Tensions between the United States and Iran have intensified amid stalled nuclear negotiations and a significant US military buildup in the Middle East. US officials say planning for potential strikes against Iran — including options that could target key Iranian leaders or leadership structures — is at an advanced stage if diplomacy fails. Tehran has warned it will respond decisively to any attack, heightening fears of a broader regional confrontation.


US-Iran Tensions: Is US Planning to Target Iran's Top Leaders?

As tensions simmer between Washington and Tehran, US President Donald Trump is weighing options that go far beyond diplomacy, suggest reports. The POTUS is reportedly considering "taking out" the nation's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Imam Ali Khamenei, his son and the mullahs. Here's what we know.<h2>Trump to order Ayatollah's assassination?</h2>According to an Axios report citing multiple sources, Trump is considering multiple scenarios, including one that involves the assassination of Iran's supreme leader and his potential successor, his son, Mojtaba.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-claims-breakthrough-in-geneva-talks-vance-says-tehran-ignoring-trump-s-red-lines-1771375814136">Iran claims breakthrough in Geneva talks, Vance says Tehran ignoring Trump's 'red lines'</a>"They have something for every scenario. One scenario takes out the ayatollah and his son and the mullahs," a senior Trump advisor told the publication. However, the adviser insisted that Trump has not decided yet, "What the president chooses no one knows. I don't think he knows."Another senior official on the Trump administration confirmed that the plan to kill Khamenei and his son Mojtaba was presented to Trump weeks ago.<h2>Trump ‘keeping his options open’</h2>"Trump is keeping his options open. He could decide on an attack at any moment," including direct action against the country’s top leadership, said a third person in the Trump administration.<h2>Military pressure builds</h2>The reports surfaced as Trump on Thursday (Feb 19) acknowledged he is considering a limited strike on Iran, if the nation did not strike a deal with the US within 10-15 days. When asked directly by a reporter, he replied, "The most I can say, I am considering it."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-ahead-of-us-iran-talks-in-geneva-warns-iran-of-consequences-if-nuclear-deal-fails-what-bout-uss-abraham-lincoln-1771295379775">Trump, ahead of US-Iran talks in Geneva, warns Tehran of 'consequences' if nuclear deal fails</a>In recent weeks, the US has ramped up its military presence in the Middle East. After deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier group earlier this year, Washington ordered a second aircraft carrier, the Gerald Ford, to head to the region. The move is widely seen as leverage, aimed at pushing Tehran to curb its nuclear programme.Trump has warned that "bad things" would happen if Iran does not reach a deal before his deadline expires.&nbsp;<h2>Talks continue</h2>The latest escalation comes even as negotiations inch forward. Following talks in Geneva, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said a draft proposal could be ready within days and would be handed to US envoy Steve Witkoff after final approval in Tehran.Araghchi pushed back on claims that Washington demanded zero uranium enrichment. "We have not offered any suspension, and the US side has not asked for zero enrichment," he said in an interview to US TV network MS NOW. The focus, he insisted, is ensuring Iran’s nuclear programme "is peaceful and would remain peaceful forever". &nbsp;

As tensions rise between Washington and Tehran, reports say President Donald Trump is weighing options that go beyond diplomacy, including a scenario involving the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his son Mojtaba. Here's all we know.

As tensions simmer between Washington and Tehran, US President Donald Trump is weighing options that go far beyond diplomacy, suggest reports. The POTUS is reportedly considering "taking out" the nation's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Imam Ali Khamenei, his son and the mullahs. Here's what we know. Trump to order Ayatollah's assassination? According to an Axios report citing multiple sources, Trump is considering multiple scenarios, including one that involves the assassination of Iran's supreme leader and his potential successor, his son, Mojtaba. Also read | Iran claims breakthrough in Geneva talks, Vance says Tehran ignoring Trump's 'red lines' "They have something for every scenario. One scenario takes out the ayatollah and his son and the mullahs," a senior Trump advisor told the publication. However, the adviser insisted that Trump has not decided yet, "What the president chooses no one knows. I don't think he knows." Another senior official on the Trump administration confirmed that the plan to kill Khamenei and his son Mojtaba was presented to Trump weeks ago. Trump ‘keeping his options open’ "Trump is keeping his options open. He could decide on an attack at any moment," including direct action against the country’s top leadership, said a third person in the Trump administration. Military pressure builds The reports surfaced as Trump on Thursday (Feb 19) acknowledged he is considering a limited strike on Iran, if the nation did not strike a deal with the US within 10-15 days. When asked directly by a reporter, he replied, "The most I can say, I am considering it." Also read | Trump, ahead of US-Iran talks in Geneva, warns Tehran of 'consequences' if nuclear deal fails In recent weeks, the US has ramped up its military presence in the Middle East. After deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier group earlier this year, Washington ordered a second aircraft carrier, the Gerald Ford, to head to the region. The move is widely seen as leverage, aimed at pushing Tehran to curb its nuclear programme. Trump has warned that "bad things" would happen if Iran does not reach a deal before his deadline expires. Talks continue The latest escalation comes even as negotiations inch forward. Following talks in Geneva, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said a draft proposal could be ready within days and would be handed to US envoy Steve Witkoff after final approval in Tehran. Araghchi pushed back on claims that Washington demanded zero uranium enrichment. "We have not offered any suspension, and the US side has not asked for zero enrichment," he said in an interview to US TV network MS NOW. The focus, he insisted, is ensuring Iran’s nuclear programme "is peaceful and would remain peaceful forever".

As tensions rise between Washington and Tehran, reports say President Donald Trump is weighing options that go beyond diplomacy, including a scenario involving the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his son Mojtaba. Here's all we know.

Did Trump order Iran supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei's assassination? Here's what new report suggests

Tensions between the United States and Iran have escalated after US President Donald Trump confirmed he is considering possible “limited action” against Tehran amid stalled nuclear negotiations and rising regional pressure. Washington’s warning comes alongside increased military buildup and diplomatic efforts, as the US seeks to push Iran toward a new nuclear deal while cautioning of serious consequences if talks fail.


US-Iran Tensions: US President Confirms Possible 'Limited Action' Against Tehran 

Newly released documents show that a 23-year-old US citizen was shot and killed last year by a federal immigration agent during a late-night traffic encounter in Texas. Shockingly, the death was never publicly disclosed by the United States Attorney General Pam Bondi-led Department of Homeland Security. The killing of the 23-year-old American is the sixth such killing at the hands of US President Donald Trump deployed federal agents. Here's what we know.<h2>ICE victim identified</h2>According to an Associated Press report, US citizen Ruben Ray Martinez died on March 15, 2025, on South Padre Island. His death, now detailed in internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) records, appears to be the first of at least six fatal shootings involving federal officers since the start of President Donald Trump's renewed immigration crackdown.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-considering-assassinating-khamenei-and-his-son-reports-say-potus-keeping-options-open-against-iran-leadership-1771656697406">Trump considering assassinating Khamenei? Reports claim POTUS 'keeping options open' against Iran</a>On Friday, DHS said the shooting occurred after Martinez "intentionally ran over" a Homeland Security Investigations special agent. Another agent, the department said, fired "defensive shots to protect himself, his fellow agents, and the general public".<h2>What happened? Here's what the internal report says</h2>The documents, which were obtained by American Oversight through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, include a heavily redacted, two-page ICE incident report.According to that report, HSI officers were assisting local police shortly after midnight, redirecting traffic at a busy intersection following a crash with multiple injuries. A blue Ford with two men inside approached. Officers ordered the driver to stop. The report does not explain why.The vehicle initially failed to respond but eventually stopped. Agents surrounded it and told the occupants to exit. The driver then "accelerated forward", which allegedly caused an HSI agent to "wound up on the hood of the vehicle," the report states.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/what-happens-to-india-s-18-tariff-after-scotus-scraps-trump-reciprocal-duties-here-s-what-the-potus-said-nothing-happens-1771648834475">Will India still pay 18% tariffs after SCOTUS verdict? Here's what Trump said</a>A supervisory agent standing beside the vehicle fired multiple shots through the open driver's side window. The car came to a halt.Paramedics already at the scene treated Martinez before he was transported to a hospital in Brownsville, where he was pronounced dead. The passenger, also a US citizen, was taken into custody. The injured agent was treated for a knee injury and released.<h2>Victim's family reveals disturbing details</h2>Martinez’s mother, Rachel Reyes, said her son had travelled from San Antonio to celebrate his birthday weekend. She said that initially, the fact that a federal agent, not local police, killed her son was hidden from her. Reyes also said a Texas Rangers investigator told her there were videos of the shooting that contradicted the federal account. The state investigation, she was told, was completed in October and may be presented to a grand jury for potential criminal charges.The Texas Department of Public Safety said Friday the case remains active. DHS, however, has yet to say anything about why no public notice was issued in the 11 months since the shooting.

New ICE records reveal 23-year-old US citizen Ruben Ray Martinez was shot and killed by a federal agent in Texas in March 2025, but the incident was never publicly disclosed. DHS says he ran over an agent, while his family claims key details are being hidden. All you need to know.

