National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

The escalating military confrontation between Iran and the United States has sent shockwaves through global aviation, grounding key flights across the West Asia and forcing airlines to absorb mounting costs from longer detours, suspended routes, and disrupted schedules. After Iran fired missiles at the US Al Udeid airbase in Qatar on Monday, airlines across Europe, Asia, and the West Asia moved swiftly to cancel or reroute dozens of flights, triggering a ripple effect across global travel.&nbsp;As per Reuters, the missile attack, claimed by Iran as retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear facilities—temporarily closed Qatar’s airspace and disrupted operations at Doha’s Hamad International Airport, a critical global hub. The UAE also paused flights at Dubai International Airport, the world’s busiest international terminal.<h2>Over 30 airlines affected as Gulf airspace shuts down</h2>According to aviation data firms Cirium and Flightradar24, more than 20 commercial aircraft bound for Doha were diverted mid-air. Another four heading to Dubai turned back. Meanwhile, Bahrain temporarily closed its airspace, adding to the bottleneck.&nbsp;Major carriers including British Airways, Japan Airlines, Finnair, Iberia, Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Air India either suspended or rerouted flights.&nbsp;Air India confirmed on Monday it had halted operations to the West Asia, as well as flights to Europe and the US East Coast, until further notice. Some flights were returned to their origin airports, others diverted, and many were re-routed over alternate corridors.<h2>The rising cost of disruption: More fuel, crew and delays</h2>For airlines, the cost impact is already visible.&nbsp;Aviation analyst John Strickland, as quoted by BBC, said detours add significant fuel expenses, reduce aircraft availability, and disrupt crew schedules. “Each longer routing increases operational costs sharply. Airlines must account for fuel burn, flight timing limitations, and legal crew rest requirements.”&nbsp;In financial terms, airlines could face cost increases of 10–15 per cent per affected flight, industry insiders told CNBC. Rerouting flights north via Turkey or south over Saudi Arabia adds up to 90 minutes of flying time, reducing daily aircraft utilisation, a key metric for profitability. And with much of Russia and Ukraine’s airspace already closed due to the ongoing war, airlines now have fewer alternate corridors available.<h2>Airspace map tightening: A global chokepoint</h2>The West Asia serves as a crucial artery for long-haul traffic connecting Europe, Asia, and Australia. According to Reuters, airports in Dubai and Doha handle nearly 400,000 passengers per day, with Abu Dhabi seeing another 80,000.&nbsp;Since the Israel–Iran conflict began, commercial aircraft have increasingly avoided airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. Aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions reported that around 1,400 daily flights now need rerouting, primarily over Turkey or the Red Sea corridor, increasing traffic congestion and fuel demand.<h2>Airlines issue fresh advisories</h2>Qatar Airways resumed operations Tuesday after the reopening of the country’s airspace. “We’ve deployed extra ground staff at Hamad International Airport to support passengers,” the airline said, urging travellers to check flight status before travel.&nbsp;Emirates Airlines confirmed it rerouted several flights on June 23 but did not cancel operations. It said it is now flying routes “well distanced from conflict areas.”IndiGo Airlines issued a safety update, saying it is “prudently and progressively resuming” West Asia routes, but is actively monitoring the security situation.<h2>Governments issue security advisories</h2>Governments around the world have now issued advisories in light of the worsening security climate.The US State Department issued a “worldwide caution” advisory, warning of “disruptions to travel and potential demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad” due to the Israel–Iran conflict.&nbsp;The UK Foreign Office, as per BBC, urged travellers to “avoid non-essential travel to the Middle East,” particularly to Qatar, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, and parts of Israel.India’s Ministry of External Affairs also issued a travel advisory, requesting Indian citizens to “postpone non-essential travel to the Gulf region” and register with Indian embassies abroad if they’re already in affected areas.<h2>What it means for passengers and airlines?</h2>Passengers should prepare for flight delays, longer travel times, rebookings, and possible cancellations, experts said. According to aviation risk firm International SOS, the situation is fluid and subject to change daily.&nbsp;Stranded passengers at Doha and Dubai reported long waits, limited food access, and high uncertainty about onward travel. As per BBC, several hundred passengers spent Monday night in Hamad Airport lounges, awaiting updates.<h2>What lies ahead?&nbsp;</h2>While some airspace has reopened, the uncertainty remains. “Every mile rerouted is a dollar burned,” aviation analyst John Strickland told BBC. “If this persists, some carriers may suspend Gulf routes altogether.”&nbsp;Airlines are bracing for longer-term turbulence, logistical, financial, and political. For now, the message to travellers is clear: expect disruption. Monitor airline websites. Follow travel advisories. And don’t assume tomorrow’s flight will operate as planned.&nbsp;The missile strike may have lasted minutes, but its aftershocks are set to reverberate through global aviation for weeks. For the Gulf, a strategic flight corridor, the skies remain contested. And for passengers, what was once a smooth layover is now a high-stakes waiting game.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Following Iran missile attack on the US Al Udeid airbase, airlines such as British Airways, Emirates, and Qatar Airways cancelled or rerouted flights, disrupting schedules and inflating operational costs by 10 to15% per flight. '

The escalating military confrontation between Iran and the United States has sent shockwaves through global aviation, grounding key flights across the West Asia and forcing airlines to absorb mounting costs from longer detours, suspended routes, and disrupted schedules. After Iran fired missiles at the US Al Udeid airbase in Qatar on Monday, airlines across Europe, Asia, and the West Asia moved swiftly to cancel or reroute dozens of flights, triggering a ripple effect across global travel. As per Reuters, the missile attack, claimed by Iran as retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear facilities—temporarily closed Qatar’s airspace and disrupted operations at Doha’s Hamad International Airport, a critical global hub. The UAE also paused flights at Dubai International Airport, the world’s busiest international terminal. Over 30 airlines affected as Gulf airspace shuts down According to aviation data firms Cirium and Flightradar24, more than 20 commercial aircraft bound for Doha were diverted mid-air. Another four heading to Dubai turned back. Meanwhile, Bahrain temporarily closed its airspace, adding to the bottleneck. Major carriers including British Airways, Japan Airlines, Finnair, Iberia, Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Air India either suspended or rerouted flights. Air India confirmed on Monday it had halted operations to the West Asia, as well as flights to Europe and the US East Coast, until further notice. Some flights were returned to their origin airports, others diverted, and many were re-routed over alternate corridors. The rising cost of disruption: More fuel, crew and delays For airlines, the cost impact is already visible. Aviation analyst John Strickland, as quoted by BBC, said detours add significant fuel expenses, reduce aircraft availability, and disrupt crew schedules. “Each longer routing increases operational costs sharply. Airlines must account for fuel burn, flight timing limitations, and legal crew rest requirements.” In financial terms, airlines could face cost increases of 10–15 per cent per affected flight, industry insiders told CNBC. Rerouting flights north via Turkey or south over Saudi Arabia adds up to 90 minutes of flying time, reducing daily aircraft utilisation, a key metric for profitability. And with much of Russia and Ukraine’s airspace already closed due to the ongoing war, airlines now have fewer alternate corridors available. Airspace map tightening: A global chokepoint The West Asia serves as a crucial artery for long-haul traffic connecting Europe, Asia, and Australia. According to Reuters, airports in Dubai and Doha handle nearly 400,000 passengers per day, with Abu Dhabi seeing another 80,000. Since the Israel–Iran conflict began, commercial aircraft have increasingly avoided airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. Aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions reported that around 1,400 daily flights now need rerouting, primarily over Turkey or the Red Sea corridor, increasing traffic congestion and fuel demand. Airlines issue fresh advisories Qatar Airways resumed operations Tuesday after the reopening of the country’s airspace. “We’ve deployed extra ground staff at Hamad International Airport to support passengers,” the airline said, urging travellers to check flight status before travel. Emirates Airlines confirmed it rerouted several flights on June 23 but did not cancel operations. It said it is now flying routes “well distanced from conflict areas.” IndiGo Airlines issued a safety update, saying it is “prudently and progressively resuming” West Asia routes, but is actively monitoring the security situation. Governments issue security advisories Governments around the world have now issued advisories in light of the worsening security climate. The US State Department issued a “worldwide caution” advisory, warning of “disruptions to travel and potential demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad” due to the Israel–Iran conflict. The UK Foreign Office, as per BBC, urged travellers to “avoid non-essential travel to the Middle East,” particularly to Qatar, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, and parts of Israel. India’s Ministry of External Affairs also issued a travel advisory, requesting Indian citizens to “postpone non-essential travel to the Gulf region” and register with Indian embassies abroad if they’re already in affected areas. What it means for passengers and airlines? Passengers should prepare for flight delays, longer travel times, rebookings, and possible cancellations, experts said. According to aviation risk firm International SOS, the situation is fluid and subject to change daily. Stranded passengers at Doha and Dubai reported long waits, limited food access, and high uncertainty about onward travel. As per BBC, several hundred passengers spent Monday night in Hamad Airport lounges, awaiting updates. What lies ahead? While some airspace has reopened, the uncertainty remains. “Every mile rerouted is a dollar burned,” aviation analyst John Strickland told BBC. “If this persists, some carriers may suspend Gulf routes altogether.” Airlines are bracing for longer-term turbulence, logistical, financial, and political. For now, the message to travellers is clear: expect disruption. Monitor airline websites. Follow travel advisories. And don’t assume tomorrow’s flight will operate as planned. The missile strike may have lasted minutes, but its aftershocks are set to reverberate through global aviation for weeks. For the Gulf, a strategic flight corridor, the skies remain contested. And for passengers, what was once a smooth layover is now a high-stakes waiting game. (With inputs from the agencies)

The US-Iran military tensions have severely impacted global aviation, leading to the grounding of major flights in the West Asia.

Airlines cancel flights and reroute over escalating West Asia missile tensions

China is ramping up coal exports in response to a domestic supply glut, with outbound shipments rising 13 per cent in the first five months of 2025 compared to a year earlier, Reuters reported. The world’s largest coal producer exported around 2.5 million tonnes during the period, according to customs data, with key buyers including Asian countries like Japan, South Korea, and Indonesia, and even some deliveries reaching as far as the Netherlands. While modest in scale compared to China’s nearly 5 billion tonnes of annual output, the uptick in exports is notable as it comes during a season when domestic demand typically surges.&nbsp;The move underscores China’s growing struggle to balance its local production with consumption, as cooling industrial demand, rising use of renewable energy, and weak prices continue to weigh on the country’s coal market.<h2>Imports fall as domestic stockpiles grow</h2>China’s coal imports, once a major pressure valve for power generators and industry, have dropped sharply. Official data shows that imports fell 8 per cent year-on-year through May, and industry officials expect total imports to decline by as much as 100 million tonnes in 2025, which is equivalent to an 18 per cent annual drop. The country had imported a record 542.7 million tonnes in 2024.The reversal comes as the government mandates to stockpile domestically mined fuel and reduce reliance on international supplies. Domestic coal output is expected to increase by 70-80 million tonnes this year, after a decline in 2024. Meanwhile, prices have slumped to four-year lows, pressuring smaller miners and forcing them to consider output cuts.Indonesia, China’s largest coal supplier, saw shipments fall 26 per cent in May, while Australian exports, favoured for their higher quality, saw a slight increase.<h2>Summer demand may offer temporary relief</h2>With scorching summer temperatures boosting air conditioning use, analysts expect a seasonal uptick in coal consumption in China, which could offer temporary relief to oversupplied markets. Still, longer-term trends point to a gradual decline in coal's dominance.Data from energy think tank Ember shows wind and solar energy accounted for 39 per cent of China’s total power generation in Q1 2025, which is the highest ever for the nation. While coal remains the backbone of the country’s energy system, especially for baseload generation, its share in the energy mix continues to fall, currently hovering just above 50 per cent, down from 80 per cent a decade ago.

China is rising shipments to Asian countries and Europe to deal with its excess supply, marking a shift in global coal dynamics.

China is ramping up coal exports in response to a domestic supply glut, with outbound shipments rising 13 per cent in the first five months of 2025 compared to a year earlier, Reuters reported. The world’s largest coal producer exported around 2.5 million tonnes during the period, according to customs data, with key buyers including Asian countries like Japan, South Korea, and Indonesia, and even some deliveries reaching as far as the Netherlands. While modest in scale compared to China’s nearly 5 billion tonnes of annual output, the uptick in exports is notable as it comes during a season when domestic demand typically surges. The move underscores China’s growing struggle to balance its local production with consumption, as cooling industrial demand, rising use of renewable energy, and weak prices continue to weigh on the country’s coal market. Imports fall as domestic stockpiles grow China’s coal imports, once a major pressure valve for power generators and industry, have dropped sharply. Official data shows that imports fell 8 per cent year-on-year through May, and industry officials expect total imports to decline by as much as 100 million tonnes in 2025, which is equivalent to an 18 per cent annual drop. The country had imported a record 542.7 million tonnes in 2024. The reversal comes as the government mandates to stockpile domestically mined fuel and reduce reliance on international supplies. Domestic coal output is expected to increase by 70-80 million tonnes this year, after a decline in 2024. Meanwhile, prices have slumped to four-year lows, pressuring smaller miners and forcing them to consider output cuts. Indonesia, China’s largest coal supplier, saw shipments fall 26 per cent in May, while Australian exports, favoured for their higher quality, saw a slight increase. Summer demand may offer temporary relief With scorching summer temperatures boosting air conditioning use, analysts expect a seasonal uptick in coal consumption in China, which could offer temporary relief to oversupplied markets. Still, longer-term trends point to a gradual decline in coal's dominance. Data from energy think tank Ember shows wind and solar energy accounted for 39 per cent of China’s total power generation in Q1 2025, which is the highest ever for the nation. While coal remains the backbone of the country’s energy system, especially for baseload generation, its share in the energy mix continues to fall, currently hovering just above 50 per cent, down from 80 per cent a decade ago.

China is rising shipments to Asian countries and Europe to deal with its excess supply, marking a shift in global coal dynamics.

China boosts coal exports amid domestic glut, shrinking imports

US business activity continued to expand in June, although the pace of growth slowed, as tariffs and geopolitical tensions fuelled inflation and cast uncertainty over future growth. The latest flash data from S&amp;P Global shows the Composite PMI Output Index slipped slightly to 52.8 from 53.0 in May (a reading above 50 indicated expansion and a reading below 50 shows contraction), still signalling growth but at a pace well below levels seen in late 2024. While output has now risen for 29 consecutive months, the June data highlights intensifying headwinds from rising input costs, shrinking exports, and geopolitical instability, especially following the recent escalation in West Asia.<h2>Tariffs drive prices higher across sectors</h2>The clearest concern emerging from the June report was the increase in inflationary pressures, driven heavily by tariff-induced price hikes. Nearly two-thirds of manufacturers citing rising input costs blamed tariffs, while over half linked higher selling prices to tariffs. The prices paid index for manufacturers surged to 70, the highest since July 2022, as companies dealt with increased import duties and passed the burden onto consumers. Price increases were also seen in the services sector, with firms reporting elevated costs due to tariffs, rising wages, fuel, and financing costs.While competition in services helped moderate price growth somewhat compared to May, the overall inflation rate for goods and services was the second-highest since early 2023. S&amp;P Global warned that the current price trajectory could see consumer inflation rise toward 4 per cent in the coming months.<h2>Mixed signals on growth: Manufacturing up, exports down</h2>A positive aspect of June’s data was the more balanced growth between manufacturing and services. Manufacturing output rose for the first time since February, even as service sector growth cooled modestly. However, the rise in domestic demand masked a worrying trend—a continued decline in exports. Service providers reported the sharpest quarterly drop in exports since late 2022, and manufacturers also saw a fall in overseas orders. Analysts noted that the decrease reflected the global trade disruption caused by tariff uncertainty and geopolitical tensions.Adding to short-term momentum was a sharp build-up in inventories, with firms increasing purchases at the fastest rate in over three years. But S&amp;P Global’s Chris Williamson warned that stockpiling, driven by fears of future price hikes and supply disruptions, is “likely to unwind in the coming months”.<h2>Labour market shows resilience, but sentiment wanes</h2>Despite economic uncertainties, businesses responded to rising workloads and backlogs by boosting hiring at the fastest pace in over a year. Manufacturing led the gains, with job creation reaching a 12-month high, while services hiring also strengthened.Yet, business confidence dipped in June, especially among service providers, amid concerns over Trump-era policies like government spending cuts and trade protectionism. Manufacturers were marginally more upbeat, hoping to benefit from protectionist measures, but overall sentiment remains well below pre-2025 levels.<h2>Fed expected to hold rates amid uncertain outlook</h2>With inflation accelerating and demand moderating, the Federal Reserve is expected to pause further interest rate cuts. The central bank has held rates steady at 4.25-4.50 per cent since December 2024 after 100 basis points (bps) of cuts last year.S&amp;P Global’s data suggests stagflation risks are rising, as tariff-driven cost pressures and a slowing housing market threaten consumer spending. Despite a slight rise in May’s home sales, the pace was the weakest for that month since 2009, with high mortgage rates discouraging buyers.Economists now expect the US economy to grow by under 1.5 per cent in 2025, the slowest pace since the global financial crisis, excluding the pandemic year of 2020.While markets await clarity on US trade and foreign policy, the Fed is likely to stick with a “wait and see” approach to assess how durable current inflation and growth trends are before taking further action.

Manufacturing in the United States sees modest expansion this month; inflation pressures intensify as backlog builds.

US business activity continued to expand in June, although the pace of growth slowed, as tariffs and geopolitical tensions fuelled inflation and cast uncertainty over future growth. The latest flash data from S&P Global shows the Composite PMI Output Index slipped slightly to 52.8 from 53.0 in May (a reading above 50 indicated expansion and a reading below 50 shows contraction), still signalling growth but at a pace well below levels seen in late 2024. While output has now risen for 29 consecutive months, the June data highlights intensifying headwinds from rising input costs, shrinking exports, and geopolitical instability, especially following the recent escalation in West Asia. Tariffs drive prices higher across sectors The clearest concern emerging from the June report was the increase in inflationary pressures, driven heavily by tariff-induced price hikes. Nearly two-thirds of manufacturers citing rising input costs blamed tariffs, while over half linked higher selling prices to tariffs. The prices paid index for manufacturers surged to 70, the highest since July 2022, as companies dealt with increased import duties and passed the burden onto consumers. Price increases were also seen in the services sector, with firms reporting elevated costs due to tariffs, rising wages, fuel, and financing costs. While competition in services helped moderate price growth somewhat compared to May, the overall inflation rate for goods and services was the second-highest since early 2023. S&P Global warned that the current price trajectory could see consumer inflation rise toward 4 per cent in the coming months. Mixed signals on growth: Manufacturing up, exports down A positive aspect of June’s data was the more balanced growth between manufacturing and services. Manufacturing output rose for the first time since February, even as service sector growth cooled modestly. However, the rise in domestic demand masked a worrying trend—a continued decline in exports. Service providers reported the sharpest quarterly drop in exports since late 2022, and manufacturers also saw a fall in overseas orders. Analysts noted that the decrease reflected the global trade disruption caused by tariff uncertainty and geopolitical tensions. Adding to short-term momentum was a sharp build-up in inventories, with firms increasing purchases at the fastest rate in over three years. But S&P Global’s Chris Williamson warned that stockpiling, driven by fears of future price hikes and supply disruptions, is “likely to unwind in the coming months”. Labour market shows resilience, but sentiment wanes Despite economic uncertainties, businesses responded to rising workloads and backlogs by boosting hiring at the fastest pace in over a year. Manufacturing led the gains, with job creation reaching a 12-month high, while services hiring also strengthened. Yet, business confidence dipped in June, especially among service providers, amid concerns over Trump-era policies like government spending cuts and trade protectionism. Manufacturers were marginally more upbeat, hoping to benefit from protectionist measures, but overall sentiment remains well below pre-2025 levels. Fed expected to hold rates amid uncertain outlook With inflation accelerating and demand moderating, the Federal Reserve is expected to pause further interest rate cuts. The central bank has held rates steady at 4.25-4.50 per cent since December 2024 after 100 basis points (bps) of cuts last year. S&P Global’s data suggests stagflation risks are rising, as tariff-driven cost pressures and a slowing housing market threaten consumer spending. Despite a slight rise in May’s home sales, the pace was the weakest for that month since 2009, with high mortgage rates discouraging buyers. Economists now expect the US economy to grow by under 1.5 per cent in 2025, the slowest pace since the global financial crisis, excluding the pandemic year of 2020. While markets await clarity on US trade and foreign policy, the Fed is likely to stick with a “wait and see” approach to assess how durable current inflation and growth trends are before taking further action.

Manufacturing in the United States sees modest expansion this month; inflation pressures intensify as backlog builds.

