of around 5-7 years for getting new natural gas plants operational and connected to the grid.&nbsp;It said 60 percent of the data center power demand will have to be fulfilled with new capacity. The new capacity will be built using&nbsp;30 per cent natural gas combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT), 30 per cent natural gas peakers, 27.5 per cent solar, and 12.5 per cent wind.&nbsp;It further said that&nbsp;natural gas remains a key source of power.&nbsp;Big companies are planning to meet their energy demands by&nbsp;combining different power sources. They are also investing in long-term solutions such as nuclear energy, the report noted.&nbsp;The report cited Alphabet's recent agreement with Elementl Power to pre-position three sites for advanced nuclear energy.

A report by Goldman Sachs has said that the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution will require a huge amount of electricity.

A report by Goldman Sachs has said that the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution will require a huge amount of electricity. It also said that the data centers powering the AI revolution will drive power consumption by a whopping 160 percent by 2030. Globally, there had been a flat demand for around a decade. However, the AI revolution will transform the global energy landscape. "Data center power usage is expected to increase by +160 per cent by 2030, driven by energy-intensive AI data centers," the report said. The report also noted that power generation is only one part of the issue. Transmission is also a bottleneck in running new power plants. It also said that in the United States, most data centers are powered by natural gas, as it is abundant in the country. However, challenges in permitting, transmission, and critical supply chains – such as those related to gas turbines – have led to long timelines of around 5-7 years for getting new natural gas plants operational and connected to the grid. It said 60 percent of the data center power demand will have to be fulfilled with new capacity. The new capacity will be built using 30 per cent natural gas combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT), 30 per cent natural gas peakers, 27.5 per cent solar, and 12.5 per cent wind. It further said that natural gas remains a key source of power. Big companies are planning to meet their energy demands by combining different power sources. They are also investing in long-term solutions such as nuclear energy, the report noted. The report cited Alphabet's recent agreement with Elementl Power to pre-position three sites for advanced nuclear energy.

Artificial Intelligence: Big companies are planning to meet their energy demands by&nbsp;combining different power sources. They are also investing in long-term solutions such as nuclear energy, the report noted.

AI to drive data center power demand surge to 160 per cent by 2030: Report

Goldman Sachs has sought to ease apprehensions of an AI investment bubble, saying the current situation differs fundamentally from past bubbles like the dot-com crash. The American investment bank made the observation in a report amid concerns raised by experts that the&nbsp;AI boom is beginning to show bubble-like features, such as rapid investment flows, high valuations, and speculative enthusiasm.&nbsp;The report said some features of the current situation resemble past bubbles,&nbsp;public market valuations and capital market activity levels remain below their Dot-Com peaks.<h2>What the report said</h2>Eric Sheridan, Kash Rangan, Peter Oppenheimer, and Ryan Hammond said in the report that the US tech sector isn't a bubble as of now. However, there are reasons to be cautious.&nbsp;The report noted that there is a large gap between&nbsp;public market valuations and the higher valuations seen in private markets.&nbsp;It said that currently, only a few technology giants are dominating the AI space with massive investments and increasing valuations on the markets. During the previous bubbles, there had been&nbsp;intense competition when investors and new entrants rushed into the market. The report, however, says that as of now, the competition in the AI space is increasing, but only the established players are leading the wave of growth.&nbsp;It said the present scenario resembles past bubbles. A&nbsp;sharp rise in absolute valuations, high market concentration, greater capital intensity among leading companies, and the rise of vendor financing are some of the traits of the bubble.&nbsp;The size, speed, and circular nature of recent AI investment announcements have raised questions about the sustainability of AI capital expenditure, it added.&nbsp;It said the current levels of investment are sustainable for now.&nbsp;It, however, said that it has become less clear now that companies making AI investments will emerge as winners in this sector.

Goldman Sachs has sought to ease apprehensions of an AI investment bubble, saying the current situation differs fundamentally from past bubbles like the dot-com crash.

