Iran has announced that all ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz must coordinate with its naval forces before transit, as tensions continue to grip the strategic waterway amid the ongoing US-Iran conflict. The directive comes as maritime traffic remains heavily restricted, raising concerns over global energy security, shipping delays, and rising oil prices.


US-Iran War: Iran Says Ships Must Coordinate Before Passing Through Hormuz

US First Lady Melania Trump, in a public statement on Thursday (Apr 9), denied any meaningful relationship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. She insisted that she "never had" any relationship with the sex offenders and said that she had "no knowledge" of Epstein's criminal activity when they met. However, within hours of her surprise statement, a 2002 email released in the Justice Department's final tranche of Epstein documents was circulating widely online, raising questions about at least one of those claims. Here's a fact check.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION is only reporting the names that have been mentioned in the Epstein files and is not accusing anyone of any wrongdoing. Readers are advised to use their discretion on this article.<h3>What Melania Trump said</h3>The First Lady was unequivocal. "The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today," she said, adding that "fake images and statements" about her and Epstein had been spreading on social media for years. She denied that Epstein had introduced her to Donald Trump and claimed that she met her husband two years before she ever encountered Epstein. Reports suggest that the two met independently in September 1998 at a New York Fashion Week party at the Kit Kat Club in Manhattan, hosted by Paolo Zampolli.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/artemis-ii-astronauts-stuck-pooping-in-special-bags-after-23-million-toilet-gets-clogged-1775713143337">Artemis II: Astronauts stuck using 'special bags' as $23 million toilet gets clogged</a>She also stated she had never been on Epstein's plane, never visited his private island, did not know about his abuse of victims, and was never involved "in any capacity." On Maxwell, she said she had no relationship with her either.Melania did not specify what prompted the statement or which particular allegations she was responding to, though photographs of Donald and Melania Trump alongside Epstein and Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago have circulated for years. She also called on Congress to hold public hearings allowing Epstein's survivors to testify under oath.<h2>Internet fact check's Melania's 'never had' a relationship with Epstein or Maxwell claim</h2>Almost immediately after the statement went public, users online pointed to a document from the Justice Department's Epstein file release: a 2002 email addressed to "Dear G", widely interpreted as Ghislaine Maxwell, with the sender's identity redacted.The email reads: "Dear G! How are you? Nice story about JE in NY mag. You look great on the picture. I know you are very busy flying all over the world. How was Palm Beach? I cannot wait to go down. Give me a call when you are back in NY. Have a great time! Love, Melania."The tone, "dear G," a request to call, and the sign-off "love" struck many as inconsistent with Melania's claim of having no relationship with Maxwell.<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260410/image-1775783790660.png"></figure>It must be noted that the sender's ID in the email is blacked out. It has not been independently verified that the email was sent by Melania Trump rather than some other Melania. No official attribution has been confirmed.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pam-bondi-subpoenaed-house-oversight-committee-forces-trump-s-ag-to-testify-on-doj-s-alleged-epstein-files-cover-up-bipartisan-vote-1772688470568">Pam Bondi subpoenaed: House oversight committee forces Trump's AG to testify on DOJ's alleged Epstein files 'cover-up'</a><h2>A damning second email emerges</h2>A separate email is also making the rounds on X. The email is addressed to Jeffrey Epstein's Gmail account and is dated November 9, 2016, coincidentally the day after Trump's first presidential election victory.&nbsp;&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260410/image-1775783828341.png"></figure>The sender, also redacted, writes about being surprised by the result and then adds: "I remember flying back with Donald on his plane the first weekend I went to visit you in Florida was the weekend he met Melania, and he kept on coming out of the bedroom saying 'wow what a hot piece of ass.'"The email, if authentic, could potentially contradict the account of how Trump and Melania met, though again, the sender's identity is unverified.<h2>So, did Epstein introduce the POTUS and FLOTUS?</h2>If rumours are to be believed, yes. However, for now, Melania insists, "Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump".&nbsp;&nbsp;

Did Melania Trump really have “no relationship” with Epstein or Maxwell? After the FLOTUS denied any links to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, resurfaced emails have sparked fresh questions online. Coincidence, misidentification, or contradiction?

Scroll down for the fact check.

US First Lady Melania Trump, in a public statement on Thursday (Apr 9), denied any meaningful relationship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. She insisted that she "never had" any relationship with the sex offenders and said that she had "no knowledge" of Epstein's criminal activity when they met. However, within hours of her surprise statement, a 2002 email released in the Justice Department's final tranche of Epstein documents was circulating widely online, raising questions about at least one of those claims. Here's a fact check. Disclaimer: WION is only reporting the names that have been mentioned in the Epstein files and is not accusing anyone of any wrongdoing. Readers are advised to use their discretion on this article. What Melania Trump said The First Lady was unequivocal. "The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today," she said, adding that "fake images and statements" about her and Epstein had been spreading on social media for years. She denied that Epstein had introduced her to Donald Trump and claimed that she met her husband two years before she ever encountered Epstein. Reports suggest that the two met independently in September 1998 at a New York Fashion Week party at the Kit Kat Club in Manhattan, hosted by Paolo Zampolli. Also read | Artemis II: Astronauts stuck using 'special bags' as $23 million toilet gets clogged She also stated she had never been on Epstein's plane, never visited his private island, did not know about his abuse of victims, and was never involved "in any capacity." On Maxwell, she said she had no relationship with her either. Melania did not specify what prompted the statement or which particular allegations she was responding to, though photographs of Donald and Melania Trump alongside Epstein and Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago have circulated for years. She also called on Congress to hold public hearings allowing Epstein's survivors to testify under oath. Internet fact check's Melania's 'never had' a relationship with Epstein or Maxwell claim Almost immediately after the statement went public, users online pointed to a document from the Justice Department's Epstein file release: a 2002 email addressed to "Dear G", widely interpreted as Ghislaine Maxwell, with the sender's identity redacted. The email reads: "Dear G! How are you? Nice story about JE in NY mag. You look great on the picture. I know you are very busy flying all over the world. How was Palm Beach? I cannot wait to go down. Give me a call when you are back in NY. Have a great time! Love, Melania." The tone, "dear G," a request to call, and the sign-off "love" struck many as inconsistent with Melania's claim of having no relationship with Maxwell. It must be noted that the sender's ID in the email is blacked out. It has not been independently verified that the email was sent by Melania Trump rather than some other Melania. No official attribution has been confirmed. Also read | Pam Bondi subpoenaed: House oversight committee forces Trump's AG to testify on DOJ's alleged Epstein files 'cover-up' A damning second email emerges A separate email is also making the rounds on X. The email is addressed to Jeffrey Epstein's Gmail account and is dated November 9, 2016, coincidentally the day after Trump's first presidential election victory. The sender, also redacted, writes about being surprised by the result and then adds: "I remember flying back with Donald on his plane the first weekend I went to visit you in Florida was the weekend he met Melania, and he kept on coming out of the bedroom saying 'wow what a hot piece of ass.'" The email, if authentic, could potentially contradict the account of how Trump and Melania met, though again, the sender's identity is unverified. So, did Epstein introduce the POTUS and FLOTUS? If rumours are to be believed, yes. However, for now, Melania insists, "Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump".

Did Melania Trump really have “no relationship” with Epstein or Maxwell? After the FLOTUS denied any links to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, resurfaced emails have sparked fresh questions online. Coincidence, misidentification, or contradiction?Scroll down for the fact check.

'Wow, what a hot piece of a**': Melania Trump denies Epstein and Maxwell ties, but THESE emails complicate that story | FACT CHECK

President Donald Trump on Thursday (April 9) warned that Iran ‘better stop now’ if it is charging fees to oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz. His comments on Truth Social further strained an already fragile ceasefire between the US and Iran, coming less than two days after it was reached. Trump said on Tuesday evening that the US would agree to a two-week suspension of hostilities with the Islamic Republic on the condition that it ensures “the COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz.”&nbsp;However, vessel traffic through the strategic waterway, responsible for roughly 20% of global oil supply, remains heavily restricted, continuing a disruption that began after the war started on February 28. Meanwhile, reports cited by the Financial Times suggest Iran is preparing to impose fees on shipping companies, payable in cryptocurrency, to allow passage through the strait. “There are reports that Iran is charging fees to tankers going through the Hormuz Strait,” Trump wrote in Thursday’s post. “They better not be and, if they are, they better stop now!” he wrote.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-low-iq-stupid-people-and-losers-trump-lashes-out-on-tucker-carlson-megyn-kelly-candace-owens-and-alex-jones-in-truth-social-post-1775768210866">'Low IQ, stupid people and losers': Trump lashes out on Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones in Truth Social post</a>

<h2>Very quickly, oil will start flowing, with or without the help of Iran: Trump</h2>In another Truth Social post, Trump responded to criticism from The Wall Street Journal, rejecting the outlet’s claim that he had ‘declared premature victory in Iran’. “Very quickly, oil will start flowing, with or without Iran’s help,” Trump said, standing by his position that recent developments represent a clear victory. He dismissed the newspaper’s characterisation of his remarks as premature, arguing instead that the outcome is already decided.&nbsp;“Because of me, Iran will never have a nuclear weapon,” he said, adding that oil markets would soon see increased flow regardless of Iran’s participation. Trump also criticised The Wall Street Journal, calling its editorial board consistently inaccurate and overly critical, and suggested the publication often fails to acknowledge when it is wrong.