US business activity grows in June, but tariffs and inflation cloud outlook

The US dollar weakened on Tuesday as global markets staged a risk rally following US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, easing fears of a broader West Asia conflict.&nbsp;As per Reuters, the risk-sensitive Australian and New Zealand dollars climbed after the news, with the Australian dollar rising 0.35 per cent to $0.6483 and the New Zealand dollar up 0.37 per cent to $0.5998. The dollar, which had benefited from safe-haven flows during the 12-day conflict, fell broadly after Trump said a “complete and total” ceasefire would go into effect. The announcement came just hours after both Iran and Israel had escalated threats of new attacks.<h2>West Asia de-escalation lifts risk sentiment</h2>On Monday, US President Donald Trump said that a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran will go into force with a view to ending the conflict between the two nations.&nbsp;"On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12-DAY WAR'," Trump wrote on his Truth Social site.

The greenback fell 0.21 per cent to 145.79 against the Japanese yen. The euro edged up 0.21 per cent to $1.1602, while the British pound climbed 0.18 per cent to $1.3551.&nbsp;Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank, told Reuters, “It’s obviously positive news for risk sentiment. We need to have a bit more detail in terms of exactly what all this means and the conditions for a more long-lasting peace.”&nbsp;The ceasefire news followed an Iranian missile attack on a US air base in Qatar, which reportedly caused no casualties. Trump dismissed the strike as a “weak response” to earlier US attacks on Iranian nuclear infrastructure.<h2>Fed rate cut expectations add pressure on dollar</h2>As per Reuters, the dollar also faced additional headwinds from dovish comments by Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman, who suggested the US central bank should consider cutting interest rates soon. Her comments were echoed by Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who recently indicated support for a rate cut at the Fed’s upcoming meeting in July.&nbsp;Tony Sycamore, a market analyst at IG, said there was growing divergence among Fed officials, adding, “The chance of a July rate cut is still underpriced. I think it should be higher than that.” According to CME’s FedWatch tool, the probability of a July rate cut rose to 20 per cent on Tuesday, up from 14.5 per cent a day earlier.&nbsp;All eyes are now on US Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who is scheduled to testify before Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday. Markets will closely watch his remarks for clues on the future path of US monetary policy.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Analysts noted that peace prospects enhanced risk sentiment, although Fed rate cut expectations added pressure on the dollar. 

The US dollar weakened on Tuesday as global markets staged a risk rally following US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, easing fears of a broader West Asia conflict. As per Reuters, the risk-sensitive Australian and New Zealand dollars climbed after the news, with the Australian dollar rising 0.35 per cent to $0.6483 and the New Zealand dollar up 0.37 per cent to $0.5998. The dollar, which had benefited from safe-haven flows during the 12-day conflict, fell broadly after Trump said a “complete and total” ceasefire would go into effect. The announcement came just hours after both Iran and Israel had escalated threats of new attacks. West Asia de-escalation lifts risk sentiment On Monday, US President Donald Trump said that a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran will go into force with a view to ending the conflict between the two nations. "On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12-DAY WAR'," Trump wrote on his Truth Social site.

The US dollar weakened as global markets rallied following Trump's announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, easing West Asia conflict fears.

Dollar dips as Trump-brokered Israel–Iran ceasefire triggers global risk rally

Oil prices plunged to over one-week lows on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump declared that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire, easing fears of prolonged conflict and potential disruptions to oil supplies in the West Asia. As per Reuters, Brent crude futures dropped $2.69, or 3.76 per cent, to $68.79 a barrel as of 0006 GMT. Earlier in the session, prices fell more than 4 per cent to their lowest since June 11.&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude fell $2.70, or 3.94 per cent, to $65.46 per barrel—its weakest since June 9—after sliding nearly 6 per cent earlier in the day.<h2>Trump confirms ceasefire timeline</h2>President Trump announced on Monday that both sides had reached a “complete and total” ceasefire. As quoted by Reuters, Iran is to begin the ceasefire immediately, with Israel following after 12 hours. If peace holds, the war, now 12 days old, will officially end within 24 hours.&nbsp;The truce comes days after the US carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a move that had pushed oil prices to five-month highs and triggered fears of broader regional escalation.<h2>Oil market sheds war premium</h2>Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, told Reuters, “The risk premium built into crude oil last week has all but evaporated.” Traders appear to be unwinding positions that had been built up on the expectation of wider conflict and potential supply shocks.&nbsp;Iran is OPEC’s third-largest crude oil producer, and an easing of hostilities is expected to facilitate the resumption of its oil exports. This is a key factor behind the pullback in oil prices, which had surged in recent sessions on fears of supply disruptions.<h2>Resistance levels cap recovery</h2>Despite the decline, analysts say oil prices may still face strong technical resistance. Sycamore added that the recent sell-off reinforces a price ceiling between $78.40, marking the highs of October 2024 and June 2025 and $80.77, the current year-to-date high.&nbsp;According to Reuters, both Brent and WTI benchmarks had rallied more than 7 per cent in the previous session before reversing gains following Trump’s ceasefire announcement. As markets digest the truce, attention now turns to its implementation and durability. A stable ceasefire could allow Iranian oil to flow more freely, bringing relief to importers and potentially easing inflationary pressures globally.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Analysts noted that the war risk premium has largely dissipated, but technical resistance may limit further recovery as markets assess the ceasefire sustainability.

Oil prices plunged to over one-week lows on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump declared that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire, easing fears of prolonged conflict and potential disruptions to oil supplies in the West Asia. As per Reuters, Brent crude futures dropped $2.69, or 3.76 per cent, to $68.79 a barrel as of 0006 GMT. Earlier in the session, prices fell more than 4 per cent to their lowest since June 11. Meanwhile, US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude fell $2.70, or 3.94 per cent, to $65.46 per barrel—its weakest since June 9—after sliding nearly 6 per cent earlier in the day. Trump confirms ceasefire timeline President Trump announced on Monday that both sides had reached a “complete and total” ceasefire. As quoted by Reuters, Iran is to begin the ceasefire immediately, with Israel following after 12 hours. If peace holds, the war, now 12 days old, will officially end within 24 hours. The truce comes days after the US carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a move that had pushed oil prices to five-month highs and triggered fears of broader regional escalation. Oil market sheds war premium Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, told Reuters, “The risk premium built into crude oil last week has all but evaporated.” Traders appear to be unwinding positions that had been built up on the expectation of wider conflict and potential supply shocks. Iran is OPEC’s third-largest crude oil producer, and an easing of hostilities is expected to facilitate the resumption of its oil exports. This is a key factor behind the pullback in oil prices, which had surged in recent sessions on fears of supply disruptions. Resistance levels cap recovery Despite the decline, analysts say oil prices may still face strong technical resistance. Sycamore added that the recent sell-off reinforces a price ceiling between $78.40, marking the highs of October 2024 and June 2025 and $80.77, the current year-to-date high. According to Reuters, both Brent and WTI benchmarks had rallied more than 7 per cent in the previous session before reversing gains following Trump’s ceasefire announcement. As markets digest the truce, attention now turns to its implementation and durability. A stable ceasefire could allow Iranian oil to flow more freely, bringing relief to importers and potentially easing inflationary pressures globally. (With inputs from the agencies)

Oil prices fell to over one-week lows after President Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, easing conflict fears. Brent crude declined by 3.76% to $68.79 and WTI fell 3.94% to $65.46.

Oil prices drop to one-week low as Trump announces Israel–Iran ceasefire

Amid fears of Iran closing down the Strait of Hormuz and severely impacting oil supplies, US President Donald Trump issued a warning to global oil producers and urged them to resist any move that could increase costs. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important oil routes in the world, and about one-fifth of the global oil supply passes through it daily. “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING! YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday morning in all caps and using exclamation marks, as he mostly does.&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;Trump also issued an appeal to increase America’s domestic oil and gas supply, “To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!”&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;The Iranian lawmakers had threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key commercial shipping channel for the world’s oil supply, in retaliation for the US strikes.&nbsp;&nbsp;Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers that may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.It would also negatively impact his efforts to boost the US economy by increasing business costs that would in turn deter investment and job growth.&nbsp;&nbsp;So far, oil prices have been subdued after jumping 4 per cent after trading began on Sunday night but pared back soon.On Monday morning, the price of a barrel of US oil was marginally up by 0.4 per cent at $74.16 after briefly dipping, while Brent crude, the international standard, edged up by 0.2 per cent to $77.17 per barrel. Both are still higher than before strikes began on Iran over a week ago.&nbsp;The subdued market reaction shows investors believe Iran is unlikely to block the Strait of Hormuz, as it is itself a major oil producer and would suffer from a closure. Analysts also suspect if Iran would close the waterway, since it itself uses it to move its own crude, mostly to China, and needs the revenue.&nbsp;US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday that any attempt by Iran to block the strait would be “economic suicide” and would draw a response from Washington.

Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers, which may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.

Amid fears of Iran closing down the Strait of Hormuz and severely impacting oil supplies, US President Donald Trump issued a warning to global oil producers and urged them to resist any move that could increase costs. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important oil routes in the world, and about one-fifth of the global oil supply passes through it daily. “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING! YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday morning in all caps and using exclamation marks, as he mostly does.

Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers, which may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.

‘Keep oil prices down. I’m watching’: Trump issues warning after Iran strikes

Indian equity markets opened the week on a weak note, with the benchmark indices declining amid rising geopolitical tensions in West Asia and continued pressure on IT stocks. The BSE Sensex closed 511.38 points, or 0.62 per cent, lower at 81,896.79, while the Nifty 50 lost 140.50 points, or 0.56 per cent, to settle at 24,971.90, slipping below the key 25,000 mark. While the headline indices declined, broader markets showed resilience, with the BSE Midcap index gaining 0.2 per cent and the Smallcap index rising 0.6 per cent. The Nifty Midcap and Smallcap indices outperformed for the second straight session, supported by selective buying in capital goods and defence stocks.&nbsp;The early weakness came after the US launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, escalating tensions in West Asia and briefly pushing Brent crude prices to a five-month high of $81.40 per barrel, before retreating to $78.93 per barrel. The market mood remained cautious as investors monitored potential retaliatory actions from Iran, particularly fears around disruptions to crude supplies via the strategic Strait of Hormuz.<h2>IT and auto drag, defence and metal stocks gain</h2>Sectorally, IT stocks led the decline, with the Nifty IT index dropping over 1.48 per cent, following Accenture’s weak Q3 results and a third straight quarter of year-on-year decline in outsourcing contracts. Major Indian IT firms like Infosys, HCL Tech, and TCS ended lower by 1-2.5 per cent, as concerns grew around sustained softness in global tech spending, particularly from the US.&nbsp;Auto and FMCG stocks also witnessed profit booking. The auto index fell amid investor reaction to the government’s proposal for mandatory ABS for all new two-wheelers, which could raise costs. Bajaj Auto dropped around 1 per cent, while Hero MotoCorp and Mahindra &amp; Mahindra also ended in the red.&nbsp;On the positive side, metal and capital goods stocks rebounded during the day, supported by easing oil prices and renewed interest in manufacturing-linked sectors. Hindalco Industries, Bharat Electronics, and Adani Enterprises were among the top gainers. Defence stocks rallied on order wins and safe-haven demand, with Garden Reach Shipbuilders rising 6 per cent.<h2>Rupee weakens; oil prices, RBI action in focus</h2>The Indian rupee fell 16 paise to close at 86.75 per US dollar (provisional), pressured by risk aversion and a flight to safe-haven assets like the US dollar. The dollar index climbed nearly 0.4 per cent, while most Asian currencies slipped between 0.2 per cent and 1.4 per cent. Traders said further escalation in West Asia could push the rupee below the psychological 87 level, though intervention from the Reserve Bank of India is likely if volatility spikes.&nbsp;Looking ahead, with limited domestic triggers, global market cues and crude price trends will be key in setting near-term market direction. Analysts suggest focusing on selective stock-picking amid the ongoing consolidation, especially in sectors showing relative strength.

The market mood remained cautious as investors monitored potential retaliatory actions from Iran, particularly fears around disruptions to crude supplies via the strategic Strait of Hormuz

Indian equity markets opened the week on a weak note, with the benchmark indices declining amid rising geopolitical tensions in West Asia and continued pressure on IT stocks. The BSE Sensex closed 511.38 points, or 0.62 per cent, lower at 81,896.79, while the Nifty 50 lost 140.50 points, or 0.56 per cent, to settle at 24,971.90, slipping below the key 25,000 mark. While the headline indices declined, broader markets showed resilience, with the BSE Midcap index gaining 0.2 per cent and the Smallcap index rising 0.6 per cent. The Nifty Midcap and Smallcap indices outperformed for the second straight session, supported by selective buying in capital goods and defence stocks. The early weakness came after the US launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, escalating tensions in West Asia and briefly pushing Brent crude prices to a five-month high of $81.40 per barrel, before retreating to $78.93 per barrel. The market mood remained cautious as investors monitored potential retaliatory actions from Iran, particularly fears around disruptions to crude supplies via the strategic Strait of Hormuz. IT and auto drag, defence and metal stocks gain Sectorally, IT stocks led the decline, with the Nifty IT index dropping over 1.48 per cent, following Accenture’s weak Q3 results and a third straight quarter of year-on-year decline in outsourcing contracts. Major Indian IT firms like Infosys, HCL Tech, and TCS ended lower by 1-2.5 per cent, as concerns grew around sustained softness in global tech spending, particularly from the US. Auto and FMCG stocks also witnessed profit booking. The auto index fell amid investor reaction to the government’s proposal for mandatory ABS for all new two-wheelers, which could raise costs. Bajaj Auto dropped around 1 per cent, while Hero MotoCorp and Mahindra & Mahindra also ended in the red. On the positive side, metal and capital goods stocks rebounded during the day, supported by easing oil prices and renewed interest in manufacturing-linked sectors. Hindalco Industries, Bharat Electronics, and Adani Enterprises were among the top gainers. Defence stocks rallied on order wins and safe-haven demand, with Garden Reach Shipbuilders rising 6 per cent. Rupee weakens; oil prices, RBI action in focus The Indian rupee fell 16 paise to close at 86.75 per US dollar (provisional), pressured by risk aversion and a flight to safe-haven assets like the US dollar. The dollar index climbed nearly 0.4 per cent, while most Asian currencies slipped between 0.2 per cent and 1.4 per cent. Traders said further escalation in West Asia could push the rupee below the psychological 87 level, though intervention from the Reserve Bank of India is likely if volatility spikes. Looking ahead, with limited domestic triggers, global market cues and crude price trends will be key in setting near-term market direction. Analysts suggest focusing on selective stock-picking amid the ongoing consolidation, especially in sectors showing relative strength.

The market mood remained cautious as investors monitored potential retaliatory actions from Iran, particularly fears around disruptions to crude supplies via the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

Indian equities slip as geopolitical tensions and weak IT sector weigh on sentiment

The Strait of Hormuz—a narrow, 33-km-wide maritime chokepoint between Iran and Oman—is once again at the centre of global attention, this time more perilously than ever before. Amid intensifying military conflict in West Asia, Iran’s Parliament has reportedly approved a plan to block the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation of the US’ airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. While the final decision rests with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, even the suggestion of a closure has already roiled global oil markets and raised alarm across nations that depend on oil imports for their energy needs.The Strait is one of the world’s most critical energy arteries, through which nearly 20 per cent of the world’s oil and LNG (liquified natural gas) flows daily, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). In 2024 alone, about 17 million barrels of oil and 25 per cent of global LNG passed through this route. A blockade—even if temporary—could disrupt more than $2 trillion worth of trade, spike oil prices beyond $120 per barrel, and unleash inflationary shocks across continents.<h2>India faces the heat of the conflict</h2>India, which relies heavily on crude and gas imports to power its economy, is particularly vulnerable. According to ICRA, 45–50 per cent of India’s crude oil imports pass through the Strait, sourced primarily from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE. Additionally, India’s LNG imports, especially from Qatar, are routed through Hormuz, making the potential closure an energy security nightmare.Oil prices have already surged in anticipation. Brent crude rose 2 per cent to hover near $80 per barrel, while analysts warn that a prolonged disruption could push it well past $100–120 per barrel.The economic fallout for India would be immediate. ICRA estimates that every $10/barrel increase in oil prices would inflate India’s oil import bill by $13-14 billion annually, while widening the current account deficit (CAD) by 0.3 per cent of GDP. If crude averages $80–90/barrel in FY26, CAD may expand to 1.5–1.6 per cent of GDP, up from 1.2–1.3 per cent, triggering pressure on the Indian rupee and worsening inflation.A 10 per cent surge in oil prices would also raise WPI inflation by 80-100 bps and CPI inflation by 20-30 bps, straining household budgets and increasing the cost of living.Industries highly dependent on petroleum inputs, like tyres, paints, and fertilisers, would see margin pressures. Oil marketing companies (HPCL, BPCL, IOC) may struggle to pass on higher input costs, while upstream firms like ONGC and Oil India could benefit from elevated crude prices.<h2>China’s dilemma: Energy strategy under pressure</h2>China, the world’s largest crude importer, is also staring at major disruption. Roughly 14 per cent of China’s crude oil imports come from Iran, with additional volumes routed indirectly through Malaysia and the UAE to circumvent sanctions. China’s independent refiners rely heavily on discounted Iranian crude and fuel oil, while its vast plastics and petrochemical sectors depend on Iranian LPG, which makes up nearly 25 per cent of its LPG (liquified petroleum gas) imports.A closure of Hormuz or a partial halt in Iranian exports would leave China scrambling to secure alternative supplies. Demand has already surged for Indian Ocean-side crudes like Abu Dhabi’s Murban and Russian ESPO. Any further disruption could force China to compete more aggressively in the spot market, pushing global prices even higher.<h2>Asia’s energy axis: Japan, South Korea, and the rest</h2>Beyond India and China, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia also remain deeply exposed. Collectively, Asia consumes over 80 per cent of the oil and gas transiting Hormuz. Japan and South Korea, in particular, rely on Gulf oil for their refineries and LNG for their power plants. A closure could trigger energy shortages, increase power tariffs, and exacerbate inflation across the region.For smaller Asian economies still recovering from the pandemic and supply chain shocks, this could prove destabilising. LNG-based power producers and city gas distribution (CGD) firms, like Adani Total Gas, Mahanagar Gas, and Indraprastha Gas, could see margins shrink as imported fuel becomes prohibitively expensive.<h2>Global repercussions: From Europe to Wall Street</h2>The impact won’t stop in Asia. Europe, still reeling from the fallout of the Ukraine war, depends on Qatari LNG routed through Hormuz. A disruption could intensify energy shortages and derail recovery.The global shipping and insurance industries would also feel the pinch. Tankers, already paying higher war-risk premiums, may be rerouted through longer, more expensive paths like around South Africa, delaying deliveries and increasing freight rates.Market volatility is inevitable. Stock indices have already begun to reflect war jitters, and a sustained oil rally could force central banks to revise inflation outlooks, pause rate cuts, or even raise rates again.<h2>Iran’s strategic gamble: A double-edged sword</h2>While Iran's threat to close the Strait may be driven by strategic calculations, it risks severe self-inflicted damage. Over 90 per cent of Iran’s own crude and LNG exports pass through Hormuz. Any closure would undercut Tehran’s discounted oil sales to China, one of its few remaining financial lifelines amid sanctions.Moreover, closure would alienate allies like China and Russia, who rely on uninterrupted flows. It could also provoke a military response from the US, UK, or France, all of which maintain naval forces in the region. Historically, even during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, the Strait was never fully blocked, underlining the severity of such a move.<h2>Outlook remains fragile, volatile, and contingent on diplomacy</h2>As of now, Iran has not formally enacted a closure, but tensions remain sky-high. The international community, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has called on China to pressure Iran into restraint, warning of “economic suicide” if the Strait is blocked.Short-term oil volatility is almost certain, with prices reacting sharply to geopolitical signals. Strategic oil reserves may offer temporary cushioning, but a prolonged crisis would require diplomatic interventions, alternate logistics planning, and possibly new trade partnerships.

For India and much of Asia, the coming weeks will be crucial. As the world's energy lifeline teeters on the brink, every diplomatic move, military engagement, and shipping update will reverberate across economies, markets, and households.

