Arizona congressional candidate claims she was sexually assaulted while repairing signs

Thai Actors Fourth Nattawat, Gemini Norawit face racism accusations from Indian fans over viral Bollywood act

Russia president Putin promises to 'do everything' to help settle Middle East conflict as US-Iran negotiations stall

Pakistan denies reports of PAF jets being used in attacks against Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen

KATSEYE’s Sophia Laforteza to return in 2027 after hiatus, agency issues statement

Trump has a new 'enemy': Anyone who calls it 'artificial intelligence'. Here's what we wants instead

'Nidal Hasan's firing-squad execution to be livestreamed', says Pentagon; first US military execution since 1961

Atlantic hurricane Isaias could make landfall as a strong Category 2 storm, tornado warnings issued

‘Never-ending flow of cheap labour’: JD Vance hits back at Indian-origin Congresswoman over US green card curbs for major tech companies

Air India, Air India Express increase fuel surcharge on domestic, international flights amid rising ATF costs

AUS vs SA: 'That's fine,' says Cummins on Khawaja's book contents about Sandpapergate

'Understood consequences of a few mistakes': Ishan Kishan reflects on journey back to India team

India at UN: Pak allows terror groups to operate from its soil

Flydubai flight attack: Indian pilot Smit Machchhar to receive Israel's highest civilian bravery award for saving 174 lives

Scientists find highly radioactive nuclear particles at Chernobyl 40 years after the disaster

Captain Smit Machchhar on feet again, walks 10 steps as recovery continues after Flydubai flight attack

Nana Patekar's #MeToo controversy: From Tanushree Dutta’s allegations to court ruling

Trump honours Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella with top technology honour amid immigration scrutiny

SC asks Centre to frame mechanism against unethical pharma marketing practices

‘Wait till you discover the other guy’: Rahul Gandhi takes a swipe as Musk's 'Ambani real boss of India' remark triggers X subscription cancellations

Trump's naked 23-karat gold statue unveiled near European Parliament

From Kramatorsk buses to Yandex fire: Russia-Ukraine war in the last 48 hours

Fastest-growing Asian economies in 2026: Who tops the chart? Where does India rank?

OpenAI shuts down Russian, Iranian influence operations using ChatGPT to spread propaganda

Premier League: Haaland wants Manchester City to 'try to enjoy the situation and win the game'

A Love Other Than Yours: The temptation to cheat and what pushes people over the edge

Who is Nana Patekar's wife Neelakanti? The bank officer who earned Rs 2,500 when he earned Rs 50

US suspends Microsoft, Infosys, Tata, Wipro from green card programme over alleged H-1B abuse

New York ICE shooting sparks protests as Mamdani to call on Trump to halt ICE operations

Bangladesh named as Pakistan’s replacement for Asian Hockey Champions Trophy

'Something truly catastrophic will happen': Former OpenAI researchers sound the alarm, claim they were fired for prioritising AI safety

BTS agency HYBE announces first-ever Weverse Con Festival in India

Nigeria govt rolls out 30-day NNPC petrol discount, insists it is not a subsidy

435 House seats, 35 Senate races: The numbers behind US midterms 2026

France student protests: Over 500 arrested, govt promises 3,000 substitute teachers

French students light European bonfire, protests erupt in Belgium, Italy & Greece | Gravitas

New Cold War: Why is China buying more gold? Explained

South Korea-Ukraine ties are facing fresh strain amid a growing row over North Korean prisoners of war captured during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The issue has raised questions over the fate of North Korean soldiers and could further complicate diplomatic ties between Seoul and Kyiv.


South Korea, Ukraine Ties Under Fresh Strain Amid Row Over North Korean PoWs

Residents in Saudi Arabia’s capital reported multiple explosions on Thursday as the kingdom’s renewed military campaign against the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen intensifies. The reports came a day after Saudi authorities said Houthi strikes on two major airports killed three people and injured dozens.


Saudi-led coalition and Houthis engage in a grinding battle 

Donald Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize. 
He claims to have settled eight wars.
Yet conflicts continue, and his latest declaration — “I can do whatever I want, if I want” — raises fresh questions about presidential power.
Even within MAGA, America's military involvement in Iran has exposed divisions.
Can claims of peacemaking withstand the realities of war?

Donald Trump renews his claim to global recognition as wars persist

President Donald Trump returned to Texas for the third time in less than a month to campaign for Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton, while attacking Democrats and warning about illegal immigration. The high-stakes race against Democrat James Talarico comes as Republicans pour millions of dollars into Texas ahead of the November 3 midterm elections. CNN Transcripts

Texas governor Abbott skips rally as Donald Trump campaigns for Paxton

US President Donald Trump has not made a final decision on resuming major combat operations against Iran, but the Pentagon has reportedly been ordered to prepare for possible fresh strikes. According to Axios, US Central Command has been instructed to complete preparations, with US and Israeli officials saying renewed operations could come before the November US midterm elections.


US-Iran war: Possible renewed military action between Iran and US is raising concerns 

TVK’s women’s wing has filed complaints against former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, escalating a political row in the state. The complaints have brought renewed attention to the allegations and the political confrontation surrounding the issue.


TVK's women's wing files complaints against former Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin

India has challenged Pakistan’s terrorism narrative at the United Nations, questioning Islamabad’s claims of action against terror groups and their leaders. India’s First Secretary Raghoo Puri cited Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar and questioned Pakistan’s handling of the UN-designated terrorist during a UN General Assembly debate.

Pak minister says Pakistan at forefront of global war on terror

Rahul Gandhi and opposition MPs have gathered at Rajghat following a lunch meeting, as the opposition steps up its protest over Election Commission chief Gyanesh Kumar and the ongoing political row. 