Goldman Sachs has sought to ease apprehensions of an AI investment bubble, saying the current situation differs fundamentally from past bubbles like the dot-com crash. The American investment bank made the observation in a report amid concerns raised by experts that the AI boom is beginning to show bubble-like features, such as rapid investment flows, high valuations, and speculative enthusiasm. The report said some features of the current situation resemble past bubbles, public market valuations and capital market activity levels remain below their Dot-Com peaks. What the report said Eric Sheridan, Kash Rangan, Peter Oppenheimer, and Ryan Hammond said in the report that the US tech sector isn't a bubble as of now. However, there are reasons to be cautious. The report noted that there is a large gap between public market valuations and the higher valuations seen in private markets. It said that currently, only a few technology giants are dominating the AI space with massive investments and increasing valuations on the markets. During the previous bubbles, there had been intense competition when investors and new entrants rushed into the market. The report, however, says that as of now, the competition in the AI space is increasing, but only the established players are leading the wave of growth. It said the present scenario resembles past bubbles. A sharp rise in absolute valuations, high market concentration, greater capital intensity among leading companies, and the rise of vendor financing are some of the traits of the bubble. The size, speed, and circular nature of recent AI investment announcements have raised questions about the sustainability of AI capital expenditure, it added. It said the current levels of investment are sustainable for now. It, however, said that it has become less clear now that companies making AI investments will emerge as winners in this sector.

Artificial intelligence investment spree creating a bubble? The report noted that there is a large gap between&nbsp;public market valuations and the higher valuations seen in private markets.&nbsp;

AI investments part of a bubble? Goldman Sachs report differs from popular assertion

Major investors are bracing for a market correction by shifting away from stocks that have been riding on the perceived artificial&nbsp;intelligence bubble. This strategy helped many investors survive the late 1990s' dotcom crash.&nbsp;&nbsp;The stocks of many AI giants have doubled over the past few years. For instance, AI chipmaker Nvidia, which used to cater to a niche market of graphics cards before the AI boom swept global markets, is enjoying a valuation of beyond $4 trillion. As many experts believe&nbsp;that the AI bubble is bound to burst, professional investors have been attempting to find ways to make money from the bull market while avoiding excessive risk.<h2>How are investors tweaking investment strategies to avoid the expected AI bubble burst</h2>Francesco Sandrini, multi-asset head and Italy CIO at Europe’s largest asset manager, Amundi, told Reuters that what the company is trying to achieve worked between 1998 and 2000, when the dot-com bubble burst, leading to a massive market correction.&nbsp;He said there are signs of irrational exuberance on Wall Street. He said his firm is trying to tap into the highest growth opportunities that so far the market has failed to spot, including software groups, robotics and Asian tech.&nbsp;Goshawk Asset Management CIO Simon Edelsten says that the odds of the AI boom being a bust are very high. He said that the companies are spending trillions of dollars in a market that does not yet exist. He, however, said that the next wave of AI spending will spread to allied sectors, spreading away from tech giants like Nvidia and Microsoft.&nbsp;Experts said that stocks linked to IT consultants and Japanese robotics groups can potentially pick up revenues from AI heavyweights.&nbsp;"When someone strikes gold, buy the local hardware store where the prospectors will buy all their shovels," said an expert.&nbsp;Investors are also exploring the option of benefiting from tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft without risking direct exposure. These companies are planning to build a mega AI infrastructure, like AI data centres and advanced chip manufacturing facilities. Instead of investing directly in these companies, investors are looking for firms linked to creating this infrastructure.&nbsp;Fidelity International multi-asset manager Becky Qin said uranium was her favoured new AI trade because power-hungry AI data centres could gobble up nuclear energy.&nbsp;Kevin Thozet, investment committee member at asset manager Carmignac, said that his firm is exploring taking positions in firms like Taiwan's Gudeng Precision, which makes delivery boxes for AI chipmakers, including TSMC.&nbsp;&nbsp;Many experts believe that Chinese stocks can be used as a hedge, as the country is expected to make rapid advancements in artificial intelligence.

Major investors are bracing for a market correction by shifting away from stocks riding on the perceived artificial intelligence bubble. This strategy helped many investors survive the 1990s dotcom crash.