The Strait of Hormuz—a narrow, 33-km-wide maritime chokepoint between Iran and Oman—is once again at the centre of global attention, this time more perilously than ever before. Amid intensifying military conflict in West Asia, Iran’s Parliament has reportedly approved a plan to block the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation of the US’ airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. While the final decision rests with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, even the suggestion of a closure has already roiled global oil markets and raised alarm across nations that depend on oil imports for their energy needs. The Strait is one of the world’s most critical energy arteries, through which nearly 20 per cent of the world’s oil and LNG (liquified natural gas) flows daily, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). In 2024 alone, about 17 million barrels of oil and 25 per cent of global LNG passed through this route. A blockade—even if temporary—could disrupt more than $2 trillion worth of trade, spike oil prices beyond $120 per barrel, and unleash inflationary shocks across continents. India faces the heat of the conflict India, which relies heavily on crude and gas imports to power its economy, is particularly vulnerable. According to ICRA, 45–50 per cent of India’s crude oil imports pass through the Strait, sourced primarily from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE. Additionally, India’s LNG imports, especially from Qatar, are routed through Hormuz, making the potential closure an energy security nightmare. Oil prices have already surged in anticipation. Brent crude rose 2 per cent to hover near $80 per barrel, while analysts warn that a prolonged disruption could push it well past $100–120 per barrel. The economic fallout for India would be immediate. ICRA estimates that every $10/barrel increase in oil prices would inflate India’s oil import bill by $13-14 billion annually, while widening the current account deficit (CAD) by 0.3 per cent of GDP. If crude averages $80–90/barrel in FY26, CAD may expand to 1.5–1.6 per cent of GDP, up from 1.2–1.3 per cent, triggering pressure on the Indian rupee and worsening inflation. A 10 per cent surge in oil prices would also raise WPI inflation by 80-100 bps and CPI inflation by 20-30 bps, straining household budgets and increasing the cost of living. Industries highly dependent on petroleum inputs, like tyres, paints, and fertilisers, would see margin pressures. Oil marketing companies (HPCL, BPCL, IOC) may struggle to pass on higher input costs, while upstream firms like ONGC and Oil India could benefit from elevated crude prices. China’s dilemma: Energy strategy under pressure China, the world’s largest crude importer, is also staring at major disruption. Roughly 14 per cent of China’s crude oil imports come from Iran, with additional volumes routed indirectly through Malaysia and the UAE to circumvent sanctions. China’s independent refiners rely heavily on discounted Iranian crude and fuel oil, while its vast plastics and petrochemical sectors depend on Iranian LPG, which makes up nearly 25 per cent of its LPG (liquified petroleum gas) imports. A closure of Hormuz or a partial halt in Iranian exports would leave China scrambling to secure alternative supplies. Demand has already surged for Indian Ocean-side crudes like Abu Dhabi’s Murban and Russian ESPO. Any further disruption could force China to compete more aggressively in the spot market, pushing global prices even higher. Asia’s energy axis: Japan, South Korea, and the rest Beyond India and China, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia also remain deeply exposed. Collectively, Asia consumes over 80 per cent of the oil and gas transiting Hormuz. Japan and South Korea, in particular, rely on Gulf oil for their refineries and LNG for their power plants. A closure could trigger energy shortages, increase power tariffs, and exacerbate inflation across the region. For smaller Asian economies still recovering from the pandemic and supply chain shocks, this could prove destabilising. LNG-based power producers and city gas distribution (CGD) firms, like Adani Total Gas, Mahanagar Gas, and Indraprastha Gas, could see margins shrink as imported fuel becomes prohibitively expensive. Global repercussions: From Europe to Wall Street The impact won’t stop in Asia. Europe, still reeling from the fallout of the Ukraine war, depends on Qatari LNG routed through Hormuz. A disruption could intensify energy shortages and derail recovery. The global shipping and insurance industries would also feel the pinch. Tankers, already paying higher war-risk premiums, may be rerouted through longer, more expensive paths like around South Africa, delaying deliveries and increasing freight rates. Market volatility is inevitable. Stock indices have already begun to reflect war jitters, and a sustained oil rally could force central banks to revise inflation outlooks, pause rate cuts, or even raise rates again. Iran’s strategic gamble: A double-edged sword While Iran's threat to close the Strait may be driven by strategic calculations, it risks severe self-inflicted damage. Over 90 per cent of Iran’s own crude and LNG exports pass through Hormuz. Any closure would undercut Tehran’s discounted oil sales to China, one of its few remaining financial lifelines amid sanctions. Moreover, closure would alienate allies like China and Russia, who rely on uninterrupted flows. It could also provoke a military response from the US, UK, or France, all of which maintain naval forces in the region. Historically, even during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, the Strait was never fully blocked, underlining the severity of such a move. Outlook remains fragile, volatile, and contingent on diplomacy As of now, Iran has not formally enacted a closure, but tensions remain sky-high. The international community, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has called on China to pressure Iran into restraint, warning of “economic suicide” if the Strait is blocked. Short-term oil volatility is almost certain, with prices reacting sharply to geopolitical signals. Strategic oil reserves may offer temporary cushioning, but a prolonged crisis would require diplomatic interventions, alternate logistics planning, and possibly new trade partnerships.

For India and much of Asia, the coming weeks will be crucial. As the world's energy lifeline teeters on the brink, every diplomatic move, military engagement, and shipping update will reverberate across economies, markets, and households.

Strait of Hormuz risks: Asia, including India and China, braces for economic jitters

In a landmark move to revive British industry and boost long-term economic growth, the government of the United Kingdom has announced a bold new 10-year industrial strategy aimed at cutting energy costs for businesses, unlocking billions in investment, and creating over 1.1 million well-paid jobs by 2035. The strategy, launched on June 23, focuses on eight key sectors ranging from advanced manufacturing and clean energy to digital technologies and financial services where the UK has a global competitive advantage. It pledges to remove barriers to business expansion, accelerate innovation, and support a cleaner, more resilient economy.<h2>Major electricity cost cuts for manufacturing firms</h2>At the heart of the government’s recent plan is a pledge to slash electricity bills by up to 25 per cent for over 7,000 energy-intensive manufacturers from 2027 through a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme. Eligible businesses, including those in the automotive, aerospace, chemicals and ceramics sectors, will be exempt from green levies such as the Renewables Obligation and Capacity Market charges, saving up to £40 ($53.5) per megawatt-hour.Additionally, support will be expanded under the ‘British Industry Supercharger’ for around 500 of the country’s most energy-intensive companies in steel, glass, and chemicals. These companies will see network charge discounts increase from 60 per cent to 90 per cent by 2026, helping protect jobs and enhance global competitiveness without raising household bills or taxes.Business groups have long cited the extremely high electricity prices as a major obstacle for UK manufacturers, who currently pay some of the highest energy rates in the developed world. The announcement is being seen as a turning point in helping British firms compete with the fast-growing international industry.<h2>Fast-tracking grid access and job creation</h2>The strategy also tackles long delays in connecting new projects to the energy grid, with a ‘Connections Accelerator Service’ set to begin by the end of 2025. This will prioritise investment-heavy and job-creating projects, cutting wait times for grid access.Prime Minister Keir Starmer hailed the strategy as a “turning point for Britain’s economy”, offering long-term direction and certainty. “This is how we power Britain’s future, by backing sectors where we lead, removing the barriers that hold us back, and building a stronger economy that works for working people,” he said.Chancellor Rachel Reeves echoed that sentiment, calling it “a giant step forward” for business and innovation. She announced increased funding for the British Business Bank, boosting its capacity to £25.6 billion ($34.26 billion) to support SMEs and high-growth industries.<h2>Boosting skills, R&amp;D and innovation</h2>To address labour shortages, the government will inject £1.2 billion ($1.6 billion) annually by 2028–29 into skills development, including short courses for high-growth sectors like defence engineering and artificial intelligence (AI). Visa reforms will also be introduced to attract elite global talent.In addition, research and development spending will rise to £22.6 billion ($30.2 billion) annually by the end of the decade, with specific investments in artificial intelligence ($2.67 billion) and advanced manufacturing ($3.74 billion). Regulatory reforms will further clear the way for technologies like biotechnology, autonomous or self-driving vehicles, and clean energy.Industry leaders have welcomed the initiative. Make UK CEO Stephen Phipson called it a “much-needed step” that addresses the sector’s three major challenges: skills shortages, high energy costs, and limited capital access. The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) described it as a “bedrock for growth”.Critics, however, questioned the Labour Party’s ability to sustain the plan. Opposition parties said the strategy admits the high cost of achieving net zero and warned that reforms must avoid burdening taxpayers or leaving small businesses behind. But supporters, including the Trades Union Congress, said lower industrial electricity prices are long overdue.With economic growth faltering—GDP shrank by 0.1 per cent in May—the new strategy represents a significant effort by the UK government to steer the country towards a more competitive, clean, and job-rich future.

UK government plans to cut electricity costs for more than 7,000 firms and create over 1 million skilled jobs under it's 10-year industrial strategy.

In a landmark move to revive British industry and boost long-term economic growth, the government of the United Kingdom has announced a bold new 10-year industrial strategy aimed at cutting energy costs for businesses, unlocking billions in investment, and creating over 1.1 million well-paid jobs by 2035. The strategy, launched on June 23, focuses on eight key sectors ranging from advanced manufacturing and clean energy to digital technologies and financial services where the UK has a global competitive advantage. It pledges to remove barriers to business expansion, accelerate innovation, and support a cleaner, more resilient economy. Major electricity cost cuts for manufacturing firms At the heart of the government’s recent plan is a pledge to slash electricity bills by up to 25 per cent for over 7,000 energy-intensive manufacturers from 2027 through a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme. Eligible businesses, including those in the automotive, aerospace, chemicals and ceramics sectors, will be exempt from green levies such as the Renewables Obligation and Capacity Market charges, saving up to £40 ($53.5) per megawatt-hour. Additionally, support will be expanded under the ‘British Industry Supercharger’ for around 500 of the country’s most energy-intensive companies in steel, glass, and chemicals. These companies will see network charge discounts increase from 60 per cent to 90 per cent by 2026, helping protect jobs and enhance global competitiveness without raising household bills or taxes. Business groups have long cited the extremely high electricity prices as a major obstacle for UK manufacturers, who currently pay some of the highest energy rates in the developed world. The announcement is being seen as a turning point in helping British firms compete with the fast-growing international industry. Fast-tracking grid access and job creation The strategy also tackles long delays in connecting new projects to the energy grid, with a ‘Connections Accelerator Service’ set to begin by the end of 2025. This will prioritise investment-heavy and job-creating projects, cutting wait times for grid access. Prime Minister Keir Starmer hailed the strategy as a “turning point for Britain’s economy”, offering long-term direction and certainty. “This is how we power Britain’s future, by backing sectors where we lead, removing the barriers that hold us back, and building a stronger economy that works for working people,” he said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves echoed that sentiment, calling it “a giant step forward” for business and innovation. She announced increased funding for the British Business Bank, boosting its capacity to £25.6 billion ($34.26 billion) to support SMEs and high-growth industries. Boosting skills, R&D and innovation To address labour shortages, the government will inject £1.2 billion ($1.6 billion) annually by 2028–29 into skills development, including short courses for high-growth sectors like defence engineering and artificial intelligence (AI). Visa reforms will also be introduced to attract elite global talent. In addition, research and development spending will rise to £22.6 billion ($30.2 billion) annually by the end of the decade, with specific investments in artificial intelligence ($2.67 billion) and advanced manufacturing ($3.74 billion). Regulatory reforms will further clear the way for technologies like biotechnology, autonomous or self-driving vehicles, and clean energy. Industry leaders have welcomed the initiative. Make UK CEO Stephen Phipson called it a “much-needed step” that addresses the sector’s three major challenges: skills shortages, high energy costs, and limited capital access. The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) described it as a “bedrock for growth”. Critics, however, questioned the Labour Party’s ability to sustain the plan. Opposition parties said the strategy admits the high cost of achieving net zero and warned that reforms must avoid burdening taxpayers or leaving small businesses behind. But supporters, including the Trades Union Congress, said lower industrial electricity prices are long overdue. With economic growth faltering—GDP shrank by 0.1 per cent in May—the new strategy represents a significant effort by the UK government to steer the country towards a more competitive, clean, and job-rich future.

UK government plans to cut electricity costs for more than 7,000 firms and create over 1 million skilled jobs under it's 10-year industrial strategy.

UK unveils 10-year industrial strategy to slash energy bills and spur growth

The tragic crash of Air India Flight AI171 in Ahmedabad on June 12—the deadliest aviation disaster in over a decade—is sending shockwaves through the global insurance industry. The crash, which killed 241 passengers and crew along with 33 people on the ground, has triggered an estimated insurance claim of $475 million (₹3,940 crore), making it India’s most expensive aviation insurance payout to date.The Boeing 787 Dreamliner jet was completely destroyed, marking the first-ever total loss of this aircraft model since its introduction in 2011. The massive claim includes approximately $125 million for the hull and engines and over $350 million in liability, covering compensation for loss of life and property damage on the ground under the Montreal Convention. Air India’s fleet is insured for around $20 billion, with annual premiums close to $30 million. However, more than 90 per cent of this financial burden will fall on global reinsurers, primarily based in London and Bermuda.Experts say this high-profile loss is likely to “harden” the global aviation insurance market, pushing premiums sharply higher in the coming renewal cycle. Bloomberg reported that Indian brokers expect increases between 10 per cent and 30 per cent across key coverages such as hull, war-risk, and liability insurance, which is far steeper than hikes seen after previous crashes.<h2>Global ripple effect</h2>While the crash occurred in India, its financial aftershocks will be global. According to insurance experts and market insiders, the scale of the claim means international reinsurers will reprice risk across their entire aviation portfolios. That means airlines around the world are likely to see their premiums rise significantly in the months ahead.“This catastrophe will contribute to global rate hardening,” Sajja Praveen Chowdary, director at Policybazaar for Business, told Bloomberg. “It’s not just an Indian issue. Premiums for hull, liability, and war-risk covers could jump as much as 30 per cent globally.”Aviation insurance claims have already amounted to over $15 billion between 2019 and 2024, according to a report by Allianz SE.&nbsp;With strong growth in air travel in Asia-Pacific and North American regions, total annual aviation premiums were projected to exceed $8 billion even before the Air India crash. Now, analysts warn the number could rise further, especially if more losses occur in the near future.Brokers say insurers may introduce stricter underwriting standards, particularly for wide-body aircraft like the Boeing 787. The cost of coverage may also be passed on to passengers, as airlines operating on thin margins look to offset higher insurance expenses through higher fares or reduced services.<h2>Claim complexities</h2>The claim settlement process is expected to be long and layered, involving multiple insurers, reinsurers, and legal jurisdictions. While Indian insurers like Tata AIG and GIC Re are leading the local cover, they retain only 5-10 per cent of the risk.&nbsp;The rest is reinsured abroad, and a portion of that is further distributed through retrocession, a mechanism by which reinsurers transfer risk to other parties, including global giants like Swiss Re, Munich Re, and various ILS funds.Investigations into the crash are ongoing, with technical failure and potential liability still under scrutiny. Depending on the cause—accident, technical fault, or sabotage—different insurance policies (hull all-risk or war-risk) will be triggered.&nbsp;Compensation for victims will follow international protocols, with each airline liable for up to 113,100 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), equivalent to approximately ₹1.26 crore ($145,143) per victim.

Indian brokers expect increases between 10 per cent and 30 per cent across key coverages such as hull, war-risk, and liability insurance, which is far steeper than hikes seen after previous crashes.

The tragic crash of Air India Flight AI171 in Ahmedabad on June 12—the deadliest aviation disaster in over a decade—is sending shockwaves through the global insurance industry. The crash, which killed 241 passengers and crew along with 33 people on the ground, has triggered an estimated insurance claim of $475 million (₹3,940 crore), making it India’s most expensive aviation insurance payout to date. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner jet was completely destroyed, marking the first-ever total loss of this aircraft model since its introduction in 2011. The massive claim includes approximately $125 million for the hull and engines and over $350 million in liability, covering compensation for loss of life and property damage on the ground under the Montreal Convention. Air India’s fleet is insured for around $20 billion, with annual premiums close to $30 million. However, more than 90 per cent of this financial burden will fall on global reinsurers, primarily based in London and Bermuda. Experts say this high-profile loss is likely to “harden” the global aviation insurance market, pushing premiums sharply higher in the coming renewal cycle. Bloomberg reported that Indian brokers expect increases between 10 per cent and 30 per cent across key coverages such as hull, war-risk, and liability insurance, which is far steeper than hikes seen after previous crashes. Global ripple effect While the crash occurred in India, its financial aftershocks will be global. According to insurance experts and market insiders, the scale of the claim means international reinsurers will reprice risk across their entire aviation portfolios. That means airlines around the world are likely to see their premiums rise significantly in the months ahead. “This catastrophe will contribute to global rate hardening,” Sajja Praveen Chowdary, director at Policybazaar for Business, told Bloomberg. “It’s not just an Indian issue. Premiums for hull, liability, and war-risk covers could jump as much as 30 per cent globally.” Aviation insurance claims have already amounted to over $15 billion between 2019 and 2024, according to a report by Allianz SE. With strong growth in air travel in Asia-Pacific and North American regions, total annual aviation premiums were projected to exceed $8 billion even before the Air India crash. Now, analysts warn the number could rise further, especially if more losses occur in the near future. Brokers say insurers may introduce stricter underwriting standards, particularly for wide-body aircraft like the Boeing 787. The cost of coverage may also be passed on to passengers, as airlines operating on thin margins look to offset higher insurance expenses through higher fares or reduced services. Claim complexities The claim settlement process is expected to be long and layered, involving multiple insurers, reinsurers, and legal jurisdictions. While Indian insurers like Tata AIG and GIC Re are leading the local cover, they retain only 5-10 per cent of the risk. The rest is reinsured abroad, and a portion of that is further distributed through retrocession, a mechanism by which reinsurers transfer risk to other parties, including global giants like Swiss Re, Munich Re, and various ILS funds. Investigations into the crash are ongoing, with technical failure and potential liability still under scrutiny. Depending on the cause—accident, technical fault, or sabotage—different insurance policies (hull all-risk or war-risk) will be triggered. Compensation for victims will follow international protocols, with each airline liable for up to 113,100 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), equivalent to approximately ₹1.26 crore ($145,143) per victim.

Indian brokers expect increases between 10 per cent and 30 per cent across key coverages such as hull, war-risk, and liability insurance, which is far steeper than hikes seen after previous crashes.

Air India crash to inflate aviation insurance bills by 30% worldwide

Global markets kicked off the week on a turbulent note after the United States launched coordinated strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, sending shockwaves across equity, commodity, and currency markets. The Asia-Pacific region bore the brunt of the market reaction on June 23, with major indices across the region posting losses as oil prices spiked and investor sentiment turned risk-averse.Japan’s Nikkei 225 declined 0.56 per cent, while the broader Topix shed 0.49 per cent. In South Korea, the Kospi slid 1.05 per cent, and the tech-heavy Kosdaq dropped 1.78 per cent. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng fell 0.58 per cent, and mainland China’s CSI 300 index lost 0.4 per cent. Meanwhile, Australia’s S&amp;P/ASX 200 fell by 0.76 per cent as commodity stocks came under pressure due to inflation concerns.Oil prices surged on fears of further escalation in West Asia. Brent crude rose 2.14 per cent to trade at $78.66 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude climbed 2.23 per cent to $75.47.&nbsp;Analysts warned that any move by Iran to disrupt shipping through the critical Strait of Hormuz—a transit point for nearly 20 per cent of global oil—could drive Brent prices past $100 per barrel. US equity futures also turned negative in early Asia hours. Futures linked to the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 109 points, or 0.3 per cent, while S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures declined by 0.3 per cent and 0.4 per cent, respectively.<h2>West Asian markets rally on optimism of Iran setback</h2>In stark contrast to the global downtrend, stock markets in Israel and some Gulf countries posted notable gains. Investors in the region viewed the US and Israeli strikes as a strategic victory that may weaken Iran’s nuclear ambitions and delay any immediate retaliation, leading to a short-term boost in confidence.Israel’s Tel Aviv 125 index surged 1.8 per cent on June 22, pushing its weekly gains to nearly 8 per cent. The benchmark TA-35 index climbed 1.5 per cent. The positive sentiment follows last week’s Israeli strikes on Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure, which preceded the American attacks.Markets in other parts of the Gulf also edged higher. Kuwait’s Boursa Premier Market Index rose by nearly 1 per cent, while Oman’s MSX30 Index gained 0.5 per cent. Analysts attributed the rally to hopes that Iran’s ability to project power has been temporarily curbed, potentially opening the door to improved regional security alignments.<h2>Indian equities slide sharply amid global selloff</h2>Indian equity markets mirrored the broader regional sentiment in Asia, with benchmark indices registering steep losses in early trade on June 23.The BSE Sensex crashed over 900 points, opening at 81,704.07 and hitting a low of 81,476.76. The Nifty 50 slipped below the 24,850 mark, falling more than 1 per cent to an intraday low of 24,824.85.&nbsp;Analysts pointed to weak global cues, spiking oil prices, and a strengthening US dollar as the primary drags on sentiment.The rising dollar index, which jumped nearly 0.5 per cent, added to foreign outflow concerns, pressuring Indian equities further. Market participants also flagged fears that sustained high energy costs could erode corporate margins and delay India’s economic recovery momentum.<h2>Bitcoin sinks as crypto markets react to geopolitical uncertainty</h2>Digital assets were among the first to react to the geopolitical shock, with Bitcoin plunging below the $99,000 level over the weekend—its lowest point in more than a month. The cryptocurrency has since rebounded slightly, trading just under $101,000.Ether also experienced a sharp decline, falling over 10 per cent at one point before paring some losses to settle down around 2.5 per cent. Other major cryptocurrencies such as Solana, XRP, and Dogecoin recorded similar sell-offs, dragging down the broader digital asset market.The crypto crash was attributed to a combination of rising inflation fears, potential interest rate volatility, and forced liquidations on derivatives platforms. More than $1 billion in crypto positions were wiped out over a 24-hour span, the vast majority of them from overleveraged long positions.<h2>Safe havens: Dollar gains, gold shows mixed signals</h2>The US dollar rose broadly against Asia-Pacific currencies, benefiting from its safe-haven status amid heightened geopolitical risk.&nbsp;The dollar index climbed 0.26 per cent to 98.969 by mid-morning Singapore time, strengthening against major currencies such as the Japanese yen, Chinese yuan, and South Korean won.The yen weakened 0.31 per cent to 146.52 per dollar, while the South Korean won depreciated 0.45 per cent to 1,380.20. In Southeast Asia, the Philippine peso hit a new low since early April, weakening by 0.78 per cent to 57.573, while the Malaysian ringgit fell 0.64 per cent to 4.2779. The Indonesian rupiah and Thai baht also weakened significantly.Gold, another traditional safe-haven asset, was little changed after an initial surge, trading down 0.1 per cent to $3,363 per ounce. The muted reaction suggests that while investors are cautious, they are not yet pricing in a prolonged or catastrophic geopolitical crisis.Markets now await potential Iranian retaliation, with particular focus on the security of the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;With oil near five-month highs, equity volatility rising, and speculative assets retreating, global markets may be entering a phase of higher uncertainty and tighter financial conditions, unless geopolitical tensions de-escalate.

