The Supreme Court on Tuesday (November 3) asked the central government and others to respond after traders’ organisations filed a plea seeking to stop the ongoing demonstrations during the festive season. The court's remark was in the context of the ongoing protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Underscoring the right to protest, the apex court observed that protesters cannot occupy a designated protest site indefinitely. This comes after the tag of a designated protest site was moved from Jantar Mantar to three alternative sites, including Ramlila Maidan. On the development, the government's top lawyer Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court on Tuesday that whoever calls for a protest must take responsibility for any consequences during the course of the demonstrations. "You cannot occupy a site for all time to come. There are other protesters also. Where will farmers or lawyers go? Everyone has a right to protest," Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ruhullah-turns-up-heat-on-omar-abdullah-says-cm-should-pack-bags-for-england-as-political-rift-deepens-1793706936897"> Ruhullah turns up heat on Omar Abdullah, says CM should pack bags for England as political rift deepens</a><h3>Protest granted for one day</h3>Mehta told the Supreme Court that permission for the July 20 protest had been granted for just one day, yet the demonstration remained at the site and went on to march toward Parliament. He argued that Parliament isn’t simply another political building, emphasising that marches cannot be directed at either Parliament or the Supreme Court. The bench was examining a set of petitions, including one brought by traders, alongside concerns over alleged mass detentions, police misconduct, metro station closures, and internet suspensions linked to the protests. The bench, which also included Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, directed the trader organisations to add the organisers of the anti-CEC protest as respondents in their petition concerning business losses. Praveen Khandelwal, MP and Secretary General of the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), welcomed the Court’s intervention as significant. According to Khandelwal, the Court’s remarks highlight the need to maintain a constitutional balance between the fundamental right to peaceful protest and citizens’ equally important right to pursue their occupations and earn a livelihood.

The bench was examining a set of petitions, including one brought by traders, alongside concerns over alleged mass detentions, police misconduct, metro station closures, and internet suspensions linked to the protests.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (November 3) asked the central government and others to respond after traders’ organisations filed a plea seeking to stop the ongoing demonstrations during the festive season. The court's remark was in the context of the ongoing protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Underscoring the right to protest, the apex court observed that protesters cannot occupy a designated protest site indefinitely. This comes after the tag of a designated protest site was moved from Jantar Mantar to three alternative sites, including Ramlila Maidan. On the development, the government's top lawyer Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court on Tuesday that whoever calls for a protest must take responsibility for any consequences during the course of the demonstrations. "You cannot occupy a site for all time to come. There are other protesters also. Where will farmers or lawyers go? Everyone has a right to protest," Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said. Also read: Ruhullah turns up heat on Omar Abdullah, says CM should pack bags for England as political rift deepens Protest granted for one day Mehta told the Supreme Court that permission for the July 20 protest had been granted for just one day, yet the demonstration remained at the site and went on to march toward Parliament. He argued that Parliament isn’t simply another political building, emphasising that marches cannot be directed at either Parliament or the Supreme Court. The bench was examining a set of petitions, including one brought by traders, alongside concerns over alleged mass detentions, police misconduct, metro station closures, and internet suspensions linked to the protests. The bench, which also included Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, directed the trader organisations to add the organisers of the anti-CEC protest as respondents in their petition concerning business losses. Praveen Khandelwal, MP and Secretary General of the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), welcomed the Court’s intervention as significant. According to Khandelwal, the Court’s remarks highlight the need to maintain a constitutional balance between the fundamental right to peaceful protest and citizens’ equally important right to pursue their occupations and earn a livelihood.

The bench was examining a set of petitions, including one brought by traders, alongside concerns over alleged mass detentions, police misconduct, metro station closures, and internet suspensions linked to the protests.

'Protesters cannot occupy sites indefinitely': Supreme Court steps in as traders oppose anti-CEC stir

Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Sunday (November 1) said Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar would be removed from his post and jailed, accusing him of vote theft. Rahul Gandhi's remark came while addressing the INDIA bloc’s mega rally at Ramlila Maidan in the national capital. At the rally, Rahul Gandhi said action will be taken against the CEC, claiming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah would not have reached their political post without him. “Listen to me. What I say always turns out to be true, doesn’t it? I am telling every citizen and every youth of India: Gyanesh Kumar will be removed from the post of Chief Election Commissioner. Gyanesh Kumar will go to jail. Without Gyanesh Kumar, neither Narendra Modi would have become Prime Minister nor Amit Shah would have become Home Minister,” he said.<h3>Rahul Gandhi on farmers, youth and labourers' rights</h3>The LoP also highlighted concerns over escalating issues facing farmers, youth and labourers, and alleged that they were being denied their respective rights. He added that the wealth of the country has been concentrated in the hands of a few. He went on to argue that farmers are being denied their due, young people cannot find work, labourers are deprived of their rights, and the country’s wealth has concentrated in the hands of just two or three individuals. “We do not want such an India, and we will not accept such an India,” he said. The Congress leader also accused the Election Commission of facilitating vote theft across several state elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, alleging that results were manipulated both through EVMs and tampering with electoral rolls.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/new-indian-air-force-chief-acm-dixit-vows-to-restore-combat-strength-as-foremost-priority-1793516293417">New Indian Air Force Chief ACM Dixit vows to restore combat strength as foremost priority</a> “For years, vote theft has been happening in this country. Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and the 2024 Lok Sabha elections: in all these elections, vote theft has occurred. Votes have been stolen through EVMs and by deleting and adding names to voter lists,” he said. Rahul Gandhi went further, claiming that 15 per cent of India’s voters had been struck off the electoral rolls following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, calling the outcome an illegal, stolen election. “It was a stolen election. I am not the one saying this; the Election Commission is saying this,” he said.&nbsp;The rally, held in opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, drew senior INDIA bloc figures including Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge, Sonia Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, alongside Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav.

Rahul Gandhi raised concerns over escalating issues facing farmers, youth and labourers, and alleged that they were being denied their respective rights. He added that the wealth of the country has been concentrated in the hands of a few.

Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Sunday (November 1) said Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar would be removed from his post and jailed, accusing him of vote theft. Rahul Gandhi's remark came while addressing the INDIA bloc’s mega rally at Ramlila Maidan in the national capital. At the rally, Rahul Gandhi said action will be taken against the CEC, claiming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah would not have reached their political post without him. “Listen to me. What I say always turns out to be true, doesn’t it? I am telling every citizen and every youth of India: Gyanesh Kumar will be removed from the post of Chief Election Commissioner. Gyanesh Kumar will go to jail. Without Gyanesh Kumar, neither Narendra Modi would have become Prime Minister nor Amit Shah would have become Home Minister,” he said. Rahul Gandhi on farmers, youth and labourers' rights The LoP also highlighted concerns over escalating issues facing farmers, youth and labourers, and alleged that they were being denied their respective rights. He added that the wealth of the country has been concentrated in the hands of a few. He went on to argue that farmers are being denied their due, young people cannot find work, labourers are deprived of their rights, and the country’s wealth has concentrated in the hands of just two or three individuals. “We do not want such an India, and we will not accept such an India,” he said. The Congress leader also accused the Election Commission of facilitating vote theft across several state elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, alleging that results were manipulated both through EVMs and tampering with electoral rolls. Also read: New Indian Air Force Chief ACM Dixit vows to restore combat strength as foremost priority “For years, vote theft has been happening in this country. Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and the 2024 Lok Sabha elections: in all these elections, vote theft has occurred. Votes have been stolen through EVMs and by deleting and adding names to voter lists,” he said. Rahul Gandhi went further, claiming that 15 per cent of India’s voters had been struck off the electoral rolls following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, calling the outcome an illegal, stolen election. “It was a stolen election. I am not the one saying this; the Election Commission is saying this,” he said. The rally, held in opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, drew senior INDIA bloc figures including Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge, Sonia Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, alongside Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav.

Rahul Gandhi raised concerns over escalating issues facing farmers, youth and labourers, and alleged that they were being denied their respective rights. He added that the wealth of the country has been concentrated in the hands of a few.

'Gyanesh Kumar will go to jail': Rahul Gandhi targets CEC, says 'Modi, Shah wouldn't be in power without him'

India's Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Saturday (Oct 31) urged protesters attending the November 1 INDIA bloc mega rally to support Delhi traders on the festive occasion of Diwali. In a post on X, Gandhi stated that the INDIA bloc rally will not financially harm traders. The Congress leader accused the BJP of spreading rumours among the trader community in Delhi and appealed protesters to help the traders by shopping after the protest. He also extended his greetings for Diwali.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-says-cec-gyanesh-kumar-will-not-survive-calls-impeachment-programme-political-weapon-1793456817895">Rahul Gandhi says CEC Gyanesh Kumar 'will not survive as CEC'</a>&nbsp;In a video post on X, he said: "Namaskar, Tomorrow, lakhs of people are coming to Delhi for the Ramlila March. It is the festive season. The time of Diwali, Chhath, and Bhai Dooj has arrived. I want those lakhs of people coming to Delhi from outside to support the traders here. Protest, march, hold rallies, and along with that, do a little shopping too - it will benefit the traders. I know the rally will not harm the traders. The BJP is scared, that's why it's spreading rumors. But let's do both. Tomorrow there will be a march, there will be a rally, and lakhs of people will buy goods from the small shops of our traders. Much love to all of you. Happy Diwali. Jai Hind," said Gandhi.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/all-male-anti-constitutional-cult-rahul-gandhi-attacks-rss-on-its-foundation-day-1792510370292">‘All-male, anti-constitutional cult’: Rahul Gandhi attacks RSS on its foundation day</a>&nbsp;Gandhi was responding after the Chamber of Trade and Industry and the Federation of Sadar Bazar Traders Association requested Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi to defer the INDIA bloc's November 1 mega rally at Ramlila Maidan. The Chamber also wrote to other Opposition leaders including Akhilesh Yadav, Mamata Banerjee, Tejashwi Yadav, and Uddhav Thackeray.<h2>&nbsp;INDIA bloc’s mega rally&nbsp;</h2>The INDIA bloc’s mega rally is being held in Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan on Sunday (Nov 1), against alleged electoral irregularities and to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. On Saturday, the INDIA bloc carried out a symbolic “public impeachment” of CEC Kumar, unanimously adopting a motion by a show of hands. They levelled six charges against him, including conspiring with the ruling BJP to steal elections, deleting 13.2 crore voters through the special intensive revision (SIR) of voter lists, and acting at the behest of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has also extended support to the Nov 1 ‘Chalo Delhi’ Rally by Congress.