Newly released documents show that a 23-year-old US citizen was shot and killed last year by a federal immigration agent during a late-night traffic encounter in Texas. Shockingly, the death was never publicly disclosed by the United States Attorney General Pam Bondi-led Department of Homeland Security. The killing of the 23-year-old American is the sixth such killing at the hands of US President Donald Trump deployed federal agents. Here's what we know. ICE victim identified According to an Associated Press report, US citizen Ruben Ray Martinez died on March 15, 2025, on South Padre Island. His death, now detailed in internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) records, appears to be the first of at least six fatal shootings involving federal officers since the start of President Donald Trump's renewed immigration crackdown. Also read | Trump considering assassinating Khamenei? Reports claim POTUS 'keeping options open' against Iran On Friday, DHS said the shooting occurred after Martinez "intentionally ran over" a Homeland Security Investigations special agent. Another agent, the department said, fired "defensive shots to protect himself, his fellow agents, and the general public". What happened? Here's what the internal report says The documents, which were obtained by American Oversight through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, include a heavily redacted, two-page ICE incident report. According to that report, HSI officers were assisting local police shortly after midnight, redirecting traffic at a busy intersection following a crash with multiple injuries. A blue Ford with two men inside approached. Officers ordered the driver to stop. The report does not explain why. The vehicle initially failed to respond but eventually stopped. Agents surrounded it and told the occupants to exit. The driver then "accelerated forward", which allegedly caused an HSI agent to "wound up on the hood of the vehicle," the report states. Also read | Will India still pay 18% tariffs after SCOTUS verdict? Here's what Trump said A supervisory agent standing beside the vehicle fired multiple shots through the open driver's side window. The car came to a halt. Paramedics already at the scene treated Martinez before he was transported to a hospital in Brownsville, where he was pronounced dead. The passenger, also a US citizen, was taken into custody. The injured agent was treated for a knee injury and released. Victim's family reveals disturbing details Martinez’s mother, Rachel Reyes, said her son had travelled from San Antonio to celebrate his birthday weekend. She said that initially, the fact that a federal agent, not local police, killed her son was hidden from her. Reyes also said a Texas Rangers investigator told her there were videos of the shooting that contradicted the federal account. The state investigation, she was told, was completed in October and may be presented to a grand jury for potential criminal charges. The Texas Department of Public Safety said Friday the case remains active. DHS, however, has yet to say anything about why no public notice was issued in the 11 months since the shooting.

New ICE records reveal 23-year-old US citizen Ruben Ray Martinez was shot and killed by a federal agent in Texas in March 2025, but the incident was never publicly disclosed. DHS says he ran over an agent, while his family claims key details are being hidden. All you need to know.

Before Renee Good and Alex Pretti, Trump's ICE killed another American and never disclosed it, records reveal

In a major setback to president Donald Trump’s trade agenda, the US Supreme court struck down several of his sweeping import tariffs in a 6-3 ruling. The court held that the international emergency economic powers act, or IEEPA, does not authorise the president to impose broad global tariffs.


President’s IEEPA Authority Rejected by Supreme Court

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Feb 20) said India will continue to face 18 per cent tariffs, even after the Supreme Court struck down sweeping reciprocal tariffs. The remarks came days after the court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that Trump's sweeping duties on imports from nearly all trading partners violated federal law. The judges held that he lacked the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose such wide-ranging tariffs.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-neal-katyal-all-about-the-indian-origin-lawyer-who-led-legal-challenge-against-trump-tariffs-at-scotus-1771641242108">Who is Neal Katyal? Indian-origin lawyer behind SCOTUS ruling on Trump tariffs</a><h2>What happens to 18% India tariffs?</h2>Trump was blunt when asked about the impact on the India deal. "Nothing changes," he said in response to ANI. The trade arrangement, he added, remains intact and is expected to be signed by the end of March.Under the interim US-India trade deal framework announced earlier this month, Washington reduced proposed tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from an earlier 50 per cent. In return, New Delhi agreed to eliminate tariffs on US goods."Nothing changes. They'll be paying tariffs, and we will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what used to be," Trump said, calling it a "fair deal". He also described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as "a great gentleman a great man" and said the agreement marked a reversal of past trade terms."In terms of the US, He was ripping us off. So we made a deal with India. A fair deal now. We are not paying tariffs to them, and they are. We did a little flip," said Trump.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/donald-trump-suffers-first-major-blow-to-his-economic-and-diplomatic-policy-opinion-1771637528141">Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy</a><h2>What the US-India trade deal covers</h2>India has agreed to cut or remove duties on US industrial goods and a range of farm products. These include dried distillers’ grains, red sorghum, tree nuts, fruits, soybean oil, wine and spirits.The US, on its part, will apply the 18 per cent tariff to Indian exports such as textiles, leather goods, footwear, chemicals, plastics, home decor and certain machinery.Notably, while the two nations announced the framework, the deal is yet to be signed. Officials from both countries are set to meet in the US on February 23 for three days to finalise the legal text. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently said the agreement is likely to take effect in April.&nbsp;

Will India still face 18 per cent US tariffs even after the Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping reciprocal duties? President Trump says “nothing changes” under the interim trade deal.

Scroll down to find out what happens next.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Feb 20) said India will continue to face 18 per cent tariffs, even after the Supreme Court struck down sweeping reciprocal tariffs. The remarks came days after the court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that Trump's sweeping duties on imports from nearly all trading partners violated federal law. The judges held that he lacked the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose such wide-ranging tariffs. Also read | Who is Neal Katyal? Indian-origin lawyer behind SCOTUS ruling on Trump tariffs What happens to 18% India tariffs? Trump was blunt when asked about the impact on the India deal. "Nothing changes," he said in response to ANI. The trade arrangement, he added, remains intact and is expected to be signed by the end of March. Under the interim US-India trade deal framework announced earlier this month, Washington reduced proposed tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from an earlier 50 per cent. In return, New Delhi agreed to eliminate tariffs on US goods. "Nothing changes. They'll be paying tariffs, and we will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what used to be," Trump said, calling it a "fair deal". He also described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as "a great gentleman a great man" and said the agreement marked a reversal of past trade terms. "In terms of the US, He was ripping us off. So we made a deal with India. A fair deal now. We are not paying tariffs to them, and they are. We did a little flip," said Trump. Also read | Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy What the US-India trade deal covers India has agreed to cut or remove duties on US industrial goods and a range of farm products. These include dried distillers’ grains, red sorghum, tree nuts, fruits, soybean oil, wine and spirits. The US, on its part, will apply the 18 per cent tariff to Indian exports such as textiles, leather goods, footwear, chemicals, plastics, home decor and certain machinery. Notably, while the two nations announced the framework, the deal is yet to be signed. Officials from both countries are set to meet in the US on February 23 for three days to finalise the legal text. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently said the agreement is likely to take effect in April.

Will India still face 18 per cent US tariffs even after the Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping reciprocal duties? President Trump says “nothing changes” under the interim trade deal.Scroll down to find out what happens next.

Will India still pay 18% tariffs after SCOTUS scraps Trump reciprocal duties? Here’s what the POTUS said

The US Supreme Court struck down a broad set of tariffs imposed under President Donald Trump in a 6-3 decision. The ruling, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, marks a major development for US trade policy and executive authority. The decision is expected to have significant economic and political implications, with reactions emerging across markets and global partners.


Trump Announces Fresh 10% Global Tariff as Supreme Court's 6-3 Ruling Reshapes US Trade Strategy

The US Supreme Court on Friday struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 decision that translates to a clear message: your executive powers have limits.The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his second term. It removes a tool he has aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will.The most glaring example of tariffs as a political punishment came in July when Trump slapped a 50 percent on most Brazilian goods in response to what he called a “witch hunt” against former president Jair Bolsonaro, who was on trial for an attempted coup.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-neal-katyal-all-about-the-indian-origin-lawyer-who-led-legal-challenge-against-trump-tariffs-at-scotus-1771641242108">Who is Neal Katyal? All about the Indian-origin lawyer who led legal challenge against Trump tariffs at SCOTUS</a>The Brazilian government ignored the apparent attempt to stop the trial and Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years in prison.India was another example of Trump tariffs as a geopolitical weapon. Last August, tariffs on goods from India were doubled to 50 per cent as punishment for continued purchases of discounted Russian oil. &nbsp;The row was settled in February with an agreement to roll back tariffs from 50 to 18 per cent in exchange forthe &nbsp;Indian agreement to eliminate tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods with the stated goal to bring all barriers to zero. &nbsp;In an angry press conference denouncing the Supreme Court judges, Trump singled out Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a great man” and stressed that under the US.-Indian trade agreement, the US is no longer paying tariffs to India.The court on Friday rued that Trump had overstepped his legal authority by imposing broad tariffs on countries around the world without clear approval from Congress. &nbsp;Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, saying that if the Trump administration was allowed to pursue its tax agenda, “it would replace the long-standing executive-legislative collaboration over trade policy with unchecked Presidential policy-making. Accordingly, the President must point to clear congressional authorisation to justify his extraordinary assertion of the power to impose tariffs. He cannot,”The ruling applies to tariffs Trump announced on what he called “Liberation Day” on April 2, when he invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to address trade imbalances. Ostensibly, part of the “emergency” was rooted in the flow of drugs from Mexico and Canada.Friday’s ruling could be something of a turning point in Trump’s relentless pursuit of more executive power, which has stirred mass protests on several occasions by demonstrators lofting signs saying “No Kings.”The Supreme Court’s 6-3 majority has blessed Trump’s expansive exertion of presidential powers in a series of other rulings issued on an emergency basis. Friday’s decision enraged Trump in particular because two of the six judges who ruled against him were appointed by him in his first term.What was left unclear was whether the estimated $175 billion collected since “liberation day” would be returned to the importers who paid them. Much of the money was passed on to consumers and essentially amounted to taxes. That stood in contrast to Trump's campaign pledges that he would reduce taxes.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-absolutely-ashamed-of-certain-members-of-court-trump-lashes-out-at-supreme-court-over-tariff-decision-1771612420264">Trump announces 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court</a>Importers have already filed more than 1,000 lawsuits in the Court of International Trade, and a flood of new cases is likely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the logistics of refunds could drag on for “weeks, months, years.”Opposition to the reciprocal tariffs the Supreme Court ruled on had come from both sides of America’s division, even from Trump’s Vice President during his first term, Mike Pence, founder of Advancing American Freedom, a group that has lobbied against the levies.“American families and American businesses pay American tariffs – not foreign countries. With this decision, American families can sigh a breath of relief,” he said.Perhaps. Trump has already made clear that he will re-impose tariffs using other laws on presidential authority. He has not spelt out details but announced a new global tariff of 10 per cent.Even for a White House which excels in creating alternative realities, it will be difficult to portray the Supreme Court ruling as anything but an embarrassing defeat. Democrats will no doubt use it in the campaign for mid-term elections in November, a contest for the House of Representatives Republicans are predicted to lose. &nbsp;That would turn Donald Trump into a very lame duck and change the Washington political scene. &nbsp;

The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his 2nd term. It removes a tool he aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will.