S.I.R Row: Opposition alleges vote theft & manipulation of electoral roles 

Donald Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize.And with the Norwegian Nobel Committee preparing to announce this year's winner on October 9, the American president has made another public case for why he believes he deserves the world's most prestigious peace award.His argument is straightforward: he claims to have settled eight wars.But the reality of global conflict is considerably more complicated.From Ukraine to Iran, and from Central Africa to Southeast Asia, questions remain about the durability of ceasefires, the effectiveness of diplomatic interventions and whether temporary agreements should be counted as lasting peace.And while Trump seeks international recognition for his diplomatic achievements, his latest remarks about presidential power have ignited another debate closer to home.&nbsp;<h2>Eight wars and a Nobel ambition</h2>&nbsp;Trump insists his diplomatic record is unprecedented.He has repeatedly credited his administration with resolving international disputes, facilitating agreements and preventing conflicts from escalating.His supporters point to negotiations involving countries such as Cambodia and Thailand, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and diplomatic initiatives in the Middle East.These efforts deserve examination on their individual merits.But claiming to have settled eight wars raises a different question: what constitutes a successfully resolved conflict?Fighting has resurfaced in some regions where Trump claims diplomatic success.Russia's war in Ukraine continues despite his earlier promises of a swift settlement.And the conflict involving Iran has disrupted international energy supplies, complicated regional security and raised questions about Washington's broader foreign policy objectives.Diplomatic engagement is important. So are ceasefires.But neither automatically guarantees lasting peace.&nbsp;<h2>‘I can do whatever I want’</h2>&nbsp;Perhaps the most striking contrast emerged during Trump's remarks on October 7.Asked about the possibility of another impeachment if Democrats gain control of Congress, the president turned to his political opponents.He suggested he could have taken action against Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Barack Obama but had refrained because he believed the presidency should be treated with respect.Then came the extraordinary declaration: ‘I can do whatever I want, if I want.’&nbsp;Trump linked the remark to his two previous impeachments.He was impeached twice by the House of Representatives during his first presidency and acquitted twice by the Senate.His latest comments raise a broader constitutional question about the limits of presidential authority.American presidents possess substantial executive powers, particularly in foreign policy and national security.But those powers remain subject to constitutional constraints, judicial review and congressional oversight.The distinction between political authority and personal discretion is fundamental to the American constitutional system.And it becomes particularly important when a president discusses possible action against political rivals.&nbsp;<h2>The divisions within MAGA</h2>&nbsp;Trump's foreign policy has also exposed disagreements within his own political movement.The America First message resonated with supporters who wanted Washington to reduce its involvement in prolonged overseas conflicts.Trump repeatedly criticised previous administrations for costly military interventions and promised a different approach.But the continuing confrontation with Iran has complicated that narrative.Some prominent conservative commentators and MAGA-aligned figures have questioned the administration's military strategy, warning against another open-ended conflict in the Middle East.Others argue that military pressure is necessary to protect American interests and deter adversaries.These divisions do not establish that Trump has lost the support of his political base.They do, however, reveal competing interpretations of what America First should mean.Is it a commitment to military restraint?Or does it permit forceful intervention when the administration considers American security threatened?That debate is becoming increasingly difficult to separate from Trump's wider foreign policy record.&nbsp;<h2>Peace cannot be measured by declarations alone</h2>&nbsp;There is no universally accepted formula for measuring diplomatic success.A negotiated ceasefire can save lives even when it fails to produce a permanent settlement.An agreement that reduces tensions may represent meaningful progress without ending a conflict entirely.Equally, renewed hostilities can expose the limitations of agreements celebrated prematurely.That distinction matters when evaluating Trump's claims.His administration has participated in diplomatic initiatives that supporters regard as significant achievements.Critics argue that some of those accomplishments have been overstated, particularly where violence has continued or the United States played a more limited role than the president suggests.The Nobel Committee will make its decision independently.And the award is not determined by how frequently a political leader claims to deserve it.&nbsp;<h2>The presidency, power and the pursuit of recognition</h2>&nbsp;Trump's Nobel ambitions and his latest comments about presidential authority have brought two separate debates into focus.One concerns America's contribution to international peace.The other concerns the limits of power within the United States itself.Both deserve scrutiny.A president can pursue diplomatic recognition while exercising substantial military authority. Those objectives are not inherently contradictory.But claims of peacemaking must be assessed against outcomes, just as claims of executive power must be assessed against constitutional limits.Ultimately, the important question extends beyond whether Donald Trump receives the Nobel Peace Prize.It is whether the diplomatic agreements he celebrates can produce lasting security, whether America's military commitments align with his promises, and whether presidential authority continues to operate within established constitutional boundaries.&nbsp;The Nobel Peace Prize recognises contributions to peace.It does not confer unlimited presidential authority.And those are two very different things.

Some prominent conservative commentators and MAGA-aligned figures have questioned the administration's military strategy, warning against another open-ended conflict in the Middle East. Others argue that military pressure is necessary to protect American interests and deter adversaries.

