Anthropic has signed a large-scale agreement to purchase computing capacity from xAI, in a deal that could reshape how artificial intelligence companies access infrastructure.&nbsp;Under the agreement, Anthropic will pay around $1.25 billion per month for compute resources until May 2029. The total value of the deal could exceed $40 billion, according to filings referenced in reports.&nbsp;<h2>What the deal includes</h2>The agreement gives Anthropic access to around 300 megawatts of compute capacity, covering the full output of a large data centre known as Colossus 1, located in Tennessee in the United States. This scale of computing power is required to train and run advanced AI models. As models become more complex, companies need larger infrastructure to support them.&nbsp;The contract includes a discounted rate for the initial months and allows either side to terminate the agreement with 90 days’ notice.<h2>Why compute has become critical in AI</h2>In artificial intelligence, computing power is now one of the most important resources. Training large AI models requires thousands of specialised chips and significant energy. Industry experts note that access to compute has become a key competitive factor. Companies that secure large-scale infrastructure can develop and deploy models more quickly.This has led to increasing investments in data centres and long-term compute contracts.<h2>xAI’s dual business strategy</h2>The deal highlights a shift in xAI’s approach. Instead of using all its infrastructure internally, the company is now offering unused capacity to other firms. This model, sometimes described as a “neocloud”, allows companies to act both as AI developers and infrastructure providers.According to filings, this strategy helps xAI generate revenue from its existing infrastructure while continuing its own AI development.<h2>Possible reasons behind the agreement</h2>Reports suggest that xAI may have built more compute capacity than it currently needs. With demand for its own AI products fluctuating, selling excess capacity provides a way to recover costs.At the same time, Anthropic benefits by gaining immediate access to large-scale infrastructure without building new data centres. This creates a mutually beneficial arrangement, where one company supplies infrastructure and the other uses it to expand its AI capabilities.<h2>Impact on the AI industry</h2>The deal reflects a broader trend where AI companies are entering long-term agreements for computing power. It also shows how the industry is evolving beyond software into infrastructure-heavy operations. Competition is no longer limited to models and algorithms. It now includes access to hardware, energy and data centre capacity.<h2>What this means going forward</h2>As AI systems continue to grow in size and complexity, demand for compute is expected to increase further. More companies may adopt similar partnerships to secure reliable infrastructure. The Anthropic-xAI agreement shows how the AI industry is changing, with large-scale investments in computing becoming central to future development&nbsp;&nbsp;

Anthropic has signed a large-scale agreement to purchase computing capacity from xAI, in a deal that could reshape how artificial intelligence companies access infrastructure.

Anthropic has signed a large-scale agreement to purchase computing capacity from xAI, in a deal that could reshape how artificial intelligence companies access infrastructure. Under the agreement, Anthropic will pay around $1.25 billion per month for compute resources until May 2029. The total value of the deal could exceed $40 billion, according to filings referenced in reports. What the deal includes The agreement gives Anthropic access to around 300 megawatts of compute capacity, covering the full output of a large data centre known as Colossus 1, located in Tennessee in the United States. This scale of computing power is required to train and run advanced AI models. As models become more complex, companies need larger infrastructure to support them. The contract includes a discounted rate for the initial months and allows either side to terminate the agreement with 90 days’ notice. Why compute has become critical in AI In artificial intelligence, computing power is now one of the most important resources. Training large AI models requires thousands of specialised chips and significant energy. Industry experts note that access to compute has become a key competitive factor. Companies that secure large-scale infrastructure can develop and deploy models more quickly. This has led to increasing investments in data centres and long-term compute contracts. xAI’s dual business strategy The deal highlights a shift in xAI’s approach. Instead of using all its infrastructure internally, the company is now offering unused capacity to other firms. This model, sometimes described as a “neocloud”, allows companies to act both as AI developers and infrastructure providers. According to filings, this strategy helps xAI generate revenue from its existing infrastructure while continuing its own AI development. Possible reasons behind the agreement Reports suggest that xAI may have built more compute capacity than it currently needs. With demand for its own AI products fluctuating, selling excess capacity provides a way to recover costs. At the same time, Anthropic benefits by gaining immediate access to large-scale infrastructure without building new data centres. This creates a mutually beneficial arrangement, where one company supplies infrastructure and the other uses it to expand its AI capabilities. Impact on the AI industry The deal reflects a broader trend where AI companies are entering long-term agreements for computing power. It also shows how the industry is evolving beyond software into infrastructure-heavy operations. Competition is no longer limited to models and algorithms. It now includes access to hardware, energy and data centre capacity. What this means going forward As AI systems continue to grow in size and complexity, demand for compute is expected to increase further. More companies may adopt similar partnerships to secure reliable infrastructure. The Anthropic-xAI agreement shows how the AI industry is changing, with large-scale investments in computing becoming central to future development

Anthropic has signed a large-scale agreement to purchase computing capacity from xAI, in a deal that could reshape how artificial intelligence companies access infrastructure.

Anthropic to pay $1.25 billion monthly to xAI for compute in major AI infrastructure deal

A place ruled entirely by robots definitely sounds like a scary scenario, but one person seems adamant on making it a reality. He is almost certain that nothing bad will happen, after all, the Cabinet will comprise AI replicas of world leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill, Eleanor Roosevelt, Marcus Aurelius, Nelson Mandela, Leonardo da Vinci, and Sun Tzu. However, experts fear that it could lead to dangerous and expensive mistakes. Sensay is a tiny 3.6km island in the Philippines located in the Palawan archipelago. It is owned by Dan Thomson, who runs an AI chatbot company. He dreams of establishing a micronation on his island, governed by a council of 17 AI-powered robots modelled after the powerful leaders. They think, deliberate decisions, and argue just like them. They can even incorporate proposals and votes from them. Getting the best minds together might be the perfect way to ensure smooth governance; however, critics and Thomson know that everything could go wrong.&nbsp;AI has already been flagged as a potential risk to humanity if it evolves in ways that are not beneficial to us. On Sensay, we might get to see that happening first-hand. The rule of AI with no human intervention could be a recipe for disaster. Currently, it relies on human proxies and manually implements its choices. But Thomson's future plan is to connect the AI council to independent banking cards and crypto wallets. It would hire and pay workers in the real world, and everything could go wrong from here. Talking about an extreme scenario with CNN, he said, "If it starts acquiring weapons and attacking neighbouring islands, that would be a bad situation." Although Thomson thinks "it's extremely unlikely" to happen. He has placed a 'Human Override Assembly' to counter any threat.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/students-boo-former-google-ceo-for-talking-about-ai-second-incident-in-a-week-there-is-a-fear-1779115474011">Students boo former Google CEO for talking about AI, second incident in a week - ‘There is a fear...’</a><h2>12,000 people have applied to become e-residents</h2>Even though it is simply an experiment at the moment, thousands of people have shown interest in becoming residents. Thomson wants to build up to 30 villas on the island to make it a popular stopover for tourists who visit Palawan each year. He also thinks it could get some permanent residents. At least 12,000 people have applied to become e-residents on the island. He did not expect this to happen, and says it is likely because "so many people have such little faith in their own governments". An e-resident is a digital identity, and those who hold it can access a country's e-services with ease. Right now, only one person, a groundskeeper referred to as a 'guy called Mike' &nbsp;by project communications advisor Emily Keogh, lives here.According to Sensay's website, the full digital e-residency programme will be officially launched in 2027.&nbsp; &nbsp;

AI bots impersonating figures like Gandhi and Churchill could soon rule an island. They will think like them, talk like them, and argue like them. Could they turn into a threat if AI is left to make independent decisions without intervention from humans? 