Asia, US markets slide amid oil surge and geopolitical tensions; Israeli stocks soar, Bitcoin tumbles

Global markets kicked off the week on a turbulent note after the United States launched coordinated strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, sending shockwaves across equity, commodity, and currency markets. The Asia-Pacific region bore the brunt of the market reaction on June 23, with major indices across the region posting losses as oil prices spiked and investor sentiment turned risk-averse. Japan’s Nikkei 225 declined 0.56 per cent, while the broader Topix shed 0.49 per cent. In South Korea, the Kospi slid 1.05 per cent, and the tech-heavy Kosdaq dropped 1.78 per cent. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng fell 0.58 per cent, and mainland China’s CSI 300 index lost 0.4 per cent. Meanwhile, Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 fell by 0.76 per cent as commodity stocks came under pressure due to inflation concerns. Oil prices surged on fears of further escalation in West Asia. Brent crude rose 2.14 per cent to trade at $78.66 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude climbed 2.23 per cent to $75.47. Analysts warned that any move by Iran to disrupt shipping through the critical Strait of Hormuz—a transit point for nearly 20 per cent of global oil—could drive Brent prices past $100 per barrel. US equity futures also turned negative in early Asia hours. Futures linked to the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 109 points, or 0.3 per cent, while S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures declined by 0.3 per cent and 0.4 per cent, respectively. West Asian markets rally on optimism of Iran setback In stark contrast to the global downtrend, stock markets in Israel and some Gulf countries posted notable gains. Investors in the region viewed the US and Israeli strikes as a strategic victory that may weaken Iran’s nuclear ambitions and delay any immediate retaliation, leading to a short-term boost in confidence. Israel’s Tel Aviv 125 index surged 1.8 per cent on June 22, pushing its weekly gains to nearly 8 per cent. The benchmark TA-35 index climbed 1.5 per cent. The positive sentiment follows last week’s Israeli strikes on Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure, which preceded the American attacks. Markets in other parts of the Gulf also edged higher. Kuwait’s Boursa Premier Market Index rose by nearly 1 per cent, while Oman’s MSX30 Index gained 0.5 per cent. Analysts attributed the rally to hopes that Iran’s ability to project power has been temporarily curbed, potentially opening the door to improved regional security alignments. Indian equities slide sharply amid global selloff Indian equity markets mirrored the broader regional sentiment in Asia, with benchmark indices registering steep losses in early trade on June 23. The BSE Sensex crashed over 900 points, opening at 81,704.07 and hitting a low of 81,476.76. The Nifty 50 slipped below the 24,850 mark, falling more than 1 per cent to an intraday low of 24,824.85. Analysts pointed to weak global cues, spiking oil prices, and a strengthening US dollar as the primary drags on sentiment. The rising dollar index, which jumped nearly 0.5 per cent, added to foreign outflow concerns, pressuring Indian equities further. Market participants also flagged fears that sustained high energy costs could erode corporate margins and delay India’s economic recovery momentum. Bitcoin sinks as crypto markets react to geopolitical uncertainty Digital assets were among the first to react to the geopolitical shock, with Bitcoin plunging below the $99,000 level over the weekend—its lowest point in more than a month. The cryptocurrency has since rebounded slightly, trading just under $101,000. Ether also experienced a sharp decline, falling over 10 per cent at one point before paring some losses to settle down around 2.5 per cent. Other major cryptocurrencies such as Solana, XRP, and Dogecoin recorded similar sell-offs, dragging down the broader digital asset market. The crypto crash was attributed to a combination of rising inflation fears, potential interest rate volatility, and forced liquidations on derivatives platforms. More than $1 billion in crypto positions were wiped out over a 24-hour span, the vast majority of them from overleveraged long positions. Safe havens: Dollar gains, gold shows mixed signals The US dollar rose broadly against Asia-Pacific currencies, benefiting from its safe-haven status amid heightened geopolitical risk. The dollar index climbed 0.26 per cent to 98.969 by mid-morning Singapore time, strengthening against major currencies such as the Japanese yen, Chinese yuan, and South Korean won. The yen weakened 0.31 per cent to 146.52 per dollar, while the South Korean won depreciated 0.45 per cent to 1,380.20. In Southeast Asia, the Philippine peso hit a new low since early April, weakening by 0.78 per cent to 57.573, while the Malaysian ringgit fell 0.64 per cent to 4.2779. The Indonesian rupiah and Thai baht also weakened significantly. Gold, another traditional safe-haven asset, was little changed after an initial surge, trading down 0.1 per cent to $3,363 per ounce. The muted reaction suggests that while investors are cautious, they are not yet pricing in a prolonged or catastrophic geopolitical crisis. Markets now await potential Iranian retaliation, with particular focus on the security of the Strait of Hormuz. With oil near five-month highs, equity volatility rising, and speculative assets retreating, global markets may be entering a phase of higher uncertainty and tighter financial conditions, unless geopolitical tensions de-escalate.

Asia, US markets slide amid oil surge and geopolitical tensions; Israeli markets and other West Asian markets soar, Bitcoin tumbles.

Global markets rattle after US strikes on Iran; West Asian markets defy the trend

The recent US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have plunged the global aviation industry into disarray, as commercial airlines scramble to avoid increasingly volatile West Asian airspace.&nbsp;The strikes, which targeted three nuclear sites in Iran, have prompted widespread cancellations and rerouting of flights, exacerbating an already strained air travel sector still adjusting to older conflict zones like Russia and Ukraine.Airlines including British Airways, Singapore Airlines, and Air France-KLM swiftly suspended flights to key West Asian hubs like Dubai, Doha, and Riyadh. American carriers like United Airlines and American Airlines had preemptively halted operations to Qatar and Dubai days before the strikes.&nbsp;According to real-time data from FlightRadar24, commercial traffic has nearly vanished from the skies over Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Israel, with aircraft rerouted through longer paths via the Caspian Sea in the north or Egypt and Saudi Arabia in the south.This rerouting is not merely a precautionary measure; it has become an operational necessity. The region, which has grown in importance as a flight corridor between Europe and Asia after Russian and Ukrainian airspace became inaccessible, is now largely restricted.&nbsp;Airlines are navigating around the conflict zones at the cost of increased fuel consumption, extended flight durations, and heavier crew workloads.<h2>Airline ops and economics take a hit</h2>The ripple effects on operations are extensive. Airlines face mounting pressure from fuel expenses, which already constitute up to 40 per cent of their operating costs.&nbsp;As flights detour for safety, they require extra fuel—the cost of which is already on the rise and is expected to hit $100 per barrel if the situation is not controlled—which is pushing margins thinner and leaving carriers with little option but to pass on the cost to consumers.&nbsp;Industry estimates suggest that airfares could increase by 10-20 per cent in the coming weeks, especially for long-haul routes that are now significantly longer due to rerouting.The longer flight times are also affecting airline logistics and crew rotations. Aircraft availability is being stretched as round-trip schedules lengthen, placing greater strain on maintenance windows and crew duty rosters.&nbsp;Delays and cancellations are expected to rise further as carriers adjust to the evolving security landscape. Analysts warn that this will not only disrupt commercial passenger flights but may also have serious implications for the aviation supply chain, affecting cargo movement and the availability of aircraft parts and personnel.Consumers are already feeling the pinch. Apart from potential fare hikes, passengers are experiencing travel delays, extended layovers, and reduced flight availability. Routes that once took four to five hours are now clocking in at eight hours or more. This means that vacationers and business travellers alike will be paying more for longer flights.Meanwhile, the impact on the broader travel and tourism sector is becoming increasingly evident. With war-related uncertainty looming large, demand for international travel is expected to dip, particularly to and via West Asia.&nbsp;Historically, tourism is among the first sectors to suffer when geopolitical conflicts arise, and this episode appears no different. Tour operators, hotels, and regional tourism boards are already bracing for a slowdown in bookings and a potential slump in revenues.Insurance costs are likely to rise as well, as travellers seek enhanced protection amid heightened risks. Enhanced policies that include trip cancellation and emergency evacuation coverage are expected to become more common.&nbsp;<h2>India’s lane gets narrower</h2>For India the situation becomes particularly tricky as the recent developments further shrink its already restricted air routes, as Pakistan's airspace remains closed for India.Indian airlines have implemented contingency plans, with alternative routes mapped through Central Asia or Africa, depending on how the situation unfolds. The flights flying to and from India are also expected to add more stops for fuelling.Air India alone has reportedly diverted or returned 17 flights due to the security situation, operating under strict guidance from international aviation regulators.As the global aviation industry adapts to this fresh wave of instability, the economic costs are likely to mount, and recovery may be slow and uneven. With summer travel demand peaking and fuel markets on edge over a possible oil price rally, passengers and airlines alike face a turbulent season ahead.

Global aviation reels as airlines cancel flights, reroute journeys, and grapple with economic fallout.

The recent US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have plunged the global aviation industry into disarray, as commercial airlines scramble to avoid increasingly volatile West Asian airspace. The strikes, which targeted three nuclear sites in Iran, have prompted widespread cancellations and rerouting of flights, exacerbating an already strained air travel sector still adjusting to older conflict zones like Russia and Ukraine. Airlines including British Airways, Singapore Airlines, and Air France-KLM swiftly suspended flights to key West Asian hubs like Dubai, Doha, and Riyadh. American carriers like United Airlines and American Airlines had preemptively halted operations to Qatar and Dubai days before the strikes. According to real-time data from FlightRadar24, commercial traffic has nearly vanished from the skies over Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Israel, with aircraft rerouted through longer paths via the Caspian Sea in the north or Egypt and Saudi Arabia in the south. This rerouting is not merely a precautionary measure; it has become an operational necessity. The region, which has grown in importance as a flight corridor between Europe and Asia after Russian and Ukrainian airspace became inaccessible, is now largely restricted. Airlines are navigating around the conflict zones at the cost of increased fuel consumption, extended flight durations, and heavier crew workloads. Airline ops and economics take a hit The ripple effects on operations are extensive. Airlines face mounting pressure from fuel expenses, which already constitute up to 40 per cent of their operating costs. As flights detour for safety, they require extra fuel—the cost of which is already on the rise and is expected to hit $100 per barrel if the situation is not controlled—which is pushing margins thinner and leaving carriers with little option but to pass on the cost to consumers. Industry estimates suggest that airfares could increase by 10-20 per cent in the coming weeks, especially for long-haul routes that are now significantly longer due to rerouting. The longer flight times are also affecting airline logistics and crew rotations. Aircraft availability is being stretched as round-trip schedules lengthen, placing greater strain on maintenance windows and crew duty rosters. Delays and cancellations are expected to rise further as carriers adjust to the evolving security landscape. Analysts warn that this will not only disrupt commercial passenger flights but may also have serious implications for the aviation supply chain, affecting cargo movement and the availability of aircraft parts and personnel. Consumers are already feeling the pinch. Apart from potential fare hikes, passengers are experiencing travel delays, extended layovers, and reduced flight availability. Routes that once took four to five hours are now clocking in at eight hours or more. This means that vacationers and business travellers alike will be paying more for longer flights. Meanwhile, the impact on the broader travel and tourism sector is becoming increasingly evident. With war-related uncertainty looming large, demand for international travel is expected to dip, particularly to and via West Asia. Historically, tourism is among the first sectors to suffer when geopolitical conflicts arise, and this episode appears no different. Tour operators, hotels, and regional tourism boards are already bracing for a slowdown in bookings and a potential slump in revenues. Insurance costs are likely to rise as well, as travellers seek enhanced protection amid heightened risks. Enhanced policies that include trip cancellation and emergency evacuation coverage are expected to become more common. India’s lane gets narrower For India the situation becomes particularly tricky as the recent developments further shrink its already restricted air routes, as Pakistan's airspace remains closed for India. Indian airlines have implemented contingency plans, with alternative routes mapped through Central Asia or Africa, depending on how the situation unfolds. The flights flying to and from India are also expected to add more stops for fuelling. Air India alone has reportedly diverted or returned 17 flights due to the security situation, operating under strict guidance from international aviation regulators. As the global aviation industry adapts to this fresh wave of instability, the economic costs are likely to mount, and recovery may be slow and uneven. With summer travel demand peaking and fuel markets on edge over a possible oil price rally, passengers and airlines alike face a turbulent season ahead.

Global aviation reels as airlines cancel flights, reroute journeys, and grapple with economic fallout.

Aviation sector hits turbulence: West Asian conflict fuels flight delays and rising fares

Oil prices surged on June 23, marking their highest levels since January, as escalating tensions between the United States and Iran sparked fears of significant disruptions to global oil supply.&nbsp;The price of Brent crude futures rose by $1.92, or 2.49 per cent, to $78.93 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude advanced by $1.89, or 2.56 per cent, to $75.73 per barrel. The surge followed airstrikes over the weekend by the US on three of Iran's main nuclear sites, raising alarm over the potential for retaliatory actions from Tehran.The military strikes, which targeted key facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, marked a significant escalation in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, with the US joining Israel in its offensive against Iran’s nuclear capabilities.&nbsp;As a result, oil traders responded to the uncertainty in West Asia by pushing prices to new highs, briefly touching $81.40 per barrel for Brent and $78.40 for WTI, before some of the gains were pared back.The primary concern for oil markets is the potential for Iran to retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint through which about a fifth of the global oil supply passes. Iran’s parliament has already approved a measure to close the waterway, but the final decision rests with the country’s National Security Council.&nbsp;The closure of the strait could have a profound impact on global oil flows, leading to a sharp increase in prices. Analysts warned that if Iran takes such an action, it could drive Brent crude to $100 per barrel, exacerbating inflationary pressures worldwide.West Asia, home to one-third of global oil production, remains a major focal point for oil price volatility. With both Iran and Saudi Arabia among the world’s largest oil exporters, any escalation in hostilities could trigger significant disruptions to oil infrastructure in the region.&nbsp;Furthermore, the US response to any Iranian retaliation remains unclear, with Trump administration officials suggesting that further military action could be forthcoming should Iran strike back.Despite the recent price increases, analysts caution that oil markets are still vulnerable to the risk of supply disruptions and geopolitical developments.&nbsp;Goldman Sachs has warned that the geopolitical risk premium currently priced into oil futures may not last unless there is a tangible disruption to supply. If tensions ease and oil flows remain uninterrupted, prices could stabilise or even decline, as OPEC+ nations have ramped up production in recent months to meet global demand. However, with the situation in West Asia continuing to evolve, the outlook remains uncertain.<h2>Impact on global economy and energy markets</h2>The surging oil prices have raised concerns about the broader economic implications, especially for countries heavily reliant on oil imports. Nations like India, which imports a significant portion of its crude oil, are particularly vulnerable to rising prices.&nbsp;Analysts suggest that even a modest increase in oil prices could strain India’s economy by raising inflation and increasing the cost of essential goods, such as transportation and manufacturing inputs.The ongoing tensions between the US and Iran also have broader implications for global energy markets. In addition to the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz, Iran may choose to target other oil infrastructure in the region, or even its export terminals, which could exacerbate the supply shock.&nbsp;However, it is also possible that the conflict could de-escalate, as has occurred in the past, and the global oil supply could return to normal, leading to a reduction in prices.Despite the uncertainties, oil markets have been on a steady upward trajectory since early June, with Brent crude prices climbing by 13 per cent since the conflict began. The volatility seen in recent weeks is expected to continue as traders monitor developments in West Asia closely.&nbsp;The meeting of OPEC+ members on July 5 will be a key event to watch, as decisions on further production increases may influence the market’s ability to manage supply and demand amidst growing geopolitical risks.As the situation unfolds, the oil market remains in flux, and both producers and consumers will be closely watching for signs of further escalation or potential de-escalation in the region.

Oil traders responded to the uncertainty in West Asia by pushing prices to new highs, briefly touching $81.40 per barrel for Brent and $78.40 for WTI, before some of the gains were pared back.

Oil prices surged on June 23, marking their highest levels since January, as escalating tensions between the United States and Iran sparked fears of significant disruptions to global oil supply. The price of Brent crude futures rose by $1.92, or 2.49 per cent, to $78.93 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude advanced by $1.89, or 2.56 per cent, to $75.73 per barrel. The surge followed airstrikes over the weekend by the US on three of Iran's main nuclear sites, raising alarm over the potential for retaliatory actions from Tehran. The military strikes, which targeted key facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, marked a significant escalation in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, with the US joining Israel in its offensive against Iran’s nuclear capabilities. As a result, oil traders responded to the uncertainty in West Asia by pushing prices to new highs, briefly touching $81.40 per barrel for Brent and $78.40 for WTI, before some of the gains were pared back. The primary concern for oil markets is the potential for Iran to retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint through which about a fifth of the global oil supply passes. Iran’s parliament has already approved a measure to close the waterway, but the final decision rests with the country’s National Security Council. The closure of the strait could have a profound impact on global oil flows, leading to a sharp increase in prices. Analysts warned that if Iran takes such an action, it could drive Brent crude to $100 per barrel, exacerbating inflationary pressures worldwide. West Asia, home to one-third of global oil production, remains a major focal point for oil price volatility. With both Iran and Saudi Arabia among the world’s largest oil exporters, any escalation in hostilities could trigger significant disruptions to oil infrastructure in the region. Furthermore, the US response to any Iranian retaliation remains unclear, with Trump administration officials suggesting that further military action could be forthcoming should Iran strike back. Despite the recent price increases, analysts caution that oil markets are still vulnerable to the risk of supply disruptions and geopolitical developments. Goldman Sachs has warned that the geopolitical risk premium currently priced into oil futures may not last unless there is a tangible disruption to supply. If tensions ease and oil flows remain uninterrupted, prices could stabilise or even decline, as OPEC+ nations have ramped up production in recent months to meet global demand. However, with the situation in West Asia continuing to evolve, the outlook remains uncertain. Impact on global economy and energy markets The surging oil prices have raised concerns about the broader economic implications, especially for countries heavily reliant on oil imports. Nations like India, which imports a significant portion of its crude oil, are particularly vulnerable to rising prices. Analysts suggest that even a modest increase in oil prices could strain India’s economy by raising inflation and increasing the cost of essential goods, such as transportation and manufacturing inputs. The ongoing tensions between the US and Iran also have broader implications for global energy markets. In addition to the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz, Iran may choose to target other oil infrastructure in the region, or even its export terminals, which could exacerbate the supply shock. However, it is also possible that the conflict could de-escalate, as has occurred in the past, and the global oil supply could return to normal, leading to a reduction in prices. Despite the uncertainties, oil markets have been on a steady upward trajectory since early June, with Brent crude prices climbing by 13 per cent since the conflict began. The volatility seen in recent weeks is expected to continue as traders monitor developments in West Asia closely. The meeting of OPEC+ members on July 5 will be a key event to watch, as decisions on further production increases may influence the market’s ability to manage supply and demand amidst growing geopolitical risks. As the situation unfolds, the oil market remains in flux, and both producers and consumers will be closely watching for signs of further escalation or potential de-escalation in the region.

Oil traders responded to the uncertainty in West Asia by pushing prices to new highs, briefly touching $81.40 per barrel for Brent and $78.40 for WTI, before some of the gains were pared back.