The US Supreme Court on Friday struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 decision that translates to a clear message: your executive powers have limits. The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his second term. It removes a tool he has aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will. The most glaring example of tariffs as a political punishment came in July when Trump slapped a 50 percent on most Brazilian goods in response to what he called a “witch hunt” against former president Jair Bolsonaro, who was on trial for an attempted coup. Also read | Who is Neal Katyal? All about the Indian-origin lawyer who led legal challenge against Trump tariffs at SCOTUS The Brazilian government ignored the apparent attempt to stop the trial and Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years in prison. India was another example of Trump tariffs as a geopolitical weapon. Last August, tariffs on goods from India were doubled to 50 per cent as punishment for continued purchases of discounted Russian oil. The row was settled in February with an agreement to roll back tariffs from 50 to 18 per cent in exchange forthe Indian agreement to eliminate tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods with the stated goal to bring all barriers to zero. In an angry press conference denouncing the Supreme Court judges, Trump singled out Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a great man” and stressed that under the US.-Indian trade agreement, the US is no longer paying tariffs to India. The court on Friday rued that Trump had overstepped his legal authority by imposing broad tariffs on countries around the world without clear approval from Congress. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, saying that if the Trump administration was allowed to pursue its tax agenda, “it would replace the long-standing executive-legislative collaboration over trade policy with unchecked Presidential policy-making. Accordingly, the President must point to clear congressional authorisation to justify his extraordinary assertion of the power to impose tariffs. He cannot,” The ruling applies to tariffs Trump announced on what he called “Liberation Day” on April 2, when he invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to address trade imbalances. Ostensibly, part of the “emergency” was rooted in the flow of drugs from Mexico and Canada. Friday’s ruling could be something of a turning point in Trump’s relentless pursuit of more executive power, which has stirred mass protests on several occasions by demonstrators lofting signs saying “No Kings.” The Supreme Court’s 6-3 majority has blessed Trump’s expansive exertion of presidential powers in a series of other rulings issued on an emergency basis. Friday’s decision enraged Trump in particular because two of the six judges who ruled against him were appointed by him in his first term. What was left unclear was whether the estimated $175 billion collected since “liberation day” would be returned to the importers who paid them. Much of the money was passed on to consumers and essentially amounted to taxes. That stood in contrast to Trump's campaign pledges that he would reduce taxes. Also read | Trump announces 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court Importers have already filed more than 1,000 lawsuits in the Court of International Trade, and a flood of new cases is likely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the logistics of refunds could drag on for “weeks, months, years.” Opposition to the reciprocal tariffs the Supreme Court ruled on had come from both sides of America’s division, even from Trump’s Vice President during his first term, Mike Pence, founder of Advancing American Freedom, a group that has lobbied against the levies. “American families and American businesses pay American tariffs – not foreign countries. With this decision, American families can sigh a breath of relief,” he said. Perhaps. Trump has already made clear that he will re-impose tariffs using other laws on presidential authority. He has not spelt out details but announced a new global tariff of 10 per cent. Even for a White House which excels in creating alternative realities, it will be difficult to portray the Supreme Court ruling as anything but an embarrassing defeat. Democrats will no doubt use it in the campaign for mid-term elections in November, a contest for the House of Representatives Republicans are predicted to lose. That would turn Donald Trump into a very lame duck and change the Washington political scene.

The ruling was Trump’s first major defeat in his 2nd term. It removes a tool he aggressively used to remake US trade deals, collect billions of dollars from American companies importing foreign goods, and interfere in the domestic affairs of countries whose leaders fail to bend to his will.

Donald Trump suffers first major blow to his economic and diplomatic policy

US President Donald Trump on Friday (February 20) called on Iran’s leadership to enter negotiations for what he described as a “fair deal,” while sharply condemning the government’s human rights record and voicing concern for its citizens. Speaking at the White House, Trump drew a distinction between Iran’s rulers and its population, saying the Iranian people were enduring severe hardship. He referenced what he described as a deadly crackdown, claiming that 32,000 individuals had been killed in a short span of time, the first occasion on which he cited a specific figure.&nbsp;Trump also alleged that Iranian authorities had planned to execute hundreds of detainees, describing public hangings carried out by crane. He said he warned Tehran that any execution would trigger an immediate response from the United States. According to Trump, after his warning, Iran abandoned plans to execute 837 prisoners. “They didn’t hang them,” he said, adding that he had been told no executions ultimately took place.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-absolutely-ashamed-of-certain-members-of-court-trump-lashes-out-at-supreme-court-over-tariff-decision-1771612420264">Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court</a>&nbsp;Earlier in the day, Trump hinted he was weighing the possibility of a limited military strike as leverage to push Iran toward negotiations, though he did not elaborate on what such action might involve. Reiterating his sympathy for ordinary Iranians, Trump said they had been forced to live under extremely harsh conditions.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed</a>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump on Thursday (February 19) warned Iran that it has 10 to 15 days to reach what he described as a “meaningful deal” or face serious repercussions, raising the prospect of military action in the Middle East. In response, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the president of the Security Council warning that any strike on Iran would render US bases, facilities and other assets “legitimate targets.”&nbsp;Amid the escalating war of words, US military deployments in the region have reportedly increased, with American forces said to be prepared for possible action as early as this weekend. The United States has also moved the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group closer to Iranian waters, signaling heightened readiness as tensions intensify.

US President Donald Trump urges Iran to negotiate a “fair deal,” warned against executions, criticised Tehran’s crackdown, and hinted at possible military action

US President Donald Trump on Friday (February 20) called on Iran’s leadership to enter negotiations for what he described as a “fair deal,” while sharply condemning the government’s human rights record and voicing concern for its citizens. Speaking at the White House, Trump drew a distinction between Iran’s rulers and its population, saying the Iranian people were enduring severe hardship. He referenced what he described as a deadly crackdown, claiming that 32,000 individuals had been killed in a short span of time, the first occasion on which he cited a specific figure. Trump also alleged that Iranian authorities had planned to execute hundreds of detainees, describing public hangings carried out by crane. He said he warned Tehran that any execution would trigger an immediate response from the United States. According to Trump, after his warning, Iran abandoned plans to execute 837 prisoners. “They didn’t hang them,” he said, adding that he had been told no executions ultimately took place. Also Read: Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court Earlier in the day, Trump hinted he was weighing the possibility of a limited military strike as leverage to push Iran toward negotiations, though he did not elaborate on what such action might involve. Reiterating his sympathy for ordinary Iranians, Trump said they had been forced to live under extremely harsh conditions. https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed US President Donald Trump on Thursday (February 19) warned Iran that it has 10 to 15 days to reach what he described as a “meaningful deal” or face serious repercussions, raising the prospect of military action in the Middle East. In response, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the president of the Security Council warning that any strike on Iran would render US bases, facilities and other assets “legitimate targets.” Amid the escalating war of words, US military deployments in the region have reportedly increased, with American forces said to be prepared for possible action as early as this weekend. The United States has also moved the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group closer to Iranian waters, signaling heightened readiness as tensions intensify.

US President Donald Trump urges Iran to negotiate a “fair deal,” warned against executions, criticised Tehran’s crackdown, and hinted at possible military action

'32,000 people were killed during crackdown in Iran', says Donald Trump

President Donald Trump lashed out at the US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) after it struck down the tariffs he had imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), saying it "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." The US president said the decision is “deeply disappointing,” and "I am absolutely ashamed of certain members of the court" for not having “the courage to do what is right for our country.” He hailed the dissenting judges as patriots.&nbsp;&nbsp;Calling the judges who ruled against the tariffs ‘very unpatriotic’, Trump said, "In my opinion, the court has been swayed by foreign interest," adding that "Foreign countries are so happy and dancing on the street, and I can assure you - they won't dance longer," &nbsp;Trump said at a press conference after the verdict.&nbsp;Trump said, “This was an important case to me, more as economic security for the country" and threatened, ”I want to be very well. I understand how they are swayed away easily. I want to be a good boy.”&nbsp;

Mounting an attack on the apex court, the US president said, “I won by a million votes by landside despite the cheating “There was a lot of cheating.” Referring to Democrats and people opposed to his policies, he said, "These people are obnoxious, ignorant and loud, and certain justice is afraid of it.”&nbsp;He repeated his rhetoric of being a "president of peace", stating that “I settled eight wars, including India and Pakistan,” even if "you like it or not."<h2>Trump announces new 10 per cent global tariff</h2> Trump vowed to use other methods to reinstate sweeping tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down. “Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected,” adding that these options could also bring in more revenue.&nbsp;The US president announced that he was imposing an extra global tariff of 10 per cent on US trade partners.&nbsp;"The Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear, rather than less," he said.&nbsp;These remarks come after, the Supreme Court earlier in the day ruled, against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda.&nbsp;On April 2, 2025, a date he famously proclaimed as "Liberation Day," President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 to launch the most aggressive trade policy in modern American history. Invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by declaring a national emergency over the US trade deficit, the administration imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on nearly all global imports. This framework also introduced "reciprocal" duties reaching as high as 50% for major trading partners, aiming to counteract foreign trade barriers and revitalise domestic manufacturing.