A place ruled entirely by robots definitely sounds like a scary scenario, but one person seems adamant on making it a reality. He is almost certain that nothing bad will happen, after all, the Cabinet will comprise AI replicas of world leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill, Eleanor Roosevelt, Marcus Aurelius, Nelson Mandela, Leonardo da Vinci, and Sun Tzu. However, experts fear that it could lead to dangerous and expensive mistakes. Sensay is a tiny 3.6km island in the Philippines located in the Palawan archipelago. It is owned by Dan Thomson, who runs an AI chatbot company. He dreams of establishing a micronation on his island, governed by a council of 17 AI-powered robots modelled after the powerful leaders. They think, deliberate decisions, and argue just like them. They can even incorporate proposals and votes from them. Getting the best minds together might be the perfect way to ensure smooth governance; however, critics and Thomson know that everything could go wrong. AI has already been flagged as a potential risk to humanity if it evolves in ways that are not beneficial to us. On Sensay, we might get to see that happening first-hand. The rule of AI with no human intervention could be a recipe for disaster. Currently, it relies on human proxies and manually implements its choices. But Thomson's future plan is to connect the AI council to independent banking cards and crypto wallets. It would hire and pay workers in the real world, and everything could go wrong from here. Talking about an extreme scenario with CNN, he said, "If it starts acquiring weapons and attacking neighbouring islands, that would be a bad situation." Although Thomson thinks "it's extremely unlikely" to happen. He has placed a 'Human Override Assembly' to counter any threat. Also Read: Students boo former Google CEO for talking about AI, second incident in a week - ‘There is a fear...’ 12,000 people have applied to become e-residents Even though it is simply an experiment at the moment, thousands of people have shown interest in becoming residents. Thomson wants to build up to 30 villas on the island to make it a popular stopover for tourists who visit Palawan each year. He also thinks it could get some permanent residents. At least 12,000 people have applied to become e-residents on the island. He did not expect this to happen, and says it is likely because "so many people have such little faith in their own governments". An e-resident is a digital identity, and those who hold it can access a country's e-services with ease. Right now, only one person, a groundskeeper referred to as a 'guy called Mike' by project communications advisor Emily Keogh, lives here. According to Sensay's website, the full digital e-residency programme will be officially launched in 2027.

AI bots impersonating figures like Gandhi and Churchill could soon rule an island. They will think like them, talk like them, and argue like them. Could they turn into a threat if AI is left to make independent decisions without intervention from humans?&nbsp;

Would you like to live on an island RULED by AI? Yes, it exists

Artificial Intelligence has become a hot topic at commencement speeches in America this year, and for exactly what you think. Students have been openly showing their displeasure with AI amid concerns that they are going to be left jobless because of it. CEOs across the world have been pushing for the use of AI, and clearly, students who are stepping into the world are not happy. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was booed when he mentioned AI at the commencement address at the University of Arizona on Sunday. While speaking to as many as 10,000, he hit a nerve when he broached the topic that has left everyone in a tizzy. Schmidt acknowledged that AI could take away the future of those entering the workforce. As soon as he brought it up, students started jeering and booing. "I know what many of you are feeling about that. I can hear you. There is a fear. There is a fear in your generation that the future has already been written, that the machines are coming, that the jobs are evaporating, that the climate is breaking, that politics are fractured, and that you are inheriting a mess that you did not create.”<h2>Gloria Caulfield received booed at University of Central Florida for calling AI next Industrial Revolution</h2>He then told students that they would "help shape artificial intelligence". This is the second time in days that a speaker has received a similar response as soon as the topic of AI was brought up. Both times, it was clearly unplanned. At the University of Central Florida, Gloria Caulfield, a real estate executive, said, "The rise of artificial intelligence is the next Industrial Revolution", and no one in the crowd was happy. Students started booing Gloria, and she was taken aback. “Woop, what happened? OK, I struck a chord." She did not let it stop her from praising AI, as she added, "We’ve got a bipolar topic here, I see. AI capabilities are in the palm of our hands."&nbsp;<h2>Jensen Huang's AI number at Carnegie Mellon</h2>NVIDIA chief Jensen Huang spoke at Carnegie Mellon University recently and stated that AI will be a net positive for humanity and there’s no better time to “begin your life’s work” than now. He said this when companies freeze hirings and firing staff to push AI at workplace. “AI is not likely to replace you, but someone using AI better than you might," he said. While he was not booed for bringing it up, a viral video on social media from before his speech shows a group of students betting on the number of times Huang would mention AI. While several people gave a number, the one who said "37" won, as that was how many times Huang talked about AI. &nbsp;

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was booed when he talked about artificial intelligence at the commencement speech at the University of Arizona. This is the second time in days a speaker was dissed by the crowd for praising AI. 

Artificial Intelligence has become a hot topic at commencement speeches in America this year, and for exactly what you think. Students have been openly showing their displeasure with AI amid concerns that they are going to be left jobless because of it. CEOs across the world have been pushing for the use of AI, and clearly, students who are stepping into the world are not happy. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was booed when he mentioned AI at the commencement address at the University of Arizona on Sunday. While speaking to as many as 10,000, he hit a nerve when he broached the topic that has left everyone in a tizzy. Schmidt acknowledged that AI could take away the future of those entering the workforce. As soon as he brought it up, students started jeering and booing. "I know what many of you are feeling about that. I can hear you. There is a fear. There is a fear in your generation that the future has already been written, that the machines are coming, that the jobs are evaporating, that the climate is breaking, that politics are fractured, and that you are inheriting a mess that you did not create.” Gloria Caulfield received booed at University of Central Florida for calling AI next Industrial Revolution He then told students that they would "help shape artificial intelligence". This is the second time in days that a speaker has received a similar response as soon as the topic of AI was brought up. Both times, it was clearly unplanned. At the University of Central Florida, Gloria Caulfield, a real estate executive, said, "The rise of artificial intelligence is the next Industrial Revolution", and no one in the crowd was happy. Students started booing Gloria, and she was taken aback. “Woop, what happened? OK, I struck a chord." She did not let it stop her from praising AI, as she added, "We’ve got a bipolar topic here, I see. AI capabilities are in the palm of our hands." Jensen Huang's AI number at Carnegie Mellon NVIDIA chief Jensen Huang spoke at Carnegie Mellon University recently and stated that AI will be a net positive for humanity and there’s no better time to “begin your life’s work” than now. He said this when companies freeze hirings and firing staff to push AI at workplace. “AI is not likely to replace you, but someone using AI better than you might," he said. While he was not booed for bringing it up, a viral video on social media from before his speech shows a group of students betting on the number of times Huang would mention AI. While several people gave a number, the one who said "37" won, as that was how many times Huang talked about AI.

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was booed when he talked about artificial intelligence at the commencement speech at the University of Arizona. This is the second time in days a speaker was dissed by the crowd for praising AI.&nbsp;

Students boo former Google CEO for talking about AI, second incident in a week - 'There is a fear...'

Marc Benioff, the chief executive of Salesforce, is leading a shift in how the company approaches software development. His strategy combines a pause in hiring software engineers with increased investment in artificial intelligence tools.The company stopped hiring software engineers in 2025, citing productivity gains from AI systems. At the same time, Benioff has said Salesforce could spend nearly $300 million on Anthropic AI tokens in 2026, reflecting a change in how resources are allocated.<h2>Why Salesforce paused hiring engineers</h2>Salesforce decided to halt hiring for software engineers after reporting productivity improvements of over 30 per cent using AI tools such as Agentforce. According to Benioff, these tools have allowed existing teams to complete more work without increasing headcount. This has led the company to focus less on hiring new engineers and more on improving efficiency with AI.&nbsp;However, the hiring pause applies mainly to engineering roles. The company has continued recruitment in other areas, including plans to add 1,000 to 2,000 sales staff to support its AI products.<h2>Shift towards AI-driven development</h2>Salesforce is increasing its investment in AI to support software development tasks. The planned $300 million spend on Anthropic tokens highlights how the company is using external AI systems to assist engineers. Benioff has described this shift as a move towards “digital labour”, where AI tools take on routine coding tasks while engineers focus on higher-level work.&nbsp;The company is also building systems to manage AI usage more efficiently, routing tasks between different models depending on complexity.<h2>Engineers still play a key role</h2>Despite the hiring freeze, Salesforce continues to employ around 15,000 engineers. Benioff has clarified that AI cannot replace human developers entirely. Instead, engineers are now working alongside AI systems, supervising and guiding their output. This includes reviewing code, managing AI tools and ensuring quality. This suggests a change in the role of engineers rather than a reduction in their importance.&nbsp;<h2>Salesforce’s broader AI investment strategy</h2>Salesforce has already invested over $300 million in Anthropic and holds a stake in the company. Its AI product line, Agentforce, is also growing, with reported annual revenue reaching around $800 million. The company estimates that AI now contributes to 30 per cent to 50 per cent of its overall workload, showing how central these tools have become to its operations.<h2>What this means for the tech industry</h2>Salesforce’s approach reflects a wider trend in the technology sector, where companies are focusing on AI to improve productivity rather than expanding teams. This shift could influence hiring patterns across the industry, especially in software development roles. At the same time, it highlights the growing importance of AI tools in everyday business operations.&nbsp;Salesforce is expected to continue refining its AI strategy while maintaining its current workforce structure. The company’s focus will likely remain on improving efficiency and scaling its AI systems. For the broader industry, the move signals a transition in how companies balance human talent and artificial intelligence in software development&nbsp;&nbsp;

Marc Benioff, the chief executive of Salesforce, is leading a shift in how the company approaches software development. His strategy combines a pause in hiring software engineers with increased investment in artificial intelligence tools.