Brent crude hits five-month high amid US-Iran tensions, risks of supply disruptions loom

On June 22, the United States launched airstrikes on Iran’s key nuclear facilities, marking another escalation in a tense, 10-day-long conflict involving Israel and Iran. The strikes, which targeted Iran’s uranium enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, seem to have far-reaching consequences for global oil markets as the world witnesses a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape.The US attack follows days of mounting speculation about whether the Donald Trump-led administration would intervene in the conflict between Israel and Iran. While Israel had already been bombing Iranian sites for over a week, the US airstrikes have taken the conflict to a new level. Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia.For years, the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway between Oman and Iran—has been a focal point of geopolitical tensions. This vital chokepoint facilitates the transit of about 20 per cent of the world’s crude oil, making any potential disruption here a major concern for oil-dependent economies worldwide.<h2>Oil prices surge as a direct consequence of the conflict</h2>Following the US strikes, oil prices have already begun to show signs of volatility, with Brent Crude futures surging by 11 per cent over the past week.&nbsp;On June 22, as the markets opened, prices were hovering around $80 per barrel, fuelled by the uncertainty surrounding the conflict and the potential for further disruption. Analysts believe this is just the beginning, with prices expected to rise even more if the conflict continues to intensify.A supply disruption, particularly a blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, would have catastrophic effects on global oil prices. Already, analysts warn that crude oil prices could rise by 15 per cent to 20 per cent if the conflict results in a daily loss of 1.1 million barrels in production.&nbsp;More severe disruptions could push Brent crude prices above $90 per barrel or even $100 per barrel if Iran retaliates by targeting oil infrastructure or closing off key shipping lanes.<h2>Global oil supply faces a murky situation</h2>The global oil market is already in a precarious position, with OPEC+ planning a production hike in July, increasing output by 4.11 million barrels per day. Despite this, analysts remain concerned that these measures may not be sufficient to cushion the shock of an escalation in the Gulf.&nbsp;Given that Iran is the third-largest member of OPEC+, the loss of its oil exports could exacerbate supply shortages, leading to even higher prices.Though some analysts believe that global supply can be stabilised through increased output from other OPEC members, the region’s fragile geopolitical situation makes this approach uncertain.&nbsp;Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait, among others, also rely on the Strait of Hormuz for shipping their crude, and any serious disruption could lead to further instability in the region.<h2>India’s vulnerability as an oil-dependent economy at risk</h2>For India, the stakes are particularly high. The country relies heavily on oil imports from West Asia, with around 40 per cent of its oil and over 50 per cent of its LNG transiting through the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;If the waterway is blocked, India could face significant economic consequences, including soaring fuel prices and inflation.India consumes approximately 5.5 million barrels of oil per day, with 1.5 million barrels passing through the Strait. The potential disruption of this critical shipping lane could push oil prices much higher, further adding to inflationary pressures in the country.&nbsp;According to experts, any blockade of the Strait would likely push India’s crude oil costs higher, which in turn would affect the country’s GDP by around 0.5 per cent for every $10 increase in crude prices.The country’s oil marketing companies, such as HPCL, BPCL, and Indian Oil, would feel the brunt of this price spike, as would sectors like aviation, paint manufacturers, and tyre companies that rely on oil products. This could also lead to a potential slowdown in India’s economic growth, particularly in the face of rising inflation.To mitigate these risks, India’s Petroleum Minister, Hardeep Puri, has assured that the country is diversifying its crude oil sources. India plans to cut refined product exports and explore alternative suppliers if the Strait is blocked.&nbsp;Puri emphasised, “We have enough diversified supplies of crude, and even if there were to be a disruption, we can source it from alternative suppliers.”<h2>Iran’s threat to close the Strait: An existential move?</h2>One of the most significant threats arising from this conflict is Iran’s repeated warnings that it may close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US and Israeli military actions. While Iran has made similar threats in the past, it has never followed through, as doing so would also harm its own oil exports.However, the current situation is different. With the US now directly involved in the conflict, the risk of an Iranian retaliation is higher than ever. Experts believe that if Iran does take such an extreme step, it could severely disrupt global oil flows, particularly for countries like India and China, which are major importers of Iranian oil.While closing the Strait would certainly hurt global oil supply, it could also backfire on Iran, as the country depends on this route for its own oil exports. China, Iran’s largest oil trading partner, is unlikely to stand by as its oil shipments are affected. China’s influence in this situation could pressure Iran to reconsider any drastic actions.<h2>Fragile peace or an all-out oil war?</h2>As the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates, oil markets remain on edge. If the situation devolves into an all-out confrontation, the consequences for the global economy could be severe.&nbsp;For now, experts suggest that the geopolitical risk premium on oil will remain high, and the global oil market will have to navigate a delicate balance between supply disruptions and geopolitical manoeuvring.As the situation develops, much will depend on how quickly Iran decides to retaliate, whether the US will escalate its involvement, and how OPEC+ members respond to the changing supply dynamics.

Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia.

On June 22, the United States launched airstrikes on Iran’s key nuclear facilities, marking another escalation in a tense, 10-day-long conflict involving Israel and Iran. The strikes, which targeted Iran’s uranium enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, seem to have far-reaching consequences for global oil markets as the world witnesses a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape. The US attack follows days of mounting speculation about whether the Donald Trump-led administration would intervene in the conflict between Israel and Iran. While Israel had already been bombing Iranian sites for over a week, the US airstrikes have taken the conflict to a new level. Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia. For years, the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway between Oman and Iran—has been a focal point of geopolitical tensions. This vital chokepoint facilitates the transit of about 20 per cent of the world’s crude oil, making any potential disruption here a major concern for oil-dependent economies worldwide. Oil prices surge as a direct consequence of the conflict Following the US strikes, oil prices have already begun to show signs of volatility, with Brent Crude futures surging by 11 per cent over the past week. On June 22, as the markets opened, prices were hovering around $80 per barrel, fuelled by the uncertainty surrounding the conflict and the potential for further disruption. Analysts believe this is just the beginning, with prices expected to rise even more if the conflict continues to intensify. A supply disruption, particularly a blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, would have catastrophic effects on global oil prices. Already, analysts warn that crude oil prices could rise by 15 per cent to 20 per cent if the conflict results in a daily loss of 1.1 million barrels in production. More severe disruptions could push Brent crude prices above $90 per barrel or even $100 per barrel if Iran retaliates by targeting oil infrastructure or closing off key shipping lanes. Global oil supply faces a murky situation The global oil market is already in a precarious position, with OPEC+ planning a production hike in July, increasing output by 4.11 million barrels per day. Despite this, analysts remain concerned that these measures may not be sufficient to cushion the shock of an escalation in the Gulf. Given that Iran is the third-largest member of OPEC+, the loss of its oil exports could exacerbate supply shortages, leading to even higher prices. Though some analysts believe that global supply can be stabilised through increased output from other OPEC members, the region’s fragile geopolitical situation makes this approach uncertain. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait, among others, also rely on the Strait of Hormuz for shipping their crude, and any serious disruption could lead to further instability in the region. India’s vulnerability as an oil-dependent economy at risk For India, the stakes are particularly high. The country relies heavily on oil imports from West Asia, with around 40 per cent of its oil and over 50 per cent of its LNG transiting through the Strait of Hormuz. If the waterway is blocked, India could face significant economic consequences, including soaring fuel prices and inflation. India consumes approximately 5.5 million barrels of oil per day, with 1.5 million barrels passing through the Strait. The potential disruption of this critical shipping lane could push oil prices much higher, further adding to inflationary pressures in the country. According to experts, any blockade of the Strait would likely push India’s crude oil costs higher, which in turn would affect the country’s GDP by around 0.5 per cent for every $10 increase in crude prices. The country’s oil marketing companies, such as HPCL, BPCL, and Indian Oil, would feel the brunt of this price spike, as would sectors like aviation, paint manufacturers, and tyre companies that rely on oil products. This could also lead to a potential slowdown in India’s economic growth, particularly in the face of rising inflation. To mitigate these risks, India’s Petroleum Minister, Hardeep Puri, has assured that the country is diversifying its crude oil sources. India plans to cut refined product exports and explore alternative suppliers if the Strait is blocked. Puri emphasised, “We have enough diversified supplies of crude, and even if there were to be a disruption, we can source it from alternative suppliers.” Iran’s threat to close the Strait: An existential move? One of the most significant threats arising from this conflict is Iran’s repeated warnings that it may close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US and Israeli military actions. While Iran has made similar threats in the past, it has never followed through, as doing so would also harm its own oil exports. However, the current situation is different. With the US now directly involved in the conflict, the risk of an Iranian retaliation is higher than ever. Experts believe that if Iran does take such an extreme step, it could severely disrupt global oil flows, particularly for countries like India and China, which are major importers of Iranian oil. While closing the Strait would certainly hurt global oil supply, it could also backfire on Iran, as the country depends on this route for its own oil exports. China, Iran’s largest oil trading partner, is unlikely to stand by as its oil shipments are affected. China’s influence in this situation could pressure Iran to reconsider any drastic actions. Fragile peace or an all-out oil war? As the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates, oil markets remain on edge. If the situation devolves into an all-out confrontation, the consequences for the global economy could be severe. For now, experts suggest that the geopolitical risk premium on oil will remain high, and the global oil market will have to navigate a delicate balance between supply disruptions and geopolitical manoeuvring. As the situation develops, much will depend on how quickly Iran decides to retaliate, whether the US will escalate its involvement, and how OPEC+ members respond to the changing supply dynamics.

Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia.

US attacks Iranian nuclear sites: What lies ahead as geopolitical tensions rise

Tesla’s long-awaited foray into autonomous ride-hailing began on June 22, in Austin, Texas, marking a pivotal moment in Elon Musk's ambitious vision for the future of transportation. A fleet of approximately 10 Model Y SUVs will operate in a geofenced area of the city, offering a limited, invitation-only robotaxi service to early testers.&nbsp;This marks the first real-world deployment of Tesla's autonomous driving technology, but the service will be heavily restricted. Trips will be unavailable in bad weather, and passengers under 18 will be excluded. Additionally, a Tesla safety monitor will sit in the front passenger seat during the initial phase of testing.Tesla plans to expand the service to up to 1,000 vehicles within months, with Musk teasing the eventual introduction of a fully autonomous “cybercab” that will operate without pedals or a steering wheel.&nbsp;However, Tesla has made it clear that safety will remain a priority, with Musk admitting to being “super paranoid” about the rollout’s potential risks. For now, the general public will have to wait as Tesla fine-tunes the technology.<h2>A gamble for Tesla’s future amid growing competition</h2>The robotaxi service is seen as a critical test for both Tesla’s self-driving capabilities and the company’s future business prospects. Investors are banking on autonomous vehicles as a key driver of Tesla’s next phase of growth. Wall Street analysts predict that if the service succeeds, it could push Tesla's market capitalisation to over $2 trillion by the end of next year.&nbsp;However, as Tesla enters the crowded autonomous vehicle space, it faces strong competition from Alphabet’s Waymo, which already operates a commercial robotaxi service in several US cities.Tesla is betting that its vision of using cameras alone, rather than the more commonly employed lidar and radar systems, will be both safer and more cost-effective. But the company is also acutely aware of the risks, having seen competitors like GM’s Cruise and Uber pull back from their own self-driving ambitions following incidents involving fatalities.<h2>Teleoperation and safety concerns</h2>As part of its cautious approach, Tesla will rely on a teleoperation system where remote operators can take control of the robotaxis in certain situations. This method, used by other autonomous vehicle companies like Waymo, allows humans to intervene when a vehicle encounters a scenario it cannot handle on its own.&nbsp;However, experts warn that teleoperation has inherent risks, particularly when it comes to cellular data connectivity, which could experience lag or drop entirely in crucial moments.“The technology may work for a small test deployment, but once scaled up, the risks become more significant,” Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, told Reuters. Tesla’s strategy will be closely scrutinised by regulators and safety advocates, especially as the company pushes for broader deployment.Despite these hurdles, the stakes for Tesla are high. The robotaxi service is poised to redefine the transportation landscape and could serve as a pivotal factor in Tesla’s efforts to maintain its leadership in the electric vehicle and AI-driven industries.

Tesla's robotaxi service is seen as a critical test for both its self-driving capabilities and the company’s future business prospects. Investors are banking on autonomous vehicles as a key driver of Tesla’s next phase of growth.

Tesla’s long-awaited foray into autonomous ride-hailing began on June 22, in Austin, Texas, marking a pivotal moment in Elon Musk's ambitious vision for the future of transportation. A fleet of approximately 10 Model Y SUVs will operate in a geofenced area of the city, offering a limited, invitation-only robotaxi service to early testers. This marks the first real-world deployment of Tesla's autonomous driving technology, but the service will be heavily restricted. Trips will be unavailable in bad weather, and passengers under 18 will be excluded. Additionally, a Tesla safety monitor will sit in the front passenger seat during the initial phase of testing. Tesla plans to expand the service to up to 1,000 vehicles within months, with Musk teasing the eventual introduction of a fully autonomous “cybercab” that will operate without pedals or a steering wheel. However, Tesla has made it clear that safety will remain a priority, with Musk admitting to being “super paranoid” about the rollout’s potential risks. For now, the general public will have to wait as Tesla fine-tunes the technology. A gamble for Tesla’s future amid growing competition The robotaxi service is seen as a critical test for both Tesla’s self-driving capabilities and the company’s future business prospects. Investors are banking on autonomous vehicles as a key driver of Tesla’s next phase of growth. Wall Street analysts predict that if the service succeeds, it could push Tesla's market capitalisation to over $2 trillion by the end of next year. However, as Tesla enters the crowded autonomous vehicle space, it faces strong competition from Alphabet’s Waymo, which already operates a commercial robotaxi service in several US cities. Tesla is betting that its vision of using cameras alone, rather than the more commonly employed lidar and radar systems, will be both safer and more cost-effective. But the company is also acutely aware of the risks, having seen competitors like GM’s Cruise and Uber pull back from their own self-driving ambitions following incidents involving fatalities. Teleoperation and safety concerns As part of its cautious approach, Tesla will rely on a teleoperation system where remote operators can take control of the robotaxis in certain situations. This method, used by other autonomous vehicle companies like Waymo, allows humans to intervene when a vehicle encounters a scenario it cannot handle on its own. However, experts warn that teleoperation has inherent risks, particularly when it comes to cellular data connectivity, which could experience lag or drop entirely in crucial moments. “The technology may work for a small test deployment, but once scaled up, the risks become more significant,” Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, told Reuters. Tesla’s strategy will be closely scrutinised by regulators and safety advocates, especially as the company pushes for broader deployment. Despite these hurdles, the stakes for Tesla are high. The robotaxi service is poised to redefine the transportation landscape and could serve as a pivotal factor in Tesla’s efforts to maintain its leadership in the electric vehicle and AI-driven industries.

Tesla's robotaxi service is seen as a critical test for both its self-driving capabilities and the company’s future business prospects. Investors are banking on autonomous vehicles as a key driver of Tesla’s next phase of growth.

Tesla’s robotaxi service begins in Austin: Will Musk's vision finally deliver?

China’s real estate sector, once the backbone of the nation’s economic growth, continues to struggle through a prolonged downturn since late 2020. Even as first-tier cities show signs of stabilisation, much of the country remains mired in oversupply, falling prices, and sagging demand compounded by a shrinking population and shifting investor sentiment.New government data released this week revealed that average new home prices across 70 cities fell 0.2 per cent in May, while second-hand home prices dropped by 0.5 per cent. These are the sharpest monthly declines in seven and eight months, respectively.&nbsp;Investment in real estate was down 10.7 per cent in the first five months of 2025, extending a four-year slump that began with developer defaults and escalating debt crises in late 2020.Premier Li Qiang recently called for “greater efforts” to halt the decline, but the data makes clear why Beijing is still struggling to restore confidence in the housing sector.<h2>Demographic drag deepens</h2>A more worrying headwind now confronting the market is demographic. Goldman Sachs estimates that China’s urban housing demand will remain below 5 million units per year in the coming years, a quarter of the 2017 peak of 20 million. Population decline, ageing, and continued urbanisation slowdown are behind the projection.China’s population has fallen for three consecutive years, dropping by 1.39 million in 2024 alone, according to government figures. Birth rates continue to slide despite incentives introduced since the end of the one-child policy in 2016.&nbsp;“Pronatalist policies are unlikely to succeed,” Tianchen Xu, senior economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit, told&nbsp;CNBC. “They fail to address deeper issues like economic insecurity, costly childrearing, and cultural shifts.”The result: school closures and crumbling demand in areas previously buoyed by education-linked housing premiums. Nearly 36,000 kindergartens shut down over the past two years, and student enrolment in preschools fell by more than 10 million.&nbsp;A mother living in Beijing told&nbsp;CNBC&nbsp;that her apartment, purchased at double the city’s average to secure access to a top elementary school, has lost 20 per cent of its value in just two years.<h2>A tale of two markets</h2>While tier-I cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen are showing flickers of recovery, smaller, lower-tier cities are in freefall. Sales in Shanghai have risen year-on-year, and developers are seeing some projects sell out on launch day.&nbsp;Greentown China Holdings, for example, sold all 120 units of a luxury project in Shanghai within hours, generating nearly $1 billion. In contrast, places like Wenzhou face a bleak outlook. Developers continue to slash prices by as much as 50 per cent to entice scarce demand.According to analysts at S&amp;P Global Ratings, property prices in top-tier cities will remain flat in 2025, with modest gains in 2026. Meanwhile, homes in smaller cities are expected to drop another 4 per cent this year and 2 per cent next year.&nbsp;<h2>Global capital shifts to Japan</h2>As China’s property market languishes, global investors are looking elsewhere. Japan’s real estate sector has emerged as a major beneficiary. Foreign investors, including those from mainland China and Hong Kong, poured $11.2 billion into Japanese real estate in Q1 2025—6 per cent above the five-year average.The weakening yen and Japan’s strong rental returns, averaging over 5 per cent annually since 2012, have further boosted investor appeal.Major deals include co-living operator Weave Living and KKR’s acquisition of six high-end properties in Tokyo and MindWorks Properties’ purchase of a multifamily building in Minato Ward.Despite targeted policies like mortgage rate cuts and subsidies for unfinished projects, analysts warn that any broad recovery remains elusive. Goldman Sachs predicts stabilisation may not arrive until the second half of 2026. The bifurcation of China’s housing market highlights the need for more nuanced, region-specific interventions.

Shrinking population, regional disparities, and investor flight define an uneven property landscape in China.

China’s real estate sector, once the backbone of the nation’s economic growth, continues to struggle through a prolonged downturn since late 2020. Even as first-tier cities show signs of stabilisation, much of the country remains mired in oversupply, falling prices, and sagging demand compounded by a shrinking population and shifting investor sentiment. New government data released this week revealed that average new home prices across 70 cities fell 0.2 per cent in May, while second-hand home prices dropped by 0.5 per cent. These are the sharpest monthly declines in seven and eight months, respectively. Investment in real estate was down 10.7 per cent in the first five months of 2025, extending a four-year slump that began with developer defaults and escalating debt crises in late 2020. Premier Li Qiang recently called for “greater efforts” to halt the decline, but the data makes clear why Beijing is still struggling to restore confidence in the housing sector. Demographic drag deepens A more worrying headwind now confronting the market is demographic. Goldman Sachs estimates that China’s urban housing demand will remain below 5 million units per year in the coming years, a quarter of the 2017 peak of 20 million. Population decline, ageing, and continued urbanisation slowdown are behind the projection. China’s population has fallen for three consecutive years, dropping by 1.39 million in 2024 alone, according to government figures. Birth rates continue to slide despite incentives introduced since the end of the one-child policy in 2016. “Pronatalist policies are unlikely to succeed,” Tianchen Xu, senior economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit, told CNBC. “They fail to address deeper issues like economic insecurity, costly childrearing, and cultural shifts.” The result: school closures and crumbling demand in areas previously buoyed by education-linked housing premiums. Nearly 36,000 kindergartens shut down over the past two years, and student enrolment in preschools fell by more than 10 million. A mother living in Beijing told CNBC that her apartment, purchased at double the city’s average to secure access to a top elementary school, has lost 20 per cent of its value in just two years. A tale of two markets While tier-I cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen are showing flickers of recovery, smaller, lower-tier cities are in freefall. Sales in Shanghai have risen year-on-year, and developers are seeing some projects sell out on launch day. Greentown China Holdings, for example, sold all 120 units of a luxury project in Shanghai within hours, generating nearly $1 billion. In contrast, places like Wenzhou face a bleak outlook. Developers continue to slash prices by as much as 50 per cent to entice scarce demand. According to analysts at S&P Global Ratings, property prices in top-tier cities will remain flat in 2025, with modest gains in 2026. Meanwhile, homes in smaller cities are expected to drop another 4 per cent this year and 2 per cent next year. Global capital shifts to Japan As China’s property market languishes, global investors are looking elsewhere. Japan’s real estate sector has emerged as a major beneficiary. Foreign investors, including those from mainland China and Hong Kong, poured $11.2 billion into Japanese real estate in Q1 2025—6 per cent above the five-year average. The weakening yen and Japan’s strong rental returns, averaging over 5 per cent annually since 2012, have further boosted investor appeal. Major deals include co-living operator Weave Living and KKR’s acquisition of six high-end properties in Tokyo and MindWorks Properties’ purchase of a multifamily building in Minato Ward. Despite targeted policies like mortgage rate cuts and subsidies for unfinished projects, analysts warn that any broad recovery remains elusive. Goldman Sachs predicts stabilisation may not arrive until the second half of 2026. The bifurcation of China’s housing market highlights the need for more nuanced, region-specific interventions.