As people started arriving for INDIA bloc's November 1 mega rally at Delhi's Ramlila Maidan, Rahul Gandhi urged protesters travelling to the capital to shop at local stores during the festive season. He accused the BJP of spreading rumours 

India's Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Saturday (Oct 31) urged protesters attending the November 1 INDIA bloc mega rally to support Delhi traders on the festive occasion of Diwali. In a post on X, Gandhi stated that the INDIA bloc rally will not financially harm traders. The Congress leader accused the BJP of spreading rumours among the trader community in Delhi and appealed protesters to help the traders by shopping after the protest. He also extended his greetings for Diwali. Also Read: Rahul Gandhi says CEC Gyanesh Kumar 'will not survive as CEC' In a video post on X, he said: "Namaskar, Tomorrow, lakhs of people are coming to Delhi for the Ramlila March. It is the festive season. The time of Diwali, Chhath, and Bhai Dooj has arrived. I want those lakhs of people coming to Delhi from outside to support the traders here. Protest, march, hold rallies, and along with that, do a little shopping too - it will benefit the traders. I know the rally will not harm the traders. The BJP is scared, that's why it's spreading rumors. But let's do both. Tomorrow there will be a march, there will be a rally, and lakhs of people will buy goods from the small shops of our traders. Much love to all of you. Happy Diwali. Jai Hind," said Gandhi. Also Read: ‘All-male, anti-constitutional cult’: Rahul Gandhi attacks RSS on its foundation day Gandhi was responding after the Chamber of Trade and Industry and the Federation of Sadar Bazar Traders Association requested Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi to defer the INDIA bloc's November 1 mega rally at Ramlila Maidan. The Chamber also wrote to other Opposition leaders including Akhilesh Yadav, Mamata Banerjee, Tejashwi Yadav, and Uddhav Thackeray. INDIA bloc’s mega rally The INDIA bloc’s mega rally is being held in Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan on Sunday (Nov 1), against alleged electoral irregularities and to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. On Saturday, the INDIA bloc carried out a symbolic “public impeachment” of CEC Kumar, unanimously adopting a motion by a show of hands. They levelled six charges against him, including conspiring with the ruling BJP to steal elections, deleting 13.2 crore voters through the special intensive revision (SIR) of voter lists, and acting at the behest of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has also extended support to the Nov 1 ‘Chalo Delhi’ Rally by Congress.

As people started arriving for INDIA bloc's November 1 mega rally at Delhi's Ramlila Maidan, Rahul Gandhi urged protesters travelling to the capital to shop at local stores during the festive season. He accused the BJP of spreading rumours&nbsp;

INDIA bloc rally today: Rahul Gandhi urges protesters to support local traders, says 'march and go shopping'

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Saturday (Oct 31) accused Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar of working under the direct instructions of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, as the INDIA bloc held a symbolic 'public impeachment' against him in New Delhi.&nbsp;The proceedings began at Kharge's residence on Rajaji Marg, with former Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar chairing the event. Opposition leaders also issued a resolution listing six charges against the CEC and demanded his removal over alleged violations of the Constitution and manipulation of electoral rolls.&nbsp;Addressing the gathering, Kharge said, "CEC Gyanesh Kumar is running the Commission under the direct instructions of the Prime Minister and the Home Minister. Seven months ago, 193 opposition MPs moved a motion in both Houses of Parliament to remove the CEC.&nbsp;However, our notices were rejected, and no cognisance was taken of them. Therefore, the motion we have brought forward today is aimed at safeguarding the dignity of a constitutional institution."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">#WATCH | Delhi: At the INDIA bloc's symbolic public impeachment program against CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Congress national president Mallikarjun Kharge says, &quot;It is clear that the lifelong legal protection provided to the Chief Election Commissioner, Mr Gyanesh Kumar, by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Amit Shah through this government in December 2023 was intended as a cover for the criminal activities enacted by him against the nation and the Constitution of India. Therefore, he must be removed forthwith. Members of Parliament of the INDIA alliance, representing over sixty per cent of the population of India, along with the citizens assembled in New Delhi on October 31, 2026, resolved that for this gross betrayal of the people of India, the Chief Election Commissioner, Mr Gyanesh Kumar, must be tried for treason in a court of law in accordance with the legal framework of the Constitution of India...&quot;

 (Video Source: AICC)&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2116488038893457844?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 31, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>INDIA bloc lists six charges against CEC</h2><ol><li>Electoral manipulation: Allegedly colluding with the BJP to manipulate voter lists and influence election outcomes.</li><li>Irregularities in SIR: Accused of overseeing the alleged deletion of 13.2 crore voters through a partisan and opaque revision exercise.</li><li>Illegal amendment of Form 6: Allegedly changing Form 6 rules without parliamentary oversight to restrict first-time voter registration.</li><li>Centralisation of voter rolls: Accused of using ERONET/ECINET software to centralise control over electoral rolls and facilitate voter deletions.</li><li>Excluding Election Commissioners: Allegedly sidelining the other two Election Commissioners from decision-making, prompting at least 14 objections.</li><li>Failure to act independently: The opposition accused the CEC of targeting opposition parties, denying their leaders hearings and failing to uphold the Constitution.</li></ol>Kharge further said the opposition had no personal grudge against the CEC and wanted the Election Commission to function impartially.&nbsp;"We hold no personal grudge against the CEC. Our intention is for the Election Commission to function impartially, in line with the spirit of the Constitution, so that the common man's trust in it remains intact," he said.&nbsp;Kharge also targeted the BJP-led Centre, alleging that it had used various means to retain power since 2014.&nbsp;"Since 2014, every possible conspiracy has been hatched to seize and retain power. They have stolen MPs, broken up political parties, toppled governments, and used electoral bonds, the ED, and the CBI, and now they are stealing votes," he alleged.&nbsp;He further blamed the 2023 Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act for enabling alleged electoral manipulation.<h3>Rahul Gandhi urges people to join November 1 rally</h3>Meanwhile, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi called on people to join a march in Delhi on Sunday ahead of the INDIA bloc's rally at Ramlila Maidan on November 1.&nbsp;In a post on X, Gandhi announced that the march would begin at the Minto Road junction near Connaught Place at noon, pass through Ajmeri Gate and conclude at Ramlila Maidan."See you tomorrow, let's walk together," he said.&nbsp;However, Delhi Police sources said no permission had been sought for the proposed march from Connaught Place.

The INDIA bloc held a symbolic public impeachment of CEC Gyanesh Kumar in New Delhi, with Mallikarjun Kharge accusing him of working under the BJP leadership's instructions and the opposition listing six charges against him.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Saturday (Oct 31) accused Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar of working under the direct instructions of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, as the INDIA bloc held a symbolic 'public impeachment' against him in New Delhi. The proceedings began at Kharge's residence on Rajaji Marg, with former Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar chairing the event. Opposition leaders also issued a resolution listing six charges against the CEC and demanded his removal over alleged violations of the Constitution and manipulation of electoral rolls. Addressing the gathering, Kharge said, "CEC Gyanesh Kumar is running the Commission under the direct instructions of the Prime Minister and the Home Minister. Seven months ago, 193 opposition MPs moved a motion in both Houses of Parliament to remove the CEC. However, our notices were rejected, and no cognisance was taken of them. Therefore, the motion we have brought forward today is aimed at safeguarding the dignity of a constitutional institution."

The INDIA bloc held a symbolic public impeachment of CEC Gyanesh Kumar in New Delhi, with Mallikarjun Kharge accusing him of working under the BJP leadership's instructions and the opposition listing six charges against him.

INDIA bloc holds symbolic ‘public impeachment’ of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, lists 6 charges | Watch

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has told the Supreme Court in an affidavit that all three orders related to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls were taken unanimously by the three-member poll body and denied allegations of unilateral decision-making by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.The ECI said in an affidavit filed in response to petitions challenging the CEC’s functioning and changes to SIR-related forms that the allegations were based entirely on a single news report.&nbsp;It maintained that the CEC and both Election Commissioners had unanimously approved the affidavit.The poll body also clarified that suggestions, observations or queries raised by the CEC or Election Commissioners during internal discussions do not amount to decisions of the Commission.&nbsp;<h2>‘All three SIR orders were unanimous’</h2>&nbsp;The ECI said the three SIR orders issued in June 2025, October 2025 and May 2026 were unanimous decisions of the Commission.The poll body explained its decision-making process, saying files are generally examined first by one election commissioner, then the other, before being placed before the CEC. In urgent cases, approvals are obtained electronically and recorded on the file subsequently.It stressed that observations or queries raised by any of the three members while a file is being processed cannot be treated as a formal decision under Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023.The ECI also said that it had neither released nor authorised the release of any internal note or file to the media.&nbsp;<h2>‘Only Centre can amend prescribed form,’ ECI clarifies on Form 6</h2>&nbsp;On the controversy over changes to Form 6 used for voter registration, the ECI told the top court that the form itself had not been amended. It said only the Centre had the authority to amend the prescribed form, while the declaration required for the SIR process was a separate document.However, the Commission acknowledged that the online presentation of the application could be interpreted as an amendment. It said that the online application would be split into Form 6 and the separate declaration, in line with the physical application format.The ECI also said that voters whose details could not be mapped during the revision would not ordinarily be required to attend hearings. Booth-level officers (BLOs) would collect the necessary documents from their homes, with hearings reserved for exceptional cases and preferably conducted online.&nbsp;<h2>‘Voter’s name cannot be added or deleted without ERO’s order’</h2>&nbsp;Referring to questions over the ECINet system, the ECI said no voter’s name could be added to or deleted from the electoral roll without an order from the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO).It added that a panel of experts from the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) and the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) had been set up to examine compliance with the prescribed safeguards.&nbsp;On the controversy over 97 voters in Goa being reportedly left out of the electoral rolls, the ECI said 88 had already been enrolled, six were abroad and three held Portuguese passports.&nbsp;<h2>Explains July 28 work allocation order</h2>&nbsp;The affidavit also addressed a July 28 work allocation order issued by an Additional Secretary on deputation to the Commission. The ECI said both Election Commissioners wrote to the Cabinet Secretary the following day and that the order was never implemented after a joint direction was issued by the two commissioners on July 30.On appeals against the inclusion of voters in West Bengal, the Commission said these had been filed by officers of the state Chief Electoral Officer’s office in compliance with Supreme Court directions, and that the matters had not been brought before the panel.The ECI further maintained that any officer issuing orders beyond their delegated powers would face action.&nbsp;<h2>Opposes plea seeking to restrain CEC from discharging functions</h2>&nbsp;The ECI argued that the plea seeking to restrain the CEC from discharging his functions was not maintainable. It said the CEC could be removed only through the process applicable to a Supreme Court judge.It also referred to earlier Supreme Court decisions rejecting repeated challenges to electronic voting machines (EVMs).The ECI said it had filed a brief response because of the Dussehra vacation and sought permission to submit a detailed, point-by-point reply to the petitions.

The Election Commission explained its decision-making process, saying files are generally examined first by one election commissioner, then the other, before being placed before the CEC. The poll body said that all the allegations in the petitions were based entirely on a single news report.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has told the Supreme Court in an affidavit that all three orders related to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls were taken unanimously by the three-member poll body and denied allegations of unilateral decision-making by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The ECI said in an affidavit filed in response to petitions challenging the CEC’s functioning and changes to SIR-related forms that the allegations were based entirely on a single news report. It maintained that the CEC and both Election Commissioners had unanimously approved the affidavit. The poll body also clarified that suggestions, observations or queries raised by the CEC or Election Commissioners during internal discussions do not amount to decisions of the Commission. ‘All three SIR orders were unanimous’ The ECI said the three SIR orders issued in June 2025, October 2025 and May 2026 were unanimous decisions of the Commission. The poll body explained its decision-making process, saying files are generally examined first by one election commissioner, then the other, before being placed before the CEC. In urgent cases, approvals are obtained electronically and recorded on the file subsequently. It stressed that observations or queries raised by any of the three members while a file is being processed cannot be treated as a formal decision under Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023. The ECI also said that it had neither released nor authorised the release of any internal note or file to the media. ‘Only Centre can amend prescribed form,’ ECI clarifies on Form 6 On the controversy over changes to Form 6 used for voter registration, the ECI told the top court that the form itself had not been amended. It said only the Centre had the authority to amend the prescribed form, while the declaration required for the SIR process was a separate document. However, the Commission acknowledged that the online presentation of the application could be interpreted as an amendment. It said that the online application would be split into Form 6 and the separate declaration, in line with the physical application format. The ECI also said that voters whose details could not be mapped during the revision would not ordinarily be required to attend hearings. Booth-level officers (BLOs) would collect the necessary documents from their homes, with hearings reserved for exceptional cases and preferably conducted online. ‘Voter’s name cannot be added or deleted without ERO’s order’ Referring to questions over the ECINet system, the ECI said no voter’s name could be added to or deleted from the electoral roll without an order from the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO). It added that a panel of experts from the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) and the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) had been set up to examine compliance with the prescribed safeguards. On the controversy over 97 voters in Goa being reportedly left out of the electoral rolls, the ECI said 88 had already been enrolled, six were abroad and three held Portuguese passports. Explains July 28 work allocation order The affidavit also addressed a July 28 work allocation order issued by an Additional Secretary on deputation to the Commission. The ECI said both Election Commissioners wrote to the Cabinet Secretary the following day and that the order was never implemented after a joint direction was issued by the two commissioners on July 30. On appeals against the inclusion of voters in West Bengal, the Commission said these had been filed by officers of the state Chief Electoral Officer’s office in compliance with Supreme Court directions, and that the matters had not been brought before the panel. The ECI further maintained that any officer issuing orders beyond their delegated powers would face action. Opposes plea seeking to restrain CEC from discharging functions The ECI argued that the plea seeking to restrain the CEC from discharging his functions was not maintainable. It said the CEC could be removed only through the process applicable to a Supreme Court judge. It also referred to earlier Supreme Court decisions rejecting repeated challenges to electronic voting machines (EVMs). The ECI said it had filed a brief response because of the Dussehra vacation and sought permission to submit a detailed, point-by-point reply to the petitions.

The Election Commission explained its decision-making process, saying files are generally examined first by one election commissioner, then the other, before being placed before the CEC. The poll body said that all the allegations in the petitions were based entirely on a single news report.

‘All 3 SIR orders unanimous,’ EC tells SC, denies unilateral decision-making by CEC Gyanesh Kumar

Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan has tendered apology to the Supreme Court in response to a contempt notice. In his affidavit, he has submitted that there was no wilful or deliberate non-compliance with the court's October 9 order on restrictions imposed in Delhi. The affidavit submitted late Wednesday night says that the restrictions were only imposed with the aim of maintaining peace and preventing any disturbance of public order.&nbsp;The response cited a proposed protest allegedly being held without requisite permission and in the light of the Delhi Police's experience during the July 20 protest over the NEET paper leak.&nbsp;The Supreme Court had directed the Centre in its October 9 order to lift a complete prohibition on certain services and control them only to the extent that it did not cause inconvenience to the citizens of Delhi, reported ANI.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/troubling-pattern-of-threats-hindu-groups-security-advisory-police-arrest-man-for-plot-targeting-hindu-temple-in-illinois-alexandros-paporakis-1792037053581">'Troubling pattern of threats': Hindu groups issue advisory after man arrested for alleged plot to target Illinois temple</a>&nbsp;While responding on the suspension of internet services, Mohan submitted that there was a one-day suspension of cellular internet that “was found to be a proportionate measure, having regard to the magnitude of the situation and the need to prevent any disturbance of public order in the national capital.”&nbsp;In his four-page affidavit responding to the SC notice on contempt petition, Mohan also said that the restriction was within a four-kilometre radius of Raisina Hill and it applied only to cellular internet services and excluded Wi-Fi and broadband connections.&nbsp;Mohan has sought the discharge of the contempt notice issued against him. A request has also been made to modify the October 11 order of the Supreme Court permitting internet suspension in situations where it is necessary, subject to statutory safeguards.&nbsp;

While responding on the suspension of internet services in parts of Delhi, Mohan submitted that there was a one-day suspension of cellular internet that was found to be a proportionate measure, having regard to the magnitude of the situation.

Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan has tendered apology to the Supreme Court in response to a contempt notice. In his affidavit, he has submitted that there was no wilful or deliberate non-compliance with the court's October 9 order on restrictions imposed in Delhi. The affidavit submitted late Wednesday night says that the restrictions were only imposed with the aim of maintaining peace and preventing any disturbance of public order. The response cited a proposed protest allegedly being held without requisite permission and in the light of the Delhi Police's experience during the July 20 protest over the NEET paper leak. The Supreme Court had directed the Centre in its October 9 order to lift a complete prohibition on certain services and control them only to the extent that it did not cause inconvenience to the citizens of Delhi, reported ANI. ALSO READ: 'Troubling pattern of threats': Hindu groups issue advisory after man arrested for alleged plot to target Illinois temple While responding on the suspension of internet services, Mohan submitted that there was a one-day suspension of cellular internet that “was found to be a proportionate measure, having regard to the magnitude of the situation and the need to prevent any disturbance of public order in the national capital.” In his four-page affidavit responding to the SC notice on contempt petition, Mohan also said that the restriction was within a four-kilometre radius of Raisina Hill and it applied only to cellular internet services and excluded Wi-Fi and broadband connections. Mohan has sought the discharge of the contempt notice issued against him. A request has also been made to modify the October 11 order of the Supreme Court permitting internet suspension in situations where it is necessary, subject to statutory safeguards.

While responding on the suspension of internet services in parts of Delhi, Mohan submitted that there was a one-day suspension of cellular internet that “was found to be a proportionate measure, having regard to the magnitude of the situation."

'No wilful violation': Centre apologises to SC over non-compliance of its order on Delhi restrictions

Indian-origin US Representative Pramila Jayapal on Wednesday (Oct 14) criticised the Indian government's electoral list revision, aka the SIR exercise, alleging that it could "purge 130 million people from the voting rolls". She also expressed support for non-violent protests against what she described as "anti-democratic efforts"."I am deeply concerned about the actions of the Indian government to purge 130 million people from the voting rolls," Jayapal said in a statement on X. She compared the situation with what she described as efforts by the Trump administration to undermine voting rights in the United States."Protecting democracies everywhere is essential work, and the Indian people, like the American people, deserve free and fair elections," said the Washington representative, adding that she stood with Indians participating in non-violent protests.<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn3.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20261015/image-1792041505119.png"></figure>Her remarks come amid demonstrations against the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demands for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/cjp-slams-coward-sarkar-as-saurav-das-ashutosh-ranka-sent-to-5-days-judicial-custody-over-jantar-mantar-protest-1791949661026">CJP slams 'Coward Sarkar' as Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka sent to 5 days' judicial custody over Jantar Mantar protest</a><h2>Rahul Gandhi alleges police assault on student protesters</h2>In Delhi, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi accused police of assaulting student protesters detained during demonstrations against the electoral roll revision exercise. He urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah not to suppress the demonstrators' voices.Addressing protesters, Gandhi described the gathering as a collective expression that cut across religion, caste and gender. "As I said in my press conference, this is India. Amit Shah ji, take a good look at this. There is no Hindu here, no Muslim, no one of any specific caste; there is no woman, no man. There is one voice, one protest. It is the voice of India, and you are standing against this voice—the Prime Minister is standing against this voice. I suggest to you: do not stand against this voice. No one can stand against this voice," Gandhi said.He also urged students to record any alleged police misconduct and share the evidence with the Congress. Gandhi said the party would use the material to seek accountability from those found responsible. His remarks followed allegations from student activists that they had been assaulted in police vehicles and at police stations."To the police personnel, I have told all the students to keep a video record and send that evidence to us. When this entire matter concludes, we will utilise all that evidence and ensure that everyone who needs to be punished is punished, from PM Narendra Modi, Gyanesh Kumar, Amit Shah, and even the constable who is raising a hand against our children," he said.During a press conference, Gandhi also highlighted the case of Athira, a Delhi University student from Kerala, alleging that she had lost hearing in one ear after being struck during detention. The allegations have not been independently established in the material provided.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/near-the-seat-of-power-far-from-free-protest-jantar-mantar-to-tiananmen-5-iconic-protest-sites-where-protests-are-no-longer-allowed-1791879318970">Near the seat of power, far from free protest? Jantar Mantar to Tiananmen: 5 iconic protest sites where protests are no longer allowed</a><h2>Actor Imran Khan issued notice to leave India by October 28 after Mumbai protest</h2>Actor Imran Khan, nephew of Bollywood star Aamir Khan, has reportedly been issued a notice by Mumbai Police directing him to leave India by October 28, following his participation in a protest in Mumbai over the Election Commission of India's electoral roll revision exercise.Notably, Khan attended a demonstration at August Kranti Maidan where protesters demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. He was also taken into custody by Mumbai Police. The notice was reportedly issued under provisions of the Immigration Act, with authorities citing his participation in the protest despite his not being an Indian citizen.&nbsp;

US Representative Pramila Jayapal has criticised India's voter roll revision exercise, citing a claim involving 130 million people, as Rahul Gandhi alleges police excesses against student protesters. Here's what she said,

Indian-origin US Representative Pramila Jayapal on Wednesday (Oct 14) criticised the Indian government's electoral list revision, aka the SIR exercise, alleging that it could "purge 130 million people from the voting rolls". She also expressed support for non-violent protests against what she described as "anti-democratic efforts". "I am deeply concerned about the actions of the Indian government to purge 130 million people from the voting rolls," Jayapal said in a statement on X. She compared the situation with what she described as efforts by the Trump administration to undermine voting rights in the United States. "Protecting democracies everywhere is essential work, and the Indian people, like the American people, deserve free and fair elections," said the Washington representative, adding that she stood with Indians participating in non-violent protests. Her remarks come amid demonstrations against the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demands for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. Also read | CJP slams 'Coward Sarkar' as Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka sent to 5 days' judicial custody over Jantar Mantar protest Rahul Gandhi alleges police assault on student protesters In Delhi, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi accused police of assaulting student protesters detained during demonstrations against the electoral roll revision exercise. He urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah not to suppress the demonstrators' voices. Addressing protesters, Gandhi described the gathering as a collective expression that cut across religion, caste and gender. "As I said in my press conference, this is India. Amit Shah ji, take a good look at this. There is no Hindu here, no Muslim, no one of any specific caste; there is no woman, no man. There is one voice, one protest. It is the voice of India, and you are standing against this voice—the Prime Minister is standing against this voice. I suggest to you: do not stand against this voice. No one can stand against this voice," Gandhi said. He also urged students to record any alleged police misconduct and share the evidence with the Congress. Gandhi said the party would use the material to seek accountability from those found responsible. His remarks followed allegations from student activists that they had been assaulted in police vehicles and at police stations. "To the police personnel, I have told all the students to keep a video record and send that evidence to us. When this entire matter concludes, we will utilise all that evidence and ensure that everyone who needs to be punished is punished, from PM Narendra Modi, Gyanesh Kumar, Amit Shah, and even the constable who is raising a hand against our children," he said. During a press conference, Gandhi also highlighted the case of Athira, a Delhi University student from Kerala, alleging that she had lost hearing in one ear after being struck during detention. The allegations have not been independently established in the material provided. Also read | Near the seat of power, far from free protest? Jantar Mantar to Tiananmen: 5 iconic protest sites where protests are no longer allowed Actor Imran Khan issued notice to leave India by October 28 after Mumbai protest Actor Imran Khan, nephew of Bollywood star Aamir Khan, has reportedly been issued a notice by Mumbai Police directing him to leave India by October 28, following his participation in a protest in Mumbai over the Election Commission of India's electoral roll revision exercise. Notably, Khan attended a demonstration at August Kranti Maidan where protesters demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. He was also taken into custody by Mumbai Police. The notice was reportedly issued under provisions of the Immigration Act, with authorities citing his participation in the protest despite his not being an Indian citizen.

US Representative Pramila Jayapal has criticised India's voter roll revision exercise, citing a claim involving 130 million people, as Rahul Gandhi alleges police excesses against student protesters. Here's what she said.

US: India-origin Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal criticises India over SIR, alleges 130 million being 'purged' from electoral rolls

Ahead of the planned protest by INDIA bloc members on Monday (Oct 12), Delhi metro and Delhi traffic police has imposed major curbs. This comes even as the Supreme Court on Oct 11 warned against blanket blockades on metro and roads. The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation(DMRC) took to X in the wee hours of Monday and announced that the entry and exit at Patel Chowk, Janpath, Rajiv Chowk, Mandi House, Central Secretariat and Barakhamba Road will be closed from 6:00 AM to 4:00 PM. DMRC said that the step was taken “due to security reasons.”&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn3.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20261012/image-1791773092769.png"></figure><h2>Road blockades announced by Delhi Traffic Police</h2>On the intervening night of Sunday and Monday, Delhi Traffic Police issued a notice informing the public about the major road blockades. It said that the step was taken “in view of the prevailing law and order situation on 12.10.2026.” The notice added: “Motorists are requested to avoid non-essential travel through affected areas, follow diversion signs and directions of traffic personnel, and cooperate with Delhi Traffic Police to ensure smooth traffic movement.” The traffic police have also advised commuters travelling to railway stations, inter-state bus terminals (ISBTs) and the airport via New Delhi and Central Delhi to allow additional travel time.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-wakes-up-to-heavy-rain-thunderstorms-yellow-alert-in-place-temperature-drops-1791771957617">Delhi wakes up to heavy rain, thunderstorms; yellow alert in place; temperature drops</a>&nbsp;It said that dynamic traffic diversions and restrictions may be implemented depending on ground conditions at major junctions and stretches, including Panchkuian, Mandi House, Dr Dinesh Nandini Dalmia Chowk (W-Point), Ram Charan Aggarwal Chowk (A-Point), Minto Road, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, Guru Nanak Chowk, Chelmsford Road, Connaught Place, Bharion Road, Lodhi Road Flyover, Neela Gumbad, Sardar Patel Marg-Panchsheel Marg crossing, Bhikaji Cama Place, Moti Bagh Flyover, Ring Road-San Martin Marg T-Point, Ashoka Road, Rail Bhawan, Jantar Mantar Road, Jai Singh Road-Sansad Marg crossing, Barakhamba Road, Patel Chowk and RML Hospital.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">TRAFFIC ADVISORY

In view of the prevailing law and order situation on 12.10.2026, traffic restrictions and diversions may be implemented at various locations across Delhi. Commuters are advised to plan their journeys in advance and allow additional travel time.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

* Motorists are requested to avoid non-essential travel through affected areas, follow diversion signs and directions of traffic personnel, and cooperate with Delhi Traffic Police to ensure smooth traffic movement.

* For real-time updates and assistance, connect with Delhi Traffic Police through the following channels:

FACEBOOK: https://t.co/XMFa7Ld8gD

PLATFORM X: https://t.co/hro9F9Bmge

INSTAGRAM: https://t.co/aL9StmHNJn

WHATSAPP: 8750871493

HELPLINE NOS.: 1095 / 011-25844444

#DTPUpdates
@PMOIndia

@HMOIndia

@LtGovDelhi

@CPDelhi

@CMODelhi

@DelhiPolice

@OfficialDMRC

@dtchq_delhi

@tweetndmc

@FBDPolice

@gurgaonpolice

@SonipatPolice

@jhajjarpolice

@ghaziabadpolice

@CP_Noida

@timesofindia

@the_hindu

@IndianExpress

@AmarUjalaNews

@NavbharatTimes

@Live_Hindustan

@TimesNow

@IndiaToday

@republic&mdash; Delhi Traffic Police (@dtptraffic) <a href="https://x.com/dtptraffic/status/2109345260589748614?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>INDIA Bloc protest</h2>The INDIA bloc comprising of Congress and other major opposition parties will march to the Supreme Court on Monday, demanding chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's resignation over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The protest adds to the protests already happening in the national capital over SIR and women safety by AISA and CJP. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has called on young people, opposition parties and civil society groups to join the march. The Congress has named it "Chalo Delhi - March for Democracy" and said participants will assemble at 1.30pm at the Connaught Place-Barakhamba Road junction.

Delhi Metro has closed entry and exit at six stations from 6 am to 4 pm on October 12 ahead of the planned INDIA bloc protest. Delhi Traffic Police has also announced possible diversions across key stretches, urging commuters to avoid non-essential travel and allow extra time.

Ahead of the planned protest by INDIA bloc members on Monday (Oct 12), Delhi metro and Delhi traffic police has imposed major curbs. This comes even as the Supreme Court on Oct 11 warned against blanket blockades on metro and roads. The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation(DMRC) took to X in the wee hours of Monday and announced that the entry and exit at Patel Chowk, Janpath, Rajiv Chowk, Mandi House, Central Secretariat and Barakhamba Road will be closed from 6:00 AM to 4:00 PM. DMRC said that the step was taken “due to security reasons.” Road blockades announced by Delhi Traffic Police On the intervening night of Sunday and Monday, Delhi Traffic Police issued a notice informing the public about the major road blockades. It said that the step was taken “in view of the prevailing law and order situation on 12.10.2026.” The notice added: “Motorists are requested to avoid non-essential travel through affected areas, follow diversion signs and directions of traffic personnel, and cooperate with Delhi Traffic Police to ensure smooth traffic movement.” The traffic police have also advised commuters travelling to railway stations, inter-state bus terminals (ISBTs) and the airport via New Delhi and Central Delhi to allow additional travel time. Also Read: Delhi wakes up to heavy rain, thunderstorms; yellow alert in place; temperature drops It said that dynamic traffic diversions and restrictions may be implemented depending on ground conditions at major junctions and stretches, including Panchkuian, Mandi House, Dr Dinesh Nandini Dalmia Chowk (W-Point), Ram Charan Aggarwal Chowk (A-Point), Minto Road, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, Guru Nanak Chowk, Chelmsford Road, Connaught Place, Bharion Road, Lodhi Road Flyover, Neela Gumbad, Sardar Patel Marg-Panchsheel Marg crossing, Bhikaji Cama Place, Moti Bagh Flyover, Ring Road-San Martin Marg T-Point, Ashoka Road, Rail Bhawan, Jantar Mantar Road, Jai Singh Road-Sansad Marg crossing, Barakhamba Road, Patel Chowk and RML Hospital.

Delhi Metro has closed entry and exit at six stations from 6 am to 4 pm on October 12 ahead of the planned INDIA bloc protest. Delhi Traffic Police has also announced possible diversions across key stretches, urging commuters to avoid non-essential travel and allow extra time.