Marc Benioff, the chief executive of Salesforce, is leading a shift in how the company approaches software development. His strategy combines a pause in hiring software engineers with increased investment in artificial intelligence tools. The company stopped hiring software engineers in 2025, citing productivity gains from AI systems. At the same time, Benioff has said Salesforce could spend nearly $300 million on Anthropic AI tokens in 2026, reflecting a change in how resources are allocated. Why Salesforce paused hiring engineers Salesforce decided to halt hiring for software engineers after reporting productivity improvements of over 30 per cent using AI tools such as Agentforce. According to Benioff, these tools have allowed existing teams to complete more work without increasing headcount. This has led the company to focus less on hiring new engineers and more on improving efficiency with AI. However, the hiring pause applies mainly to engineering roles. The company has continued recruitment in other areas, including plans to add 1,000 to 2,000 sales staff to support its AI products. Shift towards AI-driven development Salesforce is increasing its investment in AI to support software development tasks. The planned $300 million spend on Anthropic tokens highlights how the company is using external AI systems to assist engineers. Benioff has described this shift as a move towards “digital labour”, where AI tools take on routine coding tasks while engineers focus on higher-level work. The company is also building systems to manage AI usage more efficiently, routing tasks between different models depending on complexity. Engineers still play a key role Despite the hiring freeze, Salesforce continues to employ around 15,000 engineers. Benioff has clarified that AI cannot replace human developers entirely. Instead, engineers are now working alongside AI systems, supervising and guiding their output. This includes reviewing code, managing AI tools and ensuring quality. This suggests a change in the role of engineers rather than a reduction in their importance. Salesforce’s broader AI investment strategy Salesforce has already invested over $300 million in Anthropic and holds a stake in the company. Its AI product line, Agentforce, is also growing, with reported annual revenue reaching around $800 million. The company estimates that AI now contributes to 30 per cent to 50 per cent of its overall workload, showing how central these tools have become to its operations. What this means for the tech industry Salesforce’s approach reflects a wider trend in the technology sector, where companies are focusing on AI to improve productivity rather than expanding teams. This shift could influence hiring patterns across the industry, especially in software development roles. At the same time, it highlights the growing importance of AI tools in everyday business operations. Salesforce is expected to continue refining its AI strategy while maintaining its current workforce structure. The company’s focus will likely remain on improving efficiency and scaling its AI systems. For the broader industry, the move signals a transition in how companies balance human talent and artificial intelligence in software development

Marc Benioff, the chief executive of Salesforce, is leading a shift in how the company approaches software development. His strategy combines a pause in hiring software engineers with increased investment in artificial intelligence tools.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff pauses software engineer hiring as AI spending rises

An AI-generated social media post has gone viral amid renewed speculation over possible fresh strikes on Iran. The post, widely reposted online, fueled debate and confusion as tensions in the Middle East continue to rise. Experts and fact-checkers have warned that AI-generated visuals and misinformation are increasingly shaping narratives around the Iran conflict, making verification more difficult during fast-moving geopolitical developments


AI- Generated Post Amid Reposts of Possible Fresh Strikes On Iran

UK Members of Parliament are pushing for an “emergency kill switch” mechanism for artificial intelligence systems, aiming to allow authorities to shut down AI in extreme situations. The proposal comes amid growing global concerns over AI safety, misuse, and lack of regulatory control. Lawmakers argue that stronger safeguards are needed as AI becomes more powerful and widely deployed across critical sectors.


UK MPs Push Emergency ‘Kill Switch’ for AI Systems 

Lawmakers in the United Kingdom are calling for new powers that would allow the government to shut down artificial intelligence systems in case of serious risk. The proposal, often described as an AI “kill switch”, is being discussed as part of amendments to the country’s cyber security and resilience bill.The idea is supported by a group of MPs and campaign organisations who argue that governments need emergency tools to deal with potential threats from advanced AI systems.<h2>What is the proposed AI ‘kill switch’?</h2>The proposed amendment would give ministers the authority to shut down data centres or AI systems during a crisis. These powers would be used only in extreme situations, such as risks to national security, critical infrastructure or large-scale harm to people. Under the proposal, data centre operators would be required to build systems that allow instant shutdown if directed by the government. They would also need secure communication links with authorities to ensure quick action during emergencies.<h2>Why MPs are raising concerns</h2>Supporters of the proposal say that artificial intelligence is developing quickly and could create new types of risks. These include cyberattacks, misuse of advanced systems and threats to infrastructure. Concerns have increased following recent developments in AI technology. Some systems have shown the ability to identify vulnerabilities in software, raising questions about how such tools could be used in real-world scenarios.Lawmakers argue that current systems are not prepared to handle these risks and that stronger safeguards are needed.<h2>Political and industry response</h2>The proposal has backing from at least 11 MPs, including members from different political parties. Campaign group Control AI is also supporting the move and has previously gathered support from over 100 parliamentarians for stricter AI regulation. However, the UK government has not yet formally endorsed the amendment. Officials have said that the broader cyber security bill is aimed at improving protection for digital services and infrastructure.<h2>Global context and AI competition</h2>The discussion comes at a time when governments worldwide are increasing focus on AI regulation. Most advanced AI systems are currently hosted in data centres located in the United States, which adds complexity to how different countries manage risks. Recent developments in AI, including systems designed for cybersecurity tasks, have led to more debate about safety and oversight. There are also ongoing discussions between technology companies, governments and industry leaders about how to balance innovation with regulation.<h2>Concerns about national security</h2>Some lawmakers have warned that advanced AI systems could pose serious risks if left unchecked. They argue that coordinated cyberattacks or misuse of powerful AI tools could affect critical systems such as energy, transport and communication networks.The proposed “kill switch” is being described as a last-resort measure to prevent such scenarios. The amendment is expected to be debated in Parliament if it is selected for discussion. The outcome will depend on political support and broader policy considerations around technology and innovation. If approved, the proposal could introduce new requirements for data centre operators and change how AI systems are managed in the UK.The debate highlights a growing challenge for governments: how to encourage technological progress while ensuring safety and public trust in rapidly evolving AI systems.&nbsp;

Lawmakers in the United Kingdom are pushing for emergency powers that would allow the government to shut down artificial intelligence systems during major crises. 

Lawmakers in the United Kingdom are calling for new powers that would allow the government to shut down artificial intelligence systems in case of serious risk. The proposal, often described as an AI “kill switch”, is being discussed as part of amendments to the country’s cyber security and resilience bill. The idea is supported by a group of MPs and campaign organisations who argue that governments need emergency tools to deal with potential threats from advanced AI systems. What is the proposed AI ‘kill switch’? The proposed amendment would give ministers the authority to shut down data centres or AI systems during a crisis. These powers would be used only in extreme situations, such as risks to national security, critical infrastructure or large-scale harm to people. Under the proposal, data centre operators would be required to build systems that allow instant shutdown if directed by the government. They would also need secure communication links with authorities to ensure quick action during emergencies. Why MPs are raising concerns Supporters of the proposal say that artificial intelligence is developing quickly and could create new types of risks. These include cyberattacks, misuse of advanced systems and threats to infrastructure. Concerns have increased following recent developments in AI technology. Some systems have shown the ability to identify vulnerabilities in software, raising questions about how such tools could be used in real-world scenarios. Lawmakers argue that current systems are not prepared to handle these risks and that stronger safeguards are needed. Political and industry response The proposal has backing from at least 11 MPs, including members from different political parties. Campaign group Control AI is also supporting the move and has previously gathered support from over 100 parliamentarians for stricter AI regulation. However, the UK government has not yet formally endorsed the amendment. Officials have said that the broader cyber security bill is aimed at improving protection for digital services and infrastructure. Global context and AI competition The discussion comes at a time when governments worldwide are increasing focus on AI regulation. Most advanced AI systems are currently hosted in data centres located in the United States, which adds complexity to how different countries manage risks. Recent developments in AI, including systems designed for cybersecurity tasks, have led to more debate about safety and oversight. There are also ongoing discussions between technology companies, governments and industry leaders about how to balance innovation with regulation. Concerns about national security Some lawmakers have warned that advanced AI systems could pose serious risks if left unchecked. They argue that coordinated cyberattacks or misuse of powerful AI tools could affect critical systems such as energy, transport and communication networks. The proposed “kill switch” is being described as a last-resort measure to prevent such scenarios. The amendment is expected to be debated in Parliament if it is selected for discussion. The outcome will depend on political support and broader policy considerations around technology and innovation. If approved, the proposal could introduce new requirements for data centre operators and change how AI systems are managed in the UK. The debate highlights a growing challenge for governments: how to encourage technological progress while ensuring safety and public trust in rapidly evolving AI systems.