Shrinking population, regional disparities, and investor flight define an uneven property landscape in China.

China’s housing market: A crisis deepened by demographics, but who is it benefitting?

As political tensions rise between Europe and the United States under Donald Trump’s second presidency, more and more Europeans are seeking to reduce their dependence on American tech giants. From grassroots efforts to government policy shifts, momentum is building toward what leaders and citizens alike call “digital sovereignty”.At a modest market stall in Berlin, run by the charity Topio, volunteers are helping locals purge their smartphones of US-linked software. “Before, it was just privacy geeks. Now, it’s politically aware people who feel exposed,” Topio founder Michael Wirths told&nbsp;Reuters while helping a customer install a Google-free version of Android.The change in sentiment reflects a wider European re-evaluation of reliance on American tech in everything from cloud storage and search engines to messaging apps and social media platforms.Donald Trump’s return to office and his administration’s open criticism of European allies have rattled confidence across the continent. Trump’s retreat from Europe’s security commitments, a newly launched trade war, and incendiary comments by Vice President JD Vance accusing EU governments of censorship have only deepened concerns.A growing cohort of users is now turning to European providers. Berlin-based Ecosia, a green search engine, has seen EU traffic rise 27 per cent year-on-year, while Swiss-based ProtonMail reported an 11.7 per cent jump in use across Europe. Messaging app Signal also recorded a 7 per cent monthly increase in March.<h2>Digital sovereignty gains ground</h2>The term “digital sovereignty” has become central to European tech discourse, encompassing both personal data protection and national security. At the Berlin Summit 2025, experts and policymakers called for coordinated investments in indigenous digital infrastructure to “avoid path dependencies” on US and Chinese platforms.“We are witnessing a blurring of the boundaries between economic and political control,” Maria Farrell, a UK-based internet regulation expert, told&nbsp;Reuters. “People who never questioned it before, like my hairdresser, are now asking which email provider they should switch to.”Regional and national governments are acting. Germany’s federal coalition has committed to expanding open-source software and homegrown cloud solutions. In Schleswig-Holstein, public sector IT is now required to run exclusively on open-source platforms.Berlin even funded Ukraine’s internet access via French firm Eutelsat instead of Elon Musk’s Starlink, a subtle but symbolic pivot away from American platforms.<h2>Big tech still dominates, for now</h2>Despite the shift in sentiment, US tech giants retain overwhelming market dominance. Google attracted 10.3 billion visits from EU countries in February, compared to Ecosia’s 122 million, and Alphabet earned roughly $100 billion from the Europe, West Asia, and Africa region in 2024 alone.Even providers promoting independence rely on the very infrastructure they seek to avoid. Ecosia and France’s Qwant both rely partly on Microsoft’s Bing or Google’s search results. Cloud services remain heavily dependent on US-owned data centres and networking infrastructure.Digital rights groups warn that total separation for now is unrealistic, because currently, from push notifications to content delivery networks, US infrastructure is deeply embedded.&nbsp;<h2>Regulation, not just resistance, is key</h2>While some users seek individual digital alternatives, experts argue real change will require political will and regulatory action. They suggest that the region needs regulation to restore competition and reduce dependence.US companies are responding. Microsoft has announced new products, such as the Microsoft Sovereign Cloud and External Key Management, aimed at supporting European digital independence.“We’ve operated in Europe for over 40 years,” CEO Satya Nadella said in a recent post. “We are committed to unlocking sovereign ways for Europe to run its own digital infrastructure.”Whether these efforts are viewed as solutions or strategic placation, one thing is clear: Europe’s call for sovereignty is no longer limited to policymakers but is resonating across society.

Surge in interest for local alternatives signals rising concerns over data privacy, sovereignty, and political influence.

As political tensions rise between Europe and the United States under Donald Trump’s second presidency, more and more Europeans are seeking to reduce their dependence on American tech giants. From grassroots efforts to government policy shifts, momentum is building toward what leaders and citizens alike call “digital sovereignty”. At a modest market stall in Berlin, run by the charity Topio, volunteers are helping locals purge their smartphones of US-linked software. “Before, it was just privacy geeks. Now, it’s politically aware people who feel exposed,” Topio founder Michael Wirths told Reuters while helping a customer install a Google-free version of Android. The change in sentiment reflects a wider European re-evaluation of reliance on American tech in everything from cloud storage and search engines to messaging apps and social media platforms. Donald Trump’s return to office and his administration’s open criticism of European allies have rattled confidence across the continent. Trump’s retreat from Europe’s security commitments, a newly launched trade war, and incendiary comments by Vice President JD Vance accusing EU governments of censorship have only deepened concerns. A growing cohort of users is now turning to European providers. Berlin-based Ecosia, a green search engine, has seen EU traffic rise 27 per cent year-on-year, while Swiss-based ProtonMail reported an 11.7 per cent jump in use across Europe. Messaging app Signal also recorded a 7 per cent monthly increase in March. Digital sovereignty gains ground The term “digital sovereignty” has become central to European tech discourse, encompassing both personal data protection and national security. At the Berlin Summit 2025, experts and policymakers called for coordinated investments in indigenous digital infrastructure to “avoid path dependencies” on US and Chinese platforms. “We are witnessing a blurring of the boundaries between economic and political control,” Maria Farrell, a UK-based internet regulation expert, told Reuters. “People who never questioned it before, like my hairdresser, are now asking which email provider they should switch to.” Regional and national governments are acting. Germany’s federal coalition has committed to expanding open-source software and homegrown cloud solutions. In Schleswig-Holstein, public sector IT is now required to run exclusively on open-source platforms. Berlin even funded Ukraine’s internet access via French firm Eutelsat instead of Elon Musk’s Starlink, a subtle but symbolic pivot away from American platforms. Big tech still dominates, for now Despite the shift in sentiment, US tech giants retain overwhelming market dominance. Google attracted 10.3 billion visits from EU countries in February, compared to Ecosia’s 122 million, and Alphabet earned roughly $100 billion from the Europe, West Asia, and Africa region in 2024 alone. Even providers promoting independence rely on the very infrastructure they seek to avoid. Ecosia and France’s Qwant both rely partly on Microsoft’s Bing or Google’s search results. Cloud services remain heavily dependent on US-owned data centres and networking infrastructure. Digital rights groups warn that total separation for now is unrealistic, because currently, from push notifications to content delivery networks, US infrastructure is deeply embedded. Regulation, not just resistance, is key While some users seek individual digital alternatives, experts argue real change will require political will and regulatory action. They suggest that the region needs regulation to restore competition and reduce dependence. US companies are responding. Microsoft has announced new products, such as the Microsoft Sovereign Cloud and External Key Management, aimed at supporting European digital independence. “We’ve operated in Europe for over 40 years,” CEO Satya Nadella said in a recent post. “We are committed to unlocking sovereign ways for Europe to run its own digital infrastructure.” Whether these efforts are viewed as solutions or strategic placation, one thing is clear: Europe’s call for sovereignty is no longer limited to policymakers but is resonating across society.

Surge in interest for local alternatives signals rising concerns over data privacy, sovereignty, and political influence.

Europe pushes for digital independence amid growing backlash against US tech firms

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government has unveiled the first major pillar of its long-promised industrial strategy, with a £275 million ($370 million) investment package aimed at addressing chronic skills shortages and preparing the UK workforce for future industries.Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds announced the initiative on June 22, calling it the foundation of a broader 10-year industrial blueprint designed to overhaul the skills system, reduce reliance on foreign labour, and support growth in high-priority sectors such as engineering, defence, AI, and advanced manufacturing.“Our modern industrial strategy will be powered by investing in British people,” Reynolds said. “It will help transform our skills system to end the overreliance on foreign labour and ensure British workers can secure good, well-paid jobs in the industries of tomorrow.”<h2>Focus on skills and technical training</h2>The £275 million ($370 million) investment will fund the creation of new technical excellence colleges, short courses in digital manufacturing and artificial intelligence (AI), and capital upgrades to existing training providers across England. The goal is to address a persistent skills gap in key sectors viewed as central to Britain’s future economic resilience and competitiveness.The package is expected to benefit thousands of learners and create pathways to employment in sectors identified as growth engines under the Labour Party’s “plan for change”. The funding also builds on previous announcements, including a £3 billion ($4 billion) apprenticeship package and a £187 million ($251 million) fund for AI training.Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson described the strategy as an “economic and social reset”, noting that one in seven young people in the UK are currently not in education or employment.<h2>A political counter to reform UK’s rise</h2>The timing of the announcement is seen as a direct response to the growing influence of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party in some parts. With the strategy aimed at revitalising traditional manufacturing heartlands, ministers hope to regain support in so-called red wall constituencies where the Labour Party has faced electoral pressure.Officials say the plan is not only economic but political—part of a broader attempt to challenge Farage’s message of national decline and regain the confidence of working-class voters hit hardest by decades of industrial erosion.<h2>Industrial strategy still evolving</h2>While the £275 million ($370 million) pledge is being positioned as a headline-grabbing first step, it is not a comprehensive funding package. The full strategy, to be published next week, will include new trade and export policies and efforts to strengthen UK supply chains and connectivity.Business groups and unions are expected to push for further measures, particularly in the areas of energy costs and industrial decarbonisation. A June report by Make UK warned that without intervention, energy-intensive sectors could face long-term decline.Finance minister Rachel Reeves has acknowledged these challenges, announcing more than £10 billion ($13.45 billion) in green infrastructure spending and confirming the creation of a British Industrial Strategy Council to oversee delivery and ensure accountability.Despite the modest size of the skills package, the Labour Party hopes the plan marks a shift away from what Reynolds called “decades of managed decline” and signals a new direction for industrial policy in the UK.

The goal of this move is to address a persistent skills gap in key sectors viewed as central to Britain’s future economic resilience and competitiveness.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government has unveiled the first major pillar of its long-promised industrial strategy, with a £275 million ($370 million) investment package aimed at addressing chronic skills shortages and preparing the UK workforce for future industries. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds announced the initiative on June 22, calling it the foundation of a broader 10-year industrial blueprint designed to overhaul the skills system, reduce reliance on foreign labour, and support growth in high-priority sectors such as engineering, defence, AI, and advanced manufacturing. “Our modern industrial strategy will be powered by investing in British people,” Reynolds said. “It will help transform our skills system to end the overreliance on foreign labour and ensure British workers can secure good, well-paid jobs in the industries of tomorrow.” Focus on skills and technical training The £275 million ($370 million) investment will fund the creation of new technical excellence colleges, short courses in digital manufacturing and artificial intelligence (AI), and capital upgrades to existing training providers across England. The goal is to address a persistent skills gap in key sectors viewed as central to Britain’s future economic resilience and competitiveness. The package is expected to benefit thousands of learners and create pathways to employment in sectors identified as growth engines under the Labour Party’s “plan for change”. The funding also builds on previous announcements, including a £3 billion ($4 billion) apprenticeship package and a £187 million ($251 million) fund for AI training. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson described the strategy as an “economic and social reset”, noting that one in seven young people in the UK are currently not in education or employment. A political counter to reform UK’s rise The timing of the announcement is seen as a direct response to the growing influence of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party in some parts. With the strategy aimed at revitalising traditional manufacturing heartlands, ministers hope to regain support in so-called red wall constituencies where the Labour Party has faced electoral pressure. Officials say the plan is not only economic but political—part of a broader attempt to challenge Farage’s message of national decline and regain the confidence of working-class voters hit hardest by decades of industrial erosion. Industrial strategy still evolving While the £275 million ($370 million) pledge is being positioned as a headline-grabbing first step, it is not a comprehensive funding package. The full strategy, to be published next week, will include new trade and export policies and efforts to strengthen UK supply chains and connectivity. Business groups and unions are expected to push for further measures, particularly in the areas of energy costs and industrial decarbonisation. A June report by Make UK warned that without intervention, energy-intensive sectors could face long-term decline. Finance minister Rachel Reeves has acknowledged these challenges, announcing more than £10 billion ($13.45 billion) in green infrastructure spending and confirming the creation of a British Industrial Strategy Council to oversee delivery and ensure accountability. Despite the modest size of the skills package, the Labour Party hopes the plan marks a shift away from what Reynolds called “decades of managed decline” and signals a new direction for industrial policy in the UK.

The goal of this move is to address a persistent skills gap in key sectors viewed as central to Britain’s future economic resilience and competitiveness.

UK unveils $370 million skills investment as cornerstone of 10-year industrial strategy

Global markets are bracing for turbulence after President Donald Trump announced a major US military strike on Iran on June 21, targeting key nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.&nbsp;The attack, announced by Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets.“All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, Fordow,” Trump wrote, calling the mission a “very successful attack” and declaring that “now is the time for peace.”&nbsp;However, investors and analysts believe peace may be a distant hope, with markets instead bracing for fallout from a deepening crisis.<h2>Markets brace for impact</h2>While global markets were closed for the weekend when the attack was announced, analysts warned of a potential knee-jerk reaction once trading resumes. US stock futures, oil benchmarks, and safe-haven assets like gold are all expected to be impacted.“I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher,” Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital, told Reuters. “This is going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil.”Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group told Reuters that while the initial reaction may be sharp, markets may stabilise if Iran pursues a peaceful resolution. “They’ve lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button on a peace deal,” Cox said, referencing the apparent destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.<h2>Oil prices surge amid supply fears</h2>The most immediate market impact is expected to be on oil. Brent crude futures have already surged 18 per cent since June 13, and the recent developments are likely to add further momentum.&nbsp;Analysts at Oxford Economics had recently warned that if the conflict disrupts the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil chokepoint, prices could skyrocket to $130 per barrel. That scenario could drive US inflation close to 6 per cent by year’s end.&nbsp;While Iran exports just 1.6 million barrels of oil per day, the real risk lies in the potential for Tehran to retaliate by blockading the Strait of Hormuz, through which a third of the world’s seaborne oil flows, and even a temporary closure of the strait would send shockwaves through global energy markets.However, analysts also noted that OPEC, particularly Saudi Arabia, has the capacity to cushion the blow. Saudi spare production capacity exceeds 3 million barrels per day, and OPEC has already ramped up supply in anticipation of potential disruptions.<h2>Gold and dollar to benefit from safety bid</h2>In times of geopolitical stress, investors tend to flock to traditional safe havens such as gold and the US dollar. Both assets are expected to benefit from the rising tensions.Gold, which had been trading steadily before the strike, could now see a strong rally as risk aversion climbs. The US dollar, which has stumbled in recent months amid economic uncertainty and interest rate concerns, may see short-term strength as global investors seek shelter.<h2>Equity markets may falter, but history suggests rebound</h2>Although equities are likely to sell off initially, historical patterns suggest the pullback could be short-lived. Data from previous West Asian conflicts, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 Saudi oil facility attacks, shows that markets often recover within months.“The S&amp;P 500 may initially fall, but history shows that it tends to be higher two months after these kinds of events,” analysts from Wedbush Securities told Reuters.Still, with Israel signalling that its operations will continue and Iran warning of “irreparable damage” in response to US military actions, the situation remains highly fluid.But it is not just the equity markets that are expected to take a hit, cryptocurrencies that have been soaring recently are also expected to feel the jitters of the attack.Whether the situation spirals into a wider war or stabilises through diplomacy remains to be seen. Trump’s move follows months of failed negotiations with Tehran and mounting tensions over Iran’s nuclear ambitions. While the president called for peace, the attack may have closed off diplomatic options.As markets reopen, all eyes will be on Iran’s next move and the world’s response.

The attack, announced by Donald Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets.

Global markets are bracing for turbulence after President Donald Trump announced a major US military strike on Iran on June 21, targeting key nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The attack, announced by Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets. “All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, Fordow,” Trump wrote, calling the mission a “very successful attack” and declaring that “now is the time for peace.” However, investors and analysts believe peace may be a distant hope, with markets instead bracing for fallout from a deepening crisis. Markets brace for impact While global markets were closed for the weekend when the attack was announced, analysts warned of a potential knee-jerk reaction once trading resumes. US stock futures, oil benchmarks, and safe-haven assets like gold are all expected to be impacted. “I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher,” Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital, told Reuters. “This is going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil.” Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group told Reuters that while the initial reaction may be sharp, markets may stabilise if Iran pursues a peaceful resolution. “They’ve lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button on a peace deal,” Cox said, referencing the apparent destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Oil prices surge amid supply fears The most immediate market impact is expected to be on oil. Brent crude futures have already surged 18 per cent since June 13, and the recent developments are likely to add further momentum. Analysts at Oxford Economics had recently warned that if the conflict disrupts the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil chokepoint, prices could skyrocket to $130 per barrel. That scenario could drive US inflation close to 6 per cent by year’s end. While Iran exports just 1.6 million barrels of oil per day, the real risk lies in the potential for Tehran to retaliate by blockading the Strait of Hormuz, through which a third of the world’s seaborne oil flows, and even a temporary closure of the strait would send shockwaves through global energy markets. However, analysts also noted that OPEC, particularly Saudi Arabia, has the capacity to cushion the blow. Saudi spare production capacity exceeds 3 million barrels per day, and OPEC has already ramped up supply in anticipation of potential disruptions. Gold and dollar to benefit from safety bid In times of geopolitical stress, investors tend to flock to traditional safe havens such as gold and the US dollar. Both assets are expected to benefit from the rising tensions. Gold, which had been trading steadily before the strike, could now see a strong rally as risk aversion climbs. The US dollar, which has stumbled in recent months amid economic uncertainty and interest rate concerns, may see short-term strength as global investors seek shelter. Equity markets may falter, but history suggests rebound Although equities are likely to sell off initially, historical patterns suggest the pullback could be short-lived. Data from previous West Asian conflicts, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 Saudi oil facility attacks, shows that markets often recover within months. “The S&P 500 may initially fall, but history shows that it tends to be higher two months after these kinds of events,” analysts from Wedbush Securities told Reuters. Still, with Israel signalling that its operations will continue and Iran warning of “irreparable damage” in response to US military actions, the situation remains highly fluid. But it is not just the equity markets that are expected to take a hit, cryptocurrencies that have been soaring recently are also expected to feel the jitters of the attack. Whether the situation spirals into a wider war or stabilises through diplomacy remains to be seen. Trump’s move follows months of failed negotiations with Tehran and mounting tensions over Iran’s nuclear ambitions. While the president called for peace, the attack may have closed off diplomatic options. As markets reopen, all eyes will be on Iran’s next move and the world’s response.

The attack, announced by Donald Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets.

US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to rattle global markets, push investors to safe havens

The United States and the European Union are close to finalising a deal that addresses a raft of long-standing non-tariff trade frictions, including climate regulations, digital market rules, and supply chain concerns.&nbsp;&nbsp;However, key tariff-related issues, including those threatened or imposed under President Donald Trump remain unresolved ahead of a critical July deadline.&nbsp;&nbsp;The developments were first reported by Bloomberg, citing a draft agreement circulated by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR).<h2>What’s in the draft deal?</h2>According to Bloomberg, the draft “agreement on reciprocal trade” outlines tentative compromises on multiple regulatory fronts. The EU has agreed to delay enforcement of its new deforestation regulation for one year, giving global companies more time to comply.&nbsp;&nbsp;The policy requires importers to prove their products are not linked to deforestation, a regulation that has faced resistance from US exporters and European businesses alike. The delay had already been internally decided by the EU last year but now forms part of the broader trade dialogue.&nbsp;The draft also includes provisions to pause enforcement of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) on major American tech platforms while structured negotiations are ongoing. The DMA, one of the EU’s flagship digital competition laws, has already resulted in hefty fines for US firms such as Apple and Meta.&nbsp;&nbsp;The exemption would ease transatlantic tensions over what Washington has called discriminatory enforcement.&nbsp;Another key clause in the draft agreement offers US products a one-year exemption from the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), a climate tariff designed to reflect the carbon intensity of imports. This exemption would give US exporters temporary relief from one of Europe’s most contentious climate policies.&nbsp;The agreement further proposes exemptions for US energy exports from upcoming EU methane rules and suggests that both parties coordinate their policies on shipbuilding and maritime shipping. Specifically, the EU would consider adopting measures similar to US penalties targeting non-market economies, particularly China.&nbsp;&nbsp;The draft text also encourages joint efforts on defence procurement and critical minerals, highlighting a shared commitment to reduce dependency on Chinese supply chains. As reported by Bloomberg, the overall aim is to streamline transatlantic coordination on strategic industries.<h2>Tariff tensions still unresolved</h2>Despite progress on regulatory matters, the draft agreement reportedly omits any resolution of US–EU tariff disputes.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Bloomberg, it does not mention the 20 per cent reciprocal tariff that President Trump threatened and temporarily paused in April nor does it address ongoing duties on EU steel, aluminium, and automotive exports.&nbsp;&nbsp;Likewise, the agreement does not include a response to the EU’s planned retaliatory tariffs, scheduled to take effect on 14 July if no deal is reached.&nbsp;While negotiations continue, it remains unclear whether tariff issues are being handled in a parallel track or have stalled.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer earlier described the EU’s initial proposal which included offers to buy more US goods like liquefied natural gas as a “credible starting point.” However, the most recent draft agreement appears focused solely on non-tariff barriers.&nbsp;European officials have told Bloomberg that any deal perceived as offering one-sided concessions to the US would face public and political resistance.&nbsp;&nbsp;Some have also signalled that maintaining Trump’s baseline 10 per cent tariffs could be a red line, though expectations are growing that these tariffs may not be removed under any circumstances, given Trump’s public defence of tariff revenue as a national economic tool.<h2>Why it matters?</h2>The agreement, if finalised, would mark a significant step toward easing transatlantic trade tensions in non-tariff areas that have burdened US exporters, especially in technology and energy.&nbsp;&nbsp;It also reflects growing alignment on environmental and industrial policy in response to Chinese trade practices.&nbsp;However, the absence of a tariff breakthrough underscores the deep political and economic divide that still defines US–EU trade relations.&nbsp;&nbsp;As quoted by Bloomberg, an EU spokesperson confirmed that both sides remain “fully and deeply engaged in negotiations,” but stopped short of confirming agreement on the full text.&nbsp;&nbsp;With President Trump’s 9 July tariff deadline approaching and the EU’s retaliatory measures due shortly after, the clock is ticking for a comprehensive settlement that addresses both regulatory and tariff concerns.&nbsp;&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

US–EU trade pact nears finalisation with compromises on climate rules, digital markets, and supply chains. But major tariff disputes, including Trump threatened duties, remain unresolved as July deadlines loom.