Trump vowed to use other methods to reinstate sweeping tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down. “Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected,” he said, adding that these options could also bring in more revenue.

President Donald Trump lashed out at the US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) after it struck down the tariffs he had imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), saying it "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." The US president said the decision is “deeply disappointing,” and "I am absolutely ashamed of certain members of the court" for not having “the courage to do what is right for our country.” He hailed the dissenting judges as patriots. Calling the judges who ruled against the tariffs ‘very unpatriotic’, Trump said, "In my opinion, the court has been swayed by foreign interest," adding that "Foreign countries are so happy and dancing on the street, and I can assure you - they won't dance longer," Trump said at a press conference after the verdict. Trump said, “This was an important case to me, more as economic security for the country" and threatened, ”I want to be very well. I understand how they are swayed away easily. I want to be a good boy.”

Trump vowed to use other methods to reinstate sweeping tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down. “Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected,” he said, adding that these options could also bring in more revenue.

Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court

As the Trump administration still grappled with the fallout from the Epstein file release, Friday (Feb 20) appeared particularly tough for the Trump presidency, which dealt a triple blow during the day. The most significant comes from the United States Supreme Court, which ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs."&nbsp;Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda.&nbsp;The second setback came on economic polices, as the government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent.&nbsp;Full-year GDP growth came in at 2.2 per cent in 2025, lower than the 2.8 per cent figure for the prior year.&nbsp;Trump, who often touts himself as the best president in US history in terms of managning economy, blamed Democrats for the faltering growth.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-donald-trump-s-global-tariffs-1771601310479">US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs</a> "The Democrat Shutdown cost the U.S.A. at least two points in GDP," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post, about a half-hour before the official results were published.&nbsp;He also pointed the finger again at the Federal Reserve, bashing outgoing Chairman Jerome Powell and calling for "LOWER INTEREST RATES."&nbsp;The third hit comes in terms of the US president's approval rating, which plummeted to its lowest in his second term after nearly 13 months in the White House.&nbsp;According to Reuters/Ipsos polls, Trump's overall approval rating in the four-day poll is reported to be 38%. The president was previously reported to be at 39% in January, which was a drastic decline from the 50% highpoint shortly after his 2025 inauguration. A new ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll showed that a majority 58% said Trump was going "too far" with deportations of undocumented immigrants, which was an increase from the 50% reported in October. Only 12% of respondents claimed the president was "not going far enough", and 28% said he is “handling it about right.”

The government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent.

As the Trump administration still grappled with the fallout from the Epstein file release, Friday (Feb 20) appeared particularly tough for the Trump presidency, which dealt a triple blow during the day. The most significant comes from the United States Supreme Court, which ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda. The second setback came on economic polices, as the government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent. Full-year GDP growth came in at 2.2 per cent in 2025, lower than the 2.8 per cent figure for the prior year. Trump, who often touts himself as the best president in US history in terms of managning economy, blamed Democrats for the faltering growth. Also Read: US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs "The Democrat Shutdown cost the U.S.A. at least two points in GDP," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post, about a half-hour before the official results were published. He also pointed the finger again at the Federal Reserve, bashing outgoing Chairman Jerome Powell and calling for "LOWER INTEREST RATES." The third hit comes in terms of the US president's approval rating, which plummeted to its lowest in his second term after nearly 13 months in the White House. According to Reuters/Ipsos polls, Trump's overall approval rating in the four-day poll is reported to be 38%. The president was previously reported to be at 39% in January, which was a drastic decline from the 50% highpoint shortly after his 2025 inauguration. A new ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll showed that a majority 58% said Trump was going "too far" with deportations of undocumented immigrants, which was an increase from the 50% reported in October. Only 12% of respondents claimed the president was "not going far enough", and 28% said he is “handling it about right.”

The government data on Friday showed that the US economy recorded a moderate GDP growth rate of 1.4 per cent in the October to December quarter against earlier forecasts of 2.5 per cent.

Tough day for Trump administration as US president dealt triple blow

The US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda.&nbsp;Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs."&nbsp;Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.&nbsp;“The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope," Roberts wrote. However, the Trump administration “points to no statute" in which Congress has previously said that the language in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) could apply to tariffs, he said&nbsp;“In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it," the Chief Justice remarked. He noted that any “extraordinary assertion" of such power requires “clear congressional authorisation", which Trump did not have.&nbsp;The court also pointed out that "had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs" with IEEPA, "it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes."&nbsp;Notably, the ruling does not apply to sector-specific levies that Donald Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods under different legal authorities. Trump has long used tariffs as a primary means of exercising power and achieving political goals, often describing them as “beautiful” and hailing duties as a way to solve major national problems, such as the widening trade deficit and rising debt.&nbsp;The US President even went to great lengths to use these levies as leverage, threatening long-standing partners Canada and Mexico with additional duties over policy disagreements. India has also been on the receiving end of Trump’s tariff wars; for months, New Delhi faced 50 per cent duties, among the highest in the world, before the two countries recently moved toward a new trade deal.&nbsp;On April 2, 2025, a date he famously proclaimed as "Liberation Day," President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 to launch the most aggressive trade policy in modern American history.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-us-to-start-interim-trade-talks-feb-23-in-us-likely-to-operationalise-by-april-1771597322925">India, US to hold talks from Feb 23 on sealing trade deal, signing soon after</a>&nbsp;Invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by declaring a national emergency over the US trade deficit, the administration imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on nearly all global imports. This framework also introduced "reciprocal" duties reaching as high as 50% for major trading partners, aiming to counteract foreign trade barriers and revitalise domestic manufacturing.

The ruling does not impact sector-specific duties that Trump has separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods.

The US Supreme Court on Friday (Feb 20) ruled against Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that the US president has exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping duties that disrupted global trade. The decision blocks Trump from using tariffs as a tool, which he used freely to achieve political goals and renegotiate trade deals with countries aligned with his economic agenda. Despite being a conservative majority, the court ruled six-three in the judgment stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorise the President to impose tariffs." Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court while Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. “The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope," Roberts wrote. However, the Trump administration “points to no statute" in which Congress has previously said that the language in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) could apply to tariffs, he said “In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it," the Chief Justice remarked. He noted that any “extraordinary assertion" of such power requires “clear congressional authorisation", which Trump did not have. The court also pointed out that "had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs" with IEEPA, "it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes." Notably, the ruling does not apply to sector-specific levies that Donald Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods under different legal authorities. Trump has long used tariffs as a primary means of exercising power and achieving political goals, often describing them as “beautiful” and hailing duties as a way to solve major national problems, such as the widening trade deficit and rising debt. The US President even went to great lengths to use these levies as leverage, threatening long-standing partners Canada and Mexico with additional duties over policy disagreements. India has also been on the receiving end of Trump’s tariff wars; for months, New Delhi faced 50 per cent duties, among the highest in the world, before the two countries recently moved toward a new trade deal. On April 2, 2025, a date he famously proclaimed as "Liberation Day," President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 to launch the most aggressive trade policy in modern American history. Also Read: India, US to hold talks from Feb 23 on sealing trade deal, signing soon after Invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by declaring a national emergency over the US trade deficit, the administration imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on nearly all global imports. This framework also introduced "reciprocal" duties reaching as high as 50% for major trading partners, aiming to counteract foreign trade barriers and revitalise domestic manufacturing.

The ruling does not impact sector-specific duties that Trump has separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminium, and various other goods.

US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs

U.S. President Donald Trump has directed government agencies, including the Pentagon, to identify and release files related to aliens, extraterrestrial life, UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena), and UFOs. Trump said the effort will provide transparency on what the U.S. government knows about extraterrestrial activity. The move has reignited global interest in Area 51, UFOs, and government disclosure debates. Officials have yet to announce a timeline for the release, but the directive marks a significant step toward declassifying long-hidden information about unidentified phenomena.