Lawmakers in the United Kingdom are pushing for emergency powers that would allow the government to shut down artificial intelligence systems during major crises.&nbsp;

United Kingdom cyber bill may introduce government-controlled AI shutdown powers: Know more below

China is upgrading its J-20 stealth fighter with artificial intelligence. The AI acts as a virtual copilot, processes combat data instantly, and controls autonomous drone swarms, pushing the aircraft's capabilities beyond human cognitive limits.

China is upgrading its J-20 stealth fighter with artificial intelligence. The AI acts as a virtual copilot, processes combat data instantly, and controls autonomous drone swarms, pushing the aircraft's capabilities beyond human cognitive limits.

‘Beyond human limits’: The terrifying AI upgrade inside China's J-20 stealth fighter

Is the global economy heading toward trouble while markets look the other way? Despite sharply rising oil prices and growing geopolitical tensions, global markets continue to push higher.

The S&P 500 has reached fresh record levels, fueled largely by tech and AI-driven gains. But many economists believe the market rally may be underpricing the risks ahead.

Markets Climb Despite Rising Oil Prices

OpenAI has introduced a new artificial intelligence model called GPT-5.5-Cyber, designed specifically for cybersecurity use cases. The model is currently being released in a limited preview to selected and vetted teams, marking a focused step in how AI tools are being adapted for specialised industries. The announcement comes just a month after Anthropic introduced its Mythos model, which also focused on advanced cybersecurity capabilities.&nbsp;<h2>What is GPT-5.5-Cyber and how is it different?</h2>GPT-5.5-Cyber is a variation of OpenAI’s latest GPT-5.5 model. Unlike general-purpose versions, this model is designed to be more flexible for security-related tasks. OpenAI said the model is not necessarily more powerful than the standard version, but it is adjusted to allow cybersecurity teams to perform tasks that would otherwise be restricted by safety controls. This makes it easier for professionals to analyse threats, test systems and understand vulnerabilities without running into limitations that apply to public versions of AI tools.&nbsp;<h2>How cybersecurity teams can use it</h2>According to OpenAI, GPT-5.5-Cyber is designed to support real-world cybersecurity workflows. These include identifying vulnerabilities in systems, analysing malware, validating patches and prioritising security issues. By reducing restrictions for trusted users, the model allows teams to work more efficiently on tasks that require deeper technical access. OpenAI said the goal is to help partners explore advanced workflows where specialised behaviour is necessary.<h2>Why access is limited</h2>The model is currently available only to a small group of vetted organisations. This controlled rollout is intended to ensure responsible use, given the sensitive nature of cybersecurity work.A similar approach was seen with Anthropic’s Mythos model, which was also released to a limited group as part of its Project Glasswing initiative. These steps show that companies are being cautious while deploying advanced AI tools in critical areas like security.<h2>Growing focus on AI in cybersecurity</h2>The release of GPT-5.5-Cyber reflects a broader trend in the industry. AI is increasingly being used to detect vulnerabilities, analyse threats and improve system security.Recent developments, including Anthropic’s Mythos, have shown how AI can identify complex bugs and assist security teams in ways that were difficult earlier. This has drawn attention from governments and financial institutions, highlighting the importance of such tools.<h2>What this means for the industry</h2>The introduction of specialised AI models for cybersecurity suggests that the field is moving towards more targeted solutions. Instead of using general AI systems, organisations are now adopting tools designed for specific tasks.While these models can improve efficiency and detection, they also raise questions about how access should be managed and how risks can be controlled.As GPT-5.5-Cyber continues its limited rollout, its impact will depend on how effectively teams use it in real-world scenarios. OpenAI may expand access in the future based on feedback from early users. For now, the release highlights how AI companies are focusing on practical applications, especially in areas like cybersecurity where accuracy and control are critical.

OpenAI has introduced a new artificial intelligence model called GPT-5.5-Cyber, designed specifically for cybersecurity use cases. The model is currently being released in a limited preview to selected and vetted teams.


OpenAI has introduced a new artificial intelligence model called GPT-5.5-Cyber, designed specifically for cybersecurity use cases. The model is currently being released in a limited preview to selected and vetted teams, marking a focused step in how AI tools are being adapted for specialised industries. The announcement comes just a month after Anthropic introduced its Mythos model, which also focused on advanced cybersecurity capabilities. What is GPT-5.5-Cyber and how is it different? GPT-5.5-Cyber is a variation of OpenAI’s latest GPT-5.5 model. Unlike general-purpose versions, this model is designed to be more flexible for security-related tasks. OpenAI said the model is not necessarily more powerful than the standard version, but it is adjusted to allow cybersecurity teams to perform tasks that would otherwise be restricted by safety controls. This makes it easier for professionals to analyse threats, test systems and understand vulnerabilities without running into limitations that apply to public versions of AI tools. How cybersecurity teams can use it According to OpenAI, GPT-5.5-Cyber is designed to support real-world cybersecurity workflows. These include identifying vulnerabilities in systems, analysing malware, validating patches and prioritising security issues. By reducing restrictions for trusted users, the model allows teams to work more efficiently on tasks that require deeper technical access. OpenAI said the goal is to help partners explore advanced workflows where specialised behaviour is necessary. Why access is limited The model is currently available only to a small group of vetted organisations. This controlled rollout is intended to ensure responsible use, given the sensitive nature of cybersecurity work. A similar approach was seen with Anthropic’s Mythos model, which was also released to a limited group as part of its Project Glasswing initiative. These steps show that companies are being cautious while deploying advanced AI tools in critical areas like security. Growing focus on AI in cybersecurity The release of GPT-5.5-Cyber reflects a broader trend in the industry. AI is increasingly being used to detect vulnerabilities, analyse threats and improve system security. Recent developments, including Anthropic’s Mythos, have shown how AI can identify complex bugs and assist security teams in ways that were difficult earlier. This has drawn attention from governments and financial institutions, highlighting the importance of such tools. What this means for the industry The introduction of specialised AI models for cybersecurity suggests that the field is moving towards more targeted solutions. Instead of using general AI systems, organisations are now adopting tools designed for specific tasks. While these models can improve efficiency and detection, they also raise questions about how access should be managed and how risks can be controlled. As GPT-5.5-Cyber continues its limited rollout, its impact will depend on how effectively teams use it in real-world scenarios. OpenAI may expand access in the future based on feedback from early users. For now, the release highlights how AI companies are focusing on practical applications, especially in areas like cybersecurity where accuracy and control are critical.

OpenAI has introduced a new artificial intelligence model called GPT-5.5-Cyber, designed specifically for cybersecurity use cases. The model is currently being released in a limited preview to selected and vetted teams.

OpenAI launches GPT-5.5-Cyber: Key things to know about the new model

Cloudflare, the tech giant which deals with AI agents, has decided to fire 1,100 employees across its offices in the world. The founders admitted to their staff that the company has become one of its own biggest customers, and the use of AI has exploded by more than 600 per cent in just three months. An internal memo seen by Business Insider, sent by co-founders Matthew Prince and Michelle Zatlyn, reads, "The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed. We don’t just build and sell AI tools and platforms. We are our own most demanding customer." They admitted AI has taken over the scene at Cloudflare and that workers across engineering, HR, finance, and marketing are running "thousands of AI agent sessions each day." The memo shows that the company is shaping for the future, as it wrote, it has to be “intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era.”<h2>Cloudflare layoffs: Total number of employees at the company</h2>On Thursday, the cloud networking firm reported $639.8 million in its first-quarter revenue, a 34 per cent increase from a year earlier. Cloudflare claims that the global layoffs are not a cost-cutting measure but part of an effort to “reimagine every internal process, team, and role across the company.” It has announced that it intends to become an AI-first company. At the end of 2025, the company had 5,156 full-time employees, which means the layoffs will affect nearly one-fifth of its global workforce. The Cloudflare founders insist that it is a one-time reset to avoid &nbsp;“smaller, repeated cuts”. “We’ve asked the team to do this only once.” The employees were reportedly notified directly through email about the restructuring and firings.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meta-layoffs-8-000-employees-to-lose-job-in-may-amid-massive-ai-push-1776997672113">Meta layoffs: 8,000 employees to lose jobs in May amid massive AI push</a><h2>Severance package at Cloudflare</h2> The affected employees are being offered generous severance packages. They will be given full base pay and health coverage for US employees through the end of 2026, and equity vesting through August 15. The restructuring, comprising mainly of severance and other benefits, is expected to cost Cloudflare $140 million to $150 million. It plans to complete the exercise by the end of the third quarter.&nbsp;

Cloudflare has announced its intention to become an AI-first company and will undertake massive restructuring that will cost around $150 million. It will fire 1,100 employees as it admitted that AI use has exploded at the company.