The United States and the European Union are close to finalising a deal that addresses a raft of long-standing non-tariff trade frictions, including climate regulations, digital market rules, and supply chain concerns. However, key tariff-related issues, including those threatened or imposed under President Donald Trump remain unresolved ahead of a critical July deadline. The developments were first reported by Bloomberg, citing a draft agreement circulated by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR). What’s in the draft deal? According to Bloomberg, the draft “agreement on reciprocal trade” outlines tentative compromises on multiple regulatory fronts. The EU has agreed to delay enforcement of its new deforestation regulation for one year, giving global companies more time to comply. The policy requires importers to prove their products are not linked to deforestation, a regulation that has faced resistance from US exporters and European businesses alike. The delay had already been internally decided by the EU last year but now forms part of the broader trade dialogue. The draft also includes provisions to pause enforcement of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) on major American tech platforms while structured negotiations are ongoing. The DMA, one of the EU’s flagship digital competition laws, has already resulted in hefty fines for US firms such as Apple and Meta. The exemption would ease transatlantic tensions over what Washington has called discriminatory enforcement. Another key clause in the draft agreement offers US products a one-year exemption from the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), a climate tariff designed to reflect the carbon intensity of imports. This exemption would give US exporters temporary relief from one of Europe’s most contentious climate policies. The agreement further proposes exemptions for US energy exports from upcoming EU methane rules and suggests that both parties coordinate their policies on shipbuilding and maritime shipping. Specifically, the EU would consider adopting measures similar to US penalties targeting non-market economies, particularly China. The draft text also encourages joint efforts on defence procurement and critical minerals, highlighting a shared commitment to reduce dependency on Chinese supply chains. As reported by Bloomberg, the overall aim is to streamline transatlantic coordination on strategic industries. Tariff tensions still unresolved Despite progress on regulatory matters, the draft agreement reportedly omits any resolution of US–EU tariff disputes. As per Bloomberg, it does not mention the 20 per cent reciprocal tariff that President Trump threatened and temporarily paused in April nor does it address ongoing duties on EU steel, aluminium, and automotive exports. Likewise, the agreement does not include a response to the EU’s planned retaliatory tariffs, scheduled to take effect on 14 July if no deal is reached. While negotiations continue, it remains unclear whether tariff issues are being handled in a parallel track or have stalled. According to Bloomberg, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer earlier described the EU’s initial proposal which included offers to buy more US goods like liquefied natural gas as a “credible starting point.” However, the most recent draft agreement appears focused solely on non-tariff barriers. European officials have told Bloomberg that any deal perceived as offering one-sided concessions to the US would face public and political resistance. Some have also signalled that maintaining Trump’s baseline 10 per cent tariffs could be a red line, though expectations are growing that these tariffs may not be removed under any circumstances, given Trump’s public defence of tariff revenue as a national economic tool. Why it matters? The agreement, if finalised, would mark a significant step toward easing transatlantic trade tensions in non-tariff areas that have burdened US exporters, especially in technology and energy. It also reflects growing alignment on environmental and industrial policy in response to Chinese trade practices. However, the absence of a tariff breakthrough underscores the deep political and economic divide that still defines US–EU trade relations. As quoted by Bloomberg, an EU spokesperson confirmed that both sides remain “fully and deeply engaged in negotiations,” but stopped short of confirming agreement on the full text. With President Trump’s 9 July tariff deadline approaching and the EU’s retaliatory measures due shortly after, the clock is ticking for a comprehensive settlement that addresses both regulatory and tariff concerns. (With inputs from the agencies)

The US and EU are nearing a trade deal easing key regulatory frictions, but tariff disputes—especially Trump-era duties—remain unresolved ahead of July deadlines, Bloomberg reports.

US–EU near trade deal, but tariff rift remains: Details here

Rising tensions between Israel and Iran have put global investors on high alert, with growing fears that deeper United States involvement could spark a dramatic spike in oil prices and derail hopes of interest rate cuts.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to a detailed report by Reuters, markets are preparing for a range of outcomes, from inflation shocks to supply chain disruptions should the conflict escalate further.&nbsp;So far, oil has been the most affected asset class, while equities and bonds remain largely unmoved, but that calm may not last.<h2>Oil prices soar on supply disruption fears</h2>As per Reuters, Brent crude futures have surged as much as 18 per cent since 10 June, touching a five-month high of $79.04 per barrel on Thursday.&nbsp;&nbsp;US crude prices have also risen by around 10 per cent over the past week, driven by fears of potential strikes on Iranian oil infrastructure or the strategic Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Despite this, the S&amp;P 500 index has shown little overall movement, though analysts caution that markets are underestimating the potential fallout.&nbsp;&nbsp;“If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today’s WTI price and that is where things get negative,” Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth, told Reuters.<h2>Oxford Economics models $130 oil risk</h2>According to Reuters, analysts at Oxford Economics have modelled three potential conflict scenarios, ranging from de-escalation to a complete halt in Iranian oil output, and the worst-case scenario: a closure of the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;In the most severe case, oil prices could surge to $130 per barrel, pushing US inflation to nearly 6 per cent by the end of 2025.&nbsp;&nbsp;“Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about second-round effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the US this year,” Oxford Economics noted in a client memo, as quoted by Reuters.<h2>Market reacts&nbsp;</h2>Despite the oil price shock, equity markets have so far remained stable. Historical data cited by Reuters shows that in past Middle East conflicts — including the 2003 Iraq War and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities — the S&amp;P 500 typically dipped briefly before recovering.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to research from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro, the index slipped 0.3 per cent in the first three weeks after such events but gained 2.3 per cent on average two months later.&nbsp;However, analysts caution that history may not be a reliable guide if the US military enters the conflict. “Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil,” Citigroup analysts wrote in a note, as per Reuters.<h2>What about Dollar?&nbsp;</h2>The US dollar, which has already weakened in 2025 amid concerns over declining US exceptionalism And may initially benefit from&nbsp;safe-haven demand if fighting escalates.&nbsp;&nbsp;But longer-term, it could fall if Washington commits to a prolonged ground conflict, analysts say.&nbsp;“We recall that after the attacks of 9/11 and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened,” Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note to clients, as reported by Reuters.<h2>Why it matters?</h2>The stakes for global markets are rising fast. A major supply shock in oil, particularly involving Iran could derail global disinflation trends, delay interest rate cuts, and hit household spending just as central banks hoped for a soft landing.&nbsp;&nbsp;While stock markets have shown resilience in past crises, this time the convergence of war, energy risk, and policy uncertainty may stretch investor optimism.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, President Donald Trump is expected to make a decision on potential US military action in the next two weeks, a move that could determine whether the Middle East crisis becomes a full-blown economic shock.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Brent crude jumps 18% as Israel–Iran tensions escalate; Oxford Economics warns of $130 oil and surging inflation if the Strait of Hormuz closes. Markets brace for Trump response amid rising economic risk.

Rising tensions between Israel and Iran have put global investors on high alert, with growing fears that deeper United States involvement could spark a dramatic spike in oil prices and derail hopes of interest rate cuts. According to a detailed report by Reuters, markets are preparing for a range of outcomes, from inflation shocks to supply chain disruptions should the conflict escalate further. So far, oil has been the most affected asset class, while equities and bonds remain largely unmoved, but that calm may not last. Oil prices soar on supply disruption fears As per Reuters, Brent crude futures have surged as much as 18 per cent since 10 June, touching a five-month high of $79.04 per barrel on Thursday. US crude prices have also risen by around 10 per cent over the past week, driven by fears of potential strikes on Iranian oil infrastructure or the strategic Strait of Hormuz. Despite this, the S&P 500 index has shown little overall movement, though analysts caution that markets are underestimating the potential fallout. “If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today’s WTI price and that is where things get negative,” Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth, told Reuters. Oxford Economics models $130 oil risk According to Reuters, analysts at Oxford Economics have modelled three potential conflict scenarios, ranging from de-escalation to a complete halt in Iranian oil output, and the worst-case scenario: a closure of the Strait of Hormuz. In the most severe case, oil prices could surge to $130 per barrel, pushing US inflation to nearly 6 per cent by the end of 2025. “Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about second-round effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the US this year,” Oxford Economics noted in a client memo, as quoted by Reuters. Market reacts Despite the oil price shock, equity markets have so far remained stable. Historical data cited by Reuters shows that in past Middle East conflicts — including the 2003 Iraq War and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities — the S&P 500 typically dipped briefly before recovering. According to research from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro, the index slipped 0.3 per cent in the first three weeks after such events but gained 2.3 per cent on average two months later. However, analysts caution that history may not be a reliable guide if the US military enters the conflict. “Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil,” Citigroup analysts wrote in a note, as per Reuters. What about Dollar? The US dollar, which has already weakened in 2025 amid concerns over declining US exceptionalism And may initially benefit from safe-haven demand if fighting escalates. But longer-term, it could fall if Washington commits to a prolonged ground conflict, analysts say. “We recall that after the attacks of 9/11 and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened,” Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note to clients, as reported by Reuters. Why it matters? The stakes for global markets are rising fast. A major supply shock in oil, particularly involving Iran could derail global disinflation trends, delay interest rate cuts, and hit household spending just as central banks hoped for a soft landing. While stock markets have shown resilience in past crises, this time the convergence of war, energy risk, and policy uncertainty may stretch investor optimism. As per Reuters, President Donald Trump is expected to make a decision on potential US military action in the next two weeks, a move that could determine whether the Middle East crisis becomes a full-blown economic shock. (With inputs from the agencies)

Rising Israel–Iran tensions and fears of US involvement are fuelling oil price spikes and threatening to derail global rate-cut hopes, per Reuters.

Middle East tensions rattle oil markets as investors brace for worst-case US involvement

The United States has announced a new round of sanctions targeting entities and individuals linked to Iran’s defence industry and Yemen’s Houthi group.&nbsp;&nbsp;The measures, unveiled by the Trump administration on Friday, are aimed at disrupting Tehran’s access to sensitive defence-related machinery and cracking down on illicit oil trading networks that support the Houthis.&nbsp;According to a statement from the US Treasury Department, the sanctions target eight entities, one individual, and one vessel allegedly involved in supplying components used in Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programmes.&nbsp;&nbsp;A separate action was also taken against four individuals, 12 companies, and two vessels tied to the Houthis’ alleged oil smuggling operations.<h2>Sanctions&nbsp;on Iran’s defence procurement</h2>As per Reuters, the US Treasury accused the sanctioned actors of assisting Iran in acquiring dual-use machinery and components that support the regime’s unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), missile, and asymmetric weapons capabilities.&nbsp;“The United States remains resolved to disrupt any effort by Iran to procure the sensitive, dual-use technology, components, and machinery that underpin the regime’s ballistic missile, unmanned aerial vehicle, and asymmetric weapons programs,” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the statement, as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;As per Reuters, the department identified two Hong Kong-based shipping firms, Unico Shipping Co Ltd and Athena Shipping Co Ltd, among the blacklisted entities. These companies allegedly facilitated the transportation of machinery for Iran’s defence industry.&nbsp;The latest sanctions are part of Washington’s broader effort to limit Iran’s weapons proliferation capacity, which the US argues continues to pose a direct threat to regional stability, particularly in the Middle East.<h2>Action against Houthi oil smuggling network</h2>In a separate statement, the Treasury also announced counterterrorism-related sanctions on what it called a network of individuals and companies engaged in illicit oil trading and shipping operations on behalf of Yemen’s Houthi rebels.&nbsp;As reported by Reuters, the sanctions target four individuals, 12 entities, and two vessels accused of importing oil and other goods to finance the Houthis’ war effort. The US government has previously accused the Iran-aligned group of using oil smuggling to fund its operations, including attacks on commercial shipping routes in the Red Sea.&nbsp;While the Houthis claim to be resisting foreign intervention in Yemen, the US and its allies have blamed the group for repeated missile and drone strikes targeting international shipping and regional adversaries, particularly Saudi Arabia and Israel.<h2>Broader geopolitical context</h2>The new sanctions come at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East, with Iran continuing to back armed proxies across the region.&nbsp;&nbsp;The US has ramped up its enforcement efforts in recent months as part of a wider campaign to contain Iran’s regional influence and limit its ability to finance hostile activities through third-party networks.&nbsp;The sanctions also reflect the Trump administration’s continued policy of economic pressure on Iran, with a particular focus on curbing its missile and drone development programmes.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, Washington’s approach has involved targeting supply chains and logistics firms, especially those operating in Asia and the Gulf to sever Iran’s access to critical manufacturing inputs.<h2>What the sanctions mean?</h2>Entities and individuals named in the sanctions will have their assets frozen within US jurisdiction, and US persons are generally barred from conducting transactions with them.&nbsp;&nbsp;The move is also likely to complicate international shipping and trade for the blacklisted companies, particularly those operating in Hong Kong and the Middle East.&nbsp;The US has reiterated that it will continue to use financial tools to degrade the capabilities of actors that threaten international peace, whether through illicit defence procurement or oil smuggling.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Amid rising regional tensions, the Trump administration targets Iran-linked defence firms and a Houthi oil smuggling network with new sanctions aimed at curbing missile proliferation and illicit financing.

The United States has announced a new round of sanctions targeting entities and individuals linked to Iran’s defence industry and Yemen’s Houthi group. The measures, unveiled by the Trump administration on Friday, are aimed at disrupting Tehran’s access to sensitive defence-related machinery and cracking down on illicit oil trading networks that support the Houthis. According to a statement from the US Treasury Department, the sanctions target eight entities, one individual, and one vessel allegedly involved in supplying components used in Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programmes. A separate action was also taken against four individuals, 12 companies, and two vessels tied to the Houthis’ alleged oil smuggling operations. Sanctions on Iran’s defence procurement As per Reuters, the US Treasury accused the sanctioned actors of assisting Iran in acquiring dual-use machinery and components that support the regime’s unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), missile, and asymmetric weapons capabilities. “The United States remains resolved to disrupt any effort by Iran to procure the sensitive, dual-use technology, components, and machinery that underpin the regime’s ballistic missile, unmanned aerial vehicle, and asymmetric weapons programs,” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the statement, as quoted by Reuters. As per Reuters, the department identified two Hong Kong-based shipping firms, Unico Shipping Co Ltd and Athena Shipping Co Ltd, among the blacklisted entities. These companies allegedly facilitated the transportation of machinery for Iran’s defence industry. The latest sanctions are part of Washington’s broader effort to limit Iran’s weapons proliferation capacity, which the US argues continues to pose a direct threat to regional stability, particularly in the Middle East. Action against Houthi oil smuggling network In a separate statement, the Treasury also announced counterterrorism-related sanctions on what it called a network of individuals and companies engaged in illicit oil trading and shipping operations on behalf of Yemen’s Houthi rebels. As reported by Reuters, the sanctions target four individuals, 12 entities, and two vessels accused of importing oil and other goods to finance the Houthis’ war effort. The US government has previously accused the Iran-aligned group of using oil smuggling to fund its operations, including attacks on commercial shipping routes in the Red Sea. While the Houthis claim to be resisting foreign intervention in Yemen, the US and its allies have blamed the group for repeated missile and drone strikes targeting international shipping and regional adversaries, particularly Saudi Arabia and Israel. Broader geopolitical context The new sanctions come at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East, with Iran continuing to back armed proxies across the region. The US has ramped up its enforcement efforts in recent months as part of a wider campaign to contain Iran’s regional influence and limit its ability to finance hostile activities through third-party networks. The sanctions also reflect the Trump administration’s continued policy of economic pressure on Iran, with a particular focus on curbing its missile and drone development programmes. As per Reuters, Washington’s approach has involved targeting supply chains and logistics firms, especially those operating in Asia and the Gulf to sever Iran’s access to critical manufacturing inputs. What the sanctions mean? Entities and individuals named in the sanctions will have their assets frozen within US jurisdiction, and US persons are generally barred from conducting transactions with them. The move is also likely to complicate international shipping and trade for the blacklisted companies, particularly those operating in Hong Kong and the Middle East. The US has reiterated that it will continue to use financial tools to degrade the capabilities of actors that threaten international peace, whether through illicit defence procurement or oil smuggling. (With inputs from the agencies)

The US has imposed fresh sanctions on Iran’s defence suppliers and Houthi oil smugglers to disrupt missile development and illicit financing in the Middle East.

US imposes fresh sanctions on Iran-linked defence firms and Houthi oil network

India’s Chief Economic Adviser, V. Anantha Nageswaran has said that the country is well-positioned to absorb the recent spike in global crude oil prices without experiencing a significant rise in inflation.&nbsp;&nbsp;In an interview published on Friday, Nageswaran told Bloomberg that India’s economic fundamentals remain strong, and that the oil-driven price surge though a concern does not yet warrant alarm.&nbsp;His comments come as Brent crude prices jumped nearly 20 per cent in the past month, driven by fears of a wider regional conflict following renewed hostilities between Israel and Iran.<h2>Oil prices rise but impact seen as limited</h2>According to Bloomberg, Nageswaran acknowledged that the rise in oil prices is linked to escalating tensions in the Middle East, but said the impact on domestic inflation would remain limited for now. “It is still not something that is going to be significant in terms of impact,” he said.&nbsp;India is the world’s third-largest importer of crude oil, making it highly vulnerable to global energy price shocks.&nbsp;&nbsp;Costlier crude can push up inflation, squeeze household budgets, and threaten the consumption-driven recovery in a country where private spending contributes around 60 per cent of GDP.&nbsp;However, Nageswaran noted that domestic factors such as cooling inflation, sufficient liquidity, and stable interest rates will act as cushions against global headwinds.<h2>Government not pressing the panic button</h2>Nageswaran also emphasised that the situation does not yet call for emergency economic measures. “It is too soon to get overly concerned yet,” he said, adding that any inflationary effect would depend on the duration of high oil prices. “It might have to take more than a quarter or even getting into a couple of quarters before we really have to worry,” he told Bloomberg.&nbsp;India’s retail inflation eased to an 11-month low of 4.75 per cent in May, comfortably within the Reserve Bank of India’s 2–6 per cent target range.&nbsp;&nbsp;Economists suggest that unless oil prices cross $100 per barrel and remain elevated for a prolonged period, the broader inflation outlook may not be significantly affected.<h2>Growth outlook remains intact</h2>The government expects India’s GDP to grow between 6.3 and 6.8 per cent in the current fiscal year ending March 2026. While this is slower than the 8 per cent average seen over the past two years, India is still projected to remain the fastest-growing major economy.&nbsp;Nageswaran said other positive factors, including a favourable monsoon, are expected to boost rural demand and agricultural output. “The underlying price pressures are quite absent, and ample rainfall will also aid India’s economy,” he said, as quoted by Bloomberg.<h2>Why it matters?</h2>India’s ability to withstand external shocks such as oil price volatility is critical at a time when many emerging economies are struggling with inflationary pressures, weak growth, and tight global financial conditions.&nbsp;&nbsp;A muted inflation fallout could give policymakers more space to focus on investment-led growth and infrastructure spending in the run-up to the 2026 Union Budget.&nbsp;Moreover, India’s stable inflation outlook may allow the Reserve Bank of India to hold interest rates steady for longer, avoiding the disruptions seen in other oil-importing nations.&nbsp;&nbsp;As global energy markets remain on edge due to geopolitical uncertainty, India’s cautious optimism as voiced by its top economic adviser sends a reassuring signal to investors.&nbsp;&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Despite surging crude prices amid Middle East tensions, India remains resilient on inflation, with CEA Nageswaran highlighting stable fundamentals and policy space for growth.