What is Area 51? Trump Orders Release of Data on UFOs, Aliens

In an unprecedented image-building effort, an airport in Florida will be renamed after US President Donald Trump, after a bill proposing the change was approved by the state's legislature on Thursday. The development marks Trump's continuing bid to attach his name to major buildings and monuments. The US president, who was a real estate mogul before his foray into politics, has several buildings around the world named after him, including the Trump World Tower near United Nations headquarters in New York. The approval comes from Florida's Republican Party-led legislature, which passed a bill to rename the Palm Beach International Airport as the "President Donald J Trump International Airport. "Governor Ron DeSantis. who ran against Trump to secure the party nomination for the 2024 Presidential election is expected to sign the measure into law.&nbsp;The airport in Palm Beach, a town known for its sandy beaches and luxurious estates, is just minutes away from Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence, which became host of several diplomatic events.&nbsp;The approval of the Federal Aviation Administration is also required to rename the airport. However, it is expected to go through without any hurdles with Trump at the helm in Washington.&nbsp;After completion of formalities, it will become the latest institution to be renamed after Trump.&nbsp;Earlier, the Kennedy Centre in Washington, known for its arts complex and memorial to late president John F. Kennedy, was renamed "Trump-Kennedy Centre," after its board, handpicked by the US president, voted in favour of renaming.&nbsp;Moreover, the State Department added Trump's name to the US Institute of Peace.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-unfortunate-blame-game-supreme-court-tells-calcutta-hc-to-appoint-judicial-officers-for-bengal-sir-1771584030855">‘Unfortunate blame game’: Supreme Court tells Calcutta HC to appoint judicial officers for Bengal SIR</a>&nbsp;Joining what critics call the “Trump admiration club,” the United States Treasury has proposed preliminary designs for a commemorative $1 coin to mark the nation’s 250th anniversary, also known as the Semiquincentennial.&nbsp;According to design concepts released by the United States Mint, the obverse of the proposed coin features the profile of Donald Trump. The reverse depicts Trump raising his fist against a backdrop of the American flag, accompanied by the caption: “Fight! Fight! Fight!”&nbsp;The proposal has triggered significant debate in policy and legal circles. Under long-standing US law and tradition, living presidents are generally not permitted to appear on circulating legal tender.

The approval comes from Florida's Republican Party-led legislature, which passed a bill to rename the Palm Beach International Airport as the "President Donald J Trump International Airport. "

In an unprecedented image-building effort, an airport in Florida will be renamed after US President Donald Trump, after a bill proposing the change was approved by the state's legislature on Thursday. The development marks Trump's continuing bid to attach his name to major buildings and monuments. The US president, who was a real estate mogul before his foray into politics, has several buildings around the world named after him, including the Trump World Tower near United Nations headquarters in New York. The approval comes from Florida's Republican Party-led legislature, which passed a bill to rename the Palm Beach International Airport as the "President Donald J Trump International Airport. "Governor Ron DeSantis. who ran against Trump to secure the party nomination for the 2024 Presidential election is expected to sign the measure into law. The airport in Palm Beach, a town known for its sandy beaches and luxurious estates, is just minutes away from Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence, which became host of several diplomatic events. The approval of the Federal Aviation Administration is also required to rename the airport. However, it is expected to go through without any hurdles with Trump at the helm in Washington. After completion of formalities, it will become the latest institution to be renamed after Trump. Earlier, the Kennedy Centre in Washington, known for its arts complex and memorial to late president John F. Kennedy, was renamed "Trump-Kennedy Centre," after its board, handpicked by the US president, voted in favour of renaming. Moreover, the State Department added Trump's name to the US Institute of Peace. Also Read: ‘Unfortunate blame game’: Supreme Court tells Calcutta HC to appoint judicial officers for Bengal SIR Joining what critics call the “Trump admiration club,” the United States Treasury has proposed preliminary designs for a commemorative $1 coin to mark the nation’s 250th anniversary, also known as the Semiquincentennial. According to design concepts released by the United States Mint, the obverse of the proposed coin features the profile of Donald Trump. The reverse depicts Trump raising his fist against a backdrop of the American flag, accompanied by the caption: “Fight! Fight! Fight!” The proposal has triggered significant debate in policy and legal circles. Under long-standing US law and tradition, living presidents are generally not permitted to appear on circulating legal tender.

The approval comes from Florida's Republican Party-led legislature, which passed a bill to rename the Palm Beach International Airport as the "President Donald J Trump International Airport. "

After Kennedy Center, airport in Florida to be renamed after US President Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump announced a $10 billion fund for the Gaza Board of Peace, aiming to support reconstruction, aid distribution, and stabilization efforts in the conflict-hit Palestinian territory. The plan brings together international leaders to coordinate governance, humanitarian assistance, and security measures. This initiative marks a major step in global efforts to rebuild Gaza and foster long-term peace.


Gaza Peace Plan: Trump Sets Aside $10 Billion for the Funding of Board of Peace

President Donald Trump held a major economic speech in Georgia on Thursday, highlighting what he calls his successes in lowering inflation, boosting American energy production, and creating jobs. He also touted his tariff policies and promised further affordability for Americans ahead of the midterm elections.


Trump Touts Economic Gains in Georgia Speech

The first meeting of the Gaza Board of Peace was held in Washington, D.C., chaired by US President Donald Trump with delegates from around two dozen countries. Leaders pledged billions in aid and support for Gaza’s reconstruction and discussed plans for an international stabilization force and governance in the war-torn Palestinian territory. The summit aims to boost peace efforts after years of conflict, though many questions remain about implementation and participation.


Gaza Board Peace Meeting: First Meeting of Gaza Board of Peace Held in Washington

Tensions between the US and Iran escalate as the Trump administration edges closer to a potential conflict in West Asia. Military movements, diplomatic standoffs, and high-stakes negotiations have heightened fears of a major war. This report breaks down the latest developments, strategic responses, and the global implications of rising US-Iran hostilities.


US-Iran Tensions: Trump Administration is Closer to a Major War in West Asia 

US President Donald Trump claims he played a key peacemaker role amid rising India-Pakistan tensions, asserting his involvement in de-escalation efforts. He also controversially states that 11 jets have been shot down during the conflict. 


India-Pakistan War: Trump Claims Peacemaker Role Again, Then Says 11 Jets Shot Down

The Donald Trump administration, as per reports, is planning to construct a large military base in southern Gaza. The proposed installation would span more than 350 acres and house up to 5,000 personnel.<h2>A US military base in Gaza?</h2>According to a The Guardian report, the Board of Peace contracting records show that the military base is being envisioned as a military operating base for a future International Stabilization Force.The base is envisioned as the operational hub of a multinational force operating under the newly created Board of Peace, an entity chaired by US President Donald Trump and reportedly led in part by his son-in-law Jared Kushner. The United Nations Security Council has authorised the Board to establish a temporary stabilisation mission in Gaza, tasked with securing borders, protecting civilians and supporting vetted Palestinian police units.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/shaping-a-presidential-legacy-from-donald-j-trump-international-airport-kennedy-center-to-warships-trump-s-latest-self-naming-moves-in-pics-1771400773467">What's in a name? Trump's many attempts to leave behind a presidential legacy: Airport, warship and more | In pics</a><h2>How big would the compound be?</h2>According to the documents, the compound would measure roughly 1,400 by 1,100 meters and be surrounded by barbed wire and 26 armoured watchtowers. Plans include bunkers with reinforced ventilation systems, a small-arms range, and storage facilities for military equipment. "The Contractor," reads the document, "shall conduct a geophysical survey of the site to identify any subterranean voids, tunnels, or large cavities per phase," a likely reference to Hamas’s extensive tunnel network.The site is described as a flat, arid stretch of land in southern Gaza, an area heavily damaged during the conflict.<h2>Human Remains Protocol</h2>According to the Guardian, one section of the proposal outlines a "Human Remains Protocol" that requires work to stop if suspected remains are discovered. "If suspected human remains or cultural artefacts are discovered, all work in the immediate area must cease immediately, the area must be secured, and the Contracting Officer must be notified immediately for direction". Gaza authorities have said thousands of bodies remain buried beneath rubble.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/vatican-snubs-trump-s-board-of-peace-invitation-over-governance-concerns-leavitt-hits-back-at-pope-1771462475804">Vatican snubs Trump’s Gaza Board of Peace invitation over governance concerns; Leavitt hits back at Pope</a>Indonesia has reportedly offered up to 8,000 troops for the stabilisation force, and more than 20 countries have signed onto the Board of Peace. However, several governments, and most recently the Pope, have declined to participate, and critics have questioned the Board's governance structure, noting that its charter appears to grant Trump permanent leadership.

The Donald Trump administration is reportedly planning a 350 acre military base in southern Gaza to house up to 5,000 personnel under the new Board of Peace. All you need to know.

The Donald Trump administration, as per reports, is planning to construct a large military base in southern Gaza. The proposed installation would span more than 350 acres and house up to 5,000 personnel. A US military base in Gaza? According to a The Guardian report, the Board of Peace contracting records show that the military base is being envisioned as a military operating base for a future International Stabilization Force. The base is envisioned as the operational hub of a multinational force operating under the newly created Board of Peace, an entity chaired by US President Donald Trump and reportedly led in part by his son-in-law Jared Kushner. The United Nations Security Council has authorised the Board to establish a temporary stabilisation mission in Gaza, tasked with securing borders, protecting civilians and supporting vetted Palestinian police units. Also read | What's in a name? Trump's many attempts to leave behind a presidential legacy: Airport, warship and more | In pics How big would the compound be? According to the documents, the compound would measure roughly 1,400 by 1,100 meters and be surrounded by barbed wire and 26 armoured watchtowers. Plans include bunkers with reinforced ventilation systems, a small-arms range, and storage facilities for military equipment. "The Contractor," reads the document, "shall conduct a geophysical survey of the site to identify any subterranean voids, tunnels, or large cavities per phase," a likely reference to Hamas’s extensive tunnel network. The site is described as a flat, arid stretch of land in southern Gaza, an area heavily damaged during the conflict. Human Remains Protocol According to the Guardian, one section of the proposal outlines a "Human Remains Protocol" that requires work to stop if suspected remains are discovered. "If suspected human remains or cultural artefacts are discovered, all work in the immediate area must cease immediately, the area must be secured, and the Contracting Officer must be notified immediately for direction". Gaza authorities have said thousands of bodies remain buried beneath rubble. Also read | Vatican snubs Trump’s Gaza Board of Peace invitation over governance concerns; Leavitt hits back at Pope Indonesia has reportedly offered up to 8,000 troops for the stabilisation force, and more than 20 countries have signed onto the Board of Peace. However, several governments, and most recently the Pope, have declined to participate, and critics have questioned the Board's governance structure, noting that its charter appears to grant Trump permanent leadership.