<h2>That is not the agreement we have: Trump</h2>Trump, in another post, said that Iran is doing a very poor job, dishonorable, some would say, of allowing Oil to go through the Strait of Hormuz. That is not the agreement we have!.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

'They better not be...better stop now': Trump says after Iran charging fees from tankers passing Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump on Thursday (April 9) warned that Iran ‘better stop now’ if it is charging fees to oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz. His comments on Truth Social further strained an already fragile ceasefire between the US and Iran, coming less than two days after it was reached. Trump said on Tuesday evening that the US would agree to a two-week suspension of hostilities with the Islamic Republic on the condition that it ensures “the COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz.” However, vessel traffic through the strategic waterway, responsible for roughly 20% of global oil supply, remains heavily restricted, continuing a disruption that began after the war started on February 28. Meanwhile, reports cited by the Financial Times suggest Iran is preparing to impose fees on shipping companies, payable in cryptocurrency, to allow passage through the strait. “There are reports that Iran is charging fees to tankers going through the Hormuz Strait,” Trump wrote in Thursday’s post. “They better not be and, if they are, they better stop now!” he wrote. Also Read: 'Low IQ, stupid people and losers': Trump lashes out on Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones in Truth Social post

Donald Trump warned Iran over alleged tanker fees in the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions amid a fragile ceasefire and shipping disruptions

US President Donald Trump criticised four media personalities and podcasters who had previously supported him but recently turned against his stance on escalating tensions with Iran and his ceasefire efforts. In a lengthy 485-word post on Truth Social, Trump attacked Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones, calling them ‘low IQ’ and dismissing their shows as ‘third-rate podcasts’. The post was later shared by the White House Rapid Response team on X, amplifying the controversy online.

According to reports, Candace Owens and others have suggested alleged Israeli influence in the unfolding situation. Trump, who recently announced that Iran had agreed to a ceasefire deal, responded directly to the backlash from online commentators and media figures. The reaction sparked further political commentary, including from Trump ally Laura Loomer, who has frequently clashed with many of the same figures on X and reacted to the Rapid Response post with a brief “Finally”.&nbsp;While Owens and Carlson have openly criticised the Iran conflict and US involvement, Alex Jones recently said he felt politically 'homeless', claiming he can no longer align fully with Republicans amid Trump’s recent actions. Below are key excerpts from Trump’s lengthy Truth Social post targeting the commentators.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/melania-trump-denies-epstein-links-in-surprise-white-house-statement-says-lies-need-to-end-today-1775761764597">'I am not his victim': Melania Trump denies Epstein links in surprise White House statement, says 'lies need to end today'</a><h2>5 insults from Donald Trump in Truth Social post</h2>“I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting me for years, especially by the fact that they think it is wonderful for Iran, the Number One State Sponsor of Terror, to have a Nuclear Weapon - Because they have one thing in common, Low IQs. They're stupid people, they know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too!,” Trump said at the start of the message. He continued, "Look at their past, look at their record. They don't have what it takes, and they never did! They've all been thrown off Television, lost their Shows, and aren't even invited on TV because nobody cares about them, they're NUT JOBS, TROUBLEMAKERS, and will say anything necessary for some "free" and cheap publicity. Now they think they get some "clicks" because they have Third Rate Podcasts, but nobody's talking about them, and their views are the opposite of MAGA - Or I wouldn't have won the Presidential Election in a LANDSLIDE. MAGA agrees with me, and just gave CNN a 100% Approval Rating of 'TRUMP'."&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/hungary-offered-iran-intel-on-hezbollah-pager-attack-by-israel-1775755798001/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/hungary-offered-iran-intel-on-hezbollah-pager-attack-by-israel-1775755798001/embed</a><h2>Individual attacks on Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones</h2><ul><li>Speaking of Tucker Carlson, Trump said the former Fox News host could not even ‘finish college’. The president added, “he was a broken man when he got fired from Fox, and he's never been the same. Perhaps he should see a good psychiatrist.”</li><li>Coming to Megyn Kelly, Trump added that she ‘nastily asked me the now famous, ’Only Rosie O'Donnell,' question."</li><li>Trump then turned his attention to Candace Owens and called her ‘crazy’. The president added that Owens “accuses the Highly Respected First Lady of France of being a man, when she is not, and will hopefully win lots of money in the ongoing lawsuit.” Commenting on Owens personal appearance, Trump said: “Actually, to me, the First Lady of France is a far more beautiful woman than Candace, in fact, it's not even close!”</li><li>Of Alex Jones, President Trump said: “Bankrupt Alex Jones, who says some of the dumbest things, and lost his entire fortune, as he should have, for his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, ridiculously claiming it was a hoax.”</li></ul>Addressing them collectively, Trump added that they were 'losers' and not aligned with MAGA. He further said that mainstream outlets were giving them attention for the first time in years due to their criticism of him. Trump finished his post by stressing his focus on national leadership, claiming he is too occupied with global affairs to engage with critics, and reiterated his stance on Iran and national strength.

'Low IQ, stupid people and losers': Trump lashes out on Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones in Truth Social post

US President Donald Trump criticised four media personalities and podcasters who had previously supported him but recently turned against his stance on escalating tensions with Iran and his ceasefire efforts. In a lengthy 485-word post on Truth Social, Trump attacked Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones, calling them ‘low IQ’ and dismissing their shows as ‘third-rate podcasts’. The post was later shared by the White House Rapid Response team on X, amplifying the controversy online.

Donald Trump slams Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones as ‘low IQ losers’, saying they oppose MAGA and wrongly support Iran’s nuclear ambitions

As US‑Iran ceasefire talks continue, one of the main sticking points remains Iran’s demand for the right to uranium enrichment, which Tehran views as a sovereign right and central to long‑term negotiations. The United States, however, insists that nuclear enrichment remains a red line and refuses to accept Tehran’s demand as part of any deal.


US-Iran Ceasefire: Iran Demands Right to Enrichment, US Says it Remains a Red Line

As the United States butts heads with Iran in a conflict that has consumed the world for weeks now, it has been engaged in another conflict with the Vatican. A new report suggests that the Pentagon issued a warning to the church and complained about a speech given by Pope Leo that it believed was an attack on President Donald Trump. The Free Press reported that things have been rocky between the White House and Pope Leo XIV, the first US-born Pope. It states that the Pentagon invited the Holy See ambassador to the US, Cardinal Christophe Pierre, to talk about a speech delivered by the Pope in January this year. Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby complained to Cardinal Pierre and apparently issued a stern warning that the “Church had better take its side." Other officials also invoked the 14th-century Avignon Papacy, during which time the Church was under the control of the French monarchy.&nbsp;“America has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side,” Colby reportedly said, according to Free Press. The officials also mentioned the Avignon Papacy, which was seen as a historical warning of what happens when the Papacy opposes a dominant world power. On January 9, Pope Leo XIV said during an annual address, "a diplomacy that promotes dialogue and seeks consensus among all parties is being replaced by a diplomacy based on force.” It was widely interpreted to be targeted at Trump and his aggressive foreign policy of sanctions and coercion, also being called the Donroe Doctrine. When Trump issued his “wipe out an entire civilization” remark earlier this week, the Pope condemned it as "truly unacceptable". Pope Leo XIV has also often criticised the Trump administration’s "inhuman treatment of immigrants.”<h2>JD Vance reacts to Pentagon's threat to the Vatican report</h2>A public "war of words" has also been going on between Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pope Leo XIV. On March 26, 2026, he led a Pentagon prayer service where he reportedly prayed for "overwhelming violence of action" against adversaries. Pope Leo XIV responded by saying that God "rejects war" and "does not listen to the prayers of those who wage it." Vice President JD Vance was asked about the reported threat to the Vatican, and he has said that he will review the matter. &nbsp;

A report states that the Pentagon threatened the Vatican with military action after Pope Leo XIV said things in a speech that were believed to be targeted at Donald Trump. “Church had better take its side", an official reportedly said.

As the United States butts heads with Iran in a conflict that has consumed the world for weeks now, it has been engaged in another conflict with the Vatican. A new report suggests that the Pentagon issued a warning to the church and complained about a speech given by Pope Leo that it believed was an attack on President Donald Trump. The Free Press reported that things have been rocky between the White House and Pope Leo XIV, the first US-born Pope. It states that the Pentagon invited the Holy See ambassador to the US, Cardinal Christophe Pierre, to talk about a speech delivered by the Pope in January this year. Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby complained to Cardinal Pierre and apparently issued a stern warning that the “Church had better take its side." Other officials also invoked the 14th-century Avignon Papacy, during which time the Church was under the control of the French monarchy. “America has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side,” Colby reportedly said, according to Free Press. The officials also mentioned the Avignon Papacy, which was seen as a historical warning of what happens when the Papacy opposes a dominant world power. On January 9, Pope Leo XIV said during an annual address, "a diplomacy that promotes dialogue and seeks consensus among all parties is being replaced by a diplomacy based on force.” It was widely interpreted to be targeted at Trump and his aggressive foreign policy of sanctions and coercion, also being called the Donroe Doctrine. When Trump issued his “wipe out an entire civilization” remark earlier this week, the Pope condemned it as "truly unacceptable". Pope Leo XIV has also often criticised the Trump administration’s "inhuman treatment of immigrants.” JD Vance reacts to Pentagon's threat to the Vatican report A public "war of words" has also been going on between Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pope Leo XIV. On March 26, 2026, he led a Pentagon prayer service where he reportedly prayed for "overwhelming violence of action" against adversaries. Pope Leo XIV responded by saying that God "rejects war" and "does not listen to the prayers of those who wage it." Vice President JD Vance was asked about the reported threat to the Vatican, and he has said that he will review the matter.

