Roman Sharf, a Russian CEO, has won an autographed pair of Donald Trump's new golden sneakers, dubbed the "Never Surrender high-tops." He paid a winning bid of $9,000 for the shoes at Philadelphia's Sneaker Con.

<h2>Surprise launch&nbsp;</h2>

The sneakers were announced by Trump, who made a surprise appearance at the event on Saturday (Jan 17). The launch of these sneakers was part of his new shoe line, reports the New York Times Post.

Limited to just 1000 pairs, the golden sneakers, which feature an American flag detail on the back, reportedly sold out in less than two hours after the launch, with each pair costing $399.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-launches-sneaker-line-a-day-after-he-was-fined-in-new-york-civil-fraud-case-691338">Trump launches sneaker line a day after he was fined in New York civil fraud case</a>

Sharf expressed his excitement about winning the bid, stating, "We are going to have a winning celebration come this November, and I'll be wearing these one-of-one Donald Trump-signed sneakers—the only president I recognised the last four years."&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Passing these down to my kids, but for now will display in the office 😎
— Roman Sharf | CEO of Luxury Bazaar (@romansharf) <a href="https://twitter.com/romansharf/status/1758985867706663020?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 17, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Replying to a post on X, he also mentioned his intention to eventually pass the shoes down to his children, "But for now will display in the office," he said.

<h2>Who is Roman Sharf?</h2>

Born in the Soviet Union and residing in Philadelphia, Sharf is the founder and CEO of a luxury watch dealer 'Luxury Bazaar'. The Russian CEO describes himself as "one of the world's biggest grey market watch dealers," trading luxury watches without authorisation from the brands.&nbsp;

Watch |&nbsp;Trump unveils sneaker line a day after $350m court ruling

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-unveils-sneaker-line-a-day-after-350m-court-ruling-691386/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

His business, which employs 30 staff, as per WatchPro, generates about $130 million in sales annually. It has made him a prominent figure in the luxury watch industry.

<h2>Trump's shoe line</h2>

The ex-US president was met with both boos and cheers from the crowd as he introduced the shoe line which also includes a low-top style in either "T-Red" or "POTUS" white, both featuring a golden "45" on the side, priced at $305 (US$199).&nbsp;

<img alt="Trump sneakers" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="196c6c92-b2cc-46ca-8282-eb95c41c2b55" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/New%20wion%20-%202024-02-19T191330.642.jpg" />

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-declares-brazilian-president-lula-persona-non-grata-over-antisemitic-comments-691703">Israel declares Brazilian President Lula 'persona non grata' over 'antisemitic' comments</a>

Additionally, the website offers "Victory 47" perfume for $151 (US$99).

The announcement of Trump's shoe line came shortly after a New York judge ordered him to pay $544.5 million (US$355 million) for allegedly inflating his net worth to deceive banks and insurers.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Roman Sharf, a Russian CEO, has won an autographed pair of Donald Trump's new golden sneakers, dubbed the "Never Surrender high-tops." He paid a winning bid of $9,000 for the shoes at Philadelphia's Sneaker Con.

Roman Sharf, a Russian CEO, has won an autographed pair of Donald Trump's new golden sneakers, dubbed the "Never Surrender high-tops." He paid a winning bid of $9,000 for the shoes at Philadelphia's Sneaker Con. Surprise launch The sneakers were announced by Trump, who made a surprise appearance at the event on Saturday (Jan 17). The launch of these sneakers was part of his new shoe line, reports the New York Times Post. Limited to just 1000 pairs, the golden sneakers, which feature an American flag detail on the back, reportedly sold out in less than two hours after the launch, with each pair costing $399. Also read | Trump launches sneaker line a day after he was fined in New York civil fraud case Sharf expressed his excitement about winning the bid, stating, "We are going to have a winning celebration come this November, and I'll be wearing these one-of-one Donald Trump-signed sneakers—the only president I recognised the last four years." Passing these down to my kids, but for now will display in the office 😎 — Roman Sharf | CEO of Luxury Bazaar (@romansharf) February 17, 2024 × Replying to a post on X, he also mentioned his intention to eventually pass the shoes down to his children, "But for now will display in the office," he said. Who is Roman Sharf? Born in the Soviet Union and residing in Philadelphia, Sharf is the founder and CEO of a luxury watch dealer 'Luxury Bazaar'. The Russian CEO describes himself as "one of the world's biggest grey market watch dealers," trading luxury watches without authorisation from the brands. Watch | Trump unveils sneaker line a day after $350m court ruling × His business, which employs 30 staff, as per WatchPro, generates about $130 million in sales annually. It has made him a prominent figure in the luxury watch industry. Trump's shoe line The ex-US president was met with both boos and cheers from the crowd as he introduced the shoe line which also includes a low-top style in either "T-Red" or "POTUS" white, both featuring a golden "45" on the side, priced at $305 (US$199). Also read | Israel declares Brazilian President Lula 'persona non grata' over 'antisemitic' comments Additionally, the website offers "Victory 47" perfume for $151 (US$99). The announcement of Trump's shoe line came shortly after a New York judge ordered him to pay $544.5 million (US$355 million) for allegedly inflating his net worth to deceive banks and insurers. (With inputs from agencies)

Luxury Bazaar CEO Roman Sharf bags Trump-autographed ‘Never Surrender’ sneakers for $9,000

Former US President Donald Trump commented on the current Supreme Court hearing that could determine his eligibility to run in the Colorado Republican primary. At a news conference on Thursday (February 8), Trump expressed confidence in the arguments presented by his legal team, emphasizing his leading position in polls across various states and the nation and questioning the fairness of potentially disqualifying the most popular candidate from the race.

Mega battle for South Carolina: Haley's last stand in home state | Race To Power

When ex-US President Donald Trump woke up on Saturday (Feb 17), his total legal debt obligations had soared to over half a billion dollars. A day before, a New York Judge ruled that he must cough up more than $350 million plus pre-judgment interest for intentional financial fraud stretching more than a decade.

According to New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the case against Trump, the GOP leader may be forced to pay $463.9 million in total. “That represents $363.9 million in disgorgement, plus $100 million in interest, which will continue to increase every single day until it is paid,” she said in a press conference Friday night.

This penalty came weeks after he was ordered to pay $83.3 million to writer E. Jean Carroll for damaging her reputation after she accused him of sexual assault. A separate jury had awarded Carroll $5 million from Trump for sexual abuse and defamation last year.

Trump maintains he is innocent and has denied any wrongdoing. So, what comes next, and will he have to pay up the full amount?

<h2>How much money does Trump owe?</h2>

In the above two cases, Trump owes above $540 million in total, including interest. But that’s not all. He owes another $110,000 for refusing to comply with a subpoena in the civil fraud case and $15,000 for repeatedly attacking the judge's law clerk in violation of a gag order.

Additionally, he also owes $400,000 in legal fees to the New York Times after an unsuccessful suing attempt.

<h2>Can Trump seek relief in higher courts?</h2>

Yes, certainly! It’s common in the US to get such high-amount judgments reduced on appeals.

He is expected to appeal the $350 million civil fraud case with an intermediate-level court first. If Trump remains unsatisfied, he could try to get the case taken up by New York's top appellate court, though legal experts say that is unlikely.

<h2>Trump’s net worth and his ability to pay</h2>

Trump claims he is worth $10 billion. Although, according to independent estimates, including one by the New York attorney general, the figure is close to $2 billion.

However, it is not clear whether Trump has enough cash in hand to pay off the legal obligations. A 2021 financial statement revealed the GOP leader had just under $300 million in "cash and cash equivalents."

Since then, he has sold a number of assets including his New York golf course and his Washington DC hotel.

<h2>Will Trump declare bankruptcy?</h2>

As per Friday’s ruling, Trump would have to pay the amount even if the Trump Organization declares bankruptcy. But the equation changes if Trump himself does so.

In that scenario, which experts and observers deem drastic and extremely unlikely, the enforcement of the judgments against him will stop.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-jsarwt="1" data-usg="AOvVaw2p4BTzhgWhOAuBUpVTw9Je" data-ved="2ahUKEwiKm7_borWEAxUWxzgGHY6bDpMQxfQBKAB6BAgREAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-should-be-disqualified-from-2024-presidential-race-for-insurrection-on-jan-6-say-lawyers-653257" jsname="YKoRaf">Trump should be disqualified from 2024 presidential race for ‘insurrection’ on Jan 6, say lawyers</a>

Trump in the past has bragged about the fact that he has never declared bankruptcy.

<h2>Can Trump use money from Republican fund?</h2>

Some are raising doubts whether Trump will use the campaign funds to pay his legal debt. Under federal election laws, that is illegal. However, he might still be able to use political action committees or PAC’s money for his expenses.

Watch:&nbsp;US: Trump's legal advisor Michael Cohen accidentally cited fake court cases generated by AI

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-trumps-legal-advisor-michael-cohen-accidentally-cited-fake-court-cases-generated-by-ai-675433/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

In the last two years, Trump’s fundraising organisation has spent nearly $80 million on his legal fees. "The likelihood of the Federal Election Commission in its current configuration pursuing these violations is not terribly great," said Daniel Weiner, the director of the Brennan Center's Elections and Government Program.

Trump has already attracted criticism for eying to siphon campaign cash from the Republican National Committee (RNC).

Nikki Haley, Trump’s sole remaining rival for the Republican presidential nomination, said she won’t allow the RNC to be his personal piggy bank.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-jsarwt="1" data-usg="AOvVaw0_FhtN266qN9Sj_dHoBZE7" data-ved="2ahUKEwiKm7_borWEAxUWxzgGHY6bDpMQxfQBKAB6BAgSEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/trumps-tricky-dual-purpose-campaign-win-elections-and-stay-out-of-prison-627405" jsname="YKoRaf">Trump’s tricky dual-purpose campaign – win elections and stay out of prison</a>

“I don’t want the RNC to become his piggy bank for his personal court cases,” she told CNN’s The Source.

“We’ve already seen him spend $50 million worth of campaign contributions … Now we see him trying to get control of the RNC so that he can continue not to have to pay his own legal fees,” she added.

Meanwhile, Trump has installed his loyalists, including his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, in leadership roles at the RNC.

<h2>What if Trump fails to repay?</h2>

Trump risks getting his assets seized and wages garnished if he fails to pay the legal judgments.

According to Weiner, "the president is not a king and the president's assets are not sacrosanct just because he happened to be the president."

According to University of Michigan law professor Will Thomas, the courts enjoy great powers, especially when someone like Trump is involved.

"The court might say we're going to freeze your bank account. Or even worse, they could say, 'We're seizing Trump Tower and we're putting it up for sale,'" he said.

(With inputs from agencies)

When ex-US President Donald Trump woke up on Saturday (Feb 17), his total legal debt obligations had soared to over half a billion dollars. A day before, a New York Judge ruled that he must cough up more than $350 million plus pre-judgment interest for intentional financial fraud stretching more than a decade.