The Donald Trump administration is reportedly planning a 350 acre military base in southern Gaza to house up to 5,000 personnel under the new Board of Peace. All you need to know.

Trump administration to build 350-acre US base in war-scarred Gaza: Report

US President Donald Trump called the arrest of former British Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over his alleged ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein “a shame” and said it is “bad for the royal family.” Meanwhile, Andrew has been released under investigation on suspicion of misconduct in public office related to his role as the UK’s trade envoy.


Epstein Files: Donald Trump Labels Ex-Prince Andrew Arrest “A Shame,” Warns of Royal Fallout

Tensions between the United States and Iran continue to escalate as President Donald Trump demands Tehran agree to a deal, warning of severe consequences if no agreement is reached. The US has deployed additional warships, aircraft carriers and fighter jets to the Middle East to pressure Iran amid stalled nuclear talks and growing fears of conflict.


US-Iran Tensions: Trump Asks Tehran for Deal As US Deploys More Warships, Jets

Lara Trump, Donald Trump's daughter-in-law, has claimed that the president has a speech prepared for the day he addresses the discovery of alien life. The 43-year-old was speaking on the New York Post’s Pod Force One podcast, where she stated that her father-in-law was being "really coy" when she and Eric (her husband) asked him if he knew something about extraterrestrials. On the podcast, Lara was asked about former President Barack Obama's admission about aliens in a recent interview. Talking to podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen, Obama seemingly confirmed the existence of extraterrestrials. But he changed his stance the next day, stressing that he saw “no evidence" of aliens as president. Host Miranda Devine asked Lara if Trump is preparing to make an announcement on aliens. "Do you think that he’s about to make an announcement about UFOs, because President Obama was just on a podcast talking about how he believes in UFOs and hinting that he saw something when he was president?” the host asked.&nbsp;“What’s kind of funny is we’ve kind of asked my father-in-law about this cause we’re like, ‘Well, what do you know?'” Lara said. She said that Trump “played a little coy” when she and Eric inquired about the possibility of extraterrestrial life. “Eric and I were like, ‘Oh my gosh, he won’t even fully tell us, maybe there’s more to it,’” she said. Lara then went on to admit that she had heard that her father-in-law even has a speech prepared. “I have just heard kind of around that he’s actually said, my father-in-law has actually said it, that there is some speech that he has, that I guess at the right time...I don’t know what the right time is...that he is going to break out and talk about, and it has to do with maybe some sort of extraterrestrial life, so to speak,” Lara added.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-since-it-s-gotten-attention-obama-clarifies-on-aliens-are-real-claim-after-video-goes-viral-1771223501347">‘Since it’s gotten attention...’: Obama clarifies on ‘aliens are real’ claim after video goes viral</a><h2>Claims of alien bodies and spacecraft at secret facilities</h2>There have been reports that Trump is gearing up to make an announcement on extraterrestrial life and objects that have been gathered over the years. A few days ago, he reportedly permitted the release of all information on secret UFO facilities in the United States, such as Area 51. US Congressman Eric Burlison of Missouri had sought permission from the president to visit these secure locations tied to UFOs and secret government projects. Over the years, many whistleblowers have confessed that the US is hiding bodies of aliens who visited Earth, and the wreckage of their spacecraft. However, all governments have rubbished these claims.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Donald Trump is reportedly ready to speak about aliens and extraterrestrial spacecraft present on Earth. His daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, claimed on a podcast that the president refused to come clean when she asked about aliens, but she has heard about a speech. 

Lara Trump, Donald Trump's daughter-in-law, has claimed that the president has a speech prepared for the day he addresses the discovery of alien life. The 43-year-old was speaking on the New York Post’s Pod Force One podcast, where she stated that her father-in-law was being "really coy" when she and Eric (her husband) asked him if he knew something about extraterrestrials. On the podcast, Lara was asked about former President Barack Obama's admission about aliens in a recent interview. Talking to podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen, Obama seemingly confirmed the existence of extraterrestrials. But he changed his stance the next day, stressing that he saw “no evidence" of aliens as president. Host Miranda Devine asked Lara if Trump is preparing to make an announcement on aliens. "Do you think that he’s about to make an announcement about UFOs, because President Obama was just on a podcast talking about how he believes in UFOs and hinting that he saw something when he was president?” the host asked. “What’s kind of funny is we’ve kind of asked my father-in-law about this cause we’re like, ‘Well, what do you know?'” Lara said. She said that Trump “played a little coy” when she and Eric inquired about the possibility of extraterrestrial life. “Eric and I were like, ‘Oh my gosh, he won’t even fully tell us, maybe there’s more to it,’” she said. Lara then went on to admit that she had heard that her father-in-law even has a speech prepared. “I have just heard kind of around that he’s actually said, my father-in-law has actually said it, that there is some speech that he has, that I guess at the right time...I don’t know what the right time is...that he is going to break out and talk about, and it has to do with maybe some sort of extraterrestrial life, so to speak,” Lara added. Also Read: ‘Since it’s gotten attention...’: Obama clarifies on ‘aliens are real’ claim after video goes viral Claims of alien bodies and spacecraft at secret facilities There have been reports that Trump is gearing up to make an announcement on extraterrestrial life and objects that have been gathered over the years. A few days ago, he reportedly permitted the release of all information on secret UFO facilities in the United States, such as Area 51. US Congressman Eric Burlison of Missouri had sought permission from the president to visit these secure locations tied to UFOs and secret government projects. Over the years, many whistleblowers have confessed that the US is hiding bodies of aliens who visited Earth, and the wreckage of their spacecraft. However, all governments have rubbished these claims.

Donald Trump is reportedly ready to speak about aliens and extraterrestrial spacecraft present on Earth. His daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, claimed on a podcast that the president refused to come clean when she asked about aliens, but she has heard about a speech.&nbsp;

Donald Trump has a speech prepared on aliens, his daughter-in-law says

US President Donald Trump has claimed that during last year’s military escalation between India and Pakistan, as many as 11 jets were shot down — a figure he repeated while asserting he helped broker a ceasefire by threatening trade penalties. India has consistently rejected any third‑party mediation in the conflict, saying de‑escalation was agreed directly between the two militaries.


Donald Trump Says 11 Jets Shot Down During India-Pak Hostilities Last Year 

#Gravitas In a phone call earlier this month, Chinese President Xi Jinping reportedly urged U.S. President Donald Trump to tread carefully on weapons sales to Taiwan. Trump later confirmed he discussed the issue with Xi and said he would decide on the issue soon.  


US-China: Wary of Xi, Trump Holds Back Weapons Sale to Taiwan? 

US President Donald Trump addressed the inaugural meeting of the Gaza Peace Board on Thursday (Feb 19). Trump once again took the credit for ending eight wars. Trump said that 11 jets were shot down during the India-Pakistan war. This is the sixth change in the numbers in Trump's speech. Trump opened his statement by repeating his disputed assertion that he has brought an end to eight wars, while acknowledging that the war in Ukraine remains unresolved.&nbsp;Welcoming member states to the inaugural meeting of the “Board of Peace” at the United States Institute of Peace, Trump claimed the initiative carries unmatched prestige and influence. He suggested that some countries, particularly certain NATO allies, were hesitating to join but would eventually come on board. He described his first year back in office as unprecedented, citing what he said were eight settled conflicts and hinting that a ninth may soon follow, though he admitted that effort has proven more difficult.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/pakistan-faces-embarrassment-as-foreign-ministry-types-united-states-of-america-wrong-in-x-post-1771511687725">Pakistan faces embarrassment as Foreign Ministry types United States of America wrong in X post</a>&nbsp;Trump characterised the Board of Peace as one of the most significant undertakings of his career, emphasising collaboration with international leaders to resolve global conflicts. Turning to Iran, he praised diplomatic efforts led by envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. Trump described Iran as a current flashpoint but said productive discussions were underway. He stressed that any agreement must be meaningful, warning that failure to reach a deal could have serious consequences. He reiterated that Iran must not obtain nuclear weapons, arguing that peace in the Middle East would be impossible if it did.<h2>‘Situation highly complex’: Trump on Gaza</h2>Addressing Gaza, Trump called the situation highly complex and thanked Witkoff, Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President JD Vance, describing them as an exceptional team. He said the Board of Peace would help secure a brighter future for Gaza, the broader Middle East, and beyond. Trump described the board as composed largely of global leaders, many from the Middle East, along with other respected figures who have also contributed financially. He argued that peace is far less costly than war, saying conflict is “a hundred times” more expensive.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-president-meets-cuban-foreign-minister-discuss-support-measures-for-havana-wion-1771512294147/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-president-meets-cuban-foreign-minister-discuss-support-measures-for-havana-wion-1771512294147/embed</a><h2>Trump thanks FIFA President Gianni Infantino</h2>He also mentioned proposed projects connected to football (soccer), including building playing fields in Gaza and bringing prominent international players to the area. Trump thanked FIFA president Gianni Infantino for awarding him a FIFA Peace Prize, again expressing frustration over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.<h2>Board of Peace will ‘look over’ United Nations: Trump</h2>In closing, Trump said the Board of Peace would effectively “look over” the United Nations to ensure it operates properly. He suggested the board could support the UN financially and help maintain its viability, though he did not provide details. Repeating his view that the UN has significant untapped potential, Trump predicted the Board of Peace would become an unprecedented global institution.