Cloudflare, the tech giant which deals with AI agents, has decided to fire 1,100 employees across its offices in the world. The founders admitted to their staff that the company has become one of its own biggest customers, and the use of AI has exploded by more than 600 per cent in just three months. An internal memo seen by Business Insider, sent by co-founders Matthew Prince and Michelle Zatlyn, reads, "The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed. We don’t just build and sell AI tools and platforms. We are our own most demanding customer." They admitted AI has taken over the scene at Cloudflare and that workers across engineering, HR, finance, and marketing are running "thousands of AI agent sessions each day." The memo shows that the company is shaping for the future, as it wrote, it has to be “intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era.” Cloudflare layoffs: Total number of employees at the company On Thursday, the cloud networking firm reported $639.8 million in its first-quarter revenue, a 34 per cent increase from a year earlier. Cloudflare claims that the global layoffs are not a cost-cutting measure but part of an effort to “reimagine every internal process, team, and role across the company.” It has announced that it intends to become an AI-first company. At the end of 2025, the company had 5,156 full-time employees, which means the layoffs will affect nearly one-fifth of its global workforce. The Cloudflare founders insist that it is a one-time reset to avoid “smaller, repeated cuts”. “We’ve asked the team to do this only once.” The employees were reportedly notified directly through email about the restructuring and firings. Also Read: Meta layoffs: 8,000 employees to lose jobs in May amid massive AI push Severance package at Cloudflare The affected employees are being offered generous severance packages. They will be given full base pay and health coverage for US employees through the end of 2026, and equity vesting through August 15. The restructuring, comprising mainly of severance and other benefits, is expected to cost Cloudflare $140 million to $150 million. It plans to complete the exercise by the end of the third quarter.

Cloudflare has announced its intention to become an AI-first company and will undertake massive restructuring that will cost around $150 million. It will fire 1,100 employees as it admitted that AI use has exploded at the company.

Cloudflare announces mega layoffs as AI use explodes by 600%. 'Thousands of AI agent sessions...'

Asia’s tech markets are witnessing a fresh AI-driven rally, with chipmakers at the center of the global boom.

AI Chip Boom Creates Record Wealth in Asia

Asian markets surged to fresh record highs after signs of progress toward a possible peace deal in the Gulf boosted investor confidence globally.


AI & Hope: Markets Scale New Highs

Samsung Electronics has crossed the $1 trillion market capitalisation mark, becoming only the second Asian company after TSMC to achieve this milestone. Shares of the South Korean chip giant surged over 10 percent, tracking a global rally in artificial intelligence-linked stocks. The trigger is strong first-quarter earnings.

AI Rally Pushes Global Chip Stocks to Record Highs

A man created an AI bot to handle his entire job search process, starting with building resumes, finding the right openings and then applying for them. The anonymous Redditor explained that let the bot do everything while he slept. In one month, he has 50 interview calls. His story has triggered a debate on social media, as people questioned how ethical it was to use AI to get job offers. The man countered this reaction by saying that companies are already scanning resumes using AI, so it is hardly wrong to use the same tool to apply for the jobs. "I created an AI bot that analyses candidate information, examines job descriptions, generates unique CVs and cover letters for each job, answers specific questions that recruiters ask, and automatically applies to jobs," he wrote on Reddit's 'Get Employed' board. The AI bot took a lot on its plate, tweaking each application to fit the job description.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-administration-considers-vetting-ai-models-before-they-are-released-report-1777947086612">Trump administration considers vetting AI models before they are released: Report</a><h2>AI screened jobs, tailored resumes and applied</h2>The AI bot scanned job listings and then analysed each description to know what the recruiters were looking for. It then rewrote his CV and also a cover letter to match. The bot even answered questions from the recruited and sent the applications. Meanwhile, the man napped while the bot tailored each application to go perfectly with the opening. "And all of this while I was sleeping!" the man wrote. "In just one month, this method helped me secure around 50 interviews. The tailored CVs and cover letters, customised based on each job description, made a significant difference," he added.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/from-chips-to-chatbots-how-india-is-chasing-ai-billions-1771413723048">From chips to chatbots: How India is chasing AI billions</a>&nbsp;He justified using AI to land 50 interviews, even though he understands the ethical component of doing so. The man claimed that companies are using AI to screen candidates, and automated systems are outright rejecting applicants even before a human sees the CV. "We face a paradox, as we seek to optimise the selection process, we risk losing the human element that often makes a difference in a work environment," the Redditor wrote. He added, "We'll need to find a delicate balance between the efficiency of artificial intelligence and the richness of human interactions."

An Artificial Intelligence bot did everything for this man while he napped, looking through jobs, tailoring his resumes, answering questions and sending out the final applications. Social media is divided over whether this was an ethical use of AI.

A man created an AI bot to handle his entire job search process, starting with building resumes, finding the right openings and then applying for them. The anonymous Redditor explained that let the bot do everything while he slept. In one month, he has 50 interview calls. His story has triggered a debate on social media, as people questioned how ethical it was to use AI to get job offers. The man countered this reaction by saying that companies are already scanning resumes using AI, so it is hardly wrong to use the same tool to apply for the jobs. "I created an AI bot that analyses candidate information, examines job descriptions, generates unique CVs and cover letters for each job, answers specific questions that recruiters ask, and automatically applies to jobs," he wrote on Reddit's 'Get Employed' board. The AI bot took a lot on its plate, tweaking each application to fit the job description. Also Read: Trump administration considers vetting AI models before they are released: Report AI screened jobs, tailored resumes and applied The AI bot scanned job listings and then analysed each description to know what the recruiters were looking for. It then rewrote his CV and also a cover letter to match. The bot even answered questions from the recruited and sent the applications. Meanwhile, the man napped while the bot tailored each application to go perfectly with the opening. "And all of this while I was sleeping!" the man wrote. "In just one month, this method helped me secure around 50 interviews. The tailored CVs and cover letters, customised based on each job description, made a significant difference," he added. Also Read: From chips to chatbots: How India is chasing AI billions He justified using AI to land 50 interviews, even though he understands the ethical component of doing so. The man claimed that companies are using AI to screen candidates, and automated systems are outright rejecting applicants even before a human sees the CV. "We face a paradox, as we seek to optimise the selection process, we risk losing the human element that often makes a difference in a work environment," the Redditor wrote. He added, "We'll need to find a delicate balance between the efficiency of artificial intelligence and the richness of human interactions."

An Artificial Intelligence bot did everything for this man while he napped, looking through jobs, tailoring his resumes, answering questions and sending out the final applications. Social media is divided over whether this was an ethical use of AI.

AI bot landed one man 50 interviews while he napped, and the internet is divided

The Oscars 2027 are set to introduce stricter guidelines on the use of AI-generated content in film submissions. The move aims to address growing concerns over authenticity, creativity, and the role of artificial intelligence in filmmaking. Academy officials are working to define clear boundaries on how AI can be used in writing, editing, and production while ensuring fairness and preserving artistic integrity in cinema.


Oscars 2027: Stricter Guidelines for AI-Generated Content 

AI data centres will pose an immense danger to the world because of the gas power plants being built to power them. According to a report, just 11 data centres could exceed the greenhouse emissions of several countries combined.

AI data centres will pose an immense danger to the world because of the gas power plants being built to power them. According to a report, just 11 data centres could exceed the greenhouse emissions of several countries combined.

Terrible cost of AI: Just 11 data centres could emit more CO2 than Norway, Iceland and Morocco

An AI-powered exoskeleton showcased at the Canton Fair has demonstrated a breakthrough in mobility technology by helping a paralysed patient walk again. The innovation highlights major advances in robotics, rehabilitation science, and assistive healthcare solutions for patients with mobility loss.