Donald Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize. And with the Norwegian Nobel Committee preparing to announce this year's winner on October 9, the American president has made another public case for why he believes he deserves the world's most prestigious peace award. His argument is straightforward: he claims to have settled eight wars. But the reality of global conflict is considerably more complicated. From Ukraine to Iran, and from Central Africa to Southeast Asia, questions remain about the durability of ceasefires, the effectiveness of diplomatic interventions and whether temporary agreements should be counted as lasting peace. And while Trump seeks international recognition for his diplomatic achievements, his latest remarks about presidential power have ignited another debate closer to home. Eight wars and a Nobel ambition Trump insists his diplomatic record is unprecedented. He has repeatedly credited his administration with resolving international disputes, facilitating agreements and preventing conflicts from escalating. His supporters point to negotiations involving countries such as Cambodia and Thailand, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and diplomatic initiatives in the Middle East. These efforts deserve examination on their individual merits. But claiming to have settled eight wars raises a different question: what constitutes a successfully resolved conflict? Fighting has resurfaced in some regions where Trump claims diplomatic success. Russia's war in Ukraine continues despite his earlier promises of a swift settlement. And the conflict involving Iran has disrupted international energy supplies, complicated regional security and raised questions about Washington's broader foreign policy objectives. Diplomatic engagement is important. So are ceasefires. But neither automatically guarantees lasting peace. ‘I can do whatever I want’ Perhaps the most striking contrast emerged during Trump's remarks on October 7. Asked about the possibility of another impeachment if Democrats gain control of Congress, the president turned to his political opponents. He suggested he could have taken action against Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Barack Obama but had refrained because he believed the presidency should be treated with respect. Then came the extraordinary declaration: ‘I can do whatever I want, if I want.’ Trump linked the remark to his two previous impeachments. He was impeached twice by the House of Representatives during his first presidency and acquitted twice by the Senate. His latest comments raise a broader constitutional question about the limits of presidential authority. American presidents possess substantial executive powers, particularly in foreign policy and national security. But those powers remain subject to constitutional constraints, judicial review and congressional oversight. The distinction between political authority and personal discretion is fundamental to the American constitutional system. And it becomes particularly important when a president discusses possible action against political rivals. The divisions within MAGA Trump's foreign policy has also exposed disagreements within his own political movement. The America First message resonated with supporters who wanted Washington to reduce its involvement in prolonged overseas conflicts. Trump repeatedly criticised previous administrations for costly military interventions and promised a different approach. But the continuing confrontation with Iran has complicated that narrative. Some prominent conservative commentators and MAGA-aligned figures have questioned the administration's military strategy, warning against another open-ended conflict in the Middle East. Others argue that military pressure is necessary to protect American interests and deter adversaries. These divisions do not establish that Trump has lost the support of his political base. They do, however, reveal competing interpretations of what America First should mean. Is it a commitment to military restraint? Or does it permit forceful intervention when the administration considers American security threatened? That debate is becoming increasingly difficult to separate from Trump's wider foreign policy record. Peace cannot be measured by declarations alone There is no universally accepted formula for measuring diplomatic success. A negotiated ceasefire can save lives even when it fails to produce a permanent settlement. An agreement that reduces tensions may represent meaningful progress without ending a conflict entirely. Equally, renewed hostilities can expose the limitations of agreements celebrated prematurely. That distinction matters when evaluating Trump's claims. His administration has participated in diplomatic initiatives that supporters regard as significant achievements. Critics argue that some of those accomplishments have been overstated, particularly where violence has continued or the United States played a more limited role than the president suggests. The Nobel Committee will make its decision independently. And the award is not determined by how frequently a political leader claims to deserve it. The presidency, power and the pursuit of recognition Trump's Nobel ambitions and his latest comments about presidential authority have brought two separate debates into focus. One concerns America's contribution to international peace. The other concerns the limits of power within the United States itself. Both deserve scrutiny. A president can pursue diplomatic recognition while exercising substantial military authority. Those objectives are not inherently contradictory. But claims of peacemaking must be assessed against outcomes, just as claims of executive power must be assessed against constitutional limits. Ultimately, the important question extends beyond whether Donald Trump receives the Nobel Peace Prize. It is whether the diplomatic agreements he celebrates can produce lasting security, whether America's military commitments align with his promises, and whether presidential authority continues to operate within established constitutional boundaries. The Nobel Peace Prize recognises contributions to peace. It does not confer unlimited presidential authority. And those are two very different things.

Some prominent conservative commentators and MAGA-aligned figures have questioned the administration's military strategy, warning against another open-ended conflict in the Middle East. Others argue that military pressure is necessary to protect American interests and deter adversaries.

The Verdict | Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize. But what about the wars?

The first world, as they like to call themselves, has often looked down upon the rest of the world. Yet, today France is seeing unprecedented protests over problems that should not have been there in a developed country.&nbsp;What began as a Gen Z protest against the shortage of teachers, lack of facilities and overcrowded classrooms has turned into a full-blown political war with violence, burning schools and damaging infrastructure at the centre of it. 30% of the country's 3,600 high schools were affected at the start of this month. So far, 215 students and 85 school staff members have been injured in clashes.&nbsp;Adding fuel to this is the rising anger against immigrants. Many in France say it is they who are resorting to violence. U.S. President Donald Trump even said, and I quote: "This isn't about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great country!"&nbsp;The French government says its the leftists who have infiltrated these protests.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/black-day-for-democracy-says-congress-after-mps-detained-announces-nationwide-protests-on-oct-8-1791394070240">‘Black Day for democracy’, says Congress after MPs detained; announces nationwide protests on Oct 8</a>&nbsp;So who is responsible? Well, successive French governments have received complaints about underfunding and teachers' workload. Then there is a massive difference between the elite private and the public schools. No government did much, and those who tried to faced the wrath of teachers' unions, who blocked systemic overhauls.&nbsp;France's education ministry found that during the 2024-2025 school year, about 10% of teaching hours went untaught in public secondary schools. About 7.5% of the lost hours were due to a failure to find substitutes.&nbsp;Genuine apolitical protests, almost always, end up becoming heavily political. So now, it's up to President Macron and PM Lecornu to weed out the infiltrators and listen to the students.

France's Gen Z-led protests over teacher shortages, poor facilities and overcrowded classrooms have escalated into violent and politically charged unrest.

The first world, as they like to call themselves, has often looked down upon the rest of the world. Yet, today France is seeing unprecedented protests over problems that should not have been there in a developed country. What began as a Gen Z protest against the shortage of teachers, lack of facilities and overcrowded classrooms has turned into a full-blown political war with violence, burning schools and damaging infrastructure at the centre of it. 30% of the country's 3,600 high schools were affected at the start of this month. So far, 215 students and 85 school staff members have been injured in clashes. Adding fuel to this is the rising anger against immigrants. Many in France say it is they who are resorting to violence. U.S. President Donald Trump even said, and I quote: "This isn't about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great country!" The French government says its the leftists who have infiltrated these protests. Also Read: ‘Black Day for democracy’, says Congress after MPs detained; announces nationwide protests on Oct 8 So who is responsible? Well, successive French governments have received complaints about underfunding and teachers' workload. Then there is a massive difference between the elite private and the public schools. No government did much, and those who tried to faced the wrath of teachers' unions, who blocked systemic overhauls. France's education ministry found that during the 2024-2025 school year, about 10% of teaching hours went untaught in public secondary schools. About 7.5% of the lost hours were due to a failure to find substitutes. Genuine apolitical protests, almost always, end up becoming heavily political. So now, it's up to President Macron and PM Lecornu to weed out the infiltrators and listen to the students.