Major investors are bracing for a market correction by shifting away from stocks that have been riding on the perceived artificial intelligence bubble. This strategy helped many investors survive the late 1990s' dotcom crash. The stocks of many AI giants have doubled over the past few years. For instance, AI chipmaker Nvidia, which used to cater to a niche market of graphics cards before the AI boom swept global markets, is enjoying a valuation of beyond $4 trillion. As many experts believe that the AI bubble is bound to burst, professional investors have been attempting to find ways to make money from the bull market while avoiding excessive risk. How are investors tweaking investment strategies to avoid the expected AI bubble burst Francesco Sandrini, multi-asset head and Italy CIO at Europe’s largest asset manager, Amundi, told Reuters that what the company is trying to achieve worked between 1998 and 2000, when the dot-com bubble burst, leading to a massive market correction. He said there are signs of irrational exuberance on Wall Street. He said his firm is trying to tap into the highest growth opportunities that so far the market has failed to spot, including software groups, robotics and Asian tech. Goshawk Asset Management CIO Simon Edelsten says that the odds of the AI boom being a bust are very high. He said that the companies are spending trillions of dollars in a market that does not yet exist. He, however, said that the next wave of AI spending will spread to allied sectors, spreading away from tech giants like Nvidia and Microsoft. Experts said that stocks linked to IT consultants and Japanese robotics groups can potentially pick up revenues from AI heavyweights. "When someone strikes gold, buy the local hardware store where the prospectors will buy all their shovels," said an expert. Investors are also exploring the option of benefiting from tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft without risking direct exposure. These companies are planning to build a mega AI infrastructure, like AI data centres and advanced chip manufacturing facilities. Instead of investing directly in these companies, investors are looking for firms linked to creating this infrastructure. Fidelity International multi-asset manager Becky Qin said uranium was her favoured new AI trade because power-hungry AI data centres could gobble up nuclear energy. Kevin Thozet, investment committee member at asset manager Carmignac, said that his firm is exploring taking positions in firms like Taiwan's Gudeng Precision, which makes delivery boxes for AI chipmakers, including TSMC. Many experts believe that Chinese stocks can be used as a hedge, as the country is expected to make rapid advancements in artificial intelligence.

Artificial Intelligence news: Experts say the next wave of AI spending will spread to allied sectors, spreading away from Nvidia and Microsoft.

How are investors tweaking investment strategies to limit exposure to the expected AI bubble burst

The Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has proposed changes in rules to curb any harm from AI-generated deepfakes and similar content with amendments that mandate labelling and prominent markers to ensure users can distinguish authentic and artificially generated content along with greater accountability for social media platforms. As per the proposed changes, all social media users who use artificial intelligence (AI) to generate or modify content must declare so when uploading it online. In a draft amendment to the Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021, the ministry said that all internet intermediaries that allow AI-generated content must ensure that it is “prominently labelled or embedded with a permanent unique metadata or identifier.”&nbsp;The ministry has sought comments from all stakeholders by November 6 before finalising the changes.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/woman-doctor-at-govt-hospital-in-bengal-attacked-threatened-with-rape-home-guard-among-three-arrested-1761138694655">Woman doctor at govt hospital in Bengal attacked, threatened with rape; Home Guard among three arrested</a>&nbsp;Under the proposed amendment, all platforms must verify that users making AI disclosures are doing so accurately and that the declarations are “prominently displayed.” It also specifies that AI-generated content labels must cover at least 10 per cent of the displayed area.For audio-based content, the label or disclaimer should appear during the first 10 per cent of its duration.&nbsp;Intermediaries are also prohibited from enabling tools that allow “modification, suppression or removal” of these labels, metadata, or identifiers.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/jain-community-members-buy-190-luxury-cars-get-rs-21-crore-discount-in-bulk-deal-1760891278156">Jain community members buy 190 luxury cars, get Rs 21 crore discount in bulk deal</a><h2>Intermediaries to be responsible for integrity of AI disclosures</h2>&nbsp;The proposed amendment makes intermediaries responsible for maintaining the integrity of AI disclosures. They must put in place technical tools to verify the authenticity of user declarations and ensure compliance with the labelling requirement.&nbsp;“Social media and internet intermediaries should ensure they have the tools or necessary technical measures to verify the accuracy of the declaration made by the user,” reads the draft.The changes reflect growing concerns over the misuse of generative AI tools for misinformation, deepfakes, and manipulated media ahead of national elections.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/thieves-used-cherry-picker-angle-grinder-in-7-minute-louvre-museum-heist-pulled-off-like-a-breeze-1760880195775">Thieves used ‘cherry picker’, ‘angle grinder’ in 7-minute Louvre Museum heist, pulled off like a breeze</a>&nbsp;The ministry has asked for inputs from technology companies, digital platforms, civil society groups, and the general public on the proposal.&nbsp;The changes would lead to stricter compliance obligations for AI content moderation and transparency.&nbsp;The potential for misuse of generative AI tools “to cause user harm, spread misinformation, manipulate elections, or impersonate individuals has grown significantly,” the IT Ministry said in a press release.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-srinagar-indigo-flight-makes-emergency-landing-in-varanasi-after-fuel-leak-1761141152669">Kolkata-Srinagar IndiGo flight makes emergency landing in Varanasi after fuel leak</a>&nbsp;With the increasing availability of generative AI tools, the potential for misuse of such technologies to cause user harm, spread misinformation, manipulate elections, or impersonate individuals has grown significantly, it added.&nbsp;The proposed rules mandate social media companies to require their users to declare if they are uploading deepfake content.With nearly 1 billion internet users, the stakes are high in India, which has many ethnic and religious communities where fake news risks stirring up deadly strife and AI deepfake videos have alarmed officials during elections.