When ex-US President Donald Trump woke up on Saturday (Feb 17), his total legal debt obligations had soared to over half a billion dollars. A day before, a New York Judge ruled that he must cough up more than $350 million plus pre-judgment interest for intentional financial fraud stretching more than a decade. According to New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the case against Trump, the GOP leader may be forced to pay $463.9 million in total. “That represents $363.9 million in disgorgement, plus $100 million in interest, which will continue to increase every single day until it is paid,” she said in a press conference Friday night. This penalty came weeks after he was ordered to pay $83.3 million to writer E. Jean Carroll for damaging her reputation after she accused him of sexual assault. A separate jury had awarded Carroll $5 million from Trump for sexual abuse and defamation last year. Trump maintains he is innocent and has denied any wrongdoing. So, what comes next, and will he have to pay up the full amount? How much money does Trump owe? In the above two cases, Trump owes above $540 million in total, including interest. But that’s not all. He owes another $110,000 for refusing to comply with a subpoena in the civil fraud case and $15,000 for repeatedly attacking the judge's law clerk in violation of a gag order. Additionally, he also owes $400,000 in legal fees to the New York Times after an unsuccessful suing attempt. Can Trump seek relief in higher courts? Yes, certainly! It’s common in the US to get such high-amount judgments reduced on appeals. He is expected to appeal the $350 million civil fraud case with an intermediate-level court first. If Trump remains unsatisfied, he could try to get the case taken up by New York's top appellate court, though legal experts say that is unlikely. Trump’s net worth and his ability to pay Trump claims he is worth $10 billion. Although, according to independent estimates, including one by the New York attorney general, the figure is close to $2 billion. However, it is not clear whether Trump has enough cash in hand to pay off the legal obligations. A 2021 financial statement revealed the GOP leader had just under $300 million in "cash and cash equivalents." Since then, he has sold a number of assets including his New York golf course and his Washington DC hotel. Will Trump declare bankruptcy? As per Friday’s ruling, Trump would have to pay the amount even if the Trump Organization declares bankruptcy. But the equation changes if Trump himself does so. In that scenario, which experts and observers deem drastic and extremely unlikely, the enforcement of the judgments against him will stop. Also read: Trump should be disqualified from 2024 presidential race for ‘insurrection’ on Jan 6, say lawyers Trump in the past has bragged about the fact that he has never declared bankruptcy. Can Trump use money from Republican fund? Some are raising doubts whether Trump will use the campaign funds to pay his legal debt. Under federal election laws, that is illegal. However, he might still be able to use political action committees or PAC’s money for his expenses. Watch: US: Trump's legal advisor Michael Cohen accidentally cited fake court cases generated by AI × In the last two years, Trump’s fundraising organisation has spent nearly $80 million on his legal fees. "The likelihood of the Federal Election Commission in its current configuration pursuing these violations is not terribly great," said Daniel Weiner, the director of the Brennan Center's Elections and Government Program. Trump has already attracted criticism for eying to siphon campaign cash from the Republican National Committee (RNC). Nikki Haley, Trump’s sole remaining rival for the Republican presidential nomination, said she won’t allow the RNC to be his personal piggy bank. Also read: Trump’s tricky dual-purpose campaign – win elections and stay out of prison “I don’t want the RNC to become his piggy bank for his personal court cases,” she told CNN’s The Source. “We’ve already seen him spend $50 million worth of campaign contributions … Now we see him trying to get control of the RNC so that he can continue not to have to pay his own legal fees,” she added. Meanwhile, Trump has installed his loyalists, including his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, in leadership roles at the RNC. What if Trump fails to repay? Trump risks getting his assets seized and wages garnished if he fails to pay the legal judgments. According to Weiner, "the president is not a king and the president's assets are not sacrosanct just because he happened to be the president." According to University of Michigan law professor Will Thomas, the courts enjoy great powers, especially when someone like Trump is involved. "The court might say we're going to freeze your bank account. Or even worse, they could say, 'We're seizing Trump Tower and we're putting it up for sale,'" he said. (With inputs from agencies)

Explained: Will Trump declare bankruptcy as his legal debt soars over $500 million?

Former United States president and current presidential hopeful Donald Trump has been ordered to pay $354.9 million to the state of New York in penalties for fraudulently overstating his net worth to dupe lenders, a judge ruled on Friday (Feb 16).

Former United States president and current presidential hopeful Donald Trump has been ordered to pay $354.9 million to the state of New York in penalties for fraudulently overstating his net worth to dupe lenders, a judge ruled on Friday (Feb 16). According to a report by the news agency Reuters, Justice Arthur Engoron also banned Trump from serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation for three years. Justice Engoron cancelled his prior ruling in Sept last year that ordered the "dissolution" of companies that control pillars of Trump's real estate empire. He said on Friday that this was no longer necessary because he is appointing an independent monitor and compliance director to oversee the 77-year-old Republican's business. In his ruling, Engoron said that Trump and the other defendants in the civil fraud case were incapable of admitting the error of their ways. "Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological. Instead, they adopt a 'See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' posture that the evidence belies," he said. The case The civil fraud case came into light after a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James accused Trump and his family businesses of overstating his net worth by as much as $3.6 billion a year over a decade to fool bankers into giving him better loan terms. Trump's two sons- Eric and Donald Trump Jr were also found liable in the case and ordered to pay more than $4 million each. Also read | Stormy Daniels hush money case: New York judge sets March 25 date for historic criminal trial of Trump The former president faces no threat of imprisonment as the case is civil and not criminal. Friday's ruling is a major blow to his business empire and financial standing. Justice Engoron said on Friday that Trump and his companies' past run-ins with the law were part of the reason for the stiff penalties. The Trump Organization was found guilty of criminal tax fraud in 2022, and two other entities Trump ran previously settled allegations of wrongdoing brought by the state of New York, Reuters reported. During a trial testimony in November last year, Trump conceded that the value of some of his properties were inaccurate but insisted banks were obligated to do their own due diligence. 'Crooked Biden" Trump has accused President Joe Biden of driving the civil fraud case calling it "weaponisation against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls", and vowed to appeal. "A New York State judge just ruled, and he's crooked as you could get and a lot of people expected something like this, but not for the amount. But this is a very dishonest man. This is a man that's been overturned already on this case four times," Trump said on Friday. "This judge thought Mar-a-Lago is worth 18 million dollars and it's worth anywhere from 50 to 100 times that amount. So, we realized that. He ruled against me before he even got the case. He ruled against me, said I was guilty. He didn't know what I was guilty of before he even got the case. And Letitia James, that's another case altogether. She's a horribly corrupt attorney general, and it's all having to do with election interference,” he added. Also watch | US: Fani Willis blames Trump co-defendants of 'lying' in court about misconduct × His lawyer Alina Habba, meanwhile, said in a statement that the ruling was a "manifest injustice" and the "culmination of a multi-year, politically fueled witch hunt" against Trump. "This is not just about Donald Trump - if this decision stands, it will serve as a signal to every single American that New York is no longer open for business," Habba added. (With inputs from agencies)

New York fraud case: Trump ordered to pay nearly $355 mn, barred from doing business in state for 3 yrs

The civil fraud case came into light after a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James accused Trump and his family businesses of overstating his net worth by as much as $3.6 billion a year over a decade to fool bankers into giving him better loan terms.

New York fraud case: Trump ordered to pay $355 mn, barred from doing business in state for 3 yrs

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis took the witness stand Thursday and forcefully pushed back against what she described as “lies” about her romantic relationship with a special prosecutor during an extraordinary hearing over misconduct allegations that threaten to upend one of four criminal cases against Donald Trump.

US: Fani Willis kicks off her testimony by accusing attorney of lying

In a contentious hearing, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Deputy Prosecutor Nathan Wade faced allegations regarding their past relationship and its impact on the criminal case against Donald Trump and his associates. Defendant Mike Roman urged disqualification of Willis and Wade, citing conflict of interest, potentially jeopardising the entire district attorney’s office.

<h2>Here are some explosive moments from the testimony</h2>

Witness dilemma

&nbsp;

Terrence Bradley, a former colleague of Nathan Wade, was anticipated to provide crucial testimony suggesting that the district attorney's relationship commenced earlier than Wade had claimed in an affidavit. Judge Scott McAfee hinted that the fate of subpoenas for Wade, Willis, and others rested partly on the strength of Bradley's testimony, which would determine whether the legal proceedings were legitimate or mere distractions. However, citing attorney-client privilege, Bradley, who had previously served as Wade's divorce attorney, declined to disclose details regarding his knowledge of the relationship between Wade and Willis. This momentary standoff suggested a potentially premature conclusion to the hearing.

Damning testimony

Robin Bryant-Yeartie, a former associate of Willis, testified that she knew of Willis's romantic involvement with Wade, stating that they began dating in 2019, prior to Willis's election as district attorney and before the controversial phone call from Donald Trump to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensberger, which triggered the investigation.

Bryant-Yeartie's testimony directly contradicted Wade's sworn affidavit in his divorce case, wherein he claimed not to have been in a relationship while still married. Despite prosecutors highlighting Bryant-Yeartie's strained relationship with Willis and her departure from the district attorney's office amid conflict, her testimony prompted Wade, and later Willis, to testify.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-house-passes-quad-bill-what-does-it-mean-for-india-690743">Also read |&nbsp;US House passes Quad bill: What does it mean for India?</a>

Wade's testimony

Wade's testimony was characterised by unexpected developments, disclosing additional details about the timeline, including his battle with cancer in 2020, which constrained his ability to engage in external relationships during the pandemic. He also stressed the manner in which he and Willis claimed to manage expenses, with him using a credit card for payment and her reimbursing him with cash.

Fani Willis's vigorous defence

&nbsp;

Initially hesitant to testify, Willis ultimately disregarded her legal counsel's objections and took the stand on Thursday afternoon, asserting, "I'm prepared to proceed." Under the scrutiny of the courtroom, Willis endeavoured to address and dismiss every accusation while redirecting the narrative. Displaying a mix of humour and defiance, she remarked on her preferences compared to Wade's during a trip to Napa Valley, and at times, she directly challenged the attorneys and sought to convey a broader message to the public about the nature of the trial.

Also watch |&nbsp;US: Fani Willis blames Trump co-defendants of 'lying' in court about misconduct

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-fani-willis-blames-trump-co-defendants-of-lying-in-court-about-misconduct-690762/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

(With inputs from agencies)

In a contentious hearing, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Deputy Prosecutor Nathan Wade faced allegations regarding their past relationship and its impact on the criminal case against Donald Trump and his associates.

In a contentious hearing, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Deputy Prosecutor Nathan Wade faced allegations regarding their past relationship and its impact on the criminal case against Donald Trump and his associates. Defendant Mike Roman urged disqualification of Willis and Wade, citing conflict of interest, potentially jeopardising the entire district attorney’s office. Here are some explosive moments from the testimony Witness dilemma Terrence Bradley, a former colleague of Nathan Wade, was anticipated to provide crucial testimony suggesting that the district attorney's relationship commenced earlier than Wade had claimed in an affidavit. Judge Scott McAfee hinted that the fate of subpoenas for Wade, Willis, and others rested partly on the strength of Bradley's testimony, which would determine whether the legal proceedings were legitimate or mere distractions. However, citing attorney-client privilege, Bradley, who had previously served as Wade's divorce attorney, declined to disclose details regarding his knowledge of the relationship between Wade and Willis. This momentary standoff suggested a potentially premature conclusion to the hearing. Damning testimony Robin Bryant-Yeartie, a former associate of Willis, testified that she knew of Willis's romantic involvement with Wade, stating that they began dating in 2019, prior to Willis's election as district attorney and before the controversial phone call from Donald Trump to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensberger, which triggered the investigation. Bryant-Yeartie's testimony directly contradicted Wade's sworn affidavit in his divorce case, wherein he claimed not to have been in a relationship while still married. Despite prosecutors highlighting Bryant-Yeartie's strained relationship with Willis and her departure from the district attorney's office amid conflict, her testimony prompted Wade, and later Willis, to testify. Also read | US House passes Quad bill: What does it mean for India? Wade's testimony Wade's testimony was characterised by unexpected developments, disclosing additional details about the timeline, including his battle with cancer in 2020, which constrained his ability to engage in external relationships during the pandemic. He also stressed the manner in which he and Willis claimed to manage expenses, with him using a credit card for payment and her reimbursing him with cash. Fani Willis's vigorous defence Initially hesitant to testify, Willis ultimately disregarded her legal counsel's objections and took the stand on Thursday afternoon, asserting, "I'm prepared to proceed." Under the scrutiny of the courtroom, Willis endeavoured to address and dismiss every accusation while redirecting the narrative. Displaying a mix of humour and defiance, she remarked on her preferences compared to Wade's during a trip to Napa Valley, and at times, she directly challenged the attorneys and sought to convey a broader message to the public about the nature of the trial. Also watch | US: Fani Willis blames Trump co-defendants of 'lying' in court about misconduct (With inputs from agencies)

Trump Fulton County case: Explosive moments from Fani Willis' fiery testimony

US: Donald Trump prosecutor Fani Willis accuses defense of 'lies' about misconduct

The US Securities and Exchange commission has approved a merger deal for Donald Trump's media and technology group, valuing the combined entity at $10 billion. This deal involves truth social, Trump's social media platform, merging with a special purpose acquisition company, or S-P-A-C.