AI Exoskeleton Helps Paralysed Patient Walk at Canton Fair Demo 

As artificial intelligence tools become part of daily life, researchers are raising an important question are we relying too much on AI to think for us? A growing number of studies suggest that overuse of tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Claude may affect how people think, remember and solve problems.&nbsp;<h2>What researchers are observing</h2>At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, researcher Nataliya Kosmyna noticed something unusual. Students were submitting essays that looked very similar. Many also struggled to recall what they had written. This raised concerns that AI tools were being used heavily for thinking tasks. At the same time, researchers observed that people may be forgetting information more easily, possibly due to increased reliance on AI.<h2>Study shows drop in brain activity</h2>To understand this better, researchers at MIT conducted a study with 54 students. They divided them into three groups:One used ChatGPTOne used Google Search (without AI summaries)One used no technologyThe results showed a clear difference.Students who used their own thinking showed strong brain activity across multiple areas. Those using search engines also showed good activity, especially in visual processing. However, the ChatGPT group showed up to 55 per cent less brain activity, especially in areas linked to creativity and deep thinking.&nbsp;Memory and ownership also affectedThe study found that people using AI tools had weaker memory recall.Many participants:Could not quote from their own essaysFelt less connected to their workThis suggests that when AI does most of the thinking, people may not fully process or remember the information. Other research has also described this behaviour as “cognitive surrender”, where users accept AI answers without questioning them.&nbsp;<h2>Impact beyond students</h2>The effects are not limited to classrooms.A separate study found that medical professionals using AI tools for diagnosis became less accurate when they later worked without those tools. Researchers warn that over-reliance on AI could reduce problem-solving ability and independent judgement over time.&nbsp;<h2>Long-term risks for brain health</h2>Experts like neuroscientist Vivienne Ming say the long-term risks could be serious. Low brain activity, especially reduced gamma wave activity, has been linked in some studies to cognitive decline later in life. There are also parallels with earlier technologies. For example, heavy use of GPS has been linked to weaker spatial memory, which is an early indicator in conditions like Alzheimer's disease.&nbsp;<h2>Can AI still be useful?</h2>Despite these concerns, researchers say AI can still be helpful if used the right way.A small group in the study (less than 10 per cent) used AI differently. They:Gathered information using AIAnalysed it on their ownThese participants showed stronger brain activity and better results.Experts suggest a balanced approach:Think first before using AIUse AI to challenge ideas, not replace themAsk AI questions instead of taking direct answersThe way forward: Human + AIResearchers believe the future lies in “hybrid intelligence”, where humans and AI work together.This means:Humans focus on thinking and judgementAI supports with speed and dataThe key idea is simple AI should assist thinking, not replace it. As AI tools become more powerful, how we use them will decide whether they improve our abilities or slowly weaken them

As artificial intelligence become part of daily life, researchers are raising an question are we relying too much on AI to think for us? A growing number of studies suggest that overuse of tools like ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude may affect how people think, remember and solve problems. 

As artificial intelligence tools become part of daily life, researchers are raising an important question are we relying too much on AI to think for us? A growing number of studies suggest that overuse of tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Claude may affect how people think, remember and solve problems. What researchers are observing At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, researcher Nataliya Kosmyna noticed something unusual. Students were submitting essays that looked very similar. Many also struggled to recall what they had written. This raised concerns that AI tools were being used heavily for thinking tasks. At the same time, researchers observed that people may be forgetting information more easily, possibly due to increased reliance on AI. Study shows drop in brain activity To understand this better, researchers at MIT conducted a study with 54 students. They divided them into three groups: One used ChatGPT One used Google Search (without AI summaries) One used no technology The results showed a clear difference. Students who used their own thinking showed strong brain activity across multiple areas. Those using search engines also showed good activity, especially in visual processing. However, the ChatGPT group showed up to 55 per cent less brain activity, especially in areas linked to creativity and deep thinking. Memory and ownership also affected The study found that people using AI tools had weaker memory recall. Many participants: Could not quote from their own essays Felt less connected to their work This suggests that when AI does most of the thinking, people may not fully process or remember the information. Other research has also described this behaviour as “cognitive surrender”, where users accept AI answers without questioning them. Impact beyond students The effects are not limited to classrooms. A separate study found that medical professionals using AI tools for diagnosis became less accurate when they later worked without those tools. Researchers warn that over-reliance on AI could reduce problem-solving ability and independent judgement over time. Long-term risks for brain health Experts like neuroscientist Vivienne Ming say the long-term risks could be serious. Low brain activity, especially reduced gamma wave activity, has been linked in some studies to cognitive decline later in life. There are also parallels with earlier technologies. For example, heavy use of GPS has been linked to weaker spatial memory, which is an early indicator in conditions like Alzheimer's disease. Can AI still be useful? Despite these concerns, researchers say AI can still be helpful if used the right way. A small group in the study (less than 10 per cent) used AI differently. They: Gathered information using AI Analysed it on their own These participants showed stronger brain activity and better results. Experts suggest a balanced approach: Think first before using AI Use AI to challenge ideas, not replace them Ask AI questions instead of taking direct answers The way forward: Human + AI Researchers believe the future lies in “hybrid intelligence”, where humans and AI work together. This means: Humans focus on thinking and judgement AI supports with speed and data The key idea is simple AI should assist thinking, not replace it. As AI tools become more powerful, how we use them will decide whether they improve our abilities or slowly weaken them

As artificial intelligence become part of daily life, researchers are raising an question are we relying too much on AI to think for us? A growing number of studies suggest that overuse of tools like ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude may affect how people think, remember and solve problems.&nbsp;

Are AI tools reducing people’s critical thinking skills?

A company has triggered debate after launching a service which allows users to talk to Jesus Christ. Just Like Me lets them have video calls with an AI avatar of Christ for $1.99 per minute. Several people have been left a bit uncomfortable as the AI tool creates a weird intersection between faith, technology, and commercialisation. The Christ on the platform is visually modelled after actor Jonathan Roumie (from the TV series The Chosen). You can pay $1.99 per minute for a video call, or choose a monthly package of $49.99 for 45 minutes. The AI is trained on the King James Bible and various sermons. It has prayer and words of encouragement in multiple languages. The avatar glitches a bit, and the lips don’t synchronise all the time. The AI avatar also remembers previous conversations. Chris Breed, CEO of Just Like Me, says people are developing an emotional connection with Christ. "You do feel a little accountable to the AI. They’re your friend. You’ve made an attachment,” he said.<h2>AI for prayer triggers debate</h2>Faith-based generative AI is rapidly growing and is not surprising since chatbots have entered all kinds of fields - from medical advice to therapy, and even becoming a friend you can have conversations with. However, in the religious field, it is raising certain questions as coupling it with technology can change an individual’s relationship with faith. Further, religious leaders and scholars warn that an algorithm—which processes data patterns without consciousness or spiritual agency—cannot provide a genuine "sacramental" experience. Then there is also the fear of "AI hallucinations" as the chatbot can misrepresent scripture or skip core moral teachings.<h2>Critics slam service</h2>The biggest controversy is over paying for praying. The &nbsp;$1.99 price tag for a minute of conversation with God doesn't sit right with most people. Critics on social media have condemned the company as "evil," arguing that real prayer is free and that the app exploits vulnerable people in spiritual need. Digitalising faith has led to anxiety as Pope Leo XIV recently warned that such technologies could negatively impact spiritual development, while other AI religious tools (like Hindu, Buddhist, and Islamic versions) have also faced scrutiny for blurring the line between education and imitation. &nbsp;

An AI chatbot lets you have video calls with Jesus Christ. Well, it is an avatar, but it has triggered debate about where to draw the line when it comes to technology and dealing with people's faith. The service required users to dole out a fee, inviting criticism.

A company has triggered debate after launching a service which allows users to talk to Jesus Christ. Just Like Me lets them have video calls with an AI avatar of Christ for $1.99 per minute. Several people have been left a bit uncomfortable as the AI tool creates a weird intersection between faith, technology, and commercialisation. The Christ on the platform is visually modelled after actor Jonathan Roumie (from the TV series The Chosen). You can pay $1.99 per minute for a video call, or choose a monthly package of $49.99 for 45 minutes. The AI is trained on the King James Bible and various sermons. It has prayer and words of encouragement in multiple languages. The avatar glitches a bit, and the lips don’t synchronise all the time. The AI avatar also remembers previous conversations. Chris Breed, CEO of Just Like Me, says people are developing an emotional connection with Christ. "You do feel a little accountable to the AI. They’re your friend. You’ve made an attachment,” he said. AI for prayer triggers debate Faith-based generative AI is rapidly growing and is not surprising since chatbots have entered all kinds of fields - from medical advice to therapy, and even becoming a friend you can have conversations with. However, in the religious field, it is raising certain questions as coupling it with technology can change an individual’s relationship with faith. Further, religious leaders and scholars warn that an algorithm—which processes data patterns without consciousness or spiritual agency—cannot provide a genuine "sacramental" experience. Then there is also the fear of "AI hallucinations" as the chatbot can misrepresent scripture or skip core moral teachings. Critics slam service The biggest controversy is over paying for praying. The $1.99 price tag for a minute of conversation with God doesn't sit right with most people. Critics on social media have condemned the company as "evil," arguing that real prayer is free and that the app exploits vulnerable people in spiritual need. Digitalising faith has led to anxiety as Pope Leo XIV recently warned that such technologies could negatively impact spiritual development, while other AI religious tools (like Hindu, Buddhist, and Islamic versions) have also faced scrutiny for blurring the line between education and imitation.

An AI chatbot lets you have video calls with Jesus Christ. Well, it is an avatar, but it has triggered debate about where to draw the line when it comes to technology and dealing with people's faith. The service required users to pay a fee, inviting criticism.

Pay for prayer: AI platform lets you have a video call with Jesus Christ for $1.99, and people aren't happy

A series of unusual deaths and disappearances involving top defence scientists across the globe is raising fresh concerns and fueling speculation. From China to the United States, experts working on cutting-edge military technologies, including artificial intelligence, hypersonic weapons, nuclear research, and space defence, have reportedly died under mysterious or unexplained circumstances. These incidents have sparked widespread debate over whether they are isolated tragedies or part of a larger, coordinated pattern.&nbsp;In Washington, at least 11 cases involving scientists linked to sensitive fields such as nuclear technology, advanced weapons, and space research are now under scrutiny. The issue has drawn political attention, with Republican Representative Eric Burlison raising concerns about possible foreign involvement. "We are in competition with China, Russia, and Iran on nuclear technology, advanced weapons, and space. Meanwhile, our top scientists keep vanishing," he wrote on X.&nbsp;US President Donald Trump described the developments as "pretty serious stuff", while expressing hope that they may simply be coincidental. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has launched an inquiry into the incidents. In China, multiple reports from domestic and international media indicate that at least nine scientists working in similarly sensitive areas have died in recent years. While many of these deaths have been attributed to accidents or sudden illnesses, several remain unexplained. The scientists ranged in age from 26 to 68.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meta-layoffs-8-000-employees-to-lose-job-in-may-amid-massive-ai-push-1776997672113">Meta layoffs: 8,000 employees to lose jobs in May amid massive AI push</a>&nbsp;One closely examined case involves Feng Yanghe, a 38-year-old professor at the National University of Defence Technology, who died in a car crash in Beijing in July 2023. Feng had been working on advanced simulation models tied to potential scenarios involving Taiwan. According to official reports, he was returning from a meeting around 2:35 a.m. when the crash occurred.&nbsp;A government-affiliated science platform described his death as having been "sacrificed while performing official duties", terminology typically reserved for military personnel. He was later buried at Babaoshan Cemetery, a site often designated for prominent Communist Party members and state-recognised figures. A researcher monitoring Chinese military developments told Newsweek that certain aspects of the case appeared unusual, particularly the timing and official narrative.&nbsp;"Feng was a mastermind behind AI simulations of potential Taiwan scenarios, and it's very odd that the accident happened in the middle of the night," the researcher said. They also questioned the language used in official reports, noting that accident victims are rarely described as having ‘sacrificed’ their lives. Feng’s case is part of a broader pattern.&nbsp;&nbsp;Several other Chinese scientists in strategically important fields have died in recent years under varying circumstances:&nbsp;<ul><li>Chen Shuming, 57, a microelectronics specialist, died in a similar incident in 2018.</li><li>Feng Yanghe, a military AI expert, died in a car crash in July 2023.</li><li>Zhou Guangyuan, a chemist, died in December 2023 of unspecified causes.</li><li>Liu Donghao, a data scientist, died after an unspecified accident in March 2024.</li><li>Zhang Xiaoxin, 62, a space expert, died in a car accident in December 2024.</li><li>Zhang Daibing, 47, a drone expert, died in January 2025; the cause was not disclosed.</li><li>Li Minyong, a biomedical chemist, died after a sudden illness in November 2025.</li><li>Fang Daining, a hypersonics expert, died following a medical episode abroad in February 2026.</li><li>Yan Hong, a hypersonics researcher, reportedly died after an illness in March 2026.</li></ul>Many of these individuals were working in fields considered strategically critical, particularly military AI, hypersonic systems, and advanced weapons technologies. "The areas are in hypersonics, in military AI, including swarming technology simulations... these types of tech seem to be overrepresented," the researcher said, while adding that some cases could still be "complete accidents".&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-reclassifies-state-licensed-marijuana-in-major-policy-shift-1777001411626/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-reclassifies-state-licensed-marijuana-in-major-policy-shift-1777001411626/embed</a>&nbsp;At present, there is no confirmed evidence that countries such as the United States, China, Russia, or Iran are conducting coordinated operations targeting scientists. However, similar concerns have arisen in the past—for example, allegations that Israel targeted Iranian nuclear experts in efforts to slow Iran’s nuclear programme.

Unexplained deaths of defence scientists in the US and China raise fears of covert operations. FBI investigates as global tensions grow

A series of unusual deaths and disappearances involving top defence scientists across the globe is raising fresh concerns and fueling speculation. From China to the United States, experts working on cutting-edge military technologies, including artificial intelligence, hypersonic weapons, nuclear research, and space defence, have reportedly died under mysterious or unexplained circumstances. These incidents have sparked widespread debate over whether they are isolated tragedies or part of a larger, coordinated pattern. In Washington, at least 11 cases involving scientists linked to sensitive fields such as nuclear technology, advanced weapons, and space research are now under scrutiny. The issue has drawn political attention, with Republican Representative Eric Burlison raising concerns about possible foreign involvement. "We are in competition with China, Russia, and Iran on nuclear technology, advanced weapons, and space. Meanwhile, our top scientists keep vanishing," he wrote on X. US President Donald Trump described the developments as "pretty serious stuff", while expressing hope that they may simply be coincidental. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has launched an inquiry into the incidents. In China, multiple reports from domestic and international media indicate that at least nine scientists working in similarly sensitive areas have died in recent years. While many of these deaths have been attributed to accidents or sudden illnesses, several remain unexplained. The scientists ranged in age from 26 to 68. Also Read: Meta layoffs: 8,000 employees to lose jobs in May amid massive AI push One closely examined case involves Feng Yanghe, a 38-year-old professor at the National University of Defence Technology, who died in a car crash in Beijing in July 2023. Feng had been working on advanced simulation models tied to potential scenarios involving Taiwan. According to official reports, he was returning from a meeting around 2:35 a.m. when the crash occurred. A government-affiliated science platform described his death as having been "sacrificed while performing official duties", terminology typically reserved for military personnel. He was later buried at Babaoshan Cemetery, a site often designated for prominent Communist Party members and state-recognised figures. A researcher monitoring Chinese military developments told Newsweek that certain aspects of the case appeared unusual, particularly the timing and official narrative. "Feng was a mastermind behind AI simulations of potential Taiwan scenarios, and it's very odd that the accident happened in the middle of the night," the researcher said. They also questioned the language used in official reports, noting that accident victims are rarely described as having ‘sacrificed’ their lives. Feng’s case is part of a broader pattern. Several other Chinese scientists in strategically important fields have died in recent years under varying circumstances: Chen Shuming, 57, a microelectronics specialist, died in a similar incident in 2018. Feng Yanghe, a military AI expert, died in a car crash in July 2023. Zhou Guangyuan, a chemist, died in December 2023 of unspecified causes. Liu Donghao, a data scientist, died after an unspecified accident in March 2024. Zhang Xiaoxin, 62, a space expert, died in a car accident in December 2024. Zhang Daibing, 47, a drone expert, died in January 2025; the cause was not disclosed. Li Minyong, a biomedical chemist, died after a sudden illness in November 2025. Fang Daining, a hypersonics expert, died following a medical episode abroad in February 2026. Yan Hong, a hypersonics researcher, reportedly died after an illness in March 2026. Many of these individuals were working in fields considered strategically critical, particularly military AI, hypersonic systems, and advanced weapons technologies. "The areas are in hypersonics, in military AI, including swarming technology simulations... these types of tech seem to be overrepresented," the researcher said, while adding that some cases could still be "complete accidents". https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-reclassifies-state-licensed-marijuana-in-major-policy-shift-1777001411626/embed At present, there is no confirmed evidence that countries such as the United States, China, Russia, or Iran are conducting coordinated operations targeting scientists. However, similar concerns have arisen in the past—for example, allegations that Israel targeted Iranian nuclear experts in efforts to slow Iran’s nuclear programme.