France's Gen Z-led protests over teacher shortages, poor facilities and overcrowded classrooms have escalated into violent and politically charged unrest.

France protests: How a Gen Z school movement turned into a political war | The Verdict

Kosovo has elected a new president, easing a political deadlock that had fuelled tensions in parliament and raised concerns over protests. The vote came as demonstrations were held against the convictions of former Kosovo Liberation Army leaders, coinciding with a midnight deadline to elect a president.

Kosovo: 73-year-old Justina Shiroka Pula elected as president | Race To Power

As the November 3 midterms approach, President Donald Trump and senior officials are portraying the Iran war as nearing its final stage, with fighting expected to end after the US vote. The administration also predicts a subsequent decline in global oil prices.

Trump administration's collective message over Iran as midterm approaches | Race To Power

The Houthis fired missiles at Aden International Airport as fighting with Saudi-backed forces intensified across Yemen. Saudi Arabia responded with airstrikes on Sanaa and northern Yemen, while Riyadh said it intercepted Houthi missiles targeting Khamis Mushait and areas north of the Saudi capital. Saudi-backed forces are pushing toward the strategic Bab al-Mandeb Strait as the conflict threatens to spill further into the Red Sea and Gulf.

Houthis launch attacks on Aden as Yemeni forces claim battlefield advance | Race To Power

Israelis observed a moment of silence on Wednesday to mark three years since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack. A UN inquiry said the assault killed around 1,200 people and saw 252 others taken hostage, marking one of the deadliest days in Israel’s recent history.

Israelis pay tribute to the victims of Hamas attack | Race To Power

Turkiye, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have agreed to activate “deterrence measures” under a mutual defence pact and rapidly deploy forces to the Gulf kingdom to counter attacks by Yemen’s Houthis.

The decision was announced on Monday after the three countries’ defence and foreign ministers held an emergency meeting in Riyadh. It marked the first time the alliance – known as the Mecca Alliance for Defence – has been invoked since it was signed on August 7.

Houthis say Saudi airspace no longer safe, deny any advances by Yemen's government forces

After clashing with Settlements Minister Strock over extremist settlers’ West Bank attacks on Palestinian civilians, Zini warns he may reinstate administrative detention for Jewish suspects, reversing previous stance


Shin bet chief clashes with top minister over settler violence in West Bank

Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Mohan Yadav described the state’s flagship Ladli Behna Scheme as a “very costly affair”, citing the significant financial burden it places on the state treasury. The scheme provides financial assistance to eligible women across Madhya Pradesh.

Madhya Pradesh CM Mohan Yadav calls Ladli Behna Scheme a 'costly affair'

US President Donald Trump’s approval rating fell to a career-low 32% in a Reuters/Ipsos poll, down from 35% the previous week. The poll found growing dissatisfaction with his handling of the cost of living and the Iran war, with the findings coming weeks before the November 3 midterm elections.

Donald Trump's approval hits new low a month ahead of midterm elections 

Tens of thousands of students, teachers and parents have taken to the streets across France, blockading hundreds of high schools in cities including Paris, Bordeaux, Marseille, Nantes, Lyon and Strasbourg. The protests mark the biggest escalation yet in the country’s growing education crisis.

France: Students stage school blockades in major French cities like Paris, Bordeaux, Marseille

Donald Trump wants Americans to vote in November as though his name were on the ballot.Republicans may want to consider carefully what that means.At a campaign rally in Nebraska, the US president once again placed himself at the centre of the Republican midterm campaign. But it was another extraordinary remark that quickly dominated the headlines.Speaking about the war with Iran, Trump joked about allowing Tehran to “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego — two Democratic strongholds in California.The backlash was swift.California Governor Gavin Newsom and the mayors of both cities condemned the remarks, turning what was supposed to be another Republican campaign stop into another controversy over Trump himself.And therein lies the problem.Trump remains the undisputed centre of Republican politics. He commands enormous loyalty among the party's base, dominates media attention and can turn an otherwise ordinary campaign rally into an international headline.But attention and persuasion are not necessarily the same thing.And with the midterm elections approaching, Republicans need more than the voters already committed to Donald Trump.&nbsp;<h2>From campaign asset to campaign complication?</h2>&nbsp;Trump's latest Reuters/Ipsos approval rating stands at 32 percent.In the same poll, registered voters preferred Democratic congressional candidates to Republican candidates by 44 percent to 37 percent.That is only one national poll and congressional elections will ultimately be decided district by district and state by state. But it illustrates why the president's campaign appearances matter.Trump himself has effectively acknowledged the stakes.In Nebraska, he urged Republicans to vote as though he personally were on the ballot.That strategy may energise MAGA loyalists.It could also nationalise hundreds of congressional races around one extraordinarily polarising political figure.Instead of Republican candidates talking primarily about their districts, affordability, immigration, security or the economy, every Trump controversy risks forcing them to answer questions about something the president has said.&nbsp;<h2>Even mail-in voting is back</h2>&nbsp;Perhaps nothing illustrates the changing political calculation better than Trump's message on postal voting.For years, Trump attacked mail-in voting, repeatedly associating it with electoral fraud despite the absence of evidence supporting claims of widespread fraud capable of changing national election results.Now his message is different.“Vote early, vote by mail or vote in person,” Trump told supporters.Republicans have increasingly encouraged early and postal voting as they seek to maximise turnout.Strategically, that makes sense.Politically, however, it exposes an uncomfortable contradiction.If mail-in voting was supposedly so dangerous when Democrats used it effectively, why is it acceptable when Republicans need every possible vote?The answer may be less ideological than electoral.November is getting closer.&nbsp;<h2>The politics of provocation</h2>&nbsp;Trump's defenders will argue that his California comments were typical Trump — provocative humour intended to entertain supporters rather than a serious suggestion that Iran should attack American cities.His critics see something far more troubling: an American president making light of foreign attacks against millions of Americans because they live in overwhelmingly Democratic territory.Either way, the controversy demonstrates the political risk of Trump's campaign style.The United States remains deeply polarised.Americans are dealing with questions about affordability, foreign wars, immigration, jobs and the economy.Against that backdrop, Republicans must decide whether another headline about Trump's rhetoric helps them communicate their own message — or buries it.&nbsp;<h2>Trump is effectively on the ballot</h2>&nbsp;There is also a deeper irony.Midterm elections traditionally become judgments on the president occupying the White House.Trump is now explicitly encouraging that dynamic.He wants Republicans to imagine that his name appears beside every congressional candidate.Perhaps his supporters will.But so might his opponents.That is the gamble.Donald Trump remains capable of electrifying the Republican base in a way few politicians can.But elections are not won merely by exciting people who already agree with you.They require persuasion beyond the faithful.Trump wants November to become a referendum on Donald Trump.Republicans may discover that getting exactly what the president asked for is the biggest gamble of all.