India’s Chief Economic Adviser, V. Anantha Nageswaran has said that the country is well-positioned to absorb the recent spike in global crude oil prices without experiencing a significant rise in inflation. In an interview published on Friday, Nageswaran told Bloomberg that India’s economic fundamentals remain strong, and that the oil-driven price surge though a concern does not yet warrant alarm. His comments come as Brent crude prices jumped nearly 20 per cent in the past month, driven by fears of a wider regional conflict following renewed hostilities between Israel and Iran. Oil prices rise but impact seen as limited According to Bloomberg, Nageswaran acknowledged that the rise in oil prices is linked to escalating tensions in the Middle East, but said the impact on domestic inflation would remain limited for now. “It is still not something that is going to be significant in terms of impact,” he said. India is the world’s third-largest importer of crude oil, making it highly vulnerable to global energy price shocks. Costlier crude can push up inflation, squeeze household budgets, and threaten the consumption-driven recovery in a country where private spending contributes around 60 per cent of GDP. However, Nageswaran noted that domestic factors such as cooling inflation, sufficient liquidity, and stable interest rates will act as cushions against global headwinds. Government not pressing the panic button Nageswaran also emphasised that the situation does not yet call for emergency economic measures. “It is too soon to get overly concerned yet,” he said, adding that any inflationary effect would depend on the duration of high oil prices. “It might have to take more than a quarter or even getting into a couple of quarters before we really have to worry,” he told Bloomberg. India’s retail inflation eased to an 11-month low of 4.75 per cent in May, comfortably within the Reserve Bank of India’s 2–6 per cent target range. Economists suggest that unless oil prices cross $100 per barrel and remain elevated for a prolonged period, the broader inflation outlook may not be significantly affected. Growth outlook remains intact The government expects India’s GDP to grow between 6.3 and 6.8 per cent in the current fiscal year ending March 2026. While this is slower than the 8 per cent average seen over the past two years, India is still projected to remain the fastest-growing major economy. Nageswaran said other positive factors, including a favourable monsoon, are expected to boost rural demand and agricultural output. “The underlying price pressures are quite absent, and ample rainfall will also aid India’s economy,” he said, as quoted by Bloomberg. Why it matters? India’s ability to withstand external shocks such as oil price volatility is critical at a time when many emerging economies are struggling with inflationary pressures, weak growth, and tight global financial conditions. A muted inflation fallout could give policymakers more space to focus on investment-led growth and infrastructure spending in the run-up to the 2026 Union Budget. Moreover, India’s stable inflation outlook may allow the Reserve Bank of India to hold interest rates steady for longer, avoiding the disruptions seen in other oil-importing nations. As global energy markets remain on edge due to geopolitical uncertainty, India’s cautious optimism as voiced by its top economic adviser sends a reassuring signal to investors. (With inputs from the agencies)

India's Chief Economic Adviser says rising oil prices won't significantly impact inflation, citing strong domestic fundamentals and stable growth outlook.

India won’t face major inflation shock from oil surge, says top government adviser

US President Donald Trump on Friday expressed confidence that Washington would soon clinch trade agreements with both India and Pakistan.&nbsp;&nbsp;Speaking to reporters upon arrival in New Jersey, Trump’s remarks signal a renewed American push for deeper economic engagement in South Asia, as diplomatic tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours appear to ease.<h2>What did Trump say?</h2>As per Reuters, President Trump stated he was optimistic about reaching trade deals with both India and Pakistan.&nbsp;&nbsp;While addressing reporters in New Jersey, Trump said, “We’re going to make a trade deal with Modi of India,” and suggested that Pakistan would also come to the negotiating table.&nbsp;His comments follow high-level diplomatic engagements involving both countries. On June 18, Trump met Pakistan’s army chief General Asim Munir at the White House, a rare and symbolic move aimed at reducing regional tensions.&nbsp;&nbsp;As quoted by Reuters, Trump later claimed that his intervention helped avert a full-blown crisis between India and Pakistan, remarking, “I stopped the war … I love Pakistan. I think Modi is a fantastic man.”<h2>Talks underway with India and Pakistan</h2>According to Reuters, US and Indian trade negotiators recently concluded four days of talks in New Delhi, making significant progress towards an interim trade agreement.&nbsp;&nbsp;The proposed deal, which may be finalised by the end of June, reportedly includes market access for US agricultural exports such as wheat, dairy and corn, and discussions around reducing Indian tariffs.Meanwhile, Pakistan is also preparing to send a delegation to Washington to begin formal trade discussions.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, Pakistan’s commerce ministry has confirmed that upcoming talks will address US tariffs and potential investment opportunities, particularly in sectors like mining. Islamabad is expected to offer concessions to attract US companies in an effort to diversify its struggling economy.<h2>Why it matters?</h2>The prospect of simultaneous trade deals with India and Pakistan is geopolitically significant. For the US, deeper trade ties with India could boost exports and enhance supply chain resilience, especially as Washington looks to reduce reliance on China.&nbsp;&nbsp;India, already the largest destination for US exports in South Asia, is seen as a critical partner in Washington’s Indo-Pacific strategy.&nbsp;At the same time, opening talks with Pakistan indicates a broader American strategy to stabilise regional dynamics through economic diplomacy.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Reuters, Islamabad hopes trade ties will ease pressure from existing US tariffs and attract new foreign investment, particularly in strategic sectors.&nbsp;&nbsp;For Trump, this dual-track approach strengthens US influence in the region ahead of the 2026 elections and underscores his transactional style of diplomacy.<h2>What’s next?</h2>While Trump’s prediction is optimistic, any future deals will require complex negotiations, compromises on tariffs, and clarity on long-standing issues such as market access and intellectual property.&nbsp;&nbsp;Still, with talks already underway and Trump personally invested in the outcome, the coming months may see major movement on US trade policy in South Asia.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Trump says US is close to trade deals with India and Pakistan, as talks advance on tariffs, market access, and investment amid a push to stabilise regional ties.

US President Donald Trump on Friday expressed confidence that Washington would soon clinch trade agreements with both India and Pakistan. Speaking to reporters upon arrival in New Jersey, Trump’s remarks signal a renewed American push for deeper economic engagement in South Asia, as diplomatic tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours appear to ease. What did Trump say? As per Reuters, President Trump stated he was optimistic about reaching trade deals with both India and Pakistan. While addressing reporters in New Jersey, Trump said, “We’re going to make a trade deal with Modi of India,” and suggested that Pakistan would also come to the negotiating table. His comments follow high-level diplomatic engagements involving both countries. On June 18, Trump met Pakistan’s army chief General Asim Munir at the White House, a rare and symbolic move aimed at reducing regional tensions. As quoted by Reuters, Trump later claimed that his intervention helped avert a full-blown crisis between India and Pakistan, remarking, “I stopped the war … I love Pakistan. I think Modi is a fantastic man.” Talks underway with India and Pakistan According to Reuters, US and Indian trade negotiators recently concluded four days of talks in New Delhi, making significant progress towards an interim trade agreement. The proposed deal, which may be finalised by the end of June, reportedly includes market access for US agricultural exports such as wheat, dairy and corn, and discussions around reducing Indian tariffs. Meanwhile, Pakistan is also preparing to send a delegation to Washington to begin formal trade discussions. As per Reuters, Pakistan’s commerce ministry has confirmed that upcoming talks will address US tariffs and potential investment opportunities, particularly in sectors like mining. Islamabad is expected to offer concessions to attract US companies in an effort to diversify its struggling economy. Why it matters? The prospect of simultaneous trade deals with India and Pakistan is geopolitically significant. For the US, deeper trade ties with India could boost exports and enhance supply chain resilience, especially as Washington looks to reduce reliance on China. India, already the largest destination for US exports in South Asia, is seen as a critical partner in Washington’s Indo-Pacific strategy. At the same time, opening talks with Pakistan indicates a broader American strategy to stabilise regional dynamics through economic diplomacy. According to Reuters, Islamabad hopes trade ties will ease pressure from existing US tariffs and attract new foreign investment, particularly in strategic sectors. For Trump, this dual-track approach strengthens US influence in the region ahead of the 2026 elections and underscores his transactional style of diplomacy. What’s next? While Trump’s prediction is optimistic, any future deals will require complex negotiations, compromises on tariffs, and clarity on long-standing issues such as market access and intellectual property. Still, with talks already underway and Trump personally invested in the outcome, the coming months may see major movement on US trade policy in South Asia. (With inputs from the agencies)

President Trump signals imminent trade deals with India and Pakistan, leveraging diplomacy to boost US ties and economic influence in South Asia.

Trump eyes trade pacts with India and Pakistan amid renewed diplomacy

Retail giant Walmart has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a civil lawsuit filed by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which accused the company of failing to prevent scammers from using its money transfer services to defraud consumers.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, the case underscores growing scrutiny over how large retailers manage financial services, especially amid rising incidents of fraud linked to telemarketing and wire transfers.&nbsp;The settlement was filed on Friday in a federal court in Chicago and still requires judicial approval.<h2>What is the case about?</h2>As per a 2022 complaint filed by the FTC, Walmart allegedly turned a blind eye while fraudsters used its in-store money transfer services, &nbsp;including partnerships with MoneyGram and Western Union — to siphon off hundreds of millions of dollars from consumers.&nbsp;According to Reuters, these scams typically included impersonation of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) officials, fake lottery or sweepstakes claims, and fraudulent emergency requests from people posing as relatives.&nbsp;Once the funds were sent, they were almost impossible to trace or recover, a tactic that made electronic money transfers the method of choice for fraudsters.<h2>What did the court say?</h2>According to Reuters, the proposed $10 million settlement was submitted to US District Judge Manish Shah, who must now approve the agreement.&nbsp;&nbsp;Judge Shah had earlier dismissed part of the FTC’s claims in July 2023, but allowed the key allegations to proceed. Walmart appealed that decision, and this settlement would effectively end the appeal.&nbsp;Under the agreement, Walmart has also committed to enhanced oversight measures. The company will be prohibited from processing transfers it suspects are fraudulent and from working with sellers or telemarketers it believes may be using its services to commit fraud.<h2>What did the FTC say?</h2>“Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it’s sent, it’s gone for good,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;He added that companies offering these services must train employees and build systems that can flag suspicious activity and stop transactions before it’s too late.<h2>What is Walmart’s response?</h2>As per Reuters, Walmart has not admitted or denied wrongdoing under the terms of the settlement. The company also did not respond to Reuters’ request for comment following the court filing.&nbsp;In past statements, Walmart has maintained that it has invested significantly in fraud prevention and&nbsp;staff training to protect consumers.<h2>Have there been similar cases before?</h2>Yes. The Walmart case reportedly follows a pattern of enforcement by US regulators against firms that allegedly failed to protect consumers from money transfer fraud.&nbsp;As reported by Reuters, Western Union agreed to a $586 million settlement in 2017 over similar allegations, while MoneyGram paid $125 million in 2021 for violating anti-fraud commitments. In each case, regulators said the companies failed to act on red flags that could have prevented widespread consumer losses.&nbsp;The FTC said that in Walmart’s case, the company also failed to act on internal warnings and allowed repeated suspicious transactions to be processed at its stores.<h2>What happens next?</h2>If approved by the court, the $10 million will be used for consumer redress or other remedies determined by the judge.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, the settlement also sends a strong signal to other major retailers and financial intermediaries: they will be held accountable if they fail to prevent fraud, especially as in-store financial services become more accessible and vulnerable.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;&nbsp;

Walmart settles FTC case over money transfer fraud for $10 million, as regulators warn retailers to boost oversight and protect consumers from scams.

Retail giant Walmart has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a civil lawsuit filed by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which accused the company of failing to prevent scammers from using its money transfer services to defraud consumers. As per Reuters, the case underscores growing scrutiny over how large retailers manage financial services, especially amid rising incidents of fraud linked to telemarketing and wire transfers. The settlement was filed on Friday in a federal court in Chicago and still requires judicial approval. What is the case about? As per a 2022 complaint filed by the FTC, Walmart allegedly turned a blind eye while fraudsters used its in-store money transfer services, including partnerships with MoneyGram and Western Union — to siphon off hundreds of millions of dollars from consumers. According to Reuters, these scams typically included impersonation of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) officials, fake lottery or sweepstakes claims, and fraudulent emergency requests from people posing as relatives. Once the funds were sent, they were almost impossible to trace or recover, a tactic that made electronic money transfers the method of choice for fraudsters. What did the court say? According to Reuters, the proposed $10 million settlement was submitted to US District Judge Manish Shah, who must now approve the agreement. Judge Shah had earlier dismissed part of the FTC’s claims in July 2023, but allowed the key allegations to proceed. Walmart appealed that decision, and this settlement would effectively end the appeal. Under the agreement, Walmart has also committed to enhanced oversight measures. The company will be prohibited from processing transfers it suspects are fraudulent and from working with sellers or telemarketers it believes may be using its services to commit fraud. What did the FTC say? “Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it’s sent, it’s gone for good,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, as quoted by Reuters. He added that companies offering these services must train employees and build systems that can flag suspicious activity and stop transactions before it’s too late. What is Walmart’s response? As per Reuters, Walmart has not admitted or denied wrongdoing under the terms of the settlement. The company also did not respond to Reuters’ request for comment following the court filing. In past statements, Walmart has maintained that it has invested significantly in fraud prevention and staff training to protect consumers. Have there been similar cases before? Yes. The Walmart case reportedly follows a pattern of enforcement by US regulators against firms that allegedly failed to protect consumers from money transfer fraud. As reported by Reuters, Western Union agreed to a $586 million settlement in 2017 over similar allegations, while MoneyGram paid $125 million in 2021 for violating anti-fraud commitments. In each case, regulators said the companies failed to act on red flags that could have prevented widespread consumer losses. The FTC said that in Walmart’s case, the company also failed to act on internal warnings and allowed repeated suspicious transactions to be processed at its stores. What happens next? If approved by the court, the $10 million will be used for consumer redress or other remedies determined by the judge. As per Reuters, the settlement also sends a strong signal to other major retailers and financial intermediaries: they will be held accountable if they fail to prevent fraud, especially as in-store financial services become more accessible and vulnerable. (With inputs from the agencies)

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle an FTC lawsuit alleging it failed to stop scammers from exploiting its money transfer services.&nbsp;

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle US fraud case over money transfer scams

The US Federal Reserve is facing a growing internal split: should it guard against persistent inflation risks or respond to signs of a slowing labour market?&nbsp;&nbsp;This debate, now playing out against the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s renewed tariff agenda and political pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell, is deepening uncertainty about the central bank’s next move.<h2>Policy divide emerges after rate pause</h2>Following its decision this week to hold interest rates steady between 4.25 per cent and 4.5 per cent, Federal Reserve policymakers have begun to publicly express divergent views on the path forward.&nbsp;Fed Governor Christopher Waller said on Friday he favours a rate cut as early as July, citing cooling inflation and signs of labour market softening, including rising unemployment among new college graduates.&nbsp;&nbsp;Speaking to CNBC, Waller stated, “The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good… We could do this as early as July.”&nbsp;As per Reuters, Waller also downplayed the inflationary impact of Trump’s new tariffs, arguing they were not significant enough to delay easing. “Any tariff inflation… I don’t think is going to be that big and we should just look through it in terms of setting policy,” he added.<h2>Barkin warns against premature cuts</h2>However, Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin offered a more cautious view in an interview with Reuters. With inflation still above the Fed’s 2 per cent target, and tariff policy still evolving, Barkin argued that the central bank could afford to wait.&nbsp;“Nothing is burning on either side such that it suggests there’s a rush to act,” Barkin said. “I’m not in a mood to ignore a spike in inflation were it to come… Core inflation is still over target. Being modestly restrictive is a good way to address that.”&nbsp;This divergence reflects what Barkin called a “bimodal” split within the Fed. According to Reuters, seven policymakers expect no rate cuts this year, while eight anticipate two cuts, likely in September and December in line with investor forecasts.<h2>Trump adds political heat, again</h2>President Trump has added fuel to the debate, ramping up pressure on Powell to cut rates. In a Truth Social post on Friday, Trump wrote: “Maybe, just maybe, I’ll have to change my mind about firing him?” — a fresh threat to remove the Fed Chair he appointed.&nbsp;As per Reuters, Trump continues to criticise Powell for not cutting rates fast enough, blaming the central bank for hampering economic growth. Despite his repeated threats, Trump has also frequently reversed course. Just days earlier, on June 12, he told reporters, “I’m not going to fire him.”&nbsp;Powell’s term runs until May 2026, and while a Supreme Court ruling in May reaffirmed the Fed’s unique structure and protections from presidential interference, speculation is mounting about who Trump might nominate as a successor.<h2>Tariffs complicate the inflation picture</h2>Meanwhile, the Fed’s latest monetary policy report, released on Friday, acknowledged that recent import tariffs have already pushed up goods inflation. Though overall inflation remains below expectations, the report suggests that trade policy is beginning to feed into price pressures.&nbsp;The Trump administration continues to defend the tariff hikes, claiming they will benefit the US economy in the long term. However, the Fed’s internal modelling as reported by Reuters, suggests the cost is likely to fall on consumers.&nbsp;Fed projections this week indicated slower growth, higher unemployment, and stickier inflation by year-end, all factors that will make future rate decisions more complex.<h2>Powell to face Congress amid rising tensions</h2>Fed Chair Powell is expected to face tough questions from lawmakers when he testifies before Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday as part of the Fed’s regular semiannual hearings.&nbsp;&nbsp;As quoted by Reuters, Powell on Wednesday said the Fed is prepared to wait for more clarity: “We are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.”&nbsp;But with political pressure mounting and the Fed split between inflation hawks and labour market doves, all eyes are now on July and whether the data or the politics win out.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

As Trump pushes for lower rates and inflation risks persist, Fed officials clash over July rate cut prospects, exposing deep policy divisions ahead of Powell’s testimony.

The US Federal Reserve is facing a growing internal split: should it guard against persistent inflation risks or respond to signs of a slowing labour market? This debate, now playing out against the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s renewed tariff agenda and political pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell, is deepening uncertainty about the central bank’s next move. Policy divide emerges after rate pause Following its decision this week to hold interest rates steady between 4.25 per cent and 4.5 per cent, Federal Reserve policymakers have begun to publicly express divergent views on the path forward. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said on Friday he favours a rate cut as early as July, citing cooling inflation and signs of labour market softening, including rising unemployment among new college graduates. Speaking to CNBC, Waller stated, “The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good… We could do this as early as July.” As per Reuters, Waller also downplayed the inflationary impact of Trump’s new tariffs, arguing they were not significant enough to delay easing. “Any tariff inflation… I don’t think is going to be that big and we should just look through it in terms of setting policy,” he added. Barkin warns against premature cuts However, Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin offered a more cautious view in an interview with Reuters. With inflation still above the Fed’s 2 per cent target, and tariff policy still evolving, Barkin argued that the central bank could afford to wait. “Nothing is burning on either side such that it suggests there’s a rush to act,” Barkin said. “I’m not in a mood to ignore a spike in inflation were it to come… Core inflation is still over target. Being modestly restrictive is a good way to address that.” This divergence reflects what Barkin called a “bimodal” split within the Fed. According to Reuters, seven policymakers expect no rate cuts this year, while eight anticipate two cuts, likely in September and December in line with investor forecasts. Trump adds political heat, again President Trump has added fuel to the debate, ramping up pressure on Powell to cut rates. In a Truth Social post on Friday, Trump wrote: “Maybe, just maybe, I’ll have to change my mind about firing him?” — a fresh threat to remove the Fed Chair he appointed. As per Reuters, Trump continues to criticise Powell for not cutting rates fast enough, blaming the central bank for hampering economic growth. Despite his repeated threats, Trump has also frequently reversed course. Just days earlier, on June 12, he told reporters, “I’m not going to fire him.” Powell’s term runs until May 2026, and while a Supreme Court ruling in May reaffirmed the Fed’s unique structure and protections from presidential interference, speculation is mounting about who Trump might nominate as a successor. Tariffs complicate the inflation picture Meanwhile, the Fed’s latest monetary policy report, released on Friday, acknowledged that recent import tariffs have already pushed up goods inflation. Though overall inflation remains below expectations, the report suggests that trade policy is beginning to feed into price pressures. The Trump administration continues to defend the tariff hikes, claiming they will benefit the US economy in the long term. However, the Fed’s internal modelling as reported by Reuters, suggests the cost is likely to fall on consumers. Fed projections this week indicated slower growth, higher unemployment, and stickier inflation by year-end, all factors that will make future rate decisions more complex. Powell to face Congress amid rising tensions Fed Chair Powell is expected to face tough questions from lawmakers when he testifies before Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday as part of the Fed’s regular semiannual hearings. As quoted by Reuters, Powell on Wednesday said the Fed is prepared to wait for more clarity: “We are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.” But with political pressure mounting and the Fed split between inflation hawks and labour market doves, all eyes are now on July and whether the data or the politics win out. (With inputs from the agencies)

A growing split at the US Fed pits inflation hawks against labour-focused doves, as Trump’s tariff agenda and political pressure cloud the outlook for rate cuts.&nbsp;

Fed divided on rate cuts as Trump pressure, tariff inflation complicate outlook