A report states that the Pentagon threatened the Vatican with military action after Pope Leo XIV said things in a speech that were believed to be targeted at Donald Trump. “Church had better take its side", an official reportedly said.

'Church had better take its side': Did Trump officials threaten Vatican? Report claims...

A fresh rift appears to be widening within NATO after Donald Trump sharply criticised several alliance members over defence commitments and burden-sharing. Responding to the remarks, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Trump is “clearly disappointed” with many allies, reflecting growing tensions over military spending and strategic priorities.


Donald Trump Blasts NATO: Rutte Says Trump's 'Clearly Disappointed With Many NATO Allies'

A day after announcing a ceasefire, Donald Trump warned Iran that US forces will remain deployed until a “real agreement” is fully enforced. He stressed no nuclear weapons and an open Strait of Hormuz, cautioning that any violation could trigger a stronger military response.

'All US ships and arms....': Trump issues first warning to Iran after ceasefire, wants 'REAL AGREEMENT' to be followed

A political storm has erupted after Donald Trump warned that “a whole civilisation will die” if Iran failed to meet U.S. demands during the ongoing war. The remark triggered sharp reactions across the political spectrum in Washington, with critics calling the language dangerous and allies offering mixed responses.


US-Iran War: Trump's Threat To End Iran Civilisation Triggers Political Slugfest

Hours after NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte arrived at the White House on Wednesday (Apr 8) for what officials described as a "frank" discussion, US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to blast the alliance. "NATO WASN'T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON'T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN," he wrote. The vital meeting came amid fears that the POTUS' outrage over NATO allies' steadfast refusal to join his war against Iran could prompt him to pull the United States out of the nearly eight-decade-old alliance.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-s-10-point-plan-explained-compensation-sanctions-hormuz-and-more-here-s-what-tehran-wants-after-2-week-ceasefire-deal-1775620008012">Iran’s 10-point plan EXPLAINED: Compensation, sanctions, Hormuz and more, here's what Tehran wants after 2-week ceasefire deal</a><h2>'NATO WASN'T THERE'</h2>In his signature all-caps post on Truth Social, Trump slammed the alliance and wrote, "NATO WASN'T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON'T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN," he wrote. Then, with no further context: "REMEMBER GREENLAND, THAT BIG, POORLY RUN, PIECE OF ICE!!!"Before the Iran war took over headlines, Trump's designs on the Danish Arctic territory had been NATO's most pressing headache. Its sudden reappearance — unprompted, the day after a fragile US-Iran ceasefire — was a reminder that the Greenland ambition never really went away.In recent days, Trump has been openly contemptuous of NATO's response to the Iran war, calling the alliance a "paper tiger" for refusing to take a leading role in reopening the Strait of Hormuz and for limiting American forces' use of bases on allied territory. He also mounted personal attacks against UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, comparing him to Winston Churchill and dismissing Britain's aircraft carriers as "toys."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-ghost-murmur-how-the-cia-used-secret-futuristic-tech-to-rescue-downed-us-f-15e-pilot-dude-44-bravo-amid-iran-war-1775647718461">'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war</a><h2>Will the US exit NATO?</h2>The meeting itself produced no public resolution on the question everyone came to answer: whether Trump is seriously considering pulling the United States out of NATO. However, a NATO spokesperson, in a statement on X, said that the Rutte and Trump "had a frank discussion on a range of issues related to our shared security, including in the context of Iran.""The Secretary General underscored the importance of Allies continuing to step up to deliver a stronger, fairer Alliance," added the spokesperson.Before the meeting, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that withdrawal was "something the president has discussed" and would be discussing with the NATO Secretary General. Rutte, the former Dutch prime minister, has built a reputation for managing Trump through a combination of flattery and strategic patience. Last year, he made headlines for calling Trump "daddy" at a summit.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Is the US on the verge of walking away from NATO? Hours after meeting Mark Rutte, Donald Trump blasted the alliance, calling it unreliable and reviving old tensions.

Is this just pressure tactics or a real exit threat? Scroll down to read more.

Hours after NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte arrived at the White House on Wednesday (Apr 8) for what officials described as a "frank" discussion, US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to blast the alliance. "NATO WASN'T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON'T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN," he wrote. The vital meeting came amid fears that the POTUS' outrage over NATO allies' steadfast refusal to join his war against Iran could prompt him to pull the United States out of the nearly eight-decade-old alliance. Also read | Iran’s 10-point plan EXPLAINED: Compensation, sanctions, Hormuz and more, here's what Tehran wants after 2-week ceasefire deal 'NATO WASN'T THERE' In his signature all-caps post on Truth Social, Trump slammed the alliance and wrote, "NATO WASN'T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON'T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN," he wrote. Then, with no further context: "REMEMBER GREENLAND, THAT BIG, POORLY RUN, PIECE OF ICE!!!" Before the Iran war took over headlines, Trump's designs on the Danish Arctic territory had been NATO's most pressing headache. Its sudden reappearance — unprompted, the day after a fragile US-Iran ceasefire — was a reminder that the Greenland ambition never really went away. In recent days, Trump has been openly contemptuous of NATO's response to the Iran war, calling the alliance a "paper tiger" for refusing to take a leading role in reopening the Strait of Hormuz and for limiting American forces' use of bases on allied territory. He also mounted personal attacks against UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, comparing him to Winston Churchill and dismissing Britain's aircraft carriers as "toys." Also read | 'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war Will the US exit NATO? The meeting itself produced no public resolution on the question everyone came to answer: whether Trump is seriously considering pulling the United States out of NATO. However, a NATO spokesperson, in a statement on X, said that the Rutte and Trump "had a frank discussion on a range of issues related to our shared security, including in the context of Iran." "The Secretary General underscored the importance of Allies continuing to step up to deliver a stronger, fairer Alliance," added the spokesperson. Before the meeting, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that withdrawal was "something the president has discussed" and would be discussing with the NATO Secretary General. Rutte, the former Dutch prime minister, has built a reputation for managing Trump through a combination of flattery and strategic patience. Last year, he made headlines for calling Trump "daddy" at a summit. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Is the US on the verge of walking away from NATO? Hours after meeting Mark Rutte, Donald Trump blasted the alliance, calling it unreliable and reviving old tensions.Is this just pressure tactics or a real exit threat? Scroll down to read more.

'REMEMBER THAT BIG, POORLY RUN, PIECE OF ICE...': Trump blasts NATO after closed-door meeting with Rutte, revives Greenland threat

IN PICS | All the times Donald Trump vowed to resolve a crisis in ‘two-three weeks’

IN PICS | All the times Donald Trump vowed to resolve global crisis in ‘two-three weeks’

US President Donald Trump has launched a sharp attack on CNN, accusing the broadcaster of spreading a “false and dangerous” report about Iran’s alleged declaration of victory, even as delicate ceasefire efforts continue to unfold. The dispute erupted after Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran, just ahead of a deadline he had set for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy route that carries nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil shipments.<h3>Trump accuses CNN of spreading misinformation</h3>In a series of posts on Truth Social, Trump accused CNN of deliberately amplifying a fabricated statement purportedly from senior Iranian officials. “No one can believe that Fake News CNN put out a knowingly false and dangerous statement pretending it came from the upper levels of the Iranian Government. It didn’t,” Trump said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-launches-largest-wave-of-strikes-against-hezbollah-in-lebanon-high-casualties-reported-1775659940742">Israel launches largest wave of strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon; high casualties reported</a>&nbsp;He further alleged that the report originated from what he described as a fraudulent news source based in Nigeria, and claimed CNN had irresponsibly elevated it into a headline during a sensitive geopolitical moment.&nbsp;“It was totally made up and posted, as a headline, for purpose of, perhaps, inflaming a very delicate situation,” he added. Trump also called for an immediate retraction and apology, stating that authorities were examining whether any criminal wrongdoing was involved in the dissemination of the report.<h2>Contested report on Iran’s ‘victory’</h2>The controversy centres on a CNN report that cited a statement attributed to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, claiming that Tehran had achieved a decisive outcome.&nbsp;According to the report, the statement said the “enemy” had suffered a “historic and crushing defeat” in what it described as an unlawful war against the Iranian nation.A White House-affiliated account amplified the issue by sharing a screenshot of the CNN headline, which read that Iran claimed victory and forced the United States to accept a ten-point plan.<h2>CNN defends its reporting</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-amazon-cutting-14-000-jobs-company-break-silence-to-viral-layoff-rumours-1775656661914">Is Amazon cutting 14,000 jobs? Company break silence to viral layoff rumours</a>&nbsp;CNN has rejected Trump’s accusations, maintaining that its reporting was based on credible and verified sources. A network spokesperson said the statement had been obtained directly from Iranian officials and was also carried by multiple Iranian state media outlets.&nbsp;Senior international correspondent Matthew Chance reinforced that position during an appearance with Anderson Cooper, saying the document had been independently confirmed.&nbsp;“When President Trump posted on Truth Social that he objected to that report, he said it was fake. I followed up with the Iranian foreign ministry,” Chance said, noting that officials provided the same document again upon request.&nbsp;“And so I think we’re pretty confident, very confident that this document is authentic,” he added, according to Deadline.<h2>Tensions persist amid ceasefire diplomacy</h2>The media clash comes at a critical juncture, with diplomatic efforts ongoing to stabilise relations following heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran.&nbsp;While the ceasefire has offered a temporary pause, the dispute between the White House and CNN highlights the fragile information environment surrounding the conflict, where competing narratives continue to shape public perception and political responses.