President Donald Trump remains the undisputed centre of Republican politics. He commands enormous loyalty among the party's base, dominates media attention and can turn an otherwise ordinary campaign rally into an international headline.

Donald Trump wants Americans to vote in November as though his name were on the ballot. Republicans may want to consider carefully what that means. At a campaign rally in Nebraska, the US president once again placed himself at the centre of the Republican midterm campaign. But it was another extraordinary remark that quickly dominated the headlines. Speaking about the war with Iran, Trump joked about allowing Tehran to “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego — two Democratic strongholds in California. The backlash was swift. California Governor Gavin Newsom and the mayors of both cities condemned the remarks, turning what was supposed to be another Republican campaign stop into another controversy over Trump himself. And therein lies the problem. Trump remains the undisputed centre of Republican politics. He commands enormous loyalty among the party's base, dominates media attention and can turn an otherwise ordinary campaign rally into an international headline. But attention and persuasion are not necessarily the same thing. And with the midterm elections approaching, Republicans need more than the voters already committed to Donald Trump. From campaign asset to campaign complication? Trump's latest Reuters/Ipsos approval rating stands at 32 percent. In the same poll, registered voters preferred Democratic congressional candidates to Republican candidates by 44 percent to 37 percent. That is only one national poll and congressional elections will ultimately be decided district by district and state by state. But it illustrates why the president's campaign appearances matter. Trump himself has effectively acknowledged the stakes. In Nebraska, he urged Republicans to vote as though he personally were on the ballot. That strategy may energise MAGA loyalists. It could also nationalise hundreds of congressional races around one extraordinarily polarising political figure. Instead of Republican candidates talking primarily about their districts, affordability, immigration, security or the economy, every Trump controversy risks forcing them to answer questions about something the president has said. Even mail-in voting is back Perhaps nothing illustrates the changing political calculation better than Trump's message on postal voting. For years, Trump attacked mail-in voting, repeatedly associating it with electoral fraud despite the absence of evidence supporting claims of widespread fraud capable of changing national election results. Now his message is different. “Vote early, vote by mail or vote in person,” Trump told supporters. Republicans have increasingly encouraged early and postal voting as they seek to maximise turnout. Strategically, that makes sense. Politically, however, it exposes an uncomfortable contradiction. If mail-in voting was supposedly so dangerous when Democrats used it effectively, why is it acceptable when Republicans need every possible vote? The answer may be less ideological than electoral. November is getting closer. The politics of provocation Trump's defenders will argue that his California comments were typical Trump — provocative humour intended to entertain supporters rather than a serious suggestion that Iran should attack American cities. His critics see something far more troubling: an American president making light of foreign attacks against millions of Americans because they live in overwhelmingly Democratic territory. Either way, the controversy demonstrates the political risk of Trump's campaign style. The United States remains deeply polarised. Americans are dealing with questions about affordability, foreign wars, immigration, jobs and the economy. Against that backdrop, Republicans must decide whether another headline about Trump's rhetoric helps them communicate their own message — or buries it. Trump is effectively on the ballot There is also a deeper irony. Midterm elections traditionally become judgments on the president occupying the White House. Trump is now explicitly encouraging that dynamic. He wants Republicans to imagine that his name appears beside every congressional candidate. Perhaps his supporters will. But so might his opponents. That is the gamble. Donald Trump remains capable of electrifying the Republican base in a way few politicians can. But elections are not won merely by exciting people who already agree with you. They require persuasion beyond the faithful. Trump wants November to become a referendum on Donald Trump. Republicans may discover that getting exactly what the president asked for is the biggest gamble of all.

President Donald Trump remains the undisputed centre of Republican politics. He commands enormous loyalty among the party's base, dominates media attention and can turn an otherwise ordinary campaign rally into an international headline.

The Verdict | Trump wants the midterms to be about him. Republicans may regret it

Is Brazil headed towards a complete shift to the right?The answer to this will decide the course of South America's political journey.The battle between Brazil’s veteran left-wing leader and current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of former President Jair Bolsonaro, is inching closer to a conclusion.After the first round, it is Flavio Bolsonaro who has entered the runoff with the lead.With virtually all votes counted, Flavio secured about 47% of the valid vote, compared with roughly 45% for Lula.With no outright winner, Brazil now heads for a decisive second round on October 25.Beyond the numbers, it is also a contest over what political direction Brazil and Latin America take next.It is Bolsonaro's Liberal Party versus Lula's Workers' Party.If Flavio Bolsonaro's surname is his biggest political asset, it is a challenge too because he has to live up to how his father, Jair Bolsonaro, transformed Brazil's conservative movement.Jair Bolsonaro was later convicted over a plot to overturn the 2022 election result, which he lost to Lula, and is now serving a 27-year prison sentence.His son has taken up the political mantle, and Flavio's first-round performance shows that the Bolsonaro political brand remains a significant force in Brazil.So what does Flávio Bolsonaro's rise mean for Brazil's relationship with Donald Trump?The US president has made no secret of his interest in Brazil's political direction.Trump has hosted Flávio Bolsonaro at the White House and has publicly praised him, calling him quite: "A smart young man who loves his country very much."On the other hand, his relationship with Lula has become increasingly complicated over tariffs.The Trump administration imposed additional tariffs on Brazilian imports, affecting a significant portion of Brazil's exports to the United States.Lula accused Washington of interfering in Brazil's affairs. Suddenly, an election inside Brazil became entangled with a much larger argument: who gets to decide Brazil's political and economic future?Lula's message has increasingly been that Brazil should not allow foreign governments to dictate its choices. This argument has particular resonance because Trump's administration has become more openly aligned with conservative political forces across Latin America.But in contrast, Flavio represents a very different foreign-policy orientation. His campaign has positioned itself closer to the conservative governments and movements that have been gaining ground across the region.The campaign has revolved heavily around crime, the cost of living, corruption, household debt and concerns about public finances.Brazil's economy has continued to grow, and unemployment and inequality have improved, but concerns over living costs and government debt remain politically important.After the first round, Flavio declared that Brazil was witnessing the "end of the era" of Lula's Workers' Party.Lula, meanwhile, has another campaign to fight. At 80, he is seeking an unprecedented fourth non-consecutive presidential term. His response after the result was straightforward: the first campaign is over; a new campaign begins now.Flávio has momentum; Lula has experience.Neither has won yet.All eyes are now on October 25 as the battle between two political legacies unfolds.