Regulator approves Donald Trump media merger

US: Fani Willis blames Trump co-defendants of 'lying' in court about misconduct

Donald Trump said on Wednesday that his recent mixing up of names was intentional. During a speech last month, Trump confused Nikki Haley, his last remaining rival for the Republican presidential nomination, with former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He also suggested former Democratic President Barack Obama was still in office.

"When I purposely interposed names, they said I didn't know Pelosi from Nikki," Trump said at a rally in South Carolina on Wednesday. He said calling Obama the current president was sarcasm, not a gaffe.

"I'm a great speaker," Trump said.

The issue of age and mental competence have been thrust to the forefront of the 2024 election campaign after a report last week suggested US&nbsp;President Joe Biden, 81, was suffering from memory lapses.

Meanwhile, Biden allies have pointed to verbal flubs by former President Trump, including the Haley and Pelosi mix-up and the Obama remark. Trump, the Republican frontrunner for his party's presidential nomination, is eying a general election rematch with Biden in November.

Haley, 52, has called for mental competency tests for presidential candidates over 75 years old, including Biden and Trump, the two oldest men elected to the U.S. presidency.

Some 78% of respondents in a Reuters/Ipsos poll published Tuesday - including 71% of Democrats - think Biden is too old to work in government. Trump suffers less from voter skepticism over his age; 53% of respondents consider him to be too old for government work.

Biden recently mixed up the names of world leaders, including France's former president Francois Mitterrand with its current president, Emmanuel Macron.

Special Counsel Robert Hur, a Republican former US&nbsp;attorney in Maryland during Trump's administration, said in his report on Biden's handling of classified documents last week that Biden was a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory" who was not able to recall to investigators when his son, Beau Biden, died.

Biden responded angrily to the report, saying his memory is "fine".

During Wednesday's rally, Trump also insisted that he "loves" the US&nbsp;military. Haley has attacked him in recent days for past comments Trump has made disparaging veterans, including one last week when he mocked her husband, who is deployed oversees with the Army National Guard.

Trump is close to clinching the Republican nomination after wins in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada.

Haley, who has no clear path to the nomination, is refusing to quit the race, making a potential last stand in her home state of South Carolina in its Feb. 24 primary. She trails badly in opinion polls behind Trump there.

&nbsp;

Donald Trump said on Wednesday that his recent mixing up of names was intentional. During a speech last month, Trump confused Nikki Haley, his last remaining rival for the Republican presidential nomination, with former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Donald Trump said on Wednesday that his recent mixing up of names was intentional. During a speech last month, Trump confused Nikki Haley, his last remaining rival for the Republican presidential nomination, with former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He also suggested former Democratic President Barack Obama was still in office. "When I purposely interposed names, they said I didn't know Pelosi from Nikki," Trump said at a rally in South Carolina on Wednesday. He said calling Obama the current president was sarcasm, not a gaffe. "I'm a great speaker," Trump said. The issue of age and mental competence have been thrust to the forefront of the 2024 election campaign after a report last week suggested US President Joe Biden, 81, was suffering from memory lapses. Meanwhile, Biden allies have pointed to verbal flubs by former President Trump, including the Haley and Pelosi mix-up and the Obama remark. Trump, the Republican frontrunner for his party's presidential nomination, is eying a general election rematch with Biden in November. Haley, 52, has called for mental competency tests for presidential candidates over 75 years old, including Biden and Trump, the two oldest men elected to the U.S. presidency. Some 78% of respondents in a Reuters/Ipsos poll published Tuesday - including 71% of Democrats - think Biden is too old to work in government. Trump suffers less from voter skepticism over his age; 53% of respondents consider him to be too old for government work. Biden recently mixed up the names of world leaders, including France's former president Francois Mitterrand with its current president, Emmanuel Macron. Special Counsel Robert Hur, a Republican former US attorney in Maryland during Trump's administration, said in his report on Biden's handling of classified documents last week that Biden was a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory" who was not able to recall to investigators when his son, Beau Biden, died. Biden responded angrily to the report, saying his memory is "fine". During Wednesday's rally, Trump also insisted that he "loves" the US military. Haley has attacked him in recent days for past comments Trump has made disparaging veterans, including one last week when he mocked her husband, who is deployed oversees with the Army National Guard. Trump is close to clinching the Republican nomination after wins in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. Haley, who has no clear path to the nomination, is refusing to quit the race, making a potential last stand in her home state of South Carolina in its Feb. 24 primary. She trails badly in opinion polls behind Trump there.

Donald Trump says when he mixes up names, it is on purpose

Nearly 20 per cent of Americans believe a conspiracy theory which suggests that Taylor Swift is part of a secret government plot to help US President Joe Biden win a second term, as per a new poll by Monmouth University.

“The supposed Taylor Swift psyop conspiracy has legs among a decent number of Trump supporters,” Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, said in a statement on Tuesday.

“Even many who hadn’t heard about it before we polled them accept the idea as credible. Welcome to the 2024 election," he added.

The poll showed that 46 per cent of the respondents had heard about the conspiracy, whereas 18 per cent said that they believed it.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/biden-calls-for-ban-on-assault-weapons-after-deadly-shooting-at-super-bowl-parade-690387">Kansas shooting: Biden calls for ban on assault weapons after deadly shooting at Super Bowl parade</a>

Among those who believed the conspiracy theory, 71 per cent identified as Republicans whereas 83 per cent as staunch supporters of Trump. Close to&nbsp;73 per cent also believed that the results of the 2020 US Presidential elections were fraudulent.

The conspiracy theory suggests that the United States Defence Department is working alongside Swift to push for pro-Biden propaganda in order to divert the public's attention from Trump.

The theory further posits that the famous pop star may be making use of the NFL to expand her reach to an even broader audience. Swift is dating&nbsp;Travis Kelce of the NFL team Kansas City Chiefs, which won this year's Super Bowl.

Swift endorsed Biden over Trump during the 2020 presidential race. On the other hand, Kelce, a star tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs, endorsed Bud Light beer and vaccinations against coronavirus, which have been the targets of rightwing ire.

Donald Trump has said that Swift would be “disloyal” if she went ahead and endorsed Biden as she widely benefited from the Music Modernization Act, which was related to royalties from streaming services, that was passed during Trump's term.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Nearly 20 per cent of Americans believe a conspiracy theory which suggests that Taylor Swift is part of a secret government plot to help US President Joe Biden win a second term, as per a new poll by Monmouth University.

Nearly 20 per cent of Americans believe a conspiracy theory which suggests that Taylor Swift is part of a secret government plot to help US President Joe Biden win a second term, as per a new poll by Monmouth University. “The supposed Taylor Swift psyop conspiracy has legs among a decent number of Trump supporters,” Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, said in a statement on Tuesday. “Even many who hadn’t heard about it before we polled them accept the idea as credible. Welcome to the 2024 election," he added. The poll showed that 46 per cent of the respondents had heard about the conspiracy, whereas 18 per cent said that they believed it. Also read: Kansas shooting: Biden calls for ban on assault weapons after deadly shooting at Super Bowl parade Among those who believed the conspiracy theory, 71 per cent identified as Republicans whereas 83 per cent as staunch supporters of Trump. Close to 73 per cent also believed that the results of the 2020 US Presidential elections were fraudulent. The conspiracy theory suggests that the United States Defence Department is working alongside Swift to push for pro-Biden propaganda in order to divert the public's attention from Trump. The theory further posits that the famous pop star may be making use of the NFL to expand her reach to an even broader audience. Swift is dating Travis Kelce of the NFL team Kansas City Chiefs, which won this year's Super Bowl. Swift endorsed Biden over Trump during the 2020 presidential race. On the other hand, Kelce, a star tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs, endorsed Bud Light beer and vaccinations against coronavirus, which have been the targets of rightwing ire. Donald Trump has said that Swift would be “disloyal” if she went ahead and endorsed Biden as she widely benefited from the Music Modernization Act, which was related to royalties from streaming services, that was passed during Trump's term. (With inputs from agencies)

Nearly 20 per cent of Americans believe in Taylor Swift-Joe Biden election conspiracy theory, poll finds

A New York judge on Thursday (Feb 15) denied former United States president Donald Trump’s request to dismiss criminal charges related to&nbsp;making hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels in return for her silence on an alleged brief affair with him. The dismissal paves the way for the first-ever criminal trial of a former US president.&nbsp;

<h2>Judge dismisses Trump’s request</h2>

Justice Juan Merchan set a trial date of March 25 for the case, one of four criminal prosecutions that the White House hopeful faces on his list of many legal woes ahead of the upcoming presidential elections.&nbsp;

The 77-year-old asked a judge in Manhattan court to toss the 34-count indictment which includes charges of accounting fraud and falsifying business records to cover up the $130,000 payment to the adult film star ahead of the 2016 presidential election.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trump-launches-immunity-bid-in-us-supreme-court-against-jan-6-trial-689672">Donald Trump launches immunity bid in US Supreme Court against Jan 6 trial</a>

The Republican frontrunner has pleaded not guilty to the charges brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat.&nbsp;

The prosecutors have accused Trump of illegally covering up remittances to his longtime lawyer, Michael Cohen to reimburse him for payments about the Republican frontrunner’s alleged extramarital sexual relations with Daniels and a Playboy model.&nbsp;

On Thursday, Trump’s lawyer Todd Blanche argued that the trial date was “unconstitutional,” since his client has three additional criminal trials to deal with as well as the upcoming elections.&nbsp;

Blanche also went on to call it “election interference.” However, Judge Merchan quickly dismissed his arguments saying “He’s not going to be in more than one criminal trial at the same time.”&nbsp;

<h2>‘Politically motivated’</h2>

Ahead of the hearing in the Manhattan court, Trump reiterated his claims that the case is politically motivated and said “This is not a crime”.&nbsp;

“They wouldn’t have brought this except for the fact - no way - except for the fact that I’m running for president and doing well,” the former president added.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-why-was-trump-indicted-heres-what-happens-next-577513">Explained | Why Trump can still fight election despite Stormy Daniels hush money case indictment</a>

The trial is set to start before the three other criminal cases that the Republican frontrunner faces, and Trump would have effectively wrapped up the party’s nomination by that point. The former US president continues to lead the polls and has secured his win in four state nominating contests.&nbsp;

Cohen, who has now turned into an outspoken foe of Trump, had testified before the grand jury about making the payment and pleaded guilty in 2018.&nbsp;

<h2>Georgia case</h2>

While Trump was attending the hearing in the Manhattan court, his lawyers and allies&nbsp;on Thursday&nbsp;were attending a&nbsp;separate hearing in Atlanta,&nbsp;Georgia.