President Trump demanded an apology from CNN, labelling their report on Iran’s "victory" claim as dangerous misinformation. CNN stands by its sourcing, affirming the document was verified directly through Iranian officials.

US President Donald Trump has launched a sharp attack on CNN, accusing the broadcaster of spreading a “false and dangerous” report about Iran’s alleged declaration of victory, even as delicate ceasefire efforts continue to unfold. The dispute erupted after Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran, just ahead of a deadline he had set for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy route that carries nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil shipments. Trump accuses CNN of spreading misinformation In a series of posts on Truth Social, Trump accused CNN of deliberately amplifying a fabricated statement purportedly from senior Iranian officials. “No one can believe that Fake News CNN put out a knowingly false and dangerous statement pretending it came from the upper levels of the Iranian Government. It didn’t,” Trump said. Also read: Israel launches largest wave of strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon; high casualties reported He further alleged that the report originated from what he described as a fraudulent news source based in Nigeria, and claimed CNN had irresponsibly elevated it into a headline during a sensitive geopolitical moment. “It was totally made up and posted, as a headline, for purpose of, perhaps, inflaming a very delicate situation,” he added. Trump also called for an immediate retraction and apology, stating that authorities were examining whether any criminal wrongdoing was involved in the dissemination of the report. Contested report on Iran’s ‘victory’ The controversy centres on a CNN report that cited a statement attributed to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, claiming that Tehran had achieved a decisive outcome. According to the report, the statement said the “enemy” had suffered a “historic and crushing defeat” in what it described as an unlawful war against the Iranian nation. A White House-affiliated account amplified the issue by sharing a screenshot of the CNN headline, which read that Iran claimed victory and forced the United States to accept a ten-point plan. CNN defends its reporting Also read: Is Amazon cutting 14,000 jobs? Company break silence to viral layoff rumours CNN has rejected Trump’s accusations, maintaining that its reporting was based on credible and verified sources. A network spokesperson said the statement had been obtained directly from Iranian officials and was also carried by multiple Iranian state media outlets. Senior international correspondent Matthew Chance reinforced that position during an appearance with Anderson Cooper, saying the document had been independently confirmed. “When President Trump posted on Truth Social that he objected to that report, he said it was fake. I followed up with the Iranian foreign ministry,” Chance said, noting that officials provided the same document again upon request. “And so I think we’re pretty confident, very confident that this document is authentic,” he added, according to Deadline. Tensions persist amid ceasefire diplomacy The media clash comes at a critical juncture, with diplomatic efforts ongoing to stabilise relations following heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran. While the ceasefire has offered a temporary pause, the dispute between the White House and CNN highlights the fragile information environment surrounding the conflict, where competing narratives continue to shape public perception and political responses.

President Trump demanded an apology from CNN, labelling their report on Iran’s "victory" claim as dangerous misinformation. CNN stands by its sourcing, affirming the document was verified directly through Iranian officials.

Trump demands apology from CNN over Iran ‘victory’ report, calls coverage false

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday warned that any country supplying military weapons to Iran will face immediate 50 per cent tariffs with no exemptions. His announcement came in a social media post days after agreeing to a two-week ceasefire with Tehran, according to Reuters. "A Country supplying Military Weapons to Iran will be immediately tariffed, on any and all goods sold to the United States of America, 50%, effective immediately," the US President wrote in a post on Truth Social.

In a separate post, Trump stated that the United States will “work closely” with Iran following what he called it as a “very productive regime change," and also claimed that there would be no further advancement of uranium in Iran. "The United States will work closely with Iran, which we have determined has gone through what will be a very productive Regime Change! There will be no enrichment of Uranium, and the United States will, working with Iran, dig up and remove all of the deeply buried (B-2 Bombers) Nuclear “Dust.” It is now, and has been, under very exacting Satellite Surveillance (Space Force!). Nothing has been touched since the date of the attack. We are, and will be, talking Tariff and Sanctions relief with Iran. Many of the 15 points have already been agreed to," Trump posted on Truth Social.<h3>US-Iran ceasefire</h3>The ceasefire was announced about 90 minutes before the 8 pm EST deadline set by Donald Trump for Iran to reach an agreement, following behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts. In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday (local time), Trump said he would pause further escalation for two weeks if Iran agreed to reopen the key shipping route.&nbsp;“The reason for doing so is that we have already met and exceeded all Military objectives, and are very far along with a definitive Agreement concerning long-term peace with Iran, and peace in the Middle East,” Trump wrote.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/deadlines-destruction-and-diplomacy-a-timeline-of-us-israel-iran-war-1775649800942">Deadlines, destruction and diplomacy: A timeline of US-Israel-Iran war</a>

Trump's tariff threat came the day after the ceasefire was announced, about 90 minutes before the 8 pm EST deadline set by Donald Trump for Iran to reach an agreement, following behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday warned that any country supplying military weapons to Iran will face immediate 50 per cent tariffs with no exemptions. His announcement came in a social media post days after agreeing to a two-week ceasefire with Tehran, according to Reuters. "A Country supplying Military Weapons to Iran will be immediately tariffed, on any and all goods sold to the United States of America, 50%, effective immediately," the US President wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Trump's tariff threat came the day after the ceasefire was announced, about 90 minutes before the 8 pm EST deadline set by Donald Trump for Iran to reach an agreement, following behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts.

Donald Trump warns 50% tariffs on nations supplying weapons to Iran

‘Ghost Murmur’: Here's how a classified futuristic tool no one knew existed brought an American pilot home from the Iranian desert. All you need to know.

'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war

A stark warning by US President Donald Trump that “a whole civilisation will die tonight” has ignited a political firestorm in Washington, prompting fresh calls from Democrats to remove him from office, even as the United States and Iran later announced a two-week ceasefire.&nbsp;The remark, posted on Truth Social on Tuesday morning, raised fears of nuclear escalation and came just hours before a deadline set by Trump for Tehran to agree to a deal and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil route.&nbsp;Leading Democrats reacted swiftly and sharply. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez described the statement as “a threat of genocide”, adding on X that it “merits removal from office” and warning that the President’s “mental faculties are collapsing”. She also urged officials in the chain of command to refuse any illegal orders.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-war-multibillion-dollar-heist-how-states-companies-and-speculators-cashed-in-on-uncertainty-and-trump-flip-flops-iran-israel-ceasefire-truce-1775640136570">Iran war, the multibillion-dollar heist: How states, companies and speculators cashed in on uncertainty and Trump flip-flops</a>&nbsp;Despite the subsequent ceasefire announcement, criticism continued unabated. Representative Melanie Stansbury said the temporary pause did not mitigate the seriousness of the threat, writing that invoking the 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution should still be considered.&nbsp;Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer struck a more measured tone, saying he was “glad Trump backed off” but suggested the President was now “searching for any sort of exit ramp from his ridiculous bluster”.&nbsp;Impeachment push gathers pace&nbsp;The controversy has added momentum to an impeachment effort already underway. On April 5, Representative John Larson introduced articles of impeachment, accusing Trump of “serial usurpation of the congressional war power” and alleging involvement in “murder, war crimes and piracy”.&nbsp;Representative Ilhan Omar also backed removal, questioning when Republican lawmakers would act. Meanwhile, Representative Ro Khanna called for invoking Section 4 of the 25th Amendment, warning that Trump was “threatening the entire destruction of a civilisation”.&nbsp;Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Trump should be removed “one way or another”, urging the Cabinet to act or Congress to reconvene to end the crisis.&nbsp;White House rejects criticism&nbsp;The White House dismissed the backlash as politically motivated. Spokesperson Davis Ingle said Democrats had been calling for Trump’s impeachment “since before he was even sworn into office” and insisted the President was pursuing an agenda backed by millions of voters.&nbsp;Republican unease surfaces&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-cnn-iran-10-point-plan-fake-news-ceasefire-row-1775640317476">Trump slams CNN over Iran ‘10-point plan’ report, calls it fake and inflammatory</a>&nbsp;Although most Republicans avoided direct confrontation, a number expressed concern over the President’s rhetoric. Senator Lisa Murkowski said the statement could not be justified as negotiation tactics and described it as “an affront to the ideals our nation has sought to uphold”.&nbsp;Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene broke ranks more forcefully, calling the remarks “evil and madness” and supporting the use of the 25th Amendment, adding, “We cannot kill an entire civilisation.”&nbsp;Senator Ron Johnson said he hoped Trump’s words were merely “bluster”, stressing that the United States was not at war with the Iranian people. Representative Nathaniel Moran similarly distanced himself, saying he did not support the destruction of a “whole civilisation”.