Brazil heads for a decisive runoff between Lula and Flavio Bolsonaro as voters weigh competing political legacies and the country's future direction.

Is Brazil headed towards a complete shift to the right? The answer to this will decide the course of South America's political journey. The battle between Brazil’s veteran left-wing leader and current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of former President Jair Bolsonaro, is inching closer to a conclusion. After the first round, it is Flavio Bolsonaro who has entered the runoff with the lead. With virtually all votes counted, Flavio secured about 47% of the valid vote, compared with roughly 45% for Lula. With no outright winner, Brazil now heads for a decisive second round on October 25. Beyond the numbers, it is also a contest over what political direction Brazil and Latin America take next. It is Bolsonaro's Liberal Party versus Lula's Workers' Party. If Flavio Bolsonaro's surname is his biggest political asset, it is a challenge too because he has to live up to how his father, Jair Bolsonaro, transformed Brazil's conservative movement. Jair Bolsonaro was later convicted over a plot to overturn the 2022 election result, which he lost to Lula, and is now serving a 27-year prison sentence. His son has taken up the political mantle, and Flavio's first-round performance shows that the Bolsonaro political brand remains a significant force in Brazil. So what does Flávio Bolsonaro's rise mean for Brazil's relationship with Donald Trump? The US president has made no secret of his interest in Brazil's political direction. Trump has hosted Flávio Bolsonaro at the White House and has publicly praised him, calling him quite: "A smart young man who loves his country very much." On the other hand, his relationship with Lula has become increasingly complicated over tariffs. The Trump administration imposed additional tariffs on Brazilian imports, affecting a significant portion of Brazil's exports to the United States. Lula accused Washington of interfering in Brazil's affairs. Suddenly, an election inside Brazil became entangled with a much larger argument: who gets to decide Brazil's political and economic future? Lula's message has increasingly been that Brazil should not allow foreign governments to dictate its choices. This argument has particular resonance because Trump's administration has become more openly aligned with conservative political forces across Latin America. But in contrast, Flavio represents a very different foreign-policy orientation. His campaign has positioned itself closer to the conservative governments and movements that have been gaining ground across the region. The campaign has revolved heavily around crime, the cost of living, corruption, household debt and concerns about public finances. Brazil's economy has continued to grow, and unemployment and inequality have improved, but concerns over living costs and government debt remain politically important. After the first round, Flavio declared that Brazil was witnessing the "end of the era" of Lula's Workers' Party. Lula, meanwhile, has another campaign to fight. At 80, he is seeking an unprecedented fourth non-consecutive presidential term. His response after the result was straightforward: the first campaign is over; a new campaign begins now. Flávio has momentum; Lula has experience. Neither has won yet. All eyes are now on October 25 as the battle between two political legacies unfolds.

Brazil heads for a decisive runoff between Lula and Flavio Bolsonaro as voters weigh competing political legacies and the country's future direction.

Is Brazil headed towards a complete shift to the right? Lula vs Bolsonaro | Race To Power

Brazil’s presidential election is headed for a runoff after Flávio Bolsonaro finished ahead of incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in the first round. The October 25 contest comes as Bolsonaro’s political movement also made major gains in Congress, with family members including Michelle Bolsonaro, Carlos Bolsonaro and Jair Renan Bolsonaro winning seats.


Son of Jair Bolsonaro enters Brazil's runoff elections with a lead

At least nine Israelis from families affected by the October 7 Hamas attack are entering Israel’s upcoming election race, with candidates from across the political spectrum seeking to influence the country’s future and bridge deep political and social divisions.

Israel: 9 families affected by October 7 attack join election race ahead of polls