‘11 jets shot in India-Pak war’: Trump changes figures again, hikes tally of fighter planes

US President Donald Trump addressed the inaugural meeting of the Gaza Peace Board on Thursday (Feb 19). Trump once again took the credit for ending eight wars. Trump said that 11 jets were shot down during the India-Pakistan war. This is the sixth change in the numbers in Trump's speech. Trump opened his statement by repeating his disputed assertion that he has brought an end to eight wars, while acknowledging that the war in Ukraine remains unresolved. Welcoming member states to the inaugural meeting of the “Board of Peace” at the United States Institute of Peace, Trump claimed the initiative carries unmatched prestige and influence. He suggested that some countries, particularly certain NATO allies, were hesitating to join but would eventually come on board. He described his first year back in office as unprecedented, citing what he said were eight settled conflicts and hinting that a ninth may soon follow, though he admitted that effort has proven more difficult. Also Read: Pakistan faces embarrassment as Foreign Ministry types United States of America wrong in X post Trump characterised the Board of Peace as one of the most significant undertakings of his career, emphasising collaboration with international leaders to resolve global conflicts. Turning to Iran, he praised diplomatic efforts led by envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. Trump described Iran as a current flashpoint but said productive discussions were underway. He stressed that any agreement must be meaningful, warning that failure to reach a deal could have serious consequences. He reiterated that Iran must not obtain nuclear weapons, arguing that peace in the Middle East would be impossible if it did. ‘Situation highly complex’: Trump on Gaza Addressing Gaza, Trump called the situation highly complex and thanked Witkoff, Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President JD Vance, describing them as an exceptional team. He said the Board of Peace would help secure a brighter future for Gaza, the broader Middle East, and beyond. Trump described the board as composed largely of global leaders, many from the Middle East, along with other respected figures who have also contributed financially. He argued that peace is far less costly than war, saying conflict is “a hundred times” more expensive. https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-president-meets-cuban-foreign-minister-discuss-support-measures-for-havana-wion-1771512294147/embed Trump thanks FIFA President Gianni Infantino He also mentioned proposed projects connected to football (soccer), including building playing fields in Gaza and bringing prominent international players to the area. Trump thanked FIFA president Gianni Infantino for awarding him a FIFA Peace Prize, again expressing frustration over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. Board of Peace will ‘look over’ United Nations: Trump In closing, Trump said the Board of Peace would effectively “look over” the United Nations to ensure it operates properly. He suggested the board could support the UN financially and help maintain its viability, though he did not provide details. Repeating his view that the UN has significant untapped potential, Trump predicted the Board of Peace would become an unprecedented global institution.

US President Donald Trump addressed the inaugural meeting of the Gaza Peace Board on Thursday (February 19). 26 countries joined the first meeting

The conservative commentator and a former Fox News anchor, Tucker Carlson, along with his crew, was briefly detained at the Ben Gurion airport after his interview with Mike Huckabee, the U.S. Ambassador to Israel. The US embassy to Israel denied these claims, arguing that Carlson was subjected to the routine procedures. Former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett called Tucker Carlson a “chicken.”“Men who identified themselves as airport security took our passports, hauled our executive producer into a side room and then demanded to know what we spoke to Ambassador Huckabee about,” said Carlson as reported by the British tabloid Daily Mail.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Greetings from Israel. <a href="https://t.co/1uBWvqBNST">pic.twitter.com/1uBWvqBNST</a>&mdash; Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) <a href="https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/2024109388865155244?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 18, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Carlson and his entourage are out of Israel. Carlson travelled to Israel in his private aircraft and stayed for around 180 minutes at the Ben Gurion airport. &nbsp;Ambassador Mike Huckabee has said that Carlson and his team, like everyone else, got their passport checked and had to answer security questions.&nbsp;Former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett called Carlson a “phoney”. “Tucker Carlson is a chicken—. The guy who’s been spouting lies about Israel for the past two years, landed today at Ben Gurion airport, took a quick picture in the logistics zone, tweeted it to pretend he’s actually IN Israel (so he can later claim that he’s a serious reporter who toured Israel), didn’t even step foot in country, then made up a story that he’s being supposedly harassed by our security (didn’t happen), whined about it, got back into the private jet and flew off,” said Naftali Bennett.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-freedom-gov-portal-eu-content-vpn-digital-governance-1771479157581">US to launch an online portal featuring banned content around the world</a><h2>Carlson was asked by Trump to tone down on Israel</h2>According to former Fox Business anchor Melissa Francis, Trump has urged Carlson to &nbsp;“turn down the temperature” on Israel. The rift between the US right has widened, especially regarding the US foreign policy and its support of the genocide in Palestine. Tucker Carlson has had guests on his podcast who have been critical of Israel, and he has been very outspoken against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. From Charlie Kirk, Candace Ownes to, Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Thomas Massie, all of them have vocally opposed the Netanyahu government. Before Charlie Kirk was killed in Utah, he was pressured by Bill Ackman, a Zionist, against hosting Tucker Carlson at Turning Point USA. Marjorie Taylor Greene famously said she left her seat at the US House of Representatives because she did not want to be the “next Charlie Kirk”. &nbsp;“President Trump is telling everyone, including Tucker, ‘Let’s take this down,’” said Melissa.&nbsp;

Tucker Carlson was briefly detained at Ben Gurion Airport after interviewing US Ambassador Mike Huckabee. Israel denies harassment claims.

The conservative commentator and a former Fox News anchor, Tucker Carlson, along with his crew, was briefly detained at the Ben Gurion airport after his interview with Mike Huckabee, the U.S. Ambassador to Israel. The US embassy to Israel denied these claims, arguing that Carlson was subjected to the routine procedures. Former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett called Tucker Carlson a “chicken.” “Men who identified themselves as airport security took our passports, hauled our executive producer into a side room and then demanded to know what we spoke to Ambassador Huckabee about,” said Carlson as reported by the British tabloid Daily Mail.

Tucker Carlson was briefly detained at Ben Gurion Airport after interviewing US Ambassador Mike Huckabee. Israel denies harassment claims.

Israel briefly 'detained' US conservative commentator Tucker Carlson

US Congressman Brad Sherman on Wednesday (Feb 18) slammed President Donald Trump's continued pressure on India regarding its purchase of Russian oil, calling the policy unfair and inconsistent. In a statement posted on social media, Sherman accused Trump of "grasping for excuses to slap outrageous tariffs on India." The California Democrat questioned why India was being penalised despite importing a smaller share of crude from Russia compared to some European countries.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/moscow-rejects-us-claim-india-will-ditch-russian-oil-says-trump-trying-to-grab-right-to-dictate-to-independent-nations-1771464523183">Russia blasts US over India oil claim, slams Trump's attempt to dictate terms</a>

<h2>India 'being singled out'?</h2>Sherman pointed out that India imports roughly 21 per cent of its crude oil from Russia, yet faces tariff threats. By contrast, he noted, Hungary sources nearly 90 per cent of its crude from Russia but has not been subjected to similar tariff action."He claims it’s about importing Russian oil — yet Hungary imports 90% of its crude from Russia with no tariffs," Sherman wrote. He also highlighted that China, Russia's largest oil buyer, has not faced sanctions specifically tied to its purchase of Russian crude.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/white-house-releases-first-official-fact-sheet-on-us-india-trade-deal-says-it-ll-open-1-4b-strong-market-to-american-goods-1770701855280">White House releases first official fact sheet on US-India trade deal; no mention of New Delhi ending Russian oil purchase</a>"India gets just 21% of its crude from Russia, but our ally is being singled out," he added, urging the administration to reverse the policy. "The President should reverse this policy immediately."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">President Trump is grasping for excuses to slap outrageous tariffs on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/India?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#India</a>. He claims it’s about importing Russian oil — yet Hungary imports 90% of its crude from Russia with no tariffs. And China, Russia’s biggest oil buyer, hasn’t been hit with sanctions tied to purchasing…&mdash; Congressman Brad Sherman (@BradSherman) <a href="https://twitter.com/BradSherman/status/2024246649296392496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 18, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Russia slams Trump</h2>Congressman Sherman's statement comes on the heels of Russia's vehement rejection that India was preparing to cut back on purchases of Russian oil. Pushing back against claims from Washington that New Delhi has agreed to halt imports of Russian crude, the Russian Foreign Ministry said it had "no reason to believe" that was true.&nbsp;Speaking at her weekly briefing, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said Moscow sees "no reason to believe" that India has shifted its position on buying Russian hydrocarbons."India’s purchase of Russian hydrocarbons benefits both countries and helps maintain stability in the international energy market," she said, according to PTI.&nbsp;

US Congressman Brad Sherman slammed President Donald Trump’s pressure on India over Russian oil imports, calling it unfair and inconsistent. He said India, which imports about 21 per cent of its crude from Russia, was being ‘singled out’. Here's what he said.