Several allies of the former president and Trump himself&nbsp;have been&nbsp;charged with trying to overturn his 2020 election loss in the US state. They sought to&nbsp;disqualify&nbsp;the prosecutor on the case, Fani Willis, over an alleged improper relationship with a lawyer on her team.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has scheduled a two-day hearing which will focus on Trump and his&nbsp;co-defendants' claims about an alleged&nbsp;romantic relationship between Willis and Nathan Wade, a lawyer she hired to help lead the prosecution.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

A New York judge on Thursday (Feb 15) denied former United States president Donald Trump’s request to dismiss criminal charges related to making hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels in return for her silence on an alleged brief affair with him.

A New York judge on Thursday (Feb 15) denied former United States president Donald Trump’s request to dismiss criminal charges related to making hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels in return for her silence on an alleged brief affair with him. The dismissal paves the way for the first-ever criminal trial of a former US president. Judge dismisses Trump’s request Justice Juan Merchan set a trial date of March 25 for the case, one of four criminal prosecutions that the White House hopeful faces on his list of many legal woes ahead of the upcoming presidential elections. The 77-year-old asked a judge in Manhattan court to toss the 34-count indictment which includes charges of accounting fraud and falsifying business records to cover up the $130,000 payment to the adult film star ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Also Read | Donald Trump launches immunity bid in US Supreme Court against Jan 6 trial The Republican frontrunner has pleaded not guilty to the charges brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat. The prosecutors have accused Trump of illegally covering up remittances to his longtime lawyer, Michael Cohen to reimburse him for payments about the Republican frontrunner’s alleged extramarital sexual relations with Daniels and a Playboy model. On Thursday, Trump’s lawyer Todd Blanche argued that the trial date was “unconstitutional,” since his client has three additional criminal trials to deal with as well as the upcoming elections. Blanche also went on to call it “election interference.” However, Judge Merchan quickly dismissed his arguments saying “He’s not going to be in more than one criminal trial at the same time.” ‘Politically motivated’ Ahead of the hearing in the Manhattan court, Trump reiterated his claims that the case is politically motivated and said “This is not a crime”. “They wouldn’t have brought this except for the fact - no way - except for the fact that I’m running for president and doing well,” the former president added. Also Read | Explained | Why Trump can still fight election despite Stormy Daniels hush money case indictment The trial is set to start before the three other criminal cases that the Republican frontrunner faces, and Trump would have effectively wrapped up the party’s nomination by that point. The former US president continues to lead the polls and has secured his win in four state nominating contests. Cohen, who has now turned into an outspoken foe of Trump, had testified before the grand jury about making the payment and pleaded guilty in 2018. Georgia case While Trump was attending the hearing in the Manhattan court, his lawyers and allies on Thursday were attending a separate hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. Several allies of the former president and Trump himself have been charged with trying to overturn his 2020 election loss in the US state. They sought to disqualify the prosecutor on the case, Fani Willis, over an alleged improper relationship with a lawyer on her team. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has scheduled a two-day hearing which will focus on Trump and his co-defendants' claims about an alleged romantic relationship between Willis and Nathan Wade, a lawyer she hired to help lead the prosecution. (With inputs from agencies)

Stormy Daniels hush money case: New York judge sets March 25 date for historic criminal trial of Trump

The special counsel prosecuting Donald Trump on federal charges involving the former president's efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to reject Trump's bid to further delay trial proceedings as he presses his claim of immunity.

"The nation has a compelling interest in seeing the charges brought to trial," Special Counsel Jack Smith said in his filing to the justices, adding that "the public interest in a prompt trial is at its zenith where, as here, a former president is charged with conspiring to subvert the electoral process so that he could remain in office."

Smith's filing responded to a request by Trump's lawyers on Monday to put on hold a decision by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejecting the claim of presidential immunity from prosecution.

If the justices do not immediately reject Trump's request, Smith asked that they take up the case and hear it on a fast-track basis.

Smith said Trump's criminal charges reflect an alleged effort to "perpetuate himself in power and prevent the lawful winner of the 2020 presidential election from taking office. The charged crimes strike at the heart of our democracy."

"A president's alleged criminal scheme to overturn an election and thwart the peaceful transfer of power to his successor should be the last place to recognize a novel form of absolute immunity from federal criminal law," Smith added.

Trump's lawyers asked the justices to halt the trial proceedings pending their bid for the full slate of judges on the D.C. Circuit to reconsider the case, and, if necessary, an appeal to the Supreme Court. Smith told the justices that granting such a request would serve only to unnecessarily postpone Trump's trial.

Trump is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden, who defeated him in 2020, in the Nov. 5 U.S. election. If the Supreme Court grants Trump's requests or otherwise does not act quickly to resolve the case, the trial could be pushed to late in the campaign or after the election.

Trump, who served in the White House from 2017 to 2021 and has become the first former president to be criminally prosecuted, has made sweeping claims of immunity both while in office and since leaving the White House.

The Supreme Court in December declined Smith's request to decide the immunity claim even before the D.C. Circuit ruled - a bid by the special counsel to speed up the process of resolving the matter. The justices opted instead to let the lower appeals court rule first, as is customary.

Smith was appointed by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2022 to investigate Trump's actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election and his retention of classified documents after leaving the White House in 2021. Smith brought charges against Trump concerning both issues.

<h2>Trial Delays</h2>

A March 4 trial date for Trump in federal court in Washington on four criminal counts pursued by Smith in the election subversion case was postponed, with no new date yet set. Trump has pleaded not guilty and has sought to portray the case as politically motivated.

Slowing the case could be to Trump's benefit. If he wins the election and returns to the White House, he could use his presidential powers to force an end to the prosecution or potentially pardon himself for any federal crimes.

Trump has appealed a decision by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Dec. 1 rejecting his bid to dismiss the case. Chutkan found no legal support for the position argued by Trump's lawyers that former presidents cannot face criminal charges for conduct related to their official responsibilities.

The charges, brought by Smith in August 2023, represent one of four criminal cases now pending against Trump.

In their filing to the Supreme Court, Trump's lawyers said a months-long criminal trial of Trump during "at the height of election season will radically disrupt" his ability to campaign against Biden. They painted a dark picture of what they said would befall future presidents if Trump's prosecution is permitted to move forward, warning of partisan prosecutions, extortion, blackmail and more.

Trump and his allies made false claims that the 2020 election was stolen and devised a plan to use false electors to thwart congressional certification of Biden's victory. Trump also sought to pressure Vice President Mike Pence not to allow certification to go forward. Trump's supporters attacked the Capitol in a bid to prevent the certification.

The indictment accused Trump of conspiring to defraud the United States, obstructing the congressional certification of Biden's electoral victory and conspiring to do so, and conspiring against right of Americans to vote.

The special counsel prosecuting Donald Trump on federal charges involving the former president's efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to reject Trump's bid to further delay trial proceedings as he presses his claim of immunity.

The special counsel prosecuting Donald Trump on federal charges involving the former president's efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to reject Trump's bid to further delay trial proceedings as he presses his claim of immunity. "The nation has a compelling interest in seeing the charges brought to trial," Special Counsel Jack Smith said in his filing to the justices, adding that "the public interest in a prompt trial is at its zenith where, as here, a former president is charged with conspiring to subvert the electoral process so that he could remain in office." Smith's filing responded to a request by Trump's lawyers on Monday to put on hold a decision by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejecting the claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. If the justices do not immediately reject Trump's request, Smith asked that they take up the case and hear it on a fast-track basis. Smith said Trump's criminal charges reflect an alleged effort to "perpetuate himself in power and prevent the lawful winner of the 2020 presidential election from taking office. The charged crimes strike at the heart of our democracy." "A president's alleged criminal scheme to overturn an election and thwart the peaceful transfer of power to his successor should be the last place to recognize a novel form of absolute immunity from federal criminal law," Smith added. Trump's lawyers asked the justices to halt the trial proceedings pending their bid for the full slate of judges on the D.C. Circuit to reconsider the case, and, if necessary, an appeal to the Supreme Court. Smith told the justices that granting such a request would serve only to unnecessarily postpone Trump's trial. Trump is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden, who defeated him in 2020, in the Nov. 5 U.S. election. If the Supreme Court grants Trump's requests or otherwise does not act quickly to resolve the case, the trial could be pushed to late in the campaign or after the election. Trump, who served in the White House from 2017 to 2021 and has become the first former president to be criminally prosecuted, has made sweeping claims of immunity both while in office and since leaving the White House. The Supreme Court in December declined Smith's request to decide the immunity claim even before the D.C. Circuit ruled - a bid by the special counsel to speed up the process of resolving the matter. The justices opted instead to let the lower appeals court rule first, as is customary. Smith was appointed by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2022 to investigate Trump's actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election and his retention of classified documents after leaving the White House in 2021. Smith brought charges against Trump concerning both issues. Trial Delays A March 4 trial date for Trump in federal court in Washington on four criminal counts pursued by Smith in the election subversion case was postponed, with no new date yet set. Trump has pleaded not guilty and has sought to portray the case as politically motivated. Slowing the case could be to Trump's benefit. If he wins the election and returns to the White House, he could use his presidential powers to force an end to the prosecution or potentially pardon himself for any federal crimes. Trump has appealed a decision by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Dec. 1 rejecting his bid to dismiss the case. Chutkan found no legal support for the position argued by Trump's lawyers that former presidents cannot face criminal charges for conduct related to their official responsibilities. The charges, brought by Smith in August 2023, represent one of four criminal cases now pending against Trump. In their filing to the Supreme Court, Trump's lawyers said a months-long criminal trial of Trump during "at the height of election season will radically disrupt" his ability to campaign against Biden. They painted a dark picture of what they said would befall future presidents if Trump's prosecution is permitted to move forward, warning of partisan prosecutions, extortion, blackmail and more. Trump and his allies made false claims that the 2020 election was stolen and devised a plan to use false electors to thwart congressional certification of Biden's victory. Trump also sought to pressure Vice President Mike Pence not to allow certification to go forward. Trump's supporters attacked the Capitol in a bid to prevent the certification. The indictment accused Trump of conspiring to defraud the United States, obstructing the congressional certification of Biden's electoral victory and conspiring to do so, and conspiring against right of Americans to vote.

Special counsel urges US Supreme Court to rebuff Trump in immunity fight

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in an on-camera interview with pro-Kremlin journalist Pavel Zarubin on Wednesday (Feb 14), said that US President Joe Biden&nbsp;is better for Russia in comparison to Donald Trump. 
 
When questioned by Zarubin regarding the upcoming US presidential election, Putin said that Biden would be better for Russia "because he is a more experienced person, he is predictable, he is a politician of an old formation". 
 
However, he said that Russia would “work with any leader of the US who gains the trust of the American people".

<h2 lang="en-US">Putin dismisses issue of Biden's age and mental health</h2>

Speaking about the questions being raised on Biden's age and mental health, he said that when they had met in 2021, he failed to notice anything peculiar. 
 
"Even then [three years ago] people were saying that he was incompetent, but I did not see anything of this sort. Yes, he kept looking at his papers, but to be honest I kept doing the same. So there was nothing peculiar,” he said.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/i-didnt-get-full-satisfaction-putin-surprised-by-lack-of-sharp-questions-during-tucker-carlson-interview-690382">'I didn't get full satisfaction': Putin surprised by lack of 'sharp questions' during Tucker Carlson interview</a>

Putin further stated that in order to judge the current administration's actions, one should understand its “political position". 
 
“I believe that the position of the current administration is extremely harmful and erroneous,” said Putin, regarding Russia’s war in Ukraine. 
 
As per&nbsp;Putin, the war “could have been over a year and a half ago” if agreements reached in a meeting in Istanbul in March 2022 were fulfilled. However, he did not specifically say what agreements he was referring to. 
 
The Russian president said that he regretted that he “didn’t start active actions in Ukraine earlier” than February 2022, claiming that Western leaders had lied to Russia about “not expanding NATO to the East".