Mysterious deaths and disappearances of defence scientists in the US and China spark concerns, conspiracy theories, and ongoing investigations

Mysterious deaths of defence scientists in US and China spark global concern

Meta is preparing to cut thousands of jobs next month as it significantly ramps up investment in artificial intelligence (AI). In a memo sent to employees on Thursday (April 23), the company revealed plans to reduce its workforce by 10%, impacting around 8,000 employees, while also freezing hiring for thousands of open roles. The layoffs are largely driven by Meta’s increased spending in key areas, particularly AI.&nbsp;&nbsp;The company is expected to invest $135 billion this year alone, an amount roughly equal to its total AI spending over the previous three years combined, according to a source familiar with the memo. A company spokesperson confirmed the planned job cuts but declined to provide further details. Earlier this year, CEO Mark Zuckerberg had hinted at potential layoffs, emphasizing the growing efficiency of AI-powered workflows. He said that employees leveraging AI tools are able to accomplish tasks that previously required entire teams.&nbsp;"I think that 2026 is going to be the year that AI starts to dramatically change the way that we work," Zuckerberg said. Recent reports from Reuters suggested that Meta could cut more than 10,000 jobs this year, while the internal memo was first reported by Bloomberg.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-extends-israel-lebanon-ceasefire-by-three-weeks-after-white-house-meeting-1776996284895">Trump extends Israel-Lebanon ceasefire by three weeks after White House meeting</a><h2>What will the severance package be for staff?</h2>Regarding severance, the company outlined benefits for affected US employees: “We will support those who are laid off with a generous severance package which, in the US, will include 16 weeks base pay plus two weeks for every year of employment,” the memo said. It added, “We will also cover the cost of COBRA health care coverage for US employees and their families for 18 months.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-theft-of-ai-technology-1776997769466/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-theft-of-ai-technology-1776997769466/embed</a><h2>And what about employees outside the US?</h2>For employees outside the United States, the company said, “Packages outside the US will be similar but vary by country, as will local timelines and processes. We will also offer career services to support people in finding another role, and immigration support for those who need it. We'll share more of these details in a follow-up post ahead of May 20.” The memo, signed by Gale, acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the announcement: “I know this leaves everyone with nearly a month of ambiguity, which is incredibly unsettling. We will try to answer your questions here in the comments, but as we're still working through the details, we aren't able to share much more until later in May. Meanwhile, you can find more information on the People Portal, which includes our standard FAQs and logistical details for layoffs.”

Meta plans to cut 10% of workforce, impacting 8,000 jobs, as it boosts AI spending to $135B. Zuckerberg says AI will transform work in 2026

Meta is preparing to cut thousands of jobs next month as it significantly ramps up investment in artificial intelligence (AI). In a memo sent to employees on Thursday (April 23), the company revealed plans to reduce its workforce by 10%, impacting around 8,000 employees, while also freezing hiring for thousands of open roles. The layoffs are largely driven by Meta’s increased spending in key areas, particularly AI. The company is expected to invest $135 billion this year alone, an amount roughly equal to its total AI spending over the previous three years combined, according to a source familiar with the memo. A company spokesperson confirmed the planned job cuts but declined to provide further details. Earlier this year, CEO Mark Zuckerberg had hinted at potential layoffs, emphasizing the growing efficiency of AI-powered workflows. He said that employees leveraging AI tools are able to accomplish tasks that previously required entire teams. "I think that 2026 is going to be the year that AI starts to dramatically change the way that we work," Zuckerberg said. Recent reports from Reuters suggested that Meta could cut more than 10,000 jobs this year, while the internal memo was first reported by Bloomberg. Also Read: Trump extends Israel-Lebanon ceasefire by three weeks after White House meeting What will the severance package be for staff? Regarding severance, the company outlined benefits for affected US employees: “We will support those who are laid off with a generous severance package which, in the US, will include 16 weeks base pay plus two weeks for every year of employment,” the memo said. It added, “We will also cover the cost of COBRA health care coverage for US employees and their families for 18 months.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-theft-of-ai-technology-1776997769466/embed And what about employees outside the US? For employees outside the United States, the company said, “Packages outside the US will be similar but vary by country, as will local timelines and processes. We will also offer career services to support people in finding another role, and immigration support for those who need it. We'll share more of these details in a follow-up post ahead of May 20.” The memo, signed by Gale, acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the announcement: “I know this leaves everyone with nearly a month of ambiguity, which is incredibly unsettling. We will try to answer your questions here in the comments, but as we're still working through the details, we aren't able to share much more until later in May. Meanwhile, you can find more information on the People Portal, which includes our standard FAQs and logistical details for layoffs.”

Meta to cut 10% workforce amid $135 billion artificial intelligence push; around 8,000 jobs affected as company shifts focus to AI

Meta layoffs: 8,000 employees to lose jobs in May amid massive AI push

In a stunning breakthrough for robotics and artificial intelligence, a humanoid robot has completed a half-marathon race, outperforming human participants and setting a new benchmark in endurance robotics. The robot not only finished the race successfully but also recorded a time that challenges competitive human runners, sparking global debate about the future of sports, AI, and human–machine competition. 

Humanoid Robot Wins Half-Marathon & Smashes Humans' Record 

The United States has accused China of conducting “industrial-scale theft” of artificial intelligence technology, escalating tensions between the world’s two largest economies. U.S. officials allege coordinated efforts involving cyber intrusions, corporate espionage, and forced technology transfers to gain access to cutting-edge AI systems.

US Accuses China of Industrial-Scale Theft of AI Technology

The legendary physicist Stephen Hawking warned that autonomous AI could ultimately spell the end of humanity.


The legendary physicist Stephen Hawking warned that autonomous AI could ultimately spell the end of humanity.

‘Stephen Hawking on artificial intelligence: What he said before he died

A new AI-powered headset is shifting the focus of healthcare from the body to the brain. By tracking neural activity in real time, the device can detect subtle changes and potentially warn users about health risks before symptoms even appear. This breakthrough could transform early diagnosis, especially for neurological conditions. While it opens exciting possibilities, it also raises important questions about data privacy and how our brain signals might be used in the future.

AI Headset Can Read Your Brain? New Tech Monitors Neural Activity for Health Alerts

Renowned physicist Stephen Hawking had repeatedly warned that artificial intelligence could become an existential threat to humanity if not properly controlled. He cautioned that rapidly advancing AI systems might one day surpass human intelligence, raising concerns about safety, ethics, and long-term global risks.

Stephen Hawking Warned That AI Could Pose An Existential Risk 

They built it. They funded it. Now some of the world's leading AI researchers say they may have created something that cannot be controlled. In safety tests, AI models have tried to blackmail their creators, write self-spreading viruses, leave secret messages to future versions of themselves, and cancel safety alerts. Groups concerned about AI evading human control are now recruiting content creators to spread the message to mass audiences. But the warning itself is not new. It has been building for years, inside the very labs where these systems are being built.


The AI Doomsday: Could AI Turn on Humanity?  | Can Humans Control What They Build? 

Pope Leo XIV has warned that artificial intelligence could gradually replace reality with simulation if left unchecked, urging students to engage with technology responsibly while preserving human judgment and creativity. Speaking during an address to students, the Pope highlighted both the opportunities and risks of AI, encouraging young people to embrace innovation without losing sight of human values and critical thinking in a rapidly changing digital world.

Pope Leo Says AI Slowly Replacing Reality with Simulation; Urges Students to Embrace Technology 

Scientists in China are exploring the use of diamond-based materials to tackle one of the biggest challenges in the global AI race-excess heat generated by high-performance computing chips. Researchers say synthetic diamond’s exceptional thermal conductivity could help cool next-generation processors, improving efficiency and performance in advanced data centres and AI systems.


China's Diamond Fix for AI Race; Scientists Working Towards Reducing Heat

#Gravitas Google is reportedly in talks with the Pentagon to deploy its Gemini AI for classified military operations, a move that could redefine how wars are planned, fought, and controlled.


Pentagon Weighs Google’s Gemini AI for Military Use 