US Congressman Brad Sherman on Wednesday (Feb 18) slammed President Donald Trump's continued pressure on India regarding its purchase of Russian oil, calling the policy unfair and inconsistent. In a statement posted on social media, Sherman accused Trump of "grasping for excuses to slap outrageous tariffs on India." The California Democrat questioned why India was being penalised despite importing a smaller share of crude from Russia compared to some European countries. Also read | Russia blasts US over India oil claim, slams Trump's attempt to dictate terms

US Congressman Brad Sherman slammed President Donald Trump’s pressure on India over Russian oil imports, calling it unfair and inconsistent. He said India, which imports about 21 per cent of its crude from Russia, was being ‘singled out’. Here's what he said.

India 'being singled out’? US Congressman accuses Trump of using Russian oil as excuse to hit New Delhi with tariffs

Russia on Wednesday (Feb 18) vehemently rejected US suggestions that India was preparing to cut back on purchases of Russian oil. Pushing back against claims from Washington that New Delhi has agreed to halt imports of Russian crude, the Russian Foreign Ministry said it had "no reason to believe" that was true. This comes as the United States continues to claim that New Delhi has "committed" to stop importing Russian crude under the US-India trade deal. Here's all you need to know.<h2>Nothing new in Trump's claims</h2>Speaking at her weekly briefing, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said Moscow sees "no reason to believe" that India has shifted its position on buying Russian hydrocarbons."India’s purchase of Russian hydrocarbons benefits both countries and helps maintain stability in the international energy market," she said, according to PTI.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/white-house-releases-first-official-fact-sheet-on-us-india-trade-deal-says-it-ll-open-1-4b-strong-market-to-american-goods-1770701855280">White House releases first official fact sheet on US-India trade deal; no mention of New Delhi ending Russian oil purchase</a>Zakharova also took aim at remarks by US President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who have suggested that India had committed to stopping Russian oil imports as part of broader trade negotiations with Washington."There is nothing new in the claims of US President Donald Trump, as well as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who have grabbed the right to dictate to independent nations," she said.<h2>What sparked the row?</h2>The comments come after a recent phone conversation between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump. Following the call, both sides announced a reduction in US tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from 50 per cent. That move included scrapping a 25 per cent duty imposed by Trump last August over India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/white-house-revises-us-india-trade-deal-fact-sheet-removes-key-references-including-pulses-and-digital-taxes-what-changed-explained-1770781073665">White House revises US-India trade deal fact sheet, removes key references, including pulses and digital taxes: What changed? Explained</a>Soon after, Rubio said India had "committed" to stop importing Russian crude. Trump, while announcing the trade deal, also claimed that Indian PM Modi had promised to end such imports.India, however, has neither confirmed nor publicly denied the claim. Officials in New Delhi have repeatedly stated that "national interests" remain the guiding principle in energy procurement decisions.

Russia has rejected US claims that India will halt Russian oil imports under a trade deal, saying it sees no shift in New Delhi’s position. Moscow dismissed remarks by President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio as baseless.

Russia on Wednesday (Feb 18) vehemently rejected US suggestions that India was preparing to cut back on purchases of Russian oil. Pushing back against claims from Washington that New Delhi has agreed to halt imports of Russian crude, the Russian Foreign Ministry said it had "no reason to believe" that was true. This comes as the United States continues to claim that New Delhi has "committed" to stop importing Russian crude under the US-India trade deal. Here's all you need to know. Nothing new in Trump's claims Speaking at her weekly briefing, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said Moscow sees "no reason to believe" that India has shifted its position on buying Russian hydrocarbons. "India’s purchase of Russian hydrocarbons benefits both countries and helps maintain stability in the international energy market," she said, according to PTI. Also read | White House releases first official fact sheet on US-India trade deal; no mention of New Delhi ending Russian oil purchase Zakharova also took aim at remarks by US President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who have suggested that India had committed to stopping Russian oil imports as part of broader trade negotiations with Washington. "There is nothing new in the claims of US President Donald Trump, as well as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who have grabbed the right to dictate to independent nations," she said. What sparked the row? The comments come after a recent phone conversation between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump. Following the call, both sides announced a reduction in US tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from 50 per cent. That move included scrapping a 25 per cent duty imposed by Trump last August over India’s continued purchases of Russian oil. Also read | White House revises US-India trade deal fact sheet, removes key references, including pulses and digital taxes: What changed? Explained Soon after, Rubio said India had "committed" to stop importing Russian crude. Trump, while announcing the trade deal, also claimed that Indian PM Modi had promised to end such imports. India, however, has neither confirmed nor publicly denied the claim. Officials in New Delhi have repeatedly stated that "national interests" remain the guiding principle in energy procurement decisions.

Russia has rejected US claims that India will halt Russian oil imports under a trade deal, saying it sees no shift in New Delhi’s position. Moscow dismissed remarks by President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio as baseless.

Moscow blasts US claim India will ditch Russian oil, says Trump trying to 'grab right to dictate to independent nations'

The Vatican has formally declined an invitation to join US President Donald Trump’s proposed "Board of Peace," signalling unease over the structure and scope of the new initiative. Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Holy See’s Secretary of State and its top diplomat, confirmed Tuesday (Feb 10) that Pope Leo XIV would not participate in Trump's board touted by the POTUS as a shot at "GREATNESS FOR ALL.". The decision comes after the pontiff was invited last month to take part in the board, which was initially conceived to oversee reconstruction efforts in Gaza but has since expanded into a broader global peace body.<h2>Vatican expresses concern over the UN's role</h2>Speaking to reporters after an event marking the anniversary of the Lateran Pacts, Cardinal Parolin said the Vatican was left "perplexed" by certain elements of the proposal and said that "critical issues" still need to be resolved. He emphasised that crisis management at the international level should remain under the authority of the United Nations.One of the points on which they have insisted, Parolin said, "is that at the international level it should above all be the UN that manages these crisis situations. This is one of the points on which we have insisted".<h2>Board of Peace under Trump's control</h2>The board, chaired indefinitely by Trump, would reportedly allow the president to appoint members, shape the agenda, and oversee finances. That structure has drawn concern from several governments and diplomats who fear it could sideline existing international mechanisms.Britain, France and Norway have also declined invitations, while Italy and the European Union have indicated they may participate only as observers. Meanwhile, war criminal Russian President Vladimir Putin and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, sometimes referred to as 'Europe's last dictator', have been invited to join.<h2>White House pushback</h2>The White House described the Vatican’s decision as "deeply unfortunate," with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt slamming the pontiff's refusal to join the Board of Peace, saying peace efforts should not become "partisan or political."Defending the board as a legitimate international body with broad participation. "This is a legitimate organization where there are tens of member countries from around the world, and we think that’s an unfortunate decision," she said.The board is expected to hold its first meeting in Washington this week.

The Vatican has turned down UD President Donald Trump's invitation for American Pope Leo to join the Gaza Board of Peace. This has led White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt to hit back at the pontiff. Here's the reason behind the Vatican's snub.

The Vatican has formally declined an invitation to join US President Donald Trump’s proposed "Board of Peace," signalling unease over the structure and scope of the new initiative. Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Holy See’s Secretary of State and its top diplomat, confirmed Tuesday (Feb 10) that Pope Leo XIV would not participate in Trump's board touted by the POTUS as a shot at "GREATNESS FOR ALL.". The decision comes after the pontiff was invited last month to take part in the board, which was initially conceived to oversee reconstruction efforts in Gaza but has since expanded into a broader global peace body. Vatican expresses concern over the UN's role Speaking to reporters after an event marking the anniversary of the Lateran Pacts, Cardinal Parolin said the Vatican was left "perplexed" by certain elements of the proposal and said that "critical issues" still need to be resolved. He emphasised that crisis management at the international level should remain under the authority of the United Nations. One of the points on which they have insisted, Parolin said, "is that at the international level it should above all be the UN that manages these crisis situations. This is one of the points on which we have insisted". Board of Peace under Trump's control The board, chaired indefinitely by Trump, would reportedly allow the president to appoint members, shape the agenda, and oversee finances. That structure has drawn concern from several governments and diplomats who fear it could sideline existing international mechanisms. Britain, France and Norway have also declined invitations, while Italy and the European Union have indicated they may participate only as observers. Meanwhile, war criminal Russian President Vladimir Putin and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, sometimes referred to as 'Europe's last dictator', have been invited to join. White House pushback The White House described the Vatican’s decision as "deeply unfortunate," with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt slamming the pontiff's refusal to join the Board of Peace, saying peace efforts should not become "partisan or political." Defending the board as a legitimate international body with broad participation. "This is a legitimate organization where there are tens of member countries from around the world, and we think that’s an unfortunate decision," she said. The board is expected to hold its first meeting in Washington this week.

The Vatican has turned down UD President Donald Trump's invitation for American Pope Leo to join the Gaza Board of Peace. This has led White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt to hit back at the pontiff. Here's the reason behind the Vatican's snub.

Vatican snubs Trump’s Gaza Board of Peace invitation over governance concerns; Leavitt hits back at Pope

A majority of Americans disapprove of President Donald Trump’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, according to recent polls. Public sentiment highlights growing concerns over accountability, transparency, and the political implications surrounding the high-profile case.


Epstein Files: Majority of Americans Disapprove Trump's Handling of Epstein Probe

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump