Britain's tortuous divorce from the European Union veered into fresh crisis on Monday after London threatened to undermine the exit agreement unless free trade terms are agreed by next month.

In yet another twist to the four-year saga since Britain voted narrowly to quit the bloc, Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government was reportedly planning new legislation to override parts of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement it signed in January.

That could potentially jeopardise the whole treaty and create frictions in British-ruled Northern Ireland where special arrangements had been made to avoid a hard border with Ireland to the south that could be detrimental to a peace agreement.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://13.235.153.162/world/european-union-chief-warns-uk-must-respect-brexit-withdrawal-deal-325745" hreflang="en">European Union chief warns UK must respect Brexit withdrawal deal</a>

Sections of the proposed internal market bill are expected to "eliminate the legal force of parts of the withdrawal agreement" in areas including state aid and Northern Ireland customs, the Financial Times newspaper said, citing three people familiar with the plans.

EU diplomats were aghast, cautioning that such a step - leaked on the eve of new talks in London - would tarnish Britain's global prestige and heighten chances of a tumultuous final disentangling from the bloc on Dec. 31.

The report was neither confirmed nor denied by Britain.

A government spokeswoman said it would work to resolve outstanding disagreements about Northern Ireland with the EU but was considering fall back options. "We will always reserve the right to act in the best interests of Northern Ireland and the UK's internal market," she said.

"Our top priority is to preserve the huge gains from the peace process and the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement, as well as protecting Northern Ireland's place in our United Kingdom."

Sterling fell against the dollar and euro.

Britain left the EU on Jan. 31 but talks on a new trade deal before the end of a status-quo transition arrangement in December have snagged on state aid rules and fishing.

London has set a deadline of Oct. 15 to strike a deal.

"If we can't agree by then, then I do not see that there will be a free trade agreement between us, and we should both accept that and move on," Johnson was to say on Monday, according to his office.

WHO WILL BLINK FIRST?

European diplomats said Britain was playing a game of Brexit chicken by threatening to collapse the process and challenging Brussels to blink first. Some fear Johnson may view a no-deal exit as useful distraction from the coronavirus crisis.

Without a deal, about $900 billion annual trade between Britain and the EU could be thrown into uncertainty, including rules on everything from car parts and medicines to fruit and data.

Some Brexit-supporting members of the ruling Conservatives oppose the withdrawal agreement as threatening British independence even if the two sides secure future trade ties.

There was surprise and anger on both sides of the Irish border and in Brussels at the reported plan to undermine the withdrawal pact.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://13.235.153.162/world/british-pm-boris-johnson-sets-october-15-as-deadline-for-brexit-negotiations-with-eu-325611" hreflang="en">British PM Boris Johnson sets October 15 as deadline for Brexit negotiations with EU</a>

"I trust the British government to implement the Withdrawal Agreement, an obligation under international law &amp; prerequisite for any future partnership," said Ursula von der Leyen, head of the European Commission.

"Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland is essential to protect peace and stability on the island &amp; integrity of the single market," she added on Twitter.

Leaders of Northern Ireland's Sinn Fein and SDLP parties, the region's two largest Irish nationalist groups, also criticised the government's reported plan.

British Environment Secretary George Eustice said the government was committed to implementing the Withdrawal Agreement but some legal ambiguities needed to be tidied up over the Northern Irish protocol.

"We are not moving the goal posts," he told Sky News.

EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier acknowledged anxiety but declined to comment on the FT report. "I remain worried ... the negotiations are difficult, because the British want the best of both worlds," he told France Inter radio.

If no deal is agreed, Britain would have a trading relationship with the bloc like Australia's, which would be "a good outcome", Johnson was also to say on Monday.

Australia is negotiating a free trade deal with the EU to improve its market access, but for now largely trades with the bloc on World Trade Organization terms.

Britain's tortuous divorce from the European Union veered into fresh crisis on Monday after London threatened to undermine the exit agreement unless free trade terms are agreed by next month.

Britain's tortuous divorce from the European Union veered into fresh crisis on Monday after London threatened to undermine the exit agreement unless free trade terms are agreed by next month. In yet another twist to the four-year saga since Britain voted narrowly to quit the bloc, Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government was reportedly planning new legislation to override parts of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement it signed in January. That could potentially jeopardise the whole treaty and create frictions in British-ruled Northern Ireland where special arrangements had been made to avoid a hard border with Ireland to the south that could be detrimental to a peace agreement. Also read: European Union chief warns UK must respect Brexit withdrawal deal Sections of the proposed internal market bill are expected to "eliminate the legal force of parts of the withdrawal agreement" in areas including state aid and Northern Ireland customs, the Financial Times newspaper said, citing three people familiar with the plans. EU diplomats were aghast, cautioning that such a step - leaked on the eve of new talks in London - would tarnish Britain's global prestige and heighten chances of a tumultuous final disentangling from the bloc on Dec. 31. The report was neither confirmed nor denied by Britain. A government spokeswoman said it would work to resolve outstanding disagreements about Northern Ireland with the EU but was considering fall back options. "We will always reserve the right to act in the best interests of Northern Ireland and the UK's internal market," she said. "Our top priority is to preserve the huge gains from the peace process and the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement, as well as protecting Northern Ireland's place in our United Kingdom." Sterling fell against the dollar and euro. Britain left the EU on Jan. 31 but talks on a new trade deal before the end of a status-quo transition arrangement in December have snagged on state aid rules and fishing. London has set a deadline of Oct. 15 to strike a deal. "If we can't agree by then, then I do not see that there will be a free trade agreement between us, and we should both accept that and move on," Johnson was to say on Monday, according to his office. WHO WILL BLINK FIRST? European diplomats said Britain was playing a game of Brexit chicken by threatening to collapse the process and challenging Brussels to blink first. Some fear Johnson may view a no-deal exit as useful distraction from the coronavirus crisis. Without a deal, about $900 billion annual trade between Britain and the EU could be thrown into uncertainty, including rules on everything from car parts and medicines to fruit and data. Some Brexit-supporting members of the ruling Conservatives oppose the withdrawal agreement as threatening British independence even if the two sides secure future trade ties. There was surprise and anger on both sides of the Irish border and in Brussels at the reported plan to undermine the withdrawal pact. Also read: British PM Boris Johnson sets October 15 as deadline for Brexit negotiations with EU "I trust the British government to implement the Withdrawal Agreement, an obligation under international law & prerequisite for any future partnership," said Ursula von der Leyen, head of the European Commission. "Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland is essential to protect peace and stability on the island & integrity of the single market," she added on Twitter. Leaders of Northern Ireland's Sinn Fein and SDLP parties, the region's two largest Irish nationalist groups, also criticised the government's reported plan. British Environment Secretary George Eustice said the government was committed to implementing the Withdrawal Agreement but some legal ambiguities needed to be tidied up over the Northern Irish protocol. "We are not moving the goal posts," he told Sky News. EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier acknowledged anxiety but declined to comment on the FT report. "I remain worried ... the negotiations are difficult, because the British want the best of both worlds," he told France Inter radio. If no deal is agreed, Britain would have a trading relationship with the bloc like Australia's, which would be "a good outcome", Johnson was also to say on Monday. Australia is negotiating a free trade deal with the EU to improve its market access, but for now largely trades with the bloc on World Trade Organization terms.

Brexit back in crisis as UK threatens to undercut divorce pact

EU leader Ursula von der Leyen warned Monday that Britain is legally obliged to respect the Brexit withdrawal agreement, which must form the basis on any future relationship.

"I trust the British government to implement the Withdrawal Agreement, an obligation under international law and prerequisite for any future partnership," the president of the European Commission said.

Von der Leyen issued her warning&nbsp;after British Prime Minister Boris Johnson gave a deadline for a post-Brexit trade agreement with the European Union. He has set October 15 as the deadline, brushing off fears about "no-deal" chaos if talks fail.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/british-pm-boris-johnson-sets-october-15-as-deadline-for-brexit-negotiations-with-eu-325611" hreflang="en">British PM Boris Johnson sets October 15 as deadline for Brexit negotiations with EU</a>

This week, the eighth round of negotiations between the two will resume in London. Both sides talking increasingly tough, amid accusations of intransigence and political brinkmanship.

His EU opposite number, Michel Barnier, this week said the talks stood or failed on the need to get an accord on EU access to UK fishing waters and state aid rules, but Britain was giving no ground.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-wont-blink-first-uk-warns-the-eu-on-brexit-trade-negotiations-325513" hreflang="en">'We won't blink first': UK warns the EU on Brexit trade negotiations</a>

According to Brussels, it indicated that mid-October was the latest a deal could be struck, given the need for translation and ratification by the European Parliament.

Despite months of refusing to confirm a firm cut-off date, Johnson agreed.

"There needs to be an agreement with our European friends by the time of the European Council on October 15 if it's going to be in force by the end of the year," he said in remarks released by his office.

"So, there is no sense in thinking beyond that point. If we can't agree by then, then I do not see that there will be a free trade agreement between us."

If this happens, the United Kingdom will have an "Australia-style" deal with the EU or one similar to that agreed with Canada and other countries, he said.

Australia trades with the EU under World Trade Organization rules and tariffs. But Johnson, whose government had said it wanted a "zero tariff, zero quota" regime, insisted it would still be a "good outcome" for Britain.

EU leader Ursula von der Leyen warned Monday that Britain is legally obliged to respect the Brexit withdrawal agreement, which must form the basis on any future relationship.

EU leader Ursula von der Leyen warned Monday that Britain is legally obliged to respect the Brexit withdrawal agreement, which must form the basis on any future relationship. "I trust the British government to implement the Withdrawal Agreement, an obligation under international law and prerequisite for any future partnership," the president of the European Commission said. Von der Leyen issued her warning after British Prime Minister Boris Johnson gave a deadline for a post-Brexit trade agreement with the European Union. He has set October 15 as the deadline, brushing off fears about "no-deal" chaos if talks fail. Also read: British PM Boris Johnson sets October 15 as deadline for Brexit negotiations with EU This week, the eighth round of negotiations between the two will resume in London. Both sides talking increasingly tough, amid accusations of intransigence and political brinkmanship. His EU opposite number, Michel Barnier, this week said the talks stood or failed on the need to get an accord on EU access to UK fishing waters and state aid rules, but Britain was giving no ground. Also read: 'We won't blink first': UK warns the EU on Brexit trade negotiations According to Brussels, it indicated that mid-October was the latest a deal could be struck, given the need for translation and ratification by the European Parliament. Despite months of refusing to confirm a firm cut-off date, Johnson agreed. "There needs to be an agreement with our European friends by the time of the European Council on October 15 if it's going to be in force by the end of the year," he said in remarks released by his office. "So, there is no sense in thinking beyond that point. If we can't agree by then, then I do not see that there will be a free trade agreement between us." If this happens, the United Kingdom will have an "Australia-style" deal with the EU or one similar to that agreed with Canada and other countries, he said. Australia trades with the EU under World Trade Organization rules and tariffs. But Johnson, whose government had said it wanted a "zero tariff, zero quota" regime, insisted it would still be a "good outcome" for Britain.

European Union chief warns UK must respect Brexit withdrawal deal

Britain will not blink first in Brexit trade negotiations with the European Union and is not scared of a no-deal exit at the end of the year, the country's top Brexit negotiator warned the bloc on Sunday.

UK says, won't blink first on Brexit trade negotiations

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves le Drian had strong words for a man at his position as he weighed in on the ongoing negotiations between Britain and the European Union. While underlining that it was urgent that Britain and the EU reached trade deal swiftly he said that British 'did not seem to understand' that in an negotiation, discussion on all issues will take place.

There are many points of disagreement between the UK and the EU. Both sides are locked in negotiations that have not made much headway after Britain's exit (Brexit) from the EU on January 31.

The British people do not seem to understand that if one wants to negotate a good deal, one must talk about all issues," Le Drian told France Inter radio.

"It`s not going well, with only two months left, it is urgent, the countdown has started. We prefer to reach a deal but we need to discuss the whole package, including fisheries, to avoid a no-deal," he added.

Also Read: <a href="http://13.235.153.162/world/we-wont-blink-first-uk-warns-the-eu-on-brexit-trade-negotiations-325513">'We won't blink first': UK warns the EU on Brexit trade negotiations</a>

The United Kingdom formally left the EU on Jan. 31 but it remains in a transition phase under which EU rules still apply until Dec. 31, after which either a new trade regime comes into force or it will revert to rules set by the World Trade Organisation.

(With Reuters inputs)

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves le Drian had strong words for a man at his position as he weighed in on the ongoing negotiations between Britain and the European Union.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves le Drian had strong words for a man at his position as he weighed in on the ongoing negotiations between Britain and the European Union. While underlining that it was urgent that Britain and the EU reached trade deal swiftly he said that British 'did not seem to understand' that in an negotiation, discussion on all issues will take place. There are many points of disagreement between the UK and the EU. Both sides are locked in negotiations that have not made much headway after Britain's exit (Brexit) from the EU on January 31. The British people do not seem to understand that if one wants to negotate a good deal, one must talk about all issues," Le Drian told France Inter radio. "It`s not going well, with only two months left, it is urgent, the countdown has started. We prefer to reach a deal but we need to discuss the whole package, including fisheries, to avoid a no-deal," he added. Also Read: 'We won't blink first': UK warns the EU on Brexit trade negotiations The United Kingdom formally left the EU on Jan. 31 but it remains in a transition phase under which EU rules still apply until Dec. 31, after which either a new trade regime comes into force or it will revert to rules set by the World Trade Organisation. (With Reuters inputs)

Brexit trade deal: Brits 'do not understand', says French foreign minister

Britain's top Brexit negotiator warned the European Union that the island country will not blink first in trade negotiations with the EU and is not scared of a no-deal exit.

Britain's top Brexit negotiator warned the European Union that the island country will not blink first in trade negotiations with the EU and is not scared of a no-deal exit. Britain left the European Union on January 31. However, talks have so far made little headway on agreeing on a new trade deal with the bloc by the time a status-quo transition arrangement ends in December. Also read: 'Major incident' in Birmingham after several stabbed: British police "We came in after a government and negotiating team that had blinked and had its bluff called at critical moments and the EU had learned not to take our word seriously," negotiator David Frost told the Mail on Sunday. "So a lot of what we are trying to do this year is to get them to realise that we mean what we say and they should take our position seriously," he was quoted as saying. According to Britain, the EU is dragging its feet in talks and has failed to fully accept that it is now an independent country. "We are not going to be a client state. We are not going to compromise on the fundamentals of having control over our own laws," Frost told the Mail. "We are not going to accept level playing field provisions that lock us in to the way the EU do things," he added. "That's what being an independent country is about, that's what the British people voted for and that's what will happen at the end of the year, come what may," Frost said. As per Frost, a lot of preparation had been done for a possible exit without a trade deal. "I don't think that we are scared of this at all," Frost said. "If we can reach an agreement that regulates trade like Canada's, great. If we can't, it will be an Australian-like trading agreement and we are fully ready for that." (Inputs from Reuters)

'We won't blink first': UK warns the EU on Brexit trade negotiations

There is no evidence of Russian meddling in the 2016 Brexit referendum and Britain's spies did not take their eyes off the ball on Russia, British Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said on Wednesday.

The British parliament's intelligence and security committee said in a report published on Tuesday that Russia had interfered in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum but it had not seen hard evidence of Russian meddling in the Brexit vote.

While the lawmakers noted allegations of meddling in Brexit, and some studies pointed to Russian attempts to influence the campaign, they said the British government and intelligence agencies had not sought out evidence of Russian interference.

"There needs to be some evidence that there's an issue there - which there isn't," Shapps told Sky when asked if there should be a further investigation of possible Russian meddling in the European Union referendum.

"I don't think it's the case that the intelligence services took their eye off the ball," Shapps told Sky.

The victory of opponents of EU membership in the 2016 referendum result sent shockwaves across the world as it signalled that one of the pillars of the West would split from the post-World Two attempts at European integration.

Russia has repeatedly denied meddling in the West, casting the United States and Britain as gripped by anti-Russian hysteria. The British government has repeatedly said there is no evidence of successful Russian interference in Brexit.

The so-called Russia Report by parliament's intelligence committee called for British spies to produce an assessment of Russian interference in the EU referendum.

The report casts Russia as a hostile power which posed a significant threat to Britain and the West across a range of fronts, from espionage and cyber to election meddling and laundering dirty money.

"The UK welcomed Russian money, and few questions - if any - were asked about the provenance of this considerable wealth," the report said. "The UK has been viewed as a particularly favourable destination for Russian oligarchs and their money."

"It offered ideal mechanisms by which illicit finance could be recycled through what has been referred to as the London 'laundromat'," the report said.

Asked about dirty Russian money, Shapps said: "This is not the place to come and launder money."

There is no evidence of Russian meddling in the 2016 Brexit referendum and Britain's spies did not take their eyes off the ball on Russia, British Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said on Wednesday.

There is no evidence of Russian meddling in the 2016 Brexit referendum and Britain's spies did not take their eyes off the ball on Russia, British Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said on Wednesday. The British parliament's intelligence and security committee said in a report published on Tuesday that Russia had interfered in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum but it had not seen hard evidence of Russian meddling in the Brexit vote. While the lawmakers noted allegations of meddling in Brexit, and some studies pointed to Russian attempts to influence the campaign, they said the British government and intelligence agencies had not sought out evidence of Russian interference. "There needs to be some evidence that there's an issue there - which there isn't," Shapps told Sky when asked if there should be a further investigation of possible Russian meddling in the European Union referendum. "I don't think it's the case that the intelligence services took their eye off the ball," Shapps told Sky. The victory of opponents of EU membership in the 2016 referendum result sent shockwaves across the world as it signalled that one of the pillars of the West would split from the post-World Two attempts at European integration. Russia has repeatedly denied meddling in the West, casting the United States and Britain as gripped by anti-Russian hysteria. The British government has repeatedly said there is no evidence of successful Russian interference in Brexit. The so-called Russia Report by parliament's intelligence committee called for British spies to produce an assessment of Russian interference in the EU referendum. The report casts Russia as a hostile power which posed a significant threat to Britain and the West across a range of fronts, from espionage and cyber to election meddling and laundering dirty money. "The UK welcomed Russian money, and few questions - if any - were asked about the provenance of this considerable wealth," the report said. "The UK has been viewed as a particularly favourable destination for Russian oligarchs and their money." "It offered ideal mechanisms by which illicit finance could be recycled through what has been referred to as the London 'laundromat'," the report said. Asked about dirty Russian money, Shapps said: "This is not the place to come and launder money."

UK says there is no evidence of Russian meddling in Brexit vote

Russia sees the United Kingdom as the main target in the West, as per the Intelligence and Security Committee's report. The new report said that Russia's influence in the UK is "the new normal".

Russia sees the United Kingdom as the main target in the West, as per the Intelligence and Security Committee's report. The new report said that Russia's influence in the UK is "the new normal". Also read: UK borrowing feels the pandemic, goes over record $162 billion "In brief, Russian influence in the UK is ‘the new normal’, and there are a lot of Russians with very close links to Putin who are well integrated into the UK business and social scene, and accepted because of their wealth," the report said. The much-awaited report has criticised and accused successive British governments of welcoming Russia's oligarchs "with open arms". The committee has accused the Downing Street of delaying the publication of the report ahead of December's UK election and has called for "immediate action" and should help intelligence services tackle "this very capable adversary". However, Downing Street has denied the allegations. Keven Jones, one of the ISC's committee members, criticised Boris Johnson for not publishing it sooner as there was "no reason for delay". "There should have been assessment of Russian interference in the referendum. And there must now be one, and the public must be told the results of that assessment," intelligence and security committee member Kevan Jones said. According to the parliamentary report, the British government should properly investigate any Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum after failing to look into it despite past evidence of Moscow meddling. (Inputs from AFP)

UK 'top target' for Russia, says intelligence report

Britain is urging businesses and individuals to prepare for the Dec. 31 end of the Brexit transition period with an information campaign titled: "The UK's new start: let's get going."

Britain left the European Union on Jan&nbsp;31, three and a half years after a referendum, but a transition period has delayed any major change in the relationship.

The two sides have been working to agree a trade deal ahead of that period expiring at the end of the year.

Cabinet Minister Michael Gove said on Sunday progress was being made in talks but there were still divisions.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="/technology/huawei-to-request-uk-to-delay-5g-network-removal-312661" hreflang="en">Huawei to request UK to delay 5G network removal</a>

"At the end of this year we are leaving the single market and Customs Union regardless of the type of agreement we reach with the EU," he said. "This will bring changes and significant opportunities for which we all need to prepare."

The information campaign will launch on Monday, the government said, with ads appearing on TV, radio, billboards and online.&nbsp;

A survey from lobby group the Institute of Directors (IoD) said only a quarter of companies were fully ready for the end of the transition period.

Nearly half of 978 company directors polled in late June said they were not able to prepare right now, with one in seven distracted by the coronavirus and almost a third saying they needed details of changes to be clear, the IoD said.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="/world/freeports-tax-cuts-uks-road-to-becoming-fully-independent-from-eu-312647" hreflang="en">'Freeports,' tax cuts: UK's road to becoming fully independent from EU</a>

"With so much going on, many directors feel that preparing for Brexit proper is like trying to hit a moving target," said IoD Director General Jonathan Geldart. "Jumping immediately into whatever comes next would be a nightmare for many businesses."

The campaign targets Britons intending to travel to the EU from Jan. 1, importers and exporters, UK nationals abroad, and EU, European Economic Area and Swiss nationals living in Britain.

Britain is urging businesses and individuals to prepare for the Dec. 31 end of the Brexit transition period with an information campaign titled: "The UK's new start: let's get going.

Britain is urging businesses and individuals to prepare for the Dec. 31 end of the Brexit transition period with an information campaign titled: "The UK's new start: let's get going." Britain left the European Union on Jan 31, three and a half years after a referendum, but a transition period has delayed any major change in the relationship. The two sides have been working to agree a trade deal ahead of that period expiring at the end of the year. Cabinet Minister Michael Gove said on Sunday progress was being made in talks but there were still divisions. Also read: Huawei to request UK to delay 5G network removal "At the end of this year we are leaving the single market and Customs Union regardless of the type of agreement we reach with the EU," he said. "This will bring changes and significant opportunities for which we all need to prepare." The information campaign will launch on Monday, the government said, with ads appearing on TV, radio, billboards and online. A survey from lobby group the Institute of Directors (IoD) said only a quarter of companies were fully ready for the end of the transition period. Nearly half of 978 company directors polled in late June said they were not able to prepare right now, with one in seven distracted by the coronavirus and almost a third saying they needed details of changes to be clear, the IoD said. Also read: 'Freeports,' tax cuts: UK's road to becoming fully independent from EU "With so much going on, many directors feel that preparing for Brexit proper is like trying to hit a moving target," said IoD Director General Jonathan Geldart. "Jumping immediately into whatever comes next would be a nightmare for many businesses." The campaign targets Britons intending to travel to the EU from Jan. 1, importers and exporters, UK nationals abroad, and EU, European Economic Area and Swiss nationals living in Britain.

'Let's get going': UK tells businesses to prepare for Brexit crunch

Incumbent Andrzej Duda was marginally ahead in Poland`s presidential election on Sunday, an exit poll found, in a result seen as likely to have profound implications for Warsaw`s relations with the rest of the European Union.

The re-election of Duda, an ally of the ruling nationalists Law and Justice (PiS), is crucial if the government is to implement in full its conservative agenda, including judicial reforms that the European Union says are undemocratic.

Duda`s challenger, liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, has pledged to repair Poland`s relations with Europe and use the presidential veto power to hold back any legislation that would subvert the rule of law.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/poland-holds-momentous-tight-presidential-election-runoff-312727">Also read:&nbsp;Poland holds momentous, tight presidential election runoff</a>

The exit poll by Ipsos showed Duda winning 50.4% of the vote, while Trzaskowski, the preferred candidate of the main opposition party, the centrist Civic Platform (PO), had 49.6%. Ipsos said it was too early to call a winner.

"All we need is to count the votes. The night will be tense but I am certain that when the votes are counted, we will win," Trzaskowski told supporters in a park just outside Warsaw`s historic Old Town.

Partial official results are expected on Monday.

Opinion polls before the election had shown the candidates, both 48, neck and neck, with Trzaskowski having closed the gap on Duda, who initially looked like a clear favourite.

Backed by the government, Duda ran an acrimonious campaign, laced with homophobic language, attacks on independent media and accusations levied against Trzaskowski that he would serve foreign interests instead of Poland`s.

Duda, a devout believer, had painted himself as a defender of Catholic values and of the government`s generous social benefit programmes that have transformed life for many, especially in the poorer rural regions of the country.

He appeared conciliatory on Sunday. "If anyone was offended by anything I did or said in the last five years, not just during the campaign, please accept my apology," he told supporters in Pultusk, a small town north of the capital.

Duda has also championed large infrastructure projects, which he says will create jobs and boost the country`s autonomy and international standing.

Lethal Danger 
For many religious conservatives in Poland, Trzaskowski came to represent the threats facing traditional values when he pledged to introduce education about LGBT rights in the city`s schools.

The archbishop of Krakow, Marek Jedraszewski, told worshippers in the southern city of Czestochowa on Saturday that Poland faced a "lethal danger" from ideologies that seek to undermine the traditional family structure and corrupt children.

Trzaskowski says he seeks a more tolerant Poland and has criticised PiS` rhetoric, vowing to abolish state news channel TVP Info, which critics say gave overt support to Duda in its programming.

"In politics, you should have opponents, not enemies," Trzaskowski said on Sunday. "They thought they had full power, but today they have fear in their eyes."

Duda` re-election to a second five-year term would open up the prospect of three years of uninterrupted rule by PiS, which controls the lower house of parliament, with the next national election scheduled for 2023.

Observers say his defeat could undermine the fragile parliamentary majority that supports the PiS government, raising the spectre of political instability as Poland is coping with the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic.

The election is being closely watched in Brussels.

Before PiS and Duda came to power in 2015, Poland had one of the most pro-European administrations in the bloc`s ex-communist east. But it has grown increasingly isolated, with divisions focusing on climate change and migration, in addition to democratic norms.

Incumbent Andrzej Duda was marginally ahead in Poland`s presidential election on Sunday, an exit poll found, in a result seen as likely to have profound implications for Warsaw`s relations with the rest of the European Union.

Incumbent Andrzej Duda was marginally ahead in Poland`s presidential election on Sunday, an exit poll found, in a result seen as likely to have profound implications for Warsaw`s relations with the rest of the European Union. The re-election of Duda, an ally of the ruling nationalists Law and Justice (PiS), is crucial if the government is to implement in full its conservative agenda, including judicial reforms that the European Union says are undemocratic. Duda`s challenger, liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, has pledged to repair Poland`s relations with Europe and use the presidential veto power to hold back any legislation that would subvert the rule of law. Also read: Poland holds momentous, tight presidential election runoff The exit poll by Ipsos showed Duda winning 50.4% of the vote, while Trzaskowski, the preferred candidate of the main opposition party, the centrist Civic Platform (PO), had 49.6%. Ipsos said it was too early to call a winner. "All we need is to count the votes. The night will be tense but I am certain that when the votes are counted, we will win," Trzaskowski told supporters in a park just outside Warsaw`s historic Old Town. Partial official results are expected on Monday. Opinion polls before the election had shown the candidates, both 48, neck and neck, with Trzaskowski having closed the gap on Duda, who initially looked like a clear favourite. Backed by the government, Duda ran an acrimonious campaign, laced with homophobic language, attacks on independent media and accusations levied against Trzaskowski that he would serve foreign interests instead of Poland`s. Duda, a devout believer, had painted himself as a defender of Catholic values and of the government`s generous social benefit programmes that have transformed life for many, especially in the poorer rural regions of the country. He appeared conciliatory on Sunday. "If anyone was offended by anything I did or said in the last five years, not just during the campaign, please accept my apology," he told supporters in Pultusk, a small town north of the capital. Duda has also championed large infrastructure projects, which he says will create jobs and boost the country`s autonomy and international standing. Lethal Danger For many religious conservatives in Poland, Trzaskowski came to represent the threats facing traditional values when he pledged to introduce education about LGBT rights in the city`s schools. The archbishop of Krakow, Marek Jedraszewski, told worshippers in the southern city of Czestochowa on Saturday that Poland faced a "lethal danger" from ideologies that seek to undermine the traditional family structure and corrupt children. Trzaskowski says he seeks a more tolerant Poland and has criticised PiS` rhetoric, vowing to abolish state news channel TVP Info, which critics say gave overt support to Duda in its programming. "In politics, you should have opponents, not enemies," Trzaskowski said on Sunday. "They thought they had full power, but today they have fear in their eyes." Duda` re-election to a second five-year term would open up the prospect of three years of uninterrupted rule by PiS, which controls the lower house of parliament, with the next national election scheduled for 2023. Observers say his defeat could undermine the fragile parliamentary majority that supports the PiS government, raising the spectre of political instability as Poland is coping with the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic. The election is being closely watched in Brussels. Before PiS and Duda came to power in 2015, Poland had one of the most pro-European administrations in the bloc`s ex-communist east. But it has grown increasingly isolated, with divisions focusing on climate change and migration, in addition to democratic norms.

Polish presidential election too close to call, incumbent marginally ahead

Voting started Sunday in Poland's razor-blade-close presidential election runoff between the conservative incumbent Andrzej Duda and liberal, pro-European Union Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski.

Duda is backed by the ruling right-wing party and the government, as he seeks a second 5-year term. Trzaskowski, a former European Parliament lawmaker, runs for the main opposition Civic Platform party. Both candidates are aged 48.

Latest polls showed that the race may be decided by a very small margin. Amid calls from both sides to some 30 million eligible voters to cast ballots, turnout is expected to be higher than the 64.51% in the first round on June 28. 
In the first round, Duda got 43.5% and Trzaskowski 30.5%.

Voting stations remain open until 9 pm (1900 GMT,) when exit polls will be released. The final official results are expected early in the week.

The outcome of the election will decide the shape of politics in deeply divided Poland at least until 2023, when parliamentary elections are scheduled.

If Duda is reelected, the right-wing Law and Justice party that backs him will continue to have a close ally in the president and maintain its hold on almost all key instruments of power in the country.

Trzaskowski's win would give him the power to veto laws passed by the ruling party. Poland's tone would also be softened on the international arena and especially with the EU.

The voting is held under strict sanitary conditions due to the still spreading coronavirus. Poland registered over 37,000 infections and almost 1,600 deaths.

Voters must wear masks and gloves, maintain a safe distance and use hand sanitiser. They can use their own pens to mark ballots. Election officials must wear masks too and sit wide apart from each other. Ballot boxes will be regularly disinfected and the polling stations will be ventilated.

Voting started Sunday in Poland's razor-blade-close presidential election runoff between the conservative incumbent Andrzej Duda and liberal, pro-European Union Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski.

Voting started Sunday in Poland's razor-blade-close presidential election runoff between the conservative incumbent Andrzej Duda and liberal, pro-European Union Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski. Duda is backed by the ruling right-wing party and the government, as he seeks a second 5-year term. Trzaskowski, a former European Parliament lawmaker, runs for the main opposition Civic Platform party. Both candidates are aged 48. Latest polls showed that the race may be decided by a very small margin. Amid calls from both sides to some 30 million eligible voters to cast ballots, turnout is expected to be higher than the 64.51% in the first round on June 28. In the first round, Duda got 43.5% and Trzaskowski 30.5%. Voting stations remain open until 9 pm (1900 GMT,) when exit polls will be released. The final official results are expected early in the week. The outcome of the election will decide the shape of politics in deeply divided Poland at least until 2023, when parliamentary elections are scheduled. If Duda is reelected, the right-wing Law and Justice party that backs him will continue to have a close ally in the president and maintain its hold on almost all key instruments of power in the country. Trzaskowski's win would give him the power to veto laws passed by the ruling party. Poland's tone would also be softened on the international arena and especially with the EU. The voting is held under strict sanitary conditions due to the still spreading coronavirus. Poland registered over 37,000 infections and almost 1,600 deaths. Voters must wear masks and gloves, maintain a safe distance and use hand sanitiser. They can use their own pens to mark ballots. Election officials must wear masks too and sit wide apart from each other. Ballot boxes will be regularly disinfected and the polling stations will be ventilated.

Poland holds momentous, tight presidential election runoff

The European Union must prepare for the possibility that talks with Britain on their post-Brexit relationship could fail, Chancellor Angela Merkel warned Wednesday as Germany took the helm of the bloc's rotating presidency.

After months of standstill because of the coronavirus, the two sides resumed negotiations this week on how to define Britain's future economic ties with the bloc, but the tone has hardened in both camps.

"I will keep pushing for a good solution, but the EU and Germany too must and should prepare for the case that an agreement is not reached," Merkel told German lawmakers in Berlin.

The veteran leader was speaking on the first day of Germany's six-month EU presidency, set to be dominated by the coronavirus pandemic and its economic fallout.

But Britain's divorce will loom large too, since London and Brussels only have until the end of December to clinch a new agreement or end their half-century relationship without specific plans for how they plan to trade or coexist in other fields.&nbsp;

Without a deal, ties would be reduced to minimum standards set by the World Trade Organization with high tariffs and serious disruptions to business.

Merkel already warned last week that Britain would "have to live with the consequences" of weaker trade ties with the EU in a no-deal outcome.

SERIOUS TIMES

Germany has set itself an ambitious agenda for the EU presidency, which observers say may be the last chance for outgoing chancellor Merkel to shape her European legacy.

Her main goal is to push through a massive economic recovery plan to help the 27-member club cope with its steepest recession since World War II, triggered by a pandemic that has so far killed more than 500,000 people worldwide.

"We are living in very serious times and need to react accordingly," Merkel told German MPs.

The chancellor, who has just over a year left in her final term, has thrown her political weight behind the proposed 750-billion-euro ($843-billion) recovery fund.

The fund would controversially be financed through shared EU borrowing, in a stunning U-turn for Germany after years of opposition to debt pooling.

"An extraordinary situation requires a special solution," said Merkel.&nbsp;

The first big test of Germany's EU custodianship will come at a July 17-18 EU summit, where Merkel hopes leaders will reach an agreement on the recovery fund.

The money is expected to come mainly in the form of grants for countries hit hardest by the pandemic, such as debt-laden Italy and Spain.

But so-called frugal nations including Austria and the Netherlands want to rein in the spending and are insisting on loans rather than grants.

Merkel has urged holdout nations to show unprecedented solidarity with hard-hit neighbours, warning that an uneven recovery could undermine the EU single market and end up harming stronger economies too.

But "member states' positions are still very far apart" on the matter, she admitted.

If accepted, the rescue fund would be a milestone for EU unity.

It would also be a big win for Berlin, and could ease some of the lingering resentment from the eurozone debt crisis a decade ago when Merkel's government insisted on harsh austerity for struggling nations like Greece.

GREEN FUTURE

Merkel has stressed the need for the bloc to prepare for the post-pandemic future, including through a more unified approach to health issues and by investing in climate-friendly projects.

Environmental demonstrators gathered outside the chancellery Wednesday with bags of fake euro banknotes to demand that any coronavirus stimulus be spent on "a green and just future".

At a Berlin press conference, Economy Minister Peter Altmaier said Germany supported the bloc's goal to become carbon neutral by 2050.

He also said Germany would use its EU presidency to push for "more robust" supply chains within the EU after the virus outbreak left member states scrambling to secure protective gear mainly made in China.

Berlin would fight to make progress "as quickly as possible" on a EU-China investment agreement aimed at levelling the playing field, he said.

The European Union must prepare for the possibility that talks with Britain on their post-Brexit relationship could fail, Chancellor Angela Merkel warned Wednesday as Germany took the helm of the bloc's rotating presidency.

The European Union must prepare for the possibility that talks with Britain on their post-Brexit relationship could fail, Chancellor Angela Merkel warned Wednesday as Germany took the helm of the bloc's rotating presidency. After months of standstill because of the coronavirus, the two sides resumed negotiations this week on how to define Britain's future economic ties with the bloc, but the tone has hardened in both camps. "I will keep pushing for a good solution, but the EU and Germany too must and should prepare for the case that an agreement is not reached," Merkel told German lawmakers in Berlin. The veteran leader was speaking on the first day of Germany's six-month EU presidency, set to be dominated by the coronavirus pandemic and its economic fallout. But Britain's divorce will loom large too, since London and Brussels only have until the end of December to clinch a new agreement or end their half-century relationship without specific plans for how they plan to trade or coexist in other fields. Without a deal, ties would be reduced to minimum standards set by the World Trade Organization with high tariffs and serious disruptions to business. Merkel already warned last week that Britain would "have to live with the consequences" of weaker trade ties with the EU in a no-deal outcome. SERIOUS TIMES Germany has set itself an ambitious agenda for the EU presidency, which observers say may be the last chance for outgoing chancellor Merkel to shape her European legacy. Her main goal is to push through a massive economic recovery plan to help the 27-member club cope with its steepest recession since World War II, triggered by a pandemic that has so far killed more than 500,000 people worldwide. "We are living in very serious times and need to react accordingly," Merkel told German MPs. The chancellor, who has just over a year left in her final term, has thrown her political weight behind the proposed 750-billion-euro ($843-billion) recovery fund. The fund would controversially be financed through shared EU borrowing, in a stunning U-turn for Germany after years of opposition to debt pooling. "An extraordinary situation requires a special solution," said Merkel. The first big test of Germany's EU custodianship will come at a July 17-18 EU summit, where Merkel hopes leaders will reach an agreement on the recovery fund. The money is expected to come mainly in the form of grants for countries hit hardest by the pandemic, such as debt-laden Italy and Spain. But so-called frugal nations including Austria and the Netherlands want to rein in the spending and are insisting on loans rather than grants. Merkel has urged holdout nations to show unprecedented solidarity with hard-hit neighbours, warning that an uneven recovery could undermine the EU single market and end up harming stronger economies too. But "member states' positions are still very far apart" on the matter, she admitted. If accepted, the rescue fund would be a milestone for EU unity. It would also be a big win for Berlin, and could ease some of the lingering resentment from the eurozone debt crisis a decade ago when Merkel's government insisted on harsh austerity for struggling nations like Greece. GREEN FUTURE Merkel has stressed the need for the bloc to prepare for the post-pandemic future, including through a more unified approach to health issues and by investing in climate-friendly projects. Environmental demonstrators gathered outside the chancellery Wednesday with bags of fake euro banknotes to demand that any coronavirus stimulus be spent on "a green and just future". At a Berlin press conference, Economy Minister Peter Altmaier said Germany supported the bloc's goal to become carbon neutral by 2050. He also said Germany would use its EU presidency to push for "more robust" supply chains within the EU after the virus outbreak left member states scrambling to secure protective gear mainly made in China. Berlin would fight to make progress "as quickly as possible" on a EU-China investment agreement aimed at levelling the playing field, he said.

Merkel kicks off EU presidency with Brexit warning

Britain says it will be ready to quit its transitional arrangements with the European Union “on Australia terms” if no deal on their future relationship is reached.

Britain left the bloc on January 31, 2020. A transition period, during which Britain remains in the European single market and customs union, expires on December 31 and pressure is mounting to agree a free trade deal before then.

With the two sides still far apart, a round of “intensified negotiations” is due to start next week.

“He [UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson] said the UK would negotiate constructively but equally would be ready to leave the transition period on Australia terms if agreement could not be reached,” Downing Street office said in a statement.

Australia does not have a comprehensive trade agreement with the EU. Much of EU-Australia trade follows default World Trade Organisation rules, though specific agreements are in place for certain goods.

Britain says it will be ready to quit its transitional arrangements with the European Union “on Australia terms” if no deal on their future relationship is reached.

Britain says it will be ready to quit its transitional arrangements with the European Union “on Australia terms” if no deal on their future relationship is reached. Britain left the bloc on January 31, 2020. A transition period, during which Britain remains in the European single market and customs union, expires on December 31 and pressure is mounting to agree a free trade deal before then. With the two sides still far apart, a round of “intensified negotiations” is due to start next week. “He [UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson] said the UK would negotiate constructively but equally would be ready to leave the transition period on Australia terms if agreement could not be reached,” Downing Street office said in a statement. Australia does not have a comprehensive trade agreement with the EU. Much of EU-Australia trade follows default World Trade Organisation rules, though specific agreements are in place for certain goods.

UK ready to quit EU on 'Australia terms' if no Brexit deal, PM Johnson says

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said that UK will have to accept the consequences of having&nbsp;weaker economic links with the European Union (EU) post Brexit.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iceland-president-set-for-landslide-election-win-309002" hreflang="en">Iceland president set for landslide election win</a>

Merkel said these statements while talking about the future relations between Brussels and London after Britain leaves the union.&nbsp;

In an interview with Europa newspaper alliance, Merkel said that the British PM Boris Johnson "will of course have to accept the consequences -- that is, an economy less tightly linked" with the EU.&nbsp;

Britain left the EU in January and will no longer be required to follow the bloc's financial rules after December, when a transition period ends, whereas, Germany is set &nbsp;to take over the EU's rotating presidency for six months from July 1.

"We must get away from the idea that it is we who define what the United Kingdom may wish," indicated Merkel, who has consistently sought to help bring about an outcome which avoids a hard Brexit.

"The United Kingdom defines and we, as the EU27, make an appropriate response," said Merkel.

"If the United Kingdom does not want regulations comparable to that of Europe in terms of the environment, the labour market or social norms, our relations will lose intensity," she observed.

The European Union has to find a way &nbsp;through tough negotiations on a 750 billion ($800 billion) post-coronavirus euro recovery fund for countries worst hit by the pandemic.&nbsp;

For Merkel, the fund "cannot resolve all of Europe's problems" but the bloc must "act quickly in the face of the pandemic given the huge hit the virus has dealt jobs and the economy."

Merkel feared that the results could have an "explosive political impact" that could threaten democracy.

"For Europe to survive, its economy must also survive," she concluded.

(Inputs from AFP)

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said that UK will have to accept the consequences of having weaker economic links with the European Union (EU) post Brexit. Also read: Iceland president set for landslide election win Merkel said these statements while talking about the future relations between Brussels and London after Britain leaves the union.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said that UK will have to accept the consequences of having weaker economic links with the European Union (EU) post Brexit. Also read: Iceland president set for landslide election win Merkel said these statements while talking about the future relations between Brussels and London after Britain leaves the union. In an interview with Europa newspaper alliance, Merkel said that the British PM Boris Johnson "will of course have to accept the consequences -- that is, an economy less tightly linked" with the EU. Britain left the EU in January and will no longer be required to follow the bloc's financial rules after December, when a transition period ends, whereas, Germany is set to take over the EU's rotating presidency for six months from July 1. "We must get away from the idea that it is we who define what the United Kingdom may wish," indicated Merkel, who has consistently sought to help bring about an outcome which avoids a hard Brexit. "The United Kingdom defines and we, as the EU27, make an appropriate response," said Merkel. "If the United Kingdom does not want regulations comparable to that of Europe in terms of the environment, the labour market or social norms, our relations will lose intensity," she observed. The European Union has to find a way through tough negotiations on a 750 billion ($800 billion) post-coronavirus euro recovery fund for countries worst hit by the pandemic. For Merkel, the fund "cannot resolve all of Europe's problems" but the bloc must "act quickly in the face of the pandemic given the huge hit the virus has dealt jobs and the economy." Merkel feared that the results could have an "explosive political impact" that could threaten democracy. "For Europe to survive, its economy must also survive," she concluded. (Inputs from AFP)

'Britain will have weaker economic ties with EU post Brexit': Angela Merkel

Britain will "tailor" capital rules for insurers inherited from the European Union as it takes back control of its crucial financial services sector, finance minister Rishi Sunak said on Tuesday.

Britain left the EU in January and will no longer be required to follow the bloc's financial rules after December, when a transition period ends.

Sunak set out on Tuesday how the government intends to regulate Europe's biggest financial sector, saying that it would make reforms to maintain the soundness of capital markets and manage future risks.

EU capital rules for insurers, known as Solvency II, have long been criticised by UK lawmakers as too inflexible, and the government start reviewing them in the autumn.

"The government ... plans to bring forward a review of certain features of Solvency II to ensure that it is properly tailored to take account of the structural features of the UK insurance sector," Sunak said.

Britain will also make existing retail customer disclosure rules known as PRIIPs function better, he said.

Outside the EU, Britain will come under more pressure to keep its financial services sector globally competitive.

The EU is the biggest export customer for Britain's financial services and Sunak said an "enduring future relationship" with the bloc would help to complement the UK’s leading global role in financial services:

"The government continues to believe that comprehensive mutual findings of equivalence between the UK and the EU are in the best interests of both parties, and we remain open and committed to continuing dialogue with the EU about their intentions in this respect."

Direct access to EU markets for financial firms from Britain will depend on whether Brussels deems UK rules to be "equivalent" - or as robust as those in the bloc. Both sides have agreed that such an assessment should be completed by the end of this month.

Britain will "tailor" capital rules for insurers inherited from the European Union as it takes back control of its crucial financial services sector, finance minister Rishi Sunak said on Tuesday.

Britain will "tailor" capital rules for insurers inherited from the European Union as it takes back control of its crucial financial services sector, finance minister Rishi Sunak said on Tuesday. Britain left the EU in January and will no longer be required to follow the bloc's financial rules after December, when a transition period ends. Sunak set out on Tuesday how the government intends to regulate Europe's biggest financial sector, saying that it would make reforms to maintain the soundness of capital markets and manage future risks. EU capital rules for insurers, known as Solvency II, have long been criticised by UK lawmakers as too inflexible, and the government start reviewing them in the autumn. "The government ... plans to bring forward a review of certain features of Solvency II to ensure that it is properly tailored to take account of the structural features of the UK insurance sector," Sunak said. Britain will also make existing retail customer disclosure rules known as PRIIPs function better, he said. Outside the EU, Britain will come under more pressure to keep its financial services sector globally competitive. The EU is the biggest export customer for Britain's financial services and Sunak said an "enduring future relationship" with the bloc would help to complement the UK’s leading global role in financial services: "The government continues to believe that comprehensive mutual findings of equivalence between the UK and the EU are in the best interests of both parties, and we remain open and committed to continuing dialogue with the EU about their intentions in this respect." Direct access to EU markets for financial firms from Britain will depend on whether Brussels deems UK rules to be "equivalent" - or as robust as those in the bloc. Both sides have agreed that such an assessment should be completed by the end of this month.

Britain sets out how it will regulate the City after Brexit

A military plane used by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other senior government VIPs -- Royal Air Force (RAF) Voyager aircraft -- is set to undergo a so-called Brexit makeover with the red, white and blue colours of the UK's Union Jack flag.

The aircraft is slated to have its current grey look refurbished, indicating the UK Prime Minister's intention to use the plane for global Britain trade missions as the UK's transition period before a complete exit from the European Union (EU) concludes at the end of this year.

The plane is being repainted at a specialist secure hangar run by Marshall Aerospace near Cambridge.

The aircraft, often likened to the US President's Air Force One, was commissioned at a cost of GBP 10-million by former UK Prime Minister David Cameron and was intended to have a dual civilian and military use.

When Johnson was Foreign Secretary in the Theresa May led government in 2018, he had expressed his wish for a "Brexit plane" to help him travel the world and strike new trade agreements.

The twin-engine A330 Voyager jet is earmarked for use by the UK prime minister, Foreign Secretary and senior members of the Royal Family. It was acquired by the RAF as a troop carrier and air tanker before undergoing the Cameron-led makeover in 2016, lending it an initial reference of 'Cam Force One'.

A military plane used by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other senior government VIPs -- Royal Air Force (RAF) Voyager aircraft -- is set to undergo a so-called Brexit makeover with the red, white and blue colours of the UK's Union Jack flag.

A military plane used by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other senior government VIPs -- Royal Air Force (RAF) Voyager aircraft -- is set to undergo a so-called Brexit makeover with the red, white and blue colours of the UK's Union Jack flag. The aircraft is slated to have its current grey look refurbished, indicating the UK Prime Minister's intention to use the plane for global Britain trade missions as the UK's transition period before a complete exit from the European Union (EU) concludes at the end of this year. The plane is being repainted at a specialist secure hangar run by Marshall Aerospace near Cambridge. The aircraft, often likened to the US President's Air Force One, was commissioned at a cost of GBP 10-million by former UK Prime Minister David Cameron and was intended to have a dual civilian and military use. When Johnson was Foreign Secretary in the Theresa May led government in 2018, he had expressed his wish for a "Brexit plane" to help him travel the world and strike new trade agreements. The twin-engine A330 Voyager jet is earmarked for use by the UK prime minister, Foreign Secretary and senior members of the Royal Family. It was acquired by the RAF as a troop carrier and air tanker before undergoing the Cameron-led makeover in 2016, lending it an initial reference of 'Cam Force One'.

UK PM Boris Johnson's jet to get 'Union Jack' makeover

Leaders from Britain and the European Union agreed on Monday that talks on their future relationship should be stepped up to clinch a deal, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggesting an agreement could be reached in July with "a bit of oomph".

With a status-quo transition deal set to run out at the end of the year, the two are seeking a free trade agreement. But businesses on both sides are being told to prepare for a no-deal outcome that some fear would complicate trade and hurt jobs.

"I don't think we're actually that far apart but what we need now is to see a bit of oomph in the negotiations," Johnson said, adding that he had told the EU's top representatives that there was a need to "put a tiger in the tank" of the talks.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/13-dairy-firms-causing-more-greenhouse-emissions-than-worlds-sixth-largest-economy-306083" hreflang="en">13 dairy firms causing more greenhouse emissions than world's sixth-largest economy</a>

"The faster we can do this the better, and we see no reason why you shouldn't get this done in July."

Earlier, after a video conference between Johnson, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the leaders of the European Council and European Parliament, the two sides said they "agreed ... that new momentum was required".

Britain left the EU on Jan. 31 and its relationship with the bloc is now governed by a transition arrangement that keeps previous rules in place while the two sides negotiate new terms.

Negotiators have made very little progress towards a trade pact, however, and the talks have all but stalled over issues such as fair-competition guarantees and fishing rights.

London confirmed last week that it had no intention of extending the transition period beyond 2020.

Some fear that, with the two sides so far apart and little time left to negotiate, London's decision not to extend may lead to a cliff edge that could compound the economic damage caused by the coronavirus crisis.

One EU diplomat said that, despite plans to speed up talks, major progress was unlikely until after the summer, when London would "scramble to get something done" at the 11th hour, as it did last year to reach a withdrawal agreement.

Jill Rutter, an expert at the UK in a Changing Europe think-tank, told a Brexit panel discussion on Monday that a "very thin and unambitious deal" was likely, but a no-deal scenario couldn't be ruled out.

"I think it would be totally wrong to think that the UK will be so desperate that it will move heaven and earth to avoid no deal," she said.

Leaders from Britain and the European Union agreed on Monday that talks on their future relationship should be stepped up to clinch a deal, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggesting an agreement could be reached in July with "a bit of oomph".

Leaders from Britain and the European Union agreed on Monday that talks on their future relationship should be stepped up to clinch a deal, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggesting an agreement could be reached in July with "a bit of oomph". With a status-quo transition deal set to run out at the end of the year, the two are seeking a free trade agreement. But businesses on both sides are being told to prepare for a no-deal outcome that some fear would complicate trade and hurt jobs. "I don't think we're actually that far apart but what we need now is to see a bit of oomph in the negotiations," Johnson said, adding that he had told the EU's top representatives that there was a need to "put a tiger in the tank" of the talks. Also read: 13 dairy firms causing more greenhouse emissions than world's sixth-largest economy "The faster we can do this the better, and we see no reason why you shouldn't get this done in July." Earlier, after a video conference between Johnson, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the leaders of the European Council and European Parliament, the two sides said they "agreed ... that new momentum was required". Britain left the EU on Jan. 31 and its relationship with the bloc is now governed by a transition arrangement that keeps previous rules in place while the two sides negotiate new terms. Negotiators have made very little progress towards a trade pact, however, and the talks have all but stalled over issues such as fair-competition guarantees and fishing rights. London confirmed last week that it had no intention of extending the transition period beyond 2020. Some fear that, with the two sides so far apart and little time left to negotiate, London's decision not to extend may lead to a cliff edge that could compound the economic damage caused by the coronavirus crisis. One EU diplomat said that, despite plans to speed up talks, major progress was unlikely until after the summer, when London would "scramble to get something done" at the 11th hour, as it did last year to reach a withdrawal agreement. Jill Rutter, an expert at the UK in a Changing Europe think-tank, told a Brexit panel discussion on Monday that a "very thin and unambitious deal" was likely, but a no-deal scenario couldn't be ruled out. "I think it would be totally wrong to think that the UK will be so desperate that it will move heaven and earth to avoid no deal," she said.

With a bit of oomph, Brexit deal feasible in July, says UK's Johnson

Germany said Thursday that Britain should give ground in Brexit trade talks and help break a stalemate in which both sides are dug into their positions.

While an agreement is possible, German EU ambassador Michael Clauss insists London will have to show "a more realistic approach" to reach one by the end of the year.

It was not possible for Britain to have "full sovereignty and at the same time full access to the EU's internal market," Clauss told a panel at the European Policy Centre think tank.

The EU and Britain are holding a fourth round of virtual talks on their future relations following the UK's split from the bloc after 40 years of membership.

Britain left the European Union on January 31 and is now in a transition period until the end of the year during which it enjoys the benefits of EU membership.&nbsp;

A meeting is planned for later in June between Prime Minister Boris Johnson, EU Council President Charles Michel and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to take stock of the situation.

Clauss said that the EU was working on the assumption that Britain would "not demand an extension" of the transition period beyond the end of the year.

Also see: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/chief-characters-in-britains-brexit-saga-277805">Chief characters in Britain's years-long Brexit saga</a>

Both sides are working towards establishing zero-tariff trade ties, but neither side have budged from their red lines.

Turning to other subjects, Clauss said a deal to establish a 750 billion euro&nbsp;recovery fund for Europe was possible this summer, but would be difficult.

Germany takes over the EU's six-month rotating presidency on July 1 and will be key to finding consensus among the 27 member states to approve the rescue plan.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-years-of-arguments-british-mps-set-to-finally-seal-brexit-deal-273199">After years of arguments, British MPs set to finally seal Brexit deal</a>

EU leaders are to hold a virtual meeting on June 19 to advance on the matter, but a European official on Wednesday said a deal would require a face-to-face summit, hopefully in July.

Germany said Thursday that Britain should give ground in Brexit trade talks and help break a stalemate in which both sides are dug into their positions. While an agreement is possible, German EU ambassador Michael Clauss insists London will have to show "a more realistic approach" to reach one by the end of the year.

Germany said Thursday that Britain should give ground in Brexit trade talks and help break a stalemate in which both sides are dug into their positions. While an agreement is possible, German EU ambassador Michael Clauss insists London will have to show "a more realistic approach" to reach one by the end of the year. It was not possible for Britain to have "full sovereignty and at the same time full access to the EU's internal market," Clauss told a panel at the European Policy Centre think tank. The EU and Britain are holding a fourth round of virtual talks on their future relations following the UK's split from the bloc after 40 years of membership. Britain left the European Union on January 31 and is now in a transition period until the end of the year during which it enjoys the benefits of EU membership. A meeting is planned for later in June between Prime Minister Boris Johnson, EU Council President Charles Michel and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to take stock of the situation. Clauss said that the EU was working on the assumption that Britain would "not demand an extension" of the transition period beyond the end of the year. Also see: Chief characters in Britain's years-long Brexit saga Both sides are working towards establishing zero-tariff trade ties, but neither side have budged from their red lines. Turning to other subjects, Clauss said a deal to establish a 750 billion euro recovery fund for Europe was possible this summer, but would be difficult. Germany takes over the EU's six-month rotating presidency on July 1 and will be key to finding consensus among the 27 member states to approve the rescue plan. Also read: After years of arguments, British MPs set to finally seal Brexit deal EU leaders are to hold a virtual meeting on June 19 to advance on the matter, but a European official on Wednesday said a deal would require a face-to-face summit, hopefully in July.

Germany asks UK for 'more realistic' approach in Brexit talks

Within a month of taking charge as UK's Finance Minister, Rishi Sunak has presented a Budget which is winning him praises across party lines. Here's a report on the rise of this Indian-origin lawmaker in Britain.

Gravitas: Indian origin Minister presents UK's 1st post Brexit Budget

To curb climate change, the United Kingdom is going to introduce new regulations regarding products which are bought, used briefly, then thrown away in dustbins.

It is&nbsp;part of a worldwide movement called the 'Right to Repair', which has lead to a surge in citizens' repair workshops in several UK cities.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/climate-change-global-warming-may-hit-indias-gdp-within-a-decade-report-285348">Climate change, global warming may hit India’s GDP within a decade: Report</a>

The new rules can spell the death of this common habit often referred to as the ''throwaway culture''.

It will apply to a range of items used on a regular basis such as mobile phones, textiles, electronics, batteries, construction and packaging.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science-tech/nearly-half-of-worlds-beaches-disappearing-due-to-climate-change-study-283976">Nearly half of world's beaches disappearing due to climate change: Study</a>

Proposals aim at making environmentally-friendly products the norm and to inculcate the habit of repairing items in case they malfunction or get damaged.

The plan is being presented by the European Commission is likely to create standards for the UK as well, despite Brexit.

The rules will also fight what is known as "premature obsolescence", the syndrome in which manufacturers make goods with deliberately low lifespan to force consumers into buying a newer model.

Recommendations under the proposal include increasing recycled content in products as well as reducing the impact of products on the climate and environment as well.

To curb climate change, the United Kingdom is going to introduce new regulations regarding products which are bought, used briefly, then thrown away in dustbins.

To curb climate change, the United Kingdom is going to introduce new regulations regarding products which are bought, used briefly, then thrown away in dustbins. It is part of a worldwide movement called the 'Right to Repair', which has lead to a surge in citizens' repair workshops in several UK cities. Also read: Climate change, global warming may hit India’s GDP within a decade: Report The new rules can spell the death of this common habit often referred to as the ''throwaway culture''. It will apply to a range of items used on a regular basis such as mobile phones, textiles, electronics, batteries, construction and packaging. Also read: Nearly half of world's beaches disappearing due to climate change: Study Proposals aim at making environmentally-friendly products the norm and to inculcate the habit of repairing items in case they malfunction or get damaged. The plan is being presented by the European Commission is likely to create standards for the UK as well, despite Brexit. The rules will also fight what is known as "premature obsolescence", the syndrome in which manufacturers make goods with deliberately low lifespan to force consumers into buying a newer model. Recommendations under the proposal include increasing recycled content in products as well as reducing the impact of products on the climate and environment as well.

Climate change: New rules can put an end to 'throwaway culture'

After Brexit, the United Kindom passport will return to its iconic blue colour but the images of the new passport by the Home Office has caused confusion.

WION Dispatch: The new UK Passport is blue or black?

Following Britain's departure from the European Union (EU), the images of the UK's new blue colour passport has created a new controversy.&nbsp;

The Home Office earlier released pictures of the new passport, describing it as a return to the "iconic blue", however, several experts and Twitterati say that the colour is closer to black than blue.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-passport-to-return-to-iconic-blue-colour-284289">UK passport to return to iconic blue colour</a>

Stephen Westland, professor of colour science and technology at the University of Leeds said that when most people would look at the passport, they would call it black, reported BBC.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
There is some right Emperors New Clothes going on with this 'blue' passport that actually looks black <a href="https://t.co/Nb4eRJkz0I">https://t.co/Nb4eRJkz0I</a>
— Smith (@AnotherSmith909) <a href="https://twitter.com/AnotherSmith909/status/1234438772076371969?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Netizens shared interesting memes that took a dig on the passport's colour.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Checking out my “iconic” new blue passport <a href="https://t.co/L2dRftXePT">pic.twitter.com/L2dRftXePT</a>
— Nick Taylor (@Nick_Tea) <a href="https://twitter.com/Nick_Tea/status/1234606820733394944?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
This is like that dress thing again. 
 
When we had the passports before they were black. And now they're black again. We've literally never had blue passports! 
 
Can someone let me in on the bizarre naming convention? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BluePassport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BluePassport</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NotBluePassport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NotBluePassport</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BlackPassport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BlackPassport</a> <a href="https://t.co/6IZ6XDJPyO">pic.twitter.com/6IZ6XDJPyO</a>
— Michael Birtwhistle (@SalfordMH) <a href="https://twitter.com/SalfordMH/status/1234451906052882433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

The UK's passport was of dark blue in colour during the pre-EU days and the passport with the new colour will be made by a Franco-Dutch firm.&nbsp;

"By returning to the iconic blue and gold design, the British passport will once again be entwined with our national identity and I cannot wait to travel on one,” Home Secretary (interior minister) Priti Patel had earlier said in a statement.

From early March, the new passport will be phased and from mid-2020, all new passports will be with the blue colour.&nbsp; 
&nbsp;

Following Britain's departure from the European Union (EU), the images of the UK's new blue colour passport has created a new controversy. The Home Office earlier released pictures of the new passport, describing it as a return to the "iconic blue", however, several experts and Twitterati say that the colour is closer to black than blue.

Following Britain's departure from the European Union (EU), the images of the UK's new blue colour passport has created a new controversy. The Home Office earlier released pictures of the new passport, describing it as a return to the "iconic blue", however, several experts and Twitterati say that the colour is closer to black than blue. Also read: UK passport to return to iconic blue colour Stephen Westland, professor of colour science and technology at the University of Leeds said that when most people would look at the passport, they would call it black, reported BBC. There is some right Emperors New Clothes going on with this 'blue' passport that actually looks black https://t.co/Nb4eRJkz0I — Smith (@AnotherSmith909) March 2, 2020 × Netizens shared interesting memes that took a dig on the passport's colour. Checking out my “iconic” new blue passport pic.twitter.com/L2dRftXePT — Nick Taylor (@Nick_Tea) March 2, 2020 × This is like that dress thing again. When we had the passports before they were black. And now they're black again. We've literally never had blue passports! Can someone let me in on the bizarre naming convention? #BluePassport #NotBluePassport#BlackPassport pic.twitter.com/6IZ6XDJPyO — Michael Birtwhistle (@SalfordMH) March 2, 2020 × The UK's passport was of dark blue in colour during the pre-EU days and the passport with the new colour will be made by a Franco-Dutch firm. "By returning to the iconic blue and gold design, the British passport will once again be entwined with our national identity and I cannot wait to travel on one,” Home Secretary (interior minister) Priti Patel had earlier said in a statement. From early March, the new passport will be phased and from mid-2020, all new passports will be with the blue colour.

Black or Blue? Fresh controversy erupts over new colour of Britain's passport

After Brexit, the UK passport will return to its iconic blue colour. The introduction has already started and from mid-2020, all new passports will be blue.

The first blue passports are being issued this month following the UK’s departure from the European Union.

Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/back-to-blue-uk-passports-revert-to-old-colour-from-next-month-282141"> Back to blue: UK passports revert to old colour from next month</a>

It’s not just the colour that’s different but the design too. The new passport does not have the words "European Union"&nbsp;on the front cover and back cover carries on embossment featuring the floral emblems of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. 
They will be made in France but personalised in the UK.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-starts-issuing-passports-without-european-union-on-cover-208340">UK starts issuing passports without 'European Union' on cover</a>

The UK Home Office said the manufacturing carbon footprint of the passports will be reduced to net zero through projects such as planting trees. And it will carry an updated security feature to keep personal information secure and involve secure printing and design techniques to combat identity theft and forgery.

Also read: Brexit:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/brexit-what-changes-and-what-stays-the-same-for-uk-277885"> What changes and what stays the same for UK?</a>

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel said Brexit has given the UK a unique opportunity to forge a new path in the world and enabled a return to the iconic blue and gold design.

The burgundy passports however are still valid and the passport office is still issuing it&nbsp;for now. But soon, the UK will join 81 countries, including India, the US, Canada, and Australia with its blue passports.

After Brexit, the UK passport will return to its iconic blue colour. The introduction has already started and from mid-2020, all new passports will be blue. The first blue passports are being issued this month following the UK’s departure from the European Union.

After Brexit, the UK passport will return to its iconic blue colour. The introduction has already started and from mid-2020, all new passports will be blue. The first blue passports are being issued this month following the UK’s departure from the European Union. Also read: Back to blue: UK passports revert to old colour from next month It’s not just the colour that’s different but the design too. The new passport does not have the words "European Union" on the front cover and back cover carries on embossment featuring the floral emblems of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. They will be made in France but personalised in the UK. Also read: UK starts issuing passports without 'European Union' on cover The UK Home Office said the manufacturing carbon footprint of the passports will be reduced to net zero through projects such as planting trees. And it will carry an updated security feature to keep personal information secure and involve secure printing and design techniques to combat identity theft and forgery. Also read: Brexit: What changes and what stays the same for UK? UK Home Secretary Priti Patel said Brexit has given the UK a unique opportunity to forge a new path in the world and enabled a return to the iconic blue and gold design. The burgundy passports however are still valid and the passport office is still issuing it for now. But soon, the UK will join 81 countries, including India, the US, Canada, and Australia with its blue passports.

UK passport to return to iconic blue colour

After Brexit, the United Kindom passport will return to its iconic blue colour. Watch WION's report on the story.

Your Story: UK passport switches from burgundy to blue

After Bretix, the UK passport will return to its iconic blue colour. The introduction has already been started and from mid-2020, all new passports will be Blue. 
The first Blue passports are being issued this month following the U.K.’s departure from the European Union.

Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/back-to-blue-uk-passports-revert-to-old-colour-from-next-month-282141"> Back to blue: UK passports revert to old colour from next month</a>

It’s not just the colour that’s different but the design too. The new passport does not have the words European Union on the front cover and back cover carries on embossment featuring the floral emblems of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. 
They will be made in France but personalised in the UK.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-starts-issuing-passports-without-european-union-on-cover-208340">UK starts issuing passports without 'European Union' on cover</a>

The Home Office said the manufacturing carbon footprint of the passports will be reduced to net zero through projects such as planting trees. And it will carry an updated security feature to keep personal information secure and involve secure printing and design techniques to combat identity theft and forgery.

Also read: Brexit:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/brexit-what-changes-and-what-stays-the-same-for-uk-277885"> What changes and what stays the same for UK?</a>

Home Secretary Priti Patel said Brexit has given the UK a unique opportunity to forge a new path in the world and enabled a return to the iconic blue and gold design.

Burgundy passports still in date are still valid and the passport office is still issuing burgundy passports for now. But soon, the UK will join 81 countries, including India, the US, Canada, and Australia with its blue passports. 
Anila Chowdhry, Wion News.

&nbsp;

After Bretix, the UK passport will return to its iconic blue colour. The introduction has already been started and from mid-2020, all new passports will be Blue.

After Bretix, the UK passport will return to its iconic blue colour. The introduction has already been started and from mid-2020, all new passports will be Blue. The first Blue passports are being issued this month following the U.K.’s departure from the European Union. Also read: Back to blue: UK passports revert to old colour from next month It’s not just the colour that’s different but the design too. The new passport does not have the words European Union on the front cover and back cover carries on embossment featuring the floral emblems of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. They will be made in France but personalised in the UK. Also read: UK starts issuing passports without 'European Union' on cover The Home Office said the manufacturing carbon footprint of the passports will be reduced to net zero through projects such as planting trees. And it will carry an updated security feature to keep personal information secure and involve secure printing and design techniques to combat identity theft and forgery. Also read: Brexit: What changes and what stays the same for UK? Home Secretary Priti Patel said Brexit has given the UK a unique opportunity to forge a new path in the world and enabled a return to the iconic blue and gold design. Burgundy passports still in date are still valid and the passport office is still issuing burgundy passports for now. But soon, the UK will join 81 countries, including India, the US, Canada, and Australia with its blue passports. Anila Chowdhry, Wion News.

UK passport will return to it's iconic Blue colour

Britain warned Thursday it would not commit to following <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-uk-eu-allows-huawei-5g-with-strict-guidelines-277407">European Union</a> (EU) rules in a post-<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-uk-eu-allows-huawei-5g-with-strict-guidelines-277407">Brexit </a>trade deal, and threatened to abandon talks in June if no compromise was possible.

Two days after EU ministers approved their own joint approach to the negotiations, which start on Monday, Prime Minister <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-uk-eu-allows-huawei-5g-with-strict-guidelines-277407">Boris Johnson</a>'s government set out its own red lines.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/canada-uk-free-trade-a-post-brexit-opportunity-279098">Canada-UK free trade: A post-Brexit opportunity</a>

The formal negotiating mandate says London wants to agree a relationship "based on friendly cooperation between sovereign equals" before the end of the post-Brexit transition period on December 31.

But it warns: "We will not agree to any obligations for our laws to be aligned with the EU's or for the EU's institutions including the Court of Justice, to have any jurisdiction in the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-uk-eu-allows-huawei-5g-with-strict-guidelines-277407">UK</a>."

The document also states that if both sides have not been able to reach a "broad outline of an agreement" by June, then it would have to decide whether to walk away from the talks.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-uk-eu-allows-huawei-5g-with-strict-guidelines-277407">After UK, EU allows Huawei 5G with strict guidelines</a>

When Britain left the European Union on January 31, both sides agreed a standstill period while they establish a new partnership to replace 47 years of political and economic integration.

London has the option to extend the transition beyond the end of 2020 but says it will not.

So in June, it would decide "whether the UK's attention should move away from negotiations and focus solely on continuing domestic preparations to exit the transition period in an orderly fashion".

Failure to reach a new agreement with the EU -- Britain's largest trading partner -- is likely to be hugely disruptive on both sides of the Channel.

Britain warned Thursday it would not commit to following European Union (EU) rules in a post-Brexit trade deal, and threatened to abandon talks in June if no compromise was possible.

Britain warned Thursday it would not commit to following European Union (EU) rules in a post-Brexit trade deal, and threatened to abandon talks in June if no compromise was possible. Two days after EU ministers approved their own joint approach to the negotiations, which start on Monday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government set out its own red lines. Also read: Canada-UK free trade: A post-Brexit opportunity The formal negotiating mandate says London wants to agree a relationship "based on friendly cooperation between sovereign equals" before the end of the post-Brexit transition period on December 31. But it warns: "We will not agree to any obligations for our laws to be aligned with the EU's or for the EU's institutions including the Court of Justice, to have any jurisdiction in the UK." The document also states that if both sides have not been able to reach a "broad outline of an agreement" by June, then it would have to decide whether to walk away from the talks. Also read: After UK, EU allows Huawei 5G with strict guidelines When Britain left the European Union on January 31, both sides agreed a standstill period while they establish a new partnership to replace 47 years of political and economic integration. London has the option to extend the transition beyond the end of 2020 but says it will not. So in June, it would decide "whether the UK's attention should move away from negotiations and focus solely on continuing domestic preparations to exit the transition period in an orderly fashion". Failure to reach a new agreement with the EU -- Britain's largest trading partner -- is likely to be hugely disruptive on both sides of the Channel.

United Kingdom rejects European Union trade demands, threatens to walk away

Amidst the backdrop of potentially long drawn out and convoluted negotiations between Britain and the EU over the nature and form of the former's relationship with the latter is lost a fundamental and even primaeval question: Can Britain have a foreign policy? The question assumes salience against the backdrop of an election that has perhaps moved past the fractiousness of the Brexit debate and its mechanics thereof. With the people’s will aggregated mostly on one party and its political philosophy for an assorted set of reasons, it is perhaps now time to also focus or more accurately focus on Britain’s relationship with the world and the country’s role in it.

There are basically two approaches that Britain can take: A more of the same one that would entail and mean what Gideon Rachman has called 'social work' and whose content is foreign aid coupled with a recalibration of the foreign service. The second, a more pragmatic one, would or could be to shake and dust off the vestiges of the ‘imperialist’ label and assert itself internationally. (Assertion here is not the same as imperial(ist)- a label that is oftentimes employed to hold down a state or society by inducing guilt).

It is essentially about power and its use. In this day and age, while it amounts to sating a cliché, the nature and form of power has changed. It is not that power- a contested concept- and its use have become mushy or sentimental. No. Not at all. It is that power, in all its dimensions, its form has come to incorporate and integrate both its ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ nature - a combination or synthesis that Joseph Nye, a Harvard academic termed ‘smart power'. It is this smart power that Britain must develop, cultivate and employ.

What, the question is, would a ‘smart power’ approach look for Britain?

First and foremost, Britain must shake off its abashedness about power and its employment. This shyness and coyness about power stem from Britain’s past, which is over. The legacy of the past must not be allowed to override the present and the future. &nbsp;The country must, to iterate another cliché, live in a future-oriented present while also living in the present. This has implications for how Britain thinks of, conceives and employs power. To make a digression here, in the final analysis, nation-states’ ultimate quest is for and of power and security. This is a cardinal axiom in the world of states that even a post-modern vision or version of politics might find difficult to argue. If this axiom holds, then Britain with its coyness of and about power will find itself overtaken substantially by others in the power game. It is then in the nature of an imperative for Britain to stay relevant or even ahead in the power game.

But, power is not merely about the number of missiles you have, or how quickly and effectively you can mobilise your army or war preparedness. It is all of the above and more: Power, in this day and age, is also, to paraphrase Joseph Nye is about agenda-setting. But agenda setting is a corollary of influence. And, Britain has, not only a diminished power capability in terms of hard power but also diminished influence. Does this mean that the country is destined or doomed to remain diminished in these areas and thus gradually lose relevance in and at the global stage?

No is the answer. Britain has huge reservoirs of influence embedded in the sinews of its social and economic structures plus institutions and as the defying of the doomsayers, economic prognostications about the impact of Brexit negotiations on the wider economy suggest, an inbuilt resilience to it. It is in the interstices of the two that Britain can reclaim and develop its smart power. For Britain then, the causality of power would be reversed; it can and must develop its power from the influence which stems from its institutions- &nbsp;its universities, &nbsp;its reasonably robust legal and judicial system, and generally tolerant society where people, in the main, feel home and so on.

In a world where other states, in the hard dimensions of power, are rapidly catching up, influence then becomes a key and vital element toward power. Within a balance of power setting, countering power with power can only generate frisson and friction but influence can lead to real power in these contexts: that of agenda-setting. It is this agenda-setting, power and influence, thereof that Britain must develop - an arena that is eminently possible and achievable for a middle power country – especially against the backdrop of the reservoirs of soft power Britain has: it's attractive and robust university system that offer diverse students all over the world pathways to better careers, the use of English as a global lingua franca, education and career development, and the country’s diversity are a natural contender for developing the country’s influence. Among other things, university outputs, systems and the graduates of these institutions become natural conveyors of influence that also allow a given country to radiate outward in a non-offensive and non-jarring manner.

But, while agenda-setting influence is or might be the end game, it is incomplete without the foundational elements of hard power, rendered all the more salient in a world where interstate competition and the imbalances of power are fluid and will get pronounced with the passage of time. Hard power capabilities are best when these hover in the backdrop; that is, when these are not actually used but rendered as instruments of diplomacy and a hedge against bullying and threats by others. And, without these capabilities, influence can only be skin deep. For Britain to develop into a relevant, influential global actor, it not only has to leverage all its potentialities but also develop a smart power strategy that allows it to have a foreign policy. This, given a range of factors and elements, is eminently doable.

(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL) &nbsp;

Amidst the backdrop of potentially long drawn out and convoluted negotiations between Britain and the EU over the nature and form of the former's relationship with the latter is lost a fundamental and even primaeval question: Can Britain have a foreign policy?

Amidst the backdrop of potentially long drawn out and convoluted negotiations between Britain and the EU over the nature and form of the former's relationship with the latter is lost a fundamental and even primaeval question: Can Britain have a foreign policy? The question assumes salience against the backdrop of an election that has perhaps moved past the fractiousness of the Brexit debate and its mechanics thereof. With the people’s will aggregated mostly on one party and its political philosophy for an assorted set of reasons, it is perhaps now time to also focus or more accurately focus on Britain’s relationship with the world and the country’s role in it. There are basically two approaches that Britain can take: A more of the same one that would entail and mean what Gideon Rachman has called 'social work' and whose content is foreign aid coupled with a recalibration of the foreign service. The second, a more pragmatic one, would or could be to shake and dust off the vestiges of the ‘imperialist’ label and assert itself internationally. (Assertion here is not the same as imperial(ist)- a label that is oftentimes employed to hold down a state or society by inducing guilt). It is essentially about power and its use. In this day and age, while it amounts to sating a cliché, the nature and form of power has changed. It is not that power- a contested concept- and its use have become mushy or sentimental. No. Not at all. It is that power, in all its dimensions, its form has come to incorporate and integrate both its ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ nature - a combination or synthesis that Joseph Nye, a Harvard academic termed ‘smart power'. It is this smart power that Britain must develop, cultivate and employ. What, the question is, would a ‘smart power’ approach look for Britain? First and foremost, Britain must shake off its abashedness about power and its employment. This shyness and coyness about power stem from Britain’s past, which is over. The legacy of the past must not be allowed to override the present and the future. The country must, to iterate another cliché, live in a future-oriented present while also living in the present. This has implications for how Britain thinks of, conceives and employs power. To make a digression here, in the final analysis, nation-states’ ultimate quest is for and of power and security. This is a cardinal axiom in the world of states that even a post-modern vision or version of politics might find difficult to argue. If this axiom holds, then Britain with its coyness of and about power will find itself overtaken substantially by others in the power game. It is then in the nature of an imperative for Britain to stay relevant or even ahead in the power game. But, power is not merely about the number of missiles you have, or how quickly and effectively you can mobilise your army or war preparedness. It is all of the above and more: Power, in this day and age, is also, to paraphrase Joseph Nye is about agenda-setting. But agenda setting is a corollary of influence. And, Britain has, not only a diminished power capability in terms of hard power but also diminished influence. Does this mean that the country is destined or doomed to remain diminished in these areas and thus gradually lose relevance in and at the global stage? No is the answer. Britain has huge reservoirs of influence embedded in the sinews of its social and economic structures plus institutions and as the defying of the doomsayers, economic prognostications about the impact of Brexit negotiations on the wider economy suggest, an inbuilt resilience to it. It is in the interstices of the two that Britain can reclaim and develop its smart power. For Britain then, the causality of power would be reversed; it can and must develop its power from the influence which stems from its institutions- its universities, its reasonably robust legal and judicial system, and generally tolerant society where people, in the main, feel home and so on. In a world where other states, in the hard dimensions of power, are rapidly catching up, influence then becomes a key and vital element toward power. Within a balance of power setting, countering power with power can only generate frisson and friction but influence can lead to real power in these contexts: that of agenda-setting. It is this agenda-setting, power and influence, thereof that Britain must develop - an arena that is eminently possible and achievable for a middle power country – especially against the backdrop of the reservoirs of soft power Britain has: it's attractive and robust university system that offer diverse students all over the world pathways to better careers, the use of English as a global lingua franca, education and career development, and the country’s diversity are a natural contender for developing the country’s influence. Among other things, university outputs, systems and the graduates of these institutions become natural conveyors of influence that also allow a given country to radiate outward in a non-offensive and non-jarring manner. But, while agenda-setting influence is or might be the end game, it is incomplete without the foundational elements of hard power, rendered all the more salient in a world where interstate competition and the imbalances of power are fluid and will get pronounced with the passage of time. Hard power capabilities are best when these hover in the backdrop; that is, when these are not actually used but rendered as instruments of diplomacy and a hedge against bullying and threats by others. And, without these capabilities, influence can only be skin deep. For Britain to develop into a relevant, influential global actor, it not only has to leverage all its potentialities but also develop a smart power strategy that allows it to have a foreign policy. This, given a range of factors and elements, is eminently doable. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL)

How Britain can shape its foreign policy?

Post Brexit UK changed its immigration laws. The UK adopted a point-based merit system for the migrant workers, but 70% of EU workers will not meet new UK immigration criteria. The question is will India be benefited from the new immigration laws?

WION Dispatch: UK's new points-based visa system will benefit Indians?

Britain's government on Wednesday faced a backlash over its new post-Brexit immigration plans, which are designed to cut "cheap Labour from Europe" in favour of high-skilled English speakers.

Britain's government on Wednesday faced a backlash over its new post-Brexit immigration plans, which are designed to cut "cheap Labour from Europe" in favour of high-skilled English speakers. The points-based system is due to start on January 1, 2021, and was billed as "taking back control" of Britain's borders - a key demand of anti-EU campaigners in the divisive Brexit debate. Interior minister Priti Patel called the sweeping reforms "firm and fair" and said it would make it easier for higher-skilled workers to get visas, and harder for low-skilled migrants to do so. "We need to shift the focus of our economy away from a reliance on cheap labour from Europe and instead concentrate on investment in technology and automation," she said. The plans are the biggest change to immigration policy in 50 years and will go before parliament, where Prime Minister Boris Johnson has a comfortable majority. But the Conservative government was accused of failing to assess the impact of the reforms on the economy, while businesses heavily reliant on foreign labour questioned the feasibility of the policy. Also Read: Sovereignty comes first: Britain lays out tough stance for EU trade talks The main opposition Labour party said some sectors' reliance on foreign workers would force the government to make numerous exceptions, rendering the new rules "meaningless". the Party's spokesperson Diana Abbott called it a "salary threshold system", which would hit the already hard-pressed state-run National Health Service and social care sector. "If they are all short-term visas, only the most desperate workers will come, and will have the effect of creating a two-tier workforce," Abbott said. Her opposite number at the smaller Liberal Democrats said the policy was "based on xenophobia, not the social and economic needs of our country". "Too many businesses are already struggling to hire the workers they need. Now the Tories want to stop them from recruiting all but the highest-paid employees from abroad," said Christine Jardine. Britain left the EU after 47 years of membership on January 31. EU rules are still in place until the end of the year as London and Brussels thrash out a new trade deal. But Jardine and others warned that 10 months was not enough time for businesses to prepare for the end to the free movement of EU nationals to other member states. They warned of potential staff shortages, as well as chaos and confusion through additional red tape. Reduce immigration The plans do not affect more than 3.2 million EU citizens who have applied to stay in Britain under the official settlement scheme. The proposals require each foreign worker to earn 70 points to be eligible and a set number of points for each qualification or skill. A maximum of 20 points is awarded for prospective migrants who will earn at least £25,600 ($33,325 or 30,820 euros) and no points for those who will make the required minimum of £20,480. Twenty points also go to people with an "appropriate skill level" and another 20 for those who speak English "at the required level". Britain's current salary threshold for skilled migrants is £30,000. People who have jobs "in a shortage qualification" will also earn 20 points and either 10 or 20 points for doctorate degrees in various fields. "Applicants will be able to 'trade' characteristics such as their specific job offer and qualifications against a lower salary," the government proposal says. Overall, the government said the aim is to "reduce overall migration numbers" - another demand of Brexit supporters - but did not give a figure on the expected fall. The Migration Advisory Committee said last month the end to freedom of movement could have "zero effect" on providing more jobs for British workers. The move comes after concern about the impact of Brexit on the high numbers of foreign nurses, and lower-paid overseas support workers and care assistants in the health and social care. The Food and Drink Federation, National Farmers Union and UK Hospitality said they were worried about shortages of workers as they relied on temporary low-skilled migrants.

UK's new immigration plan designed to cut 'cheap Labour from Europe' sparks criticism

Brexit is a "game-changer" that could trigger a referendum on Irish unification within three years, the leader of the nationalist Sinn Finn party said on Saturday.

"This isn't a one-off event, this is a game-changer," Mary Lou McDonald told the Times newspaper.

"I think we have to prepare and I think London has to prepare" for the possibility of a referendum, adding that five years was a realistic timeframe, but that "it could happen in three years."

Her party, whose central policy is to take Northern Ireland out of British control, is flying high having won the popular vote in last week's general election.

"I am absolutely sure we were elected on a mandate to be in government," she told the Times, as talks to form an executive continued. "This wasn't a protest vote."

The party's journey from political pariah connected to republican terrorism to mainstream confirmed that Ireland was moving towards a reunification vote, she said.

"Irish unity now is discussed across the island in a way that I never recall in my lifetime," she told the British broadsheet.

"If you look northwards, the unionist majority has gone. There has been a generational turning of the wheel."

Britain's departure from the European Union, which was opposed in Northern Ireland, has "accelerated not just the conversation but the immediacy of recognising our collective needs and protecting ourselves," she added.

McDonald claimed the Brexit vote was driven by "the lowest common denominator of English nationalism", and that Ireland should "start making the preparations" for its own referendum.

Sinn Fein's bid to form a new government appeared to stall on Thursday after the leader of the centrist party it has been holding talks with said they had "irreconcilable differences".

With its 37 seats, the left-wing party long tarnished by past associations with nationalist paramilitaries broke the country's stranglehold of two-party politics.

London is already under pressure from Scottish nationalists, who want a new referendum on independence.

Brexit is a "game-changer" that could trigger a referendum on Irish unification within three years, the leader of the nationalist Sinn Finn party said on Saturday.

Brexit is a "game-changer" that could trigger a referendum on Irish unification within three years, the leader of the nationalist Sinn Finn party said on Saturday. "This isn't a one-off event, this is a game-changer," Mary Lou McDonald told the Times newspaper. "I think we have to prepare and I think London has to prepare" for the possibility of a referendum, adding that five years was a realistic timeframe, but that "it could happen in three years." Her party, whose central policy is to take Northern Ireland out of British control, is flying high having won the popular vote in last week's general election. "I am absolutely sure we were elected on a mandate to be in government," she told the Times, as talks to form an executive continued. "This wasn't a protest vote." The party's journey from political pariah connected to republican terrorism to mainstream confirmed that Ireland was moving towards a reunification vote, she said. "Irish unity now is discussed across the island in a way that I never recall in my lifetime," she told the British broadsheet. "If you look northwards, the unionist majority has gone. There has been a generational turning of the wheel." Britain's departure from the European Union, which was opposed in Northern Ireland, has "accelerated not just the conversation but the immediacy of recognising our collective needs and protecting ourselves," she added. McDonald claimed the Brexit vote was driven by "the lowest common denominator of English nationalism", and that Ireland should "start making the preparations" for its own referendum. Sinn Fein's bid to form a new government appeared to stall on Thursday after the leader of the centrist party it has been holding talks with said they had "irreconcilable differences". With its 37 seats, the left-wing party long tarnished by past associations with nationalist paramilitaries broke the country's stranglehold of two-party politics. London is already under pressure from Scottish nationalists, who want a new referendum on independence.

Irish republican leader sees unity vote in 3-5 years

The British government is in "preliminary discussions" with the part state-owned China Railway Construction Corporation (CRCC) to help build the controversial HS2 high-speed link, according to the Department of Transport.

"The DfT is always keen to learn from the experience of others and to consider approaches that offer value for money to the taxpayer," said a ministry official, confirming reports in Saturday's Financial Times.

The department added that no "concrete commitments" had been made.

London finally approved the new high-speed railway line on Tuesday, with full construction work to begin in April following years of delays, after Prime Minister Boris Johnson backed the project.

He said the entire HS2 line linking London to central and northern England would go ahead, rejecting criticism of a ballooning price tag and impact on the environment.

"If we start now, services could be running by the end of the decade. So today... the cabinet has given high-speed rail the green signal," he told the House of Commons.

The CCRC wrote to rail chiefs last month in a letter seen by Building Magazine saying it could construct the line five years earlier than scheduled for a much-reduced price.

"We are certain that we can offer a cost that is significantly lower than the projections we have seen," the magazine quoted the letter as saying.

"The advantages are too great, in our opinion, too great to dismiss on the basis that there are obstacles to overcome.

"You will find that the Chinese way is to seek solutions, not linger on obstacles and difficulties," it added.

An independent review into the scheme, currently the largest infrastructure project in Europe, estimated it could cost more than £100 billion ($129 billion, 118 billion euros).

But Johnson hopes HS2 would help rebalance the economy away from London and the south-east of England and reduce climate emissions by persuading car drivers to take the train.

Chinese involvement in a key infrastructure project would be hugely controversial, given the furore surrounding Britain's decision to allow telecoms giant Huawei into the country's 5G network.

The decision left the United States "disappointed" after it called for a total ban.

The British government is in "preliminary discussions" with the part state-owned China Railway Construction Corporation (CRCC) to help build the controversial HS2 high-speed link, according to the Department of Transport.

The British government is in "preliminary discussions" with the part state-owned China Railway Construction Corporation (CRCC) to help build the controversial HS2 high-speed link, according to the Department of Transport. "The DfT is always keen to learn from the experience of others and to consider approaches that offer value for money to the taxpayer," said a ministry official, confirming reports in Saturday's Financial Times. The department added that no "concrete commitments" had been made. London finally approved the new high-speed railway line on Tuesday, with full construction work to begin in April following years of delays, after Prime Minister Boris Johnson backed the project. He said the entire HS2 line linking London to central and northern England would go ahead, rejecting criticism of a ballooning price tag and impact on the environment. "If we start now, services could be running by the end of the decade. So today... the cabinet has given high-speed rail the green signal," he told the House of Commons. The CCRC wrote to rail chiefs last month in a letter seen by Building Magazine saying it could construct the line five years earlier than scheduled for a much-reduced price. "We are certain that we can offer a cost that is significantly lower than the projections we have seen," the magazine quoted the letter as saying. "The advantages are too great, in our opinion, too great to dismiss on the basis that there are obstacles to overcome. "You will find that the Chinese way is to seek solutions, not linger on obstacles and difficulties," it added. An independent review into the scheme, currently the largest infrastructure project in Europe, estimated it could cost more than £100 billion ($129 billion, 118 billion euros). But Johnson hopes HS2 would help rebalance the economy away from London and the south-east of England and reduce climate emissions by persuading car drivers to take the train. Chinese involvement in a key infrastructure project would be hugely controversial, given the furore surrounding Britain's decision to allow telecoms giant Huawei into the country's 5G network. The decision left the United States "disappointed" after it called for a total ban.

UK in talks with Chinese rail firm over high-speed line

Indian-origin politician <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/british-finance-minister-sajid-javid-quits-in-reshuffle-280549">Rishi Sunak replaced Sajid Javi</a>d as Finance Minister of the United Kingdom on Thursday. He was appointed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson in the cabinet reshuffle.

Sunak, the son-in-law of Infosys Co-founder and Indian billionaire&nbsp;Narayana Murthy, will join Home secretary Priti Patel on the top government bench as the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Before this, Sunak has served as Javid's junior as the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. He was seen as a rising star within the Cabinet while he working with Javid.

As he takes charge of the second most important government position in UK, Sunak will move into No. 11 Downing Street, next door to the Prime Minister's Office.

The MP for Richmond in Yorkshire first entered the UK Parliament in 2015 and has fast risen up the Conservative Party ranks as a staunch Brexiteer who had back Johnson's strategy to leave the European Union (EU).&nbsp;

Sunak was regularly put forward by the government to do media interviews and stood in for Johnson in some televised debates during last year's election campaign.

Born in the UK,&nbsp;Sunak's mother was a pharmacist who ran a local pharmacy shop while his father was a National Health Service (NHS) general practitioner.&nbsp;

Sunak&nbsp;attended the prestigious Winchester College before going on to study Politics, Philosophy and Economics at Oxford University. He also has an MBA from Stanford University in the United States.

&nbsp;Before entering politics he worked for investment bank Goldman Sachs and a hedge fund, then co-founded a 1-billion pound global investment firm.&nbsp;

"From working in my mum's tiny chemist shop to my experience building large businesses, I have seen how we should support free enterprise and innovation to ensure Britain has a stronger future," Sunak had said during the Brexit referendum.

He strongly believes that small businesses in the UK would flourish as a result of Brexit as the "vast majority of British businesses (94 per cent) don't have anything to do with the EU, but they are still subject to all EU law".

(With inputs from agencies)

Indian-origin politician Rishi Sunak replaced Sajid Javid as Finance Minister of the United Kingdom on Thursday. He was appointed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson in the cabinet reshuffle.

Indian-origin politician Rishi Sunak replaced Sajid Javid as Finance Minister of the United Kingdom on Thursday. He was appointed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson in the cabinet reshuffle. Sunak, the son-in-law of Infosys Co-founder and Indian billionaire Narayana Murthy, will join Home secretary Priti Patel on the top government bench as the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Before this, Sunak has served as Javid's junior as the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. He was seen as a rising star within the Cabinet while he working with Javid. As he takes charge of the second most important government position in UK, Sunak will move into No. 11 Downing Street, next door to the Prime Minister's Office. The MP for Richmond in Yorkshire first entered the UK Parliament in 2015 and has fast risen up the Conservative Party ranks as a staunch Brexiteer who had back Johnson's strategy to leave the European Union (EU). Sunak was regularly put forward by the government to do media interviews and stood in for Johnson in some televised debates during last year's election campaign. Born in the UK, Sunak's mother was a pharmacist who ran a local pharmacy shop while his father was a National Health Service (NHS) general practitioner. Sunak attended the prestigious Winchester College before going on to study Politics, Philosophy and Economics at Oxford University. He also has an MBA from Stanford University in the United States. Before entering politics he worked for investment bank Goldman Sachs and a hedge fund, then co-founded a 1-billion pound global investment firm. "From working in my mum's tiny chemist shop to my experience building large businesses, I have seen how we should support free enterprise and innovation to ensure Britain has a stronger future," Sunak had said during the Brexit referendum. He strongly believes that small businesses in the UK would flourish as a result of Brexit as the "vast majority of British businesses (94 per cent) don't have anything to do with the EU, but they are still subject to all EU law". (With inputs from agencies)

From working in chemist shop to becoming UK's new finance minister - Who is Rishi Sunak?

brexit-0

Brexit, News on Brexit, stories on Brexit, articles on Brexit, Brexit stories at Wion, Brexit news, Brexit latest news

brexit 0