Delhi Metro shuts 6 stations, major traffic curbs imposed ahead of INDIA bloc protest: Check routes here

A group of 124 former IAS, IFS and allied services officers has backed the Election Commission of India (ECI) amid allegations of electoral irregularities, arguing that claims of vote rigging must be supported by verifiable evidence. This comes amid the ongoing debate over electoral integrity, with the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) and opposition parties holding protests in the national capital.In an open letter addressed to citizens, the former bureaucrats also defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, describing it as an exercise to remove inaccuracies and maintain reliable voter lists.“We belong to no party. We write because one word, ‘rigged’, is now thrown at our elections without evidence, and every repetition wounds democratic trust that belongs to all of us,” the letter read.<h2>Officers point to changes in election management</h2>The letter recalled an earlier era marked by booth capturing, ballot box stuffing and election-related violence, contrasting it with safeguards now in place, including polling agents, EVM sealing, strong-room security and VVPAT verification.Citing the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections, the officers said the polls recorded the highest voter turnout since 1951 and required no re-polling. They presented this as evidence of improvements in election management.The letter also referred to election results that went against the party ruling at the Centre, including the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, arguing that the same electoral system cannot be considered credible only when a party wins.“A system cannot be honest when you win and rigged when you lose,” the letter stated.<h2>Officers defend SIR</h2>The former officers argued that electoral rolls must be updated to identify deceased voters, duplicate registrations and people who have permanently moved elsewhere.According to their letter, Bihar's revision exercise identified around 22 lakh deceased electors and seven lakh duplicate entries, while approximately 21.5 lakh new voters were added.They said the process included draft roll publication, claims and objections, hearings and appeal provisions to address concerns over wrongful exclusion.Evidence urged over allegationsThe officers said electoral disputes should be pursued through established legal channels, including objections to voter lists and election petitions before High Courts.“Questioning is every citizen’s right. Proving is the accuser’s duty,” they said, warning that unsupported allegations could erode public confidence in democratic institutions.The letter also urged citizens to verify their registration and help family members, neighbours and migrant workers check their names on electoral rolls.

A group of 124 former civil servants defended the ECI and SIR, citing Bihar poll data, voter-list safeguards and legal remedies, and urged evidence-based allegations to protect public trust in democracy.

A group of 124 former IAS, IFS and allied services officers has backed the Election Commission of India (ECI) amid allegations of electoral irregularities, arguing that claims of vote rigging must be supported by verifiable evidence. This comes amid the ongoing debate over electoral integrity, with the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) and opposition parties holding protests in the national capital. In an open letter addressed to citizens, the former bureaucrats also defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, describing it as an exercise to remove inaccuracies and maintain reliable voter lists. “We belong to no party. We write because one word, ‘rigged’, is now thrown at our elections without evidence, and every repetition wounds democratic trust that belongs to all of us,” the letter read. Officers point to changes in election management The letter recalled an earlier era marked by booth capturing, ballot box stuffing and election-related violence, contrasting it with safeguards now in place, including polling agents, EVM sealing, strong-room security and VVPAT verification. Citing the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections, the officers said the polls recorded the highest voter turnout since 1951 and required no re-polling. They presented this as evidence of improvements in election management. The letter also referred to election results that went against the party ruling at the Centre, including the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, arguing that the same electoral system cannot be considered credible only when a party wins. “A system cannot be honest when you win and rigged when you lose,” the letter stated. Officers defend SIR The former officers argued that electoral rolls must be updated to identify deceased voters, duplicate registrations and people who have permanently moved elsewhere. According to their letter, Bihar's revision exercise identified around 22 lakh deceased electors and seven lakh duplicate entries, while approximately 21.5 lakh new voters were added. They said the process included draft roll publication, claims and objections, hearings and appeal provisions to address concerns over wrongful exclusion. Evidence urged over allegations The officers said electoral disputes should be pursued through established legal channels, including objections to voter lists and election petitions before High Courts. “Questioning is every citizen’s right. Proving is the accuser’s duty,” they said, warning that unsupported allegations could erode public confidence in democratic institutions. The letter also urged citizens to verify their registration and help family members, neighbours and migrant workers check their names on electoral rolls.

A group of 124 former civil servants defended the ECI and SIR, citing Bihar poll data, voter-list safeguards and legal remedies, and urged evidence-based allegations to protect public trust in democracy.

‘Rigged when you lose’: 124 former civil servants back ECI, SIR in open letter to citizens

The INDIA bloc on Friday (October 9) submitted a four-point memorandum to President Droupadi Murmu, alleging large-scale electoral manipulation by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and seeking sweeping changes to the election system. Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi later claimed that Murmu “did not deny” the allegations during the meeting. Instead of questioning or arguing with the Opposition leaders, she asked them to submit proof of their claims, he said. The meeting comes amid protests over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demands for action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.<h2>What are the INDIA bloc’s four demands?</h2>The memorandum accuses Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah of undermining India’s electoral system. It alleges that electronic voting machines (EVMs) and voter lists were manipulated in several elections.The bloc’s four demands are:<ul><li>Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation: Remove the Chief Election Commissioner and repeal the 2023 law granting immunity to election commissioners for acts performed in their official capacity.</li><li>Restore deleted voter names: Suspend the SIR process and reinstate 13.30 crore voters allegedly removed from electoral rolls.</li><li>Return to paper ballots: Replace EVM-based voting with paper ballots for all elections.</li><li>Repeal disputed elections: Annul Assembly elections held over the past two years where the bloc claims conclusive evidence of “vote chori” exists.</li></ul><h2>Why has the bloc approached Murmu?</h2>The leaders argued that Article 326 of the Constitution, which provides for adult suffrage, underpins representative democracy. They accused the Election Commission of failing to safeguard that right and alleged irregularities in elections in Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Delhi and West Bengal.The memorandum said the President’s office was a final recourse when other avenues had failed. The allegations against the BJP and the Election Commission remain claims made by the Opposition. &nbsp;

The INDIA bloc urged President Murmu to act on four demands over alleged ‘vote chori’. Rahul Gandhi said she did not deny the claims but asked Opposition leaders to submit proof.

The INDIA bloc on Friday (October 9) submitted a four-point memorandum to President Droupadi Murmu, alleging large-scale electoral manipulation by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and seeking sweeping changes to the election system. Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi later claimed that Murmu “did not deny” the allegations during the meeting. Instead of questioning or arguing with the Opposition leaders, she asked them to submit proof of their claims, he said. The meeting comes amid protests over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demands for action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. What are the INDIA bloc’s four demands? The memorandum accuses Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah of undermining India’s electoral system. It alleges that electronic voting machines (EVMs) and voter lists were manipulated in several elections. The bloc’s four demands are: Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation: Remove the Chief Election Commissioner and repeal the 2023 law granting immunity to election commissioners for acts performed in their official capacity. Restore deleted voter names: Suspend the SIR process and reinstate 13.30 crore voters allegedly removed from electoral rolls. Return to paper ballots: Replace EVM-based voting with paper ballots for all elections. Repeal disputed elections: Annul Assembly elections held over the past two years where the bloc claims conclusive evidence of “vote chori” exists. Why has the bloc approached Murmu? The leaders argued that Article 326 of the Constitution, which provides for adult suffrage, underpins representative democracy. They accused the Election Commission of failing to safeguard that right and alleged irregularities in elections in Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Delhi and West Bengal. The memorandum said the President’s office was a final recourse when other avenues had failed. The allegations against the BJP and the Election Commission remain claims made by the Opposition.

The INDIA bloc urged President Murmu to act on four demands over alleged ‘vote chori’. Rahul Gandhi said she did not deny the claims but asked Opposition leaders to submit proof.

From CEC’s resignation to paper ballots: INDIA bloc’s 4 demands to President Murmu

Indian Railways has cancelled Mail and Express trains scheduled to arrive at New Delhi and Hazrat Nizamuddin railway stations between 4 am and 2 pm on Saturday (Oct 10), citing anticipated severe traffic congestion around the stations. According to a railway order issued on Friday (Oct 09), trains departing from their originating stations after 2 pm on Friday and scheduled to reach either of the two stations during the specified window will be cancelled at source.This comes amid protests against the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. On October 10, the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), which started as a social media movement, announced a protest in the national capital.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ai-used-to-fabricate-evidence-of-molestation-at-anti-cec-protest-delhi-police-arrest-man-over-fake-acp-vivek-bhagat-poster-1791342744693">AI used to fabricate ‘evidence’ of molestation at anti-CEC protest? Delhi Police arrest man over fake ACP Vivek Bhagat CCTV video</a><h2>Why have trains been cancelled on Oct 10?</h2>The order, issued by the Railway Board's Coaching Directorate, cited the possibility of severe road traffic congestion in the areas surrounding the stations as the reason for the decision."Intelligence inputs and traffic advisory indicate severe road congestion around New Delhi and the Hazrat Nizamuddin Railway Station area on 10th Oct, 2026 between 04:00 hrs to 14:00 hrs due to planned protest/demonstration by Opposition parties in Central Delhi," it reads."This is the same pattern we saw recently at New Delhi station, where due to rush and road blockades linked to such protests, a train departed, leaving nearly 5,000 genuine passengers left behind on platforms unable to reach on time. Citizens suffered because of this protest."Framing the measure as a "proactive, precautionary step," it adds that "all Mail/Express trains starting from source after 14:00 hrs on 9th Oct which were scheduled to arrive New Delhi / Hazrat Nizamuddin between 04:00-14:00 hrs on 10th Oct are cancelled at source."The cancellations come amid protests against CEC Gyanesh Kumar. However, railway officials have not confirmed whether the decision is directly linked to the demonstrations.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/wait-till-you-rahul-gandhi-takes-a-swipe-as-musk-s-ambani-real-boss-of-india-remark-triggers-x-subscription-cancellations-starlink-row-1791512600230">‘Wait till you discover the other guy’: Rahul Gandhi takes a swipe as Musk's 'real boss of India' remark triggers X subscription cancellations</a><h2>CJP Oct 10 protest "illegal": Delhi Police</h2>Delhi Police has warned against the CJP's proposed October 10 protest, saying that any such gathering would be considered illegal.Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Shrishti Pandey said protests were not permitted at Jantar Mantar or any other location while Section 163 restrictions remained in force, warning that the police would take legal action against unauthorised gatherings. “Section 163 is in effect, meaning protests are not permitted—neither at Jantar Mantar nor anywhere else. Any gathering will be considered illegal, and we would be compelled to take necessary legal action against it,” Pandey said. The DCP urged people not to participate in the proposed protest, asking them to prioritise their safety and that of their families. “I would like to urge the protestors not to participate in such illegal gatherings. Please prioritise your own safety as well. Also, consider the safety of your family,” she said.

Indian Railways has cancelled Mail and Express trains scheduled to arrive at New Delhi and Hazrat Nizamuddin stations between 4 am and 2 pm on October 10, citing anticipated traffic congestion. The cancellations come amid protests against CEC Gyanesh Kumar in the national capital.

Indian Railways has cancelled Mail and Express trains scheduled to arrive at New Delhi and Hazrat Nizamuddin railway stations between 4 am and 2 pm on Saturday (Oct 10), citing anticipated severe traffic congestion around the stations. According to a railway order issued on Friday (Oct 09), trains departing from their originating stations after 2 pm on Friday and scheduled to reach either of the two stations during the specified window will be cancelled at source. This comes amid protests against the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. On October 10, the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), which started as a social media movement, announced a protest in the national capital. Also read | AI used to fabricate ‘evidence’ of molestation at anti-CEC protest? Delhi Police arrest man over fake ACP Vivek Bhagat CCTV video Why have trains been cancelled on Oct 10? The order, issued by the Railway Board's Coaching Directorate, cited the possibility of severe road traffic congestion in the areas surrounding the stations as the reason for the decision. "Intelligence inputs and traffic advisory indicate severe road congestion around New Delhi and the Hazrat Nizamuddin Railway Station area on 10th Oct, 2026 between 04:00 hrs to 14:00 hrs due to planned protest/demonstration by Opposition parties in Central Delhi," it reads. "This is the same pattern we saw recently at New Delhi station, where due to rush and road blockades linked to such protests, a train departed, leaving nearly 5,000 genuine passengers left behind on platforms unable to reach on time. Citizens suffered because of this protest." Framing the measure as a "proactive, precautionary step," it adds that "all Mail/Express trains starting from source after 14:00 hrs on 9th Oct which were scheduled to arrive New Delhi / Hazrat Nizamuddin between 04:00-14:00 hrs on 10th Oct are cancelled at source." The cancellations come amid protests against CEC Gyanesh Kumar. However, railway officials have not confirmed whether the decision is directly linked to the demonstrations. Also read | ‘Wait till you discover the other guy’: Rahul Gandhi takes a swipe as Musk's 'real boss of India' remark triggers X subscription cancellations CJP Oct 10 protest "illegal": Delhi Police Delhi Police has warned against the CJP's proposed October 10 protest, saying that any such gathering would be considered illegal. Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Shrishti Pandey said protests were not permitted at Jantar Mantar or any other location while Section 163 restrictions remained in force, warning that the police would take legal action against unauthorised gatherings. “Section 163 is in effect, meaning protests are not permitted—neither at Jantar Mantar nor anywhere else. Any gathering will be considered illegal, and we would be compelled to take necessary legal action against it,” Pandey said. The DCP urged people not to participate in the proposed protest, asking them to prioritise their safety and that of their families. “I would like to urge the protestors not to participate in such illegal gatherings. Please prioritise your own safety as well. Also, consider the safety of your family,” she said.

Indian Railways has cancelled Mail and Express trains scheduled to arrive at New Delhi and Hazrat Nizamuddin stations between 4 am and 2 pm on October 10, citing anticipated traffic congestion. The cancellations come amid protests against CEC Gyanesh Kumar in the national capital.

Delhi train cancellations: Mail, Express trains arriving at New Delhi, Hazrat Nizamuddin cancelled till 2 pm on October 10

Following the protests led by the Congress in the national capital, the party's agitation has now spread to Jammu and Kashmir, with Congress leaders and workers taking to the streets across several districts of the Union Territory. The protests are part of the party's nationwide campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with Congress accusing him of compromising the electoral process and demanding his removal.The Congress had planned a major protest in the Kashmir Valley, with party workers and leaders intending to march towards Lal Chowk and stage a sit-in to press their demands. However, heavy deployments of Jammu and Kashmir Police and CRPF personnel were positioned outside the party office, preventing the protesters from leaving the premises.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ai-used-to-fabricate-evidence-of-molestation-at-anti-cec-protest-delhi-police-arrest-man-over-fake-acp-vivek-bhagat-poster-1791342744693">AI used to fabricate ‘evidence’ of molestation at anti-CEC protest? Delhi Police arrest man over fake ACP Vivek Bhagat CCTV video</a>Multi-layered barricades were erected at the gates of the Congress headquarters, while security personnel maintained a tight cordon around the building. The measures effectively confined party workers and leaders inside the premises and prevented the planned street demonstration from taking place.The protest was part of the Congress's nationwide campaign demanding the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The party has accused Kumar of facilitating what it calls "vote theft" and has alleged that decisions taken by the Election Commission compromised the fairness of the electoral process and benefited the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).Congress leaders have particularly criticised the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, alleging that the exercise could affect the integrity of the electoral process. The party has maintained that its allegations amount to a serious threat to democratic institutions and has vowed to continue its campaign until Kumar is removed from office.At the Srinagar headquarters, Congress workers raised slogans against the Election Commission, the BJP-led central government and Gyanesh Kumar. Leaders also expressed strong resentment over what they described as the alleged mistreatment of Rahul Gandhi during the protest in the national capital.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-police-register-3-firs-over-jantar-mantar-protests-demanding-cec-gyanesh-kumar-s-resignation-1791013486008">Delhi Police register 3 FIRs over Jantar Mantar protests demanding CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation</a>Congress leaders alleged that the heavy security deployment in Srinagar was an attempt to suppress legitimate political dissent. They accused the administration of restricting their constitutional right to protest and claimed that the security arrangements were intended to prevent the party from taking its campaign to the streets.The security presence extended beyond the Congress headquarters, with police and paramilitary personnel deployed in and around the M.A. Road and Lal Chowk areas. Mobile units were also stationed nearby to prevent the protest from spilling onto the main roads.Congress leaders said the agitation would continue across Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of the country until their demand for the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner is addressed. Meanwhile, Congress MLA and supporters also protested in North Kashmir's Baramulla district.&nbsp;

Congress's nationwide campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has reached Jammu and Kashmir, where security forces blocked a planned Srinagar march towards Lal Chowk. Congress workers also protested in Baramulla as the party stepped up its agitation.

Following the protests led by the Congress in the national capital, the party's agitation has now spread to Jammu and Kashmir, with Congress leaders and workers taking to the streets across several districts of the Union Territory. The protests are part of the party's nationwide campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with Congress accusing him of compromising the electoral process and demanding his removal. The Congress had planned a major protest in the Kashmir Valley, with party workers and leaders intending to march towards Lal Chowk and stage a sit-in to press their demands. However, heavy deployments of Jammu and Kashmir Police and CRPF personnel were positioned outside the party office, preventing the protesters from leaving the premises. Also read | AI used to fabricate ‘evidence’ of molestation at anti-CEC protest? Delhi Police arrest man over fake ACP Vivek Bhagat CCTV video Multi-layered barricades were erected at the gates of the Congress headquarters, while security personnel maintained a tight cordon around the building. The measures effectively confined party workers and leaders inside the premises and prevented the planned street demonstration from taking place. The protest was part of the Congress's nationwide campaign demanding the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The party has accused Kumar of facilitating what it calls "vote theft" and has alleged that decisions taken by the Election Commission compromised the fairness of the electoral process and benefited the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Congress leaders have particularly criticised the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, alleging that the exercise could affect the integrity of the electoral process. The party has maintained that its allegations amount to a serious threat to democratic institutions and has vowed to continue its campaign until Kumar is removed from office. At the Srinagar headquarters, Congress workers raised slogans against the Election Commission, the BJP-led central government and Gyanesh Kumar. Leaders also expressed strong resentment over what they described as the alleged mistreatment of Rahul Gandhi during the protest in the national capital. Also read | Delhi Police register 3 FIRs over Jantar Mantar protests demanding CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation Congress leaders alleged that the heavy security deployment in Srinagar was an attempt to suppress legitimate political dissent. They accused the administration of restricting their constitutional right to protest and claimed that the security arrangements were intended to prevent the party from taking its campaign to the streets. The security presence extended beyond the Congress headquarters, with police and paramilitary personnel deployed in and around the M.A. Road and Lal Chowk areas. Mobile units were also stationed nearby to prevent the protest from spilling onto the main roads. Congress leaders said the agitation would continue across Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of the country until their demand for the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner is addressed. Meanwhile, Congress MLA and supporters also protested in North Kashmir's Baramulla district.

Congress's nationwide campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has reached Jammu and Kashmir, where security forces blocked a planned Srinagar march towards Lal Chowk. Congress workers also protested in Baramulla as the party stepped up its agitation.

Congress intensifies nationwide protest; demonstrations held across J&K

The Election Commission of India (ECI) said on Tuesday that no political party had sought an appointment with the poll panel before 4 pm, as the INDIA bloc staged protest over alleged irregularities in electoral rolls.Opposition MPs led by the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, marched from Parliament towards the Election Commission headquarters, demanding a meeting with the poll panel and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar.&nbsp;&nbsp;The march was stopped by police before the leaders could reach the ECI office, following which several Opposition MPs staged a sit-in.&nbsp;After the high-voltage protest, Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and others were detained by the Delhi Police from Akashvani Bhawan, where they staged a dharna against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.&nbsp;The ECI issued a press note later in the day, saying the Delhi Police informed it at around 4 pm that a delegation of MPs led by Rahul Gandhi wanted to meet and submit a memorandum.&nbsp;The Delhi Police’s deputy commissioner informed the EC that the proposed meeting involved around 240 MPs and was to take place at the Parliament House Annexe.&nbsp;&nbsp;The poll panel said its established procedure required political parties or joint delegations of parties to seek an appointment through their authorised representatives.&nbsp;<h2>EC considered ‘unusual’ request and declined it, citing protocol</h2>&nbsp;“The Election Commission of India had laid down a procedure in 2025 for meetings with political parties. All political parties have been informed about this procedure and follow it. Whenever a delegation of a political party, or a joint delegation of several parties, wishes to meet the Commission, it seeks an appointment through its duly authorised representative. The meeting is then held at a time mutually agreed upon by both sides,” the statement read.&nbsp;The ECI said it considered the request “unusual” and declined it, citing its protocol that such meetings are held at the Commission’s premises.&nbsp;“When the Election Commission was considering the proposal for the meeting with the MPs after 4 pm today, the DCP of Delhi Police informed it that the meeting being sought was with a group of 240 MPs and that the proposed venue was Parliament House Annexe. The Election Commission considered this request unusual and could not accept it because, as per protocol, such meetings are held only at the premises of the Election Commission of India,” the statement read.&nbsp;The Commission offered to send its most senior serving officer to the Parliament Annexe to receive the memorandum from the MPs, but the MPs declined it.“Any political party can request a meeting with the Election Commission at any time, and the Commission can, depending on the availability of time, decide the date and time of the meeting. This is a normal process,” the statement read.&nbsp;

The ECI found the request to be unusual and declined it, citing its protocol that such meetings are held at its premises. The Commission offered to send its most senior serving officer to the Parliament Annexe to receive the memorandum from the MPs, but the MPs declined it.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) said on Tuesday that no political party had sought an appointment with the poll panel before 4 pm, as the INDIA bloc staged protest over alleged irregularities in electoral rolls. Opposition MPs led by the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, marched from Parliament towards the Election Commission headquarters, demanding a meeting with the poll panel and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. The march was stopped by police before the leaders could reach the ECI office, following which several Opposition MPs staged a sit-in. After the high-voltage protest, Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and others were detained by the Delhi Police from Akashvani Bhawan, where they staged a dharna against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The ECI issued a press note later in the day, saying the Delhi Police informed it at around 4 pm that a delegation of MPs led by Rahul Gandhi wanted to meet and submit a memorandum. The Delhi Police’s deputy commissioner informed the EC that the proposed meeting involved around 240 MPs and was to take place at the Parliament House Annexe. The poll panel said its established procedure required political parties or joint delegations of parties to seek an appointment through their authorised representatives. EC considered ‘unusual’ request and declined it, citing protocol “The Election Commission of India had laid down a procedure in 2025 for meetings with political parties. All political parties have been informed about this procedure and follow it. Whenever a delegation of a political party, or a joint delegation of several parties, wishes to meet the Commission, it seeks an appointment through its duly authorised representative. The meeting is then held at a time mutually agreed upon by both sides,” the statement read. The ECI said it considered the request “unusual” and declined it, citing its protocol that such meetings are held at the Commission’s premises. “When the Election Commission was considering the proposal for the meeting with the MPs after 4 pm today, the DCP of Delhi Police informed it that the meeting being sought was with a group of 240 MPs and that the proposed venue was Parliament House Annexe. The Election Commission considered this request unusual and could not accept it because, as per protocol, such meetings are held only at the premises of the Election Commission of India,” the statement read. The Commission offered to send its most senior serving officer to the Parliament Annexe to receive the memorandum from the MPs, but the MPs declined it. “Any political party can request a meeting with the Election Commission at any time, and the Commission can, depending on the availability of time, decide the date and time of the meeting. This is a normal process,” the statement read.

The ECI found the request to be unusual and declined it, citing its protocol that such meetings are held at its premises. The Commission offered to send its most senior serving officer to the Parliament Annexe to receive the memorandum from the MPs, but the MPs declined it.

‘No party sought meeting till 4 pm,’ says EC on INDIA bloc protest against CEC Gyanesh Kumar

Delhi Police have registered at least three FIRs in connection with Friday's (Oct 02) protests by student groups, political parties and civil society activists who attempted to gather at Jantar Mantar and demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Two FIRs were registered at Parliament Street police station and one at Connaught Place police station, police said, as reported by PTI.<h2>What are the charges against Jantar Mantar protestors?</h2>The cases invoke Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which deals with disobedience of an order duly promulgated by a public servant. According to the report, no individual or organisation has been named in the accused column of the FIRs. However, police said the names and details of organisers and organisations that proposed or participated in the demonstrations have been mentioned in the contents of the cases.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sir-row-opposition-takes-to-streets-against-cec-in-delhi-cjp-protest-in-mumbai-1790969007100">SIR row: Opposition takes streets against CEC in Delhi; CJP protests in Mumbai</a><h2>Why were the FIRs registered?</h2>According to police officers, the cases were based on daily diary entries made by police officials following Friday's demonstrations. The protests were held despite prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) being in force across the New Delhi district. Police had said the restrictions were imposed to maintain public order, ensure public safety and regulate traffic. The orders prohibited public gatherings of five or more people, processions, demonstrations, picketing and dharnas without prior written permission. Carrying certain weapons and objects, as well as shouting slogans or making speeches, was also prohibited without permission. Delhi Police had warned before the demonstrations that violations could invite action under Section 223 of the BNS and other applicable laws.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-secures-deportation-of-narco-trafficking-kingpin-navpreet-singh-from-t-rkiye-big-breaking-amit-shah-1791003130238">India secures narco-trafficking kingpin Navpreet Singh's deportation from Turkey</a><h2>Why was a protest held at Jantar Mantar on Gandhi Jayanti?</h2>The protest was called by the Aam Aadmi Party, AISA, Students' Federation of India, National Students' Union of India, Indian Youth Congress and other student and youth groups. The protesters were demanding Kumar's resignation over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. The allegations have been disputed, and the Election Commission has denied wrongdoing.&nbsp;

Delhi Police have registered three FIRs over Friday's protests against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar at Jantar Mantar. The cases invoke Section 223 of the BNS after protesters allegedly violated prohibitory orders imposed across the New Delhi district.


Delhi Police have registered at least three FIRs in connection with Friday's (Oct 02) protests by student groups, political parties and civil society activists who attempted to gather at Jantar Mantar and demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Two FIRs were registered at Parliament Street police station and one at Connaught Place police station, police said, as reported by PTI. What are the charges against Jantar Mantar protestors? The cases invoke Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which deals with disobedience of an order duly promulgated by a public servant. According to the report, no individual or organisation has been named in the accused column of the FIRs. However, police said the names and details of organisers and organisations that proposed or participated in the demonstrations have been mentioned in the contents of the cases. Also read | SIR row: Opposition takes streets against CEC in Delhi; CJP protests in Mumbai Why were the FIRs registered? According to police officers, the cases were based on daily diary entries made by police officials following Friday's demonstrations. The protests were held despite prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) being in force across the New Delhi district. Police had said the restrictions were imposed to maintain public order, ensure public safety and regulate traffic. The orders prohibited public gatherings of five or more people, processions, demonstrations, picketing and dharnas without prior written permission. Carrying certain weapons and objects, as well as shouting slogans or making speeches, was also prohibited without permission. Delhi Police had warned before the demonstrations that violations could invite action under Section 223 of the BNS and other applicable laws. Also read | India secures narco-trafficking kingpin Navpreet Singh's deportation from Turkey Why was a protest held at Jantar Mantar on Gandhi Jayanti? The protest was called by the Aam Aadmi Party, AISA, Students' Federation of India, National Students' Union of India, Indian Youth Congress and other student and youth groups. The protesters were demanding Kumar's resignation over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. The allegations have been disputed, and the Election Commission has denied wrongdoing.

Delhi Police have registered three FIRs over Friday's protests against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar at Jantar Mantar. The cases invoke Section 223 of the BNS after protesters allegedly violated prohibitory orders imposed across the New Delhi district.

Delhi Police register 3 FIRs over Jantar Mantar protests demanding CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation

The Election Commission on Wednesday night (Sep 29) removed the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) declaration added to Form 6, from its ECINET application portal in states where the revision has concluded. According to Indian Express report, the official confirmation comes four days after the ECI announced that “for non-SIR period, the Forms applicable as per Rules (the Registration of Electors Rules 1960) will be used.” The full Commission had decided on Sep 26 that the requirement would apply only during the exercise. Form 6 is the statutory form used by eligible citizens to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/election-commission-nine-decisions-sir-ecinet-form-6-internal-rift-1790507131449">Election Commission on 'damage control' : What do nine new decisions mean?</a><h2>What this means?</h2>The declaration -- which has been removed now -- requires new applicants to show details linking themselves or their parents or grandparents to electoral rolls prepared during an earlier SIR. While it has been removed for states where SIR has been completed, it remains available on the ECINET portal in states and Union Territories where the SIR is underway. Therefore, in states where SIR has concluded, the new voters seeking enrolment will only have to fill the statutory Form 6 prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 and will not have to furnish details linking themselves to earlier SIR.&nbsp;<h2>The ECI controversy&nbsp;</h2>The ECI found itself in a major political row after an Indian Express report claimed that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had objected to several points in the SIR at least 14 times in 10 months. Exposing the rift between the Commissioners and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, the report alleged that major decisions regarding voter registration, the deletion/restoration of names, and the handling of the electoral roll database were being issued unilaterally by the CEC without their knowledge or consent. Joshi had objected to changes to the form on the grounds that a form prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, could not be modified without amending the rules. Sandhu had concurred with him. They explained that Form 6 cannot be altered or appended without a legal amendment enacted through the Union Law Ministry.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/election-commission-sir-rti-response-an-jali-bhardwaj-june-24-order-1790516431918">SIR row: RTI response raises questions over EC’s claim of unanimous approval</a><h2>What was decided on Sep 26?</h2>The declaration asking new applicants to link themselves, their parents, or their grandparents to previous SIR rolls was the "additional declaration" that triggered internal dissent within the commission. On Sep 26, after the row created major controversy, the commissioners held a meeting. The ECI legally and procedurally decided that this declaration must only apply during active SIR periods and be entirely removed for non-SIR periods. It also decided that for any voter who receives an SIR notice for being "unmapped" or having "logical discrepancies," Booth Level Officers (BLOs) must physically visit their home to collect the required documents. The BLOs are then responsible for uploading them to the ECINet portal. Following the announcement, the technical removal took effect on Sep 29 late night.

The Election Commission has removed the SIR-linked declaration from Form 6 on its ECINET portal in states where the Special Intensive Revision has concluded. The move follows the EC’s September 26 clarification that standard forms would apply outside SIR periods.

The Election Commission on Wednesday night (Sep 29) removed the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) declaration added to Form 6, from its ECINET application portal in states where the revision has concluded. According to Indian Express report, the official confirmation comes four days after the ECI announced that “for non-SIR period, the Forms applicable as per Rules (the Registration of Electors Rules 1960) will be used.” The full Commission had decided on Sep 26 that the requirement would apply only during the exercise. Form 6 is the statutory form used by eligible citizens to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll. Also Read: Election Commission on 'damage control' : What do nine new decisions mean? What this means? The declaration -- which has been removed now -- requires new applicants to show details linking themselves or their parents or grandparents to electoral rolls prepared during an earlier SIR. While it has been removed for states where SIR has been completed, it remains available on the ECINET portal in states and Union Territories where the SIR is underway. Therefore, in states where SIR has concluded, the new voters seeking enrolment will only have to fill the statutory Form 6 prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 and will not have to furnish details linking themselves to earlier SIR. The ECI controversy The ECI found itself in a major political row after an Indian Express report claimed that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had objected to several points in the SIR at least 14 times in 10 months. Exposing the rift between the Commissioners and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, the report alleged that major decisions regarding voter registration, the deletion/restoration of names, and the handling of the electoral roll database were being issued unilaterally by the CEC without their knowledge or consent. Joshi had objected to changes to the form on the grounds that a form prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, could not be modified without amending the rules. Sandhu had concurred with him. They explained that Form 6 cannot be altered or appended without a legal amendment enacted through the Union Law Ministry. Also Read: SIR row: RTI response raises questions over EC’s claim of unanimous approval What was decided on Sep 26? The declaration asking new applicants to link themselves, their parents, or their grandparents to previous SIR rolls was the "additional declaration" that triggered internal dissent within the commission. On Sep 26, after the row created major controversy, the commissioners held a meeting. The ECI legally and procedurally decided that this declaration must only apply during active SIR periods and be entirely removed for non-SIR periods. It also decided that for any voter who receives an SIR notice for being "unmapped" or having "logical discrepancies," Booth Level Officers (BLOs) must physically visit their home to collect the required documents. The BLOs are then responsible for uploading them to the ECINet portal. Following the announcement, the technical removal took effect on Sep 29 late night.

The Election Commission has removed the SIR-linked declaration from Form 6 on its ECINET portal in states where the Special Intensive Revision has concluded. The move follows the EC’s September 26 clarification that standard forms would apply outside SIR periods.

EC rolls back SIR add-on in Form 6 that was objected by two commissioners: What this means

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday (Sept 29) called Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar a "puppet" of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing the Modi government of weakening India’s democratic foundations.&nbsp;Speaking at the Congress Working Committee (CWC) meeting in New Delhi, Kharge alleged that voter names were being removed from electoral rolls through calculated conspiracies.&nbsp;"The Modi government has systematically and conspiratorially hollowed out the strong democratic foundation that our forefathers built through their sacrifices and dedication over the last 12 years," he said.&nbsp;"Names are being removed from voter lists through calculated conspiracies, and the Chief Election Commissioner has become a puppet of the Modi government," Kharge added.&nbsp;The Congress chief also demanded PM Modi’s resignation on moral grounds, accusing him of pressuring the CEC. He said Gyanesh Kumar had no right to continue in office and should be removed immediately.&nbsp;"Under these circumstances, he (Gyanesh Kumar) has no right to remain in office and should be removed immediately. Furthermore, the Prime Minister, under whose pressure he acted in this manner, should himself resign on moral grounds," he said.<h3>Kharge lists five demands over voter lists</h3>Kharge outlined five demands from the Congress over changes to voter lists and the election process.The party has sought the publication of complete data on major changes in electoral rolls. It also wants voters whose names have been removed to receive full information and an opportunity to appeal.&nbsp;The Congress has demanded that political parties receive voter lists and other essential data in a simple format and on time.&nbsp;Kharge also called for independent and time-bound investigations wherever serious discrepancies are found. His fifth demand was greater transparency in crucial data and decisions related to elections so that political parties cannot claim that information is being withheld.&nbsp;Kharge said the issue was important ahead of elections in five states in 2027. He said the Congress must protect voters’ rights and keep public trust in the election process intact.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sir-in-maharashtra-poll-chief-seeks-more-discretion-for-local-election-officers-1790680106312">SIR in Maharashtra: Poll chief seeks more discretion for local election officers</a><h3>Opposition leaders back Rahul Gandhi’s allegations</h3>Several opposition leaders have supported Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of widespread voter deletions in Delhi’s Bela Estate.&nbsp;Samajwadi Party MP Awadhesh Prasad said the government and Election Commission were seeking to deprive voters of their rights and stressed the importance of an independent poll body.&nbsp;"The government and the Election Commission want to deprive voters of their rights on a large scale," he said.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray and UBT Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray announced a joint protest march against the Election Commission on October 4.&nbsp;Raj Thackeray said the march would begin from Byculla and proceed to the BMC headquarters.&nbsp;"For several years, we have consistently raised questions regarding EVMs and the arbitrary actions of the Election Commission, yet no solution has been found so far," he said.&nbsp;"I would like to invite all parties to join this protest march," Raj Thackeray added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-warns-no-infrastructure-will-remain-safe-if-its-security-is-not-guaranteed-as-it-awaits-us-response-on-hormuz-plan-1790679122753">Iran warns ‘no infrastructure will remain safe’ if its security is not guaranteed as it awaits US response on Hormuz plan</a><h3>Two Congress leaders arrested for defacing CEC’s Agra home</h3>Earlier on Tuesday, Agra Police arrested two Congress leaders for allegedly defacing the wall and main gate of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s home in Agra.&nbsp;The words "Gyanesh Gaddar, Gyanesh Chor" (Gyanesh traitor, Gyanesh thief) were allegedly written on the property.&nbsp;Police arrested Anil Yadav, Provincial General Secretary (Organisation) Azamgarh, and Mukesh Dhanger, District President Congress Mathura, after they allegedly fled the spot. The two were arrested along with their vehicle.&nbsp;The Congress has been protesting against the Chief Election Commissioner amid the controversy over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Congress and other opposition parties will meet on Wednesday to discuss a joint strategy to take the protest forward.

Congress chief outlined five demands seeking greater transparency in voter roll changes, information and appeal rights for deleted voters, timely access to electoral data for parties, independent probes into discrepancies and transparency in key election decisions.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday (Sept 29) called Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar a "puppet" of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing the Modi government of weakening India’s democratic foundations. Speaking at the Congress Working Committee (CWC) meeting in New Delhi, Kharge alleged that voter names were being removed from electoral rolls through calculated conspiracies. "The Modi government has systematically and conspiratorially hollowed out the strong democratic foundation that our forefathers built through their sacrifices and dedication over the last 12 years," he said. "Names are being removed from voter lists through calculated conspiracies, and the Chief Election Commissioner has become a puppet of the Modi government," Kharge added. The Congress chief also demanded PM Modi’s resignation on moral grounds, accusing him of pressuring the CEC. He said Gyanesh Kumar had no right to continue in office and should be removed immediately. "Under these circumstances, he (Gyanesh Kumar) has no right to remain in office and should be removed immediately. Furthermore, the Prime Minister, under whose pressure he acted in this manner, should himself resign on moral grounds," he said. Kharge lists five demands over voter lists Kharge outlined five demands from the Congress over changes to voter lists and the election process. The party has sought the publication of complete data on major changes in electoral rolls. It also wants voters whose names have been removed to receive full information and an opportunity to appeal. The Congress has demanded that political parties receive voter lists and other essential data in a simple format and on time. Kharge also called for independent and time-bound investigations wherever serious discrepancies are found. His fifth demand was greater transparency in crucial data and decisions related to elections so that political parties cannot claim that information is being withheld. Kharge said the issue was important ahead of elections in five states in 2027. He said the Congress must protect voters’ rights and keep public trust in the election process intact. Also Read: SIR in Maharashtra: Poll chief seeks more discretion for local election officers Opposition leaders back Rahul Gandhi’s allegations Several opposition leaders have supported Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of widespread voter deletions in Delhi’s Bela Estate. Samajwadi Party MP Awadhesh Prasad said the government and Election Commission were seeking to deprive voters of their rights and stressed the importance of an independent poll body. "The government and the Election Commission want to deprive voters of their rights on a large scale," he said. Meanwhile, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray and UBT Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray announced a joint protest march against the Election Commission on October 4. Raj Thackeray said the march would begin from Byculla and proceed to the BMC headquarters. "For several years, we have consistently raised questions regarding EVMs and the arbitrary actions of the Election Commission, yet no solution has been found so far," he said. "I would like to invite all parties to join this protest march," Raj Thackeray added. Also Read: Iran warns ‘no infrastructure will remain safe’ if its security is not guaranteed as it awaits US response on Hormuz plan Two Congress leaders arrested for defacing CEC’s Agra home Earlier on Tuesday, Agra Police arrested two Congress leaders for allegedly defacing the wall and main gate of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s home in Agra. The words "Gyanesh Gaddar, Gyanesh Chor" (Gyanesh traitor, Gyanesh thief) were allegedly written on the property. Police arrested Anil Yadav, Provincial General Secretary (Organisation) Azamgarh, and Mukesh Dhanger, District President Congress Mathura, after they allegedly fled the spot. The two were arrested along with their vehicle. The Congress has been protesting against the Chief Election Commissioner amid the controversy over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Congress and other opposition parties will meet on Wednesday to discuss a joint strategy to take the protest forward.

Congress chief outlined five demands seeking greater transparency in voter roll changes, information and appeal rights for deleted voters, timely access to electoral data for parties, independent probes into discrepancies and transparency in key election decisions.

‘CEC has become a puppet’: Kharge demands Gyanesh Kumar’s removal, lists 5 demands

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court demanding the suspension of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, along with a declaration that decisions on matters pending before the Supreme Court cannot be taken unilaterally by the head of the constitutional body. The petition has been filed by Rakesh Kumar Singh under Article 32 of the Constitution. The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. A writ of quo warranto was sought by the petitioner, calling upon the CEC “to show under what authority he has acted, and continues to act, as though entitled individually to exercise the collective decision-making power vested by Article 324 in the Election Commission as a body.”<h3>CEC position cannot be treated as institution</h3>The petition argued that Article 324(1) places the superintendence, direction and control of elections with “a Commission," not with an individual Chief Election Commissioner. Although Article 324(3) names the CEC as Chairman, this constitutional position cannot be treated as the institution itself. It also relied on Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. Under this provision, the Commission can regulate its own procedure by unanimous decision; its business should be conducted unanimously as far as possible, and any differences are settled by majority. One of the examples it cited is the alleged change to Form-6 under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, in July 2026. The revised form reportedly requires applicants to state whether they, their parents or their grandparents "exist" in the electoral roll used in the last Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The petition pointed to notes by Commissioners Joshi (May 16, 2026) and Sandhu (May 19 and August 13, 2026), who objected that the change was unauthorised and illegal because the Rules had not been amended."

The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court demanding the suspension of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, along with a declaration that decisions on matters pending before the Supreme Court cannot be taken unilaterally by the head of the constitutional body. The petition has been filed by Rakesh Kumar Singh under Article 32 of the Constitution. The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. A writ of quo warranto was sought by the petitioner, calling upon the CEC “to show under what authority he has acted, and continues to act, as though entitled individually to exercise the collective decision-making power vested by Article 324 in the Election Commission as a body.” CEC position cannot be treated as institution The petition argued that Article 324(1) places the superintendence, direction and control of elections with “a Commission," not with an individual Chief Election Commissioner. Although Article 324(3) names the CEC as Chairman, this constitutional position cannot be treated as the institution itself. It also relied on Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. Under this provision, the Commission can regulate its own procedure by unanimous decision; its business should be conducted unanimously as far as possible, and any differences are settled by majority. One of the examples it cited is the alleged change to Form-6 under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, in July 2026. The revised form reportedly requires applicants to state whether they, their parents or their grandparents "exist" in the electoral roll used in the last Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The petition pointed to notes by Commissioners Joshi (May 16, 2026) and Sandhu (May 19 and August 13, 2026), who objected that the change was unauthorised and illegal because the Rules had not been amended."

The plea in the court comes amid several media reports indicating that nearly 14 decisions were taken between October 2025 and August 2026 in the name of the EC despite recorded objections by the other two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.

Petition in SC seeks suspension of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, says Election Commission decisions must be collective