President Trump sparked an impeachment storm after posting that "a whole civilisation will die tonight." Despite a subsequent Iran ceasefire, Democrats and some Republicans are now calling for his removal.

A stark warning by US President Donald Trump that “a whole civilisation will die tonight” has ignited a political firestorm in Washington, prompting fresh calls from Democrats to remove him from office, even as the United States and Iran later announced a two-week ceasefire. The remark, posted on Truth Social on Tuesday morning, raised fears of nuclear escalation and came just hours before a deadline set by Trump for Tehran to agree to a deal and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil route. Leading Democrats reacted swiftly and sharply. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez described the statement as “a threat of genocide”, adding on X that it “merits removal from office” and warning that the President’s “mental faculties are collapsing”. She also urged officials in the chain of command to refuse any illegal orders. Also read: Iran war, the multibillion-dollar heist: How states, companies and speculators cashed in on uncertainty and Trump flip-flops Despite the subsequent ceasefire announcement, criticism continued unabated. Representative Melanie Stansbury said the temporary pause did not mitigate the seriousness of the threat, writing that invoking the 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution should still be considered. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer struck a more measured tone, saying he was “glad Trump backed off” but suggested the President was now “searching for any sort of exit ramp from his ridiculous bluster”. Impeachment push gathers pace The controversy has added momentum to an impeachment effort already underway. On April 5, Representative John Larson introduced articles of impeachment, accusing Trump of “serial usurpation of the congressional war power” and alleging involvement in “murder, war crimes and piracy”. Representative Ilhan Omar also backed removal, questioning when Republican lawmakers would act. Meanwhile, Representative Ro Khanna called for invoking Section 4 of the 25th Amendment, warning that Trump was “threatening the entire destruction of a civilisation”. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Trump should be removed “one way or another”, urging the Cabinet to act or Congress to reconvene to end the crisis. White House rejects criticism The White House dismissed the backlash as politically motivated. Spokesperson Davis Ingle said Democrats had been calling for Trump’s impeachment “since before he was even sworn into office” and insisted the President was pursuing an agenda backed by millions of voters. Republican unease surfaces Also read:Trump slams CNN over Iran ‘10-point plan’ report, calls it fake and inflammatory Although most Republicans avoided direct confrontation, a number expressed concern over the President’s rhetoric. Senator Lisa Murkowski said the statement could not be justified as negotiation tactics and described it as “an affront to the ideals our nation has sought to uphold”. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene broke ranks more forcefully, calling the remarks “evil and madness” and supporting the use of the 25th Amendment, adding, “We cannot kill an entire civilisation.” Senator Ron Johnson said he hoped Trump’s words were merely “bluster”, stressing that the United States was not at war with the Iranian people. Representative Nathaniel Moran similarly distanced himself, saying he did not support the destruction of a “whole civilisation”.

President Trump sparked an impeachment storm after posting that "a whole civilisation will die tonight." Despite a subsequent Iran ceasefire, Democrats and some Republicans are now calling for his removal.

Regime fall in US? Trump’s ‘whole civilisation will die tonight’ remark sparks impeachment storm. Here’s what we know

US President Donald Trump has reacted sharply to a CNN report attributed to Iranian state media that the US will accept Iran's 10-point plan. Trump, just after claiming “Total and complete victory. 100 per cent”, lashed out at CNN, calling it a “fake news” and knowingly put out a “false and dangerous statement” claiming it was coming from the upper echelon of the US authority, he said it was a “very dangerous thing to do”. He further derided CNN for reporting a statement from Iran Supreme National Security Council that claimed victory. Trump called the post “fraud”."Iran says it has achieved a great victory and forced the United States to accept its 10-point plan, according to a statement from Iran's Supreme National Security Council report by Iranian state media," read the post.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-vs-obama-iran-deal-war-ceasefire-comparison-1775632803667">Trump vs Obama on Iran: From costly war to ceasefire, who got the better deal?</a>In response, US President Donald Trump lashed out at Iran in his Truth Social Post, “The alleged Statement put out by CNN World News is a FRAUD, as CNN well knows. The false Statement was linked to a Fake News site (from Nigeria) and, of course, immediately picked up by CNN, and blared out as a 'legitimate' headline.” He added that the post was “inflammatory” and tries to disrupt the “delicate” balance of the ceasefire. He ordered the network to immediately withdraw the statement and suggested that an investigation would be carried out. "Results of the investigation will be announced in the near future," said Trump.CNN, however, rejected the allegations and claimed that it received information from verified sources. “We received the statement from specific official Iranian spokespeople who are known to us," said the network in response.&nbsp;Trump described the arrangement as a success, but did not comment if he intends to carry out his prior threats. “You’re going to have to see,” Trump told AFP.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Donald Trump lashes out at CNN for reporting Iran’s claim that the US accepted a 10-point plan. The controversy unfolds amid a delicate US-Iran ceasefire.

US President Donald Trump has reacted sharply to a CNN report attributed to Iranian state media that the US will accept Iran's 10-point plan. Trump, just after claiming “Total and complete victory. 100 per cent”, lashed out at CNN, calling it a “fake news” and knowingly put out a “false and dangerous statement” claiming it was coming from the upper echelon of the US authority, he said it was a “very dangerous thing to do”. He further derided CNN for reporting a statement from Iran Supreme National Security Council that claimed victory. Trump called the post “fraud”. "Iran says it has achieved a great victory and forced the United States to accept its 10-point plan, according to a statement from Iran's Supreme National Security Council report by Iranian state media," read the post. Also Read: Trump vs Obama on Iran: From costly war to ceasefire, who got the better deal? In response, US President Donald Trump lashed out at Iran in his Truth Social Post, “The alleged Statement put out by CNN World News is a FRAUD, as CNN well knows. The false Statement was linked to a Fake News site (from Nigeria) and, of course, immediately picked up by CNN, and blared out as a 'legitimate' headline.” He added that the post was “inflammatory” and tries to disrupt the “delicate” balance of the ceasefire. He ordered the network to immediately withdraw the statement and suggested that an investigation would be carried out. "Results of the investigation will be announced in the near future," said Trump. CNN, however, rejected the allegations and claimed that it received information from verified sources. “We received the statement from specific official Iranian spokespeople who are known to us," said the network in response. Trump described the arrangement as a success, but did not comment if he intends to carry out his prior threats. “You’re going to have to see,” Trump told AFP.

Donald Trump lashes out at CNN for reporting Iran’s claim that the US accepted a 10-point plan. The controversy unfolds amid a delicate US-Iran ceasefire.

Trump slams CNN over Iran ‘10-point plan’ report, calls it fake and inflammatory

US President Donald Trump agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The US-Israeli coalition, which started with the premise of regime change and halting nuclear enrichment of Iran, has resulted in the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. Israel, on the other hand, has come out as a winner and achieved the opportunity of carrying out its expansionist project in Lebanon and the West Bank.&nbsp;The 39-day campaign had an estimated cost of $27 billion- $31 billion, according to Penn Wharton Budget Model, and resulted in the death of 15 US servicemen, and roughly 700 others were injured. The cost excludes the damage to the US assets in the region. It also resulted in the death of several Iranian top leaders, including the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 1900 Iranian civilians and tens of thousands of other were also injured. Iran retalliated with closing the Strait of Hormuz, choking the lifeblood of the US empire and sending shockwaves globally.&nbsp;<h2>Trump vs Obama: Who got the better deal with Iran?</h2>&nbsp;Donald Trump, the famous author of the book “Art of the Deal”, once claimed that Obama would start a war with Iran because he’s “weak and he’s ineffective,” and has “absolutely no ability to negotiate.” Obama signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), along with China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States. The deal imposed restrictions on Iran's civilian uranium enrichment in exchange for billions of dollars in sanctions relief. This was done without wasting a single penny and costing no civilian or military deaths. &nbsp;US President Donald Trump walked out of the JCPOA, calling it a “horrible” and one-sided deal. However, after walking out of the JCPOA in 2018 and waging an offensive campaign from February 28, 2026, to April 7, 2026, and spending billions of dollar Trump was desperate to agree to a 10-point ceasefire proposal to salvage his and the GOP's deteriorating political future. The ceasefire proposal shows that Iran was negotiating from a position of strength. Iran agreed to open the Strait of Hormuz, but in coordination with the Iranian military. The US would be lifting all primary and secondary sanctions on Iran. Iran urged acceptance of Uranium enrichment and no IAEA oversight. Further, the US would cease all aggression, withdraw all troops from the region and agree to pay compensation. The proposal, even though not binding yet, puts the US at a disadvantageous position. If agreed, it will convert the US from an empire to a mere regional power.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-ceasefire-trump-threat-pakistan-mediation-hormuz-1775625435970">From Trump’s ultimatum to Sharif’s plea: How US and Iran reached a two-week ceasefire</a>Domestically in the US, there are intense debate between the Democrats and Republicans over who had better deals with Iran. &nbsp;Democrats have called Trump's handling of Iran an impeachable offence and raised concern about Trump's mental health to continue in office after he claimed that the Iranians want to be bombed. Both parties approached US foreign policy differently; on one hand, Barack Obama had a diplomatic approach, and on the other hand, Donald Trump had a “maximum pressure” approach. In the process, Trump managed to isloate US globally; it lost its European allies, who were earlier very efficient in covering the US aggression in the Gulf as a war for Western democratic values. The result is not only a botched-up military campaign but a total and absolute loss of moral legitimacy.&nbsp;

Trump’s Iran war ending in a ceasefire has sparked fresh comparisons with Obama’s JCPOA deal. Who handled Iran better—costly military pressure or diplomatic engagement?

