Harley-Davidson triumphs in 'Right to Repair' lawsuit

In a significant victory for the iconic American motorcycle manufacturer, a federal judge in Green Bay, Wisconsin, has dismissed a proposed class-action lawsuit against Harley-Davidson. The lawsuit, filed by a group of 15 individual consumers who purchased Harley-Davidson motorcycles between 2016 and 2022, claimed that the company imposed unlawful restrictions that drove up the cost of repairs.

At the heart of the dispute was Harley-Davidson's warranty policy, which stated that the use of unauthorised parts "may void" the warranty. The plaintiffs argued that this provision constituted an illegal tying arrangement, forcing customers to use only the company's branded parts through authorised dealers, thus violating antitrust and warranty laws.

However, U.S. District Judge William Griesbach disagreed with the plaintiffs' interpretation of the warranty provision. In his ruling, the judge sided with Harley-Davidson, stating that the provision did not explicitly state that the company "will" void the warranty if certain parts are used, but rather that it "may" do so.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

Furthermore, Judge Griesbach concluded that Harley-Davidson had not engaged in an illegal tying practice by requiring customers to purchase branded parts as a condition for buying their motorcycles. The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that they were "precluded from buying a motorcycle without agreeing to purchase Harley-Davidson parts," according to the judge's written opinion.

While the ruling is a setback for the plaintiffs, Judge Griesbach has given them 30 days to file an amended lawsuit, leaving the door open for further legal action.

This case has drawn attention to the broader "right to repair" movement, which seeks to ensure that consumers have the freedom to repair their products using third-party services and parts without voiding warranties. In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) made "right to repair" a priority and vowed to increase enforcement actions against illegal repair restrictions.

Interestingly, in 2022, Harley-Davidson agreed to resolve an FTC case accusing the company of illegally curtailing buyers' repair rights. As part of the settlement, Harley-Davidson stated that it would not void warranties for customers who had used authorised service centres or third-party parts. However, the company did not admit liability in the settlement, and it maintained that the resolution of the FTC case had no bearing on the private civil lawsuit dismissed by Judge Griesbach.

As the "right to repair" movement continues to gain momentum, this case highlights the ongoing legal battles between manufacturers and consumer advocates over the ability to repair and maintain products without facing potential warranty implications or restrictions.