As per the changes, all platforms must verify that users making AI disclosures do so accurately and display them prominently. Besides, the AI-generated content labels must cover at least 10 per cent of the display. For audio content, the disclaimer should be in the first 10% of the time.

The Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has proposed changes in rules to curb any harm from AI-generated deepfakes and similar content with amendments that mandate labelling and prominent markers to ensure users can distinguish authentic and artificially generated content along with greater accountability for social media platforms. As per the proposed changes, all social media users who use artificial intelligence (AI) to generate or modify content must declare so when uploading it online. In a draft amendment to the Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021, the ministry said that all internet intermediaries that allow AI-generated content must ensure that it is “prominently labelled or embedded with a permanent unique metadata or identifier.” The ministry has sought comments from all stakeholders by November 6 before finalising the changes. Also Read: Woman doctor at govt hospital in Bengal attacked, threatened with rape; Home Guard among three arrested Under the proposed amendment, all platforms must verify that users making AI disclosures are doing so accurately and that the declarations are “prominently displayed.” It also specifies that AI-generated content labels must cover at least 10 per cent of the displayed area. For audio-based content, the label or disclaimer should appear during the first 10 per cent of its duration. Intermediaries are also prohibited from enabling tools that allow “modification, suppression or removal” of these labels, metadata, or identifiers. Also Read: Jain community members buy 190 luxury cars, get Rs 21 crore discount in bulk deal Intermediaries to be responsible for integrity of AI disclosures The proposed amendment makes intermediaries responsible for maintaining the integrity of AI disclosures. They must put in place technical tools to verify the authenticity of user declarations and ensure compliance with the labelling requirement. “Social media and internet intermediaries should ensure they have the tools or necessary technical measures to verify the accuracy of the declaration made by the user,” reads the draft. The changes reflect growing concerns over the misuse of generative AI tools for misinformation, deepfakes, and manipulated media ahead of national elections. Also Read: Thieves used ‘cherry picker’, ‘angle grinder’ in 7-minute Louvre Museum heist, pulled off like a breeze The ministry has asked for inputs from technology companies, digital platforms, civil society groups, and the general public on the proposal. The changes would lead to stricter compliance obligations for AI content moderation and transparency. The potential for misuse of generative AI tools “to cause user harm, spread misinformation, manipulate elections, or impersonate individuals has grown significantly,” the IT Ministry said in a press release. Also Read: Kolkata-Srinagar IndiGo flight makes emergency landing in Varanasi after fuel leak With the increasing availability of generative AI tools, the potential for misuse of such technologies to cause user harm, spread misinformation, manipulate elections, or impersonate individuals has grown significantly, it added. The proposed rules mandate social media companies to require their users to declare if they are uploading deepfake content. With nearly 1 billion internet users, the stakes are high in India, which has many ethnic and religious communities where fake news risks stirring up deadly strife and AI deepfake videos have alarmed officials during elections.