US President Donald Trump agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The US-Israeli coalition, which started with the premise of regime change and halting nuclear enrichment of Iran, has resulted in the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. Israel, on the other hand, has come out as a winner and achieved the opportunity of carrying out its expansionist project in Lebanon and the West Bank. The 39-day campaign had an estimated cost of $27 billion- $31 billion, according to Penn Wharton Budget Model, and resulted in the death of 15 US servicemen, and roughly 700 others were injured. The cost excludes the damage to the US assets in the region. It also resulted in the death of several Iranian top leaders, including the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 1900 Iranian civilians and tens of thousands of other were also injured. Iran retalliated with closing the Strait of Hormuz, choking the lifeblood of the US empire and sending shockwaves globally. Trump vs Obama: Who got the better deal with Iran? Donald Trump, the famous author of the book “Art of the Deal”, once claimed that Obama would start a war with Iran because he’s “weak and he’s ineffective,” and has “absolutely no ability to negotiate.” Obama signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), along with China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States. The deal imposed restrictions on Iran's civilian uranium enrichment in exchange for billions of dollars in sanctions relief. This was done without wasting a single penny and costing no civilian or military deaths. US President Donald Trump walked out of the JCPOA, calling it a “horrible” and one-sided deal. However, after walking out of the JCPOA in 2018 and waging an offensive campaign from February 28, 2026, to April 7, 2026, and spending billions of dollar Trump was desperate to agree to a 10-point ceasefire proposal to salvage his and the GOP's deteriorating political future. The ceasefire proposal shows that Iran was negotiating from a position of strength. Iran agreed to open the Strait of Hormuz, but in coordination with the Iranian military. The US would be lifting all primary and secondary sanctions on Iran. Iran urged acceptance of Uranium enrichment and no IAEA oversight. Further, the US would cease all aggression, withdraw all troops from the region and agree to pay compensation. The proposal, even though not binding yet, puts the US at a disadvantageous position. If agreed, it will convert the US from an empire to a mere regional power. Also Read: From Trump’s ultimatum to Sharif’s plea: How US and Iran reached a two-week ceasefire Domestically in the US, there are intense debate between the Democrats and Republicans over who had better deals with Iran. Democrats have called Trump's handling of Iran an impeachable offence and raised concern about Trump's mental health to continue in office after he claimed that the Iranians want to be bombed. Both parties approached US foreign policy differently; on one hand, Barack Obama had a diplomatic approach, and on the other hand, Donald Trump had a “maximum pressure” approach. In the process, Trump managed to isloate US globally; it lost its European allies, who were earlier very efficient in covering the US aggression in the Gulf as a war for Western democratic values. The result is not only a botched-up military campaign but a total and absolute loss of moral legitimacy.

Trump’s Iran war ending in a ceasefire has sparked fresh comparisons with Obama’s JCPOA deal. Who handled Iran better—costly military pressure or diplomatic engagement?

Trump vs Obama on Iran: From costly war to ceasefire, who got the better deal?

US President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement agency has been involved in yet another violent incident, raising the total number of people shot by its federal agents this year to eight. According to reports, on Tuesday (Apr 7), Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents shot a man in Patterson, a rural agricultural town in California’s Central Valley. The man, identified as Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez, as per ICE, is allegedly a member of the Los Angeles 18th Street gang. Dashcam footage shows the moment Hernandez reportedly "weaponised" his sedan, pinning agents before they opened fire in "defensive shots." Here's all you need to know.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/oil-lifeline-back-tehran-reopens-strait-of-hormuz-for-2-weeks-as-us-iran-agree-to-11th-hour-truce-1775608923236">Oil lifeline back? Tehran reopens Strait of Hormuz for 2 weeks as US-Iran agree to 11th-hour truce</a><h2>What did Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez do?</h2>Confirming the California man's identity, ICE director Todd Lyons described him as an “illegal alien” and member of the Los Angeles 18th Street gang. He alleged that Hernandez was wanted for questioning in El Salvador in connection with a murder. However, Lyons offered no supporting evidence for either claim, and the details of the Salvadoran investigation remain unclear.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">“On April 7, 2026, ICE officers were conducting a targeted vehicle stop in Patterson, CA to arrest Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez, an 18th Street Gang member wanted in El Salvador for questioning in connection to a murder. As officers approached the car, the wanted gang member… <a href="https://t.co/JbkIuQAba5">https://t.co/JbkIuQAba5</a>&mdash; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (@ICEgov) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICEgov/status/2041606332483301662?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 7, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What happened in California?</h2>Hernandez was taken to the hospital after being shot by ICE agents during a traffic stop. According to Lyons,&nbsp; agents moved in to arrest Hernandez during a vehicle stop when he allegedly "weaponised his vehicle in an attempt to run an officer over." Agents then fired what Lyons called "defensive shots to protect themselves, their fellow agents, and the public." The number of shots fired has not been disclosed.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-s-10-point-plan-explained-compensation-sanctions-hormuz-and-more-here-s-what-tehran-wants-after-2-week-ceasefire-deal-1775620008012">Iran’s 10-point plan EXPLAINED: What Tehran wants after 2-week ceasefire deal</a><h2>Video of ICE violence emerges</h2>Dashcam footage obtained by Sacramento NBC affiliate KCRA-TV shows three ICE agents flanking a black sedan pinned between two vehicles with emergency lights flashing. In the silent video, agents appear to reach into the car, which then reverses with the passenger door open, the door clipping the vehicle behind it. The sedan then lurches forward toward the officers before veering left across the median and out of frame. Weapons appear drawn throughout.Watch the video here:&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨 BREAKING: Dashcam footage just dropped of the Patterson, California shooting. Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez weaponized his vehicle and drove straight at ICE agents on the other side of the road. You can clearly see two agents, one hanging out the window, as Hernandez ignores… <a href="https://t.co/94kbPLiVAi">pic.twitter.com/94kbPLiVAi</a>&mdash; Kim &quot;Katie&quot; USA (@KimKatieUSA) <a href="https://twitter.com/KimKatieUSA/status/2041604578832216434?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 7, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The sheriff's office confirmed no local law enforcement was involved in the shooting. The FBI's Sacramento field office said an investigation was underway. California Governor Gavin Newsom said he had been briefed and that he expected federal agents to "appropriately collaborate with state and local law enforcement" during the inquiry.The shooting is the latest in a string of use-of-force incidents involving ICE. At least eight people have been shot by immigration agents so far in 2026, as the Trump administration has dramatically expanded enforcement operations nationwide.

Why are ICE shootings rising across the US this year? A California encounter has become the eighth such incident in 2026, after agents shot a man they say tried to ram officers with his car.

What really happened in that tense standoff? Watch video

US President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement agency has been involved in yet another violent incident, raising the total number of people shot by its federal agents this year to eight. According to reports, on Tuesday (Apr 7), Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents shot a man in Patterson, a rural agricultural town in California’s Central Valley. The man, identified as Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez, as per ICE, is allegedly a member of the Los Angeles 18th Street gang. Dashcam footage shows the moment Hernandez reportedly "weaponised" his sedan, pinning agents before they opened fire in "defensive shots." Here's all you need to know. Also read | Oil lifeline back? Tehran reopens Strait of Hormuz for 2 weeks as US-Iran agree to 11th-hour truce What did Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez do? Confirming the California man's identity, ICE director Todd Lyons described him as an “illegal alien” and member of the Los Angeles 18th Street gang. He alleged that Hernandez was wanted for questioning in El Salvador in connection with a murder. However, Lyons offered no supporting evidence for either claim, and the details of the Salvadoran investigation remain unclear.

Why are ICE shootings rising across the US this year? A California encounter has become the eighth such incident in 2026, after agents shot a man they say tried to ram officers with his car.What really happened in that tense standoff? Watch video

WATCH: Dashcam footage shows federal agents firing at alleged gang member in California; 8th ICE shooting this year

At a press conference, a reporter asked Donald Trump about his mental state, leading him to spiral and say things that further raised questions about his capability to lead the United States. The 79-year-old has been raining constant threats on Iran, which have been flagged as unsuitable for a President. Earlier this week, he told Iran, "Open the F--kin’ Strait, you crazy bastards" in a rant on Truth Social. Using expletives to handle a delicate situation, a war that the US and Israel started, led to concerns about Trump and his ability to do the job. A journalist questioned Trump about it outright. "Yesterday on your Truth Social, you called the Iranians ‘crazy bastards.’” Trump replied, "True." The reporter goes on to ask, “What is your response to critics who say that,” and was cut off by Trump, who said, “I don’t care about critics.”&nbsp;The reporter continued, irrespective of what Trump said, and asked, “What is your response to critics who say that it is your mental health that should perhaps be examined as this war continues?” To this, Trump openly answered, "Well, I haven’t heard that. But if that’s the case, you’re gonna have to have more people like me, because our country was being ripped off, on trade, on mil … on everything, for many years until I came along. So if that’s the case, you’re gonna have to have more people."Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/stephen-king-says-i-predicted-someone-like-trump-in-a-1979-book-he-is-deeply-unwell-1775627013399">Stephen King says, 'I predicted someone like Trump' in a 1979 book: ‘He is deeply unwell’</a>Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-you-shouldn-t-talk-every-day-macron-takes-a-jibe-at-trump-s-wildly-inconsistent-messaging-on-iran-war-1775200931827">'You shouldn't talk every day': Macron takes a jibe at Trump's wildly inconsistent messaging on Iran war</a>&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">REPORTER: &quot;You called the Iranians &#39;crazy bastards.&#39; What is your response to critics who say–&quot; TRUMP: &quot;I don&#39;t care about critics.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/yyvhU4v26R">pic.twitter.com/yyvhU4v26R</a>&mdash; Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/2041226868305662178?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

People on the internet lauded the journalist for finally asking what many people had been pointing out. They said that Trump's response cements the belief about his mental health instead of rejecting it. "His answer doesn’t help disprove the point that he’s completely gaga," a user wrote. Another person commented, "Thank you Mr. Reporter!!!! A man with a spine, who knew?"&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-ceasefire-bahrain-faces-aerial-attacks-despite-ceasefire-1775630691059/embed<h2>Trump's changing narrative on Iran war</h2>The question stems from Trump's constantly changing narrative on the Iran war. The president has said on several occasions that the war is over, only to later warn Iran of more attacks. On the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said that the US can open it alone, and later said "The countries of the world that do receive oil through the Hormuz Strait must take care of that passage." His words like "Open the F--kin’ Strait, you crazy bastards" and "a whole civilization will die tonight" have further led to American lawmakers being called on to invoke the 25th Amendment.

Donald Trump mental health: A journalist asked the American president about the critics who say that his mental health should be examined. Trump responded without losing his cool, saying that he had not heard about it, and said they need more people like him. 

At a press conference, a reporter asked Donald Trump about his mental state, leading him to spiral and say things that further raised questions about his capability to lead the United States. The 79-year-old has been raining constant threats on Iran, which have been flagged as unsuitable for a President. Earlier this week, he told Iran, "Open the F--kin’ Strait, you crazy bastards" in a rant on Truth Social. Using expletives to handle a delicate situation, a war that the US and Israel started, led to concerns about Trump and his ability to do the job. A journalist questioned Trump about it outright. "Yesterday on your Truth Social, you called the Iranians ‘crazy bastards.’” Trump replied, "True." The reporter goes on to ask, “What is your response to critics who say that,” and was cut off by Trump, who said, “I don’t care about critics.” The reporter continued, irrespective of what Trump said, and asked, “What is your response to critics who say that it is your mental health that should perhaps be examined as this war continues?” To this, Trump openly answered, "Well, I haven’t heard that. But if that’s the case, you’re gonna have to have more people like me, because our country was being ripped off, on trade, on mil … on everything, for many years until I came along. So if that’s the case, you’re gonna have to have more people." Also Read: Stephen King says, 'I predicted someone like Trump' in a 1979 book: ‘He is deeply unwell’ Also Read: 'You shouldn't talk every day': Macron takes a jibe at Trump's wildly inconsistent messaging on Iran war

Donald Trump mental health: A journalist asked the American president about the critics who say that his mental health should be examined. Trump responded without losing his cool, saying that he had not heard about it, and said they need more people like him.&nbsp;

Reporter asks Trump about his mental health. Here is what the president said

A proposed two-week ceasefire in the United States–Iran conflict is subject to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, according to Donald Trump. Washington said the temporary truce would take effect once safe maritime passage through the vital global oil route is ensured. The development comes as both sides explore negotiations toward a broader agreement, with the Hormuz shipping corridor remaining central to regional security and global energy markets.


US-Iran Ceasefire: US President Says Truce Subject to Opening of Strait of Hormuz

US President Donald Trump has said the United States will help with traffic buildup in the Strait of Hormuz, as efforts continue to restore maritime movement following a temporary US-Iran ceasefire. The key shipping corridor through which a major share of the world’s oil flows—has seen disruption during the conflict.


US-Iran War | Trump: US Will be Helping with Traffic Building in Hormuz

Stephen King, the acclaimed author of several horror thriller novels, said on Tuesday that one of his books talked about a figure exactly like Donald Trump. The Dead Zone is a 1979 thriller about a man who wakes up from a coma with the power to see the future. This character then sees a future with a US president who threatens the world with nuclear war. Referring to the book, King wrote on BlueSky, "I predicted someone like Trump many years ago, in THE DEAD ZONE." He called for urgent action to avoid a major disaster. "So now I'm saying this--in the next 12-16 months, we're going to find out if the two machines for the removal of a man unable to fulfil his duties actually work. They are the impeachment and the 25th Amendment. He is deeply unwell," King wrote. Trump hasn't threatened the use of nuclear weapons in the Iran War, but his threats are getting cruder each day.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-i-hear-yes-trump-s-big-hint-about-china-s-role-in-pressuring-iran-for-ceasefire-with-us-1775618069783">'I hear yes': Trump's BIG hint about China's role in pressuring Iran for ceasefire with US</a>&nbsp;On Tuesday, he wrote, "A whole civilization will die tonight", sending shockwaves throughout the world. American lawmakers called him out for saying such things as the president of the United States. Notably, in King's book "The Dead Zone," the man doesn't become the president, but is a successful businessman who runs for Congress and launches a campaign. He uses wrongful means to attack his opponents. The psychic protagonist sees all this before it happens and tries to assassinate him. He fails, but his action changes the future and saves the world from Armageddon. King compared Trump to this congressman in his book, but does not suggest anything more.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-ve-had-enough-trump-says-iran-can-start-reconstruction-hints-us-troops-will-be-hangin-around-in-region-1775621728484">‘They’ve had enough’: Trump says Iran can ‘start reconstruction’, hints US troops will be ‘hangin’ around’ in region</a>&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260408/image-1775628104974.png"></figure><h2>Latest on Iran War ceasefire</h2> A two-week ceasefire has been announced between the United States and Iran right before the 8 pm deadline set by Trump for Iran to enter a deal. It provides a window for formal negotiations. The deal involves a halt to US and Israeli strikes on Iranian infrastructure in exchange for the safe reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran released several statements on the ceasefire. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X, "If attacks against Iran are halted, our Powerful Armed Forces will cease their defensive operations." He added that Iran was considering the 15-point proposal of the United States, and that Washington had accepted the framework of Iran’s 10-point proposal and based negotiations on it.

Donald Trump's threatening words and actions have led Stephen King to say that he is similar to a character he wrote about in his 1979 book The Dead Zone, who set the stage for nuclear war.  

Stephen King, the acclaimed author of several horror thriller novels, said on Tuesday that one of his books talked about a figure exactly like Donald Trump. The Dead Zone is a 1979 thriller about a man who wakes up from a coma with the power to see the future. This character then sees a future with a US president who threatens the world with nuclear war. Referring to the book, King wrote on BlueSky, "I predicted someone like Trump many years ago, in THE DEAD ZONE." He called for urgent action to avoid a major disaster. "So now I'm saying this--in the next 12-16 months, we're going to find out if the two machines for the removal of a man unable to fulfil his duties actually work. They are the impeachment and the 25th Amendment. He is deeply unwell," King wrote. Trump hasn't threatened the use of nuclear weapons in the Iran War, but his threats are getting cruder each day. Also Read: 'I hear yes': Trump's BIG hint about China's role in pressuring Iran for ceasefire with US On Tuesday, he wrote, "A whole civilization will die tonight", sending shockwaves throughout the world. American lawmakers called him out for saying such things as the president of the United States. Notably, in King's book "The Dead Zone," the man doesn't become the president, but is a successful businessman who runs for Congress and launches a campaign. He uses wrongful means to attack his opponents. The psychic protagonist sees all this before it happens and tries to assassinate him. He fails, but his action changes the future and saves the world from Armageddon. King compared Trump to this congressman in his book, but does not suggest anything more. Also Read: ‘They’ve had enough’: Trump says Iran can ‘start reconstruction’, hints US troops will be ‘hangin’ around’ in region Latest on Iran War ceasefire A two-week ceasefire has been announced between the United States and Iran right before the 8 pm deadline set by Trump for Iran to enter a deal. It provides a window for formal negotiations. The deal involves a halt to US and Israeli strikes on Iranian infrastructure in exchange for the safe reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran released several statements on the ceasefire. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X, "If attacks against Iran are halted, our Powerful Armed Forces will cease their defensive operations." He added that Iran was considering the 15-point proposal of the United States, and that Washington had accepted the framework of Iran’s 10-point proposal and based negotiations on it.

Donald Trump's threatening words and actions have led Stephen King to say that he is similar to a character he wrote about in his 1979 book The Dead Zone, who set the stage for nuclear war. &nbsp;

Stephen King says, 'I predicted someone like Trump' in a 1979 book: 'He is deeply unwell'

U.S. President Trump’s ceasefire announcement has significantly impacted the energy and market prices.


Global Stocks Soar on Temporary Truce

Americans are shocked to see their president issue a threat of wiping out an entire civilisation. Lawmakers have not only called for his removal, but have made statements calling the whole thing “insane" and that the president has lost it. 

'His mental faculties are collapsing', 'deeply flawed man' and more: American lawmakers shocked at Trump's extreme remarks

The United States and Iran have agreed to a two-week ceasefire in the ongoing US-Iran war, with Israel also joining the temporary pause in military operations as diplomatic efforts intensify. The truce is linked to steps including reopening the Strait of Hormuz and advancing negotiations toward a broader agreement.


US-Iran War: US & Iran Agree Two-Week Ceasefire, Israel Also On Board

US President Donald Trump has paused planned strikes on Iran just ahead of his “obliteration deadline”, signaling a temporary shift toward diplomacy amid escalating tensions in the US-Iran war. The pause comes as negotiations continue over reopening the Strait of Hormuz and a possible ceasefire framework.


US-Iran War: Trump Pauses Iran Strikes Before ‘Obliteration Deadline' 

A new phrase is beginning to circulate in geopolitical and financial circles, the ‘TACO method’. It describes a pattern that appears increasingly visible in US President Donald Trump’s handling of the Iran crisis: Threat, Anxiety, Chaos… and then an off-ramp. The latest episode unfolded just hours before what was expected to be a major escalation. Trump had warned that if Iran failed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by 8 pm Eastern Time, the United States would launch devastating attacks, rhetoric that included threats of wiping out ‘an entire civilization’.&nbsp;&nbsp;Markets reacted immediately. Oil prices surged, equities wobbled, and global uncertainty spiked. And then, just as the world braced for impact, Trump stepped back. Instead of military action, he announced a two-week suspension of bombing, effectively pausing the crisis and reopening the door for negotiations.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/north-korea-fires-second-projectile-in-two-days-south-korea-on-alert-what-s-happening-1775614768970">North Korea fires second projectile in two days, South Korea on alert. What's happening?</a><h2>A cycle of threats that moves markets</h2>What makes this moment significant is not just the escalation, but the pattern. Each cycle appears to begin with a dramatic threat. Trump’s language, often maximalist and urgent, injects immediate uncertainty into global systems. In the Iran case, the stakes are especially high due to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery through which nearly 20% of the world’s oil supply flows.The reaction is almost instant and predictable:<ul><li>Oil prices spike on fears of supply disruption</li><li>Stock markets fall amid rising geopolitical risk</li><li>Investors shift toward safe-haven assets like gold</li><li>Governments and allies push for restraint</li></ul>This phase creates a wave of pressure, economic, political, and diplomatic. As tensions escalate, the cost of following through on threats rises, not just for adversaries, but for the global economy and domestic stability as well.<h2>The sudden pivot: From chaos to calm</h2>Then comes the reversal. At the peak of uncertainty, the strategy appears to pivot toward de-escalation, a ceasefire, a delay, or a conditional negotiation. In this case, the condition was clear: Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for a halt in US military action.The shift is immediate:<ul><li>Oil prices cool as supply fears ease</li><li>Stock markets rebound, often sharply</li><li>Risk sentiment returns across global markets</li><li>Diplomatic channels take center stage</li></ul>This pattern, threat followed by retreat, is what analysts are increasingly labeling as the “TACO method.” Supporters argue it is a form of calculated brinkmanship: apply maximum pressure to force concessions, then offer an off-ramp to avoid full-scale conflict. Critics, however, warn that such cycles create unnecessary volatility and carry serious risks of miscalculation. Because in geopolitics, timing is everything. If a threat is taken too seriously or a retreat comes too late, the consequences may no longer be reversible.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-two-week-period-to-be-used-to-negotiate-larger-agreement-1775618956501/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-two-week-period-to-be-used-to-negotiate-larger-agreement-1775618956501/embed</a>&nbsp;Trump’s handling of the Iran crisis is beginning to look less like unpredictability and more like a structured cycle of pressure and release. Threaten hard. Let the world react. Then step back. For now, markets seem to be learning the rhythm, falling on escalation, rising on relief. But the real danger lies in assuming the cycle will always reset. Because one day, it might not.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Trump’s ‘TACO strategy’ in Iran war: Threat, Panic, Ceasefire, Repeat

A new phrase is beginning to circulate in geopolitical and financial circles, the ‘TACO method’. It describes a pattern that appears increasingly visible in US President Donald Trump’s handling of the Iran crisis: Threat, Anxiety, Chaos… and then an off-ramp. The latest episode unfolded just hours before what was expected to be a major escalation. Trump had warned that if Iran failed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by 8 pm Eastern Time, the United States would launch devastating attacks, rhetoric that included threats of wiping out ‘an entire civilization’. Markets reacted immediately. Oil prices surged, equities wobbled, and global uncertainty spiked. And then, just as the world braced for impact, Trump stepped back. Instead of military action, he announced a two-week suspension of bombing, effectively pausing the crisis and reopening the door for negotiations. Also Read: North Korea fires second projectile in two days, South Korea on alert. What's happening? A cycle of threats that moves markets What makes this moment significant is not just the escalation, but the pattern. Each cycle appears to begin with a dramatic threat. Trump’s language, often maximalist and urgent, injects immediate uncertainty into global systems. In the Iran case, the stakes are especially high due to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery through which nearly 20% of the world’s oil supply flows. The reaction is almost instant and predictable: Oil prices spike on fears of supply disruption Stock markets fall amid rising geopolitical risk Investors shift toward safe-haven assets like gold Governments and allies push for restraint This phase creates a wave of pressure, economic, political, and diplomatic. As tensions escalate, the cost of following through on threats rises, not just for adversaries, but for the global economy and domestic stability as well. The sudden pivot: From chaos to calm Then comes the reversal. At the peak of uncertainty, the strategy appears to pivot toward de-escalation, a ceasefire, a delay, or a conditional negotiation. In this case, the condition was clear: Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for a halt in US military action. The shift is immediate: Oil prices cool as supply fears ease Stock markets rebound, often sharply Risk sentiment returns across global markets Diplomatic channels take center stage This pattern, threat followed by retreat, is what analysts are increasingly labeling as the “TACO method.” Supporters argue it is a form of calculated brinkmanship: apply maximum pressure to force concessions, then offer an off-ramp to avoid full-scale conflict. Critics, however, warn that such cycles create unnecessary volatility and carry serious risks of miscalculation. Because in geopolitics, timing is everything. If a threat is taken too seriously or a retreat comes too late, the consequences may no longer be reversible. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-two-week-period-to-be-used-to-negotiate-larger-agreement-1775618956501/embed Trump’s handling of the Iran crisis is beginning to look less like unpredictability and more like a structured cycle of pressure and release. Threaten hard. Let the world react. Then step back. For now, markets seem to be learning the rhythm, falling on escalation, rising on relief. But the real danger lies in assuming the cycle will always reset. Because one day, it might not. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

The Iran war narrative is following a cycle: threats, panic, ceasefire. Analysts are calling it Donald Trump’s ‘TACO method.’ Let's find out what it is

The two-week truce in the US-Iran war is expected to be used as a critical window for negotiations toward a larger and longer-term agreement between Washington and Tehran. US President Donald Trump said the pause in hostilities could help finalize key terms already discussed under a proposed framework, including maritime access through the Strait of Hormuz and broader regional security arrangements.


US-Iran War: Two-Week Period to be Used to Negotiate Larger Agreement 

US-Iran War: Trump Pauses Iran Strikes Before 'Obliteration Deadline'

Amid the ongoing US-Iran war, Iran has ordered all military units to halt firing following US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a two-week truce aimed at creating space for negotiations. The temporary ceasefire comes as diplomatic efforts intensify, with talks expected to continue in the coming days.


US-Iran War: Iran Orders All Units to Halt Fire After Trump’s Two-Week Truce

US President Donald Trump has said that Iran has submitted a “workable” 10-point proposal that could form the basis for negotiations to end the ongoing US-Iran war. The proposal is being discussed as part of efforts to secure a temporary ceasefire and move toward a broader agreement, with talks expected to continue through diplomatic channels.


US-Iran War | Trump: Iran Has Sent 'Workable' 10-Point Proposal 

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

US-Iran War: Iran Says Ships Must Coordinate Before Passing Through Hormuz

FACT CHECK: Melania Trump denies Epstein, Maxwell ties, but THESE emails show...

'They better not...': Trump warns Iran over alleged tanker fees in Hormuz

'Low IQ, stupid and losers': Trump lashes out on Carlson, Kelly, Owens & Jones

US-Iran Ceasefire: Iran Demands Right to Enrichment, US Says it Remains a Red Line

'Church had better take its side': Did Trump officials threaten Vatican?

Donald Trump Blasts NATO: Rutte Says Trump's 'Clearly Disappointed With Many NATO Allies'

Trump's warning to Iran after ceasefire, wants 'REAL AGREEMENT' to be followed

US-Iran War: Trump's Threat To End Iran Civilisation Triggers Political Slugfest

Trump blasts NATO after closed-door meeting with Rutte, revives Greenland threat

IN PIC | All the times Trump vowed to resolve global crisis in 'two-three weeks'