Jair Bolsonaro is behind bars. His name was not on Brazil's presidential ballot. But if the first round of Brazil's election proved anything, it is that Bolsonaro's political movement is nowhere near dead.His son, Flávio Bolsonaro, has stormed into the presidential runoff after securing just over 47 percent of the valid vote, finishing ahead of incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who received just over 45 percent.The two will now meet again on October 25.On paper, this is Lula versus Flávio Bolsonaro.Politically, it is something much bigger.It is a referendum on whether Bolsonaroism can outlive Bolsonaro.&nbsp;<h2>A surname becomes a political movement</h2>&nbsp;Four years ago, Lula narrowly defeated Jair Bolsonaro for the presidency. Bolsonaro would subsequently be convicted over an attempt to overturn that result and sentenced to 27 years in prison.For Bolsonaro's opponents, his downfall appeared to offer an opportunity to turn the page.Instead, his son is now within touching distance of the presidency.That should force Brazil's political establishment to confront an uncomfortable reality: removing a politician does not necessarily remove the grievances that created his movement.Flávio Bolsonaro's performance cannot simply be explained by loyalty to his father.Brazilian voters remain concerned about the cost of living, public security, corruption, household debt and the direction of the economy. Lula's government can point to improvements in unemployment and inequality, but statistics do not always translate into how voters feel at the supermarket, at home or on the streets.That disconnect has created fertile ground for the Brazilian right.&nbsp;<h2>Brazil's Trump connection</h2>&nbsp;There is also an international dimension.Flávio Bolsonaro is politically aligned with US President Donald Trump, who has publicly praised him. Lula, meanwhile, has accused Washington of attempting to interfere in Brazil's politics — allegations the United States has rejected.But the more important story extends beyond Trump himself.Across Latin America, voters in several countries have recently turned towards right-wing governments and candidates promising tougher security policies, economic reform and a rejection of established political elites.Brazil may now become the biggest prize in that political realignment.Latin America's largest economy choosing another Bolsonaro would reverberate far beyond Brasília — from Washington to Beijing and across the Global South.&nbsp;<h2>But Flávio is not Jair</h2>&nbsp;The Bolsonaro name is both Flávio's greatest political asset and potentially his greatest weakness.It gives him an enormous, already mobilised conservative base. But it also brings the baggage of his father's presidency, the attempted coup case and years of bitter political polarisation.The runoff therefore presents Flávio with an intriguing challenge.He must inherit his father's voters without becoming imprisoned by his father's politics.Lula faces the opposite problem.At 80, the veteran leftist must convince Brazilians that his experience remains an asset rather than evidence that the country's politics has become trapped between two familiar political dynasties.And that may ultimately be the most fascinating feature of this election.Brazil is being offered change — but through one of the most recognisable surnames in Brazilian politics.&nbsp;<h2>Bolsonaroism survives</h2>&nbsp;Whatever happens on October 25, the first round has already delivered a political lesson extending far beyond Brazil.Political movements rarely disappear simply because their leaders fall.Donald Trump survived impeachment, prosecution and political defeat. Populist movements across Europe have survived bans, scandals and leadership changes. And now Brazil is discovering that Bolsonaroism does not necessarily require Jair Bolsonaro standing on the ballot.That does not mean Flávio Bolsonaro has won.A runoff is a different election. Alliances shift. Tactical voting intensifies. Voters who supported eliminated candidates must choose again.Lula still has a path back.But the assumption that Jair Bolsonaro's imprisonment would consign his movement to history has already been demolished.Brazil has separated the politician from the politics.Jair Bolsonaro may be behind bars.Bolsonaroism is not.

Lula's government can point to improvements in unemployment and inequality, but statistics do not always translate into how voters feel at the supermarket, at home or on the streets. That disconnect has created fertile ground for the Brazilian right.

Jair Bolsonaro is behind bars. His name was not on Brazil's presidential ballot. But if the first round of Brazil's election proved anything, it is that Bolsonaro's political movement is nowhere near dead. His son, Flávio Bolsonaro, has stormed into the presidential runoff after securing just over 47 percent of the valid vote, finishing ahead of incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who received just over 45 percent. The two will now meet again on October 25. On paper, this is Lula versus Flávio Bolsonaro. Politically, it is something much bigger. It is a referendum on whether Bolsonaroism can outlive Bolsonaro. A surname becomes a political movement Four years ago, Lula narrowly defeated Jair Bolsonaro for the presidency. Bolsonaro would subsequently be convicted over an attempt to overturn that result and sentenced to 27 years in prison. For Bolsonaro's opponents, his downfall appeared to offer an opportunity to turn the page. Instead, his son is now within touching distance of the presidency. That should force Brazil's political establishment to confront an uncomfortable reality: removing a politician does not necessarily remove the grievances that created his movement. Flávio Bolsonaro's performance cannot simply be explained by loyalty to his father. Brazilian voters remain concerned about the cost of living, public security, corruption, household debt and the direction of the economy. Lula's government can point to improvements in unemployment and inequality, but statistics do not always translate into how voters feel at the supermarket, at home or on the streets. That disconnect has created fertile ground for the Brazilian right. Brazil's Trump connection There is also an international dimension. Flávio Bolsonaro is politically aligned with US President Donald Trump, who has publicly praised him. Lula, meanwhile, has accused Washington of attempting to interfere in Brazil's politics — allegations the United States has rejected. But the more important story extends beyond Trump himself. Across Latin America, voters in several countries have recently turned towards right-wing governments and candidates promising tougher security policies, economic reform and a rejection of established political elites. Brazil may now become the biggest prize in that political realignment. Latin America's largest economy choosing another Bolsonaro would reverberate far beyond Brasília — from Washington to Beijing and across the Global South. But Flávio is not Jair The Bolsonaro name is both Flávio's greatest political asset and potentially his greatest weakness. It gives him an enormous, already mobilised conservative base. But it also brings the baggage of his father's presidency, the attempted coup case and years of bitter political polarisation. The runoff therefore presents Flávio with an intriguing challenge. He must inherit his father's voters without becoming imprisoned by his father's politics. Lula faces the opposite problem. At 80, the veteran leftist must convince Brazilians that his experience remains an asset rather than evidence that the country's politics has become trapped between two familiar political dynasties. And that may ultimately be the most fascinating feature of this election. Brazil is being offered change — but through one of the most recognisable surnames in Brazilian politics. Bolsonaroism survives Whatever happens on October 25, the first round has already delivered a political lesson extending far beyond Brazil. Political movements rarely disappear simply because their leaders fall. Donald Trump survived impeachment, prosecution and political defeat. Populist movements across Europe have survived bans, scandals and leadership changes. And now Brazil is discovering that Bolsonaroism does not necessarily require Jair Bolsonaro standing on the ballot. That does not mean Flávio Bolsonaro has won. A runoff is a different election. Alliances shift. Tactical voting intensifies. Voters who supported eliminated candidates must choose again. Lula still has a path back. But the assumption that Jair Bolsonaro's imprisonment would consign his movement to history has already been demolished. Brazil has separated the politician from the politics. Jair Bolsonaro may be behind bars. Bolsonaroism is not.

Lula's government can point to improvements in unemployment and inequality, but statistics do not always translate into how voters feel at the supermarket, at home or on the streets. That disconnect has created fertile ground for the Brazilian right.

The Verdict | You can jail Bolsonaro, but can you kill Bolsonaroism?

The row over the revision of electoral rolls in India has taken a dramatic new turn, with protests unfolding across the country. Over two months after the Cockroach Janta Party led a protest for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, the youth pressure group is back on the streets, this time in India's financial capital, Mumbai, gunning for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.&nbsp;Thousands have gathered at Mumbai's Shivaji Park, demanding the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar.&nbsp;Quirky posters and satirical memes have flooded the protest site, even as protesters waive the tricolour and raise slogans against the Chief Election Commissioner. Heavy security has been deployed in and around Shivaji Park, with additional police personnel and barricades in place.&nbsp;Several prominent names from the film and music industry also showed up at the protest. Actor Naseeruddin Shah, Shabana Azmi, and singer Vishal Dadlani were among those in attendance.&nbsp;Protests also erupted in the national capital earlier in the day.&nbsp;Leaders from the Aam Aadmi Party and several student organisations attempted to stage a protest at Jantar Mantar, but were detained by the Delhi Police.&nbsp;In Patna, India bloc allies, the Rashtriya Janata Dal and the CPI(ML) also held a protest.&nbsp;The protests follow an investigative report which highlighted an unprecedented rupture inside the Election Commission, with two Election Commissioners recording multiple objections over key SIR-related decisions.&nbsp;Protesters argue that the controversial exercise has been designed to delete a large number of genuine voters from electoral rolls.&nbsp;The CJP has accused the Chief Election Commissioner of treason and is pressing for his resignation. The Mumbai protest is part of a wider CJP campaign against SIR. The party plans to take the agitation to Goa, Bengaluru and Kolkata.&nbsp;However, the Bharatiya Janata Party has hit out at the CJP for peddling a fake narrative.&nbsp;Speaking to the media, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the group's fake narrative has been exposed by the Election Commission.&nbsp;Meanwhile, India's poll body has announced a special drive to enrol voters left out of the electoral rolls in 20 states and Union Territories where the SIR exercise has been completed.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/at-least-five-dead-after-mine-collapse-in-turkey-as-authorities-launch-negligence-investigation-1790964669889">At least five dead after mine collapse in Turkey as authorities launch negligence investigation</a>&nbsp;Officials have been directed to compare pre-SIR rolls with post-SIR rolls, and identify those who have been left out. Of these 20 states and Union Territories, elections have already been completed in at least four states: West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar.&nbsp;In Maharashtra, which is the largest state where the SIR exercise is still underway, officials have been directed not to delete any voter in haste.&nbsp;Earlier this week, the poll body rolled back a contentious change in Form 6 in states where the SIR exercise has been completed. Additionally, it has also instructed officials to set up special camps for adding voters to electoral rolls.

Protests erupted across Mumbai, Delhi and Patna over the SIR electoral roll revision as the CJP demanded Gyanesh Kumar's resignation, while the Election Commission announced measures to enrol voters left out of the rolls.

The row over the revision of electoral rolls in India has taken a dramatic new turn, with protests unfolding across the country. Over two months after the Cockroach Janta Party led a protest for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, the youth pressure group is back on the streets, this time in India's financial capital, Mumbai, gunning for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Thousands have gathered at Mumbai's Shivaji Park, demanding the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar. Quirky posters and satirical memes have flooded the protest site, even as protesters waive the tricolour and raise slogans against the Chief Election Commissioner. Heavy security has been deployed in and around Shivaji Park, with additional police personnel and barricades in place. Several prominent names from the film and music industry also showed up at the protest. Actor Naseeruddin Shah, Shabana Azmi, and singer Vishal Dadlani were among those in attendance. Protests also erupted in the national capital earlier in the day. Leaders from the Aam Aadmi Party and several student organisations attempted to stage a protest at Jantar Mantar, but were detained by the Delhi Police. In Patna, India bloc allies, the Rashtriya Janata Dal and the CPI(ML) also held a protest. The protests follow an investigative report which highlighted an unprecedented rupture inside the Election Commission, with two Election Commissioners recording multiple objections over key SIR-related decisions. Protesters argue that the controversial exercise has been designed to delete a large number of genuine voters from electoral rolls. The CJP has accused the Chief Election Commissioner of treason and is pressing for his resignation. The Mumbai protest is part of a wider CJP campaign against SIR. The party plans to take the agitation to Goa, Bengaluru and Kolkata. However, the Bharatiya Janata Party has hit out at the CJP for peddling a fake narrative. Speaking to the media, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the group's fake narrative has been exposed by the Election Commission. Meanwhile, India's poll body has announced a special drive to enrol voters left out of the electoral rolls in 20 states and Union Territories where the SIR exercise has been completed. Also Read: At least five dead after mine collapse in Turkey as authorities launch negligence investigation Officials have been directed to compare pre-SIR rolls with post-SIR rolls, and identify those who have been left out. Of these 20 states and Union Territories, elections have already been completed in at least four states: West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar. In Maharashtra, which is the largest state where the SIR exercise is still underway, officials have been directed not to delete any voter in haste. Earlier this week, the poll body rolled back a contentious change in Form 6 in states where the SIR exercise has been completed. Additionally, it has also instructed officials to set up special camps for adding voters to electoral rolls.

Protests erupted across Mumbai, Delhi and Patna over the SIR electoral roll revision as the CJP demanded Gyanesh Kumar's resignation, while the Election Commission announced measures to enrol voters left out of the rolls.

SIR row: Opposition takes to streets against CEC in Delhi; CJP protest in Mumbai | RTP

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that Moscow could use “all weapons at our country’s disposal” if Kaliningrad or any other Russian territory comes under direct attack. Speaking at the Valdai Discussion Club, Putin issued the warning amid rising tensions over Russia’s western exclave.

Vladimir Putin threatens to unleash entire Russian arsenal if Europe attacks Kaliningrad

race-to-power

Race To Power, News on Race To Power, stories on Race To Power, articles on Race To Power, Race To Power stories at Wion, Race To Power news, Race To Power latest news

race to-power