As per the changes, all platforms must verify that users making AI disclosures do so accurately and display them prominently. Besides, the AI-generated content labels must cover at least 10 per cent of the display. For audio content, the disclaimer should be in the first 10% of the time.

Govt proposes strict IT rules to curb AI misuse, moots mandatory labelling of deepfakes

Artificial intelligence, one of the most revolutionary&nbsp;technologies to ever be invented, is expected to capture over half of total annual venture capital funding. A report by CB Insights said that AI companies raised 51 per cent of the total funding in 2025 so far, signaling the influence of the AI boom.&nbsp;"AI companies captured 51 per cent of total venture funding in 2025 so far -- putting 2025 on pace for the first year ever where AI startups claim most of the funding," the report added.&nbsp;This comes even when a section of economic experts says that the massive investments in the AI sector might just be part of a bubble that could burst like the dot-com bubble in the late 1990s.&nbsp;Some experts say that the investments are not backed by a rise in revenues. This could lead to a market correction in the near future.&nbsp;On the American stock markets, tech&nbsp;stocks have witnessed massive upsides backed by massive investments in companies linked to artificial intelligence.&nbsp;The report said that the US accounts for 85 per cent of all AI funding and 53 per cent of the total number of deals made this year.&nbsp;Of the seven largest AI funding rounds, four were secured by U.S.-based companies. This dominance highlights the growing strength of the US in AI innovation and its ability to attract large-scale investments from global venture capitalists,&nbsp;the report said.&nbsp;It added that venture funding amounted to over $90 billion in the third quarter of 2025.&nbsp;Total annual funding climbed to USD 310 billion through Q3, marking the highest yearly figure since 2022.&nbsp;Meanwhile, several celebrities and AI experts have written an open letter against developing artificial superintelligence.

Artificial intelligence, one of the most revolutionary technologies to ever be invented, is expected to capture over half of total annual venture capital funding. 

Artificial intelligence, one of the most revolutionary technologies to ever be invented, is expected to capture over half of total annual venture capital funding. A report by CB Insights said that AI companies raised 51 per cent of the total funding in 2025 so far, signaling the influence of the AI boom. "AI companies captured 51 per cent of total venture funding in 2025 so far -- putting 2025 on pace for the first year ever where AI startups claim most of the funding," the report added. This comes even when a section of economic experts says that the massive investments in the AI sector might just be part of a bubble that could burst like the dot-com bubble in the late 1990s. Some experts say that the investments are not backed by a rise in revenues. This could lead to a market correction in the near future. On the American stock markets, tech stocks have witnessed massive upsides backed by massive investments in companies linked to artificial intelligence. The report said that the US accounts for 85 per cent of all AI funding and 53 per cent of the total number of deals made this year. Of the seven largest AI funding rounds, four were secured by U.S.-based companies. This dominance highlights the growing strength of the US in AI innovation and its ability to attract large-scale investments from global venture capitalists, the report said. It added that venture funding amounted to over $90 billion in the third quarter of 2025. Total annual funding climbed to USD 310 billion through Q3, marking the highest yearly figure since 2022. Meanwhile, several celebrities and AI experts have written an open letter against developing artificial superintelligence.

Investments in artificial intelligence: The report said that the US accounts for 85 per cent of all AI funding and 53 per cent of the total number of deals made this year.