Watch:&nbsp;Russian President Putin says he prefers Joe Biden over Donald Trump in the White House

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-president-putin-says-he-prefers-joe-biden-over-donald-trump-in-the-white-house-690483/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

“We were and are concerned about the possibility of Ukraine being drawn into NATO since this threatens our security,” said Putin. 
 
The Russian president further alleged that the Minsk agreement, which was a ceasefire protocol signed by Russia and Ukraine in 2015, was never meant to be followed but used "to buy time to load Ukraine with additional weapons". 
 
The Russian leader further expressed disappointment regarding his recent interview with former Fox presenter Tucker Carlson. 
 
“I honestly thought he would be aggressive and ask tough questions. I wasn’t only ready for that, I wanted that because it would give me the opportunity to give tough answers back,” said Putin. 
 
“To be frank, I didn’t fully enjoy that interview,” he added.

(With inputs from agencies)

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in an on-camera interview with pro-Kremlin journalist Pavel Zarubin on Wednesday (Feb 14), said that US President Joe Biden is better for Russia in comparison to Donald Trump.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in an on-camera interview with pro-Kremlin journalist Pavel Zarubin on Wednesday (Feb 14), said that US President Joe Biden is better for Russia in comparison to Donald Trump. When questioned by Zarubin regarding the upcoming US presidential election, Putin said that Biden would be better for Russia "because he is a more experienced person, he is predictable, he is a politician of an old formation". However, he said that Russia would “work with any leader of the US who gains the trust of the American people". Putin dismisses issue of Biden's age and mental health Speaking about the questions being raised on Biden's age and mental health, he said that when they had met in 2021, he failed to notice anything peculiar. "Even then [three years ago] people were saying that he was incompetent, but I did not see anything of this sort. Yes, he kept looking at his papers, but to be honest I kept doing the same. So there was nothing peculiar,” he said. Also Read: 'I didn't get full satisfaction': Putin surprised by lack of 'sharp questions' during Tucker Carlson interview Putin further stated that in order to judge the current administration's actions, one should understand its “political position". “I believe that the position of the current administration is extremely harmful and erroneous,” said Putin, regarding Russia’s war in Ukraine. As per Putin, the war “could have been over a year and a half ago” if agreements reached in a meeting in Istanbul in March 2022 were fulfilled. However, he did not specifically say what agreements he was referring to. The Russian president said that he regretted that he “didn’t start active actions in Ukraine earlier” than February 2022, claiming that Western leaders had lied to Russia about “not expanding NATO to the East". Watch: Russian President Putin says he prefers Joe Biden over Donald Trump in the White House “We were and are concerned about the possibility of Ukraine being drawn into NATO since this threatens our security,” said Putin. The Russian president further alleged that the Minsk agreement, which was a ceasefire protocol signed by Russia and Ukraine in 2015, was never meant to be followed but used "to buy time to load Ukraine with additional weapons". The Russian leader further expressed disappointment regarding his recent interview with former Fox presenter Tucker Carlson. “I honestly thought he would be aggressive and ask tough questions. I wasn’t only ready for that, I wanted that because it would give me the opportunity to give tough answers back,” said Putin. “To be frank, I didn’t fully enjoy that interview,” he added. (With inputs from agencies)

Putin says he prefers Joe Biden's presidency over Trump in White House

US President Joe Biden on Tuesday (Feb 13) once again slammed his predecessor Donald Trump for his comments regarding NATO. The Republican leader had said he would 'encourage Russia to attack allies' if they failed to fulfil their financial obligations to the military coalition. In other news, Indonesia went to presidential polls early in the morning&nbsp;in what is being regarded as&nbsp;the world's biggest single-day election

Click on headlines to read more:&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-president-biden-calls-trumps-criticism-of-nato-as-dumb-shameful-690064">US President Biden calls Trump’s criticism of NATO as ‘dumb’, ‘shameful’</a>

United States President Joe Biden launched a scathing attack on former president Donald Trump for his criticism of NATO, calling it "dumb", "shameful" and "un-American".

<img alt="main img" src="https://cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/styles/story_page/public/2024/02/14/412001-untitled-design-59.png?imwidth=500" />

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/indonesia-votes-to-choose-next-president-in-worlds-biggest-single-day-election-690052">Indonesia votes to choose next president in world's biggest single-day election</a>

Millions of Indonesians geared up to reach the polling booths&nbsp;early on Wednesday (Feb 14) morning to vote for the next president as&nbsp;Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto took the lead in various opinion polls.&nbsp;

<img alt="main img" src="https://cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/styles/story_page/public/2024/02/14/411991-untitled-design.png?imwidth=500" />

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bidens-homeland-security-chief-alejandro-mayorkas-impeached-in-republican-majority-house-690050">Biden's Homeland security chief Alejandro Mayorkas impeached in Republican-majority House</a>

The Republican-majority US House of Representatives on Tuesday (Feb 13) impeached Homeland Security Chief Alejandro Mayorkas. The&nbsp;GOP-majority House&nbsp;voted 214 to 213 for the measure, after an earlier attempt failed last week.

<img alt="main img" src="https://cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/styles/story_page/public/2024/02/07/410489-untitled-design.png?imwidth=500" />

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-defense-secretary-lloyd-austin-released-from-hospital-690049">US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin released from hospital, resumes work: Pentagon</a>

US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin has been released from hospital and has resumed his duties, informed the Pentagon on Tuesday (Feb 13).&nbsp;

<img alt="main img" src="https://cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/styles/story_page/public/2022/10/03/300787-2022-10-02t143524z1lynxmpei91070rtroptp4india-usa-pakistan.JPG?imwidth=500" />

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-senate-passes-95-billion-ukraine-aid-bill-sends-to-house-690070">Watch |&nbsp;US Senate passes $95 billion Ukraine aid bill, sends to House</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-senate-passes-95-billion-ukraine-aid-bill-sends-to-house-690070/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

US President Joe Biden on Tuesday (Feb 13) once again slammed his predecessor Donald Trump for his comments regarding NATO. The Republican leader had said he would 'encourage Russia to attack allies' if they failed to fulfil their financial obligations to the military coalition.

US President Joe Biden on Tuesday (Feb 13) once again slammed his predecessor Donald Trump for his comments regarding NATO. The Republican leader had said he would 'encourage Russia to attack allies' if they failed to fulfil their financial obligations to the military coalition. In other news, Indonesia went to presidential polls early in the morning in what is being regarded as the world's biggest single-day election Click on headlines to read more: US President Biden calls Trump’s criticism of NATO as ‘dumb’, ‘shameful’ United States President Joe Biden launched a scathing attack on former president Donald Trump for his criticism of NATO, calling it "dumb", "shameful" and "un-American". Indonesia votes to choose next president in world's biggest single-day election Millions of Indonesians geared up to reach the polling booths early on Wednesday (Feb 14) morning to vote for the next president as Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto took the lead in various opinion polls. Biden's Homeland security chief Alejandro Mayorkas impeached in Republican-majority House The Republican-majority US House of Representatives on Tuesday (Feb 13) impeached Homeland Security Chief Alejandro Mayorkas. The GOP-majority House voted 214 to 213 for the measure, after an earlier attempt failed last week. US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin released from hospital, resumes work: Pentagon US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin has been released from hospital and has resumed his duties, informed the Pentagon on Tuesday (Feb 13). Watch | US Senate passes $95 billion Ukraine aid bill, sends to House ×

Morning news brief: Biden criticises Trump over NATO comments; Indonesia votes for new prez, and more

United States President Joe Biden launched a scathing attack on former president Donald Trump for his criticism of NATO, calling it "dumb", "shameful" and "un-American".

The Democrat assailed his likely 2024 challenger for stating that he will “encourage” Russia to launch an attack on a NATO member nation that fails to meet its defence spending quota.&nbsp;

Biden said that Trump’s remarks emphasised the need for passing a $95bn foreign aid package for US allies.

The bill had just passed the Senate, however, it still has been facing political headwinds in the House.&nbsp;

At the White House on Tuesday (Feb 13), Biden said that a failure to clear the package, which includes $60bn for Ukraine, will be "playing into Putin's hands".

He added that the stakes have increased because of Trump’s “dangerous” remarks which he made over the weekend.&nbsp;

"No other president in history has ever bowed down to a Russian dictator," Biden said.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-what-did-trump-allege-about-nato-spending-and-how-the-international-organisation-is-funded-689908">Explained | What did Trump allege about NATO spending and how the international organisation is funded?</a>

"Let me say this as clearly as I can. I never will. For God's sake. It's dumb. It's shameful. It's dangerous. It's un-American,” he added.&nbsp;

Biden claimed that his predecessor has been treating the military alliance like a protection racket.

"As long as I'm president, if Putin attacks a Nato ally, the United States will defend every inch of Nato territory,” he said.&nbsp;

Biden said that the only time when Nato invoked Article 5, which is part of the organisation’s charter which states that an attack on any member state will be considered an attack on the entire group, was after the 9/11 attacks.&nbsp;

In a message, which was aimed at House Republicans, President Biden said: "Are you going to stand with Ukraine or are you going to stand with Putin? Will you stand with America or Trump?"

<h2>What accusations did Trump level against NATO?&nbsp;</h2>

Donald Trump, who served as the US president from 2017-21, often lambasted NATO and its members like Germany, while accusing them of failing to pay enough for their own defence and depending on the US for their protection.&nbsp;

He has also questioned the collective defence principle openly. Meanwhile, the Europeans have also been accused by other US administrators of failing to spend enough on defence.

Watch:&nbsp;US President Joe Biden joins TikTok ahead of 2024 election

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-joe-biden-joins-tiktok-ahead-of-2024-election-689624/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Taking his criticism to the next level during a campaign rally on Saturday (Feb 11) in Conway, South Carolina, Trump recounted what he said regarding a conversation with the "president of a big country".

"Well sir, if we don't pay, and we're attacked by Russia - will you protect us?" Trump quoted the unnamed leader as speaking.

"I said: 'You didn't pay? You're delinquent?' He said: 'Yes, let's say that happened.' No, I would not protect you. I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay," he said.

(With inputs from agencies)

United States President Joe Biden launched a scathing attack on former president Donald Trump for his criticism of NATO, calling it "dumb", "shameful" and "un-American".

United States President Joe Biden launched a scathing attack on former president Donald Trump for his criticism of NATO, calling it "dumb", "shameful" and "un-American". The Democrat assailed his likely 2024 challenger for stating that he will “encourage” Russia to launch an attack on a NATO member nation that fails to meet its defence spending quota. Biden said that Trump’s remarks emphasised the need for passing a $95bn foreign aid package for US allies. The bill had just passed the Senate, however, it still has been facing political headwinds in the House. At the White House on Tuesday (Feb 13), Biden said that a failure to clear the package, which includes $60bn for Ukraine, will be "playing into Putin's hands". He added that the stakes have increased because of Trump’s “dangerous” remarks which he made over the weekend. "No other president in history has ever bowed down to a Russian dictator," Biden said. Also Read: Explained | What did Trump allege about NATO spending and how the international organisation is funded? "Let me say this as clearly as I can. I never will. For God's sake. It's dumb. It's shameful. It's dangerous. It's un-American,” he added. Biden claimed that his predecessor has been treating the military alliance like a protection racket. "As long as I'm president, if Putin attacks a Nato ally, the United States will defend every inch of Nato territory,” he said. Biden said that the only time when Nato invoked Article 5, which is part of the organisation’s charter which states that an attack on any member state will be considered an attack on the entire group, was after the 9/11 attacks. In a message, which was aimed at House Republicans, President Biden said: "Are you going to stand with Ukraine or are you going to stand with Putin? Will you stand with America or Trump?" What accusations did Trump level against NATO? Donald Trump, who served as the US president from 2017-21, often lambasted NATO and its members like Germany, while accusing them of failing to pay enough for their own defence and depending on the US for their protection. He has also questioned the collective defence principle openly. Meanwhile, the Europeans have also been accused by other US administrators of failing to spend enough on defence. Watch: US President Joe Biden joins TikTok ahead of 2024 election Taking his criticism to the next level during a campaign rally on Saturday (Feb 11) in Conway, South Carolina, Trump recounted what he said regarding a conversation with the "president of a big country". "Well sir, if we don't pay, and we're attacked by Russia - will you protect us?" Trump quoted the unnamed leader as speaking. "I said: 'You didn't pay? You're delinquent?' He said: 'Yes, let's say that happened.' No, I would not protect you. I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay," he said. (With inputs from agencies)

US President Biden calls Trump’s criticism of NATO ‘dumb’, ‘shameful’

In the United States, Republicans are planning hearings in congress to focus on President Joe Biden’s age and memory lapses in an attempt to weaponise one of his key vulnerabilities. According to an Axios report, republicans are expanding their impeachment inquiry against the bidens. So far, it has focused on his son hunter biden’s business dealings.

Republicans focus on Biden's key vulnerability ahead of polls

NATO chief, on Wednesday (Feb 14) said Europe had increased its spending on defence with 18 out of the alliance’s 31 countries expected to hit their target this year. This comes days after former United States president Donald Trump implied he would not defend the NATO allies who have not been able to spend enough on defence and would also encourage Russia to attack them.&nbsp;

<h2>NATO chief about nations’ defence spending</h2>

“I expect 18 allies to spend 2% of their GDP on defence this year,” said NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg during a press conference. This year’s number is also up from 11 NATO members who were expected to reach the agreed target in 2023.

WATCH |&nbsp;Trump to NATO: Pay financial obligations or face consequences

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-to-nato-pay-financial-obligations-or-face-consequences-689552/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Stoltenberg also said that overall military spending was set for another record high nearly two years after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.&nbsp;

The former US president and Republican frontrunner sparked outrage after suggesting that he would allow Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to NATO countries that didn’t fulfil their financial obligations to the alliance.&nbsp;

Trump’s remarks have since garnered criticism from not only his successor but also leaders of other countries and the NATO chief.&nbsp;

During the press conference, when asked about the former US president’s comment, Stoltenberg said the United States knew how important the defence alliance is for its own security.

“The United States have never fought a war alone,” said the NATO chief. He added, “The criticism we hear is not about NATO, it is about NATO allies not spending enough on NATO.”

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-president-and-nato-chief-slam-trump-over-his-encouraging-russia-to-attack-allies-remarks-689314">US president and NATO chief slam Trump over his 'encouraging Russia to attack allies' remark</a>

Stoltenberg also noted that the new hike in military spending by European allies was proof this message had been heard. He added, NATO’s European states would invest a combined total of $380 billion in defence this year.&nbsp;

<h2>Germany hits two per cent NATO spending target</h2>

On Wednesday, Germany’s defence ministry spokesperson said that the country has met its target to spend two per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence for the first time since the early 1990s, the end of the Cold War.&nbsp;

As per Reuters, the German government has allocated around $76.8 billion for defence spending in the current year through regular and special budget outlays. However, the sum of its total defence spending is classified.

On Tuesday evening, responding to Trump’s remarks, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said that the former US president risked damaging transatlantic relations and could “ultimately saw off the branch on which America is sitting.”&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-what-did-trump-allege-about-nato-spending-and-how-the-international-organisation-is-funded-689908">Explained | What did Trump allege about NATO spending and how the international organisation is funded?</a>

He also pushed back against the idea of creating a separate European nuclear defence umbrella. “I can only warn against starting such a discussion with such carelessness just because Donald Trump, who is not even a presidential candidate, makes such statements,” said Pistorius.&nbsp;

<h2>What did Trump say?</h2>

During a campaign rally on Saturday (Feb 11) in South Carolina, Trump recounted what he said regarding a conversation with the “president of a big country”.

“Well sir, if we don’t pay, and we’re attacked by Russia - will you protect us?” Trump quoted the unnamed leader as speaking.

“I said: ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?’ He said: ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you. I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay,” he said.

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

NATO chief, on Wednesday (Feb 14) said Europe had increased its spending on defence with 18 out of the alliance’s 31 countries expected to hit their target this year.

NATO chief, on Wednesday (Feb 14) said Europe had increased its spending on defence with 18 out of the alliance’s 31 countries expected to hit their target this year. This comes days after former United States president Donald Trump implied he would not defend the NATO allies who have not been able to spend enough on defence and would also encourage Russia to attack them. NATO chief about nations’ defence spending “I expect 18 allies to spend 2% of their GDP on defence this year,” said NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg during a press conference. This year’s number is also up from 11 NATO members who were expected to reach the agreed target in 2023. WATCH | Trump to NATO: Pay financial obligations or face consequences Stoltenberg also said that overall military spending was set for another record high nearly two years after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The former US president and Republican frontrunner sparked outrage after suggesting that he would allow Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to NATO countries that didn’t fulfil their financial obligations to the alliance. Trump’s remarks have since garnered criticism from not only his successor but also leaders of other countries and the NATO chief. During the press conference, when asked about the former US president’s comment, Stoltenberg said the United States knew how important the defence alliance is for its own security. “The United States have never fought a war alone,” said the NATO chief. He added, “The criticism we hear is not about NATO, it is about NATO allies not spending enough on NATO.” ALSO READ | US president and NATO chief slam Trump over his 'encouraging Russia to attack allies' remark Stoltenberg also noted that the new hike in military spending by European allies was proof this message had been heard. He added, NATO’s European states would invest a combined total of $380 billion in defence this year. Germany hits two per cent NATO spending target On Wednesday, Germany’s defence ministry spokesperson said that the country has met its target to spend two per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence for the first time since the early 1990s, the end of the Cold War. As per Reuters, the German government has allocated around $76.8 billion for defence spending in the current year through regular and special budget outlays. However, the sum of its total defence spending is classified. On Tuesday evening, responding to Trump’s remarks, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said that the former US president risked damaging transatlantic relations and could “ultimately saw off the branch on which America is sitting.” ALSO READ | Explained | What did Trump allege about NATO spending and how the international organisation is funded? He also pushed back against the idea of creating a separate European nuclear defence umbrella. “I can only warn against starting such a discussion with such carelessness just because Donald Trump, who is not even a presidential candidate, makes such statements,” said Pistorius. What did Trump say? During a campaign rally on Saturday (Feb 11) in South Carolina, Trump recounted what he said regarding a conversation with the “president of a big country”. “Well sir, if we don’t pay, and we’re attacked by Russia - will you protect us?” Trump quoted the unnamed leader as speaking. “I said: ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?’ He said: ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you. I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay,” he said. (With inputs from agencies)

NATO chief says 18 countries are expected to hit their defence spending target after Trump’s remarks

United States former president Donald Trump faced a lot of criticism from top Western officials and the White House after he said that he would not defend the NATO allies who have not been able to spend enough on defence and would also encourage Russia to attack them.

Trump is running for another presidential term in the White House against President Joe Biden in November.

<h2>What is NATO?&nbsp;</h2>

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), which was founded in 1946 to counter the Soviet Union amid increasing Cold War tensions, is a political and military alliance of nations from Europe and North America.&nbsp;

The group's founding treaty, which has been enshrined in Article 5, is the principle of collective defence and propagates the idea that if one of its members is attacked, it will be considered an attack on the entire group.&nbsp;

All the decisions within NATO are taken after countries reach a consensus and the United States' political and military strength means that it is by far the alliance's most powerful country and its nuclear arsenal is perceived as the ultimate security guarantee.

<h2>Which countries are part of NATO?&nbsp;</h2>

Currently, NATO has 31 members, most of whom are European countries. The United States and Canada are also part of the NATO.

Finland is the newest member of NATO which joined the organisation last April after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Sweden has also applied for membership but it awaits ratification of its application.&nbsp;

<h2>What accusations did Trump levy on NATO?&nbsp;</h2>

Donald Trump, who served as the US president from 2017-21, often lambasted NATO and its members like Germany, while accusing them of failing to pay enough for their own defence and depending on the US for their protection.&nbsp;

He has also questioned the collective defence principle openly. Meanwhile, the Europeans have also been accused by other US administrators of failing to spend enough on defence.

Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-once-ordered-the-us-to-withdraw-from-nato-if-re-elected-he-may-execute-it-report-689716">&nbsp;Trump once ordered the US to withdraw from NATO, if re-elected he may execute it: Report</a>

Taking his criticism to the next level during a campaign rally on Saturday (Feb 11) in Conway, South Carolina, Trump recounted what he said regarding a conversation with the "president of a big country".

"Well sir, if we don't pay, and we're attacked by Russia - will you protect us?" Trump quoted the unnamed leader as speaking.

"I said: 'You didn't pay? You're delinquent?' He said: 'Yes, let's say that happened.' No, I would not protect you. I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay," he said.

<h2>How does NATO receive its funding?&nbsp;</h2>

The NATO members have often been accused by Trump of not paying their dues which gave the impression of the alliance being similar to a club which has membership fees.

However, NATO operates differently. The organisation has some common funds to which all members contribute.&nbsp;

The organisation's vast bulk of strength comes from the national defence spending of the members. The national defence spending of member countries is used in maintaining forces and buying arms which can also be used by NATO.

The NATO members have committed to spend at least 2 per cent of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the defence sector every year. However, most of them failed to meet that goal even in 2023.&nbsp;

<h2>How many NATO members reach the defence spending target?</h2>

As per the estimates by NATO in July last year, 11 members were most likely to meet the 2 per cent target in 2023. These members include&nbsp;Poland, the United States, Greece, Estonia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania, Hungary, Latvia, Britain and Slovakia.

Europe's economic heavyweight - Germany - was most likely to spend 1.57 per cent on defence. However, the German officials claimed that they were hoping to meet the 2 per cent target, especially due to a special 1-billion-euro fund which was established in response to Russia's war in Ukraine.

According to NATO figures, the countries which contributed the lowest shares of their GDP on defence were Spain, Belgium and Luxembourg.&nbsp;

Meanwhile,&nbsp;NATO's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at a press conference on Wednesday (Feb 14) said, "I expect 18 allies to spend 2% of their GDP on defence this year."&nbsp;

<h2>What is NATO's Article 5?</h2>

In the founding treaty's Article 5, NATO members announced that an armed attack against one or more of them either in North America or Europe "shall be considered an attack against them all".

The nations agreed that they would "assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force".

Watch:&nbsp;Donald Trump defiant after backlash over NATO remarks

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/donald-trump-defiant-after-backlash-over-nato-remarks-689709/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Article 5, however, falls short of a commitment to an automatic military response for helping an ally under attack.&nbsp;

The comments made by Trump caused a furore because the statements were made at a time when there was heightened alarm in NATO regarding Russia's intentions after its invasion of Ukraine.&nbsp;

By stating that he would not take any military action to defend an ally, Trump undermined the claims in Article 5.&nbsp;

"Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the U.S., and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk," said NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, on Sunday (Feb 11).&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

United States former president Donald Trump faced a lot of criticism from top Western officials and the White House after he said that he would not defend the NATO allies who have not been able to spend enough on defence and would also encourage Russia to attack them.