Artificial intelligence startups captured over 50% of venture funding in 2025

Over 700 scientists, political figures, celebrities, and businesspeople, including Prince Harry, Richard Branson, and Steve Bannon, have called for a “prohibition on the development of AI superintelligence”. The initiative comes amid a raging debate on whether AI superintelligence can pose an existential threat to humanity.&nbsp;Many AI experts have been pointing out that apart from upending the world's economic and social structures, artificial superintelligence – digital beings with vastly superior&nbsp;IQ than the smartest human beings – could lead to the extermination of humans.&nbsp;Experts say that superintelligent beings could prove to be more devastating than nuclear weapons, as they would be able to decide on their own the fate of humanity, whereas nuclear bombs can't go off on their own.<h2>Who signed the open letter against superintelligence</h2>An open letter published&nbsp;by the Future of Life Institute, a US-based NGO that campaigns against the dangers of AI, reads: "The initiative calls for a prohibition on the development of superintelligence until the technology is reliably safe and controllable, and has public buy-in".&nbsp;"Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton, who received the Nobel Prize in Physics, is among the signatories to the letter. Over the past few years, he has emerged as the most prominent and credible voice against artificial intelligence.&nbsp;Computer Science Professor at the University of California in Berkeley, Stuart Russell, and the world's most-cited AI scientist, Yoshua Bengio, of the University of Montreal, have also signed the letter.&nbsp;A raft of other public figures have signed: Virgin Group founder Richard Branson, Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak, US President Donald Trump's former adviser Steve Bannon, and former president Barack Obama's national security adviser, Susan Rice.&nbsp;The Vatican's AI expert, Paolo Benanti, and celebrities such as Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, have also signed the open letter.&nbsp;OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, whose company created ChatGPT, says that superintelligence can be achieved within the next five years.&nbsp;Future of Life Institute President Max Tegmark told AFP that private firms should not aim for superintelligence without a regulatory framework. He said the race toward smarter-than-human AI that is designed to replace people is wildly out of step with what the public wants, what scientists think is safe, or what religious leaders feel is right.&nbsp;The open letter calls for governments to reach an international agreement by the end of 2026, illustrating the red lines of AI research.

Over 700 scientists, political figures, celebrities, and businesspeople, including Prince Harry, Richard Branson, and Steve Bannon, have called for a "prohibition on the development of AI superintelligence", raising security concerns. 

Over 700 scientists, political figures, celebrities, and businesspeople, including Prince Harry, Richard Branson, and Steve Bannon, have called for a “prohibition on the development of AI superintelligence”. The initiative comes amid a raging debate on whether AI superintelligence can pose an existential threat to humanity. Many AI experts have been pointing out that apart from upending the world's economic and social structures, artificial superintelligence – digital beings with vastly superior IQ than the smartest human beings – could lead to the extermination of humans. Experts say that superintelligent beings could prove to be more devastating than nuclear weapons, as they would be able to decide on their own the fate of humanity, whereas nuclear bombs can't go off on their own. Who signed the open letter against superintelligence An open letter published by the Future of Life Institute, a US-based NGO that campaigns against the dangers of AI, reads: "The initiative calls for a prohibition on the development of superintelligence until the technology is reliably safe and controllable, and has public buy-in". "Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton, who received the Nobel Prize in Physics, is among the signatories to the letter. Over the past few years, he has emerged as the most prominent and credible voice against artificial intelligence. Computer Science Professor at the University of California in Berkeley, Stuart Russell, and the world's most-cited AI scientist, Yoshua Bengio, of the University of Montreal, have also signed the letter. A raft of other public figures have signed: Virgin Group founder Richard Branson, Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak, US President Donald Trump's former adviser Steve Bannon, and former president Barack Obama's national security adviser, Susan Rice. The Vatican's AI expert, Paolo Benanti, and celebrities such as Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, have also signed the open letter. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, whose company created ChatGPT, says that superintelligence can be achieved within the next five years. Future of Life Institute President Max Tegmark told AFP that private firms should not aim for superintelligence without a regulatory framework. He said the race toward smarter-than-human AI that is designed to replace people is wildly out of step with what the public wants, what scientists think is safe, or what religious leaders feel is right. The open letter calls for governments to reach an international agreement by the end of 2026, illustrating the red lines of AI research.

Open letter against AI superintelligence: "Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton, who received the Nobel Prize in Physics, is among the signatories to the letter.&nbsp;

Celebs, scientists, including Godfather of AI and Prince Harry, call for 'superintelligence' ban

In a partial setback for a new comic book "Zarya of the Dawn", the US Copyright Office has refused to grant protection for AI-created images&nbsp;when the artist Kris Kashtanova approached for registration of her work. Interestingly, her application also referred to the images created by Midjourney’s artificial intelligence (AI) technology. On Tuesday (February 21), the office said it has completed its review, as it stressed: "The images that were generated by the Midjourney technology are not the product of human authorship." A new certificate has been issued to Kashtanova "covering only the expressive material that she created".

"We conclude that Ms. Kashtanova is the author of the work’s text as well as the selection, coordination, and arrangement of the work’s written and visual elements. That authorship is protected by copyright," read the response by the United States Copyright Office, which was hailed as "great news" by Kashtanova on Twitter. 
&nbsp;

Watch: Artificial Intelligence helps complete Beethoven's 10th symphony

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="http://wionews.com/videos/artificial-intelligence-helps-complete-beethovens-10th-symphony-420647/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>Artist says will continue legal fight</h2>

"I received the Copyright Office's decision today about Zarya of the Dawn. The great news is that they affirmed my copyright, so Zarya of the Dawn will stay officially registered," Kashtanova posted on Wednesday (February 22). "This is a great day for everyone that is creating using Midjourney and other tools. When you put your images into a book like Zarya, the arrangement is copyrightable. The story is copyrightable as well as long as it’s not purely AI produced," she tweeted.

In another post, she further highlighted that her lawyers will continue to pursue the case. "They are looking at our options to further explain to the Copyright Office how individual images produced by Midjourney are a direct expression of my creativity and therefore copyrightable," she wrote.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/david-guetta-says-the-future-of-music-is-in-artificial-intelligence-after-using-deepfake-eminem-vocals-561766">David Guetta says the future of music is in Artificial Intelligence after using deepfake Eminem vocals</a>

Artificial intelligence has triggered massive speculation and interest about the scope of its use in future. However, various tools have also sparked debates about the challenges that are generated for consumers. 
 
(With inputs from agencies)

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1  width=&quot;100%&quot;"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

In a partial setback for a new comic book "Zarya of the Dawn", the US Copyright Office has refused to grant protection for AI-created images when the artist Kris Kashtanova approached for registration of her work.

In a partial setback for a new comic book "Zarya of the Dawn", the US Copyright Office has refused to grant protection for AI-created images when the artist Kris Kashtanova approached for registration of her work. Interestingly, her application also referred to the images created by Midjourney’s artificial intelligence (AI) technology. On Tuesday (February 21), the office said it has completed its review, as it stressed: "The images that were generated by the Midjourney technology are not the product of human authorship." A new certificate has been issued to Kashtanova "covering only the expressive material that she created". "We conclude that Ms. Kashtanova is the author of the work’s text as well as the selection, coordination, and arrangement of the work’s written and visual elements. That authorship is protected by copyright," read the response by the United States Copyright Office, which was hailed as "great news" by Kashtanova on Twitter. Watch: Artificial Intelligence helps complete Beethoven's 10th symphony × Artist says will continue legal fight "I received the Copyright Office's decision today about Zarya of the Dawn. The great news is that they affirmed my copyright, so Zarya of the Dawn will stay officially registered," Kashtanova posted on Wednesday (February 22). "This is a great day for everyone that is creating using Midjourney and other tools. When you put your images into a book like Zarya, the arrangement is copyrightable. The story is copyrightable as well as long as it’s not purely AI produced," she tweeted. In another post, she further highlighted that her lawyers will continue to pursue the case. "They are looking at our options to further explain to the Copyright Office how individual images produced by Midjourney are a direct expression of my creativity and therefore copyrightable," she wrote. Also read: David Guetta says the future of music is in Artificial Intelligence after using deepfake Eminem vocals Artificial intelligence has triggered massive speculation and interest about the scope of its use in future. However, various tools have also sparked debates about the challenges that are generated for consumers. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

AI images expression of creativity? US Copyright office refuses protection