United States former president Donald Trump faced a lot of criticism from top Western officials and the White House after he said that he would not defend the NATO allies who have not been able to spend enough on defence and would also encourage Russia to attack them. Trump is running for another presidential term in the White House against President Joe Biden in November. What is NATO? The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), which was founded in 1946 to counter the Soviet Union amid increasing Cold War tensions, is a political and military alliance of nations from Europe and North America. The group's founding treaty, which has been enshrined in Article 5, is the principle of collective defence and propagates the idea that if one of its members is attacked, it will be considered an attack on the entire group. All the decisions within NATO are taken after countries reach a consensus and the United States' political and military strength means that it is by far the alliance's most powerful country and its nuclear arsenal is perceived as the ultimate security guarantee. Which countries are part of NATO? Currently, NATO has 31 members, most of whom are European countries. The United States and Canada are also part of the NATO. Finland is the newest member of NATO which joined the organisation last April after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Sweden has also applied for membership but it awaits ratification of its application. What accusations did Trump levy on NATO? Donald Trump, who served as the US president from 2017-21, often lambasted NATO and its members like Germany, while accusing them of failing to pay enough for their own defence and depending on the US for their protection. He has also questioned the collective defence principle openly. Meanwhile, the Europeans have also been accused by other US administrators of failing to spend enough on defence. Also Read: Trump once ordered the US to withdraw from NATO, if re-elected he may execute it: Report Taking his criticism to the next level during a campaign rally on Saturday (Feb 11) in Conway, South Carolina, Trump recounted what he said regarding a conversation with the "president of a big country". "Well sir, if we don't pay, and we're attacked by Russia - will you protect us?" Trump quoted the unnamed leader as speaking. "I said: 'You didn't pay? You're delinquent?' He said: 'Yes, let's say that happened.' No, I would not protect you. I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay," he said. How does NATO receive its funding? The NATO members have often been accused by Trump of not paying their dues which gave the impression of the alliance being similar to a club which has membership fees. However, NATO operates differently. The organisation has some common funds to which all members contribute. The organisation's vast bulk of strength comes from the national defence spending of the members. The national defence spending of member countries is used in maintaining forces and buying arms which can also be used by NATO. The NATO members have committed to spend at least 2 per cent of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the defence sector every year. However, most of them failed to meet that goal even in 2023. How many NATO members reach the defence spending target? As per the estimates by NATO in July last year, 11 members were most likely to meet the 2 per cent target in 2023. These members include Poland, the United States, Greece, Estonia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania, Hungary, Latvia, Britain and Slovakia. Europe's economic heavyweight - Germany - was most likely to spend 1.57 per cent on defence. However, the German officials claimed that they were hoping to meet the 2 per cent target, especially due to a special 1-billion-euro fund which was established in response to Russia's war in Ukraine. According to NATO figures, the countries which contributed the lowest shares of their GDP on defence were Spain, Belgium and Luxembourg. Meanwhile, NATO's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at a press conference on Wednesday (Feb 14) said, "I expect 18 allies to spend 2% of their GDP on defence this year." What is NATO's Article 5? In the founding treaty's Article 5, NATO members announced that an armed attack against one or more of them either in North America or Europe "shall be considered an attack against them all". The nations agreed that they would "assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force". Watch: Donald Trump defiant after backlash over NATO remarks Article 5, however, falls short of a commitment to an automatic military response for helping an ally under attack. The comments made by Trump caused a furore because the statements were made at a time when there was heightened alarm in NATO regarding Russia's intentions after its invasion of Ukraine. By stating that he would not take any military action to defend an ally, Trump undermined the claims in Article 5. "Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the U.S., and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk," said NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, on Sunday (Feb 11). (With inputs from agencies)

Explained | What did Trump allege about NATO spending and how the international organisation is funded?

Former US President Donald Trump will seek to formally withdraw the United States from NATO if he returns to power, claimed CNN journalist Jim Sciutto in his book 'The Return of Great Powers' after citing multiple former White House advisors to Donald Trump.

"NATO would be in real jeopardy," John Bolton, former US national security advisor in the Trump administration was quoted as saying by Scuitto on CNN.

"I think he would try to get out."

Also watch |&nbsp;NATO Chief: Trump comments undermine all of our security

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-chief-trump-comments-undermine-all-of-our-security-689602/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Not just NATO, Trump also does not want to keep US troops in South Korea and Japan, retired General John Kelly, a former chief of staff to Donald Trump was quoted as saying in the book, CNN reported.

"The point is, he saw absolutely no point in NATO," Kelly reportedly said in the book. "He was just dead set against having troops in South Korea, again, a deterrent force, or having troops in Japan, a deterrent force."

<h2>Donald Trump's opinion on Putin and Kim Jong Un</h2>

According to John Kelly, Trump believed Putin and Kim Jong Un to be "okay" guys.&nbsp;

"He thought (Vladimir) Putin was an okay guy and Kim (Jong Un) was an okay guy, ­that we had pushed North Korea into a corner," Kelly recalled. "To him, it was like we were goading these guys. 'If we didn't have NATO, then Putin wouldn’t be doing these things.'"

The book claims that Trump very nearly removed the United States from NATO at the alliance's 2018 summit in Brussels.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/donald-trump-says-he-warned-nato-ally-spend-more-on-defence-or-face-consequences-689463">Donald Trump says he warned NATO ally: Spend more on defence or face consequences</a>

"He was always ranting and raving and jumping up and down, and oftentimes he would spin up in terms of, 'Well, I'm smarter than they are,' and all of this," Kelly said, describing Trump’s mindset in Brussels.&nbsp;

A former senior US official reportedly&nbsp;told the author that Trump issued orders to then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley and then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper for the US to withdraw from NATO.&nbsp;

They reportedly considered the president's direction a "lawful order” and drew up plans to execute the withdrawal.

Bolton recalled the 2018 summit to the author. "Honest to God, it was frightening because we didn’t know what he was going to do up until the last minute. And I mean, I think, he all but said he was going to get out of NATO and then pulled back on it," said Bolton.

(With inputs from agencies)

Former US President Donald Trump will seek to formally withdraw the United States from NATO if he returns to power, claimed CNN journalist Jim Sciutto in his book 'The Return of Great Powers' after citing multiple former White House advisors to Donald Trump.

Former US President Donald Trump will seek to formally withdraw the United States from NATO if he returns to power, claimed CNN journalist Jim Sciutto in his book 'The Return of Great Powers' after citing multiple former White House advisors to Donald Trump. "NATO would be in real jeopardy," John Bolton, former US national security advisor in the Trump administration was quoted as saying by Scuitto on CNN. "I think he would try to get out." Also watch | NATO Chief: Trump comments undermine all of our security × Not just NATO, Trump also does not want to keep US troops in South Korea and Japan, retired General John Kelly, a former chief of staff to Donald Trump was quoted as saying in the book, CNN reported. "The point is, he saw absolutely no point in NATO," Kelly reportedly said in the book. "He was just dead set against having troops in South Korea, again, a deterrent force, or having troops in Japan, a deterrent force." Donald Trump's opinion on Putin and Kim Jong Un According to John Kelly, Trump believed Putin and Kim Jong Un to be "okay" guys. "He thought (Vladimir) Putin was an okay guy and Kim (Jong Un) was an okay guy, that we had pushed North Korea into a corner," Kelly recalled. "To him, it was like we were goading these guys. 'If we didn't have NATO, then Putin wouldn’t be doing these things.'" The book claims that Trump very nearly removed the United States from NATO at the alliance's 2018 summit in Brussels. Also read | Donald Trump says he warned NATO ally: Spend more on defence or face consequences "He was always ranting and raving and jumping up and down, and oftentimes he would spin up in terms of, 'Well, I'm smarter than they are,' and all of this," Kelly said, describing Trump’s mindset in Brussels. A former senior US official reportedly told the author that Trump issued orders to then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley and then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper for the US to withdraw from NATO. They reportedly considered the president's direction a "lawful order” and drew up plans to execute the withdrawal. Bolton recalled the 2018 summit to the author. "Honest to God, it was frightening because we didn’t know what he was going to do up until the last minute. And I mean, I think, he all but said he was going to get out of NATO and then pulled back on it," said Bolton. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump once ordered the US to withdraw from NATO, if re-elected he may execute it: Report

Former US President to drop federal charges against him. Trump is back at the Supreme Court pressing his claim of total immunity from Criminal prosecution over the Capitol Hill rights on the 6th of January. This comes 4 days after justices heard arguments in his quest to be restored at the Colorado ballot, and according to reports Trump's legal team has filed an emergency appeal with the court on Monday his team is also pestering to delay his criminal trial until after the 2024 Presidential Elections. Ex-US President asked apex court to intervene on immunity claim. Watch to know more!

US: Donald Trump asks apex court to intervene on immunity claim

Former US President Donald Trump is calling for a leadership change at the Republican National Committee. He has endorsed Michael Whatley, chair of North Carolina's Republican Party to head the committee. For the co-chair, he is backing none other than, his daughter-in-law Lara Trump.

Trump endorses Lara Trump, Michael Whatley for RNC chairs

After sparking a firestorm of criticism over comments downplaying his commitment to NATO, Donald Trump defended his record on the alliance saying he had made it stronger. Watch in for more details!

Donald Trump defiant after backlash over NATO remarks

Former United States President Donald Trump, on Monday (Feb 12) attended a closed hearing at a federal courthouse in the state of Florida for the criminal case against him over the alleged mishandling of classified documents.&nbsp;

<h2>Trump attends hearing</h2>

The lawyers representing Trump and special counsel Jack Smith argued who would have access to top-secret evidence?&nbsp;The former president’s motorcade arrived at the Fort Pierce courthouse around 9:00 am (local time), where a group of supporters holding posters greeted them.

This was also the first time that the former president met face-to-face with US District Judge <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-aileen-cannon-trump-appointed-judge-in-classified-documents-case-602926">Aileen Cannon</a>. The judge first heard from the defence lawyers and then from the prosecutors in two separate hearings.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/biden-willfully-retained-classified-documents-but-no-criminal-charges-warranted-special-counsel-688431">Biden 'willfully retained' classified documents, but no criminal charges warranted: Special counsel</a>

Trump left around five hours later, with his supporters playing his campaign song “God Bless the USA”. However, he did not speak to the reporters or his supporters gathered at the courthouse.&nbsp;

Notably, this hearing was one of the several voluntary court dates that the former president has attended in recent weeks.&nbsp;

Trump was not required to attend the session on Monday but did so in an apparent bid to show his supporters that he intends to fight his criminal prosecutions during his campaign to win the White House in November.&nbsp;

<h2>About the case and the hearing</h2>

Trump appeared in court on Monday to attend a hearing related to the classified documents case where he has been charged with 40 counts, including unlawfully retaining national defence-related material, conspiracy to obstruct justice and making false statements.

Two employees, property manager Carlos de Oliveira and Trump personal assistant Waltine Nauta have also been charged in the case.

Judge Cannon heard from both sides as the former president’s lawyers have sought to gain access to the classified evidence&nbsp;which is currently in&nbsp;possession of the prosecutors. However, the government’s attorneys have opposed the move given the sensitivity of the information.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/special-counsel-smith-and-other-will-be-in-mental-asylum-if-im-re-elected-trump-658250">Special Counsel Smith and others will be in mental asylum if I'm re-elected: Trump</a>

Notably, court cases involving classified evidence such as this require careful oversight by the judge to ensure that the defence teams have access to evidence to prepare for the case while also protecting national security secrets.&nbsp;

Trump’s lawyers “shall be prepared to discuss their defense theories of the case, in detail, and how any classified information might be relevant or helpful to the defense,” Cannon said in a court document.

The former president, who pleaded not guilty in June to the charges, will go on trial on May 20. However, Cannon is expected to take a call in March on whether the trial can go forward in May as scheduled or not. &nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

Former United States President Donald Trump, on Monday (Feb 12) attended a closed hearing at a federal courthouse in the state of Florida for the criminal case against him over the alleged mishandling of classified documents.

Former United States President Donald Trump, on Monday (Feb 12) attended a closed hearing at a federal courthouse in the state of Florida for the criminal case against him over the alleged mishandling of classified documents. Trump attends hearing The lawyers representing Trump and special counsel Jack Smith argued who would have access to top-secret evidence? The former president’s motorcade arrived at the Fort Pierce courthouse around 9:00 am (local time), where a group of supporters holding posters greeted them. This was also the first time that the former president met face-to-face with US District Judge Aileen Cannon. The judge first heard from the defence lawyers and then from the prosecutors in two separate hearings. ALSO READ | Biden 'willfully retained' classified documents, but no criminal charges warranted: Special counsel Trump left around five hours later, with his supporters playing his campaign song “God Bless the USA”. However, he did not speak to the reporters or his supporters gathered at the courthouse. Notably, this hearing was one of the several voluntary court dates that the former president has attended in recent weeks. Trump was not required to attend the session on Monday but did so in an apparent bid to show his supporters that he intends to fight his criminal prosecutions during his campaign to win the White House in November. About the case and the hearing Trump appeared in court on Monday to attend a hearing related to the classified documents case where he has been charged with 40 counts, including unlawfully retaining national defence-related material, conspiracy to obstruct justice and making false statements. Two employees, property manager Carlos de Oliveira and Trump personal assistant Waltine Nauta have also been charged in the case. Judge Cannon heard from both sides as the former president’s lawyers have sought to gain access to the classified evidence which is currently in possession of the prosecutors. However, the government’s attorneys have opposed the move given the sensitivity of the information. ALSO READ | Special Counsel Smith and others will be in mental asylum if I'm re-elected: Trump Notably, court cases involving classified evidence such as this require careful oversight by the judge to ensure that the defence teams have access to evidence to prepare for the case while also protecting national security secrets. Trump’s lawyers “shall be prepared to discuss their defense theories of the case, in detail, and how any classified information might be relevant or helpful to the defense,” Cannon said in a court document. The former president, who pleaded not guilty in June to the charges, will go on trial on May 20. However, Cannon is expected to take a call in March on whether the trial can go forward in May as scheduled or not. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump classified documents case: Former US president attends closed-door hearing in federal court in Florida

US: Donald Trump asks Supreme Court to pause election subversion case

Former US President Donald Trump on Feb 12 (Monday) asked the US Supreme Court to pause a ruling by a lower court which said that he does not have presidential immunity from criminal prosecution against his bid to overturn the 2020 US presidential election results.&nbsp;

The lower court in this matter is the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit which previously rejected his immunity claim.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-classified-documents-case-former-us-president-attends-closed-door-hearing-in-federal-court-in-florida-689671">Trump classified documents case: Former US president attends closed-door hearing in federal court in Florida</a>

A March 4 trial date for Trump in federal court in Washington on four criminal counts pursued by Special Counsel Jack Smith was postponed, with no new date yet set.

<h2>Why Trump believes he shouldn't be prosecuted?</h2>

Trump has claimed that he could not be tried for acts carried out as president. But a total of three lower court judges have previously ruled that Trump can be prosecuted like any other citizen.&nbsp;

<h2>What does a potential criminal prosecution mean for Donald Trump?</h2>

Donald Trump, by all counts and analysis, is the frontrunner for a presidential ticket from the Republican Party for US elections scheduled to be held in November 2024.&nbsp;

"Conducting a months-long criminal trial of President Trump at the height of election season will radically disrupt President Trump's ability to campaign against President Biden," Trump's lawyers wrote in the filing.

Also watch |&nbsp;US: Donald Trump's trial reaches its climax after clashes with the judge

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-donald-trumps-trial-reaches-its-climax-after-clashes-with-the-judge-679183/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"Without immunity from criminal prosecution, the Presidency as we know it will cease to exist," Trump's lawyers added.

<h2>What next for Donald Trump?</h2>

The US Supreme Court will now rule if or not Trump's bid to invoke&nbsp;presidential immunity for the acts purportedly committed during his presidential tenure is admissible in the context of events of Jan 6, 2020, or not.&nbsp;&nbsp;

There could be two possible scenarios.

One, if the US Supreme Court rules that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 elections since it happened when he was still the president. In this case, there will be a long delay in the election interference case possibly until the November elections.&nbsp;

Two, if the US Supreme Court rules that Trump should be prosecuted in the election interference case.&nbsp;

In that case, the federal trial in the case will be heard in the immediate future.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Former US President Donald Trump on Feb 12 (Monday) asked the US Supreme Court to pause a ruling by a lower court which said that he does not have presidential immunity from criminal prosecution against his bid to overturn the 2020 US presidential election results.

Former US President Donald Trump on Feb 12 (Monday) asked the US Supreme Court to pause a ruling by a lower court which said that he does not have presidential immunity from criminal prosecution against his bid to overturn the 2020 US presidential election results. The lower court in this matter is the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit which previously rejected his immunity claim. Also read | Trump classified documents case: Former US president attends closed-door hearing in federal court in Florida A March 4 trial date for Trump in federal court in Washington on four criminal counts pursued by Special Counsel Jack Smith was postponed, with no new date yet set. Why Trump believes he shouldn't be prosecuted? Trump has claimed that he could not be tried for acts carried out as president. But a total of three lower court judges have previously ruled that Trump can be prosecuted like any other citizen. What does a potential criminal prosecution mean for Donald Trump? Donald Trump, by all counts and analysis, is the frontrunner for a presidential ticket from the Republican Party for US elections scheduled to be held in November 2024. "Conducting a months-long criminal trial of President Trump at the height of election season will radically disrupt President Trump's ability to campaign against President Biden," Trump's lawyers wrote in the filing. Also watch | US: Donald Trump's trial reaches its climax after clashes with the judge × "Without immunity from criminal prosecution, the Presidency as we know it will cease to exist," Trump's lawyers added. What next for Donald Trump? The US Supreme Court will now rule if or not Trump's bid to invoke presidential immunity for the acts purportedly committed during his presidential tenure is admissible in the context of events of Jan 6, 2020, or not. There could be two possible scenarios. One, if the US Supreme Court rules that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 elections since it happened when he was still the president. In this case, there will be a long delay in the election interference case possibly until the November elections. Two, if the US Supreme Court rules that Trump should be prosecuted in the election interference case. In that case, the federal trial in the case will be heard in the immediate future. (With inputs from agencies)

Donald Trump launches immunity bid in US Supreme Court against Jan 6 trial

NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is a bloc of 31 members. It's essentially a security alliance, if you attack one nato member you face the wrath of them all. Now, former US President Trump made remarks on NATO which have caused quite a stir. Trump in a recent speech said that he would "encourage" Russia to do whatever they wanted to NATO members who had not met their financial obligations. What are these financial obligations? What's the true cost of US' protection under the NATO alliance?

Will NATO be dismantled? | True cost of receiving US’ protection in NATO

A poll by NBC news has revealed how America's voters truly feel about the frontrunners of the Democrats and Republican camp.

Trump-Biden match: What Americans think about this?

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell reacted sharply on Monday (Feb 12) over Donald Trump's remark on&nbsp;the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members, saying that the bloc "cannot be an alliance a la carte".&nbsp;

Borrell's comments came after former United States president Trump said that he would encourage Russia to "do whatever the hell they want" if it attacked a NATO country that didn't pay enough to meet spending targets.&nbsp;

"Let's be serious. NATO cannot be an a la carte military alliance, it cannot be a military alliance that works depending on the humour of the president of the US" day-to-day, Borrell said.&nbsp;

"It exists or it not exists," he said, further adding that he was not going to keep commenting on "any silly idea" emerging from the US presidential election campaign.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-defense-secretary-lloyd-austin-hospitalised-again-pentagon-releases-statement-689313">US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin hospitalised again, hands over charge to deputy</a>&nbsp;

While speaking at a rally in South Carolina, Trump said that the US would not protect a NATO member that fails to meet its defence spending target.&nbsp;

The former president recalled an exchange with the leader of a "big country" when he was in office who asked whether they would be protected if Russia attacked.&nbsp;

"One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, 'Well, sir, if we don't pay, and we're attacked by Russia, will you protect us?' I said, 'You didn't pay, you're delinquent?'"&nbsp;

"No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You got to pay. You got to pay your bills," Trump added, talking in a hypothetical scenario.&nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;US Senate aid bill for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-senate-aid-bill-for-ukraine-israel-and-taiwan-689558/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://wionews.com/business-economy/eu-agrees-on-revised-fiscal-rules-to-spur-investments-and-debt-reduction-689533">EU agrees on revised fiscal rules to spur investments and debt reduction</a>&nbsp;

<h2>Trump's remarks spark row&nbsp;</h2>

NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg on Sunday warned against talk that "undermines security" after Trump's comments. "Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the US," Stoltenberg said.&nbsp;

The White House hit back at Trump's assertions, touting President Joe Biden's efforts to bolster alliances around the globe.&nbsp;

"Encouraging invasions of our closest allies by murderous regimes is appalling and unhinged," White House spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement Saturday night.

"Rather than calling for wars and promoting deranged chaos, President Biden will continue to bolster American leadership," Bates added.&nbsp;

Notably, the members of the NATO alliance abide by Article 5, which states that if a NATO nation is ever attacked, each and every other member of the alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against them.&nbsp;

In retaliation, they are bound to take the actions they deem necessary to assist the ally that is under attack.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell reacted sharply on Monday (Feb 12) over Donald Trump's remark on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members, saying that the bloc "cannot be an alliance a la carte".

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell reacted sharply on Monday (Feb 12) over Donald Trump's remark on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members, saying that the bloc "cannot be an alliance a la carte". Borrell's comments came after former United States president Trump said that he would encourage Russia to "do whatever the hell they want" if it attacked a NATO country that didn't pay enough to meet spending targets. "Let's be serious. NATO cannot be an a la carte military alliance, it cannot be a military alliance that works depending on the humour of the president of the US" day-to-day, Borrell said. "It exists or it not exists," he said, further adding that he was not going to keep commenting on "any silly idea" emerging from the US presidential election campaign. Also read: US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin hospitalised again, hands over charge to deputy While speaking at a rally in South Carolina, Trump said that the US would not protect a NATO member that fails to meet its defence spending target. The former president recalled an exchange with the leader of a "big country" when he was in office who asked whether they would be protected if Russia attacked. "One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, 'Well, sir, if we don't pay, and we're attacked by Russia, will you protect us?' I said, 'You didn't pay, you're delinquent?'" "No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You got to pay. You got to pay your bills," Trump added, talking in a hypothetical scenario. Watch: US Senate aid bill for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan × Also read: EU agrees on revised fiscal rules to spur investments and debt reduction Trump's remarks spark row NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg on Sunday warned against talk that "undermines security" after Trump's comments. "Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the US," Stoltenberg said. The White House hit back at Trump's assertions, touting President Joe Biden's efforts to bolster alliances around the globe. "Encouraging invasions of our closest allies by murderous regimes is appalling and unhinged," White House spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement Saturday night. "Rather than calling for wars and promoting deranged chaos, President Biden will continue to bolster American leadership," Bates added. Notably, the members of the NATO alliance abide by Article 5, which states that if a NATO nation is ever attacked, each and every other member of the alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against them. In retaliation, they are bound to take the actions they deem necessary to assist the ally that is under attack. (With inputs from agencies)

EU’s Josep Borrell says NATO ‘cannot be an alliance a la carte’

Donald Trump said that, while president, he told the leaders of NATO countries that he would "encourage" Russia "to do whatever the hell they want" to countries that had not paid the money they owed to the military alliance.

Donald Trump says he warned NATO ally: Spend more on defence

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump